NewzIntel.com

Blog

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Suspicious under-reporting of nosocomial infections in Romanian hospitals – E-002315/2024(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The prevalence of healthcare-associated infections (HAI) reported by Romanian hospitals in the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control’s (ECDC) point prevalence surveys (PPS)[1] is indeed low: 2.8% (second lowest) in 2011-2012[2], 3.6% (fourth lowest) in 2016-2017[3], and 3.1% (second lowest) in 2022-2023[4].

    Some degree of under-reporting may be possible, as shown by the data on patient case-mix (severity of the clinical condition of hospitalised patients) in the PPS sample from Romania and the results of the validation of this and previous PPS, but the extent of under-reporting cannot be quantified.

    The low reported prevalence of HAI can also be partly explained by the very low diagnostic testing in Romanian hospitals (third lowest in 2016-2017 and second lowest in 2022-2023), indicating that some HAI may remain undiagnosed because diagnostic tests are not performed.

    In accordance with Article 7(1) of Regulation (EU) 2022/2371[5], Member States must provide a report on their prevention, preparedness and response planning for serious cross-border health threats, which includes their national capacities related to HAI surveillance.

    ECDC periodically assesses the Member States’ prevention, preparedness and response planning at national level under Article 8 of Regulation (EU) 2022/2371.

    Such an assessment[6] is scheduled to take place in Romania in 2026. In any case, the Commission remains in contact with the relevant Romanian authorities.

    Based on the information provided by the Member States and the results of the assessments carried out by ECDC, the Commission shall produce a report on the state of play and progress and may support the action of the Member States through general recommendations on prevention, preparedness and response planning.

    • [1] https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/search?s=Point+prevalence+survey
    • [2] https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/point-prevalence-survey-healthcare-associated-infections-and-antimicrobial-use-0
    • [3] https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/point-prevalence-survey-healthcare-associated-infections-and-antimicrobial-use-5
    • [4] https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/PPS-HAI-AMR-acute-care-europe-2022-2023
    • [5] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2371/oj
    • [6] https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/about-ecdc/what-we-do/public-health-emergency-preparedness-assessments

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Violations of EU law in the import and trade of used goods vehicles in Greece – E-002490/2024(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission has assessed the Greek legislation imposing new rules for imported used vehicles in Greece.

    Provided that the new licencing procedure is applicable for all used heavy-duty vehicles, domestic or imported, and is thus non-discriminatory, the choice of the environmental standard EURO 6D as a condition for granting the permission to perform public transport services is regulated under national law and does not appear to be in breach of EU law.

    From a general point of view, where a second-hand (used) vehicle is imported from another Member State and is covered by an EU type-approval issued pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2018/858[1], the authorities of the Member States must recognise the vehicle approval and the registration certificate, without carrying out additional checks[2].

    A Member State does not have discretion not to recognise such a vehicle, save in specific cases where there is a presumption of fraud or alteration; without however duplicating controls which have been carried out in the context of other procedures, either in the same or in another Member State.

    Member States must duly justify any additional requirements for the registration of an imported vehicle from another Member State in a (new) dedicated domestic register, for the electronic submission of a number of documents within a limited period of time from the date of the application, or for the provision of additional roadworthiness certificate, and/or a copy of the certificate of conformity of the vehicle, at a certain cost.

    Addition requirements shall be limited to cases where such controls are necessary and proportionate to the objective pursued.

    • [1] Regulation (EU) 2018/858 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 on the approval and market surveillance of motor vehicles and their trailers, and of systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles, amending Regulations (EC) No 715/2007 and (EC) No 595/2009 and repealing Directive 2007/46/EC, OJ L 151, 14.6.2018, p. 1-218.
    • [2] Article 4 and Article 5(2) of Council Directive 1999/37/EC of 29 April 1999 on the registration documents for vehicles, OJ L 138, 1.6.1999, p. 57-65.
    Last updated: 6 February 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Loneliness in the EU – E-002640/2024(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    There have been several efforts to collect data on loneliness in recent years. In 2022, the Commission conducted the first EU-wide survey on loneliness, with findings available on the Commission’s website[1].

    In 2018 and 2022, the EU survey on income and living conditions included variables on quality of life, such as social contacts and the feeling of being left out.

    These variables will be included again in the 2028 survey, with results published on the online database of the Statistical Office of the EU (Eurostat)[2].

    Additionally, under the current Horizon Europe framework programme for research and innovation[3], the Commission is funding a coordination and support action dedicated to loneliness[4].

    This project, set to launch in early 2025, aims to identify, organise, and integrate publicly accessible datasets on loneliness, contributing evidence on loneliness and effective interventions[5].

    Loneliness significantly impacts mental health. The Commission, through its flagship initiatives of the communication on a comprehensive approach to mental health[6], supports Member States[7] in identifying best practices and improving prevention strategies for mental health issues, especially for vulnerable populations. Loneliness will also be an important angle considered in the elaboration of the intergenerational fairness strategy.

    Finally, in her political guidelines[8] for the new Commission mandate, the President of the Commission announced an EU-wide inquiry into how social media affects well-being.

    Loneliness is a critical factor in this context. To lay the groundwork for a future EU-wide longitudinal study on social media use, loneliness, and well-being, the Commission will conduct a pilot survey to explore social media’s role in loneliness among adolescents.

    • [1] https://joint-research-centre.ec.europa.eu/scientific-activities-z/survey-methods-and-analysis-centre-smac/loneliness_en
    • [2] Indicators on social contacts and feeling left out are published in the Eurostat Online Database: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/main/data/database
    • [3] https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/funding/funding-opportunities/funding-programmes-and-open-calls/horizon-europe_en
    • [4] https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/portal/screen/opportunities/topic-details/horizon-cl2-2024-transformations-01-01
    • [5] The project is entitled ‘The loneliness and social isolation in Europe Network: Evidence-based policy recommendation on its causes, consequences and monitoring’.
    • [6] https://health.ec.europa.eu/publications/comprehensive-approach-mental-health_en
    • [7] https://mentalhealthandwellbeing.eu/the-joint-action/
    • [8] https://commission.europa.eu/document/download/e6cd4328-673c-4e7a-8683-f63ffb2cf648_en?filename=Political%20Guidelines%202024-2029_EN.pdf

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Exporting ferrous scrap and the ensuing impact on the competitiveness of the EU steel industry – E-002520/2024(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    1. The Commission is aware of the concerns expressed by stakeholders regarding the availability of ferrous scrap within the EU and its potential impact on the competitiveness of the steel industry. The Commission is currently exploring various measures to ensure a stable supply and demand of ferrous scrap for EU production facilities. This includes enhancing the internal market for secondary raw materials and promoting recycling within the EU. It also includes continued monitoring of the development and functioning of these markets to ensure healthy competitive conditions. The revised EU Waste Shipment Regulation[1] sets out stricter rules on the export of waste to non-EU countries, notably requiring better monitoring and treatment of waste in an environmentally sustainable manner.

    2. Ferrous scrap is a highly valuable secondary raw material that can avoid millions of tons of carbon dioxide emissions, and as such, the Commission recognises the strategic importance of ensuring that sufficient ferrous scrap is available. In the context of the upcoming Circular Economy Act, the Commission is also considering potential ways to create incentives for a higher share of ferrous scrap to be used in steel production in the EU. The Commission will continue to monitor the situation and engage with stakeholders to find solutions that support the competitiveness, economic security and decarbonisation of the EU steel industry.

    • [1] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1157/oj
    Last updated: 6 February 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Protecting the competitiveness of the European cement industry – E-002800/2024(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) will ensure that the carbon price of cement imported into the EU is equivalent to the carbon price of domestic production under the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS).

    Under the EU ETS, the number of free emission allowances declines over time for all sectors. For CBAM sectors like cement, the decline accelerates as from 2026 to maximise the impact of the ETS in fulfilling the EU’s climate goals.

    In line with the phase-out of the allocation of free allowances under the EU ETS, the CBAM financial adjustment is phased in gradually.

    As required by the CBAM Regulation, a report on the application of the CBAM is foreseen in 2025 before the end of the transitional phase[1].

    In view of the expiration of the Autonomous Trade Measures for Ukraine in June 2025, the Commission is working on a review of reciprocal trade liberalisation under Article 29 of the Association Agreement.

    However, since cement was already fully liberalised by the original Association Agreement, it was not affected by the Autonomous Trade Measures nor is it within the scope of the review.

    The Commission is aware of the challenges that companies and households face due to high energy prices. The EU has jointly responded to Russia’s energy market manipulation and the subsequent high inflation.

    The energy dimension of the Clean Industrial Deal and the forthcoming Action Plan for Affordable Energy will address the high energy prices and aim at unlocking all possible decarbonisation pathways for EU industries. Further fuel switches and energy efficiency improvements can also help to reduce energy costs.

    • [1] Regulation (EU) 2023/956, Article 30(2).
    Last updated: 6 February 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – UN’s CERD acting beyond its remit on school curricula – E-002627/2024(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD) is the body of independent experts that monitors implementation of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination[1] (ICERD) by its state parties.

    The Committee issued on 21 December 2023 its concluding observations[2] on the combined 23rd to 26th reports of Germany, as state party to the ICERD.

    The Committee subsequently published on 11 December 2024 the information received from Germany[3] on follow-up to CERD concluding observations.

    This process is in line with the reporting obligations of state parties; states that have ratified the ICERD are required to submit regular reports to the Committee, detailing the progress in upholding the rights described in the Convention and measures taken to implement it.

    CERD examines these reports and issues recommendations on the implementation of the ICERD in that state — including in the area of education as per Article 7 of the ICERD: ‘States Parties undertake to adopt immediate and effective measures, particularly in the fields of teaching, education, culture and information, with a view to combating prejudices which lead to racial discrimination’.

