NewzIntel.com

Blog

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Highlights – PIF Annual Report 2023: consideration of draft report – Committee on Budgetary Control

    Source: European Parliament

    Protection of the EU’s financial interests © Adobe Stock

    On 27 January 2025, the Members of the Committee on Budgetary Control considered the draft own-initiative report (INI) on the Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – combating fraud – annual report 2023.

    The draft INI report 2023 focuses on major threats to the integrity of the Union’s budget and on the actions to counter them adopted by Commission and Member States, emphasising the urgent need to strengthen and modernise the EU’s Anti-Fraud Architecture (AFA) in light of the challenges emerging in the increasingly complex and rapidly evolving landscape.

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Hearings – Hearing on Harmonising certain aspects of insolvency law. – 29-01-2025 – Committee on Legal Affairs

    Source: European Parliament

    Insolvency

    On 29 January 2025, the Committee on Legal Affairs will hold a public hearing on Harmonising certain aspects of insolvency law.

    The proposal for a Directive to harmonise certain aspects of insolvency law is an important piece of legislation for the Committee on Legal Affairs, with far-reaching implications for businesses, creditors, and investors across all Member States, making it essential to foster an informed legislative process.
    The hearing will provide an important platform for stakeholders, including policymakers, industry representatives, practitioners and academia to present their perspectives and insights. Given the complexity of the matter, the public hearing would facilitate a deeper understanding of the directive’s implications, identify key challenges, and highlight areas requiring further refinement.

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Healthcare information on online platforms – E-000328/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-000328/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová (Renew)

    Reports from the US demonstrates that Meta platforms, such as Instagram and Facebook, have been deleting, blocking or removing posts about the availability of medical abortion and suspending healthcare providers’ accounts, only to later reinstate them (The New York Times, 23 January 2025).

    How does the Commission, for example within the scope of the Digital Services Act, ensure that similar practices of algorithmic moderation do not unduly suppress legal content relating to healthcare in the EU? Does the Commission have data or evidence that similar content moderation problems have occurred in the EU?

    Submitted: 24.1.2025

    Last updated: 28 January 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Highlights – BUDG-ECON – Debate with Elena Flores, InvestEU Steering Board Chair – 03.02.25 – Committee on Budgets

    Source: European Parliament

    Ms Flores, Chair of the InvestEU Steering Board, will attend a joint BUDG-ECON meeting for an exchange of views with Members on the performance of InvestEU, in accordance with Article 27 of the InvestEU Regulation.

    InvestEU is an important investment tool for the European Union, which is expected to mobilise EUR 372 billion in investment by 2027. The Steering Board is a key part of the governance of the programme and – amongst other tasks – oversees its implementation.

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Latest news – Delegation Meeting of 23 January 2025, Strasbourg – Delegation to the EU-UK Parliamentary Partnership Assembly

    Source: European Parliament

    A meeting of the EP Delegation to the EU-UK Parliamentary Partnership Assembly (D-UK) took place on 23 January 2025, from 10.30 to 12.00, in Strasbourg.

    Members of the EP Transport Committee were also invited to join the meeting.

    The main item on the Agenda was an exchange of views on the EU-UK transport and logistics, with the participation of the following experts:

    • Ms Eva Cartwright, Senior Manager for Customs Affairs and Digitalisation, European Association for Forwarding, Transport, Logistic and Customs Services (CLECAT)
    • Mr David Marteau, Deputy Public Affairs Director, GETLINK – Eurotunnel
    • Ms Isabelle Ryckbost, Secretary General, European Sea Ports Organisation
    • Mr Morgan Foulkes, Deputy-Director General, European Region of Airports Council International (ACI EUROPE)

    Experts’ presentations were followed by a Q&A sessions.

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Threats posed by the Astravets nuclear power plant – E-000325/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-000325/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Liudas Mažylis (PPE)

    The Astravets NPP in Belarus continues to operate, posing a threat to the environment and remaining a tool of Russian-Belarusian hybrid operations, particularly those targeting Lithuania and its capital Vilnius, which is only a few dozen kilometres away. Two units are in operation, with the second one running since November 2023. No explanations have been offered as to whether the IAEA’s recommendations to improve the safety of the plant have been complied with, which implies that the plant remains unsafe.

    In the light of the foregoing:

    • 1.What specific measures have been taken in recent months to put pressure on the Belarusian authorities and Rosatom to improve the safety of the Astravets NPP or, better still, to shut it down?
    • 2.What measures are being planned for the near future?

    Submitted: 24.1.2025

    Last updated: 28 January 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Latest news – Meeting of the DLAT Delegation on 27 January 2025 – Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly

    Source: European Parliament

    The last meeting of the Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly (DLAT) took place on 27 January 2025.

    It included an Exchange of views on the implementation of the Global Gateway Investment Agenda in the area of digital transition in Latin America and the Digital Alliance with the participation of Felix Fernández-Shaw (DG INTPA), Carla Fernández-Durán (BID) and José Ignacio Torreblanca (ECFR), among others.

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – NRRP funds and university housing – E-000211/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-000211/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Pina Picierno (S&D)

    The Italian NRRP funds earmarked for the creation of university housing – amounting to EUR 1.2 billion – are at risk of being withdrawn due to a lack of adequate applications and the fact that it would be impossible to complete the works by June 2026.

