Commerce – Page 255 – NewzIntel.com

MIL-OSI: Wintrust Financial Corporation Reports Record First Quarter 2025 Net Income

Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

ROSEMONT, Ill., April 21, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Wintrust Financial Corporation (“Wintrust”, “the Company”, “we” or “our”) (Nasdaq: WTFC) announced record quarterly net income of $189.0 million, or $2.69 per diluted common share, for the first quarter of 2025, compared to net income of $185.4 million, or $2.63 per diluted common share in the fourth quarter of 2024. Pre-tax, pre-provision income (non-GAAP) totaled a record $277.0 million, compared to $270.1 million for the fourth quarter of 2024.

Timothy S. Crane, President and Chief Executive Officer, commented, “Building on our record results in 2024, we are pleased with our strong start to the year. Our balanced business model supported disciplined loan growth, which was funded by robust deposit growth in the first quarter of 2025.”

Additionally, Mr. Crane noted, “Net interest margin in the first quarter increased by five basis points to 3.56% compared to the fourth quarter of 2024. The improvement in net interest margin was primarily attributed to decreased funding costs. The higher net interest margin and balance sheet growth supported record net interest income levels in the first quarter of 2025.”

Highlights of the first quarter of 2025:
Comparative information to the fourth quarter of 2024, unless otherwise noted

Total loans increased by $653 million, or 6% annualized.
Total deposits increased by approximately $1.1 billion, or 8% annualized.
Total assets increased by $1.0 billion, or 6% annualized.
Net interest income increased to $526.5 million in the first quarter of 2025, compared to $525.1 million in the fourth quarter of 2024, supported by improvement in net interest margin and balance sheet growth.
- Net interest margin increased to 3.54% (3.56% on a fully taxable-equivalent basis, non-GAAP) during the first quarter of 2025.
Non-interest income and non-interest expense were relatively stable in the first quarter of 2025. Notable impacts were:
- Net gains on investment securities totaled $3.2 million.
- Macatawa Bank acquisition-related costs were $2.7 million.
Provision for credit losses totaled $24.0 million in the first quarter of 2025, as compared to a provision for credit losses of $17.0 million in the fourth quarter of 2024.
Net charge-offs totaled $12.6 million, or 11 basis points of average total loans on an annualized basis, in the first quarter of 2025 compared to $15.9 million, or 13 basis points of average total loans on an annualized basis, in the fourth quarter of 2024.

Mr. Crane noted, “The Company exhibited disciplined and consistent loan growth, as loans increased by $653 million compared to the prior quarter, or 6% on an annualized basis. Loan pipelines are strong and we remain prudent in our review of credit opportunities, ensuring our loan growth adheres to our conservative credit standards. Strong deposit growth of $1.1 billion, or 8% on an annualized basis, in the first quarter of 2025 outpaced loan growth, which resulted in our loans-to-deposits ratio ending the quarter at 90.9%. Non-interest bearing deposits totaled $11.2 billion and comprised 21% of total deposits at the end of the first quarter of 2025. We continue to leverage our enviable market positioning to generate deposits, grow loans and expand our franchise value.”

Commenting on credit quality, Mr. Crane stated, “Prudent credit management, involving in-depth reviews of the portfolio, has led to positive outcomes by proactively identifying and resolving problem credits in a timely fashion. We continue to be conservative, diversified, and maintain our consistently strong credit standards. We believe the Company’s reserves are appropriate and we remain committed to maintaining credit quality as evidenced by our improved net charge-offs, stable levels of non-performing loans and our core loan allowance for credit losses of 1.37%.”

In summary, Mr. Crane concluded, “Overall, we are proud of our first quarter results and believe we are well-positioned to continue our strong momentum as we navigate the macroeconomic uncertainty in 2025. The first quarter results highlighted the quality of our core deposit franchise and multifaceted nature of our business model, which uniquely positions us to be successful. Anticipated solid loan growth in the second quarter, combined with a stable net interest margin should result in higher levels of net interest income in the second quarter of 2025. Increasing our long-term franchise value and net interest income, coupled with disciplined expense control and maintaining our conservative credit standards, remain our focus in 2025.”

The graphs shown on pages 3-7 illustrate certain financial highlights of the first quarter of 2025 as well as historical financial performance. See “Supplemental Non-GAAP Financial Measures/Ratios” at Table 17 for additional information with respect to non-GAAP financial measures/ratios, including the reconciliations to the corresponding GAAP financial measures/ratios.

Graphs available at the following link: http://ml.globenewswire.com/Resource/Download/cdbdc506-1b5a-4776-ae2e-e0b14106e712

SUMMARY OF RESULTS:

BALANCE SHEET

Total assets increased $1.0 billion in the first quarter of 2025 as compared to the fourth quarter of 2024. Total loans increased by $653.4 million as compared to the fourth quarter of 2024. The increase in loans was primarily driven by growth in the commercial and premium finance life insurance loan portfolios.

Total liabilities increased by $734.2 million in the first quarter of 2025 as compared to the fourth quarter of 2024, driven by a $1.1 billion increase in total deposits. Robust organic deposit growth in the first quarter of 2025 was driven by our diverse deposit product offerings. Non-interest bearing deposits as a percentage of total deposits were 21% at March 31, 2025, relatively stable compared to recent quarters. The Company’s loans-to-deposits ratio ended the quarter at 90.9%.

For more information regarding changes in the Company’s balance sheet, see Consolidated Statements of Condition and Table 1 through Table 3 in this report.

NET INTEREST INCOME

For the first quarter of 2025, net interest income totaled $526.5 million, an increase of $1.3 million as compared to the fourth quarter of 2024, primarily due to improvement in net interest margin and growth in the balance sheet, partially offset by two fewer calendar days in the quarter.

Net interest margin increased to 3.54% (3.56% on a fully taxable-equivalent basis, non-GAAP) during the first quarter of 2025, up five basis points compared to the fourth quarter of 2024. The yield on earning assets declined 11 basis points during the first quarter of 2025 primarily due to a 15 basis point decrease in loan yields. The net free funds contribution declined six basis points compared to the fourth quarter of 2024. These declines were more than offset by a 22 basis point reduction in funding cost, primarily due to a 23 basis point decline in the rate paid on interest-bearing deposits, compared to the fourth quarter of 2024.

For more information regarding net interest income, see Table 4 through Table 7 in this report.

ASSET QUALITY

The allowance for credit losses totaled $448.4 million as of March 31, 2025, an increase from $437.1 million as of December 31, 2024. A provision for credit losses totaling $24.0 million was recorded for the first quarter of 2025 as compared to $17.0 million recorded in the fourth quarter of 2024. The higher provision for credit losses recognized in the first quarter of 2025 is primarily attributable to impacts related to the macroeconomic outlook. Future economic performance remains uncertain, thus downside risks to the baseline scenario, including widening credit spreads and lower valuations in financial markets, were considered to derive a qualitative addition to the provision for the first quarter of 2025. For more information regarding the allowance for credit losses and provision for credit losses, see Table 10 in this report.

Management believes the allowance for credit losses is appropriate to account for expected credit losses. The Company is required to estimate expected credit losses over the life of the Company’s financial assets as of the reporting date. There can be no assurances, however, that future losses will not significantly exceed the amounts provided for, thereby affecting future results of operations. A summary of the allowance for credit losses calculated for the loan components in each portfolio as of March 31, 2025, December 31, 2024, and September 30, 2024 is shown on Table 11 of this report.

Net charge-offs totaled $12.6 million in the first quarter of 2025, a decrease of $3.3 million as compared to $15.9 million of net charge-offs in the fourth quarter of 2024. Net charge-offs as a percentage of average total loans were 11 basis points in the first quarter of 2025 on an annualized basis, compared to 13 basis points on an annualized basis in the fourth quarter of 2024. For more information regarding net charge-offs, see Table 9 in this report.

The Company’s delinquency rates remain low and manageable. For more information regarding past due loans, see Table 12 in this report.

Non-performing assets and non-performing loans have remained relatively stable compared to prior quarters. Non-performing assets totaled $195.0 million and comprised 0.30% of total assets as of March 31, 2025, as compared to $193.9 million, or 0.30% of total assets, as of December 31, 2024. Non-performing loans totaled $172.4 million and comprised 0.35% of total loans at March 31, 2025, as compared to $170.8 million and 0.36% of total loans at December 31, 2024. For more information regarding non-performing assets, see Table 13 in this report.

NON-INTEREST INCOME

Non-interest income totaled $116.6 million in the first quarter of 2025, increasing $3.2 million, as compared to $113.5 million in the fourth quarter of 2024.

Wealth management revenue decreased by $4.7 million in the first quarter of 2025, as compared to the fourth quarter of 2024. Revenue in the first quarter of 2025 was impacted by the transition of systems and support for brokerage and certain private client business to a new third party in the current quarter, as well as lower assets under management due to lower market valuations. The reduction in revenue was driven by anticipated slowdown in activity from the transition, market conditions, and certain offsets to expenses. Wealth management revenue is comprised of the trust and asset management revenue of Wintrust Private Trust Company and Great Lakes Advisors, the brokerage commissions, managed money fees and insurance product commissions at Wintrust Investments and fees from tax-deferred like-kind exchange services provided by the Chicago Deferred Exchange Company.

Mortgage banking revenue totaling $20.5 million in the first quarter of 2025 was essentially unchanged compared to the fourth quarter of 2024. For more information regarding mortgage banking revenue, see Table 15 in this report.

The Company recognized $19.4 million in service charges on deposit accounts in the first quarter of 2025, as compared to $18.9 million in the fourth quarter of 2024. The $0.5 million increase in the first quarter of 2025 was primarily due to increased commercial account fees.

The Company recognized $3.2 million in net gains on investment securities in the first quarter of 2025 as compared to $2.8 million in net losses in the fourth quarter of 2024. The net gains in the first quarter of 2025 were primarily the result of unrealized gains on the Company’s equity investment securities with a readily determinable fair value.

For more information regarding non-interest income, see Table 14 in this report.

NON-INTEREST EXPENSE

Non-interest expenses totaled $366.1 million in the first quarter of 2025, decreasing $2.4 million as compared to $368.5 million in the fourth quarter of 2024.

Salaries and employee benefits expense decreased by $0.6 million in the first quarter of 2025 as compared to the fourth quarter of 2024. This was primarily driven by decreased commissions and incentives compensation expense related to lower mortgage originations and wealth management revenue in the quarter partially offset by higher salaries expense which can be attributed to annual merit increases taking effect in the first quarter of the year.

Advertising and marketing expenses in the first quarter of 2025 totaled $12.3 million, which was a $0.8 million decrease as compared to the fourth quarter of 2024. The reduction in the first quarter is primarily due to timing of marketing campaigns, sponsorship arrangements and other investments.

Professional fees expense totaled $9.0 million in the first quarter of 2025, resulting in a decrease of $2.3 million as compared to the fourth quarter of 2024. The decrease in the current quarter relates primarily to decreased fees on consulting services. Professional fees include legal, audit, and tax fees, external loan review costs, consulting arrangements and normal regulatory exam assessments.

Travel and entertainment expense totaled $5.3 million in the first quarter of 2025 which decreased $2.9 million as compared to the fourth quarter of 2024. The decrease is primarily due to seasonal corporate events that occur during the fourth quarter.

The Macatawa Bank acquisition related costs were $2.7 million in the first quarter of 2025, primarily driven by consulting expenses, employee retention and severance costs, and contracted resource costs.

For more information regarding non-interest expense, see Table 16 in this report.

INCOME TAXES

The Company recorded income tax expense of $64.0 million in the first quarter compared to $67.7 million in the fourth quarter of 2024. The effective tax rates were 25.30% in the first quarter of 2025 compared to 26.76% in the fourth quarter of 2024. The effective tax rates were partially impacted by the tax effects related to share-based compensation, which fluctuate based on the Company’s stock price and timing of employee stock option exercises and vesting of other share-based awards. The Company recorded net excess tax benefits of $3.7 million in the first quarter of 2025, compared to excess tax benefits of $50,000 in the fourth quarter of 2024 related to share-based compensation.

BUSINESS SUMMARY

Community Banking

Through community banking, the Company provides banking and financial services primarily to individuals, small to mid-sized businesses, local governmental units and institutional clients residing primarily in the local areas the Company services. In the first quarter of 2025, community banking increased its commercial, commercial real estate and residential real estate loan portfolios.

Mortgage banking revenue was $20.5 million for both the first quarter of 2025, and the fourth quarter of 2024. See Table 15 for more detail. Service charges on deposit accounts totaled $19.4 million in the first quarter of 2025 as compared to $18.9 million in the fourth quarter of 2024. The Company’s gross commercial and commercial real estate loan pipelines remained solid as of March 31, 2025 indicating momentum for expected continued loan growth in the second quarter of 2025.

Specialty Finance

Through specialty finance, the Company offers financing of insurance premiums for businesses and individuals, equipment financing through structured loans and lease products to customers in a variety of industries, accounts receivable financing and value-added, out-sourced administrative services and other services. Originations within the insurance premium financing receivables portfolios were $4.8 billion during the first quarter of 2025. Average balances increased by $213.4 million, as compared to the fourth quarter of 2024. The Company’s leasing divisions’ portfolio balances increased in the first quarter of 2025, with capital leases, loans, and equipment on operating leases of $2.7 billion, $1.1 billion, and $280.5 million as of March 31, 2025 respectively, as compared to $2.5 billion, $1.1 billion, and $278.3 million as of December 31, 2024, respectively. Revenues from the Company’s out-sourced administrative services business were $1.4 million in the first quarter of 2025, which was relatively stable compared to the fourth quarter of 2024.

Wealth Management

Through wealth management, the Company offers a full range of wealth management services, including trust and investment services, tax-deferred like-kind exchange services, asset management, and securities brokerage services. See “Items Impacting Comparative Results,” regarding the sale of the Company’s Retirement Benefits Advisors (“RBA”) division during the first quarter of 2024. Wealth management revenue totaled $34.0 million in the first quarter of 2025, down slightly as compared to the fourth quarter of 2024. At March 31, 2025, the Company’s wealth management subsidiaries had approximately $51.1 billion of assets under administration, which included $8.4 billion of assets owned by the Company and its subsidiary banks.

ITEMS IMPACTING COMPARATIVE FINANCIAL RESULTS

Business Combination

On August 1, 2024, the Company completed its previously announced acquisition of Macatawa, the parent company of Macatawa Bank. In conjunction with the completed acquisition, the Company issued approximately 4.7 million shares of common stock. Macatawa operates 26 full-service branches located throughout communities in Kent, Ottawa and northern Allegan counties in the state of Michigan. Macatawa offers a full range of banking, retail and commercial lending, wealth management and ecommerce services to individuals, businesses and governmental entities. As of August 1, 2024, Macatawa had fair values of approximately $2.9 billion in assets, $2.3 billion in deposits and $1.3 billion in loans. As of March 31, 2025, the Company recorded goodwill of approximately $142.1 million on the purchase.

Division Sale

In the first quarter of 2024, the Company sold its RBA division and recorded a net gain of approximately $19.3 million ($20.0 million in other non-interest income from the sale, offset by $0.7 million in commissions/incentive compensation expense).

WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION
Key Operating Measures

Wintrust’s key operating measures and growth rates for the first quarter of 2025, as compared to the fourth quarter of 2024 (sequential quarter) and first quarter of 2024 (linked quarter), are shown in the table below:

										% or ⁽¹⁾basis point (bp) change from 4th Quarter 2024			% or basis point (bp) change from 1st Quarter 2024
	Three Months Ended
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)	Mar 31, 2025			Dec 31, 2024			Mar 31, 2024
Net income	$	189,039		$	185,362		$	187,294		2		%	1		%
Pre-tax income, excluding provision for credit losses (non-GAAP) ⁽²⁾		277,018			270,060			271,629		3			2
Net income per common share – Diluted		2.69			2.63			2.89		2			(7	)
Cash dividends declared per common share		0.50			0.45			0.45		11			11
Net revenue ⁽³⁾		643,108			638,599			604,774		1			6
Net interest income		526,474			525,148			464,194		0			13
Net interest margin		3.54	%		3.49	%		3.57	%	5		bps	(3	)	bps
Net interest margin – fully taxable-equivalent (non-GAAP) ⁽²⁾		3.56			3.51			3.59		5			(3	)
Net overhead ratio ⁽⁴⁾		1.58			1.60			1.39		(2	)		19
Return on average assets		1.20			1.16			1.35		4			(15	)
Return on average common equity		12.21			11.82			14.42		39			(221	)
Return on average tangible common equity (non-GAAP) ⁽²⁾		14.72			14.29			16.75		43			(203	)
At end of period
Total assets	$	65,870,066		$	64,879,668		$	57,576,933		6		%	14		%
Total loans ⁽⁵⁾		48,708,390			48,055,037			43,230,706		6			13
Total deposits		53,570,038			52,512,349			46,448,858		8			15
Total shareholders’ equity		6,600,537			6,344,297			5,436,400		16			21

^{(1)   Period-end balance sheet percentage changes are annualized.
(2)   See Table 17: Supplemental Non-GAAP Financial Measures/Ratios for additional information on this performance measure/ratio.
(3)   Net revenue is net interest income plus non-interest income.
(4)   The net overhead ratio is calculated by netting total non-interest expense and total non-interest income, annualizing this amount, and dividing by that period’s average total assets. A lower ratio indicates a higher degree of efficiency.
(5)   Excludes mortgage loans held-for-sale.}

Certain returns, yields, performance ratios, or quarterly growth rates are “annualized” in this presentation to represent an annual time period. This is done for analytical purposes to better discern, for decision-making purposes, underlying performance trends when compared to full-year or year-over-year amounts. For example, a 5% growth rate for a quarter would represent an annualized 20% growth rate. Additional supplemental financial information showing quarterly trends can be found on the Company’s website at www.wintrust.com by choosing “Financial Reports” under the “Investor Relations” heading, and then choosing “Financial Highlights.”

WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION
Selected Financial Highlights

	Three Months Ended
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)	Mar 31, 2025			Dec 31, 2024			Sep 30, 2024			Jun 30, 2024			Mar 31, 2024
Selected Financial Condition Data (at end of period):
Total assets	$	65,870,066		$	64,879,668		$	63,788,424		$	59,781,516		$	57,576,933
Total loans ⁽¹⁾		48,708,390			48,055,037			47,067,447			44,675,531			43,230,706
Total deposits		53,570,038			52,512,349			51,404,966			48,049,026			46,448,858
Total shareholders’ equity		6,600,537			6,344,297			6,399,714			5,536,628			5,436,400
Selected Statements of Income Data:
Net interest income	$	526,474		$	525,148		$	502,583		$	470,610		$	464,194
Net revenue ⁽²⁾		643,108			638,599			615,730			591,757			604,774
Net income		189,039			185,362			170,001			152,388			187,294
Pre-tax income, excluding provision for credit losses (non-GAAP) ⁽³⁾		277,018			270,060			255,043			251,404			271,629
Net income per common share – Basic		2.73			2.68			2.51			2.35			2.93
Net income per common share – Diluted		2.69			2.63			2.47			2.32			2.89
Cash dividends declared per common share		0.50			0.45			0.45			0.45			0.45
Selected Financial Ratios and Other Data:
Performance Ratios:
Net interest margin		3.54	%		3.49	%		3.49	%		3.50	%		3.57	%
Net interest margin – fully taxable-equivalent (non-GAAP) ⁽³⁾		3.56			3.51			3.51			3.52			3.59
Non-interest income to average assets		0.74			0.71			0.74			0.85			1.02
Non-interest expense to average assets		2.32			2.31			2.36			2.38			2.41
Net overhead ratio ⁽⁴⁾		1.58			1.60			1.62			1.53			1.39
Return on average assets		1.20			1.16			1.11			1.07			1.35
Return on average common equity		12.21			11.82			11.63			11.61			14.42
Return on average tangible common equity (non-GAAP) ⁽³⁾		14.72			14.29			13.92			13.49			16.75
Average total assets	$	64,107,042		$	63,594,105		$	60,915,283		$	57,493,184		$	55,602,695
Average total shareholders’ equity		6,460,941			6,418,403			5,990,429			5,450,173			5,440,457
Average loans to average deposits ratio		92.3	%		91.9	%		93.8	%		95.1	%		94.5	%
Period-end loans to deposits ratio		90.9			91.5			91.6			93.0			93.1
Common Share Data at end of period:
Market price per common share	$	112.46		$	124.71		$	108.53		$	98.56		$	104.39
Book value per common share		92.47			89.21			90.06			82.97			81.38
Tangible book value per common share (non-GAAP) ⁽³⁾		78.83			75.39			76.15			72.01			70.40
Common shares outstanding		66,919,325			66,495,227			66,481,543			61,760,139			61,736,715
Other Data at end of period:
Common equity to assets ratio		9.4	%		9.1	%		9.4	%		8.6	%		8.7	%
Tangible common equity ratio (non-GAAP) ⁽³⁾		8.1			7.8			8.1			7.5			7.6
Tier 1 leverage ratio ⁽⁵⁾		9.6			9.4			9.6			9.3			9.4
Risk-based capital ratios:
Tier 1 capital ratio ⁽⁵⁾		10.8			10.7			10.6			10.3			10.3
Common equity tier 1 capital ratio ⁽⁵⁾		10.1			9.9			9.8			9.5			9.5
Total capital ratio ⁽⁵⁾		12.5			12.3			12.2			12.1			12.2
Allowance for credit losses ⁽⁶⁾	$	448,387		$	437,060		$	436,193		$	437,560		$	427,504
Allowance for loan and unfunded lending-related commitment losses to total loans		0.92	%		0.91	%		0.93	%		0.98	%		0.99	%
Number of:
Bank subsidiaries		16			16			16			15			15
Banking offices		208			205			203			177			176

^{(1)   Excludes mortgage loans held-for-sale.}
^{(2)   Net revenue is net interest income plus non-interest income.}
^{(3)   See Table 17: Supplemental Non-GAAP Financial Measures/Ratios for additional information on this performance measure/ratio.}
^{(4)   The net overhead ratio is calculated by netting total non-interest expense and total non-interest income, annualizing this amount, and dividing by that period’s average total assets. A lower ratio indicates a higher degree of efficiency.}
^{(5)   Capital ratios for current quarter-end are estimated.}
^{(6)   The allowance for credit losses includes the allowance for loan losses, the allowance for unfunded lending-related commitments and the allowance for held-to-maturity securities losses.}

WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CONDITION

	(Unaudited)						(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)
	Mar 31,			Dec 31,			Sep 30,			Jun 30,			Mar 31,
(In thousands)		2025			2024			2024			2024			2024
Assets
Cash and due from banks	$	616,216		$	452,017		$	725,465		$	415,462		$	379,825
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements		63			6,519			5,663			62			61
Interest-bearing deposits with banks		4,238,237			4,409,753			3,648,117			2,824,314			2,131,077
Available-for-sale securities, at fair value		4,220,305			4,141,482			3,912,232			4,329,957			4,387,598
Held-to-maturity securities, at amortized cost		3,564,490			3,613,263			3,677,420			3,755,924			3,810,015
Trading account securities		—			4,072			3,472			4,134			2,184
Equity securities with readily determinable fair value		270,442			215,412			125,310			112,173			119,777
Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank stock		281,893			281,407			266,908			256,495			224,657
Brokerage customer receivables		—			18,102			16,662			13,682			13,382
Mortgage loans held-for-sale, at fair value		316,804			331,261			461,067			411,851			339,884
Loans, net of unearned income		48,708,390			48,055,037			47,067,447			44,675,531			43,230,706
Allowance for loan losses		(378,207	)		(364,017	)		(360,279	)		(363,719	)		(348,612	)
Net loans		48,330,183			47,691,020			46,707,168			44,311,812			42,882,094
Premises, software and equipment, net		776,679			779,130			772,002			722,295			744,769
Lease investments, net		280,472			278,264			270,171			275,459			283,557
Accrued interest receivable and other assets		1,598,255			1,739,334			1,721,090			1,671,334			1,580,142
Trade date securities receivable		463,023			—			551,031			—			—
Goodwill		796,932			796,942			800,780			655,955			656,181
Other acquisition-related intangible assets		116,072			121,690			123,866			20,607			21,730
Total assets	$	65,870,066		$	64,879,668		$	63,788,424		$	59,781,516		$	57,576,933
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Deposits:
Non-interest-bearing	$	11,201,859		$	11,410,018		$	10,739,132		$	10,031,440		$	9,908,183
Interest-bearing		42,368,179			41,102,331			40,665,834			38,017,586			36,540,675
Total deposits		53,570,038			52,512,349			51,404,966			48,049,026			46,448,858
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		3,151,309			3,151,309			3,171,309			3,176,309			2,676,751
Other borrowings		529,269			534,803			647,043			606,579			575,408
Subordinated notes		298,360			298,283			298,188			298,113			437,965
Junior subordinated debentures		253,566			253,566			253,566			253,566			253,566
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities		1,466,987			1,785,061			1,613,638			1,861,295			1,747,985
Total liabilities		59,269,529			58,535,371			57,388,710			54,244,888			52,140,533
Shareholders’ Equity:
Preferred stock		412,500			412,500			412,500			412,500			412,500
Common stock		67,007			66,560			66,546			61,825			61,798
Surplus		2,494,347			2,482,561			2,470,228			1,964,645			1,954,532
Treasury stock		(9,156	)		(6,153	)		(6,098	)		(5,760	)		(5,757	)
Retained earnings		4,045,854			3,897,164			3,748,715			3,615,616			3,498,475
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(410,015	)		(508,335	)		(292,177	)		(512,198	)		(485,148	)
Total shareholders’ equity		6,600,537			6,344,297			6,399,714			5,536,628			5,436,400
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	65,870,066		$	64,879,668		$	63,788,424		$	59,781,516		$	57,576,933

WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (UNAUDITED)

	Three Months Ended
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)	Mar 31, 2025			Dec 31, 2024			Sep 30, 2024			Jun 30, 2024			Mar 31, 2024
Interest income
Interest and fees on loans	$	768,362		$	789,038		$	794,163		$	749,812		$	710,341
Mortgage loans held-for-sale		4,246			5,623			6,233			5,434			4,146
Interest-bearing deposits with banks		36,766			46,256			32,608			19,731			16,658
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements		179			53			277			17			19
Investment securities		72,016			67,066			69,592			69,779			69,678
Trading account securities		11			6			11			13			18
Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank stock		5,307			5,157			5,451			4,974			4,478
Brokerage customer receivables		78			302			269			219			175
Total interest income		886,965			913,501			908,604			849,979			805,513
Interest expense
Interest on deposits		320,233			346,388			362,019			335,703			299,532
Interest on Federal Home Loan Bank advances		25,441			26,050			26,254			24,797			22,048
Interest on other borrowings		6,792			7,519			9,013			8,700			9,248
Interest on subordinated notes		3,714			3,733			3,712			5,185			5,487
Interest on junior subordinated debentures		4,311			4,663			5,023			4,984			5,004
Total interest expense		360,491			388,353			406,021			379,369			341,319
Net interest income		526,474			525,148			502,583			470,610			464,194
Provision for credit losses		23,963			16,979			22,334			40,061			21,673
Net interest income after provision for credit losses		502,511			508,169			480,249			430,549			442,521
Non-interest income
Wealth management		34,042			38,775			37,224			35,413			34,815
Mortgage banking		20,529			20,452			15,974			29,124			27,663
Service charges on deposit accounts		19,362			18,864			16,430			15,546			14,811
Gains (losses) on investment securities, net		3,196			(2,835	)		3,189			(4,282	)		1,326
Fees from covered call options		3,446			2,305			988			2,056			4,847
Trading (losses) gains, net		(64	)		(113	)		(130	)		70			677
Operating lease income, net		15,287			15,327			15,335			13,938			14,110
Other		20,836			20,676			24,137			29,282			42,331
Total non-interest income		116,634			113,451			113,147			121,147			140,580
Non-interest expense
Salaries and employee benefits		211,526			212,133			211,261			198,541			195,173
Software and equipment		34,717			34,258			31,574			29,231			27,731
Operating lease equipment		10,471			10,263			10,518			10,834			10,683
Occupancy, net		20,778			20,597			19,945			19,585			19,086
Data processing		11,274			10,957			9,984			9,503			9,292
Advertising and marketing		12,272			13,097			18,239			17,436			13,040
Professional fees		9,044			11,334			9,783			9,967			9,553
Amortization of other acquisition-related intangible assets		5,618			5,773			4,042			1,122			1,158
FDIC insurance		10,926			10,640			10,512			10,429			14,537
OREO expenses, net		643			397			(938	)		(259	)		392
Other		38,821			39,090			35,767			33,964			32,500
Total non-interest expense		366,090			368,539			360,687			340,353			333,145
Income before taxes		253,055			253,081			232,709			211,343			249,956
Income tax expense		64,016			67,719			62,708			58,955			62,662
Net income	$	189,039		$	185,362		$	170,001		$	152,388		$	187,294
Preferred stock dividends		6,991			6,991			6,991			6,991			6,991
Net income applicable to common shares	$	182,048		$	178,371		$	163,010		$	145,397		$	180,303
Net income per common share – Basic	$	2.73		$	2.68		$	2.51		$	2.35		$	2.93
Net income per common share – Diluted	$	2.69		$	2.63		$	2.47		$	2.32		$	2.89
Cash dividends declared per common share	$	0.50		$	0.45		$	0.45		$	0.45		$	0.45
Weighted average common shares outstanding		66,726			66,491			64,888			61,839			61,481
Dilutive potential common shares		923			1,233			1,053			926			928
Average common shares and dilutive common shares		67,649			67,724			65,941			62,765			62,409

TABLE 1: LOAN PORTFOLIO MIX AND GROWTH RATES

											% Growth From
(Dollars in thousands)	Mar 31, 2025		Dec 31, 2024		Sep 30, 2024		Jun 30, 2024		Mar 31, 2024		Dec 31, 2024 ⁽¹⁾		Mar 31, 2024
Balance:
Mortgage loans held-for-sale, excluding early buy-out exercised loans guaranteed by U.S. government agencies	$	181,580	$	189,774	$	314,693	$	281,103	$	193,064	(18	)%	(6	)%
Mortgage loans held-for-sale, early buy-out exercised loans guaranteed by U.S. government agencies		135,224		141,487		146,374		130,748		146,820	(18	)	(8	)
Total mortgage loans held-for-sale	$	316,804	$	331,261	$	461,067	$	411,851	$	339,884	(18	)%	(7	)%

