NewzIntel.com

    • Checkout Page
    • Contact Us
    • Default Redirect Page
    • Frontpage
    • Home-2
    • Home-3
    • Lost Password
    • Member Login
    • Member LogOut
    • Member TOS Page
    • My Account
    • NewzIntel Alert Control-Panel
    • NewzIntel Latest Reports
    • Post Views Counter
    • Privacy Policy
    • Public Individual Page
    • Register
    • Subscription Plan
    • Thank You Page

Category: Commerce

  • MIL-OSI USA: Wyden, Merkley Join 32 Senators on Bipartisan Legislation to Make High-Quality Job Training More Accessible

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Ron Wyden (D-Ore)
    February 11, 2025
    Washington, D.C. — U.S. Senators Ron Wyden and Jeff Merkley today joined their Senate colleagues in introducing bipartisan legislation that would make high-quality job training more accessible. 
    “The last thing hardworking students should have to worry about is not being able to afford a pathway to a successful career,” Wyden said. “No student should ever be denied the chance to work hard and get ahead. The JOBS Act would make the playing field fairer by giving low-income students the chance to pursue their dreams of securing a good paying job.” 
    “In order for every American to have a good-paying job, they need access to affordable, high-quality job training,” Merkley said. “As employers face critical shortages of skilled workers, too many people are still struggling to find opportunities that match their potential. The bipartisan JOBS Act is a win for our workforce, a win for our businesses, and a win for our economy.”
    The Jumpstarting Our Businesses by Supporting Students (JOBS) Act would allow students to use Pell Grants, need-based federal financial aid for undergraduates from low-income households, to pay for shorter-term job training programs. 
    Students now can only use Pell Grants for two-year and four-year colleges and universities. Students in shorter-term high-quality job training programs are ineligible for this crucial assistance. By expanding Pell Grant eligibility, the JOBS Act would allow students to have access to job training they might not be able to afford but that they need for careers in high-demand fields.
    There is also a skilled labor shortage that is expected to intensify in the coming years, in part because unemployed Americans lack access to the job training needed to fill vacant jobs. The JOBS Act would allow Pell Grants to be used for high-quality job training programs that are at least eight weeks long and lead to industry-recognized credentials or certificates. 
    In addition to Wyden and Merkley, the legislation is led by U.S. Senators Tim Kaine, D-Va., Susan Collins, R-Maine, Tina Smith, D-Minn., and Roger Marshal, R-Kan. and cosponsored by Tammy Baldwin, D-Wis., Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., Lisa Blunt Rochester D-Del., Cory Booker D-N.J., John Boozman, R-Ark., Shelley Moore Capito, R-W. V.a., Chris Coons, D-Del., Catherine Cortez Masto, D-Nev., Kevin Cramer, R-N.D., Steve Daines, R-Mont., Tammy Duckworth, D-Ill., Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., Maggie Hassan, D-N.H., Martin Heinrich, D-N.M., John Hickenlooper, D-Colo., John Hoeven, R-N.D., Cindy Hyde-Smith, R-Miss., Mark Kelly, D-Ariz., Angus King, I-Maine, Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., Jon Ossoff D-Ga., Gary Peters, D-Mich., Jacky Rosen, D-Nev., Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H., Dan Sullivan, D-Ark., Thom Tillis, R-N.C., Tommy Tuberville, R-Ala., Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., Mark R. Warner, D-Va., and Roger Wicker, R-Miss.
    The JOBS Act is endorsed by Advance CTE, the American Association of Community Colleges, the Association for Career and Technical Education , the Association of Community College Trustees, the Association of Equipment Manufacturers, Business Roundtable, the Center for Law and Social Policy , the Exhibitions and Conferences Alliance, Higher Learning Advocates, HP Inc., the Information Technology Industry Council, Jobs for the Future, the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies, NAF, the National Association of Workforce Boards, the National Association of Workforce Development Professionals, the National Skills Coalition, the Progressive Policy Institute, Rebuilding America’s Middle Class, and the Virginia Community College System.
    The text of the bill is here.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    February 12, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Nations: New UN relief chief takes office

    Source: United Nations MIL OSI

    18 November 2024 Humanitarian Aid

    Tom Fletcher, UN’s new chief of humanitarian affairs, took office on Monday, pledging to defend humanitarian values while navigating operations amid growing global crises.

    Mr. Fletcher, a former UK Ambassador and policy adviser to three British Prime Ministers, was appointed UN Under-Secretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs and Emergency Relief Coordinator by Secretary-General António Guterres last month.

    In his new role, he will also head the Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA).

    He succeeds Martin Griffiths, also from the UK, who stepped down at the end of June for health reasons. In the interim, Joyce Msuya, the Deputy Emergency Relief Coordinator, served as acting Under-Secretary-General.

    ‘No illusions’

    As the new top humanitarian official, Mr. Fletcher acknowledged that he is “under no illusion as to how tough this mission is.”

    “The impact on civilians of conflict, climate change, inequality and injustice is growing at a staggering rate,” he said.

    “I will defend our humanitarian movement and humanitarian values, and battle to make us more efficient, strategic, inclusive and innovative. We must win afresh the argument for international solidarity,” he added.

    Before his appointment, Mr. Fletcher was Principal of Hertford College, Oxford, and Vice Chair of Oxford University’s Conference of Colleges.

    He brings extensive experience in leading and transforming organizations, along with a strong background in diplomacy, having previously served as Global Strategy Director at the Global Business Coalition for Education, according to a UN biographical note.

    Mr. Fletcher also worked closely with the UN during his UK diplomatic career in Africa, the Middle East, and Europe, including as Head of the Middle East Peace Process at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO).

    MIL OSI United Nations News –

    February 12, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Ricketts Rebuts Elizabeth Warren’s False Claim That CFPB is Only Cop on the Beat: “We Ought Not to Try and Scare Consumers Right Now”

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Pete Ricketts (Nebraska)
    February 11, 2025
    WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senator Pete Ricketts (R-NE), a member of the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, rebutted a false claim by Ranking Member Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) is the only entity responsible for protecting consumers in the banking industry.
    “I want to address something that the Ranking Member started talking about, which was characterizing the CFPB as being the cop on the beat here,” Ricketts said. “But I can tell you, having been a Governor and having a Department of Banking that reported to me, that if any consumer would contact us and make a complaint about a bank, even a big bank like JP Morgan, we would investigate. As could the OCC, the FDIC, FTC. So to characterize it ‘no one is out there working for consumers’ is inaccurate. And we ought not to try and scare consumers right now that somehow this is the case.”
    During questioning of Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, Ricketts also highlighted his concerns about the expansion of the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet.
    [embedded content]
    “The Fed’s balance sheet at the end of 2019, so before the pandemic, was about $4.1 trillion,” Ricketts said. “By May of 2020, the Fed expanded that to $7 trillion, and by 2022, the Fed’s balance sheet hit an all-time record of $8.9 trillion. Inflation peaked at 9.1% that year, a high we had not seen since 1981. Now, I’m encouraged by the actions the Fed has taken with quantitative tightening, to shrink the balance sheet down to $6.85 trillion, but $6.85 trillion is still too high.”
    Ricketts’ comments came in a hearing of the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs entitled: “The Semiannual Monetary Policy Report to the Congress.”
    TRANSCRIPT:
    Senator Ricketts: “Well thank you, Mr. Chairman and Ranking Member for holding this important hearing and thank you Chairman Powell for being here today to talk about our economy and all of the things that are going on.
    “I want to address something that the Ranking Member started talking off about, which was characterizing the CFPB as being the cop on the beat here. But I can tell you, having been a governor and having a Department of Banking that reported to me, that if any consumer would contact us and make a complaint about a bank, even a big bank like JP Morgan, we would investigate, as could the OCC, FDIC, FTC.
    “So to characterize it ‘nobody’s out there looking for consumers,’ I think is inaccurate.
    “And we ought not to try and scare consumers right now that somehow, this is the case, because if you do have an issue, if you’re a consumer, please reach out to your state Department of Banking because those folks are going to look out for you.
    “I can tell you that because I used to have one of those Department of Banking, so they did a fantastic job of looking out for the consumers.
    “One of the things that has also impacted consumers is inflation. Prices under the Biden Administration were up 20%. An average household is paying $13,000 more today than they were for the same standard of living they had before Joe Biden got elected. We see that, grocery prices, for example, are up 22%, rents up 23%. Simply put, Nebraskans are economically worse off today than they were four years ago, and I expect that that’s part of the reason why we saw this change in the administration. They thought that that was not something that they wanted to continue to pursue. They didn’t want the same policies being followed. We have to end the reckless federal spending, rein in inflation and, you know, be responsible about how we make decisions to be able to grow the economy.
    “One of those areas that I’m concerned about is the expansion of the Fed balance sheet. The Fed’s balance sheet before, at the end of 2019, so before the pandemic was about $4.1 trillion. By May of 2020, the Fed expanded that to $7 trillion, and by 2022, the Fed’s balance sheet hit an all-time record of $8.9 trillion. Inflation peaked at 9.1% that year, a high we had not seen since 1981. Now, I’m encouraged by the actions the Fed has taken with quantitative tightening, to shrink the balance sheet down to $6.85 trillion, but $6.85 trillion is still too high. And one of my concerns with this, Chairman, is that, that’s kind of what are your tools, to be able to guard against a downturn in the economy or some sort of shock? Obviously used it during the pandemic. Looking ahead long term, will the Fed Reserve continue to this course of unwinding the balance sheet?”
    Chairman Jerome Powell: “Yeah. So, what we said is that we intend to slow and then stop the decline when reserve balances are somewhat above the level that we judge, consistent with so-called ample reserves. The most recent data and the feel of the markets is definitely the reserves are still abundant. They’re about the level that they were at when run off started because the, the run off is really happened out of the overnight repo facility, reverse repo. So yes, it’s, it’s an ongoing thing and we’re not, we’re not yet we’re where we’re headed.”
    Senator Ricketts: “So what kind of pace can we expect, and I know that obviously there’s going be a lot of factors like what happens to the economy over the course of next year, but if you were, if things were going to go along the way you are today, you’ve already said the economy’s doing well, inflation’s a little higher than we want it to be at 2.6%, but unemployment’s at 4%. If these conditions, and I think you use the word stable quite a bit, if these conditions were to remain stable throughout the course of the year, would you have a range to give us a where the balance you might be, if we were talking again here in January 2026?”
    Chairman Jerome Powell: “We basically we’re going to be, looking at reserve conditions, conditions in reserve markets, and trying to stop a little bit above what we consider ample. And we think we’re, you know, meaningfully above that now. We, we can’t put a number on it because you can’t directly know the demand for reserves other than by observing behavior in the market and then putting a little bit of a of a buffer on it. So I can’t give you an exact number. But for now, it’s ongoing and we have a ways to go.”
    Senator Ricketts: “What kind of conditions would happen, have to happen for you to start going back to quantitative easing?”
    Chairman Jerome Powell: “You know, so quantitative easing, so, you know, that’s a tool we, we tend to use when we’re at the effect of lower bound and we can’t cut interest rates anymore, so nothing like what you’re seeing in the current day. It’s a different test for stopping quantitative tightening, but we would use QE going forward only, only in a situation where when we’re rates are at zero and, you know, we’re a long way from zero now.”
    Senator Ricketts: “So that, you think that, again, just generally speaking, then if things remain stable, you’ll continue to unwind the balance sheet, you’ll continue to the quantitative tightening? Can’t give me a range on that, is that what I hear you saying?”
    Chairman Jerome Powell: “That’s right, that’s right.”
    Senator Ricketts: “Okay. Great. Well, I encourage you to keep doing that because, again, I think that’s important, to be able to make sure that you’ve got powder, for the next, issue that we may face. So, thank you very much. Mr. Chairman, I appreciate you being here.”

    MIL OSI USA News –

    February 12, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Nations: Stories from the UN Archive: Marian Anderson broke barriers with music and diplomacy

    Source: United Nations MIL OSI

    By Eileen Travers

    4 February 2025 Human Rights

    Marian Anderson, one of the most celebrated singers of the 20th century, once performed in the UN’s gilded General Assembly Hall in New York and also represented her country, the United States, as a delegate.

    Battling extensive racial prejudice, she broke many barriers, including as the first African American to perform with the Metropolitan Opera.

    UN Secretary-General Dag Hammarskjöld hailed her contributions to art and diplomacy, which live on in her legacy as an inspiration for generations to come.

    Watch UN Video’s latest Stories from the UN Archive episode below:

    Operatic hommage to human rights

    A distinguished alto, Ms. Andersen was a major presence on the diplomatic scene, including the 1950 commemoration held at New York’s Metropolitan Opera House for the second anniversary of the landmark UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

    Following her epic performance, she shared an A-list table, as shown in the archive photo below, with (from right to left) head of International Business Machines (IBM) Thomas Watson, former UN first lady and chair of the UN Commission on Human Rights Eleanor Roosevelt, General Assembly President Nasrollah Entezam, UN Secretary-General Trygve Lie and Jeannette Kittredge Watson.

    UN Photo

    Marian Anderson (far right) at an intermission on Human Rights Day at New York’s Metropolitan Opera House in 1950. (file)

    Cold war collaboration

    A staple in the UN conference rooms and at commemorations, Ms. Anderson joined Ezio Pinza, Danny Kaye and other stars in 1953 during UN Day celebrations. Watch that performance here.

    Again in 1976, the US ambassador took the stage in the iconic General Assembly Hall at the UN’s 31st birthday celebration, appearing alongside the National Symphony Orchestra of Washington DC, under the direction of Antal Dorati.

    Ms. Anderson was one of two soloists. She was the narrator in Aaron Copland’s composition Lincoln Portrait, and Lazar Berman, the Soviet pianist, performed Tchaikovsky’s First Piano Concerto.

    UN Photo

    US Ambassador Marian Anderson addresses the Fourth Committee during a discussion in on the Cameroons in 1958. (file)

    Stories from the UN Archive

    UN News is showcasing epic moments across UN history, cultivated from the UN Audiovisual Library’s 49,400 hours of video and 18,000 hours of audio recordings.

    Catch up on UN Video’s Stories from the UN Archive playlist here and our accompanying series here.

    MIL OSI United Nations News –

    February 12, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Tuberville Praises President Trump for Making Tariffs Great Again

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Alabama Tommy Tuberville
    WASHINGTON – Today, U.S. Senator Tommy Tuberville (R-AL) delivered a floor speech praising President Donald Trump’s recent implementation of reciprocal tariffs to ensure fairness and bolster our national security.
    Read the speech below or watch the full speech here.

    “I come to the floor today to talk to you about President Trump’s tariffs. The media is in full meltdown. They’re in a full meltdown mode after President Trump imposed duties and retaliatory tariffs this week on countries that have basically been ripping the United States of America off, and they’ve been doing it for decades. Apparently, globalists and Democrats are just fine with other countries imposing tariffs on the United States. But when it comes to President Trump trying to equalize it up, establish a level playing field for domestic producers, well, that’s a bridge too far.
    If they have been paying attention to President Trump, they should [not be] remotely surprised. He campaigned on this platform three times and has been crystal clear on his intentions. Now, he is following through on his campaign promises. But in the corporate media, it seems to still be confused about all these tariffs. So, let me spell it out.
    President Trump’s view on tariffs [are both] a negotiating tool to get other countries to do a few things that we ask them to do, a way to boost American manufacturing, and put American workers and businesses first, not last. President Trump has his work cut out for him after the disastrous four years for our small businesses and our corporations under the Biden administration. The Biden administration made it clear to our friends and foes alike that the globalist agenda would take precedent over the safety and well-being [of] the American people. It’s mind boggling. Thankfully, those days are over.
    [The] American people gave President Donald J. Trump a clear mandate to restore our country’s superpower status and [to] put all Americans first, all businesses first. Everybody that does something in this country. And that starts, number one, with securing our borders. Like I’ve said many times, if you don’t have a border, you don’t have a country. And we have really struggled in the last four years. That is changing.
    That’s why the Master Negotiator in Chief, President Donald Trump, threatened to impose 25% tariffs on Mexico and Canada [in] just the last couple of weeks. Over the last four years, the Mexican government just basically turned a blind eye while caravans of illegal aliens overrun our borders—coming from Mexico, coming from Central America, all over the world—just overrunning our country. Thousands of women and children were trafficked, raped along the way. Drug cartels made an absolute fortune—absolute fortune. Not just with drugs, by the way, but for the payments of these illegals coming all the way through either Central America or South America to United States with a big, basically, tariff of their own, charging these people to come to the United States. Lawlessness had become the status quo under President Biden. Nobody cared. Democrats in this room, they didn’t care. They didn’t care what was going on. Let’s just let them all come in. Let’s let the drugs come in. We lose 300 people pretty much every few days to illegal drugs in this country with overdoses. But let’s [not] worry about that. Let’s just worry about controlling our country the way they wanted to. Well, it’s been a disaster.
    Mexico showed zero signs of willingness to negotiate when President Trump took office. When he did take office [on] January 20th, they woke up real quick. President Trump correctly understands that Mexico’s economy is heavily dependent on the United States of America and the citizens of this country. In fact, more than 80% of Mexico’s exports come to the United States. 80% come here. And the American citizens buy those products […] Mexico’s economy would almost instantly feel the effects of a 25% tariff, leaving Mexico’s President Claudia Sheinbaum no choice—no choice—but to come to the negotiating table under the master negotiator Donald Trump.
    So that’s why he uses tariffs: to get his point across because people across the world take us for granted. As a result, within hours of President Trump’s announcement of the tariffs, Mexico caved. They saw real quick. Obviously, they’re not stupid. They agreed to help the United States secure the border and crack down on the cartels and the illegal drugs coming in—almost immediately. […] Our neighbor to the North also caved to President Trump after a 25% tariff was threatened on Canada. Not only are illicit drugs like fentanyl coming into our country from Mexico, but there are also about [a] 2000% increase in drugs coming across the border in 2023 and 2024 from Canada. A 2000% increase. In the last fiscal year alone, enough fentanyl was seized at the northern border to kill 9.8 million Americans. And to me, that would be a very serious problem. But do you think that Democrats cared? Nope. There was no action at all by the Biden administration on Canada. No action on Mexico. But thanks [to] President Trump’s leadership, our North American neighbors, from the North and South, are making changes now daily that will protect American citizens from deadly drugs, criminals, and human traffickers. The number one job of the President of the United States to protect the people in this country first, and that’s what President Trump’s doing.
    In addition to using tariffs as a negotiating tool, President Trump also views tariffs as a way to write the wrongs of past, ineffective trade deals. That’s why this week he’s imposing a 25% tariff on all steel and aluminum imports, including those of Canada and Mexico. Contrary to what the media is telling you, this isn’t unprecedented. It’s not unusual. In fact, President Trump has helped shine a light on the fact that US exporters face higher tariffs [….] more than two-thirds of the time. We pay more tariffs than anybody. For example, among our major trading partners, [China applies higher tariffs on 85% of U.S. products and India on 90% of U.S. products]. Just think about that. We are paying tariffs on things coming in[to] this country, but when we send things out, we get the heck tariffed out of us from other countries. It’s not fair trade.
    These exports, imbalances, don’t just impact bottom lines, they also discourage domestic production. We have got to produce more in this country. We have got to build more things in this country, and that’s what President Trump’s trying to do. If we don’t cut back on spending and start producing more in this country, this will not be the United States of America much longer because we will be bankrupt. And we’ll be reporting to somebody like China who is buying our treasury bills right and left…or they were. 
    One report conducted by the Department of Commerce in the first Trump administration found that excess production capacity, particularly China, has been a major factor in the decline of domestic aluminum production. Basically, we’re getting overwhelmed by aluminum from China that’s not near as good as what we make in this country.
    President Trump built one of the strongest economies in modern history in his first term. Modern history. But the democrats failed to know that. So, they wanted to change it. And did they ever. [They] almost destroyed our economy. Jobs and wages were up when President Trump was in, inflation was down. Americans had more money in their pocket. And thanks to President Trump’s strategic tariffs, along with the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, companies were reshoring businesses back in the United States right and left. They were coming back because they could make profit. And that’s what it’s all about when you have a corporation. You gotta make a profit. And President Trump was able to, because of tariffs, make more money for manufacturing. […]
    You had companies like Ford canceling plans to build in Mexico, back in President Trump’s first term, and instead opening one in Michigan. This turned out to be extremely important when COVID hit and we were forced to rely on goods manufactured right here in the United States. We found out pretty quick, just in [pharmaceutical] drugs alone, we make very little drugs in the United States. They’re made in India and China. They’ve got to come back here. We have to be self-sustaining.
    Whether it’s our healthcare technologies, agriculture products, or steel, and aluminum, there’s no reason for us to depend on other countries. We are the number one country in this world, have been, and will be in the future in manufacturing production. America has some of the best and brightest manufacturers. Best and brightest producers, farmers, and businesses. We take second to none. And from a national security perspective, it is dangerous to be reliant on other countries who may not have the best interests of the United States in mind. You can’t blame them. They’re looking out for themselves first. Well, we need to do the same thing.
    Not to mention the fact that US produces the cleanest steel in the world. You’d think the Democrats and the Climate Cult would at least be happy about that. Think about that. You know, President Trump just put tariffs on steel and aluminum. A lot of the steel and aluminum come in and, because of how they make it, is some of the dirtiest in the world. We make the cleanest, and why in the world would we want to import something that is going to be detrimental to our country? […]
    The tariffs being imposed this week are an important step in President Trump’s plan to restore fairness to trade, boost domestic manufacturing, and put consumers and producers first. It’s about time. Three weeks into his presidency, President Trump is keeping his promises. President Trump’s strategic tariffs will strengthen and revitalize our nation’s economy, stop the flow of illicit drugs and illegal immigration, and make sure our trade deals are fair to both taxpayers and American manufacturers. America first! President Trump is utilizing every tool at his disposal as we speak, including tariffs, to usher in the Golden Age of the American Economy. We have to make that change. If we don’t, we will not survive as the number one country in the world. We will not regain that status and we will be losing our national security.”
    Senator Tommy Tuberville represents Alabama in the United States Senate and is a member of the Senate Armed Services, Agriculture, Veterans’ Affairs, HELP, and Aging Committees.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    February 12, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: New report highlights agriculture’s $41.3 billion impact on North Dakota’s economy

    Source: US State of North Dakota

    Gov. Kelly Armstrong and Agriculture Commissioner Doug Goehring in collaboration with North Dakota State University (NDSU) along with the North Dakota Department of Commerce, released a comprehensive economic report today underscoring agriculture’s critical role in the state’s economy and rural prosperity.

    The study, conducted by NDSU’s Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics and the Center for Social Research, finds that North Dakota’s agriculture industry generates $41.3 billion annually in gross business volume, supports 123,360 jobs and contributes $10 billion in labor income. 

    “Agriculture isn’t just an industry. It’s the backbone of our economy and a cornerstone of rural prosperity,” said Dr. Greg Lardy, NDSU vice president for agricultural affairs. “This report reinforces the need for policies that drive investment and innovation in the sector.”

    The report, unveiled during a press conference today at the state Capitol, also highlights the continued growth of commodity processing and value-added agriculture, which are driving new economic opportunities across the state.

    “Continuing to add value to our commodities benefits every farmer and rancher across North Dakota and makes our state’s economy more resilient,” Armstrong said, citing examples such as the recently added soybean processing plants in Spiritwood and Casselton and a proposed potato processing plant in Grand Forks. “We’re committed to expanding processing and diversifying our agriculture sector to create jobs and ensure that North Dakota remains a leader in ag innovation as we feed and fuel the world.” 

    The North Dakota Agriculture Industry Economic Contribution Analysis was funded by industry, including the following: North Dakota Agricultural Association; North Dakota Corn Growers Association; North Dakota Dry Bean Council; North Dakota Farm Bureau; North Dakota Farmers Union; North Dakota Soybean Council; North Dakota Soybean Growers Association; North Dakota Stockmen’s Association; Northern Canola Growers Association; Northern Pulse Growers Association; Northland Potato Growers Association; and Red River Valley Sugarbeet Growers Association.

    “Agriculture continues to play an integral part in our state’s economy, thanks to our hardworking and innovative farmers, ranchers, rural communities and ag industries,” Goehring said. “We look forward to the future of agriculture as opportunities to add value, new cutting-edge developments and continued research shape how we produce a wide array of products used here and around the world.”

    Commerce Commissioner Chris Schilken tied the report’s findings to the need for strategic rural planning.

    “Planning is essential to ensure agriculture’s long-term success,” Schilken said. “From infrastructure to workforce development, rural communities need forward-thinking strategies to keep pace with industry growth. That’s why events like the North Dakota Rural Planning Symposium are so critical. They bring together experts and community leaders to map out a sustainable future for North Dakota’s rural economy.”

    The North Dakota Rural Planning Symposium kicks off this evening followed by a full day Wednesday of presentations focusing on strategies for building resilient rural communities, enhancing infrastructure and fostering economic development. The event will bring together community developers, policymakers and industry leaders to explore actionable solutions for strengthening North Dakota’s rural landscape.

    Learn more about the North Dakota Rural Planning Symposium at https://ndgov.link/RuralPlanning.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    February 12, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Expanding Healthcare, Transforming Lives

    Source: US State of Connecticut

    The end of January brought a landmark achievement for UConn’s School of Pharmacy, one that expands healthcare access and upholds the School’s commitment to patient care and community outreach. This success came after collective planning and action between the State of Connecticut and UConn’s School of Pharmacy – a big feat for a big cause.  

    Dean Hritcko addresses the audience

    Recognizing the shortage of primary care providers throughout the state, particularly among underserved populations, UConn Pharmacy developed a plan to create a pharmacy training program that would enable pharmacists to provide more comprehensive reproductive care by prescribing contraception to their patients.  

    “Allowing pharmacists to both prescribe and dispense hormonal birth control could help mitigate barriers and expand access to contraception for the citizens of our state.” – Dean Hritcko 

    Working with the Connecticut Pharmacists Association (CPA), the Department of Consumer Protection (Drug Control), and pharmacy employer entities across the state, faculty members worked to bridge the gap between this idea and the actions needed. Committed to making reproductive healthcare available to all, the UConn School of Pharmacy’s Office of Continuing Education and Professional Development developed the training and certification program, which equips pharmacists with the tools, resources, and knowledge, to provide their patients with these new services effectively and safely.  

    Acknowledging that excellence in pharmacy should be a nationwide standard, especially as many individuals across the country face barriers to affordable and accessible healthcare, this program is available to all pharmacists in every state.  

    Governor Lamont, understanding the transformative nature of this program and the current threats to reproductive healthcare, jumped on board. Working with the Connecticut Consumer Protection Commissioner Bryan T. Cafferelli, the training program received final approval at the end of January. 

    This training program is expected to take four hours to complete and is optional for pharmacists. Available through the UConn School of Pharmacy website, this training counts toward the fifteen hours of annual continuing education required for pharmacists.  

    Second-year Pharm.D. student Rachel Antonelli gives her speech

    To celebrate this pivotal moment, Governor Lamont requested to hold a press conference at the School on January 31st to address faculty, staff, students, and the press. In fact, Governor Lamont’s visit marks the first time a Connecticut governor has visited UConn’s School of Pharmacy! After he spoke, other influential leaders followed, including Dean Hritcko who expressed his gratitude to the government officials who collaborated with the School: “We’re grateful to Governor Lamont and Lieutenant Governor Bysiewicz for their leadership and unwavering commitment to ensuring Connecticut continues to lead the charge in healthcare innovation, protection of women’s health, and accessibility.”  

    Rachel Antonelli, a second-year Pharm.D. student  who is passionate about building meaningful patient connections, shared her gratitude for this stride in healthcare, “The passage of this legislation empowers more individuals to take an active role in their care, reducing accessibility barrier that too often stands in the way of essential healthcare services like providing contraception.” 

    In addition to pharmacists being able to prescribe contraception, this new legislation also includes the state’s first vending machines providing access to emergency contraception. The first of these vending machines can be found on the UConn, Storrs campus and is made possible by Dr. Peter Davis Smith, medical director of Student Health and Wellness (SHAW), and his colleagues and student advocates. 

    “This is just one of the many ways we’re working to expand access to contraception and other important medications in Connecticut.” – Governor Lamont   

    Governor Lamont talks with Sean Jeffery, Clinical Professor of Pharmacy Practice, and Nathan Rickles, Associate Dean for Admissions and Student Affairs

    This milestone in healthcare access comes in the UConn School of Pharmacy’s 100th year of excellence, exemplifying the continued efforts in education, research, and service to produce lasting change. With this latest effort, the impacts will transform communities in Connecticut and beyond, increasing healthcare access, reducing unintended pregnancies, and decreasing spending on our healthcare systems. Training the next generation of pharmacists, the School aims to inspire its students to continue to shape the future of healthcare and make a difference in the lives of Connecticut residents.   

    In times of need, UConn Pharmacy delivers – a testament to the School’s mission of building a better tomorrow through monumental actions that start today.  

    MIL OSI USA News –

    February 12, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Australia: Government moves to legislate better protections for telco consumers

    Source: Australian Ministers 1

    The Albanese Government is delivering on its commitment to strengthen protections for telco consumers with new laws introduced to Parliament today.
     
    The Telecommunications Amendment (Enhancing Consumer Safeguards) Bill 2025 will give effect to a number of significant reforms to boost the enforcement powers and penalties available to the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA).
     
    The proposed changes will enable the ACMA to take direct and immediate enforcement action against telecommunications providers that have breached their obligations to customers under industry codes.
     
    This will remove the current two-step process whereby the ACMA must first issue a direction to comply to offending telcos – no matter how significant the breach – and only take further action if non-compliance continues.
     
    It allows instead for the ACMA to take quick and appropriate action in response to breaches to immediately address consumer harm and hold telcos to account.
     
    The Bill will also significantly increase the maximum general penalty for breaches of industry codes and standards under the Telecommunications Act 1997 from $250,000 to approximately $10 million. Further changes will allow penalties for codes, standards and determinations to be based on the value of the benefit obtained from the offending conduct or the turnover of the relevant provider – allowing for penalties greater than $10 million in certain circumstances.
     
    This penalty framework will incentivise industry compliance and better aligns with those in other relevant sectors like energy and banking, and under the Australian Consumer Law.
     
    To ensure the ACMA has a range of effective enforcement tools at its disposal, an additional change will expand and clarify the Government’s ability to increase infringement notice penalty amounts the ACMA can issue for all applicable breaches, including consumer protection rules.
     
    The Bill will also increase visibility of providers operating in the market, especially telecommunications retailers, through the establishment of a Carrier Service Provider (CSP) registration scheme.
     
    This will allow for more effective regulation of CSPs, including by empowering the ACMA to stop a CSP operating where they’ve been found to pose unacceptable risk to consumers, or have caused significant consumer harm.
      
    Quotes attributable to Minister for Communications, the Hon Michelle Rowland MP:
     
    “The significant reforms included in this Bill will better equip the ACMA with the tools and powers it needs to protect telco consumers and hold providers to account.
     
    “The changes provide a powerful deterrent. They incentivise telcos to educate themselves about their obligations to consumers, and to abide by those obligations – boosting compliance and improving the functioning and fairness of the telecommunications sector.
     
    “The introduction of this Bill is another way the Government is putting consumers at the centre of the telco industry, recognising the importance of quality telecommunications services for all Australians.”

    MIL OSI News –

    February 12, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Security: Convicted Felon and Related Companies Agree to Pay More than $1 Million to Resolve Allegations that They Falsely Certified Eligibility for PPP Loans

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    BOSTON – Ralph Caruso of Wenham and five companies that he part-owns, have agreed to pay $1.065 million to resolve False Claims Act allegations that the companies falsely certified to the United States Small Business Administration (SBA) their eligibility for Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans. As part of the settlement, Caruso and his companies admitted that the loan applications falsely stated that the companies did not have owners who had pleaded guilty to certain felonies, but in fact Mr. Caruso had pleaded guilty to tax and mail fraud charges.

    The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act) is a federal law enacted on March 29, 2020, designed to provide emergency financial assistance to the millions of Americans who were suffering the economic effects caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The CARES Act authorized forgivable loans to small businesses for job retention and certain approved expenses, through the PPP. On Jan. 8, 2021, SBA announced the availability of a second round of PPP loans, known as Second Draw PPP loans. Entities that applied for Second Draw PPP loans had to certify, among other things, that no owner of the applicant had pleaded guilty to any felony involving fraud.  

    As detailed in the settlement agreement, on Jan. 21, 2021, Caruso pleaded guilty in federal court in Massachusetts to seven counts of aiding and assisting the filing of false tax returns, and five counts of mail fraud. Between Feb. 26, 2021, and April 1, 2021, five companies in which Caruso had at least a 20% ownership stake applied for Second Draw PPP loans. Caruso’s companies — Caruso Equipment Corp., Flush LLC, Above the Line LLC, LL Burlington LLC, and City Rentals LLC — received a total of $655,635 in loans. These companies, through individuals other than Caruso, later applied for and received forgiveness from SBA of these loans, including interest.

    The United States contends that these companies were not eligible for Second Draw PPP loans due to Caruso’s felony convictions and ownership interests, and that Caruso and these companies thus submitted or caused to be submitted false claims for payment to SBA.  

    “Faced with potential economic catastrophe wrought by the pandemic, SBA made PPP loans available only to certain trusted recipients — not those with felony fraud convictions,” said United States Attorney Leah B. Foley. “The ink was barely dry on Caruso’s guilty plea when his companies unlawfully applied for these PPP. This office will continue to hold accountable those who took advantage of the PPP and other taxpayer-funded pandemic relief.”

    “The favorable settlement in this case is the product of enhanced efforts by federal agencies such as the Small Business Administration working with the U.S. Attorney’s Office and other Federal law enforcement agencies to recover the product of this fraud as well as penalties,” said SBA General Counsel Wendell Davis.

    On May 17, 2021, the Attorney General established the COVID-19 Fraud Enforcement Task Force to marshal the resources of the Department of Justice in partnership with agencies across government to enhance efforts to combat and prevent pandemic-related fraud. The Task Force bolsters efforts to investigate and prosecute the most culpable domestic and international criminal actors and assists agencies tasked with administering relief programs to prevent fraud by, among other methods, augmenting and incorporating existing coordination mechanisms, identifying resources and techniques to uncover fraudulent actors and their schemes, and sharing and harnessing information and insights gained from prior enforcement efforts. For more information on the Department’s response to the pandemic, please visit https://www.justice.gov/coronavirus.

    Anyone with information about allegations of attempted fraud involving COVID-19 can report it by calling the Department of Justice’s National Center for Disaster Fraud (NCDF) Hotline at 866-720-5721 or via the NCDF Web Complaint Form at: https://www.justice.gov/disaster-fraud/ncdf-disaster-complaint-form.

    U.S. Attorney Foley and SBA General Counsel Davis made the announcement today. This matter was handled by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Andrew A. Caffrey, III and Brian Sullivan of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Massachusetts.

    MIL Security OSI –

    February 12, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Rosen Leads Push Urging Trump Administration to Exempt Seasonal Firefighters from Federal Hiring Freeze

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Jacky Rosen (D-NV)
    WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senator Jacky Rosen (D-NV) led 14 of her Senate colleagues in a letter urging the Trump Administration to exempt seasonal firefighters from the federal hiring freeze. Reports emerged last week indicating that the federal funding freeze is preventing the hiring and onboarding of seasonal firefighters, a workforce that already struggles with recruitment and retention. This comes as the West continues to be ravaged by deadly wildfires.
    “We write today following reports that hiring and onboarding for federal seasonal firefighters has stopped due to the Trump Administration’s federal hiring freeze,” wrote the Senators. “We are extremely concerned to hear that this is happening across the U.S. Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management, and National Park Service ahead of what’s expected to be another devastating wildfire year.”
    “Although there is an urgent need to hire more federal firefighters, the Trump Administration’s hiring freeze does the opposite and is pausing hiring at a critical time for this already understaffed workforce,” they continued. “We urge you to put the safety of families and communities across the country first and allow the federal seasonal firefighter hiring process to continue without delay.”
    The full letter can be found HERE.
    Senator Rosen has been a leader in ensuring Nevadans have access to the federal resources needed to prepare for, stay safe during, and recover from wildfires. Last year, legislation she helped introduce to improve wildfire readiness and response passed favorably out of the Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee. In addition, Senator Rosen has previously joined her colleagues in asking the White House for federal funds to help Nevada fight wildfires and extreme drought.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    February 12, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Hickenlooper, Colleagues Demand Answers for American Consumers, Military Families After Trump Admin Illegally Shutters Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator John Hickenlooper – Colorado
    This weekend, the administration froze all Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s supervision and enforcement activity
    Illegally closing the agency will leave American consumers, military families vulnerable to being ripped off
    WASHINGTON – Today, U.S. Senator John Hickenlooper joined nine Senate colleagues to call on Russell Vought, Director of the Office of Management and Budget, to end his directive freezing all supervisory and enforcement action at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). Vought also currently serves as the CFPB’s acting director.
    The CFPB defends American consumers against predatory lending and unfair practices like junk fees. It has returned $20 billion to American consumers since its establishment in 2011.
    Congress tasked the agency with enforcing the Military Lending Act (MLA), which protects active-duty service members and their dependents from abusive lending. The Trump administration’s stop work order exposes military families to steep interest rates, junk fees, and other abuses.
    “This decision leaves all Americans susceptible to predatory lending and other abusive practices, but in particular, it eliminates protections that prevent servicemembers from being exploited,” the senators wrote. “This funding, supervision, enforcement, and communications freeze will hit military families especially hard.”
    To date, the CFPB has successfully resolved 39 cases – including six MLA violations – involving service members and veterans, returning $363 million to victims. Multiple MLA cases are still being considered in court and the freeze will undermine these cases and weaken service member protections overall.
    The senators continued, “We request that the CFPB continue to supervise and investigate violations of the consumer financial protection laws and take forceful enforcement actions against lenders that violate the law, especially when it comes to predatory lending that harms our military readiness.”
    Hickenlooper previously chaired the Senate Commerce Committee’s Subcommittee on Consumer Protection, Product Safety and Data Security in the 118th Congress.  Full text of the letter is available HERE.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    February 12, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Government welcomes multibillion-pound Heathrow investment expected to secure thousands of steel jobs

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    The Government has welcomed a multibillion-pound investment programme from Heathrow Airport which will help secure UK steel jobs.

    • Heathrow Airport announces new multibillion-pound investment programme to expand airport, including new terminal buildings, aircraft stands, passenger infrastructure and work towards its third runway.
    • Government welcomes major vote of confidence from Heathrow in its growth mission after backing a third runway, expected to secure thousands of steel jobs across the UK.
    • Heathrow signs the UK Steel Charter and commits to using UK-made steel for its construction projects wherever possible, giving a major boost to the sector.

    The Government has welcomed a new multibillion-pound investment programme from Heathrow Airport, which is expected to secure thousands of UK steel jobs across the country by driving a significant increase in demand for UK-made steel.

    In the latest in a series of UK investment wins, Heathrow will invest billions in a new expansion programme for new terminal buildings, aircraft stands, passenger infrastructure and its third runway plans, marking a major vote of confidence in the Government’s plan for growth after the Chancellor confirmed the government’s backing for Heathrow’s expansion last month.

    At an event hosted at British Steel’s Scunthorpe plant today (12 February) Heathrow will also sign the UK Steel Charter, which signals the airport’s commitment to use UK-made steel wherever possible as part of its investment programme.

    The commitment represents a major win for the steel industry and will help secure thousands of existing steel jobs both at Scunthorpe and across the country. It will bring a huge increase in demand for UK-made steel to supply Heathrow’s expansion project.

    By its completion in 2008, the construction of Heathrow Terminal 5 had required 80,000 tonnes of steel, and estimates suggest construction of a third runway could require 400,000 tonnes.

    Industry Minister Sarah Jones is expected to give a keynote speech at Heathrow’s launch event today to welcome the announcement as a major step forward in the Government’s growth mission, with new investment crucial to kickstarting the UK’s economic growth and putting more money in people’s pockets, delivering on the Plan for Change.

    Industry Minister Sarah Jones is expected to say:

    This investment is the latest in a long line of wins which our Plan for Change has helped deliver, and not only secures thousands of jobs but marks a major vote of confidence in our homegrown steel sector and this government’s Industrial Strategy.

    Driving demand for UK-made steel is a crucial part of our upcoming Steel Strategy, and by signing the Steel Charter Heathrow will give a huge boost to steelmaking communities across the UK and help us kickstart economic growth.

    Alex Veitch, Director of Policy at the British Chambers of Commerce said:

    Expanding capacity at Heathrow is a key part of accelerating economic growth – and today’s announcement is great news for British business.

    It is real show of support for domestic steel production and supply chains across the UK. As further infrastructure projects are given the green light, many more opportunities can be seized to boost British business and drive forward growth.

    Gareth Stace, Director-General, UK Steel said:

    The UK steel industry welcomes Heathrow’s multi-billion-pound investment programme, a major boost for British businesses and a clear signal that the UK is open for growth. This transformative investment will upgrade vital infrastructure, create jobs, and strengthen the UK’s position as a global hub for trade and travel.

    As part of this commitment, Heathrow has pledged to maximise the use of UK-made steel with the UK Steel Charter, ensuring that the benefits of this project are felt across the country. British steelmakers produce world-class, high-quality products that support major infrastructure, and Heathrow’s decision to prioritise domestic steel and British business reinforces the strength and resilience of the UK supply chain.

    This is a vote of confidence in British manufacturing, supporting skilled jobs, driving investment, and helping to build a stronger, more sustainable economy.

    Heathrow’s new investment follows the Chancellor announcement of the Government’s full backing of a third runway expansion in her recent Growth Speech where she pledged to go further and faster to kickstart the UK’s economic growth.

    The Government has been clear that a third runway could add billions to a better-connected UK economy, deliver cheaper air fares and fewer delays, and drive UK exports and investment to new heights.

    According to new research from the consultancy Frontier Economics, a third runway at Heathrow Airport could increase the UK’s potential GDP by almost 0.5% directly by 2050, with over 60% of that increase going to areas outside London and the South East.

    Using UK-made steel on construction at Heathrow will also give a significant boost to the UK’s steel industry for the long term, which already supports over 75,000 jobs and contributes almost £2 billion a year to the economy.

    Background:

    • Current signatories to the UK Steel Charter include National Highways, the Railway Industry Association, Renewable UK and Sizewell C. The full list is available here: https://www.makeuk.org/about/uk-steel/uk-steel-charter-homepage/our-signatories-page
    • For further details on Heathrow’s investment announcement, please contact Chris Anderson, Press Officer at chris.anderson@heathrow.com, 07788561635

    Share this page

    The following links open in a new tab

    • Share on Facebook (opens in new tab)
    • Share on Twitter (opens in new tab)

    Updates to this page

    Published 11 February 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom –

    February 12, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Return of the Global Gateway project – E-002522/2024(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The EU’s Global Gateway (GG)[1] aims to mobilise up to EUR 300 billion in public and private investments by 2027 through a mix of grants, loans and guarantees.

    Over 2021-2023, EUR 179 billion were mobilised — EUR 50 billion from the EU and EUR 129 billion from Member States[2], the European Investment Bank and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD).

    The GG strategy fosters sustainable investments to support the digital and green transitions, as well as sustainable development in the climate, energy, and transport sectors, and reinforces, health, and education systems.

    The GG Business Advisory Group was formed to assist the Commission to strengthen cooperation with the European private sector. EU delegations have also organised over 50 business forums, facilitating discussions between businesses and policymakers and enabling EU-national Business-to-Business interactions.

    The European Fund for Sustainable Development Plus and the GET.invest programmes mobilising renewable energy investments[3] provide support through European development financing partners. This is done through loans, equity, and grants (and also advisory services).

    The EU established 14 strategic partnerships for sustainable raw material value chains, supporting local processing, refining, skills development, and environmental standards, and endorsed several GG-related flagship projects in Africa, Central Asia and Latin America.

    Other key initiatives include the Hi-Bar guarantee with the EBRD, a blending facility with the Inter-American Development Bank, and the critical raw materials value chains facility, which enhances collaboration between the EU and partner countries on sustainable raw material development.

    • [1] Joint Communication to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, the Committee of the Regions and the European Investment Bank The Global Gateway, JOIN(2021) 30 final, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52021JC0030
    • [2] Joint Communication on building sustainable international partnerships as a Team Europe, JOIN(2024) 25 final , https://international-partnerships.ec.europa.eu/document/download/1e8e8afb-64eb-493c-9494-7e2e10796bf3_en?filename=joint-communication-building-sustainable-international-partnerships-as-team-europe_en.pdf
    • [3] https://international-partnerships.ec.europa.eu/policies/programming/projects/getinvest-mobilising-renewable-energy-investments_enpa.eu

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    February 12, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Hearings – Housing Rentals in the Internal Market and Protection of Consumers – 18-02-2025 – Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection

    Source: European Parliament

    housing.jpg © no copyright

    On 18 February, from 14:30 to 16:30, the Internal Market and Consumer Protection Committee (IMCO) will host a public hearing about housing rentals in the internal market and consumer protection, in Brussels (SPAAK ROOM 1A2). This event aims to bring together different perspectives and gather feedback on housing rental challenges, with a particular emphasis on consumer protection.

    The hearing will gather representatives from the European Commission, industry organisations, the mayors of European cities and leading experts, with the view to ensure a comprehensive and diverse discussion.

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    February 12, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Other events – Housing Rentals in the Internal Market and Protection of Consumers – 18-02-2025 – Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection

    Source: European Parliament

    housing.jpg © no copyright

    On 18 February, from 14:30 to 16:30, the Internal Market and Consumer Protection Committee (IMCO) will host a public hearing entitled ‘Housing Rentals in the Internal Market and Protection of Consumers’ in Brussels (SPAAK ROOM 1A2) This event aims to bring together different perspectives and gather feedback on housing rental challenges, with a particular emphasis on consumer protection.

    The hearing will gather representatives from the European Commission, industry organisations, the mayors of European cities and leading experts, with the view to ensure a comprehensive and diverse discussion.

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    February 12, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Debates – Monday, 10 February 2025 – Strasbourg – Revised edition

    Source: European Parliament

    Verbatim report of proceedings
     403k
    Monday, 10 February 2025 – Strasbourg

       

    IN THE CHAIR: ROBERTA METSOLA
    President

     
    1. Resumption of the session

     

      President. – I declare resumed the session of the European Parliament adjourned on 29 January 2025.

     

    2. Opening of the sitting

       

    (The sitting opened at 17:03)

     

    3. Statements by the President

     

      President. – First of all, regarding what happened on 29 January 2025, on behalf of this House, I want to extend my deepest apologies for the incident that took place on 29 January during the European Parliament’s solemn session on International Holocaust Remembrance Day.

    The interruptions during our guest’s speech, 92-year-old Corrie Hermann, and during the minute of silence for Holocaust victims were disgraceful. The gravity of such behaviour cannot be overstated. It is a dark and stark reminder of why remembrance is not just a symbolic act, but a fundamental duty that this Parliament – that we all – must uphold.

    The appropriate consequences shall be drawn after the relevant procedures are followed. I thank the services for their assistance in this regard, and I thank all of you for being present that day.

