Category: Asia Pacific

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: NHRC takes suo motu cognizance of the reported death of a chartered accountant girl from Kerala in Pune due to excessive workload in her company

    Source: Government of India (2)

    NHRC takes suo motu cognizance of the reported death of a chartered accountant girl from Kerala in Pune due to excessive workload in her company

    Expressing serious concern over the incident NHRC emphasizes businesses should be sensitive to and accountable for human rights issues

    Calls Businesses for reviewing their work culture, employment policies and regulations to ensure alignment with global human rights standards

    Issues a notice to the Ministry of Labour and Employment calling for a report within four weeks

    The Report is expected to include the steps being and proposed to be taken to ensure such incidents do not recur

    Posted On: 21 SEP 2024 7:18PM by PIB Delhi

    The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), India has taken suo motu cognizance of media reports that a 26-year-old chartered accountant girl from Kerala died in Pune, Maharashtra on 20th July 2024, allegedly, due to excessive workload in the Ernst & Young that she joined four months back. Reportedly, the mother has written a letter to the employer claiming that long hours of work had taken a heavy toll on her daughter’s physical, emotional and mental health, a charge denied by the company. The Union Ministry of Labour and Employment is getting the matter investigated.

    The Commission has observed that the contents of the media reports, if true, raise serious issues regarding challenges faced young citizens at work, suffering from mental stress, anxiety, and lack of sleep, adversely affecting their physical and mental health while chasing impractical targets and timelines resulting in grave violations of their human rights. It is the prime duty of every employer to provide a safe, secure and positive environment to its employees. They must ensure that everyone working with them is treated with dignity and fairness.

    The Commission has further emphasized that businesses should take accountability for human rights issues and regularly update and revise their work and employment policies and regulations to ensure alignment with global human rights standards. The painful death of the young employee in the instant case has indicated that there is an immediate need to take steps by all the stakeholders in this regard to stop such incidents in the country.

    Accordingly, it has issued a notice to the Union Ministry of Labour and Employment, calling for a detailed report in the matter. The Commission would also like to know the outcome of the investigation, reportedly, being conducted in the instant matter relating to the death of the young employee. Apart from this, the Commission would also like to know the steps being taken and proposed to be taken to ensure such incidents do not recur. The response is expected within four weeks.

    According to the media report, carried on 18th September, 2024, the mother of the deceased girl has claimed that her daughter’s death is reflective of the larger work culture, which glorifies hard work but at the cost of health. She has reportedly stated that how can a company that speaks of values and human rights fail even to show up for the funeral of one of its own employees.

    It may be recalled that recently, the Commission took suo motu cognizance of the media reports regarding alleged unfair practices at the workplace by two multinational companies in the States of Haryana and Tamil Nadu. Both matters are under consideration before the Commission. Apart from this, the Commission at various platforms has been insisting businesses integrate human rights protection, safety and security especially of women into their organizational culture to operate sustainably and extend these principles to formulate policies in such a manner that a healthy work environment is created for the welfare of the workers.

    Last year, the Commission organized a conference on ‘harmonizing human rights and climate issues in businesses’ to sensitize various stakeholders especially business and industry on human rights. The Commission has also appointed a ‘Special Monitor’ to look into various practices and work environment leading to violations of human rights in business. The Commission has specifically constituted a ‘Core Group on Business and Human Rights’ to review the existing legislations and regulations relating to the business environment and human rights and suggest measures for improvement. Based on these inputs, the Commission intends to firm up its recommendations and send the same to the Central and State governments and their agencies to ensure protection of human rights and healthy work environment in business and industry.

    ***

    NSK

    (Release ID: 2057381) Visitor Counter : 22

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: Vice-President cautions against playing politics in matters of development

    Source: Government of India (2)

    The Vice-President, Shri Jagdeep Dhankhar today appealed to not fall prey to politics 24 hours a day. “Politics cannot be above the nation. There should be no politics in matters of development. We cannot be the victim of excessive politics at the cost of nationalism, progress of the nation and development”, he remarked.

    Addressing the gathering at the Public Function at Dokmardi Auditorium, Dadra & Nagar Haveli and Daman & Diu, Shri Dhankhhar underscored the importance of upholding the dignity and pride of the nation when representing India abroad. He remarked “No one has the right to go outside India and speak ill of India, sit with the enemies of India. Whenever we go outside the country, we are the ambassadors of the country, we cannot think of anything other than nationalism”. 

    Voicing concern over the increasing trend of individuals tarnishing India’s image while abroad, he remarked, “Today, we see medical tourism and safari tourism flourishing, but why is anti-national tourism happening? If we go abroad and speak ill of our country, this is unacceptable. Such behaviour not only harms the nation but also undermines our collective identity”.

    Citing the exemplary conduct of former Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee, the Vice President pointed to a time when Vajpayee, though leader of the opposition, led India’s delegation abroad while the Congress government was in power. “Atalji’s actions were guided by a single goal—‘My India is great, my India, my nationalism,’” the Vice President added.

    Emphasizing the need for continuous improvement across all sectors, Shri Dhankhar stated that “There is scope for growth in everything. Every day, we see that whatever we do today, we can do better tomorrow.” He acknowledged the vital role technology plays in advancing the nation’s progress but cautioned against actions that compromise the health of the country and its people. “Destroying the health of India is no less than stabbing a knife in the chest of Mother India, and this will not be tolerated under any circumstances,” he declared.

    Questioning the growing trend of importing items that can be produced locally, he stated, “Why do we use foreign goods for monetary gains? Will furniture come from abroad in our country? Will bottles come from abroad? Even kites, diyas, candles, and cotton are now coming from abroad.”

    He highlighted three major disadvantages of this practice: the depletion of foreign exchange, the loss of domestic tax revenues, and the missed opportunities for Indian entrepreneurs who are being deprived of the chance to grow and thrive, and lamented the fact that such reliance on imported goods, driven by short-term economic gains, ultimately harms the nation’s long-term prosperity.

    Reflecting on India’s incredible journey toward equality and social mobility, Shi Dhankhar celebrated the country’s success in empowering individuals from diverse backgrounds to rise to the highest positions of leadership.

    “How did a tea seller become the Prime Minister of India despite poverty? How did a farmer’s son become the Vice President? How did a woman from a tribal background become the President of the country?”, he remarked.

    Recalling his visit to Jammu and Kashmir as a minister in 1990, he noted the stark difference between then and now. “At that time, I did not see 30 people during my visit, and this year, 2 crore tourists have visited Jammu and Kashmir,” he remarked, underscoring the region’s significant resurgence as a major tourist destination.

    Shri Dhankar also praised the growth and development of India’s agricultural sector, citing the government’s initiatives aimed at empowering farmers. “Today, 10 crore farmers receive payments directly, thrice a year”.

    Shri Praful Patel, Hon’ble Administrator, UT of DNH&DD and Lakshadeep, Smt. DelkarKalabenMohanbhai, Hon’ble MP, DNH and other dignitaries were also present on the occasion.

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: Department of Telecommunication (DoT) is observing Swachhata Hi Seva (SHS)- 2024 campaign

    Source: Government of India

    Posted On: 21 SEP 2024 6:27PM by PIB Delhi

    Department of Telecommunication (DoT) is observing Swachhata Hi Seva (SHS)- 2024 campaign from 17.09.2024 to 02.10.2024 in its organisations/ PSUs across the country. The campaign celebrates the 10th Anniversary of Swachh Bharat Mission. The campaign encourages Jan Bhaagidari urging citizens to participate in the nation’s cleanliness efforts and also to recognise the important role of SafaiMitras (sanitation workers).  SafaiMitra Suraksha Shivirs, to recognize the role of sanitation workers and also promote their welfare, are being held in organizations/ PSUs pan India. A SafaiMitra Suraksha Shivir was held today in DoT HQ at Sanchar Bhavan, New Delhi which was inaugurated by Shri S. Balachandra Iyer, DDG(C&A). Health check up of about 100 sanitation workers & their wards took place and they were also made aware of the importance of hygiene.

     

     

    ******

    SB/DP

    (Release ID: 2057365) Visitor Counter : 55

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: Union Minister for Road Transport and Highways Shri Nitin Gadkari lays the foundation stone for two National Highway projects in Pune, Maharashtra

    Source: Government of India (2)

    Union Minister for Road Transport and Highways Shri Nitin Gadkari lays the foundation stone for two National Highway projects in Pune, Maharashtra

    4-laning of existing 2-lane stretch from Dive Ghat to Hadapsar Section (KM 220.900 to KM 234.150 i.e 13.25Km) of Mohol -Alandi on NH-965 (Palkhi Marg Packg-VI) in Pune District  

    (Total Project Cost Rs.  819 Cr.)

    Construction of Major Bridges on Mula & Mutha Bridge on Pune Satara Section of NH-48

    (Total Project Cost Rs. 80 Cr.)

    Posted On: 21 SEP 2024 6:55PM by PIB Delhi

    Union Minister for Road Transport and Highways Shri Nitin Gadkari laid the foundation stone for two National Highway projects in Pune, Maharashtra in presence of Sh. Devendra Fadanvis, Deputy Chief Minister, Government of Maharashtra and Sh. Murlidhar Mohol, Minister of State for Civil Aviation and Minister of State for Co-operation, Govt. of India.

    These include the four-laning of a 13 km stretch from Dive Ghat to Hadapsar on the Mohol-Alandi section of NH-965 (Palkhi Marg Package VI) and the construction of major bridges on the Mula-Mutha River along with service roads from Sinhagad Road to Warje on the Pune-Satara section of NH-48.

    Addressing the gathering on this occasion, Sh. Nitin Gadkari said that the widening and upgradation of Hadapsar to duve Ghat section of NH-965 is going to play major role in reducing congestion on this section. It will also help the devotees for a safe and pleasant journey in Palkhi Yatra. The resting places will be developed along the palkhi margs through MSIDC, he added.

    He said that the construction of Major bridges along the Mula and Mutha river, widening of service road from Narhe to navale bridge and further connectivity from sinhagad road to warje will reduce the traffic congestion in these areas.

    He said that NHAI has also invited the tender for elevated corridor in Nashik Phata Khed section of NH60, the project worth Rs. 7500 Cr.

    Further, the DPR has been completed for the development of Ravet to Narhe elevated corridor, the project worth Rs. 5000 Cr. The project will be started in December-2024, he stated during the address. He informed that Elevated Corridors of Talegaon Chakan Shikrapur section of Nh-548D and Pune-Shirur section of NH-753F will be developed by MSIDC. The DPR for New Mumbai -Bangalore expressway has been planned to connect two cities and to reduce the travel time from Mumbai, Pune and Bangalore, he further added.

    These projects aim to enhance connectivity between Pune, Satara, and Solapur, providing a smoother journey for devotees travelling to the sacred temple of Lord Vitthal. Additionally, the stretches will facilitate faster travel, alleviate traffic congestion, and boost local economies.

    The project is going to benefit: –

    • Connecting Devotees across the Nation and beyond to “Lord Vitthal”.
    • Dedicated Walkway for “Palkhi” on either side of NH.
    • Hassle free and safe passage for “Devotees”.
    • Relief from traffic congestion on entire stretch leading to saving of time & fuel.
    • Agricultural produce and local products to get easy access to bigger market. 
    • Nearly 9-10 Lakh Warkaris take part in the Palkhi Yatra procession
    • Will reduce the accidents in Pune Satara and Solapur district.
    • Will reduce traffic congestion in urban areas of Pune.

    The inauguration event was attended by Sh. Chandrakant Dada Patil, Minister of Higher and Technical Education, Textile Parliamentary Affairs, Smt. Supriya Sule, MP Baramati, Divisional Commissioner.

    *****

    NB/GS

    (Release ID: 2057375) Visitor Counter : 84

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-OSI Economics: Breaking the Mold: Women in Wind 2024​

    Source: Global Wind Energy Council – GWEC

    Headline: Breaking the Mold: Women in Wind 2024​

    Suzlon Group is among the world’s leading renewable energy solutions provider that is revolutionising and redefining the way sustainable energy sources are harnessed across the world. Presence in 17 countries across Asia, Australia, Europe, Africa and the Americas, Suzlon is powering a greener tomorrow with its strong competencies in renewable energy systems. Suzlon’s extensive range of robust and reliable products backed by its cutting-edge R&D and more than two decades of expertise are designed to ensure optimum performance, higher yields and maximum return on investment for the customers.

    Sustainable development is the creed that underpins Suzlon’s bespoke initiatives to protect the environment, strengthen communities and propel responsible growth. Suzlon is headquartered at One Earth – Pune, which is a Platinum LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environment Design) certified and GRIHA 5 star rated campus and is also among the greenest corporate campuses in the world.

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: Alice Mak joins visit to GZ barracks

    Source: Hong Kong Information Services

    Secretary for Home & Youth Affairs Alice Mak today travelled to Guangzhou, where she participated in a visit to military barracks by youths from Hong Kong and Macau.

     

    The visit was aimed at promoting national defence education among youths from Hong Kong and Macau, and enhancing their awareness of national security, thereby strengthening their affection for and sense of belonging to the country. About 500 youths from the two places took part in the event, during which they were shown military equipment and barrack dormitories.

     

    Stressing that national security is the foundation for prosperity and stability in society, and of people’s well-being, Miss Mak said in an address that today’s visit offered an opportunity for youngsters from Hong Kong and Macau to gain an in-depth understanding of the importance of national defence education and national security.

     

    She added that the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government, attaching great importance to encouraging patriotism and national pride among Hong Kong youths, supports them to take advantage of the opportunities brought by the country’s key strategies and integrate into its overall development.

     

    Miss Mak said she encouraged youths from Hong Kong and Macau to equip themselves and contribute to the development of both places, and of the country.

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: DFS Secretary Shri M. Nagaraju chairs Conference of Chairpersons of Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunals (DRATs) and Presiding Officers of Debt Recovery of Tribunals (DRTs) at New Delhi today

    Source: Government of India

    DFS Secretary Shri M. Nagaraju chairs Conference of Chairpersons of Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunals (DRATs) and Presiding Officers of Debt Recovery of Tribunals (DRTs) at New Delhi today

    Issues related to DRTs, including reducing pendency, adoption of best practices, optimising recovery, formulation of settlement policy, and adoption of new DRT Regulations 2024 were discussed during the conference

    Posted On: 21 SEP 2024 5:33PM by PIB Delhi

    Shri M. Nagaraju, Secretary, Department of Financial Services (DFS) chaired a Conference of Chairpersons of Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunals (DRATs) and Presiding Officers of Debt Recovery of Tribunals (DRTs) at New Delhi, today.

    The meeting was attended by senior officers from the public and private sectors banks, Deputy Chief Executive Officer (CEO), Indian Bank Association (IBA) and senior officers from the Ministry of Finance.

    During the meeting whole gamut of issues were discussed concerning the functioning of DRTs and in order to make recovery procedure more efficient, it was agreed that:

    • Banks to put in place effective monitoring and oversight mechanism for efficient management of pending cases in DRTs
    • Some of the best practices followed in DRTs were also discussed which can be adopted across DRTs for better outcome.
    • Banks to have clearly defined policy for small and high value cases pending in DRTs for optimising the recovery.
    • While formulating settlement policy, banks to take into account the transaction costs in mind while pursuing pending recovery cases.
    • All stakeholders to work collectively to reduce pendency and take effective measures for optimisation of recovery which would help in ploughing back the capital stuck in pending cases to the economy for productive use.
    • DRT Regulations 2024 which have number of improved features over the earlier DRT Regulation 2015 to be adopted by all DRTs with an objective to make the DRT process more effective and less time consuming.

