Blog

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Eligible spending under ReArm Europe – E-001294/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The classification of the functions of government (COFOG) is a classification of transactions designed to apply to general government and its subsectors.

    In the current version of the COFOG classification, which is used both globally and in Europe, there are 10 divisions, including division 02 Defence.

    The classification is centred on primary purpose of government expenditure. Thus, division 02 Defence captures all government expenditure with primary purpose of supporting and developing defence capabilities, but it excludes expenditure and investment that has other primary purposes, like climate change.

    The activation of the national escape clause of the Stability and Growth Pact for defence[1] was justified by the exceptional circumstances created by Russia’s aggression of Ukraine and its major impact on Member States’ public finances.

    The activation is framed in scope, size, and time to cater for a quick transition to a higher defence spending regime while preserving fiscal sustainability.

    Member States should use the financial assistance provided under the Security Action for Europe (SAFE) Regulation[2] to carry out common procurements. Eligible defence common procurement should relate to the list of priority areas identified by Article 1 of SAFE Regulation.

    In addition, Article 16 sets out eligibility conditions applying to contractors, subcontractors and products participating in common procurement supported by SAFE.

    Therefore, to be supported under the SAFE instrument, investments also contributing to tackling climate change need to fall into one of the areas identified in Article 1 of SAFE Regulation and be channelled through common procurement, which complies with the eligibility conditions set out in the regulation.

    • [1] https://defence-industry-space.ec.europa.eu/document/download/a57304ce-1a98-4a2c-aed5-36485884f1a0_en?filename=Communication-on-the-national-escape-clause.pdf.
    • [2] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2025/1106/oj/eng.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Inhumane conditions in EU-funded Greek reception centres – E-001589/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The general rules on material reception conditions and healthcare foreseen in Article 19 of the recast Reception Conditions Directive[1] must be applied by all Member States.

    The Pact on Migration and Asylum[2] will provide Member States with an opportunity to align national legislation and practices with EU law.

    In this regard, the Commission is carefully monitoring the way in which all Member States will transpose the recast Reception Conditions Directive into national law by 12 June 2026, including in particular Article 19 of this directive.

    The Commission’s dedicated Task Force for Migration Management[3] coordinates with relevant Greek authorities and actors, as they fulfil their duty to provide, in particular, adequate reception facilities and protection of unaccompanied minors and other vulnerable groups, among other areas.

    The Commission conducts audits and on-the-spot checks to ensure that every euro from the budget is spent in line with the rules and generates added value[4].

    If the Commission discovers deficiencies, it can intervene by interrupting or suspending payments to beneficiaries or Member States. If at a later stage the Commission detects any wrongdoing, it can introduce financial corrections and recover the funds already paid.

    The Commission opened an infringement procedure in January 2023 by sending a letter of formal notice to Greece[5], for incorrectly transposing certain provisions of the Reception Conditions Directive and is in close contact with the Greek authorities to ensure its correct transposition and application of the recast Reception Conditions Directive. The Commission will continue to monitor transposition in light of the Pact provisions.

    • [1] Directive (EU) 2024/1346 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 May 2024 laying down standards for the reception of applicants for international protection, OJ L, 2024/1346, 22.5.2024, http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2024/1346/oj.
    • [2] https://home-affairs.ec.europa.eu/policies/migration-and-asylum/pact-migration-and-asylum_en.
    • [3] Commission press release (IP/20/1728) of 23 September 2020, https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_20_1728.
    • [4] In the case of the Home Affairs Funds programs, the Member States’ authorities are responsible for selecting the projects to finance in accordance with the relevant EU rules and assume responsibility for the day-to-day management and for ensuring that the actions supported by the funds are implemented correctly and effectively.
    • [5] On 26 January 2023 the Commission sent letters of formal notice to Greece alleging failure to transpose in a fully conform manner all provisions of Directive 2013/33/EU (the Reception Conditions Directive).
    Last updated: 2 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Safeguarding European citric acid production against unfair competition from China – E-001942/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    Since 2008, there are anti-dumping measures in place on imports of citric acid from China ranging between 16.3% and 42.7%. These measures were extended for a further five years, in April 2021, following an expiry review[1].

    These measures reflect the levels of dumping found in the context of an investigation conducted in line with World Trade Organisation and EU legislation.

    Measures in place may be reviewed on request by interested parties where there are changed circumstances of a lasting nature. The Commission conducts such reviews where it receives evidence from the European industry that action is warranted. The industries affected are invited to contact the Commission’s trade defence services[2] to explore the options.

    As regards the speed of trade defence investigations, in the modernisation of trade defence in 2018, the length of anti-dumping investigations was shortened by one month. Provisional measures are now imposed eight, and in some cases seven months after initiation.

    Also, since October 2024 the Commission registers imports in all ongoing new investigations to facilitate the retroactive application of measures, i.e. before the date of provisional measures, if the legal conditions allow[3].

    With regard to additional support measures, it should be noted that the Joint European Forum for Important Projects of Common European Interest (IPCEI) is currently working on identifying a possible IPCEI candidate in the field of biotechnologies.

    Interested companies are invited to contact their respective national authorities to confirm whether their Member State is involved in this work and to inquire whether they may be included in the national consultation process.

    • [1] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32021R0607&from=EN.
    • [2] https://policy.trade.ec.europa.eu/contacts/trade-defence-enquiries_en.
    • [3] https://policy.trade.ec.europa.eu/news/commission-register-imports-all-products-under-trade-defence-investigations-bid-fight-unfair-2024-09-24_en.
    Last updated: 2 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Adoption of Decree-Law No 48 of 11 April 2025 laying down provisions prohibiting production and marketing of industrial hemp and hemp products in Italy – E-001571/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    1. The Commission has received multiple complaints regarding a proposed amendment to the Italian law on public security that would restrict the movement of hemp inflorescences or products containing such inflorescences. The Commission understands that while this amendment is under examination in the Senate, the Italian Government has recently adopted a decree-law which includes similar provisions[1]. As the investigation of the complaints is ongoing, the Commission is unable to provide the Honourable Members with further information in this regard.

    2. The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has held that the non-notification of a technical regulation under Article 5 of Directive (EU) 2015/1535[2] entails the risk of creating hindrances to intra EU trade and that a national court is required to refuse to apply a national technical regulation that was not notified under that provision[3]. As mentioned in reply to the first question, the Commission is currently assessing the compliance of the Italian measure with Union law.

    3. National courts are tasked with implementing EU law and have the power or even the obligation (courts of last instance) to refer a matter to the CJEU if a case pending before them raises questions involving the interpretation of EU law[4]. It is up to the national courts to review the decisions taken by national authorities in individual cases; the Commission has no authority in this regard. For more information on how the Commission ensures the application, implementation and enforcement of EU law and the tools at its disposal to this effect, the Commission refers the Honourable Members to its communications ‘EU law: Better results through better application’[5] and ‘Enforcing EU law for a Europe that delivers’[6].

    • [1] The decree-law in question (Disposizioni urgenti in materia di sicurezza pubblica, di tutela del personale in servizio, nonche’ di vittime dell’usura e di ordinamento penitenziario) was published in the Italian Official Journal (Gazzetta Ufficiale) General Series no 85 of 11 April 2025 (GU Serie Generale n.85 del 11-04-2025).
    • [2] Directive (EU) 2015/1535 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 September 2015 laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical regulations and of rules on Information Society services, OJ L 241, 17.9.2015, p. 1-15.
    • [3] Judgment of the Court of 30 April 1996 in Case C-194/94, CIA Security International, ECLI:EU:C:1996:172, para.55.
    • [4] See Opinion 1/09 of the Court (Agreement creating a Unified Patent Litigation System) of 8 March 2011, EU:C:2011:123, paragraphs 80 and 83.
    • [5] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=oj:JOC_2017_018_R_0002.
    • [6] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52022DC0518.
    Last updated: 2 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: IDB and EIB strengthen partnership to boost development impact

    Source: European Investment Bank

    EIB

    The Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) and the European Investment Bank (EIB) signed a cooperation agreement to increase financing and deliver stronger development impact in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC), during the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development (FFD4) in Seville.

