Category: COVID-19 Vaccine

  • MIL-OSI USA: Secretary Dev Sangvai and Partner Organizations Release Impact Statements Regarding Proposals that Threaten SNAP in North Carolina

    Source: US State of North Carolina

    Headline: Secretary Dev Sangvai and Partner Organizations Release Impact Statements Regarding Proposals that Threaten SNAP in North Carolina

    Secretary Dev Sangvai and Partner Organizations Release Impact Statements Regarding Proposals that Threaten SNAP in North Carolina
    hejones1

    Governor Josh Stein and governors from 23 other states released a letter  to congressional leadership Tuesday, warning of the impact potential changes to the Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program (SNAP) would have to millions of people across the country, including more than 1.4 million in North Carolina who depend on SNAP to put food on the table. In response, NC Health and Human Services Secretary Dev Sangvai and partner organizations released statements further emphasizing the critical need for this vital food and nutrition program in North Carolina. 

    Statement from Secretary Dev Sangvai: 

    “One in six children in North Carolina face food insecurity, unsure of where their next meal will come from. Programs like SNAP are critical in ensuring children and families get the food and nutrition they need to live healthy lives and thrive in school and in their communities. Without healthy food, people are more likely to get sick and end up in the emergency room. Shifting costs to states and local communities makes it more difficult to create a healthier and safer North Carolina and forces state leaders to make hard decisions. These massive cost shifts can’t simply be patched over with state dollars, especially in challenging budget years. We do not have the capacity to fill those gaps, and the people of North Carolina will feel the impact, eroding the health and wellbeing of communities across the state.”

    The North Carolina Association of County Departments of Social Services also released this statement in response to the proposals that would also shift costs to North Carolina counties. 

    “County social services workers in North Carolina are the front-line staff responsible for administering the SNAP program. We see every day how these benefits bridge food security gaps for families with children, individuals with disabilities, the elderly, veterans and others who are working low-wage jobs. Counties pay the cost of the non-federal 50% administrative share in the State’s model. This includes all staffing costs for processing applications, interviewing clients, conducting eligibility verifications, verifying work with employers, etc. Counties also pay the cost of training staff, monitoring their work, following up on payment inaccuracies and fraud. Adding additional requirements to the program drives up administrative costs. Cost savings could be better achieved through simplified regulatory rules and policies, modern technology solutions, and enhanced tools available to do the work. 

    Cutting SNAP benefits at their base and adding potential additional cuts based on a state’s error rates further harms a county’s ability to recruit and retain qualified staff to administer the program. Complex regulations and policies, outdated automation, and antiquated tools make it challenging to attract the new generation of workers. 

    These increased costs, along with the lack of a qualified and interested workforce and the increased work requirements, create a situation where it would be difficult for any County to absorb these funding shifts, and cuts would be impossible.”

    The North Carolina Association of County Commissioners released this statement regarding the increase in costs to the counties.

    “By reducing federal funding and shifting administrative costs to state and local governments, Congress would force North Carolina and its counties to replace tens of millions of dollars in lost revenue, either by generating new funds through increased taxes or redirecting them from other essential programs. Should the state be unwilling or unable to replace the SNAP benefit reductions, individual counties will be forced to choose between diverting funds from their own programs, raising local taxes, or watching their residents go without this important safety net. Local governments are most disadvantaged to replace SNAP funding; the best way to ensure our residents receive this benefit is to preserve federal funding.”

    The North Carolina Retail Merchant’s Association released the following statement about the impact to businesses and North Carolina’s economy.

    “SNAP is not only essential for millions of families struggling with food insecurity, it also plays a critical role in sustaining local grocery stores, markets, and food retailers across our communities. SNAP benefits help ensure customers can afford nutritious food, which keeps shelves stocked and businesses thriving. Cuts to SNAP would force states to carry unprecedented costs, risking reduced enrollment and less spending at local retailers. This would have ripple effects on jobs and the broader economy, particularly in rural areas.”

    Feeding the Carolinas, the association for the North Carolina and South Carolina Feeding America Food Banks, released the following statement regarding impacts to food banks and meal distributions across the state.

    “The seven North Carolina food banks, in conjunction with our more than 2,500 distribution partners, provided over 250 million meals to our neighbors in the past year. Even with this significant work, it is critical to understand that SNAP provides 9 meals for every 1 meal that the food banks deliver. In addition, our food banks are serving more than twice the number individualschildren, seniors, families, and veteransthan we assisted just three years ago. Federal cuts that have already taken place have reduced the amount of food we can distribute by millions of pounds. Proposed SNAP cuts and cost shifts to the states will result in decreased food assistance for some of our most vulnerable populations. Food banks will be the next line of response if this comes to fruition and we will not be able to fill the gap. We will have families using their scarce resources to purchase highly processed, unhealthy food, which is in direct opposition to the administration’s goals under Make America Healthy Again. The bottom line is that, if these cuts are made, we will have more hungry children, seniors, and families, and, in the near future, a population with greater health problems and a workforce that is less prepared to keep our communities’ economies strong.”

