Category: AM-NC

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Briefing – The UN High Level Political Forum on Sustainable Development 14-23 July 2025, New York – 24-06-2025

    Source: European Parliament

    The purpose of this briefing is to provide support to the European Parliament delegation to the 13th session of the United Nations High-Level Political Forum on Sustainable Development, taking place 14-23 July 2025 at the United Nations (UN) Headquarters, under the auspices of the UN Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC). The briefing provides an overview of the progress made on the SDG implementation by the global community and the EU, as well as key issues at stake in the meeting. This document was provided by the Policy Department for Transformation, Innovation and Health at the request of the Committee on on the Environment, Climate and Food Safety (ENVI).

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Draft agenda – Tuesday, 8 July 2025 – Strasbourg

    Source: European Parliament

    Draft agenda
    Strasbourg
    Monday, 7 July 2025 – Thursday, 10 July 2025  
    Tuesday, 8 July 2025   Version: Tuesday, 24 June 2025, 15:29

    09:00 – 10:30   Debate      

    10:30 – 11:50   Debate      
    26   Presentation of the programme of activities of the Danish Presidency
    Council and Commission statements
    [2025/2538(RSP)]

    12:00 – 13:00   VOTES      
    3   (possibly) Votes on requests for urgent procedure (Rule 170)
    54 * Bulgaria’s adoption of the euro on 1 January 2026
    Report:  Eva Maydell
    [COM(2025)0304 – C10-0110/2025 – 2025/0158(NLE)]
    Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs
    Expected date of adoption: 24/06
    55 ***I The role of gas storage for securing gas supplies ahead of the winter season
    Report:  Borys Budka (A10-0079/2025)
    Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2017/1938 as regards the role of gas storage for securing gas supplies ahead of the winter season
    [COM(2025)0099 – C10-0041/2025 – 2025/0051(COD)]
    Committee on Industry, Research and Energy
    39 ***I Temporary derogation from certain provisions of Regulations (EU) 2017/2226 and (EU) 2016/399
    Report:  Assita Kanko (A10-0082/2025)
    Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on a temporary derogation from certain provisions of Regulation (EU) 2017/2226 and Regulation (EU) 2016/399 as regards a progressive start of operations of the Entry/Exit System
    [COM(2024)0567 – C10-0207/2024 – 2024/0315(COD)]
    Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
    61 * VAT: taxable persons, special scheme and special arrangements for declaration and payment, relating to distance sales of imported goods
    Report:  Ľudovít Ódor
    Report on the proposal for a Council directive amending Directive 2006/112/EC as regards VAT rules relating to taxable persons who facilitate distance sales of imported goods and the application of the special scheme for distance sales of goods imported from third territories or third countries and special arrangements for declaration and payment of import VAT
    [COM(2023)026208710/2025 – C9-0174/2023 C10-0084/2025 – 2023/0158(CNS)]
    Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs
    24 *** EU-Greenland and Denmark Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement: Implementing Protocol 2025-2030
    Recommendation:  Emma Fourreau (A10-0099/2025)
    Recommendation on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Implementing Protocol (2025-2030) to the Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Government of Greenland and the Government of Denmark
    [COM(2024)047914652/2024 –  C10-0227/2024 – 2024/0263(NLE)]
    Committee on Fisheries
    30   EU-Greenland and Denmark Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement: Implementing Protocol 2025-2030 (Resolution)
    Report:  Emma Fourreau (A10-0103/2025)
    Report containing a motion for a non-legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Implementing Protocol (2025-2030) to the Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Government of Greenland and the Government of Denmark
    [2024/0263M(NLE)]
    Committee on Fisheries
    32 *** EU-Kyrgyz Republic Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement
    Recommendation:  Nacho Sánchez Amor (A10-0105/2025)
    Recommendation on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Kyrgyz Republic, of the other part
    [10724/2022COM(2022)0277 – C10-0057/2024  – 2022/0184(NLE)]
    Committee on Foreign Affairs
    31   EU-Kyrgyz Republic Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (Resolution)
    Report:  Nacho Sánchez Amor (A10-0111/2025)
    Report containing a motion for a non-legislative resolution on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Kyrgyz Republic, of the other part
    [2022/0184M(NLE)]
    Committee on Foreign Affairs
    44   Security of energy supply in the EU
    Report:  Beata Szydło
    [2025/2055(INI)]
    Committee on Industry, Research and Energy
    Expected date of adoption: 25/06
    4   Texts on which debate is closed

    55 The role of gas storage for securing gas supplies ahead of the winter season
    Borys Budka (A10-0079/2025
        Amendments; rejection Wednesday, 2 July 2025, 13:00
    39 Temporary derogation from certain provisions of Regulations (EU) 2017/2226 and (EU) 2016/399
    Assita Kanko (A10-0082/2025
        Amendments; rejection Wednesday, 2 July 2025, 13:00
    61 VAT: taxable persons, special scheme and special arrangements for declaration and payment, relating to distance sales of imported goods
    Ľudovít Ódor
        (if requested) Amendments Wednesday, 2 July 2025, 13:00
    30 EU-Greenland and Denmark Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement: Implementing Protocol 2025-2030 (Resolution)
    Emma Fourreau (A10-0103/2025
        Amendments Wednesday, 2 July 2025, 13:00
    31 EU-Kyrgyz Republic Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (Resolution)
    Nacho Sánchez Amor (A10-0111/2025) 
        Amendments Wednesday, 2 July 2025, 13:00
    44 Security of energy supply in the EU
    Beata Szydło
        (possibly) Amendments by the rapporteur, 71 MEPs at least; Alternative motions for resolutions Wednesday, 2 July 2025, 13:00
        (possibly) Joint alternative motions for resolutions Thursday, 3 July 2025, 12:00
    22 Public procurement
    Piotr Müller
        (possibly) Amendments Wednesday, 2 July 2025, 13:00
    19 2023 and 2024 reports on Albania
    Andreas Schieder (A10-0106/2025) 
        Amendments Wednesday, 2 July 2025, 13:00
    18 2023 and 2024 reports on Bosnia and Herzegovina
    Ondřej Kolář (A10-0108/2025) 
        Amendments Wednesday, 2 July 2025, 13:00
    46 2023 and 2024 reports on North Macedonia
    Thomas Waitz
        (possibly) Amendments Wednesday, 2 July 2025, 13:00
    17 2023 and 2024 reports on Georgia
    Rasa Juknevičienė (A10-0110/2025) 
        Amendments Wednesday, 2 July 2025, 13:00
    Separate votes – Split votes – Roll-call votes
    Texts put to the vote on Tuesday Friday, 4 July 2025, 12:00
    Texts put to the vote on Wednesday Monday, 7 July 2025, 19:00
    Texts put to the vote on Thursday Tuesday, 8 July 2025, 19:00
    Motions for resolutions concerning debates on cases of breaches of human rights, democracy and the rule of law (Rule 150) Wednesday, 9 July 2025, 19:00

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Draft agenda – Wednesday, 9 July 2025 – Strasbourg

    Source: European Parliament

    25 Amending Regulation (EU) No 1026/2012 on certain measures for the purpose of the conservation of fish stocks in relation to countries allowing non-sustainable fishing
    Thomas Bajada (A10-0070/2025     – Amendments; rejection Wednesday, 2 July 2025, 13:00 48 Draft amending budget no 1/2025: entering the surplus of the financial year 2024
    Victor Negrescu     – (possibly) Amendments Wednesday, 2 July 2025, 13:00 52 Mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund: assistance to Austria, Poland, Czechia, Slovakia and Moldova relating to floods that occurred in September 2024 and Bosnia and Herzegovina relating to floods that occurred in October 2024
    Andrzej Halicki     – (possibly) Amendments Wednesday, 2 July 2025, 13:00 53 Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: Application EGF/2025/000 TA 2025 – Technical assistance at the initiative of the Commission
    Jean-Marc Germain     – (possibly) Amendments Wednesday, 2 July 2025, 13:00 27 Product safety and regulatory compliance in e-commerce and non-EU imports
    Salvatore De Meo     – (possibly) Amendments by the rapporteur, 71 MEPs at least; Alternative motions for resolutions Wednesday, 2 July 2025, 13:00     – (possibly) Joint alternative motions for resolutions Thursday, 3 July 2025, 12:00 60 The human cost of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the urgent need to end Russian aggression: the situation of illegally detained civilians and prisoners of war, and the continued bombing of civilians     – Motions for resolutions Wednesday, 2 July 2025, 13:00     – Amendments to motions for resolutions; joint motions for resolutions Friday, 4 July 2025, 12:00     – Amendments to joint motions for resolutions Friday, 4 July 2025, 13:00 11 Debates on cases of breaches of human rights, democracy and the rule of law (Rule 150)     – Motions for resolutions Monday, 7 July 2025, 20:00     – Amendments to motions for resolutions; joint motions for resolutions (Rule 150) Wednesday, 9 July 2025, 13:00     – Amendments to joint motions for resolutions (Rule 150) Wednesday, 9 July 2025, 14:00 Separate votes – Split votes – Roll-call votes Texts put to the vote on Tuesday Friday, 4 July 2025, 12:00 Texts put to the vote on Wednesday Monday, 7 July 2025, 19:00 Texts put to the vote on Thursday Tuesday, 8 July 2025, 19:00 Motions for resolutions concerning debates on cases of breaches of human rights, democracy and the rule of law (Rule 150) Wednesday, 9 July 2025, 19:00

