Source: US Senator for New Mexico Ben Ray Luján
Luján Joined Press Conference Ahead of Senate Republicans’ Vote, Highlighted Impact on New Mexico Students
Washington, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senator Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.), Ranking Member of the Telecommunications and Media Subcommittee, issued the following statement on Senate Republicans’ vote to strip internet access from millions of students and educators:
“Across the country, the E-Rate program has helped connect countless students to the internet they need to succeed in today’s world – especially in the most rural parts of America. Under the FCC’s Wi-Fi hotspots rule, schools and libraries across America can provide Wi-Fi hotspots to students and educators to use at home.
“Senate Republicans just passed a partisan resolution that would rob New Mexico students and educators of the very tools they need to succeed. When we should be increasing connectivity, my Republican colleagues are working to limit it. If this resolution is signed into law, New Mexico schools and libraries that have applied for Wi-Fi spots through the E-Rate program will be rejected.”
Earlier today, Senator Luján joined U.S. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), U.S. Senator Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.), and advocates at a press conference on Republican attempts to gut low-income, rural, and Tribal students’ access to Wi-Fi internet hotspots. Following the press conference, Senate Republicans voted to pass a Congressional Review Act resolution that overturns a Federal Communications Commission (FCC) rule allowing schools and libraries to use their E-Rate funds to loan Wi-Fi hotspots to students and educators.
In New Mexico, 40% of students lack access to high-speed broadband. Nationwide, studies have estimated between 9 million to 15 million U.S. students lack adequate internet access at home. Since 2020, the FCC’s E-Rate program has committed over $174 million in support to New Mexico schools and libraries.
Schools and libraries in New Mexico that have applied for Wi-Fi hotspots through the E-Rate program include:
· David F. Cargo El Valle De Anton Chico Library
· Farmington Municipal School District 5
· Grants Public Library
· Lake Valley Navajo School
· Ojo Encino Day School
· Taos Day School
· Taos Municipal School District
As Ranking Member of the Commerce Subcommittee on Telecommunications and Media, Senator Luján is a strong champion for 100% broadband connectivity. In the 118th Congress, Senator Luján introduced the bipartisan Tribal Connect Act to make it easier for Tribes to secure high-speed internet access at Tribal Essential Community-Serving Institutions through the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) Universal Service Fund (USF) Schools and Libraries Program, or E-Rate program. In the 117th Congress, Senator Luján introduced legislation to help close the homework gap by equipping school buses with Wi-Fi technology and improving financing options for broadband deployment.
Source: United States Senator for Utah Mike Lee
WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Mike Lee (R-UT) introduced the Interstate Obscenity Definition Act today to clarify the legal definition of “obscenity” for all states, making the transmission of obscene content across state lines more easily prosecuted. U.S. Representative Mary Miller (R-IL) is the bill’s co-lead in the House of Representatives.
“Obscenity isn’t protected by the First Amendment, but hazy and unenforceable legal definitions have allowed extreme pornography to saturate American society and reach countless children,” said Senator Mike Lee. “Our bill updates the legal definition of obscenity for the internet age so this content can be taken down and its peddlers prosecuted.”
“The Interstate Obscenity Definition Act equips law enforcement with the tools they need to target and remove obscene material from the internet, which is alarmingly destructive and far outside the bounds of protected free speech under the Constitution. I’m proud to lead this effort in the House with Senator Lee to safeguard American families and ensure this dangerous material is kept out of our homes and off our screens.” – Representative Mary Miller
The Interstate Obscenity Definition Act (IODA) clarifies the definition of obscenity across all states and provides updated descriptions suited to modern content. The new definition removes dependence on ever-changing and elusive public opinion, replacing ambiguity with practical standards to make obscenity identifiable. This change will prevent obscene material such as pornography from evading prosecution by relying on the legal confusion of differing standards between states. Under IODA, law enforcement will be empowered to identify and prevent obscenity from being transmitted across state lines.
Obscenity is already unprotected speech under the First Amendment, but its current definition makes it difficult to assess and prosecute. The current legal definition of obscenity was taken from a Supreme Court case argued in 1973. Its standards are subjective and vague, making it difficult to apply with certainty to any given material. Using a pre-internet standard for modern times presents serious challenges – particularly when states use differing definitions for “obscenity” – and allows criminals to evade prosecution.
The Interstate Obscenity Definition Act (IODA):
Defines “obscenity” within the Communications Act of 1934 as content that:
taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest in nudity, sex, or excretion,
depicts, describes or represents actual or simulated sexual acts with the objective intent to arouse, titillate, or gratify the sexual desires of a person, and,
taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.
Strengthens the existing general prohibition on obscenity in the Communications Act (47 U.S.C 223(a)) by removing the “intent” requirement that only prohibits the transmission of obscenity for the purposes abusing, threatening, or harassing a person.
Click here to read exclusive coverage from The Daily Caller.
IAM Local 700 and 1746 (District 26) members at Pratt & Whitney in Middletown and East Hartford, Conn., are on strike to secure a better contract.
Workers are seeking improved wage security, job security, and retirement security. But, the current company proposal do not address their core issues, despite the company’s high profits.
“I stand behind you and we’re going to fight like hell every day to get what you want,” said IAM Eastern Territory General Vice President David Sullivan.
Watch the video report here. View photo gallery here.
Union representatives and striking members emphasized the support of IAM and highlighted that the strike is driven by a significant rejection of the company’s offer and a strong desire to protect the future for all generations of workers. The difficulties faced by striking workers, such as the cost of childcare, are also mentioned by several members who are walking the picket lines.
IAM members at Pratt and Whitney have also received an outpouring of support from the highest levels of state government and leadership in the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives. Additionally, the striking members at Pratt and Whitney have drawn community support from other labor organizations.
Pratt and Whitney is a leader in manufacturing engines because of their workers, who are critical to the success of our nation’s manufacturing future. I strongly encourage their leadership and the machinists union to come together to reach a fair deal negotiated in good faith.
— Governor Ned Lamont (@GovNedLamont) May 5, 2025
Proud to stand with members of the machinist union to support their work to achieve a fair & reasonable contract. CT is home to the best trained & most highly qualified in the aerospace workforce. pic.twitter.com/s4Ck17A3d5
— Lt. Gov. Susan Bysiewicz (@LGSusanB) May 6, 2025
[embedded content]
To the hardworking members of IAM Local 700 and Local 1746 fighting for better wages, job security, and pensions: we stand with you.
These workers deserve a fair contract and nothing less. https://t.co/YYXdpziZBu
— Chris Murphy 🟧 (@ChrisMurphyCT) May 5, 2025
Proud to join striking Pratt machinists in East Hartford—standing up for fair pay, pensions, job security & more.
DENVER – Colorado Governor Jared Polis congratulated the new Pope and Colorado’s Catholic community on this historic occasion.
“This is a joyous occasion for Catholics across the world. I congratulate the Catholic community on the historic selection of the first American Pope, Cardinal Robert Francis Prevost, who will lead the church as Pope Leo XIV. I look forward to continued strong collaboration between Colorado and the Catholic Church on helping vulnerable people in times of need. It is my hope that the new Pope follows the path of the late Pope Francis of love and kindness for all who walk the earth,” said Governor Jared Polis.
Headline: Pioneering African American Hospital in Greensboro to be Featured on N.C. Highway Historical Marker
Pioneering African American Hospital in Greensboro to be Featured on N.C. Highway Historical Marker jejohnson6
A hospital built to meet the needs of Greensboro’s African American community during the days of segregation soon will be recognized with a North Carolina Highway Historical Marker.
The marker commemorating L. Richardson Memorial Hospital will be dedicated during an indoor ceremony at Barber Park Event Center in Greensboro, N.C. (1500 Barber Park Dr., Greensboro, N.C.) on Thursday, May 15 at 11:30 a.m. The marker will be installed at the corner of Washington Street and Benbow Street following the ceremony.
L. Richardson Memorial Hospital was the first modern African American hospital facility in Greensboro and the only early modern hospital in the city where the original building survives. Richardson Memorial was preceded by two small institutions, Cordice Sanitarium which opened around 1914, and Trinity Hospital for Negroes, a private facility co-founded by Dr. S.P. Sebastian that opened in 1918.
The Greensboro Negro Hospital Association, which was created Jan. 20, 1923, sought a larger, modern facility for Greensboro’s African American residents. When the hospital opened in 1927, it had 60 beds. Monetary donations provided X-ray machinery and surgical equipment. A nursing school was established at the hospital in 1929 before it merged in 1954 with the nursing program at North Carolina A&T College. In 1934, the Greensboro Negro Hospital Association was renamed the L. Richardson Memorial Hospital, after Lunsford Richardson, pharmacist and founder of the Vick Chemical Company.
