NewzIntel.com

Category: Americas

  • MIL-OSI USA: After Visiting Guantanamo Bay, Senators Blast Trump Admin for Wasting Taxpayer Dollars & Misusing Military Resources

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Alex Padilla (D-Calif.)

    After Visiting Guantanamo Bay, Senators Blast Trump Admin for Wasting Taxpayer Dollars & Misusing Military Resources

    Delegation scrutinizes military role in DHS migrant relocation operations
    WASHINGTON, D.C. — Yesterday, U.S. Senator Alex Padilla (D-Calif.), Ranking Member of the Senate Judiciary Immigration Subcommittee, joined a delegation of U.S. Senators in traveling to Naval Station Guantánamo Bay, Cuba (GTMO) to conduct oversight of the ongoing Department of Defense activities to support the Department of Homeland Security in the unlawful relocation of migrants.
    The delegation was led by Senator Jack Reed (D-R.I.), the Ranking Member of the Senate Armed Services Committee (SASC), and included Senator Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.), the Ranking Member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Senator Gary Peters (D-Mich.), the Ranking Member of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, and Senator Angus King (I-Maine), a senior member of SASC.
    The Senators conducted a firsthand examination of the missions underway at GTMO. They met with military servicemembers, ICE officers, and DHS officials to fully understand the costs and military readiness impacts of these missions.
    After returning from the trip, Senators Padilla, Reed, Shaheen, King, and Peters issued the following statement:
    “We salute the outstanding American servicemembers and DHS officials who are working tirelessly at Guantanamo Bay. Our troops in Guantanamo have a uniquely difficult, demanding job that requires great sacrifices by them and their families. We know that border security and immigration enforcement are critical to our national security, and we thank these servicemembers, ICE officers, and defense civilians for their professionalism and candor with us.
    “However, after examining the migrant relocation activities at Guantanamo Bay, we are outraged by the scale and wastefulness of the Trump Administration’s misuse of our military. It is obvious that Guantanamo Bay is a likely illegal and certainly illogical location to detain immigrants. Its use is seemingly designed to undermine due process and evade legal scrutiny.
    “The staggering financial cost to fly these immigrants out of the United States and detain them at Guantanamo Bay—a mission worth tens of millions of dollars a month—is an insult to American taxpayers. President Trump could implement his immigration policies for a fraction of the cost by using existing ICE facilities in the U.S., but he is obsessed with the image of using Guantanamo, no matter the cost.
    “Worse, President Trump is undermining our military readiness at a perilous moment in the world. We met with dozens of servicemembers who were rushed to Guantanamo Bay without notice, leaving their critical day-to-day military missions behind in order to build tents that should never be filled and guard immigrants who should never be held there. Our troops will always answer the call and get the job done, but their invaluable time and resources are being carelessly wasted by the President on this mission.
    “We are also angered that we had to fly to Cuba to get answers to the questions we’ve been asking the Trump Administration for months. By steadfastly ignoring Congress, Defense Secretary Hegseth and Homeland Security Secretary Noem are forcing their servicemembers and officers on the ground to try to make sense of Trump’s contradictory and political orders without any guidance or support.
    “We are calling on the Trump Administration to immediately cease this misguided mission. The migrant relocation operation at Guantanamo Bay is unsustainably expensive, operating under questionable legal authority, and harmful to our military readiness.”
    Last month, Padilla denounced Trump’s relocation of immigrants from the United States to Guantánamo Bay as unlawful and demanded answers regarding these relocations. In the letter, Padilla and the other Senators emphasized that noncitizens in ICE custody are entitled to legal protections under immigration law and the Constitution, including due process.

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: Drug traffickers running routes through war zones, top UN official warns

    Source: United Nations MIL OSI

    Law and Crime Prevention

    A “new black market” for synthetics and drug trafficking through war zones are fuelling instability around the world, the chief of the UN drugs and crime office said on Monday.

    “Today, the illicit drug market is becoming more unpredictable, driven by the impact of synthetic drugs,” Ghada Waly, Director-General of the UN Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), said, addressing the opening of the latest session of the Commission on Narcotic Drugs in Vienna.

    “Trafficking routes run through war zones and rule of law vacuums, from Haiti to the Levant to the Golden Triangle, fuelling instability.”

    Tracking the global illicit drug trade

    With over 2,000 participants and 179 side events, the commission’s session takes place from 10 to 14 March, with experts from around the world taking stock of the narcotic drugs trade as countries grapple with deadly tides of opioids like fentanyl while also highlighting gains made through joint operations.

    For its part, UNODC supports more than 180 border control units in 87 countries to intercept drug flows. In 2024, UN-facilitated seizures included 300 tonnes of cocaine, 240 tonnes of synthetic drugs and 100 tonnes of precursors.

    “We are facilitating backtracking investigations, bringing together law enforcement agencies and prosecutors from source, transit and destination countries,” Ms. Whaly explained.

    Watch the opening session here:

    A new black market

    She also warned of emerging threats. Technology is radically transforming and accelerating how drugs are sold and distributed, with the dark web having created a “new black market” for synthetic drugs and precursors, Ms. Whaly said.

    “Cryptocurrencies allow traffickers to move illicit profits undetected, and social media platforms have become major channels for promoting and advertising drugs online, particularly targeting young people and vulnerable users,” she said.

    She also cautioned that drug trafficking networks are capitalising on these changes to expand their reach.

    Chasing the most urgent threat

    One of the biggest threats is synthetic drugs, she said. Synthetic manufacturing labs are being uncovered in new countries and regions. Indeed, more than 1,300 distinct psychoactive substances have been reported to UNODC to date.

    At the same time, amphetamine-type stimulants and pharmaceutical opioids are registering record seizures. Synthetic opioids of the nitazine class are on the rise, with 26 different substances reported to UNODC so far, she added.

    “Synthetic drugs have become one of the most urgent and elusive drug challenges that we face,” Ms. Whaly said. “They are evolving every day, expanding in reach and growing in potency.”

    Clandestine labs

    Clandestine production laboratories are emerging in parts of the world typically not known to produce synthetic drugs, Ms. Whaly said.

    The methods to manufacture drugs and the means to traffic them are constantly evolving. Now, the internet is growing as a marketplace for drugs as well as a platform to exchange knowledge on how to make them.

    Unlike plant-based substances, synthetic drugs can be manufactured quickly, at a low cost, almost anywhere in the world. They can also be moved across borders in bulk, often concealed in legitimate exports or in such large quantities that individual seizures “barely make a dent”, Ms. Whaly said.

    “Simply put, they are harder to identify, intercept and interrupt,” she added.

    UNODC

    A drug seizure operation in South Africa.

    Fuelling instability

    Every region has suffered from the spread of synthetic drugs, she said, citing several examples:

    In the Middle East and Africa, the captagon trade – a highly addictive stimulant popular on the battlefield – has been fuelling instability, with production and smuggling now deeply intertwined with conflict, Ms. Whaly said.

    In Iraq, seizures of the drug surged by more than 3,300 per cent between 2019 and 2023, with authorities seizing 4.1 tonnes in a single year.

    Large stockpiles were discovered in Syria, she said, adding that the situation following the fall of Assad requires close monitoring and attention.

    In Southeast Asia, authorities seized a record 190 tons of methamphetamine in 2023, with criminal networks exploiting the region’s porous borders to move their product. Meth products are often found in heroin, vapes and counterfeit tablets and can be even more potent than fentanyl.

    The Commission on Narcotic Drugs was established by Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) in 1946 to assist in supervising the application of the international drug control treaties.  Learn more about the commission here.

    MIL OSI United Nations News –

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: Afghanistan: Opium prices approach historic peaks, crime syndicates benefit

    Source: United Nations MIL OSI

    Law and Crime Prevention

    Prices for opium in Afghanistan have increased tenfold since the de facto authorities imposed a drug ban in 2022 following their takeover in Kabul, latest UN data shows.

    One kilogramme of opium cost $750 last year, up from $75 just three years ago, compensating sellers for the loss in overall production and poppy fields, according to the UN Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC).

    “Heroin and opium seizures are down about 50 per cent in weight since 2021,” the UN agency reported, highlighting that the post-ban decrease in production in Afghanistan has led to a decline in opiate trafficking.

    Opium is the naturally occurring primary active ingredient used in the production of heroin, a more potent, synthetic drug. The three main global sources of illegal opium are Afghanistan, Colombia and Myanmar.

    Because of the higher prices, “massive profits are still being made, primarily benefiting high-level traders and exporters in organised crime groups,” UNODC noted.

    Dwindling stockpiles

    The UN agency estimates that opiate stocks at the end of 2022 totalled 13,200 tonnes, enough to potentially meet demand for Afghan opiates until 2027.

    “The surge in opium prices and the substantial stockpiles mean that drug trafficking in Afghanistan remains a highly profitable illicit trade,” said UNODC executive director Ghada Waly.

    “The profits are being channeled to transnational organised crime groups, destabilising Afghanistan, the region and beyond. We need a coordinated counter-narcotics strategy that targets trafficking networks while at the same time investing in viable economic livelihoods for farmers to provide long-term stability for Afghanistan and its people.”

    Afghanistan’s stockpiles before the drop in opium cultivation are believed to have been worth between $4.6 billion and $5.9 billion, or roughly 23 to 29 per cent of the country’s economy in 2023. This may have helped some ordinary Afghans to withstand the crippling economic problems the country has faced since the return of the de facto authorities, UNODC said.

    Farmers’ struggle

    Nevertheless, with 60 per cent of stockpiles likely in the hands of large traders and exporters and only 30 per cent of farmers holding “small to modest” reserves in 2022, “most farmers who previously cultivated opium are likely experiencing severe financial hardship,” the UN agency warned.

    Sustainable economic alternatives are urgently needed to discourage them from returning to poppy cultivation, particularly given today’s high opium prices.

    The UN agency also warned that the continued shortage of opium may motivate buyers and sellers to look to alternative drugs that are potentially even more harmful than heroin, such as fentanyl or other synthetic opioids.

    MIL OSI United Nations News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: News 03/28/2025 Blackburn Statement on New Interim U.S. Attorney for the Western District of Tennessee

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn)

    NASHVILLE, Tenn. – U.S. Senator Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) released the following statementafter President Trump named Joseph Murphy as the interim U.S. Attorney for the Western District of Tennessee: 

    “I am so pleased that we will have new leadership at the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Western District of Tennessee. Over the last few years, Shelby County has endured an unacceptable surge in violent crime, and Memphis is now ranked the most dangerous city in America. While crime has continued to skyrocket in the Western District, indictments brought by the U.S. Attorney’s Office are at the lowest level they have been at in years. That’s precisely why we need a U.S. Attorney who will return to increased caseloads, aggressively enforce our federal criminal laws, and keep violent offenders behind bars so that Memphians can feel safe again. I have worked with President Trump to ensure that Memphis’ chief federal prosecutor is competent, tough-on-crime, and pro-law enforcement. Joe Murphy is a skilled federal prosecutor who has dedicated decades of his career to serving the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Memphis. As Interim U.S. Attorney, Mr. Murphy will crack down on violent crime, keep dangerous offenders off our streets, and fulfill President Trump’s promise to Make America Safe Again.”

    RELATED

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI Global: The move toward AI deregulation could put financial markets at risk

    Source: The Conversation – Canada – By Sana Ramzan, Assistant Professor in Business, University Canada West

    As Canada moves toward stronger AI regulation with the proposed Artificial Intelligence and Data Act (AIDA), its southern neighbour appears to be taking the opposite approach.

    AIDA, part of Bill C-27, aims to establish a regulatory framework to improve AI transparency, accountability and oversight in Canada, although some experts have argued it doesn’t go far enough.

    Meanwhile, United States President Donald Trump’s is pushing for AI deregulation. In January, Trump signed an executive order aimed at eliminating any perceived regulatory barriers to “American AI innovation.” The executive order replaced former president Joe Biden’s prior executive order on AI.



    Read more:
    How the US threw out any concerns about AI safety within days of Donald Trump coming to office

    Notably, the U.S. was also one of two countries — along with the U.K. — that didn’t sign a global declaration in February to ensure AI is “open, inclusive, transparent, ethical, safe, secure and trustworthy.”

    Eliminating AI safeguards leaves financial institutions vulnerable. This vulnerability can increase uncertainty and, in a worst-case scenario, increase the risk of systemic collapse.



    Read more:
    The Paris summit marks a tipping point on AI’s safety and sustainability

    The power of AI in financial markets

    AI’s potential in financial markets is undeniable. It can improve operational efficiency, perform real-time risk assessments, generate higher income and forecast predictive economic change.

    My research has found that AI-driven machine learning models not only outperform conventional approaches in identifying financial statement fraud, but also in detecting abnormalities quickly and effectively. In other words, AI can catch signs of financial mismanagement before they spiral into a disaster.

    In another study, my co-researcher and I found that AI models like artificial neural networks and classification and regression trees can predict financial distress with remarkable accuracy.

    Artificial neural networks are brain-inspired algorithms. Similar to how our brain sends messages through neurons to perform actions, these neural networks process information through layers of interconnected “artificial neurons,” learning patterns from data to make predictions.

    Similarly, classification and regression trees are decision-making models that divide data into branches based on important features to identify outcomes.

    Our artificial neural networks models predicted financial distress among Toronto Stock Exchange-listed companies with a staggering 98 per cent accuracy. This suggests suggests AI’s immense potential in providing early warning signals that could help avert financial downturns before they start.

    However, while AI can simplify manual processes and lower financial risks, it can also introduce vulnerabilities that, if left unchecked, could pose significant threats to economic stability.

    The risks of deregulation

    Trump’s push for deregulation could result in Wall Street and other major financial institutions gaining significant power over AI-driven decision-making tools with little to no oversight.

