NewzIntel.com

    • Checkout Page
    • Contact Us
    • Default Redirect Page
    • Frontpage
    • Home-2
    • Home-3
    • Lost Password
    • Member Login
    • Member LogOut
    • Member TOS Page
    • My Account
    • NewzIntel Alert Control-Panel
    • NewzIntel Latest Reports
    • Post Views Counter
    • Privacy Policy
    • Public Individual Page
    • Register
    • Subscription Plan
    • Thank You Page

MIL-OSI United Kingdom: UN Human Rights Council 59: UK Closing Statement

Written by

MIL-OSI Publisher

in

AM-NC, CTF, DJF, Economy, Europe, European Union, KB, MIL-OSI, Politics, United Kingdom

Source: United Kingdom – Government Statements

World news story

UN Human Rights Council 59: UK Closing Statement

UK Closing Statement for the 59th session of the HRC. Delivered at HRC59 in Geneva.

Thank you, Mr President.

We would like to make closing remarks on three resolutions.

In respect of L.20, the UK’s commitment to the safety of journalists and media freedom is unwavering. In accordance with international law, surveillance or interference with encryption technologies must be necessary, proportionate and subject to proper safeguards. Without such safeguards, journalists’ lawful activities should not be investigated or interfered with – either domestically or extraterritorially. In the UK, our investigatory powers legislation protects journalistic freedom by including specific safeguards for confidential journalistic material.

In respect of resolution L.17 on climate change, the UK is concerned that the significance of the Paris Agreement is inadequately reflected. We emphasise that the Paris Agreement is a freestanding treaty and not an annex to the Framework Convention. The UK is fully committed to the Paris Agreement, which urges all parties to tackle climate change in light of different national circumstances.  

Human rights must be respected and protected when taking action to address climate change. However, climate finance, debt relief, climate justice and technology transfer are not prerequisites to the realisation of international human rights obligations.  International human rights law does not recognise the concept of common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities, which is specific only to certain international environmental treaties.

Finally, with respect to L.8, the UK has long been a supporter of better and more affordable access to medicines in low- and middle-income countries. However, to maximise the prospects of successfully and sustainably achieving this, technology transfer needs to be on voluntary and mutually agreed terms. The UK has consistently raised its concerns about the phrase “unhindered access” in this and other fora. 

The UK thanks the core groups for their constructive engagement on these resolutions.

Thank you.

Share this page

The following links open in a new tab

  • Share on Facebook (opens in new tab)
  • Share on Twitter (opens in new tab)

Updates to this page

Published 10 July 2025

MIL OSI United Kingdom –

←MIL-OSI Russia: Career Trajectory “Intern”: Polytechnic University Raises New Generation of Teachers
MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Council visits around 2,000 tenants in an intensive week of activity to offer support→

More posts

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: World News in Brief: First UN mission to Syria’s Sweida, fresh displacement in Haiti, new lightning record

    August 5, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Canada: Edmonton resident charged with drug importation

    August 5, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Schakowsky, Markey, Ruiz, Jayapal Introduce Dr. Paul Farmer Memorial Resolution Outlining 21st Century Global Health Strategy 

    August 5, 2025
  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Minister announces SOE appointments

    August 5, 2025
NewzIntel.com

NewzIntel.com

MIL Open Source Intelligence

  • Blog
  • About
  • FAQs
  • Authors
  • Events
  • Shop
  • Patterns
  • Themes

Twenty Twenty-Five

Designed with WordPress