Category: Asia Pacific

  • MIL-OSI China: China boosts global confidence for win-win cooperation

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    Beijing, March 26 — Against the backdrop of global economic fragmentation and rising uncertainties, China reaffirmed its commitment to innovation-driven high-quality development and global cooperation at the just-concluded China Development Forum (CDF) 2025.

    Chinese Premier Li Qiang, who delivered a keynote speech at the opening ceremony of CDF 2025, underscored China’s commitment to its 2025 growth target of around 5 percent, signaling strong confidence in the country’s economic prospects.

    The decision reflects both China’s profound understanding of its economic conditions, and confidence in its governance capacity and future development potential, Li said, calling for the combination of more proactive and impactful macro policies with structural reforms, and voicing hope that China will continue to welcome enterprises from around the world with open arms.

    The premier added that the country will safeguard free trade, and contribute to the smooth and stable operation of global industrial and supply chains.

    Themed “Unleashing Development Momentum for Stable Growth of Global Economy,” the high-profile gathering held from March 23 to 24 in Beijing brought together Chinese policymakers, global business leaders, and leading international scholars to chart a course for sustainable growth amid uncertainties.

    “China is open for business and China is set for growth,” said Ola Kallenius, chairman of the board of management of Mercedes-Benz Group AG, on the sidelines of the event.

    STABILITY AMID UNCERTAINTIES

    As the theme of stability resonated throughout the forum discussions, Han Wenxiu, executive deputy director of the Office of the Central Committee for Financial and Economic Affairs, provided insight into China’s economic resilience and stability to counteract global uncertainties.

    “Amid rising external instability and uncertainty, China will remain firmly focused on pursuing its own development, leveraging the certainty of high-quality growth to offset external uncertainties and striving to serve as a stabilizing anchor for the global economy,” Han added.

    International observers echoed confidence in China’s economic prospects. Jeffrey Sachs, renowned economist and director of Columbia University’s Center for Sustainable Development, told Xinhua that China’s around-5-percent growth target is “perfectly achievable,” adding that the country is “booming in key sectors, especially digital, artificial intelligence, robotics, and this is going to propel a Chinese growth.”

    In the eyes of Standard Chartered Group Chief Executive Bill Winters, China’s growth story has shifted. “It is now about transformation and unleashing new productive forces to flourish to support high-quality growth,” he said.

    A PwC report released at the CDF noted that over the past two years, driven by new quality productive forces, China has demonstrated a commercial evolution path distinct from those of the traditional industrialized nations, marked by improvements in production factors, transformations in business models, and the intelligent reshaping of industrial chains.

    “This has opened up new opportunities for global business investment and development in China, highlighting the new advantages of the Chinese market during the global economic transition period,” the report read.

    INNOVATION AS NEW GROWTH ENGINE

    Finance Minister Lan Fo’an offered concrete details about China’s supportive fiscal policies, emphasizing their role in stimulating innovation and consumption. “We’re implementing targeted measures to convert potential demand into real growth drivers,” Lan explained.

    “This includes increasing fiscal support for tech innovation and providing tangible assistance to private enterprises.” He specifically highlighted plans to “accelerate the development of new quality productive forces” through strategic investments in artificial intelligence (AI) and other cutting-edge technologies.

    Data showcased China’s progress: its global innovation index ranking rose to 11th in 2024, with 19.6 percent, 27 percent, 64 percent, and 91.5 percent year-on-year growth in semiconductor wafers, industrial robots, bullet trains, and drones respectively in early 2024.

    The nation’s emphasis on innovation as a driver for high-quality growth resonated strongly throughout the forum. Siemens AG President and CEO Roland Busch pointed to China’s advances in AI and high-tech manufacturing.

    “China gave the answer for where growth would come from: Growth from high tech, growth by higher efficiency, and high-quality growth,” he remarked, adding that China surprises the world with innovations like the open foundational model R-1 developed by DeepSeek.

    Kallenius also praised China’s innovation-driven market. “China’s competitive advantage lies in its passion for innovation,” he said. “That is why Mercedes-Benz continues to deepen its presence in China.”

    Reflecting this trend, AstraZeneca CEO Pascal Soriot emphasized the country’s emergence as a global leader in life sciences. “Today, China is home to one of AstraZeneca’s Global R&D Centres, where our researchers in Shanghai are spearheading 20 global clinical trials and advancing over 200 pipeline projects,” he said.

    Prior to the forum, the British pharmaceutical giant signed a landmark 2.5-billion-U.S. dollar agreement on Friday to invest in Beijing over the next five years, the largest single investment in Beijing’s biopharmaceutical sector in recent years.

    Under the agreement, AstraZeneca will establish a global strategic R&D center in Beijing, its sixth worldwide and second in China after one in Shanghai. The new center, equipped with an advanced AI and data science laboratory, will accelerate early-stage drug research and clinical development.

    “Looking ahead, China will not only serve as a global innovation hub but also a core arena for setting standards and reshaping industrial chains,” the PwC report added.

    OPEN COLLABORATION FOR SHARED FUTURE

    From CDF 2025 in Beijing to the Boao Forum for Asia (BFA) Annual Conference 2025 in south China’s Hainan Province, foreign executives reaffirmed their commitment to China as a key market for investment and collaboration: China’s complete industrial system, rich application scenarios, vast market scale, and large talent pool offer extensive collaboration opportunities for international industrial and technological innovation.

    The Japanese Chamber of Commerce and Industry in China said in its latest survey that 58 percent of its member firms plan to expand or maintain investments in China through 2025, while 53 percent of U.S. companies are expected to invest more in the country, according to the American Chamber of Commerce in China.

    BMW AG Chairman Oliver Zipse stressed that “economic prosperity comes from openness, not protectionism,” while criticizing trade barriers. “The best response to ‘de-risking’ strategies is more cooperation, not less.”

    Speaking to global business leaders attending the CDF, Lan also emphasized that China’s fiscal policy will support high-standard opening up, and that China will ensure equal treatment for all types of business entities and continue to improve the business environment.

    “For global companies, China’s commitment to high-tech innovation and open collaboration makes it an indispensable partner for long-term growth,” said Busch, highlighting China’s rapid technological advancements and collaborative spirit.

    Jean-Pascal Tricoire, chairman of Schneider Electric, said: “China is not only our second-largest worldwide market but it’s also a vital source of innovation.” For the French industrial giant, China will remain a key partner as it navigates the complexities of a rapidly changing world, he added.

    While China accelerates its push toward innovation-led growth and deepens its commitment to openness, global businesses continue to see the country as a critical partner in achieving long-term economic prosperity, and as the premier put it, there is a growing need for countries to open their markets and for enterprises to share resources, in order to address challenges and pursue common prosperity.

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI Global: Politicians’ attacks on immigrants lack solid evidence: New data set the record straight

    Source: The Conversation – Canada – By Edward Koning, Associate professor, University of Guelph

    Immigration dominated recent election campaigns in countries that include the United Kingdom, France, Germany and the United States.

    The subject sparked particularly fierce debates over welfare. While some politicians called for more support for typically economically vulnerable immigrant populations, others argued that welfare systems are already too generous and accommodating to newcomers.

    Unfortunately, many debates on this subject lack solid evidence. A newly launched data set could change that. The data, which provides systematic information on immigrants’ access to social programs across different countries and different time periods, can help ground some of these discussions in empirical reality.

    The data set reveals key insights. One striking observation is that the countries where politicians most frequently complain that immigrants are treated too generously are among the most exclusionary from a comparative perspective.

    It also shows that although most welfare systems were moving towards greater inclusion up until the 2010s, since then social programs in many countries have become more inclusive in some respects but more exclusive in others.

    A new data set for 22 countries

    The data set, called the Immigrant Exclusion from Social Programs Index (IESPI), measures how much immigrants’ access to pensions, health care, unemployment benefits, housing benefits, social assistance and active labour market programs compares to that of native-born citizens.

    The index uses 32 indicators to measure factors like whether immigrants have to have resided in the country for a certain period of time, held a specific type of residence status, or met standards of successful integration before they can access social programs.

    The data covers the years 1990 to 2023 and includes information for 22 countries.

    Complaints about inclusion

    In the United States, President Donald Trump has voiced concerns about immigrants’ welfare access repeatedly, both during his first term and since taking office again this year.

    In last year’s British election, a staple of Rishi Sunak’s campaign was the insistence that immigrants threaten the sustainability of the welfare state.

    On the other side of the North Sea, the political party that won the Dutch elections made the argument that immigrants are “pampered” a central feature of its election platform.

    Ironically, all three of these countries are among the most exclusionary, according to the most recent IESPI data, as the graph below illustrates. (Note that the IESPI is organized such that a value of 0 is maximally inclusionary and 100 is maximally exclusionary.)

    Inclusionary trends have ended

    A second observation is that the era of social welfare systems becoming more inclusive for immigrants has ended.

    From 1990 until the 2010s, most western welfare systems were removing barriers for immigrant access to social programs. But since then, levels of immigrant welfare exclusion have not changed dramatically over time.

    Closer inspection shows that this picture of stability since the 2010s hides negative trends in different social programs.

    On the one hand, health-care programs and active labour market policies have gradually become more inclusionary. More and more countries have been making health-care services accessible for vulnerable immigrant populations, and rolling out targeted programs to improve newcomers’ chances on the labour market.

    On the other hand, social assistance policies have generally become more exclusionary over time. Many countries have intensified restrictions for recent arrivals, migrants without permanent residence status and migrants who cannot demonstrate successful integration.

    Large differences in historical trajectories

    When we look beyond aggregate trends, we also note very different trajectories in different countries.

    In some countries (Austria, Germany, Finland, Iceland, Malta, New Zealand, Portugal and Spain), social programs have become consistently more inclusionary.

    Other countries (Canada, Luxembourg and Sweden) have also undergone an inclusionary development, although at a more modest pace of change.

    In a third set of countries (Australia, Belgium, Denmark, France, Ireland, Italy, Norway and Switzerland), policies initially became more inclusionary but this trend was halted or reversed around 2010. The social programs of three other countries (the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and the United States), finally, have consistently become more exclusionary over time.

    These comparisons within the IESPI data set hopefully enable us to make sense of the frequently charged nature of discussions about immigrants’ access to social programs.

    Most obviously, they show we should be cautious when listening to some of the politicians who are most critical of immigrant welfare access, like Donald Trump, Rishi Sunak and Geert Wilders.

    If their arguments that exclusionary reforms in their countries are nothing but reasonable adjustments to overly generous approaches ever had any merit, that merit is quickly evaporating.

    Edward Koning received funding from the Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada to collect the data for this project.

    ref. Politicians’ attacks on immigrants lack solid evidence: New data set the record straight – https://theconversation.com/politicians-attacks-on-immigrants-lack-solid-evidence-new-data-set-the-record-straight-251853

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI Banking: Sanjay Malhotra: Address – Private Sector Collaborative Forum of the Financial Action Task Force

    Source: Bank for International Settlements

    It is a pleasure to be here at the Private Sector Collaborative Forum (PSCF) 2025 of the Financial Action Task Force. I am happy to note that this is the first time that the forum is being held in India. I thank FATF for giving us this opportunity. In my previous role as the Secretary in the Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, I had the opportunity of being closely associated with the FATF during our mutual evaluation last year.

    About FATF

    Financial Action Task Force (FATF), the standard setting body for illicit financing has come a long way since its establishment in 1989. Over the years, it has evolved from an organisation with only 16 members to a global forum with 40 members. Through the FATF-styled regional bodies1, its reach is even wider. The standards developed by FATF are used by over 200 jurisdictions to combat money laundering (ML), terrorism financing (TF) and proliferation financing. The implementation of the standards has played an important role in strengthening the global financial system and making the world a safer place.

    India’s Mutual Evaluation by FATF

    India accords immense importance to Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Countering the Financing of Terrorism (CFT). Last year, India underwent the mutual evaluation by the FATF. India was placed in the ‘regular follow-up’ category, a distinction shared by only a few other G20 countries2. This is a recognition of our effective AML and CFT framework. It demonstrates our commitment to AML and CFT. This is a result of many years of building and continuously improving and strengthening the financial system of our country.

    This was possible due to the collaborative efforts of all stakeholders, led by the Government of India including financial entities and designated non-financial businesses and professions in the private and public sector, regulators, and the state governments. The private sector plays a vital role in keeping the financial systems secure. Their role in implementing due diligence procedures, conducting robust risk assessments, monitoring transactions, and reporting suspicious activities is critical for preventing the abuse of the financial system. They identify suspicious activities and help government agencies in destroying illicit financial networks.

    Strong public-private partnerships form the bedrock for safeguarding the integrity of the financial system. In India, we recognize the importance of close cooperation between public and private sector stakeholders in achieving these goals. Reserve Bank of India, as the regulator and supervisor of a large segment of the financial system in India has diligently and consistently worked towards building and ensuring implementation of a strong AML and CFT framework in this segment of the financial system, in line with FATF recommendations. The Reserve Bank has taken several initiatives to enhance cooperation and coordination with various stakeholders. Similarly, the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU)-India has also set up FPAC3, a public-private cooperation forum for facilitating closer interaction and collaboration. It has also supported the setting up of ARIFAC4 – a cross sectoral forum for the private sector reporting entities to collaborate among themselves.

    It is a result of these collaborative efforts that we have been able to build and demonstrate a robust and resilient AML and CFT framework. I compliment all the stakeholders, especially, the regulated entities in the financial sector as well as the designated non-financial businesses and professions for the successful mutual evaluation.

    However, as all of you are aware, the threats from money laundering and terror financing to the national and global financial systems are continuously evolving and becoming more sophisticated. This is primarily due to technological advancements. In order to effectively counter these threats, we need to continue the close cooperation among various stakeholders – government agencies, financial entities in both the public and private sectors, civil society, and others.

    The mutual evaluation process was rigorous and detailed. While providing us with valuable insights into our strengths, it has highlighted some areas of improvement in our AML-CFT framework. We are determined to further strengthen our financial system to deter and combat illicit financial activities taking into consideration the recommendations made during the evaluation. We will continue to strive for continuous improvement in this regard.

    Some thoughts on the Agenda for PSCF 2025

    I am told that yesterday’s sessions were very engaging and produced lively discussions. Looking at the agenda for today and tomorrow, I am confident that the deliberations on contemporary topics such as evolving AML-CFT landscape, financial inclusion & humanitarian channels, risk-based approach to supervision, digitalization & information sharing, beneficial ownership and countering of proliferation financing, will also be exciting. Let me outline some of my thoughts for the forum on these areas.

    First, while we all continue to make our financial systems safe and secure against money laundering and terror financing, we as policy makers need to be mindful that our measures are not over-zealous and do not stifle legitimate activities and investments. You would appreciate that multiple laws and rules, each with their own level of granularity cast a high level of burden of compliance on the regulated financial service providers. This is relevant in the context of AML-CFT too. Therefore, we need to have laws and regulations which, with surgical precision, target only the illegitimate and illicit, rather than use them as blunt tools which unintentionally hurt even the honest.

    Similarly, even while implementing the legal framework and regulations, we need to keep in mind the impact on persons and businesses. Risk-based approach is recommended in this regard. But let us keep in mind that this is only a step forward in reducing compliance burden. Let us appreciate that it is not the ultimate solution, as any risk-based approach is not perfect; it would have false positives and false negatives. We need to continuously refine and improve our risk assessment models to make them robust.

    To make these improvements, we need to improve the quality of our data and harness emerging technologies. This will help improve screening of transactions and detection of suspicious activities thereby reducing false positives and false negatives. Considering the evolving landscape in the area of money laundering resulting from changing customer behaviour and evolving products and services, we need to continuously augment AML risk assessment framework and make appropriate system enhancements on a regular basis after assessing the impact of ML and other risks. The focus has to also be on understanding the latest trends and developments in the financial world that can be exploited by criminals and accordingly develop tools and enabling frameworks that will allow us to detect suspicious transactions and activities early and take pre-emptive action. With the adoption of new technological tools and models, I am sure that AML-CFT risk assessments can be further fine-tuned. I would urge you all to discuss and share best practices in identification, mitigation and supervision of AML-CFT risks. This will not only help to reduce compliance burden on the Regulated Entities but also result in optimal allocation of supervisory resources.

    While India has made remarkable progress in financial inclusion, we need to ensure that we continue to widen and deepen it. The discussions on FATF standards to promote financial inclusion need to find answers to the challenge of aligning financial inclusion and financial integrity, especially for the developing economies. It must be ensured that regulations do not create unintended barriers to financial inclusion. We need to be mindful of customer rights and convenience while fulfilling the due diligence requirements. I am happy to note that the amendments to Recommendation 1 and its interpretive note under the Mexican presidency intend to foster and promote financial inclusion without compromising on financial integrity. Similar approach is needed to extend access of financial channels for supporting humanitarian aid.

    In recent years, digitalisation has been increasingly applied to customer onboarding and customer due diligence (CDD) processes. India has made huge strides in this regard too. The digital KYC and video KYC are shining examples of this. The Central KYC Records Registry (CKYCR) with more than one billion records is another example, which has the potential of ushering in a new era of customer onboarding by making it easier and seamless not only for customers but also for regulated entities to perform customer identification and due diligence. I am told there is a separate session to deliberate on the state of play of technical solutions in customer due diligence area. The discussions could be helpful in further enhancing the capability and utility of CKYCR manifold.

    Further, during the process of CDD, reporting entities collect a large amount of data from the customers. Moreover, there are requirements of sharing of information with Financial Intelligence Units, law enforcement agencies and data registries leading to concerns regarding data protection and sharing of information without consent. India has recently enacted a law for Digital Personal Data Protection. Exchange of experiences from different jurisdictions will help us in better implementing the law in our country.