    The agreement reflects a shared commitment by both institutions to work closer and more effectively as a system to increase resource mobilisation for the financing of sustainable development in LAC. It also strengthens the pipeline of EU-aligned financing under the European Union’s Global Gateway, helping to convert priorities into results on the ground in Latin America and the Caribbean.

    The partnership aims to: 

    • Scale up joint financing – through increased co-financing, including joint sovereign-guaranteed operations such as Results-Based Loans in priority sectors.
    • Mobilise private capital – by streamlining collaboration on non-sovereign operations and scaling financial innovations such as blended finance, de-linked guarantees, and co-guarantees to reduce risk and attract investment.
    • Strengthen system-wide collaboration – by exploring exposure exchange agreements, expanding mutual reliance beyond procurement to include environmental and social standards and results frameworks, and promoting staff exchanges to deepen operational alignment.
    • Align European resources with LAC priorities – by translating Global Gateway objectives into actionable pipelines and maximising the impact of EU funding across LAC.

    “This agreement shows what MDBs can do when we act as a system – aligning tools, mobilising capital and speeding up delivery. Together with the EIB, we’re also strengthening the bridge between Europe and Latin America and the Caribbean, while creating impact on the ground,” said IDB President Ilan Goldfajn.

    “Europe supports Latin America and the Caribbean. This new agreement strengthens our strategic partnership, which is key to developing our projects and having greater impact on the ground,” said EIB Group President Nadia Calviño.

    About the IDB

    The Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) is devoted to improving lives across Latin America and the Caribbean. Founded in 1959, the IDB works with the region’s public sector to design and enable impactful, innovative solutions for sustainable and inclusive development. Leveraging financing, technical expertise and knowledge, it promotes growth and well-being in 26 countries.

    About EIB Global:

    The European Investment Bank (ElB) is the long-term lending institution of the European Union, owned by the Member States. It finances investments that pursue EU policy objectives.

    EIB Global is the EIB Group’s specialised arm devoted to increasing the impact of international partnerships and development finance, and a key partner of Global Gateway. It aims to support €100 billion of investment by the end of 2027 – around one-third of the overall target of this EU initiative. Within Team Europe, EIB Global fosters strong, focused partnerships alongside fellow development finance institutions and civil society. EIB Global brings the EIB Group closer to people, companies and institutions through its offices across the world. Photos of EIB headquarters for media use are available here. http://twitter.com/EIB https://www.linkedin.com/company/eib-global/

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Labelling and transparency requirements for hybrid meat products – E-001859/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    1. Regulation (EU) 1169/2011[1] enables consumers to make informed food choices and provides that as any pre-packed foods, mixture of ingredients including meat products as well as plant-based ingredients must contain in their label a nutrition declaration providing consumers information on energy value; and the amounts of fat, saturates, carbohydrate, sugars, protein and salt.

    2. Moreover, in Case C-438/23[2], the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) provided guidance on the labelling of foods normally composed of meat products, where meat ingredients were substituted by plant ones. The CJEU clarified that the labelling of such foods must clearly indicate this substitution. This information must appear near the name of the product, in a font sufficiently large against the name of products. The CJEU further confirmed that such positioning and clarity are sufficient to ensure consumers are not misled about the nature of the product.

    3. Indication of any ingredient or processing aid causing allergies or intolerances used in the manufacture or preparation of a food and still present in the finished product, even if in an altered form is mandatory in accordance with Article 9(1)(c) of the regulation No 1169/2011 in the list of ingredients.

    • [1] http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2011/1169/oj.
    • [2] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A62023CJ0438.
    Last updated: 2 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS): a critical environmental challenge – E-001846/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The REACH Regulation has restricted the placing on the market and use of some per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS); a dossier for additional restrictions on the whole PFAS family is ongoing[1][2][3].

    The proposal for a Soil Monitoring Law[4] introduces a monitoring framework for EU soils and a register of potentially contaminated and contaminated sites. The proposed revision of the water policy introduces maximum concentrations for several PFAS[5].

    The EU Soil Observatory[6] works with EU laboratories and standardisation committees on a baseline for future PFAS monitoring in the EU and provides technical guidance to the Member States.

    The European Environment Agency maintains a database of examples of PFAS hotspots[7], tracking the presence and sources of PFAS in the environment, and their potential impacts on human health.

    The Commission actively supports research on PFAS in soils. Under the EU Mission ‘A Soil Deal for Europe’[8], two projects work on the identification of contaminants of emerging concern including PFAS[9]. SOILPROM[10] and PHISHES[11] m odel pollutant transport (including PFAS) across the soil-water-atmosphere interfaces. E-SPFdigit[12] focuses on novel on-site (soil, plant and food) digital services on chemical and biological contaminants including PFAS.

    Relevant Horizon Europe and Horizon 2020 projects focus on strategies for prevention and removal of persistent chemicals including PFAS[13], monitoring of emerging pollutants[14], detection, monitoring and remediation[15], and PFAS in the soil-sediment- water system[16]. More projects will also be funded on this issue[17]. Other EU programmes[18] also fund research on this topic. The Partnership for the Assessment of Risks from Chemicals[19] develops next-generation chemical risk assessments.

    • [1] Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC (Text with EEA relevance)Text with EEA relevance.
    • [2] Currently, a broad PFAS REACH restriction is under assessment. This was reflected in n a recent question from the European Parliament (EPQ-E-001152/2025).
    • [3] Some PFAS have a harmonised classification and labelling under the CLP Regulation. REGULATION (EU) 2024/2865 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 23 October 2024 amending Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures (Text with EEA relevance).
    • [4] Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on Soil Monitoring and Resilience (Soil Monitoring Law) COM/2023/416 final.
    • [5] Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL amending Directive 2000/60/EC establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy, Directive 2006/118/EC on the protection of groundwater against pollution and deterioration and Directive 2008/105/EC on environmental quality standards in the field of water policy (Text with EEA relevance) {SEC(2022) 540 final} — {SWD(2022) 540 final} — {SWD(2022) 543 final}.
    • [6] https://esdac.jrc.ec.europa.eu/euso.
    • [7] https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/european-zero-pollution-dashboards/indicators/pfas-contamination-and-soil-remediation-signal.
    • [8] https://mission-soil-platform.ec.europa.eu/.
    • [9] https://islandr-project.eu/, https://aragorn-horizon.eu/.
    • [10] https://soilprom.eu/.
    • [11] https://www.phishes-project.eu/.
    • [12] https://e-spfdigit.eu/.
    • [13] https://zeropm.eu/.
    • [14] https://www.biosensei.eu/.
    • [15] https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101037509.
    • [16] https://promisces.eu/.
    • [17] More specifically, Horizon Europe Cluster 6 Work Programme 2025 includes a call (HORIZON-CL6-2025-01-ZEROPOLLUTION-07) that aims, among other things, to monitor emerging pollutants (which could include PFAS) coming from the food and drink industries.
    • [18] such as Life Programme and Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions.
    • [19] https://www.eu-parc.eu/.
    Last updated: 2 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Increasing the adoption of artificial intelligence by public administrations in the EU – E-001509/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission adopted the AI (Artificial Intelligence) Continent Action Plan[1] and launched a public consultation[2] for the Apply AI strategy to identify key challenges for AI uptake in industrial sectors and public administration.

    The Commission’s efforts to support the digitalisation of public administrations include the network of European Digital Innovation Hubs (EDIHs)[3] that support municipalities and regions in their digital transformation. Starting in December 2025, EDIHs will become Experience Centres for AI, accelerating uptake of AI inter alia in public administration.

    Moreover, the Commission will support up to four pilot projects with a EUR 21 million budget to accelerate the deployment of generative AI solutions in public administrations.

    The Commission has also promoted the creation of a Data Space for Smart Communities[4] to allow local and regional administrations to share local data and use Local Digital Twins.

