Category: AM-NC

  • MIL-OSI USA: Tuning a NASA Instrument: Calibrating MASTER

    Source: NASA

    NASA’s Ames Research Center in Silicon Valley houses a unique laboratory: the Airborne Sensor Facility (ASF). The engineers at the ASF are responsible for building, maintaining, and operating numerous instruments that get deployed on research aircraft, but one of their most important roles is instrument calibration.
    Think of calibration like tuning a piano between performances: A musician uses a tuner to set the standard pitch for each string, ensuring that the piano remains on pitch for every concert.
    The “tuners” at ASF include lasers, mirrors, and a light source called an integrating sphere – a hollow sphere about 36 inches in diameter that emits a set amount of light from a hole in the top. By checking an instrument against this baseline between each mission, engineers ensure that the instrument sensors provide accurate, reliable data every time.
    In the photo above, electrical engineer Nikolas Gibson performs calibration tests on the MODIS/ASTER Airborne Simulator (MASTER) spectrometer, co-developed by NASA Ames and NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Southern California.
    A spectrometer separates light into individual wavelengths, providing researchers with information about the properties of whatever is creating or interacting with that light. The MASTER instrument measures about 50 individual spectral channels, providing data on wavelengths from the visible spectrum through the infrared.
    When it comes to calibration, each of these channels functions like a specific key on a piano and needs to be individually checked against the “tuner.” By pointing the instrument’s sensor at a known quantity of light coming from the integrating sphere, the team checks the accuracy of MASTER’s data output and repairs or adjusts the sensor as needed.
    In this image, MASTER had returned from an April 2025 scientific campaign observing  prescribed fires in Alabama and Georgia with NASA’s FireSense project. It was recalibrated before heading back into the field for the Geological Earth Mapping Experiment, or GEMx,  mission in late May 2025, which will use the instrument to help map critical minerals across the southwestern United States.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: FEMA Fire Management Assistance Grant Approved for Marie Fire

    Source: US Federal Emergency Management Agency

    Headline: FEMA Fire Management Assistance Grant Approved for Marie Fire

    FEMA Fire Management Assistance Grant Approved for Marie Fire

    OAKLAND, Calif

     – The Federal Emergency Management Agency’s (FEMA) Region 9 Administrator authorized the use of federal funds to assist the State of Nevada in combating the Marie Fire burning in Washoe County

    On June 10, the State of Nevada submitted a request for a Fire Management Assistance Grant (FMAG) declaration for the Marie Fire

     At the time of the request, the fire was threatening approximately 500+ homes in and around Sun Valley and Spanish Spring

    Mandatory evacuations were taking place for approximately 2,000 people

    The fire started on June 10 and has burned more than 70 acres

     FMAGs provide federal funding for up to 75 percent of eligible firefighting costs

     The Disaster Relief Fund provides allowances for FMAGs through FEMA to assist in fighting fires that threaten to become major incidents

    Eligible costs covered by FMAGs can include expenses for field camps, equipment use, materials, supplies and mobilization, and demobilization activities attributed to fighting the fire

    For more information on FMAGs, visit fema

    gov/assistance/public/fire-management-assistance

    eileen

    chao
    Wed, 06/11/2025 – 15:48

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Berrien County Residents Invited to Review Flood Maps

    Source: US Federal Emergency Management Agency

    Headline: Berrien County Residents Invited to Review Flood Maps

    Berrien County Residents Invited to Review Flood Maps

    CHICAGO –Preliminary flood risk information and updated Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) are available for review by residents and business owners in Berrien County, Michigan

    Property owners are encouraged to review the latest information to learn about local flood risks and potential future flood insurance requirements

    Community stakeholders can identify any concerns or questions about the information provided and participate in the 90-day appeal and comment period

    The 90-day appeal period began on June 6, 2025

    The preliminary maps and changes from current maps may be viewed online at the FEMA Flood Map Changes Viewer: http://msc

    fema

    gov/fmcv

     The updated maps were produced in coordination with local, state and FEMA officials

    Significant community review of the maps has already taken place, but before the maps become final, community stakeholders can identify any concerns or questions about the information provided and submit appeals or comments

    Contact your local floodplain administrator to do so

     Appeals must include technical information, such as hydraulic or hydrologic data, to support the claim

    Appeals cannot be based on the effects of proposed projects or projects started after the study is in progress

    If property owners see incorrect information that does not change the flood hazard information, such as a missing or misspelled road name in the Special Flood Hazard Area or an incorrect corporate boundary, they can submit a written comment

     The next step in the mapping process is the resolution of all comments and appeals

    Once they are resolved, FEMA will notify communities of the effective date of the final maps

    For more information about the flood maps: Use a live chat service about flood maps at go

    usa

    gov/r6C (just click on the “Live Chat” icon during operating hours)

    Contact a FEMA Map Specialist by telephone toll-free at 1-877-FEMA-MAP (1-877-336-2627) or by email at FEMA-FMIX@fema

    dhs

    gov

       Most homeowner’s insurance policies do not cover flooding

    Learn more about your flood insurance options by talking with your insurance agent and visiting www

    FloodSmart

    gov

     For more information, contact the FEMA Mapping Team at FEMA-R5-MAP@fema

    dhs

    gov

    kimberly

    keblish
    Wed, 06/11/2025 – 15:12

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Fewer Feeds, More Focus: NASA’s Social Media Overhaul

