Blog

  • MIL-OSI Global: The next president will play a key role in shaping US trade policy – here’s what voters need to know

    Source: The Conversation – USA – By Bedassa Tadesse, Professor of Economics, University of Minnesota Duluth

    From the ports of Los Angeles to the cornfields of Iowa, the U.S.’s international trade policy is a force that shapes the lives of every American. With the presidential election looming in November 2024, discussing trade policy isn’t just an academic exercise – it’s a civic responsibility.

    As an economist, I have spent years studying this topic. Trade policy has profound effects on how industries operate, from production locations to competitive dynamics. These changes impact everyday life, from the cost of your morning coffee to the job security in your local community.

    And, because the president has extensive control over trade policy, every presidential election is a referendum on the issue.

    The two most recent administrations – President Donald Trump and Vice President Mike Pence from 2017 to 2021 and President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris from 2021 to today – have had starkly different approaches to trade policy. The contrast shows how a president’s economic philosophy can reshape the nation’s global business strategy.

    Both Trump and Harris are on the ballot in November. Harris is expected to carry on Biden’s trade policies if she wins. This comparison offers insight into how the next U.S. president will govern on trade.

    2017-2021: Trump and Pence on trade

    Trump pursued a protectionist trade agenda during his time in office.

    Protectionism refers to government policies that limit international trade to benefit domestic industries. These measures include tariffs – taxes on imported goods – quotas and regulations that make imports more expensive.

    One of Trump’s first acts in office was withdrawing from the Trans-Pacific Partnership — a colossal 12-nation pact that would have covered 40% of global output. His decision cost America both access to lucrative Asian markets and a powerful counterweight to China’s economic influence.

    Closer to home, Trump renegotiated the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) into the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement,
    tightening rules for automakers. The effect? While wages for workers in the automotive industry and vehicle prices for American consumers increased, it barely spurred any additional domestic car production.

    Trump also launched a tariff-driven trade war with China and the European Union, asserting it would address unfair practices and reduce the U.S. trade deficit. The strategy, however, prompted retaliatory tariffs, resulting in higher consumer prices and job losses in U.S. industries dependent on imported components. While some sectors benefited from the approach, American farmers suffered due to export losses, necessitating government subsidies.

    Trump and his new running mate, JD Vance, have signaled their intent to revive the “America First” trade strategy. Their campaign platform calls for sweeping tariffs, including a blanket 10% tariff on all goods and a more aggressive 60% tariff specifically targeting Chinese products.

    2021-today: Biden and Harris on trade

    In contrast, the Biden-Harris administration adopted a multilateral approach emphasizing cooperation between countries.

    The administration maintained most of Trump’s tariffs on Chinese goods and some on steel and aluminum imports from other countries. However, they reframed the measures as part of a broader push to rein in climate change and protect workers’ rights.

    The administration also launched initiatives like the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework for Prosperity, or IPEF, signaling a return to Obama-era trade strategies prioritizing regional partnerships in the Pacific. The IPEF aims to strengthen economic ties with Asian countries by coordinating policies to enhance supply chain resilience and promote clean energy rather than focusing solely on tariff reductions.

    The Biden-Harris approach emphasizes international cooperation while valuing domestic job creation, particularly in clean energy and manufacturing. However, maintaining many of Trump’s tariffs on Chinese goods, steel and aluminum has kept costs high for some U.S. businesses and consumers.

    Building on the Biden administration’s policies, the Harris campaign has signaled its aim to shield lower- and middle-income households from new tariffs that could raise prices while maintaining a tough stance on China through existing tariffs and trade restrictions.

    Presidential powers and influence on trade

    The president plays a critical role in setting America’s trade policy.

    The president can negotiate international trade deals, although Congress must approve them to become law. The executive branch also controls tariffs; under statutes such as the Trade Act of 1974, the president can impose them without congressional approval.

    In addition, the president can declare national emergencies related to trade, appoint trade representatives, issue executive orders to manage federal trade policies, and impose sanctions that can influence global trade dynamics.

    Free trade agreements can boost exports and promote economic growth, but they may also displace certain workers. In contrast, tariffs on imports protect some domestic industries but raise prices for American consumers. Studies show that tariffs imposed under Trump, and continued by Biden, have led to higher prices, reduced output and lower employment, harming the U.S. economy.

    Trade policies also affect diplomatic relationships and global supply chains. So, as voters sift through the candidates’ trade policy positions, they must look beyond the soundbites. Understanding how each approach affects job markets, consumer prices and global competitiveness will help voters cast an informed ballot that aligns with their vision for the country’s future.

    In the world of trade, every vote counts.

    Bedassa Tadesse does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. The next president will play a key role in shaping US trade policy – here’s what voters need to know – https://theconversation.com/the-next-president-will-play-a-key-role-in-shaping-us-trade-policy-heres-what-voters-need-to-know-241301

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI Security: Defense News: VCNO Visits Students, Navy Leadership in Newport

    Source: United States Navy

    Vice Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Jim Kilby visited Newport, R.I., to meet with students and Navy leadership, Oct. 30.

    While addressing students and staff at Surface Warfare Schools Command, Kilby stressed the achievements and lessons learned the schoolhouse has played since the Navy’s role in the Red Sea.

    “In the last year, this community has witnessed firsthand the importance of what you learn at SWSC,” said Kilby. “It’s proved that you are ready to response in crisis and able to adapt to the longest sustained attacks at sea we’ve seen since World War II.”

    “This may not be the high-end fight, but the speed and scale of response will carry lessons learned for the Navy throughout our Fleet,” he continued. “I could not be more proud and more impressed with the work being done here.”

    SWSC’s mission is to ready sea-bound warriors to serve on surface combatants as officers, enlisted engineers and enlisted navigation professionals in order to fulfill the Navy’s mission to maintain global maritime superiority.

    The school maintains state-of-the-art technology in classrooms and trainers to ensure the surface warfare community remains ready for any fight to defend our nation and freedom of the seas.

    During his time at Naval Station Newport, Kilby spoke with leadership attending the Senior Enlisted Academy and the Naval Leadership and Ethics Center and stressed the leaders’ role in CNO’s Navigation Plan 2024.

    “You are all a critical piece of executing CNO’s NAVPLAN,” said Kilby. “Whether it’s from ensuring our Sailor’s Quality of Service to maintaining our platforms, you are the leaders out there getting it done. I thank you for your sacrifice and ownership entering this new level of responsibility and accountability… congratulations.”

    The SEA is the Navy’s only professional military education institution dedicated to senior enlisted personnel, focusing on management, leadership, national security and physical fitness.

    NLEC provides training for the foundational principles of ethical leadership across the naval profession, guiding the development of leaders who possess a deep, unwavering sense of responsibility, authority, and accountability. 

    Kilby also met with Rear Adm. Darryl Walker, president of the U.S. Naval War College (NWC), at the institution’s Newport campus where the NAVPLAN was announced earlier this year.

    Established in 1884, NWC is the oldest institution of its kind in the world. The college delivers excellence in education, research, and outreach, informing today’s decision makers, educating tomorrow’s leaders, and engaging partners and allies on all matters of naval power in order to preserve the peace, respond in crisis, and win decisively in war.

    Naval Station Newport is home to 50 different commands and is the Navy’s premier site for training and educating officers, officer candidates, senior enlisted personnel and midshipman candidates into future leaders, as well as testing and evaluating advanced undersea warfare and development systems.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Global: Tariffs are back in the spotlight, but skepticism of free trade has deep roots in American history

    Source: The Conversation – USA – By Erik Guzik, Assistant Clinical Professor of Management, University of Montana

    Noted economic nationalist Alexander Hamilton. Douglas Sacha/Getty Images

    One of the more surprising developments in recent American politics has been the backlash against free trade.

    As recently as a decade ago, Democrats and Republicans alike generally favored free trade. But with the 2024 presidential election just days away, both Republican Donald Trump and Democrat Kamala Harris are leaning hard on protectionism. The Trump campaign in particular is promoting tariffs that would be difficult to imagine coming from a Republican presidential candidate just a decade ago.

    This new post-neoliberal moment might seem confounding. But it hearkens back to economic policies – and political parties – from around the time of the nation’s founding, and it offers clues to our divided present.

    Back in the late 18th century, the Founding Father Alexander Hamilton helped put in place a set of policies designed to encourage U.S. industry and to promote economic development and innovation.

    That arrangement, which laid the groundwork for what became known as the “American System,” emerged in part as a counterbalance to British conceptions of free trade. And the American System quickly grew as accepted economic policy as a young America developed its industrial strength.

    Hamilton’s economic nationalism

    In the early years of the republic, the U.S. didn’t have much of a trade policy at all.

    When the U.S. officially achieved independence in 1783 with the signing of the Treaty of Paris, the Articles of Confederation – the nation’s first constitution – greatly limited the federal government’s powers, including its ability to regulate foreign trade.

    These restrictions reflected the reality of 13 very different states that had been more united against the British – and their trade controls – than in support of a common vision of economic development.

    The economic conditions within this loosely connected nation quickly worsened. A deepening economic crisis, rising debt, inflation, cheap British manufactured goods and rising bankruptcy soon emerged. Such changing conditions gave rise to calls for a new national economic policy.

    This economic strain was an important factor leading to the drafting of the U.S. Constitution, ratified in 1789. The Constitution gave the federal government the capacity to regulate trade with foreign countries and, for the first time, to collect taxes. Both were privileges once held exclusively by sovereign American states.

    The ‘second American revolution’

    A strengthened American Congress made passing a national Tariff Act one of its first tasks. When it was ratified in 1789, a national import tax replaced customs previously enacted by the states. Perhaps indicating the magnitude of this change, supporters called it “the Second American Revolution,” passed as it was on July 4, 1789. In effect, it helped create a new conception of the American political and economic system, with a much stronger role for the state in economic matters.

    Duties were levied on 30 commodities, including hemp and textiles. Perhaps foreshadowing trade policy of a future era, the Tariff Act also placed duties of 12.5% on goods imported from China and India.

    The main architect of this new industrial policy was Hamilton, who released his seminal work on economic policy, Report on Manufactures, in 1791. Hamilton’s ideas were based on transforming a predominantly agricultural nation into one defined, at least in part, by growing and diversified industry.

    Though often overlooked, Hamilton’s Report on Manufactures also contained a grander vision – it sought to encourage the development of American invention and ingenuity as a form of economic policy and argued for unlocking “the genius of the people” so that “the wealth of a nation may be promoted.”

    To promote this spirit of national enterprise, Hamilton encouraged promoting technological progress, subsidizing research, attracting migrants, supporting a new financial system and implementing a patent system to promote invention. Such policies were in many ways an extension of previous policy enshrined in Section 8 of the Constitution.

    Tariffs and their discontents

    As the use of tariffs continued in the decades following Hamilton’s plan, policymakers turned increasingly protective in an attempt to more directly promote American industry. They enacted tariffs to insulate growing American industries from foreign competition, primarily from the U.K.

    By the early 19th century, this growing protectionist movement coalesced around the powerful Kentucky legislator Henry Clay and his Whig Party. Clay, who first referred to the American System by name, and his allies were instrumental in raising average national tariff rates to 20% in 1816.

    Those sweetmeats will cost you.
    Library of Congress

    When crisis appeared during the Panic of 1819, a collapse in cotton prices, a tightening of credit, widespread foreclosures and rising unemployment followed. In response, Clay and his allies raised tariff rates again, to 50% in 1828.

    The increasing use of tariffs provoked a fierce response from some in the nation’s agricultural and slave-owning class, who objected to perceived Northern dominance and a strong federal government. One prominent Southern critic at the time referred to the 1828 tariff as the “tariff of abominations.”

    Indeed, opposition to elements of the American System was one of the chief policy goals of early Democratic politicians such as Andrew Jackson, and fights over the system presaged later sectional fights leading up to the Civil War.

    As an industrial revolution took root in American society in the decades that followed, tariffs remained a cornerstone of U.S. economic policy. By the late 1850s, tariffs had become integrated into the policy of the newly formed Republican Party and an important plank of Abraham Lincoln’s economic platform.

    Toward the end of the 19th century, a changing Democratic Party, supported increasingly by a strong agricultural populist movement, continued to largely oppose the tariff system, arguing it benefited powerful industrialists at the expense of the working class while offering little to counter economic crisis.

    The breakup of the American System − and why it matters today

    Between 1861 and 1933, tariffs were a standard tool of U.S. economic policy. During this period, tariffs on dutiable goods often averaged 40% to 50%, especially in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. U.S. policymakers didn’t seriously question tariffs as a form of industrial policy until the deepening of the Great Depression in the 1930s.

    Following World War II, the U.S. decisively shifted away from tariffs. The Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act was widely blamed for deepening the Great Depression and contributing to the international conflicts of the 1930s and 1940s, effectively ending the protectionist era of U.S. industrial history.

    The establishment of the Federal Reserve in 1913 provided policymakers with a novel tool – monetary policy – to deal with economic downturns. The Keynesian revolution provided still another policy response for governments to consider during periods of economic crisis: spending as fiscal stimulus to create jobs and income.

    Finally, as postwar American policy embraced open global trade, American economic policy pursued more direct mechanisms to foster national innovation and entrepreneurship – effectively breaking up policy once dependent on activist trade intervention. With the elimination of tariffs, one of the great periods of American economic growth and innovation followed.

    In 2024, the Republican platform has, in many ways, returned to its origins by offering tariffs as a key economic strategy. Likewise, the Democratic platform, with its skepticism of concentrated corporate power, coupled with a renewed focus on financial support for small businesses and entrepreneurship, echoes its own earlier generation.

    As Americans head to the polls, it’s worth asking how current economic proposals with deep roots in the American System of old might help shape economic policy in the future.

