Category: AM-NC

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Authoritarian restructuring of the Turkish state without consequences for EU candidate status – E-001451/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The April 2024 European Council conclusions[1] highlighted the EU’s strategic interest in a stable and secure environment in the Eastern Mediterranean and in the development of a cooperative and mutually beneficial relationship with Türkiye. This aligns with the November 2023 Joint Communication[2], advocating for a progressive, proportionate, and reversible approach.

    As an EU candidate country and long-standing member of the Council of Europe, Türkiye is expected to apply the highest democratic standards and practices.

    Full respect for fundamental rights and the rule of law will continue to be an integral part of EU-Türkiye relations. The Commission’s position on the arrest of the Mayor of Istanbul on 19 March 2025 was spelled out in the joint statement[3] of the High Representative/Vice-President and Commissioner for Enlargement and Eastern Neighbourhood, issued on the day of the mayor’s detention.

    The statement stressed that the events gave rise to questions regarding Türkiye’s adherence to its long-established democratic tradition. The EU urged the Turkish authorities to provide full transparency and follow due process.

    Accession negotiations with Türkiye remain at a standstill since June 2018, following the decisions of the Council[4]. This position was re-confirmed by the Council in December 2024[5].

    Consequently, the Commission has reduced financial support to Türkiye, with funding reoriented towards support for civil society organisations and EU key priorities.

    • [1] https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/m5jlwe0p/euco-conclusions-20240417-18-en.pdf.
    • [2] https://enlargement.ec.europa.eu/joint-communication-european-council-state-play-eu-turkiye-political-economic-and-trade-relations-0_en.
    • [3] https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/statement_25_836.
    • [4] https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/35863/st10555-en18.pdf.
    • [5] https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-16983-2024-INIT/en/pdf.
    Last updated: 27 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Changes to cohesion policy and their impact on regional disparity – E-001656/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission’s proposal of 1 April 2025[1] for a regulation amending the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), the Cohesion Fund, and the Just Transition Fund as regards specific measures to address specific challenges in the context of the mid-term review does not propose a change to the distribution of the resources across the different categories of regions, nor to the provisions governing possible transfers between categories of regions or to the methodology on the allocation per Member State[2].

    Therefore, required resources for less developed regions cannot be used for transition or more developed regions. Furthermore, the possibilities provided for in the proposal are of a voluntary nature and amendments of individual programmes require prior approval by the relevant monitoring committee before they are submitted to the Commission.

    The implementation data submitted by the Member States indicates that some of the 2021-2027 resources remain unallocated. At a time of mounting challenges and limited fiscal space, it is necessary to maximise the utilisation of the available allocations, and the managing authorities will have the opportunity to direct them towards strategic investments that address urgent challenges which risk weakening the economic, social and territorial cohesion of the EU.

    • [1] COM(2025) 123 final.
    • [2] Articles 110, 111 and Annex XXVI of Regulation (EU) 2021/1060 (the Common Provisions Regulation).
    Last updated: 27 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Need for broader deregulation and simplification to reduce administrative burdens – E-001664/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The target for reducing reporting obligations’ burden has been set at 25% in March 2023, in the ‘Long term competitiveness’ Communication[1].

    As indicated in the communication ‘A Simpler and Faster Europe’[2], this target has been expanded to cover all administrative burden, and up to 35% for small and medium enterprises (SMEs). This represents a target of EUR 37.5 billion of savings over the mandate.

    The President of the Commission has made the reduction of red tape a priority for the new mandate of the Commission as explained in answer to E-1084/2025.

    The roadmap has been set in the ‘Competitiveness compass’ and the communication ‘A Simpler and Faster Europe’ and simplification omnibuses have been adopted on 26 February, 14 May, 21 May and 17 June 2025. However, while aiming at achieving significant simplification, the Commission proposals nevertheless preserve the EU policy goals.

    The Better Regulation tools have been reinforced (e.g. through the SME and Competitiveness checks, and the scrutiny of delegated and implementing acts) to ensure that EU legislation is designed with implementation and simplification in mind right from the outset.

    The communication also underscores the important role of the co-legislators for this process:

    The European Parliament and the Council have a central role to play in creating simple and effective rules at the lowest administrative cost for people and companies. In 2016, both institutions committed to the principle of assessing the impacts of their substantial amendments when appropriate.

    • [1] https://commission.europa.eu/system/files/2023-03/Communication_Long-term-competitiveness.pdf.
    • [2] https://commission.europa.eu/document/download/8556fc33-48a3-4a96-94e8-8ecacef1ea18_en?filename=250201_Simplification_Communication_en.pdf.
    Last updated: 27 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Commission’s assesment of EIOPA findings regarding NOVIS case – E-001855/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    Under Article 30 of the Solvency II Directive[1], the financial supervision of insurance undertakings with their head office located in the territory of a Member State is the sole responsibility of the supervisory authority of that Member State.

    The Commission’s opinion issued according to Article 17(4) of the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) Regulation[2] concerns the way and the extent to which the national supervisor exercised its supervisory powers under the Solvency II Directive following the detection of non-compliance by a Slovakian insurance undertaking with Solvency II requirements.

    Article 17(4) of the EIOPA Regulation does not confer on the Commission any powers to open an autonomous investigation upon any individual undertaking that is the object of the national competent authority’s supervision. This provision provides that the Commission’s formal opinion shall take into account the EIOPA’s recommendation.

    The factual background and assessment of the situation of the Slovak insurance undertaking referred to in the Commission’s opinion are based on the evidence and assessment provided by the national supervisory authority, which is the sole authority empowered to exercise direct supervisory competence towards insurance undertakings under its jurisdiction, and by EIOPA, including in the context of inspections of a collaboration platform.

    The Commission and EIOPA discussed the findings referred to in the EIOPA Recommendation and concurred that supervisory action was necessary.

    • [1] OJ L 335, 17.12.2009, p. 1-155.
    • [2] OJ L 331, 15.12.2010, p. 48-83.
    Last updated: 27 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Transparency in the allocation of European funds intended for persons with disabilities in France – E-001925/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The European Social Fund Plus (ESF+) is implemented under shared management. It is up to Member States to decide which measures they want to invest in, in line with the specific objectives of the ESF+ Regulation[1].

    All Managing Authorities (MA) must have a website with information on programmes under its responsibility, covering the programme’s objectives, activities, available funding opportunities, achievements, and a list of operations selected for support (Article 49 of the Common Provisions Regulation (CPR)[2]).

    For the selection of operations, the MA shall establish and apply criteria and procedures which are non-discriminatory, transparent, ensure accessibility to persons with disabilities, ensure gender equality, and take account of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (‘the Charter’), the principle of sustainable development and the EU policy on environment (Article 73(1) of the CPR).

    Article 69(7) of the CPR stipulates that it is the Member States’ responsibility to ensure the effective examination of complaints concerning the Funds.

    The scope, rules and procedures concerning those arrangements are the responsibility of Member States in accordance with their institutional and legal framework. This is without prejudice to the general possibility of citizens and stakeholders to address complaints to the Commission.

    The Horizontal Enabling Conditions on the effective application and implementation of the Charter and on the implementation and application of the United Nations Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities (UNCRPD) reiterate that Member States need to have reporting arrangements to the monitoring committee regarding cases of non-compliance of operations in place.