    Source: NASA

    In today’s crowded digital landscape, cutting through the noise is paramount for any organization trying to connect with its audience. Recognizing this, NASA has embarked on a significant initiative to streamline its extensive social media presence, aiming to create a more unified and impactful digital voice for its groundbreaking work. 
    The National Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958 tasked NASA with providing the “widest practicable and appropriate dissemination of information concerning its activities and the results thereof.” The 2025 social media consolidation project is designed to fulfill this mandate more effectively. By reducing the number of agency accounts, NASA seeks to make its work more accessible to the public, avoiding the potential for oversaturation or confusion that can arise from numerous social media accounts bearing the NASA name and insignia. 
    Over time, NASA’s social media footprint has expanded considerably, growing to over 400 individual accounts across 15 platforms. While this allowed for highly specialized updates, it also created a fragmented digital landscape that was challenging for both the public to navigate and for NASA to manage efficiently. 
    To ensure a more cohesive and impactful digital presence, the consolidation project involved a thorough evaluation of every existing account. Accounts were assessed based on several key considerations, including their compliance with federal and agency policies, their activity within the last year, their unique value proposition, their level of two-way engagement with the public, and their approach to publishing new, original content versus reposting existing material. 
    Based on this comprehensive evaluation, accounts will be handled in one of a few ways: 

    Deactivate/Sunset: Many accounts that publish content that can be effectively absorbed by broader channels will be sunset. This means they will cease active posting and eventually become inactive or removed from public view by the platform. 

    Merge: Content and followers from some specialized accounts will be merged into larger, thematic accounts or NASA’s flagship channels. This ensures valuable information still reaches the intended audience, but through fewer, more prominent feeds. 

    Rebrand: A small number of accounts may be rebranded to better align with the new strategic framework, reflecting a broader scope or a more direct connection to core NASA initiatives.   

    This initiative builds upon the success of previous digital transformation projects within the agency, such as the Science Mission Directorate’s social media consolidation project in 2019 and website modernization in 2023. Both efforts resulted in streamlined processes, modernized content, and more focused communications, and NASA anticipates similar positive outcomes from this current social media consolidation.   
    Ultimately, this strategic shift underscores a broader trend for NASA’s digital communication strategy: the move toward quality over quantity. For NASA, it’s about making vital information more accessible and digestible, ensuring the agency’s awe-inspiring work resonates deeply with a global audience. The future of space communication promises to be more focused, more powerful, and even more inspiring. 
    References: Blog posted by Dr. Z Statement on NASA’s social media directory Web, app, and NASA+ transformation  

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – The war on drugs – E-002297/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002297/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Loucas Fourlas (PPE)

    The spread of drugs, particularly among young people, remains one of the most important social threats in the European Union. New psychoactive substances are rapidly circulating on the market, often originating from non-EU countries, and are difficult to trace. At the same time, organised crime continues to use new trafficking methods, mainly using digital media and postal services.

    Given the consequences for health, safety and social cohesion:

    • 1.How does the Commission intend to strengthen the European early warning and information exchange mechanism on new substances?
    • 2.What financial instruments are available to Member States for prevention and rehabilitation, particularly in school and youth settings?
    • 3.Is there any intention to set up a pan-European information campaign on the dangers of drugs?

    Submitted: 6.6.2025

    Last updated: 11 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Foreign interference in Hungary and recommendations on the transparency of foreign-funded non-governmental organisations – P-002264/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Priority question for written answer  P-002264/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    András László (PfE)

    At the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs’ meeting of 4 June 2025, the Commission again failed to answer my questions. I therefore request answers to the following:

    • 1.Is the Commission aware of the foreign interference in the 2022 Hungarian parliamentary elections funded by the United States of America?
    • 2.In the context of foreign-funded political activism, what concrete measures does the Commission recommend the Member States take to ensure the transparency of foreign-funded non-governmental organisations, in line with what it considers to be European values?

    Submitted: 4.6.2025

    Last updated: 11 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – The use of Paragon Solutions spyware against journalists – E-000617/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission is aware of the recent reports on the use of Paragon. Its position on the use of spyware is very clear: any attempts to illegally access data of citizens, including journalists and political opponents, is unacceptable, if confirmed.

    The data protection and privacy acquis offers comprehensive protection to the confidentiality of communications and users’ personal data and terminal equipment. EU data protection law is applicable to the processing of personal data by private entities, even where such processing is required for national security purposes.

    Under the ePrivacy Directive[1], the interception or surveillance of communications is prohibited without the consent of the user. While restrictions are permitted for important public objectives, they are subject to strict conditions and safeguards.

    The Law Enforcement Directive[2] is also applicable when competent authorities process personal data for law enforcement purposes. Supervisory authorities have effective powers to examine any allegations of misuse, and data processed can be subject to judicial review.

    As regards the protection of journalistic sources and confidential information, the Commission recalls that Article 4(3)(c) of the European Media Freedom Act[3] (EMFA) will become applicable as of 8 August 2025.

    The application of this and other safeguards in EMFA will ensure free and independent media across the EU and protect them against interference. The Commission will use all tools at its disposal to ensure the effective application of EU law.

    • [1] Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2002 concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector (Directive on privacy and electronic communications), OJ L 201, 31.7.2002, p. 37.
    • [2] Directive (EU) 2016/680 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by competent authorities for the purposes of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties, and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Council Framework Decision 2008/977/JHA, OJ L 119, 4.
    • [3]  Regulation (EU) 2024/1083: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32024R1083. The provision stipulates that ‘Member States shall ensure that journalistic sources and confidential communications are effectively protected’ and that, subject to a strictly limited derogation, ‘Member States shall not deploy intrusive surveillance software on any material, digital device, machine or tool used by media service providers, their editorial staff or any persons who, because of their regular or professional relationship with a media service provider or its editorial staff, might have information related to or capable of identifying journalistic sources or confidential communications’.
    Last updated: 11 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Political representation of religious minorities in Iraq – E-000638/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The EU supports the different Iraqi institutions in strengthening democratic and inclusive governance, with the full participation of all components of the Iraqi society, including women and youth, as well as ethnic and religious minorities.

    The need to protect and improve the situation of minorities is raised regularly by the EU on its interactions with the authorities, notably in the ongoing electoral period ahead of the 11 November 2025 legislative elections.

    Most recently, this was also conveyed by the EU side at the recent 8th EU-Iraq Inter-Parliamentary meeting held on 14 May 2025 in Brussels.

