NewzIntel.com

Category: Australia

  • MIL-OSI USA: Warner & Kaine Applaud Congressional Reapproval of VA Medical Facility Leases

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Commonwealth of Virginia Mark R Warner

    WASHINGTON – Today, U.S. Sens. Mark R. Warner and Tim Kaine (both D-VA) issued the following statement after the House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs voted to approve updated authorizations for 18 Veterans Affairs (VA) major medical facility leases – the final congressional committee needed to greenlight the leases, including one for a proposed outpatient clinic in Hampton Roads:

    “We’re very pleased that all four congressional committees have now approved these much-needed VA leases, including the proposed new outpatient clinic in Hampton Roads. This is a major step forward in expanding access to high-quality, convenient care for the more than 60 percent of Hampton VA Medical Center patients who live on the south side of the region. For years, we’ve pushed to get these kinds of facilities authorized and built, because we refuse to accept a system where veterans are stuck with long wait times or forced to travel hours for basic appointments. With this final vote, we are one step closer to ensuring these long-overdue facilities become a reality.

    “Now that the leases have cleared every hurdle in Congress, we’ll be pushing the VA and GSA to award these leases, and make sure these projects get off the ground without delay. Our veterans have waited long enough.” 

    While these leases were originally authorized under the PACT Act, which both senators strongly supported, updated cost estimates and rent bids prompted the VA and the General Services Administration (GSA) to seek reauthorization from four congressional committees. With yesterday’s action by the House Veterans’ Affairs Committee, the leases have now been reauthorized by all four needed committees: the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, the Senate Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and the House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs.

    Sens. Warner and Kaine have long fought to expand health care and benefits for Virginia’s nearly 700,000 veterans. Sens. Warner and Kaine began raising the alarm about the significant backlog of unapproved VA leases in 2016. After putting significant pressure on officials across the federal government, Congress unanimously passed the Providing Veterans Overdue Care Act, legislation written by Sen. Warner and supported by Sen. Kaine, to cut the backlog and get over two dozen delayed VA medical facilities’ leases approved.

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Warner & Kaine Applaud Congressional Reapproval of VA Medical Facility Leases

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Commonwealth of Virginia Mark R Warner

    WASHINGTON – Today, U.S. Sens. Mark R. Warner and Tim Kaine (both D-VA) issued the following statement after the House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs voted to approve updated authorizations for 18 Veterans Affairs (VA) major medical facility leases – the final congressional committee needed to greenlight the leases, including one for a proposed outpatient clinic in Hampton Roads:

    “We’re very pleased that all four congressional committees have now approved these much-needed VA leases, including the proposed new outpatient clinic in Hampton Roads. This is a major step forward in expanding access to high-quality, convenient care for the more than 60 percent of Hampton VA Medical Center patients who live on the south side of the region. For years, we’ve pushed to get these kinds of facilities authorized and built, because we refuse to accept a system where veterans are stuck with long wait times or forced to travel hours for basic appointments. With this final vote, we are one step closer to ensuring these long-overdue facilities become a reality.

    “Now that the leases have cleared every hurdle in Congress, we’ll be pushing the VA and GSA to award these leases, and make sure these projects get off the ground without delay. Our veterans have waited long enough.” 

    While these leases were originally authorized under the PACT Act, which both senators strongly supported, updated cost estimates and rent bids prompted the VA and the General Services Administration (GSA) to seek reauthorization from four congressional committees. With yesterday’s action by the House Veterans’ Affairs Committee, the leases have now been reauthorized by all four needed committees: the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, the Senate Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and the House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs.

    Sens. Warner and Kaine have long fought to expand health care and benefits for Virginia’s nearly 700,000 veterans. Sens. Warner and Kaine began raising the alarm about the significant backlog of unapproved VA leases in 2016. After putting significant pressure on officials across the federal government, Congress unanimously passed the Providing Veterans Overdue Care Act, legislation written by Sen. Warner and supported by Sen. Kaine, to cut the backlog and get over two dozen delayed VA medical facilities’ leases approved.

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Warner & Kaine Applaud Congressional Reapproval of VA Medical Facility Leases

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Commonwealth of Virginia Mark R Warner

    WASHINGTON – Today, U.S. Sens. Mark R. Warner and Tim Kaine (both D-VA) issued the following statement after the House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs voted to approve updated authorizations for 18 Veterans Affairs (VA) major medical facility leases – the final congressional committee needed to greenlight the leases, including one for a proposed outpatient clinic in Hampton Roads:

    “We’re very pleased that all four congressional committees have now approved these much-needed VA leases, including the proposed new outpatient clinic in Hampton Roads. This is a major step forward in expanding access to high-quality, convenient care for the more than 60 percent of Hampton VA Medical Center patients who live on the south side of the region. For years, we’ve pushed to get these kinds of facilities authorized and built, because we refuse to accept a system where veterans are stuck with long wait times or forced to travel hours for basic appointments. With this final vote, we are one step closer to ensuring these long-overdue facilities become a reality.

    “Now that the leases have cleared every hurdle in Congress, we’ll be pushing the VA and GSA to award these leases, and make sure these projects get off the ground without delay. Our veterans have waited long enough.” 

    While these leases were originally authorized under the PACT Act, which both senators strongly supported, updated cost estimates and rent bids prompted the VA and the General Services Administration (GSA) to seek reauthorization from four congressional committees. With yesterday’s action by the House Veterans’ Affairs Committee, the leases have now been reauthorized by all four needed committees: the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, the Senate Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and the House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs.

    Sens. Warner and Kaine have long fought to expand health care and benefits for Virginia’s nearly 700,000 veterans. Sens. Warner and Kaine began raising the alarm about the significant backlog of unapproved VA leases in 2016. After putting significant pressure on officials across the federal government, Congress unanimously passed the Providing Veterans Overdue Care Act, legislation written by Sen. Warner and supported by Sen. Kaine, to cut the backlog and get over two dozen delayed VA medical facilities’ leases approved.

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Warner & Kaine Applaud Congressional Reapproval of VA Medical Facility Leases

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Commonwealth of Virginia Mark R Warner

    WASHINGTON – Today, U.S. Sens. Mark R. Warner and Tim Kaine (both D-VA) issued the following statement after the House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs voted to approve updated authorizations for 18 Veterans Affairs (VA) major medical facility leases – the final congressional committee needed to greenlight the leases, including one for a proposed outpatient clinic in Hampton Roads:

    “We’re very pleased that all four congressional committees have now approved these much-needed VA leases, including the proposed new outpatient clinic in Hampton Roads. This is a major step forward in expanding access to high-quality, convenient care for the more than 60 percent of Hampton VA Medical Center patients who live on the south side of the region. For years, we’ve pushed to get these kinds of facilities authorized and built, because we refuse to accept a system where veterans are stuck with long wait times or forced to travel hours for basic appointments. With this final vote, we are one step closer to ensuring these long-overdue facilities become a reality.

    “Now that the leases have cleared every hurdle in Congress, we’ll be pushing the VA and GSA to award these leases, and make sure these projects get off the ground without delay. Our veterans have waited long enough.” 

    While these leases were originally authorized under the PACT Act, which both senators strongly supported, updated cost estimates and rent bids prompted the VA and the General Services Administration (GSA) to seek reauthorization from four congressional committees. With yesterday’s action by the House Veterans’ Affairs Committee, the leases have now been reauthorized by all four needed committees: the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, the Senate Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and the House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs.

    Sens. Warner and Kaine have long fought to expand health care and benefits for Virginia’s nearly 700,000 veterans. Sens. Warner and Kaine began raising the alarm about the significant backlog of unapproved VA leases in 2016. After putting significant pressure on officials across the federal government, Congress unanimously passed the Providing Veterans Overdue Care Act, legislation written by Sen. Warner and supported by Sen. Kaine, to cut the backlog and get over two dozen delayed VA medical facilities’ leases approved.

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Warner & Kaine Applaud Congressional Reapproval of VA Medical Facility Leases

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Commonwealth of Virginia Mark R Warner

    WASHINGTON – Today, U.S. Sens. Mark R. Warner and Tim Kaine (both D-VA) issued the following statement after the House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs voted to approve updated authorizations for 18 Veterans Affairs (VA) major medical facility leases – the final congressional committee needed to greenlight the leases, including one for a proposed outpatient clinic in Hampton Roads:

    “We’re very pleased that all four congressional committees have now approved these much-needed VA leases, including the proposed new outpatient clinic in Hampton Roads. This is a major step forward in expanding access to high-quality, convenient care for the more than 60 percent of Hampton VA Medical Center patients who live on the south side of the region. For years, we’ve pushed to get these kinds of facilities authorized and built, because we refuse to accept a system where veterans are stuck with long wait times or forced to travel hours for basic appointments. With this final vote, we are one step closer to ensuring these long-overdue facilities become a reality.

    “Now that the leases have cleared every hurdle in Congress, we’ll be pushing the VA and GSA to award these leases, and make sure these projects get off the ground without delay. Our veterans have waited long enough.” 

    While these leases were originally authorized under the PACT Act, which both senators strongly supported, updated cost estimates and rent bids prompted the VA and the General Services Administration (GSA) to seek reauthorization from four congressional committees. With yesterday’s action by the House Veterans’ Affairs Committee, the leases have now been reauthorized by all four needed committees: the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, the Senate Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and the House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs.

    Sens. Warner and Kaine have long fought to expand health care and benefits for Virginia’s nearly 700,000 veterans. Sens. Warner and Kaine began raising the alarm about the significant backlog of unapproved VA leases in 2016. After putting significant pressure on officials across the federal government, Congress unanimously passed the Providing Veterans Overdue Care Act, legislation written by Sen. Warner and supported by Sen. Kaine, to cut the backlog and get over two dozen delayed VA medical facilities’ leases approved.

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA News: Fact Sheet: President Donald J. Trump Secures Major Settlement with Columbia University

    Source: US Whitehouse

    SECURING HISTORIC SETTLEMENT WITH COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY: Today, President Donald J. Trump secured a historic settlement with Columbia University to address violations of federal civil rights laws and to restore fairness, merit, and safety in higher education.

    • The agreement ensures Columbia will not engage in unlawful racial discrimination in hiring, admissions, or university programming. Columbia will provide access to all relevant data and information to rigorously assess compliance with its commitment to merit-based hiring and admissions. 
    • Columbia will pay the United States $200 million to settle claims related to discriminatory practices, marking a significant win for accountability in academia.
    • Columbia will also pay the largest employment-discrimination public settlement in almost 20 years. Over $20 million will be paid to resolve alleged civil rights violations against Jewish Columbia employees that occurred on its campus following the October 7, 2023, Hamas terror attacks. This is also the largest ever settlement for victims of anti-Semitism and for workers of any religion.
    • The agreement secures privacy, dignity, and fairness in women’s sports, programing, facilities, and housing.
    • The agreement mandates a comprehensive review of Columbia’s portfolio of programs in regional areas, starting with those relating to the Middle East, and fosters new faculty appointments to promote intellectual diversity.
    • Columbia will strengthen oversight of international students by reviewing admission processes, including by assessing applicants’ reasons for wishing to study in the U.S., sharing relevant data with the Federal Government, and reducing financial dependence on overwhelming international student enrollment.
    • Columbia will enhance campus safety and ensure a safe learning environment by appropriately enforcing strict rules against disruptive protests, prohibiting masked protests, and maintaining trained security officers and ongoing cooperation with the New York Police Department.
    • The agreement establishes robust oversight, including with an independent Resolution Monitor and an Administrator, to ensure Columbia complies with the agreement and federal laws.
    • Consistent with Columbia’s announcement in March, student discipline and rules have been moved from an unaccountable faculty senate to the Office of the Provost, providing for stronger oversight, transparency, and accountability.
    • The agreement reinstates most terminated federal grants, restores Columbia’s eligibility for future grants and awards, and closes pending investigations into the university.

    ADDRESSING DISCRIMINATORY PRACTICES AT COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY: The Trump Administration took action to address Columbia University’s violations of federal civil rights laws, protecting students and upholding fairness in higher education.

    • The settlement culminates after concerning public incidents and subsequent civil rights investigations and actions regarding Columbia’s alleged discrimination on the basis of race and national origin.
    • Columbia’s failure to ensure a safe, non-discriminatory campus environment, including issues with protest policies and disciplinary processes, raised urgent concerns about student safety and free inquiry.
    • By securing this settlement, the Trump Administration is ensuring that Columbia upholds merit-based standards, complies with federal law, and fosters an environment of academic excellence and safety for all students.

    ADVANCING REFORMS IN HIGHER EDUCATION: President Trump is holding elite universities accountable, ensuring they prioritize fairness, merit, and American values.  

    • The Administration has challenged elite universities like Harvard and Columbia for discriminating against student and staff, failing to protect students from violent anti-Semitism, and otherwise failing to be a responsible steward of taxpayer dollars.
    • President Trump signed a Proclamation to safeguard national security by suspending the entry of foreign nationals seeking to study or participate in exchange programs at Harvard University. 
    • The Administration successfully negotiated a resolution with the University of Pennsylvania to keep men out of women’s sports and restore the trophies and records of women.

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI: 74Software: Sustained Momentum Reinforces Long-Term Objectives

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Press Release
    Paris, July 24, 2025

    74Software: Sustained Momentum Reinforces Long-Term Objectives

    • Group H1 2025 revenue of €344.0m, up 6.5% organically and 6.2% in total
    • Strong H1 across both brands – Axway up 8.9% to €160.8m and SBS up 5.0% to €184.2m
    • Marked improvement in margin on operating activities, up 585bps to 12.0% of revenue (€41.3m)
    • ARR increased year-on-year by 11.8% at Axway and 10.9% at SBS, further strengthening recurring revenues

    74Software’s Board of Directors, chaired by Pierre Pasquier, approved today the financial statements for the first half of 2025, which were subject to a limited review by the statutory auditors1. Consequently, 74Software announces:

    Half-Year Key Income Statement Items
                       
        Half-year 2025   Half-year 2024
    Proforma
    6M AXW + 6M SBS    		   Half-year 2024
    Reported
    Axway Standalone
        €m % of Rev.   €m % of Rev.   €m % of Rev.
    TOTAL REVENUE   344.0     323.9     148.7  
    GROSS PROFIT   228.1 66.3%   206.8 63.9%   104.7 70.5%
    PROFIT ON OPERATING ACTIVITIES   41.3 12.0%   19.9 6.1%   17.1 11.5%
    OPERATING PROFIT   19.5 5.7%   2.6 0.8%   8.3 5.6%
    NET PROFIT   5.8 1.7%   -15.6 -4.8%   2.8 1.9%
    EARNINGS PER SHARE   0.20 €     -0.54 €     0.13 €  

    Patrick Donovan, Chief Executive Officer, stated:

    “Our H1 results confirm our strong start to the year and demonstrate both the strength of our strategic direction and our ability to execute in-line with our stated plans. As noted in our Q1 press release, the solid early execution front-loads part of the year’s commercial activity— especially in the Axway business. We remain fully committed to our full-year guidance and, more broadly, to our 2027 and 2028 ambitions. Axway is now firmly established as a subscription-first business, while SBS is rapidly scaling its modular banking platforms and expanding its SaaS footprint. With recurring revenue accelerating and capital deployment tightly managed, 74Software is becoming a more structured, resilient, and forward-looking group — built to deliver long-term value creation.”

    Comments on H1 2025 activity

    74Software delivered a strong first-half performance, confirming its ability to execute on its strategic roadmap and capitalize on the operational integration initiated following the transaction closing in September 2024. Revenue growth was solid in both brands, while profitability improved as planned — reflecting the strength of the Group’s model and the improved execution driven by Axway’s infrastructure software expertise and SBS’s leadership in banking software.

    Following a particularly dynamic Q1, the second quarter allowed the Group to consolidate its gains, maintain commercial selectivity, and further shift toward a recurring, scalable revenue model. Axway has now largely transitioned, while SBS continues to advance its own transformation, expanding SaaS deployments and rebalancing its revenue mix in favor of product revenue. Key highlights for the period include:

    • Axway recorded a strong first half, with consistent growth across all product lines. Nearly 60 new customers were signed during the period (+20% year-on-year), with new-name deals accounting for around one-third of Q2 bookings. Large-scale projects gained momentum, including six contracts exceeding €1 million signed in Q2 alone. Demand for cloud-based delivery continued to rise, with Axway-managed deployments representing 40% of Q2 bookings and 35% over the first half. This shift was broad-based, with steady adoption across all geographies and industry verticals.
    • SBS also reported strong results, with product revenue now accounting for 75% of total revenue, up from 67% in H1 2024 — marking significant progress in the company’s shift toward a software-led model. Growth was supported by all product lines, including solid license activity in integrated platforms, components, and financing solutions, as well as continued expansion of modular offerings. The company has now contracted more than 230 SaaS regulatory reporting services, reinforcing adoption across its client base. During the period, SBS welcomed several new clients and completed the first SaaS deployment of its digital engagement platform in Europe. Two additional implementations are scheduled for the third quarter in Africa, where demand is driven by microfinance and Islamic banking. The company’s progress was also recognized through multiple industry awards highlighting its leadership in compliance, payments, and digital banking.

    The Group enters H2 with improving visibility, disciplined execution, and a clear focus on delivering its full-year objectives. Integration of support functions between Axway and SBS is now largely complete, and joint commercial initiatives are steadily expanding across selected regions.

    Comments on H1 2025 operational performance

    Half-year Revenue Breakdown by Portfolio Brand
               
      H1 2025 H1 2024
    Proforma    		 H1 2024
    Restated    		 Total
    Growth    		 Organic
    Growth
    €m / %
    Axway Scope 160.8 148.7 147.6 8.1% 8.9%
    SBS Scope 184.2 175.2 175.4 5.1% 5.0%
               
    Consolidation -1.0 0.0 0.0 – –
               
    74Software 344.0 323.9 323.0 6.2% 6.5%

    In the first half of 2025, the Group generated revenue of €344.0 million, reflecting total growth of 6.2% and organic growth of 6.5% year-on-year. This performance was supported by both brands, with Axway contributing €160.8 million in revenue and organic growth of 8.9%, and SBS contributing €184.2 million with 5.0% organic growth (compared to proforma H1 2024).

    Half-year Revenue Breakdown by Type
               
      H1 2025 H1 2024
    Proforma    		 H1 2024
    Restated    		 Total
    Growth    		 Organic
    Growth
    €m / %
    Product revenue 280.0 248.7 248.1 12.6% 12.9%
    Recurring revenue 258.0 229.3 228.7 12.5% 12.8%
    o/w Maintenance & Support 91.5 96.2 96.0 -4.9% -4.7%
    o/w Customer-managed Subscription 98.7 76.6 76.5 28.8% 29.0%
    o/w Own-managed Subscription 67.8 56.5 56.2 20.0% 20.6%
    License revenue 22.1 19.4 19.4 13.5% 13.7%
               
    Services revenue 64.0 75.2 74.9 -14.9% -14.6%
               
    Total revenue 344.0 323.9 323.0 6.2% 6.5%

    In the first half of 2025, Product revenue reached €280.0 million, up 12.9% organically, reflecting strong execution across both Axway and SBS. The Group continued to benefit from rising demand for subscription-based offers, with both customer-managed and own-managed subscriptions posting growth above 20%. Maintenance revenue declined as anticipated, while license activity increased but remained low at 6.4% of total revenue. Product revenues accounted for 81% of total revenue (up from 77% in H1 2024) and recurring revenues were at 75% of total revenue (up from 71% in H1 2024), confirming 74Software’s successful transition toward a product- and subscription-led model.

    Axway generated €143.3 million in product revenue, up 10.5% organically. Recurring activities made nearly the entire contribution, driven by a 29.5% increase in customer-managed subscriptions and 6.8% growth in own-managed deployments, reflecting continued momentum in hybrid environments. License revenue decreased by 34.9% as the company continues to phase out new license sales. Maintenance and support dropped by 20.6% due to the continued shift of the customer base towards subscription models. Services revenue was slightly lower, down 2.2%, and represented 11% of Axway’s total.

    SBS recorded €137.7 million in product revenue, up 16.3% organically, with strong performance across all product categories. Own-managed subscriptions rose by 35.2%, customer-managed subscriptions by 25.5%, and maintenance and support increased by 4.2%, supported by a growing installed base. License revenue climbed 21.2%, reflecting continued expansion of integrated and lending solutions. Recurring revenue now represents 64% of SBS’s business (up from 58% in H1 2024), with services accounting for 25% and licenses for 11%. This illustrates SBS’s continued shift from a service-led to a product-led business model.

    Group-wide, Services generated €64.0 million in the first half, or 18.6% of total revenue, down 14.6% compared to last year. This decrease mainly reflects SBS’s repositioning, while Axway’s service contribution remained stable. The difference in service trends between the two businesses stems from their respective models. Axway relies on lighter implementation cycles, whereas SBS delivers more comprehensive banking transformation programs.

    At the end of June 2025, ARR for Axway stood at €255.9 million, reflecting an organic growth of 11.8% year-on-year. SBS also continued to expand its ARR to €233.3 million, up 10.9% organically year-on-year. These solid performances confirm the effectiveness of both companies’ strategic repositioning and reinforce the Group’s revenue predictability and resilience.

    Comments on H1 2025 product line performance

    Axway, a recognized leader in application infrastructure and middleware, delivered solid momentum in the first half of 2025. All product lines contributed to growth, supported by strong commercial execution and increasing demand for cloud-based solutions:

    • Managed File Transfer remained a key contributor despite a normalization of activity following an exceptional 2024. The gradual erosion of legacy maintenance was more than offset by strong momentum in managed deployments, confirming the sustained value of Axway’s hybrid approach.
    • B2B Integration delivered robust gains across the board, benefiting from growing demand for managed solutions and early signs of successful cross-sell with SBS. The product line also saw improvements in both subscription and service revenue.
    • API Management accelerated sharply, supported by strong commercial execution and increased adoption of its integration and engagement modules. The Fusion extension also contributed positively, confirming the platform’s potential.
    • Specialized Products, including the Financial Accounting Hub, maintained steady momentum through targeted compliance and finance use cases. Recent wins via ecosystem partnerships reinforced Axway’s positioning with key accounts.

    SBS, a trusted provider of banking and financing software, posted solid growth in all product lines, confirming the strength of its modular and targeted approach as it continues its shift toward a product-led model:

    • Financing Products maintained a steady trajectory, reflecting stable demand in wholesale auto finance and UK mortgage service. Activity remained resilient despite longer decision cycles in certain regions.
      • Modular Products continued to gain traction, primarily driven by momentum in instant payments and the regulatory reporting platform. Cross-sell into the integrated base gained pace, confirming the appeal of modular architectures.
      • Integrated Products delivered consistent performance, with solid customer retention and ongoing functional improvements. In some markets, modular alternatives are beginning to complement legacy platforms, paving the way for more composable setups. SBS’ market-leading product in Africa continues to perform strongly, adding new customers as well as increasing share of wallet in its installed base.
    • Banking Components continued to gain momentum, particularly in payments, lending, and cards. The strength of customer relationships across key accounts in France continues to drive upsells.

    Comments on H1 2025 profit on operating activities

    Profit on Operating Activities – Group
                       
        H1 2025   H1 2024
    Proforma    		   Change
        €m % of Rev.   €m % of Rev.   €m Basis Points
    Product revenue   280.0 81.4%   248.7 76.8%   + 31.3 + 461
    Services revenue   64.0 18.6%   75.2 23.2%   – 11.2 – 461
    Total revenue   344.0     323.9     + 20.1  
    Total costs of revenue   115.9     117.1     – 1.2  
    GROSS PROFIT   228.1 66.3%   206.9 63.9%   + 21.2 + 243
    o/w product gross profit   217.9 77.8%   191.7 77.0%   + 26.2 + 75
    o/w services gross profit   10.2 15.9%   15.2 20.2%   – 5.0 – 422
    Operating expenses   186.8 54.3%   186.9 57.7%   – 0.1 – 341
    o/w research & development   93.2 27.1%   95.0 29.3%   – 1.8 – 224
    o/w sales & marketing   62.8 18.3%   62.3 19.2%   + 0.5 – 96
    o/w general & administrative   30.8 8.9%   29.6 9.1%   + 1.1 – 20
    PROFIT ON OPERATING ACTIVITIES   41.3 12.0%   19.9 6.1%   + 21.4 + 585
    Net Capitalisation of R&D   8.4 2.4%   9.1 2.8%   – 0.8 – 39
    in % of gross R&D   8.2%     8.8%     -0.5%  

    In H1 2025, profit on operating activities reached €41.3 million, representing a margin of 12.0% of revenue, compared with 6.1% in H1 2024. This sharp improvement reflects strong gross profit expansion, driven by a more favorable revenue mix and tight cost control across operating expenses with all lines showing year-on-year efficiencies. Gross margins increased—particularly at Axway—thanks to strong bookings in customer-managed subscriptions, which generated significant upfront revenue at high margins.

    Comments on H1 2025 net profit

    Net Profit – Group
                       
        Half-year 2025   Half-year 2024
    Proforma
    6M AXW + 6M SBS    		   Half-year 2024
    Reported
    Axway Standalone
        €m % of Rev.   €m % of Rev.   €m % of Rev.
    PROFIT ON OPERATING ACTIVITIES   41.3 12.0%   19.9 6.1%   17.1 11.5%
    Share-based expenses   -6.7     -2.4     -2.9  
    Amortization of allocated intangibles   -6.2     -7.1     -1.7  
    PROFIT FROM RECURRING OPERATIONS   28.4 8.3%   10.5 3.2%   12.5 8.4%
    Other operating income and expenses   -8.9     -7.9     -4.1  
    OPERATING PROFIT   19.5 5.7%   2.6 0.8%   8.3 5.6%
    Cost of financial debt   -9.0     -8.9     -2.7  
    Other financial income and expenses   -2.2     -2.0     -0.9  
    Income tax expenses   -2.5     -7.2     -2.0  
    NET PROFIT   5.8 1.7%   -15.6 -4.8%   2.8 1.9%
    Earnings per share   0.20 €     -0.54 €     0.13 €  

    Profit from recurring operations reached €28.4 million, after accounting for the amortization of allocated intangibles and share-based expenses. This marks a substantial improvement from the H1 2024 proforma figure of €10.5 million.

    Share-based expenses increased, reflecting the inclusion of SBS in the new long-term incentive program, the Group’s strong share price performance, and higher employer social security rates in France. The purchase price allocation (PPA) related to the SBS acquisition has now been finalized. Amortization of allocated intangibles has been restated for 2024 on a pro forma basis and is expected to total €12–13 million for full-year 2025.

    After including other operating income and expenses, such as restructuring charges and non-recurring items totaling €8.9 million, operating profit amounted to €19.5 million, compared with €2.6 million on a proforma basis in H1 2024.

    Net profit for the half-year came to €5.8 million (1.7%), a significant turnaround from the €15.6 million loss recorded on a proforma basis in the prior year.

    Basic earnings per share stood at €0.20, compared with a loss of €0.54 per share in the first half of 2024 (proforma).

    Financial position on June 30, 2025

    74Software made strong progress in its deleveraging effort during H1 2025. Free cash flow was particularly robust, supported by seasonal inflows from maintenance and subscription renewals, as well as the first-time implementation of a factoring program on selected receivables. Unlevered free cash flow reached €76.4 million, enabling €42 million in debt repayments and boosting cash balances. As a result, net debt stood at €191.8 million (before IFRS 16), with a leverage ratio of 1.83x and a gearing ratio of 0.37x—achieving the full-year leverage target of below 2.0x well ahead of schedule. This deleveraging is expected to reduce interest expenses going forward. Due to seasonal patterns in cash collection, the leverage ratio is expected to remain below 2.0x through year-end, though without material further improvement.

    Shareholders’ equity stood at €512.8 million (72.8% of total capital) at June 30, 2025.

    Change in the workforce

    At June 30, 2025, the Group employed 4,679 full-time equivalents, compared with 4,787 at year-end 2024. This 2.6% reduction reflects continued disciplined workforce management across both Axway and SBS, aligned with the Group’s operational efficiency focus.

    Targets & Ambitions

    Following a strong first half, 74Software confirms its full-year 2025 guidance, underpinned by solid execution and front-loaded bookings. The Group continues to target revenue growth between 2% and 4%, reaching approximately €700 million, with an operating margin between 14% and 16%. Due to the first-time introduction of the factoring program, unlevered free cash flow is now expected to be at least 10% of revenue, and the leverage ratio is projected to remain below 2.0x.

    Looking ahead, 74Software reiterates its ambition to surpass €750 million in revenue by 2027 with an operating margin above 17%, and to reach around 20% by 2028 — in line with its trajectory toward a scalable, profitable, and product-led growth model.

    [ NEW TIME ] Today, Thursday, July 24, 2025, 6.00 p.m. (CEST):

    2025 HALF-YEAR RESULTS – VIRTUAL ANALYST CONFERENCE

    •  Register here or join by phone by dialing one of the numbers below:
      • France: +33 (0) 1 70 37 71 66 / USA: +1 786 697 3501 / International: +44 (0) 33 0551 0200

    Please note that the meeting will be held in English.

    Financial Calendar

    Thursday, October 30, 2025, before market opening: Publication of Q3 2025 Revenue

    Thursday, February 26, 2026, after market closing: Publication of 2025 Full-Year Results

    Glossary and Alternative Performance Measures

    Axway ARR: Annual Recurring Revenue – Expected annual billing amounts from all active maintenance and subscription agreements.

    SBS ARR: Annual Recurring Revenue – Monthly recurring revenue (MRR) for the last month of the reporting period multiplied by 12. Where contracts are affected by seasonality or contracted volume-based elements, the last 12 months of revenue are aggregated in determining ARR. Expected recurring revenue from contracts signed but not yet active are not included in ARR.

    NPS: Net Promoter Score – Customer satisfaction and recommendation indicator for a company.

    Organic growth: Growth in revenue between the period under review and the prior period, restated for consolidation scope and exchange rate impacts.

    Profit on operating activities: Profit from recurring operations adjusted for the non-cash share-based payment expense, as well as the amortization of allocated intangible assets.

    Proforma: Proforma measures assume the acquisition of SBS happened at the beginning of the respective reporting period.

    Restated revenue: Revenue for the prior year, adjusted for the consolidation scope and exchange rates of the current year.

    Unlevered free cash flow: Free cash flow before exceptional items and before net interest expense.

