NewzIntel.com

    • Checkout Page
    • Contact Us
    • Default Redirect Page
    • Frontpage
    • Home-2
    • Home-3
    • Lost Password
    • Member Login
    • Member LogOut
    • Member TOS Page
    • My Account
    • NewzIntel Alert Control-Panel
    • NewzIntel Latest Reports
    • Post Views Counter
    • Privacy Policy
    • Public Individual Page
    • Register
    • Subscription Plan
    • Thank You Page

Category: Asia Pacific

  • MIL-OSI USA: Murphy, Van Hollen, Sanders, Kaine, Schatz File Joint Resolutions Of Disapproval On $1.6B In Arms Sales To United Arab Emirates

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Connecticut – Chris Murphy

    May 15, 2025

    WASHINGTON–As President Trump actively engages in the corruption of U.S. foreign policy, U.S. Senators Chris Murphy (D-Conn.), Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii), and Tim Kaine (D-Va.), members of the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee, and U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) on Thursday filed joint resolutions of disapproval (JRD) that would block three arms sales to the United Arab Emirates (UAE). At the Token 2049 crypto conference in Dubai in April, MGX, an investment firm backed by the Emiratis, announced that it would use a stablecoin issued by World Liberty Financial, a crypto company directly backed by the Trump family, to facilitate a $2 billion investment in the Binance cryptocurrency exchange. Concerns have also been raised about the UAE’s arming of the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), who have killed tens of thousands of people in Sudan and furthered the civil war in that country.
    The three sales include:
    Six CH-47F Block II Chinook helicopters and associated equipment, valued at $1.32 billion (see text)
    F-16 aircraft components, accessories and defense services, valued at $130 million (see text)
    Spare and repair parts to support the United Arab Emirates’ fleet of AH-64 Apache, UH-60 Black Hawk, and CH-47 Chinook aircraft, and other logistics and program support, valued at $150 million (see text)
    “The Emiratis invested $2 billion in a company run by the sons of the President of the United States and the Special Envoy to the Middle East. Now, the administration wants to sell $1.6 billion in military aircraft to the UAE. Trump’s foreign policy is really that simple – make him and his family richer in exchange for favors like arms sales and access to our most advanced computer chips. If a foreign government is participating in this kind of nuclear grade corruption by directly enriching the President and his family, we are going to force a full Senate debate on that behavior and a vote on their security relationship with the United States,” said Murphy.
    “As I’ve repeatedly said, the United States should not provide weapons to the UAE until they cease arming the murderous RSF – a paramilitary group in Sudan that has prolonged the civil war, brought on humanitarian catastrophe, and committed genocide. The U.S. should not be delivering weapons to the UAE as it aids and abets this humanitarian disaster and gross human rights violations. We must stop this corrupt Trump family crypto-for-arms deal and use our leverage to prevent more suffering in Sudan – and bring its civil war to a peaceful resolution,” said Van Hollen.
    “Everywhere I go in Virginia, I hear about how worried folks are about price hikes because of President Trump’s tariffs and the massive cuts he’s trying to implement on basic government services, including Medicaid. Meanwhile, he’s hatching secret plans with corrupt foreign governments to enrich himself with crypto deals, golf courses, and a luxury plane?” said Kaine. “I’m glad to be working with my colleagues to force votes on legislation challenging arms sales to Qatar and the United Arab Emirates to make it clear that bribing an American president is one of the fastest ways to poison your relationship with the United States. Countries around the world should take notice.”
    “Trump’s personal business ties with the UAE while pushing for U.S. arms sales is a blatant conflict of interest,” said Schatz. “This is no way for the leader of the free world to conduct foreign policy.”
    “The UAE is exploiting Trump’s greed by routing $2 billion through a cryptocurrency scheme that will bring his family tens of millions a year, all while lobbying the President for arms sales and access to sensitive technology. This is blatant corruption and we must not let it stand,” said Sanders.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    May 16, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Westport Publishes Annual General and Special Meeting Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    VANCOUVER, British Columbia, May 15, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Westport Fuel Systems Inc. (“Westport” or the “Company”) (TSX:WPRT / Nasdaq:WPRT), today held its Annual General and Special Meeting of Shareholders (the “Meeting”) in a virtual format. Shareholders approved all resolutions presented at the meeting including the election of all nominated directors for the ensuing year, the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company’s auditors for the fiscal year, the advisory vote on executive compensation, and the sale of Westport Fuel Systems Italia S.r.l in accordance with the terms of the sale and purchase agreement dated as of March 30, 2025.

    A summary of the results are as follows:

    Resolution Outcome
    of Vote
    Percentage of
    Votes For
    Percentage of
    Votes
    Withheld/Against
           
    Election of Directors      
    Michele Buchignani Approved 81.22% 18.78%
    Anthony Guglielmin Approved 87.16% 12.84%
    Daniel M. Hancock Approved 61.47% 38.53%
    Daniel Sceli Approved 91.10% 8.90%
    Karl-Viktor Schaller Approved 61.28% 38.72%
    Eileen Wheatman Approved 81.43% 18.57%
           
    Appointment of Auditors Approved 93.83% 6.17%
           
    Executive Compensation      
    (Advisory Vote) Agree 52.87% 47.13%
           
    Sale of Westport Fuel Systems Italia S.r.l Approved 83.38% 16.62%


    About Westport Fuel Systems

    At Westport Fuel Systems, we are driving innovation to power a cleaner tomorrow. We are a leading supplier of advanced fuel delivery components and systems for clean, low-carbon fuels such as natural gas, renewable natural gas, propane, and hydrogen to the global transportation industry. Our technology delivers the performance and fuel efficiency required by transportation applications and the environmental benefits that address climate change and urban air quality challenges. Headquartered in Vancouver, Canada, with operations in Europe, Asia, North America, and South America, we serve our customers in approximately 70 countries with leading global transportation brands. At Westport Fuel Systems, we think ahead. For more information, visit www.wfsinc.com.

    Investor Inquiries:
    Investor Relations
    T: +1 604-718-2046
    E: invest@wfsinc.com

    The MIL Network –

    May 16, 2025
  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: NZ to subject Pandemic Treaty to full National Interest Test

    Source: NZ Music Month takes to the streets

    The Government will subject a draft Pandemic Treaty to a full National Interest Test before deciding whether or not New Zealand should sign up to it, Foreign Minister Winston Peters and Health Minister Simeon Brown say. 

    The draft Treaty will be discussed at the annual meeting of the World Health Assembly in Geneva from next week 

    “Decisions about how New Zealand responds to any health emergency are made in Wellington, not Geneva, and we are determined to preserve our sovereign decision-making ability,” Mr Peters says.

    “While negotiations on the draft Treaty have been completed, there are a number of steps remaining – which are likely to take some years – before the New Zealand Government will take a decision on whether or not we should sign up.”

    Mr Brown noted that, after three years of negotiation, the World Health Assembly next week would have the Pandemic Treaty presented to it for adoption.

    “New Zealand supports the aim of strengthening global health systems and to improve pandemic preparedness and response,” Mr Brown says.

    “This will also help New Zealand support our Pacific partners to better manage future pandemic responses in our region.”

    Mr Peters says that it is very important to New Zealand that its sovereign decision making on health is protected. 

    “Any Treaty needs to confirm the sovereignty of countries to address public health matters within their borders and gives no power to the WHO or any other international body to direct, order, or change national laws or policies, or to direct countries to take specific actions, such as ban or accept travellers, impose vaccination mandates, or implement lockdowns.”

    “For these reasons, any future decision on whether or not to sign and ratify the Pandemic Treaty will be informed by a full National Interest Test.” 

    MIL OSI New Zealand News –

    May 16, 2025
  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Update on Kopu Road incident

    Source: New Zealand Police

    Kopu Road between Kopu and Thames has reopened, after being closed earlier this morning when a person was found with what appeared to be serious injuries.

    Police have now established that the person had suffered a medical event.

    The person has been airlifted to Waikato Hospital and the road has reopened.

    ENDS

    Issued by Police Media Centre. 

    MIL OSI New Zealand News –

    May 16, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Video: Never Forget Our Fallen

    Source: United States Department of Defense (video statements)

    —————
    Located in @ArlingtonNatl, the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier has served as a symbolic grave for all military warriors whose remains have not been found or identified since 1921. The tomb is guarded around-the-clock regardless of inclement weather by sentinels from the @OldGuardVideo.

    #DYK The Tomb of the Unknown Soldier currently holds three unidentified service members, representing soldiers from #WWI, #WWII and the Korean War. A fourth soldier previously buried in the tomb, representing the Vietnam War, was identified in 1998 and returned to his family.

    History on the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier
    https://www.defense.gov/multimedia/experience/tomb-of-the-unknown-soldier/

    For more on the Department of Defense, visit: http://www.defense.gov
    —————
    Keep up with the Department of Defense on social media!

    Like the DoD on Facebook: http://facebook.com/DeptofDefense
    Follow the DoD on Twitter: http://twitter.com/DeptofDefense
    Follow the DoD on Instagram: http://instagram.com/DeptofDefense
    Follow the DoD on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/DeptofDefense

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qU4TVGVoFL8

    MIL OSI Video –

    May 16, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Congresista Ramirez Leads 109 Members to Protect the Constitutional Right to Birthright Citizenship

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Delia Ramirez – Illinois (3rd District)

    Washington, DC —  Today, Congresswoman Delia C. Ramirez (IL-03), proud daughter of immigrants and citizen by birthright, introduced legislation to block the implementation of President Trump’s unconstitutional Executive Order that illegally and unconstitutionally seeks to end citizenship for children born in the United States. The Born in the USA Act is co-led by a coalition of Members of Congress that includes the Hispanic Caucus Chair Adriano Espaillat (NY-13), Asian Pacific American Caucus Chair Grace Meng (NY-06), Black Caucus Chair Yvette Clarke (NY-09), Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Jamie Raskin (MD-08), and Derek Tran (CA-45)

    The legislation prohibits any government funds from being appropriated or used to carry out President Donald Trump’s unconstitutional and illegal Executive Order 14160, “Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship.”

    “Trump has posed the question of who gets to be an American. The fact is that every citizen not naturalized in this country is a citizen by birthright. And it is important to remember that our nation’s history would not be complete without the children of immigrants who, like me, are citizens by birthright and pride themselves on being AMERICANS, said Congresswoman Ramirez.” I am both a daughter of immigrants and the daughter of America;  a proud Chapina and an American by birthright. It is my honor to lead 109 members of Congress to ensure not a single dollar goes to Trump’s illegal, unconstitutional attempt to undermine our Constitution, our rights, our liberties, and the soul of our nation.” 

    “Protecting birthright citizenship from Donald Trump’s reckless executive order is our duty, not only as Democrats, but as Americans,” said CHC Chair Adriano Espaillat. “The Fourteenth Amendment was forged in the ashes of the Civil War and refined through 150 years of jurisprudence. No president can change it by executive order, and Trump’s shameless attempt to do so is a grave threat to the very ideals of our nation and of a binding Constitution. Unilaterally modifying the highest law in the land is antithetical to our American values, and we will continue to fight these heinous actions by an administration that seeks to redefine what we, as a nation, stand for.”

    “Birthright citizenship is enshrined in the Constitution and has been affirmed by the Supreme Court numerous times — including in the landmark United States v. Wong Kim Ark decision — yet President Trump is determined to overrule this century-old precedent and eliminate one of the most common pathways for Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders to become U.S. citizens,” said Rep. Grace Meng, Chair of the Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus. “Not on our watch. I am proud to introduce the Born in the USA Act with my colleagues to stand up for American values and stand against this unconstitutional executive overreach.”

    “Birthright citizenship has been the law of the land since 1868, when the 14th Amendment overturned Dred Scott and established equal citizenship by birth,” said Ranking Member Jamie Raskin. “Donald Trump cannot erase the parts of the Constitution he doesn’t like or decide who counts as an American by executive order. The Born in the USA Act will ensure that no taxpayer dollars are used to enforce this unlawful order, which would compel federal agencies, from the State Department to the Social Security Administration, to deny or question U.S. citizenship for children born on American soil, thereby undermining a fundamental constitutional right that has defined our nation since the Civil War.”

    “For over 140 years, birthright citizenship has been a cornerstone of American law and culture,” said Rep. Derek Tran. “We have always been a nation of immigrants–my own parents came to this country as refugees, and I gained citizenship through the birthright principle. So many people across the country share my story and have enriched our nation in countless ways as productive members of American society. I’m proud to stand with my colleagues in introducing the Born in the USA Act to protect birthright citizenship and ensure that all those born on U.S. soil are awarded the Constitutional protections they deserve.”

    The bill is cosponsored by Congressmembers Raja Krishnamoorthi (IL-08), Eleanor Holmes Norton (DC-AL), Juan Vargas (CA-52), Shri Thanedar (MI-13), Rashida Tlaib (MI-12), Henry Johnson (GA-04), Jasmine Crockett (TX-30), Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (NY-14), Linda T. Sánchez (CA-38), Becca Balint (VT-AL), Jesús G. “Chuy” García (IL-04), Madeleine Dean (GA-05), Nikema Williams (GA-05), André Carson (IN-07), Lateefah Simon (CA-12), James P. McGovern (MA-02), Sylvia R. Garcia (TX-29), Ritchie Torres (NY-15), Jonathan L. Jackson (IL-01), Nydia M. Velázquez (NY-07), Mary Gay Scanlon (PA-05), Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick (FL-20), Yassamin Ansari (AZ-03), Robert Garcia (CA-42), Bonnie Watson Coleman (NJ-12), Dan Goldman (NY-10), Maxwell Frost (FL-10), Paul D. Tonko (NY-20), Darren Soto (FL-09), Dave Min (CA-47), Mark Pocan (WI-02), Bennie G. Thompson (MS-2), Andrea Salinas (OR-06), Sydney Kamlager-Dove (CA-37), LaMonica McIver (NJ-10), Pramila Jayapal (WA-07), Dina Titus (NV-01), Ilhan Omar (MN-05), Gabe Amo (RI-01), John Garamendi (CA-08), Sarah McBride (DE-00), Nanette Barragán (CA-44), Stephen Lynch (MA-08), Angie Craig (MN-02), Summer L. Lee (PA-12), Greg Casar (TX-35), Jan Schakowsky (IL-09), Chellie Pingree (ME-01), Gilbert R. Cisneros (CA-31), Maxine Dexter (OR-03), Jill Tokuda (HI-02), Salud Carbajal (CA-24), Emanuel Cleaver (MO-05), Steve Cohen (TN-09), Gregory W. Meeks (NY-05), Luz Rivas (CA-29), Brad Sherman (CA-32), Wesley Bell (MO-01), Brendan Boyle (PA-02), Ayanna Pressley (MA-07), Robin L. Kelly (IL-02), Frederica S. Wilson (FL-24), Ro Khanna (CA-17), Timothy M. Kennedy (NY-26), Troy Carter (LA-02), Zoe Lofgren (CA-18), Josh Gottheimer (NJ-05), Gabe Vasquez (NM-02), Ted W. Lieu (CA-36), Robert J. Menendez (NJ-08), Shontel M. Brown (OH-11), Sara Jacobs (CA-51), Jennifer L. McClellan (VA-04), Kevin Mullin (CA-15), Greg Stanton (AZ-04), Veronica Escobar (TX-16), Julie Johnson (TX-32), Brittany Pettersen (CO-07), Janelle S. Bynum (OR-05), Mikie Sherrill (NJ-11), Teresa Leger Fernandez (NM-03), Mark Takano(CA 39), Glenn Ivey (MD-04), Jerrold Nadler (NY-12), Pablo José Hernández (PR-00), Sam Liccardo (CA-16), Eric Swalwell (CA-14), Al Green (TX-09), Raul Ruiz (CA-25), Joaquin Castro (TX-20), Emily Randall (WA-06), Judy Chu (CA-28), Danny Davis (IL-07), Lauren Underwood (IL-14), Valerie Foushee (NC-04), Debbie Dingell (MI-06), Terri A. Sewell (AL-07), Laura Friedman (CA-30), Betty McCollum (MN-04), Morgan McGarvey (KY-03), Julia Brownley (CA-26), Marc Veasey (TX-33), Suzanne Bonamici (OR-01).

    The legislation also counts with the support of local and national organizations, including American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), National Immigration Law Center (NILC), Stop AAPI Hate, FWD.us, Center for American Progress (CAP), OCA-Asian Pacific American Advocates, National Immigrant Justice Center (NIJC), Japanese American Citizens League (JACL), Asian Americans Advancing Justice (AAJC), Illinois Coalition for Immigrant and Refugee Rights (ICIRR), Center for Law and Social Policy (CLASP), African Communities Together, Haitian Bridge Alliance, Immigration Hub, and UndocuBlack. 

    The Born in the USA Act is a companion to S.646, introduced in the Senate by Senator Jacky Rosen (D-NV). 

    Text of the bill, CLICK HERE. 

    BACKGROUND:

    On January 29, 2025, Donald Trump signed Executive Order 14160, Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship. The executive order illegally and unconstitutionally seeks to undermine the constitutional right to birthright citizenship. 

    The 14th Amendment guarantees that all people born in the U.S. are U.S. citizens. In the 1898 United States v. Wong Kim Ark case, the Supreme Court affirmed that the 14th Amendment protects the birthright citizenship of all children born in the country, including those from undocumented parents.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    May 16, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Russia: Marat Khusnullin held meetings with colleagues from foreign countries at the International Economic Forum “Russia – Islamic World: KazanForum”

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: Government of the Russian Federation – An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.

    Marat Khusnullin held a working meeting with Deputy Prime Minister of Afghanistan for Economic Affairs Abdul Ghani Baradar

    May 15, 2025

    Marat Khusnullin held a working meeting with Deputy Prime Minister of Afghanistan for Economic Affairs Abdul Ghani Baradar

    May 15, 2025

    Marat Khusnullin held a working meeting with Deputy Prime Minister of Afghanistan for Economic Affairs Abdul Ghani Baradar

    May 15, 2025

    Marat Khusnullin held a working meeting with the Minister of Privatization, Investment and Communications of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan Abdul Alim Khan

    May 15, 2025

    Marat Khusnullin held a working meeting with the Minister of Privatization, Investment and Communications of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan Abdul Alim Khan

    May 15, 2025

    Marat Khusnullin held a working meeting with the Minister of Privatization, Investment and Communications of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan Abdul Alim Khan

    May 15, 2025

    Previous news Next news

    Marat Khusnullin held a working meeting with Deputy Prime Minister of Afghanistan for Economic Affairs Abdul Ghani Baradar

    At the XVI International Economic Forum “Russia – Islamic World: KazanForum”, Deputy Prime Minister of Russia Marat Khusnullin held a number of working meetings with colleagues from foreign countries.

    In particular, a meeting was held with the Minister of Privatization, Investment and Communications of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, Abdul Alim Khan.

    “Pakistan is an important partner for our country in South Asia. Our relations with Islamabad are developing dynamically in almost all areas. I believe that they need to be further developed. One of the key issues is reliable and uninterrupted mutual settlements. Today, the share of non-Western currencies in the structure of bilateral settlements between Russia and Pakistan is already about 80%. This is a very good result. I hope that we will continue to work using the Russian financial messaging system and the Mir payment system,” the Deputy Prime Minister said.