    El gobernador Josh Stein y gobernadores de otros 23 estados enviaron una carta al liderazgo del Congreso el martes, advirtiendo sobre el impacto que tendrían los posibles cambios en el Programa de Asistencia Nutricional Suplementaria (SNAP, por sus siglas en inglés) para millones de personas en todo el país, incluidos más de 1.4 millones en Carolina del Norte que dependen de SNAP para poner comida en la mesa. En respuesta, el Secretario de Salud y Servicios Humanos de Carolina del Norte, Dev Sangvai, y las organizaciones asociadas emitieron declaraciones enfatizando aún más la necesidad crítica de este programa vital de alimentos y nutrición en Carolina del Norte.

    Declaración del Secretario Dev Sangvai:

    “Uno de cada seis niños en Carolina del Norte se enfrenta a la inseguridad alimentaria, sin saber de dónde vendrá su próxima comida.  Los programas como SNAP son fundamentales para garantizar que los niños y las familias reciban los alimentos y la nutrición que necesitan para llevar una vida saludable y prosperar en la escuela y en sus comunidades. Sin alimentos saludables, las personas tienen más probabilidades de enfermarse y terminar en la sala de emergencias. Cambiar los costos a los estados y las comunidades locales hace que sea más difícil crear una Carolina del Norte más saludable y segura y obliga a los líderes estatales a tomar decisiones difíciles. Estos cambios masivos de costos no pueden ser simplemente remendados con dólares estatales, especialmente en años presupuestarios difíciles. No tenemos la capacidad de llenar esos vacíos, y la gente de Carolina del Norte sentirá el impacto, deteriorando la salud y el bienestar de las comunidades en todo el estado”.

    La Asociación de Departamentos de Servicios Sociales del Condado de Carolina del Norte también publicó esta declaración en respuesta a las propuestas que también trasladarían los costos a los condados de Carolina del Norte.

    “Los trabajadores de servicios sociales del condado en Carolina del Norte son el personal de primera línea responsable de administrar el programa SNAP. Vemos todos los días cómo estos beneficios salvan las brechas de seguridad alimentaria para las familias con hijos, las personas con discapacidad, los ancianos, los veteranos y otras personas que trabajan en empleos de bajos salarios. Los condados pagan el costo de la participación administrativa no federal del 50% en el modelo del Estado. Esto incluye todos los costos de personal para procesar solicitudes, entrevistar a los clientes, realizar verificaciones de elegibilidad, verificar el trabajo con los empleadores, etc. Los condados también pagan el costo de capacitar al personal, monitorear su trabajo, hacer un seguimiento de las inexactitudes de pago y el fraude. Añadir requisitos adicionales al programa aumenta los costos administrativos. El ahorro de costos podría lograrse mejor a través de normas y políticas regulatorias simplificadas, soluciones tecnológicas modernas y herramientas mejoradas disponibles para hacer el trabajo.

    Recortando los beneficios de SNAP en su parte básica y agregar posibles recortes adicionales basados en las tasas de error de un estado perjudica aún más la capacidad de un condado para reclutar y retener personal calificado para administrar el programa. Las regulaciones y políticas complejas, la automatización y las herramientas anticuadas hacen que sea difícil atraer a la nueva generación de trabajadores.

    Estos mayores costos, junto con la falta de una fuerza laboral calificada e interesada y el aumento de los requisitos de trabajo, crean una situación en la que sería difícil para cualquier condado absorber estos cambios de financiamiento, y los recortes serían imposibles”.

    La Asociación de Comisionados del Condado de Carolina del Norte publicó esta declaración sobre el aumento de los costos para los condados.

    “Al reducir los fondos federales y transferir los costos administrativos a los gobiernos estatales y locales, el Congreso obligaría a Carolina del Norte y sus condados a reemplazar decenas de millones de dólares en ingresos perdidos, ya sea generando nuevos fondos a través del aumento de impuestos o redirigiéndolos de otros programas esenciales. Si el estado no está dispuesto o no puede reemplazar las reducciones de los beneficios de SNAP, los condados individuales se verán obligados a elegir entre desviar fondos de sus propios programas, aumentar los impuestos locales o ver a sus residentes sin esta importante red de seguridad. Los gobiernos locales están en mayor desventaja para reemplazar los fondos de SNAP; la mejor manera de garantizar que nuestros residentes reciban este beneficio es preservar los fondos federales”.

    La Asociación de Comerciantes Minoristas de Carolina del Norte emitió la siguiente declaración sobre el impacto en las empresas y la economía de Carolina del Norte.

    “SNAP no solo es esencial para millones de familias que luchan contra la inseguridad alimentaria, sino que también desempeña un papel fundamental en el mantenimiento de las tiendas de comestibles, los mercados y los minoristas de alimentos locales en nuestras comunidades. Los beneficios de SNAP ayudan a garantizar que los clientes puedan comprar alimentos nutritivos, lo que mantiene los estantes abastecidos y las empresas prósperas. Los recortes a SNAP obligarían a los estados a asumir costos sin precedentes, con el riesgo de reducir la inscripción y el gasto en los minoristas locales. Esto tendría un efecto dominó en el empleo y en la economía en general, particularmente en las zonas rurales”.