    About 74Software

    74Software is an enterprise software group founded through the combination of Axway and SBS – independently operated leaders with unique experience and capabilities to deliver mission-critical software for a data driven world. A pioneer in enterprise integration solutions for 25 years, Axway supports major brands and government agencies around the globe with its core line of MFT, B2B, API, and Financial Accounting Hub products. SBS empowers banks and financial institutions to reimagine tomorrow’s digital experiences with a composable cloud-based architecture that enables deposits, lending, compliance, payments, consumer, and asset finance services and operations to be deployed worldwide. 74Software serves more than 11,000 companies, including over 1,500 financial service customers. To learn more, visit 74Software.com

    Contacts – Investor Relations:

    Arthur Carli – +33 (0)1 47 17 24 65 – acarli@74software.com

    Chloé Chouard – +33 (0)1 47 17 21 78 – cchouard@74software.com

    Appendices (1/5)

    Income Statement – Group
                       
        Half-year 2025   Half-year 2024
    Proforma
    6M AXW + 6M SBS    		   Half-year 2024
    Reported
    Axway Standalone
        €m % of Rev.   €m % of Rev.   €m % of Rev.
    TOTAL REVENUE   344.0     323.9     148.7  
    Total costs of revenue   -115.9     -117.1     -44.0  
    GROSS PROFIT   228.1 66.3%   206.9 63.9%   104.7 70.5%
    Operating expenses   -186.8     -186.9     -87.6  
    PROFIT ON OPERATING ACTIVITIES   41.3 12.0%   19.9 6.1%   17.1 11.5%
    Share-based expenses   -6.7     -2.4     -2.9  
    Amortization of allocated intangibles   -6.2     -7.1     -1.7  
    PROFIT FROM RECURRING OPERATIONS   28.4 8.3%   10.5 3.2%   12.5 8.4%
    Other operating income and expenses   -8.9     -7.9     -4.1  
    OPERATING PROFIT   19.5 5.7%   2.6 0.8%   8.3 5.6%
    Cost of financial debt   -9.0     -8.9     -2.7  
    Other financial income and expenses   -2.2     -2.0     -0.9  
    Income tax expenses   -2.5     -7.2     -2.0  
    NET PROFIT   5.8 1.7%   -15.6 -4.8%   2.8 1.9%
    Earnings per share   0.20 €     -0.54 €     0.13 €  
    Simplified Balance Sheet                    
                         
    in €m   H1 2025
    IFRS
    Consolidated    		 FY 2024
    IFRS Consolidated    		 Change   in €m   H1 2025
    IFRS
    Consolidated    		 FY 2024
    IFRS Consolidated    		 Change
    Accounts receivables   246.7 293.5 – 46.8   Cash & cash equivalents   -57.8 -41.4 – 16.4
    Other current assets   123.3 101.9 + 21.4   Financial debt   249.6 291.8 – 42.2
    Accounts payables   -34.1 -28.7 – 5.4   Net debt   191.8 250.4 – 58.6
    Deferred revenue   -138.2 -88.6 – 49.6   Equity   512.8 532.4 – 19.6
    Other current liabilities   -137.2 -158.0 + 20.8   CAPITAL EMPLOYED   704.6 782.8 – 78.2
    Net working capital   60.5 120.1 – 59.7            
    Tangible fixed assets   20.9 25.0 – 4.1            
    Goodwill   523.1 497.4 + 25.7       H1 2025
    IFRS
    Consolidated    		 FY 2024
    IFRS Consolidated    		 Change
    Other intangibles   132.1 192.3 – 60.2      
    Fixed assets   676.1 714.7 – 38.6   Ratios  
    Other assets   100.2 78.1 + 22.1   DSO (days)   121 145 -24
    Other liabilities   -132.1 -130.1 – 2.0   Net debt / total capital   27.2% 32.0% – 4.8%
    Other assets – liabilities   -31.9 -52.0 + 20.1   Equity / total capital   72.8% 68.0% + 4.8%
    INVESTED ASSETS   704.5 782.8 – 78.4            
    Cash Flow Statement              
                   
      H1 2025   H1 2024   Change Axway
    H1 25 vs. H1 24
    in €m 74Software SBS Axway   Axway Standalone  
    Operating cashflow 89.6 35.8 53.9   15.0   + 38.8
    o/w change in NWC 55.0 29.4 25.6   2.6   + 23.1
    o/w other operating cashflow 34.6 6.4 28.2   12.5   + 15.7
    Investing cashflow -14.2 -9.8 -4.4   -2.7   – 1.6
    o/w PP&E & others -5.0 -0.6 -4.4   -2.7   – 1.7
    o/w capitalized R&D -9.2 -9.2 0.0   0.0   0.0
    Financing cashflow -58.1 -14.6 -43.4   -12.6   – 30.8
    o/w debt repayment -42.0 0.0 -42.0   0.0   – 42.0
    o/w other financing cashflow -16.1 -14.6 -1.4   -12.6   + 11.2
    NET CHANGE IN CASH 16.2 11.1 5.1   -0.2   + 5.3
                   
    Unlevered free cashflow 76.4 29.0 47.4   13.9   + 33.5
    as a % of revenue 22.2% 15.7% 29.5%   9.4%   + 20.1%

    Appendices (2/5)

    Profit on Operating Activities – Axway
                       
        H1 2025
    Axway    		   H1 2024
    Reported
    Axway    		   Change
        €m % of Rev.   €m % of Rev.   €m Basis Points
    Product revenue   143.3 89.1%   130.5 87.8%   + 12.8 + 134
    Services revenue   17.5 10.9%   18.2 12.2%   – 0.7 – 134
    Total revenue   160.8     148.7     + 12.1  
    Total costs of revenue   40.3     44.0     – 3.7  
    GROSS PROFIT   120.5 74.9%   104.7 70.4%   + 15.8 + 451
    o/w product gross profit   119.3 83.2%   104.6 80.2%   + 14.7 + 308
    o/w services gross profit   1.2 7.0%   0.1 0.6%   + 1.1 + 644
    Operating expenses   93.8 58.4%   87.6 58.9%   + 6.2 – 58
    o/w research & development   32.6 20.3%   31.2 21.0%   + 1.4 – 69
    o/w sales & marketing   43.0 26.8%   41.8 28.1%   + 1.2 – 137
    o/w general & administrative   18.2 11.3%   14.6 9.8%   + 3.6 + 148
    PROFIT ON OPERATING ACTIVITIES   26.7 16.6%   17.1 11.5%   + 9.6 + 508
    Profit on Operating Activities – SBS
                       
        H1 2025
    SBS    		   H1 2024
    Proforma
    SBS    		   Change
        €m % of Rev.   €m % of Rev.   €m Basis Points
    Product revenue   137.7 74.8%   118.2 67.5%   + 19.5 + 729
    Services revenue   46.5 25.2%   57.0 32.5%   – 10.5 – 729
    Total revenue   184.2     175.2     + 8.9  
    Total costs of revenue   76.6     73.1     + 3.5  
    GROSS PROFIT   107.6 58.4%   102.1 58.3%   + 5.5 + 14
    o/w product gross profit   98.6 71.6%   87.1 73.6%   + 11.5 – 202
    o/w services gross profit   9.0 19.3%   15.1 26.4%   – 6.1 – 710
    Operating expenses   93.0 50.5%   99.3 56.7%   – 6.3 – 619
    o/w research & development   60.6 32.9%   63.8 36.4%   – 3.3 – 354
    o/w sales & marketing   19.8 10.7%   20.5 11.7%   – 0.7 – 93
    o/w general & administrative   12.6 6.8%   15.0 8.6%   – 2.4 – 173
    PROFIT ON OPERATING ACTIVITIES   14.6 7.9%   2.8 1.6%   + 11.8 + 633
    Quarterly Revenue Breakdown by Portfolio Brand
                 
        Q1 2025   Q2 2025   H1 2025
    €m      
    Axway Scope   82.5   78.3   160.8
    SBS Scope   88.3   95.8   184.2
                 
    Consolidation   -0.4   -0.6   -1.0
                 
    74Software   170.4   173.5   344.0

    Appendices (3/5)

    Quarterly Revenue Breakdown by Type
                 
        Q1 2025   Q2 2025   H1 2025
    €m / %      
    Product revenue   139.1   141.0   280.0
    Recurring revenue   129.5   128.4   258.0
    o/w Maintenance & Support   47.0   44.5   91.5
    o/w Customer-managed Subscription   48.6   50.1   98.7
    o/w Own-managed Subscription   34.0   33.8   67.8
    License revenue   9.5   12.5   22.1
                 
    Services revenue   31.3   32.6   64.0
                 
    Total revenue   170.4   173.6   344.0
    Quarterly Revenue Breakdown by Type – Axway
                 
        Q1 2025   Q2 2025   H1 2025
    €m / %      
    Product revenue   73.4   69.8   143.3
    Recurring revenue   72.1   69.5   141.6
    o/w Maintenance & Support   14.4   12.8   27.2
    o/w Customer-managed Subscription   43.7   43.2   87.0
    o/w Own-managed Subscription   13.9   13.4   27.4
    License revenue   1.3   0.4   1.7
                 
    Services revenue   9.0   8.5   17.5
                 
    Total revenue – Axway   82.5   78.3   160.8
    Quarterly Revenue Breakdown by Type – SBS
                 
        Q1 2025   Q2 2025   H1 2025
    €m / %      
    Product revenue   66.0   71.7   137.7
    Recurring revenue   57.9   59.5   117.3
    o/w Maintenance & Support   32.5   31.7   64.2
    o/w Customer-managed Subscription   4.9   6.9   11.7
    o/w Own-managed Subscription   20.5   20.9   41.4
    License revenue   8.2   12.2   20.4
                 
    Services revenue   22.3   24.2   46.5
                 
    Total revenue SBS   88.3   95.8   184.2

    Appendices (4/5)

    Half-year Revenue Breakdown by Portfolio Brand & Type      
                     
        H1 2025
    Axway    		   H1 2025
    SBS    		   H1 2025
    Consolidation    		   H1 2025
    74Software
    €m / %        
    Product revenue   143.3   137.7   -1.0   280.0
    Recurring revenue   141.6   117.3   -1.0   258.0
    o/w Maintenance & Support   27.2   64.2   0.0   91.5
    o/w Customer-managed Subscription   87.0   11.7   0.0   98.7
    o/w Own-managed Subscription   27.4   41.4   -1.0   67.8
    License revenue   1.7   20.4   0.0   22.1
                     
    Services revenue   17.5   46.5   0.0   64.0
                     
    Total revenue   160.8   184.2   -1.0   344.0
    Half-year Revenue Breakdown by Portfolio Brand & Type      
                     
        H1 2024
    Axway    		   H1 2024 Proforma
    SBS    		   H1 2024 Proforma Consolidation   H1 2024 Proforma 74Software
    €m / %        
    Product revenue   130.5   118.2   0.0   248.7
    Recurring revenue   127.9   101.4   0.0   229.3
    o/w Maintenance & Support   34.6   61.6   0.0   96.2
    o/w Customer-managed Subscription   67.3   9.3   0.0   76.6
    o/w Own-managed Subscription   25.9   30.5   0.0   56.5
    License revenue   2.6   16.8   0.0   19.4
                     
    Services revenue   18.2   57.0   0.0   75.2
                     
    Total revenue   148.7   175.2   0.0   323.9
    Half-year Revenue Breakdown by Region
                 
      H1 2025 H1 2024
    Proforma    		 H1 2024
    Restated    		 Total
    Growth    		 Organic
    Growth
     
      €m % of Rev.
    Europe 208.1 60.5% 203.0 203.2 2.5% 2.4%
    o/w France 99.5 28.9% 99.7 99.7 -0.2% -0.2%
    o/w UK 46.7 13.6% 44.8 45.0 4.3% 3.7%
    Americas 73.3 21.3% 65.6 64.6 11.7% 13.5%
    Middle East & Africa 43.1 12.5% 39.3 39.3 9.7% 9.7%
    Asia & Pacific 19.4 5.7% 15.9 15.8 22.0% 22.7%
                 
    74Software 344.0   323.9 323.0 6.2% 6.5%

    Appendices (5/5)

    Headcount
           
      30/06/2025 31/12/2024 Change
    Europe 3.001 3.090 -89
    Americas 370 378 -8
    Asia – Pacific 869 882 -13
    Middle East – Africa 439 437 2
           
    TOTAL 4.679 4.787 -108
    Impact on Half-year Revenue of Changes in Scope and Exchange Rates
           
    €m / % H1 2025 H1 2024 Growth
    Revenue 344.0 148.7 + 131.4%
    Changes in exchange rates   -0.9  
    Revenue at constant exchange rates 344.0 147.7 + 132.8%
    Changes in scope   +175.2  
    Revenue at constant scope and exchange rates 344.0 323.0 + 6.5%
    Changes in Main Exchange Rates
           
    For 1€ Average Rate
    H1 2025    		 Average rate
    H1 2024    		 Change
    US Dollar 1.093 1.081 – 1.1%
    Great Britain Pound 0.842 0.855 + 1.5%

    1 The interim consolidated financial statements were subject to limited review procedures.

    Attachment

    The MIL Network –

  • MIL-OSI: 74Software: Sustained Momentum Reinforces Long-Term Objectives

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Press Release
    Paris, July 24, 2025

    74Software: Sustained Momentum Reinforces Long-Term Objectives

    • Group H1 2025 revenue of €344.0m, up 6.5% organically and 6.2% in total
    • Strong H1 across both brands – Axway up 8.9% to €160.8m and SBS up 5.0% to €184.2m
    • Marked improvement in margin on operating activities, up 585bps to 12.0% of revenue (€41.3m)
    • ARR increased year-on-year by 11.8% at Axway and 10.9% at SBS, further strengthening recurring revenues

    74Software’s Board of Directors, chaired by Pierre Pasquier, approved today the financial statements for the first half of 2025, which were subject to a limited review by the statutory auditors1. Consequently, 74Software announces:

    Half-Year Key Income Statement Items
                       
        Half-year 2025   Half-year 2024
    Proforma
    6M AXW + 6M SBS    		   Half-year 2024
    Reported
    Axway Standalone
        €m % of Rev.   €m % of Rev.   €m % of Rev.
    TOTAL REVENUE   344.0     323.9     148.7  
    GROSS PROFIT   228.1 66.3%   206.8 63.9%   104.7 70.5%
    PROFIT ON OPERATING ACTIVITIES   41.3 12.0%   19.9 6.1%   17.1 11.5%
    OPERATING PROFIT   19.5 5.7%   2.6 0.8%   8.3 5.6%
    NET PROFIT   5.8 1.7%   -15.6 -4.8%   2.8 1.9%
    EARNINGS PER SHARE   0.20 €     -0.54 €     0.13 €  

    Patrick Donovan, Chief Executive Officer, stated:

    “Our H1 results confirm our strong start to the year and demonstrate both the strength of our strategic direction and our ability to execute in-line with our stated plans. As noted in our Q1 press release, the solid early execution front-loads part of the year’s commercial activity— especially in the Axway business. We remain fully committed to our full-year guidance and, more broadly, to our 2027 and 2028 ambitions. Axway is now firmly established as a subscription-first business, while SBS is rapidly scaling its modular banking platforms and expanding its SaaS footprint. With recurring revenue accelerating and capital deployment tightly managed, 74Software is becoming a more structured, resilient, and forward-looking group — built to deliver long-term value creation.”

    Comments on H1 2025 activity

    74Software delivered a strong first-half performance, confirming its ability to execute on its strategic roadmap and capitalize on the operational integration initiated following the transaction closing in September 2024. Revenue growth was solid in both brands, while profitability improved as planned — reflecting the strength of the Group’s model and the improved execution driven by Axway’s infrastructure software expertise and SBS’s leadership in banking software.

    Following a particularly dynamic Q1, the second quarter allowed the Group to consolidate its gains, maintain commercial selectivity, and further shift toward a recurring, scalable revenue model. Axway has now largely transitioned, while SBS continues to advance its own transformation, expanding SaaS deployments and rebalancing its revenue mix in favor of product revenue. Key highlights for the period include:

    • Axway recorded a strong first half, with consistent growth across all product lines. Nearly 60 new customers were signed during the period (+20% year-on-year), with new-name deals accounting for around one-third of Q2 bookings. Large-scale projects gained momentum, including six contracts exceeding €1 million signed in Q2 alone. Demand for cloud-based delivery continued to rise, with Axway-managed deployments representing 40% of Q2 bookings and 35% over the first half. This shift was broad-based, with steady adoption across all geographies and industry verticals.
    • SBS also reported strong results, with product revenue now accounting for 75% of total revenue, up from 67% in H1 2024 — marking significant progress in the company’s shift toward a software-led model. Growth was supported by all product lines, including solid license activity in integrated platforms, components, and financing solutions, as well as continued expansion of modular offerings. The company has now contracted more than 230 SaaS regulatory reporting services, reinforcing adoption across its client base. During the period, SBS welcomed several new clients and completed the first SaaS deployment of its digital engagement platform in Europe. Two additional implementations are scheduled for the third quarter in Africa, where demand is driven by microfinance and Islamic banking. The company’s progress was also recognized through multiple industry awards highlighting its leadership in compliance, payments, and digital banking.

    The Group enters H2 with improving visibility, disciplined execution, and a clear focus on delivering its full-year objectives. Integration of support functions between Axway and SBS is now largely complete, and joint commercial initiatives are steadily expanding across selected regions.

    Comments on H1 2025 operational performance

    Half-year Revenue Breakdown by Portfolio Brand
               
      H1 2025 H1 2024
    Proforma    		 H1 2024
    Restated    		 Total
    Growth    		 Organic
    Growth
    €m / %
    Axway Scope 160.8 148.7 147.6 8.1% 8.9%
    SBS Scope 184.2 175.2 175.4 5.1% 5.0%
               
    Consolidation -1.0 0.0 0.0 – –
               
    74Software 344.0 323.9 323.0 6.2% 6.5%

    In the first half of 2025, the Group generated revenue of €344.0 million, reflecting total growth of 6.2% and organic growth of 6.5% year-on-year. This performance was supported by both brands, with Axway contributing €160.8 million in revenue and organic growth of 8.9%, and SBS contributing €184.2 million with 5.0% organic growth (compared to proforma H1 2024).

    Half-year Revenue Breakdown by Type
               
      H1 2025 H1 2024
    Proforma    		 H1 2024
    Restated    		 Total
    Growth    		 Organic
    Growth
    €m / %
    Product revenue 280.0 248.7 248.1 12.6% 12.9%
    Recurring revenue 258.0 229.3 228.7 12.5% 12.8%
    o/w Maintenance & Support 91.5 96.2 96.0 -4.9% -4.7%
    o/w Customer-managed Subscription 98.7 76.6 76.5 28.8% 29.0%
    o/w Own-managed Subscription 67.8 56.5 56.2 20.0% 20.6%
    License revenue 22.1 19.4 19.4 13.5% 13.7%
               
    Services revenue 64.0 75.2 74.9 -14.9% -14.6%
               
    Total revenue 344.0 323.9 323.0 6.2% 6.5%

    In the first half of 2025, Product revenue reached €280.0 million, up 12.9% organically, reflecting strong execution across both Axway and SBS. The Group continued to benefit from rising demand for subscription-based offers, with both customer-managed and own-managed subscriptions posting growth above 20%. Maintenance revenue declined as anticipated, while license activity increased but remained low at 6.4% of total revenue. Product revenues accounted for 81% of total revenue (up from 77% in H1 2024) and recurring revenues were at 75% of total revenue (up from 71% in H1 2024), confirming 74Software’s successful transition toward a product- and subscription-led model.

    Axway generated €143.3 million in product revenue, up 10.5% organically. Recurring activities made nearly the entire contribution, driven by a 29.5% increase in customer-managed subscriptions and 6.8% growth in own-managed deployments, reflecting continued momentum in hybrid environments. License revenue decreased by 34.9% as the company continues to phase out new license sales. Maintenance and support dropped by 20.6% due to the continued shift of the customer base towards subscription models. Services revenue was slightly lower, down 2.2%, and represented 11% of Axway’s total.

    SBS recorded €137.7 million in product revenue, up 16.3% organically, with strong performance across all product categories. Own-managed subscriptions rose by 35.2%, customer-managed subscriptions by 25.5%, and maintenance and support increased by 4.2%, supported by a growing installed base. License revenue climbed 21.2%, reflecting continued expansion of integrated and lending solutions. Recurring revenue now represents 64% of SBS’s business (up from 58% in H1 2024), with services accounting for 25% and licenses for 11%. This illustrates SBS’s continued shift from a service-led to a product-led business model.

    Group-wide, Services generated €64.0 million in the first half, or 18.6% of total revenue, down 14.6% compared to last year. This decrease mainly reflects SBS’s repositioning, while Axway’s service contribution remained stable. The difference in service trends between the two businesses stems from their respective models. Axway relies on lighter implementation cycles, whereas SBS delivers more comprehensive banking transformation programs.

    At the end of June 2025, ARR for Axway stood at €255.9 million, reflecting an organic growth of 11.8% year-on-year. SBS also continued to expand its ARR to €233.3 million, up 10.9% organically year-on-year. These solid performances confirm the effectiveness of both companies’ strategic repositioning and reinforce the Group’s revenue predictability and resilience.

    Comments on H1 2025 product line performance

    Axway, a recognized leader in application infrastructure and middleware, delivered solid momentum in the first half of 2025. All product lines contributed to growth, supported by strong commercial execution and increasing demand for cloud-based solutions:

    • Managed File Transfer remained a key contributor despite a normalization of activity following an exceptional 2024. The gradual erosion of legacy maintenance was more than offset by strong momentum in managed deployments, confirming the sustained value of Axway’s hybrid approach.
    • B2B Integration delivered robust gains across the board, benefiting from growing demand for managed solutions and early signs of successful cross-sell with SBS. The product line also saw improvements in both subscription and service revenue.
    • API Management accelerated sharply, supported by strong commercial execution and increased adoption of its integration and engagement modules. The Fusion extension also contributed positively, confirming the platform’s potential.
    • Specialized Products, including the Financial Accounting Hub, maintained steady momentum through targeted compliance and finance use cases. Recent wins via ecosystem partnerships reinforced Axway’s positioning with key accounts.

    SBS, a trusted provider of banking and financing software, posted solid growth in all product lines, confirming the strength of its modular and targeted approach as it continues its shift toward a product-led model:

    • Financing Products maintained a steady trajectory, reflecting stable demand in wholesale auto finance and UK mortgage service. Activity remained resilient despite longer decision cycles in certain regions.
      • Modular Products continued to gain traction, primarily driven by momentum in instant payments and the regulatory reporting platform. Cross-sell into the integrated base gained pace, confirming the appeal of modular architectures.
      • Integrated Products delivered consistent performance, with solid customer retention and ongoing functional improvements. In some markets, modular alternatives are beginning to complement legacy platforms, paving the way for more composable setups. SBS’ market-leading product in Africa continues to perform strongly, adding new customers as well as increasing share of wallet in its installed base.
    • Banking Components continued to gain momentum, particularly in payments, lending, and cards. The strength of customer relationships across key accounts in France continues to drive upsells.

    Comments on H1 2025 profit on operating activities

    Profit on Operating Activities – Group
                       
        H1 2025   H1 2024
    Proforma    		   Change
        €m % of Rev.   €m % of Rev.   €m Basis Points
    Product revenue   280.0 81.4%   248.7 76.8%   + 31.3 + 461
    Services revenue   64.0 18.6%   75.2 23.2%   – 11.2 – 461
    Total revenue   344.0     323.9     + 20.1  
    Total costs of revenue   115.9     117.1     – 1.2  
    GROSS PROFIT   228.1 66.3%   206.9 63.9%   + 21.2 + 243
    o/w product gross profit   217.9 77.8%   191.7 77.0%   + 26.2 + 75
    o/w services gross profit   10.2 15.9%   15.2 20.2%   – 5.0 – 422
    Operating expenses   186.8 54.3%   186.9 57.7%   – 0.1 – 341
    o/w research & development   93.2 27.1%   95.0 29.3%   – 1.8 – 224
    o/w sales & marketing   62.8 18.3%   62.3 19.2%   + 0.5 – 96
    o/w general & administrative   30.8 8.9%   29.6 9.1%   + 1.1 – 20
    PROFIT ON OPERATING ACTIVITIES   41.3 12.0%   19.9 6.1%   + 21.4 + 585
    Net Capitalisation of R&D   8.4 2.4%   9.1 2.8%   – 0.8 – 39
    in % of gross R&D   8.2%     8.8%     -0.5%  

    In H1 2025, profit on operating activities reached €41.3 million, representing a margin of 12.0% of revenue, compared with 6.1% in H1 2024. This sharp improvement reflects strong gross profit expansion, driven by a more favorable revenue mix and tight cost control across operating expenses with all lines showing year-on-year efficiencies. Gross margins increased—particularly at Axway—thanks to strong bookings in customer-managed subscriptions, which generated significant upfront revenue at high margins.

    Comments on H1 2025 net profit

    Net Profit – Group
                       
        Half-year 2025   Half-year 2024
    Proforma
    6M AXW + 6M SBS    		   Half-year 2024
    Reported
    Axway Standalone
        €m % of Rev.   €m % of Rev.   €m % of Rev.
    PROFIT ON OPERATING ACTIVITIES   41.3 12.0%   19.9 6.1%   17.1 11.5%
    Share-based expenses   -6.7     -2.4     -2.9  
    Amortization of allocated intangibles   -6.2     -7.1     -1.7  
    PROFIT FROM RECURRING OPERATIONS   28.4 8.3%   10.5 3.2%   12.5 8.4%
    Other operating income and expenses   -8.9     -7.9     -4.1  
    OPERATING PROFIT   19.5 5.7%   2.6 0.8%   8.3 5.6%
    Cost of financial debt   -9.0     -8.9     -2.7  
    Other financial income and expenses   -2.2     -2.0     -0.9  
    Income tax expenses   -2.5     -7.2     -2.0  
    NET PROFIT   5.8 1.7%   -15.6 -4.8%   2.8 1.9%
    Earnings per share   0.20 €     -0.54 €     0.13 €  

    Profit from recurring operations reached €28.4 million, after accounting for the amortization of allocated intangibles and share-based expenses. This marks a substantial improvement from the H1 2024 proforma figure of €10.5 million.

    Share-based expenses increased, reflecting the inclusion of SBS in the new long-term incentive program, the Group’s strong share price performance, and higher employer social security rates in France. The purchase price allocation (PPA) related to the SBS acquisition has now been finalized. Amortization of allocated intangibles has been restated for 2024 on a pro forma basis and is expected to total €12–13 million for full-year 2025.

    After including other operating income and expenses, such as restructuring charges and non-recurring items totaling €8.9 million, operating profit amounted to €19.5 million, compared with €2.6 million on a proforma basis in H1 2024.

    Net profit for the half-year came to €5.8 million (1.7%), a significant turnaround from the €15.6 million loss recorded on a proforma basis in the prior year.

    Basic earnings per share stood at €0.20, compared with a loss of €0.54 per share in the first half of 2024 (proforma).

    Financial position on June 30, 2025

    74Software made strong progress in its deleveraging effort during H1 2025. Free cash flow was particularly robust, supported by seasonal inflows from maintenance and subscription renewals, as well as the first-time implementation of a factoring program on selected receivables. Unlevered free cash flow reached €76.4 million, enabling €42 million in debt repayments and boosting cash balances. As a result, net debt stood at €191.8 million (before IFRS 16), with a leverage ratio of 1.83x and a gearing ratio of 0.37x—achieving the full-year leverage target of below 2.0x well ahead of schedule. This deleveraging is expected to reduce interest expenses going forward. Due to seasonal patterns in cash collection, the leverage ratio is expected to remain below 2.0x through year-end, though without material further improvement.

    Shareholders’ equity stood at €512.8 million (72.8% of total capital) at June 30, 2025.

    Change in the workforce

    At June 30, 2025, the Group employed 4,679 full-time equivalents, compared with 4,787 at year-end 2024. This 2.6% reduction reflects continued disciplined workforce management across both Axway and SBS, aligned with the Group’s operational efficiency focus.

    Targets & Ambitions

    Following a strong first half, 74Software confirms its full-year 2025 guidance, underpinned by solid execution and front-loaded bookings. The Group continues to target revenue growth between 2% and 4%, reaching approximately €700 million, with an operating margin between 14% and 16%. Due to the first-time introduction of the factoring program, unlevered free cash flow is now expected to be at least 10% of revenue, and the leverage ratio is projected to remain below 2.0x.

    Looking ahead, 74Software reiterates its ambition to surpass €750 million in revenue by 2027 with an operating margin above 17%, and to reach around 20% by 2028 — in line with its trajectory toward a scalable, profitable, and product-led growth model.

    [ NEW TIME ] Today, Thursday, July 24, 2025, 6.00 p.m. (CEST):

    2025 HALF-YEAR RESULTS – VIRTUAL ANALYST CONFERENCE

    •  Register here or join by phone by dialing one of the numbers below:
      • France: +33 (0) 1 70 37 71 66 / USA: +1 786 697 3501 / International: +44 (0) 33 0551 0200

    Please note that the meeting will be held in English.

    Financial Calendar

    Thursday, October 30, 2025, before market opening: Publication of Q3 2025 Revenue

    Thursday, February 26, 2026, after market closing: Publication of 2025 Full-Year Results

    Glossary and Alternative Performance Measures

    Axway ARR: Annual Recurring Revenue – Expected annual billing amounts from all active maintenance and subscription agreements.

    SBS ARR: Annual Recurring Revenue – Monthly recurring revenue (MRR) for the last month of the reporting period multiplied by 12. Where contracts are affected by seasonality or contracted volume-based elements, the last 12 months of revenue are aggregated in determining ARR. Expected recurring revenue from contracts signed but not yet active are not included in ARR.

    NPS: Net Promoter Score – Customer satisfaction and recommendation indicator for a company.

    Organic growth: Growth in revenue between the period under review and the prior period, restated for consolidation scope and exchange rate impacts.

    Profit on operating activities: Profit from recurring operations adjusted for the non-cash share-based payment expense, as well as the amortization of allocated intangible assets.

    Proforma: Proforma measures assume the acquisition of SBS happened at the beginning of the respective reporting period.

    Restated revenue: Revenue for the prior year, adjusted for the consolidation scope and exchange rates of the current year.

    Unlevered free cash flow: Free cash flow before exceptional items and before net interest expense.

