Category: Americas

  • MIL-OSI: Alliance Witan PLC – Final Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Alliance Witan PLC (‘the Company’)
    LEI: 213800SZZD4E2IOZ9W55

    7 March 2025

    A landmark year

    Annual results for the year ended 31 December 2024

    Highlights

    • 2024 was a landmark year for the Company, which was promoted to the FTSE 100 after the combination with Witan Investment Trust Plc (‘Witan’).
    • The Company’s share price was 1,244 pence (£12.44) as of 31 December 2024, representing a Share Price Total Return1 of 14.3%.
    • The Company’s Net Asset Value Total Return1 of 13.3%, while strongly positive, trailed our benchmark index, the MSCI All Country World Index (‘MSCI ACWI’), which returned 19.6%.
    • The Company’s average discount narrowed to 4.7% from 5.4% at the end of 2023, which compared favourably with the average discount for the Association of Investment Company’s Global Sector of 7.9%.
    • A fourth interim dividend 6.73p per share was declared on 28 January 2025, bringing the total dividend for the year ended 31 December 2024 to 26.70p per share. This is a 6% increase on the previous year, the 58th consecutive annual increase.

    Dean Buckley, Chair of Alliance Witan, commented:

    “The Company delivered strong outright gains for shareholders in 2024, although in common with most active global equity strategies, we underperformed our benchmark index, MSCI ACWI, where performance was concentrated in a handful of the largest US companies. Even so, the Company’s longer-term performance remains competitive, and demand for our shares was healthy last year, with the Company’s discount narrowing, bucking the industry trend towards widening discounts. We also increased our dividend for the 58th consecutive year.

    “Thanks to the support of both sets of shareholders, we achieved a historic combination with Witan, which places the Company in a strong position to realise economies of scale and offer better liquidity for our shares. With solid performance and a refreshed brand, supported by a marketing campaign that will continue in 2025, the Board is confident that the Company is well placed to continue delivering attractive returns for shareholders”.

    About Alliance Witan PLC

    Alliance Witan aims to be a core investment that beats inflation over the long term through a combination of capital growth and rising dividend. The Company invests in global equities across a wide range of different sectors and industries to achieve its objective. Alliance Witan’s portfolio uses a distinctive multi-manager approach. We blend the top stock selections of some of the world’s best active managers into a single diversified portfolio designed to outperform the market while carefully managing risk. Alliance Witan is an AIC Dividend Hero with 58 consecutive years of rising dividends.

    https://www.alliancewitan.com

    For more information, please contact:

    For more information, please contact:
    Mark Atkinson
    Senior Director
    Client Management, Wealth & Retail
      Sarah Gibbons-Cook
    Director
    Willis Towers Watson   Quill PR
    Tel: 07918 724303   Tel: 07702 412680
    mark.atkinson@wtwco.com   AllianceWitan@quillpr.com

    1. Alternative Performance Measure. Share Price Total Return is the return to shareholders through share price capital returns and dividends paid by the Company and re-invested. Net Asset Value (NAV) Total Return is a measure of the performance of the Company’s NAV over a specified time period. It combines any change in the NAV and dividends paid.

    Financial highlights as at 31 December 2024

    Net Assets Net Asset Value (‘NAV’) per Share
    £5.2bn 1,304.9p
    (2023: £3.3bn) (2023: 1,175.1p)
       
    NAV Total Return1 Share Price
    +13.3% 1,244.0p
    (2023: +21.6%) (2023: 1,112.0p)
       
    Share Price Total Return1 Discount to NAV1
    +14.3% -4.7%
    (2023: +20.2%) (2023: -5.4%)
       
    Earnings per Share (Revenue) Total Dividend per Share
    17.3p 26.7p
    (2023: 18.6p) (2023: 25.2p)

    1. Alternative Performance Measure – see page 116 of the Annual Report for further information.
    Notes:
    NAV per Share including income with debt at fair value.
    NAV Total Return based on NAV including income with debt at fair value and after all costs.
    Source: Morningstar and Juniper Partners Limited (‘Juniper’).

    Chair’s Statement

    • Landmark combination with Witan
    • Another strong year for equities
    • 58th consecutive annual dividend increase
    • Discount narrower than the AIC Global Sector average
    • Named by the AIC as a top 20 best performing investment trust over ten years1

    2024 was a landmark year for your Company. I would like to begin by thanking you for your support for the combination of Alliance Trust and Witan to form Alliance Witan and by welcoming all shareholders who have joined us as a result. This was a pivotal moment in our history, achieving economies of scale and elevating the Company to the FTSE 100. Now, as one of the industry’s leaders, this status will provide better liquidity for our shares and, with good long term investment performance and a strong brand, help us attract new investors. We made a number of commitments to investors as part of the proposals, for example in respect of dividends and costs, and you will see as you read through the Annual Report how we have achieved each of these.

    As I mentioned in the Interim Report for the six months ended 30 June 2024, there has been no change to the Company’s investment strategy, just a larger pool of assets for our Investment Manager, WTW, to manage with the same professionalism that it has brought to the job since April 2017.

    1. https://www.theaic.co.uk/aic/news/press-releases/top-20-best-performing-investment-trusts-for-your-isa

    Investment Performance

    It was another good year for global equity markets, and your Company delivered strong absolute returns. NAV Total Return was 13.3% and, due to a narrowing of the discount, Share Price Total Return was 14.3%. However, we lagged our benchmark index, the MSCI All Country World Index (‘MSCI ACWI’ or ‘Index’), which returned 19.6%. We also marginally underperformed our peers in the AIC Global Sector, which is disappointing, but we were slightly ahead of the much wider, more representative Morningstar peer group of open and closed-ended global equity funds.

    Simply put, our relative performance in 2024 suffered from not having enough exposure to the small number of very large companies that dominated market returns, especially in the US.

    The narrowness of returns from global equity markets has been a common problem for all active managers in recent years, and we take comfort from the fact that, despite this persistent headwind, we are ahead of the Index and have significantly outperformed both peer groups over three years. You can read more about the contributors/detractors to the Company’s investment performance during 2024 in the Investment Manager’s Report on page 9 of the Annual Report.

    Dividend increased for the 58thconsecutive year

    The Board declared a fourth interim dividend of 6.73p per share on 28 January 2025, resulting in a full year dividend of 26.70p, an increase of 6.0% on the prior year. This fulfils the promise we made at the time of the combination of Alliance Trust and Witan to increase dividends for the legacy shareholders of both companies. 2024’s increase marks the 58th consecutive annual increase, which is one of the longest track records in the investment trust industry. Dividends are well supported by revenue and reserves, and the Board is confident annual dividend increases can continue well into the future. Due to our steady approach, the Company has received a ‘Dividend Hero’ investment company award from the Association of Investment Companies (‘AIC’).

    Narrowing discount

    Many investment trusts continued to trade on large discounts to NAV throughout 2024, with the industry average widening to 14.7% from 12.7%.1 I am pleased to report that your Company fared better than most, with its average discount falling to 4.7% from 5.4% over the year. This compared favourably with the average discount for the AIC Global Sector of 7.9%.

    Your Board remains committed to the maintenance of a stable discount. We will continue to use share buybacks as appropriate and invest in promotional activity to widen our shareholder base, to support the management of the discount. During 2024, the Company bought back 4.7 million shares (1.2% of shares in issue2), versus 8.6 million repurchased in 2023. The shares bought back during the year were placed in Treasury. This level of buybacks was significantly below that of our peers, in a year in which industry-wide buybacks hit a record level of £7.5 billion3. The shares held in Treasury can be reissued by the Company at a premium to estimated NAV when there is market demand.

    Board changes

    Following the completion of the combination of Alliance Trust with Witan, we welcomed four new Non-Executive Directors to the Board: Andrew Ross, Rachel Beagles, Shauna Bevan and Jack Perry, all of whom were former directors of Witan.

    Clare Dobie, having served for almost nine years, is retiring as a Director at the conclusion of this year’s Annual General Meeting (‘AGM’), as is Jack Perry, reducing the size of the Board to eight members.

    On behalf of the Board, I would like to thank Clare and Jack for their contributions.

    Annual General Meeting

    The Board looks forward to being able to meet shareholders again at this year’s AGM, which will be held at the Apex City Quay Hotel in Dundee on 1 May 2025. For those shareholders who are not able to attend in person, we will be live streaming the event. As well as the formal business of the meeting, there will be an investor forum afterwards featuring two of our Stock Pickers, Jennison and EdgePoint, as well as members of WTW’s investment team. There will be another in-person investor forum in London in the autumn. In addition, shareholders can engage with the Company and its Stock Pickers via online presentations during the year. Further details of how to attend all these events can be found on the website.

    The Board would strongly encourage shareholders to use the opportunity to have their say and use their vote at the AGM. Further information on the arrangements for the AGM, including information on how to vote either directly through the Registrar or though different platforms, is on pages 134 and 135 of the Annual Report.

    Keep up-to-date

    In these unusual times, the website will provide timely updates to shareholders. Therefore, I would encourage you to visit the website which contains a vast amount of information on investment performance, details of shareholder meetings and investor forums, monthly factsheets, quarterly newsletters, and Stock Picker updates, as well as the Annual and Interim Reports.

    As always, the Board welcomes communication from shareholders and I can be contacted through Juniper Partners (‘Juniper’), the Company Secretary at investor@alliancewitan.com.

    Outlook

    Since the start of President Trump’s second term of office in January, tariffs have created uncertainty about the outlook for equities. Diplomatic tensions over efforts to end the war in Ukraine and conflict in Gaza have also raised geopolitical risks. Furthermore, European bond markets are adjusting to the prospect of increased borrowing to fund higher levels of defence and infrastructure spending.

    While there is a risk that heightened levels of uncertainty will impact on business and consumer confidence, global growth and corporate earnings forecasts are currently healthy, giving some grounds for cautious optimism, about further gains for shareholders, especially if there is a broadening out of market leadership.

    While the Index is highly concentrated, your portfolio has broader exposure to many good businesses that have not yet received the market recognition our Stock Pickers believe they deserve.

    The portfolio will not always outperform the market in every discrete period, but we believe it will continue to add significant value for shareholders in the long run.

    I look forward to meeting as many of you as possible at the AGM in Dundee or the next investor forum in London.

    1. Weighted average discount (excluding 3i Group). Source: Winterflood.
    2. Percentage based on the Company’s issued share capital (excluding shares held in Treasury) as at 1 January 2025.
    3. Source: AIC and Morningstar.

    Dean Buckley
    Chair
    6 March 2025

    Combination with Witan

    The most significant development during the year under review was the combination of the Company with Witan.

    Background

    Following a comprehensive review of management arrangements, the Witan Board concluded that a combination with the Company was in the best interests of Witan’s shareholders. Amongst other things this allowed them continued exposure to a successful multi-manager approach.

    The combination was undertaken by way of a scheme of reconstruction and members’ voluntary liquidation of Witan. The scheme required the approval of both the Company and Witan’s shareholders and took effect on 10 October 2024. It resulted in the Company acquiring approximately £1,539 million of net assets from Witan in consideration for the issue of new ordinary shares to Witan shareholders. The name of the Company became Alliance Witan and the stock exchange ticker ALW.

    Outcome

    The combination was expected to result in substantial benefits for all shareholders and future investors. The outcomes of the key elements of the proposals include:

    • Greater profile and FTSE 100 inclusion: the Company has assets of over £5 billion and is now a FTSE 100 Index constituent.
    • Lower management fees: WTW agreed a new management fee structure; this resulted in an even more competitive blended fee rate for all shareholders.
    • Lower ongoing charges: the new management fee structure and economies of scale have reduced ongoing charges to 0.56% (net of the management fee waiver).
    • No cost to either companies’ shareholders: the costs of the transaction were carefully managed, including the fee waiver from WTW, to ensure that the transaction was completed at no cost to all shareholders.
    • Attractive and progressive dividend policy: the third and fourth interim dividend payments of 2024 were increased to ensure that they were commensurate with Witan’s first interim dividend. It is expected that the dividend will continue to increase in the current year so that shareholders continue to see progression in their income.

    Portfolio Transition

    • The Company received assets including cash and equities from Witan and the Witan loan notes were novated to the Company. Details are provided in note 13 to the Financial Statements.
    • BlackRock Investment Management (UK) Limited managed the portfolio transition. Direct costs of the portfolio transition and Manager changes were less than 0.04% of the Net Asset Value of the enlarged portfolio.

    Investment Manager’s Report

    Market backdrop: equities untroubled by politics

    For the second year running, global equities delivered strong returns in 2024, with economics trumping politics. Despite a record number of elections, conflicts in the Middle East and Ukraine reaching new heights, and a scary moment in Japan when the Nikkei Index of the top 225 blue-chip shares plunged 12% in a day at the beginning of August, investors focused on resilient global growth, falling inflation and interest rates, and healthy corporate profitability.

    Hence, our benchmark index, the MSCI ACWI, returned 19.6% in 2024 following a return of 15.3% in 2023. Since 1987, the Index has returned an average of 8.4% per annum1, so returns of this magnitude in two consecutive years are rare. The ebullient mood of equity investors was reflected in a surge in the prices of less established assets, such as cryptocurrency, with Bitcoin reaching all-time highs of over $100,000. Peanut the Squirrel Coin, a cryptocurrency named after the eponymous pet that New York environmental authorities seized and euthanised on 30 October 2024, at one point commanded a market cap of $1.7 billion.

    However, regional equity market performance was mixed. US markets once again led the way, with the S&P 500 delivering a 27% return when measured in British pounds. Chinese equities rallied briefly following government stimulus, but concerns over the country’s property market and trade tensions persisted. Together with a strong US dollar, these worries led to more subdued returns from emerging markets, which rose about 9%. In Japan, August’s technically driven decline proved temporary, and the Nikkei resumed its ascent to close the year at a record high, although the yen’s depreciation reduced returns for UK-based investors when converted into British pounds. The UK and European markets were more muted, with the FTSE All Share Index and the MSCI Europe ex UK Index returning 9.5% and 1.9% respectively.

    Gains driven by US tech giants

    Giant US technology related stocks were the standout performers, fuelled by investor excitement about generative artificial intelligence (‘AI’) and, from November onwards, hopes that Donald Trump’s victory in the presidential election would weaken regulatory scrutiny. The share prices of the so called “Magnificent Seven” – Apple, Amazon, Alphabet, Meta, Microsoft, NVIDIA and Tesla – increased by 60% on average and were responsible for 43% of MSCI ACWI’s gains. This was less than 2023 when they contributed 53%, but still a huge number emphasising the extreme concentration of index returns in a small number of companies.

    Even so, from mid-year onwards, returns were no longer quite as skewed to the performance of a handful of shares. Although NVIDIA and Tesla returned a massive 176% and 65% respectively, giant tech was not the only game in town. Financial stocks returned 26.5%, and returns from the consumer discretionary, industrial and utility sectors were also well into double figures, pointing to the potential broadening out of market returns as stock-specific drivers came to the fore.

    1. https://www.msci.com/documents/10199/8d97d244-4685-4200-a24c-3e2942e3adeb

    Portfolio performance: strong absolute gains but lagged benchmark index

    Our portfolio’s NAV Total Return was a robust 13.3% but, as with most active managers, it lagged the Company’s benchmark index. The portfolio does, however, remain ahead of the Index over three years (28.0% vs 26.8%), albeit behind over five years (64.7% vs 70.8%). Disappointing though it was not to beat the MSCI ACWI in 2024, we were not alone. AJ Bell calculated that, to the end of November, just 18% of active global equity funds outperformed their passive peers, largely due to their inability to match high Index weightings in the “Magnificent Seven”. The sheer size of these companies in the Index is mind boggling. NVIDIA, Microsoft and Apple, for example, represent 13% of the MSCI ACWI as at 31 December 2024 and, together, are bigger than the entire stock markets of several sizeable countries.

    The skew of the Index towards mega-cap companies has been a challenge, to varying degrees, since the start of our multi-manager strategy in April 2017. As a broadly diversified strategy, with capital spread between 8-12 Managers, all with different approaches to investing, our portfolio naturally has a structural bias away from stocks that on rare occasions represent such a large proportion of our global benchmark. While we have some exposure to most of the “Magnificent Seven”, it would require a lot of the Managers to choose them as one of their best ideas for us to be at Index weight, never mind be overweight.

    The Index may have been hard to beat in recent years, but market concentration poses significant risks for passive strategies. At the end of 2024, the Index on average allocated around 150 times as much capital to each of Apple, NVIDIA and Microsoft as it did to the average stock, akin to us placing about 95% of the portfolio in one manager’s hands and 0.5% each in the other ten.

    We do not believe this is the right way to manage risk for shareholders, bearing in mind that index trackers are not investing lots of money in these companies because they are good businesses trading at good valuations, but because they are very big. If US large-cap stocks continue to dominate, tracker funds may continue to outperform active funds. But if sentiment on the technology sector turns sour, passive funds with big stakes will be hit much harder.

    Not owning enough NVIDIA was painful

    The strong outperformance of our portfolio versus our benchmark in 2023 continued into the first quarter of 2024, when the biggest contribution came from not owning, at that time, poorly performing Tesla and Apple. But thereafter stock selection became more challenging, particularly within the “Magnificent Seven”. Although we benefitted from owning Amazon and Microsoft, we moved from an overweight to an underweight position in NVIDIA in the first quarter after its extraordinary outperformance, which then made it our biggest single detractor last year as that outperformance continued. Having helped us in the first quarter, the lack of exposure to Tesla and Apple, which both recovered strongly as the year progressed, counted against us from then on. Overall, our positions in the “Magnificent Seven” accounted for a third of the portfolio’s underperformance versus the Index in 2024.

    The remainder of the portfolio’s underperformance came from a combination of being underweight in large-cap stocks in general and stock specific issues elsewhere, in some cases due to partial reversals of performance in 2023. For example, stock selection in financials detracted in large part due to our relative lack of exposure to strongly performing US banks such as JP Morgan and Goldman Sachs. In the consumer discretionary sector, the share price of UK-based drinks company Diageo, owned by Veritas Asset Management (‘Veritas’) and Metropolis Capital (‘Metropolis’), continued to suffer from a post-Covid cyclical downturn, falling 8.5%, although both Managers believe the company will eventually recover lost ground when structural trends reassert themselves. Novo Nordisk, the Danish weight loss drugs company, was another notable detractor, as its shares fell 14% after disappointing test results. Our Stock Pickers see this as a temporary decline in a growing market in which Novo Nordisk has a leading position. Hence, it was one of our biggest purchases in 2024 (see table below).

    Indeed, our Stock Pickers express a high degree of confidence in the latent value of many of their holdings. By far the most important long run ingredient underpinning share price performance is strong fundamentals, such as market-leading products or services, solid profit margins, plentiful cashflow and strong management.

    Top 10 purchases and sales

    Top 10 purchases Value £m   Top 10 sales Value £m
    UnitedHealth Group 50.2   Alphabet 84.3
    Novo Nordisk 48.8   NVIDIA 71.3
    Synopsys 47.5   Fiserv 39.0
    Microsoft 45.0   Aena 37.9
    Netflix 41.5   Ebara 36.1
    Philip Morris 41.4   TotalEnergies 35.0
    Enbridge 39.4   PayPal 33.8
    AT&T 39.0   Bureau Veritas 33.4
    American Electric Power 37.3   KKR 33.2
    Eli Lilly 36.6   Taiwan Semiconductor 32.2

    Source: Juniper.
    The purchases and sales are calculated by taking the net value of all transactions (buy and sells) for each holding held within the portfolio over the period. The tables exclude any non-equity holdings such as ETFs and any transfers from the combination with Witan.

    Even so, in the short run, market sentiment can have a larger impact on share prices than fundamentals. When we break down the portfolio performance against the Index into fundamentals and sentiment, the portfolio’s strong absolute performance has been mainly as a result of company fundamentals, whereas the Index’s absolute performance has been more driven by market sentiment.

    A full breakdown of the contributors to our Total Return in 2024 is shown in the following table.

    Contribution analysis

    Contribution to Return in 2024 %
    Benchmark Total Return 19.6
    Asset Allocation -1.1
    Stock Selection -5.3
    Gearing and Cash 0.6
    Investment Manager Impact -5.8
    Portfolio Total Return 13.8
    Share Buybacks 0.1
    Fees/Expenses -0.6
    Taxation -0.1
    Change in Fair Value of Debt 0.4
    Timing Differences -0.2
    NAV Total Return including Income, Debt at Fair Value 13.3
    Change in Discount 1.0
    Share Price Total Return 14.3

    Source: Performance and attribution data sourced from WTW, Juniper, MSCI Inc, FactSet and Morningstar as at 31 December 2024. Percentages may not add due to rounding.

    In the table below, we also list the top five contributors and detractors to portfolio performance during the year relative to the portfolio’s benchmark.

