NewzIntel.com

    • Checkout Page
    • Contact Us
    • Default Redirect Page
    • Frontpage
    • Home-2
    • Home-3
    • Lost Password
    • Member Login
    • Member LogOut
    • Member TOS Page
    • My Account
    • NewzIntel Alert Control-Panel
    • NewzIntel Latest Reports
    • Post Views Counter
    • Privacy Policy
    • Public Individual Page
    • Register
    • Subscription Plan
    • Thank You Page

Category: Business

  • MIL-OSI: CNB Financial Corporation Reports Second Quarter 2025 Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    CLEARFIELD, Pa., July 22, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) —

    CNB Financial Corporation (“Corporation”) (NASDAQ: CCNE), the parent company of CNB Bank, today announced its earnings for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025.

    Key Financial Trends

    • Earnings – Net income available to common shareholders (“earnings”) was $12.9 million, or $0.61 per diluted share, and $10.4 million, or $0.50 per diluted share, for the three months ended June 30, 2025 and March 31, 2025, respectively.
      • Excluding after-tax merger costs, earnings were $13.2 million, or $0.63 per diluted share, for the three months ended June 30, 2025, reflecting an increase of $1.3 million, or 11.31%, and $0.06 per diluted share, or 10.53%, compared to earnings of $11.9 million, or $0.57 per diluted share, for the three months ended March 31, 2025.1
    • Loans – At June 30, 2025, loans totaled $4.7 billion, excluding the balances of syndicated loans, representing a quarterly increase of $113.7 million, or 2.50% (10.04% annualized), compared to March 31, 2025.
    • Deposits – At June 30, 2025, total deposits were $5.5 billion, reflecting a quarterly increase of $7.0 million, or 0.13% (0.51% annualized), compared to March 31, 2025.
      • The second quarter of 2025 included the exits/reductions of higher cost municipal deposits totaling approximately $77.7 million. Excluding the impact of these exits/reductions, total deposits increased approximately $84.7 million or 1.55% (6.22% annualized), compared to the first quarter of 2025.1
    • Net Interest Margin – Net interest margin was 3.60% for the three months ended June 30, 2025, compared to 3.38% for the three months ended March 31, 2025. Net interest margin on a fully tax-equivalent basis, a non-GAAP measure, was 3.59% and 3.37%, for the three months ended June 30, 2025 and March 31, 2025, respectively.1
    • Credit Quality – Total nonperforming assets were approximately $30.4 million, or 0.48% of total assets, as of June 30, 2025, compared to $56.1 million, or 0.89% of total assets, as of March 31, 2025. The $25.7 million decrease in nonperforming assets for the three months ended June 30, 2025, was primarily due to the resolution of approximately $24.1 million in non-performing assets, as discussed in more detail below.
      • Net loan charge-offs were $3.3 million, or 0.28% (annualized) of average total loans and loans held for sale, for the three months ended June 30 2025, compared to $1.4 million, or 0.13% (annualized) of average total loans and loans held for sale, during the three months ended March 31, 2025.
    • Capital – As of June 30, 2025, the Corporation’s ratio of common shareholders’ equity to total assets was 9.17% compared to 9.00% at March 31, 2025. As of June 30, 2025 and March 31, 2025, the Corporation’s ratio of tangible common equity to tangible assets, a non-GAAP measure, was 8.53% and 8.36%, respectively.1

    Executive Summary

    • Net income available to common shareholders (“earnings”) was $12.9 million, or $0.61 per diluted share, and $10.4 million, or $0.50 per diluted share, for the three months ended June 30, 2025 and March 31, 2025, respectively. Excluding after-tax merger costs, earnings were $13.2 million, or $0.63 per diluted share, for the three months ended June 30, 2025, reflecting an increase of $1.3 million, or 11.31%, and $0.06 per diluted share, or 10.53%, compared to earnings of $11.9 million, or $0.57 per diluted share, for the three months ended March 31, 2025.1 The quarterly increase was a result of an increase in net interest income and non-interest income, and a decrease in non-interest expense, partially offset by an increase in the provision for credit losses, as discussed in more detail below. Excluding after-tax merger costs in the second quarter 2025, earnings and diluted earnings per share when compared to earnings of $11.9 million, or $0.56 per diluted share, in the quarter ended June 30, 2024, increased $1.4 million, or 11.41%, and $0.07 per diluted share, or 12.50%, due to an increase in net interest income and non-interest income, partially offset by increases in non-interest expense and the provision for credit losses.1
    • Earnings were $23.3 million, or $1.10 per diluted share, for the six months ended June 30, 2025. Excluding after-tax merger costs, earnings were $25.1 million, or $1.19 per diluted share, for the six months ended June 30, 2025, reflecting an increase of $1.7 million, or 7.37%, and $0.08 per diluted share, or 7.21%, compared to earnings of $23.4 million, or $1.11 per diluted share, for the six months ended June 30, 2024.1 The year-to-date increase was a result of an increase in net interest income, partially offset by a decrease in non-interest income, and increases in non-interest expense and the provision for credit losses, as discussed in more detail below.
    • At June 30, 2025, loans totaled $4.7 billion, excluding the balances of syndicated loans. This total of $4.7 billion in loans represented a quarterly increase of $113.7 million, or 2.50% (10.04% annualized), compared to March 31, 2025, and a year-over-year increase of $228.7 million, or 5.17%, compared to June 30, 2024. The increase in loans for the quarter ended June 30, 2025, compared to the quarter ended March 31, 2025, and the year-over-year increase in loans as of June 30, 2025, compared to June 30, 2024, was primarily driven by growth in the ERIEBANK, Ridge View Bank, BankOnBuffalo, and the legacy CNB markets, as well as CNB Bank’s Private Banking division.
      • At June 30, 2025, the syndicated loan portfolio totaled $78.9 million, or 1.67% of total loans, compared to $69.2 million, or 1.50% of total loans, at March 31, 2025 and $53.9 million, or 1.20% of total loans, at June 30, 2024. The increase in syndicated lending balances of $9.7 million compared to March 31, 2025 and $25.0 million compared to June 30, 2024 reflects the Corporation’s continued focus on evaluating the level and composition of its syndicated loan portfolio to ensure it continues to provide strong credit quality, profitable use of excess liquidity, and complement the Corporation’s loan growth from its in-market customer relationships.
    • At June 30, 2025, total deposits were $5.5 billion, reflecting a quarterly increase of $7.0 million, or 0.13% (0.51% annualized), compared to March 31, 2025, and a year-over-year increase of $356.2 million, or 6.97%, compared to total deposits measured as of June 30, 2024. The growth in total deposits in the second quarter of 2025 includes the exit/reductions of higher cost municipal deposits totaling approximately $77.7 million. Excluding the impact of these exit/reductions, total deposits increased approximately $84.7 million or 1.55% (6.22% annualized).1 The increase in deposit balances for the quarter ended June 30, 2025, compared to the quarter ended March 31, 2025, and the year-over-year increase in deposit balances as of June 30, 2025, was driven primarily by higher Treasury Management sourced business and municipal deposits, coupled with growth in retail accounts, including time deposits. Additional deposit and liquidity profile details were as follows:
      • At June 30, 2025, the total estimated uninsured deposits for CNB Bank were approximately $1.6 billion, or approximately 28.62% of total CNB Bank deposits. However, when excluding $103.5 million of affiliate company deposits and $509.0 million of pledged-investment collateralized deposits, the adjusted amount and percentage of total estimated uninsured deposits was approximately $982.0 million, or approximately 17.63% of total CNB Bank deposits as of June 30, 2025.
        • The level of adjusted uninsured deposits at June 30, 2025 remained relatively unchanged, compared to the level at March 31, 2025, when the total estimated uninsured deposits for CNB Bank were approximately $1.6 billion, or approximately 27.94% of total CNB Bank deposits. Excluding $101.9 million of affiliate company deposits and $481.2 million of pledged-investment collateralized deposits, the adjusted amount and percentage of total estimated uninsured deposits were approximately $971.1 million, or approximately 17.46% of total CNB Bank deposits as of March 31, 2025.
      • At June 30, 2025, the average deposit balance per account for CNB Bank was approximately $34 thousand, which has remained stable at this level for an extended period.
      • At June 30, 2025, the Corporation had $332.2 million of cash equivalents held in CNB Bank’s interest-bearing deposit account at the Federal Reserve. These excess funds, when combined with collective contingent liquidity resources of $4.6 billion including (i) available borrowing capacity from the Federal Home Bank of Pittsburgh (“FHLB”) and the Federal Reserve, and (ii) available unused commitments from brokered deposit sources and other third-party funding channels, including previously established lines of credit from correspondent banks, resulted in the total available liquidity sources for the Corporation as of June 30, 2025 to be approximately 5.1 times the estimated amount of adjusted uninsured deposit balances discussed above.
    • At June 30, 2025, March 31, 2025, and June 30, 2024, the Corporation had no outstanding short-term borrowings from the FHLB or the Federal Reserve’s Discount Window.
    • At June 30, 2025, the Corporation’s pre-tax net unrealized losses on the combined portfolios of available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities totaled $55.6 million, or 8.73% of total shareholders’ equity, compared to $61.7 million, or 9.88% of total shareholders’ equity, at March 31, 2025, and $84.1 million, or 14.33% of total shareholders’ equity, at June 30, 2024. The change in unrealized losses during the first second quarter 2025 was primarily due to changes in the yield curve compared to the first quarter of 2024 and second quarter of 2024, coupled with the Corporation’s scheduled bond maturities, which were all realized at par. Importantly, all regulatory capital ratios for the Corporation would still exceed regulatory “well-capitalized” levels as of June 30, 2025, March 31, 2025, and June 30, 2024 if the net unrealized losses at the respective dates were fully recognized. Additionally, the Corporation continued to maintain excess liquidity at its holding company totaling approximately $102.2 million of liquid funds at June 30, 2025, which more than covers the $55.6 million in combined available-for-sale and held-to-maturity unrealized losses on investments held primarily in its wholly-owned banking subsidiary, as an immediately available source of contingent capital to be down-streamed to CNB Bank, if necessary.
    • Total nonperforming assets were approximately $30.4 million, or 0.48% of total assets, as of June 30, 2025, compared to $56.1 million, or 0.89% of total assets, as of March 31, 2025, and $36.5 million, or 0.62% of total assets, as of June 30, 2024. The $25.7 million decrease in nonperforming assets for the three months ended June 30, 2025, compared to the three months ended March 31, 2025 was primarily due to paydowns to workout-related efforts on two larger nonaccrual loan relationships, and resulting charge-offs on these workouts and other smaller problem loans. The most significant charge-offs were $1.5 million for an owner-occupied commercial real estate relationship (balance of approximately $3.8 million with a specific reserve balance of $1.4 million) and a $1.1 million charge-off of a multifamily commercial real estate loan (balance of approximately $20.3 million with a specific reserve balance of $885 thousand). The $6.2 million decrease in nonperforming assets at June 30, 2025 compared to June 30, 2024 was due to charge-off of the owner-occupied commercial real estate relationship previously discussed, coupled with paydowns to nonaccrual loans. For the three months ended June 30, 2025, net loan charge-offs were $3.3 million, or 0.28% (annualized) of average total loans and loans held for sale, compared to $1.4 million, or 0.13% (annualized) of average total loans and loans held for sale, during the three months ended March 31, 2025, and $2.8 million, or 0.25% (annualized) of average total loans and loans held for sale, during the three months ended June 30, 2024.
    • Pre-provision net revenue (“PPNR”), a non-GAAP measure, was $21.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025 and $15.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025.1 Excluding merger costs, PPNR was $21.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025, compared to $17.4 million and $18.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and June 30, 2024, respectively.1 The second quarter 2025 PPNR, excluding merger costs, when compared to the first quarter of 2025, reflected increases in net interest income and non-interest income and a decrease in non-interest expense. The increase in PPNR for the three months ended June 30, 2025, compared to the three months ended June 30, 2024 was primarily attributable to higher net interest income, partially offset by an increase in non-interest expenses. PPNR was $37.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025.1 Excluding merger costs, PPNR was $39.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025, compared to $35.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2024.1 The year-to-date 2025 PPNR, excluding merger costs, when compared to the year-to-date 2024 PPNR, reflected increases in net interest income, partially offset by a decrease in non-interest income and an increase in non-interest expense.

    1 This release contains references to certain financial measures that are not defined by U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”). Management believes that these non-GAAP measures provide a greater understanding of ongoing operations, enhance comparability of results of operations with prior periods and show the effects of significant gains and charges in the periods presented. A reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures is provided in the “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures” section.

    Michael Peduzzi, President and CEO of both the Corporation and CNB Bank, stated, “Favorably, our second quarter earnings and growth reflected the positive momentum of continued commercial loan growth and demand that we saw at the end of the first quarter with both existing relationships and new prospects. This momentum included realized deposit and relationship growth based in our Treasury Management activities, as evidenced by favorable growth in our noninterest-bearing deposits. These volume increases in our core net interest income components were complemented by increases in our average loan yield and continued decreases in our cost of interest-bearing funds, resulting in a favorable 22 basis point increase in our taxable-equivalent net interest margin compared to the first quarter. We continue to see both a sound loan pipeline and opportunities for further cost-of-fund interest reductions as we enter the third quarter. Importantly, as we release these second quarter earnings, we are ready to close and begin the integration of our acquisition of ESSA Bancorp, Inc. and its subsidiary, ESSA Bank and Trust (collectively, “ESSA”), with legal merger close scheduled to occur at the end of day on July 23, 2025. The addition of this wonderful franchise and related employee team will add significantly to CNB’s earning-asset base and market footprint, allowing us to deliver great banking and wealth management experiences for clients in the Northeastern Pennsylvania markets served by ESSA. In addition to the increased net interest income earning and growth capabilities we expect from our business combination, we look to continue to focus on tightly managing the Corporation’s core overhead, while realizing economies-of-scale cost efficiencies from the ESSA acquisition, as we look to realize both increased positive operating leverage and further accretion to our net interest margin and overall earnings. We are honored to welcome the clients, employees, and investors from ESSA to our CNB family.”

    Other Balance Sheet Highlights

    • Book value per common share was $27.44 and $27.01 at June 30, 2025 and March 31, 2025, respectively. Excluding after-tax merger costs, book value per common share was $27.53, reflecting an increase of $0.45, or 6.67% (annualized), from $27.08 at March 31, 2025 and a year-over-year increase of $2.34, or 9.29%, from $25.19 at June 30, 2024.1 Tangible book value per common share, a non-GAAP measure, was $25.35 and $24.91 as of June 30, 2025 and March 31, 2025, respectively. Excluding after-tax merger costs, tangible book value per common share, a non-GAAP measure, was $25.44, reflecting an increase of $0.46, or 7.39% (annualized) from $24.98 as of March 31, 2025 and a year-over-year increase of $2.35, or 10.18%, from $23.09 as of June 30, 2024.1 The increases in book value per common share and tangible book value per common share, excluding after-tax merger costs, from March 31, 2025 to June 30, 2025 were primarily due to a $9.1 million increase in retained earnings, coupled with a $3.0 million decrease in accumulated other comprehensive loss primarily from the after-tax impact of temporary unrealized valuation changes in the Corporation’s available-for-sale investment portfolio for the second quarter of 2025. The increases in book value per common share and tangible book value per common share, excluding after-tax merger costs, from June 30, 2024 to June 30, 2025 were primarily due to a $35.0 million increase in retained earnings over the twelve months ended June 30, 2025 coupled with a $13.9 million decrease in accumulated other comprehensive loss primarily from the after-tax impact of temporary unrealized valuation changes in the Corporation’s available-for-sale investment portfolio for the past twelve months.

    Loan Portfolio Profile

    • As part of its lending policy and risk management activities, the Corporation tracks lending exposure by industry classification and type to determine potential risks associated with industry concentrations, and to identify any concentration risk issues that could lead to additional credit loss exposure. An important and recurring part of this process involves the Corporation’s continued measurement and evaluation of its exposure to the office, hospitality, and multifamily industries within its commercial real estate portfolio. Even given the Corporation’s historically sound underwriting protocols and high credit quality standards for borrowers in the commercial real estate industry segments, the Corporation monitors numerous relevant sensitivity elements, including occupancy, loan-to-value, absorption and cap rates, debt service coverage and covenant compliance, and developer/lessor financial strength both in the project and globally. At June 30, 2025, the Corporation had the following key metrics related to its office, hospitality and multifamily portfolios:
      • Commercial office loans:
        • There were 113 outstanding loans, totaling $111.1 million, or 2.35% of total Corporation loans outstanding;
        • There were no nonaccrual commercial office loans;
        • There were two past-due commercial office loans that totaled $209 thousand, or 0.19% of total commercial office loans outstanding; and
        • The average outstanding balance per commercial office loan was $983 thousand.
      • Commercial hospitality loans:
        • There were 156 outstanding loans, totaling $321.2 million, or 6.79% of total Corporation loans outstanding;
        • There were no nonaccrual commercial hospitality loans;
        • There were no past-due commercial hospitality loans; and
        • The average outstanding balance per commercial hospitality loan was $2.1 million.
      • Commercial multifamily loans:
        • There were 223 outstanding loans, totaling $405.4 million, or 8.57% of total Corporation loans outstanding;
        • There was one nonaccrual and past-due commercial multifamily loan that totaled $199 thousand, or 0.05% of total multifamily loans outstanding; and
        • The average outstanding balance per commercial multifamily loan was $1.8 million.

    The Corporation had no commercial office, hospitality or multifamily loan relationships considered by the banking regulators to be high volatility commercial real estate (“HVCRE”) credits.

    Performance Ratios

    • Annualized return on average equity was 8.83% and 7.52% for the three months ended June 30, 2025 and March 31, 2025, respectively. Excluding after-tax merger costs, annualized return on average equity was 9.06% for the three months ended June 30, 2025, compared to 8.49% and 8.94% for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and June 30, 2024, respectively.1 Annualized return on average equity was 8.18% for the six months ended June 30, 2025. Excluding after-tax merger costs, annualized return on average equity was 8.78% for the six months ended June 30, 2025, compared to 8.86% for the six months ended June 30, 2024.1
    • Annualized return on average tangible common equity, a non-GAAP measure, was 9.71% and 8.15% for the three months ended June 30, 2025 and March 31, 2025, respectively. Excluding after-tax merger costs, annualized return on average tangible common equity was 9.98% for the three months ended June 30, 2025, compared to 9.32% and 9.93% for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and June 30, 2024, respectively.1 Annualized return on average tangible common equity was 8.95% for the six months ended June 30, 2025. Excluding after-tax merger costs, annualized return on average tangible common equity was 9.66% for the six months ended June 30, 2025, compared to 9.85% for the six months ended June 30, 2024.1
    • The Corporation’s efficiency ratio was 64.73% and 72.07% for the three months ended June 30, 2025 and March 31, 2025, respectively, and 64.08% and 71.28%, respectively, on a fully tax-equivalent basis, a non-GAAP measure.1 Excluding merger costs, the efficiency ratio on a fully tax-equivalent basis, a non-GAAP measure, was 63.50%, compared to 68.62% and 65.20% for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and June 30, 2024, respectively.1 The quarter-over-quarter decrease was primarily driven by higher net interest income and non-interest income and decreased non-interest expense, as further discussed below. The year-over-year decrease was primarily driven by an increase in net interest income, partially offset by an increase in non-interest expense. The Corporation’s efficiency ratio was 68.27% for the six months ended June 30, 2025, and 67.55% on a fully tax-equivalent basis, a non-GAAP measure.1 Excluding merger costs, the efficiency ratio on a fully tax-equivalent basis, a non-GAAP measure, was 65.97%, compared to 66.74% for the six months ended June 30, 2024.1 The year-over-year decrease was primarily driven by higher net interest income, partially offset by higher non-interest expense.

    Revenue

    • Total revenue (net interest income plus non-interest income) was $61.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025, an increase when compared to $56.9 million and $54.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and June 30, 2024, respectively.
      • Net interest income was $52.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025, compared to $48.4 million and $45.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and June 30, 2024, respectively. When comparing the second quarter of 2025 to the first quarter of 2025, the increase in net interest income of $3.8 million, or 7.78% (31.19% annualized), was primarily due to the change in the earning asset mix from interest-bearing deposits to loans, coupled with changes in the yield curve.
      • Net interest margin was 3.60%, 3.38%, and 3.36% for the three months ended June 30, 2025, March 31, 2025, and June 30, 2024, respectively. Net interest margin on a fully tax-equivalent basis, a non-GAAP measure, was 3.59%, 3.37% and 3.34% for the three months ended June 30, 2025, March 31, 2025, and June 30, 2024, respectively.1
        • The yield on earning assets of 5.89% for the three months ended June 30, 2025 increased 16 basis points from March 31, 2025 and was unchanged compared to June 30, 2024. The increase in yield in the second quarter of 2025 compared to quarter ended March 31, 2025 was attributable to quarter-over-quarter increases in the yield on both the loan and securities portfolios.
        • The cost of interest-bearing liabilities was 2.88% for the three months ended June 30, 2025, representing a decrease of 5 basis points from March 31, 2025 and a 29 basis points from June 30, 2024. The decrease in the cost of interest-bearing liabilities is primarily the result of the Corporation’s targeted interest-bearing deposit rate decreases in response to the Federal Reserve rate decreases since mid-September 2024.
    • Total revenue was $118.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025 compared to $108.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2024.
      • Net interest income was $100.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025 compared to $90.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2024. When comparing the six months ended June 30, 2025 to the six months ended June 30, 2024, the increase in net interest income of $9.7 million, or 10.65% (21.37% annualized), was due to investment and loan growth.
      • Net interest margin was 3.49% and 3.38% for the six months ended June 30, 2025 and June 30, 2024, respectively. Net interest margin on a fully tax-equivalent basis, a non-GAAP measure, was 3.48% and 3.36% for the six months ended June 30, 2025 and June 30, 2024, respectively.1
        • The yield on earning assets of 5.81% for the six months ended June 30, 2025 decreased 4 basis points from June 30, 2024. The decrease in yield compared to June 30, 2024 was attributable to lower loan yields on variable and floating-rate loans following the three Federal Reserve rate decreases totaling 100 basis points since mid-September 2024.
        • The cost of interest-bearing liabilities of 2.90% for the six months ended June 30, 2025 decreased 20 basis points from June 30, 2024, primarily the result of the Corporation’s targeted interest-bearing deposit rate decreases in response to the Federal Reserve rate decreases since mid-September 2024.
    • Total non-interest income was $9.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025 compared to $8.5 million and $8.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and June 30, 2024, respectively. The quarter-over-quarter increase was primarily attributable to an increase in wealth and asset management fees, bank owned life insurance revenue (death benefit), and an improvement in unrealized gains on equity securities, partially offset by lower pass-through income from small business investment companies (“SBICs”). The increase year-over-year in non-interest income was primarily due to increases in bank owned life insurance (death benefit) and an improvement in unrealized gains on equity securities, partially offset by lower other charges and fees, coupled with lower pass-through income from SBICs.
    • Total non-interest income was $17.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025 compared to $17.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2024. This decrease was primarily due to lower other charges and fees, coupled with lower pass-through income from SBICs, partially offset by an increase in unrealized gains on equity securities, bank owned life insurance revenue (death benefit) and card processing and interchange income.

    Non-Interest Expense

    • For the three months ended June 30, 2025 and March 31, 2025 total non-interest expense was $39.6 million and $41.0 million, respectively. Excluding merger costs, total non-interest expense for the three months ended June 30, 2025 was $39.3 million, compared to $39.5 million and $36.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and June 30, 2024, respectively.1 Excluding merger costs, the decrease of $249 thousand, or 0.63%, from the three months ended March 31, 2025, was primarily driven by a decrease in salaries and benefits, due to a decrease in staffing levels, coupled with retirement plan contribution accruals. The Corporation tightly managed its core back-office staffing levels in anticipation of the impact of staffing additions from the planned ESSA acquisition. Excluding merger costs, the $3.3 million increase in non-interest expense compared to the three months ended June 30, 2024 was primarily driven by higher salaries and benefits, reflecting increased incentive compensation accruals and retirement plan contribution accruals. Additionally, occupancy expense increased, primarily due to higher rent expense related to three additional full-service office locations, coupled with an increase in card processing and interchange expenses and other non-interest expenses (timing of business development expenses). The increase in card processing and interchange expenses related to the changes made by the Corporation to its cardholder rewards program during the second quarter 2024.
    • For the six months ended June 30, 2025 total non-interest expense was $80.7 million. Excluding merger costs, total non-interest expense was $78.8 million, compared to $73.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2024. Excluding merger costs, the increase of $5.4 million, or 7.30%, from the six months ended June 30, 2024, was primarily driven by higher salaries and benefits, reflecting increased base salaries for inflationary annual increases, higher incentive compensation accruals, and increased retirement plan contribution accruals. Additionally, occupancy expense increased, primarily due to higher rent expense related to three additional full-service office locations, coupled with an increase in card processing and interchange expenses and other non-interest expenses (timing of business development expenses).

    Income Taxes

    • Income tax expense for the three months ended June 30, 2025 was $3.3 million, representing a 19.10% effective tax rate, compared to $2.9 million, representing a 19.96% effective tax rate, for the three months ended March 31, 2025, and $3.0 million, representing an 19.03% effective tax rate, for the three months ended June 30, 2024. The effective tax rate for the first and second quarters of 2025 was impacted by non-deductible merger costs of $1.3 million and $357 thousand, respectively. Income tax expense for the six months ended June 30, 2025 was $6.2 million, representing a 19.49% effective tax rate, compared to $5.9 million, representing a 18.70% effective tax rate, for the six months ended June 30, 2025.

    Asset Quality

    • Total nonperforming assets were approximately $30.4 million, or 0.48% of total assets, as of June 30, 2025, compared to $56.1 million, or 0.89% of total assets, as of March 31, 2025, and $36.5 million, or 0.62% of total assets, as of June 30, 2024, as discussed in more detail above.
    • The allowance for credit losses measured as a percentage of total loans was 1.02% as of June 30, 2025, compared to 1.03% as of as of March 31, 2025, and 1.02% as of June 30, 2024. In addition, the allowance for credit losses as a percentage of nonaccrual loans was 169.52% as of June 30, 2025, compared to 87.57% and 130.88% as of March 31, 2025 and June 30, 2024, respectively. The change in the allowance for credit losses as a percentage of nonaccrual loans was primarily attributable to the levels of nonperforming assets, as discussed in more detail above.
    • The provision for credit losses was $4.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025, compared to $1.6 million and $2.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and June 30, 2024, respectively. The $2.8 million and $1.7 million increases in the provision expense for the second quarter of 2025 compared to the first quarter of 2025 and second quarter 2024, respectively, were primarily a result of increased net loan charge-offs, as discussed in more detail above, coupled with higher loan portfolio growth. The provision for credit losses was $5.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025, compared to $3.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2024. The $2.0 million increase in the provision expense for the first six months of 2025 compared to the first six months of 2024 was primarily a result of higher loan portfolio growth for the six months ended June 30, 2025 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2024, coupled with increased net loan charge-offs, as discussed above.
    • As discussed in more detail above, for the three months ended June 30, 2025, net loan charge-offs were $3.3 million, or 0.28% (annualized) of average total loans and loans held for sale, compared to $1.4 million, or 0.13% (annualized) of average total loans and loans held for sale, during the three months ended March 31, 2025, and $2.8 million, or 0.25% (annualized) of average total loans and loans held for sale, during the three months ended June 30, 2024.
    • For the six months ended June 30, 2025, net loan charge-offs were $4.7 million, or 0.21% (annualized) of average total loans and loans held for sale, compared to $4.1 million, or 0.19% (annualized) of average total loans and loans held for sale, during the six months ended June 30, 2024.

    Capital

    • As of June 30, 2025, the Corporation’s total shareholders’ equity was $637.3 million, representing an increase of $12.8 million, or 2.05% (8.20% annualized), from March 31, 2025, and an increase of $50.6 million, or 8.62%, from June 30, 2024. The changes resulted from an increase in the Corporation’s retained earnings (net income, partially offset by the common and preferred stock dividends paid) and a decrease in accumulated other comprehensive loss primarily from the after-tax impact of temporary unrealized valuation changes in the Corporation’s available-for-sale investment portfolio.
    • Regulatory capital ratios for the Corporation continue to exceed regulatory “well-capitalized” levels as of June 30, 2025, consistent with prior periods.
    • As of June 30, 2025, the Corporation’s ratio of common shareholders’ equity to total assets was 9.17% compared to 9.00% at March 31, 2025 and 8.99% at June 30, 2024. As of June 30, 2025 and March 31, 2025, the Corporation’s ratio of tangible common equity to tangible assets, a non-GAAP measure, was 8.53% and 8.36%, respectively. Excluding merger costs, the Corporation’s ratio of tangible common equity to tangible assets, a non-GAAP measure, as of June 30, 2025 was 8.56% compared to 8.38% at March 31, 2025 and 8.30% at June 30, 2024.1 The increase in the June 30, 2025 ratio of tangible common equity to tangible assets compared to March 31, 2025 and June 30, 2024 was primarily the result of a decrease in accumulated other comprehensive loss, coupled with an increase in retained earnings, as discussed above.1

    Recent Events

    • On January 10, 2025, the Corporation announced that the Corporation and CNB Bank entered into a definitive merger agreement (the “Merger Agreement”) with ESSA Bancorp, Inc. (“ESSA”) and ESSA Bank and Trust in an all-stock transaction. Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, each outstanding share of ESSA common stock will be converted into the right to receive 0.8547 shares of the Corporation’s common stock. On June 30, 2025, the Corporation and ESSA announced they have received the requisite bank regulatory approvals and waivers from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Pennsylvania Department of Banking and Securities and the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia necessary for CNB to complete its acquisition of ESSA and ESSA Bank & Trust. The transaction is currently expected to close July 23, 2025, subject to customary closing conditions.