    About 74Software

    74Software is an enterprise software group founded through the combination of Axway and SBS – independently operated leaders with unique experience and capabilities to deliver mission-critical software for a data driven world. A pioneer in enterprise integration solutions for 25 years, Axway supports major brands and government agencies around the globe with its core line of MFT, B2B, API, and Financial Accounting Hub products. SBS empowers banks and financial institutions to reimagine tomorrow’s digital experiences with a composable cloud-based architecture that enables deposits, lending, compliance, payments, consumer, and asset finance services and operations to be deployed worldwide. 74Software serves more than 11,000 companies, including over 1,500 financial service customers. To learn more, visit 74Software.com

    Contacts – Investor Relations:

    Arthur Carli – +33 (0)1 47 17 24 65 – acarli@74software.com

    Chloé Chouard – +33 (0)1 47 17 21 78 – cchouard@74software.com

    Appendices (1/5)

    Income Statement – Group
                       
        Half-year 2025   Half-year 2024
    Proforma
    6M AXW + 6M SBS    		   Half-year 2024
    Reported
    Axway Standalone
        €m % of Rev.   €m % of Rev.   €m % of Rev.
    TOTAL REVENUE   344.0     323.9     148.7  
    Total costs of revenue   -115.9     -117.1     -44.0  
    GROSS PROFIT   228.1 66.3%   206.9 63.9%   104.7 70.5%
    Operating expenses   -186.8     -186.9     -87.6  
    PROFIT ON OPERATING ACTIVITIES   41.3 12.0%   19.9 6.1%   17.1 11.5%
    Share-based expenses   -6.7     -2.4     -2.9  
    Amortization of allocated intangibles   -6.2     -7.1     -1.7  
    PROFIT FROM RECURRING OPERATIONS   28.4 8.3%   10.5 3.2%   12.5 8.4%
    Other operating income and expenses   -8.9     -7.9     -4.1  
    OPERATING PROFIT   19.5 5.7%   2.6 0.8%   8.3 5.6%
    Cost of financial debt   -9.0     -8.9     -2.7  
    Other financial income and expenses   -2.2     -2.0     -0.9  
    Income tax expenses   -2.5     -7.2     -2.0  
    NET PROFIT   5.8 1.7%   -15.6 -4.8%   2.8 1.9%
    Earnings per share   0.20 €     -0.54 €     0.13 €  
    Simplified Balance Sheet                    
                         
    in €m   H1 2025
    IFRS
    Consolidated    		 FY 2024
    IFRS Consolidated    		 Change   in €m   H1 2025
    IFRS
    Consolidated    		 FY 2024
    IFRS Consolidated    		 Change
    Accounts receivables   246.7 293.5 – 46.8   Cash & cash equivalents   -57.8 -41.4 – 16.4
    Other current assets   123.3 101.9 + 21.4   Financial debt   249.6 291.8 – 42.2
    Accounts payables   -34.1 -28.7 – 5.4   Net debt   191.8 250.4 – 58.6
    Deferred revenue   -138.2 -88.6 – 49.6   Equity   512.8 532.4 – 19.6
    Other current liabilities   -137.2 -158.0 + 20.8   CAPITAL EMPLOYED   704.6 782.8 – 78.2
    Net working capital   60.5 120.1 – 59.7            
    Tangible fixed assets   20.9 25.0 – 4.1            
    Goodwill   523.1 497.4 + 25.7       H1 2025
    IFRS
    Consolidated    		 FY 2024
    IFRS Consolidated    		 Change
    Other intangibles   132.1 192.3 – 60.2      
    Fixed assets   676.1 714.7 – 38.6   Ratios  
    Other assets   100.2 78.1 + 22.1   DSO (days)   121 145 -24
    Other liabilities   -132.1 -130.1 – 2.0   Net debt / total capital   27.2% 32.0% – 4.8%
    Other assets – liabilities   -31.9 -52.0 + 20.1   Equity / total capital   72.8% 68.0% + 4.8%
    INVESTED ASSETS   704.5 782.8 – 78.4            
    Cash Flow Statement              
                   
      H1 2025   H1 2024   Change Axway
    H1 25 vs. H1 24
    in €m 74Software SBS Axway   Axway Standalone  
    Operating cashflow 89.6 35.8 53.9   15.0   + 38.8
    o/w change in NWC 55.0 29.4 25.6   2.6   + 23.1
    o/w other operating cashflow 34.6 6.4 28.2   12.5   + 15.7
    Investing cashflow -14.2 -9.8 -4.4   -2.7   – 1.6
    o/w PP&E & others -5.0 -0.6 -4.4   -2.7   – 1.7
    o/w capitalized R&D -9.2 -9.2 0.0   0.0   0.0
    Financing cashflow -58.1 -14.6 -43.4   -12.6   – 30.8
    o/w debt repayment -42.0 0.0 -42.0   0.0   – 42.0
    o/w other financing cashflow -16.1 -14.6 -1.4   -12.6   + 11.2
    NET CHANGE IN CASH 16.2 11.1 5.1   -0.2   + 5.3
                   
    Unlevered free cashflow 76.4 29.0 47.4   13.9   + 33.5
    as a % of revenue 22.2% 15.7% 29.5%   9.4%   + 20.1%

    Appendices (2/5)

    Profit on Operating Activities – Axway
                       
        H1 2025
    Axway    		   H1 2024
    Reported
    Axway    		   Change
        €m % of Rev.   €m % of Rev.   €m Basis Points
    Product revenue   143.3 89.1%   130.5 87.8%   + 12.8 + 134
    Services revenue   17.5 10.9%   18.2 12.2%   – 0.7 – 134
    Total revenue   160.8     148.7     + 12.1  
    Total costs of revenue   40.3     44.0     – 3.7  
    GROSS PROFIT   120.5 74.9%   104.7 70.4%   + 15.8 + 451
    o/w product gross profit   119.3 83.2%   104.6 80.2%   + 14.7 + 308
    o/w services gross profit   1.2 7.0%   0.1 0.6%   + 1.1 + 644
    Operating expenses   93.8 58.4%   87.6 58.9%   + 6.2 – 58
    o/w research & development   32.6 20.3%   31.2 21.0%   + 1.4 – 69
    o/w sales & marketing   43.0 26.8%   41.8 28.1%   + 1.2 – 137
    o/w general & administrative   18.2 11.3%   14.6 9.8%   + 3.6 + 148
    PROFIT ON OPERATING ACTIVITIES   26.7 16.6%   17.1 11.5%   + 9.6 + 508
    Profit on Operating Activities – SBS
                       
        H1 2025
    SBS    		   H1 2024
    Proforma
    SBS    		   Change
        €m % of Rev.   €m % of Rev.   €m Basis Points
    Product revenue   137.7 74.8%   118.2 67.5%   + 19.5 + 729
    Services revenue   46.5 25.2%   57.0 32.5%   – 10.5 – 729
    Total revenue   184.2     175.2     + 8.9  
    Total costs of revenue   76.6     73.1     + 3.5  
    GROSS PROFIT   107.6 58.4%   102.1 58.3%   + 5.5 + 14
    o/w product gross profit   98.6 71.6%   87.1 73.6%   + 11.5 – 202
    o/w services gross profit   9.0 19.3%   15.1 26.4%   – 6.1 – 710
    Operating expenses   93.0 50.5%   99.3 56.7%   – 6.3 – 619
    o/w research & development   60.6 32.9%   63.8 36.4%   – 3.3 – 354
    o/w sales & marketing   19.8 10.7%   20.5 11.7%   – 0.7 – 93
    o/w general & administrative   12.6 6.8%   15.0 8.6%   – 2.4 – 173
    PROFIT ON OPERATING ACTIVITIES   14.6 7.9%   2.8 1.6%   + 11.8 + 633
    Quarterly Revenue Breakdown by Portfolio Brand
                 
        Q1 2025   Q2 2025   H1 2025
    €m      
    Axway Scope   82.5   78.3   160.8
    SBS Scope   88.3   95.8   184.2
                 
    Consolidation   -0.4   -0.6   -1.0
                 
    74Software   170.4   173.5   344.0

    Appendices (3/5)

    Quarterly Revenue Breakdown by Type
                 
        Q1 2025   Q2 2025   H1 2025
    €m / %      
    Product revenue   139.1   141.0   280.0
    Recurring revenue   129.5   128.4   258.0
    o/w Maintenance & Support   47.0   44.5   91.5
    o/w Customer-managed Subscription   48.6   50.1   98.7
    o/w Own-managed Subscription   34.0   33.8   67.8
    License revenue   9.5   12.5   22.1
                 
    Services revenue   31.3   32.6   64.0
                 
    Total revenue   170.4   173.6   344.0
    Quarterly Revenue Breakdown by Type – Axway
                 
        Q1 2025   Q2 2025   H1 2025
    €m / %      
    Product revenue   73.4   69.8   143.3
    Recurring revenue   72.1   69.5   141.6
    o/w Maintenance & Support   14.4   12.8   27.2
    o/w Customer-managed Subscription   43.7   43.2   87.0
    o/w Own-managed Subscription   13.9   13.4   27.4
    License revenue   1.3   0.4   1.7
                 
    Services revenue   9.0   8.5   17.5
                 
    Total revenue – Axway   82.5   78.3   160.8
    Quarterly Revenue Breakdown by Type – SBS
                 
        Q1 2025   Q2 2025   H1 2025
    €m / %      
    Product revenue   66.0   71.7   137.7
    Recurring revenue   57.9   59.5   117.3
    o/w Maintenance & Support   32.5   31.7   64.2
    o/w Customer-managed Subscription   4.9   6.9   11.7
    o/w Own-managed Subscription   20.5   20.9   41.4
    License revenue   8.2   12.2   20.4
                 
    Services revenue   22.3   24.2   46.5
                 
    Total revenue SBS   88.3   95.8   184.2

    Appendices (4/5)

    Half-year Revenue Breakdown by Portfolio Brand & Type      
                     
        H1 2025
    Axway    		   H1 2025
    SBS    		   H1 2025
    Consolidation    		   H1 2025
    74Software
    €m / %        
    Product revenue   143.3   137.7   -1.0   280.0
    Recurring revenue   141.6   117.3   -1.0   258.0
    o/w Maintenance & Support   27.2   64.2   0.0   91.5
    o/w Customer-managed Subscription   87.0   11.7   0.0   98.7
    o/w Own-managed Subscription   27.4   41.4   -1.0   67.8
    License revenue   1.7   20.4   0.0   22.1
                     
    Services revenue   17.5   46.5   0.0   64.0
                     
    Total revenue   160.8   184.2   -1.0   344.0
    Half-year Revenue Breakdown by Portfolio Brand & Type      
                     
        H1 2024
    Axway    		   H1 2024 Proforma
    SBS    		   H1 2024 Proforma Consolidation   H1 2024 Proforma 74Software
    €m / %        
    Product revenue   130.5   118.2   0.0   248.7
    Recurring revenue   127.9   101.4   0.0   229.3
    o/w Maintenance & Support   34.6   61.6   0.0   96.2
    o/w Customer-managed Subscription   67.3   9.3   0.0   76.6
    o/w Own-managed Subscription   25.9   30.5   0.0   56.5
    License revenue   2.6   16.8   0.0   19.4
                     
    Services revenue   18.2   57.0   0.0   75.2
                     
    Total revenue   148.7   175.2   0.0   323.9
    Half-year Revenue Breakdown by Region
                 
      H1 2025 H1 2024
    Proforma    		 H1 2024
    Restated    		 Total
    Growth    		 Organic
    Growth
     
      €m % of Rev.
    Europe 208.1 60.5% 203.0 203.2 2.5% 2.4%
    o/w France 99.5 28.9% 99.7 99.7 -0.2% -0.2%
    o/w UK 46.7 13.6% 44.8 45.0 4.3% 3.7%
    Americas 73.3 21.3% 65.6 64.6 11.7% 13.5%
    Middle East & Africa 43.1 12.5% 39.3 39.3 9.7% 9.7%
    Asia & Pacific 19.4 5.7% 15.9 15.8 22.0% 22.7%
                 
    74Software 344.0   323.9 323.0 6.2% 6.5%

    Appendices (5/5)

    Headcount
           
      30/06/2025 31/12/2024 Change
    Europe 3.001 3.090 -89
    Americas 370 378 -8
    Asia – Pacific 869 882 -13
    Middle East – Africa 439 437 2
           
    TOTAL 4.679 4.787 -108
    Impact on Half-year Revenue of Changes in Scope and Exchange Rates
           
    €m / % H1 2025 H1 2024 Growth
    Revenue 344.0 148.7 + 131.4%
    Changes in exchange rates   -0.9  
    Revenue at constant exchange rates 344.0 147.7 + 132.8%
    Changes in scope   +175.2  
    Revenue at constant scope and exchange rates 344.0 323.0 + 6.5%
    Changes in Main Exchange Rates
           
    For 1€ Average Rate
    H1 2025    		 Average rate
    H1 2024    		 Change
    US Dollar 1.093 1.081 – 1.1%
    Great Britain Pound 0.842 0.855 + 1.5%

    1 The interim consolidated financial statements were subject to limited review procedures.

    Attachment

    The MIL Network –

  • MIL-OSI Africa: What makes a person cool? Global study has some answers

    Source: The Conversation – Africa – By Todd Pezzuti, Associate Professor, Business School, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez

    From Lagos to Cape Town, Santiago to Seoul, people want to be cool. “Cool” is a word we hear everywhere – in music, in fashion, on social media. We use it to describe certain types of people.

    But what exactly makes someone cool? Is it just about being popular or trendy? Or is there something deeper going on?

    In a recent study I conducted with other marketing professors, we set out to answer a simple but surprisingly unexplored question. What are the personality traits and values that make someone seem cool – and do they differ across cultures?

    We asked nearly 6,000 people from 12 countries to think of someone they personally knew who was “cool”, “not cool”, “good”, or “not good”. Then we asked them to describe that person’s traits and values using validated psychological measures. We used this data to examine how coolness differs from general likeability or morality.

    Read more: What makes a person seem wise? Global study finds that cultures do differ – but not as much as you’d think

    The countries ranged from Australia to Turkey, the US to Germany, India to China, Nigeria to South Africa.

    Our data showed that coolness is uniquely associated with the same six traits around the world: cool people tend to be extroverted, hedonistic, adventurous, open, powerful, and autonomous.

    These findings help settle a long debate about what it means to be cool today.

    A brief history of cool

    Early writing on coolness described it as emotional restraint: being calm, composed and unbothered. This view, rooted in the metaphor of temperature and emotion, saw coolness as a sign of self-control and mastery.

    Some of these scholars trace this form of cool to slavery and segregation, where emotional restraint was a survival strategy among enslaved Africans and their descendants, symbolising autonomy and dignity in the face of oppression. Others propose “cool” restraint existed long before slavery.

    Regardless, jazz musicians in the 1940s first helped popularise this cool persona – relaxed, emotionally contained, and stylish – an image later embraced by youth and various countercultures. Corporations like Nike, Apple and MTV commercialised cool, turning a countercultural attitude into a more commercially friendly global aesthetic.

    This is what makes someone cool

    Our findings suggest that the meaning of cool has changed. It’s a way to identify and label people with a specific psychological profile.

    Cool people are outgoing and social (extroverted). They seek pleasure and enjoyment (hedonistic). They take risks and try new things (adventurous). They are curious and open to new experiences (open). They have influence or charisma (powerful). And perhaps most of all, they do things their own way (autonomous).

    This finding held remarkably steady across countries. Whether you’re in the US, South Korea, Spain or South Africa, people tend to think that cool individuals have this same “cool profile”.

    We also found that even though coolness overlaps with being good or favourable, being cool and being good are not the same. Being kind, calm, traditional, secure and conscientious were more associated with being good than cool. Some “cool” traits were not necessarily good at all, like extroversion and hedonism.

    What about South Africa and Nigeria?

    One of the most fascinating aspects of our study was seeing how consistent the meaning of coolness was across cultures – even in countries with very different traditions and values.

    In South Africa, participants viewed cool people as extroverted, hedonistic, powerful, adventurous, open and autonomous – just like participants from Europe to Asia. In South Africa, however, coolness is especially distinct from being good. South Africa is one of the countries in which being hedonistic, powerful, adventurous and autonomous was much more cool than good.

    Read more: Which African countries are flourishing? Scientists have a new way of measuring well-being

    Nigeria was the only country in which cool and uncool people were equally autonomous. So basically, individuality wasn’t seen as cool. That difference might reflect cultural values that place a greater emphasis on community, respect for elders, or collective identity. In places where tradition and hierarchy matter, doing your own thing might not be cool.

    Social sciences, like all science, however, are not perfect. So, it’s reasonable to speculate that autonomy might still be cool in Nigeria, with the discrepancy resulting from methodological issues such as how the Nigerian participants interpreted and responded to the survey.

    Nigeria was also unique because the distinction between cool and good wasn’t as notable as in other countries. So coolness was seen more as goodness than in the other countries.

    Why does this matter?

    The fact that so many cultures agree on what makes someone cool suggests that “coolness” may serve a shared social function. The traits that make people cool may make them more likely to try new things, innovate new styles and fashions, and influence others. These individuals often push boundaries and introduce new ideas – in fashion, art, politics, or technology. They inspire others and help shape what’s seen as modern, desirable, or forward-thinking.

    Coolness, in this sense, might function as a kind of cultural status marker – a reward for being bold, open-minded and innovative. It’s not just about surface style. It’s about signalling that you’re ahead of the curve, and that others should pay attention.

    So what can we learn from this?

    For one, young people in South Africa, Nigeria, and around the world may have more in common than we often think. Despite vast cultural differences, they tend to admire the same traits. That opens up interesting possibilities for cross-cultural communication, collaboration and influence.

    Second, if we want to connect with or inspire others – whether through education, branding, or leadership – it helps to understand what people see as cool. Coolness may not be a universal virtue, but it is a universal currency.

    And finally, there’s something reassuring in all this: coolness is not about being famous or rich. It’s about how you live. Are you curious? Courageous? True to yourself? If so, chances are someone out there thinks you’re cool – no matter where you’re from.

    – What makes a person cool? Global study has some answers
    – https://theconversation.com/what-makes-a-person-cool-global-study-has-some-answers-261266

    MIL OSI Africa –

  • MIL-OSI: NorthEast Community Bancorp, Inc. Reports Results for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2025

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    WHITE PLAINS, N.Y., July 24, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — NorthEast Community Bancorp, Inc. (Nasdaq: NECB) (the “Company”), the parent holding company of NorthEast Community Bank (the “Bank”), reported net income of $11.2 million, or $0.85 per basic share and $0.82 per diluted share, for the three months ended June 30, 2025 compared to net income of $12.8 million, or $0.98 per basic share and $0.97 per diluted share, for the three months ended June 30, 2024. In addition, the Company reported net income of $21.7 million, or $1.65 per basic share and $1.60 per diluted share, for the six months ended June 30, 2025 compared to net income of $24.2 million, or $1.84 per basic share and $1.83 per diluted share, for the six months ended June 30, 2024.

    Kenneth A. Martinek, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, stated “We are once again pleased to be able to report continued strong performance throughout our entire loan portfolio, with continuing focus on construction lending in high demand, high absorption sub-markets, as well as our growing cooperative building lending program throughout Manhattan, Brooklyn, the Bronx, and Queens. Despite the uncertainty throughout the national economy during the first half of the year, loan demand continues to increase with outstanding unfunded commitments exceeding $636 million at June 30, 2025.”

    Highlights for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2025 are as follows:

    • Performance metrics continue to be strong with a return on average total assets ratio of 2.27%, a return on average shareholders’ equity ratio of 13.37%, and an efficiency ratio of 40.52% for the three months ended June 30, 2025. For the six months ended June 30, 2025, the Company reported a return on average total assets ratio of 2.20%, a return on average shareholders’ equity ratio of 13.18%, and an efficiency ratio of 41.08%.
    • Asset quality metrics continue to remain strong with no non-performing loans at either June 30, 2025 or December 31, 2024, and non-performing assets to total assets of 0.04% and 0.25% at June 30, 2025 and at December 31, 2024, respectively. Our allowance for credit losses related to loans totaled $4.7 million, or 0.26% of total loans at June 30, 2025 compared to $4.8 million, or 0.27% of total loans at December 31, 2024.
    • Total stockholders’ equity increased by $18.3 million, or 5.8%, to $336.7 million, or 17.06% of total assets as of June 30, 2025 from $318.3 million, or 15.84% of total assets as of December 31, 2024.

    Balance Sheet Summary

    Total assets decreased $35.7 million, or 1.8%, to $2.0 billion at June 30, 2025, from $2.0 billion at December 31, 2024. The decrease in assets was primarily due to decreases in cash and cash equivalents of $18.9 million, net loans of $14.9 million, and real estate owned of $4.4 million, partially offset by an increase of $3.4 million in equity securities.

    Cash and cash equivalents decreased $18.9 million, or 24.1%, to $59.4 million at June 30, 2025 from $78.3 million at December 31, 2024. The decrease in cash and cash equivalents was a result of a decrease in deposits of $191.2 million, partially offset by increases of $135.0 million in borrowings, decreases of $14.9 million in net loans, and increases of $3.4 million in equity securities.

    Equity securities increased $3.4 million, or 15.2%, to $25.3 million at June 30, 2025 from $22.0 million at December 31, 2024. The increase in equity securities was attributable to the purchase of $3.0 million in equity securities during the six months ended June 30, 2025 and market appreciation of $351,000 due to market interest rate volatility during the six months ended June 30, 2025.

    Securities held-to-maturity decreased $218,000, or 1.5%, to $14.4 million at June 30, 2025 from $14.6 million at December 31, 2024 due to $128,000 in maturities and pay-downs of various investment securities.

    Loans, net of the allowance for credit losses, decreased $14.9 million, or 0.8%, to $1.8 billion at June 30, 2025 from $1.8 billion at December 31, 2024.   The decrease in loans consisted of decreases of $102.7 million in construction loans, $1.6 million in consumer loans, $482,000 in mixed-use loans, $475,000 in non-residential loans, and $74,000 in one-to-four family loans. The decrease in our construction loan portfolio was due to normal pay-downs and principal reductions as construction projects were completed and either condominium units were sold to end buyers or multi-family rental buildings were refinanced by other financial institutions. The decrease in construction loans was offset by increases of $85.9 million in multi-family loans of which $43.2 million is attributed to residential cooperative building loans and $4.3 million in commercial and industrial loans.

    During the six months ended June 30, 2025, we originated loans totaling $462.7 million consisting primarily of $338.8 million in construction loans, $95.4 million in multi-family loans of which $32.9 million is attributed to residential cooperative building loans, $27.8 million in commercial and industrial loans, and $730,000 in mixed-use loans. The $338.8 million in construction loans had 41.6% disbursed at loan closing, with the remaining funds to be disbursed over the terms of the construction loans.

    The allowance for credit losses related to loans decreased to $4.7 million as of June 30, 2025, from $4.8 million as of December 31, 2024. The decrease in the allowance for credit losses related to loans was due to charge-offs totaling $602,000, offset by recoveries totaling $434,000 and provision for credit losses totaling $62,000.  

    Premises and equipment increased $536,000, or 2.2%, to $25.3 million at June 30, 2025 from $24.8 million at December 31, 2024 primarily due to the purchases of additional fixed assets.

    Federal Home Loan Bank stock increased $688,000, or 173.3%, to $1.1 million at June 30, 2025 from $397,000 at December 31, 2024 primarily due to an increase in borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank.

    Bank owned life insurance (“BOLI”) increased $336,000, or 1.3%, to $26.1 million at June 30, 2025 from $25.7 million at December 31, 2024 due to increases in the BOLI cash value.

    Accrued interest receivable decreased $1.4 million, or 10.1%, to $12.1 million at June 30, 2025 from $13.5 million at December 31, 2024 due to a decrease of $14.9 million in the loan portfolio.

    Real estate owned decreased $4.4 million, or 85.0%, to $767,000 at June 30, 2025 from $5.1 million at December 31, 2024 due to the sale of a foreclosed property to an independent third party.

    Property held for investment was $1.4 million at both June 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024.

    Right of use assets — operating increased $382,000, or 9.6%, to $4.4 million at June 30, 2025 from $4.0 million at December 31, 2024, primarily due to the physical expansion of a branch office and the resulting revision to the operating lease, partially offset by the amortization of the right of use assets.

    Other assets decreased $1.2 million, or 10.5%, to $10.4 million at June 30, 2025 from $11.6 million at December 31, 2024 due to decreases of $1.2 million in tax assets and $118,000 in prepaid expenses, partially offset by an increase of $116,000 in suspense accounts.

    Total deposits decreased $191.2 million, or 11.5%, to $1.5 billion at June 30, 2025 from $1.7 billion at December 31, 2024. The decrease in deposits was primarily due to a decrease in certificates of deposit of $251.5 million, or 25.1%, partially offset by increases in NOW/money market accounts of $56.4 million, or 23.2%, savings account balances of $3.3 million, or 2.4%, and non-interest bearing deposits of $2.2 million, or 0.8%.   The decrease of $251.5 million in certificates of deposit consisted of a decrease in retail certificates of deposit of $134.2 million, or 26.2%, and a decrease in brokered certificates of deposit of $129.1 million, or 29.7%, partially offset by an increase in non-brokered listing services certificates of deposit of $11.7 million, or 35.0%.

    The decrease in retail certificates of deposit was due to a shift in deposits to our retail high yield money market accounts. The decrease in brokered certificates of deposit was due to management’s strategy to reduce the cost of funds by “calling” higher rate brokered deposits on their call dates.

    Advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance increased $804,000, or 49.7%, to $2.4 million at June 30, 2025 from $1.6 million at December 31, 2024 due primarily to accumulation of real estate tax payments from borrowers.

    Borrowings increased to $135.0 million at June 30, 2025 from none at December 31, 2024 due primarily to management’s strategy to diversify funding sources.

    Lease liability – operating increased $389,000, or 9.5%, to $4.5 million at June 30, 2025 from $4.1 million at December 31, 2024, primarily due to the physical expansion of a branch office and the resulting revision to the operating lease, partially offset by the amortization of the lease liability.

    Accounts payable and accrued expenses increased $970,000, or 6.7%, to $15.5 million at June 30, 2025 from $14.5 million at December 31, 2024 due primarily to increases in accrued borrowing interest expense of $905,000, accounts payable of $666,000, deferred compensation of $312,000, suspense accounts for loan closings of $269,000, and the allowance for credit losses for off-balance sheet commitments of $175,000, partially offset by a decrease in accrued expense of $1.4 million.

    The allowance for credit losses for off-balance sheet commitments increased $175,000, or 24.9%, to $879,000 at June 30, 2025 from $704,000 at December 31, 2024 due primarily to an increase of $74.5 million, or 13.3%, in off-balance sheet commitments since December 31, 2024.

    Stockholders’ equity increased $18.3 million, or 5.8% to $336.7 million at June 30, 2025, from $318.3 million at December 31, 2024. The increase in stockholders’ equity was due to net income of $21.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025, an increase of $638,000 in earned employee stock ownership plan shares coupled with a reduction of $435,000 in unearned employee stock ownership plan shares, and the amortization expense of $894,000 relating to restricted stock and stock options granted under the Company’s 2022 Equity Incentive Plan, partially offset by dividends declared of $5.4 million and $4,000 in other comprehensive loss.

    Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2025 and 2024

    Net Interest Income

    Net interest income was $25.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025, as compared to $26.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2024. The decrease in net interest income of $1.1 million, or 4.4%, was primarily due to a decrease in interest income that exceeded a decrease in interest expense and a decrease in the yield on interest earning assets, partially offset by a smaller decrease in the cost of funds for interest bearing liabilities.

    Total interest and dividend income decreased $2.2 million, or 5.5%, to $38.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025 from $40.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2024. The decrease in interest and dividend income was due to a decrease in the yield on interest earning assets by 78 basis points from 8.89% for the three months ended June 30, 2024 to 8.11% for the three months ended June 30, 2025, partially offset by an increase in the average balance of interest earning assets of $64.9 million, or 3.6%, to $1.9 billion for the three months ended June 30, 2025 from $1.8 billion for the three months ended June 30, 2024.

    Interest expense decreased $1.1 million, or 7.5%, to $13.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025 from $14.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2024. The decrease in interest expense was due to a decrease in the cost of interest bearing liabilities by 45 basis points from 4.33% for the three months ended June 30, 2024 to 3.88% for the three months ended June 30, 2025, partially offset by an increase in average interest bearing liabilities of  $41.9 million, or 3.2%, to $1.3 billion for the three months ended June 30, 2025 from $1.3 billion for the three months ended June 30, 2024.

    Our net interest margin decreased 44 basis points, or 7.6%, to 5.35% for the three months ended June 30, 2025 compared to 5.79% for the three months ended June 30, 2024. The decrease in the net interest margin was due to a 100 basis points decrease in the Federal Funds rate from September 2024 to December 2024 that resulted in a decrease in the yield on interest-earning assets, partially offset by a smaller decrease in the cost of funds on interest-bearing liabilities.

    Credit Loss Expense

    The Company recorded no credit loss expense for the three months ended June 30, 2025 compared to a credit loss expense reduction of $226,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2024.

    The credit loss expense reduction of $226,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2024 was comprised of a credit loss expense reduction for off-balance sheet commitments of $218,000 and a credit loss expense reduction for held-to-maturity investment securities of $8,000. The credit loss expense reduction for off-balance sheet commitments of $218,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2024 was primarily attributable to a reduction of $30.4 million in the level of off-balance sheet commitments and favorable trends in the economy.

    With respect to the allowance for credit losses for loans, we charged-off $485,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2025 as compared to charge-offs of $12,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2024. The charge-offs during both periods were against various unpaid overdrafts in our demand deposit accounts.

    We recorded recoveries of $82,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2025 compared to no recoveries during the three months ended June 30, 2024. The recoveries of $82,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2025 comprised of recoveries from a previously charged-off unpaid overdraft on a demand deposit account.

    Non-Interest Income

    Non-interest income for the three months ended June 30, 2025 was $858,000 compared to non-interest income of $731,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2024. The increase of $127,000, or 17.4%, in total non-interest income was primarily due to increases of $71,000 in unrealized gain on equity securities, $48,000 in other loan fees and service charges, and $8,000 in BOLI income.

    The increase in unrealized gain on equity securities was due to an unrealized gain of $51,000 on equity securities during the three months ended June 30, 2025 compared to an unrealized loss of $20,000 on equity securities during the three months ended June 30, 2024. Both the unrealized gain of $51,000 on equity securities during the three months ended June 30, 2025 and the unrealized loss of $20,000 on equity securities during the three months ended June 30, 2024 were due to market interest rate volatility during both periods.

    The increase of $48,000 in other loan fees and service charges was due to an increase of $60,000 in ATM/debit card/ACH fees and an increase of $2,000 in deposit account fees, partially offset by a decrease of $14,000 in other loan fees and loan servicing fees. The increase in BOLI income of $8,000 was due to an increase in the yield on BOLI assets.

    Non-Interest Expense

    Non-interest expense increased $1.0 million, or 10.6%, to $10.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025 from $9.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2024. The increase resulted primarily from increases of $398,000 in salaries and employee benefits, $220,000 in real estate owned expense, $151,000 in outside data processing expense, $111,000 in other operating expense, $69,000 in occupancy expense, $32,000 in equipment expense, and $29,000 in advertising expense.