    The EU supports, empowers and is in regular contact with Iraqi civil society organisations and human rights defenders as important components of the society. In recent weeks, the EU Delegation in Iraq has held conversations with Christian, Yazidi and Mandaean-Sabaean representatives from all across Iraq.

    These discussions revealed some degree of frustration about the current minority quota seats process not resulting in better representation.

    The concrete outcome of EU engagement with civil society representatives is to improve their capacity and political participation as well as understanding of the positions of the different communities to better tackle and raise their case when interacting with both the national and regional authorities.

    Last updated: 11 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Israeli demolitions of Palestinian homes in the Palestinian occupied West Bank – E-001332/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The EU reiterates its strong opposition to Israel’s settlement policy and actions taken in this context, including demolitions, forced displacement and settler violence.

    Widespread demolitions of Palestinian homes and structures by the Israeli authorities, coupled with a rapid expansion of settlements in the occupied West Bank through the advancement of a record number of housing units during 2025, are seriously undermining the viability of the two-state solution.

    The EU is gravely concerned that the occupation of the Palestinian territory that began in 1967 continues to this day, underlining in particular that the International Court of Justice has found that the continued presence of Israel in the occupied Palestinian territory is unlawful.

    The EU strongly condemns the demolitions of structures funded by the EU or its Member States and expects that Israel makes good the damage in accordance with international law[1].

    The EU is concerned about the escalating violence in the West Bank, with the ongoing Israeli military operation against armed militants leading to the destruction of large parts of refugee camps and the evacuation of some 40 000 Palestinians from their homes. The EU recalls the utmost importance of ensuring the protection of all civilians in military operations.

    The EU is committed to a just, comprehensive and lasting political resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict based on the two-state solution, with the State of Israel and an independent, democratic, contiguous, sovereign, and viable State of Palestine[2], living side by side in peace and security and mutual recognition, and with Jerusalem serving as the future capital of both states. The EU is engaging with both sides to achieve this goal.

    • [1] The EU’s position for the 13th EU-Israel Association Council -https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-6511-2025-INIT/en/pdf.
    • [2]  This designation shall not be construed as recognition of a State of Palestine and is without prejudice to the individual positions of the Member States on this issue.
    Last updated: 11 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Operation of Russian military helicopters in some EU Member States – E-001346/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission identified replacing post-Soviet legacy equipment as one of the most pressing challenges in the Joint Communication on the Defence Investment Gaps Analysis and Way Forward published on 18 May 2022[1] and initiated immediate actions to address it commonly in the spirit of solidarity proposing a regulation on establishing an instrument for the reinforcement of the European defence industry through common procurement[2].

    The programme proved to be successful and the Commission has proposed its follow-up through the European Defence Industry Programme[3], currently under consideration by the co-legislators.

    Moreover, the Commission proposed on 19 March 2025 a new regulation establishing the Security Action for Europe[4] that would be instrumental in addressing the replacement of Member States’ legacy equipment. It will provide Member States with loans up to EUR 150 billion to pursue their rearmament plans.

    To address the issue of replacing post-Soviet equipment in a longer-term perspective, the Commission supports research and development actions through the European Defence Fund[5].

    It supports the European Defence industry to provide Member States with new state of the art, innovative defence products and technologies.

    Decisions on the replacement of Russian helicopters and measures to ensure safety and security of their deployment are the responsibility of Member States, which remain obliged to comply with all the relevant restrictive measures (sanctions) in Council Decision (CFSP) 2014/512[6] and Council Regulation (EU) No 833/2014[7].

    • [1] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52022JC0024.
    • [2]  ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/2418/oj.
    • [3] https://defence-industry-space.ec.europa.eu/edip-proposal-regulation_en.
    • [4] https://defence-industry-space.ec.europa.eu/document/download/6d6f889c-e58d-4caa-8f3b-8b93154fe206_en?filename=SAFE%20Regulation.pdf.
    • [5] https://defence-industry-space.ec.europa.eu/eu-defence-industry/european-defence-fund-edf-official-webpage-european-commission_en.
    • [6] ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dec/2014/512/2025-02-25.
    • [7]  ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2014/833/2025-02-25.
    Last updated: 11 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – The Commission’s recent statement on the 28th regime and labour law – E-000673/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Competitiveness Compass announced the initiative on the 28th regime as one of the key measures to contribute to EU competitiveness and to make business easier and faster in Europe.

    The burden due to fragmentation of rules in different policy areas, including national corporate regimes , is proportionately greater for smaller companies, which have less financial and human resources. The diversity of national regimes also creates constraints for investors by increasing complexity and costs.

    This initiative will provide companies, in particular innovative ones, with a harmonised set of rules to make investing and operating in the single market easier.

    As a key element, it will set out a new corporate legal framework for companies. It will build further on existing solutions in EU acquis, in particular on fully online procedures and digital tools for companies in EU company law.

    This corporate legal framework will be complemented by targeted actions in other policy areas to help innovative companies, start-ups and scale-ups develop in the S ingle Market. Whether and what labour law elements could be included is to be determined.

    The initiative will be subject to an open public consultation where all interested parties can express their views. In addition, the 28th regime will be discussed in t he High-Level Forum on Justice for Growth.

    The Forum will be composed of representatives of all Member States, the European Parliament and stakeholders, including the main cross-industry organisations representing social partners at EU level. Further specific consultations would be considered, depending on the possible actions related to labour law.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Withdrawal of the Equal Treatment Directive – E-001151/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    As the Commission already pointed out in its answer to Written Question P -000962/2025 , in preparing the first work programme of the mandate, the Commission thoroughly assessed all proposals currently pending with the co-legislators.

    In its assessment, the Commission took into account whether proposals were actively being considered and agreement could be reached or, on the contrary, blocked for a very long time and/or without any real perspective of progress in the foreseeable future.

    As a result of this assessment, the Commission put forward a list of 37 proposals it intends to withdraw. This includes the proposal for a Council Directive on equal treatment[1] presented 17 years ago in 2008.