    About CNB Financial Corporation

    CNB Financial Corporation is a financial holding company with consolidated assets of approximately $6.3 billion. CNB Financial Corporation conducts business primarily through its principal subsidiary, CNB Bank. CNB Bank is a full-service bank engaging in a full range of banking activities and services, including trust and wealth management services, for individual, business, governmental, and institutional customers. CNB Bank operations include a private banking division, one loan production office, one drive-up office, one mobile office, and 55 full-service offices in Pennsylvania, Ohio, New York, and Virginia. CNB Bank, headquartered in Clearfield, Pennsylvania, with offices in Central and North Central Pennsylvania, serves as the multi-brand parent to various divisions. These divisions include ERIEBANK, based in Erie, Pennsylvania, with offices in Northwest Pennsylvania and Northeast Ohio; FCBank, based in Worthington, Ohio, with offices in Central Ohio; BankOnBuffalo, based in Buffalo, New York, with offices in Western New York; Ridge View Bank, based in Roanoke, Virginia, with offices in the Southwest Virginia region; and Impressia Bank, a division focused on banking opportunities for women, which operates in CNB Bank’s primary market areas. Additional information about CNB Financial Corporation may be found at www.CNBBank.bank.

    Forward-Looking Statements

    This press release includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, with respect to the Corporation’s financial condition, liquidity, results of operations, future performance and business. These forward-looking statements are intended to be covered by the safe harbor for “forward-looking statements” provided by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are those that are not historical facts. Forward-looking statements include statements with respect to beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, expectations, anticipations, estimates and intentions that are subject to significant risks and uncertainties and are subject to change based on various factors (some of which are beyond the Corporation’s control). Forward-looking statements often include the words “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “forecasts,” “intends,” “plans,” “targets,” “potentially,” “probably,” “projects,” “outlook” or similar expressions or future conditional verbs such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “would” and “could.” The Corporation’s actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements, which are neither statements of historical fact nor guarantees or assurances of future performance. Such known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause the actual results to differ materially from the statements, include, but are not limited to, (i) adverse changes or conditions in capital and financial markets, including actual or potential stresses in the banking industry; (ii) changes in interest rates; (iii) the credit risks of lending activities, including our ability to estimate credit losses and the allowance for credit losses, as well as the effects of changes in the level of, and trends in, loan delinquencies and write-offs; (iv) effectiveness of our data security controls in the face of cyber attacks and any reputational risks following a cybersecurity incident; (v) changes in general business, industry or economic conditions or competition; (vi) changes in any applicable law, rule, regulation, policy, guideline or practice governing or affecting financial holding companies and their subsidiaries or with respect to tax or accounting principles or otherwise; (vii) adverse economic effects from international trade disputes, including threatened or implemented tariffs imposed by the U.S. and threatened or implemented tariffs imposed by foreign countries in retaliation, or similar events impacting economic activity; (viii) the possibility that CNB and ESSA may be unable to achieve expected synergies and operating efficiencies in the merger within the executed timeframes or at all or to successfully integrate ESSA operations and those of CNB; (ix) higher than expected costs or other difficulties related to integration of combined or merged businesses; (x) the effects of business combinations and other acquisition transactions, including the inability to realize our loan and investment portfolios; (xi) changes in the quality or composition of our loan and investment portfolios; (xii) adequacy of loan loss reserves; (xiii) increased competition; (xiv) loss of certain key officers; (xv) deposit attrition; (xvi) rapidly changing technology; (xvii) unanticipated regulatory or judicial proceedings and liabilities and other costs; (xviii) changes in the cost of funds, demand for loan products or demand for financial services; and (xix) other economic, competitive, governmental or technological factors affecting our operations, markets, products, services and prices. Such developments could have an adverse impact on the Corporation’s financial position and results of operations. For more information about factors that could cause actual results to differ from those discussed in the forward-looking statements, please refer to the “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” sections of and the forward-looking statement disclaimers in the Corporation’s annual and quarterly reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

    The forward-looking statements are based upon management’s beliefs and assumptions and are made as of the date of this press release. Factors or events that could cause the Corporation’s actual results to differ may emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for the Corporation to predict all of them. The Corporation undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements included in this press release or to update the reasons why actual results could differ from those contained in such statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except to the extent required by law. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking events discussed in this press release might not occur and you should not put undue reliance on any forward-looking statements.

    CNB FINANCIAL CORPORATION
    CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
    Unaudited
    (dollars in thousands, except per share data)

      Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended
      June 30,
    2025
      March 31,
    2025
      June 30,
    2024
      June 30,
    2025
      June 30,
    2024
    Income Statement                  
    Interest and fees on loans $ 75,408     $ 72,379     $ 72,142     $ 147,787     $ 143,655  
    Interest and dividends on securities and cash and cash equivalents   10,363       10,000       8,510       20,363       14,902  
    Interest expense   (33,574 )     (33,948 )     (34,935 )     (67,522 )     (67,618 )
    Net interest income   52,197       48,431       45,717       100,628       90,939  
    Provision for credit losses   4,338       1,556       2,591       5,894       3,911  
    Net interest income after provision for credit losses   47,859       46,875       43,126       94,734       87,028  
    Non-interest income                  
    Wealth and asset management fees   2,109       1,796       2,007       3,905       3,809  
    Service charges on deposit accounts   1,656       1,714       1,794       3,370       3,488  
    Other service charges and fees   427       510       712       937       1,407  
    Net realized gains on available-for-sale securities   —       —       —       —       —  
    Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on equity securities   567       (249 )     (80 )     318       111  
    Mortgage banking   172       96       187       268       383  
    Bank owned life insurance   976       760       784       1,736       1,551  
    Card processing and interchange income   2,278       2,107       2,187       4,385       4,203  
    Other non-interest income   823       1,773       1,274       2,596       2,868  
    Total non-interest income   9,008       8,507       8,865       17,515       17,820  
    Non-interest expenses                  
    Salaries and benefits   19,348       20,564       17,676       39,912       36,463  
    Net occupancy expense of premises   4,032       4,038       3,580       8,070       7,220  
    Technology expense   5,462       5,378       5,573       10,840       10,645  
    Advertising expense   556       514       553       1,070       1,238  
    State and local taxes   1,301       1,292       1,237       2,593       2,380  
    Legal, professional, and examination fees   997       849       1,119       1,846       2,291  
    FDIC insurance premiums   937       985       1,018       1,922       2,008  
    Card processing and interchange expenses   1,253       1,160       878       2,413       2,057  
    Merger costs   357       1,529       —       1,886       —  
    Other non-interest expense   5,374       4,729       4,355       10,103       9,111  
    Total non-interest expenses   39,617       41,038       35,989       80,655       73,413  
    Income before income taxes   17,250       14,344       16,002       31,594       31,435  
    Income tax expense   3,294       2,863       3,045       6,157       5,878  
    Net income   13,956       11,481       12,957       25,437       25,557  
    Preferred stock dividends   1,075       1,075       1,075       2,150       2,150  
    Net income available to common shareholders $ 12,881     $ 10,406     $ 11,882     $ 23,287     $ 23,407  
                       
    Ending shares outstanding   21,119,894       20,980,245       20,998,117       21,119,894       20,980,245  
    Average diluted common shares outstanding   20,952,891       20,925,388       20,893,396       20,939,424       20,890,203  
    Diluted earnings per common share $ 0.61     $ 0.50     $ 0.56     $ 1.10     $ 1.11  
    Adjusted diluted earnings per common share, net of merger costs (non-GAAP)(1) $ 0.63     $ 0.57     $ 0.56     $ 1.19     $ 1.11  
    Cash dividends per common share $ 0.180     $ 0.180     $ 0.175     $ 0.360     $ 0.350  
    Dividend payout ratio   30 %     36 %     31 %     33 %     32 %
    Adjusted dividend payout ratio, net of merger costs (non-GAAP)(1)   29 %     32 %     31 %     30 %     32 %
     

    CNB FINANCIAL CORPORATION
    CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
    Unaudited
    (dollars in thousands, except per share data)

      Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended
      June 30,
    2025
      March 31,
    2025
      June 30,
    2024
      June 30,
    2025
      June 30,
    2024
    Average Balances                  
    Total loans and loans held for sale $ 4,668,051     $ 4,591,395     $ 4,441,633     $ 4,629,956     $ 4,435,246  
    Investment securities   803,082       798,427       734,087       800,722       732,710  
    Total earning assets   5,817,121       5,803,526       5,465,645       5,810,364       5,407,954  
    Total assets   6,235,036       6,220,575       5,854,978       6,227,901       5,792,485  
    Noninterest-bearing deposits   829,328       814,441       761,270       821,927       749,124  
    Interest-bearing deposits   4,558,732       4,574,700       4,321,678       4,566,673       4,275,406  
    Shareholders’ equity   633,848       619,409       583,221       626,739       579,991  
    Tangible common shareholders’ equity (non-GAAP)(1)   532,005       517,550       481,309       524,888       478,069  
                       
    Average Yields (annualized)                  
    Total loans and loans held for sale   6.50 %     6.41 %     6.55 %     6.46 %     6.53 %
    Investment securities   2.83 %     2.75 %     2.14 %     2.79 %     2.08 %
    Total earning assets   5.89 %     5.73 %     5.89 %     5.81 %     5.85 %
    Interest-bearing deposits   2.84 %     2.89 %     3.15 %     2.87 %     3.07 %
    Interest-bearing liabilities   2.88 %     2.93 %     3.17 %     2.90 %     3.10 %
                       
    Performance Ratios (annualized)                  
    Return on average assets   0.90 %     0.75 %     0.89 %     0.82 %     0.89 %
    Adjusted return on average assets, net of merger costs (non-GAAP)(1)   0.92 %     0.85 %     0.89 %     0.88 %     0.89 %
    Return on average equity   8.83 %     7.52 %     8.94 %     8.18 %     8.86 %
    Adjusted return on average equity, net of merger costs (non-GAAP)(1)   9.06 %     8.49 %     8.94 %     8.78 %     8.86 %
    Return on average tangible common equity (non-GAAP)(1)   9.71 %     8.15 %     9.93 %     8.95 %     9.85 %
    Adjusted return on average tangible common equity (non-GAAP)(1)   9.98 %     9.32 %     9.93 %     9.66 %     9.85 %
    Net interest margin, fully tax equivalent basis (non-GAAP)(1)   3.59 %     3.37 %     3.34 %     3.48 %     3.36 %
    Efficiency ratio, fully tax equivalent basis (non-GAAP)(1)   64.08 %     71.28 %     65.20 %     67.55 %     66.74 %
    Adjusted efficiency ratio, fully tax equivalent basis (non-GAAP)(1)   63.50 %     68.62 %     65.20 %     65.97 %     66.74 %
                       
    Net Loan Charge-Offs                  
    CNB Bank net loan charge-offs $ 2,848     $ 926     $ 2,348     $ 3,774     $ 3,226  
    Holiday Financial net loan charge-offs   455       513       456       968       922  
    Total Corporation net loan charge-offs $ 3,303     $ 1,439     $ 2,804     $ 4,742     $ 4,148  
    Annualized net loan charge-offs / average total loans and loans held for sale   0.28 %     0.13 %     0.25 %     0.21 %     0.19 %
     

    CNB FINANCIAL CORPORATION
    CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
    Unaudited
    (dollars in thousands, except per share data)

      June 30,
    2025
      March 31,
    2025
      June 30,
    2024
    Ending Balance Sheet          
    Cash and due from banks $ 88,721     $ 68,745     $ 56,031  
    Interest-bearing deposits with Federal Reserve   332,214       447,053       271,943  
    Interest-bearing deposits with other financial institutions   4,476       4,359       3,171  
    Total cash and cash equivalents   425,411       520,157       331,145  
    Debt securities available-for-sale, at fair value   523,198       516,412       359,900  
    Debt securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost   270,032       282,159       354,569  
    Equity securities   10,937       10,293       9,654  
    Loans held for sale   833       860       642  
    Loans receivable          
    Syndicated loans   78,936       69,189       53,938  
    Loans   4,654,484       4,540,820       4,425,754  
    Total loans receivable   4,733,420       4,610,009       4,479,692  
    Less: allowance for credit losses   (48,329 )     (47,357 )     (45,532 )
    Net loans receivable   4,685,091       4,562,652       4,434,160  
    Goodwill and other intangibles   43,874       43,874       43,874  
    Core deposit intangible   173       190       241  
    Other assets   358,928       358,911       352,386  
    Total Assets $ 6,318,477     $ 6,295,508     $ 5,886,571  
               
    Noninterest-bearing demand deposits $ 855,788     $ 842,398     $ 762,918  
    Interest-bearing demand deposits   698,902       719,460       693,074  
    Savings   3,162,515       3,160,618       3,140,505  
    Certificates of deposit   749,877       737,602       514,348  
    Total deposits   5,467,082       5,460,078       5,110,845  
    Subordinated debentures   20,620       20,620       20,620  
    Subordinated notes, net of issuance costs   84,722       84,646       84,419  
    Other liabilities   108,772       105,656       83,987  
    Total liabilities   5,681,196       5,671,000       5,299,871  
    Common stock   —       —       —  
    Preferred stock   57,785       57,785       57,785  
    Additional paid in capital   218,375       220,254       218,756  
    Retained earnings   397,004       387,925       361,987  
    Treasury stock   (2,420 )     (4,944 )     (4,438 )
    Accumulated other comprehensive loss   (33,463 )     (36,512 )     (47,390 )
    Total shareholders’ equity   637,281       624,508       586,700  
    Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity $ 6,318,477     $ 6,295,508     $ 5,886,571  
               
    Book value per common share $ 27.44     $ 27.01     $ 25.19  
    Adjusted book value per common share (non-GAAP)(1) $ 27.53     $ 27.08     $ 25.19  
    Tangible book value per common share (non-GAAP)(1) $ 25.35     $ 24.91     $ 23.09  
    Adjusted tangible book value per common share (non-GAAP)(1) $ 25.44     $ 24.98     $ 23.09  
                           

    CNB FINANCIAL CORPORATION
    CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
    Unaudited
    (dollars in thousands, except per share data)

      June 30,
    2025
      March 31,
    2025
      June 30,
    2024
    Capital Ratios          
    Tangible common equity / tangible assets (non-GAAP)(1)   8.53 %     8.36 %     8.30 %
    Adjusted tangible common equity / tangible assets (non-GAAP)(1)   8.56 %     8.38 %     8.30 %
    Tier 1 leverage ratio(2)   10.42 %     10.27 %     10.56 %
    Common equity tier 1 ratio(2)   11.78 %     11.85 %     11.71 %
    Tier 1 risk-based ratio(2)   13.38 %     13.50 %     13.41 %
    Total risk-based ratio(2)   16.14 %     16.30 %     16.20 %
               
    Asset Quality Detail          
    Nonaccrual loans $ 28,509     $ 54,079     $ 34,788  
    Loans 90+ days past due and accruing   256       308       112  
    Total nonperforming loans   28,765       54,387       34,900  
    Other real estate owned   1,624       1,664       1,641  
    Total nonperforming assets $ 30,389     $ 56,051     $ 36,541  
               
    Asset Quality Ratios          
    Nonperforming assets / Total loans + OREO   0.64 %     1.22 %     0.82 %
    Nonperforming assets / Total assets   0.48 %     0.89 %     0.62 %
    Ratio of allowance for credit losses on loans to nonaccrual loans   169.52 %     87.57 %     130.88 %
    Allowance for credit losses / Total loans   1.02 %     1.03 %     1.02 %
               
               
    Consolidated Financial Data Notes:          
    (1) Management uses non-GAAP financial information in its analysis of the Corporation’s performance. Management believes that these non-GAAP measures provide a greater understanding of ongoing operations, enhance comparability of results of operations with prior periods and show the effects of significant gains and charges in the periods presented. The Corporation’s management believes that investors may use these non-GAAP measures to analyze the Corporation’s financial performance without the impact of unusual items or events that may obscure trends in the Corporation’s underlying performance. This non-GAAP data should be considered in addition to results prepared in accordance with GAAP, and is not a substitute for, or superior to, GAAP results. Limitations associated with non-GAAP financial measures include the risks that persons might disagree as to the appropriateness of items included in these measures and that different companies might calculate these measures differently. A reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures is provided below (dollars in thousands, except per share data).
    (2) Capital ratios as of June 30, 2025 are estimated pending final regulatory filings.
     

    CNB FINANCIAL CORPORATION
    CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
    Unaudited
    (dollars in thousands, except per share data)

      Average Balances, Income and Interest Rates on a Taxable Equivalent Basis
      Three Months Ended,
      June 30, 2025   March 31, 2025   June 30, 2024
      Average
    Balance
      Annual
    Rate
      Interest
    Inc./Exp.
      Average
    Balance
      Annual
    Rate
      Interest
    Inc./Exp.
      Average
    Balance
      Annual
    Rate
      Interest
    Inc./Exp.
    ASSETS:                                  
    Securities:                                  
    Taxable(1) (4) $ 771,152     2.82 %   $ 5,696   $ 765,654     2.73 %   $ 5,461   $ 702,036     2.09 %   $ 3,941
    Tax-exempt(1) (2) (4)   24,260     2.64       174     25,345     2.69       181     25,088     2.59       178
    Equity securities(1) (2)   7,670     5.44       104     7,428     5.84       107     6,963     5.72       99
    Total securities(4)   803,082     2.83       5,974     798,427     2.75       5,749     734,087     2.14       4,218
    Loans receivable:                                  
    Commercial(2) (3)   1,473,560     6.71       24,664     1,466,323     6.74       24,369     1,416,476     6.85       24,133
    Commercial & residential mortgages and loans held for sale(2) (3)   3,068,519     6.18       47,295     3,001,317     6.02       44,572     2,897,473     6.15       44,331
    Consumer(3)   125,972     11.72       3,681     123,755     12.01       3,665     127,684     12.17       3,863
    Total loans receivable(3)   4,668,051     6.50       75,640     4,591,395     6.41       72,606     4,441,633     6.55       72,327
    Interest-bearing deposits with the Federal Reserve and other financial institutions   345,988     5.13       4,422     413,704     4.20       4,284     289,925     5.99       4,321
    Total earning assets   5,817,121     5.89     $ 86,036     5,803,526     5.73     $ 82,639     5,465,645     5.89     $ 80,866
    Noninterest-bearing assets:                                  
    Cash and due from banks   58,530               58,152               53,710          
    Premises and equipment   129,093               129,188               112,386          
    Other assets   277,241               277,051               268,930          
    Allowance for credit losses   (46,949 )             (47,342 )             (45,693 )        
    Total non interest-bearing assets   417,915               417,049               389,333          
    TOTAL ASSETS $ 6,235,036             $ 6,220,575             $ 5,854,978          
    LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY:                                  
    Demand—interest-bearing $ 707,932     0.97 %   $ 1,719   $ 704,874     0.88 %   $ 1,527   $ 713,431     0.76 %   $ 1,342
    Savings   3,107,520     3.01       23,286     3,131,697     3.09       23,840     3,097,598     3.57       27,464
    Time   743,280     3.92       7,271     738,129     3.99       7,267     510,649     3.93       4,988
    Total interest-bearing deposits   4,558,732     2.84       32,276     4,574,700     2.89       32,634     4,321,678     3.15       33,794
    Short-term borrowings   —     —       —     —     —       —     —     0.00       —
    Finance lease liabilities   16,861     5.28       222     15,143     6.32       236     259     4.66       3
    Subordinated notes and debentures   105,304     4.10       1,076     105,228     4.15       1,078     105,001     4.36       1,138
    Total interest-bearing liabilities   4,680,897     2.88     $ 33,574     4,695,071     2.93     $ 33,948     4,426,938     3.17     $ 34,935
    Demand—noninterest-bearing   829,328               814,441               761,270          
    Other liabilities   90,963               91,654               83,549          
    Total Liabilities   5,601,188               5,601,166               5,271,757          
    Shareholders’ equity   633,848               619,409               583,221          
    TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY $ 6,235,036             $ 6,220,575             $ 5,854,978          
    Interest income/Earning assets     5.89 %   $ 86,036       5.73 %   $ 82,639       5.89 %   $ 80,866
    Interest expense/Interest-bearing liabilities     2.88       33,574       2.93       33,948       3.17       34,935
    Net interest spread     3.01 %   $ 52,462       2.80 %   $ 48,691       2.72 %   $ 45,931
    Interest income/Earning assets     5.89 %     86,036       5.73 %     82,639       5.89 %     80,866
    Interest expense/Earning assets     2.30       33,574       2.36       33,948       2.55       34,935
    Net interest margin (fully tax-equivalent)     3.59 %   $ 52,462       3.37 %   $ 48,691       3.34 %   $ 45,931
    (1 ) Includes unamortized discounts and premiums.
    (2 ) Average yields are stated on a fully taxable equivalent basis (calculated using statutory rates of 21%) resulting from tax-free municipal securities in the investment portfolio and tax-free municipal loans in the commercial loan portfolio. The taxable equivalent adjustment to net interest income for the three months ended June 30, 2025, March 31, 2025 and June 30, 2024 was $265 thousand, $260 thousand and $214 thousand, respectively.
    (3 ) Average loans receivable outstanding includes the average balance outstanding of all nonaccrual loans. Loans receivable consist of the average of total loans receivable less average unearned income. In addition, loans receivable interest income consists of loans receivable fees, including PPP deferred processing fees.
    (4 ) Average balance is computed using the fair value of AFS securities and amortized cost of HTM securities. Average yield has been computed using amortized cost average balance for AFS and HTM securities. The adjustment to the average balance for securities in the calculation of average yield for the three months ended June 30, 2025, March 31, 2025 and June 30, 2024 was $(42.6) million, $(48.1) million and $(59.2) million, respectively.
       

    CNB FINANCIAL CORPORATION
    CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
    Unaudited
    (dollars in thousands, except per share data)

      Average Balances, Income and Interest Rates on a Taxable Equivalent Basis
      Six Months Ended,
      June 30, 2025   June 30, 2024
      Average
    Balance
      Annual
    Rate
      Interest
    Inc./Exp.
      Average
    Balance
      Annual
    Rate
      Interest
    Inc./Exp.
    ASSETS:                      
    Securities:                      
    Taxable(1) (4) $ 768,379     2.77 %   $ 11,157   $ 699,431     2.02 %   $ 7,592
    Tax-exempt(1) (2) (4)   24,800     2.66       354     26,415     2.59       369
    Equity securities(1) (2)   7,543     5.64       211     6,864     5.68       194
    Total securities(4)   800,722     2.79       11,722     732,710     2.08       8,155
    Loans receivable:                      
    Commercial(2) (3)   1,469,962     6.73       49,033     1,423,097     6.88       48,652
    Commercial & residential mortgages and loans held for sale(2) (3)   3,035,103     6.10       91,868     2,883,824     6.12       87,734
    Consumer(3)   124,891     11.86       7,346     128,325     11.97       7,641
    Total loans receivable(3)   4,629,956     6.46       148,247     4,435,246     6.53       144,027
    Interest-bearing deposits with the Federal Reserve and other financial institutions   379,686     4.62       8,706     239,998     5.70       6,806
    Total earning assets   5,810,364     5.81     $ 168,675     5,407,954     5.85     $ 158,988
    Noninterest-bearing assets:                      
    Cash and due from banks   58,337               53,611          
    Premises and equipment   129,141               111,199          
    Other assets   277,203               265,453          
    Allowance for credit losses   (47,144 )             (45,732 )        
    Total non interest-bearing assets   417,537               384,531          
    TOTAL ASSETS $ 6,227,901             $ 5,792,485          
    LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY:                      
    Demand—interest-bearing $ 706,412     0.93 %   $ 3,246   $ 726,681     0.70 %   $ 2,537
    Savings   3,119,542     3.05       47,126     3,031,438     3.52       53,075
    Time   740,719     3.96       14,538     517,287     3.78       9,730
    Total interest-bearing deposits   4,566,673     2.87       64,910     4,275,406     3.07       65,342
    Short-term borrowings   —     —       —     —     —       —
    Finance lease liabilities   16,005     5.77       458     271     4.45       6
    Subordinated notes and debentures   105,266     4.13       2,154     104,963     4.35       2,270
    Total interest-bearing liabilities   4,687,944     2.90     $ 67,522     4,380,640     3.10     $ 67,618
    Demand—noninterest-bearing   821,927               749,124          
    Other liabilities   91,291               82,730          
    Total Liabilities   5,601,162               5,212,494          
    Shareholders’ equity   626,739               579,991          
    TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY $ 6,227,901             $ 5,792,485          
    Interest income/Earning assets     5.81 %   $ 168,675       5.85 %   $ 158,988
    Interest expense/Interest-bearing liabilities     2.90       67,522       3.10       67,618
    Net interest spread     2.91 %   $ 101,153       2.75 %   $ 91,370
    Interest income/Earning assets     5.81 %     168,675       5.85 %     158,988
    Interest expense/Earning assets     2.33       67,522       2.49       67,618
    Net interest margin (fully tax-equivalent)     3.48 %   $ 101,153       3.36 %   $ 91,370
    (1 ) Includes unamortized discounts and premiums.
    (2 ) Average yields are stated on a fully taxable equivalent basis (calculated using statutory rates of 21%) resulting from tax-free municipal securities in the investment portfolio and tax-free municipal loans in the commercial loan portfolio. The taxable equivalent adjustment to net interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2025 and 2024, was $525 thousand and $431 thousand, respectively.
    (3 ) Average loans receivable outstanding includes the average balance outstanding of all nonaccrual loans. Loans receivable consist of the average of total loans receivable less average unearned income. In addition, loans receivable interest income consists of loans receivable fees, including PPP deferred processing fees.
    (4 ) Average balance is computed using the fair value of AFS securities and amortized cost of HTM securities. Average yield has been computed using amortized cost average balance for AFS and HTM securities. The adjustment to the average balance for securities in the calculation of average yield for the six months ended June 30, 2025 and 2024 was $(45.3) million and $(57.2) million, respectively.
       

     

    CNB FINANCIAL CORPORATION
    CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
    Unaudited
    (dollars in thousands, except per share data)

    Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures

      Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended
      June 30,
    2025
      March 31,
    2025
      June 30,
    2024
      June 30,
    2025
      June 30,
    2024
    Calculation of merger costs, net of tax (non-GAAP):                  
    Merger costs – non deductible $ 357     $ 1,327     $ —     $ 1,684     $ —  
                       
    Merger costs – deductible   —       202       —       202       —  
    Statutory federal tax rate   21 %     21 %     21 %     21 %     21 %
    Tax benefit of merger costs (non-GAAP)   —       42       —       42       —  
    Merger costs – deductible, net of tax   —       160       —       160       —  
                       
    Merger costs, net of tax (non-GAAP) $ 357     $ 1,487     $ —     $ 1,844     $ —  
      Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended
      June 30,
    2025
      March 31,
    2025
      June 30,
    2024
      June 30,
    2025
      June 30,
    2024
    Calculation of net income available to common (GAAP):                  
    Net income $ 13,956   $ 11,481   $ 12,957   $ 25,437   $ 25,557
    Less: preferred stock dividends   1,075     1,075     1,075     2,150     2,150
    Net income available to common shareholders $ 12,881   $ 10,406   $ 11,882   $ 23,287   $ 23,407
                       
    Adjusted calculation of net income available to common (non-GAAP):                  
    Net income available to common shareholders $ 12,881   $ 10,406   $ 11,882   $ 23,287   $ 23,407
    Add: Merger costs, net of tax (non-GAAP)   357     1,487     —     1,844     —
    Adjusted net income available to common shareholders (non-GAAP) $ 13,238   $ 11,893   $ 11,882   $ 25,131   $ 23,407
      Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended
      June 30,
    2025
      March 31,
    2025
      June 30,
    2024
      June 30,
    2025
      June 30,
    2024
    Calculation of PPNR (non-GAAP):(1)                  
    Net interest income $ 52,197   $ 48,431   $ 45,717   $ 100,628   $ 90,939
    Add: Non-interest income   9,008     8,507     8,865     17,515     17,820
    Less: Non-interest expense   39,617     41,038     35,989     80,655     73,413
    PPNR (non-GAAP) $ 21,588   $ 15,900   $ 18,593   $ 37,488   $ 35,346
                       
    Adjusted calculation of PPNR (non-GAAP):(1)                  
    Net interest income $ 52,197   $ 48,431   $ 45,717   $ 100,628   $ 90,939
    Add: Non-interest income   9,008     8,507     8,865     17,515     17,820
    Less: Non-interest expense   39,617     41,038     35,989     80,655     73,413
    Add: Merger costs   357     1,529     —     1,886     —
    Adjusted PPNR (non-GAAP) $ 21,945   $ 17,429   $ 18,593   $ 39,374   $ 35,346
                       
    (1) Management believes that this is an important metric as it illustrates the underlying performance of the Corporation, it enables investors and others to assess the Corporation’s ability to generate capital to cover credit losses through the credit cycle and provides consistent reporting with a key metric used by bank regulatory agencies.
     