    Income Taxes

    We recorded income tax expense of $4.3 million and $4.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively. For the three months ended June 30, 2025, we had approximately $210,000 in tax exempt income, compared to approximately $199,000 in tax exempt income for the three months ended June 30, 2024. Our effective income tax rates were 27.6% for the three months ended June 30, 2025 and June 30, 2024.  

    Results of Operations for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2025 and 2024

    Net Interest Income

    Net interest income was $49.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025 as compared to $51.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2024. The decrease in net interest income of $1.9 million, or 3.7%, was primarily due to a decrease in interest income that exceeded a decrease in interest expense and a decrease in the yield on interest earning assets, partially offset by a smaller decrease in the cost of funds for interest bearing liabilities.

    Total interest and dividend income decreased $2.1 million, or 2.7%, to $76.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025 from $78.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2024. The decrease in interest and dividend income was due to a decrease in the yield on interest earning assets by 75 basis points from 8.83% for the six months ended June 30, 2024 to 8.08% for the six months ended June 30, 2025, partially offset by an increase in the average balance of interest earning assets of $112.3 million, or 6.3%, to $1.9 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2025 from $1.8 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2024.

    Interest expense decreased $242,000, or 0.9%, to $26.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025 from $27.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2024. The decrease in interest expense was due to a decrease in the cost of interest bearing liabilities by 34 basis points from 4.31% for the six months ended June 30, 2024 to 3.97% for the six months ended June 30, 2025, partially offset by an increase in average interest bearing liabilities of $95.7 million, or 7.6%, to $1.4 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2025 from $1.3 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2024.

    Net interest margin decreased 54 basis points, or 9.4%, to 5.23% for the six months ended June 30, 2025 compared to 5.77% for the six months ended June 30, 2024. The decrease in the net interest margin was due to a 100 basis points decrease in the Federal Funds rate from September 2024 to December 2024 that resulted in a decrease in the yield on interest-earning assets, partially offset by a smaller decrease in the cost of funds on interest-bearing liabilities.

    Credit Loss Expense

    The Company recorded a credit loss expense of $237,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2025 compared to a credit loss expense reduction of $391,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2024. The credit loss expense of $237,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2025 was comprised of credit loss expense for loans of $62,000 and credit loss expense for off-balance sheet commitments of $175,000.

    The credit loss expense for loans of $62,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2025 was primarily due to an increase in the multi-family loan portfolio. The credit loss expense for off-balance sheet commitments of $175,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2025 was primarily due to an increase in unfunded off-balance sheet commitments.

    The credit loss expense reduction of $391,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2024 was comprised of a credit loss expense reduction for off-balance sheet commitments of $235,000, a credit loss expense reduction for loans of $145,000, and a credit loss expense reduction for held-to-maturity investment securities of $11,000. The credit loss expense reduction for off-balance sheet commitments of $235,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2024 was primarily attributed to a reduction of $27.2 million in the level of off-balance sheet commitments and favorable trends in the economy. The credit loss expense reduction for loans of $145,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2024 was primarily attributed to favorable trends in the economy.

    With respect to the allowance for credit losses for loans, we charged-off $602,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2025 as compared to charge-offs of $33,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2024. The charge-offs during both periods were against various unpaid overdrafts in our demand deposit accounts.

    We recorded recoveries of $434,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2025 compared to no recoveries during the six months ended June 30, 2024. The recoveries of $434,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2025 comprised of recoveries of $350,000 with respect to a previously charged-off non-residential mortgage loan and $84,000 from previously charged-off unpaid overdrafts on demand deposit accounts.

    Non-Interest Income

    Non-interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2025 was $2.1 million compared to non-interest income of $1.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2024. The increase of $808,000, or 62.9%, in total non-interest income was primarily due to increases of $453,000 in unrealized gain on equity securities, $326,000 in other loan fees and service charges, $17,000 in BOLI income, and $12,000 in miscellaneous other non-interest income.

    The increase in unrealized gain on equity securities was due to an unrealized gain of $351,000 on equity securities during the six months ended June 30, 2025 compared to an unrealized loss of $102,000 on equity securities during the six months ended June 30, 2024. Both the unrealized gain of $351,000 on equity securities during the 2025 period and the unrealized loss of $102,000 on equity securities during the 2024 period were due to market interest rate volatility during both periods.

    The increase of $326,000 in other loan fees and service charges was due to increases of $232,000 in other loan fees and loan servicing fees, $91,000 in ATM/debit card/ACH fees, and $3,000 in deposit account fees. The increase in BOLI income of $17,000 was due to an increase in the yield on BOLI assets.

    Non-Interest Expense

    Non-interest expense increased $1.9 million, or 10.2%, to $21.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025 from $19.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2024. The increase resulted primarily from increases of $980,000 in salaries and employee benefits, $332,000 in other operating expense, $251,000 in outside data processing expense, $238,000 in real estate owned expense, $108,000 in occupancy expense, and $43,000 in advertising expense, partially offset by a decrease of $4,000 in equipment expense.

    Income Taxes

    We recorded income tax expense of $8.3 million and $9.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2025, we had approximately $415,000 in tax exempt income, compared to approximately $394,000 in tax exempt income for the six months ended June 30, 2024. Our effective income tax rates were 27.7% and 28.3% for the six months ended June 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively.

    Asset Quality

    Non-performing assets were $767,000 at June 30, 2025 compared to $5.1 million at December 31, 2024.   The non-performing assets consisted of one foreclosed property located in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. We sold one foreclosed property totaling $4.3 million located in the Bronx, New York on June 30, 2025 to a third-party buyer at no loss to the Company and in connection therewith we provided the financing to complete the multi-family project.

    Our ratio of non-performing assets to total assets remained low at 0.04% at June 30, 2025 as compared to 0.25% at December 31, 2024.

    The Company’s allowance for credit losses related to loans was $4.7 million, or 0.26% of total loans as of June 30, 2025, compared to $4.8 million, or 0.27% of total loans as of December 31, 2024. Based on a review of the loans that were in the loan portfolio at June 30, 2025, management believes that the allowance for credit losses related to loans is maintained at a level that represents its best estimate of inherent losses in the loan portfolio that were both probable and reasonably estimable.

    In addition, at June 30, 2025, the Company’s allowance for credit losses related to off-balance sheet commitments totaled $879,000 and the allowance for credit losses related to held-to-maturity debt securities totaled $126,000.

    Capital

    The Company’s total stockholders’ equity to assets ratio was 17.06% as of June 30, 2025.   At June 30, 2025, the Company had the ability to borrow $740.2 million from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, $23.1 million from the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York, and $8.0 million from Atlantic Community Bankers Bank.

    The Bank’s capital position remains strong relative to current regulatory requirements and the Bank is considered a well-capitalized institution under the Prompt Corrective Action framework. As of June 30, 2025, the Bank had a tier 1 leverage capital ratio of 15.87% and a total risk-based capital ratio of 14.99%.

    The Company completed its first stock repurchase program on April 14, 2023 whereby the Company repurchased 1,637,794 shares, or 10%, of the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock. The cost of the stock repurchase program totaled $23.0 million, including commission costs and Federal excise taxes.   Of the total shares repurchased under this program, 957,275 of such shares were repurchased during 2023 at a total cost of $13.7 million, including commission costs and Federal excise taxes.

    The Company commenced its second stock repurchase program on May 30, 2023 whereby the Company will repurchase 1,509,218, or 10%, of the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock. As of June 30, 2025, the Company had repurchased 1,091,174 shares of common stock under its second repurchase program, at a cost of $17.2 million, including commission costs and Federal excise taxes.

    About NorthEast Community Bancorp

    NorthEast Community Bancorp, headquartered at 325 Hamilton Avenue, White Plains, New York 10601, is the holding company for NorthEast Community Bank, which conducts business through its eleven branch offices located in Bronx, New York, Orange, Rockland, and Sullivan Counties in New York and Essex, Middlesex, and Norfolk Counties in Massachusetts and three loan production offices located in New City, New York, White Plains, New York, and Danvers, Massachusetts. For more information about NorthEast Community Bancorp and NorthEast Community Bank, please visit www.necb.com.

    Forward Looking Statement

    This press release contains certain forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include statements regarding anticipated future events and can be identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. They often include words such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” and “intend” or future or conditional verbs such as “will,” “would,” “should,” “could,” or “may.” These statements are based upon the current beliefs and expectations of the Company’s management and are subject to significant risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements as a result of numerous factors. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from expected results include, but are not limited to, changes in market interest rates, regional and national economic conditions (including higher inflation or recessionary conditions and their impact on regional and national economic conditions), legislative and regulatory changes, monetary and fiscal policies of the United States government, including policies of the United States Treasury and the Federal Reserve Board, the impacts of tariffs, sanctions and other trade policies of the United States and its global trading counterparts, the quality and composition of the loan or investment portfolios, demand for loan products, decreases in deposit levels necessitating increased borrowing to fund loans and securities, competition, demand for financial services in NorthEast Community Bank’s market area, changes in the real estate market values in NorthEast Community Bank’s market area, the impact of failures or disruptions in or breaches of the Company’s operational or security systems, data or infrastructure, or those of third parties, including as a result of cyberattacks or campaigns, and changes in relevant accounting principles and guidelines. Additionally, other risks and uncertainties may be described in our annual and quarterly reports filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), which are available through the SEC’s website located at www.sec.gov. These risks and uncertainties should be considered in evaluating any forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. Except as required by applicable law or regulation, the Company does not undertake, and specifically disclaims any obligation, to release publicly the result of any revisions that may be made to any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of the statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events.

    CONTACT:  Kenneth A. Martinek
      Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
       
    PHONE:  (914) 684-2500
     
    NORTHEAST COMMUNITY BANCORP, INC.
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
    (Unaudited)
     
        June 30,   December 31,
        2025     2024  
        (In thousands, except share
        and per share amounts)
    ASSETS            
    Cash and amounts due from depository institutions   $ 19,042     $ 13,700  
    Interest-bearing deposits     40,331       64,559  
    Total cash and cash equivalents     59,373       78,259  
    Certificates of deposit     100       100  
    Equity securities     25,345       21,994  
    Securities held-to-maturity (net of allowance for credit losses of $126 and $126, respectively)     14,398       14,616  
    Loans receivable     1,797,618       1,812,647  
    Deferred loan fees, net     (62 )     (49 )
    Allowance for credit losses     (4,724 )     (4,830 )
    Net loans     1,792,832       1,807,768  
    Premises and equipment, net     25,341       24,805  
    Investments in restricted stock, at cost     1,085       397  
    Bank owned life insurance     26,074       25,738  
    Accrued interest receivable     12,119       13,481  
    Real estate owned     767       5,120  
    Property held for investment     1,352       1,370  
    Right of Use Assets – Operating     4,383       4,001  
    Right of Use Assets – Financing     345       347  
    Other assets     10,370       11,585  
    Total assets   $ 1,973,884     $ 2,009,581  
    LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY            
    Liabilities:            
    Deposits:            
    Non-interest bearing   $ 287,741     $ 287,135  
    Interest bearing     1,191,420       1,383,240  
    Total deposits     1,479,161       1,670,375  
    Advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance     2,422       1,618  
    Borrowings     135,000       –  
    Lease Liability – Operating     4,497       4,108  
    Lease Liability – Financing     628       609  
    Accounts payable and accrued expenses     15,500       14,530  
    Total liabilities     1,637,208       1,691,240  
                 
    Stockholders’ equity:            
    Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 25,000,000 shares authorized; none issued or outstanding   $ —     $ —  
    Common stock, $0.01 par value; 75,000,000 shares authorized; 14,023,376 shares and 14,016,254 shares outstanding, respectively     140       140  
    Additional paid-in capital     111,624       110,091  
    Unearned Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”) shares     (5,653 )     (6,088 )
    Retained earnings     230,345       213,974  
    Accumulated other comprehensive gain     220       224  
    Total stockholders’ equity     336,676       318,341  
    Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity   $ 1,973,884     $ 2,009,581  
                 
    NORTHEAST COMMUNITY BANCORP, INC.
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
    (Unaudited)
     
        Three Months Ended June 30,   Six Months Ended June 30,
        2025   2024     2025   2024  
        (In thousands, except per share amounts)   (In thousands, except per share amounts)
    INTEREST INCOME:                            
    Loans   $ 36,740     $ 38,634     $ 73,622     $ 75,337  
    Interest-earning deposits     1,027       1,385       2,108       2,585  
    Securities     272       218       516       436  
    Total Interest Income     38,039       40,237       76,246       78,358  
    INTEREST EXPENSE:                            
    Deposits     12,053       13,435       25,986       25,829  
    Borrowings     902       570       902       1,302  
    Financing lease     10       10       20       19  
    Total Interest Expense     12,965       14,015       26,908       27,150  
    Net Interest Income     25,074       26,222       49,338       51,208  
    Provision for (reversal of) credit loss     —       (226 )     237       (391 )
    Net Interest Income after Provision for (Reversal of) Credit Loss     25,074       26,448       49,101       51,599  
    NON-INTEREST INCOME:                            
    Other loan fees and service charges     611       563       1,351       1,025  
    Earnings on bank owned life insurance     170       162       336       319  
    Unrealized gain (loss) on equity securities     51       (20 )     351       (102 )
    Other     26       26       55       43  
    Total Non-Interest Income     858       731       2,093       1,285  
    NON-INTEREST EXPENSES:                            
    Salaries and employee benefits     5,650       5,252       11,583       10,603  
    Occupancy expense     743       674       1,489       1,381  
    Equipment     253       221       470       474  
    Outside data processing     758       607       1,494       1,243  
    Advertising     123       94       225       182  
    Real estate owned expense     247       27       277       39  
    Other     2,734       2,623       5,589       5,257  
    Total Non-Interest Expenses     10,508       9,498       21,127       19,179  
    INCOME BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES     15,424       17,681       30,067       33,705  
    PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES     4,254       4,883       8,330       9,533  
    NET INCOME   $ 11,170     $ 12,798     $ 21,737     $ 24,172  
                                 
    NORTHEAST COMMUNITY BANCORP, INC.
    SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
    (Unaudited)
     
        Three Months Ended June 30,   Six Months Ended June 30,
        2025     2024     2025     2024  
        (In thousands, except per share amounts)   (In thousands, except per share amounts)
    Per share data:                        
    Earnings per share – basic   $ 0.85     $ 0.98     $ 1.65     $ 1.84  
    Earnings per share – diluted     0.82       0.97       1.60       1.83  
    Weighted average shares outstanding – basic     13,216       13,084       13,204       13,119  
    Weighted average shares outstanding – diluted     13,568       13,181       13,563       13,205  
    Performance ratios/data:                        
    Return on average total assets     2.27 %     2.70 %     2.20 %     2.60 %
    Return on average shareholders’ equity     13.37 %     17.28 %     13.18 %     16.59 %
    Net interest income   $ 25,074     $ 26,222     $ 49,338     $ 51,208  
    Net interest margin     5.35 %     5.79 %     5.23 %     5.77 %
    Efficiency ratio     40.52 %     35.24 %     41.08 %     36.54 %
    Net charge-off ratio     0.09 %     0.00 %     0.01 %     0.00 %
                             
    Loan portfolio composition:                 June 30, 2025     December 31, 2024
    One-to-four family               $ 3,398     $ 3,472  
    Multi-family                 292,552       206,606  
    Mixed-use                 26,089       26,571  
    Total residential real estate                 322,039       236,649  
    Non-residential real estate                 28,971       29,446  
    Construction                 1,323,477       1,426,167  
    Commercial and industrial                 123,084       118,736  
    Consumer                 47       1,649  
    Gross loans                 1,797,618       1,812,647  
    Deferred loan fees, net                 (62 )     (49 )
    Total loans               $ 1,797,556     $ 1,812,598  
    Asset quality data:                        
    Loans past due over 90 days and still accruing               $ –     $ –  
    Non-accrual loans                 –       –  
    OREO property                 767       5,120  
    Total non-performing assets               $ 767     $ 5,120  
                             
    Allowance for credit losses to total loans                 0.26 %     0.27 %
    Allowance for credit losses to non-performing loans                 0.00 %     0.00 %
    Non-performing loans to total loans                 0.00 %     0.00 %
    Non-performing assets to total assets                 0.04 %     0.25 %
                             
    Bank’s Regulatory Capital ratios:                        
    Total capital to risk-weighted assets                 14.99 %     13.92 %
    Common equity tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets                 14.71 %     13.65 %
    Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets                 14.71 %     13.65 %
    Tier 1 leverage ratio                 15.87 %     14.44 %
     
    NORTHEAST COMMUNITY BANCORP, INC.
    NET INTEREST MARGIN ANALYSIS
    (Unaudited)
     
        Three Months Ended June 30, 2025   Three Months Ended June 30, 2024
        Average   Interest   Average   Average   Interest   Average
        Balance   and dividend   Yield   Balance   and dividend   Yield
        (In thousands, except yield/cost information)   (In thousands, except yield/cost information)
    Loan receivable gross   $ 1,754,363     $ 36,740     8.38 %   $ 1,687,029     $ 38,634     9.16 %
    Securities     37,839       265     2.80 %     33,438       199     2.38 %
    Federal Home Loan Bank stock     438       7     6.39 %     704       19     10.80 %
    Other interest-earning assets     83,135       1,027     4.94 %     89,736       1,385     6.17 %
    Total interest-earning assets     1,875,775       38,039     8.11 %     1,810,907       40,237     8.89 %
    Allowance for credit losses     (5,122 )                 (4,927 )            
    Non-interest-earning assets     95,651                   91,085              
    Total assets   $ 1,966,304                 $ 1,897,065              
                                         
    Interest-bearing demand deposit   $ 298,689     $ 2,401     3.22 %   $ 205,536     $ 1,930     3.76 %
    Savings and club accounts     141,238       761     2.16 %     158,292       982     2.48 %
    Certificates of deposit     815,000       8,891     4.36 %     884,626       10,523     4.76 %
    Total interest-bearing deposits     1,254,927       12,053     3.84 %     1,248,454       13,435     4.30 %
    Borrowed money     82,712       912     4.41 %     47,276       580     4.91 %
    Total interest-bearing liabilities     1,337,639       12,965     3.88 %     1,295,730       14,015     4.33 %
    Non-interest-bearing demand deposit     274,466                   285,368              
    Other non-interest-bearing liabilities     20,114                   19,641              
    Total liabilities     1,632,219                   1,600,739              
    Equity     334,085                   296,326              
    Total liabilities and equity   $ 1,966,304                 $ 1,897,065              
                                         
    Net interest income / interest spread         $ 25,074     4.23 %         $ 26,222     4.56 %
    Net interest rate margin                 5.35 %                 5.79 %
    Net interest earning assets   $ 538,136                 $ 515,177              
    Average interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities     140.23 %                 139.76 %            
     
    NORTHEAST COMMUNITY BANCORP, INC.
    NET INTEREST MARGIN ANALYSIS
    (Unaudited)
     
        Six Months Ended June 30, 2025   Six Months Ended June 30, 2024
        Average   Interest   Average   Average   Interest   Average
        Balance   and dividend   Yield   Balance   and dividend   Yield
        (In thousands, except yield/cost information)   (In thousands, except yield/cost information)
    Loan receivable gross   $ 1,761,069     $ 73,622     8.36 %   $ 1,649,686     $ 75,337     9.13 %
    Securities     37,298       500     2.68 %     33,643       396     2.35 %
    Federal Home Loan Bank stock     418       16     7.66 %     773       40     10.35 %
    Other interest-earning assets     88,277       2,108     4.78 %     90,644       2,585     5.70 %
    Total interest-earning assets     1,887,062       76,246     8.08 %     1,774,746       78,358     8.83 %
    Allowance for credit losses     (4,978 )                 (5,009 )            
    Non-interest-earning assets     96,071                   89,972              
    Total assets   $ 1,978,155                 $ 1,859,709              
                                         
    Interest-bearing demand deposit   $ 286,726     $ 4,846     3.38 %   $ 188,510     $ 3,483     3.70 %
    Savings and club accounts     140,077       1,491     2.13 %     170,531       2,184     2.56 %
    Certificates of deposit     888,136       19,649     4.42 %     847,606       20,162     4.76 %
    Total interest-bearing deposits     1,314,939       25,986     3.95 %     1,206,647       25,829     4.28 %
    Borrowed money     41,584       922     4.43 %     54,184       1,321     4.88 %
    Total interest-bearing liabilities     1,356,523       26,908     3.97 %     1,260,831       27,150     4.31 %
    Non-interest-bearing demand deposit     272,680                   288,639              
    Other non-interest-bearing liabilities     19,107                   18,865              
    Total liabilities     1,648,310                   1,568,335              
    Equity     329,845                   291,374              
    Total liabilities and equity   $ 1,978,155                 $ 1,859,709              
                                         
    Net interest income / interest spread         $ 49,338     4.11 %         $ 51,208     4.52 %
    Net interest rate margin                 5.23 %                 5.77 %
    Net interest earning assets   $ 530,539                 $ 513,915              
    Average interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities     139.11 %                 140.76 %            

    The MIL Network –

  • MIL-OSI: Love Not War AI Unveils Mathematical Framework That Aligns Capitalism with Collective Good

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    LONDON, UNITED KINGDOM, July 24, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Love Not War AI today announced the launch of Progressive Utility Mechanics, a newly discovered mathematical framework created by innovator Valraj Singh Mann. This groundbreaking system offers a universal method for designing economic models in which individual financial success automatically enhances social welfare. The announcement marks the first implementation of the framework in a real-world application via the LVAI cryptocurrency, positioning it as a potential tool for addressing systemic issues like poverty, climate change, and inequality at scale.

    Unlike traditional economic systems that create tension between profit and purpose, Progressive Utility Mechanics create mathematically structured guarantees that individual success automatically generates increasing social benefit. The framework is going to be demonstrated through LVAI (Love Not War AI), the first cryptocurrency where charitable impact grows over time, but applications extend across all human economic organization – from corporate structures to government policy to international development.

    “We’ve developed the mathematical framework that may reshape how economic systems are designed across sectors,” said Mann. “For the first time in history, we can create mathematically structured mechanisms that align individual greed with collective good automatically. This isn’t just about cryptocurrency – it’s about demonstrating that capitalism can be inherently charitable, that economic growth can systematically reduce poverty, and that success can help everyone through what we’re calling ‘Mann Mechanics.’”

    Independent analysis confirms this represents the first mathematically structured mechanism demonstrating that economic systems can be designed to automatically strengthen social outcomes as they grow, potentially addressing root causes of global inequality, environmental degradation, and systemic poverty.


    HUMANITY’S GREATEST ECONOMIC CHALLENGE

    Throughout history, human societies have struggled with the fundamental tension between individual success and collective welfare. Traditional capitalism creates wealth but concentrates it, leading to inequality. Socialist systems promote equality but reduce prosperity. Regulatory approaches create compliance costs and economic drag. Charitable solutions depend on voluntary giving that decreases as wealth concentrates.

    “Every economic system in human history has forced a choice between individual freedom and collective good,” noted Mann. “We’ve developed a mathematically structured mechanism demonstrating that choice may be false – they can be systematically unified through progressive design.”

    The framework addresses systemic challenges affecting billions globally:

    • Global Poverty: 700+ million people in extreme poverty despite unprecedented global wealth
    • Climate Change: Economic incentives that reward environmental destruction over restoration
    • Inequality Crisis: Wealth concentration accelerating in every developed economy
    • Corporate Externalities: Profit maximization creating social and environmental costs
    • Aid Dependency: International development creating dependency rather than self-sufficiency
    • Government Inefficiency: Tax systems that reduce productivity while funding bureaucracy


    PROGRESSIVE UTILITY MECHANICS: THE UNIVERSAL SOLUTION

    Progressive Utility Mechanics (also known as “Mann Mechanics”) create economic systems where individual market participation automatically generates increasing social benefit through mathematically structured allocation mechanisms that strengthen over time.

    This framework transforms traditional zero-sum economic thinking into positive-sum systems where everyone’s success helps everyone else automatically, without coercion, regulation, or voluntary charity.

    Real-world applications include:

    • Progressive Impact Corporations: Business structures where shareholder profits automatically fund stakeholder benefits, making successful companies automatically beneficial to their communities

    • Self-Funding Development Programs: Economic zones where business success automatically generates poverty reduction funding, creating sustainable development without foreign aid dependency

    • Progressive Environmental Bonds: Investment vehicles where profit automatically funds environmental restoration, aligning financial returns with ecological recovery

    • Municipal Progressive Systems: City economies where business success automatically improves public infrastructure and services, creating self-improving urban environments

    • Progressive Education Funding: Systems where private success automatically enhances public education, leveling educational playing fields through market mechanisms

    “This framework could eliminate the need to choose between economic growth and social good,” observed one policy researcher. “Every successful business, every profitable investment, every economic gain automatically helps solve humanity’s greatest challenges.”


    GLOBAL IMPACT POTENTIAL

    Progressive Utility Mechanics address the mathematical core of humanity’s most pressing challenges:

    Poverty Elimination: Systems where economic success automatically generates anti-poverty funding may provide sustainable income support without government intervention or international aid dependency.

    Climate Solutions: Investment structures where environmental restoration becomes systematically profitable through progressive mechanics may help reverse ecological damage while generating returns.

    Inequality Reduction: Economic designs where success automatically levels playing fields may reduce wealth concentration without reducing prosperity or economic freedom.
    Corporate Transformation: Business models where profit maximization automatically optimizes social and environmental outcomes could revolutionize capitalism without regulatory coercion.

    International Development: Self-funding development programs could replace aid dependency with sustainable economic systems that strengthen as they succeed.

    “We’re not just talking about improving existing systems,” emphasized Mann. “We’re demonstrating that fundamentally different systems are possible – ones that may systematically address problems rather than creating them.”


    MATHEMATICAL PROOF OF CONCEPT: LVAI IMPLEMENTATION

    LVAI cryptocurrency will serve as the first mathematical proof that Progressive Utility Mechanics work in practice, demonstrating charitable impact that increases rather than decreases over time through three-phase evolution:

    • Phase 1: Economic growth automatically funds ecosystem expansion

    • Phase 2: Balanced allocation prevents stagnation while building social impact capacity

    • Phase 3: Unused economic capacity automatically becomes permanent charity endowment.

    The implementation includes institutional-grade security (94/100 audit rating) and has been mathematically verified to create stronger charitable impact as the system matures, demonstrating that economic success can be systematically aligned with social benefit through mechanism design.


    APPLICATIONS ACROSS HUMAN CIVILIZATION

    The discovery provides mathematical foundations for redesigning economic organization across all sectors:

    Corporate Governance: Progressive Impact Corporations where shareholders profit more as stakeholder outcomes improve, automatically aligning business success with social good.

    Municipal Economics: Progressive Economic Zones where local business success automatically funds public goods, creating self-improving communities without tax burden increases.

    International Relations: Progressive development frameworks where economic growth in developing nations automatically generates sustainable funding for infrastructure, education, and healthcare.

    Environmental Policy: Progressive conservation systems where land preservation and restoration become more profitable over time, creating economic incentives for ecological recovery.

    Educational Systems: Progressive funding mechanisms where private educational success automatically enhances public education quality, reducing inequality through market forces rather than redistribution.

    Healthcare Systems: Progressive health economics where medical innovation profitability automatically funds public health improvements, aligning pharmaceutical profits with population wellness.


    RESHAPING ECONOMIC THEORY

    Progressive Utility Mechanics (Mann Mechanics) represent the first mathematical framework proving that Adam Smith’s “invisible hand” – the foundational concept from the 18th-century economist known as the “Father of Modern Economics” – can be engineered rather than hoped for, creating guaranteed alignment between individual rational behavior and optimal collective outcomes.

    The innovation addresses fundamental questions that have challenged economists, philosophers, and policymakers:

    • Can capitalism be inherently fair? YES – through progressive design
    • Can individual greed serve collective good automatically? YES – through mathematical alignment
    • Can economic growth reduce rather than increase inequality? YES – through systematic progressive allocation
    • Can free markets solve social problems without government intervention? YES – through proper incentive design

    “This could be the most important breakthrough in economics since Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations,” noted one academic researcher. “Mann Mechanics provide the missing mathematical framework for creating automatically beneficial economic systems, potentially establishing a new field of study alongside Nash Equilibrium – developed by John Nash, the Nobel Prize-winning mathematician portrayed in ‘A Beautiful Mind’ – and Keynesian Economics, created by John Maynard Keynes, the influential British economist whose theories shaped modern government economic policy.”


    POTENTIAL CIVILIZATIONAL SIGNIFICANCE

    If validated and widely implemented, Progressive Utility Mechanics may represent a significant advance in human economic organization since the development of market capitalism, potentially enabling:

    • Systematic poverty reduction through automatically self-funding anti-poverty systems
    • Climate change mitigation through profitable environmental restoration mechanisms
    • Inequality reduction without prosperity reduction through systematic leveling mechanisms
    • Corporate transformation from profit-maximizing to systematically beneficent entities
    • Government efficiency through market-based rather than bureaucratic social solutions

    “We’re exploring the potential to address humanity’s greatest challenges not through sacrifice or coercion, but by redesigning economic systems to systematically optimize for everyone’s benefit,” concluded Mann.


    PRIORITY ESTABLISHMENT

    This announcement establishes Valraj Singh Mann as the inventor of Progressive Utility Mechanics (Mann Mechanics) and creator of the mathematical framework for systematically aligning individual success with collective benefit. The innovation represents the first mathematically structured mechanism demonstrating that economic systems can be designed for systematic social optimization without reducing individual incentives or economic freedom.

    Comprehensive project documentation, including detailed whitepaper and technical specifications, is available at https://lovenotwar.ai


    ABOUT VAL MANN

    Valraj Singh Mann is the inventor of Progressive Utility Mechanics and creator of the mathematical framework for systematically aligning individual economic success with collective social benefit. Through breakthrough mathematical innovation, Mann has developed potential solutions to humanity’s greatest economic challenges while demonstrating that capitalism may be redesigned to be inherently beneficial to all participants.


    ABOUT PROGRESSIVE UTILITY MECHANICS

    Progressive Utility Mechanics (Mann Mechanics) represent a universally applicable mathematical framework for creating economic systems where individual success systematically generates increasing collective benefit. The principle provides potential applications across corporate governance, municipal economics, international development, environmental policy, and all forms of human economic organization.

    MEDIA CONTACT

    Ana Thapar
    Relations Manager
    Email: info@lovenotwar.ai
    Website: https://lovenotwar.ai
    New Community Channel: https://t.me/LoveNotWar_Base

    For global implementation discussions, academic collaboration, policy consultation, or interview requests, contact info@lovenotwar.ai with “Progressive Utility Framework” in the subject line.


    FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

    This press release contains forward-looking statements about potential applications of Progressive Utility Mechanics to global economic challenges. Implementation of any framework requires extensive testing, stakeholder collaboration, and adaptation to specific economic, legal, and cultural contexts. All projections represent potential applications based on mathematical modeling and require real-world validation.

    The MIL Network –

  • MIL-Evening Report: Keep fighting for a nuclear-free Pacific, Helen Clark warns Greenpeace over global storm clouds

    Asia Pacific Report

    Former New Zealand prime minister Helen Clark warned activists and campaigners in a speech on the deck of the Greenpeace environmental flagship Rainbow Warrior III last night to be wary of global “storm clouds” and the renewed existential threat of nuclear weapons.

    Speaking on her reflections on four decades after the bombing of the original Rainbow Warrior on 10 July 1985, she said that New Zealand had a lot to be proud of but the world was now in a “precarious” state.

    Clark praised Greenpeace over its long struggle, challenging the global campaigners to keep up the fight for a nuclear-free Pacific.

    “For New Zealand, having been proudly nuclear-free since the mid-1980s, life has got a lot more complicated for us as well, and I have done a lot of campaigning against New Zealand signing up to any aspect of the AUKUS arrangement because it seems to me that being associated with any agreement that supplies nuclear ship technology to Australia is more or less encouraging the development of nuclear threats in the South Pacific,” she said.

    “While I am not suggesting that Australians are about to put nuclear weapons on them, we know that others do. This is not the Pacific that we want.

    “It is not the Pacific that we fought for going back all those years.

    “So we need to be very concerned about these storm clouds gathering.”

    Lessons for humanity
    Clark was prime minister 1999-2008 and served as a minister in David Lange’s Labour government that passed New Zealand’s nuclear-free legislation in 1987 – two years after the Rainbow Warrior bombing by French secret agents.

    She was also head of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) in 2009-2017.

    “When you think 40 years on, humanity might have learned some lessons. But it seems we have to repeat the lessons over and over again, or we will be dragged on the path of re-engagement with those who use nuclear weapons as their ultimate defence,” Clark told the Greenpeace activists, crew and guests.

    “Forty years on, we look back with a lot of pride, actually, at how New Zealand responded to the bombing of the Rainbow Warrior. We stood up with the passage of the nuclear-free legislation in 1987, we stood up with a lot of things.

    “All of this is under threat; the international scene now is quite precarious with respect to nuclear weapons. This is an existential threat.”


    Nuclear-free Pacific reflections with Helen Clark         Video: Greenpeace

    In response to Tahitian researcher and advocate Ena Manuireva who spoke earlier about the legacy of a health crisis as a result of 30 years of French nuclear tests at Moruroa and Fangataufa, she recalled her own thoughts.

    “It reminds us of why we were so motivated to fight for a nuclear-free Pacific because we remember the history of what happened in French Polynesia, in the Marshall Islands, in the South Australian desert, at Maralinga, to the New Zealand servicemen who were sent up in the navy ships, the Rotoiti and the Pukaki, in the late 1950s, to stand on deck while the British exploded their bombs [at Christmas Island in what is today Kiribati].

    “These poor guys were still seeking compensation when I was PM with the illnesses you [Ena] described in French Polynesia.

    Former NZ prime minister Helen Clark . . . “I remember one of the slogans in the 1970s and 1980s was ‘if it is so safe, test them in France’.” Image: Asia Pacific Report

    Testing ground for ‘others’
    “So the Pacific was a testing ground for ‘others’ far away and I remember one of the slogans in the 1970s and 1980s was ‘if it is so safe, test them in France’. Right? It wasn’t so safe.

    “Mind you, they regarded French Polynesia as France.

    “David Robie asked me to write the foreword to the new edition of his book, Eyes of Fire: The Last Voyage and Legacy of the Rainbow Warrior, and it brought back so many memories of those times because those of you who are my age will remember that the 1980s were the peak of the Cold War.

    “We had the Reagan administration [in the US] that was actively preparing for war. It was a terrifying time. It was before the demise of the Soviet Union. And nuclear testing was just part of that big picture where people were preparing for war.

    “I think that the wonderful development in New Zealand was that people knew enough to know that we didn’t want to be defended by nuclear weapons because that was not mutually assured survival — it was mutually assured destruction.”

    New Zealand took a stand, Clark said, but taking that stand led to the attack on the Rainbow Warrior in Auckland harbour by French state-backed terrorism where tragically Greenpeace photographer Fernando Pereira lost his life.

    “I remember I was on my way to Nairobi for a conference for women, and I was in Zimbabwe, when the news came through about the bombing of a boat in Auckland harbour.

    ‘Absolutely shocking’
    “It was absolutely shocking, we had never experienced such a thing. I recall when I returned to New Zealand, [Prime Minister] David Lange one morning striding down to the party caucus room and telling us before it went public that it was without question that French spies had planted the bombs and the rest was history.

    “It was a very tense time. Full marks to Greenpeace for keeping up the struggle for so long — long before it was a mainstream issue Greenpeace was out there in the Pacific taking on nuclear testing.

    “Different times from today, but when I wrote the foreword for David’s book I noted that storm clouds were gathering again around nuclear weapons and issues. I suppose that there is so much else going on in a tragic 24 news cycle — catastrophe day in and day out in Gaza, severe technology and lethal weapons in Ukraine killing people, wherever you look there are so many conflicts.

    “The international agreements that we have relied are falling into disrepair. For example, if I were in Europe I would be extremely worried about the demise of the intermediate range missile weapons pact which has now been abandoned by the Americans and the Russians.

    “And that governs the deployment of medium range missiles in Europe.

    “The New Start Treaty, which was a nuclear arms control treaty between what was the Soviet Union and the US expires next year. Will it be renegotiated in the current circumstances? Who knows?”

    With the Non-proliferation Treaty, there are acknowledged nuclear powers who had not signed the treaty — “and those that do make very little effort to live up to the aspiration, which is to negotiate an end to nuclear weapons”.

    Developments with Iran
    “We have seen recently the latest developments with Iran, and for all of Iran’s many sins let us acknowledge that it is a party to the Non-Proliferation Treaty,” she said.

    “It did subject itself, for the most part, to the inspections regime. Israel, which bombed it, is not a party to the treaty, and doesn’t accept inspections.

    “There are so many double standards that people have long complained about the Non-Proliferation Treaty where the original five nuclear powers are deemed okay to have them, somehow, whereas there are others who don’t join at all.

    “And then over the Ukraine conflict we have seen worrying threats of the use of nuclear weapons.”

    Clark warned that we the use of artificial intelligence it would not be long before asking it: “How do I make a nuclear weapon?”

    “It’s not so difficult to make a dirty bomb. So we should be extremely worried about all these developments.”

    Then Clark spoke about the “complications” facing New Zealand.

    Mangareva researcher and advocate Ena Manuireva . . . “My mum died of lung cancer and the doctors said that she was a ‘passive smoker’. My mum had not smoked for the last 65 years.” Image: Asia Pacific Report

    Teariki’s message to De Gaulle
    In his address, Ena Manuireva started off by quoting the late Tahitian parliamentarian John Teariki who had courageously appealed to General Charles De Gaulle in 1966 after France had already tested three nuclear devices:

    “No government has ever had the honesty or the cynical frankness to admit that its nuclear tests might be dangerous. No government has ever hesitated to make other peoples — preferably small, defenceless ones — bear the burden.”

    “May you, Mr President, take back your troops, your bombs, and your planes.

    “Then, later, our leukemia and cancer patients would not be able to accuse you of being the cause of their illness.

    “Then, our future generations would not be able to blame you for the birth of monsters and deformed children.

    “Then, you would give the world an example worthy of France . . .

    “Then, Polynesia, united, would be proud and happy to be French, and, as in the early days of Free France, we would all once again become your best and most loyal friends.”

    ‘Emotional moment’
    Manuireva said that 10 days earlier, he had been on board Rainbow Warrior III for the ceremony to mark the bombing in 1985 that cost the life of Fernando Pereira – “and the lives of a lot of Mā’ohi people”.

    “It was a very emotional moment for me. It reminded me of my mother and father as I am a descendant of those on Mangareva atoll who were contaminated by those nuclear tests.

    “My mum died of lung cancer and the doctors said that she was a ‘passive smoker’. My mum had not smoked for the last 65 years.

    “French nuclear testing started on 2 July 1966 with Aldebaran and lasted 30 years.”

    He spoke about how the military “top brass fled the island” when winds start blowing towards Mangareva. “Food was ready but they didn’t stay”.

    “By the time I was born in December 1967 in Mangareva, France had already exploded 9 atmospheric nuclear tests on Moruroa and Fangataufa atolls, about 400km from Mangareva.”

    France’s most powerful explosion was Canopus with 2.6 megatonnes in August 1968. It was a thermonuclear hydrogen bomb — 150 times more powerful than Hiroshima.

    Greenpeace Aotearoa executive director Russel Norman . . . a positive of the campaign future. Image: Asia Pacific Report

    ‘Poisoned gift’
    Manuireva said that by France “gifting us the bomb”, Tahitians had been left “with all the ongoing consequences on the people’s health costs that the Ma’ohi Nui government is paying for”.

    He described how the compensation programme was inadequate, lengthy and complicated.

    Manuireva also spoke about the consequences for the environment. Both Moruroa and Fangataufa were condemned as “no go” zones and islanders had lost their lands forever.

    He also noted that while France had gifted the former headquarters of the Atomic Energy Commission (CEP) as a “form of reconciliation” plans to turn it into a museum were thwarted because the building was “rife with asbestos”.

    “It is a poisonous gift that will cost millions for the local government to fix.”

    Greenpeace Aotearoa executive director Russel Norman spoke of the impact on the Greenpeace organisation of the French secret service bombing of their ship and also introduced the guest speakers and responded to their statements.

    A Q and A session was also held to round off the stimulating evening.

    A question during the open mike session on board the Rainbow Warrior. Image: Asia Pacific Report

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

  • MIL-Evening Report: Keep fighting for a nuclear-free Pacific, Helen Clark warns Greenpeace over global storm clouds

    Asia Pacific Report

    Former New Zealand prime minister Helen Clark warned activists and campaigners in a speech on the deck of the Greenpeace environmental flagship Rainbow Warrior III last night to be wary of global “storm clouds” and the renewed existential threat of nuclear weapons.

    Speaking on her reflections on four decades after the bombing of the original Rainbow Warrior on 10 July 1985, she said that New Zealand had a lot to be proud of but the world was now in a “precarious” state.

    Clark praised Greenpeace over its long struggle, challenging the global campaigners to keep up the fight for a nuclear-free Pacific.

    “For New Zealand, having been proudly nuclear-free since the mid-1980s, life has got a lot more complicated for us as well, and I have done a lot of campaigning against New Zealand signing up to any aspect of the AUKUS arrangement because it seems to me that being associated with any agreement that supplies nuclear ship technology to Australia is more or less encouraging the development of nuclear threats in the South Pacific,” she said.

    “While I am not suggesting that Australians are about to put nuclear weapons on them, we know that others do. This is not the Pacific that we want.

    “It is not the Pacific that we fought for going back all those years.

    “So we need to be very concerned about these storm clouds gathering.”

    Lessons for humanity
    Clark was prime minister 1999-2008 and served as a minister in David Lange’s Labour government that passed New Zealand’s nuclear-free legislation in 1987 – two years after the Rainbow Warrior bombing by French secret agents.

    She was also head of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) in 2009-2017.

    “When you think 40 years on, humanity might have learned some lessons. But it seems we have to repeat the lessons over and over again, or we will be dragged on the path of re-engagement with those who use nuclear weapons as their ultimate defence,” Clark told the Greenpeace activists, crew and guests.

    “Forty years on, we look back with a lot of pride, actually, at how New Zealand responded to the bombing of the Rainbow Warrior. We stood up with the passage of the nuclear-free legislation in 1987, we stood up with a lot of things.

    “All of this is under threat; the international scene now is quite precarious with respect to nuclear weapons. This is an existential threat.”


    Nuclear-free Pacific reflections with Helen Clark         Video: Greenpeace

    In response to Tahitian researcher and advocate Ena Manuireva who spoke earlier about the legacy of a health crisis as a result of 30 years of French nuclear tests at Moruroa and Fangataufa, she recalled her own thoughts.

    “It reminds us of why we were so motivated to fight for a nuclear-free Pacific because we remember the history of what happened in French Polynesia, in the Marshall Islands, in the South Australian desert, at Maralinga, to the New Zealand servicemen who were sent up in the navy ships, the Rotoiti and the Pukaki, in the late 1950s, to stand on deck while the British exploded their bombs [at Christmas Island in what is today Kiribati].

    “These poor guys were still seeking compensation when I was PM with the illnesses you [Ena] described in French Polynesia.

    Former NZ prime minister Helen Clark . . . “I remember one of the slogans in the 1970s and 1980s was ‘if it is so safe, test them in France’.” Image: Asia Pacific Report

    Testing ground for ‘others’
    “So the Pacific was a testing ground for ‘others’ far away and I remember one of the slogans in the 1970s and 1980s was ‘if it is so safe, test them in France’. Right? It wasn’t so safe.

    “Mind you, they regarded French Polynesia as France.

    “David Robie asked me to write the foreword to the new edition of his book, Eyes of Fire: The Last Voyage and Legacy of the Rainbow Warrior, and it brought back so many memories of those times because those of you who are my age will remember that the 1980s were the peak of the Cold War.

    “We had the Reagan administration [in the US] that was actively preparing for war. It was a terrifying time. It was before the demise of the Soviet Union. And nuclear testing was just part of that big picture where people were preparing for war.

    “I think that the wonderful development in New Zealand was that people knew enough to know that we didn’t want to be defended by nuclear weapons because that was not mutually assured survival — it was mutually assured destruction.”

    New Zealand took a stand, Clark said, but taking that stand led to the attack on the Rainbow Warrior in Auckland harbour by French state-backed terrorism where tragically Greenpeace photographer Fernando Pereira lost his life.

    “I remember I was on my way to Nairobi for a conference for women, and I was in Zimbabwe, when the news came through about the bombing of a boat in Auckland harbour.

    ‘Absolutely shocking’
    “It was absolutely shocking, we had never experienced such a thing. I recall when I returned to New Zealand, [Prime Minister] David Lange one morning striding down to the party caucus room and telling us before it went public that it was without question that French spies had planted the bombs and the rest was history.

    “It was a very tense time. Full marks to Greenpeace for keeping up the struggle for so long — long before it was a mainstream issue Greenpeace was out there in the Pacific taking on nuclear testing.

    “Different times from today, but when I wrote the foreword for David’s book I noted that storm clouds were gathering again around nuclear weapons and issues. I suppose that there is so much else going on in a tragic 24 news cycle — catastrophe day in and day out in Gaza, severe technology and lethal weapons in Ukraine killing people, wherever you look there are so many conflicts.

    “The international agreements that we have relied are falling into disrepair. For example, if I were in Europe I would be extremely worried about the demise of the intermediate range missile weapons pact which has now been abandoned by the Americans and the Russians.

    “And that governs the deployment of medium range missiles in Europe.

    “The New Start Treaty, which was a nuclear arms control treaty between what was the Soviet Union and the US expires next year. Will it be renegotiated in the current circumstances? Who knows?”

    With the Non-proliferation Treaty, there are acknowledged nuclear powers who had not signed the treaty — “and those that do make very little effort to live up to the aspiration, which is to negotiate an end to nuclear weapons”.

    Developments with Iran
    “We have seen recently the latest developments with Iran, and for all of Iran’s many sins let us acknowledge that it is a party to the Non-Proliferation Treaty,” she said.

    “It did subject itself, for the most part, to the inspections regime. Israel, which bombed it, is not a party to the treaty, and doesn’t accept inspections.

    “There are so many double standards that people have long complained about the Non-Proliferation Treaty where the original five nuclear powers are deemed okay to have them, somehow, whereas there are others who don’t join at all.

    “And then over the Ukraine conflict we have seen worrying threats of the use of nuclear weapons.”

    Clark warned that we the use of artificial intelligence it would not be long before asking it: “How do I make a nuclear weapon?”

    “It’s not so difficult to make a dirty bomb. So we should be extremely worried about all these developments.”

    Then Clark spoke about the “complications” facing New Zealand.

    Mangareva researcher and advocate Ena Manuireva . . . “My mum died of lung cancer and the doctors said that she was a ‘passive smoker’. My mum had not smoked for the last 65 years.” Image: Asia Pacific Report

    Teariki’s message to De Gaulle
    In his address, Ena Manuireva started off by quoting the late Tahitian parliamentarian John Teariki who had courageously appealed to General Charles De Gaulle in 1966 after France had already tested three nuclear devices:

    “No government has ever had the honesty or the cynical frankness to admit that its nuclear tests might be dangerous. No government has ever hesitated to make other peoples — preferably small, defenceless ones — bear the burden.”

    “May you, Mr President, take back your troops, your bombs, and your planes.

    “Then, later, our leukemia and cancer patients would not be able to accuse you of being the cause of their illness.

    “Then, our future generations would not be able to blame you for the birth of monsters and deformed children.

    “Then, you would give the world an example worthy of France . . .

    “Then, Polynesia, united, would be proud and happy to be French, and, as in the early days of Free France, we would all once again become your best and most loyal friends.”

    ‘Emotional moment’
    Manuireva said that 10 days earlier, he had been on board Rainbow Warrior III for the ceremony to mark the bombing in 1985 that cost the life of Fernando Pereira – “and the lives of a lot of Mā’ohi people”.

    “It was a very emotional moment for me. It reminded me of my mother and father as I am a descendant of those on Mangareva atoll who were contaminated by those nuclear tests.

    “My mum died of lung cancer and the doctors said that she was a ‘passive smoker’. My mum had not smoked for the last 65 years.

    “French nuclear testing started on 2 July 1966 with Aldebaran and lasted 30 years.”

    He spoke about how the military “top brass fled the island” when winds start blowing towards Mangareva. “Food was ready but they didn’t stay”.

    “By the time I was born in December 1967 in Mangareva, France had already exploded 9 atmospheric nuclear tests on Moruroa and Fangataufa atolls, about 400km from Mangareva.”

    France’s most powerful explosion was Canopus with 2.6 megatonnes in August 1968. It was a thermonuclear hydrogen bomb — 150 times more powerful than Hiroshima.

    Greenpeace Aotearoa executive director Russel Norman . . . a positive of the campaign future. Image: Asia Pacific Report

    ‘Poisoned gift’
    Manuireva said that by France “gifting us the bomb”, Tahitians had been left “with all the ongoing consequences on the people’s health costs that the Ma’ohi Nui government is paying for”.

    He described how the compensation programme was inadequate, lengthy and complicated.

    Manuireva also spoke about the consequences for the environment. Both Moruroa and Fangataufa were condemned as “no go” zones and islanders had lost their lands forever.

    He also noted that while France had gifted the former headquarters of the Atomic Energy Commission (CEP) as a “form of reconciliation” plans to turn it into a museum were thwarted because the building was “rife with asbestos”.

    “It is a poisonous gift that will cost millions for the local government to fix.”

    Greenpeace Aotearoa executive director Russel Norman spoke of the impact on the Greenpeace organisation of the French secret service bombing of their ship and also introduced the guest speakers and responded to their statements.

    A Q and A session was also held to round off the stimulating evening.

    A question during the open mike session on board the Rainbow Warrior. Image: Asia Pacific Report

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

  • MIL-OSI Submissions: What makes a person cool? Global study has some answers

    Source: The Conversation – Africa – By Todd Pezzuti, Associate Professor, Business School, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez

    From Lagos to Cape Town, Santiago to Seoul, people want to be cool. “Cool” is a word we hear everywhere – in music, in fashion, on social media. We use it to describe certain types of people.

    But what exactly makes someone cool? Is it just about being popular or trendy? Or is there something deeper going on?

    In a recent study I conducted with other marketing professors, we set out to answer a simple but surprisingly unexplored question. What are the personality traits and values that make someone seem cool – and do they differ across cultures?

    We asked nearly 6,000 people from 12 countries to think of someone they personally knew who was “cool”, “not cool”, “good”, or “not good”. Then we asked them to describe that person’s traits and values using validated psychological measures. We used this data to examine how coolness differs from general likeability or morality.



    Read more:
    What makes a person seem wise? Global study finds that cultures do differ – but not as much as you’d think

    The countries ranged from Australia to Turkey, the US to Germany, India to China, Nigeria to South Africa.

    Our data showed that coolness is uniquely associated with the same six traits around the world: cool people tend to be extroverted, hedonistic, adventurous, open, powerful, and autonomous.

    These findings help settle a long debate about what it means to be cool today.

    A brief history of cool

    Early writing on coolness described it as emotional restraint: being calm, composed and unbothered. This view, rooted in the metaphor of temperature and emotion, saw coolness as a sign of self-control and mastery.

    Some of these scholars trace this form of cool to slavery and segregation, where emotional restraint was a survival strategy among enslaved Africans and their descendants, symbolising autonomy and dignity in the face of oppression. Others propose “cool” restraint existed long before slavery.

    Regardless, jazz musicians in the 1940s first helped popularise this cool persona – relaxed, emotionally contained, and stylish – an image later embraced by youth and various countercultures. Corporations like Nike, Apple and MTV commercialised cool, turning a countercultural attitude into a more commercially friendly global aesthetic.

    This is what makes someone cool

    Our findings suggest that the meaning of cool has changed. It’s a way to identify and label people with a specific psychological profile.

    Cool people are outgoing and social (extroverted). They seek pleasure and enjoyment (hedonistic). They take risks and try new things (adventurous). They are curious and open to new experiences (open). They have influence or charisma (powerful). And perhaps most of all, they do things their own way (autonomous).

    This finding held remarkably steady across countries. Whether you’re in the US, South Korea, Spain or South Africa, people tend to think that cool individuals have this same “cool profile”.

    We also found that even though coolness overlaps with being good or favourable, being cool and being good are not the same. Being kind, calm, traditional, secure and conscientious were more associated with being good than cool. Some “cool” traits were not necessarily good at all, like extroversion and hedonism.

    What about South Africa and Nigeria?

    One of the most fascinating aspects of our study was seeing how consistent the meaning of coolness was across cultures – even in countries with very different traditions and values.

    In South Africa, participants viewed cool people as extroverted, hedonistic, powerful, adventurous, open and autonomous – just like participants from Europe to Asia. In South Africa, however, coolness is especially distinct from being good. South Africa is one of the countries in which being hedonistic, powerful, adventurous and autonomous was much more cool than good.



    Read more:
    Which African countries are flourishing? Scientists have a new way of measuring well-being

    Nigeria was the only country in which cool and uncool people were equally autonomous. So basically, individuality wasn’t seen as cool. That difference might reflect cultural values that place a greater emphasis on community, respect for elders, or collective identity. In places where tradition and hierarchy matter, doing your own thing might not be cool.

    Social sciences, like all science, however, are not perfect. So, it’s reasonable to speculate that autonomy might still be cool in Nigeria, with the discrepancy resulting from methodological issues such as how the Nigerian participants interpreted and responded to the survey.

    Nigeria was also unique because the distinction between cool and good wasn’t as notable as in other countries. So coolness was seen more as goodness than in the other countries.

    Why does this matter?

    The fact that so many cultures agree on what makes someone cool suggests that “coolness” may serve a shared social function. The traits that make people cool may make them more likely to try new things, innovate new styles and fashions, and influence others. These individuals often push boundaries and introduce new ideas – in fashion, art, politics, or technology. They inspire others and help shape what’s seen as modern, desirable, or forward-thinking.

    Coolness, in this sense, might function as a kind of cultural status marker – a reward for being bold, open-minded and innovative. It’s not just about surface style. It’s about signalling that you’re ahead of the curve, and that others should pay attention.

    So what can we learn from this?

    For one, young people in South Africa, Nigeria, and around the world may have more in common than we often think. Despite vast cultural differences, they tend to admire the same traits. That opens up interesting possibilities for cross-cultural communication, collaboration and influence.

    Second, if we want to connect with or inspire others – whether through education, branding, or leadership – it helps to understand what people see as cool. Coolness may not be a universal virtue, but it is a universal currency.

    And finally, there’s something reassuring in all this: coolness is not about being famous or rich. It’s about how you live. Are you curious? Courageous? True to yourself? If so, chances are someone out there thinks you’re cool – no matter where you’re from.

    Todd Pezzuti received funding from ANID Chile to conduct this research.

    – ref. What makes a person cool? Global study has some answers – https://theconversation.com/what-makes-a-person-cool-global-study-has-some-answers-261266

    MIL OSI –

  • MIL-OSI Submissions: What makes a person cool? Global study has some answers

    Source: The Conversation – Africa – By Todd Pezzuti, Associate Professor, Business School, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez

    From Lagos to Cape Town, Santiago to Seoul, people want to be cool. “Cool” is a word we hear everywhere – in music, in fashion, on social media. We use it to describe certain types of people.

    But what exactly makes someone cool? Is it just about being popular or trendy? Or is there something deeper going on?

    In a recent study I conducted with other marketing professors, we set out to answer a simple but surprisingly unexplored question. What are the personality traits and values that make someone seem cool – and do they differ across cultures?

    We asked nearly 6,000 people from 12 countries to think of someone they personally knew who was “cool”, “not cool”, “good”, or “not good”. Then we asked them to describe that person’s traits and values using validated psychological measures. We used this data to examine how coolness differs from general likeability or morality.



    Read more:
    What makes a person seem wise? Global study finds that cultures do differ – but not as much as you’d think

    The countries ranged from Australia to Turkey, the US to Germany, India to China, Nigeria to South Africa.

    Our data showed that coolness is uniquely associated with the same six traits around the world: cool people tend to be extroverted, hedonistic, adventurous, open, powerful, and autonomous.

    These findings help settle a long debate about what it means to be cool today.

    A brief history of cool

    Early writing on coolness described it as emotional restraint: being calm, composed and unbothered. This view, rooted in the metaphor of temperature and emotion, saw coolness as a sign of self-control and mastery.

    Some of these scholars trace this form of cool to slavery and segregation, where emotional restraint was a survival strategy among enslaved Africans and their descendants, symbolising autonomy and dignity in the face of oppression. Others propose “cool” restraint existed long before slavery.

    Regardless, jazz musicians in the 1940s first helped popularise this cool persona – relaxed, emotionally contained, and stylish – an image later embraced by youth and various countercultures. Corporations like Nike, Apple and MTV commercialised cool, turning a countercultural attitude into a more commercially friendly global aesthetic.

    This is what makes someone cool

    Our findings suggest that the meaning of cool has changed. It’s a way to identify and label people with a specific psychological profile.

    Cool people are outgoing and social (extroverted). They seek pleasure and enjoyment (hedonistic). They take risks and try new things (adventurous). They are curious and open to new experiences (open). They have influence or charisma (powerful). And perhaps most of all, they do things their own way (autonomous).

    This finding held remarkably steady across countries. Whether you’re in the US, South Korea, Spain or South Africa, people tend to think that cool individuals have this same “cool profile”.

    We also found that even though coolness overlaps with being good or favourable, being cool and being good are not the same. Being kind, calm, traditional, secure and conscientious were more associated with being good than cool. Some “cool” traits were not necessarily good at all, like extroversion and hedonism.

    What about South Africa and Nigeria?

    One of the most fascinating aspects of our study was seeing how consistent the meaning of coolness was across cultures – even in countries with very different traditions and values.

    In South Africa, participants viewed cool people as extroverted, hedonistic, powerful, adventurous, open and autonomous – just like participants from Europe to Asia. In South Africa, however, coolness is especially distinct from being good. South Africa is one of the countries in which being hedonistic, powerful, adventurous and autonomous was much more cool than good.



    Read more:
    Which African countries are flourishing? Scientists have a new way of measuring well-being

    Nigeria was the only country in which cool and uncool people were equally autonomous. So basically, individuality wasn’t seen as cool. That difference might reflect cultural values that place a greater emphasis on community, respect for elders, or collective identity. In places where tradition and hierarchy matter, doing your own thing might not be cool.

    Social sciences, like all science, however, are not perfect. So, it’s reasonable to speculate that autonomy might still be cool in Nigeria, with the discrepancy resulting from methodological issues such as how the Nigerian participants interpreted and responded to the survey.

    Nigeria was also unique because the distinction between cool and good wasn’t as notable as in other countries. So coolness was seen more as goodness than in the other countries.

    Why does this matter?

    The fact that so many cultures agree on what makes someone cool suggests that “coolness” may serve a shared social function. The traits that make people cool may make them more likely to try new things, innovate new styles and fashions, and influence others. These individuals often push boundaries and introduce new ideas – in fashion, art, politics, or technology. They inspire others and help shape what’s seen as modern, desirable, or forward-thinking.

    Coolness, in this sense, might function as a kind of cultural status marker – a reward for being bold, open-minded and innovative. It’s not just about surface style. It’s about signalling that you’re ahead of the curve, and that others should pay attention.

    So what can we learn from this?

    For one, young people in South Africa, Nigeria, and around the world may have more in common than we often think. Despite vast cultural differences, they tend to admire the same traits. That opens up interesting possibilities for cross-cultural communication, collaboration and influence.

    Second, if we want to connect with or inspire others – whether through education, branding, or leadership – it helps to understand what people see as cool. Coolness may not be a universal virtue, but it is a universal currency.

    And finally, there’s something reassuring in all this: coolness is not about being famous or rich. It’s about how you live. Are you curious? Courageous? True to yourself? If so, chances are someone out there thinks you’re cool – no matter where you’re from.

    Todd Pezzuti received funding from ANID Chile to conduct this research.

    – ref. What makes a person cool? Global study has some answers – https://theconversation.com/what-makes-a-person-cool-global-study-has-some-answers-261266

    MIL OSI –

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Interdependent relationship checklist

    Source: New places to play in Gungahlin

    Things to consider when applying

    This checklist will assist you to collect the required documents to support your compassionate release of super application, which may reduce delays, or your application not being approved.

    Accessing super early can have significant financial impacts and should be a last resort. You need to read the information on our website before using this checklist as it contains more detailed information about:

    Important to note

    If you borrowed money to pay for your or your dependant’s expenses, you may still be eligible. You will need to provide additional documents regarding the borrowed amount as part of your application.

    Evidence required to support your application

    The following items can be supplied as evidence:

    1. utility bill in both your and the other person’s names (or other documents, for example, bank statements) to confirm you live together at the same address
    2. bank statements (or other documents for example, receipts) from either you or the other person, showing the financial support provided
    3. statutory declaration from yourself that includes information supporting you have a close personal relationship with the other person and that includes examples of the domestic support and personal care one or each of you provide the other.