    Furthermore, the decision of the Minister for Universities and Research to eliminate single rooms in university halls of residence financed as mentioned above by the NRRP, not only raises concerns about the possible withdrawal of funds, but could also affect the psychological well-being of students.

    Considering that the change in the characteristics of the projects funded (such as the elimination of single rooms) could be interpreted as a deviation from the commitments made by Italy and that the EU has placed mental health as a priority in its policies, and has called on the Member States to take measures to promote it (such as providing a suitable proportion of single and shared rooms), can the Commission answer the following questions:

    • 1.Does the Commission consider the proposal approved by the Italian Government to completely eliminate single rooms to be appropriate, especially in light of the principles of inclusion and psychological well-being of students?
    • 2.Does the approved change comply with the established guidelines for the use of funds?
    • 3.What measures are foreseen to monitor these changes to projects that are already funded?

    Submitted: 20.1.2025

    Last updated: 28 January 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Tackling the unfair competition posed by Turkish agricultural products – E-000220/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-000220/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Emmanouil Fragkos (ECR)

    Despite the issue having been reported, the rise in imports of agricultural products from Türkiye remains the subject of numerous complaints. European producers are unable to compete with Turkish products while having to meet the requirements in place relating to health, the environment and quality. Products imported from Türkiye are sold at lower prices and are not produced in compliance with the EU’s strict standards, resulting in unfair competition and harm to the health of our consumers. The situation is exacerbated by the limited effectiveness of import controls, allowing products that do not comply with European standards to be sold in the EU.

    In view of the above:

    • 1.Taking into account emerging international data, will the Commission consider increasing tariffs on agricultural products imported from Türkiye in its new term in order to tackle unfair competition for European producers?
    • 2.Taking note of the ineffectiveness of the existing framework, what new measures is the Commission looking at in order to ensure that Turkish products comply with European standards, protecting domestic production and consumers from non-compliant imports?
    • 3.If it has the necessary tools at its disposal, can the Commission say in which European countries it has detected the greatest presence of illegally imported Turkish products and how does it explain this hole in the system?

    Submitted: 20.1.2025

    Last updated: 28 January 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Latest news – Next meetings of the Committee on Agricultural and Rural Development – Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: REPORT on the draft Council directive amending Directive 2006/112/EC as regards VAT rules for the digital age – A10-0001/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION

    on the draft Council directive amending Directive 2006/112/EC as regards VAT rules for the digital age

    (15159/2024 – C10‑0170/2024 – 2022/0407(CNS))

    (Special legislative procedure – renewed consultation)

    The European Parliament,

    – having regard to the Council draft (15159/2024),

    – having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2022)0701),

    – having regard to its position of 22 November 2023[1],

    – having regard to Article 113 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament again (C10‑0170/2024),

    – having regard to Rule 84 and 86 of its Rules of Procedure,

    – having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (A10-0001/2025),

    1. Approves the Council draft;

    2. Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament;

    3. Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to amend its draft substantially;

    4. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.

    EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

    On 8 December 2022, the Commission presented the ‘VAT in the digital age’ package (ViDA), which consists of three proposals:

    • a proposal for a Council directive amending directive 2006/112/EC as regards VAT rules for the digital age;

    • a proposal for a Council regulation amending regulation (EU) No 904/2010 as regards the VAT administrative cooperation arrangements needed for the digital age

    • a proposal for a Council implementing regulation amending implementing regulation (EU) No 282/2011 as regards information requirements for certain VAT schemes.

    The package developed an action plan for fair and simple taxation that emphasized the need to reflect on how technology can be used in the fight against tax fraud and how the current VAT rules in the European Union could be adapted for doing business in the digital age. The three changes to make VAT fit for the digital age are

    i) a new real time digital reporting system based on e-invoicing,

    ii) update VAT rules for the platform economy and

    iii) a single vat registration for businesses selling to consumers across the EU.

    The directive and the regulation were subject to a special legislative procedure. The European Parliament was consulted and delivered its opinion on 22 November 2023.

    On 5 November 2024, the Council agreed on the ViDA package. However, given the substantial differences between the Commission’s proposal (i.e. the Directive) on which the European Parliament was initially consulted and the text of the Council, the Council decided on 7 November 2024 to re-consult the European Parliament.

    The deemed supplier regime was a significant point of contention within the Council, making it particularly challenging to reach a final compromise.

    The Council decided that the deemed supplier rules will be introduced first on a voluntary basis as from July 1, 2028, and then mandatory as from January 1, 2030. Member States will also be authorised to exempt SMEs from the deemed supplier regime without having to report to the VAT committee. In its first opinion, the EP highlighted the need to limit the administrative burden for SMEs.

    The Council also introduced more flexibility for Member States to operate their own invoicing systems as many member states have already invested heavily in their own software. Summary invoices are also reintroduced under certain conditions despite the Commission’s proposal to prohibit them. The Parliament also favoured the reintroduction of summary invoices in order to keep flexibility and simplicity for Member States and businesses.

    On the implementation deadlines, the Parliament opinion suggested longer deadlines than in the Commission proposal. The Council even further extents the deadlines beyond the Parliament’s proposals.

    Therefore, the rapporteur is of the view that a simplified procedure without amendments is the relevant procedure.

     

    ANNEX: ENTITIES OR PERSONS FROM WHOM THE RAPPORTEUR HAS RECEIVED INPUT

    The rapporteur declares under his exclusive responsibility that he did not receive input from any entity or person to be mentioned in this Annex pursuant to Article 8 of Annex I to the Rules of Procedure.