    • [1] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32021R1057 .
    • [2] Regulation (EU) 2021/1060 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 June 2021 laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund Plus, the Cohesion Fund, the Just Transition Fund and the European Maritime, Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund and financial rules for those and for the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund, the Internal Security Fund and the Instrument for Financial Support for Border Management and Visa Policy.
    Last updated: 27 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Briefing – Belgium’s National Recovery and Resilience Plan: Latest state of play – 27-06-2025

    Source: European Parliament

    The EU’s Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF) is the core component of Next Generation EU (NGEU). By promoting the sustainable and inclusive recovery after the COVID-19 pandemic that ensures the green and digital transitions make progress, the RRF is consistent with the European Commission’s priorities. Belgium’s initial maximum contribution to finance its national recovery and resilience plan (NRRP) was set to €5 924 million in grants. The amount was updated in June 2022 and reduced to €4 523 million. In addition, the non-repayable allocation for the REPowerEU chapter to reinforce the NRRP’s energy dimension is set at €281 million. Belgium also submitted a reasoned request to transfer part of its allocation from the resources of the Brexit Adjustment Reserve to the RRF (€228 million). Finally, Belgium requested a loan support of €264 million. The overall EU financial contribution to the amended Belgian NRRP stands thus at €5 298 million; it represents 0.7 % of the entire RRF, and 1.1 % of Belgium’s gross domestic product (GDP) in 2019. The Council approved Belgium’s amended NRRP in December 2023. Other targeted revisions took place in 2024 and 2025. In total, Belgium has received €2.46 billion so far: €915.1 million in pre-financing – 13 % of the initial NRRP (€770 million, all grants) in 2021, and 20 % of the REPowerEU chapter (€102.1 million in grants, €43 million in loans) in 2024; and two result-based instalments – one of €631.6 million (all grants) in September 2024, and another of €909 million (of which €40 million in loans) in May 2025. The European Parliament, which was a major advocate of creating a common EU recovery instrument, participates in interinstitutional forums for cooperation and discussion on RRF implementation and scrutinises the European Commission’s work. This briefing is one in a series covering all EU Member States. Third edition. The ‘NGEU delivery’ briefings are updated at key stages throughout the lifecycle of the plans.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Canada: Health Canada launches public consultation on proposed changes to increase oversight of precursor chemicals and drug equipment

    Source: Government of Canada News (2)

    June 27, 2025 | Ottawa, Ontario | Health Canada

    The Government of Canada is taking action to keep communities safe on both sides of the border. This includes detecting and disrupting the illegal fentanyl trade.

    Today, the Minister of Health, Marjorie Michel, launched a 45-day public consultation on proposed changes to how Canada regulates precursor chemicals and devices such as pill presses and encapsulators that could be used in the illegal production of drugs. The consultation is open until August 12, 2025.

    The public consultation will allow impacted stakeholders, such as regulated industries that use precursors for legitimate uses, pharmacies and individual pharmacists, to provide feedback on the proposed changes. These changes would strengthen controls around precursor chemicals and drug equipment to support law and border enforcement as they take action to stop their illegal importation and distribution.  

    MIL OSI Canada News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Arbitrary detention of peaceful protesters and their detention conditions in Türkiye – E-001704/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The EU reacted swiftly to the detention of mayor İmamoğlu and the arrests and charges brought against elected officials, political activists, civil society and businesses representatives, journalists, and others with the Statement of the High Representative/Vice-President and Commissioner for Enlargement of 19 March 2025[1].

    On 24 March 2025,[2] the Commission urged the Turkish authorities to uphold democratic values and to fully respect the rights of elected officials as well as right of peaceful demonstration.

    It reminded that as a Council of Europe member and EU candidate, Türkiye must uphold democratic values. The Commission, as well as the Delegation of the EU to Türkiye, expressed both in public and in private meetings with the Turkish authorities the need for Türkiye to uphold the EU standards in relation to freedom of expression and of assembly, including in relation to recent detentions of peaceful protesters in recent weeks.

    The Commission has regularly raised its concerns on the detention conditions in Turkish prisons and detention centres in its enlargement reports on Türkiye[3] and in particular on the need to improve access to healthcare, rehabilitation and resocialisation programmes.

    • [1] https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/statement_25_836.
    • [2] https://audiovisual.ec.europa.eu/en/video/I-269761.
    • [3] https://enlargement.ec.europa.eu/turkiye-report-2024_en.
    Last updated: 27 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Global Gateway initiative – E-002457/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002457/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Engin Eroglu (Renew), Joachim Streit (Renew)

    The Global Gateway initiative aims to offer a strategic alternative to China’s Belt and Road Initiative. Funded by European taxpayers, it seeks to promote European values and interests worldwide.

    However, media reports indicate that Chinese state-owned enterprises have won major contracts under EU-funded projects abroad. In some years, they reportedly secured more contract value financed by the European Investment Bank (EIB) than European firms.

    This raises serious concerns about the responsible use of EU funds, the competitiveness of European industry, and the EU’s strategic autonomy.

    • 1.Can the Commission confirm the accuracy of recent media reports regarding Chinese companies being awarded contracts under Global Gateway and in EIB-funded projects, and clarify the extent of their involvement?
    • 2.What measures is the Commission taking – both independently and in cooperation with the EIB – to ensure that EU-funded infrastructure projects do not benefit strategic competitors or undermine Europe’s geopolitical and economic interests, and that European companies and workers benefit fairly from these initiatives?
    • 3.What reforms to the EIB’s procurement rules for non-EU projects could help block tenders based on unfair competition, such as incorporating principles from the Foreign Subsidies Regulation[1]?

    Submitted: 18.6.2025

    • [1] Regulation (EU) 2022/2560 of 14 December 2022 on foreign subsidies distorting the internal market, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2560/oj.
    Last updated: 27 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Statements by the President of Azerbaijan on achieving international recognition of the pseudo-state through the Organization of Turkic States – E-001683/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The EU has consistently opposed any actions or statements that seek to upgrade the international status of the so-called ‘Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus’, a territory not recognised by the international community.

    Such moves undermine the United Nations (UN) efforts to create a conducive environment for settlement talks. The EU only recognises the Republic of Cyprus as a subject of international law, in line with relevant UN Security Council resolutions.

    The EU has been closely monitoring developments since the Organisation of Turkic States (OTS) Summit in Samarkand in November 2022, when the Turkish Cypriot secessionist entity became an observer to the organisation.

    The EU has expressed its concerns through public statements, including one from the European External Action Service (EEAS) Spokesperson[1], and has actively engaged with all OTS Member States, including Azerbaijan, at all levels on this worrying development. The High Representative/Vice-President has reiterated these concerns in statements made in July[2] and November 2024[3].

    The EU expects its partners to respect the sovereignty and territorial integrity of all states and to avoid taking any steps that contradict this principle.

    This expectation has been clearly communicated to Azerbaijan during the visit of the High Representative/Vice-President of the Commission on 25 April 2025, and the EU will continue to convey this message at all levels of political dialogue.

    The EU remains committed to upholding relevant UN Security Council resolutions and fundamental principles of international law, particularly regarding state sovereignty, independence, and integrity. It will continue to work towards ensuring that these principles are fully respected.