    Note: All documents need to show who they were issued to. Where you are providing bank statements, you need to ensure that the account holder’s name and statement period are visible.

    See Statutory declarations for information on how to access and complete the declaration.

    Information to consider

    Evidence of financial support can include payments between you and the other person or the payment of expenses on their behalf, such as utility bills, rent, groceries.

    Information that can support you have a close personal relationship includes:

    • nature of the relationship
    • duration of the relationship
    • details of assets that are jointly owned
    • any information that suggests the relationship is permanent
    • public aspects of the relationship.

    Information that demonstrates that you support the other person, and provided domestic support and personal care includes:

    • domestic support and personal care provided
    • care and support of children
    • details of the emotional support you provide each other.

    If you would like to print this checklist, select ‘Print or Download’ and ‘Print page’ from the dropdown list.

    MIL OSI News –

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Interdependent relationship checklist

    Source: New places to play in Gungahlin

    Things to consider when applying

    This checklist will assist you to collect the required documents to support your compassionate release of super application, which may reduce delays, or your application not being approved.

    Accessing super early can have significant financial impacts and should be a last resort. You need to read the information on our website before using this checklist as it contains more detailed information about:

    Important to note

    If you borrowed money to pay for your or your dependant’s expenses, you may still be eligible. You will need to provide additional documents regarding the borrowed amount as part of your application.

    Evidence required to support your application

    The following items can be supplied as evidence:

    1. utility bill in both your and the other person’s names (or other documents, for example, bank statements) to confirm you live together at the same address
    2. bank statements (or other documents for example, receipts) from either you or the other person, showing the financial support provided
    3. statutory declaration from yourself that includes information supporting you have a close personal relationship with the other person and that includes examples of the domestic support and personal care one or each of you provide the other.

    Note: All documents need to show who they were issued to. Where you are providing bank statements, you need to ensure that the account holder’s name and statement period are visible.

    See Statutory declarations for information on how to access and complete the declaration.

    Information to consider

    Evidence of financial support can include payments between you and the other person or the payment of expenses on their behalf, such as utility bills, rent, groceries.

    Information that can support you have a close personal relationship includes:

    • nature of the relationship
    • duration of the relationship
    • details of assets that are jointly owned
    • any information that suggests the relationship is permanent
    • public aspects of the relationship.

    Information that demonstrates that you support the other person, and provided domestic support and personal care includes:

    • domestic support and personal care provided
    • care and support of children
    • details of the emotional support you provide each other.

    If you would like to print this checklist, select ‘Print or Download’ and ‘Print page’ from the dropdown list.

    MIL OSI News –

  • MIL-OSI Australia: ATO warns businesses against falsifying their GST claims

    Source: New places to play in Gungahlin

    The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) is sending a clear message to businesses considering committing GST fraud, making dishonest claims and falsifying invoices.

    Assistant Commissioner Adam O’Grady said the fraud is currently predominantly within the property and construction industry. We’ve also identified early signs of it proliferating in other industries, particularly by privately owned and wealthy groups.

    ‘Despite warnings from the Serious Financial Crime Taskforce late last year, recent observations show dishonest claims involving false invoicing are growing.’

    This is not related to a GST fraud scheme that was promoted through social media where individuals created fake businesses and lodged BAS statements to obtain GST refunds. These are real businesses creating disingenuous invoices to gain overinflated GST refunds.

    ‘While the numbers of businesses involved are relatively small, some are attempting to claim tens of millions of dollars in GST refunds they’re not entitled to,’ Mr O’Grady said.

    We’ve released Taxpayer Alert TA 2025/2: Arrangements designed to improperly obtain GST refunds to put businesses engaging in these concerning arrangements on notice and to warn businesses not to engage in these types of arrangements.

    ‘Most businesses do the right thing. What these others are doing is simply not fair. We’re dealing with dishonest and deliberate attempts to cheat the tax system.’

    ‘We will not tolerate this fraudulent behaviour deliberately undermining the system or providing an unfair advantage over honest businesses.’

    ‘Those involved will face consequences, including interest charges, penalties, fines, and where appropriate, prosecution, or referral to the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecution,’ Mr O’Grady said.

    We see arrangements where a business colludes with another related business to create a false invoice, in an attempt to justify an overly inflated GST refund. These may be:

    • entities claiming GST credits for the development and construction costs of industrial buildings that never occurred
    • entities claiming GST credits for intangible services such as ‘management fees’ that were never provided
    • entities claiming GST credits for property acquisitions before they occurred
    • multiple entities claiming GST credits for the same invoice
    • in the worst cases, invoices that are completely fictitious.

    ‘Often these schemes are dressed up and sold as clever schemes with a figleaf of technical analysis – but any scheme which generates GST refunds through paper shuffling is likely to be ineffective at best, and civilly and criminally actionable fraud at worst. If it’s too good to be true, it probably is.’

    ‘We’re encouraging employees, businesses, industry groups and the community to demonstrate their lack of tolerance for those doing the wrong thing, by helping us stamp out this behaviour.’

    ‘GST revenue is vital to Australia’s economy, funding essential services delivered by states and territories.’

    ‘Those involved are abusing the system, tarnishing the reputation of the property and construction industry and making it harder for compliant businesses to operate.’

    If you suspect another business of being involved in these arrangements, you can confidentially report to us by making a tip-off online or by calling 1800 060 062. 

    If you’re involved, you should come forward and make a voluntary disclosure rather than wait for the ATO to contact you. Early cooperation and making a voluntary disclosure may reduce the penalties imposed.  

    Notes to journalists

    MIL OSI News –

  • MIL-OSI Australia: New taxpayer alert warns about GST refund fraud

    Source: New places to play in Gungahlin

    We’ve now published a new taxpayer alert – TA 2025/2: Arrangements designed to improperly obtain goods and services tax refunds. This alert strongly warns businesses against using arrangements where a business colludes with another related business to create fraudulent invoices, so they can attempt to claim large GST refunds. In many cases the invoice will overclaim GST credits on real goods or services that were provided. In the worst cases, invoices are completely fictitious.

    Deliberately exploiting the GST system to obtain a refund you’re not entitled to, or to avoid payment, is a criminal offence.

    We’re still seeing these arrangements occurring, despite warnings from the Serious Financial Crime Taskforce over the last 18 months about fraudulent GST refunds and false invoicing.

    Our data shows that the fraud is currently predominantly within the property and construction industry. We’ve also identified early signs of it proliferating in other industries, particularly by privately owned and wealthy groups.

    It’s a small number of businesses that are attempting to do this. However, they’re trying to fraudulently claim tens of millions of dollars – money that should instead be supporting vital services the Australian community relies on. Their behaviour:

    • disadvantages the vast majority of Australian businesses that are doing the right thing
    • tarnishes the reputation of the industries where those businesses operate
    • undermines the tax system.

    This is not related to the GST fraud scheme that was promoted through social media where individuals created fake businesses and lodged BAS statements to obtain GST refunds. These are real businesses creating fraudulent invoices to try to gain overinflated GST refunds.

    We’re equipped with resources, sophisticated data matching and analytics capabilities, and intelligence-sharing relationships to uncover even the most elaborate financial crime. Any businesses caught in these arrangements will face the full force of the law. Further:

    • If you’re a company director, you’re responsible for ensuring the company pays its GST in full and by the due date. If these obligations are not met, you can become personally liable for director penalties.
    • Promoter penalty laws may apply to any registered agent and adviser who promotes these arrangements. In some instances, cases will be pursued as criminal matters. The worst cases may result in imprisonment.

    What you can do

    We’re encouraging honest businesses, industry groups and the community to help us stamp out this behaviour. If you suspect another business of being involved in these arrangements, you can confidentially report to us by making a tip-off or by calling 1800 060 062.

    If you’re involved in a fraudulent arrangement, we strongly encourage you to come forward and make a voluntary disclosure rather than wait for us to contact you. If you cooperate early and make a voluntary disclosure, we may reduce the penalties imposed.

    Keep up to date

    We have tailored communication channels for medium, large and multinational businesses, to keep you up to date with updates and changes you need to know.

    Read more articles in our online Business bulletins newsroom.

    Subscribe to our free:

    • fortnightly Business bulletins email newsletterExternal Link
    • email notifications about new and updated information on our website – you can choose to receive updates relevant to your situation. Choose the ‘Business and organisations’ category to ensure your subscription includes notifications for more Business bulletins newsroom articles like this one.

    MIL OSI News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Pingree, Massie Introduce Bipartisan PRIME Act to Empower Local Livestock Farmers, Meet Consumer Demand

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congresswoman Chellie Pingree (1st District of Maine)

    Representatives Chellie Pingree (D-Maine) and Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) reintroduced the Processing Revival and Intrastate Meat Exemption (PRIME) Act, bipartisan legislation to make it easier for small farms and ranches to serve consumers. The PRIME Act (H.R. 4700) would give individual states freedom to permit intrastate distribution of custom-slaughtered meat such as beef, pork, or lamb to consumers, restaurants, hotels, boarding houses, and grocery stores. 

    “Consumers at the grocery store increasingly want quality, locally-grown food, but existing regulations and supply chain vulnerabilities don’t make it easy for them to access. In rural states like Maine, farmers often have to drive hundreds of miles just to get their livestock processed. We can and must do more to bolster our local food systems,” said Pingree, a longtime farmer and member of the House Agriculture Committee. “The PRIME Act is a commonsense, bipartisan solution that strengthens infrastructure for local meat processing, supports family farms, and gives consumers easier access to locally raised food—along with greater transparency about where that food comes from.”

    “Consumers want to know where their food comes from, what it contains, and how it’s processed. Yet federal inspection requirements make it difficult to purchase food from trusted, local farmers,” said Massie. “It is time to open our markets to give producers the freedom to succeed and consumers the freedom to choose.”

    Current law exempts custom slaughter of animals from federal inspection regulations, but only if the meat is slaughtered for personal, household, guest, and employee use (21 U.S.C. § 623(a)). This means that in order to sell individual cuts of locally raised meats to consumers, farmers and ranchers must first send their animals to one of a limited number of USDA-inspected slaughterhouses. These USDA-inspected slaughterhouses are sometimes hundreds of miles away from farms and ranches, adding substantial transportation costs and increasing the chances of locally raised meat co-mingling with industrially produced meat. The PRIME Act would expand the current custom exemption and allow small farms, ranches, and slaughterhouses to thrive.

    Original co-sponsors of the PRIME Act include: Rep. Jodey Arrington (R-Texas), Rep. Michael Baumgartner (R-Wash.), Rep. Andy Biggs (R-Ariz.), Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.), Rep. Josh Brecheen (R-Okla.), Rep. Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.), Rep. Eric Burlison (R-Mo.), Rep. John Carter (R-Texas), Rep. Ben Cline (R-Va.), Rep. Michael Cloud (R-Texas), Rep. Andrew Clyde (R-Ga.), Rep. Warren Davidson (R-Ohio), Rep. Byron Donalds (R-Fla.), Rep. Brandon Gill (R-Texas), Rep. Jared Golden (D-Maine), Rep. Paul Gosar (R-Ariz.), Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.), Rep. Glenn Grothman (R-Wisc.), Rep. Harriet Hageman (R-Wyo.), Rep. Diana Harshbarger (R-Tenn.), Rep. Jared Huffman (D-Calif.), Rep. Laurel Lee (R-Fla.), Rep. Teresa Leger Fernandez (D-N.M.), Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.), Rep. Celeste Maloy (R-Utah), Rep. Tom McClintock (R-Calif.), Rep. Mary Miller (R-Ill.), Rep. Cory Mills (R-Fla.), Rep. Blake Moore (R-Utah), Rep. Troy Nehls (R-Texas), Rep. Andy Ogles (R-Tenn.), Rep. Burgess Owens (R-Utah), Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.), Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas), Rep. Maria Salazar (R-Fla.), Rep. Keith Self (R-Texas), Rep. Lloyd Smucker (R-Pa.), Rep. Victoria Spartz (R-Ind.), Rep. Tom Tiffany (R-Wisc.), Rep. Jill Tokuda (D-Hawaii), and Rep. David Valadao (R-Calif.). 

    Companion legislation, S.2409, has been introduced in the United States Senate by Senators Angus King (I-Maine) and Rand Paul (R-Ky.).

    Massie raises cattle on his off-the-grid farm in northeast Kentucky. Pingree raises grass-fed beef and chickens on her island farm in North Haven, Maine.

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Representatives Massie and Pingree Introduce Bipartisan PRIME Act to Empower Local Livestock Farmers, Meet Consumer Demand

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Thomas Massie (4th District of Kentucky)

    For Immediate Release

    Contact:

    John Kennedy, 202-225-3465 (Massie)
    Gabrielle Mannino, 207-509-5904 (Pingree)


    Washington, D.C    .- Representative Thomas Massie (R-KY) and Representative Chellie Pingree (D-ME) announce the re-introduction of the PRIME (Processing Revival and Intrastate Meat Exemption) Act to make it easier for small farms and ranches to serve consumers. The PRIME Act (H.R. 4700) would give individual states freedom to permit intrastate distribution of custom-slaughtered meat such as beef, pork, or lamb to consumers, restaurants, hotels, boarding houses, and grocery stores. 

    “Consumers want to know where their food comes from, what it contains, and how it’s processed. Yet federal inspection requirements make it difficult to purchase food from trusted, local farmers,” said Rep. Thomas Massie. “It is time to open our markets to give producers the freedom to succeed and consumers the freedom to choose.”

     “Consumers at the grocery store increasingly want quality, locally-grown food, but existing regulations and supply chain vulnerabilities don’t make it easy for them to access. In rural states like Maine, farmers often have to drive hundreds of miles just to get their livestock processed. We can and must do more to bolster our local food systems,” said Rep. Chellie Pingree. “The PRIME Act is a commonsense, bipartisan solution that strengthens infrastructure for local meat processing, supports family farms, and gives consumers easier access to locally raised food—along with greater transparency about where that food comes from.”

    Current law exempts custom slaughter of animals from federal inspection regulations, but only if the meat is slaughtered for personal, household, guest, and employee use (21 U.S.C. § 623(a)). This means that in order to sell individual cuts of locally raised meats to consumers, farmers and ranchers must first send their animals to one of a limited number of USDA-inspected slaughterhouses. These USDA-inspected slaughterhouses are sometimes hundreds of miles away from farms and ranches, adding substantial transportation costs and increasing the chances of locally raised meat co-mingling with industrially produced meat. The PRIME Act would expand the current custom exemption and allow small farms, ranches, and slaughterhouses to thrive.

    Original co-sponsors of the PRIME Act include: Rep. Jodey Arrington (R-TX), Rep. Michael Baumgartner (R-WA), Rep. Andy Biggs (R-AZ), Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-CO), Rep. Josh Brecheen (R-OK), Rep. Tim Burchett (R-TN), Rep. Eric Burlison (R-MO), Rep. John Carter (R-TX), Rep. Ben Cline (R-VA), Rep. Michael Cloud (R-TX), Rep. Andrew Clyde (R-GA), Rep. Warren Davidson (R-OH), Rep. Byron Donalds (R-FL), Rep. Brandon Gill (R-TX), Rep. Jared Golden (D-ME), Rep. Paul Gosar (R-AZ), Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA), Rep. Glenn Grothman (R-WI), Rep. Harriet Hageman (R-WY), Rep. Diana Harshbarger (R-TN), Rep. Jared Huffman (D-CA), Rep. Laurel Lee (R-FL), Rep. Teresa Leger Fernandez (D-NM), Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC), Rep. Celeste Maloy (R-UT), Rep. Tom McClintock (R-CA), Rep. Mary Miller (R-IL), Rep. Cory Mills (R-FL), Rep. Blake Moore (R-UT), Rep. Troy Nehls (R-TX), Rep. Andy Ogles (R-TN), Rep. Burgess Owens (R-UT), Rep. Scott Perry (R-PA), Rep. Chip Roy (R-TX), Rep. Maria Salazar (R-FL), Rep. Keith Self (R-TX), Rep. Lloyd Smucker (R-PA), Rep. Victoria Spartz (R-IN), Rep. Tom Tiffany (R-WI), Rep. Jill Tokuda (D-HI), and Rep. David Valadao (R-CA). 

    Companion legislation, S.2409, has been introduced in the United States Senate by Senators Angus King (I-ME) and Rand Paul (R-KY).

    Massie raises cattle on his off-the-grid farm in northeast Kentucky. Pingree raises grass-fed beef and chickens on her island farm in North Haven, Maine.

    The text of the PRIME Act is available at this link. 

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Representatives Massie and Pingree Introduce Bipartisan PRIME Act to Empower Local Livestock Farmers, Meet Consumer Demand

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Thomas Massie (4th District of Kentucky)

    For Immediate Release

    Contact:

    John Kennedy, 202-225-3465 (Massie)
    Gabrielle Mannino, 207-509-5904 (Pingree)


    Washington, D.C    .- Representative Thomas Massie (R-KY) and Representative Chellie Pingree (D-ME) announce the re-introduction of the PRIME (Processing Revival and Intrastate Meat Exemption) Act to make it easier for small farms and ranches to serve consumers. The PRIME Act (H.R. 4700) would give individual states freedom to permit intrastate distribution of custom-slaughtered meat such as beef, pork, or lamb to consumers, restaurants, hotels, boarding houses, and grocery stores. 

    “Consumers want to know where their food comes from, what it contains, and how it’s processed. Yet federal inspection requirements make it difficult to purchase food from trusted, local farmers,” said Rep. Thomas Massie. “It is time to open our markets to give producers the freedom to succeed and consumers the freedom to choose.”

     “Consumers at the grocery store increasingly want quality, locally-grown food, but existing regulations and supply chain vulnerabilities don’t make it easy for them to access. In rural states like Maine, farmers often have to drive hundreds of miles just to get their livestock processed. We can and must do more to bolster our local food systems,” said Rep. Chellie Pingree. “The PRIME Act is a commonsense, bipartisan solution that strengthens infrastructure for local meat processing, supports family farms, and gives consumers easier access to locally raised food—along with greater transparency about where that food comes from.”

    Current law exempts custom slaughter of animals from federal inspection regulations, but only if the meat is slaughtered for personal, household, guest, and employee use (21 U.S.C. § 623(a)). This means that in order to sell individual cuts of locally raised meats to consumers, farmers and ranchers must first send their animals to one of a limited number of USDA-inspected slaughterhouses. These USDA-inspected slaughterhouses are sometimes hundreds of miles away from farms and ranches, adding substantial transportation costs and increasing the chances of locally raised meat co-mingling with industrially produced meat. The PRIME Act would expand the current custom exemption and allow small farms, ranches, and slaughterhouses to thrive.

    Original co-sponsors of the PRIME Act include: Rep. Jodey Arrington (R-TX), Rep. Michael Baumgartner (R-WA), Rep. Andy Biggs (R-AZ), Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-CO), Rep. Josh Brecheen (R-OK), Rep. Tim Burchett (R-TN), Rep. Eric Burlison (R-MO), Rep. John Carter (R-TX), Rep. Ben Cline (R-VA), Rep. Michael Cloud (R-TX), Rep. Andrew Clyde (R-GA), Rep. Warren Davidson (R-OH), Rep. Byron Donalds (R-FL), Rep. Brandon Gill (R-TX), Rep. Jared Golden (D-ME), Rep. Paul Gosar (R-AZ), Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA), Rep. Glenn Grothman (R-WI), Rep. Harriet Hageman (R-WY), Rep. Diana Harshbarger (R-TN), Rep. Jared Huffman (D-CA), Rep. Laurel Lee (R-FL), Rep. Teresa Leger Fernandez (D-NM), Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC), Rep. Celeste Maloy (R-UT), Rep. Tom McClintock (R-CA), Rep. Mary Miller (R-IL), Rep. Cory Mills (R-FL), Rep. Blake Moore (R-UT), Rep. Troy Nehls (R-TX), Rep. Andy Ogles (R-TN), Rep. Burgess Owens (R-UT), Rep. Scott Perry (R-PA), Rep. Chip Roy (R-TX), Rep. Maria Salazar (R-FL), Rep. Keith Self (R-TX), Rep. Lloyd Smucker (R-PA), Rep. Victoria Spartz (R-IN), Rep. Tom Tiffany (R-WI), Rep. Jill Tokuda (D-HI), and Rep. David Valadao (R-CA). 

    Companion legislation, S.2409, has been introduced in the United States Senate by Senators Angus King (I-ME) and Rand Paul (R-KY).

    Massie raises cattle on his off-the-grid farm in northeast Kentucky. Pingree raises grass-fed beef and chickens on her island farm in North Haven, Maine.

    The text of the PRIME Act is available at this link. 

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI: Lloyds Bank plc: 2025 Half-Year Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    LONDON, July 24, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) —

    Lloyds Bank plc

    2025 Half-Year Results

    24 July 2025

    Member of the Lloyds Banking Group

    CONTENTS

    Forward-looking statements 1
       
    Statutory information (IFRS)  
    Condensed consolidated balance sheet (unaudited) 2
    Condensed consolidated income statement (unaudited) 2
       
    Financial review 3
       
    Risk management  
    Principal risks and uncertainties 5
    Capital risk 6
    Credit risk 10
    Liquidity risk 20
       
    Statutory information  
    Condensed consolidated half-year financial statements (unaudited) 21
    Condensed consolidated income statement (unaudited) 22
    Condensed consolidated statement of comprehensive income (unaudited) 23
    Condensed consolidated balance sheet (unaudited) 24
    Condensed consolidated statement of changes in equity (unaudited) 25
    Condensed consolidated cash flow statement (unaudited) 28
    Notes to the condensed consolidated half-year financial statements (unaudited) 29
       
    Statement of directors’ responsibilities 52
    Independent review report to Lloyds Bank Plc 53
    Contacts 54


    FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

    This document contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the US Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and section 27A of the US Securities Act of 1933, as amended, with respect to the business, strategy, plans and/or results of Lloyds Bank plc together with its subsidiaries (the Lloyds Bank Group) and its current goals and expectations. Statements that are not historical or current facts, including statements about the Lloyds Bank Group’s or its directors’ and/or management’s beliefs and expectations, are forward-looking statements. Words such as, without limitation, ‘believes’, ‘achieves’, ‘anticipates’, ‘estimates’, ‘expects’, ‘targets’, ‘should’, ‘intends’, ‘aims’, ‘projects’, ‘plans’, ‘potential’, ‘will’, ‘would’, ‘could’, ‘considered’, ‘likely’, ‘may’, ‘seek’, ‘estimate’, ‘probability’, ‘goal’, ‘objective’, ‘deliver’, ‘endeavour’, ‘prospects’, ‘optimistic’ and similar expressions or variations on these expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements concern or may affect future matters, including but not limited to: projections or expectations of the Lloyds Bank Group’s future financial position, including profit attributable to shareholders, provisions, economic profit, dividends, capital structure, portfolios, net interest margin, capital ratios, liquidity, risk-weighted assets (RWAs), expenditures or any other financial items or ratios; litigation, regulatory and governmental investigations; the Lloyds Bank Group’s future financial performance; the level and extent of future impairments and write-downs; the Lloyds Bank Group’s ESG targets and/or commitments; statements of plans, objectives or goals of the Lloyds Bank Group or its management and other statements that are not historical fact and statements of assumptions underlying such statements. By their nature, forward-looking statements involve risk and uncertainty because they relate to events and depend upon circumstances that will or may occur in the future. Factors that could cause actual business, strategy, targets, plans and/or results (including but not limited to the payment of dividends) to differ materially from forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to: general economic and business conditions in the UK and internationally (including in relation to tariffs); imposed and threatened tariffs and changes to global trade policies; acts of hostility or terrorism and responses to those acts, or other such events; geopolitical unpredictability; the war between Russia and Ukraine; the escalation of conflicts in the Middle East; the tensions between China and Taiwan; political instability including as a result of any UK general election; market related risks, trends and developments; changes in client and consumer behaviour and demand; exposure to counterparty risk; the ability to access sufficient sources of capital, liquidity and funding when required; changes to the Lloyds Bank Group’s or Lloyds Banking Group plc’s credit ratings; fluctuations in interest rates, inflation, exchange rates, stock markets and currencies; volatility in credit markets; volatility in the price of the Lloyds Bank Group’s securities; natural pandemic and other disasters; risks concerning borrower and counterparty credit quality; risks affecting defined benefit pension schemes; changes in laws, regulations, practices and accounting standards or taxation; changes to regulatory capital or liquidity requirements and similar contingencies; the policies and actions of governmental or regulatory authorities or courts together with any resulting impact on the future structure of the Lloyds Bank Group; risks associated with the Lloyds Bank Group’s compliance with a wide range of laws and regulations; assessment related to resolution planning requirements; risks related to regulatory actions which may be taken in the event of a bank or Lloyds Bank Group or Lloyds Banking Group failure; exposure to legal, regulatory or competition proceedings, investigations or complaints; failure to comply with anti-money laundering, counter terrorist financing, anti-bribery and sanctions regulations; failure to prevent or detect any illegal or improper activities; operational risks including risks as a result of the failure of third party suppliers; conduct risk; technological changes and risks to the security of IT and operational infrastructure, systems, data and information resulting from increased threat of cyber and other attacks; technological failure; inadequate or failed internal or external processes or systems; risks relating to ESG matters, such as climate change (and achieving climate change ambitions) and decarbonisation, including the Lloyds Bank Group’s or the Lloyds Banking Group’s ability along with the government and other stakeholders to measure, manage and mitigate the impacts of climate change effectively, and human rights issues; the impact of competitive conditions; failure to attract, retain and develop high calibre talent; the ability to achieve strategic objectives; the ability to derive cost savings and other benefits including, but without limitation, as a result of any acquisitions, disposals and other strategic transactions; inability to capture accurately the expected value from acquisitions; and assumptions and estimates that form the basis of the Lloyds Bank Group’s financial statements. A number of these influences and factors are beyond the Lloyds Bank Group’s control. Please refer to the latest Annual Report on Form 20-F filed by Lloyds Bank plc with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC), which is available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov, for a discussion of certain factors and risks. Lloyds Bank plc may also make or disclose written and/or oral forward-looking statements in other written materials and in oral statements made by the directors, officers or employees of Lloyds Bank plc to third parties, including financial analysts. Except as required by any applicable law or regulation, the forward-looking statements contained in this document are made as of today’s date, and the Lloyds Bank Group expressly disclaims any obligation or undertaking to release publicly any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statements contained in this document whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. The information, statements and opinions contained in this document do not constitute a public offer under any applicable law or an offer to sell any securities or financial instruments or any advice or recommendation with respect to such securities or financial instruments.


    CONTACTS

    For further information please contact:


    INVESTORS AND ANALYSTS

    Douglas Radcliffe

    Group Investor Relations Director

    020 7356 1571

    douglas.radcliffe@lloydsbanking.com

    Rohith Chandra-Rajan

    Director of Investor Relations

    07353 885 690

    rohith.chandra-rajan@lloydsbanking.com

    Nora Thoden

    Director of Investor Relations – ESG

    020 7356 2334

    nora.thoden@lloydsbanking.com

    Tom Grantham

    Investor Relations Senior Manager

    07851 440 091

    thomas.grantham@lloydsbanking.com

    Sarah Robson

    Investor Relations Senior Manager

    07494 513 983

    sarah.robson2@lloydsbanking.com


    CORPORATE AFFAIRS

    Matt Smith

    Head of Media Relations

    07788 352 487

    matt.smith@lloydsbanking.com

    Emma Fairhurst

    Media Relations Senior Manager

    07814 395 855

    emma.fairhurst@lloydsbanking.com

    Copies of this News Release may be obtained from:
    Investor Relations, Lloyds Banking Group plc, 33 Old Broad Street, London, EC2N 1HZ
    The statement can also be found on the Group’s website – www.lloydsbankinggroup.com

    Registered office: Lloyds Bank plc, 25 Gresham Street, London, EC2V 7HN
    Registered in England No. 2065

    Click on, or paste the following link into your web browser, to view the associated PDF document.

    http://www.rns-pdf.londonstockexchange.com/rns/4360S_1-2025-7-24.pdf

    This information is provided by RNS, the news service of the London Stock Exchange. RNS is approved by the Financial Conduct Authority to act as a Primary Information Provider in the United Kingdom. Terms and conditions relating to the use and distribution of this information may apply. For further information, please contact rns@lseg.com or visit www.rns.com.

    The MIL Network –

  • MIL-OSI: Mark Cuban Foundation and Who We Play For Bring Free AI Bootcamp to Melbourne Teens

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    MELBOURNE, Fla., July 24, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — High school students in Melbourne have the chance to get hands-on experience with artificial intelligence through a free AI Bootcamp launched by the Mark Cuban Foundation, in partnership with Who We Play For and Groundswell Startups. Applications close September 30.

    This event brings the only artificial intelligence (AI) camp of its kind, free of charge, to the Space Coast. With a custom and highly-relevant curriculum focused on teaching students about the latest developments in the world of AI and Generative AI, the camp will provide the tools to make these technologies work for them and promises to educate, inspire and fuel the next generation of AI professionals.

    The program aims to provide students with a foundational understanding of artificial intelligence and its applications to future careers. Students can select from six tracks: healthcare, arts and entertainment, business and entrepreneurship, computer science, sports science, or education and career readiness. Driven by the belief that fostering interest in AI at a young age is crucial for preparing the next generation for their future, the AI Bootcamps are introductory and accessible to students in 9-12 grade with an interest in technology. Students do not need any familiarity with computer science or programming to attend.

    This free AI Bootcamp is hosted for underserved high school students with a transparent focus on recruiting girls, students of color, first generation college students, and those from low to moderate income households. The AI Bootcamp Program provides students with lunch and a snack, transportation assistance, and technology equipment during bootcamp.

    “As AI continues to become an undeniable force in all of our lives, it’s crucial that we open the door to this knowledge, especially to young people who want to explore it,” said Mark Cuban, founder. “While technology expands and becomes more advanced, it becomes more critical that we ensure our students are prepared when they apply for schools or jobs in the future. Thanks to our work with Who We Play For and Groundswell Startups, the bootcamp will offer an avenue to explore this fascinating field of technology to any student, no matter their means.”

    This year’s bootcamp, taking place in Melbourne on November 1st, 8th, and 15th is hosted and staffed by Groundswell Startups and Who We Play For, two organizations dedicated to fostering innovation, growth, and opportunity on the Space Coast.

    Who We Play For, a nonprofit organization committed to preventing sudden cardiac death in young people by providing affordable and accessible heart screenings. Founded in memory of Rafe Maccarone, a local student-athlete who lost his life to sudden cardiac arrest in 2007, the organization works tirelessly to ensure that no family, team, or community has to experience a similar loss. Through partnerships with schools, sports clubs, and community organizations, Who We Play For brings non-invasive heart screenings to youth across the country while raising awareness about the importance of early detection and advocating for increased access to life-saving resources.