    When profit-driven AI models operate without the appropriate ethical boundaries, the consequences could be severe. Unchecked algorithms, especially in credit evaluation and trading, could worsen economic inequality and generate systematic financial risks that traditional regulatory frameworks cannot detect.

    Algorithms trained on biased or incomplete data may reinforce discriminatory lending practices. In lending, for instance, biased AI algorithms can deny loans to marginalized groups, widening wealth and inequality gaps.

    In addition, AI-powered trading bots, which are capable of executing rapid transactions, could trigger flash crashes in seconds, disrupting financial markets before regulators have time to respond. The flash crash of 2010 is a prime example where high-frequency trading algorithms aggressively reacted to market signals causing the Dow Jones Industrial Average to drop by 998.5 points in a matter of minutes.

    Furthermore, unregulated AI-driven risk models might overlook economic warning signals, resulting in substantial errors in monetary control and fiscal policy.

    Striking a balance between innovation and safety depends on the ability for regulators and policymakers to reduce AI hazards. While considering financial crisis of 2008, many risk models — earlier forms of AI — were wrong to anticipate a national housing market crash, which led regulators and financial institutions astray and exacerbated the crisis.

    A blueprint for financial stability

    My research underscores the importance of integrating machine learning methods within strong regulatory systems to improve financial oversight, fraud detection and prevention.

    Durable and reasonable regulatory frameworks are required to turn AI from a potential disruptor into a stabilizing force. By implementing policies that prioritize transparency and accountability, policymakers can maximize the advantages of AI while lowering the risks associated with it.

    A federally regulated AI oversight body in the U.S. could serve as an arbitrator, just like Canada’s Digital Charter Implementation Act of 2022 proposes the establishment of an AI and Data Commissioner. Operating with checks and balances inherent to democratic structures would ensure fairness in financial algorithms and stop biased lending policies and concealed market manipulation.

    Financial institutions would be required to open the “black box” of AI-driven alternatives by mandating transparency through explainable AI standards — guidelines that are aimed at making AI systems’ outputs more understandable and transparent to humans.

    Machine learning’s predictive capabilities could help regulators identify financial crises in real-time using early warning signs — similar to the model developed by my co-researcher and me in our study.

    However, this vision doesn’t end at national borders. Globally, the International Monetary Fund and the Financial Stability Board could establish AI ethical standards to curb cross-border financial misconduct.

    Crisis prevention or catalyst?

    Will AI still be the key to foresee and stop the next economic crisis, or will the lack of regulatory oversight cause a financial disaster? As financial institutions continue adopt AI-driven models, the absence of strong regulatory guardrails raises pressing concerns.

    Without proper safeguards in place, AI is not just a tool for economic prediction — it could become an unpredictable force capable of accelerating the next financial crisis.

    The stakes are high. Policymakers must act swiftly to regulate the increasing impact of AI before deregulation opens the path for an economic disaster.

    Without decisive action, the rapid adoption of AI in finance could outpace regulatory efforts, leaving economies vulnerable to unforeseen risks and potentially setting the stage for another global financial crisis.

    Sana Ramzan does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    – ref. The move toward AI deregulation could put financial markets at risk – https://theconversation.com/the-move-toward-ai-deregulation-could-put-financial-markets-at-risk-251208

    MIL OSI – Global Reports –

  • MIL-OSI: BexBack Launches 100x Leverage, Double Deposit Bonus, and $50 Welcome Bonus — No KYC Required

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    SINGAPORE, March 29, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — As crypto markets remain volatile, BexBack is empowering traders with 100x leverage, no KYC, and a 100% deposit bonus to maximize returns. Whether you’re a seasoned pro or just starting, BexBack offers exceptional opportunities for profitable trading.

    Why Trade with 100x Leverage on BexBack?

    • Amplified Profits: Control larger positions with smaller capital.
    • Low Capital Requirement: Enter high-value trades with minimal investment.
    • Trade Both Directions: Profit whether the market goes up or down.
    • No KYC: Start trading immediately, no identity verification needed.

    What is 100x Leverage and How Does It Work?

    With 100x leverage, a 1 BTC position can control 100 BTC. For example, if Bitcoin rises from $100,000 to $105,000, your profit would be 5 BTC, giving you a 500% return.

    100% Deposit Bonus

    Double your funds instantly with 100% deposit bonus — available on all deposits greater than 0.001 BTC or 100 USDT. Use the bonus to open larger positions and increase profits.

    About BexBack

    BexBack is a leading cryptocurrency derivatives platform offering 100x leverage on BTC, ETH, SOL, XRP, and other popular cryptos. Headquartered in Singapore, BexBack serves over 500,000 traders globally, providing fast execution, no deposit fees, and 24/7 customer support.

    BexBack is a US MSB (Money Services Business) licensed platform, trusted by traders in over 200 countries, including the US, Canada, and Europe.

    Why Choose BexBack?

    • No KYC Required – Start trading instantly.
    • 100% Deposit Bonus – Double your funds immediately.
    • High-Leverage Trading – Up to 100x leverage on crypto futures.
    • $50 Welcome Bonus – For new users after completing your first trade.
    • Demo Account – Practice risk-free with 10 BTC and 100K USDT in virtual funds.
    • Global Support – 24/7 customer service.

    Sign Up Now — Break the KYC and Leverage Barriers.

    If you missed the previous crypto bull run, this could be your chance. With BexBack’s 100x leverage and 100% deposit bonus and $50 bonus for new users (complete one trade within one week of registration), you can be a winner in the new bull run.

    Sign Up Now on BexBack — Break the 100x Leverage and KYC Barriers, Get Double Deposit Bonus and $50 Welcome Bonus Instantly

    Website: www.bexback.com

    Contact: business@bexback.com

    Contact:
    Amanda
    business@bexback.com

    Disclaimer: This press release is provided by BexBack. The statements, views, and opinions expressed in this content are solely those of the content provider and do not necessarily reflect the views of this media platform or its publisher. We do not endorse, verify, or guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of any information presented. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial, investment, or trading advice. Investing in crypto and mining related opportunities involves significant risks, including the potential loss of capital. Readers are strongly encouraged to conduct their own research and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. However, due to the inherently speculative nature of the blockchain sector–including cryptocurrency, NFTs, and mining–complete accuracy cannot always be guaranteed. Neither the media platform nor the publisher shall be held responsible for any fraudulent activities, misrepresentations, or financial losses arising from the content of this press release.Speculate only with funds that you can afford to lose.Neither the media platform nor the publisher shall be held responsible for any fraudulent activities, misrepresentations, or financial losses arising from the content of this press release. In the event of any legal claims or charges against this article, we accept no liability or responsibility.

    Legal Disclaimer: This media platform provides the content of this article on an “as-is” basis, without any warranties or representations of any kind, express or implied. We do not assume any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information presented herein. Any concerns, complaints, or copyright issues related to this article should be directed to the content provider mentioned above.

    Photos accompanying this announcement are available at:
    https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/864d6022-17df-448b-9227-2afe5ef57ec3
    https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/93e803e5-c903-45f7-9226-2779199da8fe
    https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/dccb7700-dc2c-4383-b410-a73cc1b01fe4
    https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/9931338b-a07a-414a-8394-f83b37955433

    The MIL Network –

  • MIL-OSI: SafeCard Reviews [CONSUMER REPORTS 2025]: Don’t Buy Till You’ve Read This!

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    MONROE, La., March 29, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Transactions are now faster than ever thanks to contactless payment methods and RFID-enabled cards, but they have also made it easier for criminals to gain access to your private information. Powerful RFID skimming devices have made it possible for cyber criminals to collect your personal card information without any physical contact, and the sad part is that you have probably been a victim in the past, with or without realising it. Many people are now looking for trustworthy methods to safeguard their personal and financial data without the bulk of RFID wallets and sleeves.

    SafeCard RFID Blocking Card Reviews

    We will be discussing the SafeCard, a thin and lightweight RFID-blocking card that promises to stop unwanted scanning of debit cards, credit cards, and other RFID-enabled devices. Many USA consumer reports claim it’s a sleek, hassle-free answer to digital theft, unlike heavy RFID wallets or thin sleeves. Does it, however, work as advertised? Any SafeCard Reviews Complaints on Trustpilot And Reddit?

    It’s important to be on the safe side given the abundance of security devices available on the market. Despite their lofty claims, several RFID-blocking devices fall short of providing adequate protection, leaving consumers vulnerable to cyber theft. Others are difficult to use, requiring frequent modifications or adding needless bulk to wallets.

    But does the SafeCard really work, or is it simply another overhyped RFID-blocking device? Is it worth your dime? What is the real truth of the SafeCard Shield, despite the hype it’s getting in the USA? To answer all these questions and more, we will look more closely at what makes it special, go over some of its main features, pros and cons and actual customer experiences.

    Introduction to Safecard

    What is Safecard (Safecard Reviews)

    If this is your first time hearing about this RFID Blocking device, your first question would be ‘What is The SafeCard?’ So let’s start by answering that. SafeCard is an innovative RFID-blocking gadget made to prevent unwanted scanning of passports, credit cards, debit cards, and other RFID-enabled objects.

    Scammers can now obtain important information from your cards without making direct contact using powerful RFID skimming devices. By creating an imperceptible barrier that prevents these scanning efforts, SafeCard provides a dependable solution and guarantees the security of your financial and personal information.

    SafeCard neutralizes skimming devices by using active interference technology. It creates a barrier around your cards when you carry them in your wallet or purse, keeping identity thieves out. For shoppers, travelers, and anybody else worried about digital security, this makes it a great option.

    SafeCard’s lightweight, thin design is one of its best qualities; it lets customers experience safety without having to carry heavy accessories. With its long-lasting build and universal compatibility with all RFID-enabled cards, it provides long-term 24/7 protection. The SafeCard is a simple, cost-effective, and efficient method of protecting your private information that gives you peace of mind wherever you go.

    FLASH OFF: Click Here To Buy SafeCard From The Official Website – Up To 50% Off, Only While Stock Lasts

    Explanation on How The SafeCard Shield Works

    SafeCard prevents unwanted scanning of your passports, credit cards, debit cards, and other RFID-enabled objects by actively blocking RFID and NFC signals. In contrast to conventional RFID-blocking wallets or sleeves that passively protect cards from signals, SafeCard instantly blocks scanning efforts, guaranteeing that even with sophisticated skimming tools, cybercriminals cannot access your private data. Just put the SafeCard in your wallet, handbag, or cardholder with your other cards to use it. It surrounds them with a protective field that prevents unwanted scanners from picking up RFID signals.

    Most RFID-enabled cards are compatible with SafeCard’s active protection solution, which provides a more sophisticated and dependable option than passive shielding techniques. Its lightweight and thin design also makes it possible for you to use it conveniently without having to deal with the bulk. SafeCard guarantees that your financial and personal information is always secure; you can now travel, buy, or commute with peace of mind.

    Verified Distinguishing Features Of The SafeCard (SafeCard Reviews USA)

    The SafeCards manufacturer’s objective is to provide you with a convenient and safe experience while keeping you one step ahead of fraudsters. SafeCard has recorded a plethora of customer reviews and validated testimonials supporting its functionality. Let’s look at the unique features of SafeCard:

    • Advanced RFID Blocking: SafeCard’s innovative RFID and NFC blocking technology is central to its effectiveness.. The card uses a strong electromagnetic shielding mechanism to stop your ID badges, smart passports, debit cards, and credit cards from being scanned without your permission. Verified users have shared their experiences, proving that SafeCard is effective; thus, this isn’t simply a theoretical assertion. For example, Hannah L. recalled that she had twice been the victim of card skimming at airports. She reported feeling secure after using SafeCard, pointing out that its covert and lightweight design has already thwarted multiple scanning efforts. These first-hand reports provide strong proof that SafeCard performs as intended.
    • Lightweight and Simple design: The thin, light, and simple design of SafeCard is a huge plus. Nobody is interested in dealing with bulky gadgets as they make daily routine tiresome. SafeCard is nearly undetectable in your wallet or purse because it is only 1.1 mm thick, unlike conventional RFID-blocking wallets or sleeves. Another confirmed customer, Emma R., emphasized this advantage by drawing comparisons to RFID wallets she had previously used. She underlined that SafeCard provided the same security without sacrificing comfort or convenience, while the conventional choices were cumbersome and inconvenient; this implies that you will get dependable protection that fits in well with your way of life.
    • No batteries needed: SafeCard offers 24/7 protection as it does not need batteries or recharging. Long-lasting performance without the inconvenience of moving around with chargers or replacing out batteries is guaranteed. The SafeCard is a great option for both regular travelers and daily commuters who require round-the-clock safety wherever they go.
    • Universal compatibility: Another feature that sets SafeCard apart from the competition is its universal compatibility. SafeCard is compatible with all RFID-enabled devices, including transport passes, credit and debit cards, and even access cards. The SafeCard eliminates the need for you to switch between different kinds of protective sleeves for different kinds of cards. You can simplify your security requirements and ensure complete protection across all your RFID-enabled cards with SafeCard.
    • Long-lasting: The manufacturers of the SafeCard are aware that durability is important to you. Long-term use is ensured by SafeCard’s construction using premium, dust-proof, and water-resistant materials. The card is made to resist normal wear and tear, whether you’re driving through crowded cities or in inclement weather. The SafeCard won’t require regular replacements or extra care for many years.
    • Travel-friendly: The TSA-friendly design of SafeCard is a big plus for frequent travelers. Traditional RFID-blocking wallets that could set off alarms during airport security checks are an annoyance, and we understand that. SafeCard was designed to make sure that your trip is easy and hassle-free. Verified buyer Rachel T. told how scammers accessed her bank account while she was traveling through Rio. Her trip was transformed by a SafeCard recommendation, and she now feels confident knowing her wallet is protected. When you are walking through congested public areas or airports, this certainty is priceless.
    • Multi-layer protection: Apart from its fundamental RFID-blocking features, SafeCard incorporates multi-layer encryption. This extra function makes sure that your data is protected by layers of strong encryption, even in the event of an unauthorized attempt to access it. The encryption serves as an additional barrier, protecting your private information from prying eyes even while the device concentrates on preventing illegal scans.
    • Affordable: The SafeCard is available at a surprisingly affordable price. Users of most pay grades can afford the SafeCard without breaking the bank.