    Dear colleagues, this month marks three years since Russia launched its unprovoked, unjustified and illegal full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Three years on, Ukraine remains resilient and this Parliament stands with Ukraine. Tomorrow, we are honoured to welcome Chairman Ruslan Stefanchuk of the Verkhovna Rada to mark this sombre anniversary. I ask you all to be present.

    Also, dear colleagues, last Tuesday we were devastated to hear of the horrific mass shooting at Risbergska school in Örebro, the worst in Sweden’s history. This was a senseless act of violence that claimed innocent lives, shattering families and scarring communities. Europe mourns with those who have been lost and our thoughts are with their loved ones, with all those who have been injured and with the people of Sweden in this moment of profound sorrow.

    Hatred and violence have no place in Europe. The values that unites us – peace, democracy and the dignity of human life – will always prevail.

    I now invite you to join me in observing one minute of silence in memory of the victims.

    (The House rose and observed a minute’s silence)

     

    4. Approval of the minutes of the previous sittings

     

      President. – The minutes and the texts adopted of the sittings of 23 January and 29 January are available.

    Are there any comments? I see that is not the case.

    Then the minutes are approved.

     

    5. Penalties

     

      President. – First of all, pursuant to Rules 10 and 183 of the Rules of Procedure, and after taking into account the observations of the Member concerned, I have decided to impose a penalty on Grzegorz Braun.

    At the sitting of 27 November 2024, Mr Brown repeatedly used offensive and discriminatory language in the framework of the debate of the recent legislation targeting LGBTQI persons.

    This penalty consists of the forfeiture of his entitlement to the daily subsistence allowance for a period of two days, as well as a temporary suspension from participation in all the activities of Parliament for a period of two days on which Parliament meets, starting from today, 10 February 2025, without prejudice to his right to vote in plenary and subject to strict compliance with the Members’ standards of conduct.

    The Member concerned has been notified of these decisions and has not launched an internal appeal with the Bureau pursuant to Rule 184. The penalties are therefore final.

     

    6. Composition of committees and delegations

     

      President. – The ECR, Greens/EFA and ESN groups and non-attached Members have notified me of decisions relating to changes to appointments within committees and delegations.

    These decisions will be set out in the minutes of today’s sitting and take effect on the date of this announcement.

     

    7. Negotiations ahead of Parliament’s first reading (Rule 72)

     

      President. – The AFET and BUDG Committees have jointly decided to enter into interinstitutional negotiations, pursuant to Rule 72(1) of the Rules of Procedure.

    The report, which constitutes the mandate for the negotiations, is available on the plenary webpage and its title will be published in the minutes of the sitting.

    Pursuant to Rule 72(2), Members or political groups reaching at least the medium threshold may request in writing by tomorrow, Tuesday 11 February, at midnight that the decision be put to the vote.

    If no request for a vote in Parliament is made within the deadline, the committees may start the negotiations.

     

    8. Negotiations ahead of Council’s first reading (Rule 73)

     

      President. – The IMCO Committee has decided to enter into interinstitutional negotiations ahead of the Council’s first reading, pursuant to Rule 73 of the Rules of Procedure.

    The position adopted by Parliament at first reading which constitutes the mandate for those negotiations is available on the plenary webpage, and its title will be published in the minutes of the sitting.

     

    9. Signature of acts adopted in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure (Rule 81)

     

      President. – I would like to inform you that, together with the President of the Council, I shall, on Tuesday, sign one act adopted under the ordinary legislative procedure, in accordance with Rule 81 of Parliament’s Rules of Procedure.

    The title of the act will be published in the minutes of this sitting.

    ⁂

    I would also like to inform the House that I have received three requests for points of order.

    I will give the floor in the order that we have received them, first with Petras Auštrevičius. Please quote the rule under which you are making the point of order.

     
       

     

      Petras Auštrevičius (Renew). – Madam President, dear colleagues, taking the floor under Rule 164, and while appreciating our Wednesday debate on the need for targeted support to EU regions bordering Russia, Belarus and Ukraine, let me draw your attention to the great action which happened last weekend once the Lithuanian, Latvian and Estonian energy was finally synchronised with the European continental energy ring.

    And this is the way we have to go and streamline, cutting down our decades‑long dependencies with eastern countries and synchronising into the single market, whatever it takes, economic, energy or whatever. So, our talk on Wednesday will be about this, about achievements and what we can do together.

     
       



     

      Stefano Cavedagna (ECR). – Signora Presidente, onorevoli colleghi, ho un richiamo al regolamento ai sensi dell’articolo 202 del nostro regolamento del Parlamento europeo.

    Infatti oggi è il 10 febbraio e in Italia, dalla legge 92 del 2004, celebriamo il Giorno del ricordo, che tutela l’onore dei martiri delle foibe e degli esuli di Istria, Fiume e Dalmazia, condannati a morte ed esiliati per colpa delle brigate comuniste del dittatore Tito jugoslavo. Se vogliamo pacificare, dobbiamo ricordare tutte le vittime del comunismo e anche queste, che hanno toccato in particolare il mio paese, e ricordare i martiri delle foibe.

    Per la prima volta ci sarà una esposizione qui a Strasburgo.

     

    10. Order of business

     

      President. – We now come to the order of business. The final draft agenda, as adopted by the Conference of Presidents on 5 February pursuant to Rule 163, has been distributed.

    With the agreement of the political groups, I wish to put to the House the following proposals for changes to the final draft agenda.

    For today, Monday, Parliament statement on the situation in Sweden in the midst of the recent mass shooting in Örebro, with one round of political group speakers, is added as the first point.

    For tomorrow, a formal sitting with an address by Ruslan Stefanchuk, Speaker of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, is added at 12:00. As a result, the voting session will start at 12:30.

    For Thursday, the order of debates will change as follows. The debate on ‘EU-Mercosur trade agreement’ will be taken as the first point on the agenda, whereas the debate on ‘Threats to EU sovereignty through strategic dependencies and communication infrastructure’ will be the second point.

    If there are no objections, then these changes are approved.

    We will move now to a change requested by a political group. For Wednesday, the ESN Group has requested that a Commission statement on ‘Condemning all politically motivated violence, in particular the slingshot attack in Germany and other violent attacks in Europe’ be added as the third point in the afternoon. As a consequence, the sitting would be extended to 23:00.

    I give the floor to Christine Anderson to move the request on behalf of the ESN Group.

     
       

     

      Christine Anderson, im Namen der ESN-Fraktion. – (Beginn des Redebeitrags bei ausgeschaltetem Mikrofon) … die Tagesordnung gerne um einen Punkt erweitern, unter dem sich dieses Haus geeint gegen jedwede politische Gewalt aussprechen kann. Anlass ist ein Angriff auf einen unserer Wahlkämpfer am Samstag, der mittels einer Zwille mit einer Stahlkugel beschossen wurde. In Hannover haben 250 Angreifer einen Wahlstand umzingelt. Nur mühsam konnte die Polizei mit Schutzschilden die Menge noch in Schach halten. Später zog der Mob dann weiter und bedrohte einen Stand der CDU. Ein Mitglied der CDU berichtete, er habe Angst um seine Parteimitglieder gehabt.

    Liebe Kollegen, Gewalt im Wahlkampf dürfen wir nicht tolerieren. Lassen Sie uns also mit einer Debatte gemeinsam ein Zeichen gegen jede Form von Gewalt setzen! Das sind wir unserer Demokratie schuldig. Lassen Sie uns demonstrieren, dass dieses Haus vereint gegen jede Form politischer Gewalt steht, egal, von wem sie ausgeht, und egal, gegen wen sie sich richtet! Vielen herzlichen Dank!

     
       


       

    (The sitting was briefly suspended)

     
       

       

    PRÉSIDENCE: YOUNOUS OMARJEE
    Vice-Président

     

    11. Resumption of the sitting

       

    (La séance est reprise à 17h19)

     

    12. Situation in Sweden in the midst of the recent mass shooting in Örebro (debate)



     

      Heléne Fritzon, för S&D gruppen. – Herr talman! En vanlig tisdag på en vanlig skola i Sverige, ett utbildningscenter för vuxna. Så förvandlas denna vanliga dag till en av de mörkaste dagarna i Sveriges historia. En svensk ung man skjuter besinningslöst inne på en skola. Han dödar tio människor, flera av dem med utländsk bakgrund.

    I dag, efter detta massmord, är det många med annan bakgrund i Sverige som känner rädsla och otrygghet. Och det är ett misslyckande för vårt samhälle, i Sverige, i Europa och i världen, när våld och splittring släcker människors liv. Eller som vår drottning i Sverige, drottning Silvia, uttryckte det när hon var i Örebro. Vart tog det fina Sverige vägen?

    Ord spelar roll. Det måste vi veta, inte minst i den offentliga debatten. Vi har alla ett ansvar. Hat och hot hör inte hemma här. För en skola, en helt vanlig dag, det ska vara en plats som är trygg. En plats som möjliggör människors drömmar om framtiden.

    Våra tankar finns i dag med alla de drabbade. Hos mamman i Örebro som inte kom hem till sina barn. Våra tankar finns med alla dem som stängdes in på skolan i skräck och hörde och såg skjutningar och blod. Och hos alla dem som gjorde en fantastisk insats med att rädda människors liv. Nu är vi i en tid när vi behöver komma samman. Så stort tack till alla er som står tillsammans med oss i Sverige i vår sorg.

     
       

     

      Sebastiaan Stöteler, on behalf of the PfE Group. – Mr President, dear colleagues, the recent tragic mass shooting in Örebro, Sweden has left us all in mourning. Eleven lives taken in an act of senseless violence that left many others injured remind us of the fragility of peace in our societies.

    This incident is not just a Swedish issue: it’s a European one. It underscores the urgent need for comprehensive security measures, vigilant community involvement and a reassessment of our policies on public safety. We must stand with Sweden, offering our solidarity and support, but also demand accountability and action.

    Tomorrow, we call upon European leaders to prioritise the safety of our citizens. We need policies that protect our schools, our public spaces and our communities from such tragedies. We need a Europe where our children can learn in safety, where our citizens can live without fear. But today, Mr President, our thoughts are with the victims, their families and the entire Swedish community. Today, we mourn with Sweden.

     
       


     

      Abir Al-Sahlani, för Renew gruppen. – Herr talman! Mitt Sverige är i sorg och i chock. Förra veckan hände den värsta masskjutningen i svensk historia. Tio människor fick sätta livet till. En lärare, vars dröm var att hjälpa andra uppnå sina drömmar. En mamma, som aldrig kom hem till sina fyra barn, och en personlig assistent, som var älskad och som skulle gifta sig nu till sommaren.

    Den gemensamma nämnaren mellan dessa är att de hade sina rötter någon annanstans än i Sverige. Varje människa hade drömmar, en historia de kom ifrån och en framtid som togs ifrån dem.

    Jag besökte Örebro i fredags för att hedra offren, för att lägga ljus och blommor utanför skolan och för att visa att även Europa står tillsammans med örebroarna och hela Sverige i vår sorg. Jag möttes av en bottenlös sorg, av ilska, av många frågor, men framför allt också av oro. Många föräldrar undrar hur de kan släppa iväg sina barn till skolan. De undrar själva om de kan få vara utanför. Många känner sig inklämda mellan rasismen och våldsbrotten.

    Många är frågorna och därför är det otroligt viktigt att polisen får gå till botten med vad som låg bakom. För vi behöver få riktiga svar.

    Jag möttes också av ett enat civilsamhälle i Örebro. Moskéerna och kyrkorna hade öppnat sina portar och var en varm famn för de som sökte stöd. Rädda barnen, Röda korset, socialtjänsten och ungdomsgårdarna var alla öppna där och fanns som stöd och hjälp för alla de som sökte. Jag vill rikta ett innerligt och varmt tack till polis, räddningstjänst och vårdpersonal som var där på plats och som fortfarande är där och hanterar situationen.

    Jag är ganska omskakad själv, för det här kunde ha varit mina föräldrar som hade varit där på plats. Det är exakt de här människorna det här våldet berör. Vi har en utmanande och svår tid framför oss i Sverige, men vi kan använda den för att tillsammans bygga Sverige. Ett Sverige för alla.

     
       



     

      René Aust, im Namen der ESN-Fraktion. – Herr Präsident! Meine sehr geehrten Damen und Herren! Ich möchte in dieser schwierigen Stunde den Angehörigen mein Beileid ausdrücken und garantieren und versichern, dass wir in dieser schwierigen Stunde an der Seite des schwedischen Volkes stehen und ihm unsere Solidarität aussprechen möchten. Wir möchten dankbar sein für diejenigen, die in den ersten Minuten mutig waren, als Polizisten in diese Schule gegangen sind und versucht haben, Schlimmeres zu verhindern. Und natürlich den Rettungskräften, die unmittelbar den Verletzten geholfen haben, damit es nicht noch mehr Opfer gab.

    Ich kann nur hoffen, dass alle Hintergründe dieser Tat aufgeklärt werden und dass mögliche Mitwisser auch dafür bestraft werden, falls es welche geben sollte. Ich möchte Schweden eines wünschen: Sie waren lange Jahrzehnte dafür bekannt, dass Sie eines der sichersten Länder dieser Erde sind, und ich hoffe, dass Schweden auf diesen Weg wieder zurückfindet. In diesem Sinne: Alles Gute den Hinterbliebenen, und dem schwedischen Volk unsere Solidarität!

     
       

     

      Le Président. – Je remercie l’ensemble des collègues pour la très grande dignité de cette discussion et la charge émotionnelle très forte qui dit combien nous sommes solidaires avec tout le peuple suédois.

     

    13. European Central Bank – annual report 2024 (debate)


     

      Anouk Van Brug, rapporteur. – Voorzitter, mevrouw Lagarde, Europa was ooit een continent van stabiliteit, waar hard werken werd beloond, waar je spaargeld groeide en waar je plannen kon maken voor de toekomst. Je kon iedere maand een deel van je salaris opzijzetten voor een groter doel — een huis, een pensioen of een welverdiende vakantie. Dankzij een fatsoenlijke rente kwam dat doel stap voor stap dichterbij.

    Maar die zekerheid is verdwenen. Steeds meer mensen kunnen niet meer rondkomen. Niet omdat ze niet hard werken, maar omdat het leven onbetaalbaar wordt. Sparen voelt als luxe, terwijl het voorheen een vanzelfsprekendheid was. Geld dat opzij werd gezet, verdampt. Want terwijl lonen achterblijven, stijgen de prijzen van boodschappen, energie en woningen tot onhoudbare hoogten.

    De Europese Centrale Bank had als belangrijkste taak de prijsstabiliteit te bewaken. Maar toch werden we de afgelopen jaren verrast door torenhoge inflaties. Hoe kon dit gebeuren? Wat ging er mis? Ja, de Russische invasie in Oekraïne heeft een grote rol gespeeld. Opeens werden energieprijzen onvoorspelbaar, raakten toeleveringsketens verstoord en schoten voedselprijzen omhoog. Maar deze crisis was niet de eerste schok voor onze economie. En zij zal ook niet de laatste zijn.

    Ik zeg niet dat de ECB stil heeft gezeten, maar de vraag is: waren we wel voorbereid? Terwijl de ECB druk bezig was met het onderzoek naar klimaat en duurzaamheid — belangrijke thema’s, zonder twijfel — werden andere risico’s onderschat, vooral geopolitiek. Oorlog en conflict.

    Mevrouw Lagarde, waarom had de ECB geen scenario’s klaarliggen voor een geopolitieke schok als deze? Waarom stonden we niet paraat om de gevolgen voor de inflatie en de economie te verzachten? Dit is namelijk geen hypothetische discussie. Vandaag is het de oorlog in Oekraïne die de economie onder druk zet. Maar wat is het morgen? Morgen kan het zomaar iets anders zijn. Want wat als de spanningen rond Taiwan escaleren en de wereldwijde chipleveranties opdrogen? Of wat als de Verenigde Staten binnenkort nieuwe handelsbeperkingen opleggen aan Europese bedrijven? Wat als de energieprijzen opnieuw omhoogschieten door geopolitieke instabiliteit in het Midden‑Oosten?

    De ECB moet niet alleen reageren op crises, maar moet ze voor zijn. We kunnen het ons niet veroorloven om keer op keer verrast te worden, terwijl de inflatie opnieuw door het dak schiet en miljoenen Europeanen daar de prijs voor betalen. Want laten we niet vergeten wie de uiteindelijke rekening betaalt. Dat zijn de gewone mensen thuis: de hardwerkende Nederlander, de jonge Europeanen die hun eerste huis proberen te kopen of de gepensioneerden die hun spaargeld langzaam zien verdampen. Zij verwachten leiderschap. Zij verwachten dat wij, als beleidsmakers, en u, vanuit de ECB, vooruitdenken en niet achter de feiten aan lopen.

    Dus ik vraag u, mevrouw Lagarde, om geopolitieke risico’s net zo serieus te nemen als klimaatverandering, om scenario’s te ontwikkelen, om voorbereid te zijn op de volgende economische schok, zodat we niet opnieuw verrast worden, zodat we niet opnieuw onze koopkracht laten wegslippen. Want uiteindelijk gaat dit niet over cijfers, rentepercentages of inflaties. Dit gaat over mensen, dit gaat over hun dromen en dit gaat over hun toekomst.

    Europa moet weer een continent worden waar mensen vol vertrouwen vooruit kunnen kijken, waar hard werken weer loont, waar sparen opnieuw mogelijk is en waar je plannen kunt maken en die ook echt kunt waarmaken. Dat is de opdracht. Dat is de verantwoordelijkheid, en de tijd om die verantwoordelijkheid te nemen, die is nu.

     
       

     

      Christine Lagarde, President of the European Central Bank. – Honourable Vice-President of the European Parliament, Commissioner Albuquerque, honourable Members of the European Parliament, Madam rapporteur, all of you, good afternoon, it’s an absolute pleasure to be back here, in the European Parliament, to discuss your draft resolution on the ECB’s annual report.

    At the ECB, we are deeply committed to dialogue, transparency and accountability. In particular, we are very keen on how we communicate with the people of Europe, who we consider very highly and we treat very seriously in their aspirations. Also, obviously, because you are representatives of the European people, we are very keen to make sure that we communicate with all of you as much as possible. In fact, in the last parliamentary term – for those of you who were Members of Parliament in the last parliamentary term – we interacted with this Parliament more frequently than in previous terms, the record shows.

    At the same time, it’s not just about us being accountable to you, it’s also the opportunity to hear your views and, through you, the views of European members and European people. Your debate and resolution are an important pillar of the ECB’s accountability framework and a key channel for you to share your views with us – and I can assure you that we listen and we pay great attention. For instance, next week will mark the 10th anniversary since the ECB started publishing the accounts of the Governing Council’s monetary policy meetings, and that was a major step in order to enhance our monetary policy communication and one that you, Parliament, had advocated for ten years ago. We have done that ever since, and we were followed through by other central banks around the world as a result.

    This year’s draft resolution covers key issues that are central to the ECB’s mandate and the future of the euro area, including our response to inflation, the digital euro and the ECB’s role in supporting the EU’s broader economic policies. It also reflects the dynamic challenges we face in Europe today, and I look forward to hearing you thoughts on all of these issues and having a constructive dialogue with you.

    But, before we do that, let me first outline our view on the current economic situation, explain what our monetary policy stance is and also address the broader economic challenges we are facing and what implications they have for our monetary policy.

    When I look at the euro area economy today, I can attest that it grew – but it grew modestly – in 2024. While output stagnated in the fourth quarter of 2024, it was still 0.9 % higher than in the last quarter of 2023. Surveys indicate that manufacturing continues to contract while services activity is expanding. Consumer confidence – you will hear more about that – is still fragile and, despite rising real incomes, households are hesitant to spend more.

    And yet, the conditions for a recovery remain in place. A solid job market and higher incomes should strengthen consumer confidence and allow spending to rise and consumer consumption to be a driver of growth. More affordable credit should boost consumption and investment over time. Exports should also allow and support the recovery as global demand rises, although in that respect it’s obviously conditional upon changes and developments that we will observe in international trade policies.

    Inflation stood at 2.5 % in January and has recently developed broadly in line with staff projections. Core inflation – that is, taking out energy and food – has remained at 2.7 % in recent months, reflecting a sideways movement in both services and goods inflation. Wage growth is moderating as expected, although it remains elevated, while at the same time profits are partially buffering the impact of wage increases on inflation.

    Inflation is set to return to our 2 % medium-term target in the course of 2025, this year, with risks on both the upside and the downside. It’s clear that greater friction in global trade would make the euro area inflation outlook more uncertain.

    In total, the ECB has lowered interest rates by 125 basis points since last June, and the deposit facility rate, which is the rate through which we steer the monetary policy stance, now stands at 2.75 %. At our last meeting in January, we decided to lower our key interest rates by another 25 basis points, based on an updated assessment of the inflation outlook, the underlying inflation and its dynamics, as well as the strength of monetary policy transmission. In particular, the disinflation process in the euro area is well on track. Most measures of underlying inflation suggest that inflation will settle at around our targets on a sustained basis. And while financing conditions continue to be tight, our recent interest rate cuts – 125 basis points – are gradually making borrowing less onerous for both corporates and households.

    We are determined to ensure that inflation stabilises at our 2 % medium-term target. We will follow a data-dependent and meeting-by-meeting approach to determining the appropriate monetary policy stance, and we are not pre-committing to any particular path.

    So let me now turn to the broader economic environment and its implications for monetary policy. Europe has faced – and you know that – a series of unprecedented challenges in recent years, each with its own far reaching impact, and probably more far reaching than we could all anticipate when they hit our radar screen. From the COVID-19 pandemic to surging energy prices and the geopolitical upheaval caused by Russia’s unjustifiable invasion of Ukraine, we have navigated our way through a storm of supply shocks, predominantly. Is that it? Probably not, because as we look ahead, notably because of geopolitical developments, the frequency of these shocks is likely to remain high.

    While we have weathered these crises, the past few years have also revealed missed opportunities and underinvestment in areas such as the digital transformation and the green transition, and the uncertainty surrounding trade and economic policy continues to weigh on consumption and on investment. As a result, and as was very well highlighted by the respective reports of Enrico Letta and Mario Draghi, Europe finds itself lagging behind international competitors in both productivity and growth.

    In a world driven by shifting global dynamics and rapid technological change, Europe must strike that delicate balance between achieving strategic autonomy and preserving its openness to the global economy. As President von der Leyen and I highlighted in a recent article, Europe’s response to these challenges must be bold and strategic. While the outlook may seem daunting, the prospects are more promising than they might appear.

    One of Europe’s first priorities should be to deepen the internal market. By removing the very barriers that we impose upon ourselves – barriers that actually operate almost like internal tariffs – we can unlock economies of scale, encourage innovation and reduced costs for consumers and producers alike. We are already home to a wealth of ideas and innovators. Our challenge is to transform these ideas into technologies that effectively fuel economic growth. To do so, we need to reduce unnecessary administrative burdens and foster an innovation-friendly environment.

    Another critical area is enhancing Europe’s autonomy in payments, which form the backbone of our economy and our single currency. At present, a few foreign – foreign – providers dominate Europe’s payments landscape. Yes, there are a few Member States that have their own respective payment system, but overall it is dominated by foreign players, leaving us vulnerable to external pressures. As we face an increasingly digital future, we must prepare the ground for a digital euro. This will ensure the resilience and public good nature of our payment systems. It will also provide a platform for private innovation in digital payments – private innovation that banks can take the initiative of.

    With substantial substantial savings at its disposal, Europe must channel more resources into private investment and scale up financing to support its innovators. A genuine capital market union designed for citizens and businesses alike will be instrumental in that respect. I have advocated that for years and so have you. But we need to make sure that it comes through as a reality, not as an aspiration.

    More broadly, investment must be the cornerstone of Europe’s economic transformation. The focus must be on investing in physical and digital infrastructure, research and development, and green technologies. These are not optional but essential investments required to drive productivity and guarantee Europe’s competitiveness on the global stage. In addition, they will address our energy dependence and help us meet our climate goal – both pressing imperatives.

    In this regard, we welcome the European Commission’s Competitiveness Compass as a concrete roadmap for action, which will also support the ECB in maintaining price stability by reducing Europe’s susceptibility to supply shocks.

    Having said that, the European Central Bank is not standing still. We are committed to learning from the experiences of recent years. As part of the ongoing assessment of our monetary policy strategy, we are preparing for the risk of an increasingly volatile future. We are taking stock of a changed inflation environment and economic context. We are also focusing on the implications for monetary policy, our experiences with our evolving policy toolkit, our reaction function and how to better deal with risk and uncertainty in policy setting and communication. While the ECB continuously evaluates and adapts its economic models – a topic raised in your resolution, I know that – assessing new analytical needs will be one component of this assessment.

    So, in conclusion, the challenges facing Europe are immense, but solutions are within our reach. Our opportunity lies in more and better Europe.

    As Konrad Adenauer said 70 years ago, ‘European unity was the dream of a few. It became the hope for many. Today it is a necessity for all of us’. This sentiment, and I quoted him, rings true today more than ever.

    To jointly tackle Europe’s challenges, I’m counting on Parliament’s commitment. Within its mandate, the ECB will play its part. Ever since the introduction of the euro, the ECB has continuously adapted to changing economic environments to fulfil its mandate. And we will remain fully committed to delivering on this very mandate. We are equally committed to maintaining our active and meaningful dialogue with all of you, as Members of the European Parliament, and I thank you for your attention.

     
       


     

      Maria Luís Albuquerque, Member of the Commission. – Mr President, President Lagarde, honourable Members, it is a pleasure to discuss the draft report on the ECB Annual Report prepared by the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs. I would like to thank the rapporteur Ms Anouk Van Brug and the members of the Committee.

    The assessment of the ECB’s activities by the European Parliament is an important part of the democratic accountability of the ECB. The Commission welcomes the ECB’s monetary policy measures, which have helped to keep inflation expectations anchored, and have contributed to the disinflationary processes over the last two years. The Commission acknowledges the ECB’s strong commitment and decisive action to ensuring price stability.

    Last year, the EU economy resumed moderate growth amidst a further abatement of inflationary pressures; unemployment remained very low, and employment reached record levels. Overall, the EU economy has shown remarkable resilience amidst the series of severe shocks. This is in no small measure thanks to our collective policy actions, including those of the ECB. Looking ahead, and in line with the ECB, the Commission expects inflation to return to around 2 % in the course of the year. GDP growth is set to pick up as private consumption gains strength and investment recovers from a weak performance in 2024.

    At the same time, the European economy suffers from a series of structural breaks on its competitiveness, holding back our growth and threatening our future prosperity. As the world has entered an era of harsh geostrategic competition, boosting our competitiveness and productivity has become even more urgent. This requires urgent action on several fronts.

    To steer the work, two weeks ago, the Commission proposed a competitiveness compass. It is centered on three transformational imperatives: closing the innovation gap, a joint roadmap for decarbonisation and competitiveness, and reducing excessive dependencies and increasing security. These enablers are complemented by action on horizontal enablers, such as completion of the single market, simplification, promotion of skills and quality jobs, better coordination of policies and financing. Over the next weeks and months, the Commission will roll out a series of policy initiatives to implement the strategy. The Commission looks forward to working closely with Parliament to deliver on them.

    A key foundation for a competitive economy is economic stability. Therefore, in line with the calls in your report to ensure sound fiscal policies, we have proceeded swiftly with the implementation of the new economic governance framework. We approved the medium‑term plans for 21 Member States. Those plans contain commitments for prudent fiscal policies, as well as reforms and investments in line with our EU priorities. Now, the time for delivery has come to bring deficits and debt down where they are too high.

    Overall, the implementation of the EU Member States’ plans will result into a slightly contractionary fiscal stance in 2025, which is appropriate following a long period of expansion.

    Honourable Members, our challenges are numerous. The actions we need to take are ambitious and urgent. Together with the support of this House and underpinned by the crucial policies of the ECB, we will be able to improve our competitiveness, secure our social market economy and build our future prosperity.

     
       

     

      Markus Ferber, im Namen der PPE-Fraktion. – Herr Präsident! Frau Kommissarin! Frau Präsidentin, liebe Christine Lagarde! In der Vergangenheit war der Jahresbericht zur Europäischen Zentralbank oft ein hartes Stück Arbeit. Und in schwierigen Verhandlungen ist manchmal auch die klare Linie abhandengekommen. Dieses Mal ist es anders. Und dafür möchte ich auch im Namen unseres Verhandlungsführers Marco Falcone, der Berichterstatterin und dem gesamten Verhandlungsteam ganz herzlich danken.

    Der Bericht gibt ein klares Bekenntnis zum Ziel der Preisstabilität, das immer der Fixstern des Handelns für die EZB sein sollte. Daraus folgen die Kernprinzipien wie das der monetären Dominanz und der Marktneutralität. Der Aspekt der Marktneutralität ist für uns als EVP-Fraktion von ganz besonderer Bedeutung. Denn für uns ist entscheidend, dass die Europäische Zentralbank in ihren geldpolitischen Entscheidungen den Wettbewerb und die Marktmechanismen nicht verzerrt. Das mag hier in diesem Haus nicht jedem gefallen, denn so mancher will die EZB gern für politische Ziele einspannen. Aber das ist nicht ihre Aufgabe. Im Sinne eines fairen Wettbewerbs und einer effizienten Kapitalallokation sollten wir deswegen der Versuchung widerstehen. Deswegen ist das Prinzip der Marktneutralität so entscheidend. Ich freue mich, dass wir dieses Mal endlich einen Text gefunden haben, der hoffentlich alle Seiten entsprechend berücksichtigt.

    Neben der Geldpolitik haben wir uns auch mit dem digitalen Euro beschäftigt. Hier liegen zwar Vorschläge auf dem Tisch, aber diese Vorschläge lassen noch viele Fragen offen. Und auf die müssen wir im Gesetzgebungsverfahren Antworten finden. Wir sollten auch in diesem Jahresbericht keine Vorfestlegungen treffen. Das gilt aber auch für die Europäische Zentralbank, die akzeptieren muss, dass momentan der Gesetzgeber der Herr des Verfahrens ist und nicht die Europäische Zentralbank. Es handelt sich nämlich nicht nur um eine reine geldpolitische Entscheidung, sondern um eine politische Entscheidung von großer Tragweite. Und das sollten wir in aller Ruhe hier in diesem Haus miteinander diskutieren. Ich bitte Sie wirklich, diesen Passus sehr intensiv zu lesen, auch Ihrem Stellvertreter mitzugeben, der sich hier besonders engagiert. Dann sind wir auf dem richtigen Weg.

     
       

     

      Evelyn Regner, im Namen der S&D-Fraktion. – Herr Präsident! Sehr geehrte Frau Präsidentin Lagarde! Sehr geehrte Frau Kommissarin Albuquerque! Die Europäische Zentralbank ist viel mehr als nur eine Bank: Sie ist das Rückgrat unserer Wirtschaftspolitik, Stütze der Europäischen Union. Ihre Geldpolitik bestimmt unsere wirtschaftliche Zukunft, und wer ihr die Hände bindet, blockiert den Fortschritt, gefährdet den sozialen Frieden und stellt sich gegen die gemeinsame Verantwortung.

    Preisstabilität ist der Kern, um nicht zu sagen die heilige Kuh der Geldpolitik. Doch Geldpolitik geht weit über die bloße Preisstabilität hinaus. Daher hat die Europäische Zentralbank auch zwei Mandate, und das zweite Mandat umfasst die Verantwortung für den Wohlstand der Menschen, für Arbeitsplätze, Innovation und auch für Chancengleichheit. In einer Zeit, in der der Klimawandel und soziale Ungleichheit immer mehr auf die Menschen niederprasseln, ist das zweite Mandat der Europäischen Zentralbank dadurch dringlicher denn je.

    Wir Sozialdemokratinnen und Sozialdemokraten stehen fest an der Seite der EZB, denn ihre Rolle ist unverzichtbar – auch im Kampf gegen den Klimawandel. Tatsächlich: Preisstabilität und Klimaschutz sind untrennbar miteinander verbunden. Denn die Klimakrise bedroht Menschen, bedroht unseren Planeten und die Wirtschaft gleichermaßen, und wer das nicht begreift, der lebt in einer Illusion. Leider gibt es noch immer Kräfte in diesem Haus, die die EZB auf eine marktneutrale Linie zwingen wollen, als ob dies ein unantastbares Dogma wäre. Aber wir wissen: Marktneutralität ist kein Naturgesetz, sondern maximal ein von Menschen erdachtes Konzept, das uns im Klimakampf im Stich lässt. Diese Politik der Marktneutralität würde die Probleme der Menschen und des Planeten verschärfen, statt Lösungen zu bringen.

    Die Erkenntnis also, dass Klimawandel, soziale Gerechtigkeit und Preisstabilität eng miteinander verknüpft sind, muss uns den Leitfaden geben, wie Geldpolitik zu gestalten ist. Denn nur eine nachhaltige und gerechte Wirtschaft kann langfristige Stabilität für uns alle gewährleisten.

     
       

     

      Sebastiaan Stöteler, namens de PfE-Fractie. – Voorzitter, mevrouw Lagarde, ik spreek vandaag ten behoeve van mijn delegatiegenoot Zijlstra, die schaduwrapporteur op dit dossier was en helaas vandaag wegens ziekte niet kan spreken.

    Toen de Europese Centrale Bank op 1 juni 1998 door Wim Duisenberg boven het doopvont van het Verdrag van Maastricht werd gehouden, dachten we allemaal dat we een centrale bank zouden hebben die tot doel had het prijspeil stabiel te houden. Zo staat het ook nog steeds in het mandaat.

    Bijna dertig jaar later blijkt daar echter weinig van over te zijn. Volgens cijfers van het CBS bedraagt de Nederlandse inflatie sinds 2020 ongeveer 20 %. Gevolg: bijna nergens in de EU is alles zo snel zo duur geworden als in Nederland. De mensen komen steeds moeilijker rond. Door de hoge inflatie van afgelopen jaren verdampte ongeveer 30 miljard EUR aan Nederlands spaargeld, maar konden failliete eurolanden wel hun staatsschuld weginflateren.

    Dit perverse systeem moet gestopt worden. De Nederlandse spaarder, gepensioneerde en ondernemer worden belazerd door een centrale bank die enkel oog heeft voor de belangen van ministers die hun overheden onverantwoord geleid hebben en begrotingen niet op orde krijgen. Het wordt tijd dat de Europese Centrale Bank de mensen die sparen, werken en ondernemen weer in het vizier heeft en niet langer straft, maar beloont. Dat zo’n koerswijziging wellicht het faillissement van een of meerdere eurolanden betekent, is een spijtige zaak, maar het mag geen argument zijn om de Nederlander verder financieel uit te roken.

     
       

     

      Denis Nesci, a nome del gruppo ECR. – Signor Presidente, onorevoli colleghi, signora Presidente Lagarde, oggi ci troviamo a discutere il rapporto annuale della BCE, un documento che fornisce una panoramica sulle politiche monetarie adottate, sull’attività di vigilanza e sulle altre funzioni svolte dal Sistema europeo di banche centrali.

    In qualità di relatore ombra del gruppo ECR, ho lavorato affinché il testo mantenesse un approccio pratico, bilanciando l’indipendenza della BCE con la necessità di garantire una politica monetaria efficace.

    Il rapporto affronta temi come la politica monetaria, l’euro digitale, gli obiettivi secondari della BCE e il rafforzamento del ruolo internazionale dell’euro e sottolinea l’importanza della stabilità dei prezzi nella lotta all’inflazione, fondamentale per un ambiente favorevole a investimenti, crescita e occupazione.

    Riguardo all’euro digitale, si chiarisce che dovrà affiancare il contante senza sostituirlo, garantendo la privacy ai cittadini. Si evidenzia inoltre la necessità di maggiore trasparenza nella gestione delle obbligazioni societarie e di un approccio equilibrato nella decarbonizzazione.

    Infine, chiediamo alla BCE di intensificare il dialogo con i parlamenti nazionali e di collaborare strettamente con gli Stati membri su un programma di educazione finanziaria, strumenti fondamentali per aumentare la consapevolezza e la preparazione di consumatori e imprese.

    È cruciale che la BCE adotti un approccio più pragmatico e improntato al buon senso, sempre con l’obiettivo di salvaguardare le famiglie, le imprese e i consumatori. Solo con politiche che riflettono una comprensione concreta delle sfide quotidiane, la BCE potrà rafforzare ulteriormente la fiducia nell’euro e migliorare l’efficacia delle sue azioni, promuovendo un equilibrio tra la stabilità economica e il benessere dei nostri cittadini.

     
       

     

      Gilles Boyer, au nom du groupe Renew. – Monsieur le Président, Madame la Commissaire, Madame la rapporteure, Madame la Présidente Lagarde – merci pour votre présence et pour vos propos –, nous pensons que la Banque centrale européenne doit pouvoir réagir avec la souplesse nécessaire, en respectant évidemment le mandat établi par les traités, pour assurer la stabilité monétaire au sein de notre Union.

    Le principe de neutralité de marché a donc toute sa place dans la politique monétaire de la Banque centrale européenne, mais nous devons l’appliquer avec intelligence et avec flexibilité, comme tout ce que nous faisons. Il faut permettre à la Banque centrale européenne de réagir aux changements économiques et sociétaux, a fortiori lorsqu’ils sont systémiques, comme c’est souvent le cas en ce moment.

    La réalité s’impose à nous. Je prends l’exemple des accords internationaux que nous avons pu conclure, tels que l’accord de Bâle sur la régulation du système bancaire. Lorsque nos partenaires dans les autres juridictions décident de ne pas appliquer les règles mondiales décidées en commun et créent une situation de concurrence déloyale, nous devons pouvoir réévaluer nos positions pour nous assurer que nos banques soient toujours en mesure de financer nos PME, les ménages européens et les transitions vertes et numériques qui sont si essentielles. Le tout, évidemment, dans le cadre d’un système financier sécurisé.

    Ce sera un des enjeux de ce mandat européen, ici. Notre Union européenne s’est beaucoup tournée vers elle-même, et à juste titre, par le passé. Elle doit à présent regarder davantage vers l’extérieur.

     
       

     

      Rasmus Andresen, im Namen der Verts/ALE-Fraktion. – Herr Präsident! Die geldpolitische Debatte in diesem Haus ist in Teilen unehrlich und auch durch Widersprüche geprägt. Finanzstabilität ist 2025 etwas anderes als in den 90er- oder in den 2000er-Jahren. Deshalb muss sich auch die Arbeit der Zentralbanken weiterentwickeln. Wer zum Beispiel möchte, dass die Inflation sinkt und dass die Preise bezahlbar werden, muss sich mit den Ursachen auseinandersetzen. Und die Ursachen für die hohe Inflation in den letzten Jahren – zumindest in der Europäischen Union, im Euro-Währungsgebiet – sind die hohen Energiepreise und zum Teil auch die Profitgier. Denn einige Konzerne haben die Energiepreisexplosionen ausgenutzt und – während wir über Sanktionen gegenüber Russland beraten haben – ganz gut Kasse gemacht.

    Wer möchte, dass unsere Währung und unsere Wirtschaft stabil bleiben, der kann die Augen nicht vor der Klimakrise verschließen. Und wer möchte, dass wir in moderne Infrastruktur investieren, kann nicht ignorieren, dass auch hohe Zinssätze darauf einen Effekt haben. Es ist sehr schade, dass der aktuelle EZB-Bericht, über den wir morgen abstimmen, alle diese Fragen nicht befriedigend beantwortet, sondern – im Gegenteil – vor einem Großteil der Probleme die Augen verschließt. Es ist gut, dass die EZB in diesen Fragen viel weiter ist als einige Abgeordnete hier im Haus, denn es ist dringend notwendig. Und es wäre auch notwendig, sich damit auseinanderzusetzen, welche Rolle eigentlich die USA auch für die Geldpolitik in den nächsten Jahren spielen werden. Trump macht Geldpolitik, die vor allem im Interesse von Krypto-Milliardären ist. Das sollten wir nicht auch tun.

    Deshalb ist es wichtig, dass wir eine eigene Geldpolitik formulieren und dass wir uns über diese Fragen auseinandersetzen. Dazu sind wir Grüne bereit. Und wir freuen uns, Frau Lagarde, dass wir das auch in den nächsten Jahren mit Ihnen und Ihrem Team weiter tun werden.

     
       

     

      Jussi Saramo, The Left-ryhmän puolesta. – Arvoisa puhemies, jokaisesta ostoksestani menee siivu amerikkalaiselle kartellille. Suurin osa korttiostoksista – kännykälläkin tehdyistä – tehdään Visan ja Mastercardin kautta. Oikeaa kilpailua ei ole, vaikka yksityinen monopoli tai kartelli on kaikkein huonoin tapa järjestää pakolliset asiat.

    Miksi eurooppalaiset yrittäjät joutuvat tilittämään osan myynnistään yhdysvaltalaiselle duopolille, joka sanelee hinnat? Samalla Trump uhkaa meitä tulleilla, veronkierrolla, jopa sotilaallisella hyökkäyksellä. Yhteiskunnan perusjärjestelmät eivät voi olla arvaamattoman valtion hybridisodan uhan alla. Nyt on laitettava tavallisten eurooppalaisten kuluttajien ja pienyrittäjien etu pankkien ja Yhdysvaltain suurvaltapolitiikan edelle.

    Digieuro, oikein tehtynä, lisäisi Euroopan itsenäisyyttä parantamalla maksujärjestelmämme kestävyyttä ja palauttamalla julkisen vaihtoehdon maksamiseen. Vastustan käteisestä luopumista, mutta jos ja kun kauppiaat, pankit ja markkinat ajavat käteisen alas, on meillä oltava tulevaisuudessakin julkinen rahan muoto. Kuluttajien lisäksi digieurosta hyötyisivät erityisesti kauppiaat, joiden neuvotteluasema suhteessa maksunvälittäjiin paranisi lisävaihtoehtojen myötä. Oikein tehtynä digieuro myös vapauttaisi tavalliset pienituloiset ihmiset pankkien pakkoasiakkuudesta. Tähän ei tunnu olevan vielä poliittista tahtoa, mutta tulevaisuudessa digieuro voisi olla paljon, paljon enemmän kuin mihin konservatiivit ovat olleet valmiina.

    Tämänvuotinen mietintö Euroopan keskuspankin toimista on valitettavasti puutteellinen muutenkin kuin digieuron osalta. Siinä ei oteta riittävässä määrin huomioon, että keskuspankin asettama korkotaso on edelleen liian korkea monelle euroalueen jäsenvaltiolle, kuten omalle kotimaalleni Suomelle. Mietintö on pettymys myös ilmastotoimien ja vihreän siirtymän suhteen. Se jopa vaatii EKP:ta jarruttelemaan ilmastonmuutoksen vastaisissa toimissa. Modernilla keskuspankilla on oltava muitakin tavoitteita kuin hintavakaus. Keskuspankit voivat – ja niiden täytyy – tukea työllisyyttä ja siirtymää kohti kestävää taloutta.

     
       

     

      René Aust, im Namen der ESN-Fraktion. – Herr Präsident! Meine sehr geehrten Damen und Herren, unsere Währung muss sicher sein! Denn nur eine stabile Währung sichert den Wohlstand unserer Bürger. Eine stabile Währung schützt Wohlstand und Kaufkraft. Sie sorgt dafür, dass Preise berechenbar bleiben, dass sich Arbeit lohnt und jeder auch morgen noch genauso viel oder mehr für sein Geld bekommt wie bisher.

    Die Europäische Zentralbank hätte den Auftrag, genau das zu gewährleisten. Doch seit Jahren verfolgt sie andere Ziele: Finanzierung von Staatsschulden; sie griff in die Wirtschafts- und Sozialpolitik von Nationalstaaten in den Zeiten der Troika ein; und jetzt macht sie sogar Klimapolitik. Die Folgen spüren wir alle: Ersparnisse schrumpfen, Investitionen gehen zurück.

    Landsleute und Bürger Europas! Wir brauchen keine Experimente der EZB mit unserem Geld. Wir brauchen Verlässlichkeit! Deshalb ist jetzt ein klarer Kurs nötig: Das Eurosystem muss reformiert werden; die Stimmgewichte im EZB-Rat müssen sich an der Kapitalbeteiligung orientieren, Deutschland hat heute eine Stimme wie auch Malta – das muss verändert werden; TARGET2-Salden müssen jährlich mit Werten wie Gold, Bitcoin oder handelbaren Wertpapieren ausgeglichen werden; keine Schuldenpolitik durch die Hintertür, die EZB darf weder direkt noch indirekt Schulden der Staaten finanzieren.

    Das Mandat der EZB muss wieder gelten, und zwar wortgetreu! Eine solide Geldpolitik schützt Einkommen und Vermögen, sie gibt den Menschen Sicherheit, sie hält unsere Wirtschaft stark. Es braucht klare Regeln und eine Zentralbank, die sich an ihren Auftrag hält! Dafür ist Präsidentin Lagarde die Falsche.

     
       

     

      Fernando Navarrete Rojas (PPE). – Mr President, Commissioner, President Lagarde, I want to begin by recognising the successful job the ECB has done under your leadership in ensuring price stability amid major shocks. A soft landing is now within reach – well done.

    Dear colleagues, this recognition, however, should not blur our judgement on the digital euro initiative. We all agree on the need to digitally proof the single currency, but does this require giving citizens a direct access to the ECB balance sheet, thus facilitating bank runs? Can untested safeguards like holding limits withstand political and financial stress? Should an innovation be led by the private sector? Is a digital euro based on central bank money the best solution to our dependencies in the payment area?

    Regardless of our answers, the potential issuance of a digital euro would be one of the most consequential decisions in financial policy. It will have far‑reaching consequences beyond monetary policy in areas like financial stability, innovation in payments and citizens’ privacy, just to name a few.

    Dear colleagues, regardless of our standing on the substance, the only thing we cannot do as parliamentarians is to relinquish our duty by a massive delegation of power in these domains. Don’t you think it is for us, co‑legislators, to co‑decide if and when the conditions for the issuance of a digital euro are met? I do think so, not least because I truly believe in central bank independence when conducting monetary policy.

     
       

     

      Jonás Fernández (S&D). – Señor presidente, señora comisaria, señora presidenta, un placer tenerla aquí y aprovechar este debate que tenemos cada año no solamente para discutir los detalles del informe que votamos mañana, sino para hablar de política monetaria y de la actividad del Banco Central Europeo.

    Y yo creo que, a la vista de los indicadores, de las estimaciones, de los datos que conocemos, hay aún margen para reducir los tipos de interés, y creemos que por ahí debemos ir porque las tasas de crecimiento además están muy muy apagadas en el conjunto de la Unión Europea.

    Pero créanme que en ese margen para reducir tipos de interés hay una notable incertidumbre —hablaba usted de ella previamente—, y no es otra que el nuevo Gobierno de Donald Trump en Estados Unidos y la guerra arancelaria que parece que hemos iniciado. Yo creo que es importante ser contundente: creo que es importante que Europa refuerce su autonomía estratégica y responda con fuerza, y hay instrumentos para hacerlo que pueden no entrar en colisión con el objetivo de estabilidad de precios, y hay muchos.