    Sands, Vulcan and Lyrical were the top performers

    As we would expect from such a diverse line up, performance among our Managers was mixed. This is by design, as we do not want the portfolio to be biased towards any one approach of investing, which might make returns vulnerable to a sudden switch from one style to another. This happened in 2022 when growth stocks began to suffer significantly as central banks raised interest rates to combat inflation. Sands Capital (‘Sands’), Vulcan Value Partners (‘Vulcan’), and Lyrical Asset Management (‘Lyrical’) were the top performers last year. Sands and Vulcan both benefitted from owning tech giants. Sands held NVIDIA while Vulcan held Amazon, but Sands’ largest contributor to relative performance was Axon Enterprise, an industrial business which makes tasers, body cameras and other software products. Its share price surged by 134% last year.

    Top five stock contributors to performance

    Stock Sector Country Average Active Weight (%) Total Return in Sterling (%) Attribution Effect Relative to Benchmark (%)
    Amazon Consumer Discretionary United States 1.0 47.0 0.2
    Axon Enterprise Industrials United States 0.2 134.2 0.2
    Salesforce Information Technology United States 0.4 29.8 0.2
    NRG Energy Utilities United States 0.4 80.6 0.2
    Nestle Consumer Staples Switzerland -0.4 -25.9 0.2

    Bottom five stock detractors to performance

    Stock Sector Country Average Active Weight (%) Total Return in Sterling (%) Attribution Effect Relative to Benchmark (%)
    NVIDIA Information Technology United States -1.8 176.1 -1.2
    Broadcom Information Technology United States -0.5 113.4 -0.6
    Novo Nordisk Health Care Denmark 0.8 -14.0 -0.6
    Tesla Consumer Discretionary United States -0.8 65.4 -0.6
    Apple Information Technology United States -3.9 32.8 -0.4

    Source: WTW.

    The tables above illustrate the top five contributors and detractors to returns relative to benchmark in 2024. It aims to explain at a stock level which companies drove relative returns. For example, the Alliance Witan portfolio was underweight relative to benchmark in NVIDIA, Broadcom, Tesla and Apple. These stocks had very strong returns, which hurt our portfolio’s relative performance. Conversely, not having an exposure to Nestle helped our relative performance given the stock was held in the benchmark and was down over the year. Our overweight position in Amazon, Axon Enterprise, Salesforce and NRG Energy contributed positively to relative returns given their strong performance. The average active weight is the arithmetic simple average weight of the stock in the portfolio minus the arithmetic simple average weight of the stock in the benchmark over the period.

    Vulcan’s largest contributor to our performance was KKR, the US-based private equity group, which returned 82%, prompting Vulcan to take profits. Its holding in Salesforce also did well, rising nearly 30%.

    Lyrical, a deep-value style investor, benefitted from owning several less talked-about US-based companies, which all rebounded from cheap valuations. These included NRG Energy, Ameriprise Financials and eBay.

    Of our Managers, the most notable laggard was Sustainable Growth Advisors (‘SGA’), which was disappointing given its focus on large cap growth stocks which, as a group, had the strongest price momentum. SGA suffered from holding Novo Nordisk, and two of its other positions, ICON and Synopsys also stood out as detractors. The recent poor performance of SGA follows a long period of outperformance, so returns since we appointed SGA remain strong. Value Managers Metropolis and ARGA Investment Management (‘ARGA’), the latter replacing Jupiter Asset Management (‘Jupiter’) in April, also struggled in the recent market environment, which has generally favoured growth managers.

    Portfolio changes: two new Managers added after combination with Witan

    As well as adding ARGA for Jupiter in the first half of the year, following Ben Whitmore’s decision to leave Jupiter to set up his own business, there were two further changes to the Manager line-up during the integration of Witan’s portfolio. Altogether, this contributed to an unusually high level of turnover of 98.5% of the portfolio in 2024. Both Alliance Trust and Witan already had GQG Partners (‘GQG’) and Veritas in common, which meant that there were some in-specie transfers of stocks. Additionally, the combination of Alliance and Witan presented us with an opportunity to introduce Jennison Associates (‘Jennison’) to the portfolio at a low cost.

    Based in the US, Jennison specialises in investing in innovative, fast-growing businesses. It had been one of Witan’s most successful managers and blending it with our other Managers increased the diversity of holdings in growth companies. We also took the opportunity to replace Black Creek Investment Management (‘Black Creek’) with EdgePoint Investment Group (‘EdgePoint’), while we were using a transition manager to keep costs down to a minimum.

    This change was prompted by succession planning at Black Creek. We had been monitoring Black Creek for some time due to the departure of a senior team member for health reasons and the uncertainty surrounding the timing of founder Bill Kanko’s retirement. With a similar investment style to Black Creek, EdgePoint seeks to buy good, undervalued businesses and hold them until the market fully realises their potential.

    Through the combination, we inherited a small number of investment trust and private equity fund holdings, representing less than 3% of the combined portfolio. These are specialist funds with portfolios focused on, among other things, early-stage life sciences, valuable intellectual property, innovative internet platforms and renewable infrastructure assets. Collective investments such as these are not normally part of our investment strategy. However, they are all trading at prices we believe are well below their intrinsic value, so rather than sell them at a loss, we will hold them until we can achieve attractive values.

    Beyond that, the combination did not lead to any change in our investment approach. We retain high conviction in our line-up of Managers and their ability to pick winning stocks, although we keep them under constant review for any red flags and have access to a deep bench of talented replacements should these be needed.

    Gearing: remaining cautious

    Our gross gearing stood at 8.4% at the end of 2024 (4.9% net of underlying Manager and central cash), slightly above the level of 7.1% at the start of the year, reflecting the improving outlook for equities as the year progressed. However, given the strong performance from equity markets, it is still towards the lower end of the typical range of 7.5 to 12.5%.

    Market outlook: multiple risks warrant diversification

    As 2025 began, the mood among investors was upbeat, with many hoping President Trump’s promises of deregulation and tax cuts would be supportive of equity markets. If returns can spread beyond a narrow group of highly valued US mega-cap technology stocks, it could provide firmer foundations for another good year for shares. The strong start to the year for European equities certainly offered hope for geographical diversification.

    However, on-off tariffs and geopolitical tensions loom large, creating considerable uncertainty. This was reflected in an increase in equity market volatility in February.

    In the first 2 months of 2025, the benchmark index rose by 2.2% suggesting that investors were still willing to look through some of the risks while forecast global growth and corporate earnings remain healthy. But confidence is fragile and, with valuations in the US still close to a record high despite February’s pullback, the market is vulnerable to setbacks.

    In this environment, we believe bottom-up stock picking, based on company fundamentals, should be a more reliable way to add value for shareholders in the long term than making bold, top-down market calls. So, we will continue to position the portfolio to maintain balanced regional, sector and style exposures, that are similar to the Index weightings by periodically adjusting Manager allocations. This should provide stability and reduce risk, while we rely on our Managers to add value by seeking out the best companies in each market segment.

    While retaining some exposure to US mega-cap tech stocks that may continue delivering attractive returns, our portfolio is not reliant on them. It also contains many stocks that have remained in the shadows but have been performing well operationally and have excellent prospects not yet reflected in their share prices.

    Hidden gems: stock picks with high potential

    We asked our eleven Stock Pickers for examples of strong but underappreciated companies in the portfolio

    Lyrical highlighted five of its US holdings that have underperformed the S&P 500 Index since the start of 2024 but, at the same time, have grown their forecast earnings per share by more than the Index. These are healthcare providers Cigna and HCA, WEX and Global Payments, which both provide business-to-business payment technology, and Gen Digital, which is a leading provider of cyber security and identity protection.

    “Interestingly, even on this list there is inconsistency by the market,” says Lyrical. “Cigna has the worst stock performance, but the second-best earnings per share (‘EPS’) growth. Gen Digital has the slowest EPS growth in the group, but the best performance”.

    ARGA cited Accor, the global hotel business, which has transitioned to an “asset light” business model by selling most of its hotels, while maintaining the lucrative franchise and management agreements attached to these properties. While Sands Capital sees potential in the share prices of Sika, a maintenance and building refurbishment specialist.

    “Investment results have been weak despite solid fundamental results,” says Sands. “We believe that investors have focused on slower than historical organic growth, caused by several factors, including the real estate crisis in China, slowdown in electric vehicle production, and a pause in green building incentives.”

    Sands Capital also mentioned Roper Technologies, a diversified industrial technology company, and Keyence, a leading designer of high-end factory automation based in Japan, as attractive businesses with share price appreciation potential.

    Vulcan highlighted CoStar Group, an information provider to the commercial and residential real estate industries, and Everest Group, a global insurance and reinsurance business, while GQG mentioned the UK-based pharmaceutical company AstraZeneca, the Brazil-based oil and gas company Petrobras, Bank Mandiri in Indonesia, and the Indian tobacco company ITC.

    SGA backed Danaher, the US industrial group, Intuit, which provides do-it-yourself accounting software for small businesses, and HDFC Bank in India. Jennison highlighted Reddit, the online social media platform.

    “Reddit is targeting 49% growth in the third quarter of 2024 and consensus is at 41% in Q4, but then market estimates are fading down to around 20% in 2025, which we think is overly conservative and creates an opportunity for investment today.”

    Veritas’s nominations for underappreciated businesses were Amadeus, the Spanish software company focusing on air travel, The Cooper Companies, which makes contact lenses, and Thermo Fisher Scientific, the world’s largest scientific equipment provider.

    Japan specialist Dalton’s best stocks included Bandai Namco, a multinational that publishes video games and makes toys, Shimano, the bicycle equipment manufacturer, and Rinnai, one of the global leaders in water heaters. Metropolis highlighted Andritz, the Austrian headquartered business supplying industrial equipment to the pulp and paper, metals and hydropower industries, Crown Holdings, which makes aluminium drinks cans, and Admiral, the UK insurer.

    Finally, EdgePoint, the newest addition to our Manager line-up, pointed to Dayforce, a global human resources software company, Nippon Paints Holdings in Japan, Franco-Nevada, a gold-focused royalty company in Canada, and Qualcomm, which invented significant pieces of the underlying technology required for mobile phones.

    “The market looks at Qualcomm as a handset supplier and the stock moves in relation to expected handset sales over the following quarters,” says EdgePoint. “We consider Qualcomm to be one of the world’s leading designers of energy-efficient processors at a point in time when demand for energy-efficient processing is growing rapidly across a wide range of industries. Some of the major opportunities for Qualcomm over the next 5 years include artificial intelligence, automobiles, personal computers and smartphones.”

    Altogether, these fundamentally strong businesses combine with others to create a robust, multi-manager portfolio that offers attractive long-term growth with lower risk than a single manager strategy, and therefore a more comfortable ride through the ups and downs of the market. Such companies may have remained below the radar in 2024, when investors became giddy with the stellar returns from the US technology shares, but we look forward to their attributes receiving the recognition from the market that they deserve.

    Craig Baker, Stuart Gray, Mark Davis
    Willis Towers Watson
    Investment Manager

    The securities referred to above represent the views of the underlying managers and are not stock recommendations.

    Summary of Portfolio
    As at 31 December 2024

    A full list of the Company’s Investment Portfolio can be found on the Company’s website, www.alliancewitan.com

    Top 20 holdings

    Name £m %
    Microsoft 236.3 4.3
    Amazon 197.4 3.6
    Visa 156.2 2.8
    UnitedHealth Group 116.4 2.1
    Alphabet 107.7 1.9
    Diageo 92.4 1.7
    Meta 88.6 1.6
    NVIDIA 82.7 1.5
    Aon 75.1 1.4
    Novo Nordisk 73.1 1.3
    Netflix 70.9 1.3
    Mastercard 70.7 1.3
    Eli Lilly 69.9 1.3
    Salesforce 61.5 1.1
    HDFC Bank 58.2 1.1
    Safran 53.3 1.0
    Taiwan Semiconductor 49.9 0.9
    Petrobras 48.1 0.9
    State Street 48.0 0.9
    Philip Morris 47.6 0.9

    The 20 largest stock positions, given as a percentage of the total assets. Each Stock Picker selects up to 20 stocks.*
    Top 20 holdings 32.9%
    Top 10 holdings 22.2%

    * Apart from GQG Partners, which also manages a dedicated emerging markets mandate with up to 60 stocks.

    Dividend

    We have paid our shareholders a rising dividend for 58 consecutive years. Providing that level of reliability is something of which we are extremely proud. We carefully manage the Company’s dividend. For instance, should there be a year in which income is unexpectedly high, we may retain some of that income to help fund future dividends. Due to our steady approach, the Company has received a ‘Dividend Hero’ investment company award from the Association of Investment Companies (‘AIC’).

    Our dividend policy

    Subject to market conditions and the Company’s performance, financial position and outlook, the Board will seek to pay a dividend that increases year on year. The Company expects to pay four interim dividends per year, on or around the last day of June, September, December and March, and will not, generally, pay a final dividend for a particular financial year.

    While shareholders are not asked to approve a final dividend, given the timing of the payment of the quarterly payments, each year they are given the opportunity to share their views when they are asked to approve the Company’s Dividend Policy.

    Fourth interim dividend

    As previously announced, a fourth interim dividend of 6.73p per ordinary share will be paid on 31 March 2025 to those shareholders who were on the register at close of business on 28 February 2025.

    Increased dividend

    The Company has increased its total dividend for the year ended 31 December 2024 to 26.7p per ordinary share (2023: 25.2p), a 6.0% increase on the previous year.

    Dividend 2024 (p) 2023 (p) % increase
    1st Interim 6.62 6.18 7.1
    2nd Interim 6.62 6.34 4.4
    3rd Interim 6.73 6.34 6.2
    4th Interim 6.73 6.34 6.2

    Reserves

    It is the Board’s intention to utilise distributable reserves as well as portfolio income to fund dividend payments. Further details of the dividend payments for the year to 31 December 2024 and information on distributable reserves can be found in notes 7 and 2(b)(x) of the Financial Statements, respectively.

    Ongoing Charges and Discount

    Ongoing charges1

    The Company’s ongoing charges ratio (‘OCR’) decreased to 0.56% (including the impact of the investment management fee waiver) (2023: 0.62%). Total administrative expenses were £3.9m (2023: £2.9m) and investment management expenses were £18.4m (2023: £16.3m). Further details of the Company’s expenses are provided in note 4 of the Financial Statements on page 90 of the Annual Report. The Company’s costs remain competitive for an actively managed multi-manager global equity strategy.

    Maintaining a stable discount1

    One of the Company’s strategic objectives is to maintain a stable share price discount to NAV. The Company has the authority to buy back its own shares in the market if the discount is widening and to hold these shares in Treasury.

    During the year under review, the Company’s share price traded at an average discount of 4.7% (2023: 6.0%). As at 31 December 2024, the Company’s share price discount was 4.7% (2023: 5.4%). The average discount (unweighted) for the AIC Global Sector was 7.9%.

    Share issuance and buybacks

    As a result of the combination with Witan, 120,949,382 new ordinary shares were issued for assets valued at £1.5bn implying an effective issue price of £12.7459246 per share.

    The Company bought back 1.2%* (2023: 3.0%) of its issued share capital during the year, purchasing 4,722,000 shares which were placed in Treasury. The total cost of the share buybacks was £57.0m (2023: £86.6m). The weighted average discount of shares bought back in the year was 5.7%. Share buybacks contributed a total of 0.1% to the Company’s NAV performance in the year.

    1. Alternative Performance Measure – see page 116 of the Annual Report for details.
    * Percentage based on the Company’s issued share capital (excluding shares held in Treasury) as at 31 December 2024.

    What We Do

    How WTW manages the portfolio

    WTW as Investment Manager has overall responsibility for managing the Company’s portfolio. It is the Investment Manager’s job to select a diverse team of expert Stock Pickers, each of whom invest in a customised selection of 10-20 of their ‘best ideas’. WTW then allocates capital to them, relative to the risks the Stock Picker represents. For example, small-cap stocks are typically more risky than large-cap stocks, so on average a small-cap specialist would tend to receive less capital than a Stock Picker who focuses on large-cap stocks. However, the allocations do not remain static; WTW keeps them under constant review and varies them over time according to market conditions, with the goal of keeping our exposures to different parts of global stocks markets well balanced.

    Stock Pickers are encouraged to ignore the benchmark and only buy a small number of stocks in which they have strong conviction, while WTW manages risk through the Stock Picker allocations. On their own, each of the Stock Picker’s high-conviction mandates has the potential to perform well. This is supported by WTW’s experience of managing high-conviction portfolios and academic evidence1. But concentrated selections of stocks can be volatile and risky, so WTW mitigates these dangers by blending Stock Pickers with complementary investment approaches or styles, which can be expected to perform differently in different market conditions. This smooths out the peaks and troughs of performance associated with concentrated single-manager strategies.

    Several of the Stock Pickers in the current portfolio have been with the Investment Manager since inception of the multi-manager strategy, though it does actively monitor and rearrange the line-up where necessary.

    WTW invests a lot of time and effort on identifying skilled Stock Pickers for the Company’s portfolio, undertaking extensive qualitative and quantitative analysis. This due diligence process focuses on:

    • The investment processes, resources and decision-making that make up the Stock Picker’s competitive advantage;
    • The culture and alignment of the organisation that leads to sustainability of that competitive advantage;
    • Their approach to responsible investment. WTW aims to appoint Stock Pickers who actively engage with the companies in which they invest and have an effective voting policy. When necessary, they challenge the Stock Pickers and guide them towards better practices; and
    • The operational infrastructure that minimises risk from a compliance, regulatory and operational perspective.

    1. Sebastian & Attaluri, Conviction in Equity Investing, The Journal of Portfolio Management, Summer 2014.

    The Investment Manager’s views are formed over extended periods from multiple interactions with the Managers, including regular meetings. They look beyond past performance numbers to try to understand the ‘competitive edge’. This involves examining and interrogating processes for selecting stocks, adherence to this process through different market conditions, team dynamics, training and experience. Performance track records are just a single data point, and, without the context of the additional information, they are unlikely to persuade WTW that a Stock Picker is skilled.

    Once selected, the Investment Manager tends to form long-term partnerships with the Stock Pickers, generally only taking them out of the portfolio if something fundamental changes, such as the departure of a key individual from the business or a change in business strategy or fortunes. With highly active, concentrated portfolios, periods of short-term underperformance are to be expected and are not a reason to doubt a Stock Picker if they are adhering to their philosophy and process. WTW does, however, keep a constant eye out for talent and may bring new Managers into the portfolio at the expense of an incumbent if they are a better fit.

    Responsible investment

    WTW believes that Environmental, Social and Governance (‘ESG’) factors have the potential to impact financial risk and return. As long-term investors, WTW aims to incorporate these factors into its investment process.

    As stewards of the Company’s assets, WTW seeks to integrate responsible investment into its process for managing the portfolio. ESG factors can influence returns, so these risk factors are taken into account in WTW’s investment processes, including assessing how Managers evaluate ESG risk in their decisions over what stocks to purchase. Climate change poses potential significant risks to investment returns from many companies, which is why both WTW and the Company have stated an intention to manage the assets with a goal of achieving Net Zero greenhouse gas emissions from the portfolio by 2050, with an interim intention of reducing portfolio emissions by approximately 50% by 2030, relative to 2019.

    In 2024, we saw an increase in the portfolio’s weighted average carbon intensity (which measures carbon emissions as a proportion of revenue) from 71.9tCO2e/$M sales to 117. 9tCO2e/$M sales. Over the year, some higher-emitting stocks came into the portfolio including, industrial company Alaska Air and materials company Alcoa Ord, and our allocation to the higher-emitting Utilities sector went up slightly with purchases of companies such as Southern Ord and American Electric Power. We are monitoring our progress against our Net Zero goal, and our Managers and EOS at Federated Hermes (‘EOS’) continue to engage with the companies in the portfolio on climate related issues.

    Progress towards Net Zero will not be linear. Emissions from the portfolio are dependent on holdings, which can change from year to year as WTW’s Stock Pickers seek value for investors. If companies are perceived as being at higher financial risk by being slow to adapt to a Net Zero world, we expect to use stewardship, such as voting and engagement, to encourage positive changes to business practices. WTW believes this is preferable to excluding companies from the portfolio, since exclusion merely passes the responsibility of ownership to other investors who may be less scrupulous about adherence to ESG standards or regulation.

    As well as engaging with companies on climate change, WTW’s Stock Pickers, together with stewardship provider EOS, focused on a wide range of other issues last year.

    Overall, EOS engaged with 97 companies in the portfolio on 515 issues and objectives throughout the year. Key areas of engagement included board effectiveness, climate change, human and labour rights and human capital, biodiversity, digital rights and AI. Of these engagements, the environmental category accounted for 29% of the total number of engagements, with 63% of environmental engagements relating to climate change. Meanwhile the Stock Pickers cast votes at 3,346 resolutions in 2024. Of these resolutions, they voted against company management on 386 and abstained from voting on 38 occasions.

