Rental properties across the Melbourne CBD, suburbs and regional centres were visited by our Consumer Affairs renting taskforce today in a pre-Easter inspection sweep to check they are advertised accurately and minimum standards.
The taskforce has targeted rental properties open for inspection to make sure they’re safe, secure and fit for renters to move into. Since being announced in March 2024, the taskforce has held inspections in St Kilda, Footscray, Werribee, Fitzroy and Clayton. More targeted inspections are planned throughout 2025.
The most common issues found by the taskforce include mould, windows without blinds or curtains, and heating that doesn’t meet the legal specifications.
It’s an offence to let a renter move into a property that doesn’t meet minimum standards. Maximum penalties of more than $11,000 for individuals and more than $59,000 for companies may apply.
Inspections are one part of the taskforce’s proactive approach to compliance. When an advertised rental doesn’t meet the standards, the taskforce works with agents and rental providers before a breach occurs.
Other priorities include making sure rentals are advertised with a fixed price, condition reports are provided, and bonds are lodged with the Residential Tenancies Bond Authority.
They’re also making sure rental providers don’t try to re-let properties after issuing a notice to vacate on the grounds the property was to be sold, demolished or converted.
The taskforce has received more than 500 reports from the community via our online form. These reports, as well as market analysis, help the taskforce to work estate agents to get upgrades or repairs made so that the property meets minimum standards before a rental agreement is signed.
If you see a rental property advertised that you don’t think meets the minimum standards or doesn’t look like its marketing, you can report it anonymously through the online form.
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Adrian Beaumont, Election Analyst (Psephologist) at The Conversation; and Honorary Associate, School of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Melbourne
The significant turn-around in the federal polls ahead of the 2025 federal election, with the momentum now moving firmly in Labor’s direction.
A national Resolve poll for Nine newspapers, conducted April 9–13 from a sample of 1,642, gave Labor a 53.5–46.5 lead, a 3.5-point gain for Labor since the previous Resolve poll that was conducted after the March 25 budget. In late February, the Coalition had led by 55–45 in Resolve, so this is a big turnaround for Labor.
Primary votes were 34% Coalition (down three), 31% Labor (up two), 13% Greens (steady), 6% One Nation (down one), 12% independents (up three) and 5% others (steady).
Independents were probably offered as an option everywhere. Future Resolve polls are likely to account for the declaration of nominations on Friday by giving voters in each seat a full ballot readout. Only viable independents will attract significant support, so the overall independent vote will drop.
The preferencing method isn’t stated, but Resolve has used respondent preferences for its headline in its previous polls. By 2022 election preference flows, this poll would be about 53.5–46.5 to Labor, so it’s likely there was no difference between the two methods.
Anthony Albanese’s net approval surged 12 points to +1, with 45% saying he was doing a good job and 44% a poor job. Albanese had suffered negative double digit ratings for more than a year. Peter Dutton’s net approval slumped eight points to -18. Albanese led Dutton as preferred PM by 46–30 (42–33 previously).
Now 68% believed Donald Trump’s election was bad for Australia, up from 60% in the post-budget poll that was taken before the stock market slump that followed Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariffs announcement on April 2.
On Trump’s influence on the election, 33% said it made them less likely to vote for the Coalition while 14% said more likely (35–15 with uncommitted voters). When this question was asked of Labor, it was 22% more likely to vote Labor and 21% less likely (24–24 with uncommitted).
The Liberals continued to lead Labor on economic management by 36–31 (36–29 previously). On keeping the cost of living low, Labor and the Liberals were tied at 30–30 (31–27 to the Liberals previously). The last time the Liberals didn’t lead on cost of living was in October 2023.
Two other national polls also had Labor gaining, with Labor now leading by 50–45 including undecided in Essential, and by 54.5–45.5 in Morgan. Here is the poll graph.
With Labor’s two-party vote between 52% and 54.5% in the five most recent national polls (YouGov, Newspoll, Essential, Morgan and Resolve), they would be very likely to win a majority in the House of Representatives if the election results reflect this polling.
Single-member systems are not proportional. If Labor wins the national two-party vote by about 53–47, they will win a large majority of the seats in two-party terms against the Coalition. While Labor would lose some of their two-party win seats to Greens and independents, they would still win enough seats for a clear House majority.
Does the Coalition have any chance?
The current polls were taken after a period of stock market turmoil following Trump’s tariffs announcement. If there are no more major stock market slumps before the May 3 election, perhaps the Coalition can recover. Or Albanese could perform badly in Wednesday night’s ABC debate with Dutton. In-person early voting begins next Tuesday, so there’s less time left for recovery before many votes are cast.
The current polls all used respondent preferences for their headline, but there was no difference between respondent and 2022 election flows. Previously, polls were showing a difference of about one point in the Coalition’s favour. The Trump effect has increased Labor’s share of respondent preferences.
The Coalition’s main chance is that the polls are overstating Labor. In 2022, Labor’s primary vote was overstated, but preference flows were better for Labor than expected, causing cancellation of errors. In 2019, the polls suggested Labor would win by 51.5–48.5, but they lost by that margin.
In the US, polls have understated Trump in the 2016, 2020 and 2024 elections. I don’t believe that we should expect the polls are overstating Labor just because they overstated them in 2019 and 2022. But this is the Coalition’s best hope of an unexpected good result on election night.
Essential poll: Labor gains five-point lead
A national Essential poll, conducted April 9–13 from a sample of 2,254 (double the normal sample), gave Labor a 50–45 lead including undecided by respondent preferences (a 48–47 Labor lead in the post-budget Essential poll). This is Labor’s biggest lead in Essential since October 2023. If the undecided were excluded, Labor would lead by 53–47 according to The Guardian’s poll report.
Primary votes were 32% Coalition (down two), 31% Labor (up one), 13% Greens (up one), 9% One Nation (steady), 2% Trumpet of Patriots (steady), 9% for all Others (up one) and 4% undecided (down one). By 2022 election flows, this would give Labor about a 53–47 lead.
Albanese’s net approval was down one to -3 (47% disapprove, 44% approve), while Dutton’s net approval was down three to -9, his worst in Essential since May 2023. Albanese was trusted over Dutton on addressing cost of living by 34–28. By 50–33, voters thought the country was on the wrong track (52–32 previously).
By 49–18, voters wanted Australia’s annual immigration intake to decrease, with 33% wanting it to stay about the same. By 81–19, voters said they don’t pay for news via subscriptions or donations. On where they get information about news and current events, 54% selected commercial media, 24% public broadcasters, 14% social media influencers and 7% podcasters.
Morgan poll: Labor gains nine-point lead
A national Morgan poll, conducted April 7–13 from a sample of 1,708, gave Labor a 54.5–45.5 lead by headline respondent preferences, a one-point gain for Labor since the March 31 to April 4 Morgan poll.
Primary votes were 33.5% Coalition (up 0.5), 32% Labor (down 0.5), 14.5% Greens (up one), 6% One Nation (steady), 1% Trumpet of Patriots (down 0.5), 10% independents (up one) and 3% others (down 1.5). By 2022 election flows, this gave Labor an unchanged 54.5–45.5 lead.
By 48.5–34.5, voters thought the country was going in the wrong direction (52–33 previously). This is the smallest lead for wrong direction since September 2023. Morgan’s consumer confidence index was down 2.6 points to 84.2.
Adrian Beaumont does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
Rodney residents will have council rubbish collections funded by residential property rates from 1 September 2025.
The rates-funded rubbish collection is part of a regionwide move to a standardised waste service for Auckland.
From Monday 30 June, Auckland Council will begin delivering bins to residential properties in Rodney. The bins will be placed at the roadside of your property before council rubbish collections begin in the first week of September 2025.
Ratepayers in Rodney can request a smaller or larger rubbish bin until 18 May 2025.
Auckland Council General Manager Waste Solutions Justine Haves says that standardising waste services across Auckland will give everyone access to the same service at the same cost, wherever they live.
“Having everyone on a unified collection service, that includes recycling and food scraps, gives us the best chance to minimise waste and reduce emissions as we work towards Auckland’s goal of zero waste by 2040,” says Ms Haves.
“We want to protect Auckland’s natural environment by reducing reliance on landfills, while keeping costs for Aucklanders as low as possible. A universal rates-funded rubbish collection helps us to deliver a more consistent and cost-effective service and makes it easier to engage with Aucklanders on how we can all reduce waste,” she says.
