Category: Americas

  • MIL-OSI USA: Garbarino, Torres Reintroduce Bipartisan Saving Vet Halls Act

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Andrew Garbarino (R-NY)

    WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, Congressman Andrew R. Garbarino (R-NY-02) and Congressman Richie Torres (D-NY-15) announced the reintroduction of the Saving Vet Halls Act, bipartisan legislation to create a grant program addressing the needs of local Veterans Service Organizations (VSOs) as they continue to struggle to keep their facilities open. VSOs such as the American Legion, AMVETS, and Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW) serve as community centers providing crucial services to veterans, servicemembers, dependents, and survivors in our communities, many of which require the use of VSO facilities.

    “Veterans’ halls play an important role in our communities. They connect veterans to the services they’ve earned and give people a place to come together,” said Rep. Garbarino. “These spaces host everything from job fairs to memorials, but too many are being forced to close their doors because of aging infrastructure and limited resources. The Saving Vet Halls Act makes sure Veteran Service Organizations can continue supporting the men and women who served and the communities they live in.”

    “Veterans’ halls are the heartbeats of our communities, where neighbors come together to celebrate life’s milestones and where veterans receive vital support,” said Rep. Torres. “The Saving Vet Halls Act of 2025 recognizes the essential role played by Veteran Service Organizations like the American Legion, AMVETS, and Veterans of Foreign Wars, ensuring they can continue serving those who’ve served us. By creating this $10 million grant program, we’re giving local heroes the tools they need to repair, renovate, and modernize their facilities for the next generation.”

    There are over 100 national Veterans Service Organizations recognized by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) that serve millions of veterans across the country. Too often, these organizations are forced to rely on small fundraisers, volunteer labor, or go without essential repairs due to a lack of dedicated funding. That’s why Congress must act by establishing a federal grant program specifically designed to help VSO posts make critical facility repairs and upgrades.

    The Saving Vet Halls Act of 2025 takes action to alleviate the financial burden on these local Veterans’ Halls so that veterans and their families can continue to rely on them for support. Specifically, this bill would:

    1. Establish a $10 million grant program through the VA that allows local VSOs to apply for grants of up to $75,000 to make necessary infrastructure and technology improvements to keep these buildings open and operational.
    2. Require VSOs to submit plans demonstrating the need for funding as well as the use of such funds to the VA Secretary, who would then prioritize grant allocation based on need and the capacity to complete the project.

    Additional original cosponsors of the Saving Vet Halls Act of 2025 include Representatives Nicole Malliotakis (R-NY-11), Jared Moskowitz (D-FL-23), Nick LaLota (R-NY-1), Don Davis (D-NC-1), Mike Lawler (R-NY-17), Angie Craig (D-MN-2), Brian Fitzpatrick (R-PA-1), Joe Neguse (D-CO-2), and Tom Kean (R-NJ-7)First introduced in 2022, this legislation is endorsed by the American Legion, VFW, and AMVETS.

    “The American Legion proudly supports the Saving Vet Halls Act of 2025. This commonsense legislation recognizes the essential role that local veterans service organizations play in our communities—providing fellowship, outreach, and critical support to those who served. By offering targeted grants to chartered veterans service organizations for facility repairs and technology upgrades, this bill will ensure that posts across the country remain safe, accessible, and equipped to serve future generations of veterans. We thank Congressman Garbarino for his leadership in introducing this important bill and urge Congress to swiftly advance it,” said Mario Marquez, Executive Director of Government Affairs of The American Legion.

    “AMVETS proudly supports the Saving Vet Halls Act of 2025, which would provide critical resources to preserve and modernize local veterans’ halls. These spaces are essential to the well-being and connection of the veteran community, and this bill ensures they remain open and accessible for generations to come,” said Joseph Chenelly, National Executive Director of AMVETS.

    The full text of the bill can be found here

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Feenstra Applauds President Trump for Signing Legislation to Keep Veterans in their Homes

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Randy Feenstra (IA-04)

    HULL, IOWA – Today, U.S. Rep. Randy Feenstra (R-Hull) issued the following statement praising President Trump for signing into law the VA Home Loan Program Reform Act:

    “I thank President Trump for signing into law the VA Home Loan Program Reform Act, which will help keep veterans in their homes and alleviate financial stress. This law ensures that veterans who have fallen on tough times can receive relief on late mortgage payments and avoid foreclosure. Our veterans are true American heroes, and this law represents a small token of our gratitude and appreciation for their service.”

    The U.S. House of Representatives unanimously approved this legislation in May.

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Wyden Calls for Investigation Into Reported Diversion of Resources From Child Exploitation and Human Trafficking Investigations By Department of Homeland Security

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Ron Wyden (D-Ore)

    July 30, 2025

    Washington, D.C. U.S. Senator Ron Wyden, D-Ore., called for an immediate investigation of reports the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has drastically diverted resources away from investigations into serious crimes against children, including child sexual abuse and human trafficking, in order to devote more resources to rounding up immigrants.

    “Instead of locking up rapists, child predators and other violent criminals, Trump appears to be diverting investigators to target cooks, farm workers and students. Congress and the American people will not tolerate the Trump administration ignoring the ongoing sexual abuse of vulnerable children,” wrote Wyden in the letter to DHS Inspector General Joseph Cuffari.

    Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) at DHS is responsible for investigating serious crimes, and is one of the leading agencies charged with investigating child sexual abuse materials online. The 7,000 HSI agents are supposed to focus on investigating drug smuggling, human trafficking, and child sex trafficking, among other crossborder criminal activities. According to DHS, HSI arrested over 3,000 individuals for crimes against children and rescued over 1,000 victims of child exploitation in 2020 alone.

    Wyden’s letter cites a recent report published by the Atlantic, which stated that HSI “supervisors have waved agents off new cases so they have more time to make immigration-enforcement arrests,” and quoted one agent describing the impact: “No drug cases, no human trafficking, no child exploitation.” 

    Wyden has been a staunch advocate in the Senate for increasing resources for investigating sex trafficking and prosecuting predators to protect vulnerable children. In January 2024, Wyden introduced bipartisan legislation to protect children from online exploitation. In June 2024, he released information from his investigation into child abuse and neglect in youth residential treatment facilities across the United States. In September 2024, he urged existing authorities to protect and strengthen services for children susceptible to abuse enrolled in Medicaid in the child welfare program.

    The full text of the letter is here.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Grassley, Crawford Call on Director Patel to Review Untapped Information Ignored by FBI in Clinton Email Investigation

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Iowa Chuck Grassley

    WASHINGTON – Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence Chairman Rick Crawford (R-Ark.) recently sent a letter to Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Director Kash Patel requesting the FBI review unevaluated material related to Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server and mishandling of highly classified information during her time as Secretary of State.

    This untapped and unreviewed information has lived within thumb drives in the FBI’s custody inside a Northern Virginia offshoot office of the FBI’s Washington Field Office since 2018. This letter was sent in response to Chairman Grassley’s efforts to get the appendix to the Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General’s (DOJ OIG) June 2018 report reviewing the DOJ and FBI’s handling of the Clinton investigation, also known as the “Clinton annex,” declassified.

    “The revelations contained in the declassified OIG appendix are at the heart of why the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) became distrusted by so many under your agency’s prior directors: a failure to impartially conduct its law enforcement and intelligence mission. Concerning the issue at hand, Comey’s FBI shockingly failed to review and exploit evidence in its own possession, even though they admitted in written memos the information was necessary to conduct a ‘thorough and complete investigation.’ The FBI also failed to review and exploit other foreign intelligence information,” Grassley and Crawford wrote.

    “Therefore, we now write to stress the importance that this material be immediately dug out from hiding and properly assessed. How evidence which purportedly includes information related to ‘former President Barack Obama’s emails’ and ‘network infrastructure diagrams for U.S. government classified networks,’ remained unreviewed by the preeminent law enforcement agency in the world is mind-numbing. We know you will not similarly ignore evidence in your agency’s possession, no matter where its exploitation or conclusions might lead,” Grassley and Crawford continued.

    Read the full letter HERE.

    Notably, the declassified Clinton Annex revealed that:

    • Russian-language reports were also obtained by the FBI of discussions between then-Democratic National Committee (DNC) head, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, and George Soros’ Open Society Foundations, with suggestions concerning the deletion of evidence on Hillary Clinton’s email servers, mention of FBI’s investigation into the Clinton Foundation, and reports suggesting then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch was in contact with Hillary Clinton’s staff.
    • DOJ OIG also relied on the now-debunked Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) on the Russia collusion hoax during its review, once again shedding light on the damage caused by the ICA’s widely spread tentacles.

    -30-

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Grassley Introduces Bipartisan Legislation to Strengthen FBI Whistleblower Protections

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Iowa Chuck Grassley

    WASHINGTON – Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), co-founder and co-chair of the Whistleblower Protection Caucus, today introduced the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act. Grassley’s legislation is cosponsored by Sen. Gary Peters (D-Mich.).

    “The Biden-Harris administration’s weaponization of the Justice Department and FBI, as well as its egregious retaliation against whistleblowers, caused great damage to our nation’s federal institutions. Multiple agents who bravely blew the whistle had their security clearances suspended and were placed under investigation with no end in sight, leaving them in professional limbo and causing serious financial harm. While the Trump administration has taken significant steps to undo the damage, Congress must offer a solution to ensure future FBI whistleblowers aren’t subjected to a similar retaliatory playbook,” Grassley said. “My legislation will ensure these patriotic whistleblowers receive the protections they deserve, rather than being treated like skunks at a picnic.”

    The bipartisan bill would provide Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) employees with whistleblower protections established by the Grassley-led Whistleblower Protection Act of 1989, and its subsequent amendments. Specifically, the FBI Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act would:

    • Protect FBI whistleblowers who appeal adverse personnel decisions, or who cooperate in whistleblower investigations;
    • Require the Grassley-authored anti-gag provision to be included in FBI nondisclosure policies, forms and agreements to inform employees of their right to report waste, fraud or abuse, including to Congress;
    • Prohibit the FBI from coercing employees to engage in political activity;
    • Clarify which whistleblower disclosures are legally protected;
    • Require the Attorney General to fully inform FBI employees of their whistleblower protection rights, including challenging retaliatory security clearance suspensions;
    • Implement the Government Accountability Office (GAO) 2024 recommendation to clarify the process for FBI whistleblowers to seek corrective action from the Merit Systems Protection Board;
    • Eliminate the requirement that whistleblowers wait a year before challenging the denial, suspension or revocation of their security clearance; and
    • Require the Director of National Intelligence to ensure agency investigations and adjudications of security clearance denials, suspensions and revocations are free from conflicts of interest.

    The FBI Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act is supported by multiple whistleblower advocacy groups, including Empower Oversight and the Government Accountability Project.

    “Senator Grassley’s bill represents the culmination of more than four decades of fighting to ensure that those who protect America’s security have the security to speak truth to power. We urge Congress to pass this legislation swiftly and finally deliver justice that’s been delayed far too long,” said Tom Devine, Legal Director of the Government Accountability Project.

    Read the bill text HERE.

    Background:

    During the 101st Congress, the Grassley-led Whistleblower Protection Act became law, requiring the Attorney General to establish whistleblower protections for FBI employees through regulatory action. However, the Department of Justice (DOJ) refused to implement whistleblower protection regulations until 1997, when then-President Bill Clinton issued a memo requiring them to do so.

    Following concerns of continued retaliation, the Grassley-led Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act of 2012 was signed into law, directing the Attorney General to issue a report reevaluating the 1997 FBI whistleblower protection regulations. Due to the DOJ’s lack of responsiveness, Grassley commissioned the GAO to issue a report, which was published in 2015 and revealed alarming gaps in the FBI’s whistleblower regulations.

    In response to the 2015 GAO report, Grassley introduced the FBI Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act of 2016, which subsequently became law. This legislation directed the FBI to implement modernized whistleblower protection regulations and codified certain FBI whistleblower protections. Despite Grassley’s bill and his call for the FBI to follow the law, the FBI failed to implement these regulations until 2024 – right before the GAO was set to publish a report evaluating the FBI’s implementation of Grassley’s 2016 law. Much like the 2015 report, the 2024 GAO report revealed significant failings in the FBI’s whistleblower protection regulations.

    Given the FBI’s inability over the last 35-years to effectively implement whistleblower protection regulations, as well as the Biden-Harris administration’s pervasive retaliation against whistleblowers, Grassley is now introducing legislation to cement the much-needed protections into law.

    -30-

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Senate Democrat Blocks Five Bipartisan Local Law Enforcement Bills

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Iowa Chuck Grassley

    WASHINGTON – Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) today joined Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto (D-Nev.) on the Senate floor to request unanimous passage of seven bipartisan law enforcement bills, which were passed out of the Judiciary Committee by a unanimous voice vote in May as part of Police Week.

    Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.), a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, objected to Cortez Masto and Grassley’s request to pass the bipartisan law enforcement package. Booker did not previously object to the bills in committee and today objected in an effort to force federal dollars to sanctuary cities that blatantly violate federal immigration law.

    In response to Booker’s objection, Cortez Masto requested unanimous passage of two of the Police Week bills, including the Chief Herbert D. Proffitt Act and the Improving Police CARE Act. Booker allowed these bills to pass, but blocked the five remaining Police Week bills.

    The five local law enforcement bills blocked today include:

    Video and a transcript of Grassley’s remarks regarding the Police Week bills are below.

    [embedded content]

    VIDEO 

    Law enforcement [officers] across the country put their lives on the line every day.

    We see examples of the dangers they face on the news and in our communities on a daily basis.

    This month, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) reported an 830 percent increase in assaults on their officers and agents during the course of their enforcement duties.

    Agents and officers had rocks and other projectiles thrown at them causing injury to persons and property.

    These agents and officers have been doxed and had their home addresses, family member names and other personal information posted on social media for anyone to see, which has resulted in an increased number of threats and intimidation to them.

    We had the opportunity to hear firsthand from three federal law enforcement officers during a Judiciary Committee hearing on cartels last month about the ongoing risks and dangers to law enforcement.

    Special Agent in Charge, Matthew Allen, of the Los Angeles Field Office of DEA testified that his agents are oftentimes surveilled by cartel members and other bad actors.

    He further testified that he has lost several friends and fellow law enforcement officers as a result of their law enforcement duties.

    And just recently, we learned that an off-duty Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officer was shot in the face in New York City during an attempted robbery by a previously deported illegal alien.

    Thankfully, the officer is expected to survive.

    According to the Fraternal Order of Police, as of June 30, 2025, 166 officers were shot in the line of duty. 21 of them were killed.

    While these numbers are lower than from the previous year, the shooting this weekend is yet another example of the threats and dangers our men and women in blue face daily, both on and off duty.

    Earlier this year, Senator Durbin and I led a resolution honoring 234 officers who made the ultimate sacrifice and are being recognized as line-of-duty deaths. It passed with over 80 cosponsors.

    We worked together across the aisle to report these seven bipartisan bills out of committee on Police Week.

    The seven bills are part of the largest Police Week Package in over 15 years.

    The package of seven bills passed the Committee with bipartisan support and unanimous vote.

    They provide a good example of the extensive problems facing our law enforcement community.

    For example, one bill deals with recruitment and retention issues to ensure our law enforcement is well staffed.

    Other bills deal with protecting law enforcement from the dangers of fentanyl and providing law enforcement with the equipment they need to serve our communities.

    Lastly, the bills provide protection to the families of first responders and provide the much-needed resources for the mental health of law enforcement.

    Simply stated, these bills strengthen our law enforcement community to help keep our citizens safe.

    It’s time to send these bills to the House and then to President Trump.

    Each helps law enforcement and first responders across our country.

    These folks are true heroes, and they deserve our strong support.

    -30-

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Grassley: Exhaustive Efforts to Vet Emil Bove’s Nomination Prove He’s Fit for the Job

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Iowa Chuck Grassley

    WASHINGTON – Ahead of the Senate’s vote on the nomination of Emil Bove to be United States Circuit Judge for the Third Circuit, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) released an exhaustive overview of his work to thoroughly vet Bove’s nomination in light of three whistleblower allegations made against the nominee.

    In a speech on the Senate floor, Grassley outlined how his team ran into challenges while attempting to review each whistleblower disclosure in good faith: “any assertion that I or my staff was uninterested in the evidence is false.”

    Grassley is a co-founder and co-chair of the Senate Whistleblower Protection Caucus.

    Bove’s letter to the committee regarding the most recent whistleblower allegations is HERE.

    Video and a transcript of Grassley’s floor remarks is below.

    [embedded content]

    Prepared Floor Remarks by Senator Chuck Grassley of Iowa

    Chairman, Senate Judiciary Committee

    “The Nomination of Emil Bove”

    Tuesday, July 29, 2025

    VIDEO

    Soon, this body will proceed to a final vote on the nomination of Emil Bove to be a judge on the Third Circuit. As I said in my statements in Committee multiple times, I support the nomination of Mr. Bove. He has a strong legal background and has served his country honorably. I believe he will be a diligent, capable, and fair jurist. My Republican colleagues on Committee agreed, and that’s why he was reported out of Committee with every Republican supporting his nomination.

    It’s no surprise to anyone who’s followed this nomination that I have serious concerns with how my Democratic colleagues have conducted themselves. The vicious rhetoric, unfair accusations and abuse directed at Mr. Bove by some on this Committee has crossed the line. I wish I could say that this posture has been limited to just this nomination, but unfortunately, it appears to be a pattern.

    Since the very beginning of this Congress, Democrats have engaged in a relentless obstruction campaign for nearly every one of President Trump’s nominees. Their playbook has included maximum procedural obstruction, unfair media attacks, repeated attempts to allege misconduct and demands for delayed consideration, records and investigations.

    This Congress alone, Democrats have sent at least 26 letters to 17 agencies or parties demanding records, delays or investigations into President Trump’s nominees just in the Judiciary Committee. Like clockwork, just before a hearing or vote, we get another breathless accusation that one of President Trump’s nominees needs to be investigated.

    I’m afraid that what we’ve seen recently on the Bove nomination has been more of the same. My Democratic colleagues have tried to weaponize my respect for whistleblowers and the whistleblowing process against me and against Mr. Bove, and I’m going to set the record straight.

    I take whistleblower complaints very seriously. During both Republican and Democratic administrations, I have spent over four decades defending patriotic whistleblowers.

    My conduct in defending whistleblowers and running bipartisan investigations stands in stark contrast to the conduct of my Democratic colleagues.

    During the first Trump administration, I defended the Ukraine whistleblower’s use of the whistleblower process—despite serious concerns about the substance of his complaint.

    When I was last Chairman, I interviewed Donald Trump Jr. and other Republicans as part of my bipartisan investigation into alleged Russian collusion—conducted through the Senate Judiciary Committee.

    But when it came to the Biden family and his Administration, despite serious allegations and overwhelming evidence of misconduct, Democrats made no effort to investigate or conduct similar interviews. In fact, they worked hard to thwart any attempt at oversight.

    These weren’t fringe claims—they involved potential crimes squarely within the Judiciary Committee’s jurisdiction.

    This administration has said Mr. Reuvini isn’t a whistleblower. I’ve publicly disagreed with that position.

    That’s the opposite posture my Democratic colleagues took with the IRS whistleblowers who blew the whistle on the Biden administration. My Democratic colleagues tried to destroy them and used the press to falsely claim they weren’t whistleblowers.