    The EU remains a staunch supporter of the United Nations (UN) human rights system, including the independence of the treaty bodies responsible for monitoring the implementation of human rights treaties, as well as their independent mandate.

    Council Conclusions on EU Priorities in UN Human Rights Fora in 2024[4] reaffirmed that the EU ‘will continue calling on all states to fully engage with the UN human rights system, including the Human Rights Council and its mechanisms, such as the Special Procedures and the Universal Periodic Review, UN-mandated investigative bodies and the Treaty Bodies’.

    • [1] https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-convention-elimination-all-forms-racial
    • [2] https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/4033353?v=pdf
    • [3] https://documents.un.org/doc/undoc/gen/g24/226/22/pdf/g2422622.pdf
    • [4] https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-5311-2024-INIT/en/pdf
    Last updated: 6 February 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – The dangerous possibility of a Turkish-Syrian maritime zone agreement – P-000006/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The fall of Assad’s criminal regime marks a historic moment for the Syrian people. The European Council of 19 December 2024[1] stressed the historic opportunity to reunite and rebuild the country and underlined the importance of an inclusive and Syrian-led political process that meets the legitimate aspirations of the Syrian people, in line with the core principles of United Nations (UN) Security Council Resolution 2254.

    In this respect, the EU supports the work of the UN Special Envoy for Syria. Syria’s independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity within secure borders should be fully respected, in accordance with international law.

    This was also the agreement reached in Aqaba[2] on 14 December 2024 on common principles[3] for the international community’s engagement in support of the Syrian people in this unprecedented transition.

    The EU has a strategic interest in a stable and secure environment in the Eastern Mediterranean and in the development of a cooperative and mutually beneficial relationship with Türkiye.

    In this context, the EU continues to expect Türkiye to respect the sovereignty and the sovereign rights of all Member States, in accordance with international law, including the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea[4] and to unequivocally commit to and promote good neighbourly relations and the peaceful settlement of disputes, having recourse, if necessary, to the International Court of Justice.

    The European Council conclusions of 12 December 2019[5] clearly stated that the Türkiye-Libya memorandum of understanding on the delimitation of maritime jurisdictions in the Mediterranean Sea[6] infringes upon the sovereign rights of third states, does not comply with the Law of the Sea and cannot produce any legal consequences for third States.

    • [1] https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/jhlenhaj/euco-conclusions-19122024-en.pdf
    • [2] https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/press-statement-eu-high-representative-foreign-affairs-and-security-policy-following-international_en
    • [3] https://www.diplomatie.gouv.fr/en/country-files/syria/news/2024/article/joint-statement-on-syria-14-dec-2024
    • [4] https://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/unclos_e.pdf
    • [5] https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/41768/12-euco-final-conclusions-en.pdf
    • [6] https://www.un.org/depts/los/LEGISLATIONANDTREATIES/PDFFILES/TREATIES/Turkey_11122019_(HC)_MoU_Libya-Delimitation-areas-Mediterranean.pdf
    Last updated: 6 February 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Frontex contracts with HawkEye 360 – E-002716/2024(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    As the question regarding ‘Frontex contracts with HawkEye 360’ falls entirely under the responsibility of the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex), the Commission has asked the Agency to provide an answer to the questions raised by the Honourable Member.

    The Agency’s reply will be sent to the Honourable Member by the Commission as soon as possible.

    Last updated: 6 February 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Introduction of tariffs on fertilisers from Russia and Belarus to protect EU producers from unfair competition and workers from losing their jobs – P-002696/2024(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission is closely monitoring the situation regarding the import of fertilisers into the EU from Russia and Belarus.

    While reflecting on possible new measures, upholding food security remains among EU’s primary consideration. Any measure should contribute to preserve a competitive EU fertilisers industry, reduce dependencies while also ensuring that EU farmers have access to ample and diverse sources of fertilisers.

    It is worth mentioning that some fertilisers types, albeit not urea or nitrogen fertilisers, are also subject to restrictions under EU sanctions, i.e. a quota on imports of potash fertilisers from Russia[1] and a ban on Belarus[2].

    Where there is unfair competition stemming from imports, the EU uses trade defence instruments to restore fair competition. There are anti-dumping measures in place on imports of mixtures of urea and ammonium nitrate from, inter alia, Russia[3] which are currently subject to an expiry review.

    There are also measures in place on ammonium nitrate from Russia. Where measures are no longer effective, they may be reviewed.

    The trade defence process is normally driven by complaints or requests from industry giving evidence of unfairly dumped or subsidised imports of products or showing that there are changes of a lasting nature which require a change to existing measures. EU industry should contact the complaints office of Directorate-General for Trade for advice.

    • [1] Article 3i of Council Regulation 833/2014; https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A02014R0833-20241217
    • [2] Article 1i of Council Regulation 765/2006; https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A02006R0765-20241216
    • [3] Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1688 of 8 October 2019; https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32019R1688
    Last updated: 6 February 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Aerial surveillance by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) with drones and aircraft (2024) – E-003049/2024(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    As the question regarding ‘Aerial surveillance by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) with drones and aircraft (2024)’ falls entirely under the responsibility of Frontex, the Commission has asked the Agency to provide an answer to the questions raised by the Honourable Member.

    The Agency’s reply will be sent to the Honourable Member by the Commission as soon as possible.

    Last updated: 6 February 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Financing activities on LGBTQ+ issues with EU funds – E-002551/2024(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Erasmus+ programme seeks to promote equal opportunities and access, inclusiveness, diversity and fairness across all its actions.

    The programme guide[1] and grant agreement[2] highlight that projects need to respect human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law and respect for human rights, including the rights of persons belonging to minorities, in full compliance with the values and rights enshrined in the EU Treaties and in the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights[3].

    In addition to the above-mentioned criteria, funded initiatives must meet, applicable eligibility, admissibility, exclusion and selection criteria outlined in the Erasmus+ programme guide.

    The Commission does not specifically track lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer or questioning (LGBTQ+)-related activities in EU-funded projects.

    Furthermore, the guide sets clear standards for the protection, health and safety of participants, including minors. Learning must take place in a safe environment, which respects and protects the rights of all people.

    Participating organisations must have in place effective procedures to guarantee the safety, protection and non-discrimination of participants.

    The Commission contacted the national agency in charge of the selection and monitoring of the project in question to ensure that the above-mentioned criteria are respected.

    The national agency confirmed that the rules set out in the Erasmus+ programme guide and grant agreement are respected, including obtaining written parental consent prior to the participation of minors, and a comprehensive safeguarding policy set up by the beneficiary.

    • [1] https://erasmus-plus.ec.europa.eu/document/erasmus-programme-guide-2025-version-1?pk_source=website&pk_medium=link&pk_campaign=pg&pk_content=pg-landing-download
    • [2] https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/docs/2021-2027/erasmus/agr-contr/unit-mga_erasmus_en.pdf
    • [3] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:12012P/TXT

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Building codes (eurocodes) in construction and a special mandate to the JRC to help introduce building codes in Malta – P-002974/2024(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    1. National building codes define the performance of buildings and civil engineering works and are a national responsibility for setting performance levels and enforcing these regulations. The Eurocodes set no performance requirements but are technical European standards providing a framework for calculating structural design. They are the means to support modernisation and harmonisation in structural design for buildings and infrastructure. Their use is voluntary for Member States and countries outside the EU.

    In 2014-2015, the Commission performed an enquiry on the implementation of the Eurocodes in the Member States and Norway. The analysis[1] concluded that in 83% of the analysed countries the Eurocodes are implemented; At the same time, faster progress in adoption of national annexes[2] was expected from Malta.

    2. In the 2014-2015 enquiry, the National Standards Body of Malta reported that all Eurocodes parts were published as national standards in Malta, their use was voluntary and national annexes to the Eurocodes were not yet published. However, the national annexes on the most important Eurocodes parts were available for public comment.

    3. The Commission has long experience in supporting the implementation and practical use of the Eurocodes at the technical level, including through training and capacity building for national authorities, national standards bodies, academia and practitioners. A wealth of information and open-access background documents is available at the Eurocodes website[3]. The Commission will continue to support the implementation and use of the upcoming second-generation Eurocodes[4], expected to be published in 2027, and remains available to discuss specific needs for support.

    • [1] https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2788/854939
    • [2] https://eurocodes.jrc.ec.europa.eu/en-eurocodes/eurocodes-national-implementation
    • [3] https://eurocodes.jrc.ec.europa.eu
    • [4] https://eurocodes.jrc.ec.europa.eu/second-generation-eurocodes
    Last updated: 6 February 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Standardisation and interoperability of alarm and communication systems in lifts – E-002745/2024(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Lifts Directive (2014/33/EU)[1] requires that ‘cars must be fitted with two-way means of communication allowing permanent contact with a rescue service’. The two European harmonised standards[2] cited in the Official Journal in support of the Lifts Directive have relevant clauses.

    To date, the Commission has no evidence on the existence of safety or interoperability issues related to the emergency call systems. The Commission is currently undertaking an evaluation of the Lifts Directive[3] and would welcome any information in this respect[4].

    • [1] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32014L0033
    • [2] EN 81-20:2020 Part 20: ‘Passenger and goods passenger lifts’ and EN 81-28:2003: ‘Remote alarm on passenger and goods passenger lifts’.
    • [3] https://single-market-economy.ec.europa.eu/sectors/mechanical-engineering/lifts_en
    • [4] GROW-LIFTS@ec.europa.eu .
    Last updated: 6 February 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Delivering on the European green agenda and monitoring the wind farm shutdown to prevent irreversible environmental damage – E-002511/2024(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission takes note of the court rulings in Galicia mentioned by the Honourable Member. In line with Article 6(3) of the Habitats Directive[1], the Commission reminds that any project which is likely to have a significant effect on a Natura 2000 must be subject to an appropriate assessment of its implications for the site in view of the site’s conservation objectives.