Richardson Memorial operated at its original location on South Benbow Road until June 1966 when it moved to Southside Boulevard. Renovations through the years added new patient beds and new equipment. In 1935, the hospital treated 900 patients annually and by 1955 the number had grown to 5,325 patients.
Until the 1960s, African American residents in Greensboro had hospital access only to Richardson Memorial until theSimkins v. Conecase led to the integration of hospitals. Ironically, this 1963 court decision resulted in the slow demise of the hospital, as many patients switched to integrated facilities. Financial problems mounted as the number of patients declined.
The hospital continued to operate as an independent local hospital devoted to the needs of the African American community until April 1994. When Louisville-based Vencor purchased Richardson Memorial in December 1993, it was renamed Vencor Greensboro. The hospital pivoted to providing specialized care for chronically ill patients. Following Vencor’s emergence from bankruptcy in 2001, the corporation changed its name to Kindred Healthcare. Today, the building is operated under the name Kindred Hospital.
For more information about the historical marker, please visithttps://www.dncr.nc.gov/blog/2024/08/09/l-richardson-memorial-hospital-j-128, or call (919) 814-6625.
The Highway Historical Marker Program is a collaboration between the N.C. departments of Natural and Cultural Resources and Transportation.
About the North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources The N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources (DNCR) manages, promotes, and enhances the things that people love about North Carolina – its diverse arts and culture, rich history, and spectacular natural areas. Through its programs, the department enhances education, stimulates economic development, improves public health, expands accessibility, and strengthens community resiliency.
The department manages over 100 locations across the state, including 27 historic sites, seven history museums, two art museums, five science museums, four aquariums, 35 state parks, four recreation areas, dozens of state trails and natural areas, the North Carolina Zoo, the State Library, the State Archives, the N.C. Arts Council, the African American Heritage Commission, the American Indian Heritage Commission, the State Historic Preservation Office, the Office of State Archaeology, the Highway Historical Markers program, the N.C. Land and Water Fund, and the Natural Heritage Program. For more information, please visit www.dncr.nc.gov.
Headline: Junior Docent Workshop Planned at Museum of the Albemarle
Junior Docent Workshop Planned at Museum of the Albemarle jejohnson6
ELIZABETH CITY
The Museum of the Albemarle will host a Junior Docent Workshop on Thursday, June 12, from 10 a.m. – 2 p.m. for teens ages 13–17. Enjoy group activities and gain experience with the public while learning to help the museum – this summer and year-round – with programs and behind-the-scenes assistance. The opportunity awaits you to meet people, participate in special events, and learn more about our region and state. Become a Junior Docent and help keep North Carolina’s heritage alive.
The workshop is free, but pre-registration is required. Emailnoah.janis@dncr.nc.govor call 252-335-1453 to register. The deadline to sign up for this workshop is June 9.
About the Museum of the Albemarle
The Museum of the Albemarle is located at 501 S. Water Street, Elizabeth City, NC. (252) 335-1453.www.museumofthealbemarle.com. Find us on Facebook! Hours are Monday through Saturday, 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Closed Sundays and State Holidays. Serving Bertie, Camden, Chowan, Currituck, Dare, Gates, Hertford, Hyde, Northampton, Pasquotank, Perquimans, Tyrrell, and Washington Counties, the museum is the northeast regional history museum of the North Carolina Division of State History Museums within the N.C.
Department of Natural and Cultural Resources, the state agency with the mission to enrich lives and communities and the vision to harness the state’s cultural resources to build North Carolina’s social, cultural, and economic future. Information is available 24/7 atwww.dncr.nc.gov.
About the North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
The N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources (DNCR) manages, promotes, and enhances the things that people love about North Carolina – its diverse arts and culture, rich history, and spectacular natural areas. Through its programs, the department enhances education, stimulates economic development, improves public health, expands accessibility, and strengthens community resiliency.
The department manages over 100 locations across the state, including 27 historic sites, seven history museums, two art museums, five science museums, four aquariums, 35 state parks, four recreation areas, dozens of state trails and natural areas, the N.C. Zoo, the State Library, the State Archives, the N.C. Arts Council, the African American Heritage Commission, the American Indian Heritage Commission, the State Historic Preservation Office, the Office of State Archaeology, the Highway Historical Markers program, the N.C. Land and Water Fund, and the Natural Heritage Program. For more information, please visitwww.dncr.nc.gov.
Headline: N.C. Aquarium at Fort Fisher to Begin Transformative Project This Fall
N.C. Aquarium at Fort Fisher to Begin Transformative Project This Fall jejohnson6
KURE BEACH
Guided by a commitment to conservation, education, and passion for inspiring the community to protect the environment, the North Carolina Aquarium at Fort Fisher (NCAFF) is launching the first phase of a $65 million expansion and renovation later this year.At the heart of this unprecedented project is the largest shark habitat in North Carolina, deepening community connections and expanding the Aquarium into the largest in the state. This multi-year renovation will transform the visitor experience on an extraordinary scale.
“This project is about more than updating our facilities; it’s about moving boldly into the future, with a reimagined visitor experience unlike any other in the state,” said Hap Fatzinger, director for the North Carolina Aquariums Division. “We’re creating new, dynamic spaces that educate, connect, and empower our community.”
Along with the expansive new shark habitat, the project includes an interactive touch pool, a live coral reef habitat, a state-of-the-art education centerwith a seamless pathway to outdoor learning,and a breathtaking rooftop sky deck. Students, educators, and families will come face-to-fin with the aquatic world in meaningful, lasting ways, discovering new experiential opportunities toconnect with science, and conservation.The Aquarium will begin construction on the expansion later this year. The North Carolina Aquariums are a division of the North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources.
NC Aquarium Society Support
The North Carolina Aquarium Society launchedBeneath the Surface: The Campaign for the North Carolina Aquariumsto support this expansion. This campaign isa bold initiativeto transform the way people of all ages learn about and engage with aquaticlife and issupporting major renovation efforts at all three North Carolina Aquariums and Jennette’s Pierwith the primary focus on the renovation of the NC Aquarium at Fort Fisher.
This campaign has already raised more than $60 million thanks to support from the State of North Carolina and generous early supporters, including $2 million fromthe State Employees Credit Union Foundationand $7.5 million fromThe Endowment in New Hanover County.Additional funds are needed to support the work at all the sites.The Aquarium Society is initiating the public phase of the campaign andinvites all who value aquatic education and conservation to support.
“We’re incredibly grateful for the generous investments we’ve already received,” saidLiz Baird, NC Aquarium Society President & CEO. “We now ask our community to help us cross the finish line. Every donation, no matter the size, will make waves and bring us closer to ensuring that aquatic life in North Carolina flourishes for generations to come.”
For more information on the capital campaign or to donate, visitwww.ncaquariumsociety.com/campaign.
Looking to the Future
While the Aquarium undergoes this monumental transformation, the facility will close to the public this fall. Follow the NCAFF social media channels to find updates and information as the project unfolds.
Online Tickets Required The Aquarium is anticipating a busy summer season. Visitors should plan their visit as spots fill up quickly. Online reservations are required to visit the Aquarium atNCAFF Tickets.
###
About the North Carolina Aquarium at Fort Fisher The North Carolina Aquarium at Fort Fisher is just south of Kure Beach, a short drive from Wilmington on U.S. 421 and less than a mile from the Fort Fisher ferry terminal. The Aquarium is one of three Aquariums and a pier that make up the North Carolina Aquariums, a division of the Department of Natural and Cultural Resources. The mission of the Aquarium is to inspire appreciation and conservation of our aquatic environments. The Aquarium features a 235-000-gallon sand tiger shark habitat, an albino alligator, a bald eagle, a loggerhead sea turtle habitat and two families of mischievous Asian small-clawed otters.The Aquarium is accredited through the Association of Zoos and Aquariums (AZA).
Hours: 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. daily. Admission: $12.95 ages 13-61; $10.95 children ages 3-12; $11.95 seniors (62 and older) and military with valid identification; NC EBT card holders*: $3. Free admission for children 2 and younger and N.C. Aquarium Society members and N.C. Zoo members. *EBT rate is applicable to a maximum of four tickets.
About the North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources The N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources (DNCR) manages, promotes, and enhances the things that people love about North Carolina – its diverse arts and culture, rich history, and spectacular natural areas. Through its programs, the department enhances education, stimulates economic development, improves public health, expands accessibility, and strengthens community resiliency.
The department manages over 100 locations across the state, including 27 historic sites, seven history museums, two art museums, five science museums, four aquariums, 35 state parks, four recreation areas, dozens of state trails and natural areas, the North Carolina Zoo, the State Library, the State Archives, the N.C. Arts Council, the African American Heritage Commission, the American Indian Heritage Commission, the State Historic Preservation Office, the Office of State Archaeology, the Highway Historical Markers program, the N.C. Land and Water Fund, and the Natural Heritage Program. For more information, please visit www.dncr.nc.gov.