    CNB FINANCIAL CORPORATION
    CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
    Unaudited
    (dollars in thousands, except per share data)

    Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures

      Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended
      June 30,
    2025
      March 31,
    2025
      June 30,
    2024
      June 30,
    2025
      June 30,
    2024
    Basic earnings per common share computation:                  
    Net income available to common shareholders $ 12,881   $ 10,406   $ 11,882   $ 23,287   $ 23,407
    Less: net income available to common shareholders allocated to participating securities   120     57     101     199     192
    Net income available to common shareholders allocated to common stock $ 12,761   $ 10,349   $ 11,781   $ 23,088   $ 23,215
                       
    Weighted average common shares outstanding, including shares considered participating securities   21,053     20,981     21,005     21,018     20,992
    Less: Average participating securities   172     114     174     144     165
    Weighted average shares   20,881     20,867     20,831     20,874     20,827
    Basic earnings per common share $ 0.61   $ 0.50   $ 0.57   $ 1.11   $ 1.12
                       
    Diluted earnings per common share computation:                  
    Net income available to common shareholders allocated to common stock $ 12,761   $ 10,349   $ 11,781   $ 23,088   $ 23,215
                       
    Weighted average common shares outstanding for basic earnings per common share   20,881     20,867     20,831     20,874     20,827
    Add: Dilutive effect of stock compensation   72     58     62     65     63
    Weighted average shares and dilutive potential common shares   20,953     20,925     20,893     20,939     20,890
    Diluted earnings per common share $ 0.61   $ 0.50   $ 0.56   $ 1.10   $ 1.11
                       
    Adjusted basic earnings per common share computation (non-GAAP):                  
    Net income available to common shareholders $ 12,881   $ 10,406   $ 11,882   $ 23,287   $ 23,407
    Add: Merger costs, net of tax (non-GAAP)   357     1,487     —     1,844     —
    Less: net income available to common shareholders allocated to participating securities   120     57     101     199     192
    Less: Adjustment to net income available to common shareholders allocated to participating securities for merger cost impact, net of tax (non-GAAP)   3     8     —     12     —
    Adjusted net income available to common shareholders allocated to common stock (non-GAAP) $ 13,115   $ 11,828   $ 11,781   $ 24,920   $ 23,215
                       
    Weighted average common shares outstanding, including shares considered participating securities   21,053     20,981     21,005     21,018     20,992
    Less: Average participating securities   172     114     174     144     165
    Weighted average shares   20,881     20,867     20,831     20,874     20,827
    Adjusted basic earnings per common share (non-GAAP) $ 0.63   $ 0.57   $ 0.57   $ 1.19   $ 1.12
                       
    Adjusted diluted earnings per common share computation (non-GAAP):                  
    Adjusted net income available to common shareholders allocated to common stock (non-GAAP) $ 13,115   $ 11,828   $ 11,781   $ 24,920   $ 23,215
                       
    Weighted average common shares outstanding for basic earnings per common share   20,881     20,867     20,831     20,874     20,827
    Add: Dilutive effect of stock compensation   72     58     62     65     63
    Weighted average shares and dilutive potential common shares   20,953     20,925     20,893     20,939     20,890
    Adjusted diluted earnings per common share (non-GAAP) $ 0.63   $ 0.57   $ 0.56   $ 1.19   $ 1.11
                                 

    CNB FINANCIAL CORPORATION
    CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
    Unaudited
    (dollars in thousands, except per share data)

    Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures

      Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended
      June 30,
    2025
      March 31,
    2025
      June 30,
    2024
      June 30,
    2025
      June 30,
    2024
    Calculation of dividend payout ratio:                  
    Cash dividends per common share $ 0.180     $ 0.180     $ 0.175     $ 0.360     $ 0.350  
    Diluted earnings per common share   0.61       0.50       0.56       1.10       1.11  
    Dividend payout ratio   30 %     36 %     31 %     33 %     32 %
                       
    Adjusted calculation of dividend payout ratio (non-GAAP):                  
    Cash dividends per common share $ 0.180     $ 0.180     $ 0.175     $ 0.360     $ 0.350  
    Adjusted diluted earnings per common share (non-GAAP)   0.63       0.57       0.56       1.19       1.11  
    Adjusted dividend payout ratio (non-GAAP)   29 %     32 %     31 %     30 %     32 %
      Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended
      June 30,
    2025
      March 31,
    2025
      June 30,
    2024
      June 30,
    2025
      June 30,
    2024
    Calculation of net interest margin:                  
    Interest income $ 85,771     $ 82,379     $ 80,652     $ 168,150     $ 158,557  
    Interest expense   33,574       33,948       34,935       67,522       67,618  
    Net interest income $ 52,197     $ 48,431     $ 45,717     $ 100,628     $ 90,939  
                       
    Average total earning assets $ 5,817,121     $ 5,803,526     $ 5,465,645     $ 5,810,364     $ 5,407,954  
                       
    Net interest margin (GAAP) (annualized)   3.60 %     3.38 %     3.36 %     3.49 %     3.38 %
                       
    Calculation of net interest margin (fully tax equivalent basis) (non-GAAP):                  
    Interest income $ 85,771     $ 82,379     $ 80,652     $ 168,150     $ 158,557  
    Tax equivalent adjustment (non-GAAP)   265       260       214       525       431  
    Adjusted interest income (fully tax equivalent basis) (non-GAAP)   86,036       82,639       80,866       168,675       158,988  
    Interest expense   33,574       33,948       34,935       67,522       67,618  
    Net interest income (fully tax equivalent basis) (non-GAAP) $ 52,462     $ 48,691     $ 45,931     $ 101,153     $ 91,370  
                       
    Average total earning assets $ 5,817,121     $ 5,803,526     $ 5,465,645     $ 5,810,364     $ 5,407,954  
    Less: average mark to market adjustment on investments (non-GAAP)   (42,592 )     (48,070 )     (59,225 )     (45,317 )     (57,186 )
    Adjusted average total earning assets, net of mark to market (non-GAAP) $ 5,859,713     $ 5,851,596     $ 5,524,870     $ 5,855,681     $ 5,465,140  
                       
    Net interest margin, fully tax equivalent basis (non-GAAP) (annualized)   3.59 %     3.37 %     3.34 %     3.48 %     3.36 %
                                           

    CNB FINANCIAL CORPORATION
    CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
    Unaudited
    (dollars in thousands, except per share data)

    Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures

      June 30,
    2025
      March 31,
    2025
      June 30,
    2024
    Calculation of tangible book value per common share and tangible common
    equity / tangible assets (non-GAAP):
             
    Shareholders’ equity $ 637,281     $ 624,508     $ 586,700  
    Less: preferred equity   57,785       57,785       57,785  
    Common shareholders’ equity   579,496       566,723       528,915  
    Less: goodwill and other intangibles   43,874       43,874       43,874  
    Less: core deposit intangible   173       190       241  
    Tangible common equity (non-GAAP) $ 535,449     $ 522,659     $ 484,800  
               
    Total assets $ 6,318,477     $ 6,295,508     $ 5,886,571  
    Less: goodwill and other intangibles   43,874       43,874       43,874  
    Less: core deposit intangible   173       190       241  
    Tangible assets (non-GAAP) $ 6,274,430     $ 6,251,444     $ 5,842,456  
               
    Ending shares outstanding   21,119,894       20,980,245       20,998,117  
               
    Book value per common share (GAAP) $ 27.44     $ 27.01     $ 25.19  
    Tangible book value per common share (non-GAAP) $ 25.35     $ 24.91     $ 23.09  
               
    Common shareholders’ equity / Total assets (GAAP)   9.17 %     9.00 %     8.99 %
    Tangible common equity / Tangible assets (non-GAAP)   8.53 %     8.36 %     8.30 %
               
    Adjusted calculation of book value per common share (non-GAAP):          
    Common shareholders’ equity $ 579,496     $ 566,723     $ 528,915  
    Add: Merger costs, net of tax (non-GAAP)   1,844       1,487       —  
    Adjusted common shareholders’ equity (non-GAAP) $ 581,340     $ 568,210     $ 528,915  
               
    Ending shares outstanding   21,119,894       20,980,245       20,998,117  
               
    Adjusted book value per common share (non-GAAP) $ 27.53     $ 27.08     $ 25.19  
               
    Adjusted calculation of tangible book value per common share (non-GAAP):          
    Tangible common equity (non-GAAP) $ 535,449     $ 522,659     $ 484,800  
    Add: Merger costs, net of tax (non-GAAP)   1,844       1,487       —  
    Adjusted tangible common equity (non-GAAP) $ 537,293     $ 524,146     $ 484,800  
               
    Ending shares outstanding   21,119,894       20,980,245       20,998,117  
               
    Adjusted tangible book value per common share (non-GAAP) $ 25.44     $ 24.98     $ 23.09  
               
    Adjusted calculation of tangible common equity / tangible assets (non-GAAP):          
    Adjusted common shareholders’ equity (non-GAAP) $ 537,293     $ 524,146     $ 484,800  
               
    Tangible assets (non-GAAP) $ 6,274,430     $ 6,251,444     $ 5,842,456  
    Add: Merger costs (non-GAAP)   1,886       1,529       —  
    Adjusted tangible assets (non-GAAP) $ 6,276,316     $ 6,252,973     $ 5,842,456  
               
    Adjusted tangible common equity / Adjusted tangible assets (non-GAAP)   8.56 %     8.38 %     8.30 %
     

    CNB FINANCIAL CORPORATION
    CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
    Unaudited
    (dollars in thousands, except per share data)

    Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures

      Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended
      June 30,
    2025
      March 31,
    2025
      June 30,
    2024
      June 30,
    2025
      June 30,
    2024
    Calculation of efficiency ratio:                  
    Non-interest expense $ 39,617     $ 41,038     $ 35,989     $ 80,655     $ 73,413  
                       
    Non-interest income $ 9,008     $ 8,507     $ 8,865     $ 17,515     $ 17,820  
    Net interest income   52,197       48,431       45,717       100,628       90,939  
    Total revenue $ 61,205     $ 56,938     $ 54,582     $ 118,143     $ 108,759  
    Efficiency ratio   64.73 %     72.07 %     65.94 %     68.27 %     67.50 %
                       
    Calculation of efficiency ratio (fully tax equivalent basis) (non-GAAP):                  
    Non-interest expense $ 39,617     $ 41,038     $ 35,989     $ 80,655     $ 73,413  
    Less: core deposit intangible amortization   16       17       19       33       39  
    Adjusted non-interest expense (non-GAAP) $ 39,601     $ 41,021     $ 35,970     $ 80,622     $ 73,374  
                       
    Non-interest income $ 9,008     $ 8,507     $ 8,865     $ 17,515     $ 17,820  
                       
    Net interest income $ 52,197     $ 48,431     $ 45,717     $ 100,628     $ 90,939  
    Less: tax exempt investment and loan income, net of TEFRA (non-GAAP)   1,451       1,464       1,318       2,915       2,655  
    Add: tax exempt investment and loan income (fully tax equivalent basis) (non-GAAP)   2,046       2,076       1,902       4,122       3,834  
    Adjusted net interest income (fully tax equivalent basis) (non-GAAP)   52,792       49,043       46,301       101,835       92,118  
    Adjusted net revenue (fully tax equivalent basis) (non-GAAP) $ 61,800     $ 57,550     $ 55,166     $ 119,350     $ 109,938  
                       
    Efficiency ratio (fully tax equivalent basis) (non-GAAP)   64.08 %     71.28 %     65.20 %     67.55 %     66.74 %
                       
    Adjusted calculation of efficiency ratio (fully tax equivalent basis) (non-GAAP):                  
    Adjusted non-interest expense (non-GAAP) $ 39,601     $ 41,021     $ 35,970     $ 80,622     $ 73,374  
    Less: Merger costs (non-GAAP)   357       1,529       —       1,886       —  
    Adjusted non-interest expense (non-GAAP) $ 39,244     $ 39,492     $ 35,970     $ 78,736     $ 73,374  
                       
    Adjusted net revenue (fully tax equivalent basis) (non-GAAP) $ 61,800     $ 57,550     $ 55,166     $ 119,350     $ 109,938  
                       
    Adjusted efficiency ratio (fully tax equivalent basis) (non-GAAP)   63.50 %     68.62 %     65.20 %     65.97 %     66.74 %
                                           

    CNB FINANCIAL CORPORATION
    CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
    Unaudited
    (dollars in thousands, except per share data)

    Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures

      Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended
      June 30,
    2025
      March 31,
    2025
      June 30,
    2024
      June 30,
    2025
      June 30,
    2024
    Calculation of return on average assets:                  
    Net income $ 13,956     $ 11,481     $ 12,957     $ 25,437     $ 25,557  
    Average total assets $ 6,235,036     $ 6,220,575     $ 5,854,978     $ 6,227,901     $ 5,792,485  
                       
    Return on average assets (GAAP) (annualized)   0.90 %     0.75 %     0.89 %     0.82 %     0.89 %
                       
    Adjusted calculation of return on average assets (non-GAAP):                  
    Net income $ 13,956     $ 11,481     $ 12,957     $ 25,437     $ 25,557  
    Add: Merger costs, net of tax (non-GAAP)   357       1,487       —       1,844       —  
    Adjusted net income $ 14,313     $ 12,968     $ 12,957     $ 27,281     $ 25,557  
    Average total assets $ 6,235,036     $ 6,220,575     $ 5,854,978     $ 6,227,901     $ 5,792,485  
                       
    Adjusted return on average assets (non-GAAP) (annualized)   0.92 %     0.85 %     0.89 %     0.88 %     0.89 %
      June 30,
    2025
      March 31,
    2025
      June 30,
    2024
    Calculation of total deposits          
    Total deposits $ 5,467,082   $ 5,460,078   $ 5,110,845
               
    Adjusted calculation of total deposits (non-GAAP):          
    Total deposits $ 5,467,082   $ 5,460,078   $ 5,110,845
    Add: High cost municipal deposits   77,690     —     —
    Adjusted total deposits (non-GAAP) $ 5,544,772   $ 5,460,078   $ 5,110,845
     

    CNB FINANCIAL CORPORATION
    CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
    Unaudited
    (dollars in thousands, except per share data)

    Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures

      Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended
      June 30,
    2025
      March 31,
    2025
      June 30,
    2024
      June 30,
    2025
      June 30,
    2024
    Calculation of return on average tangible common equity (non-GAAP):                  
    Net income $ 13,956     $ 11,481     $ 12,957     $ 25,437     $ 25,557  
    Less: preferred stock dividends   1,075       1,075       1,075       2,150       2,150  
    Net income available to common shareholders $ 12,881     $ 10,406     $ 11,882     $ 23,287     $ 23,407  
                       
    Average shareholders’ equity $ 633,848     $ 619,409     $ 583,221     $ 626,739     $ 579,991  
    Less: average goodwill & intangibles   44,058       44,074       44,127       44,066       44,137  
    Less: average preferred equity   57,785       57,785       57,785       57,785       57,785  
    Average tangible common shareholders’ equity (non-GAAP) $ 532,005     $ 517,550     $ 481,309     $ 524,888     $ 478,069  
                       
    Return on average equity (GAAP) (annualized)   8.83 %     7.52 %     8.94 %     8.18 %     8.86 %
    Return on average common equity (GAAP) (annualized)   8.97 %     7.51 %     9.10 %     8.25 %     9.01 %
    Return on average tangible common equity (non-GAAP) (annualized)   9.71 %     8.15 %     9.93 %     8.95 %     9.85 %
                       
    Adjusted calculation of return on average equity (non-GAAP):                  
    Net income $ 13,956     $ 11,481     $ 12,957     $ 25,437     $ 25,557  
    Add: Merger costs, net of tax (non-GAAP)   357       1,487       —       1,844       —  
    Adjusted net income (non-GAAP) $ 14,313     $ 12,968     $ 12,957     $ 27,281     $ 25,557  
                       
    Average shareholders’ equity $ 633,848     $ 619,409     $ 583,221     $ 626,739     $ 579,991  
                       
    Adjusted return on average equity (non-GAAP) (annualized)   9.06 %     8.49 %     8.94 %     8.78 %     8.86 %
                       
    Adjusted calculation of return on average tangible common equity (non-GAAP):                  
    Net income available to common shareholders $ 12,881     $ 10,406     $ 11,882     $ 23,287     $ 23,407  
    Add: Merger costs, net of tax (non-GAAP)   357       1,487       —       1,844       —  
    Adjusted net income available to common shareholders $ 13,238     $ 11,893     $ 11,882     $ 25,131     $ 23,407  
                       
    Average tangible common shareholders’ equity (non-GAAP) $ 532,005     $ 517,550     $ 481,309     $ 524,888     $ 478,069  
                       
    Adjusted return on average tangible common equity (non-GAAP) (annualized)   9.98 %     9.32 %     9.93 %     9.66 %     9.85 %

    The MIL Network –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Western New England Bancorp, Inc. Reports Results for Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2025 and Declares Quarterly Cash Dividend

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    WESTFIELD, Mass., July 22, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Western New England Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company” or “WNEB”) (NasdaqGS: WNEB), the holding company for Westfield Bank (the “Bank”), announced today the unaudited results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025. For the three months ended June 30, 2025, the Company reported net income of $4.6 million, or $0.23 per diluted share, compared to net income of $3.5 million, or $0.17 per diluted share, for the three months ended June 30, 2024. On a linked quarter basis, net income was $4.6 million, or $0.23 per diluted share, as compared to net income of $2.3 million, or $0.11 per diluted share, for the three months ended March 31, 2025. For the six months ended June 30, 2025, net income was $6.9 million, or $0.34 per diluted share, compared to net income of $6.5 million, or $0.31 per diluted share, for the six months ended June 30, 2024.

    The Company also announced that its Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.07 per share on the Company’s common stock. The dividend will be payable on or about August 20, 2025 to shareholders of record on August 6, 2025.

    James C. Hagan, President and Chief Executive Officer, commented, “We are pleased to report solid earnings for the second quarter of 2025, along with strong overall loan growth and core deposit growth. Core deposits increased $81.4 million, or 5.2%, since year-end, which will be beneficial as we continue to lower deposit costs and reduce our reliance on time deposits. We are also pleased to report that our commercial and industrial loan portfolio increased $22.8 million, or 10.8%, during the six months ended June 30, 2025, and our residential real estate portfolio increased $29.7 million, or 3.8%, during the same period. Growth in commercial and industrial loans is a strategic priority for the Company as we remain focused on meeting the needs of our business and commercial customers.

    We believe our balance sheet structure will continue to have a positive impact on earnings in the current interest rate environment. Net interest income increased $2.1 million, or 13.6%, from the three months ended March 31, 2025 to the three months ended June 30, 2025, while the net interest margin increased 31 basis points from 2.49% to 2.80% during the same period. Our loan growth and disciplined approach to managing funding costs have allowed us to expand our net interest margin as we continue to decrease the cost of interest-bearing liabilities and our reliance on time deposits. Our asset quality remains solid, with nonperforming assets to total assets of 0.21%, and total delinquency as a percentage of total loans of 0.18%.”

    Hagan concluded, “Our capital position continues to remain strong, and the Company is considered to be well-capitalized as defined by the regulators. We remain disciplined in our capital management strategies and during the six months ended June 30, 2025, we repurchased 497,318 shares of common stock with an average price per share of $9.31. We continue to believe that buying back shares, at current prices, represents a prudent use of the Company’s capital. On April 22, 2025, we announced a new repurchase plan (the “2025 Plan”) which commenced upon the completion of the 2024 Repurchase Plan (the “2024 Plan”). On June 3, 2025, we announced the completion of the 2024 Plan, under which the Company repurchased a total of 1.0 million shares at an average price per share of $8.79. We are pleased with our second quarter results and are committed to delivering long-term value to shareholders through capital management strategies, which include continued loan growth, share repurchases and quarterly cash dividends.”

    Key Highlights:

    Loans and Deposits

    Total gross loans increased $22.1 million, or 1.1%, from $2.1 billion, or 77.9% of total assets, at December 31, 2024 to $2.1 billion, or 77.1% of total assets, at June 30, 2025. The increase in total gross loans was primarily driven by an increase in residential real estate loans, including home equity loans, of $29.7 million, or 3.8%, and an increase in commercial and industrial loans of $22.8 million, or 10.8%. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in commercial real estate loans of $29.5 million, or 2.7%, and a decrease in consumer loans of $879,000, or 20.0%.

    At June 30, 2025, total deposits of $2.3 billion increased $67.5 million, or 3.0%, from December 31, 2024. Core deposits, which the Company defines as all deposits except time deposits, increased $81.4 million, or 5.2%, from $1.6 billion, or 68.9% of total deposits, at December 31, 2024, to $1.6 billion, or 70.4% of total deposits, at June 30, 2025. Time deposits decreased $13.9 million, or 2.0%, from $703.6 million at December 31, 2024 to $689.7 million at June 30, 2025. Brokered time deposits, which are included in time deposits, totaled $1.7 million at December 31, 2024. The Company did not have brokered time deposits at June 30, 2025. The loan-to-deposit ratio decreased from 91.5% at December 31, 2024 to 89.8% at June 30, 2025.

    Allowance for Loan Losses and Credit Quality

    At June 30, 2025, the allowance for credit losses was $19.7 million, or 0.94% of total loans, compared to $19.5 million, or 0.94% of total loans, at December 31, 2024. The allowance for loan losses, as a percentage of nonaccrual loans, was 343.1% and 362.9% at June 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively. At June 30, 2025, nonaccrual loans totaled $5.8 million, or 0.27% of total loans, compared to $5.4 million, or 0.26% of total loans, at December 31, 2024. Total delinquent loans decreased from $5.0 million, or 0.24% of total loans, at December 31, 2024 to $3.9 million, or 0.18% of total loans, at June 30, 2025. At June 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, the Company did not have any other real estate owned.

    Net Interest Margin

    The net interest margin increased 31 basis points, from 2.49% for the three months ended March 31, 2025 to 2.80% for the three months ended June 30, 2025. The net interest margin, on a tax-equivalent basis, increased 31 basis points from 2.51% for the three months ended March 31, 2025 to 2.82%, for the three months ended June 30, 2025.

    Stock Repurchase Program

    On April 22, 2025, the Board of Directors authorized the 2025 Plan, pursuant to which the Company may repurchase up to 1.0 million shares of its common stock, or approximately 4.8%, of the Company’s then-outstanding shares of common stock, upon the completion of the 2024 Plan. On June 3, 2025, the Company announced the completion of its 2024 Plan under which the Company repurchased a total of 1.0 million shares at an average price per share of $8.79.

    During the three months ended June 30, 2025, the Company repurchased 290,609 shares of its common stock at an average price per share of $9.45. During the six months ended June 30, 2025, the Company repurchased 497,318 shares of its common stock at an average price per share of $9.31. As of June 30, 2025, there were 975,000 shares of common stock available for repurchase under the 2025 Plan.

    The repurchase of shares under our 2025 Plan is administered through an independent broker. The shares of common stock repurchased under the 2025 Plan have been and will continue to be purchased from time to time at prevailing market prices, through open market or privately negotiated transactions, or otherwise, depending upon market conditions. There is no guarantee as to the exact number, or value, of shares that will be repurchased by the Company, and the Company may discontinue repurchases at any time that the Company’s management (“Management”) determines additional repurchases are not warranted. The timing and amount of additional share repurchases under the 2025 Plan will depend on a number of factors, including the Company’s stock price performance, ongoing capital planning considerations, general market conditions, and applicable legal requirements.

    Book Value and Tangible Book Value

    The Company’s book value per share was $11.68 at June 30, 2025 compared to $11.30 at December 31, 2024, while tangible book value per share, a non-GAAP financial measure, increased $0.38, or 3.6%, from $10.63 at December 31, 2024 to $11.01 at June 30, 2025. See pages 19-21 for the related tangible book value calculation and a reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures.

    Net Income for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2025 Compared to the Three Months Ended March 31, 2025

    For the three months ended June 30, 2025, the Company reported an increase in net income of $2.3 million, or 99.3%, from $2.3 million, or $0.11 per diluted share, for the three months ended March 31, 2025, to $4.6 million, or $0.23 per diluted share. Net interest income increased $2.1 million, or 13.6%, the provision for credit losses decreased $757,000, non-interest income increased $652,000, or 23.6%, and non-interest expense increased $472,000, or 3.1%. Return on average assets and return on average equity were 0.69% and 7.76%, respectively, for the three months ended June 30, 2025, compared to 0.35% and 3.94%, respectively, for the three months ended March 31, 2025.

    Net Interest Income and Net Interest Margin

    On a sequential quarter basis, net interest income, our primary driver of revenues, increased $2.1 million, or 13.6%, to $17.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025, from $15.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025. The increase in net interest income was primarily due to an increase in interest income of $1.2 million, or 4.1%, and a decrease in interest expense of $933,000, or 7.2%. During the three months ended June 30, 2025, the Company recorded $425,000 in prepayment penalties related to payoffs in the commercial portfolio. The $933,000, or 7.2%, decrease in interest expense was primarily due to a decrease in average rates paid on interest-bearing deposits during the three months ended June 30, 2025, compared to the three months ended March 31, 2025.

    The net interest margin was 2.80% for the three months ended June 30, 2025, compared to 2.49% for the three months ended March 31, 2025. The net interest margin, on a tax-equivalent basis, was 2.82% for the three months ended June 30, 2025, compared to 2.51% for the three months ended March 31, 2025. Excluding the prepayment penalties discussed above, the net interest margin increased 24 basis points from 2.49% for the three months ended March 31, 2025 to 2.73% for the three months ended June 30, 2025. The increase in the net interest margin was primarily due to an increase in the yield on average interest-earning assets and a decrease in the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities.

    The average yield on interest-earning assets, without the impact of tax-equivalent adjustments, increased 13 basis points from 4.56%, for the three months ended March 31, 2025 to 4.69% for the three months ended June 30, 2025. The average loan yield, without the impact of tax-equivalent adjustments, increased 16 basis points from 4.89%, for the three months ended March 31, 2025, to 5.05% for the three months ended June 30, 2025. During the same period, average loans increased $7.8 million, or 0.4%, and average securities increased $9.7 million, or 2.7%, while average short-term investments decreased $17.4 million, or 22.9%.

    The average cost of total funds, including non-interest bearing accounts and borrowings, decreased 18 basis points from 2.16% for the three months ended March 31, 2025 to 1.98% for the three months ended June 30, 2025. The average cost of core deposits, which the Company defines as all deposits except time deposits, decreased seven basis points to 1.01% for the three months ended June 30, 2025, from 1.08% for the three months ended March 31, 2025. The average cost of time deposits decreased 42 basis points from 4.11% for the three months ended March 31, 2025, to 3.69% for the three months ended June 30, 2025. The average cost of borrowings, including subordinated debt, was 5.04% for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and for the three months ended June 30, 2025. Average demand deposits, an interest-free source of funds, increased $3.2 million, or 0.6%, from $569.6 million, or 24.8%, of total average deposits, for the three months ended March 31, 2025, to $572.8 million, or 24.9% of total average deposits, for the three months ended June 30, 2025.

    (Reversal of) Provision for Credit Losses

    During the three months ended June 30, 2025, the Company recorded a reversal of credit losses of $615,000, compared to a provision for credit losses of $142,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2025. The reversal of credit losses was a result of a recovery in the amount of $624,000 on a previously charged-off commercial relationship acquired on October 21, 2016 from Chicopee Bancorp, Inc. As of June 30, 2025, the relationship has been paid in full and the Company does not expect to charge-off or recover any additional funds from the borrower. The provision for credit losses was determined by a number of factors: the continued strong credit performance of the Company’s loan portfolio, changes in the loan portfolio mix and Management’s consideration of existing economic conditions and the economic outlook from the Federal Reserve’s actions to control inflation. Management continues to monitor macroeconomic variables related to increasing interest rates, tariffs, inflation and concerns of an economic downturn, and believes it is appropriately reserved for the current economic environment.

    During the three months ended June 30, 2025, the Company recorded net recoveries of $585,000 compared to net charge-offs of $29,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2025.

    Non-Interest Income

    On a sequential quarter basis, non-interest income increased $652,000, or 23.6%, to $3.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025, from $2.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025. During the three months ended June 30, 2025, service charges and fees on deposits increased $244,000, or 10.7%, to $2.5 million from the three months ended March 31, 2025. Income from bank-owned life insurance (“BOLI”) increased $43,000, or 9.1%, from the three months ended March 31, 2025 to $516,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2025.

    During the three months ended June 30, 2025, the Company reported a gain of $4,000 from mortgage banking activities, compared to a gain of $7,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2025. During the three months ended June 30, 2025, the Company reported unrealized gains on marketable equity securities of $25,000, compared to unrealized losses of $5,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2025. During the three months ended June 30, 2025, the Company reported gains on non-marketable equity investments of $243,000 and did not have comparable income during the three months ended March 31, 2025. During the three months ended June 30, 2025, the Company reported $95,000 in other income from loan-level swap fees on commercial loans and did not have comparable income during the three months ended March 31, 2025.

    Non-Interest Expense

    For the three months ended June 30, 2025, non-interest expense increased $472,000, or 3.1%, to $15.7 million from $15.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025. Salaries and related benefits increased $418,000, or 5.0%, due to an increase in deferred compensation expense to reflect updated performance award estimates and a full quarter of annual salary merit increases. Debit card processing and ATM network costs increased $97,000, or 16.8%, professional fees increased $77,000, or 14.1%, data processing expense increased $51,000, or 5.8%, advertising expense increased $14,000, or 3.3%, furniture and equipment expense increased $4,000, or 0.8%, and other non-interest expense increased $4,000, or 0.3%. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in occupancy expense of $147,000, or 10.4%, primarily due to a decrease in snow removal costs of $140,000. FDIC insurance expense decreased $32,000, or 7.4%, and software related expenses decreased $14,000, or 2.1%.