    Feeding the Carolinas, la asociación de los bancos de alimentos Feeding America de Carolina del Norte y Carolina del Sur, publicó la siguiente declaración sobre los impactos en los bancos de alimentos y la distribución de comidas en todo el estado. 

    “Los siete bancos de alimentos de Carolina del Norte, junto con nuestros más de 2,500 socios de distribución, proporcionaron más de 250 millones de comidas a nuestros vecinos en el último año. Incluso con este importante trabajo, es fundamental comprender que SNAP proporciona 9 comidas por cada comida que entregan los bancos de alimentos. Además, nuestros bancos de alimentos atienden a más del doble de personas (niños, personas mayores, familias y veteranos) que hace solo tres años. Los recortes federales que ya han tenido lugar han reducido la cantidad de alimentos que podemos distribuir en millones de libras. Los recortes propuestos de SNAP y los cambios de costos a los estados resultarán en una disminución de la asistencia alimentaria para algunas de nuestras poblaciones más vulnerables. Los bancos de alimentos serán la siguiente línea de respuesta si esto llega a buen término y no podremos llenar el vacío. Tendremos familias que usarán sus escasos recursos para comprar alimentos altamente procesados y poco saludables, lo que está en oposición directa a los objetivos de la administración bajo Make America Healthy Again. La conclusión es que, si se hacen estos recortes, tendremos más niños, personas mayores y familias con hambre y, en un futuro próximo, una población con mayores problemas de salud y una fuerza laboral menos preparada para mantener fuertes las economías de nuestras comunidades”.

    Jun 24, 2025

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Warren Slams RFK Jr. For “Reckless” Decision to Fire Vaccine Experts, Presses on New Appointees’ Conflicts of Interest, Anti-Vaccine Views

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Massachusetts – Elizabeth Warren
    June 24, 2025
    New panel will meet for the first time tomorrow without ethics disclosures or conflict of interest guidelines in place
    “You have promised that, as HHS Secretary, you would root out conflicts of interest and promote ‘radical transparency,’ but you are failing miserably to meet this promise as you rush to impose your anti-vaccine agenda on the American public.”
    Text of Letter (PDF)
    Washington, D.C. – U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), on the eve of a key committee meeting,  slammed Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. (RFK Jr.) for his “reckless” and “shortsighted” decision to fire all 17 independent members of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) and replace them with eight members who appear to be hand-picked to advance RFK Jr.’s own anti-vaccine agenda. With the new panel set to meet for the first time tomorrow, Senator Warren pressed RFK Jr. on his own conflicts of interests, and those of his appointees, raising concerns about their ability to make public health decisions to benefit Americans rather than line their own pockets.
    The letter follows Senator Bill Cassidy’s (R-La.) push to delay the ACIP meeting, citing the appointees’ lack of relevant experience and apparent anti-vaccine bias.
    “As presently constituted, the committee lacks the qualifications and credibility to offer the nation credible advice on vaccines. You have promised that, as HHS Secretary, you would root out conflicts of interest and promote ‘radical transparency,’ but you are failing miserably to meet this promise as you rush to impose your anti-vaccine agenda on the American public,” wrote Senator Warren.
    As an expert panel of the CDC, ACIP is responsible for developing recommendations for the use of vaccines by the American public. Decisions made by the committee have significant implications, affecting parents’ confidence in vaccines, physicians’ recommendations on who should receive them, and insurers’ coverage decisions.
    RFK Jr. recently purged the entire nonpartisan panel, claiming — with no evidence — that all 17 members had conflicts of interest that prevented them from effectively serving on the committee. But RFK Jr.’s hand-picked replacements are known vaccine skeptics, appear to lack relevant training, and have their own financial conflicts that present serious conflicts.
    During RFK Jr.’s confirmation process, he specifically pledged that he would end conflicts of interest on ACIP and “create an honest, unbiased, science-driven HHS.” It remains unclear how — if at all — his new appointees have been vetted for conflicts of interest, and the short timeframe from their nomination to tomorrow’s meeting means it would have been impossible for them to go through the typically rigorous vetting process for committee members.
    “While you’ve declared that previous efforts to guard against conflicts of interest on the panel were insufficient, you appear to have made no effort to ensure that your hand-picked appointees even declare their conflicts of interest, let alone meet a heightened standard,” wrote Senator Warren.
    With the panel set to meet for the first time tomorrow, a financial disclosure for only one of the eight new members is publicly available on the CDC website, and it remains unclear how conflict of interest rules will be applied. The meeting agenda will be truncated because the new appointees are reportedly “not yet in a position to deal with all the agenda items.” Even so, the panel is set to discuss recommendations for multiple key vaccines, including RSV, COVID-19, Influenza, and MMR.
    RFK Jr. also has his own unresolved conflicts of interest. At his confirmation hearing, Senator Warren questioned him on his biggest conflict: a lucrative arrangement with the law firm Wisner Baum in vaccine-related cases. Senator Warren specifically raised concerns about RFK Jr. financially benefiting as HHS Secretary by strengthening anti-vaccine lawsuits — including by naming anti-vaccine members to ACIP.
    “Your decision to reconstitute ACIP with members that share your anti-vaccine views therefore raises questions about your and your family’s ability to cash in from the dangerous decisions the panel appears prepared to make,” wrote Senator Warren.
    To understand RFK Jr.’s “haphazard” decision to purge ACIP and replace its members with a hand-picked panel of “unqualified and unvetted vaccine skeptics with their own troubling conflicts,” Senator Warren pressed the Secretary for information on the termination of the previous 17 experts, the appointments of the new members, and processes for vetting and eliminating conflicts of interest.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Recruitment for Biological Assessors