    How We Manage Our Risks

    In order to monitor and manage risks facing the Company, the Board maintains and regularly reviews a risk register and heat map. The risk register details all principal and emerging risks thought to face the Company at any given time. The principal risks facing the Company, as determined by the Board, are Investment, Operational and Legal and Regulatory Non-Compliance.

    As part of its review process, the Board considers input on the principal and emerging risks facing the Company from its key service providers WTW and Juniper. Any risks and their associated risk ratings are then discussed, and the risk register and heat map updated accordingly, with additional measures put in place to monitor, manage and mitigate risks as required. During the period the Board carefully reviewed the risks associated with the implementation of the combination and the post transaction integration risks.

    Principal risks

    The principal risks facing the Company, how they have changed during the year and how the Board aims to monitor and manage these risks are detailed below.

    Risk and potential impact Risk rating How we monitor and manage the risk
    Market risk: loss on the portfolio in absolute terms, caused by economic and political events, interest rate movements and fluctuation in foreign exchange rates. Increased due to geopolitical and macro-economic uncertainty
    • The Board sets investment guidelines and the Investment Manager selects Stock Pickers and styles to provide diversification within the portfolio.
    • The Board receives regular updates from the Investment Manager and monitors adverse movements and impacts on the portfolio.
    • An explanation of the different components of market risk and how they are individually managed is contained in note 18 to the Financial Statements.
    Investment performance: relative underperformance makes the Company an unattractive investment proposition. Stable
    • The Company’s investment performance against its investment objective, relevant benchmark and closed and open ended peer group are reviewed and challenged where appropriate by the Board at every Board meeting.
    • The Board receives regular reporting from the Investment Manager to allow it to review the approach to ESG and climate risk factors embedded within the investment process from the Company’s perspective.
    Strategy and market rating: demand for the Company’s shares decreases due to changes in demand for the Company’s strategy or secular changes in investor demand. Stable
    • The Board regularly reviews the share register and receives feedback from the Investment Manager and broker on all marketing and investor relations and shareholder meetings, to keep informed of investor sentiment and how the Company is perceived in the market.
    • The Board monitors the Company’s share price discount and, working with the broker undertakes periodic share buybacks as appropriate to meet its strategic objective of maintaining a stable discount.
    • The proposed combination with Witan and the benefits to ongoing investors in terms of scale and investor proposition were reviewed and thoroughly considered to ensure the enlarged Company would be an attractive proposition for both current and prospective shareholders.
    Capital structure and financial risk: inappropriate capital or gearing structure may result in losses for the Company. Stable
    • The Board receives regular updates on the capital structure of the Company including share capital, borrowings, structure of reserves, compliance with ongoing covenants and shareholder authorities, to allow ongoing monitoring of the appropriate structure.
    • The Board reviews and manages the borrowing limits under which the Investment Manager operates. As part of the Witan combination, additional borrowing was novated to the Company. These additional facilities provide an increased blend of interest rates and maturity dates.
    • Shareholder authority is sought annually in relation to share issuance and buybacks to facilitate ongoing management of the share capital.
    Operational
    All of the Company’s operations are outsourced to third party service providers. Any failure in the operational controls of the Company’s service providers could result in financial, legal or regulatory and reputational damage for the Company.
    Operational risks include cyber security, IT systems failure, inadequacy of oversight and control, climate risk and ineffective disaster recovery planning.
    Stable
    • The Board monitors the services provided by the key services suppliers and formally reviews the performance of each on an annual basis, including the review of audited internal control reports where appropriate. No material issues were raised as part of the evaluation process in 2024.
    • Cyber security continues to be a key focus for the Board. Reports on the cyber security, IT testing environment and disaster recovery testing of each key service provider are reviewed by the Board annually.
    • Any breaches in controls which have resulted in errors or incidents are required to be immediately notified to the Board along with proposed remediation actions.
    Legal and regulatory
    Failure to adhere to all legal and regulatory requirements could lead to financial and legal penalties, reputational damage and potential loss of investment trust status. Stable
    • The Board has contracted with its key service suppliers, including the Investment Manager and Juniper, in relation to its ongoing legal and regulatory compliance. The Board receives quarterly reports from each supplier to monitor ongoing compliance. The Company has complied with all legal and regulatory requirements in 2024.
    • Any breaches in controls which have resulted in errors or incidents are required to be immediately notified to the Board, along with proposed remediation actions.
    • The review of the Annual Report by the independent auditors provides additional assurance that the Company has met all legal and regulatory requirements in respect of those disclosures.

    Emerging risks

    Emerging risks are typified by having a high degree of uncertainty and may result from sudden events, new potential trends or changing specific risks where the impact and probable effect is hard to assess. As the assessment becomes clearer, the risk may be added to the risk matrix of ‘known’ risks.

    The Board is currently monitoring a number of emerging risks: geopolitical tension continues to be an emerging risk for the Company due to ongoing conflicts across the world. Along with increased populism and nationalism, these risks may impact individual economies and global markets. Although covered in the operational risk section above, the Board recognises the increased risk that cybercrime and the misuse of AI poses to the Company.

    Geopolitical events such as the conflicts in the Middle East region, coupled with the potential breakdown of post war alliances and potential new trade tariffs and changes to US economic and international policies introduced by President Trump, could bring uncertainty and fragility to capital markets in 2025, including persistent or reacceleration of inflationary pressures.

    Stakeholder Engagement – Section 172 Statement

    The Directors have a number of obligations including those under section 172 of the Companies Act 2006. These obligations relate to how the Board takes account of various factors in making its decisions – including the impact of its decisions on key stakeholders. The Board is focused on the Company’s performance and its responsibilities to stakeholders, corporate culture and diversity, as well as its contributions to wider society, and it takes account of stakeholder interests when making decisions on behalf of the Company.

    As an externally-managed investment trust, the Board considers the Company’s key stakeholders to be existing and potential new shareholders and its service providers.

    Full details on the primary ways in which the Board engaged with the Company’s key stakeholders can be found on pages 30 to 35 of the Annual Report.

    Dean Buckley
    Chair
    6 March 2025

    Viability and Going Concern Statements

    Viability Statement

    The Board has assessed the prospects and viability of the Company beyond the 12 months required by the Going Concern accounting provisions.

    The Board considered the current position of the Company and its prospects, strategy and planning process as well as its principal and emerging risks in the current, medium and long term, as set out on pages 27 to 29 of the Annual Report. After the year-end but prior to approval of these Accounts, the Board reviewed its performance against its strategic objectives and its management of the principal and emerging risks facing the Company.

    The Board received regular updates on performance and other factors that could impact on the viability of the Company.

    The Board has concluded that there is a reasonable expectation that the Company will be able to continue in operation and meet its liabilities as they fall due for at least the next five years; the Board expects this position to continue over many more years to come. The Company’s Investment Objective, which was approved by shareholders in April 2019, is to deliver a real return over the long term, through a combination of capital growth and a rising dividend, and the Board regards the Company’s shares as a long-term investment. The Board believes that a period of five years is considered a reasonable period for investment in equities and is appropriate for the composition of the Company’s portfolio.

    In arriving at this conclusion, the Board considered:

    • Financial strength: As at 31 December 2024 the Company had total assets of £5.6bn, with net gearing of 4.9% and gross gearing of 8.4%. At the year-end the Company had £182.7m of cash or cash equivalents.
    • Investment: The portfolio is invested in listed equities across the globe. The portfolio is structured for long-term performance; the Board considers five years as being an appropriate period over which to measure performance.
    • Liquidity: The Company is closed-ended, which means that there is no requirement to realise investments to allow shareholders to sell their shares. The Directors consider this structure supports the long-term viability and sustainability of the Company, and have assumed that shareholders will continue to be attracted to the closed-ended structure due to its liquidity benefit. During the year, WTW carried out a liquidity analysis and stress test which indicated that around 93% of the Company’s portfolio could be sold within a single day and a further 6% within 10 days, without materially influencing market pricing. WTW performs liquidity analysis and stress testing on the Company’s portfolio of investments on an ongoing basis under both current and stressed conditions. WTW remains comfortable with the liquidity of the portfolio under both of these market conditions. The Board would not expect this position to materially alter in the future.
    • Dividends: The Company has significant accumulated distributable reserves which together with investment income can be used to support payment of the Company’s dividend. The Board regularly reviews revenue forecasts and considers the long-term sustainability of dividends under a variety of different scenarios. The Company has sufficient funds to meet its Dividend Policy commitments.
    • Reserves: The Company has large reserves (at 31 December 2024 it had £3.7bn of distributable reserves and £1.5bn of other reserves).
    • Discount: The Company has no fixed discount control policy. The Company will continue to buy back shares when the Board considers it appropriate, to take advantage of any significant widening of the discount and to produce NAV accretion for shareholders.
    • Significant Risks: The Company has a risk and control framework which includes a number of triggers which, if breached, would alert the Board to any potential adverse scenarios. The Board has developed and reviewed various scenarios based on potentially adverse events as set out in note 18 on pages 100 to 107 of the Annual Report.
    • Borrowing: In consideration of the combination with Witan, the Company’s borrowing facilities were reviewed to ensure they remained appropriate. The Company’s available bank borrowing facilities were consequently increased by £50m; and £155m of fixed rate loan notes were novated from Witan as part of the combination. The Company’s weighted average borrowings costs have reduced by 0.3%. All borrowings are secured by floating charges over the assets of the Company. The Company comfortably meets its banking covenants.
    • Security: The Company retains title to all assets held by the Custodian which are subject to further safeguards imposed on the Depositary.
    • Operations: Throughout the year under review, the Company’s key service providers continued to operate in line with service level agreements with no significant errors or breaches having been recorded.

    Going Concern Statement

    In view of the conclusions drawn in the foregoing Viability Statements, which considered the resources of the Company over the next 12 months and beyond, the Directors believe that the Company has adequate financial resources to continue in existence for at least the period to 31 March 2026. Therefore, the Directors believe that it is appropriate to continue to adopt the Going Concern basis in preparing the financial statements.

    Directors’ Responsibilities

    The Directors are responsible for preparing the Annual Report and the Financial Statements in accordance with UK-adopted international accounting standards and applicable law and regulations.

    Company law requires the Directors to prepare Financial Statements for each financial year. Under that law the Directors are required to prepare the Financial Statements in accordance with UK-adopted international accounting standards. Under company law the Directors must not approve the Financial Statements unless they are satisfied that they give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the Company and of the profit or loss for that period.

    In preparing these Financial Statements, the Directors are required to:

    • Select suitable accounting policies and then apply them consistently;
    • Make judgements and accounting estimates that are reasonable and prudent;
    • State whether they have been prepared in accordance with UK-adopted International Accounting Standards, subject to any material departures disclosed and explained in the Financial Statements;
    • Prepare the Financial Statements on the Going Concern basis unless it is inappropriate to presume that the Company will continue in business; and
    • Prepare a Directors’ Report, a Strategic Report and Directors’ Remuneration Report which comply with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006.

    The Directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting records that are sufficient to show and explain the Company’s transactions, and disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of the Company and enable them to ensure that the Financial Statements comply with the Companies Act 2006.

    They are also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the Company and hence for taking reasonable steps for the prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities. The Directors are responsible for ensuring that the Annual Report and Financial Statements, taken as a whole, are fair, balanced and understandable and provides the information necessary for shareholders to assess the Company’s position, performance, business model and strategy.

    Website publication

    The Directors are responsible for ensuring the Annual Report and the Financial Statements are made available on a website. Financial Statements are published on the Company’s website in accordance with legislation in the United Kingdom governing the preparation and dissemination of Financial Statements, which may vary from legislation in other jurisdictions. The maintenance and integrity of the Company’s website is the responsibility of the Directors. The Directors’ responsibility also extends to the ongoing integrity of the Financial Statements contained therein.

    Report of Directors and Responsibility Statement

    The Report of the Directors on pages 36 to 69 of the Annual Report (other than pages 61 to 63 which form part of the Strategic Report) of the Annual Report and Accounts has been approved by the Board. The Directors have chosen to include information relating to future development of the Company and relationships with suppliers, customers and others, and their impact on the Board’s decisions on pages 30 to 35 of the Annual Report.

    Each of the Directors, who are listed on pages 37 to 40 of the Annual Report, confirm to the best of their knowledge that:

    • The Financial Statements, prepared in accordance with the applicable set of UK adopted International Accounting Standards, give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit or loss of the Company;
    • The Annual Report includes a fair view of the development and performance of the business and the position of the Company, together with a description of the principal risks and uncertainties that the Company faces; and
    • In the opinion of the Board, the Annual Report and Financial Statements taken as a whole, are fair, balanced and understandable and provides the information necessary to assess the Company’s position, performance, business model and strategy.

    On behalf of the Board

    Dean Buckley
    Chair
    6 March 2025
    Statement of Comprehensive Income for the year ended 31 December 2024
      Year to 31 December 2024 Year to 31 December 2023
      Revenue Capital Total Revenue Capital Total
    £000            
    Income         72,463 354 72,817 69,591 1,678 71,269
    Gains on investments held at fair value through profit or loss 449,551 449,551 578,715 578,715
    Losses on derivatives (206) (206)
    Gains/(losses) on fair value of debt 16,708 16,708 (11,371) (11,371)
    Total 72,463 466,407 538,870 69,591 569,022 638,613
    Investment management fees (5,381) (13,058) (18,439) (5,074) (11,228) (16,302)
    Administrative expenses (3,661) (281) (3,942) (2,558) (344) (2,902)
    Finance costs (3,221) (9,662) (12,883) (2,380) (7,141) (9,521)
    Foreign exchange losses (1,010) (1,010) (3,737) (3,737)
    Profit before tax 60,200 442,396 502,596 59,579 546,572 606,151
    Taxation (6,545) (5,348) (11,893) (6,231) (251) (6,482)
    Profit for the year 53,655 437,048 490,703 53,348 546,321 599,669

    All profit for the year is attributable to equity holders.

           
             
    Earnings per share (pence per share) 17.30 140.95 158.25 18.55 189.98 208.53

    All revenue and capital items in the above statement derive from continuing operations.

    The ‘Total’ column of this statement is the profit and loss account of the Company and the ‘Revenue’ and ‘Capital’ columns represent supplementary information prepared under guidance issued by the Association of Investment Companies. The Company does not have any other comprehensive income and hence profit for the year, as disclosed above, is the same as the Company’s total comprehensive income.

    Statement of Changes in Equity for the year ended 31 December 2024
            Distributable reserves  
    £000 Share
    capital
    Share premium account Capital redemption reserve Realised capital reserve Unrealised capital reserve Revenue reserve Total distributable reserves Total equity
                     
    At 1 January 2023 7,314 11,684 2,669,933 103,754 102,334 2,876,021 2,895,019
    Total comprehensive income:                
    Profit for the year 75,430 470,891 53,348 599,669 599,669
    Transactions with owners, recorded directly to equity:                
    Ordinary dividends paid (71,378) (71,378) (71,378)
    Unclaimed dividends returned 14 14 14
    Own shares purchased (208) 208 (86,636) (86,636) (86,636)
    Balance at 31 December 2023 7,106 11,892 2,658,727 574,645 84,318 3,317,690 3,336,688

    Total comprehensive income:

                   
    Profit for the year 458,122 (21,074) 53,655 490,703 490,703
    Transactions with owners, recorded directly to equity:                
    Issue of ordinary shares in respect of the combination with Witan 3,024 1,535,877 1,538,901
    Costs in relation to the combination (4,947) (4,947)
    Ordinary dividends paid (82,414) (82,414) (82,414)
    Unclaimed dividends returned 9 9 9
    Own shares purchased (56,987) (56,987) (56,987)
    Balance at 31 December 2024 10,130 1,530,930 11,892 3,059,862 553,571 55,568 3,669,001 5,221,953

    The £553.6m (2023: £574.6m) of unrealised capital reserve arising on the revaluation of investments is subject to fair value movements and may not be readily realisable at short notice, as such it may not be entirely distributable. The unrealised capital reserve includes unrealised gains on borrowings of £22.8m (2023: £5.5m) and gains on unquoted investments of £3.5m (2023: £nil) which are not distributable.

    Balance Sheet as at 31 December 2024
      2024 2023
    £000    
    Non-current assets            
    Investments held at fair value through profit or loss 5,402,381 3,482,329
      5,402,381 3,482,329
    Current assets    
    Outstanding settlements and other receivables 11,282 9,321
    Cash and cash equivalents 182,725 84,974
      194,007 94,295
    Total assets 5,596,388 3,576,624
    Current liabilities    
    Outstanding settlements and other payables (13,057) (9,792)
    Bank loans (45,245)
      (58,302) (9,792)
         
    Total assets less current liabilities 5,538,086 3,566,832
         
    Non-current liabilities    
    Fixed rate loan notes held at fair value (299,276) (215,144)
    Bank loans (15,000) (15,000)
    Deferred tax provision (1,857)
      (316,133) (230,144)
    Net assets 5,221,953 3,336,688
         
    Equity    
    Share capital 10,130 7,106
    Share premium account 1,530,930
    Capital redemption reserve 11,892 11,892
    Capital reserve 3,613,433 3,233,372
    Revenue reserve 55,568 84,318
    Total equity 5,221,953 3,336,688
    All net assets are attributable to equity holders.
     
    Net asset value per ordinary share attributable to equity holders (£) £13.05 £11.75

    The Financial Statements were approved by the Board of Directors and authorised for issue on 6 March 2025.

    They were signed on its behalf by:

    Jo Dixon
    Chair of the Audit and Risk Committee

    Cash Flow Statement for the year ended 31 December 2024
      2024 2023
    £000    
    Cash flows from operating activities    
    Profit before tax 502,596 606,151
         
    Adjustments for:    
    Gains on investments (449,551) (578,715)
    Losses on derivatives 206
    (Gains)/losses on fair value of debt (16,708) 11,371
    Foreign exchange losses 1,010 3,737
    Finance costs 12,883 9,521
    Operating cash flows before movements in working capital 50,436 52,065
    (Increase)/decrease in receivables (2,274) 1,599
    Decrease in payables (43) (36)
    Net cash inflow from operating activities before tax 48,119 53,628
    Taxes paid (10,701) (6,654)
    Net cash inflow from operating activities 37,418 46,974
         
    Cash flows from investing activities    
    Proceeds on disposal of investments 4,697,547 1,600,165
    Purchases of investments (4,702,449) (1,489,643)
    Settlement of derivative financial instruments (206)
    Net cash (outflow)/inflow from investing activities (5,108) 110,522
    Net cash inflow before financing 32,310 157,496
         
    Cash flows from financing activities    
    Dividends paid – equity (82,414) (71,378)
    Unclaimed dividends returned 9 14
    Net cash acquired following the combination with Witan 177,581
    Costs paid in relation to the combination with Witan (4,947)
    Purchase of own shares (56,987) (88,060)
    Repayment of bank debt (59,000) (63,500)
    Drawdown of bank debt 104,874 15,000
    Issue of loan notes 60,632
    Finance costs paid (12,033) (10,357)
    Net cash inflow/(outflow) from financing activities 67,083 (157,649)
         
    Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 99,393 (153)
    Cash and cash equivalents at the start of the year 84,974 88,864
    Effect of foreign exchange rate changes (1,642) (3,737)
    Cash and cash equivalents at end of the year 182,725 84,974

    The financial information set out above does not constitute the Company’s statutory Financial Statements for the years ended 31 December 2024 or 2023, but is derived from those Financial Statements. Statutory accounts for 2023 have been delivered to the Registrar of Companies and those for 2024 will be delivered following the Company’s Annual General Meeting. The auditors have reported on those accounts; their reports were unqualified, did not draw attention to any matters by way of emphasis without qualifying their report and did not contain statements under s498(2) or (3) Companies Act 2006.

    The same accounting policies, presentations and methods of computation are followed in these Financial Statements as were applied in the Company’s last annual audited Financial Statements, other than those stated in the Annual Report.

    Basis of accounting

    The Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with UK-adopted international accounting standards (‘IASs’).

    The Financial Statements have been prepared on the historical cost basis, except that investments and fixed rate notes are stated at fair value through the profit and loss. The Association of Investment Companies (‘AIC’) issued a Statement of Recommended Practice: Financial Statements of Investment Companies (‘AIC SORP’) in July 2022. The Directors have sought to prepare the Financial Statements in accordance with the AIC SORP where the recommendations are consistent with International Financial Reporting Standards (‘IFRS’). The Company qualifies as an investment entity.