    The competent national authorities can agree to the project only after having ascertained that it will not adversely affect the integrity of the site.

    According to Article 6(4) of the Habitats Directive, if despite a negative assessment and in the absence of alternative solutions, a project must nevertheless be carried out for imperative reasons of overriding public interest, the Member State must take all compensatory measures necessary to ensure that the overall coherence of the Natura 2000 network is protected.

    Lastly, according to the information available to the Commission, no EU funding from the Cohesion Funds, the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) or the Spanish Recovery and Resilience Plan was provided to the suspended wind farms in Galicia.

    • [1] Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora, OJ L 206, 22.7.1992, p. 7-50.
    Last updated: 6 February 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Beach concessions – E-002323/2024(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    1. The applicability of Directive 2006/123/EC[1] (the Services Directive) to authorisations for the use of state-owned coastal properties for leisure and touristic activities (so called beach concessions) was clarified by the Court of Justice of the European Union on 14 July 2016[2] and, more recently, on 20 April 2023[3]. No amendments or supplements to the Services Directive are foreseen in this respect.

    2. It should be recalled, first, that, in accordance with Article 12(2) of the Services Directive, no advantage to incumbents shall be provided at the moment of assigning beach concessions, whatever their size. However, the Commission is of course in support of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), in general, and will therefore monitor that the application of the national laws in this sector does not pose barriers that could prevent all interested providers, particularly SMEs, from taking full advantage of economic opportunities in the internal market.

    • [1] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32006L0123
    • [2] Judgment of 14 July 2016, Promoimpresa srl and Others v Consorzio dei comuni della Sponda Bresciana del Lago di Garda e del Lago di Idro and Others, Joined Cases C-458/14 and C-67/15, EU:C:2016:558.
    • [3] Judgment of 20 April 2023, Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (Commune de Ginosa), C-348/22, EU:C:2023:301.
    Last updated: 6 February 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Highlights – Study: Role of the longevity economy in the tourism sector – Committee on Transport and Tourism

    Source: European Parliament

    Two old persons on Train Station © Image used under the license from Adobe Stock

    This study offers a comprehensive overview of silver tourism in the EU, detailing the sector’s current state and otential growth opportunities. It establishes a conceptual framework that categorises key areas within silver tourism and examines specific challenges and opportunities within each. The study concludes with targeted recommendations to address these challenges.

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Latest news – Next meeting: 13 February 2025 – ordinary meeting – Delegation to the Africa-EU Parliamentary Assembly

    Source: European Parliament

    On Thursday, 13 February 2025 (10.00-11.30), the DAFR delegation will hold a meeting in Strasbourg (DE MADARIAGA S5) on the risk of the regionalisation of the conflict in Eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC).
    The meeting will be webstreamed.

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Security: Fentanyl Distributor Is Sentenced To Seven Years In Prison

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    CHARLOTTE, N.C. – Ryan Rudy Elledge, 30, of Sherrills Ford, N.C., was sentenced today to 84 months in prison and four years of supervised release for distributing fentanyl, announced Dena J. King, U.S. Attorney for the Western District of North Carolina.

    Bennie Mims, Special Agent in Charge of the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), Charlotte Field Division, Sheriff Donald G. Brown II of the Catawba County Sheriff’s Office, and Chief Tyler Whisenant of the Maiden Police Department, join U.S. Attorney King in making today’s announcement.

    According to court documents and proceedings, law enforcement began investigating Elledge in January 2023, for suspected fentanyl distribution in and around Catawba County. On February 17, 2023, officers executed a search warrant at Elledge’s residence, seizing more than 71 grams of fentanyl and over $21,000 in cash. In February 2024, law enforcement began a second investigation, after learning that Elledge was selling drugs again from his home in Newton, N.C. On February 22, 2024, a confidential informant purchased fentanyl and other narcotics from Elledge. The following day, officers executed a search warrant at Elledge’s residence, seizing fentanyl and methamphetamine. Court records show that Elledge admitted to distributing more than a kilogram of fentanyl and over 200 grams of methamphetamine.

    On August 20, 2024, Elledge pleaded guilty to conspiracy to distribute and to possess with intent to distribute fentanyl, and possession with intent to distribute fentanyl. He is currently in federal custody and will be transferred to the custody of the Federal Bureau of Prisons upon designation of a federal facility.

    In making today’s announcement, U.S. Attorney King thanked the ATF, the Catawba County Sheriff’s Office, and the Maiden Police Department for their investigation of the case.

    Assistant U.S. Attorney Alfredo De La Rosa with the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Charlotte prosecuted the case. 

    MIL Security OSI –

  • MIL-OSI Security: Native Of Mexico Indicted On Illegal Reentry Charge

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    HARRISBURG – The United States Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Pennsylvania announced that Eustolio Sanchez-Ramirez, age 38, of Chiapas, Mexico, was indicted on February 5, 2025, by a federal grand jury on a charge of Illegal Reentry.         

    According to Acting United States Attorney John C. Gurganus, the indictment alleges that on or about December 19, 2024, Sanchez-Ramirez was found in Dauphin County Pennsylvania after previously having been removed from the United States. The indictment also alleges that Sanchez-Ramirez had been removed from the United States through Brownsville, Texas, and reentered without first obtaining legal permission to do so. 

    The case was investigated by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) and the Harrisburg Police Department. Assistant U.S. Attorney David C. Williams is prosecuting the case.

    The maximum penalty under federal law for this offense is two years of imprisonment, a term of supervised release following imprisonment, and a fine. A sentence following a finding of guilt is imposed by the Judge after consideration of the applicable federal sentencing statutes and the Federal Sentencing Guidelines.

    Indictments are only allegations. All persons charged are presumed to be innocent unless and until found guilty in court.

    # # 

    MIL Security OSI –

  • MIL-OSI Security: Long Island-Based Bloods Gang Members Charged With Attempted Murders, Armed Robberies, Firearms Trafficking and Fraud in Second Superseding Indictment

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    Earlier today in federal court in Central Islip, three Bloods gang members, Dwayne Murray, Kendrick Seymore and Lavalle Wilson, were arraigned on new charges in a 46-count second superseding indictment before United States District Judge Joan M. Azrack.  That indictment also charges an additional defendant, high-ranking Bloods gang member Sheim Tevin Ramsey-Davis (Ramsey-Davis), with racketeering and racketeering conspiracy, violent crimes in-aid-of racketeering, brandishing and discharging a firearm during a crime of violence, robbery, fraud and narcotics trafficking. Ramsey-Davis was arrested on January 30, 2025, in Augusta, Georgia and will be arraigned in the Eastern District of New York at a later date. 

    The second superseding indictment includes the following new charges against Murray, Seymore and Wilson for crimes they allegedly committed in Suffolk County between 2016 and 2022:

    • Murray is charged with a September 26, 2016 attempted murder; a May 28, 2020 attempted murder; a May 2020 gunpoint robbery; and firearms trafficking. Murray was previously charged with the June 12, 2020 murder of Wayne Cherry and Seymore was previously charged with the July 23, 2021 execution-style murders of Nyasia Knox, Diamond Schick and Richard Castano.       
    • Seymore is charged with a May 2020 gunpoint robbery; an October 23, 2020 armed home invasion robbery; a September 25, 2021 armed home invasion robbery; and an October 1, 2021 attempted armed home invasion robbery.
    • Murray and Wilson are charged with conspiring with other members of the gang to defraud victims of significant amounts of money between 2020 and 2022. 

    John J. Durham, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York; Raymond A. Tierney, Suffolk County District Attorney; James E. Dennehy, Assistant Director in Charge, Federal Bureau of Investigation, New York Field Office (FBI); Bryan Miller, Special Agent in Charge, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, New York Field Office (ATF NY); and Kevin Catalina, Commissioner, Suffolk County Police Department (SCPD), announced the arrest and charges.

    “With these new and very serious charges, law enforcement continues its objective of dismantling the Bloods on Long Island, and of prosecuting gang members who are drivers of gun violence and numerous other crimes in Suffolk County,” stated United States Attorney Durham.  “My Office and our federal and local partners will not relent in our efforts to remove this threat in order to make our communities safer.” 

    Mr. Durham expressed his appreciation to the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Georgia and FBI’s Resident Agency in Augusta, Georgia, for their assistance with the case.

    “The crimes alleged here strike at the very fabric of our community through violence, intimidation and corruption. Each count in this indictment, from murder to firearms trafficking, represents not just a crime, but a family traumatized, a neighborhood living in fear, or young people pulled into a cycle of violence,” stated Suffolk County District Attorney Tierney.  “My office will continue working alongside our federal and local partners to dismantle all such criminal enterprises and restore safety to the communities they have terrorized.”

    FBI Assistant Director in Charge Dennehy stated: “These three gang members allegedly engaged in an array of criminal activity –murders, armed robberies, and narcotics trafficking – designed to bolster their financial and internal social statuses as well as punish rival entities. This series of new charges emphasizes the various extreme measures the defendants will allegedly implement to support their gang’s operations. Alongside our law enforcement partners, the FBI remains steadfast in its mission to eradicate the gang violence and criminality polluting our communities.”

    “This indictment underscores the collective commitment with ATF NY and our law enforcement partners,” stated ATF NY Special Agent in Charge Miller. “Dismantling violent gangs that terrorize our communities and threaten public safety remain a top priority. It is our obligation to bring every resource to bear in the face of brazen acts of violence. We remain fully committed to enhancing public safety through identifying and eliminating the key drivers of violence. Thank you to the efforts of the men and women of ATF NY Long Island Joint Firearms Task Force, FBI, Suffolk County Police Department and EDNY.”

