Category: Australia

  • MIL-OSI Submissions: Asia Pacific – Attraction of the ASEAN Economic Sphere: Japanese Companies Transferring Production from China to Southeast Asia – The Shared Future of Asia and Japan

    Source: Japan Connect

    An increasing number of Japanese companies operating in China are transferring their production bases to countries in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). This comes as Chinese economic growth slows and concerns rise over the risks of doing business in China, where foreign residents have been arrested on vague grounds.

    Chinese real estate slump: Apartment buildings in Guizhou, China. (c) Jiji Press.
    The Chinese economy is stagnating, and this can clearly be seen in production, consumption and investments. The country’s gross domestic product (GDP) for the second quarter (April-June) of 2024 grew 4.7% year over year, which was 0.6 points lower than the first quarter (January-March). Economic data from August shows that retail business sales, an indicator of consumption trends, grew only 2.1% year over year.

    The slump in the real estate industry is a major factor behind this. The real estate market and related industries make up a fourth of China’s GDP, but investments in real estate development fell 10.2% year over year in the period between January and August 2024. During the COVID-19 pandemic, China implemented a “Zero-COVID Strategy,” which kept citizens indoors, dealt a major blow to the tourism and restaurant industries, and led to investments being concentrated in real estate. Home prices rose exponentially. In response, the Chinese government placed heavy restrictions on risky deals. This caused home prices to drop drastically, and the businesses of many major real estate developers fell into a decline. Down payments were made but buildings never got built, and as similar cases followed one after another, the consumption trend cooled among the population.

    Furthermore, the Chinese government, which places utmost importance on national security, established the Counter Espionage Law in 2014. This has resulted in many foreigners, including Japanese, being arrested for “espionage acts,” which are only vaguely defined. Starting in July 2024, new regulations have been implemented that allow authorities to inspect the contents of electronic devices of individuals and organizations for acts of espionage, raising further concerns that even regular economic activities could be scrutinized. With little hope for significant growth in the Chinese market, coupled with the risks of doing business in China, direct international investments into the country fell 29.1% year over year between January and June 2024. There are also other issues, such as the risk of high tariffs on products produced in China and exported to the USA due to the ongoing tension between the two countries, as well as rising labor costs in China.

    Against this backdrop, Japanese companies are turning their eyes to Southeast Asia for new bases of production. In January 2023, Sony transferred the manufacturing of its cameras for Japan, Europe and the USA from China to Thailand. Its factories in China now only make products to be sold domestically, allowing it to reduce dependency on the country. Kyocera also plans to transfer a part of its electric tools production in China to Vietnam in fiscal 2024. The Vietnam site will mainly manufacture products to be sold in the USA in order to avoid the tariffs placed on exports from China. According to Teikoku Databank, the number of Japanese companies operating in China decreased from 14,394 in 2012 to 13,034 in 2023. Many companies are choosing to relocate back to Japan or to Southeast Asia. This can be seen in how Southeast Asian countries now occupy three of the top five locations in terms of the number of Japanese companies’ overseas subsidiaries: No. 1 is China, followed by USA, Thailand, Singapore, and Vietnam.

    Southeast Asia is attractive in many ways for Japanese companies. Not only is it geographically close to Japan but it also offers a rich pool of human resources with technical prowess and fluency in many languages including English, which allows companies to secure a stable labor force. Many ASEAN countries also have highly transparent fiscal policies and stable currency exchange rates. Cities have established solid infrastructure such as electrical power and transportation networks, making it easier for companies to build factories there and secure supply chains, from production and distribution to sales.

    The Southeast Asian market is very appealing. The 10 ASEAN countries have a combined population of around 670 million people. It tops the population of the European Union (EU), which is around 450 million people, and is the third largest in the world after India and China. The median age is also young, and unlike many developed nations, the region has not yet been faced with the issue of an aging society with a low birthrate. The 2023 nominal GDP of the 10 ASEAN countries combined rose to around 3.81 trillion US dollars, which ranks right after the USA, China, Germany and Japan. It is forecast to overtake Japan’s GDP by 2030. Due to the effects of an aging population and low birthrate, there are concerns that Japan’s market and labor force will shrink going forward. Japanese companies will benefit greatly from operating and expanding their businesses in Southeast Asia, which has a large market, offers rich human resources and is referred to as “the world’s growth center.”

    Japan and ASEAN countries have established various cooperative partnerships in politics, foreign policy and the economy. Japan is an active participant in numerous ASEAN foreign policy and security frameworks, including the East Asia Summit (EAS), which started in Malaysia in 2005, ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF), which discusses political and security issues, and ASEAN Defence Ministers’ Meeting Plus (ADMM-Plus), the only formal meeting of defense ministers in the Asia-Pacific region. In 2020, the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) was officially signed, including Japan, China, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand in addition to ASEAN. Building an open economic sphere by providing market access and establishing economic rules is accelerating active free trade, including small and medium-sized businesses.

    While Southeast Asia is attractive to Japan, Japan must also be attractive to Southeast Asia. Southeast Asian company managers often say that decisionmaking is slow in Japanese businesses. They say this is due to a uniquely Japanese custom where multiple meetings are needed to make a single decision, and everyone has to then wait for it to be approved by the head office in Japan. Furthermore, Southeast Asians who grew up loving Japanese brands and anime are already in their 40s and 50s, while the attention of the younger generation, which is driving consumption, has been turning to South Korean and Chinese cultures as well. As such, greater efforts must be made to ensure that Southeast Asia will choose Japan as a partner.

    Last year, Japan and ASEAN celebrated their 50th anniversary of cooperative partnerships. The relationship, in fact, began as one of animosity. Japan drew the ire of Southeast Asia by exporting massive quantities of cheap synthetic rubber to ASEAN, a producer of natural rubber, and that led to holding the ASEAN-Japan forum on synthetic rubber in 1973. Friendly relations were established as Japan promised to take care not to interfere with ASEAN’s natural rubber industry. It was a perfect example of the proverb “After rain comes fair weather.” One could call 2024 the first year of the next half-century of new cooperative partnerships. Going forward, Japan’s efforts will determine how strong this partnership with ASEAN will become.

    By Akio Yaita – Journalist. Graduated from the Faculty of Letters at Keio University. After completing his doctorate at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, he worked as a correspondent for the Sankei Shimbun in Beijing and as Taipei bureau chief. Author or co-author of many books.

    MIL OSI – Submitted News

  • MIL-Evening Report: Is Australia’s trade war with China now over? The answer might be out of our hands

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Peter Draper, Professor, and Executive Director: Institute for International Trade, and Jean Monnet Chair of Trade and Environment, University of Adelaide

    YULIYAPHOTO/Shutterstock

    Finally, Australia’s rock lobster industry will be able to export to China again, following a deal struck on the sidelines of the ASEAN summit in Laos last week.

    It will take some weeks to finalise the paperwork, but Chinese diners can expect to eat our high-quality crustaceans as we devour our Christmas roast turkeys.

    The breakthrough brings a particularly nasty chapter in Australia-China trade relations to a close. Tariffs on rock lobsters were the only remaining major restriction of a raft of trade barriers imposed by China in 2020.

    It might be tempting to celebrate, but we should tread carefully. Our situation remains hostage to Beijing’s relationship with Washington. Whether Australia’s trade woes with China are actually over may ultimately be out of our hands.




    Read more:
    China removes block on Australian lobster, in last big bilateral trade breakthrough


    Australia’s reversal of fortunes

    The past couple of years have been a whirlwind.

    The Albanese government has seen China systematically undo the export restrictions it had imposed on Australia in 2020 – including on barley, wine, beef, and now lobster – without giving away much of substance in return.

    Yes, Australia suspended two cases it had brought against China at the World Trade Organization, concerning barley and wine duties China had imposed. But those cases can be resumed if the Chinese government backslides.

    China will resume imports of Australian lobster by the end of this year.
    Abdul Razak Latif/Shutterstock

    And true, the Albanese government did not oppose China’s bid to join the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership – an important regional free trade agreement of which Australia is a founding member. But neither did it endorse China’s bid.

    It seems we’ve come a long way since 2020, when China tabled its infamous “14 grievances” against Australia. This deliberately leaked document publicly criticised Australia on a whole range of fronts, including foreign investment decisions, alleged interference in China’s affairs, research funding and media coverage.

    A more sobering picture elsewhere

    This reopening of trade might make it seem like things are looking up for Australia. In some cases, our business community has bounced back with gusto, notably wine exports to China.

    Zooming out, however, paints a more sobering picture of global trade relations. In the near term, the decisions of our key allies – namely the United States – may come to matter more than our own.

    The Biden administration has long hoped to place a “floor” under America’s geopolitical competition with China. Neither side wants things to get ugly.

    But in Washington, strong bipartisan consensus remains that China must be confronted. The US has continued to take coercive actions against Chinese exports and investment.

    For example, the US recently imposed a 100% import duty on electric vehicles produced by Chinese-owned companies. Similarly, it imposed a 25% import duty on imports of Chinese container cranes. Strategic distrust will escalate no matter who wins the White House on November 5.

    This animosity is mirrored in Beijing. China’s security state is expanding ever more into business, while its private sector retreats. China’s own coercive activities are also escalating in regional disputes over the South and East China seas, as well as in its trade retaliations against Western markets.

    Widening tensions

    These tensions are also playing out in Europe and the Middle East. International relations scholars worry that the West must now confront an authoritarian axis comprising Russia, Iran, North Korea and China.

    China’s “no limits” partnership with Russia has spooked most European elites. Western sanctions on Russia, meant to erode the Kremlin’s war machine, are likely being circumvented by China’s unmatched industrial capacities.

    Iran’s military support for Russia supplements the Kremlin’s war-fighting capacities at Ukraine’s expense.

    Unsurprisingly, economic security concerns are rapidly eclipsing free trade considerations for the US.

    Advanced manufacturing capabilities – such as semiconductor production – are increasingly important strategic assets.
    genkur/Shutterstock

    When US National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan introduced the 2022 National Security Strategy, he adopted a selectively restrictive approach he called “small yard, high fence”.

    He was talking about export controls and inward restrictions on investment, applied to high-technology products.

    Since then, the “yard” has grown wider, and the “fence” has expanded. More sectors and products are being thrown into the mix, from energy security, through critical minerals, to food production.

    The challenge with digital technologies, able to be used for both military and civilian purposes, is that the yard can be very large indeed.

    Middle power problems

    The US has the economic and military weight to confront China. As the European Union is learning, having the economic weight is necessary. But being politically united is essential, and they remain far from that.

    Australia is a middle power, without the necessary economic weight or military heft to confront China. That means we must support the rules-based multilateral trading system – preserving the authority of institutions like the World Trade Organisation (WTO) – to constrain the actions of the great powers and preserve as much of our open trade posture as possible.

    Washington, however, increasingly expects its allies to fall into line. How else can one explain Canada’s decision to follow the US and impose 100% import duties on electric vehicles produced by Chinese owned companies?

    Like Australia, Canada is also a middle power. It is also a strong supporter of the rules-based multilateral trading system. But Canada’s action violates WTO rules.

    The fact that Washington’s actions also violate these rules is taken for granted these days.

    Australia must pay attention

    Global trade cooperation is deteriorating, and the world is fracturing into two “values-based” trading blocs. While there could be positive upswings in our bilateral trade relations with China, the medium term trend is down.

    As Napoleon Bonaparte is reputed to have said:

    China is a sleeping giant; let him sleep, for if he wakes he will shake the world.

    China has changed, and the world with it.

    Australian business needs to pay attention. Our East Asian partners, notably Japan and South Korea, have long spoken of the need for a “China plus one” (or more) business strategy – making sure trade and investment is diversified into other countries, as well.

    Such diversification will be increasingly important in the years to come.

    Peter Draper does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Is Australia’s trade war with China now over? The answer might be out of our hands – https://theconversation.com/is-australias-trade-war-with-china-now-over-the-answer-might-be-out-of-our-hands-241117

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Spotlighting seven influential women Captains

    Source: Victoria Country Fire Authority

    From L-R: Linda Krive, Gill Metz, Elizabeth Gibson, Sheryl Batrouney, Julie Hough, Jan Hull

    Seven trailblazing women leaders of CFA from the northwest of the state are helping shape the future for rural women this International Day of Rural Women.

    The significant day on 15 October each year, is a special one for CFA to celebrate and honour the dedication and contribution of all the women in our organisation.