With a choice of three bin sizes, Aucklanders can choose the size that best meets their individual household’s needs. The targeted rates charge for a property’s rubbish collection will depend on the size of the bin.
To date, Rodney residents have only had the option of using private waste services or taking their rubbish to a transfer station. Any residents using a private rubbish collection service should contact their provider before 1 September to find out what to do with their existing rubbish bin.
Rural residents
“We recommend residents living in rural properties use bins instead of bags to dispose of rubbish. Bins are much better for the environment than single-use plastic bags. Bins are also a safer option for residents and collectors, as the contents are completely contained,” says Ms Haves.
If it is not practical to use bins, rural residents in Rodney who would like to request bags should email ruralrefusebags@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz .
Rural residents who opt for bags instead of bins will have three choices in the number of bags per pack, depending on their household requirements, and this is reflected in the targeted waste rate for each household. A smaller pack of bags will have a lower targeted rate than a larger pack.
For more information, please visit aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/hellobinrodney
–Funding constraints see proposals to reduce security focus
The Government’s demands for savings in health mean Te Whatu Ora Health New Zealand is proposing to cut 338 People and Culture roles – at a time it when is struggling to recruit people to provide health services for New Zealanders.
In a change proposal released today Health New Zealand says it is looking to reduce its People and Culture services from 1632 roles to 1294 roles a net reduction of 21% or 338 roles, (some of which are vacant).
Public Service Association Te Pūkenga Here Tikanga Mahi National Secretary Fleur Fitzsimons says People and Culture services are vital to ensure there are enough health workers and the workers are supported, kept safe, paid properly and kept well.
“The People and Culture services ensure health workers who feel safe and supported so they can deliver the best possible health care to New Zealanders,” Fitzsimons says.
“These cuts are just another way the Government’s unfocussed reckless drive for savings will impact the healthcare New Zealanders receive,” Fitzsimons says.
“The PSA is seeking legal advice as to whether it would also challenge this change proposal in the Employment Relations Authority,” Fitzsimons says.
One of the biggest areas for cuts will be the Recruitment and Attraction function, which could see a net 126 roles go.
“These cuts make no sense when the delivery of health services is being held back by unfilled vacancies right across an extremely stretched health system,” Fitzsimons says.
The change proposal says the reduction in recruitment is based on implementing a new recruitment technology system, which is expected to take 12 months to roll out.
“This is a risky way to proceed. We understand the new technology hasn’t yet been put out to tender and its planned roll out would happen after Health New Zealand implements significant cuts to its Data and Digital team.
Two other areas that keep staff and patients safe and assist staff return to work after injury or illness are facing cuts:
– Occupational Health, which will see a net loss of 27 roles
– Health & Safety and Resilience, which will see a net loss of 55 roles.
The Organisational Culture and Development function, responsible for staff education and development and improving organisational culture, faces a net loss of 35 roles.
Another area for concern raised by the change document is the proposal to “significantly reduce” core parts of the security function that protects staff, property and operations.
The Protective Services function in the People and Culture team, which provides expert leadership and advice on security, is facing a loss of a net three roles.
The proposal says the challenge for the function is the move from a “guards and gates model” to a “proactive, risk-based approach”.
“Given resourcing constraints we are proposing to significantly reduce core components of a basic protective security function. We anticipate that initiatives like security incident response, corporate security, and regional support would be scaled back to critical cases,” the change proposal says.
“The allocation of resources and reassessment of priorities with this function does present several risks which require careful management of the work programme and best utilisation of advisory activity,” the proposal says.
Fitzsimons says the proposed changes to security and protection are ominous.
“The proposals underline that at a time of increased attacks on health workers there is an urgent need for more investment in security and protection, as there needs to be in the health system generally.”
The Public Service Association Te Pūkenga Here Tikanga Mahiis Aotearoa New Zealand’s largest trade union, representing and supporting more than 95,000 workers across central government, state-owned enterprises, local councils, health boards and community groups.
Amnesty International has announced the launch of a new Hong Kong section based overseas, following the closure of its offices in the city in 2021 amid a crackdown on human rights.
The new entity, Amnesty International Hong Kong Overseas (AIHKO), will be led by Hong Kong diaspora activists operating from key international hubs including Australia, Canada, Taiwan, the UK and the USA.
“The opening of Amnesty International Hong Kong Overseas marks a new chapter in the organization’s strengthened commitment to human rights in Hong Kong and its support for the Hong Kong diaspora around the world,” said Chi-man Luk, the new AIHKO Executive Director.
“The gutting of Hong Kong’s civil society has been a tragedy for the city with more than 100 non-profits and media outlets shut down or forced to flee. But since the closing of Amnesty International Hong Kong three years ago, our dedication has only grown. We are now ready to intensify our efforts by building new communities of support driven by the Hong Kong diaspora.”
Hong Kong’s human rights crisis
Since the 2019 pro-democracy movement, more than 10,000 people, many of them students, have been arrested for protest-related activities. Over 300 people have been arrested for alleged acts of “endangering national security”.
Prominent activists, including lawyer Chow Hang-tung and media advocate Jimmy Lai, face lengthy prison sentences for their peaceful advocacy. Both have been designated as “prisoners of conscience” by Amnesty International.
Hong Kong authorities have weaponized colonial-era sedition laws and introduced new repressive bills, creating an arsenal of tools against all forms of dissent, and even targeting overseas critics by issuing bounties and revoking passports.
Joey Siu, AIHKO board member and one of 19 Hong Kong activists with police bounties placed on them, said: “The threats have only made us stronger. They serve as a reminder that freedom is denied, even to those who have left Hong Kong. To truly be free from repression, we must continue to fight for human rights beyond our borders. We will do so on behalf of Hong Kongers, both in Hong Kong and across the world.”
Amnesty’s first section to operate wholly ‘in exile’
AIHKO is Amnesty International’s first-ever section founded and operated entirely “in exile”, and follows the exodus of hundreds of thousands of Hongkongers who have gone abroad in search of safety and freedom.
“Being overseas provides us with a degree of protection, allowing us to speak more freely and engage in advocacy work. We have a responsibility to do more to support those who remain in Hong Kong and continue their vital efforts,” said Fernando Cheung, AIHKO board member and former Hong Kong legislator.
AIHKO joins an increasing number of civil society organizations focused on Hong Kong issues that have established operations outside the city due to the shrinking space for civil society and freedom of expression in Hong Kong.
AIHKO, which is officially registered in Switzerland, will focus on advocating for human rights of Hongkongers, within Hong Kong and abroad, amplifying their voices and fostering a strong diaspora community globally.
“Amnesty’s Hong Kong Overseas office demonstrates the resilience of our movement, our determination never to be silenced, and our commitment to defending human rights no matter the challenges we face. This new section, and the model behind it, will play a crucial role in our struggle against authoritarian threats, in Hong Kong and beyond,” said Agnès Callamard, Secretary General of Amnesty International.
Background
Amnesty International’s local ‘section’ office ceased operations on 31 October 2021, while the regional office – which is part of Amnesty’s International Secretariat – moved its operations to the organization’s other offices in the Asia-Pacific and Europe.
Amnesty International considers a prisoner of conscience to be any person imprisoned solely because of their beliefs, identity or other status, and who has not used violence or advocated violence or hatred in the circumstances leading to their detention.
Fire and Emergency New Zealand will revoke the restricted fire season in most of Mid-South Canterbury from 1am on Wednesday 16 April, until further notice.
An open fire season means permits are no longer needed for open air fires.
The areas this change applies to are: Aoraki/Mt Cook, Glentanner, Pukaki Aero, Tekapo Balmoral, Mt Potts, Mesopotamia Station, Hakatere, and Glenaan Station.
Mid-South Canterbury District Manager Rob Hands says due to recent rain, the fire risk in the District has reduced.
“As we head further into autumn, we expect the fire risk to remain low,” he says.
Port Blakely Forests in Geraldine and Waimate and all Public Conservation Land remain in a restricted fire season. These areas are indicated on the attached map.
“If you are planning a burn, you should continue to check the conditions for your area oncheckitsalright.nz,”
“You can also find advice on how to conduct your controlled burns safely on this website,” Rob Hands says.