    PROCEDURE – COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE

    Title

    Amending Directive 2006/112/EC as regards VAT rules for the digital age

    References

    15159/2024 – C10-0170/2024 – COM(2022)0701 – C9-0021/2023 – 2022/0407(CNS)

    Date Parliament was consulted

    10.2.2023

     

     

     

    Committee(s) responsible

    ECON

     

     

     

    Rapporteurs

     Date appointed

    Ľudovít Ódor

    19.11.2024

     

     

     

    Simplified procedure – date of decision

    16.1.2025

    Discussed in committee

    16.1.2025

     

     

     

    Date adopted

    16.1.2025

     

     

     

    Date tabled

    17.1.2025

     

     

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Highlights – Vote on discharge and exchange of views with Commissioner McGrath – Committee on Legal Affairs

    Source: European Parliament

    Commissioner Michael McGrath © European Union, 2024 – EP

    On 29 January 2025, the JURI committee will hold a public hearing on Harmonising certain aspects of insolvency law. The Committee will also hold an exchange of views with Michael McGrath, Commissioner for Democracy, Justice, the Rule of Law and Consumer Protection.

    On 30 January 2025, the JURI committee will vote on 2023 discharge: General budget of the EU – Court of Justice of the European Union. Finally, the Committee will hear a presentation of the EPRS study on the ‘Proposal for a directive on adapting non-contractual civil liability rules to artificial intelligence: Complementary impact assessment’. Th Committee will also hold a hearing on the proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on adapting non-contractual civil liability rules to artificial intelligence (AI Liability Directive).

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Netherlands: Royal Schiphol Group enters into a loan agreement with the EIB for infrastructure investments

    Source: European Investment Bank

    Royal Schiphol Group and the European Investment Bank (EIB) have entered into a loan agreement to the value of EUR 175 million. This represents the first installment of a total financing of EUR 400 million. The loan contributes to the financial stability of Schiphol and is an important milestone in the realisation of the major EUR 6 million investment programme.

    CFO Robert Carsouw: ’The largest investment programme in the airport’s history asks for robust finances and healthy cashflows. Additional financial resources are necessary in order to realise the infrastructure investments. We are very pleased with the support of the EIB and look forward to continuing our longstanding relationship. This loan contributes to ensuring our financial foundation.’

    EIB Vice-President Robert de Groot added: ‘Our relationship with Schiphol goes back more than two decades, and we are committed to supporting them in these efficiency improvements, to the benefit of both staff and travelers. The EIB finances projects that matter to people, and align with the strategic priorities of the EU, this is a great example of both.’

    New baggage basement

    This loan will be used primarily for the construction of a new baggage basement. The new baggage basement will provide the necessary capacity to replace and upgrade the existing baggage system, which will improve working conditions for baggage handlers. The preparations for construction started recently.

    Investment portfolio: EUR 6 billion in 5 years

    Schiphol is investing EUR 6 billion over the next 5 years in the improvement of airport facilities including the maintenance and renovation of aviation infrastructure, renovation of passenger and employee facilities and implementation of innovative improvements to working conditions. Read more here.

    Ongoing EIB support

    Apart from previous financing for Schiphol’s infrastructure projects, in 2023, the EIB supported the airport’s electrification of airside equipment, which helped to lower emissions in line with Schiphol’s sustainability targets. With the planned investments related to this new loan, Schiphol will enhance its operational capabilities and contribute to the critical civilian infrastructure. The loan therefore falls under the EIB’s Strategic European Security Initiative (SESI).

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: New Human Rights Toolkit for financial institutions

    Source: European Investment Bank

    Dutch-based electrical data analytics company Samotics has signed a €20 million financing agreement with the European Investment Bank (EIB) to accelerate its research and development activities. The EIB’s investment will enhance the company’s solutions regarding the monitoring of machine health and energy efficiency, while accelerating work on its next-generation integrated solution, planned for launch this year. The funding aligns with Samotics’ mission to make industries more reliable, efficient, and sustainable.

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – DANA in Spain and the risk of medicine and vaccine shortages – E-002481/2024(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The European Medicines Agency (EMA), together with the Member States, continuously monitors and investigates signals of potential supply disruptions escalated to EU level by national competent authorities to prevent their occurrence and mitigate their effects as far as possible.

    The potential impact of the situation in Spain on the supply of medicinal products is closely monitored. Thus far, no critical shortage requiring EU coordination actions has been identified in this context.

    In the context of the flood emergency and upon request from the Spanish authorities, the EU Copernicus satellite mapping system[1] was activated on 29 October 2024, and the EU Civil Protection Mechanism[2], on 8 November 2024.

    As a result, 83 maps were produced, and several Member States offered in-kind assistance, in the form of heavy vehicles and pumps. The Commission deployed two liaison officers to help coordinate the assistance. The EU’s strategic reserve, rescEU,[3] was not mobilised as the requests were fulfilled by the offers of Member States.

    A virtual warehouse for data on vaccine needs and stocks has not been set up yet, apart from the existing IT tool CECIS 2.0, in the area of civil protection.

    As part of the implementation of EMA’s extended mandate[4], the European Shortages Monitoring Platform, launched in November 2024, will be used to report shortages and monitor supply, demand, and stock levels of medicinal products for preparedness activities, and during a public health emergency or major event.