    For the three months ended June 30, 2025 and the three months ended March 31, 2025, the efficiency ratio was 74.4% and 83.0%, respectively. For the three months ended June 30, 2025, the adjusted efficiency ratio, a non-GAAP financial measure, was 75.3% compared to 83.0% for the three months ended March 31, 2025. The decreases in the efficiency ratio and the adjusted efficiency ratio were driven by higher revenues during the three months ended June 30, 2025 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2025. The Company’s detailed reconciliation between the non-GAAP measure and the comparable GAAP amount are included at the end of this document. See pages 19-21 for the related adjusted efficiency ratio calculation and a reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures.

    Income Tax Provision

    Income tax expense for the three months ended June 30, 2025 was $1.4 million, with an effective tax rate of 23.7%, compared to $664,000, with an effective tax rate of 22.4%, for the three months ended March 31, 2025. The increase in tax expense is due to higher projected pre-tax income for the twelve months ended December 31, 2025.

    Net Income for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2025 Compared to the Three Months Ended June 30, 2024

    The Company reported an increase in net income of $1.1 million, or 30.7%, from $3.5 million, or $0.17 per diluted share, for the three months ended June 30, 2024 to $4.6 million, or $0.23 per diluted share, for the three months ended June 30, 2025. Net interest income increased $3.2 million, or 21.9%, provision for credit losses decreased $321,000, non-interest income decreased $423,000, or 11.0%, and non-interest expense increased $1.3 million, or 9.4%, during the same period. Return on average assets and return on average equity were 0.69% and 7.76%, respectively, for the three months ended June 30, 2025, compared to 0.55% and 6.03%, respectively, for the three months ended June 30, 2024.

    Net Interest Income and Net Interest Margin

    Net interest income increased $3.2 million, or 21.9%, to $17.6 million, for the three months ended June 30, 2025, from $14.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2024. The increase in net interest income was due to an increase in interest and dividend income of $2.8 million, or 10.5%, and a decrease in interest expense of $362,000, or 2.9%. During the three months ended June 30, 2025, the Company recorded $425,000 in prepayment penalties related to payoffs in the commercial portfolio. The increase in interest income was primarily due to a $129.4 million, or 5.4%, increase in average interest-earning assets and a 20 basis point increase in the average yield on interest-earning assets, from the three months ended June 30, 2024 to the three months ended June 30, 2025.

    The net interest margin increased 38 basis points from 2.42% for the three months ended June 30, 2024 to 2.80% for the three months ended June 30, 2025. The net interest margin, on a tax-equivalent basis, was 2.82% for the three months ended June 30, 2025, compared to 2.44% for the three months ended June 30, 2024. Excluding the prepayment penalties discussed above, the net interest margin increased 31 basis points from 2.42%, for the three months ended June 30, 2024 to 2.73%, for the three months ended June 30, 2025. The increase in the net interest margin was primarily due to an increase in the average yield on interest-earning assets and a decrease in the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities.

    The average yield on interest-earning assets, without the impact of tax-equivalent adjustments, increased 20 basis points from 4.49% for the three months ended June 30, 2024 to 4.69%, for the three months ended June 30, 2025. The average loan yield, without the impact of tax-equivalent adjustments, increased 20 basis points from 4.85% for the three months ended June 30, 2024 to 5.05%, for the three months ended June 30, 2025. During the three months ended June 30, 2025, average interest-earning assets increased $129.4 million, or 5.4% to $2.5 billion, primarily due to an increase in average loans of $64.2 million, or 3.2%, an increase in average short-term investments, consisting of cash and cash equivalents, of $44.3 million, or 309.1%, and an increase in average securities of $20.2 million, or 5.7%.

    The average cost of total funds, including non-interest bearing accounts and borrowings, decreased 18 basis points from 2.16% for the three months ended June 30, 2024 to 1.98% for the three months ended June 30, 2025. The average cost of core deposits, which the Company defines as all deposits except time deposits, increased 14 basis points from 0.87% for the three months ended June 30, 2024 to 1.01% for the three months ended June 30, 2025. The average cost of time deposits decreased 70 basis points from 4.39% for the three months ended June 30, 2024 to 3.69% for the three months ended June 30, 2025. The average cost of borrowings, including subordinated debt, increased four basis points from 5.00% for the three months ended June 30, 2024 to 5.04%, for the three months ended June 30, 2025. Average demand deposits, an interest-free source of funds, increased $24.1 million, or 4.4%, from $548.8 million, or 25.7% of total average deposits, for the three months ended June 30, 2024, to $572.8 million, or 24.9% of total average deposits, for the three months ended June 30, 2025.

    Reversal of Credit Losses

    During the three months ended June, 30, 2025, the Company recorded a reversal of credit losses of $615,000, compared to a reversal of credit losses of $294,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2024. The reversal of credit losses recorded during the three months ended June 30, 2025 was a result of a recovery in the amount of $624,000 on a previously charged-off commercial relationship acquired on October 21, 2016 from Chicopee Bancorp, Inc. As of June 30, 2025, the relationship has been paid in full and the Company does not expect to charge-off or recover any additional funds from the borrower. The provision for credit losses was determined by a number of factors: the continued strong credit performance of the Company’s loan portfolio, changes in the loan portfolio mix and Management’s consideration of existing economic conditions and the economic outlook from the Federal Reserve’s actions to control inflation. Management continues to monitor macroeconomic variables related to increasing interest rates, tariffs, inflation and concerns of an economic downturn, and believes it is appropriately reserved for the current economic environment.

    The Company recorded net recoveries of $585,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2025, as compared to net charge-offs of $10,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2024.

    Non-Interest Income

    Non-interest income decreased $423,000, or 11.0%, to $3.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025, from $3.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2024. During the three months ended June 30, 2025, service charges and fees on deposits increased $187,000, or 8.0%, income from BOLI increased $14,000, or 2.8%, from $502,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2024 to $516,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2025.

    During the three months ended June 30, 2025, the Company reported an unrealized gain on marketable equity securities of $25,000, compared to unrealized gain on marketable equity securities of $4,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2024. During the three months ended June 30, 2025, the Company reported a gain of $243,000 on non-marketable equity investments, compared to a gain of $987,000 on non-marketable equity investments during the three months ended June 30, 2024. During the three months ended June 30, 2025, the Company reported $95,000 in other income from loan-level swap fees on commercial loans and did not have comparable income during the three months ended June 30, 2024. During the three months ended June 30, 2025, the Company reported $4,000 in gains from mortgage banking activities and did not have comparable income during the three months ended June 30, 2024.

    Non-Interest Expense

    For the three months ended June 30, 2025, non-interest expense increased $1.3 million, or 9.4%, to $15.7 million from $14.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2024. The increase in non-interest expense was due to an increase in salaries and benefits of $930,000, or 11.8%, an increase in advertising and marketing expense of $104,000, or 30.7%, an increase in data processing expense of $87,000, or 10.3%, an increase in software related expense of $79,000, or 14.0%, an increase in FDIC insurance expense of $76,000, or 23.5%, an increase in occupancy expense of $47,000, or 3.9%, an increase in professional fees of $42,000, or 7.2%, an increase in debit card and ATM processing fees of $31,000, or 4.8%, an increase in furniture and equipment expense of $8,000, or 1.7%, and a decrease in other non-interest expense of $62,000, or 4.4%.

    For the three months ended June 30, 2025, the efficiency ratio was 74.4%, compared to 78.2% for the three months ended June 30, 2024. For the three months ended June 30, 2025, the adjusted efficiency ratio, a non-GAAP financial measure, was 75.3% compared to 82.7% for the three months ended June 30, 2024. The decreases in the efficiency ratio and the adjusted efficiency ratio were driven by an increase in total revenues, defined as the sum of net interest income and non-interest income, during the three months ended June 30, 2025, compared to the three months ended June 30, 2024. See pages 19-21 for the related ratio calculation and a reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures.

    Income Tax Provision

    Income tax expense for the three months ended June 30, 2025 was $1.4 million, or an effective tax rate of 23.7%, compared to $771,000, or an effective tax rate of 18.0%, for the three months ended June 30, 2024. The increase is due to higher projected pre-tax income for the twelve months ended December 31, 2025.

    Net Income for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2025 Compared to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2024

    For the six months ended June 30, 2025, the Company reported net income of $6.9 million, or $0.34 per diluted share, compared to $6.5 million, or $0.31 per diluted share, for the six months ended June 30, 2024. Return on average assets and return on average equity were 0.52% and 5.87% for the six months ended June 30, 2025, respectively, compared to 0.51% and 5.53% for the six months ended June 30, 2024, respectively.

    Net Interest Income and Net Interest Margin

    During the six months ended June 30, 2025, net interest income increased $3.4 million, or 11.3%, to $33.2 million, compared to $29.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2024. The increase in net interest income was due to an increase in interest income of $4.6 million, or 8.7%, partially offset by an increase in interest expense of $1.3 million, or 5.4%.

    For the six months ended June 30, 2025, the net interest margin increased 14 basis points from 2.50% for the six months ended June 30, 2024 to 2.64%. The net interest margin, on a tax-equivalent basis, was 2.66% for the six months ended June 30, 2025, compared to 2.52% for the six months ended June 30, 2024. During the six months ended June 30, 2025 and the six months ended June 30, 2024, the Company recorded $425,000 and $8,000, respectively, in prepayment penalties related to payoffs in the commercial portfolio. Excluding the prepayment penalties, the net interest margin increased 11 basis points from 2.50% for the six months ended June 30, 2024 to 2.61% for the six months ended June 30, 2025.

    The average yield on interest-earning assets, without the impact of tax-equivalent adjustments, was 4.63% for the six months ended June 30, 2025, compared to 4.47% for the six months ended June 30, 2024. The average loan yield, without the impact of tax-equivalent adjustments, was 4.97% for the six months ended June 30, 2025, compared to 4.84% for the six months ended June 30, 2024. During the six months ended June 30, 2025, average interest-earning assets increased $128.0 million, or 5.3%, to $2.5 billion, from the same period in 2024. The increase was primarily due to an increase in average loans of $58.0 million, or 2.9%, an increase in average short-term investments, consisting of cash and cash equivalents, of $55.4 million, or 467.4%, and an increase in average securities of $13.1 million, or 3.7%.

    The average cost of total funds, including non-interest bearing accounts and borrowings, was 2.07% for each of the six months ended June 30, 2025 and June 30, 2024. The average cost of core deposits, which the Company defines as all deposits except time deposits, increased 23 basis points to 1.05% for the six months ended June 30, 2025, from 0.82% for the six months ended June 30, 2024. The average cost of time deposits decreased 36 basis points from 4.26% for the six months ended June 30, 2024 to 3.90% for the six months ended June 30, 2025. The average cost of borrowings, including subordinated debt, increased eight basis points from 4.96% for the six months ended June 30, 2024 to 5.04% for the six months ended June 30, 2025. Average demand deposits, an interest-free source of funds, increased $18.0 million, or 3.3%, from $553.2 million, or 25.9% of total average deposits, for the six months ended June 30, 2024 to $571.2 million, or 24.8% of total average deposits, for the six months ended June 30, 2025.

    Reversal of Credit Losses

    During the six months ended June 30, 2025, the Company recorded a reversal of credit losses of $473,000, compared to a reversal of credit losses of $844,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2024. The decrease was primarily due to changes in the loan mix as well as economic environment and related adjustments to the quantitative components of the CECL methodology. The provision for credit losses was determined by a number of factors: the continued strong credit performance of the Company’s loan portfolio, changes in the loan portfolio mix and Management’s consideration of existing economic conditions and the economic outlook from the Federal Reserve’s actions to control inflation. Management continues to monitor macroeconomic variables related to increasing interest rates, tariffs, inflation and concerns of an economic downturn, and believes it is appropriately reserved for the current economic environment.

    The Company recorded net recoveries of $556,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2025, as compared to net recoveries of $57,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2024. During the six months ended June 30, 2025, the Company recorded a recovery of $624,000 on a previously charged-off commercial relationship acquired on October 21, 2016 from Chicopee Bancorp, Inc. As of June 30, 2025, the relationship has been paid in full and the Company does not expect to charge-off or recover any additional funds from the borrower.

    Non-Interest Income

    For the six months ended June 30, 2025, non-interest income decreased $338,000, or 5.2%, from $6.5 million during the six months ended June 30, 2024 to $6.2 million. During the same period, service charges and fees on deposits increased $252,000, or 5.5%, and income from BOLI increased $34,000, or 3.6%. During the six months ended June 30, 2025, the Company reported a gain of $243,000 on non-marketable equity investments, compared to a gain of $987,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2024. During the six months ended June 30, 2025, the Company reported $95,000 in other income from loan-level swap fees on commercial loans and did not have comparable income during the six months ended June 30, 2024. During the six months ended June 30, 2025, the Company reported unrealized gains on marketable equity securities of $20,000, compared to unrealized gains on marketable equity securities of $12,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2024. Gains and losses from the investment portfolio vary from quarter to quarter based on market conditions, as well as the related yield curve and valuation changes. During the six months ended June 30, 2025, the Company reported $11,000 in gains from mortgage banking activities and did not have comparable gains or losses during the six months ended June 30, 2024. In addition, during the six months ended June 30, 2024, the Company reported a loss on the disposal of premises and equipment of $6,000 and did not have a comparable gain or loss during the six months ended June 30, 2025.

    Non-Interest Expense

    For the six months ended June 30, 2025, non-interest expense increased $1.7 million, or 6.0%, to $30.8 million, compared to $29.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2024. The increase in non-interest expense was primarily due to an increase in salaries and employee benefits of $1.1 million, or 6.8%, due to an increase in deferred compensation expense to reflect updated performance award estimates. Advertising expense increased $184,000, or 26.7%, data processing increased $107,000, or 6.3%, FDIC insurance expense increased $97,000, or 13.2%, occupancy expense increased $96,000, or 3.7%, debit card and ATM processing fees increased $56,000, or 4.7%, software related expenses increased $39,000, or 3.1%, professional fees increased $19,000, or 1.7%, furniture and equipment expense increased $11,000, or 1.1%, and other non-interest expense increased $36,000, or 1.4%.

    For the six months ended June 30, 2025, the efficiency ratio was 78.4%, compared to 80.1% for the six months ended June 30, 2024. For the six months ended June 30, 2025, the adjusted efficiency ratio, a non-GAAP financial measure, was 78.9%, compared to 82.4% for the six months ended June 30, 2024. The decreases in the efficiency ratio and the adjusted efficiency ratio were driven by higher revenues, defined as the sum of net interest income and non-interest income, during the six months ended June 30, 2025, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2024. The adjusted efficiency ratio is a non-GAAP measure. See pages 19-21 for the related efficiency ratio calculation and a reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures.

    Income Tax Provision

    Income tax expense for the six months ended June 30, 2025 was $2.1 million, representing an effective tax rate of 23.2%, compared to $1.6 million, representing an effective tax rate of 19.8%, for six months ended June 30, 2024. The increase is due to higher projected pre-tax income for the twelve months ended December 31, 2025.

    Balance Sheet

    At June 30, 2025, total assets were $2.7 billion, an increase of $58.1 million, or 2.2%, from December 31, 2024. The increase in total assets was primarily due to an increase in total gross loans of $22.1 million, or 1.1%, an increase in cash and cash equivalents of $26.9 million, or 40.4%, and an increase in investment securities of $10.8 million, or 2.9%.

    Investments

    At June 30, 2025, the investment securities portfolio totaled $376.9 million, or 13.9% of total assets, compared to $366.1 million, or 13.8% of total assets, at December 31, 2024. At June 30, 2025, the Company’s available-for-sale securities portfolio, recorded at fair market value, increased $18.1 million, or 11.3%, from $160.7 million at December 31, 2024 to $178.8 million. The held-to-maturity securities portfolio, recorded at amortized cost, decreased $7.4 million, or 3.6%, from $205.0 million at December 31, 2024 to $197.7 million at June 30, 2025.

    At June 30, 2025, the Company reported unrealized losses on the available-for-sale securities portfolio of $26.6 million, or 12.9% of the amortized cost basis of the available-for-sale securities portfolio, compared to unrealized losses of $31.2 million, or 16.2% of the amortized cost basis of the available-for-sale securities at December 31, 2024. At June 30, 2025, the Company reported unrealized losses on the held-to-maturity securities portfolio of $35.4 million, or 17.8% of the amortized cost basis of the held-to-maturity securities portfolio, compared to $39.4 million, or 19.2% of the amortized cost basis of the held-to-maturity securities portfolio at December 31, 2024.

    The securities in which the Company may invest are limited by regulation. Federally chartered savings banks have authority to invest in various types of assets, including U.S. Treasury obligations, securities of various government-sponsored enterprises, mortgage-backed securities, certain certificates of deposit of insured financial institutions, repurchase agreements, overnight and short-term loans to other banks, corporate debt instruments and marketable equity securities. The securities, with the exception of $8.7 million in corporate bonds, are issued by the United States government or government-sponsored enterprises and are therefore either explicitly or implicitly guaranteed as to the timely payment of contractual principal and interest. These positions are deemed to have no credit impairment, therefore, the disclosed unrealized losses with the securities portfolio relate primarily to changes in prevailing interest rates. In all cases, price improvement in future periods will be realized as the issuances approach maturity.

    Management regularly reviews the portfolio for securities in an unrealized loss position. At June 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, the Company did not record any credit impairment charges on its securities portfolio and attributed the unrealized losses primarily due to fluctuations in general interest rates or changes in expected prepayments and not due to credit quality. The primary objective of the Company’s investment portfolio is to provide liquidity and to secure municipal deposit accounts while preserving the safety of principal. The available-for-sale and held-to-maturity portfolios are both eligible for pledging to the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) and Federal Reserve Bank (“FRB”) as collateral for borrowings. The portfolios are comprised of high-credit quality investments and both portfolios generated cash flows monthly from interest, principal amortization and payoffs, which support’s the Bank’s objective to provide liquidity.

    Total Loans

    Total gross loans increased $22.1 million, or 1.1%, from $2.1 billion, or 77.9% of total assets, at December 31, 2024 to $2.1 billion, or 77.1% of total assets, at June 30, 2025. The increase in total gross loans was primarily driven by an increase in residential real estate loans, including home equity loans, of $29.7 million, or 3.8%, and an increase in commercial and industrial loans of $22.8 million, or 10.8%. The increase in commercial and industrial loans was partially due to an increase in line of credit utilization, from 21.9% at December 31, 2024 to 26.1% at June 30, 2025. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in commercial real estate loans of $29.5 million, or 2.7%, and a decrease in consumer loans of $879,000, or 20.0%.

    The following table presents a summary of the loan portfolio by the major classification of loans at the periods indicated:

      June 30, 2025   December 31, 2024
      (Dollars in thousands)
       
    Commercial real estate loans:      
    Non-owner occupied $ 859,162   $ 880,828
    Owner occupied   187,043     194,904
    Total commercial real estate loans   1,046,205     1,075,732
           
    Residential real estate loans:      
    Residential   677,356     653,802
    Home equity   128,003     121,857
    Total residential real estate loans   805,359     775,659
           
    Commercial and industrial loans   234,505     211,656
           
    Consumer loans   3,512     4,391
    Total gross loans   2,089,581     2,067,438
    Unamortized premiums and net deferred loans fees and costs   3,050     2,751
    Total loans $ 2,092,631   $ 2,070,189


    Credit Quality

    Management continues to closely monitor the loan portfolio for any signs of deterioration in borrowers’ financial condition and also in light of speculation that commercial real estate values may deteriorate as the market continues to adjust to higher vacancies and interest rates. We continue to proactively take steps to mitigate risk in our loan portfolio.

    Total delinquency was $3.9 million, or 0.18% of total loans, at June 30, 2025, compared to $5.0 million, or 0.24% of total loans at December 31, 2024. At June 30, 2025, nonaccrual loans totaled $5.8 million, or 0.27% of total loans, compared to $5.4 million, or 0.26% of total loans, at December 31, 2024. At June 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, there were no loans 90 or more days past due and still accruing interest. Total nonaccrual assets totaled $5.8 million, or 0.21% of total assets, at June 30, 2025, compared to $5.4 million, or 0.20% of total assets, at December 31, 2024. At June 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, the Company did not have any other real estate owned.

    At June 30, 2025, the allowance for credit losses was $19.7 million, or 0.94% of total loans and 343.1% of nonaccrual loans, compared to $19.5 million, or 0.94% of total loans and 362.9% of nonaccrual loans, at December 31, 2024. Total criticized loans, defined as special mention and substandard loans, decreased $12.3 million, or 32.0%, from $38.4 million, or 1.9% of total loans, at December 31, 2024 to $26.1 million, or 1.2% of total gross loans, at June 30, 2025.

    Our commercial real estate portfolio is comprised of diversified property types and primarily within our geographic footprint. At June 30, 2025, the commercial real estate portfolio totaled $1.0 billion, and represented 50.1% of total gross loans. Of the $1.0 billion, $859.2 million, or 82.1%, was categorized as non-owner occupied commercial real estate and represented 316.9% of the Bank’s total risk-based capital. More details on the diversification of the loan portfolio are available in the supplementary earnings presentation.

    Deposits

    At June 30, 2025, total deposits were $2.3 billion and increased $67.5 million, or 3.0%, from December 31, 2024. Core deposits, which the Company defines as all deposits except time deposits, increased $81.4 million, or 5.2%, from $1.6 billion, or 68.9% of total deposits, at December 31, 2024, to $1.6 billion, or 70.4% of total deposits, at June 30, 2025. Non-interest-bearing deposits increased $29.6 million, or 5.2%, to $595.3 million, and represent 25.5% of total deposits, money market accounts increased $25.3 million, or 3.8%, to $686.8 million, interest-bearing checking accounts increased $18.3 million, or 12.2%, to $168.7 million, and savings accounts increased $8.1 million, or 4.5%, to $189.7 million.

    Time deposits decreased $13.9 million, or 2.0%, from $703.6 million at December 31, 2024 to $689.7 million at June 30, 2025. Brokered time deposits, which are included in time deposits, totaled $1.7 million at December 31, 2024. The Company did not have brokered time deposits at June 30, 2025. We continue our disciplined and focused approach to core relationship management and customer outreach to meet funding requirements and liquidity needs, with an emphasis on retaining a long-term core customer relationship base by competing for and retaining deposits in our local market. At June 30, 2025, the Bank’s uninsured deposits totaled $688.4 million, or 29.5% of total deposits, compared to $643.6 million, or 28.4% of total deposits, at December 31, 2024.

    The table below is a summary of our deposit balances for the periods noted:

                 
        June 30, 2025   December 31, 2024   June 30, 2024
        (Dollars in thousands)
    Core Deposits:            
    Demand accounts   $ 595,263   $ 565,620   $ 553,329
    Interest-bearing accounts     168,679     150,348     149,100
    Savings accounts     189,716     181,618     186,171
    Money market accounts     686,774     661,478     611,501
    Total Core Deposits   $ 1,640,432   $ 1,559,064   $ 1,500,101
    Time Deposits:     689,681     703,583     671,708
    Total Deposits:   $ 2,330,113   $ 2,262,647   $ 2,171,809


    FHLB and Subordinated Debt

    At June 30, 2025, total borrowings decreased $1.3 million, or 1.1%, from $123.1 million at December 31, 2024 to $121.8 million. At June 30, 2025, short-term borrowings decreased $1.4 million, or 25.1%, to $4.0 million, compared to $5.4 million at December 31, 2024. Long-term borrowings were $98.0 million at June 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024. At June 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, borrowings also consisted of $19.8 million in fixed-to-floating rate subordinated notes.

    As of June 30, 2025, the Company had $452.7 million of additional borrowing capacity at the FHLB, $383.8 million of additional borrowing capacity under the FRB Discount Window and $25.0 million of other unsecured lines of credit with correspondent banks.

    Capital

    At June 30, 2025, shareholders’ equity was $239.4 million, or 8.8% of total assets, compared to $235.9 million, or 8.9% of total assets, at December 31, 2024. The change was primarily attributable to a decrease in accumulated other comprehensive loss of $3.5 million, cash dividends paid of $2.9 million, repurchase of shares at a cost of $4.7 million, partially offset by net income of $6.9 million. At June 30, 2025, total shares outstanding were 20,494,501. The Company’s regulatory capital ratios continue to be strong and in excess of regulatory minimum requirements to be considered well-capitalized as defined by regulators and internal Company targets.

      June 30, 2025   December 31, 2024
      Company   Bank   Company   Bank
    Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) 14.42 %   13.69 %   14.38 %   13.65 %
    Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) 12.40 %   12.67 %   12.37 %   12.64 %
    Common Equity Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) 12.40 %   12.67 %   12.37 %   12.64 %
    Tier 1 Leverage Ratio (to Adjusted Average Assets) 9.10 %   9.29 %   9.14 %   9.34 %


    Dividends

    Although the Company has historically paid quarterly dividends on its common stock and currently intends to continue to pay such dividends, the Company’s ability to pay such dividends depends on a number of factors, including restrictions under federal laws and regulations on the Company’s ability to pay dividends, and as a result, there can be no assurance that dividends will continue to be paid in the future.

    About Western New England Bancorp, Inc.

    Western New England Bancorp, Inc. is a Massachusetts-chartered stock holding company and the parent company of Westfield Bank, CSB Colts, Inc., Elm Street Securities Corporation, WFD Securities, Inc. and WB Real Estate Holdings, LLC. Western New England Bancorp, Inc. and its subsidiaries are headquartered in Westfield, Massachusetts and operate 25 banking offices throughout western Massachusetts and northern Connecticut. To learn more, visit our website at www.westfieldbank.com.

    Forward-Looking Statements

    This press release contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, with respect to the Company’s financial condition, liquidity, results of operations, future performance, and business. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of such words as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “should,” “planned,” “estimated,” and “potential.” Examples of forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, estimates with respect to our financial condition, results of operations and business that are subject to various factors which could cause actual results to differ materially from these estimates. These factors include, but are not limited to:

    • unpredictable changes in general economic or political conditions, financial markets, fiscal, monetary and regulatory policies, including actual or potential stress in the banking industry;
    • unstable political and economic conditions, including changes in tariff policies, which could materially impact credit quality trends and the ability to generate loans and gather deposits;
    • inflation and governmental responses to inflation, including recent sustained increases and potential future increases in interest rates that reduce margins;
    • the effect on our operations of governmental legislation and regulation, including changes in accounting regulation or standards, the nature and timing of the adoption and effectiveness of new requirements under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, Basel guidelines, capital requirements and other applicable laws and regulations;
    • significant changes in accounting, tax or regulatory practices or requirements;
    • new legal obligations or liabilities or unfavorable resolutions of litigation;
    • disruptive technologies in payment systems and other services traditionally provided by banks;
    • the highly competitive industry and market area in which we operate;
    • operational risks or risk management failures by us or critical third parties, including without limitation with respect to data processing, information systems, cybersecurity, technological changes, vendor issues, business interruption, and fraud risks;
    • failure or circumvention of our internal controls or procedures;
    • changes in the securities markets which affect investment management revenues;
    • increases in Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation deposit insurance premiums and assessments;
    • the soundness of other financial services institutions which may adversely affect our credit risk;
    • certain of our intangible assets may become impaired in the future;
    • the duration and scope of potential pandemics, including the emergence of new variants and the response thereto;
    • new lines of business or new products and services, which may subject us to additional risks;
    • changes in key management personnel which may adversely impact our operations;
    • severe weather, natural disasters, acts of war or terrorism and other external events which could significantly impact our business; and
    • other risk factors detailed from time to time in our SEC filings.

    Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, actual results may differ materially from the results discussed in these forward-looking statements. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. We do not undertake any obligation to republish revised forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, except to the extent required by law.