    The CitiVERSE[5] initiative facilitates city planning using Extended Reality tools. Moreover, the Alliance for Language Technologies project[6] federates Member States to address the shortages of language data for AI[7].

    • [1] https://commission.europa.eu/topics/eu-competitiveness/ai-continent_en.
    • [2] The consultation closes on 4 June 2025.
    • [3] https://european-digital-innovation-hubs.ec.europa.eu/home.
    • [4] https://www.ds4sscc.eu/.
    • [5] https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/factpages/citiverse.
    • [6] www.alt-edic.eu/about-us/.
    • [7] The ALT-EDIC projects co-financed by the DIGITAL programme include ALT-EDIC4EU (EUR 4M), LLMs4EU (EUR 40M), and OpenEuroLLM (40 Mio) to improve the European Language Technology Ecosystem, the collection of high-quality data and the development of multilingual LLMs.
    Last updated: 2 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Threat to the EU from the mafia of Türkiye and the Occupied Territories – E-001699/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission takes a comprehensive approach to protect the EU from financial crime. The anti-money laundering (AML/CFT) Directive[1] includes the obligation to identify third countries posing significant money laundering risks.

    The AML package adopted in 2024[2] further strengthen these efforts inter alia by establishing mechanisms to better identify and manage risks from third countries.

    The Commission engages in depth with candidate countries on topics related to organised crime, corruption and drug trafficking in the context of the negotiations on accession, which offers a direct and operational framework to engage with Türkiye.

    Risks stemming from Türkiye and in the non-government controlled areas of the Republic of Cyprus are part of these ongoing discussions with Türkiye.

    As a member of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), the Commission is fully aware of Türkiye’s compliance levels on AML/CFT, including its efforts to address any concerns through tangible actions, and of the risks associated with the non-government controlled areas as highlighted in the evaluation reports concerning Cyprus.

    While FATF removed Türkiye from its ‘grey list’ of countries in June 2024, the Commission agrees that close monitoring of the effectiveness of Türkiye’s AML/CFT framework is essential.

    In line with the EU methodology for identifying high risk third countries[3], as regards any candidate country, the Commission may consider mitigating measures included in the accession negotiations that address the identified strategic deficiencies.

    • [1] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2015/849/oj/eng.
    • [2] https://finance.ec.europa.eu/news/latest-update-anti-money-laundering-and-countering-financing-terrorism-legislative-package-2024-04-24_en.
    • [3] SWD(2020) 99: https://finance.ec.europa.eu/document/download/f745b6e8-735b-4855-b050-f52276356fe6_en?filename=200507-anti-money-laundering-terrorism-financing-action-plan-methodology_en.pdf.
    Last updated: 2 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Ongoing threats and persecution of Christians and other religious and ethnic communities in Syria – E-001399/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The EU continues to call for an end to violence across Syria and urges all parties to protect all Syrians without discrimination. In its regular contacts with the transitional authorities and local actors, the EU continues to advocate for a peaceful inclusive transition, guided by respect for international law, pluralism and non-discrimination .

    The EU particularly supports human rights and the principle of equality among all components of society and remains attentive to the actions of the transitional authorities and the way the transition develops.

    The EU was alarmed by the violent events in the coastal areas and strongly condemned the horrific sectarian crimes committed against civilians[1]. Accountability and transitional justice are key to lasting peace.

    The EU welcomed the establishment of an investigative committee a nd calls for all perpetrators of violence to be brought to justice in line with international law norms and standards.

    The EU has been and continues to be a staunch supporter of accountability mechanisms working on Syria, including the International, Impartial and Independent Mechanism, the United Nations Commission of Inquiry, and the Independent Institution on Missing Persons.

    The EU provides humanitarian assistance to all Syrian people in need, through pre-certified humanitarian partners in all parts of Syria, without discrimination.

    EU-funded humanitarian operations are based on people’s needs, humanitarian principles, and accountability to affected populations, emphasising transparency, efficiency and effectiveness.

    In response to the events on the coast, the Directorate-General for European Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid Operations delivered critical emergency assistance to affected populations through its humanitarian partners.

    • [1] https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2025/03/11/syria-statement-by-the-high-representative-on-behalf-of-the-european-union-on-the-recent-wave-of-violence/.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Implementation of the Migration Pact in the context of the Polish Government’s position – E-000547/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Asylum and Migration Management Regulation[1] foresees a mandatory but flexible solidarity mechanism, whereby each Member State has full discretion to choose between the available forms of solidarity, namely relocation, financial contributions and alternative measures (in-kind support).

    A reference key, based on the size of the population (50% weighting ) and of the gross domestic product of the Member States (50% weighting ), should be applied in accordance with the mandatory fair share principle for the operation of the solidarity mechanism enabling the determination of the overall contribution of each Member State.

    The Asylum and Migration Management Regulation also foresees possible deduction of solidarity contributions for Member States facing migratory pressure or a significant migratory situation.

    The Asylum and Migration Management Regulation also requires that e ach year, by 15 October, the Commission adopts an implementing decision determining whether a particular Member State is under migratory pressure, at risk of migratory pressure during the upcoming year, or facing a significant migratory situation.

    In doing so, the Commission will take into account qualitative and quantitative indicators, in accordance with Articles 9 and 10 of the regulation, including the number of beneficiaries of temporary protection in a given Member State. M ilitary assistance provided to Ukraine is not among the indicators set by the regulation.

    • [1] Regulation (EU) 2024/1351 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 May 2024 on asylum and migration management, amending Regulations (EU) 2021/1147 and (EU) 2021/1060 and repealing Regulation (EU) No 604/2013; OJ L, 2024/1351, 22.5.2024.
    Last updated: 2 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Aviation safety and reporting systems – E-001567/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission confirms that there is an ECCAIRS category for these types of occurrences under event type ‘Near Airborne Collision with Other Airborne Object’.

    Therefore, flight crews can fulfill the mandatory reporting obligations on any interference with the aircraft by any airborne object that could endanger the operation of the aircraft, as set out in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1018[1].

    The reporting of any other Unidentified Aerial Phenomena, which does not constitute a risk in terms of a potential airborne collision, can be reported under the provisions of the voluntary reporting systems established pursuant to Article 5 of Regulation (EU) No 376/2014[2] of the European Parliament and of the Council on the reporting, analysis and follow-up of occurrences in civil aviation.

    • [1] Articles 5(1) and (8) of Annex I, and Articles 1(1) and 3(3) of Annex III to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1018 of 29 June 2015 laying down a list classifying occurrences in civil aviation to be mandatorily reported according to Regulation (EU) No 376/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council, OJ L 163, 30.6.2015, p. 1-17; ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_impl/2015/1018/oj.
    • [2] Regulation (EU) No 376/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 on the reporting, analysis and follow-up of occurrences in civil aviation, amending Regulation (EU) No 996/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Directive 2003/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Commission Regulations (EC) No 1321/2007 and (EC) No 1330/2007, OJ L 122, 24.4.2014, p. 18; ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2014/376/2018-09-11.
    Last updated: 2 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Use of the Signal platform in diplomatic communications – E-001740/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The High Representative/Vice-President, Members of her Cabinet and members of staff may use instant messaging tools on their corporate devices for informal communication purposes.

    A data protection impact assessment is required only if there is a high risk to the rights and freedoms of natural persons in accordance with Article 39(1) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725[1]. This is not the case when Signal is used, given that the scope of personal information shared via Signal is limited.

    The European External Action Service and the Commission have already issued guidelines on the use of instant messaging and group chat tools.

    Use of publicly available non-corporate tools is limited to the exceptional cases when corporate solutions cannot be used. The guidelines stipulate that only non-confidential information should be shared and discussed when using, for example, Signal.

    • [1] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2018/1725/oj/eng.
    Last updated: 2 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Impact of the Trump administration’s decision to impose tariffs on European goods: impact on the Galician automotive sector – E-001311/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Industrial Action Plan for the European automotive sector recognises the challenges of an increasingly volatile geopolitical context and their potential impact on the EU automotive sector.