    As part of the pharmaceutical reform[5], the Commission has proposed to further expand the platform to cover structural shortages and security of supply of critical medicines.

    • [1] https://emergency.copernicus.eu/mapping/#zoom=2&lat=13.56036&lon=33.82273&layers=0BT00
    • [2] https://civil-protection-humanitarian-aid.ec.europa.eu/what/civil-protection/eu-civil-protection-mechanism_en
    • [3] https://civil-protection-humanitarian-aid.ec.europa.eu/what/civil-protection/resceu_en
    • [4] http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/123/oj
    • [5] https://health.ec.europa.eu/medicinal-products/pharmaceutical-strategy-europe/reform-eu-pharmaceutical-legislation_en

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Unequal access to medicinal products approved for use across the EU – E-002559/2024(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    1. As explained in the Pharmaceutical Strategy for Europe[1], companies are currently not under a legal obligation in the EU to market a medicine in all Member States. Access disparities, with smaller and less affluent countries especially affected, can be due to various factors. This includes national pricing and reimbursement policies, market size and the organisation of health systems. It can also be due to marketing decisions of individual companies.

    2. The Commission is committed to addressing the issue of access to affordable medicines for all EU citizens while respecting national competences on pricing and reimbursement of medicines, in line with Article 168(7) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. The proposed reform of the general pharmaceutical legislation[2] includes stronger incentives to launch innovative medicines in all Member States; measures for earlier entry of generics and biosimilars and for faster and simpler authorisation procedures. The Commission also supports and encourages cooperation between Member States on pricing, reimbursement and procurement policies in the group of National Competent Authorities on Pricing and Reimbursement and Public Healthcare Payers (NCAPR), based on mutual learning and best-practice exchange, to improve the affordability and cost-effectiveness of medicines and health system’s sustainability.

    • [1] COM(2020) 761 final.
    • [2] Commission proposals, COM(2023) 192 final and COM(2023) 193 final.
    Last updated: 28 January 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Flooding and natural disasters in Rhodes and Lemnos – P-002710/2024(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The whole EU territory is susceptible to climate change impacts[1]. As the first European Climate Risk Assessment underlined, risk ownership is shared across the EU, Member States, sub-national and private sector actors, along with the means and responsibility of acting on them. The Commission will continue to contribute to making Europe more climate resilient[2],[3], among others with a new EU Adaptation Plan.

    Adaptation measures that meet the relevant criteria are eligible for the 30% budget of the EU funds set aside for climate, including the Cohesion fund[4], Next Generation EU[5], the European Regional Development Fund[6], the Common Agriculture Policy[7] and LIFE[8]. Greece is already receiving substantial funding to prevent and manage climate-related flood risks[9].

    The EU Solidarity Fund (EUSF)[10] may cover part of the costs for emergency and recovery operations incurred by public authorities. Private damage is not eligible.

    It can only be activated at the request of a Member State which has a deadline of 12 weeks as from when the first damage occurred, demonstrating that the total direct damage exceeds the thresholds specified in Article 2 Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002.

    Greece requested EUSF assistance for the storm ‘Daniel’ disaster in November 2023. The Commission determined Greece’s application eligible for support and paid out EUR 101 million in 2024.

    Greece has not submitted an EUSF application due to the flooding of Rhodes and Lemnos at the end of November 2024.

    The Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation subprogramme of the LIFE Programme[11] follows a bottom-up approach tailored to local needs and can also offer room for special attention to islands’ needs related to climate change.

    • [1] European Environment Agency, European Climate Risk Assessment, 2024.
    • [2] EU Strategy on Adaptation to Climate Change, COM(2021) 82 final.
    • [3]  COM(2024) 91 final.
    • [4] https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/funding/cohesion-fund/
    • [5] https://next-generation-eu.europa.eu/index_en
    • [6] https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/funding/erdf/
    • [7] https://ec.europa.eu/info/food-farming-fisheries/key-policies/common-agricultural-policy/rural-development_en
    • [8] LIFE, https://cinea.ec.europa.eu/life_en
    • [9] Under Greece’s 2021-2027 Partnership Agreement for Regional Development (ESPA), over EUR 726 million in public funding is allocated to prevent and manage climate-related flood risks.
    • [10] Council Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002 of 11 November 2002 establishing the European Union Solidarity Fund (OJ L 311, 14.11.2002, p. 3) as amended by Regulation (EU) No 661/2014 of the European Parliament and the Council of 15 May 2014 (OJ L 189, 27.6.2014, p. 143) and by Regulation (EU) 2020/461 of the European Parliament and the Council of 30 March 2020 (OJ L 99, 31.3.2020, p. 9): https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:32002R2012
    • [11] Budget of EUR 947 million for the period 2021-2027.
    Last updated: 28 January 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Violations of Greek and European territorial waters by Turkish fishing vessels and illegal overfishing – E-000175/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-000175/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Fredis Beleris (PPE)

    For a number of years, the “sea bream war” has been raging in the Eastern Aegean, with Turkish fishing vessels active in Greek territorial waters without the permission of the Greek state and in breach of Greek and European law (Council Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008 establishing a Community system to prevent, deter and eliminate illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing, and Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009). Mass incursions of Turkish fishing vessels occur very frequently, and aggressive behaviour towards the Greek coastguard has repeatedly been observed. The Turkish coastguard systematically turns a blind eye to these violations.