    1. Income    
    An analysis of the Company’s revenue is as follows:    
         
    £000 2024 2023
    Revenue:    
    Income from investments    
    Listed dividends – UK 10,125 12,836
    Listed dividends – Overseas 60,838 55,761
      70,963 68,597
    Other income    
    Bank interest 1,475 987
    Other income 25 7
      1,500 994
    Total allocated to revenue 72,463 69,591
         
    Capital:    
    Income from investments    
    Listed dividends – UK 23
    Listed dividends – Overseas 331 1,678
    Total allocated to capital 354 1,678
    Total income 72,817 71,269
    2. Dividends    
    Dividends paid during the year    
         
    £000 2024 2023
    2022 fourth interim dividend 6.00p per share 17,498
    2023 first interim dividend 6.18p per share 17,849
    2023 second interim dividend 6.34p per share 18,028
    2023 third interim dividend 6.34p per share 18,003
    2023 fourth interim dividend 6.34p per share 18,003
    2024 first interim dividend 6.62p per share 18,799
    2024 second interim dividend 6.62p per share 18,676
    2024 third interim dividend 6.73p per share 26,936
      82,414 71,378
         
    Dividends payable for the year

    We also set out below the total dividend payable in respect of the financial year, which is the basis on which the requirements of Section 1158/1159 of the Corporation Tax Act 2010 are considered.

    £000 2024 2023
    2023 first interim dividend 6.18p per share 17,849
    2023 second interim dividend 6.34p per share 18,028
    2023 third interim dividend 6.34p per share 18,003
    2023 fourth interim dividend 6.34p per share 18,003
    2024 first interim dividend 6.62p per share 18,799
    2024 second interim dividend 6.62p per share 18,676
    2024 third interim dividend 6.73p per share 26,936
    2024 fourth interim dividend 6.73p per share, payable 31 March 2025 26,933
      91,344 71,883
    3. Earnings per share
    The calculation of earnings per share is based on the following data:
     
      2024 2023
    £000 Revenue Capital Total Revenue Capital Total
    Ordinary shares            
    Earnings for the purpose of earnings per share being net profit attributable to equity holders 53,655 437,048 490,703 53,348 546,321 599,669
                 
    Number of shares            
    Weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue during the year   310,079,630   287,573,436

    The Company has no securities in issue that could dilute the return per ordinary share. Therefore the basic and diluted earnings per ordinary share are the same.

    4. Related party transactions

    There are amounts of £1,222 (2023: £1,222) and £34,225 (2023: £34,225) owed to AT2006 and The Second Alliance Trust Limited, respectively, at year-end.

    There are no other related parties other than those noted below.

    Transactions with key management personnel

    Details of the Non-Executive Directors are disclosed on pages 37 to 40 of the Annual Report.

    For the purpose of IAS 24 ‘Related Party Disclosures’, key management personnel comprised the Non-Executive Directors of the Company.

    Details of remuneration are disclosed in the Remuneration Report on pages 55 to 60 of the Annual Report.

    £000 2024 2023
    Total emoluments 337 350
         

    ANNUAL REPORT

    The Annual Report will be available in due course on the Company’s website www.alliancewitan.com. It will also be made available to the public at the Company’s registered office, River Court, 5 West Victoria Dock Road, Dundee DD1 3JT and at the offices of the Company’s Registrar, Computershare Investor Services PLC, Edinburgh House, 4 North St Andrew Street, Edinburgh EH2 1HJ after publication.

    In addition to the full Annual Report, up-to-date performance data, details of new initiatives and other information about the Company can be found on the Company’s website.

    ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING

    This year’s AGM will be held on 1 May 2025 at 11.00 a.m. at the Apex City Quay Hotel & Spa, 1 West Victoria Dock Road, Dundee DD1 3JP.

    The Board remains committed to maintaining a physical AGM, with shareholders and Directors present in person. However, the AGM will also be streamed live to shareholders. A web link will be provided for those shareholders wishing to join the AGM via the live stream. Information on how to obtain the link will be published on the Company’s website in due course.

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Three vaccinations that are critical to women’s health

    Source: Médecins Sans Frontières –

    Hepatitis E, tetanus and hepatitis B all pose significant but under-reported threats to the health and lives of women and girls, especially in low-income countries with limited access to healthcare. This can also mean life or death for their babies.

    Nyakuola Nguot Gang lives with her extended family in Fangak county, South Sudan, where a deadly hepatitis E outbreak started in 2023 and continued through 2024.  

    “I almost lost my life while I was pregnant, in September,” says Nyakuola. “I thought it was only symptoms of my pregnancy, because my body was aching and I had a fever. I went for a blood test, and that’s when hepatitis E was discovered.”

    Some diseases have far greater negative consequences in women and girls, especially during pregnancy and childbirth. Hepatitis E, a water-borne infection that affects the liver, is one of them.  

    “A lot of people call it the Ebola for pregnant women, because you have a really high mortality rate in pregnant women, although we don’t really understand why it affects pregnant women so much,” says John Johnson, vaccination advisor for Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF). “The mortality rate is around 20 to 30 per cent in pregnancy.”  

    For pregnant women with hepatitis E, the risk of death is highest in the third trimester. 

    Pregnancy is also a critical time for vaccinating women and girls against tetanus if they haven’t been vaccinated before. A serious infection for people of any age, tetanus is deadly for newborns, but protecting the mother is lifesaving for her baby.  

    A third, lesser-known disease of concern is hepatitis B. If not prevented, it has lifelong, and life-limiting, consequences.  

    Both hepatitis B and tetanus pose significant health threats for victims and survivors of sexual violence, who are many times more likely than men to be women and girls.

    The good news is that there are vaccines available, but the reality is that they’re not reaching everyone who needs them, especially the women and girls who are most at risk.

    A groundbreaking vaccination campaign in South Sudan 

    Hepatitis E is the most common cause of acute viral hepatitis, linked to approximately 20 million infections and 70,000 deaths per year. This under-recognised disease predominantly affects people experiencing poverty or disadvantage – and is especially dangerous for pregnant women. It is transmitted through faecal contamination of food and water. Large-scale outbreaks typically occur when water and sanitation conditions are inadequate.

    There is only one vaccine available, HEV 239, developed in China. MSF first piloted its use in an epidemic in Bentiu, South Sudan, in 2022, and through subsequent research has generated strong evidence of its safety and effectiveness.

    Fangak county is one of the most remote and difficult to access areas of South Sudan. With the area inundated by recurrent floods in recent years, its people have had to learn to survive in a changing environment.  

    An MSF vaccinator administers the hepatitis E vaccine to a woman in Hai Matar, Fangak County, in the first round of the campaign. South Sudan, December 2023.
    Gale Julius Dada/MSF

    “We are surrounded by water in all aspects,” says Fangak resident Bhan Gutjiath Wal. “You go to the market, you go through water. You stay at home, there is water too.”    

    But in September 2023, these conditions led to an outbreak of hepatitis E. Within two months, MSF launched only the second vaccination campaign in the world reacting to an active hepatitis E outbreak, and the first-ever during the acute stage of an outbreak in such remote and hard-to-reach communities. This joint undertaking with the Ministry of Health eventually spanned almost a year.

    “It was a personal decision to get vaccinated,” says Nyakuola. “Those who have witnessed people who have been vaccinated and live have made the decision to also get the vaccine.”

    Sharing lifesaving protection against tetanus between mother and baby 

    “Babies, especially in what we call the neonatal period, in their first 28 days – that is when they’re most susceptible to death from certain diseases and infections,” says Isabella Mayes, midwifery activity manager in MSF’s Old Fangak project. “So providing mothers with vaccinations gives their babies a little bit of protection until they can receive their vaccine later in life.”  

    If a woman is vaccinated against tetanus before she gives birth, lifesaving antibodies will transfer through the placenta into the baby’s blood.

    The bacteria that causes tetanus is widespread in the environment. The risk to newborns occurs when the cut umbilical cord is infected, usually due to unsterile tools or conditions.

    Isabella Mayes, midwifery activity manager, performs an ultrasound on a pregnant woman in Fangak county. South Sudan, January 2025.
    Paula Casado Aguirregabiria/MSF

    Known also as lockjaw, tetanus limits a baby’s ability to feed. The rigidity spreads through the whole body, and the baby’s muscles spasm uncontrollably. A baby will need intensive nursing care and isolation in a dark and quiet room to prevent reactive spasms, hospitalised for up to a month. Untreated, some 90 per cent of affected newborns will die.

    An estimated 24,000 newborns died of tetanus in 2021, according to the most recent global data available. While this figure represents a gradual decline over time, it tells us that women and girls continue to miss out on vital vaccinations, antenatal care and safe delivery care, especially in low-income countries.  

    Access to healthcare in South Sudan is extremely limited. MSF’s hospital in Old Fangak is the only facility of its kind providing care to the 20,000 people in the immediate vicinity, as well as in villages only reachable hours away by boat. This includes maternal immunisation as part of antenatal care. 

    Timely protection for victims and survivors of sexual violence

    The value of post-exposure vaccination is highlighted in care for sexual violence. A victim/survivor can be protected against both tetanus and hepatitis B after an assault or rape, but the window of opportunity to kickstart immunity is only 72 hours.

    “We [vaccinate] every patient that had any wounds,” says Renda Kella Dhol, a clinical officer in MSF’s team in Old Fangak. “We just do it immediately to prevent the disease, because [tetanus] is really very serious.”

    Hepatitis B is often transmitted through sexual contact. It is up to 100 times more infectious than HIV.  

    A woman walks in front of the entrance of the MSF hospital in Old Fangak, Jonglei State. South Sudan, December 2023.
    Gale Julius Dada/MSF

    “We don’t know the status of the perpetrator,” says Dhol. “That’s why we provide hepatitis B [vaccine] to prevent the patient from being infected by hepatitis B.”

    Hepatitis B virus often causes a long-term infection. It is a major public health problem, with an estimated 254 million people chronically infected and 1.1 million deaths worldwide in 2022 from hepatitis B-related liver disease, including liver cancer.  

    A woman can also unknowingly pass it on during childbirth to her baby, who will also need vaccination to avoid a 90 per cent likelihood of death.

    To raise awareness about sexual violence and the medical and psychological care available, MSF conducts health promotion in schools and other places where people gather, among community leaders and with the police.  

    Dhol acknowledges people are afraid of discussing the topic of sexual violence, something our teams try to dispel.  

    “We told them in song: Don’t be afraid. We are here for you. We are going to support [you]. It will never be [revealed] to everybody,” says Dhol. “But we need the right for you to have the medication and the treatment to prevent anything that might have happened during this, because it’s not your fault, and it’s happening everywhere in the world.”

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI: BW Energy: Substantial oil discovery made on the Bourdon prospect 

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Substantial oil discovery made on the Bourdon prospect 

    BW Energy is pleased to announce a substantial oil discovery with good reservoir quality on the Bourdon prospect in the Dussafu Licence offshore Gabon.  

    Evaluation of logging data and formation pressure measurements confirm approximately 34 metres of pay in an overall hydrocarbon column of 45 metres in the Gamba formation, making it the largest hydrocarbon column discovered to date in the Dussafu licence. The well was drilled by the Norve jack-up rig to a total depth of 4,135 metres. 

    The discovery will enable the Company to book additional reserves not included in its 2024 Statement of Reserves. 

    “The Bourdon appraisal well again confirms the significant resource potential of the Dussafu licence, which holds multiple additional prospects,” said Carl K. Arnet, CEO of BW Energy. “We will now carefully review the drilling results, but initial data indicates the potential for establishing a new development cluster with a production facility following the MaBoMo blueprint. We are evaluating a second sidetrack to further appraise the discovery”. 

    Bourdon is located approximately 15 kilometres west of BW Adolo FPSO and 7.5 kilometres southeast of the MaBoMo facility.  

    For further information, please contact:  

    Brice Morlot, CFO BW Energy

    +33.7.81.11.41.16 

    ir@bwenergy.no 

    About BW Energy:  

    BW Energy is a growth E&P company with a differentiated strategy targeting proven offshore oil and gas reservoirs through low risk phased developments. The Company has access to existing production facilities to reduce time to first oil and cashflow with lower investments than traditional offshore developments. The Company’s assets are 73.5% of the producing Dussafu Marine licence offshore Gabon, 100% interest in the Golfinho and Camarupim fields, a 76.5% interest in the BM-ES-23 block, a 95% interest in the Maromba field in Brazil, a 95% interest in the Kudu field in Namibia, all operated by BW Energy. In addition, BW Energy holds approximately 6.6% of the common shares in Reconnaissance Energy Africa Ltd. and a 20% non-operating interest in the onshore Petroleum Exploration License 73 (“PEL 73”) in Namibia. Total net 2P+2C reserves and resources were 599 million barrels of oil equivalent at the start of 2025. 

    This information is considered inside information pursuant to the EU Market Abuse Regulation and is subject to the disclosure requirements pursuant to Section 5-12 the Norwegian Securities Trading Act. This stock exchange release was published by Regine Andersen, 7 March 2025. 

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI USA: Lummis: Trump Executive Order Creating Strategic Bitcoin Reserve is a Huge Victory for America’s Financial Future 

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Wyoming Cynthia Lummis

    March 7, 2025

    Washington, D.C. —U.S. Senator Cynthia Lummis (R-WY), Senate Banking Subcommittee on Digital Assets Chair, issued the following statement after President Trump issued a historic executive order creating a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve:
    “President Trump promised to lead the most pro-digital asset administration in U.S. history, and today he is fulfilling that promise,” said Lummis. “By embracing bitcoin as a strategic asset, President Trump has charted a path to addressing our national debt and securing America’s position as the world leader in financial innovation. The American people will look back on this decision as the moment we reclaimed our financial future, and I look forward to partnering with President Trump to get this across the finish line.”

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Attorney General Bonta Continues His Support for Federal Workers: Trump Administration’s Termination of Probationary Employees is Simply Unlawful

    Source: US State of California Department of Justice

    Files Lawsuit Against Federal Government to Stop Mass Firing of Probationary Employees 

    OAKLAND — California Attorney General Rob Bonta today filed a lawsuit challenging numerous federal agencies for conducting an illegal mass firing of federal probationary employees. In today’s lawsuit, 20 attorneys general argue that the Trump Administration’s Office of Personnel Management’s directive to agencies to terminate probationary employees en masse to reduce the size of the federal workforce exceeds any statutory authority granted by Congress. The lawsuit seeks to immediately halt further firings and reinstate unlawfully terminated federal employees while litigation proceeds.

    “The Trump Administration’s sweeping mass firing of probationary federal employees is simply unlawful,” said Attorney General Bonta. “Not only is the administration breaking the law, while they claim these actions are necessary to ‘curb waste and inefficiency,’ the reality is that abrupt and indiscriminate terminations will lead to increased operation disruptions, higher rehiring costs, and long-term financial burdens on taxpayers. This reckless directive has inflicted chaos and harmed federal workers who are key contributors to our economy and provide critical services that affect the everyday lives of Californians, from offering support for veterans and farmers, to protection of our cherished national parks and lands. I won’t stand idly by as the President attempts yet another unlawful power grab. I am proud to file this lawsuit with my fellow attorneys general across the nation to reinstate unlawfully terminated federal employees and halt further firings.”

    Nationally, there are more than 5.1 million federal workers. Nearly all federal employees serve a one-or two-year probationary period, and more than 200,000 are on probationary status across the federal government. In California, numerous federal employees serve in critical roles across key agencies including the Department of Veterans Affairs, the Department of Agriculture, the National Park Service, and the U.S. Forest Service, among others.

    The abrupt, pretextual termination of federal employees is not only unlawful but also disrupts essential government services and has far reaching economic effects. Specifically, in California, federal employees heavily contribute to our economy by paying state income taxes and generating substantial local revenue. This unlawful reduction in workforce has already caused a 149% increase in state unemployment benefit claims by federal workers and will inevitably impact small businesses through decreased consumer spending and decline in demand. This callous decision not only fuels broader economic uncertainty but directly contradicts yet another of the President’s empty promises to “immediately bring prices down, starting on day one” of his presidency. 

    In the complaint, the attorneys general allege that the Trump Administration’s failure to comply with Reduction in Force (RIF) procedures was arbitrary and capricious, not in accordance with law, and in violation of the federal Administrative Procedures Act. These critical protections ensure that workers and impacted communities receive advance notice of mass layoffs to blunt the disruptions they cause for the affected personnel and their communities and also ensure that personnel such as military veterans are given preference in retaining their jobs.

    When a RIF results in a layoff of 50 or more employees, the agency must generally give at least 60 days’ advance notice to state governments, so they can provide vital “rapid response” information, resources, and services to affected workers. The federal agencies named in the lawsuit failed to provide any advance notice to California, causing significant expense and burden on the state as it scrambles to respond to the sudden mass layoffs of its residents. In the month of February 2025, there was a 149% uptick in unemployment insurance claims filed by individuals recently terminated from federal service. 

    The attorneys general are seeking declaratory relief, a temporary restraining order to pause further mass firings, and preliminary and permanent injunctive relief that would reinstate unlawfully terminated federal employees and enjoin further terminations that do not follow required legal procedures.

    Attorney General Bonta is joined by the attorneys general of Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawai‛i, Illinois, Massachusetts, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Wisconsin, and the District of Columbia in filing this lawsuit. 

    A copy of the complaint can be found here.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI: Bitget Wallet Adds Support for Sahara AI Testnet, Expanding Access to Decentralized AI

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    SAN SALVADOR, El Salvador, March 07, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Bitget Wallet, a leading Web3 non-custodial wallet, has added support for the Sahara AI Testnet, allowing users to connect to the network and interact with its decentralized AI ecosystem. This integration provides Bitget Wallet users with access to Sahara AI’s test environment as the platform explores AI applications in blockchain.

    Users can now add the Sahara AI Testnet directly through Bitget Wallet and claim test tokens via the Sahara AI Faucet on the Discover DApp page. This integration allows users to interact with AI-driven blockchain applications as decentralized AI networks continue to develop. By supporting the testnet, Bitget Wallet expands the range of networks available to its users and provides early access to projects exploring AI and Web3 technologies.

    Sahara AI is an EVM-compatible Layer 1 blockchain focused on decentralizing AI development through blockchain and privacy-preserving technologies. The platform aims to create a transparent and accessible AI economy by decentralizing ownership and governance of AI assets. Its testnet allows participants to contribute to data collection and refinement, with a mainnet launch planned for the third quarter of 2025.

    “As AI and blockchain evolve, decentralized AI platforms are an area of growing interest in Web3,” said Alvin Kan, COO of Bitget Wallet. “By supporting the Sahara AI Testnet, we are providing users with access to a developing AI ecosystem and the opportunity to engage with emerging blockchain applications.”

    About Bitget Wallet
    Bitget Wallet is the home of Web3, uniting endless possibilities in one non-custodial wallet. With over 60 million users, it offers comprehensive onchain services, including asset management, instant swaps, rewards, staking, trading tools, live market data, a DApp browser, an NFT marketplace and crypto payment. Supporting over 100 blockchains, 20,000+ DApps, and 500,000+ tokens, Bitget Wallet enables seamless multi-chain trading across hundreds of DEXs and cross-chain bridges, along with a $300+ million protection fund to ensure safety of users’ assets. Experience Bitget Wallet Lite to start a Web3 journey.