    Erik Guzik does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Tariffs are back in the spotlight, but skepticism of free trade has deep roots in American history – https://theconversation.com/tariffs-are-back-in-the-spotlight-but-skepticism-of-free-trade-has-deep-roots-in-american-history-241311

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI Security: Defense News: SECNAV Announces Service Life Extensions for 12 Destroyers to “Keep More Ready Players on the Field”

    Source: United States Navy

    WASHINGTON – Secretary of the Navy Carlos Del Toro announced on October 31 that the Department of the Navy plans to operate 12 Arleigh Burke class (DDG 51) Flight I Destroyers beyond their 35-year expected service life.

    The decision, based upon a hull-by-hull evaluation of ship material condition, combat capability, technical feasibility and lifecycle maintenance requirements, will result in an additional 48 ship-years of cumulative ship service life in the 2028 to 2035 timeframe.  The Navy has proposed DDG service life extension funding in the FY26 budget request, and will update the shipbuilding plan accordingly. 

    “Extending these highly-capable, well-maintained destroyers will further bolster our numbers as new construction warships join the Fleet,” said Secretary Del Toro.  “It also speaks to their enduring role in projecting power globally, and most recently in the Red Sea, their proven ability to defend themselves, as well as our allies, partners and friends from missile and drone attacks.”

    At the Secretary’s request, the Navy conducted a thorough evaluation of each DDG-51 Flight I ship (DDG 51-71) over the past ten months, and determined the 12 destroyers could and should remain operational beyond their expected service life. The final determination of each ship’s service life is based on maximizing the service life of each ship before it required another extensive and costly docking availability. 

    The service life extensions meet the intent of Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Lisa Franchetti and the CNO’s NAVPLAN which directs the Navy to “get more ready players on the field.”

    “Today’s budget constrained environment requires the Navy to make prioritized investments to keep more ready players on the field,” said Adm. Franchetti.  “The Navy is actively pulling the right levers to maintain and grow its Battle Force Inventory to support the United States’s global interests in peace and to win decisively in conflict.”

    The Arleigh Burke Class Destroyer is critical to the Navy’s mission and has proven itself most capable in contested environments, like the Red Sea.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Global: New Orleans schools still separate and unequal 70 years after Brown v. Board of Education

    Source: The Conversation – USA – By Connie L. Schaffer, Professor of Teacher Education, University of Nebraska Omaha

    First graders led the desegregation of New Orleans’ public schools in November 1960. Bettmann via Getty

    Sixty-four years ago this November, public schools in New Orleans began to desegregate. School buildings once designated as “white” opened their doors to Black students. The integration process, which deeply divided the city, was led by four first-grade girls.

    Tessie Prevost, Leona Tate and Gail Etienne were the first Black students to attend the McDonogh 19 School. Ruby Bridges was assigned to the previously all-white William Frantz Public School. Newspapers worldwide ran photographs of the girls walking past protesters and entering the schools accompanied by federal marshals.

    When Prevost died in July 2024, she was lauded as a Civil Rights hero. Oprah Winfrey paid tribute to her at the Democratic National Convention.

    Prevost herself did not realize her role in history until high school, when a teacher assigned the class a project on Brown v. Board of Education, the 1954 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that desegregated American schools. As she researched, she discovered her own name and story. She took this discovery to her parents, and they gave her a box of photographs and letters about her place in history, including a note from Eleanor Roosevelt praising her courage.

    To some, Prevost represents the promises of the Civil Rights Movement: integration and equality. As our research on New Orleans Public Schools shows, however, neither of these promises has ever been fully realized.

    New Orleans’schools resegregated in the late 20th century, and the city’s predominantly Black schools still lag behind white schools in many ways.

    ‘All deliberate speed’

    In the landmark 1954 U.S. Supreme Court decision Brown v. Board of Education, the justices ordered U.S. public schools to desegregate “with all deliberate speed” – language that allowed Southern cities and states to drag their heels.

    New Orleans schools did not begin desegregating for six years. Even then, only four first-grade girls out of thousands of Black students were permitted to enroll in white schools.

    The New Orleans district would subsequently desegregate one additional grade per year. As a member of that first desegregated class, Prevost was always in the grade being integrated. As such, all the grades above her remained segregated.

    Indeed, McDonogh 19 remained segregated during the first year of integration because all its white students immediately stopped attending. By December 1960, the school’s only students were the three Black girls. Two white students briefly enrolled in January, but their family succumbed to the pressure of the boycott and soon withdrew their children.

    White New Orleans residents protesting school integration in 1960.
    Bettmann / Contributor via Getty

    When Prevost, Etienne and Tate entered second grade, McDonogh 19 still had very low enrollment. In third grade, in 1962, the girls transferred to T.J. Semmes Elementary School, where enrollment of white students was much higher.

    Within that white student majority, the girls encountered many cruel classmates. White students, encouraged by some teachers and parents, tormented their Black peers. Prevost recalled this as the worst time in her life.

    “The white teachers and students did not want us there,” she said. “Every day there were beatings and cursing. They spat on us and ripped off our clothes.”

    After several years, Prevost’s parents recognized the impact of this heinous racism on their daughter and transferred her into a predominantly Black junior high school. Prevost would again be separated from most of her white peers.

    Equality in name only

    The Brown ruling also promised an equal education regardless of race. In practice, that has yet to happen.

    Most white teachers in New Orleans opposed desegregation, and the district initially allowed teachers to choose where they would teach. In 1972, however, the district reassigned many teachers to work in desegregated schools, and many quit in protest. Other white teachers struggled to connect and engage with their Black students, leading to disaffection among Black students. Their academic achievement declined, and dropout rates began to rise.

    Simultaneously, white flight was working against integration. Between 1960 and 1980, the white population of New Orleans dropped 20%, resegregating many New Orleans schools. By 2004, 50 years after the Brown ruling, McDonogh 19 – which by then had been renamed Louis Armstrong Elementary – was again effectively segregated by race: Nearly 100% of its students were Black.

    Across the district, academic performance declined in predominantly Black schools. By the 1990s, student achievement became increasingly measured by standardized tests known to be biased against students of color and poor students. Black students were also more likely to be taught by teachers with fewer years of experience and less education.

    By 1998, test scores at Louis Armstrong Elementary had fallen well below national, state and district averages. The school was also in a state of deep disrepair. In the summer of 2005, the city closed the school, and a few months later, Hurricane Katrina hit New Orleans.

    The abandoned school building sustained heavy wind damage and flooding. Water reached halfway up the walls of the first floor, leaving toxic mud, peeling chalkboards and mold-encrusted furniture.

    A legacy

    Following Katrina, the State Board of Education stripped New Orleans Public School District of its authority to manage public education.

    The state of Louisiana and charter organizations took over city schools, making New Orleans Public Schools the first all-charter school district in the U.S. Despite the change in governance, New Orleans schools remained segregated by race. Over a decade later, in 2017, roughly 75% of schools had populations of 95% students of color, and test scores showed only incremental improvement.

    Prevost, whose married name was Tessie Williams, lived in New Orleans her whole life, working at Louisiana State University for over two decades.

    She returned to McDonogh 19 in 2022, when the restored building opened as the Tate, Etienne and Prevost Center. The site, once a symbol of resistance to civil rights, is now a community center and museum committed to advancing the unfulfilled promises of the Brown ruling.

    As an adult, when Prevost spoke publicly about desegregation, she recalled the difficulty and disappointment she and others faced. But she tended to emphasize her hope for the future.

    “The ways that we are different are things that we should celebrate,” she said in a Black History Month interview with Louisiana State University. “There is so much power and freedom when we see differences in a positive light.”

    The authors do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. New Orleans schools still separate and unequal 70 years after Brown v. Board of Education – https://theconversation.com/new-orleans-schools-still-separate-and-unequal-70-years-after-brown-v-board-of-education-235642

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI Global: Rust Belt voters aren’t all white, but election coverage of the region often ignores the concerns of people of color there

    Source: The Conversation – USA – By Christabel Devadoss, Assistant Professor in Global Studies and Human Geography, Middle Tennessee State University

    Wisconsin voters lining up to cast their ballots in the 2022 midterm election, Oct. 25, 2022, in Milwaukee. Scott Olson/Getty Images

    Every four years, national media turn their attention to the Rust Belt, a term that describes Midwestern industrial and manufacturing states whose economies were decimated by the decline of those industries in the 1970s. This region contains the coveted states of Ohio, Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania.

    Many rural parts of these states have a majority of white residents. The broader Rust Belt, however, also has long and important Black and Indigenous histories and contains some of the nation’s fastest-growing minority populations – in particular Latino, Arab and Asian communities.

    Yet when reporters descend on the rural Rust Belt to understand voters, the people they talk to are almost exclusively white.

    I am a geographer who studies the experiences of communities of color in the rural Rust Belt. Rural is a relative term, but when it comes to policy research, it usually refers to nonmetropolitan areas. From 2021 to 2023, I interviewed 35 people who live or lived in Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan and Indiana and identified as Black, Indigenous or people of color.

    I found that these Rust Belt residents have pressing concerns of political importance. Some of these issues are shared by white residents – and, as such, are well documented. But Rust Belt residents of color have additional problems that politicians and the media have long overlooked.

    Local impacts

    My interviewees described typical rural Rust Belt struggles.

    They complained of limited internet access, few or no grocery stores, declining roads and other infrastructure-related challenges. Jobs and opportunities for career advancement were scarce in their communities, while death and suicide rates were high.

    These difficulties are faced by white Rust Belt residents as well. But other struggles they mentioned are less often considered part of the rural experience.

    They described feeling socially isolated and discriminated against at work and school. Many had experienced racial or ethnic profiling by potential employers and police and been verbally harassed.

    One man, Miguel, who worked in carpentry, said his colleagues openly used racial slurs against him.

    “I was putting away some boxes, and they said, ‘Oh that’s because you w–backs are good at packing things in trucks,’” he told me.

    All names used here are pseudonyms; research ethics require me to protect the identity of my subjects.

    “A lot gets brushed under the rug,” said Bao, a Vietnamese American woman whose father also works in a hostile environment. “All the management folks are white,” so “if you speak up, you lose your job or are ignored.”

    These comments conveyed an overall sense of not “belonging.”

    As one woman from rural Pennsylvania explained, people regularly ask her, “No, really, where you from?”

    “They want to hear ‘Asian’ or ‘Korean,’” she said. “It’s very uncomfortable for me.”

    These racial tensions worsen during election periods. Some people I interviewed reported having been turned away or threatened at voting stations – harassment they attributed to their religious, cultural and political backgrounds, or the way they looked.

    Many Rust Belt voters of color already lack political power because they live in racially gerrymandered districts. When news coverage of the region ignores their voices, too, it compounds that feeling of not belonging.

    In 2017, The Washington Post visited the small town of Jefferson, Ohio, in Ashtabula County, to interview voters described as “rural Americans who fear they’re being forgotten” after Donald Trump’s election. Their coverage focused almost exclusively on white residents.

    “How did you go to Ashtabula County and not see Black people?” asked Belle, a resident who identified as African American.

    Not always Republican

    In the past three presidential elections, Ashtabula County has followed state trends: It backed Obama in 2008 and 2012, then voted for Trump in 2016 and 2020.

    Trump won Ashtabula with 60% of the vote in 2020. That’s 26,890 votes, which means that 16,497 people still voted for Democrat Joe Biden. In the years since, Ashtabula County residents have also voted with the state in two Democratic-backed initiatives: to protect abortion rights and legalize marijuana.

    In other words, just because a state or district backs a Republican for president doesn’t mean everyone is Republican, or that Republican voters always vote the party line. They can split their votes, and have.

    Even Ohio’s largely Republican delegation in the House of Representatives is misleading about the state’s political makeup. Ohio is a heavily gerrymandered state where voting districts have been drawn to benefit Republican candidates.

    U.S. Senate elections show more diversity in Ohio’s voting base.

    In 2018, Democrat Sen. Sherrod Brown won 53% of all votes in Ohio, including 51% of those cast in Ashtabula County. Four years later, both the state and Ashtabula County picked Republican JD Vance over Democrat Tim Ryan to replace the outgoing Republican Sen. Rob Portman.

    Why it matters

    In September 2024, Vance – now Trump’s vice presidential running mate – claimed that Haitian migrants in Springfield, Ohio, were kidnapping and eating cats and dogs. After Trump echoed that false claim on the debate stage, the city got 30-plus bomb threats and other threats of violence, and had to close multiple schools.

    During the pandemic, Trump’s derogatory branding of COVID-19 as the “Chinese virus” and “Kung Flu” led to increased hate crimes against immigrants and people of color.

    In my interviews, several participants mentioned how local restaurants and stores owned by Asian Americans had been vandalized. One woman, Lanh, who lived outside Springfield, said her favorite restaurant had to close.

    “They started vandalizing the restaurant, writing graffiti and set the restaurant on fire,” she said.

    The owners were from Thailand, but, Lanh said, the vandals “thought they were Chinese. Folks around the local community like my parents didn’t feel safe,” she added. “I didn’t feel safe.”

    Hateful political rhetoric is known to increase hate crimes against immigrants and people of color.

    When the Rust Belt is stereotyped as red and white, such experiences go unheard.

    So do some good news stories.

    The emergence of Black-owned bee farms in northeast Ohio, for instance, is one small example in a host of businesses started by people of color. Together, they are helping to boost the region’s beleaguered economy, much as Haitian immigrants have been fueling Springfield’s growth.

    Rural America is nuanced

    Nationwide, 24% of rural Americans identified as people of color in the 2020 census.

    That figure is probably low because the census tends to undercount nonwhite respondents – a problem that was particularly evident in 2020. Even so, that’s a quarter of rural residents who don’t fit the national stereotype of rural America.

    Rural America is white and Republican. It’s also trans, queer, Black, Hispanic, Indigenous, South Asian, Democratic and much more. Even if some are Republican, they still aren’t the rural Rust Belt Republicans portrayed in the national media.