    Any fishing activity by third-country vessels in waters under the jurisdiction of an EU Member State, without its permission, is illegal. Overfishing in sensitive areas leads to a reduction in fish stocks, directly affecting the marine ecosystem and the economic life of local communities. The infringement of European law and European marine territorial waters by a candidate for accession is a matter for concern.

    In view of this:

    • 1.Does the Commission intend to press Türkiye to align itself with the rules of the Common Fisheries Policy and the Regulation on illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing?
    • 2.Does it intend to step up the inspections to identify illegal catches on the European market and to achieve a level playing field for Greek fishermen?
    • 3.Does it intend to reinforce the authority of the European Fisheries Control Agency and FRONTEX to stop illegal fishing within European borders?

    Submitted: 16.1.2025

    Last updated: 28 January 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Protecting maternity in professional sport and eliminating discrimination on grounds of pregnancy – E-000227/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-000227/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Nikos Pappas (The Left)

    Although maternity is a fundamental right under Article 33 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union[1], many professional female athletes continue to be discriminated against on grounds of pregnancy. Contractual clauses providing for the cancellation of contracts in the event of pregnancy undermine women’s rights and increase insecurity in an already demanding professional field.

    Furthermore, despite the adoption of the work-life balance directive[2], the employment conditions of professional athletes are insufficiently regulated, leaving female athletes exposed to discrimination and at risk of losing their professional status should they choose to become mothers.

    In view of the above, can the Commission say:

    • 1.What measures does it intend to take to protect maternity in professional sport and eliminate discrimination on grounds of pregnancy?
    • 2.How will it address the existence of unfair terms in contracts providing for cancellation on grounds of pregnancy, which is at odds with the principle of equal treatment?
    • 3.Does it intend to establish European standards for the professional rights of female athletes, including access to social protection during pregnancy and maternity?

    Submitted: 20.1.2025

    • [1] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:12016P/TXT
    • [2] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32019L1158
    Last updated: 28 January 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Cybersecurity in Italy and the effectiveness of NRRP investments in cybersecurity – E-002269/2024(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    Strengthening Member States’ cyber resilience capabilities, coordinating national cyber efforts and securing critical infrastructures are top priorities for the Commission, which monitors closely cyber threats and incidents affecting the EU’s critical infrastructure.

    The directive on measures for a high common level of cybersecurity across the Union (NIS 2 Directive)[1] requires from entities in 18 critical sectors, including public administration, to take risk-based cybersecurity risk-management measures and report significant cyber incidents.

    The NIS 2 Directive transposition deadline for the Member States was 17 October 2024. The Commission is now assessing the Italian transposition legislation that was notified on time.

    In addition, Regulation on digital operational resilience for the financial sector (DORA)[2] requires financial entities to develop capabilities to detect, prevent, limit the impact of information and communication technologies-related incidents, to respond and recover from them, and report major incidents. To assess the effectiveness of the entities’ capabilities, DORA introduces testing requirements.

    Investment 1.5 ‘Cybersecurity’[3], worth EUR 623 million, from Italy’s National Recovery and Resilience Plan (NRRP) spans from creating a Cybersecurity Agency to the implementation of actions boosting Italy’s cyber resilience capabilities.

    In the context of Italy’s fifth payment request, five milestones and targets were assessed as satisfactorily fulfilled: (i) creating the National Cybersecurity Agency (ACN), (ii) defining the national cybersecurity architecture, (iii) the start-up of a network of cybersecurity laboratories, (iv) activating a central audit unit within the ACN (v) completing five strengthening interventions.

    • [1] http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2022/2555/oj
    • [2] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2554/oj/eng
    • [3] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52024PC0509

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Provision of assistance to Syria in 2024 under the NDICI-Global Europe programme – E-002442/2024(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission’s programming of 2024 non-humanitarian assistance aligned with the Council conclusions of 16 April 2018[1], emphasising that EU aid must benefit Syrian population without benefits accruing to the Syrian regime.

    The fall of the regime reshaped the situation, making a Syrian-led, inclusive political process in the spirit of the United Nations (UN) Security Council Resolution 2254[2] a priority for an inclusive and peaceful political transition.

    The EU support initiatives pipeline is guided by commitment to inclusiveness, respect of human rights, including women’s rights, protection of religious and ethnic minorities and fostering peaceful transition.

    On 13 December 2024, the Directorate-General for European Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid Operations announced[3] that the Commission mobilised EUR 4 million in additional aid to address the most urgent humanitarian needs of people, bringing total support to EUR 163 million in 2024.

    The special measure for 2024[4] allocates EUR 36 million to critical areas like health, education, civil documentation, housing, property rights, civil society and justice.

    Assistance targets areas with acute needs and significant numbers of returning refugees and internally displaced persons, as well as on the creation of conditions for safe, voluntary and dignified returns of Syrian refugees, as defined by the UN High Commissioner for Refugees.

    The EU collaborates with UN agencies, Member State agencies, Syrian-led and international non-governmental organisations, maintaining regular dialogue with civil society across Syria and in the diaspora.

    As the situation evolves, the EU will adjust its approach, if needed, in response to the actions and policies of the new authorities, with the overarching aim of supporting the Syrian people and ensuring an inclusive transition and sustainable peace and stability.