Inaugural Oceania Seabird Symposium is underway at Waipapa Taumata Rau,University of Auckland bringing experts from across Pacific region to learn more about protecting Oceania seabirds.
The inaugural Oceania Seabird Symposium 2025 got underway at Waipapa Taumata Rau, University of Auckland, bringing experts from across the Pacific region and the world to learn more about protecting Oceania seabirds.
The three-day symposium organised by the Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Programme (SPREP) runs from 14-17 April. Karen Baird, SPREP Threatened and Migratory Species Adviser, says the event is an invaluable opportunity to bring Western science, traditional culture, and knowledge together.
Keynote speakers will cover topics that include traditional knowledge and valuing relationships with Oceania seabirds, improving conservation, threats to seabirds, se abird bycatch in fisheries and the health of the ocean environment.
“This is so important because there’s so much to do. You heard already from a session this afternoon with discussions around traditional knowledge and culture about seabirds, says Baird.
“We’re really just starting out in some ways across the Pacific. This is a great opportunity to ensure we work together, bringing Western science and traditional culture and knowledge together, to protect seabirds much more effectively than if we were to try and do that separately.”
Pro Vice-Chancellor Pacific Professor Jemaima Tiatia-Siau and SPREP Deputy Director General Easter Catherine Chu Shing opened the symposium.
“Our goal is to conserve seabirds and their habitats, recognising the traditions and aspirations of the peoples of the Pacific Ocean and islands,” says Ms Chu Shing.
Professor Tiatia-Siau spoke of the significance of hosting an event dedicated to one of the guardians of our oceans—our seabirds.
“It is an honour to give an opening address at this important gathering, dedicated to one of the guardians of our oceans.
“Across the vast Pacific, seabirds have long been more than just creatures of the sea and sky. They are carriers of ancestral knowledge, navigators of weather and ocean currents, and messengers that connect our islands to one another and to the wider world… We have employed the frigatebird, or manumanu ne caqi in na vosa vaka Viti (the Fijian language), as the metaphor to ground our university’s inaugural Pacific strategy entitled – Ala o le Moana (or pathways through the ocean)…
“Seabirds are part of our identity as peoples of the Pacific,” says Professor Tiatia-Siau.
Associate Professor Brendon Dunphy from the University of Auckland’s School of Biological Sciences says the symposium is timely, given the need for greater investment and research across the Pacific region. Ninety percent of Aotearoa New Zealand’s seabird species are under threat, warmer oceans and reduced food sources, and fishing nets and lines are all having an impact.
“This is a very important symposium because it’s bringing together scientists. We’re in the seabird capital of the world. Seabirds are just messengers of what’s going on over the horizon and out at sea. They tell us about tuna stocks, fisheries, and all these impacts.
“They live on land and feed out at sea. They bridge the important gap between land and sea; they integrate so many different stresses.”
Associate Professor Dunphy says just by observing seabirds, there was so much information that could be gained.
“Simply by looking at seabirds, from looking at their feathers, how they live, their chicks, there is so much we can gain from it. We see the Pacific as an area needing a lot of work. We need to put in a lot of research and investment, as there is so much change happening.”
Esteemed Tohunga Tohorā (whale expert) Dr Ramari Stewart (Ngāti Awa) received an Honorary Doctor of Science from Waipapa Taumata Rau three years ago and was a keynote speaker on day one; she talked about the importance of relationships, seabirds and people.
Renowned internationally for her commitment to mātauranga Māori (Indigenous knowledge) and science practices surrounding whales, she has extensive knowledge of the ngahere (forest) and the moana (ocean) as well as being a leading practitioner of rongoa (Māori medicine) and a trained nurse.
Stewart told the audience about passing on stories and walking backwards into the future, of the need for stories to be perfect when passed on from one generation to the next, to avoid crucial information being lost.
“Because stories are passed from one generation to another, it’s so important when they’re retold by the next generation, they need to be perfect… there is a whole lot of the tale that gets dropped out. Those details are so important.”
As well as an esteemed programme of keynote experts still to present, the three-day symposium will also include a number of workshops around seabird identification, colony surveying and monitoring, restoration, and a necropsy (autopsy of seabirds) workshop.
Symposium guests also have the opportunity to attend a number of field trips: a boat trip for seabird watching to the Poor Knights Islands and beyond, Tawharanui Open Sanctuary – a model for seabird restoration, Motuora Island, restoration island, and also a visit to Auckland’s west coast, working to save remnant colonies in Te Henga (Bethells Beach) and Muriwai.
Partner and Head of Energy Kate Axup participated in a panel discussion at The Australian Financial Review Business Summit in March, joining industry leaders to explore the topic ‘Energy Transition: the Trump 2.0 effect and its potential impact on Australia’s 2030 climate goals and investment’.
Kate also shared her insights on the challenges of establishing a local nuclear industry, saying,
‘The entire regulatory regime you need to set up to underpin nuclear energy – there are international conventions on nuclear third-party liability, a web of regulation that every country that has a nuclear energy industry has put in place, and we’re absolutely nowhere on this’.
To learn more about Australia’s energy transition and the potential consequences of recent policy changes in the US, watch the full panel session recording above, courtesy of the Australian Financial Review.
Establishing a suitable legislative framework9 min read
With the country’s coal-fired power fleet rapidly ageing, nuclear power has been suggested as a possible provider of low-emissions, reliable power to support the energy transition. This raises the question: what changes are required to Australia’s legal and regulatory framework to support the introduction of a nuclear industry?
Developing any new industry takes time and involves significant, often complex, changes. The development of Australia’s offshore wind sector, for example, has encountered these kinds of challenges, along with its own unique hurdles. In the same way, lifting the federal and state/territory bans on nuclear power is essential to opening the door for nuclear energy projects in Australia.
In this Insight, we explore the legal and regulatory reforms necessary for nuclear power projects to become a viable option in Australia.
Key takeaways
Establishing a nuclear industry in Australia requires significant legal and regulatory changes.
Lifting the federal and state/territory bans on nuclear power is essential to opening the door for nuclear energy projects in Australia.
A dedicated regulatory body would need to be established to oversee the nuclear industry, ensuring safety and compliance.
A comprehensive third-party liability regime would need to be implemented to manage risks and provide clarity around accountability.
Australian government financial support will be necessary, either via a government-owned nuclear power developer or combining government funding with private sector involvement to support nuclear power projects.
Coordination with states and territories would be crucial to align legislative frameworks and enable the successful development of nuclear power infrastructure.
Key steps to establish a nuclear energy industry in Australia
Establishing a nuclear industry in Australia would require significant changes, including lifting existing bans, aligning federal and state legislation, creating a dedicated regulatory body, developing a third-party liability regime and implementing a financing structure capable of attracting long-term investment.
The initial steps would require the Government to:
lift legislative bans;
coordinate with states and territories to ensure consistent frameworks that support the nuclear sector;
establish a dedicated regulatory body to oversee the industry’s standards and operations;
implement a comprehensive third-party liability regime to address safety and accountability; and
develop financing structures that attract investors and international developers.
1. Lift the federal ban on nuclear power plants
The development and operation of nuclear power plants in Australia is currently banned under federal legislation, specifically the Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Act 1998 (Cth) (ARPANS Act) and the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth) (EPBC Act), and various state legislation.
The federal ban may be lifted by:
amending the EPBC Act to provide a pathway for federal environmental approval of nuclear installations—this would include amendments to the following sections of the EPBC Act: 37J (No declarations relating to nuclear action), 140A (No approval for certain nuclear installations), 146M (No approvals relating to nuclear actions) and 305(2)(d) (Minster may enter into conservation agreements); and
amending the ARPANS Act, which regulates the construction, operation, and licencing of small-scale nuclear and radioactive facilities primarily used for medical and medical research purposes (like the Lucas Heights Facility) to provide for the licencing and regulation of civil nuclear power stations. This would also involve expanding the existing scope and application of the licencing regime under that Act to address specific nuclear power plants development and operation issues.
As an alternative to amending the ARPANS Act, adopting a similar approach to the one taken for the AUKUS nuclear-powered submarines, which involved the enactment of the Australian Naval Nuclear Power Safety Act 2024 (Cth) (ANNPS Act). Broadly, the ANNPS Act:
provided a licencing and safety regime for regulated activities (such as constructing and operating an AUKUS submarine) within designated zones in Western Australia and South Australia; and
excluded the operation of state and territory laws that would otherwise apply to such activities.