    No one can say that I don’t take whistleblower complaints seriously, or that I don’t investigate allegations in good faith. I’ve always said that my door is open to whistleblowers, and my efforts regarding the Bove nomination show this is true.

    Mr. Reuveni first made allegations against Mr. Bove the morning before his nomination hearing. The allegations broke in a New York Times story, and the paper gleefully ran the unvetted accusations without so much as giving the Justice Department or the nominee the opportunity to respond.

    The Deputy Attorney General flatly denied the allegations in a public statement, and the nominee denied them under oath both in the hearing and in response to written questions.

    Then, my Democratic colleagues received additional records from the whistleblower on July 1 and July 7 but hid them from Republicans. I didn’t receive them until July 10—the same day that Mr. Bove was scheduled for his first markup.

    The coordinated media strategy involved a New York Times exclusive about the files, and a Democratic press release containing a misleading summary of the documents—all designed to smear Mr. Bove.

    This timeline raises serious concerns, and it’s legitimate to raise them as a major problem. If my Democratic colleagues wanted to investigate allegations, they should have come to me and we could have vetted the allegations in good faith, together. They didn’t want this. They wanted to run a one-sided media campaign.

    Regardless, I still did my job and investigated.

    My staff reviewed the disclosures document-by-document and analyzed the facts. The result? Almost none of the material references Mr. Bove at all. More concerningly, the Democrat summary grossly mischaracterized the documents it purported to summarize. In short, the documents didn’t say what Democrats say they did.

    My staff also interviewed multiple people who were present for the March 14 meeting described in the whistleblower disclosure. Four separate people other than Mr. Bove who were present in the meeting told us the following:

    My staff also spoke to numerous other individuals, including many current or former Justice Department employees, who wanted to share information about the Bove nomination. All told, my staff interviewed or spoke with more than a dozen individuals who came forward to discuss the Bove nomination.

    With respect to the initial whistleblower allegations, even if you accept most of the claims as true, there’s no scandal. Government lawyers aggressively litigating and interpreting court orders isn’t misconduct—it’s what lawyers do.

    Concerningly, the Minority repeatedly recast discussion of litigation strategy as wrongdoing, even discussions that reflected the government’s official litigation positions, some of which prevailed on appeal.

    The whistleblower alleged misconduct—but ten days after the key event he describes, he signed a brief stating—without qualification—that “the Government has complied with the Court’s orders in this case.”

    If he believed the Department defied court orders, why sign a brief as an officer of the court saying it had complied?

    During the hearing, Mr. Bove firmly denied the allegations. He testified under oath: “I did not advise any Justice Department attorney to violate court orders.”

    Recent public reporting backs his account. Months before the whistleblower came forward, his former supervisor wrote in a letter that Mr. Bove advised our team that we must avoid a court order halting an upcoming operation to implement the Act at all costs. This statement confirms Mr. Bove advised his team to avoid triggering a court order, not defy one—that’s consistent with his testimony.

    That was the initial allegation, but now, on the eve of Mr. Bove’s final vote, the Democrats and their media allies have launched yet another salvo against Mr. Bove.

    On Friday, we learned from social media that two other whistleblowers allegedly have derogatory information about Mr. Bove.

    One whistleblower said that they’ve filed a complaint with the Inspector General. My staff requested the complaint and to speak with the whistleblower. Their requests were declined.

    Another group, called Justice Connection, publicly alleged that a whistleblower has evidence that Bove wasn’t truthful in his hearing, and that the whistleblower “has tried to share info with Republican senators for weeks and they haven’t responded.”

    To the extent that anyone is suggesting that I haven’t been willing to receive and consider relevant evidence—this is plainly false. I’m the Chairman of the Judiciary Committee, and I represent Republicans on this nomination. Regarding this whistleblower, my office wasn’t proactively approached.

    Indeed, since we saw these new reports on Friday, my staff proactively – and repeatedly – reached out to the whistleblower’s lawyers, asking to see the evidence that they apparently had already shared with multiple Democrats and the media.

    My staff assured them that we would review the evidence in good faith, but all weekend, my staff was stonewalled and given the runaround. Any assertion that I or my staff was uninterested in the evidence is false.

    It wasn’t until Monday morning that my staff received any information. Even then, it was bits and pieces of information created by the lawyers, not original information. My staff tried over and over to get all the information, only to be rejected.

    My staff was not shown the underlying transcript of the meeting until this morning. They were shown what was represented to be a verbatim transcript of a meeting, but we still didn’t get access to the underlying source.

    So, what did I do? I followed my usual process and asked Mr. Bove to respond to the allegations that his testimony was inconsistent with the evidence presented. And he sent me a letter doing just that. I’ll plan to make it public.

    In his letter, Mr. Bove flatly denies the allegation that he misled the Committee. He explained that he testified truthfully in response to “compound yes/no questions that sought to attribute words to me that I did not use during the February 14, 2025 video meeting.” He also responds to the attacks on his character and rejects the allegations against him.

    Viewed in light of the transcript, Bove’s responses to compound, hostile questions about specific words used a meeting that happened months before his hearing do not, to me, indicate deliberately false or misleading testimony.

    And more importantly, the substance of the meeting itself does not reflect misconduct. It reflected a sympathetic tone during a turbulent time, and appropriately characterizes the role of a Justice Department attorney. In the meeting, Mr. Bove specifically acknowledges that being a Justice Department Attorney means “Following orders from the President and from the Attorney General, unless we view them as unlawful or unethical.” He apologized to the attorneys present for the tension and told them, “I don’t want to put pressure on you.”

    This context is important.

    I’m also curious at my Democratic colleagues’ newfound interest in candor to the Committee. During the last administration, Kristen Clarke unequivocally perjured herself before the Judiciary Committee in response to written questions.

    When the information came to light after her confirmation, Democrats closed ranks and refused to join Republicans in their call to hold her accountable. Democrats likewise expressed no interest in evaluating the misleading or inconsistent testimony from numerous other Biden appointees.

    When this Committee considered the nomination of Justice Kavanaugh, I criticized the tactics the Democrats employed.

    I said:

    “The Ranking Member sat on these allegations for nearly seven weeks, only to reveal them at the eleventh hour when it appeared Judge Kavanaugh was headed towards confirmation.”

    With respect to the Bove nomination, as with other nominees this Congress, Democrats appear to have dusted off the playbook they devised against Justice Kavanaugh. They hid allegedly relevant information until a politically opportune time, and then used it as an ambush to hurt the nominee.

    As I said about the Democrats conduct during Director Patel’s nomination:

    “This is becoming a pattern, and I will not facilitate a campaign to undermine the results of the election by delaying the consideration of nominees.”

    If anyone, including my colleagues, has information regarding a nominee that they believe is relevant to their fitness for office, I expect them to share it with me in a timely and candid manner so that the allegations can be fairly vetted. My door is always open to whistleblowers, and while I may not always agree with someone else’s conclusion, I’ll always fairly consider any information brought to my office.

    My message to the three whistleblowers is this: just because I may disagree with the conclusions in a whistleblower disclosure, it doesn’t mean that I don’t support a whistleblower’s right to come forward.

    Whether I agree or disagree with a whistleblower, I’ll defend whistleblower rights.

    Reasonable minds can differ. And when I direct my staff to allocate resources away from other ongoing whistleblower projects to handle situations like Bove, their efforts ought to be respected and given good faith treatment.

    But eleventh-hour media smears by my colleagues based on information that was hidden from the Committee are unacceptable, and I won’t stand for it as a delay and obstruction tactic.

    This tactic didn’t work against Justice Kavanaugh, and it won’t work against Mr. Bove.

    I look forward to supporting Mr. Bove and urge all of my colleagues to do the same.

    -30-

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: What They Are Saying: Whistleblowers Laud Grassley’s Advocacy for Transparency and Accountability

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Iowa Chuck Grassley

    WASHINGTON – On National Whistleblower Day, whistleblowers helped by Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) expressed their gratitude for his tireless advocacy. Grassley is the co-founder and co-chair of the Whistleblower Protection Caucus.

    In March, the Department of Treasury promoted Internal Revenue Service (IRS) whistleblowers Gary Shapley and Joseph Ziegler after Grassley urged the department to do so. In May, Grassley secured promotions, restored law enforcement credentials and backpay for three Customs and Border Protection (CBP) whistleblowers.

    This month, Grassley spearheaded a resolution marking July 30th as National Whistleblower Appreciation Day. The resolution celebrates whistleblowers who risk their careers, jobs and reputations to report waste, fraud and abuse that can cost billions each year. Grassley also introduced legislation to strengthen whistleblower protections for Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) employees and federal contractors, while calling on President Trump to ensure federal downsizing initiatives aren’t used to retaliate against whistleblowers.

    Here’s what the whistleblowers had to say about Grassley’s work:

    “We saw firsthand why Senator Grassley is known as the Patron Saint of Whistleblowers. From the very beginning, he took our concerns seriously and stood by us every step of the way. Just when it felt like all hope was lost, he found a way forward. We are deeply grateful for his unwavering support – not only for us, but for the hundreds of other whistleblowers he’s championed over the years. We will never be able to repay the senator for his unwavering commitment, but we are dedicated to carrying his example forward,” IRS whistleblowers Gary Shapley and Joe Ziegler said.

    “For 7+ years, Senator Grassley and his staff have been the singular unwavering advocate and champion for me as a federal whistleblower. When my elected Congressmen and Senators ignored and dismissed my requests for assistance, Senator Grassley was the lone voice of support. Grassley and his staff fully vetted my whistleblower allegations and engaged with the Biden administration to address the Whistleblower Retaliation. Grassley’s commitment to stay the course has led to positive and meaningful cooperation with President Trump, Secretary Noem and CBP Commissioner Scott. I can attest that Grassley is a true and honorable statesman and an unwavering man of his word. I have confidence in Grassley’s commitment to holding those accountable for their retaliation and remaining with whistleblowers until there is a proper resolution. The words ‘thank you’ are inadequate and cannot express my respect and gratitude for Senator Grassley,” Customs and Border Protection (CBP) whistleblower Mark Jones said.

    “Over seven years ago, my colleagues and I reported an orchestrated, willful obstruction of the law, which facilitated thousands of murders and sexual assaults on U.S. soil. Even after our allegations were clearly substantiated by federal agencies, Customs and Border Patrol committed clear reprisals against us, rewarding the perpetrators while our careers were ruined, and our health and reputations were irreparably harmed. Senator Grassley affected more relief for us in two years than all the other oversight and whistleblower protection entities achieved over the last seven years. One dedicated senator from Iowa did so much more to protect whistleblowers than anyone else. Thank you, Senator Grassley, for defending those whose only interest is serving the public and honoring their oath to the Constitution,” Customs and Border Protection (CBP) whistleblower Mike Taylor said.

    “I am grateful for all the time Senator Grassley and his staff have spent working on our behalf over the past seven years. They’ve helped hold the individuals accountable who retaliated against us for reporting obstruction of a law intended to keep Americans safe. We worked extensively with multiple executive branch agencies whose responsibilities include whistleblower protection, but none were willing or able to advocate on our behalf. In spite of our case being open for over seven years, the senator and his staff met with us on multiple occasions and have never stopped pushing for justice and accountability,” Customs and Border Protection (CBP) whistleblower Fred Wynn said.

    -30-

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: RGA Statement on Kamala Harris Not Running for Governor of California

    Source: US Republican Governors Association

    The following text contains opinion that is not, or not necessarily, that of MIL-OSI –

    WASHINGTON, D.C. – The Republican Governors Association (RGA) released the following statement today in response to Kamala Harris announcing she will not run for Governor of California:

    “Kamala Harris’ political career is over thanks to President Trump. Look no further than her decision to not run for governor. She would have been a disaster for California: tanking the state’s economy even further, protecting criminal illegal immigrants over law-abiding citizens, and further bringing the Democrat Party brand down with her, just like she did as Vice President,” said RGA Rapid Response Director Kollin Crompton. “Americans across the country can sigh in relief that they won’t have to see or hear from Kamala Harris any longer.”

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: NCDHHS Announces First West Nile Case of 2025

    Source: US State of North Carolina

    Headline: NCDHHS Announces First West Nile Case of 2025

    NCDHHS Announces First West Nile Case of 2025
    jawerner

    The North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services has announced the state’s first case of disease associated with West Nile virus in 2025. The case occurred in a resident of Durham County. To protect the patient’s privacy, no further information will be provided.

    West Nile virus-infected mosquitoes were also recently identified through routine monitoring in Pitt County. This mosquito testing is part of a collaboration between Pitt County Vector Control and NCDHHS to prevent transmission of West Nile virus and other mosquito-borne diseases.

    “This is the time of year when West Nile virus activity typically increases across North Carolina,” said Emily Herring, NCDHHS Public Health Veterinarian. “This recent case highlights the importance of preventing mosquito bites to reduce the risk of infection.” 

    West Nile virus is a mosquito-borne virus that can cause serious, life-altering disease or death. Only cases of neurologic illness are reportable in North Carolina. The virus is carried by wild birds and can be transmitted to people through the bite of an infected mosquito. It does not spread from person to person.

    Most people infected with West Nile virus will not experience any symptoms, but about one in five people infected will develop a fever and other symptoms such as headache, body aches and joint pain. About one in 150 people will develop a serious neurologic illness and symptoms may include high fever, headache, neck stiffness, disorientation, seizures, and paralysis. Elderly people and people with weakened immune systems are at higher risk of developing severe illness due to West Nile virus infection. If you are ill and suspect you may be infected with West Nile virus, contact your health care provider.

    Not all mosquitoes can infect people with West Nile virus, but the mosquitoes that most commonly transmit the virus can be found statewide and are most active between dusk and dawn. Follow these tips to prevent mosquito bites and reduce your risk of exposure to West Nile virus: 

    • When spending time outdoors, use an EPA-registered insect repellent and wear clothing and gear treated with permethrin. Remember to always follow label instructions when using these products.
    • Wear loose-fitting, long-sleeved shirts and pants when outdoors.
    • Prevent water from collecting in containers around your home. After every rainfall, tip out any containers that can hold water, even a small amount, such as saucers under flowerpots. Cover, turn over or throw away items like toys, buckets and tires. Change the water in birdbaths and pet bowls at least twice a week.
    • Keep gutters clean and in good repair and replace corrugated downspout extensions with smooth extensions to prevent mosquito larvae from growing.
    • Make sure rain barrels have tight-fitting screens or lids.
    • Treat standing water in containers and low areas around the home with EPA-approved larvicides. Many options are available that last for weeks to months.
    • When possible, drain any standing water on your property such as puddles and ditches that hold water for more than four days after rain.
    • Use screened windows and doors, and make sure screens fit tightly and are not torn. 

    For more information, visit the NCDHHS West Nile Virus webpage or the CDC West Nile virus webpage and learn more about preventing mosquito bites.

    El Departamento de Salud y Servicios Humanos de Carolina del Norte ha anunciado el primer caso de enfermedad asociada con el virus del Nilo Occidental en 2025. El caso ocurrió en un habitante del condado de Durham. Para proteger la privacidad del paciente, no se proporcionará más información.

    Los mosquitos infectados por el virus del Nilo Occidental también se identificaron recientemente a través del monitoreo de rutina en el condado de Pitt. Esta prueba de mosquitos es parte de una colaboración entre Control de Vectores del condado Pitt y el Departamento de Salud y Servicios Humanos de Carolina del Norte (NCDHHS, por sus siglas en inglés) para prevenir la transmisión del virus del Nilo Occidental y otras enfermedades transmitidas por mosquitos.

    “Esta es la época del año en que la actividad del virus del Nilo Occidental generalmente aumenta en Carolina del Norte”, dijo Emily Herring, veterinaria de salud pública del NCDHHS. “Este caso reciente destaca la importancia de prevenir las picaduras de mosquitos para reducir el riesgo de infección”.

    El virus del Nilo Occidental es un virus transmitido por mosquitos que puede causar enfermedades graves que alteran la vida, o la muerte. En Carolina del Norte solo se reportan los casos de enfermedades neurológicas. El virus es transmitido por aves silvestres y puede transmitirse a las personas a través de la picadura de un mosquito infectado. No se transmite de persona a persona.

    La mayoría de las personas infectadas con el virus del Nilo Occidental no experimentarán ningún síntoma, pero aproximadamente una de cada cinco personas infectadas desarrollará fiebre y otros síntomas como dolor de cabeza, dolores corporales y dolor en las articulaciones. Aproximadamente una de cada 150 personas desarrollará una enfermedad neurológica grave y los síntomas pueden incluir fiebre alta, dolor de cabeza, rigidez en el cuello, desorientación, convulsiones y parálisis. Las personas mayores y las personas con sistemas inmunitarios debilitados corren un mayor riesgo de desarrollar enfermedades graves debido a la infección por el virus del Nilo Occidental. Si está enfermo y sospecha que puede estar infectado con el virus del Nilo Occidental, comuníquese con su proveedor de atención médica.

    No todos los mosquitos pueden infectar a las personas con el virus del Nilo Occidental, pero los mosquitos que transmiten el virus con mayor frecuencia se pueden encontrar en todo el estado y son más activos entre el anochecer y el amanecer. Siga estos consejos para prevenir las picaduras de mosquitos y reducir el riesgo de exposición al virus del Nilo Occidental: 

    • Cuando pase tiempo al aire libre, use un repelente de insectos registrado por la Agencia de Protección Ambiental (EPA, por sus siglas en inglés) y use ropa y equipo tratado con permetrina. Recuerde seguir siempre las instrucciones de la etiqueta cuando utilice estos productos.
    • Use camisas y pantalones holgados de manga larga cuando esté al aire libre.
    • Evite que el agua se acumule en contenedores alrededor de su hogar. Después de cada lluvia, vierta cualquier recipiente que pueda contener agua, incluso una pequeña cantidad, como platillos debajo de macetas. Cubra, dé la vuelta o deseche artículos como juguetes, cubos, baldes y neumáticos. Cambie el agua en baños para pájaros y tazones para mascotas al menos dos veces por semana.
    • Mantenga las canaletas limpias y en buen estado y reemplace las extensiones de canalón corrugadas (bajantes de agua ondulados) con extensiones suaves para evitar que crezcan las larvas de mosquitos.
    • Asegúrese de que los barriles de lluvia tengan mallas o tapas ajustadas.
    • Trate el agua estancada en recipientes y áreas bajas alrededor de la casa con larvicidas aprobados por la EPA. Hay muchas opciones disponibles que duran de semanas a meses.
    • Cuando sea posible, drene cualquier agua estancada en su propiedad, como charcos y zanjas que retengan agua durante más de cuatro días después de la lluvia.
    • Utilice ventanas y puertas con mosquiteros, y asegúrese de que las mallas de los mosquiteros encajen bien y no estén rotas.

    Para obtener más información, visite la página web del NCDHHS sobre el virus del Nilo Occidental o la página web de los Centros para el Control y la Prevención de Enfermedades (CDC, por sus siglas en inglés) sobre el virus del Nilo Occidental y obtenga más información sobre la prevención de las picaduras de mosquitos.

    Jul 30, 2025

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI: LYNO Launches Stage 1 of Token Presale, Introducing AI-Powered Arbitrage Protocol Across 15+ Chains

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    ROAD TOWN, British Virgin Islands, July 30, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — LYNO, a decentralized cross-chain arbitrage protocol powered by artificial intelligence, has officially launched Stage 1 of its token presale. Designed to democratize arbitrage trading through automation and real-time market tracking, LYNO represents a significant step forward in AI-integrated DeFi infrastructure.