    Source: United Kingdom – Government Statements

    News story

    Recruitment for Biological Assessors

    Biological Assessor, working on new marketing authorisations, variations of existing authorisations, and animal test certificates.

    We have a vacancy for three Biological Assessors.

    Job Title

    Biological Assessor in the Biologicals Section

    Grade

    G7

    Salary & Pension

    £59,900 per annum with Pension Scheme

    Annual Leave entitlement

    Commencing at 25 days

    Role

    You will scientifically assess quality, safety and efficacy data for new marketing authorisations, animal test certificates to conduct clinical field trials and variations for biological/immunological veterinary medicinal products including veterinary vaccines and novel therapy medicinal products.

    How to apply

    You must make your application via Biological Assessor in the Biologicals Section – Civil Service Jobs – GOV.UK where you will find a full job description.

    Closing Date

    21 July 2025

    Updates to this page

    Published 24 June 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI Africa: Protecting those who protect us: Ensuring vaccinations for health workers on the frontlines


    Download logo

    It happened in seconds. The doors of the health facility flew open. A young man was rushed in, barely breathing, his family screaming behind him. Blood was everywhere, on the floor, his clothes, the hands of those trying to steady him. And without hesitation, the health workers moved towards him instinctively. There were no questions asked, no moments wasted, just an instinctive rush to save a life, guided by their training and dedication.

    Later, we learned it was a suicide attempt. He had ingested rat poison. But in that critical moment, nothing else mattered to the health workers fighting to stabilize him. There was no time to ask questions, assess risks, or think of their own safety.

    As I stood there, watching, one thought wouldn’t leave me: What if this had been something else? What if the blood, later discovered to be palm oil, carried something more? What if the man was unknowingly infected with mpox, or another infectious disease spreading quietly through communities?

    This is the daily reality faced by health workers across Sierra Leone. They are the first to respond, the first to make contact, and the first to put themselves at risk, often without knowing what dangers they might encounter. When hesitation could lead to death, their instinct to save lives overrides every fear. They are the backbone of our health system, yet they remain dangerously exposed.

    But who ensures their safety? In Sierra Leone, mpox is not a distant threat. Since the first case was reported earlier this year, the virus has spread to all 16 districts. Thousands have been infected. Health workers are on the frontlines, not only caring for known cases, but often unknowingly exposed to patients who may not yet show symptoms.

    Mpox can spread through close skin to skin contact, bodily fluids, blood. The very acts of care, cleaning wounds, delivering babies, providing urgent treatment carry huge risks.

    Dr. James Squire, the National Incident Manager, summed it up clearly: “Our health workers are our greatest asset. If we lose them, we lose everything.”

    We have lived this before, and the painful memory still lingers. During the Ebola crisis, several health workers died. The loss was catastrophic, not just for families and communities, but for the entire health system that was already so fragile. We cannot afford to allow history to repeat itself.

    This time, we have a tool, we didn’t have then: vaccines. In a remarkable show of solidarity, the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), a nation familiar with the challenges of mpox and Ebola outbreaks extended a helping hand. With the coordination and support of the World Health Organization (WHO), the DRC generously donated 75,000 doses of mpox vaccine to Sierra Leone.

    Fatmata, a health worker at a district hospital, expressed it poignantly: “We rush into danger without hesitation. But at the same time, we have loved ones waiting for us back home. We want to continue serving, but we also need to feel secure.”

    When health workers are vaccinated, entire communities are safer. Economies thrive. And outbreaks are contained before they spiral. The ripple effect of protecting one health worker reaches far beyond the four walls of a health facility.

    Now is the moment. Every health worker in Sierra Leone – nurse, doctor, cleaner, ambulance driver, laboratory technician – must be vaccinated.  No one who steps into a space of care should be left unprotected.

    Dr George Ameh, WHO Representative in Sierra Leone, emphasized: “We are at a turning point. The vaccines have arrived. Now we must act. Every health worker vaccinated is one pillar strengthening the entire health system. This is one of the tools we have to halt the outbreak.” 

    The health workers who rushed toward that patient didn’t stop to ask whether it was safe. They acted because that’s what they do. They show up, every day, in every crisis. But showing up should not cost them their lives. This time, we have a chance to protect them before they pay that price.

    In addition to pre-exposure vaccination against mpox and post exposure management, heath workers and all frontline workers should always observe strict infection prevention and control procedures and use personal protective equipment (PPEs) when handling suspected and confirmed patients.

    Distributed by APO Group on behalf of World Health Organization – Sierra Leone.