    Another important area which needs discussion is the travel rule. In today’s world, fast payment systems are revolutionizing financial access and deepening financial inclusion. Developing countries like India have made huge progress in making digital payments accessible, affordable, and convenient. While card networks have helped developed economies in improving payment systems, fast payment systems have assisted Emerging Market and Developing Economies (EMDEs) leapfrog in this area. We have also enabled cross border payments using fast payment systems with a few countries. We will continue to work towards fulfilling our commitment to the effective implementation of the next phase of G20 roadmap towards inclusive cross-border payments by 2027. In this context, the ongoing discussions on FATF Recommendation 16 (R.16), known as the travel rule, assume importance. To meet the G20 objective of making cross-border payments faster, cheaper, more transparent and more inclusive, while maintaining their safety and security, it would be desirable to make the travel rule technology-neutral.

    Lastly, discussions regarding combating proliferation financing and sanctions evasion need to answer questions related to identification of products and services which are most vulnerable to exploitation and the mitigation of the risks related to such products. This forum can discuss the best practices as well as challenges in this regard.

    Conclusion

    To conclude, I would like to stress that through our collaborative efforts, we can safeguard the trust that underpins the global financial framework. Together, let us continue to collaborate and innovate in building a financial ecosystem that is not only safe and secure but also fast, convenient, accessible and affordable. Let us build financial systems that not only thwart the attempts of money laundering, terror financing and proliferation financing, but also support financial inclusion, encourage innovation, and facilitate economic growth. In the end, I wish the forum very fruitful and productive deliberations.

    Thank you.


    MIL OSI Global Banks

  • MIL-OSI Global: From Greenland to Fort Bragg, America is caught in a name game where place names become political tools

    Source: The Conversation – USA – By Seth T. Kannarr, PhD Candidate in Geography, University of Tennessee

    President Donald Trump re-renamed Denali as Mount McKinley in 2025. Tim Rains/National Park Service, CC BY

    Place names are more than just labels on a map. They influence how people learn about the world around them and perceive their place in it.

    Names can send messages and suggest what is and isn’t valued in society. And the way that they are changed over time can signal cultural shifts.

    The United States is in the midst of a place-renaming moment. From the renaming of the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America, to the return of Forts Bragg and Benning and the newly re-renamed Mount McKinley in Alaska’s Denali National Park, we are witnessing a consequential shift in the politics of place naming.

    This sudden rewriting of the nation’s map – done to “restore American greatness,” according to President Donald Trump’s executive order that made some of them official – is part of a name game that recognizes place names as powerful brands and political tools.

    In our research on place naming, we explore how this “name game” is used to assert control over shared symbols and embed subtle and not-so-subtle messages in the landscape.

    As geography teachers and researchers, we also recognize the educational and emotional impact the name game can have on the public.

    Place names can have psychological effects

    Renaming a place is always an act of power.

    People in power have long used place naming to claim control over the identity of the place, bolster their reputations, retaliate against opponents and achieve political goals.

    These moves can have strong psychological effects, particularly when the name evokes something threatening. Changing a place name can fundamentally shift how people view, relate to or feel that they belong within that place.

    In Shenandoah County, Virginia, students at two schools originally named for Confederate generals have been on an emotional roller coaster of name changes in recent years. The schools were renamed Mountain View and Honey Run in 2020 amid the national uproar over the murder of George Floyd, a Black man killed by a police officer in Minneapolis.

    Four years later, the local school board reinstated the original Confederate names after conservatives took control of the board.

    One Black eighth grader at Mountain View High School — now re-renamed Stonewall Jackson High School — testified at a board meeting about how the planned change would affect her:

    “I would have to represent a man that fought for my ancestors to be slaves. If this board decides to restore the names, I would not feel like I was valued and respected,” she said. The board still approved the change, 5-1.

    Even outside of schools, place names operate as a “hidden curriculum.” They provide narratives to the public about how the community or nation sees itself – as well as whose histories and perspectives it considers important or worthy of public attention.

    Place names affect how people perceive, experience and emotionally connect to their surroundings in both conscious and subconscious ways. Psychologists, sociologists and geographers have explored how this sense of place manifests itself into the psyche, creating either attachment or aversion to place, whether it’s a school, mountain or park.

    A tale of two forts

    Renaming places can rally a leader’s supporters through rebranding.

    Trump’s orders to restore the names Fort Bragg and Fort Benning, both originally named for Confederate generals, illustrate this effect. The names were changed to Fort Liberty and Fort Moore in 2023 after Congress passed a law banning the use of Confederate names for federal installations.

    Veterans and other guests posed in 2023 next to a newly unveiled sign for Fort Moore, named for Lt. Gen. Harold ‘Hal’ Moore, who served in Vietnam, and his wife, Julia Moore. In 2025, President Donald Trump reverted the name back to Fort Benning.
    Cheney Orr/AFP via Getty Images

    Trump made a campaign promise to his followers to “bring back the name” of Fort Bragg if reelected.

    To get around the federal ban, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth identified two unrelated decorated Army veterans with the same last names — Bragg and Benning — but without any Confederate connections, to honor instead.

    Call it a sleight of hand or a stroke of genius if you’d like, this tactic allowed the Department of Defense to revive politically charged names without violating the law.

    A soldier walks beside a sign that was unveiled when Fort Liberty was rededicated as Fort Bragg during a ceremony on base on March 7, 2025.
    AP Photo/Chris Seward

    The restoration of the names Bragg and Benning may feel like a symbolic homecoming for those who resisted the original name change or have emotional ties to the names through their memories of living and serving on the base, rather than a connection to the specific namesakes.

    However, the names are still reminders of the military bases’ original association with defenders of slavery.

    The place-renaming game

    A wave of place-name changes during the Obama and Biden administrations focused on removing offensive or derogatory place names and recognizing Indigenous names.

    For example, Clingmans Dome, the highest peak in the Great Smoky Mountains, was renamed to Kuwohi in September 2024, shifting the name from a Confederate general to a Cherokee word meaning “the mulberry place.”

    Under the Trump administration, however, place-name changes are being advanced explicitly to push back against reform efforts, part of a broader assault on what Trump calls “woke culture.”

    The view from a lookout tower on Kuwohi, formerly known as Clingmans Dome, in the Great Smoky Mountains.
    National Park Service



    Read more:
    From Confederate general to Cherokee heritage: Why returning the name Kuwohi to the Great Smoky Mountains matters


    President Barack Obama changed Alaska’s Mount McKinley to Denali in 2015 to acknowledge Indigenous heritage and a long-standing name for the mountain. Officials in Alaska had requested the name change to Denali years earlier and supported the name change in 2015.

    Trump, on his first day in office in January 2025, moved to rename Denali back to Mount McKinley, over the opposition of Republican politicians in Alaska. The state Legislature passed a resolution a few days later asking Trump to reconsider.

    Georgia Rep. Earl “Buddy” Carter made a recent legislative proposal to rename Greenland as “Red, White, and Blueland” in support of Trump’s expansionist desire to purchase the island, which is an autonomous territory of Denmark.

    Danish officials and Greenlanders saw Carter’s absurd proposal as insulting and damaging to diplomatic relations. It is not the first time that place renaming has been used as a form of symbolic insult in international relations.

    Renaming the Gulf of Mexico to Gulf of America might have initially seemed improbable, but it is already reflected in common navigation apps.

    Google Maps displays the name ‘Gulf of America’ instead of Gulf of Mexico in March 2025.
    Google INEGI



    Read more:
    Yes, Trump can rename the Gulf of Mexico – just not for everyone. Here’s how it works


    A better way to choose place names

    When leaders rename a place in an abrupt, unilateral fashion — often for ideological reasons — they risk alienating communities that deeply connect with those names as a form of memory, identity and place attachment.

    A better alternative, in our view, would be to make renaming shared landscapes participatory, with opportunities for meaningful public involvement in the renaming process.

    This approach does not avoid name changes, but it suggests the changes should respond to the social and psychological needs of communities and the evolving cultural identity of places — and not simply be used to score political points.

    Instead, encouraging public participation — such as through landscape impact assessments and critical audits that take the needs of affected communities seriously — can cultivate a sense of shared ownership in the decision that may give those names more staying power.

    The latest place renamings are already affecting the classroom experience. Students are not just memorizing new place labels, but they are also being asked to reevaluate the meaning of those places and their own relationship with the nation and the world.

    As history has shown around the world, one of the major downsides of leaders imposing name changes is that the names can be easily replaced as soon as the next regime takes power. The result can be a never-ending name game.

    The authors do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. From Greenland to Fort Bragg, America is caught in a name game where place names become political tools – https://theconversation.com/from-greenland-to-fort-bragg-america-is-caught-in-a-name-game-where-place-names-become-political-tools-251201

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: Secretary-General’s remarks to the Virtual High-Level Segment of the 16th Petersberg Climate Dialogue [as delivered]

    Source: United Nations secretary general

    Thank you for this opportunity — and for your focus today on collective climate action and acceleration of implementation. 

    This could not be more timely. 

    There is much uncertainty and instability in our world.

    But today we meet in the wake of some good news.

    Just this morning, the International Renewable Energy Agency officially confirmed that 2024 was a record year for renewables additions to global power capacity. 

    Renewables represented more than 92 per cent of all new electricity generation capacity installed last year.
     
    The amount of renewables added represents more than the total electricity capacity of Brazil and Japan combined.

    Europe’s capacity grew by 9 per cent – with Germany contributing more than one-quarter of that growth. Africa’s capacity grew by almost 7 per cent.

    All of this is another reminder of a 21st century truth:

    Renewables are renewing economies. 

    They are powering growth, creating jobs, lowering energy bills, and cleaning our air. 
     
    And every day, they become an even smarter investment. 

    Since 2010, the average cost of wind power has plunged 60%.  Solar is 90% cheaper. 

    In 2023, clean energy sectors accounted for five per cent of economic growth in India and six in the US. It accounted for a fifth of China’s GDP growth, and a third of the EU’s.

    The economic case for – and opportunities of – climate action have become ever clearer – particularly for those who choose to lead. 

    And leadership is what we need – as today’s IRENA report shows:

    To accelerate the shift to renewables…

    And to correct the imbalances in the transition, which is still starving developing countries – outside China – of the investment needed to fully embrace clean energy. 

    Excellencies, dear friends,

    As the title of this session puts it so well: we are indeed at a turning point to the future.

    In the ten years since Paris, we have seen other important progress.

    Ninety percent of global emissions are now covered by net-zero targets. 

    A decade ago, the planet was on course for a global temperature rise of over four degrees Celsius.

    Today, countries’ national climate plans – or NDCs – if fully delivered – will take us closer to a 2.6-degree rise.

    At the same time, climate challenges are piling up.  

    It seems records are shattered at every turn — the hottest day of the hottest month of the hottest year of the hottest decade ever. 

    All of this is hitting the vulnerable hardest, and everyday people in their pockets – with higher living costs, higher insurance premiums, and higher food prices.

    Just last week, the World Meteorological Organization confirmed that 2024 was another alarming year:

    Almost every climate indicator reached new and increasingly dangerous heights – inflaming displacement and food insecurity and inflicting huge economic losses.

    And, for the first time, the annual global temperature was 1.5 degrees Celsius hotter than pre-industrial times.

    Scientists are clear – it is still possible to meet the long-term 1.5 degree limit.

    But it requires urgent action. And it requires leadership.

    Excellencies, dear friends,

    I see two critical fronts to drive action. 

    First, new national climate plans – or NDCs – due by September.

    Investors need certainty and predictability.

    These new plans are a unique opportunity to deliver – and lay out a coherent vision for a just green transition.

    They must align with the 1.5-degree limit, as agreed at COP28. And cover all emissions and the whole economy.

    Together, they must reduce global emissions 60% by 2035 – compared to 2019…

    And contribute to the COP28 global energy transition goals.

    All this must be achieved in line with the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities, in the light of national circumstances but everybody, everybody must do more.

    The G20 – the largest emitters and economies – must lead.

    Every country must step up and play their part.

    The United Nations is with you all.

    President Lula and I are working to secure the highest ambition from the largest economies.

    The United Nations Climate Promise is supporting a hundred countries to prepare their new climate plans.

    And we will convene a special event in September to take stock of the plans of all countries, push for action to keep 1.5 within reach, and deliver climate justice.

    Second, we must drive finance to developing countries.

    The COP29 finance agreement must be implemented in full.

    I count on the leadership of the COP29 and COP30 Presidencies to deliver a credible roadmap to mobilize $1.3 trillion a year by 2035.

    We need new and innovative sources of financing, and credible carbon pricing.

    Developed countries must honour their promise to double adaptation finance to at least $40 billion a year, by this year.

    And we need serious contributions to the fund for responding to Loss and Damage, and to get it up and running.
    Excellencies,

    We can only meet these goals with stronger collaboration – between governments, and across society and sectors.

    Those that will lag behind need to be not a reason for us to be discouraged but an increase in our commitment to move forward.

    The rewards are there for the taking, for all those ready and willing to lead the world through these troubled times.

    We are at a turning point.  I urge you to seize this moment; and seize the prize.

    Thank you.
     

    MIL OSI United Nations News

  • MIL-OSI USA: U.S. biodiesel use increases outside of the transportation sector

    Source: US Energy Information Administration

    In-brief analysis

    March 26, 2025


    A small but increasing amount of biodiesel in the United States is consumed in the residential, commercial, and electric power sectors, according to new estimates now published in our State Energy Data System. Previously, we allocated all U.S. biodiesel consumption to the transportation sector, where the vast majority of biodiesel is consumed.

    Biodiesel is a renewable fuel produced using fats, oils, or greases usually blended with petroleum diesel and consumed by trucks. In 2023, the most recent year for which we have estimates, the transportation sector accounted for about 95% of the nearly 46 million barrels of biodiesel consumed in the United States.

    Biodiesel can also be blended with heating oil to heat homes and businesses. We estimate that the residential and commercial sectors combined accounted for nearly 5% of U.S. total biodiesel consumption in 2023, up from about 1% a decade earlier. The introduction of biofuel blending mandates for heating oil in some northeastern states is contributing to that growth. Although customers in other states likely blend biodiesel to heat homes and businesses, we only estimate consumption for New York, Connecticut, and Rhode Island.


    Consumption of biodiesel in the residential and commercial sectors is higher in New York than in any other state, accounting for 57% of the U.S. total for those sectors in 2023. New York City passed the nation’s first law requiring biodiesel blending with heating oil, mandating a minimum 2% biodiesel blended with heating oil beginning in 2012. Later, New York enacted a 5% minimum state-wide blend law beginning in 2022, which increases to 10% in 2025 and 20% in 2030. According to the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey, nearly 16% of homes in New York used heating oil as their primary heat source in 2023, about four times more than the U.S. average of about 4%.

    Connecticut and Rhode Island also have similar state-wide minimum biofuel blend laws for heating oil. Connecticut’s 5% blend law began in 2022 and ramps up to 10% in 2025, 15% in 2030, 20% in 2034, and 50% in 2035. Rhode Island was the first state to enact a minimum biofuel heating oil blend law that began with a 5% blend in 2017 and increased to 10% in 2023. Rhode Island’s blend law increases more quickly than the other states—up to 20% in 2025 and 50% in 2030. More than 34% of homes in Connecticut and 26% of homes in Rhode Island reported heating oil as their primary heat source in 2023.

    Biodiesel can also be burned to generate electricity, and the electric power sector accounted for less than 1% of U.S. biodiesel use in 2023. In 2006, a test plant in Tennessee reported the first biodiesel use for electric power in the United States. Hawaii has accounted for nearly all U.S. biodiesel consumed for electric power since 2009. In 2023, petroleum fueled about 68% of Hawaii’s total electricity generation, the highest share of any state, and we estimate that biodiesel fueled about 1% of the state’s total generation.


    Principal contributor: Mickey Francis

    Tags: biofuels, distillate fuel, heating oil, transportation, residential, commercial, electric generation, states, Connecticut, Hawaii, New York, Rhode Island, Tennessee, electricity, generation

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Financial News: Interview with Ekaterina Abasheeva for RBC Investments

    Translartion. Region: Russians Fedetion –

    Source: Central Bank of Russia –

    Rating agencies will assign stars to shares of Russian companies.

    RBC Investments discussed with Ekaterina Abasheeva, head of the Central Bank’s corporate relations department, topics that are of greatest interest to private investors: stock ratings and disclosure of information during an IPO.

    Over the past year, the Bank of Russia has launched several large-scale reforms aimed at increasing the transparency of the Russian market.

    Stock Ratings: Russian Analogue of Morningstar

    There are currently two major problems: a lack of quality analytics on companies, as well as the unavailability of information on a number of issuers. In these conditions, a discussion arose about creating stock ratings – a product that, on the one hand, would allow us to tell more about the issuer, and on the other, to identify a range of attractive stocks, noted Abasheeva.

    “In the summer of 2025, we plan to launch a pilot project of non-credit ratings of shares of Russian issuers, which is expected to reach full capacity in 2026. The idea is that rating agencies will act as a kind of provider of independent assessments of the fair value of the issuer. It will be determined on the basis of both financial and non-financial metrics. Ideally, over time, the market price should converge with the expert assessment. The rating of shares will be the Russian analogue of the Morningstar project, which has been offering a similar rating product in North America, Europe and Asia for over 30 years. Agencies will assign stars to shares and accompany the ratings with advanced analytics. Thus, investors will receive a transparent and professional guideline on the basis of which they will be able to make investment decisions,” the head of the department explains the idea.

    Who will be giving grades?

    At the stage of developing the idea of stock ratings, the Bank of Russia considered various options for who would evaluate issuers. “There was an idea to create a new participant in the market that would provide an analytical service. However, it seemed more expensive to us, since it requires the development of new regulations,” says Abasheeva.

    An alternative approach is to use the ready-made infrastructure of rating agencies, since they already have experience in the securities market and have proven themselves as independent experts who have earned the trust of issuers and investors. The head of the department notes that the Central Bank held a series of meetings with agencies, where they discussed all the pros and cons: why they can offer a new product.