Other federal legislation that may need to be amended to support nuclear power plants include: the National Radioactive Waste Management Act 2012 (Cth), the Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation Act 1987 (Cth), and the Nuclear Non-Proliferation (Safeguards) Act 1987 (Cth).
2. Establish a nuclear energy regulator
At the same time, Australia would require a new legal authority to regulate industry operations in areas such as nuclear safety, site licencing, construction, operation, decommissioning, fuel and waste.
Such an authority would be similar to, for example, the UK’s Office for Nuclear Regulation, which oversees the 36 licensed nuclear sites in Great Britain (including the recently licensed Hinkley Point C and Sizewell C).
The regulatory body could be established by:
expanding the mandate of the regulatory body established under the ARPANS Act (being the Australian Protection and Nuclear Safety Authority) to include licencing and regulation of nuclear power facilities (noting the Coalition’s Nuclear Energy Plan highlights the possibility of also consolidating the functions of this regulatory body with the Australian Safeguards and Non-Proliferation Office—being the regulatory body responsible for nuclear and chemical weapons treaties); or
expanding the functions of the Australian Naval Nuclear Power Safety Regulator, which is responsible for the regulation of the AUKUS nuclear-powered submarines.
3. Coordinate state and territory legislation
The Government would also need to work with the states and territories to coordinate new federal, state and territory legislation to support the delivery of nuclear power projects.
This would require NSW, Queensland, South Australia, Victoria, Western Australia and the Northern Territory to lift their respective bans on nuclear activities.
4. Implement a third-party liability regime
Domestic liability regime
Given community and participant concerns about potential nuclear incidents, most nuclear energy jurisdictions have implemented a comprehensive domestic legal regime governing liability for nuclear events. We expect Australia would need to adopt a similar regime.
These regimes typically cover topics such as:
Liability channelling: to reduce the number of defendants in any claim (and simplify the associated proceedings), jurisdictions adopt one or more mechanisms to ensure that nuclear liability is channelled to the nuclear installation operator only. For example, in the UK, the Nuclear Installations Act 1965 (NIA) allocates liability for a nuclear incident to the operator and provides a full defence in the UK courts to others for the types of liability covered by the NIA. In the Australian context, this would require navigating Australia’s federal system, involving overlapping state and federal laws.
Strict liability: to simplify arguments around negligence and causation, many jurisdictions adopt a strict liability regime. That is, the nuclear operator is deemed to be liable for loss flowing from an incident at its installation, regardless of who is actually at fault.
Liability caps: while the regimes seek to make it easier to bring a nuclear claim, they typically provide a statutory liability cap in favour of the operator, often with the government operating as an insurer of last resort for claims above the statutory cap. For example, in the UK, the NIA sets annual financial caps on operator liability, after which the UK Government covers claims up to the required minimum thresholds.
International liability regime
In addition to implementing a comprehensive domestic liability regime, it is likely Australia would seek to sign and ratify one or more international nuclear liability treaties.
There are three different (and somewhat competing) international regimes. While Australia might seek to participate in multiple treaties, in practice most jurisdictions choose to participate in one only.
The most recent treaty is the Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage (CSC), which was established under the auspices of the United Nations’ International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in 1997 and covers the greatest number of nuclear power reactors globally. Importantly, the United States, Japan, India and Canada have signed and ratified the CSC only. Australia is a signatory to the CSC, but has not ratified the CSC.
The 1960 Paris Convention on Third Party Liability in the Field of Nuclear Energy (Paris Convention), supplemented by the Brussels Convention Supplementary to the Paris Convention and most recently updated in 2004, was developed under the auspices of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA). It mainly covers Western European states, including the United Kingdom and France.
The 1963 Vienna Convention on Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage, most recently updated in 2004, was also developed under the auspices of the IAEA, but mainly covers states in Eastern Europe and Latin America.
While it would be possible for Australia to proceed without ratifying one of these conventions (as the PRC and South Korea have chosen to do), Australia’s dependence on a global nuclear supply chain means it is likely to ratify at least one.
Ratifying a nuclear treaty would bolster Australia’s domestic nuclear liability regime, eg by precluding claims being brought in other signatory jurisdictions for incidents occurring in Australia. The choice of treaty would also shape Australia’s nuclear liability policy, eg because they mandate different levels of state indemnity for nuclear incidents.
5. Adopt a financing structure
Funding model
It is unlikely that a foreign investor funding model, used in the UK and other nuclear energy jurisdictions, would be available for Australian projects. Instead, Australian nuclear power projects would likely be developed by:
a new government-owned nuclear power developer— perhaps similar to NBN Co, Australia’s national wholesale open-access data network; or
a private developer, partly financed by the Government through a combination of debt and equity—perhaps similar to funding models adopted for Badgerys Creek Airport and the WestConnex road project—both of which involved a mixture of federal grant funding and concessional loans.
In either case, Australia would need to rely heavily on a ‘national champion’ to drive the development of these projects, in partnership with experienced private sector nuclear companies.
Expansion of ARENA and CEFC
Australia may also consider expanding the mandate of existing agencies such as the Australian Renewable Energy Agency and Clean Energy Finance Corporation to extend to nuclear energy projects, to provide such grant funding and concessional loans (respectively).
Government support
In addition, we expect that federal support would be required for the construction phase of each project, as well as a government offtake contract or revenue underwrite for these projects, in order to secure debt financing.
To the extent that bank debt is proposed to be included in the financing mix, it is likely that financiers would require extensive due diligence to fully understand the proposed technology, due to the novelty of such technology in the Australian market, and proposed risk mitigants for delay and cost overruns given the challenges experienced for similar projects overseas.
In determining an appropriate structure, Australia may look to existing nuclear energy jurisdictions for examples and lessons that can be learned.
For example, in the UK, there has been a shift in the approach to government support contracts—from the ‘contract for difference’ model to a utility model involving a regulated asset base.
Contract for difference (Hinkley Point C): investors agree to pay the entire cost of constructing the nuclear plant, in return for an agreed fixed price for electricity output following completion—this is funded by consumers, who will pay the difference between the wholesale electricity price and the final fixed price once the plant is operational.
Regulated asset base model (Sizewell C): investors are able to share some of the project’s construction and operating risks with consumers from the start, lowering the cost of capital.
The complex regulatory road ahead
While the potential for nuclear energy to contribute to Australia’s low-emissions future is clear, the path to achieving this vision will involve overcoming significant challenges.
Despite the hurdles, a carefully structured and long-term approach could pave the way for nuclear power to play a role in diversifying Australia’s energy mix and supporting its transition to a sustainable and low-emissions future.
The Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI) is consulting on changes to improve the default carbon tables for exotic forests in the New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme (NZ ETS). Default carbon tables are used by small-scale forestry participants to calculate the carbon stored in their forests. We are also consulting on other technical regulatory amendments for forestry in the NZ ETS.
We want your feedback about the proposals – summaries are on this page and full details are in the discussion document.
You can send us your submission from 15 April until 5pm on 16 May 2025.
The Maximising Forest Carbon Programme aims to improve how we measure, recognise, and reward carbon storage in our native and exotic forests. One of the ways it will do this is by improving the accuracy of the default carbon tables.
Summary of proposed changes to the default carbon tables for exotic forests
Participants with less than 100 hectares of forest land registered in the NZ ETS use the default carbon tables to calculate their forest’s carbon storage. The tables were developed in 2007–2008 using the best data available at the time but have not been meaningfully updated since.
Tree species in the NZ ETS are grouped into 5 forest types for carbon calculations. These are:
Pinus radiata (radiata pine)
Douglas-fir
exotic hardwoods
exotic softwoods
indigenous (native).
We are proposing updates to default carbon tables for the following types of exotic forest:
exotic softwoods
exotic hardwoods
Pinus radiata (radiata pine)
We’re also proposing to introduce a new forest type and default tables for redwoods. Redwoods are currently in the exotic softwoods forest type but under our proposals redwoods would be separated from exotic softwoods.
These improvements will help to ensure:
the forest types in the NZ ETS reflect the main types of forest grown in New Zealand
the default carbon tables provide robust carbon sequestration estimates
small-scale forestry participants are fairly rewarded for their carbon sequestration.