    Ignoring these nuances reinforces stereotypes that the rural Rust Belt is the exclusive domain of white conservativism. But this region isn’t now, and never has been, simply red and white.

    Christabel Devadoss received funding from the American Council of Learned Societies (ACLS).

    ref. Rust Belt voters aren’t all white, but election coverage of the region often ignores the concerns of people of color there – https://theconversation.com/rust-belt-voters-arent-all-white-but-election-coverage-of-the-region-often-ignores-the-concerns-of-people-of-color-there-224466

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI Global: Independent voters think for themselves and stay out of politics – 3 essential reads

    Source: The Conversation – USA – By Jeff Inglis, Politics + Society Editor, The Conversation US

    Jessie Harris, left, a registered independent voter in South Carolina, casts a ballot in February 2024. Joe Lamberti for The Washington Post via Getty Images

    In the 2024 election, the two major-party campaigns and many news reporters are spending a lot of time talking about independent voters – those who are neither aligned with the Republican Party nor the Democratic Party. Despite the power that political independents are anticipated to have over the election results, there’s a lot that remains unknown about this group.

    The Conversation U.S. has published several articles about what is known, and why it’s hard to know much more. Here are selections from some of those articles:

    1. How many independent voters are there?

    It’s very hard to answer that question, wrote Thom Reilly, a professor of public affairs at Arizona State University. Part of the problem is figuring out how to define who independent voters are. Surveys often ask people if they are Republicans, Democrats or independents, and if they answer that they are independents, the surveys ask how strongly they might lean toward one party or the other. But this muddies the waters of political identity, Reilly wrote:

    It’s possible that some voters identify as independent but really just have weaker political preferences than party die-hards, while still maintaining some loyalty to one party or the other. And some independent voters change their political identification from one cycle to another. That makes it hard to tell who an independent voter is and how many of them exist.”

    Those changing alignments, Reilly wrote, “may require scholars, media outlets and the public to shift their traditional two-party view of American politics.”




    Read more:
    Why is it so hard to know how many independent voters there are?


    2. Independent voters think for themselves

    Independent voters exhibit a key quality that most Americans expect of their fellow citizens: They base their views on their life experiences.

    Unfortunately, as politics scholars Shanna Pearson-Merkowitz at the University of Maryland and Joshua J. Dyck at UMass Lowell explained, this is an attribute almost unique to political independents:

    In contrast, Democrats’ and Republicans’ ideas of what problems deserve government attention and how to solve them are much less likely to be based on their own life experiences, and instead simply mirror the information they have gained from leading political figures on social media, on cable news networks or through other partisan information outlets.”

    For instance, independents living in neighborhoods with high levels of gun violence are far more likely to report being concerned about gun violence than independents who live in safer areas. But, Pearson-Merkowitz and Dyck wrote,

    “for Democrats and Republicans, there is no relationship between where they live and their level of concern about gun violence: Whether they live in a relatively dangerous community or a relatively safe one, their views on gun violence reflect their party’s messages on the issue.”




    Read more:
    Politics is still both local and personal – but only for independents, not for Democrats or Republicans


    3. Independents less likely to engage in any politics

    Research into independents’ political activity finds them tending to stay away from politics, wrote Julio Borquez, a political science scholar at the University of Michigan-Dearborn:

    “Perhaps most importantly, pure independent voters are simply less likely to vote than those who express any degree of partisan attachment. In the 2020 presidential election, reported turnout among pure independents was about 20 percentage points lower than turnout among other voters, including independents who lean toward a party.”

    Research has found members of this group “tend to be genuinely put off by partisan conflict and party labels,” Borquez wrote. Different studies have found, for instance, that they prefer photos of neighborhoods that did not show political yard signs over the same photos of the same neighborhoods with homes displaying political yard signs. And they pay less attention to campaigns and partisan social media than people with partisan affiliations.

    So they are indeed independent – but the question remains whether they will be uninvolved in 2024 or motivated to cast their ballots and make their views known.




    Read more:
    Independent voters are few in number, influential in close elections – and hard for campaigns to reach


    ref. Independent voters think for themselves and stay out of politics – 3 essential reads – https://theconversation.com/independent-voters-think-for-themselves-and-stay-out-of-politics-3-essential-reads-241193

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI Global: Americans own guns to protect themselves from psychological as well as physical threats

    Source: The Conversation – USA – By Nick Buttrick, Assistant Professor of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison

    Many gun owners cite protection as a reason to carry a firearm. RJ Sangosti/MediaNews Group/The Denver Post via Getty Images

    Kamala Harris, Donald Trump, Tim Walz and JD Vance all have something in common. All four of them, along with an estimated 42% of American adults, have lived in a home with at least one gun.

    Gun ownership in the United States is widespread and cuts across all sorts of cultural divides – including race, class and political ideology. Like all mass experiences in American life, owning a gun can mean very different things to different people.

    One thing that American gun owners tend to agree on, no matter their differences, is that guns are for personal protection. In a 2023 Pew survey, 72% of gun owners reported that they owned a firearm at least in part for protection, and 81% of gun owners reported that owning a gun helped them to feel safer. This perspective contrasts to that of gun owners in other developed economies, who generally report that guns are more dangerous than safe and that they own a gun for some other reason.

    I’m a psychologist who studies contemporary society. In the lab, my colleagues and I have been investigating this feeling of safety that American gun owners report. We’re trying to get a more complete sense of just what people are using their firearms to protect against. Our research suggests it goes much deeper than physical threats.

    Social scientists are exploring the motivations and effects of owning a gun.
    Cécile Clocheret/AFP via Getty Images

    Protection goes beyond the physical

    By combining social-scientific research on firearms ownership with a raft of interviews we’ve conducted, we’ve developed a theory that gun owners aren’t just protecting against the specific threat of physical violence. Owners are also using a gun to protect their psychological selves. Owning a gun helps them feel more in control of the world around them and more able to live meaningful, purposeful lives that connect to the people and communities they care for.

    This sort of protection may be especially appealing to those who think that the normal institutions of society – such as the police or the government – are either unable or unwilling to keep them safe. They feel they need to take protection into their own hands.

    This use of a deadly weapon to provide comfort and solace may come at a cost, however, as firearms often bring a heightened sense of vigilance with them. Firearm instructors frequently teach owners to be especially aware of their environment and all the potential dangers and threats within. When gun owners look for danger, they often are more likely to find it.

    Gun owners may end up perceiving the world as a more dangerous place, institutions as more uncaring or incompetent, and their own private actions as all the more important for securing their lives and their livelihoods.

    How gun owners feel during daily life

    What does this cycle of protection and threat look like in everyday life? My colleagues and I recently ran a study to investigate. We’re still undergoing peer review, so our work is not final yet.

    We recruited a group of over 150 firearms owners who told us that they regularly carry their guns, along with over 100 demographically matched Americans who have never owned a gun. Over two weeks, our research team texted the participants at two random times each day, asking them to fill out a survey telling us what they were doing and how they were feeling.

    To get a sense of how guns change the psychological landscape of their owners, we divided our gun-carrying group into two. When we texted one half of the group, before we asked any other questions, we simply asked whether they had their gun accessible and why they’d made that decision. For the other half of our gun-owning participants, and for our non-gun-owning control group, firearms and firearm carrying never came up.

    When subtly reminded of guns in general – regardless of whether their gun was accessible – our participants reported feeling more safe and in control and that their lives were more meaningful. Thanks to our random-assignment procedure, we can be pretty confident that it was thinking about guns, as opposed to any differences in the underlying groups themselves, that caused this particular increase in psychological well-being.

    About half of the times that we texted, the gun owners told us that they had a gun accessible at that moment. When a gun was handy, our participants told us that they were feeling more vigilant and anxious, and that their immediate situation was more chaotic. This result didn’t seem to be driven by owners choosing to have guns available when they were putting themselves into objectively more dangerous situations: We found the same pattern when we looked just at moments when our participants were sitting at home, watching television.

    Raising fear and promising rescue

    Contemporary American gun ownership may have conflicting messages embedded within it. First, a gun is a thing you can use to bolster your fundamental psychological needs to feel safe, to feel in control and to feel like you matter and belong. Second, having a gun focuses your attention on the dangers of the world.

    By both fueling a sense of danger and holding out the promise of rescuing you from the fear, messaging around guns may end up locking some owners into a sort of doom loop.

    A sense of responsibility goes along with gun ownership for the vast majority of Americans who own a firearm.
    Matt McClain/The Washington Post via Getty Images

    My collaborators and I are currently exploring whether stressing other parts of gun ownership may help owners to move beyond this negative spiral. For instance, while owners often talk about “danger,” they also talk frequently about “responsibility.”

    Being a responsible gun owner is central to many owners’ identities. In one study, 97% of owners reported that they were “more responsible than the average gun owner,” and 23% rated themselves as being in the top 1% of responsibility overall. This, of course, is statistically impossible.

    To more fully understand the many ways responsible firearm ownership can look, we are in the process of interviewing gun owners from all around the state of Wisconsin, a notably diverse state when it comes to gun ownership. We’re tapping into as many of the ways of owning a gun as we can, talking with protective owners, hunters, sport shooters, collectors, folks in urban areas, folks in rural areas, men, women, young people, old people, liberals, conservatives, and, of course, trying to capture the complex ways that race shapes ownership.

    Who do gun owners feel they are responsible for? What kinds of actions do they think responsible owners take?

    We hope to learn more about the many different ways that people conceptualize what a gun can do for them. American gun cultures are complex and distinct things. By exploring the worldviews that support firearm ownership, we can better understand what it means to live in the U.S. today.

    Nick Buttrick receives funding from the National Science Foundation and the Wisconsin Department of Justice.

    ref. Americans own guns to protect themselves from psychological as well as physical threats – https://theconversation.com/americans-own-guns-to-protect-themselves-from-psychological-as-well-as-physical-threats-239363

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI Global: In Hawaii, parasites and viruses team up in the battle against fruit flies – an entomologist explains the implication for global pest control

    Source: The Conversation – USA – By Kelsey Coffman, Assistant Professor of Entomology & Plant Pathology, University of Tennessee

    Diachasmimorpha longicaudata, a parasitoid wasp that helps control pests. Sheina Sim, CC BY

    Take a stroll along one of the beaches on Hawaii Island in late summer, and you’ll likely stumble upon almond-shaped fruits lying in the sand. Known as false kamani nuts, or tropical almonds, they fall from tall, shady Terminalia catappa trees that line the many picturesque ocean views on the island.

    But what may not be clear to the casual beachgoer is that there’s a fight for survival occurring within the flesh of these unassuming fruits. Tropical almonds are one of many active battlegrounds in a war between a global agricultural pest, a parasitic wasp and a beneficial virus.

    As an entomologist who studies insect viruses, I want to untangle the complex interactions that insects have evolved with microbes. The findings might help researchers tackle global food security issues.

    A global pest challenge

    At the center of this conflict are invasive fruit flies in the family Tephritidae, many of which have spread across the globe and wreak havoc on hundreds of commercial fruits and vegetables.

    In Hawaii, several species of tephritid fruit fly invaded, starting in the late 1800s. They have caused major economic losses to fruit production across the islands. Scientists and fruit growers have undertaken enormous efforts to control these flies since their initial introductions, but they remain a serious economic problem.

    One reliable method of control has been to release tiny insects called parasitoid wasps into the wild that can hunt down immature fruit flies and target them for annihilation. The term parasitoid describes an organism that spends its development as a parasite and eventually kills its host.

    Parasitoid wasps use an elongated stinger, known as an ovipositor, to drill into fruits where flies are developing and pierce the fly’s body to lay an egg within. Wasp eggs hatch inside the fly host and gradually devour the entire fly from the inside out.

    Human use of parasitoid wasps or other natural enemies to control pest populations is known as biological control, or biocontrol. It was so successful in Hawaii that several species of parasitoid wasp have established wild populations on the islands. They have helped continuously suppress multiple fruit fly pests to this day.

    The release of nonnative insects for biocontrol could have unforeseen negative consequences for local ecosystems. Therefore, federal agencies like the U.S. Department of Agriculture have strict regulations for new and existing biocontrol programs.

    The enemy of my enemy is my friend

    So, how do wasps achieve the impressive feat of reducing fruit fly pest populations? Once laid inside a fly host, the wasp must face the fly’s immune system, which will try to suffocate the egg before it hatches.

    This inhospitable environment has forced wasps to evolve an arsenal of microscopic substances, also known as molecular factors, to combat fly defenses. These include a cocktail of different molecules introduced by the wasp mother at the time of egg-laying.

    The goal of these factors is to manipulate the fruit fly’s physiological processes, like its development from egg to adult and its immune response to invading parasites. By interacting with molecular components, like proteins, that make up insect physiological pathways, parasitoid wasp factors can delay insect host development and suppress host immunity to allow the wasp offspring to feed on fly tissue unharmed.

    This is the origin story of an unlikely partnership that many species of parasitoid wasp have formed with beneficial viruses. Virus particles multiply to massive quantities within the reproductive organs of female wasps during their development. Wasp mothers then use their ovipositor like a hypodermic needle to inject virus particles into host insects during egg-laying.

    The virus particles turn into biological weapons that infect cells of the wasp’s host. This infection disrupts processes like the fly’s immune response. Developing wasps benefit from the virus’s activity and return the favor by passing on the virus to future wasp generations.

    Not all heroes wear capes

    Diachasmimorpha longicaudata is a small, bright orange wasp with a distinctively long ovipositor. The literal translation of longicaudata is “long-tailed” in Latin. But don’t let its charismatic appearance fool you.

    D. longicaudata is ferocious in its ability to feast on several species of fruit fly pests, such as the Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata, and the oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis. Because of D. longicaudata’s ability to attack a wide variety of fruit fly pests, pest management specialists around the world have released the wasps into agricultural ecosystems, where they dependably establish new populations and provide sustained pest control.

    Like many parasitoids, D. longicaudata has formed an alliance with a virus known as Diachasmimorpha longicaudata entomopoxvirus, or DlEPV.