    The Commission has consistently supported the Council Presidencies and the Member States to help them in making progress towards the adoption of the Council Directive. While a majority of the Member States have indicated their support for the proposal, unanimity is required and does not seem likely to be reached.

    In line with the interinstitutional agreement on better law making[2], the Commission provided the reasons proposing the intended withdrawals in the Annex IV of the 2025 Commission work programme, together with a time indication[3].

    The Commission will take due account of the positions of the European Parliament and of the Council on the intended withdrawals before taking a decision.

    Building a Union of Equality remains a key priority for the Commission, as demonstrated by the recent adoption of the Roadmap for Women’s Rights[4] and the preparation of new strategies on lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex and queer equality, anti-racism and gender equality.

    • [1] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52008PC0426.
    • [2] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/agree_interinstit/2016/512/oj/eng.
    • [3] https://commission.europa.eu/document/download/7617998c-86e6-4a74-b33c-249e8a7938cd_en?filename=COM_2025_45_1_annexes_EN.pdf.
    • [4] https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_25_681.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Regulation EU 631/2019 – E-001345/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    Delivering on the EU’s climate targets[1] requires a swift decrease in greenhouse gas emissions from all sectors, including transport.

    The CO2 emission standards Regulation[2] sets targets to reduce emissions for new cars and vans, which creates long-term predictability for manufacturers and investors, while giving industry the necessary lead-time to adapt.

    This supports competitiveness, as EU manufacturers are strongly investing in zero-emission technologies and a strong home market is a crucial enabler for them to regain leadership in this area.

    From 2025, the limit value curve used for calculating car manufacturers’ specific targets has changed, taking into account recent developments in the relationship between the mass and CO2 emissions of new cars, including due to the increased uptake of battery electric vehicles.

    The CO2 targets apply to vehicles’ tailpipe emissions. This ensures that manufacturers implement innovative technologies, which reduce emissions of the vehicles when driven on the road.

    Emissions from other lifecycle stages of vehicles are regulated under separate pieces of EU legislation[3]. By end 2025, the Commission is required to adopt a methodology for assessing and reporting life-cycle CO2 emissions of vehicles.

    From June 2026, manufacturers may submit to the Commission life-cycle CO2 emissions data for their vehicles, calculated according to that methodology.

    • [1] Enshrined in the European Climate Law — http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2021/1119/oj.
    • [2] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/851/oj/eng.
    • [3] Such as the EU Emission Trading System Directive — http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2003/87/2024-03-01 and the Renewable Energy Directive — http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2018/2001/2024-07-16.
    Last updated: 11 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Blue Card scheme in the EU – E-001405/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    Directive (EU) 2021/1883[1] applies to all Member States except Ireland and Denmark, in accordance with Protocol No 21[2] and Protocol No 22[3], annexed to the Treaty on the European Union (TEU) and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).

    Consequently, Denmark is not bound by EU legislation in the area of legal migration (opt-out), while Ireland has chosen to not opt-in to the directive.

    Directive (EU) 2021/1883 harmonises the conditions of entry and residence for third-country nationals for the purpose of highly qualified employment.

    Member States are required to put in place the necessary procedures in line with the relevant provisions of the directive and they remain competent to assess applications for an EU Blue Card. In all instances, in accordance with Article 79(5) of the TFEU, Member States retain the right to determine the number of admissions of third-country nationals seeking work in their territory.

    Regarding family reunification, Directive 2003/86/EC[4] applies, subject to some specific derogations. Article 4 of that directive enumerates the family members who are entitled to family reunification subject to compliance with the conditions laid down in this directive.

    These are the Blue Card holder’s spouse as well as minor dependent children, including adopted children. In addition, Member States may choose to authorise the entry and residence of other family members, including dependent ascending relatives, adult unmarried children, unmarried or registered partners with their dependent children in compliance with the conditions laid down in Directive 2003/86/EC.

    • [1] Directive (EU) 2021/1883 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 October 2021 on the conditions of entry to and residence in the Union of third-country nationals for the purpose of highly qualified employment, and repealing Council Directive 2009/50/EC, OJ L 382, 28.10.2021, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2021/1883/oj.
    • [2] Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Protocol (No 21) on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland in respect of the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice, OJ C 202, 7.6.2016, p. 295, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/treaty/tfeu_2016/pro_21/oj.
    • [3] Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Protocol (No 22) on the position of Denmark, OJ C 326, 26.10.2012, p. 299, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/treaty/tfeu_2012/pro_22/oj.
    • [4] Council Directive 2003/86/EC of 22 September 2003 on the right to family reunification, OJ L 251, 3.10.2003, p. 12.
    Last updated: 11 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Development of life-saving medicines for rare diseases and bringing them to market – E-002031/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002031/2025/rev.1
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Aldo Patriciello (PfE), Isabella Tovaglieri (PfE), Anna Maria Cisint (PfE), Paolo Borchia (PfE), Silvia Sardone (PfE)

    The process of researching, developing and bringing life-saving drugs to market is hampered by significant financial costs, which often hinder access to innovative treatments, particularly for rare diseases.

    According to numerous industry experts and as documented in recent investigations, a significant number of promising drugs never reach the commercialisation stage because developers lack the funds needed to complete clinical trials, particularly for the transition phase from laboratory research to large-scale testing (known as ‘the valley of death’).

    Despite efforts to boost research into medicines for rare diseases, the number of medicines developed for rare diseases remains too low relative to patient numbers and therapeutic needs: there are more than 7 000 rare diseases and millions of Europeans have them.

    The Commission has a duty to ensure that everyone in the European Union has access to proper care, including life-saving therapies for rare diseases, through inclusive and sustainable health policies.

    In light of the above:

    • 1.What does the Commission have to say about the difficulties faced when researching and developing life-saving medicines?
    • 2.Could it inform Parliament how it plans to tackle this issue?