    CFA has nearly 13,000 incredible women members, hundreds of those in leadership roles.

    Six out of seven women Captains in CFA’s District 2 gathered recently and discussed the importance of women and diversity in their brigades.

    Riddells Creek Captain Gill Metz AFSM, who is not only a long-serving volunteer but has also had a career in emergency services, said her brigade wanted her to become Captain to mentor and develop future leaders along with some succession planning.

    “A lot of the work I’m doing is about knowledge sharing and giving the volunteers different experiences,” Gill said.

    “Research has shown that having good diversity in emergency management makes us so much stronger.

    “I’ve enjoyed developing minority groups for many, many years, and certainly having more women around helps bring those skills to the table.”

    Walmer Fire Brigade Captain Julie Hough said she hopes she can inspire other people without an agenda.

    “Having a great team behind you will hopefully encourage more women to take the opportunity to take on a role with CFA,” Julie said.

    “It’s all about community, whether that is ensuring their protection or simply building rapport with them, it’s great that you can be a role model for other people.”

    Axe Creek Fire Brigade Captain Sheryl Batrouney is a third-generation firefighter so for her, she was always going to join CFA regardless of gender.

    “There’s a lot that women can bring to a brigade, no matter what role they’re interested in,” Sheryl said.

    “I encourage people if they’re wanting to be part of their community and do something that’s fun, and also very rewarding, to join their local CFA.”

    Deputy Chief Officer North East Region and International Day of Rural Women sponsor Ross Sullivan said it’s important for women to be celebrated all year round.

    “Rural women are the backbone of their communities, often juggling various responsibilities to keep everything running smoothly,” Ross said.

    “Women also play a crucial role in rural community development and throughout my career at CFA, I am endlessly impressed by the passion and commitment from our women members who put the community at the core of everything they do.

    “It’s pleasing to see how CFA has broadened its diversity over the years and implemented change to ensure we’re not only increasing our women volunteer membership, but we’re empowering them to become leaders and inspiring more women to take on any role in CFA.”

    Submitted by CFA Media

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: JACET Charges – Darwin and Palmerston

    Source: Northern Territory Police and Fire Services

    The Joint Anti-Child Exploitation Team (JACET) have charged two men with separate child exploitation offences in Darwin and Palmerston last week.

    Search warrants were conducted on separate residences in Farrar and Karama, with multiple electronic devices seized for further analysis.

    A 32-year-old man was arrested on 9 October in Farrar and has since been charged with:

    • Gross indecency with child under 14 x 1
    • Produce child abuse material x 1
    • Possess child abuse material x 1
    • Destroy evidence x 1

    He has been further remanded to appear in Darwin Local Court on 4 December 2024.

    A 26-year-old man was arrested on 11 October in Karama and has since been charged with:

    • Transmit child abuse material x 2
    • Possess or control child abuse material x 3
    • Transmit indecent communication to a child x 1

    He was further  remanded to appear in Darwin Local Court on 17 December 2024.

    Detective Acting Senior Sergeant Sarah Firth said “ The protection of children remains a priority for NT Police. Anyone participating in these crimes should know their behaviour is deplorable, and sooner or later our dedicated team will catch you.”

    Australian Federal Police (AFP) Superintendent Greg Davis said the AFP, together with its state and territory law enforcement partners, remained committed to protecting children wherever they lived.

    “Anyone who views this material is committing a crime and contributing to the harm of children. Our message to online offenders has not changed – if you procure, access and transmit child abuse material, you will be found, arrested and prosecuted,’’ Superintendent Davis said.

    “Children are not commodities to be used for the abhorrent gratification of sexual predators.”

    For online safety tips you can visit the eSafety Commissioner website for more information at https://www.esafety.gov.au/

    Members of the public who have any information about people involved in child abuse and exploitation are urged to call Crime Stoppers on 1800 333 000 or https://crimestoppers.com.au/       

    You can also make a report online by alerting the Australian Centre to Counter Child Exploitation via the ‘Report Abuse’ button at http://www.accce.gov.au/report.  

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Bendigo Writers Festival to return in 2025 following standout success

    Source: State of Victoria Local Government 2

    The Bendigo Writers Festival will return from August 15 to 17, 2025, following the standout success of the 2024 event.

    More than 6,300 attendees enjoyed 77 sessions and events across nine venues this year during the three-day event from August 16 to 18.

    The packed program featured literary giants such as Alexis Wright, Kate Grenville, Thomas Mayo, Kerry O’Brien, Bruce Pascoe, and Kate Forsyth.

    Gastronomic delights included Caroline Parker’s Edible Weed Walk of Rosalind Park, A Seat At Kon And Sia’s Table lunch event, and An Evening With Julie Goodwin dinner, all of which sold out.

    The festival’s opening gala, Up Close and Possibly Way Too Personal interview with Annabel Crabb, was also moved from The Capital to Ulumbarra Theatre to accommodate demand.

    Manager Bendigo Venues & Events Julie Amos said the City was delighted by the response to the 2024 festival.

    “The Bendigo Writers Festival is a highlight of our region’s events program each year, bringing together a veritable feast of writing and storytelling,” Ms. Amos said.

    “This year, the festival returned to its August timeslot, with a new brand, look and feel, and new events including the Big Top with local artists and performers and the Djaara Arts Market.

    “We were also pleased to make the festival more accessible, with AUSLAN interpretation available for select sessions, as well as taking the show on the road with events in Boort, Elmore and Heathcote.

    “The breakdown of our figures has revealed that 50 per cent of attendees were from the Greater Bendigo community. It’s a terrific endorsement to see such strong local support for the event.

    “40 per cent came from regional Victoria and Melbourne combined, with many visitors staying for two nights or more.

    “Thank you to La Trobe University, Bendigo Venues & Events staff and volunteers, our wonderful business and community partners, including our book shop partner Bookish, and of course those who attended the event, for making the 2024 Bendigo Writers Festival such a huge success.

    “We’re excited to start planning next year’s event, so add August 15 to 17, 2025 to your calendar now.”

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: JACET Charges – Darwin & Palmerston

    Source: Northern Territory Police and Fire Services

    The Joint Anti-Child Exploitation Team (JACET) have charged two men with separate child exploitation offences in Darwin and Palmerston last week.

    Search warrants were conducted on separate residences in Farrar and Karama, with multiple electronic devices seized for further analysis.

    A 32-year-old man was arrested on 9 October in Farrar and has since been charged with:

    •          Gross indecency with child under 14 x 1

    •          Produce child abuse material x 1

    •          Possess child abuse material x 1

    •          Destroy evidence x 1

    He has been further remanded to appear in Darwin Local Court on 4 December 2024.

    A 26-year-old man was arrested on 11 October in Karama and has since been charged with:

    •          Transmit child abuse material x 2

    •          Possess or control child abuse material x 3

    •          Transmit indecent communication to a child x 1

    He was further  remanded to appear in Darwin Local Court on 17 December 2024.

    Detective Acting Senior Sergeant Sarah Firth said “ The protection of children remains a priority for NT Police. Anyone participating in these crimes should know their behaviour is deplorable, and sooner or later our dedicated team will catch you.”

    Australian Federal Police (AFP) Superintendent Greg Davis said the AFP, together with its state and territory law enforcement partners, remained committed to protecting children wherever they lived.

    “Anyone who views this material is committing a crime and contributing to the harm of children. Our message to online offenders has not changed – if you procure, access and transmit child abuse material, you will be found, arrested and prosecuted,’’ Superintendent Davis said.

    “Children are not commodities to be used for the abhorrent gratification of sexual predators.”

    For online safety tips you can visit the eSafety Commissioner website for more information at https://www.esafety.gov.au/

    Members of the public who have any information about people involved in child abuse and exploitation are urged to call Crime Stoppers on 1800 333 000 or https://crimestoppers.com.au/       

    You can also make a report online by alerting the Australian Centre to Counter Child Exploitation via the ‘Report Abuse’ button at http://www.accce.gov.au/report.  

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Tickets out now for the Cessnock NSW Seniors Christmas Concerts

    Source: New South Wales Government 2

    Headline: Tickets out now for the Cessnock NSW Seniors Christmas Concerts

    Published: 15 October 2024

    Released by: Minister for Seniors


    Tickets for the free NSW Seniors Christmas Concerts in Cessnock are now available with seniors urged to snap them up and enjoy the festive fun.

    The NSW Seniors Christmas Concerts star singing sensations Amy Lehpamer from the musical & Juliet, Arlo Sims, Liz Player and Emily Kate, from The Voice, and Will Skarpona from the Conservatorium of Music.

    There will be two free shows at the Performance Arts Culture Cessnock on Thursday 12 December 2024 at 10am and 1pm.

    Featuring all the festive favourites, the regional concerts are an annual highlight of the Christmas season and a chance for seniors to socialise and enjoy a spectacular show.

    Tickets will be available from 11am today:

    • Online by visiting the website,
    • Call the Performance Arts Culture Cessnock Theatre box office on 02 4993 4266.
    • Visit the Performance Arts Culture Cessnock Theatre box office on the corner of Vincent Street and Aberdare Road, Cessnock, NSW, 2325.

    Free tickets are available until the allocation is exhausted. Maximum 4 per person or call venues for larger group bookings.

    Cessnock is one of three regional centres to host the Seniors Christmas Concerts this year with other shows taking place in Broken Hill and Moree.

    Each year, the NSW Seniors Christmas Concerts visit three regional towns to bring the festive cheer to seniors in the regions. They are a way for the NSW Government to thank our seniors and help them celebrate with friends and family.

    Minister for Seniors Jodie Harrison said:

    “The NSW Seniors Christmas Concerts are a wonderful way to enjoy the season, socialise and have a festive singalong with some of the state’s top performers.

    “Tickets are sure to go quickly so be certain to get your seats as soon as possible to experience this spectacular show in regional NSW.

    Local member for Cessnock Clayton Barr said:

    “I am pleased to see Cessnock is one of the three regional centres selected to be host to the Seniors Christmas Concerts. I encourage local seniors to make sure you get in early to avoid missing out.

    “There are a variety of ways to get tickets for the Cessnock Concert including online, by calling the Performance Arts Culture Cessnock (PACC) box office or you can visit the PACC box office in Vincent Street, Cessnock.

    “This is a great opportunity for all seniors in the local area to see and enjoy this spectacular show and don’t forget to sing along to your favourite Christmas tunes.”

    Performer Will Skarpona said:

    “I am looking forward to bringing the spirit of Christmas to seniors living in regional NSW.

    “The NSW Seniors Christmas Concerts are guaranteed to delight audiences so make sure you book  your tickets now.”

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: ARENA funds Australia’s first community-led electrification trial

    Source: Australian Renewable Energy Agency

    Overview

    • Category

      News

    • Date

      15 October 2024

    • Classification

    500 households in the 2515 postcode in New South Wales are set to be electrified, in a new project announced today by the Australian Renewable Energy Agency (ARENA), and partners Brighte, Rewiring Australia and Endeavour Energy.

    ARENA is providing $5.4 million in funding for the “Electrify 2515 Community Pilot” to support the electrification of 500 homes in the north Illawarra 2515 area, providing insights on how Australia could benefit from an electrified future.

    ARENA CEO Darren Miller said this project would also provide significant insight into the contribution of home electrification to grid stability while also reducing energy costs for consumers.

    “Flexible demand at a residential level is expected to be critical as homes electrify. By undertaking electrification in a managed way, we can reduce the need to upgrade our electricity network and reduce costs for all electricity consumers.”

    The main objective of the pilot is to accelerate the energy transition in homes to understand the impact on consumers and the network. This will be done by installing efficient electric appliances and other consumer energy resources (CER) including heat pump space and water heaters, home batteries, and rooftop solar that will be optimised by a home energy management system (HEMS).

    By studying the installation journey closely, the pilot will generate insights into consumer behaviour and decision-making when purchasing and using CER to better understand how to scale and commercialise home electrification.

    Brighte Founder and CEO Katherine McConnell said the pilot aimed to create the electric future in a real community today. “This project will allow us to learn locally so we can scale nationally, generating critical insights for consumers, tradespeople, industry and policymakers on how to rapidly and effectively scale electrification across Australia.

    “We’re excited about the role we can play to demonstrate the power of homes brought to their full potential, lighting a pathway for every Australian community to electrify more easily and fast-forward to a smart, electric future.”

