Category: Business

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Farmers welcome Taranaki adverse event declaration

    Source: Federated Farmers

    Federated Farmers is pleased the Government has recognised the desperate situation of some Taranaki farmers with the declaration of a medium-scale adverse event across the province.
    “The lack of any decent rain for several months, compounding a year and a half of much lower than usual rainfall, is causing huge stress for farmers,” Federated Farmers Taranaki president Leedom Gibbs says.
    “That’s especially in the Manaia, Hāwera and Kakaramea hotspots.
    “They’ve never seen it so extremely dry, so early.”
    Water tables are very low, meaning wells and bores have dried up and farmers have had to truck in water as well as feed.
    “On top of bank interest rates and other costs, this is just another big layer of worry for those farmers.”
    Gibbs says most New Zealanders are isolated from drought impacts but for farmers the situation is “desperate and very real.
    “Getting enough water and feed for the animals they feel a huge duty of care for, weighs on their mind.
    “Finances are under pressure too, and whether or not you’re in business, you can understand the stress that adds.”
    The adverse event declaration means extra funding for Rural Support’s counselling and advisory services, with flexibility around tax for affected farmers, and the potential for Rural Assistance Payments from the Ministry of Social Development.
    “As much as those things, it’s also the official recognition of the seriousness of what’s happening to them,” Gibbs says.
    She chairs the Rural Coordinating Group (RCG) that has been running a series of farmer support events in the district.
    “Where it’s needed, dairy herds are being dried off early and all stock that’s not needed for next year has already gone to the works.
    “Drought impacts can be like a slow-moving landslide, and the earlier you respond to it as a farmer and get plans in place, the better off you are,” Gibbs says.
    “For any farmer that might still need a prompt to start necessary actions, the adverse event declaration will help.” 

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-Evening Report: Dutton hints he’ll sack 36,000 public servants. Voters deserve to know what services will be affected

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By John Hawkins, Senior Lecturer, Canberra School of Politics, Economics and Society, University of Canberra

    Peter Dutton and his Coalition colleagues have dithered for several weeks on their plans for the Commonwealth public sector.

    While being upfront that public service jobs would be targeted, they’ve made numerous contradictory statements about the number of public servants who would be sacked if the Coalition wins the coming election.

    But Peter Dutton’s most recent comments confirm that he clearly wants to make significant cuts.

    And it’s hard to see how the sackings wouldn’t erode important front line services that many Australians depend on for help and support.

    36,000 jobs on the line

    This week the opposition leader declared the Coalition would achieve A$24 billion in savings by reducing the size of the public service.

    He was unequivocal. The money would be clawed back over four years and would more than cover the Coalition’s promised $9 billion injection into Medicare.

    Dutton explicitly tied the $24 billion in savings to the 36,000 Commonwealth public servants who have been hired since the last election

    Under the Labor Party, there are 36,000 additional public servants, that’s at a cost of $6 billion a year, or $24 billion over the forward estimates. This program totals $9 billion over that period. So, we’ve well and truly identified the savings.

    While still not nominating a precise number of job cuts, it’s Peter Dutton’s clearest statement of intent to date. By “truly” identifying the savings, 36,000 jobs are on the line. And it accords with Dutton’s earlier comments that the extra workers are not providing value for money for Australian taxpayers.

    (They have) not improved the lives of Australians one iota

    While this sounds like he wants to dismiss them all, senior colleagues are more circumspect.

    According to Nationals leader David Littleproud, the number of job cuts has not yet been decided. Shadow Public Service Minister Jane Hume further muddied the waters by referring to the cuts being by attrition, and excluding frontline services.

    Frontline services

    The public service head count has grown to 185,343, as of June 2024. So cutting 36,000 staff, or even a large proportion of that number, would be a very significant reduction.

    The agencies that added the most public servants between June 2023 and June 2024 were the National Disability Insurance Agency (up 2,193), Defence (up 1,425), Health and Aged Care (up 1,173) and Services Australia (up 1,149).

    Many of these extra staff would be providing invaluable front line services to clients and customer who are accessing essential support.

    And some of the new public servants replaced more expensive outsourced workers. Finance Minister Katy Gallagher has claimed the Albanese government has saved $4 billion of taxpayers’ money by reducing spending on consultants and contractors.

    Rather than the alleged explosion in the size of the bureaucracy, the growth in public service numbers has closely matched the increase in the population. Last year, they accounted for 1.36% of all employed persons, up by only a minuscule degree on the 1.35% in 2016.

    Canberra bashing

    According to Dutton, the 36,000 additional public servants hired under Labor all work in Canberra. It was not a slip of the tongue. The claim is also in the Liberal Party’s pre-election pamphlet.

    But only 37% of the public service workforce is located in the national capital. Half are based in state capitals. A full quarter of those involved in service delivery work in regional Australia.

    The Liberals clearly think they have nothing to lose among Canberra voters, given they have no members or senators from the Australian Capital Territory.

    The coming election will no doubt tell us if Canberra bashing still resonates with voters elsewhere in the country. Dutton has clearly made the political judgement that it does.

    Another night of the long knives?

    A change of government often precipitates a clean out at the top of the public service.

    When the Howard government was elected in 1996, no fewer than six departmental secretaries were sacked on the infamous night of the long knives. Then prime minister Tony Abbott dismissed four departmental chiefs in one fell swoop after taking office in 2013. He didn’t even consult his treasurer before dumping the head of Treasury.

    This pattern of culling senior public servants represents a chilling risk to good policy development. Departmental secretaries concerned about losing their jobs may be reluctant to give the “frank and fearless advice” their positions demand.




    Read more:
    After robodebt, here’s how Australia can have a truly ‘frank and fearless’ public service again


    Spending cuts after the election

    Voters are entitled to know what the Coalition has planned for the public service before they cast their ballots.

    The lack of detail on job losses is matched by a reluctance to outline spending cuts elsewhere. Dutton has ruled out an Abbott-style audit commission. He is prepared to cut “wasteful” spending, but won’t say if it may be necessary to also chop some worthwhile outlays to dampen inflationary pressures.

    Dutton is adamant that any spending cuts by a government he leads will be determined after the election, not announced before it. This does nothing for democratic accountability. It does not give the electorate the chance to cast their votes on the basis of an alternative vision from the alternative government.

    All Australians, not just public servants, deserve to know before polling day just how deep Dutton and the Coalition are really planning to cut.

    John Hawkins is a former public servant and lives in Canberra.

    ref. Dutton hints he’ll sack 36,000 public servants. Voters deserve to know what services will be affected – https://theconversation.com/dutton-hints-hell-sack-36-000-public-servants-voters-deserve-to-know-what-services-will-be-affected-250797

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Public invited to have say on water sector fit for the future

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Press release

    Public invited to have say on water sector fit for the future

    Independent Water Commission explores fresh ideas on water sector reforms, both evolutionary and revolutionary.

    The public, environment groups, investors and others are invited to share their views from today (27 February) on future changes to the water sector.

    How customer bills are set, environmental regulation, the financial resilience of water companies and how to attract long-term investment in the sector are among the areas where the Commission is seeking views. 

    The wide-ranging Call for Evidence is open for views from all interested parties until 23 April. The Independent Water Commission will make its final recommendations to both UK and Welsh Governments this summer.

    Sir Jon Cunliffe, Chair of the Independent Water Commission and Former Deputy Governor of the Bank of England, will give a speech in Manchester today where he will share his reflections since taking up the role.

    Commenting ahead of the event, Sir Jon said: 

    The Commission’s initial work has highlighted a range of serious and often interlocking concerns. Ambitious changes will be needed to address these concerns and rebuild the trust in the system that has broken down on all sides – customers, environmental groups, investors and companies.

    The Call for Evidence will play a key role in shaping the Commission’s thinking going forward and I welcome input from all those who want to contribute to our work.

    There are six key areas where the Commission is seeking views. These are: 

    1. The strategic management of water. This seeks views on how to manage the many competing pressures and demands on the water system, and how strategic direction and management can be set at both national and regional levels. 

    2. The overarching regulatory system. This covers the volume and complexity of legislation in the water sector, and the overall functions and responsibilities of the four regulators (Ofwat, Environment Agency, Drinking Water Inspectorate, Natural Resources Wales).

    3. Economic regulation. This seeks views on the five-yearly Price Review process and the weight placed upon industry-wide benchmarking. It also covers customer protections, financial resilience and investor returns. This includes how to attract the necessary finance for future investment, with a fair balance between risk and reward.

    4. Environmental and drinking water regulation. This covers how regulation can better protect the environment, public health and the country’s finite water resources. It seeks views on how water companies are held to account for non-compliance.

    5. Water company ownership models. This includes the impact of public listing versus private ownership and how to ensure financial resilience.

    6. Asset health and supply chains. This seeks views on improving the resilience of water company infrastructure – its pipes, water treatment plants, reservoirs and pumping stations. It also covers the capacity and robustness of water industry supply chains.

    Sir Jon continued:

    The problems we see today have not emerged overnight. Nor, do I believe, are they the inevitable consequence of a privatised regulated company model.

    Rather, they have developed over time and due to factors including poor decisions and poor performance by companies, regulatory gaps, policy instability and a history of ad-hoc changes that have left an increasingly complex system that is no longer working well for anyone. Our task is to stand back from the current system and explore, with an open mind, potential changes.

    We should not forget that the prize here is significant – cleaner waters, growth and a stable, well-funded sector that can deliver essential, world-class services for future generations.

    Sir Jon is speaking today (27 February) at Mayfield Depot in Manchester, with environmental groups, investors, regulators, industry leaders and government ministers among those present.

    The site is in the city’s first new park in over 100 years and includes the River Medlock, which was restored to create new habitats for wildlife such as kingfishers and brown trout. It demonstrates integrated water management principles – local groups working together to improve water management.

    The Independent Water Commission was announced by the UK and Welsh governments in October 2024. It is operating independently of UK and Welsh Ministers.

    It is supported by an advisory panel, with leading voices from areas including the environment, public health and investment.

    All responses to the Call for Evidence must be received by midnight on Wednesday 23 April 2025.

    Updates to this page

    Published 27 February 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Ministers approve long awaited A47 road scheme to support over 40,000 homes and 30,000 new jobs

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Press release

    Ministers approve long awaited A47 road scheme to support over 40,000 homes and 30,000 new jobs

    Road scheme will speed up journeys and revive economic growth across Norwich.

    • A47 road scheme which was held up in the courts given the green light for construction as the government delivers another vital road project
    • long-awaited A47/A11 Thickthorn junction scheme will speed up journey times, support 44,000 new homes in the area and creating 33,000 new jobs as part of the wider city deal
    • over £200 million set aside for the scheme as part of the government’s commitment to renew national infrastructure and drive growth as part of the Plan for Change

    Norwich residents are set to see faster journeys and thousands of new homes and jobs in the region as ministers approve the long delayed A47/A11 Thickthorn Junction scheme, the government has announced today (27 February 2025).

    Backed by over £200 million, this road development will significantly speed up journey times, reduce pressure on the junction and save commuters, businesses and freight hundreds of hours off journeys each week.

    On the eastbound A11 to A47, drivers will save 3 to 4 minutes off journeys in the morning and afternoon travel peaks. Along the A11, the route will also shave off 2 to 3 minutes in the morning and afternoon peaks.

    The scheme is supporting the Greater Norwich City Deal, attracting more businesses to operate in Norwich and is expected to create over 44,000 homes, 33,000 new jobs and 360 additional hectares of new commercial land by 2038. 

    Today’s announcement follows the Prime Minister’s commitment to ‘clear the path to get Britain building’ by overhauling rules that allow vital infrastructure projects including the A47 to be challenged in courts 3 times – causing years of delays and costing taxpayers hundreds of millions of pounds.

    The A47 is an example of an infrastructure project which has been delayed by over a year due to expensive legal challenges which have been dismissed by the courts as having ‘no logical basis’ – preventing areas like Norwich from unlocking their full potential.

    Ministers have now finally given the go ahead to the project as part of a wider drive to unblock vital transport infrastructure development. Since entering office, the government has approved the A130 Fairglen Interchange, the A647 scheme in Leeds and is supporting expansion of Heathrow Airport.

    This is an important milestone for this pro-growth and pro-infrastructure government, cutting the red tape which has for too long held up vital schemes and cost the taxpayer millions as part of the Plan for Change.

    To mark this significant milestone for drivers in Norwich, the Future of Roads Minister, Lilian Greenwood, has visited the A47 to mark the approval of the scheme and understand its impact on the local economy.

    The Future of Roads Minister, Lilian Greenwood, said:

    This scheme is finally getting to go-ahead it deserves, after years of expensive legal blocks, as we are now able to unlock this vital scheme that Norwich has waited long for. We are determined to get Britain building again as this scheme is set to not only improve journeys but create thousands of new homes and jobs. 

    To help deliver our Plan for Change, we’re investing in more vital road schemes such as this over £200 million funding for Norwich, and the recently announced £90 million for other schemes across England, to renew our national infrastructure, speed up journeys and revive economic growth.

    The upgraded junction will also improve links between Norwich and Peterborough, expanding job opportunities and better connecting communities, and is also a key route to Norwich University Hospital.

    The new design will also improve safety, with rerouted traffic and safer pedestrian and cycle routes, projected to save as many as 26 fatal or serious injury collisions over the next 60 years.

    The plans include the construction of 2 new free-flowing slip roads that will connect the A47 with the A11, re-routing traffic away from the junction and flowing it under new underpasses.

    The government is providing over £200 million for the scheme which is expected to generate millions more for the local economy of Norfolk. It is part of the government’s Plan for Change to renew infrastructure and grow the economy.

    With the aim to accelerate the delivery of infrastructure across the UK, the government is focused on improving the UK’s road network to increase economic growth.

    As well as faster journeys, drivers in Norfolk are also set to benefit from improved road surfaces, thanks to a recently announced £56 million uplift in highway maintenance funding for Norfolk. This is part of the government’s record £1.6 billion investment to fill the equivalent of 7 million potholes and repair roads across England.

    Nicola Bell, Executive Director of Major Projects at National Highways, said:

    Getting the green light to improve the junction at Thickthorn is great news for local people and those who regularly work or travel in and around Norwich.

    This will help support economic growth in the area, significantly reduce congestion, improve journey times, and make the road safer.

    Councillor Graham Plant, Cabinet member for Highways Infrastructure and Transport, Norfolk County Council, said:

    We’re thrilled that this long-anticipated project has received approval. Thickthorn Junction has been a persistent bottleneck and we’ve been pushing for these improvements for a number of years.

    This scheme will unlock significant economic growth, helping to supercharge the vital connection between the A11 and the nationally significant businesses that have found a home in Norfolk. Norfolk residents will benefit from safer and more reliable journeys as they make their way to Norwich and beyond.

    Nova Fairbank, Chief Executive, Norfolk Chambers of Commerce, said:

    The Norfolk business community has long campaigned for improvements to the whole of the A47, our main route from east to west and a key part of this route is the Thickthorn Junction, which connects the A11 to the A47. As a result, they welcome the allocation of much needed funding for the Thickthorn Junction scheme. Businesses are looking forward to seeing safety improvements and the reduction of congestion and journey times.

    The ability to deliver further housing, jobs and new commercial opportunities, as a result of this junction upgrade, will make a significant difference. This infrastructure investment will give more businesses confidence to invest in their own growth and thus, help unlock wider economic growth for our region.

    Roads media enquiries

    Media enquiries 0300 7777 878

    Switchboard 0300 330 3000

    Updates to this page

    Published 27 February 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Scottish businesses sell to the world with £42 million lift

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Press release

    Scottish businesses sell to the world with £42 million lift

    £42 million of export finance deals brokered with Scottish businesses over the last six months.

    • £42 million of export finance deals brokered with Scottish businesses since July
    • Boosting Scottish exports plays a vital role in growing the economy, a key part of the Plan for Change
    • Companies from a range of sectors including food and drink and offshore wind are benefitting from credit guarantees and insurance

    Businesses behind Scotland’s most emblematic exports have been able to grow thanks to £42 million in UK Export Finance (UKEF) deals brokered so far since the summer.

    Enabling companies such as Ferguson Whisky and manufacturer of fire and rescue vehicles Emergency One, which the government of Iraq has contracted to replace some of its fleet of fire engines, to expand to markets abroad helps to grow the economy and create jobs, delivering on the Plan for Change. 

    The latest Scottish business to benefit from support is Aberdeen-based First Tech – one of many offshore services firms in Scotland driving the energy transition and making the country a world-renowned centre of engineering skills. Scotland’s marine economy generated around £4.9 billion in 2022.

    UKEF is renewing a £12 million support package delivered with Virgin Money for First Tech subsidiary First Subsea, allowing it to continue its growth into the offshore wind market and provide UK-made products like cable protections systems, bend restrictor products or heavy lift connectors, across the globe.

    Minister Douglas Alexander will join UKEF representatives today at the ‘Made in Scotland’ roadshow, where he will encourage Scottish businesses to take advantage of the opportunities to sell abroad and hear first-hand about the support UKEF has provided.

    Minister for Trade Policy Douglas Alexander said:

    “Growing the economy is a key part of this UK Government’s Plan for Change, and we recognise the importance of boosting Scottish exports in achieving this.

    “We’re working hard to ensure that Scottish businesses have the support they need to sell to the world and grow, and the help that UK Export Finance provides is a crucial part of this.”

    Martin Suttie, First Tech Ltd Chairman said:

    “First Tech is very proud to be at the forefront of the energy transition story with our continued expertise in oil and gas being a launchpad to make meaningful developments in both the fixed and floating offshore wind market through First Subsea and also First Marine Solutions. 

    “Floating wind technology enables almost every country in the world to integrate floating wind renewable energy into their energy mix.  It is therefore vitally important that the industry continues to develop and prove large scale commercial developments if we are going to genuinely change the energy mix around the globe. The First Tech Group is excited to play an important part in making this transition happen.”

    UKEF is the UK government’s export credit agency, providing credit guarantees and insurance helping smaller businesses to overcome financial barriers to exporting.  Export credit is an integral part of the government trade support being promoted at the first ‘Made in Scotland, Sold to the World’ trade fair of 2025. 

    In 2021, Scotland’s exports were worth £50.1 billion, of which the majority – £33.5 billion – were goods.

    UKEF’s specialised trade finance offer sits alongside other sources of support from public organisations like the Export Support Service, UK Export Academy and British Business Bank, which can offer more general access to finance.

    Notes to editors:

    • UKEF is a UK government ministerial department and the nation’s export credit agency (ECA). UKEF helps exporters access working capital and manage the risk of not getting paid by offering a government guarantee. It supports companies of all sizes and multiple sectors across the UK.

    • UKEF works alongside other sources of public financing and business support in Scotland, including DBT Scotland, Scottish Enterprise, UK Infrastructure Bank, British Business Bank and Scottish National Investment Bank.

    • In 2024, Ferguson Whisky Limited secured a new £450,000 funding package from Virgin Money thanks to UKEF support. Ferguson can support investments in whisky and also organises distillery tours and other events.

    • Based in Cumnock, Emergency One is the UK’s leading manufacturer of fire and rescue vehicles. A UKEF loan has allowed the Iraqi government to purchase 31 Emergency One vehicles and deliver one of its biggest-ever investments into its emergency services. The vehicles will help to tackle the frequent fires which break out in Iraq, especially in the summer.

    Updates to this page

    Published 27 February 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI Canada: Prime Minister Justin Trudeau speaks with premiers to discuss the Canada-U.S. relationship and Canada’s fight against fentanyl

    Source: Government of Canada – Prime Minister

    Today, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau met virtually with Canada’s premiers to discuss Canada-U.S. relations and Canada’s fight against fentanyl. The Prime Minister was joined by the Minister of Finance and Intergovernmental Affairs, Dominic LeBlanc, the Minister of Public Safety, David J. McGuinty, and Canada’s Fentanyl Czar, Kevin Brosseau. The Prime Minister and the premiers welcomed the new Premier of Prince Edward Island, Rob Lantz, to the First Ministers’ table and thanked the Premier of Newfoundland and Labrador, Andrew Furey, for his contributions.

    Minister McGuinty provided an update on Canada’s fight against fentanyl, noting progress on the ongoing implementation of Canada’s Border Plan as well as his and Mr. Brosseau’s recent conversations with counterparts in the U.S. He highlighted concrete actions Canada has taken to detect, disrupt, and dismantle the fentanyl trade and protect our communities, including by adding new and expanded detection and interdiction capacity at border entries. Canada’s Border Plan also includes working with provinces, territories, and local law enforcement to create three regional hubs that bring federal, provincial, and local law enforcement officers together to support and focus enforcement capacity and intercept organized crime and illegal drugs faster. The Prime Minister reaffirmed that the federal government will strengthen its efforts to eradicate this deadly substance from our communities.

    First Ministers discussed the ongoing threat of unjustified U.S. tariffs, and they expressed their unanimous opposition to any tariffs on Canadian goods, including aluminum and steel. The Prime Minister stated that he remains hopeful that tariffs will not be imposed, but he reiterated that Canada stands ready to respond if needed.

    The Prime Minister thanked the premiers for their ongoing engagement and contributions as part of a Team Canada approach. Federal, provincial, and territorial leaders noted that tariff-free trade between Canada and the U.S. has lowered prices, created jobs, generated economic growth, and increased the standard of living for Canadians and Americans alike. The Prime Minister and the premiers reiterated their commitment to preventing the U.S. from imposing any tariffs on Canadian goods and to removing barriers to internal trade and labour mobility within Canada.

    The Prime Minister and the premiers agreed to remain united and in close contact as they confront threats to Canadian jobs and prosperity.

    Associated Links

    MIL OSI Canada News

  • MIL-OSI Security: Apartment Renter for High-End Brothel Network Pleads Guilty

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    BOSTON – A Torrance, Calif. man pleaded guilty today in federal court in Boston to his involvement in operating sophisticated high-end brothels in greater Boston and eastern Virginia and to his involvement in fraudulently obtaining over $580,000 in COVID-19 relief funds.

    James Lee, 70, pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to persuade, induce, entice, and coerce one or more individuals to travel in interstate or foreign commerce to engage in prostitution; one count of money laundering conspiracy; and one count of wire fraud. U.S. District Court Judge Julia E. Kobick scheduled sentencing for April 29, 2025. James Lee was arrested and charged in November 2023 with co-defendants Han Lee, 42, of Cambridge, Mass. and Junmyung Lee, 31, of Dedham, Mass. The defendants were subsequently indicted by a federal grand jury in February 2024.