    • [1] https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-7956-2018-INIT/en/pdf
    • [2] https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/814715/?v=pdf
    • [3] https://civil-protection-humanitarian-aid.ec.europa.eu/news-stories/news/eu-launches-humanitarian-air-bridge-operation-syria-deliver-emergency-supplies-and-boosts-2024-12-13_en
    • [4] https://neighbourhood-enlargement.ec.europa.eu/commission-implementing-decision-29112024-financing-special-measure-favour-syria-2024_en?prefLang=pt

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Digital Services Act – E-002707/2024(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Digital Services Act (DSA)[1] entered into full application on 17 February 2024. The Member States were obliged to designate and empower their national Digital Services Coordinators (DSCs) by that date. It is those DSCs that are tasked with awarding the status of trusted flagger to applicants that meet the conditions of Article 22 DSA.

    It is of utmost importance for the Commission that the implementation of the DSA is completed as soon as possible. Significant resources are dedicated to support this objective, allowing the Commission to issue the necessary secondary legislation[2], issue guidelines where needed[3], and work efficiently with the European Board for Digital Services (the Board)[4].

    Unfortunately, not all Member States designated and empowered their DSCs by 17 February 2024. As of 9 January 2025, the Commission therefore initiated 13 infringement procedures[5] against Member States that failed to do so[6].

    Only once DSCs have been designated and empowered, can they award the trusted flagger status to eligible entities which can benefit from priority treatment of their notices by online platforms.

    While guidelines on trusted flaggers are not a requirement for DSCs to assign that status to eligible entities, the Commission is currently preparing such guidelines. The guidelines will be subject to public consultation in due course, after consulting the Board[7].

    As of 19 December 2024, 15 trusted flaggers were listed on the dedicated website[8] of the Commission, including entities dedicated to the protection of minors.

    • [1] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj
    • [2] See, for example, https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/implementing-regulation-laying-down-templates-concerning-transparency-reporting-obligations or https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/13817-Delegated-Regulation-on-data-access-provided-for-in-the-Digital-Services-Act_en
    • [3] https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_24_1707 or https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/news/commission-launches-call-evidence-guidelines-protection-minors-online-under-digital-services-act
    • [4] https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/dsa-board-working-groups
    • [5] https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/news/commission-calls-cyprus-czechia-estonia-poland-portugal-and-slovakia-designate-and-fully-empower and https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/news/commission-calls-6-member-states-comply-eu-digital-services-act
    • [6] https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/dsa-dscs
    • [7] https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/dsa-board
    • [8] https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/trusted-flaggers-under-dsa
    Last updated: 28 January 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Protecting Brandy de Jerez – E-002805/2024(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    As explained in the reply to Question E-002565/2024, after the entry into force of Regulation (EU) 2019/787[1], the Commission considered the preparation of a delegated act laying down derogations from the youngest component rule along with appropriate control mechanisms for Brandy de Jerez.

    However, certain Member States were against such proposal, considering that making an exception for one single product would weaken the very authority of the general age labelling rule, applied worldwide for many years.

    In view of such disagreement, the Commission has not presented a draft for discussion to the expert group for spirit drinks and will not be in a position to do so until there is a sufficient consensus to adopt such a delegated act.

    As for the deadline for adopting delegated acts expiring in May 2026, the Honourable Member is reminded that Article 46(2) of Regulation (EU) 2019/787 provides for the tacit extension of that delegation of power for periods of an identical duration, unless the European Parliament or the Council opposes such extension not later than three months before the end of each period.

    • [1] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32019R0787
    Last updated: 28 January 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – European aid for Georgia – E-001856/2024(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission stands ready to support the Georgian people on their European path.

    At the same time, in reaction to the developments in Georgia, including targeting civil society and restricting the rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex and queer (LGBTIQ) people, and in line with the European Council’s conclusions[1], the Commission launched a review of its bilateral financial assistance portfolio benefiting Georgia. As a result, over EUR 120 million from the 2022-2024 envelopes were withheld or will be reallocated.

    Ensuring and upholding human rights, including the rights of LGBTIQ people, is at the core of the enlargement process, annually assessed within the Commission’s enlargement report.

    The Commission has repeatedly stressed that the legal initiatives targeting LGBTIQ people undermine the fundamental rights of Georgians, risk further stigmatisation and discrimination of part of the population and are not in line with Georgia’s stated aim to join the EU[2].

    In 2022, the Commission referred Hungary to the Court of Justice of the EU over violation of LGBTIQ rights[3]. It also found that provisions of the so-called child-protection law have a concrete and direct impact on the compliance with the horizontal enabling condition on the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights[4], based on the criteria under Annex III of the Common Provisions Regulation[5].

    Therefore, the reimbursement of payment requests related to certain specific objectives of three Cohesion Policy programmes are partly suspended.

    • [1] https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/qa3lblga/euco-conclusions-27062024-en.pdf
    • [2] https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/georgia-statement-spokesperson-legislative-package-family-values-and-protection-minors_en?s=221
    • [3] https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_22_2689
    • [4] https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/qanda_23_6466
    • [5] Regulation (EU) 2021/1060 of 24 June 2021.
    Last updated: 28 January 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Dangers e-cigarettes pose to consumers – E-002345/2024(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    1. The Commission follows the EU market of tobacco products closely. There are no safe levels of nicotine consumption. In the EU, to advertise and promote nicotine-containing e-cigarettes is prohibited in Information Society Services, in the press, other printed publications, the radio and audiovisual media[1]. Member States may prohibit cross-border distance sales of nicotine-containing electronic cigarettes to consumers[2].