    “These defendants have terrorized the community for years, committing a spree of violent crimes,” stated SCPD Commissioner Catalina.  “It is through the diligent work of investigators from multiple agencies that we are able to levy new charges. The department along with our law enforcement partners remains committed to working together to fight the brutality of gang members.”

    As alleged in court filings, the defendants engaged in numerous acts of violence on behalf of the Bloods gang, including robberies, home invasions, numerous shootings and four murders.  The defendants are members of a Bloods set known as the Gorilla Stone Bloods (GSB), which have “kaves” located in various towns on Long Island.  Murray and Ramsey-Davis were the leaders of the “Money Gang Kave.”  The second superseding indictment adds charges stemming from the defendants’ years-long use of violence to target their rivals and armed robberies to enrich the members of the gang.

    Specifically, on September 26, 2016, Murray, who was the leader of a set of the Bloods, shot a victim multiple times to increase his own status within the Bloods.  On May 28, 2020, Ramsey-Davis, at Murray’s direction, fired numerous shots at two individuals believed to be associated with a rival gang who were seated in a parked car in front of a residence in Bellport. Murray, Seymore and Ramsey-Davis, along with other gang members, also routinely scouted lucrative robbery targets and committed several armed robberies and home invasions in Suffolk County in 2020 and 2021.  In addition, Ramsey-Davis and his co-conspirators sold large amounts of narcotics, including fentanyl. They also engaged in numerous fraud schemes, including identity theft, credit card and bank fraud and defrauding state unemployment systems. Ramsey-Davis also purchased and sold firearms, and supplied lower-level members of the gang with guns. 

    Previously, Murray and Seymore were charged with racketeering, murder, attempted murder, firearms offenses and narcotics trafficking, and Wilson was charged with attempted murder, firearms offenses and narcotics trafficking. 

    The charges in the second superseding indictment are allegations, and the defendants are presumed to be innocent unless and until proven guilty. 

    The government’s case is being handled by the Criminal Section of the Office’s Long Island Division.  Assistant United States Attorneys Mark E. Misorek and Andrew P. Wenzel and Special Assistant United States Attorneys Donald N. Barclay and Dena C. Rizopoulos are in charge of the prosecution, along with Paralegal Specialist Dejah Turla.

    The Defendants:

    DWAYNE MURRAY (also known as “Wayno”)
    Age:  33
    Residence: Coram, Long Island

    SHEIM TEVIN RAMSEY-DAVIS (also known as “KG”)
    Age:  26
    Residence: Augusta, Georgia

    KENDRICK SEYMORE (also known as “KR”)
    Age:  22
    Residence: Coram, Long Island   

    LAVALLE WILSON (also known as “Val,” Skip,” “Flip” and “Wes”)
    Age:  30
    Residence: Shirley, Long Island   

    E.D.N.Y. Docket No. 22-CR-401 (S-2) (JMA)

    MIL Security OSI –

  • MIL-OSI Security: Luzerne County Man Sentenced To 188 Months in Prison for Conspiring to Distribute Fentanyl and Methamphetamine

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

     SCRANTON – The United States Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Pennsylvania announced that Anthony Jordan Vega, age 29, of Hazleton, Pennsylvania, was sentenced on February 4, 2025, by United States District Court Judge Robert D. Mariani to 188 months’ imprisonment to be followed by five years of supervised release for conspiring to distribute, and distribution of fentanyl and other controlled substances.

    According to Acting United States Attorney John C. Gurganus, Vega was involved in a conspiracy to distribute fentanyl and other controlled substances throughout Lackawanna and Luzerne Counties beginning in January 2022 until the time of his arrest on April 20, 2023.  The investigation revealed that Vega managed a network of drug traffickers and utilized co-conspirators to facilitate drug orders and drug distributions.  After a series of undercover purchases of controlled substances from Vega and others beginning in February through March 2023, Vega was arrested on April 20, 2023.  At the time of his arrest, Vega attempted to obstruct justice by directing the concealment of approximately 5,000 bags of fentanyl and other contraband located in a stash house in Hazleton.  The obstruction attempt and managerial role were taken into consideration at sentencing.

    Vega was indicted by a grand jury in Scranton on April 18, 2023, along with Alex Hernandez, age 25, also from Hazleton and a member of Vega’s conspiracy.  Vega appeared in federal court in Scranton on July 19, 2024, and plead guilty to conspiracy to distribute and distribution of fentanyl and methamphetamine.  Hernandez was previously sentenced to 10 years’ imprisonment for his role in the conspiracy.

    The charges stem from a joint investigation involving the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in Scranton – Safe Streets Task Force, and the Pennsylvania State Police.  Assistant United States Attorney Michelle Olshefski prosecuted the case.

    This case was brought as part of a district wide initiative to combat the nationwide epidemic regarding the use and distribution of heroin and fentanyl. Led by the United States Attorney’s Office, the Heroin Initiative targets heroin traffickers operating in the Middle District of Pennsylvania and is part of a coordinated effort among federal, state and local law enforcement agencies to locate, apprehend, and prosecute individuals who commit heroin related offenses.

    This case is also part of Project Safe Neighborhoods (PSN), a program bringing together all levels of law enforcement and the communities they serve to reduce violent crime and gun violence, and to make our neighborhoods safer for everyone. On May 26, 2021, the Department launched a violent crime reduction strategy strengthening PSN based on these core principles: fostering trust and legitimacy in our communities, supporting community-based organizations that help prevent violence from occurring in the first place, setting focused and strategic enforcement priorities, and measuring the results.

    ###

    MIL Security OSI –

  • MIL-OSI: Skyline Bankshares, Inc. Announces Fourth Quarter 2024 Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    FLOYD, Va. and INDEPENDENCE, Va., Feb. 06, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Skyline Bankshares, Inc. (the “Company”) (OTC QX: SLBK) – the holding company for Skyline National Bank (the “Bank”) – announced its results of operations for the fourth quarter of 2024.

    As previously announced, the Company acquired Johnson County Bank (“JCB”) on September 1, 2024, with the Company as the surviving corporation. For accounting purposes, the Company is considered the acquiror and JCB is considered the acquiree in the transaction. As such, all information contained herein as of and for periods prior to September 1, 2024 reflects the operations of the Company prior to the merger.

    The Company recorded net income of $2.5 million, or $0.45 per share, for the quarter ended December 31, 2024, compared to net income of $1.1 million, or $0.19 per share, for the third quarter of 2024 and net income of $2.2 million, or $0.39 per share, for the same period in 2023. For the year ended December 31, 2024, net income was $7.4 million, or $1.34 per share, compared to net income of $9.7 million, or $1.74 per share, for the year ended December 31, 2023. Fourth quarter 2024 earnings represented an annualized return on average assets (“ROAA”) of 0.82% and an annualized return on average equity (“ROAE”) of 11.23%, compared to 0.83% and 11.05%, respectively, for the same period last year. Excluding nonrecurring merger-related expenses of $923 thousand relating to the acquisition of Johnson County Bank, net income would have been $3.2 million, or $0.58 per share, for the fourth quarter of 2024. This would represent an annualized ROAA and ROAE of 1.06% and 14.54%, respectively, for the fourth quarter of 2024.

    President and CEO Blake Edwards stated, “The fourth quarter of 2024 was marked by many notable accomplishments. Earnings were strong, especially when adjusted for direct merger-related costs, with an adjusted annualized ROAA of 1.06%. During the quarter our core loan growth was $31.4 million, which is an annualized rate of 13.13%. Our net interest income increased in both the three-month and twelve-month periods ended December 31, 2024, while our net interest margin increased to 4.10% for the quarter ended December 31, 2024, compared to 3.78% for the quarter ended September 30, 2024. Net income also increased from the third to the fourth quarter when adjusted for nonrecurring, merger-related costs.”

    Edwards continued, “We continued the integration of Johnson County Bank during the fourth quarter of 2024 with the core data systems conversion completed in November. Our experienced team worked tirelessly to make this transition as seamless as possible for the Johnson County employees and customers alike. This is an exciting chapter in the history of our bank, and we are excited to bring our commitment to excellence and dedication to the businesses and people of Johnson County, Tennessee. We look forward to creating a positive impact in Tennessee while continuing to offer an unmatched customer experience in our existing markets. I believe we remain well positioned for growth and success in the future and know that our employees will continue to deliver on our brand promise of being “Always our Best” for our customers each and every day.”

    Highlights

    • In connection with the acquisition of JCB, effective September 1, 2024, the Company acquired $154.1 million in assets at fair value, including $87.2 million in loans. The Company also assumed $133.8 million of liabilities at fair value, including $125.3 million of total deposits with a core deposit intangible asset recorded of $3.4 million, and goodwill of $4.6 million.
    • Net income was $2.5 million, or $0.45 per share, in the fourth quarter of 2024, compared to $2.2 million, or $0.39 per share, in the fourth quarter of 2023.
    • Net interest margin (“NIM”) was 4.10% for the fourth quarter of 2024, compared to 3.78% in the third quarter of 2024, and 3.69% in the fourth quarter of 2023.
    • Total assets increased $171.8 million, or 16.42%, to $1.22 billion at December 31, 2024 from $1.05 billion at December 31, 2023.
    • Net loans were $976.4 million at December 31, 2024, an increase of $165.5 million, or 20.40%, when compared to $811.0 million at December 31, 2023. Excluding the $87.2 million in loans acquired as part of the JCB merger, gross loans increased by $79.6 million, or 9.73%, for the year 2024.
    • Total deposits were $1.09 billion at December 31, 2024, an increase of $163.5 million, or 17.60%, from $928.7 million at December 31, 2023. Excluding the $125.3 million of total deposits acquired as part of the JCB merger, total deposits increased by $38.2 million, or 4.11%, during the year 2024.
    • During the quarter, the Company incurred $923 thousand in merger-related expenses related to the acquisition of JCB. Excluding these merger-related expenses, net income would have been $3.2 million, or $0.58 per share, for the fourth quarter of 2024.