    DlEPV replicates within the venom gland of female wasps, which stores billions of virus particles. Virus particles are so densely packed in there that they often cause the venom gland to appear iridescent blue.

    DlEPV particles are highly lethal when injected into flies in the lab. The virus freezes the fly’s development and replicates with abandon until the fly’s ultimate demise.

    In contrast, the alliance between wasp and virus is so strong that curing D. longicaudata wasps of their resident DlEPV infection causes the wasp offspring to die inside the fly hosts.

    A new potential path forward

    My colleagues and I published a study showing that DlEPV may play a critical role in helping D. longicaudata make a meal out of so many different fruit fly pests. We found a link between D. longicaudata survival and DlEPV lethality within different fruit fly host species.

    When we infected C. capitata and B. dorsalis flies with DlEPV, the virus successfully replicated and killed large swaths of fly hosts. However, DlEPV couldn’t replicate within the melon fly, Zeugodacus cucurbitae, a fly species that D. longicaudata wasps cannot use as hosts.

    These findings shine new light on the effect viruses have on host-parasite rivalries. The presence of these viruses could influence how useful parasitoid wasps are in getting rid of fruit fly pests. In the case of D. longicaudata, its associated virus may be responsible for the decades of reliable aid this wasp has provided to fruit fly biocontrol programs around the world.

    This work has also revealed a new potential tool in the war against fruit fly pests. DlEPV is now known as a lethal enemy for several of the world’s most destructive pest species. If researchers can determine precisely how DlEPV exploits fly hosts at a molecular level, they could one day incorporate the same strategies that this virus uses into new fruit fly pest control methods.

    Kelsey Coffman receives funding from USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA).

    ref. In Hawaii, parasites and viruses team up in the battle against fruit flies – an entomologist explains the implication for global pest control – https://theconversation.com/in-hawaii-parasites-and-viruses-team-up-in-the-battle-against-fruit-flies-an-entomologist-explains-the-implication-for-global-pest-control-234780

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Young scientists from the State University of Management presented the results of their research at the All-Russian forum “Science of the Future – Science of the Young”

    Translation. Region: Russian Federation –

    Source: State University of Management – Official website of the State –

    From October 29 to November 1, the IX All-Russian Youth Scientific Forum “Science of the Future – Science of the Young” is being held at the Samara National Research University named after Academician S.P. Korolev.

    The forum is attended by more than 500 Russian and foreign researchers, winners of the mega-grant program, heads of world scientific schools and laboratories, young scientists, students and postgraduates.

    At the opening ceremony, the participants were addressed with welcoming words by the Head of the Department of the Presidential Administration of Russia for Scientific and Educational Policy Tatyana Gracheva, the Director of the Department of State Policy in the Sphere of Scientific and Technological Development of the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia Anton Shashkin, the Chairperson of the Committee on Education and Science of the Samara Regional Duma Svetlana Ilyina, the President of Samara University, Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences Viktor Soyfer, the Rector of Samara University Vladimir Bogatyrev and the Scientific Director of Samara University, Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences Evgeny Shakhmatov.

    The main topics of the forum’s business program were the search for effective ways to attract young people to solve the problems outlined in the Strategy for Scientific and Technological Development of the Russian Federation, and the formation of an effective system of interaction between science, technology and production. At the plenary sessions, leading scientists and experts spoke about new trends in aircraft manufacturing and space exploration, quantum technologies and artificial intelligence, problems of neurodegeneration and how young researchers can build a successful career in science.

    The State University of Management was represented at the forum by Associate Professor of the Innovation Management Department Denis Serdechny and Director of the Business Incubator Dmitry Rogov.

    Denis Serdechny spoke at the opening of the Information Technology and Mathematics section with a scientific report on software and hardware systems and intelligent platform digital solutions in the field of agro-industrial technologies. In his report, the associate professor of the Department of Innovation Management spoke about the competencies of the State University of Management in building ecosystems and platform solutions for business, as well as about the results of research within the framework of a large scientific project – developed methods for assessing the digital maturity of agricultural enterprises, the concept of a data parser for a digital platform and the concept of an intelligent decision support system for computer vision for agricultural tasks.

    Dmitry Rogov opened the Engineering Sciences section by presenting a report on the application of mass service theory tools to optimize the operation of transport infrastructure facilities. Particular attention was paid to simulation modeling, which is used both at the design stage of new infrastructure facilities, which are complex mass service systems, and to optimize the operation of existing ones. The SMU postgraduate student demonstrated to the meeting participants a transport hub model created in the AnyLogic environment, formed on the basis of several logical layers: a two-dimensional scheme, a process diagram, and 3D visualization, and presented the results of an assessment of the qualitative indicators of the system’s functioning, necessary for further analysis and management decision-making.

    Subscribe to the TG channel “Our GUU” Date of publication: 10/31/2024

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: IMF Staff Conclude Article IV Discussions and Reach Staff-Level Agreement on the Second Review under the Extended Credit Facility

    Source: IMF – News in Russian

    October 31, 2024

    End-of-Mission press releases include statements of IMF staff teams that convey preliminary findings after a visit to a country. The views expressed in this statement are those of the IMF staff and do not necessarily represent the views of the IMF’s Executive Board. Based on the preliminary findings of this mission, staff will prepare a report that, subject to management approval, will be presented to the IMF’s Executive Board for discussion and decision.

    • IMF staff and the Somali authorities have reached a staff level agreement on the second review under the Extended Credit Facility (ECF). Program performance has been strong, demonstrating the authorities’ steadfast commitment to macroeconomic stability and strengthening institutional capacity and frameworks.
    • Real GDP growth has been upgraded to 4 percent for 2024 and 2025 based on strong exports and remittances. However, risks remain elevated, including from regional and domestic security developments, commodity prices and climate shocks.
    • Sustained reform efforts are needed to set the conditions for greater resilience, poverty reduction, and inclusive growth. This includes strengthening tax capacity and public financial management, promoting financial deepening, and improving governance.

    Washington, DC: A staff team from the International Monetary Fund (IMF), led by Ms. Laura Jaramillo, conducted discussions with the Somali authorities in Istanbul and in Washington DC on the 2024 Article IV consultation and reached a staff-level agreement on the second review of the Extended Credit Facility (ECF) arrangement that was approved by the IMF’s Executive Board in December 2023 (Press Release No. 23/463). This agreement is subject to approval of the IMF’s Executive Board.  

    At the conclusion of the discussions, Ms. Jaramillo issued the following statement:

    “Somalia’s real GDP growth outlook has improved, though challenges and risks remain significant. Positive trends in agriculture, exports, and remittances in 2024 are expected to continue in 2025. As a result, real GDP growth has been upgraded to 4 percent in 2024 and 2025, up by an average ¼ percentage point compared to previous forecasts. Inflation is expected to continue on a downward trend to 4.5 percent by end 2024, although the pace is slower than anticipated earlier. Despite security challenges, the Somali government remains steadfast in its fight against terrorism and continues to work with international partners to ensure a successful transition from the current African Union Transition Mission to a new force by January 2025. Near-term risks to the outlook include climate shocks, domestic and regional security developments, lower global growth, and higher commodity prices.

    “The authorities continue to focus on raising domestic revenue, aiming to fully cover operational expenditure with domestic revenues by 2027, while also accommodating higher education and health spending. Fiscal outturns in 2024 have been in line with expectations, and an overall deficit of 0.2 percent of GDP is expected for the year. The 2025 draft budget envisages domestic revenues of 3.3 percent of GDP and an overall fiscal deficit of 0.2 percent of GDP, assuming continued access to grant financing, which remains critical for Somalia.

    “The authorities recognize the importance of making steady progress on fiscal reforms. Key revenue measures—guided by the recently published Medium-term Revenue Roadmap—include the ongoing customs modernization, a new income tax law, and stronger enforcement of sales and income taxes. Public financial management continues to be strengthened, with important progress made on payroll integrity. Reforms to improve the debt management framework and capacity are also progressing well. Measures are also being taken to finalize the extractive industries legal framework, including to enhance transparency and accountability.

    “The Central Bank of Somalia (CBS) is advancing institutional governance and financial sector reforms. Focus is on promoting financial deepening, including by enhancing the legislative and oversight frameworks, improving the quality of regulatory data, and augmenting CBS technical capacity. Efforts continue to strengthen the framework for anti-money laundering and the combating the financing of terrorism to comply with international standards.

    “The authorities intend to reintroduce the Somalia Shilling (SOS) and adopt a currency board arrangement. The new SOS notes will provide an important liquidity function by facilitating payments for small value transactions and will promote financial inclusion for the most vulnerable. To provide a stable and predictable policy environment to ensure confidence in SOS across Somalia, the authorities are also starting preparations for introducing a currency board arrangement, with IMF capacity development support. Implementation of these reforms would take an estimated 18-24 months after prerequisites are in place, including necessary external financing.

    “The authorities are also committed to advancing steps to bolster inclusive growth and poverty reduction, improve resilience to climate shocks, and enhance trade integration. Raising human capital by increasing the educational attainment of Somali children and closing gender gaps in education can bring significant growth dividends. Building resilience against climate shocks and strengthening food security is also a priority. Given Somalia’s very limited resources, financing and technical assistance support from international partners remains crucial. The East African Community presents important opportunities, challenges, and risks for Somalia and the integration process needs to be managed carefully.  

    “The mission would like to express gratitude to Somali authorities for constructive and fruitful discussions. Meetings were held with the Minister of Finance, Minister of Petroleum, the CBS Governor, other government officials, development partners, and representatives from the private sector.”

    IMF Communications Department
    MEDIA RELATIONS

    PRESS OFFICER: Mayada Ghazala

    Phone: +1 202 623-7100Email: MEDIA@IMF.org

    @IMFSpokesperson

    https://www.imf.org/en/News/Articles/2024/10/31/pr-24401-somalia-imf-staff-conclude-aiv-discussions-and-reach-sla-on-the-2nd-rev-under-the-ecf

    MIL OSI

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Gov. Kemp: SOLARCYCLE Accelerates Plans for Polk County Operation

    Source: US State of Georgia

     Atlanta, GA – Governor Brian P. Kemp today announced that SOLARCYCLE, an advanced technology-based solar recycling company, will accelerate its expansion into Polk County to meet increasing demand for solar panel recycling services. The company is investing an additional $62 million to increase its panel recycling capacity to 10 million solar panels per year and create 640 new full-time jobs.

    “As Georgia continues to lead the nation in attracting jobs from emerging industries, we’re thankful SOLARCYCLE is moving up creation of these opportunities in northwest Georgia, benefitting that entire region’s economy,” said Governor Brian Kemp. “I want to thank our local and state partners who made this accelerated growth in Polk County possible, and I look forward to its impact in the years to come.”

    The facility is located directly across the street from the company’s previously announced 1.1-million-square-foot solar glass factory that will employ an additional 617 people. The factory will use recycled materials from retired solar panels from the recycling facility to make five to six gigawatts worth of solar glass every year. The factory positions the company as one of the first manufacturers of specialized glass for crystalline-silicon (c-Si) photovoltaics in the U.S.

    “We are pleased to accelerate our work in Cedartown in partnership with Governor Kemp and Polk County. In response to continued demand for solar recycling and domestic manufacturing, we will be able to scale operations and begin hiring sooner than originally planned,” said Suvi Sharma, CEO and Co-Founder at SOLARCYCLE. “We applaud Governor Kemp for his leadership supporting clean energy policy that has made it possible to scale solar manufacturing in the state, and bring good jobs and meaningful investment to local communities as a result. This is exactly what the future of American manufacturing looks like and SOLARCYCLE is proud to be at the helm.”

    SOLARCYCLE has acquired an existing building at 270 North Park Boulevard in Cedartown, adjacent to the new facility under construction at Cedartown North Business Park, a Georgia Ready for Accelerated Development (GRAD) certified site. The existing 255,000-square-foot building will be renovated to house the company’s solar panel recycling operations.

    The facility is move-in-ready and will be operational in the second half of 2025. SOLARCYCLE is hiring full-time jobs in manufacturing, engineering, management, research and design, and support staff. Open roles are available at www.solarcycle.us/careers.

    “The decision by SOLARCYCLE to expedite their manufacturing process by refurbishing a currently vacant facility and creating additional employment opportunities is a true testament to their commitment as a long-term corporate sponsor in Cedartown-Polk County,” said Chris Thomas, President and CEO of Development Authority of Polk County. “This expansion not only underscores the confidence that businesses have in our community as a place to invest but also promises significant economic benefits.  We are excited about the opportunities this expansion brings and remain dedicated to supporting SOLARCYCLE’s continued growth and success.”

    Senior Regional Project Manager Lori Dowdy represented the Georgia Department of Economic Development’s (GDEcD) Global Commerce team on this competitive project in partnership with the Development Authority of Polk County, Georgia Power, and Georgia Quick Start.

    “SOLARCYCLE’s technology is important because it takes materials that would otherwise end up in a landfill and puts them back in the supply chain, effectively reducing our reliance on importing new materials,” said GDEcD Commissioner Pat Wilson. “Northwest Georgia has been a center of manufacturing in Georgia for decades – from providing the flooring we use in our homes and offices to now producing technology for clean energy to power those same buildings. We are excited that our partners and SOLARCYCLE were able to work together to bring the company’s recycling operations online earlier.”

    Georgia is a Top Ten state for installed solar, ranking seventh by cumulative solar capacity, according to the Solar Energy Industries Association. Georgia’s energy solutions providers are helping to accelerate the development of renewable energy products by lowering risks, reducing costs, providing access to innovative industry research, and investing in a superior infrastructure network.