Summary of proposed regulatory amendments in the NZ ETS
Separate to the default tables proposals, we are also proposing some smaller amendments to the Climate Change (Forestry) Regulations 2022. These changes address technical issues. They are:
clarifying whether young forests that fail to thrive should be considered first or subsequent rotation under averaging accounting
updating the deadline for the input calculator to align more closely to the deadline for emissions returns
streamlining the processing for transmissions of interest
simplifying the treatment of small areas
future-proofing the method of spatial measurement used for determining land area.
Making your submission
Send us your feedback on the proposals by 5pm on 16 May 2025.
You can submit feedback on the whole document, or just the areas relevant to you.
There are 3 ways you can make a submission – using an online form, or by emailing or posting your submission.
If you are sending us a submission by email or post, we encourage you to use the submission template. The submission template has the same questions as the online form.
Maximising Forest Carbon Programme Te Uru Rākau – New Zealand Forest Service PO Box 2526 Wellington 6140.
Include the title of the consultation document with your submission: Proposed changes to forestry in the NZ ETS.
Additionally, you may choose to include the following optional details:
your name and title
your organisation’s name (if you are submitting on behalf of an organisation, and whether your submission represents the whole organisation or a section of it)
your contact details (such as phone number, address, and email).
Providing this information is optional. If you do include it, it will help us gain more insights from your submission.
Note that all, part, or a summary of your submission may be published on this website. Most often this happens when we issue a document that reviews the submissions received.
People can also ask for copies of submissions under the Official Information Act 1982 (OIA). The OIA says we must make the content of submissions available unless we have good reason for withholding it. Those reasons are detailed in sections 6 and 9 of the OIA.
If you think there are grounds to withhold specific information from publication, make this clear in your submission or contact us. Reasons may include that it discloses commercially sensitive or personal information. However, any decision MPI makes to withhold details can be reviewed by the Ombudsman, who may direct us to release it.
Our personal information is more valuable than ever. The most recent government cyber threat report warns that foreign state actors have an “enduring interest” in obtaining sensitive and personally identifiable information about Australians.
In recent weeks, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese noted “there is a cyber attack in Australia roughly every six minutes. This is a regular issue.”
In some situations, it can be difficult to protect our info even when we’re aware of the risks. Notably, in Australia many rental providers and their agents collect, store and disclose excessive personal information on potential tenants. Sometimes, they collect more info than what’s needed to get a government security clearance.
With about one-third of Australian households being renters, the handling of renters’ data is a major concern for Australia’s information security.
So what information are real estate agents collecting, and how can we mitigate the risks?
With renters competing for housing, rental providers are empowered to command larger rent increases. They also require potential tenants to provide extensive personal information.
For tenants, sharing – or oversharing – of personal information in the hope of securing a home might seem acceptable.
However, the collection and handling of this information raises serious security concerns. If Australians’ sensitive personal data falls into the hands of cyber criminals, or foreign agents, this has security implications for the entire nation.
What info are renters asked for?
Potential tenants need to provide information to the satisfaction of the real estate agent and their client, the rental provider. This information is increasingly collected online via rental application websites where the form questions are controlled by real estate agents.
The rental application websites seem to recognise that this information is extensive: one rental application website started selling a privacy service where they vouch for the applicant instead of sharing their information with the real estate agents.
In some cases, the requested data matches or even exceeds the requirements for a government security clearance. The Australian Government Security Vetting Agency (AGSVA) has a clear public privacy statement. It explains how data is collected and handled and used only for the assessment of a security clearance. Rental providers don’t necessarily follow the same stringent rules.
Information collected by some rental application forms may include five or more years of address history. Others request five or more years of employment history. In addition, financial information such as payslips and bank statements are also required.
Other sensitive – and irrelevant – information includes vehicle registration numbers and pet names.
Potential tenants are also usually asked to attach personal identification documents including passports, driver licences and Medicare cards. They may be asked to list up to two personal and one business references.
A rental agent may require five years of employment history. Author provided
If any of this information falls into the wrong hands, it easily exposes the person to social engineering, personalised scams or identity and account theft.
Who can access the info?
The names of family members and pet names are a common – albeit unsafe – choice of password. The rental application forms collect both. In Australia, research by Telstra and YouGov found that 20% of Australians used pets’ names as passwords, and 17% used their birth dates.
Pet names may be required on rental applications. This can give away some people’s passwords. Author provided
If a rental provider, or their agent, shares applicant information with others, it can be a security breach. This makes the storage, handling and sharing of this information by private rental providers a major concern.
More importantly, after the information is sent to the owner of the rental property, there is no visibility as to who that is, or what they do with the information.
Example of a privacy agreement on a rental application form. Author provided
Too much info to rent a home
Having to share extensive personal information is more than an inconvenience for renters – it’s a serious security concern. The government should put explicit limits on personal information requested by rental providers.
One technological solution to this problem could be “access tokens” provided by banks. People in Australia are protected by the Consumer Data Right. This allows consumers to authorise a data holder, such as a bank, to share data with an accredited recipient.
Australian banks are held to strict information security requirements. They already handle highly sensitive data, such as client identity, income sources and other financial information.
If real estate agents require proof of this info to vet potential rental applicants, they could request it through an authorisation token with the applicant’s bank. This way, proof of identity and financial status could be shared without having to disclose actual sensitive personal information, limiting the cyber security risk.
In the meantime, rental providers and their agents should request the least possible amount of personal information – it’s the responsible thing to do.
The article gives the example of the Consumer Data Right, a government standard managed by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC). Moataz ElQadi worked previously for the ACCC, in a different team.
Source: Press Release Service – Press Release/Statement:
Headline: From Local Roots to National Recognition: Ultimate Web Designs Emerges as a Digital Powerhouse in New Zealand
Ultimate Web Designs has quickly grown into a leading digital agency in New Zealand, known for high-quality, custom-built websites and apps developed entirely in-house. Completing over 1,000 projects, the company emphasizes transparency, results-driven solutions, and strong client relationships, positioning itself as a trusted digital partner nationwide.
NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi (NZTA) is welcoming a fine of $63,000 imposed during sentencing in Manukau District Court today in relation to an incident on 17 June 2023 in which the KiwiRail-operated Hamilton to Auckland Te Huia commuter service failed to obey a red signal in the busy Auckland Metro Rail Network.
NZTA prosecuted KiwiRail as the operator/licence holder of the Te Huia Service following an investigation into the incident, where the Te Huia, carrying over 90 passengers, passed a red signal at Penrose train station, and in doing so potentially put its passengers and other rail users at risk, and caused significant disruption on the Auckland metro network.
KiwiRail pleaded guilty to one charge alleging that it did not provide appropriate training of its personnel.
“As the regulator for rail safety in New Zealand, NZTA’s prosecution was taken to address a specific, identified risk in order to protect public safety. NZTA will not hesitate to take action, including prosecution, in relation to breaches of the Railways Act 2005. We welcome the sentence handed down today as a reminder to all licensed rail operators of the importance of ensuring appropriate training for their staff as a critical part of managing safety risks on the network,” says Gini Welch, NZTA National Manager, Rail Safety Regulation.
Environment Minister Penny Simmonds has today announced two new appointments and two reappointments to the Waste Advisory Board.
The Waste Advisory Board provides independent advice to the Minister for the Environment on matters relating to the Waste Minimisation Act 2008 and waste minimisation.
“I am very pleased to welcome Dr Terri-Ann Berry and Michelle Kazor to the Waste Advisory Board,” Ms Simmonds says.
“Dr Berry is an Associate Professor at the School of Future Environments at Auckland University of Technology and the founder and Co-Director of the Environmental Innovation Centre, a private research institute focused on improving sustainability outcomes, especially in the construction industry.
“Ms Kazor has more than 20 years’ experience in waste, resource efficiency, and climate policy, and has worked across government, corporate, and non-profit sectors in New Zealand, Australia, and the United States.”
In addition to the new appointments, Ms Simmonds also reappointed Board Chair Darren Patterson, and Board member Don Chittock.
“Mr Patterson has more than 25 years’ experience in industry, local and central government, and community projects, as well as significant board experience. He has provided sound leadership to the Board during the last six years as Chair and his reappointment will ensure continuity of knowledge and experience.