    “We were worried about the discrepancy between the expert assessment and the actual value of the rated entity. And of course, disputes arose over what responsibility the agencies would bear,” she continues. “It seems that the combination of independence, competence and responsibility of the agencies is best suited for the assessment of equity instruments. Now that all the discussions are behind us, the rating agencies have begun to develop methodologies for a new category of ratings. We intend to pilot the project on their basis.”

    It is planned that one issuer will be able to receive several ratings from different rating agencies: “Stocks are a very volatile and poorly predictable instrument. Obviously, the dispersion of opinions here, it seems to me, is more important than in relation to bonds, where the ratings are more homogeneous. Therefore, of course, we ideally expected that there would be at least two opinions on stocks from different rating agencies.”

    If the agencies’ assessments differ dramatically and send conflicting signals to investors, this could prompt the Central Bank to consider minimum requirements for analysts – their methodologies and the information they use, she adds. However, this will become clear after preliminary testing of the ratings on the initial pool of issuers. Key parameters for assessing companies

    According to Ekaterina Abasheeva, at least two rating agencies have already developed and presented their methodologies to issuers and professional analysts. They are based on the model fair value of the issuer, she notes, but other factors that distinguish shares from debt instruments are also taken into account.

    This primarily concerns non-financial factors. This is the quality of corporate management, as well as the protection of investors’ interests. In addition, rating agencies will be required to pay attention to the issuer’s information sensitive to foreign sanctions, says the department director.

    The final set of parameters may include more factors, since the regulator does not plan to set strict requirements for methodologies at the pilot stage of the project, adds Abasheeva. “The criteria for the quality of corporate governance can take into account possible violations of the law by the issuer and complaints from shareholders,” she gives examples. Shares will have stars

    In the matter of how to display ratings, the Bank of Russia, together with rating agencies, did not reinvent the wheel and followed the path of the existing rating system. Star ratings are widely used to evaluate not only financial products, but also restaurants, hotels and films, notes Ekaterina Abasheeva. At the same time, the disclosure of the symbolic assessment will be accompanied by the publication of a full investment report, as well as a press release as its shortened version, she adds.

    “The combination of the rating and the report, on the one hand, will allow the investor to quickly navigate the information about the issuer. On the other hand, having analytical support, it is possible to better understand what caused the assignment of a particular rating,” explains the head of the department.

    The Central Bank plans to update the stock rating more frequently than bonds, since stocks are more volatile. However, the regulator believes that the main thing here is not to overdo it, and proposes to tie the publication of updated ratings to the release of IFRS reporting – this is approximately once every six months.

    When will the first stock ratings appear?

    Considering that the working version of the rating agencies’ methodologies has already been prepared, the launch of ratings in pilot mode with the participation of the first issuers is expected in the summer, Abasheeva shares her plans. “We expect the first test assessments based on the methodologies prepared by the agencies to appear in 2025, and in 2026 we plan to analyze the experience gained and understand how we can move forward with the development of the new product,” she predicts. Will ratings be mandatory for companies?

    Abasheeva says that issuers have responded positively to the idea of stock ratings, and some of them have expressed a desire to participate in the pilot project.

    The department director emphasized that the Central Bank assumes that in the near future the presence of a stock rating will become mandatory for a certain type of company. This primarily concerns issuers that do not disclose information due to sanctions risks. “We consider them as potential subjects of regulation. It is important that the rating indirectly tells about the company what it cannot tell about itself due to sanctions problems. But this will definitely not happen at the start, but when we understand that the product has become operational,” she explained.

    A small group of companies will participate in the pilot in 2025. By the end of the year, rating agencies have agreed to test stock ratings free of charge, says Abasheeva.

    According to the regulator, the issuers that demonstrate the best practices in information disclosure and corporate governance will be primarily interested in the stock ratings. For them, the Bank of Russia, together with the Moscow Exchange, has launched a program to increase shareholder value. “Participation in the program will allow investors and shareholders to form an idea of the issuer’s current business, expectations for the stock price and dividend payments. The rating will serve as expert confirmation of the investment attractiveness of the companies,” she explains.

    Transparency of issuers during IPOs

    The second important reform initiated by the Bank of Russia is aimed at increasing the transparency of the IPO procedure. At the end of January 2025, the regulator presented a report for public consultations “Information Transparency in the Securities Market: Issuers and Conditions for the Initial Public Offering of Their Shares”. The document included proposals to improve the information quality of placements, change the content of information disclosed by issuers and adapt it to the needs of retail investors.

    Over the course of a month, the regulator met with market participants to collect feedback and discuss proposals. According to Ekaterina Abasheeva, the most sensitive and controversial proposals were the proposals to include forecast indicators in the issue prospectus, the presence of two reports from independent analysts when a company goes public, and the definition of the role and responsibility of placement organizers. In the rest of the proposals in the advisory report, the Central Bank received support from investors, issuers, and placement organizers, she added.

    Forecast indicators

    The Bank of Russia believes that if a company publicly broadcasts forecasted performance indicators in its IPO marketing materials, they must correspond to what is disclosed in the securities prospectus, notes Abasheeva. According to her, companies can now describe the “best prospects” for their development in advertising materials. The investor has no choice but to focus on them, since there are simply no others. “We want to change the situation. It is important that the forecast indicators disclosed by issuers reflect reality – you can’t highlight only the good and hide under the carpet what is not in the issuer’s favor,” explained Ekaterina Abasheeva.

    The minimum set of forecast data in the prospectus may include revenue, net profit or loss, net profit per share, and return on equity. Issuers may provide all figures in the range mode, the width of which may be set by the regulator, Abasheva added.

    In addition to the range, the forecast horizon is important. The Central Bank knows of cases where the issuer in advertising brochures indicated potential growth of 40%, 100% – but it is unclear on what time horizon. Therefore, the Bank of Russia proposes to make the forecast horizon mandatory for at least one year, but issuers can choose a longer period.

    At the same time, responsibility for forecasts does not go away, Abasheeva emphasizes. “If you include deliberately false information in the prospectus, intentionally mislead investors, then you must be aware of your responsibility for this,” she explained. Analytical reports from professionals

    According to Ekaterina Abasheeva, this point caused some concerns among market participants. The main argument against independent assessment was that there are not enough analysts on the market now who can cover the IPO market, she says. However, from the regulator’s point of view, it is a question of chicken and egg: if there is demand for analytical reports, there will be analysts.

    Market participants also see a possible conflict of interest among analysts, when issuers will choose those who are guaranteed to “draw” them beautiful reports. To this, Abasheeva responded that the Bank of Russia has well-established mechanisms for working with the known problem: “A conflict of interest is a topic that is clear how to work with, because otherwise we would not have audit services or ratings for the same bonds. We do not see any problems here,” she notes.

    According to her, independence can be defined as the absence of other commercial interests of the person providing analytical services. Currently, the organizers of placements simultaneously evaluate the issuer and offer its shares to their clients when providing brokerage services, and acquire them for their portfolio.

    Allocation disclosure requirement may become mandatory

    In May 2024, the Central Bank tried to “spur” issuers and placement organizers to be open by sending an information letter. In the document, the regulator proposed that companies disclose their approaches to distributing shares among different categories of investors before the IPO, and then publish information on the actual distribution of shares among buyers.

    However, the information letter was advisory in nature and not all issuers heeded it. Currently, the Bank of Russia is considering the possibility of transferring the recommendations to the mandatory level, noted Abasheeva.

    “We are now proposing to make it mandatory to disclose information about both the proposed allocation and the actual distribution of shares,” said Abasheeva.

    It is planned that the Bank of Russia will present the results of the discussion of the report in the summer of this year and will determine the standards that will become mandatory for IPO candidates.

    Gleb Kukharchuk, Dmitry Polyansky, “RBC Investments”

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    Please Note; This Information is Raw Content Directly from the Information Source. It is access to What the Source Is Stating and Does Not Reflect

    HTTPS: //VVV.KBR.ru/Press/Event/? ID = 23488

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI USA: An Interview with Foreign Law Intern at the Law Library of Congress, Yu-Chen Tsai

    Source: US Global Legal Monitor

    Today’s interview is with Yu-Chen Tsai, a foreign law intern working with Foreign Law Specialist Laney Zhang in the Global Legal Research Center of the Law Library of Congress.

    Describe your background.

    I was born and raised in Tainan, a city in southern Taiwan known for its rich history and delicious street food. With my father being from the Philippines, I grew up in a multicultural environment.

    What is your academic/ professional history?

    I started my legal career in a rather unconventional way. My first formal employment was as an Institutional Review Board (“IRB”) coordinator at a hospital, where I was responsible for formulating a new human subject protection plan for all research involving human participants conducted at the institution. After leaving my position as an IRB coordinator, I continued to serve as an IRB member.

    Seeking broader legal experience from different perspectives, I worked as an in-house counsel in two distinct industries—human resources and manufacturing. In these roles, I conducted contract analyses, assessed the pros and cons of various agreements, and provided senior management with legal advice to support their decision-making processes.

    I hold a bachelor’s degree in law from Soochow University. Following that, I pursued a master’s degree at the College of Law at National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, where my dissertation focused on the importance of information disclosure regarding adverse drug events during litigation. I recently completed a Master of Laws (LL.M.) program at Columbia Law School in New York and passed the New York bar in 2024.

    How would you describe your job to other people?

    As a foreign law intern at the Global Legal Research Center of the Law Library of Congress, I conduct in-depth legal research and draft memoranda on the legal jurisdictions of China, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, and Singapore in response to Congressional and public inquiries. Additionally, I assist in drafting articles on Taiwan’s legal developments for the Global Legal Monitor.

    Why did you want to work at the Law Library of Congress?

    About 10 years ago, I had the opportunity to visit the Law Library of Congress with my current supervisor, Laney Zhang, as my guide. I told myself then that I would return one day. And here I am. It is truly a blessing to have the opportunity to work and learn alongside so many talented legal experts from different countries and to contribute by sharing legal developments from Taiwan.

    What is the most interesting fact you have learned about the Law Library of Congress?

    I was amazed to learn that there are tunnels beneath the Library of Congress that connect its three buildings, as well as some congressional buildings. I always get lost in this underground maze.

    What’s something most of your co-workers do not know about you?

    I love birds and have nine parrots back home. I also have a passion for flower arrangements and previously ran a small online store in Taiwan.


    Subscribe to In Custodia Legis – it’s free! – to receive interesting posts drawn from the Law Library of Congress’s vast collections and our staff’s expertise in U.S., foreign, and international law.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI: Zero Hash Secures Approval to Establish a Trust Company, Strengthening Its Custody Capabilities

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    ASHEVILLE, N.C., March 26, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Zero Hash, the leading crypto and stablecoin infrastructure platform, has been granted approval to establish a Trust Company in North Carolina, further reinforcing its position as the most comprehensive digital asset provider. This milestone deepens Zero Hash’s regulatory stack, unlocking new opportunities for institutional and brokerage clients.

    With the addition of a chartered Trust Company, Zero Hash expands its regulatory footprint, ensuring the broadest regulatory coverage for crypto and stablecoin infrastructure. Specifically, the Trust:

    • Aligns with the company’s commitment to compliance-forward innovation as the industry prepares for upcoming legislation, including the GENIUS Act, which are expected to add specific regulatory requirements for stablecoin custodians.
    • Enables Zero Hash to enhance its service offerings. As a Qualified Custodian, the company can now custody tokenized assets on behalf of SEC-registered institutions, further broadening its appeal to enterprise clients.
    • Allows Zero Hash to introduce new account types for brokerage customers, including retirement accounts and registered investment advisors.

    “This approval is a testament to our unwavering commitment to being the most comprehensive and trusted partner in the crypto and stablecoin space,” said Stephen Gardner, CEO of Zero Hash Trust. “We are excited to continue to expand our offering for the partners we service including the leading payment groups such as Shift4 and Stripe and brokerage partners including Interactive Brokers and tastytrade.”

    Concurrently, Zero Hash is announcing the appointment of two public board members appointed to the Trust. Mary Ruppert has over 20 years of experience as an attorney, compliance officer, and public policy professional, including at PayPal and the Department of Justice. David Hannigan is currently the CISO at NuBank, having previously led security at Spotify and Capital One.

    About Zero Hash

    Zero Hash is the leading crypto and stablecoin infrastructure provider that seamlessly connects fiat, crypto, and stablecoins in one platform, enabling a better way to move and transfer money and value globally.

    Through its embeddable infrastructure, start-ups, enterprises, and Fortune 500 companies build a diverse range of use cases, including cross-border payments, commerce, trading, remittance, payroll, tokenization, wallets, and on/off-ramps.

    Zero Hash Holdings is backed by investors, including Point72 Ventures, Bain Capital Ventures, and NYCA.

    Zero Hash Trust Company LLC will be established in North Carolina and hold a non-depository trust charter issued by the North Carolina Commissioner of Banks.

    Zero Hash LLC is a FinCen-registered Money Service Business and a regulated Money Transmitter that can operate in 51 U.S. jurisdictions. Zero Hash LLC and Zero Hash Liquidity Services LLC are licensed to engage in virtual currency business activity by the New York State Department of Financial Services. In Canada, Zero Hash LLC is registered as a Money Service Business with FINTRAC.

    Zero Hash Australia Pty Ltd. is registered with AUSTRAC as a Digital Currency Exchange Provider, with DCE registered provider number DCE100804170-001. Zero Hash Australia Pty Ltd. is registered on the New Zealand register of financial service providers, with Financial Service Provider (FSP) number FSP1004503. Zero Hash Europe B.V. is registered as a Virtual Asset Services Provider (VASP) by the Dutch Central Bank (Relation number: R193684). Zero Hash Europe Sp. Zoo is registered as a VASP by the Tax Administration Chamber of Poland in Katowice (Registration number RDWW – 1212).

    Media Contacts

    Zero Hash

    Shaun O’Keeffe

    (855) 744-7333

    media@zerohash.com

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Economics: Meet your AI Beauty Counselor: K-beauty giant Amorepacific builds an AI app for personalized advice

    Source: Microsoft

    Headline: Meet your AI Beauty Counselor: K-beauty giant Amorepacific builds an AI app for personalized advice

    Traditionally, salespeople at department stores or door-to-door have fulfilled that role. But these experts are scarce online. While beauty influencers abound, they usually promote specific products rather than what consumers want or need. 

    “We want to provide the same level of service that [customers] get offline in the online environment,” Hong said.  

    Hyper-personalization 

    Amorepacific was started 80 years ago by Suh Sungwhan, whose mother, Yun Dokjeong, bottled camellia oil by hand. It was the first Korean company to set up a cosmetics lab in the 1950s and to open a beauty counseling center in the 1960s. Today it is helmed by Suh’s son, Kyungbae Suh, and its well-known brands include Etude, Innisfree and Hera at the entry level, Laneige a step up and Sulwhasoo at the luxury end. 

    Amorepacific products are sold in more than 15 markets, the biggest being Korea, China and the rest of Asia Pacific. It is also making inroads in North America and Europe.  

    The organization was already using AI technology on its online Amore Mall to drive product search, recommendations and skin diagnosis when generative AI burst onto the scene about three years ago.  

    “We saw how we could make it [the online experience] a conversational service,” said Chikook Noh, Amorepacific’s AI Solutions Team Leader.

    Chikook Noh, Amorepacific’s AI Solution Team Leader, sees the app advising first on skincare then on make-up in future. Photo by Seong Joon Cho for Microsoft.

    The AIBC uses OpenAI’s GPT 4o and 4o-mini large language models on Microsoft Azure OpenAI Service to answer customer queries in the app. The underlying data is handled with Data Factory on Microsoft Fabric and AI Search functions in Azure AI Foundry. 

    The AIBC would help overcome a gap with the company’s existing online skin diagnosis tool on Amore Mall, Noh said. Currently consumers answer a series of questions such as “Is your skin oily? (Rate on a scale of 1 to 5)” and take a picture of their faces. It produces an overall score and dispenses advice on skincare and products. 

    This skin diagnosis tool has been used 2.5 million times online and in stores by consumers over the last four years. The IT department noticed an interesting thing – when used online via Amore Mall, “the transition to purchase tends to be on the lower side,” Noh said. But when used in a physical store, “the offline rate is very high because there is a conversation with the sales assistant.” 

    Sion Kim tries out the AI Beauty Counsellor app, which is being launched soon. Photo by Seong Joon Cho for Microsoft.

    The AI app aims to provide the kind of advice that store sales assistants provide to drive sales. Inputs for the AIBC will include consumers’ purchase history, review history as well as online skin diagnosis. The AIBC will then converse with the consumer to determine their current skin status and what their concerns are. 

    The most important thing is the “hyper-personalization. I know you. I know what troubles you have. I know what makes you feel good,” Noh said. 

    Different beauty needs 

    The AIBC development team anticipates interest even from those who don’t use a ton of beauty products. 

    Hyejin Yoon, 35, is at the other end of the consumer spectrum from Kim, the Pilates instructor. A former Chinese teacher for middle and high-schoolers, she now stays home with her one-year-old baby on the outskirts of Seoul. 

    Before the baby, she used various Amorepacific brands like Hera, Primera and Hanyul. Now there’s only time for a face wash, a toner and moisturizing cream from Illiyoon, a fragrance-free brand aimed at people with sensitive skin. She shares the cream with her baby. 

    “I have no time to put on so many steps because of the baby,” she said. 

    Hyejin Yoon is a time-pressed new mother in Seoul who says she would use the AI Beauty Counsellor app to suggest products for her skin. Photo by Seong Joon Cho for Microsoft.

    She noticed how her skin changed when she became a mother. “I feel my skin is getting drier and drier,” she said. “I am tired of having to keep trying different products.” 

    She briefly tried a test version of the AIBC app and said she could see herself using it, especially if it includes facial analysis. 

    The AI Beauty Counselor is Amorepacific’s first public-facing use of generative AI. 

    It follows the organization’s roll out in 2023 of a generative AI chat tool for internal use, also on Microsoft Azure OpenAI Service. That has been used for everything from summarizing medical research articles to creating interior designs for pop-up stores to creating marketing content. 