    ****

    NB/KMN

    (Release ID: 2057351) Visitor Counter : 42

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: The Union Minister of Ports, Shipping and Waterways Shri Sarbananda Sonowal Inaugurates ‘Swachhata Hi Sewa’ Campaign from Dibrugarh

    Source: Government of India

    The Union Minister of Ports, Shipping and Waterways Shri Sarbananda Sonowal Inaugurates ‘Swachhata Hi Sewa’ Campaign from Dibrugarh

    “People’s Participation has turned Swacha Bharat Mission into a People’s Movement”: Shri Sarbananda Sonowal

    Shri Sonowal participated in ‘Swachhata Mein Jan Bhagidari’ programme within the Civil Hospital premises

    Shri Sarbananda Sonowal Inaugurates “Safai Mitra Suraksha Shivir” in Chowkidingee – aims to secure and enable the Safai Karmis with social security via Government Welfare Schemes

    Posted On: 21 SEP 2024 5:41PM by PIB Delhi

    The Union Minister of Ports, Shipping & Waterways, Shri Sarbananda Sonowal took active part in programmes organised under ‘Sewa Pakhwada’ campaign of the government here today. Shri Sonowal participated in the cleanliness drive under the ‘Swachhata Mein Jan Bhagidari,’ held at the Civil Hospital of the city, to encourage Safai Karmacharis, the government employees and people in general to engage in regular cleanliness.

    The Union Minister Shri Sarbananda Sonowal, who is also the MP (Lok Sabha) for the Dibrugarh LSC, also inaugurated “Safai Mitra Suraksha Shivir” at the historic Chowkidingee field for the benefit of the Safai Karmacharis working under the various municipal bodies of Dibrugarh, Chabua, Tinsukia, Margherita, Digboi, Makum, Naharkatia, and Namrup. More than 500 Safai Karmacharis attended the programme where Sonowal also interacted with them. Shri Sonowal assured that the Government would take all necessary steps so that they can avail the benefit of the Government welfare schemes and ensure their social security.

    Speaking on the occasion, the Union Minister said, “Swachha Bharat Abhiyaan is the most significant and popular movement which has been successfully going on under the visionary leadership of Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi ji. This movement has been embraced by everyone in this country towards building a stronger and cleaner India. Inspired by Bapu Mahatma Gandhiji’s words, our dynamic leader Narendra Modi ji launched this campaign a decade ago which is still going strong with a resounding response from the common people. This year, during this Sewa Pakhwada, we are celebrating the theme ‘Swachhata Hi Sewa’ as we continue our journey towards a cleaner tomorrow. In this endeavour, the most crucial section of our society is our brothers and sisters who have been working as the Safai Karmacharis. It gives me immense pleasure that we are sitting under one roof today along with more than 500 Safai Karmacharis who are keeping Dibrugarh constituency. I bow before all of you today with complete devotion.”

    Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi launched the ‘Swachh Bharat Mission’ throughout length and breadth of the country as a national movement in 2014. In 2023), under the ‘Ek Tareekh, Ek Ghanta, Ek Saath’ campaign, more than 8.75 crore people simultaneously cleaned 9 lakh sites. Last year, the Swachhata Hi Sewa campaign saw 32 crore people participating with Shramdan by more than 15 crores citizens. Institutional buildings, Garbage vulnerable sites, water bodies, legacy waste sites, river banks & waterfronts, tourist sites, beaches were cleaned. ‘Swachhata ki Bhagidari’ campaign encourages public participation, awareness and advocacy via Swachhata Pledges, Public Workshops, Marathons, Cyclothons, Human Chains, Gram Sabhas, Youth Connect, and Waste to Art events. It is aimed at involving the whole society.

    Adding further, Shri Sarbananda Sonowal said, “A public program transforms into a true people’s movement only when there is genuine involvement. And when there is such a movement, success is inevitable. The Swachh Bharat Abhiyan, initiated by Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi, has evolved into a powerful people’s movement. Cleanliness reflects the perfection of God. Bapuji has shown us the vision of cleanliness. One can inspire many to care for the environment, towards cleanliness. For this, we must change for better and adapt ways of living in conformity with Mother Nature. As the campaign says, we must clean our inner self besides ensuring cleanliness outside. ‘Swabhav Swachhata, Sanskaar Swachhata.’ Is something that we aspire to achieve via this popular movement.”

    With an aim of ‘Sampoorna Swachhata’ including ‘Swachhata Lakshit Ekayi,’ the idea is to identify generally neglected garbage points or any other points which is posing an environmental or health & hygiene risk. Such points once identified will be known as Swachhata Lakshit Ekayi or Cleanliness Target Unit (CTUs). This has already been done and effort is being made to get all the CTUs cleaned up by 1st October. This is targeted transformation. One of the most crucial is the Safai Mitra Suraksha Shivir where we want to help our Safai Mitras and Safai Karmacharis with the help of Preventive Health Checkups & social security coverage. These camps are single window camps for Safai Mitras to improve access to social protection. All the benefits under the Central and State government will be considered for all eligibility. The camps will focus on welfare schemes of Modi govt like PM Awas Yojana (PMAY), AMRUT 2.0, AADHAR, Mission Indradhanush, PM Jan Arogya Yojana (PM JAY), SAUBHAGYA scheme, PM Jan Dhan Yojana, UDYAMi and Ujjwala schemes.

    The Union Minister was accompanied by Rameswar Teli, MP, Rajya Sabha and ex Union Minister of State; Jogen Mahan, Minister, Govt of Assam; Sanjay Kisan, Minister, Govt of Assam; Prasanta Phukan, MLA & Chairman, Assam Industrial Development Corporation (AIDC), Dibrugarh; Binod Hazarika, MLA, Lahowal; Bikul Deka, Chairman, Assam Petrochemicals Limited; Vijay Kumar IAS, Chairman, Inland Waterways Authority of India (IWAI); Bikram Kairi IAS, District Commissioner, Dibrugarh; Dr. Saikat Patra, Mayor, Dibrugarh Municipal Corporation (DMC), among other dignitaries.

    *****

    NB/AK

    (Release ID: 2057355) Visitor Counter : 78

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: Director General David Cheng-Wei Wu Attends Nan Tien Institute’s Graduation Ceremony and Celebrates the 30th Anniversary of Nan Tien Temple

    Source: Republic Of China Taiwan 2

    Director General David Cheng-Wei Wu visited the Most Venerable Hsin Bau, Abbot of Fo Guang Shan, and Venerable Abbess Manko, Chief Abbess of Fo Guang Shan Temples in Australia and New Zealand, to extend his congratulations on the 30th anniversary of Nan Tien Temple’s establishment and its inclusion in the NSW State Heritage Inventory.
    DG Wu, invited by Professor Denise Kirkpatrick, President of Nan Tien Institute, was then joined by VIPs from Taiwan and Australia to witness NTI’s graduation ceremony.
    Aligned with the teachings of Venerable Master Hsing Yun, Nan Tien Temple, integrating charity, education, and culture, has served as an important bridge for cultural exchange between Taiwan and Australia. We look forward to continuing our collaborations with Nan Tien Temple to further strengthen ties between both nations.

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: IOM Chief and COP29 Presidency to Address Climate-Peace-Human Mobility Nexus During UNGA

    Source: International Organization for Migration (IOM)

    New York, 22 September – The COP29 Presidency and the International Organization for Migration (IOM) will co-host a High-Level Roundtable on Climate, Peace, and Human Mobility during the UN General Assembly week on September 22, 2024. With climate change being a major driver of displacement and migration, the event will underscore the urgent need for concrete policy recommendations and practical strategies to address the root causes of climate-induced displacement. 

    The roundtable will focus on the critical intersections of the climate and peace nexus with water scarcity, food insecurity, and land degradation. It aims to catalyze actionable solutions and inform COP29 discussions on key issues related to the climate and peace nexus. 

    “The convergence of climate change and conflict is one of the most pressing challenges of our time, with devastating consequences for some of the most vulnerable people on our planet,” said IOM Director General Amy Pope. “We need to act now to address the root causes of climate-induced displacement and build resilience in affected communities.” 

    The event will also empower a new Centre of Excellence envisaged in the Joint Communique of the COP29 Climate and Peace co-lead initiative to address the gaps in scaling up international cooperation and finance for the most vulnerable, and build synergies between the outcomes of the Summit of the Future and the Peace, Relief and Recovery Day at COP29. 

    “The forthcoming COP29 Peace Relief and Recovery Day in Baku is envisaged to deliver concrete outcomes to scale up support to the countries under multiple stress of climate extremes and conflicts.” said Ambassador Elshad Iskandarov, Senior Adviser to COP29 Presidency, highlighted the importance of international collaboration. “The high-level roundtable is an important milestone on the road to November to provide a crucial platform for governments, UN agencies, and other stakeholders to come together and develop concrete solutions to address the complex challenges represented by the intersection of climate, peace and human mobility. In the face of the climate driven challenges to human security we must work together to ensure a more sustainable, inclusive and peaceful future for all.” 

    The roundtable will feature high-level participants, including representatives from the COP29 Presidency, IOM, the governments of Italy and Egypt, the Green Climate Fund, the Asian Development Bank, the European Investment Bank, the World Bank Group, and the UN Department for Political and Peacebuilding Affairs. 

    The event is expected to produce concrete policy recommendations to inform COP29 discussions and support the launch of the Centre of Excellence on Climate Action for Peace.  

    The Centre will serve as a hub for knowledge exchange, collaboration, and innovation, focusing on solutions to climate-induced displacement and other human security challenges driven by climate extremes, including water scarcity, food insecurity, and land degradation 

     

    Note to Editor:  

     

    The High-Level Roundtable on Climate, Peace, and Human Mobility will take place on September 22, 2024, from 1:15 PM to 2:30 PM in Room 11 at the UN Headquarters in New York.  

     

    About COP29  

    The 29th session of the Conference of the Parties (COP29) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) will be held in Baku, Azerbaijan, from 11-22 November 2024. COP29 will focus on accelerating climate action and delivering on the commitments made under the Paris Agreement.  

     

    For more information, please contact : 
     

    COP29 Presidency: 

    gafgaz.adigozalov@cop29.az or visit www.COP29.az

    IOM:

    Media@iom.int or rsharshr@iom.int 

    MIL OSI United Nations News

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: Secretary-General’s remarks at the Opening Segment of the Summit of the Future Plenary [bilingual, as delivered]

    Source: United Nations secretary general

    Excellencies, 

    Ladies and gentlemen,

    Welcome to the Summit of the Future. 

    I thank the co-facilitators, the former and current Presidents of the General Assembly, and all Member States, for their strong engagement, creativity, and spirit of compromise; and all my colleagues for their invaluable efforts over the past three years. 

    We are here to bring multilateralism back from the brink.

    I called for this Summit to consider deep reforms to make global institutions more legitimate, fair and effective, based on the values of the UN Charter.  

    I called for this Summit because 21st century challenges require 21st century solutions: frameworks that are networked and inclusive; and that draw on the expertise of all of humanity.  

    I called for this summit because our world is heading off the rails – and we need tough decisions to get back on track.  

    Conflicts are raging and multiplying, from the Middle East to Ukraine and Sudan, with no end in sight.

    Our collective security system is threatened by geopolitical divides, nuclear posturing, and the development of new weapons and theatres of war.  

    Resources that could bring opportunities and hope are invested in death and destruction. 

    Huge inequalities are a brake on sustainable development. Many developing countries are drowning in debt and unable to support their people. 

    We have no effective global response to emerging, complex and even existential threats. 
    The climate crisis is destroying lives, devastating communities and ravaging economies. 

    We all know the solution – a just phase-out of fossil fuels – and yet, emissions are still rising. 
    New technologies, including AI, are being developed in a moral and legal vacuum, without governance or guardrails. 

    In short, our multilateral tools and institutions are unable to respond effectively to today’s political, economic, environmental and technological challenges. 

    And tomorrow’s will be even more difficult and even more dangerous.  

    When the United Nations was established nearly 80 years ago, it had 51 Member States. Today there are 193. 

    The global economy was less than one-twelfth of its current size.

    As a result, our peace and security tools and institutions, and our global financial architecture, reflect a bygone era. 

    The United Nations Security Council is outdated, and its authority is eroding.  

    Unless its composition and working methods are reformed, it will eventually lose all credibility.  

    The international financial architecture was established when many of today’s developing countries were under colonial rule. 

    It does not represent the realities of today’s global economy, and it is no longer able to resolve global economic challenges: debt, climate action, sustainable development. 

    It does not provide the global safety net that developing countries need. 

    Meanwhile, technology, geopolitics and globalization have transformed power relations. 

    Our world is going through a time of turbulence and a period of transition. 

    But we cannot wait for perfect conditions. We must take the first decisive steps towards updating and reforming international cooperation to make it more networked, fair and inclusive – now.  

    And today, thanks to your efforts, we have. 

    Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen,

    The Pact for the Future, the Global Digital Compact and the Declaration on Future Generations open pathways to new possibilities and opportunities.

    On peace and security, they promise a breakthrough on reforms to make the Security Council more reflective of today’s world, addressing the historic under-representation of Africa, Asia-Pacific, and Latin America. 

    They lay the foundations for a more agile Peacebuilding Commission, and for a fundamental review of peace operations to make them fit for the conditions they face. 

    They represent the first agreed multilateral support for nuclear disarmament in more than a decade. 

    They recognize the changing nature of conflict, and commit to steps to prevent an arms race in outer space and to govern the use of lethal autonomous weapons.  

    They include measures to mount an immediate and coordinated response to complex global shocks. 

    On sustainable development, these agreements represent major progress towards groundbreaking reforms of the international financial architecture. 

    They will help to make its institutions more representative of today’s world, capable of mounting a stronger response to today’s challenges, and able to provide an effective global safety net for developing countries at a time when many of them are suffocating in debt and unable to make progress on the SDGs. 

    The Pact for the Future is about turbocharging the Sustainable Development Goals and the Paris Agreement, accelerating a just transition away from fossil fuels, and securing a peaceful and livable future for everyone on our planet. 

    It includes a groundbreaking commitment by governments to listen to young people and include them in decision-making, at the national and global levels. 

    And it commits to stronger partnerships with civil society, the private sector, local and regional authorities and more. 

    The Global Digital Compact is based on the principle that technology should benefit everyone.

    It includes the first truly universal agreement on the international governance of Artificial Intelligence.

    It commits governments to establishing an independent international Scientific Panel on AI and initiating a global dialogue on its governance within the United Nations.

    The Global Digital Compact represents the first collective effort to reach agreed interoperability standards – essential for consistent measurement. 

    And it supports networks and partnerships to build capacity on AI in developing countries.  
    The Declaration on Future Generations echoes the call of the United Nations Charter to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war, committing governments for the first time to taking the interests of our descendants into account in decisions we take today. 

    Respect for human rights, cultural diversity and gender equality are woven into all three agreements. 

    In the face of a surge in misogyny and a rollback of women’s reproductive rights, governments have explicitly committed to removing the legal, social and economic barriers that prevent women and girls from fulfilling their potential in every sphere. 

    Excellences, 

    Je salue ces trois accords historiques – qui marquent un tournant vers un multilatéralisme plus efficace, plus inclusif et fonctionnant plus en réseaux. 

    Je me suis battu pour les idées portées par ces accords depuis le tout premier jour de mon mandat. 

    Et je serai pleinement engagé dans leur mise en œuvre jusqu’au tout dernier jour. 

    Nous avons ouvert la porte. 

    Il nous incombe désormais – à toutes et à tous – de la franchir. 

    Car il ne s’agit pas seulement de s’entendre – mais aussi d’agir. 

    Aujourd’hui, je vous mets au défi de passer à l’action. 

    De mettre en œuvre le Pacte pour l’avenir – en privilégiant le dialogue et la négociation, en mettant fin aux guerres qui déchirent le monde, et en réformant la composition et les méthodes de travail du Conseil de sécurité. 

    D’accélérer la réforme du système financier international, notamment à l’occasion de la Conférence sur le financement du développement qui se tiendra l’année prochaine.   