    • [1] https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/cyprus-statement-spokesperson-observer-status-turkish-cypriot-secessionist-entity-organisation_en?s=230.
    • [2] https://www.eeas.europa.eu/node/443430_fr.
    • [3] https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/ots-statement-hrvp-josep-borrell-attempts-legitimise-turkish-cypriot-secessionist-entity_en.
    Last updated: 27 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Imprisoned EU citizens – E-001441/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    Protecting EU citizens abroad, including those who may be imprisoned in non-EU countries, as well as the collection and provision of detailed information regarding the imprisonment of EU citizens in non-EU countries, falls within the exclusive competency of Member States.

    At their request, the European External Action Service can support Member States in coordinating efforts to ensure the consular protection of unrepresented EU citizens, and may facilitate information sharing where possible, but it does not have the mandate to directly collect or disseminate such data.

    Last updated: 27 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Skin sensitisation tests involving the use of guinea pigs – E-001720/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    In 2022, 33 029 skin sensitisation tests were conducted on animals constituting a reduction of 12.2% compared to 2018 and 12.5% compared to 2021.

    Based on ALURES[1] data, most guinea pig sensitisation assays occur in the medical devices (MD) sector. Testing requirements for these are governed by the International Organisation for Standardisation standards, and the relevant standard 10993-10:2021[2] still lists guinea pig assays next to the local lymph node assay (LLNA) and non-animal methods.

    Member States are expected to urge manufacturers to validate the LLNA or other alternatives for specific needs such as MD. Manufacturers should prioritise application of Defined Approaches for skin sensitisation.

    These consist of a combination of non-animal methods and a defined algorithm to interpret results and are described in the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Guideline 497[3]. These approaches have superior performance compared to the LLNA in predicting human responses.

    Member States require regular reporting on progress made with alternatives, or to limit the project authorisation period for animal tests.

    If validation of the alternative fails, use of animals should continue to be allowed. The Commission collaborates closely with Member States to remind them of the obligations[4] under Directive 2010/63[5] to ask product-specific qualification of recognised alternatives.

    The European Partnership for Alternative Approaches to Animal Testing[6] has invited the MD industry to join initiatives such as the skin sensitisation project to share knowledge and accelerate qualification of non-animal methods also by MD manufacturers.

    The Commission will publish a Roadmap on phasing out animal testing which covers MD legislation.

    • [1] https://environment.ec.europa.eu/topics/chemicals/animals-science/statistics-and-non-technical-project-summaries_en.
    • [2] Biological evaluation of medical devices — Part 10: Tests for skin sensitisation.
    • [3] https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/guideline-no-497-defined-approaches-on-skin-sensitisation_b92879a4-en.html.
    • [4] E.g., during bi-annual meetings.
    • [5] Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes, OJ L 276, 20.10.2010, p. 33-79.
    • [6] https://single-market-economy.ec.europa.eu/sectors/chemicals/european-partnership-alternative-approaches-animal-testing_en.
    Last updated: 27 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Further sanctions against Nord Stream – P-002107/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The EU has imposed unprecedented restrictive measures (sanctions) in response to Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, including far-reaching trade restrictions in several economic sectors, and specific financial measures against Russian individuals and entities.

    As the Honourable Member is aware, these sanctions are adopted under the EU’s Common Foreign and Security Policy and are aimed to maximise their impact on Russia’s ability to conduct and finance its war of aggression.

    On 10 June 2025, the Commission President and the High Representative/Vice-President[1] stated that the joint proposal for the 18th sanctions package includes, among other measures, sanctions on the Nord Stream pipelines.

    This measure should prevent Russia from generating any revenue in the future by using those pipelines to transport natural gas. Those future measures are currently discussed in the Council and require a unanimous adoption.

    The proposals and the negotiations in the Council are not public. Hence, the Commission is not able to comment further on measures prior to their adoption in the Council.

    The Commission will continue to cooperate and coordinate closely with Member States and operators on the implementation and enforcement of sanctions once they are adopted.

    • [1] https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/ukrainerussia-press-remarks-high-representativevice-president-kaja-kallas-joint-press-conference_en.
    Last updated: 27 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Further sanctions against Nord Stream – P-002107/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The EU has imposed unprecedented restrictive measures (sanctions) in response to Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, including far-reaching trade restrictions in several economic sectors, and specific financial measures against Russian individuals and entities.

    As the Honourable Member is aware, these sanctions are adopted under the EU’s Common Foreign and Security Policy and are aimed to maximise their impact on Russia’s ability to conduct and finance its war of aggression.

    On 10 June 2025, the Commission President and the High Representative/Vice-President[1] stated that the joint proposal for the 18th sanctions package includes, among other measures, sanctions on the Nord Stream pipelines.

    This measure should prevent Russia from generating any revenue in the future by using those pipelines to transport natural gas. Those future measures are currently discussed in the Council and require a unanimous adoption.

    The proposals and the negotiations in the Council are not public. Hence, the Commission is not able to comment further on measures prior to their adoption in the Council.

    The Commission will continue to cooperate and coordinate closely with Member States and operators on the implementation and enforcement of sanctions once they are adopted.

    • [1] https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/ukrainerussia-press-remarks-high-representativevice-president-kaja-kallas-joint-press-conference_en.
    Last updated: 27 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Delegated act on low carbon hydrogen – E-002477/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002477/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Filip Turek (PfE)

    According to media reports[1] and analyses of information at our disposal, the Commission’s upcoming delegated act on low-carbon hydrogen (LCH) sets very strict criteria for its production, including a tightening of the baseline values for lifecycle emissions calculations. However, the Commission’s proposal still does not allow for the conclusion of power purchase agreements (PPAs) or the direct connection of production facilities to low-carbon electricity sources such as nuclear power plants. Should the current criteria remain unchanged, LCH production in Czechia would be virtually unfeasible.

    • 1.In light of the above, will the Commission allow the certification of nuclear sourced PPAs as soon as possible and not wait until July 2028 to decide on this matter, as is currently proposed?
    • 2.Does the Commission agree that allowing producers to use electricity sourced via PPAs would significantly reduce the emissions associated with LCH, thereby enabling Czechia to ramp up its production?

    Submitted: 19.6.2025

    • [1] https://www.euractiv.com/section/eet/news/draft-eu-low-carbon-hydrogen-rules-face-epp-opposition/.
    Last updated: 27 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – A police officer’s infiltration of the political movement Potere al Popolo: a potential violation of democratic principles and fundamental freedoms – E-002470/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002470/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Pasquale Tridico (The Left), Dario Tamburrano (The Left), Rudi Kennes (The Left), Ilaria Salis (The Left), Mimmo Lucano (The Left), Manon Aubry (The Left), Estrella Galán (The Left), Catarina Martins (The Left), Özlem Demirel (The Left), Carolina Morace (The Left), Marc Botenga (The Left), Martin Schirdewan (The Left), Gaetano Pedulla’ (The Left), Pernando Barrena Arza (The Left), Jussi Saramo (The Left), Mario Furore (The Left), Anthony Smith (The Left), Konstantinos Arvanitis (The Left)

    The recent news regarding an Italian police officer’s infiltration of the political movement Potere al Popolo without apparent judicial authorisation, if confirmed, raises serious concerns about the violation of democratic principles and the rule of law. This episode takes place in an already worrying context, marked by concerns expressed by the Commission in 2024 about the deterioration of press freedom and attacks on independent journalists in Italy.

    Such practices risk undermining the principles enshrined in Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union and Articles 11 and 12 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, and are in conflict with the European Media Freedom Act on the protection of journalists and the promotion of political pluralism.