    Is SafeCard Better Than RFID Sleeves?

    Many people, especially frequent travelers, are looking for trustworthy methods to safeguard their financial and personal data due to the growing threat of digital theft and illegal RFID scanning. For many years, RFID-blocking sleeves were the only popular solution, hence the tolerance despite their many drawbacks. The SafeCard is here now and is superior to conventional RFID sleeves.

    The fact that RFID sleeves only use passive shielding to prevent signals is one of their main drawbacks. A coating of metallic substance inside these sleeves keeps RFID readers from accessing card data. However, the card must be fully covered and positioned inside the sleeve for them to be effective. Protection may be jeopardized if a card is even slightly exposed or if the sleeve wears out. Conversely, SafeCard makes use of active detection technologies in conjunction with sophisticated electromagnetic shielding. It ensures constant protection by automatically blocking RFID scanning attempts, saving users from having to manually insert or remove cards.

    SafeCard’s lightweight and thin design, which fits easily into any wallet, is another significant benefit. Although theoretically functional, RFID-blocking sleeves can be cumbersome and inconvenient. The fact that each card must be stored separately makes them difficult for many people to use. As a result, people who carry several RFID-enabled cards will need to buy extra sleeves or swap out their cards often. By providing universal safety for all surrounding RFID cards without the need for separate storage, SafeCard removes this inconvenience. Emma R., a verified buyer. recounted her experience, pointing out that SafeCard is so discreet that she hardly notices it’s there and that it performs better than RFID wallets or sleeves.

    Another area in which SafeCard performs better than conventional RFID sleeves is durability. Many sleeves are composed of thin fabrics that eventually rip, deteriorate, or lose their usefulness. SafeCard, on the other hand, is made to endure regular use and has dustproof and water-resistant components that guarantee long-term use. Users don’t have to bother with inefficient shielding or the need to replace worn-out sleeves on a regular basis. The SafeCard is an excellent investment for digital security and definitely superior to RFID and sleeves.

    FLASH OFF: Click Here To Buy SafeCard From The Official Website – Up To 50% Off, Only While Stock Lasts

    Shocking Myths and Truths About SafeCard (SafeCard Shield Reviews)

    As a dependable defense against illegal RFID scanning, SafeCard has grown in popularity in the USA as well as other countries of the world, but like many security devices, it has also been shrouded in rumors and false beliefs. It’s important to distinguish fact from fiction in order to appreciate SafeCard’s true worth. The most common myths and the facts that refute them are listed below.

    Myth 1: SafeCard Is Just Another RFID Sleeve

    The idea that SafeCard works in the same way as a conventional RFID sleeve is among the most common fallacies. Many people believe that passive blocking using material layers is the same approach used by all RFID shielding. This is not at all the case, though. SafeCard is an instant RFID-blocking device that blocks scanning attempts in real time. In contrast to RFID sleeves, which, depending on their quality, can still permit some signals to get through, SafeCard automatically blocks attempts at data compromise.

    Myth 2: RFID Skimming Isn’t a Real Threat

    There is no actual risk of card information being taken electronically, according to those who think RFID skimming is an overblown problem. However, innumerable instances have demonstrated that physical contact is not necessary to compromise RFID-enabled cards. High-tech scammers have targeted travelers in particular, using concealed RFID scanners to collect card information in crowded places like airports and public transportation. Hannah L., a verified buyer. “I’ve had my cards skimmed in airports twice, and it was terrifying,” she said, sharing her story. I truly feel safe when traveling now that I have SafeCard.” This actual case demonstrates that RFID skimming is a genuine and expanding issue.

    Myth 3: SafeCard Is Bulky and Inconvenient

    Some people believe that RFID-blocking devices must be bulky. Well, this might be the case with large wallets that prevent RFID, but SafeCard was made to be portable and convenient. It is lightweight, slim, and fits neatly into any purse or wallet without taking up much space. As confirmed purchaser Emma R. stated, “I’ve previously used RFID wallets, but they were cumbersome and inconvenient. I don’t even realize SafeCard is there, yet it works so much better! “

    Myth 4: SafeCard Requires Constant Charging

    Some people feel that SafeCard is stressful for daily usage because it requires frequent recharging. On the other hand, SafeCard does not need charging at all. It will continue to work 24/7 without needing a battery.

    Myth 5: RFID-Blocking Products Are Unnecessary if You Have a Chip Card

    Many people believe that current chip-enabled debit and credit cards are sufficiently safe and don’t need extra RFID protection. When the card is only in a pocket or wallet, chip technology does not stop unwanted RFID scanning, even though it helps improve security during transactions. By providing an additional layer of security, SafeCard prevents hackers from stealing your data without your knowledge.

    Truth: SafeCard Offers Genuine Security and Peace of Mind

    Despite all of the fallacies, SafeCard is still a legit and useful card for safeguarding personal and financial data. Verified customers have continuously commended its dependability, use, and capabilities. One happy client, Aubree R., said, “I purchased a SafeCard for my family and myself. It’s so simple to use, and I feel more at ease every day knowing that we’re all safe. Ultimately, SafeCard stands out as a reliable, efficient, and user-friendly defense against RFID skimming.

    Step-by-Step Guide on How to Use SafeCard (SafeCard Instructions)

    Using SafeCard is simple and requires no complicated setup. Follow these steps to ensure maximum protection:

    • Step 1: Unbox your newly purchased SafeCard; the good thing is that you don’t need to charge it.
    • Step 2: Insert SafeCard alongside your credit, debit, or ID cards in your wallet or purse.
    • Step 3: SafeCard activates instantly, creating a shield that blocks RFID scanning attempts.
    • Step 4: You can now travel safely because the SafeCard will continue to work as long as it’s in the same wallet with your cards.

    Is SafeCard Legit?

    Many customers are understandably wary of security products given the rising risk of identity theft, digital fraud and probably previous bad experiences with the traditional RFID wallets. Devices with big claims but that fall short are common in the market, which makes people skeptical of SafeCard and similar tools. However, SafeCard’s authenticity is strongly supported by verified customer feedback, demonstrating that it is a valid and trustworthy RFID-blocking device.

    The SafeCard ensures that all your sophisticated RFID-enabled cards, including credit cards, debit cards, passports, and access badges, cannot be scanned without your notice. Unlike conventional blocking sleeves, SafeCard instantly recognizes and blocks scanning efforts in real time. Users attest to the product’s effectiveness; one verified customer, Hannah L., reports that SafeCard has already prevented many scanning attempts while on the road. Her story demonstrates how the product offers genuine defense against possible fraud.

    Numerous consumers have expressed their satisfaction, demonstrating that SafeCard prevents RFID scans and differs from subpar substitutes that don’t provide any true protection. Months of protection are guaranteed with any need for battery changes.

    The overwhelmingly positive reviews left by actual users are one of the best proofs of SafeCard’s legitimacy. Clients such as Rachel T. along with Melissa H., have reported how using SafeCard has prevented them from falling victim to financial fraud in public places. It is a worthy option for travelers because of its lightweight construction, TSA-approved design, and universal compatibility. These practical experiences attest to SafeCard’s status as a reliable security card rather than just another gimmick. SafeCard is by no means a hoax

    FLASH OFF: Click Here To Buy SafeCard From The Official Website – Up To 50% Off, Only While Stock Lasts

    What Makes the SafeCard So Affordable?

    The cost of SafeCard actually surprised many users; We mean, how can a product made to prevent RFID theft be so reasonably priced in a market filled with products with high price tags yet claim superior protection? Unlike expensive RFID-blocking wallets or expensive high-tech security devices, SafeCard provides an affordable option without sacrificing efficacy or quality.

    The simplified design of SafeCard is a major factor in its price. Instead of bundling unnecessary features that inflate the price, SafeCard focuses solely on delivering reliable RFID-blocking technology in a compact form. It doesn’t need a large structure or pricey components; production costs were kept low while still providing excellent protection against digital theft.

    Additionally, SafeCard is sold directly through its official website, cutting out middlemen and reducing extra retail markups. Many security products go through multiple distribution channels before reaching the customer, which significantly raises their final price. By offering SafeCard online without relying on third-party sellers, the manufacturer ensures that buyers get the best price possible without paying unnecessary commissions or inflated retail costs.

    Another reason SafeCard remains affordable is its long-lasting design. Unlike disposable RFID sleeves that need frequent replacement or wallets that wear out over time, SafeCard is built to last. With a durable, non-battery-powered system, it provides continuous protection without requiring users to spend extra on replacements. SafeCard proves that high-quality security doesn’t have to come with a premium price. You can give it a try right away!

    SafeCard Reviews Consumer Reports From United States, Canada, Australia

    Verified Customer Reviews from real users have been included below to help you see the SafeCard from a user perspective:

    • Hannah L. | Verified Purchase -“I’ve had my cards skimmed in airports twice, and it was terrifying. Since using SafeCard, I finally feel safe while traveling. It’s lightweight, discreet, and has stopped several attempted scans already.”
    • Rachel T |Verified Purchase – “While traveling through Rio, I discovered my bank account had been drained by scammers. I was devastated. A fellow traveler recommended SafeCard, and it’s been a lifesaver ever since. No more stolen data, no more stress. Now I can travel with confidence knowing my wallet is secure.”
    • Aubree R. | Verified Buyer – “I got SafeCard for myself and my family. It’s so easy to use, and knowing we’re all protected gives me peace of mind every day. It’s worth every penny!”
    • Emma R. | Verified Buyer – “I’ve used RFID wallets before, but they were bulky and annoying. SafeCard works so much better, and I don’t even notice it’s there!”
    • Melissa H.| Verified Purchase – “I love going to holiday markets, but after watching my friend lose hundreds to a scammer, I knew I needed protection. SafeCard blocks thieves silently, and I haven’t had an issue since. It’s the best purchase I’ve made for my security!”

    FLASH OFF: Click Here To Buy SafeCard From The Official Website – Up To 50% Off, Only While Stock Lasts

    Pros of SafeCard (SafeCard Reviews)

    • SafeCard effectively prevents unauthorized scanning of credit cards, debit cards, passports, and access cards, protecting users from digital theft.
    • Unlike bulky RFID-blocking wallets, SafeCard is ultra-thin and easily fits into any standard wallet, making it a convenient security solution.
    • No batteries or recharging needed
    • SafeCard works with RFID-enabled cards, including credit/debit cards, transit passes, and passports, making it a versatile security tool.
    • SafeCard does not interfere with airport security checks, making it perfect for frequent travelers who need reliable protection.
    • Built with durable materials, SafeCard offers reliable performance at all times
    • There is no setup required; simply place SafeCard in a wallet or purse alongside other cards, and it automatically starts protecting them.
    • SafeCard is available exclusively on its official website, eliminating middlemen and keeping costs lower than competing RFID security devices.

    Cons of SafeCard (SafeCard Reviews)

    • Limited Availability – SafeCard is only sold through the official website, making it difficult for users who prefer purchasing from retail stores or third-party platforms.
    • Not Effective Against Physical Theft – While SafeCard protects against RFID skimming, it does not prevent physical card theft, meaning users still need to be cautious about losing their wallets.
    • Limited in stock – The SafeCard is fast selling out, so hurry while supplies last, and you benefit from the current available discounts.

    How Much Is A SafeCard?

    The SafeCard is available at a really affordable price. You can get your own SafeCard at the following pricing:

    Where Can I Buy SafeCard At The Best Pricing?

    For those looking to purchase SafeCard, the best and most reliable place to buy it is the official website. Buying directly from the official source ensures that customers receive a genuine, high-quality product with all the promised features and benefits. With the rise in counterfeit and substandard RFID protection products, purchasing from unauthorized third-party sellers can pose risks, including receiving an ineffective or fake version of SafeCard.

    Ordering from the official website also comes with several advantages. Customers often gain access to exclusive discounts, bundle deals, and special promotions that are not available elsewhere. Additionally, purchasing directly from the manufacturer ensures better customer support, warranty protection, and hassle-free returns in case of any issues.

    Another key benefit of buying from the official website is the guarantee of security and privacy. Unlike some third-party marketplaces where seller credibility may be uncertain, the official website provides a secure checkout process that protects customers’ personal and payment information.
    Many verified buyers have shared their positive experiences after purchasing SafeCard directly from the manufacturer. The process is straightforward, and orders are typically shipped quickly to ensure fast and reliable delivery.

    To avoid counterfeit products and ensure authentic RFID protection, purchasing SafeCard from the official website is the smartest choice. Visit the manufacturer’s website today to secure personal and financial information with this trusted, high-quality security solution.

    CLICK HERE NOW TO BUY SAFECARD DIRECTLY FROM THE OFFICIAL WEBSITE AT A MASSIVE DISCOUNT

    Commonly Asked Questions (SafeCard Wallet)

    With so much information available, it’s natural to have questions before making a purchase. The comprehensive FAQ section below answers the most common queries about SafeCard, helping you understand the RFID blocking card better.

    Is SafeCard different from RFID-blocking wallets?

    Yes, SafeCard is not just different but better. While RFID-blocking wallets and sleeves rely on a physical barrier to block signals, SafeCard uses the latest technology to neutralize skimming attempts in real time. Additionally, it is slim and lightweight, allowing you to use your existing wallet without adding bulk.