Core loans:
Commercial
Commercial and industrial	$	6,871,206	$	6,867,422	$	6,774,683	$	6,236,290	$	6,117,004	0	%	12	%
Asset-based lending		1,701,962		1,611,001		1,709,685		1,465,867		1,355,255	23		26
Municipal		798,646		826,653		827,125		747,357		721,526	(14	)	11
Leases		2,680,943		2,537,325		2,443,721		2,439,128		2,344,295	23		14
Commercial real estate
Residential construction		55,849		48,617		73,088		55,019		57,558	60		(3	)
Commercial construction		2,086,797		2,065,775		1,984,240		1,866,701		1,748,607	4		19
Land		306,235		319,689		346,362		338,831		344,149	(17	)	(11	)
Office		1,641,555		1,656,109		1,675,286		1,585,312		1,566,748	(4	)	5
Industrial		2,677,555		2,628,576		2,527,932		2,307,455		2,190,200	8		22
Retail		1,402,837		1,374,655		1,404,586		1,365,753		1,366,415	8		3
Multi-family		3,091,314		3,125,505		3,193,339		2,988,940		2,922,432	(4	)	6
Mixed use and other		1,652,759		1,685,018		1,588,584		1,439,186		1,437,328	(8	)	15
Home equity		455,683		445,028		427,043		356,313		340,349	10		34
Residential real estate
Residential real estate loans for investment		3,561,417		3,456,009		3,252,649		2,933,157		2,746,916	12		30
Residential mortgage loans, early buy-out eligible loans guaranteed by U.S. government agencies		86,952		114,985		92,355		88,503		90,911	(99	)	(4	)
Residential mortgage loans, early buy-out exercised loans guaranteed by U.S. government agencies		36,790		41,771		43,034		45,675		52,439	(48	)	(30	)
Total core loans	$	29,108,500	$	28,804,138	$	28,363,712	$	26,259,487	$	25,402,132	4	%	15	%

Niche loans:
Commercial
Franchise	$	1,262,555	$	1,268,521	$	1,191,686	$	1,150,460	$	1,122,302	(2	)%	12	%
Mortgage warehouse lines of credit		1,019,543		893,854		750,462		593,519		403,245	57		NM
Community Advantage – homeowners association		525,492		525,446		501,645		491,722		475,832	0		10
Insurance agency lending		1,070,979		1,044,329		1,048,686		1,030,119		964,022	10		11
Premium Finance receivables
U.S. property & casualty insurance		6,486,663		6,447,625		6,253,271		6,142,654		6,113,993	2		6
Canada property & casualty insurance		753,199		824,417		878,410		958,099		826,026	(35	)	(9	)
Life insurance		8,365,140		8,147,145		7,996,899		7,962,115		7,872,033	11		6
Consumer and other		116,319		99,562		82,676		87,356		51,121	68		NM
Total niche loans	$	19,599,890	$	19,250,899	$	18,703,735	$	18,416,044	$	17,828,574	7	%	10	%

Total loans, net of unearned income	$	48,708,390	$	48,055,037	$	47,067,447	$	44,675,531	$	43,230,706	6	%	13	%

^{(1) Annualized.}

TABLE 2: DEPOSIT PORTFOLIO MIX AND GROWTH RATES

																% Growth From
(Dollars in thousands)	Mar 31, 2025			Dec 31, 2024			Sep 30, 2024			Jun 30, 2024			Mar 31, 2024			Dec 31, 2024 ⁽¹⁾		Mar 31, 2024
Balance:
Non-interest-bearing	$	11,201,859		$	11,410,018		$	10,739,132		$	10,031,440		$	9,908,183		(7	)%	13	%
NOW and interest-bearing demand deposits		6,340,168			5,865,546			5,466,932			5,053,909			5,720,947		33		11
Wealth management deposits ⁽²⁾		1,408,790			1,469,064			1,303,354			1,490,711			1,347,817		(17	)	5
Money market		18,074,733			17,975,191			17,713,726			16,320,017			15,617,717		2		16
Savings		6,576,251			6,372,499			6,183,249			5,882,179			5,959,774		13		10
Time certificates of deposit		9,968,237			9,420,031			9,998,573			9,270,770			7,894,420		24		26
Total deposits	$	53,570,038		$	52,512,349		$	51,404,966		$	48,049,026		$	46,448,858		8	%	15	%
Mix:
Non-interest-bearing		21	%		22	%		21	%		21	%		21	%
NOW and interest-bearing demand deposits		12			11			11			11			12
Wealth management deposits ⁽²⁾		3			3			3			3			3
Money market		34			34			34			34			34
Savings		12			12			12			12			13
Time certificates of deposit		18			18			19			19			17
Total deposits		100	%		100	%		100	%		100	%		100	%

^{(1) Annualized.
(2) Represents deposit balances of the Company’s subsidiary banks from brokerage customers of Wintrust Investments, Chicago Deferred Exchange Company, LLC (“CDEC”), and trust and asset management customers of the Company.}

TABLE 3: TIME CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT MATURITY/RE-PRICING ANALYSIS
As of March 31, 2025

(Dollars in thousands)	Total Time Certificates of Deposit		Weighted-Average Rate of Maturing Time Certificates of Deposit
1-3 months	$	3,845,120	4.34	%
4-6 months		2,345,184	3.81
7-9 months		2,694,739	3.72
10-12 months		711,206	3.62
13-18 months		210,063	3.03
19-24 months		87,336	2.72
24+ months		74,589	2.47
Total	$	9,968,237	3.94	%

TABLE 4: QUARTERLY AVERAGE BALANCES

	Average Balance for three months ended,
	Mar 31,			Dec 31,			Sep 30,			Jun 30,			Mar 31,
(In thousands)		2025			2024			2024			2024			2024
Interest-bearing deposits with banks, securities purchased under resale agreements and cash equivalents ⁽¹⁾	$	3,520,048		$	3,934,016		$	2,413,728		$	1,485,481		$	1,254,332
Investment securities ⁽²⁾		8,409,735			8,090,271			8,276,576			8,203,764			8,349,796
FHLB and FRB stock		281,702			271,825			263,707			253,614			230,648
Liquidity management assets ⁽³⁾	$	12,211,485		$	12,296,112		$	10,954,011		$	9,942,859		$	9,834,776
Other earning assets ⁽³⁾⁽⁴⁾		13,140			20,528			17,542			15,257			15,081
Mortgage loans held-for-sale		286,710			378,707			376,251			347,236			290,275
Loans, net of unearned income ⁽³⁾⁽⁵⁾		47,833,380			47,153,014			45,920,586			43,819,354			42,129,893
Total earning assets ⁽³⁾	$	60,344,715		$	59,848,361		$	57,268,390		$	54,124,706		$	52,270,025
Allowance for loan and investment security losses		(375,371	)		(367,238	)		(383,736	)		(360,504	)		(361,734	)
Cash and due from banks		476,423			470,033			467,333			434,916			450,267
Other assets		3,661,275			3,642,949			3,563,296			3,294,066			3,244,137
Total assets	$	64,107,042		$	63,594,105		$	60,915,283		$	57,493,184		$	55,602,695

NOW and interest-bearing demand deposits	$	6,046,189		$	5,601,672		$	5,174,673		$	4,985,306		$	5,680,265
Wealth management deposits		1,574,480			1,430,163			1,362,747			1,531,865			1,510,203
Money market accounts		17,581,141			17,579,395			16,436,111			15,272,126			14,474,492
Savings accounts		6,479,444			6,288,727			6,096,746			5,878,844			5,792,118
Time deposits		9,406,126			9,702,948			9,598,109			8,546,172			7,148,456
Interest-bearing deposits	$	41,087,380		$	40,602,905		$	38,668,386		$	36,214,313		$	34,605,534
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		3,151,309			3,160,658			3,178,973			3,096,920			2,728,849
Other borrowings		582,139			577,786			622,792			587,262			627,711
Subordinated notes		298,306			298,225			298,135			410,331			437,893
Junior subordinated debentures		253,566			253,566			253,566			253,566			253,566
Total interest-bearing liabilities	$	45,372,700		$	44,893,140		$	43,021,852		$	40,562,392		$	38,653,553
Non-interest-bearing deposits		10,732,156			10,718,738			10,271,613			9,879,134			9,972,646
Other liabilities		1,541,245			1,563,824			1,631,389			1,601,485			1,536,039
Equity		6,460,941			6,418,403			5,990,429			5,450,173			5,440,457
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	64,107,042		$	63,594,105		$	60,915,283		$	57,493,184		$	55,602,695

Net free funds/contribution ⁽⁶⁾	$	14,972,015		$	14,955,221		$	14,246,538		$	13,562,314		$	13,616,472

^{(1)   Includes interest-bearing deposits from banks and securities purchased under resale agreements with original maturities of greater than three months. Cash equivalents include federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements with original maturities of three months or less.}
^{(2)   Investment securities includes investment securities classified as available-for-sale and held-to-maturity, and equity securities with readily determinable fair values. Equity securities without readily determinable fair values are included within other assets.}
^{(3)   See Table 17: Supplemental Non-GAAP Financial Measures/Ratios for additional information on this performance measure/ratio.}
^{(4)   Other earning assets include brokerage customer receivables and trading account securities.}
^{(5)   Loans, net of unearned income, include non-accrual loans.}
^{(6)   Net free funds are the difference between total average earning assets and total average interest-bearing liabilities. The estimated contribution to net interest margin from net free funds is calculated using the rate paid for total interest-bearing liabilities.}

TABLE 5: QUARTERLY NET INTEREST INCOME

	Net Interest Income for three months ended,
	Mar 31,			Dec 31,			Sep 30,			Jun 30,			Mar 31,
(In thousands)		2025			2024			2024			2024			2024
Interest income:
Interest-bearing deposits with banks, securities purchased under resale agreements and cash equivalents	$	36,945		$	46,308		$	32,885		$	19,748		$	16,677
Investment securities		72,706			67,783			70,260			70,346			70,228
FHLB and FRB stock		5,307			5,157			5,451			4,974			4,478
Liquidity management assets ⁽¹⁾	$	114,958		$	119,248		$	108,596		$	95,068		$	91,383
Other earning assets ⁽¹⁾		92			310			282			235			198
Mortgage loans held-for-sale		4,246			5,623			6,233			5,434			4,146
Loans, net of unearned income ⁽¹⁾		770,568			791,390			796,637			752,117			712,587
Total interest income	$	889,864		$	916,571		$	911,748		$	852,854		$	808,314

Interest expense:
NOW and interest-bearing demand deposits	$	33,600		$	31,695		$	30,971		$	32,719		$	34,896
Wealth management deposits		8,606			9,412			10,158			10,294			10,461
Money market accounts		146,374			159,945			167,382			155,100			137,984
Savings accounts		35,923			38,402			42,892			41,063			39,071
Time deposits		95,730			106,934			110,616			96,527			77,120
Interest-bearing deposits	$	320,233		$	346,388		$	362,019		$	335,703		$	299,532
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		25,441			26,050			26,254			24,797			22,048
Other borrowings		6,792			7,519			9,013			8,700			9,248
Subordinated notes		3,714			3,733			3,712			5,185			5,487
Junior subordinated debentures		4,311			4,663			5,023			4,984			5,004
Total interest expense	$	360,491		$	388,353		$	406,021		$	379,369		$	341,319

Less: Fully taxable-equivalent adjustment		(2,899	)		(3,070	)		(3,144	)		(2,875	)		(2,801	)
Net interest income (GAAP) ⁽²⁾		526,474			525,148			502,583			470,610			464,194
Fully taxable-equivalent adjustment		2,899			3,070			3,144			2,875			2,801
Net interest income, fully taxable-equivalent (non-GAAP) ⁽²⁾	$	529,373		$	528,218		$	505,727		$	473,485		$	466,995

^{(1) Interest income on tax-advantaged loans, trading securities and investment securities reflects a taxable-equivalent adjustment based on the marginal federal corporate tax rate in effect as of the applicable period.}
^{(2) See Table 17: Supplemental Non-GAAP Financial Measures/Ratios for additional information on this performance measure/ratio.}

TABLE 6: QUARTERLY NET INTEREST MARGIN

	Net Interest Margin for three months ended,
	Mar 31, 2025		Dec 31, 2024		Sep 30, 2024		Jun 30, 2024		Mar 31, 2024
Yield earned on:
Interest-bearing deposits with banks, securities purchased under resale agreements and cash equivalents	4.26	%	4.68	%	5.42	%	5.35	%	5.35	%
Investment securities	3.51		3.33		3.38		3.45		3.38
FHLB and FRB stock	7.64		7.55		8.22		7.89		7.81
Liquidity management assets	3.82	%	3.86	%	3.94	%	3.85	%	3.74	%
Other earning assets	2.84		6.01		6.38		6.23		5.25
Mortgage loans held-for-sale	6.01		5.91		6.59		6.29		5.74
Loans, net of unearned income	6.53		6.68		6.90		6.90		6.80
Total earning assets	5.98	%	6.09	%	6.33	%	6.34	%	6.22	%

Rate paid on:
NOW and interest-bearing demand deposits	2.25	%	2.25	%	2.38	%	2.64	%	2.47	%
Wealth management deposits	2.22		2.62		2.97		2.70		2.79
Money market accounts	3.38		3.62		4.05		4.08		3.83
Savings accounts	2.25		2.43		2.80		2.81		2.71
Time deposits	4.13		4.38		4.58		4.54		4.34
Interest-bearing deposits	3.16	%	3.39	%	3.72	%	3.73	%	3.48	%
Federal Home Loan Bank advances	3.27		3.28		3.29		3.22		3.25
Other borrowings	4.73		5.18		5.76		5.96		5.92
Subordinated notes	5.05		4.98		4.95		5.08		5.04
Junior subordinated debentures	6.90		7.32		7.88		7.91		7.94
Total interest-bearing liabilities	3.22	%	3.44	%	3.75	%	3.76	%	3.55	%

Interest rate spread ⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾	2.76	%	2.65	%	2.58	%	2.58	%	2.67	%
Less: Fully taxable-equivalent adjustment	(0.02	)	(0.02	)	(0.02	)	(0.02	)	(0.02	)
Net free funds/contribution ⁽³⁾	0.80		0.86		0.93		0.94		0.92
Net interest margin (GAAP) ⁽²⁾	3.54	%	3.49	%	3.49	%	3.50	%	3.57	%
Fully taxable-equivalent adjustment	0.02		0.02		0.02		0.02		0.02
Net interest margin, fully taxable-equivalent (non-GAAP) ⁽²⁾	3.56	%	3.51	%	3.51	%	3.52	%	3.59	%

^{(1)   Interest rate spread is the difference between the yield earned on earning assets and the rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities.}
^{(2)   See Table 17: Supplemental Non-GAAP Financial Measures/Ratios for additional information on this performance measure/ratio.}
^{(3)   Net free funds are the difference between total average earning assets and total average interest-bearing liabilities. The estimated contribution to net interest margin from net free funds is calculated using the rate paid for total interest-bearing liabilities.}

TABLE 7: INTEREST RATE SENSITIVITY

As an ongoing part of its financial strategy, the Company attempts to manage the impact of fluctuations in market interest rates on net interest income. Management measures its exposure to changes in interest rates by modeling many different interest rate scenarios.

The following interest rate scenarios display the percentage change in net interest income over a one-year time horizon assuming increases and decreases of 100 and 200 basis points as compared to projected net interest income in a scenario with no assumed rate changes. The Static Shock Scenario results incorporate actual cash flows and repricing characteristics for balance sheet instruments following an instantaneous, parallel change in market rates based upon a static (i.e. no growth or constant) balance sheet. Conversely, the Ramp Scenario results incorporate management’s projections of future volume and pricing of each of the product lines following a gradual, parallel change in market rates over twelve months. Actual results may differ from these simulated results due to timing, magnitude, and frequency of interest rate changes as well as changes in market conditions and management strategies. The interest rate sensitivity for both the Static Shock and Ramp Scenario is as follows:

Static Shock Scenario	+200 Basis Points		+100 Basis Points		-100 Basis Points		-200 Basis Points
Mar 31, 2025	(1.8	)%	(0.6	)%	(0.2	)%	(1.2	)%
Dec 31, 2024	(1.6	)	(0.6	)	(0.3	)	(1.5	)
Sep 30, 2024	1.2		1.1		0.4		(0.9	)
Jun 30, 2024	1.5		1.0		0.6		(0.0	)
Mar 31, 2024	1.9		1.4		1.5		1.6

Ramp Scenario	+200 Basis Points		+100 Basis Points		-100 Basis Points		-200 Basis Points
Mar 31, 2025	0.2	%	0.2	%	(0.1	)%	(0.5	)%
Dec 31, 2024	(0.2	)	(0.0	)	0.0		(0.3	)
Sep 30, 2024	1.6		1.2		0.7		0.5
Jun 30, 2024	1.2		1.0		0.9		1.0
Mar 31, 2024	0.8		0.6		1.3		2.0

As shown above, the magnitude of potential changes in net interest income in various interest rate scenarios has continued to remain relatively neutral. As the current interest rate cycle progressed, management took action to reposition its sensitivity to interest rates. To this end, management has executed various derivative instruments including collars and receive fixed swaps to hedge variable rate loan exposures and originated a higher percentage of its loan originations in longer-term fixed-rate loans. The Company will continue to monitor current and projected interest rates and may execute additional derivatives to mitigate potential fluctuations in the net interest margin in future periods.

TABLE 8: MATURITIES AND SENSITIVITIES TO CHANGES IN INTEREST RATES

	Loans repricing or contractual maturity period
As of March 31, 2025 (In thousands)	One year or less			From one to five years		From five to fifteen years		After fifteen years		Total
Commercial
Fixed rate	$	405,736		$	3,600,171	$	2,122,563	$	20,444	$	6,148,914
Variable rate		9,781,709			703		—		—		9,782,412
Total commercial	$	10,187,445		$	3,600,874	$	2,122,563	$	20,444	$	15,931,326
Commercial real estate
Fixed rate	$	658,413		$	2,762,221	$	365,181	$	63,593	$	3,849,408
Variable rate		9,054,583			10,843		67		—		9,065,493
Total commercial real estate	$	9,712,996		$	2,773,064	$	365,248	$	63,593	$	12,914,901
Home equity
Fixed rate	$	8,881		$	838	$	—	$	17	$	9,736
Variable rate		445,947			—		—		—		445,947
Total home equity	$	454,828		$	838	$	—	$	17	$	455,683
Residential real estate
Fixed rate	$	13,336		$	4,473	$	74,883	$	1,055,143	$	1,147,835
Variable rate		97,815			623,879		1,815,630		—		2,537,324
Total residential real estate	$	111,151		$	628,352	$	1,890,513	$	1,055,143	$	3,685,159
Premium finance receivables – property & casualty
Fixed rate	$	7,135,963		$	103,899	$	—	$	—	$	7,239,862
Variable rate		—			—		—		—		—
Total premium finance receivables – property & casualty	$	7,135,963		$	103,899	$	—	$	—	$	7,239,862
Premium finance receivables – life insurance
Fixed rate	$	350,802		$	207,832	$	4,000	$	4,248	$	566,882
Variable rate		7,798,258			—		—		—		7,798,258
Total premium finance receivables – life insurance	$	8,149,060		$	207,832	$	4,000	$	4,248	$	8,365,140
Consumer and other
Fixed rate	$	44,731		$	7,937	$	883	$	914	$	54,465
Variable rate		61,854			—		—		—		61,854
Total consumer and other	$	106,585		$	7,937	$	883	$	914	$	116,319

Total per category
Fixed rate	$	8,617,862		$	6,687,371	$	2,567,510	$	1,144,359	$	19,017,102
Variable rate		27,240,166			635,425		1,815,697		—		29,691,288
Total loans, net of unearned income	$	35,858,028		$	7,322,796	$	4,383,207	$	1,144,359	$	48,708,390
Less: Existing cash flow hedging derivatives ⁽¹⁾		(6,700,000	)
Total loans repricing or maturing in one year or less, adjusted for cash flow hedging activity	$	29,158,028

Variable Rate Loan Pricing by Index:
SOFR tenors ⁽²⁾										$	18,328,835
12- month CMT ⁽³⁾											6,722,305
Prime											3,420,624
Fed Funds											819,437
Other U.S. Treasury tenors											190,187
Other											209,900
Total variable rate										$	29,691,288

^{(1)   Excludes cash flow hedges with future effective starting dates.}
^{(2)   SOFR – Secured Overnight Financing Rate.}
^{(3)   CMT – Constant Maturity Treasury Rate.}

Graph available at the following link: http://ml.globenewswire.com/Resource/Download/bebf97a7-5d4d-430d-a436-ae832412a4db

Source: Bloomberg

As noted in the table on the previous page, the majority of the Company’s portfolio is tied to SOFR and CMT indices which, as shown in the table above, do not mirror the same changes as the Prime rate, which has historically moved when the Federal Reserve raises or lowers interest rates. Specifically, the Company has variable rate loans of $15.4 billion tied to one-month SOFR and $6.7 billion tied to twelve-month CMT. The above chart shows:

	Basis Point (bp) Change in
	1-month SOFR			12- month CMT			Prime
First Quarter 2025	(1	)	bps	(13	)	bps	0		bps
Fourth Quarter 2024	(52	)		18			(50	)
Third Quarter 2024	(49	)		(111	)		(50	)
Second Quarter 2024	1			6			0
First Quarter 2024	(2	)		24			0

TABLE 9: ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES

	Three Months Ended
	Mar 31,			Dec 31,			Sep 30,			Jun 30,			Mar 31,
(Dollars in thousands)		2025			2024			2024			2024			2024
Allowance for credit losses at beginning of period	$	437,060		$	436,193		$	437,560		$	427,504		$	427,612
Provision for credit losses – Other		23,963			16,979			6,787			40,061			21,673
Provision for credit losses – Day 1 on non-PCD assets acquired during the period		—			—			15,547			—			—
Initial allowance for credit losses recognized on PCD assets acquired during the period		—			—			3,004			—			—
Other adjustments		4			(187	)		30			(19	)		(31	)
Charge-offs:
Commercial		9,722			5,090			22,975			9,584			11,215
Commercial real estate		454			1,037			95			15,526			5,469
Home equity		—			—			—			—			74
Residential real estate		—			114			—			23			38
Premium finance receivables – property & casualty		7,114			13,301			7,790			9,486			6,938
Premium finance receivables – life insurance		12			—			4			—			—
Consumer and other		147			189			154			137			107
Total charge-offs		17,449			19,731			31,018			34,756			23,841
Recoveries:
Commercial		929			775			649			950			479
Commercial real estate		12			172			30			90			31
Home equity		216			194			101			35			29
Residential real estate		136			0			5			8			2
Premium finance receivables – property & casualty		3,487			2,646			3,436			3,658			1,519
Premium finance receivables – life insurance		—			—			41			5			8
Consumer and other		29			19			21			24			23
Total recoveries		4,809			3,806			4,283			4,770			2,091
Net charge-offs		(12,640	)		(15,925	)		(26,735	)		(29,986	)		(21,750	)
Allowance for credit losses at period end	$	448,387		$	437,060		$	436,193		$	437,560		$	427,504

Annualized net charge-offs (recoveries) by category as a percentage of its own respective category’s average:
Commercial		0.23	%		0.11	%		0.61	%		0.25	%		0.33	%
Commercial real estate		0.01			0.03			0.00			0.53			0.19
Home equity		(0.20	)		(0.18	)		(0.10	)		(0.04	)		0.05
Residential real estate		(0.02	)		0.01			0.00			0.00			0.01
Premium finance receivables – property & casualty		0.20			0.59			0.24			0.33			0.32
Premium finance receivables – life insurance		0.00			—			(0.00	)		(0.00	)		(0.00	)
Consumer and other		0.45			0.63			0.63			0.56			0.42
Total loans, net of unearned income		0.11	%		0.13	%		0.23	%		0.28	%		0.21	%

Loans at period end	$	48,708,390		$	48,055,037		$	47,067,447		$	44,675,531		$	43,230,706
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of loans at period end		0.78	%		0.76	%		0.77	%		0.81	%		0.81	%
Allowance for loan and unfunded lending-related commitment losses as a percentage of loans at period end		0.92			0.91			0.93			0.98			0.99

^{PCD – Purchase Credit Deteriorated}

TABLE 10: ALLOWANCE AND PROVISION FOR CREDIT LOSSES BY COMPONENT

	Three Months Ended
	Mar 31,			Dec 31,			Sep 30,			Jun 30,			Mar 31,
(In thousands)		2025			2024			2024			2024			2024
Provision for loan losses – Other	$	26,826		$	19,852		$	6,782		$	45,111		$	26,159
Provision for credit losses – Day 1 on non-PCD assets acquired during the period		—			—			15,547			—			—
Provision for unfunded lending-related commitments losses – Other		(2,852	)		(2,851	)		17			(5,212	)		(4,468	)
Provision for held-to-maturity securities losses		(11	)		(22	)		(12	)		162			(18	)
Provision for credit losses	$	23,963		$	16,979		$	22,334		$	40,061		$	21,673

Allowance for loan losses	$	378,207		$	364,017		$	360,279		$	363,719		$	348,612
Allowance for unfunded lending-related commitments losses		69,734			72,586			75,435			73,350			78,563
Allowance for loan losses and unfunded lending-related commitments losses		447,941			436,603			435,714			437,069			427,175
Allowance for held-to-maturity securities losses		446			457			479			491			329
Allowance for credit losses	$	448,387		$	437,060		$	436,193		$	437,560		$	427,504

^{PCD – Purchase Credit Deteriorated}

TABLE 11: ALLOWANCE BY LOAN PORTFOLIO

The table below summarizes the calculation of allowance for loan losses and allowance for unfunded lending-related commitments losses for the Company’s loan portfolios as well as core and niche portfolios, as of March 31, 2025, December 31, 2024 and September 30, 2024.

	As of Mar 31, 2025						As of Dec 31, 2024						As of Sep 30, 2024
(Dollars in thousands)	Recorded Investment		Calculated Allowance		% of its category’s balance		Recorded Investment		Calculated Allowance		% of its category’s balance		Recorded Investment		Calculated Allowance		% of its category’s balance
Commercial:
Commercial, industrial and other	$	15,931,326	$	201,183	1.26	%	$	15,574,551	$	175,837	1.13	%	$	15,247,693	$	171,598	1.13	%
Commercial real estate:
Construction and development		2,448,881		71,388	2.92			2,434,081		87,236	3.58			2,403,690		97,949	4.07
Non-construction		10,466,020		138,622	1.32			10,469,863		135,620	1.30			10,389,727		133,195	1.28
Total commercial real estate	$	12,914,901	$	210,010	1.63	%	$	12,903,944	$	222,856	1.73	%	$	12,793,417	$	231,144	1.81	%
Total commercial and commercial real estate	$	28,846,227	$	411,193	1.43	%	$	28,478,495	$	398,693	1.40	%	$	28,041,110	$	402,742	1.44	%
Home equity		455,683		9,139	2.01			445,028		8,943	2.01			427,043		8,823	2.07
Residential real estate		3,685,159		10,652	0.29			3,612,765		10,335	0.29			3,388,038		9,745	0.29
Premium finance receivables
Property and casualty insurance		7,239,862		15,310	0.21			7,272,042		17,111	0.24			7,131,681		13,045	0.18
Life insurance		8,365,140		729	0.01			8,147,145		709	0.01			7,996,899		698	0.01
Consumer and other		116,319		918	0.79			99,562		812	0.82			82,676		661	0.80
Total loans, net of unearned income	$	48,708,390	$	447,941	0.92	%	$	48,055,037	$	436,603	0.91	%	$	47,067,447	$	435,714	0.93	%

Total core loans ⁽¹⁾	$	29,108,500	$	397,664	1.37	%	$	28,804,138	$	392,319	1.36	%	$	28,363,712	$	396,394	1.40	%
Total niche loans ⁽¹⁾		19,599,890		50,277	0.26			19,250,899		44,284	0.23			18,703,735		39,320	0.21

^{(1) See Table 1 for additional detail on core and niche loans.}

TABLE 12: LOAN PORTFOLIO AGING

(In thousands)	Mar 31, 2025		Dec 31, 2024		Sep 30, 2024		Jun 30, 2024		Mar 31, 2024
Loan Balances:
Commercial
Nonaccrual	$	70,560	$	73,490	$	63,826	$	51,087	$	31,740
90+ days and still accruing		46		104		20		304		27
60-89 days past due		15,243		54,844		32,560		16,485		30,248
30-59 days past due		97,397		92,551		46,057		36,358		77,715
Current		15,748,080		15,353,562		15,105,230		14,050,228		13,363,751
Total commercial	$	15,931,326	$	15,574,551	$	15,247,693	$	14,154,462	$	13,503,481
Commercial real estate
Nonaccrual	$	26,187	$	21,042	$	42,071	$	48,289	$	39,262
90+ days and still accruing		—		—		225		—		—
60-89 days past due		6,995		10,521		13,439		6,555		16,713
30-59 days past due		83,653		30,766		48,346		38,065		32,998
Current		12,798,066		12,841,615		12,689,336		11,854,288		11,544,464
Total commercial real estate	$	12,914,901	$	12,903,944	$	12,793,417	$	11,947,197	$	11,633,437
Home equity
Nonaccrual	$	2,070	$	1,117	$	1,122	$	1,100	$	838
90+ days and still accruing		—		—		—		—		—
60-89 days past due		984		1,233		1,035		275		212
30-59 days past due		3,403		2,148		2,580		1,229		1,617
Current		449,226		440,530		422,306		353,709		337,682
Total home equity	$	455,683	$	445,028	$	427,043	$	356,313	$	340,349
Residential real estate
Early buy-out loans guaranteed by U.S. government agencies ⁽¹⁾	$	123,742	$	156,756	$	135,389	$	134,178	$	143,350
Nonaccrual		22,522		23,762		17,959		18,198		17,901
90+ days and still accruing		—		—		—		—		—
60-89 days past due		1,351		5,708		6,364		1,977		—
30-59 days past due		38,943		18,917		2,160		130		24,523
Current		3,498,601		3,407,622		3,226,166		2,912,852		2,704,492
Total residential real estate	$	3,685,159	$	3,612,765	$	3,388,038	$	3,067,335	$	2,890,266
Premium finance receivables – property & casualty
Nonaccrual	$	29,846	$	28,797	$	36,079	$	32,722	$	32,648
90+ days and still accruing		18,081		16,031		18,235		22,427		25,877
60-89 days past due		19,717		19,042		18,740		29,925		15,274
30-59 days past due		39,459		68,219		30,204		45,927		59,729
Current		7,132,759		7,139,953		7,028,423		6,969,752		6,806,491
Total Premium finance receivables – property & casualty	$	7,239,862	$	7,272,042	$	7,131,681	$	7,100,753	$	6,940,019
Premium finance receivables – life insurance
Nonaccrual	$	—	$	6,431	$	—	$	—	$	—
90+ days and still accruing		2,962		—		—		—		—
60-89 days past due		10,587		72,963		10,902		4,118		32,482
30-59 days past due		29,924		36,405		74,432		17,693		100,137
Current		8,321,667		8,031,346		7,911,565		7,940,304		7,739,414
Total Premium finance receivables – life insurance	$	8,365,140	$	8,147,145	$	7,996,899	$	7,962,115	$	7,872,033
Consumer and other
Nonaccrual	$	18	$	2	$	2	$	3	$	19
90+ days and still accruing		98		47		148		121		47
60-89 days past due		162		59		22		81		16
30-59 days past due		542		882		264		366		210
Current		115,499		98,572		82,240		86,785		50,829
Total consumer and other	$	116,319	$	99,562	$	82,676	$	87,356	$	51,121
Total loans, net of unearned income
Early buy-out loans guaranteed by U.S. government agencies ⁽¹⁾	$	123,742	$	156,756	$	135,389	$	134,178	$	143,350
Nonaccrual		151,203		154,641		161,059		151,399		122,408
90+ days and still accruing		21,187		16,182		18,628		22,852		25,951
60-89 days past due		55,039		164,370		83,062		59,416		94,945
30-59 days past due		293,321		249,888		204,043		139,768		296,929
Current		48,063,898		47,313,200		46,465,266		44,167,918		42,547,123
Total loans, net of unearned income	$	48,708,390	$	48,055,037	$	47,067,447	$	44,675,531	$	43,230,706