    For more information, visit: X | Telegram | Instagram | YouTube | LinkedIn | TikTok | Discord | Facebook

    For media inquiries, please contact media.web3@bitget.com

    A photo accompanying this announcement is available at https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/27502c7d-2015-4736-9d7f-03c05126a777

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI USA: Senators Urge NRC to Improve Environmental Review Requirements

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for West Virginia Shelley Moore Capito
    WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senator Shelley Moore Capito (R-W.Va.), Chairman of the Senate Environment and Public Works (EPW) Committee, joined U.S. Senators Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), Ranking Member of the EPW Committee, Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.), Chairman of the EPW Clean Air, Climate, and Nuclear Innovation and Safety Subcommittee, and Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.), Ranking Member of the EPW Clean Air, Climate, and Nuclear Innovation and Safety Subcommittee, in sending a letter to David Wright, Chairman of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC).
    In the letter, the Senators encourage the NRC to prioritize voting on the implementation of the Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023 National Environmental Policy Act Amendments, and to do so in accordance with the congressional intent of the Accelerating Deployment of Versatile, Advanced Nuclear for Clean Energy (ADVANCE) Act. Additionally, the Senators urge the NRC to support an ambitious schedule for the completion of the associated rulemaking to update the Commission’s regulations.
    “The NRC’s current environmental review process was established to review legacy nuclear reactor designs and needs to be modernized to allow for the Agency to efficiently carry out its licensing duties to meet today’s urgent energy and environmental needs. The Agency’s current process results in needless delays and additional costs and resources for both the Agency and the applicants. The NRC staff’s recommended actions in the SECY are predominantly productive regulatory updates that would enable the Agency to more efficiently license the safe use of nuclear power – improving predictability, saving time and money, and providing major benefits to the Agency’s licensing process as a whole,” the Senators wrote. 
    Read the full letter here and below: 
    Dear Chairman Wright,
    We request the Commission prioritize voting on the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (“NRC” or “the Agency”) staff proposal, “Implementation of the Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023 National Environmental Policy Act Amendments” (SECY-24-0046 or “SECY”). We encourage the Commission to vote in a manner that fully reflects congressional intent to streamline the NRC’s licensing process, as directed in the Accelerating Deployment of Versatile, Advanced Nuclear for Clean Energy (ADVANCE) Act. As part of your vote, we urge you to support an ambitious schedule for the NRC to complete the associated rulemaking to update the NRC’s regulations.
    Section 506 of the ADVANCE Act required the NRC to report on the efforts of the Commission to “facilitate efficient, timely, and predictable environmental reviews of power reactor applications under section 103 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, including through expanded use of categorical exclusions, environmental assessments, and generic environmental impact statements.” The Commission was also required to report on actions taken to implement the Fiscal Responsibility Act (FRA) amendments to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The Commission submitted that report to Congress on January 6, 2025. The report noted that many of the actions to implement the FRA NEPA amendments are currently awaiting Commission approval as part of the SECY.
    The NRC’s current environmental review process was established to review legacy nuclear reactor designs and needs to be modernized to allow for the Agency to efficiently carry out its licensing duties to meet today’s urgent energy and environmental needs. The Agency’s current process results in needless delays and additional costs and resources for both the Agency and the applicants. The NRC staff’s recommended actions in the SECY are predominantly productive regulatory updates that would enable the Agency to more efficiently license the safe use of nuclear power – improving predictability, saving time and money, and providing major benefits to the Agency’s licensing process as a whole. 
    In addition to the Commission voting on the SECY, we support additional actions to improve the NRC’s environmental review requirements. The ADVANCE Act section 506 report noted the staff can immediately implement a number of efficiencies in the NEPA review without amending NRC’s Part 51 regulations. The NRC should proceed with those actions.
    Further, the NRC recently published the “Generic Environmental Impact Statement for Licensing of New Nuclear Reactors” (or “New Reactor GEIS”) for public comment. The proposed New Reactor GEIS would streamline the environmental review of new reactor license applications by allowing the NRC to focus the review on the significant environmental issues specific to an application’s site and reactor design. The public comment period for the New Reactor GEIS concluded on December 18, 2024. The NRC staff should prioritize updating the proposed GEIS and send the draft final GEIS to the Commission for final approval. The Commission should then expeditiously vote on that proposed final rule.
    We hope that the Commission will strongly take our expectations and the congressional intent embodied in the ADVANCE Act into account for this vote and for future votes on important licensing and regulatory issues. These actions to prioritize updating the NRC’s environmental review process now will result in substantial efficiencies in future licensing actions for both the NRC, licensees, and applicants.
    We thank you for your consideration of our request. We look forward to continuing to work with the Commission to enable the safe and secure use of nuclear power.
    Sincerely,

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI China: Global South should strengthen themselves, stand together in unity, strive for development: Chinese FM

    Source: China State Council Information Office

    Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi, also a member of the Political Bureau of the Communist Party of China Central Committee, attends a press conference on China’s foreign policy and external relations on the sidelines of the third session of the 14th National People’s Congress (NPC) in Beijing, capital of China, March 7, 2025. [Photo by Lun Xiaoxuan/China.org.cn]

    The Global South should strengthen themselves, stand together in unity, and strive for development, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi said Friday.

    “The hallmark of our era is the prominent, growing strength of the Global South,” Wang told a press conference on the sidelines of the ongoing session of the national legislature.

    Accounting over 40 percent of global GDP and contributing as high as 80 percent of global growth, the Global South is a key force for maintaining world peace, driving world development, and improving global governance, according to Wang.

    “The Global South holds the key to bringing stability to the world and making it a better place,” Wang said.

    Noting that Indonesia became a full member of BRICS at the beginning of the year, and nine partner countries have joined the BRICS family, Wang said BRICS is emerging as a backbone of cooperation and an engine of growth in the Global South.

    This year, China will host the Shanghai Cooperation Organization summit, Brazil the BRICS summit, and South Africa the G20 summit. “We should speak in one voice to the world, safeguard our common interests, and steadily increase our representation and voice in global governance,” he said.

    “We should keep development as a central item of international agenda, build up the momentum, enhance our capacity, and advance hand in hand toward modernization,” Wang said.

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Gov. Pillen to Announce Awards for 6 Regions, One Nebraska Priority Projects

    Source: US State of Nebraska

    . Pillen to Announce Awards for 6 Regions, One Nebraska Priority Projects

     

    LINCOLN, NE – On Monday morning in Scottsbluff, Governor Jim Pillen will announce awards for projects in three districts of the State’s 6 Regions, One Nebraska initiative (Central, Mid-Plains, and Western). He will be joined at the news conference by Nebraska Department of Economic Development Director K.C. Belitz, regional leaders, and awarded project applicants.

     

    Launched in 2024, 6 Regions, One Nebraska is encouraging cooperation, rather than competition, among neighboring communities. Thus far, each region has had two large-group meetings, along with numerous virtual work sessions. At the first meeting, leaders reviewed economic and demographic data specific to their community college district. Participants identified priority areas to serve as a starting point for collaborative action. Subsequently, action teams identified potential solutions to address needs and developed one project for which to seek state-administered American Rescue Plan Act funds. At the second meeting, participants heard reports from each action team and discussed steps to move forward with a funding application. Each of the six regions is receiving an award. 

    The Governor previously announced awards for the Metro, Northeast, and Southeast regions. Awards for the remaining three regions will be announced at Monday’s news conference.

     

    This event is open to credentialed media.

     

    What: Gov. Pillen to announce awarded projects through 6 Regions, One Nebraska initiative 

    When: 11:00 a.m. (MT), Monday, March 10

    Where: Hampton Inn, 301 W. Hwy 26, Scottsbluff, NE 69361

    Who: Gov. Jim Pillen will be joined by:

    • K.C. Belitz, Director of the Nebraska Department of Economic Development
    • Community college leaders
    • Regional co-chairs
    • Regional navigators
    • Awarded project applicants

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Gov. Pillen Appoints Kleine as County Court Judge in the Fourth Judicial District

    Source: US State of Nebraska

    . Pillen Appoints Kleine as County Court Judge in the Fourth Judicial District

    LINCOLN, NE – Today, Governor Jim Pillen announced his appointment of Philip K. Kleine of Elkhorn as the county court judge in the Fourth Judicial District. That district consists of Douglas County.

    Kleine is currently an assistant city prosecutor in Omaha. From 2011 to 2021, he was the lead deputy county attorney for Sarpy County. Kleine has also held roles in the Lancaster County Attorney’s office, Douglas County Attorney’s office and in the Nebraska Attorney General’s office. 

    Kleine has been a volunteer with Legal Aid, as well as a volunteer judge for Creighton University in the National Trial Competition. He has taught at Bellevue University and is a presenter at the Sarpy/Douglas County Law Enforcement Academy. 

    This judicial vacancy is due to the retirement of Judge Jeffrey L. Marcuzzo.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Murkowski Questions FDA Nominee

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Alaska Lisa Murkowski
    03.06.25
    Washington, DC – U.S. Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) today questioned the President’s nominee to be Commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Martin Makary, during his appearance before the Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) Committee. Murkowski raised the FDA’s handling of the Vaccine Advisory Committee, the handling of clinical trials for rare diseases, and funding for state and local governments to conduct food safety inspections.
    Full Transcript:
    Senator Murkowski: Doctor, welcome, it was a good conversation that we had, and I appreciated that. I thank you for the encourage to read that provision in your book, it was great airplane reading for me.
    Dr. Makary: Thank you, Senator.
    Senator Murkowski: I also want to thank you for the assurance you gave to Senator Collins regarding the Vaccine Advisory Committee, and ensuring there would be meetings going forward. I think for several of us who had I thought good substantive conversations with Secretary Kennedy, we had received assurances about things like the vaccination committee. So, we’re making sure again that important input goes forward is important to many of us, so I appreciate that.
    I wanted to talk to you this morning about an issue we discussed in my office, and that is with regards to ALS. The FDA’s accelerated approval pathway has really been important, and I think very promising for treatments for ALS and some other rare diseases. You have advocated for using common sense alongside science in regulatory decisions. So, very briefly, how do we define common sense here as it applies to the regulatory decisions of the FDA. How do we make sure that ALS patients who are looking at a very, very limited time frame, they can’t wait for the traditional approval process, there are some emerging measures using digital technologies, is this in your realm of common sense? Give me a little bit of insight here on how you would like to proceed on these approval pathways.
    Dr. Makary. Thank you, Senator. I very much enjoyed our time together, and talking through a bunch of these issues. We have to customize the regulatory process to the condition that we’re trying to be able to offer hope, so, if a condition affects 19 people in the world as a partial triplication chromosome 15 disorder does, or a disease that affects 52 kids in the world, we cannot require two randomized control trials. We have to customize the regulatory process to what we’re trying to do if our goal is to try to provide safe and effective therapies. So, I do believe firmly in that approach, and I do think we can use some commons sense to ask some big questions we’ve never asked before at the FDA. Why does it take 10 years for a drug to get approved? Why does a college student who suffers from chronic abdominal pain for years, and we have no idea what’s going on, and they go to Italy for a summer and they are suddenly cured of their abdominal pain? Why does a peanut allergy medication that’s been safe with data for decades get approved in Europe before the United States when nearly 10% of our population has a food allergy? So, I do think there’s a lot of areas where we can ask, does a drug need to be prescription, when it could be over-the-counter, why are requiring continuous glucose monitors to have a Doctor’s prescription when it’s good for people to use these monitors and learn about what they’re eating. We don’t just want to limit continuous glucose monitoring to people with diabetes, we want to prevent diabetes when 30% of our nation’s children has diabetes or pre-diabetes or some form of early insulin resistance. Why are we holding these tools to help people, empower them about their health, until after they’re sick, same with continuous blood pressure monitoring.
    Senator Murkowski: Well, as you point out, why do we wait. We want to make sure that there is a level of safety, that’s the job there through the FDA. But, again, being able to accelerate these in ways that are meaningful, and to your point, that actually fit with the population that you’re speaking to. So know that I’m going to be pushing you on this, as well as many other advocates out there.
    Dr. Makary: Thank you.
    Senator Murkowski: I want to quickly ask you about food safety inspections. State and local governments conduct about 60% of food processing facility inspections, 90% of produce safety inspections, 100% of retail food inspections. What has happened is we have seen in the Biden Administration, FDA planning to cut funding for state and local food safety programs. This impacts us in the state of Alaska when it comes to our seafood industry, and in other areas. So, I’m looking for a commitment from you that under the Trump Administration, the FDA is going to maintain funding for these contracts with state and local governments. They’ve proven that it’s more cost effective, more efficient, and it also is what Congress has asked for. So I’d like to know that you’re going to be supportive in that regard to state and local governments.
    Dr. Makary: I’m happy to look at that with you, Senator.
    Senator Murkowski: Very good. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. 

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Grassley, Peters Relaunch Bipartisan Effort to Root Out Foreign Influence in U.S. Policy

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Iowa Chuck Grassley

    WASHINGTON – Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee Ranking Member Gary Peters (D-Mich.) reintroduced two bipartisan bills to prevent foreign governments, including adversaries like China and Russia, from shadow influencing U.S. policy. The legislation would help close loopholes that foreign governments exploit to conceal their roles in lobbying efforts.

    “Sunlight is the best disinfectant, and the public has a right to know if a foreign government is trying to sway American policy. Our bipartisan bills would close a loophole that allows individuals to conceal their lobbying efforts and ensure that all foreign actors are disclosed to the American people. The Senate passed our bipartisan legislation last Congress, and I’m going to continue to work diligently with my colleagues to get these vital reforms to the president’s desk,” Grassley said.

    “The American people deserve complete transparency about who is trying to influence our political process. These bipartisan bills will help ensure foreign actors can’t exploit loopholes to hide their activities while attempting to shape policy in the United States. It’s a commonsense step to protect our national security and ensure our government is working in the best interests of the American people,” Peters said.

    Lobbying Disclosure Improvement Act

    Congress created the Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) in 1995 to delineate between those lobbying on behalf of foreign governments versus those lobbying for foreign private entities.  The LDA exempts foreign private entity lobbyists from the Foreign Agents Registration Act’s (FARA) more burdensome restrictions. However, the Justice Department currently has no way of knowing which foreign lobbyists claim this exemption.

    The Lobbying Disclosure Improvement Act would make public which foreign lobbyists receive the LDA exemption, ensuring no foreign government actors can fraudulently and secretly represent themselves as non-government actors. This would help the Justice Department narrow the pool of registrants they are examining for potential FARA violations, without imposing any meaningful additional burden on non-government registrants representing foreign private entities.

    Additional cosponsors include Sens. John Cornyn (R-Texas), Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), Maggie Hassan (D-N.H.) and Josh Hawley (R-Mo.).

    Disclosing Foreign Influence in Lobbying Act

    Law enforcement agencies have identified instances in which foreign adversaries exploit an additional loophole in the Lobbying Disclosure Act by using closely connected private organizations and businesses to push their government interests.

    The Disclosing Foreign Influence in Lobbying Act makes clear that lobbying organizations must disclose when foreign governments and political parties participate in their lobbying efforts, regardless of any financial contribution to the lobbying effort

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: What They Are Saying: Over One Million Law Enforcement Officers Call for Immediate, Clean Senate Passage of HALT Fentanyl Act

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Iowa Chuck Grassley

    WASHINGTON – Major law enforcement organizations representing over 1,000,000 officers nationwide, are calling on the Senate to pass the Halt All Lethal Trafficking of (HALT) Fentanyl Act immediately and without amendments. Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) is leading the push to permanently classify illicit fentanyl-related substances as Schedule I, alongside Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee Chairman Bill Cassidy, M.D. (R-La.) and Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.).

    The White House today reaffirmed the administration’s support for the legislation in its current form. The bill will likely receive a final Senate vote next week.

    Law enforcement organizations backing the HALT Fentanyl Act’s swift and clean passage include the National Fraternal Order of Police, the National Association of Police Organizations, the Major Counties Chiefs Association, the Association of State Criminal Investigative Agencies, the Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association, the Major County Sheriffs of America, the National Alliance of State Drug Enforcement Agencies, the National District Attorneys Association, the National HIDTA Directors Association, the National Narcotic Officers’ Associations’ Coalition, the National Sheriffs’ Association and the NYPD Sergeants Benevolent Association.

    The above organizations represent law enforcement agencies across all 50 states, including the major metropolitan areas of New York City, Miami, Orlando, Atlanta, Chicago, Los Angeles and Houston.

    Here’s what they’re saying:

    The National Association of Police Organizations: 
    “Time is of the essence. The DEA’s temporary authority to schedule all fentanyl-related substances as Schedule I drugs under the Controlled Substances Act ends on March 31… We supported the technical changes that had to be made when the Judiciary Committee approved the manager’s amendment last week, but otherwise urged the Committee to advance this critical legislation without further modification, which it did… We are now urging the Senate to swiftly pass S. 331 without amendment

    The National Fraternal Order of Police:
    “[The Halt Fentanyl Act], which permanently places fentanyl-related substances as a class into Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act, would save lives and make our communities safer. We thank Leader Thune for putting the bill on the floor and strongly urge the Senate to pass it without amendment.”

    The Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association:
    “FLEOA thanks @LeaderJohnThune for advancing S. 331/HALT Fentanyl Act. We urge all Senators to quickly pass this measure as-is, without further amendment, and give @DEAHQ permanent scheduling authority for fentanyl-related substances.”

    The Major County Sheriffs of America: 
    “The opioid crisis is devastating our nation. The Senate must pass the HALT Fentanyl Act without delay or changes to give law enforcement the tools to combat this deadly epidemic. We can’t afford further delay – let’s act now for public safety.”

    The NYPD Sergeants Benevolent Association: 
    “Last month, the Sergeants Benevolent Association joined its partner law enforcement organizations in calling on the Judiciary Committee to advance this critical legislation without delay or modification. We now respectfully request that all senators support passage of S. 331 as approved by the Judiciary Committee and without further amendment.”

    A coalition of 11 national, state and local law enforcement organizations: 
    “The opioid epidemic continues to claim the lives of hundreds of Americans every day. As this crisis escalates, every delay in addressing it only increases the toll on our communities. For the sake of public safety, it is imperative that the Senate pass the HALT Fentanyl Act as it stands, without changes, and move it forward to law.”

    -30-

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Grassley Statement on Executive Action to Lower Proposed Tariffs on Canadian Potash

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Iowa Chuck Grassley

    WASHINGTON – Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), a member of the Senate Agriculture Committee and a lifelong family farmer, released the following statement following President Trump’s executive action on the proposed duty on Canadian potash. Potash is a key ingredient in fertilizer. Tariffs on Canadian imports are now expected to begin April 2.

    “President Trump is using tariffs as a negotiating tool to halt the deadly flow of fentanyl. I agree this is a deadly crisis, and it’s why I’m currently leading the HALT Fentanyl Act’s passage through Congress.

    “For four years, farmers suffered under Joe Biden and Kamala Harris’ reckless policies that drove up input costs, especially for fertilizer. I appreciate President Trump showing understanding for farmers by lowering the proposed tariffs on Canadian potash.

    “Alongside President Trump, I’ll continue working to ensure farmers aren’t left behind like they were during the Biden-Harris administration.”

    -30-

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Hawai‘i Congressional Delegation Introduces Legislation To Protect State’s Native Species

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Hawaii Brian Schatz

    WASHINGTON – U.S. Senators Brian Schatz (D-Hawai‘i) and Mazie K. Hirono (D-Hawai‘i), along with U.S. Representatives Ed Case (D-Hawai‘i) and Jill Tokuda (D-Hawai‘i), introduced legislation to protect more than 10,000 plant and animal species native to the Hawaiian Islands. The Hawai‘i Native Species Conservation and Recovery Act would fund conservation and recovery projects addressing invasive species, the ecological consequences of climate change, native species’ habitats, and population recovery. Schatz met with The Nature Conservancy, Hawai‘i today to discuss the bill and other priorities.

    “Native species foster a healthy ecosystem, with cleaner air, purer water, and a more resilient environment,” said Senator Schatz. “By funding new conservation measures and recovery projects, including for Native Hawaiian organizations and local non-profits, our bill will help save our native species for years to come.”

    The 10,000 species native to Hawai‘i represent the highest degree of endemism in the world, but hundreds of these species are listed as endangered. The state’s unique biodiversity is in the midst of an extinction crisis, with more than half of native birds and more than 100 unique plant species already extinct.

    The Hawai‘i Native Species Conservation and Recovery Act would:

    • Provide funding through cooperative agreements and grants to the State of Hawai‘i, local governments, Native Hawaiian organizations, non-profit organizations, businesses, and institutions of higher education to protect native species;
    • Support coordinated, evidence-based conservation and recovery projects addressing invasive species, the ecological consequences of climate change, native species’ habitats, and population recovery, as well as data collection and public outreach and education measures;
    • Require the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to coordinate with other federal and state agencies to develop annual funding priorities and criteria for ranking project proposals;
    • Require a 25 percent non-federal match for most projects;
    • Encourage applications for high impact, small dollar value projects, projects carried out by Native Hawaiian organizations, and projects promoting youth workforce readiness by waiving the non-federal match requirement for such projects; and
    • Authorize $30 million annually, subject to appropriations, to protect native species for ten years.

    “Unique to our islands, Hawai‘i’s native species are critical to maintaining the health, balance, and biodiversity of our ecosystem,” said Senator Hirono. “Through initiatives such as funding conservation and recovery projects that address topics including invasive species, scientific research, and data collection, this legislation will help to preserve Hawai‘i’s ecosystems and safeguard the environment for future generations.”

    “In Hawai‘i, invasives have caused significant ecological damage, threatening the survival of our unique plant and animal species,” said Representative Case. “Protecting Hawai‘i’s unique biodiversity is not just an environmental necessity, but a cultural imperative that embraces our Native Hawaiian heritage. Unfortunately, these native species often lack the defenses to compete with or resist the pressures of invasive plants and animals, which can rapidly alter ecosystems and displace local species and requires intervention to prevent and reverse.”

    “From ?ohi?a to kiwikiu, Hawai?i is home to some of the most stunning native biodiversity in the world, and we need to work collaboratively to protect and preserve our unique and fragile ecosystem,” said Representative Tokuda. “I am proud to support the Hawai‘i Native Species Conservation and Recovery Act to provide much-needed support for coordinated conservation projects across our state, protect our cultural assets, and ensure our native species can thrive for generations to come.”

    The bill is endorsed by The Nature Conservancy, Hawai‘i Conservation Council, Friends of Hakalau Forest National Wildlife Refuge, National Tropical Botanical Garden, American Bird Conservancy, and National Wildlife Federation.