    One of the bigger barriers to the commercialisation and widespread adoption CER is upfront cost. The funding provided by ARENA will help to support the purchase of CER for pilot participants taking part in the research program led by Rewiring Australia.

    The Electrify 2515 Community Pilot will test the impacts of electrification within a community and within the constraints of Endeavour Energy’s local electricity network. This is expected to allow the sharing of valuable insights on the impacts of residential electrification.

    Full list of project partners:

    • Project Lead, Delivery Partner & Finance Provider: Brighte
    • Research Partner: Rewiring Australia
    • Network Partner: Endeavour Energy

    ARENA Strategic Priority: Optimise the Transition to Renewable Electricity

    Australia’s electricity system is rapidly evolving. Solar and wind are now the cheapest sources of new bulk electricity supply, and significant numbers of Australian households and businesses continue to install rooftop solar and other distributed energy technologies. Grid-scale innovations are also driving the transition, including increased use of grid-scale batteries.

    New demand loads for green metals, manufacturing and fuel production, coupled with the electrification of transport and broader industry. Will create unprecedented demand for renewable energy over the next decade. We need to ensure the grid is equipped to support this additional demand and high penetration of renewables.

    Further technical and commercial innovation, as well as market reforms, will be critical to ensure the electricity system can transition efficiently, reliably and cost-effectively.

    ARENA is currently focused on supporting projects in this priority area that help deliver the following objectives:

    • Unlock new flexible demand
    • Improve the economics of energy storage
    • Optimise large-scale integration of renewable electricity

    Learn more at ARENA’s website.

    ARENA media contact:

    media@arena.gov.au

    Download this media release (PDF 128KB)

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Review of Merchant Card Payment Costs and Surcharging

    Source: Reserve Bank of Australia

    The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) is commencing its Review into Retail Payments Regulation. This review will examine the costs merchants face when accepting card payments and the framework for surcharging. The RBA has today released an Issues Paper, inviting stakeholders to provide detailed feedback on the current regulatory framework and to suggest potential regulatory responses. This feedback will be crucial in shaping future reforms to ensure a safe and efficient payments system.

    Australians extensively use cards to pay for goods and services. They benefit from the convenience and security provided by card payments. However, in an environment of heightened concern around the cost of living, card payment costs and surcharging are attracting more attention from merchants and consumers. These issues are linked, since merchants would be less likely to surcharge consumers if card payment costs were lower. It is timely, therefore, to review whether regulatory settings could be adjusted to put further downward pressure on merchant card payment costs and whether the RBA’s surcharging framework remains fit for purpose. This recognises that many years have passed since these rules first came into effect.

    Stakeholders can provide written submissions by 3 December 2024.

    Detailed assessments of reform proposals would form the next stage of this review. If the Payments System Board forms a view that consultation on regulatory action is in the public interest, the RBA will further consult on any reform proposals prior to any decisions being made.

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI Submissions: ISRAEL-GAZA: MSF mourns and condemns the tragic killing of our colleague in northern Gaza.

    SOURCE: Médecins Sans Frontières/Doctors Without Borders (MSF)

    15 October – Médecins Sans Frontières/Doctors Without Borders are mourning the loss of 31-year-old Nasser Hamdi Abdelatif Al Shalfouh, our MSF colleague.

    Nasser was killed by shrapnel injuries he suffered to his legs and chest on October 8 in Jabalia, North Gaza. 
    Since October 7, Jabalia has been under relentless attacks by Israeli forces, and people have remained trapped since then without being able to flee.

    Nasser died from his injuries on 10 October in Kamal Adwan Hospital. He is survived by his wife and two children.

    Nasser joined MSF as a driver in March 2023 and has not been working since the war started as MSF activities in North Gaza were severely affected. MSF has been trying to expand activities in the north of Gaza, but it has been impossible so far.

    After being injured, Nasser first received emergency care at Al Awda Hospital, Jabalia in North Gaza, and was later transferred to Kamal Adwan Hospital. He was unable to receive the necessary level of care due to the hospital´s lack of capacity and an overwhelming number of patients in the facility.

    All over Gaza, family members and loved ones continue to be killed and injured by relentless fighting and bombings. Nasser is the seventh MSF colleague killed in Gaza since the beginning of the war. This bloodshed needs to end.

    For over a year, Israeli forces have systematically dismantled the health system in Gaza, impeding access to life-saving care for people. At the same time, medical evacuations have become extremely challenging, particularly in the north which has been largely cut off from the rest of Gaza, further making it difficult for people to access care.

    We are horrified by the killing of our colleague which we strongly condemn, and call yet again for the respect and protection of civilians. In this tragic moment, our thoughts are with his family and all colleagues mourning his death.

    Notes

    The situation remains catastrophic in north Gaza and six MSF staff remain trapped in Jabalia camp which is still totally under siege by Israeli forces, and where humanitarian aid cannot enter. Audio testimony from an MSF colleague who fled Jabalia and who is now sheltering in Gaza City is available.

    MSF Australia was established in 1995 and is one of 24 international MSF sections committed to delivering medical humanitarian assistance to people in crisis. In 2022, more than 120 project staff from Australia and New Zealand worked with MSF on assignment overseas. MSF delivers medical care based on need alone and operates independently of government, religion or economic influence and irrespective of race, religion or gender. For more information visit msf.org.au  

    MIL OSI – Submitted News

  • MIL-OSI Economics: Review of Merchant Card Payment Costs and Surcharging

    Source: Reserve Bank of Australia

    The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) is commencing its Review into Retail Payments Regulation. This review will examine the costs merchants face when accepting card payments and the framework for surcharging. The RBA has today released an Issues Paper, inviting stakeholders to provide detailed feedback on the current regulatory framework and to suggest potential regulatory responses. This feedback will be crucial in shaping future reforms to ensure a safe and efficient payments system.

    Australians extensively use cards to pay for goods and services. They benefit from the convenience and security provided by card payments. However, in an environment of heightened concern around the cost of living, card payment costs and surcharging are attracting more attention from merchants and consumers. These issues are linked, since merchants would be less likely to surcharge consumers if card payment costs were lower. It is timely, therefore, to review whether regulatory settings could be adjusted to put further downward pressure on merchant card payment costs and whether the RBA’s surcharging framework remains fit for purpose. This recognises that many years have passed since these rules first came into effect.

    Stakeholders can provide written submissions by 3 December 2024.

    Detailed assessments of reform proposals would form the next stage of this review. If the Payments System Board forms a view that consultation on regulatory action is in the public interest, the RBA will further consult on any reform proposals prior to any decisions being made.

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Spotlight on seven influential women captains

    Source: Victoria Country Fire Authority

    From L-R: Linda Krive, Gill Metz, Elizabeth Gibson, Sheryl Batrouney, Julie Hough, Jan Hull

    Seven trailblazing women leaders of CFA from the north-west of the state are helping shape the future for rural women this International Day of Rural Women.

    The significant day on 15 October each year, is a special one for CFA to celebrate and honour the dedication and contribution of all the women in our organisation.

    CFA has nearly 13,000 incredible women members, hundreds of those in leadership roles.

    Six out of seven women Captains in CFA’s District 2 gathered recently and discussed the importance of women and diversity in their brigades.

    Riddells Creek Captain Gill Metz AFSM, who is not only a long-serving volunteer but has also had a career in emergency services, said her brigade wanted her to become Captain to mentor and develop future leaders along with some succession planning.

    “A lot of the work I’m doing is about knowledge sharing and giving the volunteers different experiences,” Gill said.

    “Research has shown that having good diversity in emergency management makes us so much stronger.

    “I’ve enjoyed developing minority groups for many, many years, and certainly having more women around helps bring those skills to the table.”

    Walmer Fire Brigade Captain Julie Hough said she hopes she can inspire other people without an agenda.

    “Having a great team behind you will hopefully encourage more women to take the opportunity to take on a role with CFA,” Julie said.

    “It’s all about community, whether that is ensuring their protection or simply building rapport with them, it’s great that you can be a role model for other people.”

    Axe Creek Fire Brigade Captain Sheryl Batrouney is a third-generation firefighter so for her, she was always going to join CFA regardless of gender.

    “There’s a lot that women can bring to a brigade, no matter what role they’re interested in,” Sheryl said.

    “I encourage people if they’re wanting to be part of their community and do something that’s fun, and also very rewarding, to join their local CFA.”

    Deputy Chief Officer North East Region and International Day of Rural Women sponsor Ross Sullivan said it’s important for women to be celebrated all year round.

    “Rural women are the backbone of their communities, often juggling various responsibilities to keep everything running smoothly,” Ross said.

    “Women also play a crucial role in rural community development and throughout my career at CFA, I am endlessly impressed by the passion and commitment from our women members who put the community at the core of everything they do.

    “It’s pleasing to see how CFA has broadened its diversity over the years and implemented change to ensure we’re not only increasing our women volunteer membership, but we’re empowering them to become leaders and inspiring more women to take on any role in CFA.”

    Submitted by CFA Media

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI China: Chinese state councilor meets Australian Senate president

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    BEIJING, Oct. 14 — Chinese State Councilor Shen Yiqin met with Sue Lines, president of the Australian Senate, in Beijing on Monday.

    Shen, also president of the All-China Women’s Federation, said that this year marks the 10th anniversary of the establishment of the China-Australia comprehensive strategic partnership.

    China is ready to work with Australia to strengthen cooperation in fields such as culture, tourism and sports, deepen exchange and experience sharing in women development, and continuously enhance the friendship between the two peoples, Shen said.

    Lines expressed the willingness to strengthen dialogue and communication with the Chinese side, carry out exchange and cooperation in various fields including women’s cause, and push for constant development of Australia-China relations.

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: G’day Australia 2024 kicks off in Perth

    Source: Minister for Trade

    Western Australia’s reputation as a key hub for international tourism continues to grow, with hundreds of international travel agents arriving in Perth for Tourism Australia’s mega-event G’Day Australia.

    Hosted in partnership with the Western Australian Government through Tourism Western Australia, G’Day Australia will bring around 300 expert travel agents from across the world to WA.

    G’Day Australia provides frontline travel sellers who have been trained by Tourism Australia – known as ‘Aussie Specialists’ – the chance to experience the country for themselves, giving them greater confidence to sell Australian holidays to international travellers.

    Agents will visit destinations across WA including Perth, Broome and Margaret River, gaining firsthand experience, greater confidence and stronger ability to sell Australia to prospective travellers.

    They will also undertake visits across the country, supported by other State and Territory Tourism Organisations.

    It is estimated that as a result of attending G’day Australia the agents will sell an additional $30 million in holidays to Australia over the next 12 months.

    Travel agents who took part in G’day Australia in Cairns last year said they intended to sell more of Australia as a result of the event, which is vital as we see our international visitor numbers return and set on a path of sustainable growth.

    The event follows the prestigious World Travel & Tourism Council (WTTC) Global Summit held in Perth last week, with more industry events in the pipeline for WA next year, including 2025 Virtuoso Australia & New Zealand Forum and Routes Asia 2025.

    G’Day Australia concludes on Friday, 18 October 2024.

    Quotes attributable to Federal Minister for Tourism Don Farrell:

    “G’day Australia plays a critical role in ensuring that Australia remains a top choice with international travellers – and what better destination for this year’s event than our country’s spectacular West.

    “Travel agents who see for themselves what we have to offer are able to use those lived experiences to better sell Australia as the best destination for their customers next holiday.

    “Having hundreds of Aussie Specialists selling trips to Australia in our key markets helps give us an important edge over other destinations around the world, which supports our world-class tourism industry, Australian jobs and our economy.”

    Quotes attributable to WA Deputy Premier and Minister for Tourism Rita Saffioti:

    “Off the back of a huge week with the World Tourism and Travel Council Global Summit being hosted here in Perth, we’re backing it up with G’Day Australia, which presents another great opportunity to showcase Western Australia.

    “Events like G’Day Australia are really important in giving hundreds of global travel agents and industry leaders firsthand experience of some of our best tourism assets here in WA, and ultimately, helping them to better promote and sell WA holiday packages to travellers.

    “We’re confident that everyone who visits WA as part of G’Day Australia will be taken back by our incredible tourism offerings and natural landscapes, and feel inspired to share these experiences with their clients.

    “Perth continues to go from strength to strength as a tourism, aviation and investment hub, and we’ll continue that momentum in particular as we get set to welcome non-stop services from China in November.”