    Fourth Quarter and Year Ended December 31, 2024 Income Statement Review

    Net interest income after provision for credit losses in the fourth quarter of 2024 was $11.4 million compared to $8.9 million in the fourth quarter of 2023. Total interest income was $15.4 million in the fourth quarter of 2024, representing an increase of $3.7 million, or 31.67%, in comparison to the fourth quarter of 2023. Interest income on loans increased in the quarterly comparison by $3.7 million, primarily due to organic loan growth, and the addition of loan balances from the JCB acquisition which added approximately $87.2 million. Management anticipates this loan growth will continue to have a positive impact on both earning assets and loan yields. Interest expense on deposits increased by $1.2 million in the quarterly comparison as a result of rate increases on deposit offerings, and the additional interest-bearing deposits from the JCB acquisition. Management anticipates interest expense on deposits could increase in the near term as competitive pressures for deposits may result in continued increases in rates on deposit offerings, especially on time deposits. Interest on borrowings decreased by $121 thousand in the quarterly comparison.

    For the year ended December 31, 2024, net interest income after provision for (recovery of) credit losses was $38.4 million compared to $35.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. Interest income increased by $10.2 million, primarily due to an increase of $10.1 million in interest income on loans. Interest expense on deposits increased by $6.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to the same period last year. As previously discussed, this is a reflection of the increased competitive pressures for deposits as well as the additional interest-bearing deposits from the JCB acquisition. Interest on borrowings increased by $266 thousand in the year-over-year comparison, due to short-term borrowings to help fund loan growth.

    Fourth quarter 2024 noninterest income was $2.1 million compared with $1.8 million in the fourth quarter of 2023. Service charges and fees increased by $263 thousand in the quarterly comparison.

    For the year ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, noninterest income was $7.3 million and $7.0 million, respectively. Included in noninterest income for the year 2024 was $221 thousand from life insurance contracts and a net realized security loss of $141 thousand. The net security loss resulted from the recognition of unamortized premiums on a called bond. Included in noninterest income for the year 2023 was income of $129 thousand related to loan hedge fees from a correspondent bank that was recorded in other income, a $197 thousand gain on a sale leaseback, $69 thousand from life insurance contracts and security losses of $16 thousand. Excluding these items noninterest income increased by $614 thousand in the year-over-year comparison, primarily as a result on an increase in service charges and fees of $502 thousand and an increase of $22 thousand in mortgage origination fees.

    Noninterest expense in the fourth quarter of 2024 was $10.3 million compared with $7.9 million in the fourth quarter of 2023, an increase of $2.4 million, or 30.22%. Salary and benefit costs increased by $489 thousand due to the increase in employees resulting from the JCB acquisition, combined with routine personnel additions and salary adjustments, as well as increased benefit costs. Occupancy and equipment expenses increased $134 thousand and data processing increased by $330 thousand in the quarterly comparisons primarily due to branch expansion costs and the costs associated with running two core processing systems before the core conversion for Johnson County Bank occurred. Also included in noninterest expense in the fourth quarter of 2024 was $923 thousand in merger-related expenses related to the acquisition of Johnson County Bank.

    For the year ended December 31, 2024, total noninterest expenses increased by $5.7 million compared to the same period in 2023, primarily due to employee costs and branch costs discussed above. Salary and benefit cost increased by $1.1 million. Occupancy and equipment expenses increased by $604 thousand, and data processing increased by $788 thousand in the year-over-year comparison. Merger-related expenses related to the acquisition of Johnson County Bank were $2.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2024.

    Net income before taxes increased by $364 thousand in the quarterly comparison causing an increase in income tax expense of $16 thousand. In the year-over-year comparison, net income before taxes decreased by $2.7 million, resulting in a decrease in income tax expense of $443 thousand.

    Balance Sheet Review

    Total assets increased in the fourth quarter of 2024 by $11.1 million, or 0.92%, to $1.22 billion at December 31, 2024 from $1.21 billion at September 30, 2024, and increased by $171.8 million, or 16.42%, from $1.05 billion at December 31, 2023. Total loans increased during the fourth quarter by $31.3 million, or 3.29%, to $984.5 million at December 31, 2024 from $953.1 million at September 30, 2024, and increased by $166.8 million, or 20.39%, compared to $817.7 million at December 31, 2023. Core loan growth was $31.4 million during the fourth quarter of 2024, which is an annualized rate of 13.13%.

    Asset quality has remained strong, with a ratio of nonperforming loans to total loans of 0.26% at December 31, 2024 compared to 0.21% at December 31, 2023. The allowance for credit losses remained comparable at approximately 0.82% of total loans as of December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, respectively.

    Investment securities decreased by $5.6 million during the fourth quarter to $118.3 million at December 31, 2024 from $123.9 million at September 30, 2024, and decreased by $9.1 million from $127.4 million at December 31, 2023. The decrease in the fourth quarter of 2024 was the result of $1.5 million in paydowns, and an increase in unrealized losses of $4.1 million because of the changes in interest rates during the quarter.

    Total deposits increased in the fourth quarter of 2024 by $6.3 million, or 0.58%, to $1.09 billion at December 31, 2024 from $1.09 billion at September 30, 2024, and increased $163.5 million, or 17.60%, compared to $928.7 million at December 31, 2023. Noninterest bearing deposits decreased by $2.4 million and interest-bearing deposits increased by $8.7 million during the quarter. Lower cost interest bearing deposits increased by $8.0 million during the quarter, and time deposits increased by $689 thousand. Excluding the $125.3 million of total deposits acquired as part of the JCB merger, total deposits increased by $38.2 million, or 4.11%, during the year 2024.

    Total stockholders’ equity increased by $45 thousand, or 0.05%, to $88.7 million at December 31, 2024, from $88.6 million three months earlier, and increased $5.8 million, or 6.98%, from $82.9 million at December 31, 2023. The change during the quarter was due to earnings of $2.5 million offset by $2.7 million in other comprehensive losses.

    Forward-looking statements

    This release contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Act of 1934 as amended. These include statements as to expectations regarding future financial performance and any other statements regarding future results or expectations. We intend such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and are including this statement for purposes of these safe harbor provisions. Forward-looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and describe future plans, strategies, and expectations of the Company, are generally identified by the use of words such as “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” or “project” or similar expressions. Our ability to predict results, or the actual effect of future plans or strategies, is inherently uncertain. Factors which could have a material adverse effect on the operations and future prospects of the Company and its subsidiaries include, but are not limited to: changes in interest rates; general economic and financial market conditions; the effect of changes in banking, tax and other laws and regulations and interpretations or guidance thereunder; monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, including policies of the U.S. Treasury and the Federal Reserve Board; the quality and composition of the loan and securities portfolios; demand for loan products; deposit flows; competition; demand for financial services in the Company’s market area; the implementation of new technologies; the ability to develop and maintain secure and reliable electronic systems; accounting principles, policies, and guidelines; disruptions to customer and employee relationships and business operations caused by the Johnson County Bank acquisition; the ability to implement integration plans associated with the acquisition, which integration may be more difficult, time-consuming or costly than expected; the ability to achieve the cost savings and synergies contemplated by the acquisition within the expected timeframe, or at all; and other factors identified in Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” in the Company’s Annual Report on 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023 and the Company’s most recently filed Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. These risks and uncertainties should be considered in evaluating forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. We undertake no obligation to update or clarify these forward‐looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

    (See Attached Financial Statements for quarter ending December 31, 2024)

    Skyline Bankshares, Inc.
    Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
    December 31, 2024; September 30, 2024; December 31, 2023

      December 31,
    		     September 30,
    		     December 31,
    		  
    (dollars in thousands except share amounts) 2024
    		     2024
    		     2023
    		  
      (Unaudited)
    		     (Unaudited)
    		     (Audited)
    		  
    Assets                      
    Cash and due from banks $ 17,889     $ 27,862     $ 16,811  
    Interest-bearing deposits with banks   1,562       6,766       4,808  
    Federal funds sold   –       536       474  
    Investment securities available for sale   118,287       123,906       127,389  
    Restricted equity securities   4,034       4,235       3,338  
    Loans   984,459       953,122       817,704  
    Allowance for credit losses   (8,027 )     (7,787 )     (6,739 )
    Net loans   976,432       945,335       810,965  
    Cash value of life insurance   26,743       26,558       22,909  
    Other real estate owned   140       140       –  
    Properties and equipment, net   34,663       33,741       31,183  
    Accrued interest receivable   4,013       3,810       3,463  
    Core deposit intangible   3,815       4,031       917  
    Goodwill   7,900       7,900       3,257  
    Deferred tax assets, net   5,593       5,125       5,046  
    Other assets   16,528       16,555       15,283  
    Total assets $ 1,217,599     $ 1,206,500     $ 1,045,843  
               
    Liabilities          
    Deposits          
    Noninterest-bearing $ 337,918     $ 340,340     $ 305,115  
    Interest-bearing   754,285       745,567       623,627  
    Total deposits   1,092,203       1,085,907       928,742  
               
    Borrowings   29,254       25,000       27,500  
    Accrued interest payable   950       979       531  
    Other liabilities   6,524       5,991       6,188  
    Total liabilities   1,128,931       1,117,877       962,961  
               
    Stockholders’ Equity          
    Common stock and surplus   33,507       33,283       33,356  
    Retained earnings   73,714       71,212       68,866  
    Accumulated other comprehensive loss   (18,553 )     (15,872 )     (19,340 )
    Total stockholders’ equity   88,668       88,623       82,882  
    Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $ 1,217,599     $ 1,206,500     $ 1,045,843  
    Book value per share $ 15.69     $ 15.72     $ 14.84  
    Tangible book value per share(1) $ 13.62     $ 13.60     $ 14.09  
               
               
    Asset Quality Indicators          
    Nonperforming assets to total assets   0.22 %     0.15 %     0.17 %
    Nonperforming loans to total loans   0.26 %     0.18 %     0.21 %
    Allowance for credit losses to total loans   0.82 %     0.82 %     0.82 %
    Allowance for credit losses to nonperforming loans   313.19 %     453.00 %     389.31 %
    (1) Tangible book value is a Non-GAAP financial measure defined as stockholders’ equity less goodwill and other intangible assets, divided by shares outstanding, that the Company believes is a meaningful measure of capital adequacy because it provides a meaningful base for period-to-period and company-to-company comparisons, which the Company believes will assist investors in assessing the capital of the Company and its ability to absorb potential losses. See “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures” at the end of this release.
       