    Since the AIBC involves interacting with the public, the IT team has also taken pains to anticipate potentially risky subjects such as politics and religion. If a consumer touches on these subjects, the AIBC will reply: “This is a question we cannot answer,” according to Hong. 

    In the future, the goal is for the AIBC to go beyond text to include voice and images and dispense advice not just on skincare but also make-up and health supplements.

    Top Image: Sion Kim, a 26-year-old Pilates instructor, said she would use the AI Beauty Counsellor app to keep up with seasonal trends and what suits her skin type. Photo by Seong Joon Cho for Microsoft. 

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI Global: Forget booing the anthem, Canada must employ strategic communications to fight Trump’s lies

    Source: The Conversation – Canada – By Matthew Hefler, Senior Research Fellow, Center for Statecraft and Strategic Communication, Stockholm School of Economics

    Since his return to office, United States President Donald Trump has launched a trade war on Canada. The White House has twice set deadlines for the imposition of sweeping 25 pre cent tariffs — and twice pulled back.

    Trump has also threatened to use “economic force” to compel Canada to become the 51st state, remarks that are a focal point of the ongoing federal election campaign.

    Canadians are offended. They’ve voiced this displeasure, with Canadian sports fans continuing to boo the American anthem at recent events.

    This might be counterproductive.

    Trump says Canada is ‘nasty’

    In this trade war, Canada faces more than tariffs: it’s confronting a communications effort by the president to paint Canadians as mean, disrespectful and “nasty.”

    Trump’s most consistent line is that Canadians are “not fair,” “very abusive” and taking advantage of the U.S. on trade.

    Regardless of the truth, the president repeats these allegations over and over and over again.

    The repetition is the point — it’s an important practice in strategic communications or what’s known as StratCom, the use of communication to achieve objectives.

    The repetition is key to Trump’s StratCom — it’s a way of making his message stick. Hard as it is for Canadians to believe this, there’s a danger of this “nasty Canadian” narrative taking hold south of the border.

    Take it from a communications expert who often works in the U.S. and Europe: not everyone is as well-versed on the dispute as Canadians are. Even actions like booing the American anthem risk reinforcing Trump’s slurs against Canada.

    Canada must devise its own strategy to counter Trump’s message and remind Americans — and the world — that Canada trades on fair terms. By dampening American support for the president’s trade war, this StratCom effort could actually help protect the Canada-U.S. relationship for the long term.

    Creating false counter-narratives

    Trump has long mastered the art of swapping one narrative with a preferred alternative. This tactic has arguably helped save his political career.

    For millions of Americans, the president turned Russian interference in the 2016 election into the “Russia Hoax” — something he raised as recently as the infamous Oval Office meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.

    Rather than concede the 2020 election, Trump and his allies adopted the mantra “Stop the Steal.” And in a most striking StratCom effort, Trump and supporters recast the events of Jan. 6, 2021 at the U.S. Capitol into “a day of love.” Trump also issued a blanket pardon of all those convicted over the attack.

    These are astounding examples of strategic communications, whatever we might think of the president’s honesty or his objectives.

    Every time Trump repeats claims that Canada is taking advantage of the U.S., that narrative becomes further entrenched. So far, Ottawa has reminded Americans that Canada is a good partner and that tariffs would hurt both countries.

    But it’s not clear that appealing to the long Canadian-American history as allies is having much effect in the White House. In early February, Vice President JD Vance posted: “Spare me the sob story about how Canada is our ‘best friend’” and noted Canada’s low defence spending.

    A Canadian StratCom strategy

    The Canadian government therefore must invest in an ambitious campaign of strategic communications. It should drive home that Canadians trade on fair terms and that Canada buys more American goods than China, Japan, the United Kingdom and France combined.

    This StratCom effort must make clear that Canadians can and will be forced to buy elsewhere. It must note that Trump renegotiated a new Canada-U.S.-Mexico trade deal in 2018 and that the agreement was a win for the U.S.

    The campaign can employ humility and humour, but it must reinforce the mutual benefit of trade and make clear that Trump’s anti-Canada comments are not based in reality.

    Some specific claims must be targeted. Trump often notes that Canada has high tariffs on specific American products, like milk. But this can be misleading, as these are part of a negotiated supply control quota system.

    Rather than simply counter Trump’s narrative, the campaign should advance a Canadian one.

    Canadian leaders are starting to recognize this. Before leaving office, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau compared Trump’s treatment of Canada over trade with his conciliatory stance toward Russia over its invasion of Ukraine.

    Former finance minister Chrystia Freeland has underscored the importance of communicating directly to regular Americans. The federal government has paid for anti-tariff ads on digital billboards along key highways in red states, including Florida, Nevada, Georgia, Michigan and Ohio.

    Canadians themselves are in on the act. Decades after Canadian actor and broadcaster Jeff Douglas appeared in the iconic “I am Canadian” commercial, he’s come out with a new rendition.

    We are Canadian” rejects the president’s “51st State” threats. Its polite but firm tone is the sort of quintessentially Canadian response that should form the basis of a national StatCom effort.

    A new Jeff Douglas ‘We Are Canadian’ video.

    Controlling the narrative

    Given time and space, Trump can reshape the terms of the debate or even perceptions of reality. The Canadian government should therefore lead the way in defending the country’s trading practices and its value as a partner.

    This effort should reflect Canada’s traditional emphasis on respect and decency. Canadians are offended. But they should resist responses like booing another nation’s anthem — especially if it contributes to the president’s effort to paint Canadians as mean or disrespectful.

    The Canada-U.S. relationship will be changed by this experience. But whether the rift is lasting depends in part on whether Canadians believe regular Americans accept or reject the president’s narrative.

    A good communications effort could help Canada counter the president’s StratCom campaign and reduce the longer-term fallout from this unfair attack — no matter the repeated threats and slurs emanating from the Oval Office.

    Matthew Hefler does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Forget booing the anthem, Canada must employ strategic communications to fight Trump’s lies – https://theconversation.com/forget-booing-the-anthem-canada-must-employ-strategic-communications-to-fight-trumps-lies-252704

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI Banking: Participation of Standalone Primary Dealers in Variable Rate Repo operations

    Source: Reserve Bank of India

    In terms of the paragraph 1(x) of the Statement on Developmental and Regulatory Policies dated February 06, 2020, Standalone Primary Dealers (SPDs) were allowed to participate in all overnight liquidity management operations (except Marginal Standing Facility) under the current Liquidity Management Framework dated February 06, 2020. SPDs were also allowed to participate in other operations such as long-term Variable Rate Repo (VRR) operations and daily VRRs on a case-to-case basis.

    2. On a review, it has now been decided to allow SPDs to participate in all Repo operations, irrespective of the tenor, conducted by the Reserve Bank.

    (Puneet Pancholy)  
    Chief General Manager

    Press Release: 2024-2025/2470

    MIL OSI Global Banks

  • MIL-OSI Banking: Directions under Section 35A read with Section 56 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 – Shree Mahalaxmi Urban Co-operative Credit Bank Ltd., Gokak (Karnataka) – Extension of Period

    Source: Reserve Bank of India

    The Reserve Bank of India issued Directions under Section 35A read with Section 56 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 to Shree Mahalaxmi Urban Co-operative Credit Bank Ltd., Gokak vide Directive No. CO.DOS.SED.No.S4800/12-23-151/2024-2025 dated September 26, 2024, for a period of six months up to close of business on March 27, 2025. The Reserve Bank of India is satisfied that in the public interest, it is necessary to further extend the period of operation of the Directive beyond close of business on March 27, 2025.

    2. Accordingly, the Reserve Bank of India, in exercise of the powers vested in it under sub-section (1) of Section 35A read with Section 56 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, hereby extends the Directive for a further period of three months from close of business on March 27, 2025, to close of business on June 27, 2025, subject to review.

    3. All other terms and conditions of the Directive under reference shall remain unchanged.

    (Puneet Pancholy)  
    Chief General Manager

    Press Release: 2024-2025/2471

    MIL OSI Global Banks

  • MIL-OSI Economics: RBI imposes monetary penalty on Punjab & Sind Bank

    Source: Reserve Bank of India

    The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has, by an order dated March 24, 2025, imposed a monetary penalty of ₹68.20 lakh (Rupees Sixty Eight Lakh Twenty Thousand only) on Punjab & Sind Bank (the bank) for non-compliance with certain directions issued by RBI on ‘Creation of a Central Repository of Large Common Exposures – Across Banks’ read with ‘Central Repository of lnformation on Large Credits (CRlLC) – Revision in Reporting’ and ‘Financial Inclusion – Access to Banking Services – Basic Savings Bank Deposit Account (BSBDA)’. This penalty has been imposed in exercise of powers conferred on RBI under the provisions of Section 47A(1)(c) read with Sections 46(4)(i) and 51(1) of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949.

    The Statutory Inspection for Supervisory Evaluation (ISE 2023) of the bank was conducted by RBI with reference to its financial position as on March 31, 2023. Based on supervisory findings of non-compliance with RBI directions and related correspondence in that regard, a notice was issued to the bank advising it to show cause as to why penalty should not be imposed on it for its failure to comply with the said directions.

    After considering the bank’s reply to the notice, additional submissions made by it and oral submissions made during the personal hearing, RBI found that the following charges against the bank were sustained, warranting imposition of monetary penalty:

    1. The bank did not report certain borrowers with non-fund based exposure of ₹5 crore and above to CRILC; and

    2. The bank allowed certain BSBDA holders to open Savings Bank Deposit Accounts.

    The action is based on deficiencies in regulatory compliance and is not intended to pronounce upon the validity of any transaction or agreement entered into by the bank with its customers. Further, imposition of monetary penalty is without prejudice to any other action that may be initiated by RBI against the bank.

    (Puneet Pancholy)  
    Chief General Manager

    Press Release: 2024-2025/2469

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI Banking: Secretary-General of ASEAN welcomes Minister of Europe and Foreign Affairs of France to the ASEAN Headquarters/ASEAN Secretariat

    Source: ASEAN

    Secretary-General of ASEAN, Dr. Kao Kim Hourn, today welcomed H.E. Jean-Noël Barrot, Minister of Europe and Foreign Affairs of the Republic of France, at the ASEAN Headquarters/ASEAN Secretariat. Their discussion revolved around seeking ways and means to further enhance ASEAN-France relations as both sides mark the fifth anniversary of their Development Partnership this year.

    The post Secretary-General of ASEAN welcomes Minister of Europe and Foreign Affairs of France to the ASEAN Headquarters/ASEAN Secretariat appeared first on ASEAN Main Portal.

    MIL OSI Global Banks

  • MIL-OSI: BigCommerce Appoints Technology Veteran Andrew Norman to Lead EMEA Growth

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    AUSTIN, Texas and LONDON, March 26, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — BigCommerce (Nasdaq: BIGC), a leading provider of open, composable commerce solutions for B2C and B2B brands and retailers, today announced the company has hired SaaS and ecommerce veteran Andrew Norman as senior vice president and general manager for EMEA.

    Norman will lead BigCommerce’s go-to-market strategy in EMEA, bringing 25 years experience executing international expansion plans for SaaS technology companies, including 15 years experience in the ecommerce market.

    “BigCommerce has a strong track record of helping brands, retailers, manufacturers and distributors in EMEA grow, and Andrew is the perfect leader to help us accelerate that growth,” said Travis Hess, CEO at BigCommerce. “His years of experience make him well positioned to drive our strategic growth forward. Andrew brings an exceptional record of scaling international technology companies, as well as an extensive network of strategic partnerships that will be instrumental in boosting our market penetration and delivering innovative solutions to our customers.”

    Norman joins BigCommerce from Sendcloud (a Softbank Company), where he led the enterprise, UK and partners teams. He previously worked at Auctane (a Thoma Bravo Company), where he served in general manager roles for ShipStation in Canada, Europe and Australia and New Zealand, as well as general manager for Metapack.

    “I was drawn to BigCommerce by its extraordinary potential to lead the next wave of ecommerce innovation as the market converges around truly transformative platforms,” said Norman. “With its unique ability to enable seamless commerce across multiple channels, BigCommerce is perfectly positioned to empower brands, retailers, manufacturers, and distributors in an increasingly complex digital marketplace.”

    Learn more about BigCommerce here.

    About BigCommerce

    BigCommerce (Nasdaq: BIGC) is a leading open SaaS and composable ecommerce platform that empowers brands, retailers, manufacturers and distributors of all sizes to build, innovate and grow their businesses online. BigCommerce provides its customers sophisticated professional-grade functionality, customization and performance with simplicity and ease-of-use. Tens of thousands of B2C and B2B companies across 150 countries and numerous industries rely on BigCommerce, including Coldwater Creek, Harvey Nichols, King Arthur Baking Co., MKM Building Supplies, United Aqua Group and Uplift Desk. For more information, please visit www.bigcommerce.com or follow us on X and LinkedIn.

    BigCommerce® is a registered trademark of BigCommerce Pty. Ltd. Third-party trademarks and service marks are the property of their respective owners.

    Media Contact:
    Brad Hem
    pr@bigcommerce.com

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Economics: RBI imposes monetary penalty on KLM Axiva Finvest Limited

    Source: Reserve Bank of India

    The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has, by an order dated March 24, 2025, imposed a monetary penalty of ₹10 lakh (Rupees Ten Lakh only) on KLM Axiva Finvest Limited (the company) for non-compliance with requirements relating to ‘Declaration of dividends’ contained in the RBI directions on ‘Reserve Bank of India (Non-Banking Financial Company – Scale Based Regulation) Directions, 2023’. This penalty has been imposed in exercise of powers conferred on RBI under the provisions of clause (b) of sub-section (1) of Section 58G read with clause (aa) of sub-section (5) of Section 58B of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934.

    The correspondence pertaining to the intimation of declaration of an interim dividend revealed, inter alia, non-compliance with RBI directions. Based on the same, a notice was issued to the company advising it to show cause as to why penalty should not be imposed on it for its failure to comply with the said directions.

    After considering the company’s reply to the notice and oral submissions made during the personal hearing, RBI found that the following charge against the company was sustained, warranting imposition of monetary penalty.

    The company declared a dividend for the financial year 2023-24, despite not meeting the minimum prudential requirements in each of the last three financial years.

    This action is based on deficiencies in regulatory compliance and is not intended to pronounce upon the validity of any transaction or agreement entered into by the company with its customers. Further, imposition of this monetary penalty is without prejudice to any other action that may be initiated by RBI against the company.

    (Puneet Pancholy)  
    Chief General Manager

    Press Release: 2024-2025/2467

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Address to the National Press Club, Canberra

    Source: Australian Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister for Industry

    Here we are, back again on Ngunnawal land, gathering at the kind invitation of Maurice and the Board, sponsors and members of the National Press Club.

    But since last time, not just one new President but 2: Trump; and Connell.

    Congratulations Tom on your election, and thanks for your introduction –

    And to everyone here, including the pundits and, on recent form, maybe a couple of protesters again too.

    Last night marked the first time since Ben Chifley was PM and Treasurer, more than 3 quarters of a century ago, that there’ve been 4 budgets in a single term.

    And of the 11 times I’ve spoken here, I think it’s the 4 post‑Budget opportunities I’ve cherished the most.

    Partly because Laura Chalmers comes along, and is here again, she brought Leo last night, and that means a lot to me.

    And also, because they offer us the chance to go behind the Budget a bit, to provide some more of the colour and context.

    Today I want to talk about how our economy is turning a corner, even as global conditions take a turn for the worse.

    Explain how seismic changes in the world validate and vindicate our strategy, rather than undermine it.

    And lay out our government’s economic case for re‑election –

    Based on our progress to here, our plans from here, and the risks posed by our opponents.

    The fourth shock

    First let me sketch the backdrop.

    Twenty years ago, I fronted up for my first of 19 Budget lockups.

    Costello was Treasurer, and the global economy was a very different place.

    In the 2 decades since, half a dozen subsequent Treasurers presided over 3 big economic shocks.

    The first, a financial crisis that became a demand shock.

    The second, a pandemic that became a supply shock.

    The third, an inflationary shock that lingers around the world longer than anyone hoped.

    Escalating trade tensions now risk, if not represent, the fourth big economic shock in just 17 years.

    Now, if you think about the big post‑war global economic story.

    From Bretton Woods in 1945, to the high inflation of the 70s.

    The Washington Consensus that held from the end of the Cold War until the start of the GFC.

    There’s a tendency to talk about economic shocks as punctuation. A break in the flow.

    But the last 20 years prove that global shocks – in one form or another – are chapters in their own right.

    They no longer interrupt the story – they are the story.

    Acknowledgements

    Governing a country like ours in uncertain times like these is a responsibility we accept and an opportunity we cherish.

    Led by the Prime Minister – who is here today.

    His collaborative style of leadership is appreciated by all of us in his team.

    Katy and I told the Cabinet yesterday that we consider ourselves very fortunate to have been so well‑supported by so many ministers, a number of them here today and I thank and acknowledge them again.

    And no Treasurer has ever been more fortunate than me when it comes to the Finance Minister.

    The best colleague I’ve ever had.

    Nothing we’ve done over the course of 4 Budgets would be possible without her calm and composure, her empathy and judgement.

    Katy came to the Treasury thank you dinner on Thursday night.

    I’m told that’s unprecedented – but for us it’s not unusual.

    I’m sure Katy would agree it’s not the most glamorous ritual.

    The pile of pide boxes and a sea of tired eyes sums up the week, and weeks, before.

    But it gives us a chance to say thanks to Steven, Jenny, Glyn and all the officials involved in putting this Budget together.

    That evening, I was reflecting with officials on the time I spent as a public servant, working for Glyn in Queensland.

    He was the first to tell me what it looked like inside the Cabinet Room here in Parliament House.

    Right down to the framed paintings of Australian lorikeets on the walls.

    Those birds have seen and heard a lot!

    I’m told I’ve spent 664 hours in that room this term – which is about 27 days.