    “Our community in Hawai‘i continues to rise to the challenge protecting our most vulnerable species. I want to thank Senator Schatz, Congressman Case and the rest of our Hawai‘i delegation for enabling the vision of our local communities to become a reality,” said Ulalia Woodside Lee, Executive Director of The Nature Conservancy Hawai‘i and Palmyra. “If enacted, this bill would add much needed support to ensure we can protect our treasured biodiversity and help build capacity in our local communities to malama ‘aina.”

    Senator Schatz met with representatives from TNC Hawai‘i and Palmyra to discuss the bill.

    “This groundbreaking legislation, would ensure protections against invasive species and ensures the viability of Hawai‘i’s endemic species and ecosystems that supports them from extinction. These species are found nowhere else on our planet. If implemented, this legislation will be a win for Hawai‘i, the U.S., and the world in being at the helm of protecting endangered species from becoming extinct. This will also set a course of action to help reverse the current situation of Hawai‘i being the extinction species capitol of the world by eradicating invasive species, foster and the restore biodiversity and help to stabilize our climate. Additionally, this measure will help to protect food sources and the community from harmful invasive pests, as well as, increase employment opportunities. There is no time to lose; we urge Congress to swiftly pass the Native Species Conservation and Recovery Act,” said Jonee Peters, Executive Director for the Conservation Council for Hawai‘i.

    “Hawai‘i is home to some of the most unique and threatened plants and animals found anywhere in the world. The Hawai‘i Native Species Conservation and Recovery Act would be a significant step toward addressing the many challenges of protecting and recovering these irreplaceable natural and cultural resources. Many of Hawai‘i’s exceptional native species are quite literally on the brink of extinction; we urge Congress to pass this Act as soon as possible,” said Debbie Anderson, President of the Friends of Hakalau Forest National Wildlife Refuge.

    “The National Tropical Botanical Garden strongly supports the proposed Hawai‘i Native Species Conservation and Recovery Act of 2025 because it aligns perfectly with NTBG’s mission to preserve and protect native plant species, restore ecosystems, and advance scientific research and education. By providing funding for community involvement and youth workforce training, the act would help ensure that future generations of conservationists and scientists are equipped to protect Hawai‘i’s fragile ecosystems. Supporting the Hawai‘i Native Species Conservation and Recovery Act of 2025 is not just beneficial for NTBG — it is essential for the future of Hawai‘i’s native ecosystems,” said Tami Rollins, Interim CEO of the National Tropical Botanical Garden.

    “Birds such as the ‘I’iwi represent Hawai‘i’s extraordinary biodiversity. However, ‘I’iwi and countless other species are facing unprecedented challenges from threats like avian malaria. Thanks to Sen. Schatz for introducing the Hawai‘i Native Species Conservation and Recovery Act, which would address threats to native species by supporting community-led projects, ensuring native Hawaiian ecosystems are present for our keiki,” said Chris Farmer, Hawai‘i Program Director at American Bird Conservancy.

    The full text of the bill is available here.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Fact Sheet: President Donald J. Trump Establishes the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and U.S. Digital Asset Stockpile

    US Senate News:

    Source: The White House
    CREATING A STRATEGIC BITCOIN RESERVE AND DIGITAL ASSET STOCKPILE: Today, President Donald J. Trump signed an Executive Order to establish a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and a U.S. Digital Asset Stockpile, positioning the United States as a leader among nations in government digital asset strategy.
    The Order creates a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve that will treat bitcoin as a reserve asset.
    The Strategic Bitcoin Reserve will be capitalized with bitcoin owned by the Department of Treasury that was forfeited as part of criminal or civil asset forfeiture proceedings.  Other agencies will evaluate their legal authority to transfer any bitcoin owned by those agencies to the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve.
    The United States will not sell bitcoin deposited into this Strategic Bitcoin Reserve, which will be maintained as a store of reserve assets.
    The Secretaries of Treasury and Commerce are authorized to develop budget-neutral strategies for acquiring additional bitcoin, provided that those strategies impose no incremental costs on American taxpayers.

    It also established a U.S. Digital Asset Stockpile, consisting of digital assets other than bitcoin owned by the Department of Treasury that was forfeited in criminal or civil asset forfeiture proceedings.
    The government will not acquire additional assets for the U.S. Digital Asset Stockpile beyond those obtained through forfeiture proceedings.
    The Secretary of the Treasury may determine strategies for responsible stewardship, including potential sales from the U.S. Digital Asset Stockpile.

    Agencies must provide a full accounting of their digital asset holdings to the Secretary of the Treasury and the President’s Working Group on Digital Asset Markets.
    This Order ensures a strategic approach to managing digital assets under U.S. control.
    ADDRESSING A CRYPTO MANAGEMENT GAP:
    Bitcoin, the original cryptocurrency, is referred to as “digital gold” because of its scarcity and security, having never been hacked.
    With a fixed supply of 21 million coins, there is a strategic advantage to being among the first nations to create a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve.
    The United States currently holds a significant amount of bitcoin but has not maximized its strategic position as a unique store of value in the global financial system.
    Premature sales of bitcoin have already cost U.S. taxpayers over $17 billion.

    The Executive Order begins to resolve the current disjointed handling of cryptocurrencies seized through forfeiture by, and scattered across, various Federal agencies.
    Currently, no clear policy exists for managing these assets, leading to a lack of accountability and inadequate exploration of options to centralize, secure, or maximize their value.
    Taking affirmative steps to centralize ownership, control, and management of these assets within the Federal government will ensure proper oversight, accurate tracking, and a cohesive approach to managing the government’s cryptocurrency holdings.
    This move harnesses the power of digital assets for national prosperity, rather than letting them languish in limbo.
    DELIVERING ON PLEDGE TO MAKE AMERICA THE CRYPTO CAPITAL OF THE WORLD: President Trump is fulfilling his promise to position America as the global leader in cryptocurrency.
    President Trump promised to make the United States the “crypto capital of the world,” emphasizing the need to embrace digital assets to drive economic growth and technological leadership.
    In his first week in office, President Trump signed an Executive Order to promote United States leadership in digital assets such as cryptocurrency.
    President Trump has consistently advocated for a forward-thinking approach to crypto, stating: “I am very positive and open minded to cryptocurrency companies, and all things related to this new and burgeoning industry. Our country must be the leader in the field.”
    President Trump promised to create a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and a Digital Assets Stockpile.
    President Trump appointed a “crypto czar” and is hosting the first-ever crypto summit at the White House, just a few of the many ways this Administration is demonstrating its strong commitment to this digital asset.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: ESTABLISHMENT OF THE STRATEGIC BITCOIN RESERVE AND UNITED STATES DIGITAL ASSET STOCKPILE

    US Senate News:

    Source: The White House
    class=”has-text-align-left”>By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered:
         Section 1.  Background.  Bitcoin is the original cryptocurrency.  The Bitcoin protocol permanently caps the total supply of bitcoin (BTC) at 21 million coins, and has never been hacked.  As a result of its scarcity and security, Bitcoin is often referred to as “digital gold”.  Because there is a fixed supply of BTC, there is a strategic advantage to being among the first nations to create a strategic bitcoin reserve.  The United States Government currently holds a significant amount of BTC, but has not implemented a policy to maximize BTC’s strategic position as a unique store of value in the global financial system.  Just as it is in our country’s interest to thoughtfully manage national ownership and control of any other resource, our Nation must harness, not limit, the power of digital assets for our prosperity.  
         Sec. 2.  Policy.  It is the policy of the United States to establish a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve.  It is further the policy of the United States to establish a United States Digital Asset Stockpile that can serve as a secure account for orderly and strategic management of the United States’ other digital asset holdings.
         Sec. 3.  Creation and Administration of the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and United States Digital Asset Stockpile.       (a)  The Secretary of the Treasury shall establish an office to administer and maintain control of custodial accounts collectively known as the “Strategic Bitcoin Reserve,” capitalized with all BTC held by the Department of the Treasury that was finally forfeited as part of criminal or civil asset forfeiture proceedings or in satisfaction of any civil money penalty imposed by any executive department or agency (agency) and that is not needed to satisfy requirements under 31 U.S.C. 9705 or released pursuant to subsection (d) of this section (Government BTC).  Within 30 days of the date of this order, each agency shall review its authorities to transfer any Government BTC held by it to the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and shall submit a report reflecting the result of that review to the Secretary of the Treasury.  Government BTC deposited into the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve shall not be sold and shall be maintained as reserve assets of the United States utilized to meet governmental objectives in accordance with applicable law.       (b)  The Secretary of the Treasury shall establish an office to administer and maintain control of custodial accounts collectively known as the “United States Digital Asset Stockpile,” capitalized with all digital assets owned by the Department of the Treasury, other than BTC, that were finally forfeited as part of criminal or civil asset forfeiture proceedings and that are not needed to satisfy requirements under 31 U.S.C. 9705 or released pursuant to subsection (d) of this section (Stockpile Assets).  Within 30 days of the date of this order, each agency shall review its authorities to transfer any Stockpile Assets held by it to the United States Digital Asset Stockpile and shall submit a report reflecting the result of that review to the Secretary of the Treasury.  The Secretary of the Treasury shall determine strategies for responsible stewardship of the United States Digital Asset Stockpile in accordance with applicable law.     (c)  The Secretary of the Treasury and the Secretary of Commerce shall develop strategies for acquiring additional Government BTC provided that such strategies are budget neutral and do not impose incremental costs on United States taxpayers.  However, the United States Government shall not acquire additional Stockpile Assets other than in connection with criminal or civil asset forfeiture proceedings or in satisfaction of any civil money penalty imposed by any agency without further executive or legislative action.        (d)  “Government Digital Assets” means all Government BTC and all Stockpile Assets.  The head of each agency shall not sell or otherwise dispose of any Government Digital Assets, except in connection with the Secretary of the Treasury’s exercise of his lawful authority and responsible stewardship of the United States Digital Asset Stockpile pursuant to subsection (b) of this section, or pursuant to an order from a court of competent jurisdiction, as required by law, or in cases where the Attorney General or other relevant agency head determines that the Government Digital Assets (or the proceeds from the sale or disposition thereof) can and should:           (i)    be returned to identifiable and verifiable victims of crime;           (ii)   be used for law enforcement operations;            (iii)  be equitably shared with State and local law enforcement partners; or           (iv)   be released to satisfy requirements under 31 U.S.C. 9705, 28 U.S.C. 524(c), 18 U.S.C. 981, or 21 U.S.C. 881.      (e)  Within 60 days of the date of this order, the Secretary of the Treasury shall deliver an evaluation of the legal and investment considerations for establishing and managing the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and United States Digital Asset Stockpile going forward, including the accounts in which the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and United States Digital Asset Stockpile should be located and the need for any legislation to operationalize any aspect of this order or the proper management and administration of such accounts.
         Sec. 4.  Accounting.  Within 30 days of the date of this order, the head of each agency shall provide the Secretary of the Treasury and the President’s Working Group on Digital Asset Markets with a full accounting of all Government Digital Assets in such agency’s possession, including any information regarding the custodial accounts in which such Government Digital Assets are currently held that would be necessary to facilitate a transfer of the Government Digital Assets to the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve or the United States Digital Asset Stockpile.  If such agency holds no Government Digital Assets, such agency shall confirm such fact to the Secretary of the Treasury and the President’s Working Group on Digital Asset Markets within 30 days of the date of this order.  
         Sec. 5.  General Provisions.  (a)  Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:          (i)   the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or          (ii)  the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.     (b)  This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.     (c)  This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.
    THE WHITE HOUSE,    March 6, 2025

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Senator Collins, Bipartisan Group Introduce Bill to Improve Veterans’ Access to High-Quality Mental Health Care

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Maine Susan Collins

    Washington, D.C. – U.S. Senators Susan Collins, John Cornyn (R-TX), Maggie Hassan (D-NH), Michael Bennet (D-CO), Bill Cassidy (R-LA), Gary Peters (D–MI), John Fetterman (D-PA) and Thom Tillis (R-NC) today introduced the Veterans Mental Health and Addiction Therapy Quality of Care Act, bipartisan legislation that would require an independent organization outside of the government to conduct a study to assess the quality of care veterans receive for mental and addiction health treatment from providers within and outside the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).

    “Our veterans made the honorable decision to serve our country, and we have a responsibility to ensure they receive the best possible health care during and after their service,” said Senator Collins. “Too many veterans face serious mental health struggles, including PTSD and addiction, yet they often encounter barriers to getting the care they need. By reviewing the quality of mental health and addiction treatment available to them—both within and outside the VA—this bipartisan legislation would help improve access to higher-quality care, so that fewer veterans are left without the support they deserve.”

    The Department of Veterans Affairs is home to the nation’s largest integrated health care system that provides comprehensive health services to U.S. military veterans who are enrolled. However, recent estimates indicate that as many as 70% of VA-eligible veterans received their care from external providers. Given the high rate of veteran suicide due to mental and addiction health conditions, a study is needed to better understand if current practices provide our veterans with the best mental and addiction quality of care.

    Specifically, The Veterans Mental Health and Addiction Therapy Quality of Care Act would require an independent study to:

    • Analyze the results of comparable instances of addiction and mental health care between inside and outside providers using objective criteria such as symptom scores and suicide risk;
    • Ascertain to what extent outside providers are using evidence-based practices in the treatment of addiction and mental health issues;
    • Identify potential gaps in coordination between internal and external providers in responding to individuals seeking addiction or mental health care;
    • Evaluate the availability of coordinated care for veterans who have separate or related conditions which may be impacting their mental health;
    • Assess providers’ military cultural competency;
    • Gauge the ease and flexibility of sharing medical records with a veteran’s health care team;
    • Consider to what extent providers are conducting outcome monitoring throughout a veteran’s treatment to track progress or lack thereof; and
    • Measure overall patient satisfaction.

    The legislation is supported by the Disabled American Veterans Association, the American Psychological Association, and the Veteran Health Care Policy Initiative.

    The full text of the bill can be read here.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Resolution Designating March 6 as “National Slam the Scam Day” Unanimously Passes Senate

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Maine Susan Collins

    Washington, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senator Susan Collins joined Senators Rick Scott (R-FL), Mark Kelly (D-AZ), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), Ashley Moody (R-FL), Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), and Mike Rounds (R-SD) in announcing the designation of March 6, 2025 as “National Slam the Scam Day” following the unanimous Senate passage of their bipartisan resolution to raise awareness of scams targeting older Americans. As one in four people have reported being scammed out of money, and with losses surpassing $10 billion in 2023 alone, this growing issue continues to threaten American seniors’ golden years.

    “‘National Slam the Scam Day’ provides a great opportunity for federal, state, and local officials to raise awareness about common financial scams and deliver a clear message to Americans: hang up and tell someone,” said Senator Collins. “Public awareness is key to stopping these scams from the start. Let’s work together to put nefarious scammers out of business once and for all.”

    The Senators’ resolution highlights the importance of education and prevention efforts aimed at combating financial scams, encouraging Americans to stay vigilant, report suspicious activities and share essential information to protect themselves and others.

    The complete text of the resolution is available here.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Ranking Members Padilla, Morelle Continue to Press Trump Administration on Firings of Election Security Workers, Pause of Critical Election Security Efforts

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Alex Padilla (D-Calif.)

    Ranking Members Padilla, Morelle Continue to Press Trump Administration on Firings of Election Security Workers, Pause of Critical Election Security Efforts

    Lawmakers’ letter follows lack of response to letter about the firings of CISA employees who worked on election security

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — U.S. Senator Alex Padilla (D-Calif.), Ranking Member of the Senate Committee on Rules and Administration, and U.S. Representative Joe Morelle (N.Y.-25), Ranking Member of the Committee on House Administration, continued pressing senior officials at the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) for answers on the status of their election-related work. This comes after not receiving a response to their letter last month on the firings of CISA employees who previously worked on election security, including misinformation and disinformation issues.

    “As Ranking Members of the House and Senate Committees with jurisdiction over federal elections, we have a right to understand the changes occurring at CISA given its critical election security mission,” wrote the lawmakers. “Failure to respond to these questions is deeply disturbing given so many high-ranking administration officials’ refusals to accept the outcome of legitimate elections and involvement in spreading election-related mis- and disinformation.”

    Since their original letter, more CISA employees have been put on administrative leave, and CISA has paused election security efforts as they rush through an internal assessment behind closed doors without consulting Congress or state and local election officials. Meanwhile, employees of President Trump and Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), including a 19-year-old staffer tied to interactions with cybercriminals, have infiltrated CISA’s systems. 

    “Election infrastructure is critical infrastructure. Changes at CISA could have dramatic impacts on future elections — the cornerstone of our democracy,” continued the lawmakers. “Without a reasonable, transparent process that consults with Congress and Chief Election Officials on a bipartisan basis, we are alarmed that political leadership at DHS and DOGE is directing CISA to undercut the security of our elections, making us more vulnerable to malign foreign actors and risking the safety of election officials.”

    The lawmakers also condemned the permanent termination without notice of federal funds for the Election Infrastructure Information Sharing and Analysis Center (EI-ISAC). EI-ISAC is an essential resource for threat monitoring and coordination between state officials on election security matters.

    Additionally, the lawmakers highlighted a February 21, 2025, letter from the bipartisan National Association of Secretaries of State to Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, and pushed CISA to consult with election officials while conducting their assessment. The Secretaries’ letter underscores the need for CISA’s services to ensure the successful administration of elections.

    Last week, Padilla and Morelle expressed serious concerns about the dangerous implications for elections following President Trump’s executive order purporting to bring independent regulatory agencies under total control of the White House. Padilla previously denounced the illegal firing of FEC Chair Weintraub and led 10 Democratic Senators to demand President Trump rescind this decision. 

    Full text of the letter is available here and below:

    Dear Ms. Bean and Ms. Harrington:

    We are concerned by the lack of timely written response to our February 13, 2025, letter on the status of the election-related work and the treatment of employees at the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA). Since the sending of that letter, several additional, disturbing reports have come to light, including (1) more CISA employees have been put on administrative leave, (2) election security efforts have been paused during a secretive review that is being rushed through without consultation with Congress or state and local election officials, and (3) employees of the U.S. Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), including at least one who is a known cybersecurity risk, are reworking CISA without any transparency.

    We expect a thorough and substantive response to both letters, and a briefing on the results of the assessment following its anticipated conclusion on March 6, 2025, with a discussion of any anticipated changes to the agency prior to any being finalized. While we recognize that CISA and DOGE is declining to communicate with Congress on individual personnel decisions, Congress has a right to understand the overall personnel numbers and structural changes occurring at CISA. We reiterate our request for information on the numbers of CISA employees whose work, in whole or in part, covered election-related matters that have either been placed on administrative leave or fired. Our committees have received information that the number of election security officials put on leave is greater than initially reported and public reports indicate that 130 CISA employees have been fired already.

    We understand that CISA launched a review of its election security work soon after receiving our February 13 letter. While we understand the assessment of the agency’s work remains ongoing—with a reported March 6 deadline—we urge your continued commitment to maintaining elections as a key component of CISA’s core mission. Additionally, we call your attention to the February 21, 2025, letter from the bipartisan National Association of Secretaries of State and urge you to consult with key Congressional committees and Chief Election Officials before the conclusion of the assessment. In their letter, the Secretaries noted the importance of CISA’s services, including cybersecurity services, physical security assessments, planning resources, and briefings on the foreign threats facing our election systems at the state and local level. While we encourage CISA to ensure these services remain intact, decisions to upend these programs after a three-week review without seriously considering the input of Members of Congress or the individuals running elections in the states would be irresponsible and shortsighted.

    We are also gravely concerned about the permanent termination of federal funds for the Election Infrastructure Information Sharing and Analysis Center (EI-ISAC). The EI-ISAC played a critical role in threat monitoring and coordination between state officials, and the lack of notice prior to the termination of federal funding has left states unable to accept the services of the Center for Internet Security. We recommend restoring federal funding for the EI-ISAC as soon as possible. If CISA or DOGE refuse to do so, they owe Congress a substantive explanation for this decision and details of how CISA will be providing these services to states in the absence of the EI-ISAC.

    Furthermore, we are shocked by public reporting that an inexperienced DOGE staffer with a history of engagement with hacking groups, and who was fired for leaking sensitive information from a previous job, is now working at CISA. We demand an immediate answer as to how many DOGE employees are currently housed at CISA, as well as the level of access they have been given to sensitive information. Senior Advisor to the President Elon Musk has publicly committed the Administration and DOGE to the highest levels of transparency, and we expect a full accounting for DOGE’s activities at an agency with a mission as sensitive as CISA’s.