    According to him, another important issue is related to transport corridors. Cargo transportation to Pakistan by road is developing. And here the importance of the international transport corridor “North-South” is growing.

    “Also a very important point is our cooperation within the SCO. I hope that we will be able to continue to effectively interact in this area. I am confident that this meeting and the participation of the Pakistani delegation in the forum will give a good impetus to the development of bilateral cooperation,” Marat Khusnullin emphasized.

    In addition, he held a working meeting with Deputy Prime Minister of Afghanistan for Economic Affairs Abdul Ghani Baradar. During the event, representatives of the Afghan delegation noted that their foreign policy is aimed at the economic development of the country, they are focused on cooperation, a potential direction of which could be trade and economic cooperation – projects in the field of agriculture, energy, transport infrastructure and mechanical engineering, mining industry.

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    MIL OSI Russia News –

    May 16, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Canada: Expanded CIC Indigenous Bursary Program Delivering more Supports for Post-Secondary Students Across Saskatchewan

    Source: Government of Canada regional news

    Released on May 15, 2025

    Crown Investments Corporation (CIC) now delivers financial support to more Indigenous post-secondary students in Saskatchewan than ever before. With the expansion of CIC’s Indigenous Bursary Program to most regional colleges and the Gabriel Dumont Institute (GDI), students in rural areas across the province can now gain better access to this educational funding close to their home communities.

    “The Indigenous Bursary Program is one of CIC’s direct efforts to advance economic reconciliation, through delivering more affordable access to training and education opportunities for Indigenous peoples in Saskatchewan,” Crown Investments Corporation Minister Jeremy Harrison said. “Increasing the participation of Indigenous talent in our Crown sector and all aspects of Saskatchewan’s economy is vital to our province’s continued growth.”

    The Indigenous Bursary Program had provided close to $2.2 million between 2018-19 and 2023-24 to financially support students at the University of Saskatchewan, University of Regina, Saskatchewan Polytechnic, Saskatchewan Indian Institute of Technologies (SIIT) and Lakeland College. Since its inception in 2004, more than 1,300 bursaries have been awarded to students.

    The expansion now includes Northlands College, Suncrest College, Southeast College, Great Plains College, North West College and GDI, which offer education opportunities across Saskatchewan’s rural communities and Tribal Council districts. In total, the program provides funding for 115 bursaries per year, valued at $5,000 each – a total annual investment of $575,000.

    “Long-standing partnerships with our donors have been essential in advancing equitable access to education,” Director of Advancement at SIIT Kendra Rowswell said. “Over the years, the bursaries provided by Crown Investments Corporation have significantly reduced financial barriers for Indigenous students, enabling them to pursue their educational goals. CIC’s continued generosity ensures that this impact will be felt for generations to come.” 

    “The Crown Investments Corporation’s Indigenous Bursary provided to the Gabriel Dumont Scholarship Foundation will help create opportunities for Métis students who are unable to access other sources of financial support, one of the major barriers to attending and achieving a higher education,” Gabriel Dumont Institute CEO Brett Vandale said. “In our community, education is the great equalizer!”

    Key program eligibility criterion include:

    • Be of self-declared Indigenous ancestry (includes Status First Nation, Non-Status First Nation, Métis or Inuit);
    • Be a Saskatchewan resident for at least the past 12 months;
    • Achieve satisfactory academic standing in post-secondary studies; and
    • Be registered full-time.  

    Visit: www.cicorp.sk.ca/bursaries-and-internships/indigenous-bursary-program for detailed program information.

    -30-

    For more information, contact:

    MIL OSI Canada News –

    May 16, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: PM: The world has paid the price for Putin’s aggression. He must now pay for avoiding peace.

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Press release

    PM: The world has paid the price for Putin’s aggression. He must now pay for avoiding peace.

    Piling the pressure on the Kremlin will be the focus of discussions at the European Political Community [EPC] today, after Putin dodged US arranged peace talks in Istanbul yesterday [Thursday].

    • Prime Minister to convene leaders at EPC to drive forward response to Putin’s stalling tactics

    • Russian energy expected to be central target in widespread sanctions action in the coming weeks if Russia does not agree a ceasefire

    • Comes as around 40 leaders meet at the European Political Community summit in Tirana today

    Piling the pressure on the Kremlin will be the focus of discussions at the European Political Community [EPC] today, after Putin dodged US arranged peace talks in Istanbul yesterday [Thursday].

    More than 40 leaders will attend the Tirana summit today, discussing shared challenges facing the continent and the threat to global stability and security posed by Putin.

    It comes after President Zelenskyy underscored Ukraine’s position as the party of peace and travelled to Turkey in good faith this week, in preparation for peace talks with Russia.

    But Putin failed to attend.

    Leaders are expected to reiterate calls for a full and unconditional ceasefire today and demand Russia prove that they are serious about bringing its invasion to an end. For more than two months, Russia has failed to substantively respond to the US’ calls for a full, unconditional 30-day ceasefire and genuine peace talks.

    Work has already begun on what further sanctions can be implemented to degrade Russia’s ability to prolong the war if Russia does not agree to a ceasefire.  Today, leaders are expected to progress the conversations held in Kyiv at the weekend about sanctions, with a focus on Russian energy revenues.

    Prime Minister Keir Starmer said:

    People in Ukraine and across the world have paid the price for Putin’s aggression in Ukraine and across Europe, now he must pay the price for avoiding peace.

    Putin’s tactics to dither and delay, while continuing to kill and cause bloodshed across Ukraine, is intolerable.

    For the past three years, Ukraine has been fighting for peace and security, while Russia has sent thousands of young men and women to their deaths and compromised global stability.

    Alongside the US and more than 30 other partners, we have been clear that we will not stand for Russia kicking a ceasefire down the road.

    A full, unconditional ceasefire must be agreed and if Russia is unwilling to come to the negotiating table, Putin must pay the price.

    During the summit, the Prime Minister is expected to lead a security roundtable with the Prime Minister of Sweden, Ulf Kristersson, as well as discussing with key partners including France, Germany, Italy, Poland and Ukraine latest efforts with the US to secure peace and an end of the bloodbath in Ukraine. It comes as Putin repeatedly ignored requests for peace talks in Istanbul this week.

    The Kremlin’s biggest source of tax revenue is oil exports, and with forecasts cut by almost a quarter because of Western sanctions and compounding slowing global growth prices, further measures are likely to cause significant pain. Oil and gas tax revenues were already a third lower in dollar terms 2024 than in 2022, the first year of the war; and they are already down by almost 20% year-on-year in February and March.

    The Prime Minister is clear that supporting Ukraine, and degrading Russia’s economy and ability to prolong the war as they wreak havoc across Europe, is vital to protecting national and Euro-Atlantic security, and delivering on the Government’s Plan for Change.

    Russian aggression is plain for all to see. Just this week the Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk revealed that the Russia Secret Service was behind a major blaze at a Polish shopping centre, while in a landmark decision, the International Civil Aviation Organisation ruled that the Russian Federation was behind the downing of Malaysian Airlines Flight MH17 in July 2014, killing 298 people, including 10 UK citizens.

    Last week, the Prime Minister announced the UK’s largest ever package of sanctions on Russia’s Shadow Fleet. The sanctions will apply further pressure on the Russian economy, which is stalling as Putin’s national wealth fund starts to run out, the non-defence sector is in recession and global oil prices are falling.

    Russia’s defence and security spending is now 40% of all federal spending and 8% GDP – a post-1990 high and double the size of federal social services spending.

    Share this page

    The following links open in a new tab

    • Share on Facebook (opens in new tab)
    • Share on Twitter (opens in new tab)

    Updates to this page

    Published 15 May 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom –

    May 16, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: SUNation Energy Announces 2025 First Quarter Results and Introduces Financial Guidance for 2025

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Substantial Progress in Reducing Debt, Lowering Costs, Enhancing Cash Flow
    Strong Commercial Project Backlog

    RONKONKOMA, N.Y., May 15, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — SUNation Energy, Inc. (Nasdaq: SUNE) (the “Company”), a leading provider of sustainable solar energy and backup power to households, businesses, municipalities, and for servicing existing systems, today announced financial results for the first quarter ended March 31, 2025 (“Q1 2025”). The information in this Press Release is not complete and should be carefully read in conjunction with our most recent Form 10-Q quarterly report for the financial quarter ended March 31, 2025, including the subsequent events and risk factor updated therein, as well as our other SEC reports.

    “Our results for Q1 2025 reflect the initial successes associated with our corporate transformation activities, most notably in the areas of cost containment, operating efficiencies, improved cash position, and debt reduction,” said Scott Maskin, Chief Executive Officer.

    “We see gathering strength in our end markets and are pleased with the performance of our two primary business segments – SUNation, which serves Long Island and the surrounding region, and Hawaii Energy Connection (“HEC”). SUNation’s Commercial backlog as of March 31, 2025 rose more than 30% compared to the same period last year, thanks to a variety of projects currently in various stages of development with our institutional partners. While our New York Residential business experienced typical seasonal headwinds in Q1 2025 due largely to especially poor weather in February, we are addressing pent up demand from Residential consumers. This has resulted in a stronger than usual Springtime push, with both contract and install activity rivaling the growth we saw during the post Inflation Reduction Act boom-period prior to the rise in interest and financing rates. We expect improved results in Q2 2025 compared to Q1 2025 as consumers look to lock in pricing prior to any potential increases related to tariffs and in advance of any changes to federal solar tax incentives that may occur as this issue gets debated in Congress. Based on 20 years of experience dealing with dynamic federal incentives, and now tariffs, I do believe that we are well-positioned to capitalize on this growing sense of urgency among consumers to begin to realize the benefits of solar.

    He continued, “We are also exploring opportunities to expand our Service and Maintenance business in the New York metro region to support thousands of homeowners whose systems have been orphaned by solar providers that are no longer in business. This presents a meaningful opportunity to broaden our customer base, support the continuing use of solar, and potentially benefit from historically high margin service revenues. Our Residential business in Hawaii, a more mature market, is expected to rebound from a sluggish 2024 due to solar and battery incentives that took effect in May 2025 thanks to recent action by the State of Hawaii’s Public Utilities Commission.”

    James Brennan, SUNation’s Chief Financial Officer, said, “The restructuring and debt reduction initiatives we have implemented over the last several quarters have simplified and strengthened our capital structure, significantly reduced monthly cash burn, enhanced cash flows, and stabilized our financial profile. Q1 2025 selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses declined by 9% from the first quarter of 2024 and interest expense decreased by 25%. We improved our cash position and lowered our debt by more than 50% from December 31, 2024.”

    Mr. Maskin concluded, “Although our business and industry are still recovering from a difficult period, we remain optimistic about 2025 and the long-term promise of solar energy. We have created a solid financial and operating platform, have maintained a sterling reputation among customers, and our team members are among the best in our industry. We are pursuing a variety of organic and acquisition-based initiatives that can expand our market reach, add scale to our business, and evolve our model into a one-stop shop for solar and storage related needs. For these reasons and more, we have the confidence to provide annual guidance for 2025.”

    Q1 2025 Financial Results Overview
    Comparisons are to the first quarter ended March 31, 2024 (“Q1 2024”) unless otherwise noted

    • Consolidated revenue declined by 4% to $12.6 million from $13.2 million. At SUNation, Commercial revenue rose 28%, which offset a 3% decline in Residential revenue due largely to seasonality, as well as lower Service revenue. At HEC, revenue declined by 11% to $3.1 million, which the Company believes is due largely to a lack of solar and battery incentives available in Q1 2025; these incentives once again became available May 15, 2025.
    • Gross profit was $4.4 million, or 35.1%, compared to gross profit of $4.8 million, or 36.4%, due primarily to lower total revenues.
    • SG&A expenses declined by 9% to $6.0 million from $6.6 million, the result of cost optimization and efficiency measures implemented in 2024.
    • Total operating expenses decreased by 5.6% to $6.6 million from $7.0 million.
    • Interest expense declined 25% to $0.6 million from $0.8 million, reflecting management’s commitment to the repayment and retirement of outstanding debt.
    • Net loss was $(3.5) million compared to net income of $1.2 million. Net income in Q1 2024 included $3.4 million of other income while net loss in Q1 2025 included other expenses of $(1.3) million.
    • Adjusted EBITDA was stable at $(1.5) million.

    Financial Condition March 31, 2025

    • Cash and cash equivalents rose to $1.4 million from $0.8 million at December 31, 2024, and restricted cash was stable at $0.3 million when compared to December 31, 2024.
    • Total debt, which includes earnout consideration of $2.1 million, declined 51% to $9.2 million from total debt of $19.1 million at December 31, 2024.
    • Accounts payable decreased by $1.5 million from December 31, 2024
    • Current liabilities decreased by $6.9 million from December 31, 2024
    • Long-term liabilities decreased by $0.7 million from December 31, 2024
    • Stockholders’ equity increased by $6.3 million from December 31, 2024

    Recent Financial Developments

    • Secured a total of $20 million in aggregate gross proceeds via a securities purchase agreement with certain institutional investors.
    • Eliminated $12.6 million of secured debt and other long-term contractual obligations that removed an average annual cash drain of approximately $3.4 million through 2027, which includes lowering annual interest expense for 2025 by an estimated $1.4 million.
    • Reduced 2025 SG&A spending by an estimated $2.0 million.
    • Paid in full a $2.5 million earn out payment associated with the November 2022 acquisition of SUNation Solar Systems, Inc. and five of its affiliated entities.
    • Restructured $5.5 million of long-term debt.
    • Entered into a new $1.0 million line of credit agreement with MBB Energy, LLC, which was unused as of May 15, 2025.
    • Signed separate Letters of Intent with Energy Systems Group, an award-winning energy services company, for the deployment of over 2.35 MWs of solar power at two school districts on Long Island.

    2025 FINANCIAL GUIDANCE

    Based on results for the first quarter of 2025, progress associated with our corporate transformation activities, and current business conditions and estimated outlook, the Company is providing the following financial guidance for the year ending December 31, 2025:

    • Total sales of $65 million to $70 million, a projected increase of between 14% and 23% from total sales of $56.9 million in 2024.
    • Adjusted EBITDA of $0.5 million to $0.7 million, an increase from an Adjusted EBITDA loss in 2024.

    Guidance for full year 2025 is based on the Company’s current views, beliefs, estimates and assumptions. It does not include any potential impact related to, among numerous other potential events that are largely out of our control, such as current or future tariffs, global disruptions, broader industry dynamics and trade policy changes, which the Company is unable to predict at this time. All financial expectations are forward-looking, and actual results may differ materially from such expectations, as further discussed below under the heading ” Forward-Looking Statements.”

    We are not able to provide a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA guidance for full year 2025 to net profit (loss), the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, because certain items that are excluded from Adjusted EBITDA but included in net profit (loss) cannot be predicted on a forward-looking basis without unreasonable effort or are not within our control.

    Q1 2025 CONFERENCE CALL

    Management will host a conference call on Friday, May 16, 2025 at 9:00 am ET. Interested parties may participate in the call by dialing:

    • Domestic: (800) 715-9871
    • International: (646) 307-1963
    • Passcode: 1430444

    The conference call will also be accessible via the Investor Relations section of the Company’s web site at https://ir.sunation.com/news-events or via this link: https://edge.media-server.com/mmc/p/6k6euqgi

    About SUNation Energy, Inc.

    SUNation Energy, Inc. is focused on growing leading local and regional solar, storage, and energy services companies nationwide. Our vision is to power the energy transition through grass-roots growth of solar electricity paired with battery storage. Our portfolio of brands (SUNation, Hawaii Energy Connection, E-Gear) provide homeowners and businesses of all sizes with an end-to-end product offering spanning solar, battery storage, and grid services. SUNation Energy, Inc.’s largest markets include New York, Florida, and Hawaii, and the company operates in three (3) states.

    Forward Looking Statements 

    Our prospects here at SUNation Energy Inc. are subject to uncertainties and risks. This news release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Act of 1934. The Company intends that such forward-looking statements be subject to the safe harbor provided by the foregoing Sections. These forward-looking statements are based largely on the expectations or forecasts of future events, can be affected by inaccurate assumptions, and are subject to various business risks and known and unknown uncertainties, a number of which are beyond the control of management. Therefore, actual results could differ materially from the forward-looking statements contained in this presentation. The Company cannot predict or determine after the fact what factors would cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by the forward-looking statements or other statements. The reader should consider statements that include the words “believes”, “expects”, “anticipates”, “intends”, “estimates”, “plans”, “projects”, “should”, or other expressions that are predictions of or indicate future events or trends, to be uncertain and forward-looking. We caution readers not to place undue reliance upon any such forward-looking statements. The Company does not undertake to publicly update or revise forward-looking statements, whether because of new information, future events or otherwise. Additional information respecting factors that could materially affect the Company and its operations are contained in the Company’s filings with the SEC which can be found on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

               
               
    SUNATION ENERGY, INC.
    CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
    (Unaudited)
               
    ASSETS
      March 31   December 31
      2025   2024
    CURRENT ASSETS:          
    Cash and cash equivalents $ 1,447,329     $ 839,268  
    Restricted cash and cash equivalents   292,901       312,080  
    Trade accounts receivable, less allowance for          
        credit losses of $215,738 and $240,817, respectively   3,927,676       4,881,094  
    Inventories, net   2,512,552       2,707,643  
    Related party receivables   23,739       23,471  
    Prepaid expenses   1,383,296       1,587,464  
    Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings   692,821       560,648  
    Other current assets   264,875       198,717  
    TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS   10,545,189       11,110,385  
    PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, net   1,164,610       1,238,898  
    OTHER ASSETS:          
    Goodwill   17,443,869       17,443,869  
    Operating lease right of use asset   3,600,546       3,686,747  
    Intangible assets, net   11,661,458       12,220,833  
    Other assets, net   12,000       12,000  
    TOTAL OTHER ASSETS   32,717,873       33,363,449  
    TOTAL ASSETS $ 44,427,672     $ 45,712,732  
    LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
    CURRENT LIABILITIES:          
    Accounts payable $ 6,514,331     $ 8,032,769  
    Accrued compensation and benefits   817,585       796,815  
    Operating lease liability   329,793       321,860  
    Accrued warranty   183,375       350,013  
    Other accrued liabilities   1,375,025       1,055,995  
    Accrued loss contingencies   342,216       1,300,000  
    Income taxes payable   19,686       5,071  
    Refundable customer deposits   1,426,398       1,870,173  
    Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings   298,173       444,310  
    Contingent value rights   292,901       312,080  
    Earnout consideration   2,110,896       2,500,000  
    Contingent forward contract   5,406,033       —  
    Current portion of loans payable   351,249       3,139,113  
    Current portion of loans payable – related party   806,154       6,951,563  
    Embedded derivative liability   —       82,281  
    TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES   20,273,815       27,162,043  
    LONG-TERM LIABILITIES:          
    Loans payable and related interest   1,248,397       6,531,650  
    Loans payable and related interest – related party   4,712,780       —  
    Operating lease liability   3,385,783       3,471,623  
    TOTAL LONG-TERM LIABILITIES   9,346,960       10,003,273  
    COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 6)          
    STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY          
    Series A Convertible preferred stock, par value $1.00 per share;
         3,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding, respectively
      —       —  
    Series D preferred stock, par value $1.00 per share;
         3,000,000 shares authorized; 1 and no shares issued and outstanding, respectively
      1       —  
    Common stock, par value $0.05 per share; 125,000 shares authorized;          
        81,391 and 9,343 shares issued and outstanding, respectively(1)   4,070       467  
    Additional paid-in capital(1)   61,198,304       51,445,995  
    Accumulated deficit   (46,395,478 )     (42,899,046 )
    TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY   14,806,897       8,547,416  
    TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY $ 44,427,672     $ 45,712,732  
               
    (1) Prior period results have been adjusted to reflect the reverse stock split of the common stock at a ratio of 1-for-200 that became effective April 21, 2025, the reverse stock split of the common stock at a ratio of 1-for-50 that became effective October 17, 2024 and the reverse stock split of the common stock at a ratio of 1-for-15 that became effective June 12, 2024. See Note 1, “Nature of Operations,” for further details.
     
