NewzIntel.com

Category: Business

  • MIL-OSI Canada: Alberta Next: Albertans to choose path forward

    Source: Government of Canada regional news (2)

    MIL OSI Canada News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: NASA Kennedy Breathes Life into Moon Soil Testing

    Source: NASA

    As NASA works to establish a long-term presence on the Moon, researchers have reached a breakthrough by extracting oxygen at a commercial scale from simulated lunar soil at Swamp Works at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida. The achievement moves NASA one step closer to its goal of utilizing resources on the Moon and beyond instead of relying only on supplies shipped from Earth.
    NASA Kennedy researchers in the Exploration Research and Technology programs teamed up with Lunar Resources Inc. (LUNAR), a space industrial company in Houston, Texas, to perform molten regolith electrolysis. Researchers used the company’s resource extraction reactor, called LR-1, along with NASA Kennedy’s vacuum chamber. During the recent vacuum chamber testing, molecular oxygen was measured in its pure form along with the production of metals from a batch of dust and rock that simulates lunar soil, often referred to as “regolith,” in the industry.
    “This is the first time NASA has produced molecular oxygen using this process,” said Dr. Annie Meier, molten regolith electrolysis project manager at NASA Kennedy. “The process of heating up the reactor is like using an elaborate cooking pot. Once the lid is on, we are essentially watching the gas products come out.”
    During testing, the vacuum environment chamber replicated the vacuum pressure of the lunar surface. The extraction reactor heated about 55 pounds (25 kilograms) of simulated regolith up to a temperature of 3100°F (1700°C) until it melted. Researchers then passed an electric current through the molten regolith until oxygen in a gas form was separated from the metals of the soil. They measured and collected the molecular oxygen for further study.
    In addition to air for breathing, astronauts could use oxygen from the Moon as a propellant for NASA’s lunar landers and for building essential infrastructure. This practice of in-situ resource utilization (ISRU) also decreases the costs of deep space exploration by reducing the number of resupply missions needed from Earth.
    Once the process is perfected on Earth, the reactor and its subsystems can be delivered on future missions to the Moon. Lunar rovers, similar to NASA’s ISRU Pilot Excavator, could autonomously gather the regolith to bring back to the reactor system to separate the metals and oxygen.
    “Using this unique chemical process can produce the oxidizer, which is half of the propellant mix, and it can create vital metals used in the production of solar panels that in turn could power entire lunar base stations,” said Evan Bell, mechanical structures and mechatronics lead at NASA Kennedy.
    Post-test data analysis will help the NASA and LUNAR teams better understand the thermal and chemical function of full-scale molten regolith electrolysis reactors for the lunar surface. The vacuum chamber and reactor also can be upgraded to represent other locations of the lunar environment as well as conditions on Mars for further testing.
    Researchers at NASA Kennedy began developing and testing molten regolith electrolysis reactors in the early 1990s. Swamp Works is a hands-on learning environment facility at NASA Kennedy that takes ideas through development and into application to benefit space exploration and everyone living on Earth. From 2019 to 2023, Swamp Works developed an early concept reactor under vacuum conditions named Gaseous Lunar Oxygen from Regolith Electrolysis (GaLORE). Scientists at NASA’s Johnson Space Center in Houston conducted similar testing in 2023, removing carbon monoxide from simulated lunar regolith in a vacuum chamber.
    “We always say that Kennedy Space Center is Earth’s premier spaceport, and this breakthrough in molten regolith electrolysis is just another aspect of us being the pioneers in providing spaceport capabilities on the Moon, Mars, and beyond,” Bell said.
    NASA’s Exploration Research and Technology programs, related laboratories, and research facilities develop technologies that will enable human deep space exploration. NASA’s Game Changing Development program, managed by the agency’s Space Technology Mission Directorate funded the project.

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: 3 Weeks Left To Apply for FEMA Assistance Following February Severe Storms and Flooding

    Source: US Federal Emergency Management Agency

    Headline: 3 Weeks Left To Apply for FEMA Assistance Following February Severe Storms and Flooding

    3 Weeks Left To Apply for FEMA Assistance Following February Severe Storms and Flooding

    FRANKFORT, Ky

    –Homeowners and renters in Breathitt, Clay, Estill, Floyd, Harlan, Johnson, Knott, Lee, Leslie, Letcher, Martin, Owsley, Perry, Pike, Simpson and Woodford counties who experienced damage or losses caused by the February severe storms and floods have three weeks to apply for federal disaster assistance

    The deadline to apply for federal assistance is May 25

     How To Apply for FEMA AssistanceThere are several ways to apply for FEMA assistance:Online at DisasterAssistance

    gov

    Visit any Disaster Recovery Center

    To find a center close to you, visit fema

    gov/DRC, or text DRC along with your Zip Code to 43362 (Example: “DRC 29169”)

    Use the FEMA mobile app

    Call the FEMA Helpline at 800-621-3362

    It is open 7 a

    m

    to 10 p

    m

    Eastern Time

    Help is available in many languages

    If you use a relay service, such as Video Relay Service (VRS), captioned telephone or other service, give FEMA your number for that service

    FEMA works with every household on a case-by-case basis

    FEMA representatives can explain available assistance programs, how to apply to FEMA, and help connect survivors with resources for their recovery needs

    When you apply, you will need to provide:A current phone number where you can be contacted

    Your address at the time of the disaster and the address where you are now staying

    Your Social Security Number

    A general list of damage and losses

    Banking information if you choose direct deposit

    If insured, the policy number or the agent and/or the company name

    Survivors should keep their contact information updated with FEMA as the agency may need to call to schedule a home inspection or get additional information

     Disaster assistance is not a substitute for insurance and is not intended to compensate for all losses caused by a disaster

    The assistance is intended to meet basic needs and supplement disaster recovery efforts

     Homeowners and renters in Woodford County may be eligible for federal assistance under DR-4860-KY or/and DR-4864-KY

    If you had property damage or loss in Woodford County from the February severe incident, and then again from the April severe incident, you will need to complete two separate disaster assistance applications

    For an accessible video on how to apply for FEMA assistance, go to youtube

    com/watch?v=WZGpWI2RCNw

     For more information about Kentucky flooding recovery, visit www

    fema

    gov/disaster/4860

    Follow the FEMA Region 4 X account at x

    com/femaregion4

     
    martyce

    allenjr
    Mon, 05/05/2025 – 15:08

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Mayor Johnston, Governor Polis, Attorney General Weiser, Senator Bennet, Congressman Neguse & Congresswoman Pettersen Release Letter to Colorado General Assembly on A.I.

    Source: US State of Colorado

    DENVER – Today, Mayor Johnston, Governor Polis, Attorney General Weiser, Senator Bennet, Congressman Neguse and Congresswoman Pettersen released the following letter to the Colorado General Assembly on A.I. 

    “For decades, Colorado has served as a national leader in the technology innovation sector. Our state is proud to be home to cutting-edge companies and national laboratories that drive our economy and jobs, while also championing groundbreaking consumer protection laws like the Colorado Consumer Protection Act. 

    Over the past year, stakeholders and legislators together have worked to find the right path forward on Colorado’s first-in-the-nation artificial intelligence regulatory law created by SB24-205. This bill established a regulatory framework that seeks to lower the risk of algorithmic discrimination in AI-based decision-making technology. 

    The stakeholder collaboration that took place over many months leading up to and during the 2025 legislative session brought many ideas, concerns, and priorities to the table from a wide range of communities. However, with just hours remaining in the 2025 legislative session, it is clear that more time is needed to continue important stakeholder work to ensure that Colorado’s artificial intelligence regulatory law is effective and implementable. 

    Together, we implore leadership and members of the Colorado General Assembly to take action now to delay implementation of SB 24-205 until January 2027. Colorado communities in every corner of our state deserve the benefit of well-crafted artificial intelligence consumer protection law that more time for stakeholder engagement and policy development work will bring. 

    This pause will allow consumer advocates, Colorado’s business community, and other states to collaborate on a balanced, future-ready framework – one that protects privacy and fairness without stifling innovation or driving business away from our state.” 

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – US tariffs on European wine – P-001121/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The European Union is acting to protect its businesses and consumers. That is why the European Union has always been open to negotiate with the United States.

    The now-suspended countermeasures are strong but proportionate, taking also into account the input received during the stakeholder consultation and the overall European Union-United States trade relation.

    The European Union will not hesitate to defend the legitimate interests and rights of its companies and citizens.

    In the event of additional tariffs by the United States on European wines, the Commission will spare no effort to avert unnecessary damage to the European wine sector.

    The European Union has at its disposal several instruments for that purpose, including exceptional measures to address market disturbances that can be put quickly in place .

    If swiftly adopted, the wine package includes several provisions that could help the sector better cope with challenges, such as the prevailing decrease in consumption and global market developments.

    These measures offer greater flexibility in managing policy instruments, enhance competitiveness, strengthen the sector’s ability to adapt to shifting trends in demand, facilitate the internal market functioning and provide longer support to consolidate external markets.

    Last updated: 5 May 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Privatisation of preventive screening – E-001681/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001681/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Emmanouil Fragkos (ECR)

    The Greek government is privatising preventive newborn screening by 2029, aiming to adopt a genetic analysis method through human genome sequencing instead of traditional biochemical testing. The process will be entrusted to RealGenix and Beginnings, with the research results belonging to these companies, which raises serious ethical and technical issues, as genetic analysis is still at the pilot stage worldwide.

    The ‘programmatic agreement’ between the Ministry of Health and the two companies provides for the conduct of genetic testing for 100,000 newborns by 2029, without prior scientific evaluation or opinion from competent institutions. This process raises concerns about the management of personal data, as well as the possible exploitation of citizens’ genetic material by private companies, with a potential benefit for multinational pharmaceutical and insurance companies. In the absence of transparency and safeguards in a programmatic agreement between the public sector and companies for the genomic analysis of 100,000 newborns, despite the official assurance of compliance with the GDPR, the genetic material becomes the property of the company without clear guarantees for its non-commercial exploitation.