    Pero, hablando de autonomía estratégica, yo quiero decir también a la Comisión y al BCE que mi Grupo, el Grupo de Socialistas y Demócratas, está preparado para negociar el euro digital y esperamos avanzar en los próximos meses, y que, además, si queremos mejorar la autonomía estratégica, tenemos que garantizar la seguridad de nuestro sistema bancario europeo. Y cuando otras jurisdicciones como la estadounidense parece que retrasan sine die la implementación de Basilea, yo creo que en Europa tenemos que empezar a hablar de revisar los regímenes de equivalencia de los bancos estadounidenses: no podemos compartir una carrera de reducción de la regulación en la supervisión.

     
       

     

      Pierre Pimpie (PfE). – Monsieur le Président, chers collègues, je vous le dis, le mal est fait. La BCE a déversé sur les marchés des milliers de milliards d’euros. C’était le fameux assouplissement quantitatif. Tel un dealer, elle a pendant des années donné le goût de l’argent gratuit, de la facilité, de l’absence d’efforts, pour mieux ferrer ses clients.

    Des pays comme la France sont devenus drogués, dans l’incapacité de se passer du roulement de la dette. Ils ont renoncé à leur souveraineté financière en contrepartie de doses d’argent de plus en plus létales.

    Désormais, la BCE cesse d’acheter les dettes souveraines sur le marché secondaire. Le sevrage risque de s’avérer critique. Le piège se referme. Les États sont devenus dépendants de la BCE. L’argent gratuit est devenu très cher et la crise financière s’annonce plausible, sinon probable, dans les prochains mois. J’augure que le drogué suppliera son dealer de lui fournir une injection redoublée.

    Quel cynisme de la part de l’Europe de Francfort, qui appelle à la rigueur budgétaire après avoir prôné la relance à toute berzingue! Comme tout dealer responsable de l’addiction de ses clients, la BCE devra rendre des comptes.

     
       


     

      Engin Eroglu (Renew). – Herr Präsident! Sehr geehrte Frau Präsidentin Lagarde! Sehr geehrte Frau Kommissarin! Vielen Dank, Frau Lagarde, dass Sie wieder bei uns im Haus sind. Ich freue mich sehr, immer wieder mit Ihnen hier oder im Ausschuss diskutieren zu können. Denn ich denke, der Austausch in so schwierigen Zeiten ist wirklich von Bedeutung und wichtig.

    Frau Lagarde, ich möchte auf den aktuellen Bericht eingehen – aber das bezogen auf ein Interview von Ihnen, das ich am 31. Januar in der Financial Times lesen durfte. Herzlichen Glückwunsch zu diesem tollen Interview! Sie haben es gemeinsam mit Frau von der Leyen geschrieben oder gegeben.

    Da ist genau das Problem, Frau Lagarde, Sie hören es hier von vielen Kollegen: die Marktneutralität, die Preisstabilität. Viele unserer Kollegen im Haus, die wirkliche Experten für Finanzen sind, haben das Gefühl, dass irgendwo die Neutralität unserer EZB verloren gegangen ist – und dass Sie eine gefährliche Nähe zur Kommission und zu Staatschefs haben. Deswegen halte ich es wirklich für schwierig, dann ein gemeinsames Interview zu lesen, obwohl Sie, und da möchte ich Sie ausdrücklich loben, Frau Lagarde – die Punkte, die Sie in dem Interview benannt haben, sind genau richtig. Sie haben gesagt, wir müssen die Überregulierung im Bankensektor abbauen. Die Antwort ist sehr simpel. Hier in diesem Haus der große Fehler: Taxonomie und ESG – eine völlige Überregulierung des Bankensystems. Dann haben Sie zu Recht bemängelt, dass die Unternehmen nicht ausreichend Finanzmittel zur Finanzierung unserer Unternehmen herausgeben. Ja, harte Eigenkapitalquote runter, das ist die Antwort darauf. Dann ein anderer Punkt: die Energiepreise. Natürlich sind die Energiepreise viel zu hoch. Die Antwort darauf: Wir brauchen mehr fossiles Gas von so vielen Anbietern wie möglich.

    Frau Lagarde, meine inständige Bitte: Kommen Sie zur Neutralität zurück und hören Sie nicht auf den linken Teil dieses Hauses. Eine Marktneutralität infrage zu stellen bedeutet, den Euro kaputt zu machen und damit unsere Demokratie an die Wand zu fahren.

     
       

     

      João Oliveira (The Left). – Senhor Presidente, Senhora Lagarde, a sua política de combate à inflação a partir do Banco Central Europeu é errada, é injusta e tem de ser alterada. É errada porque quer combater a inflação, esmagando o poder de compra do povo em vez de intervir nos preços. É injusta porque arruína a vida dos trabalhadores e das pequenas e médias empresas, mas garante lucros escandalosos aos bancos e aos grupos económicos. A rapidez da subida das taxas de juro não foi a mesma na descida, e a situação é insustentável. As famílias continuam sufocadas com os custos do crédito à habitação. As pequenas e médias empresas enfrentam dificuldades com o aumento dos custos do crédito, mas o custo de vida não para de aumentar porque os grupos económicos continuam a fixar os preços «à Lagardère» como bem querem e lhes apetece. Os lucros dos bancos em 2024 renderam aos seus acionistas 123 mil milhões de EUR de dividendos. Só em Portugal, em 2024, os maiores grupos económicos e financeiros tiveram 32 milhões de lucros por dia. Senhora Lagarde, mude de política porque com esta política arruína a vida do povo. O caminho certo e justo é o da rápida descida das taxas de juro para aliviar as famílias e as pequenas e médias empresas. O caminho certo e justo é o do combate à inflação, com medidas de controlo, fixação ou tabelamento de preços, sobretudo de bens essenciais, cujos preços aumentaram de forma especulativa nos últimos anos. É esse o desafio que lhe fazemos.

     
       

     

      Rada Laykova (ESN). – Mr President, the term inflation originates from price inflation or monetary inflation, the latter referring to an increase in the money supply. Price inflation inevitably follows monetary inflation. Yet, this report does not mention monetary inflation, not even once. Instead, it falsely attributes price increases solely to external factors, such as energy markets and the war in Ukraine. But inflation in the Eurozone is fundamentally driven by monetary policy, and the only institution controlling the money supply is the ECB.

    In the ECON Committee, we have observed continued support from some political groups for expansionist monetary policies, primarily to finance deficit spending. Instead of ensuring price stability, the ECB is now expected to counterbalance consequences of unsustainable EU economic policies by printing more money. This approach not only contradicts the ECB statute but also risks worsening the economic situation.

    The ECB was created with a single mandate: price stability. Yet today, it has expanded its role to include climate change, economic redistribution and even global peace efforts. Can an institution struggling to fulfil its core responsibility effectively take on such additional tasks?

    Rather than relying on continuously monetary expansion, the EU should focus on addressing its economic policy failures, excessive regulations and the unintended consequences of self‑sanctioning. Europeans are increasingly aware of these issues, and they’re questioning the policies that have led to economic uncertainty and the declining value of the euro. They understand exactly where the responsibility lies – within the ECB and this very institution.

     
       

     

      Lídia Pereira (PPE). – Senhor Presidente, as taxas de juro estão a descer, mas, mais do que anúncios e notícias, as famílias precisam de sentir um alívio real no custo de vida. Há dois anos, com taxas de inflação acima dos 10 %, só podíamos estar apreensivos. Hoje, esse tempo parece longínquo, mas temos de evitar triunfalismos. A inflação estabilizou, sim, mas ainda está acima do objetivo de médio prazo; e, numa Europa que queremos que cresça em conjunto, não podemos ter taxas de inflação de 1 % num país e de 5 % noutro. Temos de crescer juntos e para isso também temos de agir juntos.

    O que também me parece longínquo, mas que recordamos bem, foi o alinhamento da extrema‑esquerda e da extrema‑direita contra decisões de política monetária do Banco Central Europeu. E também nos recordamos bem da cedência dos socialistas a essa pressão mediática. Como sempre, as eleições estiveram à frente do sentido de responsabilidade. Já nós, estamos onde sempre estivemos, no respeito pela independência do Banco Central. Com opiniões, é certo, mas sem ceder à tentação de mentir às pessoas sobre os poderes de umas e outras instituições europeias. A minha opinião não é de agora: a política monetária tem de se normalizar, mas os efeitos das descidas têm de chegar mais rapidamente ao bolso das famílias. E, por outro lado, não podemos esperar tudo do Banco Central Europeu e não fazer a nossa parte, assumindo reformas que teimam em não sair dos relatórios. As pessoas já não precisam de mais anúncios, precisam das consequências desses anúncios. Do BCE espera‑se independência e deste Parlamento espera‑se ação.

     
       

     

      Aurore Lalucq (S&D). – Monsieur le Président, Madame la Présidente, Madame la Commissaire, les moments de crise sont de vrais révélateurs: révélateurs de la qualité des personnes, de leur courage, de leur intégrité, de leur fiabilité ou non, révélateurs des lignes politiques et des valeurs profondes qui nous animent, des moments où les masques tombent. Et nous sommes exactement dans l’un de ces moments.

    Si les démocrates critiquent, parfois débattent, se débattent, les populistes attaquent toujours. Ils attaquent à la fois la démocratie, les institutions et in fine la souveraineté. Notre monnaie, notre banque centrale n’y échapperont pas. Or, c’est bien sur la Banque centrale européenne que nous avons pu compter à chaque crise. C’est bien la Banque centrale européenne qui anticipe les crises. Et nous, allons-nous les anticiper un jour?

    Nous devons défendre la Banque centrale européenne et notre monnaie, nos piliers institutionnels de souveraineté en leur donnant deux outils. Le premier outil est l’euro numérique – je ne comprends pas ce que nous attendons, chers collègues –, le second, le budget pour prendre le relais de la politique monétaire.

    J’attends de nous que nous soyons responsables, que nous ne soyons pas populistes. Faisons bien attention à ce que nous disons sur la Banque centrale européenne et l’euro dans le moment actuel.

     
       

     

      Angéline Furet (PfE). – Monsieur le Président, Madame Lagarde, le rapport 2024 de la Banque centrale européenne confirme une réalité alarmante: sous prétexte de résilience et de stabilité, la BCE a continué d’imposer des politiques monétaires qui étouffent nos économies nationales. Elle a persisté à maintenir des taux directeurs élevés, pénalisant nos PME et nos agriculteurs, déjà fragilisés par des réglementations environnementales absurdes et un marché unique asphyxiant.

    Pire, ce rapport ignore l’essentiel: la souveraineté des États. La BCE, inféodée à la vision fédéraliste, instrumentalise la politique monétaire pour renforcer le pouvoir bruxellois au détriment des nations. Quand elle évoque une approche fondée sur les données, elle oublie les données humaines: chômage, désindustrialisation et détresse rurale qui frappent la France. Au nom de la transition verte, elle encourage des investissements pharaoniques dans des technologies inaccessibles à nos territoires, tandis que nos paysans croulent sous les normes et les coûts énergétiques.

    La compétitivité de l’Europe? Un leurre, quand nos entreprises sont étouffées par des prix de l’énergie structurellement plus élevés qu’ailleurs. Nous devons refuser cette fuite en avant technocratique. La France a besoin de retrouver le contrôle de sa politique économique, de sa monnaie et de son destin.

    Plutôt que de suivre aveuglément les dogmes de Francfort, exigeons une BCE au service des peuples, pas des idéologies.

     
       

     

      Bogdan Rzońca (ECR). – Panie Przewodniczący! Pani Prezes! W imieniu ECR chciałem bardzo jednoznacznie powiedzieć, że ten dokument, który przygotował Parlament, jest lepszy niż dokumenty z poprzednich lat.

    Jako ECR uważamy, że Europejski Bank Centralny powinien przede wszystkim brać pod uwagę podstawowe parametry gospodarcze poszczególnych państw. Wtedy jego interwencje będą bardziej wiarygodne. I jeśli jest coś nadzwyczajnego, to oczywiście tak, EBC powinien pomagać. Europejski Bank Centralny musi być odporny na ideologię – absolutnie się z tym zgadzamy. Tak zwany zdrowy rozsądek naprawdę jest bardzo, bardzo potrzebny w działaniach tego banku. Nie powinno być preferencji żadnych firm, żadnych branż. Tylko czysta gospodarka i czyste interwencje banku właśnie w obszary kryzysowe.

    Jeśli chodzi o cyfrowe euro, to tu potrzeba więcej informacji, więcej rozmów, więcej debat na ten temat, ale prawdziwa wolność gospodarcza jest zawsze przy użyciu wolnych środków, żywej gotówki – i tego nie możemy blokować. Nie wolno bać się Stanów Zjednoczonych, należy brać stamtąd najlepsze rozwiązania. Wtedy Unia Europejska też będzie lepsza.

     
       

     

      Alexander Jungbluth (ESN). – Herr Präsident! Wenn man die Ausführungen heute hört, dann klingt das so ein bisschen, als hätte man ein Meisterwerk der Preisstabilität im EU-Währungsgebiet geschaffen. Aber ist es das wirklich? Nein, es ist ein Blendwerk, das die eigentlichen Versäumnisse dieser Institution verschleiern soll.

    Die EZB agiert längst als politischer Akteur und nicht als unabhängiger Hüter der Preisstabilität. Man möge sich fragen, wie das Ziel der Inflationsbekämpfung bei 2 % gelingen soll, wenn die EZB Märkte durch endlose Anleihenkäufe manipuliert. Damit wird keineswegs die Inflation gezähmt, sondern das Prinzip der Marktwirtschaft mit Füßen getreten. Wer zahlt am Ende die Zeche? Es sind unsere Sparer, es sind unsere Rentner.

    Ein weiteres Kapitel in diesem Trauerspiel ist der digitale Euro, angeblich eine Ergänzung zum Bargeld, doch in Wahrheit der perfekte Hebel zur totalen Überwachung und Kontrolle. Es ist nichts weiter als eine neue Dimension des staatlichen Eingriffs in das selbstbestimmte Leben der Bürger der Europäischen Union.

    Darüber hinaus verstrickt sich die EZB in zweifelhafte Projekte, die wie green bonds daherkommen. Man spricht von Klimaschutz, doch was steckt wirklich dahinter? Ein versteckter Umverteilungsmechanismus, bei dem unsere Bürger die Kosten für unhaltbare Schulden anderer Länder tragen sollen! Es ist ein Bruch europäischer Verträge, und es ist eine klare Beugung des geltenden Rechts.

     
       

     

      Dirk Gotink (PPE). – Voorzitter, president, commissaris, de afgelopen jaren hebben mensen in heel Europa koopkracht ingeleverd door de ongekende inflatie. Covid, de Russische invasie, het hakt er allemaal heel hard in, in het spaargeld, de pensioenen en in de algemene bestaanszekerheid. Dat merken mensen iedere dag door de hoge energieprijzen en de voedselprijzen. Deze inflatie in de eurozone is hardnekkig.

    Tegelijkertijd zie ik een Europese economie die niet vooruit te branden is door een tekort aan innovatie en een overschot aan detailwetgeving. U noemde het al: de barrières op de interne markt zijn nog veel te groot. Denk aan de territoriale leveringsbeperkingen waardoor onze boodschappen iedere dag te duur zijn in de supermarkten.

    Daarbij komt vergrijzing. Hoe gaan wij de zorgkosten en pensioenen financieren in de komende jaren, zeker in landen waar de pensioenen worden betaald uit de lopende begroting? Hoe houdbaar is dat op de lange termijn?

    En als klap op de vuurpijl hebben we Trump die op het punt staat om een waanzinnige handelsoorlog te ontketenen waardoor het dagelijks leven van honderden miljoenen mensen duurder kan worden. Dat zijn gewoon ordinaire Trump‑belastingen.

    In deze cocktail van onzekerheid heeft de ECB een sleutelrol om de inflatie te beteugelen en de randvoorwaarden te scheppen voor stabiele economische groei. Dat is haar oorspronkelijke mandaat. Ik zou dan ook de ECB en ook de Commissie willen oproepen om aan dat oorspronkelijke mandaat te hechten. Ook wil ik graag collega van Brug complimenteren voor het degelijke verslag dat zij hierover heeft geschreven.

     
       

     

      Matthias Ecke (S&D). – Herr Präsident! Frau Präsidentin Lagarde! Liebe Kolleginnen und Kollegen! Die Inflationsraten im Euro-Währungsgebiet sind gesunken, von einem Rekordhoch von 10,6 % auf nun nahe 2 %. Das ist erst einmal ein wichtiges Signal der Stabilität in Europa und eine gute Nachricht für Millionen von Menschen. Denn gerade wer ein kleines oder mittleres Einkommen hat, der musste unter der Kostenexplosion der letzten Jahre besonders leiden. Inflation ist nicht nur eine ökonomische Frage, sondern auch eine soziale Frage. Und deswegen ist es richtig, den Kampf gegen die Inflation nicht allein der EZB zu überlassen.

    Die von Olaf Scholz geführte deutsche Bundesregierung zum Beispiel hat das erkannt und hat mehr gegen steigende Preise unternommen als alle anderen Regierungen in der EU – mit Energiepreisbremsen, Entlastungspaketen und einem günstigen Deutschlandticket. Das war klug und richtig. Als Sozialdemokraten sagen wir auch deutlich: Preisstabilität ist wichtig, aber reicht allein nicht aus. Die EZB muss auch zur wirtschaftlichen und sozialen Entwicklung der EU beitragen. Umso mehr freue ich mich, dass unsere diesbezüglichen Forderungen jetzt Gehör gefunden haben und der Bericht entsprechend angepasst wurde, was den Bereich secondary mandate angeht. Mit Trumps Politik der Willkür-Zölle drohen uns nun allerdings neue Preissteigerungen und Krisen. Wir erwarten, dass die EZB ihrer Verantwortung für Europas wirtschaftliche Entwicklung auch dabei gerecht wird.

     
       

     

      Γεάδης Γεάδη (ECR). – Κύριε Πρόεδρε, την τελευταία τετραετία στην Ευρωπαϊκή Ένωση καταγράφηκαν εξαιρετικά υψηλά επίπεδα πληθωρισμού, με αποτέλεσμα να μειωθεί η αγοραστική δύναμη των σταθερών εισοδημάτων, των αποταμιεύσεων και των συντάξεων, στρεβλώνοντας την αποτελεσματική κατανομή των πόρων με αρνητικό αντίκτυπο στην οικονομική σταθερότητα. Μπορεί ο πληθωρισμός, σύμφωνα με την έκθεση να έχει υποχωρήσει, όμως οι επιπτώσεις ακόμα παραμένουν βαθιά χαραγμένες στους πολίτες.

    Παραδείγματα: πρώτον, η αύξηση των τιμών ενέργειας με αλυσιδωτές επιπτώσεις στην οικονομία. Δεύτερον, τα υψηλά επίπεδα πληθωρισμού επηρεάζουν δυσανάλογα τα νοικοκυριά με χαμηλότερα εισοδήματα, τα οποία ξοδεύουν μεγαλύτερο ποσοστό του προϋπολογισμού τους σε είδη πρώτης ανάγκης, δημιουργώντας αναπόφευκτα συνθήκες δυσπραγίας, φτώχειας και κοινωνικού αποκλεισμού.

    Ως εκ τούτου, επιβάλλεται προσοχή και καλός σχεδιασμός για το μέλλον, με πολιτικές που δεν θα θυσιάζουν τους πολίτες στον βωμό των συμφερόντων των τραπεζών, όπως το 2013 που από άλλη θέση κλέψατε τα χρήματα των καταθέσεων των Κυπρίων πολιτών. Τέλος, αναφορικά με το ψηφιακό ευρώ, υπογραμμίζω τη θέση μας ότι πρέπει να χρησιμοποιηθεί ως συμπλήρωμα του χαρτονομίσματος και σε καμία περίπτωση ως αντικατάστασή του.

     
       

     

      Kinga Kollár (PPE). – Tisztelt Elnök Úr! Örömmel olvasom az EKB-jelentésben, hogy Európa visszatért az alacsony infláció világába. Így lehetőség nyílik a kamatok csökkentésére, ami olcsóbb lakás- és vállalati hiteleket jelent.

    Ez jó hír Európának. Azonban ki kell jelenteni, hogy Magyarországon a különutas gazdaságpolitika kudarcot vallott a vásárlók kezelésében. Ennek az árát pedig az emberek fizették meg. Öt év alatt 81%-kal emelkedett az élelmiszerek ára, az inflációt csak 13%-os rekord alapkamattal sikerült valamelyest megfékezni.

    Miközben az állam évek óta rekordmagas hiány mellett működik, tollvonással töröltek kritikus állami beruházásokat. Nem jut elég forrás kórházakra, az iskolákra, az utakra és vasútfejlesztésre.

    Az Orbán-rezsim kegyeltjeinek persze továbbra is nyitva vannak az állami pénzcsapok, így jutott például méregdrága irodaházakra. És a választási költekezés még csak most fog kezdődni Magyarországon.

    Pedig a túlköltekezés hatalmas kamatteherrel párosul. Csak tavaly a kormány 4000 milliárd forintot költött kamatokra, többet mint a teljes egészségügyre.

    Ezért minden magyar ember érdekében és nevében felszólítom a magyar kormányt, hogy ne gyermekeink és unokáink terhére próbálják megtartani hatalmukat.

    Megalázó szavazatvásárlás helyett a Tisza hazahozza az uniós forrásokat, és magyarok millióival együtt épít egy modern, békés és élhető Magyarországot.

     
       

     

      Carla Tavares (S&D). – Senhor Presidente, Senhora Presidente Lagarde, Senhora Comissária Maria Luís Albuquerque, no artigo que assinou há duas semanas no Financial Times, com a Presidente Ursula von der Leyen, assegurou que está pronta para fazer tudo o que seja necessário para trazer a Europa de volta. Essa foi a atitude que salvou o euro em 2010 e evitou uma crise financeira durante a COVID. Nessas crises, o BCE soube apoiar as políticas gerais da União, tal como está escrito no seu mandato secundário. É preciso desistir dos dogmas. Não podemos combater a inflação de forma cega ou deixar que a neutralidade de mercado seja um princípio escrito na pedra. Precisamos de ação e resultados. Por exemplo, ter uma coordenação mais próxima da política monetária e orçamental da União ou usar o mandato secundário para sermos mais ambiciosos nas políticas e instrumentos monetários. O atual clima de incerteza nos Estados Unidos abre também uma oportunidade para reforçarmos a promoção internacional do euro como uma alternativa credível ao dólar e avançarmos mais rapidamente no euro digital. Como refere no seu texto no Financial Times, em que me revejo, há muito em jogo. Não podemos mais desperdiçar as nossas forças com desvantagens autoimpostas.

     
       

     

      Regina Doherty (PPE). – Mr President, Commissioner, President Lagarde, we are here today discussing the ECB annual report. At times of enormous uncertainty, following on from Canada, Mexico and China, President Trump is threatening the EU with steep new tariffs. Billions of euros of investments and thousands of jobs depend on the trade between Europe and the United States. I have heard the concerns from people and businesses in Dublin about how America may soon be closed for business.

    European Member States, including my own, have strong historic, cultural and huge economic links with the United States, and we need to do everything we can to preserve this, and ensure that EU‑US relationships remain functional. Yet there are those who would have us turn away from one of our closest historic allies. And this literally would be the definition of cutting off your own nose to spite your face.

    President Lagarde, I want to welcome your words in the Financial Times recently with President von der Leyen, where you highlighted the need for Europe to be better at helping businesses to grow and thrive. We need to see the reforms to boost competitiveness and innovation.

    I also want to welcome the work that has taken place to bring down inflation by the ECB. This is why the ECB can now reduce our interest rates, which is very welcome. But for this to continue, all the Member States must be prudent. The time for talk is over and the time for action absolutely is now.

     
       


     

      Angelika Winzig (PPE). – Herr Präsident! Frau Kommissarin! Frau Präsidentin Lagarde! Krieg, Energiekrise, unzuverlässige Lieferketten und steigende Lebensmittelpreise haben in den letzten drei Jahren für die Europäerinnen und Europäer zu einem massiven Kaufkraftverlust geführt. Und eines darf man auch nicht außer Acht lassen: Sie haben in einigen Mitgliedstaaten auch zu politischen Veränderungen geführt.

    Während die US-Notenbank frühzeitig gehandelt hat, hatte man den Eindruck, die EZB hat zu lange gezögert – mit spürbaren Folgen für die europäische Wirtschaft und für die Bürgerinnen und Bürger. Eine Währung ist nur so stark wie die Wirtschaft, die hinter ihr steht. Daher muss Europa seine Wettbewerbsfähigkeit steigern, um den Euro langfristig abzusichern. Weniger Bürokratie, mehr Innovationen, gezielte Investitionen für Wirtschaft und Banken braucht es jetzt dringend, um nachhaltiges Wachstum zu sichern.

    Auch Sie, Frau Präsidentin, werden dazu einen entscheidenden Beitrag leisten. Nur mit echten Reformen sichern wir Europas wirtschaftliche Zukunft und sorgen dafür, dass Wohlstand nicht nur ein Versprechen bleibt, sondern für alle Europäerinnen und Europäer auch spürbar ist.

     
       



       

    Interventions à la demande

     
       

     

      Maria Grapini (S&D). – Domnule președinte, doamnă comisară, doamna Lagarde, am văzut că ați fost felicitată de colegi și am fost foarte atentă la ce ați spus dumneavoastră. Între altele, ați criticat gospodăriile că nu cheltuie mai mult. Doamna Lagarde, știți câți oameni sunt în sărăcie? Cum să cheltuiască mai mult când nu știu ce se întâmplă, când n-au suficienți bani, decât să-și plătească lumina, curentul?

    Din punctul meu de vedere, BCE n-a făcut cât ar trebui să facă, din punctul de vedere al politicii monetare, din punctul de vedere al presiunii care e suportată de cei mai săraci, de fapt, inflația, dobânzile. Știți cât e dobânda în țara mea, în România? Cum? IMM-urile sunt spulberate.

    Deci, din punctul meu de vedere, dumneavoastră sunteți responsabili. Ați spus că veniți la întâlniri cu noi. Foarte bine, dar aveți niște specialiști pe salarii foarte mari acolo. Ei trebuie să facă politica monetară. Ei trebuie să ne asigure existența și rezistența în piața internă a economiei, până la urmă, pentru a putea să fim în competiție globală.

     
       

     

      Vytenis Povilas Andriukaitis (S&D). – Posėdžio pirmininke, gerbiama Europos Centrinio Banko pirmininke ponia Lagarde, komisare. Suprantama, didelis pasiekimas, kad suvaldyta infliacija, be galo didelis pasiekimas, kad garantuotas euro stabilumas. Be galo svarbu toliau atkreipti mums visiems dėmesį į be galo sudėtingą tarptautinę aplinką. Jungtinių Amerikos Valstijų dabartinė administracija grasins tarifais. Komisija Jean’o-Claude’o Junkerio laikais jau turėjome patirtį, kaip atremti Trumpo tarifų karą. Dabar taip pat reikia galvoti apie tai. Reikia būtinai galvoti apie kuo didesnes pastangas kurti bankų sąjungą Europos Sąjungoje. Priešingu atveju mes labai nesuvaldysime bankų nesąžiningos veiklos. Reikia paskatinti skaitmeninio euro įvedimą, ir tai reikia daryti ypatingai greitai, nes šiuo atveju mes turime atremti mums gresiančias tikrai tarifų karų, kainų karų situacijas. O tuo tarpu bendros pastangos Europos Centrinio Banko ir nacionalinių bankų turi būti stiprinamos.

     
       


     

      Siegbert Frank Droese (ESN). – Herr Präsident! Madame Lagarde, ich hatte Ihrem Bericht gelauscht, und ich muss ehrlich sagen, ich hatte Mühe, nicht einzuschlafen.

    Wenn wir zu unserem wichtigsten Partner, den USA, schauen: Dort gibt es Aufbruch, dort wird aufgeräumt, dort wird gerade das goldene Zeitalter ausgerufen. Die USA bereiten gerade ihren Platz in der neuen Welt des 21. Jahrhunderts. Lagardes Bericht fehlt jede positive Vision für die Zukunft Europas: kein Wort zum Ende des Green Deals durch Donald Trump, kein Wort dazu, dass BlackRock, Vanguard – große Investoren – in Zukunft nicht mehr in grünen Klimairrsinn investieren werden.

    Ein bisschen Resilienzgedöns, ein bisschen Digitalisierungsblabla und Wettbewerbsappelle sind zu wenig. Madame Lagardes Rede war blutleer und hoffnungslos. Es kann einem damit nur angst und bange werden um die Zukunft Europas.

     
       

     

      Lukas Sieper (NI). – Herr Präsident! Liebe Menschen Europas, heute haben wir hier über die Europäische Zentralbank gesprochen. Und ja, auch im Namen der Partei des Fortschritts muss ich sagen: Kritik ist berechtigt. Die EZB beeinflusst das Leben von Millionen von Menschen und muss sich auch solch einer Debatte stellen. Aber während ich hier aus der politischen Mitte dieses Hauses von den Moderaten konstruktive Vorschläge wahrgenommen habe, höre ich von den Extremen, die EZB sei voreingenommen, politisch motiviert gesteuert. Diese Behauptung ist nicht nur falsch, sie ist gefährlich. Aber diese Rhetorik passt ja zu Ihnen: Ja, alle sind miteinander verschworen, wollen es dem kleinen Mann schwer machen und erlauben sich auch noch, das Klima retten zu wollen.

    Ich sage Ihnen: Wer seine ganze Politik darauf aufbaut, das Vertrauen in die demokratischen Institutionen zu untergraben, ist kein Demokrat. Frau Lagarde, ich habe 26 meiner 27 Lebensjahre mit der EZB gelebt. Sie wissen, da ist immer noch Luft nach oben. Aber weiter so!

     
       

       

    (Fin des interventions à la demande)

     
       

     

      Maria Luís Albuquerque, Member of the Commission. – Mr President, honourable Members, I am pleased to see that there is a significant convergence in the views of our three institutions on many aspects of the report. As already mentioned in my introductory remarks, the EU has high ambitions and urgently needs to regain competitiveness. This requires massive investments and, hence, financing.

    Open, deeper and more integrated capital markets will be key to improve the competitiveness of the EU economy. This is why we will present a savings and investments union strategy in the coming weeks. The savings and investments union will leverage the enormous wealth of European savers to create growth in Europe. Fundamentally, greater liquidity pools and the EU markets operating at a greater scale are absolutely necessary if we want to see stronger economic growth, compete internationally and finance our political ambitions. There is simply no other way.

    As a last point, let me also recall the importance of making progress on the digital euro, given the challenges we face in terms of innovation and global competition. Today, Europeans increasingly pay digitally, and this trend will continue, reflecting the digitalisation of our societies. But, at this moment, we don’t have a European offer that allows for digital payments across the EU and for all the use cases. In fact, Europeans mainly rely on a few non-European providers, as was mentioned here today.

    The Commission stands ready to support efforts to accelerate the negotiations. It is equally important to progress on the proposal for the legal tender of cash. These regulations will safeguard the acceptance and availability of cash for our citizens. Also here, the Commission stands ready to support the ongoing discussions on this, so that we can make swift progress.

     
       

     

      Christine Lagarde, Présidente de la Banque centrale européenne. – Madame la Commissaire, en ayant pris note de vos observations…

    Let me now move back to English, but I thought a little bit of French would not hurt, because you are still around, Mr Vice-President, although you’re leaving – that’s okay.

    So let me tackle three points that I would like to address in response to your many, many questions, and with gratitude for some of your candid points, some of your documented points, but certainly some that you have expressed with great passion. And I’m very attentive and very sensitive to it.

    Let me just make a few points about the mandate under which we operate, so a little bit about how we took the fight against inflation and finished with the digital euro – and I think that I will have tried to focus on those areas where you have really yourself tried to target your questions.

    So, on my first point, I am constantly reminded of the mandate that we have under Article 127 of the Treaty we know – at the European Central Bank at all levels of the institution – that our primary objective is price stability. There is no debate about that. We also know that there is a second paragraph, which refers to secondary objectives, which have to do with your economic objectives and how we can support those objectives. But this second article is very specific and starts with ‘without prejudice to price stability’. So it goes without saying that price stability is the driving force, and that alternative options have to be without prejudice to that driving force of our action. Price stability is what is guiding us.

    Now, I would like to just mention, because this has been also raised and many of you have actually raised it, this issue of market neutrality. And you, Madam rapporteur, focused some of the remarks and some of the points in the resolution on this aspect, and I am delighted that you could reach a consensus as to exactly what the report would say.

    But I just want to mention the fact that market neutrality has not always been absorbed invariably, and there have been moments in the history of the ECB, prior to my time, when market neutrality was derived from because it was necessary and appropriate in order to deliver on price stability. What we are doing when we pay attention in particular to the externality of the risk of climate change, is that we are looking after and securing the balance sheet of the ECB to make sure that the risks, which are not otherwise reflected by market mechanisms, can actually be embedded into our management of the portfolio. Now, this, in many ways, is a story of the past because, as you know, we are no longer in the business of purchasing assets and in particular not purchasing corporate assets anymore.

    A few points about the fight against inflation, because many of you have actually mentioned this – one of you actually said that we had done a good job and, you know, those are moments when you enjoy the minute and a half that was given to I think it was Mr Navarrete, who actually said that he was satisfied with the work that we had done. And yes, we did take the fight against inflation and, as your resolution report indicates, we could have started earlier. We started effectively signalling that we were going to take action in December 2021 and then we took very vigorous action by actually raising interest rates by 450 basis points in a fast, robust way, and more so than any time before. And we have now seen the result of it. One of you mentioned that we went from a high of 10.6 % in October 2022, which was the highest reading that we had on an average basis, not on a per country basis, I know, because some Member States have much higher and have had much higher inflation, but on average we went from that 10.6 % in October 2022 to 2.5 % now in January. So I’m not saying that the fight is over because we need to get to the target that we have, but we have closed the gap significantly by taking robust and rapid measures.

    And you cannot compare one central bank to the other. The circumstances are different. The fundamentals of the economy are different. The rates of inflation suffered by different countries are different. And the tools that are available are different as well. But, you know, I don’t take huge satisfaction about what we have done, but I think that for all European compatriots, certainly there has been a difference. Does it mean to say that prices have gone down? No. And the level of prices is something that is very different from inflation. Prices have gone up, their level has stayed high. And the inflation that we are now trying to keep under control, hopefully at 2 % in the course of 2025, that is the measure by which the level continues to go up in a relatively modest way and the one that we have defined as our price stability objectives.

    Let me now touch on a point that many of you have addressed, and that is the issue of the digital euro. Let me preface that with the fact that the digital euro is not intended to replace cash – absolutely not. Cash is around, will be around, no question about it. So much so that we are currently – as you may have seen – working on the new face of our European banknotes so that the euro will have a more relatable aspect to it, so that a European – and non-European for that matter – using the euro will actually appreciate the aspects that embody Europe, whether it is by way of reference to culture or by way of reference to nature. The jury is still out as to what it will end up being, but certainly cash will be around.

    Some of you have mentioned that the digital euro is a tool of our European sovereignty, and I would beg you to keep that in the back of your mind when you have that debate in Parliament. Many of you have called for that debate. I heard honourable Member of Parliament Ferber mention that. I have heard an honourable Member Navarrete referring to the debate and calling for it, actually. I have heard many other Members ask for that debate to take place. So please, as quickly as is possible, let us have that debate, because the digital euro is a necessary tool of this sovereignty. It’s not the only one. It needs to operate at retail level, at wholesale level, and it needs to be combined so that we have solidity of payment infrastructure, as well as the tools that will enable us to effect payment on a cross-border basis.

    The issues that have been referred to as issues to be debated – financial stability, innovation, privacy, threshold – all of that needs to be debated. Do not assume that it is something that the European Central Bank will decide from the main building sitting on the River of Main in Frankfurt. No, we are waiting for you and the ball is in your camp. I very much hope that the honourable rapporteur will actually mandate as many of goodwill around the table as possible in order to move that debate. I would very much dislike to see myself in this position in a year’s time, still arguing that the digital euro is an instrument of our sovereignty. A lot of things are going to happen between now and a year from now. We should not underestimate the geopolitical movements, fractures, cracks and divides that we might be seeing in the future.

    For that, we should be equipped with the digital currency that will help the defence of our sovereignty – and I turn to you who didn’t find me very passionate about the future, but you’re not listening to me really. Doesn’t matter. I passionately believe that we have, internally in Europe, barriers that we have imposed upon ourselves that we can remove, whether it is in the goods circulation equivalent of 40 % custom duties that we impose on ourselves, as opposed to 15 % inside the United States, or 110 % equivalent of custom duties that we impose on ourselves on services. We have the tools at hand to be more productive, which will lead to better competitiveness. So I’m very passionate about that. But my real passion is to deliver on our mandate, which is price stability for all our citizens.

     
       

       

    IN THE CHAIR: SOPHIE WILMÈS
    Vice-President

     
       

     

      Anouk Van Brug, rapporteur. – Voorzitter, vandaag spreekt de Europese politiek met een duidelijke stem. De ECB toont een sterke ambitie op het gebied van klimaatverandering, maar lijkt de impact van geopolitieke spanningen op inflatie te onderschatten. Wij roepen u daarom op: neem geopolitiek serieus.

    De wereld verandert snel. Oorlog en conflict hebben de afgelopen jaren keer op keer laten zien hoe ze inflatie kunnen aanwakkeren en onze economie kunnen ontwrichten. De energiecrisis die volgde op de Russische invasie in Oekraïne was geen incident, maar een waarschuwing. Geopolitieke instabiliteit zal de komende jaren een grote rol blijven spelen in de economie.

    Daarom is het essentieel dat de ECB scenario’s ontwikkelt en voorbereid is op toekomstige crises. Want wanneer je hard werkt in Nederland, moet je leuk kunnen leven en je geen zorgen hoeven maken over een nieuwe rekening of een wasmachine die kapotgaat. Het is tijd om de geldzorgen van de mensen thuis serieus te nemen. Dit is mogelijk wanneer de ECB geopolitieke risico’s serieus neemt, maar ook haar eigen rol scherp bewaakt.

    Echte onafhankelijkheid betekent: geen politiek bedrijven. De ECB heeft één taak: prijsstabiliteit handhaven. Dit vereist strikt marktneutraal beleid zonder dat de ECB politieke keuzes maakt in haar opkoopprogramma’s en andere instrumenten. De ECB mag zich niet laten leiden door politieke druk of ideologische agenda’s — dat ondermijnt haar geloofwaardigheid en effectiviteit.

    Wij vragen u dan ook: behoud de neutrale rol van de ECB. Laat de financiële markten functioneren zonder onnodige verstoringen en zorg ervoor dat de ECB onafhankelijk blijft in daden, niet alleen in naam. Alleen zo kunnen we inflatie effectief bestrijden en de koopkracht van ons allemaal beschermen.

     
       

     

      President. – The debate is closed.

    The vote will be held tomorrow.

     

    14. Escalation of gang violence in Sweden and strengthening the fight against organised crime (debate)


     

      Maria Luís Albuquerque, Member of the Commission. – Madam President, honourable Members, the horrendous attack in Örebro – one of the worst attacks in Swedish history – has shocked as all to the core. And I would like to express my heartfelt condolences to the families and friends who lost their loved ones. Such attacks have no place in Europe.

    The first thing European citizens expect from us is protection. That is also true when it comes to the topic of today’s debate: gang violence. Gang violence is not only a big threat to life and security; it is a huge threat to democracy and society too, and it is part of the bigger structures of organised crime infiltrating our legal economies and processes.

    As outlined by President von der Leyen at the beginning of this mandate, there can be no hiding place for organised crime in Europe, either offline or online. The threat to our internal security by organised crime networks is unprecedented and increasingly visible. And it is not only an impression that we get following the news – the figures speak for themselves. Last year, Europol identified 821 high-risk criminal networks active in the EU. Nearly 90 % of them have infiltrated the legal economy, running businesses, investing in real estate. They are strong and operate freely across borders, including online. They are active in drug trafficking, fraud, property crime, migrant smuggling, and trafficking in human beings. To avoid prosecution, these groups are increasingly recruiting young people to perpetrate even violent crimes.

    Most of this violence is directly linked to organised crime and drug trafficking. Drug-related violence has spread from secluded port areas to the streets of Swedish cities, as criminal organisations fight for control over distribution networks. Innocent bystanders are often caught in this violence, underscoring the urgency of action.

    We see similar patterns across Europe: drug markets in Brussel’s streets, gang wars in Germany and France, threats to port workers in the Netherlands, drug-related killings in Spain and the Western Balkans. This is a global phenomenon that needs to be tackled through stronger cross-border cooperation within the EU and with third countries. Drugs are now Europe’s most lucrative criminal market, worth EUR 31 billion annually, and 70 % of organised crime groups use corruption to enable their crimes.

    The Commission will put forward an EU strategy against corruption. Money is the lifeblood that drives and sustains all these criminal activities. Our response to organised crime must be clear: disrupt their finances, take down their bankers and brokers, tackle the infiltration in the legal economy and disrupt their corrupt networks.

    Since last spring, we have new confiscation rules to eliminate the profits of criminal groups. We need to follow the money to get to those who are behind the crimes. Any investigation should pursue arrests and asset recovery as two sides of the same coin. With Eurojust we need to enhance judicial cooperation within the Union and beyond its borders. The rapid transposition of the new Asset Recovery Directive will provide stronger tools to confiscate illicit profits. It will also strengthen the asset recovery offices to identify, trace and freeze criminal assets.

    The Commission will step up the fight against serious and organised crime with the forthcoming European internal security strategy. The strategy will cover all forms of organised crime online and offline. We plan to involve all stakeholders in a ‘whole of society’ approach to be more effective in dismantling high-risk criminal networks and their ringleaders. We will propose to revise the rules to fight organised crime, starting with an updated definition of ‘organised crime’ and strong investigative tools. The strategy will build on the serious and organised crime threat assessment that Europol will present in the spring. We will enhance Europol support to Member State investigations, especially in areas where the authorities need it the most. We will strengthen Frontex to ensure it can protect our borders in all circumstances.

    As regards the online dimension, online service providers have a duty to protect their users online. We will continue to strongly enforce the Digital Services Act, which establishes effective measures for tackling illegal content and mitigating societal risks online. And we will continue to step up our efforts in disrupting the recruitment of young people online by organised criminal gangs. Next year we will also set out the framework for an EU critical communication system to strengthen internal security and preparedness.

    We know that many of the threats to our internal security originate from outside the EU. Security within the Union cannot be achieved without targeted and comprehensive external action through third country partnerships that also benefit our security. The strategy will also address cross-cutting security challenges and hybrid threats such as border management, the weaponisation of migration, and countering sabotage and espionage.

    Honourable Members, as one of the first deliverables of the new internal security strategy, the Commission will launch a new EU action plan against firearms trafficking with more pressure on criminal markets and safeguarding the illicit market. Illicit firearms feed organised crime within the EU, and are regularly used by lone actors. The EU already has rules on the illegal possession and acquisition of firearms and rules on the legal import, export and transit of firearms. However, there are no EU rules on the definition of criminal offences and penalties on firearms-related crimes. This has to change.

    The fight against drug trafficking must also remain a top priority. For this, it is paramount to tackle the constant inflow of drugs to our continent, mainly through our ports. Over 90 million containers are processed yearly in EU ports. Only a small percentage are inspected, leaving room for criminal exploitation. Sweden, as a major maritime destination and transit country is not immune to this threat. We will build on the work set out in the EU roadmap and the EU Ports Alliance to dismantle criminal business models and to shut down supply routes. Currently, 33 ports, including Helsingborg, Gothenburg and Stockholm are members, and the list is growing.

    The challenges facing the Union are increasingly complex, interconnected and transnational. This means that we need to approach security in an integrated way, taking all relevant threats, including hybrid ones, into consideration. Internal security is our shared responsibility, and we want the forthcoming strategy to be also the Parliament’s strategy. We count on your cooperation to make rapid progress on our common agenda.

     
       


     

      Evin Incir, on behalf of the S&D Group. – Madam President, politics must join forces across party lines to break the cycle of violence. This painful reality is the reason why I decided to engage in politics 25 years ago. Since then, the situation has unfortunately only worsened. More children have become both victims and perpetrators to violence.

    Last year alone, 44 people lost their lives to shootings, and, alarmingly, the number of children under 15 suspected of involvement in murder cases surged by 200 % in comparison to the year before in Sweden. Just in the first month of this year, we witnessed 33 bombings. The perpetrators are nowadays so young that the term ‘child soldiers’ has become a buzzword. Gang violence is creeping down in age, instilling fear in our neighbourhoods and robbing children of their childhood. No one should wake up to a sound of a bomb, instead of a gentle ring of a clock. And let’s be clear – no one is born a child soldier.

    Our actions as lawmakers matter. The current Swedish right‑wing and far‑right Government looks to Denmark’s hard gang laws – like visitation zones and harsh penalties – but neglects the essential ingredient of Denmark’s success: social investments in schools and communities. A school that provides every child with the opportunity to succeed is our most powerful weapon against gang recruitment. It is also absurd that criminals in 2025 can start businesses and exploit the Swedish welfare system, while the parties in government and their supporters in Sweden Democrats are watching.

    Where is the crisis commission that we have asked for? Also, the EU has an important role in putting an end to the cross‑border gang crime, which poses a serious threat to all our Member States. According to Europol, 70 % of gangs in the EU operate in at least three countries simultaneously. I’m glad that the conservative EPP Group has woken up and realised the importance of acting, but yet they have only presented what they call ‘European security pact against organised crime’, which is more or less a copy paste of former Commissioner Ylva Johansson’s ‘EU roadmap to fight organised crime and drug trafficking’.

    Instead of creating new titles on existing measures, we social democrats demand a specific strategy against recruitment, with a coordinator working alongside European authorities such as Europol and Eurojust to prevent children and young people from falling into the claws of the gangs. Politics must unite across party lines, and so must other parts of the society, such as the social media platforms.

    We therefore need an EU anti‑organised crime law, including addressing the social media platforms responsibilities. It is unacceptable that these platforms are exploited for recruiting child soldiers. Tech giants must be held accountable. Their platforms are today’s modern streets and squares. It is about time for the society to get as organised as organised crime. The society must always be stronger than organised crime.

     
       

     

      Fabrice Leggeri, au nom du groupe PfE. – Madame la Présidente, la Suède, autrefois un modèle de sécurité en Europe, est aujourd’hui gangrenée par la violence de gangs. Fusillades en pleine rue, explosions criminelles, quartiers entiers sous l’emprise de mafias: ce chaos est le résultat direct d’années de laxisme migratoire et d’un aveuglement idéologique coupable.

    Les chiffres parlent d’eux-mêmes. En 2023, la Suède a enregistré 53 homicides liés aux guerres de gangs, un taux parmi les plus élevés d’Europe. 76 % des membres des principaux gangs sont des immigrés ou des enfants d’immigrés. Cette criminalité, alimentée par l’immigration massive et l’échec total de l’intégration, transforme des pans entiers du pays en zones de non-droit.

    Même le ministre suédois de la justice reconnaît aujourd’hui que cette violence prendra plus d’une décennie à éradiquer. Après des années de laxisme, le gouvernement suédois tente désormais de sauver les meubles en envisageant l’expulsion des criminels étrangers. Car la responsabilité de ce fiasco sécuritaire est politique.