                 
                 
    SUNATION ENERGY, INC.
    CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
    (Unaudited)
                 
      Three Months Ended March 31  
      2025   2024  
    Sales $ 12,636,638     $ 13,219,197    
    Cost of sales   8,205,313       8,413,749    
    Gross profit   4,431,325       4,805,448    
    Operating expenses:            
    Selling, general and administrative expenses   6,039,298       6,629,027    
    Amortization expense   559,375       709,375    
    Fair value remeasurement of SUNation earnout consideration   —       (350,000 )  
    Total operating expenses   6,598,673       6,988,402    
    Operating loss   (2,167,348 )     (2,182,954 )  
    Other (expense) income:            
    Investment and other income   48,165       45,841    
    Gain on sale of assets   —       6,118    
    Fair value remeasurement of warrant liability   —       3,728,593    
    Fair value remeasurement of contingent forward contract   109,492       —    
    Fair value remeasurement of contingent value rights   19,179       376,085    
    Financing fees   (576,594 )     —    
    Interest expense   (571,240 )     (764,870 )  
    Loss on debt extinguishment   (343,471 )     —    
    Other (expense) income, net   (1,314,469 )     3,391,767    
    Net (loss) income before income taxes   (3,481,817 )     1,208,813    
    Income tax expense   14,615       6,162    
    Net (loss) income   (3,496,432 )     1,202,651    
                 
    Deemed dividend on extinguishment of Convertible Preferred Stock   —       (751,125 )  
    Deemed dividend on modification of PIPE Warrants   —       (10,571,514 )  
    Net loss attributable to common shareholders $ (3,496,432 )   $ (10,119,988 )  
                 
                 
    Basic net loss per share(1) $ (106.71 )   $ (38,414.84 )  
    Diluted net loss per share(1) $ (106.71 )   $ (38,414.84 )  
                 
    Weighted Average Basic Shares Outstanding(1)   32,766       263    
    Weighted Average Dilutive Shares Outstanding(1)   32,766       263    
                 
    (1) Prior period results have been adjusted to reflect the reverse stock split of the common stock at a ratio of 1-for-200 that became effective April 21, 2025, the reverse stock split of the common stock at a ratio of 1-for-50 that became effective October 17, 2024 and the reverse stock split of the common stock at a ratio of 1-for-15 that became effective June 12, 2024. See Note 1, “Nature of Operations,” for further details.
     

    Non-GAAP Financial Measures
    This press release also includes non-GAAP financial measures that differ from financial measures calculated in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure provided in this release, and is net (loss) income calculated in accordance with GAAP, adjusted for interest, income taxes, depreciation, amortization, stock compensation, gain on sale of assets, financing fees, loss on debt remeasurement, and non-cash fair value remeasurement adjustments as detailed in the reconciliations presented below in this press release.

    These non-GAAP financial measures are presented because the Company believes they are useful indicators of its operating performance. Management uses these measures principally as measures of the Company’s operating performance and for planning purposes, including the preparation of the Company’s annual operating plan and financial projections. The Company believes these measures are useful to investors as supplemental information and because they are frequently used by analysts, investors, and other interested parties to evaluate companies in its industry. The Company also believes these non-GAAP financial measures are useful to its management and investors as a measure of comparative operating performance from period to period.

    The non-GAAP financial measures presented in this release should not be considered as an alternative to, or superior to, their respective GAAP financial measures, as measures of financial performance or cash flows from operations as a measure of liquidity, or any other performance measure derived in accordance with GAAP, and they should not be construed to imply that the Company’s future results will be unaffected by unusual or non-recurring items. In addition, these measures do not reflect certain cash requirements such as tax payments, debt service requirements, capital expenditures and certain other cash costs that may recur in the future. Adjusted EBITDA contains certain other limitations, including the failure to reflect our cash expenditures, cash requirements for working capital needs and cash costs to replace assets being depreciated and amortized. In evaluating non-GAAP financial measures, you should be aware that in the future the Company may incur expenses that are the same as or similar to some of the adjustments in this presentation. The Company’s presentation of non-GAAP financial measures should not be construed to imply that its future results will be unaffected by any such adjustments. Management compensates for these limitations by primarily relying on the Company’s GAAP results in addition to using non-GAAP financial measures on a supplemental basis. The Company’s definition of these non-GAAP financial measures is not necessarily comparable to other similarly titled captions of other companies due to different methods of calculation.

       
    SUNATION ENERGY, INC.
    RECONCILIATION OF GAAP NET (LOSS) INCOME TO ADJUSTED EBITDA
       
      Three Months Ended March 31
        2025       2024  
    Net (Loss) Income $ (3,496,432 )   $ 1,202,651  
    Interest expense   571,240       764,870  
    Interest income   (3,162 )     (21,555 )
    Income taxes   14,615       6,162  
    Depreciation   67,940       92,417  
    Amortization   559,375       709,375  
    Stock compensation   30,815       197,306  
    Gain on sale of assets   —       (6,118 )
    FV remeasurement of contingent value rights   (19,179 )     (376,085 )
    FV remeasurement of earnout consideration   —       (350,000 )
    FV remeasurement of warrant liability   —       (3,728,593 )
    FV remeasurement of contingent forward contract   (109,492 )     —  
    Financing fees   576,594       —  
    Loss on debt remeasurement   343,471       —  
    Adjusted EBITDA $ (1,464,215 )   $ (1,509,570 )

    The MIL Network –

    May 16, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Security: Additional 12 Defendants Charged in RICO Conspiracy for over $263 Million Cryptocurrency Thefts, Money Laundering, Home Break-Ins

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    WASHINGTON – A four-count superseding indictment, unsealed today in U.S. District Court, charges 12 additional people – Americans and foreign nationals – for allegedly participating in a cyber-enabled racketeering conspiracy throughout the United States and abroad that netted them more than $263 million. Several were arrested this week in California, while two remain abroad and are believed to be living in Dubai.

    The superseding indictment and the arrests were announced by U.S. Attorney Jeanine Ferris Pirro, FBI Special Agent in Charge Sean Ryan of the Washington Field Office Criminal and Cyber Division, and Executive Special Agent in Charge Kareem A. Carter of the Internal Revenue Service – Criminal Investigation Washington, D.C. Field Office.

    The defendants, listed below, face charges that include RICO conspiracy, conspiracy to commit wire fraud, money laundering, and obstruction of justice. The superseding indictment adds charges originally brought against Malone Lam on Sept. 19, 2024.

    According to the superseding indictment, the enterprise began no later than October 2023 and continued through March 2025. It grew from friendships developed on online gaming platforms.

    Members of the enterprise held different responsibilities. The various roles included database hackers, organizers, target identifiers, callers, money launderers, and residential burglars targeting hardware virtual currency wallets.

    Database hackers hacked websites and servers to obtain cryptocurrency-related databases or purchased databases on the darkweb. Organizers and target identifiers organized and collated information across the databases to determine the most valuable targets. Callers cold-called victims and used social engineering to convince them their accounts were the subject of cyberattacks and the enterprise callers were attempting to help secure their accounts. Money launderers received the stolen crypto currency and turned it into fiat U.S. currency in the form of bulk cash or wire transfers.

    According to the indictment, members and associates of the enterprise used the stolen virtual currency to purchase, among other things, nightclub services ranging up to $500,000 per evening, luxury handbags valued in the tens of thousands of dollars that were given away at nightclub parties, luxury watches valued between $100,000 and $500,000, luxury clothing valued in the tens of thousands of dollars, rental homes in Los Angeles, the Hamptons, and Miami, private jet rentals, a team of private security guards, and a fleet of at least 28 exotic cars ranging in value from $100,000 to $3.8 million.

    According to the indictment, members of the enterprise laundered stolen cryptocurrency proceeds by moving the funds through various mixers and exchanges using “peel chains,” pass-through wallets, and virtual private networks to mask their true identities. 

    The indictment alleges that in one instance on Aug. 18, 2024, Malone Lam and contacted a victim in D.C. and, through the communications with that victim, fraudulently obtained over 4,100 Bitcoin — worth over $230 million at the time. In another instance in July 2024, Malone Lam and others are accused of stealing over $14 million in cryptocurrency from an additional victim.

    The indictment alleges that members of the enterprise also committed home break-ins. As alleged in the Indictment, Marlon Ferro traveled to New Mexico in July 2024 and broke into a victim’s home to steal their hardware virtual currency wallet while Lam monitored the victim’s location by logging into his iCloud account.

    The superseding indictment also alleges that the enterprise engaged in significant money laundering activity. Kunal Mehta, Hamza Doost, Joel Cortez, and Evan Tangeman are alleged to have engaged in unlicensed crypto-to-cash services for the enterprise, obtained luxury rental homes for members of the enterprise using fake identity documents, booked private jet travel with stolen cryptocurrency for the enterprise, concealed ownership of exotic cars by registering them in shell company names, and shipped bulk cash through US mail to members of the enterprise hidden in squishmallow stuffed animals.

    Following his arrest in September 2024 and continuing while in pretrial detention, Lam is alleged to have continued working with members of the enterprise to pass and receive directions, collect stolen cryptocurrency, and to have enterprise members buy luxury Hermes Birkin bags and hand deliver them to his girlfriend in Miami, Florida.

    This ongoing investigation is being handled by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia, the FBI’s Washington Field Office, and the IRS-Criminal Investigation Washington D.C. Field Office. Significant investigative and operational support was provided by the FBI’s Los Angeles and Miami field offices.

    The matter is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Kevin Rosenberg, Acting Deputy Chief of the Fraud, Public Corruption, and Civil Rights Section of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia.

    If found guilty, the defendants’ sentences will be determined by the court based on the advisory Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors.

    An indictment is merely an allegation and all defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.

    Defendants

    NAME, AGE, & ALLEGED ROLE AKAs HOMETOWN CHARGES
    Malone Lam, 20, Social Engineering, Organizer “King Greavys,” “$$$,” “7,” “Kg,” “Anne Hathaway”

    Miami, Florida,

    Los Angeles, Calif.,

    Singapore

    RICO Conspiracy, Conspiracy to Commit Wire Fraud, Conspiracy to Launder Monetary Instruments
    Marlon Ferro, 19, Money Laundering, Residential Burglary “Marlo,” “GothFerrari” Santa Ana, California RICO Conspiracy, Conspiracy to Commit Wire Fraud, Conspiracy to Launder Monetary Instruments
    Hamza Doost, 21, Money Laundering “Scyllia” Hayward, California RICO Conspiracy, Conspiracy to Launder Monetary Instruments
    Conor Flansburg, 21,   Database Hacker, Caller, and Organizer “O O,” “Green Room,” “@d0uu0b” Newport Beach, California RICO Conspiracy, Conspiracy to Commit Wire Fraud
    Kunal Mehta, 45, Money Laundering “Papa,” “The Accountant,” “Shrek,” “Neil” Irvine, California RICO Conspiracy, Conspiracy to Launder Monetary Instruments
    Ethan Yarally, 18, Caller “Rand,” “15%” Richmond Hill, New York RICO Conspiracy, Conspiracy to Commit Wire Fraud
    Cody Demirtas, 19, Caller “KO,” “Kody” Stuart, Florida RICO Conspiracy, Conspiracy to Commit Wire Fraud
    Aakash Anand, 22, Caller, Money Laundering “Light,” “Dark” New Zealand RICO Conspiracy, Conspiracy to Commit Wire Fraud, Conspiracy to Launder Monetary Instruments
    Evan Tangeman, 21, Money Laundering “E,” “Tate,” “Evan | Exchanger” Newport Beach, California RICO Conspiracy, Conspiracy to Launder Monetary Instruments
    Joel Cortes, 21, Money Laundering “J” Laguna Niguel, California RICO Conspiracy, Conspiracy to Launder Monetary Instruments
    First Name Unknown-1 , Last Name Unknown-1, Database Hacker “Chen,” “Squiggly” Unknown RICO Conspiracy, Conspiracy to Commit Wire Fraud, Conspiracy to Launder Monetary Instruments
    First Name Unknown-2 , Last Name Unknown-2, Database Hacker “Danny” “Meech” Unknown RICO Conspiracy, Conspiracy to Commit Wire Fraud, Conspiracy to Launder Monetary Instruments
    John Tucker Desmond, 19, Destroyed Evidence

    –

    Huntington Beach, California Obstruction of Justice

    24cr417

    MIL Security OSI –

    May 16, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Security: Laotian National Arrested for Possessing a Firearm as a Convicted Felon and Possessing a Firearm as an Illegal Alien

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    CONCORD – A convicted felon from Laos was arrested this morning for the unlawful possession of a firearm, Acting U.S. Attorney Jay McCormack announces.

    Vongpasith Khamvongsa, 45, a Laotian national unlawfully residing in Somersworth, was indicted on charges of being an illegal alien in possession of a firearm and being a felon in possession of a firearm.  He appeared in federal court today.

    The charging statute provides a sentence of no greater than 15 years in prison, up to three years of supervised release, and a fine of up to $250,000. Sentences are imposed by a federal district court judge based upon the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and statutes which govern the determination of a sentence in a criminal case.

    The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms and Somersworth Police Department led the investigation.  Assistant U.S. Attorney Alexander S. Chen is prosecuting the case.

    This effort is part of Operation Take Back America, a nationwide initiative that marshals the full resources of the Department of Justice to repel the invasion of illegal immigration, achieve the total elimination of cartels and transnational criminal organizations (TCOs), and protect our communities from the perpetrators of violent crime. Operation Take Back America streamlines efforts and resources from the Department’s Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Forces (OCDETFs) and Project Safe Neighborhood (PSN).

    The details contained in the charging documents are allegations. The defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.

    ###

    MIL Security OSI –

    May 16, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Security: Tulsa Resident Pleads Guilty To Theft In Indian Country

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    MUSKOGEE, OKLAHOMA – The United States Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Oklahoma announced that Tommy Allen Winkler, age 37, of Tulsa, Oklahoma, entered a guilty plea to an Information of one count of Theft in Indian Country.

    The Information alleged that on November 16, 2022, and continuing until June 14, 2024, Winkler took and carried away, with intent to steal and purloin, money and personal property of three victims with a value exceeding $1,000.00.

    The crime occurred in Muskogee County, within the boundaries of the Muscogee (Creek) Nation Reservation, in the Eastern District of Oklahoma.

    The charge arose from an investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

    The Honorable D. Edward Snow, U.S. Magistrate Judge in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma, accepted the plea and ordered the completion of a presentence investigation report.

    A U.S. District Court Judge will determine the sentence to be imposed after considering the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors.

    Winkler was released on bond pending sentencing.

    Assistant U.S. Attorney Joshua Satter represented the United States.

    MIL Security OSI –

    May 16, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Primech AI Showcases Revolutionary HYTRON LITE Bathroom Cleaning Robot at Facilities Management Community of Practice Event in Singapore

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    SINGAPORE, May 15, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Primech AI Pte. Ltd. (“Primech AI” or the “Company”), a subsidiary of Primech Holdings Limited (Nasdaq: PMEC), participated in the Facilities Management Community of Practice (FM CoP) Session on Robotics co-organised by the Building and Construction Authority and JTC Corporation. The event at Temasek Polytechnic brought together industry leaders to explore innovative robotic solutions for the facilities management sector.

    Charles Ng, Co-Founder and Chief Operating Officer of Primech AI, delivered a presentation titled “Pioneering the Future of Robotics in Facilities Services,” highlighting the Company’s latest innovation, the HYTRON LITE bathroom cleaning robot. Powered by the NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano Super and designed specifically for compact bathroom environments, HYTRON LITE represents Primech AI’s commitment to addressing the unique challenges of urban facilities management.

    “We were honored to share our vision for the future of cleaning robotics with Singapore’s facilities management community,” said Ng. “The HYTRON LITE demonstrates our focus on creating purpose-built solutions that address real-world challenges in space-constrained environments. Our presentation explored not only the technical capabilities of our robots but also our market expansion strategies both in Singapore and internationally.”

    The FM CoP Session on Robotics featured a comprehensive program addressing key aspects of robotics implementation in the built environment:

    • Temasek Polytechnic presented real-world use cases and challenges faced when adopting robotic solutions
    • HOPE Technik discussed enabling infrastructure for robots in buildings and highlighted technical standards
    • Primech AI showcased the HYTRON LITE and discussed market expansion strategies
    • A live demonstration of HYTRON LITE provided attendees with a full appreciation of its capabilities

    The event highlighted Singapore’s position at the forefront of smart facility management innovation, with Primech AI playing a key role in advancing autonomous cleaning solutions. The Company’s participation underscored the growing importance of robotic solutions in addressing labor challenges and enhancing operational efficiency in the facilities management sector.

    “Events like the FM CoP Session are crucial for knowledge sharing and industry advancement,” added Ng. “We were delighted to demonstrate how our technological innovations can transform cleaning operations in facilities across Singapore and beyond.”

    The demonstration of the HYTRON LITE generated significant interest among the approximately 80-100 attendees, with many facilities managers expressing interest in the robot’s compact design and advanced AI capabilities. The live demonstration allowed participants to witness firsthand how the robot navigates tight spaces and performs cleaning tasks efficiently.

    About the Facilities Management Community of Practice (FM CoP)
    The Facilities Management Community of Practice (FM CoP) initiative by the Building and Construction Authority and JTC Corporation brings together professionals in the facilities management sector to share knowledge, experiences, and best practices. The FM CoP Sessions focus on specific topics relevant to advancing Singapore’s facilities management sector.

    About Primech AI
    Primech AI is a leading robotics company dedicated to pushing the boundaries of innovation in technology. With a team of passionate individuals and a commitment to collaboration, Primech AI is poised to revolutionize the robotics industry with groundbreaking solutions that make a meaningful impact on society. For more information, visit www.primech.ai.