^{(1) Early buy-out loans are insured or guaranteed by the Federal Housing Administration or the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, subject to indemnifications and insurance limits for certain loans.}

TABLE 13: NON-PERFORMING ASSETS⁽¹⁾

	Mar 31,			Dec 31,			Sep 30,			Jun 30,			Mar 31,
(Dollars in thousands)		2025			2024			2024			2024			2024
Loans past due greater than 90 days and still accruing:
Commercial	$	46		$	104		$	20		$	304		$	27
Commercial real estate		—			—			225			—			—
Home equity		—			—			—			—			—
Residential real estate		—			—			—			—			—
Premium finance receivables – property & casualty		18,081			16,031			18,235			22,427			25,877
Premium finance receivables – life insurance		2,962			—			—			—			—
Consumer and other		98			47			148			121			47
Total loans past due greater than 90 days and still accruing		21,187			16,182			18,628			22,852			25,951
Non-accrual loans:
Commercial		70,560			73,490			63,826			51,087			31,740
Commercial real estate		26,187			21,042			42,071			48,289			39,262
Home equity		2,070			1,117			1,122			1,100			838
Residential real estate		22,522			23,762			17,959			18,198			17,901
Premium finance receivables – property & casualty		29,846			28,797			36,079			32,722			32,648
Premium finance receivables – life insurance		—			6,431			—			—			—
Consumer and other		18			2			2			3			19
Total non-accrual loans		151,203			154,641			161,059			151,399			122,408
Total non-performing loans:
Commercial		70,606			73,594			63,846			51,391			31,767
Commercial real estate		26,187			21,042			42,296			48,289			39,262
Home equity		2,070			1,117			1,122			1,100			838
Residential real estate		22,522			23,762			17,959			18,198			17,901
Premium finance receivables – property & casualty		47,927			44,828			54,314			55,149			58,525
Premium finance receivables – life insurance		2,962			6,431			—			—			—
Consumer and other		116			49			150			124			66
Total non-performing loans	$	172,390		$	170,823		$	179,687		$	174,251		$	148,359
Other real estate owned		22,625			23,116			13,682			19,731			14,538
Total non-performing assets	$	195,015		$	193,939		$	193,369		$	193,982		$	162,897
Total non-performing loans by category as a percent of its own respective category’s period-end balance:
Commercial		0.44	%		0.47	%		0.42	%		0.36	%		0.24	%
Commercial real estate		0.20			0.16			0.33			0.40			0.34
Home equity		0.45			0.25			0.26			0.31			0.25
Residential real estate		0.61			0.66			0.53			0.59			0.62
Premium finance receivables – property & casualty		0.66			0.62			0.76			0.78			0.84
Premium finance receivables – life insurance		0.04			0.08			—			—			—
Consumer and other		0.10			0.05			0.18			0.14			0.13
Total loans, net of unearned income		0.35	%		0.36	%		0.38	%		0.39	%		0.34	%
Total non-performing assets as a percentage of total assets		0.30	%		0.30	%		0.30	%		0.32	%		0.28	%
Allowance for loan losses and unfunded lending-related commitments losses as a percentage of non-accrual loans		296.25	%		282.33	%		270.53	%		288.69	%		348.98	%

^{(1) Excludes early buy-out loans guaranteed by U.S. government agencies. Early buy-out loans are insured or guaranteed by the Federal Housing Administration or the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, subject to indemnifications and insurance limits for certain loans.}

Non-performing Loans Rollforward, excluding early buy-out loans guaranteed by U.S. government agencies

	Three Months Ended
	Mar 31,			Dec 31,			Sep 30,			Jun 30,			Mar 31,
(In thousands)		2025			2024			2024			2024			2024

Balance at beginning of period	$	170,823		$	179,687		$	174,251		$	148,359		$	139,030
Additions from becoming non-performing in the respective period		27,721			30,931			42,335			54,376			23,142
Additions from assets acquired in the respective period		—			—			189			—			—
Return to performing status		(1,207	)		(1,108	)		(362	)		(912	)		(490	)
Payments received		(15,965	)		(12,219	)		(10,894	)		(9,611	)		(8,336	)
Transfer to OREO and other repossessed assets		—			(17,897	)		(3,680	)		(6,945	)		(1,381	)
Charge-offs, net		(8,600	)		(5,612	)		(21,211	)		(7,673	)		(14,810	)
Net change for premium finance receivables		(382	)		(2,959	)		(941	)		(3,343	)		11,204
Balance at end of period	$	172,390		$	170,823		$	179,687		$	174,251		$	148,359

Other Real Estate Owned

	Three Months Ended
	Mar 31,			Dec 31,			Sep 30,			Jun 30,			Mar 31,
(In thousands)		2025			2024			2024			2024			2024
Balance at beginning of period	$	23,116		$	13,682		$	19,731		$	14,538		$	13,309
Disposals/resolved		—			(8,545	)		(9,729	)		(1,752	)		—
Transfers in at fair value, less costs to sell		—			17,979			3,680			6,945			1,436
Fair value adjustments		(491	)		—			—			—			(207	)
Balance at end of period	$	22,625		$	23,116		$	13,682		$	19,731		$	14,538

	Period End
	Mar 31,			Dec 31,			Sep 30,			Jun 30,			Mar 31,
Balance by Property Type:		2025			2024			2024			2024			2024
Residential real estate	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	161		$	1,146
Commercial real estate		22,625			23,116			13,682			19,570			13,392
Total	$	22,625		$	23,116		$	13,682		$	19,731		$	14,538

TABLE 14: NON-INTEREST INCOME

	Three Months Ended															Q1 2025 compared to Q4 2024					Q1 2025 compared to Q1 2024
	Mar 31,			Dec 31,			Sep 30,			Jun 30,			Mar 31,			Q1 2025 compared to Q4 2024					Q1 2025 compared to Q1 2024
(Dollars in thousands)		2025			2024			2024			2024			2024		$ Change			% Change		$ Change			% Change
Brokerage	$	4,757		$	5,328		$	6,139		$	5,588		$	5,556		$	(571	)	(11	)%	$	(799	)	(14	)%
Trust and asset management		29,285			33,447			31,085			29,825			29,259			(4,162	)	(12	)		26		0
Total wealth management		34,042			38,775			37,224			35,413			34,815			(4,733	)	(12	)		(773	)	(2	)
Mortgage banking		20,529			20,452			15,974			29,124			27,663			77		0			(7,134	)	(26	)
Service charges on deposit accounts		19,362			18,864			16,430			15,546			14,811			498		3			4,551		31
Gains (losses) on investment securities, net		3,196			(2,835	)		3,189			(4,282	)		1,326			6,031		NM			1,870		NM
Fees from covered call options		3,446			2,305			988			2,056			4,847			1,141		50			(1,401	)	(29	)
Trading (losses) gains, net		(64	)		(113	)		(130	)		70			677			49		(43	)		(741	)	NM
Operating lease income, net		15,287			15,327			15,335			13,938			14,110			(40	)	(0	)		1,177		8
Other:
Interest rate swap fees		2,269			3,360			2,914			3,392			2,828			(1,091	)	(32	)		(559	)	(20	)
BOLI		796			1,236			1,517			1,351			1,651			(440	)	(36	)		(855	)	(52	)
Administrative services		1,393			1,347			1,450			1,322			1,217			46		3			176		14
Foreign currency remeasurement (losses) gains		(183	)		(682	)		696			(145	)		(1,171	)		499		(73	)		988		(84	)
Changes in fair value on EBOs and loans held-for-investment		383			129			518			604			(439	)		254		NM			822		NM
Early pay-offs of capital leases		768			514			532			393			430			254		49			338		79
Miscellaneous		15,410			14,772			16,510			22,365			37,815			638		4			(22,405	)	(59	)
Total Other		20,836			20,676			24,137			29,282			42,331			160		1			(21,495	)	(51	)
Total Non-Interest Income	$	116,634		$	113,451		$	113,147		$	121,147		$	140,580		$	3,183		3	%	$	(23,946	)	(17	)%

^{NM – Not meaningful.
BOLI- Bank-owned life insurance.
EBO- Early buy-out.}

TABLE 15: MORTGAGE BANKING

	Three Months Ended
(Dollars in thousands)	Mar 31, 2025			Dec 31, 2024			Sep 30, 2024			Jun 30, 2024			Mar 31, 2024
Originations:
Retail originations	$	348,468		$	483,424		$	527,408		$	544,394		$	331,504
Veterans First originations		111,985			176,914			239,369			177,792			144,109
Total originations for sale (A)	$	460,453		$	660,338		$	766,777		$	722,186		$	475,613
Originations for investment		217,177			355,119			218,984			275,331			169,246
Total originations	$	677,630		$	1,015,457		$	985,761		$	997,517		$	644,859
As a percentage of originations for sale:
Retail originations		76	%		73	%		69	%		75	%		70	%
Veterans First originations		24			27			31			25			30
Purchases		77	%		65	%		72	%		83	%		75	%
Refinances		23			35			28			17			25
Production Margin:
Production revenue (B) ⁽¹⁾	$	9,941		$	6,993		$	13,113		$	14,990		$	13,435
Total originations for sale (A)	$	460,453		$	660,338		$	766,777		$	722,186		$	475,613
Add: Current period end mandatory interest rate lock commitments to fund originations for sale ⁽²⁾		197,297			103,946			272,072			222,738			207,775
Less: Prior period end mandatory interest rate lock commitments to fund originations for sale ⁽²⁾		103,946			272,072			222,738			207,775			119,624
Total mortgage production volume (C)	$	553,804		$	492,212		$	816,111		$	737,149		$	563,764
Production margin (B / C)		1.80	%		1.42	%		1.61	%		2.03	%		2.38	%
Mortgage Servicing:
Loans serviced for others (D)	$	12,402,352		$	12,400,913		$	12,253,361		$	12,211,027		$	12,051,392
Mortgage Servicing Rights (“MSR”), at fair value (E)		196,307			203,788			186,308			204,610			201,044
Percentage of MSRs to loans serviced for others (E / D)		1.58	%		1.64	%		1.52	%		1.68	%		1.67	%
Servicing income	$	10,611		$	10,731		$	10,809		$	10,586		$	10,498
MSR Fair Value Asset Activity
MSR – FV at Beginning of Period	$	203,788		$	186,308		$	204,610		$	201,044		$	192,456
MSR – current period capitalization		4,669			10,010			6,357			8,223			5,379
MSR – collection of expected cash flows – paydowns		(1,590	)		(1,463	)		(1,598	)		(1,504	)		(1,444	)
MSR – collection of expected cash flows – payoffs and repurchases		(3,046	)		(4,315	)		(5,730	)		(4,030	)		(2,942	)
MSR – changes in fair value model assumptions		(7,514	)		13,248			(17,331	)		877			7,595
MSR Fair Value at end of period	$	196,307		$	203,788		$	186,308		$	204,610		$	201,044
Summary of Mortgage Banking Revenue:
Operational:
Production revenue ⁽¹⁾	$	9,941		$	6,993		$	13,113		$	14,990		$	13,435
MSR – Current period capitalization		4,669			10,010			6,357			8,223			5,379
MSR – Collection of expected cash flows – paydowns		(1,590	)		(1,463	)		(1,598	)		(1,504	)		(1,444	)
MSR – Collection of expected cash flows – pay offs		(3,046	)		(4,315	)		(5,730	)		(4,030	)		(2,942	)
Servicing Income		10,611			10,731			10,809			10,586			10,498
Other Revenue		(172	)		(51	)		(67	)		112			(91	)
Total operational mortgage banking revenue	$	20,413		$	21,905		$	22,884		$	28,377		$	24,835
Fair Value:
MSR – changes in fair value model assumptions	$	(7,514	)	$	13,248		$	(17,331	)	$	877		$	7,595
Gain (loss) on derivative contract held as an economic hedge, net		4,897			(11,452	)		6,892			(772	)		(2,577	)
Changes in FV on early buy-out loans guaranteed by US Govt (HFS)		2,733			(3,249	)		3,529			642			(2,190	)
Total fair value mortgage banking revenue	$	116		$	(1,453	)	$	(6,910	)	$	747		$	2,828
Total mortgage banking revenue	$	20,529		$	20,452		$	15,974		$	29,124		$	27,663

^{(1) Production revenue represents revenue earned from the origination and subsequent sale of mortgages, including gains on loans sold and fees from originations, changes in other related financial instruments carried at fair value, processing and other related activities, and excludes servicing fees, changes in the fair value of servicing rights and changes to the mortgage recourse obligation and other non-production revenue.}
^{(2) Certain volume adjusted for the estimated pull-through rate of the loan, which represents the Company’s best estimate of the likelihood that a committed loan will ultimately fund.}

TABLE 16: NON-INTEREST EXPENSE

	Three Months Ended												Q1 2025 compared to Q4 2024					Q1 2025 compared to Q1 2024
	Mar 31,		Dec 31,		Sep 30,			Jun 30,			Mar 31,		Q1 2025 compared to Q4 2024					Q1 2025 compared to Q1 2024
(Dollars in thousands)		2025		2024		2024			2024			2024	$ Change			% Change		$ Change			% Change
Salaries and employee benefits:
Salaries	$	123,917	$	120,969	$	118,971		$	113,860		$	112,172	$	2,948		2	%	$	11,745		10	%
Commissions and incentive compensation		52,536		54,792		57,575			52,151			51,001		(2,256	)	(4	)		1,535		3
Benefits		35,073		36,372		34,715			32,530			32,000		(1,299	)	(4	)		3,073		10
Total salaries and employee benefits		211,526		212,133		211,261			198,541			195,173		(607	)	(0	)		16,353		8
Software and equipment		34,717		34,258		31,574			29,231			27,731		459		1			6,986		25
Operating lease equipment		10,471		10,263		10,518			10,834			10,683		208		2			(212	)	(2	)
Occupancy, net		20,778		20,597		19,945			19,585			19,086		181		1			1,692		9
Data processing		11,274		10,957		9,984			9,503			9,292		317		3			1,982		21
Advertising and marketing		12,272		13,097		18,239			17,436			13,040		(825	)	(6	)		(768	)	(6	)
Professional fees		9,044		11,334		9,783			9,967			9,553		(2,290	)	(20	)		(509	)	(5	)
Amortization of other acquisition-related intangible assets		5,618		5,773		4,042			1,122			1,158		(155	)	(3	)		4,460		NM
FDIC insurance		10,926		10,640		10,512			10,429			9,381		286		3			1,545		16
FDIC insurance – special assessment		—		—		—			—			5,156		—		—			(5,156	)	(100	)
OREO expense, net		643		397		(938	)		(259	)		392		246		62			251		64
Other:
Lending expenses, net of deferred origination costs		5,866		6,448		4,995			5,335			5,078		(582	)	(9	)		788		16
Travel and entertainment		5,270		8,140		5,364			5,340			4,597		(2,870	)	(35	)		673		15
Miscellaneous		27,685		24,502		25,408			23,289			22,825		3,183		13			4,860		21
Total other		38,821		39,090		35,767			33,964			32,500		(269	)	(1	)		6,321		19
Total Non-Interest Expense	$	366,090	$	368,539	$	360,687		$	340,353		$	333,145	$	(2,449	)	(1	)%	$	32,945		10	%

^{NM – Not meaningful.}

TABLE 17: SUPPLEMENTAL NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES/RATIOS

The accounting and reporting policies of Wintrust conform to generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) in the United States and prevailing practices in the banking industry. However, certain non-GAAP performance measures and ratios are used by management to evaluate and measure the Company’s performance. These include taxable-equivalent net interest income (including its individual components), taxable-equivalent net interest margin (including its individual components), the taxable-equivalent efficiency ratio, tangible common equity ratio, tangible book value per common share, return on average tangible common equity, and pre-tax income, excluding provision for credit losses. Management believes that these measures and ratios provide users of the Company’s financial information a more meaningful view of the performance of the Company’s interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and of the Company’s operating efficiency. Other financial holding companies may define or calculate these measures and ratios differently.

Management reviews yields on certain asset categories and the net interest margin of the Company and its banking subsidiaries on a fully taxable-equivalent basis (“FTE”). In this non-GAAP presentation, net interest income is adjusted to reflect tax-exempt interest income on an equivalent before-tax basis using tax rates effective as of the end of the period. This measure ensures comparability of net interest income arising from both taxable and tax-exempt sources. Net interest income on a FTE basis is also used in the calculation of the Company’s efficiency ratio. The efficiency ratio, which is calculated by dividing non-interest expense by total taxable-equivalent net revenue (less securities gains or losses), measures how much it costs to produce one dollar of revenue. Securities gains or losses are excluded from this calculation to better match revenue from daily operations to operational expenses. Management considers the tangible common equity ratio and tangible book value per common share as useful measurements of the Company’s equity. The Company references the return on average tangible common equity as a measurement of profitability. Management considers pre-tax income, excluding provision for credit losses, as a useful measurement of the Company’s core net income.

	Three Months Ended
	Mar 31,			Dec 31,			Sep 30,			Jun 30,			Mar 31,
(Dollars and shares in thousands)	2025			2024			2024			2024			2024
Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Net Interest Margin and Efficiency Ratio:
(A) Interest Income (GAAP)	$	886,965		$	913,501		$	908,604		$	849,979		$	805,513
Taxable-equivalent adjustment:
– Loans		2,206			2,352			2,474			2,305			2,246
– Liquidity Management Assets		690			716			668			567			550
– Other Earning Assets		3			2			2			3			5
(B) Interest Income (non-GAAP)	$	889,864		$	916,571		$	911,748		$	852,854		$	808,314
(C) Interest Expense (GAAP)		360,491			388,353			406,021			379,369			341,319
(D) Net Interest Income (GAAP) (A minus C)	$	526,474		$	525,148		$	502,583		$	470,610		$	464,194
(E) Net Interest Income (non-GAAP) (B minus C)	$	529,373		$	528,218		$	505,727		$	473,485		$	466,995
Net interest margin (GAAP)		3.54	%		3.49	%		3.49	%		3.50	%		3.57	%
Net interest margin, fully taxable-equivalent (non-GAAP)		3.56			3.51			3.51			3.52			3.59
(F) Non-interest income	$	116,634		$	113,451		$	113,147		$	121,147		$	140,580
(G) Gains (losses) on investment securities, net		3,196			(2,835	)		3,189			(4,282	)		1,326
(H) Non-interest expense		366,090			368,539			360,687			340,353			333,145
Efficiency ratio (H/(D+F-G))		57.21	%		57.46	%		58.88	%		57.10	%		55.21	%
Efficiency ratio (non-GAAP) (H/(E+F-G))		56.95			57.18			58.58			56.83			54.95
	Three Months Ended
	Mar 31,			Dec 31,			Sep 30,			Jun 30,			Mar 31,
(Dollars and shares in thousands)	2025			2024			2024			2024			2024
Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Tangible Common Equity Ratio:
Total shareholders’ equity (GAAP)	$	6,600,537		$	6,344,297		$	6,399,714		$	5,536,628		$	5,436,400
Less: Non-convertible preferred stock (GAAP)		(412,500	)		(412,500	)		(412,500	)		(412,500	)		(412,500	)
Less: Intangible assets (GAAP)		(913,004	)		(918,632	)		(924,646	)		(676,562	)		(677,911	)
(I) Total tangible common shareholders’ equity (non-GAAP)	$	5,275,033		$	5,013,165		$	5,062,568		$	4,447,566		$	4,345,989
(J) Total assets (GAAP)	$	65,870,066		$	64,879,668		$	63,788,424		$	59,781,516		$	57,576,933
Less: Intangible assets (GAAP)		(913,004	)		(918,632	)		(924,646	)		(676,562	)		(677,911	)
(K) Total tangible assets (non-GAAP)	$	64,957,062		$	63,961,036		$	62,863,778		$	59,104,954		$	56,899,022
Common equity to assets ratio (GAAP) (L/J)		9.4	%		9.1	%		9.4	%		8.6	%		8.7	%
Tangible common equity ratio (non-GAAP) (I/K)		8.1			7.8			8.1			7.5			7.6

Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Tangible Book Value per Common Share:
Total shareholders’ equity	$	6,600,537		$	6,344,297		$	6,399,714		$	5,536,628		$	5,436,400
Less: Preferred stock		(412,500	)		(412,500	)		(412,500	)		(412,500	)		(412,500	)
(L) Total common equity	$	6,188,037		$	5,931,797		$	5,987,214		$	5,124,128		$	5,023,900
(M) Actual common shares outstanding		66,919			66,495			66,482			61,760			61,737
Book value per common share (L/M)	$	92.47		$	89.21		$	90.06		$	82.97		$	81.38
Tangible book value per common share (non-GAAP) (I/M)		78.83			75.39			76.15			72.01			70.40

Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Return on Average Tangible Common Equity:
(N) Net income applicable to common shares	$	182,048		$	178,371		$	163,010		$	145,397		$	180,303
Add: Intangible asset amortization		5,618			5,773			4,042			1,122			1,158
Less: Tax effect of intangible asset amortization		(1,421	)		(1,547	)		(1,087	)		(311	)		(291	)
After-tax intangible asset amortization	$	4,197		$	4,226		$	2,955		$	811		$	867
(O) Tangible net income applicable to common shares (non-GAAP)	$	186,245		$	182,597		$	165,965		$	146,208		$	181,170
Total average shareholders’ equity	$	6,460,941		$	6,418,403		$	5,990,429		$	5,450,173		$	5,440,457
Less: Average preferred stock		(412,500	)		(412,500	)		(412,500	)		(412,500	)		(412,500	)
(P) Total average common shareholders’ equity	$	6,048,441		$	6,005,903		$	5,577,929		$	5,037,673		$	5,027,957
Less: Average intangible assets		(916,069	)		(921,438	)		(833,574	)		(677,207	)		(678,731	)
(Q) Total average tangible common shareholders’ equity (non-GAAP)	$	5,132,372		$	5,084,465		$	4,744,355		$	4,360,466		$	4,349,226
Return on average common equity, annualized (N/P)		12.21	%		11.82	%		11.63	%		11.61	%		14.42	%
Return on average tangible common equity, annualized (non-GAAP) (O/Q)		14.72			14.29			13.92			13.49			16.75

Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Pre-Tax, Pre-Provision Income:
Income before taxes	$	253,055		$	253,081		$	232,709		$	211,343		$	249,956
Add: Provision for credit losses		23,963			16,979			22,334			40,061			21,673
Pre-tax income, excluding provision for credit losses (non-GAAP)	$	277,018		$	270,060		$	255,043		$	251,404		$	271,629

WINTRUST SUBSIDIARIES

Wintrust is a financial holding company whose common stock is traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market (Nasdaq: WTFC) that operates bank retail locations in the greater Chicago, southern Wisconsin, west Michigan, northwest Indiana, and southwest Florida market areas. Its 16 community bank subsidiaries are: Barrington Bank & Trust Company, N.A., Beverly Bank & Trust Company, N.A., Crystal Lake Bank & Trust Company, N.A., Hinsdale Bank & Trust Company, N.A., Lake Forest Bank & Trust Company, N.A., Libertyville Bank & Trust Company, N.A., Macatawa Bank, N.A., Northbrook Bank & Trust Company, N.A., Old Plank Trail Community Bank, N.A., Schaumburg Bank & Trust Company, N.A., St. Charles Bank & Trust Company, N.A., State Bank of The Lakes, N.A., Town Bank, N.A., Village Bank & Trust, N.A., Wheaton Bank & Trust Company, N.A., and Wintrust Bank, N.A.

Additionally, the Company operates various non-bank businesses:

FIRST Insurance Funding and Wintrust Life Finance, each a division of Lake Forest Bank & Trust Company, N.A., serve commercial and life insurance loan customers, respectively, throughout the United States.
First Insurance Funding of Canada serves commercial insurance loan customers throughout Canada.
Tricom, Inc. of Milwaukee provides high-yielding, short-term accounts receivable financing and value-added out-sourced administrative services, such as data processing of payrolls, billing and cash management services, to temporary staffing service clients located throughout the United States.
Wintrust Mortgage, a division of Barrington Bank & Trust Company, N.A., engages primarily in the origination and purchase of residential mortgages for sale into the secondary market through origination offices located throughout the United States. Loans are also originated nationwide through relationships with wholesale and correspondent offices.
Wintrust Investments, LLC is a broker-dealer providing a full range of private client and brokerage services to clients and correspondent banks located primarily in the Midwest.
Great Lakes Advisors LLC provides money management services and advisory services to individual accounts.
Wintrust Private Trust Company, N.A., a trust subsidiary, allows Wintrust to service customers’ trust and investment needs at each banking location.
Wintrust Asset Finance offers direct leasing opportunities.
CDEC provides Qualified Intermediary services (as defined by U.S. Treasury regulations) for taxpayers seeking to structure tax-deferred like-kind exchanges under Internal Revenue Code Section 1031.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This document contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws. Forward-looking information can be identified through the use of words such as “intend,” “plan,” “project,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “contemplate,” “possible,” “will,” “may,” “should,” “would” and “could.” Forward-looking statements and information are not historical facts, are premised on many factors and assumptions, and represent only management’s expectations, estimates and projections regarding future events. Similarly, these statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict, and which may include, but are not limited to, those listed below and the Risk Factors discussed under Item 1A of the Company’s 2024 Annual Report on Form 10-K and in any of the Company’s subsequent SEC filings. The Company intends such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and is including this statement for purposes of invoking these safe harbor provisions. Such forward-looking statements may be deemed to include, among other things, statements relating to the Company’s future financial performance, the performance of its loan portfolio, the expected amount of future credit reserves and charge-offs, delinquency trends, growth plans, regulatory developments, securities that the Company may offer from time to time, and management’s long-term performance goals, as well as statements relating to the anticipated effects on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations from expected developments or events, the Company’s business and growth strategies, including future acquisitions of banks, specialty finance or wealth management businesses, internal growth and plans to form additional de novo banks or branch offices. Actual results could differ materially from those addressed in the forward-looking statements as a result of numerous factors, including the following:

economic conditions and events that affect the economy, housing prices, the job market and other factors that may adversely affect the Company’s liquidity and the performance of its loan portfolios, including an actual or threatened U.S. government debt default or rating downgrade, particularly in the markets in which it operates;
negative effects suffered by us or our customers resulting from changes in U.S. or international trade policies;
the extent of defaults and losses on the Company’s loan portfolio, which may require further increases in its allowance for credit losses;
estimates of fair value of certain of the Company’s assets and liabilities, which could change in value significantly from period to period;
the financial success and economic viability of the borrowers of our commercial loans;
commercial real estate market conditions in the Chicago metropolitan area and southern Wisconsin;
the extent of commercial and consumer delinquencies and declines in real estate values, which may require further increases in the Company’s allowance for credit losses;
inaccurate assumptions in our analytical and forecasting models used to manage our loan portfolio;
changes in the level and volatility of interest rates, the capital markets and other market indices that may affect, among other things, the Company’s liquidity and the value of its assets and liabilities;
the interest rate environment, including a prolonged period of low interest rates or rising interest rates, either broadly or for some types of instruments, which may affect the Company’s net interest income and net interest margin, and which could materially adversely affect the Company’s profitability;
competitive pressures in the financial services business which may affect the pricing of the Company’s loan and deposit products as well as its services (including wealth management services), which may result in loss of market share and reduced income from deposits, loans, advisory fees and income from other products;
failure to identify and complete favorable acquisitions in the future or unexpected losses, difficulties or developments related to the Company’s recent or future acquisitions;
unexpected difficulties and losses related to FDIC-assisted acquisitions;
harm to the Company’s reputation;
any negative perception of the Company’s financial strength;
ability of the Company to raise additional capital on acceptable terms when needed;
disruption in capital markets, which may lower fair values for the Company’s investment portfolio;
ability of the Company to use technology to provide products and services that will satisfy customer demands and create efficiencies in operations and to manage risks associated therewith;
failure or breaches of our security systems or infrastructure, or those of third parties;
security breaches, including denial of service attacks, hacking, social engineering attacks, malware intrusion and similar events or data corruption attempts and identity theft;
adverse effects on our information technology systems, or those of third parties, resulting from failures, human error or cyberattacks (including ransomware);
adverse effects of failures by our vendors to provide agreed upon services in the manner and at the cost agreed, particularly our information technology vendors;
increased costs as a result of protecting our customers from the impact of stolen debit card information;
accuracy and completeness of information the Company receives about customers and counterparties to make credit decisions;
ability of the Company to attract and retain senior management experienced in the banking and financial services industries;
environmental liability risk associated with lending activities;
the impact of any claims or legal actions to which the Company is subject, including any effect on our reputation;
losses incurred in connection with repurchases and indemnification payments related to mortgages and increases in reserves associated therewith;
the loss of customers as a result of technological changes allowing consumers to complete their financial transactions without the use of a bank;
the soundness of other financial institutions and the impact of recent failures of financial institutions, including broader financial institution liquidity risk and concerns;
the expenses and delayed returns inherent in opening new branches and de novo banks;
liabilities, potential customer loss or reputational harm related to closings of existing branches;
examinations and challenges by tax authorities, and any unanticipated impact of the Tax Act;
changes in accounting standards, rules and interpretations, and the impact on the Company’s financial statements;
the ability of the Company to receive dividends from its subsidiaries;
the impact of the Company’s transition from LIBOR to an alternative benchmark rate for current and future transactions;
a decrease in the Company’s capital ratios, including as a result of declines in the value of its loan portfolios, or otherwise;
legislative or regulatory changes, particularly changes in regulation of financial services companies and/or the products and services offered by financial services companies;
changes in laws, regulations, rules, standards and contractual obligations regarding data privacy and cybersecurity;
a lowering of our credit rating;
changes in U.S. monetary policy and changes to the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet, including changes in response to persistent inflation or otherwise;
regulatory restrictions upon our ability to market our products to consumers and limitations on our ability to profitably operate our mortgage business;
increased costs of compliance, heightened regulatory capital requirements and other risks associated with changes in regulation and the regulatory environment;
the impact of heightened capital requirements;
increases in the Company’s FDIC insurance premiums, or the collection of special assessments by the FDIC;
delinquencies or fraud with respect to the Company’s premium finance business;
credit downgrades among commercial and life insurance providers that could negatively affect the value of collateral securing the Company’s premium finance loans;
the Company’s ability to comply with covenants under its credit facility;
fluctuations in the stock market, which may have an adverse impact on the Company’s wealth management business and brokerage operation; and
widespread outages of operational, communication, or other systems, whether internal or provided by third parties, natural or other disasters (including acts of terrorism, armed hostilities and pandemics), and the effects of climate change.