    From at least January 2022 through and including November 2023, James Lee knowingly conspired with Han Lee and Junmyung Lee to operate an interstate prostitution network with multiple brothels in greater Boston and eastern Virginia designed to entice women to travel interstate to engage in prostitution. James Lee and his co-conspirators also knowingly conspired with one another, and others, to launder the proceeds of the prostitution network by concealing that the money was derived from the prostitution conspiracy.

    James Lee rented several high-end apartments in Boston and Eastern Virginia that were used as brothel locations. James Lee was the sole and legal tenant of at least six locations used by this prostitution network. In addition to using his own name to lease the apartments, James Lee would use fraudulent identities and, at times, stolen identities of actual people. James Lee was regularly compensated by his co-conspirators for both leasing apartments and for his travel to and from the brothel locations. Han Lee paid James Lee approximately $1,000 per month per active lease as a commission. James Lee served as a liaison between the females working in the units and the property managers by fielding calls and coordinating any issues that arose relating to maintenance and inspections.

    James Lee and his co-conspirators concealed the proceeds of the prostitution network by depositing hundreds of thousands of dollars of cash proceeds into their personal bank accounts and peer-to-peer transfers. Additionally, the defendants regularly used hundreds of thousands of dollars of the cash proceeds from the prostitution business to purchase money orders (in values under an amount that would trigger reporting and identification requirements) to conceal the source of the funds. These money orders were then used to pay for rent and utilities at brothel locations in Massachusetts and Virginia.

    Beginning in our around March 2020 through September 2021, James Lee submitted fraudulent information in an effort to obtain loans through CARES Act and the Small Business Administration’s programs like the Economic Injury Disaster Loan (“EIDL”) program and the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP). James Lee used personal identifying information of a third-party to submit false loan applications and open bank accounts used to accept COVID-19 relief funds. In addition James Lee fraudulently applied for PPP Loans and EIDL funds using the names of businesses that did not exist or served as shell companies in furtherance of the scheme. In support of the loan applications, James Lee submitted fraudulent tax documents in the name of the third party and a fraudulent lease between himself and his fraudulent identity. As a result of the scheme, James Lee obtained at least $580,000 in fraudulent EIDL funds and PPP loans.

    Han Lee pleaded guilty in September 2024 and is scheduled to be sentenced on March 19, 2025. In October 2024, Junmyung Lee pleaded guilty and is scheduled to be sentenced on April 18, 2025.

    Members of the public who have questions, concerns or information regarding this case should contact USAMA.VictimAssistance@usdoj.gov.

    The charge of conspiracy to persuade, induce, entice, and coerce one or more individuals to travel in interstate or foreign commerce to engage in prostitution provides for a sentence of up to five years in prison, three years of supervised release and a fine of up to $250,000. The charge of money laundering conspiracy provides for a sentence of up to 20 years in prison, three years of supervised release and a $500,000 fine or twice the value of funds laundered, whatever is greater. The charge of wire fraud provides for a sentence of up to 20 years in prison, three years of supervised release and a fine of up to $250,000 or twice the loss from the scheme. Sentences are imposed by a federal district court judge based upon the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and statutes which govern the determination of a sentence in a criminal case.

    United States Attorney Leah B. Foley; Michael J. Krol, Special Agent in Charge of Homeland Security Investigations in New England; and Cambridge Police Commissioner Christine Elow made the announcement today. Valuable assistance was provided by the Central District of California; Eastern District of Virginia; U.S. Postal Service; and Watertown Police Department. Assistant U.S. Attorney Lindsey E. Weinstein of the Criminal Division and Assistant U.S. Attorney Raquelle Kaye, of the Asset Recovery Unit are prosecuting the case.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: Two Men Sentenced to Life in Federal Prison for Double Murder and Attempted Murder of a Federal Officer on the Colville Reservation

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    Spokane, Washington – Acting United States Attorney Richard R. Barker announced that on February 26, 2025, Zachary L. Holt, age 24, and Dezmonique D. Tenzsley (a/k/a “Privilege”), age 36, were sentenced on seventeen counts including Felony Murder in Indian Country, Attempted Murder of a Federal Officer, Assault of a Federal Officer, Attempted Robbery in Indian Country, Robbery Affecting Commerce, as well as several firearm offenses. Holt also was sentenced for First-Degree Murder in Indian Country and Murder Resulting from Discharging a Firearm During a Crime of Violence. Holt and Tenzsley were convicted of these crimes on November 25, 2024, following a jury trial. United States District Judge Thomas O. Rice sentenced both men to life in prison, which was the mandatory sentence for Holt and Tenzsley’s crimes.

    “The U.S. Attorney’s Office and numerous federal agencies came together to secure some measure of justice on behalf of the victims in this case,” stated Acting United States Attorney Barker, who served as a lead counsel on the case from the start. “This was a complicated investigation and trial, involving nearly sixty witnesses.  The U.S. Attorneys Office would not have been able to present this case without the sacrifices of our incredible law enforcement team.” 

    According to court documents and information disclosed at trial and sentencing, Holt and Tenzsley went on a six-week crime spree that began in September 2022 in Northern Idaho and continued until the Defendants’ arrests in Eastern Washington on October 21, 2022. Over these six weeks, Defendants Holt and Tenzsley committed home invasions as well as a robbery in Northern Idaho, and then took their firearms and much of the stolen property into Eastern Washington, where they shot and killed Gale and Jeremy Neal at roughly 4:21 p.m. on October 20, 2022, in Keller, Washington. Gale and Jeremy Neal were shot twice inside their trailer during a failed robbery. Eyewitnesses described three armed men wearing masks, who arrived at the trailer in a red sedan. Surveillance video presented at trial showed the red sedan arrive at about 4:19 p.m. and depart two minutes and ten seconds later, at 4:21 p.m., just moments after the murder.

    Approximately 30 minutes before the murders, Holt and Tenzsley were driving on a dirt road in the Keller area. Holt, who was speeding, swerved to miss a school bus, causing Holt’s vehicle to roll over into a ditch. Minutes later, Holt’s brother, Curry Pinkham, pulled up in the red sedan to give both Holt and Tenzsley a ride.  Just before getting into the car, Holt and Tenzsley moved several firearms – including the murder weapon – and thousands of rounds of ammunition out of the crashed car and into the red sedan – a 2007 Toyota Camry.

    Testimony at trial established that Holt was upset about wrecking his car and demanded that Pinkham take them to a location where they could get more drugs and find someone to rob. Pinkham agreed to drive Holt to the home of a known drug dealer in the Keller area.

    When Holt, Tenzsley, and Pinkham arrived at the residence of the known drug dealer, Holt and Tenzsley put on rubber gloves and masks. Holt, Tenzsley and Pinkham then grabbed firearms out of the red sedan. Rather than go to the main residence, where the purported drug dealer lived, Holt and Tenzsley walked to the back of the property, where Gale Neal’s trailer was located. As Holt and Tenzsley approached, Jeremy Neal came to the door of the trailer. Holt immediately began demanding Neal’s money and property.  Moments later, Holt fired two shots, killing Jeremy Neal. Holt then turned to Gale Neal, who leaned back into the couch in fear, and fired two more shots, killing Gale. Throughout, Tenzsley was standing guard, armed with a shotgun and his face covered by a mask.

    After the robbery and murder, and while law enforcement was responding to the scene, Tenzsley, Holt, and Pinkham drove towards Nespelem, Washington. As Pinkham was driving the getaway car, Holt fired several additional shots – this time at law enforcement, who was attempting stop the red Camry. During the chase, a Colville Tribal Police Sergeant, who was cross-deputized as a federal officer, was hit in the forearm.  Several additional bullets hit the Sergeant’s patrol vehicle. After shooting the first officer, Holt opened fire at a second Colville Tribal Police Officer, who also had attempted to stop the red sedan. Evidence at trial established that Tenzsley reloaded firearm magazines as Holt continued to fire at law enforcement to evade apprehension after murdering the Neals.

    When Holt, Tenzsley, and Pinkham later arrived in the Nespelem area, the three men tried to hide the getaway car under a tarp and fled on foot. They also hid their firearms and ammunition throughout the Nespelem area. When Holt and Tenzsley were finally apprehended the next day, Tenzsley gave a false name.  Holt got into fist fight with a concerned citizen, who had called the police just prior to Holt’s arrest.

    During the investigation into the murders of Jeremy and Gale Neal, Tribal and federal law enforcement identified a series of other crimes that Holt and Tenzsley committed as part of their six-week crime spree and conspiracy. On September 3, 2022, Holt and Tenzsley robbed and severely assaulted a man at gunpoint inside his trailer in Latah County, Idaho. The pair stole ammunition, gun parts, the victim’s car keys, and a safe containing the title to the victim’s camper trailer. As Holt and Tenzsley were fleeing the robbery scene, they exchanged fire with the robbery victim.

    Additional evidence established that on October 12, 2022, Holt and Tenzsley, who again were both armed, invaded two homes and assaulted multiple victims on the Nez Perce Indian Reservation in Lapwai, Idaho. The evidence at trial showed that Holt and Tenzsley were again looking for someone to rob when they committed these assaults.  During the second home invasion that evening, Holt and Tenzsley shot a dog in the face on the Nez Perce Reservation. Fortunately, the dog survived the gunshot.

    In the days immediately after the Lapwai, Idaho assaults, Holt and Tenzsley traveled to Keller, Washington – leading to the tragic deaths of Gale and Jeremy Neal, as well as the attempted murder of one federal officer and the assault of another.  The firearm used in the shooting on the Nez Perce Reservation was the same gun Holt and Tenzsley used during the Neal murders, as well as the attempted murder and assault of the two federal officers.

    “On October 20, 2022, these defendants tragically destroyed too many lives to count.  They killed two innocent members of the Colville Tribe, permanently injured a dedicated Tribal officer, and opened fire at another officer,” Acting United States Attorney Barker added.  “On the day of these senseless crimes, the entire Nespelem community was in lock down, while Tribal and federal police sought to apprehend Mr. Holt and Mr. Tenzsley. The community then rallied in typical Colville fashion to support the investigation and prosecution of those responsible. Similarly, the Nez Perce Reservation’s Tribal Police Department was instrumental in bringing the Defendants to justice for the criminal conspiracy that began in Northern Idaho.”   

    Acting U.S. Attorney Barker continued, “The subsequent investigation involved numerous witness interviews across three Tribal communities in two states, dozens of search warrants, extensive forensic testing by the Washington State Patrol, voluminous legal filings, and numerous meetings with victims and their families. In the end, our entire district came together to seek justice for the Neal family and the officers, who were shot and nearly killed. Without our state, local, and Tribal partnerships, as well as every member of my office, the outcome of this case and investigation could have gone much differently. I am particularly grateful for the incredible team of victim advocates, litigation technology specialists, legal support staff, and Assistant United States Attorneys, who worked tirelessly on this case.  Our team shows up every day to help keep our communities, neighborhoods, and reservations safe, and this case is just one example of the amazing things our office is able to accomplish.”   

    The Chairman of the Colville Tribes, Jarred Michael Erickson, said, “These events were incredibly disruptive to the Colville community. People died and their neighbors had to grapple with shock, grief, and fear as these despicable crimes unfolded. It is extremely gratifying to see justice done today as these murderers will spend the rest of their lives in prison. Criminals everywhere must understand that if they commit their crimes on the Colville Reservation, they will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.”

    Chairman Erickson continued, “Our Colville Tribal Police reacted to this crisis with incredible bravery and professionalism. The murderers shot at two Colville officers as the officers attempted to apprehend them, and seriously injured one officer when they shot him in the forearm. As the Colville police continued to work with other law enforcement agencies throughout the investigation and eventual arrest of these felons, Det. McNulty and Chief Brown distinguished themselves with their efforts to bring these killers to justice. The Colville Tribes is grateful for the efforts of every individual and non-tribal agency that assisted in this case, but we especially want to thank Acting U.S. Attorney Richard Barker, who worked as lead counsel on this case through trial. Richard and his office have been friends and partners to the Colville Tribes for many years now. It is an understatement to say we greatly appreciate the effort and skill the U.S. Attorney’s office devoted to prosecuting this case, and for the work they do every day to keep our community safe.”

    “The ruthless violence Mr. Holt and Mr. Tenzsley displayed will not be tolerated and demonstrates that prison is where they belong. Communities across Idaho and Eastern Washington will be safer with them there.” said W. Mike Herrington, Special Agent in Charge of the FBI’s Seattle field office. “It is fortunate more people were not injured or worse by these two dangerous criminals. I am grateful to the courageous officers who were able to apprehend them and to the investigators who put an end to their crime spree and held them accountable for their violent actions.”

    “This case is a prime example of how interagency cooperation between state, city, county, tribal, and federal partners can lead to communities being kept safe and take criminals off the street,” stated Latah County Sheriff Richard Skiles. “I would personally like to thank our Detective Corporal Ryan Weaver for his exemplary work on this case. I would also like to thank the United States Department of Justice for their relentless prosecution of this case and keeping all local law enforcement agencies involved in this case. Justice has been served.”

    This case was investigated by the Colville Tribal Police Department, the FBI, the FBI’s Salish Safe Trails Task Force, Latah County Sherif’s Office, Nez Perce Tribal Police Department, Idaho State Patrol, Spokane Tribal Police Department, Kalispel Tribal Police Department, Grant County Sheriff’s Office, Okanogan Sheriff’s Office, Ephrata Police Department, Soap Lake Police Department, U.S. Border Patrol, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, the United States Marshals Service, and the Washington State Patrol. The case was prosecuted by Acting United States Attorney Richard R. Barker, Assistant United States Attorney Michael J. Ellis, and Contractor Echo D. Fatsis.

    2:22-cr-00157-TOR

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: Simi Valley Couple Arrested for Abusing Asylum-Seeking Immigrants, Operating Illegal “Work for Smuggling” Scheme

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    LOS ANGELES – A Simi Valley couple were arrested today on charges that they abused asylum-seeking immigrants from Latin American countries by forcing them to do domestic labor around the house and hand over money they earned working outside the home.

    Carolina Rojas, 50, and her husband Jairo John Gastelo, 45, were each charged with one count of conspiracy to commit forced labor and four counts of forced labor.

    Rojas was separately charged with an additional four counts of trafficking with respect to forced labor, three counts of giving immigration documents to unauthorized persons, one count of encouraging and inducing illegal entry, and one count of witness tampering.

    During initial appearances Wednesday afternoon in U.S. District Court in downtown Los Angeles, a federal magistrate judge ordered them detained and scheduled a trial for April 8.

    “As described in the indictment, the defendants smuggled individuals into the United States and exploited them for their own financial gain,” said Acting United States Attorney Joseph McNally. “The enforcement of our immigration laws is critical to preventing forced labor and human trafficking. We will hold accountable those that violate these laws.”

    “Today’s indictment shows the great lengths that the defendants went through to enrich themselves off smuggled aliens,” said HSI Los Angeles Special Agent in Charge Eddy Wang. “Labor trafficking continues to be an ongoing problem in our communities and HSI remains committed to holding traffickers accountable for their deplorable actions.”

    According to the indictment, no later than November 2021 and continuing until at least March 2024, Rojas and Gastelo allegedly worked with each other and others to recruit foreign nationals from specifically Latin American countries to come to the United States for the purpose of providing forced labor upon arrival to their house in Simi Valley.

    Rojas allegedly facilitated the foreign nationals’ entry into the United States by providing initial financial assistance and by making travel arrangements for each victim. Once successfully in the U.S., Rojas helped the victims get transportation to California and eventually to Rojas and Gastelo’s house in Simi Valley.

    After arriving at the house, the defendants allegedly forced the victims to provide around-the-clock childcare for a child with special needs and perform other domestic labor. The victims received no pay for their services and were told by Rojas and Gastelo that their work was performed in exchange for rent at the home.

    The defendants allegedly charged the foreign nationals a fee for being smuggled into the U.S.  In some cases, Rojas connected victims with a nearby McDonald’s in Simi Valley where she had an arrangement with the manager to hire individuals she brought to work there. Rojas and Gastelo would then collect money from the victims’ jobs as repayment for their smuggling fee debt.

    Before getting outside-the-house employment, Rojas allegedly helped procure fraudulent social security cards and permanent resident cards for the victims to use when seeking jobs. Rojas would then bring the victims to a check cashing company, where they could cash their checks in order to pay Rojas and Gastelo.

    If convicted, Rojas and Gastelo face a statutory maximum of five years for conspiracy to commit forced labor and a statutory maximum of 20 years for each charge of forced labor.

    Rojas faces an additional statutory maximum of 20 years for each charge of trafficking with respect to forced labor, a statutory maximum of 10 years for each charge of giving immigration documents to unauthorized persons, a statutory maximum of 10 years for encouraging and inducing illegal entry, and a statutory maximum of 20 years for witness tampering.

    Indictments contain allegations that a defendant has committed a crime. Every defendant is presumed innocent until and unless proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

    Homeland Security Investigations and Immigration and Customs Enforcement investigated this matter.

    Assistant United States Attorneys K. Afia Bondero of the Major Frauds Section and Matt Coe-Odess of the General Crimes Section are prosecuting this case.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-Evening Report: Peter Dutton strongly hints he’ll sack 36,000 public servants. Voters deserve to know what services will be affected

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By John Hawkins, Senior Lecturer, Canberra School of Politics, Economics and Society, University of Canberra

    Peter Dutton and his Coalition colleagues have dithered for several weeks on their plans for the Commonwealth public sector.

    While being upfront that public service jobs would be targeted, they’ve made numerous contradictory statements about the number of public servants who would be sacked if the Coalition wins the coming election.

    But Peter Dutton’s most recent comments confirm that he clearly wants to make significant cuts.

    And it’s hard to see how the sackings wouldn’t erode important front line services that many Australians depend on for help and support.

    36,000 jobs on the line

    This week the opposition leader declared the Coalition would achieve A$24 billion dollars in savings by reducing the size of the public service.

    He was unequivocal. The money would be clawed back over four years and would more than cover the Coalition’s promised $9 billion injection into Medicare.

    Dutton explicitly tied the $24 billion in savings to the 36,000 Commonwealth public servants who have been hired since the last election

    Under the Labor Party, there are 36,000 additional public servants, that’s at a cost of $6 billion a year, or $24 billion over the forward estimates. This program totals $9 billion over that period. So, we’ve well and truly identified the savings.

    While still not nominating a precise number of job cuts, it’s Peter Dutton’s clearest statement of intent to date. By “truly” identifying the savings, 36,000 jobs are on the line. And it accords with Dutton’s earlier comments that the extra workers are not providing value for money for Australian taxpayers.

    (They have) not improved the lives of Australians one iota

    While this sounds like he wants to dismiss them all, senior colleagues are more circumspect.

    According to Nationals leader David Littleproud, the number of job cuts has not yet been decided. Shadow Public Service Minister Jane Hume further muddied the waters by referring to the cuts being by attrition, and excluding frontline services.

    Frontline services

    The public service head count has grown to 185,343, as of June 2024. So cutting 36,000 staff, or even a large proportion of that number, would be a very significant reduction.

    The agencies that added the most public servants between June 2023 and June 2024 were the National Disability Insurance Agency (up 2,193), Defence (up 1,425), Health and Aged Care (up 1,173) and Services Australia (up 1,149).

    Many of these extra staff would be providing invaluable front line services to clients and customer who are accessing essential support.

    And some of the new public servants replaced more expensive outsourced workers. Finance Minister Katy Gallagher has claimed the Albanese government has saved $4 billion of taxpayers’ money by reducing spending on consultants and contractors.

    Rather than the alleged explosion in the size of the bureaucracy, the growth in public service numbers has closely matched the increase in the population. Last year, they accounted for 1.36% of all employed persons, up by only a minuscule degree on the 1.35% in 2016.

    Canberra bashing

    According to Dutton, the 36,000 additional public servants hired under Labor all work in Canberra. It was not a slip of the tongue. The claim is also in the Liberal Party’s pre-election pamphlet.

    But only 37% of the public service workforce is located in the national capital. Half are based in state capitals. A full quarter of those involved in service delivery work in regional Australia.

    The Liberals clearly think they have nothing to lose among Canberra voters, given they have no members or senators from the Australian Capital Territory.

    The coming election will no doubt tell us if Canberra bashing still resonates with voters elsewhere in the country. Dutton has clearly made the political judgement that it does.

    Another night of the long knives?

    A change of government often precipitates a clean out at the top of the public service.

    When the Howard government was elected in 1996, no fewer than six departmental secretaries were sacked on the infamous night of the long knives. Then prime minister Tony Abbott dismissed four departmental chiefs in one fell swoop after taking office in 2013. He didn’t even consult his treasurer before dumping the head of Treasury.

    This pattern of culling senior public servants represents a chilling risk to good policy development. Departmental secretaries concerned about losing their jobs may be reluctant to give the “frank and fearless advice” their positions demand.




    Read more:
    After robodebt, here’s how Australia can have a truly ‘frank and fearless’ public service again


    Spending cuts after the election

    Voters are entitled to know what the Coalition has planned for the public service before they cast their ballots.

    The lack of detail on job losses is matched by a reluctance to outline spending cuts elsewhere. Dutton has ruled out an Abbott-style audit commission. He is prepared to cut “wasteful” spending, but won’t say if it may be necessary to also chop some worthwhile outlays to dampen inflationary pressures.

    Dutton is adamant that any spending cuts by a government he leads will be determined after the election, not announced before it. This does nothing for democratic accountability. It does not give the electorate the chance to cast their votes on the basis of an alternative vision from the alternative government.

    All Australians, not just public servants, deserve to know before polling day just how deep Dutton and the Coalition are really planning to cut.

    John Hawkins is a former public servant and lives in Canberra.

    ref. Peter Dutton strongly hints he’ll sack 36,000 public servants. Voters deserve to know what services will be affected – https://theconversation.com/peter-dutton-strongly-hints-hell-sack-36-000-public-servants-voters-deserve-to-know-what-services-will-be-affected-250797

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI USA: Crapo Votes to Confirm USTR Nominee

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Idaho Mike Crapo
    Washington, D.C.–Today, the U.S. Senate confirmed Jamieson Greer to be United States Trade Representative (USTR) by a bipartisan vote of 56-43.  In remarks delivered on the Floor, U.S. Senate Finance Committee Chairman Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) called on his Senate colleagues to support the nomination, highlighting Mr. Greer’s extensive trade experience and commitment to advancing a robust trade agenda that prioritizes American farmers, ranchers, workers and businesses. 