    About Primech Holdings Limited
    Headquartered in Singapore, Primech Holdings Limited is a leading provider of comprehensive technology-driven facilities services, predominantly serving both public and private sectors throughout Singapore. Primech Holdings offers an extensive range of services tailored to meet the complex demands of its diverse clientele. Services include advanced general facility maintenance services, specialized cleaning solutions such as marble polishing and facade cleaning, meticulous stewarding services, and targeted cleaning services for offices and homes. Known for its commitment to sustainability and cutting-edge technology, Primech Holdings integrates eco-friendly practices and smart technology solutions to enhance operational efficiency and client satisfaction. This strategic approach positions Primech Holdings as a leader in the industry and a proactive contributor to advancing industry standards and practices in Singapore and beyond. For more information, visit www.primechholdings.com.    

    Forward-Looking Statements
    Certain statements in this announcement are forward-looking statements, including, for example, statements about completing the acquisition, anticipated revenues, growth, and expansion. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties and are based on the Company’s current expectations and projections about future events that the Company believes may affect its financial condition, results of operations, business strategy, and financial needs. These forward-looking statements are also based on assumptions regarding the Company’s present and future business strategies and the environment in which the Company will operate in the future. Investors can find many (but not all) of these statements by the use of words such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “aim,” “estimate,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “likely to” or other similar expressions. The Company undertakes no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent occurring events or circumstances or changes in its expectations, except as may be required by law. Although the Company believes that the expectations expressed in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, it cannot assure that such expectations will be correct. The Company cautions investors that actual results may differ materially from the anticipated results and encourages investors to review other factors that may affect its future results in the Company’s registration statement and other filings with the SEC.

    Company Contact:
    Email: ir@primech.com.sg

    Investor Relations Contact:        
    Matthew Abenante, IRC
    President                                        
    Strategic Investor Relations, LLC                                         
    Tel: 347-947-2093
    Email: matthew@strategic-ir.com

    The MIL Network –

    May 16, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Thomas Day State Historic Site Debuts New Tour Schedule

    Source: US State of North Carolina

    Headline: Thomas Day State Historic Site Debuts New Tour Schedule

    Thomas Day State Historic Site Debuts New Tour Schedule
    jejohnson6
    Thu, 05/15/2025 – 16:51

    Thomas Day State Historic Site is pleased to announce that starting May 13, the site will offer regularly scheduled walk-in tours to visitors for the first time. Previously, tours were available by advance reservation only. Acquired by the N.C. Division of State Historic Sites in 2024, the site is still under development and will continue to expand opportunities for the public to learn about the life and times of Thomas Day.

    Thomas Day State Historic Site is at 148 NC-57 in Milton, N.C.

    Guided tours will be available Tuesday-Saturday, at 10 and 11 a.m., noon, and 2 and 3 p.m. All tours will begin at the Thomas Day House. The tour fee is $2 for adults and $1 for children, seniors, and military. Groups of 10 or more who would like a tour should call or email the site in advance to schedule a visit.

    “Our staff has been working diligently behind the scenes for months to ready the site for this next stage,” said site manager DeAsia Noble. “We are thrilled that visitors to Milton can now drop in, take a tour, and learn about the remarkable life of Thomas Day.”

    About Thomas Day State Historic Site
    Thomas Day State Historic Site interprets the life and work of Thomas Day, a free Black master craftsman who was renowned for his skill and artistry in creating furniture in antebellum North Carolina. The site consists of Day’s house and workshop, as well as the Historic Milton State Bank building. The site is located at 148 NC-57 in Milton, N.C. For more information, visit https://historicsites.nc.gov/all-sites/thomas-day-state-historic-site or call (336) 592-8120.

    About the North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
    The N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources (DNCR) manages, promotes, and enhances the things that people love about North Carolina – its diverse arts and culture, rich history, and spectacular natural areas. Through its programs, the department enhances education, stimulates economic development, improves public health, expands accessibility, and strengthens community resiliency.

    The department manages over 100 locations across the state, including 27 historic sites, seven history museums, two art museums, five science museums, four aquariums, 35 state parks, four recreation areas, dozens of state trails and natural areas, the North Carolina Zoo, the State Library, the State Archives, the N.C. Arts Council, the African American Heritage Commission, the American Indian Heritage Commission, the State Historic Preservation Office, the Office of State Archaeology, the Highway Historical Markers program, the N.C. Land and Water Fund, and the Natural Heritage Program. For more information, please visit www.dncr.nc.gov.
    May 12, 2025

    MIL OSI USA News –

    May 16, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Future Waters Gallery Opens May 23 at NC Aquarium at Pine Knoll Shores

    Source: US State of North Carolina

    Headline: Future Waters Gallery Opens May 23 at NC Aquarium at Pine Knoll Shores

    Future Waters Gallery Opens May 23 at NC Aquarium at Pine Knoll Shores
    jejohnson6
    Thu, 05/15/2025 – 16:40

    PINE KNOLL SHORES

    The North Carolina Aquarium at Pine Knoll Shores announces the grand opening of its newly reimagined Future Waters gallery, opening to the public on May 23. After three years of meticulous planning, design, and construction, the gallery promises an immersive, hands-on experience that connects guests directly with the Aquarium’s conservation and sustainability efforts. The Aquarium is part of the N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources.

    The highly anticipated, brightly colored, comic-themed gallery is a transformative addition to the Aquarium’s visitor experience. The gallery features interactive exhibits, a 1,500-gallon saltwater coral reef habitat called Conservation Cove, and working labs that highlight the Aquarium’s sustainable aquaculture efforts and the Florida Reef Tract Rescue Project (FRTRP).

    “Before this gallery, much of our conservation work took place behind the scenes. This updated gallery now highlights these efforts and provides guests with interactive opportunities to experience these amazing ongoing conservation projects,” said Clint Taylor, NCAPKS director.

    The Future Waters gallery was made possible by a $240,808 grant from the Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS), the largest ever awarded to the North Carolina Aquariums by the IMLS.

    Interactive Learning
    At the heart of the gallery is a focus on education and future-focused conservation themes.

    The design features large-scale, sculptural coral reefs, a projection mapping interactive where visitors can touch icons that trigger comic-style animations explaining each step in the aquaculture process, videos that interpret coral restoration and aquaculture, interactive microscope, a 360-degree interactive video kiosk that puts guests underwater during coral restoration, and many other tactile components.

    The ACT Lab:
    A major highlight of the gallery is the Aquarium Conservation and Technology (ACT) Lab. The ACT Lab invites visitors to observe aquarists as they raise marine species from eggs laid within the Aquarium’s habitats.

    “Since initiating the aquaculture program across the NC Aquariums Division, the team has propagated over 23 different species collectively. Many of them have been shared with numerous facilities throughout the Association of Zoos and Aquariums (AZA) community through larval rearing programs and species survival plans,” Trent Boyette, NCAPKS husbandry curator.

    The Coral Lab:
    In the adjacent lab, guests can view live corals growing as part of the Florida Reef Tract Rescue Project (FRTRP). The FRTRP Lab in Future Waters will serve as a grow-out facility for endangered corals.

    Currently, there are approximately eight approved spawning facilities and over 20 grow-out facilities with increasing numbers of participants every year. The ultimate goal of the FRTRP is to spawn these corals, grow them up, and then return them to the Florida Keys in hopes of restoring the area’s coral reef.

    The new Future Waters gallery will open to the public on May 23. General admission and membership reservations can be made online in advance by visiting www.ncaquariums.com/pine-knoll-shores.

    About the North Carolina Aquarium at Pine Knoll Shores
    The North Carolina Aquarium at Pine Knoll Shores is five miles west of Atlantic Beach at 1 Roosevelt Blvd., Pine Knoll Shores, N.C. 28512. The Aquarium is open 9 a.m. – 5 p.m. daily. Its mission is to inspire the appreciation and conservation of North Carolina’s aquatic environments and animals. The Aquarium is under the North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources and is accredited by the Association of Zoos and Aquariums. For more information, please visit www.ncaquariums.com/pine-knoll-shores or call 252-247-4003.

    About the North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
    The N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources (DNCR) manages, promotes, and enhances the things that people love about North Carolina – its diverse arts and culture, rich history, and spectacular natural areas. Through its programs, the department enhances education, stimulates economic development, improves public health, expands accessibility, and strengthens community resiliency.

    The department manages over 100 locations across the state, including 27 historic sites, seven history museums, two art museums, five science museums, four aquariums, 35 state parks, four recreation areas, dozens of state trails and natural areas, the North Carolina Zoo, the State Library, the State Archives, the N.C. Arts Council, the African American Heritage Commission, the American Indian Heritage Commission, the State Historic Preservation Office, the Office of State Archaeology, the Highway Historical Markers program, the N.C. Land and Water Fund, and the Natural Heritage Program. For more information, please visit www.dncr.nc.gov.
    May 15, 2025

    MIL OSI USA News –

    May 16, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Terry Sanford to be Featured on N.C. Highway Historical Marker

    Source: US State of North Carolina

    Headline: Terry Sanford to be Featured on N.C. Highway Historical Marker

    Terry Sanford to be Featured on N.C. Highway Historical Marker
    jejohnson6
    Thu, 05/15/2025 – 16:47

    A man who served as governor, U.S. Senator and university president soon will be recognized with a North Carolina Highway Historical Marker. The N.C. Historical Marker Program is part of the N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources.

    The marker commemorating Terry Sanford will be unveiled Friday, May 23 at 11 a.m., during a roadside ceremony at the intersection of NC 751 and Science Drive in Durham.

    Sanford, who served as governor of North Carolina from 1961-65, also served his state and country in numerous roles throughout his public career.  

    Born Aug. 20, 1917, in Laurinburg, N.C., Sanford was the second of five children in a middle-class family. He attended Presbyterian Junior College (now St. Andrews Presbyterian College) and then the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, graduating from the latter in 1939. While at the UNC, Sanford met fellow student Margaret Rose Knight, whom he would marry in 1942, and the couple would have two children.

    Following graduation, Sanford entered the University of North Carolina School of Law. While continuing to study law, Sanford joined the Federal Bureau of Investigation in December 1941 and after training, he was assigned to duty in Ohio and Missouri. Following the entry of the United States into World War II, Sanford enlisted in the Army on the first anniversary of the attack on Pearl Harbor. He was assigned first to the 501st Parachute Infantry Regiment as a medic, and then to the 517th Parachute Infantry Regiment. In the latter regiment, he saw combat in Italy, southern France, and Belgium (the Battle of the Bulge).

    Following the war, Sanford reentered law school and graduated from the university in 1946. He was admitted to the state bar later in the year. Already entertaining ambitions to one day run for governor, he became assistant director of the University of North Carolina’s Institute of Government before becoming a full-time attorney in Fayetteville. He also served as a captain in the North Carolina Army National Guard.  

    A slow but steady rise in the Democratic Party of North Carolina and state government followed over the next few years, including a job in the North Carolina State Ports Authority, presidency of the North Carolina Young Democratic Clubs, state senator representing the 10th District, and campaign manager for former governor W. Kerr Scott’s successful 1954 run for the U.S. Senate, culminating with his successful run for governor in 1960.

    In December 1969, he was selected to be the new president of Duke University. Upon inauguration, he immediately ended a cap on the number of Jewish students who could be enrolled at the school. Facing a budget deficit and a small endowment, he worked to attract more students, increase enrollment, and increase annual donations. He also sought to improve relations between the student body and the administration, declaring opposition to the Vietnam War, supporting peaceful protest, and increasing student involvement in administration operations. He established the Institute of Policy Studies and Public Affairs, now the Sanford School of Public Policy.

    In 1986, Sanford was elected to the U.S. Senate. He supported efforts to bring about an end to the civil war in Nicaragua and created an International Commission for Central American Recovery and Development to promote regional development under the oversight of the Center for International Development Research at Duke University. As in the case of the North Carolina Fund, the commission would be funded by private philanthropy. The commission became informally known as the “Sanford Commission,” although he was not a member. He also participated in efforts to recruit Democratic candidates for the 1988 presidential election. He ran for reelection in 1992 but lost to Republican candidate Lauch Faircloth.

    Sanford devoted his remaining years to law and teaching at Duke. He died of cancer at home on April 18, 1998, and was interred at Duke Chapel.

    For more information about the historical marker, please visit  https://www.dncr.nc.gov/blog/2024/07/10/terry-sanford-1917-1998-g-144, or call (919) 814-6625  

    The Highway Historical Marker Program is a collaboration between the N.C. departments of Natural and Cultural Resources and Transportation.

    About the North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
    The N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources (DNCR) manages, promotes, and enhances the things that people love about North Carolina – its diverse arts and culture, rich history, and spectacular natural areas. Through its programs, the department enhances education, stimulates economic development, improves public health, expands accessibility, and strengthens community resiliency.

    The department manages over 100 locations across the state, including 27 historic sites, seven history museums, two art museums, five science museums, four aquariums, 35 state parks, four recreation areas, dozens of state trails and natural areas, the North Carolina Zoo, the State Library, the State Archives, the N.C. Arts Council, the African American Heritage Commission, the American Indian Heritage Commission, the State Historic Preservation Office, the Office of State Archaeology, the Highway Historical Markers program, the N.C. Land and Water Fund, and the Natural Heritage Program. For more information, please visit www.dncr.nc.gov.
    May 15, 2025

    MIL OSI USA News –

    May 16, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Welsbach Technology Metals Acquisition Corp. (“WTMA”) and Evolution Metals LLC (“EM”) Announce Effectiveness of SEC Registration Statement Ahead of Strategic Business Combination

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Chicago, IL and St. Louis, MO , May 15, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Welsbach Technology Metals Acquisition Corp. (OTC: WTMA), a publicly traded special purpose acquisition company, and Evolution Metals LLC, which is dedicated to developing a secure, reliable global supply chain for critical minerals and materials (CMM), today announced that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) has declared effective their registration statement on Form S-4, paving the way for the consummation of this previously- announced business combination.

    In connection with the business combination WTMA and EM plan to acquire 100% interest of five operating companies: (1) KCM Industry Co., Ltd., (2) NS World Co., Ltd., (3) KMMI INC., (4) Handa Lab Co., Ltd., and (5) Critical Mineral Recovery, Inc. Upon closing, the combined company will be renamed Evolution Metals & Technologies Corp. (“EM&T” or referred to in the Form S-4 as “New EM”), and expects to trade on Nasdaq under the symbol EMAT.

    EM&T’s business is to leverage advanced technologies such as robotics and artificial intelligence (AI) to provide integrated midstream and downstream CMM recycling and processing of oxides, metals, magnet alloys, battery materials, and rare earth magnets for key industries including, but not limited to, the automotive, aerospace, defense, healthcare, high tech, consumer electronics and appliances, and renewable energy industries, while driving a sustainable future.

    “This is an important step in our mission to build a Western critical materials champion,” said Daniel Mamadou, CEO of Welsbach Technology Metals Acquisition Corp. “It perfectly aligns with our original vision to bring together proven technologies, experienced operators, and strategic capital to solve one of the most urgent supply chain vulnerabilities in the Western world. EM&T is not just another company – we believe it is the platform that will deliver on what others have only promised.”

    David Wilcox, Managing Member of Evolution Metals LLC, added, “Today marks a transformative step toward American resilience in critical materials. This merger represents a direct response to the policy imperatives outlined by the U.S. government from reshoring strategic industries to securing CMM supply chains. The future of EM&T is built to execute on those priorities with speed and scale. “The immediate need for critical minerals and materials is mid-stream processing. Without the combined expertise of separation, salts for batteries, metals, alloys, metallics, sintered and bonded magnet-making capabilities under one Western roof, Chinese companies will continue to monopolize key steps in this supply chain, leaving all other nations and industries vulnerable. By integrating CMM recycling, processing, and advanced materials production, EM&T expects to be positioned to reduce dependence on China-controlled supply chains and strengthen America’s industrial and national security. EM&T plans to deliver real impact – environmentally, strategically, and economically.”

    About Welsbach Technology Metals Acquisition Corp.

    Welsbach Technology Metals Acquisition Corp. (OTC: WTMA) is a blank check company focused on identifying high-impact technology metals businesses aligned with global sustainability and security trends. One of WTMA’s co-sponsors, Welsbach Holdings Pte Ltd, is an independent platform focused on the support and development of projects related to technology metals and materials.

    About Evolution Metals LLC

    Evolution Metals LLC is committed to establishing a secure, robust and reliable supply chain for critical minerals & materials (CMM) that is 100% independent of China for sourcing or supplying feedstocks. EM’s strategy is to acquire and develop manufacturing, recycling and processing facilities to produce essential products (including magnets, battery feedstocks and related materials) for industrial uses such as, but not limited to, electric vehicles, electronics, environmental technologies and aerospace and defense applications. EM aims to support the creation of jobs, industry and manufacturing to promote a greener future by providing bespoke solutions to support its clients globally.

    Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

    Certain statements made in this press release are “forward looking statements” within the meaning of the “safe harbor” provisions of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. When used in this press release, the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “can,” “contemplate,” “continue,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “forecast,” “intend,” “may,” “might,” “outlook,” “plan,” “possible,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “seek,” “should,” “strive,” “target,” “will,” “would” and similar expressions may identify forward-looking statements, but the absence of these words does not mean that a statement is not forward-looking . The forward-looking statements are based on the current expectations and beliefs of the management of WTMA and EM, as applicable, and are inherently subject to uncertainties and changes in circumstances and their potential effects and speak only as of the date of such statement. There can be no assurance that future developments will be those that have been anticipated. These forward-looking statements involve a number of risks, uncertainties or other assumptions that may cause actual results or performance to be materially different from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, those discussed and identified in public filings made with the SEC by WTMA and the following: WTMA’s ability to complete the proposed Business Combination or, if WTMA does not consummate such proposed Business Combination, any other initial business combination; the risk that the consummation of the proposed Business Combination is significantly delayed; the ability to recognize the anticipated benefits of the proposed Business Combination; the risk that the announcement and consummation of the proposed Business Combination disrupts EM’s current plans; New EM’s ability to successfully integrate the business and operations of the target companies (the “Target Companies”) into its ongoing business operations and realize the intended benefits of New EM’s acquisition of the Target Companies; New EM’s ability to secure sufficient funding to successfully rebuild Critical Mineral Recovery Inc.’s recycling facility with significant expansion on management’s expected timeline and budget, or at all; unexpected costs related to the proposed Business Combination; expectations regarding New EM’s strategies and future financial performance, including future business plans, expansion and acquisition plans or objectives, prospective performance and opportunities and competitors, revenues, products and services, pricing, operating expenses, product and service acceptance, market trends, liquidity, cash flows and uses of cash, capital expenditures, and New EM’s ability to invest in growth initiatives; satisfaction or waiver (if applicable) of the conditions to the proposed Business Combination, including, among other things: (i) approval of the proposed Business Combination and related agreements and transactions by the WTMA stockholders, the holder of the EM member units and the holders of the equity interests of the other Target Companies, (ii) receipt of approval for listing on Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (“Nasdaq”) the shares of WTMA common stock to be issued in connection with the Business Combination, and (iii) the absence of any injunctions; that the amount of cash available in the trust account and from certain other investments is at least equal to the minimum available cash condition amount, after giving effect to redemptions by WTMA stockholders and certain transaction expenses; the occurrence of any other event, change or other circumstances that could give rise to the termination of the Merger Agreement; the implementation, market acceptance and success of New EM’s business model and growth strategy; the ability to obtain or maintain the listing of New EM’s common stock on Nasdaq following the proposed Business Combination; limited liquidity and trading of WTMA’s public securities; the amount of any redemptions by existing holders of WTMA common stock being greater than expected; WTMA’s ability to raise financing in the future; WTMA’s success in retaining or recruiting, or changes required in, New EM’s officers, key employees or directors following the completion of the proposed Business Combination; WTMA officers and directors allocating their time to other businesses and potentially having conflicts of interest with WTMA’s business or in approving the proposed Business Combination; the use of proceeds not held in the trust account or available to WTMA from interest income on the trust account balance; the impact of the regulatory environment and complexities with compliance related to such environment, including New EM’s ability to meet, and continue to meet, applicable regulatory requirements; New EM’s ability to execute its business plan, including with respect to its technical development and commercialization of products, and its growth and go-to-market strategies; New EM’s ability to achieve sustained, long-term profitability and commercial success; operational risks, including with respect to New EM’s use of agents or resellers in certain jurisdictions, New EM’s ability to scale up its manufacturing quantities of its products, New EM’s outsourcing of manufacturing and such manufacturers’ ability to satisfy New EM’s manufacturing needs on a timely basis, the availability of components or raw materials used to manufacture New EM’s products and New EM’s ability to process customer order backlog; New EM’s revenue deriving from a limited number of customers; geopolitical risk and changes in applicable laws or regulations, including with respect to New EM’s planned operations outside of the U.S. and Korea; New EM’s ability to attract and retain talented personnel; New EM’s ability to compete with companies that have significantly more resources; New EM’s ability to meet certain certification and compliance standards; New EM’s ability to protect its intellectual property rights and ability to protect itself against potential intellectual property infringement claims; the outcome of any known and unknown litigation and regulatory proceedings, including any proceedings that may be instituted against WTMA or EM following announcement of the proposed Business Combination; the potential characterization of New EM as an investment company subject to the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended; and other factors detailed under the section entitled “Risk Factors” in the Registration Statement on Form S 4, initially filed with the SEC on November 12, 2024, as amended (the “Registration Statement”). Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize or should any of the assumptions made by the management of WTMA, EM and the other Target Companies prove incorrect, actual results may vary in material respects from those projected in these forward-looking statements. Except to the extent required by applicable law or regulation, WTMA, EM and the other Target Companies undertake no obligation to update these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this press release or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

    Additional Information and Where to Find It

    WTMA has filed the Registration Statement with the SEC, which was declared effective by the SEC on May 14, 2025. The Registration Statement includes a document that serves as a proxy statement and prospectus of WTMA, referred to as a “proxy statement/prospectus,” containing information about the proposed Business Combination and the respective businesses of WTMA, EM and the Target Companies. WTMA will mail a definitive proxy statement/prospectus and other relevant documents to WTMA stockholders. WTMA stockholders are urged to read the preliminary proxy statement/prospectus and any amendments thereto and, when available, the definitive proxy statement/prospectus in connection with the solicitation of proxies for the special meeting to be held to approve the proposed Business Combination, because these documents will contain important information about WTMA, EM, the other Target Companies and the proposed Business Combination. The definitive proxy statement/prospectus will be mailed to stockholders of WTMA as of a record date established for voting on the proposed Business Combination. Stockholders of WTMA will also be able to obtain a free copy of the proxy statement/prospectus, as well as other filings containing information about WTMA without charge, at the SEC’s website (www.sec.gov). Copies of the proxy statement/prospectus and WTMA’s other filings with the SEC can also be obtained, without charge, by directing a request to: chris@welsbach.sg. The information contained in, or that can be accessed through, WTMA’s website is not incorporated by reference in, and is not part of, this press release.

    No Offer or Solicitation

    This press release does not constitute (i) a solicitation of a proxy, consent, or authorization with respect to any securities or in respect of the proposed Business Combination, or (ii) an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any securities, or a solicitation of any vote or approval, nor shall there be any sale of securities in any jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation, or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of any such jurisdiction. No offering of securities shall be made except by means of a definitive offering document.

    Participants in the Solicitation

    WTMA and EM and their respective directors and officers or managers and other members of management and employees may be deemed participants in the solicitation of proxies in connection with the proposed Business Combination. WTMA stockholders and other interested persons may obtain, without charge, more detailed information regarding directors and officers of WTMA in WTMA’s proxy statement/prospectus. Information regarding the persons who may, under SEC rules, be deemed participants in the solicitation of proxies from WTMA’s stockholders in connection with the proposed Business Combination will be included in the proxy statement/prospectus that WTMA intends to file with the SEC.

    Investor & Media Contacts

    Judith McGarry
    Evolution Metals LLC
    Tel: +1 (415) 971-2900
    Email: judith.mcgarry@evolution-metals.com

    Daniel Mamadou
    Chief Executive Officer
    Welsbach Technology Metals Acquisition Corp.
    Tel: +1 (251) 280-1980
    Email: daniel@welsbach.sg

    Private Investment in Public Equity (“PIPE”)
    Email: PIPE@Evolution-Metals.com

    The MIL Network –

    May 16, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Trust Stamp files its 2025 Q1 10-Q and provides forward-looking estimates

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Atlanta, GA, May 15, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Trust Stamp announced that:

    1. It filed its Q1 10-Q report for the three months ended 31 March 2025 after the Nasdaq market closed on May 15th, 2025.
    2. Q1 2025 recognized revenue was $545 thousand, decreased from $574 thousand for Q1 of 2024, with an additional $197 thousand of revenue fully earned but subject to deferred recognition under ASC 606.
    3. Estimates of anticipated revenue from existing contracted customers for FY 2025 are believed to exceed $5.0m and do not include projected revenue from contracted customers that are not yet revenue-generating.
    1. Continuing expense reductions for the balance of 2025 are estimated to result in new savings of $0.18m per month compared to expenses in 2024.
    1. Cash burn for the remaining nine months of 2025 is estimated at an average of $0.24m per month based solely on projected revenue from contracted customers that are currently revenue-generating. The Company believes its projected burn is covered by cash on hand (supplemented by an unused $6.1m “At The Market” equity distribution agreement that was announced on February 25th, 2025) as well as anticipated revenues described above.

    In addition, Trust Stamp announced that as of the date of this release, institutional customers registered on the Orchestration Layer platform have increased to ninety-four from eighty at the end of Q4 2024, with the addition of twelve community banks and two credit unions. 

    Inquiries:
    Trust Stamp                                                   Email: Shareholders@truststamp.ai 

    About Trust Stamp

    Trust Stamp is a global provider of AI-powered services for use in multiple sectors including banking and finance, regulatory compliance, government, healthcare, real estate, communications, and humanitarian services. Its technology empowers organizations via advanced solutions that reduce fraud, tokenize and secure data, securely authenticate users while protecting personal privacy, reduce friction in digital transactions, and increase operational efficiency, enabling customers to accelerate secure financial inclusion and reach and serve a broader base of users worldwide.

    With team members from twenty-two nationalities in eight countries across North America, Europe, Asia, and Africa, Trust Stamp trades on the Nasdaq Capital Market (Nasdaq: IDAI).

    Safe Harbor Statement: Caution Concerning Forward-Looking Remarks 

    All statements in this release that are not based on historical fact are “forward-looking statements” including within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and the provisions of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The information in this announcement may contain forward-looking statements and information related to, among other things, the company, its business plan and strategy, and its industry. These statements reflect management’s current views with respect to future events based on information currently available and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause the company’s actual results to differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements. Investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date on which they are made. The company does not undertake any obligation to revise or update these statements.

    The MIL Network –

    May 16, 2025
  • MIL-Evening Report: This election, young people held the most political power. Here’s how they voted

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Intifar Chowdhury, Lecturer in Government, Flinders University

    This election, a lot of focus was directed at young voters. With Millennials and Gen Z now making up a larger share of the electorate than Baby Boomers, this was deserved.

    But for all the attempts to reach these cohorts, whether through TikTok, influencers or podcasts, how did they actually vote?

    Preliminary analysis of electorates with high shares of young people suggests the youth vote was complex and nuanced. The voting bloc continued its unpredictability, with support fragmented across parties, candidates and age groups.

    Analysing voting patterns

    On May 9, I analysed the Australian Electoral Commission’s (AEC) electoral division results alongside youth enrolment statistics, to explore how the youngest electorates voted.

    Rather than treating voters aged 18–44 as a single, homogeneous bloc, I separated them into Gen Z (aged 18–29) and Millennial (aged 30–44) categories. Evidence suggests that generation is more useful for analysis than age alone.

    Electorates with higher shares of young people tended to favour the left, particularly Labor. Even in Liberal-held seats that didn’t change hands, there were clear swings against the Coalition.

    Of course, electoral outcomes are shaped by more than age or generational factors. Seat-level voting reflects a complex mix of influences.

    But while we await individual-level public opinion data, the best available insights come from examining electoral division characteristics using Australian Bureau of Statistics 2021 Census data.

    What happened?

    Surprisingly, the Greens lost three of the country’s most youth-concentrated electorates: Melbourne, Brisbane and Griffith.

    In Melbourne – still the electorate with the highest share of Gen Z voters – the Greens retained the largest primary vote, but lost the seat on preferences.

    However, in Griffith, Labor had a higher primary vote, while in Brisbane, both major parties outpolled the Greens.

    These electorates also have high percentages of renters, public servants, and residents earning above $90,000 a year – demographics that did not necessarily advantage the Greens. In fact, higher-income areas showed a slight lean towards the Liberals.

    Other electorates with large youth shares also showed interesting dynamics. In La Trobe and Lindsay, both held by the Liberals but with growing shares of Millennials and renters, there were swings against the party.

    Labor experienced swings against them in seats such as Solomon, Wills and Pearce.

    Wills maintained a strong Greens primary vote, while Solomon recorded a significant independent vote. This is consistent with high shares of renters, public servants against the Coalition and tertiary-educated women, who are more likely to support minor parties and independents.

    These patterns suggest a quiet divergence between Millennial and Gen Z voters. Millennials, while more likely than older generations to support progressive parties like Labor and, to a lesser extent, the Greens, do not show the same enthusiasm for independents. This indicates Millennials remain more aligned with traditional party politics.

    In contrast, Gen Z voters appear more willing to abandon major parties altogether. This is a generational difference in values and political socialisation, but also a broader shift toward issue-based, campaign-sensitive, less predictable polling.

    A fragmented young electorate

    Even when we take into account the demographic makeup of seats, for a deeper analysis, disentangling the effects of overlapping factors is important. For example, as researcher Nicholas Biddle points out, age and renting are often correlated, so which variable is doing the explanatory work? Is it youth itself, housing tenure, or something else entirely? I dug deeper.

    This further exploration revealed housing and employment factors played a role, even when we account for generational differences.

    Electorates with high shares of renters were significantly more likely to support Labor and less likely to vote Liberal. Public-sector workers leaned clearly towards Labor and away from the Coalition.

    Meanwhile, higher-income electorates (earning more than $90,000 a year) showed a slight, but not statistically significant, movement toward the Liberals and independents, and away from Labor and the Greens.

    Electorates with a larger share of overseas-born residents also leaned modestly toward Labor, likely reflecting swings in areas with significant Chinese populations.

    It’s difficult to know much about gender yet as we don’t have access to the right data. But we can find the intersecting effect of gender with other variables, such as higher education.

    This revealed one of the most striking findings: the strongest positive predictor of a Greens or independent vote, removing all other variables, was the share of university-educated women. These voters consistently turned away from both major parties.

    By contrast, electorates with more tertiary-educated people overall, but not specifically women, were more likely to stick with the major parties.

    With younger generations containing more university-educated women than ever before, this is sobering news for both Labor and the Liberals.

    Big takeaways

    One mistake we keep making is treating the youth vote as a single bloc. This election reminds us there are two generations within the youth base.

    Gen Z are still in their political formative years and they’re showing signs of drifting further from the major parties.

    But Millennials, while still firmly left-leaning, seem to remain anchored to the two-party system.

    Perhaps it’s a sign of political “adulting” – a recognition that minor parties and independents can struggle to wield power in the lower house.

    Labor can still bank on Millennials, for now. But Gen Z, especially those who are highly educated, are the cohort to watch. They’re less loyal, and far less convinced that the traditional party structure speaks to them.

    There’s no way to sugarcoat it for the Liberals: there’s no good news here in their current form.

    But no party can get complacent.

    The modern Australian electorate may lean left overall, but it’s also increasingly disillusioned with the majors. Preferential voting may mask this shift, but it doesn’t halt it.

    The Greens, meanwhile, also have some soul-searching to do. Their campaign didn’t collapse, but their primary vote stalled.

    To become a serious third party in the House of Representatives, the Greens must grow their primary vote and find a way to hold onto their volatile, youthful base as it ages.

    Intifar Chowdhury does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    – ref. This election, young people held the most political power. Here’s how they voted – https://theconversation.com/this-election-young-people-held-the-most-political-power-heres-how-they-voted-255769

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

    May 16, 2025
  • MIL-Evening Report: Banning young people from social media sounds like a silver bullet. Global evidence suggests otherwise

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Jasleen Chhabra, Research Fellow, Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne

    Monkey Business / Shutterstock

    Around 98% of Australian 15-year-olds use social media. Platforms such as TikTok, Snapchat and Instagram are where young people connect with friends and online communities, explore and express their identities, seek information, and find support for mental health struggles.

    However, the federal government, seeking to address concerns about young people’s mental health, has committed to ban under-16s from these platforms from later this year.

    There is no doubt social media presents risks to young people. These include cyberbullying, posts related to disordered eating or self-harm, hate speech, and the basic risk of spending long hours scrolling or “doomscrolling”.

    But is banning young people really the answer? We reviewed 70 reports from experts in Australia, the United Kingdom, the United States and Canada to understand what they recommend – and found broad agreement that a ban may not address the real problems.

    Humans preventing harm

    The overall verdict is that we need a much more thoughtful response than just a ban: only a coordinated approach between governments, regulators, tech companies and young people themselves will address youth mental health and online safety.

    We should be asking what we can do to make online spaces safer for young people, not jumping straight to removing them entirely.

    Content moderation is one area in need of urgent attention. Young people regularly report being exposed to harmful and age-inappropriate content on social media, while platforms replace moderation staff with cheaper AI systems.

    Automated processes have their place, but many recommendations in our review emphasised the importance of human moderators to keep up.

    Data and endless advertising

    A second issue exists around the collection and use of user data. Tech platforms have built their business model around user engagement and ad revenue.

    To keep users scrolling (and watching ads), companies collect large amounts of user data to deliver highly personalised feeds.

    Many experts advocate against the widespread collection and use of young people’s data, particularly for delivering advertising materials that promote dieting, unregulated supplements and cosmetic procedures. Posts like these often appear in an endless stream, interspersed between non-harmful and entertaining content.

    Starting with safety

    Alongside greater regulation of advertising material, many experts emphasised the need to consider “safety by design”.

    In other words, social media should be designed from the outset to prevent harming users. It may mean the end of “addictive” features such as infinite scrolling, frequent push notifications, and auto-play videos.

    Regulators also need the tools and power to hold platforms to account.

    That includes financial penalties, more transparent reporting from big tech companies, and taking proactive steps to keep harmful material off these platforms – not just taking down content after the fact.

    Age-checking tech troubles

    Our review did find a small number of reports that recommend barring young people from social media. However, experts questioned the feasibility of age verification technology and raised privacy concerns.

    The federal government has passed the buck to social media companies for actually implementing age verification of users.

    Platforms must take “reasonable steps” to restrict access by under-16s. It is unclear what these steps will be, but the prospect of facial recognition or digital ID checks raises serious privacy concerns.

    Others argue that banning under-16s from social media will drive them to less regulated online spaces, including online forums such as the notorious 4Chan, where some pages have an explicit “no rules” policy.

    It is also important to acknowledge that many young people find important support and communities on social media. Taking away social media may present risks to mental health in these circumstances.

    Listening to young people

    An age ban sounds decisive but comes with its own set of questions.

    In the absence of social media, where do young people questioning their sexual or gender identity go to find information and support? What would a ban mean for young people who engage with news on social media?

    There is little evidence about what impact a ban will have on young people, particularly those from diverse backgrounds.

    What’s more, young people have had minimal input into the policy. They have the insight to offer practical, real-world insights into what works and what does not.

    A blanket ban does nothing to make social media platforms safer for users. It might just delay problems and expose young people to an avalanche of harm when they log on at the age of 16.

    A ban brings its own risks

    The push to ban social media for under-16s is driven by genuine concerns. But unless it is a part of a broader, more thoughtful approach to online safety, it risks doing more harm than good.

    If we want a healthier digital environment, we can’t just lock out young people and hope for the best.

    Vita Pilkington receives funding from the Melbourne Research Scholarship and the Margaret Cohan Research Scholarship, both awarded by the University of Melbourne.

    Zac Seidler has been awarded an NHMRC Investigator Grant. He is also the Global Director of Research with the Movember Institute of Men’s Health. He advises government on men’s health, masculinities, violence prevention and social media policy.

    Jasleen Chhabra does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    – ref. Banning young people from social media sounds like a silver bullet. Global evidence suggests otherwise – https://theconversation.com/banning-young-people-from-social-media-sounds-like-a-silver-bullet-global-evidence-suggests-otherwise-256587

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

    May 16, 2025
  • MIL-Evening Report: A trial is testing ways to enforce Australia’s under-16s social media ban. But the tech is flawed

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Alexia Maddox, Senior Lecturer in Pedagogy and Education Futures, La Trobe University

    De Visu/Shutterstock

    Australia’s move to ban under-16s from social media is receiving widespread praise. Other countries, including the United Kingdom, Ireland, Singapore and Japan, are also now reportedly considering similar moves.

    The ban was legislated in November 2024 and is due to take effect in December 2025. The law says social media platforms can’t use official IDs such as passports to check Australian users’ ages, and shouldn’t track Australians. But it doesn’t specify the alternative.

    To test alternative methods, the federal government commissioned a trial of currently available technologies designed to “assure” people’s age online. Run by the Age Check Certification Scheme, a UK-based company specialising in testing and certifying identity verification systems, the trial is in its final stages. Results are expected at the end of June.

    So what are the technologies being trialled? Are they likely to work? And how might they – and the social media ban itself – alter the relationship all of us have with our dominant forms of digital communication?

    Dead ends for age verification

    Age verification confirms a person’s exact age using verified sources such as government-issued IDs. Age assurance is a broader term. It can include estimation techniques such as analysing faces or metadata to determine if users meet age requirements.

    In 2023 the federal government rejected mandating verification technologies for age-gating pornography sites. It found them “immature” with significant limitations. For example, database checks were costly and credit card verification could be easily worked around by minors.

