Source: European Parliament
Priority question for written answer P-000590/2025
to the Commission
Rule 144
Isabelle Le Callennec (PPE)
DG ENVI is considering reclassifying the eel to include the species in Appendix I of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora. However, although the eel population remains low, it seems to have stabilised over the last few years, in particular thanks to the efforts of fishermen and the fisheries sector to implement Regulation (EC) No 1100/2007 and carry out restocking initiatives. This trend is starting to bear fruit, as confirmed by the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea and as observed by practitioners on the ground. Eels have a lifespan of 15 to 20 years.
Reclassifying the eel under Appendix I would have serious repercussions on the French fisheries sector, including knock-on effects downstream, since it would entail a ban on the marketing of European eels for consumption and thus lead to the closure of certain artisanal fisheries, which nevertheless play a key role in restocking and stock recovery efforts. In addition, a total ban gives rise to concerns about the development of a sizeable black market.
- 1.In the interests of more transparent governance, does the Commission intend to present this initiative to all stakeholders, keep them informed of progress and continue its work in consultation with the professionals affected by this possible measure?
- 2.Will it assess the socio-economic consequences of reclassifying the eel in this way?
Submitted: 10.2.2025