    Presale Stage 1: Early Access at $0.05

    The LYNO presale is structured across seven phases, starting with the Community Round – Early Bird stage. This initial stage will offer 16 million tokens at a price of $0.05, representing 3.20% of the total 140 million token supply. The project aims to raise $800,000 during this round. Once this phase concludes, the price will increase to $0.055, rewarding early participation.

    Transforming Arbitrage with AI and Cross-Chain Access

    LYNO’s core protocol enables AI-driven arbitrage across more than fifteen EVM-compatible blockchains, including Ethereum, BNB Chain, Polygon, Arbitrum, and Optimism. Its autonomous engine identifies and acts on price discrepancies between exchanges, enabling continuous and decentralized arbitrage trading.

    Unlike traditional arbitrage systems limited to institutions, LYNO’s model is open to the public. The platform uses zero-knowledge proofs to protect against front-running and MEV attacks, and its smart contracts are audited by Cyberscope to ensure robust security.

    Governance, Utility, and Security Empower $LYNO Token Holders

    $LYNO token holders can participate in governance by proposing and voting on platform upgrades, fee structures, and supported chains. Holders can also benefit from protocol rewards, with up to 60% of fees distributed to stakers. Additional utilities include access to AI arbitrage agents, staking incentives, and liquidity rewards. A strategic buyback and burn mechanism, supported by treasury allocations, aims to reinforce token value over time.

    Presale Participation

    To join the presale, participants must use an Ethereum-compatible wallet via WalletConnect and can purchase tokens using ETH or USDT on the official LYNO website. Purchased tokens will be claimable after the presale concludes.

    This announcement marks the official opening of LYNO’s fundraising efforts and highlights a new era in AI-based decentralized finance. With the presale offering at its initial price point, early participants are positioned at the foundation of a multi-chain arbitrage protocol with wide-reaching DeFi implications.

    Resources
    Website: https://lyno.ai
    Buy Presale: https://lyno.ai/#presale
    Whitepaper: https://lyno.ai/whitepaper.pdf
    Twitter/X: https://x.com/Lyno_AI
    Telegram: https://t.me/lyno_ai

    Contact
    LYNO AI
    contact@lyno.ai

    Disclaimer: This content is provided by LYNO AI. The statements, views, and opinions expressed in this content are solely those of the content provider and do not necessarily reflect the views of this media platform or its publisher. We do not endorse, verify, or guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of any information presented. We do not guarantee any claims, statements, or promises made in this article. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial, investment, or trading advice. Investing in crypto and mining-related opportunities involves significant risks, including the potential loss of capital. It is possible to lose all your capital. These products may not be suitable for everyone, and you should ensure that you understand the risks involved. Seek independent advice if necessary. Speculate only with funds that you can afford to lose. Readers are strongly encouraged to conduct their own research and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. However, due to the inherently speculative nature of the blockchain sector—including cryptocurrency, NFTs, and mining—complete accuracy cannot always be guaranteed. Neither the media platform nor the publisher shall be held responsible for any fraudulent activities, misrepresentations, or financial losses arising from the content of this press release. In the event of any legal claims or charges against this article, we accept no liability or responsibility. Globenewswire does not endorse any content on this page.

    Legal Disclaimer: This media platform provides the content of this article on an “as-is” basis, without any warranties or representations of any kind, express or implied. We assume no responsibility for any inaccuracies, errors, or omissions. We do not assume any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information presented herein. Any concerns, complaints, or copyright issues related to this article should be directed to the content provider mentioned above.

    Photos accompanying this announcement are available at

    https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/8f0067dc-9fd6-4fb5-946d-da28a2c2c60d

    https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/1b61824b-5274-43fc-a528-8809701f9bcc

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: Freehold Royalties Announces Second Quarter 2025 Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    CALGARY, Alberta, July 30, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Freehold Royalties Ltd. (Freehold or the Company) (TSX:FRU) announces second quarter results for the period ended June 30, 2025.

    Second Quarter Highlights

    • $78 million in revenue;
    • $57 million in funds from operations ($0.35/share) (1)(2);
    • $44 million in dividends paid ($0.27/share)(3);
    • 11,047 bbls/d of total crude oil and natural gas liquids (NGLs) production, a 4% increase from the previous quarter and a 13% increase year-over-year;
    • 67% weighting to liquids, an increase from 64% in the second quarter of 2024;
    • 16,584 boe/d of total production, a 2% increase from the previous quarter and a 9% increase year-over-year;
    • Gross drilling of 271 wells, comprised of 45 wells in Canada and 226 in the U.S.;
    • Continued active leasing program with 40 new leases signed during the second quarter of 2025 (34 in Canada; 6 in the U.S.) contributing revenue of $1.9 million and $5.8 million in the first half of 2025; and
    • $50.36/boe average realized price ($57.83/boe in the U.S. and $44.23/boe in Canada);
      • 31% pricing premium on Freehold’s U.S. production reflecting higher liquids weighting, higher quality crude oil and reduced transportation costs.

    President’s Message

    Freehold’s second quarter production of 16,584 boe/d increased 2% compared to last quarter and 9% from the second quarter of 2024. Our U.S. assets delivered meaningful production growth of 7% over the first quarter of 2025. Supporting this growth has been improvements in well productivity where recent new well results in both the Permian and Eagle Ford basins have demonstrated production rates more than double those of the offsetting area type curves as operators continue to enhance drilling and completion approaches. Specific to our second quarter results, this productivity increase was paired with a series of higher royalty interest developments which magnified the production impact on the quarter. In Canada, we continue to see operators focusing capital on our oil weighted plays in Mannville heavy oil, the Clearwater and southeast Saskatchewan. These three oil plays represent approximately 30% of our Canadian production and volumes have grown 10% since the second quarter of 2024 through active drilling by multiple operators on our lands in these areas.

    Our oil focused portfolio, underpinned by investment grade operators in premier basins across North America, delivered $57 million in funds from operations in the quarter, or $0.35/share(1)(2). Oil prices in the second quarter were at the lowest benchmark WTI oil price since the first quarter of 2021. For reference, our funds from operations in the first quarter of 2021 was $0.25/share – this quarter we are 40% higher, confirming the impact that Freehold’s strategic focus on growing its high quality, liquids weighted assets has had over the past four years.

    Bonus and leasing revenue remained strong generating $1.9 million during the quarter and $5.8 million in the first half of 2025. This $5.8 million represents a 50% increase from the Company’s previous record levels of lease bonus which occurred over the full year in 2018. This record level of leasing revenue has been driven by active leasing of the mineral title lands we have been acquiring in the U.S. as well as continued leasing of our legacy mineral title lands in Canada.

    In total, we paid $44 million in dividends to our shareholders this quarter while maintaining the strength of our balance sheet with net debt of $271 million, representing 1.1x trailing net debt to funds from operations(2)(5). We invested approximately $12 million in land acquisitions this quarter, purchasing undeveloped mineral title lands in the core of the Midland and Delaware basins.  

    David M. Spyker, President and Chief Executive Officer

    Operating and Financial Highlights

      Three Months Ended
    FINANCIAL ($ millions, except as noted) Q2-2025 Q1-2025 Q2-2024
    West Texas Intermediate (US$/bbl) 63.74 71.42 80.57
    AECO 5A Monthly Index (Cdn$/Mcf) 1.69 2.17 1.18
    Royalty and other revenue 78.3 91.1 84.5
    Funds from operations 56.6 68.1 59.6
    Funds from operations per share, basic ($) (1)(2) 0.35 0.42 0.40
    Dividends paid per share ($) (3) 0.27 0.27 0.27
    Dividend payout ratio (%) (2) 78% 65% 68%
    Long-term debt 292.6 294.3 228.0
    Net debt (5) 270.6 272.2 199.1
    Net debt to trailing funds from operations (times) (5) 1.1x 1.1x 0.8x
    OPERATING      
    Total production (boe/d) (4) 16,584 16,248 15,221
    Canadian production (boe/d)(4) 9,104 9,278 9,622
    U.S. production (boe/d)(4) 7,480 6,970 5,599
    Oil and NGL (%) 67% 65% 64%
    Petroleum and natural gas realized price ($/boe) (4) 50.36 59.29 59.74
    Cash costs ($/boe) (2)(4) 7.38 7.00 9.80
    Netback ($/boe) (2) (4) 42.68 53.01 49.44
    ROYALTY INTEREST DRILLING (gross / net)      
    Canada 45 / 1.1 92 / 3.9 65 / 2.1
    U.S. 226 / 0.6 230 / 0.8 209 / 1.0

    (1)  Calculated based on the basic weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period
    (2)  See Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures
    (3)  Based on the number of shares issued and outstanding at each record date
    (4)  See Conversion of Natural Gas to Barrels of Oil Equivalent (boe)
    (5)  Net debt and net debt to trailing funds from operations are capital management measures. See Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures.

    Dividend Announcement

    The board of directors of Freehold has declared a monthly dividend of $0.09 per share to be paid on September 15, 2025, to shareholders of record on August 29, 2025. The dividend is designated as an eligible dividend for Canadian income tax purposes.

    Drilling and Leasing Activity

    In total, 271 gross wells (1.7 net wells) were drilled on Freehold’s royalty lands during the second quarter of 2025, a decrease of 16% compared to the previous quarter primarily due to the impact of spring break-up in Canada.

    Drilling was oil focused with approximately 17% of gross wells drilled in Canada and 83% in the U.S.

      Three Months Ended
      Q2-2025 Q1-2025 Q2-2024
      Gross Net (1) Gross Net (1) Gross Net (1)
    Canada 45 1.1 92 3.9 65 2.1
    United States 226 0.6 230 0.8 209 1.0
    Total 271 1.7 322 4.7 274 3.1

    (1)  Equivalent net wells are aggregate of the numbers obtained by multiplying each gross well by our royalty interest percentage; U.S. wells on Freehold’s lands generally come on production at approximately 10 times the volume that of an average Canadian well in our portfolio.

    Canada

    Canadian drilling was down compared to the previous quarter primarily due to the impact of spring break-up and weaker AECO prices curtailing natural gas activity. Drilling during the second quarter was focused on our crude oil plays including the Clearwater (8 gross wells), southeast Saskatchewan (8 gross wells), and Mannville heavy oil (6 gross wells). Licencing activity remained consistent with 2024 on a year-to-date basis. In conjunction with improving sentiment on Canadian natural gas pricing with LNG Canada starting up, 22 wells have been licensed on our Deep Basin/Montney lands in the first half of 2025 (a significant increase from nine licenses in the first half of 2024).  

    During the second quarter of 2025, Freehold entered into 34 new leases with 10 counterparties totalling approximately $0.7 million in bonus and lease rental revenue. The majority of the new leasing was in southeast Saskatchewan.

    U.S.

    During the second quarter of 2025, 226 gross (0.6 net) wells were drilled on our U.S. lands. Approximately 86% of second quarter drilling was in the Permian basin and 13% in the Eagle Ford basin. At the end of the second quarter of 2025, Freehold had 2.2 net drilled but uncompleted wells and 2.4 net wells permitted but not yet drilled.

    Initial production for U.S. wells is approximately ten times that of an average Canadian well in the Company’s portfolio, making equivalent net well additions much more meaningful in the U.S. compared to Canada. However, a U.S. well can take upwards of six to twelve months on average from initial permit to first production, compared to three to four months in Canada.

    During the second quarter of 2025, Freehold entered into six new U.S. leases with four counterparties, totalling $1.2 million of bonus and lease rental revenue. Leasing activity was primarily in the Permian basin.

    Conference Call Details

    A webcast to discuss financial and operational results for the period ended June 30, 2025, will be held for the investment community on Thursday July 31, 2025, beginning at 7:00 AM MT (9:00 AM ET).

    A live audio webcast will be accessible through the link below and on Freehold’s website under “Events & Presentations” on Freehold’s website at www.freeholdroyalties.com. To participate in the conference call, you can register using the following link: Live Audio Webcast URL: https://edge.media-server.com/mmc/p/6t37memx.

    A dial-in option is also available and can be accessed by dialing 1-800-806-5484 (toll-free in North America) participant passcode is 8979321#.

    For further information contact

    Select Quarterly Information

      2025 2024 2023
    Financial ($millions, except as noted) Q2 Q1 Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1 Q4 Q3
    Royalty and other revenue 78.3 91.1 76.9 73.9 84.5 74.3 80.1 84.2
    Net Income (loss) 6.2 37.3 51.1 25.0 39.3 34.0 34.3 42.3
    Per share, basic ($) (1) 0.04 0.23 0.33 0.17 0.26 0.23 0.23 0.28
    Cash flows from operations 57.4 62.9 59.1 64.1 47.6 52.5 70.7 53.7
    Funds from operations 56.6 68.1 61.3 55.7 59.6 54.4 62.8 65.3
    Per share, basic ($) (1)(3) 0.35 0.42 0.40 0.37 0.40 0.36 0.42 0.43
    Acquisitions & related expenditures 15.2 13.9 277.0 1.8 11.5 121.5 2.1 1.2
    Dividends paid 44.3 44.3 40.7 40.7 40.7 40.7 40.7 40.7
    Per share ($) (2) 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27
    Dividends declared 44.3 44.3 41.9 40.7 40.7 40.7 40.7 40.7
    Per share ($) (2) 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27
    Dividend payout ratio (%) (3) 78% 65% 66% 73% 68% 75% 65% 62%
    Long-term debt 292.6 294.3 300.9 205.8 228.0 223.6 123.0 141.2
    Net debt (5)(6) 270.6 272.2 282.3 187.1 199.1 210.5 100.9 113.4
    Shares outstanding, period end (000s) 164.0 164.0 164.0 150.7 150.7 150.7 150.7 150.7
    Average shares outstanding, basic (000s) (7) 164.0 164.0 153.4 150.7 150.7 150.7 150.7 150.7
    Operating                
    Light and medium oil (bbl/d) 6,940 6,880 6,296 6,080 6,551 6,094 6,308 6,325
    Heavy oil (bbl/d) 1,557 1,552 1,516 1,315 1,348 1,300 1,182 1,127
    NGL (bbl/d) 2,550 2,203 2,066 1,972 1,902 1,884 1,878 1,678
    Total liquids (bbl/d) 11,047 10,635 9,878 9,367 9,801 9,278 9,368 9,130
    Natural gas (Mcf/d) 33,220 33,678 32,564 31,447 32,524 32,617 32,968 32,851
    Total production (boe/d) (4) 16,584 16,248 15,306 14,608 15,221 14,714 14,863 14,605
    Oil and NGL (%) 67% 65% 65% 64% 64% 63% 63% 63%
    Petroleum & natural gas realized price ($/boe) (4) 50.36 59.29 53.80 54.36 59.74 54.81 57.94 61.55
    Cash costs ($/boe) (3)(4) 7.38 7.00 5.93 5.42 9.80 7.19 4.73 5.10
    Netback ($/boe) (3)(4) 42.68 53.01 47.25 47.78 49.44 46.62 52.59 55.63
    Benchmark Prices                
    West Texas Intermediate crude oil (US$/bbl) 63.74 71.42 70.27 75.09 80.57 76.96 78.32 82.26
    Exchange rate (Cdn$/US$) 1.38 1.43 1.40 1.37 1.37 1.35 1.36 1.34
    Edmonton Light Sweet crude oil (Cdn$/bbl) 84.25 95.32 94.90 97.85 105.29 92.14 99.69 107.89
    Western Canadian Select crude oil (Cdn$/bbl) 73.96 84.30 80.75 83.95 91.63 77.77 76.96 93.05
    Nymex natural gas (US$/Mcf) 3.57 3.79 2.86 2.24 1.96 2.33 2.98 2.64
    AECO 5A Monthly Index (Cdn$/Mcf) 1.69 2.17 1.48 0.69 1.18 1.80 2.60 1.88

    (1)  Calculated based on the basic weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period
    (2)  Based on the number of shares issued and outstanding at each record date
    (3)  See Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures
    (4)  See Conversion of Natural Gas to Barrels of Oil Equivalent (boe)
    (5)  The 2023 reported balances have been restated due to the retrospective adoption of IAS 1 (see note 3d of December 31, 2024 audited consolidated financial statements)
    (6)  Net debt is a capital management measures; see Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures
    (7)  Weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period, basic

    Forward-Looking Statements

    This news release offers our assessment of Freehold’s future plans and operations as of July 30, 2025, and contains forward-looking statements that we believe allow readers to better understand our business and prospects. These forward-looking statements include our expectations for the following:

    • our expectations with the improving sentiment on Canadian natural gas pricing with LNG Canada starting up;
    • our expectations regarding improvements in well productivity where recent new well results in both the Permian and Eagle Ford basins have demonstrated production rates more than double those of the offsetting area type curves as operators continue to enhance drilling and completion approaches;
    • our expectation that in Canada operators will continue to focus capital on our oil weighted plays of the Mannville Stack, the Clearwater and southeast Saskatchewan;
    • our expectation that U.S. wells typically come on production at approximately ten times that of an average Canadian well in the Company’s portfolio, making net well additions much more valuable in the U.S. compared to Canada;
    • our expectations that a U.S. well can take upwards of six to twelve months on average from initial license to first production, compared to three to four months in Canada; and
    • other similar statements.

    By their nature, forward-looking statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, some of which are beyond our control, including general economic conditions, volatility in market prices for crude oil, NGL and natural gas, risks and impacts of tariffs (or other retaliatory trade measures) imposed by Canada or the U.S. (or other countries) on exports and/or imports into and out of such countries, inflation and supply chain issues, the impacts of the ongoing Middle-East conflicts, Russia-Ukraine war (and any associated sanctions) and actions taken by OPEC+ on the global economy and commodity prices, geopolitical instability, political instability, industry conditions, volatility of commodity prices, future production levels, future capital expenditure levels, currency fluctuations, imprecision of reserve estimates, royalties, environmental risks, taxation, regulation, changes in tax or other legislation, competition from other industry participants, inaccurate assumptions on supply and demand factors affecting the consumption of crude oil, NGLs and natural gas, inaccurate expectations for industry drilling levels on our royalty lands, the failure to complete acquisitions on the timing and terms expected, the failure to satisfy conditions of closing for any acquisitions, the lack of availability of qualified personnel or management, stock market volatility, our inability to come to agreement with third parties on prospective opportunities and the results of any such agreement and our ability to access sufficient capital from internal and external sources. Risks are described in more detail in our Annual Information Form for the year-ended December 31, 2024, available at www.sedarplus.ca.

    With respect to forward-looking statements contained in this news release, we have made assumptions regarding, among other things, future commodity prices, future capital expenditure levels, future production levels, future exchange rates, future tax rates, future legislation, the cost of developing and producing our assets, the quality of our counterparties and the plans thereof, our ability and the ability of our lessees to obtain equipment in a timely manner to carry out development activities, our ability to market our oil and gas successfully to current and new customers, the performance of current wells and future wells drilled by our royalty payors, our expectation for the consumption of crude oil and natural gas, our expectation for industry drilling levels, our expectation for completion of wells drilled, our ability to obtain financing on acceptable terms, shut-in production, production additions from our audit function, our ability to execute on prospective opportunities and our ability to add production and reserves through development and acquisition activities. Additional operating assumptions with respect to the forward-looking statements referred to above are detailed in the body of this news release.

