Category: Americas

  • MIL-OSI USA: Ernst Targets Welfare for Politicians on Presidents’ Day

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Joni Ernst (R-IA)
    WASHINGTON – As Americans celebrate Presidents’ Day, Senate DOGE Caucus Chair Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) is introducing a pair of bills to ensure that tax dollars are spent to benefit all Americans instead of Washington insiders.
    Ernst’s legislation will eliminate tax dollars for political campaigns and reduce cushy benefits for former presidents.
    “This Presidents’ Day I am fighting for the integrity of the office because the last thing we need to spend tax dollars on is more attack ads and cushy perks for politicians,” said Ernst. “There is no better way to pay down the $36 trillion debt than by defunding welfare for political campaigns. Washington should be working to benefit all Americans instead of itself.” There is currently $400 million sitting in the fund.
    The ELECT Act eliminates the Presidential Election Campaign Fund, which utilizes tax dollars to fund presidential campaigns, and uses the remaining money to pay down the national debt.
    The Presidential Allowance Modernization Act reforms the compensation package provided to former presidents by cutting perks such as office space, staff, and travel expenses while retaining presidential pensions, security, and allowances.
    Background:
    No candidate who has taken the money from the Presidential Campaign Fund has won the presidential election in the last 20 years.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI China: ‘Everything’ on table to retaliate against U.S. tariffs: Canadian trade minister

    Source: China State Council Information Office

    The Canadian government is ready to retaliate against U.S. tariffs, the nation’s trade minister told Australian media on Monday.

    Mary Ng, Canada’s minister of export promotion, international trade and economic development, said during an official visit to Australia that the U.S. government’s promised tariffs will “simply create costs for Americans.”

    U.S. President Donald Trump earlier in February agreed to pause a 25 percent tariff on all goods imported to the United States from Canada and Mexico except for energy products, which will face 10 percent tariffs, for 30 days.

    Ng told Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) television on Monday night that Canada is ready to retaliate if the tariffs are implemented.

    “Should Canada get tariffs that are punishing, tariffs that will hurt our economy, everything will be on the table,” she said. “We will respond, and we will respond with impact.”

    The Australian government has said it is working on an exemption from U.S. 25 percent tariffs on all steel and aluminum imports.

    Ng, who is in Australia leading a delegation of 140 Canadian companies aiming to boost the trade relationship between the countries, told the ABC that the two countries have not yet discussed a joint response to U.S. tariffs.

    In a separate interview with Nine Entertainment newspapers, she said that Australia and Canada should continue to promote open and free trade under a system “that is underpinned by a rules-based order.”

    Ng met with Don Farrell, Australia’s minister for trade and tourism, over the weekend.

    Farrell on Thursday rejected a claim from Peter Navarro, Trump’s senior counselor for trade and manufacturing, that aluminum imported from Australia is “killing” the U.S. market. 

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI Canada: Travellers on Air Canada Flight 66 that arrived in Vancouver on February 11, 2025, advised to monitor for measles symptoms

    Travellers on Air Canada Flight 66 that arrived in Vancouver on February 11, 2025, advised to monitor for measles symptoms
    jlutz

    Yukon Communicable Disease Control (YCDC) and the Chief Medical Officer of Health (CMOH) are advising Yukoners of a potential measles exposure linked to Air Canada Flight 66, which arrived in Vancouver on February 11, 2025, as announced by the British Columbia Centre for Disease Control (BCCDC).

    Measles is a highly contagious viral infection that can cause serious complications, particularly for infants, pregnant individuals and those with weakened immune systems. Yukoners who may have been on this flight or in contact with affected individuals are advised to monitor for symptoms and follow public health guidance. High risk groups should contact YCDC at 867-667-8323 for guidance.

    Those considered high-risk for severe illness include:

    • individuals who have never had measles disease;
    • those who have not had two doses of the measles vaccine;
    • infants under six months of age;
    • pregnant people; and
    • people with weakened immune system.

    Symptoms of measles

    Measles symptoms typically appear seven to 21 days after exposure and include:

    • fever of 38.3°C or higher;
    • cough, runny nose or red eyes; and
    • a red, blotchy rash appearing three to seven days after a fever starts.

    Individuals who develop symptoms should isolate immediately and call 811 or their health centre or YCDC before visiting any health care facility or provider.

    Prevention

    To reduce the risk of measles infection, the Government of Yukon encourages all Yukoners to:

    • stay up to date with their measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccination; and
    • check their immunization records and ensure they have received two doses of the MMR or MMR-V vaccine.

    If unsure of your immunization status or you require a vaccine, contact YCDC or your health care provider.
     

    Related information:

    Information about measles

    Measles guidelines for health professionals

    MMR and MMRV vaccines for the Yukon immunization program

    British Columbia media alert on confirmed case of measles in Lower Mainland

    MIL OSI Canada News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Cantwell Statement on Firings of FAA Employees

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Washington Maria Cantwell
    02.17.25
    Cantwell Statement on Firings of FAA Employees
    WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, Sen. Maria Cantwell, ranking member of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation and senior member of the Senate Finance Committee, released the following statement about reports that FAA safety employees who have served less than one year at the agency, including to technicians working under FAA’s Air Traffic Organization, have been fired as part of the DOGE-led federal workforce cuts:
    “Now is not the time to fire technicians who fix and operate more than 74,000 safety-critical pieces of equipment like radars, navigational aids, and communications technology,” said Sen. Cantwell. “The FAA is already short 800 technicians and these firings inject unnecessary risk into the airspace — in the aftermath of four deadly crashes in the last month. The FAA’s safety workforce needs to be a priority for this Administration.”
    Last year, when Sen. Cantwell served as chair of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, the Committee’s Aviation Subcommittee highlighted FAA’s shortage of at least 800 airway transportation systems specialists – commonly known as technicians –  during a December 2024 hearing on “Air Traffic Control Systems, Personnel, and Safety”. Dave Spero, president of the Professional Aviation Safety Specialists (PASS), the union representing FAA technicians, testified about the importance of closing the shortage and boosting this segment of the FAA workforce in order to keep FAA’s air traffic control systems and equipment safely running. According to the FAA, over 4,000 talented technicians “install, operate, maintain, and repair more than 74,000 pieces of aviation safety equipment located across all of the United States and outlying U.S. territories.”
    During her tenure as chair, Sen. Cantwell sounded the alarm about the staffing shortage of air traffic controllers, need for more FAA safety inspectors, a series of aviation incidents and near-misses on and around runways, and the midair blowout of a door plug in January 2024.
    She led the passage of the FAA Reauthorization Act, signed into law in May 2024, which boosts controller staffing, ensuring a five-year commitment to maximum hiring and training to close the current staffing gap. The law requires upgraded safety technologies – giving controllers better visibility into runway traffic – to be installed at every large and medium airport nationwide. The law also includes stricter safety standards for aircraft operators and plane manufacturers, as well as provisions to boost staffing to put more FAA safety inspectors on factory floors.
    On Feb. 6, Sen. Cantwell sent a letter to Secretary of Transportation Sean Duffy calling on him to ensure that Elon Musk stays out of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), citing Musk’s clear conflicts of interest.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI: PSE Trading Releases Third-Party Financial Report: Fund Achieves 406.79% Cumulative Return by 2024

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    George Town, Cayman Islands, Feb. 17, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Hedge fund PSE Trading has announced its latest financial report, revealing a remarkable cumulative return of 406.79% for 2024.

    At the same time, PSE Trading is collaborating with BDO, a renowned international auditing firm, to conduct a compliance audit of the fund. This partnership aims to enhance the fund’s compliance measures and professional reputation. Moving forward, PSE Trading is committed to upgrading its investment strategies and compliance audits, ensuring greater transparency for investors and a more stable investment experience.

    About PSE Trading 
    PSE Trading is a trading and investment firm specializing in the blockchain and digital asset fields, with a unique focus on Web3 technology. It excels in four key areas: VC investment, asset management, acceleration and consulting, and research and analysis. 

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Canada: Statement from Premier Pillai on the Council of the Federation Washington, D.C., mission

    Statement from Premier Pillai on the Council of the Federation Washington, D.C., mission
    jlutz

    Premier Ranj Pillai has issued the following statement:

    “Last week, alongside my fellow Premiers, I travelled to Washington, D.C., to reinforce the deep and enduring ties between Canada and the United States. As a unified voice, all 13 territorial and provincial Premiers reinforced the significance of Canada-U.S. relations and challenged harmful tariffs.

    “We met with key representatives from Congress, business leaders and policy experts to discuss Arctic security and the importance of maintaining strong trade and economic ties. The meetings included a discussion at the White House with senior officials close to President Trump, including Deputy Chief of Staff James Blair. As Premiers, we gained valuable insight into the administration’s approach and emphasized the need for cross-border cooperation – particularly in addressing the alarming rise of fentanyl, which has severely impacted the Yukon and communities in both countries.

    “To bring northern voices to the international stage, I joined Premier of the Northwest Territories R.J. Simpson and Premier of Nunavut P.J. Akeeagok in a panel discussion at the Wilson Center. We highlighted our territories’ role in Arctic security, the strategic importance of critical minerals and the need for Indigenous-led economic initiatives.

    “Building a strong, resilient economy in the Yukon remains a top priority for this government, which is why I focused discussions on how we can strengthen cross-border trade, investment and infrastructure partnerships. In addition, as part of a meeting hosted by the Canadian American Business Council, I met with business leaders to explore opportunities for increased investment in the Yukon. I then met with Alaska Senator Lisa Murkowski and House Representative Nick Begich to discuss our relations with Alaska. We talked about the importance of working together as neighbours and the impact of tariffs on both our citizens.

    “While recent trade tensions between Canada and the U.S. remain a concern, it is important that there is constructive dialogue and solutions that reinforce the mutual economic benefits of a strong partnership. Our economies are deeply interconnected and it is in our mutual interest to foster trade policies that support growth, innovation and prosperity on both sides of the border. Canada and the United States have always found ways to work through challenges and I am confident we will continue to do so.

    “Thank you to my fellow Premiers for standing united as Team Canada throughout this trip and a special thanks to Ontario Premier Doug Ford in his role as the current Council of the Federation Chair for leading these efforts.

    “Together, we are defending Canadian jobs, our economy and our way of life.”
     

    MIL OSI Canada News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Senator Collins’ Statement on Departure of Darcie N. McElwee as U.S. Attorney

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Maine Susan Collins

    Washington, D.C. – U.S. Senator Susan Collins today released the following statement in response to the announcement of the departure of Darcie N. McElwee as U.S Attorney for Maine: 

    “Darcie McElwee served her country well as U.S. Attorney for the District of Maine.  She has dedicated her career to keeping our state safe, advocating for victims of crime, and upholding the law.  I am proud of the outstanding public service of my fellow Caribou native.”

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Canada: The Haida Nation and Canada announce a first-of-its-kind agreement recognizing Aboriginal title on Haida Gwaii

    Source: Government of Canada – Prime Minister

    Today, the President of the Haida Nation, Gaagwiis Jason Alsop, the Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau, and the Minister of Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs and Minister responsible for the Canadian Northern Economic Development Agency, Gary Anandasangaree, announced the signing of the Chiix̲uujin / Chaaw K̲aawgaa “Big Tide (Low Water)” Haida Title Lands Agreement. The Agreement includes Canada’s recognition of Haida Aboriginal title to lands on Haida Gwaii and marks a significant milestone in the journey to reconciliation.

    Canada’s recognition of Haida Aboriginal title on Haida Gwaii includes the foreshore and extends to the low-water mark. The Agreement does not affect private property interests or local and municipal governments on Haida Gwaii, and it confirms the continued delivery of federal public services. The Haida-Canada Archipelago Management Board will also continue to co-operatively manage Gwaii Haanas through a transition period, during which both governments will work to reconcile jurisdictions and laws.

    The Haida Nation collectively holds inherent Haida title and rights as described in the Constitution of the Haida Nation. At a Special House of Assembly on November 24, 2024, Haida citizens voted 97 per cent in favour of the Chiix̲uujin / Chaaw K̲aawgaa “Big Tide (Low Water)” Haida Title Lands Agreement. As a result, the Agreement was signed by the Haida Nation and Canada on December 4, 2024.

    Over an estimated five-year transition period, the Haida Nation and Canada will continue to work respectfully and co-operatively on matters relating to Haida Gwaii. Both governments have agreed that this transition will be implemented in an orderly and incremental way, providing ongoing stability for all island residents and other interest holders on Haida Gwaii.

    This Agreement builds on previous reconciliation accomplishments, including the Nang K̲’uula / Nang K̲’úulaas Recognition Agreement signed by the Haida Nation, Canada, and British Columbia in 2023, as well as the Gaayhllxid / Gíihlagalgang “Rising Tide” Haida Title Lands Agreement signed by the Haida Nation and British Columbia in April 2024.

    The Chiix̲uujin / Chaaw K̲aawgaa “Big Tide (Low Water)” Haida Title Lands Agreement is a concrete demonstration of Canada’s commitment to implementing and advancing the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Canada’s recognition of Haida Aboriginal title results from Gud ad T’alang HlG̲ang.gulx̲a Tll Yahda / Tll yá’adee G̲ii gud ahl t’álang hlG̲ángulaang (“People Working Together to Make it Right”) – and, in this way, upholds the duty and honour of the Crown based on a principled and respectful nation-to-nation relationship.

    Quotes

    “The recognition of Haida title to Haida Gwaii by Canada acknowledges historic injustices and illustrates the transformative possibilities of working together for what is right. It takes leadership to recognize a wrong, begin the process of healing from a troubled history, and trust in the ability to forge a new relationship based on respect. This recognition of title by Canada – which was initiated in 1913 by our past leaders – means that we can begin a new era of peaceful co-existence knowing that we can look after Haida Gwaii and ensure the well-being of all who call these shining islands home.”

    “I congratulate the Haida Nation for their leadership on this landmark agreement. As we mark a new chapter in the history of our nation-to-nation relationship, let us also recommit to walking the path of reconciliation. Because by working together, we’re showing that meaningful progress is possible.”

    “This landmark agreement is the first of its kind in Canada. It stands as a testament to the Haida Nation’s incredible leadership and determination to reclaim what has been rightfully theirs for generations. By recognizing Aboriginal title and rights, we showcase the progress possible when Indigenous, federal, provincial, and territorial governments work together to create a just and meaningful path to reconciliation that honours the unique interests of each nation. It is my hope that this agreement sets the stage for many others and inspires young Indigenous people that reconciliation is more than words and change is possible.”

    “The signing of the Chiix̲uujin / Chaaw K̲aawgaa “Big Tide (Low Water)” Haida Title Lands Agreement is a testament to respect, responsibility, and interconnectedness between the Council of the Haida Nation and the Government of Canada. For over 30 years, the Haida Nation and Canada – through Parks Canada – have worked side by side to protect Gwaii Haanas, a place of global significance. Today’s celebration marks another step in this journey, strengthening our partnership and honouring the inherent Haida title to the beautiful lands of Haida Gwaii.”

    “Canada is an important partner in this historic reconciliation work, and I am grateful that they have now also worked alongside the Haida Nation on an agreement that recognizes Haida Aboriginal title. The provincial Gaayhllxid / Gíihlagalgang “Rising Tide” Haida Title Lands Agreement and federal Chiix̲uujin / Chaaw K̲aawgaa “Big Tide (Low Water)” Haida Title Lands Agreement work together to recognize Aboriginal title for the Haida – a profound and historic shift in our relationship. They also provide stability for all islanders on Haida Gwaii with respect to the pathway forward. This is the next step on our shared journey and the way toward a new future in Haida Gwaii.”

    Quick Facts

    • The Council of the Haida Nation (CHN) was formed as a national government in 1974, and the Constitution of the Haida Nation was formally adopted in 2003. The Constitution mandates the CHN to conduct the external affairs and steward the lands and waters of Haida Gwaii on behalf of the Haida Nation, ensuring that the Haida relationship with Haida Gwaii continues in perpetuity.
    • Haida Gwaii is located approximately 100 kilometres west of the northern coast of mainland British Columbia. It is a group of over 200 islands totalling approximately one million hectares.
    • The Haida have been on Haida Gwaii for millennia.
    • In 2021, Canada, the Haida Nation, and British Columbia signed the GayG̲ahlda / Kwah.hlahl.dáyaa “Changing Tide” Framework for Reconciliation, setting out an incremental approach to negotiating reconciliation agreements. The Nang K̲’uula / Nang K̲’úulaas Recognition Agreement is the first tripartite agreement reached under this renewed process of negotiations.
    • Through the Nang K̲’uula / Nang K̲’úulaas Recognition Agreement, Canada and British Columbia recognized the Haida Nation as the holder of inherent rights of governance and self-determination, and the CHN as the governing body of the Haida Nation.
    • On November 7, 2024, Bill S-16, An Act respecting the recognition of the Haida Nation and the Council of the Haida Nation, received royal assent.