    Therefore, the Commission has committed on decisive actions to help secure global competitiveness of the EU automotive value chain and maintain a strong European production base.

    In line with the Automotive Action Plan, the Commission has proposed already an amendment to the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for Displaced Workers Regulation[1], which will extend the support to workers in companies in restructuring processes.

    In addition, the mid-term review of the European Social Fund Plus (ESF+)[2] will be used to incentivise Member States to reprogramme more money for the automotive sector.

    Trade with the United States represents a source of prosperity and well-paying and quality jobs for the EU automotive value chain. The Commission is assessing the impact of the United States tariffs on EU automotive exports and will also monitor the indirect effects.

    The Commission will continue to seek a negotiated and constructive solution with the United States, while being ready to protect European interests.

    • [1]  COM(2025) 140.
    • [2] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:02021R1057-20241224.
    Last updated: 2 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – The use of diesel particulate filters by consumers and businesses in small EU Member States – E-001368/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The stringency of the Euro standards pushed most advanced filter technologies to be commonly used for diesel vehicles[1]. To ensure continued performance of diesel particulate filters (DPFs), regeneration strategies are incorporated in vehicles with DPFs.

    Filter regeneration cleans the DPF by temporarily increasing exhaust temperatures to burn accumulated soot. While highway driving provides optimal conditions, regeneration can also be triggered during short-distance trips.

    All vehicles, including those circulating mostly in urban conditions, can therefore provide a good level of environmental protection throughout their lifetime, as required by the roadworthiness regulations.

    Current vehicle emission regulations[2] have been developed to reflect real-world driving conditions, including short-distance trips. Such short trips are common all across the EU, particularly in cities, considering that approximately 50% of urban car trips are shorter than 6 km[3]. Urban conditions play important role in the determination of real-driving emissions[4].

    Directive (EU) 2024/1799[5] on common rules promoting the repair of goods aims at incentivising consumers to repair their defective goods and imposes an obligation on manufacturers of certain goods to offer repair services at a reasonable price.

    However, the problem at hand concerns the maintenance, i.e., activities to keep the DPFs in a condition where they are able to fulfil their intended purpose which are outside the scope of the directive.

    • [1] See particle numbers (‘PN’) and particle matters (‘PM’) limits requirements in Euro 5 and Euro 6 standards (Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2007 on type approval of motor vehicles with respect to emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 5 and Euro 6) and on access to vehicle repair and maintenance information — http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2007/715/oj) and in Euro 7 standards (Regulation (EU) 2024/1257 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 April 2024 on type-approval of motor vehicles and engines and of systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles, with respect to their emissions and battery durability (Euro 7) — http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1257/oj).
    • [2] Particularly above-mentioned Euro 6 Regulation and Euro 7 Regulation.
    • [3] Vlachos, T., Bonnel, P., Weiss, M., Paffumi, E., Clairotte, M. et al., Including cold-start emissions in the Real-Driving Emissions (RDE) test procedure: An assessment of cold-start frequencies and emission effects, Publications Office, 2017, https://doi.org/10.2760/70237.
    • [4] See Annex IIIA to Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/1151 of 1 June 2017 supplementing Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council on type-approval of motor vehicles with respect to emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 5 and Euro 6) and on access to vehicle repair and maintenance information.
    • [5] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=OJ:L_202401799.
    Last updated: 2 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Latest news – Next Meeting of the D-MX Delegation: 9 July 2025 – Delegation to the EU-Mexico Joint Parliamentary Committee

    Source: European Parliament

    The next meeting of the Delegation to the EU-Mexico Joint Parliamentary Committee (D-MX) is scheduled for:

    Wednesday, 9 July 2025, 17.30-19.00

    Room: WEISS S4.5 (Strasbourg)

    The main item on the agenda is an “Exchange of views on the cooperation in fighting against transnational crime and drug trafficking”.

    Please note that this meeting will not be webstreamed due to limited resources.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Latest news – Next Meeting of the D-MX Delegation: 9 July 2025 – Delegation to the EU-Mexico Joint Parliamentary Committee

    Source: European Parliament

    The next meeting of the Delegation to the EU-Mexico Joint Parliamentary Committee (D-MX) is scheduled for:

    Wednesday, 9 July 2025, 17.30-19.00

    Room: WEISS S4.5 (Strasbourg)

    The main item on the agenda is an “Exchange of views on the cooperation in fighting against transnational crime and drug trafficking”.

    Please note that this meeting will not be webstreamed due to limited resources.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – High wage inequalities in the European Union – E-002555/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002555/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Galato Alexandraki (ECR)

    Despite the European Union’s principle of convergence, average wages still vary enormously between the Member States. According to recent data from 2023, the average monthly full-time wage in the EU was around EUR 3 155, dropping to less than EUR 1 125 in Bulgaria and reaching EUR 6 755 in Luxembourg. And although these disparities become narrower when purchasing power standards (PPS) are taken into account, significant inequalities persist. Low wages in many Eastern and Southern European countries, such as Greece, limit people’s ability to make a decent living and increase brain drain. While the EU has adopted the Minimum Wages Directive, it is unclear whether there are effective tools to ensure real convergence of incomes in terms of quality of life. This issue directly concerns social cohesion and the sustainability of economies.

    In view of the above, can the Commission say:

    • 1.Is there a plan to reduce disparities in average wages between Member States, not only in absolute terms but also taking into account purchasing power standards (PPS)?
    • 2.Does it envisage further regulatory action or financial support so that the wages in the countries with the lowest salaries can actually approach the European average in real terms?

    Submitted: 25.6.2025

    Last updated: 2 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – High wage inequalities in the European Union – E-002555/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002555/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Galato Alexandraki (ECR)

    Despite the European Union’s principle of convergence, average wages still vary enormously between the Member States. According to recent data from 2023, the average monthly full-time wage in the EU was around EUR 3 155, dropping to less than EUR 1 125 in Bulgaria and reaching EUR 6 755 in Luxembourg. And although these disparities become narrower when purchasing power standards (PPS) are taken into account, significant inequalities persist. Low wages in many Eastern and Southern European countries, such as Greece, limit people’s ability to make a decent living and increase brain drain. While the EU has adopted the Minimum Wages Directive, it is unclear whether there are effective tools to ensure real convergence of incomes in terms of quality of life. This issue directly concerns social cohesion and the sustainability of economies.

    In view of the above, can the Commission say:

    • 1.Is there a plan to reduce disparities in average wages between Member States, not only in absolute terms but also taking into account purchasing power standards (PPS)?
    • 2.Does it envisage further regulatory action or financial support so that the wages in the countries with the lowest salaries can actually approach the European average in real terms?

    Submitted: 25.6.2025

    Last updated: 2 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: RECOMMENDATION FOR A DECISION to raise no objections to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/530 of 12 June 2025 as regards its date of application – B10-0302/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    B10‑0302/2025

    Draft European Parliament decision to raise no objections to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/530 of 12 June 2025 as regards its date of application

    (C(2025)03819 – 2025/2766(DEA))

    The European Parliament,

     having regard to the Commission delegated regulation (C(2025)03819),

     having regard to the Commission’s letter of 6 June 2025 asking Parliament to declare that it will raise no objections to the delegated regulation,

     having regard to the letter from the Committee on International Trade to the Chair of the Conference of Committee Chairs of 25 June 2025,

     having regard to Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

     having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2173/2005 of 20 December 2005 on the establishment of a FLEGT licensing scheme for imports of timber into the European Community[1], and in particular Article 10(1) and (3) and Article 11a(5) thereof,

     having regard to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/530[2],

     having regard to Rule 114(6) of its Rules of Procedure,

     having regard to the recommendation for a decision of the Committee on International Trade,