    Do I need a special wallet to use SafeCard?

    No, SafeCard is designed to work with any wallet, purse, or cardholder. Simply place it next to your credit or debit cards, and it will provide instant protection against RFID skimming.

    What types of cards does SafeCard protect?

    SafeCard is compatible with all RFID-enabled cards, including:

    • Credit and debit cards
    • Transit and metro cards
    • Passports with RFID chips
    • Work and access cards
    • Hotel key cards

    How many SafeCards do I need?

    One SafeCard is usually enough to protect multiple cards in a standard wallet. However, if you carry multiple wallets or bags, purchasing an extra SafeCard for each would ensure full protection.

    Is SafeCard effective against all types of digital theft?

    SafeCard is highly effective against RFID skimming, a common form of digital theft where criminals use scanners to steal card data wirelessly. However, it does not protect against physical card theft.

    Does SafeCard require charging?

    No. The SafeCard doesn’t require charging, so it will continue to work in all circumstances.

    Can SafeCard be used while traveling?

    Yes, SafeCard is TSA-approved and safe for travel, so it will work in the USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and other countries of the world. Unlike metal RFID wallets that might trigger airport security detectors, SafeCard does not interfere with screening processes, making it ideal for frequent travelers.

    Will SafeCard interfere with my phone or other electronics?

    No, SafeCard does not affect mobile phones, Wi-Fi signals, or other electronic devices. It only blocks RFID scanners from reading your card data, ensuring that your personal electronics remain unaffected.

    Is SafeCard waterproof?

    Yes, SafeCard is built with water and dust-resistant materials, making it durable for everyday use. However, it is not fully submersible, so it is best to avoid prolonged exposure to water..

    Does SafeCard wear out over time?

    SafeCard is designed to be durable and long-lasting. With proper care, it will continue to provide RFID-blocking protection for years.

    Can SafeCard be used in a minimalist wallet?

    Yes, SafeCard’s slim design makes it perfect for minimalist wallets. Unlike bulky RFID-blocking wallets, it takes up minimal space while offering superior protection.

    Is SafeCard safe to use?

    Absolutely. SafeCard does not emit harmful radiation or interfere with health devices. It is completely safe to carry in a wallet or purse daily.

    What Are The Benefits Of SafeCard?

    SafeCard provides a very important defense against RFID skimming, stopping illegal access to your financial and personal information. Its lightweight, sleek design offers security without adding bulk and fits easily into any wallet. Travelers, shoppers, and regular users will enjoy the SafeCard’s long-lasting build.

    Can SafeCard protect against contactless payment scammers?

    Yes, SafeCard prevents unauthorized RFID scans, which are commonly used in contactless payment fraud. By blocking these signals, SafeCard ensures that criminals cannot access your card information without your consent.

    Why should I choose SafeCard over other RFID protection methods?

    SafeCard provides a combination of slim design, real-time protection, and universal compatibility, making it one of the most advanced RFID-blocking devices available.

    Final Wrap on SafeCard Reviews

    The SafeCard fulfills its claims according to all available data, consumer reports and complaints. Even discussions on Reddit and Trustpilot agree that the SafeCard is a worthy investment. With its advanced shielding technology, slim design, and ease of use, SafeCard makes sure your private information stays private.

    Many users have shared how SafeCard has helped them stay safe from fraud and financial loss. Rachel T., a verified buyer, recounted her experience: “While traveling through Rio, I discovered my bank account had been drained by scammers. A fellow traveler recommended SafeCard, and it’s been a lifesaver ever since.” This highlights how common digital theft is and why proactive protection is necessary.

    SafeCard also stands out for its convenience. Unlike bulky RFID wallets, it’s compact and discreet. Emma R. praised its design, saying: “I’ve used RFID wallets before, but they were bulky and annoying. SafeCard works so much better, and I don’t even notice it’s there!” This ease of use makes it a preferred choice for those who want to stay safe without the bulk.

    Investing in SafeCard is a smart step toward protecting finances and identity. With SafeCard, you will stay ahead of scammers and enjoy your trips knowing that your personal data is secure. Hurry while offers last!

    SPECIAL OFFER: Click Here To Buy SafeCard From The Official Website — up to 50% OFF, only while stock lasts!

    Contact: SafeCard
    Email: support@safecardshield.com

    Disclaimer:
    This article is intended for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute professional, legal, or cybersecurity advice. While SafeCard may help reduce the risk of RFID-based digital theft, no security product can guarantee 100% protection in all scenarios. Individual results may vary based on usage and other factors. Always exercise general caution and follow best practices when safeguarding your financial and personal data. The publisher and all parties involved in the creation and distribution of this content are not liable for any misuse, loss, or damages arising from the use or reliance on the information provided herein. Always consult the official product website or customer support for the most accurate and updated details.

    Photos accompanying this announcement are available at
    https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/73cfc771-032a-4dcd-b2b0-d26ecb66dcc6

    https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/d29cc163-cb6a-4c66-8edf-2f62994e3c33

    https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/b8ff53aa-ffa8-40dc-a79b-e77933daa881

    https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/f88be7c1-c53a-483c-8063-ef12d643d7d6

    The MIL Network –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Duckworth, Durbin Join Shaheen in Push to Overturn Citizens United Ruling

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Illinois Tammy Duckworth

    March 28, 2025

    Legislation would rid American elections of dark money & excessive corporate campaign spending

    [WASHINGTON, D.C.] – U.S. Senator Tammy Duckworth (D-IL) and U.S. Senate Democratic Whip Dick Durbin (D-IL), Ranking Member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, joined U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH) and 37 Democratic and Independent Senators to reintroduce a Constitutional amendment to overturn the Supreme Court’s Citizens United v. FEC decision, which removed campaign finance restrictions and opened the door for foreign and domestic entities to spend unlimited money to influence elections. The Democracy for All Amendment would also overturn other far-reaching decisions around campaign finance that wrongfully equated money with free speech and unfairly determined that big, wealthy corporations have the same First Amendment rights as people. 

    “It is past time that we get the corrosive influence of big money out of our politics to stop billionaires and massive corporations from boxing out the voices of middle-class families,” said Duckworth. “I’m proud to join my colleagues in supporting legislation that would overturn the disastrous Citizens United ruling and restore power to the people.”

    “The Citizens United ruling opened the floodgates for dark money to directly impact our political system for the benefit of corporations and special interests,” said Durbin. “But our government was intended to be a democracy of the people, by the people, for the people. We must mend the broken campaign finance system that elevates the voices of a few wealthy donors over millions of Americans. It’s time we enshrined the Democracy for All Amendment in our Constitution.”

    The Democracy for All Amendment would empower Congress and states to set reasonable campaign finance rules and limit corporate spending. The amendment would enshrine in the Constitution the right of the American people to regulate the raising and spending of funds in public elections and curb the concentration of political influence held by the wealthiest Americans.     

    Along with Duckworth, Durbin and Shaheen, U.S. Senators Alex Padilla (D-CA), Brian Schatz (D-HI), Chris Van Hollen (D-MD), Chris Coons (D-DE), Raphael Warnock (D-GA), Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), Tina Smith (D-MN), Ron Wyden (D-OR), Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), Michael Bennet (D-CO), Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), Angus King (I-ME), Mark Kelly (D-AZ), Martin Heinrich (D-NM), Andy Kim (D-NJ), Catherine Cortez Masto (D-NV), Chuck Schumer (D-NY), Maggie Hassan (D-NH), Peter Welch (D-VT), Ed Markey (D-MA), Bernie Sanders (I-VT), Patty Murray (D-WA), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), Ruben Gallego (D-AZ), Jacky Rosen (D-NV), Jack Reed (D-RI), Tim Kaine (D-VA), Mazie Hirono (D-HI), Adam Schiff (D-CA), John Fetterman (D-PA), Gary Peters (D-MI), Tammy Baldwin (D-WI), Ben Ray Lujan (D-NM), Mark Warner (D-VA) and Cory Booker (D-NJ) are also cosponsors of the Democracy for All Amendment. 

    Both Durbin and Duckworth were strong supporters of the For the People Act—a sweeping package of comprehensive reforms that would end special interest corruption of our politics and make government work for the people. The landmark legislation passed the House of Representatives in 2021 when it was under a Democratic majority, but failed to receive the 60 votes necessary in the Senate in June 2021 due to Republican opposition.

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Duckworth, Durbin Join Booker to Introduce Honor Farmer Contracts Act

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Illinois Tammy Duckworth

    March 28, 2025

    The legislation would require the release of illegally withheld funding for all contracts and agreements previously entered into by USDA

    [WASHINGTON, D.C.] – U.S. Senator Tammy Duckworth (D-IL) and U.S. Senate Democratic Whip Dick Durbin (D-IL), a member of the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry, joined U.S. Senator Cory Booker (D-NJ) to introduce the Honor Farmer Contracts Act, legislation to release illegally withheld funding for all contracts and agreements previously entered into by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). President Trump’s USDA has refused to make reimbursement payments to fulfill signed contracts, without any indication of when or whether farmers and other rural- or agricultural-related groups and companies will be paid or reimbursed for the money they invested or are owed. The federal government signed a contractual agreement and many participants have been left waiting for weeks and months without funding. This legislation would require USDA to pay all past due payments as quickly as possible.

    “Donald Trump—a failed businessman—is trying to skip out on paying our hardworking farmers what they are rightfully owed, jeopardizing critical contracts and local jobs that support families across Illinois,” Duckworth said. “Trump might say he loves our farmers, but his actions speak louder than words. Our Honor Farmer Contracts Act would put a stop to this chaos and ensure every penny that is being illegally withheld by this Administration is paid to our farmers as promised.”

    “These contracts are a big part of job creation and business development for farmers, rural residents, downstate towns, and even urban agriculture.  But Elon Musk and President Trump have decided these folks, like Trump’s former real estate subcontractors, who also waited for reimbursement for work performed, are just not worth it, and should go away.  Meanwhile, China is pursuing major rural investments to improve the lives of their rural citizens, like rural housing, health care, water, and technology infrastructure,” said Durbin.  “The Honor Farmer Contracts Act would ensure that USDA does the right thing by ensuring the U.S government keeps its word and pays these individuals what they are owed.”

    The Honor Farmer Contracts Act would:

    • Require USDA to unfreeze all signed agreements and contracts;
    • Require USDA to make all past due payments as quickly as possible;
    • Prohibit USDA from cancelling agreements or contracts with farmers or organizations providing assistance to farmers unless there has been a failure to comply with the terms and conditions of the agreement or contract.
    • Prohibit USDA from closing any Farm Service Agency county office, Natural Resources Conservation Service field office or Rural Development Service Center without providing 60 days prior notice and justification to Congress.

    U.S. Representative Gabe Vasquez (D-NM-02) will introduce companion legislation in the House.

    In addition to Duckworth, Durbin and Booker, the Honor Farmer Contracts is cosponsored by U.S. Senators Peter Welch (D-VT), Adam Schiff (D-CA), Chris Van Hollen (D-MD), Ron Wyden (D-OR), Martin Heinrich (D-NM), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), Angus King (I-ME), Tina Smith (D-MN), Ed Markey (D-MA), Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), Tammy Baldwin (D-WI), Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) and Bernie Sanders (I-VT). 

    To see the full list of organizations endorsing the Honor Farmer Contracts, click here.

    To read the full text of the bill, click here.

    -30-

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Duckworth, Durbin Statement on Andrew Boutros Being Named Interim U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Illinois Tammy Duckworth

    March 28, 2025

    [WASHINGTON, D.C.] – U.S. Senator Tammy Duckworth (D-IL) and U.S. Senate Democratic Whip Dick Durbin (D-IL), Ranking Member of the Senate Judiciary Committee,  today released the following statement on Andrew Boutros being named the Interim U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois:

    “The White House has assured our offices that there will be no nomination for the permanent role of U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois until the White House Counsel’s Office has consulted with both of our offices.”

    During the Biden administration, the position of U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois remained unfilled due to then-Senator J.D. Vance’s (R-OH) hold on U.S. Attorney nominees, including April Perry, who was nominated by then-President Biden to be U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois. U.S. Attorneys are empowered to prosecute all federal criminal offenses and are an integral part of our justice system. Despite these nominees’ eminent qualifications, then-Senator Vance continuously objected to Durbin’s unanimous consent requests to confirm these nominees.

    For decades, the Senate has confirmed U.S. Attorneys by voice vote or unanimous consent after they have been considered in the Judiciary Committee. Before the 117th Congress, the last time the Senate required a roll call vote on the confirmation of a U.S. Attorney nominee was in 1975. 

    That precedent changed during the Biden administration when Durbin went through this exercise twice when a Republican colleague refused to allow the Senate to confirm nearly a dozen Justice Department nominees by voice vote—the typical practice. Following a unanimous consent request, that Senator eventually lifted his objections and allowed those nominees to be confirmed.

    -30-

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Duckworth Expresses Sympathy for Myanmar, Thailand and Southeast Asia in the Wake of Catastrophic Deadly Earthquake

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Illinois Tammy Duckworth

    March 28, 2025

    [WASHINGTON, D.C.] – Today, U.S. Senator Tammy Duckworth (D-IL)—a member of the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee (SFRC)—issued the following statement expressing her sympathy for the people of Myanmar, Thailand and across the region after a powerful earthquake killed and injured hundreds of people, with many more missing and casualty tolls likely to rise:

    “Absolutely heartbroken watching the footage of the violent earthquake in Myanmar—a catastrophe of epic proportions. As brave first responders continue working to locate those missing and save lives, I’m sending my deepest sympathies to the victims, their loved ones and all those enduring the repercussions in Myanmar, Thailand and across the region. In the wake of this tragedy, the United States must join the international community and unequivocally support Southeast Asia however we can—with disaster assistance and more. Praying for safety and a swift recovery throughout this disaster.”