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Draft agenda – Monday, 7 July 2025 – Strasbourg

    Source: European Parliament

    23 Financial activities of the European Investment Bank – annual report 2024
    Francisco Assis (A10-0112/2025) 
        – Amendments Wednesday, 2 July 2025, 13:00
    Texts put to the vote on Tuesday Friday, 4 July 2025, 12:00
    Texts put to the vote on Wednesday Monday, 7 July 2025, 19:00
    Texts put to the vote on Thursday Tuesday, 8 July 2025, 19:00
    Motions for resolutions concerning debates on cases of breaches of human rights, democracy and the rule of law (Rule 150) Wednesday, 9 July 2025, 19:00

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Draft agenda – Thursday, 10 July 2025 – Strasbourg

    Source: European Parliament

    56 Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 as regards obligations of economic operators concerning battery due diligence policies
    Antonio Decaro     – (possibly) Amendments; rejection Wednesday, 2 July 2025, 13:00 37 Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitiveness
    Hildegard Bentele     – (possibly) Amendments by the rapporteur, 71 MEPs at least; Alternative motions for resolutions Wednesday, 2 July 2025, 13:00     – (possibly) Joint alternative motions for resolutions Thursday, 3 July 2025, 12:00 28 Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political Forum
    Robert Biedroń, Nikolas Farantouris     – Amendments by the rapporteur, 71 MEPs at least, Alternative motions for resolutions Wednesday, 2 July 2025, 13:00     – Joint alternative motions for resolutions Thursday, 3 July 2025, 12:00 Separate votes – Split votes – Roll-call votes Texts put to the vote on Tuesday Friday, 4 July 2025, 12:00 Texts put to the vote on Wednesday Monday, 7 July 2025, 19:00 Texts put to the vote on Thursday Tuesday, 8 July 2025, 19:00 Motions for resolutions concerning debates on cases of breaches of human rights, democracy and the rule of law (Rule 150) Wednesday, 9 July 2025, 19:00

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Highlights – Single Market Strategy – Public Hearing on 25 June 2025 – Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection

    Source: European Parliament

    IMCO committee © European Parliament (2022)

    This public hearing will bring together policymakers, experts and stakeholders to examine the Single Market Strategy, adopted on 21 May 2025 by the European Commission. This strategy aims to strengthen the Single Market by modernising governance, removing barriers, and ensuring consistent implementation across the EU. Renowned academic, former Prime Minister of Italy and former European Commissioner Professor Mario Monti will deliver a keynote speech at this event.

    This new strategy has the intended aim of helping companies scale up and compete globally, as well as enable citizens to fully reap the benefits that a further integrated Single Market offers them in terms of cross-border provision of services and free movement of goods.In that perspective, relevant issues will be addressed, regarding the implementation of the rules, the existing regulatory and administrative barriers, the challenges posed by the current trade tensions and the opportunities that emerge from the promotion of the policies for the Single Market, as a standing pillar of EU interests and core values.These are key issues for the work of the IMCO Committee. This hearing will gather Commission high-level officials, representatives of companies and consumers and academic experts to discuss the actions foreseen in the strategy and state of play and challenges related to the completion of the Single Market. The detailed programme of the hearing is available below.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: At a Glance – Transitioning out of temporary protection for displaced people from Ukraine – 24-06-2025

    Source: European Parliament

    The EU’s temporary protection regime has provided predictability and legal certainty to both displaced people from Ukraine and the EU Member States. The situation in Ukraine, as a result of Russia’s ongoing war of aggression, still requires a common European response. The EU has therefore decided to extend temporary protection for a fifth year, until 4 March 2027. Moreover, the European Commission has proposed a coordinated approach to a smooth transition out of temporary protection, when the circumstances allow.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Digital censorship and content removal by Meta in the EU – E-002118/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002118/2025/rev.1
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Tom Vandendriessche (PfE)

    Over the last few years, a number of citizens and movements in the EU have reported that social media pages have been unilaterally removed or blocked by large tech concerns, including Meta (Facebook/Instagram). In many instances, that is done with no clear statement of reasons, in an untransparent process and with no scope for redress.

    Recently, a Flemish activist publicly shared that Meta removed not only the main communication page of his group (which has more than 40 000 followers), but also a separate page given over to recreational nature walks in Flanders.

    In view of this:

    ​​​​​​​What does the Commission think about the increasing reports of content removal and page blocking by Meta in the EU, especially when such action appears to be targeted at particular ideological or political opinions?

    Submitted: 27.5.2025

    Last updated: 24 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Falling birth rates in the EU and the Commission’s strategic response – E-002332/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002332/2025/rev.1
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Nadine Morano (PPE)

    According to Eurostat data, the fertility rate in the EU reached a historically low level in 2023, with an average of 1.38 children per woman, well below the estimated population replacement threshold of 2.1. The number of births has also been falling, dropping to 3.67 million in 2023, compared to almost 7 million in the 1960s.

    This change is being accompanied by a significant ageing of the population: the median age in the EU was 44.7 in 2024, which poses major challenges for the sustainability of pension and healthcare systems and for economic growth.

    Does the Commission plan to launch a coordinated European strategy to address the demographic challenge, including specific measures to promote birth rates and ensure the sustainability of social systems?

    Submitted: 11.6.2025

    Last updated: 24 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Highlights – ECON – LIBE: Scrutiny of delegated acts and implementing measures – NEW – Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs

    Source: European Parliament

    © Image used under license from Adobe Stock

    On 30 June 2025 from 18:30-20:00, ECON and LIBE Members will exchange views with Maria Luís Albuquerque, Commissioner for Financial Services and the Savings and Investments Union, on the amendment to the delegated regulation in relation to third countries which have strategic deficiencies in their AML/CTF regimes (High-Risk Third Countries).

    Under Article 9 of Directive (EU) 2015/849 (AMLD4), the Commission is mandated to adopt a list of high-risk third countries presenting strategic deficiencies in their anti-money laundering/countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) regimes. The purpose is to protect the EU internal market from risks posed by third countries, by requiring financial institutions and other gatekeepers to apply enhanced vigilance with regard to transactions involving high-risk third countries. This is done through the adoption of the Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675 which is regularly amended. In the context of their scrutiny powers, the co-legislators can object to such delegated acts adopted by the Commission during a one-month scrutiny period (extendable by another one-month period). The European Parliament rejected the last amending to the list of high-risk third countries by its resolution of 23 April 2024. The EU list of high-risk third countries was not amended since then.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Germany: EIB provides €30 million financing to OLEDWorks for automotive lighting

    Source: European Investment Bank

    EIB

    • EIB financing supports OLEDWorks in ramping up the manufacturing and R&D of their lighting technology.
    • The company’s products combine high brightness, longevity, energy-efficiency, and reduced waste. 
    • The loan is backed by the European Commission’s InvestEU programme, which aims to promote sustainable investment, innovation, and job creation in Europe.

    Luxembourg/Aachen, 26 June 2025. – The European Investment Bank (EIB) has granted financing of €30 million to OLEDWorks, a provider of innovative lighting solutions for the automotive industry, microdisplays, and other specialty lighting applications. The loan aims to support the company’s expansion and product development within the European Union, with a primary focus on automotive clients. Most of the investment will be used at the borrower’s existing site in Aachen, Germany.

    OLEDWorks specialises in designing and developing lighting solutions based on organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs). Its technology offers a combination of high brightness, energy efficiency, and durability. Notably, the company has developed an innovative application for OLED panels in the automotive sector, which represents a first-of-its-kind use case at scale.

    The financing provided by the EIB will enable OLEDWorks to strengthen its position as a world leader in multi-stack OLED technology, and to expand its portfolio of automotive customers. It will also allow OLEDWorks to capitalise on the nascent trend of using OLED technologies in the automotive sector, which is expected to gain momentum in the coming years. Furthermore, the financing will help to keep key manufacturing sectors and innovation in Europe, as the lighting industry has largely been delocalised to Asia in recent decades.

    “OLEDWorks provides the type of cutting-edge technology that will secure a bright future for Europe and its people,” said EIB Vice President Nicola Beer, who oversees the Bank’s operations in Germany. “The financing provided by the EIB reflects our commitment to supporting innovative companies in strategic sectors. OLEDWorks’ lighting solutions align with our objective of fostering technological advancements on the continent—progress we need if we want Europe to be competitive and green.”

    David DeJoy, CEO of OLEDWorks, emphasizes the pivotal role this investment plays in meeting customer needs: “The financing provided by the EIB will allow for expedited technology development and will enable advancements of OLED lighting technology with higher segmentation and display-like capabilities, higher brightness for automotive stop and turn applications, and bendable OLED panels.”

    Wolfgang Görgen, Managing Director of OLEDWorks GmbH, adds: ”The technology advancements along with enhanced capacity at our Aachen facility will empower us to respond swiftly to our customers’ demands.”