About North Carolina Aquarium Society
The North Carolina Aquarium Society is a nonprofit (501c3) organization dedicated to supporting the North Carolina Aquariums through private fundraising, membership, and revenue generation. Established in 1986, the society partners with the N.C. Aquariums to enhance exhibits, animal care, education programs, and conservation initiatives beyond what state funding provides.
Headline: Alamance Battleground to Host ‘Fight for the Backcountry,’ the Battle of Alamance Reenactment May 17
Alamance Battleground to Host ‘Fight for the Backcountry,’ the Battle of Alamance Reenactment May 17 jejohnson6
BURLINGTON
Alamance Battleground State Historic Site will host a reenactment of the 1771 Battle of Alamance on Saturday, May 17, 10 a.m.- 4 p.m.
The event marks the 254th anniversary of the battle, the violent conclusion of the Regulator Movement in North Carolina. In addition to the battle reenactment, the program will feature artillery demonstrations, an 18th-century hospital, and living history interpreters portraying colonial life. The battle reenactment begins at 11 a.m. and a special guided tour of the battlefield will be offered at 3 p.m. Admission is $5 for adults and $2 for children, seniors, and military.
In the 1760s, North Carolina farmers calling themselves the Regulators — named for their desire to “regulate” public officials — acted against a corrupt colonial government. After years of working to address their concerns peacefully by holding meetings, filing lawsuits, and writing petitions, which were largely ignored, the movement took a violent turn in 1770. The Regulators attacked corrupt local officials in Hillsborough, N.C., forcing a response by colonial Gov. William Tryon.
Gov. Tryon led a militia of 1,000 men to face off against 2,000 Regulators in the Battle of Alamance on May 16, 1771. Although the Regulators outnumbered Tryon’s forces, the Regulator uprising was crushed. After his victory, Tryon moved through the North Carolina backcountry, forcing the Regulators and their sympathizers to sign loyalty oaths.
After the American Revolution, the memory of this battle shifted from fighting between factions in North Carolina into a fight between Patriots and British troops. Because of this revision, the battle became erroneously known as the “first battle of the American Revolution.” In fact, during the Revolution, many Regulators remained loyal to the crown while some men who fought with Tryon sided with the Patriots in the war for American independence.
About Alamance Battleground Alamance Battleground State Historic Site preserves and interprets the legacy of the Battle of Alamance. On May 16, 1771, an armed group of 2,000 farmers, known as the Regulators, confronted the royal militia of colonial Governor William Tryon. The Regulators stood for moderate reforms and accountable government, and they were massacred. The site is located at5803 NC 62 S, Burlington, N.C.For more information, visithttps://historicsites.nc.gov/all-sites/alamance-battlegroundor call 336-227-4785.
About the North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources The N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources (DNCR) manages, promotes, and enhances the things that people love about North Carolina – its diverse arts and culture, rich history, and spectacular natural areas. Through its programs, the department enhances education, stimulates economic development, improves public health, expands accessibility, and strengthens community resiliency.
The department manages over 100 locations across the state, including 27 historic sites, seven history museums, two art museums, five science museums, four aquariums, 35 state parks, four recreation areas, dozens of state trails and natural areas, the North Carolina Zoo, the State Library, the State Archives, the N.C. Arts Council, the African American Heritage Commission, the American Indian Heritage Commission, the State Historic Preservation Office, the Office of State Archaeology, the Highway Historical Markers program, the N.C. Land and Water Fund, and the Natural Heritage Program. For more information, please visit www.dncr.nc.gov.
Headline: North Carolina Museum of History Lends Thomas Day Masterpiece to the Metropolitan Museum of Art
North Carolina Museum of History Lends Thomas Day Masterpiece to the Metropolitan Museum of Art jejohnson6
While the North Carolina Museum of History’s physical building remains closed for renovation, the museum’s mission continues through partnerships, public programs, and storytelling that share North Carolina’s history far beyond its walls. The museum is proud to announce that a piece from its collection will be featured in Superfine: Tailoring Black Style, the highly anticipated spring 2025 exhibition at the Metropolitan Museum of Art.
Timed to debut alongside the Met Gala, Superfine explores the cultural and historical significance of Black style and dandyism from the 18th century to the present. The exhibition will highlight the intersection of African and European style traditions through a presentation of garments, accessories, paintings, photographs, decorative arts and more.
The museum has loaned a striking mid-19th-century dresser by Thomas Day, a free Black cabinetmaker who lived and worked in Milton, North Carolina. Known for his sophisticated, sculptural approach to furniture and architectural design, Day’s work blended classical European influences with bold, original forms. The museum holds the largest collection of Day’s work in the country.
“It’s incredibly meaningful to see Thomas Day’s work recognized globally,” said John Campbell, collections management section chief at the North Carolina Museum of History. “Day carved beauty and power into every piece he created. Seeing his work spotlighted at The Met is a powerful reminder that his story, and the stories his work carries, continue to have a lasting impact.”
Superfine: Tailoring Black Style is on view at The Met Fifth Avenue from May 10 to Oct. 26, 2025. The exhibition’s opening coincides with the 2025 Met Gala on May 5, co-chaired by Colman Domingo, Lewis Hamilton, A$AP Rocky, Pharrell Williams, and Anna Wintour, with LeBron James serving as honorary chair.
About the N.C. Museum of History
The North Carolina Museum of History, a Smithsonian Affiliate, fosters a passion for North Carolina history. This museum collects and preserves artifacts of state history and educates the public on the history of the state and the nation through exhibits and educational programs. In 2024, more than 275,000 people visited the museum to see some of the 150,000 artifacts in the museum collection. Located in the heart of downtown Raleigh, the North Carolina Museum of History serves as the flagship historical institution of the Division of State History Museums. This division, part of the N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources, includes seven regional history museums dedicated to preserving and interpreting the stories of North Carolina’s past.
About the Smithsonian Affiliations Network
Since 2006, the North Carolina Museum of History has been a Smithsonian Affiliate, part of a select group of museums and cultural, educational and arts organizations that share Smithsonian resources with the nation. The Smithsonian Affiliations network is a national outreach program that develops long-term collaborative partnerships with museums and other educational and cultural organizations to enrich communities with Smithsonian resources. More information is available ataffiliations.si.edu.
About the North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
The N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources (DNCR) manages, promotes, and enhances the things that people love about North Carolina – its diverse arts and culture, rich history, and spectacular natural areas. Through its programs, the department enhances education, stimulates economic development, improves public health, expands accessibility, and strengthens community resiliency.
The department manages over 100 locations across the state, including 27 historic sites, seven history museums, two art museums, five science museums, four aquariums, 35 state parks, four recreation areas, dozens of state trails and natural areas, the N.C. Zoo, the State Library, the State Archives, the N.C. Arts Council, the African American Heritage Commission, the American Indian Heritage Commission, the State Historic Preservation Office, the Office of State Archaeology, the Highway Historical Markers program, the N.C. Land and Water Fund, and the Natural Heritage Program. For more information, please visitwww.dncr.nc.gov.
This article was first published in The Conversation UK’s World Affairs Briefing email newsletter. Sign up to receive weekly analysis of the latest developments in international relations, direct to your inbox.
Once again, India and Pakistan are locked in conflict over Kashmir. A diplomatic crisis that started with a terrorist attack that killed 26 tourists, all but one of them Indian, became a fortnight of cross-border skirmishes and pugilistic posturing from New Delhi and Islamabad. India responded on May 7 with Operation Sindoor, a series of airstrikes apparently aimed at what India said were terrorist training camps, in which at least 31 people were reportedly killed. Pakistan has vowed revenge and launched its own deadly attacks. And so an old emnity is rekindled.
India and Pakistan have been at loggerheads over Kashmir virtually since partition in 1947. Its mixed population, its geography and, importantly, its history as what was known as a “princely state”, virtually guaranteed it. Princely states, which were not administered by the British Raj were given the choice of joining either independent India or the newly created Pakistan. Kashmir, ruled over by the Hindu maharaja Hari Singh, eventually joined India.
Hari Singh reportedly did so with some misgivings. The state he ruled over had a majority population of Muslims. But when the first conflict broke out at the end of 1947, with an invasion by Pakistani tribesmen looking to take control of Kashmir, he called on India for assistance and signed a deal temporarily incorporating the state into India pending a plebiscite – which never took place.
The first India-Pakistan war ended in 1949 with a UN-mandated ceasefire. A border was drawn through the state giving India roughly two-thirds control over Jammu and Kashmir, with Pakistan controlling the other third. Both sides have claimed the whole territory ever since.