    -30-

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: AFSCME responds to ruling restraining shutdown of the U.S. Agency for Global Media and Voice of America

    Source: American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees Union

    NEW YORK – AFSCME President Lee Saunders released the following statement after a federal judge granted a temporary restraining order to cease further efforts to shutter the U.S. Agency for Global Media and Voice of America (VOA):

    “For now, the billionaires running this administration must pause their campaign to silence free and fair reporting. The government tried to argue that our case had no basis while at the same time releasing a reduction in force plan to lay off all AFSCME members at Voice of America – whose work is mandated by Congress. From AFSCME-represented audio engineers to journalists and more, USAGM workers are integral in distributing news to people living in oppressive regimes, and we will keep fighting against these unconstitutional attacks on their freedoms.”

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Understanding Trump’s Union-Busting Executive Order Ending Collective Bargaining For Hundreds Of Thousands Of Federal Workers

    Source: US GOIAM Union

    President Trump issued a sweeping Executive Order and related Fact Sheet invoking “national security” grounds to end collective bargaining with federal unions. Here are the facts about this outrageous and unprecedented attack on federal workers—and on the Labor movement itself.

    FACT: Federal unions do not undermine national security!

    • Federal civil servants dutifully protect and serve our nation every day and having a union has never changed that.
    • Many federal workers are veterans. Taking away their rights to a representative and a voice in the workplace by claiming it threatens “national security” shows disdain and disrespect for their lifelong dedication to public service.

    FACT: This is retaliation against unions for standing up for the workers they represent.

    • Unions, including the IAM, have been fighting Trump’s effort to ruthlessly terminate tens of thousands of federal workers in violation of laws and CBAs that prevent such arbitrary terminations. Trump cites unions filing grievances to protect workers’ rights and jobs as the rationale for his EO. Trump’s effort now to get rid of the Unions that protect those workers is retaliation for exercising rights protected by federal law.

    FACT: Collective bargaining rights for federal workers do not negatively impact the government.

    • Trump cites the very existence of binding collective bargaining agreements to protect employee working conditions as “dangerous.” But presidents from both parties have upheld the right of federal workers to union representation for decades. CBAs provide both management and employees with guideposts for an efficient and fair workplace.

    FACT: Taking away workers’ unions makes things worse, not more efficient!

    • By eliminating employee unions’ collective bargaining rights, it becomes harder for federal employees to do their jobs. They will face retaliation without any grievance process to address issues. These are the people who take care of our veterans and protect our country, who enforce laws and protect the health and safety of the public.

    FACT: This EO is designed to take away workers’ protections and unions’ abilities to fight back.

    • Ending payroll dues deduction is another direct attempt to attack unions’ ability to fight for workers. Anti-union forces always want to make it harder for members to contribute to their representation, because they hope that it will stop financial support for unions that fight back to protect workers.
    • The agencies Trump targeted are described as having critical national security missions—but these are the same agencies that he and his Elon Musk-led DOGE team are targeting for massive layoffs and budget cuts. They are stripping union representation away from workers right when they need it most!

    The IAM is working with other unions representing federal employees to mount a legal challenge to this unprecedented attack on federal workers. We will not sit back and watch workers lose the right to representation and a voice on the job!

    Share and Follow:

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI Global: How is classified information typically shared and can officials declassify secrets whenever they want? A national security expert explains

    Source: The Conversation – USA – By Dakota Rudesill, Associate Professor of Law, The Ohio State University

    Director of Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard testifies during a House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence hearing on March 26, 2025, in Washington, D.C. Nathan Posner/Anadolu via Getty Images

    U.S. District Judge James Boasberg on March 27, 2025, ordered top Trump administration officials to preserve records of their messages sent on the messaging app Signal from March 11 to March 15 following a transparency watchdog group’s lawsuit alleging that the officials have violated the Federal Records Act.

    This marked the latest development since The Atlantic on March 24 published a Signal chat among Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and other national security officials discussing specific plans to attack Houthi militants in Yemen. Jeffrey Goldberg, the editor in chief at The Atlantic, was mistakenly included in the chat and wrote about what he saw.

    Trump administration officials have shared contrasting accounts about whether they were discussing sensitive war information on Signal – but maintain that they did not share classified information.

    Senator Roger Wicker, the Republican chair of the Senate Arms Services committee, and Senator Jack Reed, the top Democrat chairing the committee, on March 27 requested an investigation into how the Trump officials used Signal to discuss military strikes.

    Amy Lieberman, a politics and society editor, spoke with national security scholar Dakota Rudesill to better understand what constitutes classified information and how the government typically handles its most closely kept secrets.

    Democratic representatives share text messages on March 26, 2025, sent by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to other top Trump administration officials.
    Kayla Bartowski/Getty Images

    How are government officials supposed to communicate about classified information?

    The first way someone with the proper clearance can communicate about classified information is in person. They can talk about secret things in what is called a sensitive compartmented information facility, or SCIF. This means a secure place, often with a big, heavy door and a lock on it, where security officials have swept the area for bugs and no one can easily eavesdrop. People who are in SCIFs usually have to leave their cell phones outside of the room, and then they can talk freely about secret information. A SCIF can be a particular room, or a floor of a building, or even an entire building.

    Second, there is print communication: written documents with classification markings, which have to be handled in really particular ways, like in a safe location, and can be transported between SCIFs in secure containers.

    Third, intelligence agencies, the White House and the Department of Defense also all have secure electronic systems. These include visual teleconferences, which are similar to a Zoom call and are secure for discussing highly classified information, as well as secure email systems and secure phones.

    Many people with clearances have what is called “high side” email, which is shorthand lingo for classified email and messaging. Many people with security clearance would have two work hard drives and two computers. One of them is “low side,” where there is access to unclassified official email, documents and the internet.

    All of these methods of secure communication can be clunky and take more time than people in our smartphone age are used to. That is the cost of protecting the nation’s secrets. My sense is the Trump administration officials wanted to move fast and turned to Signal, a commercial app that promises encryption. Signal is generally considered secure but is not perfect. There is abundant public evidence that Signal is not totally secure and indeed has been penetrated by Russian intelligence.

    Can something be declassified after the information has been shared?

    Yes. The president can classify and declassify at will via oral or written instruction.

    The president’s constitutional powers include removing classification controls after information has been released or leaked. Trump could at any point declassify the information shared on Signal. Several of the Cabinet-level officials on that Signal chat also have expansive delegated powers over classification.

    Even so, Trump’s national security Cabinet would have presumably still violated the law. For example, by putting national defense information inappropriately on an insecure app and not checking to verify the clearances of everyone on the chat and thereby allowing a reporter to be present, one could reasonably conclude that the team was showing “gross negligence,” running afoul of the Espionage Act.

    The Espionage Act, enacted in 1917, criminalizes unauthorized retention and dissemination of sensitive information that could undermine the national security of the U.S. or help a foreign country.

    Was the information shared on Signal likely classified?

    Looking at the Signal message transcript that The Atlantic shared, it seems like at least four things were all but surely classified.

    The most obvious was the details that Secretary of Defense Hegseth provided on the strike plans. These include the precise times that planes were taking off, what kind and when the bombs would fall. Recent reports have quoted defense officials confirming that this information at the time was classified.

    Second, the chat revealed that the president gave a green light for secret strikes at a Situation Room meeting.

    Third, there is the mere fact of these top officials deciding whether and when to execute attacks authorized by the president.

    And fourth, according to media reports, the chat included the name of an intelligence officer whose position may have been secret.

    The Trump administration says that there was no classified information in the chat. But several analysts have noted that defies belief. The exception would be a prior decision to declassify, but we have no evidence of that.

    FBI Director Kash Patel, left, Tulsi Gabbard, director of National Intelligence, and CIA Director John Ratcliffe testify during a House Select Intelligence Committee hearing in Washington, D.C., on March 26, 2025.
    Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images

    What other issues does this bring to mind?

    First, we don’t know whether the Trump officials carefully thought about it before they set up this chat on Signal, which the Pentagon has warned government officials against using because of hacking concerns.

    Second, even if the officials did make a focused decision to use Signal, what is the wisdom of that? I find it really, really hard to imagine that was a prudent decision when we think about how insecure this app is. There is also the fact that Steve Witkoff, Trump’s envoy to Ukraine and the Middle East, was party to the chat while he was in Russia. We do not know for sure if he had a device running Signal on him personally while he was in Russia, but in any event he would have been under intense Russian surveillance.

    A broader issue is how the Trump administration is enforcing the law is a giant question mark. Usually, the law both authorizes the U.S. government to do things, and also says it cannot do things. Law enables and limits everyone, including the president. However, Trump wrongly claims that he is the final authority on the law, and so far the Justice Department only seems to be enforcing the law against people outside of the administration.

    So does the law limit the Trump administration in any practical sense? Right now it is not clear – and there is abundant reason to be concerned about that from a rule of law standpoint.

    Dakota Rudesill does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    – ref. How is classified information typically shared and can officials declassify secrets whenever they want? A national security expert explains – https://theconversation.com/how-is-classified-information-typically-shared-and-can-officials-declassify-secrets-whenever-they-want-a-national-security-expert-explains-253207

    MIL OSI – Global Reports –

  • MIL-OSI Video: We do more before 9 a.m…

    Source: US Army (video statements)

    The Army Mission – our purpose – remains constant: To deploy, fight and win our nation’s wars by providing ready, prompt & sustained land dominance by Army forces across the full spectrum of conflict as part of the joint force.

    Interested in joining the U.S. Army?
    Visit: spr.ly/6001igl5L

    Connect with the U.S. Army online:
    Web: https://www.army.mil
    Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/USarmy/
    X: https://www.twitter.com/USArmy
    Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/usarmy/
    LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/us-army
    #USArmy #Soldiers #Military #Shorts

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Rxhsg8Rz5Q

    MIL OSI Video –

  • MIL-OSI Global: Signal-gate: a national security blunder ‘almost without parallel’

    Source: The Conversation – UK – By Jonathan Este, Senior International Affairs Editor, Associate Editor

    Depending on what you think of Donald Trump, his administration could fit either of the following two descriptions. Chaotic, vindictive and accident-prone, marked by mendacity, driven by impulse and bent on securing the will of the leader, rather than – as in the US constitution – the will of the people. Or it could be a government masterminded by a man playing 4D chess while all around him are playing chequers. A president whose deal-making skills and focus on outcomes ensure the security and prosperity of America and its allies.

    If you base your assessment on the people Trump has chosen as his key national security advisers then, after the recent Signal chat group intelligence debacle, you’d almost certainly opt for chaotic and accident-prone, at the very least.

    Looking around the Signal chatroom, who do we have? National security advisor Mike Waltz, Vice-President J.D. Vance, secretary of state Marco Rubio, defense secretary Pete Hegseth, director of national intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, CIA director John Ratcliffe and a supporting cast of other senior Trump staffers. And, unwittingly, the editor-in-chief of the Atlantic, Jeffrey Goldberg.

    Heads must roll, say Trump’s critics. But who from this hydra-headed beast should take the fall? Should it be Waltz, who invited Goldberg to the chat group? Or Hegseth, who posted operational details of a US attack, including the when, where and how, hours before it was due to take place? Should it be Vance, whose swipe at America’s freeloading European allies has caused considerable angst across the Atlantic?

    Or perhaps one or another of Gabbard and Ratcliffe, who sat in front of the Senate select committee on intelligence on Tuesday and maintained that no classified material or “war plans” had been revealed to the group – sworn evidence now revealed to be unreliable at best?

    Sign up to receive our weekly World Affairs Briefing newsletter from The Conversation UK. Every Thursday we’ll bring you expert analysis of the big stories in international relations.

    At present it seems as if none of them are going to pay for their dangerous incompetence. Instead their ire is turned on Goldberg, who has variously been called a “sleazebag” by Trump himself, “loser” and the “bottom scum of journalists” by Waltz and a “deceitful and highly discredited, so-called journalist who’s made a profession of peddling hoaxes time and time again” by Hegseth.

    Robert Dover of the University of Hull, whose research centres on intelligence and national security, believes this is a “national security blunder almost without parallel”. He points to the hypocrisy of people like Hegseth who savaged Hillary Clinton for using a private email server to conduct official business when she was secretary of state under Barack Obama.

    Dover also notes the damage the episode will have done to America’s already shaky relations with its allies in Europe. Being disparaged by the vice-president as freeloaders and dismissed by the defense secretary as “pathetic”, he believes, will be “difficult to unsee”.



    Read more:
    Signal chat group affair: unprecedented security breach will seriously damage US international relations

    But credit where it’s due, it appears that US diplomacy may at least be bearing some – limited – fruit. At least, that is, if the two partial ceasefires recently negotiated between Russia and Ukraine actually materialise. That’s a fairly big if, of course. Despite a pledge by both sides that they could support a deal to avoid targeting each other’s energy infrastructure, there’s no sign yet of a cessation of attacks.

    And there has been a degree of scepticism over the recently announced plan for a maritime ceasefire to allow the free passage of shipping on the Black Sea. Critics say this favours Russia far more than Ukraine. Over the course of the war, Ukraine has successfully driven Russia’s Black Sea fleet away from its base in Crimea, giving it the upper hand in the maritime war. But maritime strategy expert, Basil Germond, says the situation is more nuanced, and the deal represents considerable upside for Ukraine as well.



    Read more:
    Russia has most to gain from Black Sea ceasefire – but it’s marginal, and Ukraine benefits too

    Setting aside America’s eventful recent forays into foreign relations, there’s a major domestic fix brewing which many US legal scholars believe could plunge the country into a constitutional crisis.