    About SOLARCYCLE

    SOLARCYCLE is a technology-driven platform designed to maximize solar sustainability by offering solar asset owners a low-cost, eco-friendly, comprehensive process for recycling retiring solar panels and technologies and repurposing them for new uses. The company’s proprietary technology allows it to extract 95% of the value from solar panels, such as silver, silicon, copper, and aluminum, and to recycle or repurpose panels for new uses. Experts in solar technology, recycling, and sustainability founded SOLARCYCLE in 2022 to accelerate the circular economy for solar and renewables. www.SOLARCYCLE.us.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Economics: Urgent action needed to safeguard integrity of COP as fossil fuel influence looms large in Baku, report warns

    Source: Transparency International

    ‘Unacceptable’ lack of guardrails leaves climate talks vulnerable to undue corporate influence and fossil fuel industry capture.

    The upcoming Conference of the Parties (COP) 29 climate summit in Baku, Azerbaijan, is at high risk of being co-opted to promote a pro-fossil fuel industry agenda, according to a new report by Transparency International (TI) and the Anti-Corruption Data Collective (ACDC).

    The report, published today, warns that a lack of robust integrity and anti-corruption measures in the UNFCCC arrangements for COP has opened the door for Azerbaijan’s government to use the summit as diplomatic cover to advance its domestic oil and gas interests and secure new fossil fuel deals. The report finds that not only is the COP 29 President a former executive of SOCAR, Azerbaijan’s state oil company, SOCAR appears to be closely involved in the COP, with its president and members of its supervisory board helping organise the conference. The head of SOCAR has already been seen mixing COP and company business while signing new cooperation agreements with international partners.

    The report also finds that the conference may provide potentially lucrative business opportunities to companies with links to the country’s first family. Ahead of the summit, evidence of potentially corrupt activity has continued to emerge, according to the report, including revelations by investigative journalists that a multi-million dollar no-bid contract for COP 29 guest accommodation was awarded to a business owned by the former son-in-law of Ilham Aliyev, the President of Azerbaijan. Several COP 29 corporate sponsors, or “Green Zone Partners,” also have clear or alleged links to the first family of Azerbaijan.

    The report also points to an almost US$5m public relations campaign for COP 29 – a fee that rivals the $5.8m Azerbaijan paid to UNFCCC to host the conference – that the COP President has praised for improving Azerbaijan’s image, while the Aliyev regime simultaneously heavily represses independent media and civil society. Azerbaijan’s COP 29 organisers have also established an “NGO Coalition,” which includes organisations that the report argues support the propaganda aims of the Aliyev regime. With Azerbaijan’s energy sector heavily dominated by fossil fuels, these tactics mean COP 29 could be abused as a tool for greenwashing, the report argues.

    Transparency International and the Anti-Corruption Data Collective are urging the UNFCCC to take action to safeguard the integrity of COP and prevent hosts of future summits from putting their own agenda before the common good. Recommendations include:

    • Strengthening the process for selecting host countries and corporate sponsors of COPs, ensuring future summits take place in environments where human rights, transparency, freedom of expression and commitment to the goals of the conference are guaranteed.
    • Robust measures to prevent conflicts of interest among hosts, organisers, sponsors and participants from derailing the critical climate deliberations and outcomes.
    • Unrestricted civil society participation and enhanced transparency and accountability rules relating to all COP participants.

    Brice Böhmer, Climate and Environment Lead at Transparency International, said:

    “It is painfully clear that you cannot make meaningful progress against the climate crisis without tackling climate corruption. From influential fossil fuel lobbyists diluting climate commitments to corrupt networks syphoning climate funds, the integrity of the entire global climate framework is at stake.

    “Despite COP now being in its 29th year, there is an unacceptable lack of robust integrity and anti-corruption measures. UNFCCC needs to urgently address the threat posed by corporate interests and fossil fuel industry capture. The integrity standards for COP Presidency need to be the highest possible quality to reestablish trust in the multilateral process.”

    “It is imperative that governments who are committed to keeping the 1.5 degrees Celsius target in sight work closely with the UNFCCC Secretariat to strengthen the guardrails around future COPs.”

    David Szakonyi, Director of the Anti-Corruption Data Collective, said:

    “It is essential that anyone attending this year’s COP, or observing from afar, are wise to the ways that the fossil fuel industry’s interests may be being served. Azerbaijan has been accused of corruption and illicit influence operations in many countries across the world. All too often authoritarian regimes exploit their host status at marquee international events to launder their own reputations, and there are real risks that the same will happen at COP 29 in Azerbaijan. Our report sets out clearly the steps that need to be taken to ensure that COP can be a forum for the ambitious climate action we desperately need.”

    Notes to Editors

    Read the full report: HERE

    Media contact
    Transparency International Secretariat, Berlin
    Telephone: +49 (0) 30 34 38 20 666
    Email: [email protected]


    Transparency International is a global movement with one vision: a world in which government, business, civil society and the daily lives of people are free of corruption. With more than 100 chapters worldwide and an international secretariat in Berlin, we are leading the fight against corruption to turn this vision into reality. www.transparency.org

    The Anti-Corruption Data Collective (ACDC) is a nonprofit group of investigative journalists, data scientists, academics and policy experts working together to expose and prevent the harms to people, planet and politics caused by corporate opacity. www.acdatacollective.org

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI Banking: Urgent action needed to safeguard integrity of COP as fossil fuel influence looms large in Baku, report warns

    Source: Transparency International

    ‘Unacceptable’ lack of guardrails leaves climate talks vulnerable to undue corporate influence and fossil fuel industry capture.

    The upcoming Conference of the Parties (COP) 29 climate summit in Baku, Azerbaijan, is at high risk of being co-opted to promote a pro-fossil fuel industry agenda, according to a new report by Transparency International (TI) and the Anti-Corruption Data Collective (ACDC).

    The report, published today, warns that a lack of robust integrity and anti-corruption measures in the UNFCCC arrangements for COP has opened the door for Azerbaijan’s government to use the summit as diplomatic cover to advance its domestic oil and gas interests and secure new fossil fuel deals. The report finds that not only is the COP 29 President a former executive of SOCAR, Azerbaijan’s state oil company, SOCAR appears to be closely involved in the COP, with its president and members of its supervisory board helping organise the conference. The head of SOCAR has already been seen mixing COP and company business while signing new cooperation agreements with international partners.

    The report also finds that the conference may provide potentially lucrative business opportunities to companies with links to the country’s first family. Ahead of the summit, evidence of potentially corrupt activity has continued to emerge, according to the report, including revelations by investigative journalists that a multi-million dollar no-bid contract for COP 29 guest accommodation was awarded to a business owned by the former son-in-law of Ilham Aliyev, the President of Azerbaijan. Several COP 29 corporate sponsors, or “Green Zone Partners,” also have clear or alleged links to the first family of Azerbaijan.

    The report also points to an almost US$5m public relations campaign for COP 29 – a fee that rivals the $5.8m Azerbaijan paid to UNFCCC to host the conference – that the COP President has praised for improving Azerbaijan’s image, while the Aliyev regime simultaneously heavily represses independent media and civil society. Azerbaijan’s COP 29 organisers have also established an “NGO Coalition,” which includes organisations that the report argues support the propaganda aims of the Aliyev regime. With Azerbaijan’s energy sector heavily dominated by fossil fuels, these tactics mean COP 29 could be abused as a tool for greenwashing, the report argues.

    Transparency International and the Anti-Corruption Data Collective are urging the UNFCCC to take action to safeguard the integrity of COP and prevent hosts of future summits from putting their own agenda before the common good. Recommendations include:

    • Strengthening the process for selecting host countries and corporate sponsors of COPs, ensuring future summits take place in environments where human rights, transparency, freedom of expression and commitment to the goals of the conference are guaranteed.
    • Robust measures to prevent conflicts of interest among hosts, organisers, sponsors and participants from derailing the critical climate deliberations and outcomes.
    • Unrestricted civil society participation and enhanced transparency and accountability rules relating to all COP participants.

    Brice Böhmer, Climate and Environment Lead at Transparency International, said:

    “It is painfully clear that you cannot make meaningful progress against the climate crisis without tackling climate corruption. From influential fossil fuel lobbyists diluting climate commitments to corrupt networks syphoning climate funds, the integrity of the entire global climate framework is at stake.

    “Despite COP now being in its 29th year, there is an unacceptable lack of robust integrity and anti-corruption measures. UNFCCC needs to urgently address the threat posed by corporate interests and fossil fuel industry capture. The integrity standards for COP Presidency need to be the highest possible quality to reestablish trust in the multilateral process.”

    “It is imperative that governments who are committed to keeping the 1.5 degrees Celsius target in sight work closely with the UNFCCC Secretariat to strengthen the guardrails around future COPs.”

    David Szakonyi, Director of the Anti-Corruption Data Collective, said:

    “It is essential that anyone attending this year’s COP, or observing from afar, are wise to the ways that the fossil fuel industry’s interests may be being served. Azerbaijan has been accused of corruption and illicit influence operations in many countries across the world. All too often authoritarian regimes exploit their host status at marquee international events to launder their own reputations, and there are real risks that the same will happen at COP 29 in Azerbaijan. Our report sets out clearly the steps that need to be taken to ensure that COP can be a forum for the ambitious climate action we desperately need.”

    Notes to Editors

    Read the full report: HERE

    Media contact
    Transparency International Secretariat, Berlin
    Telephone: +49 (0) 30 34 38 20 666
    Email: [email protected]


    Transparency International is a global movement with one vision: a world in which government, business, civil society and the daily lives of people are free of corruption. With more than 100 chapters worldwide and an international secretariat in Berlin, we are leading the fight against corruption to turn this vision into reality. www.transparency.org

    The Anti-Corruption Data Collective (ACDC) is a nonprofit group of investigative journalists, data scientists, academics and policy experts working together to expose and prevent the harms to people, planet and politics caused by corporate opacity. www.acdatacollective.org

    MIL OSI Global Banks

  • MIL-OSI USA: Statement from President Joe  Biden on September 2024  PCE

    US Senate News:

    Source: The White House
    Inflation has now fallen to 2.1%—nearly at its 2% target. While critics said we needed a recession to lower inflation, instead inflation has come down while our economy has grown more than 12% over the course of my Administration—the fastest rate of any presidential term in the 21st century. Incomes are up almost $4,000 after accounting for inflation, and gas prices are down to $3.13 per gallon and below $3 in 21 states.
    We have more to do. We will keep fighting to lower costs by building millions of new homes, lowering health insurance premiums, and making child care more affordable. Congressional Republicans are fighting for tax breaks for billionaires and big corporations, while raising costs on families by nearly $4,000 a year with across-the-board tariffs that would cause inflation to skyrocket. They have a cost-raising agenda—we have a cost-cutting agenda.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: 9th European Migration Forum

    Source: European Union 2

    This year’s Forum under the theme “Enhancing the role of civil society in implementing the Pact on Migration and Asylum”, aims to bring civil society organisations together to discuss and engage with EU Member States and policymakers on the challenges and opportunities related to the implementation of the Pact on Migration and Asylum.

    The EMF will particularly address four areas of the Pact:

    Discussions will also focus on the safeguarding of the fundamental rights of migrants and refugees.

    About the Forum

    The European Migration Forum is a platform for dialogue between civil society and European institutions on issues related to migration, asylum, and migrant integration. The aim of the forum is to enhance coordination and cooperation between key players involved in the multilevel European governance of migration.

    As in its previous editions, the Forum’s 9th meeting will seek to ensure an interactive and participatory approach from participants and EU policymakers alike. The event will consist of breakout sessions, working groups related to the four areas, and a practical workshop on financial support. The Forum’s working language will be English.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Economics: InvestiRay: BaFin warns consumers about the website investi-ray.com

    Source: Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht – In English

    The Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) warns consumers about the website investi-ray.com. According to information available to BaFin, financial and investment services are being provided on these websites without the required authorisation. The company is not supervised by BaFin.

    The operator claims to be supervised by “Crypto Assets Control”, which is not an official financial market authority. Anyone providing financial or investment services in Germany may do so only with authorisation from BaFin. Crypto Assets Control does not have the power to grant such authorisation.

    Information on whether particular companies have been authorised by BaFin can be found in BaFin’s database of companies.

    Theinformation provided by BaFin is based on section 37 (4) of the German Banking Act (KreditwesengesetzKWG).

    Please be aware:

    BaFin, the German Federal Criminal Police Office (BundeskriminalamtBKA) and the German state criminal police offices (Landeskriminalämter) recommend that consumers seeking to invest money online should exercise the utmost caution and do the necessary research beforehand in order to identify fraud attempts at an early stage.

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI Economics: IMF Staff Conclude Article IV Discussions and Reach Staff-Level Agreement on the Second Review under the Extended Credit Facility

    Source: International Monetary Fund

    October 31, 2024

    End-of-Mission press releases include statements of IMF staff teams that convey preliminary findings after a visit to a country. The views expressed in this statement are those of the IMF staff and do not necessarily represent the views of the IMF’s Executive Board. Based on the preliminary findings of this mission, staff will prepare a report that, subject to management approval, will be presented to the IMF’s Executive Board for discussion and decision.

    • IMF staff and the Somali authorities have reached a staff level agreement on the second review under the Extended Credit Facility (ECF). Program performance has been strong, demonstrating the authorities’ steadfast commitment to macroeconomic stability and strengthening institutional capacity and frameworks.
    • Real GDP growth has been upgraded to 4 percent for 2024 and 2025 based on strong exports and remittances. However, risks remain elevated, including from regional and domestic security developments, commodity prices and climate shocks.
    • Sustained reform efforts are needed to set the conditions for greater resilience, poverty reduction, and inclusive growth. This includes strengthening tax capacity and public financial management, promoting financial deepening, and improving governance.

    Washington, DC: A staff team from the International Monetary Fund (IMF), led by Ms. Laura Jaramillo, conducted discussions with the Somali authorities in Istanbul and in Washington DC on the 2024 Article IV consultation and reached a staff-level agreement on the second review of the Extended Credit Facility (ECF) arrangement that was approved by the IMF’s Executive Board in December 2023 (Press Release No. 23/463). This agreement is subject to approval of the IMF’s Executive Board.  