    In view of this:

    • 1.Are the strict confidentiality clause, the lack of public access to the agreement and the opacity of funding compatible with the objective of protecting the personal data of future Greek children?
    • 2.Has the Commission examined whether the ‘programmatic agreement’ meets European standards for the protection of the GDPR?

    Submitted: 26.4.2025

    Last updated: 5 May 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: California applies to expand essential health benefits to include IVF, hearing exams

    Source: US State of California 2

    May 5, 2025

    What you need to know: California applied to the federal government today to update the state’s benchmark plan, which would expand coverage requirements for essential health benefits (EHBs) like hearing aids and wheelchairs in the individual and small group markets starting in 2027.

    Sacramento, California – Today, Governor Gavin Newsom, through the Department of Managed Health Care (DMHC), submitted an application to the federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to update California’s benchmark plan. The new benchmark plan would expand coverage requirements for essential health benefits (EHBs) in the individual and small group markets starting in 2027, following CMS approval. That expanded coverage would include services to such fertility treatments, annual hearing exams and hearing aids, and mobility devices such as walkers, manual and power wheelchairs, and scooters.

    “Quality health care should be available for all Californians, and one way we are working to achieve this goal is by updating the state’s benchmark plan for required health benefits. My administration has been working over the last year, in collaboration with the state Legislature, to expand coverage for important and needed health care services, including fertility services, hearing aids and wheelchairs. These new coverage requirements will have life-changing impacts for millions of Californians.”

    Governor Gavin Newsom

    Support from California’s leaders 

    Senator Caroline Menjivar (D-San Fernando Valley), MSW, Chair of the Senate Health Committee: “Moving towards expanding California’s Essential Health Benefits marks a huge step forward for people with hearing loss, disabilities, and those struggling with infertility. The new proposed benchmark plan means children who are hard of hearing or deaf will have coverage for the hearing aids that make a significant difference in their development and well-being. Folks who are currently cut off from family-building because of financial barriers will be able to make this important reproductive decision for themselves. And those whose mobility relies on access to durable medical equipment will have increased coverage for their means of independence. This additional coverage would be life-altering and I am thankful to the Administration, experts, and community stakeholders who came together to craft a benchmark plan that serves Californians.”

    Assemblymember Mia Bonta (D-Oakland), Chair of the Assembly Health Committee: “Expanding coverage to in vitro fertilization, annual hearing exams, hearing aids, and durable medical equipment in our state’s benchmark plan shows our statewide commitment to prioritizing meaningful access to care. I was proud to invest the time needed in a thorough, collaborative, and thoughtful process that is yielding real results for our constituents, who see the future of their coverage as more uncertain than ever. For the young couple who will finally be able to start their family, a child who will be able to hear their teacher, and someone with mobility limitations looking to remain independent, these changes will have impacts they feel every day. I’m thankful to everyone who made this possible.”

    California Health & Human Services Agency Secretary Kim Johnson: “The updates to California’s benchmark plan and essential health benefits will close coverage gaps for millions while enhancing access to fertility services, hearing aids, and wheelchairs, easing the burden on families seeking these vital health care services.”

    DMHC Director Mary Watanabe: “Selecting a new benchmark plan sets a new standard for commercial health coverage in California. I want to extend my sincerest gratitude to the state Legislature, health plans, providers, advocates and members of the public who participated in the process and provided thoughtful feedback and comments. This input has been essential, and was carefully considered, as we examined new opportunities to improve and expand health care coverage requirements under a new benchmark plan.”

    How we got here

    The federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) requires health plans in the individual and small group markets to offer a comprehensive package of services, known as EHBs. EHBs must cover 10 broad categories of services including primary care, hospital services, prescription drugs, and emergency and urgent care services. Within these broad categories, a state can decide what specific services plans must cover by selecting its benchmark plan, which sets forth the EHB coverage requirements.

    The DMHC has been working over the last year with the Newsom administration and Legislature to update California’s benchmark plan, including holding public meetings to share information on expanding the EHBs and the process to update the state’s benchmark plan. These public meetings provided opportunities for the public to comment about the benefits that should be considered for inclusion in the new benchmark plan. In addition to the public meetings, the DMHC issued public notices on California’s work to update the benchmark plan and accepted public comments on the state’s draft benchmark plan summary. If approved by CMS, the new benchmark plan requirements would take effect January 1, 2027.

    Health care, Press Releases

    Recent news

    May 5, 2025

    News What you need to know: California remains the #1 state for tourism, with record-high tourism spending reaching $157.3 billion in 2024. However, the Trump administration’s policies and rhetoric are driving away tourists, killing tourism and hospitality jobs, and…

    May 2, 2025

    News SACRAMENTO — Governor Gavin Newsom issued the following statement today after the University of California Board of Regents named James Milliken the new president of the University of California: “California’s future depends on the strength of our institutions,…

    May 2, 2025

    News What you need to know: As part of the California Jobs First initiative, the state is awarding $30.5 million in tax credits to seven companies committed to creating new jobs and investing over $2.1 billion across key industries like clean energy, advanced…

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Ahead of projected “Trump Slump,” Governor Newsom announces record-high tourism — again

    Source: US State of California 2

    May 5, 2025

    What you need to know: California remains the #1 state for tourism, with record-high tourism spending reaching $157.3 billion in 2024. However, the Trump administration’s policies and rhetoric are driving away tourists, killing tourism and hospitality jobs, and already leading to decreased tourism projections.

    SACRAMENTO — Governor Newsom and Visit California today announced that California’s tourism spending continued to grow in 2024, reaching a record-high of $157.3 billion in tourism spending throughout the state — an increase of 3% from 2023, another record-spending year.  This comes after recent news that California’s economy is now the fourth-largest economy in the world and experienced a population increase for the second year in a row.

    “California dominates as a premier destination for travelers throughout the nation, and around the globe. With diverse landscapes, top-rate attractions, and welcoming communities, California welcomes millions of visitors every year. We also recognize that our state’s progress is threatened by the economic impacts of this federal administration, and are committed to working to protect jobs and ensure all Californians benefit from a thriving tourism industry.”

    Governor Gavin Newsom

    The announcement comes with the release of Visit California’s 2024 Economic Impact Report and revised 2025 forecast released today. According to Visit California’s report, in 2024:

    • Visitors spent $157.3 billion at businesses across the state.
    • Tourism spending supported 1.2 million jobs and created 24,000 new jobs.
    • $12.6 billion in state and local tax revenues was generated from tourism.

    Economic progress at risk of Trump Slump

    However, the forecast also anticipates a 1% dip in overall visitation and a 9.2% decline in international visitation in 2025, in direct response to federal economic policy and an impending “Trump Slump.” Looking ahead, 2025 is projected to be more challenging, particularly due to global economic pressures and a slowdown in international tourism, the direct result of declining global sentiment about travel to the United States. California is already seeing the impact, with a sharp year-over-year decline in March of this year.

    In anticipation of the slump caused by the Trump administration, Governor Newsom and Visit California are encouraging Californians to continue to travel within the state to help support the booming tourism industry. The Governor has also launched a new campaign encouraging Canadian consumers to continue to travel to the Golden State.

    More people moving to California 

    In addition to record-breaking tourism, California is welcoming more new residents. Governor Newsom recently announced California’s population increased for the second year in a row. The announcement also noted that previous reports that California’s population had declined by hundreds of thousands of people in 2021 and 2023 were found inaccurate, and since 2021, California’s population has increased by nearly 275,000 people. 

    California’s economic leadership

    With a nation-leading GDP and more Fortune 500 companies than any other state, California’s economy remains a global powerhouse driven by diversity, creativity, and opportunity.

    • 4th largest economy in the world: California’s $4.1 trillion GDP recently surpassed Japan.
    • #1 in the nation: Leads the U.S. in Fortune 500 companies, new business starts, venture capital access, manufacturing output, high-tech industries and agriculture.
    • Major trade powerhouse: Over $675 billion in two-way trade, making California the largest importer among U.S. states and a key driver of job creation.
    • Manufacturing hub: Home to 36,000+ manufacturing firms, employing over 1.1 million workers, with strengths in aerospace, electronics, and zero-emission vehicles.
    • AI & innovation leader: California hosts 32 of the world’s top 50 AI companies and produces 25% of global AI patents and conference papers.