    While Member States are in principle responsible for regulating age limits and sales arrangements for tobacco and related products within the remit of their own jurisdiction, they are encouraged to prevent sales of such products to children and adolescents[3].

    The Tobacco Products Directive allows Member States to prohibit a certain category of tobacco or related products if such prohibition is justified by the need to protect public health and based on grounds relating to the specific situation in the Member State[4].

    2. Consumer protection on online marketplaces is a priority for the enforcement of the Digital Services Act (DSA)[5]. It provides rules aimed at preventing the dissemination of illegal content as defined by the EU and national legislation and managing systemic risks posed by very large online platforms and search engines (VLOPs and VLOSEs). Providers of online marketplaces must comply with the applicable EU law regarding precontractual information, compliance, and product safety[6]. VLOPs and VLOSEs, in addition, need to comply with the provisions concerning risk assessments of the systemic risks posed by their services and measures to mitigate those risks.[7]

    3. The Commission is carrying out a comprehensive evaluation of the EU legislative framework on tobacco[8]. Future steps will depend on its findings.

    • [1] Article 20(5) of the Tobacco Products Directive 2014/40/EU and Article 9(1)(d) Audiovisual Media Services Directive 2010/13/EU: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:02010L0013-20181218
    • [2] Article 20(6) of the Tobacco Products Directive 2014/40/EU.
    • [3] Recital 21 of the Tobacco Products Directive 2014/40/EU.
    • [4] Article 24(3) of the Tobacco Products Directive 2014/40/EU.
    • [5] Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 October 2022 on a Single Market for Digital Services and amending Directive 2000/31/EC (Digital Services Act).
    • [6] In line with Article 31 of the Digital Services Act.
    • [7] In line with Articles 34-35 of the Digital Services Act.
    • [8] https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/13481-Evaluation-of-the-legislative-framework-for-tobacco-control_en
    Last updated: 28 January 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Data supporting the proposal for changing the protection status of wolves – E-002639/2024(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The analysis of the wolf situation published in December 2023 by the Commission[1] considered the best available data including the conservation status assessments reported by Member States under Article 17 of the Habitats Directive[2]; the International Union for Conservation of Nature Red List assessments; as well as updated information on wolf numbers in the EU.

    This analysis showed that the conservation status of the wolf in Europe has significantly recovered over the last decades and that the general trends in population and range were still improving.

    The Commission therefore considered, with that information at hand, that waiting for the next reports to be submitted under Article 17 of the Habitats Directive was not necessary.

    Generally increasing trends of both population and range of wolves in Europe have been confirmed by the latest available data, recently published by the Commission[3].

    A change of the protection status of the wolf in the Habitats Directive[4] would not remove the obligation for Member States to reach or maintain good conservation status of wolf populations.

    It will rather provide additional flexibility to the Member States that need it, without obliging other Member States to change the protection status of the wolf at national level.

    Irrespective of any change in the legal protection status of the wolf, the Commission will continue to promote and support, through EU funding instruments, the design and implementation of appropriate coexistence solutions, including measures to prevent and reduce livestock depredations by protected wildlife species[5].

    • [1] https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/env/items/813295/en
    • [2] Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora, OJ L 206, 22.7.1992, p. 7-50.
    • [3] https://circabc.europa.eu/ui/group/3f466d71-92a7-49eb-9c63-6cb0fadf29dc/library/97829710-878b-4bf7-95a1-f135b00dd8f7/details
    • [4] i.e. moving the species to Annex V of the Habitats Directive.
    • [5] https://environment.ec.europa.eu/topics/nature-and-biodiversity/habitats-directive/large-carnivores/eu-large-carnivore-platform/eu-funding-and-large-carnivores_en
    Last updated: 28 January 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Conformity of Tuscany’s regional waste management plan – E-002592/2024(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    1. According to available information, Tuscany’s regional waste management plan has not yet been formally adopted at regional Council level. After its adoption, the plan shall be placed on a publicly available website. Italy shall inform the Commission of the adoption[1]. When this has taken place, the Commission will assess the plan in relation to the legal requirements of the Waste Framework Directive and the Common Provisions Regulation[2].

    2. The Common Provisions Regulation lays down the conditions for Member States to access the European Regional Development Fund[3], and the Cohesion Fund[4], the so-called ‘enabling conditions’.

    The enabling condition on updated planning for waste management means that one or more waste management plan(s) as referred to in the Waste Framework Directive shall be in place and include a number of specific elements[5].

    As for the Recovery and Resilience Facility[6], the Italian Recovery and Resilience Plan (RRP) includes several measures related to waste management. However, the adoption of the regional waste management plans is not included in the Italian RRP.

    Without prejudice to the Commission’s role as guardian of the Treaties, Member States are required to ensure compliance of measures included in the RRPs with EU and national law, including with the EU environmental acquis.

    In regard to the RRP, the Commission assesses compliance with the requirements of the Council Implementing Decision[7] upon receipt of the relevant payment requests.

    As a rule, following the principle of ‘do not significant harm’ (DNSH), landfills, incinerators, mechanical biological treatment plants, and activities where the long-term disposal of waste may cause harm to the environment are not eligible to be financed under RRPs.