“Likewise, Mr Chittock brings a wide range of industry experience and has led some of the more technical pieces of the Board’s work. His reappointment means he will continue to provide the group with experience in the more technical aspects of the industry.”
Ms Simmonds thanked outgoing Board members Denise Roche, Jacqui Forbes and Sue Coutts.
“These members provided expertise and advice during their time on the Board. I thank them for their contribution and look forward to working with the new members as they begin their terms,” Ms Simmonds says.
HomeNews & EventsNewsNDB Board of Directors Approved City Bank Sustainable Infrastructure Project
On April 1, 2025, the Board of Directors (Board) of the New Development Bank (NDB) approved a loan of up to USD 25 million to City Bank PLC for the City Bank Sustainable Infrastructure Project, the NDB’s first non-sovereign loan in Bangladesh. The Project is co-financed by NDB, and the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB).
The City Bank Sustainable Infrastructure Project will promote sustainable infrastructure projects in Bangladesh by providing medium to long-term financing to the private sector, fostering sustainable economic growth. The Project will support private sector participation in infrastructure development in the country and also support climate change mitigation measures in Bangladesh.
The loan will be utilized by City Bank PLC, one of the largest and oldest private commercial banks in the People’s Republic of Bangladesh established in 1983, for on-lending to sub-borrowers for financing investments in infrastructure projects in clean energy and energy efficiency, digital infrastructure and e-mobility sectors.
Background Information
NDB was established by Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa to mobilize resources for infrastructure and sustainable development projects in BRICS and other emerging market economies and developing countries, complementing the existing efforts of multilateral and regional financial institutions for global growth and development.
Progress continues in nuclear waste management, with the outdoor dry storage project at Kuosheng Nuclear Power Plant set to commence construction. A Taipower representative pointed out that, in 2015, the soil and water conservation plan for the outdoor dry storage facility at Kuosheng was approved by the Council of Agriculture (now the Ministry of Agriculture). Subsequently, after nine years of effort, the Construction Site Plan for Reduction of Pollutants from Runoff Wastewater required for building the dry storage facility was approved by the New Taipei City Government this past August (2024). Approval for construction commencement was granted in November. Today (December 31), Taipower held a groundbreaking ceremony to mark the start of construction, symbolizing a solid first step in the steady progress toward nuclear power decommissioning.
A Taipower representative explained that the outdoor dry storage facility at Kuosheng will use dry storage casks designed by NAC International, a nuclear equipment company based in the US. A total of 27 casks are planned for the outdoor facility, with each cask capable of storing 87 spent fuel assemblies. Construction is expected to be completed by 2026. After obtaining a completion certificate from the New Taipei City Government, the facility will undergo commissioning tests, including cold tests and hot tests; then, Taipower will apply to the Nuclear Safety Commission for an operating license. Taipower projects obtaining the license in 2027.
A Taipower representative stated that the dry storage facility is a critical preliminary component of the decommissioning project. Only after construction is completed and an operating license is obtained can the spent nuclear fuel be gradually removed from the reactor, and only then can the decommissioning process be implemented at full scale. During construction, all work will be carried out in strict accordance with the approved Environmental Impact Statement and Soil and Water Conservation Plan. Taipower will closely monitor construction quality and ensure that all work complies with nuclear safety regulations and occupational safety and quality control standards, as Taipower completes this key project in the decommissioning of Kuosheng Nuclear Power Plant.
Spokesperson: Vice President Tsai Chih-Meng Phone: (02) 2366-6271/0958-749-333 Email: u910707@taipower.com.tw
Contact Person: Department of Nuclear Back-end Management Director Liao Ying-Chen Phone: (02)2365-7210 ext. 2200/0953-685-053 Email: u880803@taipower.com.tw
The Taiwan Corporate Sustainability Awards, known as the “Oscars of Corporate Sustainability”, held their award ceremony today (December 11). Taipower stood out among 526 companies to win the Corporate Sustainability Report Platinum Award, as well as a Best Sustainability Practice Awards in Taiwan and a Creative Communication Leadership Award. Notably, Taipower has been recognized in the Sustainability Reporting category for 16 years in a row since 2009. This also marks the sixth time the Company has received the Platinum Award, the highest honor in the Energy Industry category. A Taipower representative stated that because electricity is a vital foundation for Taiwan’s livelihood and economic development, Taipower remains committed to ensuring both stable power supply and environmental sustainability.
For the 17th Taiwan Corporate Sustainability Awards in 2024, the individual performance awards were presented on November 20. Then, today, the award ceremony for the Sustainability Reporting and Comprehensive Sustainability Performance categories was held today at the Grand Hilai Taipei hotel. Department of Corporate Planning Director Kuo Chiu-Ying represented Taipower in accepting the prestigious awards from Eugene Chien, Chairman of the Taiwan Institute for Sustainable Energy.
A Taipower representative pointed out that winning a Corporate Sustainability Report Platinum Award and a Best Sustainability Practice Awards ( Comprehensive Performance Category) this year highlights the Company’s outstanding achievements in three aspects – environmental sustainability, social inclusion, and corporate governance – and in thoroughly and transparently disclosing this information in the sustainability report. Taipower’s 2023 Sustainability Report outlines the Company’s comprehensive sustainability development plan, presenting five sustainability visions, ten strategic pathways, and initiatives corresponding to each. These efforts align with both the United Nations and Taiwan’s sustainable development goals (SDGs). This year, the report places even greater emphasis on disclosing information in key areas such as climate action, sustainable supply chain development, and ecological inclusion, showcasing Taipower’s concrete actions toward achieving sustainable operations.
In recent years, Taipower has continuously advanced renewable energy development, promoted modernization for low-carbon power generation, and adopted new energy technologies, steadily progressing toward the goal of net-zero emissions for the power sector. In addition, Taipower embraces the spirit of other effective area-based conservation measures (OECMs), applying nature-based solutions to foster harmony between power infrastructure and ecological systems, and thus protecting biodiversity and the natural environment. Examples include using conservation efforts at the Yong’an Wetlands near the Hsinta Power Plant to create a Flying Bird Power Plant; and implementing a bat habitat relocation project at the Taixi Wind Plant.
A Taipower representative explained that this is the Company’s fifth time receiving the Creative Communication Leadership Award in the corporate governance category of the Sustainability Performance Awards. The Company has continued to promote popular science education on electricity through initiatives tailored to audiences of all ages. These initiatives include helping create the Taiwan Science Train and the Workplace Visitation Program for Youth; organizing the kW Design Award, Taiwan’s only electricity-themed design competition; and creating TAIPOWER D/S ONE, Taiwan’s first green energy-themed exhibition hall. Through these diverse, creative, interactive platforms, Taipower effectively connects knowledge of power to everyday life. In recognition of these efforts, Taipower was also honored with a Taiwan Sustainability Action Award at the 2024 SDG Asia this August.
Spokesperson: Vice President Tsai Chih-Meng Phone: (02) 2366-6271/0958-749-333 Email: u910707@taipower.com.tw Contact Person: Department of Corporate Planning Director Kuo Chiu-Ying Phone: (02) 2366-6440/0978-105-282 Email: u004770@taipower.com.tw
The Hsiehho Power Plant Redevelopment Project (“HPPRP”) has passed Environmental Impact Assessment Review Committee (“EIA Review Committee”) review. In response to this, today (February 26), Taipower expressed gratitude for the support and guidance from EIA Review Committee members and all stakeholders. Since its initial proposal, the HPPRP has undergone seven years of EIA review. Through discussion of rationality and specialized analysis under the EIA framework, the HPPRP has been continuously refined to produce an optimal plan that ensures the public’s right to electricity while minimizing environmental impacts. A Taipower representative emphasized that maintaining a stable power supply and meeting the electricity needs of both the public and industries is the Company’s mission. The Company looks forward to working together with all sectors to promote Hsiehho’s redevelopment as soon as possible, in order to provide reliable power to the Taipei, New Taipei, and Keelung areas while also satisfying local demand for improved air quality.
A Taipower representative pointed out that all information required by the EIA review has been investigated and truthfully provided, in accordance with the law. Based on the conclusions of today’s meeting, Taipower will also supplement additional materials requested and will faithfully implement the HPPRP in line with its environmental commitments. Regarding the issue of soil contamination within the Hsiehho Power Plant site, Taipower has also pledged to complete remediation of the contaminated land before construction of the new units officially begins, in compliance with the regulations of the Soil and Groundwater Pollution Remediation Act.