    MIL OSI Africa

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Interview of Dmitry Patrushev to the newspaper “Komsomolskaya Pravda”.

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: Government of the Russian Federation – An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.

    Dmitry Patrushev: Environmental issues have no boundaries, no age, no political views.

    Dmitry Patrushev answered questions about environmental protection. What has been achieved this year? What still needs to be done? He spoke about this and much more in an exclusive interview with Komsomolskaya Pravda.

    Photo: Press service of Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Patrushev

    I. Ostanin: In 2025, the implementation of new national projects began. One of the areas is the environmental situation related to water bodies. I cannot help but touch on the topic related to the great Russian river Volga. This topic attracts a lot of attention, Komsomolskaya Pravda conducted a large investigation on this topic: previously built treatment facilities are working at only 5%… Dmitry Nikolaevich, what do you think about ways to solve the problem? How to keep the Volga clean?

    D. Patrushev: Environmental improvement of the Volga over the past six years has involved more than just the construction of treatment facilities. In addition, landfills have been eliminated and measures have been taken to increase the river’s capacity. This allows people to be provided with water during dry periods, including for irrigation.

    Regarding the treatment facilities, I will say that problems were indeed identified in this block of activities. At the finish line of the previous national project, when I was given this direction under my supervision, it became clear that a number of facilities were not completed.

    Moreover, not the most positive results were obtained as a result of inspections of the quality of wastewater treatment at already commissioned facilities.

    Throughout the past year, we have been systematically changing our approach to work. A headquarters was set up at the government site, where each facility was literally analyzed “under a magnifying glass.” Based on the results, a schedule was created for completing construction and reaching standard cleaning indicators. Monitoring of plan execution is carried out through digital tools. Therefore, any deviations are visible to both us and regional leaders. There were many other transformations. As a result, the dynamics of construction have increased significantly.

    For the future, within the framework of the new national project “Ecological Well-Being”, we have completely restructured the approach to project implementation. For example, now an object cannot be considered commissioned until Rosprirodnadzor confirms the required quality of wastewater treatment.

    I am convinced that responsibility for the implementation of projects should be increased, including at the local level. After all, it is there that one can see better what has been built and how it affects the environmental situation. The involvement of subjects should be not only organizational, but also financial. We have also taken this into account in the new national project.

    Let me emphasize that all objects will be completed and brought up to standard indicators!

    I. Ostanin: You said that the approaches changed when working within the framework of the new national project, but the geography of the work has also significantly expanded. As far as I know, now it is planned to include other reservoirs and rivers in addition to the Volga and Baikal.

    D. Patrushev: Indeed, through the federal project “Water of Russia” the improvement, one way or another, will affect almost all major waterways of our country. This will not only be new treatment facilities, but also the cleaning of more than 1000 kilometers of rivers, which will create comfortable conditions for millions of people living near water bodies. In addition, measures are planned to improve the condition of lakes and reservoirs.

    We pay special attention to events within the boundaries of cultural heritage sites, specially protected natural areas, historical tourist centers. As an example, I will cite the restoration of the rivers and lakes of the Gatchina Park in the Leningrad Region.

    I would like to note that we will continue to monitor all work on improving the health of water bodies at the government level.

    By the way, this year funds have already been allocated for the Krasnogorsk Irtysh hydroelectric complex in the Omsk region and the Elizavetinsky reservoir hydroelectric complex, the most important source of drinking water for residents of the Lugansk People’s Republic.

    I. Ostanin: Let’s continue by talking about the ecology of Lake Baikal. Many spears have been broken around this topic. How is it planned to build the development of the Baikal region?

    D. Patrushev: We must certainly do everything to preserve Baikal, our unique natural site.

    However, the territory needs to be developed, providing the local population with quality living conditions. Developing a policy on how to regulate this is a long-standing issue. The Ministry of Natural Resources is developing a corresponding bill.

    It was adopted in the first reading last year. However, some of its provisions required adjustments. Now the government’s amendments are ready. I will not make premature statements, but I expect a balanced decision to be made that will take into account the possibility of preserving the incredible nature of Baikal and economically developing the territories. I hope that the reasonable balance found will become a prerequisite for the sustainable development of these territories for many years.

    I. Ostanin: Development of ecotourism is another important part of the national project “Ecological Well-being”. The holiday season has arrived. Tell us how the authorities are going to develop ecotourism? What routes, directions, maybe even new resorts will appear?

    Photo: Press service of Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Patrushev

    D. Patrushev: Domestic tourism is currently experiencing a rapid rise. In 2024, Russia broke its own record for the number of domestic tourist trips, exceeding 90 million. But the President has ordered that this figure reach 140 million by 2030.

    I have no doubt that our national parks can become an excellent point of attraction for tourists. Over the past six years, the tourist flow to them has grown from 6 to 17 million people. As part of the national project “Ecological Well-Being”, we continue to create conditions for popularizing this type of recreation for people.

    To this end, among other things, we will remove unreasonable restrictions that hinder the development of tourism infrastructure in specially protected natural areas.