    A. whereas Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/530 includes the Republic of Ghana and its Timber Industry Development Division in the list in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 2173/2005, and the list of products covered by the Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade (FLEGT) licensing scheme in Annex III to that Regulation; whereas the trade in timber between the Union and Ghana is regulated by Voluntary Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Ghana on forest law enforcement, governance and trade in timber products into the Community (Agreement)[3]; whereas Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/530 is to apply from 8 July 2025;

    B. whereas preparations for issuing FLEGT licences are taking longer than expected and Ghana will start issuing FLEGT licences on 30 June 2025 at the earliest; whereas shipments from Ghana take between two and eight weeks to reach the Union, causing a risk that shipments leaving Ghana before 30 June 2025 but reaching the Union after 8 July 2025 will not be accompanied by a FLEGT licence and will thus not be able to enter the Union;

    C. whereas there is a significant risk that timber shipments arriving in the Union as from 8 July 2025 may not be covered by a FLEGT licence as they may have been shipped before Ghana starts issuing FLEGT licences; whereas this could generate trade disruption, undermine the credibility of the Agreement as a trade facilitating instrument and have a negative impact on economic operators both in Ghana and in the Union;

    D. whereas the date from which Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/530 applies should be adapted, in order to allow sufficient time for shipments leaving Ghana before 30 June 2025 to reach the Union without the obligation to be covered by a FLEGT licence;

    E. whereas Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/530 should therefore be amended accordingly;

    1. Declares that it has no objections to the delegated regulation;

    2. Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and the Commission.

     

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: RECOMMENDATION FOR A DECISION to raise no objections to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/530 of 12 June 2025 as regards its date of application – B10-0302/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    B10‑0302/2025

    Draft European Parliament decision to raise no objections to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/530 of 12 June 2025 as regards its date of application

    (C(2025)03819 – 2025/2766(DEA))

    The European Parliament,

     having regard to the Commission delegated regulation (C(2025)03819),

     having regard to the Commission’s letter of 6 June 2025 asking Parliament to declare that it will raise no objections to the delegated regulation,

     having regard to the letter from the Committee on International Trade to the Chair of the Conference of Committee Chairs of 25 June 2025,

     having regard to Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

     having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2173/2005 of 20 December 2005 on the establishment of a FLEGT licensing scheme for imports of timber into the European Community[1], and in particular Article 10(1) and (3) and Article 11a(5) thereof,

     having regard to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/530[2],

     having regard to Rule 114(6) of its Rules of Procedure,

     having regard to the recommendation for a decision of the Committee on International Trade,

    A. whereas Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/530 includes the Republic of Ghana and its Timber Industry Development Division in the list in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 2173/2005, and the list of products covered by the Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade (FLEGT) licensing scheme in Annex III to that Regulation; whereas the trade in timber between the Union and Ghana is regulated by Voluntary Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Ghana on forest law enforcement, governance and trade in timber products into the Community (Agreement)[3]; whereas Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/530 is to apply from 8 July 2025;

    B. whereas preparations for issuing FLEGT licences are taking longer than expected and Ghana will start issuing FLEGT licences on 30 June 2025 at the earliest; whereas shipments from Ghana take between two and eight weeks to reach the Union, causing a risk that shipments leaving Ghana before 30 June 2025 but reaching the Union after 8 July 2025 will not be accompanied by a FLEGT licence and will thus not be able to enter the Union;

    C. whereas there is a significant risk that timber shipments arriving in the Union as from 8 July 2025 may not be covered by a FLEGT licence as they may have been shipped before Ghana starts issuing FLEGT licences; whereas this could generate trade disruption, undermine the credibility of the Agreement as a trade facilitating instrument and have a negative impact on economic operators both in Ghana and in the Union;

    D. whereas the date from which Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/530 applies should be adapted, in order to allow sufficient time for shipments leaving Ghana before 30 June 2025 to reach the Union without the obligation to be covered by a FLEGT licence;

    E. whereas Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/530 should therefore be amended accordingly;

    1. Declares that it has no objections to the delegated regulation;

    2. Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and the Commission.

     

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Combating the misuse of national symbols on food packaging – E-001805/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    1. Pursuant to Article 26(3) of Regulation No 1169/2011[1], where the country of origin or place of provenance of a food is given and it is not the same as that of its primary ingredient, the country of origin or place of provenance of the primary ingredient in question needs also to be declared or, at least, indicated as being different to that of the food.

    2. Article 26(3) first subparagraph of the regulation No 1169/2011 sets out conditions for the application of specific labelling requirements for primary ingredients. Where food business operators opt to only indicate the country of origin or place of provenance of the primary ingredient as being different to that of the food, for example because of multiple or variable supply sources and particular production processes, the rules stipulated by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/775[2] are to be followed. The relevant indication should ensure comprehensible information to the consumer.

    • [1] Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on the provision of food information to consumers, amending Regulations (EC) No 1924/2006 and (EC) No 1925/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and repealing Commission Directive 87/250/EEC, Council Directive 90/496/EEC, Commission Directive 1999/10/EC, Directive 2000/13/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, Commission Directives 2002/67/EC and 2008/5/EC and Commission Regulation (EC) No 608/2004 OJ L 304, 22.11.2011, p. 18-63.
    • [2] Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/775 of 28 May 2018 laying down rules for the application of Article 26(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the provision of food information to consumers, as regards the rules for indicating the country of origin or place of provenance of the primary ingredient of a food OJ L 131, 29.5.2018, p. 8-11.
    Last updated: 2 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Combating the misuse of national symbols on food packaging – E-001805/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    1. Pursuant to Article 26(3) of Regulation No 1169/2011[1], where the country of origin or place of provenance of a food is given and it is not the same as that of its primary ingredient, the country of origin or place of provenance of the primary ingredient in question needs also to be declared or, at least, indicated as being different to that of the food.

    2. Article 26(3) first subparagraph of the regulation No 1169/2011 sets out conditions for the application of specific labelling requirements for primary ingredients. Where food business operators opt to only indicate the country of origin or place of provenance of the primary ingredient as being different to that of the food, for example because of multiple or variable supply sources and particular production processes, the rules stipulated by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/775[2] are to be followed. The relevant indication should ensure comprehensible information to the consumer.

    • [1] Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on the provision of food information to consumers, amending Regulations (EC) No 1924/2006 and (EC) No 1925/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and repealing Commission Directive 87/250/EEC, Council Directive 90/496/EEC, Commission Directive 1999/10/EC, Directive 2000/13/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, Commission Directives 2002/67/EC and 2008/5/EC and Commission Regulation (EC) No 608/2004 OJ L 304, 22.11.2011, p. 18-63.
    • [2] Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/775 of 28 May 2018 laying down rules for the application of Article 26(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the provision of food information to consumers, as regards the rules for indicating the country of origin or place of provenance of the primary ingredient of a food OJ L 131, 29.5.2018, p. 8-11.
    Last updated: 2 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Africa: South Africa looks to global lessons as it sharpens its focus on gender priorities at G20

    Source: South Africa News Agency

    South Africa looks to global lessons as it sharpens its focus on gender priorities at G20

    As the G20 Technical Meetings continue in South Africa, a powerful voice is emerging from within the country’s leadership, calling for bolder and more targeted investments in women, youth, and persons with disabilities. 

    Advocate Joyce Mikateko Maluleke, the Chairperson of the G20 Empowerment Women Working Group (EWWG) and Director-General of the Department of Women, Youth and Persons with Disabilities, told SAnews that South Africa is drawing critical lessons from global partners to respond to some of its most urgent challenges.

    The Third Technical Meeting of the G20 EWWG is currently taking place at the Skukuza Conference Centre at the Kruger National Park in Mpumalanga.   

    “There’s a lot that, as a country, we are learning from other countries. We have three priorities: valuing the care economy – both paid and unpaid; unlocking genuine financial inclusion for women, and eradicating gender-based violence and femicide,” Maluleke said. 

    Maluleke began by addressing the crisis of gender-based violence and femicide (GBVF), which she said continues to tear through the country’s social fabric.