    Il faut rappeler que c’est la famille politique d’Ylva Johansson, ancienne commissaire européenne aux affaires intérieures, qui a gouverné la Suède en appliquant cette politique d’ouverture migratoire sans contrôle. Cette même commissaire, qui expliquait, il y a encore quelques mois, que l’Europe n’a pas de problème d’immigration, porte une lourde responsabilité dans cette catastrophe sécuritaire.

    Nous devons tirer les leçons de cet échec suédois et être fermes. Ce qu’il faut à présent, c’est une impunité zéro pour les criminels étrangers et une expulsion immédiate. Il nous faut un véritable réarmement juridique et matériel des forces de l’ordre. L’Union européenne n’a plus le choix, elle doit mettre fin à l’immigration massive qui nourrit l’échec de l’intégration et alimente cette violence.

    La Suède est un avertissement. Si nous n’agissons pas maintenant, la France, par exemple, connaîtra le même destin. Ce que nous attendons aujourd’hui, c’est une Europe qui protège ses peuples, pas une Europe du chaos migratoire et du laxisme sécuritaire.

     
       

     

      Charlie Weimers, on behalf of the ECR Group. – Madam President, broken shards of glass hang like jagged teeth from a shattered window, the frame barely holds. Inside colourful children’s posters decorate the walls. A criminal threw an explosive device into a child’s bedroom. One man was injured. This isn’t fake news – this is a daily occurrence. This is last night in Sweden.

    Gang criminals have vowed in secret chats to make 2025 the worst year ever for bombings. Only Albania has more gun deaths than Sweden. Albania!

    A few years ago, Sweden’s former security chief admitted: ‘We are in a low‑intensity civil war’. Yet Swedish media still plays word games. ‘Gate explodes in Nacka’. Did the gate self-destruct? ‘Missed shooting in Växjö’: a miss because the bullet hit the wrong innocent?

    Meanwhile, the Swedish Social Democrats are criticising the tough measures that we in the liberal conservative majority in Sweden are taking against criminality, like visitation zones. Well, go have a debate with your own party that suggested that half of Stockholm was to be done a visitation zone. ‘Flip‑flop’ is what it’s called.

    Now, this is what the EU must do. Acknowledge that this is the result of uncontrolled immigration. Accept that we must secure the border. And yes, as the EPP finally has joined our stance, to limit free movement of criminals under Schengen. Act decisively to deport the illegals, fake asylum seekers and terrorist sympathisers. It must be done today. It should have been done yesterday.

     
       




     

      Alexander Sell, im Namen der ESN-Fraktion. – Frau Präsidentin! Schießereien, Vergewaltigungen, Bombenterror: Wer das Ergebnis linker Politik sehen möchte, muss nach Schweden schauen – jeden Tag Bombenanschläge durch afrikanische Banden, jedes Jahr 10 000 schwedische Frauen vergewaltigt, Malmö gefährlicher als Bagdad.

    Die Gewalt in Schweden ist das Ergebnis linker Migrationspolitik. Das haben die Wähler dort begriffen und unsere Kollegen von den Schwedendemokraten in die Regierung gewählt – trotz jahrelanger Beschimpfungen durch Politik und Medien. Die Propaganda wirkt nicht mehr. Die schwedischen Wähler haben den Ernst der Lage erkannt. Aus Schaden wird man klug.

    In der Regierung setzen die Schwedendemokraten jetzt das Programm um, für das in Deutschland nur die AfD steht: Grenzkontrollen, Sachleistungen, Remigration. Und zwar in Koalition mit den Christdemokraten. Wir müssen von den Schweden lernen. Auch in Berlin, Hamburg oder Duisburg gibt es Stadtteile, die von kriminellen Banden beherrscht werden: jeden Tag zwei Gruppenvergewaltigungen, allein in Berlin zehn Messerstechereien täglich.

    Wir müssen das ändern. Wir brauchen den Mut der Schweden in deutschen Wahllokalen. Am 23. Februar gilt: Schluss mit Feigheit und Brandmauer. Es ist allerhöchste Zeit.

     
       

     

      Lena Düpont (PPE). – Frau Präsidentin! Frau Kommissarin! Über 70 % der kriminellen Netze arbeiten grenzüberschreitend. Sie verdingen sich in Menschenhandel, Drogenhandel, Geldwäsche – zunehmend gewaltbereiter und brutal. Sieben der zehn gefährlichsten Netzwerke in Europa – im Übrigen 55 insgesamt an der Zahl – umfassen mehrere Nationalitäten. Acht von zehn arbeiten unter dem Deckmantel legaler Unternehmen. Organisierte Kriminalität war und ist immer eine immense Gefahr für unsere Ordnung, unseren Rechtsstaat, für unsere Wirtschaft, unsere Gesellschaft.

    Genauso wie diese Netzwerke jedes Schlupfloch, jede Möglichkeit nutzen, müssen auch wir das tun. Unsere Antwort muss koordiniert, unmissverständlich und vor allen Dingen unnachgiebig sein. Entziehen wir ihnen über die Arbeit der AMLA mit der Beweislastumkehr und der Konfiszierung von Vermögen endlich die finanzielle Grundlage. Unsere Sicherheitsbehörden müssen alle verfügbaren Instrumente zur effizienten Datenanalyse und -verknüpfung an die Hand bekommen. Zoll, Polizei, Dienste, Justiz, unsere Joint Investigation Teams brauchen Zugang zu allen für sie relevanten Informationen und Datenbanken. Sie sind nicht nur integraler Bestandteil einer Sicherheitsunion, sie stehen zugleich an vorderster Stelle, um unser Leben und unser Eigentum zu schützen. Wir müssen ihnen im Gegenzug Schutz gewährleisten. Das allein wird aber nicht reichen. Mit der Internal Security Strategy, mit der Preparedness Strategy, dem Whitepaper on Defence werden wir die nächsten Schritte gehen müssen, um diese, unsere Europäische Union gegen Bedrohungen und hybride Attacken von innen und außen abzusichern. Eine widerstandsfähige Demokratie wartet nicht auf Angriffe. Sie antizipiert sie, passt sich an und antwortet entschlossen. Das und nicht weniger müssen wir leisten.

    Ein letzter Kommentar zu meinem Vorredner: Am 23.2. wird jede Stimme für die AfD in Deutschland eine verlorene Stimme sein. Es wird keine Koalition geben.

     
       

     

      Sandro Ruotolo (S&D). – Signora Presidente, onorevoli colleghi, nello scorso mese in Svezia c’è stata in media un’esplosione al giorno. Ma non è un caso isolato, è un campanello d’allarme per tutta l’Europa.

    Io penso che lo Stato debba intervenire prima, sottraendo i nostri ragazzi alla manovalanza del crimine, alla morte civile. Ci sono poi i social network, moltiplicatori del disagio. Pensiamo all’omicidio di Salwan Momika, famoso per aver bruciato una copia del Corano in pubblico e ucciso a gennaio durante una diretta su TikTok.

    Lo Stato deve esserci prima, l’Europa deve esserci prima della violenza e noi dobbiamo esserci prima che sia troppo tardi. Servono investimenti nelle nostre periferie economiche, sociali, culturali.

     
       

     

      András László (PfE). – Madam President, ‘that we do not have control over the wave of violence is quite obvious’. This is a quote from the Swedish Prime Minister and a damning confession. Migrant gang wars have been plaguing Sweden for years now, and bomb attacks surged to a level comparable only to failed states. Citizens are scared and outraged for a reason.

    Who is to blame? The current government’s responsibility is limited in this mess. This is the fault of left‑wing elites who allowed mass immigration and adhered to the open borders ideology of George Soros. The EU’s migration policy is madness. More and more countries refuse to apply the rules. They bring chaos, violence, death and the breakdown of rule of law.

    Even in Sweden, even if you are one of the wealthiest and most respected nations on earth: Swedes, this may happen. Swedes simply deserve better. Yet the European Commission is still looking to punish those who defend our common external borders, like my country, Hungary.

    We need zero tolerance regarding illegal immigration. We need to support all the countries that defend our external borders, and we need to remove all illegals from the EU, and we need to severely punish all violent criminals. Gang warfare in European cities is un‑European. The European Commission’s weakness on border protection is anti-European. We need to make Europe great again. We need to make European borders secure again.

     
       

     

      Nicolas Bay (ECR). – Madame la Présidente, les gangs criminels ravagent la Suède. Après des décennies d’irresponsabilité et de laxisme migratoire, la population suédoise paie aujourd’hui le prix du sang avec deux tristes records: le premier, c’est celui d’être le premier pays en termes de mortalité par arme à feu de toute l’Europe, le second, c’est d’avoir 20 % de sa population qui est étrangère, soit deux millions d’immigrés sur dix millions d’habitants.

    La Suède a récemment essayé de changer de cap sous l’impulsion de la droite conservatrice et des démocrates suédois. On a enfin un changement de cap et, désormais, on a le plus faible nombre de demandeurs d’asile depuis quarante ans en Suède. Mais, évidemment, la situation est dramatique, et la situation de la France n’est d’ailleurs pas meilleure que celle de la Suède.

    Aujourd’hui, au Parlement européen, le ministre de l’Intérieur, Bruno Retailleau, vient parler de la directive retour. La directive retour ne sera réellement utile et efficace pour les Européens, pour nos nations et pour nos peuples que si elle permet la simplification, la fluidification et la rapidité des expulsions: faire en sorte que tous ceux qui sont entrés par ruse, par effraction ou grâce au laxisme en Europe n’aient qu’une seule certitude, celle d’être tôt ou tard expulsés d’Europe, avec l’impossibilité d’y revenir.

     
       

     

      Abir Al-Sahlani (Renew). – Fru talman! Sverige skakas av det brutala gängvåldet. Barn som agerar drogkurirer, tonåringar som agerar torpeder och giriga gängledare vars hänsynslöshet och brutalitet inte har några gränser och som styr sina olagliga verksamheter utanför Sveriges gränser. Detta är sannerligen ett europeiskt problem.

    Från 1 januari till i dag har det skett 33 detonationer och sprängningar runt om i Sverige. Vi har en regering i Sverige som i valrörelsen lovade ett paradigmskifte. Vi kan tyvärr inget annat än konstatera att den nuvarande regeringens politik inte har lyckats.

    Det finns många saker som borde ha gjorts annorlunda, som borde ha gjorts tidigare. Inte minst borde politiken fokusera mer på att strypa nyrekryteringen till gängen. Vår första försvarslinje här är föräldrar, lärare, skolpersonal, socialsekreterare och fältassistenter. Det är skolan och det är vårt förebyggande arbete som kommer att avgöra om dessa gäng finns kvar i framtiden.

    Än så länge är de digitala plattformarna, där mycket av rekryteringen av dessa ungdomar sker, inte tvingade av lagen att ta bort innehåll som annonser där man rekryterar barn.

    Pratar man med tullen i Sverige så ser man ganska snabbt att de är underbemannade. De är i dag 200 personer. De skulle egentligen behöva vara 400 personer, och EU:s hamnallians har kritiserat Sverige just för detta underskott. Men i stället för att satsa mer på skolan och ge ungdomar ett alternativ, i stället för att satsa på att ha bättre tullarbete, mer personal och bättre maskiner, så har politiken kokats ner till en tävling i hårdare straff och hårdare tag mot invandrare. Migrationspolitiken är inte verktyget för att lösa gängvåldet.

    Och en fråga: Hur vet du att det är afrikanska gäng som håller på i Sverige? När var du senast i Bagdad? Vad är det här för skitsnack?

    (Talaren godtog en fråga (“blått kort”).)

     
       



     

      Saskia Bricmont (Verts/ALE). – Règlements de comptes, fusillades, assassinats se multiplient dans les rues européennes, de Stockholm à Bruxelles. Des scènes inimaginables qui font peur pour notre sécurité et celle de nos enfants. Le crime organisé affecte les communautés en profondeur. Il présente aussi un risque bien plus large pour nos démocraties et l’État de droit, tant par ses effets directs que par les réponses liberticides qui sont actuellement apportées.

    Aucun discours simpliste, belliciste ou xénophobe n’apportera les réponses qu’attendent légitimement nos concitoyens. Oui, nous devons être exemplaires, agir de manière coordonnée et systémique avec des moyens allant de la prévention à la répression, de nos communes à l’Union européenne.

    Poursuivons le travail de réseau ici, au niveau européen: renforçons la lutte contre la corruption en élargissant les compétences du Parquet européen. Montrons de l’ambition pour la directive anticorruption, Madame la Commissaire, et assurons des moyens, du niveau local au niveau européen. Développons également la coopération judiciaire internationale en faisant pression sur les États, comme Dubaï, qui accueillent les narcotrafiquants, en permettant aussi que soient conclus rapidement des accords de coopération entre Eurojust et les pays d’Amérique latine. Enfin, harmonisons la réponse européenne face au crime organisé par une réponse législative pénale européenne.

     
       

     

      Alvise Pérez (NI). – Señora presidenta, ¡anda!, pero si hoy toca hablar de la criminalidad récord en Suecia, ese Disneyland progresista que han convertido desde la Comisión Europea y desde el propio Gobierno en un polvorín de casi ciento cincuenta atentados terroristas en solo diez años.

    Antes este país exportaba muebles y pop depresivos y ahora exporta bombas terroristas y narcotraficantes, algunos a mi país, a España. ¡Qué cosas! Aunque en realidad no mintieron a nadie, nos vendieron el cuento de la integración, de la convivencia y de la prosperidad, y lo han cumplido: integración del crimen, convivencia con el miedo y prosperidad para las mafias y para algunos políticos que se aprovechan de eso. Pero, bueno, no hay problema, porque en Suecia —lo han anunciado hace poco— han encontrado la solución mágica, que es pagar hasta treinta mil euros a los inmigrantes para que se larguen de su país. Es decir, primero los trajeron a Europa con cheques y ayudas, luego les concedieron barrios enteros y ahora les pagan para irse. Suecia, más que un país, parece una agencia de viajes para criminales. ¿El siguiente paso cuál es? ¿Repartir vales de avión para la vuelta a Kabul? ¿Un todo incluido en Somalia con dinero de los europeos?

    Y mientras tanto la Unión Europea sigue con su plan maestro, que es importar más problemas, prohibir que se hable de ellos y subvencionar a las ONG que los alimentan. Esta no es la Europa que a los españoles nos prometieron y no queremos formar parte de ella.

     
       

     

      Ana Miguel Pedro (PPE). – Senhora Presidente, Senhora Comissária, de Estocolmo a Paris, de Berlim a Bruxelas, assistimos à ascensão de cartéis de crime organizado que operam como verdadeiros grupos terroristas. E, perante isto, a Europa tem sido, demasiadas vezes, lenta e hesitante. A liberdade de circulação, um dos pilares fundamentais da União Europeia, tem sido instrumentalizada para facilitar o tráfico de seres humanos, narcotráfico, contrabando e lavagem de dinheiro. Sabemos que mais de 70 % das redes criminosas operam além-fronteiras e que sete em cada dez das mais perigosas envolvem cidadãos de múltiplas nacionalidades. Em primeiro lugar, estas organizações devem ser reconhecidas como uma ameaça direta à segurança nacional e combatidas com as mesmas medidas aplicadas ao terrorismo. Segundo, precisamos de reforçar a cooperação europeia. O crime não conhece fronteiras, e a nossa resposta também não pode conhecer. Nenhum criminoso pode encontrar refúgio apenas porque mudou de país. Defendemos o alargamento de poderes para a confiscação de ativos e a restrição da circulação de grupos criminosos, incluindo a imposição de proibições de entrada e limitações para cidadãos condenados por crimes graves. É igualmente urgente reforçar o mandado de detenção europeu e reforçar o combate ao tráfico ilegal de armas que alimenta esta escalada de violência. A Europa assenta na liberdade e no Estado de direito. Sem segurança, a liberdade é apenas um conceito vazio, esmagado pelo medo e pela violência. Não podemos aceitar que a nossa resposta seja tímida quando os criminosos agem sem medo.

    (A oradora aceita responder a uma pergunta «cartão azul»)

     
       



     

      Juan Fernando López Aguilar (S&D). – Señora presidenta, debatimos en esta sesión plenaria el incremento de la criminalidad organizada en Suecia, pero, en realidad, estamos hablando de un síndrome que recorre toda Europa: en primer lugar, la criminalidad organizada es la criminalidad de nuestro tiempo. En segundo lugar, sube el número de adolescentes —menores de edad— en la comisión de esos delitos, reclutados por las mafias. Y, en tercer lugar, la técnica de reclutamiento consiste en Instagram y en las redes sociales.

    No está pasando eso en todos los Estados miembros de la Unión Europea, no cabe ninguna demagogia —como la que utilizó, por cierto, la derecha contra el Gobierno socialdemócrata sueco— cuando lo cierto es que, bajo el Gobierno de la derecha sueca apoyado por la extrema derecha, esa criminalidad no ha hecho sino incrementarse.

    Por tanto, la receta está a la vista: el incremento de la cooperación policial y judicial especializada. En segundo lugar, aprovechar todo el caudal de experiencia de Eurojust y de Europol para confiscar no solamente las armas de fuego, sino también los beneficios ilícitamente obtenidos y su blanqueo. Y, en tercer lugar, la especialización digital en la lucha contra esta criminalidad: pruebas digitales y, por tanto, incremento de la tecnología en la eficacia contra el delito.

    Y —no puedo evitar mencionarlo— hay que combatir también la segregación, la exclusión de la que proviene la desigualdad, de la que proviene el incremento de la criminalidad.

     
       

     

      Mathilde Androuët (PfE). – Madame la Présidente, la Suède, autrefois l’un des pays les plus sûrs d’Europe, est aujourd’hui ravagée par la violence des gangs issus de l’immigration. En 2023, la Suède a recensé 363 fusillades liées à des règlements de comptes, causant 53 morts. Le taux d’homicides par arme à feu y atteint quatre tués par million d’habitants, contre 1,6 en moyenne en Europe. Aucun autre pays du continent européen n’a connu une hausse aussi vertigineuse. De la violence criminelle, fusillades, attentats à l’explosif, corruption, fraude sociale et proxénétisme, toute la panoplie du crime est assurée avec des exécutants recrutés parfois dès l’âge de douze ans.

    Les autorités suédoises l’admettent elles-mêmes: cette explosion criminelle est le fruit de décennies d’aveuglement migratoire et de communautarisme majoritairement islamiste. En vingt ans, la population étrangère est passée de 2 % à 15 %. Un bouleversement qui a favorisé la montée de bandes ethniques comme Foxtrot, Asir ou le réseau syrien, gangrenant jusqu’aux tribunaux et étendant leur menace jusqu’au Danemark, la Norvège ou la Finlande. Une situation comparable à bien d’autres pays européens, dont la France avec sa DZ mafia, où la loi du crime remplace la loi du droit et de la justice.

    Face à cette menace, la Suède amorce enfin un tournant avec l’expulsion de criminels étrangers, la déchéance de nationalité pour les délinquants binationaux ou encore le durcissement de l’asile.

    L’Europe doit prendre exemple de ce réveil politique post-traumatique. Appliquons un contrôle strict des frontières nationales comme européennes, ayons une double frontière, et amorçons la fin du laxisme généralisé, la tolérance zéro face à la délinquance. Ne laissons plus les mafias s’emparer des institutions, de vies humaines. Agissons avant qu’il ne soit trop tard.

    (L’oratrice accepte une question carton bleu)

     
       


     

      Mathilde Androuët (PfE), réponse carton bleu. – Je suis quelque peu désarçonnée par votre réponse politique qui consiste donc à investir dans les écoles, ce qui est une réalité éducative, mais qui n’enraiera aucunement la violence importée. Parce que je pense qu’on parle d’un des pays où le niveau d’investissement et de soins apportés à la croissance des enfants est important – c’est le cas, je pense, en Suède. En l’occurrence, tous les chiffres parlent d’eux-mêmes et montrent – pas uniquement en Suède d’ailleurs, mais partout en Europe – que, oui, cette violence est largement importée, ne vous en déplaise. Je sais.

     
       

     

      Paolo Inselvini (ECR). – Signora Presidente, onorevoli colleghi, qualcuno evidentemente ha bisogno di occhiali nuovi, perché ciò che sta accadendo in Svezia, come ciò che sta accadendo nelle città di tutta Europa, ha reso chiaro come le lenti ad alta gradazione ideologica della sinistra facciano vedere una realtà che non esiste.

    La realtà è che le gang, le violenze, gli stupri e lo spaccio di droga sono ormai all’ordine del giorno in tutta Europa, e questo a causa del perbenismo, del buonismo e dell’immigrazionismo della sinistra.

    È arrivato il momento, quindi, di mettersi gli occhiali della verità. Bisogna bloccare l’immigrazione incontrollata, combattere ogni droga e sostenere le forze dell’ordine, una strada, infatti, che il governo Meloni in Italia sta cercando di seguire da tempo.

    Infatti, tutti gli europei chiedono la libertà di poter vivere le proprie città, la libertà di essere sicuri.

     
       

     

      Raquel García Hermida-Van Der Walle (Renew). – Madam President, Madam Commissioner, let me begin by expressing my deepest condolences with the families and friends of the shooting in Sweden and, of course, to the Swedish people as a whole.

    The far right of this Chamber has only one solution for fighting organised crime: let’s close our borders and take back our country. But here comes a reality check. Criminals are laughing at your obsession with closing borders. For them, it’s just a line. It’s the point where they can shake off the national police. They operate extremely efficiently across borders, using bribes, laundering money through your beloved cryptocurrency, trafficking in weapons and recruiting new – very often very young – members for their gangs.

    Stop misleading Europeans with your naive idea of sovereignty and invest instead in our EU police and justice cooperation. At the beginning of the 20th century, when the American government was fighting their own criminal gangs, the Mafia, they tried closing state borders in and demonising migrants. You know, Mr Inselvini, those Italians, they were really bad. And to the colleagues from PiS: the Poles? Very bad. No good.

    Well, that did not work. But you know what worked? Founding the FBI. That did the trick. What Europe needs is a truly operational Europol. A European FBI with reinforced means, with oversight and with accountability. Also, Eurojust and the European Public Prosecutor’s Office urgently need more competences, as they have shown to be extremely effective and instrumental in fighting organised crime.

    Commission, absent Council, step up to the challenge. Give our common security the priority it needs. And to my colleagues, if you are really serious about fighting crime, then you will support every single effort in this House at European level. And if you’re not, then you’re just interested in creating clickbait for your socials and I suggest you sit this one out.

    (The speaker agreed to take a blue-card question)

     
       




     

      Lukas Sieper (NI). – Madam President, the people of Europe, the title of this debate is, in my humble opinion, all wrong. As many colleagues have pointed out, the problem that we are facing is not a Swedish one – it is European, with a strong worldwide aspect to it.

    Just last week, the Ambassador of Ecuador told us that it’s the Albanian mafia being in control of the cocaine shipping out of the port of Guayaquil in Ecuador. Albanian mafia in Ecuador. Let that sink in for a moment. It is always drug-trafficking gangs that enact the worst violence, and these gangs do not fight about the market of Sweden, of Italy or of Luxembourg – they fight about Europe. And so there can only be a European solution.

    We need to strengthen Europol and let it take over some responsibilities from the national police forces. We need to expand funding for the European Union Drugs Agency, and we need to legalise or criminalise the same drugs in the same countries all over Europe. Only if we start tackling this European issue as such, we will stand a chance.

     
       

     

      Alice Teodorescu Måwe (PPE). – Fru talman! “Låt oss spränga och skjuta, grabbar!” “Vi gör 2025 till historiens bästa med sprängningar!” Det skriver gängkriminella i kanaler där morduppdrag läggs ut på entreprenad till köande barnsoldater. Under 28 januaridagar utsattes Sverige för 32 sprängningar, utöver de 18 skjutningarna som också ägde rum.

    Det som nu sker saknar motstycke i västvärlden, och det liknar närmast ett inbördeskrig som ingjuter skräck och skadar tilliten till staten och mellan människor. Friheten för den skötsamma majoriteten kan bara återerövras genom att den kringskärs för den kriminella minoriteten. EPP-gruppens Stockholmsdeklaration pekar ut vägen: stärk Frontex, Europol och den europeiska åklagarmyndigheten. Skärp penningtvättslagstiftningen och underlätta möjligheten att beslagta kriminellas tillgångar. Begränsa, också preventivt, den fria rörligheten för gängmedlemmar.

    Gängkriminaliteten har inte uppstått i ett vakuum. Den är konsekvensen av politiskt pådrivna samhällsförändringar, oftast från vänster, av värderingskonflikter och kravlös integrationspolitik. Det är politikens uppgift att vid sidan av repressiva åtgärder adressera att varje samhälle behöver en grundläggande uppsättning värderingar, ett etiskt minimum. Dessa grundläggande, icke valbara, värderingar är förutsättningen för att människor ska vilja, och välja att, skapa – i stället för att spränga – det samhälle som de har fått till låns. Den som drivs av andra ambitioner har inget i Sverige att göra.

     
       

     

      Maria Grapini (S&D). – Doamnă președintă, doamnă comisară, stimați colegi, discutăm un lucru trist și nu e prima dată. Vreau să transmit condoleanțe celor care și-au pierdut copiii, nu numai în Suedia. Să ne amintim ce a fost de Crăciun în Germania, ce a fost recent în Bruxelles. Doamnă comisară, cred că trebuie să ne asumăm să spunem adevărul: nu s-a gestionat bine democrația. Democrația nu înseamnă să renunțăm la securitate. Din contră, cred că securitatea trebuie să sporească.

    Atunci, haideți să vedem ce facem, pentru că sunt state care au legiferat, de exemplu, consumul de droguri. Toate au legătură: drogurile, armele. Am reglementat aici regimul armelor. Și? Ce s-a întâmplat? Toată lumea are armă acasă, toată lumea scoate arma și trage în copii, la școală sau pe stradă. Deci, dacă nu ne asumăm să schimbăm regulile – democrația nu înseamnă haos, democrația înseamnă ordine, democrația înseamnă și responsabilități, nu numai drepturi.

    Nu avem curajul să spunem acest lucru, de teamă să nu ne spună cumva cetățenii că, vezi Doamne, nu suntem democratici. Eu așa înțeleg democrația: să sporească securitatea, dreptul omului de a fi singur în casa lui, pe stradă, în orașul lui.

     
       

     

      Pascale Piera (PfE). – Madame la Présidente, une criminalité organisée hors de contrôle, des fusillades, du racket, des activités criminelles en tout genre, partout, sans qu’aucune part du territoire ne soit désormais épargnée. C’est une véritable descente aux enfers pour la Suède, alors que la moyenne européenne des tués par balle est de 1,6 par million d’habitants, elle est de quatre tués en Suède. 363 fusillades en 2023, dix morts en une seule fusillade, il y a six jours.

    Le Premier ministre suédois a le courage de regarder les choses en face. Cette situation est la lourde rançon que paie la Suède à une politique d’ouverture migratoire irresponsable.

    Aujourd’hui, c’est 200 gangs issus de l’immigration qui font la loi, de l’Afrique subsaharienne, des Turcs, des Kurdes, un réseau syrien, partout c’est la loi de la mafia qui s’installe, s’introduisant dans toutes les sphères de la société. Les méthodes de recrutement sont vertigineuses: les garçons de 15 à 20 ans cherchent eux-mêmes des mineurs de 12 à 15 ans, les filles sont séduites avant d’être prostituées. Il est temps de regarder les choses en face.

    Ces vingt dernières années, la Suède a vu la part de sa population non occidentale passer de 2 % à 15 %. Voici le fruit d’une politique migratoire aveugle et pour finir criminelle.

    Le gouvernement suédois se donne dix ans pour gagner la bataille. Et nous, en France ou ailleurs, partout où la criminalité est omniprésente, où en serons-nous dans dix ans?

     
       

     

      Joachim Stanisław Brudziński (ECR). – Szanowni Państwo! Kiedy w 2015 roku Angela Merkel włączała piąty bieg w ramach realizacji tej idiotycznej polityki multi-kulti, ogłaszając Herzlich Willkommen i otwierając szeroko granice europejskie, ówczesny lider opozycji w Polsce, szef mojej partii Jarosław Kaczyński przestrzegał Europę, odwołując się do przykładów właśnie w Sztokholmie, kiedy powiedział o ponad 50 strefach szariatu, do których to stref nie ma wejścia szwedzka policja i szwedzkie prawo, rozległ się krzyk od Sztokholmu, bo interweniował ówczesny ambasador Szwecji w Polsce, przez Strasburg po Brukselę. A nieodrodny uczeń Angeli Merkel, ówczesny szef Rady Europejskiej Donald Tusk straszył tych, którzy nie będą przyjmować nielegalnych imigrantów karami.

    Proszę państwa, dzisiaj wszyscy jesteśmy z ofiarami tych zbrodni, jesteśmy z obywatelami Szwecji. Chcemy, aby nasze dzieci bezpiecznie wracały ze szkół do swoich domów. Ale nie wygramy z tym przestępstwem, jeżeli będziemy nadal sparaliżowani polityczną poprawnością i strachem przed nazywaniem rzeczy po imieniu. Nawet w tym, co powiedziała Pani Komisarz, nie sposób się z nią nie zgodzić, tak, wzmacniajmy prawo. Ale co zrobiliśmy z policją? Pamiętacie obrazki brytyjskich policjantów klękających przed osiłkami, którzy dewastowali ulice Londynu? Zwolniliście szefa Frontexu za to, że wspierał rząd polski przed wpuszczaniem nielegalnych imigrantów do Polski. Hipokryci o was powiedzieć to mało.

     
       

     

      Loránt Vincze (PPE). – Madam President, Commissioner, reality cannot be ignored anymore. From France, all the way up to Sweden, there are more and more terrorist street shootings linked to drug and human trafficking and gang-related assassinations. More and more innocent victims and ruined lives. These are criminal acts, predominantly involving individuals and groups with a migration background.

    How did we get there? We know the answer: the pretence that cultural differences are irrelevant, the illusion of an inclusive society, procedures granting fast track citizenship, the tolerance of illegal migration.

    In reality, tens of thousands of second-generation EU citizens of migrant backgrounds have become socially marginalised and pushed to the periphery. From there, for many of them, it was only a short step towards religious radicalisation or organised crime.

    We do not have years to correct the mistakes of past decades. The safety of citizens in Sweden, in Belgium, in France must be ensured today. Law enforcement must be strengthened both in numbers and weaponry. Investigative procedures must be accelerated. Criminal gangs must be dismantled. Migrants in irregular situations must be returned, and the EU can and shall assist through coordination.

    (The speaker agreed to take a blue-card question)

     
       


     

      Loránt Vincze (PPE), blue-card answer. – Well, I believe that for the EU it is important to find the right way for coordination, institutional and financial support, for cross-border law enforcement.

    Yes, education is important, but it’s equally important the environment in which those children live. We know, unfortunately, in many western European societies, parallel societies, parallel neighbourhoods grew up. That made it impossible for children to be integrated in those societies and they went on the road of radicalisation and they were reached out by criminal gangs.

    This is something we need to tackle and it will not be easy. National efforts and coordination, both are extremely important.

     
       

     

      Silvia Sardone (PfE). – Signora Presidente, onorevoli colleghi, non avete il coraggio di dire che è l’immigrazione irregolare ad aver causato la diffusione di gang criminali sempre più pericolose in Europa.

    Svezia, Germania, Belgio, Francia, Italia: ci troviamo sempre più reti di delinquenza, che spesso coinvolgono giovanissimi che sono protagonisti di risse, spaccio, vandalismi e persino omicidi e attentati.

    Questa criminalità è figlia di anni di buonismo, di accoglienza indiscriminata, di finta integrazione, di porte aperte. Sono i danni collaterali delle politiche della sinistra, che ancora nega l’evidente correlazione tra immigrazione irregolare e criminalità. Periferie che diventano ghetti di degrado e insicurezza, territori che perdiamo e dove la polizia fa fatica ad entrare, zone in cui le leggi e le regole non esistono più.

    Quando capirete che chi spinge per più immigrazione mette a rischio la sicurezza dei cittadini europei?

    (L’oratrice accetta di rispondere a una domanda “cartellino blu”)

     
       

     

      Lukas Sieper (NI), Frage nach dem Verfahren der „blauen Karte“. – Illegale Migration führt zu Kriminalität. Man muss nicht mutig sein, um das zu sagen. Das bestreitet ja auch keiner. Aber glauben Sie nicht, dass, wenn man Menschen mit Migrationshintergrund, wenn man Geflüchtete nicht ghettoisiert hätte, in die Armut gedrängt hätte, in schlechte Stadtviertel gedrängt hätte, wenn man ihnen eine Arbeitserlaubnis gegeben hätte, wenn man sie als gleichwertige Mitglieder unserer Gesellschaft behandelt hätte, glauben Sie nicht, dass es dann weniger Kriminalität aus diesem Teil der Bevölkerung geben würde?

     
       

     

      Silvia Sardone (PfE), risposta a una domanda “cartellino blu”. – Guardi, io le dico quello che succede nel mio paese. Nel mio paese, chi arriva, chiunque arrivi come immigrato in regola, ha tutti i diritti che hanno i cittadini italiani. Quindi, non c’è una spinta da parte dello Stato a portare questa gente alla delinquenza.

    Però le faccio una domanda: se fosse vero quello che dice Lei, e quindi se avesse ragione la sinistra, perché in in Svezia, che è lo Stato del quale stiamo parlando, ha vinto il centro-destra, di fatto certificando il fallimento di anni di sinistra? Probabilmente perché i comunisti hanno sbagliato anche stavolta.

     
       

     

      Sebastian Tynkkynen (ECR). – Arvoisa puhemies, Ruotsi on ollut maa, jota monet katsoivat ihailevin silmin. Sittemmin tämä onnellinen ja vauras kansankoti on menty turmelemaan sellaiseksi, ettei sitä enää tunnista entisekseen. Täysin rajoittamattoman muuttoliikkeen on annettu pyyhkäistä Ruotsin yli hyökyaallon lailla. Se on turmellut naapurustoja no go -alueeksi, tehnyt katuja turvattomiksi sekä aikaansaanut räjähdysten ja ammuskelujen värittämän jengirikollisuusepidemian, joka ei Ruotsin hallituksen mukaan ole enää edes hallinnassa. Kuvitelkaa missä kaaoksessa maan pitää olla, että pääministeri joutuu toteamaan näin: “Tilanne ei ole enää hallinnassa”. Mutta alkavat ne silmät avautua nyt Ruotsissakin. Nimittäin, pääministerin mukaan, tiukennetun maahanmuuttopolitiikan linjan täytyy jatkua, jotta Ruotsi voi selviytyä. Siinäpä on ohje koko Euroopalle. Älkäämme toistako Ruotsin hirveää ihmiskoetta, vaan tiukentakaamme maahanmuuttolinjaa, jotta Eurooppa voi selviytyä.

     
       




     

      Verena Mertens (PPE). – Frau Präsidentin! Liebe Kolleginnen und Kollegen! Die massive Bandengewalt, die wir seit einigen Jahren in Schweden erleben, ist alarmierend. Auch in anderen EU-Staaten nimmt die Waffengewalt zu, wie auch jüngst die Schüsse in Brüssel gezeigt haben.

    Diese Herausforderungen können wir nur europäisch lösen, denn organisierte Kriminalität macht nicht an Grenzen halt. Die Täter profitieren von der Freizügigkeit, weil unsere Strafverfolgungsbehörden an Grenzen und Nationalstaaten gebunden sind. Deshalb müssen wir die Strafverfolgungsbehörden in Europa besser vernetzen – untereinander, und mit Europol und Eurojust und der Europäischen Staatsanwaltschaft, die mehr Kompetenzen braucht.

    Die guten Projekte, die es schon gibt, müssen mehr werden, und viel größer. Denn nur mit Nadelstichen können wir nicht gegen die großen Krebsgeschwüre ankommen, die unser Europa krank machen. Die Strafverfolgungsbehörden müssen effizienter und endlich schlagkräftiger bei Ermittlungen werden, aber auch in der Justiz. Ein digitaler Durchsuchungsbeschluss ist essenziell, um die Drahtzieher zu fassen und Netzwerke zu zerschlagen. Wir brauchen mehr Zugang zu digitalen Daten, um die Hintermänner überführen zu können. In der Justiz brauchen wir effizientere Strafprozesse europaweit. Hier können wir die best practice voneinander lernen.

    Europa muss handlungsfähig bleiben. Unsere Freiheit darf nicht zur Schwäche werden. Sie muss unsere Stärke sein.

     
       

     

      France Jamet (PfE). – Madame la Présidente, la guerre des gangs qui ensanglante la Suède semble émouvoir aujourd’hui l’Union européenne. Ce qui surprend la classe politique, en fait, c’est que la Suède est un pays prospère, avec l’un des taux de criminalité les plus bas du monde. Mais c’est l’angélisme des Suédois qui les a conduits à une politique migratoire complètement folle, qui a fait exploser la criminalité organisée.

    Alors, on pourrait considérer ça comme un avertissement, comme à Bruxelles, à Dijon, à Berlin, en Italie, à Marseille, en Seine-Saint-Denis, à Montpellier: la liste est longue. Le temps de réaction aussi, d’ailleurs.

    Parce que, face à cela, nos gouvernants, sous la férule de l’Union européenne, ont pris le parti des criminels et des délinquants. Sclérosés par le politiquement correct, pétrifiés face aux juridictions européennes, ils ont pris le parti de regarder ailleurs. C’est le dévoiement de l’État de droit par l’Union européenne qui a sapé notre souveraineté dans nos territoires, nos prétoires, nos frontières, nos prisons, notre quotidien. Ce sont les dealers et les caïds qui imposent aujourd’hui leurs lois à coups de kalachnikov dans nos rues et jusque devant nos écoles.

    Alors oui, il est temps d’y mettre fin. Il est temps de défendre enfin la sécurité de nos compatriotes et leurs intérêts, avant ceux des criminels, des clandestins, en commençant par soutenir nos forces de police.

     
       

     

      Małgorzata Gosiewska (ECR). – Pani Przewodnicząca! Strzelaniny, zamachy, gwałty, gangi terroryzujące mieszkańców to codzienność Szwecji – jeszcze tak niedawno bezpiecznego kraju. To skutek polityki otwartych drzwi, którą przez lata prowadzili lewicowi politycy. Wszystkim, którzy sprzeciwiali się ówczesnej polityce imigracyjnej Unii Europejskiej, w tym mojemu ugrupowaniu, zarzucano ksenofobię. Przez osiem lat rządów Prawa i Sprawiedliwości skutecznie broniliśmy Polskę przed napływem uchodźców, w tym także tych ze wschodu ściąganych przez Łukaszenkę. Wtedy to obecny premier Donald Tusk, wasz pupil, straszył Polaków karami za nieprzyjęcie migrantów, a jego partyjni koledzy atakowali polską straż graniczną. To wszystko, aby uzyskać wasze wsparcie w wyborach, za które płaci teraz bezpieczeństwem Polski.

    Dziś biurokracja europejska przymusza mój kraj do przyjęcia migrantów. Tusk udaje, że nie ma na to jego zgody, ale wszyscy wiemy, że to zwyczajne oszustwo na potrzeby kampanii prezydenckiej. Wkrótce Polacy, podobnie jak Szwedzi, Niemcy, Francuzi, zaczną mierzyć się ze skutkami waszych szkodliwych decyzji. Chcecie rządzić światem, a ciągniecie Europę na dno.

     
       

     

      Lukas Mandl (PPE). – Frau Präsidentin! Liebe Kolleginnen und Kollegen! In Schweden gibt es eine Explosion der Bandenkriminalität unvorstellbaren Ausmaßes. Ich danke ausdrücklich Tomas Tobé und den anderen schwedischen Kolleginnen und Kollegen dafür, dass sie das auf die Tagesordnung des Europäischen Parlaments bringen.

    Schweden ist exakt gleich lang Mitgliedstaat der Europäischen Union, wie mein Heimatland Österreich das ist. Wir wissen in diesen 30 Jahren: Grenzüberschreitende Herausforderungen können wir nur gemeinsam europäisch lösen. Deshalb ist dieses Parlament der richtige Ort, an dem das diskutiert gehört. Das ist der europäische Familientisch, an dem das diskutiert, bearbeitet und selbstverständlich auch gelöst gehört.

    Ich möchte drei Kerben einschlagen für die Lösung. Erstens, den Problemen ins Auge zu sehen. Auch in dieser parlamentarischen Debatte haben wir die einen gehört, die die Bandenkriminalität ausschließlich auf die Migration zurückführen. Und wir haben die anderen gehört, die ausdrücklich gesagt haben, das hat mit Migration nichts zu tun. Selbstverständlich ist beides falsch. Mit illegaler Migration hat die Bandenkriminalität zu tun, und die Sanktion ist wichtig. Die über die Grenzen hinausgehende Zusammenarbeit der Polizei- und Strafverfolgungsbehörden ist wichtig.

    Aber nicht nur die Sanktion ist wichtig, auch die Prävention ist wichtig. Hier geht es um Werte, um zivilisatorische Werte, um Menschenwürde und Freiheitsrechte. Darum, dass jeder Mensch gleich viel wert ist und dass es nicht nur die Freiheit von einem Zwang gibt, sondern auch die Freiheit, um etwas zu tun und zu unternehmen im Leben.

    Zur Freiheit gehört auch die Verantwortung. Und das ist es, was sowohl Migrantinnen und Migranten als auch Ansässigen vermittelt werden muss.

     
       

     

      Nikola Bartůšek (PfE). – Paní předsedající, dámy a pánové, jedna bomba denně. Ano, tak taková je bilance útoků ve Švédsku za poslední měsíc. Převaděči, drogové gangy, organizovaný zločin zaplavili švédská města. Švédsko bývalo kdysi symbolem evropské prosperity. Idylická, bezpečná země s nízkou kriminalitou, proslulá svou spravedlivou politikou a rovností. To už ale neplatí. Švédsko se stalo obětí vlastní naivity a má druhou nejvyšší míru úmrtí způsobených střelnými zbraněmi.

    Toto je obrovské varování před tím, abychom zaplavili pracovní trh levnou pracovní silou, rádoby v dobré víře, a přitom to nazývali humanitární pomocí. S touto masovou levnou pracovní silou přichází k nám domů kriminalita a terorismus. Místo toho, aby Švédsko zůstalo nejbezpečnější zemí v Evropě, zažívá nejvíce teroristických útoků. Vždyť ani nevíme, kdo se nám po Evropě pohybuje. Je čas čelit pravdě. Tento experiment založený na masové migraci selhal. Buďme chytří a poučme se z chyb, než bude příliš pozdě. Společně musíme přestat zavírat oči, zavést přísnější tresty za násilné trestné činy, tvrdší opatření proti praní špinavých peněz a tvrdý zásah proti drogovým gangům. Vždy jde o bezpečnost našich občanů.

     
       


       

    PRESIDE: JAVI LÓPEZ
    Vicepresidente

     
       

     

      Tomislav Sokol (PPE). – Poštovani predsjedavajući, Švedska, nekada poznata po svojoj sigurnosti, posljednjih godina suočava se s alarmantnim porastom nasilja i kriminala. Eksplozije, pucnjave i ubojstva postale su uobičajena pojava na ulicama Stockholma, Göteborga i Malmöa. Posebno zabrinjava porast broja mladih koji su počinitelji teških kaznenih djela. Broj počinitelja teških kaznenih djela sa smrtnim ishodom u dobnoj skupini od 15 do 20 godina gotovo se učetverostručio od 2014. E, sada, što se promijenilo u švedskom društvu unutar zadnjih deset godina, a što bi moglo biti uzrok ovakvog stanja? Možda, samo možda, sve skupa ima veze s velikim porastom imigracije u istom razdoblju. Hoćemo li zbog političke korektnosti izbjegavati raspravu o pravim problemima i nastaviti živjeti u oblacima? Kolegice i kolege, potreban je žestok odgovor na povećano nasilje koji mora uključivati zaustavljanje masovne imigracije, uvođenje strožih kazni za počinitelje kaznenih djela, jačanje policijskih ovlasti, ali i deportaciju ilegalnih migranata bez milosti. Trenutna švedska vlada djeluje u pravom smjeru, a mi trebamo postupati mnogo oštrije prema imigraciji i na razini EU-a. Dame i gospodo, ovo je pitanje opstanka Europe.

     
       

       

    Solicitudes incidentales de uso de la palabra («catch the eye»)

     
       

     

      Dariusz Joński (PPE). – Panie Przewodniczący! Tematem debaty jest sytuacja w Szwecji, tymczasem politycy partii Kaczyńskiego z Polski wpadli na pomysł, aby po raz kolejny kłamać na tej sali. Dlaczego to robią? Bo w Polsce są wybory i myślą, że po raz kolejny mogą bezkarnie tutaj kłamać. Otóż tak na dobrą sprawę, jeśli ktokolwiek odpowiada za handlowanie bezpieczeństwem w Polsce, to byli politycy właśnie partii Kaczyńskiego. Jeden z ministrów spraw zagranicznych, który odpowiadał za politykę wizową, został złapany przez Centralne Biuro Antykorupcyjne. W tej sprawie jest komisja śledcza w polskim Sejmie i działa prokuratura, bo ktoś handlował wizami. Można było kupić tanio wizę między innymi z krajów afrykańskich, azjatyckich.

    Otóż to trzeba głośno mówić, bo mam dość tych kłamstw polityków partii Kaczyńskiego. I żeby przeciąć jakiekolwiek spekulacje. Donald Tusk razem z Urszulą von der Leyen w zeszłym tygodniu powiedzieli, że Polska nie będzie implementować paktu migracyjnego. Koniec, kropka. I wszyscy w Polsce i nie tylko w Polsce wiedzą dlaczego? Przyjęliśmy 2 miliony uchodźców z Ukrainy. Pomagamy jak mało kto. I dlatego Polska nie będzie implementować paktu migracyjnego.

     
       



     

      Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă (NI). – Domnule președinte, v-am auzit aici dând vina de la stânga la dreapta și de la dreapta la stânga. Cu tot respectul, au murit niște oameni, mor copii, mor tineri. Cred că singurul lucru care ne lipsește în toată Europa aceasta, ca și în întreaga lume, este educația, educația care lasă de dorit! Și cred că ar trebui să ascultați psihologii care nu sunt plătiți de dumneavoastră să vă spună cum copiii au nevoie de autoritate, au nevoie de reguli, au nevoie să fie și pedepsiți. Nu omorâți în bătaie, dar pedepsiți, cum am fost și noi. Au nevoie să li se traseze niște reguli, pentru că devin niște abuzatori când cresc.

    Aveți arme la liber? Da, migrația este foarte gravă, e o problemă gravă! V-ați gândit câte arme vin din Ucraina? Știți că prin Portul Constanța vin cele mai multe cantități de droguri, de când ați permis ucrainenilor să vină în Europa? Este raportul Organizației Națiunilor Unite, nu al meu! Cred că ar trebui să vă treziți și să începeți să schimbați învățământul, să opriți inclusiv ucrainenii să mai plece din Ucraina, să opriți finanțarea războiului și să încetați cu Interpolul și cu forțele de violență.