    Recent news

    May 2, 2025

    News SACRAMENTO — Governor Gavin Newsom issued the following statement today after the University of California Board of Regents named James Milliken the new president of the University of California: “California’s future depends on the strength of our institutions,…

    May 2, 2025

    News What you need to know: As part of the California Jobs First initiative, the state is awarding $30.5 million in tax credits to seven companies committed to creating new jobs and investing over $2.1 billion across key industries like clean energy, advanced…

    May 1, 2025

    News LOS ANGELES — California First Partner Jennifer Siebel Newsom today joined students, mental health professionals, and athletes at two schools in Pasadena and the Boys & Girls Clubs of the Peninsula’s East Palo Alto Clubhouse to celebrate Move Your Body, Calm…

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Agenda – Tuesday, 6 May 2025 – Strasbourg

    Source: European Parliament

    80 Border Regions’ instrument for development and growth (BRIDGEforEU)
    Sandro Gozi (A10-0058/2025)      – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 81 Amending Regulation (EU) 2016/1011 as regards the scope of the rules for benchmarks, the use in the Union of benchmarks provided by an administrator located in a third country, and certain reporting requirements
    Jonás Fernández (A10-0060/2025)      – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 82 European Union labour market statistics on businesses
    Irene Tinagli (A10-0057/2025)      – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 60 Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for Displaced Workers: application EGF/2024/003 BE/Van Hool – Belgium
    Janusz Lewandowski (A10-0080/2025)      – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 41 Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – combating fraud – annual report 2023
    Gilles Boyer (A10-0049/2025)      – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 40 Control of the financial activities of the European Investment Bank – annual report 2023
    Ondřej Knotek (A10-0068/2025)      – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 20 A revamped long-term budget for the Union in a changing world
    Siegfried Mureşan, Carla Tavares (A10-0076/2025)      – Amendments by the rapporteur, 71 MEPs at least; Alternative motions for resolutions Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00     – Joint alternative motions for resolutions Friday, 2 May 2025, 10:00 66 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development Funds
    Niclas Herbst (A10-0074/2025)      – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 68 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Council and Council
    Joachim Stanisław Brudziński (A10-0052/2025)      – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 69 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Court of Justice of the European Union
    Cristian Terheş (A10-0050/2025)      – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 70 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Court of Auditors
    Dick Erixon (A10-0047/2025)      – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 71 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Economic and Social Committee
    Joachim Stanisław Brudziński (A10-0054/2025)      – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 72 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Committee of the Regions
    Joachim Stanisław Brudziński (A10-0046/2025)      – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 73 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Ombudsman
    Joachim Stanisław Brudziński (A10-0055/2025)      – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 74 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Data Protection Supervisor
    Joachim Stanisław Brudziński (A10-0053/2025)      – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 75 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European External Action Service
    Joachim Stanisław Brudziński (A10-0069/2025)      – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 76 Discharge 2023: European Public Prosecutor’s Office
    Tomáš Zdechovský (A10-0051/2025)      – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 77 Discharge 2023: Agencies
    Erik Marquardt (A10-0065/2025)      – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 78 Discharge 2023: Joint Undertakings
    Michal Wiezik (A10-0056/2025)      – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 39 The European Water Resilience Strategy
    Thomas Bajada (A10-0073/2025)      – Amendments by the rapporteur, 71 MEPs at least; Alternative motions for resolutions Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 43 2023 and 2024 reports on Türkiye
    Nacho Sánchez Amor (A10-0067/2025)      – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 102 2023 and 2024 reports on Serbia
    Tonino Picula (A10-0072/2025)      – Amendments Friday, 2 May 2025, 12:00 104 2023 and 2024 reports on Kosovo
    Riho Terras (A10-0075/2025)      – Amendments Friday, 2 May 2025, 12:00 Separate votes – Split votes – Roll-call votes Texts put to the vote on Tuesday Friday, 2 May 2025, 12:00 Texts put to the vote on Wednesday Monday, 5 May 2025, 19:00 Texts put to the vote on Thursday Tuesday, 6 May 2025, 19:00 Motions for resolutions concerning debates on cases of breaches of human rights, democracy and the rule of law (Rule 150) Wednesday, 7 May 2025, 19:00

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Agenda – Thursday, 8 May 2025 – Strasbourg

    Source: European Parliament

    110 Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market
    (O-000012/2025 – B10-0005/25)      – Motions for resolutions Monday, 5 May 2025, 19:00     – Amendments to motions for resolutions; joint motions for resolutions Tuesday, 6 May 2025, 19:00     – Amendments to joint motions for resolutions Tuesday, 6 May 2025, 20:00     – Requests for “separate”, “split” and “roll-call” votes Wednesday, 7 May 2025, 16:00 98 Arrest and risk of execution of Tundu Lissu, Chair of Chadema, the main opposition party in Tanzania     – Motions for resolutions (Rule 150) Monday, 5 May 2025, 20:00     – Amendments to motions for resolutions; joint motions for resolutions (Rule 150) Wednesday, 7 May 2025, 13:00     – Amendments to joint motions for resolutions (Rule 150) Wednesday, 7 May 2025, 14:00 99 Return of Ukrainian children forcibly transferred and deported by Russia     – Motions for resolutions (Rule 150) Monday, 5 May 2025, 20:00     – Amendments to motions for resolutions; joint motions for resolutions (Rule 150) Wednesday, 7 May 2025, 13:00     – Amendments to joint motions for resolutions (Rule 150) Wednesday, 7 May 2025, 14:00 100 Violations of religious freedom in Tibet     – Motions for resolutions (Rule 150) Monday, 5 May 2025, 20:00     – Amendments to motions for resolutions; joint motions for resolutions (Rule 150) Wednesday, 7 May 2025, 13:00     – Amendments to joint motions for resolutions (Rule 150) Wednesday, 7 May 2025, 14:00 107 The role of gas storage for securing gas supplies ahead of the winter season
    Borys Budka (A10-0079/2025)      – Amendments Friday, 2 May 2025, 12:00 109 Screening of foreign investments in the Union
    Raphaël Glucksmann (A10-0061/2025)      – Amendments Friday, 2 May 2025, 12:00 108 Suspending certain parts of Regulation (EU) 2015/478 as regards imports of Ukrainian products into the European Union
    Karin Karlsbro (A10-0059/2025)      – Amendments Friday, 2 May 2025, 12:00 57 Competition policy – annual report 2024
    Lara Wolters (A10-0071/2025)      – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 21 Banking Union – annual report 2024
    Ralf Seekatz (A10-0044/2025)      – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 106 Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3): genetically modified soybean MON 87705 × MON 87708 × MON 89788     – Amendments Friday, 2 May 2025, 12:00 Separate votes – Split votes – Roll-call votes Texts put to the vote on Tuesday Friday, 2 May 2025, 12:00 Texts put to the vote on Wednesday Monday, 5 May 2025, 19:00 Texts put to the vote on Thursday Tuesday, 6 May 2025, 19:00 Motions for resolutions concerning debates on cases of breaches of human rights, democracy and the rule of law (Rule 150) Wednesday, 7 May 2025, 19:00

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Agenda – Wednesday, 7 May 2025 – Strasbourg

    Source: European Parliament

    66 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development Funds
    Niclas Herbst (A10-0074/2025)      – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 68 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Council and Council
    Joachim Stanisław Brudziński (A10-0052/2025)      – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 69 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Court of Justice of the European Union
    Cristian Terheş (A10-0050/2025)      – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 70 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Court of Auditors
    Dick Erixon (A10-0047/2025)      – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 71 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Economic and Social Committee
    Joachim Stanisław Brudziński (A10-0054/2025)      – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 72 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Committee of the Regions
    Joachim Stanisław Brudziński (A10-0046/2025)      – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 73 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Ombudsman
    Joachim Stanisław Brudziński (A10-0055/2025)      – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 74 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Data Protection Supervisor
    Joachim Stanisław Brudziński (A10-0053/2025)      – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 75 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European External Action Service
    Joachim Stanisław Brudziński (A10-0069/2025)      – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 76 Discharge 2023: European Public Prosecutor’s Office
    Tomáš Zdechovský (A10-0051/2025)      – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 77 Discharge 2023: Agencies
    Erik Marquardt (A10-0065/2025)      – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 78 Discharge 2023: Joint Undertakings
    Michal Wiezik (A10-0056/2025)      – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 20 A revamped long-term budget for the Union in a changing world
    Siegfried Mureşan, Carla Tavares (A10-0076/2025)      – Amendments by the rapporteur, 71 MEPs at least; Alternative motions for resolutions Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00     – Joint alternative motions for resolutions Friday, 2 May 2025, 10:00 39 The European Water Resilience Strategy
    Thomas Bajada (A10-0073/2025)      – Amendments by the rapporteur, 71 MEPs at least; Alternative motions for resolutions Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 43 2023 and 2024 reports on Türkiye
    Nacho Sánchez Amor (A10-0067/2025)      – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 102 2023 and 2024 reports on Serbia
    Tonino Picula (A10-0072/2025)      – Amendments Friday, 2 May 2025, 12:00 104 2023 and 2024 reports on Kosovo
    Riho Terras (A10-0075/2025)      – Amendments Friday, 2 May 2025, 12:00 57 Competition policy – annual report 2024
    Lara Wolters (A10-0071/2025)      – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 107 The role of gas storage for securing gas supplies ahead of the winter season
    Borys Budka (A10-0079/2025)      – Amendments Friday, 2 May 2025, 12:00 21 Banking Union – annual report 2024
    Ralf Seekatz (A10-0044/2025)      – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 98 Arrest and risk of execution of Tundu Lissu, Chair of Chadema, the main opposition party in Tanzania     – Motions for resolutions (Rule 150) Monday, 5 May 2025, 20:00     – Amendments to motions for resolutions; joint motions for resolutions (Rule 150) Wednesday, 7 May 2025, 13:00     – Amendments to joint motions for resolutions (Rule 150) Wednesday, 7 May 2025, 14:00 99 Return of Ukrainian children forcibly transferred and deported by Russia     – Motions for resolutions (Rule 150) Monday, 5 May 2025, 20:00     – Amendments to motions for resolutions; joint motions for resolutions (Rule 150) Wednesday, 7 May 2025, 13:00     – Amendments to joint motions for resolutions (Rule 150) Wednesday, 7 May 2025, 14:00 100 Violations of religious freedom in Tibet     – Motions for resolutions (Rule 150) Monday, 5 May 2025, 20:00     – Amendments to motions for resolutions; joint motions for resolutions (Rule 150) Wednesday, 7 May 2025, 13:00     – Amendments to joint motions for resolutions (Rule 150) Wednesday, 7 May 2025, 14:00 Separate votes – Split votes – Roll-call votes Texts put to the vote on Tuesday Friday, 2 May 2025, 12:00 Texts put to the vote on Wednesday Monday, 5 May 2025, 19:00 Texts put to the vote on Thursday Tuesday, 6 May 2025, 19:00 Motions for resolutions concerning debates on cases of breaches of human rights, democracy and the rule of law (Rule 150) Wednesday, 7 May 2025, 19:00

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Agenda – Monday, 5 May 2025 – Strasbourg

    Source: European Parliament

    41 Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – combating fraud – annual report 2023
    Gilles Boyer (A10-0049/2025) 
        – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00
    40 Control of the financial activities of the European Investment Bank – annual report 2023
    Ondřej Knotek (A10-0068/2025) 
        – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00
    Texts put to the vote on Tuesday Friday, 2 May 2025, 12:00
    Texts put to the vote on Wednesday Monday, 5 May 2025, 19:00
    Texts put to the vote on Thursday Tuesday, 6 May 2025, 19:00
    Motions for resolutions concerning debates on cases of breaches of human rights, democracy and the rule of law (Rule 150) Wednesday, 7 May 2025, 19:00

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Absorption of Recovery and Resilience Facility funds by Greece – E-000948/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Recovery and Resilience Facility[1] (RRF) supports 103 investments and 76 reforms in Greece as set out in a national plan (Greece 2.0) submitted by the Greek authorities to the Commission.