    De placer les nouvelles technologies au service de l’intérêt supérieur de l’humanité. 

    Ce qui détermine notre succès – ou échec, ce n’est pas l’adoption d’accords, mais bien nos actions et leur impact sur la vie des populations que nous servons. 

    Excellences, 

    Tout au long de ma vie – que ce soit en tant que militant politique ou aux Nations Unies – j’ai appris que les gens ne sont jamais d’accord sur le passé. 

    Pour rétablir la confiance, nous devons partir du présent et regarder vers l’avenir. 

    Partout dans le monde, les gens aspirent à la paix, à la dignité et à la prospérité. 

    Ils réclament une mobilisation mondiale pour régler la crise climatique, lutter contre les inégalités et faire face aux risques nouveaux et émergents qui menacent l’humanité. 

    Et ils considèrent que l’ONU est indispensable pour résoudre ces défis. 

    Tout cela a été confirmé pendant les deux Journées d’action inspirantes qui viennent de se dérouler.

    Le Sommet de l’avenir trace la voie pour une coopération internationale qui soit à la hauteur de leurs attentes.   

    Alors que nous franchissons ensemble cette première étape cruciale, je tiens à féliciter tous les États membres pour leur contribution. 

    Maintenant, mettons-nous au travail. 

    Et je vous remercie. 
     

    MIL OSI United Nations News

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: Secretary-General’s remarks at the Opening Segment of the Summit of the Future Plenary [bilingual as delivered, scroll down for all-English and all-French]

    Source: United Nations secretary general

    Excellencies, 

    Ladies and gentlemen,

    Welcome to the Summit of the Future. 

    I thank the co-facilitators, the former and current Presidents of the General Assembly, and all Member States, for their strong engagement, creativity, and spirit of compromise; and all my colleagues for their invaluable efforts over the past three years. 

    We are here to bring multilateralism back from the brink.

    I called for this Summit to consider deep reforms to make global institutions more legitimate, fair and effective, based on the values of the UN Charter.  

    I called for this Summit because 21st century challenges require 21st century solutions: frameworks that are networked and inclusive; and that draw on the expertise of all of humanity.  

    I called for this summit because our world is heading off the rails – and we need tough decisions to get back on track.  

    Conflicts are raging and multiplying, from the Middle East to Ukraine and Sudan, with no end in sight.

    Our collective security system is threatened by geopolitical divides, nuclear posturing, and the development of new weapons and theatres of war.  

    Resources that could bring opportunities and hope are invested in death and destruction. 

    Huge inequalities are a brake on sustainable development. Many developing countries are drowning in debt and unable to support their people. 

    We have no effective global response to emerging, complex and even existential threats. 
    The climate crisis is destroying lives, devastating communities and ravaging economies. 

    We all know the solution – a just phase-out of fossil fuels – and yet, emissions are still rising. 
    New technologies, including AI, are being developed in a moral and legal vacuum, without governance or guardrails. 

    In short, our multilateral tools and institutions are unable to respond effectively to today’s political, economic, environmental and technological challenges. 

    And tomorrow’s will be even more difficult and even more dangerous.  

    When the United Nations was established nearly 80 years ago, it had 51 Member States. Today there are 193. 

    The global economy was less than one-twelfth of its current size.

    As a result, our peace and security tools and institutions, and our global financial architecture, reflect a bygone era. 

    The United Nations Security Council is outdated, and its authority is eroding.  

    Unless its composition and working methods are reformed, it will eventually lose all credibility.  

    The international financial architecture was established when many of today’s developing countries were under colonial rule. 

    It does not represent the realities of today’s global economy, and it is no longer able to resolve global economic challenges: debt, climate action, sustainable development. 

    It does not provide the global safety net that developing countries need. 

    Meanwhile, technology, geopolitics and globalization have transformed power relations. 

    Our world is going through a time of turbulence and a period of transition. 

    But we cannot wait for perfect conditions. We must take the first decisive steps towards updating and reforming international cooperation to make it more networked, fair and inclusive – now.  

    And today, thanks to your efforts, we have. 

    Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen,

    The Pact for the Future, the Global Digital Compact and the Declaration on Future Generations open pathways to new possibilities and opportunities.

    On peace and security, they promise a breakthrough on reforms to make the Security Council more reflective of today’s world, addressing the historic under-representation of Africa, Asia-Pacific, and Latin America. 

    They lay the foundations for a more agile Peacebuilding Commission, and for a fundamental review of peace operations to make them fit for the conditions they face. 

    They represent the first agreed multilateral support for nuclear disarmament in more than a decade. 

    They recognize the changing nature of conflict, and commit to steps to prevent an arms race in outer space and to govern the use of lethal autonomous weapons.  

    They include measures to mount an immediate and coordinated response to complex global shocks. 

    On sustainable development, these agreements represent major progress towards groundbreaking reforms of the international financial architecture. 

    They will help to make its institutions more representative of today’s world, capable of mounting a stronger response to today’s challenges, and able to provide an effective global safety net for developing countries at a time when many of them are suffocating in debt and unable to make progress on the SDGs. 

    The Pact for the Future is about turbocharging the Sustainable Development Goals and the Paris Agreement, accelerating a just transition away from fossil fuels, and securing a peaceful and livable future for everyone on our planet. 

    It includes a groundbreaking commitment by governments to listen to young people and include them in decision-making, at the national and global levels. 

    And it commits to stronger partnerships with civil society, the private sector, local and regional authorities and more. 

    The Global Digital Compact is based on the principle that technology should benefit everyone.

    It includes the first truly universal agreement on the international governance of Artificial Intelligence.

    It commits governments to establishing an independent international Scientific Panel on AI and initiating a global dialogue on its governance within the United Nations.

    The Global Digital Compact represents the first collective effort to reach agreed interoperability standards – essential for consistent measurement. 

    And it supports networks and partnerships to build capacity on AI in developing countries.  
    The Declaration on Future Generations echoes the call of the United Nations Charter to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war, committing governments for the first time to taking the interests of our descendants into account in decisions we take today. 

    Respect for human rights, cultural diversity and gender equality are woven into all three agreements. 

    In the face of a surge in misogyny and a rollback of women’s reproductive rights, governments have explicitly committed to removing the legal, social and economic barriers that prevent women and girls from fulfilling their potential in every sphere. 

    Excellences, 

    Je salue ces trois accords historiques – qui marquent un tournant vers un multilatéralisme plus efficace, plus inclusif et fonctionnant plus en réseaux. 

    Je me suis battu pour les idées portées par ces accords depuis le tout premier jour de mon mandat. 

    Et je serai pleinement engagé dans leur mise en œuvre jusqu’au tout dernier jour. 

    Nous avons ouvert la porte. 

    Il nous incombe désormais – à toutes et à tous – de la franchir. 

    Car il ne s’agit pas seulement de s’entendre – mais aussi d’agir. 

    Aujourd’hui, je vous mets au défi de passer à l’action. 

    De mettre en œuvre le Pacte pour l’avenir – en privilégiant le dialogue et la négociation, en mettant fin aux guerres qui déchirent le monde, et en réformant la composition et les méthodes de travail du Conseil de sécurité. 

    D’accélérer la réforme du système financier international, notamment à l’occasion de la Conférence sur le financement du développement qui se tiendra l’année prochaine.   

    De placer les nouvelles technologies au service de l’intérêt supérieur de l’humanité. 

    Ce qui détermine notre succès – ou échec, ce n’est pas l’adoption d’accords, mais bien nos actions et leur impact sur la vie des populations que nous servons. 

    Excellences, 

    Tout au long de ma vie – que ce soit en tant que militant politique ou aux Nations Unies – j’ai appris que les gens ne sont jamais d’accord sur le passé. 

    Pour rétablir la confiance, nous devons partir du présent et regarder vers l’avenir. 

    Partout dans le monde, les gens aspirent à la paix, à la dignité et à la prospérité. 

    Ils réclament une mobilisation mondiale pour régler la crise climatique, lutter contre les inégalités et faire face aux risques nouveaux et émergents qui menacent l’humanité. 

    Et ils considèrent que l’ONU est indispensable pour résoudre ces défis. 

    Tout cela a été confirmé pendant les deux Journées d’action inspirantes qui viennent de se dérouler.

    Le Sommet de l’avenir trace la voie pour une coopération internationale qui soit à la hauteur de leurs attentes.   

    Alors que nous franchissons ensemble cette première étape cruciale, je tiens à féliciter tous les États membres pour leur contribution. 

    Maintenant, mettons-nous au travail. 

    Et je vous remercie. 

    *****
    [all-English]

    Excellencies, 

    Ladies and gentlemen,

    Welcome to the Summit of the Future. 

    I thank the co-facilitators, the former and current Presidents of the General Assembly, and all Member States, for their strong engagement, creativity, and spirit of compromise; and all my colleagues for their invaluable efforts over the past three years. 

    We are here to bring multilateralism back from the brink.

    I called for this Summit to consider deep reforms to make global institutions more legitimate, fair and effective, based on the values of the UN Charter.  

    I called for this Summit because 21st century challenges require 21st century solutions: frameworks that are networked and inclusive; and that draw on the expertise of all of humanity.  

    I called for this summit because our world is heading off the rails – and we need tough decisions to get back on track.  

    Conflicts are raging and multiplying, from the Middle East to Ukraine and Sudan, with no end in sight.

    Our collective security system is threatened by geopolitical divides, nuclear posturing, and the development of new weapons and theatres of war.  

    Resources that could bring opportunities and hope are invested in death and destruction. 

    Huge inequalities are a brake on sustainable development. Many developing countries are drowning in debt and unable to support their people. 

    And we have no effective global response to emerging, complex and even existential threats. 

    The climate crisis is destroying lives, devastating communities and ravaging economies. 

    We all know the solution – a just phase-out of fossil fuels – and yet, emissions are still rising. 

    New technologies, including AI, are being developed in a moral and legal vacuum, without governance or guardrails. 

    In short, our multilateral tools and institutions are unable to respond effectively to today’s political, economic, environmental and technological challenges. 

    And tomorrow’s will be even more difficult and even more dangerous.  

    When the United Nations was established nearly 80 years ago, it had 51 Member States. Today there are 193. 

    The global economy was less than one-twelfth of its current size.

    As a result, our peace and security tools and institutions, and our global financial architecture, reflect a bygone era. 

    The United Nations Security Council is outdated, and its authority is eroding.  

    Unless its composition and working methods are reformed, it will eventually lose all credibility.  

    The international financial architecture was established when many of today’s developing countries were under colonial rule. 

    It does not represent the realities of today’s global economy, and it is no longer able to resolve global economic challenges: debt, climate action, sustainable development. 

    It does not provide the global safety net that developing countries need. 

    Meanwhile, technology, geopolitics and globalization have transformed power relations. 

    Our world is going through a time of turbulence and a period of transition. 

    But we cannot wait for perfect conditions. We must take the first decisive steps towards updating and reforming international cooperation and make it more networked, fair and inclusive – now.  

    And today, thanks to your efforts, we have. 

    Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen, 

    The Pact for the Future, the Global Digital Compact and the Declaration on Future Generations open pathways to new possibilities and opportunities.

    On peace and security, they promise a breakthrough on reforms to make the Security Council more reflective of today’s world, addressing the historic under-representation of Africa, Asia-Pacific, and Latin America. 

    They lay the foundations for a more agile Peacebuilding Commission, and for a fundamental review of peace operations to make them fit for the conditions they face. 

    They represent the first agreed multilateral support for nuclear disarmament in more than a decade. 

    They recognize the changing nature of conflict, and commit to steps to prevent an arms race in outer space and to govern the use of lethal autonomous weapons.  

    They include measures to mount an immediate and coordinated response to complex global shocks. 

    On sustainable development, these agreements represent major progress towards groundbreaking reforms of the international financial architecture.

    They will help to make its institutions more representative of today’s world, capable of mounting a stronger response to today’s challenges, and able to provide an effective global safety net for developing countries at a time when many of them are suffocating in debt and unable to make progress on the SDGs. 

    The Pact for the Future is about turbocharging the Sustainable Development Goals and the Paris Agreement, accelerating a just transition away from fossil fuels, and securing a peaceful and livable future for everyone on our planet. 

    It includes a groundbreaking commitment by governments to listen to young people and include them in decision-making, at the national and global levels. 

    And it commits to stronger partnerships with civil society, the private sector, local and regional authorities and more. 

    The Global Digital Compact is based on the principle that technology should benefit everyone.

    It includes the first truly universal agreement on the international governance of Artificial Intelligence.

    It commits governments to establishing an independent international Scientific Panel on AI and initiating a global dialogue on its governance within the United Nations.

    The Global Digital Compact represents the first collective effort to reach agreed interoperability standards – essential for consistent measurement. 

    And it supports networks and partnerships to build capacity on AI in developing countries.  

    The Declaration on Future Generations echoes the call of the United Nations Charter to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war, committing governments for the first time to taking the interests of our descendants into account in decisions we take today. 

    Respect for human rights, cultural diversity and gender equality are woven into all three agreements. 

    In the face of a surge in misogyny and a rollback of women’s reproductive rights, governments have explicitly committed to removing the legal, social and economic barriers that prevent women and girls from fulfilling their potential in every sphere. 

    Excellencies, 

    I welcome these three landmark agreements – a step-change towards more effective, inclusive, networked multilateralism. 

    I have been fighting for the ideas in them since the first day of my mandate. 

    And I will be totally committed to their implementation until the very last day. 

    We have unlocked the door. 

    Now it is our common responsibility to walk through it. 

    That demands not just agreement, but action. 

    I challenge you to take that action. 

    To implement the Pact for the Future by prioritizing dialogue and negotiation, ending the wars tearing our world apart, and reforming the composition and working methods of the Security Council. 

    To accelerate reforms of the international financial system – including at next year’s Conference on Financing for Development.   

    To put humanity’s best interests front and centre of new technologies. 

    We stand and fall not by adopting agreements, but by our actions and their impact on the lives of the people we serve.  

    Excellencies, 

    Throughout my life – whether as a political activist or at the United Nations – I have learned that people never agree on the past. 

    To rebuild trust, we must start with the present and look to the future. 

    People everywhere are hoping for a future of peace, dignity, and prosperity. 

    They are crying out for global action to solve the climate crisis, tackle inequality, and address new and emerging risks that threaten everyone. 

    And they see the United Nations as essential to solving these challenges. 

    All this was confirmed during the past two inspirational Action Days. 

    The Summit of the Future sets a course for international cooperation that can meet their expectations.   

    I congratulate all Member States for playing their part as we take these first important steps together. 

    Now, let’s get to work. 

    And I thank you. 
    *****
    [all-French]
    Excellences, 

    Mesdames et messieurs,

    Bienvenue au Sommet de l’avenir.

    Je remercie les co-facilitateurs, l’ancien et l’actuel président de l’Assemblée générale, tous les États membres, pour leur engagement fort, leur créativité et leur esprit de compromis, ainsi que tous mes collègues pour leurs efforts inestimables au cours des trois dernières années.

    Nous sommes ici pour préserver le multilatéralisme des affres de l’échec.

    J’ai demandé que le présent Sommet envisage des réformes profondes visant à rendre les institutions mondiales plus légitimes, plus justes et plus efficaces, sur la base des valeurs énoncées dans la Charte des Nations Unies. 

    J’ai convoqué ce sommet parce que les défis du 21e siècle requièrent des solutions du 21e siècle : des cadres en réseau et inclusifs, qui s’appuient sur les compétences de l’humanité tout entière. 

    J’ai convoqué ce sommet parce que notre monde perd le nord et qu’il nous faut prendre des décisions difficiles pour le remettre sur la bonne voie. 

    Les conflits font rage et se multiplient, du Moyen-Orient à l’Ukraine en passant par le Soudan, sans qu’une fin soit en vue.