    • 1.Is the Commission aware of these practices and what measures does it intend to take to ensure the protection of political parties and civic movements in the EU?
    • 2.Does it consider that this case could constitute a violation of the fundamental values of the EU and of the principle of proportionality enshrined in Article 52 of the Charter?
    • 3.Can it clarify whether it is monitoring or if investigations are under way regarding governmental infiltration of political parties, and what instruments it intends to activate to prevent similar interference and ensure the protection of democratic freedoms?

    Submitted: 18.6.2025

    Last updated: 27 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Exemption from extended duty on bicycle parts imported from China – E-001759/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    In the case described by the Honourable Member, it appears that the company importing the bicycle parts is not an exempted party, and the parts that it imports are then sent to an exempted company.

    Regarding the importation, as the company importing the goods is not an exempted party, it can only import in exemption from the extended duties complying with the requirements for end-use of Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 88/97[1].

    The granting of an end-use authorisation, as well as the control of compliance with the requirements and the end-use procedure, are the responsibility of the customs authorities of the Member States.

    Regarding the exempted company, Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 88/97 requires that where that company receives deliveries of essential bicycle parts which have been exempted from the extended duty pursuant to Article 2, those parts are either used in its assembly operations or assembly of other products, destroyed, re-exported, or resold to another exempted party.

    Regarding sales, these parts cannot be resold to non-exempted parties. Any operation not in line with these rules would constitute a breach of the obligations of the exempted party.

    • [1] Commission Regulation (EC) No 88/97 of 20 January 1997 on the authorisation of the exemption of imports of certain bicycle parts originating in the People’s Republic of China from the extension by Council Regulation (EC) No 71/97 of the anti-dumping duty imposed by Council Regulation (EEC) No 2474/93, http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/1997/88/2023-03-21.
    Last updated: 27 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Supporting the development of a strong and competitive European nuclear energy sector – E-001746/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    To deliver the clean energy transition, all zero- and low-carbon energy solutions are needed. When part of the energy mix, nuclear has a role to play in building a resilient and clean energy system.

    Necessary investments will enable the EU to keep its industrial leadership in this sector and upholding the highest standards on safety and management of radioactive waste.

    The Commission presented the Clean Industrial Deal (CID)[1] and the action plan for Affordable Energy[2] to improve competitiveness and reduce energy costs for EU industries in the transition. On 13 June 2025, the Commission adopted the new Nuclear Illustrative Programme (PINC).

    It assesses costs and investment needs covering the full life cycle of nuclear installations, upskilling, diversification, and the development of competitive supply chains.

    The PINC also assesses financing models for a faster development and safe deployment of new nuclear technologies, such as Small Modular Reactors (SMRs), Advanced Modular Reactors and microreactors in Europe.

    Under the reformed internal energy market legislation, nuclear projects have equal access to financing schemes including Contracts for Difference and Power Purchase Agreements[3].

    The Commission works with the European Investment Bank on initiatives announced in the CID, supported by InvestEU, and is preparing a Clean Energy Investment Strategy.

    The Commission has also announced the design phase of a new potential Important Project of Common European Interest candidate on innovative nuclear technologies.

    Based on the first deliverables of the European Industrial Alliance on SMRs, the Commission will table a strategic plan on de-risking SMR projects, strengthening the EU supply chain, and attracting private investment.

    • [1] https://commission.europa.eu/topics/eu-competitiveness/clean-industrial-deal_en.
    • [2] https://energy.ec.europa.eu/strategy/affordable-energy_en.
    • [3] Including combining Contracts for Difference and Power Purchase Agreements.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Access to school canteens in Sicily and the use of ESF+ and NRRP funds – E-001981/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission acknowledges the situation regarding school canteens in Sicily and is working closely with Italy to ensure the effective implementation of the National Recovery and Resilience Plan[1]. Investment 1.2[2] supports the construction or renovation of canteen spaces for at least 1 000 structures[3].

    This would allow schools to extend school time, increase the educational offer and keep schools open beyond school hours. The Commission will assess its implementation via the target for ‘Structures to host students beyond school time’[4], whose completion is expected by Q2 2026.

    The European Social Fund + (ESF+) regional programme (RP) in Sicily contributes to combat education poverty and improve access to essential services.

    Under its specific objective 4.5[5], the RP launched in 2023 the call ‘Open schools for the territory’[6], making available EUR 27 million[7] to enhance training provision, supporting students at risk of failure and dropout, and promoting schools as cultural hubs. The call also supports access to school canteens, covering the costs of meals for students participating to afternoon activities.

    The ESF+ contributes to the implementation of the Child Guarantee through targeted actions and structural reforms to tackle child poverty.

    To this end, Italy has earmarked EUR 1.1 billion of ESF+ resources, with roughly EUR 25 million[8] to be invested in Sicily. The Commission regularly monitors these funds to ensure goals are met.

    Member States have developed national plans for the Child Guarantee, also overseen by the Commission. Through these efforts, the ESF+ strives to break the cycle of poverty and provide every child with equal opportunities, a crucial aspect for the effective implementation of the Child Guarantee, particularly in regions like Sicily.

    • [1] https://commission.europa.eu/business-economy-euro/economic-recovery/recovery-and-resilience-facility/country-pages/italys-recovery-and-resilience-plan_en.
    • [2] Plan for the extension of full-time under Mission 4, Component 1.
    • [3] The Council Implementing Decision (CID) does not envisage a specific distribution of such structures across Italian regions. It is therefore within the Member State’s remit to decide the allocation of such structures over the national territory.
    • [4] M4C1-21, part of the 10th payment request: ‘At least 1 000 structures are built or upgraded to facilitate the extension of school time and the opening of schools to the territory beyond school hours’.
    • [5] ESO 4.5 ‘Improving the quality, inclusiveness, effectiveness and labour market relevance of education and training systems, including through the validation of non-formal and informal learning, to support the acquisition of key competences, including entrepreneurial and digital skills, and promoting the introduction of dual training systems and apprenticeships (ESF+)’.
    • [6] Avviso 10/2023: https://www.sicilia-fse.it/avvisi-e-bandi/pr-fse-2021-2027/avviso-10-2023.
    • [7] EUR 9 million annually for three consecutive school years 2023-24, 2024-25 and 2025-26.
    • [8] On top of this specific allocation for Sicily, the ESF+ national programmes ‘Social inclusion’ and ‘School and skills’ also contribute to the Child Guarantee across Italy, including in Sicily.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Addressing medicine shortages by reassessing the revised Urban Wastewater Directive – E-001335/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD)[1] requires the removal of micropollutants from urban wastewaters with quaternary treatment.

    The Polluter-Pays Principle[2] is enshrined in Article 191 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. The European Court of Auditors[3] recommended strengthening the integration of this principle into environmental legislation.

    The UWWTD refers to it[4] and provides for an extended producer responsibility system (EPR) whereby the pharmaceutical and cosmetics sectors, which represent the main source of micropollutants in urban wastewater[5], finance at least 80% of the quaternary treatment costs.

    The impact assessment accompanying the Commission’s proposal assessed the cost of such extended producer responsibility system and its impact[6] on the pharmaceutical sector at EU level.

    In addition, as announced in the Water Resilience Strategy[7] of 4 June 2025, in the context of the implementation of the extended producer responsibility, the Commission will conduct an updated study of costs and its potential impacts on concerned sectors.

    In addition, the Commission will continue to support Member States in the pragmatic design of national systems with a view to avoiding unexpected or unintended consequences, in particular for the availability and affordability of medicines.