    Disbursement of funds is based on satisfactory fulfilment of related milestones and targets following an assessment carried out by the Commission[2].

    This assessment concerns the fulfilment of the requirements set out in the Council Implementing Decision[3] and verification is based on related evidence submitted by the Greek authorities (e.g. adoption of a law).

    So far, 51% of RRF funds has been disbursed to Greece, and following the recent endorsement by the Commission of the fifth payment request for EUR 3.1 billion, total disbursements to the country will reach 59% in the next months.

    The Greek authorities have adopted measures to facilitate the smooth implementation of the plan and boost administrative capacity, including through the establishment of a dedicated agency (EYSTA) that is part of the Greek Ministry of Economy and Finance.

    In the Council’s country-specific recommendations to Greece of July 2024[4], Greece is further recommended to strengthen administrative capacity to manage EU funds, including RRF funds, accelerate investments, and maintain momentum in the implementation of reforms.

    Greece is notably recommended to address challenges related to: (i) lengthy litigation processes in public procurement procedures that risk causing delays in investments; (ii) slow transfer of property rights; and (iii) weak coordination among Ministries.

    • [1] https://commission.europa.eu/business-economy-euro/economic-recovery/recovery-and-resilience-facility_en
    • [2] https://commission.europa.eu/business-economy-euro/economic-recovery/recovery-and-resilience-facility/country-pages/greeces-recovery-and-resilience-plan_en
    • [3] https://commission.europa.eu/document/download/803810c9-c307-412e-8e9e-238ae6e76734_en?filename=COM_2024_591_1_EN_annexe_proposition_cp_part1_v4.pdf
    • [4] https://commission.europa.eu/document/download/96abbf09-3934-40a6-b234-f60c93928a87_en?filename=com_2024_608_1_en.pdf
    Last updated: 5 May 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Support for the 100 climate-neutral cities under the Green Deal – E-000580/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    In Greece there is a momentum for the EU Climate Neutral and Smart Cities Mission[1]; of the six Greek cities selected for the Cities Mission, five have already received the Mission Label.

    These cities established the ‘Climanet’ network, and the Greek Government announced EUR 20 million to be allocated to these cities for the preparation of studies and the financing of projects[2].

    At European level, 53 Cities have so far been awarded with a Mission Label. A further 33 Climate City Contracts are now under review. 80 more cities have joined the Twinning Learning Programme[3] to replicate good practices: nine are Greek cities[4].

    The Climate City Capital Hub[5], launched in June 2024, helps labelled cities[6] to get projects ready for investment. It offers advice on financing solutions, in cooperation with existing advisory services, such as those offered by the European Investment Bank (EIB), and puts cities in touch with investors.

    Through the ‘Enabling City Transformation Programme’ under Horizon Europe, EUR 21 million were secured in 2024 to deploy advisory services of the EIB[7]. In addition, the EIB ringfenced a lending envelope of EUR 2 billion for the labelled cities to support the implementation of their decarbonisation strategies.

    Greek Mission cities will also receive support from EU Cohesion Policy and, in line with the European Regional Development Fund/Cohesion Fund Regulation[8], they are implementing their sustainable urban development strategies, to support energy efficiency, climate adaptation, smart cities and green transport projects.

    Finally, EU actions, such as the Covenant of Mayors[9], the Green City Accord[10], the European Urban Initiative[11], the URBACT IV programme[12] and others, support cities in capacity-building and knowledge exchange.

    • [1] https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/funding/funding-opportunities/funding-programmes-and-open-calls/horizon-europe/eu-missions-horizon-europe/climate-neutral-and-smart-cities_en
    • [2] https://2030.ioannina.gr/?page_id=1121
    • [3] https://netzerocities.eu/twinning-learning-programme/
    • [4] These are Penteli, Palaio Faliro, Mytilene and Vari-Voula-Vouliagmeni (selected for Cohort 1); Chalkida and Chios (in Cohort 2); Fyli, Heraklion and Larisa (in Cohort 3).
    • [5] https://netzerocities.eu/capital-hub/
    • [6] https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/document/942e747e-3ccf-4121-a973-9cc8032fc421_en
    • [7] Including European Local ENergy Assistance (https://www.eib.org/en/products/advisory-services/elena/index)
      and the InvestEU Advisory Hub (https://investeu.europa.eu/investeu-programme/investeu-advisory-hub_en).
    • [8]  OJ L231, 30/06/2021, Article 11.
    • [9] https://eu-mayors.ec.europa.eu/en/home
    • [10] https://environment.ec.europa.eu/topics/urban-environment/green-city-accord_en
    • [11] https://www.urban-initiative.eu/
    • [12] https://urbact.eu/

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Total funding to Türkiye – E-001586/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001586/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Emmanouil Fragkos (ECR)

    Türkiye has been funded mainly through the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA). From 2002-2022, Türkiye received more than €9 billion, with the objectives of ‘supporting political reforms, strengthening civil society, protecting the environment and promoting regional development and the rule of law’.

    During the first IPA programming period (2007–2013), Türkiye received around €4.8 billion. In the second phase (2014–2020), €4.5 billion was approved, but part of this was ‘frozen’ due to events following the ‘2016 coup’. From 2021 onwards, funding continued under supposedly stricter conditions and supposedly increased oversight.

    The EU has also provided funding for ‘humanitarian programmes for Syrian refugees in Türkiye, through the Facility for Refugees in Türkiye’, amounting to over €6 billion since 2016 to date.

    In total, Türkiye has received over €18 billion from the EU through these two main mechanisms. In addition, the European Investment Bank has provided Türkiye with loans of €29.3 billion for 278 projects from 1987 to 2018, further strengthening the EU’s financial support to the country.

    Can the Commission, in terms of the value of the euro today, calculate the total amount of grants, technical assistance and soft loans to Türkiye?

    Submitted: 21.4.2025

    Last updated: 5 May 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – From development aid to economic diplomacy – E-001680/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001680/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Benoit Cassart (Renew)

    Many African countries yearn to take control of their economic future. The continent is experiencing unprecedented population growth: it will have a population of 2.5 billion by 2050, and an educated, connected and urbanised youth is emerging, in search of economic opportunities and industrialisation.

    Dynamic economic hubs – such as Nigeria, Kenya, Ghana, Morocco and Egypt – are asserting their desire for internally generated development, focusing on strategic sectors such as renewable energies, the digital sector, agro-industry and services. Africa is therefore seeking reciprocal economic partnerships that integrate investment, technology transfer, innovation and the development of local economies.

    • 1.Given the rapid development of Africa’s economies and mounting global competition, can the Commission continue to rely solely on a development aid approach or should it bring about a paradigm shift, establishing genuine economic diplomacy that is more agile, more proactive and better coordinated, based on partnerships of equals with Africa?
    • 2.Should the Commission not ensure a greater role for Europe’s private sector – often absent from the major Global Gateway operations – and improve financing and guarantee mechanisms for EU companies willing to invest on the African continent?

    Submitted: 25.4.2025

    Last updated: 5 May 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – The need to protect entrepreneurship in the European countryside and islands in the face of the tariff war – E-001674/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001674/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Fredis Beleris (PPE)

    The new reality of the tariff war that has broken out is changing the way businesses operate, since it creates major challenges, especially for the developing peripheries of Europe. The industries and crafts that were active in the countryside and on islands constituted the ‘lungs’ of local economies and allowed residents to remain in situ.

    The complexity of European rules and deficiencies in infrastructure remain significant difficulties, which prevent entrepreneurship in remote and island areas, leading to the closure of industries in many of them. This has led to the transfer of a large part of the production of many companies to non-EU countries, whether bordering the EU or not, which are naturally outside the regulatory framework. It is telling that many everyday products reach the European market with a ‘European stamp’, without however being produced in the EU, making our continent dependent on non-EU countries and affected by possible trade tariffs.

    In view of the above:

    • 1.Does the Commission intend to carry out an assessment of the impact of de-industrialisation on the local economy of remote and island regions?
    • 2.Does the Commission intend to provide financial incentives for the development of the primary and secondary sectors in areas on the verge of economic and productive decline, and in particular in remote and island regions?
    • 3.Does the Commission intend to introduce into European industrial policy the management of the challenges of de-industrialisation of remote and island regions?

    Submitted: 25.4.2025

    Last updated: 5 May 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Beneficiaries and amounts invested under the MediaInvest instrument? – E-000858/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    MediaInvest[1], a part of the InvestEU[2] programme, is a dedicated equity investment vehicle aimed at stimulating private investment in the audiovisual and gaming sectors. It is implemented by the European Investment Fund[3] (EIF) on behalf of the Commission.

    To date, the EIF has signed four deals under MediaInvest ( Logical Content Ventures (France), focusing on content production; Behold Ventures (Sweden) focusing on video games sector; IPR.VC (Finland) focusing on European films and TV series; Together S.L.P (France), focusing on audiovisual small and medium enterprises).