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Race Discrimination Commissioner condemns neo-Nazi rally in regional NSW

    Source: Australian Human Rights Commission

    Australia’s Race Discrimination Commissioner, Giridharan Sivaraman, has condemned the neo-Nazi rally held in regional New South Wales on the weekend, warning it is further proof of the urgent need for a national strategy to combat racism. 

    Roughly 50 masked people, all dressed in black and brandishing a neo-Nazi banner, gathered and marched on Saturday in the small town of Corowa – which sits on the NSW-Victoria border. NSW Police said it is investigating the incident, with the rally widely condemned by local, state and federal leaders. 

    “The neo-Nazi rally in Corowa was a shock to many, particularly residents. But to those of us who have been following the rise of the far-right in the last few years, it sadly wasn’t that surprising,” said Commissioner Sivaraman. 

    “This is what happens when we refuse to properly name and confront the extent of racism that is ingrained across our society. These rallies are a horrific manifestation of what happens when racism is normalised – to the extent that neo-Nazis are emboldened to be on the streets as a threatening force. 

    “As I have repeatedly stated, race and power are interlinked. If you are white in Australia, you have power and privilege to know that institutions and systems were built by people like you, for people like you. But for far-right groups, as we are seeing both in Australia and globally, any challenge to that is met with vile hate and acts of violence.  

    “White supremacy is a threat that must be taken seriously. We should never forget that the worst mass murder in recent history committed by an Australian was a white supremacist in Christchurch, New Zealand in 2019. Politicians need to be careful their language does not denigrate one community over another or embolden neo-Nazis to openly march on our streets. Australian media also needs to be careful about which ideologies it platforms.  

    “If we really want to target these and other similar threats, the only way forward is national anti-racism action that addresses the roots of white supremacy and all forms of racism in Australia. It is the ultimate antidote to racism and its violence. By taking anti-racism action, equality, dignity and respect may one day be a reality for everyone in Australia – no matter a person’s racial, cultural or religious background.” 

    On 26 November, the Australian Human Rights Commission will release its National Anti-Racism Framework – calling on the Commonwealth to lead national, urgent action on anti-racism. This Thursday, the Commission will also release the findings of nationwide consultations with people with lived experience of racism. Those findings will help inform the development of the Framework. 

    ENDS | Media contact: media@humanrights.gov.au or 0457 281 897 

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Albanese Government opens consultation on review of artificial intelligence and the Australian Consumer Law

    Source: Australian Treasurer

    The Albanese Government is committed to ensuring consumers can safely enjoy the benefits of new and emerging artificial intelligence (AI) technologies.

    Australian consumers and businesses are increasingly accessing services and purchasing goods powered by AI.

    As part of the Government’s work to support safe and responsible AI practices we’re releasing a discussion paper on AI and the Australian Consumer Law (ACL).

    The discussion paper explores the application of the ACL to AI‑enabled goods and services and is part of the Government’s ongoing work to strengthen existing laws to address risks and harms from AI, alongside possible mandatory guardrails shaping the development and use of AI in high risk settings.

    The discussion paper seeks stakeholder views on issues including:

    • the appropriateness of existing consumer protections under the ACL for consumers of AI‑enabled goods and services,
    • the application of existing ACL provisions to new and emerging AI‑enabled goods and services, and
    • remedies for consumers and liability for suppliers and manufacturers of AI‑enabled goods and services where things go wrong.

    Interested stakeholders are encouraged to provide their feedback to the discussion paper by Tuesday 12 November 2024.

    Further information regarding the consultation process is available on the Treasury website.

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Allens advises Rio Tinto on US$6.7 billion Arcadium Lithium acquisition

    Source: Allens Insights

    Allens has advised Rio Tinto on the Australian aspects of its US$6.7 billion all-cash acquisition of NYSE-listed Arcadium Lithium. Allens’ alliance partner Linklaters advised Rio Tinto on the transaction more broadly as lead counsel.

    The acquisition will see Rio Tinto incorporate Arcadium’s lithium operations, making the company a global leader in energy transition commodities, including aluminium, copper, high-grade iron ore and lithium.

    ‘The acquisition of Arcadium Lithium further cements Rio Tinto as a key player in the energy transition. We are pleased to have played a part and congratulate all parties,’ said lead Partner Richard Kriedemann.

    ‘With the growing global demand for sustainable energy solutions, we anticipate sustained interest in lithium assets as mining companies continue to evolve and innovate to meet these critical needs.’

    ‘We see this as a key endorsement that the market can take a long term view of the lithium market, and we expect this may trigger further activity in the sector,’ Partner and Head of Critical Minerals Bryn Hardcastle added.

    Allens legal team

    M&A

    Richard Kriedemann (Partner), Chris Blane (Partner)

    Competition

    Carolyn Oddie (Partner)

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Recruitment activity in the Construction Industry continues to drop but remains stronger in regional areas

    Source: Australia Jobs and Skills

    Recruitment activity in the Construction Industry continues to drop but remains stronger in regional areas
    Timothy

    News and updates
    Recruitment difficulty for the construction industry is consistent with the overall trend across all industries.

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-Evening Report: The US isn’t the only country voting on Nov 5. This small Pacific nation is also holding an election – and China is watching

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Graeme Smith, Associate professor, Australian National University

    The Capitol building in the Pacific island nation of Palau.
    Erika Bisbocci

    The United States isn’t the only country with a big election on November 5. Palau, a tourism-dependent microstate in the north Pacific, will also vote for a new president, Senate and House of Delegates that day.

    Why does this election matter? Palau is one of the few remaining countries that has diplomatic relations with Taiwan.

    In addition, elections in the Pacific – and the horse-trading to form government that follows – often present a chance for China to steal an ally away from Taiwan in its efforts to further reduce the self-ruling island’s diplomatic space.

    For example, there was speculation Tuvalu could flip its allegiance from Taipei to Beijing based on the outcome of January’s election, but the government decided to remain in Taiwan’s camp.

    Another Pacific nation, Nauru, did flip from Taiwan to China in January, less than 48 hours after Taiwan’s own presidential election.

    I recently visited Palau as part of a research project examining China’s growing extraterritorial reach, and was curious to see if the balance is shifting towards Beijing in the lead-up to this year’s election.

    What’s at stake in Palau’s election?

    Palau, a nation of 16,000 registered voters, has close ties to the US. It was under US administration after the second world war and recently signed a “Compact of Free Association” with the US. Palau also has a similar presidential system of government, with a president directly elected by the people every four years.

    However, there are also some key differences: there are no political parties in Palau, nor is there any replica of the absurd Electoral College voting system.

    The archipelago also has extremely polite yard signs (“Please consider[…]”, “Please vote for […]” and “Moving forward together”). Alliances are based more on clan and kinship relations than ideology (although that’s not entirely dissimilar to the US).

    This year’s presidential race is between the “two juniors”: the incumbent, Surangel Whipps Junior, and the challenger, Tommy Remengensau Junior. If either man were facing a different opponent, he would win easily. Nearly all of Palau’s political insiders deem this contest too close to call.

    Whipps has been in office since 2021. Accompanied by his beloved father, a former president of the Senate and speaker of the House in Palau, he is expected to door-knock each household at least four times.

    Remengensau isn’t a political newbie, either. He’s been president for 16 of Palau’s 30 years as an independent state. In the comments section of the YouTube live feed of a recent presidential debate, one person asked, “you’ve had four terms, how many more do you need?”

    Whipps copped flak for his tax policy, but the comments and the debate itself reached Canadian levels of politeness. As the debate wound up, the rivals embraced warmly – befitting their closeness (they are actually brothers-in-law) and their lack of discernible ideological differences.

    2024 Palau presidential debate.

    A ‘pro-Beijing’ candidate in the race?

    However, there is one issue that has the potential to drive a wedge between the two candidates: the China–Taiwan rivalry.

    In a recent article for the Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI), Remengensau was described as a “pro-Beijing” candidate who might be inclined to switch Palau’s diplomatic relations to Beijing, cheered on by the “China-sympathetic” national newspaper, Tia Belau.

    Remengensau’s reaction to the ASPI piece was genuine fury, and aside from a few fly-in lobbyists from the US, no one in the country has taken the characterisation seriously. Yes, he is less pro-US than Whipps, reciting the “friends to all, enemies to none” mantra beloved by Pacific leaders in the debate. But that’s some distance from being “pro-Beijing”.

    Other outside commentators have also weighed in with similar viewpoints. Recent pieces by right-wing think tanks, the Heritage Foundation and the Federation for the Defence of Democracies, have pushed a similar line that every Pacific nation is just “one election away from a [People’s Republic of China]-proxy assuming power and dismantling democracy”.

    What’s really behind concerns of Chinese influence

    The basis for both allegations in the ASPI piece is a fascinating investigation by the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP). The story detailed an influence attempt led by a local businessman from China, Hunter Tian, to set up a media conglomerate in Palau with the owner of the newspaper Tia Belau, a man named Moses Uludong. (I played a small part in the investigation.)

    The proposed conglomerate had eyebrow-raising links to China’s secret police and military. But COVID killed the deal, and today, the newspaper runs press releases from Taiwan’s embassy without changing a word.

    Palau’s media is also ranked as the most free in the Pacific, and Tia Belau is a central part of this healthy media ecosystem.

    Uludong is a pragmatic businessman who’s no simple cheerleader for Beijing, explaining to OCCRP’s journalists last year:

    The Chinese, they have a way of doing business. They are really not open.

    This doesn’t mean Chinese operations in Palau will stop, though. Representatives of the Chinese government like Tian, who is the president of the Palau Overseas Chinese Federation and has impressive family links to the People’s Liberation Army, will keep trying to influence Palau’s elites and media.

    Evidence uncovered by Palau’s media suggests some of their elites are vulnerable to capture. In recent months, the immigration chief stepped down for using his position “for private gain or profit”, while the speaker of the House of Delegates was ordered to pay US$3.5 million (A$5.2 million) for a tax violation, in part due to an irregular lease to a Chinese national.

    Chinese triads are also now involved in scam compounds and drug trafficking in Palau, which has done little to burnish China’s image among Palauans.

    Playing into China’s hands

    So, can we expect a dramatic Palau diplomatic flip after November’s election? Not anytime soon.

    But labelling respected leaders and media outlets as “pro-Beijing” with no basis, and fabricating a Manichean struggle in a nation where there’s plenty of goodwill for the US, won’t cause China’s boosters in Palau to lose sleep.

    Egging on US agencies to “do something” to counter Chinese influence in the Pacific, such as a poorly thought-out influence operation run by the Pentagon in the Philippines during the pandemic, will just play into Beijing’s hands. In the Pacific, secrets don’t stay secret for long. And if you call someone “pro-China” for long enough, one day you might get your wish.

    Graeme Smith works for the Australian National University’s Department of Pacific Affairs, which is partially funded by DFAT through the Pacific Research Programme.

    ref. The US isn’t the only country voting on Nov 5. This small Pacific nation is also holding an election – and China is watching – https://theconversation.com/the-us-isnt-the-only-country-voting-on-nov-5-this-small-pacific-nation-is-also-holding-an-election-and-china-is-watching-237321

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-Evening Report: The federal government has left Indigenous Treaties to the states. How are they progressing?

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Bartholomew Stanford, Lecturer in Political Science/Indigenous Politics (First Peoples), Griffith University

    Since the Voice to Parliament referendum last year, there has been a lack of leadership on Indigenous policy from the Australian government.

    With this absence, the states and territories now present greater opportunity for Indigenous groups in seeking rights recognition. This is the level where agreements are being made and Treaty proposed.

    It is important to take stock of the progress that is being made in agreement-making and Treaty in Australian states and territories. While this is an area of Indigenous policy that has been set aside of late, it has great potential to deliver self-determination for First Nations people.

    First Nations agreement-making in Australia

    Agreement-making is relatively new in the context of First Nations relations with the Australian state.

    The recognition of Indigenous land rights in law has enabled First Nations people and Australian governments to enter legally binding agreements across matters such as:

    • land use and access

    • Indigenous cultural heritage protection

    • co-management of land and sea

    • economic development

    • employment

    • resolving land claims.

    First Nations groups in Australia have made hundreds of these agreements with Australian governments at all levels.

    However, there is a type of agreement that these parties are entering that is advancing the cause more generally. They are called settlement agreements.

    What is a settlement agreement?

    Victoria and Western Australia have been signing settlement agreements with First Nations groups since 2010.