    As delivered:
    “I rise today to urge my colleagues to vote in favor of the confirmation of Mr. Jamieson Greer, who is nominated to serve as the United States Trade Representative.
    “I think I ought to set a couple of facts straight about President Trump’s utilization of the various policies when he was President the first time. 
    “It was said that wages went down, prices went up and people were going to face terrible, dire consequences if he’s able to follow his trade policies again in this term.
    “The reality is that under President Trump, wages went up, jobs went up, unemployment went down, benefits went up, the economy grew dramatically and we had the strongest economy in our lifetimes because of the policies President Trump pursued.
    “So I don’t think people should let these politics of fear saying that everything President Trump does is going to hurt people convince them otherwise.
    “The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, created in 1962 by Congress, develops and coordinates U.S. international trade policy and oversees trade negotiations with other countries.
    “The U.S. Trade Representative—the role for which Mr. Greer is nominated—historically and statutorily serves as the United States’ principal advisor, negotiator and spokesperson on trade issues.
    “Mr. Greer is well-suited for these roles as demonstrated during his previous tenure as USTR Chief of Staff when he worked with both sides of the aisle in negotiating and securing congressional approval of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, which passed the Senate 89-10. 
    “Throughout the nomination process, Mr. Greer demonstrated his strong commitment to work with Congress in a bipartisan fashion to advance the interests of our farmers, ranchers, fishers and workers.
    “In particular, I applaud Mr. Greer’s commitment to open markets for our farmers and manufacturers by negotiating new agreements and enforcing existing ones. 
    “I fully welcome a return to a USTR that performs its statutory obligation of creating new opportunities for Americans.  And I look forward to USTR’s forthcoming reviews of foreign trade barriers that stymie U.S. investment and exports.
    “I urge my colleagues to join me, now, to advance Mr. Greer’s nomination.
    “It is critical to have a USTR at the helm of these investigations and to support the Administration’s return to an active and robust trade agenda that prioritizes American farmers, ranchers, workers and businesses.”

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: VIDEO: Hickenlooper Speaks Out Against Trump Admin’s False “Energy Emergency”

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Colorado John Hickenlooper
    Hickenlooper: “Let’s call this political theater [out] for what it is: an attempt to accelerate oil and gas projects while at the same time, holding back our renewable energy.”  
    U.S. energy production exceeded consumption by widest margin in U.S. history in 2023
    WASHINGTON – Today, U.S. Senator John Hickenlooper spoke on the Senate floor against the Trump administration’s claim that the U.S. faces a “national energy emergency.” He highlighted that an “all of the above” approach to energy, including historic investments in renewable energy from the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and Inflation Reduction Act, have created a U.S. energy boom and lowered energy costs for working families.
    Hickenlooper’s speech comes ahead of a Senate vote on a resolution to overturn President Trump’s energy emergency declaration.

    “America’s energy economy is booming in large part because of the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and the Inflation Reduction Act – bills that make historic investments in American-made energy. These bills have created more than 400,000 good-paying jobs.
    “Cutting funding from these critical pieces of legislation is going to hit our rural communities the hardest – where it could provide the greatest benefit. It’ll shrink county government revenue. It will force layoffs, and ultimately it will increase the cost of energy. 
    President Trump issued an executive order on January 20th declaring a “National Energy Emergency” claiming that “the policies of the previous administration have driven our Nation into a national emergency where a precariously inadequate and intermittent energy supply, and an increasingly unreliable grid, require swift and decisive action.”
    The president’s claim contradicts widespread evidence that U.S. energy production continues to surpass consumption. Excluding coal, the U.S. produced more energy in 2023 than any other country in the world. 
    Last week, Hickenlooper introduced an amendment to the Republican budget resolution protecting the low cost of energy by blocking Republican-led attempts to slow renewable energy development. Every Republican voted against it. Watch his speech in support of his amendment HERE. To download a full video of Hickenlooper’s remarks, click HERE. A full transcript of his remarks is available below:
    “Mr. President, 
    “The United States is in an energy boom. Our nation has never produced more electricity, oil, and gas than we are producing right now.
    “This ‘all the above’ approach to energy using everything – including solar, wind, and geothermal – is keeping energy prices as low as possible for working families – but at the same time recognizing that climate change is real – and moving towards a clean energy future. Excluding coal, the U.S. produced more energy than any other country in the history of the world in 2023.
    “It appears that some in this administration are determined to undo that progress.
    “Despite American leadership in energy, the President signed an executive order on his first day declaring a ‘national energy emergency.’
    “That sounds dramatic and almost theatrical, because it’s meant to be. Let’s call this political theater for what it is: an attempt to accelerate oil and gas projects while at the same time, holding back our renewable energy.
    “Of course, there are things that we need to be doing to keep energy cleaner, prices lower, and to cement American energy independence.
    “For starters, we need to increase energy production. We need to meet our energy future by streamlining permitting of our new energy projects – of all our energy projects – while at the same time being mindful about the environmental impacts and giving impacted communities a public forum. We need to upgrade our grid. We need to increase clean domestic critical mineral production.
    “But that’s not what his executive order will do. In fact, it won’t do a single one of these things.
    “They claim we’re in an emergency, an ‘energy emergency.’ But they continue to block federal wind and energy permits.
    “They claim we’re in an emergency, an ‘energy emergency.’ But then they ship oil and gas overseas.
    “They [claim we’re in] an ‘energy emergency,’ and yet their actions would cede complete control of what eventually will be an enormous global market in renewable energy to China.
    “The administration has also fired thousands of government workers who play vital roles in American energy – all in the name of government efficiency and giving tax cuts to the ultra-wealthy.
    “Listen, I’m all for making government more efficient. I’ve worked on that most of my public life. If you want to seriously look at how we spend money and where we can actually cut fraud, waste, and abuse – I’m game. But hastily, almost randomly firing Department of Energy employees or letting go 300 workers who maintain our nuclear security and safety, I don’t think that’s the way to do it.
    “Our office has even heard from a private company that is worried that the federal employee responsible for managing their permitting process is about to be fired, placing the entire success of their project at risk. They help bring energy to our local communities. This will stop them dead in their tracks and raise prices for households at the same time.
    “America’s energy economy is booming in large part because of the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and the Inflation Reduction Act – bills that make historic investments in American-made energy. These bills have created more than 400,000 good-paying jobs.
    “And yet, there’s an effort by some in the Congress, mostly Republicans, I should say all Republicans, and the administration, but that effort is to slash and impede the progress that we’ve made. Even though an estimated 70% of the benefits – the jobs, the investments, the increased energy – are going to red states.
    “Cutting funding from these critical pieces of legislation is going to hit our rural communities the hardest – where it could provide the greatest benefit. It’ll shrink county government revenue. It will force layoffs, and ultimately it will increase the cost of energy. 
    “Clean energy isn’t just some liberal boogeyman, it’s not some notion. In fact, most of the energy that’s ready to go as we expand our capacity, that’s ready to go, is clean and affordable. Solar, wind, storage, they make up 95% of the capacity of new energy ready to connect to our grid. Wind generates 10% of our electricity now and will provide much more affordable, renewable energy if more permits were made available.
    “Withholding funds already appropriated by Congress through these laws – if these funds are withheld, energy bills can balloon by up to 12% for American families. That’s at least $240/year for working families that they’ll have to come up with one way or another. And certainly, when you’re struggling to afford eggs at the grocery store, trying to balance your checkbook at the end of the month, the last thing you need is an increase in your energy bill. 
    “Some in Congress, some Republicans have introduced their budget which strips critical services for Coloradans, while adding four trillion dollars to our national debt. All primarily so they can give tax breaks of which more than half go to the ultra-wealthy, who at least many in Colorado don’t even want. 
    “I put an amendment on the floor that would strip any provision from their budget that would raise energy costs for Americans. Now, how can people be opposed to that?
    “And yet every Republican voted against it.
    “I think they’re putting politics over people.  
    “We’re able to keep energy prices low for working families because we use everything – oil, gas, geothermal, wind. So rather than limiting energy sources, proclaiming a false emergency, or firing critical government employees, let’s meet the moment and usher in a new energy future that helps everyone. 
    “A future marked by a resilient energy grid built by American innovation that delivers low-cost, reliable energy for every Coloradan, for every American.
    “If this administration is looking for a bipartisan roadmap on this, we have one.
    “We should pass permitting reform that streamlines review for ALL energy projects, not just oil and gas. We can build a modern electric grid that will reduce energy prices – for all.
    “Let’s continue supporting emerging technologies like advanced geothermal and nuclear so that we can remain dominant in the markets that are emerging.
    “And let’s stop picking winners and losers! The vast majority of new electricity is coming from low-cost solar, wind, and energy storage. Let’s follow the law and let the investments in energy from the past few years go to the communities that need them.
    “Let’s cut the nonsense: this isn’t an energy emergency. It’s an energy opportunity.
    “This administration’s actions certainly would cause an emergency for many Colorado and American working families.
    “Mr. President, I yield back the floor.”

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Ernst Concerned About Long-Term Viability of SBA Loan Program After Biden’s Recklessness

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Joni Ernst (R-IA)
    WASHINGTON – During a Senate Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship hearing on the long-term viability of the Small Business Administration’s (SBA) 7(a) loan program, Chair Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) blasted the Biden administration for loosening the rules and recklessly expanding the program.
    Ernst warned that declining revenues and rising default rates risked forcing taxpayers to foot the bill for the loan program that had previously operated without subsidy.
    Click here to watch Chair Ernst’s remarks.
    Click here to download high-resolution photos.
    During her questioning, Ernst spoke with First National Bank Senior Vice President Timothy Fitzgibbon of West Des Moines about the threat posed by the Biden administration significantly weakening underwriting standards in the 7(a) program.
    She went on to raise concern about the long-term viability of the program after it posted four straight quarters of negative cash flow as a result of rising delinquencies and falling revenue from fees.
    Ernst concluded her questioning by asking the witnesses about the specific role of Lender Service Providers (LSPs) and how it affects SBA lenders and consequently the American taxpayers. 

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Chair Ernst Delivers Opening Remarks at 7(a) Loan Hearing

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Joni Ernst (R-IA)

    WASHINGTON – Today, at the Senate Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship hearing on the Small Business Administration’s (SBA) 7(a) loan program, Chair Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) detailed how the Biden administration’s loosening of rules and reckless expansion of the program increased the risk for American taxpayers.
    Ernst highlighted how the actions of the previous administration opened the door to rising default rates and declining revenues that threaten to force taxpayers to foot the bill for the 7(a) program that has previously operated without subsidies.

    Watch Chair Ernst’s full opening remarks here.
    Ernst’s full opening remarks:
    “Nearly two years ago, we met to discuss the reckless new rules the Small Business Administration (SBA) implemented for the 7(a) loan program.
    “They removed time-tested underwriting standards that mitigated the risk of default for American taxpayers who guarantee these loans.
    “These new rules also opened the door to foreseeable fraud by enabling a potentially unlimited number of unregulated, non-depository institutions to become permanently licensed SBA lenders as Small Business Lending Companies, or SBLCs.
    “The last administration’s 7(a) rules were the most drastic changes to the program in decades, which is why members on a bipartisan basis voiced their concerns. Unfortunately, those concerns fell on deaf ears.
    “I aggressively sought to understand how the SBA was selecting and approving these new SBLCs to participate in 7(a). 
    “The types of lenders the SBA was looking to license – fintechs – were responsible for facilitating widespread financial fraud and improper payments in the Paycheck Protection Program.
    “I ask unanimous consent to enter into the record an April 24, 2024, letter that I sent with House Small Business Committee Chairman Williams to the SBA requesting information on the SBLC selection process. Without objection, so ordered.
    “Two years later, we still have little insight. Even the recent SBA’s Inspector General (IG) report on the subject was woefully inadequate.
    “The IG report stated the SBA followed its own procedures, but they failed to evaluate whether those procedures were adequate.
    “The IG didn’t bother to investigate whether there was collusion between SBA officials and one of the largest applicants for a lending license, Funding Circle US.
    “Nor did the report answer why the SBA and the IG concluded the cash position of Funding Circle US was sufficient, despite the fact that it was losing millions.
    “The Biden SBA’s dangerous loosening of the underwriting and eligibility rules weren’t the only efforts to undermine the financial soundness of the 7(a) loan program.
    “A year before the rule, the agency started to cut the fees charged to borrowers and lenders—fees meant to protect the taxpayer from having to subsidize bad loans.
    “For three years straight, the SBA cut these fees, inexplicably allowing loans of up to one million dollars to be made without the borrower or lender having to pay for the guarantees the American taxpayer provided.
    “As I said in a letter to President Trump on January 21st, the looming 7(a) fee increases are entirely due to the previous Administration’s incompetent management of the program, which has harmed taxpayers and the small businesses saddled with debt they can’t manage, while irresponsible lenders get paid no matter what.
    “I ask unanimous consent to enter this letter into the record. Without objection, so ordered.
    “We are seeing the impacts of these rule changes, with the 12-month default rate more than doubling to roughly 3.2 percent since these rules went into effect, and defaults on loans less than 18 months old nearly tripling to almost one and a half percent over that same period.
    “While the Biden-Harris SBA tried to blame this on rising interest rates, defaults on SBA loans have been increasing faster than those in the private sector, which is evidence of poor policy decisions.
    “It should come as no surprise that for the first time in 12 years, 12 years, the 7(a) program lost money.
    “This negative cash flow must be immediately addressed by reversing the misguided decisions of the past administration.
    “This program was designed to operate with zero subsidy – and I worry we are on the cusp of forcing taxpayers to foot the bill, something we should avoid at all costs.
    “I want to commend Administrator Loeffler for her recognition of these problems in her day one memo released this week and her willingness to hit the ground running.
    “It is clear that the solvency of the SBA’s lending programs is a major priority for the Administrator, who has committed to doing what’s necessary to ensure their zero-subsidy status is secure.
    “Today’s hearing provides an opportunity for us to speak with SBA participants to understand their concerns about the 7(a) program’s financial stability.
    “It also allows the Committee to gather concrete suggestions on ways to reduce the risk faced by taxpayers while ensuring the program continues to be a resource for entrepreneurs who need assistance accessing capital.
    “I’d like to thank our witnesses for being here today and I look forward to your testimony.”

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Spokane Police Chief Joins Cantwell for Hearing on Fentanyl Trafficking on U.S. Transportation Networks

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Washington Maria Cantwell

    02.26.25

    Spokane Police Chief Joins Cantwell for Hearing on Fentanyl Trafficking on U.S. Transportation Networks

    Cantwell bill to help law enforcement detect more fentanyl traffickers has been endorsed by Seattle, King Co., Vancouver, Spokane, and Spokane Co. Police Departments; SPD Chief: “Any tool will help us down this road, whether it’s x-ray technology, vapor technology [or] canine technology”

    WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senator Maria Cantwell, ranking member of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation and senior member of the Senate Finance Committee, invited Spokane Chief of Police Kevin Hall to participate in a Commerce Committee hearing titled, “Interdicting Illicit Drug Trafficking: A View from the Front Lines.”

    During the hearing, Sen. Cantwell discussed how her legislation, the Stop Smuggling Illicit Synthetic Drugs on U.S. Transportation Networks Act, could boost law enforcement’s ability to detect fentanyl being smuggled via commercial aircraft, railroads, vehicles, and ships.

    In his opening remarks, Spokane Police Chief Kevin Hall explained how cartels utilize U.S. transportation networks to traffic fentanyl across state lines: “Recent seizures highlight the scale of trafficking along transportation routes,” said Chief Hall. “[The] Spokane supply chain follows similar patterns, moving drugs from Mexico along interstates, I-19, I-10 and I-5, before reaching Eastern Washington via I-90. Spokane officers have recently encountered bulk powder fentanyl, an emerging and highly dangerous trend.”  

    “The supply chain is clear: the Chinese Triad sells precursor chemicals to Mexican drug cartels, hidden on ships and in air cargoes, and cartels make fentanyl and smuggle it through the United States,” said Sen. Cantwell. “They hide fentanyl and personal vehicles, commercial trucks, buses, trains, planes and even on unmanned aerial vehicles. So, this is a danger to our national security and our transportation security. It is very highly toxic.

    During the hearing, Chief Hall – who previously served 32 years for the Tucson Police Department, about an hour’s drive from the Southern border — described the elaborate methods used by cartels to smuggle fentanyl pills into the country: “The investment by the cartels — and make no mistake, this is all cartel driven — is such that they will completely disassemble a vehicle, a brand new vehicle, put as much narcotics into every single void inside that vehicle, and then assemble it again. They will go through that amount of energy, put the vehicle back together, and put it on the road and it’s off on the freeways.”

    That was the case in a pair of busts led by the Tucson Police Department in October and November of 2024, when 1.7 million pills were discovered stashed away in vehicles just north of the border: “Two nondescript sedans that had to be completely disassembled in order to recover all of those narcotics,” Chief Hall said.

    “This is why I want us to have a more collaborative effort here. . . . they’re tearing cars apart, and so, what do you think a new vapor technology could help us do?” Sen. Cantwell asked.

    “Any tool will help us down this road, whether it’s x-ray technology, vapor technology, even going to like, I call old school, canine technology. They’re all very effective in different ways,” said Chief Hall.

    In September 2024, Sen. Cantwell introduced the Stop Smuggling Illicit Synthetic Drugs on U.S. Transportation Networks Act. This bill would create first-ever inspection strategies to stop drug smuggling by commercial aircraft, railroads, vehicles, and ships. The legislation would boost local, state, federal, and tribal law enforcement resources, increase inspections at ports of entry, and deploy next generation non-intrusive detection technologies – similar to handheld security wands that can detect traces of illicit substances in vehicles or on persons during inspections.

    Sen. Cantwell held a press conference with Spokane Police Chief Hall and Spokane County Sheriff John Nowels on this legislation at Spokane Fire Station 1 this past October. Photos from that press conference are available HERE.

    Sen. Cantwell’s bill aims to support law enforcement in stemming the flow of fentanyl into our communities. The bill would supply more resources to carry out actions like the major bust at SeaTac Airport and the University District neighborhood completed by the Seattle office of Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) last fall, or the bust led by the Drug Enforcement Administration, Bureau of Indian Affairs, and others that prevented more than 100 pounds of illegal drugs from being trafficked across the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation in April 2023.

    At today’s hearing, Chair Ted Cruz (R-TX) committed to working with Sen. Cantwell on legislation to stop illicit fentanyl smuggling in the United States.

    “Intercepting illicit drugs like fentanyl at airports is challenging, but we’re grateful to be working with partners at all levels to combat drugs being imported into our communities,” said Port of Seattle Commission President Toshiko Hasegawa. “Many of these drugs are in checked bags and go through a screening process, but the struggle lies in bridging the gap between technology and legal restrictions. The POSPD drug interdiction unit, alongside our drug detection canines, are successfully seizing large quantities of fentanyl pills and other substances and remain committed to making our communities and the airport safer.”

    Sen. Cantwell has pursued multiple paths to addressing the fentanyl crisis, including holding a statewide listening tour to hear directly from people on the front lines of the fentanyl crisis; urging committees of jurisdiction to convene hearings and consider legislative solutions; voting for new laws to provide funding and tools to confront the crisis; and securing funding specifically for Washington state to respond to the crisis.

    Among other measures to fight fentanyl trafficking, last year Sen. Cantwell voted for $1.69 billion in new federal funding to combat fentanyl and other illicit drugs coming into the United States, including an additional $385.2 million to increase security at U.S. ports of entry, with the goal of catching more illegal drugs like fentanyl before they make it across the border.  That funding included critical resources for Non-Intrusive Inspection (NII) technology at land and seaports of entries. NII technologies—like large-scale X-ray and Gamma ray imaging systems, as well as a variety of portable and handheld technologies—allow U.S. Customs and Border Protection to help detect and prevent contraband from being smuggled into the country without disrupting flow at the border. 

    A background document on Sen. Cantwell’s legislative track record and advocacy to combat the fentanyl crisis is available HERE.

    Video of Chief Hall’s full opening remarks is HERE and a transcript is HERE. Video of Sen. Cantwell’s opening remarks is HERE; video of their Q&A is HERE; and a transcript is HERE.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: SBA “Gutted its Civil Service Workforce Around the Country,” Writes Cantwell in Letter to Administrator Loeffler

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Washington Maria Cantwell
    02.26.25
    SBA “Gutted its Civil Service Workforce Around the Country,” Writes Cantwell in Letter to Administrator Loeffler
    Small Business Administration provides education and financial support to entrepreneurs, including disaster relief loans Sen. Cantwell joined all Democratic members of the Senate Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship in letter demanding that Administrator Loeffler end arbitrary firings & review their legality
    WASHINGTON, D.C. – Last week, U.S. Senator Maria Cantwell (D-WA), a senior member of the Senate Finance Committee and ranking member of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, joined the Democratic members of the Small Business Committee in sending a letter to Small Business Administration (SBA) Administrator Kelly Loeffler. The letter demands answers on the recent arbitrary mass firings by the Trump administration of SBA public servants, including loan and disaster assistance staff and veterans.
    “Over the past week, the Small Business Administration (SBA) has taken unprecedented personnel actions that have gutted its civil service workforce around the country,” wrote the Senators in the letter. “This includes the firing of hundreds of SBA employees serving their probationary work period. Yet, SBA has provided us with no direct information about these terminations, including why they were undertaken, the number and identities of fired employees, or which SBA offices were impacted.”
    The Senators continued, “In order to ensure small businesses continue to receive the SBA services they need to thrive, we request the following: First, put an immediate stop to the arbitrary firings of career civil servants and reinstate them immediately, with backpay. Second, have your Deputy Inspector General conduct a thorough review of the SBA’s actions to ensure that any termination was lawful. And third, promptly brief the Committee’s minority staff on SBA’s recent personnel actions and its plan to implement the President’s deferred resignations and RIF executive order.”
    The SBA provides several key services to small business owners in Washington state, including educational programs, and financial support like disaster relief loans.
    The Senators’ letter asks the Administrator to direct the Deputy Inspector General to undertake this thorough review because President Trump recently fired the SBA Inspector General when he illegally fired at least 17 Inspectors General (IGs) in a mass Friday night firing, leaving a vacancy in that position.  Last week, Sen. Cantwell joined 26 Senate Democrats in filing an amicus brief in support of a lawsuit brought by eight of those fired IGs challenging their illegal firings by Trump.  The former SBA IG is one of the plaintiffs in that suit challenging Trump’s unlawful action.
    In a January meeting with former Sen. Kelly Loeffler (R-GA), President Donald Trump’s then-nominee to lead the SBA, Sen. Cantwell emphasized the critical importance of aid to small businesses following disasters. Earlier that month, the SBA opened two Disaster Loan Outreach Centers in Washington specifically to help businesses and residents who incurred losses during the November 2024 bomb cyclone that struck Washington state.
    In June 2024, Sen. Cantwell introduced the Small Business Artificial Intelligence Training and Toolkit Act, which would authorize the Department of Commerce to work with the SBA to create and distribute artificial intelligence resources and tools to help small business leverage AI in their operations.
    The State of Washington is home to 672,472 small businesses, making up 99.5 percent of all WA businesses and employing 1.4 million workers, or 48.4% of all Washington employees. Between March 2022 and March 2023, small businesses created 61,763 new jobs, accounting for 80.5 percent of all net job creation in WA.
    The full text of the letter is available HERE.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: Bridging Tax Gap Demands Urgent Attention, Deputy Secretary-General Tells Group of 20 Side Event

    Source: United Nations MIL OSI b

    Following are UN Deputy Secretary-General Amina Mohammed’s remarks at the Group of 20 (G20) side event — Domestic Resource Mobilization:  Bridging the Tax Gap, held in Cape Town, South Africa, today:

    It is a pleasure to join you for this important discussion on domestic resource mobilization and bridging the tax gap.  This challenge stands at the heart of financing sustainable development and demands our urgent attention.