    Skyline Bankshares, Inc.
    Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations

      Three Months Ended
    		   Year Ended
      December 31,     September 30,     December 31,     December 31,  
    (dollars in thousands except share amounts) 2024     2024     2023     2024     2023  
      (Unaudited)     (Unaudited)     (Unaudited)     (Unaudited)     (Audited)  
    Interest income                            
    Loans and fees on loans $ 14,541     $ 12,759     $ 10,843     $ 49,974     $ 39,877  
    Interest-bearing deposits in banks 92     150     68     390     279  
    Federal funds sold 4     25     3     37     29  
    Interest on securities 692     737     743     2,871     3,024  
    Dividends 109     41     68     264     156  
      15,438     13,712     11,725     53,536     43,365  
    Interest expense                            
    Deposits 3,601     3,407     2,360     12,650     6,617  
    Interest on borrowings 268     374     389     1,416     1,150  
      3,869     3,781     2,749     14,066     7,767  
    Net interest income 11,569     9,931     8,976     39,470     35,598  
                                 
    Provision for (Recovery of) credit losses 214     738     69     1,116     (50 )
    Net interest income after provision for (recovery of) credit losses 11,355     9,193     8,907     38,354     35,648  
                                 
    Noninterest income                            
    Service charges on deposit accounts 624     598     580     2,317     2,186  
    Other service charges and fees 1,146     940     927     3,844     3,473  
    Net realized losses on securities –     –     –     (141 )   (16 )
    Mortgage origination fees 68     108     66     277     255  
    Increase in cash value of life insurance 185     161     138     643     576  
    Life insurance income –     –     –     221     69  
    Other income 42     44     48     124     427  
      2,065     1,851     1,759     7,285     6,970  
    Noninterest expenses                            
    Salaries and employee benefits 4,576     4,525     4,087     17,770     16,704  
    Occupancy and equipment 1,445     1,387     1,311     5,636     5,032  
    Data processing expense 940     744     610     3,019     2,231  
    FDIC Assessments 279     153     143     720     588  
    Advertising 252     256     219     965     768  
    Bank franchise tax 136     132     61     466     376  
    Director fees 148     52     150     326     349  
    Professional fees 276     188     194     856     722  
    Telephone expense 120     117     155     473     556  
    Core deposit intangible amortization 216     107     80     482     369  
    Merger-related expenses 923     1,143     –     2,423     –  
    Other expense 987     821     898     3,145     2,847  
      10,298     9,625     7,908     36,281     30,542  
    Net income before income taxes 3,122     1,419     2,758     9,358     12,076  
                                 
    Income tax expense 619     362     603     1,933     2,376  
    Net income $ 2,503     $ 1,057     $ 2,155     $ 7,425     $ 9,700  
                                 
    Net income per share $ 0.45     $ 0.19     $ 0.39     $ 1.34     $ 1.74  
    Weighted average shares outstanding 5,557,156     5,553,579     5,561,075     5,557,210     5,579,654  
    Dividends declared per share $ 0.00     $ 0.23     $ 0.00     $ 0.46     $ 0.42  
                                 

    Skyline Bankshares, Inc.
    Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures

    In addition to financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), the Company uses certain non-GAAP financial measures that provide useful information for financial and operational decision making, evaluating trends, and understanding the Company’s financial condition, capital position and financial results. Non-GAAP financial measures are supplemental and not a substitute for, or more important than, financial measures prepared in accordance with GAAP and may not be comparable to those reported by other financial institutions. The non-GAAP financial measure presented in this document includes tangible book value per share, and the following items adjusted for merger-related expenses: return on average assets, return on average equity, and net income per share. For periods that are shorter than twelve months, the Company annualizes net income for the return on average assets and the return on average equity. The following tables present calculations underlying non-GAAP financial measures.

               
      December 31,     September 30,     December 31,  
    (dollars in thousands except share amounts) 2024     2024     2023  
      (Unaudited)
    		     (Unaudited)
    		     (Unaudited)
    		  
    Tangible Common Equity          
    Total stockholders’ equity (GAAP) $ 88,668     $ 88,623     $ 82,882  
    Less: Goodwill   (7,900 )     (7,900 )     (3,257 )
    Less: Core deposit intangible           (3,815 )             (4,031 )             (917 )
    Tangible common equity (non-GAAP) $         76,953     $         76,692     $         78,708  
    Common stock shares outstanding           5,651,704               5,639,204               5,584,204  
    Tangible book value per share $         13.62     $         13.60     $         14.09  
               
      Three Months Ended
    		     Year Ended
    		  
      December 31,     September 30,     December 31,     December 31,
    		  
    (dollars in thousands except share amounts) 2024     2024     2023     2024     2023  
      (Unaudited)     (Unaudited)     (Unaudited)     (Unaudited)     (Unaudited)  
    Annualized Net Income                                      
    Net income (GAAP) $ 2,503     $ 1,057     $ 2,155     $ 7,425     $ 9,700  
    Add: Items not annualized                                      
    Merger-related expenses   923       1,143       –       2,423       –  
    Tax effect of merger-related expenses           (184 )             (212 )             –                (407 )             –  
    Total non-annualized items           739               931               –               2,016               –  
    Adjusted net income $         3,242     $         1,988     $         2,155     $         9,441     $         9,700  
                                           
    Adjusted net income, annualized for ratio calculation (non-GAAP) $         12,898     $         7,909     $         8,550     $         9,441     $         9,700  
                                           
    Net income, annualized for ratio calculation $         9,958     $         4,205     $         8,550     $         7,425     $         9,700  
                                           
    Average total assets $         1,213,167     $         1,123,844     $         1,032,307     $         1,109,465     $         1,012,827  
    Average total equity $         88,684     $         87,292     $         77,352     $         85,460     $         76,598  
    Weighted average shares outstanding           5,557,156               5,553,579               5,561,075               5,557,210               5,579,654  
                                           
    Return on average assets (GAAP)   0.82 %     0.37 %     0.83 %     0.67 %     0.96 %
    Adjusted return on average assets (non-GAAP)   1.06 %     0.70 %     0.83 %     0.85 %     0.96 %
                                           
    Return on average equity (GAAP)   11.23 %     4.82 %     11.05 %     8.69 %     12.66 %
    Adjusted return on average equity (non-GAAP)   14.54 %     9.06 %     11.05 %     11.05 %     12.66 %
                                           
    Net income per share $         0.45     $         0.19     $         0.39     $         1.34     $         1.74  
    Adjusted net income per share $         0.58     $         0.36     $         0.39     $         1.70     $         1.74  
                                           

    For more information contact:
    Blake Edwards, President & CEO – 276-773-2811
    Lori Vaught, EVP & CFO – 276-773-2811

    The MIL Network –

  • MIL-OSI Economics: Samsung Kiosks Powered By GRUBBRR Elevate the Fan Experience at the Big Game

    Source: Samsung

    Samsung and GRUBBRR®, the leader in self-ordering technologies, are enhancing the guest experience at the Big Game this Sunday. Fans attending are encouraged to visit Section 115 to utilize the Samsung All-In-One Kiosk powered by GRUBBRR’s self-ordering technology.
    “Samsung has a long history of delivering winning technology to the biggest stages in sports, including the Big Game,” said David Phelps, Head of Display Division, Samsung Electronics America. “With Samsung Kiosks and GRUBBRR self-service software, fans can order their food with ease and speed. No matter who they are rooting for on Sunday, they can enjoy less time in concession lines and more time watching the starting lineup.”
    Samsung Kiosks powered by GRUBBRR redefine stadium dining by allowing fans to browse food and beverage options at their own pace, customize their orders and complete their purchase all on one screen. GRUBBRR’s partnership with Samsung equips venues with cutting-edge technology designed to enhance customer satisfaction and streamline operations.

    Benefits include:
    Reduced wait times: Fans can avoid long lines and spend more time enjoying the game.
    Efficiency and accuracy: Self-checkout kiosks minimize labor costs and human error, ensuring accurate orders every time.
    Health and safety: By reducing direct contact, these kiosks provide a safer option for food transactions during large events.
    Smart upselling: GRUBBRR’s technology boosts average ticket size by 40-50%, optimizing revenue for vendors.
    “Samsung and GRUBBRR are changing the game in self-service ordering,” said Sara Grofcsik, Head of Sales, Display Division, Samsung Electronics America. “Today’s consumers expect convenient, intuitive and customizable ordering–and we’re delivering on all fronts on the biggest night in football. Our technology will enhance the stadium experience, making it all the more seamless and enjoyable.”