    Associated Links

    MIL OSI Canada News

  • MIL-OSI USA: NAPLEX Scores Released: UConn Pharmacy Students Exceed National Average

    Source: US State of Connecticut

    This time of year marks an important period for UConn’s School of Pharmacy as they reflect on the NAPLEX passing rates – an indicator of areas of strength and improvement for the School in preparing their students for success on this licensure exam.  

    Pharmacy nationwide, including those at UConn, choose to take this exam typically in the summer after they graduate with their Pharm.D. degrees. Students take this exam to become licensed pharmacists, opening up opportunities in various settings, including hospitals, pharmaceutical companies, research centers, and more. At the start of the new year, the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE) publishes a report based on the data from the previous summer’s NAPLEX scores, with the first-time pass rate being the most important metric.  

    At UConn’s School of Pharmacy, preparation is a priority since many graduates choose to take the NAPLEX. During their final year in the pharmacy program and their last year as Huskies, students go through NAPLEX preparation. As part of UConn’s curriculum, this preparation includes exercises where students identify their strengths and weaknesses in content areas, formulate study plans, and refine their test-taking skills in professional development courses. Because the NAPLEX exam takes several hours to complete and consists of two hundred questions, UConn students utilize many resources during their preparation to succeed.  

    The School believes that one of our responsibilities to the students in our program is to prepare them for the NAPLEX exam as best as possible. –  Diana Sobieraj, Director of Assessment and Associate Professor

    For the past four years, the NAPLEX has operated under the same content outline. Since 2022, UConn Pharmacy students have improved their pass rates. In 2024, UConn Pharmacy reached its highest pass rate under the current content outline, with a pass rate of 84% compared to the national average of 78%, outperforming pharmacy students across the nation. 

    Striving for their students’ success, UConn Pharmacy has recently undergone a curricular revision of required didactic courses, which will be implemented in the fall of 2025. This revision will include a specific curriculum aimed at improving students’ skills and abilities that will directly translate to certain areas of the NAPLEX exam. 

    Looking forward, UConn Pharmacy continues to transform its curriculum to better prepare students for success on the NAPLEX exam and in their professional lives beyond their time at the School. 

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Waller, Disinflation Progress Uneven but Still on Track Rates Cuts on Track as Well

    Source: US State of New York Federal Reserve

    Thank you, Bruce, and thank you for the opportunity to speak to you today. It’s great being back in Sydney and seeing old friends—like the Opera House!
    As I look at the U.S. economy today, I see that the real side is doing just fine but progress on lowering inflation has come in fits and starts.1 After two good months of inflation data for November and December, January once again disappointed and showed that progress on inflation remains uneven. I continue to believe that the current setting of monetary policy is restricting economic activity somewhat and putting downward pressure on inflation. If this winter-time lull in progress is temporary, as it was last year, then further policy easing will be appropriate. But until that is clear, I favor holding the policy rate steady.
    Spending by households and businesses has proved to be resilient, we have solid growth in real gross domestic product (GDP) and the latest data on employment, including revisions to most of 2024, support the view that labor market is in a sweet spot. Meanwhile, last week’s January inflation data have a similar feel to that of January 2024, albeit to a smaller degree; they surprised on the high side and raised concerns that the progress we made in pushing inflation toward our 2 percent goal would stall out. But once we got past the first quarter of last year, we did see continued progress in reducing inflation in the latter part of the year. The question now is if we will see progress again later this year, as we did in 2024.
    Progress on inflation is an important consideration in policymakers’ judgment about whether monetary policy needs adjustment in the near term. The continued solid labor market is one reason why I supported the Federal Open Market Committee’s (FOMC) decision at the end of January to hold our policy rate steady. After two good inflation reports for November and December there was concern about a January bounce back in inflation. So based on good labor market data and concerns about a seasonal shock to inflation not fully adjusted in the data, I felt it was prudent to stand pat at our January meeting. Given last week’s inflation report, that concern was warranted.
    Let me pause here for a moment to address some commentary after the FOMC meeting that cited uncertainty about the new Administration’s policies as a leading reason for that decision. We must keep in mind that there is always a degree of uncertainty about economic policy, and we need to act based on incoming data even when facing great uncertainty about the economic landscape. We have done this in the past and will continue to do so in the future.
    Let me provide two recent examples where the FOMC acted in the face of great uncertainty. In March 2022, inflation was roaring, and rate hikes were on the table. Then Russia invaded Ukraine, which created tremendous economic uncertainty around the globe. Not only did the FOMC raise the policy rate in March 2022 for the first time since 2019, but in subsequent meetings we also implemented large rate hikes for several meetings. We could not wait for uncertainty about the war to be resolved.
    The second episode was in March of 2023 when stresses emerged in the U.S. banking system, stemming in part from the failures of Silicon Valley Bank and Credit Suisse, with the latter occurring the weekend before our March FOMC meeting. There was great uncertainty as to whether these events would lead to financial instability and a significant contraction of credit that could trigger a recession. Many forecasters projected a recession would hit in the second half of 2023 as a result. Consequently, there were calls to stop hiking the policy rate due to a tremendous amount of financial and banking uncertainty. But the Federal Reserve worked in concert with other government agencies and used its financial stabilization tools to deal with the banking issues and continued raising the policy rate to deal with inflation.2 So the moral of this story is that monetary policy cannot be put on hold waiting for these types of uncertainty to resolve.
    Putting uncertainty aside, let me turn to my view of the economic data. As I noted, real GDP continued to grow solidly in the fourth quarter, at a pace of 2.3 percent, and would have been nearly 1 percentage point stronger without a reduction in inventories, which tend to be volatile. Personal consumption expenditures (PCE), which are typically two-thirds of GDP, grew a robust 4.2 percent in the fourth quarter. As was noted in the Fed’s latest Monetary Policy Report to Congress, households have a solid level of liquid assets to sustain their spending. Based on the limited data we have for the first quarter of 2025 this solid growth seems to be continuing. The employment report for January, which I will focus on in a moment, indicated a continued strong labor market, which should support consumption. Retail sales are reported to have fallen back in January after a strong rise in December, but given how volatile these data can be, and given that the cold weather in January probably held down sales, I’m not putting much weight on that reading for the time being. Business sentiment, as reflected in surveys of purchasing managers in both manufacturing and non-manufacturing, was among the most consistently positive in a while. The index for manufacturing businesses was 50.9, the first time since October 2022 that these results topped 50, as sentiment indicators about orders, production, and employment were all expanding. The corresponding index for the large majority of businesses outside manufacturing also indicated expansion, as it has for some time. The Blue Chip consensus of private forecasters and the Atlanta Fed’s GDP Now forecast based on the data in hand predict growth this quarter similar to that of the end of last year. To circle back to my message earlier, many people predicted that tariffs proposed by the Administration on February 1 would have a significant effect on trade and consumption in the first quarter, not to mention prices, but after the postponement of some of those tariffs, it is unclear to me if and when that might show up in the data. I will, of course, be watching closely, but I haven’t altered my outlook based on what has been implemented to date.
    As I noted earlier, data on the labor market indicate that it is in a good spot, with employers having an easier time filling jobs than earlier in the expansion but with still ample demand for new workers and new jobs being created. The unemployment rate ticked down to 4 percent, which is just about where it has been for the past year. Employers added a net 143,000 jobs in January, down some from a 204,000 average for the final three months of 2024 but right around the 133,000 average for the quarter before that. Two factors that may have held down this number a bit were cold weather and the fires in Los Angeles, which prevented thousands of people from getting to or performing their jobs. Beyond payrolls, the ratio of job vacancies to the number of unemployed people stands at 1.1, close to the level before the pandemic.
    Wage growth continues to be strong, and it has considerably outpaced price increases, but is down from two years ago, and for a few reasons, I don’t judge recent data as indicating that wages are a factor preventing inflation from making continued progress toward 2 percent. Though the January reading of average hourly earnings was a bit elevated, this series is pretty volatile and the reading may have been held up by weather-related issues. Smoothing through the monthly fluctuations, we see wage growth fairly steady at 4 percent a month over the past year. Broader measures of worker compensation show a more distinct moderation in growth. The Labor Department’s employment cost index has fallen gradually but consistently from 4.2 percent at the end of 2023 to 3.8 percent at its last reading.
    As for whether 4 percent wage growth is consistent with 2 percent inflation, I will note, as I have before, that productivity has grown at roughly a 2 percent annual rate since the advent of the pandemic—and slightly faster than that in 2023 and 2024. Unless that productivity trend changes a lot, wage growth is consistent with bringing inflation down to 2 percent.
    Turning to inflation, last week’s data taken as a whole were mildly disappointing but not nearly so disappointing as a focus on the consumer price index (CPI) alone would have indicated. Total CPI inflation for January came in hot at 0.5 percent, and core was 0.4 percent, which brings the 12-month changes to 3.0 percent and 3.3 percent, respectively. These 12-month readings are lower than we had in January 2024, so we have made some progress over the past year, but they are still too high.
    However, we also received producer price data last week, and, combining that information with the CPI data, forecasts for January PCE inflation aren’t as alarming as the CPI inflation data. Estimates for total PCE inflation, the FOMC’s preferred measure, are about 0.3 percent and that for core PCE inflation was around 0.25 percent. These numbers will mean a bump-up in the monthly pace of core inflation of about one-tenth of 1 percentage point from readings of under 0.2 percent in November and December. And this would leave the 12-month and 6-month average core PCE inflation around 2.6 percent and 2.4 percent, respectively. These rates are lower than where they stood in January 2024, which is good, but progress has been slower than I expected on reducing inflation to our 2 percent target.
    As a policymaker, I rely on these data to help me judge how close we are to meeting our inflation target. And I’m thinking hard about how to interpret these recent numbers because there seems to be some pattern over the past few years of higher inflation readings at the start of the year. This pattern brings into question whether the inflation data have “residual seasonality,” which means that statisticians have not fully corrected for some apparent seasonal fluctuations in some prices. Many firms reset their prices at the beginning of each year, and the Commerce Department tries to factor this in, but even after this adjustment, there is a consensus among economists that some seasonality remains. Incidentally, this probably isn’t just a problem in January. Some recently updated research by the Fed staff shows that inflation in the first months of the year has been higher than in the second half for 16 of the last 22 years.3 I’m alert to this issue and will watch the data over the next few months to evaluate if we are having what looks like a repeat of high first quarter inflation data that could be followed by lower readings later in the year.
    Before I get to my outlook for monetary policy, I want to address a topic of some debate recently, which is the divergence between long-term interest rates and the FOMC’s policy rate since we started cutting rates in September. While the FOMC has reduced the policy rate 100 basis points since then, yields on the benchmark 10-year Treasury security have increased by a noticeable amount. In theory, longer-term rates should follow the expected path of the overnight policy rate set by the FOMC. But this relationship is based on the classic economic assumption of ceteris paribus, or “all other factors remaining constant.” The 10-year Treasury security trades in a deep, liquid global market, and its yield is affected by a variety of factors other than the path of the policy rate. This means that all other factors are not constant and that the 10-year Treasury yield may not follow the federal funds rate.
    Perhaps the most famous example of the divergence of market interest rates and policy rates began in the mid 2000’s. The FOMC was tightening monetary policy from 2004 to 2006 and raised the policy rate 425 basis points. Over that time, Treasury yields barely moved. This was so surprising that Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan referred to it as a “conundrum.” At about the same time, future Chair Ben Bernanke identified what he called a “global savings glut” that was pushing up foreign demand for Treasury securities and putting downward pressure on yields. Over time, this has come to be seen as a significant factor for the conundrum then and as a factor for low Treasury yields subsequently. This example is just to illustrate that the 10-year Treasury yield may not respond to the policy rate as expected because of a variety of factors that are beyond the control of the FOMC.
    So, what does my economic outlook mean for monetary policy? The labor market is balanced and remarkably resilient. If you want an example of a stable labor market with employment at its maximum level, it looks a lot like where we are right now. On the other side of the FOMC’s mandate, inflation is still meaningfully above our target, and progress has been excruciatingly slow over the last year. This tells me that we should currently have a restrictive setting of policy, as we do—to continue to move inflation down to our goal—but that setting should be getting closer to neutral as inflation moves closer to 2 percent and should allow the labor market to remain in a good place.
    So for now, I believe a pause in rate cuts is appropriate. Assuming the labor market continues to be in rough balance, I can wait and see if the higher inflation readings in January moderate, as they have in the past couple of years. If so, I’ll have to decide if this reflects residual seasonality that will go away later in the year and if the underlying trend in inflation is toward 2 percent, or if there is a different issue holding up inflation and how that may play out. Whichever case it may be, the data are not supporting a reduction in the policy rate at this time. But if 2025 plays out like 2024, rate cuts would be appropriate at some point this year.
    And while we are waiting on data to understand how the economy is moving relative to our objectives, we will learn more about Administration policies. My baseline view is that any imposition of tariffs will only modestly increase prices and in a non-persistent manner. So I favor looking through these effects when setting monetary policy to the best of our ability. Of course, I concede that the effects of tariffs could be larger than I anticipate, depending on how large they are and how they are implemented. But we also need to remember that it is possible that other policies under discussion could have positive supply effects and put downward pressure on inflation. At the end of the day, the data should be guiding our policy action—not speculation about what could happen. And if the incoming data supports further rate cuts or staying on pause, then we should do so regardless of how much clarity we have on what policies the Administration adopts. Waiting for economic uncertainty to dissipate is a recipe for policy paralysis.

    1. The views expressed here are my own and are not necessarily those of my colleagues on the Federal Reserve Board or the Federal Open Market Committee. Return to text
    2. See my March 2022 speech for a discussion of how the Federal Reserve oversees financial stability and macroeconomic stability using different tools. Speech by Governor Waller on the economic outlook – Federal Reserve Board. Return to text
    3. For a fuller discussion of residual seasonality in inflation data, see Ekaterina Peneva and Nadia Sadée (2019), “Residual Seasonality in Core Consumer Price Inflation: An Update,” FEDS Notes (Washington: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 12). Return to text

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Cramer, Klobuchar Introduce Legislation to Support Adoptive Children, Families

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Kevin Cramer (R-ND)
    Click here for audio.
    WASHINGTON, D.C. – In Fiscal Year 2022, over 100,000 children were awaiting adoption. To better support adoptive children and families, Congressional Coalition on Adoption co-chairs U.S. Senators Kevin Cramer (R-ND) and Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) introduced two pieces of legislation.
    Pre- and post-adoption services are essential to supporting adoptive families, and the Supporting Adopted Children and Families Act (SACFA) enhances pre- and post-adoption support services by expanding eligible uses of federal adoption funding. 
    The Safe Home Act defines and provides federal resources to spread awareness of the practice of unregulated custody transfers (UCTs), also referred to as rehoming, in which the child is given to a caregiver who does not have legal custody.
    “Giving a child a stable home through adoption is one of the greatest joys for a parent, and I can attest to it,” said Cramer. “Our bills ensure children are not neglected and families have the support services they need throughout the adoption process.”
    “We’re grateful for the dedication and commitment of adoptive families who open their homes and hearts to children,” said Klobuchar. “As co-chair of the Congressional Coalition on Adoption, I will continue to work with Senator Cramer and colleagues on both sides of the aisle to ensure every child has a safe, stable, and loving home.”
    Click here for bill text.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Klobuchar, Cramer Introduce Bipartisan Legislation to Support Adoptive Families and Protect Adopted Children

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn)

    WASHINGTON — U.S. Senators Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) and Kevin Cramer (R-ND), Senate co-chairs of the bipartisan Congressional Coalition on Adoption, introduced two pieces of bipartisan legislation, the Supporting Adopted Children and Families Act and the Safe Home Act.

    “We’re grateful for the dedication and commitment of adoptive families who open their homes and hearts to children,” said Klobuchar. “As co-chair of the Congressional Coalition on Adoption, I will continue to work with Senator Cramer and colleagues on both sides of the aisle to ensure every child has a safe, loving, and permanent family.”

    “Giving a child a stable home through adoption is one of the greatest joys for a parent, and I can attest to it,” said Cramer. “Our bills ensure children are not neglected and families have the support services they need throughout the adoption process.”

    The Supporting Adopted Children and Families Act supports adoptive families with pre- and post-adoption resources, including mental health treatment. This legislation will promote:

    • Training and counseling on behavioral issues, including issues relating to emotional, behavioral, or developmental health needs;
    • Peer-to-peer mentoring and support groups that permit a new adoptive parent to communicate and learn from more experienced adoptive parents, including programs that enhance communication between adoptive parents with children of similar geographic, ethnic, or cultural backgrounds;
    • Treatment services specialized for adopted children, including psychiatric residential services, outpatient mental health services, social skills training, intensive in-home supervision services, recreational therapy, suicide prevention, and substance abuse treatment; and
    • Crisis and family preservation services, including crisis counseling and a 24-hour emergency hotline for adoptive parents.