    The EIB support is expected to facilitate OLEDWorks’ growth plans and enable the hiring of some 45 new employees over the next three to four years. The project falls under the InvestEU-supported Future Tech programme loan, which addresses funding gaps and provides adequate risk capital to venture-backed companies in the EU. European small and mid-sized companies often face challenges in accessing non-dilutive financing options for growth investments. Since its establishment in 2016, the EIB’s innovation financing team has addressed the unique funding needs of over 300 fast-growing companies, investing €7 billion in the process.

    Background information

    About the European Investment Bank

    The European Investment Bank (ElB) is the long-term lending institution of the European Union, owned by its Member States. Built around eight core priorities, we finance investments that contribute to EU policy objectives by bolstering climate action and the environment, digitalisation and technological innovation, security and defence, cohesion, agriculture and bioeconomy, social infrastructure, the capital markets union, and a stronger Europe in a more peaceful and prosperous world. 

    The EIB Group, which also includes the European Investment Fund (EIF), signed nearly €89 billion in new financing for over 900 high-impact projects in 2024, boosting Europe’s competitiveness and security.   

    About OLEDworks

    OLEDWorks is a global leader in the development and production of innovative organic light-emitting diode (OLED) technology. By producing the world’s best-performing OLED panels and combining rapid product innovation, OLEDWorks enriches lighting solutions in automotive, specialty, and microdisplay applications.

    The OLEDWorks manufacturing facility is IATF 16949 and ISO 9001, 14001, 45001 certified with full traceability via a factory MES system.

    About the InvestEU Programme

    The InvestEU programme supports the sustainable recovery of the European Union by leveraging significant private and public funds. It aims to crowd in private investment for strategic priorities such as the European Green Deal and the digital transition. The programme simplifies and enhances funding opportunities for investment projects within the European Union. It consists of the InvestEU Fund, the InvestEU Advisory Hub, and the InvestEU Portal. The InvestEU Fund is implemented through financial partners utilising the EU budget guarantee of €26.2 billion to mobilise at least €372 billion in additional investment.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Agricultural Policy – E-001469/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) payments made to Member States during the current Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF), i.e. in financial years 2021-2024, are listed in the attached table[1].

    While the Commission bears overall responsibility for the financial management of the CAP, most of the CAP budget (around 99.5%) is implemented under ‘shared management’ between the Commission and Member States. In the financial year 2024, 5.7 million farmers received CAP support directly, not counting all other beneficiaries.

    On the second and third questions, Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1475[2] sets out detailed rules for the monitoring and evaluation of the CAP Strategic Plans, including the provision of information from Member States.

    Under this regulation, Member States have to submit data to the Commission on CAP interventions and beneficiaries. The first deadline for data submission was 30 April 2025.

    The Commission is currently conducting quality checks to ensure the accuracy and completeness of data collected. Given the volume of data the Commission estimates that the dataset will be ready for analysis by the fourth quarter of 2025.

    Under the transparency rules for the CAP, Member States publish details of the beneficiaries of CAP payments[3].

    • [1] For more details the Commission refers the Honourable Member to the annual financial reports on the European agricultural guarantee fund (EAGF) and the European agricultural fund for rural development (EAFRD): https://agriculture.ec.europa.eu/common-agricultural-policy/financing-cap/cap-funds/financial-report-eagf-and-eafrd_en.
    • [2] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_impl/2022/1475/oj.
    • [3] https://agriculture.ec.europa.eu/common-agricultural-policy/financing-cap/beneficiaries_en.
    Last updated: 24 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Clarification of whether the principle of reciprocity is consistent with EU law – E-002400/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002400/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Emma Rafowicz (S&D), Hannes Heide (S&D), Bogdan Andrzej Zdrojewski (PPE), Laurence Farreng (Renew), Marcos Ros Sempere (S&D), Milan Zver (PPE), Aurore Lalucq (S&D), Nikos Papandreou (S&D), Sandro Ruotolo (S&D)

    Following the 2020 judgment in the Recorded Artists Actors Performers Ltd case, the European music sector, supported by Parliament, requested clarification of Directive 2006/115/EC. It seeks confirmation of the principle of reciprocity that derives from international treaties, so that Member States may apply a different system, should they wish to do so. The Court of Justice of the European Union highlighted that it was the responsibility of the EU legislator to clarify whether this principle is consistent with EU law.

    Without EU intervention, performing artists, along with very small, small and medium enterprises that produce music in Europe risk having EUR 125 million of their annual revenue transferred to the United States. This is despite the fact that such performers and entities are a catalyst for diversity and European creative talent.

    The EU’s capacity to exert trade pressure on third countries who do not follow EU legal norms is also at stake.

    Clearly, it is even more important for the EU to maintain trade pressure, given the aggressive trade policy pursued by the Trump Administration. Confirming the principle of reciprocity is perfectly in line with the EU’s goal of contributing a fair and balanced response.

    In this context, can the Commission specify its planned schedule for the implementation of this work?

    Submitted: 13.6.2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Deregulation of ESG reporting obligations and protecting small and medium-sized enterprises from excessive administrative burdens – E-002396/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002396/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Piotr Müller (ECR)

    The most recent draft Council position of 29 May 2025 proposes that ESG reporting obligations be significantly limited by, among other things, excluding companies that have fewer than 1 000 employees or an annual turnover of under EUR 450 million and also by banning bigger corporations from requesting ESG data from these entities.

    In this context, we would like to put the following questions to the Commission:

    • 1.Does the Commission agree that the current ESG reporting system – in particular that established by the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive – creates disproportionate administrative burdens and requires real deregulation as opposed to simply superficial changes?
    • 2.Can the Commission clearly indicate which ESG reporting obligations will actually be removed rather than simply delayed or relaxed in a way that would not reduce the actual burden on companies? In particular, are there specific changes planned to the obligations laid down in the European Sustainability Reporting Standards and to the obligation to collect data across the whole value chain, which, in practice, includes smaller companies?
    • 3.Is the Commission considering consolidating ESG reporting regulations into a single coherent legal act in order to limit regulatory fragmentation and the resulting costs for entrepreneurs?

    Submitted: 13.6.2025

    Last updated: 24 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Detailed breakdown of EU funding for nature conservation in Tanzania from 2014 to the present – E-001130/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The EU continues to follow closely the developments concerning the Maasai communities living in the Ngorongoro Conservation Area and in the Loliondo Game Controlled Area.

    As regards the protection of nature and biodiversity, the EU has provided a significant amount of funding for these sectors in Tanzania from 2014 to the present.

    The Commission is sending directly to the Honourable Member a table which includes the currently available information on bilateral programmes relating to nature conservation in Tanzania.

    The table indicates the information relating to each project including titles, adoption year, recipients, objectives, amount of EU contribution, and duration.

    The total amount of EU bilateral funding for nature conservation in Tanzania from 2014 to the present amounts to EUR 95.38 million.

    As regards projects adopted under the 2021-2027 multiannual-indicative programme for Tanzania, detailed documents can be found on the Commission website[1].

    See annex : Annex

    • [1] https://international-partnerships.ec.europa.eu/countries/tanzania_en.
    Last updated: 24 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Press release – Transport MEPs seek to reinforce passenger rights

    Source: European Parliament

    MEPs push for a common reimbursement form, no charge for selecting a child seat, free on-board personal item and small hand luggage and better protection for multimodal journeys.

    On Tuesday, Transport and Tourism Committee proposed changes to EU passenger rights rules by 38 votes to two and two abstentions to close enforcement gaps and make sure passengers are better aware of their rights in the case of travel disruptions.

    Intermediaries

    The draft rules clarify the role of intermediaries (ticket vendors or retailers) in reimbursing air passengers for cancelations, long delays or denied boarding. MEPs want these companies to inform passenger at the time of booking about the full cost of an air ticket, intermediation or service fees, and the reimbursement process, which should not take longer than 14 days. Should an intermediary fail to respect this deadline, it would be up to the air carrier to process the reimbursement within seven days.

    Common form

    MEPs support the proposal to introduce a common form for compensation and reimbursement requests. They also want to add a provision tasking air carriers with sending passengers the pre-filled form, or activate alternative automatic communication channels, within 48 hours following a disruption.

    Extraordinary circumstances

    To reduce the margin for interpretation as to what constitutes extraordinary circumstances that would allow airlines to deny compensation, the Transport and Tourism Committee followed Parliament existing position, adopted in 2014 to have a defined list of exceptions, such as natural disasters, war, weather conditions or unforeseen labour disputes (excluding strikes by airline staff).

    Hand luggage and more rights for vulnerable travellers

    MEPs want to facilitate air travel by introducing common dimensions for hand luggage. Passengers should have a right to carry on board one personal item, such as a handbag, backpack or laptop (maximum dimensions of 40x30x15 cm), and one small hand luggage (maximum dimensions of 100 cm and 7 kg) without an additional fee.

    MEPs also want to ensure kids under 12 years old are seated next to their accompanying passenger free of charge. They also want more protections for persons with reduced mobility by making sure an accompanying person can travel with them free of charge, and adding a compensation right in case of loss/damage to mobility equipment or injury to an assistance animal.