    Notre système de sécurité collective est menacé par les dissensions géopolitiques, les prises de positions face au nucléaire, la mise au point de nouvelles armes et l’apparition de nouveaux théâtres d’hostilités.
     
    Les ressources qui pourraient se traduire en potentialités et être porteuses d’espoir sont investies dans la mort et la destruction. 

    Des inégalités colossales freinent le développement durable. De nombreux pays en développement, croulant sous la dette, sont incapables de subvenir aux besoins de leur population. 

    Nous n’avons pas, à l’échelle mondiale, de réponse efficace aux menaces émergentes et complexes, voire existentielles. 

    La crise climatique détruit des vies, dévaste des communautés et ravage des économies. 

    Nous connaissons, toutes et tous, la solution – l’élimination progressive des combustibles fossiles – et pourtant, les émissions ne cessent d’augmenter. 

    Les nouvelles technologies, y compris l’intelligence artificielle, se développent dans un vide éthique et juridique, sans gouvernance ni garde-fou. 

    En somme, nos institutions et instruments multilatéraux sont incapables de relever efficacement les défis politiques, économiques, environnementaux et technologiques d’aujourd’hui. 

    Et les défis de demain seront encore plus difficiles et plus dangereux à relever. 

    À sa création, il y a près de 80 ans, l’Organisation des Nations Unies comptait 51 États Membres. Aujourd’hui, elle en compte 193. 

    L’économie mondiale représentait, à l’époque, moins d’un douzième de sa taille actuelle.

    Nos instruments et institutions de paix et de sécurité, tout comme notre architecture financière mondiale, sont donc le reflet d’une époque révolue. 

    Le Conseil de sécurité de l’ONU est dépassé et son autorité s’érode. 

    Sans une réforme de sa composition et de ses méthodes de travail, il finira par perdre toute crédibilité. 

    L’architecture financière mondiale a été créée à une époque où de nombreux pays en développement se trouvaient sous domination coloniale. 

    Elle ne représente pas les réalités de l’économie mondiale d’aujourd’hui et n’est plus en mesure de relever les défis économiques mondiaux que sont la dette, l’action climatique ou le développement durable. 

    Elle ne fournit pas le filet de sécurité mondial dont les pays en développement ont besoin. 

    Pendant ce temps-là, la technologie, la géopolitique et la mondialisation ont transformé les rapports de force. 

    Notre monde traverse une période de turbulences et de transition. 

    Pour autant, nous ne pouvons attendre l’avènement de conditions parfaites. Nous devons prendre – dès à présent – les premières mesures décisives pour actualiser et réformer la coopération internationale afin de la rendre plus interconnectée, plus équitable et plus inclusive. 

    Et aujourd’hui, grâce à vos efforts, c’est chose faite. 

    Excellences, mesdames et messieurs, 

    Le Pacte pour l’avenir, le Pacte numérique mondial et la Déclaration sur les générations futures sont porteurs de chances et de possibilités nouvelles.

    En ce qui concerne la paix et la sécurité, ces instruments promettent une percée dans les réformes visant à rendre le Conseil de sécurité plus représentatif du monde d’aujourd’hui, en remédiant au problème de la sous-représentation dont ont longtemps souffert l’Afrique, l’Asie-Pacifique et l’Amérique latine. 

    Ils jettent les bases d’une Commission de consolidation de la paix plus agile et d’une révision fondamentale des opérations de paix visant à les adapter aux conditions dans lesquelles elles se déroulent.
     
    Ils représentent le premier soutien multilatéral convenu en faveur du désarmement nucléaire depuis plus d’une décennie.

    Ils prennent en compte la nature évolutive des conflits et prévoient des mesures visant à empêcher la militarisation des nouvelles technologies et des nouveaux domaines, notamment l’espace extra-atmosphérique.

    Ils prévoient des mesures visant à mettre en place une riposte immédiate et coordonnée face à des chocs mondiaux complexes. 

    En ce qui concerne le développement durable, ces accords représentent un progrès majeur vers une grande réforme de l’architecture financière internationale.

    Ils contribueront à rendre ses institutions plus représentatives du monde d’aujourd’hui, capables d’apporter une réponse plus résolue aux défis actuels, et aptes à fournir un filet de sécurité mondial efficace pour les pays en développement – alors que nombre de ces pays, croulant sous la dette, ne peuvent progresser dans la réalisation des Objectifs de développement durable. 

    Le Pacte pour l’avenir vise à revitaliser les Objectifs de développement durable et l’Accord de Paris, à accélérer une transition juste vers un monde affranchi des combustibles fossiles et à garantir un avenir pacifique et vivable à tous les habitants de notre planète. 

    Il comprend un engagement inédit des gouvernements à écouter les jeunes et à les faire participer à la prise de décision, aux niveaux national et mondial.

    Il s’engage également à renforcer les partenariats avec la société civile, le secteur privé, les autorités locales et régionales, et plus encore.

    Le Pacte numérique mondial repose sur le principe selon lequel la technologie doit profiter à toutes et tous.

    Il inclut le premier accord véritablement universel sur la gouvernance internationale de l’intelligence artificielle.

    Il engage les gouvernements à créer un groupe scientifique international indépendant sur l’intelligence artificielle et à entamer un dialogue mondial sur la gouvernance de l’intelligence artificielle, au sein de l’ONU.

    Le Pacte numérique mondial représente le premier effort entrepris à l’échelle collective pour mettre au point des normes d’interopérabilité convenues – essentielles pour la cohérence des mesures et la normalisation. 

    Il encourage, en outre, les réseaux et les partenariats visant à renforcer les capacités en matière d’intelligence artificielle dans les pays en développement. 

    La Déclaration sur les générations futures fait écho à l’appel lancé dans la Charte des Nations Unies, à savoir, préserver les générations futures du fléau de la guerre, engageant pour la première fois les gouvernements à prendre en compte les intérêts de nos descendants dans les décisions prises aujourd’hui. 

    Le respect des droits humains, la diversité culturelle et l’égalité des genres sous-tendent le contenu des trois accords. 

    Face à la montée de la misogynie et au recul des droits des femmes en matière de procréation, les gouvernements se sont expressément engagés à lever les obstacles sociaux, économiques et culturels qui empêchent les femmes et les filles de s’épanouir dans tous les domaines. 

    Excellences, 

    Je salue ces trois accords historiques – qui marquent un tournant vers un multilatéralisme plus efficace, plus inclusif et fonctionnant plus en réseaux. 

    Je me suis battu pour les idées portées par ces accords depuis le tout premier jour de mon mandat. 

    Et je serai pleinement engagé dans leur mise en œuvre jusqu’au tout dernier jour. 

    Nous avons ouvert la porte. 

    Il nous incombe désormais – à toutes et à tous – de la franchir. 

    Car il ne s’agit pas seulement de s’entendre – mais aussi d’agir. 

    Aujourd’hui, je vous mets au défi de passer à l’action. 

    De mettre en œuvre le Pacte pour l’avenir – en privilégiant le dialogue et la négociation, en mettant fin aux guerres qui déchirent le monde, et en réformant la composition et les méthodes de travail du Conseil de sécurité. 

    D’accélérer la réforme du système financier international, notamment à l’occasion de la Conférence sur le financement du développement qui se tiendra l’année prochaine. 

    De placer les nouvelles technologies au service de l’intérêt supérieur de l’humanité. 

    Ce qui détermine notre succès – ou échec, ce n’est pas l’adoption d’accords, mais bien nos actions et leur impact sur la vie des populations que nous servons. 

    Excellences, 

    Tout au long de ma vie – que ce soit en tant que militant politique ou aux Nations Unies – j’ai appris que les gens ne sont jamais d’accord sur le passé. 

    Pour rétablir la confiance, nous devons partir du présent et regarder vers l’avenir. 

    Partout dans le monde, les gens aspirent à la paix, à la dignité et à la prospérité. 

    Ils réclament une mobilisation mondiale pour régler la crise climatique, lutter contre les inégalités et faire face aux risques nouveaux et émergents qui menacent l’humanité. 

    Et ils considèrent que l’ONU est indispensable pour résoudre ces défis. 

    Le Sommet de l’avenir trace la voie pour une coopération internationale qui soit à la hauteur de leurs attentes. 

    Alors que nous franchissons ensemble cette première étape cruciale, je tiens à féliciter tous les États membres pour leur contribution. 

    Maintenant, mettons-nous au travail. 

    Et je vous remercie. 

    MIL OSI United Nations News

  • MIL-OSI Translation: VATICAN/ANGELUS – The Pope: “We are all alive because we have been welcomed”

    MIL OSI Translation. Region: Italy –

    Source: The Holy See in Italian

    Sunday, September 22, 2024

    Vatican Media

    Vatican City (Agenzia Fides) – “We, all of us, are alive because we have been welcomed”. Pope Francis returns to St. Peter’s Square for the traditional Sunday Angelus prayer and thus comments on today’s Gospel passage, in which Jesus announces his death and resurrection to his disciples. But “while Jesus confided to them the meaning of his life”, Francis points out, “they spoke of power. And so now shame closes their mouths, just as pride had previously closed their hearts”. Yet Christ, explains the Pontiff, “openly responds to the whispered words along the way: ‘If anyone wants to be first, let him be last’. Do you want to be great? Make yourself small, put yourself at the service of all”. “This makes you great”, adds the Bishop of Rome off the cuff, then pointing out the reason why the Master “calls a child, places him among the disciples and embraces him. The child has no power: he needs. When we take care of man, we recognize that man always needs life”. “We are all alive because we have been welcomed, but power makes us forget this truth. Then we become masters, not servants, and the first to suffer are precisely the last: the small, the weak, the poor”. “How many people – warns Francis – suffer and die because of power struggles! They are lives that the world rejects, as it rejected Jesus. When He was delivered into the hands of men, He did not find an embrace, but a cross. The Gospel remains, however, a living word full of hope: He who was rejected, is risen”. After the blessing, the Pope’s thoughts go to Honduras, where Juan Antonio López, delegate of the Word of God, coordinator of the social pastoral care of the Diocese of Trujillo and founding member of the pastoral care of integral ecology in Honduras, was killed: “I join in the mourning of that Church – the words of the Pontiff – and in the condemnation of every form of violence. I am close to those who see their basic rights trampled upon and to those who are committed to the common good in response to the cry of the poor and the earth”. Then, a new appeal for peace: “Let us continue to pray for peace. Unfortunately, tension is very high on the war fronts. Let us listen to the voice of the peoples, who ask for peace. Let us not forget the tormented Ukraine, Palestine, Israel, Myanmar, many countries that are at war. Let us pray for peace”. Finally, the inevitable greeting: “I wish everyone a happy Sunday. And please do not forget to pray for me. Enjoy your lunch and goodbye!”. (FB) (Agenzia Fides 22/9/2024) Share:

    EDITOR’S NOTE: This article is a translation. Apologies should the grammar and/or sentence structure not be perfect.

    MIL Translation OSI

  • MIL-OSI Africa: Secretary-General’s remarks at the Opening Segment of the Summit of the Future Plenary [bilingual as delivered, scroll down for all-English and all-French]

    Source: United Nations – English

    xcellencies, 

    Ladies and gentlemen,

    Welcome to the Summit of the Future. 

    I thank the co-facilitators, the former and current Presidents of the General Assembly, and all Member States, for their strong engagement, creativity, and spirit of compromise; and all my colleagues for their invaluable efforts over the past three years. 

    We are here to bring multilateralism back from the brink.

    I called for this Summit to consider deep reforms to make global institutions more legitimate, fair and effective, based on the values of the UN Charter.  

    I called for this Summit because 21st century challenges require 21st century solutions: frameworks that are networked and inclusive; and that draw on the expertise of all of humanity.  

    I called for this summit because our world is heading off the rails – and we need tough decisions to get back on track.  

    Conflicts are raging and multiplying, from the Middle East to Ukraine and Sudan, with no end in sight.

    Our collective security system is threatened by geopolitical divides, nuclear posturing, and the development of new weapons and theatres of war.  

    Resources that could bring opportunities and hope are invested in death and destruction. 

    Huge inequalities are a brake on sustainable development. Many developing countries are drowning in debt and unable to support their people. 

    We have no effective global response to emerging, complex and even existential threats. 
    The climate crisis is destroying lives, devastating communities and ravaging economies. 

    We all know the solution – a just phase-out of fossil fuels – and yet, emissions are still rising. 
    New technologies, including AI, are being developed in a moral and legal vacuum, without governance or guardrails. 

    In short, our multilateral tools and institutions are unable to respond effectively to today’s political, economic, environmental and technological challenges. 

    And tomorrow’s will be even more difficult and even more dangerous.  

    When the United Nations was established nearly 80 years ago, it had 51 Member States. Today there are 193. 

    The global economy was less than one-twelfth of its current size.

    As a result, our peace and security tools and institutions, and our global financial architecture, reflect a bygone era. 

    The United Nations Security Council is outdated, and its authority is eroding.  

    Unless its composition and working methods are reformed, it will eventually lose all credibility.  

    The international financial architecture was established when many of today’s developing countries were under colonial rule. 

    It does not represent the realities of today’s global economy, and it is no longer able to resolve global economic challenges: debt, climate action, sustainable development. 

    It does not provide the global safety net that developing countries need. 

    Meanwhile, technology, geopolitics and globalization have transformed power relations. 

    Our world is going through a time of turbulence and a period of transition. 

    But we cannot wait for perfect conditions. We must take the first decisive steps towards updating and reforming international cooperation to make it more networked, fair and inclusive – now.  

    And today, thanks to your efforts, we have. 

    Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen,

    The Pact for the Future, the Global Digital Compact and the Declaration on Future Generations open pathways to new possibilities and opportunities.

    On peace and security, they promise a breakthrough on reforms to make the Security Council more reflective of today’s world, addressing the historic under-representation of Africa, Asia-Pacific, and Latin America. 

    They lay the foundations for a more agile Peacebuilding Commission, and for a fundamental review of peace operations to make them fit for the conditions they face. 

    They represent the first agreed multilateral support for nuclear disarmament in more than a decade. 

    They recognize the changing nature of conflict, and commit to steps to prevent an arms race in outer space and to govern the use of lethal autonomous weapons.  

    They include measures to mount an immediate and coordinated response to complex global shocks. 

    On sustainable development, these agreements represent major progress towards groundbreaking reforms of the international financial architecture. 

    They will help to make its institutions more representative of today’s world, capable of mounting a stronger response to today’s challenges, and able to provide an effective global safety net for developing countries at a time when many of them are suffocating in debt and unable to make progress on the SDGs. 

    The Pact for the Future is about turbocharging the Sustainable Development Goals and the Paris Agreement, accelerating a just transition away from fossil fuels, and securing a peaceful and livable future for everyone on our planet. 

    It includes a groundbreaking commitment by governments to listen to young people and include them in decision-making, at the national and global levels. 

    And it commits to stronger partnerships with civil society, the private sector, local and regional authorities and more. 

    The Global Digital Compact is based on the principle that technology should benefit everyone.

    It includes the first truly universal agreement on the international governance of Artificial Intelligence.

    It commits governments to establishing an independent international Scientific Panel on AI and initiating a global dialogue on its governance within the United Nations.

    The Global Digital Compact represents the first collective effort to reach agreed interoperability standards – essential for consistent measurement. 

    And it supports networks and partnerships to build capacity on AI in developing countries.  
    The Declaration on Future Generations echoes the call of the United Nations Charter to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war, committing governments for the first time to taking the interests of our descendants into account in decisions we take today. 

    Respect for human rights, cultural diversity and gender equality are woven into all three agreements. 

    In the face of a surge in misogyny and a rollback of women’s reproductive rights, governments have explicitly committed to removing the legal, social and economic barriers that prevent women and girls from fulfilling their potential in every sphere. 

    Excellences, 

    Je salue ces trois accords historiques – qui marquent un tournant vers un multilatéralisme plus efficace, plus inclusif et fonctionnant plus en réseaux. 