    Whenever I’m in there, I try to remember that’s it’s not the birds in the frame or the galahs in the pet shop that really matter.

    We try to ensure those conversations around the cabinet table are shaped by the conversations Australians are having around the kitchen table.

    We know cost of living is front of mind for most Australians and that’s why it’s been front and centre in all 4 budgets.

    No matter how difficult or long the deliberations might be in that room I’m always aware how lucky we are to be in there.

    Treasurers stand there on Budget night on behalf of all who do so much to put our plans into Budgets, and into action.

    ERC ministers who undertake the essential deliberations – 233 of those 664 cabinet room hours were with them.

    Every member of our caucus who all do so much to advocate for the people they represent.

    The staff from our offices and all the public servants.

    Please join me in thanking them.

    Turning a corner

    This Budget makes it clear that the Australian economy is emerging from a global cost‑of‑living crisis in better shape than anywhere else.

    Inflation is down, living standards are rising, real incomes are growing, unemployment is low, interest rates are coming down, debt is down and now growth is gathering pace.

    That combination is exceptional – and not accidental.

    It is the product of the choices we have made.

    Delivering cost‑of‑living relief for every Australian.

    Strengthening Medicare and the services people count on.

    And building a Future Made in Australia.

    The 2 weeks leading into the Budget made clear just how important and urgent this work has been.

    The human and economic costs of Tropical Cyclone Alfred.

    Coming so soon after widespread flooding in north and far north Queensland – with more damaging heavy rains there just last week.

    And now, fresh turmoil in the world – part of this fourth shock.

    All of this vindicates the course we chose 3 years ago.

    And validates the choices we made together.

    Economic case for re‑election

    This is where I want to pay tribute to the Prime Minister.

    The leader Australians see standing with emergency services in disasters brings the same decency to every challenge confronting our nation.

    Anthony’s leadership is defined by his compassion, his optimism – and his determination.

    And he will make our case for re‑election to the Australian people with those same qualities and commitment.

    This election will be about the strong foundations we have laid, the better future we are building – and the risk of our opponents wrecking it all.

    It will be a referendum on Medicare.

    A simple choice between Labor cutting taxes and helping with the cost of living –

    And Peter Dutton’s secret cuts which will make Australians worse off.

    Because he wants to cut everything except income taxes for workers.

    Above all else it will be an election about the economy.

    Labor’s economic case for a second term has 3 parts:

    The progress we have made together in the economy and repairing the budget.

    The work we are doing and the economic plan we are implementing – to boost wages, rebuild living standards, and make our economy more resilient, more competitive and more productive.

    And the deliberate threat and significant danger that the Coalition pose if they form the next government.

    Reason one: progress

    The economic progress documented in the Budget last night belongs to every Australian.

    It’s all the more remarkable against a backdrop of extreme global uncertainty.

    To give you a sense of that, take inflation.

    In the most recent quarterly data, inflation sits at 2.4 per cent – and just now, today’s monthly reading came in the same.

    On election night, in May of 2022, inflation was more than double that and rising.

    So when I stood here after our first Budget in October that year, inflation was nearly triple what it is today.

    In that first Budget, we were talking about how far we had to go together.

    Today, we can point to how far we’ve come.

    We have brought inflation down while encouraging a broader recovery in our economy, now well underway.

    Our fiscal policy helped break the back of inflation when it was at its peak.

    It adjusted to support growth and preserve employment, as inflation came down.

    And we’ve delivered responsible cost‑of‑living relief that has directly taken the pressure off prices.

    Because of this a soft landing is coming into view –

    With growth rebounding, living standards recovering, and the private sector playing a larger role.

    The last financial year saw the highest level of business investment in over a decade.

    Four in every 5 of the million jobs created have been in the private sector.

    25,000 new businesses created each month this term – the highest average on record.

    Real wages and living standards rising again.

    While the gender pay gap is at near record lows and unemployment is at around 4 per cent.

    Treasury expects employment growth this year will be stronger, inflation will come down faster, and participation will stay near its record high for longer compared with the mid‑year update.

    So, our economy isn’t just growing faster, it’s growing in a way which will be stronger, more sustainable and more inclusive too.

    All this, while successfully steering towards a stunning improvement in our fiscal position.

    We inherited a mess and we’re cleaning it up.

    The budget bottom line is $207 billion better off on our watch.

    This is the biggest ever nominal improvement in a single term.

    Turning $135 billion of Liberal deficits into surpluses worth $38 billion – the first back‑to‑back surpluses in 2 decades.

    Almost halving the deficit we inherited for this financial year.

    And improving the budget position every year of the forward estimates, compared to PEFO.

    All this is a deliberate result of our responsibility and restraint.

    Banking the vast majority of revenue upgrades – around 7 of every 10 dollars.

    Restraining spending growth to 1.7 per cent – less than half the average under our predecessors.

    Finding almost $95 billion of savings – more this term than they managed over their last 2 combined, with precisely zero in their last Budget.

    Making real structural reform to secure the future of aged care and the National Disability Insurance Scheme.

    Guaranteeing the choice, dignity and security they bring to millions of Australians.

    And tackling high and rising interest costs.

    Just after coming to government, they were forecast to grow by 14.4 per cent per year.

    After 3 years of responsibility and restraint we’ve managed to cut that to 9.5 per cent.

    A big part of this story is our decision to return the vast majority of revenue upgrades to the bottom line.

    Not only has this improved the budget position by around $250 billion dollars to 2028–29.

    It means we will save about $112 billion in interest payments over the medium term.

    Reason 2: plans

    We don’t see the substantial progress we’ve made on the budget as an end in itself.

    Repairing the budget and rebuilding living standards go hand in hand.

    Our responsible approach has made room for the 5 main priorities of this Budget.

    Helping with the cost of living.

    Strengthening Medicare.

    Building more homes.

    Investing in every stage of education.

    And making our economy stronger, more productive, and more resilient.

    These are essential components of our economic plan.

    To strengthen our resilience in uncertain times.

    To create a more dynamic, competitive economy.

    And to rebuild incomes and living standards.

    Rebuilding living standards

    In this Budget we’re delivering more cost‑of‑living relief for Australians when it’s needed.

    Extending energy bill relief.

    Funding wage increases for care workers.

    Making medicines cheaper.

    Relieving student debt.

    And lowering taxes for every taxpayer.

    The combined benefit for an average household will be more than $15,000 from our 3 rounds of tax cuts and energy bill relief alone.

    Substantial relief while also building the earning capacity of Australians for the future too.

    By improving access to education – so that every Australian gets the chance to work in the jobs of the future.

    By investing in Medicare and expanding bulk billing – minimising out of pocket health costs and time out of work.

    And by moving towards universal early childhood education – so that parents can work more, if they want to.

    These parts of our plan to rebuild living standards are distinct but interlinked.

    Take our tax cut top‑up – a modest but meaningful addition to the tax cuts we’re rolling out already.

    The average annual tax cut, after this year’s and next year’s, is $2,548 or about $50 a week.

    Our tax cuts will:

    Boost incomes by 1.9 per cent within 2 years.

    Support the private sector recovery.

    Increase participation by more than 1.3 million hours –

    With Treasury estimating that 900,000 of these hours will be taken up by women.

    And give people a better start in their careers with the average young worker receiving a tax cut more than twice the size they would have under the Coalition.

    So, our tax cuts provide immediate relief while also boosting participation, aspiration, and Australians’ long‑term earning potential too.

    Resilience

    This focus on improving living standards is a big part of this Budget because it’s the fundamental mission of our government.

    Creating opportunities, and helping people seize them in a world full of churn and change.

    We cannot undo or ignore the shift from globalisation to fragmentation.

    We can determine how we respond.

    That’s what a Future Made in Australia is about.

    It’s a pro‑trade agenda, that puts a premium on private sector investment.

    It rejects self‑sabotaging tariffs and trade barriers, protectionism and isolationism.

    It focuses on how we shore up critical supply chains and become indispensable to new ones.

    This is critical to the jobs of the future.

    And it’s vital to managing uncertainty now.

    $30 billion of projects in sectors like green hydrogen, critical minerals and clean energy manufacturing have been proposed or are in development.

    Our plan is to build on this progress – improving our resilience by unlocking our competitiveness.

    In this Budget we’re facilitating more private investment in renewable energy – our fundamental comparative advantage in the new net zero economy.

    We’re funding research in clean energy technology manufacturing and low carbon liquid fuels – so we can commercialise Australian innovations.

    And we’re making big investments in green metals – leveraging our traditional strength in resources to build new opportunities.

    Reform

    A Future Made in Australia, powered by cleaner and cheaper energy, positions us as an essential part of the global net zero economy.

    This will be critical to our growth prospects.

    But it’s not the only part of our growth agenda.

    We know the foundations of future success start with more competitiveness, and a more productive economy.

    That’s why we’re reforming the payments system, our financial market infrastructure, approvals processes, our foreign investment framework and more.

    It might be unusual to keep the wheels of economic reform turning in a pre‑election Budget, but that’s what we’re doing.

    First, by banning non‑compete clauses for most workers.

    And second, by creating a national licensing scheme for electrical occupations.

    We’re proud of these changes because they show that the way to increase competition and productivity in our economy isn’t with scorched‑earth industrial relations –

    Or making Australians work longer for less.

    It’s with policy that boosts competition, while boosting wages and our workforce at the same time.

    This is a Budget that’s pro‑worker, pro‑growth and pro‑competition.

    Our reform to non‑competes will remove a handbrake on competition and a speedbump to aspiration.

    Most workers will no longer need a lawyer to get a better paying job.

    They won’t need permission from their old boss to become their own boss.

    Instead, we’re empowering them to move jobs and earn more and start businesses if they want to.

    This could add an estimated $5 billion annually to our economy.

    At the same time as average wages for those freed from these restrictions could increase by up to $2,500 a year.

    We’re also boosting competition and backing workers with a new occupational licensing regime for electricians.

    Requiring electricians to get a new license every time they want to work inter‑state is unnecessary, costly red tape.

    We’re making sure a sparky on the Tweed doesn’t need a different licence for a job in Coolangatta.

    Broader licensing reform could lift GDP by up to $10 billion a year.

    Which is why this change will be a template for future reform.

    Reason 3: risk

    Our progress to here, and our plan for what’s ahead, make up 2 parts of our economic case for re‑election.

    The third is the risk that all this could be undone by a Coalition government.

    Usually at this point in Budget week or the electoral cycle, you would set some basic tests for your opponent.

    On this occasion they’ve already failed them.

    The Coalition has put forward the ‘weakest policy offering from an opposition in living memory’, according to industry sources.

    They either don’t have a clue or they won’t come clean.

    But what looks like slapstick comedy masks more sinister intent.

    We know this because Angus Taylor has told us, and the Coalition’s position on key issues has shown us.

    Now, Angus and I don’t agree on much.

    But to give credit where it’s due, he made one insightful point recently when he said ‘the best predictor of future performance is past performance’.

    And – in a dramatic break from usual Coalition internals – Peter Dutton backed him in.

    On this, they are absolutely right.

    Their past performance is no surpluses, more waste and rorts, and more debt.

    Their past performance is middle Australia missing out – with real wages in reverse and living standards falling fast.

    Their past performance is much higher and rising inflation.

    Their past performance is Peter Dutton’s attacks on Medicare.

    But it is not just their record in government that reveals their priorities and what they would do if elected.

    Their recent record in Opposition makes it very clear:

    Australians would be worse off under Peter Dutton.

    When he cuts, Australians will pay.

    Cutting cost‑of‑living help is the only motivation that binds this Coalition clown show together.

    They’ve opposed cuts to student debt and energy bill relief.

    Opposed cheaper childcare and cheaper medicines.

    Opposed more homes and more Urgent Care Clinics.

    Today they voted for higher taxes on Australian workers.

    Australians would be much worse off if Peter Dutton had his way and they’ll be worse off still if he wins.

    This brain snap from Angus Taylor on tax makes that crystal clear.

    It means this parliamentary term finishes like it started:

    Labor helping Australians with the cost of living and Peter Dutton and the Coalition trying to prevent it.

    The Liberals and Nationals have now opposed 3 tax cuts, 3 times in 3 years.

    Instead of working with us to help Australians, they’ve got secret plans to harm them.

    It beggars belief that Peter Dutton says he will make hundreds of billions in cuts, but won’t tell Australians where or how.

    There’s only one reason for that – and people should know about it.

    The Coalition can’t find the $600 billion they need for nuclear, or the billions in cuts they’ve promised, without coming after Medicare again.

    The point I’m making is this.

    When the Australian economy is turning a corner.

    And the global economy is taking a turn for the worse.

    We can’t afford to turn back.

    Not when so little is known about the alternative.

    Conclusion

    I know this tradition is as much about your questions as it is about the Treasurer’s address.

    So let me just share some final thoughts.

    There are familiar rituals and rhythms to Budget week.

    Even after 20 years, you can still get caught up in them.

    But a budget is never about one week, or 5.

    It’s overwhelmingly a program for the years ahead.

    Ours also makes the economic case for re‑election.

    More than that, it spells out our plan for action to build on the progress we’ve made together.

    Now, it’s probably fair to say that over the years and out in the suburbs there’s been a flattening of expectations of what we can achieve through economic policymaking.

    And a narrowing of our collective sense that political leadership can make a real and tangible difference in people’s lives.

    Every one of us has reason to reflect on our role, but also, on whether we can turn it around.

    Because Australians should be proud of all that we have achieved together.

    We are on the cusp of something extraordinary in our economy.

    But something prevents us from saying so.

    Maybe that’s because of Australians’ natural streak of humility.

    Maybe after years of crisis, we’ve trained ourselves to brace for the next one.

    Maybe it’s the erosion of trust in institutions that we see around the world.

    Something that Australia has so far managed to avoid the most extreme fallout from.

    But a big part of it is undoubtedly due to the pressure people are under.

    We get that.

    Because, while we have every reason to be optimistic about the future, we understand that this can often run ahead of
    how people are faring and feeling.

    For many Australians, the pressures of the past few years have been substantial.

    So let me say we don’t just acknowledge that – we’re doing something about it.

    You saw that again in the Budget last night.

    Yes, inflation is coming down, real wages are up, unemployment is low, interest rates have started coming down, the economy is bouncing back.

    But for many people, the gap between working hard and getting ahead still needs eliminating.

    That’s why there’s more work to do.

    It’s why our focus isn’t confined to the national numbers – as important as they are.

    This Budget is about more than turning the corner, it’s a plan for where we go next.

    Not just putting the worst behind us –

    But seizing what’s in front of us.

    In this new world of uncertainty –

    Creating a new generation of prosperity –

    That is stronger, because it is more inclusive –

    In the better future that we’re building together.

    Thanks very much.

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI Economics: What’s next for corporate net zero? Join GlobalData’s webinar to find out how to adapt your ESG strategy

    Source: GlobalData

    What’s next for corporate net zero? Join GlobalData’s webinar to find out how to adapt your ESG strategy

    Posted in Strategic Intelligence

    Decarbonization has become one of the most disruptive trends across all industries. Virtually every major company in every sector now has a strategy for reaching net-zero greenhouse gas emissions. This impacts their relationships with suppliers, clients, and customers and drives investment in new technologies, says GlobalData, a leading data and analytics company.

    Against this backdrop, the GlobalData Strategic Intelligence team invites you to attend its What next for corporate net zero? webinar on Thursday, 27 March 2025, at 4pm GMT/12pm EDT.

    During this webinar, Chris Papadopoullos, Principal Analyst, Strategic Intelligence at GlobalData, and Grace Fan, Managing Director, Global Policy Research and Disruptive Themes Research, TS Lombard, will take a deep dive into net zero to find out:

    • The impact of Trump 2.0 on corporate net zero strategies.
    • The biggest emissions challenges facing companies approaching 2030 targets.
    • The emerging strategies and technologies of corporate sustainability leaders.

    Papadopoullos says: “Despite an anti-ESG backlash in the US, major companies have broadly stuck to their environmental goals. However, companies must balance their communications to appease anti-ESG and pro-ESG stakeholders.

    “The main challenges corporates will need to overcome between now and 2030 to achieve emissions targets include trying to find enough renewable energy, decarbonizing artificial intelligence, reducing emissions from agriculture and land use, and finding high-quality carbon offset projects in which to invest.”

    Fan adds: “Although the shape of the green transition is changing as global geopolitics scrambles supply chains and the AI-energy-water nexus adds new stresses on national grids, decarbonization as a structural force is here to stay. This makes it imperative for companies to think beyond the next few years to future-proof their strategies.”

    Register now for GlobalData’s What next for corporate net zero?” webinar on Thursday 27 March 2025 at 4pm GMT/12pm EDT.

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI Australia: UPDATE: Additional charges – Child exploitation offences – Darwin

    Source: Northern Territory Police and Fire Services

    The Northern Territory Police Force has further charged a 72-year-old male in relation to child exploitation offences in Darwin.

    Since the 72-year-old was arrested in January, three more victims have come forward. All four victims, including the original victim, were known to the male.

    A total of 21 charges in relation to child abuse offences have been laid against the alleged offender.

    He has been further remanded to face Darwin Local Court 7 May 2025.

    Anyone affected by child abuse and exploitation or who has information that may assist police are urged to call Crime Stoppers on 1800 333 000 or https://crimestoppers.com.au/.

    An online report can also be made via the Australian Centre of Counter Child Exploitation via the ‘Report Abuse’ button at www.accce.gov.au/report.

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-Evening Report: Peter Dutton promises $6 billion 12-month halving of petrol and diesel excise

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra

    Opposition leader Peter Dutton will promise in his Thursday budget reply that a Coalition government would immediately halve the fuel excise on petrol and diesel.

    The cut, which would take the excise from 50.8 cents a litre to 25.4 cents, would be for a year, at a cost of A$6 billion.

    The opposition says the measure would mean a household with one vehicle filling up once a week would save about $14 weekly, on average. This would amount to about $700 to $750 over the year, based on a 55 litre tank.