    Multimodal journey

    In a separate vote, Transport MEPs backed new draft EU rules on passenger rights in multimodal journeys comprising at least two modes of transport (plane-bus, train-bus-plane, etc.) by 32 votes to one and nine abstentions. If a passenger has bought a single multimodal contract from one operator, switching between transport modes should not mean losing protection against missed connections and assistance, MEPs say. Should a missed connection result in a travel delay of 60 minutes or more, the passenger should be offered meals, refreshment and a hotel stay free of charge, as needed.

    Since only a single multimodal contract would offer full protection, the Transport and Tourism Committee inserted an obligation for carriers and intermediaries to inform travellers, before purchase, what kind of ticket they are buying (single, combined or separate multimodal). Failing to do so would make sellers liable for reimbursement of the ticket and for 75% compensation if the passenger misses a connection.

    Quotes

    Rapporteur on enforcement of passenger rights Matteo Ricci (S&D, IT) said: “Today’s vote marks an important step toward fairer and more transparent travel. The agreed compromises protect all passengers, with special attention to persons with disabilities and reduced mobility, and introduce concrete measures such as the clear definition of free hand luggage up to a maximum size of 100cm, a fundamental right to avoid unjustified extra costs. Increased transparency for intermediaries and strengthened enforcement bodies will ensure a fairer and more efficient system. Parliament is taking a strong position that defends citizens’ rights.”

    Rapporteur on air passenger rights Andrey Novakov (EPP, DE) added: “Every delay, cancellation or confusion at the gate reminds us why passengers need stronger rights. Better protection for passengers also means clear and fair rules for industry. The European Parliament has made real progress, but our work is far from over.”

    Rapporteur on passenger rights in the multimodal journey Jens Gieseke (EPP, DE) said: ““For the first time, we are creating clear and enforceable rights for combined journeys by train, plane, bus or ferry. We are enshrining in law key guarantees – including the right to timely and reliable information, fair reimbursements for missed connections, more accessibility for people with reduced mobility, and clear liability rules for intermediaries and carriers. Our proposals are intended to strengthen passenger confidence and encourage companies to develop more attractive multimodal offers. They set out clear, reasonable obligations for carriers – and at the same time ensure passengers are not abandoned.”

    Next steps

    Transport Committee MEPs also decided to start talks with EU countries on the final shape of legislation, if plenary gives its green light in July 2025: unanimously by 42 votes on passenger rights in the multimodal journey; and by 40 votes to one on enforcement of passenger rights.

    Background information

    In 2014, Parliament reacted to a Commission proposal to update air passenger rights, proposing that delayed or stranded air passengers receive better access to compensation, while providing airlines clearer rules on how to deal with passenger complaints. Progress on reaching an interinstitutional agreement was stalled for 11 years, until in June 2025 EU ministers reached a political agreement among themselves on the file, opening the way for negotiations with Parliament.

    In 2023, Commission suggested more amendments to ensure the effective protection of passenger rights in the Union when travelling by air, rail, sea and inland waterways and bus and coach transport. Commission also suggested complementing these existing rules by ensuring passengers enjoy a similar level of protection when they switch between these transport modes during a journey.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Status of permanent seasonal workers in Spain – E-001493/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission publishes unemployment statistics based on the EU Labour Force Survey (EU LFS)[1]. The EU-LFS serves as the primary source of labour market information in the EU.

    However, it does not provide specific data on permanent seasonal workers (PSW), as a distinct category. During their active work season, PSW are classified as employed, but in the off-season they are categorised as unemployed if actively seeking work, or as outside the labour force otherwise.

    1. PSW figures at the national level would offer country-specific insights for this specific group. For detailed information on PSW, dedicated national data could be the most suitable source. For country-specific analyses, the Commission often relies on figures published by national providers to complement the findings.

    2. In European official statistics released by Eurostat, the employment status of individuals is determined according to internationally recognised methodologies and in compliance with EU regulations. The EU-LFS is conducted consistently across countries and over time, guided by Commission Implementing Regulation 2019/2240 on the organisation of a sample survey in the labour force domain[2], and adheres to the International Labour Organisation definitions. Eurostat validates the quality of survey data and metadata to ensure they comply with EU regulations and provide harmonised information.

    3. The Commission considers that out-of-work PSW who are not actively seeking employment cannot be classified as unemployed under existing statistical definitions. No revision of the data collection methodology is planned.

    • [1] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_impl/2019/2240/oj/eng.
    • [2] Idem.
    Last updated: 24 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Transparency of EU financing of NGOs and civil society organisations in Hungary – E-001011/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission would kindly refer the Honourable Member to the publicly available Financial Transparency System (FTS)[1] and the attached Annex I.

    On the FTS, the Commission makes available information on recipients of funds financed from the EU budget, where it is implemented in direct management .

    Operating grants are awarded competitively. Applicants submit proposals with the description of their work programmes, annexed to the grant agreement , which may mention, among other activities, advocacy activities.

    The Commission does not prescribe the specific activities in the applicants’ work programmes . Nonetheless, agreements involving activities directed at EU institutions, even if they do not breach the legal framework, may entail reputational risks for the EU.

    To mitigate these risks, the Commission has issued guidance[2] to all Commission services, clarifying which activities should not be mandated as a condition for EU financing. As part of a grant agreement, beneficiaries must commit to respecting EU values.

    The Commission does not have a general responsibility for monitoring the Member States’ funding from the national budgets to civil society organisations.

    For EU funding under shared management, based on the requirement of Article 49(3) of the Common Provisions Regulation[3] (CPR), a complete list of projects is publicly available on the responsible Hungarian authority’s website[4].

    T he implementation of EU funds governed by the CPR requires compliance with the Charter of Fundamental Rights[5] throughout the programming period, horizontal enabling condition (HEC)[6]. When the HEC is not fulfilled, the related expenditure under the CPR is not reimbursed from the EU budget.

    The Commission monitors through its annual Rule of Law Report[7] the situation of civil society in all Member States. In that context, it has noted that concerns related to the Hungarian State’s role in financing civil society persist[8] and has made recommendations in that respect[9].

    Hungary is subject to measures under the Conditionality Regulation[10] to protect the EU budget from breaches of the principles of the Rule of Law, which include the suspension of funds.

    Per Article 5(2) of the regulation, the imposition of measures does not affect a Member States’ obligations toward beneficiaries and final recipients.

    See annex : Annex

    • [1] https://ec.europa.eu/budget/financial-transparency-system/index.html ( The annual publications are based on Article 38 of the Financial Regulation (OJ L 2024/2509, 26.9.2024, p. 1-239), and in accordance with the third paragraph of the article, information on recipients is not disclosed in specific cases outlined therein . Information regarding financial year 2024 will be published on the portal in June 2025).
    • [2] https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/docs/2021-2027/common/guidance/guidance-funding-dev-impl-monit-enforce-of-eu-law_en.pdf.
    • [3] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32021R1060.
    • [4] https://www.palyazat.gov.hu.
    • [5] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:12012P/TXT.
    • [6] Article 6 of the Common Provisions Regulation (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32021R1060).
    • [7] https://commission.europa.eu/publications/2024-rule-law-report-communication-and-country-chapters_en.
    • [8] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=SWD:2024:0817:FIN:EN:PDF.
    • [9] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=SWD:2024:0817:FIN:EN:PDF.
    • [10] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32020R2092.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Alchemy with the actual unemployment figure and exclusion from benefits and support – E-001688/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Eurostat definition of unemployed is based on guidelines and global standards provided by the International Labour Organisation (ILO).

    In line with Article 148 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), the guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States (the ‘Employment Guidelines’) are to guide policy implementation in the Member States and in the EU, including in matters related to unemployment benefits[1].

    Member States retain their autonomy to determine the details of their social security systems (Article 153(4) TFEU), including which benefits are provided, their eligibility conditions and their calculation methods. Consequently, Greece retains its competence to determine the amounts of unemployment benefits to be provided.

    The reform of the unemployment benefit system, tested on a pilot basis under the EU Recovery and Resilience Facility, is part of the Greek government’s effort to streamline unemployment benefits, to improve public spending efficiency and facilitate transitions to employment.

    The ongoing pilot considers prior work experience and applies an indexation of the benefit to the latest daily net wage level, which is decreasing over time to motivate return to work thereby having a positive impact on the coverage of the unemployment insurance system.

    The pilot is based on a study funded by the Commission and complements the employment incentive introduced by Law 4921/2022[2], whereby unemployed persons who find a job during the duration of the unemployment benefit are entitled to 50% of the remaining benefit as an incentive in addition to their salary.