    You are cautioned that the assumptions used in the preparation of such information, although considered reasonable at the time of preparation, may prove to be imprecise and, as such, undue reliance should not be placed on forward-looking statements. Our actual results, performance, or achievement could differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, these forward-looking statements. We can give no assurance that any of the events anticipated will transpire or occur, or if any of them do, what benefits we will derive from them. The forward-looking information contained in this document is expressly qualified by this cautionary statement. To the extent any guidance or forward-looking statements herein constitute a financial outlook, they are included herein to provide readers with an understanding of management’s plans and assumptions for budgeting purposes and readers are cautioned that the information may not be appropriate for other purposes. Our policy for updating forward-looking statements is to update our key operating assumptions quarterly and, except as required by law, we do not undertake to update any other forward-looking statements.

    You are further cautioned that the preparation of financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), which are the Canadian generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for publicly accountable enterprises, requires management to make certain judgments and estimates that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses. These estimates may change, having either a positive or negative effect on net income, as further information becomes available and as the economic environment changes.

    To the extent any guidance or forward-looking statements herein constitutes a financial outlook, they are included herein to provide readers with an understanding of management’s plans and assumptions for budgeting purposes and readers are cautioned that the information may not be appropriate for other purposes. You are further cautioned that the preparation of financial statements in accordance with IFRS requires management to make certain judgments and estimates that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses. These estimates may change, having either a positive or negative effect on net income, as further information becomes available and as the economic environment changes.

    Conversion of Natural Gas to Barrels of Oil Equivalent (BOE)

    To provide a single unit of production for analytical purposes, natural gas production and reserves volumes are converted mathematically to equivalent barrels of oil (boe). We use the industry-accepted standard conversion of six thousand cubic feet of natural gas to one barrel of oil (6 Mcf = 1 bbl). The 6:1 boe ratio is based on an energy equivalency conversion method primarily applicable at the burner tip. It does not represent a value equivalency at the wellhead and is not based on either energy content or current prices. While the boe ratio is useful for comparative measures and observing trends, it does not accurately reflect individual product values and might be misleading, particularly if used in isolation. As well, given that the value ratio, based on the current price of crude oil to natural gas, is significantly different from the 6:1 energy equivalency ratio, using a 6:1 conversion ratio may be misleading as an indication of value.

    Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures

    Within this news release, references are made to terms commonly used as key performance indicators in the oil and gas industry, which do not have any standardized means prescribed by Canadian generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). We believe that net revenue, netback, dividend payout ratio, funds from operations per share and cash costs are useful non-GAAP financial measures and ratios for management and investors to analyze operating performance, financial leverage, and liquidity, and we use these terms to facilitate the understanding and comparability of our results of operations. However, these as terms do not have any standardized meanings prescribed by GAAP, such terms may not be comparable with the calculations of similar measures for other entities. This news release also contains the capital management measures net debt and net debt to trailing funds from operations, as defined in note 14 to the unaudited consolidated financial statements as at and for the three months ended June 30, 2025.

    Net revenue, which is calculated as revenues less ad valorem and production taxes (as incurred in the U.S. at the state level, largely Texas, which do not charge corporate income taxes but do assess flat tax rates on commodity revenues in addition to property tax assessments) details the net amount Freehold receives from its royalty payors, largely after state withholdings.

    The netback, which is also calculated on a boe basis, as average realized price less production and ad valorem taxes, operating expenses, general and administrative expense, cash-based management fees, cash-based interest charges and share-based payouts, represents the per boe netback amount which allows us to benchmark how changes in commodity pricing, net of production and ad valorem taxes, and our cash-based cost structure compare against prior periods.

    Cash costs, which is calculated on a boe basis, is comprised by the recurring cash-based costs, excluding taxes, reported on the statements of operations. For Freehold, cash costs are identified as operating expense, general and administrative expense, cash-based interest charges, cash-based management fees and share-based compensation payouts. Cash costs allow Freehold to benchmark how changes in its manageable cash-based cost structure compare against prior periods.

    The following table presents the computation of Net Revenue, Cash costs and the Netback:

    $/boe Q2-2025 Q1-2025 Q2-2024
    Royalty and other revenue 51.87 62.29 60.99
    Production and ad valorem taxes (1.81) (2.28) (1.75)
    Net revenue $50.06 $60.01 $59.24
    Less:      
    General and administrative expense (2.79) (3.41) (2.86)
    Operating expense (0.13) (0.13) (0.24)
    Interest and financing cash expense (2.95) (3.31) (2.87)
    Management fee-cash settled (0.01) (0.05) (0.05)
    Cash payout on share-based compensation (1.50) (0.10) (3.78)
    Cash costs (7.38) (7.00) ($9.80)
    Netback $42.68 $53.01 $49.44


    Dividend payout
    ratios are often used for dividend paying companies in the oil and gas industry to identify dividend levels in relation to funds from operations that are also used to finance debt repayments and/or acquisition opportunities. Dividend payout ratio is a supplementary measure and is calculated as dividends paid as a percentage of funds from operations.

           
    ($000s, except as noted) Q2-2025 Q1-2025 Q2-2024
    Dividends paid $44,270 $44,269 $40,686
    Funds from operations $56,600 $68,050 $59,569
    Dividend payout ratio (%) 78% 65% 68%


    Funds from operations per share,
    which is calculated as funds from operations divided by the weighted average shares outstanding during the period, provides direction if changes in commodity prices, cash costs, and/or acquisitions were accretive on a per share basis. Funds from operations per share is a supplementary measure.

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: Appointment of Director to the Board

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Golar LNG Limited (“Golar”) (Nasdaq: “GLNG”) is pleased to announce that effective August 1, 2025, Mr. Stephen J. Schaefer will join its Board of Directors.

    Mr. Schaefer brings extensive experience in the natural gas and electricity markets, having been actively involved in the sector since 1993. Mr. Schaefer currently serves as Chairman of the Board of Talen Energy Corporation, as a member of the Board of Directors for GenOn Energy and as a Senior Advisor of EverGen Power LLC. His previous roles include Chairman of GenOn Energy and Texgen Power LLC and as a member of the Board of Directors for Homer City Holdings LLC and Element Markets LLC. Prior to retiring in 2015, he was a Partner with Riverstone Holdings, a private equity firm focused on energy investing. Previously, Mr. Schaefer was a Managing Director with Huron Consulting Group, where he founded and headed its Energy Practice. From 1998 to 2003 Mr. Schaefer was Managing Director and Vice President of Duke Energy North America, responsible for mergers and acquisitions. Mr. Schaefer is a Chartered Financial Analyst and holds a B.S., magna cum laude, in Finance and Accounting from Northeastern University.

    Commenting on the appointment, Mr. Troim, Chairman of the Board, said: “We are honoured to welcome Mr. Schaefer to the Board. His deep expertise in global energy markets combined with a sharp strategic vision and well-established industry credibility will be instrumental in advancing Golar’s growth ambitions. We look forward to the valuable insights and leadership he will bring.”

    Hamilton, Bermuda
    July 30, 2025

    This information is subject to the disclosure requirements pursuant to Section 5-12 the Norwegian Securities Trading Act

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: Climb Global Solutions Reports Second Quarter 2025 Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    EATONTOWN, N.J., July 30, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Climb Global Solutions, Inc. (NASDAQ:CLMB) (“Climb” or the “Company”), a value-added global IT channel company providing unique sales and distribution solutions for innovative technology vendors, is reporting results for the second quarter ended June 30, 2025.

    Second Quarter 2025 Summary vs. Same Year-Ago Quarter

    • Net sales increased 73% to $159.3 million.
    • Net income increased 74% to $6.0 million or $1.30 per diluted share.
    • Adjusted net income (a non-GAAP financial measure defined below) increased 68% to $6.4 million or $1.39 per diluted share.
    • Adjusted EBITDA (a non-GAAP financial measure defined below) increased 64% to $11.4 million.
    • Gross billings (a key operational metric defined below) increased 39% to $500.6 million. Distribution segment gross billings increased 40% to $477.0 million, and Solutions segment gross billings increased 19% to $23.5 million.

    Management Commentary

    “We continued to execute on our core initiatives in Q2, resulting in another period of exceptional performance with material increases across all key financial metrics,” said CEO Dale Foster. “During the quarter, we generated double-digit organic growth by strengthening relationships with key customers, bolstering our line card with new, innovative vendors, and growing our market share in both the U.S. and Europe. We also benefited from the incremental contribution and seasonal strength of Douglas Stewart Software & Services, LLC (“DSS”), which typically sees higher demand from education customers as they ramp ahead of the next school year.

    “Looking ahead, we will continue to build on the momentum established in the first half of the year, with a clear focus on driving sustainable growth and operational execution. With our ERP system now fully implemented, we expect to capture operational efficiencies that will enhance scalability and drive operating leverage across our global platform. We also remain focused on identifying strategic acquisition opportunities that can enhance our capabilities and complement our existing footprint. These initiatives, coupled with our robust balance sheet and demonstrated track record of success, will enable us to deliver on both our organic and inorganic growth objectives in 2025 and beyond.”

    Dividend

    Subsequent to quarter end, on July 29, 2025, Climb’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share of its common stock payable on August 15, 2025, to shareholders of record on August 11, 2025.

    Second Quarter 2025 Financial Results

    Net sales in the second quarter of 2025 increased 73% to $159.3 million compared to $92.1 million for the same period in 2024. This reflects double digit organic growth from new and existing vendors, as well as contribution from the Company’s acquisition of DSS on July 31, 2024. In addition, gross billings in the second quarter of 2025 increased 39% to $500.6 million compared to $359.8 million in the year-ago period.

    Gross profit in the second quarter of 2025 increased 42% to $26.3 million compared to $18.6 million for the same period in 2024. The increase was driven by organic growth from new and existing vendors in both North America and Europe, as well as contribution from DSS.

    Selling, general, and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses in the second quarter of 2025 were $16.4 million compared to $13.0 million in the year-ago period. DSS represented $0.9 million of the increase. SG&A as a percentage of gross billings decreased to 3.3% for the second quarter of 2025 compared to 3.6% in the year-ago period.

    Net income in the second quarter of 2025 increased 74% to $6.0 million or $1.30 per diluted share, compared to $3.4 million or $0.75 per diluted share for the same period in 2024. Adjusted net income increased 68% to $6.4 million or $1.39 per diluted share, compared to $3.8 million or $0.83 per diluted share for the year-ago period.

    Adjusted EBITDA in the second quarter of 2025 increased 64% to $11.4 million compared to $6.9 million for the same period in 2024. The increase was primarily driven by organic growth from both new and existing vendors, as well as contribution from the Company’s acquisition of DSS. Effective margin, which is defined as adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of gross profit, increased 600 basis points to 43.3% compared to 37.3% for the same period in 2024.

    On June 30, 2025, cash and cash equivalents were $28.6 million compared to $29.8 million on December 31, 2024, while working capital increased by $12.2 million during this period. The decrease in cash was primarily attributed to the timing of receivable collections and payables. Climb had $0.5 million of outstanding debt on June 30, 2025, with no borrowings outstanding under its $50 million revolving credit facility.

    For more information on the non-GAAP financial measures discussed in this press release, please see the section titled, “Non-GAAP Financial Measures,” and the reconciliations of non-GAAP financial measures to their nearest comparable GAAP financial measures at the end of this press release.

    Conference Call

    The Company will conduct a conference call tomorrow, July 31, 2025, at 8:30 a.m. Eastern time to discuss its results for the second quarter ended June 30, 2025.

    Climb management will host the conference call, followed by a question-and-answer period.

    Date: Thursday, July 31, 2025
    Time: 8:30 a.m. Eastern time
    Toll-free dial-in number: (800) 225-9448
    International dial-in number: (203) 518-9708
    Conference ID: CLIMB
    Webcast: Climb’s Q2 2025 Conference Call

    If you have any difficulty registering or connecting with the conference call, please contact Elevate IR at (720) 330-2829.

    The conference call will also be available for replay on the investor relations section of the Company’s website at www.climbglobalsolutions.com.

    About Climb Global Solutions

    Climb Global Solutions, Inc. (NASDAQ:CLMB) is a value-added global IT distribution and solutions company specializing in emerging and innovative technologies. Climb operates across the U.S., Canada and Europe through multiple business units, including Climb Channel Solutions, Grey Matter and Climb Global Services. The Company provides IT distribution and solutions for companies in the Security, Data Management, Connectivity, Storage & HCI, Virtualization & Cloud, and Software & ALM industries.

    Additional information can be found by visiting www.climbglobalsolutions.com.

    Non-GAAP Financial Measures

    Climb Global Solutions uses non-GAAP financial measures, including adjusted net income and adjusted EBITDA, as supplemental measures of the performance of the Company’s business. Use of these financial measures has limitations, and you should not consider them in isolation or use them as substitutes for analysis of Climb’s financial results under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). The attached tables provide definitions of these measures and a reconciliation of each non-GAAP financial measure to the most nearly comparable measure under U.S. GAAP.

    Key Operational Metric

    Gross Billings

    Gross billings are the total dollar value of customer purchases of goods and services during the period, net of customer returns and credit memos, sales, or other taxes. Gross billings include the transaction values for certain sales transactions that are recognized on a net basis, and, therefore, includes amounts that will not be recognized as revenue. We use gross billings as an operational metric to assess the volume of transactions or market share for our business as well as to understand changes in our accounts receivable and accounts payable. We believe gross billings will aid investors in the same manner.

    Forward-Looking Statements

    The statements in this release, other than statements of historical fact, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and are intended to come within the safe harbor protection provided by those sections. These forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties. Many of the forward-looking statements may be identified by words such as ”look forward,” “believes,” “expects,” “intends,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “estimates,” “projects,” “forecasts,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “will,” “confident,” “may,” “can,” “potential,” “possible,” “proposed,” “in process,” “under construction,” “in development,” “opportunity,” “target,” “outlook,” “maintain,” “continue,” “goal,” “aim,” “commit,” or similar expressions, or when we discuss our priorities, strategy, goals, vision, mission, opportunities, projections, intentions or expectations. In this press release, the forward-looking statements relate to, among other things, declaring and reaffirming our strategic goals, future operating results, and the effects and potential benefits of the strategic acquisition on our business. Factors, among others, that could cause actual results and events to differ materially from those described in any forward-looking statements include, without limitation, our ability to recognize the anticipated benefits of the acquisition of Douglas Stewart Software & Services, LLC, the continued acceptance of the Company’s distribution channel by vendors and customers, the timely availability and acceptance of new products, product mix, market conditions, competitive pricing pressures, the successful integration of acquisitions, contribution of key vendor relationships and support programs, inflation, import and export tariffs, interest rate risk and impact thereof, as well as factors that affect the software industry in general. The forward-looking statements contained herein are also subject generally to other risks and uncertainties that are described in the section entitled “Risk Factors” contained in Item 1A. of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, and from time to time in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

    Company Contact

    Matthew Sullivan
    Chief Financial Officer
    (732) 847-2451
    MatthewS@ClimbCS.com

    Investor Relations Contact

    Sean Mansouri, CFA or Aaron D’Souza
    Elevate IR
    (720) 330-2829
    CLMB@elevate-ir.com

             
    CLIMB GLOBAL SOLUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
      (Unaudited)
    (Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
             
        June 30,
    2025
      December 31,
    2024
             
    ASSETS
             
    Current assets      
      Cash and cash equivalents $ 28,587     $ 29,778  
      Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $693 and $588, respectively   289,083       341,597  
      Inventory, net   3,349       2,447  
      Prepaid expenses and other current assets   9,164       6,874  
    Total current assets   330,183       380,696  
             
    Equipment and leasehold improvements, net   13,626       12,853  
    Goodwill   37,270       34,924  
    Other intangibles, net   35,718       36,550  
    Right-of-use assets, net   1,509       1,965  
    Accounts receivable long-term, net   1,209       1,174  
    Other assets   649       824  
    Deferred income tax assets   527       193  
             
    Total assets $ 420,691     $ 469,179  
             
    LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
             
    Current liabilities      
      Accounts payable and accrued expenses $ 307,715     $ 370,397  
      Lease liability, current portion   727       654  
      Term loan, current portion   474       560  
    Total current liabilities   308,916       371,611  
             
      Lease liability, net of current portion   1,116       1,685  
      Deferred income tax liabilities   5,101       4,723  
      Term loan, net of current portion         191  
      Non-current liabilities   381       381  
             
    Total liabilities   315,514       378,591  
             
             
    Stockholders’ equity      
      Common stock, $.01 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized, 5,284,500 shares      
      issued, and 4,617,206 and 4,601,302 shares outstanding, respectively   53       53  
      Additional paid-in capital   40,043       37,977  
      Treasury stock, at cost, 667,294 and 683,198 shares, respectively   (14,266 )     (13,337 )
      Retained earnings   76,904       68,787  
      Accumulated other comprehensive gain (loss)   2,443       (2,892 )
    Total stockholders’ equity   105,177       90,588  
    Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $ 420,691     $ 469,179  
             
    CLIMB GLOBAL SOLUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
    (Unaudited)
    (Amounts in thousands, except per share data)
                       
          Six months ended   Three months ended
          June 30,   June 30,
           2025     2024     2025     2024 
                       
    Net Sales   $ 297,328     $ 184,498     $ 159,284     $ 92,076  
                       
    Cost of sales     247,624       148,921       132,976       73,518  
                       
    Gross profit     49,704       35,577       26,308       18,558  
                       
                       
    Selling, general and administrative expenses     33,112       25,496       16,357       12,974  
    Depreciation & amortization expense     3,720       1,736       1,982       865  
    Acquisition related costs     139       592       13       469  
    Total selling, general and administrative expenses     36,971       27,824       18,352       14,308  
                       
    Income from operations     12,733       7,753       7,956       4,250  
                       
    Interest, net     337       557       151       354  
    Foreign currency transaction loss     (567 )     (246 )     14       (162 )
    Change in fair value of acquisition contingent consideration   (515 )           (379 )      
    Income before provision for income taxes     11,988       8,064       7,742       4,442  
    Provision for income taxes     2,338       1,903       1,774       1,012  
                       
    Net income   $ 9,650     $ 6,161     $ 5,968     $ 3,430  
                       
    Income per common share – Basic   $ 2.11     $ 1.35     $ 1.30     $ 0.75  
    Income per common share – Diluted   $ 2.11     $ 1.35     $ 1.30     $ 0.75  
                       
    Weighted average common shares outstanding – Basic     4,509       4,449       4,521       4,461  
    Weighted average common shares outstanding – Diluted     4,509       4,449       4,521       4,461  
                       
    Dividends paid per common share   $ 0.34     $ 0.34     $ 0.17     $ 0.17  
                       
              
    Reconciliation of GAAP and Non-GAAP Financial Measures (unaudited)            
    (Amounts in thousands, except per share data)                
                       
      The table below presents net income reconciled to adjusted EBITDA (Non-GAAP) (1):
                       
          Six months ended   Three months ended
          June 30,   June 30,   June 30,   June 30,
           2025     2024     2025     2024 
                       
    Net income   $ 9,650     $ 6,161     $ 5,968     $ 3,430  
      Provision for income taxes     2,338       1,903       1,774       1,012  
      Depreciation and amortization     3,720       1,736       1,982       865  
      Interest expense     159       161       90       60  
    EBITDA     15,867       9,961       9,814       5,367  
      Share-based compensation     2,496       1,906       1,173       1,084  
      Acquisition related costs     139       592       13       469  
      Change in fair value of acquisition contingent consideration   515             379        
    Adjusted EBITDA   $ 19,017     $ 12,459     $ 11,379     $ 6,920  
                       
                       
          Six months ended   Three months ended
          June 30,   June 30,   June 30,   June 30,
    Components of interest, net    2025     2024     2025     2024 
                       
      Amortization of discount on accounts receivable with extended payment terms   $ (23 )   $ (17 )   $ (11 )   $ (11 )
      Interest income     (473 )     (701 )     (230 )     (403 )
      Interest expense     159       161       90       60  
    Interest, net   $ (337 )   $ (557 )   $ (151 )   $ (354 )
                       
    (1) We define adjusted EBITDA, as net income, plus provision for income taxes, depreciation, amortization, share-based compensation, interest, acquisition related costs and change in fair value of acquisition contingent consideration. We define effective margin as adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of gross profit. We provided a reconciliation of adjusted EBITDA to net income, which is the most directly comparable US GAAP measure. We use adjusted EBITDA as a supplemental measure of our performance to gain insight into our businesses profitability, operating performance and performance trends, and to provide management and investors a useful measure for period-to-period comparisons by excluding items that management believes are not reflective of our underlying operating performance. Accordingly, we believe that Adjusted EBITDA provides useful information to investors and others in understanding and evaluating our operating results. Adjusted EBITDA is also a component to our financial covenants in our credit facility. Our use of adjusted EBITDA has limitations, and you should not consider it in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of our financial results as reported under US GAAP. In addition, other companies, including companies in our industry, might calculate adjusted EBITDA, or similarly titled measures differently, which may reduce their usefulness as comparative measures.          
                       