    Nonprofit organisation Digital Rights Watch also pointed out that such systems were easily bypassed using virtual private networks – or VPNs. These are simple tools that hide a user’s location to make it seem like they are from a different country.

    Age assurance technologies bring different problems.

    For example, the latest US National Academies of Sciences report shows that facial recognition systems frequently misidentify children because their facial features are still developing.

    Improving these systems would require massive collections of children’s facial images. But international human rights law protects children’s privacy, making such data collection both legally and ethically problematic.

    Flawed testing of innovative tech?

    The age assurance technology trial currently includes 53 vendors hoping to win a contract for new innovative solutions.

    A range of technology is being trialled. It includes facial recognition offering “selfie-based age checks” and hand movement recognition technologies that claim to calculate age ranges. It also includes bespoke block chains to store sensitive data on.

    There are internal tensions about the trial’s design choices. These tensions centre on a lack of focus on ways to circumvent the technology, privacy implications, and verification of vendors’ efficacy claims.

    While testing innovation is good, the majority of companies and startups such as IDVerse, AgeCheck, and Yoti in the trial, will likely not hold clout over the major tech platforms in focus (Meta, Google and Snap).

    This divide reveals a fundamental problem: the companies building the checking tools aren’t the ones who must use them in the platforms targeted by the law. When tech giants don’t actively participate in developing solutions, they’re more likely to resist implementing them later.

    Google recently proposed storing ID documents in Google Wallet for age verification.
    nitpicker/Shutterstock

    Unresponsive tech companies

    Some major tech companies have shown little interest in engaging with the trial. For example, minutes from the trial’s March advisory board meeting reveal Apple “has been unresponsive, despite multiple outreach attempts”.

    Apple has recently outlined a tool to transmit a declared age range to developers on request. Apple suggests iOS will default the age assurance on Apple devices to under 13 for kids’ accounts. This makes it the responsibility of parents to modify age, the responsibility of developers to recognise age, and the responsibility of governments to legislate when and what to do with an assured age per market.

    Google’s recent Google Wallet proposal for age assurance also misses the mark on privacy concerns and usefulness.

    The proposal would require people over 16 to upload government-issued IDs and link them to a Google account. It would also require people trust Google not track where they go across the internet, via a privacy-preserving technology that remains a promise.

    Crucially, Meta’s social media platforms such as Facebook and Instagram also do not let you login with Google credentials. After all, they are competitors. This raises questions about the usefulness of Google’s proposal to assure age across social media platforms as part of the government’s under-16s ban.

    Meanwhile, Google is also suggesting AI chatbots should be directly targeted and available to children under 13, creating something akin to a “social network of one”, which are out of scope of the ban.

    Rather than engage with Australian age verification systems, companies such as Apple and Google are promoting their own solutions which seem to prioritise keeping or adding users to their services, or passing responsibility elsewhere.

    For the targeted platforms that enable online social interactions, delay in engagement fits a broader pattern. For example, in January 2025, Mark Zuckerberg indicated Meta would push back more aggressively against international regulations that threaten its business model.

    A shift in internet regulation

    Australia’s approach to banning under-16s from using social media marks a significant shift in internet regulation. Rather than age-gating specific content such as porn or gambling, Australia is now targeting basic communication infrastructure – which is what social media have become.

    It centres the problem on children being children, rather than on social media business models.

    The result is limiting childrens’ digital rights with experimental technologies while doing little to address the source of perceived harm for all of us. It prioritises protection without considering children’s rights to access information and express themselves. This risks leaving the most vulnerable children being cut off from digital spaces essential to their success.

    Australia’s approach puts paternal politics ahead of technical and social reality. As we get closer to the ban taking effect, we’ll see how this approach to regulate social communication platforms offers young people respite from the platforms their parents fear – yet continue to use everyday for their own basic communication needs.

    The authors do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    – ref. A trial is testing ways to enforce Australia’s under-16s social media ban. But the tech is flawed – https://theconversation.com/a-trial-is-testing-ways-to-enforce-australias-under-16s-social-media-ban-but-the-tech-is-flawed-256332

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

    May 16, 2025
  • MIL-Evening Report: Viral ‘Hongdae boy’ videos expose the fringe group of South Korean men trying to sleep with foreign women

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Joanna Elfving-Hwang, Associate Professor (Korean Society and Culture), Dean International (Korea), Curtin University

    Shutterstock

    If you’re on TikTok, you may have come across “Hongdae boys” or “Hongdae guys” recently. In a social media context, the term refers to a group of young South Korean men who prey on foreign women (particularly white women) visiting the Hongdae area in Seoul’s Mapo district.

    Largely made viral by popular South Korean TikToker Sean Solo (@itsseansolo) creating parodies of these men, Hongdae boys are depicted as men who make brazen (and slightly awkward) attempts at picking up unsuspecting tourists or foreign students.

    Some of these women, who are often viewed as sexually “available”, have sometimes been inspired by K-dramas or K-pop idols to visit Korea in search of the perfect South Korean boyfriend.

    So what’s behind the rise of Hongdae boy videos? And is Seoul turning into a place to avoid if you’re a young female traveller? Well, no. But Sean Solo’s parodies of this recognisable type of South Korean man shouldn’t be dismissed as purely comedy.

    A trend warranting further attention

    Much of the funny viral Hongdae boy content is aimed squarely at foreign audiences. In fact, your average South Korean is more likely to associate the phrase “Hongdae man” (Hongdae namja) with the “Hongdae look” that showcases carefully curated streetwear inspired by hip-hop, rap and vintage elements.

    Hongdae, a famous nightlife spot, is very popular with foreign visitors and South Korean students. In the 1990s it became the cradle of the underground and indie music scene, and remains a buzzing centre for arts and culture.

    Come nighttime, however, it has a reputation for becoming hookup central. There are even “hunting bars” (hunting pocha) where single men and women can go to try and find a match.

    While Hongdae guys are by no means representative of all Korean men (a point Sean Solo emphasises) the fact these men exist, and have become a recognisable part of Hongdae’s nightlife, speaks to serious broader issues of misogyny and gendered thinking.

    Ongoing issues for South Korean women

    South Korea has a reputation for being socially conservative, and K-dramas have emphasised this squeaky clean image. But in recent years, a growing number of South Korean women have spoken out about issues of sexual harassment and violence, including a crisis of digital sex crimes.




    Read more:
    AI is fuelling a deepfake porn crisis in South Korea. What’s behind it – and how can it be fixed?


    This has led to public demonstrations expanding on the global #MeToo movement.

    We’ve also seen the rise of the so-called 4B movement (also called the “Four Nos”). Described as more of an individual lifestyle choice rather than an organised movement, the aim of 4B is to push back against societal standards imposed on South Korean women regarding marriage, childbirth and relationships.

    As Asian studies expert Min Joo Lee notes, foreign women who are married to Korean men and living in Korea are often exoticised as dutiful housewives aspiring for “tradition”, while South Korean women are seen as troublesome and demanding.

    Gender equality issues have also been used as a political football by some politicians. For instance, recently impeached President Suk Yeol Yoon’s 2022 presidential campaign relied on a narrative of male disempowerment to mobilise the vote of young, disaffected men.

    Another setback came in late 2023, when the Supreme Court delivered a final verdict in a case deemed significant for the country’s #MeToo movement. It involved Seo Ji-hyun, a former prosecutor who, in 2018, filed a lawsuit seeking damages against a former male senior prosecutor who she accused of sexual harassment and abuse of power. The court dismissed her claims.

    Foreign fantasies and reality

    For foreign women unaware of South Korea’s gender inequality issues, and who expect the sugar-coated image of Korean men they’ve seen in K-pop or K-dramas, the reality of the hookup culture may come as a shock.

    The disjuncture between reality and the foreign fantasy of South Korea has increasingly been of interest to social commentators and researchers like myself. My own research on the topic has identified a kind of “global Koreanness” that has taken on a life of its own in the imaginations of non-Korean fans overseas.

    The Hongdae boy narrative is similar to the 4B movement in that it is fuelled by attention from outside South Korea. While the 4B movement was widely reported in Western media, it was driven by a relatively small group of courageous women who didn’t actually get mainstream attention in South Korea.

    Nonetheless, having a spotlight on these women still amplified their struggle to fight back against gendered ideas of what’s expected of them. These are ideologies that might treat them as objects to be looked at and “consumed” (such as with K-pop idols), or expect them to prioritise marriage and childbearing, over their own careers, to address a declining population.

    Hongdae boy videos, both comedic and otherwise, may have a similar effect. They’re drawing attention to the gendered expectations many South Korean women face, and the ways in which they are dismissed in their pursuit for equality.

    Joanna Elfving-Hwang receives funding from the Core University Program for Korean Studies through the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and Korean Studies Promotion Service of the Academy of Korean Studies (AKS-2022-OLU-2250005).

    – ref. Viral ‘Hongdae boy’ videos expose the fringe group of South Korean men trying to sleep with foreign women – https://theconversation.com/viral-hongdae-boy-videos-expose-the-fringe-group-of-south-korean-men-trying-to-sleep-with-foreign-women-256475

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

    May 16, 2025
  • MIL-Evening Report: How accurate are my medical records? You might be surprised how often errors creep in

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Sheree Lloyd, Senior Lecturer in Health Services Management, University of Tasmania

    DC Studio/Shutterstock

    Medical records of hundreds of patients at a Sydney hospital’s cancer genetics service have been reviewed following irregularities related to care by a single specialist.

    According to St Vincent’s Hospital, in about 520 records, there were matters such as poor documentation, incomplete correspondence and a lack of genetic counselling.

    In about 20 records, there were errors that carried potential risk – even if, ultimately, there had been no harm to patients – such as providing incorrect information and advice.

    Every now and again, cases like these make the headlines. Some examples of flawed medical records relate to individual human error. Some relate to issues in how electronic patient record systems are designed.

    These and other reasons mean errors can arise when records are created, accessed and shared.

    A huge potential for errors

    Health-care records describe the symptoms, conditions or problems being treated. They contain details about a patient’s medication, diet, mobility, social history, family concerns, observations, test results and language spoken. Health-care workers also document the plan to restore health, and progress. So entries must be correct, complete and timely.

    However, the scale of health-related communication and documentation is vast.

    Each day on average in Australia there are more than 33,000 hospitalisations, more than 112,000 out-patient services provided and more than 24,000 visits to emergency departments.

    Each month there are millions of specialist letters and discharge summaries shared to My Health Record

    Every interaction with a health-care professional requires notes to be made in a medical record.

    For example, a patient in a metropolitan public hospital is likely to be seen by at least three teams of nurses in a day, two or more junior doctors or registrars, as well as a specialist. Physiotherapists, speech therapists and other allied health workers may also be involved in someone’s care. Health-care teams record notes on paper, in electronic health records or a combination.

    There are also the millions of medical records updated in general practice, or by allied health workers outside hospitals.

    In hospital, multiple staff work in a team, each needing to consult and update a patient’s medical record.
    Rido/Shutterstock

    What type of errors are common?

    Accurate and timely medical records are supposed to allow staff to make safe clinical decisions, and to provide high-quality and continuous care. However, errors have been discovered in several audits and studies, including those related to medications.

    One review looked at how adverse drug reactions were recorded in electronic health records at one large Australian hospital. It found half of the reactions recorded lacked the minimum information required to inform clinicians about future treatment. One-third of records misclassified the type of reaction.

    A study of medication charts in Australia and New Zealand found at least one simple error on the medication charts of about 94% of the records reviewed. These included illegible drug names, missing information and inadequate documentation of allergies.

    One study from the United States found written errors, such as unclear documentation or not using plain language, were among the most common communication errors in the records analysed.

    What happens when there are errors?

    Errors in health-care records can spread, affecting how health-care professionals communicate with each other about the patient, potentially affecting care.

    Missing or inaccurate records can affect evidence collected as part of criminal, coronial or medical negligence investigations.

    As some hospital funding relies on the number and types of patients and interventions recorded, inaccurate records can affect health budgets.

    With inaccurate records, national and international collection of correct health-care information can be compromised.

    What causes errors?

    Errors in health-care records are caused by missing or incomplete information, including when health-care workers do not document changes.

    Difficulty in quickly finding important information, or delays in reporting new information, can contribute to errors, misdiagnosis and inappropriate treatment. This could be due to the ease of use of the electronic health record, the bulky or disorganised paper record or that health workers are busy.

    Health-care teams report using a mixed record systems (using both paper and electronic records) can cause problems.

    Then there’s “note bloat”, when staff copy and paste information from one place to another. This allows wrong information to perpetuate. This is a well-known hazard leading to errors, stress and wasted time.

    Abbreviations used in health-care records, particularly in medication charts, can be misunderstood or misinterpreted.

    An Australian study found one in three medication errors were technology-related and due to poor design or functionality.

    A Swedish study involved patients reviewing notes in their own medical records. It found almost 36% of patients found an error and more than 26% found an omission. About 18% of patients were offended by the content of the notes.

    Errors can arise when there are both paper and electronic records.
    val lawless/Shutterstock

    What can we do?

    Improving the accuracy of medical records is not just health workers’ responsibility, although clearly they have a major role to play. Their workplaces, the IT companies that design the electronic systems, even patients, can also play a role.

    Health workers can make sure medical records are complete, accessible, accurate, readable and long-lasting.

    Workplaces, such as hospitals, can highlight in training and education the importance of documentation and how poor practices can lead to errors, and contribute to safety and quality problems.

    IT companies can design electronic health records that support how health workers need to communicate with each other, and the way they work.

    Patients can ask their health provider to correct errors found in their records, including in My Health Record.

    Sheree Lloyd does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    – ref. How accurate are my medical records? You might be surprised how often errors creep in – https://theconversation.com/how-accurate-are-my-medical-records-you-might-be-surprised-how-often-errors-creep-in-256233

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

    May 16, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Spacewalk Research and Technology

    Source: NASA

    Crew members on the International Space Station periodically conduct spacewalks to perform a variety of tasks such as installing, upgrading, and repairing equipment. During a spacewalk on May 1, astronauts installed hardware to support the planned addition of a seventh roll-out solar array on the exterior of the space station. Each of these arrays produces more than 20 kilowatts of electricity and together they will increased power production by up to 30%, enabling more scientific operations on the orbiting lab.

    Some spacewalks include operations for scientific research. On January 20, 2025, crew members collected samples for ISS External Microorganisms, an investigation examining whether microorganisms have exited through station vents and can survive in space. Results could help determine changes needed in design of spacecraft (including spacesuits) to prevent human-associated microbes from contaminating Mars and other exploration destinations.

    The CSA (Canadian Space Agency) investigation EVA Radiation Monitoring, used a miniature, power-efficient wireless radiation measurement system or dosimeter worn by crew members during spacewalks. This type of device could help identify parts of the body that are exposed to the highest radiation levels during spacewalks. Results showed that this type of device is a feasible way to monitor individual dose during spacewalks. The device also has potential uses on Earth, such as monitoring radiation exposure during cancer treatments.

    Spacesuits are essentially one-person spacecraft that protect their wearers from the hazards of space, including radiation and extreme temperatures. Space station research is helping improve the suits and tools for spacewalks and activities outside spacecraft and for the exploration of the Moon and Mars.
    SpaceSkin on ExHAM, a JAXA (Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency) investigation, evaluated the durability of a fabric with imbedded sensors to detect damage. Sensors integrated into the exposed outermost layer of a spacesuit could detect damage such as impacts from micrometeoroids. Researchers documented factors to consider in design of textiles with sensing capabilities as well as the ability to withstand the hazards of space. Such fabrics could be integrated into spacesuits and habitats to help protect astronauts on spacewalks and future exploration missions.

    Researchers use the Materials International Space Station Experiment or MISSE facility on the exterior of the space station for experiments exposing various materials and components to the harsh environment of space. Along with solar cells, electronics, and coatings, MISSE-7 tested pristine fibers from Apollo mission spacesuits and others scratched by lunar dust to examine the combined effects of abrasion and radiation damage. Researchers report that the fabrics significantly degraded, suggesting the need for ways to prevent or mitigate radiation damage to spacesuits on extended missions to the Moon.
    MISSE-9 tested spacesuit materials treated with shear-thickening fluids. These suspensions of tiny particles in a fluid react to stress by quickly changing from a liquid to a solid. The research showed that the materials maintained their mechanical performance characteristics and puncture resistance after extended exposure.
    Keeping cool also is important on a spacewalk, where temperatures can reach 250 degrees. SERFE, or Spacesuit Evaporation Rejection Flight Experiment, tested a technology using water evaporation to remove heat from a spacesuit so crew members and equipment remain at appropriate temperatures during spacewalks. A current cooling method, called sublimation, exposes small amounts of water to space, causing it to freeze and then turn into vapor that disperses, removing heat as it does so. The SERFE technology may be less susceptible to water contamination than sublimation.

    Crew members use specialized airlocks to exit the station for spacewalks. Airlocks also make it possible to deploy satellites and other external equipment. The Nanoracks Bishop Airlock was the first commercially owned and operated airlock installed on the space station. Its size, design, and automation enable faster and more efficient movement of materials out of and into the station, reducing the crew and robotics time needed. In addition to facilitating spacewalks, this facility could support increased commercial use of the space station and expand research capabilities.

    [embedded content]

    MIL OSI USA News –

    May 16, 2025
  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Update: State Highway 1, Putaruru crash

    Source: New Zealand Police

    One person has died following a crash on State Highway 1, Putaruru this morning.

    Police were notified just after 7am that a truck had collided with a parked car, near the intersection with Sholson Street.

    The truck driver was unresponsive when emergency services arrived at the crash scene.

    Medical attention was immediately provided but sadly he could not be revived. 

    The road remains partially closed and motorists should continue to take alternative routes where possible.

    ENDS

    Issued by Police Media Centre. 