    Je me suis battu pour les idées portées par ces accords depuis le tout premier jour de mon mandat. 

    Et je serai pleinement engagé dans leur mise en œuvre jusqu’au tout dernier jour. 

    Nous avons ouvert la porte. 

    Il nous incombe désormais – à toutes et à tous – de la franchir. 

    Car il ne s’agit pas seulement de s’entendre – mais aussi d’agir. 

    Aujourd’hui, je vous mets au défi de passer à l’action. 

    De mettre en œuvre le Pacte pour l’avenir – en privilégiant le dialogue et la négociation, en mettant fin aux guerres qui déchirent le monde, et en réformant la composition et les méthodes de travail du Conseil de sécurité. 

    D’accélérer la réforme du système financier international, notamment à l’occasion de la Conférence sur le financement du développement qui se tiendra l’année prochaine.   

    De placer les nouvelles technologies au service de l’intérêt supérieur de l’humanité. 

    Ce qui détermine notre succès – ou échec, ce n’est pas l’adoption d’accords, mais bien nos actions et leur impact sur la vie des populations que nous servons. 

    Excellences, 

    Tout au long de ma vie – que ce soit en tant que militant politique ou aux Nations Unies – j’ai appris que les gens ne sont jamais d’accord sur le passé. 

    Pour rétablir la confiance, nous devons partir du présent et regarder vers l’avenir. 

    Partout dans le monde, les gens aspirent à la paix, à la dignité et à la prospérité. 

    Ils réclament une mobilisation mondiale pour régler la crise climatique, lutter contre les inégalités et faire face aux risques nouveaux et émergents qui menacent l’humanité. 

    Et ils considèrent que l’ONU est indispensable pour résoudre ces défis. 

    Tout cela a été confirmé pendant les deux Journées d’action inspirantes qui viennent de se dérouler.

    Le Sommet de l’avenir trace la voie pour une coopération internationale qui soit à la hauteur de leurs attentes.   

    Alors que nous franchissons ensemble cette première étape cruciale, je tiens à féliciter tous les États membres pour leur contribution. 

    Maintenant, mettons-nous au travail. 

    Et je vous remercie. 

    *****
    [all-English]

    Excellencies, 

    Ladies and gentlemen,

    Welcome to the Summit of the Future. 

    I thank the co-facilitators, the former and current Presidents of the General Assembly, and all Member States, for their strong engagement, creativity, and spirit of compromise; and all my colleagues for their invaluable efforts over the past three years. 

    We are here to bring multilateralism back from the brink.

    I called for this Summit to consider deep reforms to make global institutions more legitimate, fair and effective, based on the values of the UN Charter.  

    I called for this Summit because 21st century challenges require 21st century solutions: frameworks that are networked and inclusive; and that draw on the expertise of all of humanity.  

    I called for this summit because our world is heading off the rails – and we need tough decisions to get back on track.  

    Conflicts are raging and multiplying, from the Middle East to Ukraine and Sudan, with no end in sight.

    Our collective security system is threatened by geopolitical divides, nuclear posturing, and the development of new weapons and theatres of war.  

    Resources that could bring opportunities and hope are invested in death and destruction. 

    Huge inequalities are a brake on sustainable development. Many developing countries are drowning in debt and unable to support their people. 

    And we have no effective global response to emerging, complex and even existential threats. 

    The climate crisis is destroying lives, devastating communities and ravaging economies. 

    We all know the solution – a just phase-out of fossil fuels – and yet, emissions are still rising. 

    New technologies, including AI, are being developed in a moral and legal vacuum, without governance or guardrails. 

    In short, our multilateral tools and institutions are unable to respond effectively to today’s political, economic, environmental and technological challenges. 

    And tomorrow’s will be even more difficult and even more dangerous.  

    When the United Nations was established nearly 80 years ago, it had 51 Member States. Today there are 193. 

    The global economy was less than one-twelfth of its current size.

    As a result, our peace and security tools and institutions, and our global financial architecture, reflect a bygone era. 

    The United Nations Security Council is outdated, and its authority is eroding.  

    Unless its composition and working methods are reformed, it will eventually lose all credibility.  

    The international financial architecture was established when many of today’s developing countries were under colonial rule. 

    It does not represent the realities of today’s global economy, and it is no longer able to resolve global economic challenges: debt, climate action, sustainable development. 

    It does not provide the global safety net that developing countries need. 

    Meanwhile, technology, geopolitics and globalization have transformed power relations. 

    Our world is going through a time of turbulence and a period of transition. 

    But we cannot wait for perfect conditions. We must take the first decisive steps towards updating and reforming international cooperation and make it more networked, fair and inclusive – now.  

    And today, thanks to your efforts, we have. 

    Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen, 

    The Pact for the Future, the Global Digital Compact and the Declaration on Future Generations open pathways to new possibilities and opportunities.

    On peace and security, they promise a breakthrough on reforms to make the Security Council more reflective of today’s world, addressing the historic under-representation of Africa, Asia-Pacific, and Latin America. 

    They lay the foundations for a more agile Peacebuilding Commission, and for a fundamental review of peace operations to make them fit for the conditions they face. 

    They represent the first agreed multilateral support for nuclear disarmament in more than a decade. 

    They recognize the changing nature of conflict, and commit to steps to prevent an arms race in outer space and to govern the use of lethal autonomous weapons.  

    They include measures to mount an immediate and coordinated response to complex global shocks. 

    On sustainable development, these agreements represent major progress towards groundbreaking reforms of the international financial architecture.

    They will help to make its institutions more representative of today’s world, capable of mounting a stronger response to today’s challenges, and able to provide an effective global safety net for developing countries at a time when many of them are suffocating in debt and unable to make progress on the SDGs. 

    The Pact for the Future is about turbocharging the Sustainable Development Goals and the Paris Agreement, accelerating a just transition away from fossil fuels, and securing a peaceful and livable future for everyone on our planet. 

    It includes a groundbreaking commitment by governments to listen to young people and include them in decision-making, at the national and global levels. 

    And it commits to stronger partnerships with civil society, the private sector, local and regional authorities and more. 

    The Global Digital Compact is based on the principle that technology should benefit everyone.

    It includes the first truly universal agreement on the international governance of Artificial Intelligence.

    It commits governments to establishing an independent international Scientific Panel on AI and initiating a global dialogue on its governance within the United Nations.

    The Global Digital Compact represents the first collective effort to reach agreed interoperability standards – essential for consistent measurement. 

    And it supports networks and partnerships to build capacity on AI in developing countries.  

    The Declaration on Future Generations echoes the call of the United Nations Charter to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war, committing governments for the first time to taking the interests of our descendants into account in decisions we take today. 

    Respect for human rights, cultural diversity and gender equality are woven into all three agreements. 

    In the face of a surge in misogyny and a rollback of women’s reproductive rights, governments have explicitly committed to removing the legal, social and economic barriers that prevent women and girls from fulfilling their potential in every sphere. 

    Excellencies, 

    I welcome these three landmark agreements – a step-change towards more effective, inclusive, networked multilateralism. 

    I have been fighting for the ideas in them since the first day of my mandate. 

    And I will be totally committed to their implementation until the very last day. 

    We have unlocked the door. 

    Now it is our common responsibility to walk through it. 

    That demands not just agreement, but action. 

    I challenge you to take that action. 

    To implement the Pact for the Future by prioritizing dialogue and negotiation, ending the wars tearing our world apart, and reforming the composition and working methods of the Security Council. 

    To accelerate reforms of the international financial system – including at next year’s Conference on Financing for Development.   

    To put humanity’s best interests front and centre of new technologies. 

    We stand and fall not by adopting agreements, but by our actions and their impact on the lives of the people we serve.  

    Excellencies, 

    Throughout my life – whether as a political activist or at the United Nations – I have learned that people never agree on the past. 

    To rebuild trust, we must start with the present and look to the future. 

    People everywhere are hoping for a future of peace, dignity, and prosperity. 

    They are crying out for global action to solve the climate crisis, tackle inequality, and address new and emerging risks that threaten everyone. 

    And they see the United Nations as essential to solving these challenges. 

    All this was confirmed during the past two inspirational Action Days. 

    The Summit of the Future sets a course for international cooperation that can meet their expectations.   

    I congratulate all Member States for playing their part as we take these first important steps together. 

    Now, let’s get to work. 

    And I thank you. 
    *****
    [all-French]
    Excellences, 

    Mesdames et messieurs,

    Bienvenue au Sommet de l’avenir.

    Je remercie les co-facilitateurs, l’ancien et l’actuel président de l’Assemblée générale, tous les États membres, pour leur engagement fort, leur créativité et leur esprit de compromis, ainsi que tous mes collègues pour leurs efforts inestimables au cours des trois dernières années.

    Nous sommes ici pour préserver le multilatéralisme des affres de l’échec.

    J’ai demandé que le présent Sommet envisage des réformes profondes visant à rendre les institutions mondiales plus légitimes, plus justes et plus efficaces, sur la base des valeurs énoncées dans la Charte des Nations Unies. 

    J’ai convoqué ce sommet parce que les défis du 21e siècle requièrent des solutions du 21e siècle : des cadres en réseau et inclusifs, qui s’appuient sur les compétences de l’humanité tout entière. 

    J’ai convoqué ce sommet parce que notre monde perd le nord et qu’il nous faut prendre des décisions difficiles pour le remettre sur la bonne voie. 

    Les conflits font rage et se multiplient, du Moyen-Orient à l’Ukraine en passant par le Soudan, sans qu’une fin soit en vue.

    Notre système de sécurité collective est menacé par les dissensions géopolitiques, les prises de positions face au nucléaire, la mise au point de nouvelles armes et l’apparition de nouveaux théâtres d’hostilités.
     
    Les ressources qui pourraient se traduire en potentialités et être porteuses d’espoir sont investies dans la mort et la destruction. 

    Des inégalités colossales freinent le développement durable. De nombreux pays en développement, croulant sous la dette, sont incapables de subvenir aux besoins de leur population. 

    Nous n’avons pas, à l’échelle mondiale, de réponse efficace aux menaces émergentes et complexes, voire existentielles. 

    La crise climatique détruit des vies, dévaste des communautés et ravage des économies. 

    Nous connaissons, toutes et tous, la solution – l’élimination progressive des combustibles fossiles – et pourtant, les émissions ne cessent d’augmenter. 

    Les nouvelles technologies, y compris l’intelligence artificielle, se développent dans un vide éthique et juridique, sans gouvernance ni garde-fou. 

    En somme, nos institutions et instruments multilatéraux sont incapables de relever efficacement les défis politiques, économiques, environnementaux et technologiques d’aujourd’hui. 

    Et les défis de demain seront encore plus difficiles et plus dangereux à relever. 

    À sa création, il y a près de 80 ans, l’Organisation des Nations Unies comptait 51 États Membres. Aujourd’hui, elle en compte 193. 

    L’économie mondiale représentait, à l’époque, moins d’un douzième de sa taille actuelle.

    Nos instruments et institutions de paix et de sécurité, tout comme notre architecture financière mondiale, sont donc le reflet d’une époque révolue. 

    Le Conseil de sécurité de l’ONU est dépassé et son autorité s’érode. 

    Sans une réforme de sa composition et de ses méthodes de travail, il finira par perdre toute crédibilité. 

    L’architecture financière mondiale a été créée à une époque où de nombreux pays en développement se trouvaient sous domination coloniale. 

    Elle ne représente pas les réalités de l’économie mondiale d’aujourd’hui et n’est plus en mesure de relever les défis économiques mondiaux que sont la dette, l’action climatique ou le développement durable. 

    Elle ne fournit pas le filet de sécurité mondial dont les pays en développement ont besoin. 

    Pendant ce temps-là, la technologie, la géopolitique et la mondialisation ont transformé les rapports de force. 

    Notre monde traverse une période de turbulences et de transition. 

    Pour autant, nous ne pouvons attendre l’avènement de conditions parfaites. Nous devons prendre – dès à présent – les premières mesures décisives pour actualiser et réformer la coopération internationale afin de la rendre plus interconnectée, plus équitable et plus inclusive. 

    Et aujourd’hui, grâce à vos efforts, c’est chose faite. 

    Excellences, mesdames et messieurs, 

    Le Pacte pour l’avenir, le Pacte numérique mondial et la Déclaration sur les générations futures sont porteurs de chances et de possibilités nouvelles.

    En ce qui concerne la paix et la sécurité, ces instruments promettent une percée dans les réformes visant à rendre le Conseil de sécurité plus représentatif du monde d’aujourd’hui, en remédiant au problème de la sous-représentation dont ont longtemps souffert l’Afrique, l’Asie-Pacifique et l’Amérique latine. 

    Ils jettent les bases d’une Commission de consolidation de la paix plus agile et d’une révision fondamentale des opérations de paix visant à les adapter aux conditions dans lesquelles elles se déroulent.
     
    Ils représentent le premier soutien multilatéral convenu en faveur du désarmement nucléaire depuis plus d’une décennie.

    Ils prennent en compte la nature évolutive des conflits et prévoient des mesures visant à empêcher la militarisation des nouvelles technologies et des nouveaux domaines, notamment l’espace extra-atmosphérique.

    Ils prévoient des mesures visant à mettre en place une riposte immédiate et coordonnée face à des chocs mondiaux complexes. 

    En ce qui concerne le développement durable, ces accords représentent un progrès majeur vers une grande réforme de l’architecture financière internationale.

    Ils contribueront à rendre ses institutions plus représentatives du monde d’aujourd’hui, capables d’apporter une réponse plus résolue aux défis actuels, et aptes à fournir un filet de sécurité mondial efficace pour les pays en développement – alors que nombre de ces pays, croulant sous la dette, ne peuvent progresser dans la réalisation des Objectifs de développement durable. 

    Le Pacte pour l’avenir vise à revitaliser les Objectifs de développement durable et l’Accord de Paris, à accélérer une transition juste vers un monde affranchi des combustibles fossiles et à garantir un avenir pacifique et vivable à tous les habitants de notre planète. 

    Il comprend un engagement inédit des gouvernements à écouter les jeunes et à les faire participer à la prise de décision, aux niveaux national et mondial.

    Il s’engage également à renforcer les partenariats avec la société civile, le secteur privé, les autorités locales et régionales, et plus encore.

    Le Pacte numérique mondial repose sur le principe selon lequel la technologie doit profiter à toutes et tous.

    Il inclut le premier accord véritablement universel sur la gouvernance internationale de l’intelligence artificielle.

    Il engage les gouvernements à créer un groupe scientifique international indépendant sur l’intelligence artificielle et à entamer un dialogue mondial sur la gouvernance de l’intelligence artificielle, au sein de l’ONU.

    Le Pacte numérique mondial représente le premier effort entrepris à l’échelle collective pour mettre au point des normes d’interopérabilité convenues – essentielles pour la cohérence des mesures et la normalisation. 

    Il encourage, en outre, les réseaux et les partenariats visant à renforcer les capacités en matière d’intelligence artificielle dans les pays en développement. 

    La Déclaration sur les générations futures fait écho à l’appel lancé dans la Charte des Nations Unies, à savoir, préserver les générations futures du fléau de la guerre, engageant pour la première fois les gouvernements à prendre en compte les intérêts de nos descendants dans les décisions prises aujourd’hui. 

    Le respect des droits humains, la diversité culturelle et l’égalité des genres sous-tendent le contenu des trois accords. 

    Face à la montée de la misogynie et au recul des droits des femmes en matière de procréation, les gouvernements se sont expressément engagés à lever les obstacles sociaux, économiques et culturels qui empêchent les femmes et les filles de s’épanouir dans tous les domaines. 

    Excellences, 

    Je salue ces trois accords historiques – qui marquent un tournant vers un multilatéralisme plus efficace, plus inclusif et fonctionnant plus en réseaux. 