    A two-car household would save about $28 a week on average – nearly $1500 over the year.

    Legislation for the excise cut would be introduced on the first parliamentary sitting day after the election so it could come into effect “as quickly as possible”.

    Dutton contrasted the immediate relief with the longer time frame before people received the tax cuts announced in the budget.

    Under the tax changes, taxpayers will receive a tax cut of up to $268 from July 1 next year and up to $536 every year from July 1 2027.

    The $17.1 billion income tax package was being rushed through the Senate on Wednesday night, as the parliament readies to rise for the election, that could be called as early as Friday for May 3.

    The government wanted to pass the legislation immediately to put the Coalition, which opposed the bill and voted against it in parliament, on the spot.

    Also, having the tax cuts in law gives greater certainty to them, as Labor promotes them in the coming campaign.

    Dutton said of his proposed excise cut: “If elected, we will deliver this cost of living relief immediately – whereas people have to wait 15 months for Labor’s 70 cent a day tax tweak.”

    “This cost of living relief will make a real difference to families and small businesses – everyone from tradies, to mums and dads, to older Australians, and to transport delivery workers,” he said.

    “The commute to work, taking the kids to school or sport, the family drive, or the trip to the shops will all cost less under the Coalition. Our plan will save many hundreds of dollars for families across Australia.

    “Lowering costs to small businesses, means lower costs for goods and services at the checkout.”

    The Morrison government introduced a six-month cut to fuel excise in 2022. The Albanese government declined to extend it when it expired.

    Michelle Grattan does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Peter Dutton promises $6 billion 12-month halving of petrol and diesel excise – https://theconversation.com/peter-dutton-promises-6-billion-12-month-halving-of-petrol-and-diesel-excise-250896

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI Russia: The Academic Council of the State University of Management discussed the development strategy and the future of education

    Translartion. Region: Russians Fedetion –

    Source: State University of Management – Official website of the State –

    On March 25, 2025, the next meeting of the Academic Council of the State University of Management was held.

    Traditionally, we started with the congratulatory part. Rector Vladimir Stroyev presented letters of gratitude from the Ministry of Science and Higher Education for their contribution to the development of practice-oriented education, the development of the federation within the framework of the “Service Learning” program to Vice-Rector Dmitry Bryukhanov and Associate Professor of the Department of Management in International Business and Tourism Industry Svetlana Grishaeva.

    Vladimir Vitalyevich also congratulated the birthday boys of the month and thanked Elena Shtyreva, an employee of the Institute of Distance Education of the State University of Management, for 55 years of continuous work at the State University of Management.

    “I also want to join in the congratulations and say “thank you” on behalf of all the institute’s employees for their daily work and contribution to the development of the institute. I know where she gets this character from, her grandfather was the deputy commander of Vasily Chapaev’s division,” Sergei Lenshin, director of the Fine Arts Department of the State University of Management, congratulated Elena Arkadyevna.

    After the completion of the formal part, those gathered moved on to considering the issues on the agenda.

    Deputy Director of the Department of Academic Policy and Implementation of Educational Programs Olga Zhuravleva presented a summary report on the self-assessment of the main areas of the university’s activities for 2024.

    “For the first time, we worked on the report together with the Center for Prospective Development, which allowed us to better present the overall picture. The indicators have mostly increased and are impressive. The University is successfully developing in most indicators. However, there are also growth points and challenges of modern society that we need to work with more actively,” Olga Zhuravleva noted.

    Director of the Center for Prospective Development Tatyana Gordeeva spoke about the results of the implementation of the State University of Management Development Program for 2024.

    “2024 has become a fundamental year in the formation of the organizational foundations of the development program. At the same time, today we are already working on its implementation in the context of the emerging new system of higher education. What it will be like is still unknown, but we must keep this in mind. In addition, there are risks of reducing off-budget admission to humanitarian programs, which are key for the State University of Management today. Therefore, today it is important to focus on the effective implementation of the development tasks that we have defined for ourselves in order to form the necessary reserve for participation in new national projects and the implementation of our ambitious goals,” Tatyana Gordeeva emphasized.

    Vladimir Stroev noted the importance of not only taking into account indicators in areas, but also making proposals for their improvement, which he expects from every employee.

    “The issue of the development program is not simple, it is connected with many indicators that are used in different systems and different issues. And all our reports must be treated responsibly, not only noting positive results, but also expressing criticism in case of their failure. These data are a reason to think about what we are doing now and what will happen to us tomorrow. It would be good not just to fulfill the indicators, but also to exceed them, or be close to this,” concluded Vladimir Vitalyevich.

    Director of the Institute of Economics and Finance Galina Sorokina reported on the results of the institute’s work for 2024.

    “The institute has shown growth in almost all areas, so it is especially pleasant to make a report. The number of not only admitted students has grown, but also those who transferred from other universities. The number of foreign students has also grown, with Vietnamese students predominating. The number of educational programs implemented by the institute is also growing. A program on behavioral economics is being developed, which will be carried out jointly with the Central Bank and Rosfinmonitoring,” Galina Petrovna noted.

    Vice-Rector Pavel Pavlovsky informed those gathered about the implementation of the Youth Policy Strategy at the State University of Management.

    “The State University of Management is undoubtedly one of the leading universities in the implementation of youth policy. We became the first university in Moscow for educational work, and in Russia we took 3rd place among universities with a population of 5 to 10 thousand people. In 2024, 47 federal projects were held on the basis of the State University of Management. This year, we initiated the All-Russian student competition “Family History. Immortal Memory”, expanded the geography of the All-Russian project “Course for Business and Entrepreneurship” that we are implementing, which will be held not only in the International Children’s Center “Artek” and the All-Russian Children’s Center “Ocean”, but also in the All-Russian Children’s Centers “Smena” and “Orlyonok”. And, of course, the All-Russian KVN School, “University Shifts” and other important events await us,” Pavel Vladimirovich shared.

    Vice-Rector Dmitry Bryukhanov proposed creating a Preparatory Department for Foreign Citizens, which was unanimously supported by the council members.

    At the end of the meeting, Vladimir Stroyev called on those gathered to prepare not only for the 2025 admissions campaign, but also to think about admissions in 2026 and make their proposals.

    “This year, the admission campaign is still under the old system, but next year a new model will be adopted, and we must be ready. It is time to prepare proposals for our areas in a given situation, including in the event of a stressful situation. We must have specific solutions for each issue,” the rector of the State University of Management concluded.

    In addition, the meeting discussed the nomination of GUU employees to participate in the All-Russian competition “Golden Names of Higher Education”, approval of new DPO programs, tuition fees and other work issues.

    Subscribe to the TG channel “Our GUU” Date of publication: 03/26/2025

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Interview – Triple J Hack with Dave Marchese

    Source: Murray Darling Basin Authority

    E&OE TRANSCRIPT

    PRESENTER DAVE MARCHESE: So, let’s get into this a bit more now with Anne Aly, the Youth Minister. Minister, thank you very much for joining us on Hack. The government hoping to pass its tax cuts for all Australians. The Opposition, calling them a cruel hoax, says Labor’s bribing voters. Are you bribing voters?

    MINISTER ANNE ALY: No, these are tax cuts. And I think that every Australian out there who knows the value of the dollar, particularly for young people, for whom cost of living is a particularly acute issue that’s impacting on them every day, knows exactly what it means to have an extra dollar or two or three or four in your pay packet. These are pretty significant tax cuts. They build on the tax cuts that we already gave. And everyone will remember that if it was up to the Coalition, people earning under $45,000 —which is a lot of young people —would have got absolutely zero, zilch, nothing, nada in terms of tax cuts, according to their plan for tax cuts. So, they voted against the tax cuts today. Shows exactly where their heads are at when it comes to giving a little bit of cost-of-living relief.

    MARCHESE: But is it fair everyone gets them? Like, do you think it’s fair that a nurse is going to be paying for a tax cut for someone like an MP, like a politician, you.

    ALY: Well, we all pay tax according to what we earn. One of the important things to note is bringing the lower tax bracket down to 14,000. And I think, you know, I think most Australians understand the more you earn, the more tax you pay. So, if you’re going to get a tax cut, of course it’s going to be a bigger tax cut.

    MARCHESE: But I guess people are asking, why not give more relief to those who need it, those who below the poverty line? Because there are some people out there saying, we don’t need this.

    ALY: Whether it’s like the largest, you know, increase in rent assistance, 45 per cent increase in rent assistance. Whether it’s increasing JobSeeker, Youth Allowance, ABSTUDY, Austudy. You know. The increases that we’ve made to the minimum wage, the increases that we’ve made in industrial relations to allow wages to increase. Whether it’s energy bill, rebates, medicines, cost of medicines, bringing the cost of medicines down, particularly also for young people, the HECS debt, saving them an average of $5,500. So, it’s not just the tax cuts in isolation. And I don’t think you could ever just give cost of living relief through one mechanism.

    MARCHESE: You mentioned HECS, which is obviously something a lot of our listeners are really keen to hear reform on. You’re promising to cut a further 20 per cent off all student loan debts, but only if you’re re-elected. Why do people have to wait for this? Why do students have to wait? Because the government’s had three years.

    ALY: I think it’s got to do with like setting everything up and everything like that. To be honest, you know, that’s more of a question for the Minister for Education around the timing of it as well…

    MARCHESE: It does affect young people though, and you’re the Youth Minister.

    ALY: It does, but the thing is. Yeah, yeah, you’re right there, Dave, I’ll give you that one. But look, I think the thing is that we’ve been doing a whole lot of reform across the whole education sector. Now when you get into government, there’s a whole lot of stuff that you have to do and you do them – you know, sometimes it’s incremental, sometimes you can do things straight away, sometimes you can’t do things straight away. I tell you what, if I had a magic wand or some kind of superpower, I would have loved to have done everything straight away.

    MARCHESE: But do you understand why some voters might think, well, it is a bribe. It’s only if I vote that I get this relief that I’ve needed not just this year but for years.

    ALY: I guess that is kind of reflective of also a more broader cynicism towards politics where every measure that we do is, you know, put into the basket of, oh, well that’s just a bribe or that’s just a bribe…

    MARCHESE: Or is it people just saying you’ve had three years and why can’t we see these changes in your term of government? Is it time to give someone else a go?

    ALY: Well, if they give someone else a go, that someone else is Peter Dutton. I can guarantee you he’s not going to give you any cuts off your HECS debt. I can guarantee you he’s not going to give you any cost-of-living relief. I can guarantee you he’s not going to fix the indexation or give you a fee-free TAFE. In fact, they voted against all of those things.

    MARCHESE: Alright, this is Hack. I’m Dave Marchese getting into the details of the budget with Youth Minister Anne Aly. Hearing from you on the text line. Someone says doing better than the coalition is not a flex. Someone else ‘This is so disappointing and disgusting, never ever voting Labor or Liberal again. And I know a lot of young people doing the same.’ Minister hearing loud and clear from the Hack audience, a lot of them asking about the long term because it is deficits as far as the eye can see. Young Australians are going to be the ones dealing with all this. Is there any plan for how we’re going to pay all of this off in the years ahead?

    ALY: Yeah, you know, I hear the term deficit and surplus. I’ll remind everyone that we did deliver two surpluses in a row and that there are a lot of global headwinds that contribute to the deficits and that the Treasurer has been very upfront in saying that we will be looking at deficits largely due to a lot of global kind of economic trends and activities. I’m not, you know, for the young people that I speak to, Dave, and I do speak to a lot of young people, not just in this portfolio. The starkest and most acute issue is what is impacting on their life currently and that is cost-of-living and that is being able to have the kind of life that they see that their parents had.

    MARCHESE: But that won’t be possible if there’s all this debt that has to be paid off later. Like Australia is spending $50 billion more per year than we’re collecting in tax. Shouldn’t we be seeing some sort of structural changes in the budget that will paint a picture of how this is all going to be dealt with in the future, how young Australians are going to deal with this.

    ALY: Well, the Treasurer has talked about how we’ve made some structural reform and structural repair of the budget too in terms of banking revenue back into the budget and continuing to bank revenue into the budget as well. What I think I would say is that, you know, in some senses deficit is, as the Treasurer said, unavoidable when there are global kind of economic headwinds at play that we have little control over. The role of a government, a responsible government, particularly at a time where there is high inflation and where people are facing real cost of living pressures, is to really ensure that we give that cost of living, ease those cost-of-living pressures without putting upward pressure on inflation. And we’ve managed to bring inflation down. I think one of the things that you’re talking about here is, you know, long term vision. I would say to you, and I would probably agree with the point that it’s when you have three year terms in government which actually effectively work out to about two and a half years of actually being able to work in your role as a Minister or as a representative in Parliament, it’s very difficult to instigate and put into place really long term reform.

    MARCHESE: But that is the system that we have, and we’ve had for a long time. And I mean, some of the concern here that we’re hearing from listeners. You’ve got someone on Hack’s Instagram now, Danny, that says, you know, ‘This isn’t a budget, it’s a slap in the face’, is that people think that they’ve been promised something that hasn’t been delivered. That when Anthony Albanese was pitching to be in government at the last election, he was saying nobody would be left behind. But the reality is now we’ve had the biggest fall in disposable income in the OECD over the past two years, that people are feeling worse off than they were a few years ago at that last election. How do you convince young Australians to vote for you with all of that in mind?

    ALY: Oh, we’re not sugarcoating anything here, Dave. We know that people are doing it tough. We know that. But I would say to young people and indeed, you know, all Australians, have a look at what we have done. Have a look at what we have managed to achieve in a situation where many, many other countries have been unable to achieve what we have. And, you know, it was, Peter Dutton said it the other day, he said judge people by their actions. And I would say if you were to judge the Labor government over the last two and a half years by the actions that we have taken to stave off for Australians some of the most egregious and worst impacts that we could have had, with global inflation being what it is, with the global economic headwinds being what they are, I think that if you looked at what we’ve done I think we have a good story to tell. By no means does that mean everything is hunky dory and everyone’s doing, you know, ‘beauty one mate’. But it does mean that we are conscious of people doing it tough. There’s more work to do.

    MARCHESE: I didn’t expect you to quote Peter Dutton in your pitch to voters, Anne Aly. But look, thank you very much for joining us. Youth Minister Anne Aly appreciate you coming on Hack.

    ALY: Thaks so much Dave. Appreciate you having me on.

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI USA: DLNR News Release – DREDGING WORK AT MĀLA BOAT RAMP STARTS NEXT WEEK, March 25, 2025

    Source: US State of Hawaii

    DLNR News Release – DREDGING WORK AT MĀLA BOAT RAMP STARTS NEXT WEEK, March 25, 2025

    Posted on Mar 25, 2025 in Latest Department News, Newsroom

     

    STATE OF HAWAIʻI

    KA MOKU ʻĀINA O HAWAIʻI

     

    DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES

    KA ‘OIHANA KUMUWAIWAI ‘ĀINA

     

    JOSH GREEN, M.D.
    GOVERNOR

     

    DAWN CHANG
    CHAIRPERSON

    DREDGING WORK AT MĀLA BOAT RAMP STARTS NEXT WEEK

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 

    March 25, 2025

     

    LAHAINA, Maui – The DLNR Division of Boating and Ocean Recreation (DOBOR) has awarded a contract to American Marine Corporation for dredging work to remove accumulated sediment at the Māla Boat Ramp and entrance channel, which will include temporary stockpiling and upland disposal/reuse of dredged material.

     

    Dredging work is scheduled to begin on March 31, 2025, with an estimated completion date of late September 2025. The project cost is $1,061,000.

     

    The boat ramp and entrance channel are expected to remain open throughout the duration of the project, but users should be aware that there may be intermittent interruptions. The contractor will work closely with users to ensure impacts are kept to a minimum.

     

    “We recognize the importance Māla Ramp has to west Maui users, especially with Lahaina Harbor closed for rebuilding, and we want to thank the users for their patience while DOBOR worked on funding and regulatory approvals to get this project started,” said Meghan Statts, DOBOR Administrator. “We also want to thank the legislature for providing the funding and the Governor for working quickly to release the funding.”

     

    # # #

     

    RESOURCES

    (All images/video Courtesy: DLNR)

     

    HD Video – Māla Wharf (April 9, 2024):

    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/5kmsyea6br3qgqgcgr62n/mala_wharf-_april_9-_2024-1080p.mp4?rlkey=w84ch0nhp64ws23o6f146844y&st=84564f90&dl=0

     

    HD Video – Māla Wharf (Sept. 26, 2023):

    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/2b2nvvrhqqi7to5u9e614/mala_wharf-_sept._26-_2023-1080p.mp4?rlkey=vn70vkqcoc0eixxum7qdah34r&st=58gy5j7n&dl=0

     

    Photographs – Māla Wharf, Maui (April 9, 2024):

    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/mygdf9v138do1vrt26gf5/AAuUvnbvQ4ycHfFRK8xUWYI?rlkey=7yz5mg2eui36yvrbefkg8e2kc&st=0jdaoam1&dl=0

     

    Photographs – Māla Wharf, Maui (Sept. 26, 2023):

    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/dedgvltgjwlk70m6qrbrn/AEbgRTbkzB6r2e0UISUp8c8?rlkey=wnfreuernlnisfx8r4auxhv2d&st=x7nyfji5&dl=0

     

     

    Media Contact: 

    Ryan Aguilar

    Communications Specialist

    Hawai‘i Dept. of Land and Natural Resources

    808-587-0396 

    Email: [email protected] 

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI: YieldMax™ ETFs Announces Distributions on PLTY (100.21%), MARO (75.43%), ULTY (75.27%), MRNY (69.46%), LFGY (61.87%), and Others

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    CHICAGO and MILWAUKEE and NEW YORK, March 26, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — YieldMax™ today announced distributions for the YieldMax™ Weekly Payers and Group B ETFs listed in the table below.