    • [1] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L_202403134.
    • [2] https://www.kodiko.gr/nomologia/download_fek?f=fek/2022/a/fek_a_75_2022.pdf&t=098149c7b54fc11d14f3b0da58d67f17.
    Last updated: 24 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: REPORT containing a motion for a non-legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Implementing Protocol (2025-2030) to the Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Government of Greenland and the Government of Denmark – A10-0103/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT NON-LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION

    on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Implementing Protocol (2025-2030) to the Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Government of Greenland and the Government of Denmark

    (COM(2024)0479 – C10‑0227/2024 – 2024/0263M(NLE))

    The European Parliament,

     having regard to the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Protocol on the implementation of the Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union, on the one hand, and the Government of Greenland and the Government of Denmark, on the other (2025-2030) (14652/2024),

     having regard to the Protocol on the implementation of the Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union, on the one hand, and the Government of Greenland and the Government of Denmark, on the other (2025-2030) (14781/2024),

     having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 43(2) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C10‑0227/2024),

     having regard to the Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement (SFPA) between the European Union on the one hand, and the Government of Greenland and the Government of Denmark on the other hand, and the Implementing Protocol thereto,

     having regard to Article 62 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea,

     having regard to the Convention of the North-East Atlantic Fisheries Commission (NEAFC),

     having regard to the Convention of the North-West Atlantic Fisheries Organisation (NAFO),

     having regard to the Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic (OSPAR),

     having regard to the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework,

     having regard to the Agreement to prevent unregulated high seas fisheries in the Central Arctic Ocean,

     having regard to Protocol No 34 to the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union on special arrangements for Greenland,

     having regard to the Voluntary Guidelines for Securing Sustainable Small-Scale Fisheries of the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations,

     having regard to the EU Competitiveness Compass,

     having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 on the Common Fisheries Policy, and in particular Articles 29 and 31 thereof[1],

     having regard to Regulation (EU) 2017/2403 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2017 on the sustainable management of external fishing fleets, and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1006/2008[2],

     having regard to Council Decision (EU) No 2021/1764 of 5 October 2021 on the association of the Overseas Countries and Territories with the European Union including relations between the European Union on the one hand, and Greenland and the Kingdom of Denmark on the other (Decision on the Overseas Association, including Greenland)[3],

     having regard to the joint communication from the Commission and the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy of 13 October 2021 entitled ‘A stronger EU engagement for a peaceful, sustainable and prosperous Arctic’ (JOIN(2021)0027),

     having regard to the ex ante and ex post evaluation study of the 2021-2024 protocol and of a possible new implementing protocol to the SFPA between the European Union and Greenland,

     having regard to EU’s biodiversity strategy for 2030,

     having regard to the Commission communication of 19 February 2025 entitled ‘A Vision for Agriculture and Food – Shaping together an attractive farming and agri-food sector for future generations’ (COM(2025)0075),

     having regard to the joint communication from the Commission and the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy of 24 June 2022 entitled ‘Setting the course for a sustainable blue planet – Joint Communication on the EU’s International Ocean Governance agenda’ (JOIN(2022)0028),

     having regard to its non-legislative resolution of 5 October 2021 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of a Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union, on the one hand, and the Government of Greenland and the Government of Denmark, on the other hand, and the Implementing Protocol thereto[4],

     having regard to the reports of the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) entitled ‘Greenland Sea Ecosystem Overview’ of 2023, and ‘Greenland Sea Ecoregion – Fisheries Overview’ of 2024,

     having regard to its legislative resolution of …[5] on the draft decision,

     having regard to Rule 107(2) of its Rules of Procedure,

     having regard to the report of the Committee on Fisheries (A10-0103/2025),

    A. whereas Greenland, as an autonomous territory, is responsible for managing its fisheries resources and regulating commercial fishing in Greenland and its exclusive economic zone, and for regulating who is allowed to fish in its waters;

    B. whereas Greenland’s fisheries comprise coastal fisheries and deep-sea fisheries;

    C. whereas 88 % of Greenland’s population identifies as Greenlandic Inuit;

    D. whereas small-scale coastal fisheries and subsistence fisheries form an integral part of the traditional culture, economy and social structure of Greenland’s coastal communities and of the Greenlandic Inuit people, providing both livelihoods, in particular for isolated settlements, and cultural heritage;

    E. whereas inshore fisheries are key to ensuring food security in Greenland and contribute to addressing social challenges;

    F. whereas the SFPA between the EU and Greenland is the second most significant fisheries agreement for the EU in financial terms; whereas, according to the findings and conclusions of the ex post evaluation, the SFPA and the Protocol thereto have significantly contributed to Greenland’s fisheries policy, in particular by enhancing cooperation and collaboration and supporting sustainable fisheries management, thus creating a mutually beneficial arrangement between the EU and Greenland;

    G. whereas the EU-Greenland SFPA and the EU-Norway agreement are closely interlinked, with the EU exchanging fishing opportunities in Greenland for access to Norwegian waters; whereas in recent years, following the exchange of quotas with Norway, fishing opportunities have been granted to around 10 Community vessels under the Protocol;

    H. whereas the EU maintains a close relationship with Greenland, including through the fisheries partnership agreement that has been in place since 1984; whereas Greenland is the overseas country and territory (OCT) that receives the most EU funding by far; whereas EU support to Greenland for the period from 2021 to 2027 comes to EUR 225 million, which is equivalent to the total amount received by the other 12 OCTs combined;

    I. whereas, according to scientists, the Arctic region is warming up almost four times faster than the rest of the world, with rapid increases in ice melt and implications for fish populations, marine ecosystems and coastal communities, as well as for the fishing industry and the livelihoods of fishers, which depend on Arctic waters;

    J. whereas healthy fish populations and marine ecosystems are crucial for resilience to the growing effects of climate change and for guaranteeing the future of coastal fishing communities;

    K. whereas the accelerating pace of global warming in the region underscores the urgent need for coordinated global action, including in fisheries;

    L. whereas Greenland efficiently manages fishing activities within its EEZ, with the Greenland Fisheries and Hunting Control Authority (GFJK) responsible for registering and monitoring both domestic and foreign catches and landings and for ensuring compliance with international control and enforcement agreements, while also facilitating daily data exchanges with the countries that have fisheries agreements with Greenland;

    M. whereas the evaluation of the previous protocol reveals that overfishing can be ruled out with certainty for only five of the fifteen stocks exploited under the Protocol, but that there is a lack of scientific data for some of the stocks, and four of them are regarded as still overexploited;

    N. whereas fishing opportunities are established by a joint committee on the basis of the best available scientific advice and the recommendations made by NAFO, NEAFC and ICES;

    O. whereas fisheries are a crucial economic sector for Greenland, providing a livelihood for many; whereas it is essential to ensure that fishing practices do not harm marine ecosystems, particularly given that according to ICES, the greatest physical disturbance of the seabed and benthic habitats in the Greenland Sea ecoregion is caused by mobile bottom-contacting fishing gear and there is a considerable overlap between the distribution of corals, sponges and sea pens and the areas trawled[6]; whereas to safeguard both the marine environment and the future of fisheries, it is vital that all forms of trawling are conducted in a manner that minimises damage to the seabed; whereas according to the ex post and ex ante evaluation study, the management measures applicable to EU vessels operating in Greenland, and the risk levels of EU vessels having negative impacts on ecosystems, mean that bycatch levels and impacts on ecosystems are minimal;

     

    P. whereas ICES also points out that other activities causing marine pollution, marine litter or underwater noise, as well as climate change, are having an impact on the marine ecosystems and upsetting the balance of the ecoregion;

    Q. whereas the European Union and Greenland, on behalf of Denmark, hold seats on NEAFC and NAFO;

    Context and general principles of the SFPA

    1. Notes the importance of the fisheries sector for Greenland, given that seafood exports account for over 90 % of the autonomous territory’s total exports, and that fishing and the fishing industry together account for 15 % of all jobs; highlights the great professionalism of Greenlandic people in the fishing sector and their extensive knowledge, skills and experience in fisheries management and maritime operations; notes that their deep-rooted expertise reflects a strong commitment to maintaining the economic and cultural significance of fisheries in Greenland; stresses that the share of Greenlandic total allowable catches (TACs) allocated to the EU under the Protocol is relatively small;

    2. Recalls Greenland’s geostrategic position within the Arctic region; underlines the importance of the SFPA for relations between the European Union and Greenland in the current geopolitical context, particularly in the light of the recent diplomatic and geopolitical tensions caused by the new US Government, but also given the reality of the climate crisis and its impact on the region;

    3. Highlights the importance of using the SFPA as a key framework for addressing common challenges such as the climate crisis and geopolitical, security and preparedness concerns, for promoting sustainable fisheries policy, scientific cooperation and environmental resilience in Arctic waters, and for fostering economic cooperation; points out the need to strengthen the EU’s Arctic policy and its cooperation with the Government of Greenland;

    4. Underlines that, while guaranteeing fishing opportunities for the EU fleet, the SFPA should contribute to the exploitation of fisheries resources within sustainable limits and the preservation of marine biodiversity in Greenland’s waters, in line with the standards laid down by the European Union and international forums such as regional fisheries management organisations, in order to achieve economic, social and environmental benefits; recalls that EU vessels are to fish only the available surplus, as established in Article 3 of the SFPA;

    5. Highlights that the agreement has provided benefits to both parties, including EU and Greenlandic stakeholders, particularly in terms of sustainability, transparency, equity, scientific research, capacity-building and national development;