    The EIF publishes once a year on its website a list of (i) financial intermediaries[4] being supported via InvestEU, including MediaInvest; and (ii) final beneficiaries[5] that have received financial support via InvestEU for an amount of at least EUR 500 000.

    As announced in the communication ‘The Road to the next multiannual financial framework’[6], the Commission intends to present its proposal for the next multiannual financial framework in July 2025.

    InvestEU aim at ensuring that financial intermediaries commit to invest a minimum amount into EU eligible companies. In addition, MediaInvest requires that a significant percentage of the investments targets audiovisual projects based in the EU.

    • [1] https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/mediainvest
    • [2] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=LEGISSUM:4516649
    • [3] eif.org/index.htm
    • [4] www.eif.org
    • [5] https://www.eif.org/InvestEU/equity_products/ieu-equity-visibility-report-final-recipients.pdf
    • [6] COM(2025) 46 final.
    Last updated: 5 May 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Arbitrary use by Italian Government of golden power in the banking sector – E-001673/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001673/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Gaetano Pedulla’ (The Left), Pasquale Tridico (The Left)

    In recent months, Italy’s financial system has been going through a wide-ranging overhaul involving some of its main credit institutions and their public exchange offers – among others UniCredit’s bid for Banco BPM and the bid by Monte dei Paschi di Siena (MPS) for Mediobanca.

    Although they are all Italian companies, the government decided to intervene in those transactions, exercising its golden power in the UniCredit offer by laying down a number of seemingly spurious requirements and penalties, but the same criterion was not applied to MPS’ bid for Mediobanca. That unequal treatment has seriously undermined government neutrality with regard to the market, not least because it came shortly before the most recent Generali insurance group shareholders’ meeting. Mediobanca is its largest shareholder and UniCredit holds a significant stake in that group.

    On 6 April 2025, the Commission launched a procedure on this matter as a whole with the Italian Government for informal discussions on the use of golden powers.

    In the light of the above, can the Commission clarify whether it considers the Italian Government in breach of market rules – on the grounds of its misuse of golden powers with regard to UniCredit and, at the same time, undue support for MPS, weakening Mediobanca, the subject of a public exchange offer – or not?

    Submitted: 24.4.2025

    Last updated: 5 May 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Choosing economic cooperation with Türkiye without clear political conditions goes against European values – E-001678/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001678/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Emmanouil Kefalogiannis (PPE)

    Choosing economic cooperation with Türkiye without clear political conditions goes against European values, putting the credibility of the Union at risk.

    The ‘High-Level Economic Dialogue’ between the EU and Türkiye, held under the auspices of the Commission with the participation of the Turkish Minister of Finance, raises questions about the EU’s consistency. The dialogue, the first since 2019, is taking place at a time when Türkiye is stepping up attacks on press freedom and the persecution of mayors and others.

    The EU-Türkiye Joint Parliamentary Committee has decided to postpone the meeting in Ankara and, despite the correct decision of the Commissioner for Enlargement to cancel her participation in the diplomatic forum in Antalya and her participation in the Parliamentary Committee, the EU – by way of its decision to co-organise the economic dialogue – is raising questions about the consistency of its approach towards Türkiye. The EU must ensure that economic relations with Türkiye do not undermine its unwavering commitment to democratic principles and the rule of law.

    The Commission is therefore asked:

    • 1.What criteria were taken into account for the resumption of the economic dialogue?
    • 2.How is it ensured that the resumption of EU-Türkiye economic relations is not perceived by Türkiye as a reward for its authoritarian policies?

    Submitted: 25.4.2025

    Last updated: 5 May 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Funding, payments and learner fees – Youth Guarantee

    Source:

    For the full requirements, see the Youth Guarantee funding conditions for the relevant year.
    Funding mechanism
    The Minister responsible for tertiary education issues the YG funding mechanism. The funding mechanism outlines the general form and essential components of the fund. It provides the mandate for the Tertiary Education Commission (TEC) to allocate the funding and what the funding can be used for, and details how we administer the fund.
    Funding is agreed through a tertiary education organisation’s (TEO’s) Investment Plan. For more information see Plan guidance and toolkit.
    A TEO that receives YG funding is required to:

    The overall amount of YG funding available is set through the Government’s annual budget process. We determine the appropriate amount of YG funding for a TEO through the annual investment process and in-year additional funding requests (if available). 
    Funding allocation and payments
    Funding allocations, including any amendments, are available through the My Allocations and Payments app on Ngā Kete.
    YG funding is paid in equal monthly instalments.
    After each Single Data Return (SDR) submission we pay (and recover) Youth Guarantee Exceptional Circumstances Travel Assistance funding.
    For the calculation of indicative allocations see the methodology from the relevant year. The most recent information is at the top.
    For more details regarding your specific allocation, please contact customerservice@tec.govt.nz or your Relationship Manager.
    Funding rates
    There are two funding rates for all YG provision – the trades and non-trades rates per EFTS.
    The trades funding rate applies to trades provision at Levels 2 and 3 on the New Zealand Qualifications and Credentials Framework (NZQCF).
    The non-trades rate applies to all other provision at Levels 1 to 3 on the NZQCF.
    This page provides information on the YG funding rates.
    Funding wash-ups
    For the calculation of funding wash-ups see the methodology and technical specifications from the relevant year.
    Premium allocation
    We will allocate the 50% funding premium for the Level 1 and 2 programmes in your Level 1 and 2 commitment
    We will allocate the YG premium based on your Level 1 and 2 commitments in your YG Mix of Provision (MoP).
    We will calculate your final delivery against your total YG allocation, including the Level 1 and 2 premium and recovery if you were overpaid.
    We will adjust your premium allocation, if required, due to other significant Plan changes
    Significant Plan changes during the year may affect the amount of Level 1 and 2 premium required, for example if we have agreed a change in the total allocated, or there is a change in the distribution of your commitments within the allocation. If necessary, we will recalculate and adjust your premium allocation.
    We will carefully review your submitted MoP to ensure we allocate the correct amount
    We will monitor closely to ensure you allocate accurately as agreed with TEC in your MoP. This includes any changes agreed within the year. We will only accept and approve the MoP if the commitment is within the MoP tolerance (tolerance value identified in MoP instructions tab), and the distribution of the funding is in line with what was agreed and approved by the TEC. MoPs must be submitted in a timely matter.
    We will take into account previous delivery patterns, and any specific agreements you have with us regarding changes to your MoP.
    Wellbeing and pathways support subsidy
    The wellbeing and pathways support subsidy is intended to fund a range of services tailored to the needs of individual learners. This may include:

    career planning and advice
    specific cultural and learning support that is easy for the learner to access
    an orientation programme that informs learners about access to financial assistance
    extra-curricular activities
    regular activities with other YG learners
    building workplace connections, and/or

    From 2023, TEOs are expected to work with learners and their whānau to develop a pathway plan to map “where to from here”. The plan should support each learner’s needs to move to further study and/or employment. For more information on what should be included in the pathway plan refer to the YG funding conditions
    We will allocate the wellbeing and pathways support allocation based on your total EFTS commitment in your MoP
    We will calculate and pay the subsidy separately to your other YG funding.
    We will not recover any of the subsidy where under-delivery occurs.
    We will pay the subsidy on all eligible Flexible Funding over-delivery (up to 102% of your allocation) based on your December SDR reporting.
    We will adjust your wellbeing and pathways support allocation, if required, due to other significant Plan changes
    Significant Plan changes during the year may affect the amount of wellbeing and pathways support allocation you are entitled to, for example if we have agreed a change in the total allocated. If necessary, we will recalculate and adjust your wellbeing and pathways support allocation.
    Travel assistance funding
    For the full travel assistance funding requirements, see the Youth Guarantee funding conditions for the relevant year.
    Travel assistance funding must only be used to pay for the actual cost of transport. We expect TEOs to take an “actual and reasonable” approach to the reimbursement of learner travel costs. This means if a learner uses:

    public transport, the reimbursement of the student must be based on the appropriate concession rate, or
    private transport, where suitable public transport is not available, a reasonable reimbursement rate should be established by the TEO on a case-by-case basis.

    If the TEO supplies the transport, the cost of the travel must not exceed 80 cents per kilometre travelled.
    Travel assistance funding that is paid directly to a learner must only be used to cover or reimburse costs associated with travel to and from the YG course.
    Records
    The TEO must keep records of all learner travel expenses and TEO reimbursements to learners.
    If the TEO supplies transport to learners, it must keep records of travel expenses. All travel records are to be made available to us on request. Records must include:

    a daily travel logbook that sets out the kilometres travelled in relation to each learner, and
    the source of funding for each learner’s enrolment at the TEO (for example, whether the learner is enrolled in a YG funded programme or otherwise).