    By the way, the Ministry of Natural Resources is also developing cruise tourism. For example, today those who wish can visit national parks in the Far East and see natural attractions that are inaccessible to “land” tours in Khabarovsk, Primorsky and Kamchatka Krais, Magadan and Sakhalin Oblasts, as well as Chukotka.

    National parks and reserves also develop excursion programs – for example, for weekend routes, they equip walking trails, open visitor centers, and arrange the necessary infrastructure. For example, Sochi National Park offers tourists updated eco-trails this season. We aim to make national parks interesting and comfortable in terms of improvement.

    I. Ostanin: Preservation and increase of our pride, Russian forests, is one of the tasks of the national project “Ecological Well-being”. What is being done to restore forests?

    D. Patrushev: Russia is home to a fifth of the world’s forest reserves. Understanding this, we take on increased obligations to preserve and increase them. Over the past 6 years, the area of new plantings has reached almost 8 million hectares.

    And, contrary to the global trend, more forests appear in our country than disappear. We have maintained this dynamic for several years in a row.

    People, our caring citizens, make a significant contribution to forest restoration. This deserves special gratitude. The country annually holds the “Garden of Memory” and “Save the Forest” campaigns. Over the years, more than 350 million trees have been planted, and public figures, politicians, and guests from foreign countries have taken part.

    However, wildfires remain a serious challenge for many countries — and for us too. The areas annually engulfed in flames, despite all preventive measures, are still quite significant. The government, for its part, is doing a lot of work to reduce them. In 2025, regions have been allocated almost 20 billion rubles. Including more than 5 billion additionally allocated to the most “burning” subjects — Yakutia, Transbaikalia and Krasnoyarsk Krai. The regions, for their part, are also increasing funding.

    And, of course, forest conservation requires full control over the movement of timber. In 2020, the President set the task of creating a system that would make the process completely transparent. Much has already been done for this. Strengthening supervision and introducing digital technologies in the industry have made it possible to reduce the number of violations by 2.5 times in 5 years. We can now track the movement of timber from harvesting to final products and export. But the improvement of control mechanisms in this area continues.

    From January 1, 2025, data on the forestry complex must be entered into the new state information system (FGIS Forestry Complex). And from this year, all timber trucks must be equipped with the GLONASS system.

    This will allow us to more effectively suppress “gray schemes”, because in real time we can see every logging site and all special equipment. Monitoring of the execution of the President’s order will be constant.

    I. Ostanin: The so-called “garbage reform” is being implemented in the country. At what point are we? And what will be done to achieve the indicators outlined by the President?

    D. Patrushev: On the instructions of the President, we are developing a closed-loop economy. What does this mean? Firstly, by 2030, waste sorting should be 100%, secondly, we need to reduce the volume of landfill disposal by 50%, and thirdly, which is very important, a quarter of the waste should be recycled. Currently, approximately 55% of waste is sorted, and only 14% is recycled.

    Over the past six years, almost 300 facilities for sorting, recycling and placing solid municipal waste have appeared in the country. In order to achieve the required indicators, it is planned to build another 400 facilities by 2030. So that we can monitor how the subjects cope with this task at the federal level, a special headquarters is working on the government platform. And we will continue to work in this format.

    But we must understand that waste management reform is not only about large enterprises. It starts in our yards and will always be in the public eye. Everything matters here: how involved local authorities are, whether the containers are clean, whether there are enough garbage trucks in the region, how financially stable the regional operators are, whether everything is taken into account in the regulatory framework. We are consistently working on all these areas in dialogue with regional leaders, senators and deputies.

    I. Ostanin: Dmitry Nikolaevich, as is known, the activities of enterprises in the agro-industrial complex can also affect the environment. How can we find a balance between the development of our agriculture and a caring attitude towards nature?

    Photo: Press service of Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Patrushev

    D. Patrushev: Companies in the agro-industrial complex are no different from other industries in this regard. In particular, those that have the most significant impact on the environment must obtain comprehensive environmental permits. These are documents that indicate the compliance of production with certain environmental requirements and standards or confirm the existence of modernization plans.

    In general, agriculture is now one of the most advanced areas of the Russian economy. But at the same time, we strive for the industry to develop in harmony with nature and “be friends” with it. Much is being done for this in modern production facilities.

    Another example: since 2023, work has been underway to improve the efficiency of involving livestock by-products in production, including for the restoration of agricultural land fertility.

    I. Ostanin: Let’s move from ecology to issues of ensuring our food security. The production of agricultural products, in general, is growing; in recent years we have set records for the harvest of grain, rice, fruit and berry crops, etc. What do you think helped us not only maintain production volumes under sanctions, but also increase them?

    D. Patrushev: Today the industry can rightfully be proud of its status as a guarantor of our food security. The state has created all the conditions for this.

    The turning point in many ways was 2014, when the food embargo was introduced. Our president’s decision in the sphere of geopolitics created completely new opportunities for the economy. I have already spoken about this: Crimea is now ours, and – in relation to the agricultural industry – the food shelf. At the start, there were many concerns: skeptics predicted that we could be left without food.