      The table below presents net income reconciled to adjusted net income (Non-GAAP) (2):
                       
          Six months ended   Three months ended
        June 30,   June 30,   June 30,   June 30,
         2025     2024     2025     2024 
                       
      Net income   $ 9,650     $ 6,161     $ 5,968     $ 3,430  
      Acquisition related costs, net of income taxes     104       444       10       352  
      Change in fair value of acquisition contingent consideration   515             379        
      Adjusted net income   $ 10,269     $ 6,605     $ 6,357     $ 3,782  
                       
      Adjusted net income per common share – diluted   $ 2.25     $ 1.45     $ 1.39     $ 0.83  
                       
    (2) We define adjusted net income as net income excluding acquisition related costs, net of income taxes and the change in fair value of acquisition contingent consideration. We provided a reconciliation of adjusted net income to net income, which is the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measure. We use adjusted net income and adjusted net income per common share as supplemental measures of our performance to gain insight into our businesses profitability, operating performance and performance trends, and to provide management and investors a useful measure for period-to-period comparisons by excluding items that management believes are not reflective of our underlying operating performance. Accordingly, we believe that adjusted net income and adjust net income per common share provide useful information to investors and others in understanding and evaluating our operating results. Our use of adjusted net income has limitations, and you should not consider it in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of our financial results as reported under U.S. GAAP. In addition, other companies, including companies in our industry, might calculate adjusted net income, or similarly titled measures differently, which may reduce their usefulness as comparative measures.
                       
      The table below presents the operational metric of gross billings by segment (3):
                       
          Six months ended   Three months ended
        June 30,   June 30,   June 30,   June 30,
         2025     2024     2025     2024 
                       
      Distribution gross billings   $ 930,619     $ 674,704     $ 477,043     $ 340,067  
      Solutions gross billings     44,531       40,406       23,510       19,774  
      Total gross billings   $ 975,150     $ 715,110     $ 500,553     $ 359,841  
                       
    (3) Gross billings are the total dollar value of customer purchases of goods and services during the period, net of customer returns and credit memos, sales, or other taxes. Gross billings include the transaction values for certain sales transactions that are recognized on a net basis, and, therefore, include amounts that will not be recognized as revenue. We use gross billings as an operational metric to assess the volume of transactions or market share for our business as well as to understand changes in our accounts receivable and accounts payable. We believe gross billings will aid investors in the same manner.

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI USA: Coons, Schumer, Murray, Shaheen, Reed, Warner, Schatz, Kaine, Duckworth, Kelly, Bennet, Slotkin, Kim release joint statement to raise alarm about President Trump’s steep concessions to Beijing

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Delaware Christopher Coons

    WASHINGTON – Today, Ranking Senate Defense Appropriator Chris Coons (D-Del.), Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), Senate Appropriations Vice Chair Patty Murray (D-Wash.), Senate Foreign Relations Committee Ranking Member Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.), Senate Armed Services Ranking Member Jack Reed (D-R.I.), Senate Intelligence Committee Vice Chairman Mark Warner (D-Va.), Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on State and Foreign Operations Ranking Member Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii), Senate Foreign Relations Committee member Tim Kaine (D-Va.), Senate Foreign Relations Committee member Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.), Senate Armed Services Committee member Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.), Senate Intelligence Committee member Michael Bennet (D-Colo.), Senate Armed Services Committee member Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.), and Senate Subcommittee on National Security and International Trade and Finance Ranking Member Andy Kim (D-N.J.) released the following statement about public reporting that President Trump is pausing export controls on critical technology sold to China as part of an effort to secure a trade deal with Beijing:

    “President Trump has spent the past six months eroding our advantages over China, but recent developments make clear how willing his administration is to sacrifice American economic and technological leadership for symbolic “wins” with China in its self-inflicted trade war.

    “In just the last two days, we have seen reporting that the Trump administration has cancelled a long-planned high-level security dialogue with Taiwan and denied the president of Taiwan the ability to transit the United States—a longstanding tradition respected by administrations of both parties. These developments come right on the heels of a decision to pave the way for the sale of advanced AI chips to China and to freeze export controls on additional American technologies enabling them to now flow to China, even as Beijing tightens export controls on the United States. Independent media reports today suggest these moves are an attempt to secure trade concessions, curry favor with President Xi Jinping, and ensure President Trump gets a visit to China. The president is demonstrating to Beijing that he can be cajoled into giving up America’s core interests.

    “In the face of lackluster domestic economic forecasts and anemic interest from Beijing in achieving a real breakthrough in talks, President Trump and his economic team have ceded leverage and negotiating power to Beijing in a desperate attempt to lure President Xi to a meeting with President Trump. Even more dangerously, they risk putting American national security, technological advantage, and economic prosperity on the chopping block in order to do so.

    “President Trump is handing our primary geopolitical adversary the keys to the castle of 21st century global technological dominance. Doing so will enable Chinese leadership in artificial intelligence, infusing the Chinese military with the technological advantage it needs to continue hostile operations across the globe. He is signaling his ambivalence about standing with Taiwan, our long-term partner in the region and a powerhouse of the global economy. And he is emboldening Beijing to take aggressive actions and seek even more aggressive concessions in whatever trade negotiations may follow.

    “President Trump and this administration must reset their dangerously weak approach to China and make clear they will no longer accept symbolic wins in exchange for steep American concessions. An administration convinced it can renegotiate the world order needs to stop negotiating against itself.”

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Senators Coons, Cornyn’s bill to equip law enforcement with trauma kits passes Senate

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Delaware Christopher Coons

    WASHINGTON – U.S. Senators Chris Coons (D-Del.), John Cornyn (R-Texas), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), Mike Rounds (R-S.D.), and Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) released the following statements after their Improving Police Critical Aid for Responding to Emergencies (CARE) Act, which would equip law enforcement officers with quality trauma kits so they can respond immediately if a civilian or fellow officer experiences a traumatic injury during a call, passed the Senate:

    “Our nation’s law enforcement officers keep our communities safe, and all Americans are better off when they have the resources they need to do their jobs when emergencies strike,” said Senator Coons. “As co-chair of the Senate Law Enforcement Caucus, I’m proud that my colleagues passed this bipartisan, commonsense legislation so that police officers have the trauma kits they need to save lives.”

    “When responding to medical emergencies, time and access to the right tools can mean the difference between life and death,” said Senator Cornyn. “This legislation would equip law enforcement officers with high-quality trauma kits to prevent deaths due to blood loss and give patients the best chance of survival.”

    “Police officers serve on the frontlines in their communities every day, and they are often first on the scene in medical emergencies,” said Senator Whitehouse. “Our bipartisan legislation would provide officers in the field with emergency trauma kits, and fund standardized training to allow them to better protect the public and save lives.”

    “As a strong supporter of our brave men and women in law enforcement, I am proud to co-introduce the Improving Police CARE Act which would equip them with the tools they need to keep our communities safe,” said Senator Tillis. “Ensuring law enforcement officers have effective trauma kits will save countless law enforcement and civilian lives.”

    “As the first people to arrive at the scene of an emergency, law enforcement officers must be prepared for anything and properly equipped to respond,” said Senator Rounds. “Our legislation would support equipping officers with trauma kits to control life-threatening hemorrhages in an emergency situation. This bill has the potential to save lives, and I’m pleased that it has passed the Senate.”

    “It is imperative that law enforcement officers have the resources and training they need to save lives,” said Senator Durbin. “Blood loss injuries are too often deadly, especially in rural areas where it can take longer for patients to receive emergency medical care. The bipartisan Improving Police CARE Act will establish standards for trauma kits used by law enforcement, ensuring that our officers have the right tools to respond to injuries immediately and continue to serve our communities.”

    U.S. Senators Ashley Moody (R-Fla.) and Maggie Hassan (D-N.H.) are cosponsors of the legislation.

    Background:

    Trauma kits play a vital role in preventing deaths due to blood loss. Between 30-40% of trauma-related deaths are caused by hemorrhaging, or uncontrolled bleeding, with 33-56% of them occurring before the patient arrives at the hospital. During the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts, tourniquets and tourniquet training were widely adopted by the military for their lifesaving potential in combat. This practice has since been embraced in civilian populations given its clear survival benefit. In fact, one study found that patient survival was six times more likely when a tourniquet was used, underscoring the critical need for timely bleeding control. This is especially true in rural areas where the average EMS response time is typically double that of urban areas. Having access to a trauma kit and early bleeding control can help bridge this gap and mean the difference between life and death.

    The effectiveness of a law enforcement trauma kit program depends in part on the contents and the quality of the kits. Medical professionals recommend that a kit include bleeding control supplies like tourniquets, bandages, non-latex gloves, scissors, and instructions. However, there is enormous variation in the products available on the market.

    The Improving Police Critical Aid for Responding to Emergencies (CARE) Act would:

    • Establish baseline standards in consultation with law enforcement and medical professionals for trauma kits purchased using grant funding under the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG)
    • And require the development of optional best practices that law enforcement agencies can adapt for training law enforcement officers to use trauma kits, and for deployment and maintenance of the kits in vehicles and government facilities

    The legislation is endorsed by the National Association of Police Organizations (NAPO), International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP), Major County Sheriffs of America (MCSA), Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association (FLEOA), NYPD Sergeants Benevolent Association (SBA), National Fraternal Order of Police (FOP), the Society of Trauma Nurses, the American College of Surgeons (ACS), and the American Trauma Society.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Senate Banking Committee Unanimously Advances Comprehensive Housing Legislation

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Idaho Mike Crapo

    Washington, D.C.–The U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, of which U.S. Senator Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) is a senior member, unanimously advanced the Renewing Opportunity in the American Dream (ROAD) to Housing Act of 2025. Senator Crapo is a co-sponsor of the legislation, which was led by Committee Chairman Tim Scott (R-South Carolina) and Ranking Member Elizabeth Warren (D-Massachusetts).

    “Homes are the foundation for economic success, family stability and community cohesiveness,” said Crapo. “Unfortunately, lack of affordable housing is routinely the number one concern I hear from Idahoans. We must reform inefficient segments of U.S. housing across all markets to make the American dream of homeownership more attainable.”

    The comprehensive housing package would take various steps to increase access to affordable housing for Americans across the country by expanding and preserving the housing supply, improving housing affordability, and increasing oversight and efficiency of federal regulators and housing programs. The measure contains several provisions Senator Crapo co-sponsored as standalone bills, including:

    Text of the bill is available here, and a section-by-section summary is available here.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: Haitians in ‘despair’ following abrupt suspension of US humanitarian support

    Source: United Nations 2

    The cancellation of most US funding in January means many services to the most vulnerable people have been cut or put on hold.

    Multiple political, security and socio-economic crises have led to 5.7 million people suffering from a lack of food and have forced 1.3 million people to flee their homes.

    With a dramatic reduction in funding Haiti faces a crucial “turning point.”

    UN News spoke to OCHA’s country director, Modibo Traore, about the current situation.

    UN News: What is the current state of humanitarian funding in Haiti?

    Humanitarian funding in Haiti is going through a critical phase, marked by a growing gap between the needs and available resources. As of 1 July, only around 8 per cent of the $908 million required had been mobilized.

    This partial coverage only allows a fraction of the 3.6 million people targeted to be reached.

    © UNICEF/Maxime Le Lijour

    UN aid agencies continue to support Haitian people with humanitarian aid.

    The sectors most affected are food security, access to drinking water, primary healthcare, education and protection.

    This contraction in international support is part of a global context of multiple competing crises – Ukraine, Gaza, Sudan – but also reflects a loss of political interest in the Haitian issue.

    UN News: What conditions in Haiti have led to such significant funding needs?

    The growing humanitarian needs observed in Haiti are the result of an accumulation of structural and cyclical factors. On the socioeconomic front, multidimensional poverty affects a large part of the population.

    Haiti’s exposure to natural hazards is an aggravating factor.

    The country has experienced several major hurricanes that struck the southern region less than a week after an earthquake that severely affected the area, not to mention repeated droughts that have had a major impact on agriculture and livestock farming.

    © UNOCHA/Giles Clarke

    The downtown area of Port-au-Prince remains extremely dangerous due to gang activity.

    Since 2019, a new dimension has emerged; chronic insecurity caused by the proliferation of armed groups, particularly in the capital, Port-au-Prince, and now in the Centre and Artibonite departments.

    In 2024, the multidimensional crisis that has been shaking Haiti for years has become catastrophic.

    The level of violence and insecurity remains high, with devastating consequences for the population, including massive displacement of people who were already in vulnerable situations.

    UN News: How has the growing control of armed groups affected donor confidence?

    The rise of armed groups in Haiti and their increasing control of strategic locations, particularly major roads and ports of entry to the capital, is a major obstacle to the safe and efficient delivery of humanitarian aid.

    This dynamic has an impact on the risk perception of international donors, who now assess Haiti as a high-threat environment for intervention. Access to beneficiaries has become irregular in many areas.

    The deterioration of the security situation represents a major challenge for mobilizing and maintaining financial commitments.

    Donors have expressed concerns about operational risks, particularly regarding securing supply chains, preventing exploitation and ensuring accountability.

    The operational cost of aid has also increased.

    UN News: What is the impact of the new approach taken by the US administration?

    On 20 January, 2025, President Donald Trump signed Executive Order 14169, which imposed an immediate suspension of all new foreign funding by US federal agencies, including humanitarian programs run by USAID and multilateral partners.

    In the case of Haiti, the effects were felt through the sudden halt of approximately 80 per cent of US-funded programmes. NGO partner staff were laid off, payments were suspended, and supply chains were disrupted.

    © WFP/Theresa Piorr

    US food aid is prepared for delivery following floods in Haiti in 2022.

    Beyond the structural effects, this suspension created profound uncertainty in the Haitian humanitarian system. This situation not only weakened the continuity of essential services but also affected trust between beneficiary communities and humanitarian actors.

    UN News: To what extent is the current situation unprecedented?

    The year 2025 marks a turning point in humanitarian aid in Haiti. This crisis is not the result of a single or isolated event, but rather a series of deteriorating situations in the context of gradually waning international attention.

    The interruption of US programmes has acted as a catalyst for the crisis. USAID’s technical partners, many of whom managed community health programmes in vulnerable neighbourhoods, have ceased operations, depriving hundreds of thousands of people of vital services.

    US-co-funded health centres have closed, leaving pregnant women and children without assistance.

    The current crisis demonstrates the country’s growing isolation.

    While previous crises had prompted rapid international solidarity, the humanitarian response to the situation in 2025 has been slow and partial.

    UN News: What difficult decisions have had to be made regarding cutting aid?

    The interruption of funding has forced humanitarian organizations to make ethically complex and often painful trade-offs.

    In the area of protection, for example, safe spaces for women and girls have been drastically reduced.

    © MINUSTAH/Logan Abassi

    The long-term development of Haiti is at risk as funding decreases.

    Cash transfer programmes, widely used in urban areas since 2021, have also been suspended. These programmes enabled vulnerable households to maintain a minimum level of food security. Their suspension has led to a resurgence of coping mechanisms such as child labour, less food and children being taken out of school.

    Resilience-building activities have also been affected. Programmes combining food security, urban agriculture, and access to water—often co-financed by USAID and UN funds—have been frozen.

    This compromises not only the immediate response but also the development of medium-term solutions.

    UN News: How are Haitians being affected?

    Children are among the hardest hit. UNICEF and its partners have treated more than 4,600 children suffering from severe acute malnutrition, representing only 3.6 per cent of the 129,000 children expected to need treatment this year.

    The proportion of institutional maternal deaths has also increased from 250 to 350 per 100,000 live births between February 2022 and April 2025.

    © PAHO/WHO/David Lorens Mentor

    A survivor of rape rests at a site for internally displaced people in Port-au-Prince.

    In terms of security, the effects are equally worrying. Gender-based sexual violence (GBV) has increased in neighbourhoods controlled by armed groups.

    In short, the withdrawal of US funding has led to a multidimensional regression in the rights of women and girls in Haiti, with consequences that are likely to last for several years.

    UN News: How have people in Haiti reacted?

    Beneficiaries expressed a sense of despair at the sudden suspension of the services.

    In working-class neighbourhoods of Port-au-Prince as well as in remote rural areas, the cessation of food distributions, community healthcare, and cash transfers was experienced as a breach of the moral contract between communities and humanitarian institutions.

    Humanitarian partners communicate transparently about the reduction of support, so communities are, to some extent, aware of the financial constraints.

    MIL OSI United Nations News

  • MIL-OSI Canada: Investor Alert: Impersonation Scam Uses Premier Scott Moe’s Image and Fake Social Media Posts to Target Saskatchewan People

    Source: Government of Canada regional news

    Released on July 30, 2025

    The Financial and Consumer Affairs Authority of Saskatchewan (FCAA) is warning Saskatchewan people of impersonation scams on social media claiming that Premier Scott Moe is endorsing online investment platforms.

    The FCAA informs Saskatchewan investors that Premier Scott Moe does not endorse or advertise any investment platforms.

    “Do not make investment decisions based on public figure endorsements,” FCAA Securities Division Executive Director Dean Murrison said. “Scammers can create fraudulent news and social media articles that imitate the real media source. Before you consider investing with an entity, always check the registration status at aretheyregistered.ca and do not deal with any unregistered entities.”

    The FCAA cautions investors and consumers not to send money to companies that are not registered in Saskatchewan, as they may not be legitimate businesses. 