    We are not on track to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).  We have an estimated $4 trillion sustainable development financing gap annually.  Domestic public finance is essential for financing the Sustainable Development Goals, increasing equity and strengthening macroeconomic stability.

    Robust fiscal systems, including both tax and expenditure, drive economic growth, industrial transformation and environmental sustainability — contributing to alleviating poverty and reducing inequalities.  Beyond raising revenue, taxation remains fundamental to fairness, trust and sovereignty.

    Yet, after significant increases in taxation in developing countries in the decade before 2009, average tax-to-gross domestic product (GDP) ratios for all developing country groups are below 2010 levels, remaining far below those of developed countries. 

    Successive shocks over the last two decades have severely impacted the mobilization of domestic resources for development.  As global crises intensify, it becomes more critical than ever to increase countries’ taxation capabilities.

    The good news is that there is a large unmet tax potential in many developing countries.  Many Governments have invested in tax reforms, demonstrating how nations can unlock unmet potential.

    Strengthening tax systems requires sustained investment in capacity development based on country needs and priorities.  As economies evolve, so must tax systems.

    The increasingly digitalized economy presents new opportunities but also poses new challenges to an international tax system that has been designed for traditional business models.

    We must develop future-ready tax policies that ensure global fair taxation without imposing excessive burdens — both on taxpayers and tax authorities.  Many organizations — including the UN, International Monetary Fund (IMF), Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), World Bank and regional and national tax bodies — are supporting countries in this effort.

    Initiatives like Tax Inspectors Without Borders help countries enhance domestic revenue mobilization.  The Addis Tax Initiative and broader multilateral and regional efforts provide platforms for collaboration, knowledge-sharing and technical assistance.

    However, political will remains insufficient — with countries not investing enough in tax system reform and administration capacity, and donors not delivering promised assistance for supporting revenue mobilization.

    The fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in Sevilla in June offers a pivotal moment to turn commitments for domestic tax reforms into actions and make tax systems more fair, transparent, efficient and effective.

    In our interconnected world, strengthening countries’ fiscal frameworks must go hand in hand with international tax cooperation. Every year, billions of dollars that should fund education, healthcare and infrastructure are lost to tax avoidance and evasion, illicit financial flows and financial crime.

    Africa alone loses approximately $88.6 billion annually to illicit financial flows — around 3.7 per cent of the continent’s GDP — draining resources vital for economic development.

    The G20 has played an important role in advancing tax transparency and tackling tax avoidance.  Expanding the automatic exchange of information and enhancing transparency in beneficial ownership remain paramount.

    But, more must be done to ensure that all countries — particularly those with limited administrative capacity — can fully participate in shaping global tax norms.

    The ongoing negotiations on a UN Framework Convention on International Tax Cooperation present a historic opportunity for progress towards a fair, inclusive, and effective international tax system.

    Through the Pact for the Future, Member States have committed to improving the inclusiveness and effectiveness of tax cooperation under the UN.  Ensuring that international tax rules reflect the diverse needs, priorities and capacities of all countries is central to this effort.

    The two early protocols in the UN Convention — on taxation of income from cross-border services in a digitalized and globalized economy and on preventing and resolving tax disputes — can demonstrate an inclusive and impactful approach.

    The UN process can strengthen global cooperation, enhance legitimacy, certainty, resilience and fairness of international tax rules, while addressing challenges in domestic resource mobilization and ensuring that all countries have a seat at the table.

    Today’s discussion is an opportunity to drive forward these critical issues.  The United Nations remains fully committed to these efforts.  Together, we can build a fairer, more transparent and more effective international tax system — one that provides every country with the means to invest in its future and achieve the Sustainable Development Goals.

    MIL OSI United Nations News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: SMSF auditor compliance focus for 2025

    Source: Australian Department of Revenue

    Last year we had over 32,000 new funds enter the sector. This was an increase of 21% from 2022–23. The population of SMSFs has grown to over 625,000 and now holds over $1 trillion in assets.

    SMSF auditors have a critical role in maintaining the health and integrity of the sector, so it’s important you understand your obligations and where we consider the biggest risks exist in 2025. Where we find that auditors are not complying with their obligations, we may refer them to the Australian Securities & Investments Commission (ASIC) for further action.

    Market valuations

    Approved SMSF auditors are responsible for verifying and retaining sufficient audit evidence to support the market value of assets. Where there’s insufficient evidence you must consider modifying the independent auditor’s report (IAR). You must also lodge an auditor contravention report (ACR) where the reporting criteria is met.

    In 2024, the ATO contacted auditors where SMSFs they audited reported unchanged values for certain assets across several income years. In 2025, we will continue this program, including reviewing auditors where asset values remain the same and no ACR is lodged.

    High volume auditors

    In 2025, we will continue our focus on auditors who audit a large number of SMSFs. This includes auditors that regularly undertake over 1,000 audits per year or who have had a rapid increase in their audit numbers in recent years. We will be visiting auditors at their offices to review their audit process.

    Disqualified trustees

    Auditors must confirm that the trustees of the SMSF are not acting as a trustee or director of a corporate trustee while a disqualified person. In 2025, we are reviewing auditors where our information indicates trustees have acted while a disqualified person and no ACR has been lodged.

    High risk auditors

    We collect a range of data and intelligence about the SMSF auditor population. We use this information to identify auditors we consider high risk. We will continue to conduct audits of high-risk auditors and refer them to ASIC when they have not complied with their obligations.

    Auditors with low fixed price business models continue to be a concern for the ATO. These models inherently restrict the amount of time an auditor can spend on an audit and can lead to lower quality audits, particularly where the SMSF has more complex investments.

    Independence

    As an approved SMSF auditor, you’re required to comply with independence requirements as part of your professional obligations.

    Following an increase of referrals to ASIC in the last financial year that included independence issues, we’ll be focusing on auditors we consider high risk. This includes auditors:

    • conducting in-house audits
    • with reciprocal auditing arrangements
    • that have a long association with clients and
    • have a large proportion of their client base come from a single referral source.

    You need to ensure you’re meeting the independence requirements set out in APES 110 Code of Ethics for Professional AccountantsExternal Link (including Independence Standards).

    For more information, see ato.gov.au/smsfauditors.

    Looking for the latest news for SMSFs? You can stay up to date by visiting our SMSF newsroom and subscribingExternal Link to our monthly SMSF newsletter.

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Creating a new USI

    Source: Australian Department of Revenue

    Fund trustees, through a digital service provider, should submit the new product details as soon as possible before the new data is to take effect.

    When submitting details for a new USI, or updating bank details, it’s important to first lodge a Financial institution account verification contact details template through Online Services for Business. Once approved you’ll then be able to submit the details through the portal.

    Ensure all information is accurate and complete to avoid any processing delays. After submission, it’s important you verify the new USI has been correctly registered and is active.

    If you’re updating critical data, it’s best practice to provide these details immediately but at least 28 days before they become effective. This lead time allows gateways and clearing houses to adequately reflect the updated information.

    Updates to critical data include changes to:

    • bank details
    • end-point service address
    • end-dating.

    For more detailed information, refer to our Fund Validation Service User Guide

    Looking for the latest news for Super funds? You can stay up to date by visiting our Super funds newsroomOpens in a new window and subscribingOpens in a new window to our monthly Super funds newsletter and CRT alerts.

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Small business boost measures risks

    Source: Australian Department of Revenue

    Our focus

    If your business meets the standard aggregated annual turnover rules (with an increased $50 million threshold), you may be eligible to claim an additional 20% tax deduction under the:

    Small business skills and training boost

    The small business skills and training boost applies to eligible expenditure incurred from 7:30 pm AEDT on 29 March 2022 until 30 June 2024. The expenditure must be for the provision of external training courses delivered to your employees by registered training providers.

    Small business technology investment boost

    The small business technology investment boost applies to eligible expenditure incurred between 7:30 pm AEDT on 29 March 2022 and 30 June 2023. The boost is for business expenses and depreciating assets to help digitise your small business. It is capped at $100,000 of expenditure per income year. You can receive a maximum bonus deduction of $20,000 per income year.

    How to get it right

    We are seeing some small businesses incorrectly claim the boost measures due to errors or misunderstanding of the law.

    If you claimed either boost measure and believe you don’t meet the eligibility criteria or have made an error, we encourage you to amend your tax return.

    If you incorrectly claim, we may get in contact with you or your tax professional. If no action is taken, we may conduct a review and audit of your business.

    See how to avoid errors and claim correctly for the:

    Skills and training boost

    The errors we are seeing some small businesses make when claiming the skills and training boost include:

    If you are planning on claiming, ensure you meet the skills and training boost eligibility criteria, and check:

    • it’s for an expense that was incurred between 7:30 pm AEDT on 29 March 2022 and 30 June 2024
    • it’s for expenditure with a registered external training provider that is not you or an associate of yours
    • it’s for the provision of training to employees of your business, either in-person in Australia, or online
    • where you are a sole trader, the training is for your employees not yourself
    • the training is already deductible for your business.

    Example: claiming skills and training boost

    Maya and Jackson are directors and shareholders of Sports Academy Pty Ltd. The company has no employees.

    Sports Academy Pty Ltd spend $6,240 on a bookkeeping training course with a registered training provider for Maya. Sports Academy Pty Ltd claim a 20% ($1,248) skills and training boost deduction on its 2022–23 company tax return.

    However, because Maya is not an employee of the company, Sports Academy Pty Ltd is not eligible to claim the skills & training boost deduction. The deduction they claimed is disallowed.

    Sports Academy Pty Ltd must amend their company tax return to exclude the skills and training boost deduction. This adjustment increases the company’s taxable income, leading to a higher tax liability for the 2023 income year.

    Sports Academy Pty Ltd lodge an amended company tax return. It reflects the corrected taxable income. They later receive a notice of assessment, which shows an adjusted tax liability for the 2023 income year.

    End of example

    Technology investment boost

    The errors we are seeing some small businesses make when claiming the technology investment boost include:

    • expenses not meeting definition of eligible digital expenditure
    • exceeding annual turnover threshold requirement
    • claims exceeding the cap on expenditure
    • claims by businesses with no reported depreciating assets
    • incorrectly claiming over multiple years.

    If you are planning on claiming, ensure you meet the technology investment boost eligibility criteria, and check:

    • it’s for an expense that was incurred between 7:30 pm AEDT on 29 March 2022 and 30 June 2023.
    • it’s for expenditure of business expenses or depreciating assets (or both) to help digitise your small business
    • the expense is already deductible for your business.

    Example: claiming technology investment boost

    Sami, Omar and Leila are directors of a private company. It supplies pharmaceutical products to retailers and other businesses.

    In May 2022 the directors of Pharmacy Supplies Pty Ltd decide to:

    • purchase an electronic point-of-sale system and accounting software, at a cost of $30,000. This is to improve record keeping and better understand their business. It will be used from 1 July 2022
    • invest in a cyber security system and plan from 1 July 2022 to move to a digital record keeping system. It will cost $40,000 to start and $5,000 a year for updates and maintenance
    • modernise their website and implement a mobile app, which will go live in September 2022, at a cost of $40,000.

    Pharmacy Supplies Pty Ltd has spent $110,000 on eligible costs in the 2023 income year. Pharmacy Supplies Pty Ltd claims a $22,000 tech investment boost deduction for 2022–23.

    However, due to the $100,000 cap on eligible business expenses and depreciating assets, or $20,000 per income year, Pharmacy Supplies Pty Ltd has incorrectly claimed $2,000 more than allowed.

    Pharmacy Supplies Pty Ltd must amend its 2022–23 company tax return. It must reduce the technology investment boost deduction. This adjustment increases the company’s taxable income, leading to a higher tax liability for the 2023 income year.

    Pharmacy Supplies Pty Ltd lodges an amended company tax return, reflecting the corrected taxable income. They later receive a notice of assessment, which shows an adjusted tax liability for the 2023 income year.

    End of example

    Keep up to date

    Learn more by taking our free self-paced online courses at:

    You can also:

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI: Rate Partners with NASCAR’s Ricky Stenhouse Jr. to Fast-Track Homebuying at EchoPark Automotive Grand Prix

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    CHICAGO, Feb. 26, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Speed wins — on the track and in the real estate market. That’s why Rate, a leader in fintech mortgage solutions, is teaming up with NASCAR driver Ricky Stenhouse Jr. and Hyak Racing for the EchoPark Automotive Grand Prix on March 2, 2025, at the Circuit of The Americas in Austin, Texas.

    Stenhouse, a Daytona 500 champion known for tearing up the track, will race in the #47 car backed by Rate, bringing together two forces built for speed, precision, and relentless execution.

    “Rate is a powerhouse in mortgages, and I’m a beast on the track, so we’ve got a lot in common,” said Stenhouse. “Top teams behind us, driven to win, and damn fast — all day, every day. If you’re ready to move on a home purchase, hit up Rate.com.”

    Fast Track to Homeownership

    In today’s housing market, speed is everything. Buyers who move fast win — and Rate is leading the charge with lightning-fast pre-approvals, real-time underwriting, and automated income and asset verification.

    “When it comes to buying a home, speed wins,” said Scott Stephen, Chief Growth Officer for Rate. “Rate offers mortgage approvals in mere minutes, giving buyers a real edge in a market where every second counts.”

    And the numbers back it up. According to Rate’s 2024 Homebuying Survey:

    • 67% of homebuyers say the mortgage process is stressful — and slow approvals are a top frustration.
    • 43% of buyers make multiple offers before landing a home — speed is the advantage.
    • 37% of buyers say pre-approvals take 3-5 days — Rate cuts that down dramatically.

    The 2024 Homebuying Survey revealed that homebuyers face overwhelming stress, decision-making challenges, and a lack of confidence when it comes to the mortgage process. With Rate Intelligence, Rate’s AI-powered mortgage technology, homebuyers get ultra-fast approvals with unmatched accuracy — just like Stenhouse’s precision on the track.

    Train Like a Champion

    Beyond speed, wellness matters. That’s why Stenhouse is joining Rate’s Train Like a Champion (TLAC) platform, a wellness initiative featuring elite pro athletes like MMA champion Julianna Peña, NFL quarterback Jameis Winston, and pro pickleball star Grayson Goldin.

    “Staying sharp — physically and mentally — is how I keep my edge on race day,” said Stenhouse. “Strength training, meditation, nutrition — it all matters. And the same tools that keep me focused are right in the Rate App. From guided breathing to better sleep, it’s got everything you need to stay in the zone — on or off the track.”

    Win Big with Rate

    Fans can win exclusive prizes by following Rate’s social channels this week:

    • An autographed Ricky Stenhouse Jr. racing helmet (disclaimer here)
    • Two VIP passes to the EchoPark Automotive Grand Prix

    Review the Official Rules for the Grand Prix here.

    Austin, Tech, and Innovation

    The EchoPark Automotive Grand Prix kicks off just days before SXSW, when global tech leaders descend on Austin. Rate is bringing that same innovation to mortgages — cutting through red tape with industry-leading fintech solutions that make buying a home faster and easier than ever.

    Get ready. The green flag is waving. Visit Rate.com to get in the race.

    About Rate

    Rate Companies is a leader in mortgage lending and digital financial services. Headquartered in Chicago, Rate is the #2 retail mortgage lender in the U.S., with over 850 branches across all 50 states and Washington D.C. Since its launch in 2000, Rate has helped more than 2 million homeowners with home purchase loans and refinances. The company has cemented itself as an industry leader by introducing innovative technology, offering low rates, and delivering unparalleled customer service. Honors and awards include Best Mortgage Lender for First-Time Homebuyers by NerdWallet for 2023; HousingWire’s Tech100 award for the company’s industry-leading FlashClose℠ digital mortgage platform in 2020, MyAccount in 2022, and Language Access Program in 2023; No. 2 ranking in Scotsman Guide’s 2022 list of Top Retail Mortgage Lenders; the most Scotsman Guide Top Originators for 11 consecutive years; Chicago Agent Magazine’s Lender of the Year for seven consecutive years; and Chicago Tribune’s Top Workplaces list for seven straight years. Visit rate.com for more information.

    Media Contact

    press@rate.com

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI USA: Senator Marshall Introduces Legislation to Halt Dangerous Viral Gain of Function Research

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Kansas Roger Marshall
    Washington, DC – U.S. Senator Roger Marshall, M.D. (R-Kansas) today introduced the Dangerous Viral Gain of Function Research Moratorium Act, which calls for the immediate halt of dangerous gain-of-function (GOF) research. GOF research aims to genetically alter a virus or organism to gain or lose function on its transmissibility or pathogenicity. Most evidence suggests the COVID-19 virus is more than likely the product of GOF research conducted in Wuhan, China. Senator Marsha Blackburn (R-Tennessee) is a cosponsor of the legislation. 
    Senator Marshall has repeatedly called for complete transparency and accountability from the federal government regarding the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic. Part of this responsibility requires that all present and future gain-of-function research be halted immediately due to safety concerns.
    “History has proven that viruses can escape even the most secure labs, and gain-of-function research can kill more people than a nuclear weapon,” said Senator Marshall. “The Dangerous Viral Gain-of-Function Research Moratorium Act is critical to ensure the federal government immediately ceases funding for this irresponsible, high-risk work. The era of unaccountable taxpayer-funded science done in the name of ‘global health’ needs to end.”
    “If the COVID pandemic taught us anything, it’s that we cannot allow gain-of-function research to do more harm than good,” said Senator Blackburn. “This legislation would halt all federal research grants involving risky gain-of-function research on potential pandemic pathogens until oversight is improved and safety guardrails become a guarantee.”
    “This bill from Senator Dr. Roger Marshall (R-KS) to stop federal funding of dangerous gain-of-function research is a common sense solution to preventing the next laboratory-acquired infection from becoming another pandemic,” said Dr. Steven Quay, M.D., PhD., Physician-Scientist and CEO of biopharmaceutical company Atossa Therapeutics.
    Click HERE to read the bill text.
    Background:
    In 2024, Senate Democrats blocked Senator Marshall’s effort to pass similar legislation.
    In 2014, The Obama Administration ordered a pause on all gain-of-function research due to increased leaks and infectious material spills from laboratories receiving government dollars.
    In 2017 – with key cabinet appointments vacant or pending Senate confirmations – the National Institute for Health (NIH) successfully advocated for lifting the moratorium.
    Reports released from the Republican-led Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic concluded that “the Wuhan Institute of Virology used NIAID money to conduct ‘gain-of-function’ studies that modified distantly related coronaviruses,” an outcome which undoubtedly led to the global COVID-19 pandemic via a lab-leak. 
    To learn more about Senator Marshall’s oversight efforts of GOF research, click here.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Senator Marshall Introduces Legislation to Prevent Foreign Interference in American Agriculture

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Kansas Roger Marshall
    Washington, DC – U.S. Senator Roger Marshall, M.D. (R-Kansas) introduced the Protecting American Agriculture from Foreign Adversaries Act, which would permanently add the U.S. Secretary of Agriculture to the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) to help prevent improper foreign interference and disruption to the U.S. agriculture industry.
    CFIUS is the governmental body that oversees the vetting process of foreign investment and acquisition of American companies. In addition to permanently adding the Secretary of Agriculture to CFIUS, the bill would require that the Secretary report any transaction that could threaten national security, specifically concerning purchases made by adversarial nations like China, North Korea, Russia, and Iran.
    “Food Security is national security, and it’s high time that we start recognizing this before it is too late,” said Senator Marshall. “The Secretary of Agriculture needs a seat at the table when the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States is considering foreign agricultural investments. Having an agriculture presence on CFIUS helps the committee better understand the risks foreign investment can pose to farmers and ranchers, and the Protecting American Agriculture from Foreign Adversaries Act ensures that.”
    The legislation is cosponsored by Senators John Barrasso (R-Wyoming), Todd Young (R-Indiana), Tammy Baldwin (D-Wisconsin), and Deb Fischer (R-Nebraska).
    “The Chinese Communist Party has proven over and over again they cannot be trusted. They are our adversary, not our ally. All Americans should be alarmed by the amount of American farmland China and other foreign entities own. Giving our adversaries any control over our agricultural resources is a direct threat to our national and food security. Senator Marshall’s legislation will help protect America’s farms and safeguard our food supply,” said Senator Barrasso.
    “Nearly two-thirds of land in Indiana – and more than half of all land in the United States – is farmland,” said Senator Young. “Recent efforts by China and other adversaries to buy agricultural land across the country could present a national security threat. Indiana is a leader in restricting these purchases, but Congress must act to ensure permanent safeguards are in place in all fifty states.”
    “Wisconsin’s farms are the backbone of our state,” said Senator Baldwin. “They’re not just about food, they’re about people’s livelihoods, our economy, and our way of life. That’s why I’m fighting to protect our family farms and agricultural communities from bad actors like China that threaten our food supply, economy, and national security. I’m proud to work with Democratic and Republican colleagues to protect our farmers and rural communities and ensure our Made in Wisconsin agricultural economy stays strong for the next generation.”
    “Allowing our adversaries to have any form of control over our food supply is a dangerous game, and one we should never play. Our commonsense legislation will protect America’s interests by ensuring that any foreign investments in the agricultural sector are thoroughly vetted,” said Senator Fischer.
    U.S. Representative Dan Newhouse (R-Washington-4) also introduced companion legislation in the House of Representatives.
    “The Chinese Communist Party is our most formidable adversary, and we must act immediately to defend our food and national security interests,” said Rep. Newhouse. “Farmers, ranchers, and landowners across the country deserve the certainty offered by adding the Secretary of Agriculture to CFIUS to ensure they are not selling land to an entity controlled by the CCP. We must prevent the CCP from purchasing land near federal property, including military installations and national laboratories, to protect our domestic security interests. I am glad to have the support of my colleagues in the House and Senate on these critical pieces of legislation and appreciate the comments by President Trump and Secretary Rollins to keep our enemies out of our backyard.”
    Specifically, the Protecting American Agriculture from Foreign Adversaries Act would:
    Add the Secretary of Agriculture as a member of CFIUS
    Protect the U.S. agriculture industry from foreign control through transactions, mergers, acquisitions, or agreements
    Designate agricultural supply chains as critical infrastructure and critical technologies
    Require a report to Congress on current and potential foreign investments in the U.S. agricultural industry from USDA and the Government Accountability Office (GAO) 
    Read the bill HERE.
    BACKGROUND:
    Over the past few years, the United States has experienced a rapid increase in foreign investment in the agricultural sector, particularly from China. Growing foreign investment in agriculture and other essential industries, like health care and energy, threatens our country’s national security. 
    According to USDA data from December 2023, foreign investors own approximately 45 million acres of U.S. agricultural land. This represents an increase of over 1.5 million acres in one calendar year. Foreign ownership of U.S. agricultural land increased modestly from 2012 to 2017 at an average increase of 0.6 million acres per year. However, since 2017, this number skyrocketed to an average of 2.6 million acres annually. Additionally, between 2010 and 2021, entities or individuals from China increased their ownership of U.S. agricultural land more than twentyfold, from 13,720 acres to 383,935 acres.
    Data from the 2023 Agricultural Foreign Investment Disclosure Act (AFIDA) report shows that Kansas agricultural land with foreign interest totals over 1.3 million acres.
    CFIUS is authorized to oversee and review foreign investment and ownership in domestic businesses as it relates to national security. Currently, the Committee does not directly consider the needs of the agriculture industry when reviewing foreign investment and ownership in domestic businesses.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA News: Remarks by President Trump Before Cabinet Meeting

    Source: The White House

    class=”has-text-align-center”>Cabinet Room

    11:42 A.M. EST

         THE PRESIDENT:  Okay.  Thank you very much.  We appreciate you being here.  And we’ve put together a great Cabinet.  And we’ve had tremendous success.  We’ve been given a lot of credit for having a very successful first month, and we want to make that many months — and years, actually.  But we’re going to have many good months, and we’re going to have many good years, I hope.  And we’re going to solve a lot of problems. 