    Anne Richardson Oakes, an expert in US constitutional law at Birmingham City University, anticipates a potential clash between between the executive and the judiciary which could threaten the separation of powers that lies at the heart of American democracy.

    Oakes observes there are more than 130 legal challenges to Trump administration policies presently before the courts, some of which will end up in front of America’s highest legal authority, the Supreme Court, which is tasked with assessing the constitutionality of those policies. She warns that we’ve already seen evidence that Trump and his senior officials resent what they consider to be interference from the judiciary into the legitimate executive power of the elected president.

    Will there be a stand-off where the Trump administration simply ignores the Supreme Court’s ruling? It’s happened before, says Oakes. In the mid-20th century, in Little Rock, Arkansas, when the governor used the state’s national guard to prevent the court-ordered desegregation of public schools. On that occasion the then president, Dwight D. Eisenhower, sent in federal troops to enforce the court’s ruling and a constitutional crisis was averted.



    Read more:
    US stands on the brink of a constitutional crisis as Donald Trump takes on America’s legal system

    But what if it’s the serving president who chooses to ignore a Supreme Court ruling? This was the case in the 1830s when greedy cotton farmers in Georgia were bent on forcing the Native American peoples off their lands. The Cherokee actually took the state of Georgia to the Supreme Court, which ruled that as a “dependent nation” within the United States they were entitled to the protection of the federal government and that the state of Georgia had no right to order their removal.

    As historian Sean Lang of Anglia Ruskin University recounts, Georgia ignored the Supreme Court’s ruling and sent in troops to expel the Cherokee who were then forced to move to new lands in a journey known as the “Train of Tears”. Lang writes that then US president, Andrew Jackson, a populist advocate of states’ rights and former “Indian fighter”, ignored the Supreme Court’s ruling, “sneering that [Chief Justice John] Marshall had no means of enforcing it”.

    Lang concludes: “It’s a history lesson Greenlanders, Mexicans and Canadians – and indeed many Americans who may fall foul of this administration and seek recourse to the law – would do well to study.”



    Read more:
    Trump’s America is facing an Andrew Jackson moment – and it’s bad news for the constitution

    Trump’s chilling effect

    The Trump administration’s antipathy towards judges who have opposed its policies have extended towards those law firms who have in some way crossed the US president. But the legal system is not the only sector to feel the chilling effect of Trump’s displeasure, writes Dafydd Townley.

    The world of higher education in the US is also apprehensive after the administration went after Columbia University, home to some of the most outspoken protest over US policies towards Israel and Gaza. Columbia has recently had to agree to allow the administration to “review” some of its academic programmes, starting with its Middle Eastern studies, after the administration threatened to cancel US$400 million (£310 million) of government contracts with the university.

    The news media is also under heavy pressure. The administration has taken control of the White House press pool from the non-partisan White House Correspondents’ Association and has blackballed Associated Press for refusing to call the Gulf of Mexico the Gulf of America. We’ve also seen Trump himself bring lawsuits against media organisations he judges to have crossed him. And now the president has called for the defunding of America’s two biggest public broadcasters, NPR and PBL, for what he perceives as their liberal bias.

    Townley, an expert in US politics at the University of Portsmouth is concerned that this all adds up to a deliberate attempt to cripple institutions which underwrite American democracy.



    Read more:
    Donald Trump’s ‘chilling effect’ on free speech and dissent is threatening US democracy

    Popularity falls as prices rise

    Trump’s leadership continues to be very polarising, writes Paul Whiteley, a political scientist and polling specialist at the University of Essex, who has spent years studying political trends in the US. Looking at the most recent numbers, Whiteley finds that while Trump’s approval ratings are fairly steady at 48% approval and 49% disapproval, when you dig down you find that only 6% of registered Democrats approve of his performance, while 93% disapprove. For registered Republicans it’s almost exactly the opposite.

    Whiteley takes his analysis further, looking at measures such as consumer sentiment, which has fallen sharply since January, with talk of tariffs and the return of inflation affecting people’s confidence in the economy. He points out there tends to be a fairly strong historical correlation between confidence in the economy and popular approval of a president’s performance.



    Read more:
    Three graphs that show what’s happening with Donald Trump’s popularity

    Another factor which will surely affect people’s confidence in the government are the job losses flowing from Elon Musk’s work as “efficiency tsar”. Thomas Gift, the director of the Centre on US Politics at University College London, believes that federal job losses as a result of Musk’s cuts are spread indiscriminately among Democrat and Republican states. As a result there may be some Republican voters who are experiencing what he calls “buyer’s remorse”.

    At the same time, rising inflation is flowing into the cost of living, something many people voted for Trump to punish the Democrats for. As Gift points out, both parties are experiencing a dip in support at present as people reject politics for having a generally negative effect on their lives. But from now, it’ll be the Republicans who will feel the sting of popular disapproval more keenly.



    Read more:
    Trump’s job cuts are causing Republican angst as all parties face backlash

    World Affairs Briefing from The Conversation UK is available as a weekly email newsletter. Click here to get updates directly in your inbox.

    – ref. Signal-gate: a national security blunder ‘almost without parallel’ – https://theconversation.com/signal-gate-a-national-security-blunder-almost-without-parallel-253245

    MIL OSI – Global Reports –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: The Nutrition for Growth Summit mobilizes over US$27 billion to reach nutrition-related Sustainable Development Goals (28 Mar. 2025)

    Source: Republic of France in English
    The Republic of France has issued the following statement:

    On March 27 and 28, 2025, at the Nutrition for Growth Summit (N4G), which was organized by the Ministry for Europe and Foreign Affairs under the auspices of Minister Delegate for Francophonie and International Partnerships Thani Mohamed-Soilihi, the international community made ambitious commitments to tackle the challenge of malnutrition in all its forms. Close to US$28 billion in nutrition funding to reach Sustainable Development Goals was announced, attesting to the exceptional degree of mobilization and renewed commitment to multilateralism.

    In total, the international community’s financial commitments in support of nutrition represent US$27.55 billion dollars. The Summit Chair’s final declaration helped reaffirm our shared commitment to global nutrition.

    One hundred twenty-seven delegations, including the governments of 106 countries, in addition to numerous international organizations, civil society organizations, development banks, philanthropic organizations, research institutions, and businesses, met together to help put an end to this scourge, which hinders countries’ economic and social development and traps communities in an intergenerational cycle of poverty. Over 400 commitments were registered on the Nutrition Accountability Framework platform.

    France remains fully committed to nutrition and food aid

    As the N4G Summit host country, France has committed to continuing its efforts in support of nutrition and, between now and 2030, plans to invest €750 million in projects supported by the French Development Agency in particular, as well as in the Ministry for Europe and Foreign Affairs’ food aid programs. In addition, France has announced that it will be boosting food sustainability education, promoting the prevention and early identification of malnutrition, and improving the nutritional quality of the food supply at the national level.

    Thani Mohamed-Soilihi, Minister Delegate for Francophonie and International Partnerships, explains:

    “This summit is a collective success for France and the international community, whose vigorous efforts have demonstrated their commitment to tackling the challenge of malnutrition. That is the strength of multilateralism: the ability to tackle challenges that know no boundaries. Malnutrition has a particularly harmful impact on young children and pregnant and breastfeeding women. We cannot look away when one out of every two children under the age of five dies from malnutrition. Proper nutrition is a challenge shared by all of our societies. It is the key to unlocking a shared, more prosperous future. This summit is not limited to financial investments; it also provides for innovative, effective investments that will have a lasting impact on development.”

    Ambitious political and financial commitments in support of nutrition

    The European Union in particular mobilized its efforts, committing a total of €6.5 billion to fight malnutrition, of which €3.4 billion was allocated by the European Commission.

    Other countries, including Madagascar, Côte d’Ivoire, Guatemala and Bangladesh also made noteworthy political and financial commitments to tackling the burden of malnutrition in their countries.

    The development banks also mobilized their efforts, particularly the World Bank and the African Development Bank, which pledged US$5 billion and US$9.5 billion respectively until 2030.

    Lastly, philanthropic organizations, civil society organizations and the private sector account for a substantial share of financial commitments. Philanthropic organizations will raise more than US$2 billion in the coming years to combat malnutrition.

    One of the Summit’s highlights was the adoption of a youth declaration calling for young people to play a greater role in decision-making in order to promote the voices of the communities most affected by malnutrition.

    Nutrition, a challenge at the heart of public policy and sustainable development

    Nutrition enables all individuals to achieve their full potential. But all countries are facing at least one type of malnutrition, whose cost to the global economy is estimated at US$41 trillion over the coming decade.

    In an uncertain international climate, the Summit helped refocus public policy on nutrition through ambitious commitments to transform the lives of millions of people worldwide. By investing in nutrition, stakeholders have opted to support policies that have a positive impact on health, social protections, gender equality, the sustainability of food systems, climate and education. Nutrition is a particularly effective choice because on average, each euro invested in this area creates 23 euros in wealth.

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI China: Greenland announces new autonomous govt

    Source: China State Council Information Office

    Greenland announced the formation of a new autonomous government on Friday amid heightened tensions with the United States.

    Just hours before the arrival of U.S. Vice President JD Vance on the Arctic island, a ceremony was held at the Katuaq Cultural Center in the Greenlandic capital of Nuuk, where four political parties representing 23 of the 31 seats in the parliament signed a coalition agreement to form the new government.

    Jens-Frederik Nielsen, chairman of the Demokraatit (Democratic Party), will serve as the new prime minister.

    Following the announcement, Nielsen emphasized national unity in the face of international pressure. “By now forming a broad coalition, we will ensure that no one in the world should have any doubt that Greenland stands united,” he told journalists.

    He reiterated that Greenland is not for sale and has no desire to become part of the United States.

    The new cabinet includes former Prime Minister Mute Egede, who will now take on the role of minister of finance and taxation. Speaking to the media, Egede said: “We are obliged to lead our country forward with the pressure that is from the outside world right now, and the interest that is in our country.”

    Vivian Motzfeldt, incoming foreign minister of Greenland’s government, told Xinhua that mutual respect must be the basis for any diplomatic engagement. “I believe it’s also crucial for us to return to a more normal way of life, especially considering the recent developments in the United States,” she said.

    “A healthy dialogue requires mutual respect. If we want a meaningful conversation, we must also show respect for the other country. So, for me, it’s essential that we establish common ground based on mutual respect,” she added.

    Aqqalu Jerimiassen, chairman of the Atassut party, underscored the need for national unity in the light of recent provocations. “Right now, I believe the priority is unity – taking care of each other and building cooperation, rather than reacting to provocations, especially those coming from the United States, and particularly from that orange-haired man (U.S. President Donald Trump) who keeps trying to provoke us,” he told Xinhua.

    In Copenhagen, when Denmark’s King Frederik X was asked by local media TV2 to comment on the growing tensions between the United States, Denmark, and Greenland, he confirmed his love for Greenland, saying that “my connection to the Greenlandic people is intact.” He also stressed that “we live in a changed reality.”

    The announcement of the new coalition drew applause from local residents at the Katuaq center. “I hope the new government can speak out on behalf of the people of Greenland,” Aviaja Martinsen, a citizen of Nuuk, told Xinhua.

    Later that day, Vance and his wife Usha, together with U.S. National Security Adviser Mike Waltz and Energy Secretary Chris Wright, arrived in Greenland. Vance delivered a speech at a U.S. military base and received a security briefing on the Arctic situation from U.S. military officials at the Pituffik Space Base.

    The timing of Vance’s visit has raised eyebrows, following repeated assertions by Donald Trump that the United States wants to take over Greenland. Officials in both Nuuk and Copenhagen view the visit as provocative.

    At a Friday press briefing at the White House, Trump reiterated: “We are not talking about peace for the United States. We are talking about world peace. We are talking about international security. And if Denmark and the EU do not understand it, we must explain it to them.”

    Greenland, once a Danish colony, became an integral part of the Kingdom of Denmark in 1953. It was granted home rule in 1979, expanding its autonomy, though Denmark retains control over foreign affairs and defense.

    MIL OSI China News –

  • MIL-OSI Global: Thousands are feared dead in Myanmar’s quake. Trump’s USAID cuts will cause even more unnecessary deaths

    Source: The Conversation – Global Perspectives – By Adam Simpson, Senior Lecturer, International Studies, University of South Australia

    In early 2021, after a decade of political and economic reforms, Myanmar looked like it was finally beginning to shake off the hangover of decades of military rule. Foreign investment was growing, and standards of living were gradually improving.

    In February that year, however, the military again grabbed power after ousting Aung San Suu Kyi’s democratically elected government in a coup. This sent the country spiralling towards civil war and social and economic collapse.

    In the latest addition to the daily misery of Myanmar’s long-suffering people, a huge 7.7-magnitude earthquake hit the centre of the country on Friday. Its epicentre was just outside Mandalay, the county’s second-largest city.

    The Thai capital of Bangkok, more than 1,000 kilometres from the epicentre, experienced extensive damage too. Video images showed a collapsing building under construction and sloshing rooftop infinity pools causing waterfalls down high-rise condominiums.

    Information on the extent of the damage in Myanmar was slower to emerge, given the junta has largely banned social media and communications apps, such as Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, Signal and X.

    The death toll has now passed 1,000 at the time of writing. US Geological Survey modelling, however, suggests there could be more than 10,000 deaths and economic losses potentially exceeding the country’s gross domestic product (GDP).

    Unusually for the isolationist military juntas of Myanmar, its leader, Min Aung Hlaing, immediately issued a call for international assistance.