    The Safe Home Act protects a parent’s ability to place their children with a trusted relative when appropriate but ensures they cannot transfer custody to a stranger without the oversight of the child welfare system. The bill directs the Department of Health and Human Services to provide states with guidance on preventing, identifying, and responding to unregulated custody transfers (UCTs). UCTs occur when parents transfer custody of their adopted children outside of the child welfare system — without background checks, home studies, and supervision — increasing the likelihood that the child will experience neglect, exploitation, or abuse. The bill defines UCTs as the placement of a child:

    • With someone other than a child’s adult relative, family friend, or member of the child’s Indian tribe; 
    • With the intent of severing the existing parent-child relationship;
    • Without ensuring the safety and permanency of the placement; and 
    • Without transferring parental rights and responsibilities under the law.

    The Safe Home Act also requires the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), in consultation with the State Department, to issue a report to Congress on UCT and guidance to states on preventing, identifying, and responding to these cases. 

    Klobuchar and Cramer serve as co-chairs of the Congressional Coalition on Adoption (CCA), the largest bipartisan, bicameral caucus in Congress. CCA brings together members of Congress from both parties who share the goal of ensuring all children know the love and support of a family through adoption, guardianship, and kinship care. Representatives Robert Aderholt (R-AL) and Danny K. Davis (D-IL) serve as the caucus’s House co-chairs.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: ALLEGHENY COUNTY – Governor Shapiro and Lt. Governor Davis Host Roundtable Highlighting Proposed Investments in Child Care

    Source: US State of Pennsylvania

    February 18, 2025Pittsburgh, PA

    ADVISORY – ALLEGHENY COUNTY – Governor Shapiro and Lt. Governor Davis Host Roundtable Highlighting Proposed Investments in Child Care

    Governor Josh Shapiro and Lt. Governor Austin Davis will host a roundtable at the YMCA Child Development Center at Duquesne University to talk about the Governor’s emphasis in his 2025-26 Budget Proposal on the child care workforce and his work to make child care more affordable.

    During his first two years in office, Governor Shapiro signed into law a historic expansion of the Child and Dependent Care Enhancement Tax Credit and created a new tax credit for businesses who want to contribute to their employees’ child care costs. Those two initiatives helped make child care more affordable – and the Governor’s proposal this year would make child care more available through an investment of $55 million to support child care workforce recruitment and retention grants.

    WHO:
    Governor Josh Shapiro
    Lt. Governor Austin Davis
    Second Lady Blayre Holmes Davis
    Amy Kienle, President/CEO of YMCA of Greater Pittsburgh
    Robert Cherry, CEO of Partner4Work
    Child care workers

    WHEN:
    Tuesday, February 18, 2025 at 1:45PM

    WHERE:
    YMCA Child Development Center at Duquesne University
    112 Washington Place,
    Pittsburgh, PA 15219

    LIVE STREAM:
    pacast.com/live/gov
    governor.pa.gov/live/

    RSVP:
    Press who are interested in attending must RSVP with the names and phone numbers for each member of their team to ra-gvgovpress@pa.gov.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Security: Readout: Attorney General Bondi Briefed on National Security, Anti-Human Trafficking Efforts at Port of Tampa

    Source: United States Attorneys General 6

    Today, Attorney General Pam Bondi toured the Port of Tampa Bay – the largest port in Florida – and received a briefing from the Port’s CEO, Paul Anderson.

    Attorney General Bondi and Port Leadership discussed the Port’s important role in safeguarding Floridians and the American people as a key port of entry into this US. They also discussed the vital role that government plays in helping protect national security at ports.

    Other topics discussed included Port Tampa Bay’s advancements in protecting against foreign threats to physical and cyber security infrastructure, securing the Panama Canal, and ongoing coordination with the American Association of Port Authorities (AAPA) and the Coalition for America’s Gateways and Trade Corridors (CAGTC).

    Attorney General Bondi closed the briefing by thanking all in attendance for their important work on protecting the American people, safeguarding our national security, and encouraging the flow of commerce.

    Attorney General Bondi concluded by stating “Our ports are often the first line of defense in protecting Americans from national security threats like human trafficking, drug smuggling, and cybercrime. It was an honor to spend time with Paul Anderson and his team, who are collaborating closely with government partners and doing incredible work to protect Floridians and our Nation in my hometown of Tampa.”

    Participants:

    Paul Anderson, President and CEO of Port Tampa Bay

    Charles Klug, Principal Counsel of Port Tampa Bay

    Ken Washington, Vice President and Chief Information Officer of Port Tampa Bay

    Mark Dubina, Vice President of Security of Port Tampa Bay

    Laura Lenhart, Vice President of Government Affairs of Port Tampa Bay

    Sue Bai, Assistant Deputy Attorney General for National Security

    Catharine Cypher, Deputy Chief of Staff, Department of Justice

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI USA: February 17th, 2025 Heinrich to N.M. Legislature: “New Mexicans Are Counting on Us to Deliver”

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for New Mexico Martin Heinrich

    SANTA FE, N.M. – Today, U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) addressed a Joint Session of the New Mexico Legislature at the Roundhouse, New Mexico’s State Capitol in Santa Fe.

    “Serving you and representing this great state in the halls of our nation’s Capitol is a privilege that I will never take for granted,” said Heinrich. “The same goes for the mandate New Mexicans entrusted me with this last election: To deliver for the people and places of our great state. To fight for the freedoms, safety, opportunities, and dreams of our families, our communities, and our country. I will never shrink from that work.”

    PHOTO: U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) delivers remarks to the New Mexico Legislature, February 17, 2025.

    Heinrich started his remarks by calling for elected leaders to unify around delivering for New Mexicans: “I have always been struck by New Mexicans’ acute understanding of what it means to put individual differences aside in service to the greater good. In our most challenging times, New Mexicans show up for each other. From the darkest days of the Hermit’s Peak/Calf Canyon fire to last year’s flooding in Roswell, from North to South, and East to West, New Mexicans understand our shared commitment to one another.”

    Heinrich promised: “Let me be clear: My commitment, my only commitment, is to you, New Mexico. I will work — day and night — to defend the programs, funding, resources, and public lands our communities, local economies, and families rely on. Because, as elected leaders, we serve all of our constituents, from our neighbors and closest family friends to those in our community we’ve never met, or who disagree with us on nearly every issue. All of these New Mexicans are counting on us – all of us here in this room – to lead, to care, to keep our communities safe. Simply put, they are counting on us to deliver.”

    Heinrich commended the Legislature for its successful efforts to stand up permanent funds that generate revenues now and into the future — from the Early Childhood Trust Fund to the Land of Enchantment Legacy Fund — and praised legislators’ efforts in the current session to pass bills to reduce crime, expand behavioral health services, scale investments in work-based learning opportunities, career and technical education, and the Outdoor Equity Fund, establish a statewide water quality permitting program, and reform New Mexico’s Game and Fish Department and Game Commission.

    Heinrich concluded: “Working together, we can deliver the future our kids deserve. We can fight for their freedoms: the freedom to grow up to make their own health care decisions, the freedom to marry who they love, the freedom to be who they are, the freedom to be safe in their classrooms, and the freedom to pursue a fair shot at success. Let’s also keep working to protect our kids’ clean air, clean water, and public lands that will sustain their communities, economies, and sense of identity as New Mexicans. We can uphold this Democracy, commit to the Republic set out in our Constitution, and comply with our oaths of service to put ‘We the People’ first.”

    Below are Heinrich’s full remarks as prepared for delivery:

    Speaker Martinez, Senate President Pro Tempore Stewart, Lieutenant Governor Morales, members of the New Mexico Senate and House of Representatives.

    It is an absolute honor to be here with you this afternoon. 

    I am very pleased to be joined by my wife, Julie, several honored guests, and two of my colleagues and friends in the New Mexico Congressional Delegation, Senator Ben Ray Luján and Congresswoman Teresa Leger Fernández.

    I stand before you, today, at the start of my third term in the United States Senate.

    Serving you and representing this amazing state in the halls of our nation’s Capitol is a privilege that I will never take for granted.

    The same goes for the mandate New Mexicans entrusted me with this last election:

    To deliver for the people and the places of our incredible state.

    To fight for the freedoms, safety, opportunities, and dreams of our families, our communities, and our country.

    I will never shrink from that work.

    And make no mistake:

    Republican leadership in the White House and in the United States House and Senate will have very real impacts on our state and on individual New Mexicans.

    Some of you will agree with those, and others won’t agree with any of them.

    The same will probably be true of many of our constituents.

    Still, I have always been struck by New Mexicans’ acute understanding of what it means to put individual differences aside in service to the greater good.

    In our most challenging times, New Mexicans look out for each other.

    From the darkest days of the Hermit’s Peak/Calf Canyon Fire to last year’s flooding in Roswell.

    From North to South, and East to West, New Mexicans understand our shared commitment to one another.

    So let me be clear: My commitment, my only commitment, is to you, New Mexico.

    And I will lift up your voices in the most powerful halls of our Republic.

    Whether you are Mark from Albuquerque, a polio survivor who wrote to me about the life and death consequences of vaccines,

    Gary, a retired Air Force intelligence officer in Tularosa who wrote to me about the importance of defending our national security,

    Or Ashleigh from Truth or Consequences, a school social worker who called my office with deep concerns about how cuts at the Department of Education would impact her students.

    I will elevate New Mexicans’ voices and demand action, accountability, and the future our kids deserve.

    And I will work–day and night–to defend the programs, funding, resources, and public lands our communities, local economies, and families rely on.

    Because, as elected leaders, we serve all of our constituents.

    From our neighbors and closest family members to those in our community we’ve never met, or even who disagree with us on nearly every issue.

    All of these New Mexicans are counting on us here in this room – to lead, to give a damn, to keep our communities safe.

    Simply put, they are counting on us to deliver.

    And that requires grappling with difficult decisions.

    It requires solving real problems that impact real people.

    And it requires us to bridge the gap between what is, and what is possible.

    Always with New Mexicans front and center.

    You know, we live in an era of loyalty pledges.

    From the right and the left, frankly.

    From Presidents and from rank-and-file activists.

    From one elected leader to another, I want to implore you NOT to sign pledges, but to solve problems.

    Our only loyalty pledge should be to this incredible state and to this country, and the incredible people who call it home.

    Whether it’s to protect our nation from foreign terrorist threats or to just provide the support our kids need to learn to read —

    Whether it’s fixing roads that countless New Mexicans drive on every day or cutting crime in our communities –New Mexicans expect us to put them first, and we must.

    They should be able to count on us – at the federal, state, and local level – to ensure their roads, kids, food, water, and air are safe.

    And that includes ensuring that the agencies charged with doing this work are staffed, funded, and functional.

    Whether that’s at New Mexico’s Children, Youth and Families Department or the United States Environmental Protection Agency.

    Here, in the Land of Enchantment, we want our kids to be happy and healthy, with a fair shot at success, no matter what bathroom they use, how they dress, what color their hair is, or whether they have an IEP.

    We want New Mexico women to know that we trust them to make their own health care decisions, AND we will work to get them the quality health care they deserve in their own communities.

    We want New Mexico’s immigrant families to know we see them, we value them, and we will not turn our backs on them.

    And we want hardworking folks to know that “lowering costs,” “creating jobs,” and “growing the middle class” aren’t just campaign slogans.

    They require action.

    These are the pledges that we must work to deliver on.

    So let’s talk a little bit about what it means to put New Mexicans first:

    Your work to stand up permanent funds that generate revenues now and into the future—from the Early Childhood Trust Fund to the Land of Enchantment Legacy Fund—these put New Mexicans first.

    Your work to make our communities safer, increase access to mental health care, and tackle substance abuse puts New Mexicans first.

    When it comes to public safety, my own strategy has been straightforward: Solve crimes, support survivors, hold criminals accountable.

    But too many of our law enforcement agencies don’t have the basic tools they need to solve crimes.

    And when crimes go unsolved, those who commit them keep committing them.

    Since joining the Senate Appropriations Committee, I have worked to deliver federal resources to our partners in law enforcement.

    I’ve been able to appropriate funds for new ballistics testing machines in Las Cruces, Farmington, Gallup, and Roswell, so we can solve the first gun crime before a second one is committed.

    I’ve helped our local law enforcement purchase technology that detects gunshots and runs rapid DNA checks.

    This technology can mean solving a crime before it’s too late.

    In some cases, this may even be the difference between life and death for the victims of gun crimes.

    And I’ve helped local law enforcement purchase equipment to detect fentanyl and other illegal drugs, so they can hold drug traffickers accountable and get this poison out of our communities.

    But more is needed.

    If your car is stolen, the person who stole it should be found and held accountable.

    If your home is broken into, the person who did it should be found and held accountable.

    If your daughter is assaulted, the person who did it should be found and held accountable.

    It’s simple, but right now that’s not happening in far too many cases.

    We can all do better on this front.

    And I urge all of you to use your leadership to deliver strong public safety legislation that will make this happen.

    As many of you recognize, it does not have to be a choice between improving public safety and supporting our communities’ mental health care.

    We can walk and chew gum at the same time.

    I am speaking with a little bit of experience here.

    After the horrific mass shooting in Uvalde, I sat down with colleagues from both sides of the aisle, and we crafted what became the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act.

    That legislation tackled firearm safety, increased criminal penalties on firearm offenses like gun trafficking, AND it provided federal investments in community and school-based mental health services.

    Silver Consolidated Schools was the first school district in New Mexico to receive a $6 million School-Based Mental Health Services Grant under that law.

    These federal resources have helped the district hire psychologists, counselors, and other mental health professionals at all of their schools.

    These types of school-based mental health services are an essential piece of our overall behavioral health puzzle.

    If we could find this bipartisan pathway to improve public safety and mental health care at the federal level, I have every faith that you can do it here, too. 

    And, after last week’s votes on behavioral health in the Senate and the crime package in the House, you have created some much-needed momentum.

    Thank you.

    I applaud the Senate for your work to resource and restructure our state’s behavioral health system.

    We all know it’s a lot easier to tear down a system over a couple of years than it is to rebuild that system.

    And I applaud the House for negotiating and passing a crime package that takes on pressing issues in our communities from fentanyl to auto-theft, to gun crimes.

    Let’s keep this momentum going.

    There’s so much more that can and must be done at the state and federal levels to support the victims of crimes, and to support law enforcement as they work to hold accountable the perpetrators of crimes.

    Because, when it comes to making our communities safer, supporting victims and solving crime is a common ground we should all be able to support.

    And, in fact, it’s one our communities are depending on us to get right.

    We all want New Mexico to be the best possible place for our kids to grow up, to raise their families, and to build careers and families in their home communities.

    That means not only taking our crime epidemic seriously, but it also means investing in our kids, from cradle to career.

    The investments that this Legislature and New Mexico voters unlocked two years ago are helping our state lead the nation in making high-quality early childhood education and childcare accessible to all of our families.

    In the last few years, you have given our public school educators the pay raises they have long deserved.

    And we are scaling up a statewide network of full-service community schools.

    All of these investments are already beginning to deliver results.

    When you account for state and federal investments in our kids, from Medicaid to the state child tax credit, we don’t rank 50th in child poverty.

    We rank 17th.

    Better than the national average, not good enough, but we are far from finished.

    And I applaud you for looking to increase the child tax credit.

    This money will put resources right back into the pockets of New Mexico families who will invest it in their children.

    We should also be expanding apprenticeships and paid internships as early as high school.

    That’s how we will prepare the next generation of New Mexicans for career success.

    Here with me are Arnaldo Miramontes and Sandy Juarez, two young people who have found their career paths thanks to highly successful programs in our state.

    While in high school, Sandy had a paid internship at Christus Saint Vincent Hospital through Future Focused Education.

    She got hands-on experience in phlebotomy and now she’s preparing at Santa Fe Community College for a career in health care.

    Arnaldo is in his fifth and final year as an apprentice with the UA Local 412, and on his way to an incredible career with licenses in both plumbing and pipefitting.

    Both will be meeting demands in high needs industries right here in New Mexico.

    I encourage all of us to continue investing in career and technical education, paid internships and apprenticeships, and work-based learning opportunities for our young people.

    As I work to pass my Apprenticeship Pathways Act in the Senate, I hope that you will continue to identify targeted, sustained funding at the state level.

    We should look at everything from offering credit, to restructuring our school days to help students get more hands-on experiences in the workplace.

    This is critical to successfully building the workforce of the future.

    Finally, I hope you will continue to grow our state’s Outdoor Equity Fund and the opportunities it has unlocked for so many young New Mexicans.