    WESTERN NEW ENGLAND BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    Consolidated Statements of Net Income and Other Data
    (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
    (Unaudited)
      Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
      June 30, March 31, December 31, September 30, June 30, June 30,
        2025     2025     2024     2024     2024     2025     2024  
    INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME:              
    Loans $ 26,214   $ 24,984   $ 25,183   $ 25,134   $ 24,340   $ 51,198   $ 48,581  
    Securities   2,588     2,422     2,273     2,121     2,141     5,010     4,255  
    Other investments   169     191     214     189     148     360     284  
    Short-term investments   641     840     916     396     173     1,481     286  
    Total interest and dividend income   29,612     28,437     28,586     27,840     26,802     58,049     53,406  
                   
    INTEREST EXPENSE:              
    Deposits   10,437     11,376     11,443     11,165     10,335     21,813     19,628  
    Short-term borrowings   47     54     60     71     186     101     469  
    Long-term debt   1,232     1,219     1,557     1,622     1,557     2,451     2,985  
    Subordinated debt   254     254     253     254     254     508     508  
    Total interest expense   11,970     12,903     13,313     13,112     12,332     24,873     23,590  
                   
    Net interest and dividend income   17,642     15,534     15,273     14,728     14,470     33,176     29,816  
                   
    (REVERSAL OF) PROVISION FOR CREDIT LOSSES   (615 )   142     (762 )   941     (294 )   (473 )   (844 )
                   
    Net interest and dividend income after (reversal of) provision for credit losses   18,257     15,392     16,035     13,787     14,764     33,649     30,660  
                   
    NON-INTEREST INCOME:              
    Service charges and fees on deposits   2,528     2,284     2,301     2,341     2,341     4,812     4,560  
    Income from bank-owned life insurance   516     473     486     470     502     989     955  
    Unrealized gain (loss) on marketable equity securities   25     (5 )   (9 )   10     4     20     12  
    Gain (loss) on sale of mortgages   4     7     (11 )   246     –     11     –  
    Gain on non-marketable equity investments   243     –     300     –     987     243     987  
    Loss on disposal of premises and equipment   –     –     –     –     –     –     (6 )
    Other income   95     –     187     74     –     95     –  
    Total non-interest income   3,411     2,759     3,254     3,141     3,834     6,170     6,508  
                   
    NON-INTEREST EXPENSE:              
    Salaries and employees benefits   8,831     8,413     8,429     8,112     7,901     17,244     16,145  
    Occupancy   1,265     1,412     1,256     1,217     1,218     2,677     2,581  
    Furniture and equipment   491     487     505     483     483     978     967  
    Data processing   933     882     900     869     846     1,815     1,708  
    Software   645     659     642     612     566     1,304     1,265  
    Debit/ATM card processing expense   674     577     593     649     643     1,251     1,195  
    Professional fees   623     546     471     540     581     1,169     1,150  
    FDIC insurance   399     431     389     338     323     830     733  
    Advertising   443     429     310     271     339     872     688  
    Other   1,352     1,348     1,431     1,315     1,414     2,700     2,664  
    Total non-interest expense   15,656     15,184     14,926     14,406     14,314     30,840     29,096  
                   
    INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES   6,012     2,967     4,363     2,522     4,284     8,979     8,072  
                   
    INCOME TAX PROVISION   1,422     664     1,075     618     771     2,086     1,598  
    NET INCOME $ 4,590   $ 2,303   $ 3,288   $ 1,904   $ 3,513   $ 6,893   $ 6,474  
                   
    Basic earnings per share $ 0.23   $ 0.11   $ 0.16   $ 0.09   $ 0.17   $ 0.34   $ 0.31  
    Weighted average shares outstanding   20,210,650     20,385,481     20,561,749     20,804,162     21,056,173     20,297,582     21,118,571  
    Diluted earnings per share $ 0.23   $ 0.11   $ 0.16   $ 0.09   $ 0.17   $ 0.34   $ 0.31  
    Weighted average diluted shares outstanding   20,312,881     20,514,098     20,701,276     20,933,833     21,163,762     20,413,006     21,217,543  
                   
    Other Data:              
    Return on average assets (1)   0.69 %   0.35 %   0.49 %   0.29 %   0.55 %   0.52 %   0.51 %
    Return on average equity (1)   7.76 %   3.94 %   5.48 %   3.19 %   6.03 %   5.87 %   5.53 %
    Efficiency ratio   74.36 %   83.00 %   80.56 %   80.62 %   78.20 %   78.38 %   80.10 %
    Adjusted efficiency ratio (2)   75.32 %   82.98 %   81.85 %   80.67 %   82.68 %   78.91 %   82.35 %
    Net interest margin   2.80 %   2.49 %   2.41 %   2.40 %   2.42 %   2.64 %   2.50 %
    Net interest margin, on a fully tax-equivalent basis   2.82 %   2.51 %   2.43 %   2.42 %   2.44 %   2.66 %   2.52 %
    (1) Annualized.          
    (2) The adjusted efficiency ratio (non-GAAP) represents the ratio of operating expenses divided by the sum of net interest and dividend income and non-interest income, excluding realized and unrealized gains and losses on securities, gain on non-marketable equity investments, and loss on disposal of premises and equipment.
    WESTERN NEW ENGLAND BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    Consolidated Balance Sheets
    (Dollars in thousands)
    (Unaudited)

      June 30,   March 31,   December 31,   September 30,   June 30,
        2025       2025       2024       2024       2024  
    Cash and cash equivalents $ 93,308     $ 110,579     $ 66,450     $ 72,802     $ 53,458  
    Securities available-for-sale, at fair value   178,785       167,800       160,704       155,889       135,089  
    Securities held to maturity, at amortized cost   197,671       201,557       205,036       213,266       217,632  
    Marketable equity securities, at fair value   444       414       397       252       233  
    Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston and other restricted stock – at cost   5,818       5,818       5,818       7,143       7,143  
                       
    Loans   2,092,631       2,079,561       2,070,189       2,049,002       2,026,226  
    Allowance for credit losses   (19,733 )     (19,669 )     (19,529 )     (19,955 )     (19,444 )
    Net loans   2,072,898       2,059,892       2,050,660       2,029,047       2,006,782  
                       
    Bank-owned life insurance   78,045       77,529       77,056       76,570       76,100  
    Goodwill   12,487       12,487       12,487       12,487       12,487  
    Core deposit intangible   1,250       1,344       1,438       1,531       1,625  
    Other assets   70,443       71,864       73,044       71,492       75,521  
    TOTAL ASSETS $ 2,711,149     $ 2,709,284     $ 2,653,090     $ 2,640,479     $ 2,586,070  
                       
    Total deposits $ 2,330,113     $ 2,328,593     $ 2,262,647     $ 2,224,206     $ 2,171,809  
    Short-term borrowings   4,040       4,520       5,390       4,390       6,570  
    Long-term debt   98,000       98,000       98,000       128,277       128,277  
    Subordinated debt   19,771       19,761       19,751       19,741       19,731  
    Securities pending settlement   –       2,093       8,622       2,513       102  
    Other liabilities   19,797       18,641       22,770       20,697       23,104  
    TOTAL LIABILITIES   2,471,721       2,471,608       2,417,180       2,399,824       2,349,593  
                       
    TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY   239,428       237,676       235,910       240,655       236,477  
    TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY $ 2,711,149     $ 2,709,284     $ 2,653,090     $ 2,640,479     $ 2,586,070  
                       
    WESTERN NEW ENGLAND BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    Other Data
    (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
    (Unaudited)
      Three Months Ended
      June 30,   March 31,   December 31,   September 30,   June 30,
      2025   2025   2024   2024   2024
    Shares outstanding at end of period 20,494,501   20,774,319   20,875,713   21,113,408   21,357,849
                       
    Operating results:                  
    Net interest income $ 17,642   $ 15,534   $ 15,273   $ 14,728   $ 14,470
    (Reversal of) provision for credit losses (615)   142   (762)   941   (294)
    Non-interest income 3,411   2,759   3,254   3,141   3,834
    Non-interest expense 15,656   15,184   14,926   14,406   14,314
    Income before income provision for income taxes 6,012   2,967   4,363   2,522   4,284
    Income tax provision 1,422   664   1,075   618   771
    Net income 4,590   2,303   3,288   1,904   3,513
                       
    Performance Ratios:                  
    Net interest margin 2.80%   2.49%   2.41%   2.40%   2.42%
    Net interest margin, on a fully tax-equivalent basis 2.82%   2.51%   2.43%   2.42%   2.44%
    Interest rate spread 2.10%   1.74%   1.63%   1.60%   1.66%
    Interest rate spread, on a fully tax-equivalent basis 2.12%   1.76%   1.65%   1.62%   1.67%
    Return on average assets 0.69%   0.35%   0.49%   0.29%   0.55%
    Return on average equity 7.76%   3.94%   5.48%   3.19%   6.03%
    Efficiency ratio (GAAP) 74.36%   83.00%   80.56%   80.62%   78.20%
    Adjusted efficiency ratio (non-GAAP) (1) 75.32%   82.98%   81.85%   80.67%   82.68%
                       
    Per Common Share Data:                  
    Basic earnings per share $ 0.23   $ 0.11   $ 0.16   $ 0.09   $ 0.17
    Earnings per diluted share 0.23   0.11   0.16   0.09   0.17
    Cash dividend declared 0.07   0.07   0.07   0.07   0.07
    Book value per share 11.68   11.44   11.30   11.40   11.07
    Tangible book value per share (non-GAAP) (2) 11.01   10.78   10.63   10.73   10.41
                       
    Asset Quality:                  
    30-89 day delinquent loans $ 2,525   $ 2,459   $ 3,694   $ 3,059   $ 3,270
    90 days or more delinquent loans 1,328   2,027   1,301   1,253   2,280
    Total delinquent loans 3,853   4,486   4,995   4,312   5,550
    Total delinquent loans as a percentage of total loans 0.18%   0.22%   0.24%   0.21%   0.27%
    Nonaccrual loans $ 5,752   $ 6,014   $ 5,381   $ 4,873   $ 5,845
    Nonaccrual loans as a percentage of total loans 0.27%   0.29%   0.26%   0.24%   0.29%
    Nonaccrual assets as a percentage of total assets 0.21%   0.22%   0.20%   0.18%   0.23%
    Allowance for credit losses as a percentage of nonaccrual loans 343.06%   327.05%   362.93%   409.50%   332.66%
    Allowance for credit losses as a percentage of total loans 0.94%   0.95%   0.94%   0.97%   0.96%
    Net loan (recoveries) charge-offs $ (585)   $ 29   $ (128)   $ 98   $ 10
    Net loan (recoveries) charge-offs as a percentage of average loans (0.03)%   0.00%   (0.01)%   0.00%   0.00%
    (1) The adjusted efficiency ratio (non-GAAP) represents the ratio of operating expenses divided by the sum of net interest and dividend income and non-interest income, excluding realized and unrealized gains and losses on securities, gains on non-marketable equity investments, and loss on disposal of premises and equipment.
    (2) Tangible book value per share (non-GAAP) represents the value of the Company’s tangible assets divided by its current outstanding shares.

    The following table sets forth the information relating to our average balances and net interest income for the three months ended June 30, 2025, March 31, 2025 and June 30, 2024 and reflects the average yield on interest-earning assets and average cost of interest-bearing liabilities for the periods indicated.

      Three Months Ended
      June 30, 2025   March 31, 2025   June 30, 2024
      Average       Average Yield/   Average       Average Yield/   Average       Average Yield/
      Balance   Interest   Cost(8)   Balance   Interest   Cost(8)   Balance   Interest   Cost(8)
      (Dollars in thousands)
    ASSETS:                                        
    Interest-earning assets                                        
    Loans(1)(2) $ 2,081,319   $ 26,335     5.08 %   $ 2,073,486   $ 25,105     4.91 %   $ 2,017,127   $ 24,454     4.88 %
    Securities(2)   375,074     2,588     2.77       365,371     2,422     2.69       354,850     2,141     2.43  
    Other investments   15,062     169     4.50       14,819     191     5.23       14,328     148     4.15  
    Short-term investments(3)   58,622     641     4.39       76,039     840     4.48       14,328     173     4.86  
    Total interest-earning assets   2,530,077     29,733     4.71       2,529,715     28,558     4.58       2,400,633     26,916     4.51  
    Total non-interest-earning assets   156,247               156,733               156,701          
    Total assets $ 2,686,324             $ 2,686,448             $ 2,557,334          
                                             
    LIABILITIES AND EQUITY:                                        
    Interest-bearing liabilities                                        
    Interest-bearing checking accounts $ 165,329     424     1.03     $ 140,960     250     0.72     $ 131,449     253     0.77  
    Savings accounts   188,498     55     0.12       183,869     40     0.09       185,690     51     0.11  
    Money market accounts   687,621     3,600     2.10       704,215     3,968     2.29       622,062     2,930     1.89  
    Time deposit accounts   690,555     6,358     3.69       702,748     7,118     4.11       650,054     7,101     4.39  
    Total interest-bearing deposits   1,732,003     10,437     2.42       1,731,792     11,376     2.66       1,589,255     10,335     2.62  
    Borrowings   122,070     1,533     5.04       122,786     1,527     5.04       160,484     1,997     5.00  
    Interest-bearing liabilities   1,854,073     11,970     2.59       1,854,578     12,903     2.82       1,749,739     12,332     2.83  
    Non-interest-bearing deposits   572,833               569,638               548,781          
    Other non-interest-bearing liabilities   22,207               25,464               24,453          
    Total non-interest-bearing liabilities   595,040               595,102               573,234          
    Total liabilities   2,449,113               2,449,680               2,322,973          
    Total equity   237,211               236,768               234,361          
    Total liabilities and equity $ 2,686,324             $ 2,686,448             $ 2,557,334          
    Less: Tax-equivalent adjustment(2)       (121 )               (121 )               (114 )      
    Net interest and dividend income     $ 17,642               $ 15,534               $ 14,470        
    Net interest rate spread(4)         2.10 %           1.74 %           1.66 %
    Net interest rate spread, on a tax-equivalent basis(5)         2.12 %           1.76 %           1.67 %
    Net interest margin(6)         2.80 %           2.49 %           2.42 %
    Net interest margin, on a tax-equivalent basis(7)         2.82 %           2.51 %           2.44 %
    Ratio of average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities         136.46 %           136.40 %           137.20 %

    The following tables set forth the information relating to our average balances and net interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2025 and 2024 and reflect the average yield on interest-earning assets and average cost of interest-bearing liabilities for the periods indicated.

      Six Months Ended June 30,
        2025     2024
      Average
    Balance
      Interest   Average Yield/
    Cost(8)
      Average
    Balance
      Interest   Average Yield/
    Cost(8)
     
      (Dollars in thousands)
    ASSETS:                          
    Interest-earning assets                          
    Loans(1)(2) $ 2,077,424   $ 51,440     4.99 %   $ 2,019,420   $ 48,805     4.86 %
    Securities(2)   370,249     5,010     2.73       357,171     4,255     2.40  
    Other investments   14,941     360     4.86       13,411     284     4.26  
    Short-term investments(3)   67,282     1,481     4.44       11,857     286     4.85  
    Total interest-earning assets   2,529,896     58,291     4.65       2,401,859     53,630     4.49  
    Total non-interest-earning assets   156,489               155,555          
    Total assets $ 2,686,385             $ 2,557,414          
                               
    LIABILITIES AND EQUITY:                          
    Interest-bearing liabilities                          
    Interest-bearing checking accounts $ 153,212     674     0.89 %   $ 133,504     488     0.74 %
    Savings accounts   186,196     95     0.10       185,907     90     0.10  
    Money market accounts   695,872     7,569     2.19       624,164     5,517     1.78  
    Time deposit accounts   696,618     13,475     3.90       638,970     13,533     4.26  
    Total interest-bearing deposits   1,731,898     21,813     2.54       1,582,545     19,628     2.49  
    Short-term borrowings and long-term debt   122,426     3,060     5.04       160,643     3,962     4.96  
    Total interest-bearing liabilities   1,854,324     24,873     2.70       1,743,188     23,590     2.72  
    Non-interest-bearing deposits   571,245               553,246          
    Other non-interest-bearing liabilities   23,826               25,672          
    Total non-interest-bearing liabilities   595,071               578,918          
                               
    Total liabilities   2,449,395               2,322,106          
    Total equity   236,990               235,308          
    Total liabilities and equity $ 2,686,385             $ 2,557,414          
    Less: Tax-equivalent adjustment (2)       (242 )               (224 )      
    Net interest and dividend income     $ 33,176               $ 29,816        
    Net interest rate spread (4)         1.92 %           1.75 %
    Net interest rate spread, on a tax-equivalent basis (5)         1.95 %           1.77 %
    Net interest margin (6)         2.64 %           2.50 %
    Net interest margin, on a tax-equivalent basis (7)         2.66 %           2.52 %
    Ratio of average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities       136.43 %           137.79 %
       
    (1) Loans, including nonaccrual loans, are net of deferred loan origination costs and unadvanced funds.  
    (2) Loan and securities income are presented on a tax-equivalent basis using a tax rate of 21%. The tax-equivalent adjustment is deducted from tax-equivalent net interest and dividend income to agree to the amount reported on the consolidated statements of net income.   
    (3) Short-term investments include federal funds sold.   
    (4) Net interest rate spread represents the difference between the weighted average yield on interest-earning assets and the weighted average cost of interest-bearing liabilities.   
    (5) Net interest rate spread, on a tax-equivalent basis, represents the difference between the tax-equivalent weighted average yield on interest-earning assets and the weighted average cost of interest-bearing liabilities.   
    (6) Net interest margin represents net interest and dividend income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets.   
    (7) Net interest margin, on a tax-equivalent basis, represents tax-equivalent net interest and dividend income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets.   
    (8) Annualized.  


    Reconciliation of Non-GAAP to GAAP Financial Measures

    The Company believes that certain non-GAAP financial measures provide information to investors that is useful in understanding its results of operations and financial condition. Because not all companies use the same calculation, this presentation may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures calculated by other companies. A reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures is provided below.

      For the quarter ended
      6/30/2025   3/31/2025   12/31/2024   9/30/2024   6/30/2024
      (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
                       
    Loan interest (no tax adjustment) $ 26,214     $ 24,984     $ 25,183     $ 25,134     $ 24,340  
    Tax-equivalent adjustment   121       121       128       119       114  
    Loan interest (tax-equivalent basis) $ 26,335     $ 25,105     $ 25,311     $ 25,253     $ 24,454  
                       
    Net interest income (no tax adjustment) $ 17,642     $ 15,534     $ 15,273     $ 14,728     $ 14,470  
    Tax equivalent adjustment   121       121       128       119       114  
    Net interest income (tax-equivalent basis) $ 17,763     $ 15,655     $ 15,401     $ 14,847     $ 14,584  
                       
    Net interest income (no tax adjustment) $ 17,642     $ 15,534     $ 15,273     $ 14,728     $ 14,470  
    Less:                  
    Prepayment penalties and fees   425       –       –       –       8  
    Adjusted net interest income (non-GAAP) $ 17,217     $ 15,534     $ 15,273     $ 14,728     $ 14,462  
                       
    Average interest-earning assets $ 2,530,077     $ 2,529,715     $ 2,517,017     $ 2,441,236     $ 2,400,633  
    Net interest margin (no tax adjustment)   2.80 %     2.49 %     2.41 %     2.40 %     2.42 %
    Net interest margin, tax-equivalent   2.82 %     2.51 %     2.43 %     2.42 %     2.44 %
    Net interest margin, excluding prepayment penalties and fees (non-GAAP)   2.73 %     2.49 %     2.41 %     2.40 %     2.42 %
                       
    Book Value per Share (GAAP) $ 11.68     $ 11.44     $ 11.30     $ 11.40     $ 11.07  
    Non-GAAP adjustments:                  
    Goodwill   (0.61 )     (0.60 )     (0.60 )     (0.59 )     (0.58 )
    Core deposit intangible   (0.06 )     (0.06 )     (0.07 )     (0.08 )     (0.08 )
    Tangible Book Value per Share (non-GAAP) $ 11.01     $ 10.78     $ 10.63     $ 10.73     $ 10.41  
                       
      For the quarter ended
      6/30/2025   3/31/2025   12/31/2024   9/30/2024   6/30/2024
      (Dollars in thousands)
                       
    Efficiency Ratio:                  
    Non-interest Expense (GAAP) $ 15,656     $ 15,184     $ 14,926     $ 14,406     $ 14,314  
                       
    Net Interest Income (GAAP) $ 17,642     $ 15,534     $ 15,273     $ 14,728     $ 14,470  
                       
    Non-interest Income (GAAP) $ 3,411     $ 2,759     $ 3,254     $ 3,141     $ 3,834  
    Non-GAAP adjustments:                  
    Unrealized (gains) losses on marketable equity securities   (25 )     5       9       (10 )     (4 )
    Gain on non-marketable equity investments   (243 )     –       (300 )     –       (987 )
    Non-interest Income for Adjusted Efficiency Ratio (non-GAAP) $ 3,143     $ 2,764     $ 2,963     $ 3,131     $ 2,843  
    Total Revenue for Adjusted Efficiency Ratio (non-GAAP) $ 20,785     $ 18,298     $ 18,236     $ 17,859     $ 17,313  
                       
    Efficiency Ratio (GAAP)   74.36 %     83.00 %     80.56 %     80.62 %     78.20 %
                       
    Adjusted Efficiency Ratio (Non-interest Expense (GAAP)/Total Revenue for Adjusted Efficiency Ratio (non-GAAP))   75.32 %     82.98 %     81.85 %     80.67 %     82.68 %
                       
      For the six months ended
      6/30/2025   6/30/2024
      (Dollars in thousands)
           
    Loan income (no tax adjustment) $ 51,198   $ 48,581
    Tax-equivalent adjustment 242   224
    Loan income (tax-equivalent basis) $ 51,440   $ 48,805
           
    Net interest income (no tax adjustment) $ 33,176   $ 29,816
    Tax equivalent adjustment 242   224
    Net interest income (tax-equivalent basis) $ 33,418   $ 30,040
           
    Net interest income (no tax adjustment) $ 33,176   $ 29,816
    Less:      
    Prepayment penalties and fees 425   8
    Adjusted net interest income (non-GAAP) $ 32,751   $ 29,808
           
    Average interest-earning assets $ 2,529,896   $ 2,401,859
    Net interest margin (no tax adjustment) 2.64%   2.50%
    Net interest margin, tax-equivalent 2.66%   2.52%
    Net interest margin, excluding prepayment penalties and fees (non-GAAP) 2.61%   2.50%
           
    Adjusted Efficiency Ratio:      
    Non-interest Expense (GAAP) $ 30,840   $ 29,096
           
    Net Interest Income (GAAP) $ 33,176   $ 29,816
           
    Non-interest Income (GAAP) $ 6,170   $ 6,508
    Non-GAAP adjustments:      
    Unrealized gains on marketable equity securities (20)   (12)
    Loss on disposal of premises and equipment, net –   6
    Gain on non-marketable equity investments (243)   (987)
    Non-interest Income for Adjusted Efficiency Ratio (non-GAAP) $ 5,907   $ 5,515
    Total Revenue for Adjusted Efficiency Ratio (non-GAAP) $ 39,083   $ 35,331
           
    Efficiency Ratio (GAAP) 78.38%   80.10%
           
    Adjusted Efficiency Ratio (Non-interest Expense (GAAP)/Total Revenue for Adjusted Efficiency Ratio (non-GAAP)) 78.91%   82.35%


    For further information contact:

    James C. Hagan, President and CEO
    Guida R. Sajdak, Executive Vice President and CFO
    Meghan Hibner, First Vice President and Investor Relations Officer
    413-568-1911

    The MIL Network –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-Evening Report: Do countries have a duty to prevent climate harm? The world’s highest court is about to answer this crucial question

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Nathan Cooper, Associate Professor of Law, University of Waikato

    Getty Images

    The International Court of Justice (ICJ) will issue a highly anticipated advisory opinion overnight to clarify state obligations related to climate change.

    It will answer two urgent questions: what are the obligations of states under international law to protect the climate and environment from greenhouse gas emissions, and what are the legal consequences for states that have caused significant harm to Earth’s atmosphere and environment?

    ICJ advisory opinions are not legally binding. But coming from the world’s highest court, they provide an authoritative opinion on serious issues that can be highly persuasive.

    This advisory opinion marks the culmination of a campaign that began in 2019 when students and youth organisations in Vanuatu – one of the most vulnerable nations to climate-related impacts – persuaded their government to seek clarification on what states should be doing to protect them.

    Led by Vanuatu and co-sponsored by 132 member states, including New Zealand and Australia, the United Nations General Assembly formally requested the advisory opinion in March 2023.

    More than two years of public consultation and deliberation ensued, leading to this week’s announcement.

    What to expect

    Looking at the specific questions to be addressed, at least three aspects stand out.

    First, the sources and areas of international law under scrutiny are not confined to the UN’s climate change framework. This invites the ICJ to consider a broad range of law – including trans-boundary environmental law, human rights law, international investment law, humanitarian law, trade law and beyond – and to draw on both treaty-related obligations and customary international law.

    Such an encyclopaedic examination could produce a complex and integrated opinion on states’ obligations to protect the environment and climate system.

    Second, the opinion will address what obligations exist, not just to those present today, but to future generations. This follows acknowledgement of the so-called “intertemporal characteristics” of climate change in recent climate-related court decisions and the need to respond effectively to both the current climate crisis and its likely ongoing consequences.

    Third, the opinion won’t just address what obligations states have, but also what the consequences should be for nations:

    where they, by their acts and omissions have caused significant harm to the climate system and other parts of the environment.

    Addressing consequences as well as obligations should cause states to pay closer attention and make the ICJ’s advisory more relevant to domestic climate litigation and policy discussions.

    Representatives from Pacific island nations gathered outside the International Court of Justice during the hearings.
    Michel Porro/Getty Images

    Global judicial direction

    Two recent court findings may offer clues as to the potential scope of the ICJ’s findings.

    Earlier this month, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights published its own advisory opinion on state obligations in response to climate change.

    Explicitly connecting fundamental human rights with a healthy ecosystem, this opinion affirmed states have an imperative duty to prevent irreversible harm to the climate system. Moreover, the duty to safeguard the common ecosystem must be understood as a fundamental principle of international law to which states must adhere.

    Meanwhile last week, an Australian federal court dismissed a landmark climate case, determining that the Australian government does not owe a duty of care to Torres Strait Islanders to protect them from the consequences of climate change.

    The court accepted the claimants face significant loss and damage from climate impacts and that previous Australian government policies on greenhouse gas emissions were not aligned with the best science to limit climate change. But it nevertheless determined that “matters of high or core government policy” are not subject to common law duties of care.

    Whether the ICJ will complement the Inter-American court’s bold approach or opt for a more constrained and conservative response is not certain. But now is the time for clear and ambitious judicial direction with global scope.

    Implications for New Zealand

    Aotearoa New Zealand aspires to climate leadership through its Climate Change Response (Zero Carbon) Amendment Act 2019. This set 2050 targets of reducing emissions of long-lived greenhouse gases (carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide) to net zero, and biogenic methane by 25-47%.

    However, actions to date are likely insufficient to meet this target. Transport emissions continue to rise and agriculture – responsible for nearly half of the country’s emissions – is lightly regulated.

    Although the government plans to double renewable energy by 2050, it is also in the process of lifting a 2018 ban on offshore gas exploration and has pledged $200 million to co-invest in the development of new fields.

    Critics also point out the government has made little progress towards its promise to install 10,000 EV charging stations by 2030 while axing a clean-investment fund.

    Although a final decision is yet to be made, the government is also considering to lower the target for cuts to methane emissions from livestock, against advice from the Climate Change Commission.

    With the next global climate summit coming up in November, the ICJ opinion may offer timely encouragement for states to reconsider their emissions targets and the ambition of climate policies.

    Most countries have yet to submit their latest emissions reduction pledges (known as nationally determined contributions) under the Paris Agreement. New Zealand has made its pledge, but it has been described as “underwhelming”. This may present a chance to adjust ambition upwards.

    If the ICJ affirms that states have binding obligations to prevent climate harm, including trans-boundary impacts, New Zealand’s climate change policies and progress to date could face increased legal scrutiny.

    The authors do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    – ref. Do countries have a duty to prevent climate harm? The world’s highest court is about to answer this crucial question – https://theconversation.com/do-countries-have-a-duty-to-prevent-climate-harm-the-worlds-highest-court-is-about-to-answer-this-crucial-question-261396

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Crapo Statement at Executive Session to Consider USTR, Treasury Nominations

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Idaho Mike Crapo

    Washington, D.C.—U.S. Senate Finance Committee Chairman Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) delivered the following remarks at an executive session to consider the nominations of Joseph Barloon to be a Deputy United States Trade Representative (USTR) and Brian Morrissey, Jr. to be General Counsel for the Department of the Treasury.
    As prepared for delivery:
    “We meet today to consider favorably reporting the nominations of Joe Barloon, who is nominated to serve as Deputy USTR and Ambassador to the World Trade Organization (WTO) and Brian Morrissey, who is nominated to serve as the General Counsel of the Treasury Department.
    “The meeting this morning will provide members with the opportunity to make remarks on the nominees. Following statements, we will recess briefly then proceed to our nominations hearing this morning. Later today, we will notify members of the time and location of the vote on Mr. Barloon and Mr. Morrissey.
    “During his hearing, Mr. Barloon discussed his plan to work in good faith with WTO Members to advance the interests of the United States. Importantly, based on his prior tenure as General Counsel to the U.S. Trade Representative, Mr. Barloon understands the critical role the WTO plays in ensuring market access for our farmers and businesses of all types. If confirmed, Mr. Barloon will work to restore U.S. leadership at the WTO.
    “Building on prior Treasury Department experience, Mr. Morrissey is well-suited to provide critical legal and policy advice to the Secretary and other senior Department officials. He is exceptionally qualified for the position, and his nomination received bipartisan support from Treasury General Counsels dating back to 1977. I was encouraged to hear that he will prioritize a close working relationship with Congress to ensure that the Department effectively implements all laws Congress sends to it.
    “I will vote in favor of both nominations and I encourage all of my colleagues on the Committee to do the same.”
     

    MIL OSI USA News –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Finance Committee Advances USTR, Treasury Nominations

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Idaho Mike Crapo

    Washington, D.C.–The U.S. Senate Finance Committee today advanced the nominations of Joseph Barloon to be a Deputy United States Trade Representative (USTR) and Brian Morrissey, Jr., to be General Counsel for the Department of the Treasury, each by a vote of 14-13. Following the vote, Chairman Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) issued the statement below:
    “Each of the nominees advanced by the Committee today will bring vital experience to their respective roles. Mr. Barloon will work to advance the Unites States’ trade interests at the World Trade Organization as the Administration reestablishes U.S. leadership and will be an incredible advocate for American businesses and farmers. Mr. Morrissey is well-suited to provide critical legal and policy advice to the Secretary and other Treasury officials, and has made it clear he will work closely with Congress to ensure the Department effectively implements all laws. I look forward to each nominee’s confirmation by the full Senate.”
    Executive session information can be found here.
    Read Chairman Crapo’s full statement at the nomination hearing here, and his statement at the executive session here.
     