    MIL OSI New Zealand News –

    May 16, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: King: “Siloing Innovation” Harms American Security, Entrepreneurialism

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Maine Angus King
    WASHINGTON, D.C. — U.S. Senator Angus King (I-ME), in a hearing of the Senate Armed Services Committee (SASC), spoke with Dr. William Greenwalt, the former Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Industrial Policy, on the wide-ranging benefits of the United States’ collaboration with allies to bolster American defense modernization. During the exchange, Senator King noted that by retreating from our European, Japanese and Australian allies, we are “squandering that asset and siloing innovation.” Dr. Greenwalt agreed with Senator King, saying that cooperation with our allies is critical to the future of innovation and shared national security.
    “Dr. Greenwalt, I was struck by what you said in your opening statement. One of our asymmetric or I think our principal asymmetric advantage in terms of national security is our allies, and yet we put them through this long, arduous process. And there should be, I think you suggested a, I don’t know whether you call it an exemption or a bobtail process or something, so that we’re not, so that we can have greater cooperation with our allies. Is that? Is that a fair interpretation of what you said,” questioned Senator King.
    “Yes, I won’t even call it an easy pass lane,” said Dr. Greenwalt.
    “Well, I think that’s and the other piece of this, and as I travel and meet with security people in other countries, we’re missing an innovation multiplier by not working with our allies. Countries like Japan and Australia, Europe, Germany, UK, all have brilliant scientists who are working on a lot of innovative areas. And instead of having innovation be siloed by country, it’s always occurred to me that it would be much more, as I say, a multiplier, if we could work more closely and have better cooperation with the countries that are aligned with us? Is that a fair observation,” asked Senator King.
    “I think that’s a fair observation. We’re a country of 340 million, our allies together, the EU, NATO, Japan, Korea, kick us up over to over a trillion. We were close to the Chinese population,” responded Dr. Greenwalt.
    “And we’re squandering that asset by siloing innovation,” replied Senator King.
    “The number of scientists, engineers working together would be critical in the future, and unfortunately, right now, we’re all stove pipe working on these things separately,” said Dr. Greenwalt.
    “Well, I do want to, I have a visual aid in terms of the process. I’m not going to burden the committee, Mr. Chairman, by submitting it for the record, but this is the foreign military sales manual, 642 pages. I mean this to me this summarizes, in many ways, the problem of the of the process itself, which has impeded our ability to work with, again, with our allies,” finished Senator King.
    A member of the Senate Armed Services Committee (SASC) and the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI), Senator King is recognized as an authoritative voice on national security and foreign policy issues who has also been named a “fiscal hero” by government watchdogs for responsible spending. Last year, Senator King urged the DoD to take advantage of private sector technologies or risk losing access to innovative defense technologies. In previous SASC hearings, he has encouraged the DoD to adopt smart spending practices when it comes to developing defense technologies, and has emphasized that “new technologies win wars.”

    MIL OSI USA News –

    May 16, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Cotton, Gillibrand Introduce Bipartisan Bill to Protect Military Installations from Unauthorized Drones

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Arkansas Tom Cotton

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
    Contact: Caroline Tabler or Patrick McCann (202) 224-2353
    May 15, 2025

    Cotton, Gillibrand Introduce Bipartisan Bill to Protect Military Installations from Unauthorized Drones

    Washington, D.C. — Senator Tom Cotton (R-Arkansas) and Senator Kirsten Gillibrand (D-New York) today introduced the Comprehensive Operations for Unmanned-System Neutralization and Threat Elimination Response (COUNTER) Act, bipartisan legislation to enhance airspace security at military installations. 

    Senators Jim Banks (R-Indiana), Marsha Blackburn (R-Tennessee), Richard Blumenthal (D-Connecticut), John Boozman (R-Arkansas), Katie Britt (R-Alabama), Ted Budd (R-North Carolina), Shelley Moore Capito (R-West Virginia), Susan Collins (R-Maine), John Cornyn (R-Texas), Ted Cruz (R-Texas), Joni Ernst (R-Iowa), Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii), John Hoeven (R-North Dakota), Jim Justice (R-West Virginia), Mark Kelly (D-Arizona), James Lankford (R-Oklahoma), Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyoming), Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky), Jim Moran (R-Kansas), Markwayne Mullin (R-Oklahoma), Pete Ricketts (R-Nebraska), Jacky Rosen (D-Nevada), Rick Scott (R-Florida), Eric Schmitt (R-Missouri), Jeanne Shaheen (D-New Hampshire), Dan Sullivan (R-Alaska), Thom Tillis (R-North Carolina), and Todd Young (R-Indiana) are co-sponsoring this legislation. Representatives Chrissy Houlahan (Pennsylvania-06) and August Pfluger (Texas-11) are introducing companion legislation in the House.

    “Leaving American military facilities vulnerable to drone incursions puts our service members, the general public, and our national security at risk. Our bill will expand the Department of Defense’s authority to neutralize unauthorized drones,” said Senator Cotton. 

    “As commercial drones become more commonplace, we must ensure that they are not being used to share sensitive information with our adversaries, to conduct attacks against our service members, or otherwise pose a threat to our national security. This legislation will enable DoD to more effectively mitigate threats from drones and allow for better interagency cooperation to keep Americans safe. I am proud to be introducing this important piece of bipartisan legislation, and I look forward to working with my colleagues to get it passed,” said Senator Gillibrand. 

    “In recent years, there has been a disturbing increase in threats posed to U.S. military bases by unmanned aircraft systems, including from systems controlled by foreign adversaries. Despite this, our armed forces continue to tell us that they lack the authority to protect the skies over some of our most sensitive military installations,” said Rep. Houlahan. “Today’s introduction of the bipartisan COUNTER Act marks the next step towards delivering the expanded authorities our military needs to address the threats of unmanned aircraft systems and keep these facilities safe.”

    “Unauthorized drone activity near and over U.S. military installations has become a persistent and growing national security concern. In the past year alone, there were more than 350 drone detections at 100 different military installations,” said Rep. Pfluger. “This is why I am proud to help lead the bipartisan COUNTER Act, which gives our armed forces the clear authority they need to take down hostile drones and defend our most sensitive installations. As a fighter pilot with hundreds of hours in combat experience, I know firsthand how critical airspace security is — and how urgent this action has become.”

    Full text of the legislation may be found here.

    The COUNTER Act would:

    • Expand the definition of a “covered facility” as it is in current law, enabling more bases to apply for approval to detect, track, and, if necessary, neutralize drones.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    May 16, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Intermap Announces First Quarter 2025 Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Company reports first quarter 2025 revenue growth of 153% with 28% pro-forma adjusted EBITDA margin

    Confirms projected 2025 revenue of $30–35 million and 28% EBITDA margin

    Conference call today at 5:00 pm ET to discuss results

    DENVER, May 15, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Intermap Technologies (TSX: IMP; OTCQB: ITMSF) (“Intermap” or the “Company”), a global leader in 3D geospatial services and intelligence solutions, today announced first quarter 2025 results and affirmed 2025 guidance.

    For the first quarter ending March 31, 2025

    • Total revenue of $4.3 million, compared with $1.7 million in the first quarter of 2024
    • Acquisition Services revenue of $2.4 million versus $478 thousand in the year-ago quarter
    • Value-added Data revenue of $514 thousand versus $266 thousand in the year-ago quarter
    • Software and Solutions revenue of $1.3 million, compared with $942 thousand in the first quarter of 2024
    • 28% pro-forma adjusted EBITDA margin versus 25% in the first quarter of 2024
      • Intermap invested to support permitting and pursuit costs on behalf of its partners for follow-on awards
    • Pro-forma net income of $833 thousand, compared with a net loss of $839 thousand in the first quarter of 2024
    • Total assets of $19.2 million versus $11.9 million on December 31, 2024
    • Cash, unbilled and A/R totaled $13.9 million versus $6.5 million on December 31, 2024

    “We’re seeing strong momentum across our government and commercial segments,” said Patrick A. Blott, Intermap Chairman and CEO. “With multiyear partnerships, federal contracts and a strengthened balance sheet, we’re benefiting from growing customer confidence and positioning the Company for recurring revenue with long-term growth. We are pleased to affirm our 2025 guidance.”

    Q1 Government Milestones
    In the government sector, Intermap’s team, led by CACI, was selected as a vendor for the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency’s $200 million Luno B IDIQ contract. When combined with the previously announced Luno A award, the addressable opportunity totals $500 million. The first task orders have begun to be issued and Intermap is well positioned with superior proprietary source data and analytics located over difficult areas of the world inaccessible by optical satellites. This positions Intermap to compete for federal work over the next five years and expand its role in delivering advanced geospatial intelligence to support national security.

    Intermap continued to execute Phase 1 of Indonesia’s national mapping initiative, delivering high-resolution 3D elevation and feature data exceeding specifications in a shorter timeframe than planned. The Company is pursuing follow-on awards under Phase 2 of the $653 million World Bank–funded ILASP project, which supports land administration and spatial planning. With the Indonesian government prioritizing large-scale base maps for national development, Intermap’s Phase 1 performance positions it strongly for continued participation. The Company’s advanced technology and proven execution align with the project’s goals, including expansion into Java, Kalimantan and other key regions.

    As part of the Indonesian mapping program during the quarter, Intermap incurred charges for permitting, currency adjustment and working capital investment to support large government milestone payments, which were subsequently collected in April 2025, after the quarter end. In addition, Intermap incurred pursuit costs related to upcoming contracts. When the partner-related charges and pursuit costs are added back, pro-forma Adjusted EBITDA and earnings for the first quarter were $1.2 million and $833 thousand, respectively. To further mitigate exchange risks, Intermap entered into foreign currency hedging and arrangements with its local prime partner to pay IDR subcontractors. Going forward, currency risk and hedging costs are mitigated by World Bank funding, which will be denominated and fixed in U.S. dollars.

    During the quarter, Intermap was down-selected after a competitive process for a new U.S. Defense Advanced Research Project (DARPA) program to support priority DARPA investments targeted to leverage Intermap’s unique commercial capabilities, commercialization expertise, proprietary internal research and development and growth capital support. This program extends Intermap’s own upgrade efforts and capital with sponsored access to additional government-funded, cutting-edge applied geospatial technologies, advanced research and development, next-generation geospatial products and emerging dual-use companies on contract with DARPA. The Company is currently working with multiple customers using Intermap data and technology for real-time terrain matching to power long-range autonomous systems. More information about this important award will follow as contracting is finalized.

    Q1 Commercial Achievements
    Intermap began 2025 with strong performance in its insurance business, securing over $1.1 million in new and renewed contracts. It signed two major multiyear partnerships with a leading European bank-insurance group and PREMIUM Insurance. Both adopted Intermap’s Aquarius RMA platform, reinforcing the Company’s position as a key provider of AI-driven geospatial solutions for multi-peril and flood risk assessment.

    During the first quarter, the Company significantly expanded its partnership with a major global space infrastructure operator, which has increased its investment in the Company’s high-precision 3D elevation data with Intermap’s NEXTMap® solution. This expansion supports the operator’s use of the data for radio frequency interference modeling and optimizing site selection across diverse geographies. In 2024, the operator acquired 10 times as many projects as the previous year, driving a 6.4x increase in revenue. Early 2025 projects are nearly three times larger than the average size in 2024, with points of presence growing rapidly, reflecting the growing scale of the initiative. This rapid expansion demonstrates the operator’s growing reliance on Intermap’s best-in-class data.

    The Company also renewed its subscription partnership with a leading provider of GPS-enabled golf technology. Now entering its fourth year, the collaboration utilizes Intermap’s high-resolution 3D elevation data to map more than 40,000 golf courses globally, delivering immersive, real-time virtual experiences for golfers. This data powers advanced features such as swing metrics, ball flight analytics and detailed course visualizations—accessible from homes, backyards and practice ranges. Driven by strong user growth, the partnership is expanding to include a new generation of golf products built on Intermap’s proprietary terrain models, where Intermap is compensated alongside the customer for growing user data consumption. With 78% of core golfers using at least one golf app, Intermap’s data remains a key enabler of the evolving digital golf experience.

    Q1 Financing
    To fund growth, Intermap raised C$12 million in February. The capital strengthens the Company’s ability to execute on its expanding pipeline and scale delivery of high-value contracts.

    Outlook
    Intermap confirms projected 2025 revenue of $30–35 million and 28% EBITDA margin.

    Intermap does not provide quarterly guidance. The Company has tremendous installed capacity, providing a competitive advantage for speed of execution. Intermap’s customers are large global institutions and governments with long procurement and decision-making cycles. Intermap has the proven ability and track record to increase operational efficiency and tempo once under contract to meet aggressive timelines consistent with customer requirements.

    Intermap will continue building recurring revenue by enabling customers to consume the world’s most precise GEOINT terrain data products at global scale, as-a-service, provisioned within seconds, consuming only the points they need, when and where they need them. While penetrating deeper into its targeted markets, Intermap is also enabling new users and new use-cases, and its financial results highlight the persistent recurring revenue and high growth embedded in this attractive business model.

    Quarterly Filing
    The Company’s consolidated financial statements for the quarter ended March 31, 2025, along with management’s discussion and analysis for the corresponding period and related management certifications for the first quarter financial results, will be filed on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca and on the SEC’s EDGAR website at SEC.gov on May 15, 2025.

    Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP measure. The term earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) consists of net loss and excludes interest (financing costs), taxes, and depreciation. Adjusted EBITDA also excludes share-based compensation, fair value adjustments and foreign currency translation. See “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures” in Company’s Management’s Discussion and Analysis filed on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca and on the SEC’s EDGAR website at SEC.gov.

    Conference Call Details
    Intermap’s CEO Patrick A. Blott and CFO Jennifer Bakken will host a live webinar today, at 5:00 pm ET to review the results, provide Company updates and answer investor questions following the presentation.

    Intermap invites shareholders, analysts, investors, media representatives and other stakeholders to attend the earnings webinar to discuss the first quarter of 2025 results.

    DATE Thursday, May 15, 2025
    TIME 5:00 pm ET
    WEBCAST Register

    Learn more about Intermap here.

    Intermap Reader Advisory 
    Certain information provided in this news release, including reference to revenue growth, EBITDA margin, future contracting, constitutes forward-looking statements. The words “anticipate”, “expect”, “project”, “estimate”, “forecast”, “will be”, “will consider”, “intends” and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. Although Intermap believes that these statements are based on information and assumptions which are current, reasonable and complete, these statements are necessarily subject to a variety of known and unknown risks and uncertainties. Intermap’s forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties pertaining to, among other things, cash available to fund operations, availability of capital, revenue fluctuations, nature of government contracts, economic conditions, loss of key customers, retention and availability of executive talent, competing technologies, common share price volatility, loss of proprietary information, software functionality, internet and system infrastructure functionality, information technology security, breakdown of strategic alliances, and international and political considerations, as well as those risks and uncertainties discussed Intermap’s Annual Information Form and other securities filings. While the Company makes these forward-looking statements in good faith, should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary significantly from those expected. Accordingly, no assurances can be given that any of the events anticipated by the forward-looking statements will transpire or occur, or if any of them do so, what benefits that the Company will derive therefrom. All subsequent forward-looking statements, whether written or oral, attributable to Intermap or persons acting on its behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by these cautionary statements. The forward-looking statements contained in this news release are made as at the date of this news release and the Company does not undertake any obligation to update publicly or to revise any of the forward-looking statements made herein, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as may be required by applicable securities law.

    About Intermap Technologies 

    Founded in 1997 and headquartered in Denver, Colorado, Intermap (TSX: IMP; OTCQB: ITMSF) is a global leader in geospatial intelligence solutions, focusing on the creation and analysis of 3D terrain data to produce high-resolution thematic models. Through scientific analysis of geospatial information and patented sensors and processing technology, the Company provisions diverse, complementary, multi-source datasets to enable customers to seamlessly integrate geospatial intelligence into their workflows. Intermap’s 3D elevation data and software analytic capabilities enable global geospatial analysis through artificial intelligence and machine learning, providing customers with critical information to understand their terrain environment. By leveraging its proprietary archive of the world’s largest collection of multi-sensor global elevation data, the Company’s collection and processing capabilities provide multi-source 3D datasets and analytics at mission speed, enabling governments and companies to build and integrate geospatial foundation data with actionable insights. Applications for Intermap’s products and solutions include defense, aviation and UAV flight planning, flood and wildfire insurance, disaster mitigation, base mapping, environmental and renewable energy planning, telecommunications, engineering, critical infrastructure monitoring, hydrology, land management, oil and gas and transportation. 

    For more information, please visit www.intermap.com or contact:
    Jennifer Bakken
    Executive Vice President and CFO
    CFO@intermap.com
    +1 (303) 708-0955

    Sean Peasgood
    Investor Relations
    Sean@SophicCapital.com
    +1 (647) 260-9266

    The MIL Network –

    May 16, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Applied Materials Announces Second Quarter 2025 Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    • Revenue $7.10 billion, up 7 percent year over year
    • GAAP gross margin 49.1 percent and non-GAAP gross margin 49.2 percent
    • GAAP operating margin 30.5 percent and non-GAAP operating margin 30.7 percent
    • Record GAAP EPS $2.63 and record non-GAAP EPS $2.39, up 28 percent and 14 percent year over year, respectively
    • Generated $1.57 billion in cash from operations and distributed $2.00 billion to shareholders including $1.67 billion in share repurchases and $325 million in dividends

    SANTA CLARA, Calif., May 15, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Applied Materials, Inc. (NASDAQ: AMAT) today reported results for its second quarter ended Apr. 27, 2025.

    “Applied Materials’ broad capabilities and connected product portfolio are driving strong results in 2025 amidst a highly dynamic macro environment,” said Gary Dickerson, President and CEO. “High-performance, energy-efficient AI computing remains the dominant driver of semiconductor innovation, and Applied is working closely with our customers and partners to accelerate the industry’s roadmap. We are very well positioned at major technology inflections in fast-growing areas of the market, which supports our multi-year growth trajectory.”

    “We delivered strong performance in our second fiscal quarter with seven percent year-over-year revenue growth, record earnings per share and shareholder distributions of nearly $2 billion,” said Brice Hill, Senior Vice President and CFO. “Despite the dynamic economic and trade environment, we have not seen significant changes to customer demand and are well-equipped to navigate evolving conditions with our robust global supply chain and diversified manufacturing footprint.”

    Results Summary

      Q2 FY2025   Q2 FY2024   Change
      (In millions, except per share amounts and percentages)
    Net revenue $ 7,100     $ 6,646     7%
    Gross margin   49.1 %     47.4 %   1.7 points
    Operating margin   30.5 %     28.8 %   1.7 points
    Net income $ 2,137     $ 1,722     24%
    Diluted earnings per share $ 2.63     $ 2.06     28%
    Non-GAAP Results          
    Non-GAAP gross margin   49.2 %     47.5 %   1.7 points
    Non-GAAP operating margin   30.7 %     29.0 %   1.7 points
    Non-GAAP net income $ 1,940     $ 1,744     11%
    Non-GAAP diluted EPS $ 2.39     $ 2.09     14%
    Non-GAAP free cash flow $ 1,061     $ 1,135     (7)%
                       

    A reconciliation of the GAAP and non-GAAP results is provided in the financial tables included in this release. See also “Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures” section.

    Business Outlook

    Applied’s total net revenue, non-GAAP gross margin and non-GAAP diluted EPS for the third quarter of fiscal 2025 are expected to be approximately as follows:

             
      Q3 FY2025
    (In millions, except percentage and per share amounts)  
    Total net revenue $ 7,200   +/-   $ 500  
    Non-GAAP gross margin   48.3 %      
    Non-GAAP diluted EPS $ 2.35   +/-   $ 0.20  
                     

    This outlook for non-GAAP diluted EPS excludes known charges related to completed acquisitions of $0.01 per share, and includes a net income tax benefit related to intra-entity intangible asset transfers of $0.04 per share, but does not reflect any items that are unknown at this time, such as any additional charges related to acquisitions or other non-operational or unusual items, as well as other tax-related items, which we are not able to predict without unreasonable efforts due to their inherent uncertainty.