    As Ranking Members of the House and Senate Committees with jurisdiction over federal elections, we have a right to understand the changes occurring at CISA given its critical election security mission. Failure to respond to these questions is deeply disturbing given so many high-ranking administration officials’ refusals to accept the outcome of legitimate elections and involvement in spreading election-related mis- and disinformation. Election infrastructure is critical infrastructure. Changes at CISA could have dramatic impacts on future elections – the cornerstone of our democracy. Without a reasonable, transparent process that consults with Congress and Chief Election Officials on a bipartisan basis, we are alarmed that political leadership at DHS and DOGE is directing CISA to undercut the security of our elections, making us more vulnerable to malign foreign actors and risking the safety of election officials.

    Thank you for your attention to this matter and we look forward to your prompt response, no later than Monday, March 17.

    Sincerely,

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Padilla, Klobuchar Lead Charge Urging USDA to Reinstate Hispanic-Serving Institution Fellowship Program

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Alex Padilla (D-Calif.)

    Padilla, Klobuchar Lead Charge Urging USDA to Reinstate Hispanic-Serving Institution Fellowship Program

    Senators to USDA: “The Department’s decision to suspend EKDLG Fellowship Program threatens the U.S. agricultural workforce pipeline and the opportunities this program provides educators and students nationwide”

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — Today, U.S. Senators Alex Padilla (D-Calif.), chair of the Senate Hispanic-Serving Institutions (HSI) Caucus, and Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), Ranking Member of the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry, led 11 Democratic Senators in calling on the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to immediately reinstate its HSI E. Kika De La Garza (EKDLG) Fellowship Program. The program, suspended by the Trump Administration, supports the nation’s agricultural workforce while uplifting professionals and students of all backgrounds at HSIs, including non-Latino students.

    USDA established the nonpartisan EKDLG Fellowship Program in 1998, designing the program to strengthen educational partnerships between faculty, staff, and administrators from HSIs and USDA. These partnerships support professional development, workforce development, and exposure opportunities for HSIs nationwide, offering critical insight and understanding of the federal government.

    “USDA’s partnership with HSIs and Hispanic Serving Agricultural Colleges and Universities (HSACUs) plays a vital role in establishing a collaborative relationship and creating a nationwide network of educators working with USDA to help grow the next generation of the American agricultural workforce,” wrote the Senators.

    “The Department’s decision to suspend EKDLG Fellowship Program threatens the U.S. agricultural workforce pipeline and the opportunities this program provides educators and students nationwide,” continued the Senators. “We urge you to immediately reinstate the E. Kika De La Garza Fellowship Program, similar to Department’s reinstatement of the 1890 National Scholars Program, and to collaborate with Congress to ensure its long-term stability.”

    Programs like the USDA EKDLG Fellowship Program are built to help students reach their full potential and reinforce America’s agricultural workforce pipeline. The 2024 EKDLG Program included eight fellowships in Texas, six in Arizona, five in California, four in New York, two in Illinois, one in New Mexico, one in Colorado, one in New Jersey, one in Florida, one in Connecticut, and one in Washington.

    Hispanic-Serving Institutions are not-for-profit institutions of higher learning with 25 percent or higher total undergraduate Hispanic or Latino full-time students. There are 600 HSIs in the United States that enroll over 5.2 million Hispanic students, two-thirds of all Hispanic undergraduates, and 32.2 percent of total Pell Grant recipients — empowering and improving communities. California is home to 172 HSIs and 45 Emerging HSIs.

    In addition to Senators Padilla and Klobuchar, the letter is also signed by Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Senators Michael Bennet (D-Colo.), Cory Booker (D-N.J.), Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.), Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), and Ron Wyden (D-Ore.).

    The letter is endorsed by the Hispanic Association of Colleges and Universities (HACU) and UnidosUS.

    As chair of the Senate HSI Caucus, Senator Padilla has been a strong advocate for expanding educational opportunities for Latino students. Last year, Padilla passed a bipartisan resolution to designate National Hispanic-Serving Institutions Week. In 2023, Padilla introduced the bicameral, bipartisan Hispanic Educational Resources and Empowerment (HERE) Act, which aims to provide Hispanic and Latino students with the necessary tools and resources to lessen the higher education achievement gap.

    Previously, Padilla and Senator John Cornyn (R-Texas) passed a bipartisan resolution expressing support to close the gap in STEM jobs among Latino students and young professionals entering the workforce. Padilla also unveiled a bipartisan resolution in 2022 recognizing the 30th anniversary of the Hispanic National Internship Program (HNIP), a seminal program of the Hispanic Association of Colleges and Universities known for promoting Latino excellence and creating greater career development opportunities for Latino and Hispanic students across the country.

    Full text of the letter is available here and below:

    Dear Secretary Rollins,

    We write to express our significant concerns about the suspension of the USDA Hispanic-Serving (HSI) E. Kika De La Garza (EKDLG) Fellowship Program and to ask that you immediately reinstate it.

    The EKDLG Fellowship Program was established in 1998 by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), and the program has had consistent support from every presidential administration since its establishment. The program strengthens educational partnerships between faculty, staff, and administrators from HSIs and USDA.

    The EKDLG Fellowship Program is non-partisan and supports increasing the professional development, workforce development, and exposure opportunities for faculty, staff, and students nationwide. USDA’s partnership with HSIs and Hispanic Serving Agricultural Colleges and Universities (HSACUs) plays a vital role in establishing a collaborative relationship and creating a nationwide network of educators working with USDA to help grow the next generation of the American agricultural workforce. These fellowships are open to faculty, staff, and administrators of all backgrounds that are employed at HSIs or Hispanic-Serving School Districts and students of all backgrounds are eligible to participate.

    HSIs are economic engines and shape our nation’s agricultural workforce. In 2022, HSIs enrolled 5.2 million students, including 66% of all Hispanic undergraduate students and over 31% of all college students in non-profit postsecondary institutions in the country. Programs like the EKDLG Fellowship Program equip educators with the tools to help students reach their full potential and support the nation’s agricultural workforce pipeline. For example, the list of 2024 EKDLG participants shows the program’s nationwide impact:

    1. University of Houston, Sugar Land, Texas

    2. New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico

    3. The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona

    4. Arizona Western College, Yuma, Arizona

    5. Coastal Bend College, Beeville, Texas

    6. Adams State University, Alamosa, Colorado

    7. California State University, Chico, Chico, California

    8. Montclair State University, Montclair, New Jersey

    9. Texas A&M University, Kingsville, Texas

    10. Mesa Community College, Mesa, Arizona

    11. Hartnell College, Salinas, California

    12. Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas

    13. City Colleges of Chicago, Harold Washington College, Chicago, Illinois

    14. Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas

    15. Maricopa Community Colleges, Tempe, Arizona

    16. University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut

    17. Waubonsee Community College, Sugar Grove, Illinois

    18. Northern Arizona University, Yuma, Arizona

    19. University of California, Santa Barbara, California

    20. Cuesta College, San Luis Obispo, California

    21. University of Texas, San Antonio, Texas

    22. CUNY New York City College of Technology, Brooklyn, New York

    23. CUNY Hunter College, New York, New York

    24. Florida International University, Miami, Florida

    25. California State University, Fresno, California

    26. Arizona State University, Mesa, Arizona

    27. Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas

    28. The University of Texas, Rio Grande Valley, Edinburg, Texas

    29. Mt. Adams School District #209, White Swan, Washington

    30. The Urban Assembly New York Harbor School, New York, New York

    31. John Bowne High School, Flushing, New York

    The Department’s decision to suspend EKDLG Fellowship Program threatens the U.S. agricultural workforce pipeline and the opportunities this program provides educators and students nationwide.

    We urge you to immediately reinstate the E. Kika De La Garza Fellowship Program, similar to Department’s reinstatement of the 1890 National Scholars Program, and to collaborate with Congress to ensure its long-term stability.

    Sincerely,

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Padilla, Schiff, Whitehouse Blast Trump and Zeldin’s Weaponization of EPA as GAO Determines Clean Air Act Waivers Not Subject to Congressional Review Act

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Alex Padilla (D-Calif.)

    Padilla, Schiff, Whitehouse Blast Trump and Zeldin’s Weaponization of EPA as GAO Determines Clean Air Act Waivers Not Subject to Congressional Review Act

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — Today, in response to the Government Accountability Office’s (GAO) finding that Clean Air Act waivers to California are not subject to the Congressional Review Act, U.S. Senators Alex Padilla (D-Calif.), Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), and Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), members of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, issued the following joint statement:

    “By ignoring decades of precedent and the plain text of the Congressional Review Act, the Trump EPA is attempting to sell out our nation’s public health and environmental protections to the same polluting industries that bankrolled much of Trump’s campaign. Congress put in place California’s ability to set vehicle emissions standards in the Clean Air Act, and California emission standards have protected generations of Americans against fossil fuel emissions that poison our air and heat our planet. President Trump and Administrator Zeldin’s weaponization of the EPA in service of the polluters the agency is tasked with policing directly attacks our nation’s ability to breathe clean air and reduce the planet-warming carbon pollution that is fueling extreme weather. 

    “GAO’s views on what agency actions are subject to the Congressional Review Act have historically carried great weight, and we thank the agency for its attention to this matter.” 

    Yesterday, Senator Padilla questioned nominees for senior posts at the Environmental Protection Agency on California’s Clean Air Act waivers, stressing that they do not fall under the purview of the Congressional Review Act.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Padilla, Schiff Urge Interior Department to Halt Further Workforce Cuts at Bureau of Reclamation

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Alex Padilla (D-Calif.)

    Padilla, Schiff Urge Interior Department to Halt Further Workforce Cuts at Bureau of Reclamation

    Senators to DOI: “Rather than decimating the agency and its dedicated staff, Interior should work with Congress to bolster Reclamation’s workforce to meet the growing demands of extreme weather, population growth, and increasing pressures on our water supply systems.”

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — Today, U.S. Senators Alex Padilla and Adam Schiff (both D-Calif.), members of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, pushed the Department of the Interior to ensure there are no further federal workforce cuts to the Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation). The letter comes after the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) issued a memo last week requiring agency heads to submit guidance on large-scale reductions in force and their reorganization plans by March 15. Due to the chaos of the Trump Administration’s reckless cuts, Reclamation is already set to lose about 100 employees in California, which is 10 percent of its regional staff.

    Despite its tradition of operating as a lean agency, Reclamation supports and operates many critical California water management projects and delivers water to more than 31 million Americans and 10 million acres of farmland. This farmland managed by Reclamation produces over 60 percent of the nation’s vegetables and more than 25 percent of its fruits and nuts.

    “Any federal dollars ‘saved’ from a reduction in staffing will ultimately cost taxpayers more through disrupted supply chains, increased burdens on state taxpayers, and emergency response due to the instability created by these reductions,” wrote the Senators. “Aging dams, reservoirs, and conveyance systems require continuous monitoring and maintenance, and without adequate staffing, the risk of infrastructure failures increases. Such failures could have catastrophic consequences, including flooding, water contamination, and severe disruptions to California’s agricultural and urban economies.”

    “We strongly urge you to reconsider the termination of these critical Reclamation employees and halt further workforce reductions at Reclamation,” continued the Senators. “Rather than decimating the agency and its dedicated staff, Interior should work with Congress to bolster Reclamation’s workforce to meet the growing demands of extreme weather, population growth, and increasing pressures on our water supply systems.”

    Padilla and Schiff highlighted three essential water projects that depend on the expertise of Reclamation staff for managing water in the West, where water systems are extremely complex and are closely coordinated with state, tribal, and local authorities:

    • The Klamath Project provides critical water supplies to farms, wildlife refuges, and tribal communities in Oregon and California. Reclamation staff are essential to balancing competing demands for tribal cultural protection, agricultural water deliveries, and ecological health.
    • The Central Valley Project (CVP) operates in tandem with the State Water Project (SWP) to supply water to farms, businesses, and residents. The two systems are deeply interconnected, and CVP staff is essential to SWP operations and water deliveries. The CVP is a federal responsibility, and maintaining full Reclamation staffing is essential to protect California’s water supply and agricultural economy.
    • The Lower Colorado Regional Office operates Hoover Dam — one of the federal government’s most critical infrastructure assets. Its staff provide real-time data and operational oversight that is vital for Colorado River management, and for ensuring reliable water deliveries to three Western states, millions of people, and some of the nation’s most productive farmland.

    The Senators also highlighted concerns from many California water contractors who have warned Interior Secretary Burgum against eliminating essential Reclamation staff with the knowledge necessary to safely and reliably deliver water throughout California. Many of these contractors have emphasized that Reclamation is a service organization, not funded by taxpayers but rather water and power customers.

    Last week, Senators Padilla and Schiff urged the Department of the Interior to immediately stop its freeze of Inflation Reduction Act funding for the Lower Colorado River System Conservation and Efficiency Program, which is managed by the Bureau of Reclamation.

    Full text of the letter is available here and below:

    Dear Secretary Burgum, Acting Commissioner Palumbo, Director Stock, and Director Johnson:

    We write to express serious concerns regarding (i) alleged staff terminations at the Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) in California and (ii) the recent Office of Personnel Management (OPM) memo calling for significant federal workforce reductions. On March 3, 2025, it was reported that Reclamation is set to lose about 100 employees in California, which is 10 percent of its regional staff. In the strongest terms, we ask that you provide further information and justification about these reductions and ensure that any additional cuts at the Department of the Interior (Interior) do not further impact Reclamation, an already lean agency that delivers water to more than 31 million Americans and 10 million acres of farmland that produce 60% of the nation’s vegetables and 25% of its fruits and nuts.

    Reclamation staff are indispensable to managing water in the West, where water systems are highly technical, complex, and closely coordinated with state, tribal, and local authorities. For example:

    The Klamath Project provides critical water supplies to farms, wildlife refuges, and tribal communities in Oregon and California. Reclamation staff are essential to balancing competing demands for Tribal cultural protection, agricultural water deliveries, and ecological health.

    The Central Valley Project (CVP) operates in tandem with the State Water Project (SWP) to supply water to farms, businesses, and residents. The two systems are deeply interconnected, making CVP staffing essential to SWP operations and water deliveries. As the CVP is a federal responsibility, Interior must ensure it remains fully staffed to protect California’s water supply and agricultural economy.

    The Lower Colorado Regional Office operates Hoover Dam – one of the federal government’s most critical infrastructure assets. Its staff provide real-time data and operational oversight essential for managing the Colorado River, ensuring reliable water deliveries to three western states, millions of people, and some of the nation’s most productive farmland.

    As a large coalition of California federal water contractors wrote to you in the attached letter, “In our experience, the vast majority of staff throughout Reclamation’s California-Great Basin region is comprised of dedicated, talented federal employees, possessing specialized skills, knowledge, and the relevant and specific experience necessary to safely and efficiently manage, operate and maintain one of the largest, most complex water projects in the world… This knowledge is absolutely essential to assuring the continued safe and reliable delivery of water throughout the state.” The staffing cuts previously made by and deferred resignations conducted through this Administration have already led to the loss of many experienced employees. As the water contractors point out, additional losses will threaten public health and safety and negatively impact the water delivery system for the nation’s largest state economy.

    Any federal dollars “saved” from a reduction in staffing will ultimately cost taxpayers more through disrupted supply chains, increased burdens on state taxpayers, and emergency response due to the instability created by these reductions. Aging dams, reservoirs, and conveyance systems require continuous monitoring and maintenance, and without adequate staffing, the risk of infrastructure failures increases. Such failures could have catastrophic consequences, including flooding, water contamination, and severe disruptions to California’s agricultural and urban economies.

    In light of these challenges, please answer the following questions by March 13, 2025.

    1. What analyses, if any, have been completed to determine the budgetary and broader economic impacts of losing Reclamation employees that have already been or will be lost?

    2. How does Interior plan to make up for the current and anticipated loss of specialized knowledge about California’s water systems, including the CVP, given these terminations?

    3. How will Interior and Reclamation continue to manage, operate, and maintain California’s aging infrastructure in light of these staffing losses?

    4. According to OPM’s FedScope, there were 5,739 employees at Reclamation as of September 2024. How many Reclamation employees are there as of March 6, 2025?

    5. What are the job functions and employment locations of Reclamation employees in California who have been terminated and accepted deferred resignation?

    6. Please describe in detail, the degree to which Mr. Elon Musk and/or representatives from the “Department of Government Efficiency” or “United States DOGE Service” have been involved in any part of these firings within Interior and Reclamation.

    We strongly urge you to reconsider the termination of these critical Reclamation employees and halt further workforce reductions at Reclamation. Rather than decimating the agency and its dedicated staff, Interior should work with Congress to bolster Reclamation’s workforce to meet the growing demands of extreme weather, population growth, and increasing pressures on our water supply systems.

    We welcome the opportunity to further discuss these concerns and would be happy to host you for a visit at any time to give you a tour of California’s vital water infrastructure and introduce you to the outstanding Reclamation staff in California.

    Sincerely,

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: SCHUMER SAYS: HANDS OFF SOUTHERN TIER SENIORS’ & FAMILIES’ SOCIAL SECURITY; SENATOR DEMANDS ANSWERS ON POTENTIAL CLOSURE OF CHEMUNG COUNTY SOCIAL SECURITY OFFICE

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for New York Charles E Schumer
    Big Flats Social Security Office Is Only Office In Chemung County, And It Was Just Listed On ‘DOGE’s Wall Of Receipts For Chopping Block, Senator Says Staff & Thousands Of Southern Tier Seniors & Families Who Rely On Office To Help With Social Security Checks Need Answers Now
    Senator Says Taking Away The Only In-Person Social Security Office For Miles Would Hurt Our Seniors And Others Who Need In Person Services, And Will Make It More Difficult For New Yorkers To Access Their Hard-Earned Social Security Benefits
    Schumer: Closing Big Flats Social Security Office Will Hurt Southern Tier Seniors And Families – So Don’t Do It!
    After ‘DOGE’ placed the Big Flats Social Security Administration office on a list of leases to be terminated, U.S. Senator Chuck Schumer today demanded answers for the thousands of Southern Tier seniors and families who rely on this office for their hard-earned Social Security checks and administrative assistance. This comes as the new administration has proposed massive cuts —more than 7,000 people— in the Social Security Administration across the country, which would radically diminish service, responsiveness and timeliness of benefit delivery and processing.
    “The Big Flats Social Security office is the only location in Chemung County, and with no clarity about the future of the office’s over a dozen employees or assurances about continuity of operations for the Southern Tier local residents deserve answers and – above all – they deserve an open office that continues to provide vital in-person services,” said Schumer.
    “Social Security allows seniors in New York and across the country to retire in dignity and provides vital support for those who become disabled, and tens of millions of seniors, families, and children depend on these hard-earned benefits. Closing the Big Flats Social Security office could result in untenable reductions in local staff, and will make it harder for New Yorkers to get the benefits they are owed and deserve,” said Senator Schumer. “Social Security is a lifeline and we can’t have it cut. That’s why I’m demanding answers on why this office was listed for closure and to ensure Southern Tier residents can access their hard-earned Social Security benefits uninterrupted.”
    “The potential closure of our local Social Security office would have a significant impact on Chemung County’s older and most vulnerable adults, many of whom rely on in-person services and have limited access to transportation,” said Chemung County Dept. of Aging & Long Term Care Director Beth Stranges. “This decision would create unnecessary barriers, increasing the already lengthy wait times and reducing access to the vital resources that our most vulnerable residents, which include our friends, neighbors, parents, grandparents, and many children, depend on. We must continue to advocate to keep access to these essential services within our county to ensure all older adults receive the access to support they need without added hardship.”
    “The lack of information from this Administration on the closing of the Big Flats Office is frightening. Our employees show up to work each day looking to help their community and provide these much-needed services, now they have been left in the dark,” said Shawn Halloran AFGE Local President 3342. “Closing this office can have devasting impacts on the workforce and the ability to provide assistance to local residents. This entire situation has been cruel and stressful.”
    Schumer said this follows the alarming pattern of abrupt SSA office closures across New York State. Last month, the White Plains office was placed on a list of office spaces for potential sale, and earlier this week, the Poughkeepsie office was placed on a similar list as well. Local Social Security offices offer a full range of Social Security services, including applying for new or replacement Social Security cards, applying for Social Security and Supplemental Security Income benefits, making changes to your benefits information and more. In rural communities like Chemung County, having local access to their hard earned benefits is crucial for Southern Tier seniors and their families.
    Social Security has been a crucial piece of the social safety net since President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed the law creating it in 1935, and it was designed to be self-sufficient. It has a dedicated revenue source from payroll taxes, which workers split with their employers. In a letter to Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration LeLand Dudek, Schumer demanded answers about the sudden closures across New York State and the future of the SSA office in Big Flats. Schumer expressed concerns that these sudden closures mean tens of millions of Americans who depend on Social Security could be in serious trouble.
    Amid Elon Musk’s comments that Social Security is a scam and a “ponzi scheme,” Schumer warned that Americans’ social security payments are under attack by ’ Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency. DOGE’s online “wall of receipts” lists office leases that it plans to cancel, including Social Security Administration offices in New York. This is the second federal office in the Southern Tier affected after job cuts were issued by DOGE at the Bath Veterans Affairs facility.
    Schumer’s letter to Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration LeLand Dudek below:
    Dear Acting Commissioner Dudek,
    I write with deep concerns about the potential closure of the Social Security Administration office in Big Flats, NY. Social Security offices in New York and across the country are essential to ensuring that Americans can access their hard-earned benefits. The Big Flats office is the only office in Chemung County and serves New Yorkers across New York’s Southern Tier, and its closure will make it more difficult for New Yorkers to access the benefits they have earned and depend on.
    People in New York and across the country depend on local Social Security offices. Social Security field offices offer a full range of Social Security services, including applying for new or replacement Social Security cards, applying for Social Security and Supplemental Security Income benefits, making changes to benefits information and more. 
    Your plans for the future of the Big Flats Social Security office remain unclear, jeopardizing the payments for New Yorkers across the Southern Tier. The office was placed on a list of leased offices that will no longer have leases renewed. There has been no communication from ‘DOGE’ about how New Yorkers can receive help with their Social Security benefits if this office closes.
    I am also concerned about the office’s 14 staff members. They deserve clarity about the future of their work and where they should go if this building is sold.
    In an effort to cut through this chaos and get answers for New Yorkers, I seek answers on the following:
    What factors led to the Big Flats Social Security office’s placement on this list of properties not to have leases reviewed?
    Who is making the decisions on this lease, and what involvement does DOGE have in that process?
    Where should this office’s 14 employees report to work if this building is sold?
    Is there an alternative plan for this office’s operations to ensure New Yorkers across the Southern Tier can access Social Security services?
    Tens of millions of seniors, families, and children depend on hard-earned Social Security benefits. Closing the Big Flats office will make it more difficult for New Yorkers across the Southern Tier to access their hard-earned Social Security benefits, and that is unacceptable.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: SCHUMER DEMANDS ANSWERS & THAT ALBANY FED BUILDING REMAIN OPEN: AFTER BEING LISTED BY GSA FOR SALE AMID ‘DOGE’ CUTS, SENATOR SAYS WE NEED ANSWERS & ASSURANCES THAT VITAL SERVICES AND FED OFFICES WILL…