    MIL OSI USA News –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Crapo Statement at Treasury, HHS Nominations Hearing

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Idaho Mike Crapo
    Washington, D.C.—U.S. Senate Finance Committee Chairman Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) delivered the following remarks at a nomination hearing to consider Jonathan McKernan to be an Under Secretary of the Treasury and Alex Adams of Idaho to be Assistant Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary for Family Support.
    As prepared for delivery:
    “Thank you to our nominees, Mr. McKernan and Dr. Adams, for being here today. Congratulations on your nominations and thank you both for your willingness to serve.
    “Today, we will first hear from Jonathan McKernan who is nominated to serve as the Under Secretary for Domestic Finance at the Treasury Department.
    “The Domestic Finance office develops policies and guidance for Treasury Department activities in areas involving financial institutions, federal debt finance, financial regulation and capital markets. Sensible guidance in these areas better ensures financial stability and the growth and resilience of our economy.
    “Mr. McKernan has a demonstrated track record of support for sound and balanced regulation. As a member of the Board of Directors at the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), Mr. McKernan opposed burdensome rulemakings, such as the Basel III Endgame Proposal, which would have hindered economic growth and reduced lending to households and businesses.
    “He also served in senior advisory roles on the staff of the Senate Banking Committee, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) and the Treasury Department.
    “Mr. McKernan, I look forward to working with you, if confirmed, to bolster and protect our domestic financial system.
    “We will also hear from Dr. Alex Adams–from Eagle, Idaho–who is nominated to serve as the Assistant Secretary for Family Support, which oversees the Administration for Children and Families (ACF) at the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).
    “ACF plays a vital role in supporting some of America’s most vulnerable populations, including foster care and adoption assistance, both of which have garnered bipartisan interest from this Committee. It is imperative that this agency is led by someone with a deep understanding of these complex issues, a commitment to sound fiscal management, and a proven track record of delivering results.
    “Dr. Adams’ service as the Director of Idaho’s Department of Health and Welfare has prepared him to lead ACF. He has overseen a staff of nearly 3,000 individuals and an annual budget of $5.5 billion and delivered clear results for Idahoans.
    “As Director, Dr. Adams placed a strong emphasis on child welfare, working with the Idaho State Legislature to enact laws to extend foster care to age 23, allow kin-specific licensing standards, and enhance time to permanency.
    “Dr. Adams also has a strong record on budget and efficiency, having served as Governor Little’s budget and regulatory director. He has demonstrated a keen eye toward fiscal responsibility, reducing regulatory burden and maximizing the impact of taxpayer dollars. This experience will be invaluable as he oversees the varied programs under ACF’s purview.
    “His nomination has also received letters of support from a broad range of different stakeholders, which I request to be entered into the record.
    “Thank you again to our nominees for their time today.”
     

    MIL OSI USA News –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Indianapolis CPA Sentenced for Participation in Illegal Tax Shelter

    Source: US State of North Dakota

    Defendant Helped Clients in Mississippi and Elsewhere File Returns Claiming False Business Deductions

    An Indiana CPA was sentenced yesterday to three years in prison for assisting in the preparation of false tax returns on behalf of clients who participated in an illegal tax shelter.

    The following is according to court documents and statements made in court: between 2013 and 2022, Jason L. Crace prepared income tax returns for clients that claimed millions of dollars in false deductions for so-called “royalty payments.”  However, as Crace knew, these “royalty payments” were merely circular flows of money designed to give the appearance of genuine business expenses. Typically, a client would send money to bank accounts controlled by scheme promoters who then sent the money — minus a fee — back to a different bank account controlled by the client. In this way, tax shelter participants retained control of the money they transferred, while falsely deducting the transfers as business expenses on their tax returns. One of the scheme’s promoters, Stephen T. Mellinger III, previously pleaded guilty and was sentenced to eight years in prison for his role promoting the scheme.

    In total, Crace’s preparation of false tax returns claiming fraudulent “royalty” deductions caused a loss to the IRS of more than $2.5 million.

    In addition to his prison sentence, the court sentenced Crace to serve one year of supervised release and to pay restitution of $2,532,936.

    Acting Deputy Assistant Attorney General Karen E. Kelly of the Justice Department’s Tax Division and Acting U.S. Attorney Patrick Lemon for the Southern District of Mississippi made the announcement.

    IRS Criminal Investigation is investigating the case.

    Trial Attorneys Richard J. Hagerman, William M. Montague, and Matthew C. Hicks of the Justice Department’s Tax Division and Assistant U.S. Attorney Charles W. Kirkham for the Southern District of Mississippi are prosecuting the case.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Five Defendants Sentenced in Connection with Operating One of the Largest Illegal Television Show Streaming Services in the United States

    Source: US State of North Dakota

    Yesterday, the final judgments were issued for five Nevada men, including a citizen of Germany, who were sentenced on May 29 and 30 to terms of up to 84 months in prison for running Jetflicks, one of the largest illegal television streaming services in the United States.

    “The defendants operated Jetflicks, an illegal paid streaming service that made available more television episodes than any licensed streaming service on the market,” said Acting Assistant Attorney General Matthew R. Galeotti of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division. “This scheme generated millions of dollars in criminal profits, and hurt thousands of U.S. companies and individuals who owned the copyrights to these shows but never received a penny in compensation from Jetflicks. The sentences issued in this case demonstrate the Criminal Division’s commitment to protect American creativity and to ensure that large-scale infringers are brought to justice and punished for their crimes.”

    “Digital crimes are not victimless crimes,” said U.S. Attorney Sigal Chattah for the District of Nevada. “The copyright owners lost millions of dollars as a result of the illegal paid streaming service. These sentences underscore our joint commitment with the Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section and FBI to deter and disrupt intellectual property crime via thorough investigation and prosecution of those who violate federal intellectual property laws.”

    “By building and running one of the largest unauthorized streaming services in the U.S., these individuals not only stole from content creators and legitimate streaming services, they undermined the integrity of our economy and the rule of law,” said Assistant Director Jose A. Perez of the FBI Criminal Investigative Division. “These sentencings are a reminder that illegal actions have consequences. The FBI and our partners are unwavering in our commitment to protect intellectual property rights and hold criminals accountable.”

    After a 14-day trial that ended in June 2024, a federal jury in the District of Nevada convicted Kristopher Lee Dallmann, 42; Peter H. Huber, 67; Jared Edward Jaurequi, also known as Jared Edwards, 44; Felipe Garcia, 43; and Douglas M. Courson, 65, all of Las Vegas, of conspiracy to commit copyright infringement. The jury also convicted Dallmann of criminal copyright infringement by distribution, criminal copyright infringement by public performance, and money laundering. Subsequently, the court sentenced Dallmann to 84 months in prison; Huber to 18 months in prison; Jaurequi to time served (almost 5 months in prison), 180 days of home confinement, and 500 hours of community service; Garcia to three years probation with 49 days in prison and 1000 hours of community service; and Courson to three years probation with 48 days in prison.

    According to court documents and evidence presented at trial, the defendants ran a site called Jetflicks, an online subscription-based service headquartered in Las Vegas, that permitted users to stream and at times download copyrighted television programs without the permission of the relevant copyright owners. At one point, Jetflicks claimed to have 183,285 different television episodes, significantly more than Netflix, Hulu, Vudu, Amazon Prime, or any other licensed streaming service. This was the largest internet piracy case — as measured by the estimated total infringement amount and total number of infringements — ever to go to trial as well as the first illegal streaming case ever to go to trial. The defendants’ conduct harmed every major copyright owner of a television program in the United States. Copyright owners lost millions of dollars from the operation.

    Evidence presented at trial showed that the defendants used automated software and computer scripts that ran constantly to scour sites around the world hosting pirated content. The software and scripts would download, process, and store illegal content, and then make it immediately available on servers in the United States and Canada to tens of thousands of paid subscribers located throughout the United States for streaming and/or downloading. The defendants often delivered episodes to subscribers the day after the shows originally aired on television. The service was not only available to subscribers over the internet but specifically designed to work on many different types of devices, platforms, and software.

    Each defendant performed at least one and often multiple roles at Jetflicks including management, computer programming and coding, design of the website, applications, and customer interface, technical assistance, content acquisition, subscriptions and revenue, and customer support.

    Dallmann reaped millions of dollars in profit from the operation. The government conservatively estimated the value of the copyright infringement in the case at $37.5 million. This included the approximate retail value of the defendants’ reproduction of infringing works to create the Jetflicks inventory as well as the approximate retail value of the streams of pirated television episodes that the defendants provided to subscribers.

    The five defendants sentenced were among eight defendants originally indicted in the Eastern District of Virginia in connection with operating Jetflicks. In addition to the defendants just sentenced in Nevada, defendant Darryl Polo previously pleaded guilty in the Eastern District of Virginia to four counts of criminal copyright infringement and one count of money laundering for his involvement with Jetflicks as well as an equally large illegal streaming site he ran called iStreamItAll. Similarly, defendant Luis Villarino also previously pleaded guilty in the Eastern District of Virginia to conspiracy to commit criminal copyright infringement. In May 2021, a judge in the U.S. District Court for the District of Virginia sentenced Polo and Villarino to, respectively, 57 months in prison and 12 months and a day in prison.

    After the case was transferred to the District of Nevada for trial, defendant Yoany Vaillant was tried separately from the other five remaining defendants. In November 2024, after an eight-day trial, a federal jury convicted Vaillant of conspiracy to commit criminal copyright infringement. Vaillant is scheduled to be sentenced on Sept. 4.

    The FBI Washington Field Office investigated the case, with assistance from the FBI Las Vegas Field Office. 

    Senior Counsel Matthew A. Lamberti, Trial Attorney Michael Christin, and Acting Deputy Chief Christopher S. Merriam of the Criminal Division’s Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section (CCIPS) and Assistant U.S. Attorneys Jessica Oliva and Edward G. Veronda for the District of Nevada are prosecuting the case. The CCIPS Cybercrime Lab, the Justice Department’s Office of International Affairs, and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police in Canada provided significant assistance.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Security: Former Real Estate Podcaster Sentenced to More Than Five Years in Prison for Orchestrating $7 Million Ponzi Scheme

    Source: US FBI

    CLEVELAND – A popular former podcaster was sentenced to 70 months in federal prison for orchestrating a real estate Ponzi scheme that took in over $7.3 million from at least 63 victims from across the United States, involving a wide range of income levels and ages.

    According to court documents, from October 2017 to March 2022, Matthew Motil, 45, of North Olmsted, was a licensed real estate agent in Ohio who owned and operated several companies. He devised a scheme to defraud investors by using his podcast and other marketing tools to position himself as an expert in the field. Branding himself as the “Cash Flow King,” Motil produced and hosted programs which he promoted through social media and his websites. He also authored a book, “Man on Fire,” to further his credibility with investors. Using a combination of marketing tactics, he solicited prospective investors to invest their money with him and his real estate companies as a lucrative way to generate passive income. Motil provided the victim investors with promissory notes he said were secured by mortgages on properties located throughout Northeast Ohio. Unbeknownst to them, he used the same properties over and over to obtain money from one victim after another, each time providing them with a promissory note purportedly secured by a mortgage. Each victim believed that they were the sole mortgage holder of the investment property and that they would be able to recover their investment through foreclosure if Motil failed to make the payments he promised.

    Motil deflected mortgage questions from investors by saying that there were long processing times. As he convinced more people to invest with him, he used those new funds to pay earlier investors to keep the scheme going.

    “These victims were deceived and manipulated into handing over their hard-earned money to a shameless and selfish individual for his own benefit,” said Acting U.S. Attorney Carol M. Skutnik for the Northern District of Ohio.  “Our office will take action to prosecute anyone who preys on the trusting nature of others.” 

    Motil also used the victim investors’ money to fund his lifestyle. He funded personal expenses such as leasing a large home on Lake Erie and securing courtside seats to Cleveland Cavaliers home games. He also used the funds to pay his credit cards and financially sustain his fitness businesses.

    “The 63 victims of this investment/Ponzi scheme are at the forefront of our work, and this conviction reflects our steadfast commitment to justice on their behalf,” said U.S. Secret Service Special Agent in Charge Blaine M. Forschen for the Cleveland Field Office. “Together with our federal, state, and local partners on the Secret Service Money Laundering Task Force, we will continue to protect our communities from those who exploit trust and inflict financial harm.”

    Motil pleaded guilty to securities fraud and wire fraud on Sept. 5, 2024. U.S. District Court Judge Donald C. Nugent imposed the sentence July 18, 2025. Motil was also sentenced to serve three years of supervised release after imprisonment and pay $5,085,247.08 in restitution.

    The investigation was conducted by the United States Secret Service Money Laundering Task Force* with significant assistance from the Cuyahoga County Prosecutor’s Office and the former Major Crime Task Force hosted by the Cuyahoga County Sheriff’s Department.  The Office of the United States Trustee for Region 9 – Cleveland, Ohio, also significantly contributed to the case.

    This case was prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Erica D. Barnhill for the Northern District of Ohio.

    *The United Secret Service Task Force consists of the following agencies: Social Security-OIG, US Postal-OIG, US Postal Inspection Service, USDA-OIG, HUD-OIG, FBI, TIGTA-OIG, IRS-CI, Ohio BCI, Westlake PD, Parma PD, Amherst PD, North Olmsted PD, Cuyahoga County Sheriff’s Department, Cuyahoga County Prosecutor’s Office, Ohio Investigative Unit, Lorain County Sheriff’s Department, Stark County Prosecutor’s Office, Geauga County Prosecutor’s Office, Lorain County Prosecutor’s Office, Ohio Casino Commission, Richfield PD and North Ridgeville PD.

    MIL Security OSI –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Security: Five Defendants Sentenced in Connection with Operating One of the Largest Illegal Television Show Streaming Services in the United States

    Source: United States Attorneys General

    Yesterday, the final judgments were issued for five Nevada men, including a citizen of Germany, who were sentenced on May 29 and 30 to terms of up to 84 months in prison for running Jetflicks, one of the largest illegal television streaming services in the United States.

    “The defendants operated Jetflicks, an illegal paid streaming service that made available more television episodes than any licensed streaming service on the market,” said Acting Assistant Attorney General Matthew R. Galeotti of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division. “This scheme generated millions of dollars in criminal profits, and hurt thousands of U.S. companies and individuals who owned the copyrights to these shows but never received a penny in compensation from Jetflicks. The sentences issued in this case demonstrate the Criminal Division’s commitment to protect American creativity and to ensure that large-scale infringers are brought to justice and punished for their crimes.”

    “Digital crimes are not victimless crimes,” said U.S. Attorney Sigal Chattah for the District of Nevada. “The copyright owners lost millions of dollars as a result of the illegal paid streaming service. These sentences underscore our joint commitment with the Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section and FBI to deter and disrupt intellectual property crime via thorough investigation and prosecution of those who violate federal intellectual property laws.”

    “By building and running one of the largest unauthorized streaming services in the U.S., these individuals not only stole from content creators and legitimate streaming services, they undermined the integrity of our economy and the rule of law,” said Assistant Director Jose A. Perez of the FBI Criminal Investigative Division. “These sentencings are a reminder that illegal actions have consequences. The FBI and our partners are unwavering in our commitment to protect intellectual property rights and hold criminals accountable.”

    After a 14-day trial that ended in June 2024, a federal jury in the District of Nevada convicted Kristopher Lee Dallmann, 42; Peter H. Huber, 67; Jared Edward Jaurequi, also known as Jared Edwards, 44; Felipe Garcia, 43; and Douglas M. Courson, 65, all of Las Vegas, of conspiracy to commit copyright infringement. The jury also convicted Dallmann of criminal copyright infringement by distribution, criminal copyright infringement by public performance, and money laundering. Subsequently, the court sentenced Dallmann to 84 months in prison; Huber to 18 months in prison; Jaurequi to time served (almost 5 months in prison), 180 days of home confinement, and 500 hours of community service; Garcia to three years probation with 49 days in prison and 1000 hours of community service; and Courson to three years probation with 48 days in prison.

    According to court documents and evidence presented at trial, the defendants ran a site called Jetflicks, an online subscription-based service headquartered in Las Vegas, that permitted users to stream and at times download copyrighted television programs without the permission of the relevant copyright owners. At one point, Jetflicks claimed to have 183,285 different television episodes, significantly more than Netflix, Hulu, Vudu, Amazon Prime, or any other licensed streaming service. This was the largest internet piracy case — as measured by the estimated total infringement amount and total number of infringements — ever to go to trial as well as the first illegal streaming case ever to go to trial. The defendants’ conduct harmed every major copyright owner of a television program in the United States. Copyright owners lost millions of dollars from the operation.

    Evidence presented at trial showed that the defendants used automated software and computer scripts that ran constantly to scour sites around the world hosting pirated content. The software and scripts would download, process, and store illegal content, and then make it immediately available on servers in the United States and Canada to tens of thousands of paid subscribers located throughout the United States for streaming and/or downloading. The defendants often delivered episodes to subscribers the day after the shows originally aired on television. The service was not only available to subscribers over the internet but specifically designed to work on many different types of devices, platforms, and software.

    Each defendant performed at least one and often multiple roles at Jetflicks including management, computer programming and coding, design of the website, applications, and customer interface, technical assistance, content acquisition, subscriptions and revenue, and customer support.

    Dallmann reaped millions of dollars in profit from the operation. The government conservatively estimated the value of the copyright infringement in the case at $37.5 million. This included the approximate retail value of the defendants’ reproduction of infringing works to create the Jetflicks inventory as well as the approximate retail value of the streams of pirated television episodes that the defendants provided to subscribers.

    The five defendants sentenced were among eight defendants originally indicted in the Eastern District of Virginia in connection with operating Jetflicks. In addition to the defendants just sentenced in Nevada, defendant Darryl Polo previously pleaded guilty in the Eastern District of Virginia to four counts of criminal copyright infringement and one count of money laundering for his involvement with Jetflicks as well as an equally large illegal streaming site he ran called iStreamItAll. Similarly, defendant Luis Villarino also previously pleaded guilty in the Eastern District of Virginia to conspiracy to commit criminal copyright infringement. In May 2021, a judge in the U.S. District Court for the District of Virginia sentenced Polo and Villarino to, respectively, 57 months in prison and 12 months and a day in prison.

    After the case was transferred to the District of Nevada for trial, defendant Yoany Vaillant was tried separately from the other five remaining defendants. In November 2024, after an eight-day trial, a federal jury convicted Vaillant of conspiracy to commit criminal copyright infringement. Vaillant is scheduled to be sentenced on Sept. 4.

    The FBI Washington Field Office investigated the case, with assistance from the FBI Las Vegas Field Office. 

    Senior Counsel Matthew A. Lamberti, Trial Attorney Michael Christin, and Acting Deputy Chief Christopher S. Merriam of the Criminal Division’s Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section (CCIPS) and Assistant U.S. Attorneys Jessica Oliva and Edward G. Veronda for the District of Nevada are prosecuting the case. The CCIPS Cybercrime Lab, the Justice Department’s Office of International Affairs, and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police in Canada provided significant assistance.

    MIL Security OSI –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Wyden, Colleagues Investigate Skydance’s Role in Potential Secret Trump Payoff Connected to Paramount Deal

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Ron Wyden (D-Ore)

    July 22, 2025

    With Skydance/Paramount merger pending, Skydance reportedly set up secret side deal with Trump worth tens of millions more dollars

    Washington, D.C. – U.S. Senator Ron Wyden, D-Ore., pressed Skydance Media about reports of a secret deal between Skydance and Donald Trump that may be related to Paramount’s recent multi-million-dollar settlement agreement with the Trump administration, in a letter with Senate colleagues.

    Skydance and Paramount are awaiting approval from the Trump administration on their proposed mega-merger, raising concerns about potential bribery related to the deal. In May, following reports of a potential settlement in Paramount’s legal battle with Trump, the senators wrote to the company with concerns that its attempt to settle Trump’s “meritless” lawsuit for tens of millions of dollars, while approval for its $8 billion merger with Skydance is pending in front of the Trump administration, could be construed as bribery.

    “These reports raise fresh questions about corruption in the Trump administration and President Trump’s willingness to accept payments from entities with significant policy interests before agencies he controls,” the senators wrote in a letter to Skydance Media CEO David Ellison.

    Despite warnings from senators that the deal resembled back-door bribery, Paramount reached a $16 million settlement with Trump, a portion of which will go towards his presidential library. Moving funds to the presidential library offers a discrete way for Trump to collect money under the appearance of ‘contributions’. It was later revealed that the arrangement exceeds the original $16 million. The arrangement may involve public service announcements and other broadcast content promoting conservative causes, potentially worth an additional $15 to $20 million – leading to reports of a back-door deal with Skydance. Consequences could include CBS’ decision to cancel The Late Show with Stephen Colbert just days after he publicly criticized Paramount’s settlement.

    Along with Wyden, the letter was led by Senators Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., and Bernie Sanders, I-Vt.

    To understand whether Skydance’s actions complied with federal anti-bribery laws, the senators are requesting answers to the following questions by August 4.

    1. Is there currently any arrangement under which you or Skydance will provide compensation, advertising, or promotional activities that in any way assist Trump, his family, his presidential library, or other Administration officials?
    2. Have you personally discussed with Trump, any of his family members, any Trump administration officials, or presidential library fund personnel any matters related to the Paramount-Skydance transaction? If so, what was the nature of these discussions?
    3. Were you or any other Skydance executives involved in discussions about settling Trump’s lawsuit against CBS? If so, please provide information regarding the timing, nature of, and participants in these discussions, including whether the pending transaction with Paramount was discussed.
    4. Has Skydance agreed or have you personally agreed to make changes to Skydance’s content or Paramount’s or CBS’s content at the request of the Trump administration, to facilitate approval of the transaction? If so, please describe those requests.
    5. Were you or other Skydance executives involved in discussions about canceling The Late Show with Stephen Colbert? If so, please provide information regarding the timing, nature of, and participants in these discussions, including whether the pending transaction with Paramount was discussed.
    6. Does Skydance have any policies, procedures, or guidance related to compliance with 18 U.S.C. 201 or any other laws governing public corruption? If so, please provide a copy of those policies and procedures.
    7. Does Skydance conduct any training for its staff or executives related to compliance with 18 U.S.C. 201 or any other laws governing public corruption? If so, please provide details regarding these trainings.

    In a move to amass more money under the guise of ‘contributions’, at least part of Paramount’s $16 million settlement will go towards Trump’s presidential library. Wyden joined his colleagues to introduce legislation in the Senate and House that would close loopholes allowing presidential libraries to be used as tools for corruption and bribery, including Trump’s potential back-door deal with Skydance.

    The full text of the letter is here.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Warner & Colleagues Demand Answers from Delta on Use of AI to Set Individualized Ticket Prices

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Commonwealth of Virginia Mark R Warner

    WASHINGTON – Today, U.S. Sen. Mark R. Warner (D-VA) along with his colleagues Sens. Ruben Gallego (D-AZ) and Richard Blumental (D-CT) led their colleagues in demanding answers from Delta Air Lines CEO Ed Bastian after the company announced that it plans to ramp up its use of Artificial Intelligence to set surveillance-based ticket prices.

    “Individualized pricing, or surveillance-based price setting, eliminates a fixed or static price in favor of prices that are tailored to an individual consumer’s willingness to pay. Delta’s current and planned individualized pricing practices not only present data privacy concerns, but will also likely mean fare price increases up to each individual consumer’s personal “pain point” at a time when American families are already struggling with rising costs,” wrote the senators. “The technology making that determination is trained using “all the data we can get our hands on” according to Fetcherr CEO Roy Cohen, and the company’s website claims that AI adoption and usage could increase aviation industry profits by up to $4.4 trillion annually.”

    “The implications for individual consumer privacy are severe on their own. Surveillance pricing has been shown to utilize extensive personal information obtained through a variety of thirdparty channels, including data about a passenger’s purchase history, web browsing behavior, geolocation, social media activity, biometric data, and financial status,” they continued. “Former FTC Chair Lina Khan has cautioned against a particularly egregious but conceivable example of an airline using AI to charge a higher fare to a passenger ‘because the company knows that they just had a death in the family and need to fly across the country.’” 

    In the letter, the senators demanded answers on the company’s plans to protect Americans from pricing discrimination. They also requested answers to a series of questions around the types and sources of data Delta will use to train this AI system, how many passengers and which routes will be impacted, and what steps the company has taken to ensure compliance will follow all applicable federal and state laws.

    The full text of the letter is available here.

     

    MIL OSI USA News –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Africa: South Africa: National Assembly Adopts the 2025 Revenue Laws Amendment Bill

    Source: APO


    .

    The National Assembly (NA) today approved the Revenue Laws Amendment Bill, which marks a significant step in the country’s retirement reform agenda.

    The Bill proposes changes to several tax laws. It is categorised as a Money Bill, processed under Section 77 of the Constitution and follows extensive consultations led by the Standing Committee on Finance.

    The Bill is part of necessary legislative reforms to support the implementation of the two-pot retirement system, which aims to give individuals limited early access to a portion of their retirement savings while preserving the remainder for retirement. The system was implemented in September 2024, and the amendments will provide much-needed clarity for retirement fund members and administrators. The Bill, among other things, clarifies terms like “retirement annuity fund” within the broader legislative context, although some terminology issues will need to be addressed in future updates.

    The National Treasury published the draft bill in December 2024. This was followed by extensive public participation in Parliament’s Standing Committee on Finance, where public input was received from June 2025 onwards.

    With the National Assembly’s approval, the Bill will now be sent to the National Council of Provinces for further consideration.

    The full committee report (dated July 18, 2025) can be accessed using this link: https://tinyurl.com/3wp2uapb

    Distributed by APO Group on behalf of Republic of South Africa: The Parliament.

    MIL OSI Africa –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Africa: Fostering Digital Villages Initiative showcases innovation at agricultural shows in Zimbabwe

    Source: APO

    The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) in collaboration with the Mhondoro-Ngezi District Agricultural Show Society, successfully hosted a ‘Digital Fair’ in the Mashonaland West Province in Zimbabwe. The Digital Fair was held under the auspices of the Fostering Digital Villages Initiative (FDiVi).

    This strategic blending of digital innovation with traditional agricultural exhibitions marks a significant step in Zimbabwe’s journey towards agrifood systems transformation as it showcases tools and services that significantly improves the efficiency and effectiveness of agricultural practices.

    The event served as a dynamic platform to introduce digital service providers to rural communities, enabling farmers, youth, and local leaders to explore and evaluate digital tools tailored for agricultural productivity and rural development. The digital fair is part of the broader global FAO Digital Villages Initiative, which aims to transform agrifood systems in rural Malawi, Rwanda, and Zimbabwe using effective digital technologies, including artificial intelligence.

    Digital Fairs are platforms for raising awareness as well as conduits for digital literacy for rural communities on one hand and rural market entry points for digital service providers, innovators and entrepreneurs.

    “Collaborating with Agricultural Show Societies is a step in the right direction. The success of the digital fair in the Mhondoro-Ngezi where we partnered the Mhondoro-Ngezi District Agricultural Society sets the stage for future integration of digital fairs into national and sub-national agricultural shows, amplifying outreach and fostering inclusive access to innovation,” said Patrice Talla, FAO Subregional Coordinator for Southern Africa and Representative to Zimbabwe.

    “This approach aligns with Zimbabwe’s broader goals for sustainable agriculture, youth empowerment, and rural development, and is more sustainable,” added Talla.

    “The Venice Digital Fair has been overwhelmingly welcomed by the Mhondoro-Ngezi farmers, extension staff and stakeholders, with a lot of interest shown on the services that were being exhibited. We wish to continue to synchronize our future agricultural shows with these digital fairs as this has shown a positive impact on attendance, knowledge sharing and exchange.” said Spiwe Goto an extension officer with the Ministry of Lands, Agriculture, Fisheries, Water and Rural Development.

    The digital fair brought together a wide range of stakeholders, including Government officials; digital service providers; local traditional leaders and community members; and youth organizations, rural development groups, and digital champions.

    “I have learnt a lot through being part of this initiative. Digital innovation isn’t just for urban centres. It’s for every farmer, every youth, and every rural entrepreneur ready to grow. We’re building bridges between technology and tradition,” Maria Chinyoka a Digital Champion trained under the FDiVi project who is also the Kushinga farmer group leader.

    The Digital Fair delivered tangible results, reinforcing the value of integrating digital innovation into Zimbabwe’s agrifood systems. The digital fair contributed to increased awareness of digital tools among rural stakeholders, showcasing their potential to drive agricultural productivity and rural transformation. It also strengthened engagement between digital innovators and grassroots communities, fostering collaboration and knowledge exchange.

    “These series of Fairs are a vital bridge between us as digital innovators and grassroot communities that we often overlook in tech-driven agriculture” said Tafadzwa Chikwereti (Co-founder of eAgro).

    “As a financial institution, we witnessed opportunities for our company to penetrate the under-banked community. We will be partnering with local agents to offer our micro-finance services,” Kanukai Madende the Managing Director of Village Finance.

    The digital fair enhanced the visibility of digital solutions within sub-national agricultural platforms, laying the groundwork for broader adoption and policy integration. FAO remains committed to supporting Zimbabwe’s digital transformation journey, ensuring that no community is left behind in the pursuit of modern, resilient, and inclusive agrifood systems.