    Je me suis battu pour les idées portées par ces accords depuis le tout premier jour de mon mandat. 

    Et je serai pleinement engagé dans leur mise en œuvre jusqu’au tout dernier jour. 

    Nous avons ouvert la porte. 

    Il nous incombe désormais – à toutes et à tous – de la franchir. 

    Car il ne s’agit pas seulement de s’entendre – mais aussi d’agir. 

    Aujourd’hui, je vous mets au défi de passer à l’action. 

    De mettre en œuvre le Pacte pour l’avenir – en privilégiant le dialogue et la négociation, en mettant fin aux guerres qui déchirent le monde, et en réformant la composition et les méthodes de travail du Conseil de sécurité. 

    D’accélérer la réforme du système financier international, notamment à l’occasion de la Conférence sur le financement du développement qui se tiendra l’année prochaine. 

    De placer les nouvelles technologies au service de l’intérêt supérieur de l’humanité. 

    Ce qui détermine notre succès – ou échec, ce n’est pas l’adoption d’accords, mais bien nos actions et leur impact sur la vie des populations que nous servons. 

    Excellences, 

    Tout au long de ma vie – que ce soit en tant que militant politique ou aux Nations Unies – j’ai appris que les gens ne sont jamais d’accord sur le passé. 

    Pour rétablir la confiance, nous devons partir du présent et regarder vers l’avenir. 

    Partout dans le monde, les gens aspirent à la paix, à la dignité et à la prospérité. 

    Ils réclament une mobilisation mondiale pour régler la crise climatique, lutter contre les inégalités et faire face aux risques nouveaux et émergents qui menacent l’humanité. 

    Et ils considèrent que l’ONU est indispensable pour résoudre ces défis. 

    Le Sommet de l’avenir trace la voie pour une coopération internationale qui soit à la hauteur de leurs attentes. 

    Alors que nous franchissons ensemble cette première étape cruciale, je tiens à féliciter tous les États membres pour leur contribution. 

    Maintenant, mettons-nous au travail. 

    Et je vous remercie. 

    MIL OSI Africa

  • MIL-OSI USA: Attorney General James and CUNY Announce Ruschell Boone Scholarship

    Source: US State of New York

    NEW YORK – New York Attorney General Letitia James and the City University of New York (CUNY) Board of Trustees Chairperson William C. Thompson, Jr. today announced the establishment of the Ruschell Boone Scholarship, a memorial fund in honor of the late award-winning journalist that will support West Indian students pursuing journalism degrees at the Craig Newmark Graduate School of Journalism at CUNY or Baruch College. Ruschell Boone was an Emmy award-winning reporter at Spectrum News NY1, and a graduate of CUNY’s Baruch College who passed away in 2023 following a brave battle against pancreatic cancer. The scholarship is supported by an initial endowment of $125,000 pledged by the CUNY Board of Trustees and University supporters and will help defray the cost of college-related expenses for students.

    “Ruschell Boone was a brilliant journalist who touched the lives of everyone she encountered,” said Attorney General James. “Her understanding of this city, its communities, and its people truly made her a New York City treasure. She uplifted people whose stories were often overlooked, and always showed up during the tough and scary times because she knew her reporting brought comfort to this city. With this scholarship, Ruschell’s legacy lives on – empowering a future generation of journalists to embody her authenticity and compassion. I am so grateful to Chair Thompson and CUNY for providing this scholarship and honoring Ruschell in the most impactful way.”

    “We are proud to honor Ruschell Boone, continuing the principle she lived by, with this new scholarship in her name for CUNY students,” said CUNY Board of Trustees Chairperson William C. Thompson Jr. “We are appreciative to her fellow CUNY alumna, New York State Attorney General Letitia James, for having the idea to preserve Ruschell’s legacy in this meaningful way.”

    “Ruschell Boone made a name for herself in her two decades keeping New Yorkers informed on NY1, even as she battled pancreatic cancer,” said CUNY Chancellor Félix V. Matos Rodríguez. “She was an inspirational Baruch alumna who made it her mission to support those who came after her, and it is our honor to keep the memory of her dedication to mentorship alive with this scholarship.”

    “Ruschell’s presence leapt off the screen,” said Spectrum Networks Executive Vice President Michael Bair. “She was effervescent, on and off camera. She was also a fierce, ambitious, and determined journalist. She set high standards for herself, NY1, and our whole city. It is only fitting that her incomparable legacy live on through this investment in the next generation of journalists.”

    Ruschell dedicated her career to telling the stories of New York’s diverse communities and made it her personal mission to give back to the community and inspire youth to pursue their passions. In recognition of this mission, Attorney General James and the CUNY Board of Trustees established the Ruschell Boone Scholarship to defray the cost of tuition, fees, and other college-related expenses for West Indian students pursuing degrees in journalism at CUNY.

    Ruschell was born in Kingston, Jamaica, where she spent her early childhood before immigrating to the Bronx at age 11. As a student at Baruch College, Ruschell discovered a passion for journalism, which first led her to CNBC and CNN, and ultimately landed her at Spectrum News NY1 in 2002. In her 20 years at NY1, Ruschell was beloved by New Yorkers for her thoughtful, informative reporting and focus on communities that were often ignored, marginalized, or misrepresented.

    In addition to her coverage of countless major events, including the pandemic, Hurricane Sandy, the 2016 bombing in Manhattan, and protests for racial justice, Ruschell was known as a strong community presence and a familiar face at many marquee New York events. She was the first to interview Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez after the then-candidate’s stunning Democratic primary win, an exclusive interview that quickly became a viral sensation. Ruschell earned multiple awards for her work, including Best Spot News Reporting from the New York Association of Black Journalists, Best Feature Reporting from the New York Press Club, and a New York Emmy Award for her series, “New York: Unfiltered.”

    For donations to the Ruschell Boone Scholarship Fund, checks may be payable to the City University of New York and will be deposited in a separate account at the CUNY Endowment Fund for the purpose of funding the scholarships. If a 501(c)3 is required for the donation, then checks may be made payable to the Research Foundation of the City University of New York, where they will be held in a separate account.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: Readout of the Secretary-General’s meeting with H.E. Mr. Sadyr Zhaparoz, President of the Kyrgyz Republic

    Source: United Nations secretary general

    The Secretary-General met with H.E. Mr. Sadyr Zhaparov, President of the Kyrgyz Republic. They discussed cooperation between the United Nations and Kyrgyzstan, debt relief, and the climate and mountain agenda.
     
    The President briefed on developments in Kyrgyzstan. The Secretary-General expressed his appreciation for Kyrgyzstan’s support for the Summit of the Future and the adopted documents. They also exchanged views on regional cooperation in Central Asia.
     

    MIL OSI United Nations News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: STATEMENT: PACT FOR THE FUTURE NEEDS TO INVOLVE CHILDREN TO CREATE REAL CHANGE

    Source: Save The Children

    UNITED NATIONS, 22 September 2024 – World leaders adopting the Pact for the Future at the United Nations today need to put children at the centre of policies and programmes to address issues which affect them such as conflict, the climate crisis and inequality, Save the Children said. 

    The Pact and its annexes were adopted by consensus at the opening ceremony of The Summit of the Future. World leaders and decision-makers are meeting from 22-23 September to discuss how to accelerate action on the UN’s Global Goals agreed in 2015 to build a fairer and more equal world.  

    The Pact envisions a world where countries work better together to address future challenges, achieve the Global Goals, and strengthen international cooperation on issues like sustainable development, international peace and security, digital innovation, and global governance. 

    Inger Ashing, Save the Children International CEO, at The Summit of the Future, said: 

    “We very much welcome the adoption of the Pact for the Future. We are glad that world leaders have come together to show that multilateralism can address the challenges facing current and future generations of children. We are cautiously optimistic about the Pact, and hope that the United Nations, members states, civil society and the private sector can work together to deliver on its promises and create real change for children.  

    “Now that the Pact has been adopted, it’s critical that world leaders put children’s rights at the centre of policies and programmes, in order to address issues which impact their lives, and create a safer, more equitable and sustainable world. We need all actors to work closely with children to implement the Pact.” 

    Save the Children is pleased to see the inclusion of children in the Pact but has been advocating for the document to be more child-sensitive, as the future belongs to them. We consulted with children leading up to the Summit, and they are calling for involvement in decisions that affect their lives. Children have the right to have their views heard in decision-making and have the best insights into what actions are needed to protect their futures. 

     For further enquiries please contact:

    Our media out of hours (BST) contact is media@savethechildren.org.uk / +44(0)7831 650409

    Please also check our Twitter account @Save_GlobalNews for news alerts, quotes, statements and location Vlogs.

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Body located in search for missing man Bret Hill

    Source: New Zealand Police (District News)

    Police were notified about 1.40pm on Sunday that a body had been located by a member of the public near the Birchville Dam in Upper Hutt.

    Formal identification has established the body is that of missing Upper Hutt man Bret Hill.

    We extend our sympathies to his family and friends.

    Mr Hill’s body was removed yesterday afternoon, and a scene examination was carried out.

    His death will be referred to the Coroner.

    We would like to thank the members of the public who assisted Police and provided information during the search for Mr Hill.

    ENDS

    Issued by the Police Media Centre

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: 2024 LDC Fellowship awarded

    Source: Leadership Development Centre

    Ben Clark is the recipient of the 2024 LDC Fellowship.

    The Leadership Development Centre  is pleased to announce the 2024 LDC Fellowship recipient is Ben Clark.

    Ben is the Director Pae Ora (Healthy Futures) at the Department of Corrections – Ara Poutama. His time as Regional Public Service Commissioner for Canterbury and Chatham Islands stoked his interest in building unity of purpose. 

    Ben’s fellowship will explore how we can help Public Service leaders collaborate and lead complex systems. 

    Read more on our LDC Fellowships page.

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-Evening Report: ‘Breakthrough discovery’: Indigenous Rangers in outback WA find up to 50 night parrots – one of Australia’s most elusive birds

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Rachel Paltridge, Adjunct Senior Research Fellow, ecology, The University of Western Australia

    In arid inland Australia lives one of Australia’s rarest birds: the night parrot. Missing for more than a century, a live population was rediscovered in 2013. But the species remains elusive.

    Until recently, Australia’s known night parrot population numbered in the tens of birds, scattered across desert in Queensland and Western Australia.

    But our research team – consisting of Indigenous rangers and scientists – has made a breakthrough discovery. We’ve detected the largest known night parrot population in the world: perhaps as many as 50, living in WA’s Great Sandy Desert, on land managed by the Ngururrpa people. Our results are published today.

    Urgent action is needed to protect these vulnerable populations and ensure the night parrot doesn’t go missing a second time, perhaps for good.

    The night parrot lives in arid inland Australia. Pictured: an 1890 illustration by Elizabeth Gould.
    Wikimedia, CC BY

    A highly mysterious species

    The night parrot was once found throughout Australia’s arid inland, but its numbers plummeted in the late 19th century.

    The bird was not definitely recorded for more than 100 years, until a dead bird was found near Boulia in western Queensland in 1990. Another dead bird was found in Diamantina National Park, also in western Queensland, in 2006.

    In 2013 a small population was found by naturalist John Young in south-western Queensland. That area is now a wildlife reserve.

    Night parrots are notoriously difficult to detect. They build tunnels in dense spinifex and hide there by day, emerging at night to forage. They are known only from populations in remote south-west Queensland and central and northern Western Australia. The species is critically endangered.

    In Western Australia, Indigenous cultural knowledge about the species includes stories about how difficult the bird is to find. There are also whispered stories of mothers telling children the night parrot’s call was the sound of an evil spirit, and warning them not to stray from camp.

    A short video explaining the night parrot project.

    What we did

    The Ngururrpa Indigenous Protected Area is in the Great Sandy Desert. It comprises vast areas of sandplains and dunefields, and smaller areas of floodplain and spinifex which are key night parrot habitats.

    The researchers recorded night parrots using ‘songmeters’.
    Ngururrpa Rangers/Facebook

    Ngururrpa Rangers worked with scientists to learn how to use sound recorders to search for night parrots. We then searched for the birds on Country between 2018 and 2023.

    We combined the rangers’ detailed knowledge of habitats, water and seed resources with geology maps, satellite imagery and fire history data. From this we selected 31 potential roosting areas, then deployed sound recorders called “songmeters” at those sites.

    We wanted to detect the night parrots’ distinctive calls which consist of whistles, croaks and bell-like sounds.

    The acoustic data we gathered was then analysed to extract any bird calls in the night parrot’s frequency range. Potential detections were verified using a reference library of known night parrot calls.

    Our results

    We detected night parrot calls at 17 of 31 sites. Of these, ten were roost sites, where night parrot calls were detected in the hour after sunset and the hour before sunrise.

    Individual night parrots are thought to have unique calls. We analysed how many different calls we could hear, and how loud they were (which can tell us when birds are calling from different locations). From this we built a picture of the identity and number of individuals regularly occupying a site.

    We extrapolated this across the 58 patches of potential night parrot habitat on the Ngururrpa Indigenous Protected Area. We concluded up to 20 roosting areas may be occupied by night parrots.

    Based on the numbers at roosting sites where we recorded calls, we estimate 40–50 night parrots could be present in the Ngururrpa Indigenous Protected Area.



    Fire and predators pose grave threats

    Once we found the night parrot populations, we wanted to know what threats they faced.

    We used camera-traps to identify predators and also collected their scats (poos) to analyse their diets.

    Ngururrpa Ranger Kathryn Njamme with a night parrot feather.
    Ngururrpa IPA

    Dingoes were the predator detected most frequently in night parrot roosting habitat. Our cameras captured them ten times more often than feral cats. And we found dingoes regularly eat feral cats at night parrot sites.

    Based on information from other areas, we suspect cats are a key predator of night parrots. Dingoes could be important in suppressing cat numbers and helping the parrots survive. So, attempts to limit predators in night parrot habitat should not harm dingoes.

    We also analysed 40 years of satellite imagery to assess the threat of fire to night parrots’ roosting habitat. Based on the vegetation types and flammability of surrounding landscapes, we found bushfires sparked by lightning are a much bigger threat to night parrots in the Great Sandy Desert than in Queensland.

    Strategic aerial and ground burning, to reduce fuel loads, already occurs in the Ngururrpa Indigenous Protected Area. As our knowledge of night parrots improves, these programs can become more targeted to protect key night parrot areas.

    Ngururrpa Rangers using ‘Felixer’ devices to selectively control cats in night parrot habitat.
    Ngururrpa IPA

    Keeping night parrots alive

    A long-term monitoring program for night parrots on Ngururrpa Country should be established to help better understand and protect this vitally important population.

    And the remote, wild nature of the landscape should be retained. This means minimising disturbance from people and vehicles, and continuing to exclude livestock and weeds.

    Clifford Sunfly has articulated how the rangers want to help protect night parrots into the future:

    We would like to spend more time on Country to find where [night parrots] are and understand what they are doing.

    We want those scientists to come and help us catch some night parrots and tag them. We also need more snake-cams (inspection cameras) too and more songmeters. And a kit for collecting scats for DNA.

    One day we would love to have our own research facility for doing our night parrot surveys. It would be our dream to have our own research base on Ngururrpa.

    Rachel Paltridge receives funding from the National Environmental Science Program’s Resilient Landscapes Hub, and the Indigenous Desert Alliance.

    Clifford Sunfly is a Ngururrpa Ranger. The ranger program receives funding from the WA government’s Aboriginal Ranger Program and the State NRM Program.