    “Gender-based violence is a crisis in South Africa. It’s really one thing that, as a country, we want to learn from other countries. Other countries have done so many things… for prevention, even regulating access to social media, because one of the biggest challenges is that our children have a lot of unlimited access to the internet at an early age. Other countries shared that they control what young persons have access to,” she explained.

    From controlling explicit media to implementing surveillance technologies that aid in prevention and justice, Maluleke said there is much to learn from. 

    “They have used technology to protect women. For example, you find that there’s a surveillance camera every few meters. It does help because they can follow up… They have invested in prevention,” she said. 

    Investing in strong family support structures, something other countries do well, is an area where South Africa must improve. Maluleke said this is one of the biggest prevention measures that the country needs to adopt.  

    On financial inclusion, Maluleke highlighted the need to replicate successful international models that empower women from the ground up.

    “We’ve learned from them… The support they give to women in businesses starts from their education systems. Countries like Germany have invested in vocational training, and they have elevated artisanship to the same level as those that went to university,” she said. 

    In Germany, Maluleke noted, 60% of learners pursue technical training, while only 40% go to university. 

    “That’s why Germany is so strong in terms of engineering and [technical fields],” she remarked.

    The third priority, which is care work, remains an often-overlooked economic force, Maluleke said.

    “Most countries have indicated that [care work] is a strong, unseen engine of the economy. Women will stay at home to raise children and to look after those who are sick…” she said, urging for an investment in systems that allow for a balance between work and life commitments.

    “Care work, they say, is work of love. Yes, we love our parents, but we must still be able to live,” Maluleke emphasised.

    On prevention strategies for GBVF, the Director-General stressed the urgent need to shift focus and budget accordingly.

    “… [UN Women] said: ‘Preventing gender-based violence is not expensive. Not preventing gender-based violence is expensive.” It costs [a lot to raise] children [whose] families… are not able to [take them] to school, who won’t be able to contribute to the GDP… and who [might] end up getting involved in substance abuse, and to rehabilitate them is expensive,” she said. 

    Towards a stronger declaration and legacy

    As deliberations continue, South Africa is preparing for the signing of a declaration that addresses its three focus areas, namely, care work, financial inclusion and GBVF. 

    Maluleke explained that every working group works on the technical meetings, which will culminate in the declaration that will be signed by Ministers in the G20 when they meet. 

    She emphasised that a key objective is to secure tangible outcomes from the G20 engagement.

    “One of the achievements that we would like to achieve is that the financial sector needs to ensure that when Ministers sign the declaration as a product… they also launch a legacy project,” she added. 

    Indeed, one such legacy project is already in the pipeline.

    “We already have the World Bank… The World Bank will be launching, as a legacy project of the South African G20 Presidency, a financial facility on care work.

    “Women, who are running ECDs [Early Childhood Development Centres], will be able to apply for funding from that fund. They will launch it at the Minister’s meeting,” Maluleke said. 

    Consensus and Positive Masculinity 

    With 21 countries now part of the G20, following the African Union’s recent inclusion, building consensus remains a major hurdle. 

    “All of them must consent to the declaration. That’s why we’re starting the negotiations today… and even tomorrow, we will be negotiating,” Maluleke said. 

    Alongside the declaration, South Africa is preparing another powerful intervention: a conference on positive masculinity.

    “Masculinity shouldn’t destroy. It should protect,” Maluleke said. 

    The event will bring together G20 countries, guest nations, and international organisations, aiming to change the mindset of men and reframe masculinity as a force for protection and empowerment.

    “There are countries that have reduced gender-based violence. They say gender-based violence can be prevented, but you have to invest in that prevention.

    “Gender-based violence doesn’t discriminate… All of us have to make sure that we prevent it so that we protect our girls,” the Director-General said. 

    As negotiations unfold and commitments solidify, South Africa is poised to drive meaningful change – not just at home but across the G20 platform by aligning global best practices with local action, and by ensuring no one is left behind in the fight for dignity, equity and justice. – SAnews.gov.za 

    DikelediM

    MIL OSI Africa

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Result of public consultation on local access guidance at Loch Ruthven

    Source: Scotland – Highland Council

    Feedback has been collated from a public consultation launched by The Highland Council that could help protect a rare species of bird at Loch Ruthven near Farr, south of Inverness.

    The entire UK breeding population of Slavonian Grebes is usually found in lochs within 30 miles of Inverness. The number of breeding pairs on the loch has declined from a long-term average of 13 to just 3 in 2024. The consultation was launched to develop local access guidance at Loch Ruthven that could help protect the birds during their breeding season.

    The consultation closed on 16 May with 239 people responding to the invitation for opinions and ideas on a proposal to ask people not to canoe, paddleboard or swim at the east end of the loch between 1 March and 31 August.

    Responses have shown considerable support for the proposal with 88% of respondents believing the idea to be reasonable and acceptable. Many qualified their support saying that research into the causes of the decline in Slavonian Grebes was needed, along with education and publicity about the birds’ plight.

    15 people said they would not agree to the guidance, with most concerned about how it might affect their rights to fish the loch. Those rights are private and will remain unaffected.

    Others who did not support the proposal felt that the case against swimmers, paddleboarders and canoeists was not proven and that more research was needed into the causes of the decline. They too felt that more education and information was needed for water sports enthusiasts visiting the loch.

    The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (Scotland) manages land at the east end of the loch with the help of a ranger and volunteers and will continue to monitor activity at the loch whilst helping people understand what is being asked of them and why. Proposals for a wider and more in-depth study into why Slavonian Grebes numbers are declining are also in the pipeline. These measures will be useful when determining if the local access guidance is effective in protecting the birds.

    With the majority of respondents backing the proposal – including clubs and organisations representing paddle sports – Highland Council will support the message asking people to avoid swimming, paddleboarding or canoeing at the east of the loch until the end of August 2025. The effectiveness of this local access guidance will be reviewed after the 2025 breeding season.

    2 Jul 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Community benefits funding delivers educational resources to Highland schools

    Source: Scotland – Highland Council

    Highland Council has provided 12 ‘Talking Tub’ resources for use in primary schools across the Highlands, in partnership with Union Technical who deliver community benefits as part of the Energy Efficient Scotland: Area Based Scheme programme.

    Chair of Highland Council’s Education Committee, Councillor John Finlayson, said: “This is a fantastic initiative being rolled out across Highland primary schools which brings innovation and inspiration to early years children. Talking Tubs are educational resources designed to be borrowed by early years providers to enhance learning around a particular topic or theme and these boxes focus on construction and green energy.

    “The goal is to help children begin developing the foundational skills and curiosity needed for future careers in energy and construction—sectors that are vital to the sustainability and growth of the Highlands. By using the Talking Tubs as a playful learning tool, educators can introduce children to a broader spectrum of jobs and skills beyond the traditional roles they may already see in their local areas. This initiative not only supports early learning and development but also strengthens community ties by highlighting local industries and the exciting possibilities they hold for the next generation.”

    Each tub is thoughtfully curated with a variety of engaging materials including wooden construction toys, Lego sets, house building bricks, engineering and construction children’s books, puzzles, hard hats and hi-vis vests, all aimed at encouraging children to explore real-world themes through imaginative play and providing awareness for future careers.  

    The Energy Efficient Scotland: Area Based Scheme (EES:ABS) programme is a Scottish Government programme and offers eligible Highland residents grant funding for energy efficiency measures including external wall insulation, cavity wall insulation, loft insulation, air source heat pump and solar panels with battery storage, which can result in significant savings on household energy bills.

    Managed locally by Highland Council, the scheme is currently delivered by Union Technical and has funded upgrades for thousands of homes across the Highlands using Government grants and other support.

    Highland Council receiving the Talking Tubs from Union Technical

    St Columbus Primary School receiving a Talking Tub

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Community invited to help shape Dingwall 800 celebrations

    Source: Scotland – Highland Council

    To mark 800 years since Dingwall became a Royal Burgh, a year-long programme of celebrations is being planned for 2026 and local residents, community groups and businesses are now being invited to get involved in shaping this major milestone for the Highland town.