    The junta, however, has full control of as little as 21% of the country in the ongoing civil war, with the rest contested or controlled by ethnic armed groups and resistance fighters. This indicates some hard-hit areas of the country may be inaccessible to international aid.

    Compounding these difficulties, the Trump administration has decimated the US Agency for International Development (USAID) activities in the country. This will make it far more challenging to determine the areas most in need and distribute any aid on the ground.

    Natural disasters in Myanmar

    Along with its history of brutal and authoritarian military rule since gaining independence in 1948, Myanmar is also regularly afflicted by natural disasters.

    At least 430 people are believed to have died in floods last September due to the remnants of Typhoon Yagi. In 2023, Cyclone Mocha reportedly killed about 460 of the Rohingya ethnic minority, who are largely confined to government camps in Rakhine state in inhuman conditions.

    The worst natural disaster in living memory, however, was Cyclone Nargis in 2008, which left at least 140,000 dead. On that occasion, the military junta resisted international assistance, likely resulting in many unnecessary deaths.

    At that time, there was no independent media in Myanmar and it was almost impossible to find out what was actually happening on the ground.

    Fortunately, the proliferation of mobile phones in the last decade has allowed information to spread much more widely, even with the junta’s internet blocks and other methods of censorship currently in place.

    When Cyclone Nargis occurred – the year after the iPhone was launched – only around 1% of the Myanmar’s population had mobile phones. By the time of the coup in 2021, Myanmar had a smartphone penetration rate of 114%. (This means the country has more smartphones than people.)

    Foreign assistance has been compromised

    While Min Aung Hlaing has gone farther than his predecessor in 2008 in asking for international help, US President Donald Trump’s actions have ensured that any aid will be far less effective than it would have been two months ago.

    On Friday, the same day the earthquake hit, the Trump administration told Congress it would cut nearly all remaining jobs at USAID and shut the agency, closing all USAID missions worldwide.

    Jeremy Konyndyk, the president of Refugees International and a former USAID official, called the move “a total abdication of decades of US leadership in the world”. He argued the firings would cut “the last remnants of the team that would have mobilised a USAID disaster response” to the earthquake.

    In 2024, USAID spent US$240 million (A$380 million) in Myanmar, around one-third of all multilateral humanitarian assistance to the country.

    However, since Trump’s inauguration in January, the number of USAID programs in Myanmar has shrunk from 18 to just three. Several NGOs and at least seven US-funded hospitals operating along Myanmar’s border with Thailand have been shut down.

    Myanmar’s exiled independent media outlets, which shine a light on the military’s atrocities, have also seen their funding slashed by the Trump administration’s USAID cuts.

    What happens now?

    The day before the earthquake, Min Aung Hlaing addressed troops at the 80th anniversary of Armed Forces Day Parade. He announced national elections would go ahead in December – a vote that human rights groups are already calling a “sham”.

    There is no conceivable way elections of any integrity can be held in the country under military rule or while the civil war continues to rage.

    Military-backed parties have been overwhelmingly rejected by Myanmar’s electorate in every remotely free or fair election over the last four decades. This includes the most recent elections held in 2020, won by the National League of Democracy (NLD), led by Aung San Suu Kyi.

    While the world should welcome – and urgently respond to – Min Aung Hlaing’s invitation for international assistance, this doesn’t mean the past is forgotten. Thousands of innocent lives have been lost as a result of the military’s unnecessary and destructive 2021 coup.

    If the NLD had remained in government, the country would be infinitely more prepared to deal with consequences of this earthquake. Once again, the military’s brutal rule – and Trump’s draconian aid cuts – will no doubt cause more unnecessary suffering and deaths.

    Adam Simpson does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    – ref. Thousands are feared dead in Myanmar’s quake. Trump’s USAID cuts will cause even more unnecessary deaths – https://theconversation.com/thousands-are-feared-dead-in-myanmars-quake-trumps-usaid-cuts-will-cause-even-more-unnecessary-deaths-253403

    MIL OSI – Global Reports –

  • MIL-OSI China: CK Hutchison’s Panama Canal deal to be reviewed

    Source: China State Council Information Office 3

    China’s top market regulator said on Friday it will carry out an antitrust review of CK Hutchison’s possible Panama Canal ports’ deal in accordance with laws to ensure fair market competition and protect public interests, according to the website of the State Administration for Market Regulation.

    In a response to media agency Hong Kong Ta Kung Wen Wei, a spokesman of the second antitrust enforcement division of the SAMR said that the regulator has noted the deal and will conduct an antitrust review.

    The move came as Hutchison Ports, a subsidiary of Hong Kong-based conglomerate CK Hutchison Holdings owned by tycoon Li Ka-shing, is reportedly in the process of selling most of its global ports business to BlackRock on April 2 for an expected $22.8 billion.

    MIL OSI China News –

  • MIL-OSI China: Regulator to conduct antitrust review of CK Hutchison’s Panama Canal deal

    Source: China State Council Information Office

    China’s top market regulator said on Friday it will carry out an antitrust review of CK Hutchison’s possible Panama Canal ports’ deal in accordance with laws to ensure fair market competition and protect public interests, according to the website of the State Administration for Market Regulation.

    In a response to media agency Hong Kong Ta Kung Wen Wei, a spokesman of the second antitrust enforcement division of the SAMR said that the regulator has noted the deal and will conduct an antitrust review.

    The move came as Hutchison Ports, a subsidiary of Hong Kong-based conglomerate CK Hutchison Holdings owned by tycoon Li Ka-shing, is reportedly in the process of selling most of its global ports business to BlackRock on April 2 for an expected $22.8 billion.

    MIL OSI China News –

  • MIL-Evening Report: Thousands are feared dead in Myanmar’s quake. Trump’s USAID cuts will cause even more unnecessary deaths

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Adam Simpson, Senior Lecturer, International Studies, University of South Australia

    In early 2021, after a decade of political and economic reforms, Myanmar looked like it was finally beginning to shake off the hangover of decades of military rule. Foreign investment was growing, and standards of living were gradually improving.

    In February that year, however, the military again grabbed power after ousting Aung San Suu Kyi’s democratically elected government in a coup. This sent the country spiralling towards civil war and social and economic collapse.

    In the latest addition to the daily misery of Myanmar’s long-suffering people, a huge 7.7-magnitude earthquake hit the centre of the country on Friday. Its epicentre was just outside Mandalay, the county’s second-largest city.

    The Thai capital of Bangkok, more than 1,000 kilometres from the epicentre, experienced extensive damage too. Video images showed a collapsing building under construction and sloshing rooftop infinity pools causing waterfalls down high-rise condominiums.

    Information on the extent of the damage in Myanmar was slower to emerge, given the junta has largely banned social media and communications apps, such as Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, Signal and X.

    The death toll has now passed 1,000 at the time of writing. US Geological Survey modelling, however, suggests there could be more than 10,000 deaths and economic losses potentially exceeding the country’s gross domestic product (GDP).

    Unusually for the isolationist military juntas of Myanmar, its leader, Min Aung Hlaing, immediately issued a call for international assistance.

    The junta, however, has full control of as little as 21% of the country in the ongoing civil war, with the rest contested or controlled by ethnic armed groups and resistance fighters. This indicates some hard-hit areas of the country may be inaccessible to international aid.

    Compounding these difficulties, the Trump administration has decimated the US Agency for International Development (USAID) activities in the country. This will make it far more challenging to determine the areas most in need and distribute any aid on the ground.

    Natural disasters in Myanmar

    Along with its history of brutal and authoritarian military rule since gaining independence in 1948, Myanmar is also regularly afflicted by natural disasters.

    At least 430 people are believed to have died in floods last September due to the remnants of Typhoon Yagi. In 2023, Cyclone Mocha reportedly killed about 460 of the Rohingya ethnic minority, who are largely confined to government camps in Rakhine state in inhuman conditions.

    The worst natural disaster in living memory, however, was Cyclone Nargis in 2008, which left at least 140,000 dead. On that occasion, the military junta resisted international assistance, likely resulting in many unnecessary deaths.

    At that time, there was no independent media in Myanmar and it was almost impossible to find out what was actually happening on the ground.

    Fortunately, the proliferation of mobile phones in the last decade has allowed information to spread much more widely, even with the junta’s internet blocks and other methods of censorship currently in place.

    When Cyclone Nargis occurred – the year after the iPhone was launched – only around 1% of the Myanmar’s population had mobile phones. By the time of the coup in 2021, Myanmar had a smartphone penetration rate of 114%. (This means the country has more smartphones than people.)

    Foreign assistance has been compromised

    While Min Aung Hlaing has gone farther than his predecessor in 2008 in asking for international help, US President Donald Trump’s actions have ensured that any aid will be far less effective than it would have been two months ago.

    On Friday, the same day the earthquake hit, the Trump administration told Congress it would cut nearly all remaining jobs at USAID and shut the agency, closing all USAID missions worldwide.

    Jeremy Konyndyk, the president of Refugees International and a former USAID official, called the move “a total abdication of decades of US leadership in the world”. He argued the firings would cut “the last remnants of the team that would have mobilised a USAID disaster response” to the earthquake.

    In 2024, USAID spent US$240 million (A$380 million) in Myanmar, around one-third of all multilateral humanitarian assistance to the country.

    However, since Trump’s inauguration in January, the number of USAID programs in Myanmar has shrunk from 18 to just three. Several NGOs and at least seven US-funded hospitals operating along Myanmar’s border with Thailand have been shut down.

    Myanmar’s exiled independent media outlets, which shine a light on the military’s atrocities, have also seen their funding slashed by the Trump administration’s USAID cuts.

    What happens now?

    The day before the earthquake, Min Aung Hlaing addressed troops at the 80th anniversary of Armed Forces Day Parade. He announced national elections would go ahead in December – a vote that human rights groups are already calling a “sham”.

    There is no conceivable way elections of any integrity can be held in the country under military rule or while the civil war continues to rage.

    Military-backed parties have been overwhelmingly rejected by Myanmar’s electorate in every remotely free or fair election over the last four decades. This includes the most recent elections held in 2020, won by the National League of Democracy (NLD), led by Aung San Suu Kyi.

    While the world should welcome – and urgently respond to – Min Aung Hlaing’s invitation for international assistance, this doesn’t mean the past is forgotten. Thousands of innocent lives have been lost as a result of the military’s unnecessary and destructive 2021 coup.

    If the NLD had remained in government, the country would be infinitely more prepared to deal with consequences of this earthquake. Once again, the military’s brutal rule – and Trump’s draconian aid cuts – will no doubt cause more unnecessary suffering and deaths.

    Adam Simpson does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    – ref. Thousands are feared dead in Myanmar’s quake. Trump’s USAID cuts will cause even more unnecessary deaths – https://theconversation.com/thousands-are-feared-dead-in-myanmars-quake-trumps-usaid-cuts-will-cause-even-more-unnecessary-deaths-253403

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Schatz, Shaheen Lead Colleagues in Condemning the Permanent Elimination of USAID

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Hawaii Brian Schatz

    WASHINGTON— Today, U.S. Senators Jeanne Shaheen, Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee, and Brian Schatz (D-HI), Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on State, Foreign Operations and Related Programs, alongside Senators Chris Coons (D-DE), Chris Murphy (D-CT), Tim Kaine (D-VA), Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Cory Booker (D-NJ), Chris Van Hollen (D-MD), Tammy Duckworth (D-IL), Jacky Rosen (D-NV) and Dick Durbin (D-IL) issued the following statement on the Trump Administration’s decision to ‘transition’ USAID into the State Department:

    “After months of empty promises to protect lifesaving assistance programs, support key national security interests and consult with Congress about the so called ‘90-day review’ of foreign assistance, the Trump Administration has notified Congress of their plan to fold USAID into the State Department. However, this process was clearly not meant to be a thoughtful review, and this administration has failed to recognize that consulting with Congress is not a suggestion—it is required by law. 

    “Trump Administration officials, including Peter Marocco and Ken Jackson, have been unable to answer basic questions about which programs have been terminated, how the waivers for ‘lifesaving assistance’ are being implemented or how these actions will impact our national security—and Secretary of State Marco Rubio has continued to ignore requests to appear before the Senate to explain and defend this review. 

    “We will not stand by silently as President Trump dismantles American leadership and takes a wrecking ball to U.S. institutions. The administration’s plan to permanently dismantle USAID and fire all of its employees will not only render it impossible for any retained USAID programs to be implemented, but the burden placed on the State Department will cause significant disruption to its core mission. This proposal is illegal, dangerous and inefficient. The American public deserves answers, and we demand them.”

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Photo & Video Chronology — March 27, 2025 — Aftermath of Kīlauea summit eruption episode 15

    Source: US Geological Survey

    Photo & Video Chronology — March 27, 2025 — Aftermath of Kīlauea summit eruption episode 15

    Views of the eruption area at Kīlauea summit following episode 15, and additional videos of lava fountaining during episodes 14 and 15. 

    Get Our News

    These items are in the RSS feed format (Really Simple Syndication) based on categories such as topics, locations, and more. You can install and RSS reader browser extension, software, or use a third-party service to receive immediate news updates depending on the feed that you have added. If you click the feed links below, they may look strange because they are simply XML code. An RSS reader can easily read this code and push out a notification to you when something new is posted to our site.

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI China: J.D. Vance arrives in Greenland amid criticism over uninvited visit

    Source: China State Council Information Office

    U.S. Vice President J.D. Vance and his wife Usha arrived Friday at Pituffik Space Base in Greenland, an autonomous territory of Denmark.

    Ahead of Vance’s arrival, the visit drew criticism from political leaders and public figures in both Denmark and Greenland, who denounced the trip as “uninvited” and “provocative”.