A Taipower representative explained that the EIA process for the HPPRP began at the end of 2017. Over the years, Taipower staff have dedicated significant time and effort, incorporating suggestions from EIA Review Committee members and different sectors of society to continuously optimize the plan. Version 1.0 of the plan included 29.25 hectares of land reclamation, but in order to reduce impacts on Waimushan Fishing Port, Taipower proactively revised the plan and proposed Version 2.0 with a reduced scale. Later, in response to local concerns about coral reefs near the submerged breakwater area, Taipower developed Version 3.0, known as the “Eastward Shift Plan”, which relocated and further reduced the reclamation area to maximize marine ecological protection, applying the ecological conservation strategy of “avoidance, minimization, mitigation, and compensation”. In addition, to address local concerns regarding the impact of the receiving terminal on shipping operations at Keelung Port, Taipower collaborated with experts, scholars, and local stakeholders to conduct thorough research. This ensured that port safety and operations will not be compromised, and that the HPPRP and Keelung Port can coexist and thrive together.
A Taipower representative stated that even as power generation units within the northern and eastern power grids are gradually decommissioned, electricity demand in the Taipei, New Taipei, and Keelung areas continues to grow due to ongoing economic development. The HPPRP therefore serves a significant public interest by ensuring a stable power supply and improving air quality. Taipower thanks all sectors for the support, and will continued working hard and communicating more deeply to jointly promote power stability and local development for the Taipei-New Taipei-Keelung region.
Spokesperson: Vice President Tsai Chih-Meng Phone: (02) 2366-6271/0958-749-333 Email: u910707@taipower.com.tw
Contact Person: Department of Environmental Protection Director Wu Cheng-Hung Wu Phone: (02) 2366-7200/0927-291-156 Email: u015279@taipower.com.tw
For over a decade, Taipower has been dedicated to conserving Kaohsiung’s Yong’an Wetland and creating a haven for black-faced spoonbills there. Through scientific management and water level control technology, the wetland has been transformed into a welcoming ‘Waterbird Hotel’ – an ideal migratory bird habitat and feeding ground. Since autumn last year (2024), the site has hosted hundreds of migratory birds, including globally endangered species such as the black-faced spoonbill (Platalea minor), northern shoveler (Spatula clypeata), and Eurasian wigeon (Mareca penelope).
Integrating the wetland’s unique features into its operations, Hsinta Power Plant developed an environmental education program that has been certified by the Ministry of Environment. This makes it the first thermal power plant in Taiwan to be officially designated as an environmental education site. The unveiling ceremony was held today (January 3). A Taipower representative stated that while Taipower remains committed to its mission of ensuring stable power supply, it will also continue promoting environmental education and preserving the biodiversity of the Yong’an Wetland, so that these feathered guests can enjoy a cozy winter and make every visit a happy ‘Bird-Day’.
Taipower held the Yong’an Wetland Migratory Bird Season and Environmental Education Site Unveiling Ceremony today at the Yong’an Wetland Ecological Education Center in Kaohsiung. The event was attended by distinguished guests, including Taipower Chairman Tseng Wen-Sheng; Kaohsiung City Government Public Works Bureau Director Yang Chin-Fu; Kaohsiung City Government Environmental Protection Bureau Deputy Director Huang Shih-Hung; and former Kaohsiung City Government Advisor Tsan-Cheng Lin. Together, they jointly unveiled the plaque. Students and teachers from Yong’an Elementary School and Xingang Elementary School were also invited to participate in birdwatching activities, enthusiastically welcoming the start of the migratory bird season at Yong’an Wetland.
Ecological restoration success – black-faced spoonbill population quadruples in 10 years
A Taipower representative stated that in 2010, the Company established an ecological survey team and launched ecological conservation research. Since then, they have collected over 500,000 waterbird and water depth observations. Through scientific management and water level control technology, the number of waterbirds at Yong’an Wetland has increased significantly, with the black-faced spoonbill population growing fourfold over the past decade. Today, Yong’an Wetland has become a winter sanctuary for migratory birds. As early as last October, black-faced spoonbills had already been spotted, and recently, charming visitors such as black-winged stilts (Himantopus himantopus), northern shovelers, and Eurasian wigeons have also been seen.
A Taipower representative explained that Yong’an Wetland was originally developed as the Wushulin Salt Fields during the Japanese colonial period. In 1984, with the transformation of the salt industry, the land ownership was transferred to Taipower for power development purposes. However, Taipower not only preserved the Wushulin Salt Manufacturing Company Office – a County-designated historic site – but also made efforts to minimize the scope of development. Taipower retained two-thirds of the site as environmental conservation land, deliberately avoiding key bird habitats. The overall plan designates 41.25 hectares as wetland conservation area and 15 hectares as an ecological buffer zone with greenbelts and protected areas. Statistics show that over 160 species of birds have been recorded visiting the site. The notable phenomenon of “migratory birds becoming resident birds” has also been observed, with species such as the Kentish plover (Anarhynchus alexandrines) and black-winged stilt now settling and breeding in the area.
Taipower also collaborated with internationally-acclaimed, award-winning director Hsu Hung-Lung to produce the documentary film “Flying Bird Power Plant”. The film records Taipower’s efforts and achievements in ecological conservation. The film has earned multiple honors, including a Platinum Remi Award at the 2024 WorldFest-Houston International Film Festival, a Document Special Award at the Accolade Global Film Competition, and an Award of Excellence for Nature/Environment/Wildlife at the All-American Short Film Competition.
Integrating wetland wonders with energy exploration – three different courses to have fun in!
Hsinta Power Plant is the only power plant in Taiwan with a wetland onsite. Taipower has integrated ecological conservation with energy education to develop three courses: Wonders of Hsinta; Eco Task Force; and Chasing the Spark. Led by a team of expert instructors, participants can explore the saltwater wetland ecosystem, observing mangrove plants and aquatic fish, shrimp, and shellfish, while also learning about power generation principles. The courses include hands-on creative activities using byproducts from the power generation process, offering a fun and educational experience.
A Taipower representative stated that Hsinta Power Plant received official certification from the Ministry of Environment as an Environmental Education Facility in September last year. The unveiling ceremony was held today, and the site will be open for reservations starting January 10. (For details, please visit the Hsinta Power Plant Environmental Education website: https://www.hsinta-ee.com.tw/ .) Schools and organizations are welcome to get in touch and schedule visits.
Balancing a stable power supply with ecological conservation: Hsinta’s new Unit 1 undergoing trial operation
To meet growing electricity demand and achieve the net-zero emission goals, Taipower is currently constructing new gas-fired combined cycle units at Hsinta Power Plant. The three new units will have a total installed capacity of 3.9 GW. Construction began in December 2020, and by the end of last year, the project was more than 80% complete. A Taipower representative pointed out that the new Unit 1 first began generating power last September, and is currently undergoing trial operation. The goal is for the unit to be ready for grid dispatch by the end of February, followed by commercial operation. Once officially online, it is expected to generate over 7 TWh of low-carbon electricity per year. Meanwhile, new Units 2 and 3 are currently undergoing mechanical, instrumentation, and electrical installation. They are projected to be gradually connected to the grid starting this year.
Spokesperson: Vice President Tsai Chih-Meng Phone: (02) 2366-6271/0958-749-333 Email: u910707@taipower.com.tw Contact Person: Department of Environmental Protection Director Wu Cheng-Hung Phone: (02) 2366-7200/0927-291-156 Email: u015279@taipower.com.tw
In support of the government’s Deep Energy Savings Promotion Plan, Taipower today (March 27) coordinated with its 24 regional offices across Taiwan to hold a major-user symposium. Nearly 2,000 companies from every industry were invited to participate. The event featured case studies in promoting deep energy-saving practices, and Taipower’s energy diagnosis services. A Taipower representative stated that the Company hopes more businesses will join efforts to save energy, reduce carbon emissions, improve energy efficiency, and take the critical steps toward Taiwan’s 2050 net-zero transition.