    Fèis Rois, in partnership with The Highland Council, Dingwall Community Council, Dingwall Community Development Company, and other local organisations, is coordinating the Dingwall 800 programme, with a focus on “Telling Dingwall’s Story – Past, Present & Future.”

    Two public drop-in information sessions will be held in July for anyone interested in learning more, sharing ideas, or getting involved.

    These will be held at the Fèis Rois office in Robertson House, Dingwall on Monday 14th July from 6-8pm and Thursday 17th July from 2-4pm.

    All are welcome to attend.

    Fèis Rois, one of Scotland’s top traditional arts organisations and based in Dingwall, is particularly keen to hear from local groups, individuals, creatives and businesses interested in participating in or supporting the 2026 celebrations.

    As part of the preparations, a logo design competition is being launched for young people aged 8 to 25.

    The winning logo will represent the Dingwall 800 celebrations across all publicity materials.

    Young creatives are invited to create a logo inspired by Dingwall, its history, people, and future.

    Entries may be hand-drawn, painted, or created digitally. The deadline for entries is Sunday 31st August and you can find entry details at www.feisrois.org.

    The winning design will be used across all Dingwall 800 marketing materials and the winner will also receive a £300 voucher for Fèis Rois, which can be used for a year of weekly music classes or to attend a residential course.

    There will also be two runner-up prizes.

    Siobhan MacIntyre, the recently appointed Dingwall 800 Event Producer, commented: “This is an exciting opportunity for young people to contribute to a historic event and have their creativity recognised as part of a major community celebration.  I’m sure that come next year there won’t be a single person in Dingwall who doesn’t recognise the Dingwall 800 logo!”

    Siobhan, who took up her role in June in between working at Glastonbury Festival where she has worked as part of the producing team for over a decade, is from the Highlands and is a graduate of the Royal Conservatoire of Scotland in Technical and Production Arts Management.

    As well as Glastonbury, she has worked across the UK and internationally on large-scale arena tours including Catherine Tate, Strictly: The Professionals, and Steve Backshall Live.

    Siobhan added: “I’m excited to contribute to Fèis Rois, the community of Dingwall, and be part of celebrating and supporting Scotland’s rich cultural heritage”

    Highland Council’s Dingwall and Seaforth Area Committee Chair, Cllr Graham MacKenzie, said: “We are delighted to welcome Siobhan to the new post of events producer as we prepare to celebrate the 800th anniversary of Dingwall becoming a Royal Burgh.

    “In May the Dingwall and Seaforth Committee of Highland Council agreed to allocate funds to Fèis Rois to help recruit Siobhan. She has an impressive career background in high-quality cultural and arts events, and will now lead on the delivery of an ambitious and exciting programme of work to mark this special milestone.”

    2026 promises to be a major year for the town and surrounding area. Dingwall 800 events will help drive tourism and boost economic growth, as well as to deliver other priorities previously identified in our area-based plan.”

    To find out more about the drop-in sessions or logo competition, please visit www.feisrois.org.

    PR issued by Katie MacKenzie PR

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Community-Led Local Development Fund distributes over £900k to support projects in Highland

    Source: Scotland – Highland Council

    The Highland Strategic Local Action Group (LAG) met in June 2025 and considered and agreed funding for 28 projects submitted to the Community-Led Local Development fund (CLLD), which makes up part of The Highland Council Community Regeneration Fund (CRF) programme.

    CRF is an umbrella term used to cover multiple external funding programmes administered by The Highland Council.  Decisions on which projects are to receive CLLD funding are taken by the Highland Strategic Local Action Group. This decision-making group is made up of third sector representatives, public agencies, and private organisations.    

    Chair of The Highland Council’s Economy and Infrastructure Committee, Councillor Ken Gowans, said: “It is the fourth year in a row that we have been successful in securing a large allocation of CLLD funding from the Scottish Government. This funding is essential to support grass roots economic regeneration, allowing communities to grow and develop new opportunities.”

    “We welcome the continued investment by the Scottish Government in our  rural communities and are proud to support community groups and witness the significant and lasting impact these projects have across the Highlands.

    “I wish everyone working hard to turn their plans into reality all the very best.”

    The CLLD Fund continues to play a vital role in supporting grassroots initiatives that foster resilience, inclusivity, and innovation in rural communities. From Caithness down to Lochaber, the funding will empower local groups and organisations to deliver impactful projects tailored to the unique needs of their communities. These include feasibility studies, building renovations, renewable energy installations, youth services, and community transport programmes.

    This follows on from a successful 2024/25 CLLD round where over £1.4 million was allocated to 52 community groups across the Highlands. Across Highland, the overall social return on investment for the 2024/25 CLLD round was £3.46 for every £1 of funding invested. In total projects spent returned a social value of £6,065,874. 

    CLLD 2025-26 approved projects:

    The Dornoch Area Community Interest Company: The Dornoch Community Transport Project –  £36,861.00 
    Lochview Rural Training Centre: Land Based Training Equipment – £12,954.00 
    Fearn Amenities SCIO : Groundworks At Fearn Pavillion  – £14,685.00 
    Edinbane Community Company:  Edinbane Shop Technical Design –  £15,000.00 
    Linnhe Leisure:  Sound & Lighting  –  £83,331.97 
    Lochaber Hope:  New Connections  –  £11,439.52 
    Poolewe and District Swimming Pool association: Sustain the Pool  –  £21,000.00 
    Wick Community Hub:  Sensory Room Space –  £30,000.00 
    Farmer Jones Academy c.i.c : Sensory Dome and Play Equipment –  £57,000.00 
    Rosemarkie Amenities Association (RAA): Upgrading of Rosemarkie Promenade – £35,357.00 
    Dornie & District Community Trust:  Dornie Hub – £31,329.84 
    Mallaig & Morar Community Centre Association: Energy Efficiency Improvements – £2,961.99
    Arisaig Community Trust:  Playpark Project –  £22,343.32 
    Evanton Community Cinema:Equipment Purchase and Installation – £32,201.20 
    Wick Development Trust: Path Upgrade & Motorhome Waste Service – £52,329.24 
    Mallaig Pool & Leisure: Upgrade of Gym and Sauna – £100,000.00 
    Dementia Friendly Communities Ltd: Dinner To Your Door Delivery Vehicle – £27,279.00 
    Ormlie Community Association Ltd: New Meeting Room & Services –  £6,694.00 
    North Kessock Village Hall: North Kessock Village Hall Renovation –  £17,000.00 
    Isle of Eigg Heritage Trust:  New Signage and Trails  –   £9,945.00 
    Isle of Eigg Heritage Trust: Net Zero Housing – Phase 2 (NZH-2) – £76,596.00 
    Go Golspie Development Trust: New Electric Community Car – £34,369.00 
    Farr North Community Development Trust: Community Transport – Farr Goes –  £17,664.00 
    Glenelg and Arnisdale Development Trust: Glenelg Playpark – £27,077.00 
    Fox & Friends Highland: Disabled Friendly Bathroom –  £38,000.00
    Sutherland Resilience Initiative: Community Transport – £57,260.00
    Applecross Community Company:  Affordable Housing Project –  £44,600.00 
    The Place Youth Club:  Disabled Access Project  –  £50,000.00 

     

     

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: Remarks by Secretary for Health at media session

    Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region – 4

    Following are the remarks made by the Secretary for Health, Professor Lo Chung-mau; the Under Secretary for Health, Dr Libby Lee; and the Under Secretary for Health (designate), Dr Cecilia Fan, at a media session at the Central Government Offices today (July 2):
     
    Reporter: For Dr Lo, what are your thoughts on having Dr Fan on your team and seeing your current Under Secretary now leading the Hospital Authority? For Dr Fan, what specific reforms you envision in your new role as the Under Secretary for Health? And for Dr Lee, why did you decide to take on the role as Chief Executive of the Hospital Authority, and what goals and ideas you have in mind for your new position? 
     