    These agreements are more comprehensive than other agreements, including terms that cover numerous matters like those listed above, and often include financial packages aimed at supporting First Nations governance institutions.

    In Victoria, settlement agreements are made under state legislation. So far, four First Nations groups have entered these agreements with the Victorian government.

    In Western Australia, three settlement agreements have been made between the WA government and First Nations under Commonwealth native title legislation. The largest of these, known as the Noongar Settlement, is worth $1.3 billion and has been characterised by legal scholars as “Australia’s first Treaty”.

    Victoria and WA are the only jurisdictions that have these agreements and there are two main reasons why they were successfully signed. The first is the success of First Nations groups in mobilising political power to lobby the state. The second is the willingness of governments to enter negotiations because of economic and political motivations.

    A crucial question is whether existing settlement agreements will form an important basis for developing Treaty in the states and territories.

    How is Treaty different?

    According to legal academics Harry Hobbs and George Williams, Treaty involves three elements:

    • recognition of First Nations as distinct polities

    • negotiation in good faith

    • a settlement that deals with claims and that enables Indigenous self-government.

    Treaties are different from other agreements, as they provide scope to recognise Indigenous sovereignty, enable some limited forms of autonomy, and create a framework for Indigenous/government relations.

    Australia has not signed treaties with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. Canada, New Zealand and the United States began signing treaties centuries ago, so why is Australia so far behind?

    There are several reasons why Indigenous treaties were never signed in Australia.

    First, Australia was colonised in different circumstances, established as a penal colony and not initially a part of European expansionism.

    In North America, numerous European powers were competing for control over the continent. The British, French, Spanish and others fought against each other and procured First Nations warriors for their military ranks through treaties.

    Trade was also a motivating factor for Treaty-making in North America. Europeans coveted the animal pelts produced by First Nations people for sale in the European fashion markets.

    Today, it is arguable that Australia stands out as uniquely opposed to Indigenous rights recognition relative to other British settler states. This idea is supported by our most recent referendum result.

    So why are Australian governments engaging in Treaty discussions now?

    What’s happening across the country?

    There is currently a combination of Indigenous political action and leverage enabled through Indigenous land rights recognition. Some governments are also beginning to see value in Indigenous Knowledge, especially with regard to environmental management.

    Treaty, however, is deeply political in Australia, and since the referendum last year it has come under increased political scrutiny and attack.

    Days after the referendum result, the Queensland Liberal National party walked back support for a state-based Treaty.

    If the LNP wins government at this month’s election (as polls are predicting), Treaty will likely be shelved.

    This move would undo the years of work the state government has undertaken as part of its Tracks to Treaty initiative.

    Victoria has made the most progress on Treaty of any Australian state or territory. This is due to the leadership of the First Peoples’ Assembly of Victoria, which has spearheaded Treaty in the state.

    A Treaty negotiation framework has been developed by the assembly and Victorian government. This will guide negotiations towards a state-wide Treaty in the near future.

    Other Australian jurisdictions have made far less progress. The referendum result seems to have stalled any momentum that existed prior.

    In the Northern Territory, there’s been no progress since the NT Treaty Commission lodged a report with government in 2022. As the newly elected Country Liberal government doesn’t support a Treaty, it won’t happen anytime soon.

    In South Australia, the First Nations Voice to Parliament is expected to lead the development of Treaty. The first election was held in March of this year, and First Nations elected members had their first meeting in June 2024.

    New South Wales recruited Treaty commissioners earlier this year. They’re now embarking on a 12-month consultation process before reporting back to government.

    Governments in Tasmania and the ACT have committed to Treaty, but haven’t made any meaningful progress yet, while WA has made no formal commitment.

    Where to from here?

    Although there are notable setbacks emerging from the referendum result, it has not discouraged First Nations from working towards agreements and Treaty with Australian governments.

    With the proliferation of native title determinations, there is grounds for agreement-making, whether that be through settlement agreements or Treaty.

    There is also growing interest in how Indigenous Knowledge can inform our responses to climate change, food security and foreign relations. Accessing this knowledge will require governments to formalise relations with First Nations through agreements.

    Bartholomew Stanford does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. The federal government has left Indigenous Treaties to the states. How are they progressing? – https://theconversation.com/the-federal-government-has-left-indigenous-treaties-to-the-states-how-are-they-progressing-240552

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI Australia: $21.7 million boost for local roads in South Australia

    Source: Australian Ministers 1

    The Albanese Labor Government continues to support local governments across South Australia improve road safety and reduce long-term road maintenance, with $21.7 million flowing to 34 projects under the latest round of the Special Local Roads Program.

    Unique to South Australia, the program enables the state’s 68 councils to pool together a portion of their federal road funding – and distribute it through competitive grants.

    This supports the delivery of high priority projects that would otherwise exceed an individual council’s capacity – with $17.9 million from this round flowing to regional and rural roads, and $3.8 million to metro projects.

    Stretching from the Lower Eyre Peninsula to the Limestone Coast, projects will improve road safety, boost tourism access to key parts of the state, and help reduce congestion.

    Works will include resealing and reconstruction of roads, shoulder widening, and improvements to kerbs and gutters.

    This includes $993,000 to complete the third and final stage of the Billiatt Road reconstruction in the District Council of Loxton Waikerie.

    As the gateway to the Billiatt Conservation Park and the main tourism route in the region, the works will seal and widen the road from 6.2 metres to 7.6 metres to accommodate increased traffic, including road trains.

    Improving the safety of Hawker Street, Brompton is something the local community has long called for – with $600,000 flowing to the City of Charles Sturt to reconstruct the road, and to upgrade street lighting.

    The City of Holdfast Bay will receive $200,000 to improve the safety of the emu school crossing on Partridge Street, Glenelg and to upgrade the roundabout at Colley Terrace and Anzac Highway, which will reduce congestion.

    Nationally, the Albanese Government is delivering significant funding increases to support local councils deliver their priority projects. 

    The Roads to Recovery program is progressively increasing from $500 million to $1 billion per year, with South Australian councils receiving $395 million over five years – an increase of $153 million.

    The Road Black Spot Program is increasing to $150 million per year, and $200 million per year is available under our new Safer Local Roads and Infrastructure Program – with both programs open for applications year-round.

    For more information on the Special Local Roads Program, administered by LGA South Australia, visit: http://www.lga.sa.gov.au/members/infrastructure-and-assets/special-local-roads-program

    For the full list of 2024-25 funded projects, visit: https://www.dit.sa.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/1396195/special_local_roads_program_2024-25.pdf

    Quotes attributable to Federal Minister for Regional Development and Local Government, the Hon Kristy McBain MP:

    “The Albanese Government continues to turn national funding into local results, by partnering with local councils across South Australia to deliver their priority road projects.

    “This $21.7 million will improve the safety of local road networks across the state, making it easier to drop the kids off at school, and for tourists to experience everything that South Australia has to offer.

    “We know that roads across regional South Australia are not only under more demand than ever, but critical to keeping our supply chains moving – which is why the bulk of this round’s investment is targeting high-priority regional upgrades.” 

    Quotes attributable to SA Minister for Infrastructure and Transport, the Hon Tom Koutsantonis MP:

    “We welcome any initiative designed to help councils reduce the maintenance task on local government owned roads.

    “This innovative funding solution from the Australian Government will support councils in maintaining and improving South Australia’s critical local roads network – and that will provide a broader benefit that extends beyond individual council areas.”

    Quotes attributable to SA Minister for Local Government, the Hon Joe Szakacs MP:

    “South Australian councils, particularly smaller, regional councils, are constantly balancing service and infrastructure delivery against the growth of rates. 

    “Through these merit based grants councils have a chance to undertake important road improvements they wouldn’t otherwise be able to afford.

    “This is a terrific initiative, unique to South Australia, that sees all three levels of government working hand-in-hand to deliver the best outcomes for South Australians.”

    Quotes attributable to Local Government Association South Australia President, Mayor Dean Johnson:

    “Councils do an incredible job improving and maintaining South Australia’s local road network, but it’s a costly process that’s reliant on support from other levels of government.

    “The $21.7 million allocated through the Special Local Roads Program this year – which the LGA is pleased to facilitate for our councils – will help enhance liveability in local communities and make our roads safer and more accessible.”

    Quotes attributable to District Council of Loxton Waikerie Mayor, Trevor Norton:

    “The Billiatt Road project has been ongoing for several years and we’re extremely excited to enter the final stage.

    “These works have been made possible by previous Special Local Roads Program funding and we’re grateful to again be a recipient under this latest round to complete the vital reconstruction of the road for our community and visitors to our region.

    “Once finished, Billiatt Road will be better equipped to handle increased freight and tourist traffic, making it safer for locals, workers and visitors travelling to and from the Riverland.”

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: PIANZEA Network Senior Officials come together in the Kingdom of Tonga [15 October 2024]

    Source: Australian Electoral Commission

    AECMedia

    Updated: 15 October 2024

    Election officials from across the Pacific came together in Nuku’alofa, Kingdom of Tonga last week to discuss the shared challenges of running elections in the region.

    The meeting of PIANZEA – a network of electoral administrators from the Pacific Islands, Australia, and New Zealand – is happening at a particularly interesting time, with over half of the world’s population going to the polls in 2024.

    The meeting was hosted by the Electoral Commission, Kingdom of Tonga, and opened by His Royal Highness the Crown Prince of Tonga Tupouto’a ‘Ulukalala, who said he was “Here to join you to open the PIANZEA 2024 Senior Officials Meeting.”

    His Royal Highness observed that global transfers of power were not always peaceful and emphasised the importance of coming together in support of democracy.

    Chairman of the Electoral Commission of the Kingdom of Tonga, Rt. Hon. Lord Dalgety K.C. spoke about the importance of regional forums such as PIANZEA for democracy.

    “We must strive to keep their [the public’s] faith in what we do.” Lord Dalgety said.

    “Democracy has prevailed in all of our countries due to meetings such as this and PIANZEA training programs.”

    PIANZEA Chair and Australia’s Deputy Electoral Commissioner, Jeff Pope, said, “PIANZEA members are responding to the shared challenges all election management bodies face globally delivering elections in complex environments.”

    “PIANZEA is proud of the strong and enduring partnership between election management bodies in the Pacific, and the AEC is proud of Australia’s role in supporting the Network.”

    Electoral management bodies (EMBs) from 13 countries participated in the meeting, covering a range of topics crucial to the delivery of free and fair elections in the region.

    Background information

    The PIANZEA Network (an acronym for Pacific Islands, Australia, and New Zealand Electoral Administrators) is comprised of EMBs from Australia, Cook Islands, Fiji, Kiribati, Republic of the Marshall Islands, Federated States of Micronesia, Nauru, New Zealand, Niue, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Tonga, Tokelau, Tuvalu, Vanuatu, and Timor-Leste (associate member). The Office of the Bougainville Electoral Commissioner (OBEC) are included in activities.

    The Network was established on 10 October 1997 in Fiji. The Warwick Declaration founding document states:

    [We] hereby unanimously and collectively declare that it is indeed our joint commitment to continue and maintain in the Pacific spirit, a close association of Pacific Electoral Administrators with a view to establishing a networking arrangement to facilitate and encourage the free flow of electoral information among member countries and to provide assistance where possible.

    The PIANZEA Network is deeply valued by its members, respected across the Pacific, and is looked upon as a best practice model by other regions. Through PIANZEA, the Pacific region has a strong network of electoral administrators who are promoting democracy and good governance.

    The Australian Electoral Commission has managed the PIANZEA Network Program for over twenty-five years, with the support of the Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade.

    More information about the PIANZEA Network is available at http://www.pianzea.org

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI China: China’s top legislator holds talks with Australian Senate president

    Source: China State Council Information Office

    Zhao Leji, chairman of the National People’s Congress Standing Committee, holds talks with President of the Australian Senate Sue Lines at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing, capital of China, Oct. 14, 2024. [Photo/Xinhua]

    China’s top legislator, Zhao Leji, held talks with President of the Australian Senate Sue Lines in Beijing on Monday.

    At present, dialogue in various fields between the two countries is being resumed and promoted in an orderly manner, and practical cooperation and people-to-people exchange are also becoming increasingly active, said Zhao, chairman of the National People’s Congress (NPC) Standing Committee, adding this is the hard-won result of both sides’ joint efforts and should be cherished.