    Nicholas Leseberg receives funding from the Australian and Queensland Governments. He works for Bush Heritage Australia, and as a consultant on night parrots for many projects.

    ref. ‘Breakthrough discovery’: Indigenous Rangers in outback WA find up to 50 night parrots – one of Australia’s most elusive birds – https://theconversation.com/breakthrough-discovery-indigenous-rangers-in-outback-wa-find-up-to-50-night-parrots-one-of-australias-most-elusive-birds-239449

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: United Christian Hospital appeals to public for missing patient

    Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

    The following is issued on behalf of the Hospital Authority:

         â€‹A spokesperson for United Christian Hospital (UCH) made the following appeal today (September 23) regarding a patient leaving the hospital without notification:

         An 80-year-old male patient with dementia was sent to the Accident and Emergency Department of UCH at around 9pm yesterday (September 22) by ambulance. While waiting for consultation, the patient left the Accident and Emergency Department without notification at around 11.30pm.

         Security guards were deployed to search for the patient within the hospital compound and in the vicinity. The hospital also made a report to the Police for assistance. The patient is yet to be located. The hospital is very concerned about the incident and will fully cooperate with the Police in order to locate the patient.

         The patient is about 1.6 metres tall, with short white hair and has a slim build. CCTV footage showed that the patient was wearing a white short-sleeved shirt, black trousers and black shoes when he left. The hospital appeals to the public to contact the hospital at 3949 4002 or the Police if they know the whereabouts of the patient.

         The hospital has reported the incident to the Hospital Authority Head Office through the Advance Incident Reporting System.

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-Evening Report: Do footy’s best and fairest awards achieve what they claim?

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Hunter Fujak, Senior Lecturer in Sport Management, Deakin University

    Football’s awards season kicks off this week, with the AFL’s Brownlow Medal awarded on Monday evening and the NRL’s Dally M awarded on October 2.

    Both medals aim to crown their league’s best regular season player.

    Historical voting patterns, however, question whether they achieve this objective, or rather award the most influential key position player from the season’s most successful teams.

    How to assess a fairest and best player?

    A curiosity of the Australian sport landscape is that all four major football codes use a different panel of judges in award voting.

    The AFL’s Brownlow Medal is voted on by umpires, while the NRL’s Dally M is determined by a pool of media pundits and ex-players.

    Rugby Australia’s John Eales Medal is voted on by players, and the A-League’s Johnny Warren Medal is judged by a four-body panel that consists of a technical football expert, football media representative, former player and match officials.

    Each one of these structures produces unique biases and criticisms.

    The Brownlow: the midfielder’s medal

    The Brownlow was devised as an award for the fairest and best player of the AFL competition, reflecting the often understated importance of fair play that umpires are uniquely positioned to judge.

    The Brownlow’s voting system has long been a topic of interest for fans, pundits and academics alike.

    While Lachie Neale’s surprise victory in 2023 generated renewed controversy, the Brownlow has long been criticised as a midfielders award.

    Melbourne’s Herald, in 1938, stated:

    Under the present method, men playing on the full-forward or full-back lines have little chance of winning the award usually being won by men most constantly in the play who are able to stand out in comparatively weak sides.

    This observation around weak sides reflected that from 1931 to 1938, the Brownlow went on an eight-season run of being won by a player not from a finals team.

    Indeed, among the first 49 Brownlow winners from 1924 to 1969, only 31% came from finalists.

    Since 1970, 72% of winners have come from a finals team (noting the finals system has changed over time).

    One consistent long-term trend has been the dominance of midfielders.

    Among the 27 Brownlows awarded this millennium, only Adam Goodes (a two-time winner) would not be considered primarily a midfielder.

    This positional dominance is not unique to AFL.

    Soccer’s most pre-eminent global award, the Ballon d’Or, has been awarded 66 times, of which a defender has been the recipient only four times and a goalkeeper once.

    The Dally M suffers from a similar concentration.

    The Dally M: the media medal

    The Dally M has been awarded since 1979, becoming rugby league’s premier individual honour in 1998 with the formation of the NRL.

    In 45 years of voting, the winner has come from a non-finalist team on only six occasions (13%).

    The award is also won near exclusively by the “spine” positions of fullback, five-eighth, halfback and hooker, which account for 91% of medallists.

    The Dally M uses a pool of media pundits and ex-players for voting on each match, creating the potential for obvious conflicts of interests.

    During seasons 2019 and 2020 for instance, 12 of the Brisbane Broncos’ 44 matches were judged by ex-Broncos players. On four of these instances, former player Darren Lockyer was the judge, despite being an active non-executive director of the Brisbane Broncos organisation.

    Voting in nearly 22% of matches in these two seasons was performed by judges who played or coached for one of the participating teams.

    NRL Chairman Peter V’Landys initiated a review of the Dally M following a surprise winner in 2020 (Jack Wighton), claiming the voting system disadvantaged players from winning teams.

    Whilst this supposition disregarded that 88% of all 2020 Dally M points were awarded to players from the winning team, voting was modified for the 2023 season.

    This revised system introduced an additional judge to produce two independent voters per match, and in a widely criticised move, veiled these judges with anonymity.

    This new system has revealed just how little experts agree when trying to assess subjective performance.

    In the opening five rounds of 2023, the two judges picked the same player of the match in less than half (48%) of fixtures.

    In a third of matches (31%), one judge’s best on ground did not poll any points with the other judge.

    In one instance, the two judges chose six completely different players in their respective 3-2-1 votes (round five, 2023, Bulldogs v Cowboys).



    Player and coach awards: The true best and fairest?

    Although the Brownlow and Dally M dominate the public limelight, team accolades are typically held in high standing within sport clubs, as internal recognition is often more highly valued than external status within high performance cultures.

    Such player and coach awards, typically forming part of season-end club events, can be argued as more accurate assessments of player performance.

    This is because the voters – teammates and/or coaches – best understand the roles and expectations of each player within the team’s overarching game plan.

    For this reason, in the AFL, there is often wide discrepancies between a team’s distribution of Brownlow votes and a club’s internal award votes.

    In 2023, for instance, six of 18 AFL clubs crowned a best and fairest who was different from their highest Brownlow vote-getter.

    The most notable of this was Brisbane, where key defender Harris Andrews won the club’s best and fairest, despite finishing 44th in Brownlow voting.

    Defender Harry Sheezel similarly won North Melbourne’s best and fairest despite finishing fifth from his team in the Brownlow count.

    Is there a perfect solution?

    Recent shock winners in both codes saw media organisations perform “forensic analysis” of voting patterns.

    In the AFL, former Collingwood president and media personality Eddie McGuire proposed a “panel of elders” while the NRL’s V’Landys proposed rating every player for every match, to determine their respective awards.

    Such scrutiny has undoubtedly been fuelled by the datafication of sport and its athletes, which has seen player performance statistics enter the sporting mainstream.

    Is it notable then that the AFL reaffirmed their existing policy in early 2024 to preclude umpires from accessing player statistics in casting their votes.

    Indeed statistics may not offer the perfect solution some believe.

    Any statistical assessment of player performance remains underpinned by human judgement as to the importance of each metric, whilst missing the qualitative nuance that surrounds key match plays and moments.

    Ultimately then, there may not be a perfect method to determine a league’s best and fairest player and, arguably, it is this human judgement dimension which makes these awards so engaging as a public spectacle.

    The authors do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Do footy’s best and fairest awards achieve what they claim? – https://theconversation.com/do-footys-best-and-fairest-awards-achieve-what-they-claim-237978

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-Evening Report: Basic service provider or mini democracy? Why NZ needs to decide what it wants from local government

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Jeffrey McNeill, Honorary Research Associate, School of People, Environment and Planning, Te Kunenga ki Pūrehuroa – Massey University

    Prime Minister Christopher Luxon’s recent challenge to local government “to rein in the fantasies and to get back to delivering the basics brilliantly” was unsurprising, given his government’s focus on fiscal restraint.

    It was in keeping with his announcement that councils’ legislative purpose of delivering their communities’ economic, social, environmental and cultural wellbeing are to be removed from the Local Government Act.

    Local government responded with the usual indignation and suggested solutions. There were complaints about inadequate funding mechanisms, questions about whether libraries are basic services. The whole spat likely flew under the radar of the wider public.

    Yet the problems facing local government are very real and will not just go away by kicking costly decisions down the road. Rather, they are symptomatic of fundamental choices facing the sector.

    Foundational issues

    The problems go back to the late 1980s when our current local government system was designed.

    Led by then local government minister Michael Bassett, the reforms were the first in over 100 years. More than 850 city, borough and county councils, catchment boards, united councils and local boards were amalgamated to form 86 in 1989 and now 78 regional, city and district councils we have today.

    But Bassett still considered local government reform incomplete because of the failure to address water provision.

    But I would argue the real unfinished business was the failure to resolve the purpose of local government in the first place. Only when that is agreed can we address local government’s functions, form and funding.

    Until then, the shape and function of local government will remain a political football.

    According to section 10(1)(a) of the Local Government Act 2002, the purpose of local government is “to enable democratic local decision-making and action by, and on behalf of, communities”.

    But the second subsection describing its purpose, (s.10(1)(b)) has changed with the various governments. In 2002, under Helen Clark’s Labour-led government, the purpose of local government was:

    to promote the social, economic, environmental, and cultural well-being of communities in the present and for the future.

    John Key’s National-led government in 2012 replaced that purpose with a remit

    to meet the current and future needs of communities for good-quality local infrastructure, local public services, and performance of regulatory functions in a way that is most cost-effective for households and businesses.

    The previous Labour government reintroduced the wellbeing purpose. Luxon is set to remove it.

    Function, form and funding

    Should local government be a true local government with comprehensive and wide powers, or simply a property-services organisation, providing little more than street-lighting, roading, water and sewerage?

    The two very different conceptions of local government determine its functions, form and funding.

    These differing views reflect the disparate Anglophone and European concepts of local government. National aligns with the Anglophone model, with its limited local government functions under a strong central government. Labour leans towards the European model, with devolved wide-ranging functions.

    The distinction between the two models was made very clear to me while working as part of an international team researching local government responses to the COVID-19 pandemic.

    My Italian colleague, for example, reported how his country’s local governments were vitally involved in their cities’ day to day management during the crisis.

    Mayors and councils were making daily decisions and announcements about their hospitals’ resourcing, whether to close the schools and training institutes, increase social welfare provision and housing, and so on.

    On the flipside, New Zealand local government was largely sidelined to address humanitarian services such as ensuring people had access to food and accommodation.

    Instead, councils searched for local “shovel-ready” infrastructure projects to access central government funds in order to reduce unemployment and stimulate local economies. The public focused on national daily press announcements from the prime minister and director-general of health.

    No appetite strong local government

    For all that, the distinction between Labour and National conceptions of local government may not be as great as recent history suggests.

    Both want a strong centre and weak local government. Our councils have largely reinforced this reality. Some have sought to extend their scope of activities, others have clearly defined themselves as property services agencies.

    Most have largely refrained from the excesses the prime minister appears to be concerned about, partly to avoid being caught out by changes in central government, but also because most council expenditure is already committed to infrastructure.

    But does it have to be this way?

    The Labour-led government’s 2021 Future for Local Government review envisaged local government using partnerships with hapū and iwi to promote the four key wellbeings as key to any reform. This is at odds with the present government’s priorities and views on governing with Māori – a big reason why the reports now collect dust.

    The review was also very constrained in considering local government functions. Rather, it seemingly took existing functions as its starting point to focus instead on local governance.

    Writing about our local government nearly 70 years ago, public servant and academic R.J. Polaschek imagined what would have been if New Zealand had been colonised by Denmark instead of Great Britain. In this hypothetical scenario he saw strong independent local government based on communities with wide-ranging functions.

    It still could be, but tinkering at the edges is not going to solve its problems. Our local government project remains unfinished business. It will take political courage and vision to complete the task. One that remains a fantasy, and we are all the losers.

    Jeffrey McNeill does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Basic service provider or mini democracy? Why NZ needs to decide what it wants from local government – https://theconversation.com/basic-service-provider-or-mini-democracy-why-nz-needs-to-decide-what-it-wants-from-local-government-238862

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-Evening Report: Why isn’t dental included in Medicare? It’s time to change this – here’s how

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Peter Breadon, Program Director, Health and Aged Care, Grattan Institute

    Engin Akyurt/Unsplash

    When the forerunner of Medicare was established in the 1970s, dental care was left out. Australians are still suffering the consequences half a century later.

    Patients pay much more of the cost of dental care than they do for other kinds of care.

    More Australians delay or skip dental care because of cost than their peers in most wealthy countries.

    And as our dental health gets worse, fees keep on rising.

    For decades, a litany of reports and inquiries have called for universal dental coverage to solve these problems.

    Now, with the Greens proposing it and Labor backbenchers supporting it, could it finally be time to put the mouth into Medicare?

    What’s stopping us?

    The Australian Dental Association says the idea is too ambitious and too costly, pointing out it would need many more dental workers. They say the government should start small, focusing on the most vulnerable populations, initially seniors.

    Starting small is sensible, but finishing small would be a mistake.

    Dental costs aren’t just a problem for the most vulnerable, or the elderly. More than two million Australians avoid dental care because of the cost.

    More than four in ten adults usually wait more than a year before seeing a dental professional.

    Bringing dental into Medicare will require many thousands of new dental workers. But it will be possible if the scheme is phased in over ten years.

    The real reason dental hasn’t been added to Medicare is it would cost billions of dollars. The federal government doesn’t have that kind of money lying around.

    Australia has a structural budget problem. Government spending is growing faster than revenue, because we are a relatively low-tax country with high service expectations.

    The growing cost of health care is a major contributor, with hospitals and medical benefits among the top six fastest-growing major payments.

    The structural gap is only likely to grow without major policy changes.

    So, can we afford health care for all? We can. But we should do it with smart choices on dental care, and tough choices to raise revenue and reduce spending elsewhere.

    Smart choices about a new dental scheme

    The first step is to avoid repeating the mistakes of Medicare.

    Medicare payments to private businesses haven’t attracted them to a lot of the communities that need them the most. Many rural and disadvantaged areas are bulk-billing deserts with too few GPs.

    The poorest areas have more than twice the psychological distress of the wealthiest areas, but they get about half the Medicare-funded mental health services.

    As a result, government money isn’t going where it will make the biggest difference.

    There are about 80,000 hospital visits each year for dental problems that could have been avoided with dental care. If there is too little care in disadvantaged and rural communities, where oral health is worst, that number will remain high.

    That’s why a significant share of new investment should be quarantined for public dental services, with those services targeted to areas where people are missing out on care.

    Another problem with Medicare is its payments often have little relationship to the cost of care, or the impact that care has on the patient’s health.

    To tamp down costs, Medicare funding for dental care should exclude cosmetic treatments and orthodontics. It should be based on efficient workforce models where dental assistants and therapists use all their skills – you might not always need to see a dentist.

    Sometimes you might see a dental therapist instead.
    Gustavo Fring/Pexels

    The funding model should take account of a patient’s needs, reward giving them ongoing care, and have a cap on spending per patient.

    Oral health should be measured and recorded, to make sure patients and taxpayers are getting results.

    Tough choices to balance the budget

    Those steps would slash the cost of The Greens’ plan, which is hard to estimate but might reach more than $20 billion a year once it’s phased in. Instead, the cost would fall to roughly $7 billion a year.

    That would be a good investment. But if you’re worried about where the money will come from, there are good ways to pay for it.

    Many reforms could reduce government health budgets without harming patients.

    There is waste in government funding of pathology tests and less cost-effective medicines.

    In some hospitals, there are excessive costs and potentially harmful low-value care.

    Over the longer-term, investments in prevention can reduce demand for health care. A tax on sugary drinks, for example, would improve health while raising hundreds of millions of dollars a year.

    Measures like this would help the government pay for more dental care. But demand for health care will keep growing as the population ages, and as expensive new treatments arrive.

    This means a broader strategy is needed to meet the three goals of balancing the budget, keeping up with growing health-care demand, and bringing dental into Medicare.