    “We are honored to be part of the game-day experience and ensure that fans spend less time in line away from the game, and more time enjoying at their seats,” said Sam Zietz, Chief Executive Officer for GRUBBRR. “The positive feedback from fans has been remarkable as we have been lauded for speed, efficiency and a user-friendly interface.”
    In addition to stadiums, Samsung and GRUBBRR provide technology to support restaurants, movie theaters, retailers and other businesses. To learn more about GRUBBRR, please visit GRUBBRR.com. Discover how Samsung Kiosks set new standards for customer service by visiting www.samsung.com/us/business/displays/interactive/kiosk/.

    MIL OSI Economics –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Video: Kaine Joins Senate Democrats in Holding Senate Floor to Protest Russell Vought’s Nomination to Lead OMB, Citing Chaos Unleashed on Federal Workers

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Virginia Tim Kaine
    WASHINGTON, D.C. – Last night, U.S. Senator Tim Kaine (D-VA) joined his Democratic colleagues in holding the Senate floor to protest Russell Vought’s nomination to lead the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), citing stories he has collected from federal workers about the chaos the Trump Administration has unleashed on the federal workforce. Vought is one of the key authors of Project 2025 and has long been an architect of President Trump’s plans to villainize the federal workforce.

    Broadcast-quality video of Kaine’s speech is available here.
    “My colleagues have spoken on the floor about a particular statement of Mr. Vought’s that I examined him about fairly aggressively during the Budget Committee Hearing. In the course of a speech, he said, ‘I want federal employees to be traumatized. I want to put them in trauma. I want them to come to work—to not want to come to work—because they know that they are increasingly viewed as the villain. Now, who talks like that? I mean, who talks like that? Is there a single manager or leader or organizational chief that we admire who believes that their mission, their happiness, their glee, their purpose is to make their workforce feel traumatized? No we would never celebrate a leader of that kind,” said Kaine.
    “What I want to do in my time on the floor tonight is talk a little bit about these federal employees and what having a traumatized workforce means… What I’ve heard from Virginians is just in the week since the funding pause order went into place—something that was masterminded by Russell Vought—federal employees. Yesterday, I decided after hearing stories from federal employees, to launch a website, a resource where federal employees could share with anonymity guaranteed… I thought what I would do tonight is, I’ve just taken 18 of these stories, from the federal employees that have just once in in the last 24 hours, of the hundreds that have been submitted, and I just want to read some to you, to tell you about who these people are who Mr. Vought wants to be traumatized. Who these people are that Mr. Vought wants to personally make feel as if they are the villains,” Kaine continued.
    Then, Kaine shared various stories he has collected from federal workers about how the Trump Administration’s actions have harmed them and threatened their ability to deliver essential services for the American people, including:
    A federal employee working for the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) who wrote, “After two extremely painful miscarriages, I am now 34 weeks pregnant with my first child. Since my husband works as a lawyer for the EPA, what should have been a joyful time in our lives now feels like a dystopian hellscape and we are very afraid for our future and financial security. We are just hoping to have health insurance at this point for when I give birth but even that feels uncertain. I swore an oath and believe in the work that USAID does. I believe that it makes American stronger, safer, and more prosperous, as Secretary Rubio is calling for, and I will supporting the Agency until they boot me from the system. God help us all.”
    A federal employee working for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services who explained, “I am married and pregnant. I am the breadwinner. A woman. I am a homeowner. I pay taxes. I took an oath and I love my job. The daily fear tactics and targeting of federal employees has uprooted my life. I no longer feel safe going on any kind of family vacation, making any big purchases or doing anything because everyday I wonder will I have a job.”
    A federal employee working for the National Science Foundation (NSF) who said, “The opportunity to give back and support the next generation of U.S. based scientists was a dream fulfilled, and I am terrified that I will be fired as soon as Friday with no protections or severance. The fair compensation and flexible schedule let’s my spouse work as a teacher, and she is so great at her job. But that will not pay the mortgage.”
    A federal employee working for USAID who warned, “The attack on USAID lacks intelligence and foresight. China and Russia are filling the vacuum, outspending the US and deepening partnerships with our allies, who feel abandoned. This is creating permanent damage, and undoing decades of progress in a few days. This does the opposite of making America stronger, safer, and more prosperous.”
    A federal employee working for the U.S. Department of Agriculture who explained, “These last few weeks have been hell for us federal workers. I come to work with a pit in my stomach. I am a probationary employee, so will probably be the first to go during a RIF. They have left us in the dark while constantly terrorizing us with threatening, passive aggressive messages, and half legal deals to resign. I fear for my job, but I fear more for my country.”
    A federal employee working for the U.S. Department of Transportation who wrote, “I am frightened about my position. I’m a single income household and am convinced no one has my back. Congress has been pretty much silent, and the news has gained very little traction nationwide.”
    A federal employee working for the U.S. Department of Defense who said, “As soon as this administration took office it felt like federal workers were under siege. They began with their flurry of executive orders and memos, they put Elon Musk (whom no one elected, whom is not a federal employee but yet has huge contracts for other areas with the government) in charge of “handling” the potential mass layoffs of federal workers.”
    A federal employee working at the General Services Administration who explained, “…the disregard for union contracts is deeply concerning and undermines the commitments made to the workforce. Many of my talented and hardworking colleagues have been living in fear for weeks, facing uncertainty they do not deserve. This unlawful mistreatment not only undermines their dedication but also creates an environment of instability and anxiety that no employee should have to endure.”
    A federal employee working at the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) who wrote, “My husband and I are both federal employees and we are both on probation. We also have student loan debts and under the public service loan forgiveness program. If we lose our jobs because we are on probation, we will lose the ability to have our payments to [Public Service Loan Forgiveness] counted, we will not be able to pay for childcare and we will lose our apartment.”
    A federal employee working at DHS who warned, “truly believe a strong, healthy workforce of civilian servants is vital for a strong, healthy America. Our government has a duty to protect its citizens. This – to me – includes making sure peoples basic needs are met, be it healthcare, food, housing, education, etc. The private sector is not taking on this obligation.”
    A federal employee who said, “I’ve served under different administrations, Republican and Democrat, and been proud to do so… The last 2 weeks have been a nightmare.”
    A federal employee who wrote, “Since inauguration, times have been hell for us because every day is loaded with uncertainty regarding the future state of our contract, work, and our federal counterparts we work daily with. To this day, every work day is filled with dread and anxiety.”
    A federal contractor working for USAID who explained, “In the past week, I have experienced near everyone in my company get placed on furlough. Beyond the fact that we were all working to make international development more impactful, and the fact that the US Company we have invested so much time in may never come back from this, we are all without salary and uncertain for the future.”
    A federal employee working for a small independent agency who wrote, “I am a probationary employee, meaning my name is on a short list to fire. I was hired under Schedule A — persons with disabilities, so my name is on a list. I feel like I am being threatened by the very institutions that were created to safeguard the principles of truth, compassion, respect…”
    A federal employee who wrote, “Today, I woke up to an email saying we had a restraining order, tied to Trump’s EOs, that would limit how we’d disburse our grants. Since the EOs were vaguely defined to begin with, this could be a witch hunt for all kinds of programs and grants we give out.”
    A federal employee who said, “I’m a senior human resource professional in the Department of the Interior. I’m on daily calls with Departmental HR leaders who receive direction from OPM. Today leadership mentioned that their coordination was with DOGE “employees” rather than with actual OPM employees. These DOGE employees have full access to our USA Staffing hiring system, which includes personally identifiable information for ALL applicants to any position in DOI. It is unclear what kind of clearance these individuals have, if any, and what authority they have to even access this system.”

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Kaine, Budd Introduce Bill to Incentivize Landowners to Participate in Military Land Use Program

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Virginia Tim Kaine
    WASHINGTON, D.C. — U.S. Senators Tim Kaine (D-VA) and Ted Budd (R-NC) have introduced the bipartisan, bicameral Incentivizing REPI Sales Act of 2025, legislation which promotes military readiness by encouraging the land around military installations to be preserved for the military to train, test, and operate.
    The House companion is led by Reps. Greg Murphy (R-NC) and Jimmy Panetta (D-CA).
    “Our Armed Forces need resilient, modern bases so they can undergo the most realistic and high-quality training. I am a longtime supporter of the DOD’s Readiness and Environmental Protection Integration Program, which helps meet that goal while simultaneously conserving public lands,” said Kaine. “This legislation will incentivize participation in this program by creating a tax incentive for property owners who sell land or property for the military to use for training, resilience, and other important purposes. I am proud to work with Senator Budd on this legislation, and I will continue to do everything I can as a Senator representing one of the most military-connected states in the country to support our military installations.”
    “As the United States confronts new and dangerous global threats, our military must maintain its readiness and lethality through realistic training at home installations,” said Budd. “I’m proud to partner with Senator Kaine to encourage additional REPI participation in order to strengthen military readiness.”
    “The Department of Defense’s (DOD) Readiness and Environment Protection Integration (REPI) is essential to our national security and invaluable ecosystems. Avoiding land use conflicts in areas used by our military is imperative to their ability to conduct critical training and maintain readiness,” said Murphy. “The Incentivizing Readiness and Environmental Protection Integration Sales Act supports this successful initiative by incentivizing landowners to participate in this important program when considering the sale of property near military installations.”
    “Rising land costs are making it more difficult for the military and conservation partners to protect the land around bases. Our bipartisan bill would make it easier to preserve those critical buffers by waiving the capital gains tax for landowners who sell to conservation organizations for Readiness and Environmental Protection Integration (REPI) projects,” said Panetta. “By strengthening the REPI Program, we can ensure military installations remain mission-ready while safeguarding the surrounding environment.”
    Background:
    The Department of Defense’s (DOD) Readiness and Environmental Protection Integration (REPI) Program supports cost-sharing agreements between the Military Services, other federal agencies, state and local governments, and private conservation organizations to avoid land use conflicts near military installations, address environmental restrictions that limit military activities, and increase resilience to weather events and other environmental concerns.
    REPI is a key tool used by DOD and its partners to protect the military’s ability to train, test, and operate. Development of lands and loss of habitat near military installations, ranges, and airspace can lead to restrictions or costly and inadequate training and testing alternatives.
    Preserving natural areas is vital for keeping skies dark, which is necessary for night training, protecting habitats off-base for endangered species, and facilitating nature-based approaches to mitigate flooding and severe weather.
    REPI successfully protected 27,000 acres around Fort Liberty, NC in order to provide a flight corridor for Grey Eagle drone training and conduct Robin Sage, the final training exercise of Special Forces qualification. This action also helped recover the local population of red-cockaded woodpeckers.
    The Incentivizing REPI Sales Act excludes the appreciated land value from federal capital gains tax for landowners who sell land or easements near military installations specifically for REPI purposes.