    Noting that maintaining the right perception of each other is the basic prerequisite for the development of China-Australia relations, Zhao said that China hopes the Australian side will maintain a correct understanding of China, view China’s development in an objective and positive way, respect China’s core interests and major concerns, and consolidate the political foundation of bilateral relations.

    He called on the two sides to consolidate cooperation in traditional areas such as energy, mining and agriculture, expand cooperation in emerging areas such as green technology, new energy and artificial intelligence, and promote a fair, open trade and investment environment.

    The two sides should deepen cooperation in such fields as culture, education and tourism, as well as cooperation at the sub-national level, and actively promote exchange between the young people of the two countries, Zhao added.

    He said the NPC of China is willing to work with the Australian Senate to focus on implementing the important consensus reached by the leaders of the two countries, strengthen friendly exchange, and exchange experience in governance, legislation and supervision.

    Zhao said China is willing to share development opportunities with countries such as Australia, promote the global green transition and development, and foster an open world economy.

    Australia-China relations are very important, and stable, constructive bilateral relations are in the interests of both countries and the broader region, Lines said. She noted that the members of the Senate delegation in China come from different political parties and regions in Australia, but one thing they all share is that all of them hope to see the healthy development of bilateral ties.

    Noting that the stabilization and improvement of bilateral relations is encouraging, Lines said that Australia hopes the two sides will be able to promote pragmatic cooperation further in the fields of the economy and trade, the green economy, climate change, and people-to-people exchange. Open dialogue between the two sides and the improved handling of differences are conducive to achieving win-win results, she added.

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-Evening Report: Does drinking coffee while pregnant cause ADHD? Our study shows there’s no strong link

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Gunn-Helen Moen, Post-doctoral research fellow in genetic epidemiology, The University of Queensland

    Velishchuk/Shutterstock

    International guidelines recommend people limit how much coffee they drink during pregnancy. Consuming caffeine – a stimulant – while pregnant has been linked to how the baby’s brain develops.

    Some studies have shown increased coffee consumption during pregnancy is associated with the child having neurodevelopmental difficulties. These may include traits linked to attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), such as difficulties with language, motor skills, attention, hyperactivity and impulsive behaviour.

    But is coffee the cause? Our new research aimed to clear up the sometimes confusing advice about drinking coffee during pregnancy.

    We studied tens of thousands of pregnant women over two decades. The results showed – when other factors like genes and income were accounted for – no causal link between drinking coffee during pregnancy and a child’s neurodevelopmental difficulties. That means it’s safe to keep drinking your daily latte according to current recommendations.

    What we were trying to find out

    Past research has identified a link between drinking coffee during pregnancy and a child’s neurodevelopmental difficulties. But it hasn’t been able to establish caffeine as the direct cause.

    Biological changes during pregnancy reduce caffeine metabolism. This means the caffeine molecules and metabolites (the molecules produced while breaking down the caffeine) take longer to be cleared from the body.

    Additionally, past studies have shown caffeine and its by-products can cross the placenta. The fetus does not have the necessary enzymes to clear them, and so it was thought that caffeine metabolites may impact the developing baby.

    However it can be hard to identify whether coffee directly causes changes to the fetus’s brain development. Pregnant women who drink coffee may differ from those who don’t in a number of other ways. And it could be these variables – not coffee – that affect neurodevelopment.

    These variables, known as “confounding factors” might include how much people drink or smoke while pregnant, or a parent’s income and education. For example, we know people who tend to drink coffee also tend to drink more alcohol and smoke more cigarettes than those who don’t drink coffee.

    Our study aimed to look at the effect of drinking coffee on neurodevelopmental difficulties, isolated from these confounding factors.

    What we did

    We know genes play a role in how many cups of coffee a person consumes per day. Our study used genetics to compare the development of children whose mothers did and did not carry genes linked to increased coffee consumption.

    The study looked at tens of thousands of families registered in the Norwegian Mother, Father and Child Cohort Study. All pregnant women in Norway between 1999 and 2008 were invited to participate and 58,694 women took part with their child.

    Parents reported how much coffee they drank before and during pregnancy. Mothers also completed questionnaires about their child’s neurodevelopmental traits between six months and eight years of age.

    The questions covered many traits, including difficulties with attention, communication, behavioural flexibility, regulation of activity and impulses, as well as motor and language skills.

    The parents and children also provided genetic samples. This allowed us to control for genetic variants shared between mother and child and isolate the behaviour of coffee drinking.

    The study used reports from mothers about their child’s neurodevelopmental traits over more than seven years.
    Ann in the uk/Shutterstock

    What we found

    We were able to look at causality through this method of adjusting for potential confounding factors in the environment (the mother smoking or drinking alcohol, the parents’ education and income).

    The results showed no strong causal link between increased maternal coffee consumption and children’s neurodevelopmental difficulties.

    The difference in findings between our and previous studies may be explained by our work separating the effect of coffee from the effect of other variables, as well as genetic predisposition to neurodevelopmental conditions.

    Our study has limitations. Importantly, we were only able to rule out strong effects of coffee on neurodevelopmental difficulties, and it is possible small effects may exist.

    We only investigated offspring neurodevelopmental traits, and coffee consumption during pregnancy could impact the mother or child in other ways.

    However we have previously shown coffee consumption during pregnancy did not have strong causal effects on birth weight, gestational duration, risk of miscarriage or stillbirth. But other outcomes – such as mental health or a child’s risk for heart disease and stroke later in life – should be investigated.

    Overall, our study supports current clinical guidelines that state low to moderate consumption of coffee during pregnancy is safe for the mother and developing baby.

    For most people, that means sticking below 200mg of caffeine per day – usually equivalent to one espresso or two instant coffees – should be safe. If you have concerns, it’s best to speak to your clinician.

    Gunn-Helen Moen receives funding from the Australian Research Council and the Research Council of Norway.

    Shannon D’Urso does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Does drinking coffee while pregnant cause ADHD? Our study shows there’s no strong link – https://theconversation.com/does-drinking-coffee-while-pregnant-cause-adhd-our-study-shows-theres-no-strong-link-241015

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Film Commission puts itself on a platter for spending cuts

    Source: ACT Party

    ACT’s Arts, Culture and Heritage spokesperson Todd Stephenson is questioning the value of funding the Film Commission after it was revealed that the organisation spent more than $145,000 on a trip for four to the Cannes Film Festival in France.

    “In May, at the height of a cost-of-living crisis and when New Zealanders were reading apocalyptic headlines about austerity in Wellington, four Film Commission staff were enjoying a six-figure junket in Cannes,” says Mr Stephenson.

    “The new Government had repeatedly emphasised the need for spending restraint, but the Film Commission – hardly a core government agency – doubled down on discretionary spending. In a single two-week blowout, four staff spent more than $24,000 on food and drink including fine French dining and dozens of bottles of wine and craft beer. In addition, $21,704 was spent on travel, $24,329 on accommodation, and $74,795 on ‘operational’ costs – including office rental and utilities.

    “Browsing the receipts, obtained by the Taxpayers’ Union, is enough to make you sick.

    “The irony is that the Film Commission spends on boozy dinners to schmooze executives into coming to New Zealand and taking millions of dollars in film subsidies. You’d think the subsidies would be attractive enough on their own.

    “The film industry is lucky to receive subsidies, but when the distributor spends like this it discredits our film subsidy programme and tempts cuts.

    “This is an organisation seemingly incapable of making spending sacrifices that households have been forced to make. Just last year they spent more than $16,000 on parties for their CEOs. And in 2022, another CEO was given a $438,700 severance package – despite only having been in the role for nine months, four of which were on paid leave.

    “The Commission has doubled in size since 2014, but we’re left scratching our heads about what benefits have come from this bloat.

    “ACT is always on the lookout for further savings, and the Film Commission has just presented itself on a silver platter. Would anyone even notice if the Commission’s operational budget was cut in half?”

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-Evening Report: Winston Peters’ $100 billion infrastructure fund is the right idea. Politics-as-usual is the problem

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Timothy Welch, Senior Lecturer in Urban Planning, University of Auckland, Waipapa Taumata Rau

    New Zealand’s infrastructure woes are a constant political pain point. From ageing water systems to congested roads and assets increasingly threatened by climate change, the country faces mammoth upgrading and future-proofing challenges.

    Enter Winston Peters and NZ First with a surprise proposal for a NZ$100 billion “Future Fund” dedicated to infrastructure investment. Sounds promising – but the proposal’s success will hinge on getting the details right and, more importantly, getting the politics out of infrastructure planning.

    Unveiled at NZ First’s annual convention last weekend, the idea bears striking similarities to challenges previously highlighted by urban planning and infrastructure experts.

    The country currently has an estimated infrastructure deficit of over $100 billion, which aligns eerily with the scale of Peters’ proposed fund.

    The Future Fund proposal sounds impressive on paper. Ring-fenced from political meddling and focused on national interests, it’s billed as a silver bullet for infrastructure funding problems.

    Peters claims he’s taken a page from the Singapore and Ireland playbooks – potentially breaking New Zealand’s habit of treating big infrastructure projects like they’re part of a three-year plan.

    Long-term savings

    As always, the devil is in the details – and the Future Fund is light on them. How exactly would this fund be financed? How would projects be selected and prioritised? And, crucially, how would it be insulated from the political interference it claims to avoid?

    The potential benefits are significant. Research suggests that a stable, long-term approach to infrastructure investment and better utilisation of existing assets could unlock substantial savings – potentially up to 40% of total project costs.

    A well-managed $100 billion fund could provide the certainty and consistency needed to achieve these efficiencies.

    The scale of the fund also aligns with the urgent need for a comprehensive infrastructure overhaul. From modernising water systems to expanding road and rail networks, and ensuring resilience against climate change, the required investment is indeed massive.

    Politics is the problem

    Yet the proposal faces significant hurdles, not the least of which is from NZ First’s own coalition partners.

    The National Party’s previous commitments to curb borrowing seem at odds with a fund of this magnitude. Peters argues that debt for wealth creation and infrastructure differs from debt for consumption.

    That’s a valid point, but one that may struggle to gain traction in a political environment focused on reducing overall government debt.

    The proposal also raises questions about how it would interact with existing initiatives, such as the National Investment Agency set up by Infrastructure Minister Chris Bishop. It’s unclear whether these entities would complement each other or create redundancies and inefficiencies.

    Perhaps the most critical question is whether this fund, despite its claimed independence, can rise above the political cycle. We have a long and exhausting history of proposing infrastructure for political gain, where one government’s “vital infrastructure” becomes the next’s “wasteful spending”.

    Time for a 30-year plan

    While the Future Fund could be a big move in the right direction, we must also rethink how we plan (and pay) for infrastructure completely.

    A good start would be a 30-year plan that all political parties can get behind, like the United Kingdom’s National Infrastructure Assessment. This would give us a real long-term vision rather than promises that change with each election cycle.

    We should also look at more innovative ways to fund projects. Value capture, which leverages rising property values near new infrastructure to help finance its development, helped build London’s Crossrail. And Australia is “asset recycling” from old infrastructure into new projects.

    These aren’t just theoretical ideas. They could change how we build what New Zealand needs without the risks of entirely relying on taxpayers.

    Ending the boom-bust cycle

    Efficiency must also be a priority. Time-of-use charges for roads, already implemented in cities such as Stockholm and Singapore and proposed for Auckland, could reduce congestion and wasteful spending on unnecessary road expansions.

    Volumetric charging for water, as seen in the Kāpiti Coast, can significantly reduce water waste without massive new investments.

    New Zealand could also break free from its boom-bust infrastructure cycle by establishing an agency outside the political realm to manage the cash Winston Peters is proposing.

    A truly independent infrastructure body, similar to Infrastructure Australia, could provide the continuity and expertise needed to see projects through political cycles.

    Money isn’t the only issue here. Politics is the real roadblock. Right now, every election cycle, priorities change, projects fly out the window, and the bill for desperately needed infrastructure only gets bigger.

    The Future Fund seems like a step in the right direction. But without also overhauling how we make decisions about infrastructure, it could end up being just another political football.

    Timothy Welch does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Winston Peters’ $100 billion infrastructure fund is the right idea. Politics-as-usual is the problem – https://theconversation.com/winston-peters-100-billion-infrastructure-fund-is-the-right-idea-politics-as-usual-is-the-problem-241346

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Speech to the Institute of Finance Professionals NZ, 2024 Conference

    Source: New Zealand Government

    Kia ora koutou

    Greetings from Wellington. I am sorry I can’t be with you in person today, but I’m delighted that I can talk to you virtually. 