    6. Points out that the sectoral support available under the Protocol will help the Government of Greenland to implement its national fisheries and maritime economy strategy, including in the fight against illegal, unreported and undeclared (IUU) fishing, while promoting decent working conditions for fishing activity;

    7. Notes that the new Protocol has been concluded for a term of six years, which means improved visibility for stakeholders, in particular the fisheries sector;

    8. Notes the increase in the total financial contribution paid by the European Union and the fees paid by fishing operators, which ensure that Greenland receives economic benefits from access rights to its waters and that EU vessels operate under regulated and monitored conditions, reducing risks of overfishing or environmental damage;

    9. Underlines the high value of the SFPA and that every EUR 1 invested from the EU budget in the compensation payment for access supports the creation of EUR 6.88 of added value, with EUR 4.32 for the EU and EUR 2.12 for Greenland;

    Sustainability of fisheries under the SFPA

    10. Welcomes the robust monitoring system, the comprehensive framework for managing bycatch and the ban on discards that apply in Greenland waters; considers positively the effort made in terms of controls of fishing operations and the presence of observers in these activities, to which the sectoral support provided under the SFPA has contributed; highlights that all catches, including bycatches and discards, must be recorded and reported by species according to the applicable Greenlandic legislation; acknowledges the fundamental role of observers in ensuring compliance with the applicable rules, contributing to transparency and supporting sustainable fisheries management in the region;

    11. Reaffirms its concerns regarding the lack of precise scientific data about the state of fish stocks, which are assessed with limited data or using a precautionary approach; regrets, in particular, the situation of the Northern prawn, targeted by both Greenland vessels and Community vessels (which account for a more marginal share); notes, in this respect, the positive step taken by reducing indicative annual fishing opportunities for several fish stocks on the basis of the available scientific data;

    12. Remains concerned by the exploitation of the Northern prawn, particularly in certain areas of West Greenland, where stocks have shown signs of decline as a result of fishing pressure, global warming and increased predation by cod; emphasises the importance of strengthening sustainable management measures, including adjusting catch quotas on the basis of scientific recommendations from ICES and NAFO, and of improving fishing practices to reduce bycatch and preserve the marine ecosystem; calls on the Commission to enhance cooperation with the Greenlandic authorities to ensure a sustainable and balanced exploitation of this resource, which is essential to the local economy;

    13. Reiterates that, on the basis of the SFPA, the Commission and Greenland should continue to apply a precautionary approach and use the best available scientific advice, including the scientific recommendations issued by the relevant regional fisheries management organisations, as a basis for setting annual fishing opportunities, while also taking into consideration the socio-economic aspects;

    14. Notes that a considerable share of the fishing opportunities granted to the European Union by Greenland go to Norwegian vessels in connection with the exchange of quotas; recalls that the same sustainability standards and fisheries control rules followed by EU vessels must apply to Norwegian vessels in order to ensure that they are treated equally;

    Improvement of scientific advice and data collection

    15. Recalls that reliable and robust data is required to calculate the available surplus; reiterates its concerns regarding the existing gaps for some stocks; recommends, in this regard, that particular attention be given to calculating available surpluses; welcomes the efforts of the fisheries sector to cooperate with scientific monitoring and data collection and invites the Commission to step up scientific and financial cooperation with Greenland, including, for instance, by continuing to support the Greenland Institute of Natural Resources;

    16. Underlines the limited availability of data about benthic habitats in the Greenland Sea ecoregion, such as habitats that could potentially be considered vulnerable marine ecosystems; stresses the need to obtain more comprehensive scientific data in order to map these habitats, to adopt appropriate measures, particularly technical and spatial measures aimed at mitigating the impact of fisheries on these ecosystems, and to encourage the reporting of encounters with vulnerable marine ecosystem species (VMEs) by vessels; invites the Greenlandic authorities to consider dedicating a share of sectoral support to consolidating the mapping and detection of VMEs;

    17. Recalls that use of vessel monitoring systems is crucial for monitoring fishing activities, as it allows the real-time tracking of fishing vessels, thus making it possible to monitor compliance with the applicable rules, including in sensitive marine areas;

    18. Calls on the Commission and on Greenland to provide a further assessment of the impacts on fish stocks of other activities affecting the ecosystems, such as maritime transport, seismological research, pollution and climate change;

    Support for fisheries policy in Greenland

    19. Notes that the SFPA has generated employment opportunities for Greenlandic nationals and that sectoral support is being implemented effectively, providing significant environmental, social and economic benefits to Greenland; underlines, nevertheless, the small share of landings carried out by the EU fleet in Greenland and the limited number of seafarers from Greenland signed on with EU vessels (five, according to the evaluation of the previous agreement, accounting for 2.5 % of total jobs);

    20. Recalls, in this regard, the limited number of EU vessels fishing in Greenland under the Protocol (8-10 vessels), and notes that the majority do not land in or visit Greenlandic ports; encourages operators to maintain good cooperation and further enhance employment opportunities; highlights that according to the ex ante and ex post evaluation study, there has been no reciprocal interest in establishing joint enterprises/ventures given the priorities of the private sector in Greenland and in EU Member States;

    21. Considers that the indirect added value delivered to Greenland’s economy by the Protocol has the potential to be higher than with previous protocols; believes that the goal is to ensure a mutually beneficial agreement for the EU and Greenland, and for Greenland to derive an overall benefit from such agreements through the sustainable development of fisheries and auxiliary sectors in Greenland, which will have a lasting positive impact on the local economy;

    22. Points out that resources for sectoral support under the previous protocol helped to strengthen Greenland’s scientific research and administrative capacity and contributed to better ocean governance in Greenland;

    23. Stresses the importance, for both sides, of respecting all the relevant international commitments when implementing the Protocol, including the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples;

    24. Welcomes, too, the fact that a significant share of the sectoral support paid under the previous protocol was used to step up the monitoring of fisheries, scientific research and data collection, administration and support for small-scale coastal fisheries;

    25. Encourages the Commission and Greenland, within the framework of the SFPA, to provide further support to Greenland’s small-scale coastal fisheries, in line with the FAO’s Voluntary Guidelines for Securing Sustainable Small-Scale Fisheries and the priorities and needs of the Greenlandic authorities;

    26. Considers that sectoral support can contribute to securing the livelihoods of coastal fishing communities through such measures as, but not limited to, access to training, support for co-management in coastal areas or measures to adapt fishing activities to climate change and improve data, including data about their fishing effort;

    27. Supports the appropriate inclusion of Greenland’s fishing communities and civil society throughout the process leading to the adoption of the protocols, and stresses the importance of helping to ensure their participation in the implementation of the SFPA;

    28. Highlights that EU vessels fish beyond 12 nautical miles from the baseline of Greenland, which prevents competition with small-scale coastal fisheries;

    29. Encourages both parties to facilitate the exchange of best practices in arrangements for access to and preservation of fisheries resources;

    30. Notes Greenland’s willingness to develop its fisheries sector further; takes note of the recent reform of its fisheries legislation; highlights that the SFPA can support the continued development of Greenland’s fisheries policy; notes that this policy includes elements such as ensuring the long-term health and productivity of Greenland’s marine ecosystems and the distribution of fishing resources, including for coastal fisheries communities; recalls that Greenlandic lawmakers have exclusive competence for such developments;

    Regional governance of fisheries and challenges for the Arctic

    31. Underscores the importance of repositioning the fisheries agreement in the broader context of post-Brexit fisheries governance and regional fisheries management, relations between the European Union and Norway, and other coastal states, in the area of fisheries and the European Union’s policy on the Arctic; stresses the critical need to maintain a strong and productive partnership with Greenland and its Nordic neighbours;

    32. Encourages Greenland to continue strengthening its already strong transparency and cooperation within the framework of regional fisheries management organisations and agreements between coastal states for the management of certain stocks;

    33. Calls on the Commission to further utilise the opportunities that the Commission office in Nuuk provides, especially in terms of strengthening cooperation with the Greenlandic Government;

    34. Recalls the joint communication of 13 October 2021 entitled ‘A stronger EU engagement for a peaceful, sustainable and prosperous Arctic’;

    °

    ° °

    35. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of Greenland.

    EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

    At the end of 2024, Greenland and the European Union signed a new Protocol implementing the Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement (SFPA) (2025-2030). This is a mixed agreement that allows the European Union’s vessels to fish species such as cod, Greenland halibut, redfish and Northern prawn. In return, the European Union pays a financial contribution of EUR 17,296,857 per annum, comprising EUR 14,096,857 for access rights and EUR 3,200,000 for support and implementation of Greenland’s fisheries policy, plus the fees paid by vessel owners. In recent years, the fisheries agreement has allowed around 10 of the European Union’s vessels to operate in the autonomous territory’s waters. The new Protocol provides details of the rules and provisions governing this access.

     

    Fisheries in Greenland

     

    The fisheries sector is of central importance for Greenland in socio-economic and cultural terms. It accounts for 15% of the territory’s jobs and over 90% of its exports. Coastal fisheries mainly involve small vessels (dinghies), and sustain an economy and local jobs. Many remote Inuit communities rely on subsistence fishing. The territory also has a highly developed deep-sea fishing fleet, and has concluded fisheries agreements that allow foreign vessels to fish in the deep-sea fishing area. Greenland’s fisheries are suffering the effects of climate change on a vulnerable Arctic marine environment, with particular impacts on the species caught. Greenland has put measures in place to limit the impact of fisheries on the marine environment; these include a ban on discards, a plan for the management of bycatch etc.