    Groundswell Startups, founded in 2016, is a non-profit incubator and coworking space bringing concepts to life and accelerating scalability for businesses ranging from tech to manufacturing in Florida’s Space Coast and around the Southeast region.

    “This partnership reflects what Groundswell was built to do,” said Groundswell Co-Founder Bud Deffebach. “Events like these empower the next generation of tech innovators to understand and utilize AI. We are proud to join with the Mark Cuban Foundation in providing this experience to local students.”

    This partnership is one of more than 25 selected to host camps across the U.S. and the only event hosted in Florida.

    “We are thrilled to partner with the Mark Cuban Foundation and Groundswell Startups to share insights on artificial intelligence and the importance of early exposure to emerging technologies. This partnership is a great opportunity to showcase how AI is driving meaningful impact in our work here at Who We Play For, and we are proud to bring the AI Bootcamp to our hometown,” said Who We Play For Technical Director, Klynton Holmes.

    There are just 9 weeks left until the September 30 deadline. Do not miss your chance—submit your application now, as spaces are limited.

    Apply for the bootcamp at: markcubanai.org.

    Watch Mark Cuban’s message about Mark Cuban Foundation’s AI bootcamps and access the full media kit here.

    To learn more, visit markcubanai.org.

    This bootcamp is facilitated with support from Mark Cuban Foundation AI Bootcamp Program’s media partner, Notified, a globally trusted technology partner for investor relations, public relations and marketing professionals.

    About Mark Cuban Foundation’s AI Bootcamp Initiative
    The Mark Cuban Foundation is a 501(c)(3) private non-profit led by entrepreneur and investor Mark Cuban. The AI Bootcamps Program at MCF seeks to inspire young people with emerging technology so that they can create more equitable futures for themselves and their communities. Over 3 consecutive Saturdays underserved 9th – 12th grade students learn what AI is and isn’t, where they already interact with AI in their own lives, the ethical implications of AI systems, and much more. Learn more about the no-cost AI Bootcamp program at markcubanai.org.

    About Who We Play For

    WWPF represents every young person who lost their life to sudden cardiac arrest (SCA). Our fight is to ensure that other families, teams, and communities will never know that pain.

    On our mission to eliminate preventable sudden cardiac death in the young through affordable heart screenings, WWPF has screened over 450,000 youth across more than 500 communities throughout the United States. As a result of WWPF’s screening program, more than 450 youth with life threatening heart conditions have received immediate, life-saving medical intervention and thousands more are now aware of cardiac abnormalities that may increase their risk for SCA later in life.

    Alongside the world’s leaders in pediatric cardiology, our vision is to elevate the standard of care for ALL youth, no matter their level of athletics, socio-economic status or geographical location.

    About Groundswell Startups

    Groundswell, a nonprofit high-tech incubator in Florida’s Space Coast, serves as a hub that unites founders, mentors, investors, and trusted support services. Our mission is simple yet powerful: to envelop entrepreneurs in a supportive ecosystem abundant with resources. We pave the way for company building, industry disruption, and scalable growth. At Groundswell, we believe in empowering startups with the essential network and resources to thrive in the heart of the Space Coast’s innovation landscape. Learn more or find support for your startup idea at www.swellstartups.com.

    The MIL Network –

  • MIL-OSI: Unimot plans to enter the defence sector – a joint project with PZL Sędziszów and a Ukrainian partner in the field of drones

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    WARSAW, Poland, July 24, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — PZL Defence was established on 21 July 2025 and is currently undergoing registration. On 24 July 2025, Unimot signed a letter of intent with PZL Sędziszów and PZL Defence, declaring its intention to develop strategic cooperation and build the new company’s expertise in the field of advanced defence technologies. At the same time, an agreement was concluded under which Unimot, following the registration of PZL Defence in the National Court Register, will acquire 40% of the shares in the new company for the amount of PLN 400,000. The initial shareholding structure also provides for a target share of 10% for PZL Sędziszów and 50% for the Ukrainian partner. After completion of the investment process and obtaining the necessary administrative approvals, PZL Defence plans to launch the production of civilian drones and then, after obtaining a licence, expand its activities to include military drones and anti-drone systems for the protection of critical infrastructure.

    “We see the growing importance of unmanned technologies for regional security. That is why we plan to engage in a project that combines Polish engineering resources with the unique know-how of our Ukrainian partners, proven not on a training ground but in real combat conditions,” says Adam Sikorski, President of the Management Board of Unimot.

    PZL Sędziszów (the name comes from the abbreviation: Polskie Zakłady Lotnicze, meaning Polish Aviation Works), as a licensed manufacturer for the defence sector, will contribute advanced expertise in precision engineering to the project and provide access to a new production hall adapted to the requirements of the defence industry and extensive laboratory and technological facilities. PZL Sędziszów is a plant with over 85 years of history and, based on its current military production licences, currently manufactures filters for military vehicles (Rosomak) and military helicopters from the Leonardo group.

    The team of the new company, PZL Defence, is being built with the participation of experts from Poland and Ukraine, including specialists with military and industrial experience. Ultimately, the company will establish a research and development (R&D) centre focused on the design of reconnaissance and interception drones, loitering munitions and systems for neutralising threats from unmanned aerial vehicles.

    “The PZL Defence project is a carefully considered response to the profound transformation taking place on the modern battlefield. Since 2022, Russia has deployed over 28,000 Shahed drones against Ukraine, and according to Ukrainian intelligence, this number could soon rise to over 500 drones every night. This clearly shows that anti-drone systems are becoming an integral part of modern defence, both offensive and defensive. Together with our partners, we want to develop technologies that provide a real response to these challenges,” emphasises Adam Sikorski.

    The planned activities are in line with the long-term trend of increasing defence spending, both in Poland and across Europe. In 2025, Poland’s defence budget will reach a record PLN 186.6 billion, which is 4.7% of the planned GDP. In the following years, spending is expected to grow – according to estimates, in 2025–2035 it may reach a total of PLN 1.9 trillion. The PZL Defence project is also in line with EU priorities such as the Readiness 2030 programme and the SAFE mechanism, which aim to allocate up to EUR 800 billion to investments in the European defence industry, with access to financial resources, EIB instruments and a flexible budgetary framework.

    CONTACT:
    Agnieszka Pawelska
    rzecznik prasowy
    tel. + 48 695 102 997
    e-mail: pr@unimot.pl
    https://www.unimot.pl/

    Source: UNIMOT S.A.

    A photo accompanying this announcement is available at https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/1fc0953e-992e-47b1-80cb-cf9d1278580c

    The MIL Network –

  • MIL-OSI: ETHRANSACTION Launches 2025 Guide for Newbies to Yield BTC and DogeCoin

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    New York City, NY, July 24, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — With the evolving financial landscape, more people are adding cryptocurrencies to their portfolios. The current momentum in the crypto market has drawn in new participants eager to earn returns. However, due to a lack of experience, some newcomers face losses from uninformed decisions. That’s why smart investors are now turning to platforms like ETHRANSACTION, which offer stable returns and a smooth entry into the crypto space.

    Through ETHRANSACTION’s remote digital asset earning service, users gain more reliable income streams and can quickly understand the crypto landscape, benefiting from the potential growth of Bitcoin and Dogecoin. In this article, we explore how ETHRANSACTION works, how it simplifies digital earnings, and how it can help users reach daily profits of $19,494 or more.

    ETHRANSACTION’s Remote Platform:

    Generating income from digital currencies no longer requires expensive hardware, technical knowledge, or constant monitoring. ETHRANSACTION simplifies the process, allowing anyone to take part, regardless of experience. Instead of investing in physical infrastructure or complex systems, users lease algorithmic resources remotely and earn a percentage of the returns.

    Why Choose ETHRANSACTION?

    ETHRANSACTION is ideal for beginners due to its ultra-simple, user-friendly interface. Even crypto novices can start immediately. For users, efficiency is rewarded, hands-off participation becomes the key to success.

    As a global leader in digital asset solutions, ETHRANSACTION operates over 100 facilities worldwide powered entirely by renewable energy. With over 8.1 million users, the platform has built a reputation for delivering consistent returns and prioritizing user safety.

    ETHRANSACTION is recognized for its exceptional daily passive income, offering opportunities to earn thousands of dollars per day. Imagine earning a strong income without active management, this is what ETHRANSACTION delivers.

    Trust and security are fundamental in crypto-based earnings, and ETHRANSACTION understands this well. The platform upholds full transparency and compliance, ensuring that your capital remains protected while your profits grow. Its operations use clean energy, contributing to carbon neutrality and sustainable investment practices, offering not only high returns but also environmental responsibility.

    Key Advantages of ETHRANSACTION:

    • Instant $19 bonus upon registration.
    • High earning potential with automated daily payouts.
    • No hidden service or maintenance fees.
    • Supports 7+ cryptocurrencies including DOGE, BTC, LTC, ETH, USDC, USDT, and BCH.
    • Affiliate program with up to 6% commission for each referral.
    • Enterprise-grade security: McAfee® and Cloudflare® protections, 100% uptime guarantee, and 24/7 live support.

    How to Join ETHRANSACTION:

    Step 1: Create an Account
    Register quickly with just your email address. Once registered, users can begin earning returns from Bitcoin and other digital assets instantly.

    Step 2: Select a Plan
    ETHRANSACTION offers various earning packages tailored to different investment levels. Here are a few popular options:

    • Avalon Plan
      Amount: $100 → Total Return: $100 + $18
    • DG Home1 Plan
      Amount: $600 → Total Return: $600 + $52.5
    • L7 Plan
      Amount: $1,300 → Total Return: $1,300 + $236.6
    • T21 Plan
      Amount: $3,700 → Total Return: $3,700 + $1,021.2
    • D1 Plan
      Amount: $6,300 → Total Return: $6,300 + $2,441.25

    Earnings begin within 24 hours of plan activation. Once your balance reaches $100, you may withdraw to your digital wallet or reinvest in another plan of your choice.

    Affiliate Program:

    ETHRANSACTION’s referral program allows you to earn even without investing. Simply invite others to join. When your referrals participate, you earn up to 6% commission—unlimited referrals mean unlimited earning potential.

    Summary

    If you’re looking for a hands-off way to grow your crypto assets, ETHRANSACTION offers an effective solution. These types of automated opportunities are ideal for investors who prefer “autopilot” over active trading.

    Passive income remains a top goal for modern investors, and ETHRANSACTION makes it easier than ever to achieve. Whether you’re just starting or scaling up, the platform is designed for reliable, secure, and eco-conscious crypto earnings.

    To learn more, visit the official ETHRANSACTION website:
    https://ethransaction.vip
    Email: info@ethransaction.vip

    Attachment

    The MIL Network –

  • MIL-OSI: Gevo to Report Second Quarter 2025 Financial Results on August 11, 2025

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    ENGLEWOOD, Colo., July 24, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Gevo, Inc. (NASDAQ: GEVO) announced today that it will host a conference call on August 11, 2025, at 4:30 p.m. ET (2:30 p.m. MT) to report its financial results for the second quarter that ended June 30, 2025.

    To participate in the live call, please register through the following event weblink: https://register-conf.media-server.com/register/BI837becc646fa4780899cbd8ed1b21b9a

    After registering, participants will be provided with a dial-in number and pin.

    To listen to the conference call (audio only), please register through the following event weblink: https://edge.media-server.com/mmc/p/u9fuak7q

    A webcast replay will be available two hours after the conference call ends on August 11, 2025. The archived webcast will be available in the Investor Relations section of Gevo’s website at www.gevo.com.

    About Gevo
    Gevo is a next-generation diversified energy company committed to fueling America’s future with cost-effective, drop-in fuels that contribute to energy security, abate carbon, and strengthen rural communities to drive economic growth. Gevo’s innovative technology can be used to make a variety of renewable products, including SAF, motor fuels, chemicals, and other materials that provide U.S.-made solutions. By investing in the backbone of rural America, Gevo’s business model includes developing, financing, and operating production facilities that create jobs and revitalize communities. Gevo owns and operates one of the largest dairy-based renewable natural gas (“RNG”) facilities in the United States, turning by-products into clean, reliable energy. We also operate an ethanol plant with an adjacent carbon capture and sequestration (“CCS”) facility, further solidifying America’s leadership in energy innovation. Additionally, Gevo owns the world’s first production facility for specialty alcohol-to-jet (“ATJ”) fuels and chemicals. Gevo’s market-driven “pay for performance” approach regarding carbon and other sustainability attributes helps ensure value is delivered to our local economy. Through its Verity subsidiary, Gevo provides transparency, accountability, and efficiency in tracking, measuring and verifying various attributes throughout the supply chain. By strengthening rural economies, Gevo is working to secure a self-sufficient future and to make sure value is brought to the market.

    For more information, see www.gevo.com.

    PUBLIC AFFAIRS CONTACT
    Heather Manuel
    VP of Stakeholder Engagement & Partnerships
    PR@gevo.com

    INVESTOR CONTACT
    Eric Frey, PhD
    VP of Corporate Development
    IR@gevo.com

    The MIL Network –

  • MIL-Evening Report: Business coalition calls for 25% cut in the cost of red tape by 2030

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra

    Business, universities, and investors have jointly urged the federal government to commit to cutting the cost of red tape by 25% by 2030, in a submission for next month’s Economic Reform Roundtable.

    The push to reduce regulation is in line with action by the EU and the United Kingdom’s Labour government, the submission says.

    “Cutting red tape means faster home builds, quicker loan approvals, and lower prices at the checkout,” it says.

    “For Australians, it’s the difference between waiting months or days for a service, and it ensures growth isn’t choked by unnecessary or outdated processes that haven’t kept up with the modern world.”

    The need to push against red tape is highlighted in the recently-published book Abundance by Derek Thompson and Ezra Klein. The book has impressed Treasurer Jim Chalmers, who has urged his colleagues to read it.

    The coalition of 27 groups includes small, medium and large businesses, universities and the investment community. The united approach is an attempt by business to avoid being divided and trapped at the roundtable, as business felt it was at the 2022 Jobs and Skills summit.

    On taxation, the submission proposes a three-month review, supported by Treasury, the Productivity Commission, business representatives and other stakeholders to “kick start” comprehensive tax reform.

    The exercise would be underpinned by principles that encouraged investment and economic growth.

    Business has become concerned the roundtable could be a way of seeking support for tax increases rather than comprehensive tax reform.

    The submission says tax reform and the trade offs involved, should not be pursued separately from measures to promote efficiency and spending restraint to “ensure government lives within its means”.

    Tax reform should support the dynamism and productivity of Australian individuals and businesses”, the submission says.

    Revenue should be raised with the least possible cost to society, and there should be minimum distortions to work, savings and investment.

    Among other proposals, the coalition urges a boost to investment and innovation by reforming the handling of R&D.

    It says there should be a national strategy to boost Australia’s investment competitiveness.

    The submission backs reforming the framework for environmental and planning approvals. It says there should be a “single, predictable, and transparent approval pathway that provides timely and certain decisions.”

    “Our economic rule book is out of date. If we don’t fix it, not only will Australians struggle to get ahead in life, but future generations are at risk of missing out on the quality of life we enjoy today,” the joint group of industry associations says.

    Michelle Grattan does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    – ref. Business coalition calls for 25% cut in the cost of red tape by 2030 – https://theconversation.com/business-coalition-calls-for-25-cut-in-the-cost-of-red-tape-by-2030-259688

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

  • MIL-OSI: Nasdaq Reports Second Quarter 2025 Results; Double-Digit Net Revenue Growth Reflects Strong Momentum Across All Divisions

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    NEW YORK, July 24, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Nasdaq, Inc. (Nasdaq: NDAQ) today reported financial results for the second quarter of 2025.

    • Second quarter 2025 net revenue1 was $1.3 billion, an increase of 13% over the second quarter of 2024, or up 12% on an organic2 basis. This included Solutions3 revenue growing 10%.
    • Annualized Recurring Revenue (ARR)4 of $2.9 billion increased 10% over the second quarter of 2024, or up 9% on an organic basis. Annualized SaaS revenue increased 13%, or 12% on an organic basis, and represented 37% of ARR.
    • Financial Technology revenue of $464 million increased 10% over the second quarter of 2024.
    • Index revenue of $196 million grew 17%, with $88 billion of net inflows over the trailing twelve months and $20 billion in the second quarter of 2025.
    • GAAP diluted earnings per share grew over 100% in the second quarter of 2025. Non-GAAP5 diluted earnings per share grew 24% in the second quarter of 2025.
    • In the second quarter of 2025, the company returned $155 million to shareholders through dividends and $100 million through repurchases of common stock. The company also repaid $400 million of senior unsecured notes in the quarter.

    Second Quarter 2025 Highlights

    (US$ millions, except per share) 2Q25 YoY change % Adjusted2YoY
    change %    		 Organic YoY
    change %
    Solutions revenue $991 10% 10% 10%
    Market Services net revenue $306 22% 21% 21%
    Net revenue $1,306 13% 12% 12%
    GAAP operating income $568 34%    
    Non-GAAP operating income $721 16% 16% 16%
    ARR $2,931 10% 9% 9%
    GAAP diluted EPS $0.78 103%    
    Non-GAAP diluted EPS $0.85 24%   24%

    Note: Adjusted and organic change for 2Q25 as compared to 2Q24 are equivalent as they include the same period over period adjustments. Refer to the footnotes to this press release for more information.

    Adena Friedman, Chair and CEO said, “Nasdaq delivered an excellent second quarter performance amid a dynamic market environment. Our ability to deliver broad-based growth through cycles is testament to our role as a partner to our clients, helping them capture strategic opportunities, manage risk, and solidify their operational resilience.

    Looking ahead, we remain well-positioned to enhance value for our clients and shareholders by driving innovation and deepening our client relationships through our One Nasdaq approach.”

    Sarah Youngwood, Executive Vice President and CFO said, “Nasdaq’s financial results highlight the resilience of our business model and its ability to achieve exceptional revenue and earnings growth with strong free cash flow generation.

    We are executing well on our capital allocation priorities, including repaying debt, and have surpassed our gross leverage milestone 16 months ahead of plan. We will optimize for long-term investor returns as we make organic growth investments and balance further deleveraging with opportunistic share repurchases.”

    FINANCIAL REVIEW

    • Second quarter 2025 net revenue was $1,306 million, reflecting 13% growth versus the prior year period. Organic net revenue growth was 12%.
    • Solutions revenue was $991 million in the second quarter of 2025, up 10% versus the prior year period, reflecting strong growth from Index and Financial Technology.
    • ARR grew 10% year-over-year, or 9% on an organic basis, in the second quarter of 2025, with 12% ARR growth for Financial Technology, or 11% on an organic basis, and 7% ARR growth for Capital Access Platforms, or 6% on an organic basis.
    • Market Services net revenue was $306 million in the second quarter of 2025, up 22% versus the prior year period, or 21% on an organic basis.
    • Second quarter 2025 GAAP operating expenses were $738 million, in line with the prior year period. The quarter reflected lower restructuring costs, offset by higher compensation and benefits costs, merger and strategic initiative costs, and increased investments in technology and people to drive innovation and long-term growth.
    • Second quarter 2025 non-GAAP operating expenses were $585 million, reflecting 9% growth versus the prior year period, or 8% growth on an organic basis. The organic increase for the quarter reflected growth driven by increased investments in technology and people to drive innovation and long-term growth, partially offset by the benefit of synergies.
    • Cash flow from operations was $746 million for the second quarter, enabling the company to make continued progress on its deleveraging plan. In the second quarter of 2025, the company returned $155 million to shareholders through dividends and $100 million through repurchases of common stock. As of June 30, 2025, there was $1.5 billion remaining under the board authorized share repurchase program. The company also repaid $400 million of senior unsecured notes in the second quarter of 2025.

    2025 EXPENSE AND TAX GUIDANCE UPDATE6

    • The company is updating its 2025 non-GAAP operating expense guidance to a range of $2,295 million to $2,335 million. The driver of the update is the impact of foreign exchange rates, which is offset in net revenue. The company is maintaining its 2025 non-GAAP tax rate guidance in the range of 22.5% to 24.5%.

    STRATEGIC AND BUSINESS UPDATES

    • Financial Technology achieved solid revenue growth across each subdivision in a dynamic macro environment. Robust client demand drove double-digit revenue and ARR growth. FinTech delivered 57 new clients, 130 upsells, and a record 7 cross-sells. Second quarter highlights included:
      • Financial Crime Management Technology is executing on its key growth initiatives. Second quarter results included three new enterprise client signings, including a cross-sell client and 2 upsells, reflecting continued progress on its enterprise client land and expand strategy. Nasdaq Verafin added 46 new small-and-medium bank clients in the second quarter. The business also signed its first proof of concept project with a European Tier 1 bank as part of its international expansion strategy.
      • Regulatory Technology’s success with new client wins and upsells driving growth. AxiomSL signed a new client and a cross-sell. The business accelerated its momentum with existing clients in the second quarter with 34 upsells, including the renewal of a large bank. Surveillance signed 6 new clients in the quarter, including 2 market operators and a European regulator, as well as 3 cross-sells. The business closed 33 upsells in the quarter, including a strategic upsell to a large European bank.
      • Solid momentum in Capital Markets Technology. Second quarter client demand was robust, supported by the ongoing market modernization mega trend. Calypso signed 2 new clients, 37 upsells, and a cross-sell. Market Technology secured 2 new clients, 24 upsells, and a cross-sell. In the second quarter, the business signed 3 clients to its fourth-generation marketplace technology platform, Nasdaq Eqlipse, including 2 fully managed services mandates where Nasdaq hosts and manages the clients’ entire trading environment and one AWS-hosted SaaS deployment.
    • Index ETP assets under management reached record levels and surpassed $700 billion at quarter-end. In the second quarter, Index had $20 billion in net inflows. ETP AUM was $745 billion at quarter-end, an all-time high. Nasdaq launched 33 new Index products in the second quarter, including 21 international products, 12 products in partnership with new Index clients, and 7 in the institutional insurance annuity space. Nasdaq and CME Group signed an extension through 2039 of CME Group’s exclusive license contract to offer futures and options on futures based on the Nasdaq-100 and other Nasdaq indexes, reflecting the companies’ shared commitment to delivering value through trusted benchmark products.
    • Nasdaq extended its listing leadership to 46 consecutive quarters. Nasdaq had the highest number of first half listings since 2021. New listings in the first half included 83 operating companies that raised more than $8 billion in total proceeds, contributing to a 81% win rate for eligible operating company listings. In the second quarter, the company welcomed 38 U.S. operating company IPOs that raised more than $3.5 billion in proceeds with a 79% win rate. Nasdaq maintained momentum in its switch program, attracting nearly $50 billion in market value in the second quarter and over $270 billion year-to-date, including Shopify, Thomson Reuters, and Kimberly Clark.
    • Market Services delivered record net revenue with record cash equities and derivatives revenue in the U.S. Nasdaq’s exchanges achieved record U.S. cash equities volumes in a quarter in which the industry achieved record volumes. During the Russell reconstitution, Nasdaq’s Closing Cross successfully executed 2.5 billion shares in 0.871 seconds across Nasdaq-listed securities that represented a record $102.5 billion dollars in notional value. Extending the first quarter’s trend, Nasdaq’s North American markets continued to experience exceptional message traffic in the second quarter, reaching a new record of more than 560 billion messages7 in a day. Nasdaq’s European equities business achieved sequential market share improvement in an elevated volume environment.
    • Nasdaq continues to execute on its 2025 strategic priorities — Integrate, Innovate, Accelerate — positioning the company to capitalize on opportunities for sustainable, scalable, and resilient growth.
      • Integrate – Nasdaq is on track to action its $140 million expanded net expense efficiency program by year-end, with approximately $130 million actioned as of the end of the second quarter. In the second quarter, Nasdaq surpassed the 3.3x gross leverage milestone that was set following the Adenza acquisition, achieving this milestone 16 months ahead of plan.
      • Innovate – Nasdaq continues to focus on innovating across the business. In July, Nasdaq Verafin announced the launch of its Agentic AI workforce. This suite of digital workers, now in beta testing, has the potential to address the most resource intensive anti-money laundering workflows. For example, when onboarded into a bank’s alert triage workflow, the Digital Sanctions Analyst automates the screening, documentation and acknowledgement processes, reducing alert review workload requiring human intervention by more than 80%. Beyond AI, Calypso announced a proof of concept that expands its industry-leading collateral management capabilities with digital assets. The use case demonstrates Nasdaq’s ability to integrate on-chain capabilities and help financial institutions manage collateral across asset classes in a more dynamic and efficient manner. Nasdaq became the exclusive distributor of Nasdaq Private Market’s Tape D(R) API in the second quarter to deliver real-time private market data and valuation insights to investors.
      • Accelerate – Nasdaq continued to deliver on its One Nasdaq strategy driving 7 cross-sell wins across Financial Technology in the quarter for a total of 26 cross-sells since the Adenza acquisition. Nasdaq remains on track to surpass $100 million in run-rate revenue from cross-sells by the end of 2027. At the end of the second quarter, cross-sells continued to account for over 15% of Financial Technology’s sales pipeline.

    ____________
    1 Represents revenue less transaction-based expenses.
    2 Adjusted and organic change for 2Q25 as compared to 2Q24 are equivalent as they include the same period over period adjustments. These changes are calculated by (i) removing the impact of period over period changes in foreign currency exchange rates (ii) adjusting for the impact of a divestiture and (iii) adjusting for the impact of AxiomSL on-premises contracts for ratable recognition for 2Q24, which was immaterial during that period. As it relates to ARR, organic changes only exclude the impacts of period over period changes in foreign currency exchange rates and a divestiture as the AxiomSL ratable recognition adjustment had no impact on ARR. Adjusted operating results also exclude the impact of the previously announced one-time revenue benefit in our Index business in 1Q24 ($16 million), which did not have an impact on our 2Q25 period over period change but does have an impact on year to date period over period results.
    3 Constitutes revenue from our Capital Access Platforms and Financial Technology segments.
    4 Annualized Recurring Revenue (ARR) for a given period is the current annualized value derived from subscription contracts with a defined contract value. This excludes contracts that are not recurring, are one-time in nature or where the contract value fluctuates based on defined metrics. ARR is currently one of our key performance metrics to assess the health and trajectory of our recurring business. ARR does not have any standardized definition and is therefore unlikely to be comparable to similarly titled measures presented by other companies. ARR should be viewed independently of revenue and deferred revenue and is not intended to be combined with or to replace either of those items. For AxiomSL and Calypso recurring revenue contracts, the amount included in ARR is consistent with the amount that we invoice the customer during the current period. Additionally, for AxiomSL and Calypso recurring revenue contracts that include annual values that increase over time, we include in ARR only the annualized value of components of the contract that are considered active as of the date of the ARR calculation. We do not include the future committed increases in the contract value as of the date of the ARR calculation. ARR is not a forecast and the active contracts at the end of a reporting period used in calculating ARR may or may not be extended or renewed by our customers.
    5 Refer to our reconciliations of U.S. GAAP to non-GAAP net income attributable to Nasdaq, diluted earnings per share, operating income, operating expenses and organic impacts included in the attached schedules.
    6 U.S. GAAP operating expense and tax rate guidance are not provided due to the inherent difficulty in quantifying certain amounts due to a variety of factors including the unpredictability in the movement in foreign currency rates, as well as future charges or reversals outside of the normal course of business.
    7 Message count represents the number of records across Nasdaq’s U.S. options, U.S. and Canadian equities markets, trade reporting facilities, and bond exchange that are recorded into Nasdaq’s data warehouse on a daily basis.

    ABOUT NASDAQ

    Nasdaq (Nasdaq: NDAQ) is a global technology company serving corporate clients, investment managers, banks, brokers, and exchange operators as they navigate and interact with the global capital markets and the broader financial system. We aspire to deliver world-leading platforms that improve the liquidity, transparency, and integrity of the global economy. Our diverse offering of data, analytics, software, exchange capabilities, and client-centric services enables clients to optimize and execute their business vision with confidence. To learn more about the company, technology solutions and career opportunities, visit us on LinkedIn, on X @Nasdaq, or at www.nasdaq.com.

    NON-GAAP INFORMATION

    In addition to disclosing results determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP, Nasdaq also discloses certain non-GAAP results of operations, including, but not limited to, non-GAAP net income attributable to Nasdaq, non-GAAP diluted earnings per share, non-GAAP operating income, and non-GAAP operating expenses, that include certain adjustments or exclude certain charges and gains that are described in the reconciliation tables of U.S. GAAP to non-GAAP information provided at the end of this release. Management uses this non-GAAP information internally, along with U.S. GAAP information, in evaluating our performance and in making financial and operational decisions. We believe our presentation of these measures provides investors with greater transparency and supplemental data relating to our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, we believe the presentation of these measures is useful to investors for period-to-period comparisons of results as the items described below in the reconciliation tables do not reflect ongoing operating performance.

    These measures are not in accordance with, or an alternative to, U.S. GAAP, and may be different from non-GAAP measures used by other companies. In addition, other companies, including companies in our industry, may calculate such measures differently, which reduces their usefulness as a comparative measure. Investors should not rely on any single financial measure when evaluating our business. This information should be considered as supplemental in nature and is not meant as a substitute for our operating results in accordance with U.S. GAAP. We recommend investors review the U.S. GAAP financial measures included in this earnings release. When viewed in conjunction with our U.S. GAAP results and the accompanying reconciliations, we believe these non-GAAP measures provide greater transparency and a more complete understanding of factors affecting our business than U.S. GAAP measures alone.

    We understand that analysts and investors regularly rely on non-GAAP financial measures, such as those noted above, to assess operating performance. We use these measures because they highlight trends more clearly in our business that may not otherwise be apparent when relying solely on U.S. GAAP financial measures, since these measures eliminate from our results specific financial items that have less bearing on our ongoing operating performance.

    Organic revenue and expense growth, organic change and organic impact are non-GAAP measures that reflect adjustments for: (i) the impact of period over period changes in foreign currency exchange rates, and (ii) the revenue, expenses and operating income associated with acquisitions and divestitures for the twelve month period following the date of the acquisition or divestiture and (iii) the impact of AxiomSL on-premises contracts for ratable recognition in comparable periods to align with current period presentation. Reconciliations of these measures are described within the body of this release or in the reconciliation tables at the end of this release.

    Foreign exchange impact: In countries with currencies other than the U.S. dollar, revenue and expenses are translated using monthly average exchange rates. Certain discussions in this release isolate the impact of year-over-year foreign currency fluctuations to better measure the comparability of operating results between periods. Operating results excluding the impact of foreign currency fluctuations are calculated by translating the current period’s results by the prior period’s exchange rates.