Therefore, there can be no assurances that future actual results will correspond to these forward-looking statements. The reader is cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statement made by the Company. Any such statement speaks only as of the date the statement was made or as of such date that may be referenced within the statement. The Company undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect the impact of circumstances or events after the date of the press release. Persons are advised, however, to consult further disclosures management makes on related subjects in its reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and in its press releases.

CONFERENCE CALL, WEBCAST AND REPLAY

The Company will hold a conference call on Tuesday, April 22, 2025 at 9:00 a.m. (CDT) regarding first quarter 2025 earnings results. Individuals interested in participating in the call by addressing questions to management should register for the call to receive the dial-in numbers and unique PIN at the Conference Call Link included within the Company’s press release dated March 31, 2025 available at the Investor Relations, Investor News and Events, Press Releases link on its website at https://www.wintrust.com. A separate simultaneous audio-only webcast link is included within the press release referenced above. Registration for and a replay of the audio-only webcast with an accompanying slide presentation will be available at https://www.wintrust.com, Investor Relations, Investor News and Events, Presentations & Conference Calls. The text of the first quarter 2025 earnings press release will also be available on the home page of the Company’s website at https://www.wintrust.com and at the Investor Relations, Investor News and Events, Press Releases link on its website.

FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT:
Timothy S. Crane, President & Chief Executive Officer
David A. Dykstra, Vice Chairman & Chief Operating Officer
(847) 939-9000
Web site address: www.wintrust.com

The MIL Network –

April 22, 2025

MIL-OSI USA: PRESS RELEASE: President Pro Tempore John F. Kennedy Applauds Signing of Comprehensive Tort Reform Legislation

Source: US State of Georgia

ATLANTA (April 21, 2025)—Today, Governor Brian P. Kemp officially signed Senate Bills 68 and 69 into law, marking a major step forward in Georgia’s ongoing effort to balance our civil justice system and protect Georgians from abusive litigation practices. President Pro Tempore John F. Kennedy (R–Macon) carried the bills in the Senate on behalf of Governor Kemp, who named tort reform his top legislative priority for the 2025 session.

SB 68 enacts sweeping reforms to Georgia’s tort laws, including changes to negligent security liability, apportionment of fault, and damages in civil cases. Designed to protect small businesses and consumers from the burden of frivolous lawsuits, SB 68 aims to create a fairer and more balanced civil justice environment that will benefit consumers and job creators alike.

“Our goal as legislators is to preserve the well-being of Georgians everywhere, including small businesses, health care providers and working families,” said Sen. Kennedy. “SB 68 cracks down on excessive and frivolous litigation to ensure that our legal system works for those who play by the rules, not those looking to exploit it. Curbing lawsuit abuse is strong step in the right direction. These reforms will bring stability to small businesses and job creators across our state.”

SB 69, the Georgia Courts Access and Consumer Protection Act, complements SB 68 by addressing the growing influence of Third-Party Litigation Financing (TPLF). The new law requires TPLF entities to register with the state, bans foreign-affiliated financiers from operating in Georgia, and opens registration records to the public for greater transparency and accountability.

“Alongside SB 68, SB 69 specifically cracks down on predatory litigation financers who seek to take advantage of unwary Georgia consumers,” said Sen. Kennedy. “This billion-dollar industry, often backed by foreign actors, has no place in our civil justice system. With this legislation, we are upholding the integrity of Georgia’s courts and strengthening consumer protections statewide. I am thankful for the support of Governor Kemp and my Senate colleagues as we worked this session to get these measures across the finish line.”

Together, Senate Bills 68 and 69 reinforce Georgia’s status as the No. 1 state for business by establishing a more predictable, transparent and fair legal environment. Both bills received strong support from stakeholders across Georgia’s business and legal communities and represent a critical victory in the ongoing effort to make the state’s economy more resilient and competitive.

For more information about Senate Bill 68, click here. For more information about Senate Bill 69, click here.

# # # #

Sen. John F. Kennedy serves as the President Pro Tempore of the Georgia State Senate. He represents the 18th Senate District, which includes Crawford, Monroe, Peach and Upson counties, as well as portions of Bibb and Houston counties. He may be reached at (404) 656-6578 or by email at John.Kennedy@senate.ga.gov.

For all media inquiries, please reach out to SenatePressInquiries@senate.ga.gov.

MIL OSI USA News –

April 22, 2025

MIL-OSI Security: Miami Executive Pleads Guilty to Massive Fraud Scheme

Source: Office of United States Attorneys

Earlier today, in federal court in Brooklyn, Pushpesh Kumar Baid, also known as “PK Jain,” pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit wire fraud in connection with a scheme to defraud investors in Tradepay Capital LLC (Tradepay), a purported factoring company. The proceeding was held before United States Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom. When sentenced, Baid faces a maximum sentence of 20 years’ imprisonment, as well as restitution of over $35 million and forfeiture of over $2.6 million.

John J. Durham, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, and Christopher G. Raia, Assistant Director in Charge, Federal Bureau of Investigation, New York Field Office (FBI), announced the guilty plea.

“Through a complex web of shell companies, straw bank accounts, fraudulent documents, and other lies, Baid and his co-conspirators deceived their victims into investing tens of millions of dollars into a business that did not exist,” stated United States Attorney Durham. “Today’s plea demonstrates that my Office will hold accountable fraudsters like Baid who enrich themselves at their investors’ expense.”

Mr. Durham expressed his appreciation to the Internal Revenue Service, Criminal Investigations for its work on the case.

As set forth in court filings, Baid was the business head of Tradepay, which purported to be an international factoring business run by an executive team experienced in factoring invoices in particular industries and geographic regions. Factoring involves the sale of an invoice to a third party at a discount. In a factoring transaction, the seller of an invoice obtains immediate funding from the buyer of the invoice, and the buyer of the invoice makes a profit when the invoice is paid in full.

Between April 2017 and October 2019, Baid and his co-conspirators implemented a scheme to defraud investors in Tradepay by making it appear that Tradepay was a legitimate and successful business when it was, in fact, an elaborate scam. For example, the hundreds of invoices from various businesses that Tradepay purported to be factoring were fraudulent and included fake signatures for both sides of the transactions. Baid and his co-conspirators also funneled millions of dollars of investors’ funds—which they represented would be sent to Tradepay’s business partners—into a sprawling network of bank accounts that Baid controlled through shell entities and straw signatories. From those accounts, Baid and his co-conspirators spent millions of dollars on personal expenses, including cash withdrawals and purchases of luxury cars and watches. Baid even lied about his identity, concealing his real name from investors in order to obscure the fact that he was wanted for criminal offenses abroad.

Investors in Tradepay initially received payments on the invoices, which led them to contribute increasingly large sums of capital. By approximately July 2019, however, the payments on the invoices stopped, resulting in roughly $35 million in losses.

As part of his plea, Baid also admitted to defrauding investors in Luxestreet Inc., formerly known as Asset Capital Partners LLC (Luxestreet), and agreed to pay restitution to Luxestreet’s investors. Baid claimed that Luxestreet operated like a pawn shop for high end goods, including luxury watches. In reality, Luxestreet contracts were forged and the physical watches held by the company were mere knockoffs.

The government’s case is being handled by the Office’s Business and Securities Fraud Section. Assistant United States Attorneys Dylan A. Stern, Benjamin Weintraub, and Molly Delaney are in charge of the prosecution, with assistance from Paralegal Specialist Sarah Burn.

The Defendant:

Pushpesh Kumar Baid (also known as “PK Jain”)
Age: 44
Miami, Florida

E.D.N.Y. Docket No. 21-CR-367 (DC)

MIL Security OSI –

April 22, 2025

MIL-OSI: USCB Financial Holdings, Inc. Declares Quarterly Cash Dividend on Common Stock

Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

MIAMI, April 21, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — USCB Financial Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) (NASDAQ: USCB), the holding company for U.S. Century Bank, announced today that its Board of Directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.10 per share of Class A common stock, payable on June 5, 2025, to shareholders of record as of the close of business on May 15, 2025. Future dividend payments are subject to quarterly review and approval by the Board of Directors.

About USCB Financial Holdings, Inc.
USCB Financial Holdings, Inc. is the bank holding company for U.S. Century Bank. Established in 2002, U.S. Century Bank is one of the largest community banks headquartered in Miami, and one of the largest community banks in the State of Florida. U.S. Century Bank is rated 5-Stars by BauerFinancial, the nation’s leading independent bank rating firm. U.S. Century Bank offers customers a wide range of financial products and services and supports numerous community organizations, including the Greater Miami Chamber of Commerce, the South Florida Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, and ChamberSouth. For more information or to find a U.S. Century Bank banking center near you, please call (305) 715-5200 or visit www.uscentury.com.

Contacts:

Investor Relations
InvestorRelations@uscentury.com
Martha Guerra-Kattou
(305) 715-5141
MGuerra@uscentury.com

The MIL Network –

April 22, 2025

MIL-OSI: P10 Announces Appointments of Jennifer Glassman and Stephen Blewitt to Board of Directors

Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

DALLAS, April 21, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — P10, Inc. (NYSE: PX), (“P10” or the “Company”), a leading private markets solutions provider, today announced the appointment of Jennifer Glassman and Stephen Blewitt to its Board of Directors (“the Board”). Ms. Glassman will join the Board as an independent Class I director, effective April 21, 2025, and will serve on the Company’s Audit Committee. Mr. Blewitt will join the Board as an independent Class III director, effective April 21, 2025, and will serve on the Company’s Compensation Committee.

“We are thrilled to welcome these two investment industry veterans to the P10 Board,” said Luke Sarsfield, P10 Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. “Jennifer and Stephen have proven track records within the alternative asset management sector that will immediately strengthen our board. This board refreshment further enhances our governance profile as we seek to create long-term value for our investment strategies and shareholders.”

Ms. Glassman is a seasoned financial services leader and currently serves as the Chief Financial Officer of Towerbrook Capital Partners. Ms. Glassman was previously a partner and CFO at Soros Private Equity, and she also served in a variety of financial control and reporting roles for Soros Fund Management LLC. Prior to joining Soros, Ms. Glassman was a senior manager at PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP, where she worked in the Financial Services Business Assurance practice for over seven years. Ms. Glassman is a certified public accountant and earned her B.S. from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania and received her M.B.A. from Columbia Business School.

Mr. Blewitt is the co-founder of Youth.Work.Connect, a mission-based organization, founded in 2024. It was created to help high school youth from underserved communities build social capital to promote economic mobility. Previously, Mr. Blewitt served as the Chief Investment Officer (Private Markets) and Head of Private Markets at Manulife Investment Management from October 2018 to June 2023, where he was responsible for leading global investment teams across a wide range of asset classes, including private equity and credit, real estate, infrastructure, timber, and agriculture. Prior to that, Mr. Blewitt led Manulife’s private equity and credit business in the U.S. for almost 20 years. Mr. Blewitt earned his B.A. from the University of Chicago and received his M.B.A. from Boston University.

About P10
P10 is a leading multi-asset class private markets solutions provider in the alternative asset management industry. P10’s mission is to provide its investors differentiated access to a broad set of investment solutions that address their diverse investment needs within private markets. As of December 31, 2024, P10’s products have a global investor base of more than 3,800 investors across 50 states, 60 countries, and six continents, which includes some of the world’s largest pension funds, endowments, foundations, corporate pensions, and financial institutions. Visit www.p10alts.com.

P10 Investor Contact:
info@p10alts.com

P10 Media Contact:
Josh Clarkson
Taylor Donahue
pro-p10@prosek.com

The MIL Network –

April 22, 2025

MIL-Evening Report: Early voting opens in the federal election – but it brings some problems for voters and parties

Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Zareh Ghazarian, Senior Lecturer in Politics, School of Social Sciences, Monash University

More than 18 million Australians are enrolled to vote at the federal election on May 3.

A fair proportion of them – perhaps as many as half – will take advantage of early voting, which starts Tuesday April 22.

Hundreds of locations around Australia will morph into pre-polling centres for the next couple of weeks as we enter the final phase of the campaign.

Australians have enthusiastically embraced the opportunity to vote early in recent elections. But there are some risks for voters if they jump the gun too quickly. And it’s upending the way parties and other candidates organise their campaigns.

Go early

The popularity of voting early has been on an upward trajectory in recent decades.

Research shows that in 2004, for instance, over 80% of Australians waited until polling day to cast their ballots.

But at the 2022 federal election, almost half of all Australians on the electoral roll voted early.

There were variations across jurisdictions. Queensland had the highest rate of pre-poll voting at 56.6%, while Tasmanians had the lowest at just 36.8%.

The Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) was actively encouraging people to vote early due to COVID concerns. Nonetheless, the trend is unmistakable. Voters want to skip the queues on election day.

Logistical problems

Early voting has been the subject of much scrutiny, especially the length of time it is available to voters. The major political parties have expressed concern about the impact it has on campaign planning and logistics.

In its submission to a parliamentary inquiry into the conduct of the 2019 election, the Liberal Party highlighted how pre-poll voting placed “significant pressure on political parties” and their ability to provide booth workers for the entire early voting period, which was almost three weeks long.

Similarly, Labor acknowledged “significant practical implications for political parties and campaign managers”. The Greens also indicated they were in favour of limiting the pre-poll period.

Following the rise in early voting at the 2016 and 2019 elections, the Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters recommended pre-polling be restricted to a fortnight before election day.

The committee noted:

a two week period best balances the opportunity to participate in an election as a voter, with the logistic demands placed on those who participate as contestants.

The electoral laws were subsequently changed by the Morrison government in 2021.

But given Easter Monday and Anzac Day both fall within the fortnight preceding May 3, the early polling window for this election will be further reduced.

Campaign disruption

The rising popularity of early voting plays havoc with the campaign plans of all candidates.

In the past, when the overwhelming majority of voters waited for election day, it made sense for the major parties in particular to continually drip feed promises and announcements until the last day of voting.

Parties now have less time to pitch for support during the campaign. The critical window of opportunity to appeal to voters is the time between the election being called and when Australians flock to the polls at the start of early voting.

It is highly likely we have already seen all the major policies in this election, including the voter-friendly cost-of-living measures.

But the parties are in a bind, because they must continue to appeal to the significant number of voters who will be considering who to vote for right up until election day itself.

Skip the queue

While many people will be tempted to vote early, the Australian Electoral Commission’s website reminds us there are some conditions for pre-poll voting.

You can only vote early, either in person or by post, if on polling day you are:

travelling or unable to leave your workplace to vote
sick or due to give birth, or caring for someone who is
a person with a disability, or caring for someone who is
in prison serving a sentence of less than three years
prevented by religious beliefs from attending on election day
a silent elector, or reasonably fearful for your safety or wellbeing.

Aware of the temptation to pre-poll, the AEC says people who wait until election day won’t have to battle long queues. In fact, 75% of them will be in and out of the polling place in under 15 minutes.

The AEC says it’s worked out ways to minimise queuing on election day.

Voter beware

The numbers don’t lie. More and more voters are keen to participate in the democratic process before election day.

However, voting early could be a double-edged sword. It may be convenient, but there is always the risk candidates or parties could say or do something that antagonises a voter after they have cast their ballot.

As there is no way to withdraw an original vote or cast a new one if they change their minds, early voters are taking a risk.

Moreover, by voting early, people may be missing out on the sausage sizzle, the craft stands, and the bake sales that many communities hold on voting day. These election day traditions raise funds and add a special community feeling to the ultimate exercise of democracy – choosing a government.

Zareh Ghazarian does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

– ref. Early voting opens in the federal election – but it brings some problems for voters and parties – https://theconversation.com/early-voting-opens-in-the-federal-election-but-it-brings-some-problems-for-voters-and-parties-254172

MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

April 22, 2025

MIL-OSI: TrustCo Reports First Quarter 2025 Net Income of $14.3 Million From Repricing Loan Portfolio and Well-Managed Cost of Funds

Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

Executive Snapshot:

Bank-wide financial results:
- Key metrics for the first quarter 2025:
  - Net income of $14.3 million increased 17.7% compared to $12.1 million for the first quarter 2024
  - Net interest income of $40.4 million, up 10.4% from $36.6 million compared to the first quarter 2024
  - Average loans were up $104.7 million for the first quarter 2025 compared to the first quarter 2024
  - Average deposits were up $103.3 million for the first quarter 2025 compared to the first quarter 2024

Capital position and key ratios:
- Consolidated equity to assets increased to 10.85% as of March 31, 2025 from 10.51% as of March 31, 2024
- Book value per share as of March 31, 2025 was $36.16, up from $34.12 as of March 31, 2024
- Stock repurchase program announced authorizing for up to one million shares or approximately 5% of TrustCo’s current outstanding common stock

Trustco Financial Services and Wealth Management income:
- Fees increased to $2.1 million or 16.7% compared to first quarter 2024
- Assets under management increased to $1.2 billion or 17.4% compared first quarter 2024

GLENVILLE, N.Y., April 21, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) —

TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TrustCo, NASDAQ: TRST) today announced a robust start to 2025, marked by significant growth in both the loan and deposit portfolios of Trustco Bank during the first quarter of 2025 compared to the first quarter of 2024. This performance underscores the Bank’s commitment to serving its community through increased residential and commercial lending and adapting effectively to the evolving financial landscape. This resulted in first quarter 2025 net income of $14.3 million or $0.75 diluted earnings per share, compared to net income of $12.1 million or $0.64 diluted earnings per share for the first quarter 2024. Average loans increased $104.7 million or 2.1% for the first quarter 2025 over the same period in 2024. Average deposits increased $103.3 million or 1.9% for the first quarter 2025 over the same period in 2024.

Overview

Chairman, President, and CEO, Robert J. McCormick said “We are very pleased to announce today that tried and true Trustco Bank strategy has once again yielded exceptional results. We added loans at current market rates, which repriced our current loan portfolio higher, supporting long-term profitability. This was funded entirely by our own deposits, and we did so while holding the line on board rates. Despite aggressive market competition, we have favorably repriced our time deposits with the help of strong brand loyalty and digital engagement. These efforts yielded net income of $14.3 million and boosted all return metrics significantly year-over-year. Credit quality remains exceptional, with non-performing loans holding steady at a negligible 0.37%. The Bank also grew capital and thus maintains its position of strength. Based upon what we have seen in the first quarter, we anticipate that good things are likely in the future.”

Details

Average loans were up $104.7 million, or 2.1%, in the first quarter 2025 over the same period in 2024. Average residential loans and HECLs, our primary lending focus, were up $26.2 million, or 0.6%, and $61.0 million, or 17.3%, respectively, in the first quarter 2025 over the same period in 2024. Average commercial loans also increased $20.7 million, or 7.5%, in the first quarter 2025 over the same period in 2024. This uptick reflects a strong local economy and increased demand for credit. Average deposits were up $103.3 million, or 1.9%, for the first quarter 2025 over the same period in 2024, primarily as a result of an increase in time deposits, interest bearing checking accounts, and demand deposits. We believe the increase in these deposits compared to the same period in 2024 continues to indicate strong customer confidence in the Bank’s competitive deposit offerings. As we move forward, despite a complex economic environment, we believe that our strategic focus on relationship banking and solid financial practices has positioned us for continued success.

During the first quarter of 2025, the TrustCo announced a stock repurchase program of up to one million shares, or approximately 5% of TrustCo’s current outstanding shares of common stock. This repurchase initiative is part of the Bank’s broader capital management strategy and is intended to enhance shareholder value while maintaining flexibility to support future growth. As of March 31, 2025, our equity to asset ratio was 10.85%, compared to 10.51% as of March 31, 2024. Book value per share as of March 31, 2025 was $36.16, up 6.0% compared to $34.12 a year earlier.

Net interest income was $40.4 million for the first quarter 2025, an increase of $3.8 million, or 10.4%, compared to the first quarter of 2024, driven by loan growth at higher interest rates and less interest expense on deposit products, partially offset by lower investment interest income and a decrease in interest on federal funds sold and other short-term investments. The net interest margin for the first quarter 2025 was 2.64%, up 20 basis points from 2.44% in the first quarter of 2024. The yield on interest earnings assets increased to 4.13% in the first quarter of 2025, up 14 basis points from 3.99% in the first quarter of 2024. The cost of interest bearing liabilities decreased to 1.92% in the first quarter 2025, down from 1.99% in the first quarter 2024. As the Federal Reserve signals potential interest rate reductions in 2025, the Bank is proactively preparing to navigate the evolving rate environment. In this context, the Bank anticipates that a lower interest rate environment will provide opportunities to manage deposit costs more effectively, thereby supporting net interest margin. The Bank remains committed to maintaining competitive deposit offerings while ensuring financial stability and continued support for our communities’ banking needs.

Non-interest income increased to $5.0 million as compared to $4.8 million for the first quarter of 2024. This increase was primarily attributable to wealth management and financial services fees, which increased by 16.7% to $2.1 million, driven by strong client demand and higher assets under management. These revenues now represent 42.6% of non-interest income. The majority of this fee income is recurring, supported by long-term advisory relationships and a growing base of managed assets. Non-interest expense increased $1.4 million over the first quarter of 2024 due to increases in several areas of expenses.

Asset quality remains strong and has been consistent over the past twelve months. The Company recorded a provision for credit losses of $300 thousand in the first quarter of 2025, which is the result of a provision for credit losses on loans of $100 thousand, and a provision for credit losses on unfunded commitments of $200 thousand. The ratio of allowance for credit losses on loans to total loans was 0.99% and 0.98% as of March 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. The allowance for credit losses on loans was $50.6 million as of March 31, 2025, compared to $49.2 million as of March 31, 2024. Nonperforming loans (NPLs) were $18.8 million as of March 31, 2025, compared to $18.3 million as of March 31, 2024. NPLs were 0.37% of total loans as of March 31, 2025 and 2024. The coverage ratio, or allowance for credit losses on loans to NPLs, was 269.8% as of March 31, 2025, compared to 269.3% as of March 31, 2024. Nonperforming assets (NPAs) were $20.9 million as of March 31, 2025, compared to $20.6 million as of March 31, 2024.

A conference call to discuss first quarter 2025 results will be held at 9:00 a.m. Eastern Time on April 22, 2025. Those wishing to participate in the call may dial toll-free for the United States at 1-833-470-1428, and for Canada at 1-833-950-0062, Access code 048251. A replay of the call will be available for thirty days by dialing toll-free for the United States at 1-866-813-9403, Access code 486810. The call will also be audio webcast at https://events.q4inc.com/attendee/647533404,and will be available for one year.

About TrustCo Bank Corp NY

TrustCo Bank Corp NY is a $6.3 billion savings and loan holding company and through its subsidiary, Trustco Bank, operated 136 offices in New York, New Jersey, Vermont, Massachusetts, and Florida as of March 31, 2025.

In addition, the Bank’s Wealth Management Department offers a full range of investment services, retirement planning and trust and estate administration services. The common shares of TrustCo are traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol TRST.

Forward-Looking Statements

All statements in this news release that are not historical are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements can be identified by words such as “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “goal,” “seek,” “believe,” “project,” “estimate,” “expect,” “strategy,” “future,” “likely,” “may,” “should,” “will” and similar references to future development, results or periods. Examples of forward-looking statements include, among others, statements we make regarding our expectations for our future performance, including our expectations regarding the effects of the economic environment on our financial results, our ability to retain customers and the amount of customers’ business, including deposit balances, with us, the impact of the Federal Reserve’s actions regarding interest rates, and the anticipated effects of our capital management strategy, including our stock repurchase program. Forward-looking statements are based on management’s current expectations as well as certain assumptions and estimates made by, and information available to, management at the time the statements are made. Such forward-looking statements are subject to factors and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially for TrustCo from the views, beliefs and projections expressed in such statements, and many of the risks and uncertainties are heightened by or may, in the future, be heightened by volatility in financial markets and macroeconomic or geopolitical concerns related to inflation, changes in United States and foreign trade policy, continued elevated interest rates and ongoing armed conflicts (including the Russia/Ukraine conflict and the conflict in Israel and surrounding areas). TrustCo wishes to caution readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. The following important factors, among others, in some cases have affected and in the future could affect TrustCo’s actual results and could cause TrustCo’s actual financial performance to differ materially from that expressed in any forward-looking statement: future changes in interest rates; external economic factors, such as changes in monetary policy, ongoing inflationary pressures and continued elevated prices; exposure to credit risk in our lending activities; our increasing commercial loan portfolio; the sufficiency of our allowance for credit losses on loans to cover actual loan losses; our ability to meet the cash flow requirements of our depositors or borrowers or meet our operating cash needs to fund corporate expansion and other activities; claims and litigation pertaining to fiduciary responsibility and lender liability; the enforcement of federal cannabis laws and regulations and its impact on our ability to provide services in the cannabis industry; our dependency upon the services of the management team; our disclosure controls and procedures’ ability to prevent or detect errors or acts of fraud; the adequacy of our business continuity and disaster recovery plans; the effectiveness of our risk management framework; the impact of any expansion by us into new lines of business or new products and services; an increase in the prevalence of fraud and other financial crimes; the impact of severe weather events and climate change on us and the communities we serve, including societal responses to climate change; environmental, social and governance risks, as well as diversity, equity, and inclusion-related risks, and their impact on our reputation and relationships; the chance of a prolonged economic downturn, especially one affecting our geographic market area; instability in global economic conditions and geopolitical matters, as well as volatility in financial markets; the soundness of other financial institutions; U.S. government shutdowns, credit rating downgrades, or failure to increase the debt ceiling; fluctuations in the trust wealth management fees we receive as a result of investment performance; the impact of regulatory capital rules on our growth; changes in laws and regulations, including changes in cybersecurity or privacy regulations; restrictions on data collection and use; our compliance with the USA PATRIOT Act, Bank Secrecy Act, and other laws and regulations that could result in material fines or sanctions; changes in tax laws; limitations on our ability to pay dividends; TrustCo Realty Corp.’s ability to qualify as a real estate investment trust; changes in accounting standards; competition within our market areas; consumers and businesses’ use of non-banks to complete financial transactions; our reliance on third-party service providers; the impact of data breaches and cyber-attacks; the development and use of artificial intelligence; the impact of a failure in or breach of our operational or security systems or infrastructure, or those of third parties; the impact of an unauthorized disclosure of sensitive or confidential client or customer information; the impact of interruptions in the effective operation of our computer systems; the impact of anti-takeover provisions in our organizational documents; the impact of the manner in which we allocate capital; and other risks and uncertainties under the heading “Risk Factors” in our most recent annual report on Form 10-K and, if any, in our subsequent quarterly reports on Form 10-Q or other securities filings, as well as our upcoming quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the first quarter of 2025. The forward-looking statements contained in this news release represent TrustCo management’s judgment as of the date of this news release. TrustCo disclaims, however, any intent or obligation to update forward-looking statements, either as a result of future developments, new information or otherwise, except as may be required by law.

TRUSTCO BANK CORP NY
GLENVILLE, NY

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
	Three months ended
	3/31/2025			12/31/2024			3/31/2024
Summary of operations
Net interest income	$	40,373		$	38,902		$	36,578
Provision for credit losses		300			400			600
Noninterest income		4,974			4,409			4,843
Noninterest expense		26,329			28,165			24,903
Net income		14,275			11,281			12,126

Per share
Net income per share:
– Basic	$	0.75		$	0.59		$	0.64
– Diluted		0.75			0.59			0.64
Cash dividends		0.36			0.36			0.36
Book value at period end		36.16			35.56			34.12
Market price at period end		30.48			33.31			28.16

At period end
Full time equivalent employees		740			737			761
Full service banking offices		136			136			140

Performance ratios
Return on average assets		0.93	%		0.73	%		0.80	%
Return on average equity		8.49			6.70			7.54
Efficiency ratio (GAAP)		58.06			65.03			59.94
Adjusted Efficiency ratio (1)		58.00			63.93			59.94
Net interest spread		2.21			2.15			2.00
Net interest margin		2.64			2.60			2.44
Dividend payout ratio	47.97				60.70			56.48

Capital ratios at period end
Consolidated equity to assets		10.85	%		10.84	%		10.51	%
Consolidated tangible equity to tangible assets (1)		10.84	%		10.83	%		10.50	%

Asset quality analysis at period end
Nonperforming loans to total loans		0.37	%		0.37	%		0.37	%
Nonperforming assets to total assets		0.33			0.34			0.33
Allowance for credit losses on loans to total loans		0.99			0.99			0.98
Coverage ratio (2)	2.7x			2.7x			2.7x


(1) Non-GAAP Financial Measure, see Non-GAAP Financial Measures Reconciliation.
(2) Calculated as allowance for credit losses on loans divided by total nonperforming loans.