    ETF Ticker1 ETF Name Distribution Frequency Distribution per Share Distribution Rate2,4 30-Day
    SEC Yield3
    ROC5 Ex-Date & Record Date Payment Date
    GPTY YieldMax™ AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF Weekly $0.2787 34.11% 0.00% 98.94% 3/27/25 3/28/25
    LFGY YieldMax™ Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF Weekly $0.4749 61.87% 0.00% 0.00% 3/27/25 3/28/25
    QDTY YieldMax™ Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call ETF Weekly $0.2711 55.02% 3/27/25 3/28/25
    RDTY YieldMax™ R2000 0DTE Covered
    Call ETF
    Weekly $0.3037 100.00% 3/27/25 3/28/25
    SDTY YieldMax™ S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call ETF Weekly $0.2133 0.00% 3/27/25 3/28/25
    ULTY YieldMax™ Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF Weekly $0.0986 75.27% 0.00% 100.00% 3/27/25 3/28/25
    YMAG YieldMax™ Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs Weekly $0.0837 27.36% 61.87% 21.53% 3/27/25 3/28/25
    YMAX YieldMax™ Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs Weekly $0.1315 47.15% 85.03% 61.95% 3/27/25 3/28/25
    BABO YieldMax™ BABA Option Income Strategy ETF Every 4 Weeks $0.7578 47.80% 2.36% 0.00% 3/27/25 3/28/25
    DIPS YieldMax™ Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF Every 4 Weeks $0.5851 61.41% 2.90% 96.87% 3/27/25 3/28/25
    FBY YieldMax™ META Option Income Strategy ETF Every 4 Weeks $0.5506 39.97% 3.47% 0.00% 3/27/25 3/28/25
    GDXY YieldMax™ Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF Every 4 Weeks $0.6394 50.38% 3.08% 0.00% 3/27/25 3/28/25
    JPMO YieldMax™ JPM Option Income Strategy ETF Every 4 Weeks $0.3717 28.32% 3.40% 42.17% 3/27/25 3/28/25
    MARO YieldMax™ MARA Option Income Strategy ETF Every 4 Weeks $1.4783 75.43% 4.21% 95.22% 3/27/25 3/28/25
    MRNY YieldMax™ MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF Every 4 Weeks $0.1827 69.46% 5.01% 94.71% 3/27/25 3/28/25
    NVDY YieldMax™ NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF Every 4 Weeks $0.7874 57.94% 4.02% 100.00% 3/27/25 3/28/25
    PLTY YieldMax™ PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF Every 4 Weeks $5.3257 100.21% 2.63% 97.91% 3/27/25 3/28/25
    Weekly Payers & Group C ETFs scheduled for next week: GPTY LFGY QDTY RDTY SDTY ULTY YMAG YMAX ABNY AMDY CONY CVNY FIAT MSFO NFLY PYPY


    Performance data quoted represents past performance and is no guarantee of future results. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when sold or redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost and current performance may be lower or higher than the performance quoted above. Performance current to the most recent month-end can be obtained by calling 
    (833) 378-0717.

    Note: DIPS, FIAT, CRSH and YQQQ are hereinafter referred to as the “Short ETFs”.

    Distributions are not guaranteed. The Distribution Rate and 30-Day SEC Yield are not indicative of future distributions, if any, on the ETFs. In particular, future distributions on any ETF may differ significantly from its Distribution Rate or 30-Day SEC Yield. You are not guaranteed a distribution under the ETFs. Distributions for the ETFs (if any) are variable and may vary significantly from period to period and may be zero. Accordingly, the Distribution Rate and 30-Day SEC Yield will change over time, and such change may be significant.

    Investors in the Funds will not have rights to receive dividends or other distributions with respect to the underlying reference asset(s).

       
    1 All YieldMax™ ETFs shown in the table above (except YMAX, YMAG, FEAT, FIVY and ULTY) have a gross expense ratio of 0.99%. YMAX, YMAG and FEAT have a Management Fee of 0.29% and Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses of 0.99% for a gross expense ratio of 1.28%. FIVY has a Management Fee of 0.29% and Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses of 0.59% for a gross expense ratio of 0.88%. “Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses” are indirect fees and expenses that the Fund incurs from investing in the shares of other investment companies, namely other YieldMax™ ETFs. ULTY has a gross expense ratio after the fee waiver of 1.30%. The Advisor has agreed to a fee waiver of 0.10% through at least February 28, 2026.
    2 The Distribution Rate shown is as of close on March 25, 2025. The Distribution Rate is the annual distribution rate an investor would receive if the most recent distribution, which includes option income, remained the same going forward. The Distribution Rate is calculated by annualizing an ETF’s Distribution per Share and dividing such annualized amount by the ETF’s most recent NAV. The Distribution Rate represents a single distribution from the ETF and does not represent its total return. Distributions may also include a combination of ordinary dividends, capital gain, and return of investor capital, which may decrease an ETF’s NAV and trading price over time. As a result, an investor may suffer significant losses to their investment. These Distribution Rates may be caused by unusually favorable market conditions and may not be sustainable. Such conditions may not continue to exist and there should be no expectation that this performance may be repeated in the future.
    3 The 30-Day SEC Yield represents net investment income, which excludes option income, earned by such ETF over the 30-Day period ended February 28, 2025, expressed as an annual percentage rate based on such ETF’s share price at the end of the 30-Day period.
    4 Each ETF’s strategy (except those of the Short ETFs) will cap potential gains if its reference asset’s shares increase in value, yet subjects an investor to all potential losses if the reference asset’s shares decrease in value. Such potential losses may not be offset by income received by the ETF. Each Short ETF’s strategy will cap potential gains if its reference asset decreases in value, yet subjects an investor to all potential losses if the reference asset increases in value. Such potential losses may not be offset by income received by the ETF.
    5 ROC refers to Return of Capital. The ROC percentage is the portion of the distribution that represents an investor’s original investment.
       

    Each Fund has a limited operating history and while each Fund’s objective is to provide current income, there is no guarantee the Fund will make a distribution. Distributions are likely to vary greatly in amount.

    Standardized Performance

    For YMAX, click here. For YMAG, click here. For TSLY, click here. For OARK, click here. For APLY, click here. For NVDY, click here. For AMZY, click here. For FBY, click here. For GOOY, click here. For NFLY, click here. For CONY, click here. For MSFO, click here. For DISO, click here. For XOMO, click here. For JPMO, click here. For AMDY, click here. For PYPY, click here. For SQY, click here. For MRNY, click here. For AIYY, click here. For MSTY, click here. For ULTY, click here. For YBIT, click here. For CRSH, click here. For GDXY, click here. For SNOY, click here. For ABNY, click here. For FIAT, click here. For DIPS, click here. For BABO, click here. For YQQQ, click here. For TSMY, click here. For SMCY, click here. For PLTY, click here. For BIGY, click here. For SOXY, click here. For MARO, click here. For FEAT, click here. For FIVY, click here. For LFGY, click here. For GPTY, click here. For CVNY, click here. For SDTY, click here. For QDTY, click here. For RDTY, click here.

    Important Information

    This material must be preceded or accompanied by the prospectus. For all prospectuses, click here.

    Tidal Financial Group is the adviser for all YieldMax™ ETFs.

    THE FUND, TRUST, AND ADVISER ARE NOT AFFILIATED WITH ANY UNDERLYING REFERENCE ASSET.

    Risk Disclosures (applicable to all YieldMax ETFs referenced above, except the Short ETFs)

    YMAX, YMAG, FEAT and FIVY generally invest in other YieldMax™ ETFs. As such, these two Funds are subject to the risks listed in this section, which apply to all the YieldMax™ ETFs they may hold from time to time.

    Investing involves risk. Principal loss is possible.

    Call Writing Strategy Risk. The path dependency (i.e., the continued use) of the Fund’s call writing strategy will impact the extent that the Fund participates in the positive price returns of the underlying reference asset and, in turn, the Fund’s returns, both during the term of the sold call options and over longer periods.

    Counterparty Risk. The Fund is subject to counterparty risk by virtue of its investments in options contracts. Transactions in some types of derivatives, including options, are required to be centrally cleared (“cleared derivatives”). In a transaction involving cleared derivatives, the Fund’s counterparty is a clearing house rather than a bank or broker. Since the Fund is not a member of clearing houses and only members of a clearing house (“clearing members”) can participate directly in the clearing house, the Fund will hold cleared derivatives through accounts at clearing members.

    Derivatives Risk. Derivatives are financial instruments that derive value from the underlying reference asset or assets, such as stocks, bonds, or funds (including ETFs), interest rates or indexes. The Fund’s investments in derivatives may pose risks in addition to, and greater than, those associated with directly investing in securities or other ordinary investments, including risk related to the market, imperfect correlation with underlying investments or the Fund’s other portfolio holdings, higher price volatility, lack of availability, counterparty risk, liquidity, valuation and legal restrictions.

    Options Contracts. The use of options contracts involves investment strategies and risks different from those associated with ordinary portfolio securities transactions. The prices of options are volatile and are influenced by, among other things, actual and anticipated changes in the value of the underlying instrument, including the anticipated volatility, which are affected by fiscal and monetary policies and by national and international political, changes in the actual or implied volatility or the reference asset, the time remaining until the expiration of the option contract and economic events.

    Distribution Risk. As part of the Fund’s investment objective, the Fund seeks to provide current income. There is no assurance that the Fund will make a distribution in any given period. If the Fund does make distributions, the amounts of such distributions will likely vary greatly from one distribution to the next.

    High Portfolio Turnover Risk. The Fund may actively and frequently trade all or a significant portion of the Fund’s holdings. A high portfolio turnover rate increases transaction costs, which may increase the Fund’s expenses.

    Liquidity Risk. Some securities held by the Fund, including options contracts, may be difficult to sell or be illiquid, particularly during times of market turmoil.

    Non-Diversification Risk. Because the Fund is “non-diversified,” it may invest a greater percentage of its assets in the securities of a single issuer or a smaller number of issuers than if it was a diversified fund.

    New Fund Risk. The Fund is a recently organized management investment company with no operating history. As a result, prospective investors do not have a track record or history on which to base their investment decisions.

    Price Participation Risk. The Fund employs an investment strategy that includes the sale of call option contracts, which limits the degree to which the Fund will participate in increases in value experienced by the underlying reference asset over the Call Period.

    Single Issuer Risk. Issuer-specific attributes may cause an investment in the Fund to be more volatile than a traditional pooled investment which diversifies risk or the market generally. The value of the Fund, which focuses on an individual security (ARKK, TSLA, AAPL, NVDA, AMZN, META, GOOGL, NFLX, COIN, MSFT, DIS, XOM, JPM, AMD, PYPL, SQ, MRNA, AI, MSTR, Bitcoin ETP, GDX®, SNOW, ABNB, BABA, TSM, SMCI, PLTR, MARA, CVNA), may be more volatile than a traditional pooled investment or the market as a whole and may perform differently from the value of a traditional pooled investment or the market as a whole.

    Inflation Risk. Inflation risk is the risk that the value of assets or income from investments will be less in the future as inflation decreases the value of money. As inflation increases, the present value of the Fund’s assets and distributions, if any, may decline.

    Indirect Investment Risk. The Index is not affiliated with the Trust, the Fund, the Adviser, or their respective affiliates and is not involved with this offering in any way.

    Risk Disclosures (applicable only to GPTY)

    Artificial Intelligence Risk. Issuers engaged in artificial intelligence typically have high research and capital expenditures and, as a result, their profitability can vary widely, if they are profitable at all. The space in which they are engaged is highly competitive and issuers’ products and services may become obsolete very quickly. These companies are heavily dependent on intellectual property rights and may be adversely affected by loss or impairment of those rights. The issuers are also subject to legal, regulatory and political changes that may have a large impact on their profitability. A failure in an issuer’s product or even questions about the safety of the product could be devastating to the issuer, especially if it is the marquee product of the issuer. It can be difficult to accurately capture what qualifies as an artificial intelligence company.

    Technology Sector Risk. The Fund will invest substantially in companies in the information technology sector, and therefore the performance of the Fund could be negatively impacted by events affecting this sector. Market or economic factors impacting technology companies and companies that rely heavily on technological advances could have a significant effect on the value of the Fund’s investments. The value of stocks of information technology companies and companies that rely heavily on technology is particularly vulnerable to rapid changes in technology product cycles, rapid product obsolescence, government regulation and competition, both domestically and internationally, including competition from foreign competitors with lower production costs. Stocks of information technology companies and companies that rely heavily on technology, especially those of smaller, less-seasoned companies, tend to be more volatile than the overall market. Information technology companies are heavily dependent on patent and intellectual property rights, the loss or impairment of which may adversely affect profitability.

    Risk Disclosure (applicable only to MARO)

    Digital Assets Risk: The Fund does not invest directly in Bitcoin or any other digital assets. The Fund does not invest directly in derivatives that track the performance of Bitcoin or any other digital assets. The Fund does not invest in or seek direct exposure to the current “spot” or cash price of Bitcoin. Investors seeking direct exposure to the price of Bitcoin should consider an investment other than the Fund. Digital assets like Bitcoin, designed as mediums of exchange, are still an emerging asset class. They operate independently of any central authority or government backing and are subject to regulatory changes and extreme price volatility.

    Risk Disclosures (applicable only to BABO and TSMY)

    Currency Risk: Indirect exposure to foreign currencies subjects the Fund to the risk that currencies will decline in value relative to the U.S. dollar. Currency rates in foreign countries may fluctuate significantly over short periods of time for a number of reasons, including changes in interest rates and the imposition of currency controls or other political developments in the U.S. or abroad.

    Depositary Receipts Risk: The securities underlying BABO and TSMY are American Depositary Receipts (“ADRs”). Investment in ADRs may be less liquid than the underlying shares in their primary trading market.

    Foreign Market and Trading Risk: The trading markets for many foreign securities are not as active as U.S. markets and may have less governmental regulation and oversight.

    Foreign Securities Risk: Investments in securities of non-U.S. issuers involve certain risks that may not be present with investments in securities of U.S. issuers, such as risk of loss due to foreign currency fluctuations or to political or economic instability, as well as varying regulatory requirements applicable to investments in non-U.S. issuers. There may be less information publicly available about a non-U.S. issuer than a U.S. issuer. Non-U.S. issuers may also be subject to different regulatory, accounting, auditing, financial reporting and investor protection standards than U.S. issuers.

    Risk Disclosures (applicable only to GDXY)

    Risk of Investing in Foreign Securities. The Fund is exposed indirectly to the securities of foreign issuers selected by GDX®’s investment adviser, which subjects the Fund to the risks associated with such companies. Investments in the securities of foreign issuers involve risks beyond those associated with investments in U.S. securities.

    Risk of Investing in Gold and Silver Mining Companies. The Fund is exposed indirectly to gold and silver mining companies selected by GDX®’s investment adviser, which subjects the Fund to the risks associated with such companies.

    The Fund invests in options contracts based on the value of the VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX®), which subjects the Fund to some of the same risks as if it owned GDX®, as well as the risks associated with Canadian, Australian and Emerging Market Issuers, and Small-and Medium-Capitalization companies.

    Risk Disclosures (applicable only to YBIT)

    YBIT does not invest directly in Bitcoin or any other digital assets. YBIT does not invest directly in derivatives that track the performance of Bitcoin or any other digital assets. YBIT does not invest in or seek direct exposure to the current “spot” or cash price of Bitcoin. Investors seeking direct exposure to the price of Bitcoin should consider an investment other than YBIT.

    Bitcoin Investment Risk: The Fund’s indirect investment in Bitcoin, through holdings in one or more Underlying ETPs, exposes it to the unique risks of this emerging innovation. Bitcoin’s price is highly volatile, and its market is influenced by the changing Bitcoin network, fluctuating acceptance levels, and unpredictable usage trends.

    Digital Assets Risk: Digital assets like Bitcoin, designed as mediums of exchange, are still an emerging asset class. They operate independently of any central authority or government backing and are subject to regulatory changes and extreme price volatility. Potentially No 1940 Act Protections. As of the date of this Prospectus, there is only a single eligible Underlying ETP, and it is an investment company subject to the 1940 Act.

    Bitcoin ETP Risk: The Fund invests in options contracts that are based on the value of the Bitcoin ETP. This subjects the Fund to certain of the same risks as if it owned shares of the Bitcoin ETP, even though it does not. Bitcoin ETPs are subject, but not limited, to significant risk and heightened volatility. An investor in a Bitcoin ETP may lose their entire investment. Bitcoin ETPs are not suitable for all investors. In addition, not all Bitcoin ETPs are registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940. Those Bitcoin ETPs that are not registered under such statute are therefore not subject to the same regulations as exchange traded products that are so registered.

    Risk Disclosures (applicable only to the Short ETFs)

    Investing involves risk. Principal loss is possible.

    Price Appreciation Risk. As part of the Fund’s synthetic covered put strategy, the Fund purchases and sells call and put option contracts that are based on the value of the underlying reference asset. This strategy subjects the Fund to certain of the same risks as if it shorted the underlying reference asset, even though it does not. By virtue of the Fund’s indirect inverse exposure to changes in the value of the underlying reference asset, the Fund is subject to the risk that the value of the underlying reference asset increases. If the value of the underlying reference asset increases, the Fund will likely lose value and, as a result, the Fund may suffer significant losses.

    Put Writing Strategy Risk. The path dependency (i.e., the continued use) of the Fund’s put writing (selling) strategy will impact the extent that the Fund participates in decreases in the value of the underlying reference asset and, in turn, the Fund’s returns, both during the term of the sold put options and over longer periods.