    At the conclusion of the discussions, Ms. Jaramillo issued the following statement:

    “Somalia’s real GDP growth outlook has improved, though challenges and risks remain significant. Positive trends in agriculture, exports, and remittances in 2024 are expected to continue in 2025. As a result, real GDP growth has been upgraded to 4 percent in 2024 and 2025, up by an average ¼ percentage point compared to previous forecasts. Inflation is expected to continue on a downward trend to 4.5 percent by end 2024, although the pace is slower than anticipated earlier. Despite security challenges, the Somali government remains steadfast in its fight against terrorism and continues to work with international partners to ensure a successful transition from the current African Union Transition Mission to a new force by January 2025. Near-term risks to the outlook include climate shocks, domestic and regional security developments, lower global growth, and higher commodity prices.

    “The authorities continue to focus on raising domestic revenue, aiming to fully cover operational expenditure with domestic revenues by 2027, while also accommodating higher education and health spending. Fiscal outturns in 2024 have been in line with expectations, and an overall deficit of 0.2 percent of GDP is expected for the year. The 2025 draft budget envisages domestic revenues of 3.3 percent of GDP and an overall fiscal deficit of 0.2 percent of GDP, assuming continued access to grant financing, which remains critical for Somalia.

    “The authorities recognize the importance of making steady progress on fiscal reforms. Key revenue measures—guided by the recently published Medium-term Revenue Roadmap—include the ongoing customs modernization, a new income tax law, and stronger enforcement of sales and income taxes. Public financial management continues to be strengthened, with important progress made on payroll integrity. Reforms to improve the debt management framework and capacity are also progressing well. Measures are also being taken to finalize the extractive industries legal framework, including to enhance transparency and accountability.

    “The Central Bank of Somalia (CBS) is advancing institutional governance and financial sector reforms. Focus is on promoting financial deepening, including by enhancing the legislative and oversight frameworks, improving the quality of regulatory data, and augmenting CBS technical capacity. Efforts continue to strengthen the framework for anti-money laundering and the combating the financing of terrorism to comply with international standards.

    “The authorities intend to reintroduce the Somalia Shilling (SOS) and adopt a currency board arrangement. The new SOS notes will provide an important liquidity function by facilitating payments for small value transactions and will promote financial inclusion for the most vulnerable. To provide a stable and predictable policy environment to ensure confidence in SOS across Somalia, the authorities are also starting preparations for introducing a currency board arrangement, with IMF capacity development support. Implementation of these reforms would take an estimated 18-24 months after prerequisites are in place, including necessary external financing.

    “The authorities are also committed to advancing steps to bolster inclusive growth and poverty reduction, improve resilience to climate shocks, and enhance trade integration. Raising human capital by increasing the educational attainment of Somali children and closing gender gaps in education can bring significant growth dividends. Building resilience against climate shocks and strengthening food security is also a priority. Given Somalia’s very limited resources, financing and technical assistance support from international partners remains crucial. The East African Community presents important opportunities, challenges, and risks for Somalia and the integration process needs to be managed carefully.  

    “The mission would like to express gratitude to Somali authorities for constructive and fruitful discussions. Meetings were held with the Minister of Finance, Minister of Petroleum, the CBS Governor, other government officials, development partners, and representatives from the private sector.”

    IMF Communications Department
    MEDIA RELATIONS

    PRESS OFFICER: Mayada Ghazala

    Phone: +1 202 623-7100Email: MEDIA@IMF.org

    @IMFSpokesperson

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI China: Xi’s article on promoting high-quality, sufficient employment to be published

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    BEIJING, Oct. 31 — An article on promoting high-quality and sufficient employment by Xi Jinping, general secretary of the Communist Party of China (CPC) Central Committee, will be published on Friday.

    The article by Xi, also Chinese president and chairman of the Central Military Commission, will be published in this year’s 21st issue of the Qiushi Journal, a flagship magazine of the CPC Central Committee.

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI Security: Defense News: Navy Recruiting Command Announces FY25 Recruiting Goals

    Source: United States Navy

    For Fiscal Year 2025, the Navy has set a target to recruit 40,600 new Sailors. This reflects the growing needs of the Navy as it continues to modernize and strengthen its capabilities.

    While the Navy is confident in achieving this target, it acknowledges several challenges ahead. The labor market remains competitive, with military service being just one of many career options for young Americans. The Navy recognizes the need to refine its messaging to ensure recruits understand the Navy as a premier choice for professional development, education, and service to the country.

    Moreover, evolving societal expectations around work-life balance and career flexibility will require the Navy to adapt its offerings to remain competitive. The Navy is also preparing to address demographic shifts and the unique expectations of Generation Z, who consume information and make career decisions differently from previous generations. The Navy will continue leveraging digital platforms, personalized outreach, and social media to connect with this new generation of recruits.

    In FY25, the Navy will continue recruiting individuals of the highest caliber who meet the Navy’s culture, mission, and specific roles, offering them the breadth and depth of opportunities that stretch from the depths of the sea to the heights of the stars. The Navy seeks recruits who align with the Navy’s core values and who can meet the physical, mental, and career expectations that come with military service. This approach aims to improve long-term retention, job satisfaction, and overall unit cohesion, ensuring that the Navy is not only well-staffed but also well-prepared to thrive in the future.

    Looking forward to FY25, Rear Adm. James Waters, Commander, Navy Recruiting Command, expressed optimism: “We are building on the foundation of success from FY24 while tackling new challenges head-on. With the strategies we’ve implemented, the talent we have in place, and the support from leadership, I’m confident that we’ll meet our goals and continue to bring in the best and brightest to serve our nation.”

    To learn about careers, joining the Navy, and the latest incentives, visit https://www.navy.com.

    Navy Recruiting Command consists of a command headquarters, two Navy Recruiting Regions, Navy Recruiting Reserve Command, and 26 Navy Talent Acquisition Groups that serve more than 1,000 recruiting stations around the world. Their mission is to attract the highest quality candidates to assure the ongoing success of America’s Navy.

    For more news from Navy Recruiting Command, go to https://www.cnrc.navy.mil. Follow Navy Recruiting on X (@USNRecruiter), Instagram (@USNRecruiter), LinkedIn (https://www.linkedin.com/company/comnavcruitcom), and Facebook (https://www.facebook.com/CommanderNavyRecruitingCommand).

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Canada: CIPO Hosts 26th Annual CIPO-WIPO Executive Program

    Source: Government of Canada News

    The Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO), in collaboration with the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), successfully hosted its 26th annual CIPO-WIPO Executive Program from October 7 to 11, 2024, in the National Capital Region. This Program brought together senior officials from 9 intellectual property (IP) offices around the world to strengthen their skills in IP management and governance.

    On October 7th, 2024, the CEO of CIPO Mr. Konstantinos Georgaras and the Deputy Director General (DDG) of WIPO Mr. Hasan Kleib signed a bilateral Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) on delivering joint training for senior officials from IP Offices around the world. The MOU solidifies collaboration between the two organizations through the revamped CIPO-WIPO Executive Program which started 27 years ago..

    Since its inception in 1997, CIPO has collaborated with WIPO to offer an annual Executive Program, sharing management and governance techniques with IP offices from developing countries. The Program’s objective is to provide capacity building and a forum for exchange between senior IP officials from developing countries and CIPO. This annual event has become a key platform for international collaboration.

    The 2024 Program was re-designed to address current challenges, with sessions focused on reducing backlogs, improving quality control, and introducing new services to better serve stakeholders. 2024 also marked the first in-person edition since the pandemic. CIPO was honored by the attendance of WIPO’s DDG Mr. Hasan Kleib to mark this special occasion.

    “We are proud to continue our long-standing partnership with WIPO to deliver this program, which is instrumental in fostering international cooperation and advancing the global IP system. It is, in fact, CIPO’s flagship technical assistance initiative. This program allows us to share skills and knowledge with IP offices worldwide, exchange practices and experiences, and brainstorm solutions to the changing IP landscape.”

    – Konstantinos Georgaras, Commissioner of Patents, Registrar of Trademarks and Chief Executive Officer

    MIL OSI Canada News

  • MIL-OSI Canada: Premier’s statement on Diwali

    Source: Government of Canada regional news

    Media Contacts

    Office of the Premier

    Media Relations
    premier.media@gov.bc.ca

    https://news.gov.bc.ca/31763

    MIL OSI Canada News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Applying for a private ruling

    Source: Australian Department of Revenue

    The easiest way to send your ruling application is by using one of our forms. They will help you give us the information we need.

    Complete an application form or send a letter

    You can use these forms to apply for a private ruling:

    You can send a letter instead of using a form. Check the Information we need to make sure it is valid and complete.

    Information we need

    You need to include all relevant information in your application even if you use our application forms. You may need to include supporting documents.

    Your questions

    Write clear questions so we can identify your issues accurately and fully. If you’re not a tax professional, you don’t need to refer to the law. If you’re a tax professional, refer to the specific provisions of law you need a ruling on.

    Facts describing the situation

    You must give us a description of all the facts relevant to your scheme or circumstance. Include details of any previous rulings you received on your issue.

    Your private ruling won’t apply if there is any substantial difference between what you:

    • describe in your private ruling
    • actually do.

    If the scheme you describe is only a proposal, the facts must still be reasonably certain. We can’t issue private rulings about hypothetical situations.

    Your arguments and references

    If you’re not a tax agent or other tax professional, this section is optional. If you’re a tax agent or other tax professional, show the results of your research. Include your opinion about how the law applies to the question.

    Valuations

    If your ruling will need a valuation of something, such as an item of plant, we may refer the matter to a professional valuer. They can determine the value or to review a valuation report you’ve included.

    For more information see Private rulings and valuations.

    Supporting documents

    We give details of Supporting documents or information required for common topics private rulings are requested on.

    See Reference guide for private rulings for more information on completing your application.

    Signature

    Lodged by you

    You must sign your application if lodging by fax or post.

    Lodged by your agent

    If the application is lodged by your agent, they must sign a declaration certifying that:

    • The application has been prepared in accordance with information you have supplied.
    • A written declaration has been obtained from you certifying that the information provided is true and correct. This declaration doesn’t need to be lodged with the application but must be presented if requested.
    • The legal personal representative has been authorised to provide the private ruling application.

    The following representatives can be your agent:

    • spouse
    • relative
    • friend
    • another agent
    • tax agent, or
    • other tax professional authorised to give this application to the Commissioner of Taxation.

    If you’re using one of our forms, see How to complete the private ruling application form for information about your signature requirements.

    Send your application

    Online

    If you’re a tax agent, lodge using:

    If you’re an individual or a sole trader or business with an ABN, lodge using:

    If you’re an individual without an ABN, you can’t lodge through our online portals at this time.

    Fax or post

    Fax and postal details for private rulings

    Entity type or matter

    Fax

    Post

    Individuals and micro business (less than $2 million turnover)

    1300 139 011

    Australian Taxation Office
    PO Box 3000
    PENRITH  NSW  2740

    Small and medium businesses and private entities (more than $2 million turnover)

    (02) 6225 0906

    Australian Taxation Office
    PO Box 3000
    PENRITH  NSW  2740

    Not-for-profit

    (02) 6225 0906

    Australian Taxation Office
    PO Box 3000
    PENRITH  NSW  2740

    Excise including fuel schemes and wine equalisation tax

    1300 650 128

    Australian Taxation Office
    PO Box 3001
    PENRITH  NSW  2740

    Superannuation

    1300 669 846

    Australian Taxation Office
    PO Box 3100
    PENRITH  NSW  2740

    Listed companies, foreign owned entities and international matters

    1300 661 106

    Australian Taxation Office
    PO Box 377
    ALBURY  NSW  2640

    Non-commercial losses

    1300 139 011

    Australian Taxation Office
    PO Box 3000
    PENRITH  NSW  2740

    Goods and services tax

    1300 139 031

    Australian Taxation Office
    PO Box 3524
    ALBURY  NSW  2640

    Resource rent taxes (petroleum or mineral)

    1300 139 011

    Australian Taxation Office
    PO Box 1130
    PENRITH  NSW  2740

    Accounting, debt, lodgment or registration matters

    1300 139 035

    Australian Taxation Office
    PO Box 9990
    ALBURY  NSW  2640

    Investment schemes advice

    1800 033 211

    Australian Taxation Office
    PO Box 3546
    ALBURY  NSW  2640

    Timing

    If you want to apply for a private ruling when you lodge your tax return, don’t attach the form to your tax return. Lodge your ruling application separately.

    You must lodge your tax returns and activity statements by the due date, even if you’re waiting for us to give you a private ruling.

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI: Chimoney Launches a cash app for Canadians: Interledger-Powered Global Payments with Just an Email or Phone Number

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Toronto, Oct. 31, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — As Canadians increasingly seek affordable, digital solutions for local and cross-border payments, Chimoney, a Techstars-backed Canadian startup, is thrilled to announce the launch of the Chimoney App, designed specifically for Canadians who want seamless payments in Canada and internationally. Using just an email address or phone number, Chimoney’s app empowers Canadians to send money to over 100 countries quickly and easily and is one of the first Canadian platforms to integrate the open Interledger Protocol (ILP), reinforcing Chimoney’s mission of unlocking economic opportunities for everyone, everywhere.

    “With Canadians conducting over $10.8 trillion in total payment transactions in 2021, the Chimoney App is uniquely positioned to meet the rising demand for seamless payments designed specifically for Canadians in Canada and those living and traveling abroad,” said Uchi Uchibeke, Founder and CEO of Chimoney. “Our integration with Interledger is part of our commitment to giving people financial freedom, letting them send and receive money worldwide without the usual friction.”