    MIL OSI China News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Senator Rosen Denounces Trump’s Appointment of Sigal Chattah as Interim U.S. Attorney for the District of Nevada

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Jacky Rosen (D-NV)

    WASHINGTON, DC – Today, U.S. Senator Jacky Rosen (D-NV) issued the following statement in response to President Donald Trump naming Sigal Chattah as the interim U.S. Attorney for the District of Nevada:
    “Nevada needs a U.S. Attorney who will uphold and enforce the law fairly and equally. Sigal Chattah is an extremist who is deeply unfit for this role,” said Senator Rosen. “Chattah’s disturbing past statements promising to use any public office to go after her political opponents, as well as her well-documented history of racist remarks, conspiracy theories, and threats of violence, prove that she cannot be trusted with this important responsibility. If she’s ever nominated to a permanent Senate-confirmed position, I’ll do everything in my power to block her confirmation.”

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Ernst on Justice for Sarah Root

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Joni Ernst (R-IA)

    WASHINGTON – One week ago today – after nearly a decade of work by U.S. Senator Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) to bring closure for the Root family – Sarah Root’s killer, an illegal immigrant who escaped due to a loophole in the law, was delivered into U.S. custody to face justice.
    Since Sarah Root was killed in 2016, Ernst has been advocating to bring her killer to justice alongside Sarah’s parents, Michelle and Scott Root. This year, President Trump made Ernst’s Sarah’s Law the law of the land to help ensure this never happens to another family.

    Watch Senator Ernst and Michelle Root’s full interview with KCCI here.
    “‘I was in disbelief. I had come to the fact that I would probably not see justice in my lifetime for my daughter’… [Michelle] Root credits Iowa Senator Joni Ernst. ‘Senator Ernst has become like family to us.’ Earlier this year, Congress passed the Laken Riley Act, which includes Sarah’s Law. Ernst says it requires authorities to detain any undocumented immigrant who commits a crime resulting in death or serious injury. With Sarah’s Law in place and Mejia awaiting trial. Root says she’s closer to finding closure. ‘Those two things were what we had been fighting for the last nine years. We will never get closure until we meet Sarah again, of course, but it closes that chapter.’”

    KCSI | Ernst Remembers Root Family as Sarah Root’s Killer is Now in U.S. Custody
    “I know there are a ton of people to thank about this, but I need to because we’re with Senator Ernst and as you said, she has brought from the beginning to get Sarah’s Law passed. I could not have asked for a better person by our side fighting with us and for us… Even when I wanted to quit, she kept going.”

    Watch Senator Ernst’s full interview  here.
    “This has been nine years in the making. It was nine years ago, at the end of January, on her college graduation day, that young Sarah Root was killed by an illegal immigrant… Thanks to the Trump administration, thank you to Secretary Noem and Secretary Rubio. We were able to locate this illegal migrant who had killed Sarah Root, and they were able to bring him back to face justice. So it means a lot to me, but especially means a lot to her parents, Michelle Root and Scott Root of Council Bluffs, Iowa.”
     
    Watch Senator Ernst’s full Newsmax interview here.
    “President Donald Trump wanted to do something about it. He never forgot about Sarah Root. And finally, now this man is going through the U.S. judicial system, and he will be held to account for the killing of sweet Sarah Root, who was only 21 years old when she was killed nine years ago.”
    Print Coverage of Ernst’s Advocacy:
    Council Bluffs Nonpareil | Sarah Root’s alleged killer extradited from Honduras to Omaha
    “In a Friday evening press call, Sen. Joni Ernst announced she had just left Eppley Airfield in Omaha, where Eswin Mejia was taken into U.S. custody. He is being held in the Douglas County Jail in Nebraska as he awaits trial in Root’s death.”
    “Ernst called the case a long-fought battle that has spanned nearly a decade, praising the Trump administration for acting to ‘prevent this from happening to someone else’s daughter’ while rebuking the Biden administration for removing Mejia from ICE’s Most Wanted list.”
    KWQC | Alleged killer of Iowan Sarah Root extradited from Honduras
    “Republican U.S. Sen. Joni Ernst from Iowa, who worked for nine years to pass Sarah’s Law, praised President Donald Trump for extraditing Mejia.”
    Omaha World Herald | Honduran man accused in fatal 2016 crash extradited to Omaha, held on $100 million bail
    “[Ernst is] incredibly thankful for President Trump’s strong action, his hardworking administration and steadfast partnership to right this wrong on behalf of Iowa families.”
    Radio Iowa | Honduran charged with 2016 murder of Iowan extradited to Omaha
    “The first bill Trump signed into law this year includes what’s called ‘Sarah’s Law.’ It requires authorities to detain any illegal immigrant who is accused of murdering or seriously injuring someone in the U.S. Ernst and other members of Iowa’s congressional delegation had sponsored the legislation for the past eight years.”
    KCRG| Senator Ernst applauds Trump admin following the extradition of Sarah Root’s murderer
    “Since this incident, Senator Ernst has been actively fighting for justice for the Root family. ‘For over nine years, I have called for justice on behalf of Sarah Root, and today President Trump and his administration are delivering. Sarah should still be alive today, and for too long Michelle, Scott, and the rest of her loved ones have been forced to live with the fact that her killer was running free.’”
    KETV| Man accused in Omaha motor vehicle homicide that earned national attention to be extradited to United States
    “After years of trying to get the bill passed in both chambers of Congress, ‘Sarah’s Law’ was signed by Speaker Mike Johnson and made its way to President Donald Trump’s desk. U.S. Sen. Joni Ernst spearheaded the effort.”
    Breitbart | Trump Administration Secures Extradition of Illegal Alien Accused of Killing 21-Year-Old Sarah Root
    “Ernst has worked for years on Root’s case, including working with the Trump administration on Mejia’s extradition. In January, Trump signed Sarah’s Law, authored by Ernst, into federal law which will require illegal aliens who commit violent crimes to remain detained in police custody.”
    KIOW| Ernst on the Apprehension of Eswin Mejia
    “Senator Joni Ernst has continually fought for the apprehension and extradition of Mejia to the United States. She was at the airport when Mejia landed on U. S. soil and was taken into custody.”
    WOWT | $100 million bond set for man charged in 2016 Omaha street racing crash that killed Sarah Root
    “The fact that Mejia was able to bond out and subsequently flee the U.S. led Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) to create ‘Sarah’s Law,’ named after Root, which requires illegal immigrants who have committed violent crimes against Americans to be detained regardless of bail status.”
    KFJB | ESWIN MEJIA TO STAND TRIAL NEARLY A DECADE AFTER THE KILLING OF SARAH ROOTS
    “Trump met with Root’s mother and her father, Scott Root, in mid-2016 and Trump talked about their daughter’s death on the campaign trail. The first bill Trump signed into law this year includes what’s called ‘Sarah’s Law.’ It requires authorities to detain any illegal immigrant who is accused of murdering or seriously injuring someone in the U.S. Ernst and other members of Iowa’s congressional delegation had sponsored the legislation for the past eight years.”
    TV Coverage of Ernst’s Advocacy:

    Watch KETV’s coverage here.
    “Senator Joni Ernst has been a champion for Sarah and her family, and her efforts and leadership were crucial in Mejia’s extradition.”
    “The story gained national attention after Congress passed Sarah’s Law. It requires police to detain an undocumented immigrant who commits a crime resulting in death or injury.”

    Watch KCCI’s coverage  here.
    “He is now in jail in Omaha…finally, Edwin Mejia will face long overdue consequence after breaking our laws and taking an innocent life.”

    Watch KCRG’s coverage  here.
    “U.S. Senator Joni Ernst worked for nine years to pass Sarah’s Law. That was an amendment to the Laken Riley Act…Ernst released a statement thanking the Trump administration for the work to extradite Mejia.”

    Watch KTIV’s coverage here.
    “The case inspired lawmakers to craft Sarah’s Law, which was recently signed into law by President Trump as part of the Laken Riley Act. Tonight, one of the lawmakers who led that legislation, Iowa Senator Joni Ernst, celebrated the news that Mejia will finally stand trial.”

    Watch KWQC’s coverage here.
    “Sarah’s family helped pass a law in her honor, requiring immigrants to be detained if they’re involved with the death or serious injury of another person.”
    “Iowa Senator Joni Ernst has demanded justice for Root’s death since she died in 2016. Today, she celebrated a milestone moment in her quest for justice, saying, ‘finally, Edwin Mejia will face the long overdue consequences after breaking our laws and taking an innocent life. I’m incredibly thankful for President Trump’s strong action, his hardworking administration and steadfast partnership to right this wrong on behalf of Iowa families.’”

    Watch One America News’ coverage  here.
    “Iowa Senator Joni Ernst became a leading voice in the fight for justice for Root as the family came from Iowa.”

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: SPC Mar 29, 2025 0100 UTC Day 1 Convective Outlook

    Source: US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

    SPC AC 290045

    Day 1 Convective Outlook
    NWS Storm Prediction Center Norman OK
    0745 PM CDT Fri Mar 28 2025

    Valid 290100Z – 291200Z

    …THERE IS A MARGINAL RISK OF SEVERE THUNDERSTORMS THIS EVENING
    ACROSS PARTS OF CENTRAL WISCONSIN…SOUTHERN
    MINNESOTA…NORTHWESTERN IOWA…NORTHEASTERN INTO CENTRAL
    NEBRASKA…AND PARTS OF SOUTHEASTERN TEXAS INTO WESTERN LOUISIANA…

    …SUMMARY…
    Isolated to widely scattered strong to severe thunderstorm
    development is still possible this evening across parts of the Upper
    Midwest into central Great Plains.

    …01Z Update…
    In the wake of southern mid- to subtropical latitude mid-level
    troughing slowly progressing east-northeast of the southeastern
    Great Plains/northwestern Gulf Basin vicinity, and downstream of
    low-amplitude mid-level troughing emerging from the mid-latitude
    Pacific, a narrow plume of elevated mixed-layer air has overspread a
    corridor from the southern high plains through the Upper Midwest.
    Beneath this regime, low-level moisture return remains modest,
    particularly to the north of the southern Great Plains Red River
    Valley.

    …Great Plains into Great Lakes
    Due to the pronounced mid-level inhibition, thunderstorm development
    through much of the day remained confined to areas well to the north
    of a sharp quasi-stationary frontal zone across the Upper
    Mississippi Valley into lower Great Lakes region. However,
    thunderstorm activity has recently initiated, and continues to
    increase in coverage, in closer proximity to the front, across parts
    of southern Minnesota into central Wisconsin. While some of this
    has initiated in the more strongly heated boundary-layer to the
    south of the front, this is likely to be either fairly quickly
    become undercut by the front, where the front is beginning to
    advance southward, or become focused in forcing associated with
    low-level warm to the immediate north of the front, farther east.
    CAPE for the elevated moist parcels might be as high as 500-1000
    J/kg, which may continue to support a risk for small to marginally
    severe hail in stronger storms through this evening.

    Southwestward into the Great Plains, latest satellite imagery
    suggest that there still may be a window of opportunity for
    thunderstorm initiation within the pre-frontal surface troughing
    across parts of northeastern through south central Nebraska early
    this evening. Given the warm/dry sub-cloud air, a few strong gusts
    may accompany this activity before boundary-layer cooling diminishes
    this potential later this evening.

    ..Kerr.. 03/29/2025

    CLICK TO GET WUUS01 PTSDY1 PRODUCT

    NOTE: THE NEXT DAY 1 OUTLOOK IS SCHEDULED BY 0600Z

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: SPC MD 279

    Source: US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

    Mesoscale Discussion 279

    Mesoscale Discussion 0279
    NWS Storm Prediction Center Norman OK
    0725 PM CDT Fri Mar 28 2025

    Areas affected…Southern Minnesota…far northwest…Iowa…and far
    northeast Nebraska

    Concerning…Severe potential…Watch unlikely

    Valid 290025Z – 290230Z

    Probability of Watch Issuance…5 percent

    SUMMARY…A couple strong to severe storms capable of producing
    locally damaging wind gusts (around 60 mph) and marginally severe
    hail (around 1 inch) are possible through around 03Z.

    DISCUSSION…Isolated thunderstorms are evolving along a
    northeast/southwest-oriented cold front extending from southern MN
    into far northeast IA and northeast NE. Earlier diurnal heating
    beneath an EML plume has resulted in steep deep-layer lapse rates
    and around 1000 J/kg MLCAPE along the front. While instability is
    marginal, 30-40 kt of effective shear oriented parallel/oblique to
    the surface front will support small, loosely organized clusters
    capable of producing locally damaging winds gusts (around 60 mph)
    and marginally severe hail (around 1 inch) for the next few hours.
    Given the flow orientation to the southeastward-moving cold front,
    there may be a tendency for upscale growth into a line, before being
    undercut by the front. Therefore, any severe risk is expected to
    remain fairly brief (through around 02-03Z).

    ..Weinman/Mosier.. 03/29/2025

    …Please see www.spc.noaa.gov for graphic product…

    ATTN…WFO…ARX…MPX…DMX…FSD…OAX…

    LAT…LON 42769743 43589589 44159453 44619270 44539214 44099222
    43649401 43249506 42339688 42489738 42769743

    MOST PROBABLE PEAK WIND GUST…UP TO 60 MPH
    MOST PROBABLE PEAK HAIL SIZE…UP TO 1.25 IN

    Top/All Mesoscale Discussions/Forecast Products/Home

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: SPC – No watches are valid as of Sat Mar 29 02:01:01 UTC 2025

    Source: US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

    Current Convective Watches (View What is a Watch? clip)Updated:  Sat Mar 29 02:05:06 UTC 2025 No watches are currently valid

    Archived Convective ProductsTo view convective products for a previous day, type in the date you wish to retrieve (e.g. 20040529 for May 29, 2004). Data available since January 1, 2004.

    MIL OSI USA News –