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
	Three months ended
	3/31/2025		12/31/2024		9/30/2024		6/30/2024		3/31/2024
Interest and dividend income:
Interest and fees on loans	$	53,450	$	53,024	$	52,112	$	50,660	$	49,804
Interest and dividends on securities available for sale:
U. S. government sponsored enterprises		596		680		718		909		906
State and political subdivisions		–		–		–		1		–
Mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage
obligations – residential		1,483		1,418		1,397		1,451		1,494
Corporate bonds		260		358		361		362		476
Small Business Administration – guaranteed
participation securities		81		84		90		94		100
Other securities		7		6		2		2		3
Total interest and dividends on securities available for sale		2,427		2,546		2,568		2,819		2,979

Interest on held to maturity securities:
obligations – residential		57		59		62		65		68
Total interest on held to maturity securities		57		59		62		65		68

Federal Home Loan Bank stock		151		152		153		147		152

Interest on federal funds sold and other short-term investments		6,732		6,128		6,174		6,894		6,750
Total interest income		62,817		61,909		61,069		60,585		59,753

Interest expense:
Interest on deposits:
Interest-bearing checking		558		397		311		288		240
Savings		734		719		770		675		712
Money market deposit accounts		1,989		2,024		2,154		2,228		2,342
Time deposits		18,983		19,680		18,969		19,400		19,677
Interest on short-term borrowings		180		187		194		206		204
Total interest expense		22,444		23,007		22,398		22,797		23,175

Net interest income		40,373		38,902		38,671		37,788		36,578

Less: Provision for credit losses		300		400		500		500		600
Net interest income after provision for credit losses		40,073		38,502		38,171		37,288		35,978

Noninterest income:
Trustco Financial Services income		2,120		1,778		2,044		1,609		1,816
Fees for services to customers		2,645		2,226		2,482		2,399		2,745
Net gains on equity securities		–		–		23		1,360		–
Other		209		405		382		283		282
Total noninterest income		4,974		4,409		4,931		5,651		4,843

Noninterest expenses:
Salaries and employee benefits		11,894		12,068		12,134		12,520		11,427
Net occupancy expense		4,554		4,563		4,271		4,375		4,611
Equipment expense		1,944		2,404		1,757		1,990		1,738
Professional services		1,726		1,782		1,863		1,570		1,460
Outsourced services		2,700		3,051		2,551		2,755		2,501
Advertising expense		361		590		339		466		408
FDIC and other insurance		1,188		1,113		1,112		797		1,094
Other real estate expense, net		28		476		204		16		74
Other		1,934		2,118		1,969		1,970		1,590
Total noninterest expenses		26,329		28,165		26,200		26,459		24,903

Income before taxes		18,718		14,746		16,902		16,480		15,918
Income taxes		4,443		3,465		4,027		3,929		3,792

Net income	$	14,275	$	11,281	$	12,875	$	12,551	$	12,126

Net income per common share:
– Basic	$	0.75	$	0.59	$	0.68	$	0.66	$	0.64

– Diluted		0.75		0.59		0.68		0.66		0.64

Average basic shares (in thousands)		19,020		19,015		19,010		19,022		19,024
Average diluted shares (in thousands)		19,044		19,045		19,036		19,033		19,032


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

(dollars in thousands)
(Unaudited)
	3/31/2025			12/31/2024			9/30/2024			6/30/3024				3/31/2024
ASSETS:

Cash and due from banks	$	48,782		$	47,364		$	49,659		$	42,193		$	44,868
Federal funds sold and other short term investments		707,355			594,448			473,306			493,920			564,815
Total cash and cash equivalents		756,137			641,812			522,965			536,113			609,683

Securities available for sale:
U. S. government sponsored enterprises		65,942			85,617			90,588			106,796			128,854
States and political subdivisions		18			18			26			26			26
Mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage
obligations – residential		219,333			213,128			222,841			218,311			227,078
Small Business Administration – guaranteed
participation securities		13,683			14,141			15,171			15,592			16,260
Corporate bonds		24,779			44,581			54,327			53,764			53,341
Other securities		698			700			701			688			682
Total securities available for sale		324,453			358,185			383,654			395,177			426,241

Held to maturity securities:
Mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage
obligations-residential		5,090			5,365			5,636			5,921			6,206
Total held to maturity securities		5,090			5,365			5,636			5,921			6,206

Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank stock		6,507			6,507			6,507			6,507			6,203

Loans:
Commercial		302,753			286,857			280,261			282,441			279,092
Residential mortgage loans		4,380,561			4,388,302			4,382,674			4,370,640			4,354,369
Home equity line of credit		419,806			409,261			393,418			370,063			355,879
Installment loans		13,017			13,638			14,503			15,168			16,166
Loans, net of deferred net costs		5,116,137			5,098,058			5,070,856			5,038,312			5,005,506

Less: Allowance for credit losses on loans		50,606			50,248			49,950			49,772			49,220
Net loans		5,065,531			5,047,810			5,020,906			4,988,540			4,956,286

Bank premises and equipment, net		37,178			33,782			33,324			33,466			33,423
Operating lease right-of-use assets		34,968			36,627			37,958			38,376			39,647
Other assets		108,681			108,656			98,730			102,544			101,881

Total assets	$	6,338,545		$	6,238,744		$	6,109,680		$	6,106,644		$	6,179,570

LIABILITIES:
Deposits:
Demand	$	793,306		$	762,101		$	753,878		$	745,227		$	742,997
Interest-bearing checking		1,067,948			1,027,540			988,527			1,029,606			1,020,136
Savings accounts		1,094,968			1,086,534			1,092,038			1,144,427			1,155,517
Money market deposit accounts		478,872			465,049			477,113			517,445			532,611
Time deposits		2,061,576			2,049,759			1,952,635			1,840,262			1,903,908
Total deposits		5,496,670			5,390,983			5,264,191			5,276,967			5,355,169

Short-term borrowings		82,275			84,781			91,450			89,720			94,374
Operating lease liabilities		38,324			40,159			41,469			42,026			43,438
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		33,468			46,478			43,549			42,763			37,399

Total liabilities		5,650,737			5,562,401			5,440,659			5,451,476			5,530,380

SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
Capital stock		20,097			20,097			20,058			20,058			20,058
Surplus		259,182			258,874			257,644			257,490			257,335
Undivided profits		453,931			446,503			442,079			436,048			430,346
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax		(132	)		(3,861	)		(6,600	)		(14,268	)		(14,763	)
Treasury stock at cost		(45,270	)		(45,270	)		(44,160	)		(44,160	)		(43,786	)

Total shareholders’ equity		687,808			676,343			669,021			655,168			649,190

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	6,338,545		$	6,238,744		$	6,109,680		$	6,106,644		$	6,179,570

Outstanding shares (in thousands)		19,020			19,020			19,010			19,010			19,024

NONPERFORMING ASSETS

(dollars in thousands)
(Unaudited)
	3/31/2025			12/31/2024			9/30/2024			6/30/2024			3/31/2024
Nonperforming Assets

New York and other states*
Loans in nonaccrual status:
Commercial	$	688		$	343		$	466		$	741		$	532
Real estate mortgage – 1 to 4 family		14,795			14,671			15,320			14,992			14,359
Installment		139			108			163			131			149
Total non-accrual loans		15,622			15,122			15,949			15,864			15,040
Other nonperforming real estate mortgages – 1 to 4 family		–			–			–			–			–
Total nonperforming loans		15,622			15,122			15,949			15,864			15,040
Other real estate owned		2,107			2,175			2,503			2,334			2,334
Total nonperforming assets	$	17,729		$	17,297		$	18,452		$	18,198		$	17,374

Florida
Loans in nonaccrual status:
Commercial	$	–		$	–		$	314		$	314		$	314
Real estate mortgage – 1 to 4 family		3,135			3,656			3,176			2,985			2,921
Installment		3			22			5			22			–
Total non-accrual loans		3,138			3,678			3,495			3,321			3,235
Other nonperforming real estate mortgages – 1 to 4 family		–			–			–			–			–
Total nonperforming loans		3,138			3,678			3,495			3,321			3,235
Other real estate owned		–			–			–			–			–
Total nonperforming assets	$	3,138		$	3,678		$	3,495		$	3,321		$	3,235

Total
Loans in nonaccrual status:
Commercial	$	688		$	343		$	780		$	1,055		$	846
Real estate mortgage – 1 to 4 family		17,930			18,327			18,496			17,977			17,280
Installment		142			130			168			153			149
Total non-accrual loans		18,760			18,800			19,444			19,185			18,275
Other nonperforming real estate mortgages – 1 to 4 family		–			–			–			–			–
Total nonperforming loans		18,760			18,800			19,444			19,185			18,275
Other real estate owned		2,107			2,175			2,503			2,334			2,334
Total nonperforming assets	$	20,867		$	20,975		$	21,947		$	21,519		$	20,609


Quarterly Net (Recoveries) Chargeoffs

New York and other states*
Commercial	$	(3	)	$	62		$	65		$	–		$	–
Real estate mortgage – 1 to 4 family		41			(316	)		104			(74	)		(78	)
Installment		4			41			11			(2	)		36
Total net chargeoffs (recoveries)	$	42		$	(213	)	$	180		$	(76	)	$	(42	)

Florida
Commercial	$	(315	)	$	314		$	–		$	–		$	–
Real estate mortgage – 1 to 4 family		–			–			–			17			–
Installment		15			1			42			7			–
Total net (recoveries) chargeoffs	$	(300	)	$	315		$	42		$	24		$	–

Total
Commercial	$	(318	)	$	376		$	65		$	–		$	–
Real estate mortgage – 1 to 4 family		41			(316	)		104			(57	)		(78	)
Installment		19			42			53			5			36
Total net (recoveries) chargeoffs	$	(258	)	$	102		$	222		$	(52	)	$	(42	)


Asset Quality Ratios

Total nonperforming loans (1)	$	18,760		$	18,800		$	19,444		$	19,185		$	18,275
Total nonperforming assets (1)		20,867			20,975			21,947			21,519			20,609
Total net (recoveries) chargeoffs (2)		(258	)		102			222			(52	)		(42	)

Allowance for credit losses on loans (1)		50,606			50,248			49,950			49,772			49,220

Nonperforming loans to total loans		0.37	%		0.37	%		0.38	%		0.38	%		0.37	%
Nonperforming assets to total assets		0.33	%		0.34	%		0.36	%		0.35	%		0.33	%
Allowance for credit losses on loans to total loans		0.99	%		0.99	%		0.99	%		0.99	%		0.98	%
Coverage ratio (1)		269.8	%		267.3	%		256.9	%		259.4	%		269.3	%
Annualized net (recoveries) chargeoffs to average loans (2)		-0.02	%		0.01	%		0.02	%		0.00	%		0.00	%
Allowance for credit losses on loans to annualized net chargeoffs (2)		N/A			123.2x			56.3x			N/A			N/A

* Includes New York, New Jersey, Vermont and Massachusetts.
(1) At period-end
(2) For the three-month period ended

DISTRIBUTION OF ASSETS, LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY –
INTEREST RATES AND INTEREST DIFFERENTIAL

(dollars in thousands)
(Unaudited)	Three months ended							Three months ended
	March 31, 2025							March 31, 2024
	Average			Interest		Average		Average			Interest		Average
	Balance					Rate		Balance					Rate
Assets

Securities available for sale:
U. S. government sponsored enterprises	$	74,680		$	596	3.19	%	$	125,973		$	906	2.88	%
Mortgage backed securities and collateralized mortgage
obligations – residential		239,509			1,483	2.46			258,814			1,494	2.30
State and political subdivisions		18			–	6.77			26			0	6.90
Corporate bonds		40,019			260	2.60			73,625			476	2.59
Small Business Administration – guaranteed
participation securities		15,003			81	2.15			18,224			100	2.20
Other		699			7	4.01			696			3	1.72

Total securities available for sale		369,928			2,427	2.62			477,358			2,979	2.50

Federal funds sold and other short-term Investments		613,646			6,732	4.45			497,652			6,750	5.45

Held to maturity securities:
Mortgage backed securities and collateralized mortgage
obligations – residential		5,233			57	4.34			6,329			68	4.30

Total held to maturity securities		5,233			57	4.34			6,329			68	4.30

Federal Home Loan Bank stock		6,507			151	9.28			6,203			152	9.80

Commercial loans		297,926			4,165	5.59			277,183			3,661	5.28
Residential mortgage loans		4,385,646			42,614	3.89			4,359,476			40,415	3.71
Home equity lines of credit		413,981			6,435	6.30			353,004			5,464	6.22
Installment loans		12,967			236	7.37			16,128			264	6.58

Loans, net of unearned income		5,110,520			53,450	4.19			5,005,791			49,804	3.98

Total interest earning assets		6,105,834		$	62,817	4.13			5,993,333		$	59,753	3.99

Allowance for credit losses on loans		(50,475	)						(48,824	)
Cash & non-interest earning assets		201,154							185,230


Total assets	$	6,256,513						$	6,129,739


Liabilities and shareholders’ equity

Deposits:
Interest bearing checking accounts	$	1,038,218		$	558	0.22	%	$	990,130		$	240	0.10	%
Money market accounts		469,070			1,989	1.72			544,687			2,342	1.73
Savings		1,089,358			734	0.27			1,158,558			712	0.25
Time deposits		2,054,494			18,984	3.75			1,889,929			19,677	4.19

Total interest bearing deposits		4,651,140			22,265	1.94			4,583,304			22,971	2.02
Short-term borrowings		83,207			180	0.88			93,316			204	0.88

Total interest bearing liabilities		4,734,347		$	22,445	1.92			4,676,620		$	23,175	1.99

Demand deposits		761,800							726,299
Other liabilities		78,748							80,158
Shareholders’ equity		681,618							646,662

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	6,256,513						$	6,129,739

Net interest income				$	40,372						$	36,578

Net interest spread						2.21	%						2.00	%


Net interest margin (net interest income to
total interest earning assets)						2.64	%						2.44	%

Non-GAAP Financial Measures Reconciliation

Tangible book value per share is a non-GAAP financial measure derived from GAAP-based amounts. We calculate tangible book value by excluding the balance of intangible assets from total shareholders’ equity divided by shares outstanding. We believe that this is consistent with the treatment by bank regulatory agencies, which exclude intangible assets from the calculation of risk-based capital ratios. Additionally, we believe that this measure is important to many investors in the marketplace who are interested in relative changes from period to period in equity exclusive of changes in intangible assets.

Tangible equity as a percentage of tangible assets at period end is a non-GAAP financial measure derived from GAAP-based amounts. We calculate tangible equity and tangible assets by excluding the balance of intangible assets from total shareholders’ equity and total assets, respectively. We calculate tangible equity as a percentage of tangible assets at period end by dividing tangible equity by tangible assets at period end. We believe that this is consistent with the treatment by bank regulatory agencies, which exclude intangible assets from the calculation of risk-based capital ratios. Additionally, we believe that this measure is important to many investors in the marketplace who are interested in relative changes from period to period in equity and total assets, each exclusive of changes in intangible assets.

Adjusted efficiency ratio is a non-GAAP measures of expense control relative to revenue from net interest income and non-interest fee income. We calculate the efficiency ratio by dividing total non-interest expense by the sum of net interest income and total non-interest income. We calculate the adjusted efficiency ratio by dividing total noninterest expenses as determined under GAAP, excluding other real estate expense, net, by net interest income and total noninterest income as determined under GAAP. We believe that this provides a reasonable measure of primary banking expenses relative to primary banking revenue. Additionally, we believe this measure is important to investors looking for a measure of efficiency in our productivity measured by the amount of revenue generated for each dollar spent.

We believe that these non-GAAP financial measures provide information that is important to investors and that is useful in understanding our financial results. Our management internally assesses our performance based, in part, on these measures. However, these non-GAAP financial measures are supplemental and not a substitute for an analysis based on GAAP measures. As other companies may use different calculations for these measures, this presentation may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures reported by other companies. A reconciliation of the non-GAAP measures of tangible book value to shares outstanding, tangible equity as a percentage of tangible assets, and efficiency ratio to the most directly comparable GAAP measures is set forth below.

NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES RECONCILIATION

(dollars in thousands)
(Unaudited)
		3/31/2025			12/31/2024			3/31/2024
Tangible Book Value Per Share

Equity (GAAP)		$	687,808		$	676,343		$	649,190
Less: Intangible assets			553			553			553
Tangible equity (Non-GAAP)		$	687,255		$	675,790		$	648,637

Shares outstanding			19,020			19,020			19,024
Tangible book value per share			36.13			35.53			34.10
Book value per share			36.16			35.56			34.12

Tangible Equity to Tangible Assets
Total Assets (GAAP)		$	6,338,545		$	6,238,744		$	6,179,570
Less: Intangible assets			553			553			553
Tangible assets (Non-GAAP)		$	6,337,992		$	6,238,191		$	6,179,017

Equity to Assets (GAAP)			10.85	%		10.84	%		10.51	%
Tangible Equity to Tangible Assets (Non-GAAP)			10.84	%		10.83	%		10.50	%

		Three months ended
Efficiency and Adjusted Efficiency Ratios		3/31/2025			12/31/2024			3/31/2024

Net interest income (GAAP)	A	$	40,373		$	38,902		$	36,578
Non-interest income (GAAP)	B		4,974			4,409			4,843
Revenue used for efficiency ratio (GAAP)	C	$	45,347		$	43,311		$	41,421

Total noninterest expense (GAAP)	D	$	26,329		$	28,165		$	24,903
Less: Other real estate expense, net	E		28			476			74
Expense used for efficiency ratio (Non-GAAP)	F	$	26,301		$	27,689		$	24,829

Efficiency Ratio (GAAP)	D/C		58.06	%		65.03	%		59.94	%
Adjusted Efficiency Ratio (Non-GAAP)	F/C		58.00	%		63.93	%		59.94	%

Subsidiary:		Trustco Bank

Contact:		Robert Leonard
		Executive Vice President
		(518) 381-3693

The MIL Network –

April 22, 2025

MIL-OSI: Capital Southwest Announces Receipt of Second SBIC License

Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

DALLAS, April 21, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Capital Southwest Corporation (“Capital Southwest”) (Nasdaq: CSWC), an internally managed business development company focused on providing flexible financing solutions to support the acquisition and growth of middle market businesses, today announced its wholly owned subsidiary, Capital Southwest SBIC II, LP (“SBIC II”), has received a license from the U.S. Small Business Administration (“SBA”) to operate as a Small Business Investment Company (“SBIC”).

As an SBIC, SBIC II will be subject to a variety of regulations and oversight by the SBA concerning, among other things, the size and nature of the companies in which it may invest as well as the structure of those investments. The SBIC license will allow SBIC II to obtain leverage by issuing SBA-guaranteed debentures, subject to the issuance of a leverage commitment by the SBA. SBA debentures are loans issued to an SBIC which have interest payable semi-annually and a ten-year maturity. The interest rate is fixed shortly after issuance at a market-driven spread over U.S. Treasury Notes with ten-year maturities. Current SBA regulations permit SBIC II to borrow up to $175 million in SBA-guaranteed debentures, bringing Capital Southwest’s aggregate borrowing capacity through the SBIC program to a total of up to $350 million of capital.

The SBA program has played a pivotal role within Capital Southwest’s lower middle market investment strategy since receiving its first SBIC license in April 2021. Capital Southwest received exemptive relief from the Securities and Exchange Commission that allows for the exclusion of SBA-guaranteed debentures from the definition of senior securities in the asset coverage requirement applicable to the Company.

About Capital Southwest

Capital Southwest Corporation (Nasdaq: CSWC) is a Dallas, Texas-based, internally managed business development company with approximately $1.7 billion in investments at fair value as of December 31, 2024. Capital Southwest is a middle market lending firm focused on supporting the acquisition and growth of middle market businesses with $5 million to $50 million investments across the capital structure, including first lien, second lien and non-control equity co-investments. As a public company with a permanent capital base, Capital Southwest has the flexibility to be creative in its financing solutions and to invest to support the growth of its portfolio companies over long periods of time.

Investor Relations Contact:

Michael S. Sarner, President and Chief Executive Officer
214-884-3829

The MIL Network –

April 22, 2025

MIL-OSI: Climb Global Solutions Appoints Paul Giovacchini to its Board of Directors

Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

EATONTOWN, N.J., April 21, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Climb Global Solutions, Inc. (NASDAQ:CLMB) (“Climb” or the “Company”), a value-added global IT channel company providing unique sales and distribution solutions for innovative technology vendors, today announced that the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) has elected Paul Giovacchini to the Board. With the election of Mr. Giovacchini, Climb’s Board increased to seven total members, six of whom are independent under the Nasdaq listing standards.

Mr. Giovacchini brings over 30 years of experience in private equity, corporate governance, and board leadership across public and private companies. He currently serves as the Lead Independent Director of TPI Composites, Inc. (NASDAQ:TPIC), where he previously served as Chairman and helped lead the company’s transformation into a global public enterprise. Mr. Giovacchini also serves as an independent consulting advisor to Advantage Capital Management, supporting private equity and debt investment strategies. Mr. Giovacchini holds a B.A. in Economics from Stanford University and an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School.

“Paul brings a wealth of executive leadership, investment expertise, and operational insight to our Board,” said John McCarthy, Chairman of the Board. “His extensive experience across public and private enterprises, coupled with his strong financial background, will be invaluable as we continue to strengthen our operational foundation and advance our organic and inorganic growth initiatives.”

Mr. Giovacchini stated, “Climb has built an impressive platform in the global IT channel, distinguished by its strong partnerships and consistent execution. As the Company enters its next chapter of growth, I’m honored to join the Board and contribute to its continued success. I look forward to leveraging my experience in governance, finance, and global expansion to support Climb’s long-term vision both domestically and abroad.”

About Climb Global Solutions

Climb Global Solutions, Inc. (NASDAQ:CLMB) is a value-added global IT distribution and solutions company specializing in emerging and innovative technologies. Climb operates across the US, Canada and Europe through multiple business units, including Climb Channel Solutions, Grey Matter and Climb Global Services. The Company provides IT distribution and solutions for companies in the Security, Data Management, Connectivity, Storage & HCI, Virtualization & Cloud, and Software & ALM industries.

Additional information can be found by visiting www.climbglobalsolutions.com.

Forward-Looking Statements

The statements in this release, other than statements of historical fact, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are intended to come within the safe harbor protection provided by those sections. These forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties. Many of the forward-looking statements may be identified by words such as ”look forward,” “believes,” “expects,” “intends,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “estimates,” “projects,” “forecasts,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “will,” “confident,” “may,” “can,” “potential,” “possible,” “proposed,” “in process,” “under construction,” “in development,” “opportunity,” “target,” “outlook,” “maintain,” “continue,” “goal,” “aim,” “commit,” or similar expressions, or when we discuss our priorities, strategy, goals, vision, mission, opportunities, projections, intentions or expectations. In this press release, the forward-looking statements relate to, among other things, declaring and reaffirming our strategic goals, future operating results, and the effects and potential benefits of the strategic acquisition on our business. Factors, among others, that could cause actual results and events to differ materially from those described in any forward-looking statements include, without limitation, statements concerning our plans and expectations in connection with the addition to the Board and other plans and expectations. The forward-looking statements contained herein are also subject generally to other risks and uncertainties that are described in the section entitled “Risk Factors” contained in Item 1A. of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, and from time to time in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Company Contact

Matthew Sullivan
Chief Financial Officer
(732) 847-2451
MatthewS@ClimbCS.com

Investor Relations Contact

Sean Mansouri, CFA or Aaron D’Souza
Elevate IR
(720) 330-2829
CLMB@elevate-ir.com

The MIL Network –

April 22, 2025

MIL-OSI USA: SCHUMER: SAVE OUR SMALL BUSINESSES FROM TRUMP’S TARIFF WAR; STANDING AT ALBANY’S YONO’S RESTAURANT WITH CAPITAL REGION BUSINESSES THAT ARE SEEING MAJOR PRICE INCREASES HURTING FAMILIES & LOCAL JOBS,…

US Senate News:

Source: United States Senator for New York Charles E Schumer
Albany’s Renowned Yono’s Restaurant Is In Panic Over Trump’s Tariffs That Threaten Their Business, And Small Businesses & Manufacturers In Capital Region Like Latham Pool Are Already Seeing Costs Spike From Trade War With Canada
Senator Says 14,000 NY-ers In The Capital Region Work In Industries Directly Impacted By Tariffs, And Albany Families Could See Prices Rise Nearly $5,000 More A Year
Schumer: We Need To Save Our Restaurants & Small Businesses From Trump’s Tariff War That Is Raising Prices And Killing Jobs
To kickstart National Cost of Living Week of Action, with Trump’s tariff war hammering Albany’s restaurants and small businesses, U.S. Senator Chuck Schumer today stood at Albany’s renowned Yono’s Restaurant with Capital Region small business leaders who are feeling major hits to their bottom line due to tariffs. The senator said this chaotic, self-destructive tariff war has Upstate NY restaurants, local businesses, and working- and middle-class families footing the bill, with the average family in the Capital Region estimated to be hit with nearly $5,000 in higher prices per year.
Schumer said every day this chaos continues it risks more than 14,000 jobs in the Capital Region in industries impacted by the tariffs and even more jobs in Upstate NY’s vital recreation and tourism industries. Schumer said enough is enough, and announced that when the Senate returns he will force a vote to end Trump’s trade war.
“Albany and the Capital Region are on the frontlines of Trump’s destructive tariff war. Let’s be clear: these tariffs are a tax increase on Upstate NY. Family restaurants are the heart and soul of the Capital Region and the backbone of Main Streets across Upstate New York. They are still recovering from the pandemic. They can’t afford to eat price increases when Trump slaps them with tariffs and neither can their customers. Small businesses and manufacturers have already seen costs skyrocket, and some are being hit with a double whammy as tourism & business from Canada dries up from Trump’s actions. No small business or restaurant in Upstate NY or anywhere in America can operate with this kind of uncertainty,” said Senator Schumer. “We need to save our restaurants & small businesses from Trump’s tariff war. That’s why when the Senate returns, I will force a vote to end this reckless trade war. This is a vital ingredient to protect restaurants and families throughout the Capital Region and across Upstate New York.”
Schumer explained Capital Region restaurants were already hit hard by the pandemic and many are still trying to recover. Schumer explained that restaurants operate on some of the slimmest margins – typically 3 to 5 percent – which could shrink more as tariffs go into effect. Since ingredients are perishable, restaurants don’t have the option of stockpiling materials and they can’t change suppliers on a whim. With the threat of tariffs looming, prices across the board have increased and restaurant owners are worried that customers can’t afford to go out to eat anymore. Without business, they might not be able to recover and would be forced to lay off staff, or worse, close their doors.
A New York Times analysis found that over 14,000 New Yorkers across the Capital Region including 4,400 in Albany County work in industries targeted by Trump’s tariffs, which does not even account for all the related jobs, including in the tourism and recreation industries, that are also being impacted by the damage of this trade war. According to the Main Street Alliance, a network of small businesses, 81.5% of small business respondents to a recent survey indicated they would raise prices for consumers due to tariffs and 31.5% indicated they would lay off employees as a result of the increased costs from tariffs.
The tariffs are also creating uncertainty for families and jobs and are expected to increase costs for the average American family by nearly $5,000 a year, while families are struggling to plan for the future without assurances about their jobs.
Yono’s Restaurant has Indonesian influences and relies on spices and fruits that are not widely produced domestically, such as coconut milk, lemongrass, kaffir lime leaves, palm sugar, chilies, and galangal. Without knowing how much they will cost, it is impossible for Yono’s to plan its menu, which they often shift seasonally, and now they do not know which products they can maintain a consistent, affordable supply of. In addition, as the market has shifted to more takeout and delivery options, Yono’s has relied on imported containers and bags that are already more expensive and could get more expensive with tariffs in effect.
The senator said unpredictability makes it difficult for local restaurants to plan for tomorrow, especially when they are already operating on such small margins. For example, when asked about catering orders, owners aren’t sure how to quote orders and are faced with the option of facing sky-high prices when planned events roll around, or even needing to turn down customers. These added challenges make it more difficult for small restaurants to survive against larger chain restaurants.
“Here at Yono’s we support an immense amount of USA grown meats, vegetables, cheeses, beer, spirits and wine. However our guests appreciate a broad amount of options. We use coconut milk, lemongrass, kaffir lime leaves, palm sugar, chilies, galangal, and pandan. These items are not able to be grown in the USA, let alone in the amounts we need. We also import lamb from New Zealand and Australia. Of course, he biggest items imported that affect us will be coffee (99.5% of the coffee consumed in the USA is imported). We can only grow coffee in Hawaii in this county. Even our fine wine glasses come from Austria,” said Dominick Purnomo, of Yono’s Restaurant.
Schumer added, “If this tariff war continues, it could devastate Upstate NY’s economy in ways we haven’t seen since the height of the pandemic. Our local restaurants and other small businesses are already operating on razor thin margins and now they’re being forced into difficult decisions, including if the increase in costs means they will need to raise prices for customers, lay off staff, or even close their business altogether. That is unacceptable.”
“New York State restaurants have faced immense challenges in recent years. From the hardships caused by the COVID-19 pandemic to the soaring price increases driven by inflation and the rising cost of living, many restaurants have fought to stay afloat. The implementation of these new tariffs is yet another blow to an already struggling industry. Tariffs on food and beverages will place an additional strain on restaurants, ultimately leading to higher prices that will be passed on to consumers. Restaurants are not only a cornerstone of New York State’s economy but also serve as essential gathering places for communities to come together and enjoy each other’s company. Simply put, the tariffs are just an unnecessary burden on an industry barely hanging on. We urge the Administration to control consumer price increases as much as possible by exempting food and beverage items from future tariffs,” said Melissa Fleischut, President and CEO of the New York State Restaurant Association.
Other businesses across industries are also facing uncertainty. Latham Pool, the largest designer, manufacturer, and marketer of in-ground residential swimming pools in North America, Australia, and New Zealand, has called the Capital Region its home for nearly 70 years. Latham Pool has 1,500 employees including 300 in New York State, mostly in the Capital Region. Tariffs on foreign goods – especially aluminum and steel – are impacting Latham Pool’s ability to serve its customers and his company along with so many others are deeply fearful of customers pulling back. We are already seeing these fears manifest across America as consumer confidence is cratering and is the lowest it has been in years due to tariffs.
Latham Pool estimates that 15-20% of their materials are sourced from overseas and will be impacted by the tariffs. Worse, they are impacted by the devolving trade relationship with Canada, where the Canadian reciprocal tariff now disadvantages their products for sale in Canada, which has been a strong market for them.
The whiplash and uncertainty over tariffs have also sent the economy into a tailspin. Trump previously delayed the start of his tariffs twice and canceled across-the-board tariffs six days after implementing them. Uncertainty is causing the stock market to fall, causing chaos for restaurants to operate, and shaking the job market.
Schumer said the Senate has a plan to end this dangerous trade war and protect Upstate NY businesses. Earlier this month, the Senate passed a bipartisan resolution to end tariffs on Canada and urged the House to pass it as well. Schumer also said when the Senate returns, he will force a vote to reverse these new taxes of 10% on all imported goods and end the looming threat of additional tariffs of up to 49% on products Americans buy from other countries. Schumer said ending this costly trade war is key to protecting New York from price increases and job losses as a result of tariffs on Canada.
Schumer concluded, “I am all for addressing trade imbalances—I have always been a China hawk and have long fought against unfair trade practices, but these sweeping, ill-conceived tariffs are creating chaos and undermining those goals. Rather than uniting the world against China, Trump has united them against us! No matter which way you slice it, costs are going to skyrocket for our local restaurants and consumers. If you’re in Upstate New York, you’ll feel it first, and worse than just about anywhere in the country. We need everyone, especially NY Republicans, to stand up against Trump’s senseless, job-killing, cost-increasing tax on Upstate New Yorkers.”
When the Senate returns, it will vote on a bipartisan resolution that would terminate the emergency declared by Trump to authorize his global tariffs. If the resolution is enacted into law, the tariffs would be rescinded. The Senate also previously passed a bipartisan resolution terminating Trump’s national emergency that is justifying his destructive tariffs on Canada, which Schumer said the House needs to vote on. Schumer has been a vocal supporter of both resolutions.