    • [1] Article 31-33 of Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives, OJ L 312, 22.11.2008, p. 3-30, as amended by Directive (EU) 2018/851 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May, OJ L 150, 14.6.2018, p. 109-140.
    • [2] Article 28 of Directive 2008/98/EC on waste, Annex IV, Section 2.6 of the Common Provisions Regulation, Regulation (EU) 2021/1060 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 June 2021 laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund Plus, the Cohesion Fund, the Just Transition Fund and the European Maritime, Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund and financial rules for those and for the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund, the Internal Security Fund and the Instrument for Financial Support for Border Management and Visa Policy.
    • [3] https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/funding/erdf_en
    • [4] https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/funding/cohesion-fund_en; N.B. Italy is not eligible for the Cohesion Fund.
    • [5] Annex IV, Section 2.6 of the Common Provisions Regulation: Regulation (EU) 2021/1060 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 June 2021 laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund Plus, the Cohesion Fund, the Just Transition Fund and the European Maritime, Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund and financial rules for those and for the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund, the Internal Security Fund and the Instrument for Financial Support for Border Management and Visa Policy, OJ L 231, 30.6.2021, p. 159-706.
    • [6] https://commission.europa.eu/business-economy-euro/economic-recovery/recovery-and-resilience-facility_en
    • [7] https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/a0e7539e-8d32-11ee-8aa6-01aa75ed71a1/language-en

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Latest news – 30 January 2025 – Extraordinary meeting – Delegation to the Africa-EU Parliamentary Assembly

    Source: European Parliament

    On Thursday, 30th January, 2025 (14.00-15.00), the DAFR delegation will hold an extraordinary meeting in Brussels (room: SPINELLI 1G2) on on the new developments in the Democratic Republic of Congo.
    Webstreaming will be available.

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Former West Virginia Supervisory Correctional Officer Found Guilty Following Jury Trial on Conspiracy and Obstruction Charges

    Source: US State of California

    Following a four-day jury trial, Chad Lester, a former lieutenant at the Southern Regional Jail in Beaver, West Virginia, was found guilty yesterday of conspiracy, witness tampering, and giving false statements to the FBI. The charges arose out of a staff assault of an inmate named Quantez Burks, who later died from injuries he suffered during the assault. Seven correctional officers pleaded guilty in connection with the assault of Burks; several of those former officers testified against the defendant during the trial. The defendant faced charges related to his efforts to obstruct the investigation into the assault.

    According to the evidence presented at trial, the defendant conspired with other officers at the Southern Regional Jail to tamper with witnesses to cover up the assault of Burks. The evidence showed the defendant directed a subordinate correctional officer to leave truthful information out of his report related to the circumstances of Burks’ death. The defendant directed another officer to include in his report false information about Burks. The defendant told a third officer that he would beat him if he discovered that the officer was providing information about the assault to investigators. Finally, the defendant provided false information relating to the assault of Burks to the FBI during an interview.

    Lester is scheduled for sentencing on April 16 and faces a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison. A federal district court judge will determine any sentence based on the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors.

    The FBI Pittsburgh Field Office, Charleston Resident Agency, investigated the case.

    Deputy Chief Christine M. Siscaretti and Trial Attorney Tenette Smith of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division prosecuted the case in partnership with the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of West Virginia.

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI Security: James C. Thompson Sentenced to 20 Years for Transportation of a Minor in Interstate Commerce with the Intent to Engage in Sexual Activity

    Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) State Crime News

    CHATTANOOGA, Tenn. – On January 24, 2025, James C. Thompson, 72, formerly of Lookout Mountain, Tennessee, was sentenced to 240 months by the Honorable Travis R. McDonough, District Court Judge, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee at Chattanooga, Tennessee.  Thompson was also ordered to pay a $250,000 fine and to serve three years on supervised release.  In addition, Thompson will be required to register with state sex offender registries and comply with special sex offender conditions during his supervised release.

    As part of the plea agreement filed with the court, Thompson agreed to plead guilty to an information charging him with four counts of transportation of a minor in interstate commerce with the intent to engage in sexual activity in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2423(a).

    According to court filed documents, in 2000, Thompson traveled on separate occasions with three different boys and sexually molested them.  Thompson was 48 years old at the time and the young boys were less than 18 years old.  Thompson drove them from the community where they lived, Lookout Mountain, Tennessee, to different out-of-state locations.  When Thompson’s conduct was discovered, an agent with the Federal Bureau of Investigation confronted Thompson and he confessed.

    U.S. Attorney Francis M. Hamilton III, of the Eastern District of Tennessee and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Special Agent in Charge Joseph E. Carrico, made the announcement. 

    The criminal indictment was the result of an investigation by the Jackson County Alabama Sheriff’s Office and the FBI.  This investigation was led by FBI Special Agent Samuel Moore.

    Assistant United States Attorney James T. Brooks and Special Assistant United States Attorney Charlie Minor represented the United States.

    This case was brought as part of Project Safe Childhood (PSC), a nationwide initiative launched in May 2006, by the Department of Justice to combat the growing epidemic of child sexual exploitation and abuse.  Led by the United States Attorney’s Offices and the Criminal Division’s Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, PSC marshals federal, state, and local resources to locate, apprehend, and prosecute individuals who sexually exploit children, and to identify and rescue victims.  For more information about PSC, please visit www.justice.gov/psc.

    For more information about internet safety education, please visit www.justice.gov/psc/resources.html and click on the tab “resources.”

                                                                                                                 ###

    MIL Security OSI –