    If you have experienced entities claiming public figure endorsements for their investment platforms or anyone claiming to be acting on their behalf, contact the FCAA’s Securities Division at 306-787-5936.

    In Saskatchewan, individuals or companies need to be registered with the FCAA to trade or sell securities or derivatives. The registration provisions of The Securities Act, 1988, and accompanying regulations are intended to ensure that only honest and knowledgeable people are registered to sell securities and derivatives and that their businesses are financially stable.

    Tips to protect yourself:

    • Always verify that the person or company is registered in Saskatchewan to sell or advise about securities or derivatives. To check registration, visit The Canadian Securities Administrators’ National Registration Search at aretheyregistered.ca.
    • Know exactly what you are investing in. Make sure you understand how the investment, product, or service works.
    • Get a second opinion and seek professional advice about the investment.
    • Do not allow unknown or unverified individuals to remotely access your computer.
    • Never make an investment decision based on a notable figure endorsement. Scammers often create fake social media posts or news articles claiming an investment is endorsed by a notable figure.

    -30-

    For more information, contact:

    MIL OSI Canada News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Lee Introduces America First Deregulation for Coastal Trade

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Utah Mike Lee

    WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Mike Lee (R-UT) introduced three pieces of legislation today to repeal and reverse the effects of the overreaching Passenger Vessel Services Act of 1886 (PVSA). Senator Lee’s three-pronged approach will strengthen America’s economy while protecting American jobs and businesses by repealing PVSA and eliminating its burdensome regulations.

    “Red tape around America’s ports is strangling our economy and boosting foreign interests,” said Senator Mike Lee. “Current law protects ships that haven’t existed for decades and creates ridiculous requirements, forcing cruise ships to take Americans to foreign ports instead of their own cities. My legislation will repeal these outdated regulations, protect American jobs, and put our economy first.”

    Background:

    The Passenger Vessel Services Act (PVSA) is an outdated regulation intended to protect America’s coastal trade and tourism by restricting the domestic waterborne transportation of passengers only to ships that are U.S.-built, U.S.-flagged, and largely U.S.-crewed and -owned. This regulation was meant to insulate America’s coastal industries from foreign competition – with one exemption for ships making stops at “distant foreign ports.”

    In practice, however, PVSA has stunted America’s economy by complicating trade practices and incentivizing foreign travel over American tourism. For example, because the United States has produced no large cruise ships in over sixty years, virtually any of these vessels moving passengers from one American port to another is essentially required by law to stop at a “distant foreign port” in order to legalize its domestic American travel. This means America is shipping its tourism economy to other countries in order to protect American-made cruise ships that no longer exist.

    Far from an America First approach, PVSA regulations favor foreign economies and special interests.

    Senator Lee’s legislation will cut through the red tape strangling America’s coastal economy by repealing PVSA, eliminating its requirement for U.S.-built vessels, and exempting large passenger ships from PVSA requirements.

    The Open America’s Ports Act:

    • Repeals the Passenger Vessel Services Act (PVSA).

    The Protecting Jobs in American Ports Act:

    • Repeals the section of PVSA barring non-U.S.-built vessels from standard treatment at American ports.

    The Safeguarding American Tourism Act:

    • Exempts large passenger vessels (those with 800 or more passenger berths) from PVSA restrictions.

    Read the full text of the legislation below:

    Open America’s Ports Act

    Protecting Jobs in American Ports Act

    Safeguarding American Tourism Act

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Cornyn Blasts Democrats for Slow-Walking Trump Nominees, Undermining American People

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Texas John Cornyn

    WASHINGTON – Today on the floor, U.S. Senator John Cornyn (R-TX) blasted Senate Democrats for their historic slow-walking of Pres. Trump’s nominees and for undermining the will of the American people and expressed his view that Senate Republicans will need to consider taking steps to speed up confirmations should Democrats not relent in their obstruction. Excerpts of Sen. Cornyn’s remarks are below, and video can be found here.

    “[My] Democratic colleagues here in the Senate have reflexively and mindlessly opposed President Trump’s nominees.”

    “We have confirmed 107 of them, while 147 lower-level but critical nominees are still waiting to be confirmed by the Senate.”

    “These include many ambassadors to key allies around the world that the Senate Foreign Relations Committee has voted out of Committee.”

    “To date, Senate Democrats have allowed voice votes or given unanimous consent on exactly zero of President Trump’s civilian nominees.”

    “Senate Democrats’ partisan obstruction is making our country less safe. It’s making American foreign policy less effective, and it’s ceding the field to our adversaries.”

    “If our Democratic colleagues do not relent on this needless and mindless obstruction, Senate Republicans will have to consider what additional steps we need to take in order to expedite this process.”

    “Our Democratic colleagues seem unwilling to accept the fact that President Trump actually won the election, receiving a mandate from the American people.”

    “We owe it to the American people, we owe it to President Trump, we owe it to these nominees who volunteered to serve their country to vote on these nominees without further delay.”

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA News: “Absolute Blockbuster”: New GDP Report Shows Explosive Growth in Trump’s Economy

    Source: US Whitehouse

    With U.S. economic growth surging in the second quarter, President Donald J. Trump has proven the so-called “experts” wrong once again as he presides over tame inflation, blue-collar wage growth, explosive job creation, and a “Made in America” boom.

    Here’s what they’re saying about today’s GDP report:

    Economist E.J. Antoni: “This GDP report, I mean, really, is an absolute blockbuster. It completely defies expectation. It is not only a good headline number, it has good internals, as well.”

    Economist Steve Moore: “This is an amazing number … We’re seeing lots of jobs. We’re seeing tame inflation. It is really a beautiful picture … It’s hard to see anything to complain about. I’m sure Democrats will find something they don’t like.”

    Bullseye Brief author Adam Johnson: “The GDP Price Index was only 2% and the expectation was 2.2%. In other words, we have an economy growing at 3%; we have inflation at 2%. That’s the best of both words, so I’m very positive on that report.”

    Job Creators Network CEO Alfredo Ortiz: “The U.S. economy grew by an annualized 3% in the second quarter of the year—yet another data point that supports an interest rate cut by the Fed. Trump’s three-legged stool is working: balancing trade, cutting taxes, and slashing regulations are creating an economic boom.”

    Navy Federal Credit Union Chief Economist Heather Long: “The word of the summer for the economy is ‘resilient.’”

    CNN’s Wolf Blitzer: “Welcome news for the U.S. economy.”

    CNN’s Matt Egan: “GDP, the broadest measure of the U.S. economy, it did rebound in the second quarter. Three percent — that is a solid number and it also beat expectations.”

    Benzinga’s Piero Cingari: “The U.S. economy roared back robustly in the second quarter, with gross domestic product rebounding well above expectations—offering President Donald Trump a timely economic victory to celebrate.”

    CNBC’s Joe Kernen: “This three percent, with the market at new highs and, really, we haven’t seen inflation go up … none of these ‘horrible things’ have happened.”

    CNBC’s Rick Santelli: “There’s no doubt that this is some success. We’re seeing more horsepower. We’re seeing better equities. Inflation? Inflation really hasn’t changed much in the last year or so.”

    Politico: “The surge in growth is a win for an administration that’s been battling widespread perceptions that Trump’s economic agenda is causing more harm than good … But for now, the GDP — the total value of all goods and services produced in the U.S. — is expanding at a healthy clip.”

    USA TODAY columnist Nicole Russell: “Thanks to President Donald Trump’s bold policies, it appears that the United States will avoid a recession this year − one that so many liberals were predicting only months ago. Will Democrats put politics aside and applaud as the American economy shows a strength and resilience that so many of them doubted? Probably not.”

    CBS News: “The number represents a surprising turnaround from the first three months of 2025 … The new data also shows consumers increased spending since the last quarter, with a growth of 1.4%, up from 0.5% from January to March.”

    ABC News: “The U.S. economy expanded more than expected as President Donald Trump’s tariffs took hold over recent months, federal government data on Wednesday showed … The reading amounted to sturdy economic growth, suggesting the economy has continued to avert a significant tariff-induced cooldown. A boost in consumer spending helped propel the economic surge.”

    CNBC: “The U.S. economy grew at a much stronger-than-expected pace in the second quarter, powered by a turnaround in the trade balance and renewed consumer strength.”

    Bloomberg: US Economy Rebounds With 3% GDP Growth

    The Wall Street Journal: “The U.S. economy grew at a 3.0% annual rate in the second quarter, exceeding expectations … Trump’s priorities, including tariffs and deportations, haven’t had a major [negative] economic impact thus far.”


    President Donald J. Trump: “2Q GDP JUST OUT: 3%, WAY BETTER THAN EXPECTED! ‘Too Late’ MUST NOW LOWER THE RATE. No Inflation! Let people buy, and refinance, their homes!”

    Vice President JD Vance: “Trump economy keeps defying the experts. Strong growth!”

    Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent: “Real GDP grew 3% in Q2, surpassing expectations. Consumer spending is up, and inflation is cooling. This is what an America First economy looks like, and the best is yet to come.”

    Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick: “GDP just surged to 3% and the Trump Economy has officially arrived. Biden’s first quarter is behind us, and growth is already accelerating. President Trump’s tariff policies have drawn historic investments and opened up global markets for U.S. businesses. Congratulations America: 3 percent today, and we’re just getting started.”

    Secretary of Labor Lori Chavez-DeRemer: “Thanks to @POTUS, working families are thriving and our economy is booming”

    National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett: “There’s really strong growth, really strong income growth, we’ve got a huge reduction in government spending … Every single thing about this GDP release has shown strength.”

    Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt: “Today, GDP growth came in above market expectations, and yesterday, consumer confidence rose. Americans trust in President Trump’s America First economic agenda that continues to prove the so-called ‘experts’ wrong. President Trump has reduced America’s reliance on foreign products, boosted investment in the US, and created thousands of jobs — delivering on his promise to Make America Wealthy Again. The data is clear and there are no more excuses, now is the time for ‘too late’ Powell to cut the rates!”

    Counselor to the Secretary of the Treasury Joseph Lavorgna: “Q2 real #GDP expands 3.0%, above consensus expectations! Passage of the #OBBB and the CapEx comeback which is already underway will power a second half boom and beyond.”

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA News: Suspending Duty-Free De Minimis Treatment for All Countries

    Source: US Whitehouse

    class=”has-text-align-left”>By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) (IEEPA), the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.), section 604 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2483), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code, it is hereby ordered:

    Section 1.  Background.  In Executive Order 14193 of February 1, 2025 (Imposing Duties To Address the Flow of Illicit Drugs Across Our Northern Border), I declared a national emergency regarding the unusual and extraordinary threat to the safety and security of Americans, including the public health crisis caused by fentanyl and other illicit drugs and the failure of Canada to do more to arrest, seize, detain, or otherwise intercept drug trafficking organizations, other drug and human traffickers, criminals at large, and illicit drugs.  In that order, I determined that it was necessary and appropriate to, among other things, suspend duty-free de minimis treatment under 19 U.S.C. 1321(a)(2)(C) for articles described in section 2(a) and section 2(b) of that order.  In Executive Order 14226 of March 2, 2025 (Amendment to Duties To Address the Flow of Illicit Drugs Across Our Northern Border), I paused the suspension of duty-free de minimis treatment on such articles until I received a notification from the Secretary of Commerce (Secretary) that adequate systems are in place to fully and expeditiously process and collect duties for such articles that would otherwise be eligible for duty-free de minimis treatment.

    In Executive Order 14194 of February 1, 2025 (Imposing Duties To Address the Situation at Our Southern Border), I declared a national emergency regarding the unusual and extraordinary threat to the safety and security of Americans, including the public health crisis caused by fentanyl and other illicit drugs and the failure of Mexico to do more to arrest, seize, detain, or otherwise intercept drug trafficking organizations, other drug and human traffickers, criminals at large, and illicit drugs.  In that order, I determined that it was necessary and appropriate to, among other things, suspend duty-free de minimis treatment under 19 U.S.C. 1321(a)(2)(C) for articles described in section 2(a) of that order.  In Executive Order 14227 of March 2, 2025 (Amendment to Duties To Address the Situation at Our Southern Border), I paused the suspension of duty-free de minimis treatment on such articles until I received a notification from the Secretary that adequate systems are in place to fully and expeditiously process and collect duties for such articles that would otherwise be eligible for duty-free de minimis treatment.

    In Executive Order 14195 of February 1, 2025 (Imposing Duties To Address the Synthetic Opioid Supply Chain in the People’s Republic of China), I declared a national emergency regarding the unusual and extraordinary threat from the failure of the Government of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to arrest, seize, detain, or otherwise intercept chemical precursor suppliers, money launderers, other transnational criminal organizations, criminals at large, and illicit drugs.  In that order, I determined that it was necessary and appropriate to, among other things, suspend duty-free de minimis treatment under 19 U.S.C. 1321(a)(2)(C) for articles described in section 2(a) of that order.  In Executive Order 14200 of February 5, 2025 (Amendment to Duties Addressing the Synthetic Opioid Supply Chain in the People’s Republic of China), I paused the suspension of duty-free de minimis treatment for articles described in section 2(a) of Executive Order 14195 until I received a notification from the Secretary that adequate systems are in place to fully and expeditiously process and collect duties for such articles that would otherwise be eligible for duty-free de minimis treatment.

    I subsequently received notification from the Secretary that adequate systems have been established to process and collect duties for articles of the PRC and Hong Kong that would otherwise be eligible for duty-free de minimis treatment, and in Executive Order 14256 of April 2, 2025 (Further Amendment to Duties Addressing the Synthetic Opioid Supply Chain in the People’s Republic of China as Applied to Low-Value Imports), I suspended duty-free de minimis treatment under 19 U.S.C. 1321(a)(2)(C) for products of the PRC and Hong Kong described in section 2(a) of Executive Order 14195, as amended by Executive Order 14228 (Further Amendment to Duties Addressing the Synthetic Opioid Supply Chain in the People’s Republic of China).  In addition, I instructed the Secretary to submit a report regarding the impact of Executive Order 14256 on American industries, consumers, and supply chains and to make recommendations for further action as he deems necessary.

    In Executive Order 14257 of April 2, 2025 (Regulating Imports With a Reciprocal Tariff To Rectify Trade Practices That Contribute to Large and Persistent Annual United States Goods Trade Deficits), I declared a national emergency with respect to underlying conditions indicated by the large and persistent annual U.S. goods trade deficits.  I also provided that duty-free de minimis treatment under 19 U.S.C. 1321(a)(2)(C) would remain available for products described in section 3(a) of that order until I received a notification by the Secretary that adequate systems are in place to fully and expeditiously process and collect duties applicable for articles otherwise eligible for duty-free de minimis treatment.

    The Secretary has notified me that adequate systems are now in place to fully and expeditiously process and collect duties for articles otherwise eligible for duty-free de minimis treatment on a global basis, including for products described in section 2(a) and section 2(b) of Executive Order 14193, section 2(a) of Executive Order 14194, and section 3(a) of Executive Order 14257.

    In my judgment, I determine that it is still necessary and appropriate to suspend duty-free de minimis treatment under 19 U.S.C. 1321(a)(2)(C) in the manner and for the articles described below to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threats, which have their source in whole or substantial part outside the United States, to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States. 

    I determine that it is necessary and appropriate to suspend duty-free de minimis treatment under 19 U.S.C. 1321(a)(2)(C) for certain Canadian goods to deal with the emergency declared in Executive Order 14193, as amended.  In my judgment, this suspension is necessary and appropriate to ensure that the tariffs imposed by Executive Order 14193, as amended, are effective in addressing the emergency declared in Executive Order 14193 and that the purpose of this action and other actions to address the emergency declared in Executive Order 14193 is not undermined.  For example, many shippers go to great lengths to evade law enforcement and hide illicit substances in imports that go through international commerce.  These shippers conceal the true contents of shipments sent to the United States through deceptive shipping practices.  Some of the techniques employed by these shippers to conceal the true contents of the shipments, the identity of the distributors, and the country of origin of the imports include the use of re-shippers in the United States, false invoices, fraudulent postage, and deceptive packaging.  The risks of evasion, deception, and illicit-drug importation are particularly high for low-value articles that have been eligible for duty-free de minimis treatment.

    Independently, I determine that it is necessary and appropriate to suspend duty-free de minimis treatment under 19 U.S.C. 1321(a)(2)(C) for certain Mexican goods to deal with the emergency declared in Executive Order 14194, as amended.  In my judgment, and for substantially similar reasons as above, this suspension is necessary and appropriate to ensure that the tariffs imposed by Executive Order 14194, as amended, are effective in addressing the emergency declared in Executive Order 14194 and that the purpose of this action and other actions to address the emergency declared in Executive Order 14194 is not undermined.

    Independently, and after considering information newly provided by the Secretary, among other things, I determine that it is still necessary and appropriate to continue to suspend duty-free de minimis treatment under 19 U.S.C. 1321(a)(2)(C) for certain goods of the PRC and Hong Kong to deal with the emergency declared in Executive Order 14195, as amended.  In my judgment, and for substantially similar reasons as above, this suspension is still necessary and appropriate to ensure that the tariffs imposed by Executive Order 14195, as amended, are effective in addressing the emergency declared in Executive Order 14195 and that the purpose of this action and other actions to address the emergency declared in Executive Order 14195 is not undermined.

    Also independently, I determine that it is necessary and appropriate to suspend duty-free de minimis treatment under 19 U.S.C. 1321(a)(2)(C) on a global basis to deal with the emergency declared in Executive Order 14257, as amended.  In my judgment, this suspension is necessary and appropriate to ensure that the tariffs imposed by Executive Order 14257, as amended, are not evaded and are effective in addressing the emergency declared in Executive Order 14257 and that the purpose of this action and other actions to address the emergency declared in Executive Order 14257 is not undermined.

    Each of my determinations to suspend or continue to suspend duty-free de minimis treatment under 19 U.S.C. 1321(a)(2)(C) are independent from the other.  And each determination is made only for the purpose to deal with the respective emergency and not for the purpose of dealing with another emergency.

    Sec. 2.  Suspension of Duty-Free de minimis Treatment.  (a)  The duty-free de minimis exemption provided under 19 U.S.C. 1321(a)(2)(C) shall no longer apply to any shipment of articles not covered by 50 U.S.C. 1702(b), regardless of value, country of origin, mode of transportation, or method of entry.  Accordingly, all such shipments, except those sent through the international postal network, shall be subject to all applicable duties, taxes, fees, exactions, and charges.  International postal shipments not covered by 50 U.S.C. 1702(b) shall be subject to the duty rates described in section 3 of this order.  Entry for all shipments that — prior to the effective date of this order — qualified for the de minimis exemption, except for shipments sent through the international postal network, shall be filed using an appropriate entry type in the Automated Commercial Environment (ACE) by a party qualified to make such entry.

    (b)  Shipments sent through the international postal network that would otherwise qualify for the de minimis exemption under 19 U.S.C. 1321(a)(2)(C) shall pass free of any duties except those specified in section 3 of this order, and without the preparation of an entry by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), until such time as CBP establishes a new entry process and publishes that process in the Federal Register.  

    Sec. 3.  Duty Rates for International Postal Shipments.  (a)  Transportation carriers delivering shipments to the United States through the international postal network, or other parties if qualified in lieu of such transportation carriers, must collect and remit duties to CBP using the methodology described in either subsection (b) or (c) of this section.  Each transportation carrier shall apply the same methodology across all covered shipments during any given period but may change its methodology no more than once per calendar month, or on another schedule determined to be appropriate by CBP, upon providing at least 24 hours’ notice to CBP.