     

    New Protocol implementing the SFPA

     

    The new Protocol that has been signed has a term of six years, providing stability and visibility for stakeholders. It contains provisions aimed at providing a framework for access to waters by European vessels and cooperation with Greenland: fishing opportunities, bycatch, scientific cooperation, monitoring, controls, surveillance, fishing areas, observers etc.

     

    A specific characteristic of the agreement is that catches are regulated on the basis of fishing opportunities that are set annually. Your rapporteur is concerned about the fact that, according to the ex-post evaluation, the TACs for several of the targeted species exceed the limits set on the basis of scientific advice. These proven cases of overfishing, or of uncertainty owing to a lack of data, pose a threat to fish populations and the sustainability of fisheries, as in the case of the Northern prawn. Several indicative fishing opportunities have been reduced. The second noteworthy point is linked to the need for additional data regarding the targeted species and marine ecosystems.

     

    The programming of sectoral support will be adopted in the three months following the application of the Protocol. The sectoral support allocated in recent years has made it possible to support research and scientific assessments, the administration of Greenland’s fisheries, controls and also small-scale coastal fisheries. This is assessed positively in the evaluation of the last Protocol.

     

    Findings and recommendations 

     

    In the context of current diplomatic tensions with the United States and the climate crisis in the Arctic, your rapporteur recalls the importance of the SFPA and relations between Greenland and the European Union in the area of fisheries. Through its sectoral support, the fisheries agreement offers assistance that is welcomed by the authorities and a number of civil society actors in Greenland. Positive developments include the increase in the financial contribution paid by the European Union, in the amount of sectoral support and in the fees paid by vessel owners.

     

    Your rapporteur invites the European Union to provide increased support to coastal fishing communities, with respect for the rights of the indigenous peoples and the FAO’s Guidelines for Securing Sustainable Small-Scale Fisheries. It is advisable to ensure that these peoples, as well as NGOs, are involved in the agreement. Another positive development is the European Union’s support in areas such as controls, the fight against IUU fishing, the collection of data and scientific research.

    Your rapporteur underlines the environmental challenges associated with the agreement. As already requested by Parliament in 2021, it is essential to continue efforts in relation to data collection and the fight against overfishing, by following the scientific advice for setting TACs in Greenland and allocating annual fishing opportunities to the European Union. Even though it fishes smaller quantities, the European Union must follow the precautionary principle. The definition of the surplus is controversial in certain cases. The fishing carried out by the European Union’s vessels furthermore has an impact on seabed ecosystems and the emphasis must be on identifying and protecting vulnerable marine ecosystems, with the sector’s help.

     

    Finally, your rapporteur asks for this fisheries agreement to be repositioned in the context of regional fisheries governance. Quota exchanges mean that post-Brexit relations with coastal countries, including Norway, are closely linked to the agreement. The European Union and Greenland must strengthen cooperation and transparency within the RFMOs and the agreements between coastal states. More broadly, the European Union must do more to protect species and the marine environment in the Arctic.

     

     

     

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Recruitment of children and adolescents by armed groups in Colombia – E-001758/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    Fighting the recruitment of minors in armed conflicts remains among key EU’s priorities, in line with the 2003 Guidelines on Children and Armed Conflict, as updated in 2024[1],[2]. The EU regularly raises the issue of child and forced recruitment in Colombia in its bilateral dialogues as well as in multilateral fora[3].

    As part of the Group of Friends of United Nations Resolution 1612, the EU supports numerous projects on children and armed conflict in Colombia.

    An example is ‘Entornos protectores’, a project focused on providing guarantees and opportunities for children and adolescents at risk of recruitment/use by armed actors.

    This includes culturally sensitive education programmes, psychosocial support, and community-based early warning systems developed in collaboration with local leaders to prevent recruitment, particularly for indigenous communities and girls.

    The EU also supports disarmament, demobilisation, and reintegration programmes to rehabilitate former child recruits, providing vocational training and reintegration support in a conflict sensitive way.

    The EU continues to support human rights defenders in Colombia — including those focused on the rights of the child and on child recruitment — through different means such as the EU Protect Defenders Mechanism[4].

    The EU Delegation in Colombia is currently implementing human rights and civil society projects for a total budget of EUR 9 239 032. It is also expanding its partnerships with local actors to strengthen community-led conflict and recruitment prevention efforts.

    • [1] https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2024/06/24/children-and-armed-conflicts-council-updates-eu-guidelines-and-approves-conclusions/.
    • [2] https://childrenandarmedconflict.un.org/2025/02/joint-statement-by-eeas-secretary-general-srsg-for-children-and-armed-conflict-on-the-international-day-against-the-use-of-child-soldiers/.
    • [3] https://www.eeas.europa.eu/delegations/un-new-york/eu-statement-%E2%80%93-un-peacebuilding-commission-ambassadorial-meeting-colombia_en.
    • [4] https://protectdefenders.eu/.
    Last updated: 24 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Murder of indigenous guards and ancestral wise men in Colombia – E-001750/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The rights of indigenous peoples are an integral part of the EU external human rights policy, as per the Council Conclusions on Indigenous Peoples of May 2017[1].

    The EU is committed to supporting indigenous peoples and their ancestral authorities as part of its human rights and peacebuilding strategy in Colombia, including in its dialogues with national authorities and through concrete action.

    Several EU-financed projects — including those within the framework of the #DefendamosLaVida campaign — are focused on the protection and empowerment of human rights defenders and social leaders in Colombia.

    Special attention is always placed on indigenous community territories, working closely with their organisations to strengthen their collective protection mechanisms.

    The EU Delegation in Colombia is currently implementing human rights and civil society projects for a total budget of EUR 9 239 032.

    The EU has made numerous public declarations[2] supporting the work of indigenous communities and demanding measures to protect them.

    These declarations also increase public awareness and contribute to reducing security risks. During the 15th EU-Colombia Human Rights Dialogue, the EU stressed the importance of recognising and respecting indigenous peoples’ self-governance and territorial autonomy as a key contribution to peacebuilding.

    • [1] https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-8814-2017-INIT/en/pdf.
    • [2] https://x.com/GBertrand_UE/status/1897359034065559625, https://x.com/UEenColombia/status/1864416363164450838.
    Last updated: 24 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Case number SA.104638 – E-001536/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    As a matter of policy, the Commission does not comment on bilateral exchanges between the Commission and Member States or complainants at the stage of the preliminary investigation. Should the Commission decide to open a formal investigation procedure, communication on the proceedings will follow at that time.

    Last updated: 24 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Quarrying in Pentadaktylos destroying the natural environment and amending the regulation on trade across the Green Line – E-002402/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002402/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Costas Mavrides (S&D)

    The Pentadaktylos mountain range in the occupied part of Cyprus has suffered incalculable damage and irreparable alteration of the natural landscape due to uncontrolled and illegal quarrying, in gross violation of all principles of environmental management and protection. Rare local species of flora and fauna are at risk of total extinction. What is more, many products produced in the Occupied Territories, as well as illegally extracted aggregates, are not subject to environmental or other certifications and checks (relating to health, safety or working conditions), creating unequal and unfair competition, as similar undertakings in the free areas operate under strict control and face higher production costs in order to comply with legislation.

    In view of this, can the Commission say:

    • 1.Is Republic of Cyprus able to prohibit the entry of such products into free areas in order to protect legitimate businesses and ensure that environmental and other laws are upheld?
    • 2.Will it revise the Green Line Regulation to explicitly prohibit the transport of aggregates from the Occupied Territories, taking into account the serious impact thereof on the environment and on healthy competition in the market, and adapt the regulation’s provisions to safeguard the rights of natural and legal persons, including property rights, as in the EU’s other regulation on financial assistance to the Turkish Cypriot community in the Occupied Territories?

    Submitted: 14.6.2025

    Last updated: 24 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Questionable European intelligence service reports on an impending Russian attack on the EU as a pretext for debt-financed arms build-up programmes – E-001291/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The intelligence threats assessments of the Member States remain outside the remit of the Commission. Therefore, the Commission is not in a position to evaluate or assess them.

    The Commission officials, in their public statements, have been referring to open-source information in which Member States’ intelligence services assessed the probability of Russian aggressive actions against the EU as likely in a five-year perspective.

    Commission defence industry programmes and instruments aimed at boosting European defence are proposed in the context of growing threats to European security which are proliferating in a way that poses an acute challenge to the EU way of life. This was the case even before Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022.

    However, the Russian full-scale war of aggression against Ukraine has forced the EU and its partners to confront the reality of high-intensity war returning on the European continent on a scale never seen since 1945. Consequently, in the Commission assessment the only way the EU can ensure peace is to gain the ability to deter those who could harm the EU.