    I am so proud that New Mexico is grounding more of our kids in the incredible lands that are their American birthright.

    Before I was ever an elected official, I was a guide and an educator. 

    And I saw time and again the remarkable difference it makes when children and teens spent time in the outdoors.

    I’ve invited as my guest today Ruben Apodaca a twelfth grader with the Honey Badger Conservation Crew at the Albuquerque Sign Language Academy.

    I visited their beekeeping and honey harvesting operation last year, which is receiving critical support from the Outdoor Equity Fund.

    Students who are deaf, hard of hearing, and with disabilities are managing their own beehives and bringing the honey products from those hives to market.

    This kind of hands-on experience is deeply valuable.

    I strongly encourage you to continue making transformational opportunities like this possible by scaling up the Outdoor Equity Fund.

    Finally, as we invest in the people of this great state, we must also invest in the lands, waters, and wildlife that are the fabric that we build our identities upon.

    Most of you have heard of the Supreme Court case that stripped federal protections from 90% of New Mexico’s surface waters.

    New Mexicans want our water and our watersheds protected.

    My guest Mark Allison from New Mexico Wild is one of the folks here advocating for two bills that would establish essential state-level protection of these waters that are now void of federal stewardship.

    I am also encouraged by the proposals that are moving forward to reform our state’s outdated and underfunded Department of Game and Fish and Game Commission.

    Brittany Fallon from Western Resource Advocates and Jesse Deubel from the New Mexico Wildlife Federation are here with me today.

    They are advocating for reforms that will ensure wildlife management decisions are based on biology rather than politics.

    These reforms account for the voices of farmers, ranchers, hunters, anglers, biologists, and wildlife conservationists.

    And they also include the sustainable funding needed to help our Game and Fish Department effectively do their work.

    There is nothing I enjoy more than packing into a spike camp during elk season.

    Our wild game has literally been the primary protein on my family’s dinner table for the last 20 years.

    So, I know full well the importance of the work needed to manage New Mexico’s wildlife.

    We need a 21st century wildlife conservation approach that leverages resources to manage all of our wild creatures—not just our game animals.

    We also need to make our Game Commission more representative and more accountable.

    And we need to make sure that we are leveraging the biology and resources to protect fish and wildlife so that they never become listed as threatened or endangered.

    While we address all of these needs for our communities, we must stay focused on our true North Star.

    That’s our kids.

    Working together, we can deliver the future our kids deserve.

    We can fight for their freedoms:

    The freedom to grow up to make their own health care decisions,

    The freedom to marry who they love,

    The freedom to be who they are,

    The freedom to feel safe in their classrooms,

    And the freedom to pursue a fair shot at success.

    Let’s also keep working to protect our kids’ clean air, clean water, and public lands that will sustain their communities, economies, and sense of identity as New Mexicans.

    We can uphold this Democracy, recommit to the Republic set out in our Constitution, and comply with our oaths of service to put “We the People” first.

    That doesn’t mean we will always agree on how to get that done.

    In fact, I’m pretty confident we will always find something to disagree on.

    Even if it’s just “red or green.”

    But if we always put “We the People” first,

    If we always pledge our loyalty to the people we serve, above all else:

    We will deliver the future our kids deserve.

    Thank you.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Police respond to IPCA review of policing public protests

    Source: New Zealand Police (National News)

    Please attribute to Deputy Commissioner Tania Kura:

    Police acknowledges the release of a comprehensive report by the Independent Police Conduct Authority (IPCA) which looks at the policing of public protests in New Zealand and makes several significant recommendations.

    Police has worked closely with the IPCA on this review, which has arisen from complaints to the independent body following high profile protests over recent years.

    We have seen a significant change in the protest environment, aided by social media, in which these events are becoming more publicised, highly organised and, in some instances, utilising complex tactics.

    We are now often faced with these events involving protesters, counter protesters, and activists who are present for a variety of different causes.

    These changes are a global trend which is putting more pressure on police jurisdictions around the world.

    In the last two years, New Zealand Police has attended and monitored at least 140 protests across the country.

    Police is always focussed on ensuring the community has the right to protest but balancing this against upholding the law and ensuring the safety of those attending, as well as members of the public in the vicinity.

    The 2022 parliamentary protest, as well as recent rallies regarding the conflict between Israel and Palestine, highlight some of the complex issues Police is dealing with.

    Today’s report recommends several changes and Police accepts and agrees with these in principle.

    The most significant is the recommendation for a new stand-alone legislation which would put New Zealand in line with comparative jurisdictions such as Australia, the United Kingdom, and Canada.

    Any legislative reform would be led by the Minister of Justice.

    There are also recommendations regarding police policies, processes, and training in the public order policing area.

    Police is considering how best to respond to these, noting that our organisation has already undertaken a raft of changes following the parliamentary protests.

    Our progress and work in this area has been acknowledged by the IPCA in the report.

    We know our officers who work in Public Order Policing teams, as well as all officers who attend to support and police these events, do an incredible job at keeping people safe in what can be a challenging and highly emotional environment.

    We know we must continually improve and adapt to the changing environment in protests and so we look forward to seeing where this review leads us.

    There were three separate investigations into protests in Auckland which are outlined in this review, and we have responded to each of these as below.

    Investigation one:

    The IPCA investigated a high number of complaints regarding the Police response to the Let Women Speak rally held at Albert Park in March 2023.

    This event became volatile very quickly due to behaviour by counter protesters who surrounded the rotunda when the main speaker arrived.

    Police acknowledge the finding by the IPCA in relation to the protest, which says our initial risk assessment could have been better.

    We also accept that our response on the day when protestors surrounded the rotunda was inadequate.

    We do note that our staff were also dealing with a separate unrelated protest on the same day, not far from this location, alongside other operational demands which put significant pressure on officers at these time sensitive events.

    The criticism of the policing of this event was not due to the fault of any individual officer but rather learnings around undertaking a better risk assessment for any future protests, ensuring we have adequate resourcing for these unpredictable events.

    We have debriefed this matter and taken these lessons onboard.

    We also note that Police carried out an investigation following the event, and two counter-protesters were charged with assault.

    Investigation two:

    The second investigation referenced in the IPCA report relates to the arrest of a counter-protestor during a rally in support of Palestine in November 2023 at Aotea Square, Auckland.

    A man was holding an Israeli flag around 150 metres from where protesters were setting up a speaking area.

    Police told the man to leave and stay away from the event to prevent a potential breach of the peace. They told the man he would be arrested if he returned.

    The man left but returned without his flag, his face covered, and stood in Aotea Square while speeches took place.

    He was arrested and charged with intentionally obstructing a police officer acting in the execution of his duty.

    Police accept this arrest was unlawful and while the intent of the officers was to ensure the man’s safety, we accept they had no lawful basis to tell him to leave or to arrest him when he returned.

    We have spoken with the officers involved in this incident and have used this as a learning opportunity for them. 

    The charge of obstruction was withdrawn.

    Investigation three:

    During the same rally in Auckland’s CBD in November 2023, Police came across a different counter-protester who was holding a sign which they believed had the potential to incite violence.

    Police, concerned for the woman’s safety, asked her to move and put down her sign and when she failed to comply, they had to move her a short distance away and took her sign off her.

    When she continued to try and re-enter the protest they arrested her for a breach of the peace.

    The IPCA has found the use of force to move the woman away was unjustified and the arrest was unlawful.

    While Police acknowledge the IPCA’s view on this, we believe our officers were acting in the woman’s best interests to keep her safe due to their previous experience at pro-Palestine events which had turned violent very quickly.

    We do accept that she should have been given her sign back when she was released by Police. 

    The primary role of Police at these events is to ensure everyone’s safety while they protest.

    If there is a concern that someone may be harmed, Police will act within the boundaries of the law to protect all individuals present. 

    We recognise the delicate balance between a person’s right to peacefully protest and maintaining public order.

    Our officers are entrusted to make these decisions based on their knowledge and information available to them.

    ENDS

    Issued by the Police Media Centre 

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: Use Upcoming Tenth Anniversary of Minsk Accord’s Signing to Renew Diplomatic Efforts towards De-escalation in Ukraine, Assistant Secretary-General Urges Security Council

    Source: United Nations MIL OSI b

    The Minsk Agreements show that the signing of a peace pact alone does not ensure a durable end to conflict, the Security Council heard today as it met a decade after the adoption of Council resolution 2202 (2015), which called for the full implementation of those accords.

    The international community must use the 10-year anniversary as an opportunity to “recall past diplomatic efforts towards de-escalation” as well as reflect “on what happens when peacemaking fails”, Miroslav Jenča, Assistant Secretary-General for Europe, Central Asia and Americas in the Departments of Political and Peacebuilding Affairs and Peace Operations, said.  He noted that in one week, it will be “three tragic years” since the Russian Federation’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

    Highlighting the crucial role of regional and subregional organizations, he praised the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) Special Monitoring Mission for monitoring ceasefire violations and helping to maintain dialogue for “eight difficult years”.  Any peaceful settlement must respect the sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity of Ukraine, he said, welcoming all initiatives with the full participation of Ukraine and the Russian Federation.  Ensuring the conflict does not reoccur or escalate requires genuine political will and understanding of its “multidimensional complexity”, he said.

    Peace Activist Haunted by Dead Ukrainian, Russian Soldiers, Says War Could Have Been Avoided through Diplomacy

    “The people of Ukraine are divided – they are either pro- or anti-Russian,” stated Roger Waters, civil peace activist, who also addressed the Council today.  To those questioning his credentials, he said:  “I’m here to talk about war and peace and love, and my credentials are firmly in place.” “Hundreds of thousands of dead Ukrainian and Russian soldiers […] are in this room with us today [and] they haunt me,” he said. 

    Recalling the Maidan protests in Kyiv, he stressed that this is one of the problems with regime change — “dead bodies, they are somebody’s loved one”. Immediately after the Government change in 2014, Crimea seceded from Ukraine and joined the Russian Federation. “Did it secede or was it annexed?” he asked, pointing to a referendum held at the time, in which 95 per cent of Ukrainians in Crimea voted to secede. 

    The agreements — Minsk I, signed in September 2014, and Minsk II, in February 2015 — outlined steps for ending the conflict in eastern Ukraine through a political settlement.  The latter accord stipulated a ceasefire in certain areas of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions and the withdrawal of military equipment by both sides.  It also included a commitment by Kyiv to organize local elections and grant special status to the separatist-held areas in eastern Ukraine and the reinstatement of Ukraine’s full control over its border.

    Mr. Waters said that despite campaigning on the promise to resume Minsk II, Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who came to power in 2019, did not do so, and in 2022, Russian troops crossed the border to Ukraine. This war could have been avoided through diplomacy, he insisted, adding that President Zelenskyy had started talking to Russian President Vladimir Putin and by the end of April 2014, a ceasefire agreement had been agreed upon in Istanbul.  The war could have been a stillborn, but then United Kingdom Prime Minister Boris Johnson arrived in Kyiv with the message that the war should be continued as it “suits the Americans” — “the longer it takes, the better”. 

    Citing the telephone talks between United States President Donald Trump and President Putin as a potential move in the right direction, he concluded:  “Maybe there is a glimmer of light at the end of this dark tunnel of war — it comes three years and hundreds of thousands of priceless lives too late, but maybe it’s a start.”

    United States Committed to Ending Carnage, Restoring Europe’s Stability, its Speaker Says 

    Washington, D.C., is committed to ending the carnage and restoring Europe’s stability, the representative of the United States said, adding:  “We want a sovereign and prosperous Ukraine but we must start by recognizing that returning to Ukraine’s pre-2014 borders is an unrealistic objective.”  Further, he added:  “Chasing this illusionary goal will only prolong the war and cause more suffering.” At the same time, he underscored that the Russian Federation has consistently undermined the Minsk Agreement; therefore, a durable peace for Ukraine must include robust security guarantees to ensure the war will not begin again.  Describing Moscow’s illegal war of conquest as “a strategic error”, he said that “the easy way out is through negotiations”.  If Moscow, instead, “chooses the hard way”, it will incur greater and escalating costs to its economy and losses on the battlefield, he warned. 

    New United States Administration Has Created Space for Diplomacy, Russian Federation’s Representative Says 

    For his part, the Russian Federation’s delegate said that “the entry into office of the Republican United States Administration” has created space for the emergence of diplomacy.  Those who seized power in Ukraine, following the 2014 anti-constitutional coup, had no intention of implementing the Minsk Agreements, he said.  Citing statements by various Ukrainian officials who described the Agreements as “a noose on the neck” and “not binding in nature”, he said the Agreements were “a smokescreen” for Western countries while they provided Ukraine armaments. 

    Outlining lessons to draw from the failure of the Minsk process, he said European Union countries and the United Kingdom are “unfaithful to their word and they cannot be a party to any future agreement”.  Also stressing the need to provide autonomy to the east of Ukraine and guarantees for its Russian language population, he said that President Zelenskyy “is deathly afraid of elections and is doing everything possible to drag them out”.  A future Ukraine needs to be “a demilitarized neutral State, not a part of any blocs or alliances,” he said, adding that it was the prospect of the entry of Ukraine into the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) that triggered the crisis.

    Entire History of Minsk Agreement “Long List of Violations’ by Moscow”, Ukraine’s Delegate Says

    However, Ukraine’s delegate countered that the entire history of the Minsk Agreements “was a long list of violations” by Moscow.  In 2022, “on this very day”, “in this very chamber”, when her country expressed concern about the buildup of troops along its border and other developments, the Russian Federation had underscored that there is no alternative to the Minsk Agreements, she recalled.  Four days later, that country recognized the so-called independence of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions of Ukraine.  Among others, it never implemented paragraph 4 of the Minsk Protocol, concerning the establishment of a security area in the border regions of the two countries, she said.

     “It is because people of Ukraine are pro-Ukrainian [that] the Russian Federation has failed,” she added.  Any future arrangement involving the Kremlin must include enforcement mechanisms and preventive measures, she stressed, adding:  “What responsible States see as commitments to be upheld, the Russian Federation treats as a tactical ploy.”  Ukraine is working with its partners to find strong solutions, she said, stressing:  “Weak agreements will not bring real peace; they will only lead to the greater war.” 

    Other Council Members Weigh In

    Denmark’s delegate described the current meeting as “part of an ongoing disinformation campaign” to try and distract the international community from the subjugation of Ukraine.  Welcoming Ukraine’s ratification of the Rome Statute, she expressed support for a special tribunal to investigate crimes conducted in that country.  While “no one wants this war to end more than Ukraine”, the United Kingdom’s delegate said, President Putin’s preconditions for talks have been that Ukraine withdraws from large swathes of its own sovereign territory and abandons its right to choose its alliances.  “No country could accept this,” she said, reaffirming that London will provide concrete support for Ukraine for as long as needed. 

    “The Minsk Agreements were a diplomatic initiative designed to prevent further bloodshed and establish a political pathway to peace in Ukraine,” said Germany’s representative, adding that Moscow obstructed its implementation and chose to pursue expansionist conquest.  “This war should not have been started in the first place,” she stressed, calling on all States to unite behind the draft General Assembly resolution on advancing peace in Ukraine.  Along similar lines, France’s delegate highlighted the tireless mediation by Paris and Berlin, to enable Ukraine and Russian Federation to find common ground. However, Moscow chose war, he said, while Greece’s delegate stressed that “no interpretation of the Minsk Agreements can ever justify the invasion of Ukraine”.

    “We need something more than Minsk III,” Slovenia’s delegate said, adding that the abstract nature of the Agreements allowed for multiple interpretations.  Any future accord must be much be more specific with clear timelines, defined sequencing and a monitoring mechanism, he stressed.  Similarly, Somalia’s delegate underscored the importance of clarity, particularly in diplomatic tools, and said the implementation of ceasefire provisions requires robust and impartial verifying mechanisms.  The Republic of Korea’s delegate stressed that “the entire world is well aware of who is aggressor and who is the victim,” also adding that the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea’s support of the Russian Federation, with troops and munitions, is a grave violation of the Organization’s resolutions. 

    Several speakers expressed concern about the failure of diplomacy, while others called on the international community to rally behind new diplomatic efforts.  Since the onset of the Ukraine crisis, Beijing has been calling for a political solution through dialogue and has been actively engaged in diplomatic mediations, China’s representative, Council President for the month, said in his national capacity.  The legitimate security concerns of all countries should be taken seriously, he said, welcoming the Washington, D.C.-Moscow agreement to start peace talks. 

    “We have been consistent in our calls for restraint,” said Pakistan’s delegate, as he expressed regret that the Minsk Agreement could not reach just and lasting peace in the region.  “We must learn from the past so we do not commit the same errors,” Panama’s delegate added, stressing that dialogue and diplomacy is the only path to peace. 