    • [1] Directive (EU) 2024/3019 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2024 concerning urban wastewater treatment (recast), OJ L, 2024/3019, 12.12.2024.
    • [2] https://environment.ec.europa.eu/economy-and-finance/ensuring-polluters-pay_en.
    • [3] https://www.eca.europa.eu/en/publications/SR21_12.
    • [4] Article 1 of Directive (EU) 2024/3019.
    • [5] Impact assessment accompanying the proposal for a directive concerning urban wastewater treatment (recast): https://environment.ec.europa.eu/publications/proposal-revised-urban-wastewater-treatment-directive_en.
    • [6] Ibid.
    • [7] https://commission.europa.eu/topics/environment/water-resilience-strategy_en.
    Last updated: 27 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Addressing medicine shortages by reassessing the revised Urban Wastewater Directive – E-001335/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD)[1] requires the removal of micropollutants from urban wastewaters with quaternary treatment.

    The Polluter-Pays Principle[2] is enshrined in Article 191 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. The European Court of Auditors[3] recommended strengthening the integration of this principle into environmental legislation.

    The UWWTD refers to it[4] and provides for an extended producer responsibility system (EPR) whereby the pharmaceutical and cosmetics sectors, which represent the main source of micropollutants in urban wastewater[5], finance at least 80% of the quaternary treatment costs.

    The impact assessment accompanying the Commission’s proposal assessed the cost of such extended producer responsibility system and its impact[6] on the pharmaceutical sector at EU level.

    In addition, as announced in the Water Resilience Strategy[7] of 4 June 2025, in the context of the implementation of the extended producer responsibility, the Commission will conduct an updated study of costs and its potential impacts on concerned sectors.

    In addition, the Commission will continue to support Member States in the pragmatic design of national systems with a view to avoiding unexpected or unintended consequences, in particular for the availability and affordability of medicines.

    • [1] Directive (EU) 2024/3019 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2024 concerning urban wastewater treatment (recast), OJ L, 2024/3019, 12.12.2024.
    • [2] https://environment.ec.europa.eu/economy-and-finance/ensuring-polluters-pay_en.
    • [3] https://www.eca.europa.eu/en/publications/SR21_12.
    • [4] Article 1 of Directive (EU) 2024/3019.
    • [5] Impact assessment accompanying the proposal for a directive concerning urban wastewater treatment (recast): https://environment.ec.europa.eu/publications/proposal-revised-urban-wastewater-treatment-directive_en.
    • [6] Ibid.
    • [7] https://commission.europa.eu/topics/environment/water-resilience-strategy_en.
    Last updated: 27 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Planned antimony mining in Chios and compliance with European environmental legislation – E-001718/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    Although the project is still in a planning phase, it is essential to ensure that all necessary assessments and evaluations are conducted to determine its potential impacts on the environment and local communities.

    According to Article 4 of the Environmental Impact Assessment Directive[1], prior to granting a consent for such projects, it is up to Member States to determine whether an environmental impact assessment is necessary, based on a case-by-case analysis or by setting specific criteria (such as the location, size or type of project).

    Such an assessment, if required, needs to take into account the impacts of the projects on cultural heritage and the environmental aspects as well as the opinion of the local community concerned.

    In case a project impacts a Natura 2000 site, Article 6(3) of the Habitats Directive[2] applies[3].

    Projects should be planned and implemented covering all aspects of sustainability[4], including ensuring environmental protection and the prevention and minimisation of adverse social or health effects.

    Without prejudice to the Commission’s role as guardian of the Treaties, Member States are primarily responsible for ensuring compliance with EU law.

    In line with its strategic approach on enforcement action[5], which focuses on cases of systemic non-compliance, the Commission considers that the means of redress available under national legislation would be the most appropriate mechanism to address individual cases of possible non-compliance.

    • [1] Environmental Impact Assessment Directive 2011/92/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment, OJ L 26, 28.1.2012, p. 1-21, as amended by Directive 2014/52/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014, OJ L 124, 25.4.2014, p. 1-18.
    • [2] Council Directive 92/43/EEC on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora, OJ L 206, 22.7.1992, p. 7-50.
    • [3] Article 6(3) requires that any plan or project likely to significantly impact the site, individually or combined with others, undergo an appropriate assessment of its implications, considering the site’s conservation objectives, and can only be approved if it does not adversely affect the site’s integrity. Exceptions are allowed under Article 6(4)’s conditions.
    • [4] As highlighted in the Commission’s publication ‘EU principles for sustainable raw materials https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/23e4b6a0-41da-11ec-89db-01aa75ed71a1/language-en.
    • [5] As set out in the communication of 19 January 2017 (EU law: Better results through better application — C/2016/8600, OJ C 18, 19.1.2017, p. 10-20) and in the communication of 13 October 2022 COM(2022) 518 final — Enforcing EU law for a Europe that delivers.
    Last updated: 27 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Briefing – A new Culture Compass for Europe – 27-06-2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Europe’s culture and cultural heritage are fundamental to EU values and identity, providing space for discussion, engagement and debate. Culture also fosters a European sense of belonging and social cohesion, strengthens communities, and drives innovation and economic competitiveness. The New European Agenda for Culture, which has provided a framework for EU cultural policy since 2018, has become outdated in light of the significant challenges currently facing culture. To address this gap, the priorities of the Commissioner for Intergenerational Fairness, Youth, Culture and Sport, Glenn Micallef, include the development of an overarching, coherent and ambitious strategic framework for culture. This framework, called a new Culture Compass for Europe, is expected to provide long-term direction for diverse cultural aspects in EU policymaking and to ensure that culture becomes more accessible to all. The Culture Compass can be seen as a new policy approach that places culture at the centre of EU policies, serving as a driver for democracy, security, competitiveness, societal resilience, innovation and international partnerships. The European Parliament has played a crucial role in advancing discussions on culture at the EU level. Parliament has called on the Commission to strengthen EU support for building more crisis-resilient creative and cultural sectors and to provide adequate funding for EU-wide programmes promoting culture.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Kustoff, TN Delegation Introduce Resolution to Honor FedEx Founder Frederick W. Smith

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative David Kustoff (TN-08)

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — Today, Congressman David Kustoff (R-TN) and the entire Tennessee House Delegation introduced a Resolution in the House of Representatives to honor the founder, chairman, and CEO of FedEx Corporation, Frederick W. Smith. 

    “I am pleased to introduce this Resolution to honor the Founder of FedEx, Fred Smith, in the House of Representatives,” said Congressman Kustoff. “Under his leadership, FedEx grew into a global enterprise: revolutionizing international supply chains, transforming how businesses operate, and changing how people connect. However, he will be remembered as not just a titan of industry, but as a lifelong Memphian who dedicated his life to giving back to his community. With this Resolution, we honor and celebrate Fred’s lifetime of inspiring service and leadership.”

    The Resolution was cosponsored by Reps. Diana Harshbarger (TN-01), Tim Burchett (TN-02), Chuck Fleischmann (TN-03), Scott DesJarlais (TN-04), Andy Ogles (TN-05), John Rose (TN-06), Mark Green (TN-07), and Steve Cohen (TN-09).
     

    Click here to read the full text of the resolution. 