    Inland Revenue
    If the TEO supplies transport, the TEO must keep records of travel expenses in line with Inland Revenue requirements.
    There may be tax implications in the way that travel reimbursements are administered. Contact Inland Revenue directly for further information.
    When reimbursing learners for travel, in general, TEOs are not able to claim GST input tax on this cost because the payments are made to individuals who are not registered for GST. GST input tax can only be claimed if the TEO has incurred the cost itself and can produce a GST invoice in support of the claim.
    Travel subsidy
    The travel assistance subsidy is expected to adequately meet the costs associated with normal learner travel needs.
    As the travel subsidy is allocated per EFTS, the TEO may cross-subsidise by using more than the per EFTS rate for some learners (ie, where they have particularly high travel expenses), and less than the per EFTS rate for others (where they do not require the full amount).
    The TEO must reimburse each learner within a reasonable time after they have incurred the cost.
    Exceptional Circumstances Transport Assistance funding
    Exceptional Circumstances Transport Assistance (ECTA) funding is to provide additional transport assistance to learners who live in relatively isolated areas who may have higher transport needs.
    For the full exceptional circumstances transport assistance funding requirements, see the Youth Guarantee funding conditions for the relevant year.
    ECTA funding is based on EFTS delivered, and the rural isolation of the site where the delivery took place. The rural isolation of TEOs’ delivery sites uses a classification system developed by Statistics New Zealand. 
    Based on the urban/rural classification we provide a “top-up” payment per YG EFTS at each delivery site as reported in each SDR submission.
    Funding calculation
    Disaggregated courses must add up to the total credit value of the qualification, but unlike Delivery Qualification (DQ) funding, Youth Guarantee is not funded at the course level.
    For a trades programme at Levels 2 and 3 the funding calculation is: trades rate per EFTS x programme EFTS value. Trades programmes include NCEA where at least 50% of the courses are classified under Delivery at Levels 7 (degree) and above on the NZQCF delivery classification codes – alphabetic and numeric – as C1, L1, or P1. 
    For a non-trades programmes the funding calculation is: non-trades rate per EFTS x programme EFTS value. Non-trade programmes include NCEA where less than 50% of the courses are classified as trades courses.
    Specifically, we calculate a TEO’s consumed funding using:

    the number of valid domestic student enrolments, measured by equivalent full-time students (EFTS), and
    the programmes, and their component courses, in which a valid domestic student is enrolled.

    To calculate a TEO’s consumed Youth Guarantee funding, we use the following elements:

    the metric (EFTS value)
    delivery classification
    funding category (trades/non-trades, which may also depend on level on the NZQCF), and
    funding rate. 

    Example only (rates may differ depending on year):

    Step

    Funding calculation 

    Example

    1

    Assign the programme an EFTS value

    A TEO’s NZ2104 New Zealand Certificate in Food and Beverage (Level 3) obtained through half a year of academic year study has a value of 0.5 EFTS.
    Note: We use 120 credits per EFTS for all programmes in STEO.

    2

    Assign the programme a funding rate

    This is determined in conjunction with us. The rate will be trade or non-trade, depending on whether the majority of course EFTS are trades or non-trades.

    3

    Disaggregate the programme into courses
    Calculate the EFTS factor of each course (Note: We use 120 credits per EFTS for all courses in STEO)
    Classify the courses

    The programme is disaggregated into three courses.
    Each course has an EFTS factor of 0.1667 EFTS.
    The subject matter of these courses is classified as #22 (Trades) in the Delivery Classification Guide.

    4

    Apply the funding category

    Refer to Funding category (CATEGORY) under information about courses:
    The funding category alphabetic code is used to determine the category of the course as P (Trades #22).
    The funding category numeric code is used to determine the category of the course as 1 (non-degree course with no research requirement, including certificates and diplomas). 

    5

    Apply funding rates

    The funding rate for provision towards a trade programme, including transport subsidy, is $14,981 per EFTS, plus $2,000 per EFTS wellbeing and pathways support subsidy.

    6

    Multiply the funding rate by the number of valid enrolments

    For 10 students on each of the 3 courses, each course attracts Youth Guarantee funding of $28,307.33 (excl. GST) calculated as (0.1667 x $14,981 x 10 = $24,973.33) + (0.1667 x $2,000 x 10 = $3,334.00).
    This means the programme attracts $84,921.99 funding if 10 students enrol in each of the 3 programme courses.
    Note: From 2023, for Level 1 and 2 programmes, we pay a 50% premium in addition to each EFTS reported in your Single Data Return (SDR). This is to acknowledge our YG definition of an EFTS being 80 credits for Level 1 and 2 programme delivery.

    Calculating funding for Level 1 and 2 provision
    From 2023 onwards, we recognise that 80 credits is a full-time, full-year workload for a learner enrolled in a Level 1 or 2 Youth Guarantee programme (or programmes) (one EFTS).
    As a result TEOs will receive 50% more funding for delivery of EFTS towards Level 1 and 2 programmes.
    The amount paid will be determined by the volume of Levels 1–3 course enrolment EFTS that lead towards Level 1 and 2 Youth Guarantee qualifications, as reported in the SDR.
    We will fund up to 120 credits worth of delivery per learner in a calendar year.
    You must not enrol a learner in more than:

    1.5 EFTS (120 credits) for programmes leading to Level 1 and/or 2 Youth Guarantee qualifications; and
    1.0 EFTS (120 credits) for programmes leading to Level 3 Youth Guarantee qualifications.

    We will continue to fund up to 120 credits worth of delivery per learner in a calendar year.

    Student’s 2023 enrolments

    Credits

    2023 EFTS

    Credits ‘funded’

    Definition

    Delivered

    Reported in the SDR

    Funded (includes premium payment)

    New Zealand Certificate in Foundation Skills (Level 2)

    60

    80 credits

    0.7500

    0.5000

    0.7500*

    60

    New Zealand Certificate in Apiculture (Level 3)

    65

    120 credits

    0.5417

    0.5417

    0.5417

    65

    Total

    125

    N/A

    1.2917

    1.0417

    1.2917

    125

    *  0.500 Level 2 EFTS reported in the SDR plus the 50% premium = 0.750 Level 2 EFTS funded.
    Re-enrolling a Youth Guarantee student
    Where a YG learner requires further study to complete their programme, their study can only be to complete courses that they have not yet passed. This can include content not yet studied or content studied and assessed, but requiring a re-sit. 
    Note: A learner who turns 25 years old while enrolled is not eligible to re-enrol.
    For example:
    A TEO enrols a learner in all courses linked to a 60-credit (0.5 EFTS) Level 3 programme. The sum of the course EFTS factors is 0.5 EFTS.
    The learner passes/achieves 30 credits from the 60-credit course enrolments. The TEO is funded 0.5 EFTS, for the 60 credits of courses the learner was enrolled in.
    The TEO re-enrols the learner in a second period of study for the remaining 30 credits not yet achieved. The TEO is funded 0.25 EFTS for the 30 credits of courses the learner was re-enrolled in.
    The learner successfully completes the courses and is awarded the qualification.
    The learner will have received 0.75 EFTS worth of provision (90 credits), and the TEO will be funded for 0.75 EFTS delivery (0.5 + 0.25 EFTS) (assuming funding conditions are met for each course enrolment). 
    Note: The TEO will report 0.25 EFTS (30 credits) unsuccessful course completions, and 0.5 EFTS (60 credits) successful course completions.
    Calculating EFTS remaining vs consumed
    To determine the exact value of the EFTS remaining for a returning learner, the following formula should be used:

    Qual EFTS value – (credits completed/total qual credits x qual EFTS value) = remaining EFTS

    For example:
    0.5 – (30/60 x 0.5)
    = 0.5 – 0.25
    = 0.25 remaining EFTS

    Notes: 
    You will need to ensure that when a learner needs more time to complete their programme, other learners are enrolled to ensure you deliver fully on your Mix of Provision (MoP) EFTS commitment and consume all funding for the year. 
    Consider a learner’s course re-enrolments before you enrol them in a further programme. Where a learner does not complete a course successfully and you re-enrol them and claim funding, the learner is consuming additional EFTS towards their entitlements.
    Flexible funding
    We fund eligible TEOs for eligible Youth Guarantee provision above the amount the TEO has been approved to deliver. This is to provide TEOs with flexibility to meet additional learner demand. 
    For further information about flexible funding, please see the Youth Guarantee funding conditions for the relevant year.
    Flexible funding:

    is payable for provision towards qualifications that we have agreed to fund in your Mix of Provision (MoP)
    does not mean we have changed your approved funding allocation, and
    is subject to the conditions that we have imposed on your funding.

    The external evaluation and review (EER) category referred to in the funding conditions will be the highest published EER category for the TEO during the funding year to which flexible funding is being applied.
    Flexible funding is calculated using the December Single Data Return (SDR). Payments are made in March of the following year.
    Suspending or revoking funding
    Under clause 16 of Schedule 18 of the Education and Training Act 2020 (the Act), we may suspend or revoke some or all funding given under section 425 of the Act if we are satisfied on reasonable grounds that:

    when measured against performance indicators, the TEO has not achieved, or is not achieving, an outcome anticipated in its Investment Plan for a tertiary education programme or activity in relation to which funding has been given under section 425 of the Act, or
    the TEO has not complied, or is not complying, with a condition on which funding has been given under section 425 of the Act, or
    the TEO has not provided, or is not providing, adequate and timely information required by the TEC or Ministry of Education under section 425 of the Act.

    If a TEO has its funding approval revoked in accordance with clause 16 of Schedule 18 of the Act, the unspent portion of funding is repayable to us on demand (see the Youth Guarantee funding conditions for the relevant year). We may offset the amount against any funding payable to the TEO. 
    Subcontracting
    Subcontracting refers to a situation in which a TEO uses TEC funding to pay another organisation to deliver teaching or assessment on its behalf. This excludes:

    teaching and learning activities contracted to individuals or organisations that are not TEOs (for example, an employee on a fixed-term contract, an honorary staff member, or a contract for teaching and learning services with a subject-matter expert for part of the programme such as for First Aid provision)
    research activities or postgraduate research supervision, and
    learning that occurs within vocational placements such a workplace placement or practicum.

    A TEO must not subcontract delivery of any YG funded programme without the prior written approval of NZQA and without prior written consent from us.
    Note: To gain approval, you must demonstrate how the subcontracting arrangement would benefit the YG programme.
    If we approve a subcontract arrangement
    Subcontracting can be agreed in two ways
    If we approve a subcontract arrangement, the subcontracting can be agreed to within a TEO’s Investment Plan (Plan). The subcontracting specified in the Plan will be permitted for the period of the Plan. If the Plan expires then approval will need to be obtained from us again.
    Subcontracting can also be agreed outside of a Plan. Again, the subcontracting specified will be permitted for the period agreed with us.
    At any time, TEOs can contact us to discuss proposed subcontracting.
    Subcontracting TEO obligations
    As specified in section 425 of the Education and Training Act 2020, it is a condition of a TEO receiving funding under section 425 that the TEO will supply to us, from time to time as required by us, and in a form specified by us, any financial, statistical, or other information that we require the TEO to supply.
    Therefore, at any time, we can request information regarding subcontracted activities from the TEO (that has subcontracted another party to carry out the activities).
    In addition, a TEO that has subcontracted another party to carry out its activities:

    must comply with any conditions imposed by us within a consent to subcontract; and
    must ensure that the subcontracted party does not further subcontract any functions; and
    will be accountable to us for the use of the YG funding, including in respect to legislative and funding condition requirements.