    “The failed implementation of the Minsk Agreement cannot be the reason to prolong this war,” said Guyana’s delegate, reiterating calls for an end to the hostilities and for the withdrawal of Russian Federation’s forces from Ukraine’s territory.  “Until this day more and more civilians are losing their lives, including women and children,” pointed out Algeria’s representative, while Sierra Leone’s delegate underscored that “the conflict in Ukraine will not be resolved by military means”.

    MIL OSI United Nations News

  • MIL-OSI Canada: Statement by the Prime Minister on the passing of Antonine Maillet

    Source: Government of Canada – Prime Minister

    The Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau, today issued the following statement on the passing of Antonine Maillet:

    “It is with great sadness that I learned of the passing of Antonine Maillet, a celebrated figure in Canadian literature and an unwavering voice for the Acadian community.

    “Born in Bouctouche, New Brunswick, Ms. Maillet had a prolific career as a novelist, a playwright, and a scholar, leaving an indelible mark on Canada’s cultural landscape. Over some fifty works, she brought Acadian stories to the forefront. This included her play La Sagouine, which made her a household name, and her novel Pélagie-la-Charrette, which earned her the 1979 Prix Goncourt – making her only the sixth woman to receive this prestigious French literature award and the first non-European recipient. Ms. Maillet’s work helped foster a deeper understanding and appreciation of Acadian culture and earned her widespread recognition. She was a recipient of the Order of New Brunswick, an Officer of the National Order of Quebec, and a Companion of the Order of Canada, among many other accolades.

    “Ms. Maillet was also a translator of literary works and a passionate educator, who taught in Canada and abroad, including at the Université de Montréal and the University of California. From 1989 to 2000, she served as Chancellor of the Université de Moncton, where she further helped shine a light on Acadian culture.

    “On behalf of all Canadians, I extend my deepest condolences to Ms. Maillet’s family, her friends, and the countless people who were touched by her work. She was a beacon of Acadian pride and resilience, and I know her voice will continue to inspire generations to celebrate the stories that make Canada’s cultural tapestry so rich and diverse.”

    MIL OSI Canada News

  • MIL-Evening Report: Is Australia’s GST a tax or a tariff? And why has it become a target in the trade wars?

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Felicity Deane, Professor, Queensland University of Technology

    Australian beef exports to the United States are GST-free and should not be subject to any retaliatory tariff. William Edge/Shutterstock

    The latest round of proposed tariffs from US President Donald Trump includes a response to what the White House describes as “unfair” taxes – specifically, value-added taxes such as Australia’s Goods and Services Tax (GST).

    Most economically advanced countries have a value-added tax (VAT) or sales tax on consumption. This applies to domestic goods and services as well as to imports. The United States is one of the few countries that does not impose a sales tax, though many of the states impose their own sales tax.

    So the argument, according to the White House, is these taxes apply to imported goods, but not to exports.

    Is the GST a tax or a tariff?

    The GST is a broad-based consumption tax of 10%. It applies to most goods and services that are consumed in Australia, regardless of their origin.

    An import tariff – sometimes called an import duty – is imposed exclusively on imported goods as a condition of market access.

    Tariffs are not imposed on domestically produced goods at all. This is the main point of difference with a domestic consumption tax. The GST applies equally to imported and domestically produced goods, adhering to long-agreed international trade rules.

    It remains unclear how the Trump administration intends to implement a tariff that is equivalent to the 10% GST. In effect, this becomes a tax on US consumers if they buy Australian goods.




    Read more:
    What’s a trade war?


    Such an indirect tax would be regressive, which means it falls more heavily on lower-income consumers. The expansion of tariffs to include other nations’ VAT systems also represents a significant overreach into national sovereignty. It has long been accepted that sovereign nations have the right to tax their citizens and businesses as they see fit.

    Indeed, Australia’s GST is among the lowest among economically advanced nations, for which the average is 19%, so the wider impact on US consumers will be even greater.

    Goods that are exported to the US face a new round of tariffs.
    Shutterstock

    Trump is clearly (and unapologetically) seeking to reinvigorate US manufacturing. But the reality is that US labour costs are high. It is also inefficient for any country to produce all the goods and services its population requires. This is particularly the case in such a high-consumption nation as the US.

    The US has been described as a consumer of last resort
    because strong consumer demand has been filled by ever rising imports from other countries. The mutually beneficial relationship between the US and China has enabled the rise of the middle class in China. Trump’s tariffs may shift this, causing geopolitical tensions and economic instability.

    Australia’s response: pausing the digital services tax

    While these tariffs primarily harm US consumers, Australian businesses will also feel the effects. However, it is unclear to what extent. Notably, one main export to the US, unprocessed agricultural products such as beef, are GST-free and should not be subject to any retaliatory tariff.

    However, many other Australian exports could be disadvantaged. Trump’s policies will raise the cost of Australian imported goods in the US market, potentially making them less appealing to US consumers.

    The threat of these tariffs is clearly a problem for a federal government facing an impending election, and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has so far responded cautiously. While a diplomatic approach may secure a minor concession, it’s in stark contrast to Canada’s firm stance, which included immediate threats of retaliatory measures.




    Read more:
    Whether we carve out an exemption or not, Trump’s latest tariffs will still hit Australia


    Trump’s use of tariff threats as a negotiating tactic does appear to be having the desired effect, with a potential suspension of Australia’s proposed big tech levy. This proposal would have imposed a tax on major tech firms such as Meta and Google if they did not reach a direct agreement with local media companies.

    Reports indicate the government has put this proposal on hold due to the risk of retaliatory tariffs from the US. Such a tax would likely have invoked the wrath of the US administration, with the digital services levies of Canada and France specifically referenced in the most recent White House tariff announcement.

    It is fair to say the White House statement deliberately misleads any reader into thinking that tariff percentages directly impact on trade volumes.

    This statement ignores a fundamental principle that has made international trade so appealing since World War II – and why economists have argued in support of it for hundreds of years. Countries produce and trade the goods and services at which they are efficient. Efficiency leads to lower costs which, all else being equal, means consumers are better off.

    The statement from the White House, together with Trump’s past pronouncements, demonstrate that all rules to do with international taxation and fairness have been thrown out.

    This does not appear to be the main concern, however, with Australian negotiators potentially willing to put on hold a crucial policy to ensure the long-term viability of local journalism.

    This is just the beginning. Anyone who felt some comfort and safety in the strength of our own democracy should carefully consider the overreach that is occurring through these threats.

    Felicity Deane does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Is Australia’s GST a tax or a tariff? And why has it become a target in the trade wars? – https://theconversation.com/is-australias-gst-a-tax-or-a-tariff-and-why-has-it-become-a-target-in-the-trade-wars-250041

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-Evening Report: With just 5 years to go, the world is failing on a vital deal to halt biodiversity loss

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Justine Bell-James, Professor, TC Beirne School of Law, The University of Queensland

    Almost 200 nations have signed an ambitious agreement to halt and reverse biodiversity loss but none is on track to meet the crucial goal, our new research reveals.

    The agreement, known formally as the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, seeks to coordinate global efforts to conserve and restore biodiversity. Its overarching goal is to safeguard biodiversity for future generations.

    Biodiversity refers to the richness and variety within and between plant and animal species, and within ecosystems. This diversity is declining faster than at any time in human history.

    Five years remain until the framework’s 2030 deadline. Our research shows a more intense global effort is needed to achieve the goals of the agreement and stem the biodiversity crisis.

    Biodiversity is in decline

    Biodiversity decline is a growing global issue. Around one million animal and plant species are threatened with extinction.

    The problem is driven by human activities such as land clearing, climate change, pollution, excessive resource extraction and the introduction of invasive species.

    As biodiversity continues to degrade, the foundation of life on Earth becomes increasingly unstable. Biodiversity loss threatens our food, water and air. It increases our vulnerability to natural disasters and imperils ecosystems crucial for human survival and wellbeing.

    The Global Biodiversity Framework was adopted in late 2022 after four years of consultation and negotiation. It involved 23 core commitments to be met by 2030 involving both land and sea. Key to the deal is protecting areas from future harm, and restoring past harms.

    These aims are captured in two targets.

    The first is ensuring 30% of degraded areas are under “effective restoration” to enhance biodiversity. This could involve replanting vegetation, reducing weeds and other pests, or restoring water to drained areas.

    The second is to effectively conserve and manage 30% of land and sea areas – especially those important for biodiversity and the ways ecosystems function and benefit humans. This could mean creating national or marine parks, or nature refuges on private land.

    Importantly, countries should both increase the size of areas protected or under restoration (a matter of quantity), and choose areas where interventions will most benefit biodiversity (a matter of quality).

    Nations were asked to provide an action plan before October 2024. In a paper published today, we reviewed these plans.

    What we found

    Our findings were disappointing. Only 36 countries (less than one quarter of signatory nations) submitted a plan. Australia was one of them.

    And the plans provided were underwhelming. In particular, nations fell badly short on the restoration target. Only nine out of 36 countries committed to restoring a specific percentage of land and sea.

    For example, Italy pledged only to restore “large surfaces of degraded areas” and Australia committed to restoring “priority degraded areas”.

    Defining commitments with numbers is important, because it allows progress to be monitored and measured, and forces nations to be accountable.

    Of those nine countries that made specific restoration commitments, only six committed to the 30% goal: Aruba, China, Curaçao, Japan, Luxembourg and Uganda.

    The results were better when it came to protecting land and sea. Some 22 of the 36 countries set a percentage target for protection. However, only 14 committed to protecting at least 30% of areas, in line with the goals of the deal.

    Again, quality is also important here. Under the deal nations signed up to, protected land should enhance biodiversity, and cover areas very valuable for biodiversity recovery. However, many nations were silent on the issue of quality when outlining their planned protections. It means their efforts could, in some cases, do little for biodiversity.

    A spotlight on Australia

    In recent years, Australia has sought to establish itself as a biodiversity leader on the international stage. This included hosting the global Nature Positive Summit in October last year.

    Following the summit, the federal government claimed it was:

    a tangible demonstration of Australia’s commitments under the Kunming Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. It showed our willingness to work collaboratively towards the goal of halting and reversing biodiversity loss.

    But despite the rhetoric, our research shows Australia’s plans are not particularly impressive.

    As noted above, Australia does not provide a percentage target for ecosystem restoration. Instead, its plan refers broadly to restoring “priority areas” without defining what these areas are.

    Australia’s plan pledges to identify “priority degraded areas” and define what “under effective restoration” means, but does not outline how this will be done.

    Australia is more aligned with global leaders on protection of biodiversity. It committed to safeguarding 30% of land and water in protected areas.

    However, it provided limited details on how it will select, implement and enforce protection measures. The plan also fails to recognise current shortcomings in protected areas, both in oceans and on land – in particular, Australia’s focus to date on quantity over quality when it comes to selecting sites.

    In contrast, the nation of Slovenia mapped out proposed protected areas.

    So, while Australia did submit an action plan, it has missed the opportunity to be a true global leader.

    Running out of time

    The Global Biodiversity Framework aims to unite nations in the fight to conserve and restore biodiversity. But as our research shows, many countries do not have plans to achieve this, and plans submitted to date are largely inadequate.

    As species and habitats are lost, ecosystems become less stable. This damages human health and wellbeing, as well as economies. Biodiversity loss also undermines vital cultural and spiritual connections to nature.

    All countries must accelerate efforts to avert the biodiversity crisis, and preserve Earth’s precious natural places for future generations.

    Justine Bell-James receives funding from the Australian Research Council, the National Environmental Science Program, and Queensland Government’s Department of Environment, Tourism, Science and Innovation. She is a Director of the National Environmental Law Association.

    James Watson has received funding from the Australian Research Council, National Environmental Science Program, South Australia’s Department of Environment and Water, Queensland’s Department of Environment, Science and Innovation as well as from Bush Heritage Australia, Queensland Conservation Council, Australian Conservation Foundation, The Wilderness Society and Birdlife Australia. He serves on the scientific committee of BirdLife Australia and has a long-term scientific relationship with Bush Heritage Australia and Wildlife Conservation Society. He serves on the Queensland government’s Land Restoration Fund’s Investment Panel as the Deputy Chair.

    ref. With just 5 years to go, the world is failing on a vital deal to halt biodiversity loss – https://theconversation.com/with-just-5-years-to-go-the-world-is-failing-on-a-vital-deal-to-halt-biodiversity-loss-249841

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: Committee on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women Holds Half-Day General Discussion on Gender Stereotypes

    Source: United Nations – Geneva

    The Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women today held a half-day general discussion on its proposed general recommendation on gender stereotypes.

    In opening remarks, Nahla Haidar, Committee Chairperson, said gender stereotypes created false beliefs, inhibitive gender roles and discrimination. The Committee hoped to prepare guidelines that would help States to address these stereotypes, and counter myths and common excuses as to why gender stereotypes continued to be perpetuated, such as cultural and religious reasons.

    Peggy Hicks, Director, Thematic Engagement, Special Procedures and Right to Development Division, United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, said in introductory remarks that the general recommendation would provide guidance on State obligations to address gender stereotypes as root causes of gender-based discrimination.  She expressed hope that it would strengthen standards, principles and guidance to eliminate all forms of gender stereotypes.

    In her introductory remarks, Natalia Kanem, Executive Director, United Nations Population Fund, said that currently, around the world, there were immense pushbacks against women and girls in all their diversity.  In this uncertain moment, all parties needed to stand with women and engage actively in developing this general recommendation.  The work of the Committee saved and transformed lives; it needed to continue.

    Nyaradzayi Gumbonzvanda, Deputy Executive Director, United Nations Women, said gender stereotypes were barriers to the human rights of women and girls.  They restricted education, jobs, leadership, health and justice, fuelling inequality and violence, silencing women and denying freedoms.  General recommendation 41 presented a decisive opportunity to dismantle gender stereotypes at their core.

    Bandana Rana and Rhoda Reddock, Committee Experts and Co-Chairs of the Committee Working Group on gender stereotypes, also made introductory statements, calling on all stakeholders to support and provide input for the general recommendation.

    After the introductory remarks, the Committee held a panel discussion on gender stereotypes, hearing presentations from Adriana Quinones, Head, Human Rights and Development, United Nations Women; Joni van de Sand, Global MenEngage Alliance; Paola Daher, Women Deliver; Alexandra Xanthaki, United Nations Special Rapporteur in the field of cultural rights; and Marwa Sharafeldin, Musawah.

    Following the panel discussion, States parties, United Nations agencies, and civil society representatives delivered oral statements. Speaking were Malta, Andorra, Poland, Canada, Vanuatu, Cyprus, Japan, Chile, Maldives, Ukraine, Austria, Azerbaijan, United Arab Emirates, Mexico, Bulgaria, Israel, Venezuela, Bolivia, Spain, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization and Nepal.

    Also speaking were Consortium for Intersectional Justice, Observatorio Iberoamericano Contra la Violencia de Género, Duch Cedaw Network, WILPF, Center for Reproductive Rights, European Network of Migrant Women, Tania Sordo Ruz, Nordic Model Now, and Ilga World.

    The Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women’s ninetieth session is being held from 3 to 21 February.  All documents relating to the Committee’s work, including reports submitted by States parties, can be found on the session’s webpage.  Meeting summary releases can be found here.  The webcast of the Committee’s public meetings can be accessed via the UN Web TV webpage.

    The Committee will next meet at 5 p.m. on Friday, 21 February to close its ninetieth session.

    Introductory Remarks

    NAHLA HAIDAR, Committee Chair, welcomed all participants to the meeting.  She said that the Committee was mandated to issue recommendations to States parties and provide guidance on themes related to women’s rights.  The discussions to be held today would focus on the Committee’s proposed general recommendation on general stereotypes, which the Committee urged all stakeholders to support.  Gender stereotypes created false beliefs, inhibitive gender roles and discrimination.  Measures needed to be implemented to combat them.  The Committee hoped to prepare guidelines that would help States to address these stereotypes, and counter myths and common excuses as to why gender stereotypes continued to be perpetuated, such as cultural and religious reasons.

    PEGGY HICKS, Director, Thematic Engagement, Special Procedures and Right to Development Division, United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, said she could not think of a timelier topic.  The general recommendation on gender stereotypes would provide guidance on State obligations to address these stereotypes as root causes of gender-based discrimination.  She expressed hope that it would strengthen standards, principles and guidance to eliminate all forms of gender stereotypes.

    Gender stereotypes were justified under the banners of “tradition,” “culture,” “religion” or even “nature.”  They often stemmed from patriarchal systems that tolerated or affirmed unequal power relations, based on the idea that women were inferior to men.  Discriminatory practices against women and girls needed to be eliminated, regardless of their origins, including those perpetuated in the name of culture or religion.