    Second Quarter Reportable Segment Information

    Semiconductor Systems Q2 FY2025   Q2 FY2024
    (in millions, except percentages)  
    Net revenue $ 5,255     $ 4,901  
    Foundry, logic and other   65 %     65 %
    DRAM   27 %     32 %
    Flash memory   8 %     3 %
    Operating income $ 1,900     $ 1,701  
    Operating margin   36.2 %     34.7 %
    Non-GAAP Results    
    Non-GAAP operating income $ 1,911     $ 1,711  
    Non-GAAP operating margin   36.4 %     34.9 %
    Applied Global Services Q2 FY2025   Q2 FY2024
    (in millions, except percentages)  
    Net revenue $ 1,566     $ 1,530  
    Operating income $ 446     $ 436  
    Operating margin   28.5 %     28.5 %
    Non-GAAP Results    
    Non-GAAP operating income $ 446     $ 436  
    Non-GAAP operating margin   28.5 %     28.5 %
    Display Q2 FY2025   Q2 FY2024
    (in millions, except percentages)  
    Net revenue $ 259     $ 179  
    Operating income $ 68     $ 5  
    Operating margin   26.3 %     2.8 %
    Non-GAAP Results    
    Non-GAAP operating income $ 68     $ 5  
    Non-GAAP operating margin   26.3 %     2.8 %
    Corporate and Other Q2 FY2025   Q2 FY2024
    (in millions)  
    Unallocated net revenue $ 20     $ 36  
    Unallocated cost of products sold and expenses   (265 )     (266 )
    Total $ (245 )   $ (230 )
                   

    Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures

    Applied provides investors with certain non-GAAP financial measures, which are adjusted for the impact of certain costs, expenses, gains and losses, including certain items related to mergers and acquisitions; restructuring and severance charges and any associated adjustments; impairments of assets; gain or loss, dividends and impairments on strategic investments; certain income tax items and other discrete adjustments. On a non-GAAP basis, the tax effect related to share-based compensation is recognized ratably over the fiscal year. Reconciliations of these non-GAAP measures to the most directly comparable financial measures calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP are provided in the financial tables included in this release.

    Management uses these non-GAAP financial measures to evaluate the company’s operating and financial performance and for planning purposes, and as performance measures in its executive compensation program. Applied believes these measures enhance an overall understanding of its performance and investors’ ability to review the company’s business from the same perspective as the company’s management, and facilitate comparisons of this period’s results with prior periods on a consistent basis by excluding items that management does not believe are indicative of Applied’s ongoing operating performance. There are limitations in using non-GAAP financial measures because the non-GAAP financial measures are not prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, may be different from non-GAAP financial measures used by other companies, and may exclude certain items that may have a material impact upon our reported financial results. The presentation of this additional information is not meant to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for the directly comparable financial measures prepared in accordance with GAAP.

    Webcast Information

    Applied Materials will discuss these results during an earnings call that begins at 1:30 p.m. Pacific Time today. A live webcast and related slide presentation will be available at https://ir.appliedmaterials.com . A replay will be available on the website beginning at 5:00 p.m. Pacific Time today.

    Forward-Looking Statements
    This press release contains forward-looking statements, including those regarding anticipated growth and trends in our businesses and markets, industry outlooks and demand drivers, technology transitions, our business and financial performance and market share positions, our capital allocation and cash deployment strategies, our investment and growth strategies, our development of new products and technologies, our business outlook for the third quarter of fiscal 2025 and beyond, and other statements that are not historical facts. These statements and their underlying assumptions are subject to risks and uncertainties and are not guarantees of future performance. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such statements include, without limitation: the level of demand for our products; global economic, political and industry conditions, including changes in interest rates and prices for goods and services; the implementation of additional export regulations and license requirements and their interpretation, and their impact on our ability to export products and provide services to customers and on our results of operations; global trade issues and changes in trade and export license policies and our ability to obtain licenses or authorizations on a timely basis, if at all; imposition of new or increases in tariffs and any retaliatory measures, including their impact on demand for our products and services; our ability to effectively mitigate the impact of tariffs; the effects of geopolitical turmoil or conflicts; demand for semiconductor chips and electronic devices; customers’ technology and capacity requirements; the introduction of new and innovative technologies, and the timing of technology transitions; our ability to develop, deliver and support new products and technologies; our ability to meet customer demand, and our suppliers’ ability to meet our demand requirements; the concentrated nature of our customer base; our ability to expand our current markets, increase market share and develop new markets; market acceptance of existing and newly developed products; our ability to obtain and protect intellectual property rights in key technologies; cybersecurity incidents affecting our information systems or information contained in them, or affecting our operations, suppliers, customers or vendors; our ability to achieve the objectives of operational and strategic initiatives, align our resources and cost structure with business conditions, and attract, motivate and retain key employees; the effects of regional or global health epidemics; acquisitions, investments and divestitures; changes in income tax laws; the variability of operating expenses and results among products and segments, and our ability to accurately forecast future results, market conditions, customer requirements and business needs; our ability to ensure compliance with applicable law, rules and regulations and other risks and uncertainties described in our SEC filings, including our recent Forms 10-Q and 8-K. All forward-looking statements are based on management’s current estimates, projections and assumptions, and we assume no obligation to update them.

    About Applied Materials

    Applied Materials, Inc. (Nasdaq: AMAT) is the leader in materials engineering solutions used to produce virtually every new chip and advanced display in the world. Our expertise in modifying materials at atomic levels and on an industrial scale enables customers to transform possibilities into reality. At Applied Materials, our innovations make possible a better future. Learn more at www.appliedmaterials.com.

    Investor Relations Contact:
    Liz Morali (408) 986-7977
    liz_morali@amat.com

    Media Contact:
    Ricky Gradwohl (408) 235-4676
    ricky_gradwohl@amat.com

     
    APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.
    UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
           
      Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended
    (In millions, except per share amounts) April 27,
    2025
      April 28,
    2024
      April 27,
    2025
      April 28,
    2024
    Net revenue $ 7,100     $ 6,646     $ 14,266     $ 13,353  
    Cost of products sold   3,615       3,493       7,285       6,996  
    Gross profit   3,485       3,153       6,981       6,357  
    Operating expenses:              
    Research, development and engineering   893       785       1,752       1,539  
    Marketing and selling   216       209       422       416  
    General and administrative   207       247       463       523  
    Total operating expenses   1,316       1,241       2,637       2,478  
    Income from operations   2,169       1,912       4,344       3,879  
    Interest expense   68       59       132       118  
    Interest and other income (expense), net   221       141       229       536  
    Income before income taxes   2,322       1,994       4,441       4,297  
    Provision for income taxes   185       272       1,119       556  
    Net income $ 2,137     $ 1,722     $ 3,322     $ 3,741  
    Earnings per share:              
    Basic $ 2.64     $ 2.08     $ 4.10     $ 4.50  
    Diluted $ 2.63     $ 2.06     $ 4.08     $ 4.47  
    Weighted average number of shares:              
    Basic   809       830       811       831  
    Diluted   812       836       815       837  
                                   
     
    APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.
    UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
           
    (In millions) April 27,
    2025
      October 27,
    2024
    ASSETS      
    Current assets:      
    Cash and cash equivalents $ 6,169     $ 8,022  
    Short-term investments   578       1,449  
    Accounts receivable, net   6,187       5,234  
    Inventories   5,656       5,421  
    Other current assets   1,118       1,094  
    Total current assets   19,708       21,220  
    Long-term investments   3,638       2,787  
    Property, plant and equipment, net   3,832       3,339  
    Goodwill   3,748       3,732  
    Purchased technology and other intangible assets, net   249       249  
    Deferred income taxes and other assets   2,457       3,082  
    Total assets $ 33,632     $ 34,409  
    LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY      
    Current liabilities:      
    Short-term debt $ 799     $ 799  
    Accounts payable and accrued expenses   4,706       4,820  
    Contract liabilities   2,491       2,849  
    Total current liabilities   7,996       8,468  
    Long-term debt   5,462       5,460  
    Income taxes payable   321       670  
    Other liabilities   892       810  
    Total liabilities   14,671       15,408  
    Total stockholders’ equity   18,961       19,001  
    Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $ 33,632     $ 34,409  
                   
     
    APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.
    UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
           
      Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended
    (In millions) April 27,
    2025
      April 28,
    2024
    April 27,
    2025
      April 28,
    2024
    Cash flows from operating activities:              
    Net income $ 2,137     $ 1,722     $ 3,322     $ 3,741  
    Adjustments required to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities:              
    Depreciation and amortization   103       96       208       187  
    Share-based compensation   159       134       354       304  
    Deferred income taxes   4       (134 )     672       (206 )
    Other   (109 )     (12 )     (14 )     (247 )
    Net change in operating assets and liabilities   (723 )     (414 )     (2,046 )     (62 )
    Cash provided by operating activities   1,571       1,392       2,496       3,717  
    Cash flows from investing activities:              
    Capital expenditures   (510 )     (257 )     (891 )     (486 )
    Cash paid for acquisitions, net of cash acquired   (1 )     —       (29 )     —  
    Proceeds from asset sale   33       —       33       —  
    Proceeds from sales and maturities of investments   1,921       582       3,144       1,113  
    Purchases of investments   (1,222 )     (474 )     (2,933 )     (1,223 )
    Cash provided by (used in) investing activities   221       (149 )     (676 )     (596 )
    Cash flows from financing activities:              
    Proceeds from issuance of commercial paper   100       100       300       200  
    Repayments of commercial paper   (100 )     (100 )     (300 )     (200 )
    Proceeds from common stock issuances   129       119       129       119  
    Common stock repurchases   (1,670 )     (820 )     (2,988 )     (1,520 )
    Tax withholding payments for vested equity awards   (35 )     (41 )     (177 )     (233 )
    Payments of dividends to stockholders   (325 )     (266 )     (651 )     (532 )
    Payments of debt issuance costs   (2 )     —       (2 )     —  
    Repayments of principal on finance leases   —       (14 )     —       (13 )
    Cash used in financing activities   (1,903 )     (1,022 )     (3,689 )     (2,179 )
    Increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash equivalents   (111 )     221       (1,869 )     942  
    Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash equivalents—beginning of period   6,355       6,954       8,113       6,233  
    Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash equivalents — end of period $ 6,244     $ 7,175     $ 6,244     $ 7,175  
                   
    Reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash equivalents              
    Cash and cash equivalents $ 6,169     $ 7,085     $ 6,169     $ 7,085  
    Restricted cash equivalents included in deferred income taxes and other assets   75       90       75       90  
    Total cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash equivalents $ 6,244     $ 7,175     $ 6,244     $ 7,175  
                   
    Supplemental cash flow information:              
    Cash payments for income taxes $ 763     $ 467     $ 833     $ 606  
    Cash refunds from income taxes $ 5     $ 3     $ 75     $ 5  
    Cash payments for interest $ 68     $ 68     $ 120     $ 102  
                                   

    Additional Information

      Q2 FY2025   Q2 FY2024
    Net Revenue by Geography (In millions)  
    United States $ 808     $ 853  
    % of Total   11 %     13 %
    Europe $ 252     $ 289  
    % of Total   4 %     4 %
    Japan $ 572     $ 453  
    % of Total   8 %     7 %
    Korea $ 1,562     $ 988  
    % of Total   22 %     15 %
    Taiwan $ 1,997     $ 1,019  
    % of Total   28 %     15 %
    Southeast Asia $ 135     $ 213  
    % of Total   2 %     3 %
    China $ 1,774     $ 2,831  
    % of Total   25 %     43 %
           
    Employees(In thousands)      
    Regular Full Time   36.0       34.8  
                   
     
    APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.
    UNAUDITED RECONCILIATION OF GAAP TO NON-GAAP RESULTS
           
      Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended
    (In millions, except percentages) April 27,
    2025
      April 28,
    2024
      April 27,
    2025
      April 28,
    2024
    Non-GAAP Gross Profit              
    GAAP reported gross profit $ 3,485     $ 3,153     $ 6,981     $ 6,357  
    Certain items associated with acquisitions1   6       7       13       14  
    Non-GAAP gross profit $ 3,491     $ 3,160     $ 6,994     $ 6,371  
    Non-GAAP gross margin   49.2 %     47.5 %     49.0 %     47.7 %
    Non-GAAP Operating Income              
    GAAP reported operating income $ 2,169     $ 1,912     $ 4,344     $ 3,879  
    Certain items associated with acquisitions1   11       10       23       21  
    Acquisition integration and deal costs   —       5       3       8  
    Non-GAAP operating income $ 2,180     $ 1,927     $ 4,370     $ 3,908  
    Non-GAAP operating margin   30.7 %     29.0 %     30.6 %     29.3 %
    Non-GAAP Net Income              
    GAAP reported net income $ 2,137     $ 1,722     $ 3,322     $ 3,741  
    Certain items associated with acquisitions1   11       10       23       21  
    Acquisition integration and deal costs   —       5       3       8  
    Realized loss (gain), dividends and impairments on strategic investments, net   (18 )     (3 )     (27 )     (4 )
    Unrealized loss (gain) on strategic investments, net   (80 )     (20 )     26       (300 )
    Foreign exchange loss (gain) related to purchase of strategic investment   23       —       23       —  
    Loss (gain) on asset sale   (44 )     —       (44 )     —  
    Income tax effect of share-based compensation2   4       11       (6 )     (15 )
    Income tax effects related to intra-entity intangible asset transfers3   32       18       706       40  
    Resolution of prior years’ income tax filings and other tax items   (124 )     —       (140 )     33  
    Income tax effect of non-GAAP adjustments4   (1 )     1       —       2  
    Non-GAAP net income $ 1,940     $ 1,744     $ 3,886     $ 3,526  
    1   These items are incremental charges attributable to completed acquisitions, consisting of amortization of purchased intangible assets.
         
    2   GAAP basis tax benefit related to share-based compensation is recognized ratably over the fiscal year on a non-GAAP basis.
         
    3   Amount for the six months ended April 27, 2025, included changes to income tax provision of $62 million from amortization of intangibles and a $644 million remeasurement of deferred tax assets resulting from new tax incentive agreements in Singapore in the first quarter of fiscal 2025.
         
    4   Adjustment to provision for income taxes related to non-GAAP adjustments reflected in income before income taxes.
         
     
    APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.
    UNAUDITED RECONCILIATION OF GAAP TO NON-GAAP RESULTS
           
      Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended
    (In millions, except per share amounts) April 27,
    2025
      April 28,
    2024
      April 27,
    2025
      April 28,
    2024
    Non-GAAP Earnings Per Diluted Share              
    GAAP reported earnings per diluted share $ 2.63     $ 2.06     $ 4.08     $ 4.47  
    Certain items associated with acquisitions   0.01       0.01       0.02       0.02  
    Acquisition integration and deal costs   —       0.01       —       0.01  
    Realized loss (gain), dividends and impairments on strategic investments, net   (0.02 )     —       (0.03 )     —  
    Unrealized loss (gain) on strategic investments, net   (0.10 )     (0.02 )     0.03       (0.36 )
    Foreign exchange loss (gain) related to purchase of strategic investment   0.03       —       0.03       —  
    Loss (gain) on asset sale   (0.05 )     —       (0.05 )     —  
    Income tax effect of share-based compensation   —       0.01       (0.01 )     (0.02 )
    Income tax effects related to intra-entity intangible asset transfers1   0.04       0.02       0.87       0.05  
    Resolution of prior years’ income tax filings and other tax items   (0.15 )     —       (0.17 )     0.04  
    Non-GAAP earnings per diluted share $ 2.39     $ 2.09     $ 4.77     $ 4.21  
    Weighted average number of diluted shares   812       836       815       837  
    1   Amount for the six months ended April 27, 2025, included changes to income tax provision of $0.08 per diluted share from amortization of intangibles and $0.79 per diluted share from a remeasurement of deferred tax assets resulting from new tax incentive agreements in Singapore in the first quarter of fiscal 2025.
         
     
    APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.
    UNAUDITED RECONCILIATION OF GAAP TO NON-GAAP RESULTS
           
      Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended
    (In millions, except percentages) April 27,
    2025
      April 28,
    2024
      April 27,
    2025
      April 28,
    2024
    Semiconductor Systems Non-GAAP Operating Income              
    GAAP reported operating income $ 1,900     $ 1,701     $ 3,886     $ 3,445  
    Certain items associated with acquisitions1   11       10       23       20  
    Non-GAAP operating income $ 1,911     $ 1,711     $ 3,909     $ 3,465  
    Non-GAAP operating margin   36.4 %     34.9 %     36.8 %     35.3 %
    Applied Global Services Non-GAAP Operating Income              
    GAAP reported operating income $ 446     $ 436     $ 893     $ 853  
    Non-GAAP operating income $ 446     $ 436     $ 893     $ 853  
    Non-GAAP operating margin   28.5 %     28.5 %     28.3 %     28.4 %
    Display Non-GAAP Operating Income              
    GAAP reported operating income $ 68     $ 5     $ 82     $ 30  
    Non-GAAP operating income $ 68     $ 5     $ 82     $ 30  
    Non-GAAP operating margin   26.3 %     2.8 %     18.6 %     7.1 %
    1    These items are incremental charges attributable to completed acquisitions, consisting of amortization of purchased intangible assets.
         

    Note: The reconciliation of GAAP and non-GAAP segment results above does not include certain revenues, costs of products sold and operating expenses that are reported within corporate and other and included in consolidated operating income.

     
    APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.
    UNAUDITED RECONCILIATION OF GAAP TO NON-GAAP EFFECTIVE INCOME TAX RATE
       
      Three Months Ended
    (In millions, except percentages) April 27, 2025
       
    GAAP provision for income taxes (a) $ 185  
    Income tax effect of share-based compensation   (4 )
    Income tax effects related to intra-entity intangible asset transfers   (32 )
    Resolutions of prior years’ income tax filings and other tax items   124  
    Income tax effect of non-GAAP adjustments   1  
    Non-GAAP provision for income taxes (b) $ 274  
       
    GAAP income before income taxes (c) $ 2,322  
    Certain items associated with acquisitions   11  
    Realized loss (gain), dividends and impairments on strategic investments, net   (18 )
    Unrealized loss (gain) on strategic investments, net   (80 )
    Foreign exchange loss (gain) related to purchase of strategic investment   23  
    Loss (gain) on asset sale   (44 )
    Non-GAAP income before income taxes (d) $ 2,214  
       
    GAAP effective income tax rate (a/c)   8.0 %
       
    Non-GAAP effective income tax rate (b/d)   12.4 %
           
     
    UNAUDITED RECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP FREE CASH FLOW
           
      Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended
    (In millions) April 27,
    2025
      April 28,
    2024
      April 27,
    2025
      April 28,
    2024
    Cash provided by operating activities $ 1,571     $ 1,392     $ 2,496     $ 3,717  
    Capital expenditures   (510 )     (257 )     (891 )     (486 )
    Non-GAAP free cash flow $ 1,061     $ 1,135     $ 1,605     $ 3,231  
                                   

    The MIL Network –

    May 16, 2025
←Previous Page
1 … 604 605 606 607 608 … 1,669
Next Page→
NewzIntel.com

NewzIntel.com

MIL Open Source Intelligence

  • Blog
  • About
  • FAQs
  • Authors
  • Events
  • Shop
  • Patterns
  • Themes

Twenty Twenty-Five

Designed with WordPress