         We’re doing very well with Russia-Ukraine.  President Zelenskyy is going to be coming on Friday.  It’s now confirmed.  And we’re going to be signing an agreement, which will be a very big agreement.  And I want to thank Howard and Scott for the job you guys did in putting it together.  Really did an amazing job.  And that’ll be on rare earth and other things. 

         And as you know, we’re in for, probably, $350 billion and Europe is in for $100 billion.  And that’s a big difference.  So, we’re in for, probably, three times as much.  And yet, it’s very important to everybody, but Europe is very close.  We have a big ocean separating us.  So, it’s very important for Europe.  And they, hopefully, will step up and do maybe more than they’re doing and maybe a lot more.

         The previous administration put us in a very bad position, but we’ve been able to make a deal where we’re going to get our money back and we’re going to get a lot of money in the future.  And I think that’s appropriate, because we have taxpayers that are — shouldn’t be footing the bill, and they shouldn’t be footing the bill at more than the Europeans are paying. 

         So, it’s all been worked out.  We’re happy about it.  And I think that, very importantly, we’re going to be able to make a deal. 

         Most importantly, by far, we’re going to make a deal with Russia and Ukraine to stop killing people.  They’ll stop killing young Russian soldiers and young Ukrainian soldiers and other people, in addition, in the towns and cities.  And we will consider that a very important thing and a big accomplishment, because it was going nowhere until this administration came in.  They hadn’t spoken to President Putin in two years.  And so, we’ll keep you advised.

         Before we begin the Cabinet, I’d like to have Scott

    and a couple of people say a few things.  But most importantly — where are you?

         SECRETARY TURNER:  I’m right here, sir.

         THE PRESIDENT:  This is a gentleman who’s going places — the head of HUD.  And he’s going to say — you all know him.  And you’re going to say grace —

         SECRETARY TURNER:  Yes, sir.

         THE PRESIDENT:  — and then we’ll have our meeting, right?

    SECRETARY TURNER:  Yes.

         THE PRESIDENT:  Thank you very much. 

         SECRETARY TURNER:  Thank you, Mr. President.  Let’s pray.

         Father, we thank you for this awesome privilege, Father, to be in your presence.  God, thank you that you’ve allowed us to see this day.  The Bible says that your mercies are new every morning.  And, Father God, we give you the glory and the honor.  Thank you, God, for President Trump, Father, for appointing us.  Father God, thank you for anointing us to do this job.  Father, we pray you’ll give the president and the vice president wisdom, Father God, as they lead. 

         Father, I pray for all of my colleagues that are here around the table and in this room.  Lord God, we pray that we would lead with a righteous clarity, Father God, and as we serve the people of this country and every perspective agency, every job that we have, Father, we would humble ourselves before you that we would lead in a manner that you’ve called us to lead and to serve. 

         Father, the Bible says the blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord.  But, Father, we today honor you.  And in your rightful place, Father, thank you for giving us this opportunity to restore faith in this country and be a blessing to the people of America.  And, Lord God, today in our meeting, we pray that you will be glorified in our conversation.
        
         In Jesus’ name, amen.

         PARTICIPANTS:  Amen.

         THE PRESIDENT:  Scott, that was a very good job you did.  You’ve done that before, haven’t you?  (Laughter.)  Wow. 

         So, Scott Turner is a terrific young guy.  He’s heading up HUD, and he’s going to make us all very proud, right?

         SECRETARY TURNER:  Thank you, Mr. President.  Yes, sir.

         THE PRESIDENT:  Thank you very much.  Great job. 

         In just over one month, illegal border crossings have plummeted by numbers that nobody has actually ever seen before.  It’s much more than 100 percent. 

    And we’ve unleashed American energy at levels that will soon be reported, but we think we’re going to get it going very quickly.  We have incredible people on the energy front. 

    I think we have really great people on every front.  I’ll let you know if they’re not good, but I think they really are. 

    And we’re fighting every day to get the prices down.  The inflation is stopping slowly, but part of the reason it’s stopping is because of high interest rates and other problems that we inherited.  But we have to get the prices down — not the inflation down — the prices of eggs and various other things.  Eggs are a disaster. 

         The secretary of Agriculture is going to be showing you a chart that’s actually mindboggling what’s happened — how low they were with us and how high they are now.  But I think we can do something about it —

         SECRETARY ROLLINS:  Yes, sir.

         THE PRESIDENT:  — Madam Secretary.

         SECRETARY ROLLINS:  Yes, sir.

         THE PRESIDENT:  And I think you’re going to do a fantastic job in that position. 

    One of the most important initiatives is DOGE, and we have cut billions and billions and billions of dollars.  We’re looking to get it maybe to a trillion dollars.  If we can do that, we’re going to start getting to be at a point where we can think in terms of balancing budgets, believe it or not, something you haven’t heard in many, many years — decades, actually.  And it’s a big — whether it’s this year or next year, I think we’ll be very close to balancing budgets.  And the DOGE is very important. 

    And Elon is here to give you a summary of what’s happening, some of the things they found — some of the horrible things they found — some of the theft and fraud, and we call it waste and abuse, but a lot of fraud, and probably some fraud that we’re not going to be able to prove is fraud, but when you hear the names and the places where this money is going, it’s a disgrace. 

         But we’ve requested that a lot of people — we want to make sure that the people are working.  So, letters were sent out, and I think everyone at this table is very much behind it.  And if they aren’t, I’d want them to speak up.  But they’re very much behind it. 

         Letters were sent out to people just to find out, if the people exist, do they work?  Who do they work for?  Where are they?  You know, where have they been working?  Have they been working for other companies or other entities at all and being paid by the government, so they have two jobs, but they’re supposed to have one? 

    And the letter asks some simple questions like, “What have you done lately?”  And if they can answer that — because I can.  I can tell you everything I’ve done for the last long period of time — a lot more than a week. 

    And in many cases, we haven’t gotten responses.  Usually that means that maybe that person doesn’t exist or that person doesn’t want to say they’re working for another company while being paid by the United States government. 

    So, there’s a lot of interesting things.  It’s very unique, but we have a very unique situation because we have a lot of people that were scamming our country.  We have a lot of dishonest people.  We have a lot of people that took advantage of a lot of different situations, and we’re not going to let that happen. 

    So, I’m going to ask, if it’s possible, to have Elon get up first and talk about DOGE, because it seems to be of great interest to everyone. 

    I will say that there is a large group of people in this country that have such admiration for what we’re doing.  I got elected with a tremendous vote — winning every swing state, winning the popular vote, winning the counties by thousands of counties.  I think it was 2,800 to 500.  2,800 counties to 500 counties.  Think of that. 

    And so, we have a mandate to do this, and this is part of the reason I got elected.  I got elected based on taxes and based on many things, the border, but also based on balancing budgets and getting our country back into shape, and this is a big part of it. 

    So, Elon, if you could get up and explain where you are, how you’re doing, and how much we’re cutting.  And it’s an honor to have you.  He’s been a tremendously successful guy.  He’s really working so hard.  And he’s got businesses to run.  And in many ways, they say, “How do you do this?”  And, you know, he’s sacrificing a lot and — getting a lot of praise, I’ll tell you, but he’s also getting hit.  And we would expect that, and that’s the way it works. 

    So, I’d like to have Elon Musk please say a few words.

         MR. MUSK:  Well, tha- — thank you —
        
         THE PRESIDENT:  Thank you, Elon.

    MR. MUSK:  Thank you, Mr. President.  Well, I a- — I actually just call myself humble tech support here — (laughter) — because this is actually — as crazy as it sounds, that — that is almost a literal description of the work that the DOGE team is doing is helping fix the government computer systems.  Many of these systems are extremely old.  They don’t communicate.  There are a lot of mistakes in the systems.  The software doesn’t work.  The — so, we are actually tech support.  It’s — it’s a — it’s ironic, but it’s true.

    The — the overall goal here with the DOGE team is to help address the enormous deficit.  We simply cannot sustain, as a country, $2 trillion deficits.  The interest rates — just the interest on the national debt now exceeds the Defense Department spending. 

    We spend a lot on the Defense Department, but we’re spending, like, over a trillion dollars on interest.  If this continues, the country will go — become de facto bankrupt.  It’s — it’s not an optional thing.  It is an essential thing.  That — that’s — that’s the reason I’m here and taking a lot of flak and getting a lot of death threats, by the way.  I can, like, stack them up, you know.

    But if we don’t do this, America will go bankrupt.  That’s why it has to be done.  And I’m confident, at this point — knock on wood, you know — knock on my wooden head — (laughter) — the — there’s a lot of wood up there — that we can actually find a trillion dollars in savings.  That would be roughly 15 percent of the $7 trillion budget.

    And obviously, that can only be done with the support of everyone in this room.  And I’d like to thank everyone for — for your support.  Thank you very much this.  This — this can only be done with — with your support.

    So, this is — it’s really — DOGE is a support function for the president and for the — the agencies and departments to help achieve those savings and to effect- — effectively find 15 percent in reduction in fraud and — and waste.

    And — and we bring the receipts.  So, people say, like, “Well, is this real?”  Just go to DOGE.gov.  We l- — we — line item by line item, we specify each item.  So — and w- — and I — I should say, we — also, we will make mistakes.  We won’t be perfect.  But when we make mistake, we’ll fix it very quickly. 

    So, for example, with USAID, one of the things we accidentally canceled, very briefly, was Ebola — Ebola prevention.  I think we all wanted Ebola prevention.  So, we restored the Ebola prevention immediately, and there was no interruption.

    But we do need to move quickly if we’re — if we’re to achieve a trillion-dollar deficit reduction in tw- — in — in financial year 2026.  It requires saving $4 billion per day, every day from now through the end of September.  But we can do it, and we will do it.

    Thank you. 

    THE PRESIDENT:  Well, do you have any questions of Elon while we’re on the subject of DOGE?  Because we’ll finish off with that.  And if you would have any questions, please ask — you could ask me or Elon.

    Go ahead, please. 

    Q    Thank you, Mr. President.  Thank you, Mr. Musk.  I just wanted to ask you, the — President Trump put out a Truth Social today saying that everybody in the Cabinet was — was happy with you.  I just wondered if that — if you had heard otherwise, and if you had heard anything about members of the Cabinet who weren’t happy with the way things were going.  And if so, what are you doing to address those — any dissatisfaction?

    MR. MUSK:  To the best of —

    THE PRESIDENT:  Hey, Elon, let the Cabinet speak just for a second.  (Laughter.) 

         Is anybody unhappy with Elon?  If you are, we’ll throw them out of here.  (Laughter.)  Is anybody unhappy?  (Applause.)

    They are — they have a lot of respect for Elon and that he’s doing this.  And some disagree a little bit, but I will tell you, for the most part, I think everyone is not only happy, they’re thrilled. 

    So, go ahead, Elon.

    SECRETARY ROLLINS:  And grateful.

    MR. MUSK:  And President Trump has put together, I think, the best cabinet ever, literally.  So, I — and I do not give false praise.  This — this is an incredible group of people.  I don’t think such a talented team has actually ever been assembled.  I think it’s literally the best cabinet that the country has ever had.  And I think the companies should be incredibly appreciative of the people in this room.

    Q    Mr. President —

    THE PRESIDENT:  Please.  Yeah.  Go ahead.

    Q    Mr. President, thank you.  Mr. Musk.  Are there — about half of the government employees so far appear to have responded to your request for what they’ve been doing over the past week.  Is there a timeline in place for next moves for people being fired?  And when can the American people expect to see results from that?

    MR. MUSK:  Yes.  Well, to be — to be clear, like, the — I think that email, perhaps, was misinterpreted as a performance review, but actually it was a pulse check review.  “Do you have a pulse?”  (Laughter.)  “Do you have a pulse and two neurons?”  (Laughter.)  So, if you have a pulse and two neurons, you can reply to an email.

    This is, you know, I think, not a high bar, is what I’m saying.  This is a — should be — anyone could accomplish this. 

    But what we are trying to get to the bottom of is we think there are a number of people on the government payroll who are dead, which is probably why they can’t respond, and — and some people who are not real people, like they’re literally fictional individuals that are collecting payche- — well, somebody is collecting paychecks on a fictional individual.  So, we’re just literally trying to figure out are these people real, are they alive, and can they write an email, which I think is a reasonable expectation for the Amer- — you know, the American public would have at least that expectation of someone in the public sector.

    Q    Mr. Musk —

    Q    Mr. Musk —

    Q    — roughly a million employees —

    MR. MUSK:  (Laughs.)  This is not a — this is not a high bar, guys.  Come on.  (Laughter.)

    Q    Roughly a million employees have responded so far to this email.  Does that mean that the remaining 1 million or so federal employees now risk being terminated?  And is it your understanding and expectation when you post a directive on X that the Cabinet secretaries will follow that order?  Because several agencies have instructed employees that this is voluntary or not to respond.

    MR. MUSK:  Yeah.  Well, I mean, to be cl — so, I guess there was a — like, last week, the president en- — encouraged me, via Truth Social and also via phone call, to be more aggressive.  And I was like, “Okay.”  You know, “Yes, sir, Mr. President.  We will indeed do that.”  The president is the commander in chief.  I — I do what the president asks.

    So — and I said, “Can we send out an email to everyone, just saying, ‘What did you get done last week?’”  The president said yes.  So, I — I did that. 

    And, you know, we — we got a partial response.  But we — we’re going to send another email.  But we — our — our goal is not to be capricious or — or unfair.  It’s — we want to give people every opportunity to send an email and the email could simply be “What I’m working on is too sensitive or classified to — to describe.”  Like, literally, just re- — that would be sufficient.  We’re — we’re — you know, I think this is just common sense. 

    Q    And what is your target number for — for how many workers, employees you’re looking to cut total?

    MR. MUSK:  We — we wish to keep everyone who is doing a job that is essential and doing that job well.  But if — if they’re — if the job is not essential or they’re not doing the job well, they obviously should not be on the public payroll. 

    (Cross-talk.)

    THE PRESIDENT:  No, I have to — I would like to add —

    (Cross-talk.)

    Wait a minute.  Wait.  Wait.  I’d like to add that those million people that haven’t responded, though, Elon, they are on the bubble.  You know, I wouldn’t say that we’re thrilled about it.  You know, they haven’t responded.  Now, maybe they don’t exist.  Maybe we’re paying people that don’t exist.

    Don’t forget, we just got here.  This group just got here.  But those people are on the bubble, as they say.  You know, maybe they’re going to be gone.  Maybe they’re not around.  Maybe they have other jobs.  Maybe they moved and they’re not where they’re supposed to be.  A lot of things could have happened.

    I wouldn’t say that Biden ran a very tight administration.  They spent money like nobody has ever spent money before, wasted money — the Green New Scam, all of the different things they spent money on. 

    And you’ve seen that.  You’ve seen that with some of the things that I read in speeches.  I read them, and people can’t believe, when I read them, $20 million here, $30 million here for, you know, a little educational course on something.  Circumcision, right?  Circumcision.  $20 million to inform the people of such-and-such a country on other things and other things other than that.

    So, yeah, those people are — right now, we’re trying to find out who those people are that haven’t responded.  Now, there’ll be some agencies — like Marco has people within State that are right now doing very classified, very confidential work.  And we understand that, and we’ve talked.  And, you know, we’re being a little more surgical. 

    And Marco is doing a lot of things himself.  He’s — and some of the secretaries are.  We’re going to be going to them.  We’re going to be talking about it today.  We’re going to ask them to do their own DOGE.  In other words, they’ll look in their group and who —

    I spoke with Lee Zeldin, and he thinks he’s going to be cutting 65 or so percent of the people from Environmental, and we’re going to speed up the process, too, at the same time.  He had a lot of people that weren’t doing their job — they were just obstructionists — and a lot of people that didn’t exist, I guess, Lee, too.  You found a lot of empty spots that the people weren’t there.  They didn’t exist.

    And I think Education is going to be one of those.  You go around Washington, you see all these buildings — the Department of Education.  We want to move education back to the states, where it belongs.  Iowa should have education.  Indiana should run their own education.  You’re going to see education go way up.

    Right now, we’re ranked at the very bottom of the list, but we’re at the top of the list in one thing: the cost per pupil.  We spend more money per pupil than any other country in the world, and yet it’s Denmark and Norway, Sweden.  And I — you hate to say this — and, you know, we’re going to get along very well with China, but it’s a competitor: They’re at the top of the list.  They’re among the top 10, usually.  And they’re a very big country, so we can’t use that as an excuse — right? — because we’re a very big country too.

    But we’re – we were ranked last time — under Biden, we were ranked 40 out of 40.  They do the 40 certain nations that they’ve done for a long time.  It seems to be 40, for whatever reason.  And we were ranked number 40.  A year ago, we were 38.  Then we were 39.  We’re — we hit 40.  And so, we’re last in that, and we’re first in cost per pupil.  So, I would say that’s unacceptable.

    Lawrence, do you have something?  Go ahead.

    Q    So, Mr. President, I know you like competition, and I know it’s early.  So, which department are you most impressed with? 

    And then, to Mr. Mu- — (laughter).  That’s the first one.  And, Mr. Musk, which department have you received the most resistance from? 

         Mr. President, you first.

    THE PRESIDENT:  Well, I think both of those questions are a little bit — well, you’re a pretty controversial guy.  (Laughter.)  Look, it’s very early.  Right now, I think I’m impressed with everybody.  So far, everybody.  If I wasn’t, in the first month, we’d — and some of them just got here.  They just got approved two days ago, right?

    But I think I’m very impressed with everybody.  So far, I’m very happy with all of the choices.

    I think that Elon has done incredibly with some groups.  And some groups are much easier than others.  It is true: State is a, you know, very difficult situation.  We’re right now negotiating very successfully, I think, with Russia and with Ukraine, and we have a lot of countries involved.  And we have to be a little bit careful what we do and who we’re terminating.  But Marco is doing that very — I think he’s going to be very precise.  It’s going to be —

    We’re cutting down government.  We’re cutting down the size of government.  We have to.  We’re bloated.  We’re sloppy.  We have a lot of people that aren’t doing their job.  We have a lot of people that don’t exist. 

         You look at Social Security as an example.  I mean, you have so many people in Social Security where, if you believe it, they’re 200 years old.  And what we’re doing is finding out: Are checks going out for that and is somebody cashing those checks who’s maybe 35 years old?  Okay? 

         So, there’s a lot of dishonesty.  There’s a lot of fraud. 

         But I think at this moment, I’ll take Elon off the spot.  I think that he’s impressed — he said it very well –better than I can say it — that he’s impressed with the people in this room.  Very impressed.  And I am too.  And it’s too early to say, but I think everybody is on board.  They all know — we want to balance a budget.  We want to have a balanced budget within a reasonably short period of time, meaning maybe by next year or the year after, but maybe — maybe even sooner than that. 

         Q    Mr. President, your — your number one issue was the border.  We just got new information that they’re doxing our federal agents.  They’re putting their personal information out there, these activists, and they’re disrupting the operations.  So, you got Tren de Aragua running all across the country —

         THE PRESIDENT:  Well, we have activists.  That’s true.  And a lot of those —

         Q    So, what are we going to do about the activists —

         THE PRESIDENT:  Yeah.  A lot of those activists are acting illegally.  And we’ll give that to our attorney general, and she’ll take a look at that very strongly.  But we’re also having tremendous support from Border Patrol, from ICE.  The ICE agents have been unbelievable.  Border Patrol — their leadership at Border Patrol has been incredible, and they’re working very well. 