    Adding dental to Medicare would mean some tradeoffs.
    Lafayett Zapata Montero/Unsplash

    There are no easy solutions, but there are many options to reduce spending and boost revenue without hurting economic growth.

    Choosing Australia’s infrastructure and defence megaprojects more wisely could save several billion dollars each year.

    Undoing Western Australia’s special GST funding deal – described by economist Saul Eslake as “the worst Australian public policy decision of the 21st Century thus far” – would save another $5 billion a year.

    Reducing income tax breaks and tax minimisation opportunities – including by reining in superannuation tax concessions, reducing the capital gains tax discount, limiting negative gearing, and setting a minimum tax on trust distributions – could raise more than $20 billion a year.

    Major tax reform like this offers economic benefits while creating space for better services such as universal dental coverage.

    No one likes spending cuts and tax hikes, but they will be needed sooner or later regardless. Dental coverage might be just the sweetener taxpayers need to accept it.

    Grattan Institute, has been supported in its work by government, corporates, and philanthropic gifts.

    A full list of supporting organisations is published at www.grattan.edu.au.

    ref. Why isn’t dental included in Medicare? It’s time to change this – here’s how – https://theconversation.com/why-isnt-dental-included-in-medicare-its-time-to-change-this-heres-how-239086

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-Evening Report: How did they get my data? I uncovered the hidden web of networks behind telemarketers

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Priya Dev, Lecturer & Academic Data Science, Digital Assets & Distributed Ledgers, Australian National University

    Kokhan O/Shutterstock

    Last year, I started getting a lot of unsolicited phone calls, mainly from people trying to sell me things. This came as a surprise because, as a data scientist, I am very careful about what personal information I let out into the world. So I set out to discover what had happened.

    My investigation took several months. It eventually led me to the labyrinthine world of data brokers.

    In today’s digital age, where personal data is a new kind of gold, these companies wield significant power, creating networks where our personal information is shared between brokers and telemarketers as easily as TikTok videos. Their businesses profit from the data they collect, and many of the calls they enable come from scammers.

    This comes at an enormous cost: in 2023, Australians lost $2.7 billion to scams. This highlights the urgent need for stronger privacy protections to limit how our personal data is collected and shared.

    In an attempt to address this need, the Australian government this month introduced long-overdue privacy reforms. But these reforms are still inadequate for the many privacy issues affecting people today, including targeting by data brokers and telemarketers.

    Investigating the hidden web

    One of the mechanisms designed to protect us from unwanted calls is the Do Not Call Register.

    Managed by the Australian Communications and Media Authority, the registry holds more than 12 million phone numbers, including mine. The registry is supposed to block unsolicited calls. But last year, despite being on the list, I began to receive dozens of unwanted calls – on average, about three per day.

    Curious, I started tracing the origins of these calls. What I uncovered was a network of hidden connections between data brokers, telemarketers and large organisations – including a major political party. It became clear that simply being on the Do Not Call Register wasn’t enough to protect my privacy.

    I started by asking the callers what data they held, and how they had obtained mine. I requested details about the companies they represented, including their websites and Australian Business Numbers (ABNs) – the unique identifiers for Australian businesses.

    Most callers hung up the moment I started asking questions, until one day I spoke with a man named Paul, who worked in the real estate sector – an industry worth more than $10 trillion as of 2024. The high-value real-estate market makes our personal data especially valuable to businesses operating within the industry.

    Digging deeper

    The unique thing about Paul was that he knew my real name, whereas other telemarketers only had access to the pseudonyms I’d used to protect my identity online. Paul explained he had licensed my data from the real estate giant CoreLogic Australia.

    This discovery pushed me to dig deeper. After a lot of back and forth, I finally obtained my data from CoreLogic. The amount of information was small, but surprisingly accurate – especially considering the steps I’d taken to hide my identity. It made me wonder where they got it from, as only organisations such as utility companies, banks or the government would hold that type of information.

    CoreLogic told me in an email that:

    CoreLogic gets data from a variety of sources … most of the information we collect comes from public records, which we license from government departments and agencies. We may also collect personal information from third parties such as through real estate agents, tenancy and strata mangers, financial institutions and marketing database providers.

    This was a troubling discovery, because the institutions on which we depend for essentials such as public services, housing and finance – and from which we can’t hide our identities – may be selling our personal information to data brokers, who then pass it along to telemarketers.

    What’s even more alarming is that the data is shared unmasked, meaning personal details such as our names, genders and phone numbers are fully visible. Once this information is out in the open, it becomes almost impossible to control how it’s recorded or shared.

    It’s also nearly impossible to stop it being passed to overseas telemarketers, who aren’t bound by Australian privacy laws.

    Real estate giant CoreLogic says most of the personal data it collects comes from public records.
    IgorGolovniov/Shutterstock

    Solving the mystery

    My investigation didn’t end there.

    Eventually, CoreLogic revealed it had purchased my data from Australian data broker firm Smrtr in August 2023. This coincided with the surge in unsolicited calls.

    Through Smrtr I learned they had purchased my data in 2016 from another data broker, EightDragons Digital. Smrtr also admitted to selling my data to various companies – all without my consent.

    Determined to investigate the origin of my online data trail, I contacted EightDragons Digital, which calls itself “a leading global consumer data agency”. It collects personal data for big brands including Energy Australia, Vodafone, NRMA, Nissan, Johnnie Walker, American Express, The Good Guys, and even the Australian Labor Party.

    The company claimed it collected my data in a 2014 marketing campaign, and likely passed it to at least 50 other companies. However, it had no records to verify the marketing campaign or prove that I had given consent.

    A small step only

    CoreLogic defended its practices as legal, saying it’s too difficult to verify consent or anonymise personal data.

    However, with modern technology, it’s actually possible to track where data comes from, check consent, and share insights without exposing personal details such as names and phone numbers.

    The government’s recent privacy reforms are a small step in the right direction. But until data brokers are required to obtain explicit consent before trading personal information, they fall far short of being a giant leap forward.

    Priya Dev does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. How did they get my data? I uncovered the hidden web of networks behind telemarketers – https://theconversation.com/how-did-they-get-my-data-i-uncovered-the-hidden-web-of-networks-behind-telemarketers-238991

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-Evening Report: With all these defamation lawsuits, what ever happened to free speech?

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Brendan Clift, Lecturer in Law, The University of Melbourne

    Shutterstock

    It seems like the dust barely settles from the latest high-profile defamation stoush before the next set of litigants straps on the gloves and steps into the ring.

    Many of these cases raise eyebrows — and questions. Was that story about him? Does anyone remember that tweet? Wasn’t it just harmless banter? Didn’t she respond to that allegation? What if it’s all true? Isn’t that free speech? How much did you say this will cost?!

    Defamation law continues to loom large over public conversations, despite recent law reforms aimed at remedying Australia’s unwanted reputation as the “defamation capital of the world”.

    At the heart of defamation law lies a tension between protecting reputation and maintaining freedom of speech. The more robustly defamation law protects reputation, the more it constrains speech.

    Free speech is valued in Australian law, politics and society, notwithstanding our lack of an explicit constitutional speech right. So why does our defamation law facilitate seven-figure lawsuits over communicative slights that, at times, seem disproportionately minor?

    What shapes these laws?

    Defamation law is old — very old — with roots in English law half a millennium ago. For several hundred years it existed in parallel with publishing monopolies, political and moral censorship, and fears that loose talk could stoke public disorder.

    In other words, our defamation law substantially predates modern conceptions of civil and political rights. Some of its features, like strict rather than fault-based liability (the plaintiff need not prove anything about the defendant’s intentions or degree of care), retain the flavour of less liberal times.

    Libel laws in the western world, as seen here in the US in the 1730s, are very old.
    Library of Congress

    Still, defamation has developed over the years and adapted with transplantation to other legal systems.

    The defamation laws of different places are influenced by factors such as community values, prevailing views on the value of speech, the nature and democratic credentials of the political system, and the role of law and the constitution in regulating citizens and the state.

    For example, the United States is culturally and historically predisposed to liberty and suspicion of government. The freedom to discuss and debate public affairs is seen as essential to its democratic system. The First Amendment to the US Constitution is the world’s most famous free speech law.

    Accordingly, US courts have limited defamation on matters of public concern to deliberate or reckless lies, while opinions on any newsworthy topic are immune from suit. This is because US democracy requires the “marketplace of ideas” to be minimally constrained and largely self-regulating.

    On the other hand, less democratic states have kept their defamation laws strict, to suppress political dissent and silence critical media.

    A case in point is Singapore, which, under founding father Lee Kwan Yew and his perpetually-in-power People’s Action Party, has weaponised defamation law against political opposition and the press.




    Read more:
    With more lawsuits potentially looming, should politicians be allowed to sue for defamation?


    That is not to say that less defamation law is automatically better than more. The interest in maintaining a (deserved) good reputation is legitimate. And speech anarchism can allow low-value and harmful speech to flourish.

    The High Court of Australia has shied away from US-style speech liberalism for fear it could facilitate speech that is harmful to the integrity of political discourse: a prescient position given recent US history. The English courts have done similarly, influenced by distrust of the tabloid press.

    But when reputation and speech fall out of balance, defamation law risks infringing both democratic values and fundamental rights.

    Legal balancing acts

    Around the turn of the millennium, English defamation law reached a crossroads. Its relative stasis had turned the United Kingdom into a “libel tourism” hotspot, and the UK was falling behind on the speech protections mandated by the European Convention on Human Rights.

    So the UK courts moved to better protect publishers by creating a new defence for responsible publication in the public interest. That was followed in 2013 by a new Defamation Act to further simplify, clarify and rebalance defamation law.

    Australia, lacking the same constitutional or convention impetus, has been slow to follow suit. The states agreed to harmonise their disparate defamation laws only in 2005, and it was 2021 before they found the appetite to improve them.

    By then, Australia had taken over the UK’s mantle as the preferred destination for defamation plaintiffs.

    Australia’s 2021 reforms included a new defence for publication of public-interest material, which generated some excitement but hasn’t substantially liberated the media from defamation threats. It amounts to tinkering around the edges of law, which remains conservative at its core.

    Today, from a practical standpoint, the biggest problem with defamation may be its cost.

    Legal advice and correspondence are expensive, settlements more so, and the cost of litigation can be eye-watering. It’s one problem if you can’t afford to assert your legal rights; it’s quite another to be slapped with an unexpected complaint. Defamation disputes can easily bankrupt individuals and exhaust media budgets.




    Read more:
    Why defamation suits in Australia are so ubiquitous — and difficult to defend for media organisations


    Legal consequences can act as an incentive for better journalism, but they also chill public-interest reporting. Even a journalist assured of their facts will find proving them in court to be a different matter. And a win does not guarantee full recovery of costs, let alone time and stress.

    The debate over defamation law reform is ongoing. The central question remains how best to balance the interest in reputation with the benefits of free speech. The answers depend on what we really value, and what our commitment to liberal democracy really requires.

    Brendan Clift does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. With all these defamation lawsuits, what ever happened to free speech? – https://theconversation.com/with-all-these-defamation-lawsuits-what-ever-happened-to-free-speech-238312

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: SH2 Wharerata Road lookout area temporarily closed for safety improvements

    Source: New Zealand Transport Agency

    Work gets underway this week on improvements to the State Highway 2 Wharerata Road Lookout rest area and carpark, about 45 minutes south of Gisborne.

    For the next 2 months, ahead of the summer holiday season, crews will rebuild the rest area and car park and lay new asphalt, alongside installing new street furniture so people pulling off the state highway have an improved area to check their phones, make a call or just take a break before continuing their journey.

    Subject to weather conditions, crews will be active on site between 6am and 6pm, Monday to Saturday, and during this time the shoulder approaching the rest area and carpark will be closed with a reduced temporary speed limit in place of 30km/h. At times the passing lane approaching the rest area and carpark may also be temporarily closed for the safety of crews.

    Throughout the works the rest area and carpark will be closed 24/7 to all vehicles.

    Two lanes of traffic on the state highway will remain flowing and there should be little disruption to journeys.

    NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi wants to thank those who will be inconvenienced by the temporary closure of the rest area and carpark for their understanding while these improvements happen.

    This work is part of Connecting Tairāwhiti, which is a programme of projects providing more slow vehicle bays and more places to pull off the road safely to check messages or take a break on State Highways 2 and 35 across the Tairāwhiti and northern Hawke’s Bay regions. The programme also includes some resilience projects to strengthen and stabilise sites on State Highway 35 to help it remain open and functional during disruptions such as weather events.

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: State Highway 6 Whangamoa closed following serious crash

    Source: New Zealand Transport Agency

    UPDATE 9:40 pm: State Highway 6 is now open under stop/go traffic management and a 30’km/h temporary speed limit following a serious crash on the Whangamoa Hill earlier this evening.
    Drivers can expect delays when travelling through the crash site until the highway is fully reopened.

    UPDATE 8:15 pm:

    State Highway 6 remains closed this evening, with emergency services and contractors attend a serious crash on the Whangamoa Hill. State Highway 6 is closed to all traffic between Hira and the Rai Valley and is expected to remain closed until the Police Serious Crash Unit completes its investigation.

    Drivers must avoid the area, delay their travel, or detour via State Highway 63 Wairau Valley and St Arnaud.

    6:15pm:

    State Highway 6 is closed between Nelson and Blenheim this evening as emergency services and contractors attend a serious crash on the Whangamoa Hill.
    The single-vehicle crash, which occurred near the Kokorua Road intersection, was reported around 5 pm.

    The highway is closed in both directions and is expected to remain closed for several hours while the Police Serious Crash Unit investigates.

    There are no available local road detours, and the only route between Nelson and Blenheim is via State Highway 63 – St Arnaud and the Wairau Valley.

    This significantly longer route can add over 30 minutes or more to travel times. Drivers must factor this into their travel plans, particularly those with ferry connections in Picton.

    Road users must avoid the area and should consider delaying their journeys.

    Updates on the highway’s status can be found on the NZTA Waka Kotahi website:

    Highway Conditions – Nelson Marlborough(external link)

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Overnight stop/go on SH1 Manakau for maintenance work

    Source: New Zealand Transport Agency

    |

    A stretch of State Highway 1 south of the Manakau Rail overbridge between Ōtaki and Levin will be under stop/go traffic management on Monday night.

    During the overnight work, crews will be providing a more permanent fix for potholes in the area.

    Crews will be onsite near Whakahoro Road on the evening of Monday 23 September, between 7pm and 6am to complete the work.

    While work is underway stop/go traffic management will be in place, with a 30km/h speed limit. We expect minimal delays due to this work.

    This work will see a more permanent solution to the potholes that have developed over the winter months. We understand the importance of ensuring potholes are repaired and filled as quickly, and safely as possible, for the safety of all road users.

    This work is weather dependent and could be postponed to a later date if necessary.

    Tags

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Youths steal car at fast-food outlet

    Source: South Australia Police

    Police are investigating following an aggravated robbery in the northern suburbs late last night.

    Just before midnight on Monday 23 September, patrols were called to Curtis Road at Munno Para after reports of a robbery.

    Police will allege a group of youths approached a man who was leaving a fast-food restaurant.  The group made conversation with the man as he got into the driver’s seat of his car.  One youth prevented him from closing his door and assaulted him.

    The victim exited the car, and a teen has threatened him with a paper cutter and grabbed his phone and car keys from his hands.

    The group all got into the car, a dark blue Toyota Corolla Sedan with registration S874CHG, and were last seen heading east on Curtis Road.

    The victim, a 27-year-old man from Marion, was taken to hospital where he was treated for minor injuries.

    Police are investigating and ask anyone who spots the stolen dark blue coloured Toyota Corolla Sedan with registration S874CHG to contact the police assistance line on 131 444.

    If anyone has information about the incident they are asked to contact Crime Stoppers.  You can anonymously provide information to Crime Stoppers online at https://crimestopperssa.com.au or free call 1800 333 000.

    MIL OSI News