MIL OSI USA News –

April 22, 2025

MIL-OSI USA: SCHUMER: SAVE OUR RESTAURANTS & SMALL BUSINESSES FROM TRUMP’S TARIFF WAR, STANDING WITH CENTRAL NY BUSINESSES SEEING MAJOR PRICE INCREASES HURTING FAMILIES & LOCAL JOBS, SENATOR ANNOUNCES SENATE DEMS…

US Senate News:

Source: United States Senator for New York Charles E Schumer
Syracuse’s Renowned Emerald Cocktail Kitchen Is In Panic Over Trump’s Tariffs That Threaten Their Business, And Small Businesses & Manufacturers Across Central NY Are Already Seeing Costs Spike From Trade War With Canada
Senator Says 16,000 NY-ers In Central NY Work In Industries Directly Impacted By Tariffs, And Syracuse Families Could See Prices Rise Nearly $5,000 More A Year
Schumer: We Need To Save Our Restaurants & Small Businesses From Trump’s Tariff War That Is Raising Prices And Killing Jobs
To kickstart National Cost of Living Week of Action, with Trump’s tariff war hammering Syracuse’s restaurants and small businesses, U.S. Senator Chuck Schumer today stood at Syracuse’s renowned Emerald Cocktail Kitchen with Central NY small business leaders who are feeling major hits to their bottom line due to tariffs. The senator said this chaotic, self-destructive tariff war has Upstate NY restaurants, local businesses, and working- and middle-class families footing the bill, with the average family in Central NY estimated to be hit with nearly $5,000 in higher prices per year.
Schumer said every day this chaos continues it risks more than 16,000 jobs in Central NY in industries impacted by the tariffs and even more jobs in Upstate NY’s vital recreation and tourism industries. Schumer said enough is enough, and announced that when the Senate returns he will force a vote to end Trump’s trade war.
“Syracuse and Central New York are on the frontlines of Trump’s destructive tariff war. Let’s be clear: these tariffs are a tax increase on Upstate NY. Family restaurants are the heart and soul of Central New York and the backbone of Main Streets across Upstate New York. They are still recovering from the pandemic. They can’t afford to eat price increases when Trump slaps them with tariffs and neither can their customers. Small businesses and manufacturers have already seen costs skyrocket, and some are being hit with a double whammy as tourism & business from Canada dries up from Trump’s actions. No small business or restaurant in Upstate NY or anywhere in America can operate with this kind of uncertainty,” said Senator Schumer. “We need to save our restaurants & small businesses from Trump’s tariff war. That’s why when the Senate returns, I will force a vote to end this reckless trade war. This is a vital ingredient to protect restaurants and families throughout Central New York and across Upstate New York.”
Schumer explained Central NY restaurants were already hit hard by the pandemic and many are still trying to recover. Schumer explained that restaurants operate on some of the slimmest margins – typically 3 to 5 percent – which could shrink more as tariffs go into effect. Since ingredients are perishable, restaurants don’t have the option of stockpiling materials and they can’t change suppliers on a whim. With the threat of tariffs looming, prices across the board have increased and restaurant owners are worried that customers can’t afford to go out to eat anymore. Without business, they might not be able to recover and would be forced to lay off staff, or worse, close their doors.
A New York Times analysis found that over 16,000 New Yorkers across Central NY including 10,000 in Onondaga County work in industries targeted by Trump’s tariffs, which does not even account for all the related jobs, including in the tourism and recreation industries, that are also being impacted by the damage of this trade war. According to the Main Street Alliance, a network of small businesses, 81.5% of small business respondents to a recent survey indicated they would raise prices for consumers due to tariffs and 31.5% indicated they would lay off employees as a result of the increased costs from tariffs.
The tariffs are also creating uncertainty for families and jobs and are expected to increase costs for the average American family by nearly $5,000 a year, while families are struggling to plan for the future without assurances about their jobs.
At the Emerald Cocktail Kitchen, co-founded by local businesswomen Michelle and Nora Roesch, Trump’s tariffs have already begun to take root and are among the Roesch’s chief concerns moving forward, with some of their liquor and wine being imported from Canada and other countries. On the food side of the house, Emerald’s culinary experts use cheeses like feta and gouda, imported from Greece and the Netherlands, as key ingredients in their burgers, pizzas and salads. They also use fruits and other products imported from Canada and Mexico.
In addition to the wide ranging impact that tariffs will have on Emerald Cocktail Kitchen’s menu, they are driving increased costs across the board, which in turn are driving down consumer discretionary spending. As a result, Emerald Cocktail Kitchen customers have started spending less money on an average visit and opting to save by skipping an appetizer or desert. With customers spending less, the business brings in less and employees receive less in tips on smaller checks. Altogether, Trump’s tariffs have left small businesses like Emerald Cocktail Kitchen exposed to significant impacts, uncertain about how to proceed, and uneasy about what could be next.
The senator said unpredictability makes it difficult for local restaurants to plan for tomorrow, especially when they are already operating on such small margins. For example, when asked about catering orders, owners aren’t sure how to quote orders and are faced with the option of facing sky-high prices when planned events roll around, or even needing to turn down customers. These added challenges make it more difficult for small restaurants to survive against larger chain restaurants.
“Imported goods like tequila, gin, prosecco, Aperol, avocados, limes, feta, gouda, and more – all of which are staples behind our bar and in our kitchen – have surged in price as a result of recent United States tariff policy decisions. In Central New York, small businesses like ours depend on steady customer traffic and predictable costs to survive. Unfortunately, the administration’s back-and-forth approach to tariff implementation has made long-term planning feel impossible,” said Michelle Roesch, Co-owner of Emerald Cocktail Kitchen. “For small Syracuse businesses like ours, Trump’s tariffs have created the same kind of stress and uncertainty we felt during COVID – except this time, it’s self-inflicted. As a result, customers are watching their wallets, staff are taking home smaller tips, and we’ve had to cut back on bulk orders. We need trade policies that lift up small and local businesses, not weigh them down. That is why I am proud to stand in support of Senator Schumer as he fights to force a vote Trump’s trade war in support of small businesses here in Syracuse and all across Upstate NY.”
Schumer added, “If this tariff war continues, it could devastate Upstate NY’s economy in ways we haven’t seen since the height of the pandemic. Our local restaurants and other small businesses are already operating on razor thin margins and now they’re being forced into difficult decisions, including if the increase in costs means they will need to raise prices for customers, lay off staff, or even close their business altogether. That is unacceptable.”
Other businesses across industries are also facing uncertainty. In the City of Syracuse alone, tariffs are among the top concerns at restaurants and artisanal food shops like The Wedge and the Curd Nerd, veteran-owned businesses like Talking Cursive Brewing Company, and local food vendors like Firecracker Thai Kitchen at Salt City Market. Elsewhere in Central New York, 5th generation family and employee-owned northern hardwood lumber producer, Gutchess Lumber, and it’s 500 employee-owners are also bracing for negative impacts to their business.
In the North Country, Trump’s tariffs and trade war with Canada have already taken a toll on craft breweries like 1812 Brewing Company in Watertown, manufacturing companies like AmTech Yarns in Massena, and transportation authorities like the Ogdensburg Bridge & Port Authority. In addition, Alcoa, an aluminum producer based in the North Country, predicts tariffs will cost the company an additional $90 million this quarter alone.
In the Mohawk Valley, local coffee shops like Character Coffee in the City of Utica, and trendy fast-casual restaurants like Laffa’s Mediterranean Grill in the Town of New Hartford have both started to feel the impact of tariffs.
“New York State restaurants have faced immense challenges in recent years. From the hardships caused by the COVID-19 pandemic to the soaring price increases driven by inflation and the rising cost of living, many restaurants have fought to stay afloat. The implementation of these new tariffs is yet another blow to an already struggling industry. Tariffs on food and beverages will place an additional strain on restaurants, ultimately leading to higher prices that will be passed on to consumers. Restaurants are not only a cornerstone of New York State’s economy but also serve as essential gathering places for communities to come together and enjoy each other’s company. Simply put, the tariffs are just an unnecessary burden on an industry barely hanging on. We urge the Administration to control consumer price increases as much as possible by exempting food and beverage items from future tariffs,” said Melissa Fleischut, President and CEO of the New York State Restaurant Association.
“At a small business like Firecracker Thai, we feel the impact of tariffs and increased costs on every single order and with every single purchase. We plan to increase menu prices by 10-15% to help offset rising costs, but our prices can only go so high before we risk pricing out customers. Unfortunately, our planned 10-15% increase is not enough to cover all of our increased costs, so the remainder will take a bite out of our bottom line,” said Sarah Tong-Ngork, Owner of Firecracker Thai Kitchen. “In addition, tariffs have made it more difficult to find authentic, imported ingredients like Jasmine Rice and Rice Noodles at local markets. After the devastating impact that COVID had on the food service industry, the last thing we need is to increase prices and disrupt supply chains. I would like to thank Senator Schumer for coming to Syracuse to fight for small businesses like Firecracker Thai and small business owners like me.”
“As a small craft brewery in Central New York, Talking Cursive Brewing Company faces significant challenges due to tariffs. We rely on imported aluminum cans from Canada, as well as hops and grain from the EU, Australia, and New Zealand. These tariffs, coupled with their ripple effects on the global economy, have been compounded by other actions from the current administration that are reshaping travel, tourism, and consumer behavior. While we experienced a brief uptick in business at the end of 2024 and into January, February and March of this year have seen a sharp decline, with customer counts and sales dropping more than 25% year-over-year. This marks the first time in our seven years of operation that we’ve faced such a downturn in the first quarter,” said Andrew Brooks, Co-Owner of Talking Cursive Brewing Company. “Tourism is a vital part of our business, especially in the summer when 15-20% of our customers are tourists, including about 7% from Canada. Many Canadians I know that travel here often have expressed that they feel disrespected by the current administration, and no longer plan to visit the U.S. in the near future. This decline in tourism directly impacts the revenue of both our tasting room and accounts that we distribute to across New York, including several in the Thousands Islands Region that depend on Canadian tourists. We anticipate a significant loss of sales in that region and will need to reassess the viability of distributing there. I appreciate the efforts that Senator Schumer is taking to help support small businesses like ours during these challenging times.”
“Over the last 24 month, 1812 Brewing Company has invested hundreds of man hours and significant capital to gain entry into the Ontario, Canada market. Because of recently implemented tariffs, the Provincial Government of Ontario has put a stop on the purchase of all American-made craft beer, including our gold medal winning War of 1812 Amber Ale. This will immediately cut off around 10% of our sales,” said Thomas W. Scozzafava, Chairman & CEO of 1812 Brewing Company. “Although relatively small, 1812 Brewing Company and its employees will be hurt by an escalating Trade War with Canada, which could ultimately result in the loss of jobs in our local plant. I hope that those deciding these policies – on both sides of the aisle – understand the true human impact of sudden and dramatic changes to the parameters of trade with our Canadian partners. I thank Senator Schumer for sticking up for small businesses like 1812 and always fighting to protect New York State’s craft breweries.”
“As the owner of Character Coffee in Utica, I rely on specialty roasters who are already feeling the impact of new tariffs. Coffee isn’t grown in the U.S. — so by design, our industry depends on farmers around the world. Even more concerning, these tariffs are piling onto an already fragile supply chain, strained by climate shifts and a year of poor harvests. It’s not just the coffee we have to worry about, but everything from cups and lids to delivery fees,” said Katie Aiello, Owner of Character Coffee. “When costs rise, customers pull back — starting with discretionary spending like grabbing a cup of coffee. The uncertainty is costly too. It’s hard to plan, price, or grow when every week brings new instability in the market. Independent cafes aren’t faceless corporations. We’re local businesses trying to offer good jobs, contribute to the community, and serve something meaningful. These tariffs threaten that. We urgently need thoughtful trade policy that protects American small businesses, and that is why I am proud to stand alongside Senator Schumer in Syracuse today to join in his fight for to safeguard locals businesses like mine.”
“Since we opened in 2021, rising costs have been one of our biggest challenges, and we’ve had no choice but to pass some of that burden onto our customers just to stay open. With tariffs on the horizon, we’re already seeing price hikes on ingredients we depend on, like kalamata olives, tahini, and feta,” said Elias Zeina, Owner of Lafa Mediterranean. “It’s heartbreaking—we’re trying to protect our team and our guests, but I worry about how much more our customers can take. Small business owners like me are feeling squeezed, and our customers are the ones paying the price.
The whiplash and uncertainty over tariffs have also sent the economy into a tailspin. Trump previously delayed the start of his tariffs twice and canceled across-the-board tariffs six days after implementing them. Uncertainty is causing the stock market to fall, causing chaos for restaurants to operate, and shaking the job market.
Schumer said the Senate has a plan to end this dangerous trade war and protect Upstate NY businesses. Earlier this month, the Senate passed a bipartisan resolution to end tariffs on Canada and urged the House to pass it as well. Schumer also said when the Senate returns, he will force a vote to reverse these new taxes of 10% on all imported goods and end the looming threat of additional tariffs of up to 49% on products Americans buy from other countries. Schumer said ending this costly trade war is key to protecting New York from price increases and job losses as a result of tariffs on Canada.
Schumer concluded, “I am all for addressing trade imbalances—I have always been a China hawk and have long fought against unfair trade practices, but these sweeping, ill-conceived tariffs are creating chaos and undermining those goals. Rather than uniting the world against China, Trump has united them against us! No matter which way you slice it, costs are going to skyrocket for our local restaurants and consumers. If you’re in Upstate New York, you’ll feel it first, and worse than just about anywhere in the country. We need everyone, especially NY Republicans, to stand up against Trump’s senseless, job-killing, cost-increasing tax on Upstate New Yorkers.”
When the Senate returns, it will vote on a bipartisan resolution that would terminate the emergency declared by Trump to authorize his global tariffs. If the resolution is enacted into law, the tariffs would be rescinded. The Senate also previously passed a bipartisan resolution terminating Trump’s national emergency that is justifying his destructive tariffs on Canada, which Schumer said the House needs to vote on. Schumer has been a vocal supporter of both resolutions.

MIL OSI USA News –

April 22, 2025

MIL-OSI: NorthEast Community Bancorp, Inc. Reports Results for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2025

Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

WHITE PLAINS, N.Y., April 21, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — NorthEast Community Bancorp, Inc. (Nasdaq: NECB) (the “Company”), the parent holding company of NorthEast Community Bank (the “Bank”), generated net income of $10.6 million, or $0.80 per basic share and $0.78 per diluted share, for the three months ended March 31, 2025 compared to net income of $11.4 million, or $0.87 per basic share and $0.86 per diluted share, for the three months ended March 31, 2024.

Kenneth A. Martinek, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, stated, “We are, once again, pleased to report another quarter of strong earnings due to the excellent performance of our loan portfolio. Despite the challenging economic operating environment thus far in 2025, loan demand is strong with originations and outstanding commitments robust and increasing. As in the past, construction lending in high demand-high absorption areas continues to be our focus.”

Highlights for the three months ended March 31, 2025 are as follows:

Performance metrics continue to be strong at March 31, 2025, with a return on average total assets ratio of 2.12%, a return on average shareholders’ equity ratio of 12.98%, and an efficiency ratio of 41.64%.
Asset quality metrics continued to remain strong with no non-performing loans at either March 31, 2025 or December 31, 2024, and non-performing assets to total assets of 0.26% and 0.25% at March 31, 2025 and at December 31, 2024, respectively. Our allowance for credit losses related to loans totaled $5.1 million, or 0.30% of total loans at March 31, 2025 compared to $4.9 million, or 0.27% of total loans at December 31, 2024.
We increased total stockholders’ equity by $8.9 million, or 2.8%, to $327.2 million, or 16.92% of total assets as of March 31, 2025 from $318.3 million, or 15.84% of total assets as of December 31, 2024.

Balance Sheet Summary

Total assets decreased $76.2 million, or 3.8%, to $1.9 billion at March 31, 2025, from $2.0 billion at December 31, 2024. The decrease in assets was primarily due to decreases in net loans of $87.3 million and decreases of $1.0 million in accrued interest receivable, partially offset by increases in cash and cash equivalents of $11.2 million and increases of $1.3 million in equity securities.

Cash and cash equivalents increased $11.2 million, or 14.3%, to $89.5 million at March 31, 2025 from $78.3 million at December 31, 2024. The increase in cash and cash equivalents was a result of a decrease of $87.3 million in net loans and an increase of $8.9 million in stockholders’ equity, partially offset by a decrease in deposits of $84.4 million.

Equity securities increased $1.3 million, or 5.9%, to $23.3 million at March 31, 2025 from $22.0 million at December 31, 2024. The increase in equity securities was attributable to the purchase of $1.0 million in equity securities during the three months ended March 31, 2025 and market appreciation of $300,000 due to market interest rate volatility during the quarter ended March 31, 2025.

Securities held-to-maturity decreased $129,000, or 0.9%, to $14.5 million at March 31, 2025 from $14.6 million at December 31, 2024 due to $129,000 in maturities and pay-downs of various investment securities.

Loans, net of the allowance for credit losses, decreased $87.3 million, or 4.8%, to $1.7 billion at March 31, 2025 from $1.8 billion at December 31, 2024. The decrease in loans consisted of decreases of $138.9 million in construction loans, $248,000 in non-residential loans, and $36,000 in one-to-four family loans. The decrease in our construction loan portfolio was due to normal pay-downs and principal reductions as construction projects were completed and either condominium units were sold to end buyers or multi-family rental buildings were refinanced by other financial institutions. The decrease in construction loans was offset by increases of $46.4 million in multi-family loans, $4.4 million in commercial and industrial loans, and $1.5 million in consumer loans.

During the quarter ended March 31, 2025, we originated loans totaling $170.1 million consisting primarily of $110.2 million in construction loans, $49.1 million in multi-family loans, $10.1 million in commercial and industrial loans, and $730,000 in mixed-use loans. The $110.2 million in construction loans had 38.4% disbursed at loan closing, with the remaining funds to be disbursed over the terms of the construction loans.

The allowance for credit losses related to loans increased to $5.1 million as of March 31, 2025, from $4.8 million as of December 31, 2024. The increase in the allowance for credit losses related to loans was due to recoveries totaling $352,000 and provision for credit losses totaling $62,000, offset by charge-offs totaling $117,000.

Premises and equipment increased $84,000, or 0.3%, to $24.9 million at March 31, 2025 from $24.8 million at December 31, 2024 primarily due to the purchases of additional fixed assets.

Federal Home Loan Bank stock was $397,000, foreclosed real estate was $5.1 million, and property held for investment was $1.4 million at both March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024.

Bank owned life insurance (“BOLI”) increased $167,000, or 0.6%, to $25.9 million at March 31, 2025 from $25.7 million at December 31, 2024 due to increases in the BOLI cash value.

Accrued interest receivable decreased $1.0 million, or 7.9%, to $12.4 million at March 31, 2025 from $13.5 million at December 31, 2024 due to a decrease in the loan portfolio.

Right of use assets — operating decreased $145,000, or 3.6%, to $3.9 million at March 31, 2025 from $4.0 million at December 31, 2024, primarily due to amortization.

Other assets decreased $328,000, or 2.8%, to $11.3 million at March 31, 2025 from $11.6 million at December 31, 2024 due to decreases of $1.7 million in tax assets and $10,000 in miscellaneous assets, partially offset by increases of $1.1 million in suspense accounts and $263,000 in prepaid expenses.

Total deposits decreased $84.4 million, or 5.1%, to $1.6 billion at March 31, 2025 from $1.7 billion at December 31, 2024. The decrease in deposits was primarily due to decreases in certificates of deposit of $125.1 million, or 12.5%, and non-interest bearing deposits of $9.9 million, or 3.5%, partially offset by increases in NOW/money market accounts of $45.9 million, or 18.8%, and savings account balances of $3.3 million, or 2.4%. The decrease of $125.1 million in certificates of deposit consisted of a decrease in retail certificates of deposit of $76.0 million, or 14.8%, and a decrease in brokered certificates of deposit of $54.8 million, or 12.6%, partially offset by an increase in non-brokered listing services certificates of deposit of $5.7 million, or 17.0%.

The decrease in retail certificates of deposit was due to a shift in deposits to our retail high yield money market accounts. The decrease in brokered certificates of deposit was due to management’s strategy to reduce the cost of funds by “calling” higher rate brokered deposits on their call dates.

Advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance increased $680,000, or 42.0%, to $2.3 million at March 31, 2025 from $1.6 million at December 31, 2024 due primarily to accumulation of real estate tax payments from borrowers.

Lease liability – operating decreased $136,000, or 3.3%, to $4.0 million at March 31, 2025 from $4.1 million at December 31, 2024, primarily due to amortization.

Accounts payable and accrued expenses decreased $1.3 million, or 8.7%, to $13.3 million at March 31, 2025 from $14.5 million at December 31, 2024 due primarily to a decrease in accrued expense of $2.8 million, partially offset by increases in dividends payable and other payables of $806,000, suspense accounts for loan closings of $346,000, and deferred compensation of $167,000. The allowance for credit losses for off-balance sheet commitments increased $175,000, or 24.8%, to $879,000 at March 31, 2025 from $704,000 at December 31, 2024 due primarily to an increase of $101.4 million, or 18.0%, in off-balance sheet commitments.

Stockholders’ equity increased $8.9 million, or 2.8% to $327.2 million at March 31, 2025, from $318.3 million at December 31, 2024. The increase in stockholders’ equity was due to net income of $10.6 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2025, an increase of $302,000 in earned employee stock ownership plan shares coupled with a reduction of $217,000 in unearned employee stock ownership plan shares, and the amortization expense of $478,000 relating to restricted stock and stock options granted under the Company’s 2022 Equity Incentive Plan, partially offset by dividends declared of $2.7 million and $13,000 in other comprehensive loss.

Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2025 and 2024

Net Interest Income

Net interest income was $24.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025, as compared to $25.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2024. The decrease in net interest income of $722,000, or 2.9%, was primarily due to an increase in interest expense that exceeded an increase in interest income and a decrease in the yield on interest earning assets that exceeded a decrease in the cost of funds for interest bearing liabilities.

Total interest and dividend income increased $86,000, or 0.2%, to $38.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025 from $38.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2024. The increase in interest and dividend income was due to an increase in the average balance of interest earning assets of $159.9 million, or 9.2%, to $1.9 billion for the three months ended March 31, 2025 from $1.7 billion for the three months ended March 31, 2024, partially offset by a decrease in the yield on interest earning assets by 72 basis points from 8.77% for the three months ended March 31, 2024 to 8.05% for the three months ended March 31, 2025.

Interest expense increased $808,000, or 6.2%, to $13.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025 from $13.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2024. The increase in interest expense was due to an increase in average interest bearing liabilities of $149.7 million, or 12.2%, to $1.4 billion for the three months ended March 31, 2025 from $1.2 billion for the three months ended March 31, 2024, partially offset by a decrease in the cost of interest bearing liabilities by 24 basis points from 4.29% for the three months ended March 31, 2024 to 4.05% for the three months ended March 31, 2025.

Our net interest margin decreased 64 basis points, or 11.1%, to 5.11% for the three months ended March 31, 2025 compared to 5.75% for the three months ended March 31, 2024. The decrease in the net interest margin was due to a decrease in the yield on interest-earning assets that exceeded a decrease in the cost of funds on interest-bearing liabilities.

Credit Loss Expense

The Company recorded a credit loss expense of $237,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2025 compared to a credit loss expense reduction of $165,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2024. The credit loss expense of $237,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2025 was comprised of credit loss expense for loans of $62,000 and credit loss expense for off-balance sheet commitments of $175,000.

The credit loss expense for loans of $62,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2025 was primarily due to an increase in the multi-family loan portfolio. The credit loss expense for off-balance sheet commitments of $175,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2025 was primarily due to an increase in unfunded off-balance sheet commitments.

The credit loss expense reduction of $165,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2024 was comprised of a credit loss expense reduction for loans of $145,000, a credit loss expense reduction for held-to-maturity investment securities of $3,000, and a credit loss expense reduction for off-balance sheet commitments of $17,000. The credit loss expense reduction for loans of $145,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2024 was primarily attributed to favorable trend in the economy.

With respect to the allowance for credit losses for loans, we charged-off $117,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2025 as compared to charge-offs of $21,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2024. The charge-offs during both periods were against various unpaid overdrafts in our demand deposit accounts.

We recorded recoveries of $352,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2025 compared to no recoveries during the three months ended March 31, 2024. The recoveries of $352,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2025 comprised of recoveries of $350,000 regarding a previously charged-off non-residential mortgage loan and $2,000 from a previously charged-off unpaid overdraft on a demand deposit account.

Non-Interest Income

Non-interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2025 was $1.2 million compared to non-interest income of $554,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2024. The increase of $681,000, or 122.9%, in total non-interest income was primarily due to increases of $382,000 in unrealized gain/(loss) on equity securities, $278,000 in other loan fees and service charges, $11,000 in miscellaneous other non-interest income, and $10,000 in BOLI income.

The increase in unrealized gain/(loss) on equity securities was due to an unrealized gain of $300,000 on equity securities during the three months ended March 31, 2025 compared to an unrealized loss of $82,000 on equity securities during the three months ended March 31, 2024. The unrealized gain of $300,000 on equity securities during the three months ended March 31, 2025 was due to market interest rate volatility during the three months ended March 31, 2025.

The increase of $278,000 in other loan fees and service charges was due to an increase of $245,000 in other loan fees and loan servicing fees, an increase of $31,000 in ATM/debit card/ACH fees, and an increase of $2,000 in deposit account fees.

The increase in BOLI income of $10,000 was due to an increase in the yield on BOLI assets.

Non-Interest Expense

Non-interest expense increased $938,000, or 9.7%, to $10.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025 from $9.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2024. The increase resulted primarily from increases of $582,000 in salaries and employee benefits, $221,000 in other operating expense, $98,000 in outside data processing expense, $40,000 in occupancy expense, $19,000 in real estate owned expense, and $14,000 in advertising expense, partially offset by a decrease of $36,000 in equipment expense.

Income Taxes

We recorded income tax expense of $4.1 million and $4.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. For the three months ended March 31, 2025, we had approximately $204,000 in tax exempt income, compared to approximately $195,000 in tax exempt income for the three months ended March 31, 2024. Our effective income tax rates were 27.8% for the three months ended March 31, 2025 compared to 29.0% for the three months ended March 31, 2024.

Asset Quality

Non-performing assets were $5.1 million at March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively. These non-performing assets consisted of two foreclosed properties, with one foreclosed property totaling $4.4 million located in the Bronx, New York and one foreclosed property totaling $767,000 located in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Our ratio of non-performing assets to total assets remained low at 0.26% at March 31, 2025 as compared to 0.25% at December 31, 2024.

The Company’s allowance for credit losses related to loans was $5.1 million, or 0.30% of total loans as of March 31, 2025, compared to $4.8 million, or 0.27% of total loans as of December 31, 2024. Based on a review of the loans that were in the loan portfolio at March 31, 2025, management believes that the allowance for credit losses related to loans is maintained at a level that represents its best estimate of inherent losses in the loan portfolio that were both probable and reasonably estimable.

In addition, at March 31, 2025, the Company’s allowance for credit losses related to off-balance sheet commitments totaled $879,000 and the allowance for credit losses related to held-to-maturity debt securities totaled $126,000.

Capital

The Company’s total stockholders’ equity to assets ratio was 16.92% as of March 31, 2025. At March 31, 2025, the Company had the ability to borrow $941.3 million from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, $15.5 million from the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York, and $8.0 million from Atlantic Community Bankers Bank.

The Bank’s capital position remains strong relative to current regulatory requirements and the Bank is considered a well-capitalized institution under the Prompt Corrective Action framework. As of March 31, 2025, the Bank had a tier 1 leverage capital ratio of 15.09% and a total risk-based capital ratio of 15.10%.

The Company completed its first stock repurchase program on April 14, 2023 whereby the Company repurchased 1,637,794 shares, or 10%, of the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock. The cost of the stock repurchase program totaled $23.0 million, including commission costs and Federal excise taxes. Of the total shares repurchased under this program, 957,275 of such shares were repurchased during 2023 at a total cost of $13.7 million, including commission costs and Federal excise taxes.

The Company commenced its second stock repurchase program on May 30, 2023 whereby the Company will repurchase 1,509,218, or 10%, of the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock. As of March 31, 2025, the Company had repurchased 1,091,174 shares of common stock under its second repurchase program, at a cost of $17.2 million, including commission costs and Federal excise taxes.

About NorthEast Community Bancorp

NorthEast Community Bancorp, headquartered at 325 Hamilton Avenue, White Plains, New York 10601, is the holding company for NorthEast Community Bank, which conducts business through its eleven branch offices located in Bronx, New York, Orange, Rockland, and Sullivan Counties in New York and Essex, Middlesex, and Norfolk Counties in Massachusetts and three loan production offices located in New City, New York, White Plains, New York, and Danvers, Massachusetts. For more information about NorthEast Community Bancorp and NorthEast Community Bank, please visit www.necb.com.

