MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Refusal of The Barkley Club planning permission maintained as appeals are dismissed13 May 2025 The Assistant Minister for the Environment, Constable Mike Jackson, has upheld the refusal of planning permission for the use of land and proposals for new development at Field MN494, La Rue des Buttes,… Read more

Source: Channel Islands – Jersey

13 May 2025

The Assistant Minister for the Environment, Constable Mike Jackson, has upheld the refusal of planning permission for the use of land and proposals for new development at Field MN494, La Rue des Buttes, St Martin, for its use as a dog day care centre. 

This follows the outcome of two planning appeals submitted by The Barkley Club Ltd. 

The appeals related to: 

  • P/2024/0927: the refusal of planning permission for a dog day care centre, including the construction of an new building, car parking, and landscaping
  • ENF/2024/00016: the refusal of retrospective planning permission to change the use of the field for a dog care and training centre following the service of an enforcement notice requiring the cessation of this use. 

Both appeals concerned the entire Field MN494, located to the south of St Martin’s Village. 

Following an independent review by a planning inspector, the Assistant Minister accepted the inspector’s recommendations and dismissed both appeals. The enforcement notice has been upheld, with a revised compliance period of nine months granted to enable the cessation of all unauthorised activities on the site. 

Key Planning Considerations 

The planning inspector identified two principal issues: 

  1. The loss of high-quality agricultural land 
  2. The potential for noise generated by barking dogs to unreasonably impact the amenities of nearby residents. 

While the inspector acknowledged that the facility is professionally managed and meets a demand for dog care services, he concluded that these benefits did not outweigh the clear policy conflicts. The site is identified as good quality agricultural land the loss of which could only be justified in exceptional circumstances under the policies set out in the Island Plan. 

Outcome 

  • The appeal against the refusal of planning application P/2024/0927 has been dismissed 
  • The appeal against the refusal of retrospective planning permission to change the use of the field for a dog care and training centre has also been dismissed, and the enforcement notice (ENF/2024/00016) upheld but with a revised nine-month compliance period.​

MIL OSI United Kingdom