     

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Security: Former Santa Cruz County Treasurer Sentenced to 10 Years in Prison for Stealing Over $38 Million in County Funds

    Source: US FBI

    TUCSON, Ariz. – Elizabeth Gutfahr, 63 of Rio Rico, Arizona, was sentenced on June 23, 2025, by United States District Judge Rosemary C. Márquez to 120 months in prison, followed by three years of supervised release. Gutfahr previously pleaded guilty to Embezzlement by a Public Official, Money Laundering, and Tax Evasion. Gutfahr was also ordered to pay approximately $51.8 million in restitution to Santa Cruz County and the United States Treasury.

    “The people of Santa Cruz County and all Arizonans have a right to expect their elected leaders to serve with integrity and in the best interest of their constituents,” said U.S. Attorney Timothy Courchaine. “Ms. Gutfahr stole more than money from the people of her county, she betrayed the confidence of the voters who elected her. This sentence shows that abuse of public trust will be punished.”

    “Ms. Gutfahr will now be held accountable for using her official position for huge financial gain at the expense of the residents of Santa Cruz County,” said FBI Phoenix Special Agent in Charge Heith Janke. “Each act of greed and dishonor negatively affected fundamental aspects of the county’s operations. The FBI continues to investigate public corruption cases, and we remain committed to identifying and pursuing those who violate the public’s trust.”

    “Ms. Gutfahr violated her sworn duty by enriching herself with the public money she was entrusted to protect,” said Special Agent in Charge Carissa Messick of the IRS Criminal Investigation Phoenix Field Office. “Taxpayers deserve to know that their elected leaders are working in the community’s best interest — not just their own. IRS-CI remains committed to rooting out corruption at every level.”

    According to court documents, Gutfahr, who served as Santa Cruz County Treasurer from 2012 through 2024, embezzled and laundered approximately $38.7 million by wiring public funds from Santa Cruz County’s account to accounts in the names of fake companies she had created that performed no legitimate business. Gutfahr then used the money to purchase real estate, to renovate her family ranch, to pay expenses for her cattle business, and to buy at least 20 vehicles.

    Gutfahr’s 10-year scheme involved approximately 187 wire transfers, which she was able to complete by undermining the two-step approval process required for transfers. Gutfahr used the token of a subordinate Santa Cruz County employee so that she could both initiate and approve the wire transfers. To cover up the scheme, Gutfahr falsified accounting records, cash reconciliation records, and reports of the County’s investment accounts, thereby hiding the millions of dollars that she had stolen from Santa Cruz County. Gutfahr also failed to report any of the stolen funds as income for tax purposes.

    The FBI and IRS-CI conducted the investigation in this case. Assistant U.S. Attorney Jane L. Westby for the District of Arizona and Senior Litigation Counsel Nicholas W. Cannon of the Criminal Division’s Public Integrity Section handled the prosecution.

    CASE NUMBER:           24-CR-08132-TUC-RM
    RELEASE NUMBER:    2025-098_Gutfahr

    # # #

    For more information on the U.S. Attorney’s Office, District of Arizona, visit http://www.justice.gov/usao/az/
    Follow the U.S. Attorney’s Office, District of Arizona, on Twitter @USAO_AZ for the latest news.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: FBI Announces Reward in Search for Fugitive Miguel Angel Aguilar Ojeda

    Source: US FBI

    Today, the FBI announced a reward of up to $25,000 for information leading to the location and arrest of Miguel Angel Aguilar Ojeda, who is wanted for allegedly killing his wife on October 27, 2024, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

    On October 30, 2024, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, County of Philadelphia, issued an arrest warrant for Ojeda after he was charged with murder, possessing instruments of crime, abuse of corpse, and tampering with evidence.

    On November 21, 2024, a federal arrest warrant was issued for Ojeda in the U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, after he was charged with unlawful flight to avoid prosecution.

    Ojeda has tattoos on both of his wrists, including the name “Miguelito” in black script with a yellow crown on his right wrist. He has ties to Camden, New Jersey; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and Mexico.

    Ojeda should be considered armed and dangerous.

    If you have any information concerning this person, please contact your local FBI office or the nearest American Embassy or Consulate. Tips can also be submitted online at tips.fbi.gov.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: Federal Inmate Sentenced to an Additional Five Years for Fatal Stabbing of Fellow Inmate

    Source: US FBI

    TERRE HAUTE— Otha Don Watkins III, 43, of Cairo, Illinois has been sentenced to five years in federal prison after pleading guilty to involuntary manslaughter and possessing contraband in prison.

    According to court documents, in April of 2023, Otha Watkins was an inmate at the Federal Correctional Complex in Terre Haute, Indiana, serving a 23-year sentence for aiding and abetting armed bank robbery, possession of a stolen firearm, and conspiracy to commit robbery. While in prison, Watkins obtained a piece of metal, sharpened to a point on one end and wrapped with white cloth on the other. This object, commonly known as a “prison shank” is classified as prohibited because it is a weapon or designed or intended to be used as a weapon.

    On April 14, 2023, Watkins was assigned to Unit D-2 of the USP. Inmate Carlos Shelton (“Shelton”) was assigned to the same unit. That day, Watkins and Shelton met on a tier in the unit and began fighting, both armed with improvised shanks. During the course of the fight, Watkins fatally stabbed Shelton in the chest, damaging arteries associated with the heart and lungs. The stab wound led to a massive hemothorax. Shelton died on April 14, 2023.

    “Given Otha Watkins’ history of violent offenses, culminating in the brutal attack he carried out in the Terre Haute prison, it’s evident that he should never be allowed to live outside federal custody again,” said John E. Childress, Acting United States Attorney for the Southern District of Indiana. “I commend the FBI and our federal prosecutor for their tireless efforts to ensure this defendant faces justice. I hope that the conclusion of this case provides some sense of closure and peace to Mr. Shelton’s family.”

    “Today’s sentencing marks the conclusion of a senseless act of violence that took place within the walls of our correctional institution,” said a Bureau of Prisons Spokesperson. “Otha Watkins demonstrated an utter disregard for human life and the rule of law. The court’s decision affirms that such actions carry severe consequences, and it sends a clear and resounding message: acts of violence in federal prison will be met with the full weight of the law.”

    “This brutal killing is a reminder that violence can occur anywhere, even within the confines of the most secure environments,” said FBI Indianapolis Special Agent in Charge Timothy J. O’Malley. “The FBI and our partners are committed to protecting all individuals, regardless of their incarceration status, and we will continue to work to ensure those who commit violent acts while incarcerated, are held fully accountable.”

    The FBI and Bureau of Prisons investigated this case. The sentence was imposed by U.S. District Court Judge James R. Sweeney II. 

    Acting U.S. Attorney Childress thanked Assistant U.S. Jayson W. McGrath, who prosecuted this case.

    ###

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: Nine Members of 36th and Penn “Big Sip” Drug Trafficking Organization Indicted on Fentanyl Conspiracy and Firearms Charges

    Source: United States Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Explosives (ATF)

    MINNEAPOLIS – Nine defendants have been indicted on federal fentanyl and firearms charges for their involvement in the “Big Sip Drug Trafficking Organization (DTO)” — a violent drug trafficking organization that that sold out of at least five apartment buildings near the intersection of 36th Avenue North and North Penn Avenue in Minneapolis, announced Acting U.S. Attorney Joseph H. Thompson.