    Purchased OTM Call Options Risk. The Fund’s strategy is subject to potential losses if the underlying reference asset increases in value, which may not be offset by the purchase of out-of-the-money (OTM) call options. The Fund purchases OTM calls to seek to manage (cap) the Fund’s potential losses from the Fund’s short exposure to the underlying reference asset if it appreciates significantly in value. However, the OTM call options will cap the Fund’s losses only to the extent that the value of the underlying reference asset increases to a level that is at or above the strike level of the purchased OTM call options. Any increase in the value of the underlying reference asset to a level that is below the strike level of the purchased OTM call options will result in a corresponding loss for the Fund. For example, if the OTM call options have a strike level that is approximately 100% above the then-current value of the underlying reference asset at the time of the call option purchase, and the value of the underlying reference asset increases by at least 100% during the term of the purchased OTM call options, the Fund will lose all its value. Since the Fund bears the costs of purchasing the OTM calls, such costs will decrease the Fund’s value and/or any income otherwise generated by the Fund’s investment strategy.

    Counterparty Risk. The Fund is subject to counterparty risk by virtue of its investments in options contracts. Transactions in some types of derivatives, including options, are required to be centrally cleared (“cleared derivatives”). In a transaction involving cleared derivatives, the Fund’s counterparty is a clearing house rather than a bank or broker. Since the Fund is not a member of clearing houses and only members of a clearing house (“clearing members”) can participate directly in the clearing house, the Fund will hold cleared derivatives through accounts at clearing members.

    Derivatives Risk. Derivatives are financial instruments that derive value from the underlying reference asset or assets, such as stocks, bonds, or funds (including ETFs), interest rates or indexes. The Fund’s investments in derivatives may pose risks in addition to, and greater than, those associated with directly investing in securities or other ordinary investments, including risk related to the market, imperfect correlation with underlying investments or the Fund’s other portfolio holdings, higher price volatility, lack of availability, counterparty risk, liquidity, valuation and legal restrictions.

    Options Contracts. The use of options contracts involves investment strategies and risks different from those associated with ordinary portfolio securities transactions. The prices of options are volatile and are influenced by, among other things, actual and anticipated changes in the value of the underlying reference asset, including the anticipated volatility, which are affected by fiscal and monetary policies and by national and international political, changes in the actual or implied volatility or the reference asset, the time remaining until the expiration of the option contract and economic events.

    Distribution Risk. As part of the Fund’s investment objective, the Fund seeks to provide current income. There is no assurance that the Fund will make a distribution in any given period. If the Fund does make distributions, the amounts of such distributions will likely vary greatly from one distribution to the next.

    High Portfolio Turnover Risk. The Fund may actively and frequently trade all or a significant portion of the Fund’s holdings.

    Liquidity Risk. Some securities held by the Fund, including options contracts, may be difficult to sell or be illiquid, particularly during times of market turmoil.

    Non-Diversification Risk. Because the Fund is “non-diversified,” it may invest a greater percentage of its assets in the securities of a single issuer or a smaller number of issuers than if it was a diversified fund.

    New Fund Risk. The Fund is a recently organized management investment company with no operating history. As a result, prospective investors do not have a track record or history on which to base their investment decisions.

    Price Participation Risk. The Fund employs an investment strategy that includes the sale of put option contracts, which limits the degree to which the Fund will participate in decreases in value experienced by the underlying reference asset over the Put Period.

    Single Issuer Risk. Issuer-specific attributes may cause an investment in the Fund to be more volatile than a traditional pooled investment which diversifies risk or the market generally. The value of the Fund, for any Fund that focuses on an individual security (e.g., TSLA, COIN, NVDA), may be more volatile than a traditional pooled investment or the market as a whole and may perform differently from the value of a traditional pooled investment or the market as a whole.

    Inflation Risk. Inflation risk is the risk that the value of assets or income from investments will be less in the future as inflation decreases the value of money. As inflation increases, the present value of the Fund’s assets and distributions, if any, may decline.

    Risk Disclosures (applicable only to YQQQ)

    Index Overview. The Nasdaq 100 Index is a benchmark index that includes 100 of the largest non-financial companies listed on the Nasdaq Stock Market, based on market capitalization.

    Index Level Appreciation Risk. As part of the Fund’s synthetic covered put strategy, the Fund purchases and sells call and put option contracts that are based on the Index level. This strategy subjects the Fund to certain of the same risks as if it shorted the Index, even though it does not. By virtue of the Fund’s indirect inverse exposure to changes in the Index level, the Fund is subject to the risk that the Index level increases. If the Index level increases, the Fund will likely lose value and, as a result, the Fund may suffer significant losses. The Fund may also be subject to the following risks: innovation and technological advancement; strong market presence of Index constituent companies; adaptability to global market trends; and resilience and recovery potential.

    Index Level Participation Risk. The Fund employs an investment strategy that includes the sale of put option contracts, which limits the degree to which the Fund will benefit from decreases in the Index level experienced over the Put Period. This means that if the Index level experiences a decrease in value below the strike level of the sold put options during a Put Period, the Fund will likely not experience that increase to the same extent and any Fund gains may significantly differ from the level of the Index losses over the Put Period. Additionally, because the Fund is limited in the degree to which it will participate in decreases in value experienced by the Index level over each Put Period, but has significant negative exposure to any increases in value experienced by the Index level over the Put Period, the NAV of the Fund may decrease over any given period. The Fund’s NAV is dependent on the value of each options portfolio, which is based principally upon the inverse of the performance of the Index level. The Fund’s ability to benefit from the Index level decreases will depend on prevailing market conditions, especially market volatility, at the time the Fund enters into the sold put option contracts and will vary from Put Period to Put Period. The value of the options contracts is affected by changes in the value and dividend rates of component companies that comprise the Index, changes in interest rates, changes in the actual or perceived volatility of the Index and the remaining time to the options’ expiration, as well as trading conditions in the options market. As the Index level changes and time moves towards the expiration of each Put Period, the value of the options contracts, and therefore the Fund’s NAV, will change. However, it is not expected for the Fund’s NAV to directly inversely correlate on a day-to-day basis with the returns of the Index level. The amount of time remaining until the options contract’s expiration date affects the impact that the value of the options contracts has on the Fund’s NAV, which may not be in full effect until the expiration date of the Fund’s options contracts. Therefore, while changes in the Index level will result in changes to the Fund’s NAV, the Fund generally anticipates that the rate of change in the Fund’s NAV will be different than the inverse of the changes experienced by the Index level.

    YieldMax™ ETFs are distributed by Foreside Fund Services, LLC. Foreside is not affiliated with Tidal Financial Group, or YieldMax™ ETFs.

    © 2025 YieldMax™ ETFs

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: Trident Announces Strategic Collaboration with Two Global E-Commerce Firms

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    SINGAPORE, March 26, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Trident Digital Tech Holdings Ltd (“Trident” or the “Company,” NASDAQ: TDTH), a leading catalyst for digital transformation in technology optimization services and Web 3.0 activation based in Singapore, today announced it has entered into a strategic collaboration agreement (the “Collaboration Agreement”) with two partners in the e-commerce sector. Per the Collaboration Agreement, Trident will join forces with Silkoo Dutyfree Limited (“Silkoo”), an e-commerce retailer and import-export trader, and Haitu Trade Co., Limited (“Haitu”), an e-commerce entity specializing in beauty and cosmetics, to foster a synergistic partnership that drives business growth, enhances customer satisfaction, and promotes operational efficiency.

    The agreement establishes a framework for cooperation in several key areas, including data analytics, strategic planning, supply chain optimization, platform integration, and customer experience enhancement. As a result of the collaboration, the parties hope to drive mutual growth through consumer data synergies, coordinated market strategies, optimized logistics networks in Southeast Asia, expanded inter-platform ecosystems, and the delivery of seamless, personalized customer experiences that foster loyalty and operational excellence.

    Each company will bring unique operational strengths to the table. Trident will contribute its sophisticated Web 3.0-based digital identity platform, Tridentity, which offers secure authentication across its diverse ecosystem of services including Tri-food, Tri-events, Tri-Buy, and TriVerse. This will create a comprehensive digital experience framework that can serve as the technological backbone for the partnership. Silkoo will provide extensive e-commerce expertise with its established presence in five Southeast Asian countries, along with valuable third-party merchant status on TikTok Global Shop that will drive substantial customer data acquisition and cross-border sales capabilities. Haitu will contribute specialized knowledge in cosmetics and beauty product distribution, bringing its successful experience as a proprietor of an overseas cosmetic account on Pinduoduo, which provides access to diverse global customer segments and market insights.

    Together, these complementary strengths aim to create a powerful alliance that combines Trident’s technological innovation, Silkoo’s regional e-commerce presence, and Haitu’s specialized product expertise to develop an integrated digital commerce ecosystem.

    Soon Huat Lim, Founder, Chairman, and Chief Executive Officer of Trident, stated, “This strategic collaboration represents a significant milestone in our e-commerce journey. By combining our cutting-edge Tridentity platform with Silkoo’s e-commerce network and Haitu’s specialized expertise, we’re creating a powerful ecosystem that transcends traditional boundaries. Our partnership will leverage data analytics, streamlined supply chains, and optimized integration to deliver exceptional customer experiences across multiple touchpoints. Together, we endeavor to expand our market reach while fundamentally reimagining how digital commerce can seamlessly connect consumers with products and services throughout Southeast Asia and across the globe.”

    About Trident
    Trident is a leading catalyst for digital transformation in digital optimization, technology services, and Web 3.0 activation worldwide based in Singapore. The Company offers commercial and technological digital solutions designed to optimize its clients’ experience with their end-users by promoting digital adoption and self-service.

    Tridentity, the Company’s flagship product, is an innovative and highly secure blockchain-based identity solution designed to provide secure single sign-on authentication capabilities to integrated third-party systems across various industries. Tridentity aims to offer unparalleled security features, ensuring the protection of sensitive information and preventing potential threats, thus promising a new secure era in the global digital landscape in general, and in Southeast Asia etc.

    Beyond Tridentity, the Company’s mission is to become the global leader in Web 3.0 activation, notably connecting businesses to a reliable and secure technological platform, with tailored and optimized customer experiences.

    About Silkoo
    Silkoo Dutyfree Limited is primarily engaged in the business of E-commerce, online retail, import and export and trading (electrical equipment, furniture, cosmetics, etc.) Silkoo also owns and operates the “Shepinport” intellectual property across five countries in Southeast Asia, including Singapore, Malaysia, Vietnam, Thailand, and the Philippines. As an authorised third-party merchant on TikTok Global Shop, Silkoo Dutyfree leverages the platform to drive customer data, traffic, and sales, offering a range of products to its customers.

    About Haitu
    Haitu Trade Co. Limited is a specialized e-commerce entity principally engaged in the online retail and distribution of cosmetics and beauty products. Notably, the company is the proprietor of an overseas cosmetic account on the Pin Duo Duo (PDD) platform, thereby leveraging this prominent digital marketplace to cater to a diverse customer base across different regions in the world.

    Safe Harbor Statement
    This announcement contains statements that may constitute “forward-looking” statements pursuant to the “safe harbor” provisions of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements can be identified by terminology such as “will,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “aims,” “future,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “estimates,” “likely to,” and similar statements. The Company may also make written or oral forward-looking statements in its periodic reports to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), in its annual report to shareholders, in announcements and other written materials, and in oral statements made by its officers, directors, or employees to third parties. Statements that are not historical facts, including statements about the Company’s beliefs, plans, and expectations, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties. A number of factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement, including but not limited to the following: the Company’s strategies, future business development, and financial condition and results of operations; the expected growth of the digital solutions market; the political, economic, social and legal developments in the jurisdictions that the Company operates in or in which the Company intends to expand its business and operations; the Company’s ability to maintain and enhance its brand. Further information regarding these and other risks is included in the Company’s filings with the SEC. All information provided in this announcement is as of the date of this announcement, and the Company does not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statement, except as required under applicable law.

    Investor and Media Contacts
    Investor Relations
    Robin Yang, Partner
    ICR, LLC
    Email: investor@tridentity.me
    Phone: +1 (212) 321-0602

    Media Relations
    Brad Burgess, SVP
    ICR, LLC
    Email: Brad.Burgess@icrinc.com

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Government unlocks export growth opportunities for New Zealand dairy businesses

    Source: New Zealand Government

    The Government’s commitment to growing the value of New Zealand’s dairy exports has taken a major step forward with the passing of a key Bill in Parliament, Agriculture Minister Todd McClay announced today.

    “The Dairy Industry Restructuring (Export Licences Allocation) Amendment Bill, which passed its third reading today, modernises New Zealand’s dairy export quota system, creating new opportunities for growth and boosting farmgate returns,” Mr McClay says.

    “New Zealand’s dairy farmers and processors produce world-class products, but outdated rules have restricted export growth. This law unlocks greater access to lucrative overseas markets and ensures the quota system reflects the diversity of our dairy industry.”

    New Zealand currently administers dairy export quotas for the Dominican Republic, the European Union, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

    “The Bill introduces vital changes to better support businesses of all sizes, and it shifts quota allocation from the proportion of milk solids a company collects from farmers to a system based on export performance,” Mr McClay says.

    “It also reserves portions of quotas for exporters who are currently ineligible — ensuring fairer access across the industry.

    “And importantly, it now includes quota for sheep, goat, and deer milk processors, unlocking new export opportunities and revenue streams.”

    Mr McClay says the Bill directly supports the Government’s ambitious goal of doubling the value of New Zealand’s exports in 10 years.

    The commencement date for the Bill is 1 May 2025.

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI China: MOFA response to Japanese Foreign Minister Iwaya reaffirming importance of cross-strait peace in meeting with Chinese Foreign Minister Wang

    Source: Republic of Taiwan – Ministry of Foreign Affairs

    MOFA response to Japanese Foreign Minister Iwaya reaffirming importance of cross-strait peace in meeting with Chinese Foreign Minister Wang

    • Date:2025-03-23
    • Data Source:TAIWAN-JAPAN RELATIONS ASSOCIATION

    March 23, 2025

    Japanese Minister for Foreign Affairs Takeshi Iwaya met with Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi in Tokyo on March 22. During the meeting, Minister Iwaya expressed concern over China’s military activities targeting Taiwan and reiterated that peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait were of utmost importance to Japan and the international community. He also called for the peaceful resolution of cross-strait issues and opposed any attempts to unilaterally change the status quo by force or coercion. 

    The government of Japan has repeatedly emphasized the importance of cross-strait peace and stability at major international events in recent years, urging the global community to pay attention to security across the Taiwan Strait. These events included the US-Japan summit and the trilateral meeting between the US secretary of state and the foreign ministers of Japan and the Republic of Korea on the sidelines of the Munich Security Conference, both in February, as well as the Group of Seven foreign ministers’ meeting in March.

    Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung thanks Japan for continuing to follow security developments across the Taiwan Strait and staunchly supporting cross-strait peace and stability. He stresses that Taiwan has consistently welcomed international actions that contribute to safeguarding regional peace. Taiwan is committed to steadily enhancing its self-defense capabilities and bolstering cooperation with like-minded nations to jointly uphold peace, stability, and prosperity across the Taiwan Strait and the Indo-Pacific.

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI China: MOFA and Ministry of Agriculture to form new smart agriculture advisory team to promote Diplomatic Allies Prosperity Project

    Source: Republic of Taiwan – Ministry of Foreign Affairs

    March 24, 2025
    No. 082

    In a cross-ministerial meeting at the Ministry of Agriculture (MOA) on March 24, Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung and Minister of Agriculture Chen Junne-jih decided to form a new smart agriculture advisory team. The team will bring together public and private resources from the government, industry, academia, research institutions, the agricultural industry, and other sectors. In the spirit of integrated diplomacy, the new group will jointly implement a smart agriculture flagship plan under the Diplomatic Allies Prosperity Project. 

    Through coordination with diplomatic allies and friendly countries, the plan will enhance AI and digital technology applications in precision agriculture and other areas. Taiwan will work with partner countries to develop new smart agriculture, promote an agricultural Taiwan+n model (where n refers to a growing number of partners), and help the Taiwanese agricultural industry expand globally. Collaboration between Taiwan, partner countries, and friendly nations will also strengthen global food security, improve agricultural sustainability and resilience, and deliver a concerted response to the challenges of climate change.

    During the meeting at MOA, Minister Lin, Minister Chen, and their staff discussed how to expand agricultural cooperation projects with allies and friendly countries and create reciprocal and mutually beneficial business opportunities. They explored ways to assist countries in upgrading and transforming their farming sectors, increasing productivity and competitiveness, and achieving sustainable development. Potential avenues included technical cooperation, professional training, the establishment of demonstration sites, and business and investment matchmaking. The officials also discussed how to train young farmers and specialists in new smart agriculture both in Taiwan and target countries to give them a competitive edge.

    Meanwhile, the ministers deliberated on three key projects—expanding agricultural cooperation between Taiwan and the Philippines under the Executive Yuan’s economic diplomacy task force, further promoting smart aquacultural cooperation with Palau to develop its tourism industry, and exploring the possibility of cooperation to establish a seedling center in the Caribbean. They also exchanged views on organizing an agricultural trade goodwill mission to the United States in September.

    The agricultural industry is the bedrock of Taiwan’s economy and food security. President Lai Ching-te’s National Project of Hope includes the promotion of agricultural transformation and advancement to achieve sustainable resilience. The Executive Yuan’s Smart Taiwan 2.0 initiative also develops creative applications across various sectors. Under these policies and based on the new agriculture section of the Five Plus Two Industrial Innovation program, Minister Lin has launched a raft of new initiatives. These include promoting the concept of new smart agriculture; expanding applications of AI and smart solutions in agricultural production, management, and marketing; collaborating with MOA’s smart agriculture alliances; transforming agriculture to become smarter and more sustainable; and creating an international fleet focused on Taiwan’s new smart agriculture.

    Looking ahead, MOFA and MOA will continue working with partners from various sectors to assist diplomatic allies and friendly countries in adopting smart agricultural technology to enhance food security, realize sustainable development, and create shared prosperity and mutual benefits. In line with President Lai’s vision for sustainable resilience, the ministries will further contribute to global agricultural development and food security. MOFA and MOA will jointly support the efforts of Taiwanese agricultural businesses to expand their presence in the international market and ensure that Taiwan remains a thriving global economic powerhouse. (E) 

    MIL OSI China News