    The impacts of gender stereotyping began in the family and were apparent in every aspect of the lives of women and girls.  Gender stereotyping normalised violence against women and girls, politicised their reproductive functions, and denied them equal participation in political life and economic opportunities.  Women who did not conform to gender stereotypes or who openly contested them were particularly exposed to discrimination, violence and criminalisation.  

    It was crucial to address stereotypes that manifested first in the family and were then perpetuated in education systems and all aspects of society, including virtual spaces.  Transforming education systems to eliminate gender stereotypes was essential; human rights-based education was a powerful tool to dispel stereotypes.

    The discussion would address the unique vulnerabilities faced by women and girls who experienced combined stereotypes based on gender and other grounds, such as ethnicity, socioeconomic status, disability and age.  The general recommendation needed to address how to rectify the impact of intersecting forms of stereotypes, resulting discriminations and corresponding State obligations.

    Gender stereotypes trapped men and boys, conditioning them to embrace harmful ideas of masculinity.  Men and boys needed to challenge unequal power relations and structures, recognising how patriarchy privileged them and how gender equality liberated all.  Combatting gender stereotypes demanded a comprehensive approach involving the transformation of laws, policies and societal structures.  

    The general recommendation would enable States parties to change and transform gender stereotypes, paving the way for the full realisation of all human rights for all women and girls.  The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights was ready to support this work.  It had concrete analytical tools and the mandate and expertise to monitor these issues, provide technical assistance, and build the capacity of key stakeholders.

    NATALIA KANEM, Executive Director, United Nations Population Fund, said it was currently a moment of grave import for the rights of women and girls. Around the world, there were immense pushbacks against women and girls in all their diversity.  Fierce opposition was threatening progress on several fronts.  It was welcome that maternal mortality had dropped by a third, and more than 160 countries had passed laws to address domestic violence. 

    However, the United Nations Population Fund regularly heard stories like those of Amena’s, who had been informed at age 13 by her parents that she was to be married.  The Fund had helped Amena to stand up for her rights and she was able to return to school.

    Gender stereotypes perpetuated stigma and shame around girls’ sexuality, and they posed significant risks to economic and social stability, contributing to the gender wage gap. Poverty often wore the face of a woman. Stereotypes also often led to gender-based violence, particularly online.  Discrimination severely limited the participation of women and girls in the digital space.  The ripple effects of these stereotypes drove political polarisation, fractured communities and exacerbated inequality.  They contributed to a world where progress and peace were illusive. 

    Gender discrimination was compounded by factors such as age, race and disability status.  The Fund was training healthcare workers to provide non-judgemental care for women, so women could make informed choices about their bodies and lives.

    Gender stereotypes were perpetuated in all segments of society.  The Fund was empowering girls to become leaders and was working to create a digital world that was safe and accessible for everyone.  It was also working with boys and men to ensure that they were not trapped by gender stereotypes.  It would continue to support policies and programmes that aimed to address harmful social norms.  The Committee needed to formulate processes that would give women their own money, self-agency and bodily autonomy.

    In this uncertain moment, all parties needed to stand with women.  All stakeholders needed to engage actively in developing this general recommendation.  This was not the time to roll back the clock on women’s rights.  The work of the Committee saved and transformed lives. It needed to continue.

    NYARADZAYI GUMBONZVANDA, Deputy Executive Director, United Nations Women, said United Nations Women was proud to support general recommendation 41.  Gender stereotypes were barriers to the human rights of women and girls.  They restricted education, jobs, leadership, health and justice, fuelling inequality and violence, silencing women and denying freedoms.  

    Gender stereotypes’ impact was clear in politics, where women faced double standards, exclusion and relentless scrutiny.  They also fuelled violence and impunity, with women and girls too often being valued first as wives and daughters, and not as full human beings with rights.  Stereotypes further dictated economic power, with women being denied inheritance rights.

    United Nations Women commended its Member States for adopting strong regional frameworks to combat gender-based violence and discrimination, including the Belem do Para Convention, the Istanbul Convention, and the African Union Convention on Ending Violence against Women.  Commitments needed to translate into action.  Lifting reservations to the Convention, which weakened protections and kept barriers in place, was urgent.

    General recommendation 41 presented a decisive opportunity to dismantle gender stereotypes at their core.  The year 2025 marked 30 years since the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action.  It was also the final stretch toward the expiration date of the Sustainable Development Goals, which pledged to end harmful practices against women and girls. General recommendation 41 was a critical tool for transformation that needed to be acted on immediately.

    BANDANA RANA, Committee Expert and Co-Chair of the Committee Working Group on Gender Stereotypes, said the Committee, at its eighty-fourth session, had agreed to start the elaboration of a general recommendation on gender stereotypes.  Harmful gender stereotypes were one of the biggest stumbling blocks to gender equality.  They contributed to unequal representation in workplaces and policies, and contributed to gender-based violence. 

    The Convention called on States to challenge traditional norms that limited women’s’ representation in all areas of society.  The general recommendation would dismantle discriminatory stereotypes and provide guidance on addressing these stereotypes and creating a more just society.  Together, they could create more equitable societies, as envisioned by the Sustainable Development Goals.  Ms. Rana called on all stakeholders to actively contribute to the general recommendation, dismantle gender stereotypes, and build a future where everyone could thrive without barriers.

    RHODA REDDOCK, Committee Expert and Co-Chair of the Committee Working Group on Gender Stereotypes, said gender stereotypes were based on ideas, attitudes, belief systems and patriarchal structures that existed in all societies.  They reflected the notion of women being inferior to men. The Convention called on all States parties to modify social patterns and cultural practices that were based on stereotyped roles of men and women.  Stereotypes often changed, and new ones were regularly created.  Women’s structured inferiority moved with them to all activities where they predominated.  This issue was central to the equal valuing of women and men.  Ms. Reddock called on all stakeholders for support as the Committee developed the general recommendation.

    Summary of Statements by Panellists

    After the introductory remarks, the Committee held a panel discussion on gender stereotypes, hearing presentations from Adriana Quinones, Head, Human Rights and Development, United Nations Women; Joni van de Sand, Global MenEngage Alliance; Paola Daher, Women Deliver; Alexandra Xanthaki, United Nations Special Rapporteur in the field of cultural rights; and Marwa Sharafeldin, Musawah.

    Many speakers expressed concern that currently, women’s rights were under threat from those with immense power.  There was a mounting backlash against diversity, inclusion and lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex rights, and new policies and platforms for discrimination were emerging.  Stereotypes between men and women were becoming more apparent and legitimised.

    Speakers said gender stereotypes were key pillars of patriarchal domination and power. They did not emerge in a vacuum; they were used to determine roles and behaviours that conformed to power relations, and they became stubbornly resistant over time.  They had a negative impact on the full realisation of the rights of women and girls, including their rights to work, education, and sexual and reproductive health.  Persons who challenged traditional notions of the family faced discrimination.  Gender stereotypes often intersected with stereotypes related to race, class and other aspects. 

    Speakers expressed national measures implemented to address gender stereotypes and promote gender mainstreaming, and offered the Committee support in addressing gender stereotypes.

    One speaker said an increasing number of young men in the world thought that gender equality had gone too far.  Transforming stereotypes against men was crucial in advancing gender equality.  A key strategy in this regard was to promote masculinity rooted in concepts of care and environmental protection, they said. The general recommendation needed to elaborate on how transforming gender stereotypes was relevant to men and masculinities.

    Another speaker said the Committee needed to recognise that stereotypes were not perpetuated by the abstract concept of “culture”.  The general recommendation needed to recognise that women’s rights and agency came from culture.  The general recommendation needed to recognise that it was how culture was being used by elites that made it harmful. 

    The rights enshrined in the Convention belonged to all women, including lesbian, bisexual, transgender and intersex women, one speaker said.  Womanhood needed to be recognised through self-identification.  The Committee needed to continue to eradicate stereotypes in international law regarding the definition of a woman.

    One speaker said that religion, law and the family were fields where transformative change was possible to dismantle gender stereotypes.  Religion was a source of law and it affected social norms and stereotypes.  There was patriarchal religious discourse and religious discourse that promoted gender equality.  States needed to make a choice about the religious discourse used in law and practice. The speaker noted efforts to combat gender stereotypes by changing interpretations of religious texts. 

    Several speakers gave recommendations regarding the content of the general recommendation.  One speaker said it needed to have a multi-layered institutional approach that was cognisant of power relations, while another called for the general recommendation’s scope to be expanded to promote counter narratives to gender stereotypes.  Another recommendation was for full effective and meaningful participation of women and girls to be captured in the general recommendation.

    Panel Discussion

    Representatives of States, United Nations agencies and civil society then took the floor, with speakers, among other things, expressing support for the elaboration of a general recommendation on gender stereotypes that would contribute to eliminating gender stereotypes and their adverse effects on women and girls, and to promoting the rights of all women and girls.

    Many speakers said gender stereotypes impeded the participation of women in all areas of public and private life and subconsciously affected how all behaved.  Stereotypes led to the subordination of women and girls, wage gaps, discrimination and gender-based violence.  They limited the potential of women globally and progress toward Sustainable Development Goal Five.  Women and girls continued to bear the brunt of conflict and climate change.  States had a responsibility to combat these stereotypes.

    Speakers said that in many countries, there was a pushback against feminism, which was misinforming the public and slowing progress. It was imperative to prevent backsliding.  In this context, the United Nations and other international bodies needed to expand, not restrict, definitions of gender, one speaker said.

    Some speakers said that in the digital world, harmful messaging and sexist discourse were affecting women and girls.  Online pornography and prostitution promoted violence against women and perpetuated stereotypes, while online hate speech reinforced gender stereotypes, silenced women’s voices, and limited their political participation.  The Committee needed to examine how gender stereotypes permeated online discourse. Some speakers said that artificial intelligence was perpetuating and amplifying harmful gender stereotypes against women.  Measures needed to be implemented to eliminate gender biases in artificial intelligence.  One speaker called for the promotion of women’s participation in the technological sector.

    Speakers expressed support for the elimination of all harmful stereotypes against women and girls.  All parties needed to cooperate to build a fair and equitable society for women and girls.  Governments needed to recognise the crucial role of civil society organizations in protecting women’s rights and countering stereotypes.  Stereotypes needed to be recognised and countered.  Stakeholders needed to reshape restrictive masculinities and reinforce positive gender norms.  International regional frameworks, including the Convention, needed to be implemented to build a more prosperous future for all.  Encouraging social awareness of stereotypes was crucial in combatting discrimination and promoting equality.

    Some speakers said gender stereotypes were cross-cutting, affecting various marginalised groups.  Intersectionality was a necessary lens for addressing gender stereotypes.  Speakers also called on the Committee to adopt a decolonial approach and embrace indigenous approaches to women’s rights, and consider the rights of lesbian, bisexual, transgender and intersex women and girls.  One speaker said the Committee needed to oppose the patriarchy and contribute to dismantling it.

    The Committee needed to elaborate on biases in gender-based roles and their impact on society, one speaker said.  Another speaker called for the general recommendation to consider the link between stereotypes and women’s unpaid care work. The Committee needed to note the importance of awareness raising campaigns in breaking down stereotypes. One speaker said the general recommendation needed to challenge how gender stereotypes influenced security systems.

    Some speakers said the general recommendation needed to consider the cultural sensitivities of all States parties. Actions and decisions needed to align with States’ unique customs, they said.  One speaker called on the Committee to reflect on the positive influences of culture and religion on promoting women’s rights.

    Speakers presented legislative and policy initiatives to counter gender stereotypes and address intersectional discrimination; promote women’s participation in the workforce, political bodies and education, including in science, technology, engineering and maths education; revise textbooks to remove gender stereotypes; promote the access of women and girls to health and reproductive rights; combat human trafficking; repeal discriminatory laws; collect data on the prevalence of gender discrimination; promote the use of parental leave and the participation of men in care work; and empower vulnerable women.

    One speaker asked the Committee whether the general recommendation would consider the connection between unilateral coercive measures and gender stereotypes.

    Closing Remarks

    ANTTI KORKEAKIVI, Chief, Human Rights Treaties Branch, United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, expressed gratitude to all speakers for their invaluable contributions.  The dialogue had demonstrated how deeply gender stereotypes affected women and girls in all aspects of life.  The general recommendation had the potential to dismantle gender stereotypes and help women and girls to realise their potential.  The inputs of all stakeholders would inform the Committee’s efforts to elaborate the general recommendation.  The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights looked forward to the positive impact that the general recommendation would have on the lives of women and girls globally.

    NAHLA HAIDAR, Committee Chair, said all stakeholders’ inputs had been very valuable.  This general recommendation needed to ensure that no one was excluded from protection. The Committee would consider the Convention’s perspective on intersectionality, which was captured in the Committee’s general recommendation 28.  The current general recommendation needed to meet the requirements of women and girls all over the world.  Speakers had expressed a diversity of views on the subject, and the Committee would consider all these views.  In closing, Ms. Haidar thanked all speakers that had participated in the meeting, including more than 40 States parties.

    ___________

    CEDAW.25.052E

    Produced by the United Nations Information Service in Geneva for use of the information media; not an official record.

    English and French versions of our releases are different as they are the product of two separate coverage teams that work independently.

    MIL OSI United Nations News

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: Security Council Renews Sudan Sanctions Panel, Adopting Resolution 2772 (2025) by 13 Votes in Favour, 2 Abstentions

    Source: United Nations 4

    The Security Council today extended until 12 March 2026 the mandate of the Panel of Experts tasked with assisting its Sanctions Committee concerning Sudan, requesting a final report on the Panel’s findings and recommendations by 13 January 2026.

    Adopting resolution 2772 (2025) (to be issued as document S/RES/2772(2025)) by a vote of 13 in favour to none against, with 2 abstentions (China, Russian Federation), the Council — acting under Chapter VII of the Charter of the United Nations — also requested the Panel to provide the Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolution 1591 (2005) concerning Sudan with an interim report on its activities no later than 12 August.

    Further, the Council requested the Panel to provide updates regarding its activities to that Committee every three months, also expressing its intention to review the Panel’s mandate and take appropriate action regarding its further extension no later than 12 February 2026. It also encouraged all parties, Member States and international, regional and subregional organizations to ensure continued cooperation with the Panel, as well as the safety of its members.

    Speaking after the vote, the representative of the United States — the text’s main author — emphasized that the Panel’s independent reporting will facilitate both Member States’ support for Sudan and “efforts to reach a lasting resolution to a conflict that has caused the world’s largest humanitarian crisis”.  The Panel’s reporting provides unique information crucial to stemming the flow of arms and funds, stopping the fighting and supporting a civilian-led political alternative to both the Sudanese Armed Forces and the Rapid Support Forces, he added.

    Condemning the Rapid Support Forces’ recent attack on the Zamzam refugee camp in Darfur, the representative of the United Kingdom similarly underlined the continued importance of the Panel’s reporting. While welcoming the renewal of the Panel’s mandate, she said that her delegation would have preferred to retain previous language that called on the parties to cease violations of international law and condemned attacks against civilians.  She stressed:  “It is vital that this Council remain focused on protecting civilians in Sudan, given the violence being committed against so many.”

    Several Council members expressed regret that their proposal to align the extension of the Panel of Experts’ mandate with the sanctions measures imposed on Darfur was not taken on board, noting that the former’s mandate extends beyond the latter’s expiration in September.

    “This misalignment, unique to the sanctions regime in Darfur, must be addressed by the Council,” said the representative of Guyana — also speaking for Algeria, Sierra Leone and Somalia.  Nevertheless, they voted in favour of the resolution to reaffirm their continued support for the Panel of Experts, she said, expressing concern over escalating violence, arms flows and child recruitment in Sudan.

    “These developments reinforce the need for sustained monitoring and reporting by the Panel of Experts to keep the Council informed and engaged.”  However, conflict resolution requires a range of tools, and sanction measures alone have not been universally effective in restoring international peace and security.  “There must be a clear and defined pathway for the eventual lifting of sanctions, with periodic evaluations to ensure they serve their intended purpose without causing unintended consequences,” she said.

    Pakistan’s representative also expressed regret that “another opportunity was missed to align the reporting period of the Panel of Experts with that of the sanctions regime in Darfur”, pointing to the author’s “inflexibility to accommodate a six-month extension of the Panel with an automatic extension of 12 months”.  He also voiced concern that the resolution was put to the vote without accommodating the views of all Member States.

    Echoing that, the representative of the Russian Federation said that it is “unacceptable” that the Panel has been instructed to draft reports beyond the timeline of the sanctions regime itself.  “Even any hints” of extending that regime beyond Darfur is also unacceptable, he stressed, as these measures — introduced 20 years ago — “have not benefitted the Sudanese in any way”.  He added that the Panel’s activities must be impartial, “rather than using the mandate as a battering ram against the interests of the Sudanese people and Government”.