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Kaine Announces HELP Subcommittee Assignments for 119th Congress

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Virginia Tim Kaine
    WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senator Tim Kaine (D-VA) announced his subcommittee assignments as a member of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee. Kaine will serve on the HELP Subcommittee on Education and the American Family and the Subcommittee on Employment and Workplace Safety:
    “I’m looking forward to serving on the HELP Subcommittees on Education, and Employment and Workplace Safety. One of my top priorities is addressing workforce shortages, including by passing my bipartisan JOBS Act, and supporting Virginia businesses and workers. I will also use my role on these subcommittees to do everything I can to stop any attempt to eliminate the Department of Education, and I’m committed to taking steps to support our nation’s educators, schools, higher education institutions, and students. I’m excited to work with my colleagues on these issues.”

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Shaheen Speaks with New Hampshire Chamber of Commerce Leaders About Potential Harms from Delayed Trump Tariffs

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for New Hampshire Jeanne Shaheen
    (Washington, DC) – U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH) spoke with representatives from local Chambers of Commerce across New Hampshire about the harmful impact of the potential Trump tariffs on Mexico and Canada, New Hampshire’s largest trading partner. As of earlier this week, these tariffs have been delayed 30 days, but if they go into effect, prices on everything from gas to cars to groceries could skyrocket, hurting Granite Staters and Granite State businesses. Representatives from the New Hampshire Business and Industry Association, Exeter Area Chamber of Commerce, Hampton Area Chamber of Commerce, Upper Valley Business Alliance, Greater Concord Chamber of Commerce, Greater Monadnock Collaborative, Greater Dover Chamber of Commerce, Mt. Washington Valley Chamber and the Greater Portsmouth Chamber Collaborative joined the virtual conversation.
    “I’ve spoken with business leaders from around the Granite State, and they’ve told me that what they need to grow and create good-paying jobs that boost our economy is stability and certainty about the economic policies they are facing,” said Shaheen. “To be clear, I’m glad that President Trump has delayed these tariffs, but a delay is not enough. We need to focus on lowering costs for working Americans, not starting a needless and dangerous trade war that would increase prices on critical items and create more uncertainty.”
    Shaheen immediately condemned the proposed Trump tariffs after they were announced. On Tuesday night, Shaheen took to the Senate floor to detail the harmful impacts that the delayed Trump tariffs would have on Granite Staters. Last week, Shaheen led the New Hampshire Congressional Delegation in sending a letter to the White House urging him not to impose tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China which are expected to cost the average American $1,200 per year.
    Earlier this year, Shaheen introduced new legislation with U.S. Senators Ron Wyden (D-OR) and Tim Kaine (D-VA) to shield American businesses and consumers from rising prices imposed by tariffs on imported goods into the United States. The Senators’ legislation would keep costs down for imported goods by limiting the authority of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA)—which allows a President to immediately place unlimited tariffs after declaring a national emergency—while preserving IEEPA’s use for sanctions and other tools.
    After the November election, a multitude of business leaders verified that, if the President placed sweeping tariffs as promised, they’d be forced to raise prices on consumers. The CEO of Best Buy said, “the vast majority of that tariff will probably be passed on to the consumer as a price increase.” The CFO of Walmart said, “there will probably be cases where prices will go up for consumers.” The CEO of Columbia Sportswear said, “we’re set to raise prices” and “it’s going to be very, very difficult to keep products affordable.” The CEO of AutoZone said, “if we get tariffs, we will pass those tariff costs back to the consumer.” The President of a Texas-based Lipow Oil Associates said, “The prices at the pump are going to go up.”

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Cassidy Leads Colleagues in Calling for Quick Implementation of the Social Security Fairness Act

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Louisiana Bill Cassidy
    WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Bill Cassidy, M.D. (R-LA) led 27 colleagues in calling for the immediate implementation of the Social Security Fairness Act to provide full Social Security benefits for millions of public servants impacted by Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP) and the Government Pension Offset (GPO). The Social Security Fairness Act, which fully repeals the two unfair Social Security provisions WEP and GPO, was signed into law on January 5, 2024 after Cassidy successfully secured a vote on the Senate floor.  
    “The Social Security Fairness Act restores full Social Security benefits for the millions of teachers, police officers, firefighters, and other public servants who are unfairly penalized by the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP) and the Government Pension Offset (GPO),” wrote the senators. 
    “The Social Security Administration’s website currently states, ‘SSA expects that it could take more than one year to adjust benefits and pay all retroactive benefits’ owed under the Social Security Fairness Act. We call for the immediate implementation of this legislation to provide prompt relief to the millions of Americans impacted by WEP and GPO,” continued the senators. 
    Cassidy was joined by U.S. Senators Dan Sullivan (R-AK), Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), Jerry Moran (R-KS), Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV), Deb Fischer (R-NE), Susan Collins (R-ME), Pete Ricketts (R-NE), John Fetterman (D-PA), Ben Ray Lujan (D-NM), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), Alex Padilla (D-CA), John Hickenlooper (D-CO), Angus King (I-ME), Jon Ossoff (D-GA), Jack Reed (D-RI), Dick Durbin (D-IL), Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Jacky Rosen (D-NV), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), Tim Kaine (D-VA), Cory Booker (D-NJ), Mark Warner (D-VA), Peter Welch (D-VT), Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), Tammy Baldwin (D-WI), and Martin Heinrich (D-NM). 
    Read the full letter here or below:
    Dear Acting Commissioner King,
    We write to you concerning the implementation of the Social Security Fairness Act (Public Law No: 118-273). This legislation passed Congress on an overwhelmingly bipartisan basis on December 21st, 2024 and was signed into law on January 5th, 2025. The Social Security Fairness Act restores full Social Security benefits for the millions of teachers, police officers, firefighters, and other public servants who are unfairly penalized by the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP) and the Government Pension Offset (GPO).
    The Social Security Administration’s website currently states, “SSA expects that it could take more than one year to adjust benefits and pay all retroactive benefits” owed under the Social Security Fairness Act. We call for the immediate implementation of this legislation to provide prompt relief to the millions of Americans impacted by WEP and GPO. In the interim, we request monthly updates and briefings regarding the status of the Social Security Administration’s progress towards implementing the Social Security Fairness Act. 
    Thank you for your prompt attention to this important matter.  We look forward to your response.
    Background
    Cassidy played a pivotal role in getting the Social Security Fairness Act signed into law on January 5, 2025. Cassidy successfully demanded a vote on the Social Security Fairness Act. In July and again in December, Cassidy spoke on the U.S. Senate floor urging Congress to repeal WEP and GPO as part of his “Big Idea” to save, strengthen, and secure America’s retirement system. In June, Cassidy entered a statement into the record urging the repeal of WEP and GPO ahead of the U.S. Senate Finance Subcommittee field hearing on Social Security. 
    Cassidy is a long-time cosponsor of the Social Security Fairness Act in the Senate, being an original cosponsor since he became a Member of Congress in 2009. He led the introduction of the legislation in the 117th and 116th Congress.
    Cassidy led a bipartisan working group to preserve and protect Social Security. He released the inaugural Bill on the Hill video where he asked Capitol Hill visitors from across the country their thoughts on the looming benefit cuts to Social Security and presented his “Big Idea.”
    Last March, Cassidy grilled U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen on President Biden’s plan to address Social Security, to which Secretary Yellen admitted “the president doesn’t have a plan,” to save Social Security.
    Cassidy has discussed the “Big Idea” at a public forum with AARP on the future of Social Security, outlined his Social Security plan in a fireside chat with the Bipartisan Policy Committee, and authored op-eds in the Washington Examiner in July, the Wall Street Journal in March, and State Affairs and Washington Post in May. 

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI Video: CBP Flies Air Security Over Caesars Superdome for Super Bowl LIX | CBP

    Source: United States of America – Federal Government Departments (video statements)

    U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Air and Marine Operations (AMO) protects Americans during the Super Bowl by conducting aerial security.

    Instagram ➤ https://instagram.com/CBPgov
    Facebook ➤ https://facebook.com/CBPgov
    Twitter ➤ https://twitter.com/CBP
    Official Website ➤ https://www.cbp.gov

    #cbp
    #security
    #superbowl
    #superbowllix
    #lawenforcement

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yRMrCwEFIVc

    MIL OSI Video –

  • MIL-OSI Video: Urban Search and Rescue (US&R) team explains about USAR K9 operation in LA wildfires

    Source: United States of America – Federal Government Departments (video statements)

    Urban Search and Rescue (US&R) team explains about the use of trained K9 search dogs for primary house searches and other essential search tasks in LA wildfires.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W-HqxL1T900

    MIL OSI Video –