    I’d like to begin by acknowledging your chair Bill Goodwin and members of your board.

    I’d also like to acknowledge the fitness of your conference theme: “Adaptability – highlighting the imperative for both corporate and government investment to be more considered and impactful in light of the financial constraints on governments and the increased costs of capital.”

    That’s quite a mouthful. But, as a finance minister who inherited a structural deficit and a challenging set of circumstances, both domestically and internationally, those are themes dear to my heart. 

    New Zealand, like other countries, has faced significant economic challenges in recent years.  Many businesses and households are doing it tough. High inflation has increased household costs and squeezed business margins.

    However, the two most recent ANZ Business Outlook surveys and the New Zealand Herald’s Mood of the Board room survey suggest you and your colleagues in the business world are increasingly positive about the outlook for the future. 

    The green shoots of business confidence are re-emerging.

    I share your optimism. 

    We’ll get the latest update on inflation tomorrow when Stats NZ releases the September quarter inflation data, but all the indications are that inflation is tracking back down to the Reserve Bank’s target range of 1 to 3 per cent. 

    Certainly, that’s the Reserve Bank’s view. It’s decision last week to drop the Official Cash rate by 50 basis points was a welcome fillip for businesses and households. 

    It followed the 25-basis point drop in August.

    Lower interest rates mean families get to keep more of their money and they increase the opportunities for businesses to invest, innovate and expand.

    How people are impacted by interest rate reductions will depend on the terms of their mortgages – whether they are floating or fixed and, if fixed, for what length of time and at what rates.  

    The good news is that right now roughly half of New Zealand’s mortgage lending is either fixed or floating for a period of six months or fewer. 

    That means the impact of a lower official cash rate will flow through to households much faster than might typically be the case. And the impact will be significant.

    To give one example, a family with a 25-year, $500,000 mortgage could expect to be just over $100 a fortnight better off if its rate dropped from 7 to 6.25 per cent.

    Add that to the tax relief that took effect on 31 July and the FamilyBoost childcare payments that many households are now receiving, and we can confidently say that large numbers of families are now significantly better off than they were a year ago.

    Budget 2024 was another important step in the right direction. It put the Government’s books on a credible path back to fiscal sustainability. 

    The Crown accounts are forecast to return to surplus in 2028 and net core Crown debt is forecast to start trending down as a percentage of gross domestic product the same year. 

    This does not mean that our financial and economic challenges have magically evaporated. It also does not mean that we can pat ourselves on the back and relax the focus that we have re-introduced on fiscal discipline.  

    Fiscal discipline is not a one-off, one-Budget affair. It is an ongoing state of mind. 

    It’s not easily achieved, but it is fundamental to our prospects.

    There is no time in recorded history in which a country has enjoyed a continuous period of economic prosperity without a stable macroeconomic environment. 

    What does that mean in practice? It means low inflation, a balance between government expenditure and revenue and a balance between domestic demand and exports. 

    In other words, governments cannot live beyond their means for sustained periods of time without damaging the future prospects of their citizens.

    Our Government doesn’t just think about constraining future government expenditure. We are equally intent on driving more value from the significant investment the Government already makes across the economy. 

    That means delivering more effective management of the considerable assets we own and making better choices about where and how we use taxpayers’ money.

    For me, the ultimate purpose of strengthening the economy and improving the state of the books is not to change the colour of the ink in those books. It is to improve outcomes for people. 

    As we look ahead, the Government is squarely focused on improving the growth prospects of the New Zealand economy.  

    Growing our economy faster requires us to improve the attractiveness of New Zealand as a launch place for business and exporting, it means attracting and retaining people who choose this as the country where they want to develop and deploy their talents, to start new businesses, to expand existing ones, to invest and drive innovation.   

    It’s a competitive world, and so New Zealand needs to constantly improve our proposition to the world. 

    As we look to the future and consider a globe grappling with challenges to climate, peace and stability, our country’s fundamentals are excellent.  

    In an unstable, hungry world, we are a peaceful, food-producing country blessed with secure borders, strong institutions, a strong sense of community, well-established trade relationships, a reputation for producing innovative and enterprising people, and abundant natural resources.

    Even so, our country has not been making the most of these advantages. 

    We still have much to do to develop our human capital, to make this a more attractive place to invest, to boost our trade with the world, to encourage innovation and harness new technologies, to ensure we have a foundation of world-class infrastructure, and to reduce the regulatory and bureaucratic static that can hamper the deployment of good ideas.

    The Government’s reform agenda is about realising the untapped potential we see in so many dimensions of New Zealand life.    

    We know that to be successful in driving growth we need you and your colleagues in the business community on board.  

    The previous government distrusted private capital and discounted the value of private sector innovation. 

    This Government’s attitude is different. 

    We recognise that you have a critical role to play in innovating, investing and developing markets. Our role as government is to create the framework that encourages the business sector to invest, innovate, employ and take risks.  

    Accordingly, our growth agenda focuses on five key areas. 

    They are not just about the next few years, but about the next few decades. 

    First, we have to start with our people – human capital. 

    We as New Zealanders have a deserved reputation for innovating, rolling up our sleeves and getting on with things. And we still score relatively well in international education tests, but not as well as we used to. 

    That is why Education Minister Erica Stanford is refocusing the education system on the core skills that make the most difference to kids’ prospects – reading, writing and mathematics. 

    She is doing so not just to improve the economic outlook but because lifting educational achievement is the best thing we can do to address social inequality. Education has the power to transform lives.

    Making better use of our human capital also requires us to deliver more effective interventions for those citizens who may be left behind – individuals, families and communities whose lives are disrupted by difficult childhoods, educational under-achievement, unemployment, violence, crime; people whose innate human potential goes unfulfilled.  

    This is where our work in social investment comes in. Our Government wants to better harness the considerable resources New Zealand already invests in well-intended interventions for New Zealanders in need. 

    We want to devolve more power to the non-government organisations and iwi who often know better how to deliver for the needs of their community, and who are eager to act on data and evidence about what works for who.

    Our social investment agency is now up and running, is developing prototype social investment contracts, designing a social investment fund and working across Government to take a more rigorous approach to the social investments we make. 

    Second of the themes in our reform agenda is trade and investment. 

    Congratulations to Trade Minister Todd McClay for last month concluding the negotiations for New Zealand’s fastest-ever free trade agreement with the United Arab Emirates. 

    The negotiations, which will save New Zealand exporters millions of dollars, took just four months. 

    There will be more agreements to come. 

    And we are looking not just at growing our exports, but, equally importantly, at improving capital flows into New Zealand. 

    The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (the OECD) has identified our foreign investment regime as one of the most restrictive in the developed world. 

    As a result, our stock of foreign direct investment is equivalent to about 40 per cent of GDP which compares to the OECD average of about 50 per cent. 

    This low level of investment not only reduces our opportunities to grow, it also slows our access to frontier technologies like artificial intelligence which are changing the way our competitors and trading partners operate. 

    Foreign direct investment is recognised as a key vector for the transfer of cutting-edge technology.  

    We’ve taken initial steps to address this imbalance. Earlier this year Associate Finance Minister David Seymour directed the Overseas Investment Office to administer the overseas investment regime in a way that:

    • minimised compliance costs; 
    • imposed a burden no broader than necessary; and
    • expedited application processes. 

    As a result, every consent application received and processed after his directive came into effect on 6 June has been decided in under half of the statutory timeframe.

    You can expect to hear more from us on this. 

    The Government will make a new round of significant reforms to the Overseas Investment Act next year. We want to put out the welcome mat to investors who want to help grow this country.  

    Third, science and innovation. 

    New Zealand has a proud history of scientific innovation and putting those innovations to good use. 

    In the 1880s the foundations of the New Zealand meat and dairy products industries were laid by the entrepreneurs who took advantage of developments in refrigeration technology to successfully ship frozen meat and dairy products to Britain for the first time. 

    More recently, Sir Peter Jackson, Dame Fran Walsh and Sir Richard Taylor have made Wellington the global centre of film special effects, Sir Peter Beck’s Rocket Lab is leading the world in the development of small, low-cost rockets and the development of a disease resistant strain of golden kiwifruit by scientists at Plant and Food Research has turbo-charged the kiwifruit industry. 

    I could go on – Ernest Rutherford, the Hamilton jetboat, bungy jumping… you get the picture. We need more of this sort of innovation. 

    The Government is doing its part.

    Judith Collins as Science, Innovation and Technology Minister, has announced the outdated, effective ban on gene technology will be scrapped by the end of next year. 

    Doing so will enable researchers and companies to further develop and commercialise their innovative products, improve health outcomes and help New Zealand to adapt to climate change. Ending the ban has the potential to deliver massive economic benefits to New Zealand.

    Judith is overseeing a shake-up of the state science system to better focus it on our economic needs and commercial opportunities.  

    And she is championing efforts to increase the uptake of artificial intelligence by New Zealand businesses as well as efforts to make it easier for businesses and people wanting to interact with government agencies to access government information and support by using AI. 

    Wearing another of his hats, Todd McClay announced earlier this year as agriculture minister that the Government was partnering with the a2 Milk Company, ANZ and ASB to put another $18 million into AgriZero, the joint venture established to boost New Zealand’s efforts to reduce agricultural emissions. 

    The injection took total funding for AgriZero to $183 million over its first four years, half of which is coming from the Crown. This public-private partnership approach is one we want to build on. 

    Fourth, regulation and competition. 

    It sounds dry but removing red tape and making this an easier place in which to get things done really matters, from fixing up the Credit Contracts and Consumer Finance Act (CCCFA), to improving building consent processes to having more pro-competitive prudential regulation.

    One of the most significant regulatory reforms our Government is making is removing the burden that the Resource Management Act has imposed on New Zealand. 

    That law has held back housing development, pushed the dream of home ownership out of reach of many young Kiwis, inhibited development and held back productivity and growth. 

    We are fixing the Act, and we have started with the fast-track regime announced by Infrastructure Minister Chris Bishop which will speed up consenting for 149 housing, infrastructure, renewable energy, mining, aquaculture, farming, and quarrying projects. 

    In the process, the new regime will deliver measurable benefits to regional New Zealand and help to stimulate growth nationally. 

    Fixing the Act does not mean we are throwing away environmental protections. But it does mean we are getting rid of the unnecessary red tape and delays that have held New Zealand back. 

    Improving New Zealand’s competition settings is equally important. In its most recent survey of the New Zealand economy, the OECD highlighted the importance of this work, given the small size of our population and the tendency for sectors to become dominated by a small clutch of players.

    International experience shows that competition is one of the most important drivers of long-term growth and productivity.   

    You’ll have seen that our Government is taking up the recommendations of the recent Commerce Commission inquiry into banking competition.  

    We are concerned that the two-tier oligopoly has meant Kiwis are missing out on the competitive pricing and services they deserve from their banks.

    I have asked the Treasury to engage with Kiwibank’s parent company on options for raising new capital to enable it to be a more disruptive competitor for the big four banks. 

    Potential sources of investment include KiwiSaver funds, New Zealand investments funds and everyday New Zealanders. I will take proposals to Cabinet later this year. 

    We are also alive to challenges in the grocery and electricity sectors. 

    Finally, infrastructure

    New Zealand has an infrastructure deficit that is holding back productivity and that has been worsened by a poor track record of planning, consenting and delivering major projects. 

    We’re working to fix that, by implementing tried and true approaches from more successful economies.

    We hear what business is saying. You want an enduring framework and an enduring pipeline. So do we, and we are applying lessons learned in Australia to our infrastructure reforms. 

    One of these is the importance of bipartisanship. Given the long-term nature of investment in infrastructure it is desirable to have as much buy-in as possible from different political parties. 

    To that end, Infrastructure Minister Chris Bishop has written to the infrastructure spokespeople of each party represented in Parliament inviting them to be briefed by the Infrastructure Commission on the development of a 30-year National Infrastructure Plan.

    Chris is also proposing that Parliament hold an annual special debate on the plan. The debate won’t change the content of the plan because it will be developed independently, but the debate will show where parties agree, where we don’t, and where there is room for compromise in the best interests of New Zealanders. 

    It will come as no surprise to you to hear, that a National-led government sees private capital as key to funding our ambitious work programme and closing New Zealand’s infrastructure gap faster. 