    Therefore, in March 2025, the Commission and the High Representative/Vice-President presented jointly the White Paper for European Readiness 2030[1] and the President of the Commission previously proposed the ReArm Europe Plan that lays down sound funding foundations to support a surge in defence.

    This long-term endeavour will enable the Member States to build up their armed forces to face any scenario, including the most extreme military contingencies.

    • [1] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52025JC0120.
    Last updated: 24 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Measures to support people with Down syndrome and initiatives for the self-representation of people with disabilities – E-001954/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    1. The initiatives planned under the strategy for the Rights of Persons with Disabilities 2021-2030[1] address the rights and needs of persons with disabilities in all their diversity, including people with Down syndrome. Promoting independent living and inclusion in the community are among the key objectives of the strategy, as well as inclusive and accessible education of all children with disabilities, including Down syndrome . While specific standards for social, educational or support services for persons with Down syndrome have not been issued, the Commission has provided guidance in various areas of life concerning them, such as independent living or employment, highlighting the importance of considering the diversity of disabilities[2].

    2. The Commission supports the participation in decision-making processes of persons with disabilities, including people with intellectual disabilities such as people with Down syndrome. For instance, the Guide of good electoral practices for citizens with disabilities[3], adopted as part of the Commission’s EU Citizenship Package, presents an overview of practices aiming to further improve participation of citizens with disabilities in the electoral process. The Commission involves organisations representing persons with intellectual disabilities such as people with Down syndrome through the Disability Platform[4], as well as on the occasion of the European Day of Persons with Disabilities[5]. In addition, to enhance the involvement of people with intellectual disabilities such as people with Down syndrome, the Commission is upscaling the use of easy-to-read formats across its information and consultation documents.

    • [1] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A52021DC0101.
    • [2] Commission Notice — Guidance on independent living and inclusion in the community of persons with disabilities in the context of EU funding, C/2024/7897 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7188/oj/eng.
    • [3] Guide of good electoral practices in Member States addressing the participation of citizens with disabilities in the electoral process https://commission.europa.eu/publications/guide-good-electoral-practices-member-states-addressing-participation-citizens-disabilities_en.
    • [4] Register of Commission expert groups and other similar entities https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/expert-groups-register/screen/expert-groups/consult?lang=en&groupId=3820&newsTypeId=2.
    • [5] European Day of Persons with Disabilities 2024 — https://employment-social-affairs.ec.europa.eu/european-day-persons-disabilities-2024-2024-11-28_en.
    Last updated: 24 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Commission President’s participation at the WEF – E-000243/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    1. On 20, 21 and 23 January 2025, the President of the Commission participated in the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos, Switzerland. At the WEF 2025, the President of the Commission met with Her Excellency Karin Keller-Sutter, President of the Helvetic Confederation, and the President of the United States National Academy of Medicine.

    The President participated in the following events:

    — Opening remarks and question and answer (Q&A) session at ‘Deutsche Meets Davos’ Event;

    — Opening remarks and Q&A session ‘Europe‘s Competitiveness Compass: A Conversation with Ursula von der Leyen and International Business Council’;

    — Opening remarks at the launch of the Energy Transition Forum ‘All Hands on Deck for the Energy Transition’, together with the President of Peru;

    — Opening remarks and Q&A session at Financial Times lunch;

    — Remarks at the ‘Scaling Up Renewables in Africa’ high-level event, organised by Global Citizen as a follow up to the campaign launched with South Africa in November 2024.

    3. The President’s mission costs will be published on a dedicated website[1].

    2. At the WEF 2025, the President of the Commission delivered a keynote speech, where she addressed topics like competitiveness, simplification, decarbonization, energy supplies and the relations with China and the United States[2]. Following her address, she provided more details by replying to questions by Klaus Schwab, Founder and Chairman of the World Economic Forum. The keynote address and the exchange can be watched online[3].

    • [1] https://ec.europa.eu/transparencyinitiative/meetings/mission.do?host=a2c7c963-a9ad-4c47-aa73-4bb46b06dd5d.
    • [2] https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/SPEECH_25_285.
    • [3] https://audiovisual.ec.europa.eu/en/video/I-265956.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – General Court judgment in Case T-36/23 (Stevi and The New York Times v Commission) – P-001943/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission is still analysing the judgment of the General Court and will comply with its duty to take the necessary measures to comply with the judgment in due course.

    In particular, since the General Court has found that the Commission should have provided a more precise explanation of its statement according to which it does not hold the requested documents, the Commission will review the situation in light of this finding and will adopt a new decision.

    The General Court has ordered the Commission to pay the costs of the case. Since they have not yet been liquidated, it is not possible to quantify them at this stage.

    The General Court does not put into question the Commission’s documents registration policy. These rules aim to ensure the integrity and validity of the Commission’s records and that important documents drafted or received by the Commission can be retrieved and eventually made accessible to interested EU citizens.

    The Commission will continue to strictly abide by the solid legal framework in place for access to documents. The Commission remains fully committed to maintaining openness, accountability and clear communication with all stakeholders, including EU institutions, civil society, and interest representatives.

    Last updated: 24 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – ‘Safe third country’ concept – E-002241/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002241/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Marco Tarquinio (S&D), Leoluca Orlando (Verts/ALE), Rudi Kennes (The Left), Mélissa Camara (Verts/ALE), Jaume Asens Llodrà (Verts/ALE), Ilaria Salis (The Left), Brando Benifei (S&D), Alessandro Zan (S&D), Pasquale Tridico (The Left), Mounir Satouri (Verts/ALE), Saskia Bricmont (Verts/ALE), Murielle Laurent (S&D), Estrella Galán (The Left), Giorgio Gori (S&D), Emma Rafowicz (S&D), Evin Incir (S&D), Sandro Ruotolo (S&D), Anna Strolenberg (Verts/ALE), Matjaž Nemec (S&D), Pernando Barrena Arza (The Left), Chloé Ridel (S&D), Alessandra Moretti (S&D), Nicola Zingaretti (S&D), Annalisa Corrado (S&D), Marta Temido (S&D), Erik Marquardt (Verts/ALE), Özlem Demirel (The Left), Fabienne Keller (Renew), Damien Carême (The Left), Per Clausen (The Left), Maria Walsh (PPE), Krzysztof Śmiszek (S&D), Gaetano Pedulla’ (The Left), Udo Bullmann (S&D), Cecilia Strada (S&D), Rima Hassan (The Left)

    The Commission has proposed a review of the ‘safe third country’ (STC) concept[1] that:

    – eliminates the mandatory connection between the applicant and the STC;

    – considers transit through an STC a sufficient link to apply the concept;

    – in the absence of a connection or transit, applies the concept if there is an agreement or arrangement with a third country that examines the asylum application;

    – eliminates the automatic suspensive effect of appeals against inadmissibility decisions that are based on the concept.

    However, the European Court of Human Rights’ case-law has repeatedly clarified that a transfer to a third country respects the ECHR only if the applicant has a significant connection with the country and if effective and accessible procedural safeguards are guaranteed.

    Therefore, how will the Commission:

    • 1.ensure that the application of the STC concept in the absence of a concrete link, and the abolition of the automatic suspensive effect of appeals, are compatible with international law, including Article 13 ECHR and Article 47 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, which enshrine the right to an effective remedy?
    • 2.guarantee that such a broad interpretation of the STC concept will not lead to a systemic externalisation of asylum responsibilities, contrary to the spirit of the Common European Asylum System and the EU’s international obligations?

    Supporters[2]

    Submitted: 4.6.2025

    • [1] Proposal of 20 May 2025 for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2024/1348 as regards the application of the ‘safe third country’ concept (COM(2025)0259).
    • [2] This question is supported by Members other than the authors: Cristina Guarda (Verts/ALE), Benedetta Scuderi (Verts/ALE)

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Security: Pacific Partnership 2025 Conducts Mission Stop in Nuku’Alofa, Tonga, June 23, 2025 [Image 6 of 11]

    Source: United States Navy (Logistics Group Western Pacific)

    Issued by: on


    NUKU’ALOFA, Tonga (June 23, 2025) Hospitalman Anthony Carretocardona conducts an eye exam for a local resident at Vaiola Hospital as part of Pacific Partnership 2025 (PP-25) in Nuku’alofa, Tonga, June 23, 2025. PP-25 medical teams are providing free eye exams and prescription glasses at Vaiola Hospital and Mu’a Health Center while in Nuku’alofa, Tonga. Now in its 21st iteration, the Pacific Partnership series is the largest annual multinational humanitarian assistance and disaster management preparedness mission conducted in the Indo-Pacific. Pacific Partnership works collaboratively with host and partner nations to enhance regional interoperability and disaster response capabilities, increase security and stability in the region, and foster new and enduring friendships in the Indo-Pacific. (U.S. Navy photo by Courtesy Asset)

    Date Taken: 06.23.2025
    Date Posted: 06.23.2025 23:29
    Photo ID: 9128314
    VIRIN: 250623-N-RM599-9743
    Resolution: 4032×3024
    Size: 3.05 MB
    Location: NUKU’ALOFA, TO

    Web Views: 7
    Downloads: 1

    PUBLIC DOMAIN  

    MIL Security OSI