Violence has broken out periodically in the intervening decades, characterised since the 1980s by insurgencies, which India routinely accuses Pakistan of backing – an accusation which Pakistan routinely denies. Groups such as Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) and Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM) have carried out terror attacks in both Kashmir and India, including LeT’s 2008 Mumbai massacre in which 166 people were killed.
Sign up to receive our weekly World Affairs Briefing newsletter from The Conversation UK. Every Thursday we’ll bring you expert analysis of the big stories in international relations.
Now the situation which the rest of the world has worried about for years, a conflict between two neighbouring nuclear armed powers, has begun to escalate with fears it might spiral out of control. Natasha Lindsteadt, an expert in international security, takes a look at the military – and nuclear– capabilities and policies of the two countries.
She writes that India has a far larger military (it’s ranked as one of the world’s top five military nations by Military Watch magazine, with Pakistan ranked ninth). The two countries have a roughly comparable nuclear arsenal. But while India has a “no first use” policy, Pakistan has never committed itself in this way, arguing it needs its nuclear arsenal to counter India’s larger conventional forces.
But even a small nuclear exchange between the two could kill more than 20 million people, writes Lindsteadt.
Part of the problem seems to be a complete lack of communications at the highest level. US president, Donald Trump, initially appeared reluctant to get involved, saying that he is “sure they’ll figure it out one way or the other … There’s great tension between Pakistan and India, but there always has been.” He is since reported to have offered to step in, an offer apparently politely rejected by New Delhi.
“What is needed now is robust, real-time crisis communication between the two nations,” write security experts Syed Ali Zia Jaffery of the University of Lahore and Nicholas Wheeler of the University of Birmingham. The problem is that there is no mechanism for that.
And as we know from the Cuban missile crisis, when the US and Soviet Union came very close to a nuclear exchange, it’s all too easy for mistakes to be made which could escalate a conflict between two nuclear powers into a conflagration.
After that crisis, the two leaders involved, John F. Kennedy and Nikita Krushchev, set up a communications link (which became known as the “hotline”) to enable direct communications. As Jaffery and Wheeler point out, this served to keep the rival powers from further dangerous confrontation (it even helped in bringing about arms treaties when Ronald Reagan was in the White House and Mikhail Gorbachev was in the Kremlin.
For a deeper dive into the crisis and the long history of conflict between India and Pakistan, here are five essential reads, carefully curated for you by my colleague Matt Williams, senior international editor at The Conversation in the US.
In the Middle East, meanwhile, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) are planning to move in large numbers into Gaza with a plan to occupy the whole of the territory. The prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, has described the move as a “forceful operation” which will destroy Hamas and rescue its remaining hostages. The remaining population of 2.1 million Palestinian civilians will be moved “to proect it”.
With more than 50,000 people dead in Gaza since the conflict began in October 2023, you have to say Israel’s attempts to protect civilians have been decidedly unsuccessful.
Leonie Fleischmann, senior lecturer in international politics at City St George’s, University of London, sees this as Israel’s next step towards clearing Gaza of Palestinians, something she says Netanyahu’s far-right enablers have been pushing for all along. But she also sees parallels with what is happening in the West Bank, where Israel is gradually annexing land occupied by Palestinians and mandated by the Oslo accords of the 1990s as part of a future Palestinian state.
The recent Louis Theroux documentary film showed the terrible circumstances under which Palestinians live on the West Bank, juxtaposing that with the determination of extreme Zionists to take over what they see as the land of their forefathers.
Fleischmann notes that this week, Israeli cabinet minister Bezalel Smotrich approved plans for construction on land in an area which, if given to settlers, would effectively cut the West Bank in two. This would, she says, “bury any remaining hope for a two-state solution”. Rather chillingly, Smotrich is quoted as saying: “This is how you kill the Palestinian state.”
Where would Palestinians go under Netanyahu’s plan? Well, if the Israeli prime minister shares Donald Trump’s vision of redeveloping Gaza as some sort of Middle Eastern “riviera”, they’d be dispersed into countries such as Egypt and Jordan.
This idea is a non-starter, writes Scott Lucas of University College Dublin. Lucas, a Middle East expert who has written regularly for us about Israel and Gaza and answered our questions about the situation. He says Egyptian president, Abdel Fattah al-Sisi has definitively ruled out accepting a mass exodus of Palestinians via the Rafah crossing at Gaza’s southern end. And Jordan is equally unwilling to accept any more Palestinian refugees. Apart from anything else, it already has about 3 million.
As Lucas writes: “Any Arab government that takes in Gazans, even amid a humanitarian crisis, would be tacitly burying the idea of a Palestinian state. That would break a 77-year-old principle and resurrect the Nakba – the forced displacement and ethnic cleansing of Palestinians in 1948.”
Israel is unlikely to get much international support for such a move either, Lucas adds. Donald Trump is preoccupied with other things and, even if he weren’t, the rest of the international community would hardly stand for what would probably be seen as an act of ethnic cleansing on a massive scale.
But what do ordinary Israelis think of their government’s plans for Gaza? For most Israelis the paramount factor is their security. So far the Netanyahu government’s actions in Gaza had enjoyed majority suppport for that reason and in the hope that somehow the conflict might lead to getting the remaining hostages home.
But the latest plan to take Gaza completely could scupper any hope of repatriating the hostages. And there are signs that many Israelis are getting tired of the constant crisis and conflict. There appears to be a growing appetite for peace.
Or so writes Yuval Katz of Loughborough University, who grew up in Israel but left eight years ago to pursue an academic career. He was recently home for the first time in two years and spent time contacting peace groups. Here is what he found.
WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, Congressman Nick Langworthy (NY-23) announced that the Town of Wellsville has been awarded $128,436 by the Department of Transportation for the Wellsville Municipal Airport.
Specifically, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) awarded this grant for Wellsville Municipal to conduct a new airport-wide obstruction survey. This is an evaluation that would determine if there is any object that may affect the national airspace, air navigation facilities, or airport capacity.
“As the chairman of the House Aviation Safety Caucus, I am pleased that the FAA is investing in small local airports such as Wellsville Municipal,” said Congressman Langworthy. “This funding will be used to ensure that the airspace and facilities at Wellsville Municipal are of the highest standard – because when it comes to aviation safety, everyone’s lives are on the line.”
Source: United States House of Representatives – Congresswoman Claudia Tenney (NY-22)
Washington, DC – Congresswoman Claudia Tenney (NY-24) today joined President Donald J. Trump and First Lady Melania Trump at the White House for a celebration of Military Mothers.
Rep Tenney is the mother of U.S. Naval Academy graduate Trey Cleary, who is an active-duty Major in the U.S. Marine Corps.
“Thank you to President Trump and First Lady Melania Trump for welcoming military mothers to the White House today. It is encouraging to see this administration’s strong support for our military and their families, recognizing their sacrifices and ensuring they receive the respect and resources they deserve. As the mother of an active-duty Marine, it is a true honor to stand among so many who share that bond. I am deeply grateful for my son, Trey, and his service to our country,” said Congresswoman Tenney.
Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman August Pfluger (TX-11)
ICYMI: Rep. Pfluger’s Legislation to Keep the CCP Out of American Classrooms and Universities Passes the House
Washington, May 8, 2025
WASHINGTON, DC — In Case You Missed It (ICYMI): Congressman August Pfluger (TX-11), Chairman of the House Committee on Homeland Security’s Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence, had legislation pass through the U.S. House of Representatives.
Chairman Pfluger’s “DHS Restrictions on Confucius Institutes Act“ will defend American students from the Chinese Communist Party by prohibiting any Department of Homeland Security (DHS) funding from flowing to universities that host a Confucius Institute or maintain a relationship with a Chinese entity of concern.
In an exclusive interview on the House steps, Chairman Pfluger spoke with the Daily Mail about this legislation. Read more HERE or by clicking the image below.
Additionally, watch Chairman Pfluger’s remarks on the House floor in support of his legislation HERE and read even more about it in the Daily Caller HERE.
Nestled within the interior wetlands, grasslands, and riparian habitats of California’s northern Sacramento Valley, the Sacramento National Wildlife Refuge (NWR) embodies the core mission of the National Wildlife Refuge System: protecting wildlife, native vegetation, and the habitats they depend on for the benefit of present and future generations. Established in 1937, the refuge spans approximately 10,819 acres, providing essential habitat for migratory birds along the Pacific Flyway, the western migration path for millions of birds each year.
Unlike national parks, which balance public enjoyment with natural and cultural preservation, national wildlife refuges are managed with a primary focus on protecting wildlife, habitat, and ecological function. While recreational activities such as wildlife viewing, photography, hiking, and hunting are encouraged at Sacramento NWR, each is carefully managed to ensure they do not impede the refuge’s conservation objectives. Management practices include regulating water levels, planting native vegetation, controlling invasive species, and collaborating with local farmers to maintain optimal habitat conditions for wildlife.