     
       

       

    (Fin de las intervenciones con arreglo al procedimiento de solicitud incidental de uso de la palabra («catch the eye»))

     
       

     

      Maria Luís Albuquerque, Member of the Commission. – Mr President, honourable Members, having listened to this debate, I think we all agree that we need to do a lot and fast. That is why, next month, the Commission will propose a comprehensive internal security strategy. It will be a strategic blueprint for the Commission’s security priorities. This long‑term planning will shape our approach to research, innovation, procurement and operational deployment, improving our joint fight against organised crime and drug trafficking. We will put all our energy into ensuring a stronger, more effective and better coordinated EU‑wide response to organised crime.

    We must put an end to this escalating threat and restore the control over our communities and our borders to protect the safety of citizens in Sweden and across the EU.

     
       

     

      El presidente. – Se cierra el debate.

     

    15. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights: the need for the European Union to contribute to resolving the humanitarian crisis of persons missing in wars and conflicts (debate)


     

      Lukas Mandl, on behalf of the PPE Group. – Mr President, when a person goes missing and remains missing, not only is this person affected in one way or another, but many people around; friends and family, parents and children would be affected by that. It is a pity that we have to say today the absolute rule to avoid persons going missing also in armed conflict is not respected anymore. There are more and more missing persons. Particularly Ukraine is suffering; Ukrainian children, men and women are suffering. Especially, as we all know, children from Ukraine in a large number would be brought to Russia and maybe other places. We don’t know about their whereabouts. They go missing.

    The International Red Cross documents that more and more persons go missing. This is why, in the European Parliament, we time and again have to underline and emphasise the importance of human rights, of humanitarian law, and among humanitarian law rules, avoiding persons going missing is a major rule.

    Of course, also the migration routes which are caused by human trafficking, by smugglers, by organised crime, are places where persons go missing: 60 000 and more in Ukraine, 40 000 were documented by the Red Cross, nearly 30 000 only in the last years in the Mediterranean when it’s about illegal migration routes. There are also regimes on this planet who purposely use persons going missing against their own population. This is something that happens in North Korea. This is something that happens in the Iranian mullah regime. And this is something that’s also used against Europe when it comes to illegal migration, many times purposely. This is why it is so important to emphasise this issue and to bring it to the table of this very European Parliament.

     
       

     

      Costas Mavrides, on behalf of the S&D Group. – Mr President, in 2001, the European Court of Human Rights found Turkey guilty for a continued violation of a number of conventions and articles, specifically with regard to the whereabouts and faith of Greek Cypriot missing persons during the Turkish invasion of 1974. Since then, as the European Parliament, we condemn Turkey for its actions, specifically for the intentional removal of human remains in its efforts to cover up its regional crimes committed by the Turkish Army under state orders. Despite court decisions, Turkey refuses still today to provide crucial information, such as access to military archives and access to so-called military zones. This behaviour is simply an extension of the original crime 50 years ago, and this country remains in the accession process.

     
       

     

      Γεάδης Γεάδη, εξ ονόματος της ομάδας ECR. – Κύριε Πρόεδρε, άρθρο 3 της Οικουμενικής Διακήρυξης Ανθρωπίνων Δικαιωμάτων: «Κάθε άνθρωπος έχει δικαίωμα στη ζωή, στην ελευθερία και την προσωπική του ασφάλεια». Δυστυχώς όμως, η φρικαλεότητα του πολέμου δεν κάνει διακρίσεις. Χιλιάδες αγνοούμενοι μετά τη ρωσική εισβολή στην Ουκρανία, εκατοντάδες αγνοούμενοι και μετά την τρομοκρατική επίθεση της Χαμάς στο Ισραήλ.

    Στον μαύρο κατάλογο και η Κύπρος, που εδώ και 50 χρόνια βιώνει τις συνέπειες της τουρκικής εισβολής και της συνεχιζόμενης παράνομης κατοχής. Η τουρκική βαρβαρότητα άφησε πίσω της 1.619 αγνοούμενους σε ένα μικρό νησί όπως η Κύπρος. Άμαχοι, γυναίκες, γέροντες και μικρά παιδιά συμπεριλαμβάνονται στον μακρύ αυτόν κατάλογο των απαχθέντων.

    Η Τουρκία δεν συνεργάζεται. Κωφεύει στις διεθνείς εκκλήσεις, περιφρονεί την απόφαση του Ευρωπαϊκού Δικαστηρίου, αγνοεί το ψήφισμα 34/50 των Ηνωμένων Εθνών και αντ’ αυτού οργανωμένα μετακινεί οστά από τους ομαδικούς τάφους. Και γιατί να το πράξει άλλωστε, όταν υψηλόβαθμοι αξιωματούχοι της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης, αντί να τη θέσουν ενώπιον των ευθυνών της με αυστηρότατες κυρώσεις, την χρηματοδοτούν αποκαλώντας της στρατηγικό εταίρο;

    Έχουμε χρέος απέναντι στις τραγικές φιγούρες, τις μάνες των αγνοουμένων που έφυγαν χωρίς να ξέρουν την τύχη του δικού τους ανθρώπου. Μόνο τότε θα μπορούμε να κοιτάζουμε στα μάτια τα τότε κοριτσάκια που σήμερα έγιναν μητέρες, γιαγιάδες και ακόμα ψάχνουν τι απέγινε ο δικός τους πατέρας.

     
       


     

      Mounir Satouri, au nom du groupe Verts/ALE. – Monsieur le Président, chers collègues, derrière chaque disparition, il y a des familles et des communautés qui souffrent de l’incertitude quant au sort de leurs proches. Cependant, selon l’endroit où cela se passe dans le monde, le problème peut devenir secondaire pour la communauté internationale.

    Ces disparitions sont pourtant monnaie courante dans tous les conflits: c’est le cas des enfants ukrainiens arrachés à leur famille par le régime russe. C’est le cas des otages israéliens capturés par le Hamas. Mais c’est aussi le cas des milliers de civils palestiniens tués anonymement ou emprisonnés dans le secret. C’est le cas des familles séparées par la guerre ou des enfants enrôlés de force en RDC ou au Soudan. C’est le cas des fosses communes retrouvées en Ukraine, à Gaza, en RDC ou en Syrie.

    Notre indignation ne doit pas être sélective. Toutes ces horreurs sont proscrites par le droit international humanitaire. Les belligérants sont obligés d’empêcher les disparitions et de fournir des informations sur la mort ou la détention des personnes. Pourtant, c’est l’impunité qui règne et les familles des disparus continuent d’être dévastées.

    Peut-on espérer la paix si nous ne garantissons pas l’application du droit international par la justice?

    J’appelle donc à protéger les outils de justice internationale, au premier rang desquels la Cour pénale internationale, qui enquête en RDC comme au Soudan, qui a engagé des poursuites contre Vladimir Poutine, contre Benyamin Netanyahou ou les cadres du Hamas pour leurs crimes contre l’humanité. Les familles des disparus ont droit à la justice. C’est le seul chemin viable vers la paix.

     
       

     

      Γιώργος Γεωργίου, εξ ονόματος της ομάδας The Left. – Κύριε Πρόεδρε, μου κάνει εντύπωση που κάποιοι βλέπουν αγνοούμενους μόνο στην Ουκρανία. Και για την Γάζα πάλι μιλάνε, αλλά δεν μας λένε ότι εκεί στη Γάζα οι αγνοούμενοι είναι μόνον οι Παλαιστίνιοι. Ούτε μας λένε για τους δεκάδες χιλιάδες αγνοούμενους που προέκυψαν από τα φασιστικά δικτατορικά καθεστώτα στην Ευρώπη.

    Είναι βέβαια και οι αγνοούμενοι στην Κύπρο. Δυστυχώς, για πολλές δεκαετίες το ζήτημα των αγνοουμένων της Κύπρου, ίσως η πιο τραγική πτυχή αυτού του προβλήματος, συνεχίζεται. Ο κατάλογος βέβαια είναι εμπλουτισμένος από Ελληνοκύπριους και Τουρκοκύπριους αγνοούμενους και ο πόνος για τις μανάδες, τα αδέλφια, τους συγγενείς είναι κοινός.

    Στηρίζεται βέβαια η Διερευνητική Επιτροπή των Αγνοουμένων από την Ευρωπαϊκή Ένωση, όμως αυτή η στήριξη δεν είναι αρκετή, διότι η Τουρκία συνεχίζει να προβάλλει εμπόδια, να δυσκολεύει και να παραπληροφορεί. Έτσι, οι ευθύνες της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης και της διεθνούς κοινότητας είναι σήμερα ακόμα πιο σημαντική προς την κατεύθυνση να πιεστεί η Τουρκία, να αναγκαστεί να ανοίξει τα στρατιωτικά της αρχεία, να δώσει πληροφορίες και στοιχεία για τους αγνοούμενους.

    Αναφέρομαι χαρακτηριστικά στην περίπτωση των αγνοουμένων της Άσσιας, του χωριού μου. Εκεί, ο τουρκικός στρατός εκτέλεσε εν ψυχρώ 70 ανθρώπους και τους έριξε σε ένα πηγάδι. Το ’96 τους μετακίνησαν σε ένα σκυβαλότοπο στο Δίκωμο. Εκεί βρίσκεται και ένας θείος μου, ο θείος μου Κλεάνθης. Θέλουμε πίσω τα οστά τους, να τους θάψουμε όπως αρμόζει στους νεκρούς. Δεν ζητάμε πολλά. Θέλουμε να δράσουμε τώρα. Το οφείλουμε στη μνήμη των θυμάτων. Το οφείλουμε στις οικογένειές τους που πρέπει να μάθουν την αλήθεια.

     
       

     

      Željana Zovko (PPE). – Poštovani predsjedavajući, govorit ću danas o univerzalnoj deklaraciji o ljudskim pravima u kontekstu rata, sukoba i geopolitičkih napetosti. Podsjećamo se da je nastala upravo u takvim okolnostima, kao odgovor na nepravdu, patnju i kršenje temeljnih prava.

    Agresija na Republiku Hrvatsku 91. godine donijela je nezamislivu patnju. Tisuće hrvatskih branitelja i civila bili su zatočeni, nestali ili nasilno odvedeni. Unatoč svim naporima i mjerama, i dalje se suočavamo s najtežim posljedicama rata. 1782 osobe i dalje se vode kao nestale. Nažalost, u Bosni i Hercegovini još se uvijek traga za 7608 osoba. Ova pitanja ne smiju ostati otvorena. Pravda za nestale ne može biti prepuštena zaboravu.

    Pozivam Srbiju i Crnu Goru da konačno preuzmu odgovornost, otvore arhive, podijele informacije i omoguće rješavanje sudbina onih koji su nepravedno nestali. Europska unija mora iskoristiti svoju pregovaračku moć i osigurati da se ovo pitanje stavi visoko na dnevni red pretpristupnih pregovora. Pristup Europskoj uniji podrazumijeva vrijednost istine, pravde i ljudskih prava i u tome ne može i ne smije biti kompromisa. Dok obitelji s neizmjernom boli još uvijek tragaju za svojim najmilijima, a njihovi domovi odzvanjaju najglasnijom tišinom, mi imamo odgovornost. Neprihvatljivo je da oni koji imaju informacije o nestalima i dalje šute. Otvorite arhive, bez toga nema zaključavanja pregovora.

     
       


     

      Antonella Sberna (ECR). – Signor Presidente, onorevoli colleghi, oggi, 10 febbraio, in Italia celebriamo il Giorno del ricordo, una giornata dedicata alla memoria delle vittime italiane delle foibe e delle centinaia di migliaia di persone costrette all’esodo dalle terre giuliano-dalmate, una ferita ancora aperta, perché molti di loro restano senza nome e molte famiglie senza una verità.

    Ma il dolore dei dispersi non è solo un ricordo del passato. Ancora oggi, in troppi conflitti, migliaia di persone scompaiono senza lasciare traccia. A Cipro, a cinquant’anni dall’invasione turca, oltre 2 000 persone risultano ancora disperse. Nei Balcani, durante le guerre degli anni ’90, sono molti i casi irrisolti, così come in Ucraina migliaia di bambini sono stati deportati, separati dalle loro famiglie, vittime di un’ingiustizia che segnerà intere generazioni.

    La tecnologia, a questo punto, può essere un alleato prezioso nella ricerca delle persone scomparse. L’uso del telerilevamento satellitare e della tecnologia LiDAR può aiutare a individuare fosse comuni e raccogliere prove fondamentali per identificare le vittime e restituire loro la dignità.

    L’Unione europea deve investire in queste tecnologie, ma oltre alla tecnologia serve la volontà politica. L’Unione europea deve farsi promotrice di meccanismi vincolanti per la ricerca delle persone scomparse, affinché nessun paese possa ostacolare la verità.

    Cari colleghi, il diritto alla verità non ha scadenza. Le famiglie di chi è scomparso continuano a cercare, senza scelta e senza tempo. È nostro dovere stare al loro fianco, trasformando i valori dell’Europa in azioni concrete.

     
       

     

      Hannah Neumann (Verts/ALE). – Mr President, ‘Bring out the dead dogs’. That’s how prison guards ordered inmates to carry out the bodies of those who died overnight in Sednaya Prison in Syria. What happened to those bodies? Nobody knows. For decades, the Assad regime has used forced disappearances as a tool of repression. More than 100 000 people have disappeared under his rule. Over 100 000 remain missing today. Now, for the first time in decades, there is a real chance to uncover the truth. Syrian experts are already on the ground, documenting crimes, exhuming mass graves, protecting evidence. But they need our support, financially and politically, to fund Syrian civil society working for truth, justice and reconciliation, to press Syria’s new rulers to make transitional justice a priority, to strengthen the UN mechanism on missing people, to ensure independent investigations. Because this is the only way to hold perpetrators accountable, to help families find out what happened to their loved ones, and to support Syrians rebuilding a country that heals its wounds and will be a free country for everyone.

     
       


     

      Fidias Panayiotou (NI). – Mr President, my uncle has been missing since the Turkish invasion of my country, Cyprus, in 1974. This had a huge impact on my family. My father was seven years old when he witnessed a suicide attempt by my grandmother because she couldn’t handle it. My uncle is one of the 2 000 Greek Cypriots and Turkish Cypriots who had disappeared, mainly during the Turkish invasion in 1974 and the intercommunal fighting of 1964. The remains of these communities’ people are being searched for by communal committee, and by today half of them have been identified and returned to their relatives, who, unlike my grandmother, were lucky enough to live until that day of relief.

    I want to thank the European Union because it is the biggest funder of this committee, giving so far EUR 35 million. Please continue to fund this project, which not only brings peace to families like mine, but also encourages cooperation between the two communities of the island, increasing the chance of a potential solution to the Cyprus problem.

     
       

     

      Φρέντης Μπελέρης (PPE). – Κύριε Πρόεδρε, η Οικουμενική Διακήρυξη για τα Ανθρώπινα Δικαιώματα ξεκαθαρίζει πως όλοι έχουν το δικαίωμα στην αξιοπρέπεια και τη δικαιοσύνη. Αλλά ποια αξιοπρέπεια, ποια δικαιοσύνη υπάρχει για εκείνους των οποίων η μοίρα παραμένει άγνωστη;

    Θέλω να επικεντρωθώ σε δύο κράτη, την Κύπρο, όπου πενήντα χρόνια μετά την τουρκική εισβολή, χιλιάδες οικογένειες αναζητούν τους οικείους τους, και την Αλβανία, όπου εξακολουθούν να αγνοούνται περίπου 6.000 άνθρωποι που χάθηκαν κατά τη διάρκεια της κομμουνιστικής θηριωδίας. Το ίδιο φαινόμενο έχει παρατηρηθεί και σε άλλες χώρες. Έχουμε λοιπόν την ηθική και πολιτική ευθύνη να βοηθήσουμε στην αποκατάσταση αυτής της αδικίας.

    Το Ευρωπαϊκό Κοινοβούλιο το 2015 έκανε το πρώτο βήμα, εγκρίνοντας ψήφισμα σχετικά με ομαδικούς τάφους αγνοουμένων στο χωριό Ορνίθι, στο κατεχόμενο τμήμα της Κύπρου. Ήρθε η ώρα να το ξανακάνουμε. Γιατί πίσω από κάθε αγνοούμενο υπάρχει μια οικογένεια, μια ιστορία και ατελείωτος πόνος. Πίσω από κάθε αλήθεια που δεν έρχεται στο φως υπάρχουν οι δικές μας ευθύνες.

     
       

     

      Leire Pajín (S&D). – (inicio de la intervención fuera de micrófono) … aquí este debate, pero les invito a que sea un debate sincero, fuera hipocresías.

    Porque la Declaración Universal de Derechos Humanos es una declaración de paz para que todas las personas vivan libres e iguales en dignidad y derechos, y hay grupos en esta Cámara que diferencian las crisis humanitarias y también las víctimas: solo hay que ver lo que dicen o cómo responden a las víctimas de Gaza o de otras crisis; tampoco lo hacen en mi país donde tiempo después, mucho tiempo después de esa declaración, todavía sufríamos una larga dictadura llena de desapariciones y de muertes.

    Señorías, una Europa sin memoria es una Europa que no puede mirar al futuro ni a la convivencia en paz; una Europa sin memoria es aquella donde los jóvenes no saben lo que pasó ni lo que fue la conquista de la libertad. Por eso queremos una Unión Europea que garantice el derecho a la memoria, a la reparación y a la justicia en todo el mundo, también en España, y que impida la derogación de leyes de la memoria que condena a las víctimas a seguir en las cunetas.

    Por eso, dejémonos de hipocresía y luchemos por la memoria y la dignidad de todas las víctimas en el mundo, también en Europa y en España.

     
       

     

      Sebastian Everding (The Left). – Herr Präsident! Liebe Kolleginnen und Kollegen! Wie soll an vielen Stellen auf der Welt ein dauerhafter Frieden vermittelt werden, wenn Familien keine Antwort auf das Schicksal ihrer Angehörigen haben? Dies stellt eines der größten Hindernisse für die Heilung, Versöhnung und den Wiederaufbau von Gesellschaften dar.

    Die Zahlen sind dabei mehr als erschreckend, denn mehr als 71 000 Menschen in Afrika gelten als vermisst und rund 42 000 Menschen in der Ukraine. Dabei sind es wohlgemerkt nicht nur Soldaten, sondern auch viele Zivilisten. Aber wir müssen gar nicht so weit wegschauen, denn auch in Zentraleuropa werden rund 10 000 Menschen vermisst, deren sterbliche Überreste nach dem gewaltsamen Zerfall Jugoslawiens nie gefunden wurden.

    Die internationale Gemeinschaft und auch die EU müssen dringend Schritte ergreifen, um einen wirksamen Weg zur Klärung des Schicksals und Verbleibs vermisster Menschen zu finden. Denn ohne Fortschritte kann es aufgrund der Schmerzen, des Verlustes und der empfundenen Ungerechtigkeit keinen dauerhaften Frieden in vielen Regionen geben.

    Ich schließe mit den Worten von George Bernard Shaw, der sagt: Krieg ist ein Zustand, bei dem Menschen aufeinander schießen, die sich nicht kennen, auf Befehl von Menschen, die sich zwar kennen, aber nicht aufeinander schießen.

     
       


     

      Ana Catarina Mendes (S&D). – Senhor Presidente, caros colegas, acabo de chegar de uma difícil missão a Palestina e a Israel, onde pude testemunhar a destruição, o desespero e as condições precárias nas quais tentam sobreviver milhares de pessoas, das quais muitas crianças. Gaza é uma das regiões com maior densidade populacional no mundo, que enfrenta há anos desafios diários devido às restrições sistémicas e aos recursos limitados. Desde o terrível ataque de 7 de outubro de 2023 que as condições pioraram ainda mais. Todas as guerras e conflitos, e este não é exceção, deixam também as marcas dos desaparecidos. As mães da Praça de Maio, na Argentina, as Mães de Sábado, na Turquia, livros e filmes como o recente Ainda Estou Aqui, sobre Rubens Paiva, no Brasil, mostram a desumanidade dos desaparecimentos e a apneia da procura de respostas em que os seus familiares mergulham durante décadas. Juntemos a isto a Síria, Chipre, a Ucrânia. Nos dias de hoje, a Declaração Universal dos Direitos Humanos pretende garantir que os seus apelos por verdade, justiça e pela não repetição da história sejam ouvidos. Lutemos pela memória para continuarmos a viver em liberdade, com respeito pelos direitos humanos.

    (A oradora aceita responder a uma pergunta «cartão azul»)

     
       



     

      François-Xavier Bellamy (PPE). – Monsieur le Président, Madame la Commissaire, 50 ans après l’invasion de Chypre par la Turquie, des centaines de Chypriotes sont encore aujourd’hui formellement portés disparus. Leurs familles n’ont pas seulement perdu ceux qu’elles aimaient, elles ont été privées de la vérité et, sans cette vérité, elles ne peuvent pas faire leur deuil. Ce n’est pas une abstraction. Notre collègue Fidias Panayiotou vient de nous donner un exemple très concret de ce que peuvent signifier dans une vie, dans la vie d’une famille, ces personnes qui manquent à l’appel.

    Chers collègues, je parlais moi-même avec un ami chypriote, il y a quelques semaines de cela, qui me disait: «Bien sûr, la guerre a été terrible, mais plus terrible encore, peut-être, aura été, après la guerre, d’être privés de savoir où sont ceux que nous avons perdus.»

    Aujourd’hui, nous avons un devoir, tous ensemble, et comme rapporteur de ce Parlement pour cette mission qui nous réunit, je veux travailler avec toutes les forces politiques de cet hémicycle, parce que si une question doit dépasser les clivages, c’est bien celle-là.

    Notre devoir, c’est de faire en sorte qu’enfin la Turquie coopère et qu’elle dise la vérité. Que nous puissions savoir enfin offrir à ces familles endeuillées la vérité à laquelle elles ont droit, parce que le temps passe et le temps court et, ce temps qui court, c’est celui des générations qui vont bientôt nous quitter et qui ont le droit de connaître le sort de ceux qu’elles ont aimés avant de partir.

    Cette urgence absolue, la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme l’a rappelée à de très nombreuses reprises. C’est à notre Parlement aujourd’hui de faire en sorte que la Turquie puisse enfin rentrer dans cette coopération dont nous avons tellement besoin, parce que la justice en dépend, la vérité en dépend, ainsi que le salut de ces familles dont nous parlons, qui est la cause qui nous réunit.

     
       

     

      Murielle Laurent (S&D). – Monsieur le Président, Madame la Commissaire, chers collègues, en 2024, le Comité international de la Croix-Rouge a annoncé que, pour le seul continent africain, plus de 71 000 personnes étaient portées disparues en raison des conflits armés, de la violence et du contexte migratoire, soit 75 % de plus qu’en 2019.

    Ces disparitions sont l’une des conséquences humanitaires les plus désastreuses et durables des conflits. Souvenons-nous que, derrière chaque personne disparue, beaucoup d’autres souffrent de l’incertitude et c’est inconcevable. Si cela avait lieu en Europe, il serait inimaginable de ne pas chercher les disparus, et en particulier les enfants.

    Il est urgent de parler de ces personnes, de reconnaître la souffrance, le désespoir des familles et d’attirer l’attention de l’Union européenne, de prévenir et de résoudre les disparitions des personnes, quelles que soient les circonstances.

    Enfin, je souhaite rappeler que de nombreux migrants disparaissent au cours de leur déplacement, trop souvent périlleux, vers l’Europe, ou une fois arrivés.

    Il est essentiel que l’Union européenne évalue l’impact de ses politiques migratoires sur le risque de disparition des migrants et facilite les opérations de secours en mer afin d’éviter les tragédies, qui font trop souvent la une de nos journaux.

     
       



     

      Maria Guzenina (S&D). – Mr President, right now, as we speak, thousands of Ukrainian children have been ripped from their homes, torn from the arms of their families, forcefully deported to Russia and Belarus, detained in Russian prisons, forced into adoption, stripped of their identities. These children are being erased. A grave violation of international law.

    Even in this room, I have heard Russian propaganda attempting to twist this horror into something it is not. Let me say this plainly: this is not a topic for propaganda. This is a moral line that demands the united will of the entire European Parliament. We must act. We must act now. The EU must impose sanctions against those responsible for these atrocities. And more than that, we must demand that these children, these stolen lives, are returned to their homes, to their families, to their loved ones. These children are not just numbers in a report; they are lives stolen. And we cannot, we must not let them be forgotten. So bring them home.

     
       

       

    Solicitudes incidentales de uso de la palabra («catch the eye»)

     
       


     

      Sebastian Tynkkynen (ECR). – Arvoisa puhemies, kun terroristijärjestö Hamas otti viattomia israelilaissiviilejä panttivangiksi, omaisten tuskan voi vain kuvitella. Ajattele, jos joutuisit itse miettimään taukoamatta, tuleeko itselle rakas ihminen koskaan takaisin, ja jos tulee, millaisia kauheuksia kokeneena. Samaa joutuvat miettimään lukuisat ja lukuisat perheet parhaillaan Ukrainassa. Käveleekö oma poikani enää koskaan tuosta kotiovesta? Jos ei kävele, millaiset mahtavat olla hänen viimeiset hetkensä?

    Kun me vahvistamme Euroopan turvallisuutta, oli kyse sitten puolustuksen ylösajosta tai terrorismin kitkemisestä, kyse ei ole vain poliittisista päätöksistä. Kyse on eurooppalaisten perheiden suojelusta. Kun Euroopalta tällaisten uhkakuvien edessä vaaditaan kovaa linjaa, vasemmisto yhä edelleen vastustaa. En voi käsittää, ja siksi kysyn, mikä teidän arvoissanne on oikein vialla?

     
       



     

      Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă (NI). – Domnule președinte, vorbiți de drepturile omului și sunteți instituția care le încalcă cel mai mult. Începând cu plandemia, ați distrus tot ceea ce înseamnă drepturile omului. Vorbiți de Israel, le luați apărarea, dar nu vedeți că au murit peste 45 000 de femei și copii.

    Vorbiți de Ucraina, dar de ce nu vorbiți, vă rog, de românii din Ucraina, peste un milion care sunt supuși exterminării de Zelensky, pe care dumneavoastră îl luați în brațe? Nu vedeți nici măcar că Ursula von der Leyen l-a sprijinit pe Președintele României, domnul Klaus Werner Iohannis, care are dosare pentru vânzare de copii.

    Vă anunț că astăzi, domnul Klaus Werner Iohannis, la presiunea politică, inclusiv a partidului meu, pe care îl conduc, S.O.S. România, și-a dat demisia. Ați încălcat dumneavoastră și ați permis încălcarea drepturilor omului, ați omorât oameni în pandemie, omorâți oameni, trimițând arme în Ucraina și vă bateți joc de tot ceea ce înseamnă, din Fâșia Gaza, palestinienii. Nu așa se face politică! Cu tot respectul, învățați să (…)

    (Președintele a retras cuvântul vorbitoarei)

     
       

     

      Γεώργιος Αυτιάς (PPE). – Κύριε Πρόεδρε, πρέπει να κινηθούμε αποφασιστικά, με μέτρα κοινωνικά, γιατί χωρίς τον άνθρωπο, οι κοινωνίες δεν μπορούν να προχωρήσουν. Μισθοί, συντάξεις, ασφαλιστικό, ακρίβεια, στέγαση. Όλα αυτά, λοιπόν, απαιτούν από εμάς άμεση δράση, άμεση κινητοποίηση. Καμία κοινωνία δεν μπορεί να στηριχθεί, αν δεν έχει τον άνθρωπο μπροστά σε όλες τις δραστηριότητες.

    Παράλληλα, θα πρέπει να στηρίξουμε τους ανθρώπους οι οποίοι απειλούνται από την τεχνητή νοημοσύνη. Είναι οι συγγραφείς, είναι οι δημιουργοί, είναι οι καλλιτέχνες. Ζουν μια ανηλεή αντιγραφή στα έργα τους. Άπειρη προσοχή, λοιπόν, να κινηθούμε προς αυτή την κατεύθυνση. Να στηρίξουμε ανθρώπους, να στηρίξουμε τη γνώση, γιατί η κοινωνία δεν μπορεί να περιμένει άλλο.

     
       

     

      Carola Rackete (The Left). – Herr Präsident! Ich muss sagen, diese Debatte erfüllt mich auch mit wahnsinnig viel Wut, denn es gibt Tausende von Opfern, deren Überreste auf dem Boden des Mittelmeers liegen. Menschen auf der Flucht, die von der EU sterben gelassen wurden und die niemand gerettet hat, als sie noch gelebt haben.

    Diese Krise ist das Resultat der Abschottungspolitik, die in diesen Sälen entschieden wird. Eine Schande! Ich selber habe, als ich auf dem Schiff gearbeitet habe, doch wirklich so häufig der Küstenwache die Leichen gemeldet, und nie haben sie eigentlich Lust, die Leichen aufzunehmen, die DNA zu nehmen, die Leute zu identifizieren oder einfach die Leichen dann ordentlich zu beerdigen.

    Es gibt Tausende und Abertausende von Familien in Afrika, die ihre Verwandten suchen. Diese Leute hätten alle – alle – lebend gerettet werden können, wenn die EU sich zu einer vernünftigen Seenotrettungsmission, staatlich finanziert, entscheiden würde.

    Bedanken möchte ich mich hier wirklich und sehr ernsthaft bei den Hunderten und Tausenden von Freiwilligen des Roten Halbmonds in Tunesien und Libyen, die sich um die Leichen kümmern, die dort angeschwemmt werden.

     
       

     

      Κώστας Παπαδάκης (NI). – Κύριε Πρόεδρε, μόνο στην Ουκρανία βλέπετε αγνοούμενους. Για τους χιλιάδες Παλαιστινίους στη Γάζα ούτε κουβέντα. Πενήντα ένα χρόνια, όμως, μετά από την τουρκική εισβολή και κατοχή στην Κύπρο, που και αυτή οδήγησε σε χιλιάδες νεκρούς, αγνοούμενους και εκτοπισμένους.

    Είναι απαράδεκτο μετά από τόσα χρόνια οικογένειες αγνοουμένων με τους συλλόγους τους σε Κύπρο και Ελλάδα να επωμίζονται το βάρος, όχι μόνο της απουσίας και απώλειας των ανθρώπων τους, αλλά να αναλαμβάνουν ευθύνες που βαρύνουν κράτη και κυβερνήσεις για τη συγκέντρωση στοιχείων, τη διακρίβωση της τύχης των αγνοουμένων πολιτών και στρατιωτών, παράλληλα με τη Διερευνητική Επιτροπή Αγνοουμένων.

    Η έρευνα αυτή υπονομεύεται από τη στάση του κράτους της Τουρκίας, που κρατά κλειστά τα στρατιωτικά αρχεία για τους χώρους ομαδικής ταφής των αγνοουμένων με αλλοιώσεις τόπων ταφής, μετακίνηση λειψάνων, εμποδίζοντας τις έρευνες. Να ανοίξει τώρα η τουρκική κυβέρνηση τα κρατικά και στρατιωτικά αρχεία. Να γίνει αποτελεσματική έρευνα στα κατεχόμενα για την ταυτοποίηση και απόδοση των λειψάνων, την αποζημίωση και στήριξη των οικογενειών των αγνοουμένων, μέχρι να διακριβωθεί και ο τελευταίος αγνοούμενος.

     
       

       

    (Fin de las intervenciones con arreglo al procedimiento de solicitud incidental de uso de la palabra («catch the eye»))

     
       

     

      El presidente. – Se cierra el debate.

     

    16. One-minute speeches on matters of political importance


     

      Branko Grims (PPE). – Gospod predsednik! V Sloveniji se že ves čas njenega članstva v Evropski uniji očitno zlorablja pravosodje za onemogočanje opozicije, zlasti SDS in njenega predsednika Janeza Janše. Najprej je bil to kafkovski proces Patria, potem sedaj absurdni proces Trenta, nekaj, za kar se je zgodilo pred dvajsetimi leti. Vedno to oživi pred naslednjimi volitvami. Sodnik Radonjić, ki je razgalil pritiske globoke države, je bil zaradi tega sam obtožen, privlečen v lisicah na sodišče in obsojen, čeprav je imel potrdilo zdravnika, da zaradi hude bolezni ni sposoben obrambe na sodišču. Evropsko komisijo sem obširno in argumentirano seznanil z vsemi temi očitnimi kršitvami človekovih pravic v pismih in intervjujih. Vendar Evropska komisija molči, in v pravu velja “Kdor molči, se strinja”. Zato jo pozivam, da pojasni, kako bo ukrepala, da bo tudi v Sloveniji zagotovljen pravni red in da bo vsakomur zagotovljeno pošteno sojenje. Bog vas živi, Bog živi Evropo, Bog živi Slovenijo!

     
       


     

      Philippe Olivier (PfE). – Monsieur le Président, les carburants alternatifs sont l’illustration d’une certaine inconséquence de l’Union européenne. Vous édictez des règles, les imposez à nos filières, en l’occurrence l’aérien et le maritime, puis vous laissez le marché décider. Le résultat, ce sont des filières qui ne savent pas à quels procédés techniques se vouer, des infrastructures, par exemple dans les aéroports, dont vous ne vous préoccupez pas, mais surtout des filières de production qui profitent aux Chinois, comme par exemple la phase d’électrolyse pour certains carburants.

    Que dire des distorsions de subventions? Quand les USA subventionnent à 3 tout le secteur, vous, vous subventionnez à 0,5 en étant exagérément sélectifs.

    L’Europe doit rapidement sortir de sa naïveté et protéger ses industries émergentes en mettant en œuvre une protection économique. Sans cela, la révolution des nouveaux carburants surviendra, certes, mais hors de l’Europe, et surtout à son détriment.

     
       


     

      Ana Miranda Paz (Verts/ALE). – Señor presidente, ¿saben qué significa la palabra facha? Se lo explico. Vean los vídeos y fotografías del cónclave de fachas que se celebró en Madrid el fin de semana pasado: Abascal, Orbán, Le Pen, Wilders, Salvini, André Ventura. Lo peor de cada casa pagado por el Grupo Patriotas por Europa del Parlamento Europeo. Teorías conspiranoicas, negacionismo climático, discursos de odio contra la democracia y la Europa de los pueblos, contra los colectivos más vulnerables, contra el colectivo LGBTIQ+, contra nosotras, las mujeres. En definitiva, una exaltación y un ataque fascista y a la democracia. Fascismo que campa a sus anchas, que ya controla y marca la agenda en algunos Estados miembros de la Unión Europea. ¿Cuándo va Europa a despertar y parar este monstruo de fanatismo contra los derechos y libertades?

    En 2018 fui ponente de este Parlamento para la Resolución sobre el auge de la violencia neofascista en Europa, para pararles los pies y resistir contra esta nueva embestida. Esa Resolución decía claramente que no se debía exaltar el neofascismo. Poco ha hecho Europa para pararles; les lava la cara, sobre todo el PP español, que permite y blanquea esos cónclaves fachas.

    Recuerden la palabra, señores de allí: fachas. Que no se les olvide. Una peste para Europa.

     
       



     

      Hélder Sousa Silva (PPE). – Senhor Presidente, a segurança e a defesa finalmente tornaram‑se prioridades da nossa União. A segurança e a defesa, depois da alimentação e da água, estão na base da pirâmide das necessidades humanas. Sem segurança e defesa não há direitos sociais. E o investimento na defesa não é apenas uma despesa, tem um efeito multiplicador na economia, tal como a criação de emprego, na investigação científica e no desenvolvimento social. O reforço da defesa pode e deve ser financiado sem sacrificar o modelo social europeu, por exemplo, através de empréstimos europeus tipo PRR de maior envolvimento do Banco Europeu de Investimento, assim como de maior liberdade fiscal para os Estados-Membros. A diplomacia só é eficaz quando está apoiada numa capacidade de defesa credível. Países que não têm meios militares próprios tornam‑se dependentes da boa vontade de outros. Portanto, a Comissão Europeia não pode esperar até 2028 para agir, porque isso seria perder mais três anos e dar vantagem competitiva aos nossos adversários.

     
       


     

      Séverine Werbrouck (PfE). – Monsieur le Président, en ce moment même, plus de 450 navires de pêche sont bloqués à quai à cause de la brutale et irrationnelle reconduction de l’interdiction de pêche dans le golfe de Gascogne.

    En plus de pénaliser les pêcheurs qui ont déjà consenti à d’importants efforts, cette mesure a entraîné des pertes considérables pour l’ensemble des métiers à terre. Il est essentiel de rappeler qu’un emploi en mer génère trois à quatre emplois à terre: mareyeurs, mécaniciens, électriciens, forgerons maritimes, poissonniers dépendent directement de l’activité des bateaux. Sans indemnisation, ces professions subissent de lourdes pertes économiques avec des baisses de chiffre d’affaires sans aucune compensation.

    Les pêcheurs sont nos paysans de la mer. Ils ne demandent pas à vivre de subventions, mais à vivre de leur travail artisanal, à assurer leur rôle essentiel pour la souveraineté alimentaire et à transmettre leur savoir-faire aux générations futures. Ils appellent à des solutions pérennes, conciliant protection de la biodiversité et survie économique, plutôt qu’à des fermetures récurrentes et inefficaces qui mettent en péril de manière irréversible une filière qui fait notre fierté.

     
       

     

      Waldemar Buda (ECR). – Szanowni Państwo, wczoraj kanclerz Olaf Scholz przyznał w debacie z Friedrichem Merzem, że po prostu łamie prawo, to znaczy odsyła imigrantów, przewozi z własnego kraju do sąsiadów, w tym do Polski. W 2024 r. to było już kilkanaście tysięcy osób. To jest jawne i oczywiste łamanie przepisów, również europejskich. Dlatego z tego miejsca żądam reakcji Komisji Europejskiej.

    Dzisiaj pakt migracyjny jeszcze nie obowiązuje, w związku z tym nie można robić tego typu zabiegów w celu ratowania własnych obywateli, ponieważ my jako Polacy się z tym nie zgadzamy. Informacja o tym, że polski premier Donald Tusk wyraził na to zgodę, jest skandaliczna. I chciałbym państwa poinformować, że Donald Tusk nie ma zgody obywateli na tego typu działania, nie ma zgody na podpisanie paktu migracyjnego, czego już dokonał. I przygotowujemy w Polsce referendum, które pokaże sprzeciw wobec was, wobec Komisji Europejskiej, Niemców i wobec tego nierządu, który dzisiaj mamy w Polsce.

     
       

     

      Hannah Neumann (Verts/ALE). – Mr President, even loving your parents is a crime under the brutal rule of the Iranian regime. Nima was three years old when his mother, Sakharov laureate Nasrin Sotoudeh, was thrown into prison. Her crime? Defending women’s rights. Nima grew up visiting her through glass barriers. His father, Reza, held the family together while the regime tried everything to tear it apart. And now they have come for Reza to punish Nasrin for not wearing hijab. Nima, now 17, wanted to see his father in prison. But in Iran even that is a battle. When he protested the sudden cancellation of an in-person visit, they beat him up, smashed his head against the stairwell, ripped out his earring, left him handcuffed and bleeding. Nasrin screamed until she lost her voice. For years, Nasrin and Reza have tried to shield their children from the horrors of the regime, but in that moment it all collapsed. Yet Nasrin’s message is clear: she will not surrender. She will keep fighting for a future beyond this darkness. And we will stand with her. We will stand with Nima, with Reza, with the countless families shattered by this regime. Until the mullahs open the doors of Evin. Until no child goes up into the shadows of prison walls anymore. (The speaker concluded in a non-official language.)

     
       



     

      Victor Negrescu (S&D). – Domnule președinte, să cumpărăm local, să susținem producătorii și fermierii – asta spuneam în urmă cu câțiva ani, tot aici, în Parlamentul European. Între timp, am promovat o petiție aprobată de legislativul european, am interpelat comisia, am amendat legislația, am obținut fonduri europene suplimentare pentru fermierii și producătorii români și am îmbunătățit drepturile lucrătorilor din supermarketuri și ale celor care lucrează pentru platformele online.

    Extremiștii din România tăceau atunci și făceau cumpărături în magazine de lux. Nici acum nu vin cu vreo soluție viabilă, copiind și suindu-se pe un trend european pe care nici măcar nu îl înțeleg. Dincolo de gălăgia eurosugativelor suveraniste, avem responsabilitatea să ne concentrăm pe soluții: mai puțini intermediari, accesul micilor producători în supermarketuri, fără taxe de raft, susținerea brandurilor locale, mai puțină birocrație și subvenții mai mari pentru fermieri.

    Doar prin măsuri comune la nivel european putem să sprijinim micii fermieri. Să nu abordăm acest subiect cu populism! Să ne concentrăm pe soluții reale pentru oameni!

     
       

     

      Rody Tolassy (PfE). – Monsieur le Président, chers collègues, Haïti sombre dans le chaos absolu. Cinq mille morts en un an, des corps mutilés, brûlés, des massacres ciblés, un État en ruine, livré aux gangs, qui contrôlent 80 % de Port-au-Prince. Et pourtant, des milliards d’euros ont été investis pendant des décennies de coopération. Pour quel résultat? Éducation en lambeaux, insécurité alimentaire, dignité humaine piétinée. L’échec total.

    Ce chaos déborde. Une bombe migratoire menace nos territoires et tout le bassin caribéen. La pression devient insoutenable. L’Union européenne peut-elle cautionner, continuer de se cacher derrière des discours creux et des programmes inefficaces? Où sont les résultats? Quelles actions concrètes allons-nous prendre pour garantir la sécurité et la survie du peuple haïtien?

    Nous devons rompre avec cette logique d’échec. Exigeons des résultats immédiats de la mission multinationale et agissons. Une mission de codéveloppement immédiate est indispensable pour stabiliser Haïti et lui offrir un avenir.

    L’heure est à l’action, pas au constat.

     
       


     

      Jaume Asens Llodrà (Verts/ALE). – Señor presidente, este fin de semana en Madrid ha habido un cónclave de ultras, lo mejor de cada casa de la internacional reaccionaria. También se ha emitido una serie documental de una periodista, Mònica Terribas, sobre el Opus Dei, organización a la que muchos de ellos pertenecen. ¿Y qué relación tiene una cosa con la otra? Pues que mientras en su particular cruzada religiosa contra las comunidades musulmanas han puesto otra vez el grito en el cielo contra estas, en cambio, han callado, no han dicho nada, frente a los abusos que ese documental ha puesto sobre la mesa: amenazas, coacciones, secuestros, explotación laboral y sexista, privación de la libertad, etcétera.

    Ese es el modus operandi de una organización que actúa en más de sesenta países como una secta peligrosa, como una organización criminal, y desde Europa no podemos quedarnos callados: debemos actuar y dar protección a las víctimas, que puedan ejercer su derecho a la verdad, a la reparación y a la justicia, como hicieron los menores abusados sexualmente por la Iglesia católica.

     
       

     

      Carola Rackete (The Left). – Herr Präsident! Vor sieben Monaten hat das Berliner Kammergericht eine Person, Maja T., nach Ungarn ausgeliefert, und letzte Woche hat dann das Bundesverfassungsgericht Majas Beschwerde darüber stattgegeben und festgehalten, dass die Auslieferung ein schwerwiegender Eingriff in Majas Grundrecht ist, der immer noch andauert. Explizit genannt wurde in der Begründung die unmenschliche Behandlung in Ungarn, die gegen die EU-Grundrechtecharta verstößt. Frankreich und Italien haben sich in ähnlichen Fällen gegen Auslieferungen nach Ungarn entschieden.

    Maja T. ist seit sieben Monaten in Isolationshaft, und schon 15 Tage sind laut UN Folter. In der Zelle gibt es Kakerlaken und Bettwanzen. Die Dokumente für das Gerichtsverfahren wurden nicht übersetzt. Ich selbst habe Maja schon zweimal besucht, und auch die Justizbeamten haben mir gesagt, dass die Haftbedingungen von oben angeordnet wurden – und zwar, denke ich, weil Maja eine antifaschistisch motivierte Tat vorgeworfen wird. Die Forderung von 24 Jahren Haft ist ebenfalls politisch.

    Ich fordere alle europäischen Mitgliedstaaten auf, keine Menschen mehr nach Ungarn auszuliefern, denn wir wissen ja, wie die Haftbedingungen dort sind. Die deutsche Bundesregierung fordere ich auf, Maja T. so schnell wie möglich zurückzuholen.

     
       

     

      Δημήτρης Τσιόδρας (PPE). – Κύριε Πρόεδρε, όλοι αναγνωρίζουμε ότι ζούμε σε ένα καινούργιο γεωπολιτικό και οικονομικό περιβάλλον. Επίσης, συζητάμε για τις μεγάλες προκλήσεις. Παράλληλα, όμως, θα πρέπει να δούμε και τις ευκαιρίες. Η Ευρώπη πορεύτηκε πάντα μέσα από δυσκολίες.

    Είναι ευκαιρία, λοιπόν, για κοινές πολιτικές. Να δώσουμε απαντήσεις στα ερωτήματα των πολιτών. Γιατί, όσο δεν δίνουν αυτές τις απαντήσεις οι φιλοευρωπαϊκές δυνάμεις, δίνουμε τον χώρο σε ακραίες φωνές, οι οποίες θέλουν επιστροφή στο παρελθόν.

    Πρέπει να δούμε πρώτα από όλα το ζήτημα της ασφάλειας και της άμυνας. Πρέπει οι Ευρωπαίοι πολίτες να αισθάνονται ασφαλείς. Πρέπει να νιώθουν ότι υπάρχουν κοινά ευρωπαϊκά σύνορα, τα οποία προστατεύονται. Πρέπει να υπάρχει κοινή δέσμευση στην άμυνα και παράλληλα να νιώθουν ότι, με τις πολιτικές που εφαρμόζονται σε ευρωπαϊκό επίπεδο, εξασφαλίζεται ένα καλύτερο μέλλον για αυτούς και τα παιδιά τους. Οι καιροί δεν περιμένουν και είναι η ώρα να δράσουμε αποφασιστικά τώρα.

     
       

     

      Maria Grapini (S&D). – Domnule președinte, doamnă comisară, politica energetică pe care a făcut-o Comisia Europeană – nu dumneavoastră, cea care a fost – este dezastruoasă. Efectele asupra competitivității, mai ales pentru întreprinderile mici și mijlocii, se văd acum. Doamna comisară, vă propun să discutați în Colegiul comisarilor, să faceți o adevărată politică energetică.

    Nu se poate să închidem întâi producerea de energie, înainte de a avea alternativă. Și este clar că s-a intrat în criză. Atât timp cât întreprinderile din Uniunea Europeană plătesc de trei, patru ori mai mult prețul energiei decât cele din Statele Unite sau din Asia, evident că nu mai sunt competitive, evident că sunt într-o competiție inegală, evident că sunt scoase din piață.

    Așadar, politica energetică a Uniunii Europene trebuie făcută în sensul susținerii producției industriale. Avem un program de reindustrializare a Uniunii Europene. Cum să-l facem cu aceste costuri? Cel care face producție știe că inputurile sunt importante pentru prețul final. Sper, de la această Comisie, că într-adevăr – din păcate, avem același dirijor, pe același președinte al Comisiei – dar sper să puneți, într-adevăr, o strategie energetică pentru a crește competitivitatea Uniunii Europene.

     
       

     

      Isabella Tovaglieri (PfE). – Signor Presidente, onorevoli colleghi, l’industria dell’auto sta morendo sotto i colpi dell’estremismo green della Commissione europea e i responsabili sono seduti qui in quest’Aula.