    (b)  A duty equal to the effective IEEPA tariff rate applicable to the country of origin of the product shall be assessed on the value of each dutiable postal item (package) containing goods entered for consumption.

    (c)  A specific duty shall be assessed on each package containing goods entered for consumption, based on the effective IEEPA tariff rate applicable to the country of origin of the product as follows:

    (i)    Countries with an effective IEEPA tariff rate of less than 16 percent:  $80 per item;

    (ii)   Countries with an effective IEEPA tariff rate between 16 and 25 percent (inclusive):  $160 per item; and

    (iii)  Countries with an effective IEEPA rate above 25 percent:  $200 per item.

    (d)  For all international postal shipments subject to the methodologies described in subsections (b) and (c) of this section, the country of origin of the article must be declared to CBP.

    (e)  The specific duty methodology provided for in subsection (c) of this section shall be available for transportation carriers to select for a period of 6 months from the effective date of this order.  After such time all shipments to the United States through the international postal network must comply with the ad valorem duty methodology in subsection (b) of this section.

    (f)  Shipments sent through the international postal network that are subject to antidumping and countervailing duties or a quota must continue to be entered under an appropriate entry type in ACE to the extent required by all applicable regulations.

    Sec. 4.  Implementation.  (a)  The requirements and procedures established by sections 2 and 3 of this order shall be effective with respect to goods entered for consumption, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time on August 29, 2025.

    (b)  The provisions of this order supersede section 2 of Executive Order 14256, as amended, with respect to goods entered for consumption, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time on August 29, 2025.

    (c)  Consistent with applicable law, the Secretary of Homeland Security is directed and authorized to take all necessary actions to implement and effectuate this order — including through temporary suspension or amendment of regulations or through notices in the Federal Register and by adopting rules, regulations, or guidance — and to employ all powers granted to the President by IEEPA as may be necessary to implement and effectuate this order.  The Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the United States International Trade Commission (ITC), shall determine whether modifications to the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States are necessary to effectuate this order and may make such modifications through notice in the Federal Register.  The Secretary of Homeland Security shall consult with the Secretary of State, the Secretary of the Treasury, the Attorney General, the Secretary of Commerce, the United States Trade Representative, the ITC, and the Postmaster General, where appropriate.  The Secretary of Homeland Security may, consistent with applicable law, redelegate any of these functions within the Department of Homeland Security.  All executive departments and agencies shall take all appropriate measures within their authority to implement this order.

    (d)  To ensure remittance of duties in accordance with this order, and to assure compliance with other legal requirements, CBP is authorized to require a basic importation and entry bond as described in 19 C.F.R. 113.62 for informal entries valued at or less than $2,500.  Any carrier that transports international postal shipments to the United States, by any mode of transportation, must have an international carrier bond as described in 19 C.F.R. 113.64 to ensure payment of the duties described in section 3 of this order.  CBP is authorized to ensure that the international carrier bonds required by this subsection are sufficient to account for the duties described in section 3 of this order.

    Sec. 5Definition.  As used in this order, the term “effective IEEPA tariff rate” means the total duty rate imposed on articles to address a national emergency declared under IEEPA, including Executive Order 14257, as amended; Executive Order 14193; as amended, Executive Order 14194, as amended; and Executive Order 14195, as amended, in accordance with the stacking rules set out in Executive Order 14289 of April 29, 2025 (Addressing Certain Tariffs on Imported Articles), and any subsequent order or proclamation addressing stacking or the applicability of tariffs imposed under IEEPA.

    Sec. 6.  Severability.  (a)  If any provision of this order or the application of any provision of this order to any individual or circumstance is held to be invalid, the remainder of this order and the application of its provisions to any other individuals or circumstances shall not be affected.

    (b)(i)  If the additional duties imposed under Executive Order 14193, as amended, Executive Order 14194, as amended, Executive Order 14195, as amended, or Executive Order 14257, as amended, are held to be invalid, the suspension of, or continued suspension of, duty-free de minimis treatment, as detailed in this order, shall not be affected.  Duty-free de minimis treatment would still be suspended, whether pursuant to my authority under 50 U.S.C. 1702(a)(1)(B) to “regulate . . . importation” or my authority under that provision to “nullify” or “void” “exercising any right . . . or privilege with respect to . . . any property,” in the way and to the extent explained in this order, to deal with the emergencies declared in Executive Order 14193, as amended, Executive Order 14194, as amended, Executive Order 14195, as amended, or Executive Order 14257, as amended.  Such suspensions are still necessary and appropriate to address the unusual and extraordinary threats to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States.  Each determination to suspend or continue to suspend duty-free de minimis treatment is still independent from the other determination and made only with the purpose to deal with the respective emergency and not for the purpose of dealing with another emergency.  CBP is directed and authorized to take all necessary actions consistent with applicable law to implement and effectuate this order in line with this section ‑- including through temporary suspension or amendment of regulations or through notices in the Federal Register and by adopting rules, regulations, or guidance — and to employ all powers granted to the President by IEEPA as may be necessary to implement and effectuate this order in line with this section.

    (ii)  Duty-free de minimis treatment under 19 U.S.C. 1321(a)(2)(C) shall remain available for postal shipments until notification by the Secretary to the President that adequate systems are in place to fully and expeditiously process and collect duties applicable for postal shipments otherwise eligible for duty-free de minimis treatment.  After such notification, duty-free de minimis treatment under 19 U.S.C. 1321(a)(2)(C) shall not be available for postal shipments.

    Sec7.  General Provisions.  (a)  Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

    (i)   the authority granted by law to an executive

    department or agency, or the head thereof; or

    (ii)  the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

    (b)  This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

    (c)  This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

    (d)  The costs for publication of this order shall be borne by the Department of Homeland Security.

                                 DONALD J. TRUMP

    THE WHITE HOUSE,

        July 30, 2025.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: LEADER JEFFRIES STATEMENT ON HISTORIC LAWSUIT AGAINST THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Hakeem Jeffries (8th District of New York)

    Today, Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries released the following statement:

    Over the last several months, the Trump administration has repeatedly and unlawfully blocked Members of Congress from carrying out oversight of potential abuses in our immigration detention system. Today, Democratic Members of Congress are fighting back with a first-of-its-kind lawsuit asserting our constitutional responsibility to serve as a check-and-balance on the executive branch and its weaponization of immigration enforcement.

    Donald Trump’s Department of Homeland Security is undermining our values as a nation of immigrants and one anchored in the rule of law. ICE and DHS have repeatedly and illegally arrested and detained American citizens and lawful permanent residents without due process. These extreme tactics, like raiding churches and schools and unleashing masked ICE agents on law-abiding communities, are extreme and unacceptable. The Trump administration is determined to hide the truth from Congress and the American people. House Democrats will not be silenced or intimidated.

    This is an all-hands-on-deck effort, and I thank my colleagues for their leadership in bringing this groundbreaking lawsuit forward, including: the Congressional Hispanic Caucus led by Chair Adriano Espaillat, the Rapid Response Task Force and Litigation Working Group helmed by Assistant Democratic Leader Joe Neguse and Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Jamie Raskin, Homeland Security Committee Ranking Member Bennie Thompson, Oversight and Government Reform Committee Ranking Member Robert Garcia, a group of the Members putting themselves on the frontline of this fight including Representatives Lou Correa, Jason Crow, Veronica Escobar, Dan Goldman, Jimmy Gomez, Raul Ruiz and Norma Torres and our partners at Democracy Forward and American Oversight. 

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Casten, 92 House Democrats Demand Oversight Into Humanitarian Efforts in Gaza Amid Starvation Crisis

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Sean Casten (IL-06)

    July 30, 2025

    Washington, D.C. — U.S. Congressman Sean Casten (IL-06) led 92 House Democrats in a letter to Secretary of State Marco Rubio demanding an investigation into the ownership structure and operation of the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), a private, unqualified U.S.-linked aid organization at the center of the worsening starvation and humanitarian crisis in Gaza.

    A copy of the letter can be found here.

    GHF is a U.S.-linked aid organization with no prior experience in humanitarian aid and operates under opaque funding arrangements. GHF received a $30 million grant from the State Department, despite significant internal objections from USAID officials that the group’s funding plan failed to meet the “minimum technical or budgetary standards.” In their letter, the lawmakers criticize the organization’s lack of qualifications, noting that neither of the private firms contracted by GHF to manage distribution sites in Gaza has prior experience in humanitarian work, nor does GHF Executive Chairman Johnnie Moore, who is a close ally of President Donald Trump.

    “We have serious concerns with the operations of GHF, a newly established, private, U.S.-linked organization with no prior humanitarian experience, and the possibility that it could become the sole or primary aid provider in Gaza,” the lawmakers wrote. “…Providing secure and efficient humanitarian assistance to Palestinians is not only a moral obligation—it is also vital to Israel’s long-term security and the safe return of Israeli hostages. Enhancing aid operations is essential to stabilizing the region and achieving lasting peace.”

    In July 2025, the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification, a panel developed by the United Nations’ Food and Agriculture Organization, issued a report warning that “the worst-case scenario of Famine is currently playing out in the Gaza Strip.” Netanyahu’s blockade and GHF’s dangerously mismanaged aid sites are directly contributing to the starvation crisis.

    The lawmakers also expressed concern regarding disturbing violence at GHF distribution sites, where flawed distribution methods have caused mass panic and mass casualties.

    GHF operates only four aid distribution sites in Gaza using a reckless first-come, first-served model that has resulted in deadly chaos. At least 1,000 Palestinians have reportedly been killed while attempting to access aid near GHF sites, with reports describing Israeli soldiers and U.S. contractors opening fire on desperate civilians. One former contractor said he was instructed to “shoot to kill and ask questions later.”

    “Instead of using traditional aid distribution methods, based on internationally agreed-upon humanitarian principles, GHF provides food on a first-come, first-served basis,” the lawmakers continued. “As a result, when centers open, large crowds of Palestinians rush to the centers. In these situations, there appear to be few restrictions on the use of lethal force by Israeli soldiers and American contractors in the vicinity.”

    In addition to Rep. Casten, the letter was signed by Amo, Gabe; Ansari, Yassamin; Balint, Becca; Barragán, Nanette; Bera, Ami; Bonamici, Suzanne; Brownley, Julia; Brown, Shontel; Carbajal, Salud; Carson, André; Carter, Troy; Castro, Joaquin; Chu, Judy; Cleaver, Emanuel; Cohen, Steve; Courtney, Joe; Craig, Angie; Crow, Jason; Davis, Danny; Dean, Madeleine; DeGette, Diana; DeLauro, Rosa; Deluzio, Christopher; DeSaulnier, Mark; Dexter, Maxine; Dingell, Debbie; Doggett, Lloyd; Escobar, Veronica; Fields, Cleo; Foster, Bill; Foushee, Valerie; Frost, Maxwell; Garcia, Robert; Garcia, Sylvia; Green, Al; Harder, Josh; Hayes, Jahana; Houlahan, Chrissy; Hoyle, Val; Huffman, Jared; Jackson, Jonathan; Jacobs, Sara; Johnson, Henry; Kaptur, Marcy; Keating, William; Kelly, Robin; Khanna, Ro; Larsen, Rick; Larson, John; Leger Fernandez, Teresa; Lofgren, Zoe; Lynch, Stephen; Magaziner, Seth; Matsui, Doris; McBride, Sarah; McClellan, Jennifer; McCollum, Betty; McGovern, James; Moore, Gwen; Mullin, Kevin; Nadler, Jerrold; Norton, Eleanor; Ocasio-Cortez, Alexandria; Panetta, Jimmy; Pappas, Chris; Pelosi, Nancy; Pettersen, Brittany; Pingree, Chellie; Pocan, Mark; Pressley, Ayanna; Quigley, Mike; Randall, Emily; Ruiz, Raul; Salinas, Andrea; Schakowsky, Janice; Schrier, Kim; Scott, Robert; Smith, Adam; Sorensen, Eric; Stansbury, Melanie; Swalwell, Eric; Takano, Mark; Thompson, Bennie; Thompson, Mike; Tokuda, Jill; Tonko, Paul; Trahan, Lori; Underwood, Lauren; Vasquez, Gabe; Velázquez, Nydia; Watson Coleman, Bonnie; and Williams, Nikema.

    A copy of the letter can be found here. Text of the letter can be found below.

    Dear Secretary Rubio:

    As supporters of a strong U.S.-Israel relationship and advocates for humanitarian assistance to the people of Gaza, we write to seek clarity on the ownership structure and operation of the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF).

    More than two million people in Gaza currently face “critical levels” of hunger. We welcome efforts to facilitate the entry of humanitarian aid and share the objective of ensuring that Hamas does not divert such aid. However, we have serious concerns with the operations of GHF, a newly established, private, U.S.-linked organization with no prior humanitarian experience, and the possibility that it could become the sole or primary aid provider in Gaza. We agree that delivering aid promptly and securely is crucial. However, GHF’s practices and finances require increased transparency and oversight to ensure aid reaches the intended beneficiaries effectively, safely, and in accordance with international standards.

    On June 24, 2025, the Department of State (DOS) approved a $30 million grant for GHF. Jeremy Lewin, a current DOS official and former Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) employee, reportedly moved forward with the grant’s approval despite 58 internal objections that U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) staff experts wanted GHF to resolve before approving funding, and an assessment in a memorandum from an acting USAID official that GHF’s funding plan failed to meet required “minimum technical or budgetary standards.” As lawmakers entrusted with the authority to appropriate taxpayer funds, which were undoubtedly used for GHF’s grant, we find this troubling.

    Moreover, GHF has not published a complete list of its sponsors. Registered in Delaware in February 2025, GHF also established an office in Geneva, Switzerland (which the Swiss government has since announced is to be dissolved) with the explicit intent of accommodating donors that “prefer to participate outside of the U.S. structure.” The foundation has publicly stated that it has received at least $119 million from “other government donors.” Furthermore, despite its public denial, the Israeli government has reportedly covertly contributed approximately $280 million USD to the new aid mechanism run by GHF. Full disclosure of GHF’s funding sources is imperative.

    GHF runs four aid distribution sites in Gaza. It contracts two American private firms, Safe Reach Solutions (SRS) and UG Solutions (UGS), to provide security and logistics, with some pricing models reportedly provided by Boston Consulting Group consultants, who reportedly regularly met with Israeli officials in connection with the consultants’ role in helping develop ideas for GHF’s operations. None of the groups have prior humanitarian experience, nor does GHFExecutive Chairman Johnnie Moore, a close ally of President Trump. As a result, these distribution centers appear to operate at a reduced capacity at an exorbitant cost, significantly exceeding the current operating costs of experienced humanitarian organizations.

    We are further alarmed at the widespread violence at GHF distribution centers. As of July 23, 2025, there have reportedly been at least 1,000 people killed while trying to access critical aid near GHF sites. Instead of using traditional aid distribution methods, based on internationally agreed-upon humanitarian principles, GHF provides food on a first-come, first-served basis. As a result, when centers open, large crowds of Palestinians rush to the centers. In these situations, there appear to be few restrictions on the use of lethal force by Israeli soldiers and American contractors in the vicinity. A former security contractor stated that he was instructed, “if you feel threatened, shoot – shoot to kill and ask questions later.” GHF centers offer desperately needed lifelines to those who receive aid without experiencing violence. However, the risk of violence, long wait times, and limited aid availability appear to force hundreds of thousands to choose between risking their lives or going without food.

    The operations of the GHF sites are widely criticized by experienced humanitarian organizations as being inefficient and dangerous, and violating internationally agreed-upon humanitarian principles. Notably, GHF’s inaugural Executive Director and former Marine, Jake Wood, resigned from the organization, citing that the organization no longer aligned with “humanitarian principles.”

    Providing secure and efficient humanitarian assistance to Palestinians is not only a moral obligation—it is also vital to Israel’s long-term security and the safe return of Israeli hostages. Enhancing aid operations is essential to stabilizing the region and achieving lasting peace. To address our concerns, we respectfully request responses to the following questions no later than August 14th, 2025:

    1. From which congressionally appropriated account does DOS’s $30 million grant for the GHF originate?

    2. What specific oversight mechanisms are in place to ensure that the GHF operates in accordance with U.S. and international humanitarian law and humanitarian principles of neutrality and impartiality?

    3. The DOS reportedly stated that GHF is subject to “rigorous oversight, including of GHF’s operations and finances.”

      1. What is DOS’s role in monitoring the daily operations and financial practices of GHF, and what is the reporting mechanism?

      2. Are the GHF and the private security contractors that it partners with to distribute assistance in compliance with U.S. standards (legal, regulatory, technical, budgetary, or otherwise) for humanitarian organizations?

    4. The $30 million grant to GHF was approved despite 58 internal objections that USAID staff experts wanted GHF to resolve before approving funding, and an assessment in a memorandum from an acting USAID official that GHF’s funding plan failed to meet required ‘minimum technical or budgetary standards.’ What were the details of their objections or concerns, and why were they overridden?

    5. What makes GHF more qualified than other humanitarian organizations with years of experience and the operational expertise needed to handle such a complex situation?

      1. What makes the newly appointed Executive Chairman, Rev. Johnnie Moore Jr., a man with no prior humanitarian experience, but a close relationship with President Trump, the right person to lead GHF?

    6. What steps is the U.S. government taking to address concerns about militarization at GHF’s aid sites, particularly regarding the involvement of U.S. private contractors and Israeli security forces?

    7. Is there a formal agreement or memo of understanding between the U.S. and GHF that outlines the foundation’s operational guidelines, transparency, and accountability measures? If so, please provide a copy or summary of these terms.

    8. Was the DOS involved in the decision-making processes that led to the establishment of only four aid distribution centers in Gaza to date? If so, please provide details of that communication.

    9. GHF refuses to publish its sources of funding, including the $119 million it received from “other government donors.” What is the complete and most current list of GHF’s donors?

    10. What are the details of the contracts between GHF, its contractors, Safe Reach Solutions (SRS), UGSolutions (UGS), and its aid providers?

      1. What does GHF pay per diem for security and logistics to SRS and UGS?

      2. Where does GHF source its aid packages from? How much does it pay for them?

    11. Has the U.S. conducted any oversight or reviews of GHF’s operations in light of recent criticisms related to overcrowding, militarization, and security concerns? If so, what were the findings?

    12. The Trump Administration is reportedly considering an additional $500 million grant to GHF using USAID funds. According to U.S. law, all NGO recipients of USAID grants are subject to a responsibility determination that certifies the NGO’s “necessary management competence…and that the applicant will practice mutually agreed upon methods of accountability for funds and other assets provided by USAID.”

      1. Will this funding be approved?

      2.  If so, what account will this funding come from?

    13. What steps will be taken to conduct the required “responsibility determination” certifying GHF’s competence and accountability?

    14. What specific benefits has GHF’s aid distribution model or operations provided for U.S. and Israeli interests that the U.S. government assesses may justify some of the apparent drawbacks of the GHF model and operations?

    15. Looking ahead, what information can the Administration share about the likely roles and potential roles of GHF and other humanitarian assistance providers in Gaza, respectively, under various scenarios (ceasefire, intensified conflict, post-conflict transition)? 