    “Today marks the federal takedown of yet another dangerous criminal organization. And we will not stop,” said Acting U.S. Attorney Joseph H. Thompson. “The Big Sip drug trafficking organization wreaked havoc at 36th and Penn, bringing guns, violence, and deadly fentanyl to neighborhood apartment buildings. The law abiding people of Minneapolis deserve better. I am proud of the federal, state, and local team that came together to protect the neighborhood from this fentanyl trafficking organization.”

    According to court documents,Larry McGee, 42, Danielle Robberstad, 35, Maurice Montgomery, 31, Dameon Collins, 24, Marcus Lucious, 53, Romell Vann, 22, Bobby Nolan, 43, and Jeremy Lucious, 35, all are members of a drug trafficking organization (“DTO”) known as the “Big Sip DTO,” a high-volume fentanyl sales operation that sold out of at least five apartment buildings near the intersection of 36th Avenue North and North Penn Avenue in Minneapolis. The Big Sip DTO’s operation contributed to crime in the area, including shootings, homicides, and drug use, from August 2023 through June 2025. The defendants were indicted for a Conspiracy to Distribute Fentanyl in violation of Title 21 United States Code, Sections 841(a)(1) and 846. Three defendants, Montgomery, Collins, and Vann, were also indicted for Possessing Firearms in Furtherance of Drug Trafficking, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 924(c).  Seven defendants made their initial appearnces today and are all detained pending further proceedings.  An eighth defendant will make his initial appearance tomorrow. A ninth defendant remains under seal.  The defendants all face up to life in prison.

    According to court documents, the Big Sip DTO originated in the summer of 2023, led and operated by defendants McGee and Robberstad, who are husband and wife. The Big Sip DTO was an efficient sales operation with defined roles. At the top, McGee led the organization. He obtained and stored the fentanyl product, collected proceeds, and managed other members of the organization. Robberstad was a co-leader of the organization. Robberstad maintained the apartments used for fentanyl storage and sales, interacted with customers, provided vehicles for use by the organization members, and managed other members’ sales.

    Defendants Montgomery, Collins, M. Lucious, Vann, Nolan, and J. Lucious were also members of the Big Sip DTO. These defendants all sold fentanyl on behalf of the organization to users at the apartments controlled by the Big Sip DTO. Montgomery was responsible for collecting and transporting the profits of the fentanyl sales to McGee. Montgomery, as well as Collins and Vann, all possessed firearms to protect their product and sale activities.

    “Time and again, violent drug trafficking rings try to take root in our communities, bringing with them illegal guns, violence, and fear,” said ATF Special Agent in Charge Travis Riddle, of the St. Paul Field Division. “As soon as these organizations surface, ATF, along with our law enforcement partners, will be there to dismantle their operations and hold them accountable. We will not allow armed criminal groups to threaten the safety and future of the Twin Cities.”

    “This operation disrupted a violent drug trafficking network that was funneling narcotics, including deadly fentanyl, to the streets,” said Special Agent in Charge Alvin M. Winston Sr. of FBI Minneapolis. “These drugs and the criminals who traffic them, bring death, sorrow, and fear to our communities.  As this coordinated operation demonstrates, those who poison and terrorize the public will face justice. The FBI and our partners will stop at nothing to pursue and apprehend these dangerous offenders and protect our communities.”

    “For too long, 36th and Penn has been a hotspot for violent crime,” said Chief O’Hara. “In 2024, there were four times as many shooting victims within a one block radius of 36th and Penn than the previous three-year average. Overall violent crime more than doubled within a one-block radius of 36th and Penn. We’ve seen the spike in violent crime and heard the concerns loud and clear from the community. Inspector Charlie Adams and the officers of the Fourth Precinct have been working closely with residents to address those concerns, while our investigators have pursued long-term strategies to bring relief. I’m incredibly grateful to the dedicated MPD personnel and to our local and federal partners who supported this investigation. I’m hopeful these arrests and charges will deliver an immediate impact and help restore a sense of safety for everyone who lives and works near 36th and Penn.”

    “These defendants are suspected of some of the worst crimes wreaking havoc on our community. I want to thank all law enforcement agencies for their work on this case including the Hennepin County Sheriff’s Office Criminal Intelligence Division and Violent Offender Task Force. These units provided intelligence throughout the case, carried out search warrants, targeted traffic stops, K9 operations, and much more to bring down these defendants and damage the criminal organization. We must stop those harming our neighbors, friends, and family and part of that work includes stopping the source,” said Dawanna Witt, Sheriff of Hennepin County.

    This case is the result of an investigation conducted by the ATF, FBI, Minneapolis Police Department, and the Hennepin County Sheriff’s Office.

    Assistant U.S. Attorney William C. Mattessich is prosecuting the case.

    An indictment is merely an allegation, and the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law. 

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: Las Vegas Jury Convicts Woman for Threats Against Two Federal Judges and Her Probation Officer; San Diego Trial Team Prosecuted the Case in the District of Nevada

    Source: US FBI

    LAS VEGAS – A federal jury has convicted Latonia Smith of cyberstalking and threatening two district court judges and a probation officer, all of whom were involved in her previous federal conviction for death threats she made against lawyers in yet another case.

    In the current case, after a six-day trial and less than one day of deliberation, a jury found that Smith threatened U.S. District Judge Richard Franklin Boulware, who presided over Smith’s 2021 trial and sentenced her to 36 months in prison for that offense. The jury also found that Smith targeted U.S. District Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey, who presided over the defendant’s supervised release, and Shawn Mummey, her probation officer.

    At the time of the grand jury’s indictment in the current matter, Smith was on supervised release from that previous federal 2021 conviction. In that case, Smith targeted corporate lawyers involved in defending the 2017 firing of her mother from her job as a guest room attendant at the Planet Hollywood Hotel and Casino in Las Vegas after she allegedly took a small amount of money from a guest’s room.

    “All of these victims felt threatened and emotionally distressed. They then took steps to protect themselves and their families,” said U.S. Attorney Adam Gordon for the Southern District of California. “Threats directed at members of the judiciary are not only criminal acts, but direct attacks on the rule of law. Intimidation of judges and court personnel erodes public trust and threatens the fair administration of justice for all.”

    “The FBI takes threats of violence very seriously and works diligently to protect the communities we serve,” said Rafik Mattar, Acting Special Agent in Charge of the FBI in Las Vegas, “We will not tolerate threats of violence to any member of our community, particularly those dedicated to safeguarding our democratic process. The defendant’s actions were dangerous and unacceptable. We will continue to work with our law enforcement partners to disrupt and investigate those who engage in violent rhetoric—ensuring accountability for anyone who threatens to harass, intimidate, or harm others.”

    When Smith was released from federal prison in the first case against her, she was sent to Washoe County jail to face allegations related to an October 31, 2019, armed home-invasion in Reno she allegedly committed against another lawyer involved in the Planet Hollywood case.

    Smith was granted bail in early June 2022. Upon her return to Las Vegas, Smith immediately began searching Google for information about Judge Boulware along with his wife, Las Vegas City Councilwoman Nancy Brune, and their family. At the same time, she googled “judges should die.”

    Over the next several weeks, the defendant became increasingly frustrated with judges and anyone involved with her prior federal case. On June 23, 2022, the defendant emailed her probation officer and explained, “Some good advice: Life is short, society should be careful who they piss off.” Below the warning, the defendant sent a link to a YouTube video showing a six-minute compilation of cell phone videos from the October 1 mass shooting at the Mandalay Bay Hotel.