         And, as you know — and I saw you reporting it this morning, actually — we set records on the least number of illegal aliens coming in, migrants coming into our country that we’ve had in more than 50 years.  And we did this all within a period of weeks, because we took over a mess.  The world was pouring in.  And remember, they were coming in from jails and prisons and mental institutions and insane asylums, and they were gang members and drug dealers.  Anybody who wanted to come in, they came.  And from not just South America, from all over the world.  So, it’s amazing what they’ve done. 

         And Kristi and — and Tom Homan, the job they’ve done has been absolutely amazing.  We set records for — and we want people to come into our country, by the way, but they want to come in — they have to come in legally. 

         I want that to be really understood.  We want people in our country, but they have to come in legally. 

         Q    Can I follow on that, Mr. President?

    Q    Mr. President.

    Q    About the — the Trump gold card idea —

         THE PRESIDENT:  Yeah.

         Q    — that you unveiled yesterday.

         THE PRESIDENT:  I hope you liked it.  (Laughter.)

         Q    I await more information.  But the question is: Does this reflect a view, on your part, that the American immigration system has never been properly monetized as you feel it should be?
        

         THE PRESIDENT:  Well, not so much monetized.  It hasn’t been properly run.  I get calls from, as an example, companies where they want to hire the number one student at a school.  A person comes from India, China, Japan, lots of different places, and they go to Harvard, the Wharton School of Finance.  They go to Yale.  They go to all great schools.  And they graduate number one in their class, and they are made job offers, but the offer is immediately rescinded because you have no idea whether or not that person can stay in the country.  I want to be able to have that person stay in the country. 

         These companies can go and buy a gold card, and they can use it as a matter of recruitment. 

         At the same time, the company is using that money to pay down debt.  We’re going to — we’re going to pay down a lot of debt with that.

         Q    Are they going to have to —

         THE PRESIDENT:  And I think the gold card is going to be used by — not only for that.  I mean, they’ll be used by companies.  I mean, I could see Apple — I’ve spoken with Tim Cook — and, by the way, he’s going to make a $500 billion investment in the country only because of the results of the election and, I think, because of tariffs.  He’s going to want to be in the country because of tariffs.  Because if you’re in the country, there is no tariff.  If you’re out of the country, you got to pay tariffs.  And that’s going to be a great investment, I think, that he’s making.  I know it’s going to be a great investment. 

         But we have to be able to get people in the country, and we want people that are productive people.  And I will tell you, the people that can pay $5 million, they’re going to create jobs.  They’re going to spend a lot of money on jobs.  They’re going to have to pay taxes on that too.  So, they’re going to be hiring people, they’re going to be bringing people in and companies in.  And, I don’t know, maybe it will sell like crazy.  I happen to think it’s going to sell like crazy.  It’s a bargain.

         But we’ll —

         Q    Will they have to commit to a certain number?

         THE PRESIDENT:  — know fairly soon.  I think Howard and — and Scott — a few of you, really, are responsible for it.  But, Howard, if you want to discuss that for a couple of minutes, I think I’d like to have you.  I think it’s going to be a very successful program.

         SECRETARY LUTNICK:  Sure.

         THE PRESIDENT:  This is Commerce.

         SECRETARY LUTNICK:  So, the EB-5 program, which has been around for many years, had investment of a million dollars into projects in America.  And those projects were often suspect, they didn’t really work out, there wasn’t any oversight of it.  And so, for a million-dollar investment, you got a visa, and then you came into the country and ended up with a green card. 

         So, it was poorly overseen, poorly executed.  Then you had our border open, where millions of people came through. 

         So, the idea is we will have a proper business.  We will modify the EB-5 agreement.  Kristi and I are working on it together.  For $5 million, they’ll get a license from the Department of Commerce.  Then they’ll make a proper investment on the EB-5, right?  And we think Scott and I will design the EB-5 investment model, because Scott and I are the best people together to do that.  So, this is joint. 

         This is exactly the Trump administration.  We all work together.  We work it out to be the best.  And if we sell — just remember — 200,000 — there’s a line for EB-5 of 250,000 right now — 200,000 of these gold green cards is $1 trillion

    to pay down our debt, and that’s why the president is doing it, because we are going to balance this budget, and we are going to pay off the debt under President Trump. 

         Q    Mr. —

    Q    And to qualify, do you have to promise and make commitments to create a certain number of jobs here in the U.S.?

         THE PRESIDENT:  No.  No.  Because not all these people are going to be job builders.  They’ll be successful people, or they’ll be people that were hired from colleges, like — sort of like paying an athlete a bonus.  I mean, Apple or one of the companies will go out and they’ll spend five mil- — they’ll buy five of them, and they’re going to get five people. 

         Look, I’ve had the complaint where — I’ve had the complaint from a lot of companies where they go out to hire people, and they can’t hire them b- — out of colleges.  And you know what they do?  They go back to India, or they go back to the country where they came, and they open up a company, and they become billionaires.  They become — and they’re employing thousands and there are a lot of examples. 

    There are some really big examples where they were forced out of the country.  They graduated top in their class at a great school, and they weren’t able to stay.  This is all the time you hear it. 

    And the biggest complaint I get from companies, other than overregulation, which we took care of, but we’re going to have to take care of it here, because a lot of that was put back on by Biden.  But the biggest complaint is the fact that they can’t have any longevity with people.  This way, they have pretty much unlimited longevity. 

    Also, with the $5 million, you know, that’s a path to citizenship.  So, that’s going to be — it’s sort of a green card-plus, and it’s a path to citizenship.  We’re going to call it the gold card.  And I think it’s going to be very treasured.  I think it’s going to do very well.  And we’re going to start selling, hopefully, in about two weeks.

    Now, just so you understand, if we sell a million — right? — a million, that’s $5 trillion.  Five trillion.  Howard was using a different number, but that’s $5 trillion.  If we sell 10 million, which is possible — 10 million highly productive people coming in or people that we’re going to make productive — they’ll be young, but they’re talented, like a talented athlete — that’s $50 trillion. 

    That means our debt is totally paid off, and we have $15 trillion above that.  And — now, I don’t know that we’re going to sell that many.  Maybe we won’t so many at all.  But I think we’re going to sell a lot, because I think there’s — there really is a thirst. 

    No other country can do this, because people don’t want to go to other countries.  They want to come here.  Everybody wants to come here, especially since November 5th.  (Laughter.)

    (Cross-talk.)

    SECRETARY LUTNICK:  They’ll all be vetted, by the way.  All these people will be vetted. 

    Q    How?

    SECRETARY LUTNICK:  Okay?  They’ll be vetted.

    Q    Mr. President, on Ukraine.  Can you talk a lot — a little bit about what type of security guarantees you’re willing to make?

    THE PRESIDENT:  Well, I’m not going to make security guarantees beyond very much.  We’re going to have Europe do that, because it’s in — you know, we’re talking about Europe is their next-door neighbor.  But we’re going to make sure everything goes well. 

    And as you know, we’ll be making a — we’ll be really partnering with Ukraine in terms of rare earth.  We very much need rare earth.  They have great rare earth.  We’ll be working with Secretary Burgum and with Chris.  You’ll be working on that together. 

    And we’re going to be able to have tremendous — I mean, this gives us — because we don’t have that much of it here.  We have some, but we don’t have that much, and we need a lot more to really propel us to the next level of — to lead in every way.  We’re leading right now with AI.  We’re leading with everything right now, but we have to — we need resources. 

    We have to double our electric capacity.  We have to do many things.  We have to really triple, if you think of it, the electric capacity from what we have right now, if you can believe it.  (Laughter.) 

    Q    But will the United States — can I —

    THE PRESIDENT:  So, I just say this.  So, the deal we’re making gets us — it brings us great wealth.  We get back the money that we spent, and we hope that we’re going to be able to settle this up. 

    We want to settle it.  We want to stop — I tell you what.  I’m doing it for two reasons, but the number one reason, by far, is to watch — all these people being killed.  I see pictures every week from — I assume satellite pictures, mostly, but there’s some pictures on site of thousands of soldiers that are being killed.  They’re being decimated, because equipment today — military equipment is so powerful and so devastating.  And, number one, I want to see people stop. 

    And they’re not from here.  They’re from primarily two other countries. 

    And then, by the way, let’s talk about the Middle East.  We got to solve that problem too.  And that’s come a long way.  We’re doing very well in that also.  A lot of things are happening on that.  But I’m watching soldiers being killed — Ukrainian and Russian soldiers being killed.  My number one thing is to get that stopped. 

    My number two thing is I don’t want to have to pay any more money, because we’ve — Biden has spent $350 billion without any chance of getting it back.  Now we’re going to be getting all of that money back, plus a lot more.  And we provided a great thing.  I mean, we’ve provided something very important, and we’ll be working with Ukraine and — because we’ll be taking that — we’re going to be taking what we’re entitled to take. 

    Now, they spent $350 billion, and Europe spent $100 billion.  Now, does anybody really think that’s fair?  But then we find out, a little while ago — not so long ago, a few months ago, I found out that the money they spent, they get back, but the money we spent, we don’t get back.  I said, “Well, we’re going to get it back.” 

    And we’ll be able to make a deal.  And again, President Zelenskyy is coming to sign the deal.  And it’s a great thing.  It’s a great deal for Ukraine, too, because they get us over there, and we’re going to be working over there.  We’ll be on the land.  And, you know, in that way, it’s — there’s sort of automatic security, because nobody’s going to be messing around with our people when we’re there.  And so, we’ll be there in that way. 

    But Europe will be watching it very closely.  I know that UK has said and France has said that they want to put — they volunteered to put so-called peacekeepers on the site.  And I think that’s a good thing.

    (Cross-talk.)

    Q    Mr. President, you had mentioned the high cost of eggs, and we’ve seen consumer confidence this week have a sharp drop from last month — the biggest dip in, I believe, three years.  Why is that — your assessment, why is that the case and is there anything you can do? 

    THE PRESIDENT:  Well, I think that consumer confidence — if you look at confidence in the nation, it had the biggest increase in the history of the chart.  It went up 42 points in a period of, like, days after the election, since the election.  So, since the election, the confidence in our nation — including right track, wrong track — the first time it’s ever happened, where we were on the right track, because this country has been on the wrong track for a long time. 

    So, the confidence in business, confidence in the country has reached an all-time high.  We have never reached levels like we are right now.

    Okay.

    (Cross-talk.)

    Q    Mr. President, you said — Mr. President, you’ve been very clear in saying that as long as you’re president, Iran will never get a nuclear weapon. 

    THE PRESIDENT:  That’s true. 

    Q    Is it also your policy that as long as you’re president, China will never take Taiwan by force?

    THE PRESIDENT:  I never comment on that.  I don’t comment on any — because I don’t want to ever put myself in that position.  And if I said it, I certainly wouldn’t be saying it to you.  I’d be saying it to other people, maybe people around this table — (laughter) — and very specific people around this table.  

    Q    Is it a concern (inaudible)?

    THE PRESIDENT:  So, I don’t want to put myself in that position.  But I can tell you what, I have a great relationship with President Xi.  I’ve had a great relationship with him.  We want them to come in and invest. 

    I see so many things saying that we don’t want China in this country.  That’s not right.  We want them to invest in the United States.  That’s good.  That’s a lot of money coming in.  And we’ll invest in China.  We’ll do things with China. 

    The relationship we’ll have with China would be a very good one.  I see all of these phony reports that we don’t want their money; we don’t want anything to do with them.  That’s wrong. 

    We’re going to have a good relationship with China, but they won’t be able to take advantage of us.  What they did to Biden was — he didn’t know what was happening.  He didn’t know what he was doing.  The administration didn’t know what they were doing.  It was very sad to watch. 

         But we’re going to have a good relationship with China and Russia and Ukraine and the Middle East.  We’re doing things that —

    Look, when I left, we had no wars.  We had defeated ISIS totally.  We had no inflation.  We didn’t have the Afghanistan withdrawal — the worst withdrawal anybody has ever seen.  I think that’s one of the reasons that President Putin looked at that.  He said, “Wow, these guys are a paper tiger.  Look at” — we’re no paper tiger. 

    Don’t forget: We got rid of ISIS in three weeks.  People said it would take five years.  We did it, because when I came in, I let them do what they had to do.  And the man that headed that operation is now going to be your — your chairman, right?

    SECRETARY HEGSETH:  Yes, sir.

    THE PRESIDENT:  Chairman of the Joint Chiefs. 

    SECRETARY HEGSETH:  Yes, sir.

    THE PRESIDENT:  And — “Razin” Caine.  I liked him right from the beginning.  As soon as I heard his name, I said, “That’s my guy.” 

    Okay.  Any other questions?

    (Cross-talk.)

    Q    Mr. President, has there been enough de- — decreases in crossings at the border for you to continue the pause on tariffs against Mexico and Canada?  And, if not —

    THE PRESIDENT:  No, no.  I’m going to — I’m not stopping the tariffs, no.  Millions of people have died because of the fentanyl that comes over the border. 

    Q    Even with the 90 percent drop in border crossings, though, this —

    THE PRESIDENT:  Well, that’s — well —

    Q    — last month compared to about a year ago?

    THE PRESIDENT:  Yeah, they’ve been good, but that’s also due to us.  Mostly due to us.  I mean —

    Q    Mr. President —

         Q    Mr. President, on CBS — 

    THE PRESIDENT:  — it’s very hard.  It’s, right now, very hard to come through the border.  But the — look, the damage has been done.  We’ve lost millions of people due to fentanyl.  It comes mostly from China, but it comes through Mexico, and it comes through Canada. 

    Q    Mr. Presi- —

    THE PRESIDENT:  And I have to tell you that, you know, on April 2nd — I was going to do it on April 1st, but I’m a little bit superstitious, so I made it April 2nd — the tariffs go on, not all of them but a lot of them.  And I think you’re going to see something that’s going to be amazing. 

    We’ve been taken advantage of as a country for a long period of time.  We’ve been — we’ve been tariffed, but we didn’t tariff.  Now, I did.  When I was here, I tariffed.  We took in $700 billion from China — $700 billion.  Not one president in this — in the history of our country took in 10 cents from China.  At the same time, China respected us. 

    Now, when COVID came in, that was a different deal.  I used to call it the China virus.  I guess I can call it the China virus again, but, you know, it was — it’s an accurate term, but I won’t do that out of respect to China.  Okay?

    (Cross-talk.)

    Say it again.  What?

    Q    On Gaza.  I just wondered if there’s any progress towards the second phase of the ceasefire that you can tell us about.

    THE PRESIDENT:  Well, I’m very disappointed when I see four — four bodies came in today.  These are young people.  Young people don’t die.  Okay?  Young people don’t die.  These are young people.  Four bodies came in today.  They think they’re doing us a favor by sending us bodies. 

    So, look, that’s a decision that has to be made by Israel, by Bibi, but Israel has to make that decision.  We got a lot of hostages back, but it’s very sad what happened to those people.  I mean, you had a young lady with her hand practically blown off.  You know why it blew up?  Because she put up her hand to try and stop a bullet that was coming her way, and it hit her hand and blew off her fingers, big part of her hand. 

    This is a vicious group of people, and Israel is going to have to decide what they’re doing.  Phase one is going to be ending.  Think of it: Today, they sent in four bodies.  Bodies. 

    And I will say one thing, though.  I’ve spoken to a lot of the parents and a lot of the people involved.  They want those bodies almost as much and maybe even just as much as they wanted their son or their daughter.  Amazing.  “Please, sir.  Please.  My son is dead, but they have his body.  Please can you get it for us?”  They — it’s the biggest thing.  It’s incredible the level — they want the bodies of these people.  They’re dead.  They’re dead. 

    And, you know, when I saw the ones that came in two weeks ago, they looked like they just got out of a concentration camp.  Then, the following week, a group came in, and they weren’t as bad — in as bad of shape.

    But Israel is going to have to make a decision.  You’re right, phase one, and now phase two has started.  And today, we got some, you know, very, very sad — we knew they were dead, by the way.  We knew they were going to be bodies, as opposed to people that were living.  But it’s a very sad situation. 

    At some point, somebody is going to say we got to do something about this.

    (Cross-talk.)

    Q    Mr. President, you were just talking about Afghanistan and the botched withdrawal.  Have all the generals or command staff that were involved with the withdrawal been fired or relieved of duty?

    THE PRESIDENT:  Well, that’s a great idea.  It’s — (laughter) — sorry, I’m not going to tell this man what to do, but I will say that.  If I had his place, I’d fire every single one of them, Pete.  Pete, that’s a very good question. 

    SECRETARY HEGSETH:  Well, it’s a question we’ve thought a lot about.  We’re doing a complete review of every single aspect of what happened with the botched withdrawal of Afghanistan and plan to have full accountability.  It’s one of the first things we announced at the Defense Department for that reason, sir. 

    Certainly General “Razin” Caine, who’s on his way in, was not a part of that.  Instead, was a part of leading the effort against ISIS by untying the hands of war fighters and finishing the job properly and then bringing our troops home. 

    So, we’re taking a very different view, obviously, than the previous administration, and there will be full accountability. 

    THE PRESIDENT:  I don’t see big promotions in that group.  (Laughter.)  And I think they’re going to be largely gone.  I know the man on my left.  I think they’re going to be largely gone. 

    That was a horrible display.  And, you know, I’ve dealt with the parents and the family of the 13 that were killed.  But, you know, nobody ever talks about the 40 that were so badly hurt, with the arms and the legs and the face and the whole thing — the missing arms and legs.  It was so terrible, the way that was handled.

    And it should have been gone through Bagram.  We have a big base with big fences that nobody can get in, and you have, you know, hundreds of acres, instead of a little local airport where the whole place went crazy.  That was so badly handled.  And I would think that most of those people are going to be gone. 

    Q    Are we going to take Bagram back?

    THE PRESIDENT:  So, I’ll tell you what has bothered me very much — very, very much: We give billions of dollars to Afghanistan.  Nobody knows that.  Nobody knew that.  Do you know we give billions of dollars to Afghanistan?  And yet we left behind all of that equipment, which wouldn’t have happened. 

    You know, we were getting out under me.  I’m the one that got it down to 5,000 people.  We were going to get out, but we were going to keep Bagram, not because of Afghanistan but because of China, because it’s exactly one hour away from where China makes its nuclear missiles. 

    So, we were going to keep Bagram.  We were going to keep a small force on Bagram.  We were going to have Bagram Air Base, one of the biggest air bases in the world.  One of the biggest runways, one of the most powerful runways, in the sense that it was very heavy concrete and steel.  You could carry about anything.  You could land anything on those runways. 

    We gave it up.  And you know who’s occupying it right now?  China.  China.  Biden gave it up.  So, we’re going to keep that, and we’re going to have a withdrawal, and we’re going to take our equipment.  We’re going to do it properly.  We’re going to do it very — we’re going to keep the equipment. 

         Well, they ran out.  It was — what happened there was a — in fact, you know, in all fairness to Putin, when he saw that, he said, “Well, this is our time to go and go into Ukraine,” I guess, because it was — the timing seemed to be about right. 

         But we send them billions of dollars in aid, which nobody knows.  If they — if the American public knew that — they know it now.  And if we’re doing that, I think they should give our equipment back.  And I told Pete to study that. 

    But we left billions — tens of billions of dollars’ worth of equipment behind.  Brand-new trucks.  You see them display it every year on their little roadway someplace where they have a road and they drive the — you know, waving the flag and talking about America.  Beautiful equipment that’s all — I mean, the top-of-the-line stuff, brand-new stuff.  Now it’s getting older. 

         But you know what?  We’re going to pay them.  I think we should get a lot of that equipment back. 

         You know that Afghanistan is one of the biggest sellers of military equipment in the world.  You know why?  They’re selling the equipment that we left.  We’re first.  They were second or third.  Can you believe it?  They’re selling 777,000

    rifles, 70,000 armor-plated — many of them were armor-plated trucks and vehicles — 70,000. 

         If you think of a used car lot, the biggest one in the country, you have — I would say, JD, if somebody had 500 cars, that would be a lot. 

    THE VICE PRESIDENT:  Yeah, that would be quite a lot.

    THE PRESIDENT:  This is 70,000 vehicles we had there, and we left it for them.  I think we should get it back.

         (Cross-talk.)

         Q    Mr. President, the spending bill that passed last night aims to cut $2 trillion.

         THE PRESIDENT:  Right.

         Q    Can you guarantee that Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security will not be touched?

         THE PRESIDENT:  Yeah.  I mean, I have said it so many times, you shouldn’t be asking me that question.  Okay?  This will not be “read my lips.”  It won’t be “read my lips” anymore: We’re not going to touch it.

         Now, we are going to look for fraud.  I’m sure you’re okay with that, like people that shouldn’t be on, people that are illegal aliens and others — criminals, in many cases.  And that’s with Social Security.  We have a lot of people — you see that immediately.  When you see people that are 200 years old that are being sent checks for Social Security — some of them are actually being sent checks. 

    So, we’re tracing that down, and I have a feeling that Pam is going to do a very good job with that.  But you have a lot of fraud. 

         But, no, I’m not — we’re not doing anything on that.

         Q    Mr. President, part of your mission, sir —

         Q    Mr. President — Mr. President, on CBS News.  Mr. President, you’re in litigation —
        
         Q    Part of your mission has been — thank you.  I’m sorry. 

         Part of your mission has been to restore executive control over the executive branch.  Is it your view of your authority that you have the power to call up any one of or all of the people seated at this table and issue orders that they’re bound to follow?

         THE PRESIDENT:  Oh, yeah.  They’ll follow the orders.  Yes, they will. 

         Q    No exceptions? 

         THE PRESIDENT:  No except- — well, let’s see.  Let me think.  Oh, yeah.  Yeah.  She’ll have an exception.  (The president points at Secretary Rollins.)  (Laughter.)

         Of course, no exceptions.  You know that.

         Q    Mr. President, can you clarify the Canada/Mexico tariffs.  You had put that 30-day pause. 

    THE PRESIDENT:  Yeah.

    Q    You just referred to —

         THE PRESIDENT:  It’s 25 percent.

         Q    Twenty-five percent.  When does it go into effect?

         THE PRESIDENT:  April 2nd. 

         Q    April 2nd for Canada and Mexico?

         THE PRESIDENT:  Correct.  And for —

         Q    And for the reciprocal?

         THE PRESIDENT:  — and for everything. 

         SECRETARY LUTNICK:  Well, we have the — the — fentanyl-related is a pause.  If they can prove to the president they’ve done an excellent job, that’s what they first do in 30 days.