Forward Looking Statement

This press release contains certain forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include statements regarding anticipated future events and can be identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. They often include words such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” and “intend” or future or conditional verbs such as “will,” “would,” “should,” “could,” or “may.” These statements are based upon the current beliefs and expectations of the Company’s management and are subject to significant risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements as a result of numerous factors. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from expected results include, but are not limited to, changes in market interest rates, regional and national economic conditions (including higher inflation or recessionary conditions and their impact on regional and national economic conditions), legislative and regulatory changes, monetary and fiscal policies of the United States government, including policies of the United States Treasury and the Federal Reserve Board, the impacts of tariffs, sanctions and other trade policies of the United States and its global trading counterparts, the quality and composition of the loan or investment portfolios, demand for loan products, decreases in deposit levels necessitating increased borrowing to fund loans and securities, competition, demand for financial services in NorthEast Community Bank’s market area, changes in the real estate market values in NorthEast Community Bank’s market area, the impact of failures or disruptions in or breaches of the Company’s operational or security systems, data or infrastructure, or those of third parties, including as a result of cyberattacks or campaigns, and changes in relevant accounting principles and guidelines. Additionally, other risks and uncertainties may be described in our annual and quarterly reports filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), which are available through the SEC’s website located at www.sec.gov. These risks and uncertainties should be considered in evaluating any forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. Except as required by applicable law or regulation, the Company does not undertake, and specifically disclaims any obligation, to release publicly the result of any revisions that may be made to any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of the statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events.

CONTACT:		Kenneth A. Martinek
		Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

PHONE:		(914) 684-2500


NORTHEAST COMMUNITY BANCORP, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION (Unaudited)

	March 31,			December 31,
	2025			2024
	(In thousands, except share
	and per share amounts)
ASSETS
Cash and amounts due from depository institutions	$	11,524		$	13,700
Interest-bearing deposits		77,934			64,559
Total cash and cash equivalents		89,458			78,259
Certificates of deposit		100			100
Equity securities		23,294			21,994
Securities held-to-maturity ( net of allowance for credit losses of $126 and $126, respectively )		14,487			14,616
Loans receivable		1,725,664			1,812,647
Deferred loan fees, net		(63	)		(49	)
Allowance for credit losses		(5,127	)		(4,830	)
Net loans		1,720,474			1,807,768
Premises and equipment, net		24,889			24,805
Investments in restricted stock, at cost		397			397
Bank owned life insurance		25,905			25,738
Accrued interest receivable		12,432			13,481
Real estate owned		5,120			5,120
Property held for investment		1,361			1,370
Right of Use Assets – Operating		3,856			4,001
Right of Use Assets – Financing		346			347
Other assets		11,257			11,585
Total assets	$	1,933,376		$	2,009,581
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Liabilities:
Deposits:
Non-interest bearing	$	278,694		$	287,135
Interest bearing		1,307,321			1,383,240
Total deposits		1,586,015			1,670,375
Advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance		2,298			1,618
Lease Liability – Operating		3,972			4,108
Lease Liability – Financing		619			609
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		13,262			14,530
Total liabilities		1,606,166			1,691,240

Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 25,000,000 shares authorized; none issued or outstanding	$	—		$	—
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 75,000,000 shares authorized; 14,023,376 shares and 14,016,254 shares outstanding, respectively		140			140
Additional paid-in capital		110,871			110,091
Unearned Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”) shares		(5,870	)		(6,088	)
Retained earnings		221,858			213,974
Accumulated other comprehensive gain		211			224
Total stockholders’ equity		327,210			318,341
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	1,933,376		$	2,009,581


NORTHEAST COMMUNITY BANCORP, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (Unaudited)

	Quarter Ended March 31,
	2025		2024
	(In thousands, except per share amounts)
INTEREST INCOME:
Loans	$	36,882	$	36,703
Interest-earning deposits		1,081		1,200
Securities		244		218
Total Interest Income		38,207		38,121
INTEREST EXPENSE:
Deposits		13,933		12,394
Borrowings		–		731
Financing lease		10		10
Total Interest Expense		13,943		13,135
Net Interest Income		24,264		24,986
Provision for (reversal of) credit loss		237		(165	)
Net Interest Income after Provision for (Reversal of) Credit Loss		24,027		25,151
NON-INTEREST INCOME:
Other loan fees and service charges		740		462
Earnings on bank owned life insurance		167		157
Unrealized gain (loss) on equity securities		300		(82	)
Other		28		17
Total Non-Interest Income		1,235		554
NON-INTEREST EXPENSES:
Salaries and employee benefits		5,933		5,351
Occupancy expense		747		707
Equipment		217		253
Outside data processing		735		637
Advertising		102		88
Real estate owned expense		30		11
Other		2,855		2,634
Total Non-Interest Expenses		10,619		9,681
INCOME BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES		14,643		16,024
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES		4,076		4,650
NET INCOME	$	10,567	$	11,374


NORTHEAST COMMUNITY BANCORP, INC. SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA (Unaudited)

	Quarter Ended March 31,
	2025			2024
	(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Per share data:
Earnings per share – basic	$	0.80		$	0.87
Earnings per share – diluted		0.78			0.86
Weighted average shares outstanding – basic		13,192			13,118
Weighted average shares outstanding – diluted		13,560			13,191
Performance ratios/data:
Return on average total assets		2.12	%		2.50	%
Return on average shareholders’ equity		12.98	%		15.88	%
Net interest income	$	24,264		$	24,986
Net interest margin		5.11	%		5.75	%
Efficiency ratio		41.64	%		37.91	%
Net charge-off ratio		(0.05	)%		0.00	%

Loan portfolio composition:		March 31, 2025			December 31, 2024
One-to-four family	$	3,436		$	3,472
Multi-family		253,018			206,606
Mixed-use		26,572			26,571
Total residential real estate		283,026			236,649
Non-residential real estate		29,198			29,446
Construction		1,287,225			1,426,167
Commercial and industrial		123,113			118,736
Consumer		3,102			1,649
Gross loans		1,725,664			1,812,647
Deferred loan fees, net		(63	)		(49	)
Total loans	$	1,725,601		$	1,812,598
Asset quality data:
Loans past due over 90 days and still accruing	$	–		$	–
Non-accrual loans		–			–
OREO property		5,120			5,120
Total non-performing assets	$	5,120		$	5,120

Allowance for credit losses to total loans		0.30	%		0.27	%
Allowance for credit losses to non-performing loans		0.00	%		0.00	%
Non-performing loans to total loans		0.00	%		0.00	%
Non-performing assets to total assets		0.26	%		0.25	%

Bank’s Regulatory Capital ratios:
Total capital to risk-weighted assets		15.10	%		13.92	%
Common equity tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets		14.79	%		13.65	%
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets		14.79	%		13.65	%
Tier 1 leverage ratio		15.09	%		14.44	%


NORTHEAST COMMUNITY BANCORP, INC. NET INTEREST MARGIN ANALYSIS (Unaudited)

	Quarter Ended March 31, 2025								Quarter Ended March 31, 2024
	Average Balance			Interest and dividend		Average Yield			Average Balance			Interest and dividend		Average Yield
	(In thousands, except yield/cost information)								(In thousands, except yield/cost information)
Loan receivable gross	$	1,767,849		$	36,882		8.35	%	$	1,612,343		$	36,703		9.11	%
Securities		36,751			235		2.56	%		33,848			197		2.33	%
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		397			9		9.07	%		842			21		9.98	%
Other interest-earning assets		93,476			1,081		4.63	%		91,552			1,200		5.24	%
Total interest-earning assets		1,898,473			38,207		8.05	%		1,738,585			38,121		8.77	%
Allowance for credit losses		(4,827	)							(5,091	)
Non-interest-earning assets		96,493								88,859
Total assets	$	1,990,139							$	1,822,353

Interest-bearing demand deposit	$	274,630		$	2,445		3.56	%	$	171,483		$	1,817		4.24	%
Savings and club accounts		138,903			730		2.10	%		182,771			1,202		2.63	%
Certificates of deposit		962,084			10,758		4.47	%		810,586			9,375		4.63	%
Total interest-bearing deposits		1,375,617			13,933		4.05	%		1,164,840			12,394		4.26	%
Borrowed money		–			10		0.00	%		61,092			741		4.85	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities		1,375,617			13,943		4.05	%		1,225,932			13,135		4.29	%
Non-interest-bearing demand deposit		270,874								291,909
Other non-interest-bearing liabilities		18,086								18,090
Total liabilities		1,664,577								1,535,931
Equity		325,562								286,422
Total liabilities and equity	$	1,990,139							$	1,822,353

Net interest income / interest spread				$	24,264		4.00	%				$	24,986		4.48	%
Net interest rate margin							5.11	%							5.75	%
Net interest earning assets	$	522,856							$	512,653
Average interest-earning assets
to interest-bearing liabilities		138.01	%							141.82	%

The MIL Network –

April 22, 2025

MIL-OSI Economics: Citi and Houlihan Lokey top M&A financial advisers in financial services sector in Q1 2025, reveals GlobalData

Source: GlobalData

Citi and Houlihan Lokey top M&A financial advisers in financial services sector in Q1 2025, reveals GlobalData

Posted in Business Fundamentals

Citi and Houlihan Lokey were the top mergers and acquisitions (M&A) financial advisers in the financial services sector during the first quarter (Q1) of 2025 by value and volume, respectively, according to the latest financial advisers league table by GlobalData, which ranks financial advisers by the value and volume of M&A deals on which they advised.

Based on its Deals Database, the leading data and analytics company has revealed that Citi achieved its leading position in terms of value by advising on $16.9 billion worth of deals. Meanwhile, Houlihan Lokey led in terms of volume by advising on a total of 12 deals.

Aurojyoti Bose, Lead Analyst at GlobalData, comments: “During Q1 2025, Houlihan Lokey was the only adviser to hit double-digit deal volume. There was a notable improvement in the total number of deals advised by it during Q1 2025 compared to Q1 2024. Resultantly, it went ahead from occupying the 19^th position by volume in Q1 2024 to top the chart by this metric in Q1 2025.

“Meanwhile, Citi also registered improvement in terms of value, as most of the deals advised by it during Q1 2025 were big-ticket deals. Resultantly, its ranking by value also improved from the 11^th position in Q1 2024 to the top position in Q1 2025. Four of the five deals advised by Citi during Q1 2025 were billion-dollar deals* that also included one mega deal valued more than $10 billion. Apart from leading by value, Citi also occupied the seventh position in terms of deal volume during Q1 2025.”

An analysis of GlobalData’s Deals Database reveals that JP Morgan occupied the second position in terms of value, by advising on $16.4 billion worth of deals, followed by Goldman Sachs with $15 billion, UBS with $6.2 billion, and Morgan Stanley with $5.3 billion.

Meanwhile, Piper Sandler occupied the second position in terms of volume with nine deals, followed by JP Morgan with eight deals, UBS with seven deals, and PwC with seven deals.

*Valued more than or equal to $1 billion

MIL OSI Economics –

April 22, 2025

MIL-OSI Economics: Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison and Debevoise & Plimpton top M&A legal advisers in financial services sector during Q1 2025, reveals GlobalData

Source: GlobalData

Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison and Debevoise & Plimpton top M&A legal advisers in financial services sector during Q1 2025, reveals GlobalData

Posted in Business Fundamentals

Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison and Debevoise & Plimpton were the top mergers and acquisitions (M&A) legal advisers in the financial services sector during the first quarter (Q1) of 2025 by value and volume, respectively, according to the latest legal advisers league table by GlobalData, which ranks legal advisers by the value and volume of M&A deals on which they advised.

Based on its Deals Database, the leading data and analytics company has revealed that Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison achieved its leading position in terms of value by advising on $12 billion worth of deals. Meanwhile, Debevoise & Plimpton led in terms of volume by advising on eight deals.

Aurojyoti Bose, Lead Analyst at GlobalData, comments: “There was an improvement in the total number of deals advised by Debevoise & Plimpton in Q1 2025 compared to Q1 2024. Resultantly, its ranking by volume also improved from the 11^th position in Q1 2024 to the top position in Q1 2025. Apart from leading by volume in Q1 2025, Debevoise & Plimpton also held the ninth position by value.

“Meanwhile, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison saw its ranking by value improve from the sixth position in Q1 2024 to the top position in Q1 2025 even though it experienced a year-on-year drop in the total value of deals advised. Apart from leading by value, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison also held the fifth position by volume in Q1 2025.

An analysis of GlobalData’s Deals Database reveals that Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz occupied the second position in terms of value, by advising on $12 billion worth of deals, followed by Bradley Arant Boult Cummings with $12 billion, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom with $5.2 billion, and Chiomenti Studio Legale with $4.5 billion.

Meanwhile, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett occupied the second position in terms of volume with eight deals, followed by Alston & Bird with eight deals, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz with seven deals, and Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison with six deals.

MIL OSI Economics –

April 22, 2025

MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: Data Users Conference: Strengthening the Bridge Between Data Producers and Users

Source: Government of India

Posted On: 21 APR 2025 9:07PM by PIB Delhi

The National Statistics Office (NSO), Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation (MoSPI), organized the Data Users Conference on 21st April 2025, in collaboration with the Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research (IGIDR), Mumbai.

The conference aimed to foster constructive dialogue between data producers and data users, facilitating knowledge exchange on methodologies, insights from the latest Household Consumption Expenditure Survey, Methodology changes in PLFS and key initiatives in macro-economic statistics including GDP and Consumer Price Indices. The event witnessed active participation from more than 250 attendees comprising policymakers, academicians, researchers, economists, industry representatives, and international organizations.

The conference was chaired by Dr. Saurabh Garg, Secretary, MoSPI, who emphasized the Ministry’s core vision of ‘Data for Development’. He highlighted MoSPI’s efforts toward enhancing data credibility, timeliness, accessibility, and relevance through technological interventions for timely release of key indicators like PLFS monthly estimates, quarterly unincorporated sector surveys, and a focus on comprehensive metadata standardization. He underlined the Ministry’s commitment to integrate administrative and survey data to fill existing gaps in the statistical ecosystem. Dr. Garg mentioned that MoSPI has actively working with research institutes to promote collaborative research.

In his address, Dr. Nilkanth Mishra, Member, EAC-PM and Chairman, UIDAI, underscored the pressing need for more granular and timely data, especially in light of India’s fast-evolving digital and informal economy. Drawing from personal experiences, he highlighted the critical gaps in economic data and appreciated MoSPI’s ongoing efforts to modernize the data access for both private and public stakeholders.

Ms. Geeta Singh Rathore, Director General (NSS), elaborated on recent advancements in the Periodic Labour Force Survey (PLFS), particularly the expansion of estimates of the Labour statistics to rural areas and the introduction of monthly releases of PLFS for enhanced policy responsiveness.

Prof. Basanta Kumar Pradhan, Director, IGIDR, welcomed the delegates and acknowledged MoSPI’s role in promoting an ecosystem of data-driven research and policy-making. He emphasized the importance of understanding data generation processes, recognizing limitations, and integrating user feedback to refine methodologies.

These key note addresses set the stage for technical sessions. The conference features four technical sessions.

The forenoon technical sessions covered:

The first session has a detailed presentation on the sampling design used in NSS household surveys. The session continued with a presentation on the ‘Lessons Learned from HCES 2022-23 and 2023-24, highlighted on the key changes introduced in the most recent rounds of HCES. The presentations are followed by an enriched panel discussion and suggested to generate consumption data at sector level on quarterly basis, standardization of tools for improving the quality and exploring the scope of introducing the concepts of ‘spending’ instead of consumption as a measure of MPCE.
Updates on the evolution of the Periodic Labour Force Survey (PLFS), including the original objectives from its 2017 launch and recent changes implemented from January 2025. Key updates include generating monthly estimates of labour market indicators (LFPR, WPR, and UR) for both rural and urban areas, expanding quarterly estimates to rural regions, and allowing district-level estimates in collaboration with states.

In the afternoon session Shri N.K. Santoshi, DG (Central Statistics), MoSPI, in his opening remarks highlighted the initiatives taken by the MoSPI for updating the base years of key macro-economic indicators viz GDP and CPI.

The afternoon technical sessions covered:

The session includes a presentation on compilation of GDP estimates and base year revision detailing the framework of compilation, proposed improvements in base revision and issues in interpreting the estimates. This was followed by a panel discussion wherein panellist recommended to publish detailed documentation of sources and methods, need for consistent and coherent back-series data. They also welcomed the proposed use of new data sources such as GSTN, UPI etc. in the new base.
During the session on CPI, the ongoing work on CPI revision, key upcoming changes such as the adoption of COICOP 2018, expanded service and market coverage, integration of online data sources, and improvements in the Housing Index methodology were presented. The presentation was followed by a panel discussion wherein it was suggested to release seasonally adjusted inflation data. MoSPI informed that a study in collaboration with IIT Kanpur for developing seasonally adjusted CPI figures for India is underway.

Post-panel discussions, the floor was opened for discussions, providing participants to directly engage with the speakers and panelists.

The conference reaffirmed the collective commitment of MoSPI, IGIDR, and data users to uphold and advance the quality, integrity, and usability of official statistics in India. It concluded with a call to further deepen cooperation, embrace technological advancements, and ensure data remains at the heart of evidence-based policymaking.

The Data User Conference concluded with the key take away of need for standardization between the statistical products.

For more details on the survey reports and upcoming statistical releases, please visit the official MoSPI website: www.mospi.gov.in.

****

Samrat

(Release ID: 2123310) Visitor Counter : 33

MIL OSI Asia Pacific News –

April 22, 2025

MIL-OSI USA: FEMA to Host Housing Resource Fair April 26 in Burke County

Source: US Federal Emergency Management Agency 2

EMA is hosting a Housing Resource Fair on Saturday, April 26 from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. in Burke County at the following location:
Burke County Office Park Auditorium
715 W 6thSt.
Waynesboro, GA 30830
The Housing Resource Fair will bring together federal, state and local agencies in one place to offer services and resources to families recovering from Hurricane Helene.
The goal of this collaborative effort is to help connect eligible disaster survivors with affordable housing along with valuable information and resources on their road to recovery.
Survivors will meet with local housing organizations, property owners and landlords, as well as get information on the HEARTS Georgia Sheltering Program and U.S. Small Business Administration loans.
The Housing Resource Fair is an opportunity for survivors to:

Explore affordable housing options and rental assistance programs.
Meet with representatives from local housing organizations, landlords and property managers.
Gain access to resources for displaced individuals and families.
Learn from community partners about educational funding resources.

For FEMA Federal Coordinating Officer Kevin Wallace, the Housing Resource Fair is an opportunity to give survivors a one-on-one experience: “We want survivors to know we are here for them and want to see the best outcome, which is moving into safe, sanitary and functioning housing,” he said. “We will walk them through their options to ensure they are aware of the resources that are available to fit their need.”
Anyone affected by Tropical Storm Debby or Hurricane Helene, whether they applied for FEMA assistance or not, is welcome to attend.

MIL OSI USA News –

April 22, 2025

MIL-OSI USA: S. 300, DLARA

Source: US Congressional Budget Office

S. 300 would require the Small Business Administration (SBA) to provide more detailed information about disaster loans and their funding to the Congress, including as part of its monthly reports and annual budget request. In addition, the bill would require the SBA to notify the Congress when the funding available for disaster loans drops below 10 percent of the average annual cost of making those loans over the past decade and would authorize the agency to limit obligations for new loans to levels backed by collateral during those periods.

The bill also would require the Governmental Accountability Office (GAO) to report to the Congress on the effect of those changes and of regulations finalized in 2023 and 2024, as well as on the historical rates of obligation and disbursement of funds for disaster loans.

Based on the costs of similar activities, CBO estimates that the reporting requirements would cost GAO $1 million over the 2025-2030 period. Using information from the SBA, CBO estimates that its costs to report and perform other administrative activities would not be significant. Any related spending would be subject to the availability of appropriated funds.

The CBO staff contact for this estimate is Jon Sperl. The estimate was reviewed by H. Samuel Papenfuss, Deputy Director of Budget Analysis.

Phillip L. Swagel

Director, Congressional Budget Office

MIL OSI USA News –

April 22, 2025

MIL-OSI USA: SBA Offers Relief to New Mexico Small Businesses and Private Nonprofits Affected by Drought

Source: United States Small Business Administration

SACRAMENTO, Calif. – The U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) announced the availability of low interest federal disaster loans to small businesses and private nonprofit (PNP) organizations in New Mexico who sustained economic losses due to the drought beginning April 8.

The declaration covers the New Mexico counties of Bernalillo, Cibola, Colfax, Guadalupe, Harding, Los Alamos, McKinley, Mora, Quay, Rio Arriba, San Juan, San Miguel, Sandoval, Santa Fe, Taos and Torrance as well as the Colorado counties of Conejos and Costilla.

Under this declaration, SBA’s Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) program is available to small businesses, small agricultural cooperatives, nurseries, and PNPs with financial losses directly related to the disaster. The SBA is unable to provide disaster loans to agricultural producers, farmers, or ranchers, except for small aquaculture enterprises.

EIDLs are available for working capital needs caused by the disaster and are available even if the business or PNP did not suffer any physical damage. The loans may be used to pay fixed debts, payroll, accounts payable and other bills not paid due to the disaster.

“Through a declaration by the U.S. Secretary of Agriculture, SBA provides critical financial assistance to help communities recover,” said Chris Stallings, associate administrator of the Office of Disaster Recovery and Resilience at the SBA. “We’re pleased to offer loans to small businesses and private nonprofits impacted by these disasters.”

The loan amount can be up to $2 million with interest rates as low as 4% for small businesses and 3.625% for PNPs, with terms up to 30 years. Interest does not accrue, and payments are not due until 12 months after the date of the first loan disbursement. The SBA sets loan amounts and terms based on each applicant’s financial condition.

To apply online, visit sba.gov/disaster. Applicants may also call SBA’s Customer Service Center at (800) 659-2955 or email disastercustomerservice@sba.gov for more information on SBA disaster assistance. For people who are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access telecommunications relay services.

Submit completed loan applications to SBA no later than Dec. 15.

###

About the U.S. Small Business Administration

The U.S. Small Business Administration helps power the American dream of business ownership. As the only go-to resource and voice for small businesses backed by the strength of the federal government, the SBA empowers entrepreneurs and small business owners with the resources and support they need to start, grow, expand their businesses, or recover from a declared disaster. It delivers services through an extensive network of SBA field offices and partnerships with public and private organizations. To learn more, visit www.sba.gov.

MIL OSI USA News –

April 22, 2025

MIL-OSI USA: SBA Relief Still Available to Santa Clara Pueblo Private Nonprofits Affected by June Storms

Source: United States Small Business Administration

SACRAMENTO, Calif. – The U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) is reminding eligible private nonprofit (PNP) organizations in the Santa Clara Pueblo of the May 20, deadline to apply for low interest federal disaster loans to offset economic losses caused by the severe storms and flooding occurring June 20–21, 2024.

The disaster declaration covers the Santa Clara Pueblo in New Mexico.

Under this declaration, SBA’s Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) program is available to PNPs providing non-critical services of a governmental nature who suffered financial losses directly related to the disaster. Examples of eligible non-critical PNPs include, but are not limited to, food kitchens, homeless shelters, museums, libraries, community centers, schools and colleges.

EIDLs are available for working capital needs caused by the disaster and are available even if the PNP did not suffer any physical damage. The loans may be used to pay fixed debts, payroll, accounts payable and other bills not paid due to the disaster.

“SBA loans help eligible small businesses and private nonprofits cover operating expenses after a disaster, which is crucial for their recovery,” said Chris Stallings, associate administrator of the Office of Disaster Recovery and Resilience at the SBA. “These loans not only help business owners get back on their feet but also play a key role in sustaining local economies in the aftermath of a disaster.”

The loan amount can be up to $2 million with interest rates as low as 3.25% and terms up to 30 years. Interest does not accrue, and payments are not due, until 12 months from the date of the first loan disbursement. The SBA sets loan amounts and terms based on each applicant’s financial condition.

To apply online, visit sba.gov/disaster. Applicants may also call SBA’s Customer Service Center at (800) 659-2955 or email disastercustomerservice@sba.gov for more information on SBA disaster assistance. For people who are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access telecommunications relay services.

Submit completed loan applications to the SBA no later than May 20.

###

About the U.S. Small Business Administration

The U.S. Small Business Administration helps power the American dream of business ownership. As the only go-to resource and voice for small businesses backed by the strength of the federal government, the SBA empowers entrepreneurs and small business owners with the resources and support they need to start, grow, expand their businesses, or recover from a declared disaster. It delivers services through an extensive network of SBA field offices and partnerships with public and private organizations. To learn more, visit www.sba.gov.

MIL OSI USA News –

April 22, 2025

MIL-OSI USA: SBA Relief Still Available to Texas Private Nonprofits Affected by Hurricane Beryl

Source: United States Small Business Administration

SACRAMENTO, Calif. – The U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) is reminding eligible private nonprofit (PNP) organizations in Texas of the May 21, deadline to apply for a low interest federal disaster loan to offset economic injury caused by Hurricane Beryl occurring July 5-9, 2024.

The disaster declaration covers the Texas counties of Angelina, Austin, Brazoria, Calhoun, Chambers, Colorado, Fort Bend, Galveston, Hardin, Harris, Jackson, Jasper, Liberty, Matagorda, Montgomery, Nacogdoches, Newton, Polk, Sabine, San Augustine, San Jacinto, Shelby, Trinity, Tyler, Walker, Waller, Washington and Wharton.

Under this declaration, SBA’s Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) program is available to PNPs providing non-critical services of a governmental nature who suffered financial losses directly related to the disaster. Examples of eligible non-critical PNPs include, but are not limited to, food kitchens, homeless shelters, museums, libraries, community centers, schools and colleges.

EIDLs are available for working capital needs caused by the disaster and are available even if the PNP did not suffer any physical damage. The loans may be used to pay fixed debts, payroll, accounts payable and other bills not paid due to the disaster.

“SBA loans help eligible small businesses and private nonprofits cover operating expenses after a disaster, which is crucial for their recovery,” said Chris Stallings, associate administrator of the Office of Disaster Recovery and Resilience at the SBA. “These loans not only help business owners get back on their feet but also play a key role in sustaining local economies in the aftermath of a disaster.”

The loan amount can be up to $2 million with interest rates as low as 3.25% and terms up to 30 years. Interest does not accrue, and payments are not due, until 12 months from the date of the first loan disbursement. The SBA sets loan amounts and terms based on each applicant’s financial condition.

To apply online, visit sba.gov/disaster. Applicants may also call SBA’s Customer Service Center at (800) 659-2955 or email disastercustomerservice@sba.gov for more information on SBA disaster assistance. For people who are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access telecommunications relay services.

Submit completed loan applications to the SBA no later than May 21.

###

About the U.S. Small Business Administration

The U.S. Small Business Administration helps power the American dream of business ownership. As the only go-to resource and voice for small businesses backed by the strength of the federal government, the SBA empowers entrepreneurs and small business owners with the resources and support they need to start, grow, expand their businesses, or recover from a declared disaster. It delivers services through an extensive network of SBA field offices and partnerships with public and private organizations. To learn more, visit www.sba.gov.

MIL OSI USA News –

April 22, 2025

MIL-OSI USA: SBA Relief Still Available to Nebraska Private Nonprofits Affected by May Storms

Source: United States Small Business Administration

SACRAMENTO, Calif. – The U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) is reminding eligible private nonprofit (PNP) organizations in Nebraska of the May 20, deadline to apply for low interest federal disaster loans to offset economic losses caused by the severe storms, straight‑line winds, tornadoes and flooding occurring May 20–June 3, 2024.

The disaster declaration covers the Nebraska counties of Burt, Butler, Colfax, Dodge, Douglas, Dundy, Fillmore, Hamilton, Hayes, Hitchcock, Howard, Keith, Lincoln, Platte, Polk, Red Willow, Sarpy, Saunders and Washington.

Under this declaration, SBA’s Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) program is available to PNPs providing non-critical services of a governmental nature who suffered financial losses directly related to the disaster. Examples of eligible non-critical PNPs include, but are not limited to, food kitchens, homeless shelters, museums, libraries, community centers, schools and colleges.

EIDLs are available for working capital needs caused by the disaster and are available even if the PNP did not suffer any physical damage. The loans may be used to pay fixed debts, payroll, accounts payable and other bills not paid due to the disaster.

“SBA loans help eligible small businesses and private nonprofits cover operating expenses after a disaster, which is crucial for their recovery,” said Chris Stallings, associate administrator of the Office of Disaster Recovery and Resilience at the SBA. “These loans not only help business owners get back on their feet but also play a key role in sustaining local economies in the aftermath of a disaster.”

The loan amount can be up to $2 million with interest rates as low as 3.25% and terms up to 30 years. Interest does not accrue, and payments are not due, until 12 months from the date of the first loan disbursement. The SBA sets loan amounts and terms based on each applicant’s financial condition.

The SBA encourages applicants to submit their loan applications promptly. Applications will be prioritized in the order they are received, and the SBA remains committed to processing them as efficiently as possible.

To apply online, visit sba.gov/disaster. Applicants may also call SBA’s Customer Service Center at (800) 659-2955 or email disastercustomerservice@sba.gov for more information on SBA disaster assistance. For people who are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access telecommunications relay services.

Submit completed loan applications to the SBA no later than May 20.

###

About the U.S. Small Business Administration

The U.S. Small Business Administration helps power the American dream of business ownership. As the only go-to resource and voice for small businesses backed by the strength of the federal government, the SBA empowers entrepreneurs and small business owners with the resources and support they need to start, grow, expand their businesses, or recover from a declared disaster. It delivers services through an extensive network of SBA field offices and partnerships with public and private organizations. To learn more, visit www.sba.gov.

MIL OSI USA News –

April 22, 2025

MIL-OSI Security: Walgreens Agrees To Pay Up to $350M for Illegally Filling Unlawful Opioid Prescriptions and Submitting False Claims

Source: Office of United States Attorneys

WASHINGTON — The Justice Department, together with the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (HHS-OIG), today announced a $300 million settlement with Walgreens Boots Alliance, Walgreen Co., and various subsidiaries (collectively, Walgreens) to resolve allegations that the national chain pharmacy illegally filled millions of invalid prescriptions for opioids and other controlled substances in violation of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) and then sought payment for many of those invalid prescriptions by Medicare and other federal health care programs in violation of the False Claims Act (FCA). The settlement amount is based on Walgreens’s ability to pay. Walgreens will owe the United States an additional $50 million if the company is sold, merged, or transferred prior to fiscal year 2032.