    Student Allowance and Student Loan Scheme payments
    A programme must be approved for TEC funding before a learner can access the Student Allowance and Student Loan Schemes. YG learners are only eligible for some aspects of the Student Loan Scheme. For further information on eligibility visit StudyLink.
    Programmes delivered full-time
    We will only approve a YG funded programmes for learner access to Student Allowance Student Loan Schemes if the programme:

    is delivered full-time
    runs for a minimum of 12 weeks, and
    has an EFTS value of at least 0.3.

    A full-time YG programme must be made up of at least 0.5 EFTS, comprising one or more qualifications. Where there is recognition of prior learning (RPL) for some of the programme, the learner’s individual programme following RPL must be at least 0.5 EFTS.
    Programmes delivered part-time
    A programme of less than 0.3 EFTS is classified as part-time regardless of the number of weeks over which it is delivered. A part-time programme is not eligible for learner access to the Student Allowance Scheme.
    For a YG funded part-time programme leading to a qualification, we will only approve learner access to the Student Loan Scheme if the programme meets one of the following criteria:

    it runs for 32 weeks or more and has an EFTS value of at least 0.3 EFTS, or
    it runs for fewer than 32 weeks with an EFTS value of between 0.25 and 0.3 EFTS.

    Loan entry threshold
    The loan entry threshold (LET) is used to identify the minimum EFTS value required for a learner’s individual study programme to be deemed full-time. This affects learner eligibility for the Student Allowance and Student Loan Schemes. A programme that is not deemed to be full-time (ie, not approved for access to the Student Allowance and Student Loan Schemes) can nevertheless be funded through YG. 
    The LET is determined by matching a range of gross weeks to a range of EFTS values. A gross week is the total length of enrolment in a programme, including holiday weeks.
    The table below shows this relationship. Programmes of less than 0.3 EFTS may still be eligible for learner access to the Student Loan Scheme.

    Loan entry threshold table

    Length of enrolment(Gross weeks)

    Loan entry threshold(EFTS)

    12

    0.3

    13

    0.3

    14

    0.3

    15

    0.3

    16

    0.4

    17

    0.4

    18

    0.4

    19

    0.4

    20

    0.5

    21

    0.525

    22

    0.55

    23

    0.575

    24

    0.6

    25

    0.625

    26

    0.65

    27

    0.675

    28

    0.7

    29

    0.725

    30

    0.75

    31

    0.775

    32–52

    0.8

    53 or more

    1.0

    Student allowances – paid practical work
    Learners that undertake paid practical work as part of their course of study are not entitled to any student allowance payments for the week(s) they undertake that work. It is important that you discuss this with your learners.
    For more information on student allowance entitlements and paid practical work please see StudyLink.

    MIL OSI New Zealand News –

  • MIL-OSI Security: San Jose AI Solutions Company Agrees To Pay $1.5 Million To Resolve Allegations That It Improperly Obtained Federal Grant Funds

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    SAN FRANCISCO – Vimaan Robotics, Inc. (Vimaan), a San Jose-based company that develops computer vision and AI warehouse management solutions, has agreed to pay $1.5 million to resolve allegations that it violated the False Claims Act by improperly accepting and drawing down funds from a grant award that it was ineligible to receive.  

    The settlement relates to a Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Phase II grant that Vimaan obtained from the National Science Foundation (NSF).  The terms and conditions of the SBIR grant preclude companies that are majority-owned by one or more venture capital operating companies from applying for or receiving such an award.  The settlement resolves allegations by the United States that at the time Vimaan received the award on April 16, 2020, Vimaan failed to disclose that it had become majority-owned by one or more venture capital companies one month earlier, making it ineligible for the award.  Between June 2020 and August 2022, the United States contends, Vimaan submitted 14 separate requests to NSF for disbursement of the award funds and falsely certified its eligibility to receive the award funds in each of these payment requests.

    “Federal small business research grants awarded by NSF are designed to support and foster innovative research by small businesses, not to provide taxpayer funding for businesses primarily owned by venture capital firms,” said Acting United States Attorney Patrick D. Robbins.  “When companies evade program restrictions and obtain grants even though they are not eligible, this office will vigorously enforce the False Claims Act to ensure that federal dollars go to proper recipients.”

    “The SBIR program is a valuable tool in advancing NSF’s mission to promote the progress of science by increasing opportunities for small businesses to undertake cutting-edge scientific research. Entities that misrepresent their eligibility in order to obtain government funding undermine the integrity and effectiveness of the program. The NSF Office of Inspector General is committed to vigorously pursuing oversight of these taxpayer funds and I commend the U.S. Attorney’s Office for its strong support in this effort,” said Megan E. Wallace, NSF’s Acting Inspector General.

    Assistant U.S. Attorney Savith Iyengar handled this matter for the government.  The investigation and settlement resulted from a coordinated effort by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of California and NSF-OIG.  

    The investigation and resolution of this matter illustrate the government’s emphasis on combating fraud in federal grants.  One of the most powerful tools in this effort is the False Claims Act.  Tips and complaints from all sources about potential fraud, waste, abuse, and mismanagement involving NSF can be reported to NSF’s Office of Inspector General at https://oig.nsf.gov/contact/hotline.

    The claims resolved by the settlement are allegations only, and there has been no determination of liability.

    Vimaan Settlement Agreement
     

    MIL Security OSI –

  • MIL-OSI Australia: A slice of history at Buninyong

    Source:

    If a picture paints a thousand words, Buninyong – Mount Helen Fire Brigade’s new mural paints the whole story.

    To kick off the brigade’s community open day late last year, there was an official handover of the Merryweather room, including a mural depicting the story of the brigade’s original historic late 19th century English-built Merryweather fire engine.

    The Merryweather stands proudly in its own dedicated space facing one of the main thoroughfares in town in the brigade’s new purpose-built station in Buninyong. Thanks to financial support from Community Bank Buninyong and inspiration from the Buninyong Historical Society, the mural is displayed behind the Merryweather and ensures that the story of this majestic piece of firefighting equipment lives on.

    The idea for the mural came from a montage of a Buninyong streetscape in the local Community House. After much thought, the brigade decided that this would be a beautiful way to ensure that the story of the Merryweather was brought to life for future generations to enjoy.

    The Merryweather was operated by 26 people. With only 12 brigade members at the time, firefighters often relied on the help of bystanders to assist pumping. The fold-out arms moved in a see-saw motion, manually pumped by a group of people – four on each side in three rotations – to get water running through the hose.

    The Merryweather, which was used from 1882 to the mid-1930s, attended fires pulled by a horse or by firefighters if the horse was unavailable or uncooperative.

    With no hydrants or town water, water supply in Buninyong at the time was not plentiful so keeping the water supply up was a challenge. The brigade relied on wells and dams scattered around the township.

    Sovereign Hill staff contributed to the restoration of this beautiful old fire engine in the 1990s by hand crafting wheel parts.

    Submitted by Irene Keating

    MIL OSI News –

  • MIL-OSI Video: Stuck on this footage…#traveling #funny

    Source: United States of America – Federal Government Departments (video statements)

    Feeling de-feet-ed planning for your summer travel? We’re heel for you:

    You’ll put your best foot forward by arriving at the airport with extra time before your flight. Wear shoes that are easy to remove, avoid clothes with a high metal content, and put heavy jewelry on after you’ve completed screening.

    Don’t let disorganization be your Achilles heel. Have your ID and boarding pass ready, your large electronics and travel-size liquids bag at the top of your carry-on.

    Want to get a leg up on the travel competition? Help is just a hop, skip and a jump away, as our AskTSA team is always ready to answer you travel questions. Converse with them on FB Messenger, TW, and Apple Business Chat, 7 days a week.

    We hope this content was all the info your sole needed.

    Video by @laci_loves_hair

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HDXF-tWHrE0

    MIL OSI Video –

  • MIL-OSI USA: East Trading Inc., Issues Alert on Undeclared Sulfites in “Licorice Plum”

    Source: US Food and Drug Administration

    Summary

    Company Announcement Date:
    May 01, 2025
    FDA Publish Date:
    May 05, 2025
    Product Type:
    Food & BeveragesAllergens
    Reason for Announcement:

    Recall Reason Description
    Potential or Undeclared Allergen – sulfites Unapproved color – Amaranth (E123)

    Company Name:
    Eats CL Trading, Inc.
    Brand Name:

    Brand Name(s)
    President Brand

    Product Description:

    Product Description
    Licorice plum

    Company Announcement
    East CK Trading, Inc. of Long Island City, NY, is recalling its 8-ounce packages of “Licorice Plum” food treats because they contained undeclared sulfites and unallowed color, Amaranth (E123). Consumers who have severe sensitivity to sulfites run the risk of serious or life-threatening allergic reactions if they consume this product
    The recalled “Licorice Plum” were distributed nationwide in retail stores and through mail orders. The product comes in an 8-ounce, clear plastic bottle. The product UPC code is 0077-20729
    No illnesses or allergic reactions involving this product have been reported to date.
    The recall was initiated after routine sampling by New York State Department of Agriculture and Markets Food Inspectors and subsequent analysis by Food Laboratory personnel revealed the presence of sulfites in the 8 ounce packages of “Licorice Plum” which were not declared on the label. The consumption of 10 milligrams of sulfites per serving has been reported to elicit severe reactions in some asthmatics. Anaphylactic shock could occur in certain sulfite sensitive individuals upon ingesting 10 milligrams or more of sulfites. Analysis of the “Licorice Plum” revealed they contained 29.1 milligrams per serving.
    Consumers who have purchased 8-ounce packages of “Licorice Plum” are urged to return them to the place of purchase for a full refund. Consumers with questions may contact the company at 1-718-857-0008

    Company Contact Information

    Consumers:
    Jeff Boehner
    1-718-857-0008

    Product Photos

    Content current as of:
    05/05/2025

    Regulated Product(s)

    Topic(s)

    Follow FDA

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Get ready to book your Great Walk

    Source: Department of Conservation

    Date:  06 May 2025

    “The most-loved experiences during peak times such as the holidays tend to book up quickly, but there’s plenty to choose from across the network,” DOC Heritage and Visitor Director Catherine Wilson says.