    But the move towards domestic production allowed the agro-industrial complex to become the driver of the economy. Entire areas made a sharp leap. For example, we essentially rebuilt greenhouse vegetable growing. New super-intensive gardens were planted, which gave us their own fruits. We now have more than 9 thousand types of Russian-made cheese, and its production volumes have doubled.

    So the fears were not justified.

    It must be said that our farmers are a colossal growth point. The state, for its part, has provided them with the necessary support.

    In general, there are now tools for all categories of agricultural business – for large players and for the smallest farms. Last year, the government allocated 682 billion rubles to the agro-industrial and fisheries complexes!

    Today we are on the path to achieving technological sovereignty. A new national project has been created for this purpose (“Technological Support for Food Security”). It covers those areas of the agro-industrial complex and related industries where deficit positions still remain. This concerns selection and genetics, agricultural machinery and equipment. It is necessary to increase the share of domestic veterinary drugs and vaccines on the market, and develop biotechnology.

    And, of course, there are people behind any success. Therefore, we strive to ensure that the training of personnel keeps pace with the development of the high-tech and advanced industry that our agricultural industry is. At the same time, it is necessary to start educating effective farmers as early as possible, for which purpose agro-technological classes are created. In addition to general education subjects, children learn about farm animal breeding technologies, learn how to operate unmanned aerial vehicles and work with modern agricultural machinery. Children will be able to get their first profession in agriculture already at school. There should be 18 thousand such classes by 2030. We are waiting for young and motivated specialists.

    I. Ostanin: An alarming trend that we are seeing is that last year the prices of dairy products were rising, for example, butter. Now everyone is talking about potato prices. Why do we see sharp price increases for certain products from time to time? And what can be done to avoid this?

    D. Patrushev: It is important to understand several points here. The food market is sensitive to fluctuations in supply and demand. Last year, the demand for dairy products grew significantly. And not only from buyers, but also from the food industry.

    Our confectionery and cheese industries have increased their output. But this requires a large amount of dairy raw materials.

    And although farmers are steadily increasing the production of raw milk, at the moment the current volumes were insufficient. This caused a temporary imbalance in the market.

    The situation was stabilized, including due to the opening of supplies from friendly countries. A similar mechanism is used for some vegetables of the “borscht set”, potatoes and apples. But here too there is a fork. After all, the price directly depends on the harvest, especially if we are talking about products with a limited shelf life.

    For a certain period of time, potatoes have been rising in price. However, if you look at the statistics, you will see that the prices were not much different from the cost of a couple of years ago. The growth is due to the fact that in 2023 we received a record potato harvest – 8.6 million tons. Inevitably, prices for it fell. And the 2024 harvest is comparable to what was two years before. The cost is “recouping” its fall, because farmers cannot work at a loss. Now the new harvest is already beginning. At the same time, the sowing area for potatoes has increased this year. And at the moment, we see that the growth in prices for it has stopped.

    Therefore, we apply regulatory measures selectively and carefully. The main task is to systematically increase our own production, which the Russian agro-industrial complex copes with quite successfully.

    I. Ostanin: Dmitry Nikolaevich, it has been a year since you took the position of Deputy Prime Minister. What conclusions have you drawn for yourself and what would you call the most difficult thing about working in this position?

    D. Patrushev: One of the important conclusions is that environmental issues have no borders, no age, no political views. This is not just my opinion. The Nevsky International Ecological Congress was recently held, which brought together more than 70 countries, as well as representatives of specialized international organizations.

    We talked about the harmony of man and nature. All participants agreed that with such rapid economic development as today, man’s responsibility to the surrounding world is constantly increasing. The issue of ensuring a balance between the economy and ecology is very relevant. And this is what I am now constantly working with.

    Russia is fully aware of its responsibility to the world for preserving natural resources. Therefore, we take on increased obligations in relation to the environment. And we will maintain this vector.

    As for the difficulties, I think it is not timely to talk about them. Our country is solving problems of historical scale today. Everyone in their place must do everything and even more to meet this level.

    Basically, overcoming obstacles is a motivator that allows you to achieve more.

    Source –newspaper “Komsomolskaya Pravda”.

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI: KIF18A Inhibitor Clinical Trials FDA Approved KIF18A Targeting Therapies Market Report

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Delhi, June 24, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Global KIF18A Targeting Therapies Market Trends, Clinical Trials, Technology Platforms & Future Outlook 2025 Report Highlights & Findings:

    • First KIF18A Targeting Therapy Commercial Availability Expected By 2030
    • Highest Phase Of Development: Phase-I/II
    • KIF18A Targeting Therapies In Clinical Trials:  > 10 Therapies
    • KIF18A Targeting Therapies Clinical Trials Insight By Company, Country, Indication & Phase
    • KIF18A Targeting Therapies Market Development Trends Insight
    • KIF18A Therapies Technology Platforms Insight

    Download Report: https://www.kuickresearch.com/report-kif18a-targeting-inhibitor-kif18a-inhibitor-clinical-trials-kif18a-targeting-therapy

    The global oncology landscape is witnessing rapid progress in precision medicine, and one of the most lead nominees in emerging targets is Kinesin Family Member 18A (KIF18A). It is a mitotic motor protein that is essential for chromosome alignment during mitosis, which facilitates proper segregation of chromosomes. Its perturbation leads to genomic instability, which is a distinguishing feature of cancer. Extrapolations of KIF18A have also been seen in various cancers such as ovarian and breast cancer, with an association with prognosis, drug resistance, and the potential to metastasize. As a crucial protein involved in mitosis and overexpression in cancer, KIF18A is now a promising therapeutic target.