The government’s complaint, filed on Jan. 16 and amended April 18 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, alleges that from approximately August 2012 through March 1, 2023, Walgreens, one of the nation’s largest pharmacy chains, knowingly filled millions of unlawful controlled substance prescriptions. These unlawful prescriptions included prescriptions for excessive quantities of opioids, opioid prescriptions filled significantly early, and prescriptions for the especially dangerous and abused combination of three drugs known as a “trinity.” Walgreens pharmacists allegedly filled these prescriptions despite clear red flags indicating a high likelihood that the prescriptions were invalid because they lacked a legitimate medical purpose or were not issued in the usual course of professional practice.

The complaint further alleges that Walgreens pressured its pharmacists to fill prescriptions quickly and without taking the time needed to confirm that each prescription was lawful. Walgreens’s compliance officials also allegedly ignored substantial evidence that its stores were dispensing unlawful prescriptions and even intentionally deprived its own pharmacists of crucial information, including by refusing to share internal data regarding prescribers with pharmacists and preventing pharmacists from warning one another about certain problematic prescribers.

In light of the settlement, the United States has moved to dismiss its complaint. Walgreens will also move to dismiss a related declaratory judgment action filed in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.

“Pharmacies have a legal responsibility to prescribe controlled substances in a safe and professional manner, not dispense dangerous drugs just for profit,” said Attorney General Pamela Bondi. “This Department of Justice is committed to ending the opioid crisis and holding bad actors accountable for their failure to protect patients from addiction.”

“This settlement resolves allegations that, for years, Walgreens failed to meet its obligations when dispensing dangerous opioids and other drugs,” said Deputy Assistant Attorney General Michael Granston of the Justice Department’s Civil Division. “We will continue to hold accountable those entities and individuals whose actions contributed to the opioid crisis, whether through illegal prescribing, marketing, dispensing or distributing activities.”

“Importantly, Walgreens’s agreements with the DEA and HHS-OIG provide swift relief in the form of monitoring and claims review that will improve Walgreens’s practices immediately,” said U.S. Attorney Andrew S. Boutros for the Northern District of Illinois. “Our office will continue to work with our law enforcement partners to ensure that opioids are properly dispensed and that taxpayer funds are only spent on legitimate pharmacy claims.”

“This landmark civil settlement is the largest Controlled Substances Act resolution in our district’s history and once again confirms the high priority our office has placed upon confronting those responsible for the opioid crisis here,” said U.S. Attorney Gregory W. Kehoe for the Middle District of Florida. “We are grateful for the energy and collaborative spirit brought to this effort by our colleagues in the DEA, the Department of Justice Civil Frauds Section and Consumer Protection Branch, and the United States Attorneys’ Offices for the Northern District of Illinois, District of Maryland, Eastern District of New York, and Eastern District of Virginia.”

“With the power to dispense potentially harmful substances comes the responsibility to ensure that every prescription is legitimate before it is filled,” said U.S. Attorney Kelly O. Hayes for the District of Maryland. “When pharmacies fail that responsibility, this office will work with others across the country to hold accountable those who put patients and communities at risk.”

“This settlement holds Walgreens accountable for failing to comply with its critical responsibility to prevent the diversion of opioids and other controlled substances,” said U.S. Attorney John J. Durham for the Eastern District of New York. “The settlement also underscores our office’s continued commitment to ensure that all persons and businesses that fill controlled-substance prescriptions adhere to the requirements of the Controlled Substances Act that are designed to prevent highly addictive medications from being used for illegitimate purposes.”

“Strict compliance with the law is essential to safeguarding the public, who rely on carefully considered and limited prescriptions for their health and wellbeing,” said U.S. Attorney Erik S. Siebert for the Eastern District of Virginia. “Those companies and individuals authorized to provide controlled substances have a professional responsibility to ensure that the prescriptions they fill are within the course of professional practice and regulations. Medically unnecessary prescriptions are a cost ultimately borne by the taxpayers and consumers. As we continue to address the opioid crisis here in Virginia and across the nation, we are determined to ensure pharmacies and pharmacists operate within the law.”

In addition to the monetary payments announced today, Walgreens has entered into agreements with DEA and HHS-OIG to address its future obligations in dispensing controlled substances. Walgreens and DEA entered into a memorandum of agreement that requires the company to implement and maintain certain compliance measures for the next seven years. Walgreens must maintain policies and procedures requiring pharmacists to confirm the validity of controlled substance prescriptions prior to dispensing controlled substances, provide annual training to pharmacy employees regarding their legal obligations relating to controlled substances, verify that pharmacy staffing is sufficient to enable pharmacy employees to comply with those legal obligations, and maintain a system for blocking prescriptions from prescribers whom Walgreens becomes aware are writing illegitimate controlled substance prescriptions. Walgreens has also entered into a five-year Corporate Integrity Agreement with HHS-OIG, which further requires Walgreens to establish and maintain a compliance program that includes written policies and procedures, training, board oversight, and periodic reporting to HHS-OIG related to Walgreens’s dispensing of controlled substances.

“Pharmacies have an obligation to ensure that every prescription for highly addictive controlled substances is legitimate and issued responsibly in compliance with the Controlled Substances Act,” said DEA Acting Administrator Derek Maltz. “When one of the nation’s largest pharmacies fails at this obligation, they jeopardize the health and safety of their customers and place the American public in danger. The DEA remains committed to protecting all Americans from unscrupulous practices that prioritize profit over patient safety.”

“Pharmacies that neglect their legal duties and their critical role in delivering safe and appropriate medications to enrollees of federal health care programs, and instead exploit these programs for market advantage, squander taxpayer dollars and put patient safety at risk,” said Acting Inspector General Juliet T. Hodgkins of HHS-OIG. “HHS-OIG and our law enforcement partners will use every tool in our arsenal to prevent these outcomes. This settlement and corporate integrity agreement reflect HHS-OIG’s commitment to ensuring compliance, correcting failures in oversight, and protecting the foundation of federally-funded health care.”

“In the midst of the opioid crisis that has plagued our nation, we rely on pharmacies to prevent not facilitate the unlawful distribution of these potentially harmful substances,” said Norbert E. Vint, Deputy Inspector General Performing the Duties of the Inspector General at OPM OIG. “We applaud our investigative staff, law enforcement partners, and partners at the Department of Justice for their hard work and unwavering commitment to protecting patients from harm.”

The civil settlement resolves four cases brought under the qui tam, or whistleblower, provisions of the FCA by former Walgreens employees. The FCA authorizes whistleblowers to sue on behalf of the United States and receive a share of any recovery. It also permits the United States to intervene and take over such lawsuits, as it did here. The relators will receive a 17.25% share of the government’s FCA recovery in this matter.

The United States’ pursuit of this matter underscores the government’s commitment to combating health care fraud. One of the most powerful tools in this effort is the False Claims Act. Tips and complaints from all sources about potential fraud, waste, abuse, and mismanagement can be reported to HHS-OIG, at 800-HHS-TIPS (800-447-8477).

The DEA, HHS-OIG, Defense Criminal Investigative Service, Defense Health Agency (DHA), Office of Personnel Management (OPM), Department of Labor (DOL) Office of Inspector General, Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), Office of Inspector General, FBI Chicago Field Office, and the U.S. Attorneys’ Offices for the District of Colorado, Southern District of California, Eastern District of California, Northern District of California, Eastern District of Washington, Southern District of Alabama, Southern District of Illinois, Central District of Illinois, District of Arizona, Western District of Texas, Northern District of Texas, District of Puerto Rico, and Eastern District of Louisianaprovided substantial assistance in the investigation.

The United States is represented in this matter by attorneys from the Justice Department’s Civil Division Consumer Protection Branch (Assistant Director Amy DeLine and Trial Attorney Nicole Frazer) and Commercial Litigation Branch, Fraud Section (Assistant Director Natalie Waites and Trial Attorney Joshua Barron), as well as from the U.S. Attorneys’ Offices for the Northern District of Illinois (Assistant U.S. Attorney Valerie R. Raedy), Middle District of Florida (Chief of the Civil Division Randy Harwell and Assistant U.S. Attorney Carolyn Tapie), District of Maryland (Chief of the Civil Division Thomas Corcoran), Eastern District of New York (Assistant U.S. Attorney Elliot M. Schachner) and Eastern District of Virginia (Assistant U.S. Attorney John Beerbower). Fraud Section senior financial analyst Karen Sharp provided support for the matter.

The claims asserted against defendants are allegations only and there has been no determination of liability.

MIL Security OSI –

April 22, 2025

MIL-OSI USA: Padilla, Lieu, Carbajal Announce Transformative Legislation to Address Affordable Housing and Homelessness Crises

US Senate News:

Source: United States Senator Alex Padilla (D-Calif.)

Padilla, Lieu, Carbajal Announce Transformative Legislation to Address Affordable Housing and Homelessness Crises

Housing for All Act would invest in proven solutions to address affordable housing shortages and provide historic level of federal funding for existing programs and innovative solutions to keep people housed and reduce homelessness
CALIFORNIA — Today, U.S. Senator Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) and Representatives Ted Lieu (D-Calif.-36) and Salud Carbajal (D-Calif.-24) announced the reintroduction of the Housing for All Act, a comprehensive approach to address the homelessness and affordable housing crises in California and across the nation. The legislation would invest in proven solutions to address affordable housing shortages and provide a historic level of federal funding for both existing programs to reduce homelessness and innovative, locally developed solutions to help vulnerable populations experiencing homelessness.
As the Trump Administration undermines and defunds critical housing services across the country — including illegal staff cuts at the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and potential closures of nearly two-thirds of HUD field offices nationwide — investments to boost the affordable housing stock and reduce homelessness are essential. The investments in the Housing for All Act would build on the creative solutions that cities and states across California have successfully developed to help combat the housing and homelessness crises.
“Housing is a basic human right, not a privilege. As the Trump Administration callously cuts essential housing programs and resources that Americans across the country depend on, our Housing for All Act is a blueprint for building upon locally developed solutions and providing necessary federal investments to finally treat the homelessness and affordable housing crises with the seriousness they deserve,” said Senator Padilla. “For far too long, the lack of affordable housing has hurt Americans nationwide and disproportionately harmed low-income communities and communities of color. Community leaders across California know that we have the tools to end homelessness and lower the cost of housing for Americans, but we need significant federal investments to scale up creative and effective housing solutions. I won’t stop this fight until every person has a place to call home.”
“Housing and homelessness are two significant crises we face today,” said Representative Lieu. “There is not enough affordable housing in California and across this country. Everyday Americans can work more than one job, and it’s still not enough to afford safe and stable housing. This is unacceptable. It’s time we finally invest in the proven, community-driven solutions that combat homelessness and create more affordable housing. I’m pleased to partner with Senator Padilla and Congressman Carbajal to introduce legislation that meets the urgency of this moment and helps get more people into homes.”
“Homes have been too expensive for far too long,” said Representative Carbajal. “While we have the tools to address this crisis, the challenge has always been scale. The Housing For All Act will make historic investments in programs addressing housing and homelessness–including my Safe Parking legislation–to ensure every American has a roof over their head.”
The lack of affordable housing access and the population of individuals experiencing homelessness are growing crises impacting Americans nationwide, disproportionately hurting communities of color and low-income communities. In the United States, over 770,000 individuals and families experience homelessness annually, and significantly more Americans face housing insecurity. According to the National Low Income Housing Coalition’s recent Out of Reach 2024 Report, no state or county exists where a person working 40 hours a week and earning the state or local minimum wage can afford to rent a modest two-bedroom apartment. In fact, the average minimum wage earner would need to work 113 hours per week — nearly three full-time jobs — to afford a two-bedroom rental home.
The Housing for All Act would take an all-hands-on-deck approach to combat these crises, including investments from the federal government in housing solutions. Specifically, the bill would:
Address the affordable housing shortage by investing in the National Housing Trust Fund, the HOME Investment Partnerships program, the Section 202 Supportive Housing for the Elderly Program, and the Section 811 Supportive Housing for People with Disabilities;
Address the homelessness crisis by investing in Housing Choice Vouchers, Project-Based Rental Assistance, the emergency solutions grant program (which helps with street outreach, rapid re-housing assistance, emergency shelter, and homelessness prevention), and Continuums of Care;
Support innovative, locally developed approaches to these crises by investing in hotel and motel conversions to permanent supportive housing with supportive services, the Eviction Protection Grant Program to support experienced legal service providers in providing legal assistance to low-income tenants at risk of or subject to eviction, mobile crisis intervention teams to help those with medical or psychological needs get the care that they need, programs that offer a safe place to park overnight and facilitate access to rehousing services and essential services, library programs that support people experiencing homelessness, inclusive transit-oriented development and infill development, and improved coordination of culturally competent, trauma-informed behavioral health and homelessness services.
Senators Cory Booker (D-N.J.), Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii), Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.), Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.), Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii), Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), and Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) are cosponsoring the bill in the Senate.
Representatives Yassamin Ansari (D-Ariz.-03), Nanette Barragán (D-Calif.-44), Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick (D-Fla.-20), Cleo Fields (D-La.-06), Jimmy Gomez (D-Calif.-34), Hank Johnson (D-Ga.-04), Seth Magaziner (D-R.I.-02), LaMonica Mclver (D-N.J.-10), Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-D.C.-AL), Jimmy Panetta (D-Calif.-19), Delia Ramirez (D-Ill.-03), Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.-09), Lateefah Simon (D-Calif.-12), and Shri Thanedar (D-Mich.-13) are cosponsoring the bill in the House.
The Housing for All Act of 2025 has been endorsed by organizations and stakeholders including the National Alliance to End Homelessness; National Low Income Housing Coalition (NLIHC); LeadingAge; National Rural Housing Coalition; UnidosUS; US Conference of Mayors; Corporation for Supportive Housing; Covenant House; Liberation in a Generation; American Library Association; Self-Help Enterprises; California Housing Partnership; California League of Cities; California State Association of Counties; County Welfare Directors Association of California; Center for Law and Social Policy; California Business, Consumer Services and Housing (BCSH) Agency; and more.
“At a time when more households than ever are struggling to make ends meet, and the number of people experiencing homelessness has reached record levels, we must keep up the fight for the resources needed to ensure everyone has a safe, stable, affordable, and accessible place to call home,” said NLIHC Interim President and CEO Renee Willis. “I applaud Senator Padilla for his leadership on the ‘Housing for All Act,’ which would provide bold, long-term solutions required to address the nation’s affordable housing and homelessness crisis at its root.”
“Senator Padilla’s Housing for All Act recognizes the extraordinary work performed by local homelessness systems and would provide them with robust resources, including significant new investments in the Continuum of Care and Emergency Solutions Grants programs as well as Housing Choice Vouchers and Project-Based Rental Assistance,” said Steve Berg, Chief Policy Officer at the National Alliance to End Homelessness. “In addition to providing resources, Senator Padilla’s legislation would promote innovative policies like using motels and hotels for permanent supportive housing and specific efforts to help house the growing numbers of individuals and families experiencing vehicular homelessness. In introducing the Housing for All Act, the Senator is meeting the moment–and his legislation should inspire policymakers in the legislative and executive branches.”
“The Housing for All Act is a common sense, critically needed response to our country’s shortage of affordable homes—particularly for low-income older adults,” said Katie Smith Sloan, President & CEO, LeadingAge, the Association of Nonprofit Providers of Aging Services. “Our nonprofit members have years-long waiting lists—which means that many low-income older adults die before receiving relief in the form of an available, federally assisted house. The programs and policies supported by Senator Padilla’s bill will reverse course on record levels of housing unaffordability: for example, its authorization of $2.5 billion for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s Section 202 Supportive Housing for the Elderly program would build new, service-connected affordable homes for older adults with average annual incomes below $17,000 a year. For these older adults, the private market alone has not, cannot, and will not solve the affordable housing shortage. As Senator Padilla makes clear, public resources are critically needed. LeadingAge enthusiastically supports the Housing for All Act.”
“The California Housing Partnership enthusiastically supports Senator Padilla’s Housing for All Act providing expanded federal resources to counteract the acute shortage of affordable homes, which in California has been pushing families and individuals into overcrowded situations and risking homelessness amidst the pandemic,” said Matt Schwartz, President and CEO of the California Housing Partnership.
“Now is the time to strengthen the commitment to programs that are successful in preventing and reducing homelessness as well as increase collaboration between federal, state, county, and city governments,” said Jeff Griffiths, Inyo County Supervisor and California State Association of Counties (CSAC) President. “Senator Padilla’s Housing for All Act would accomplish these goals. CSAC and California’s counties strongly support this legislation, and are grateful for his leadership.”
“The County Welfare Directors Association of California (CWDA) is proud to once again stand in support of Senator Padilla’s Housing For All legislation,” said Carlos Marquez III, CWDA Executive Director. “Every day, California’s 58 county human services agencies work to stabilize and rapidly rehouse older adults, former foster youth, families experiencing poverty, and others at high risk of homelessness, but our efforts are limited by a lack of investment in affordable housing and in evidence-based strategies that get people off the street. Senator Padilla’s Housing For All legislation will enable counties to scale what works and provide immediate solutions to our housing crisis.”
“Cal Cities is proud to support the Housing for All Act, which would provide critical funding to connect our unhoused residents to services and keep Californians in their homes,” said League of California Cities Executive Director and CEO Carolyn Coleman. “We all know there’s more work to be done to address the housing and homelessness crisis in our state and that every level of government has a role to play in finding a meaningful path forward. Senator Padilla’s bill will strengthen the partnership between all levels of government by investing in the diversity of solutions that cities throughout the state are carrying out to support vulnerable residents.”
“We’re grateful for Senator Padilla’s leadership in advancing legislation that would provide comprehensive resources to address the housing and homelessness challenges facing California and across the country,” said Business, Consumer Services and Housing Agency Secretary Tomiquia Moss. “California has made significant investments, but we know real, sustained progress will require every level of government working together.”
Senator Padilla believes everyone deserves access to affordable and safe housing and recognizes the need to drastically increase the affordable housing stock to address the homelessness crisis facing California and the country. Last week, Padilla introduced the bipartisan Housing Unhoused Disabled Veterans Act to ensure veterans experiencing homelessness and receiving disability payments maintain access to crucial housing support. In the aftermath of the Los Angeles fires, Padilla introduced the bipartisan Disaster Housing Reform for American Families Act to expedite, expand, and improve temporary housing available to victims of disasters like wildfires and storms.
Padilla has fought against the Trump Administration’s proposals to cut HUD staff and field offices who help provide crucial housing services. Padilla and U.S. Representative Emanuel Cleaver, II (D-Mo.-05) recently led more than 100 Democrats in the Senate and House in condemning staffing cuts and potential closures of HUD field offices across the country. Earlier this year, Senator Padilla sounded the alarm that these wide-ranging cuts would hamper HUD’s ability to support vulnerable communities and address the housing and homelessness crises.
A one-pager on the bill is available here.
A section-by-section summary of the bill is available here.
Full text of the bill is available here.

MIL OSI USA News –

April 22, 2025

MIL-OSI USA: Cantwell Hears From Healthcare Providers in Wenatchee: Medicaid Cuts Would be Devastating

US Senate News:

Source: United States Senator for Washington Maria Cantwell

04.21.25

Cantwell Hears From Healthcare Providers in Wenatchee: Medicaid Cuts Would be Devastating

Cantwell continues tour of WA to fight back against proposed Medicaid cuts; Cantwell reports highlight impacts to WA State health care if GOP cuts Medicaid to pay for lower taxes for the ultra-wealthy

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Last week, U.S. Senator Maria Cantwell (D-WA), senior member of the Senate Finance Committee and ranking member of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, heard from health care providers in the Wenatchee Valley about the dangers of cuts to Medicaid being considered by Republican lawmakers.

At an April 17 roundtable hosted by U.S. Representative Kim Schrier (D, WA-08) and joined by Sen. Cantwell, health care providers warned that such cuts would devastate the region’s health care system and limit access to lifesaving care.

Cutting Medicaid, Sen. Cantwell said, “affects the programs, then affects the hospital, then it affects the workforce, then you end up with shortages, then you end up with deserts. Then you end up with, ‘Who wants to have a business there?’ It keeps cascading,” Sen. Cantwell said. “This is a crazy idea. This is not a sledge hammer — this is like a ticking time bomb that’s blowing up the foundation of the system. And we have to take your stories and go back [to D.C.] and convince these people that it’s not even worth thinking about.”

Wenatchee marked the fourth stop in Sen. Cantwell’s tour around the state to hear from folks who would be directly impacted by cuts to Medicare. Last month, Sen. Cantwell heard from voices across Washington state about the dangers of President Trump and the GOP’s proposed cuts to Medicaid. Doctors, patients, and health care providers in Seattle, Spokane, and the Tri-Cities warned that such cuts would devastate Washington state’s health care system and limit access to lifesaving care.

WATCH:

FOX 13 Seattle: WA health leaders join Sen. Cantwell against proposed Medicaid cuts

KREM 2 Spokane: Spokane doctors, patients speak at Medicaid roundtable hosted by Sen. Cantwell

KAPP 35 Tri-Cities: MARIA CANTWELL: How proposed cuts to Medicaid could impact South Central Washington

In February, Sen. Cantwell released a snapshot report highlighting the impact that slashing Medicaid to fund tax cuts for corporations and the ultra-wealthy would have on Washington state’s health care system — especially in Central and Eastern Washington. In March, Sen. Cantwell released a second snapshot report highlighting impacts on the Seattle-area health care delivery system.

READ MORE:

The Seattle Times: Cuts to Medicaid would hurt WA’s children, poor

The Spokesman Review: Medicaid could be on chopping block after Northwest Republicans help pass House budget measure

The Tri-City Herald: Newhouse backs House GOP budget plan that could lead to cuts for Tri-Cities Medicaid users

Medicaid is the federal program that insures many low-income adults and children, pregnant people, seniors, and people with disabilities. Washington state’s Medicaid program, Apple Health, ensures that eligible Washingtonians can afford to seek health care and see providers when they need to. The program also ensures that hospitals — which are required to treat everyone, regardless of their ability to pay — receive reimbursements for the significant number of low-income people they serve. Over 1.9 million Washingtonians are enrolled in Apple Health.

The House of Representatives has passed a budget resolution that would necessitate $880 billion in cuts from the House Energy and Commerce Committee, which has jurisdiction over Medicaid. Supporters of the bill claim that the text includes no mention of Medicaid — however, the extent of the cuts required by the legislation would mean that the committee has essentially no other options other than to hack away at Medicaid.

Video of yesterday’s roundtable in Wenatchee is HERE; photos are HERE; and a transcript of Sen. Cantwell’s opening and closing remarks are HERE.

MIL OSI USA News –

April 22, 2025

MIL-OSI: FHLBank San Francisco’s Jennifer Schachterle to Discuss Letters of Credit at 2025 California Municipal Treasurers Association Annual Conference

Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

SAN FRANCISCO, April 21, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — The Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco (FHLBank San Francisco) announced Jennifer Schachterle, senior vice president of sales and business development, is scheduled to speak on a panel focused on letters of credit during the 2025 California Municipal Treasurers Association (CMTA) annual conference on April 24 in Monterey, California.

During the conference attended by local government officials with fiduciary responsibility for public funds, Schachterle will discuss how letters of credit can be a secure and efficient way for municipalities to make sure that deposits are covered over insured limits and serve as a favorable alternative to other forms of credit risk management.

“Municipal letters of credit issued by Federal Home Loan Banks to state and local governments can often be an effective tool to secure public fund deposits in excess of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and National Credit Union Insurance Fund limits,” said Schachterle. “I’m looking forward to connecting with attendees at the CMTA annual conference and joining my fellow panelists to share insights on this fast and efficient alternative form of collateral.”

On the panel, Schachterle will be joined by Denise de Bombelles, senior vice president, global investor relations with the Federal Home Loan Bank Office of Finance and Hubie White, CFA CTP, chief investment officer with the City and County of San Francisco, in a discussion for how municipal letters of credit can help safeguard public unit deposits.

The 2025 CMTA Annual Conference is taking place April 22-25, 2025, at the Hyatt Regency Monterey Hotel and Spa in Monterey, California.

Jennifer Schachterle joined FHLBank San Francisco in June 2023 as SVP of Sales and Business Development. She leads a team dedicated to sales, business development and new member recruitment and oversees relationships with the Bank’s over 330-member financial institutions across its three-state district of Arizona, California, and Nevada. Ms. Schachterle has experience in the areas of sales, credit risk, counterparty approval, policy, and mortgage acquisition. Over the course of her more than 25 years in banking, Schachterle has held positions of increasing seniority in operations, credit, and sales in the banking and mortgage finance industry. Since 2019, she has served on the board of directors for the California Mortgage Bankers Association. She has a degree from the University of Denver and enjoys volunteering to teach children financial literacy.

Visit FHLBank San Francisco for more information about letters of credit and learn which member banks and credit unions are available to issue letters of credit.

About Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco

The Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco is a member-driven cooperative helping local lenders in Arizona, California, and Nevada build strong communities, create opportunity, and change lives for the better. The tools and resources we provide to our member financial institutions — commercial banks, credit unions, industrial loan companies, savings institutions, insurance companies, and community development financial institutions — propel homeownership, finance quality affordable housing, drive economic vitality, and revitalize whole neighborhoods. Together with our members and other partners, we are making the communities we serve more vibrant and resilient.

The MIL Network –

April 22, 2025

MIL-OSI USA: Promoting a Healthier California: Attorney General Bonta Announces New Funding Available for Local Public Agencies Through the 2025-2026 Tobacco Grant Program

Source: US State of California

Funding helps combat the illegal sale of tobacco products to youth

OAKLAND — California Attorney General Rob Bonta today announced that the California Department of Justice (DOJ) is now accepting proposals for the 2025-2026 Tobacco Grant Program, which will provide approximately $28.5 million in grant funding to eligible local agencies. The program aims to reduce the illegal sale of tobacco products, including e-cigarettes, to our youth. Any local public agency within the State of California that has authority to enforce tobacco-related state laws or local ordinances related to retail tobacco sales and marketing is eligible to apply. This may include police and sheriffs’ departments, district and city attorneys and county counsels, public health departments, cities, counties, and public school/college districts. Information on the application process is available at oag.ca.gov/tobaccogrants. DOJ will also hold a Zoom webinar on Wednesday, April 30 at 10:00 AM PT to provide guidance to those interested in applying for the Tobacco Grant Program. To RSVP for the webinar, please click here.

“At the California Department of Justice, we are committed to protecting our youth from the dangers posed by tobacco products. The reality is that, especially in recent years, companies have been aggressively going after our young people and attempting to turn as many of them as possible into regular customers,” said Attorney General Bonta. “I encourage local agencies to apply to the Tobacco Grant Program — it is a critical tool that allows us to collaborate and hold accountable those companies and individuals who violate our laws around tobacco products.”

Companies target our youth by making and marketing tobacco products with a myriad of kid-friendly flavors and loading those products with nicotine, a highly addictive chemical that harms the developing brains of children and young adults. Surveys show flavored tobacco products remain the products of choice for young people. In 2024, among students reporting current e-cigarette use, 87.6% used flavored products. Tobacco usage during adolescence increases the risk for lifelong nicotine addiction and adverse health consequences.

DOJ’s Tobacco Grant Program aims to reduce childhood addiction to tobacco products by supporting local partners who:

Enforce the statewide flavor ban and similar local flavor ordinances.
Prosecute and penalize retailers who violate statewide and local tobacco laws, including those who sell or market tobacco products to youth under the age of 21, including over the internet.
Conduct retail inspections to ensure compliance.

The program is funded by Proposition 56, the California Healthcare, Research and Prevention Tobacco Tax Act of 2016. To date, the Tobacco Grant Program has distributed approximately $212 million in grant funding to approximately 470 grantees through a competitive process.

Attorney General Bonta remains committed to combating the illegal marketing and sale of tobacco products. Just this year, he announced a lawsuit against Flumgio Technology Inc., Berkeley Int’l Business Crew, and their founder, Mr. Zaoyu Zhu, for importing, marketing, and selling the popular FLUM brand e-cigarettes, which are illegal under California’s retail flavor ban and lack Food and Drug Administration authorization. He also announced lawsuits against two California online retailers of e-cigarettes, Ejuicesteals and E-juice Vapor, Inc., alleging that they engaged in unlawful remote sales of tobacco products and failed to verify the age of California consumers properly. Finally, Assembly Bill 3218 — his sponsored bill to help ensure the successful implementation of the flavored tobacco ban — was signed into law by Governor Gavin Newsom last year.

MIL OSI USA News –

April 22, 2025

MIL-OSI USA: Walgreens Agrees to Pay Up to $350M for Illegally Filling Unlawful Opioid Prescriptions and for Submitting False Claims to the Federal Government

Source: US State of California

Note: View settlement here.

The Justice Department, together with the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (HHS-OIG), today announced a $300 million settlement with Walgreens Boots Alliance, Walgreen Co., and various subsidiaries (collectively, Walgreens) to resolve allegations that the national chain pharmacy illegally filled millions of invalid prescriptions for opioids and other controlled substances in violation of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) and then sought payment for many of those invalid prescriptions by Medicare and other federal health care programs in violation of the False Claims Act (FCA). The settlement amount is based on Walgreens’s ability to pay. Walgreens will owe the United States an additional $50 million if the company is sold, merged, or transferred prior to fiscal year 2032.

The government’s complaint, filed on Jan. 16 and amended April 18 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, alleges that from approximately August 2012 through March 1, 2023, Walgreens, one of the nation’s largest pharmacy chains, knowingly filled millions of unlawful controlled substance prescriptions. These unlawful prescriptions included prescriptions for excessive quantities of opioids, opioid prescriptions filled significantly early, and prescriptions for the especially dangerous and abused combination of three drugs known as a “trinity.” Walgreens pharmacists allegedly filled these prescriptions despite clear red flags indicating a high likelihood that the prescriptions were invalid because they lacked a legitimate medical purpose or were not issued in the usual course of professional practice.

The complaint further alleges that Walgreens pressured its pharmacists to fill prescriptions quickly and without taking the time needed to confirm that each prescription was lawful. Walgreens’s compliance officials also allegedly ignored substantial evidence that its stores were dispensing unlawful prescriptions and even intentionally deprived its own pharmacists of crucial information, including by refusing to share internal data regarding prescribers with pharmacists and preventing pharmacists from warning one another about certain problematic prescribers.

In light of Friday’s settlement, the United States has moved to dismiss its complaint. Walgreens will also move to dismiss a related declaratory judgment action filed in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.