Sacramento NWR serves as the headquarters for the Sacramento National Wildlife Refuge Complex, which encompasses five national wildlife refuges: Sacramento, Delevan, Colusa, Sutter, and Sacramento River, as well as three wildlife management areas: Willow Creek-Lurline, Butte Sink, and Steve Thompson North Central Valley. Collectively, the complex protects a diverse array of habitats across multiple counties, offering migratory birds and other wildlife the necessary resources to thrive.
The refuge complex supports a rich diversity of species, including migratory waterfowl like snow geese, which travel thousands of miles from breeding grounds in Canada, Alaska, and Russia to winter in the Sacramento Valley. Other notable species include tule elk, vernal pool fairy shrimp, giant garter snakes, and various native plant communities.
Recognizing that ecological boundaries extend beyond refuge borders, Sacramento NWR engages in ongoing monitoring and research to address external environmental challenges, such as agricultural runoff and pesticide drift. These efforts inform adaptive management strategies aimed at mitigating impacts and enhancing habitat quality within the refuge.
Each winter, visitors can witness the spectacular sight of thousands of snow geese taking flight at sunrise, a testament to the refuge’s vital role in wildlife conservation. In spring, fields of goldfields wildflowers brighten the landscape, offering a different kind of spectacle. The auto tour route, observation decks, and educational programs provide opportunities for people of all ages and abilities to connect with nature and learn about the importance of preserving these critical habitats.
The Ontario Coroner’s reports cover two aspects of medical assistance in dying (MAID): waiver of final consent, and same- or next-day provision of MAID.(Shutterstock)
The MAID Death Review Committee — of which I am a member — reviews cases of Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID) that are selected by the coroner’s MAID team for the common issues they raise. The review helps inform policy recommendations.
Some of the cases suggest a troubling prioritizing of ending patients’ lives with MAID rather than a precautionary approach. In my opinion, they reveal an urgent need for more rigorous legal and professional standards. Committee members’ starkly contrasting views on the ethics of some of the practices, which can be gleaned from the anonymous summaries of the committee’s discussions, are striking.
Most assisted dying laws or policies in other countries prohibit same-day provision of MAID and waiving of final consent. (Shutterstock)
Access over protection
The topics of the reports illustrate how Canada’s MAID law reform has prioritized access over protection. Most assisted dying laws or policies in other countries prohibit same-day provision of MAID and waiving of final consent. Many impose a reflection period to protect patients against rushed and desperate decision-making, for example following a devastating diagnosis.
Before 2021, Canada’s MAID law had a 10-day reflection period, which could be shortened by request. This was removed in the 2021 expansion of MAID, which also removed the safeguard of a reasonably foreseeable natural death.
The coroner’s report on waiver of final consent includes cases, and notes on case discussions, that demonstrate the fine line between flexible use of such waivers and circumventing the prohibition of advance request. In some cases, it appears that different guidance documents of the Canadian Association of MAID Assessors and Providers have been combined to facilitate MAID: guidance on waiver of final consent and on dementia.
In a journal publication, my co-authors and I warned that combining these guidance documents, which we consider to be obfuscating, could lead to advance requests for MAID even though they remain prohibited under the criminal code.
Case reports
Take the case of Mr. A. Distressed by short-term memory loss and a diagnosis of an onset of Alzheimer’s disease, he signed a waiver scheduling MAID 3.5 years later. Some, but not all, members of the committee opined that scheduling it so much in advance was incompatible with a track 1 approval, since it revealed that he was not approaching his death, not in an advanced state of irreversible decline of capability and could hardly be considered to suffer intolerably at the time of approval.
The MAID provider ended up not using the waiver for Mr. A’s consent for MAID. However, his MAID death remains problematic due to concerns about how the provider accepted he was able to provide final consent.
Less than a year after signing the waiver, he was hospitalized after a fall. He was deemed delirious, confused and had hallucinations. During “a period of cognitive improvement” the MAID provider deemed him capable of confirming final consent and provided MAID based on the original assessment.
Family pressures, such as caregiver burnout, need to be sufficiently investigated. (Shutterstock)
Informed consent concerns also arose in the case of 80-year-old Mrs. B, who told a first MAID assessor she preferred palliative care because of personal and religious values. When a palliative care physician noticed her husband’s “caregiver burnout,” he requested hospice care for Mrs. B, which was rejected.
Her husband then contacted a second MAID assessor, who approved her for MAID and who rejected the first assessor’s request to talk to Mrs. B. the next day. A third assessor confirmed the second assessor’s approval and Mrs. B received MAID the same day.
The case of Mr. C involved a man in his 70s, diagnosed with metastatic cancer, who requested a MAID assessment five days after admission into palliative care. But before he could be assessed, he experienced cognitive decline and “loss of ability to communicate.”
When the palliative care team told a MAID provider the next day that he had lost capacity to consent, the provider “vigorously roused Mr. C., who opened his eyes and mouthed ‘yes’” when asked if he wanted MAID. After withholding pain medication for 45 minutes, the provider considered him more “alert.” A second MAID assessor confirmed his eligibility after an online assessment, also accepting mouthing yes, and “nodding his head in presumed agreeance” as clear and capable informed consent, and he was euthanized.
These and some other cases described in the committee reports raise several concerns. They show how MAID has been provided in cases where assessors clearly disagree about the application of access criteria, with two seemingly limited assessments favouring MAID overriding others.
Some patients received MAID after capacity and informed consent procedures that appear problematic, in the case of Mr. C overriding a capacity assessment by a treating palliative care team. Family pressures, such as caregiver burnout, may also be insufficiently investigated, as in the case of Mrs. B.
And MAID appears to have been delivered in the case of Mr. C. when the patient appeared otherwise comfortable in palliative care and may not have had capacity to consent.
The reports also reveal that even patients specifically hospitalized for suicidal ideation and in need of mental health care are offered MAID, as earlier coroner reports already revealed. Some cases appear to stretch the contours of MAID law.
Starkly differing views
The committee discussions included in the report further suggest starkly different views among MAID Death Review Committee members, including on standards for assessing capacity for consent.
As discussed in a recent study I co-authored, most of Canada’s MAID practice is driven by a relatively small group of frequent providers. The study found that there are 1,837 MAID providers in Canada, but up to 336 of these are frequent providers who are likely responsible for the majority of annual MAID deaths. This adds to concerns about arguably overly flexible provision of MAID among these providers.
To date there have been no known cases of criminal or professional sanctions against a MAID provider. However, the Chief Coroner’s reports, as well as mediareports, indicate that this does not mean Canada’s MAID practice is exemplary, safe and compliant. When reading these cases, many likely wonder, as I do, what it will take for political, judicial and professional authorities to provide firmer guidance, investigate thoroughly and put a halt to problematic delivery of MAID.
The UN committee cited the earlier coroner reports. The two most recent reports, which the UN committee did not have yet at its disposal, clearly confirm the urgent need for a revisiting of our MAID law, and for refocusing on protection, not on further expansion.
Trudo Lemmens is a member of the Chief Coroner of Ontario MAID Death Review Committee. He has been an expert witness for the Federal Attorney General in the Truchon and Lamb cases. He has been an advisor to the Vulnerable Person Standard. His research is partly funded by a Scholl Chair in Health Law and Policy. He is co-editor of a McGill/Queens University Press book Unravelling MAID in Canada: Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide as Medical Care.
Source: United States Senator John Kennedy (Louisiana)
Watch Kennedy’s comments here.
WASHINGTON – The Senate passed Sen. John Kennedy’s (R-La.) joint resolution of disapproval under Congressional Review Act (CRA) procedures to block an Office of Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) rule that delays the bank merger approval process by adding more red tape that could lead to consumer uncertainty.
The Biden administration’srule, which went into effect on Jan. 1, 2025, amended the Bank Merger Act of 1960 to make it harder for the OCC to approve healthy bank mergers quickly. Kennedy’s resolution would reverse the Biden administration’s misguided rule so that banks can stay in business and serve hardworking Americans.
Kennedy spoke on the Senate floor ahead of the resolution’s passage. Key excerpts of the speech are below:
“Well, President Biden’s people at the OCC decided that [the rule] wasn’t broken; so they were going to fix it. Again, I don’t hate anybody, but you have got to call it like you see it.
“I think the folks at President Biden’s OCC got up one day and thought there was an award for being stupid. They took this very simple and effective rule and procedure, and they turned it on its head. What they did was tier-one level moronic.”
. . .
“I am going to ask the Senate to reject President Biden’s cumbersome rule. . . . That doesn’t mean that the OCC can’t revisit it at some point, but let me just be blunt: What President Biden’s OCC people did was put together a plan—a new rule—that looks like it was put together by a heroin addict with a socket wrench. I mean, it is the most convoluted thing you have ever seen.