      1. What are the sources of this information?

      2. What factors will the Administration use to determine whether and how to provide U.S. support to GHF and/or other providers, while actively monitoring their compliance with applicable legal and other standards?

    16. How, if at all, will GHF coordinate with other humanitarian organizations already working in Gaza? Will GHF work within the already established coordinating mechanisms, and if so, how does it plan to do so?

    Thank you for your attention to this critical matter.

    Sincerely,

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Rep. Mike Levin Honors Michael Meyers as July 2025 Constituent of the Month

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Mike Levin (CA-49)

    July 30, 2025

    Michael Meyers

    Carlsbad, Calif. – Today, Rep. Mike Levin (CA-49) recognized Michael Meyers, a Carlsbad native and founder of North County San Diego’s first local goalball team for the blind and visually impaired, as his July 2025 Constituent of the Month. 

    Michael was diagnosed with retinitis pigmentosa, a degenerative eye disease, during high school and turned his disability into a force for local advocacy. While attending a rehabilitation program in Colorado, he discovered goalball, a team sport designed specifically for visually impaired athletes. After returning home to Carlsbad, he learned there were no local teams or programs that offered the sport. Michael worked with family and friends to launch a North County San Diego Goalball team earlier this year to provide this unique sporting opportunity to members of the community.  

    In just a few months, the team has grown to include more than 30 players and has drawn support from national leaders in adaptive sports, including Paralympic silver medalist Joseph Hamilton and former U.S. Men’s National Goalball Team head coach Matt Boyle.  

    Rep. Levin recognized Michael for his inspiring leadership and commitment to accessibility, health, and community inclusion.  

    See below for Rep. Levin’s statement recognizing Michael Meyers in the Congressional Record: 

    “Mr. Speaker, I am proud to recognize Michael Meyers as my July 2025 Constituent of the Month.  

    “Michael represents the best in our community. He is resilient, innovative, and committed to making our district more inclusive for individuals with disabilities. Michael saw a lack of recreational opportunities for people with visual impairments in our region and took it upon himself to create a solution. The goalball team he founded in North County San Diego is now helping dozens of visually impaired residents stay active, build confidence, and connect with one another.  

    “Michael’s work ensures that people who are blind or visually impaired have the chance to be part of a team, to challenge themselves, and to not sit on the sidelines. That spirit of inclusion and determination is exactly what makes our district special, and it is why I am honored to recognize Michael as my Constituent of the Month.” 

    ABOUT THE CONSTITUENT OF THE MONTH PROGRAM:  

    Rep. Levin’s Constituent of the Month program recognizes outstanding North County San Diego and South Orange County residents who have gone above and beyond to help their neighbors, give back to their community, and represent the best of our country. Rep Levin’s?June 2025 Constituent of the Month was Nani Love, a case manager and victim’s advocate at the North County LGBTQ Resource Center, and his May 2025 Constituent of the Month was Rohen Vargo, the founder of a student-run blood pressure screening clinic.  

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Rep. Mike Levin, Health Leaders & Patients Expose Devastating Medicaid Cuts That Threaten Access to Health Care

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Mike Levin (CA-49)

    July 29, 2025

    Rep. Levin, health leaders & patients discuss impacts of devastating Medicaid cuts

    View full press conference here

    Vista, CA — On the eve of the 60th anniversary of Medicaid becoming law, Rep. Mike Levin (CA-49), health leaders, and patients condemned deep Medicaid and health care cuts enacted under the Republican budget law that threaten access to health care services for millions of Americans. The Republican budget will harm seniors, low-income families, and California’s health care system.

    President Trump signed into law the Republican budget, also called the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, on July 4th. The law makes the largest cuts to Medicaid in the program’s history and puts hospitals, emergency care, and Medicaid coverage at risk for nearly 15 million people, including two million people in California. The state expects billions in projected revenue losses?for health care providers, which is expected to reduce access to care. 

    “Medicaid has given millions of Americans access to care for six decades, but today, that promise is being broken,” said Rep. Levin. “This reckless law is a disaster for public health that will force millions of people off their insurance, raise premiums, and shut down hospitals and clinics. These cuts aren’t just numbers on a page, they’re real people who will lose access to life saving care and we can’t allow that to happen.” 

    The Republican budget law will:

    • Cut $1 trillion to Medicaid; 
    • Kick 15 million Americans off their health care coverage; 
    • Defund Planned Parenthood and impact over 1 million women;  
    • Increase premiums and copays for families nationwide; 
    • Impose paperwork requirements that could lock people out of coverage;  
    • Cut billions from hospital and clinics.  

    “This law rips health care away from families so billionaires can get tax breaks. We won’t stand for it, and I will continue fighting to protect Medicaid to ensure every American gets the care they deserve,” said Rep. Levin.

    Local health professionals on the ground described how the law puts critical services and patients at serious risk.   

    “At Gary and Mary West PACE, over 90% of the older adults we serve rely on Medicaid to access critical services that keep them health and independent in their homes,” said West PACE Community Engagement Director, Mary Jurgensen. “Across California, PACE programs serve nearly 22,000 seniors annually, each one counting on coordinated care, meals, therapy, and transportation that Medicaid funds support. The proposed Medicaid cuts in HR 1 threaten our ability to deliver these essential services and will place people at risk of losing access to life-sustaining care.” 

    Health leaders noted that in California, premiums are expected to soar. For those insured under Covered California, insurers are already seeking rate increases over 20%. Data from the House Budget Committee shows that more than 2 million people across California could lose health insurance, including children and seniors.

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Secretary Hoskins Applauds the Professionalism of the Missouri Secretary of State’s Legal & Elections Teams Following Indictment of St. Louis County E

    Source: US State of Missouri

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

    July 30, 2025

    Secretary Hoskins Applauds the Professionalism of the Missouri Secretary of State’s Legal & Elections Teams Following Indictment of St. Louis County Executive Sam Page

    JEFFERSON CITY, MO—Missouri Secretary of State Denny Hoskins today commended the outstanding work of the Legal and Elections divisions at the Missouri Secretary of State’s Office, whose investigation into possible misuse of public funds culminated in referral to the Missouri Attorney General’s Office.

    A St. Louis County grand jury has indicted County Executive Sam Page on two misdemeanor election charges and two felony theft charges. The indictment alleges that taxpayer dollars were used to fund a mailer opposing Proposition B in the April 8, 2025, ballot—a clear violation of state law prohibiting public officials from using government funds to influence ballot measures.

    “Our office takes its role in protecting fair and lawful elections extremely seriously,” said Secretary of State Hoskins. “I’m proud of the seasoned professionals in our Legal and Elections divisions whose experience, integrity, and diligence ensured this matter was thoroughly and professionally examined.”

    The Secretary of State’s Office referred the investigation initially to the St. Louis County Prosecuting Attorney’s Office. Due to a conflict of interest, the case was reassigned and is now being handled by a special prosecutor within the Missouri Attorney General’s Office.

    “This process reflects the strength of checks and balances within Missouri’s government,” added Hoskins. “Thanks to the expertise of our teams, Missouri citizens can expect real accountability for the appropriate use of public funds—not political campaigning.”

    Secretary Hoskins reaffirmed that the Secretary of State’s Office remains committed to upholding the integrity of elections and public trust.

    For more information, please contact Rachael Dunn, Director of Communications, via email at [email protected].

     

    About the Missouri Secretary of State’s Office

    The Missouri Secretary of State’s Office serves as a central hub for key state functions that promote transparency, security, and opportunity for all Missourians. The Office oversees the administration of fair and secure elections, registers and supports businesses, maintains and preserves state records through the State Archives, and ensures public access to government rulemaking via the Administrative Rules Division.

    Additionally, the Office protects investors through the Securities Division, supports libraries and literacy programs across the state, and administers the Safe at Home address confidentiality program for survivors of abuse and assault. With a commitment to service, accountability, and civic engagement, the Secretary of State’s Office works every day to strengthen Missouri’s government and communities.

     

    About Secretary of State Denny Hoskins

    Denny Hoskins, CPA, was elected Missouri’s 41st Secretary of State in November 2024. With a strong background in business and public service, he is committed to improving government efficiency, transparency, and supporting Missouri families. Hoskins previously served as a legislator in both the state Senate and House. He and his wife, Michelle, reside in Warrensburg and have five adult children.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Secretary Hoskins Highlights Ongoing Election Integrity Efforts

    Source: US State of Missouri

     

     

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

    July 30, 2025

    Secretary Hoskins Highlights Ongoing Election Integrity Efforts

    JEFFERSON CITY, MO — Secretary of State Denny Hoskins today announced the latest developments in Missouri’s ongoing commitment to ensuring accurate, secure, and transparent voter rolls, reinforcing the state’s position as a national leader in election integrity.

    “Free and fair elections begin with clean voter rolls,” said Secretary Hoskins. “That’s why Missouri conducts regular, extensive voter registration list maintenance—and we’re strengthening those efforts with powerful new tools and partnerships. I thank President Trump and his administration for taking leadership on allowing real, common sense resources for local election authorities to make strides in election integrity.”

    In 2025 alone, as of the release, Missouri’s local election authorities removed more than 195,000 outdated or ineligible voter registrations. These removals include over 4,000 individuals with felony convictions and over 43,000 confirmed deceased registrations. Please note, list maintenance is ongoing.

    Thanks to new access to federal databases—including the Department of Homeland Security’s Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) program and Social Security Administration records—Missouri is now better equipped than ever to identify noncitizens and deceased individuals on the voter rolls.

    Additionally, the Secretary of State’s Office is partnering with the Department of Homeland Security and the Federal Bureau of Investigations to investigate any non-citizens who have voted in Missouri. 

    The Secretary of State’s Office is also exploring memoranda of understanding (MOUs) with bordering and economically connected states to share data and enhance the accuracy of voter lists across state lines. These partnerships aim to provide additional safeguards against double registrations and unlawful voting.

    “These are not just numbers—they represent real accountability,” Hoskins said. “Behind each removal is a commitment to voter confidence, election integrity, and the rule of law. And none of it would be possible without the dedicated work of our local election authorities. Their efforts are essential to protecting our elections, and we thank them for their continued service to the people of Missouri.”

     

    About the Missouri Secretary of State’s Office

    The Missouri Secretary of State’s Office serves as a central hub for key state functions that promote transparency, security, and opportunity for all Missourians. The Office oversees the administration of fair and secure elections, registers and supports businesses, maintains and preserves state records through the State Archives, and ensures public access to government rulemaking via the Administrative Rules Division.

    Additionally, the Office protects investors through the Securities Division, supports libraries and literacy programs across the state, and administers the Safe at Home address confidentiality program for survivors of abuse and assault. With a commitment to service, accountability, and civic engagement, the Secretary of State’s Office works every day to strengthen Missouri’s government and communities.

     

    About Secretary of State Denny Hoskins

    Denny Hoskins, CPA, was elected Missouri’s 41st Secretary of State in November 2024. With a strong background in business and public service, he is committed to improving government efficiency, transparency, and supporting Missouri families. Hoskins previously served as a legislator in both the state Senate and House. He and his wife, Michelle, reside in Warrensburg and have five adult children.

     

    For more information, please contact Rachael Dunn, Director of Communications, via email at [email protected].

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Prepare for Heavy Rain and Potential Flooding

    Source: US State of New York

    overnor Kathy Hochul today directed State agencies to prepare for heavy rain and the potential for localized flooding as parts of the state are forecast to be impacted by periods of heavy rain Thursday into Friday. New Yorkers across the Mid-Hudson, Long Island and New York City Regions could see locally higher totals over 3 inches of rain beginning Thursday and are cautioned to be vigilant in impacted areas. The storm also has the potential to impact the Capital Region if the storm track shifts. This is expected to be a slow-moving weather event with the most severe impacts occurring where the storm ultimately sets up. Isolated strong thunderstorms bringing locally heavy downpours, isolated damaging winds and large hail may occur Wednesday evening in parts of the Capital Region, Mohawk Valley, Southern Tier, Mid-Hudson, New York City and Long Island. Following the rain, cooler temperatures and low levels of humidity will blanket the State over the weekend.

    “As the forecast shifts from extreme heat to heavy rains, I am urging all New Yorkers to stay vigilant and use caution through the end of this week,” Governor Hochul said. “State agencies are on standby for heavy downpours and localized flooding and will be monitoring the situation in real-time to ensure the safety of all New Yorkers in the path of the storm.”

    Residents are encouraged to monitor their local forecasts, weather watches and warnings. For a complete listing of weather alerts, visit the National Weather Service website at alerts.weather.gov.

    New Yorkers should ensure that government emergency alerts are enabled on their mobile phones. They should also sign up for real-time weather and emergency alerts that will be texted to their phones by texting their county or borough name to 333111.

    Agency Preparations

    Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Services
    The Division’s Office of Emergency Management (OEM) is in contact with their local counterparts and is prepared to facilitate requests for assistance. OEM has enhanced their monitoring, the Office of Fire Prevention and Control is preparing to stage water rescue teams in Orange County and Ulster Counties in advance of the anticipated weather and will activate the State Fire Operations Center if conditions warrant.

    State stockpiles are ready to deploy emergency response assets and supplies as needed. The State Watch Center is monitoring the storm track and statewide impacts closely.

    Department of Transportation
    The State Department of Transportation is monitoring weather conditions and prepared to respond with 3,428 supervisors and operators available statewide. All field staff are available to fully engage and respond.

    Statewide equipment numbers are as follows:

    • 1,431 large dump trucks
    • 337 large loaders
    • 92 chippers
    • 86 tracked and wheeled excavators
    • 33 water pumps
    • 32 traffic and tree crew bucket trucks
    • 28 traffic tower platforms
    • 16 vacuum trucks with sewer jets

    The need for additional resources will be re-evaluated as conditions warrant throughout the event. For real-time travel information, motorists should call 511 or visit 511ny.org, New York State’s official traffic and travel information source.

    Thruway Authority
    The Thruway Authority has 669 operators and supervisors prepared to respond to any wind or flood related issues across the state with small to medium sized excavators, plow/dump trucks, large loaders, portable Variable Message Signs (VMS) boards, portable light towers, smaller generators, smaller pumps and equipment hauling trailers, as well as signage and other traffic control devices available for any detours or closures. VMS and social media are utilized to alert motorists of weather conditions on the Thruway.

    Statewide equipment numbers are as follows:

    • 337 Large and Small Dump Trucks
    • 63 Loaders
    • 31 Trailers
    • 5 Vac Trucks
    • 14 Excavators
    • 8 Brush Chippers
    • 99 Chainsaws
    • 24 Aerial Trucks
    • 22 Skid Steers
    • 86 Portable Generators
    • 65 Portable Light Units

    The Thruway Authority encourages motorists to download its mobile app which is available to download for free on iPhone and Android devices. The app provides motorists direct access to live traffic cameras, real-time traffic information and navigation assistance while on the go. Motorists can also sign up for TRANSalert e-mails which provide the latest traffic conditions along the Thruway, follow @ThruwayTraffic on X, and visit thruway.ny.gov to see an interactive map showing traffic conditions for the Thruway and other New York State roadways.

    Department of Public Service
    New York’s utilities have approximately 5,500 workers available statewide to engage in damage assessment, response, repair and restoration efforts across New York State, as necessary. The utilities will work with the local, county, and state transportation agencies to navigate closed roadways in any areas experiencing flooding. Agency staff will track utilities’ work throughout the event and ensure utilities shift appropriate staffing to regions that experience the greatest impact.

    New York State Police
    State Police instructed all Troopers to remain vigilant and will deploy extra patrols to affected areas as needed. All four-wheel drive vehicles are in service, and all watercraft and specialty vehicles are staged and ready for deployment.

    Department of Environmental Conservation
    The Department of Environmental Conservation’s (DEC) Emergency Management staff, Environmental Conservation Police Officers, Forest Rangers, and regional staff remain on alert and continue to monitor weather forecasts. Working with partner agencies, DEC is prepared to coordinate resource deployment of all available assets, including first responders, to targeted areas in preparation for potential impacts due to heavy rainfall and flooding.

    DEC will have swift water teams staged in the Hudson Valley starting tomorrow morning through Friday, August 1.

    DEC reminds local officials to watch for potential flooding in their communities. Municipalities are encouraged to undertake local assessments of flood-prone areas and to remove any accumulating debris. DEC permits and authorization are not required to remove debris unless stream banks or beds will be disturbed by debris removal and/or the use of heavy equipment. Municipalities and local governments are advised to contact DEC’s Regional Permit Administrators if assistance is required and to help determine if a permit is necessary.

    If a permit is necessary, DEC can issue Emergency Authorizations to expedite approval of projects in place of an individual permit. DEC approves Emergency Authorizations for situations that are deemed an emergency based on the immediate protection of life, health, general welfare, property, or natural resources.

    Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation
    New York State Park Police and park personnel are on alert and closely monitoring weather conditions and impacts. Park visitors should visit parks.ny.gov, check the free mobile app, or call their local park office for the latest updates regarding park hours, openings and closings.

    Metropolitan Transportation Authority

    The Metropolitan Transportation Authority is closely monitoring weather conditions to ensure safe, reliable service. MTA employees will be poised to respond to any weather-related issues. To reduce the likelihood of flooding and respond to any instances of flooding, MTA crews will inspect drains in flood-prone areas to ensure they are functional, and supervisors will monitor flood-prone locations for any reports of flooding to ensure quick response. Elevator and escalator specialists will be deployed to flood-prone locations to attend to any weather-related elevator and escalator troubles.

    Customers are encouraged to check mta.info for the latest service updates, and to use caution while navigating the system. Customers should also sign up for real-time service alerts via text or email. These alerts are also available via the MTA app and the TrainTime app.

    Port Authority of New York and New Jersey

    The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey is closely monitoring weather forecasts and is working with airport terminal operators and other airport partners in preparation. Air travelers should check with their airlines for updated information on their flights or check the Federal Aviation Administration website for any FAA programs that may affect flight operations at their departure airport before leaving for the airport and allow for additional travel time. Motorists who use the Port Authority’s six bridges and tunnels are strongly encouraged to sign up for email alerts, bus riders can use the MyTerminal app for real-time alerts on bus service at the Midtown Bus Terminal, or for PATH riders, check train service information via the PATH mobile app, RidePATH.

    Flood Safety

    • Know your area’s type of flood risk — visit FEMA’s Flood Map Service Center.
    • Have a flood emergency plan in place that includes considerations for your children, pets and neighbors.
    • If you live in a flood-prone area, document your belongings and valuables. Keep important documents in a waterproof container. Create digital, password-protected copies of important documents, pictures, and other items.
    • Obtain flood insurance coverage under the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Homeowner’s policies do not cover flooding.
    • Monitor your local weather forecast and follow any warnings that may be broadcast.
    • If you are advised by emergency officials to take immediate action such as evacuation, do not wait – follow all orders promptly.
    • Traveling during a flood can be extremely dangerous. One foot of moving water can sweep a vehicle away. Never walk, swim or drive through flood waters. If you have doubts, remember: “Turn Around, Don’t Drown!”
    • Consider those with access and functional needs to determine if they are prepared for a flood emergency where they live and work.

    For more preparedness information and safety tips from DHSES, visit dhses.ny.gov/safety. The National Weather Service website also includes Flood Safety Tips and Spring Safety Resources.

    MIL OSI USA News