    The representative of China, Council President for February, then spoke in his national capacity to observe that the misalignment between the renewal cycles for the Panel’s mandate and the relevant sanctions regime has existed for some time — not because of the complexity of the issue, but fundamentally a lack of political will.  “The solution is quite simple,” he said, pointing out that either the Panel’s mandate or the sanctions regime itself could be extended, once, for six months.

    MIL OSI United Nations News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Governor Stein Provides Updates as North Carolina Prepares for Winter Weather

    Source: US State of North Carolina

    Headline: Governor Stein Provides Updates as North Carolina Prepares for Winter Weather

    Governor Stein Provides Updates as North Carolina Prepares for Winter Weather
    lsaito

    Raleigh, NC

    Today, Governor Stein provided updates as North Carolina prepares for winter weather this week. Governor Stein is advising North Carolinians to plan ahead for snow, ice, and strong winds, and to follow safety guidance from local officials.  

    “As North Carolinians brace for another winter storm this week, we encourage all North Carolinians to listen to their local weather forecast and have a plan to stay safe,” said Governor Josh Stein. “We are monitoring the situation closely and have activated the State Emergency Response Team. I am mobilizing the Department of Transportation, the North Carolina National Guard, and the State Highway Patrol. Our utilities and local officials are also preparing. Our most important goal is to keep North Carolinians safe this week.” 

    “This winter storm will affect much of the state with winter weather, which will impact roadways and possibly cause power outages in areas where significant ice accumulates,” said Director of Emergency Management Will Ray. “The State Emergency Response Team remains in close coordination with our local communities, state agencies, and utility partners to quickly address any needs. Please limit your travel and stay off the roads to allow NCDOT and first responders to work safely.” 

    The State Emergency Response Team is activated this morning and is ready to respond. The State Emergency Operations Center and Regional Coordination Centers remain in close communication with local emergency management officials to ensure that all resources are available and ready to quickly respond to any needs that arise.    

    The North Carolina National Guard (NCNG) remains a ready force, prepared to support our state in times of need. NCNG leadership has communicated to the force the possibility of inclement winter weather in the coming days, and our Soldiers and Airmen are actively preparing to respond when called. 

    Officials with the N.C. Department of Transportation are preparing for potentially hazardous travel. Maintenance crews in NCDOT highway divisions from the mountains to the coast have started spreading a saltwater mixture called brine on interstates and plan to continue with other highways and primary routes before moving to secondary roads throughout Monday and Tuesday. Brine helps prevent ice from bonding to the pavement. The agency has about 2,500 specially trained employees and contract crews, and hundreds of trucks that can be equipped with plows and spreaders used to pretreat roads and remove snow and ice after a storm hits.  

    The probability is increasing that a winter storm will impact much of North Carolina Wednesday and into Thursday. The eventual track and strength of a low-pressure system will determine precipitation types and amounts. With the current forecast, the best chance for accumulating snow is across the mountains and northern portions of central and eastern North Carolina. Impactful ice accumulations may be possible for portions of central and eastern North Carolina. With any ice accumulations of a quarter of an inch or greater, tree limbs can snap, and power outages may occur. It is important that all North Carolinians remain weather aware over the next day as the forecast will change and be fine-tuned as we get closer to Wednesday.  

    To prepare for winter weather, North Carolina Emergency Management officials recommend these tips: 

    • Pay close attention to your local forecast and be prepared for what’s expected in your area. Use a National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration weather radio or a weather alert app on your phone to receive emergency weather alerts.  

    • Stock up on water and non-perishable food. 

    • Keep cell phones, mobile devices, and spare batteries charged. 

    • Stay home and off the roads if you can. 

    • Dress warmly if you go outside. Wear multiple layers of thin clothing instead of a single layer of thick clothing.  

    • Store an emergency kit in your vehicle in case you must travel. Include scraper, jumper cables, tow chain, sand/salt, blankets, flashlight, first-aid kit, and road map.  

    • Gather emergency supplies for your pet including leash and feeding supplies, enough food for several days, and a pet travel carrier.  

    • Do not leave pets outside for long periods of time during freezing weather.  

    • Check in on your friends and neighbors, especially the elderly, during winter weather. 

    If your power goes out: 

    • Only operate generators outside and away from open windows or doors to prevent carbon monoxide poisoning.  

    • Never burn charcoal indoors or use a gas grill indoors. 

    • Properly vent kerosene heaters. 

    • Use battery-powered sources for light, instead of candles, to reduce the risk of fire. 

    Feb 17, 2025

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Governor Stein Announces $102 Million Expansion for Domestic Transformer Manufacturer in Raeford

    Source: US State of North Carolina

    Headline: Governor Stein Announces $102 Million Expansion for Domestic Transformer Manufacturer in Raeford

    Governor Stein Announces $102 Million Expansion for Domestic Transformer Manufacturer in Raeford
    lsaito

    Raleigh, NC

    Today, Governor Josh Stein announced a major expansion for Pennsylvania Transformer Technology, LLC (PTT), a domestic manufacturer of power and distribution transformers, to add 217 new jobs in Hoke County. The company will invest more than $102.5 million to expand its manufacturing footprint in the City of Raeford.

    “PTT’s expansion is an outstanding economic development win for Hoke County and the entire state of North Carolina,” said Governor Josh Stein. “North Carolina is home to the largest manufacturing workforce in the Southeast and a central East Coast location, setting up our rural communities for more success.”

    Headquartered in Canonsburg, Pennsylvania, with a nearly-century-old history, PTT is a leading domestic manufacturer of power and distribution transformers for the electric utility, municipal power, renewable energy and industrial markets. With plans to build an additional 300,000 square feet across two new state-of-the-art facilities in Raeford, PTT’s expansion is designed to increase its manufacturing capacity of transformers in the United States and contribute to reducing domestic supply chain shortages of critical transformer equipment. 

    “We built our first factory in Hoke County, North Carolina back in 1992 and have been proudly manufacturing power transformers in this community for over 30 years,” said Sandeep Chakravarty, President of PTT. “We are thrilled to further invest in and expand our operations in Hoke County. This new state-of-the-art facility will not only enhance our production capacity, it will provide economic benefits to the community by creating additional well-paying, high-quality jobs and more broadly, contribute to the country’s economic growth and the energy transition.” 

    “This major investment is more proof that North Carolina is indeed the best state to do business,” said N.C. Commerce Secretary Lee Lilley. “When companies that currently operate in our state reinvest here, it validates our efforts to provide a quality pool of skilled talent, and business friendly environment where companies can grow and thrive.” 

    While salaries for the new positions will vary, the average annual salary is expected to be $64,949, exceeding the Hoke County average of $42,659. These new jobs could create a potential positive aggregate annual payroll impact of more than $14 million to the local economy.

    A performance-based grant of $800,000 from the One North Carolina Fund will support the company’s expansion in Hoke County. The OneNC Fund provides financial assistance to local governments to help attract economic investment and to create jobs. Companies receive no money upfront and must meet job creation and capital investment targets to qualify for payment. All OneNC grants require a matching participation from local governments and any award is contingent upon that condition being met.

    “This is outstanding news for Raeford and Hoke County,” said N.C. Senator Danny Earl Britt, Jr. “These new jobs and millions of investments are the right sparks to energize our community, and our people stand ready to support the company in its next phase of growth.

    “PTT has been a fantastic corporate citizen in Raeford for more than 30 years,” said N.C. Representative Garland E. Pierce. “This continued partnership gives us a great vote of confidence in our ability to support such a transformative company as they execute its strategic plan for decades to come.”

    In addition to the North Carolina Department of Commerce and the Economic Development Partnership of North Carolina, other key partners in this project include the North Carolina General Assembly, North Carolina Department of Transportation and its Rail Division, North Carolina Community College System, North Carolina Railroad Company, Aberdeen & Rockfish Railroad, Golden LEAF Foundation, North Carolina’s Southeast, Hoke County, Raeford/Hoke Economic Development, City of Raeford, and Piedmont Natural Gas. 

    Feb 17, 2025

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Security: Recycling old Radium into Cancer Drugs

    Source: International Atomic Energy Agency – IAEA

    An IAEA expert mission was deployed to Suva, Fiji, to support the recovery and transportation of radium-226 to the USA, where the sources will be used as a feedstock to produce actinium-225, an alpha-emitting isotope which is increasingly used in targeted cancer treatments. IAEA supports countries in managing legacy radium-226 sources under the IAEA’s Global Radium Management Initiative.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: Text of Vice-President’s Address at Indian Institutes of Science Education and Research (IISER), Mohali (Excerpts)

    Source: Government of India

    Posted On: 17 FEB 2025 6:48PM by PIB Delhi

    Good afternoon all of you. If there has been some disruption in your normal activity, because as Vice-President of the country, I take it as my prime obligation to connect with young minds and important institutions. It is from that perspective I solicited this invitation.

    I am grateful that it was accepted. Professor Anil Kumar Tripathi, Director IISER, a man who brings on the table huge experience, commitment, and in his brief address he has revealed the object, the performance and the potential. Professor Renu Vig, Vice-Chancellor, Punjab University, has two distinctions.

    One, she is the first ever woman Vice-Chancellor of the Punjab University, a very prestigious university. I am sure we can applaud her, and, she is the 14th Vice-Chancellor, appointed by a Chancellor, who happens to be the 14th Vice-President of the country, that’s myself. Both of us missed number 13 very narrowly. Professor R.P. Tiwari, Vice-Chancellor, Central University of Punjab. Have you noticed something unique here? There are three Vices. So, Professor Anil Kumar Tripathi can be happy and delighted. Unless he says that prefix of Vice does not mean vice as it is defined in the dictionary, I would not reflect upon myself. But I can assure you, Vice-Chancellor Renu Vig and Vice-Chancellor R.P. Tiwari have no Vices.

    This is a unique Institution and 7 being in number. Having been Governor in the State of West Bengal for three years, I am aware of these Institutions and the seminal role they play in the evolution of the heart. Every institution is defined by the faculty, and I greet members of the faculty who are very distinguished and are futuristic in their outlook, whatever little I have gathered. We as a nation can take pride that we have an unparalleled legacy unknown to other nations. That long, and if we traverse our civilisational journey of 5000 years, we will find Bharat had been glory of the world,epicenter of knowledge and culture. People from all over the world flocked in pursuit of knowledge. That is your motto. What a motto you have picked up. Nalanda, Taxila, people came from all over the world in search of knowledge, shared knowledge and wisdom.

    We at the moment are at a very critical juncture, and I say so with some amount of nostalgia. I got into the seat of governance 35 years ago when I was elected to Parliament (Lok Sabha) and had the good fortune to be a Minister. I know the situation there. The mood of the nation. Our worrisome foreign exchange disturbed Jammu and Kashmir. I saw it all around, and our government didn’t last long, not because of me. And what I see now, 180 degree difference. The nation has an environment of hope and possibility. Our global image is very high.

    Leadership of the Prime Minister is globally acknowledged. And we have traversed against heavy winds. Difficult terrain. From fragile five economies to the world’s largest five economies at the moment. Ahead of those who ruled us for centuries, the Great Britain. It is a matter of time. That we will be marching ahead of Japan and Germany also to be the third largest in about a year or so. Such a jump. When I was elected first in parliament I had no courage to dream. Then that was the time, young boys and girls, where a Member of Parliament felt really an authority because he or she could give 50 gas connections or 50 telephone connections in a year. Imagine where we have come. In the shortest possible time, 550 million people of the country benefited from banking inclusions. They never had that account.

    Over 100 million households have toilets. Cooking gas in every house, electricity in every house, internet in every remote corner, health centres and education centres around, road connectivity, everything is happening. World class infrastructure we are seeing of global benchmark, and therefore, as I said this morning also, no nation in the world has grown as fast in the last 10 years as Bharat. This has created a challenge. A challenge of aspirational youth. They want more. They are entitled to more because they have tasted development. They see it on the ground. They know that per capita internet consumption of India is more than that of US and China taken together, that speaks of our access to technology and adaptability of technology.

    When it comes to direct transfers, a service delivery driven by technology, our direct digital transactions are four times the combined transactions of USA, UK, France and Germany. We are a nation where global entities, International Monetary Fund, World Bank are appreciating us. I recall my days in 1990 as a minister.

    Our gold had to be shipped in an aeroplane to be placed to two banks in Switzerland because our foreign exchange was around 1 billion US dollars. Now it is 700 times. And not a cause of concern, and therefore, the challenge is how do we meet aspirations of our young minds and my message to young minds. Seriously, look around, the opportunity basket which for you is getting larger and larger by the day. Come out of these silos and groove that are defined jobs only with the government or working in a corporate.

    Startups, unicorns are doing wonders. Let me tell you, IITs and IIMs have given these unicorns. But about 50% are from other institutes. I know the potential this country has because I have been to ISRO. Seen for myself. I have seen emerging space economy, there I came to learn for the first time when our rocket had to be put in space. It was not from Indian soil, and now we put rockets of other countries, USA also, developed countries also, Singapore also, from our and make money. Good value for money. Chandrayaan, Gaganyaan – They are defining us.

    I had the good occasion to have discussion with S. Somnathan, ISRO chairman, he was till recently, now V. Narayanan. Their fire, their zeal, their commitment, very different. In Bangalore, Govindan Rangarajan, Indian Institute of Science, and Dr. Clyde Shelby. I had the occasion to see personally what kind of innovations are being done for larger public welfare by scientific and industrial research. I say so because a country’s reputation, image, power is to be defined by research.

    Research is the bedrock of economic supremacy and global distinction. There was a time when we did not bestow attention on research and we thought somebody will give it to us with a price. And that someone will decide how much to give, on what terms to give but now, we have changed that. Nations that lead in research have global respect in economy, in strategy. And countries depend on them. Just imagine how far we have gone when it comes to meteorological predictions. We are one of the best in the world. As Governor-General of West Bengal, and the state is prone to cyclones, super cyclones, there was no mortality on high seas. The prediction was very accurate. Scientific prowess defines strategic prowess. Conventional wars are gone.

    And we have an ancient legacy of having been researchers, discoverers, giving to the world right from zero in arithmetic or mathematics. Aryabhatta, Brahmagupta laid foundations of global mathematics. Our scientific pantheon, Raman known by Raman effect, Bose, Sarabhai, Chandrasekhar, Shah, Bhatnagar, and our former president, they define India’s research mind, orientation. They exemplify commitment to research. And look at those days, we were in colonial shackles. Raman effect discovered against colonial scepticism.

    It stands as a testament to our Indian scientific beliefs. Cutting edge research is demand of the times. And the research has to correlate to fulfil the needs of the society. A research that is to be put on the shelf, a research that is for the self, a research that embellishes the profile, a research that contributes only to credentials is not the research. A research that only scratches the surface is not the research. The research has to be authentic.

    The research must create a wave. It must have positive, cascading impact on the lives of the people. Industries, business, trade and commerce are driven by research. At the moment, boys and girls, we are living in times we never imagined. You are facing those times as much as I am doing. We call them Artificial Intelligence, Internet of Things, Blockchain, Machine Learning and the kind. Blockchain for some may be Blockchain. Machine Learning may be Machine Learning only. But look at the power these technologies have.

    And these technologies are known as disruptive technologies. But these technologies come with enormous challenges that can uproot us. But they come also with a basket of opportunities. And we must focus on unleashing opportunity out of these disruptive technologies. Our research has to come up to that mark. It is our good fortune that the government is alive to the situation.

    And we as a nation, home to one sixth of humanity, are at the moment focussing on these technologies. Our quantum computing. There is a reflection by the director. About 6 lakh or 8 lakh jobs will be created out of investment of 6 lakh crores. Quantum computing, there is allocation of 6,000 crores and 18,000 crores for green hydrogen mission. These are the opportunities for you people. Space economy, blue economy. These are the opportunities for you.

    And therefore research has to facilitate life of the ordinary person. To improve our industry, our administration. A nation of 1.4 billion and a rich human resource unrivalled in the world. If it is catalysed and activated by temperament of research, the results will be exponential, geometric and revolutionary. Because now Bharat is no longer a nation with a potential. Our rise is unstoppable for last few years.

    It is incremental. And therefore, there has to be a greater commitment that research in the country is in the big league, in the Platinum category. And for that, the faculty has to brainstorm. We cannot have satisfying moments. As reflected by a Greek philosopher much before Socrates’ era, Heraclitus, Boys and Girls, now we are having change every moment. Paradigm shift.

    We are virtually at an industrial revolution. Unknown to the humanity before. And if nations have to go ahead of others, we have to focus on research. There was a time in Silicon Valley otherwise we could hardly see an Indian. And there is now hardly a global corporate that doesn’t have an Indian man or woman at the peak. Our demographic dividend now requires universalist engineering, mathematics. And that is why, after more than three decades, a game-changing education policy was introduced. And that was to give you enough room so that you can go after your aptitude and distance from the package of just degrees.