“If we vote yes today—and I hope we do—then we will reject this rule and go back to doing it the old way.”
Background:
Historically, the OCC assumed that a potential merger passed muster if the agency took no action on a merger application within 15 days. The burden of showing that a merger would harm business and consumers fell on the OCC and bank regulators.
The Biden administration’s rule shifted the burden of proof to individual banks, making it harder for banks—particularly community banks—to fulfill their obligations by making smart, strategic mergers.
Sens. Bill Hagerty (R-Tenn.), Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), Tim Scott (R-S.C.), Steve Daines (R-Mont.) and Bernie Moreno (R-Ohio) cosponsored the resolution.
“The Biden OCC rule restricting bank mergers would lead to less competition in the industry and reduce access to credit and important services for Americans. I’m proud to join Senator Kennedy’s effort to overturn this rule and allow the free market to decide how financial institutions can best serve their customers,” said Scott, chairman of the Senate Banking Committee.
“The Biden bank merger rule was a solution in search of a problem and embodies the overzealous rulemaking that defined the last Administration. Lacking any basis in sound banking policy, this regulation added more red tape and disproportionally burdened and harmed the competitiveness of small and mid-size banks by deterring beneficial business combinations,” said Daines.
The resolution will now move to the House of Representatives for consideration. Rep. Andy Barr (R-Ky.), chairman of the Financial Institutions Subcommittee on the House Financial Services Committee, has introduced the companion resolution.
“With President Trump restoring regulatory sanity in Washington, I’m proud to partner with Senator Kennedy on this effort to overturn the Joe Biden’s OCC’s flawed bank merger rule. This resolution upholds the integrity of our financial system by ensuring that merger applications are evaluated based on clear, consistent standards—not arbitrary political agendas. Community and regional banks deserve a regulatory framework that supports growth, innovation, and expanded access to credit,” said Barr.
The American Bankers Association (ABA) supports Kennedy’s resolution.
“ABA has long believed that bank mergers should be subject to clear and transparent standards, and that regulators should act in a timely and fair manner when considering applications. Unfortunately, the final rule the OCC approved last September created unhelpful and biased new standards—including arbitrary asset thresholds—without providing the clarity and predictability that banks and their customers need. We applaud today’s Senate passage of the Congressional Review Act resolution nullifying the OCC’s merger rule and thank Sen. Kennedy for his leadership on this important issue. We now urge the House to quickly pass the companion resolution introduced by Rep. Andy Barr so regulators can correct this flawed rule and establish a new framework that reflects today’s financial services landscape and promotes competition that strengthens our financial system,” said Rob Nichols, President and CEO of the ABA.
Source: United States Senator for North Dakota John Hoeven
05.08.25
USDA Application Process for Weather-Based Disaster Aid to Begin in Coming Weeks
WASHINGTON – Senator John Hoeven, chairman of the Senate Agriculture Appropriations Committee, this week secured a commitment from Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins to prioritize Farm Service Agency (FSA) staff and field offices to ensure frontline support for the nation’s farmers and ranchers. Additionally, the senator outlined the importance of the $33.5 billion in agriculture disaster aid he secured at the end of the year in providing farmers and ranchers with a bridge as Congress works to improve crop insurance and update reference prices in the next farm bill. Hoeven thanked Secretary Rollins for delivering the $10 billion in market-based agriculture disaster assistance, and continues working with the Secretary to advance the $21 billion in weather-related assistance. Secretary Rollins indicated that USDA’s application process for the weather-based ag aid will open in the coming weeks.
“We have to make sure we’re getting it done for our farmers and our ranchers every single day. We want to work together to find savings, but we have to know that we’re still going to deliver the service that keeps our family farms and ranches going, to the benefit of every single American,” said Hoeven. “We appreciate Secretary Rollins making it a priority to fully-staff and keep open FSA offices. These front-line FSA officers are the ones who work directly with our farmers and ranchers and help provide the service they deserve.
“We secured $33.5 billion to help our producers with challenges, whether it’s markets, whether it’s prices, and certainly always the weather – none of which they control. Secretary Rollins worked to get out the $10 billion in market-based disaster agriculture aid within 90 days, with North Dakota producers having already received about half a billion dollars from that tranche. We want to continue working together to implement the $21 billion weather-based assistance and we appreciate USDA’s commitment to begin that process in the coming weeks,” the senator said.
Source: United States Senator for Idaho James E Risch
WASHINGTON – U.S. Senators Jim Risch (R-Idaho) and Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.) today introduced the Small Business Disaster Coordination Act to improve on the ground support for small businesses affected by disasters.
This bill would allow Small Business Administration (SBA) resource partners to assist businesses outside their usual service areas in an emergency. The Small Business Disaster Coordination Act would also require the SBA to work with these partners on disaster planning and response, ensuring local networks can share recovery-related information.
“From catastrophic wildfires to disastrous flooding, SBA resource partners stand ready to assist small businesses in times of emergency,” said Risch. “By expanding opportunities for these partners to help through my Small Business Disaster Coordination Act, we can ensure that the small businesses vital to our communities and economy stick around for years to come.”
“Wherever disasters strike, it has to be all-hands-on-deck,” said Cantwell. “This bill will ensure SBA partners such as Small Business Development Centers, SCORE, and Women’s Business Centers can work with local partners to assist small businesses as they recover.”
Risch and Cantwell are joined by U.S. Senators Mike Crapo (R-Idaho), Gary Peters (D-Mich.), and Michael Bennett (D-Colo.) in introducing the legislation.
The Small Business Disaster Coordination Act has received support from America’s Small Business Development Centers (SBDCs), SCORE, and the Association of Women’s Business Centers.
Source: United States Senator for Delaware Christopher Coons
WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Chris Coons (D-Del.) questioned FBI Director Kash Patel at a Senate Appropriations Committee hearing today, where he confronted Patel about the circumstances behind seemingly politically-motivated firings and whether the FBI had taken disciplinary actions against FBI agents who worked on cases against January 6th insurrectionists.
During his Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing earlier this year, Patel pledged that his tenure as director would be forward-looking and that there would be no political retribution for FBI agents who worked on the investigation into the January 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol. Just weeks after Patel’s confirmation, however, former head of the FBI’s New York office James Dennehy was essentially forced out of the agency after he refused a request from the Trump administration to turn in the names of all agents who worked on Capitol riot cases. Several other officials at the Department of Justice have also been dismissed because their connections to January 6th investigations.
Senator Coons also asked Patel about a response to a letter from Senate Judiciary Democrats earlier this year to then-Acting FBI Director Brian Driscoll over alleged purges within the Justice Department and FBI that targeted career prosecutors and agents involved in January 6thinvestigations.
Patel was testifying before the Senate today on the White House’s 2026 budget proposal that calls for a funding cut of more than $500 million for the FBI.
A video of Senator Coons’ full questioning and partial transcript of his comments are available below.
WATCH HERE.
Senator Coons: You’ve also testified just yesterday in front of House Appropriations that you are orienting the FBI looking forward—there won’t be any actions against FBI agents based on what they did in terms of carrying out assignments to investigate January 6 incidents. During your confirmation, you said there will be no retribution taken by the FBI should you be confirmed as director.
James Dennehy, who was head of the New York Field Office, has been forced out, received no reason for his removal, but had resisted efforts to turn over a list of agents involved in January 6 investigations. That’s how I’ve understood the characterization of his separation, and that sounds to me like politicization and retribution for involvement in January 6. I just want to hear your statement about where you see any disciplinary actions related to January 6 investigations.
Patel: Thank you, Senator. With the ongoing litigation related to the specific list, there’s only so much I can talk about, but I can tell you this with affirmation: no one on any list will be punished at the FBI. As someone who was given case assignments I didn’t want many times over, you don’t get punished for your case assignments. You only get punished if you didn’t do the job and fail to follow the ethical guidelines and break the law, and that’s the standard.
Senator Coons: The Judiciary Committee recently had two career prosecutors in front of them who were dismissed explicitly for their involvement in prosecuting January 6 cases—I understand that’s not the FBI. I hope to work with you on ensuring that we orient the FBI forward. In February, I did join all my judiciary colleagues to send then-Acting Director Driscoll letters about proposed purges of agents for simply carrying out their assignments. Do you know if you’ve answered that letter?
Patel: I’ll have to check, Senator. Sorry.
Senator Coons: I’ll tell you that I haven’t received a response, and I expect a response. More importantly, I expect a budget and an appropriations request so we can do our job as the relevant appropriations subcommittee.