    Restructuring programs: In the fourth quarter of 2023, following the closing of the Adenza acquisition, our management approved, committed to and initiated a restructuring program to optimize our efficiencies as a combined organization. We further expanded this program in the fourth quarter of 2024 to accelerate our momentum and further optimize our efficiencies (efficiency program). We have incurred costs principally related to employee-related costs, contract terminations, asset impairments and other related costs and expect to incur additional costs in these areas in an effort to accelerate efficiencies through location strategy and enhanced AI capabilities. Actions taken as part of this program will be complete by the end of 2025, while certain costs may be recognized in the first half of 2026. We expect to achieve benefits primarily in the form of expense synergies. In October 2022, following our September announcement to realign our segments and leadership, we initiated a divisional realignment program with a focus on realizing the full potential of this structure. As of September 30, 2024, we completed our divisional realignment program. Costs related to the Adenza restructuring and the divisional realignment programs are recorded as “restructuring charges” in our condensed consolidated statements of income. We exclude charges associated with these programs for purposes of calculating non-GAAP measures as they are not reflective of ongoing operating performance or comparisons in Nasdaq’s performance between periods.

    CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

    Information set forth in this communication contains forward-looking statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Nasdaq cautions readers that any forward-looking information is not a guarantee of future performance and that actual results could differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking information. Such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to (i) projections relating to our future financial results, total shareholder returns, growth, dividend program, trading volumes, products and services, ability to transition to new business models, taxes and achievement of synergy targets, (ii) statements about the closing or implementation dates and benefits of certain acquisitions, divestitures and other strategic, restructuring, technology, de-leveraging and capital allocation initiatives, (iii) statements about our integrations of our recent acquisitions, (iv) statements relating to any litigation or regulatory or government investigation or action to which we are or could become a party, and (v) other statements that are not historical facts. Forward-looking statements involve a number of risks, uncertainties or other factors beyond Nasdaq’s control. These factors include, but are not limited to, Nasdaq’s ability to implement its strategic initiatives, economic, political and market conditions and fluctuations, geopolitical instability, government and industry regulation, interest rate risk, U.S. and global competition. Further information on these and other factors are detailed in Nasdaq’s filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, including its annual reports on Form 10-K and quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, which are available on Nasdaq’s investor relations website at http://ir.nasdaq.com and the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Nasdaq undertakes no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

    WEBSITE DISCLOSURE

    Nasdaq intends to use its website, https://ir.nasdaq.com/, as a means for disclosing material non-public information and for complying with SEC Regulation FD and other disclosure obligations.

    Media Relations Contact:

    David Lurie
    +1.914.538.0533
    David.Lurie@Nasdaq.com

    Investor Relations Contact:

    Ato Garrett
    +1.212.401.8737
    Ato.Garrett@Nasdaq.com

    -NDAQF-

    Nasdaq, Inc.
    Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income
    (in millions, except per share amounts)
    (unaudited)
               
      Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended
      June 30,   June 30,   June 30,   June 30,
        2025       2024       2025       2024  
                     
    Revenues:              
    Capital Access Platforms $ 527     $ 481     $ 1,042     $ 960  
    Financial Technology   464       420       896       813  
    Market Services   1,090       883       2,224       1,678  
    Other Revenues   9       8       18       18  
      Total revenues   2,090       1,792       4,180       3,469  
    Transaction-based expenses:              
    Transaction rebates   (629 )     (483 )     (1,208 )     (965 )
    Brokerage, clearance and exchange fees   (155 )     (150 )     (429 )     (227 )
    Revenues less transaction-based expenses   1,306       1,159       2,543       2,277  
                   
    Operating Expenses:              
    Compensation and benefits   352       328       681       669  
    Professional and contract services   39       39       75       72  
    Technology and communication infrastructure   79       69       156       135  
    Occupancy   30       27       58       56  
    General, administrative and other   23       30       29       58  
    Marketing and advertising   14       12       28       23  
    Depreciation and amortization   158       153       313       308  
    Regulatory   14       18       29       28  
    Merger and strategic initiatives   20       4       44       13  
    Restructuring charges   9       56       15       82  
      Total operating expenses   738       736       1,428       1,444  
    Operating income   568       423       1,115       833  
    Interest income   12       6       24       12  
    Interest expense   (95 )     (102 )     (192 )     (211 )
    Net gain on divestitures   39       —       39       —  
    Other income   1       12       —       13  
    Net income from unconsolidated investees   23       2       50       6  
    Income before income taxes   548       341       1,036       653  
    Income tax provision   96       119       190       198  
    Net income   452       222       846       455  
    Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests   —       —       1       1  
    Net income attributable to Nasdaq $ 452     $ 222     $ 847     $ 456  
                   
    Per share information:              
    Basic earnings per share $ 0.79     $ 0.39     $ 1.47     $ 0.79  
    Diluted earnings per share $ 0.78     $ 0.38     $ 1.46     $ 0.79  
    Cash dividends declared per common share $ 0.27     $ 0.24     $ 0.51     $ 0.46  
                   
    Weighted-average common shares outstanding              
    for earnings per share:              
    Basic   574.1       576.4       574.6       575.9  
    Diluted   579.0       579.0       579.5       578.9  
                     
    Nasdaq, Inc.
    Revenue Detail
    (in millions)
    (unaudited)
                     
            Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended
            June 30,   June 30,   June 30,   June 30,
              2025       2024       2025       2024  
                         
    CAPITAL ACCESS PLATFORMS              
      Data and Listing Services revenues $ 198     $ 187     $ 391     $ 372  
      Index revenues   196       167       388       336  
      Workflow and Insights revenues   133       127       263       252  
        Total Capital Access Platforms revenues   527       481       1,042       960  
                         
    FINANCIAL TECHNOLOGY              
      Financial Crime Management Technology revenues   81       67       157       131  
      Regulatory Technology revenues   104       95       206       186  
      Capital Markets Technology revenues   279       258       533       496  
        Total Financial Technology revenues   464       420       896       813  
                         
    MARKET SERVICES              
      Market Services revenues   1,090       883       2,224       1,678  
      Transaction-based expenses:              
          Transaction rebates   (629 )     (483 )     (1,208 )     (965 )
          Brokerage, clearance and exchange fees   (155 )     (150 )     (429 )     (227 )
        Total Market Services revenues, net   306       250       587       486  
                         
    OTHER REVENUES   9       8       18       18  
                         
    REVENUES LESS TRANSACTION-BASED EXPENSES $ 1,306     $ 1,159     $ 2,543     $ 2,277  
                         
    Nasdaq, Inc.
    Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
    (in millions)
               
          June 30,   December 31,
            2025       2024  
    Assets   (unaudited)    
    Current assets:        
      Cash and cash equivalents   $ 732     $ 592  
      Restricted cash and cash equivalents     195       31  
      Default funds and margin deposits     5,218       5,664  
      Financial investments     84       184  
      Receivables, net     896       1,022  
      Other current assets     227       293  
    Total current assets     7,352       7,786  
    Property and equipment, net     656       593  
    Goodwill     14,328       13,957  
    Intangible assets, net     6,741       6,905  
    Operating lease assets     441       375  
    Other non-current assets     865       779  
    Total assets   $ 30,383     $ 30,395  
               
    Liabilities        
    Current liabilities:        
      Accounts payable and accrued expenses   $ 246     $ 269  
      Section 31 fees payable to SEC     411       319  
      Accrued personnel costs     280       325  
      Deferred revenue     848       711  
      Other current liabilities     154       215  
      Default funds and margin deposits     5,218       5,664  
      Short-term debt     500       399  
    Total current liabilities     7,657       7,902  
    Long-term debt     8,678       9,081  
    Deferred tax liabilities, net     1,540       1,594  
    Operating lease liabilities     453       388  
    Other non-current liabilities     237       230  
    Total liabilities     18,565       19,195  
             
    Commitments and contingencies        
    Equity        
    Nasdaq stockholders’ equity:        
      Common stock     6       6  
      Additional paid-in capital     5,425       5,530  
      Common stock in treasury, at cost     (706 )     (647 )
      Accumulated other comprehensive loss     (1,869 )     (2,099 )
      Retained earnings     8,955       8,401  
    Total Nasdaq stockholders’ equity     11,811       11,191  
      Noncontrolling interests     7       9  
    Total equity     11,818       11,200  
    Total liabilities and equity   $ 30,383     $ 30,395  
               
    Nasdaq, Inc.  
    Reconciliation of U.S. GAAP to Non-GAAP Net Income Attributable to Nasdaq and Diluted Earnings Per Share  
    (in millions, except per share amounts)  
    (unaudited)  
                         
                     
           Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended  
          June 30,   June 30,   June 30,   June 30,  
            2025       2024       2025       2024    
                         
    U.S. GAAP net income attributable to Nasdaq   $ 452     $ 222     $ 847     $ 456    
    Non-GAAP adjustments:                  
      Amortization expense of acquired intangible assets (1)     122       122       243       244    
      Merger and strategic initiatives expense (2)     20       4       44       13    
      Restructuring charges (3)     9       56       15       82    
      Net gain on divestitures (4)     (39 )     —       (39 )     —    
      Net income from unconsolidated investees (5)     (23 )     (2 )     (50 )     (6 )  
      Gain on extinguishment of debt (6)     —       —       (19 )     —    
      Legal and regulatory matters (7)     1       13       4       16    
      Pension settlement charge (8)     —       —       —       23    
      Other loss (income) (9)     1       (10 )     1       (9 )  
      Total non-GAAP adjustments     91       183       199       363    
      Non-GAAP adjustment to the income tax provision (10)     (24 )     (41 )     (70 )     (88 )  
      Other tax adjustments (11)     (27 )     33       (27 )     33    
      Total non-GAAP adjustments, net of tax     40       175       102       308    
    Non-GAAP net income attributable to Nasdaq   $ 492     $ 397     $ 949     $ 764    
                         
    U.S. GAAP diluted earnings per share   $ 0.78     $ 0.38     $ 1.46     $ 0.79    
      Total adjustments from non-GAAP net income above     0.07       0.31       0.18       0.53    
    Non-GAAP diluted earnings per share   $ 0.85     $ 0.69     $ 1.64     $ 1.32    
                         
    Weighted-average diluted common shares outstanding for earnings per share:     579.0       579.0       579.5       578.9    
                         
                         
    (1) We amortize intangible assets acquired in connection with various acquisitions. Intangible asset amortization expense can vary from period to period due to episodic acquisitions completed, rather than from our ongoing business operations.  
    (2) We have pursued various strategic initiatives and completed acquisitions and divestitures in recent years that have resulted in expenses which would not have otherwise been incurred. These expenses generally include integration costs, as well as legal, due diligence and other third-party transaction costs. The frequency and the amount of such expenses vary significantly based on the size, timing and complexity of the transaction. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2025 and June 30, 2024, these costs included Adenza integration costs and other strategic initiative costs. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2024, these costs were partially offset by the recognition of a termination fee due to Nasdaq in the second quarter of 2024 related to the termination of the then proposed divestiture of our Nordic power futures business. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, these costs included a repayment of this fee due to the closing of the transaction with another buyer, as designated in the settlement agreement.  
    (3) For a description of our restructuring programs, see “Restructuring Programs” in the “Non-GAAP Information” section of this earnings release.  
    (4) For the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, we recorded pre-tax net gains on the sale of our Nordic power futures business and our Nasdaq Risk Modelling for Catastrophes business, which are included in net gain on divestitures in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.  
    (5) We exclude our share of the earnings and losses of our equity method investments. This provides a more meaningful analysis of Nasdaq’s ongoing operating performance or comparisons in Nasdaq’s performance between periods.  
    (6) For the six months ended June 30, 2025, we recorded a gain on the extinguishment of debt. This gain is recorded in general, administrative and other expense in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.  
    (7) For the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, this includes accruals relating to certain legal matters, which are recorded in professional and contract services in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2024, these items primarily included the settlement of a Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority, or SFSA, fine, which is recorded in regulatory expense in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.  
    (8) For the six months ended June 30, 2024, we recorded a pre-tax charge as a result of settling our U.S. pension plan. The plan was terminated and partially settled in 2023, with final settlement occurring during the first quarter of 2024. The loss was recorded in compensation and benefits in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.  
    (9) For the three and six months ended June 30, 2024, other items primarily include net gains from strategic investments entered into through our corporate venture program, which are included in other income in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.  
    (10) The non-GAAP adjustment to the income tax provision primarily includes the tax impact of each non-GAAP adjustment. For the six months ended June 30, 2025, this also includes a release of the prior year’s reserves following a favorable audit settlement.  
    (11) For the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, we recorded a tax benefit related to payments made to certain former Adenza employees. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2024, other tax adjustments also includes a one-time net tax expense of $33 million related to the completion of an intra-group transfer of certain IP assets to our U.S. headquarters.  
                         
    Nasdaq, Inc.  
    Reconciliation of U.S. GAAP to Non-GAAP Operating Income and Operating Margin  
    (in millions)  
    (unaudited)  
                     
           Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended  
          June 30,   June 30,   June 30,   June 30,  
            2025       2024       2025       2024    
                         
    U.S. GAAP operating income   $ 568     $ 423     $ 1,115     $ 833    
    Non-GAAP adjustments:                  
      Amortization expense of acquired intangible assets (1)     122       122       243       244    
      Merger and strategic initiatives expense (2)     20       4       44       13    
      Restructuring charges (3)     9       56       15       82    
      Gain on extinguishment of debt (4)     —       —       (19 )     —    
      Legal and regulatory matters (5)     1       13       4       16    
      Pension settlement charge (6)     —       —       —       23    
      Other loss     1       2       1       2    
      Total non-GAAP adjustments     153       197       288       380    
    Non-GAAP operating income   $ 721     $ 620     $ 1,403     $ 1,213    
                       
    Revenues less transaction-based expenses   $ 1,306     $ 1,159     $ 2,543     $ 2,277    
                         
    U.S. GAAP operating margin (7)     44 %     36 %     44 %     37 %  
                         
    Non-GAAP operating margin (8)     55 %     53 %     55 %     53 %  
                         
    Note: The current period percentages are calculated based on exact dollars, and therefore may not recalculate exactly using rounded numbers as presented in US$ millions.  
    (1) We amortize intangible assets acquired in connection with various acquisitions. Intangible asset amortization expense can vary from period to period due to episodic acquisitions completed, rather than from our ongoing business operations.  
    (2) We have pursued various strategic initiatives and completed acquisitions and divestitures in recent years that have resulted in expenses which would not have otherwise been incurred. These expenses generally include integration costs, as well as legal, due diligence and other third-party transaction costs. The frequency and the amount of such expenses vary significantly based on the size, timing and complexity of the transaction. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2025 and June 30, 2024, these costs included Adenza integration costs and other strategic initiative costs. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2024, these costs were partially offset by the recognition of a termination fee due to Nasdaq in the second quarter of 2024 related to the termination of the then proposed divestiture of our Nordic power futures business. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, these costs included a repayment of this fee due to the closing of the transaction with another buyer, as designated in the settlement agreement.  
    (3) For a description of our restructuring programs, see “Restructuring Programs” in the “Non-GAAP Information” section of this earnings release.  
    (4) For the six months ended June 30, 2025, we recorded a gain on the extinguishment of debt. This gain is recorded in general, administrative and other expense in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.  
    (5) For the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, this includes accruals relating to certain legal matters, which are recorded in professional and contract services in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2024, these items primarily included the settlement of a SFSA fine, which is recorded in regulatory expense in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.  
    (6) For the six months ended June 30, 2024, we recorded a pre-tax charge as a result of settling our U.S. pension plan. The plan was terminated and partially settled in 2023, with final settlement occurring during the first quarter of 2024. The loss was recorded in compensation and benefits in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.  
    (7) U.S. GAAP operating margin equals U.S. GAAP operating income divided by revenues less transaction-based expenses.  
    (8) Non-GAAP operating margin equals non-GAAP operating income divided by revenues less transaction-based expenses.  
                         
    Nasdaq, Inc.
    Reconciliation of U.S. GAAP to Non-GAAP Operating Expenses
    (in millions)
    (unaudited)
                   
           Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended
          June 30,   June 30,   June 30,   June 30,
            2025       2024       2025       2024  
                       
    U.S. GAAP operating expenses   $ 738     $ 736     $ 1,428     $ 1,444  
    Non-GAAP adjustments:                
      Amortization expense of acquired intangible assets (1)     (122 )     (122 )     (243 )     (244 )
      Merger and strategic initiatives expense (2)     (20 )     (4 )     (44 )     (13 )
      Restructuring charges (3)     (9 )     (56 )     (15 )     (82 )
      Gain on extinguishment of debt (4)     —       —       19       —  
      Legal and regulatory matters (5)     (1 )     (13 )     (4 )     (16 )
      Pension settlement charge (6)     —       —       —       (23 )
      Other loss     (1 )     (2 )     (1 )     (2 )
      Total non-GAAP adjustments     (153 )     (197 )     (288 )     (380 )
    Non-GAAP operating expenses   $ 585     $ 539     $ 1,140     $ 1,064  
                       
                       
    (1) We amortize intangible assets acquired in connection with various acquisitions. Intangible asset amortization expense can vary from period to period due to episodic acquisitions completed, rather than from our ongoing business operations.
    (2) We have pursued various strategic initiatives and completed acquisitions and divestitures in recent years that have resulted in expenses which would not have otherwise been incurred. These expenses generally include integration costs, as well as legal, due diligence and other third-party transaction costs. The frequency and the amount of such expenses vary significantly based on the size, timing and complexity of the transaction. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2025 and June 30, 2024, these costs included Adenza integration costs and other strategic initiative costs. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2024, these costs were partially offset by the recognition of a termination fee due to Nasdaq in the second quarter of 2024 related to the termination of the then proposed divestiture of our Nordic power futures business. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, these costs included a repayment of this fee due to the closing of the transaction with another buyer, as designated in the settlement agreement.
    (3) For a description of our restructuring programs, see “Restructuring Programs” in the “Non-GAAP Information” section of this earnings release.
    (4) For the six months ended June 30, 2025, we recorded a gain on the extinguishment of debt. This gain is recorded in general, administrative and other expense in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
    (5) For the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, this includes accruals relating to certain legal matters, which are recorded in professional and contract services in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2024, these items primarily included the settlement of a SFSA fine, which is recorded in regulatory expense in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
    (6) For the six months ended June 30, 2024, we recorded a pre-tax charge as a result of settling our U.S. pension plan. The plan was terminated and partially settled in 2023, with final settlement occurring during the first quarter of 2024. The loss was recorded in compensation and benefits in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
                       
    Nasdaq, Inc.
    Reconciliation of Organic Impacts for Revenues less transaction-based expenses, Non-GAAP Operating Expenses,
    Non-GAAP Operating Income, and Non-GAAP Diluted Earnings Per Share
    (in millions, except per share amounts)
    (unaudited)
                                   
                                   
      Three Months Ended   Total Variance   Other Impacts (1)   Adjusted/Organic
    Impact     (2)
      June 30, 2025   June 30, 2024   $   %   $   %   $   %
    CAPITAL ACCESS PLATFORMS                              
    Data and Listing Services revenues $ 198   $ 187   $ 11   6 %   $ 3   2 %   $ 8   5 %
    Index revenues   196     167     29   17 %     —   — %     29   17 %
    Workflow and Insights revenues   133     127     6   5 %     1   1 %     5   5 %
    Total Capital Access Platforms revenues   527     481     46   10 %     4   1 %     42   9 %
                                   
    FINANCIAL TECHNOLOGY                              
    Financial Crime Management Technology revenues   81     67     14   20 %     —   — %     14   20 %
    Regulatory Technology revenues   104     95     9   10 %     —   (1 )%     9   11 %
    Capital Markets Technology revenues   279     258     21   8 %     —   — %     21   8 %
    Total Financial Technology revenues   464     420     44   10 %     —   — %     44   10 %
                                   
    Solutions revenues (3)   991     901     90   10 %     4   — %     86   10 %
                                   
    Market Services, net revenues   306     250     56   22 %     4   2 %     52   21 %
                                   
    Other revenues   9     8     1   5 %     —   3 %     1   1 %
                                   
    Revenues less transaction-based expenses $ 1,306   $ 1,159   $ 147   13 %   $ 8   1 %   $ 139   12 %
                                   
    Non-GAAP Operating Expenses $ 585   $ 539   $ 46   9 %   $ 5   1 %   $ 41   8 %
                                   
    Non-GAAP Operating Income $ 721   $ 620   $ 101   16 %   $ 3   1 %   $ 98   16 %
                                   
    Non-GAAP diluted earnings per share $ 0.85   $ 0.69   $ 0.16   24 %   $ —   — %   $ 0.16   24 %
                                   
                                   
    Note: The current period percentages are calculated based on exact dollars, and therefore may not recalculate exactly using rounded numbers as presented in US$ millions. The sum of the percentage changes may not tie to the percentage change in total variance due to rounding.
    (1) Reflects the impacts from changes in foreign currency exchange rates and the impact of a divestiture within Capital Markets Technology.
    (2) Adjusted and organic period over period change are calculated by (i) removing the impact of period-over-period changes in foreign currency exchange rates (ii) adjusting for the impact of a divestiture and (iii) adjusting for the impact of AxiomSL on-premises contracts for ratable recognition for 2Q24, which was immaterial during that period. Adjusted operating results also exclude the impact of the previously announced one-time revenue benefit in our Index business in 1Q24 ($16 million), which did not have an impact on our 2Q25 period over period change but does have an impact on year to date period over period results. Adjusted and organic changes are equivalent as they include the same period over period adjustments.
    (3) Represents Capital Access Platforms and Financial Technology segments.
                                   
    Nasdaq, Inc.
    Key Drivers Detail
    (unaudited)
                     
        Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended
        June 30,   June 30,   June 30,   June 30,
          2025       2024       2025       2024  
    Capital Access Platforms              
      Annualized recurring revenues (in millions) (1) $ 1,315     $ 1,226     $ 1,315     $ 1,226  
      Initial public offerings              
      The Nasdaq Stock Market (2)   79       39       142       66  
      Exchanges that comprise Nasdaq Nordic and Nasdaq Baltic   6       5       10       6  
      Total new listings              
      The Nasdaq Stock Market (2)   194       84       364       163  
      Exchanges that comprise Nasdaq Nordic and Nasdaq Baltic (3)   6       10       15       12  
      Number of listed companies              
      The Nasdaq Stock Market (4)   4,238       4,004       4,238       4,004  
      Exchanges that comprise Nasdaq Nordic and Nasdaq Baltic (5)   1,148       1,198       1,148       1,198  
      Index              
      Number of licensed exchange traded products (6)   422       373       422       373  
      Period end ETP assets under management (AUM) tracking Nasdaq indexes (in billions) $ 745     $ 569     $ 745     $ 569  
      Total average ETP AUM tracking Nasdaq indexes (in billions) $ 663     $ 531     $ 662     $ 512  
      TTM (7) net inflows ETP AUM tracking Nasdaq indexes (in billions) $ 88     $ 53     $ 88     $ 53  
      TTM (7) net appreciation ETP AUM tracking Nasdaq indexes (in billions) $ 88     $ 115     $ 88     $ 115  
                     
    Financial Technology              
      Annualized recurring revenues (in millions) (1)              
      Financial Crime Management Technology $ 308     $ 258     $ 308     $ 258  
      Regulatory Technology   376       338       376       338  
      Capital Markets Technology   932       846       932       846  
      Total Financial Technology $ 1,616     $ 1,442     $ 1,616     $ 1,442  
                     
    Market Services              
      Equity Derivative Trading and Clearing              
      U.S. equity options              
      Total industry average daily volume (in millions)   52.5       42.1       53.0       42.7  
      Nasdaq PHLX matched market share   9.6 %     9.9 %     9.4 %     10.1 %
      The Nasdaq Options Market matched market share   4.3 %     5.5 %     4.7 %     5.4 %
      Nasdaq BX Options matched market share   1.7 %     2.3 %     1.7 %     2.3 %
      Nasdaq ISE Options matched market share   6.6 %     6.9 %     6.7 %     6.6 %
      Nasdaq GEMX Options matched market share   4.4 %     2.6 %     4.0 %     2.6 %
      Nasdaq MRX Options matched market share   2.8 %     2.1 %     2.8 %     2.3 %
      Total matched market share executed on Nasdaq’s exchanges   29.4 %     29.3 %     29.3 %     29.3 %
      Nasdaq Nordic and Nasdaq Baltic options and futures              
      Total average daily volume of options and futures contracts   223,450       251,677       240,133       246,527  
                     
      Cash Equity Trading              
      Total U.S.-listed securities              
      Total industry average daily share volume (in billions)   18.4       11.8       17.1       11.8  
      Matched share volume (in billions)   158.4       119.3       295.5       236.0  
      The Nasdaq Stock Market matched market share   13.5 %     15.6 %     13.8 %     15.7 %
      Nasdaq BX matched market share   0.3 %     0.3 %     0.3 %     0.3 %
      Nasdaq PSX matched market share   0.1 %     0.2 %     0.1 %     0.2 %
      Total matched market share executed on Nasdaq’s exchanges   13.9 %     16.1 %     14.2 %     16.2 %
      Market share reported to the FINRA/Nasdaq Trade Reporting Facility   47.7 %     42.9 %     47.9 %     42.2 %
      Total market share (8)   61.6 %     59.0 %     62.1 %     58.4 %
      Nasdaq Nordic and Nasdaq Baltic securities              
      Average daily number of equity trades executed on Nasdaq’s exchanges   804,121       663,897       796,426       665,183  
      Total average daily value of shares traded (in billions) $ 5.7     $ 4.7     $ 5.5     $ 4.7  
      Total market share executed on Nasdaq’s exchanges (9)   71.9 %     74.1 %     71.2 %     73.3 %
                     
                     
      (1) Annualized Recurring Revenue (ARR) for a given period is the current annualized value derived from subscription contracts with a defined contract value. This excludes contracts that are not recurring, are one-time in nature, or where the contract value fluctuates based on defined metrics. ARR is currently one of our key performance metrics to assess the health and trajectory of our recurring business. ARR does not have any standardized definition and is therefore unlikely to be comparable to similarly titled measures presented by other companies. ARR should be viewed independently of revenue and deferred revenue and is not intended to be combined with or to replace either of those items. For AxiomSL and Calypso recurring revenue contracts, the amount included in ARR is consistent with the amount that we invoice the customer during the current period. Additionally, for AxiomSL and Calypso recurring revenue contracts that include annual values that increase over time, we include in ARR only the annualized value of components of the contract that are considered active as of the date of the ARR calculation. We do not include the future committed increases in the contract value as of the date of the ARR calculation. ARR is not a forecast and the active contracts at the end of a reporting period used in calculating ARR may or may not be extended or renewed by our customers.
      (2) New listings include IPOs, issuers that switched from other listing venues, closed-end funds and separately listed ETPs. For the three months ended June 30, 2025 and 2024, IPOs included 41 and 8 SPACs, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2025 and 2024, IPOs included 59 and 13 SPACs, respectively.
      (3) New listings include IPOs and represent companies listed on the Nasdaq Nordic and Nasdaq Baltic exchanges and companies on the alternative markets of Nasdaq First North.
      (4) Number of total listings on The Nasdaq Stock Market for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025 and 2024 included 914 and 645 ETPs, respectively.
      (5) Represents companies listed on the Nasdaq Nordic and Nasdaq Baltic exchanges and companies on the alternative markets of Nasdaq First North.
      (6) The number of listed ETPs as of June 30, 2024 has been updated to reflect a revised methodology whereby an ETP listed on multiple exchanges is counted as one product, rather than formerly being counted per exchange. This change had no impact on reported AUM.
      (7) Trailing 12-months.
      (8) Includes transactions executed on The Nasdaq Stock Market’s, Nasdaq BX’s and Nasdaq PSX’s systems plus trades reported through the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority/Nasdaq Trade Reporting Facility.
      (9) European cash equities markets include cash equities exchanges of Sweden, Denmark, Finland, and Iceland. Minor adjustments to prior periods reflect data from a new consolidated data provider that accurately captures all primary trading venues and Multilateral Trading Facilities, or MTFs.
                     

    The MIL Network –

  • MIL-OSI: Quality Clouds Launches AI Quality Shield for Technology Services Companies to Empower Enterprise Clients with AI Readiness and Orchestration

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    LONDON, July 24, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Quality Clouds, a provider of software governance solutions trusted by companies like JPMorgan Chase, Shell, Barclays, and BP, today announced the launch of AI Quality Shield, a new governance suite designed to assist technology services leaders in achieving successful AI transformations for their enterprise clients. This broadens Quality Clouds’ established software governance toolset to address the growing demand for enterprise AI readiness and growth.

    While the potential of AI is widely acknowledged, many enterprise AI initiatives have yet to deliver substantial impact. Recent industry reports highlight this challenge, with Accenture disclosing that only 15% of companies are “AI reinvention-ready” and McKinsey noting that only 1% of enterprises view their generative AI strategies as mature. This “Gen AI Paradox” underscores a critical need for a robust foundation to scale AI effectively.

    Technology services companies agree that enterprise clients need to reengineer their digital foundation of technology and processes to build the necessary capabilities, security, and organizational trust for an effective AI journey.

    Recognizing that governance is a major component of this AI-ready foundation, AI Quality Shield automates governance across key phases of AI transformations:

    • Readiness: Quality Clouds provides environment diagnostics and assessment scoring, enabling partners and their clients to safely prepare for AI adoption.
    • Growth: The suite offers ongoing governance, helping end-customers confidently deploy and evolve AI systems at scale.

    “Forward-thinking technology services companies are developing programs to help their enterprise clients transition into AI-first businesses,” said Adrian Serle, Chief Executive Officer of Quality Clouds. “Our new AI Quality Shield builds upon our legacy of enterprise software governance to provide our partners with the AI Readiness and Growth automation necessary to accelerate outcomes and achieve the transformative goals for their clients.”

    About Quality Clouds

    Quality Clouds provides an industry-leading independent governance layer for enterprise software platforms, empowering organizations to manage and mitigate risk across their DevOps and AI initiatives. Trusted by Fortune 500 companies and leading technology services providers, Quality Clouds’ solutions offer comprehensive visibility into code, configuration, and technical debt. By extending its capabilities to include AI readiness and ongoing governance, Quality Clouds empowers enterprises to achieve secure, compliant, and scalable innovation throughout their DevOps and AI transformation journeys.

    QualityClouds.com/aiqualityshield

    A video accompanying this announcement is available at https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/44735b9c-dff2-4ed9-a98e-31ff72c335cf

    The MIL Network –