    Key Features That Make the Chimoney App Unique

    1. Send Money Globally with Just a Tap
      Canadians can now send money to over 100 countries with only an email or phone number. Chimoney removes the need for traditional bank information, making payments as easy as sending a text message. This feature is especially important for Canadians traveling and looking to share bills, like Dinner bills, between themselves and non Canadians.
    2. Multi-Currency Wallets
      With support for CAD, USD, and NGN, Chimoney App users can hold, manage, and exchange multiple currencies instantly at competitive rates.
    3. Flexible Payment Options
      Recipients choose how they want to receive their funds:
      • Bank account
      • Mobile money
      • Airtime
      • Gift cards
      • Other local options. This flexibility makes Chimoney an ideal solution for anyone receiving international payments.
    4. Universal Payment Links and CAD Bank Accounts
      Freelancers, businesses, and international students can receive payments from clients worldwide with Chimoney’s universal payment links, while CAD bank accounts help Canadians manage their finances locally while connecting globally.
    5. Open Payments with Interledger Integration
      Chimoney is one of the first companies to integrate Interledger, providing Canadians with secure, interoperable payments across borders. With Interledger integration, users can complete transactions on web monetization-enabled pages and receive payments from anyone online.

    Chimoney is Built For Supporting Canadians and Strengthening the Economy

    • Everyday Canadians and Small Businesses
      Chimoney understands the realities Canadians face with rising costs for housing, groceries, and daily expenses. Built for hard-working Canadians and local businesses, Chimoney’s mix of CAD bank accounts, currency exchange, and simple payment solutions provides an affordable way to manage finances and support a stable economy. Whether it’s sending funds across borders or sharing bills, Chimoney offers the financial tools that Canadians deserve.
    • Freelancers and Remote Workers
      Canada’s talented freelance and remote workforce deserves payment options that keep up with their global demand. Chimoney’s Universal Payment Links (UPA) and multi-currency wallets ensure Canadians working for international clients receive payments smoothly and on time while reinforcing Canada’s role as a hub for global talent.
    • International Students Who Respect Canada’s Values
      Chimoney recognizes that Canada attracts top-tier students from around the world, and we’re here to support those who contribute positively to our communities. With Chimoney, international students can manage their finances without additional bank accounts, so they can focus on education and contribute to our society without adding strain on local resources.
    • Canadian Associations and Community Groups
      Chimoney is proud to support Canadian associations, local organizations, and community groups. With dedicated partnership benefits, we’re here to help Canadian-based groups manage finances efficiently while offering perks to their members. For groups that want reliable, Canadian-focused financial tools, Chimoney is an ideal choice to support their unique needs.

    Interledger Protocol Support: Secure, Open, and Reliable The Chimoney App is powered by the open Interledger Protocol, providing Canadians with a secure, fast, and reliable way to transfer funds across borders. This interoperability enables seamless financial inclusion, a groundbreaking feature that sets Chimoney apart from other Canadian payment apps.

    “We’re thrilled to bring this to Canadians,” said Uchi Uchibeke, Founder and CEO of Chimoney. “Our integration with Interledger is part of our commitment to giving people financial freedom, letting them send and receive money worldwide without the usual friction.”

    Download the Chimoney App Today

    Experience seamless, cross-border payments today—download Chimoney on the App Store or Google Play Store.

    About Chimoney: Chimoney is a Toronto-based, Techstars-backed fintech company providing multi-currency Wallets API and infrastructure for cross-border Payments. Through innovative products like the Chimoney App, Chimoney aims to provide unparalleled financial services that promote inclusivity and economic empowerment. With support for payouts in over 100 countries, empowers individuals and businesses to connect financially across borders. With access to over 100 countries, multi-currency wallets, and a focus on innovation and inclusivity, Chimoney serves as a bridge between local simplicity and global reach.

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: HUMAN Uncovers Phish ‘n’ Ships Scheme That Stole Tens of Millions from Unsuspecting Shoppers

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    NEW YORK, Oct. 31, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — HUMAN Security, Inc., the global cybersecurity leader in disrupting bot attacks and preventing digital fraud and abuse, announced today that its Satori Threat Intelligence and Research team has uncovered a complex fraud operation called Phish ‘n’ Ships that stole tens of millions of dollars from unsuspecting consumers hunting for hard-to-find items.

    Named for the operation’s ability to phish consumers of their payment card information while not shipping them the items they believe they paid for, the scheme centered on fake web shops that abuse digital payment providers to steal consumers’ money and payment card information. The Satori team identified over 1,000 infected websites used by the threat actors to stage fake product links, which redirected to 200+ fake webshops with 121 still active during the investigation. Through consultations with the affected payment processors, Phish ’n’ Ships has been disrupted: the fake product listings that made up a key source of traffic to the fake web stores have been removed by Google from the search results, and the threat actors’ accounts have been removed from the payment processor platforms. Dozens of storefronts were taken down in collaboration with HUMAN partners. However, the operation is still active, and Satori researchers continue to monitor the threat actors for new evolutions of the scheme.

    “Phish ‘n’ Ships is especially devious because it stole tens of millions of dollars from unsuspecting consumers hunting for hard-to-find items,” said Gavin Reid, Chief Information Security Officer at HUMAN. “We’ve estimated that hundreds of thousands of consumers were victimized over the past five years due to this scheme. Especially during the holiday season when more consumers will be online shopping for gifts, helping our clients protect their customers from threats like these is paramount.”

    The scheme reinforces the role digital advertising plays in fraud, since ads and sponsored search listings lead unsuspecting consumers to fake web stores. The threat actors behind Phish ‘n’ Ships used well-known vulnerabilities to infect over 1,000 websites and stage fake product listings that reached the top of search results in Dutch, English, French, and German. The techniques used included coordination of search results, SEO poisoning and cashing out with fake shops.

    “Phish ‘n’ Ships underscores the value across the entire customer journey of a unified approach to digital fraud and abuse,” said Lindsay Kaye, Vice President of Threat Intelligence at HUMAN. “Components of the scheme targeted consumers at every stage in their buying journey, from seeing and clicking on an ad to arriving on and interacting with a web store to checking out through a payment provider integration. Understanding and stopping Phish ‘n’ Ships requires a full-spectrum plan of attack.”

    HUMAN customers were not directly affected by this threat. Our Satori Threat Intelligence and Research team proactively hunts for—and disrupts—new and emerging threats like Phish ‘n’ Ships, protecting HUMAN customers from the impacts of digital fraud. HUMAN customers enjoy priority access to information about investigations like Phish ‘n’ Ships and benefit from the enhanced AI-derived capabilities of our Decision Engine.

    About HUMAN

    HUMAN is a leading cybersecurity company committed to protecting the integrity of the digital world. We ensure that every digital interaction, transaction, and connection is authentic, secure, and human. The Human Defense Platform safeguards the entire customer journey with high-fidelity decision-making that defends against bots, fraud, and digital threats. Each week, HUMAN verifies 20 trillion digital interactions, providing unparalleled telemetry data to enable rapid, effective responses to even the most sophisticated threats. Recognized by our customers as a G2 Leader, HUMAN continues to set the standard in cybersecurity. To ensure your digital connections are trusted, visit www.humansecurity.com

    Contact:

    Masha Krylova, Director of Communications

    press@humansecurity.com

    A photo accompanying this announcement is available at https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/66bca057-8466-45cc-8773-a20bf18312f2

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Europe: ECB publishes consolidated banking data for end-June 2024

    Source: European Central Bank

    31 October 2024

    Chart 1

    Total assets of credit institutions headquartered in the EU

    (EUR billions)

    Source: ECB

    Note: Data for all reference periods relate to the EU27.

    Data on the aggregate of total assets of credit institutions headquartered in the EU

    Chart 2

    Non-performing loans ratio of credit institutions headquartered in the EU

    (EUR billions; percentages)

    Source: ECB

    Note: Data for all reference periods relate to the EU27.

    Data on the aggregate non-performing loans ratio of credit institutions headquartered in the EU

    Chart 3

    Return on equity of credit institutions headquartered in the EU in June 2024

    (percentages)

    Source: ECB

    Note: Data for all reference periods relate to the EU27.

    Data on the aggregate return on equity of credit institutions headquartered in the EU

    Chart 4

    Common Equity Tier 1 ratio of credit institutions headquartered in the EU in June 2024

    (percentages)

    Source: ECB

    Note: Data for all reference periods relate to the EU27.

    Data on the aggregate Common Equity Tier 1 ratio of credit institutions headquartered in the EU

    The European Central Bank (ECB) has published consolidated banking data as at end-June 2024, a dataset for the EU banking system compiled on a group consolidated basis.

    The quarterly data provide information required to analyse the EU banking sector and comprise a subset of the information that is available in the year-end dataset. The data cover 344 banking groups and 2374 stand-alone credit institutions and non-EU controlled subsidiaries and branches operating in the EU, accounting for nearly 100% of the EU banking sector’s balance sheet. They include an extensive range of indicators on profitability and efficiency, balance sheet composition, liquidity and funding, asset quality, asset encumbrance, capital adequacy and solvency. Aggregates and indicators are published for the reporting population.

    Reporters generally apply International Financial Reporting Standards and the European Banking Authority’s Implementing Technical Standards on Supervisory Reporting. However, some small and medium-sized reporters may apply national accounting standards. Accordingly, aggregates and indicators may include some data that are based on national accounting standards, depending on the availability of the underlying items.

    In addition to data as at end-June 2024, the published figures also include a few revisions to past data.

    For media queries, please contact Nicos Keranis, tel.: +49 69 1344 5482.

    Notes

    • These consolidated banking data are available in the ECB Data Portal.
    • More information about the methodology used to compile the data is available on the ECB’s website.
    • Hyperlinks in the main body of the press release lead to data that may change with subsequent releases as a result of revisions.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform Bill update

    Source: Scottish Government

    Amendments to landmark legislation.

    Justice Secretary Angela Constance has updated Parliament on proposed amendments to the Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform Bill.

    The Justice Secretary told MSPs that, having listened to the cross-party Criminal Justice Committee and a wide range of other views, a plan to enable a time-limited pilot of single-judge trials for rape and attempted rape cases will not be pursued.

    The Government also plans to amend the Bill, subject to MSPs’ approval, to enable more detailed research into jury deliberations, including how rape myths may affect verdicts.

    The Bill includes measures to remove Scotland’s ‘not proven’ verdict and to increase the current simple majority required for a criminal conviction to a two-thirds majority of jurors. However, in line with committee recommendations, proposals to cut the jury size from 15 to 12 will be dropped.

    Victims of crime are to receive improved support, advice and information as part of planned reforms to the Victim Notification Scheme – to be delivered through the Bill – as announced earlier this month.

    Ms Constance said:

    “This Bill proposes a significant package of reforms to ensure victims are placed at the heart of Scotland’s justice system, such as creating a specialist Sexual Offences Court, establishing a Victims & Witnesses Commissioner and abolishing the ‘not proven’ verdict.

    “I want to build as much consensus as possible for this important legislation. Clearly there is not enough parliamentary support at this time for the proposal to enable a time-limited pilot of single-judge trials for cases of rape and attempted rape, so we will no longer pursue this.

    “I remain concerned by the substantial evidence that juries may be influenced by rape myths and I will introduce amendments to the Bill to allow for more detailed research into jury deliberations. We will undertake further work with justice partners to agree how to challenge and reduce the impact of rape myths. This might include, for example, further interventions or educational resources for jurors and the wider public.

    “I believe that the most prudent approach to jury reform, including the abolition of the ‘not proven’ verdict, is to seek support for a model with two verdicts – ‘guilty’ and ‘not guilty’ – 15 jurors, and a two-thirds majority requirement for conviction.

    “I look forward to working with partners and colleagues across Parliament to deliver what I believe is a shared ambition to ensure victims and witnesses are placed at the heart of the justice system and treated with compassion.”

    Background

    Justice Secretary’s letter to the Criminal Justice Committee

    Improved support for crime victims

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI Canada: Keynote – 2024 Nuclear Law School

    Source: Government of Canada News

    On October 25, 2024, Pierre Tremblay, CNSC President and CEO, delivered the keynote address at the Canadian Nuclear Law Organization’s Nuclear Law School 2024, held in Toronto, Ontario. In his remarks, he spoke about areas of focus for the CNSC and the important function the CNSC’s Legal Services team plays in supporting Canada’s nuclear regulator.  

    – Check against delivery – 

    Introduction

    Good afternoon, everyone. Thank you for that kind introduction.  

    Bonjour. Merci pour cette aimable présentation. 

    I would like to acknowledge that we are gathered here today on the traditional territory of many nations, including the Mississaugas of the Credit, the Anishnabeg, the Chippewa, the Haudenosaunee and the Wendat peoples, and on what is now home to many diverse First Nations, Inuit, and Métis peoples. 

    I am honoured to work with and learn from communities across unceded lands throughout Canada, and want to acknowledge all First Nations, Inuit, and Métis peoples who’s original and treaty territories we stand upon across Turtle Island.

    As mentioned, I am Pierre Tremblay, President of the 

    Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission, or CNSC. I have now had the privilege of leading the CNSC for almost 3 months, and I could not be happier to be speaking to you all today on behalf of the regulator. 

    I’m so pleased you have also had the opportunity to hear from some of the CNSC’s many experts, with Pascale Bourassa speaking about the practical considerations around compliance with and enforcement of the nuclear regulatory requirements for Canadian export controls. 

    And from Catherine Howlett on the role of the regulator and how we intend to manage licensing decisions in the context of the Impact Assessment Act. 

    I myself have 40 years in Canada’s nuclear sector, all of which have been very rewarding. My career has given me a deep appreciation and respect for the people who work in the sector and their shared focus on safety and the culture that supports it. 

    My new position with the CNSC is affording me the opportunity to play an essential role in the nuclear sector by serving the public in protecting Canada’s environment and its people. 

    The CNSC is a world class nuclear regulator and I’m honoured to be leading this organization through such an exciting period for the nuclear sector. 