    Submitted: 21.5.2025

    Last updated: 11 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Israeli settlement products: alignment of EU policies with UN resolution – P-001801/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The EU has been consistently clear in its position that settlements are illegal under international law and repeatedly condemned Israel’s settlement policy and the occupation of the Palestinian territory that began in 1967.

    As reiterated by the European Council on 27 June[1] and 17 October 2024[2], the EU has recalled the requirement for Israel, in exercising its right to defend itself, to fully comply with its obligations under international law, including international humanitarian law, in all circumstances .

    EU positions and policies are fully aligned with United Nations (UN) resolutions on the status of the O ccupied Palestinian T erritory (OPT) and are therefore overall consistent with the conclusions of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) Advisory Opinion on the legal consequences arising from the policies and practices of Israel in the OPT, including East Jerusalem, of 19 July 2024[3], as regards the duty of non-recognition, the duty to distinguish in the dealings with Israel between its territory and the OPT, and the duty of non-assistance.

    With regard to the duty to distinguish in the dealings with Israel between its territory and the OPT, the EU has taken care to fully comply with the obligations set out in paragraph 278 of the ICJ Advisory Opinion of 19 July 2024 and point 4(d) of the UN General Council resolution of 13 September 2024[4].

    The Commission continues to monitor the situation in the OPT and has already listed nine individuals and five entities under the EU Global Human Rights Sanctions Regime for serious and systematic human rights abuses against Palestinians in the West Bank.

    The EU is firmly committed to a lasting and sustainable peace and has spared no effort to work with partners to revive the political process towards the implementation of a two-state solution.

    • [1] https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/qa3lblga/euco-conclusions-27062024-en.pdf.
    • [2] https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/2pebccz2/20241017-euco-conclusions-en.pdf.
    • [3] Summary of the Advisory Opinion of 19 July 2024, https://www.icj-cij.org/node/204176.
    • [4] https://docs.un.org/en/A/ES-10/L.31/Rev.1.
    Last updated: 11 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Alleged degrading treatment and gender-based abuses against activists at the hands of Italian police in Brescia, Italy – E-001068/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    Member States are responsible for maintaining law and order and safeguarding internal security, and any action by national authorities, including national police officers, remains the responsibility of the Member State concerned, Italy in this instance.

    The Commission attaches great importance to the respect for the procedural rights of suspects and accused persons. Based on proposals by the Commission, the EU has, since 2010, adopted six Directives, aiming at a high level of fair trial rights[1]. They cover important procedural rights, including the right of access to a lawyer without undue delay after deprivation of liberty.

    Another key priority of the Commission is the rights of victims of crime. The 2012 Victims’ Rights Directive[2] provides for a set of rights to all victims of crime, including victims of crime committed by police officers, notably the right to be recognised and treated in a respectful, sensitive, tailored, professional and non-discriminatory manner.

    In 2023, the Commission adopted a proposal for a revision of the Victims’ Rights Directive which aims to further strengthen the rights of all victims of crime, notably the most vulnerable victims.

    Member States should promote and apply their law enforcement rules of conduct in full respect of their European and international human rights obligations.

    According to these obligations, national authorities should investigate individual cases of reported police misconduct and ensure access to justice.

    • [1] Directive 2010/64/EU on the right to interpretation and translation in criminal proceedings; Directive 2012/13/EU on the right to information in criminal proceedings; Directive 2013/48/EU on the right of access to a lawyer in criminal proceedings and in European arrest warrant proceedings, and on the right to have a third party informed upon deprivation of liberty and to communicate with third persons and with consular authorities while deprived of liberty; Directive (EU) 2016/343 on the strengthening of certain aspects of the presumption of innocence and the right to be present at the trial; Directive (EU) 2016/800 on procedural safeguards for children who are suspects and accused in criminal proceedings; Directive (EU) 2016/1919 on legal aid for suspects and accused persons in criminal proceedings and for requested persons in European arrest warrant proceedings.
    • [2] Directive 2012/29/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 establishing minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime, and replacing Council Framework Decision 2001/220/JHA, OJ L 315, 14.11.2012, p. 57.
    Last updated: 11 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – IRIS² satellite constellation and contracts with European industrial manufacturers – E-001134/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission acknowledges the importance of ensuring that the EU’s critical communication infrastructure remains sovereign and resilient.

    The regulation establishing the EU Space Programme and the EU Agency for the Space Programme[1] and the regulation establishing the EU Secure Connectivity Programme[2] provide that the Commission applies eligibility and participation conditions if it deems that this is necessary and appropriate to preserve the security, integrity and resilience of the operational EU systems.

    In particular, they require that economic operators providing critical components and services are fulfilling the following eligibility and participation conditions :

    a) The eligible legal entity is established in a Member State and its executive management structures are established in that Member State;

    b) The eligible legal entity commits to carry out all relevant activities in one or more Member States; and

    c) The eligible legal entity is not to be subject to control by a third country or by a third country entity.

    It therefore ensures that critical technologies required to deploy and operate IRIS2 are under EU control.

    • [1] OJ L 170, 12.5.2021 p.69, ELI, Article 24: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2021/696/oj.
    • [2] OJ L 79, 17.3.2023 p.1, ELI, Article 22: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/588/oj.
    Last updated: 11 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Mandatory relocation of migrants – doubts surrounding the implementation of the Pact on Migration and Asylum – E-000588/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission refers the Honourable Member to its communication on the Common Implementation Plan[1] setting out the key actions required for the implementation of the Pact on Migration and Asylum[2], including on relocation.

    The Asylum and Migration Management Regulation[3] (AMMR) establishes a system of permanent and flexible solidarity among Member States. Each Member State has full discretion to choose its contribution to this solidarity system, and can choose from relocation, financial contributions and alternative measures (in-kind support).

    According to the AMMR, this solidarity mechanism will start applying in June 2026.