    Distributed by APO Group on behalf of Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO): Regional Office for Africa.

    Media files

    .

    MIL OSI Africa –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Africa: Ethiopia: Ministry of Finance Launches First-Ever Issuance Calendar for Treasury (T)-Bills

    Source: APO


    .

    As part of ongoing efforts to reform and modernize public finance management and to foster market-based deficit financing through domestic-currency Treasury bills and bonds market, the Ministry of Finance has published its first three-month Treasury-bill issuance calendar.

    This milestone supports the government’s “reset, reform, and relaunch” agenda, deepening the domestic debt market and improving transparency. By giving market participants clear visibility of upcoming auctions, the calendar enhances predictability and builds investor confidence. It also underscores the government’s commitment to borrow domestically in ways that limit inflation and safeguard macroeconomic stability.

    The calendar embodies the shift toward a genuinely market-based approach to Treasury-bill issuance. This compliments the opening of the secondary market and the introduction of more competitive retail auctions open to a wider range of investors through the Ethiopian Securities Exchange.

    The Ministry of Finance will continue to build on this momentum by promoting openness, broadening investor participation, and aligning Ethiopia’s debt-management practices with international best practice.

    Distributed by APO Group on behalf of Ministry of Finance, Ethiopia.

    MIL OSI Africa –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: UK-Egypt Strategic Partnership: 22 July 2025

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Press release

    UK-Egypt Strategic Partnership: 22 July 2025

    A Strategic Partnership between the UK and Egyptian governments.

    The UK and Egypt share deep, historic ties. We partner across multiple fields, from climate change to global security, trade and investment to tourism, underpinned by rich people-to-people and cultural connections. However, both countries aspire to strengthen this co-operation in pursuit of shared prosperity and greater regional and global security.

    The Governments of Egypt and the UK have therefore committed to elevating the bilateral relationship to a Strategic Partnership. This commitment marks a significant milestone and will enable both governments to strengthen and systematise existing collaboration in line with shared interests and priorities such as trade and investment, irregular migration, regional security and responding to the humanitarian crisis in Gaza.

    The UK and Egypt will launch the Strategic Partnership during a visit to Cairo by the Prime Minister in the autumn of 2025. To unlock new mutual growth opportunities and strengthen economic ties, the Prime Minister and President Sisi will jointly chair an Investment Conference convening key British and Egyptian businesses.

    The UK Government looks forward to building the Strategic Partnership with Egypt to enhance the prosperity and security of our citizens.

    Share this page

    The following links open in a new tab

    • Share on Facebook (opens in new tab)
    • Share on Twitter (opens in new tab)

    Updates to this page

    Published 22 July 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA News: Joint Statement on Framework for United States-Indonesia Agreement on Reciprocal Trade

    Source: US Whitehouse

    Today, the United States of America (the United States) and the Republic of Indonesia (Indonesia) agreed to a Framework for negotiating an Agreement on Reciprocal Trade to strengthen our bilateral economic relationship, which will provide both countries’ exporters unprecedented access to each other’s markets.  The Agreement on Reciprocal Trade will build upon our longstanding economic relationship, including the U.S.-Indonesia Trade and Investment Framework Agreement, signed on July 16, 1996.

    Key terms of the Agreement on Reciprocal Trade between the United States and Indonesia will include:

    • Indonesia will eliminate approximately 99 percent of tariff barriers for a full range of U.S. industrial and U.S. food and agricultural products exported to Indonesia.
    • The United States will reduce to 19 percent the reciprocal tariffs, as set forth in Executive Order 14257 of April 2, 2025, on originating goods of Indonesia, and may also identify certain commodities that are not naturally available or domestically produced in the United States for a further reduction in the reciprocal tariff rate.
    • The United States and Indonesia will negotiate facilitative rules of origin that ensure that the benefits of the agreement accrue primarily to the United States and Indonesia.
    • The United States and Indonesia will work together to address Indonesia’s non-tariff barriers that affect bilateral trade and investment in priority areas, including exempting U.S. companies and originating goods from local content requirements; accepting vehicles built to U.S. federal motor vehicle safety and emissions standards; accepting FDA certificates and prior marketing authorizations for medical devices and pharmaceuticals; removing certain labeling requirements; exempting U.S. exports of cosmetics, medical devices, and other manufactured goods from certain requirements; taking steps to resolve many long-standing intellectual property issues identified in USTR’s Special 301 Report; and addressing U.S. concerns with conformity assessment procedures.  Indonesia will work to address barriers for U.S. exports, including through the removal of import restrictions or licensing requirements on U.S. remanufactured goods or their parts; the elimination of pre-shipment inspection or verification requirements on imports of U.S. goods; and the adoption and implementation of good regulatory practices.
    • The United States and Indonesia have also committed to address and prevent barriers to U.S. food and agricultural products in the Indonesian market, including exempting U.S. food and agricultural products from all import licensing regimes, including commodity balance requirements; ensuring transparency and fairness with respect to geographical indications; providing permanent Fresh Food of Plant Origin (FFPO) designation for all applicable U.S. plant products; and recognizing U.S. regulatory oversight, including listing of all U.S. meat, poultry, and dairy facilities and accepting certificates issued by U.S. regulatory authorities. 
    • Indonesia has committed to address barriers impacting digital trade, services, and investment.  Indonesia will provide certainty regarding the ability to transfer personal data out of its territory to the United States.  Indonesia has committed to eliminate existing HTS tariff lines on “intangible products” and suspend related requirements on import declarations; to support a permanent moratorium on customs duties on electronic transmissions at the WTO immediately and without conditions; and to take effective actions to implement the Joint Initiative on Services Domestic Regulation, including submitting its revised Specific Commitments for certification by the World Trade Organization (WTO).
    • Indonesia commits to join the Global Forum on Steel Excess Capacity and take effective actions to address global excess capacity in the steel sector and its impacts.
    • Indonesia commits to protecting internationally recognized labor rights.  Indonesia will, among other commitments, adopt and implement a prohibition on the importation of goods produced by forced or compulsory labor; amend its labor laws to ensure that workers’ rights to freedom of association and collective bargaining are fully protected; and strengthen enforcement of its labor laws.
    • Indonesia commits to adopt and maintain high levels of environmental protection and to effectively enforce its environmental laws, including by taking measures to improve forest sector governance and combat trade in illegally harvested forest products; encourage a more resource efficient economy; accept and fully implement the WTO Agreement on Fisheries Subsidies; and combat illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing and illegal wildlife trade.
    • Indonesia will remove restrictions on exports to the United States of industrial commodities, including critical minerals.
    • The United States and Indonesia are committed to strengthening economic and national security cooperation to enhance supply chain resilience and innovation through complementary actions to address unfair trade practices of other countries, and through cooperation on export controls, investment security, and combatting duty evasion.
    • In addition, the United States and Indonesia take note of the following forthcoming commercial deals between U.S. and Indonesian companies:
      • Procurement of aircraft currently valued at 3.2 billion USD.
      • Purchase of agriculture products, including soybeans, soybeans meal, wheat, and cotton with an estimated total value of 4.5 billion USD.
      • Purchases of energy products, including liquefied petroleum gas, crude oil, and gasoline, with an estimated value of 15 billion USD.

    In the coming weeks, the United States and Indonesia will negotiate and finalize the Agreement on Reciprocal Trade, prepare the Agreement for signature, and undertake domestic formalities in advance of the Agreement entering into force.  

    MIL OSI USA News –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA News: Fact Sheet: The United States and Indonesia Reach Historic Trade Deal

    Source: US Whitehouse

    DELIVERING ON RECIPROCAL TRADE: President Donald J. Trump announced a landmark trade deal with Indonesia that will provide Americans with market access in Indonesia once considered impossible and unlock major breakthroughs for America’s manufacturing, agriculture, and digital sectors.

    • Under this deal, Indonesia will pay the United States a reciprocal tariff rate of 19%.
    • The key terms of the U.S.-Indonesia Agreement on Reciprocal Trade will include:
      • Eliminating Tariff Barriers: Indonesia will eliminate tariff barriers, on a preferential basis, on over 99% of U.S. products exported to Indonesia across all sectors, including for all agricultural products, health products, seafood, information and communications technology, automotive products, and chemicals, which will create commercially meaningful market access opportunities for the full range of U.S. exports, supporting high-quality American jobs.
      • Breaking Down Non-Tariff Barriers for U.S. Industrial Exports: Indonesia will address a range of non-tariff barriers, including by: (1) exempting U.S. companies and originating goods from local content requirements; (2) accepting vehicles built to U.S. federal motor vehicle safety and emissions standards; (3) accepting FDA certificates and prior marketing authorizations for medical devices and pharmaceuticals; (4) exempting U.S. exports of cosmetics, medical devices, and other manufactured goods from burdensome certification and labeling requirements; (5) removing import restrictions or licensing requirements on U.S. remanufactured goods and their parts; (6) eliminating pre-shipment inspection or verification requirements on imports of U.S. goods; (7) adopting and implementing good regulatory practices; (8) taking steps to resolve many long-standing intellectual property issues identified in USTR’s Special 301 Report; and (9) addressing U.S. concerns with conformity assessment procedures.
      • Breaking Down Non-Tariff Barriers for U.S. Agriculture Exports: Indonesia will address and prevent barriers to U.S. agricultural products in the Indonesian market, including by: (1) exempting U.S. food and agricultural products from all of Indonesia’s import licensing regimes including its commodity balance policy; (2) ensuring transparency and fairness with respect to geographical indications (GIs) including meats and cheeses; (3) providing permanent Fresh Food of Plant Origin (FFPO) designation for all applicable U.S. plant products; and (4) recognizing U.S. regulatory oversight, including listing of all U.S. meat, poultry, and dairy facilities and accepting certificates issued by U.S. regulatory authorities.
      • Strengthening Rules of Origin: The United States and Indonesia will negotiate facilitative rules of origin that ensure that the benefits from the agreement accrue to the United States and Indonesia, not third-countries.
      • Removing Barriers for Digital Trade: The United States and Indonesia will finalize commitments on digital trade, services, and investment. Indonesia has committed to eliminate existing HTS tariff lines on “intangible products” and suspend related requirements on import declarations; support a permanent moratorium on customs duties on electronic transmissions at the World Trade Organization (WTO) immediately and without conditions; and take effective actions to implement the Joint Initiative on Services Domestic Regulation, including submitting its revised Specific Commitments for certification by the WTO. Indonesia will provide certainty regarding the ability to move personal data out of its territory to the United States through recognition of the United States as a country or jurisdiction that provides adequate data protection under Indonesia’s law. American companies have sought these reforms for years.
      • Aligning on Economic Security: Indonesia has committed to join the Global Forum on Steel Excess Capacity and take effective actions to address global excess capacity in the steel sector and its impacts. The United States and Indonesia are committed to strengthening cooperation to increase supply chain resilience. This includes addressing duty evasion and cooperating on export controls and investment security. Indonesia will remove restrictions on exports to the United States for all industrial commodities, including critical minerals.
      • Improving Labor Standards: Indonesia has committed to adopt and implement a forced labor import ban and remove provisions that restrict workers and unions from exercising freedom of association and collective bargaining rights.
      • Notching Commercial Deals: The United States and Indonesia take note of commercial deals in the areas of agriculture, aerospace, and energy, which will further increase U.S. exports to Indonesia.
    • President Trump has delivered a forward-looking and tough trade deal that will benefit American workers, exporters, farmers, and digital innovators—this deal is what winning looks and will feel like for all Americans.

    A DEFINED PATH FORWARD: In the coming weeks, the United States and Indonesia will memorialize the Agreement on Reciprocal Trade in order to lock in benefits for American businesses and workers.

    • The United States currently runs its fifteenth largest goods trade deficit with Indonesia.
      • The U.S. total goods trade deficit with Indonesia was $17.9 billion in 2024.
      • Before this deal, Indonesia’s simple average applied tariff was 8% while the U.S. average applied tariff was 3.3%. 

    LIBERATING AMERICA FROM UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES: Since Day One, President Trump challenged the assumption that American workers and businesses must tolerate unfair trade practices that have disadvantaged them for decades and contributed to our historic trade deficit.

    • On April 2, President Trump declared a national emergency in response to the large and persistent U.S. goods trade deficit caused by a lack of reciprocity in our bilateral trade relationships, unfair tariff and non-tariff barriers, and U.S. trading partners’ economic policies that suppress domestic wages and consumption.
    • President Trump continues to advance the economic and national security interests of the American people by removing tariff and non-tariff barriers and expanding market access for American exporters.
    • Today’s announcement shows that America can defend its domestic production and strengthen its defense industrial base while obtaining expansive market access with our trading partners.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Supporting Water Infrastructure Security and Resilience

    Source: US State of New York

    overnor Kathy Hochul today announced a key milestone to safeguard New York’s water infrastructure by developing nation-leading cybersecurity regulations for water and wastewater systems alongside a new cyber grant program and technical assistance to bolster the security and resilience of water and wastewater systems. Following a collaborative multi-agency development process directed by her 2025 State of the State, the New York State Department of Health (DOH) and New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) released proposed cyber regulations for water and wastewater systems for public comment. In coordination, the Department of Public Service (DPS) also released proposed cyber regulations across water-works corporations, other public utilities, and cable television companies for public comment. The Environmental Facilities Corporation (EFC) is also establishing a new cyber grant program and technical assistance for the water and wastewater systems sector. These threat-informed, risk-centric, and cost-balanced minimum standards and accompanying funding and technical assistance will strengthen the cybersecurity posture of water utilities and protect them from increasingly sophisticated and dangerous cyber attacks.

    “Cyber attacks on critical infrastructure can have devastating impacts on communities, and we must act now to defend our water and wastewater systems with the same urgency and rigor we bring to other critical sectors,” Governor Hochul said. “These new regulations and grant programs reflect our commitment to protecting public health and safety while helping under-resourced entities modernize for a digital age.”

    The agencies worked together to closely align definitions and provisions within each agency’s regulatory and operational requirements, worked to minimize duplicative or conflicting requirements, and streamlined processes. They also aligned regulations with guidance issued by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency for securing information technology and operational technology environments.

    Regulated water and wastewater systems will be required to evaluate risks, deploy cybersecurity controls, and implement network monitoring and logging for the largest systems. Regulated entities will also be required to develop and maintain response and recovery plans to support continuity of operations in the event of cyber attacks and to report cybersecurity incidents.

    Governor Hochul secured another $500 million for clean water infrastructure in this year’s budget, bringing the state’s total investment to $6 billion since 2017. In addition to these investments, $2.5 million in the FY26 Budget funds a new cyber grant program, Strengthening Essential Cybersecurity for Utilities and Resiliency Enhancements (SECURE), dedicated to the water and wastewater sector. This new grant program will provide competitive grants to support cybersecurity risk assessments and hardening efforts focused on and aligned with the new proposed regulatory requirements. The grant opportunities assist water systems by providing them with the needed resources to strengthen their cybersecurity posture, enhance resiliency, and ensure reliable delivery of clean water for New Yorkers.

    Governor Hochul is again expanding the Community Assistance Teams to provide free, expert guidance and tools to help water systems implement cybersecurity best practices in a way that is cost-effective and sustainable. Communities can continue to request a one-on-one consultation with the Teams about their water infrastructure needs, now including cybersecurity. A new Cybersecurity Hub is now available on the EFC’S website to help communities immediately start fortifying their systems. The hub provides training opportunities, recommended actions, and additional resources. This hub will be regularly updated. Communities can continue to request consultations about their water infrastructure needs on the EFC’s website.

    The public release by DOH, DEC, and PSC of the proposed regulations marks the latest step in strengthening the reliability and resilience of New York’s water and wastewater systems. DEC will accept public comments until September 3, 2025; DOH until September 14, 2025; and PSC until September 14, 2025. Once adopted, regulated entities will have until January 1, 2027 to comply with DEC and DOH regulations focused on operational technology and until January 1, 2026 to comply with PSC regulations focused on information technology.

    New York State Chief Cyber Officer Colin Ahern said, “As cyber threats to infrastructure continue to rise, these regulations will help water and wastewater system operators better defend against attacks that could disrupt service, threaten public health, or damage trust. We look forward to reviewing public feedback received by all three agencies before finalizing the regulations to support increased resilience and reliability for New York’s water and wastewater systems.”

    New York State Environmental Facilities Corporation President and CEO Maureen A. Coleman said, “In today’s digital world, we must defend our water and wastewater utilities from cyber attacks that cost money, time, and valuable resources – and can potentially halt water services and threaten public health and the environment. That’s why we’re helping local water systems strengthen their cybersecurity while keeping costs down for communities and ratepayers. Governor Hochul’s initiative reflects New York’s leadership in both cybersecurity and environmental protection, and I’m proud that we are taking swift action to protect our communities.”

    New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Commissioner Amanda Lefton said, “Thanks to Governor Hochul’s leadership, DEC is proactively enhancing cybersecurity across our wastewater systems to safeguard our environment, public health, and our nation leading investments in this critical infrastructure. DEC is committed to partnering with state agencies and local governments to protect the communities that rely on these essential services every day from cybersecurity threats.”

    New York State Public Service Commission Chair Rory M. Christian said, “Cybersecurity threats to critical infrastructure are growing in number, intensity, and sophistication. One area of concern is Information Technology (IT). IT systems are utilized across all entities regulated by the Commission and a breach of IT cybersecurity can result in the dissemination of private customer data as well as substantial financial losses to companies. Protection of ratepayers and consumers from cybercriminals is a key reason to pursue stringent IT security for all regulated entities that interact with the public, including gas, electric, telecom, steam, and water providers.”

    New York State Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Services Commissioner Jackie Bray said, “As we move further into the digital age, it’s essential we remain laser-focused on strengthening the cyber security of critical infrastructure. Thanks to the leadership of Governor Hochul, the release of these new regulations and grants not only help ensure the security and resilience of water systems in New York, but are charting a path for the rest of the nation to follow.”

    New York State Chief Information Officer and Director of the Office of Information Technology Services Dru Rai said, “If we are committed to having the strongest and most robust cybersecurity protections possible, it will take all of us working together in pursuit of that goal. Thanks to Governor Hochul’s exemplary leadership and establishment of the Joint Security Operations Center, New York is already doing more than ever before to defend state agencies and local governments from a wide array of dangerous cyber threats. However, it is critical that we also provide the resources necessary to fully safeguard New York’s water infrastructure and protect the health and safety of our residents in the communities in which they live. I applaud today’s announcement and thank our partners in government for their good work.”

    New York State Police Superintendent Steven G. James said, “Cyber attacks and the need to continuously implement cyber security measures continues to increase across several entities. The new regulations and grant program are imperative for the evaluation of cyber security threats against our water infrastructure and provide the necessary resources to address them head-on. I thank Governor Hochul for her support and collaborative approach to identify, confront, and contain the cyber threats we face in New York State.”

    New York State Health Commissioner Dr. James McDonald said, “Protecting public health starts with ensuring the safety and reliability of the systems that deliver clean water to New Yorkers. These first-in-the-nation cybersecurity regulations, along with new funding to strengthen and modernize our infrastructure, reflect Governor Hochul’s commitment to preparing for evolving threats and ensuring our water systems can recover quickly and continue serving communities safely.”

    The new grant program and proposed regulations for the water and wastewater systems sector is the latest step taken by Governor Hochul to strengthen cyber defenses statewide and ensure the resiliency of New York’s critical infrastructure. Under Governor Hochul’s leadership, New York has led the nation in developing smart and effective cybersecurity policy — including establishing nation-leading financial sector regulations, signing landmark legislation to protect New York’s energy grid from cyber threats, strengthening cybersecurity across New York’s municipalities, implementing first-in-the-nation hospital cybersecurity minimum standards, and issuing the first-ever Statewide Cybersecurity Strategy.

    Senator Chuck Schumer said, “We must do all we can to protect our vital water infrastructure assets, like dams and drinking water, from cyber attack. That is why I’m pleased that new cybersecurity regulations for New York’s water and wastewater systems and a new grant program will help our communities meet federal standards and build a safer, more resilient New York. When it comes to fighting off cyberattacks, we must work arm-in-arm with state and local governments to prevent future hacks. I’m grateful for Governor Hochul’s partnership in identifying where we are vulnerable and ramping up our joint security efforts.”

    Senator Kirsten Gillibrand said, “Protecting our nation’s water systems against cyber attacks is a vital component of our national security, but the sector has long struggled to implement necessary cybersecurity protections. I am grateful that these new regulations and grants will drive necessary change in this sector and help defend our state from crippling attacks targeting essential services. I remain committed to ensuring New York is ready to defend itself against cyber threats and will continue to fight to deliver the resources our state needs to protect our critical infrastructure.”

    Assemblymember Steve Otis said, “Increasing cybersecurity protection for our critical infrastructure has been a major priority of Governor Hochul and the Legislature. Through the Governor’s release of the NYS Cybersecurity Strategy in 2023 and the passage of legislation and budgetary support, we are improving our defenses against the always evolving threats. The release of draft regulations for water and wastewater operators is the vital next step to protect the health, safety, and security of all New Yorkers. As a longtime supporter of New York’s nation-leading water infrastructure funding and as an advocate for robust cybersecurity protections, I am very appreciative of the Governor’s efforts here and the great work of New York’s environmental, health, and cybersecurity agencies.”

    These initiatives underline the Governor’s commitment to build a safer and more resilient New York, including online. Over the last three years, Governor Hochul has made foundational investments in New York’s cybersecurity by establishing the NYS Joint Security Operations Center (JSOC), standing up the statewide cybersecurity shared services program for counties and municipalities, and expanding the state’s law enforcement cyber capabilities by growing the Computer Crimes Unit, Cyber Analysis Unit, and Internet Crimes Against Children Center at the New York State Police.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Security: Indianapolis CPA Sentenced for Participation in Illegal Tax Shelter

    Source: United States Attorneys General 1

    Defendant Helped Clients in Mississippi and Elsewhere File Returns Claiming False Business Deductions

    An Indiana CPA was sentenced yesterday to three years in prison for assisting in the preparation of false tax returns on behalf of clients who participated in an illegal tax shelter.

    The following is according to court documents and statements made in court: between 2013 and 2022, Jason L. Crace prepared income tax returns for clients that claimed millions of dollars in false deductions for so-called “royalty payments.”  However, as Crace knew, these “royalty payments” were merely circular flows of money designed to give the appearance of genuine business expenses. Typically, a client would send money to bank accounts controlled by scheme promoters who then sent the money — minus a fee — back to a different bank account controlled by the client. In this way, tax shelter participants retained control of the money they transferred, while falsely deducting the transfers as business expenses on their tax returns. One of the scheme’s promoters, Stephen T. Mellinger III, previously pleaded guilty and was sentenced to eight years in prison for his role promoting the scheme.

    In total, Crace’s preparation of false tax returns claiming fraudulent “royalty” deductions caused a loss to the IRS of more than $2.5 million.

    In addition to his prison sentence, the court sentenced Crace to serve one year of supervised release and to pay restitution of $2,532,936.

    Acting Deputy Assistant Attorney General Karen E. Kelly of the Justice Department’s Tax Division and Acting U.S. Attorney Patrick Lemon for the Southern District of Mississippi made the announcement.

    IRS Criminal Investigation is investigating the case.

    Trial Attorneys Richard J. Hagerman, William M. Montague, and Matthew C. Hicks of the Justice Department’s Tax Division and Assistant U.S. Attorney Charles W. Kirkham for the Southern District of Mississippi are prosecuting the case.

    MIL Security OSI –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Vantage Drilling International Ltd. – Extension of Conditional Letter of Award

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Dubai, July 22, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Vantage Drilling International Ltd. (the “Company“) announces that the 90 day validity period of the Conditional Letter of Award received for the Platinum Explorer on 23 April 2025 has been extended by a further 30 days.  All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

    This information is considered to be inside information pursuant to the EU Market Abuse Regulation and is subject to disclosure requirements pursuant to section 5-12 of the Norwegian Securities Trading Act. The information was submitted for publication by Alaric Harrell, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company on the date and time as set out above.

    About the Company

    Vantage Drilling International Ltd., a Bermuda exempted company, is an offshore drilling contractor. Vantage Drilling’s primary business is to contract drilling units, related equipment and work crews primarily on a dayrate basis to drill oil and natural gas wells globally for major, national and independent oil and gas companies. Vantage Drilling also markets, operates and provides management services in respect of drilling units owned by others. For more information about the Company, please refer to the Company’s website, www.vantagedrilling.com

    Attachment

    • Extension of CLOA

    The MIL Network –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Security: CaaStle Founder Charged in $300 Million Fraud Scheme

    Source: US FBI

    United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Jay Clayton, and Assistant Director in Charge of the New York Field Office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”), Christopher G. Raia, announced today the unsealing of an Indictment charging CHRISTINE HUNSICKER with wire fraud, securities fraud, money laundering, making false statements to a financial institution, and aggravated identity theft.  The charges in the Indictment arise from an alleged scheme by the defendant to defraud investors in the fashion technology business CaaStle and a related venture out of more than $300 million through false statements, misleading claims, and fabricated documents.  HUNSICKER self-surrendered this morning and will be presented this afternoon before U.S. Magistrate Judge Jennifer E. Willis.  The case has been assigned to U.S. District Judge J. Paul Oetken. 

    “As alleged, Christine Hunsicker defrauded investors of hundreds of millions of dollars through document forgery, fabricated audits, and material misrepresentations about her company’s financial condition,” said U.S. Attorney Jay Clayton.  “The promise of pre-IPO technology companies can be fertile ground for fraudsters who play on investor euphoria.  Investors should be aware of these incentives and that pre-IPO companies are not subject to the rigors of SEC registration.  This Office is committed to protecting investors who place their trust and capital in emerging companies.  We will continue to work closely with our law enforcement partners to investigate, detect, and prosecute those individuals who abuse our markets and our investors”

     “Christine Hunsicker allegedly submitted fraudulent financial statements to swindle investors and banks of more than $300 million,” said FBI Assistant Director in Charge Christopher G. Raia.  “This alleged scheme was stitched together with repeated deception and misinformation, ultimately betraying the trust of the defendant’s clients.  The FBI remains committed to apprehending any business owners who implement unlawful practices to increase their personal wealth.”

    As alleged in the Indictment:[1]

    HUNSICKER, a well-known entrepreneur and successful businessperson in the fashion-tech industry, founded and was the chief executive officer of CaaStle, a clothing technology business.  While promoting CaaStle as a rapidly growing business valued at more than $1.4 billion, HUNSICKER knew that CaaStle was in financial distress with limited cash and significant expenses.  To raise the capital for CaaStle’s operations, HUNSICKER provided investors with falsified income statements, fake audited financial statements, fictitious bank records, and sham corporate documents that grossly overstated CaaStle’s operating profit, revenue, and available cash. She also misrepresented to investors that their funds would be used to purchase discounted shares from existing shareholders who needed liquidity, when in fact she fabricated the existence of those shareholders and used the money as new capital for CaaStle while concealing the company’s cash needs.  In total, HUNSICKER fraudulently induced more than $275 million in investments.

    When confronted by an audit firm in October 2023 about transmitting a fake audit to an investor, HUNSICKER lied, falsely claiming that she had created the fake audit in connection with a lecture she gave at Princeton University, and that sending the audit to the investor had been a one-time error. In reality, HUNSICKER had provided two fake audits to the investor while soliciting an investment. She later repaid that investor to prevent the public disclosure of her fraud. Undeterred, she continued the scheme, providing an investor with fake bank account screenshots showing nearly $200 million in available cash when CaaStle had less than $200,000. One month later, in October 2024, HUNSICKER provided a different investor with a fake draft audit. In 2024, HUNSICKER also falsified the signature of a Board director to make it appear that the Board had authorized the grant of stock options to another investor, raising more than $20 million for CaaStle. Around the same time, HUNSICKER extended her fraudulent activities to a new business venture, P180, using false information about CaaStle’s success to raise approximately $30 million for P180. HUNSICKER also submitted false information about CaaStle to a bank in order to obtain and keep a $20 million personal loan.

    Even after the CaaStle Board removed HUNSICKER as Chair and prohibited her from soliciting investments, she continued her fraudulent activities and attempted to raise new capital. In early 2025, she sold $8 million of her CaaStle shares and more than $5 million in P180 convertible notes without disclosing material information to investors. In February 2025, HUNSICKER attempted to sell an additional $19 million of her CaaStle shares to another investor. HUNSICKER persisted in her deceptive practices even after law enforcement agents seized her electronic devices in March 2025, continuing to meet with the investor about a fake audit without revealing its fraudulent nature, her removal from the Board, or the prohibition against her selling shares. CaaStle filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy on June 20, 2025.

    *               *                *

    HUNSICKER, 48, of Lafayette, New Jersey, is charged with one count of wire fraud, two counts of securities fraud, and one count of money laundering, each of which carries a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison.  HUNSICKER is also charged with one count of making false statements to a financial institution, which carries a maximum sentence of 30 years in prison, and aggravated identity theft, which carries a mandatory sentence of two years in prison.       

    The maximum potential sentences are prescribed by Congress and provided here for informational purposes only, as any sentencing of the defendant will be determined by the judge. 

    Mr. Clayton praised the outstanding work of the FBI. Mr. Clayton also expressed appreciation for the assistance of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, which separately initiated civil proceedings against the defendant today.