    We are currently in the process of refreshing the policy frameworks that enable private capital to invest in Crown infrastructure. 

    This includes the public private partnership (PPP) framework and unsolicited proposals guidance. We look forward to working further with you on the development of the pipeline.  

    I’ll stop now to leave some time for questions. 

    You can see from the steps we’ve taken and the priorities I’ve outlined that this is a government that is hungry and ambitious for New Zealand. 

    We feel your sense of urgency, we value your expertise, connections and energy, and we want you on board as we seek to tap New Zealand’s untapped potential. 

    You want bold and I want it too. 

    Together, let’s make this the best country in the world in which to do business and raise our families. 

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-Evening Report: Are market giants endangering Australia’s live music scene? Industry veterans and local artists are worried

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Ben Green, Research Fellow, Centre for Social and Cultural Research, Griffith University

    Multinational concert promoter Live Nation Entertainment has come under fire, with an ABC Four Corners investigation saying its unprecedented market power is open to abuse.

    The report follows concerns about the introduction of dynamic pricing – where ticket prices change according to demand – to the Australian concert market. A parliamentary inquiry into the live music sector is also underway.

    Industry luminaries such as Peter Garrett and Michael Chugg told the ABC that Australia’s music scene is under threat, echoing the concerns of frustrated bands and fans. Live Nation issued a statement ahead of the program, calling it inaccurate and unbalanced.

    So what is Live Nation and how is market concentration affecting our music scene?

    The business

    Live music is one of our most popular forms of cultural participation, engaging almost half of Australians over 15. In the decade before COVID, ticket buying and revenue for contemporary music doubled.

    Ticket revenue doubled again in the year 2022–23 to well above pre-pandemic levels. How can such growth be squared against widespread talk of a sector in crisis, with venues closing and festivals cancelled?

    This is because the growth is top-heavy. Overall figures have been boosted by an influx of stadium concerts by international superstars such as Taylor Swift and Ed Sheeran. Rising revenue outpaced attendance growth by almost three to one, with average ticket prices rising 47.4% to A$128.21. Market power is increasingly concentrated in a few corporate hands, notably Live Nation Entertainment.

    ‘We’re in an extinction event right now.’

    What is Live Nation?

    Live Nation began in the United States as a concert promoter. Traditionally, a promoter funds and arranges live events, negotiating with artists, their agents, venues and ticketing services. But Live Nation has integrated many such components into its operations. Now, everything from artist management to venues and merchandise can be done in-house.

    In 2010, the US Department of Justice allowed the merger of Live Nation with major ticketing company Ticketmaster. The resulting entity, Live Nation Entertainment, has since acquired a growing set of interests internationally.

    Live Nation’s acquisitions over the past decade in Australia include:

    Live Nation Entertainment also acquired venues, leasing Melbourne’s Palais Theatre for 30 years from 2017 and Festival Hall. The group purchased Anita’s Theatre in Thirroul in 2022 and opened Brisbane’s Fortitude Music Hall (2020) and Adelaide’s Hindley Street Music Hall (2022) in partnership with local entities.

    Ticketmaster is the authorised ticketing agency for Melbourne’s Marvel Stadium and for Australian tours promoted by Live Nation. These include concerts by Oasis, Green Day, P!nk and Red Hot Chili Peppers.

    Live Nation has also acquired several Australian booking agencies, including Village Sounds, which represents Bernard Fanning, Courtney Barnett and Vance Joy.

    The only competitors are TEG (which owns Ticketek) and AEG-Frontier. Music industry stakeholders are concerned about the oversized influence of these three “corporate giants”.

    Keeping the shareholders happy

    For consumers, a lack of competition can mean higher prices. Dynamic pricing made headlines, but Four Corners also alleged there were a range of “hidden fees” in the price of tickets ordinarily sold by Ticketmaster and Ticketek.

    Artists are at a disadvantage when negotiating with a mass of connected businesses that are often owned by one entity and which sometimes includes their own agent.

    South Australian rock band Bad//Dreems told the ABC they were left with just $9,000 from a tour that grossed $100,000.

    Veteran promoter Michael Chugg complained major artists were being overpaid, skewing the sector to the detriment of local musicians. While Australian promoters, including Chugg and the late Michael Gudinski, have a history of consolidating interests and crowding out competition, they also had skin in the Australian music game. Live Nation is a publicly listed company with duties to its shareholders, including US hedge funds and Saudi royalty.

    Midnight Oil singer and former politician Peter Garrett said this meant there was “no loyalty” to Australian artists. A multinational promoter with a shareholder-driven approach might be more likely to cancel a festival after weak opening sales, instead of weathering short-term losses to preserve the brand and relationships.

    That cancellation might even consolidate demand for the company’s upcoming headline tours. But opportunities are lost for Australian artists, businesses and culture.

    What can be done?

    Federal Arts Minister Tony Burke told Four Corners he has put Live Nation on notice and warned the company not to use its power in an anti-competitive way. But he did not commit to legislative change.

    In the United States, the Department of Justice and dozens of states have sued Live Nation for antitrust, seeking “to break up Live Nation-Ticketmaster’s monopoly and restore competition for the benefit of fans and artists”.

    Australian courts currently have no power to break up monopolies without new legislation. However, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission can investigate and prosecute misuse of market power, as alleged by some in this case.

    Fair trading authorities in the United Kingdom and Europe are examining Ticketmaster’s dynamic pricing in the wake of the Oasis ticket-pricing controversy. However, Burke said surge pricing is something consumers have always dealt with, and “not something we’re looking at, at the moment”.

    Governments could also regulate more transparency in ticket fees, as well as the rights of artists, who sit uncomfortably between employees and small businesses. Their union, MEAA’s Musicians Australia, is currently advocating about these matters.

    Those passionate about Australia’s live music scene fear that if the sector isn’t better regulated, it’ll soon be too late to save it.

    Ben Green receives research funding from the Australian Research Council and the Australasian Performing Right Association.

    Sam Whiting receives funding from RMIT University and the Winston Churchill Trust.

    ref. Are market giants endangering Australia’s live music scene? Industry veterans and local artists are worried – https://theconversation.com/are-market-giants-endangering-australias-live-music-scene-industry-veterans-and-local-artists-are-worried-241244

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-Evening Report: Speakers, vacuums, doorbells and fridges – the government plans to make your ‘smart things’ more secure

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Abu Barkat ullah, Associate Professor of Cyber Security, University of Canberra

    gorodenkoff/Shutterstock

    The Australian government has introduced its first-ever standalone cyber security act. Along with two other cyber security bills, it’s currently being reviewed by a parliamentary committee.

    Among the act’s many provisions are mandatory “minimum cyber security standards for smart devices”.

    This marks a crucial step in defending the digital lives of Australians. So what devices would it apply to? And what can you do right now to protect your smart devices from cyber criminals?

    Smart devices are everywhere

    The new legislation aims to cover a wide range of smart devices – products that can connect to the internet in some way.

    This includes “internet-connectable” products – think smartphones, laptops, tablets, smart TVs and gaming consoles. It also includes indirect “network-connectable” products, which can send and receive data. This means things like smart home devices and appliances, wearables (smart watches, fitness trackers), smart vacuums and many more.

    Simple electronic devices that don’t connect to the internet or can’t store or process sensitive data are not included.

    According to one study, 7.6 million Australian households – more than 70% – had at least one smart home device by the end of 2023, and 3 million of those households had more than five.

    To work as well as they do, smart devices typically collect, store and share data. This can include sensitive personal information, health data and geo-location data, making them attractive targets for cyber criminals.

    A notorious example is the Mirai botnet in 2016, when cyber criminals infected more than 600,000 devices such as cameras, home routers, and video players globally to use them in massively disruptive network attacks, known as a distributed denial-of-service (DDoS).

    Even implantable medical devices, such as pacemakers and insulin pumps, can have security flaws that could be exploited.

    Just last week, the ABC reported that one of the world’s largest home robotics companies has failed to address security issues in its robot vacuums despite warnings from the previous year.

    The consequences of such vulnerabilities can be even more dangerous when smart devices are part of critical infrastructure. As these devices become more interconnected, a breach in one can compromise entire networks, amplifying the security risks.

    What will be the ‘minimum’ security standards?

    The new cyber security act provides for “mandatory security standards” for smart devices. It establishes the legal framework for enforcing these standards, but doesn’t explicitly outline the technical details smart devices must meet. In the past the Department of Home Affairs has suggested that Australia consider adopting an international security standard, such as ETSI EN 303 645.

    The bill’s focus is on securing connected devices to protect users from internet-based threats, vulnerabilities and risks.

    In practice, this means manufacturers will have to ensure their products meet these minimum security standards and provide a statement of compliance. And suppliers will have to include statements of compliance with the product, and will be forbidden from selling non-compliant products.

    All this will be enforced through the Secretary of Home Affairs, who can issue compliance, stop, or recall notices for violations of these rules.

    You can do your bit to stay safe

    The proposed cyber security act is a significant step forward in protecting Australians from the growing threat of cyber attacks on smart devices.

    But this may only apply to new devices or ones still receiving updates from manufacturers. Exact details on how the legislation will apply to existing devices will be determined by the government agency responsible for its implementation.

    “Legacy” devices with outdated software – older products that are no longer supported and don’t receive the latest security patches – are particularly vulnerable to cyber attacks.

    While the government works on introducing the new cyber security laws, there are several things you can do to protect your smart devices:

    • set up a strong wifi password to prevent unauthorised access to your home network
    • create a dedicated, more secure wifi network for smart home devices
    • always install security patches and updates promptly
    • create unique and complex passwords for each account
    • where possible, use two-factor authentication to add an extra layer of security
    • disable unnecessary features or permissions, and be mindful of the information you share with apps and devices
    • make sure you understand how your data is collected and used by apps and devices.

    By mandating minimum cyber security standards and providing for effective enforcement mechanisms, Australia’s new cyber security act will help keep consumer devices safer.

    However, it’s important to note that as technology continues to evolve rapidly, the cyber crime ecosystem is also expanding. The global cost of cyber crime is projected to reach US$9.5 trillion in 2024.

    Given the dynamic nature of cyber threats, relying solely on standards may not be sufficient to address all potential risks. New vulnerabilities are discovered regularly, and it’s essential for every one of us to remain vigilant and practice good cyber hygiene by following the tips above.

    Abu Barkat ullah does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Speakers, vacuums, doorbells and fridges – the government plans to make your ‘smart things’ more secure – https://theconversation.com/speakers-vacuums-doorbells-and-fridges-the-government-plans-to-make-your-smart-things-more-secure-241057

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI Economics: Media release: Opposition’s pledge to include gas in Capacity Investment Scheme welcomed – Australian Energy Producers

    Source: Australian Petroleum Production & Exploration Association

    Headline: Media release: Opposition’s pledge to include gas in Capacity Investment Scheme welcomed – Australian Energy Producers

    Opposition’s pledge to include gas in Capacity Investment Scheme welcomed 

    Australian Energy Producers welcomes the Federal Opposition’s plan to include gas in the Capacity Investment Scheme (CIS) to help secure urgently needed investment in gas power generation capacity. 

    Australian Energy Producers Chief Executive Samantha McCulloch said the announcement sent a strong signal about the critical, long-term role of gas in Australia’s energy mix and would redress a policy failure of omitting gas from the scheme.  

    “The energy market operator recently highlighted that the National Electricity Market will need an additional 13 GW of new gas power generation to be built by 2050 as part of the least-cost transition, underscoring the increasingly important role of gas for Australia’s energy security,” she said. 

    “Australia urgently needs investment in new gas supply and infrastructure, and the CIS is an important lever to support this necessary investment.” 

    “Amid an increasingly difficult regulatory and investment environment in Australia, the Coalition has recognised the critical role of gas and the need for more supply to ensure reliable and affordable energy for households and businesses.” 

    Today’s announcement complements Coalition commitments to address the regulatory barriers to new gas supply, unlock key gas basins, and to reinstate annual acreage releases.  

    “Australia needs energy policies that provide certainty around project approvals and regulatory stability to restore investor confidence,” she said. 

    “The deliberate exclusion of gas from the current CIS was a mistake that needs correcting to incentivise the significant investment needed to ensure Australians have reliable and affordable energy. 

    “This is not a measure that needs to wait until the next federal election – it is a conversation that state and federal energy ministers should be having today.” 

     

    Media Contact: Brad Thompson on 0401 839 227 

    MIL OSI Economics