    • [1] COM(2024) 251 final, available at: https://home-affairs.ec.europa.eu/common-implementation-plan-pact-migration-and-asylum_en.
    • [2] https://home-affairs.ec.europa.eu/policies/migration-and-asylum/pact-migration-and-asylum_en.
    • [3] Regulation (EU) 2024/1351 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 May 2024 on asylum and migration management, amending Regulations (EU) 2021/1147 and (EU) 2021/1060 and repealing Regulation (EU) No 604/2013, OJ L, 2024/1351, 22.5.2024, (ELI: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1351/oj/eng).
    Last updated: 11 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Obligations concerning nationals who directly or indirectly support illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing – E-001562/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    One of the main pillars of Council Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008 (the IUU Regulation)[1] is action against EU nationals who have engaged in or supported illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing. The provisions regarding EU nationals cover both the prevention and sanction of support or engagement in IUU fishing by EU nationals.

    More specifically, Article 39(1) of the IUU Regulation prohibits EU nationals from supporting and engaging in IUU fishing. It further provides a non-exhaustive list of examples of such engagement and support, mentioning in particular engagement on board or as operators or beneficial owners of fishing vessels included in the EU IUU vessel list.

    However, the general prohibition to EU nationals from engaging in or supporting IUU fishing is not limited to involvement of IUU-listed vessels but IUU fishing activities in general.

    In addition, the obligation of Member States under Article 39(3) of the IUU Regulation to take action against EU nationals relates to those that have been identified as supporting or engaged in IUU fishing in general, not only to those that are involved with IUU-listed vessels.

    The Commission is working with Member States to provide support in the implementation of Article 40(1) of the IUU Regulation regarding the identification of information of EU nationals pertaining to legal, beneficial or financial interests in, or control of, fishing vessels flagged to a third country which they hold and the names of the vessels concerned.

    • [1] Council Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008 of 29 September 2008 establishing a Community system to prevent, deter and eliminate illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing, amending Regulations (EEC) No 2847/93, (EC) No 1936/2001 and (EC) No 601/2004 and repealing Regulations (EC) No 1093/94 and (EC) No 1447/1999 (OJ L 286, 29.10.2008, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2008/1005/oj).
    Last updated: 11 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Denunciation of statements by the President of Azerbaijan in support of the illegal separatist entity in Cyprus and the intention to recognise it – E-001498/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The High Representative/Vice-President of the Commission (HR/VP) has repeatedly refuted actions and statements aimed at upgrading the international status of the so-called, internationally not recognised, ‘Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus’, which undermine efforts of the United Nations Secretary General to create an environment conducive to settlement talks.

    The EU recognises only the Republic of Cyprus as a subject of international law, in accordance with the relevant United Nations Security Council (UNSC) resolutions.

    The EU expects the same from its partners, who need to respect the sovereignty and territorial integrity of all states within the framework of all international and regional fora, and to refrain from taking any steps that run contrary to this principle.

    This message has been clearly conveyed to the Azerbaijani authorities and the EU will continue to raise it at all levels in its political dialogue with Azerbaijan, as it was the case during HR/VP visit to Baku on 25 April 2025.

    The EU has monitored with concern developments since the Organisation of Turkic States (OTS) Summit in Samarkand, in November 2022, regarding the acceptance of the Turkish Cypriot Community as an observer to this organisation.

    A s tatement of the European External Action Service Spokesperson was issued, expressing a clear position about these developments[1]. The EU has actively and continuously expressed these preoccupations to the members of the OTS, at all levels.

    This has been done through HR/VP statements, lately in July (after the informal OTS Summit in Azerbaijan)[2] and November 2024 respectively[3].

    The EU remains fully committed to ensuring that the above-mentioned UNSC resolutions and generally recognised principles and norms of international law, particularly with respect to the sovereignty, independence and integrity of states, are fully upheld.

    • [1] https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/cyprus-statement-spokesperson-observer-status-turkish-cypriot-secessionist-entity-organisation_en?s=230.
    • [2] https://www.eeas.europa.eu/node/443430_fr.
    • [3] https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/ots-statement-hrvp-josep-borrell-attempts-legitimise-turkish-cypriot-secessionist-entity_en.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Future role and funding of the EU Rapid Deployment Capacity – E-001535/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The EU Rapid Deployment Capacity (EU RDC) is a flagship initiative of the Strategic Compass[1]. It is now operational as a robust and scalable military instrument that can be deployed in a swift manner to respond to crises outside EU borders. The EU RDC is composed of EU Battlegroups and pre-identified forces and capabilities provided by Member States.

    Over the past three years, preparatory work has focused on: securing the necessary forces and capabilities; supporting their readiness and interoperability through EU live exercises; strengthening the Military Planning and Conduct Capability (staffing, communication and information systems); and conducting advance planning. The operational readiness, however, requires continuous effort, notably Member States’ commitment.

    Since the EU RDC is implemented under the EU Common Security and Defence Policy, the financing of common costs related to its deployment and live exercises is done through the European Peace Facility[2]. The remainder of the costs related to the EU RDC is borne by Member States on a ‘costs lie where they fall’ basis.

    The deployment of the EU RDC, as is the case for all EU military operations, will require a unanimous decision of the Member States.

    More generally, in line with Article 42 of the Treaty on European Union, the EU RDC, as all actions conducted in the framework of the Common Security and Defence Policy, ‘shall not prejudice the specific character of the security and defence policy of certain Member States[3].

    • [1] https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/strategic-compass-security-and-defence-1_en..
    • [2] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32024D2846.
    • [3] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:12008M042.
    Last updated: 11 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Schengen Information System (SIS) reporting on returns – E-001100/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The statistical data collected by the European Union Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (eu-LISA) and by the statistical office of the European Union (Eurostat) have different scope and cover different time periods[1].

    The data collected by eu-LISA include return alerts entered in the Schengen Information System (SIS)[2]; Member States may refrain from entering such alerts in some cases[3].

    The statistics on SIS hits only cover the cases where the person subject to a SIS return alert left the territory of the Member States through a different Member State than the one that issued the alert.