    The case is being handled by the Office’s Securities and Commodities Fraud Task Force.  Assistant U.S. Attorneys Marguerite Colson and Alexandra Rothman are in charge of the prosecution.


    [1] As the introductory phrase signifies, the entirety of the text of the Indictment and the descriptions of the Indictment set forth herein constitute only allegations, and every fact described should be treated as an allegation.

    MIL Security OSI –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: SBA Offers Disaster Relief to Indiana Small Businesses, Private Nonprofits and Residents Affected by Flooding

    Source: United States Small Business Administration

    ATLANTA–The U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) announced the availability of low interest federal disaster loans for Indiana small businesses, private nonprofits, and residents affected by the flooding occurring June 28-July 2, 2025. The SBA issued a disaster declaration in response to a request received from Gov. Mike Braun on July 11, 2025.

    The disaster declaration covers the counties of Daviess, Dubois, Greene, Knox, Martin and Pike which are eligible for both Physical Damage Loans and Economic Injury Disaster Loans (EIDLs) from the SBA.  

    Small businesses and private nonprofits are eligible to apply for business physical disaster loans and may borrow up to $2 million to repair or replace disaster-damaged or destroyed real estate, machinery and equipment, inventory, and other business assets.  

    Homeowners and renters are eligible to apply for home and personal property loans and may borrow up to $100,000 to replace or repair personal property, such as clothing, furniture, cars, and appliances. Homeowners may apply for up to $500,000 to replace or repair their primary residence.  

    Applicants may also be eligible for a loan increase of up to 20% of their physical damage, as verified by the SBA, for mitigation purposes. Eligible mitigation improvements include strengthening structures to protect against high wind damage, upgrading to wind rated garage doors, and installing a safe room or storm shelter to help protect property and occupants from future damage.  

    “One distinct advantage of SBA’s disaster loan program is the opportunity to fund upgrades reducing the risk of future storm damage,” said Chris Stallings, associate administrator of the Office of Disaster Recovery and Resilience at the SBA. “I encourage businesses and homeowners to work with contractors and mitigation professionals to improve their storm readiness while taking advantage of SBA’s mitigation loans.”

    SBA’s EIDL program is available to small businesses, small agricultural cooperatives and private nonprofit (PNP) organizations with financial losses directly related to the disaster. The SBA is unable to provide disaster loans to agricultural producers, farmers, or ranchers, except for small aquaculture enterprises.

    EIDLs are for working capital needs caused by the disaster and are available even if the business did not suffer any physical damage. They may be used to pay fixed debts, payroll, accounts payable, and other bills not paid due to the disaster.

    Interest rates are as low as 4% for small businesses, 3.625% for PNPs, and 2.813% for homeowners and renters, with terms up to 30 years. Interest does not begin to accrue, and payments are not due, until 12 months from the date of the first loan disbursement. The SBA sets loan amounts and terms, based on each applicant’s financial condition.

    Beginning, Wednesday, July 23, SBA customer service representatives will be on hand at the Disaster Loan Outreach Center in the county of Daviess to answer questions about SBA’s disaster loan program, explain the application process and help individuals complete their application. Walk-ins are accepted, but you can schedule an in-person appointment in advance at appointment.sba.gov.

    The DLOC hours of operation are listed below:

    Disaster Loan Outreach Center (DLOC)

    Daviess County

    Odon Community Center

    311 Park Street

    Odon, Indiana 47562

    Opening: Wednesday, July 23, 10 a.m. to 5 p.m.

    Hours:  Monday – Friday, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.

    Saturday, 10 a.m. to 2 p.m.

    Closed: Sunday

    Permanently Closing: July 31 at 4 p.m.

    Disaster survivors should not wait to settle with their insurance company before applying for a disaster loan. If a survivor does not know how much of their loss will be covered by insurance or other sources, SBA can make a low-interest disaster loan for the total loss up to its loan limits, provided the borrower agrees to use insurance proceeds to reduce or repay the loan.

    To apply online, visit sba.gov/disaster. Applicants may also call SBA’s Customer Service Center at (800) 659-2955 or email disastercustomerservice@sba.gov for more information on SBA disaster assistance. For people who are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access telecommunications relay services.

    The filing deadline to return applications for physical property damage is Sept. 16, 2025. The deadline to return economic injury applications is April 20, 2026.

    ###

    About the U.S. Small Business Administration

    The U.S. Small Business Administration helps power the American dream of business ownership. As the only go-to resource and voice for small businesses backed by the strength of the federal government, the SBA empowers entrepreneurs and small business owners with the resources and support they need to start, grow or expand their businesses, or recover from a declared disaster. It delivers services through an extensive network of SBA field offices and partnerships with public and private organizations. To learn more, visit www.sba.gov. 

    MIL OSI USA News –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Governor Stein Announces 515 New Jobs in Western NC as Manufacturer Selects Graham County

    Source: US State of North Carolina

    Headline: Governor Stein Announces 515 New Jobs in Western NC as Manufacturer Selects Graham County

    Governor Stein Announces 515 New Jobs in Western NC as Manufacturer Selects Graham County
    lsaito
    Tue, 07/22/2025 – 14:29

    Raleigh, NC

    Governor Josh Stein announced today that Eco King Solutions, LLC, a new subsidiary of a major manufacturer, plans to create 515 jobs in Graham County. The company will invest $80.5 million in Robbinsville to establish its first North American production facility to produce disposable, biodegradable paper tableware.

    “North Carolina offers global companies a perfect location for expansion into North America,” said Governor Josh Stein. “We welcome Eco King to western North Carolina, where it will find a welcoming business climate, education and workforce programs tailored to its needs, and the full range of competitive advantages that make North Carolina the top state to do business in the country.”

    Eco King Solutions is the wholly owned U.S. subsidiary of Chinese manufacturer Zhejiang Kingsun Eco-pack Co., Ltd, which was founded in 2008 and operates three high-capacity factories in China employing approximately 1,200 people. The company specializes in the production of disposable dishware such as bowls, plates, clamshell containers, and trays used in supermarkets and a wide variety of other food service industries. The company serves a growing customer base in North America, and the project represents a strategic expansion to better serve this market. Establishing the facility in Robbinsville will allow the company to localize production, improve supply chain efficiency, and reduce international shipping costs and production lead times. 

    “We have been impressed by how welcoming Robbinsville, Graham County and North Carolina have been to our company and this important project,” said Ping Zhang, Chairman of Eco King Solutions. “We worked very hard to find the right location for our business to thrive. We know we found it right here due to the excellent workforce, quality of life and friendly business climate. We are excited to be a part of the community, and we are excited for our company to prosper here.”

    “This investment is a success story for manufacturing in western North Carolina, where folks work hard to make great products,” said Commerce Secretary Lee Lilley. “Whether it’s CNBC naming us the top state for business or investments from CEOs around the world, North Carolina continues to be a global destination for great job creation.”

    Although wages will vary depending on the position, the average salary for the new jobs will be $46,707, in line with the average wage in Graham County of $46,628. The new jobs will generate an annual payroll impact in the community of more than $14 million.

    The company’s project in North Carolina will be facilitated, in part, by a Job Development Investment Grant (JDIG) approved by the state’s Economic Investment Committee earlier today. Over the course of the 12-year term of this grant, the project is estimated to grow the state’s economy by more than $743.4 million. Using a formula that takes into account the new tax revenues generated by 300 of the new jobs and the capital investment, the JDIG agreement authorizes the potential reimbursement to the company of up to $2,894,000, spread over 12 years. State payments occur only following performance verification by the departments of Commerce and Revenue that the company has met its incremental job creation and investment targets.

    The project’s projected return on investment of public dollars is 106 percent, meaning for every dollar of potential cost, the state receives $2.06 in state revenue. JDIG projects result in positive net tax revenue to the state treasury, even after taking into consideration the grant’s reimbursement payments to a given company. 

    “A major economic development win like today’s announcement provides proof that Robbinsville and Graham County are great places to do business,” said Senator Kevin Corbin. “We’re proud that Eco King chose us for their first North American factory, and we will do everything we can to help them be successful in western North Carolina.

    “I am very excited for Robbinsville,” said Representative Karl E. Gillespie. “The company will be establishing its first manufacturing facility in North America in Graham County. It’s another strong example of why North Carolina was recently named the #1 State in the nation to do business. This project is expected to bring new jobs, boost our local economy, and improve the quality of life in our community. Thank you to our local, regional, and state economic development leaders for helping make this project a reality.”

    Partnering with the North Carolina Department of Commerce and the Economic Development Partnership of North Carolina on this project were the North Carolina General Assembly, the North Carolina Community College System, the Commerce Department’s Divisions of Workforce Solutions and Rural Economic Development, Duke Energy, the Town of Robbinsville, Graham County, the Southwestern Commission, and the Mountain West Partnership. 

    Jul 22, 2025

    MIL OSI USA News –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Budd Joins Young, Colleagues to Urge End to Foreign Free-Riding Burdening American Patients & Calls for IP Negotiator Appointment

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Ted Budd (R-North Carolina)

    Washington, D.C. — U.S. Senator Ted Budd (R-N.C.) joined Senator Todd Young (R-Ind.), and several of his Senate Republicans colleagues, in sending a letter to U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer and Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick urging the Trump Administration to use ongoing trade negotiations to eliminate foreign price controls that leave American patients footing the cost for pharmaceutical research and development.

    “We welcome President Trump’s efforts to ensure foreign nations pay their fair share toward the cost of pharmaceutical research and development. For too long, some developed nations have benefited from American-financed innovation by implementing policies that suppress prices and limit spending on new medicines in their own markets,” wrote the senators. “These actions have contributed to American patients bearing a disproportionate share of global pharmaceutical innovation costs. U.S. trade negotiations offer a valuable mechanism to address these unfair practices, which not only burden Americans, but also function as non-tariff barriers to trade.”

    The letter also urges the Administration to designate a senior political official within the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative to lead trade discussions on pharmaceutical pricing in the near term, and to promptly nominate a qualified individual to fill the long-vacant Chief Innovation and Intellectual Property Negotiator role, who would ultimately assume leadership of this effort. Created by Congress in 2015, the position was intended to “address acts, policies, and practices of foreign governments that have a significant adverse impact on the value of United States innovation.”

    “Appointing an experienced Chief Innovation and Intellectual Property Negotiator would send a strong signal to our trading partners that the United States is committed to addressing imbalanced pharmaceutical pricing and ensuring that any commitments secured are effectively implemented and enforced over the long term,” the senators wrote.

    U.S. Senators Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), Tim Scott (R-S.C.), Roger Marshall (R-Kan.), Bill Cassidy (R-La.), Steve Daines (R-Mont.), Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.), Ashley Moody (R-Fla.), Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.), Roger Wicker (R-Miss.), John Boozman (R-Ark.), Jim Banks (R-Ind.), Jon Husted (R-Ohio), Cindy Hyde-Smith (R-Miss.), Tim Sheehy (R-Mont.), and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) also joined in signing the letter.

    Read the full letter text HERE and below:

    Dear Secretary Lutnick and Ambassador Greer,

    We welcome President Trump’s efforts to ensure foreign nations pay their fair share toward the cost of pharmaceutical research and development. For too long, some developed nations have benefited from American-financed innovation by implementing policies that suppress prices and limit spending on new medicines in their own markets. These actions have contributed to American patients bearing a disproportionate share of global pharmaceutical innovation costs. U.S. trade negotiations offer a valuable mechanism to address these unfair practices, which not only burden Americans, but also function as non-tariff barriers to trade.

    Executive Order 14297, issued on May 12, directed the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) and the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) to pursue the removal of policies and practices abroad that have “the effect of forcing American patients to pay for a disproportionate amount of global pharmaceutical research and development, including by suppressing the price of pharmaceutical products below fair market value in foreign countries.” Consistent with this directive, it is important that Commerce and USTR engage with U.S. trading partners to negotiate binding commitments to remove these market-distorting price controls.

    Currently, dozens of countries—including those with longstanding pricing policies affecting U.S. pharmaceutical products—have expressed interest or are currently undergoing tariff negotiations. Now is the time for Commerce and USTR to clarify top priorities, capitalize on opportunities, and resolve unfair foreign government policies in support of American workers and patients.

    Given the complexity of the issues and their importance to the American public, we urge the Administration to immediately designate a senior political official at USTR to lead the effort to secure and enforce pharmaceutical pricing commitments through trade negotiations and also to promptly nominate a qualified individual to fill the vacant position of Chief Innovation and Intellectual Property Negotiator. Congress created this important position in 2015 to “address acts, policies, and practices of foreign governments that have a significant adverse impact on the value of United States innovation.” Once filled, we recommend this role—supported by a team within USTR—be charged with leading this effort.

    Appointing an experienced Chief Innovation and Intellectual Property Negotiator would send a strong signal to our trading partners that the United States is committed to addressing imbalanced pharmaceutical pricing and ensuring that any commitments secured are effectively implemented and enforced over the long term.

    We look forward to working with you as you confront these longstanding and unfair price controls that leave Americans disproportionately funding global health care innovation. Eliminating these egregious practices could increase investment in medical research and development by billions of dollars and lower overall health care costs for Americans. In addition, encouraging foreign governments to appropriately value medicines developed and produced in the United States would significantly bolster U.S. exports and jobs. We appreciate your continued attention to this issue and stand ready to support efforts that promote fair and sustainable trade outcomes.

    Sincerely,

    /X/

    MIL OSI USA News –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Budd Joins Young, Colleagues to Urge End to Foreign Free-Riding Burdening American Patients & Calls for IP Negotiator Appointment

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Ted Budd (R-North Carolina)

    Washington, D.C. — U.S. Senator Ted Budd (R-N.C.) joined Senator Todd Young (R-Ind.), and several of his Senate Republicans colleagues, in sending a letter to U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer and Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick urging the Trump Administration to use ongoing trade negotiations to eliminate foreign price controls that leave American patients footing the cost for pharmaceutical research and development.

    “We welcome President Trump’s efforts to ensure foreign nations pay their fair share toward the cost of pharmaceutical research and development. For too long, some developed nations have benefited from American-financed innovation by implementing policies that suppress prices and limit spending on new medicines in their own markets,” wrote the senators. “These actions have contributed to American patients bearing a disproportionate share of global pharmaceutical innovation costs. U.S. trade negotiations offer a valuable mechanism to address these unfair practices, which not only burden Americans, but also function as non-tariff barriers to trade.”

    The letter also urges the Administration to designate a senior political official within the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative to lead trade discussions on pharmaceutical pricing in the near term, and to promptly nominate a qualified individual to fill the long-vacant Chief Innovation and Intellectual Property Negotiator role, who would ultimately assume leadership of this effort. Created by Congress in 2015, the position was intended to “address acts, policies, and practices of foreign governments that have a significant adverse impact on the value of United States innovation.”

    “Appointing an experienced Chief Innovation and Intellectual Property Negotiator would send a strong signal to our trading partners that the United States is committed to addressing imbalanced pharmaceutical pricing and ensuring that any commitments secured are effectively implemented and enforced over the long term,” the senators wrote.

    U.S. Senators Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), Tim Scott (R-S.C.), Roger Marshall (R-Kan.), Bill Cassidy (R-La.), Steve Daines (R-Mont.), Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.), Ashley Moody (R-Fla.), Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.), Roger Wicker (R-Miss.), John Boozman (R-Ark.), Jim Banks (R-Ind.), Jon Husted (R-Ohio), Cindy Hyde-Smith (R-Miss.), Tim Sheehy (R-Mont.), and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) also joined in signing the letter.

    Read the full letter text HERE and below:

    Dear Secretary Lutnick and Ambassador Greer,

    We welcome President Trump’s efforts to ensure foreign nations pay their fair share toward the cost of pharmaceutical research and development. For too long, some developed nations have benefited from American-financed innovation by implementing policies that suppress prices and limit spending on new medicines in their own markets. These actions have contributed to American patients bearing a disproportionate share of global pharmaceutical innovation costs. U.S. trade negotiations offer a valuable mechanism to address these unfair practices, which not only burden Americans, but also function as non-tariff barriers to trade.

    Executive Order 14297, issued on May 12, directed the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) and the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) to pursue the removal of policies and practices abroad that have “the effect of forcing American patients to pay for a disproportionate amount of global pharmaceutical research and development, including by suppressing the price of pharmaceutical products below fair market value in foreign countries.” Consistent with this directive, it is important that Commerce and USTR engage with U.S. trading partners to negotiate binding commitments to remove these market-distorting price controls.

    Currently, dozens of countries—including those with longstanding pricing policies affecting U.S. pharmaceutical products—have expressed interest or are currently undergoing tariff negotiations. Now is the time for Commerce and USTR to clarify top priorities, capitalize on opportunities, and resolve unfair foreign government policies in support of American workers and patients.

    Given the complexity of the issues and their importance to the American public, we urge the Administration to immediately designate a senior political official at USTR to lead the effort to secure and enforce pharmaceutical pricing commitments through trade negotiations and also to promptly nominate a qualified individual to fill the vacant position of Chief Innovation and Intellectual Property Negotiator. Congress created this important position in 2015 to “address acts, policies, and practices of foreign governments that have a significant adverse impact on the value of United States innovation.” Once filled, we recommend this role—supported by a team within USTR—be charged with leading this effort.

    Appointing an experienced Chief Innovation and Intellectual Property Negotiator would send a strong signal to our trading partners that the United States is committed to addressing imbalanced pharmaceutical pricing and ensuring that any commitments secured are effectively implemented and enforced over the long term.

    We look forward to working with you as you confront these longstanding and unfair price controls that leave Americans disproportionately funding global health care innovation. Eliminating these egregious practices could increase investment in medical research and development by billions of dollars and lower overall health care costs for Americans. In addition, encouraging foreign governments to appropriately value medicines developed and produced in the United States would significantly bolster U.S. exports and jobs. We appreciate your continued attention to this issue and stand ready to support efforts that promote fair and sustainable trade outcomes.

    Sincerely,

    /X/

    MIL OSI USA News –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Rep. Huffman Introduces Bill to Protect Small Farmers and Producers

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Jared Huffman Representing the 2nd District of California

    July 22, 2025

    Washington, D.C. – Today, Representative Jared Huffman (CA-02) re-introduced legislation that would enshrine the right for small cannabis producers to ship and sell their products directly to consumers. This bill, the Small and Homestead Independent Producers (SHIP) Act, would enable small farmers and producers to operate their businesses within and across state lines. The legislation is specifically targeted to support the smallest family farmers and help them sustain their businesses under a larger federal legalization law.

    “Larger, commercialized cannabis operators are infiltrating the market and squeezing out our local farmers in the process,” said Rep. Jared Huffman. “So when the antiquated federal prohibition on cannabis finally gets repealed, we need to have substantial legislation ready to help these small businesses survive. My legislation would ensure that folks can ship their products straight to consumers, which would both help expand small businesses and ensure farmers stay afloat. When full legalization is guaranteed, we must commit to not leaving our smallest family-farmers behind.”

    “Nearly 15 years into the experiment of state-level cannabis legalization, the cracks in the system are clear: small and craft producers are being pushed to the margins, safe access for consumers and patients is shrinking, and the industry is consolidating into the hands of a few,” said Ross Gordon, Co-Founder at National Craft Cannabis Coalition and Policy Analyst at Origins Council. “Without direct-to-consumer shipping, federal cannabis legalization risks reinforcing these failures instead of correcting them. The SHIP Act is a make-or-break policy for the future of small cannabis businesses in California and across the country.”

     “Our state’s DTC framework helps support nearly 1,700 cultivators in a state of 1.2 million people,” said Mark Barnett, Co-Founder at National Craft Cannabis Coalition and Policy Director at Maine Craft Cannabis Association. “Without these opportunities, quality in the legal market will suffer, and consumers will look elsewhere. The SHIP Act would guarantee that small farmers have a pathway to participate in one of the country’s most promising new economic frontiers.”

    “The regulation of cannabis has, unfortunately, not equated to adequate access,” said Frederika McClary Easley, President of the Minority Cannabis Business Association (MCBA). “Many patients and consumers navigate plant deserts that have been created due to municipal opt-outs and zoning restrictions. The SHIP Act will help to address this while prioritizing access for small craft producers, which in turn positively impacts their success and sustainability. MCBA is proud to support this piece of federal legislation that recognizes the importance of craft growing and small businesses as the bedrock of this burgeoning industry.”

    This bill is co-sponsored by Representative Val Hoyle.

    It is endorsed by National Craft Cannabis Coalition, Minority Cannabis Business Association, National Cannabis Industry Association, Drug Policy Alliance, Parabola Center, Marijuana Justice, Veterans Cannabis Coalition, Origins Council, Washington Sun & Craft Growers Association, Vermont Growers Association, Maine Craft Cannabis Association, Humboldt County Growers Alliance, Mendocino Cannabis Alliance, Trinity County Agricultural Alliance, and the Central California Cannabis Club.

    Full text of this legislation can be found here.

    ###



    Previous Article

    MIL OSI USA News –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: CAMERON COUNTY – Pennsylvania Department of Aging to Announce $3 Million Investment to Help Renovate, Upgrade Senior Community Centers Across the Commonwealth

    Source: US State of Pennsylvania

    July 23, 2025 – Emporium, PA

    ADVISORY – CAMERON COUNTY – Pennsylvania Department of Aging to Announce $3 Million Investment to Help Renovate, Upgrade Senior Community Centers Across the Commonwealth

    Pennsylvania Department of Aging Secretary Jason Kavulich will join regional leaders to highlight the success of the Senior Community Center (SCC) grant program that provides $3 million in competitive and non-competitive grants. This investment will help SCCs across the Commonwealth fund larger scale projects and smaller needs, ensuring older Pennsylvanians have a safe, community-centered place to gather.

    The Department recently partnered with the National Center to Reframe Aging to explore ways to promote and strengthen Pennsylvania’s 400+ Senior Community Centers as vibrant, in-person community hubs that connects older adults to vital resources, services and broader community life.

    This partnership is a key tactic in Aging Our Way, PA – Pennsylvania’s 10-year multisector plan on aging that was designed to meet the needs and preferences of older adults across the Commonwealth. The Department received funding from Governor Josh Shapiro’s 2024-25 budget to invest in the development of the PA CareKit, another key tactic of the plan.

    In his 2025-26 budget proposal, Governor Shapiro invests more in older Pennsylvanians by including $3 million for year two implementation of the plan. The Department will focus on modernizing and strengthening the PA Link, which serves as Pennsylvania’s Aging and Disability Resource Center network, designed to streamline access to long-term services and supports. Governor Shapiro’s budget proposal also includes $2 millionso the Department canincrease accountability and oversight of the Area Agency on Aging (AAA) network which, among other things, provides resources and protective services for older adults, and a $20 million investment for those AAAs so they can continue to provide key services to older adults.

    WHO:
    Secretary of Aging Jason Kavulich
    Cameron County Commissioners Jessica Herzing, James Moate and Joshua Zucal
    Kim Briggs, Executive Director, Cameron/Elk/McKean Area Agency on Aging
    Don Perry, Board President, Emporium Senior Center

    WHEN:
    Wednesday, July 23, 2025, 11:00 AM

    WHERE:
    Emporium Senior Center
    105 E. 4th St.
    Emporium, PA 15834

    MEDIA RSVP:
    Media interested in attending must RSVP with the name of photographer/reporter to agingcomms@pa.gov.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: MIFFLIN COUNTY – Governor Shapiro to Visit Lewistown Small Businesses, Highlight Proposed Budget Investments in PA Main Streets

    Source: US State of Pennsylvania

    July 23, 2025 – Lewistown, PA

    ADVISORY – MIFFLIN COUNTY – Governor Shapiro to Visit Lewistown Small Businesses, Highlight Proposed Budget Investments in PA Main Streets

    Governor Josh Shapiro will join DCED Secretary Rick Siger, local community leaders, and business owners to visit small businesses in Lewistown. This visit follows the Governor’s Main Street Matters stops in Chinatown and Lancaster this year, highlighting the real economic opportunities his 2025-26 budget will create for Pennsylvanians across the Commonwealth.

    Main Street Matters has built upon and modernized the Keystone Communities program and serves as a critical element of the Governor’s Economic Development Strategy. The Governor proposed an additional $20 million for the Main Street Matters program in his budget after its success in 2024, supporting small businesses and commercial corridors as the backbone of communities across the Commonwealth.

    WHO:
    Governor Josh Shapiro
    Secretary of Community and Economic Development Rick Siger
    Commissioner Kevin Kodish, Mifflin County Commissioners
    Julie Fitzpatrick, Executive Director, PA Downtown Center
    Ryan Cherry, Owner, East End Coffee Co.

    WHEN:
    Wednesday, July 23, 2025 at 11:00 AM

    WHERE:
    East End Coffee Co.
    18 E Market St
    Lewistown, PA 17044

    LIVE STREAM:
    pacast.com/live/gov
    governor.pa.gov/live/

    RSVP:
    Press who are interested in attending must RSVP with the names and phone numbers for each member of their team to ra-gvgovpress@pa.gov.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Dreamland Limited Announces Pricing of Initial Public Offering

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    HONG KONG, July 22, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Dreamland Limited (the “Company” or “Dreamland”), a Hong Kong-based event management service provider, today announced the pricing of its initial public offering (the “Offering”) of 2,000,000 Class A ordinary shares, 1,340,000 of which are being offered by the Company and 660,000 by an existing shareholder (the “Selling Shareholder”), at a public offering price of US$4.00 per Class A ordinary share. The Company is also filing a resale prospectus concurrent with the Offering for the resale of 5,416,740 Class A ordinary shares held by Prime Crest Holdings Limited, Fuji Holdings Limited, Yield Rights Group Limited and Allied Target Limited (the “Resale Shareholders”). The Class A ordinary shares have been approved for listing on the Nasdaq Capital Market and are expected to commence trading on July 23, 2025 under the ticker symbol “TDIC.”

    The Company expects to receive aggregate gross proceeds of US$8,000,000 from the Offering, before deducting underwriting discounts and other related expenses. The Company will not receive any proceeds from the sale of Class A ordinary shares offered by the Selling Shareholder or Resale Shareholders in the Offering. The Offering is expected to close on or about July 24, 2025, subject to the satisfaction of customary closing conditions.

    Net proceeds from the Offering due to the Company will be used for: (i) acquiring multi-territorial IP licenses; (ii) setting up the Company’s own ticketing platform; (iii) possible strategic acquisitions; (iv) expanding the Company’s marketing department and financing and administration department; (v) upgrading the Company’s enterprise resource planning system; (vi) repaying loans made by a director in connection with the payment of costs and expenses in connection with the Offering and obtaining a listing of the Company’s Class A ordinary shares on the Nasdaq Capital Market; and (vii) working capital and other corporate purposes.

    The Offering is being conducted on a firm commitment basis. Bancroft Capital, LLC is acting as the lead managing underwriter for the Offering (the “Underwriters”). Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP is acting as U.S. counsel to the Underwriters, led by W. David Mannheim, Kathryn Simons and Ashley Wu, in connection with the Offering.

    A registration statement on Form F-1 relating to the Offering was filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) (File No.: 333-286471), as amended, and was declared effective by the SEC on June 30, 2025. The Offering is being made only by means of a prospectus, forming a part of the registration statement. Copies of the final prospectus relating to the Offering, when available, may be obtained from Bancroft Capital, LLC by email at investmentbanking@bancroft4vets.com, by standard mail to 501 Office Center Drive, Suite 130, Fort Washington, PA 19034, or by telephone at +1 (484) 546-8000. In addition, copies of the final prospectus relating to the Offering, when available, may be obtained via the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

    Before you invest, you should read the prospectus and other documents the Company has filed or will file with the SEC for more information about the Company and the Offering. This press release does not constitute an offer to sell, or the solicitation of an offer to buy any of the Company’s securities, nor shall such securities be offered or sold in the United States absent registration or an applicable exemption from registration, nor shall there be any offer, solicitation or sale of any of the Company’s securities in any state or jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of such state or jurisdiction.

    About Dreamland Limited

    Dreamland Limited is a Hong Kong-based event management service provider. The Company specializes in organizing, planning, promoting and managing themed touring walk-through experience events for intellectual property owners of characters in well-publicized animated cartoons and/or live action theatrical motion pictures. For more information, please visit the Company’s website: http://www.trendicint.com.

    Forward-Looking Statements

    Certain statements in this announcement are forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to, the Company’s proposed Offering. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties and are based on the Company’s current expectations and projections about future events that the Company believes may affect its financial condition, results of operations, business strategy and financial needs, including the expectation that the proposed Offering will be successfully completed. Investors can find many (but not all) of these statements by the use of words such as “believe”, “plan”, “expect”, “intend”, “should”, “seek”, “estimate”, “will”, “aim” and “anticipate” or other similar expressions in the prospectus. The Company undertakes no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent occurring events or circumstances, or changes in its expectations, except as may be required by law. Although the Company believes that the expectations expressed in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, it cannot assure you that such expectations will turn out to be correct, and the Company cautions investors that actual results may differ materially from the anticipated results and encourages investors to review other factors that may affect its future results in the Company’s registration statement and other filings with the SEC.

    For more information, please contact:

    Dreamland Limited
    Ms. Seto Wai Yue
    Email: frances.seto@trendicint.com

    The MIL Network –

    July 23, 2025
←Previous Page
1 … 72 73 74 75 76 … 2,041
Next Page→
NewzIntel.com

NewzIntel.com

MIL Open Source Intelligence

  • Blog
  • About
  • FAQs
  • Authors
  • Events
  • Shop
  • Patterns
  • Themes

Twenty Twenty-Five

Designed with WordPress