    DOC has upgraded its booking system ready for Great Walks 2025/26 bookings, which open from 15 May 2025.

    Catherine Wilson says people booking Great Walks will notice some changes this year.

    “We’ve introduced a new industry-leading lobby system, similar to those used by concert-booking companies, so customers have a smoother experience, and we can better manage the very high demand when bookings first open.”

    Catherine Wilson says opening dates are staggered – ten Great Walks 15 to 28 May, huts campsites and lodges 13 May to 4 June – to give people making multiple bookings a better chance of securing their preferred slot.

    “We’ve re-shuffled the booking schedule* to balance demand across the weeks so the Kepler, Heaphy and Rakiura Great Walks open first on Wednesday 15 May, and the exceptionally popular Milford Track will open last on Wednesday 28 May.

    “While the most popular Great Walks such as Milford and Routeburn book out very fast on the day, there are often cancellations so it’s worth keeping an eye on the booking website. Other experiences, such as Abel Tasman and Heaphy have more capacity and don’t generally book out on opening day.” 

    On opening morning, users logging into their DOC account will be redirected to the lobby and assigned a number. At 9.30 am the queue will start to move steadily into the booking system. 

    “We continue to ask users to be patient when booking. New Zealand’s Great Walks face massive demand with close to 100,000 people booking a Great Walk annually, 35% of whom are international visitors,” says Catherine Wilson.

    “We’re lucky to have stunning mountains, forests, beaches, parks, lakes and rivers on our doorstep, and incredible tracks, huts and campsites for people to enjoy them.” 

    The Great Walks vary in their length, challenge, and the necessary skills and fitness required. Walkers are encouraged to read about the options on DOC’s website and pick the Great Walk best suited to their skills and experience.

    As part of regular price reviews, customers may notice price increases at some facilities next season.

    Price increases range between 5-15% for the Milford, Routeburn, Kepler, Abel Tasman Coast Track, and Paparoa Great Walks and several high-demand huts and cottages. Some of DOC’s standard and serviced campsites have increased by $3-$5 per person per night.

    User charges contribute to the running costs of DOC’s recreation network, Catherine Wilson says.

    “User fees are an increasingly important tool for improving the financial sustainability of the visitor network.

    “New Zealand has a huge variety of DOC facilities with price points for all budgets. Just make sure you book huts, campsites, and cottages early to secure popular dates and times,” says Catherine Wilson.

    For information on DOC’s pricing changes and to book, visit DOC huts, campsites and cottages.

    Bookings for Tongariro Northern Circuit are on hold while DOC assesses plans for replacing Oturere Hut.

    To book the Hump Ridge Track visit . Bookings can be made anytime. The Hump Ridge Track’s walking season is 25 October 2024 to 21 April 2025.

    Contact

    For media enquiries contact:

    Email: media@doc.govt.nz

    MIL OSI New Zealand News –

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: 2024 General Insurance Stress Test results published

    Source: Reserve Bank of New Zealand

    The 2024 General Insurance Stress Test (GIIST) bulletin published today noted insurers’ resilience in managing claims from an extreme seismic event. It also highlighted the need for a coordinated response across the industry and government to manage such shocks and ensure ongoing insurance availability.

    MIL OSI New Zealand News –

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Banking – ASB recruiting 80 home ownership specialists to prepare for refixing surge

    Source: ASB

    ASB is on a hiring drive to recruit 80 additional home ownership specialists as it prepares for a surge in home loan applications. 80 percent of New Zealand homeowners are expected to refix their home loan within the next year, according to the Reserve Bank of New Zealand. While most of the 80 full time specialists have now been recruited, there are still some roles being advertised. The specialists will work across the bank’s in-house home ownership team and mortgage adviser-led business.

    With many Kiwi having locked in short-term rates when interest rates were higher, Adam Boyd, Executive General Manager of Personal Banking says ASB is already seeing a change in customer behaviour, with people starting to fix for longer terms. “As a result of falling rates, we expect 55 percent of our home loan customers will have locked in rates under 6 percent by December this year, compared to 40 percent in March 2025.”

    ASB is also simplifying its refinance process so that Kiwi coming to the end of their fixed rate term at another bank can receive a decision on moving to an ASB loan quicker and more easily. For its mortgage adviser-led business, ASB has introduced a system to improve the quality of applications being submitted so they can be processed more quickly.  

    ASB was named Canstar’s 2025 Bank of the Year – Home Loans Award winner. The award recognised that ASB delivers mortgage products that combine ‘the best features with the lowest costs, plus provides great customer service at every stage of the mortgage journey’. ASB also won Canstar’s Outstanding Value Awards in four categories – Home Lender, Investment Home Lender, Fixed Home Lender, and Investment Fixed Home Lender.

    “We are seeing elevated demand for our home loans. By growing our teams and enhancing our refinance process, we’ll be able to turn around applications faster, both for our customers and the mortgage advisers we work with, while continuing to deliver great service,” says Boyd.

    “We continue to offer competitive pricing, having dropped fixed rate mortgages six times this year. Our one-year fixed term rate is currently joint market leading, at 4.99 percent.”

    MIL OSI New Zealand News –

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Business and Tech – Fusion5 repositions itself in market as transformation partner

    Source: FUSION5

    6 May – Auckland, New Zealand – Following several significant senior appointments and acquisitions of related technology businesses over the past 18 months, Australasian systems integrator Fusion5 has formally announced its transition from a business applications company to a full-service transformation partner.
    Formed in 2003, Fusion5 initially filled the gap between the big, strategically focused IT consulting firms and smaller, hands-on, agile applications software specialists. From a running start as a highly awarded digital partner to world-leading business application providers (including CRM, ERP, and HR) across Microsoft, Oracle, Workday and IBM, the company went on to add advanced technical and integration capabilities.
    “To keep pace with the intensifying complexity of IT ecosystems, Fusion5 acquired complementary ‘best-in-class’ IT practices to expand our in-house digital capability,” says Sven Martin, CEO – Fusion5 Australia. “In particular, bringing IntegrationWorks into the fold in 2024 introduced significant skills, expertise, and referenceability – deepening our proficiency in systems integration.”
    The company has also invested heavily in its culture and capability; adding strategic services such as consulting and advisory, a robust client-success program and managed services to ensure clients access the governance and innovation necessary for success.
    However, despite providing its customers with a seamless approach to digital transformation, recent customer research identified a perception gap.
    “Our evolution had out-paced market understanding,” says Martin. “Fusion5 goes beyond the role of typical systems integrators, IT consultants, business solutions implementors, or even managed services providers – to stitch all of that digital capability (and more) together as a cross-functional transformation partner. This convergence of solutions, services, and capabilities enables us to utilise AI as a strategic lever for transformation.
    “We now offer our customers one-partner simplicity and the benefit of a Trans-Tasman team that’s geared up, both strategically and practically. In short, we can help our customers ‘go beyond’ what they ever expected to achieve with technology alone.”
    Kristy Brown, CEO – Fusion5 New Zealand, adds: “Today’s CIO grapples with the ongoing tension of harnessing digital innovation while ensuring measurable IT performance. In other words – keeping the lights on while lighting up innovation. They must champion digital agility and prepare the business to leverage new technologies while optimising existing ones. Fusion5 offers a unique blend of business acumen and digital capability to bridge the vision-to-performance gap many business leaders face.”
    To mark its evolution, Fusion5 has undertaken a major brand overhaul to better realign market perception and reflect its ‘go beyond’ transformation partner status.

    MIL OSI New Zealand News –

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: NHRC, India takes suo motu cognizance of the reported death of three workers and injuries to three others in an explosion at a propellant mixing unit of an explosives manufacturing plant in Yadadri Bhongir district of Telangana

    Source: Government of India

    NHRC, India takes suo motu cognizance of the reported death of three workers and injuries to three others in an explosion at a propellant mixing unit of an explosives manufacturing plant in Yadadri Bhongir district of Telangana

    Issues notices to the Chief Secretary and DGP, Telangana, calling for a detailed report within two weeks

    Posted On: 05 MAY 2025 6:03PM by PIB Delhi

    The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), India has taken suo motu cognizance of a media report that three workers died and three others were injured in an explosion that occurred at a propellant mixing unit of an explosives manufacturing plant at Katepalli village in Yadadri Bhongir district of Telangana. Reportedly, the incident happened on 29th April, 2025.

    The Commission has observed that the contents of the news report, if true, raise serious issues of violation of the human rights of the victims. Therefore, it has issued notices to the Chief Secretary, Government of Telangana and the Director General of Police, Telangana, calling for a detailed report in the matter within two weeks. The report is expected to include the health status of the injured persons.

    According to the media report, carried on 29th April, 2025, the explosion caused the complete collapse of the mixing unit structure of the plant. Reportedly, the company has been manufacturing explosives for both commercial and leading organisations, including DRDO.

    ***

    NSK

     

    (Release ID: 2127107) Visitor Counter : 21

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News –