    Over the next few days, Smith sent a series of emails. Some threatened a mass casualty event: “LET THE SHOW BEGIN. NEVADA IS GOING TO LOVE THIS!!!!”  Some were designed to let victims know their loved ones were in jeopardy: “LETS KEEP [YOUR KIDS] IN FOCUS”.

    Throughout many of the emails, the defendant made it clear that she had deeply researched the recipients of her threats, accurately identifying where they could be found, either during hobby activities, or in their actual homes. For example, to Judge Jennifer Dorsey the defendant wrote: “Tell Jennifer, Henderson is nice I see why she chose that area. Lots of shops nearby. Smart.” At trial, Judge Dorsey testified that the defendant’s identification of her personal residence inspired her to immediately sell her home and move.

    The victims of Smith’s threats testified at trial they were frightened and believed Smith was capable of violently acting on her threats as she had allegedly done in the pending case regarding the armed home invasion targeting the lawyer in Reno.

    U.S. District Judge Gloria Navarro reported Smith’s threats to U.S. Marshals, who protect the federal judiciary. Judge Navarro testified at the trial, telling the jury that she recognized the danger posed by the defendant and immediately took action.  “I emailed the chief of probation; anybody I could get a hold of to prevent a tragedy…I didn’t want to die. I didn’t want my family to die.  I didn’t want my coworkers to die.” The Marshals then contacted the FBI.

    After two special agents from the FBI interviewed the Smith on June 27, 2022, she was immediately taken into custody, where she has remained. During the interview, when asked what she was thinking about when she was researching mass shooters, Smith responded: “I think what they were thinking.”

    The investigation found that Smith, who has a biochemistry degree from the University of Nevada Las Vegas, Googled phrases like “judges die,” “how to become a bomb maker,” “how to be a mass shooter,” “buying a gun,” and “ar 15 for sale.” She also watched the compilation of videos from the October 1 mass shooting 13 times over a three-week period.  At the same time, the defendant repeatedly searched the names of her targets, some of their children, and some of their home addresses. The jury deliberated for less than a day before returning a guilty verdict on three counts of cyberstalking for the emails sent to Judges Dorsey and Boulware, along with her probation officer. The jury acquitted the defendant on the other two counts of cyberstalking.

    The defendant will remain in custody pending sentencing, on a date yet to be determined.

    The trial took place in the federal courthouse in Las Vegas. The presiding judge was Senior District Court Judge Michael W. Mosman, from the District of Oregon. Judge Mosman was appointed to preside over the case by special designation of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.

    Smith’s prosecution was initiated by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Nevada, out of their office in Reno.  In March 2024, the Department of Justice recused the entire U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Nevada and had the prosecution reassigned.

    This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Andrew Haden and Francisco Nagel for the Southern District of California, both of whom were named Special Assistant U.S. Attorneys in Las Vegas after the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Nevada was recused.

    DEFENDANT                                                Case Number 22CR051-MWM                              

    Latonia Dyshawna Smith                               Age: 31                       Las Vegas, NV

    SUMMARY OF CHARGES

    Three Counts of Cyberstalking – Title 18, U.S.C., Sections 2261A

    Maximum penalty: Five years in prison, as to each count of conviction

    INVESTIGATING AGENCIES

    Federal Bureau of Investigation

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: Continuity planning empowers businesses to adapt, recover, and thrive

    Source: UNISDR Disaster Risk Reduction

    Businesses often struggle to recover from extreme weather events and natural hazards because they are not ready. 

    It has been estimated that 40% of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) do not reopen after a disaster and many of those that do, fail within a year. Businesses need to rethink their operating models before disruptions happen. Yet building disaster resilience does not always have to require a resource intensive process or lead to something new.  It does not mean changing what a business does, but how it does it. This is where business continuity planning comes in.

    A business continuity plan (BCP) outlines what is needed for a business to continue operating or resume operations after a disruption. It serves as a guide for pivoting operations if and as needed. Yet according to some estimates, only 20-30% of SMEs have written BCPs in place.

    In partnership with local governments, chambers of commerce and ARISE networks, UNDRR is implementing a project in Barcelona (Spain), Bridgetown (Barbados) and Sendai (Japan) to support SMEs in developing and testing business continuity plans to strengthen their disaster resilience. Early lessons are already emerging. 

    Here are five noteworthy things about business continuity planning that further highlight its importance:

    Business continuity plans can separate those that recover from those that do not

    With the increasing frequency and intensity of disasters, preparation is no longer optional. It makes all the difference. In many parts of the world, the question is not whether but when the next extreme weather event or natural hazard will strike. What businesses do today will determine how they fare in the face of a disaster tomorrow. A systemic approach to developing a BCP – conducting even quick multi-hazard risk assessments, identifying critical functions, outlining response and communications protocols, assigning roles, and stress-testing the plan – outline a clear roadmap that enables faster, risk informed decision-making and more effective resource allocation. Those without BCPs will inevitably face more chaos, operational delays, and significant losses – many times leading to business closure. Businesses that are risk-aware, with tested and up-to-date BCPs, however, are able to absorb shocks better, pivot operations, recover faster and become more resilient.  

    Business continuity plans are cost-effective mitigation measures

    Business continuity plans are a quick, low-cost way to mitigate potentially high-impact disaster risks. They typically require low financial investment especially when compared against the potentially significant losses of being unprepared for disasters. This is particularly true for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) that often do not have the resources – human or financial – for developing more holistic disaster risk reduction approaches or undertaking disaster recovery efforts.

    Business continuity plans are a mechanism to operationalize resilience

    While resilience encompasses more than just business continuity, a well prepared BCP provides the foundation for reducing organizational vulnerabilities, pivoting operations and building resilient recovery capabilities. They clarify roles and actions that are needed to continue operations or resume quickly after a disruption. While resilience may be the ultimate goal, business continuity planning represents the practical steps to achieve it.

    Business continuity plans can offer a strategic advantage during uncertainty

    Business continuity plans can significantly enhance a company’s competitiveness and safeguard long-term success during disruptions. Those that have BCPs – and have tested and updated them regularly – are in a better position to minimize downtime and continue or quickly resume their operations. They are better equipped to protect their physical assets and data, while also retaining customers as well as contributing to the resilience of the communities where they operate. The operational flexibility – agility and ability to adapt to changing circumstances – can even help in capturing more market share.

    Business continuity plans can improve financial reserves

    Limited access to finance and no or inadequate insurance coverage are often cited among the key reasons why SMEs do not recover from disasters. Partners want to ensure that their supply chains and services are not disrupted, investors and lenders are keen to protect their capital, and insurers want to minimize payouts. A robust BCP can help improve financial cushioning by providing a form of assurance that operations will continue. As operational and financial risks are lowered, the business becomes a more stable, and thus attractive investment. Business continuity planning can also improve insurability: turning the business into a lower-risk policyholder, potentially leading to better policy terms and/or lower insurance premiums. In general, BCPs signal commitment to proactivity, stability and sustainability – making the business more credible and trustworthy in the eyes of all key stakeholders.

    To support businesses in understanding their resilience capacities, UNDRR has also developed the Resilience Maturity Assessment Tool (ReMA). ReMA helps businesses – particularly SMEs – identify gaps in their disaster preparedness and assess the maturity of their resilience strategies, offering a structured path toward stronger continuity planning and risk governance.

    Business continuity planning is more than a safeguard – it’s a strategic choice that empowers businesses to adapt, recover, and thrive amid disruption.

    MIL OSI United Nations News