Source: United States Senator John Hickenlooper – Colorado
The Stop Comstock Act would repeal an 1873 law that could be misused to limit abortion access nationwide
WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator John Hickenlooper joined Tina Smith and 25 of their Senate colleagues to introduce the Stop Comstock Act to protect access to medication abortions like Mifepristone. Specifically, the legislation would repeal the outdated Comstock Act of 1873, which anti-choice extremists have threatened to invoke to effectively end access to medication abortion without a single act of Congress.
“Extreme Republicans and dust-covered laws from 1873 have no business dictating a woman’s right to make her own health care decisions,” Hickenlooper said. “We’re fighting to take those arcane laws off the books and protect reproductive health care nationwide.”
The Stop Comstock Act would repeal language in the Comstock Laws that could be used to ban the mailing of mifepristone and other drugs used in medication abortions, instruments and equipment used in abortions, and educational material related to sexual health. Medication abortion is the most common form of abortion care in the U.S.
The legislation has been endorsed by the Planned Parenthood Federation of America, the American Civil Liberties Union, the Center for Reproductive Rights, National Women’s Law Center, Reproductive Freedom for All (formerly NARAL Pro-Choice America), Take Back the Court Action Fund, Healthcare Across Borders, Expanding Medication Abortion Access (EMAA).
A summary of the bill is available HERE. The text of the bill is available HERE.
Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Hakeem Jeffries (8th District of New York)
Washington, D.C. – Today, Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries held a press conference where he emphasized that while Rubber Stamp Republicans try to jam through their reckless budget, House Democrats will continue to push back against the scheme to enact the largest cut to Medicaid and food assistance in American history.
LEADER JEFFRIES: Good morning, everyone. The economy is collapsing. The Trump tariffs are raising costs on hardworking American taxpayers. Small businesses are closing. Businesses and corporations are unable to invest and hire people. And Republicans are driving us toward a painful recession. Donald Trump and House Republicans promised the American people last year that they were going to lower costs on day one. But costs aren’t going down, they’re going up. Inflation is going up, and life is getting more expensive in the United States of America. The House Republican majority has been a complete and utter failure. They’ve now had the opportunity to govern for 125 days and we haven’t seen a single bill that actually has moved to the Floor that is designed to make life more affordable.
Instead, what House Republicans are doing is trying to jam this extreme budget down the throats of the American people that would visit the largest cut to healthcare in American history, and at the same time take food out of the mouths of children, veterans and families in order to pay for a massive tax cut for their billionaire donors like Elon Musk. It’s totally and completely unacceptable. And House Democrats will continue to strongly oppose it today, tomorrow, this week, next week and as long as it takes until we can bury this extreme budget in the ground, never to rise again.
Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Mike Johnson (LA-04)
House Votes to Codify President Trump’s Gulf of America Executive Order
Washington, May 8, 2025
WASHINGTON — Speaker Johnson released the following statement after the House passed H.R.276, the Gulf of America Act.
“President Trump’s America First agenda puts our country first in every way. Today, the House voted to permanently rename the Gulf of Mexico as the Gulf of America. I want to thank Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene for leading the charge on this legislation. This is one of the many steps House Republicans are taking to codify President Trump’s agenda into law, and there is much more to come.”
Source: United States Senator Peter Welch (D-Vermont)
WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senator Peter Welch (D-Vt.) released the following statement on the election of Cardinal Robert Prevost—now Pope Leo XIV—as the new Pope. Pope Leo XIV is the first American pope:
“This is an exciting and historic moment for the Church, and also for America. Pope Leo XIV has dedicated his life to helping the poor and to social justice. I am hopeful he will continue the values of Pope Francis.”
Source: United States Senator Pete Ricketts (Nebraska)
May 8, 2025
WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senator Pete Ricketts (R-NE), released the following statement after Cardinal Robert Francis Prevost was elected Pope:
“I am amazed by this historic moment to witness the first ever American Pope. I pray for the Holy Father Leo XIV and look forward to a long-lasting pontificate.”
WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Sens. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), Ted Budd (R-N.C.), and Tim Sheehy (R-Mont.) introduced theAuthorizing Vocational and Instructional Aviation Training for Eligible Veterans Act to allow eligible veterans to use their Veteran Readiness and Employment (VR&E) benefits for non-degree flight training programs expanding opportunities for veterans pursuing commercial aviation careers.
Sen. Cruz said, “One of the biggest challenges I hear about from veterans in Texas is finding meaningful employment after retiring from active-duty military service. This legislation empowers those who have defended our country by enabling them to pursue commercial aviation careers.”
Sen. Sheehy said, “As a former Navy SEAL and aviator who created many successful aviation careers for veterans at the aerial firefighting business we started, I’m proud to support veterans getting the training they need to thrive. Veterans know how to work as a team and accomplish the mission, and this bill will help us fill critical aviation workforce shortages and equip veterans with skills needed to prosper in good-paying careers.”
Companion legislation was introduced in the House by Rep Jay Obernolte (R-Calif.-23).
Read the full text of the bill here.
BACKGROUND
Current law prohibits using VR&E benefits for flight training unless offered through a degree-granting institution. This restriction limits opportunities for veterans who wish to pursue aviation careers through FAA-certified flight schools that do not offer traditional degree programs.
The AVIATE act will:
Authorize the VA Secretary to approve non-degree flight training programs under the VR&E program.
Provide parity between Chapter 31 (VR&E) and Chapter 33 (Post-9/11 GI Bill) for aviation training.
Expand access to FAA-certified flight schools not affiliated with degree-granting institutions.
Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative James E (Jim) Clyburn (6th District of South Carolina)
WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Congressman James Clyburn (S.C.-06), Chair of the Democratic Faith Working Group, released the following statement via X on Pope Leo XIV, the first American Pope.
“We celebrate the first American Pope—an extraordinary milestone in the life of the Catholic Church.
“May Pope Leo XIV be guided by humility, courage, and a heart for justice as he steps into this sacred calling. Our prayers are with him and with all those he is called to serve.”
The federal budget deficit totaled $1.1 trillion in the first seven months of fiscal year 2025, the Congressional Budget Office estimates. That amount is $196 billion more than the deficit recorded during the same period last fiscal year. Revenues increased by $146 billion (or 5 percent), and outlays rose by $342 billion (or 9 percent).
The change in the deficit was influenced by the timing of outlays, which decreased the deficit during the first seven months of fiscal year 2024. Outlays in fiscal year 2024 were reduced by shifts in the timing of payments that were due on October 1, 2023, a Sunday. (The payments were made that September.) If not for those shifts, the deficit so far this fiscal year would have been $123 billion more than the shortfall at this point last year. In addition, part of the deficit increase in 2025 arises from the postponement of some tax deadlines from 2023 to 2024 (described below), which boosted receipts in 2024.
In January 2025, CBO projected a deficit of $1.9 trillion for fiscal year 2025, the same as the actual deficit for fiscal year 2024.
The statutory debt limit was reinstated on January 2, 2025, and set at $36.1 trillion, matching the amount of total debt that was outstanding on the prior day. On January 21, 2025, the Department of the Treasury announced a “debt issuance suspension period” and began taking “extraordinary measures” to continue financing government operations without breaching the debt limit. CBO estimates that if the debt limit remains unchanged, the government’s ability to borrow using extraordinary measures will probably be exhausted in August or September 2025.
On May 3, the Carole and Ray Neag Comprehensive Cancer Center, at UConn Health in partnership with our generous sponsors Bristol Myers Squibb, Hartford Foundation for Public Giving, and the Connecticut Health Foundation, hosted a deeply moving and joyful celebration of strength, survival, and community: our long-awaited Cancer Survivors Day event, held at a private gathering during a Hartford Yard Goats game. After several years on hold due to the COVID-19 pandemic, this beloved tradition returned, bigger, brighter, and more meaningful than ever.
And just as if nature knew how special the evening was, a breathtaking double rainbow stretched across the sky, delighting attendees and symbolizing the hope and resilience that defines the cancer journey.
“There’s a saying that after every storm, comes a rainbow. During the event, our patients and families were gifted with a double rainbow! Our patients are truly an inspiration, and it’s an honor to be part of their journey,” said Dr. Sarah Loschiavo, Nursing Director, Cancer Survivorship Program in the NEAG Cancer Center.
Why This Celebration Matters
At UConn Health a person is considered a cancer survivor from the moment of diagnosis. Every step of their journey, through treatment, healing, and beyond is marked by courage, hardship, and hope. This year’s event reminded survivors that they do not walk that path alone. It was a powerful opportunity for reflection, connection, and joy among patients, caregivers, loved ones, and the UConn Health team who care so deeply for them.
For many, this was the first time gathering in such a large crowd in years due to both the emotional toll and immune challenges of treatment. “For me, the game was the biggest outdoor event I’ve been to in the past seven months,” one survivor shared. “I was too weak or afraid to go out. I loved seeing Dr. Tannenbaum and Dr. Soto there, it meant so much to me.”