    Secretary for Health: In brief, the whole move this time, regarding the three new appointments, is that we have reorganised the team of the whole health family in Hong Kong, not just for the Health Bureau and the Hospital Authority, but also for the primary healthcare as well as the Department of Health. We will be having a much stronger team, more co-ordinated to push forward the healthcare reforms that we are planning. We are confident that we will be able to achieve for the better health for Hong Kong. Thank you.
     
    Under Secretary for Health (designate): I would echo with Professor Lo that, for this healthcare reform, we are going to have concerted efforts from all parties as well as everybody, so I think this is important.
     
    Under Secretary for Health: In my previous days in the Hospital Authority, I was always proud – proud of being able to deliver public healthcare services to the public, proud to do research, and proud to teach the next generation for our healthcare profession. If I am given the opportunity, I am very eager and honoured to go and serve. For my vision, I really want the Hospital Authority to be an authority with warmth, and can build trust to the public, the staff and also the citizens, so we would actually drive in that direction. Thank you.
     
    (Please also refer to the Chinese portion of the remarks.)

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: LCQ21: Controlling expenditure on public works projects

    Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

    ​Following is a question by the Hon Chan Siu-hung and a written reply by the Secretary for Development, Ms Bernadette Linn, in the Legislative Council today (July 2):

    Question:

    It is learnt that public works expenditures involving infrastructure, healthcare, education, housing, and so on account for a substantial proportion of government spending. However, there are views pointing out that the model of division of labour in which policy bureaux or government departments, as “users”, only need to specify the requirements and functions during the planning stage of a project, leaving the subsequent processes such as design and construction to be spearheaded by technical departments like the Civil Engineering and Development Department or the Architectural Services Department, is prone to result in user departments lacking awareness of project budget control and losing sight of cost-effectiveness, whereas the technical departments may need to adopt more costly building designs, methods, or materials, among others, in a bid to meet the individual requirements of user departments, hence driving up the cost of works even at the inception stage (i.e. the “upstream stage”) of the project. Therefore, various government departments should shift their mindset towards upholding an “awareness of being property owners” to take the lead in formulating a reasonable budget right at the early stage of project planning and strictly monitor its implementation. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:

    (1) whether it will consider strengthening various government departments’ awareness of being property owners, with a view to exercising stringent control over the estimates of expenditure at the upstream stage of public works projects; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that;

    (2) of the strategies and specific measures implemented by the Project Strategy and Governance Office under the Development Bureau at various stages (including upstream, midstream and downstream) of public works to reduce project cost; whether an assessment has been conducted on the respective effectiveness of these strategies and measures; and

    (3) whether it has drawn on the cost control measures adopted by the Mainland and various places in the world at the upstream stage of public works; if not, of the reasons for that; if so, the details, including whether such measures encompass a concept similar to the awareness of being property owners?

    Reply:

    President,

    The Development Bureau (DEVB) established the Project Cost Management Office in 2016 and upgraded it to become the Project Strategy and Governance Office (PSGO) in April 2019 for formulating and implementing strategic initiatives and enhancing capabilities in cost surveillance and project governance to public works projects. On monitoring project estimates of public works, there is a set of stringent vetting mechanisms in place. While not compromising the functionality, quality and safety of works, the PSGO, as an independent third party, participates in project cost vetting from project inception stage in accordance with the “fitness-for-purpose and no frills” principle, and will follow up on project development and design optimisation and continuously monitor the performance of the projects during construction stage, and implement suitable measures for cost saving.

    Our responses to the three parts of the question are as follows:

    (1) At different project implementation stages, the works departments have been maintaining communication with the project proponent policy bureaux, providing advice to the project proponent policy bureaux on project planning and design, cost estimation, progress, etc. In addition, senior management of project proponent policy bureaux participated in the project management and leadership development programme under the Centre of Excellence for Major Project Leaders under​ the DEVB to reinforce and strengthen their understanding of project cost management and ensure that public funds are used properly. To further enhance capabilities in cost surveillance and project governance, the DEVB is working with the Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau to study on optimising the preparatory and conceptual work before project inception, with emphasis on strengthening the review of site selection, usage mix, scale, design, implementation programme, etc, by the project proponent policy bureaux and user departments. This will help the project proponent policy bureaux and user departments to comprehensively evaluate the cost-effectiveness of different implementation proposals with the “ownership” mindset, so as to formulate practical and cost-effective proposals. By planning ahead the overall estimates before project inception, the project cost-effectiveness can be further enhanced. We are currently formulating relevant details and guidelines, with the relevant measures planned to be implemented within this year.

    (2) The PSGO vigorously scrutinises cost estimates of public works projects. During the project inception stage, we also examine the technical feasibility statement submitted by the works departments to establish the technical feasibility of the project and review the preliminary cost estimate and cash flow requirements.

    During the design stage, we liaise with project proponent policy bureaux and user departments to enhance project cost-effectiveness, reduce cost and minimise risk of cost overrun through design optimisation by means of exploring different design options, construction methods and procurement models. We also carry out benchmarking with costs of other similar projects and make reference to the prevailing market situation, to ensure that the project estimates are reasonable. Furthermore, the Government adopts parallel tendering before submitting funding application of the projects to the Legislative Council so as to accurately reflect the tender prices in the approved project estimate for better financial management of the projects to reduce the risk of cost overrun.

    During the construction stage, the DEVB regularly conducts high-level meetings with works departments, complemented with the established Integrated Capital Works Platform, enabling management of different departments to grasp the real-time performance of each project, closely monitor the implementation programme of projects and provide timely intervention so as to mitigate the risks of project cost overrun and delays. At the same time, the PSGO also examines major variations in projects during the construction period and provides independent advice to works departments to ensure the cost-effectiveness of the major variations.

    Since its establishment, the PSGO has scrutinised more than 540 capital works projects, and successfully saved about $190 billion (about 16 per cent) in construction cost out of the original estimate of about $1,200 billion proposed by the project proponent policy bureaux.

    In addition, the overall cost management performance of the Capital Works Programme has all along been well performed. In the past ten years, there were 575 Category A projects approved by the Finance Committee of the Legislative Council, and so far only 15 projects required budget increase. Besides, in the past ten years, the total expenditure of the 510 Category A projects with their final accounts settled (including expenditure of the additional funding) was about 90 per cent of the total original approved project estimates.

    The DEVB has completed the strategic study on relatively high construction costs in Hong Kong. We will progressively launch the relevant cost control measures along the following four directions, which includes (i) optimising the project procurement model, (ii) reviewing the design standards and requirements, (iii) applying advanced technologies and construction methods, and (iv) streamlining the approval process, once they are ready so as to reduce the construction costs.

    (3) The Government has been liaising and actively exchanging project management experience with other authorities, including the Mainland, Singapore and the United Kingdom, to enhance the project delivery capabilities and performance. For example, the DEVB signed the Letter of Intent on Strengthening Guangdong-Hong Kong Cooperation in Construction and Related Engineering Sectors with the Department of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of Guangdong Province to deepen the co-operation in construction and engineering sectors between Guangdong and Hong Kong. We also signed a Memorandum of Understanding each with the Centre for Public Project Management of the Ministry of Finance of Singapore and the Infrastructure and Projects Authority, part of the Cabinet Office and HM Treasury of the United Kingdom, in December 2022 and February 2023 respectively. The DEVB also organised the Project Cost Management Forum to allow local and overseas industry leaders to exchange views and share experiences regarding project cost control. Among them, we make reference to the process and experience of implementing projects in the Mainland, as well as their practices for optimising construction programme. In addition, we understand that the Singapore government is involved in the upstream process of project planning to review the scope, design and cost reasonableness of the projects, and enhance the cost-effectiveness of the projects by revising the scope of the projects or optimising the design. We will continue to make reference to the experience of project cost control in different places and formulate comprehensive and systematic measures to manage project costs.

    Ends/Wednesday, July 2, 2025
    Issued at HKT 19:26

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News