    I will take the occasion to appeal to corporates that they must come forward to drive the engines of research. Liberally contribute because ultimately they are the beneficiaries. Alongside the government they should be making liberal contributions beyond their CSR funds. If you look at the global corporates, how much they invest you will be surprised. We take pride in the last five years. We have increased our research fiscal commitment in the corporates to 50% above.

    From 0.89% of their revenue to 1.32% of their revenue. I find it deficient. Investment has to be many times more. We take pride also because earlier things were not moving. Now things are moving. When things are moving, we notice a change. Patents have nearly more than doubled in the last ten years. But our patents must be in consonance with our demographic participation in the world. One-sixth we must have. Because we are one-sixth of humanity. And this one-sixth of humanity qualitatively is very different than one-sixth. And therefore, taking note of technology access and adaptability, we need to be in optimal performance mindset.

    Imagine a country where 100 million farmers, three times a year, get direct banking transfers. Young boys and girls were not aware, there was a time when corruption was the password for opportunity, recruitment or business licence. Power corridors were leveraged by lies and agents. All this neutralised. And neutralised also through technological applications. Because middlemen have been shown the door. So when I look at your institute, Director, science, education and research, the triangle, this defines your role. Pursuit of knowledge. It starts with education. Because education as a transformative vehicle is very powerful. It brings about equality. Any one of you can have unicorn and be in the big league of industry. You don’t have to look to the situation. That yes, my father was in the industry, that’s true. We need to fight by technology. That’s the sin we are facing. So education. In education, science is important.

    Because science unfolds your mind to generate creativity, innovation. And then the next step is research. A combination of these will unlock the enormous potential of Indian mind. Will make available avenues and vistas to our population. Every nation hopes to be self-reliant. But we as a nation are very large. Complex on occasions. When the nation is growing so fast, some of us, the number is very small. The traction is large. Put personal interest, commercial interest, political interest, above national interest. This can’t be allowed. This is unfair to boys and girls.

    This is unfair to everyone, because if in our democracy there is someone as a class more serious, significant stakeholder in democracy and growth, than any one of us sitting here, is the youth of the country. Because as we march for Viksit Bharat after 2047, you are the driving force behind engines of growth. And therefore we have to give new dimension now. Make in India, start up India. And look at technology. It has to get into healthcare.

    Technology has to get into education. Technology can catalyse that quality health and quality education is available to one and all. And if that happens, Bharat will be what it has been for centuries.Our lean period started in 12th century. Then marauders came, invaders came, recklessly destroyed our culture. They sacrileged our religious places to an extent that they put their own at the same place. Then came the Britishers who did not give us the education to rule ourselves. They gave us education and taught us history as suited to them. Now things have changed. We are much ahead of UK in economy. We have a bunch of institutions now all over the country. IITs, IIMs, Institutions like yours, and therefore we must have this ecosystem with ears and eyes on the ground. The litmus test is changing the life of the ordinary man. We all stand committed to that because that is our preamble.

    We the people of India want these things. I conclude for time constraint. What Vivekananda said, “Arise, awake, stop not till the goal is achieved”. A motto which you must have. From my side I can give it to you. Have no tension, Have no stress, Never fear failure. Failure is natural. Sometimes you will be surprised, Oh he has succeeded, he should not have succeeded, take it in stride. System is transparent, there will be aberrations. Sometimes you will find, Oh! my own success is unjustified. These are situations natural to us, and then Dr. Kalam whose heart was always in education. I recollect when he met his maker. He was with the students in the North East, and what he said I quote,

    “Dreams transform into thoughts, and thoughts result in action” and therefore my ultimate plea with you, If an idea occurs to you don’t allow your mind to be a parking ground for that idea because you fear you may fail. Get rid of it. Failure is a myth because there is no one who has not failed but they never took failure as failure. Chandrayaan 2 was failure for some who are critics, who are recipe for negativity. Chandrayaan II did not fail, It went that far, and Chandrayaan III did the rest. Let your innovations catalyse India’s scientific renaissance, and advance human progress because we are a country that believes in ‘Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam’ – One Earth, One Family, One Future, that was our motto to the entire world.

    Once again, I am grateful to the Director for making available this opportunity to me at a very short notice. I understand that there has been some inconvenience, I would urge that you overlook it.
    Thank you so much.

    *****

    JK/RC/SM

    (Release ID: 2104169) Visitor Counter : 15

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: India Energy Week 2025

    Source: Government of India

    India Energy Week 2025

    Driving Global Energy Innovation and Collaboration for a Sustainable Future

    Posted On: 17 FEB 2025 6:47PM by PIB Delhi

    India is driving not only its growth but also the growth of the world, with the energy sector playing a significant role.

    -Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi

    A Global Energy Confluence

    India Energy Week (IEW) 2025, held from February 11 to 14, 2025, at the Yashobhoomi Convention Centre, New Delhi, is a premier global event in the energy sector. The event held under the patronage of the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas and organized by the Federation of Indian Petroleum Industry (FIPI) has grown into the world’s second-largest energy conference.

    A Hub of Innovation and Transformation

    The India Energy Week exhibition has grown exponentially to become the world’s new meeting place for energy professionals, with millions of dollars of business conducted onsite, positioning it at the very heart of international business.

    A key facilitator of dialogue between international and regional producers, the event provides international exhibitors with the opportunity to network with key buyers from over 120 countries across the full energy value chain. Exhibitors will have the opportunity to showcase cutting-edge technologies that drive sustainable energy solutions, forge strategic partnerships, and explore opportunities to shape the future of energy.

    Defining Achievements of IEW 2025

     Key Focus Areas of IEW 2025

    • Energy Transition & Green Future: Major focus on biofuels, flex-fuel vehicles, ethanol blending, and green hydrogen. India is steadily progressing toward its goal of producing 5 million metric tons (MMT) of green hydrogen annually by 2030.
    • Exploration & Production (E&P) Reforms: Launch of Open Acreage Licensing Program (OALP) Round X, covering 200,000 sq. km, along with regulatory changes to boost investment in oil and gas exploration.
    • India-US Energy Cooperation: Strengthening LNG supply partnerships and increasing natural gas consumption in India’s energy mix from 6% to 15%.
    • Global Energy Investments: Expanding investments in oil and gas assets across Brazil, Venezuela, Russia, and Mozambique while benefiting from emerging oil sources.
    • Startup & Innovation Recognition: The Avinya’25 – Energy Startup Challenge, led by the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, awarded innovative startups for breakthroughs in CO₂ capture, ESG solutions, and renewable energy. The Vasudha – Oil and Gas Startup Challenge recognized overseas startups revolutionizing the upstream oil and gas sector with AI-driven solutions.

    Navigating the Nine Thematic Zones

    IEW 2025 introduced nine thematic zones, each focusing on different aspects of the energy sector:

    1. Hydrogen Zone – Hosted by Oil India Limited, showcasing cutting-edge innovations in hydrogen fuel generation.
    2. Biofuels Zone – Highlighting India’s advancements in Biodiesel, Bioethanol, Compressed Biogas, and Sustainable Aviation Fuel.
    3. Renewable Energy Zone – Featuring innovations in solar, wind, and other renewable energy technologies.
    4. LNG EcoSystem – Hosted by Petronet LNG, focusing on India’s downstream LNG supply chain and eco-friendly fuel solutions.
    5. Make in India Zone – Hosted by Engineers India Limited, highlighting indigenous energy manufacturing capabilities.
    6. City Gas Distribution Zone – Hosted by GAIL, emphasizing India’s rapid progress towards a gas-based economy.
    7. Petrochem Zone – Hosted by ONGC, showcasing advancements in petrochemical technologies and sustainable solutions.
    8. Innovation Zone – Featuring emerging startups and breakthrough technologies in energy.
    9. Digitalisation Zone – Showcasing AI, IoT, and automation in optimizing energy production and distribution.

    India: The Rising Energy Powerhouse

    India, the world’s third-largest energy consumer, is poised for the highest energy demand growth. Under PM Narendra Modi’s leadership, the nation is advancing towards a greener future with significant investments in secure, sustainable, and affordable energy. India Energy Week 2025 will serve as a key platform for global collaboration, driving discussions on energy security, innovation, and sustainability.

     

    A dynamic energy landscape

    India’s Path to Sustainability

    As a rapidly advancing economic powerhouse, India faces the twin challenge of surging energy demand while mitigating its carbon footprint. In response, Hon’ble Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi launched the concept of “Panchamrit” at COP 26, representing a blend of five essential elements. “Panchamrit” underscores India’s commitment to addressing climate change and fostering sustainable growth on a global scale.

    Panchamrit: India’s Five Point Pledge Towards Climate Change

    1. India will take its non-fossil energy capacity to 500 GW by 2030
    2. By 2030, India will reduce the carbon intensity of its economy by less than 45%
    3. India will meet 50% of its energy requirements from renewable energy by 2030
    4. By the year 2070, India will achieve target of net-zero
    5. India will reduce the total projected carbon emissions by one billion tonnes till 2030

    Conclusion

    India Energy Week 2025 serves as a pivotal platform for global energy stakeholders to exchange ideas, foster partnerships, and witness India’s leadership in energy transition. As Shri Pankaj Jain, Secretary, Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, highlighted, IEW 2025 will act as a catalyst for groundbreaking projects in green hydrogen, solar advancements, and exploration technologies, reinforcing India’s commitment to sustainability and innovation. With a focus on transformative collaboration and investment, the event will shape the global energy agenda, positioning India at the forefront of energy security, technological progress, and a sustainable future.

    References

    Download in PDF

    ***

    Santosh Kumar/ Sarla Meena/ Anchal Patiyal

    (Release ID: 2104168) Visitor Counter : 19

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-OSI USA: RIDOH Launches New Map of Lead Drinking Water Pipes

    Source: US State of Rhode Island

    As part of the process of replacing all lead service lines in Rhode Island’s public water systems by 2033, the Rhode Island Department of Health has launched a new, interactive map of drinking water service lines (pipes) in the state.

    This new dashboard shows if service lines are made of lead, non-lead, or unknown material. Rhode Islanders can check the material of both the public side of the service line and the private side of the service line on their property. Visit the dashboard (see link below).

    This tool is a follow-up to the notification that public water systems sent to residents and business owners in late 2024 if they receive water through service lines made of lead or unknown material. These notices provided people with recommendations to limit any potential exposure to lead in their drinking water.

    “Just having a lead service line does not mean that there is lead in your drinking water. Public water systems take many steps to keep drinking water safe from lead, including treatment that reduces corrosion and routine testing, with a focus on homes with lead service lines,” said Director of Health Jerry Larkin, MD. “However, the replacement of all lead service lines in Rhode Island is an important additional step in making Rhode Island’s drinking water as healthy and safe as possible.”

    While lead exposure from paint remains the most significant public health challenge associated with lead, the Rhode Island Lead Poisoning and Prevention Act requires all lead service lines to be replaced by 2033. It also required public water systems to systematically collect and submit information to RIDOH about the material of all service lines in their distribution systems for the first time. After these inventories were done in 2024, public water systems sent out their notices.

    About lead

    Lead service lines were commonly used in the early 1900s. The use of lead pipes for new construction was banned in 1986. As the plumbing gets old, the material of the pipes can wear away (called corrosion), and lead can get into the drinking water. Public water systems are required to control potential corrosion, which prevents lead from getting into the drinking water. Lead levels are routinely monitored through sampling at residents’ taps, with a focus on homes with lead service lines. This testing is to ensure that what a public water system is doing to prevent lead corrosion is working. Water systems must notify customers of any exceedance of the lead action level.

    There is no safe level of lead, especially for younger children. Talk to your healthcare professional to be sure your child is receiving their routine blood lead screenings. After learning a child has a high blood lead level, RIDOH can provide non-medical case management support and help parents find and remove the source of lead. Learn more about protecting children from lead and lead screenings at health.ri.gov/lead.

    What to do if you have a lead service line or service line of an unknown material

    As was outlined in the notices sent by public water systems, customers with lead service lines or service lines of unknown material can request free water pitchers to filter drinking water for lead. They can also request six months of replacement filters from their public water system. Public water systems are in the process of distributing a free pitcher to people who have requested them. Pitchers with filters are also available at retail stores.

    Public water systems are working with customers with service lines of unknown materials to determine the material and if they need to be replaced. They may need to access a property to inspect the service line. Public water systems will contact property owners and request permission for this work. People who do not have service lines made of lead or unknown materials were not contacted. If you are not sure if you have a lead service line, contact your water system or use RIDOH’s new dashboard to check.

    About Lead Service Line Replacement in Rhode Island

    Replacing all lead service lines in Rhode Island is a complex process that will take several years.

    Under the Rhode Island Lead Poisoning Prevention Act, private side service lines must be replaced at no cost to the customer, provided project funding is available. The Drinking Water State Revolving Loan Fund (DWSRF) and the Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation (WIIN) Act’s Small, Underserved, and Disadvantaged Communities grant are currently the main sources of funding that water systems may use to replace service lines. For fiscal years 2023 through 2027, the DWSRF has an estimated $302 million available that could be used to replace service lines. Of that amount, approximately $143 million dollars are specifically for service line inventory work and lead service line replacements.

    Contact your public water system to learn about their plans and timelines for lead service line replacement. If you do not know what your public water system is, consult your water bill.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Lack of protection for Italian investments in Colombia and obligations under the EU-Colombia trade agreement – E-002753/2024(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The EU-Colombia trade agreement[1] does not include investment protection commitments that could provide a basis for EU investors to request arbitration or other related dispute settlement procedure.

    At present such procedures are only available to French and Spanish investors under bilateral investment treaties concluded by their respective Member States with Colombia.

    The Commission has not been made aware of similar difficulties faced by Italian investors, although affected investors may choose not to disclose such information.

    The Commission expects that Colombia will treat EU investors fairly, so that both sides can reap the maximum benefits of the EU-Colombia trade agreement.

    The EU Delegation in Bogota in cooperation with national authorities is closely monitoring the situation of protection of Member States’ investments in Colombia.

    • [1] Trade agreement between the EU and Colombia of 26 June 2012, published in the Official Journal of the European Union on 24 December 2016 (L 356), https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ%3AL%3A2016%3A356%3ATOC
    Last updated: 17 February 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Inner city spruce up planned for State Highway 1, Wellington CBD

    Source: New Zealand Transport Agency

    State Highway 1, Karo Drive in the Wellington CBD will be getting some much-needed TLC next week.

    Mark Owen, Regional Manager Lower North Island / Top of the South, say it will be the latest piece of urban State Highway 1 in the capital to feel the benefits of the state highway summer maintenance programme.

    “People heading in and out of the city will have seen the work we have done on the urban motorway. The highway route through the city is another well used road, and that is why the northbound lanes of Karo Drive between Taranaki and Victoria Streets are our next priority.”

    “Over 25,000 use this stretch of highway daily. The more a road is used, the more important maintaining it is,” Mr Owen says.

    Road crews will be on the job on the nights of Sunday, 23 February, and Monday 24 February, between 9 pm and 4:30 am, weather permitting. There will be noise disruption throughout the night, but the noisiest part of the work will be done between 9 pm and 11 pm.

    Mr Owen says the timing of the work is carefully chosen.

    “Traffic volumes in Wellington’s CBD are at their busiest during the day, which is why we do this sort of work at night when fewer vehicles are on the road. It inconveniences fewer people and makes the job easier, and safer, to complete.”

    “We will have to close all the northbound lanes on Sunday night, then run lane closures on Monday night. It means there will be just one night where there will be a full directional closure,” Mr Owen says.

    Local road detours will be available for the Sunday night closure, via Taranaki St, Jervois/Waterloo/Aotea Quay to the Aotea Quay Northbound onramp. This will add to travel times and drivers should allow extra time for their journeys.

    Mr Owen appreciates state highway roadworks in the city will cause disruption and delays.

    We ask drivers to please be patient, follow all traffic management in place, while our contractors work hard to get this job finished.”

    Work schedule and Location:

    • Sunday, 23 February. 9 pm to 4:30 am
      • SH1 Karo Drive CLOSED to all northbound traffic between Taranaki  and Victoria Streets
      • Detour available via Taranaki St, Jervois/Waterloo/Aotea Quay to the Aotea Quay Northbound onramp
    • Monday, 24 February. 9 pm to 4:30 am
      • Northbound lane closures, SH1 Karo Drive, between Cuba Street and Willis Street.
      • Victoria Street will be shut at the SH1 intersection
      • Travel delays can be expected
    • These works are weather-dependent and may be rescheduled at short notice.
    • Access will be available for emergency services and affected residents at all times.

    More Information:

    MIL OSI New Zealand News