Source: European Parliament
Priority question for written answer P-001105/2025
to the Commission
Rule 144
Waldemar Buda (ECR)
In view of the Polish Government’s position of 4 February 2025 regarding the refusal to implement the Migration Pact and the forced admission of migrants, and in view of the Commission’s answer to parliamentary question E-002557/2024[1], I would like to ask the following question:
Is the definition of temporary protection met by allowing a third-country national to enter the country to seek protection from war?
Since the number of people benefiting from temporary protection is an important factor in assessing whether a Member State is facing a significant migration situation, and since countries are free to choose between different forms of solidarity (relocation, financial contributions, etc.), please answer the following:
Is the definition of financial contributions met by the costs incurred through the payment of social benefits?
Please provide the methodology for assessing the risk of migratory pressure, being under migratory pressure, or facing a significant migratory situation.
Submitted: 14.3.2025
- [1] https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-10-2024-002557-ASW_EN.pdf