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for New York Charles E Schumer
    This Week GSA Listed The Leo W. O’Brien Federal Building In Albany And 400+ Other Fed Properties As ‘Designated For Disposal,’ But Mysteriously Removed List On That Same Day – Creating Confusion & Concern Building Could Close And Services Could Get Cut For Capital Region
    O’Brien Building Hosts Offices For Social Security, IRS, Military Processing And Its Presence Has Been Essential To Providing Federal Services To Albany Area For Over 50 Years
    Schumer: Capital Region Families, Seniors Can’t Have Fed Building Close And Services Cut Off, We Need Answers & Clarity ASAP
    After the Trump administration placed the Leo W. O’Brien Federal Building on a list of federal properties “designated for disposal” and abruptly removed that list, U.S. Senator Chuck Schumer today demanded answers from the General Services Administration (GSA) and assurances that the building will remain open and services uninterrupted for Capital Region residents. Schumer said the building is critical to the Capital Region and that seniors, workers, and families that rely on services in the building need clarity on future plans for this vital hub for services. 
    “This week, Albany’s O’Brien Federal Building was placed on GSA’s list of federal properties for sale and within a day, that list disappeared, creating confusion, concern, and chaos. Now many are worried this could mean the building will close and services, including a Social Security office, will be interrupted for thousands of Capital Region families, workers and seniors. GSA won’t say what its plans are and ‘DOGE’ is being dodgey about whether this Albany building is next on their chaotic chopping block. This building is where Capital Region families and seniors get help with Social Security checks, where military recruits get processed, where people go with questions on the status of their tax returns, and thousands have gotten help with other vital federal services for 50 years,”  said Senator Schumer. “My constituents in the Capital Region deserve to know what caused this chaos and who is making these decisions. They deserve certainty on the future of this building and the vital services it hosts. I am all for cutting waste and making government more efficient, but selling a property for nickels only to have taxpayers pay significantly more to lease and maintain access to these services just isn’t smart business. It’s penny wise and pound foolish, and a giveaway to private landlords. Capital Region families and federal workers have little clarity on what the future holds and we need answers now.” 
    Albany’s Leo W. O’Brien Federal Building is home to 20 federal government agencies including the Social Security Administration office, a day care for children of federal employees, a U.S. Military Entrance Processing Station, the IRS, U.S. Bankruptcy Court, and the senator’s Capital Region office. Schumer said that since it was listed earlier this week for potential disposal, his office has been inundated with inquiries on the future of the building, whether it will be closed or sold and whether services will be cut off. Schumer said it is imperative the building remain open and services are maintained, and is now demanding answers on what happened. 
    Albany Mayor Kathy Sheehan said, “The Leo O’Brien Building is a hub of vital federal government services, and our residents must have access to these services and the ability to interact with federal agencies — particularly in one of the most underserved census tracts in the entire region. I commend Senator Schumer for demanding answers of this administration and for calling out yet another example of the mismanagement and chaos carried out by DOGE.”
    This would not be the first instance of offices that provide vital federal services in NY being potentially shut down by DOGE. Social Security offices in the Hudson Valley have already been listed on the DOGE “wall of receipts” which could impact services for thousands who rely on them to help with payments.
    Schumer’s letter to General Services Administration Deputy Administrator and Acting Administrator Stephen Ehikian can be found below:
    Dear Acting Administrator Ehikian,
    I write with deep concern over the Leo W. O’Brien Federal Building in Albany N.Y. appearing on a list of buildings potentially being listed for sale or closure amid cuts by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). On Tuesday, the Leo W. O’Brien Federal Building and over 400 other federal properties were placed on a list of “non-core” properties that the General Services Administration (GSA) said are “designated for disposal.” Later that same day, GSA abruptly removed this list, creating chaos and confusion for the people who work in these buildings. The people of the Capital Region and I need answers on your plans for this building, assurances that it will remain open and that the critical services it hosts will continue uninterrupted for the thousands of New Yorkers who rely on them. 
    The Leo W. O’Brien Federal Building is home to 20 federal government agencies including the Social Security Administration office, a day care for children of federal employees, a U.S. Military Entrance Processing Station, and my Capital Region office. For 50 years, it has been where Capital Region residents interact with the federal government for essential services like assistance with Social Security checks and the IRS or seeking justice in U.S. Bankruptcy Court. This is where new military recruits from the Capital Region are processed for service. Seeing this building on a list of properties “designated for disposal” created panic for Albany’s federal workers, who are already seeing the federal workforce slashed by DOGE. The list’s sudden removal within hours of first being posted has raised even more questions and caused even more chaos and uncertainty.
    Your plans and process for determining the future of the building remain unclear. The GSA is listing the building as a “non-core” property despite the essential services the federal agencies within the building provide on a daily basis. The public has yet to see any cost-benefit studies to justify a potential major sale like this, and many have raised serious concerns that a measure like this would end up costing taxpayers significantly more by forcing federal offices to be leased by a private landlord. To add to the concerns, removing this list with no communication about if or when the list will be re-posted or updated underscores the complete disorganization and inefficiency of a process that potentially impacts jobs and vital services for my constituents. The hard-working federal workers in this building and the communities who rely on their services in New York’s Capital Region deserve clarity and certainty.
    In an effort to cut through the confusion, I seek answers on the following:
    What factors led to the Leo W. O’Brien Federal Building’s placement on this list of properties “designated for disposal”? 
    Who is making the decisions on this lease, and what involvement does DOGE have in that process?
    Why was this list taken down so quickly? If so, will the list be updated and what criteria are being used for determining whether a property remains on an updated list?
    Why did you not follow the standard processes of seeking public input about the loss of a federal building? Please provide any and all cost-benefit analysis studies that have been done relevant to the decision-making process for this property. 
    If the building is sold, is there an alternative plan for the federal offices located in the building? What assurances can be given that existing services in the building will not be disrupted due to a sale of this property? 
    This building has been integral to the federal government’s work in the Capital Region for 50 years, and its abrupt closure and sale would disrupt essential services my constituents rely on. We should not be haphazardly selling America’s real estate portfolio and causing chaos and uncertainty for the American people. This process is everything but efficient. I ask for your prompt answers to my questions above and urge you to maintain the Leo W. O’Brien Federal Building in Albany so federal workers can continue to support and serve the Capital Region and all of New York State.
    Sincerely,

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: King: Congress’s Inability to Pass Spending Bills Harms National Security

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Maine Angus King
    WASHINGTON, D.C. — In a hearing before the Senate Armed Services Committee (SASC), U.S. Senator Angus King questioned three witnesses about the adverse impact of the Republican-led House and Senate not passing annual federal spending bills on military capability and production. During the hearing, Senator King spoke with David Berteau, the President and Chief Executive Office of the Professional Services Council; Dr. Christine Michienzi, the former Senior Technology Advisor to the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment; and Dr. John McGinn, the Executive Director of the Greg and Camille Baroni Center for Government Contracting at George Mason University’s Costello College of Business.
    The exchange comes as Congress has struggled to negotiate a federal spending law that would pass with bipartisan support and be approved by the White House. Now, with less than 10 days to avert a government shutdown, Congressional appropriators are pursuing a continuing resolution that would temporarily fund the government at the previous year’s levels — therefore not adding new policies or investments that the military needs.
    “Could we all agree that continuing resolutions absolutely are not part of the solution to this problem,” asked Senator King.
    “Franklin Roosevelt did not face a single continuing resolution in the entire buildup to World War II and the entire execution thereof,” replied Berteau.
    “I concur,” said Dr. McGinn.
    “I concur,” echoed Dr. Michienzi.
    “All of you agree with that. That is one of the difficulties we are in now. It creates all kinds of downstream in the industrial base and preparation. Thank you for that. Let the record show, continuing resolutions are not the way to do business, particularly in the defense area,” said Senator King. “All of you have mentioned something very interesting which is allies are part of the solution. It concerns me that we are embarked on a course that is not encouraging to our allies, and in some cases poking our allies in the eye. Talk to me about the importance of allies in dealing with the production necessary for significant conflict whether it is Japan, U.K., Canada, or other countries.”
    “Our allies are a key part of our industrial base. We have a number of agreements and collaborative programs. The largest fighter program in the world, the F-35, we have a dozen partner countries I believe,” responded Dr. McGinn. 
    “We cannot do this by ourselves, correct,” asked Senator King. “All of you are nodding, could you say yes? They don’t show up in the transcript.” 
    “Yes,” Berteau, Dr. Michienzi and Dr. McGinn agreed unanimously.
    A member of the Senate Armed Services Committee and the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, Senator King is recognized as an authoritative voice on national security and foreign policy issues who has also been named a “fiscal hero” by government watchdogs for responsible spending. Senator King has previously urged the Department of Defense (DoD) to take advantage of private sector technologies or risk losing access to innovative defense technologies and encouraged the (DoD) to reevaluate its acquisition process of defense technologies.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: PHOTO: Cornyn Meets Houstonian & Honorary Secret Service Agent DJ Daniel

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Texas John Cornyn

    WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator John Cornyn (R-TX) today met Houstonian and 13-year-old cancer survivor DJ Daniel, whom President Trump named an honorary Secret Service Agent during his Joint Address to Congress on Tuesday. See photo below.

    “I know I’m not alone in saying that 13-year-old Texan DJ Daniel, who proudly wore a Houston Police Department uniform… was one of the highlights of POTUS’ address to Congress. DJ is an inspiration and a great example of resilience. DJ, you are amazing, and I know you will be a fantastic Secret Service agent.” 

    This image is in the public domain, but those wishing to do so may credit the Office of U.S. Senator John Cornyn.

    Senator John Cornyn, a Republican from Texas, is a member of the Senate Finance, Judiciary, Intelligence, Foreign Relations, and Budget Committees.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Booker, Scott Reintroduce Bill to Strengthen Protections, Restore Intent of Federal Religious Freedom Law

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for New Jersey Cory Booker
    WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senator Cory Booker reintroduced the Do No Harm Act, which will restore the original intent of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), and prohibit individuals and businesses from using religion to deny others’ civil rights. Companion  legislation was reintroduced in the House by Committee on Education and Workforce Ranking Member Robert C. “Bobby” Scott (D-VA-03), Committee on the Judiciary Ranking Member Jamie Raskin (D-MD-08), Subcommittee on the Constitution and Limited Government Ranking Member Mary Gay Scanlon (D-PA-05), and Congressman Steve Cohen (D-TN-09).
    The legislation comes amid a sharp rise in the misapplication of RFRA to justify discrimination in a wide range of scenarios.
    The Trump Administration is poised to supercharge the misapplication of RFRA through executive actions. For example, on February 7, 2025, President Trump issued Executive Order 14205 titled “Establishment of the White House Faith Office” directing the White House Faith Office to support federal agencies in providing training and education on the availability of religious exemptions.
    The Do No Harm Act limits the use of RFRA in cases involving discrimination, child labor and abuse, wages and collective bargaining, access to health care, public accommodations, and social services provided through government contracts.
    “Freedom of religion is one of our country’s founding principles, but freely exercising one’s faith does not create the right to deny another person of their civil liberties,” said Senator Booker. “The Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 (RFRA) was never meant to create a loophole for discrimination. The Do No Harm Act is critical legislation that will restore the careful balance of the First Amendment and RFRA’s original intent by ensuring that religious beliefs cannot be used to deny people of their right to live free from discrimination.
    “When Congress passed the Religious Freedom Restoration Act in 1993, it was intended to protect religious exercise—not to erode civil rights under the guise of religious freedom.  Regrettably, we have seen RFRA repeatedly used to attack civil rights protections, deny access to health care, and allow discrimination in federal contracts and programs,” said Ranking Member Scott. “The Do No Harm Act simply provides that RFRA cannot be used to limit access to health care, deny services supported by taxpayer dollars, or undermine the Civil Rights Act or other anti-discrimination protections.  Congress must take this critical step to ensure no one can weaponize religious freedom to erode our fundamental civil and legal rights.”
    “Our constitutional right to worship freely is not a right to violate the civil rights of other people,” said Ranking Member Raskin.  “That’s why I’m proud to join my colleagues in introducing the Do No Harm Act, a bill which will make sure that we respect the universal free exercise of religion but that no one can turn it into a weapon against other people’s equality and freedom.”
    “The free exercise of religious beliefs is one of our country’s founding principles,” said Congresswoman Scanlon.  “But religious freedom laws are increasingly being weaponized to justify discrimination and undermine civil rights protections.  I’m proud to introduce the Do No Harm Act to restore the chronically misused Religious Freedom Restoration Act to its original intent – which is to provide protections for religious exercise while ensuring that RFRA is not used to erode civil rights under the guise of religious freedom.”
    “Civil rights grow.  We can enforce and protect one person’s rights without sacrificing another’s.  And in so doing, we can apply our laws to expand the rights of all. We don’t need to pit one group against another,” said Congressman Cohen. “The Do No Harm Act advances the original intent of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act and corrects the courts’ misguided interpretations that have allowed the religious rights of some to be used to undermine the civil rights of others.  I’m pleased to join Congressman Scott in this effort.”
    For a list of the endorsing organizations of the Do No Harm Act, click here.
    To read the full text of the bill, click here.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Booker, Warren, Senators Raise Alarm About Reports of X Officials Leveraging Elon Musk’s Government Position to Drive Ad Revenue & Enrich the Billionaire

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for New Jersey Cory Booker
    WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senators Cory Booker (D-NJ) and Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) led Senators Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), Adam Schiff (D-CA), and Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) in sending a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi, raising concerns about reports that Elon Musk’s social media company “X” (formerly Twitter) is leveraging his influential position in the Trump Administration to extract revenue from advertisers and enrich himself. If Musk uses his government position to interfere with federal antitrust enforcement, allegedly threatening to stall or block an advertiser’s merger if they do not pay up, then he risks running afoul of criminal ethics laws.
    In 2023, a wave of advertisers withdrew ads from X after Musk “endorsed an antisemitic post” and loosened content moderation rules in ways that increased inflammatory content on the platform, reportedly costing the company as much as $75 million in ad revenue that year.
    In 2024, as Musk prepared to begin his new role in the federal government, an attorney at X allegedly demanded that the advertising conglomerate Interpublic Group “get its clients to spend more on Elon Musk’s social-media platform, or else.” 
    Interpublic has reportedly interpreted these communications to mean that Musk will leverage his influence over President Trump to stall or block Interpublic’s $13 billion deal to merge with advertising competitor Omnicom Group,” weaponizing federal antitrust enforcers, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice (DOJ).
    In the first letter, the Senators raise concerns that “X officials could … be attempting to strike a quid-pro-quo deal, pressuring Interpublic to get its clients to spend a certain amount on advertising on X in exchange for directing President Trump to use his antitrust enforcement agencies to allow Interpublic’s merger with Omnicom to proceed.”
    “The fear that the FTC and DOJ could be used in such a way is not unfounded. There is precedent for the Trump Administration weaponizing federal antitrust enforcers to punish his perceived opponents. During his first term, President Trump allegedly interfered with the AT&T-Time Warner merger, in which the DOJ sued to block the merger, to punish CNN for the news agency’s reporting on the President,” wrote the Senators.
    The Senators request that the FTC and DOJ inform the undersigned of any attempts made by Elon Musk or his associates to interfere with federal antitrust enforcement writing, “The federal government’s antitrust enforcers should be prioritizing lowering costs for American consumers, empowering workers, and supporting small businesses. They should not be weaponized by wealthy business owners to put more money in the hands of billionaires or retaliate against American businesses.”
    Additionally, in a related letter sent today, the senators urge Attorney General Pam Bondi to investigate Special Government Employee Elon Musk if he uses his government position to protect those who engage in business with him as he would risk violating criminal ethics laws.  
    “Musk is not above the law by virtue of being the world’s richest man,” continued the senators. “If evidence emerges that Musk is, in fact, using his official role to coerce advertisers or is participating in particular matters in which he has a financial interest, we ask that DOJ investigate the potential violation of federal ethics laws, as the Department should for any other federal employee who appears to be breaking the law.”
    To read the full text of the letter, click here and here.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: VIDEO: Senator Peters Calls for Passage of the PRO Act to Protect American Workers’ Right to Organize

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Michigan Gary Peters
    Published: 03.06.2025
    Peters Again Cosponsored and Helped Reintroduce the Bill to Support Workers in Michigan and Across the Country

    WASHINGTON, DC – U.S. Senator Gary Peters (MI) called for passage of the Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO) Act, comprehensive legislation to protect workers’ right to stand together and bargain for higher wages, better benefits, and safer workplaces. The PRO Act, which Peters again cosponsored and helped reintroduce this Congress, would restore fairness to the economy by strengthening the federal laws that protect workers’ right to join a union freely and fairly.
    “Labor unions created the American middle class,” said Senator Peters. “The PRO Act will make it easier for folks to organize, to become a member of a union, and be able to stand up for the rights that they deserve. I come from a union household. My parents were both members of the union. I am who I am because of the love and support that they gave me, and the fact that they were part of a union allowed them to provide for my future. That’s why we’ve got to pass the PRO Act.”

    To watch the video, click here.
    The PRO Act, which Peters previously spoke in favor of on the Senate floor, would protect every American’s right to organize in their workplace and collectively bargain. The bill specifically includes measures that would:
    Hold employers accountable for violating workers’ rights by authorizing meaningful penalties, facilitating initial collective bargaining agreements, and closing loopholes that allow employers to misclassify their employees as supervisors and independent contractors.
    Empower workers to exercise their right to organize by strengthening support for workers who suffer retaliation for exercising their rights, protecting workers’ right to support secondary boycotts, ensuring workers can collect “fair share” fees, and authorizing a private right of action for violation of workers’ rights.
    Secure free, fair, and safe union elections by preventing employers from interfering in union elections, prohibiting captive audience meetings, and requiring employers to be transparent with their workers.
    Peters grew up in a union household, where his mother was a Service Employees International Union (SEIU) steward, and his father was a member of the National Education Association (NEA). During his annual motorcycle tour across Michigan last year, Peters met with local union members and retirees at IBEW Local 131 in Kalamazoo to underscore the need to protect workers’ right to collectively bargain. Peters also joined UAW members on the picket line in Michigan as they negotiated for better wages, benefits, and job security. Then, following the UAW’s historic contracts in 2024, Peters led his colleagues in sending a letter to 13 non-unionized automakers urging them not to illegally block UAW unionization efforts at their manufacturing plants. Peters invited UAW Region 1 Director LaShawn English to be his guest for the 2024 State of the Union Address last year.

    MIL OSI USA News