    Teams composed of Commission and Member States’ experts evaluate the application of the Schengen acquis by Member States in accordance with Council Regulation (EU) 2022/922[4], including in the areas of return and of the large-scale information systems supporting the application of the Schengen acquis, such as SIS.

    While, according to eu-LISA’s annual statistics for 2023, all Member States that participate in Regulation (EU) 2018/1860 created return alerts, some experienced delays and, in some cases, return decisions were not systematically followed by a SIS alert.

    As follow-up to the Schengen evaluations, the Commission is working with Member States to ensure a seamless connection between return case management systems and the SIS to avoid delays and inconsistencies.

    The Commission does not collect statistics on the number of cases where a Member State executes the return decision issued by another Member State.

    • [1] Eurostat statistics cover the period between 1 January 2023 and 31 December 2023 while the eu-LISA statistics cover the period between 7 March 2023 and 31 December 2023.
    • [2] Article 3 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1860 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 November 2018 on the use of the Schengen Information System for the return of illegally staying third-country nationals, OJ L 312, 7.12.2018, p. 1-13.
    • [3] Article 3(2) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1860.
    • [4] Council Regulation (EU) 2022/922 of 9 June 2022 on the establishment and operation of an evaluation and monitoring mechanism to verify the application of the Schengen acquis, and repealing Regulation (EU) No 1053/2013, OJ L 160, 15.6.2022, p. 1-27.
    Last updated: 11 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Study – The taxation of the EU’s financial sector-Options and experiences – 11-06-2025

    Source: European Parliament

    This study provides a mapping of the existing financial sector taxes applied in EU Member States and summarises the empirical evidence on the various effects associated with individual financial sector taxes. It focuses on the taxation of financial transactions, bank taxes, and the taxation of financial services. Financial sector taxes are assessed in terms of their effect on fragmentation and the coherence of the EU financial sector. The study also sketches some directions for reform to improve coherence of financial sector taxation.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Latest news – Next Committee meeting: 24 June 2025 (Brussels) – Committee on Culture and Education

    Source: European Parliament

    The next CULT Committee meeting will take place on: Tuesday, 24 June, 2025, 9.15 – 10.00 (Coordinators’ meeting) and 14.30 – 17.00 in meeting room SPINELLI 3G2.

    Source : © European Union, 2025 – EP

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Proposal for revision of Directive 2014/45/EU — Eliminates the possibility of exceptions to motorcycle IPOs – P-002245/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Priority question for written answer  P-002245/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Sérgio Humberto (PPE), Sebastião Bugalho (PPE), Paulo Cunha (PPE), Ana Miguel Pedro (PPE), Hélder Sousa Silva (PPE), Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral (PPE)

    The Commission has proposed a revision of Directive 2014/45/EU that removes the exemption from mandatory periodic inspections on motorcycles with an engine displacement of more than 125 cm³, making inspections mandatory in the Member States. It has calculated that some 10 % of road accidents may be caused by technical defects. The purpose of the revised version is to standardise rules, improve road safety and reduce pollutant emissions.

    Some countries have adopted different approaches tailored to their circumstances, including other road safety measures such as upgrades to infrastructure and the provision of education on safe driving practices. Portugal has opted for alternative measures that adapt policies to its specific road-infrastructure and administrative needs.

    In view of the above:

    • 1.In the proposal for a directive, the Commission states that 10 % of accidents are caused by technical defects. What studies did the Commission base that figure on?
    • 2.With regard to the stakeholders it consulted, does the Commission not share the view that the bias was towards industrial associations, to the detriment of associations of users of two-wheeled vehicles?
    • 3.At a time when the Commission is taking steps to cut red tape and simplify, does it not consider that this proposal for a directive goes in the opposite direction by imposing more rules and obstacles to movement without a proper impact assessment having been carried out?

    Submitted: 4.6.2025

    Last updated: 11 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Oral question – ‘Choose Europe for Science’ plan and intrusion of wokism at universities – O-000021/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for oral answer  O-000021/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 142
    Mathilde Androuët (PfE), Jean-Paul Garraud (PfE), Galato Alexandraki (ECR), Christophe Bay (PfE), Barbara Bonte (PfE), Marie-Luce Brasier-Clain (PfE), Anna Bryłka (PfE), Marie Dauchy (PfE), Valérie Deloge (PfE), Emmanouil Fragkos (ECR), Anne-Sophie Frigout (PfE), Tomasz Froelich (ESN), Angéline Furet (PfE), Juan Carlos Girauta Vidal (PfE), Catherine Griset (PfE), Jorge Martín Frías (PfE), Fernand Kartheiser (NI), Jorge Buxadé Villalba (PfE), Fabrice Leggeri (PfE), Julien Leonardelli (PfE), Tiago Moreira de Sá (PfE), Aleksandar Nikolic (PfE), Philippe Olivier (PfE), Gilles Pennelle (PfE), Pascale Piera (PfE), Pierre Pimpie (PfE), Julie Rechagneux (PfE), Volker Schnurrbusch (ESN), António Tânger Corrêa (PfE), Dominik Tarczyński (ECR), Hermann Tertsch (PfE), Rody Tolassy (PfE), Laurence Trochu (ECR), Sebastian Tynkkynen (ECR), Matthieu Valet (PfE), Séverine Werbrouck (PfE), Ondřej Knotek (PfE)

    On 5 May 2025, President Emmanuel Macron launched the ‘Choose Europe for Science’ initiative at the Sorbonne amphitheatre to make France and Europe more attractive to researchers and entrepreneurs[1]. This initiative foresees an additional investment of EUR 100 million[2]. For her part, Commission President Von der Leyen proposed EUR 500 million to make Europe a ‘pole of attraction’. The 2030 target is to increase investment in R&D to 3% of GDP. Behind this plan is mainly the desire to attract researchers fleeing the United States, where budget cuts have been decided by the Trump administration, with the aim of countering the influence of wokism in American universities[3].