This celebration offered more than just a fun night at the ballpark. It was a declaration of life, a reminder that community is healing, and a moment to say: you matter, and we honor you.
Moments of Inspiration
Throughout the evening, survivors shared moving stories that left a lasting impact:
A patient with gynecologic cancer proudly pointed to her full head of hair. “I used the DigniCap scalp cooling system and followed every guideline. I even worked full-time during treatment—and none of my coworkers knew. That was important to me.” At UConn Health, DigniCap is offered at no cost to all eligible patients, a powerful tool for maintaining dignity during a vulnerable time.
Another attendee, a breast cancer survivor, arrived with a mission: “I need to find Dr. Tannenbaum. I was one of her first patients—21 years ago! If it wasn’t for her, I wouldn’t be here enjoying this event with my granddaughter.” The reunion between doctor and patient was emotional, joyful, and a testament to long-term survivorship.
Patients Cheryl Hill and Angela Sullivan pose with Dr. Susan Tannenbaum and the UConn Husky mascot
One survivor reflected on the personal journey of healing and reclaiming life: “I’m retiring this year and taking back my life! Like the commercial says, ‘Cancer will not define me.’ I feel like I’m regaining control again.”
“I put my life in the hands of strangers at first, not knowing what was going to happen. My life was turned upside down from this disease. But Dr. Tannenbaum, Dr. Soto, Jennifer Stapell RN, Ellen Morris-White APRN, and the amazing nurses in the Infusion Center, Nadine, Kirsten, and so many more, they are my lifesavers. They are the BEST. I owe my life to them,” said Angela Sullivan.
“We are honored to walk beside our patients on the hardest days, and the most joyful ones. This year’s Survivors Day reminded us that healing is not only found in medicine, but in togetherness, laughter, and celebration. It’s about community. It’s about hope,” said Loschiavo.
And sometimes, when the timing is just right, it’s about a double rainbow breaking through the clouds.
The Class of 2025 is just days away from walking across the commencement stage to receive their Doctor of Dental Medicine degrees.
This week, the students gathered with their fellow classmates and faculty to celebrate their many accomplishments for one last time before UConn Health’s 54th Commencement on May 12.
The annual senior awards celebration—this year taking place at the New Britain Museum of American Art—includes the presentation of student and faculty awards.
Faculty and students in the Class of 2025 gather for the annual School of Dental Medicine senior awards ceremony.
“On behalf of the entire School of Dental Medicine community, I congratulate each of our soon-to-be new graduates for completing arguably the most challenging and rigorous dental programs anywhere,” said Dr. Steven Lepowsky, dean of the School of Dental Medicine. “In doing so, we are confident that you are well prepared to enter the profession as exceptionally well trained and competent beginning practitioners. You are well poised to face the challenges of the next phase of your professional careers.”
The dean continued, “Your professional journey does not end with graduation. The majority of you will be entering residency programs in a few weeks, while others will be entering practice, but regardless of that next step, I want to encourage you to continue to learn and grow with the same enthusiasm and spirit that you have demonstrated with us over the past four years.”
Students in the Class of 2025 gather for the annual School of Dental Medicine senior awards ceremony.
“It was an honor to attend the student awards reception,” said David Cruzate, the class representative. “The night of camaraderie with our friends, colleagues, and faculty felt like such a culmination and celebration of our time here at UConn. I am forever grateful to be a part of our community!”
After commencement, Cruzate will be heading to Togus Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Augusta, Maine for his Advanced Education in General Dentistry residency.
Cynara McPhail, president of the School of Dental Medicine Alumni Association Board and 1984 graduate of the School of Dental Medicine, made remarks to the students as well.
Earlier in the week, the School of Dental Medicine hosted an induction ceremony for the Phi Chi Chapter of the prestigious Omicron Kappa Upsilon (OKU) National Dental Honor society.
Samira Abdelrehim, Dedrian Barrett, Emma Bergstrom, Sierra Furey, Dani Gosselin, and Michael Truhlar were inducted for their outstanding achievements in scholarship, professionalism, and ethics.
“Induction into OKU is based on scholarship and character, and is a great honor in dental medicine,” said Dr. Donna Paolella, associate dean for admissions and president of the Phi Chi chapter. “The faculty and students inducted this year are very impressive, and this is a well-deserved honor.”
Phi Chi Chapter of the OKU National Dental Honor Society student and faculty inductees.
Dr. Eric Bernstein, associate dean for academic affairs, and Dr. Takanori Sobue, associate professor in the Department of Periodontology, were inducted as faculty.
During the student awards recognition ceremony, Dr. Ellen Eisenberg was announced as this year’s Kaiser Permanente award winner for excellence in teaching and Dr. Hang Le received the South Park Inn Award for outstanding service to the community.
The full list of the student awards is below:
ENDODONTICS
American Association of Endodontists Student Achievement Award Olivia Dort
GENERAL DENTISTRY
Academy of General Dentistry Future Leader in General Dentistry Award Mark DiRusso
Academy of Operative Dentistry Award Cristal Bruce
American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry Student Award of Merit Emma Bergstrom
The Quintessence Award for Clinical Achievement in Restorative Dentistry Gosia Fryc
ORAL MEDICINE
American Academy of Oral Medicine Award Danielle Gosselin
American Academy of Orofacial Pain Award Lucy Schlink
ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL PATHOLOGY
American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology Dental Student Award Samira Abdelrehim
ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY
Allan B. Reiskin Award Kipa Shakya
American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology Award Gosia Fryc
ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY
American Academy of Implant Dentistry Student Award Dedrian Barrett
American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons Dental Student Award Spencer Infranco
American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons Dental Implant Award Mark DiRusso
American College of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons Award (William H. Bell Award) Isiah Sumler
Academy of Osseointegration Outstanding Dental Student in Implant Dentistry Tyler Deitelbaum
Connecticut Society of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons Award John Todd
Dr. Richard G. Topazian Prize Juan Mitchell
Horace Wells Senior Student Award from the American Dental Society of Anesthesiology Pablo Piedra
International Congress of Oral Implantologists/Dentsply Student Achievement Award Brian Legato
ORTHODONTICS
American Association of Orthodontists Award Thomas Nelson
Dr. Surender Nanda Memorial Award Peter Schwalm
PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY
American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry Certificate of Merit Samantha DePalma
Special Care Dentistry Association/Academy of Dentistry for Persons with Disabilities Award Sierra Furey
PERIODONTOLOGY
American Academy of Periodontology Award Dedrian Barrett
Northeastern Society of Periodontists Award Pritisha Amatya
The Quintessence Award for Clinical Achievement in Periodontics Timothy Tsai
PROSTHODONTICS
American College of Prosthodontists Achievement Award Michael Truhlar
American Prosthodontic Society Award Sarah Nevolis
HanauTM Best of the Best Prosthodontic Award Gosia Fryc
Kohrman Award Dedrian Barrett
SENIOR AWARDS COMMITTEE AWARDS
American Association of Public Health Dentistry Samantha DePalma
Dr. Robert G. Levine Award Julia Clapis
The Dr. Loeb Prize Samira Abdelrehim
Friends of the School of Dental Medicine – Fox Award Dedrian Barrett
International College of Dentists Student Humanitarian Award Nina Penabad
International College of Dentists Student Leadership Award Eddyson Altidor
Society for Color and Appearance in Dentistry (SCAD) Richard Cadena
The Brian D. Stone Student Memorial Award Jake Wallach
The Pierre Fauchard Academy Award Jason Deck
The Quintessence Award for Research Achievement Emma Winchester
University of Connecticut School of Dental Medicine Professional Development Award John Dellalana
American Association of Women Dentists Eleanor J. Bushee Senior Dental Student Award Megna Senthilnathan
Olmstead Prize in Geriatrics Ninad Vora
Academic Achievement Award 2025 Sponsored by the Provost’s Commission on the Status of Women, the UConn Alumni Association, and the Women’s Center Samira Abdelrehim
ADEA Dr. Jean Craig Sinkford Student Leadership Award Dedrian Barrett
US Public Health Service Dental Award Serene Elbach
2025 ASDA Award of Excellence Sarah Nevolis
Commencement Speaker Kristina Dubois
The Alumni Relations Award Victoria D’Agostino Eddyson Altidor Mychael Mckeever
Health Careers Bridge Award Nina Penabad
Phi Chi Chapter of Omicron Kappa Upsilon 2025 Inductees Samira Abdelrehim Dedrian Barrett Emma Bergstrom Sierra Furey Danielle Gosselin Michael Truhlar
The South Park Inn Dental Clinic Award Vanessa Vlaun Dr. Hang Le
Kaiser Permanente Teaching Award Dr. Ellen Eisenberg