On the morning of the 27th, Taipower held the major-user symposium, titled “Taipower Energy Diagnosis Now, Businesses Energy Savings Wow”, in coordination with regional offices all across Taiwan. In particular, the Taipei South Branch, designated as Taipower’s deep energy-saving demonstration site, attracted participation from over 100 companies. Taipower Vice President Chen Ming-Shu also attended the event, joining forces with Taipower’s energy-saving mascot Power Buddy to serve as energy diagnosis ambassadors and promote energy saving among businesses.
Businesses participating in deep energy-saving should begin with energy assessments and diagnosis supported by Taipower. Following this, businesses should collaborate with an Energy/Engineering Service Companies (ESCOs) to implement equipment upgrades, energy management measures, and other improvements that help reduce electricity costs and increase energy efficiency. A Taipower representative noted that, having completed initial diagnosis and then actual improvements, the Ministry of Finance office building now saves 380 MWh annually, the Grand Hotel saves 840 MWh per year, and Far East Century Park Phase I, home to many major tech companies, is saving an impressive 2 GWh per year. A Taipower representative pointed out that in 2019, the Company established energy diagnosis centers in northern, central, and southern Taiwan. These centers use specialized measuring instruments to provide free energy-saving consultations for major electricity users (those contracted for 100 to 800 kW). In 2024, the centers delivered tailored energy-saving assessments to over 300 companies. If the recommended improvements are fully implemented, Taipower estimates that these businesses could collectively save 37 GWh of electricity, equivalent to the annual electricity usage of more than 9,000 households, while also reducing approximately 18,000 metric tons of carbon emissions.
In addition to offering free energy diagnosis services to major electricity users, Taipower is actively supporting the government’s Deep Energy Savings Promotion Plan. The Plan calls on state-owned enterprises and major medical institutions to lead by example, and Taipower has taken the initiative by implementing energy-saving improvement projects at six demonstration sites. These include the Company’s Headquarters Building; the Taiwan Power Research Institute (TPRI)’s Shulin Campus; the Linkou Training Center; and the Taipei Southern, Hsinchu, and Taichung regional offices. At the Taipei Southern Regional Office, for example, Taipower introduced ESCO services and fully upgraded the central air conditioning system, resulting in an estimated annual electricity savings of nearly 1 GWh.
Spokesperson: Vice President Tsai Chih-Meng Phone: (02) 2366-6271/0958-749-333 Email: u910707@taipower.com.tw Contact Person: Department of Business Director Huang Mei-Lien Phone: (02) 2366-6650/0922-696-383 Email: u030573@taipower.com.tw
Mobile phone offence detections have reduced significantly since the introduction of South Australia’s mobile phone detection cameras, but repeat offenders still need to heed the message.
Officer in Charge of SAPOL’s Traffic Services Branch, Superintendent Shane Johnson said mobile phone detection cameras have sent a clear message to drivers that those caught using a mobile phone illegally will be fined.
“The large reduction in offending is a positive result for road safety in South Australia,” Superintendent Johnson said.
Mobile Phone Detection Cameras were introduced in June 2024. In their first three months of operation, there were 64,454 warning letters sent to registered owners as a part of an expiation grace period.
“On 19 September 2024, police commenced enforcement and issued 28,120 expiations in the first three months,” Superintendent Johnson said.
“In the first six months to 18 March, a total of 46,476 expiations were sent to registered owners.
“The downward trend shows that mobile phone detection cameras have made drivers stop and think about their mobile phone use.”
Despite declining offences, police investigations into repeat offenders are underway.
“The number of repeat offenders has been disappointing, and police continue to investigate these offences. These drivers face a loss of licence and significant fines,” said Superintendent Johnson.
Minister for Police Stephen Mullighan MP said:
“These figures show the success of the mobile phone detection cameras is driving down mobile phone use behind the wheel at these key locations.
However it’s clear that there rate of use is still far too high and we have more work to do getting the message through to drivers to leave their phones alone while driving.
If you’re looking at your mobile phone, you’re essentially driving blind, and you’ll face the full force of the law.”
Across the mobile phone detection camera sites, six-month expiation data shows:
12,645 were detected at North South Motorway, Regency Park,
11,828 at South Road, Torrensville,
9,482 at Southern Expressway, Darlington,
8,470 at Port Road, Hindmarsh and
4,051 at Port Wakefield Road, Gepps Cross.
Repeat mobile phone offences numbers attributed to a single registered owner caught between September 19, 2024, and 18 March, 2025 were:
308 were issued with 4 expiation notices
119 were issued with 5 expiation notices
70 were issued with 6 expiation notices
44 were issued with 7 expiation notices
22 were issued with 8 expiation notices
14 were issued with 9 expiation notices
11 were issued with 10 expiation notices
3 were issued with 11 expiation notices
5 were issued with 12 expiation notices
3 were issued with 13 expiation notices
1 was issued with 14 expiation notices
3 were issued with 15 expiation notices
1 was issued with 16 expiation notices
1 was issued with 19 expiation notices
2 were issued with 20 expiation notices
1 was issued with 22 expiation notices
1 was issued with 25 expiation notices
1 was issued with 28 expiation notices
1 was issued with 41 expiation notices
Mobile phone detection cameras were introduced to five high-risk sites across metropolitan Adelaide in June 2024 accompanied by a three-month expiation grace period and a state-wide campaign that warned drivers about the new detection capability.
SA Police began issuing a penalty of $556 plus a $102 Victims of Crime Levy and three demerit points from offences detected by mobile phone detection cameras from 19 September 2024.
Two additional camera locations are currently being considered and expected to be installed in early 2025.
Being distracted by a mobile for two seconds at 60 kilometres an hour means a driver travels 33 metres without their eyes on the road. A driver distracted for two seconds at 100 kilometres an hour means they will travel 55 metres without their eyes on the road.
Visit Think! Road Safety for further information about mobile phone detection cameras.
As a multilateral institution, ADB is instrumental in financing procurement transactions and consulting services for investment projects in Asia and the Pacific.
The 2024 Annual Procurement Report marks a leap forward in how the bank communicates procurement activities and features a wide range of impactful stories from our team.
Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News
The China Pavilion at the Osaka Expo in Japan is captivating visitors with its striking blend of ancient aesthetics and modern technology. Officially opened on April 13, the pavilion spans about 3,500 square meters, making it one of the largest self-built foreign pavilions at the expo. The pavilion is divided into three sections, showcasing China’s traditional ecological wisdom, its modern green development efforts and its vision for global cooperation toward a sustainable future.
Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News
BEIJING, April 14 — A spokesperson for the Hong Kong and Macao Affairs Office of the State Council on Monday pledged efforts to fully support the Macao Special Administrative Region (SAR) in achieving new progress in its high-quality development.
The spokesperson made the remarks following a speech that Sam Hou Fai, the sixth-term chief executive of the Macao SAR, delivered on Monday, which was Sam’s first policy speech since taking office.
Noting that the chief executive’s speech fully demonstrated the reform-minded, innovative, responsible and enterprising spirit of the SAR’s new-term government, the spokesperson said that the central government will spare no effort in backing the SAR government and various sectors of Macao to complete the significant mission of advancing the “one country, two systems” practice.
The speech outlined a vision for — as well as pathways to build — a Macao that is ruled by law, and that is dynamic and brimming with culture and happiness. It also highlighted issues and challenges facing the SAR, and put forward a raft of new approaches and response measures to tackle them, the spokesperson said.
With the strong support of the central government and the mainland, the Macao SAR government and all sectors of Macao’s society will surely give full play to the advantages of the “one country, two systems” policy, proactively seize opportunities, and continuously create new achievements, the spokesperson said.
Thus they will also make new and greater contributions to building a great modern socialist country and achieving the rejuvenation of the Chinese nation by pursuing Chinese modernization, the spokesperson added.
Chris Hipkins hascriticisedthe Associate Health Minister’s move to raise concerns over Health NZ’s practice of avoiding the term ‘woman’ in reference to female patients.
Responding to Hipkins’ comments, ACT MP Karen Chhour says:
“Sometimes the first job of a politician isn’t to speak, but to listen. Chris Hipkins should listen to the women who’ve felt confused and alienated by a health system that refers to them as ‘people with a cervix’ or ‘individuals capable of childbearing’.
“Women don’t want to be erased as a group by a public health system that has an unhealthy obsession with politically correct language. It’s left women feeling disrespected and dehumanised, and I’m glad we’ve now got a Government that is listening.”