         Q    Have you guys seen any changes?

         SECRETARY LUTNICK:  But then the overall is April 2nd.  So, the big transaction is April 2nd, but the fentanyl-related things, if they’re working hard on the border, at the end of that 30 days, they have to prove to the president that they’ve satisfied him to that regard.  If they have —

         THE PRESIDENT:  It’s going to be hard to satisfy.

         SECRETARY LUTNICK:  — then we’ll give them a pause or he won’t. 

         THE PRESIDENT:  It’s going to be hard to satisfy.

         SECRETARY LUTNICK:  But that’s up to him to see.

         THE PRESIDENT:  We lose 300,000 people a year to fentanyl.  Not 100-, not 95-, not 60-, like you read.  You know, you’ve been reading it for years. 

         We lost, in my opinion, over the last couple of years, on average, maybe close to 300,000 people dead, and the families are ruined.  You know, when they lose a daughter, when they lose a son, the families are never the same.  You’re never going to be the same.  So, you’re talking about a million people. 

         But when the daughters die, I see it — daughters die and the sons die because of fentanyl.  And in some cases, they don’t even know they’re taking it.  They — they’re buying something else, and it’s laced with fentanyl, and they end up dying.  And I’ve known many people who have lost children to fentanyl and for other reasons, but to fentanyl.  It’s such a big killer.  And those people are never the same people. 
        
         I mean, I’ve seen people that — for the rest of their lives, they’re not the same people.  They’re so different, it’s not even believable.  Dynamic people, happy people that are — they die a miserable death.  And that’s because of the crap that comes in through China and through Mexico and through Canada.  A lot of it comes through Canada. 

         The — Canada — look, we support Canada $200 billion a year in subsidies one way or the other.  We let them make millions of cars.  We let them send us lumber.  We don’t need their lumber.  We’re going to free up our lumber.  Lee is going to do — the head of environmental.  We’re going to free up our lumber.  We have the best lumber there is.  We don’t need their lumber.  What do we need their lumber for?

         When you look at the — we subsidize them $200 billion a year.  Without us, Canada can’t make it.  You know, Canada relies on us 95 percent.  We rely on them 4 percent.  Big difference.  And I say Canada should be our 51st state.  There’s no tariffs, no nothing. 
        
         And — and I say that, we give them military protection.  They have a very small military.  They spend very little money on military.  Or NATO, they’re just about last in terms of payment, because they say, “Why should we spend on military?”  That’s a tremendous cost.  Most nations can’t afford to even think about it.  “Why should we spend on military?  The United States protects us.” 

         And I would say that’s largely true.  We protect Canada.  But it’s not fair.  It’s not fair that they’re not paying their way.  And if they had to pay their way, they couldn’t exist. 

         When I spoke to — let’s call it the prime minister, rather than the governor.  (Laughter.)  But when I spoke to him, I said, “Why are we giving you $200 billion a year?”  He was unable to answer the question.  I said, “Why are we letting you make millions of cars and send them in?”  He was unable to answer the question — Justin Trudeau, a nice guy.  I think he’s a very good guy.  I call him Governor Trudeau. 

         He should be governor, because the fact is that if we don’t give them cars — we don’t have to give them cars.  The c- — tariffs will make it impossible for them to sell cars into the United States.  The tariffs will make it impossible to — for them to sell lumber or anything else into the United States. 

    And all I’m asking to do is break even or lose a little bit, but not lose $200 million.  And we love Canada.  I love Canada.  I love the people of Canada.  And — but, honestly, it’s not fair for us to be supporting Canada.  And if we don’t support them, they don’t subsist as a — as a nation. 

    Okay.

    Q    Mr. President, when you were talking to Elon —

    Q    Mr. President, on the EU tariffs.  Mr. President, have you made a decision on what level you will seek on tariffs on the European Union?

    THE PRESIDENT:  We have made a decision, and we’ll be announcing it very soon.  And it’ll be 25 percent, generally speaking, and that’ll be on cars and all other things. 

    And European Union is a different case than Canada — different kind of case.  They’ve really taken advantage of us in a different way.  They don’t accept our cars.  They don’t accept, essentially, our farm products.  They use all sorts of reasons why not.  And we accept everything of them, and we have about a $300 billion deficit with the European Union. 

    Now, I love the countries of Europe.  I guess I’m from there at some point, a long time ago, right?  (Laughter.)  But indirectly — well, pretty directly, too, I guess.  But I love the countries of Europe.  I — I love all countries, frankly.  All different.

    But European Union has been — it was formed in order to screw the United States.  I mean, look, let’s be honest.  The European Union was formed in order to screw the United States.  That’s the purpose of it, and they’ve done a good job of it, but now I’m president.

    Q    What will happen if these countries or the EU retaliate?

    THE PRESIDENT:  They can’t.  I mean, they can try, but they can’t. 

    Q    China did.  They imposed tariffs —

    Q    They are pledging to, sir.

    Q    — that are — went into effect, China’s retaliatory tariffs —

    THE PRESIDENT:  That’s right.  That’s right.  But —

    Q    — on the — the 10th of February.  Has there been any —

    THE PRESIDENT:  That’s right.

    Q    — impact that you’ve been able to observe?

    THE PRESIDENT:  That’s right.  No, they can do it, and they can try, but the numbers can never equal what ours, because we can go off.  We are the pot of gold.  We’re the one that everybody wants.  And they can retaliate, but it cannot be a successful retaliation, because we just go cold turkey.  We don’t buy anymore.  And if that happens, we win. 

    Q    Are you talking to Erik Prince about privatat- —

    THE PRESIDENT:  No.

    Q    — privatizing deportations?

    THE PRESIDENT:  No, I haven’t.  I haven’t.

    Q    Mr. President, you’re in litigation with CBS News.  Is this a case that you’d like to see go to trial, or are you open a settelm- —

    THE PRESIDENT:  With who?

    Q    CBS, the — “60 Minutes.”

    THE PRESIDENT:  CBS?

    Q    Yes.

    THE PRESIDENT:  Well, CBS did something that was amazing.  Kamala was unable to answer a question properly, and they took the question that they asked, and they inserted an answer.  They gave her an answer.  This was two days before the election, right before — the Sunday night before the election.  And they wrote out a — they put her words from another question that was asked about a half an hour later, and they put that into the question. 

    Nobody’s ever even heard of it before.  Nobody’s ever heard of anything like this before.  But they then did it, they say, on numerous occasions.  And the FCC is looking at it very strongly, and everybody’s looking at it, and I’m — but nobody’s ever seen anything. 

    Think of it.  They took her answers, and they changed them.  And I don’t mean they changed a word or two, or they cut off a half a sentence, or they cut off a couple of words.  I mean, I’ve had that happen too.  But that, you — you just say — you know, then they say, “Well, we want brevity.  You know, we wanted to do it for time.” 

    Q    Would — would you encourage —

    THE PRESIDENT:  They took out her answer, and they inserted an entirely different answer that made her sound competent.  And they did this, and nobody’s ever — I thought I’ve heard of everything when it comes to that stuff.  No — I’ve never heard of it.  Nobody has ever seen.  So, we sued, and we are in discussions of settlement. 

    Q    What would a number be?  Like a hu- — what — what’s a number that you would think would be appropriate?

    THE PRESIDENT:  I think it’s a lot.  (Laughter.) 

    Q    What’s the timeline and process —

    THE PRESIDENT:  No, I mean, it — look, it could have — it probably did affect the election.  I mean, we won by a lot.  As I said, “Too big to rig.”  But it probably did affect the election.  Yeah, probably could have won by more, but I could have lost the election because of that. 

    It’s — we have to get to honest elections.  We have to go back to paper ballots.  We have to go back to voter ID.  One-day election, ideally, or short term, not these 48-day and 61-day elections where boxes are put in a room, and, “Oh, let’s move the boxes, because we’re putting in a new air conditioning system.”  Then you see the boxes move, and then you say, “Well, where are all the boxes?”  You know, —

    Q    But would you —

    THE PRESIDENT:  “What happened to the boxes that never came back?” 

    No, our elections are extremely dishonest.  We’re the only country in the world that has mail-in voting and all of these different things that we put in.  Nobody — no other country in the world has it. 

    You know, France went to — they had some of the things that we had, and they went to same-day voting, all paper.  And, you know, paper is very sophisticated now.  It’s a very sophisticated — it’s a very sophisticated form of voting right now.  It’s a very safe form of voting. 

    You know, the other thing is for the governors.  I wish the governors would do it, because the paper ballots will cost 9 percent of the machines, and they’re 100 percent.  You know, they’re — I don’t — nothing’s foolproof, but they’re as close as you get.  So, we’ll see what happens. 

    But on the “60 Minute” thing, nobody’s ever seen anything like it. 

    Q    And would you link the FCC action to the litigation?  I mean, does it make se- —

    THE PRESIDENT:  I don’t think it’s linked, but probably the lawyers look at it, you know, because I know it’s going along.  FCC is headed by a very competent person, and you have some very competent people on the board, and so I think they’re looking at it very seriously. 

    Yeah.

    Q    Mr. President —

    Q    Sir, of all the deals that you’ve done in your life, all the people you’ve sat across from and negotiated with, is President Putin distinct in any way?

    THE PRESIDENT:  He’s a very smart guy.  He’s a very cunning person.  But I’ve dealt with some people that — I’ve dealt with some really bad people.  But I will tell you, as far as this is concerned, we’ve — you have to understand, he was — he had no intention, in my opinion, of settling this war.  I think he wanted the whole thing. 

    When I got elected, we spoke, and I think we’re going to have a deal.  I can’t guarantee you that.  You know, a deal is a deal.  Lots of crazy things happen in deals, right?  But I think we’re going to have a deal. 

    If I didn’t get elected, I believe he would have just continued to go through Ukraine, and over a period of time, a lot of people — a lot of people would have been killed.  It would have lasted for a period of time. 

    And the reason that Ukraine — and I give — I have great respect for the Ukraine as fighters.  They have great fighters.  But without our equipment, that war would have been over, like people said, in a very short period of time. 

    Q    Is there a timeline (inaudible) — 

    THE PRESIDENT:  And if you remember, I gave the Javelins, and the Javelins are the things that knocked out those tanks right at the beginning of the war.  They said that — that Obama, at the time, gave sheets, and Trump gave Javelins.  Well, I was the one that did that.  But I want to see it come to an end. 

    Q    Will he have to make concessions — President Putin?

    THE PRESIDENT:  Yeah, he will.  He will.  He’s going to have to.  And —

    Q    Can you preview that?

    THE PRESIDENT:  And I think — I believe that, because we got elected, that war will come to an end.  And I also believe, if we didn’t get elected, if this administration didn’t win the election by a lot, that that war would go on for a long time, and he would want to take the whole thing. 

    Q    What concessions?  What concessions?

    Q    On the — on the —

    THE PRESIDENT:  The big question I had is: Does he want to take the whole thing?  But the reason — and — and the Ukrainians are good fighters, I have to say, but without the equipment — without our equipment — we have the best equipment in the world.  We have the best military equipment in the world.  Without our equipment, that would have been over very quickly. 

    Q    What concessions would you like to see? 

    Q    On the (inaudible), sir?  On — on the —

    Q    What concessions would you like to see?

    THE PRESIDENT:  Oh, I don’t want to tell right now.  But I can tell you that NATO, you can forget about.  That’s been — I think that’s probably the reason the whole thing started.  And I think, JD, we can say that. 

    What — do you have a statement on that?  You’ve been very much involved. 

    THE VICE PRESIDENT:  (Laughs.)

    THE PRESIDENT:  I gave him the beauty.

    THE VICE PRESIDENT:  Great.  You gave me the — the hardest question, sir. 

    Q    Concessions from Russia.

    THE VICE PRESIDENT:  I mean, look, as the president said, we’re not going to do the negotiation in public with the American media.  He’s going to do it in private with the president of — of Russia, with the president of Ukraine, and with other leaders.  And I think that’s how this has to go. 

    I think the — I just want to push back against some of the criticism I’ve seen in the administration on this, because every single time the president engages in diplomacy, you guys preemptively accuse him of conceding to Russia.  He hasn’t conceded anything to anyone.  He’s doing the job of a diplomat, and he is, of course, the diplomat in chief as the president of the United States. 

    Q    On the gold cards, sir.  Can you talk a little bit more about the vetting process, you know —

    THE PRESIDENT:  They’ll go through a process.  The process is being worked out right now, and we’re going to be — we’re going to be very careful. 

    Q    And will there be restrictions on, for instance, can Chinese nationals get one? 

    THE PRESIDENT:  No, we’re not going to restrict. 

    Q    Can Iranian nationals get —

    THE PRESIDENT:  We’re probably not going to be restricting too much in — in terms of countries, but maybe in terms of individuals.  We want to make sure we have people that love our country and are capable of loving the country.

    Q    Is there a process, sir —

    Q    Mr. President, there is a measles outbreak in Texas at the moment in which a child is reported to have died.  Do you have concerns about that?  And have you asked Secretary Kennedy to look into that outbreak? 

    THE PRESIDENT:  Well, why don’t we — Bobby, do you want to speak on that, please?

    SECRETARY KENNEDY:  We are following the measles epidemic every day.  I think there’s 124 people who have contracted measles at this point, mainly in Gaines County, Texas; mainly, we’re told, in the Mennonite community. 

    There are two people who have died, but the — we’re watching it.  And there — there are about 20 people hospitalized, mainly for quarantine. 

    We’re watching it.  We put out a post on it yesterday, and we’re going to continue to follow it. 

    Q    Mr. President —

    SECRETARY KENNEDY:  Inci- — incidentally, there have been four measles outbreaks this year in this country.  Last year, there were 16.  So, it’s not unusual.  We have measles outbreaks every year. 

    Q    You sound a little under the weather yourself right now.  Are you all right?

    SECRETARY KENNEDY:  I just — I have a permanently bad throat. 

    Q    (Inaudible) coughing.

    Q    Mr. President, would you — would you send U.S. peacekeepers to just — to support the — the European peacekeepers?  Would you do any sort of U.S. —

    THE PRESIDENT:  No, we’re going to support Europe, yeah. 

    Q    And how would we do that?  How would the United States do that?

    THE PRESIDENT:  We’re very friendly with Europe.  We have a great relationship with Europe.  I mean, you could ask — you could talk about France.  You could talk about any of them.  Yeah, we have a great relationship with Europe. 

    Q    But how will we — how will the United States do that?  Would there be boots on —

    THE PRESIDENT:  Well, how?  I mean, you’re asking me a question: What are we doing in the — let’s worry — I hope we have that problem, where we can worry about peacekeeping.  We got to get there first.

    (Secretary Lutnick knocks on the table.)

    But I hope we have the problem of worrying about peacekeeping.  That’ll be the easiest problem, I think, JD, that we’ve ever had.  (Laughter.)

    THE VICE PRESIDENT:  I think so, sir.

    Q    That would be part of the deal, presumably, that the Ukrainians —

    THE PRESIDENT:  We’ll — we’re —

    Q    — would want —

    THE PRESIDENT:  We’ll do it at the time, but we’ll — peacekeeping is very easy.  It’s making the deal that’s very tough. 

    And, again, nobody was speaking to Russia at all.  And, you know, probably a million and a half soldiers have been killed — close to a million and a half soldiers, not to mention a treme- — I will tell you, the — the thing with that horrible war that should have never started — it would have never started if I were president, and it didn’t start for four years, and it was not even thought about starting.  But the thing with that war is that you’re highly underestimating the number of people that have been killed.  Far more people have been killed in that war than you talk about.  You know, you like to talk about numbers, like, a million people.  Well, they had much more than a million soldiers killed.

    But you have a lot of cities that have been knocked to the ground.  They’re demolition sites.  Literally, demolition sites.  Every single building is knocked to the ground, and a lot of people were killed in those buildings.  And you’ll hear a report, “Two people were minorly injured” or “just injured a little bit.”  No.  No.  People were killed by the thousands.

    And there are a lot more people killed in that war than the media wants to talk about, because Biden did a horrible, horrible job.  He should have prevented that war.  He could have prevented that war. 

    Putin would have never gone in.  I’ll tell you one thing: He would have never gone in.  That war would never have taken place if I were president. 

    Q    I think what people are trying to understand, Mr. President —

    Q    Mr. President —

    Q    — is how would the United States — what would you be willing to do to support this European peacekeeping effort?  Would there be —

    THE PRESIDENT:  Again, you’re asking me the same question?  (Laughter.)

    Q    I’m just trying —

    THE PRESIDENT:  How many times do you have to answer it?  You’re talking about after we make peace.  Let me make peace first. 

    Once we make peace, I’ll give you all the answers you want.  But how many times can you ask the same question?

    Q    Mr. President, on the Middle East.  Did you receive —

    Q    Is loosening the sanctions on —

    THE PRESIDENT:  Yeah, go ahead.  Behind.

    Q    Is loosening the sanctions on Russia a potential option as part of an overall deal?

    THE PRESIDENT:  Not now, no.  No.  We have sanctions on Russia.  No, I want to see if we make a deal first.  But I think we will.  I’ve had very —

    Q    But is it a bargaining chip, I’m asking.

    THE PRESIDENT:  I’ve had very good conversations with President Putin.  I’ve had very good conversations with President Zelenskyy.  And until four weeks ago, nobody had conversations with anybody.  It wasn’t even a consideration.  Nobody thought you could make peace.  I think you can. 

    Q    Mr. President, just —

    Q    But if Mr. Putin gets to keep his —

    Q    — just to bring this —

    Q    — the land that was claimed by force, if the Russians get to keep the territory that they — they claimed by force, doesn’t that send a dangerous message, let’s say, to China about Taiwan?

    THE PRESIDENT:  Oh, okay.  You try and take it away, right?  We’re going to do the best we can.  (Laughter.)  We’re going to do the best we can to make the best deal we can for both sides.  But for Ukraine, we’re going to try very hard to make a good deal so that they can get as much back as possible.  We want to get as much back as possible. 

    Q    Mr. President, just to bring this full —

    THE PRESIDENT:  And we’ll — we’ll cut it out after maybe this question.  Go ahead.

    Q    To bring this full circle, back to —

    THE PRESIDENT:  Unless it’s a bad question, and then we’ll (inaudible).  (Laughter.)

    Q    And back to —

    THE PRESIDENT:  You always like to finish on a good one.

    THE VICE PRESIDENT:  But, sir, they want you to negotiate with them instead of President Putin.

    THE PRESIDENT:  I know.  I know.

    Q    Back to the question about the —

    THE PRESIDENT:  They want to continue to talk about the peacekeepers.  (Laughter.)  They’re — you have a lot of confidence in us, because you assume there’s going to be peace.  You know, it’s possible it doesn’t work out.  There is possibility. 

         Q    And I had —

         THE PRESIDENT:  But I hope it does, for the sake of humanity, because if you look at the pictures that I’ve looked at, you don’t want to look at them. 

         Go ahead.

         Q    I had a question back on these cuts to the federal workforce.  You mentioned you — you’re interested in doing another round of this email.  When would you like to

    see that?  What would be the deadline?  And —

         THE PRESIDENT:  I — I’m not — I think —

         Q    — this time, would it be mandatory?

         THE PRESIDENT:  I think Elon — I think Elon wants to.  And I think it’s a good idea because, you know, those people, as I said before, they’re on the bubble.  You got a lot of people that have not responded, so we’re trying to figure out, do they exist?  Who are they?  And it’s possible that a lot of those people will be actually fired. 

         Q    And —

         THE PRESIDENT:  And if that happened, that’s okay, because that’s what we’re trying to do. 

         This country has gotten bloated and fat and disgusting and incompetently run. 

         I think we had the worst president in the history of our country.  He just left office.  I think he’s a disgrace.  What he’s done to our country by allowing millions of people to come into our country like that and all of the other things — the inflation, which he caused because of energy and stupid spending.  To spend hundreds of millions, trillions and trillions of dollars on the Green New Scam — a total scam.  I have the best energy people, the best environmental people in the world around this table, and they — they can’t even believe he got away with it. 

         And then, in leaving office, to send $20 billion here and $20 million there and $10 million and $5 million, and they couldn’t spend the money fast enough, and “Let’s get it out before Trump gets in.  Let’s just get it out to anybody.”  This is a disgrace to our nation.

         And you don’t write the fair thing.  But, look, you know the good news?  The people see it, and that’s why we won the election by so much. 

         Thank you very much, everybody.  I appreciate it.  Thank you.  Thank you.   

         Q    Thank you, Mr. President.

         THE PRESIDENT:  Thank you very much, Doug.  Pulitzer Prize.

         THE VICE PRESIDENT:  Sir, how many peacekeepers are you going to send to — (laughter) —

         THE PRESIDENT:  “What will you do?”  “How will it be?”  (Laughter.)

         SECRETARY LUTNICK:  “How will you address this?”

                                    END            12:47 P.M. EST

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI: ThreeD Capital Inc. Releases Results for the Three and Six Months Ended December 31, 2024

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    TORONTO, Feb. 26, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — ThreeD Capital Inc. (“ThreeD” or the “Company”) (CSE:IDK / OTCQX:IDKFF) a Canadian-based venture capital firm focused on opportunistic investments in companies in the junior resources and disruptive technologies sectors, is pleased to announce its unaudited results as at and for the three and six months ended December 31, 2024.

    As at December 31, 2024, the Company had cash, investments and digital assets of $42.3 million.

    As at December 31, 2024, net asset value per share was $0.76 as compared to $0.86 as at June 30, 2024. (See “Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures” elsewhere)

    Financial Highlights for the three and six months ending December 31, 2024 with comparatives:

     Operating Results Three months ended
    December 31,
    Six months ended
    December 31,
        2024     2023     2024     2023  
     Net investment and digital assets gains (losses) $ (1,391,161 ) $ (4,251,307 ) $ (1,509,862 ) $ 3,374,507  
     Operating, general and administrative expenses   (953,520 )   (598,753 )   (1,996,968 )   (1,521,414 )
     Net income (loss) for the period   (2,216,578 )   (4,600,755 )   (3,315,158 )   2,193,938  
     Total comprehensive income (loss) for the period   (2,217,226 )   (4,600,361 )   (3,315,555 )   2,193,956  
     Basic income (loss) per common share   (0.04 )   (0.09 )   (0.06 )   0.04  
     Diluted income (loss) per common share   (0.04 )   (0.09 )   (0.06 )   0.04  
     Consolidated statement of financial position highlights December 31,
    2024
    June 30,
    2024
     Cash $ 49,110   $ 482,146  
     Investments, at fair value   39,833,331     51,577,705  
     Digital assets, at fair value less cost to sell   2,415,173     3,156,065  
     Total assets   43,875,042     56,174,715  
     Total liabilities   864,916     11,455,313  
     Share capital, contributed surplus, warrants   153,179,771     151,573,492  
     Foreign currency translation reserve   874,705     875,102  
     Deficit   (111,044,350 )   (107,729,192 )

    Sheldon Inwentash, Chairman and CEO, stated “We are optimistic that the digital assets and investments within ThreeD’s portfolio will generate future economic growth to the Company. As global markets continue to experience uncertainty, we see tremendous opportunities for innovation and sustainable growth as we continue to invest in emerging companies that align with our strategic vision.”