    Invece di fare marcia indietro, però, vi siete inventati il dialogo strategico sull’automotive, che altro non è che fumo negli occhi e voi ne siete i primi ad essere consapevoli. Riunioni avvolte nella nebbia, lontane da occhi indiscreti, nessuna agenda pubblica, nessun obiettivo preciso. E come finirà? Ve lo dico io: in chiacchiere da bar, che servono solo a pulirvi la coscienza, più che a dare risposte concrete a uno dei settori più strategici dell’industria europea, che voi avete messo in ginocchio.

    Invece di tante inutili conferenze e riunioni segrete, fate l’unica cosa che vi chiedono i cittadini europei: cancellate lo stop ai motori tradizionali al 2035, mettete fine alla stagione dell’ideologia green e diamo inizio a quella del pragmatismo.

     
       

     

      Andi Cristea (S&D). – Domnule președinte, tehnologia informațională accelerează până la derapaje toate procesele sociale, politice, economice, cu care noi suntem obișnuiți. Ăsta este motivul pentru care astăzi, în același timp, lucrurile sunt mult mai bune decât erau în trecut, dar și mult mai rele.

    Domnule președinte, avem nevoie să echipăm cetățenii europeni cu modele mentale, cu instrumente cognitive care să le ofere posibilitatea să navigheze cu succes acest nou mediu informațional.

    Propunerea mea pentru Comisia Europeană și îndemnul meu este să folosim bani europeni, pentru programe europene de alfabetizare digitală, alfabetizare tehnologică și alfabetizare media – sunt singurele modalități prin care vom avea cetățeni pregătiți pentru ziua de mâine. Acesta este apelul meu și vă îndemn să acționați!

     
       

     

      Virginie Joron (PfE). – Monsieur le Président, chers collègues, grâce à Donald Trump, nous apprenons que la BBC est financée par les Américains, mais aussi par Bruxelles: 1,3 million de livres en 2023. Un chiffre invisible dans le système de transparence financière de la Commission, qui indique 39 millions d’euros payés à la chaîne anglaise depuis 2014.

    Pourquoi Bruxelles finance des médias? Est-ce que Reactive, un média europhile, peut critiquer la Commission s’il reçoit 36 millions d’euros de la part de la Commission?

    Pourquoi financer des médias étrangers?

    Pourquoi financer Internews, dont personne n’a jamais entendu parler, qui reçoit de l’argent de M. Soros ou de lobbys des vaccins? À Paris, leur bureau rue Jeanne d’Arc est désert. Pourtant, Bruxelles leur aurait versé 72 millions d’euros et les Américains, via USAID, près d’un demi-milliard de dollars. Sa présidente gagnerait près de 400 000 dollars par an et, l’année dernière, à Davos, elle a recommandé de démonétiser des sites d’information en développant des listes d’exclusion de publicités.

    La Commission doit nous expliquer et surtout doit cesser ces subventions occultes de contrôle des médias et de corruption potentielle.

     
       

     

      Juan Fernando López Aguilar (S&D). – Señor presidente, cada semana que transcurre continúan llegando a Canarias esas embarcaciones frágiles, repletas de personas desesperadas que provienen del continente africano. Canarias es Unión Europea, pero continúan llegando también al Caribe las embarcaciones repletas de cadáveres de aquellos desdichados que no lo consiguieron.

    Y la lección de tanta tragedia es imperativa: urge que la Comisión acelere la plena aplicación de todas las leyes obligatorias para los Estados miembros que componen el Pacto sobre Migración y Asilo y, particularmente, que acelere la puesta en marcha del coordinador de la UE para la solidaridad, que permita una redistribución ordenada, justa, equitativa y solidaria de aquellas personas en situación muy vulnerable: mujeres con menores, mujeres víctimas de trata y de explotación de personas, y menores no acompañados, que requieren también en España solidaridad, impedida hasta la fecha por la oposición de la derecha.

    Urge una reforma legal que la haga posible, pero sobre todo urge que la Comisión exija a todos los Estados miembros el cumplimiento de sus obligaciones con el Pacto y diga con claridad que no es admisible que un jefe de Gobierno —como hemos oído esta semana a Donald Tusk en Polonia— diga que no va a aplicar el Pacto sobre Migración y Asilo, como si ignorase que el Derecho europeo es obligatorio en su primacía y en su eficacia directa para todos los Estados miembros.

     
       

     

      Valérie Deloge (PfE). – Monsieur le Président, un nouveau scandale éclabousse les institutions européennes. La Commission européenne a financé des ONG dites environnementales pour faire pression en faveur du pacte vert. Ce green deal, symbole de l’écologie punitive, veut imposer plus de normes, restreindre les agriculteurs et les entreprises et interdire les moteurs thermiques en 2035.

    Des millions d’euros d’argent public ont été utilisés via le programme LIFE et distribués à des lobbies. Objectif: influencer les décisions du Parlement européen et les députés, manipuler les débats et durcir la législation verte.

    Le commissaire à l’agriculture, M. Hansen, incarne cette dérive. Chargé de préparer une vision sur l’agriculture et l’alimentation, il consulte Greenpeace, WWF, BirdLife. Mais où sont les agriculteurs? Qui écoute ceux qui nous nourrissent?

    Pendant que ces groupes dictent la politique agricole, les vrais acteurs de terrain sont méprisés, ignorés. L’Europe n’a pas à être gouvernée par des lobbies qui ne produisent rien, mais qui veulent tout contrôler. Les amis de Mme Von Der Leyen, qui n’ont jamais semé un grain de blé, ni produit un litre de lait, n’ont pas à nous imposer leur utopie.

    Ce scandale rappelle d’autres affaires, comme le Qatargate ou les financements troubles d’associations islamistes proches des Frères musulmans. Stop, Bruxelles doit rendre des comptes! Le Parquet européen ainsi que les autorités antifraude doivent faire toute la lumière sur ces affaires. Nous ne lâcherons rien.

     
       


     

      Gabriela Firea (S&D). – Domnule președinte, dragi colegi, în România este cutremur politic. Președintele României și-a dat demisia și avem mai bine de trei luni de când agenda publică este ocupată doar de incertitudine. Însă nu trebuie să uităm adevăratul cutremur, mișcare telurică, ce ne poate lovi oricând.

    Nu vreau să induc panică, dar este un avertisment al specialiștilor: 7 din 10 români trăiesc în zone cu pericol seismic. Sunt copii care învață în școli nesigure, familii care dorm în blocuri fragile, pacienți care merg să se trateze în spitale pericol public. Și totuși, în ultimii 5 ani, în România și în București, unul dintre cele mai expuse orașe, aproape nimic nu s-a consolidat. În martie se împlinesc 48 de ani de la ultimul mare cutremur.

    Da, există un miliard de euro alocat, dar acești bani acoperă doar 55 de clădiri, adică doar 5 % din necesar. Birocrația sufocă măsuri vitale. Fondurile europene sunt insuficient folosite. Și să nu uităm cel mai important lucru: acești bani nu sunt pentru beton și pentru pereți, sunt pentru a proteja oamenii, sunt pentru viață.

    De aceea, fac un apel clar: Europa, care și-a asumat protecția cetățenilor săi, trebuie să acționeze acum: fonduri suplimentare, mecanisme simple, prevenție reală, iar autoritățile locale să folosească la maximum resursele financiare ale Uniunii Europene!

     

    17. Agenda of the next sitting

     

      El presidente. – La próxima sesión tendrá lugar mañana, martes 11 de febrero de 2025, a las 9.00 horas.

    El orden del día se ha publicado y está disponible en el sitio web del Parlamento Europeo.

     

    18. Approval of the minutes of the sitting

     

      El presidente. – El Acta de la presente sesión se someterá a la aprobación del Parlamento mañana al comienzo de la tarde.

     

    19. Closure of the sitting

       

    (Se levanta la sesión a las 22.08 horas).

     

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    February 12, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Ernst Bill Pursuing $200 Billion in COVID Fraud Advances

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Joni Ernst (R-IA)

    WASHINGTON – The Senate Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship passed Chair Joni Ernst’s (R-Iowa) Complete COVID Collections Act to extend the life of the watchdog tasked with tracking down criminals who stole COVID relief designed for small businesses.
    Ernst led several of her Republican colleagues in introducing the bill after the Special Inspector General for Pandemic Recovery (SIGPR) warned its authority was expiring and con artists would get away with stealing more than $200 billion.
    “I will not allow fraudsters to get away with stealing hundreds of billions of dollars from taxpayers,” said Ernst. “We are going to recoup every cent and end the cycle in Washington of shrugging off a few billion here and a few hundred million there. That irresponsible mindset is why the federal government is more than $36 trillion in debt. I’m proud to lead this step forward to treat tax dollars like a family treats its budget instead of like a bottomless slush fund.”
    The bill is cosponsored by Senators Todd Young (R-Ind.), Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.), James Lankford (R-Okla.), Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), Eric Schmitt (R-Mo.), and John Curtis (R-Utah).
    “Programs designed to provide relief to our small businesses were repeatedly taken advantage of, leaving small businesses hurting and taxpayers on the hook,” said Young. “I’m glad to see this effort to recover taxpayer dollars and protect Americans from fraud and abuse pass out of committee. I look forward to voting for this bill on the Senate floor.”
    “During the pandemic, small business owners in need of financial assistance were turned away because criminals, gang members, and drug traffickers stole money from the relief program,” said Blackburn. “This legislation would help ensure we recoup every penny of funding that was wrongly awarded to criminals who gamed the system.”
    “Family-owned businesses in Utah played the rules and used COVID-19 relief funds as intended, but bad actors exploited the system and defrauded taxpayers,” said Curtis. “By extending oversight authority over these programs, our legislation strengthens enforcement efforts and holds criminals accountable for stealing from the American people. I’m proud to see our bill pass out of the Small Business Committee.”

    Click here to view the bill text.
    Background:
    While SBA ran the relief programs on a “first come, first serve” basis, the money ran out quickly, and many qualifying businesses were turned away as felons, gang members, and drug traffickers raked in cash. Some swindlers uploaded pictures of Barbie dolls as photo identification on SBA loan applications that were approved.One alleged fraudster took home $8 million while nearly 2,000 struggling restaurants in Iowa were left empty-handed. Ernst detailed this in her report titled Small Business COVID-19 Fraud: Three Years Later State of Play – where she outlined the Biden SBA’s effort to discount the full extent of fraud and cast doubt on the legitimate estimates made by expert investigators.Ernst’s tireless advocacy forced the Biden administration to eventually take action to recover billions in COVID aid in January 2024.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    February 12, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: LIFT Program Opens Applications for $1.75 Million in Business Loan Funding

    Source: US State of North Dakota

    The North Dakota Department of Commerce announces the reopening of the Legacy Investment for Technology (LIFT) application process.  This funding opportunity drives economic growth in our state by fueling innovative North Dakota businesses. 

    “The LIFT funds equip North Dakota businesses commercializing intellectual property with debt financing at advantageous interest rates,” Commerce Economic Development & Finance Deputy Director Shayden Akason said. “We’re excited to open the fund to new innovative projects.”

    Eligible industries include advanced computing and data management, agricultural technology, autonomous and uncrewed vehicles, energy, healthcare, value-added agriculture, value-added energy, and any area identified by the LIFT Committee as contributing to the state’s economic diversification.

    Applications for the LIFT program will be accepted through March 14, 2025. A total of $1.75 million in loan funding will be available for successful applicants.

    For more information, application guidelines and program details, visit https://belegendary.link/LIFT. 

    MIL OSI USA News –

    February 12, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Nations: Experts of the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights Welcome Croatia’s Anti-Discrimination Measures, Raise Issues Concerning Reported Exploitation of Migrant Workers and the Social Benefit Scheme

    Source: United Nations – Geneva

    The Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights today concluded its review of the second periodic report of Croatia under the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, with Committee Experts commending the State’s law and national action plan against discrimination, and raising issues concerning reported exploitation of migrant workers and the social benefit scheme.

    Karla Vanessa Lemus de Vásquez, Committee Expert and Lead Member of the Taskforce on Croatia, welcomed Croatia’s law against discrimination and the national action plan on combatting discrimination and protecting human rights.

    Joo-Young Lee, Committee Expert and Member of the Taskforce on Croatia, said migrant workers in Croatia were particularly vulnerable to poor working conditions, including non-payment for work, and failure to provide breaks or employment contracts.  What measures had been taken to address labour exploitation of migrant workers?

    Ms. Lee also cited reports that social assistance benefits were inadequate and often not sufficient to cover the cost of living.  What measures had the State party taken to address this?  Why had the number of beneficiaries decreased recently, and why did some regions require recipients of benefits to participate in community service?

    Ivan Vidiš, State Secretary, Ministry of Labour, Pension System, Family and Social Policy of Croatia and head of the delegation, introducing the report, said that the State party was proud of the reforms underway in Croatia.  In early 2023, Croatia joined the Schengen area, and the euro was introduced as a national currency.

    Mr. Vidiš said the National Plan for the Protection and Promotion of Human Rights and Anti-Discrimination for the period up to 2027 was adopted to ensure coordinated action by State administration bodies in the field of human rights protection and anti-discrimination, and to raise awareness of equality.

    On protections for migrant workers, Mr. Vidiš said labour legislation provided for third-country nationals legally working in Croatia to have the same rights as national workers, and the new Act on Combatting Undeclared Work obliged the employer to pay six months of salary to unregistered workers as well as a fine.

    On the social benefit scheme, the delegation said the number of recipients of the guaranteed minimum benefit had been dropping recently, in line with the reduction in unemployment.  The benefit had been increased three times in recent years, and the State party had developed a new Social Welfare Act that would increase the minimum social benefit.  The Act would also allow for persons to be excused from community service activities if they were unable to participate.

    In concluding remarks, Ms. Lemus de Vásquez thanked the delegation for the information shared, which provided insight into the progress achieved and measures planned to give effect to the Covenant in Croatia.  The Committee’s aim was to ensure the full realisation of economic, social and cultural rights for all persons in Croatia.

    Mr. Vidiš, in his concluding remarks, said Croatia was passionate about its work, open about its challenges, and determined to address them.  Economic, social and cultural rights were the cornerstone of the State party’s efforts.  Mr. Vidiš thanked the Committee for its constructive approach to the dialogue.

    In her concluding remarks, Laura-Maria Craciunean-Tatu, Committee Chair, thanked the delegation for the open and constructive way in which it had participated in the dialogue.  The Committee hoped that Croatia would address the Committee’s forthcoming recommendations with a constructive spirit.

    The delegation of Croatia was comprised of representatives from the Ministry of Labour, Pension System, Family and Social Policy; Ministry of Physical Planning, Construction and State Property; Ministry of Science, Education and Youth; Office for Human Rights and Rights of National Minorities; Ministry of Finance; Croatian Employment Service; Ministry of the Interior; Ministry of Health; Ministry of Environmental Protection and Green Transition; Ministry of Foreign and European Affairs; Ministry of Justice, Public Administration and Digital Transformation; and the Permanent Mission of Croatia to the United Nations Office at Geneva.

    The Committee’s seventy-seventh session is being held until 28 February 2025.  All documents relating to the Committee’s work, including reports submitted by States parties, can be found on the session’s webpage.  Webcasts of the meetings of the session can be found here, and meetings summaries can be found here.

    The Committee will next meet in public at 3 p.m. on Wednesday, 12 February to begin its consideration of the fifth periodic report of Peru (E/C.12/PER/5).

    Report

    The Committee has before it the second periodic report of Croatia (E/C.12/HRV/2).

    Presentation of Report

    IVAN VIDIŠ, State Secretary, Ministry of Labour, Pension System, Family and Social Policy of Croatia and head of the delegation, said that the State party was proud of the reforms underway in Croatia.  In early 2023, Croatia joined the Schengen area, and the euro was introduced as a national currency.  As part of the European Economic Area, Croatia was exposed to inflationary developments caused the pandemic and then the war in Ukraine.  The Government intervened to a limited extent in energy prices and provided seven aid packages, all with the aim of protecting particularly vulnerable population groups.

    The National Plan for the Protection and Promotion of Human Rights and Anti-Discrimination for the period up to 2027 was adopted to ensure coordinated action by State administration bodies in the field of human rights protection and anti-discrimination, and to raise awareness of equality. 

    The State party had implemented a series of measures to strengthen workers’ rights.  The new Act on Combatting Undeclared Workers provided strict measures for employers who did not declare workers, including giving such workers the right to be registered and receive pay, pension and health insurance for the last six months, and foreign workers had access to the same protections as national workers.  Active employment policy measures had resulted in a historically low number of unemployed people.  Unemployment benefits had been increased and amendments had also been made to the labour legislation, laying down provisions on work through digital labour platforms and limiting the use of fixed-term contracts.

    In 2024, the salaries of civil servants and public service employees financed from the State budget were reformed towards a more transparent and fairer system.  The remuneration system for judges and prosecutors had also been revised to ensure that they could work smoothly and independently.  The minimum wage was constantly increasing and had almost doubled compared to 2019.

    To promote the social inclusion of vulnerable groups, the Government had provided increased rights and coverage for these groups in the Social Welfare Act and adopted the inclusive benefit, which significantly improved living standards.  Further, the State party had implemented measures to support elderly people.

    A new national plan for protection against violence against women and domestic violence, covering the period up to 2028, was under development.  As part of this plan, in 2024, a package of regulations dedicated to combatting violence against women and domestic violence entered into force, which included amendments to the Criminal Code, the Criminal Procedure Code, and the Act on Protection from Domestic Violence.  The legislative package tightened sentencing and strengthened protective measures for victims.  The revised Criminal Code introduced a definition of “gender-based violence against women” that was in line with the Istanbul Convention and a new criminal offence of femicide.

    There were 123,000 foreign workers in Croatia.  The State party had introduced legislation to combat undeclared work, and existing labour legislation provided for third-country nationals legally working in Croatia to have the same rights as national workers.

    After the 2020 earthquakes, many public facilities had been renovated, and multi-dwelling buildings and family replacement houses were being built.  To ensure the availability of housing, especially for young families, Croatia’s first national housing policy plan up to 2030 had been drawn up.  At the end of 2024, the Government adopted a programme for the construction and renovation of housing units in assisted areas to help young people and families access housing and to encourage population growth in these areas.

    Significant measures had also been taken over the last three years to strengthen the free legal aid system.  A call for funding for projects to provide primary legal aid was launched for a three-year period from 2023 to 2025.  Funding for projects increased by 100 per cent in 2023.

    Croatia expressed its strong commitment to the realisation of the human rights enshrined in the Covenant, demonstrated by its achievement of a high level of human rights protection.

    Questions by a Committee Expert

    KARLA VANESSA LEMUS DE VÁSQUEZ, Committee Expert, Country Rapporteur and Lead Member of the Taskforce on Croatia, asked about the number of cases in which the Covenant was invoked in domestic courts.  What was the domestic legal status of the treaty bodies’ observations?  Did Croatia plan to adopt the Optional Protocol?  How had the legislature and civil society participated in implementing the Committee’s previous concluding observations and in drafting the State party’s reports?  Did the State party have a national follow-up mechanism to coordinate follow-up activities?

    Croatia had great potential, considering its location, resources and human capital.  However, the State party was reportedly overdependent on the tourism industry, which hampered the productivity of businesses.  What measures were in place to increase the productivity of the private sector and reduce dependence on tourism?  Were there measures in place to build workers’ capacities?

    Croatia did not have a national action plan on business and human rights and due diligence regulations were not sufficient.  What measures had the State party implemented to transpose the European Union directive on due diligence into national law?  What measures were in place to ensure due diligence in the private sector and to help victims of human rights violations to access justice?

    Croatia had received low grades in greenhouse gas emissions, energy usage, and climate policy in a recent review.  Would Croatia be able to meet its climate commitments for 2030 and 2050?  What were the main challenges in this regard?  How would the State party rapidly cut greenhouse gas emissions?  What plans were in place to eradicate subsidies for fossil fuels and to reallocate funds to renewable energy?

    Official development assistance represented 0.2 per cent of gross domestic product, well below the 0.7 per cent recommended by the United Nations.  Were there plans to increase the budget allocated to such assistance in the next few years?

    The Committee welcomed the law against discrimination and the national action plan on combatting discrimination and protecting human rights.  Had the 2024 and 2025 plans been implemented and to what extent?

    The Roma had been facing discrimination regarding access to housing and healthcare in Croatia.  What progress had been made in combatting hate crimes against the Roma and in implementing the national action plan on inclusion of the Roma?  What measures were in place to address the gender gap in participation in the labour market and to combat stereotypes against women in the private sector?  Were there any wage equality measures in place?

    Responses by the Delegation

    The delegation said Croatia had one of the highest growth rates for gross domestic product in the European Union, at 3.6 per cent.  The State party had been using European Union funds to increase skills for around 140,000 citizens.  Judicial experts and judges had received training on the Covenant.  Croatia was working to continuously train public officers on human rights, particularly the rights of the Roma and vulnerable women and girls.

    Discussion on signing the Optional Protocol was ongoing, with public consultations being carried out.  If stakeholders found that the Optional Protocol was relevant to Croatia, the State party would launch ratification procedures.

    Croatia had working groups for developing legislation that included experts from line ministries and civil society representatives.  Analyses were carried out to determine areas where legislation needed to be aligned with international law and the recommendations of treaty bodies.

    Croatia had a strong tourism industry due to its location and natural and cultural heritage.  The Government was promoting sustainable tourism, implementing accommodation and environmental policies to regulate development in the sector.  There were around 270,000 pieces of property used for short-term renting to tourists.  New regulations addressed this, encouraging owners to provide long-term rental schemes and permanent housing.

    The State party was working on reforming vocational training to increase its availability, quality and relevance, and reduce school dropouts.  A new modular curriculum had been developed to allow students to engage in work experience activities.

    The new national action plan on the inclusion of the Roma covered the period of 2021 to 2027.  Around 57 per cent of financing programmes were in the education field.  The Government was also working on policies promoting access to healthcare and improved quality of life for the Roma population.

    Croatia was a part of the European Union’s ambitious climate policy, which aimed to make Europe climate neutral by 2050.  Under this policy, Croatia was working to reduce dependence on fossil fuels.  The national strategy on low carbon development and the national energy and climate plan had been developed to guide efforts to achieve climate objectives.  The plan included a measure for gradually abolishing subsidies for fossil fuels.  The State party had been monitoring national emissions using a database on emissions.

    Croatia’s gender employment gap, at 11.4 per cent, was lower than the European Union average.  Wage transparency policies were helping the State to achieve equal pay for equal work.  Measures had been developed to support access to employment for women in rural areas and women over the age of 50.

    There had been a spike in hate crimes following the increase in foreign workers in the State party.  To combat this, the Government had developed educational measures to promote the integration of foreign workers in society.

    Croatia was this year preparing to transpose the European Union directive on due diligence.  The national action plan on responsible businesses, which was being drafted by experts, aimed to support the implementation of the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.

    Follow-Up Questions by Committee Experts

    Committee Experts asked follow-up questions on measures implemented to bolster the capacity of the Ombudswoman’s office to ensure that it could carry out its mandate; the composition of bodies monitoring the implementation of treaty body recommendations; plans to address challenges related to disparities in regional development; the legal status of the Covenant in domestic legislation; measures to address unequal distribution of free legal aid services across the country; plans to broaden awareness raising activities on economic, social and cultural rights; and whether the State party planned to draft national action plans on human rights protections.

    Responses by the Delegation

    The delegation said that in Croatia, the Covenant had legal status and was directly applicable.  Public tender was provided to legal clinics to facilitate the provision of free legal aid across the State.  Funds for free legal aid were increased by 100 per cent in 2023 and by a further 30 per cent in 2024.  Transport fees were paid by the State when persons needed to travel more than 60 kilometres to attend courts.

    The salary system for the civil service had been reformed, including salaries for staff of the Ombudswoman’s Office.  On average, salaries for civil servants had been increased by around 30 per cent.  The budget for the Office had increased gradually since 2022.

    The Ministry of Labour, Pension System and Social Policy had a special service coordinating the implementation of the Covenant and other international documents.  Policies related to implementation were discussed with representatives of trade unions and civil society.

    The Federal Government was pursuing fiscal decentralisation and providing local and regional governments with funding to be used in regional development projects.  It sought to address gaps between less and more developed regions.

    The Social Housing Fund encouraged the population to live and work in rural areas, and a new programme on the construction of housing for young people focused on housing developments in rural areas.

    The new national action plan on human rights had been prepared but was currently being discussed in the Government.  The former plan was still in force.  National action plans on combatting trafficking in persons, promoting the inclusion of the Roma, and fighting discrimination were also being implemented.

    Questions by a Committee Expert

    JOO-YOUNG LEE, Committee Expert and Member of the Taskforce for Croatia, said that the State party had implemented employment policy measures focusing on the integration of vulnerable people into the labour market.  What impact had those measures had?  What was the trend in rates of young people who were not in employment, education or training over the last five years?

    What measures were in place to address the discrimination and prejudice faced by Roma persons in the workplace?  The disability employment gap was around 23 per cent as of 2023, related to a lack of reasonable accommodation measures.  How was the State party promoting the inclusion of persons with disabilities in the workplace?

    The Committee noted legislation addressing unregistered, unpaid and precarious work, but such work remained prevalent in the State party.  Migrant workers were particularly vulnerable to poor working conditions, including non-payment for work, and failure to provide breaks or employment contracts.  What were the root causes of labour exploitation of migrant workers and what measures had been taken to address them?  How was the State party working to improve the capacity of public officials to uphold migrant workers’ rights and impose appropriate sanctions on persons who violated those rights?

    Social assistance benefits were reportedly inadequate and often not sufficient to cover the cost of living.  What measures had the State party taken to address this?  Why had the number of beneficiaries decreased recently?  What budget had been devoted to social benefits in the last five years?  What measures had been implemented to improve social services for persons with disabilities, older persons, and persons living in rural areas?

    The “at risk of poverty” rate was around 42 per cent in Croatia.  This was reportedly due to strict requirements limiting access to unemployment benefits.  How did the State party ensure that unemployed persons did not fall into poverty?

    Responses by the Delegation

    The delegation said the State party provided educational and training support to unemployed persons.  Several hundreds of persons had found employment through the Government’s on-the-job training programme.

    Legislative changes and State-funded support centres had led to an increase in the registration of persons with disabilities and their inclusion in the labour market.  The unemployment rate for persons with disabilities was currently at a record low level.  The Government financed up to two-thirds of the salaries of persons with disabilities, including self-employed persons, and financed the adaption of workplaces to the needs of persons with disabilities.  The employment rate of persons with disabilities had increased by 70 per cent in recent years.

    The new Act on Combatting Undeclared Work obliged the employer to pay six months of salary to unregistered workers as well as a fine of 2,600 euros.  There was a public register of employers that had employed unregistered workers.

    The Government also had a register of persons who were not in employment, education or training.  It was planning programmes to involve these persons in education or the labour market.  Only 13 per cent of young people were currently unemployed, down from a historic high of around 50 per cent.  Croatia had removed many restrictions related to accessing unemployment benefits.

    Foreign workers received materials informing them of their rights to State services, including health care, unemployment benefits and complaints mechanisms.  The Government supported foreign workers to learn the Croatian language.

    The guaranteed minimum benefit was provided to persons who did not have basic sustenance.  More than 40,000 persons received this benefit.  The number of recipients had been dropping in recent years, in line with the reduction in unemployment.  The benefit had been increased three times in recent years, and there were plans to increase it further, along with other benefits.  The Government was working to amend the Social Welfare Act to increase the base payment for single parents and their children by 25 per cent.  The national allowance for the elderly provided support to persons who did not have sufficient pensions.  The Government was strengthening the capacities of institutions to monitor poverty and better combat it.

    Follow-Up Questions by Committee Experts

    JOO-YOUNG LEE, Committee Expert and Member of the Taskforce for Croatia, said it was welcome that the Act on Foreigner Workers would be amended and that the basic social benefit had increased.

    Committee Experts asked follow-up questions on the assessment of measures for housing provided to foreign workers; the methodology used to assess citizens’ risk of poverty; why some regions required recipients of benefits to participate in community service; the timeframe in which the minimum wage had increased and whether it covered the cost of living; whether rules regarding the renewal of temporary work contracts led to unemployment; measures being taken to promote entrepreneurship; the nationalities of migrant workers in the State party; and policies being implemented to enable women to enter the labour market and promote sharing of domestic work tasks.

    Responses by the Delegation

    The delegation said there were clear criteria in place regarding the accommodation of foreign workers.  The Government was working with the embassies of foreign countries to inform migrant workers about their rights.

    The percentage of persons at risk of poverty had not increased in recent years.  The State party had developed a new Social Welfare Act that would increase the minimum social benefit and would allow for persons to be excused from community service activities if they were unable to participate.  Community service often helped unemployed persons to enter the labour market.

    Around two per cent of workers received the minimum wage.  The Government had worked to ensure that all workers in vulnerable sectors such as manufacturing received at least the minimum wage.  The nominal minimum wage had been increased by 130 per cent between 2016 and 2025.  The real increase, taking inflation into account, was around 70 per cent.  The minimum wage was calculated considering other benefits being received.

    There were around 6,000 self-employed persons receiving State benefits.  Most benefits were provided in the food and construction industries.

    The State was developing a law to promote women’s return to work after childbirth.  It was financing the construction of kindergartens and schools and providing parental leave for fathers, which more than 60 per cent of fathers were taking.

    Questions by a Committee Expert

    ASRAF ALLY CAUNHYE Committee Expert and Member of the Taskforce for Croatia, said the escalation of violence against women in recent years in the State party was of great concern.  What measures were in place to provide support for victims, particularly women with disabilities?  How was the State party preventing the abuse of women with disabilities in institutions and addressing harmful practices affecting Roma women and children?  What measures were in place to prevent all forms of trafficking in persons, identify victims, prevent reprisals against victims after they reported offences, and ensure that penalties for trafficking were commensurate with the seriousness of offences?  How was the State party addressing the effects of inflation and the COVID-19 pandemic on vulnerable persons?

    Croatia did not have a needs-based housing policy or an effective strategy for addressing homelessness.  Approximately 6.5 per cent per cent of the population did not have access to the water supply network and many of the Roma lived in poor housing conditions.  What measures were in place to improve access to housing and housing conditions for vulnerable persons, prevent evictions of the Roma, and tackle homelessness?

    Some people in remote areas, particularly the Roma, had limited access to health services.  There was a shortage in healthcare staff in rural areas and long waiting lists for specialised care.  What measures were in place to provide timely access to quality healthcare in remote areas and to reduce waiting lists?  How would the State party promote access to healthcare for asylum seekers and persons with disabilities?  What steps had been taken to promote access to safe abortions when mothers’ lives were at risk?  What resources had been allocated to setting up mobile health teams and community mental health care services, and to combatting the high suicide rate?

    Responses by the Delegation

    The delegation said the national action plan on social services aimed to facilitate access to these services, secure a better regional distribution of services, including services for the elderly, and promote deinstitutionalisation and foster care.  Payments to foster families had been increased and media campaigns had been carried out to highlight their importance.  The act on personal assistance of 2023 regulated the recruitment of personal assistants for persons with disabilities.  Over 5,000 assistants were currently employed, and the Government was working to recruit more.

    The Government was conducting roundtables and workshops with employers to encourage the increased employment of the Roma and other vulnerable groups.  Career management centres were being established in every region of the State to support their access to employment.

    Croatia had issues with affordable housing, influenced by the war in Ukraine, the COVID-19 pandemic, and inflation.  Consultations were being carried out on a national housing plan, which would be adopted soon.  Under the plan, settlement of vulnerable and young persons and settlement in underdeveloped areas would be encouraged.  Croatia had a shortage of around 270,000 residential units compared to demand.  There were also around 50,000 unused residential units; the Government planned to adopt legislation to allow the State to take over empty units and provide them to vulnerable persons.  New laws would make it possible to build more affordable housing and expand land allocated for affordable housing.  The procedure for obtaining permits for building family homes would soon be simplified.

    The State party provided housing for victims of domestic violence and was also building family homes for the Roma community in rural areas.  Housing had also been provided for persons under international protection, and for persons whose homes were destroyed in earthquakes.  The State had also provided accommodation for over 600 homeless persons.  Large cities and counties provided food to homeless persons through social kitchens.

    Croatia had amended the Act on Water, which enhanced access to water for vulnerable groups.  Local government units were obliged to provide water for human use and to install wells in public spaces.  The State was investing heavily in the water distribution network to improve the quality and availability of water.

    The Government had provided seven different support packages to reduce the prices of energy, food, fuel and gas.  As a result, Croatia had the lowest energy prices in the European Union.  Some 70 retail products had also been subsidised by the State to protect vulnerable groups, and cash supports had been provided for more than 700,000 retirees.

    The Government was working to improve the legislative framework against gender-based violence.  Gender-based violence was treated as an aggravating circumstance in the Criminal Code, and Croatia was one of the first countries in Europe to make femicide a stand-alone crime.  The law against family violence had also been amended to increase sanctions for perpetrators and support for victims.  Victims were examined via video-link unless they insisted on being in the courtroom.  Training on gender-based violence was provided for judges, prosecutors and police officers.  

    A new national action plan on the prevention of sexual violence was currently being developed.  Twenty-six shelters were available for victims of sexual and gender-based violence in all territories of the State.  Ten million euros had been devoted to financing these shelters.  A new media campaign was being carried out on preventing violence against women.

    To increase access to primary healthcare, a new healthcare service network had been established that included mobile medical and psychiatric healthcare teams.  These teams covered a wide geographical area and included emergency helicopter and maritime services.  The Government had also increased the availability of telehealth services.  Each county had at least one hospital.  Croatia was close to the European Union average for the number of doctors per 100,000 inhabitants and the number of doctors was increasing.  The Government provided funds for residencies for young doctors.

    Follow-Up Questions by Committee Experts

    One Committee Expert welcomed indicators developed by the State party on measuring poverty, while another praised the State party’s various initiatives promoting access to housing.

    Committee Experts asked follow-up questions on progress in the implementation of the national strategy on reducing drug-related harm; measures to prevent house demolition and forced evictions of vulnerable groups, and remedies provided to affected persons; statistics on homelessness and the average period of stay in shelters; whether takeovers of unused units were temporary or permanent, and whether the Government planned to pay compensation to owners; how the State responded when people could not afford to pay utility bills or their mortgage; measures to prevent the discriminatory effects of reporting obligations required to receive health insurance; and plans to update poverty indicators from a multidimensional lens.

    Responses by the Delegation

    The delegation said that in 2023, the Government adopted the national strategy on addiction, which aimed to reduce harms and risks related to addiction.  Every year, it implemented over 300 intervention programmes related to addiction.  The Government primarily rehabilitated adults in the social welfare system, but some addicts were in the prison system.  Non-governmental organizations provided counselling and intervention services for addicts.  Around one-third of addicts in treatment were women.  The Government was developing measures to support women addicts and provide social housing for them.

    Under State guidelines on the provision of abortions, patients could demand terminations of pregnancy in all hospitals in the State.  In cases of conscientious objection from doctors, patients were referred to other doctors or institutions.  

    The act on compulsory health insurance provided the right to healthcare for persons under international protection and asylum seekers and their family members, as well as unaccompanied minors.  Many citizens who lived abroad used free telehealth services in Croatia, abusing the system.  This was why the obligation of reporting to authorities once every three months to obtain health insurance had been introduced.

    Croatia had adopted a strategy framework on the development of mental healthcare, which aimed to reduce the suicide rate and improve the mental health of children and workers in particular.

    Courts applied the caselaw of the European Court of Human Rights regarding evictions, so it was very difficult to forcefully evict people from their homes.  The Government was increasing fiscal pressures on unused properties and implementing measures that made long-term rent more beneficial for owners than short-term rent.  The State would also rent and sublet private unused apartments at a reduced price; it would not forcefully take these properties away from owners.  A new property tax had been developed to replace taxation on vacation homes.  All properties used for long-term rent were excluded from the tax.

    It was difficult to count homeless people who had not approached relevant service providers.  Homeless persons could receive personal identification documents by registering at a local institute for social welfare.  The Government was empowering homeless persons to gain employment.

    Questions by a Committee Expert

    ASLAN ABASHIDZE, Committee Expert and Member of the Taskforce for Croatia, asked for disaggregated data on school enrolment, completion and dropout rates at primary and secondary levels for the last 10 years.  Which ethnic groups had high dropout rates?  What progress had been made in promoting the inclusion of the Roma in the education system?  All children, including Roma children, needed to attend preschool education.  Who was responsible on collecting data on Roma children who were eligible to attend preschool?  How many Roma children had attended preschool over the past five years and how many had progressed to primary and secondary education?  

    What measures were in place to ensure that refugees and migrants had access to quality Croatian language courses and higher education?  Had a new programme been adopted to support these groups in 2025?  Were there specific measures to support Serbian children’s education?  There were reports of vandalism targeting Serbian monuments and Orthodox churches.  Had these incidents been investigated and violators held responsible?  How would the Government ensure that such violence did not occur in the future?

    Responses by the Delegation

    The delegation said the dropout rate in Croatia was around two per cent, which was around the lowest rate in the European Union.  There was a system that monitored students, but it did not record the national affiliation of students.  Data on Roma students had been gathered since 2008, however.  This data informed the Government’s activities for Roma students.  Around 70 per cent of Roma students attended secondary school; this was lower than the national average.  The national action plan on the inclusion of the Roma included activities encouraging education for Roma children, including scholarships for Roma pupils in secondary schools.  Annually, between 50 and 100 Roma children dropout out of school.  The number of Roma university students receiving scholarships had increased in recent years.  “Roma assistants” were employed in primary schools to support Roma children.  On average, around 400 Roma children were enrolled in kindergartens each year.  Local governments funded kindergarten education for Roma children.

    One year of preschool education was mandatory for all pupils.  The Government funded preschool programmes for each child.  Over the next three years, it would invest around 200 million euros in this public service.  Croatian language courses were provided to all students who did not speak Croatian, starting from primary level.

    Vandalism based on ethnicity was treated as a form of discrimination and a hate crime, and was punished with a harsher sentence.  The State party was cooperating with civil society organizations representing ethnic groups to prevent such incidents and bring perpetrators to justice.

    The Ministry of Culture and Media had secured funds to support the needs of national minorities.  Funds were being devoted to cultural associations, libraries and there were other measures of protecting the cultural heritage of minorities.  Public broadcasters were required to devote a portion of broadcasts to programmes for national minorities.  The Government also helped fund the cultural activities of persons with disabilities.

    Follow-Up Questions by Committee Experts

    Committee Experts asked follow-up questions on whether foreign students received free higher education; the number of foreign students in the State; steps taken to enhance inclusive education for persons with disabilities; whether indexation was used to calculate social assistance benefits; whether trade union rights were adequately granted to all workers, including police and military personnel; measures implemented to encourage reporting of racial discrimination offences and prevent such discrimination; the delegation’s response to reports of insufficient funding and will from authorities to address hate-related crimes; and statistics on crimes against Serbians.

    Responses by the Delegation

    The delegation said that in 2024, there were 531 foreign students enrolled in Croatian universities.  The Government had adopted guidelines on supporting children with disabilities, who were entitled to specially trained teaching assistants.

    Croatia used automatic indexation to calculate elderly benefits and pensions, based on cost-of-living indicators.  There was no index system for the guaranteed minimum benefit, which was increased once per year by the Government, considering various factors.  A project had been launched to better monitor poverty rates through the Central Population Register, which would be established this year.

    Trade unions in Croatia could create their own networks, participate in the drafting of legislation and national policies, and participate in parliamentary debates.  The Government was drafting an action plan to encourage all employers to conclude collective agreements.  The scope of certain collective agreements was extended by the State to prevent unfair competition or restrictions on workers’ rights.  Only active military personnel were restricted from forming trade unions in line with existing legislation; police officers could form and join unions.  Property used by trade unions was formerly owned by the State, but legislation that entered into force last week transferred ownership to a trade union fund.

    In 2023, the State party recorded 61 hate crimes against ethnic minorities.  This was a decrease from the 67 crimes reported in 2021.  Authorities needed to consider these as serious offences and respond appropriately.  The judicial academy provided training for judges and judicial workers on the prohibition of discrimination, hate crimes and hate speech, including anti-Semitism.  Thirteen workshops would be held in 2025.  Police officers were also involved in workshops on preventing anti-Semitism, hate speech and all forms of discrimination.

    Closing Remarks

    KARLA VANESSA LEMUS DE VÁSQUEZ, Committee Expert, Country Rapporteur and Lead Member of the Taskforce on Croatia, thanked the delegation for the information shared, which provided insight into the progress achieved and measures planned to give effect to the Covenant in Croatia.  The Committee’s aim was to ensure the full realisation of economic, social and cultural rights for all persons in Croatia.  She thanked all persons who had contributed to the successful dialogue.

    IVAN VIDIŠ, State Secretary, Ministry of Labour, Pension System, Family and Social Policy of Croatia and head of the delegation, said Croatia was making every effort to make progress.  The State party was passionate about its work, open about its challenges, and determined to address them.  Croatia had faced aggression in its past, and the Committee needed to consider the difficult path the country had travelled.  Economic, social and cultural rights were the cornerstone of the State party’s efforts.  The cost-of-living crisis was a major concern currently, but the State party’s measures supporting energy and other costs had lightened the burden for residents.  Croatia was facing a demographic decline, but incentives were in place to support a reversal of demographic trends.  Parliament had recently agreed on a declaration regarding the rights of older people, who made up an increasingly large portion of the population.  Mr. Vidiš thanked the Committee for its constructive approach to the dialogue.

     

    LAURA-MARIA CRACIUNEAN-TATU, Committee Chair, thanked the delegation for the open and constructive way in which it had participated in the dialogue.  The dialogue with Croatia would continue, as the Committee would select three follow-up recommendations that it called on the State party to address within 24 months.  It hoped that Croatia would continue to address the Committee’s recommendations with a constructive spirit.

     

    Produced by the United Nations Information Service in Geneva for use of the media; 
    not an official record. English and French versions of our releases are different as they are the product of two separate coverage teams that work independently.

     

     

    CESCR25.002E

    MIL OSI United Nations News –

    February 12, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: United Fire Group, Inc. Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2024 Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Fourth quarter net income of $1.21 per diluted share and adjusted operating income of $1.25 per diluted share; full year net income of $2.39 per diluted share and adjusted operating income of $2.56 per diluted share

    Fourth quarter 2024 highlights compared to fourth quarter 2023:(1)

    • Net income increased from $19.6 million to $31.4 million.
    • Net investment income increased 21.2% to $23.2 million.
    • Combined ratio improved 4.8 points to 94.4%; composed of an underlying loss ratio of 55.7%, catastrophe loss ratio of 1.6%, no prior year reserve development, and underwriting expense ratio of 37.1%.
    • Underlying combined ratio improved 1.6 points to 92.8%.
    • Net written premiums(2) increased 13% to $278.5 million.

    Full year 2024 highlights compared to full year 2023:(1)

    • Net income increased to $62.0 million.
    • Net investment income increased 37.5% to $82.0 million.
    • Combined ratio improved 10.1 points to 99.2%; composed of an underlying loss ratio of 57.9%, catastrophe loss ratio of 5.4%, no prior year reserve development and underwriting expense ratio of 35.9%.
    • Underlying combined ratio improved 3.3 points to 93.8%.
    • Net written premiums increased 15% to $1.2 billion.
    • Book value per share increased $1.76 to $30.80 as of December 31, 2024, compared to December 31, 2023.
    • Adjusted book value per share increased $1.95 to $33.64 as of December 31, 2024, compared to December 31, 2023.

    CEDAR RAPIDS, Iowa, Feb. 11, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — United Fire Group, Inc. (“UFG”) (Nasdaq: UFCS) today reported financial results for the three-month period ended December 31, 2024, with a consolidated net income of $31.4 million ($1.21 income per diluted share) and consolidated adjusted operating income of $1.25 per diluted share.

    “Our fourth quarter and full year results reflect the continued progress we are making in the execution of our strategic business plan,” said UFG President and CEO Kevin Leidwinger. “The actions we have taken over the past two years to deepen our underwriting expertise, evolve our capabilities, better align with our distribution partners and improve our investment returns are materializing in our results.

    “In 2024, we achieved the highest level of net written premiums in our company’s 79-year history. In addition, we produced the best annual combined ratio and highest adjusted operating income since 2015. These milestones reflect key steps on our journey to consistently deliver superior financial and operational performance.

    “In the fourth quarter, net written premiums grew 13% led by our core commercial and assumed reinsurance business. Core commercial growth was driven by average renewal increases of 11.9%, a substantial increase in new business production and stable retention. On a full year basis, net written premiums grew 15% to $1.2 billion.  

    “The fourth quarter combined ratio improved to 94.4%, the lowest in 11 quarters, while the full year combined ratio improved 10.1 points to 99.2%. The underlying loss ratio improved to 55.7% for the quarter and 57.9% for the year, reflecting the ongoing benefits of strong earned rate achievement exceeding loss trends and continued underwriting discipline resulting in improved frequency outcomes. Prior year reserve development remained neutral overall in the quarter while the impact from catastrophes was well below historical averages at 1.6% for the quarter and 5.4% for the year.

    “The fourth quarter and full year expense ratios were elevated due to investments in talent to deepen expertise across the company, accelerated development of our new policy administration system that is now poised for implementation in 2025, and increased performance-based compensation for employees and agents due to current year achievements.

    “Net investment income improved to $23.2 million in the fourth quarter and $82.0 million for the full year. Fixed maturity income increased to $70 million for the year as new money yields remained strong. We also benefited from improved valuations on our limited partnership portfolio for the full year. We expect the fixed maturity portfolio to generate over $80 million of annualized fixed maturity income, with potential for further improvement from future reinvestment at higher rates. 

    “Reported book value per share decreased slightly in the fourth quarter due to a change in after-tax unrealized loss caused by increased interest rates. Our improved annual earnings and return on equity of 8.2% allowed adjusted book value per share to grow $1.95 for the year to $33.64.

    “During the fourth quarter, we successfully resolved the rating errors in our core commercial business that were identified in the second quarter, resulting in no financial impact to the company. As a result, we have reversed the $3.2 million contingent liability established in the second quarter.

    “While 2024 marked a return to underwriting profitability for UFG, our work is far from finished. We remain confident in our ability to execute the business plan for improved performance in the years ahead and are grateful for our people and their dedication to delivering the deep expertise, specialized capabilities, personal relationships and responsive service that our partners and policyholders value.

    “Finally, our hearts go out to all those impacted by the devastating wildfires in Southern California. Our claims and risk control professionals continue to assist policyholders in the wake of the destruction. At this time, we estimate losses in the range of $7 million to $10 million from this tragic event.”

    (1) Underlying loss ratio, underlying combined ratio and adjusted book value per share are non-GAAP financial measures. See Definitions of Non-GAAP Information and Reconciliations to Comparable GAAP Measures for additional information.
    (2) Net written premiums is a performance measure reflecting the amount charged for insurance policy contracts issued and recognized on an annualized basis at the effective date of the policy. See Certain Performance Measures for additional information.