    • 1.What specific actions does the Commission intend to take to combat wokism and to re-establish universities as places of knowledge and excellence?
    • 2.How will the announced funds be used? To what extent will they primarily benefit European researchers and students in order to improve their working conditions?

    Submitted: 10.6.2025

    Lapses: 11.9.2025

    • [1] Launch of “Choose Europe for Science” at the Sorbonne, Élysée, 5 May 2025, URL: https://www.elysee.fr/en/emmanuel-macron/2025/05/05/launch-of-choose-europe-for-science-at-the-sorbonne
    • [2] Emmanuel Macron annonce un nouvel investissement de 100 millions d’euros pour séduire les chercheurs étrangers [Emmanuel Macron announces a new investment of EUR 100 million to attract foreign researchers], Le Monde, 5 May 2025, URL: :https://www.lemonde.fr/sciences/article/2025/05/05/emmanuel-macron-annonce-un-nouvel-investissement-de-100-millions-d-euros-pour-seduire-les-chercheurs-etrangers_6603132_1650685.html
    • [3] Choose Europe for Science : pour les scientifiques américains, un accueil en France dans des universités délabrées [Choose Europe for Science: American scientists welcomed to France amid dilapidated universities], Libération, 4 May 2025, URL: https://www.liberation.fr/sciences/choose-europe-for-science-pour-les-scientifiques-americains-un-accueil-en-france-dans-des-universites-delabrees-20250504_QGTCYN5GDJAFTFL7J3OSK3J74I/

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Himes Statement on Trump Administration Actions in California Washington, DC – Today, Congressman Jim Himes (CT-04) released the following statement: “Donald Trump has deployed a lethal fighting force into California…”

    Source: United States House of Representatives – CONGRESSMAN JIM HIMES (4th District of Connecticut)

    Himes Statement on Trump Administration Actions in California | Press Releases | Congressman Jim Himes

    Washington, DC – Today, Congressman Jim Himes (CT-04) released the following statement:

    “Donald Trump has deployed a lethal fighting force into California against the explicit wishes of state leadership— a disproportional and incendiary response obviously intended to strike fear into his dissidents and fan the flames of an already unstable situation. Violence is never acceptable, and individuals who broke the law should be held accountable by local law enforcement. However, I fully support those in California who are asserting their first amendment rights through peaceful protest.

    “This President feeds off political theater and discord. He does not care if Americans are injured or killed, as long as the Fox News headline furthers his personal agenda. My Republican colleagues should remember why they were elected and stand up in defense of the people who sent them here. Otherwise, more violence is inevitable, and all those who failed to act will be complicit.”

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: ICE conducts worksite inspections at Baton Rouge massage parlors

    Source: US Immigration and Customs Enforcement

    June 11, 2025Baton Rouge, LA, United StatesWorksite Enforcement

    On June 11, 2025, HSI Baton Rouge conducted a worksite enforcement operation at nine (9) illicit massage businesses in the Baton Rouge, Louisiana metropolitan area. Agents obtained entry to the premises based on state criminal search warrants for prostitution and pandering. As a result of the operation, ten (10) Chinese-national females were detained by HSI for further identification and removal processing. Interviews are currently being conducted to determine removability. Bulk cash and other evidence was seized during the operation and is actively being counted and analyzed. The Attorney General of Louisiana, Liz Murrill, and the District Attorney of East Baton Rouge Parish, Hillar Moore, participated in the operation and remain on scene at the HSI Baton Rouge command post.

    This is a joint investigation between HSI and the East Baton Rouge Sheriff’s Office with support from Enforcement and Removal Operations, the Drug Enforcement Administration, the U.S. Border Patrol, the Louisiana Attorney General, the East Baton Rouge Parish District Attorney’s Office, the Louisiana Bureau of Investigation, the East Baton Rouge Sheriff’s Office, the Baton Rouge Police Department, the Zachary Police Department, Baton Rouge Fire Department, and the St. George Fire Department.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Hofood99 Inc Recalls Enoki Mushroom Due to Possible Health Risk

    Source: US Department of Health and Human Services – 3

    Summary

    Company Announcement Date:
    June 11, 2025
    FDA Publish Date:
    June 11, 2025
    Product Type:
    Food & Beverages
    Reason for Announcement:

    Recall Reason Description
    Potential Foodborne Illness – Listeria monocytogenes

    Company Name:
    Hofood99 Inc.
    Brand Name:

    Brand Name(s)
    No Brand

    Product Description:

    Product Description
    Enoki Mushrooms

    Company Announcement
    Hofood99 Inc of Brooklyn, NY 11231 is recalling its 200g packages of Enoki Mushroom, because they may be contaminated with Listeria monocytogenes, an organism which can cause serious and sometimes fatal infections in young children, frail or elderly people and others with weakened immune systems. Although healthy persons may suffer only short-term symptoms such as high fever, severe headache, stiffness, nausea, abdominal pain, and diarrhea, Listeria infection can cause miscarriages and stillbirths among pregnant women.
    The recalled Enoki Mushrooms were distributed nationwide in retail stores. The product comes in a 200g, green plastic package marked with UPC Barcode 6 976532 310051 on the back label, distributed by Hofood99 Inc., 21903 56th Ave Oakland Gardens, NY 11364.
    No illnesses have been reported to date in connection with this problem.
    The contamination was discovered after samples were collected from a store in Michigan and subsequent analysis by Michigan Department of Agriculture & Rural Development (MDARD) Laboratory Division revealed the presence of Listeria monocytogenes.
    Consumers who purchased the 200-gram package of Enoki mushrooms are advised to destroy the product immediately or return it to the place of purchase for a full refund. If you have any questions, please contact the company at (917) 756-9833. 9:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m., Monday to Friday.

    Company Contact Information

    Consumers:
    Hofood99 Inc.
    917-756-9833

    Media:
    Jiajie He
    917-756-9833

    Product Photos

    Content current as of:
    06/11/2025

    Regulated Product(s)

    Follow FDA

    MIL OSI USA News