    Additionally, ThreeD announces that it will no longer be releasing its unaudited net asset value per share (“NAV”) on a monthly basis. Instead, the Company will include the NAV within its quarterly financial results press releases to aid shareholders with analysis of Company performance that can be analyzed with the Company’s quarterly unaudited financial statements.

    Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures:

    This press release contains references to “net asset value per share” (“NAV”) which is a non-GAAP financial measure. NAV is calculated as the value of total assets less the value of total liabilities divided by the total number of common shares outstanding as at a specific date. The term NAV does not have any standardized meaning according to GAAP and therefore may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies. There is no comparable GAAP financial measure presented in ThreeD’s consolidated financial statements and thus no applicable quantitative reconciliation for such non-GAAP financial measure. The Company believes that the measure provides information useful to its shareholders in understanding our performance, and may assist in the evaluation of the Company’s business relative to that of its peers.

    About ThreeD Capital Inc.

    ThreeD is a publicly-traded Canadian-based venture capital firm focused on opportunistic investments in companies in the junior resources and disruptive technologies sectors. ThreeD’s investment strategy is to invest in multiple private and public companies across a variety of sectors globally. ThreeD seeks to invest in early stage, promising companies where it may be the lead investor and can additionally provide investees with advisory services and access to the Company’s ecosystem.

    For further information:

    Matthew Davis, CPA
    Chief Financial Officer
    davis@threedcap.com
    Phone: 416-941-8900

    The Canadian Securities Exchange has neither approved nor disapproved the contents of this news release and accepts no responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy hereof.

    Forward-Looking Statements

    This news release contains certain forward-looking statements and forward-looking information (collectively referred to herein as “forward-looking statements”) within the meaning of Canadian securities laws including, without limitation, statements with respect to the future investments by the Company. All statements other than statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements. Undue reliance should not be placed on forward-looking statements, which are inherently uncertain, are based on estimates and assumptions, and are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties (both general and specific) that contribute to the possibility that the future events or circumstances contemplated by the forward- looking statements will not occur. Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements contained in this press release, and the assumptions on which such forward-looking statements are made, are reasonable, there can be no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements included in this document, as there can be no assurance that the plans, intentions or expectations upon which the forward-looking statements are based will occur. By their nature, forward-looking statements involve numerous assumptions, known and unknown risks and uncertainties that contribute to the possibility that the predictions, forecasts, projections and other forward-looking statements will not occur, which may cause the Company’s actual performance and results in future periods to differ materially from any estimates or projections of future performance or results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements contained in this news release are made as of the date hereof and the Company does not undertake any obligation to update publicly or to revise any of the included forward-looking statements, except as required by applicable law. The forward- looking statements contained herein are expressly qualified by this cautionary statement.

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Economics: Newest models in Microsoft’s Phi family empower developers with advanced AI capabilities

    Source: Microsoft

    Headline: Newest models in Microsoft’s Phi family empower developers with advanced AI capabilities

    We are excited to announce Phi-4-multimodal and Phi-4-mini, the newest models in Microsoft’s Phi family of small language models (SLMs). These models are designed to empower developers with advanced AI capabilities.

    We are excited to announce Phi-4-multimodal and Phi-4-mini, the newest models in Microsoft’s Phi family of small language models (SLMs). These models are designed to empower developers with advanced AI capabilities. Phi-4-multimodal, with its ability to process speech, vision, and text simultaneously, opens new possibilities for creating innovative and context-aware applications. Phi-4-mini, on the other hand, excels in text-based tasks, providing high accuracy and scalability in a compact form. Now available in Azure AI Foundry, HuggingFace, and the NVIDIA API Catalog where developers can explore the full potential of Phi-4-multimodal on the NVIDIA API Catalog, enabling them to experiment and innovate with ease. 

    What is Phi-4-multimodal?

    Phi-4-multimodal marks a new milestone in Microsoft’s AI development as our first multimodal language model. At the core of innovation lies continuous improvement, and that starts with listening to our customers. In direct response to customer feedback, we’ve developed Phi-4-multimodal, a 5.6B parameter model, that seamlessly integrates speech, vision, and text processing into a single, unified architecture.

    By leveraging advanced cross-modal learning techniques, this model enables more natural and context-aware interactions, allowing devices to understand and reason across multiple input modalities simultaneously. Whether interpreting spoken language, analyzing images, or processing textual information, it delivers highly efficient, low-latency inference—all while optimizing for on-device execution and reduced computational overhead.

    Redefining what’s possible with SLMs

    Natively built for multimodal experiences

    Phi-4-multimodal is a single model with mixture-of-LoRAs that includes speech, vision, and language, all processed simultaneously within the same representation space. The result is a single, unified model capable of handling text, audio, and visual inputs—no need for complex pipelines or separate models for different modalities.

    The Phi-4-multimodal is built on a new architecture that enhances efficiency and scalability. It incorporates a larger vocabulary for improved processing, supports multilingual capabilities, and integrates language reasoning with multimodal inputs. All of this is achieved within a powerful, compact, highly efficient model that’s suited for deployment on devices and edge computing platforms.

    This model represents a step forward for the Phi family of models, offering enhanced performance in a small package. Whether you’re looking for advanced AI capabilities on mobile devices or edge systems, Phi-4-multimodal provides a high-capability option that’s both efficient and versatile.

    Unlocking new capabilities

    With its increased range of capabilities and flexibility, Phi-4-multimodal opens exciting new possibilities for app developers, businesses, and industries looking to harness the power of AI in innovative ways. The future of multimodal AI is here, and it’s ready to transform your applications.

    Phi-4-multimodal is capable of processing both visual and audio together. The following table shows the model quality when the input query for vision content is synthetic speech on chart/table understanding and document reasoning tasks. Compared to other existing state-of-the-art omni models that can enable audio and visual signals as input, Phi-4-multimodal achieves much stronger performance on multiple benchmarks.

    Phi-4-multimodal has demonstrated remarkable capabilities in speech-related tasks, emerging as a leading open model in multiple areas. It outperforms specialized models like WhisperV3 and SeamlessM4T-v2-Large in both automatic speech recognition (ASR) and speech translation (ST). The model has claimed the top position on the Huggingface OpenASR leaderboard with an impressive word error rate of 6.14%, surpassing the previous best performance of 6.5% as of February 2025. Additionally, it is among a few open models to successfully implement speech summarization and achieve performance levels comparable to GPT-4o model. The model has a gap with close models, such as Gemini-2.0-Flash and GPT-4o-realtime-preview, on speech question answering (QA) tasks as the smaller model size results in less capacity to retain factual QA knowledge. Work is being undertaken to improve this capability in the next iterations.

    Phi-4-multimodal with only 5.6B parameters demonstrates remarkable vision capabilities across various benchmarks, most notably achieving strong performance on mathematical and science reasoning. Despite its smaller size, the model maintains competitive performance on general multimodal capabilities, such as document and chart understanding, Optical Character Recognition (OCR), and visual science reasoning, matching or exceeding close models like Gemini-2-Flash-lite-preview/Claude-3.5-Sonnet.

    What is Phi-4-mini?

    Phi-4-mini is a 3.8B parameter model and a dense, decoder-only transformer featuring grouped-query attention, 200,000 vocabulary, and shared input-output embeddings, designed for speed and efficiency. Despite its compact size, it continues outperforming larger models in text-based tasks, including reasoning, math, coding, instruction-following, and function-calling. Supporting sequences up to 128,000 tokens, it delivers high accuracy and scalability, making it a powerful solution for advanced AI applications.

    To understand the model quality, we compare Phi-4-mini with a set of models over a variety of benchmarks as shown in Figure 4.

    Function calling, instruction following, long context, and reasoning are powerful capabilities that enable small language models like Phi-4-mini to access external knowledge and functionality despite their limited capacity. Through a standardized protocol, function calling allows the model to seamlessly integrate with structured programming interfaces. When a user makes a request, Phi-4-Mini can reason through the query, identify and call relevant functions with appropriate parameters, receive the function outputs, and incorporate those results into its responses. This creates an extensible agentic-based system where the model’s capabilities can be enhanced by connecting it to external tools, application program interfaces (APIs), and data sources through well-defined function interfaces. The following example simulates a smart home control agent with Phi-4-mini.

    At Headwaters, we are leveraging fine-tuned SLM like Phi-4-mini on the edge to enhance operational efficiency and provide innovative solutions. Edge AI demonstrates outstanding performance even in environments with unstable network connections or in fields where confidentiality is paramount. This makes it highly promising for driving innovation across various industries, including anomaly detection in manufacturing, rapid diagnostic support in healthcare, and enhancing customer experiences in retail. We are looking forward to delivering new solutions in the AI agent era with Phi-4 mini.
     
    —Masaya Nishimaki, Company Director, Headwaters Co., Ltd. 

    Customization and cross-platform

    Thanks to their smaller sizes, Phi-4-mini and Phi-4-multimodal models can be used in compute-constrained inference environments. These models can be used on-device, especially when further optimized with ONNX Runtime for cross-platform availability. Their lower computational needs make them a lower cost option with much better latency. The longer context window enables taking in and reasoning over large text content—documents, web pages, code, and more. Phi-4-mini and multimodal demonstrates strong reasoning and logic capabilities, making it a good candidate for analytical tasks. Their small size also makes fine-tuning or customization easier and more affordable. The table below shows examples of finetuning scenarios with Phi-4-multimodal.

    Tasks Base Model Finetuned Model Compute
    Speech translation from English to Indonesian 17.4 35.5 3 hours, 16 A100
    Medical visual question answering 47.6 56.7 5 hours, 8 A100

    For more information about customization or to learn more about the models, take a look at Phi Cookbook on GitHub. 

    How can these models be used in action?

    These models are designed to handle complex tasks efficiently, making them ideal for edge case scenarios and compute-constrained environments. Given the new capabilities Phi-4-multimodal and Phi-4-mini bring, the uses of Phi are only expanding. Phi models are being embedded into AI ecosystems and used to explore various use cases across industries.

    Language models are powerful reasoning engines, and integrating small language models like Phi into Windows allows us to maintain efficient compute capabilities and opens the door to a future of continuous intelligence baked in across all your apps and experiences. Copilot+ PCs will build upon Phi-4-multimodal’s capabilities, delivering the power of Microsoft’s advanced SLMs without the energy drain. This integration will enhance productivity, creativity, and education-focused experiences, becoming a standard part of our developer platform.

    —Vivek Pradeep, Vice President Distinguished Engineer of Windows Applied Sciences.

    1. Embedded directly to your smart device: Phone manufacturers integrating Phi-4-multimodal directly into a smartphone could enable smartphones to process and understand voice commands, recognize images, and interpret text seamlessly. Users could benefit from advanced features like real-time language translation, enhanced photo and video analysis, and intelligent personal assistants that understand and respond to complex queries. This would elevate the user experience by providing powerful AI capabilities directly on the device, ensuring low latency and high efficiency.
    2. On the road: Imagine an automotive company integrating Phi-4-multimodal into their in-car assistant systems. The model could enable vehicles to understand and respond to voice commands, recognize driver gestures, and analyze visual inputs from cameras. For instance, it could enhance driver safety by detecting drowsiness through facial recognition and providing real-time alerts. Additionally, it could offer seamless navigation assistance, interpret road signs, and provide contextual information, creating a more intuitive and safer driving experience while connected to the cloud and offline when connectivity isn’t available.
    3. Multilingual financial services: Imagine a financial services company integrating Phi-4-mini to automate complex financial calculations, generate detailed reports, and translate financial documents into multiple languages. For instance, the model can assist analysts by performing intricate mathematical computations required for risk assessments, portfolio management, and financial forecasting. Additionally, it can translate financial statements, regulatory documents, and client communications into various languages and could improve client relations globally.

    Microsoft’s commitment to security and safety

    Azure AI Foundry provides users with a robust set of capabilities to help organizations measure, mitigate, and manage AI risks across the AI development lifecycle for traditional machine learning and generative AI applications. Azure AI evaluations in AI Foundry enable developers to iteratively assess the quality and safety of models and applications using built-in and custom metrics to inform mitigations.

    Both models underwent security and safety testing by our internal and external security experts using strategies crafted by Microsoft AI Red Team (AIRT). These methods, developed over previous Phi models, incorporate global perspectives and native speakers of all supported languages. They span areas such as cybersecurity, national security, fairness, and violence, addressing current trends through multilingual probing. Using AIRT’s open-source Python Risk Identification Toolkit (PyRIT) and manual probing, red teamers conducted single-turn and multi-turn attacks. Operating independently from the development teams, AIRT continuously shared insights with the model team. This approach assessed the new AI security and safety landscape introduced by our latest Phi models, ensuring the delivery of high-quality capabilities.

    Take a look at the model cards for Phi-4-multimodal and Phi-4-mini, and the technical paper to see an outline of recommended uses and limitations for these models.

    Learn more about Phi-4

    We invite you to come explore the possibilities with Phi-4-multimodal and Phi-4-mini in Azure AI Foundry, Hugging Face, and NVIDIA API Catalog with a full multimodal experience. We can’t wait to hear your feedback and see the incredible things you will accomplish with our new models. 

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI China: National high-tech zones host two-thirds of China’s unicorn firms

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    BEIJING, Feb. 26 — China’s national high-tech industrial development zones have become major bases for startups valued at over 1 billion U.S. dollars, according to the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology.

    The country’s 178 national high-tech industrial development zones were home to approximately 67 percent of China’s unicorn firms by the end of 2024, the ministry told a press conference on Wednesday.

    These zones housed about one-third of the country’s high-tech enterprises and 46 percent of its “little giant” firms, which refer to the novel elites among small and medium-sized enterprises that are engaged in manufacturing, specialize in a niche market and boast cutting-edge technologies.

    Notably, these zones host approximately 60 percent of the country’s publicly listed artificial intelligence (AI) companies and about half of its AI unicorns, the ministry said.

    These zones registered steady economic growth last year, with their total gross domestic product up 7.6 percent year on year in nominal terms.

    These high-tech zones also achieved fruitful results in opening-up and international cooperation, with total import and export volumes of goods and services hitting 9.5 trillion yuan, representing a 2.5 percent year-on-year growth.

    To boost their technological and industrial innovation, the government will combine zone development with strategic national sci-tech resources, and step up its cultivation of gazelle and unicorn companies, according to ministry official Wu Jiaxi.

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI China: 5th China International Consumer Products Expo to spotlight high-tech innovation

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    HAIKOU, Feb. 26 — The fifth China International Consumer Products Expo (CICPE), a key platform for global trade and consumption trends, will take place in Haikou, the capital city of south China’s Hainan Province, from April 13 to 18, the event’s organizers announced at a press briefing on Wednesday.

    Co-hosted by China’s Ministry of Commerce and the Hainan provincial government, this year’s expo will feature expanded international participation and first-time innovations.

    Aligning with China’s innovation priorities, the expo will highlight sectors such as artificial intelligence, low-altitude aviation, smart vehicles and digital health. Tech leaders like Huawei, iFLYTEK and Tesla will showcase cutting-edge solutions.

    The main venue remains the Hainan International Convention and Exhibition Center this year, with additional duty-free shopping zones in international duty-free complexes in Haikou and Sanya. A yacht exhibition will also be held in Sanya.

    Newcomers to the event will include delegations from Slovakia, Brazil and Singapore. Multinational giants such as U.S.-based Estée Lauder and Germany’s Volkswagen will also be among this year’s exhibitors.

    Domestic exhibitors will present premium and local products, and a section of the expo will be dedicated to connecting foreign buyers with Chinese manufacturers through tailored investment matchmaking.

    The CICPE is China’s only national-level exhibition featuring consumer products, and it is the largest consumer expo in the Asia-Pacific region.

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI China: China remains attractive investment destination: report

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    GUANGZHOU, Feb. 26 — The American Chamber of Commerce in South China (AmCham South China) released on Wednesday its 2025 Special Report on the State of Business in South China, which highlighted that the world’s second-largest economy continues to be an attractive investment destination.

    This year’s report, the 21st in the series, provides a comprehensive and quantitative analysis of the business community, offering valuable insights into development trends in South China. A total of 316 companies participated in the latest survey in 2024.

    The report highlights China’s leading position in global investment priorities, with 58 percent of foreign companies surveyed ranking it among their top three investment priorities. Looking ahead to 2025, 76 percent of the companies intend to reinvest in China, with a notable 74 percent of American companies planning reinvestments, up 11 percentage points year on year.

    The surveyed companies are mainly from the U.S., China, and the European Union. More than half of them are wholly foreign-owned, and over 30 percent are American-invested. The proportion of companies that generated over 60 percent of their global revenue from China increased by 5 percentage points, reaching a total of 31 percent, said the report.

    ExxonMobil China is a testament to the increasing confidence foreign investors have in the country, with the company recently launching trial production at a new petrochemical project in Guangdong’s Huizhou. Additionally, it will open a cutting-edge technology center in the province to bolster its research and development capabilities to support global customers.

    “China is a key part of our growth strategy, and Guangdong is an outstanding partner. We strongly value its professional and efficient government, well-developed infrastructure and business-friendly environment, and skilled workforce,” said Jean-Marc Taton, chairman of ExxonMobil China.

    Growth potential of the Chinese market continues to be the primary driver for increasing investments in China or shifting investments from other markets to China, followed by the industrial cluster effect and preferential policies, according to Harley Seyedin, Chairman and President of AmCham South China.

    In 2024, China’s GDP reached a record 134.91 trillion yuan (about 18.81 trillion U.S. dollars), marking a 5-percent year-on-year increase. This robust economic performance continues to attract global investors. Additionally, the ongoing policy incentives from China have also boosted the confidence of foreign enterprises.

    In February, China issued an action plan to stabilize foreign investment, with efforts to expand opening-up in sectors like telecommunication, biotechnology and medical services, and offering comprehensive services for foreign-invested projects.

    It encourages foreign investment in the high-tech and animal husbandry industries, and in services such as health care and finance. The plan also lifts restrictions on loans for foreign firms and ensures equal participation in government procurement for both foreign and domestic companies.

    “China is in the process of moving up the value chain, and we believe the Chinese consumer market will continue to grow exponentially,” Seyedin said. He noted that over 73 percent of AmCham’s member companies in south China are no longer focused on exports; instead, they are primarily involved in importing or producing goods and services for the Chinese market.

    Last September, China’s National Development and Reform Commission and the Ministry of Commerce jointly issued the 2024 version of the negative list for foreign investment access, announcing the removal of all restrictions on foreign investment in the manufacturing sector.

    This move is viewed favorably by a substantial proportion of the companies surveyed, with some optimistic that the policy will create greater investment opportunities and broader market access, thereby facilitating expansion and growth.

    Seyedin told Xinhua that lifting all restrictions on manufacturing investment in China could lead to a 30-percent increase in investment activities and an expansion of the country’s manufacturing capabilities.

    It is estimated that the member companies of AmCham South China have set aside a total of 14.59 billion U.S. dollars from their profits in China for reinvestment over the next three to five years. This will be used to expand existing operations and capture additional market share, representing a 33.18-percent increase compared to the previous reinvestment figure.

    “Businesses are increasing their commitments in China to secure a stronger foothold in this critical market. The reinvestment surge signals confidence in China’s future, and their hope for U.S.-China increased cooperation,” Seyedin said.

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: Transform Finance-Development Relationship from Vicious Cycle into Virtuous One, Deputy Secretary-General Urges Group of 20

    Source: United Nations MIL OSI b

    Following is UN Deputy Secretary-General Amina Mohammed’s message, as prepared for delivery, on the occasion of the Group of 20 (G20) Finance Ministers and Central Banks Meeting Session II:  International Financial Architecture, held in Cape Town, South Africa, today:

    Let me begin by thanking our South African hosts for their warm hospitality and leadership.  Cape Town — this vibrant city where two oceans meet — could not be a more fitting location for a presidency that aims to bridge divides.

    South Africa takes the helm of the G20 at a testing time.  Global gross domestic product (GDP) this year is projected to fall below pre-pandemic averages.  Poor countries are no longer converging towards the income levels of rich countries. 

    This “new normal” of low growth affects the possibilities of developing countries to navigate the energy transition, and build resilient, fair societies.  It ultimately affects whether people will fulfill their potential or not — and whether the promise of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) will be kept.

    We are especially worried about the halting effect of high uncertainty on investment, the possibility of a new inflationary shock resulting from trade disruptions, and the scope for higher-for-longer interest rates that would exacerbate the debt crisis affecting developing economies.

    To face these challenges, we need an international financial architecture that can support economies to grow, liberating them from a vicious cycle where high debt leads to low investment, low investment to low growth, and low growth back to high debt.

    We need an architecture where the cost of capital to developing countries is low, enabling capital to flow where it can be most productive.  The G20 has a unique responsibility to lead this reform.  Three key actions are essential.

    First, we must further strengthen multilateral development banks.  The G20 Roadmap for Better, Bigger and More Effective Multilateral Development Banks points us in the right direction.  Now we must accelerate.  A successful replenishment of the African Development Fund will be a crucial milestone.

    Second, we need a comprehensive approach to the debt crisis.  Member States have put forward important structural proposals in advance of the fourth International Conference on Financing for Development, which we look to the G20 to support.

    Third, we must strengthen the global financial safety net, with the International Monetary Fund (IMF) at its core, to shield all economies in a shock-prone world.  We must channel special drawing rights to where they are most needed. We urge the G20 to use its voice to support the progress and reform developing countries need.

    With the right reforms, and with sufficient political will, we can transform the relationship between finance and development from a vicious cycle into a virtuous one.  This is the promise of South Africa’s G20 presidency — and of your leadership.

    MIL OSI United Nations News