    Consolidated Financial Highlights:

    Consolidated Financial Highlights(1)
    (Unaudited) Three Months Ended December 31,   Twelve Months Ended December 31,
    (In thousands, except per share data)   2024       2023       2024       2023  
    Net earned premiums $ 308,137     $ 264,366     $ 1,176,750     $ 1,034,587  
    Net written premiums   278,529       246,830       1,231,470       1,066,901  
                   
    Combined ratio:              
    Net loss ratio   57.3 %     64.8 %     63.3 %     74.4 %
    Underwriting expense ratio   37.1 %     34.4 %     35.9 %     34.9 %
    Combined ratio   94.4 %     99.2 %     99.2 %     109.3 %
                   
    Additional ratios:              
    Net loss ratio   57.3 %     64.8 %     63.3 %     74.4 %
    Catastrophes   1.6 %     1.5 %     5.4 %     6.2 %
    Reserve development   — %     3.3 %     — %     6.0 %
    Underlying loss ratio (non-GAAP)   55.7 %     60.0 %     57.9 %     62.2 %
    Underwriting expense ratio   37.1 %     34.4 %     35.9 %     34.9 %
    Underlying combined ratio (non-GAAP)   92.8 %     94.4 %     93.8 %     97.1 %
                   
    Net investment income $ 23,156     $ 19,098     $ 81,986     $ 59,606  
    Net investment gains (losses)   (1,318 )     3,855       (5,429 )     1,274  
    Other income (loss)(2)   300       (1,039 )     (9,388 )     (4,983 )
                   
    Net income (loss) $ 31,442     $ 19,608     $ 61,957     $ (29,700 )
    Adjusted operating income (loss)   32,483       16,564       66,246       (30,706 )
                   
    Net income (loss) per diluted share $ 1.21     $ 0.77     $ 2.39     $ (1.18 )
    Adjusted operating income (loss) per diluted share   1.25       0.65       2.56       (1.22 )
                   
    Return on equity(3)           8.2 %     (4.0 )%
                       

    (1) Underlying loss ratio, underlying combined ratio and adjusted operating income (loss) are non-GAAP financial measures. See Definitions of Non-GAAP Information and Reconciliations to Comparable GAAP Measures for additional information.
    (2) Other income (loss) is comprised of other income (loss), interest expense and other non-underwriting expenses.
    (3) Return on equity is calculated by dividing annualized net income by average stockholders’ equity, which is calculated using a simple average of the beginning and ending balances for the period.

    Total Property & Casualty Underwriting Results

    Fourth quarter 2024 results:
    (All comparisons vs. fourth quarter 2023, unless noted otherwise)

    Net written premiums and net earned premiums increased by 13% and 17%, respectively, in the fourth quarter of 2024, led by core commercial and assumed reinsurance business. Commercial lines net written premiums excluding surety and specialty increased 13%, supported by increased pricing with an overall increase in average renewal premiums of 11.9%. Rate increases accounted for 10.8% while exposure increases contributed an additional 1.0%. Excluding the workers’ compensation line of business, the overall average increase in renewal premiums was 12.9%, with 11.7% from rate increases and 1.1% from exposure changes.

    The combined ratio for the fourth quarter of 2024 was 94.4%, improving 4.8 points from 99.2% driven by improvement in the underlying loss ratio. Prior year reserve development, excluding catastrophe losses, was neutral for the fourth quarter of 2024 compared to 3.3% of unfavorable development in the fourth quarter of 2023. Catastrophe losses added 1.6 points to the combined ratio, an increase of 0.1 points and below both the five-year and 10-year historical averages. The underlying loss ratio of 55.7% improved 4.3 points, reflecting improvement from a combination of rate achievement, continued favorable claim frequency, and lower large loss activity, most notably in the surety portfolio, partially offset by an increase in the umbrella loss ratio, reflecting continued uncertainty from the impact of social inflation. The underwriting expense ratio of 37.1% increased 2.7 points driven by increased performance-based compensation for employees and agents due to current year achievements.

    Full year 2024 results:
    (All comparisons vs. full year 2023, unless noted otherwise)

    Net written premiums and net earned premiums increased by 15% and 14%, respectively, led by core commercial, assumed reinsurance and surety. Commercial lines net written premiums excluding surety and specialty increased 13%, supported by increased pricing with an overall increase in average renewal premiums of 11.8%. Rate increases accounted for 10.1% while exposure increases contributed an additional 1.6%. Excluding the workers’ compensation line of business, the overall average increase in renewal premiums was 12.9%, with 11.2% from rate increases and 1.6% from exposure changes.

    For the full year, the combined ratio was 99.2%, improving 10.1 points from 109.3% driven by improvement in all components of the loss ratio. Prior year reserve development, excluding catastrophe losses, was neutral for the full year 2024 compared to 6.0% of unfavorable development in the full year 2023. Catastrophe losses added 5.4 points to the combined ratio, an improvement of 0.8 points and below both the five-year and 10-year historical averages. The underlying loss ratio of 57.9% improved 4.3 points, reflecting improvement from a combination of underwriting actions, increased pricing, expense management, lower frequency trends and lower large loss activity in the property and surety lines of business, partially offset by an increase in the umbrella loss ratio. The underwriting expense ratio of 35.9% increased 1.0 point primarily due to investments in talent to deepen expertise across the company; accelerated development of our new policy administration system that is now poised for implementation in 2025; and increased performance-based compensation for employees and agents due to current year achievements.

    Investment Results

    Fourth quarter 2024 results:
    (All comparisons vs. fourth quarter 2023, unless noted otherwise)

    Net investment income was $23.2 million for the fourth quarter of 2024, an increase of $4.1 million or 21.2%. Income from the fixed maturity portfolio increased by $4.8 million due to portfolio management actions and investing at higher interest rates. Other investment income increased by $1.2 million driven by $1.1 million of interest on cash and cash equivalents. Income on other long-term investments decreased $1.3 million driven by better returns in the fourth quarter of 2023. Dividends on equity securities decreased $0.5 million due to the strategic re-allocation into fixed maturities.

    Full year 2024 results:
    (All comparisons vs. full year 2023, unless noted otherwise)

    Net investment income was $82.0 million for the full year 2024, an increase of $22.4 million or 37.5%. Interest on fixed maturities was up $13.5 million or 23.9% as a result of portfolio management actions, investing at higher rates, and the strategic re-allocation of equity securities into fixed maturities, which resulted in a decrease in dividend income of $3.2 million. Income on other long-term investments was $8.0 million in 2024 compared to the depressed income of zero for 2023, as the valuation of the investments in limited liability partnerships varies from period to period due to the current market conditions. Other investment income increased $5.6 million, driven by $4.8 million of interest on cash and cash equivalents.

    Investment Results
    (Unaudited) Three Months Ended December 31,   Twelve Months Ended December 31,
    (In thousands)   2024       2023       2024       2023  
    Investment income:              
    Interest on fixed maturities $ 19,877     $ 15,051     $ 69,703     $ 56,243  
    Dividends on equity securities   —       481       341       3,548  
    Income (loss) on other long-term investments   2,150       3,460       7,939       (31 )
    Other   3,692       2,456       14,951       9,324  
    Total investment income $ 25,719     $ 21,448     $ 92,934     $ 69,084  
    Less investment expenses   2,562       2,350       10,947       9,478  
    Net investment income $ 23,157     $ 19,098     $ 81,987     $ 59,606  
                   
    Average yields on fixed income securities pre-tax(1)   4.15 %     3.39 %     3.73 %     3.28 %
    (1) Fixed income securities yield excluding net unrealized investment gains/losses and expenses.
     

    Balance Sheet

      December 31, 2024   December 31, 2023
    (In thousands) (unaudited)    
    Invested assets $                  2,093,094     $ 1,886,494  
    Cash                          200,949       102,046  
    Total assets                       3,488,469       3,144,190  
    Losses and loss settlement expenses                       1,796,782       1,638,755  
    Total liabilities                       2,706,938       2,410,445  
    Net unrealized investment gains (losses), after-tax                           (72,241 )     (66,967 )
    Total stockholders’ equity                          781,531       733,745  
           
    Book value per share $                          30.80     $ 29.04  
    Adjusted book value per share(1)                               33.64       31.69  
    (1) Adjusted book value per share is a non-GAAP financial measure. See Definitions of Non-GAAP Information and Reconciliations to Comparable GAAP Measures for additional information.
     

    The company’s book value per share was $30.80, an increase of $1.76 per share, or 6.1%, from December 31, 2023. This increase is primarily related to an increase in net income, partially offset with an increase in net unrealized losses on fixed maturity securities and shareholder dividends during the 12-month period ended December 31, 2024.

    Capital Management

    During the fourth quarter of 2024, the company declared and paid a $0.16 per share cash dividend to shareholders of record as of November 29, 2024. UFG has paid a quarterly dividend every quarter since March 1968.

    Earnings Call Access Information

    An earnings call will be held at 9:00 a.m. CT on Wednesday, February 12, 2025, to allow securities analysts, shareholders and other interested parties the opportunity to hear management discuss the company’s fourth quarter of 2024 results.

    Teleconference: Dial-in information for the call is toll-free 1-844-492-3723 (international 1-412-542-4184). The event will be archived and available for digital replay through February 19, 2025. The replay access information is toll-free 1-877-344-7529 (international 1-412-317-0088); conference ID no. 4765665.

    Webcast: An audio webcast of the teleconference can be accessed at the company’s investor relations page at https://ir.ufginsurance.com/event/ or https://event.choruscall.com/mediaframe/webcast.html?webcastid=j4u0yn8Q. The archived audio webcast will be available for one year.

    Transcript: A transcript of the teleconference will be available on the company’s website soon after the completion of the teleconference.

    About UFG

    Founded in 1946 as United Fire & Casualty Company, UFG, through its insurance company subsidiaries, is engaged in the business of writing property and casualty insurance.

    The company is licensed as a property and casualty insurer in all 50 states and the District of Columbia, and is represented by approximately 1,000 independent agencies. A.M. Best Company assigns a rating of “A-” (Excellent) for members of the United Fire & Casualty Group. For more information about UFG, visit www.ufginsurance.com.

    Contact:

    Investor Relations
    Email: ir@unitedfiregroup.com

    Media Inquiries
    Email: news@unitedfiregroup.com

    Disclosure of Forward-Looking Statements

    This release may contain forward-looking statements about our operations, anticipated performance and other similar matters. The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor under the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements are not historical facts and involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ from those expected and/or projected. Such forward-looking statements are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections about the company, the industry in which we operate, and beliefs and assumptions made by management. Words such as “expect(s),” “anticipate(s),” “intend(s),” “plan(s),” “believe(s),” “continue(s),” “seek(s),” “estimate(s),” “goal(s),” “remain(s) optimistic,” “target(s),” “forecast(s),” “project(s),” “predict(s),” “should,” “could,” “may,” “will,” “might,” “hope,” “can” and other words and terms of similar meaning or expression in connection with a discussion of future operations, financial performance or financial condition, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed in such forward-looking statements. Information concerning factors that could cause actual outcomes and results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements is contained in Part I, Item 1A “Risk Factors” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023 (“2023 Annual Report”), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on February 29, 2024. The risks identified in our 2023 Annual Report and in our other SEC filings are representative of the risks, uncertainties, and assumptions that could cause actual outcomes and results to differ materially from what is expressed in the forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this release or as of the date they are made. Except as required under the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations of the SEC, we do not have any intention or obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise, except as required by law. In addition, future dividend payments are within the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on numerous factors, including our financial condition, our capital requirements and other factors that our Board of Directors considers relevant.

    Definitions of Non-GAAP Information and Reconciliations to Comparable GAAP Measures

    The company prepares its financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). Management uses certain non-GAAP financial measures to evaluate its operations and profitability. Management also believes that disclosure of certain non-GAAP financial measures enhances investor understanding of our financial performance. Non-GAAP financial measures disclosed in this report include: adjusted operating income, underlying loss ratio, underlying combined ratio, and adjusted book value per share. The company has provided the following definitions and reconciliations of the non-GAAP financial measures:

    Adjusted operating income: Adjusted operating income is calculated by excluding net investment gains and losses, after applicable federal and state income taxes from net income (loss). Management believes adjusted operating income is a meaningful measure for evaluating insurance company performance and a useful supplement to GAAP information because it better represents the normal, ongoing performance of our business. Investors and equity analysts who invest in and report on the insurance industry and the company generally focus on this metric in their analyses.

    Net Income Reconciliation
    (Unaudited) Three Months Ended December 31,   Twelve Months Ended December 31,
    (In thousands)   2024       2023       2024       2023  
    Income statement data              
    Net income (loss) $            31,442     $ 19,608     $           61,957     $ (29,700 )
    Less: after-tax net investment gains (losses)                (1,041 )     3,044                   (4,289 )     1,006  
    Adjusted operating income (loss) $            32,483     $ 16,564     $           66,246     $ (30,706 )
    Diluted earnings per share data              
    Net income (loss) $                1.21     $ 0.77     $               2.39     $ (1.18 )
    Less: after-tax net investment gains (losses)                   (0.04 )     0.12                      (0.17 )     0.04  
    Adjusted operating income (loss) $                1.25     $ 0.65     $               2.56     $ (1.22 )
                                   

    Underlying loss ratio and underlying combined ratio: Underlying loss ratio represents the net loss ratio less the impacts of catastrophes and non-catastrophe prior year reserve development. The underlying combined ratio represents the combined ratio less the impacts of catastrophes and non-catastrophe prior year reserve development. The company believes that the underlying loss ratio and underlying combined ratio are meaningful measures to understand the underlying trends in the core business in the current accident year, removing the volatility of prior year impacts and catastrophes. Management believes separate discussions on catastrophe losses and prior year reserve development are important to understanding how the company is managing catastrophe risk and in identifying developments in longer-tailed business.

    Prior year reserve development is the increase (unfavorable) or decrease (favorable) in incurred loss and loss adjustment expense at the valuation dates for losses which occurred in previous calendar years. This measure excludes development on catastrophe losses.

    Catastrophe losses is an operational measure which utilizes the designations of the Insurance Services Office (“ISO”) and is reported with losses and loss adjustment expense amounts net of reinsurance recoverables, unless specified otherwise. In addition to ISO catastrophes, we also include as catastrophes those events, which may include U.S. or international losses, that we believe are, or will be, material to our operations, either in amount or in number of claims made. Catastrophes are not predictable and are unique in terms of timing and financial impact. While management estimates catastrophe losses as incurred, due to the inherently unique nature of catastrophe losses, the impact in a reporting period is inclusive of catastrophes that occurred in the reporting period, as well as development on catastrophes that have occurred in prior periods.

    Adjusted book value per share: Adjusted book value per share is calculated by dividing shareholders’ equity, excluding net unrealized investment gains and losses, net of tax, by the number of common shares outstanding. Management believes adjusted book value per share is a meaningful measure for evaluating the company’s net worth that is primarily attributable to our business operations, because it removes the effect of changing prices on invested assets that can fluctuate from period to period. Book value per share is the most directly comparable GAAP measure.

    Book Value Per Share Reconciliation
    (Unaudited) As of
    (In thousands) December 31, 2024   December 31, 2023
    Shareholders’ equity $                      781,531     $ 733,745  
    Less: Net unrealized investment gains (losses), net of tax                           (72,241 )     (66,967 )
    Shareholders’ equity, excluding net unrealized investment gains (losses), net of tax $                      853,772     $ 800,712  
           
    Common shares outstanding (basic)                             25,378       25,270  
    Book value per share $                           30.80     $ 29.04  
    Adjusted book value per share                               33.64       31.69  
                   

    Certain Performance Measures

    The company uses the following measure to evaluate its financial performance. Management believes a discussion of this measure provides financial statement users with a better understanding of the company’s results of operations. The company has provided the following definition:

    Net written premiums: Net written premiums is frequently used by industry analysts and other recognized reporting sources to facilitate comparisons of the performance of insurance companies. Net written premiums is the amount charged for insurance policy contracts issued and recognized on an annualized basis at the effective date of the policy. Management believes net written premiums is a meaningful measure for evaluating insurance company sales performance and geographical expansion efforts. Net written premiums for an insurance company consists of direct premiums written and premiums assumed, less premiums ceded. Net earned premiums is calculated on a pro-rata basis over the terms of the respective policies. Unearned premium reserves are established for the portion of written premiums applicable to the unexpired terms of the insurance policies in force. The difference between net earned premiums and net written premiums is the change in unearned premiums and the change in prepaid reinsurance premiums.

    Supplemental Tables

    Income Statement
    (Unaudited) Three Months Ended December 31,   Twelve Months Ended December 31,
    (In thousands)   2024       2023       2024       2023  
    Revenues              
    Net earned premiums $         308,137     $ 264,366     $      1,176,750     $ 1,034,587  
    Net investment income                23,156       19,098                    81,986       59,606  
    Net investment gains (losses)                (1,318 )     3,855                    (5,429 )     1,274  
    Other income (loss)                  3,200       —                            —       —  
    Total revenues $         333,175     $ 287,319     $      1,253,307     $ 1,095,467  
                   
    Benefits, losses and expenses              
    Losses and loss settlement expenses $         176,486     $ 171,289     $         744,605     $ 769,414  
    Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs                76,834       63,291                 281,338       244,991  
    Other underwriting expenses                37,410       27,569                 140,942       115,800  
    Interest expense                  2,481       869                      7,281       3,260  
    Other non-underwriting expenses                     419       170                      2,107       1,723  
    Total benefits, losses and expenses $         293,630     $ 263,188     $      1,176,273     $ 1,135,188  
                   
    Income (loss) before income taxes $           39,545     $ 24,131     $           77,034     $ (39,721 )
    Federal income tax expense (benefit)                  8,103       4,523                    15,077       (10,021 )
    Net income (loss) $           31,442     $ 19,608     $           61,957     $ (29,700 )
                                   
    Net Written Premiums by Line of Business
    (Unaudited) Three Months Ended December 31,   Twelve Months Ended December 31,
    (In thousands)   2024       2023       2024       2023  
    Net written premiums(1)              
    Commercial lines:              
    Other liability(2) $            90,508     $ 79,393     $         369,454     $ 325,900  
    Fire and allied lines(3)                54,203       51,742                  253,796       249,029  
    Automobile                53,776       46,667                  258,257       218,710  
    Workers’ compensation                14,011       10,530                    61,838       49,128  
    Surety(4)                10,013       11,964                    52,524       47,564  
    Miscellaneous                  3,201       1,356                    13,086       4,776  
    Total commercial lines $         225,712     $ 201,652     $      1,008,955     $ 895,107  
                   
    Personal lines:              
    Fire and allied lines(5) $              3,804     $ 136     $            14,201     $ 4,545  
    Automobile                      764       —                      2,449       —  
    Miscellaneous                        —       1                              5       14  
    Total personal lines $              4,568     $ 137     $            16,655     $ 4,559  
    Assumed reinsurance(6)                48,249       45,041                  205,860       167,236  
    Total $         278,529     $ 246,830     $      1,231,470     $ 1,066,901  
    (1) Net written premiums is a performance measure reflecting the amount charged for insurance policy contracts issued and recognized on an annualized basis at the effective date of the policy. See Certain Performance Measures for additional information.
    (2) Commercial lines “Other liability” is business insurance covering bodily injury and property damage arising from general business operations, accidents on the insured’s premises and products manufactured or sold.
    (3) Commercial lines “Fire and allied lines” includes fire, allied lines, commercial multiple peril and inland marine.
    (4) Commercial lines “Surety” previously referred to as “Fidelity and surety.”
    (5) Personal lines “Fire and allied lines” includes fire, allied lines, homeowners and inland marine.
    (6) Assumed reinsurance includes Funds at Lloyd’s
     
    Net Earned Premiums, Net Losses and Loss Settlement Expenses and Net Loss Ratio by Line of Business
    Three Months Ended December 31,   2024       2023  
    (In thousands, except ratios)     Net Losses           Net Losses    
        and Loss           and Loss    
    Net   Settlement   Net   Net   Settlement   Net
    Earned   Expenses   Loss   Earned   Expenses   Loss
    (Unaudited) Premiums   Incurred   Ratio   Premiums   Incurred   Ratio
    Commercial lines                      
    Other liability $     91,016     $       82,052       90.2 %   $ 83,239     $ 54,991       66.1 %
    Fire and allied lines          62,019               16,515       26.6       61,869       31,994       51.7  
    Automobile          63,276               28,893       45.7       54,068       39,792       73.6  
    Workers’ compensation          14,914                 8,233       55.2       12,626       13,908       110.2  
    Surety          15,537                   (179 )     (1.2 )     12,311       6,591       53.5  
    Miscellaneous            3,223                     611       19.0       1,180       663       56.2  
    Total commercial lines $   249,985     $    136,125       54.5 %   $ 225,293     $ 147,939       65.7 %
                           
    Personal lines                      
    Fire and allied lines $        3,814     $         5,110       134.0 %   $ 165     $ (229 )     (138.8 )%
    Automobile               639                     424       66.4 %     —       (511 )     NM  
    Miscellaneous                    2                         4       NM       4       66       NM  
    Total personal lines $        4,455     $         5,538       124.3 %   $ 169     $ (674 )     (398.8 )%
    Assumed reinsurance          53,697               34,823       64.9       38,904       24,024       61.8  
    Total $   308,137     $    176,486       57.3 %   $ 264,366     $ 171,289       64.8 %
    NM = Not meaningful
     
    Net Earned Premiums, Net Losses and Loss Settlement Expenses and Net Loss Ratio by Line of Business
    Twelve Months Ended December 31,   2024       2023  
    (In thousands, except ratios)     Net Losses           Net Losses    
        and Loss           and Loss    
    Net   Settlement   Net   Net   Settlement   Net
    Earned   Expenses   Loss   Earned   Expenses   Loss
    (Unaudited) Premiums   Incurred   Ratio   Premiums   Incurred   Ratio
    Commercial lines                      
    Other liability $    343,027     $    283,034       82.5 %   $ 320,762     $ 249,106       77.7 %
    Fire and allied lines        252,142             125,807       49.9       244,674       183,533       75.0  
    Automobile        239,964             138,517       57.7       208,874       176,667       84.6  
    Workers’ compensation          54,815               37,524       68.5       53,039       33,224       62.6  
    Surety          60,285               14,812       24.6       39,922       22,259       55.8  
    Miscellaneous             9,802                 5,742       58.6       2,702       940       34.8  
    Total commercial lines $    960,035     $    605,436       63.1 %   $ 869,973     $ 665,729       76.5 %
                           
    Personal lines                      
    Fire and allied lines $      14,237     $         8,325       58.5 %   $ 4,733     $ 3,402       71.9 %
    Automobile             1,214                     732       60.3 %     —       (837 )     NM  
    Miscellaneous                  10                     197       NM       22       (82 )     NM  
    Total personal lines $      15,461     $         9,254       59.9 %   $ 4,755     $ 2,483       52.2 %
    Assumed reinsurance        201,254             129,915       64.6       159,859       101,202       63.3  
    Total $ 1,176,750     $    744,605       63.3 %   $ 1,034,587     $ 769,414       74.4 %
                           

    The MIL Network –

    February 12, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: BlackLine Announces Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2024 Financial Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    LOS ANGELES, Feb. 11, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — BlackLine, Inc. (Nasdaq: BL), today announced financial results for the fourth quarter and full year ended December 31, 2024.

    “We believe our recent user conference and accelerating innovation are creating momentum for BlackLine,” said Owen Ryan, Co-CEO of BlackLine. “We’re making progress on our key Investor Day initiatives, including the rollout of Studio360, advancement of our public sector opportunity, and expansion of our industry-specific strategy. While we recognize the work ahead to achieve our full vision, our strategic investments are building a solid foundation for future growth.”

    “By focusing our innovation on the evolving needs of the Office of the CFO, we continue to unlock new market opportunities and enhance our strategic position,” said Therese Tucker, Co-CEO of BlackLine. “Through our Studio360 platform along with AI-powered solutions and capabilities, we’re delivering customer-focused innovation that we believe drive both our company’s financial performance and our customers’ ability to achieve greater operational efficiency across their finance and accounting organizations.”

    Fourth Quarter 2024 Financial Highlights

    • Total GAAP revenues of $169.5 million, an increase of 9% compared to the fourth quarter of 2023.
    • GAAP operating margin of 3.7%, compared to 8.2% in the fourth quarter of 2023.
    • Non-GAAP operating margin of 18.1%, compared to 24.8% in the fourth quarter of 2023.
    • GAAP net income attributable to BlackLine of $56.4 million, or $0.79 per diluted share compared to GAAP net income attributable to BlackLine of $22.1 million, or $0.32 per diluted share in the fourth quarter of 2023.
    • Non-GAAP net income attributable to BlackLine of $34.6 million, or $0.47 per diluted share compared to non-GAAP net income attributable to BlackLine of $51.5 million, or $0.69 per diluted share in the fourth quarter of 2023.
    • Operating cash flow of $43.8 million, compared to $42.2 million in the fourth quarter of 2023.
    • Free cash flow of $36.5 million, compared to $35.3 million in the fourth quarter of 2023.

    Full Year 2024 Financial Highlights

    • Total GAAP revenues of $653.3 million, an increase of 11% from 2023.
    • GAAP operating margin of 2.8%, compared to 2.4% in 2023.
    • Non-GAAP operating margin of 19.4%, compared to 16.5% in 2023.
    • GAAP net income attributable to BlackLine of $161.2 million, or $1.45 per diluted share compared to GAAP net income attributable to BlackLine of $52.8 million, or $0.81 per diluted share in 2023.
    • Non-GAAP net income attributable to BlackLine of $162.1 million, or $2.18 per diluted share compared to non-GAAP net income attributable to BlackLine of $145.2 million, or $1.96 per diluted share in 2023.
    • Operating cash flow of $190.8 million, compared to $126.6 million from 2023.
    • Free cash flow of $164.0 million, compared to $99.0 million from 2023.

    Fourth Quarter Key Metrics and Recent Business Highlights

    • BlackLine had a total of 4,443 customers at December 31, 2024.
    • Expanded the Company’s user base to 397,477 users at December 31, 2024.
    • Achieved a dollar-based net revenue retention rate of 102% at December 31, 2024.
    • Launched Studio360 Platform to drive future-ready financial operations for the Office of the CFO.
    • Recognized as a Leader in the 2024 IDC MarketScape for Worldwide Accounts Receivable Automation Applications for the Enterprise.
    • Recognized as Most Innovative FinTech Solution by the 2024 Tech Ascension Awards.
    • Appointed Stuart Van Houten as Chief Commercial Officer.
    • Welcomed Philippe Omer-Decugis as Senior Vice President and General Manager for Europe.
    • Announced 2024 Modern Accounting Award Winners at BeyondTheBlack.
    • Announced the planned retirement of BlackLine’s Chief Financial Officer and named successor.

    The financial results included in this press release are preliminary and subject to final review. Financial results will not be final until BlackLine files its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period. Information about BlackLine’s use of non-GAAP financial measures is provided below under “Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures.”

    Financial Outlook

    First Quarter 2025

    • Total GAAP revenue is expected to be in the range of $166 million to $168 million.
    • Non-GAAP operating margin is expected to be in the range of 16.5% to 17.5%.
    • Non-GAAP net income attributable to BlackLine is expected to be in the range of $28 million to $30 million, or $0.36 to $0.39 per share on 77.7 million diluted weighted average shares outstanding.

    Full Year 2025

    • Total GAAP revenue is expected to be in the range of $699 million to $705 million.
    • Non-GAAP operating margin is expected to be in the range of 21.0% to 22.0%.
    • Non-GAAP net income attributable to BlackLine is expected to be in the range of $155 million to $165 million, or $1.97 to $2.10 per share on 78.5 million diluted weighted average shares outstanding.

    Guidance for non-GAAP operating margin, non-GAAP net income attributable to BlackLine, and non-GAAP net income attributable to BlackLine per share excludes specified items from the corresponding GAAP financial measures as outlined below under “Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures” and as detailed in the reconciliations of non-GAAP measures for historical periods. Reconciliations of non-GAAP operating margin, non-GAAP net income attributable to BlackLine, and non-GAAP net income attributable to BlackLine per share guidance to the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measures are not available on a forward-looking basis without unreasonable efforts due to the unpredictability and complexity of the charges excluded from these non-GAAP financial measures. The Company expects the variability of the above items could have a significant, and potentially unpredictable, impact on its future GAAP operating margin, net income attributable to BlackLine, and net income attributable to BlackLine per share.

    Quarterly Conference Call

    BlackLine will hold a conference call to discuss its fourth quarter and full year 2024 results at 2:00 p.m. Pacific time on Tuesday, February 11, 2025. A live audio webcast will be accessible on BlackLine’s investor relations website at https://investors.blackline.com. Participants can preregister for the conference call. A replay of the webcast will be available at https://investors.blackline.com for 12 months. BlackLine has used, and intends to continue to use, its Investor Relations website as a means of disclosing material non-public information and for complying with its disclosure obligations under Regulation FD.

    About BlackLine

    BlackLine (Nasdaq: BL), the future-ready platform for the Office of the CFO, drives digital finance transformation by empowering organizations with accurate, efficient, and intelligent financial operations.

    BlackLine’s comprehensive platform addresses mission-critical processes, including record-to-report and invoice-to-cash, enabling unified and accurate data, streamlined and optimized processes, and real-time insight through visibility, automation, and AI. BlackLine’s proven, collaborative approach ensures continuous transformation, delivering immediate impact and sustained value. With a proven track record of innovation, industry-leading R&D investment, and world-class security practices, more than 4,400 customers across multiple industries partner with BlackLine to lead their organizations into the future.

    For more information, please visit blackline.com.

    Forward-looking Statements

    This release and the conference call referenced above contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “expect,” “plan,” anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “intend,” “potential,” “would,” “continue,” “ongoing” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. Forward-looking statements in this release and quarterly conference call include, but are not limited to, statements regarding BlackLine’s future financial and operational performance, including, without limitation, GAAP and non-GAAP guidance for the first quarter and full year of 2025, the impact of progress against certain key initiatives, our expectations for our business, including the demand environment, BlackLine’s addressable market, market position and pipeline, our international growth, and our relationships with our customers and partners, including opportunities to expand those relationships.

    Any forward-looking statements contained in this press release or the quarterly conference call are based upon BlackLine’s historical performance and its current plans, estimates and expectations and are not a representation that such plans, estimates, or expectations will be achieved. Forward-looking statements are based on information available at the time those statements are made and/or management’s good-faith beliefs and assumptions as of that time with respect to future events, and are subject to risks and uncertainties. If any of these risks or uncertainties materialize or if any assumptions prove incorrect, actual performance or results may differ materially from those expressed in or suggested by the forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to risks related to the Company’s ability to attract new customers and expand sales to existing customers; the extent to which customers renew their subscription agreements or increase the number of users; the impact of current and future economic uncertainty and other unfavorable conditions in the Company’s industry or the global economy, the Company’s ability to manage growth and scale effectively, including entry into new geographies; the Company’s ability to provide successful enhancements, new features and modifications to its software solutions; the Company’s ability to develop new products and software solutions and the success of any new product and service introductions; the Company’s ability to effectively incorporate artificial intelligence and machine learning technologies (AI/ML) into its platform and business and the potential reputational harm or legal liability that may result from the use of AI/ML solutions and features; the success of the Company’s strategic relationships with technology vendors and business process outsourcers, channel partners and alliance partners; any breaches of the Company’s security measures; a disruption in the Company’s hosting network infrastructure; costs and reputational harm that could result from defects in the Company’s solutions; the loss of any key employees; continued strong demand for the Company’s software in the United States, Europe, Asia Pacific, and Latin America; the Company’s ability to compete as the financial close management provider for organizations of all sizes; the timing and success of solutions offered by competitors; including competitors’ ability to incorporate AI/ML into products and offerings more quickly or successfully; changes in the proportion of the Company’s customer base that is comprised of enterprise or mid-sized organizations; the Company’s ability to expand and effectively manage its sales teams and their performance and productivity; fluctuations in our financial results due to long and increasingly variable sales cycles, failure to protect the Company’s intellectual property; the Company’s ability to integrate acquired businesses and technologies successfully or achieve the expected benefits of such transactions; unpredictable and uncertain macro and regional economic conditions; seasonality; changes in current tax or accounting rules; cyber attacks and the risk that the Company’s security measures may not be sufficient to secure its customer or confidential data adequately; acts of terrorism or other vandalism, war or natural disasters including the effects of climate change; the impact of any determination of deficiencies or weaknesses in our internal controls and processes; and other risks and uncertainties described in the other filings we make with the Securities and Exchange Commission from time to time, including the risks described under the heading “Risk Factors” in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2024 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 8, 2024. Additional information will also be set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024. Forward-looking statements should not be read as a guarantee of future performance or results, and you should not place undue reliance on such statements. Except as required by law, we do not undertake any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise. All of the information in this press release is subject to completion of our quarterly review process.

    Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures

    To supplement its consolidated financial statements, which are prepared and presented in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, BlackLine has provided in this release and the quarterly conference call held on February 11, 2025, certain financial measures that have not been prepared in accordance with GAAP defined as “non-GAAP financial measures,” which include (i) non-GAAP gross profit and non-GAAP gross margin, (ii) non-GAAP operating expenses, (iii) non-GAAP operating income (loss) and non-GAAP operating margin, (iv) non-GAAP net income (loss) attributable to BlackLine, Inc., (v) diluted non-GAAP net income (loss) attributable to BlackLine, Inc. per share, and (vi) free cash flow.

    BlackLine’s management uses these non-GAAP financial measures internally in analyzing its financial results and believes they are useful to investors, as a supplement to the corresponding GAAP measures, in evaluating BlackLine’s ongoing operational performance and trends and in comparing its financial measures with other companies in the same industry, many of which present similar non-GAAP financial measures to help investors understand the operational performance of their businesses. However, it is important to note that the particular items BlackLine excludes from, or includes in, its non-GAAP financial measures may differ from the items excluded from, or included in, similar non-GAAP financial measures used by other companies in the same industry. Non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered in isolation from, or as a substitute for, financial information prepared in accordance with GAAP. Investors are encouraged to review the reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to their most directly comparable GAAP financial measures. A reconciliation of the non-GAAP financial measures to such GAAP measures has been provided in the tables included as part of this press release.

    Non-GAAP Gross Profit and Non-GAAP Gross Margin. Non-GAAP gross profit is defined as GAAP revenues less GAAP cost of revenue adjusted for amortization of acquired developed technology, stock-based compensation, and transaction-related costs (including, but not limited to, accounting, legal, and advisory fees related to the transaction, as well as transaction-related retention bonuses). Non-GAAP gross margin is defined as non-GAAP gross profit divided by GAAP revenues. BlackLine believes that presenting non-GAAP gross profit and non-GAAP gross margin is useful to investors as it eliminates the impact of certain non-cash expenses and allows a direct comparison between periods.

    Non-GAAP Operating Expenses. Non-GAAP operating expenses include (a) non-GAAP sales and marketing expense, (b) non-GAAP research and development expense, and (c) non-GAAP general and administrative expense. Non-GAAP sales and marketing expense is defined as GAAP sales and marketing expense adjusted for amortization of intangible assets, stock-based compensation, and transaction-related costs. Non-GAAP research and development expense is defined as GAAP research and development expense adjusted for stock-based compensation and transaction-related costs. Non-GAAP general and administrative expense is defined as GAAP general and administrative expense adjusted for amortization of intangible assets, stock-based compensation, change in fair value of contingent consideration, transaction-related costs, and legal settlement gains or costs. BlackLine believes that presenting each of the non-GAAP operating expenses is useful to investors as it eliminates the impact of certain cash and non-cash expenses and allows a direct comparison of operating expenses between periods.

    Non-GAAP Income (Loss) from Operations and Non-GAAP Operating Margin. Non-GAAP income (loss) from operations is defined as GAAP income (loss) from operations adjusted for amortization of intangible assets, stock-based compensation, change in fair value of contingent consideration, transaction-related costs, legal settlement gains or costs, and restructuring costs. Non-GAAP operating margin is defined as non-GAAP income (loss) from operations divided by GAAP revenues. BlackLine believes that presenting non-GAAP income (loss) from operations and non-GAAP operating margin is useful to investors as it eliminates the impact of items that have been impacted by the Company’s acquisitions and other related costs in order to allow a direct comparison of income (loss) from operations between all periods presented.

    Non-GAAP Net Income (Loss) Attributable to BlackLine and Diluted Non-GAAP Net Income (Loss) Attributable to BlackLine, Inc. Per Share. Non-GAAP net income (loss) attributable to BlackLine is defined as GAAP net income (loss) attributable to BlackLine adjusted for the impact of the provision for (benefit from) income taxes related to acquisitions, amortization of intangible assets, stock-based compensation, amortization of debt issuance costs from our convertible senior notes, change in fair value of contingent consideration, transaction-related costs, legal settlement gains or costs, restructuring costs, adjustment to the redeemable non-controlling interest to the redemption amount, and gain on extinguishment of convertible senior notes. Diluted non-GAAP net income (loss) attributable to BlackLine, Inc. per share includes the adjustment for shares resulting from the elimination of stock-based compensation. BlackLine believes that presenting non-GAAP net income (loss) attributable to BlackLine is useful to investors as it eliminates the impact of items that have been impacted by the Company’s acquisitions and other related costs to allow a direct comparison of net income (loss) between all periods presented.

    Free Cash Flow. Free cash flow is defined as cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities less cash flows used to purchase property and equipment, financed and otherwise, capitalized software development, and intangible assets. BlackLine believes that presenting free cash flow is useful to investors as it provides a measure of the Company’s liquidity used by management to evaluate the amount of cash generated by the Company’s business including the impact of purchases of property and equipment and cost of capitalized software development.

    Use of Operating Metrics

    BlackLine has provided in this release and the quarterly conference call held on February 11, 2025 certain operating metrics, including (i) number of customers, (ii) number of users, and (iii) dollar-based net revenue retention rate, which BlackLine uses to evaluate its business, measure its performance, identify trends affecting its business, formulate financial projections and make strategic decisions. These operating metrics exclude the impact of certain Runbook licensed customers and users who are on perpetual license agreements and did not have an active subscription agreement with BlackLine as of December 31, 2024.

    Dollar-based Net Revenue Retention Rate. Dollar-based net revenue retention rate is calculated as the implied monthly subscription and support revenue at the end of a period for the base set of customers from which the Company generated subscription revenue in the year prior to the calculation, divided by the implied monthly subscription and support revenue one year prior to the date of calculation for that same customer base. This calculation does not reflect implied monthly subscription and support revenue for new customers added during the one-year period but does include the effect of customers who terminated during the period. Implied monthly subscription and support revenue is defined as the total amount of minimum subscription and support revenue contractually committed to, under each of BlackLine’s customer agreements over the entire term of the agreement, divided by the number of months in the term of the agreement. BlackLine believes that dollar-based net revenue retention rate is an important metric to measure the long-term value of customer agreements and the Company’s ability to retain and grow its relationships with existing customers over time.

    Number of Customers. A customer is defined as a company that contributes to our subscription and support revenue as of the measurement date. In situations where an organization has multiple subsidiaries or divisions, each entity that is invoiced as a separate entity is treated as a separate customer. In an instance where an existing customer requests its invoice be divided for the sole purpose of restructuring its internal billing arrangement without any incremental increase in revenue, such customer continues to be treated as a single customer. BlackLine believes that its ability to expand its customer base is an indicator of the Company’s market penetration and the growth of its business.

    Number of Users. Historically, BlackLine’s products were priced based on the number of users of its platform. Over time, the Company has begun to sell an increasing number of non-user based products with fixed or transaction-based pricing. For this reason, we believe the growth in the number of total users is less correlated to the growth of the business overall.

    Media Contact:
    Samantha Darilek
    samantha.darilek@blackline.com

    Investor Relations Contact:
    Matt Humphries, CFA
    matt.humphries@blackline.com

    BlackLine, Inc.
    Consolidated Balance Sheets
    (in thousands)
    (unaudited)
     
      December 31, 2024   December 31, 2023
    ASSETS
    Current assets:      
    Cash and cash equivalents $ 885,915     $ 271,117  
    Marketable securities   —       933,355  
    Accounts receivable, net of allowances   178,141       171,608  
    Prepaid expenses and other current assets   28,348       31,244  
    Total current assets   1,092,404       1,407,324  
    Capitalized software development costs, net   45,448       37,828  
    Property and equipment, net   11,840       14,867  
    Intangible assets, net   59,520       79,056  
    Goodwill   448,965       448,965  
    Operating lease right-of-use assets   22,772       19,173  
    Deferred tax assets, net   53,208       145  
    Other assets   90,879       93,407  
    Total assets $ 1,825,036     $ 2,100,765  
    LIABILITIES, REDEEMABLE NON-CONTROLLING INTEREST, AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
    Current liabilities:      
    Accounts payable $ 8,463     $ 8,623  
    Accrued expenses and other current liabilities   71,574       59,690  
    Deferred revenue, current   338,615       320,133  
    Finance lease liabilities, current   66       778  
    Operating lease liabilities, current   3,525       4,108  
    Convertible senior notes, net, current   —       249,233  
    Total current liabilities   422,243       642,565  
    Finance lease liabilities, noncurrent   53       4  
    Operating lease liabilities, noncurrent   20,283       15,738  
    Convertible senior notes, net, noncurrent   892,675       1,140,608  
    Deferred tax liabilities, net   4,532       6,394  
    Deferred revenue, noncurrent   1,390       904  
    Other long-term liabilities   708       3,608  
    Total liabilities   1,341,884       1,809,821  
    Commitments and contingencies      
    Redeemable non-controlling interest   36,483       30,063  
    Stockholders’ equity:      
    Common stock   628       615  
    Additional paid-in capital   495,391       474,863  
    Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)   (361 )     205  
    Accumulated deficit   (48,989 )     (214,802 )
    Total stockholders’ equity   446,669       260,881  
    Total liabilities, redeemable non-controlling interest, and stockholders’ equity $ 1,825,036     $ 2,100,765  
           
    BlackLine, Inc.
    Consolidated Statements of Operations
    (in thousands, except per share data)
    (unaudited)
     
      Quarter Ended   Year Ended
      December 31,   December 31,
        2024       2023       2024       2023  
    Revenues              
    Subscription and support $ 160,988     $ 147,155     $ 619,287     $ 555,516  
    Professional services   8,472       8,575       34,049       34,480  
    Total revenues   169,460       155,730       653,336       589,996  
    Cost of revenues              
    Subscription and support   34,833       31,373       135,308       121,308  
    Professional services   6,581       6,239       26,657       25,485  
    Total cost of revenues   41,414       37,612       161,965       146,793  
    Gross profit   128,046       118,118       491,371       443,203  
    Operating expenses              
    Sales and marketing   64,769       56,898       248,347       243,154  
    Research and development   24,588       22,578       100,973       103,207  
    General and administrative   32,480       24,676       121,795       71,530  
    Restructuring costs   (8 )     1,151       1,720       10,964  
    Total operating expenses   121,829       105,303       472,835       428,855  
    Income from operations   6,217       12,815       18,536       14,348  
    Other income (expense)              
    Interest income   9,399       14,822       49,808       52,059  
    Interest expense   (2,523 )     (1,484 )     (8,758 )     (5,898 )
    Gain on extinguishment of convertible senior notes   —       —       65,112       —  
    Other income, net   6,876       13,338       106,162       46,161  
    Income before income taxes   13,093       26,153       124,698       60,509  
    Provision for (benefit from) income taxes   (50,374 )     1,901       (43,067 )     1,450  
    Net income   63,467       24,252       167,765       59,059  
    Net income attributable to redeemable non-controlling interest   670       293       1,952       892  
    Adjustment attributable to redeemable non-controlling interest   6,380       1,890       4,639       5,334  
    Net income attributable to BlackLine, Inc. $ 56,417     $ 22,069     $ 161,174     $ 52,833  
    Basic net income attributable to BlackLine, Inc. per share $ 0.90     $ 0.36     $ 2.59     $ 0.87  
    Shares used to calculate basic net income per share   62,640       61,391       62,129       60,849  
    Diluted net income attributable to BlackLine, Inc. per share $ 0.79     $ 0.32     $ 1.45     $ 0.81  
    Shares used to calculate diluted net income per share   74,610       72,470       73,503       72,045  
    BlackLine, Inc.
    Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
    (in thousands)
    (unaudited)
     
      Quarter Ended   Year Ended
      December 31,   December 31,
        2024       2023       2024       2023  
    Cash flows from operating activities              
    Net income attributable to BlackLine, Inc. $ 56,417     $ 22,069     $ 161,174     $ 52,833  
    Net income and adjustment attributable to redeemable non-controlling interest   7,050       2,183       6,591       6,226  
    Net income   63,467       24,252       167,765       59,059  
    Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:              
    Depreciation and amortization   12,120       12,825       50,345       50,099  
    Change in fair value of contingent consideration   —       —       —       (33,549 )
    Amortization of debt issuance costs   849       1,398       4,486       5,535  
    Stock-based compensation   19,340       17,505       83,251       77,970  
    Gain on extinguishment of convertible senior notes   —       —       (65,112 )     —  
    Noncash lease expense   1,611       1,728       6,221       6,453  
    Accretion of purchase discounts on marketable securities, net   (326 )     (8,885 )     (18,441 )     (33,884 )
    Net foreign currency (gains) losses   (81 )     (29 )     279       853  
    Deferred income taxes   (53,323 )     281       (54,802 )     (1,525 )
    Provision for (benefit from) credit losses   70       (1 )     84       (18 )
    Changes in operating assets and liabilities:              
    Accounts receivable   (43,317 )     (41,300 )     (7,552 )     (20,855 )
    Prepaid expenses and other current assets   (1,609 )     (4,449 )     2,742       (6,599 )
    Other assets   298       (1,947 )     2,505       (595 )
    Accounts payable   4,333       4,341       (1,123 )     (5,104 )
    Accrued expenses and other current liabilities   3,968       (2,111 )     7,087       (924 )
    Deferred revenue   37,819       42,536       18,968       41,271  
    Contingent consideration paid in excess of original estimates   —       (2,393 )     —       (2,393 )
    Operating lease liabilities   (1,563 )     (1,936 )     (5,963 )     (7,171 )
    Lease incentive receipts   —       —       —       240  
    Other long-term liabilities   138       354       96       (2,250 )
    Net cash provided by operating activities   43,794       42,169       190,836       126,613  
    Cash flows from investing activities              
    Purchases of marketable securities   —       (360,866 )     (396,104 )     (1,343,331 )
    Proceeds from maturities of marketable securities   121,289       363,521       1,023,286       1,319,821  
    Proceeds from sales of marketable securities   —       —       324,098       —  
    Capitalized software development costs   (6,513 )     (4,807 )     (24,714 )     (21,644 )
    Purchases of property and equipment   (756 )     (2,026 )     (2,126 )     (5,953 )
    Acquisition, net of cash acquired   —       (9 )     —       (11,376 )
    Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities   114,020       (4,187 )     924,440       (62,483 )
    Cash flows from financing activities              
    Proceeds from issuance of convertible senior notes, net of issuance costs   —       —       661,979       —  
    Partial repurchase of convertible senior notes   —       —       (848,519 )     —  
    Repayment of convertible senior notes   —       —       (250,000 )     —  
    Purchase of capped calls related to convertible senior notes   —       —       (59,738 )     —  
    Principal payments under finance lease obligations   (228 )     (255 )     (999 )     (990 )
    Proceeds from exercises of stock options   4,553       775       7,591       19,762  
    Proceeds from employee stock purchase plan   2,757       2,719       7,006       8,010  
    Acquisition of common stock for tax withholding obligations   (3,861 )     (885 )     (17,465 )     (15,029 )
    Payment of contingent consideration   —       (5,607 )     —       (5,607 )
    Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities   3,221       (3,253 )     (500,145 )     6,146  
    Effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes on cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash   (403 )     151       (347 )     (120 )
    Net increase in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash   160,632       34,880       614,784       70,156  
    Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash, beginning of period   725,515       236,483       271,363       201,207  
    Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash, end of period $ 886,147     $ 271,363     $ 886,147     $ 271,363  
                   
    Reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash to the consolidated balance sheets              
    Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 885,915     $ 271,117     $ 885,915     $ 271,117  
    Restricted cash included within other assets at end of period   232       246       232       246  
    Total cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at end of period shown in the consolidated statements of cash flows $ 886,147     $ 271,363     $ 886,147     $ 271,363  
    BlackLine, Inc.
    Calculation of Diluted Net Income Per Share
    (in thousands, except per share data)
    (unaudited)
     
      Quarter Ended   Year Ended
      December 31,   December 31,
          2024       2023       2024       2023  
    Diluted Net Income per Share                
    Numerator:                
    Net income attributable to BlackLine, Inc.   $ 56,417     $ 22,069     $ 161,174     $ 52,833  
    Interest expense, net of taxes     2,305       1,458       7,804       5,716  
    Gain on extinguishment of convertible senior notes, net of taxes     —       —       (62,147 )     —  
    Net income attributable to BlackLine, Inc. for diluted calculation   $ 58,722     $ 23,527     $ 106,831     $ 58,549  
    Denominator:                
    Shares used to calculate diluted net income per share     74,610       72,470       73,503       72,045  
    Diluted net income attributable to BlackLine, Inc. per share   $ 0.79     $ 0.32     $ 1.45     $ 0.81  
                     
    BlackLine, Inc.
    Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures
    (in thousands, except percentages and per share data)
    (unaudited)
     
        Quarter Ended   Year Ended
        December 31,   December 31,
          2024       2023       2024       2023  
    Non-GAAP Gross Profit:                
    Gross profit   $ 128,046     $ 118,118     $ 491,371     $ 443,203  
    Amortization of acquired developed technology     3,243       3,419       13,370       12,438  
    Stock-based compensation     3,561       3,121       13,347       12,440  
    Transaction-related costs     25       132       151       478  
    Total non-GAAP gross profit   $ 134,875     $ 124,790     $ 518,239     $ 468,559  
    Gross margin     75.6 %     75.8 %     75.2 %     75.1 %
    Non-GAAP gross margin     79.6 %     80.1 %     79.3 %     79.4 %
                     
    Non-GAAP Operating Income:                
    Operating income   $ 6,217     $ 12,815     $ 18,536     $ 14,348  
    Amortization of intangible assets     4,305       5,249       19,886       20,608  
    Stock-based compensation     20,138       18,101       86,097       80,068  
    Change in fair value of contingent consideration     —       —       —       (33,549 )
    Transaction-related costs     —       1,246       568       5,078  
    Restructuring costs     (8 )     1,151       1,720       10,964  
    Total non-GAAP operating income   $ 30,652     $ 38,562     $ 126,807     $ 97,517  
    GAAP operating margin     3.7 %     8.2 %     2.8 %     2.4 %
    Non-GAAP operating margin     18.1 %     24.8 %     19.4 %     16.5 %
                     
    Non-GAAP Net Income Attributable to BlackLine, Inc.:                
    Net income attributable to BlackLine, Inc.   $ 56,417     $ 22,069     $ 161,174     $ 52,833  
    Provision for (benefit from) income taxes     (53,351 )     526       (50,948 )     (1,196 )
    Amortization of intangible assets     4,305       5,249       19,886       20,608  
    Stock-based compensation     20,044       17,981       85,654       79,588  
    Amortization of debt issuance costs     849       1,398       4,486       5,535  
    Change in fair value of contingent consideration     —       —       —       (33,549 )
    Transaction-related costs     —       1,246       568       5,078  
    Restructuring costs     (8 )     1,151       1,720       10,964  
    Adjustment to redeemable non-controlling interest     6,380       1,890       4,639       5,334  
    Gain on extinguishment of convertible senior notes     —       —       (65,112 )     —  
    Total non-GAAP net income attributable to BlackLine, Inc.   $ 34,636     $ 51,510     $ 162,067     $ 145,195  
                     
    Basic Non-GAAP Net Income Attributable to BlackLine, Inc. per share                
    Basic non-GAAP net income attributable to BlackLine, Inc. per share   $ 0.55     $ 0.84     $ 2.61     $ 2.39  
    Shares used to calculate basic non-GAAP net income per share     62,640       61,391       62,129       60,849  
                     
    Diluted Non-GAAP Net Income Attributable to BlackLine, Inc. per share                
    Numerator:                
    Non-GAAP net income attributable to BlackLine, Inc.   $ 34,636     $ 51,510     $ 162,067     $ 145,195  
    Interest expense, net of taxes     1,539       77       3,909       306  
    Non-GAAP net income attributable to BlackLine, Inc. for diluted calculation   $ 36,175     $ 51,587     $ 165,976     $ 145,501  
    Denominator:                
    Shares used to calculate diluted non-GAAP net income per share     77,324       74,603       76,124       74,382  
    Diluted non-GAAP net income attributable to BlackLine, Inc. per share   $ 0.47     $ 0.69     $ 2.18     $ 1.96  
                     
    Non-GAAP Sales and Marketing Expense:                
    Sales and marketing expense   $ 64,769     $ 56,898     $ 248,347     $ 243,154  
    Amortization of intangible assets     (983 )     (1,751 )     (6,201 )     (6,791 )
    Stock-based compensation     (6,260 )     (5,364 )     (25,428 )     (24,152 )
    Transaction-related costs     (136 )     (110 )     (320 )     (397 )
    Total non-GAAP sales and marketing expense   $ 57,390     $ 49,673     $ 216,398     $ 211,814  
                     
    Non-GAAP Research and Development Expense:                
    Research and development expense   $ 24,588     $ 22,578     $ 100,973     $ 103,207  
    Stock-based compensation     (3,390 )     (1,813 )     (13,345 )     (13,095 )
    Transaction-related costs     170       (833 )     (46 )     (2,857 )
    Total non-GAAP research and development expense   $ 21,368     $ 19,932     $ 87,582     $ 87,255  
                     
    Non-GAAP General and Administrative Expense:                
    General and administrative expense   $ 32,480     $ 24,676     $ 121,795     $ 71,530  
    Amortization of intangible assets     (79 )     (79 )     (315 )     (1,379 )
    Stock-based compensation     (6,927 )     (7,803 )     (33,977 )     (30,381 )
    Change in fair value of contingent consideration     —       —       —       33,549  
    Transaction-related costs     (9 )     (171 )     (51 )     (1,346 )
    Total non-GAAP general and administrative expense   $ 25,465     $ 16,623     $ 87,452     $ 71,973  
                     
    Total Non-GAAP Operating Expenses   $ 104,223     $ 86,228     $ 391,432     $ 371,042  
                     
    Free Cash Flow                
    Net cash provided by operating activities   $ 43,794     $ 42,169     $ 190,836     $ 126,613  
    Capitalized software development costs     (6,513 )     (4,807 )     (24,714 )     (21,644 )
    Purchases of property and equipment     (756 )     (2,026 )     (2,126 )     (5,953 )
    Free cash flow   $ 36,525     $ 35,336     $ 163,996     $ 99,016  
                     

    The MIL Network –

    February 12, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Sen. Mangham: A Warm Welcome to the 2025 Legislative Session 

    Source: US State of Georgia

    We’re now a quarter of the way through the 2025 Legislative Session, and every day under the Gold Dome, I am reminded why I fight for the people of the 55th Senate District. We began the legislative session on Monday, January 13, and we have hit the ground running with committee meetings, bill hearings and debates. This week marked a major turning point as committees met to take up some of our state’s most pressing issues, from education to healthcare to economic opportunity.

    Over the remaining 30 legislative days, I’m committed to fighting for policies that create a more equitable and inclusive Georgia for all its residents. I am honored to serve on the Senate Committees on Banking and Financial Institutions, Health and Human Services, Interstate Cooperation, Retirement, State and Local Governmental Operations, and MARTOC where we will address pressing issues that affect all Georgians.

    During our first week of session, Governor Brian Kemp delivered his annual State of the State address to a joint session of the Senate and House chambers. While we may not always agree, I look forward to working on areas where we can find common ground, including pay raises for teachers, state employees and first responders, as well as efforts to strengthen our healthcare workforce. Georgia must ensure that every resident has access to affordable healthcare, expand opportunities for quality public education, invest in renewable energy solutions, and address the growing need for affordable housing. These priorities are critical for building a more prosperous and equitable Georgia.

    In January, the Senate Democratic Caucus announced several key legislative priorities for this session. We introduced Senate Bill 50, a bipartisan effort to close health insurance gaps, expand access to mental health and maternal care and ensure working families can afford quality healthcare. Too many Georgians rely on emergency rooms for primary care because they lack affordable insurance. Healthcare should be a right, not a privilege, and we will continue advocating for policies that lower costs and expand coverage. In the coming weeks, our caucus will introduce bills to raise the state minimum wage, strengthen public schools, and improve access to affordable childcare.

    Beyond legislative work, it has been an honor to welcome so many incredible Georgians to the Capitol. Last month, we welcomed members of the Gwinnett Chamber of Commerce to celebrate the economic achievements of businesses in our district. Gwinnett is a vibrant hub of innovation and growth, and I am proud to support policies that strengthen our local economy. This week, we honored Rosa Parks and her legacy. Her courage and activism sparked the civil rights movement, and we remain deeply grateful for her contributions to justice and equality.

    I also want to encourage students between 12 and 18 to apply for the Senate Page Program. This is a unique opportunity for young people to see how our government operates firsthand. I highly encourage students who are passionate about civic engagement to apply. You can find more details here.

    With the clock ticking for the remainder of the 2025 Session, I promise to keep fighting for a more just and equitable Georgia. I am grateful for your trust, and I urge you to stay engaged. Call, email, or visit my office with questions or concerns.

    # # # #

    Sen. Randal Mangham represents the 55th Senate District which includes portions of Gwinnett and Dekalb County. He may be reached by phone at (404) 657-4640 or by email at Randal.Mangham@senate.ga.gov.

    For all media inquiries, please reach out to SenatePressInquiries@senate.ga.gov.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    February 12, 2025
  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Energy Sector – Energy Competition Task Force identifies new ways to empower electricity consumers

    Source: Electricity Authority

    The Energy Competition Task Force (the Task Force) has identified new ways to give consumers more control over their energy costs and to harness the power of rooftop solar and batteries. The Electricity Authority Te Mana Hiko (the Authority) is now seeking feedback on three proposed changes to regulation to promote competition, reliable power supply, and efficient operation of the electricity market for the long-term benefit of all New Zealanders.
    Two of the three proposed changes are about rewarding consumers for supplying electricity to the network at peak times, typically through their own solar and battery systems. The other would make ‘time-of-use’ power plans (plans that reward off-peak electricity use) available to most New Zealanders.
    Electricity Authority Chair and Task Force member Anna Kominik says there are real benefits if consumers are empowered to more actively participate in the electricity market, including increased energy resilience and reduced power costs over time.
    “New Zealand’s electricity market currently relies on a few big generators to supply electricity at select locations and transmit it to households and businesses across the country. But as uptake of solar and battery systems continues to increase, more consumers will be able to contribute to our electricity system. And as smart electronics and vehicles become more ubiquitous, consumers will also be able to more actively manage their own energy use and costs.
    “We’re proposing three changes to help support this consumer empowerment and decentralisation of our energy system. Over time, this will increase community resilience and lower power costs for everyone,” she said.
    The proposals would require:
    • Consumer-supply rebates from distributors: lines companies to provide a rebate when consumers supply energy into congested parts of the network (Task Force Initiative 2A)
    • Time-varying retail pricing for consumption: large electricity retailers to offer at least one time-of-use pricing plan to all their customers (Task Force Initiative 2B)
    • Time-varying retail pricing for supply: large electricity retailers to offer at least one time-varying rate for when they buy electricity from consumers (Task Force Initiative 2C).
    Making ‘time-of-use’ power plans more widely available for Kiwis
    Commerce Commission Chair and Task Force member, Dr John Small, said the Initiative 2B proposal would significantly increase availability of ‘time-of-use’ pricing plans. These plans reward consumers for using power during off-peak hours, meaning they can take advantage of cheaper off-peak power, instead of paying a single flat rate.
    “While time-of-use pricing plans aren’t new, many consumers don’t have access to one through their current retailer. As these plans provide a simple, effective tool for consumers to manage their energy use and costs, we’d like to see all major retailers offer them, so more consumers have this choice.”
    Dr Small said the plans have the additional benefit of reducing overall electricity costs for consumers across the country.
    “People on these plans are incentivised to shift their use away from peak periods when electricity is most expensive. The more consumers shift their use at these times – for example by running EV chargers later at night when electricity demand is generally lower – the less high-cost electricity needs to be generated, and this lowers costs for everyone,” he said.
    Rewarding consumers for supplying electricity to the network at peak times
    Kominik explains that the initiative 2A and 2C proposals would reward consumers who can supply electricity when demand on the network is peaking, typically through their own solar and battery systems.
    “We’d like to see people fairly rewarded for supplying power when it’s needed, and incentivise efficient uptake of flexible, small-scale electricity generation systems such as rooftop solar and batteries. Energy from rooftop solar supplied at peak times can ease pressure on the electricity network, reducing demand and keeping the lines costs we all pay for through our power bills to a minimum.
    “By incentivising households and businesses to invest in their own generation, we can help meet New Zealand’s electricity needs when demand is high and improve community resilience,” she said.
    The Task Force invites feedback on these proposals through the eight-week consultation period, which closes at 5pm on Wednesday 9th April, with two further weeks for cross-submissions.
    As part of this consultation package, the Electricity Authority is releasing an issues paper that explores whether the existing pricing rules for distributed generation are fit for purpose. The issues and potential solutions explored in this paper support the proposals in the Task Force initiative 2A consultation paper. Visit this Authority webpage for more information on the issues paper.
    The Energy Competition Task Force was established by the Commerce Commission Te Komihana Tauhokohoko and Electricity Authority Te Mana Hiko in August 2024 to investigate ways to improve the performance of the electricity market.
    The Task Force is considering eight initiatives that will encourage more and faster investment in new electricity generation, boost competition, enable homes, businesses and industrials to better manage their own electricity use and costs, and put downward pressure on prices.
    The attached diagram illustrates the various charges between distributors, retailers and consumers and where proposals for initiatives 2A and 2C would be incorporated. 

    MIL OSI New Zealand News –

    February 12, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: Raksha Mantri invites investors to go long on investment in India; Assures them of stable policy environment in India

    Source: Government of India (2)

    Raksha Mantri invites investors to go long on investment in India; Assures them of stable policy environment in India

    Consensus at all levels of Government on leading role of the private sector: Shri Rajnath Singh at Global Investors’ Meet in Bengaluru

    Posted On: 11 FEB 2025 5:55PM by PIB Delhi

    Raksha Mantri Rajnath Singh has asked global investors to go long in their Indian investment plans. Speaking at the inaugural function of the Global Investors’ Meet organised by the Government of Karnataka in Bengaluru today, Raksha Mantri said that investors will benefit from India’s formidable strengths like political stability, huge marketing potential it offers and an ecosystem based on rule of law, free from uncertainty and disorder. He noted that India’s immense investment potential has witnessed sustained success, lasting impact and enduring growth. 

    Shri Rajnath Singh stressed that India’s constitutional values are deeply rooted in its rich history of acceptance of different ideas and are illustrated in the close coordination between Union and state governments. He said the Government has actively worked to address the challenges, including red tapism, that investors previously faced. He added that the cumbersome process of obtaining multiple clearances has been replaced by a single-window system, ensuring a faster and hassle-free experience by the investors. 

    Assuring of a strong market demand for the investors to tap into India’s potential, Raksha Mantri said India is already one of the world’s fastest-growing markets. He emphasised that several recent economic decisions are expected to further strengthen the demand environment. He added that, under the visionary leadership of Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi, the Government has introduced a massive income tax cut, in this year’s budget announcement. This significant tax relief will substantially increase the disposable income of the public, leading to stronger business growth for the investor firms, he mentioned. 

    Shri Rajnath Singh recalled his interaction with entrepreneurs who expressed concern that they might invest in a promising sector today, only to face unexpected policy changes later, which could disrupt their plans and profits. Assuaging such doubts, he said that across all levels of governance in India there is a broad consensus that sustainable economic development must be driven by a market-led economy, with a leading role of the private sector. He further elaborated that this shared commitment provides a stable and predictable policy environment, ensuring that businesses can invest, with confidence of policy continuity. “Today, investors do not face red tapism in India. Instead, we roll out the red carpet for them. This kind of cross-political party consensus on promoting investment plays a crucial role in reducing uncertainty for our investors,” he added.  

    Calling for investment in Karnataka, Raksha Mantri asserted that in the era of Cooperative Federalism, central and state governments are working closely together to shape the country’s economy. Citing Bengaluru as a pioneering hub for various industries like IT and software, he said that the city is now a rising centre for Artificial Intelligence (AI) too. Asserting that this is the moment and the perfect time to invest in India, Raksha Mantri noted the unprecedented opportunities before investors. 

    Shri Rajnath Singh lauded the contributions of the investors who have been instrumental in shaping the nation’s economic progress. He added that a lot more needs to be done, towards the national objective of becoming a Viksit Bharat by 2047, and expressed confidence that, together, the goal will be achieved. 

    Chief Minister of Karnataka Shri Siddaramaiah, Union Minister of Consumer Affairs Shri Pralhad Joshi, Deputy Chief Minister of Karnataka Shri DK Shivakumar, Ministers of the state government and industry representatives were also present at the event.

     ***

    VK/SPS/MJS

    (Release ID: 2101880) Visitor Counter : 64

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News –

    February 12, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: Self-Help Groups

    Source: Government of India (2)

    Posted On: 11 FEB 2025 5:43PM by PIB Delhi

    The Ministry of Rural Development (MoRD), inter-alia, is implementing Deendayal Antyodaya Yojana –National Rural Livelihoods Mission (DAY-NRLM) and Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) in which Self Help Groups (SHGs) are involved. These Schemes are implemented through State Governments/UT Administrations. In addition, SHGs are being involved by other Departments/Ministries and State Government Departments dealing with rural development from time to time.

    DAY-NRLM is being implemented across the country in a mission mode since 2011 with the aim to bring at least one-woman member from each rural poor household, as per the Socio-Economic Caste Census (SECC) 2011 data and process of Participatory Identification of Poor (PIP), into the fold of Self-Help Groups (SHGs) and to support them to take up economic activities. As on 31st January, 2025 about 10.05 crore Women households have been mobilized into 90.90 lakh Self Help Groups (SHGs). The State/UT wise details of the number of households mobilized into SHGs since 2011 under the Mission is attached at Annexure.

    Under MGNREGA, SHG members are involved in the planning of works through participation in Gram Sabha projects, play the role of Social Auditors and are also engaged as worksite supervisors (mates). In addition, the Programme progressively engages Federations of Women Self-help Groups as Project Implementing Agencies (PIAs) at the Gram Panchayat / Block / District level.

    (b): Under DAY-NRLM, various sub-schemes like Mahila Kisan Sashaktikaran Pariyojana (MKSP), Start-up Village Entrepreneurship Programme (SVEP), National Rural Economic Transformation Project (NRETP), Deendayal Upadhyay Gramin Kaushalya Yojana (DDU-GKY), Rural Self Employment Training Institutes (RSETI) are being implemented for enhancing the income on sustainable basis of the rural poor. The mission seeks to achieve its objective through investing in four core components viz., (i) social mobilization and promotion of sustainable community institutions of the rural poor (Self Help Groups-SHGs, Village Organisations-VOs, Cluster Level Federations-CLFs); (ii) financial inclusion, (iii) sustainable livelihoods; and (iv) convergence and entitlements. Accordingly, within the ambit of the mission and with the converging schemes of the other Ministries, SHG members are being facilitated for promotion of sustainable livelihoods, so that they may reach an aspirational goal of having minimum of one lakh rupee as annual income. For facilitating this initiative, a mobile application has been rolled out for surveying the income and activities of the SHG households.

    The Ministry in collaboration with Government e-Marketplace (GeM) has created “SARAS Collection” as a Store Front in GeM for marketing of SHG products. Also, Memorandum of Understandings (MoUs) have been entered on 2nd November, 2021 and 12th May, 2022 between Ministry and Flipkart Internet Pvt. Ltd. and Amazon respectively to allow the Self-Help Groups (SHGs) producers including the artisans, weavers and craftsmen to access national markets through the Flipkart Samarth programme and Amazon Saheli initiative. An MoU has also been signed by the Ministry with Patanjali on 2nd November, 2022 for collaboration in various fields including online marketing of SHGs products.

    An e-Commerce platform (www.esaras.in) has also been launched by the Ministry for online marketing of SHG products. An MoU has been signed between MoRD and Fashnear Technologies Pvt. Ltd. (Meesho) on February 16, 2023 and Jio Mart (Reliance Retail Ltd) on 8th Dec,2023 for onboarding and marketing of SHGs products.

    Further, some States have also developed their own e-Commerce platform to support marketing of products of SHGs.

    State/UT wise details of the number of households mobilized & SHGs Formed as on 31st January, 2025

    Sl No

    State

    SHGs formed

    Households Mobilized

    1

    Andhra Pradesh

    855600

    9075289

    2

    Assam

    361516

    4111020

    3

    Bihar

    1097100

    12713428

    4

    Chhattisgarh

    276375

    3068427

    5

    Gujarat

    279758

    2783006

    6

    Jharkhand

    291601

    3589607

    7

    Karnataka

    360684

    4207374

    8

    Kerala

    271209

    4002478

    9

    Madhya Pradesh

    487291

    5829972

    10

    Maharashtra

    640719

    6525549

    11

    Odisha

    551141

    5775035

    12

    Rajasthan

    321875

    3804161

    13

    Tamil Nadu

    336764

    4023939

    14

    Telangana

    442979

    4820573

    15

    Uttar Pradesh

    842101

    9509884

    16

    West Bengal

    1192980

    12251533

    17

    Haryana

    60301

    629094

    18

    Himachal Pradesh

    45295

    378542

    19

    Jammu & Kashmir

    91445

    797805

    20

    Punjab

    52118

    543246

    21

    Uttarakhand

    65840

    497777

    22

    Arunachal Pradesh

    11730

    91964

    23

    Manipur

    11538

    117457

    24

    Meghalaya

    45312

    444264

    25

    Mizoram

    10291

    85934

    26

    Nagaland

    15419

    135261

    27

    Sikkim

    5915

    56675

    28

    Tripura

    51841

    494675

    29

    Andaman & Nicobar Islands

    1294

    13194

    30

    Goa

    3891

    50735

    31

    Ladakh

    1745

    12230

    32

    Lakshadweep

    348

    4363

    33

    Puducherry

    4744

    59714

    34

    Daman DIU and NH

    1645

    16674

     

    Total

    9090405

    100520879

     

    This information was given by the Minister of State for Rural Development Dr. Chandra Sekhar Pemmasani in a written reply in Lok Sabha today.

    *****

     

    MG/KSR/1203

    (Release ID: 2101864) Visitor Counter : 37

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News –

    February 12, 2025
  • MIL-Evening Report: There is declining trust in Australian unis. Federal government policy is a big part of the problem

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Graeme Turner, Emeritus Professor of Cultural Studies, The University of Queensland

    Matej Kastellic/ Shutterstock

    As we head towards the federal election, both sides of politics are making a point of criticising universities and questioning their role in the community.

    Opposition Leader Peter Dutton has accused unis of focusing on “woke” issues that “just aren’t cutting it around kitchen tables”.

    The Albanese government has also accused universities of being out of touch. A Labor-chaired Senate committee has just set up an inquiry into university governance, pointing to “an extraordinary range” of issues, including executive pay.

    Both the Coalition and Labor want to clamp down on international student numbers, arguing they drive up city rents and threaten the integrity of Australian higher education.

    The criticism goes beyond politics. Recent media coverage called the sector a “mess” and asked “is a university degree still worth it?”

    No wonder newsletter Future Campus says the “hottest topic” in Australian higher education is whether universities have lost their social licence.

    What is social licence?

    A social licence means a community has given tacit permission for an organisation to operate. It goes beyond simple laws or regulations, and extends to the idea that a community implicitly trusts and has confidence in an organisation.

    A social licence means businesses, in particular, should not ignore their responsibility to provide a social benefit to their communities. This needs to go beyond providing commodities or generating profits.

    It may be a bit of stretch to compare universities with multinational corporations. But they have come under scrutiny for systemic underpayment of staff, “excessive” vice-chancellor and senior executive salaries and a structural over-reliance on international student income.

    In December 2024, a state parliament review expressed concern the University of Tasmania was prioritising “commercial over community interests in its core functions”.

    At the same time, Australian surveys show declining levels of public trust in universities and community concerns that profits take precedence over education.

    Governments have played a role

    So there are many reasons to ask how well our universities benefit the national community, beyond their economic outputs.

    But while our politicians readily line up to express concern, it is highly disingenuous to only blame universities for their standing in the community.

    The situation politicians now lament is the result of a long-term, bipartisan political project, prosecuted by successive federal governments.

    As a 2023 Australia Institute report found, federal government funding for universities (excluding HECS/HELP) has fallen from 0.9% of GDP in 1995 to 0.6% of GDP in 2021. Both Coalition and Labor governments have sought to reduce the sector’s costs to the budget.

    Over a similar period, enrolments tripled.




    Read more:
    Tumult and transformation: the story of Australian universities over the past 30 years


    Behaving like businesses

    To compensate for this funding loss, universities have been coaxed into behaving more like businesses.

    The federal policy settings have shown them the way to go.

    Teaching foreign students is more profitable than teaching domestic students, research collaborations with business and industry are more profitable than collaboration with communities. Increasingly, in the search for new income sources, commercial, rather than academic, considerations have driven institutional decisions.

    In a competitive market, the interests of individual institutions rather than those of the nation inevitably prevail.

    There has been a succession of redundancies and knowledge, learning and personnel have been lost. The losses have wound back generations of accrued cultural and educational capital for the nation.

    It is no surprise public confidence in universities’ utility and legitimacy has diminished.

    The most significant problem

    This is not to say universities are blameless. University leaders and academics acknowledge there has been a loss of public confidence. There is also acknowledgement some of the damage is due to internal issues – such as governance failures.

    But the most significant problem is the corrosive effect of several decades of commercialisation, underpinned by a political disregard for the sector’s contribution to the public good.

    If political leaders are serious about arresting the erosion of our universities’ social licence, it would be helpful if they stopped behaving as if it has nothing to do with them.

    Graeme Turner’s book, Broken: Universities, politics and the public good, will be published by Monash University Press in July as part of its In the National Interest series.

    Graeme Turner does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    – ref. There is declining trust in Australian unis. Federal government policy is a big part of the problem – https://theconversation.com/there-is-declining-trust-in-australian-unis-federal-government-policy-is-a-big-part-of-the-problem-248770

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

    February 12, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: Prime Minister addresses the 14th India-France CEOs Forum

    Source: Government of India (2)

    Categories24-7, Asia Pacific, Government of India, India, MIL OSI

    Post navigation

    Prime Minister’s Office

    Prime Minister addresses the 14th India-France CEOs Forum

    Posted On: 12 FEB 2025 12:16AM by PIB Delhi

    Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi and the President of France, H.E. Mr. Emmanuel Macron jointly addressed the 14th India-France CEOs Forum today in Paris. The forum brought together CEOs from a diverse group of companies from both sides, focusing on sectors such as defence, aerospace, critical and emerging technologies, infrastructure, advanced manufacturing, artificial intelligence, life-sciences, wellness and lifestyle, and food and hospitality.

    Prime Minister in his address noted the expanding India-France business and economic collaboration and the impetus it has provided to the strategic partnership between the two countries. He highlighted India’s attractiveness as a favored global investment destination, based on its stable polity and predictable policy ecosystem. Talking of the reforms announced in the recent budget, PM noted that the insurance sector was now open for 100% FDI and civil nuclear energy sector for private participation with focus on SMR and AMR technologies; customs rate structure was rationalized; and simplified income tax code was being brought in to enhance Ease of Living. Referring to the government’s commitment to continue ushering in reforms, he noted that a high-level committee for regulatory reforms had been constituted to establish trust based economic governance. In the same spirit, more than 40,000 compliances had been rationalized in the last few years.

    Prime Minister invited French companies to look at the immense opportunities offered by the India growth story, in the defense, energy, highway, civil aviation, space, healthcare, fintech and sustainable development sectors. Underlining global appreciation and interest in India’s skills, talent and innovation and in its newly launched AI, Semiconductor, Quantum, Critical Minerals and Hydrogen missions, he called upon French enterprises to partner India for mutual growth and prosperity. He outlined the importance of active engagement in these sectors, reaffirming the commitment of both nations to fostering innovation, investment, and technology-driven partnerships. Full remarks of Prime Minister may be seen here

    External Affairs Minister Dr. S. Jaishankar, alongside the Minister for Europe and Foreign Affairs of France, H.E. Jean-Noël Barrot, and the Minister of the Economy, Finance, and Industrial and Digital Sovereignty of France, H.E. Eric Lombard also addressed the Forum.

    5. CEOs from both sides who attended the meeting were:

    Indian Side:

      Company Name(Sector) Name and Designation

    1

    Jubiliant Foodsworks/Jubiliant Life Sciences, Food and Beverage

    Hari Bhartia, Co-Chairman and Director

    2.

    CII

    Chandrajit Banerjee, Director General

    3.

    Titagarh Rail Systems Limited (TRSL), Railways and Infrastructure

    Umesh Chowdhary, Vice Chairman and Managing Director

    4.

    Bharat Light & Power Private Limited, (Renewable Energy)

    Tejpreet Chopra, President & CEO

    5.

    P Mafatlal Group, Textiles and Industrial Products

    Vishad Mafatlal, Chairman

    6.

    boat, Consumer Electronics (Wearables)

    Aman Gupta, Co-Founder

    7.

    Dalit Indian Chamber of Commerce & Industry (DICCI), Business Advocacy and Inclusion

    Milind Kamble, Founder/Chairman

    8.

    Skyroot Aerospace, Aerospace & Space and Technology

    Pawan Kumar Chandana,Co-Founder

    9.

    Agnikul, Aerospace & Space and Technology

    Srinath Ravichandran, Co-Founder & CEO

    10.

    Tata Advanced Systems Ltd, Aerospace and Defense

    Sukaran Singh, Managing Director

    11

    UPL Group, Agrochemical and Agribusiness

    Vikram Shroff, Vice Chairman and Co-CEO

    12.

    Sula Vineyards, Food and Beverage

    Rajeev Samant, CEO

    13.

    Dynamatic Technologies Ltd, Aerospace & Defence, and Engineering

    Udayant Malhoutra, CEO & Managing Director

    14.

    Tata Consulting Engineers (TCE), Engineering and Consulting

    Amit Sharma, Managing Director & CEO

    15.

    Nykaa, Cosmetics and consumer goods

    Falguni Nayyar,CEO

    French Side:

      Company Name(Sector) Name and Designation

    1

    Air Bus, Aerospace & Defence

    Guillaume Faury, CEO

    2.

    Air Liquide, Chemicals, Health care, Engineering

    François Jackow, CEO & a member of the Board of Directors of the Air Liquide Group

    3.

    BlaBlaCar, Transport, Services

    Nicolas Brusson, CEO & Co-Founder

    4

    Capgemini Group, Information Technology, Engineering

    Aiman Ezzat, CEO

    5

    Danone, Food & Beverages

    Antoine de SAINT-AFFRIQUE, CEO

    6

    EDF, Energy, Power

    Luc Rémont, Chairman &CEO

    7

    Egis Group, Architecture Construction Engineering

    Laurent Germain,CEO

    8.

    Engie Group, Energy, Renewable Energy

    Catherine MacGregor, CEO & Board Member of ENGIE.

    9

    L’Oréal, Cosmetics & Consumer Goods

    Nicolas Hieronimus, CEO & Member of Board of Directors

    10

    Mistral AI, Artificial Intelligence

    Arthur Mensch, CEO & Co-Founder

    11

    Naval Group, Defence, Shipbuilding, Engineering

    Pierre Eric Pommellet, Chairman & CEO

    12.

    Pernod Ricard, Alcohol Beverages, FMCG

    Alexandre Ricard, Chairman & CEO

    13

    Safran, Aerospace & Defence

    Olivier Andriès, CEO

    14.

    Servier, Pharmaceuticals, Health care

    Olivier Laureau, President & CEO

    15

    Total Energies SE, Energy

    PATRICK Pouyanné, Chairman & CEO

    16

    Vicat, Construction

    Guy Sidos, Chairman & CEO

     

    ****

    MJPS/SR

    (Release ID: 2102056)

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News –

    February 12, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: Aero India 2025: CEOs Rountable receives unprecedent response with the participation of 116 global CEOs

    Source: Government of India (2)

    Aero India 2025: CEOs Rountable receives unprecedent response with the participation of 116 global CEOs

    Announcements made regarding plans for investments, collaborations and setting-up of development centres & Centre of Excellence

    Posted On: 11 FEB 2025 8:53PM by PIB Delhi

    The CEOs Rountable, which was graced by Raksha Mantri Shri Rajnath Singh on the opening day of 15th Aero India on February 10, 2025, received an unprecedent response with the participation of 116 global CEOs. Many foreign as well as Indian Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) made announcements regarding their plans for investments, collaborations and setting-up of development centres & Centre of Excellence etc. These include:

     

    • Announcement by Ultra Maritime & Bharat Dynamics Limited for signing of an initial contract for the co-production of US specification
    • Announcement by Bharat Forge for their plan for the manufacturing of Landing Gear for certain commercial aircrafts 100% in the country.
    • Announcement by Safran, France & Bharat Electronics Limited for their partnership for co-production of Hammer missile in India.

     

    Fifty eight (58) foreign OEMs including John Cockerill (Belgium), Airbus (France), Ultra Maritime (USA), GNT (South Korea), Mitsubishi (Japan), Safran (France), Liebherr Aerospace (France), L3Harris Technologies Inc. (USA), Thales (France), Lockheed Martin (USA), Martin Baker (UK) attended the Roundtable. The Indian OEMs included Bharat Forge Ltd, Adani Defence & Aerospace, Mahindra Defence Systems Ltd, Ashok Leyland Defence and Defence Public Sector Undertakings.

    During the meeting, Raksha Mantri invited the global OEMs to utilise the opportunities offered by the expanding Indian defence ecosystem and find targeted solutions & counter measures to the challenges emerging due to the volatile geopolitical landscape of today.

    The event was organised on the theme E.D.G.E i.e. ‘Enabling Defence Cooperation through Global Engagement’, based on  Business Centric Technology Development, Joint Ventures, Manufacturing Excellence Hubs, Industry Led Capacity Building, Joint Ventures, Co-Development & Co-Production and Technology Transfer.

    During the event, Raksha Mantri also inaugurated ‘Defence Testing Portal (DTP)’ and released a booklet on ‘Defence Testing Capabilities’ of the Directorate General of Quality Assurance (DGQA). DTP will enhance ease of doing business in defence testing by improving the visibility of defence testing infrastructure and improved transparency and accountability in conduct of defence tests. The booklet will serve as a guiding document for defence manufacturers and acts as a ready reckoner during important stages of defence procurement and delivery processes.

    A short film highlighting the robust Indian defence ecosystem and vividly capturing the remarkable evolution and strides of India’s Aerospace & Defence Sector, was showcased as a powerful testament to our unwavering commitment and bold vision for the future.

    *******

    VK/SPS/Savvy

    (Release ID: 2102023) Visitor Counter : 88

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News –

    February 12, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: Union Minister Dr. Jitendra Singh today inaugurated the 4-day International Conference on Governance dedicated to the theme “Next Generation Administrative Reforms – Reaching the Last Mile” organised jointly by the International Institute of Administrative Sciences (IIAS) and Department of Administrative Reforms Govt. of India.

    Source: Government of India (2)

    Union Minister Dr. Jitendra Singh  today inaugurated the 4-day International Conference on Governance dedicated to the theme  “Next Generation Administrative Reforms – Reaching the Last Mile” organised jointly by the International Institute of Administrative Sciences (IIAS) and Department of Administrative Reforms Govt. of India.

    An occasion of prestige for India since a conference of this nature is being hosted for the first time in India with participation of 55 countries from across the globe.

    Minister says, Not only India but the world today is discussing Viksit bharat and claimed that the transformative journey of India’s citizen-centric governance since May 26, 2014, the day when Prime Minister Narendra Modi had assumed office

    From Digital Inclusion to Space Missions Dr. Jitendra Singh highlights Governance Excellence at IIAS-DARPG Conference 2025

    India for the 1st time hosts IIAS-DARPG Conference 2025: A Landmark Event in Public Administration and Governance

    Dr. Jitendra Singh Unveils a Book titled “Viksit Bharat @2047- Governance transformed”

    Posted On: 11 FEB 2025 7:17PM by PIB Delhi

     Union Minister of State (Independent Charge) Science & Technology; MoS PMO, Personnel, Public Grievances, Pensions, Atomic Energy and Space, Dr Jitendra Singh  today inaugurated the 4-day International Conference on Governance dedicated to the theme  “Next Generation Administrative Reforms – Reaching the Last Mile” organised jointly by the International Institute of Administrative Sciences (IIAS) and Department of Administrative Reforms Govt of India.

    The event is an occasion of prestige for India since a conference of this nature is being hosted for the first time in India with participation of nearly 55 countries from across the globe.

    Dr Jitendra Singh highlighted the significance of the conference as a platform to explore innovations in public administration, governance, and policymaking. Addressing the gathering, Dr. Singh emphasized the theme of the conference: “Next Generation Administrative Reforms – Reaching the Last Mile.”

    Dr. Jitendra Singh also released a Book on “Viksit Bharat @ 2047” themed Governance Transformed.

    The Minister said, not only India but the world today is discussing “Viksit Bharat” and claimed that  the transformative journey of India’s citizen-centric governance since May 26, 2014, the day when Narendra Modi had assumed office as the Prime Minister of India. He highlighted India’s economic transformation, from being part of the ‘Fragile Five’ to a member of the ‘First Five,’ showcasing a remarkable shift driven by reforms in public administration and governance. Dr. Jitendra Singh noted India’s impressive rise in the Global Innovation Index, moving from 81st to 39th place—a leap he described as “quantum.”

    The minister further underscored key indicators of the success of India’s next-generation administrative reforms, citing the significant expansion of broadband connectivity, which now covers almost 80% of the population. He pointed to the Swamitva Mission, which enables citizens to map their land through drones and satellites, reducing dependence on revenue officials. These reforms, he stated, have translated into tangible improvements in the ease of living for citizens.

    Dr. Jitendra Singh also lauded the government’s push towards financial inclusion, citing the rise of digital transactions and direct benefit transfers as key milestones. With 46% of the total digital transactions occurring in India, he mentioned that over 16.8 billion transactions were processed in just one month of October 2024, highlighting the positive socio-economic impact of these reforms.

    The Minister praised initiatives under the Department of Administrative Reforms and Public Grievances (DARPG), including CPGRAMS, one of the best grievance redressal systems in the world. He also pointed to the launch of Right to Information 2.0, a new app enabling citizens to access information with a single click, and Mission Karmayogi, a capacity-building initiative for civil servants.

    In line with Prime Minister Modi’s vision of “Minimum Government, Maximum Governance,” Dr. Jitendra Singh referred to the abolition of interviews for Group C and D employees, emphasizing democratizing governance and providing equal opportunities for all.

    Highlighting India’s technological advancements in governance, Dr. Jitendra Singh noted that India is among the first countries to establish a National Quantum Mission and Open Network Digital Commerce. He also highlighted India’s space achievements, including the Chandrayaan Mission, which made India the first country to reach the Moon’s South Pole, and the Aditya L1 Mission, which has made India one of only three nations to have a dedicated mission.

    The Minister also celebrated India’s breakthroughs in healthcare, including the first indigenous DNA vaccine and India’s first HPV vaccine to combat cervical cancer. He further highlighted the indigenous development of the antibiotic Nafithromycin and the first successful gene therapy trial for hemophilia.

     Additionally, he shared that the Department of Atomic Energy installed a Faecal Sludge Treatment Plant at the Kumbh Mela, addressing the daily load of 1 million liters of faecal sludge

    Dr. Jitendra Singh also emphasized India’s commitment to global climate goals under the leadership of Prime Minister Modi.

    The IIAS-DARPG India Conference 2025 provides an invaluable platform for global scholars, policymakers, administrators, and academics to exchange knowledge and discuss the role of governance, technology, and public administration reforms in improving citizen services and public service delivery.

    The conference includes interactive sessions and plenaries, offering valuable insights and collaborative solutions for enhancing governance efficiency worldwide.

    The event was attended by key dignitaries, including Mr. Ra’ed Mohammed BenShams, President of IIAS, and Mr. Sofiane Sahraoui, DG IIAS. Other notable attendees included Secretary DARPG V. Shrinivas, DG IIPA S.N. Tripathi and Additional Secretary DARPG Sh. Puneet Yadav.

    This conference serves as a crucial global platform for discussing the future of public administration, governance reforms, and the role of technology in shaping the governance landscape.

    ****

    NKR/PSM

    (Release ID: 2101941) Visitor Counter : 16

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News –

    February 12, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: India-Israel Business Forum & CEO Forum Held To Strengthen Bilateral Economic Ties

    Source: Government of India (2)

    India-Israel Business Forum & CEO Forum Held To Strengthen Bilateral Economic Ties

    Meeting to enhance strategic partnership unlocking opportunities for trade, investment, and tech collaboration

    India-Israel partnership, built on shared values of democracy, economic resilience, and technological advancement: Shri Piyush Goyal

    Posted On: 11 FEB 2025 7:07PM by PIB Delhi

    Confederation of Indian Industry (CII) and Federation of Indian Chamber of Commerce and Industry (FICCI) in collaboration with the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT) and the Embassy of Israel, successfully hosted the India-Israel Business Forum and the 3rd India-Israel CEO Forum in New Delhi. These landmark events reinforced the deep-rooted economic and strategic partnership between the two nations, unlocking new opportunities for trade, investment, and technological collaboration.

    Addressing the gathering during the inaugural session of the Business Forum, Union Minister of Commerce & Industry, Shri Piyush Goyal reaffirmed India’s commitment to becoming a USD 30-35 trillion economy by 2047, aligning with the vision of Viksit Bharat. He emphasized the growing India-Israel partnership, built on shared values of democracy, economic resilience, and technological advancement, while underlining India’s zero-tolerance policy on terrorism and commitment to global peace and security.

    Highlighting India’s 10 key strengths in terms of 10 D’s, that define its economic potential, the Minister spoke about Democracy – Equal opportunities for all, Demographic Dividend – A young and skilled workforce, Diversity – A multi-dimensional economy with vast opportunities, Digitization – Rapid technological transformation, Decarbonization – Commitment to a green economy, Determination – A workforce driven by innovation, Development – A robust policy framework for growth, Dependability – A trusted global partner, Decisive Leadership – Bold economic reforms and Demand – A thriving domestic market.

    Minister Goyal also highlighted the digital prowess of India and how the country has been able to digitise very rapidly in Agritech and education and in every aspect of the economy. He emphasised that inclusive growth opens up a new set of opportunities leading to development of all regions of India. He mentioned that Israel could look upon India as a trusted and dependable partner, emphasizing the role of India during the COVID pandemic and how India has met every commitment.

    H E MK Nir Barkat, Minister of Economy and Industry, State of Israel said that the delegation to India Israel Business Forum was the biggest ever mission to any country from Israel. He said, “I want to mention that there is a special friendship between Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi and Prime Minister Netanyahu throughout the years with very strong Government-to-Government collaboration.”

    He underscored two important goals of the Forum. First, to get Israeli companies’ exposure and seek collaboration opportunities with India and the second is to discover what the Government from both sides can do to make the relationship between India and Israel even deeper.

    Minister Barkat also underscored the importance of India–Middle East–Europe Economic Corridor (IMEEC) and the India Israel Business Forum provides an opportunity to make that happen.

    Speaking during the inaugural session of the Business Forum, Shri Amardeep Singh Bhatia, Secretary, DPIIT, Ministry of Commerce & Industry, Government of India highlighted that India has a large market with skills across the spectrum including skills in designing of chips and research in pharmaceuticals, highlighting collaboration opportunities with the robust innovation ecosystem of Israel and enhancing FDI both ways.

    H E Reuven Azar, Ambassador of Israel to India mentioned how India and Israel can geopolitically secure their supply chains and secondly on discovering strategies to win the race for global competition. He highlighted that both countries can come together and form the partnership in high tech manufacturing, research & development and provide the outlook for future Israel-India partnership with the signing of the Mutual Investment Agreement in March.   

    The 3rd India-Israel CEO Forum witnessed strategic discussions between industry leaders, policymakers, and investors. The CEO Forum focused on expanding India-Israel business and trade relations, particularly in Key Areas of Collaboration like:

    • Technology & Innovation: Strengthening partnerships in AI, quantum computing, smart manufacturing, and cybersecurity.
    • Agriculture & Healthcare: Leveraging Israeli agri-tech and medical R&D to enhance food security and healthcare innovation.
    • Défense & Homeland Security: Deepening cooperation in defense manufacturing and security technology.
    • Energy & Water Management: Expanding joint efforts in renewable energy, energy conservation, smart grids, and sustainable water solutions.
    • Investment & Trade Facilitation: Enhancing FDI in both directions and fostering ease of doing business.

    Mr Avi Balashnikov, Chairman of the Board, Israel Export Institute said that “people sometimes talk about big India and small Israel but when I look, I see two giants with India giant in size and scale and Israel giant in new ideas.”

    Mr. Sanjiv Puri, President, CII mentioned several areas of collaboration opportunities including AI and quantum computing, renewable energy, water, and further mentioned about strengthening of India–Israel Industrial R&D and Technological Innovation Fund.

    The Israel India Business Forum saw participation from industry members of India and Israel. At the B2B interactions, industry members discussed potential areas of collaboration between the countries. The Forum saw 500+ B2B meetings.

    The India-Israel Business Forum & CEO Forum mark a significant milestone in accelerating economic cooperation, trade expansion, and investment-led growth. As natural allies, India and Israel are committed to fostering a future-ready partnership, driving innovation, and creating opportunities for mutual prosperity.

    *****

     

    Abhishek Dayal/Abhijith Narayanan/Asmitabha Manna

    (Release ID: 2101930) Visitor Counter : 73

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News –

    February 12, 2025
←Previous Page
1 … 397 398 399 400 401 … 531
Next Page→
NewzIntel.com

NewzIntel.com

MIL Open Source Intelligence

  • Blog
  • About
  • FAQs
  • Authors
  • Events
  • Shop
  • Patterns
  • Themes

Twenty Twenty-Five

Designed with WordPress