    For my remarks this afternoon, I’d like to speak about the work the CNSC is doing to fulfil our important mandate, while ensuring our readiness for the future.

    Important Work of the Regulator

    As Canada’s nuclear regulator, the CNSC oversees the full lifecycle of nuclear facilities and activities, regulating the use of nuclear energy and materials to protect the health, safety, and security of people and the environment while ensuring Canada’s respect for its international obligations, including non-proliferation. 

    All licensing decisions are made by the Commission, a quasi-judicial, independent tribunal set up at arm’s length from government, and with no ties to the nuclear industry. 

    This is an interesting and crucial time for Canada’s nuclear sector. With a growing global energy demand, driven by electrification and our collective response to climate change, the potential for nuclear as a reliable baseload energy source is significant.

    Given Canada’s long history and expertise in the nuclear field, there is of course a strong interest in maintaining its competitive advantage, and to keep pace with countries that are heavily investing in nuclear.

    While the CNSC is independent and impartial, we are aware of and engaged with the external environment in which nuclear operates. 

    The increased attention on and priority of nuclear are important factors motivating the CNSC to ensure regulatory readiness and efficiency. 

    This is particularly true as we prepare for the eventual deployment of advanced and small modular reactor technologies.

    In regulating to ensure safety, readiness and efficiency is achievable with no corners being cut. Our expectations for industry are the same. Together, we can all ensure the safe deployment of nuclear projects.

    The possibility of the broad deployment of small modular reactors – or SMRs – requires us to be ready in new and different ways.

    This is just one driver to modernize our regulatory framework and practices. 

    As a part of our modernization efforts, we undertook a full strategic review of the CNSC’s regulatory framework to identify gaps and opportunities for improvement to ensure clarity of requirements for SMRs, such as shifting from a prescriptive approach to a technology-neutral performance-based approach.

    This includes proposed Nuclear Security Regulations that respond to changes in security threats and adapt to technological advancements. 

    The current regulations do not in our view adequately consider a risk-informed approach – nor do they consider different technologies, sizes, locations, and alternative approaches to address potential security threats and risks. 

    This could prevent licensees and proponents from using new security technologies or innovative practices that meet – or exceed – the regulatory objective to delay potential adversaries. 

    Mind you, modernizing our regulations isn’t new. It is a continuation of years of work and something the CNSC is always in the process of doing.

    For example, in 2020, following extensive consultation, the Radiation Protection Regulations were updated to enhance protections for nuclear sector works, including accommodations for workers who are breastfeeding, and a lower annual limit for radiation doses to the lens of the eye.

    This is just one example where we have leveraged over 20 years of experience with the Nuclear Safety and Control Act and advances in science to ensure our regulatory framework reflects our current and modern reality.

    By necessity, this work is ongoing. As the sector evolves, so does the regulatory landscape.

    We are also ensuring we do not work in isolation. As we modernize and ready ourselves for new technologies, we continue to look for ways to collaborate and coordinate with other government agencies here at home, as well as our regulatory counterparts around the world. 

    For example, the CNSC is working closely with the Impact Assessment Agency of Canada to ensure processes are well aligned to reduce duplication of work. 

    The CNSC recognizes the vital role of the Impact Assessment Agency of Canada. The renewed emphasis on nuclear in the pursuit of clean growth requires many agencies to play equally important roles.

    We remain committed to supporting the work of our partners and the Government’s action plan – Building Canada’s Clean Future – while continuing to honour our own commitment of being efficient as the nuclear safety regulator.

    It’s not just coordination at home. International cooperation has far-reaching benefits for world-wide nuclear safety and helps to ensure a streamlined and safe approach to deployment for these projects. 

    CNSC along with our colleagues in the US and UK have taken essential steps to enable the sharing of knowledge and best practices to foster the safe deployment of nuclear technologies worldwide. 

    Agreements such as the trilateral Memorandum of Cooperation between the CNSC, the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the UK’s Office for Nuclear Regulation support collaboration on the technical reviews of advanced reactor and SMR technologies.

    Under this agreement we work together to develop shared technical assessment approaches, collaborate on pre-application activities to ensure mutual preparedness, and collaborate on research, training, and in the development of regulatory approaches. 

    Preparing for the future is a global effort. When we join forces with international organizations, our collective expertise can grow considerably and accelerate our progress, while also enhancing our primary focus on safety. 

    Together, we will be well-equipped to manage any challenges that we may face. 

    The CNSC’s mandate also includes communicating objective scientific, technical, and regulatory information to the public. 

    As the regulator, we must instill confidence in Canadians that decisions are risk-informed, evidence- and science-based. And that the safety of Canadians and the environment are at the forefront of all that we do. 

    We do this by communicating and engaging with the public we serve – and by disseminating objective information to the public. 

    Nuclear technologies and activities are not limited by Canada’s provincial and territorial borders. 

    And so, we share information with and provide opportunities for engagement to all Canadians, not just those in the traditional nuclear-host communities. 

    The CNSC also encourages open dialogue through consultation and engagement, with staff from across our organization engaging with communities and stakeholders nationwide.

    In practice, this includes participating in community events, engaging with the public and intervenors during Commission proceedings, delivering educational presentations, and continuing to prioritize relationship-building with Indigenous Nations and communities through continued and meaningful engagement, consultation and mutual learning.

    Effective communication and engagement build trust through openness, transparency and listening – and public trust is critical. 

    We are doing our part and expect industry to do the same. 

    The CNSC has outlined such expectations clearly in our regulatory documents for Indigenous engagement and public information and disclosure. 

    Proponents and industry have the responsibility to develop meaningful, long-term relationships with Indigenous Nations and communities whose treaty lands, territories, and potential and established rights could be impacted by nuclear activities. 

    They must also develop and maintain programs that ensure effective communication with the public as a licensing condition. 

    Only through such efforts will they earn trust and support for their projects. 

    We as the regulator will be watching and expect performance to be maintained as new technologies are sought after. 

    Internal efforts

    I have mentioned a few times today, that safety is our top priority. A strong safety culture is an essential component, helping to build trust within the organization, as well as with the public we serve.

    That is why the CNSC continues to prioritize understanding and strengthening our regulatory safety culture through various mechanisms, most recently through the Independent Safety Culture Assessment led by the International Atomic Energy Agency, or IAEA. 

    With almost 80 years of nuclear safety and security in Canada, our long history has taught us the importance of self-reflection and the need for continuous improvement, and that complacency is the enemy of excellence.

    We know that a culture for safety is an ongoing journey, which is why we continue to look for opportunities such as this mission to support our reflection and self-improvement. The IAEA recognized this in their preliminary findings, noting that we demonstrate a continued commitment for external review to help continuously improve. They recognized the strong personal commitment of staff to the CNSC safety mission, and our recognition that we face a significant amount of change in the coming years which we will need to continue to prepare for.

    The CNSC has also worked to better understand the important role diversity and inclusion play in safety culture. We know that diverse voices lead to better decision-making and better safety outcomes. 

    While I may not have faced the challenges in my career that some have, I am very aware of the need to direct our energies and efforts to ensure diversity in the talent pipeline. 

    Efforts such as this will let us engage the best and the brightest. It will foster innovation and improve our regulatory decisions. Complex challenges like those we face in the nuclear sector require varied perspectives. 

    Conclusion

    Many of you may be wondering, where do I fit? What role do I have to play? 

    There is value in gaining operational experience, which can be obtained in many ways. We live in a dynamic world, and our legislative framework is ever evolving. Embrace that uncertainty and the change that comes with it and challenge yourselves to continuously grow and learn. 

    The CNSC’s Legal Services team is a great example of this. They are an integral part of our organization, both in day-to-day operations as well as part of our management team. They act as counsel at Commission hearings and represent the CNSC in litigation. 

    Our Legal Services team directly supports the business of the CNSC as the regulator and, as such, contributes to the broader nuclear sector. 

    They do this by providing in-house legal advice to the CNSC, including advice on the interpretation of the Nuclear Safety and Control Act and its related regulations and other legislation that may affect CNSC operations. With their experience and knowledge, they assist the Commission in its modernization efforts to find ever more effective means of delivering on its mandate.

    As lawyers, you know that you do not make policy. You interpret the law and give advice. You are not in a position to dictate outcomes; rather you provide strategic legal perspectives that bring valuable insight and contributions through your work.

    There is a necessary balance here. Courageous decision-making is needed at this time, and your legal advice to your clients can help them advance their important priorities. 

    We are at a critical point in history. And we have lots to do. 

    I can reassure you that the CNSC will be here making sure that safety remains top of mind for everyone. 

    There is a strong foundation in place and a great deal of work already underway to ensure we are ready. I am eager to guide the CNSC as an organization as we continue this journey.

    This is a very exciting time for the nuclear sector, and I look forward to what the future holds.

    Thank you again for inviting me to speak at your 2024 Nuclear Law School, I look forward to answering any questions you may have. 

    MIL OSI Canada News

  • MIL-OSI Canada: Government of Canada to announce support for the YMCA of Southwestern New Brunswick

    Source: Government of Canada News

    Government of Canada to announce support for the YMCA of Southwestern New Brunswick

    Saint John, New Brunswick · October 31, 2024 · Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency (ACOA)

    Wayne Long, Member of Parliament for Saint John – Rothesay, on behalf of the Honourable Gudie Hutchings, Minister of Rural Economic Development and Minister responsible for ACOA, will make an announcement regarding  the YMCA’s Glenn Carpenter Outdoor Education Centre
     

    Date: November 1, 2024

    Time: 11:00 a.m.       

    Location:
    YMCA of Southwestern New Brunswick
    191 Churchill Boulevard
    Saint John, New Brunswick
    E2K 3E2

    Connor Burton
    Press Secretary
    Office of the Minister of Rural Economic Development and of the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency
    Connor.Burton@acoa-apeca.gc.ca

    MIL OSI Canada News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Exceptional Teachers Chosen for Master Teacher Program

    Source: US State of New York

    Governor Kathy Hochul today announced the selection of 144 STEM teachers for the New York State Master Teacher Program, a professional network of more than 1,700 public-school teachers with a passion for inspiring the next generation of educational leaders. Twenty-six counselors were also selected as part of the inaugural Master Counselor Program.

    “Here in New York, we are incredibly grateful for our teachers’ and counselors’ dedication to inspiring and shaping the minds of our students – the next generation of leaders in our state,” Governor Hochul said. “Through the New York State Master Teacher Program, we’re recognizing the hardworking educational leaders who are helping us build a world-class education system here in New York for generations to come.”

    In addition, the application process for the next round is open now through January 26, 2025. Interested applicants can review the eligibility requirements and attend an information session with program staff.

    The new members represent 83 school districts with a Master Teacher or Master Counselor among their faculty, with 40 program members from high-needs districts including Albany, Buffalo, Binghamton, Plattsburgh City, Rochester, Schenectady, Syracuse, Utica, and, for counselors, New York City School Districts.

    Master Teachers support students in grades K-12 in the areas of science, technology, computer science, robotics, coding, engineering, math, and integrated STEM.

    More than half of the new members have been in the classroom for more than ten years, and more than 45 percent have been teaching for 15 or more years. The incoming group of Master Teachers is comprised of 25 percent elementary level teachers, 48 teachers with multiple teaching certifications, 15 teachers certified in Special Education and two teachers who hold a Bilingual Education Extension.

    The Master Counselors are active members of their professional associations serving in leadership roles, and regularly engage with local industries to help students and their families chart a path to student success. More than half of the 2024 Master Counselors have been in a counseling role for longer than ten years. The counselors serve in various district-level and state-level roles, joining the program as experienced leaders dedicated to developing and sharing best practices. One-third of the Master Counselors hold additional certificates or NYS trainings including Occupational Therapy, Disability Services, National Board, and Mental Health Counseling.

    SUNY Chancellor John B. King Jr. said, “As the state’s largest educator preparation provider, SUNY is proud of the success of all teachers and school counselors throughout their careers. We applaud Governor Hochul for recognizing excellence in teaching as well as the importance of school counselors in helping New York State students achieve their aspirations for college and careers.”

    Master Teachers and Master Counselors are leaders in their professions, serving as mentors for students and early-career teachers and counselors. Many new members have been awarded grants for STEM or counseling program resources. The Master Teacher Program is hosted at nine SUNY campuses to leverage the expertise of the University’s faculty and existing educator preparation programs, and SUNY counterparts collaborate regularly with local STEM career and industry experts.

    The total number of teachers and counselors selected from each region, and the respective partner SUNY campus, are:

    • Capital Region: 219 Master Teachers and 4 Master Counselors (University at Albany)
    • Central New York: 213 Master Teachers and 3 Master Counselors (SUNY Cortland)
    • Finger Lakes: 223 Master Teachers and 3 Master Counselors (SUNY Geneseo)
    • Long Island: 206 Master Teachers and 5 Master Counselor (Stony Brook University)
    • Mid-Hudson: 200 Master Teachers and 7 Master Counselors (SUNY New Paltz)
    • Mohawk Valley: 140 Master Teachers and 4 Master Counselors (SUNY Oneonta)
    • North Country: 130 Master Teachers and 6 Master Counselor (SUNY Plattsburgh)
    • Southern Tier: 252 Master Teachers and 7 Master Counselors (Binghamton University)
    • Western New York: 244 Master Teachers and 7Master Counselors (SUNY Buffalo State)
    • New York City: 160 Master Teachers (in partnership with Math for America) and 5 Master Counselors

    Throughout their four-year participation in the Program, Master Teachers, and Master Counselors will receive a $15,000 stipend annually; engage in peer mentoring and intensive content-oriented professional development opportunities throughout the academic year; work closely with pre-service and early career teachers and counselors to foster a supportive environment for the next generation of STEM teachers and counselors; and attend required regional meetings to participate in and lead professional development sessions each year.

    A full list of Master Teachers and Counselors and their school districts is available.

    MIL OSI USA News