    Targeting KIF18A interferes with mitotic mechanisms in chromosomally unstable (CIN-positive) cancer cells, causing selective death of cancer cells. In contrast to conventional chemotherapies, which indiscriminately impact all proliferating cells, KIF18A inhibitors provide a more selective and less toxic option by taking advantage of cancer cells’ vulnerability to proper mitosis. The major approach is small molecule inhibitors that disrupt KIF18A’s motor activity, hindering it from modulating microtubule dynamics at the kinetochore. It leads to mitotic arrest and failure of chromosome alignment, ultimately triggering apoptosis in cancer cells.

    Clinical development is progressing well. Volastra Therapeutics, a forerunner in this arena, is developing two KIF18A-targeting molecules: Sovilnesib (AMG650), acquired from Amgen and underway in Phase I trials for platinum-resistant high-grade serous ovarian cancer, and VLS-1488, an in-house oral inhibitor in Phase I/II. Both molecules displayed favorable safety profiles and early anti-tumor effects, with particular efficacy in high-chromosomal-instability tumors. Volastra’s pipeline demonstrates the therapeutic potential of inhibiting KIF18A to treat difficult-to-treat cancers.

    Accent Therapeutics is also advancing with ATX-295, an oral KIF18A inhibitor in initial clinical testing for solid tumors such as triple-negative breast and high-grade serous ovarian cancers. Their biomarker strategy makes use of genomic instability markers such as whole-genome doubling to better optimize patient selection and optimize therapy outcomes.

    AI based drug discovery is providing additional impetus to this area. Insilico Medicine has utilized proprietary platforms such as Chemistry42 and PandaOmics to discover ISM9682, a new macrocyclic KIF18A inhibitor with high preclinical efficacy. The AI platforms facilitate rapid optimization of candidates with increased specificity and pharmacological profiles, highlighting the growing use of sophisticated computational approaches in drug discovery.

    Aside from clinical advancement, the market opportunity for KIF18A inhibitors is also robust. As precision oncology gains more attention, the therapies are well poised to capture the opportunity of targeted therapies, particularly in diseases that are refractory to current treatments. Various companies, including Nvidia-funded Iambic Therapeutics, Aurigene Oncology, Simcere Zaiming Pharmaceutical, and Amgen, are developing promising product candidates in preclinical phases.

    Overall, the KIF18A-targeted therapy market is changing very quickly, powered by strong scientific justification, initial clinical success, and novel development approaches. As additional preclinical and clinical information becomes available, the market has significant potential for strong growth, powered by partnerships, application of artificial intelligence and machine learning tactics, and the overall dedication to creating targeted and individualized cancer therapeutics.

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Europe: OSCE Presence presents feasibility study for Research Centre on Local Development at Gjirokastra University

    Source: Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe – OSCE

    Headline: OSCE Presence presents feasibility study for Research Centre on Local Development at Gjirokastra University

    OSCE Presence in Albania presents feasibility study for Research Centre on Local Development at Gjirokastra University. (OSCE/Shila Bandilli) Photo details

    On 24 June, the OSCE Presence in Albania, in partnership with the University of Gjirokastra, presented the findings of a feasibility assessment for a Research Centre for Local Development.
    The event convened academic staff, government representatives, civil society, students, and local stakeholders to discuss the pivotal role of research and data in supporting policymaking and fostering sustainable local development.
    The meeting was officially opened by Professor Jaho Cana, Rector of the University of Gjirokastra; Ambassador Michel Tarran, Head of the OSCE Presence in Albania; and representatives from the Municipality of Gjirokastra and the Agency for the Support of Local Self-Government.
    In his remarks, Ambassador Tarran, the Head of OSCE Presence in Albania, emphasized the critical role that academic research can play in addressing the complex issues confronting local communities. “Local governments are at the forefront of tackling challenges such as economic growth, depopulation, environmental degradation, and climate change. A dedicated research centre can provide the tools, analyses, and trained professionals necessary to support evidence-based decisions and build long-term resilience,” he stated.
    The feasibility study, conducted by an OSCE-contracted expert, is the result of extensive consultations with academic staff, municipalities, and local stakeholders. It identifies clear needs, opportunities, and potential models for the establishment of an interdisciplinary research hub designed to support policy formulation, local economic and social development, and regional capacity-building.
    This initiative forms part of the OSCE Presence’s ongoing support to strengthening local governance in Albania, by introducing new instruments and tools for co-operation among authorities, civil society, academia, and the business sector to foster sustainable and inclusive growth across the country.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Global: NHS to offer at-home cervical cancer screening – an expert explains what you need to know

    Source: The Conversation – UK – By Dipa Kamdar, Senior Lecturer in Pharmacy Practice, Kingston University

    Iryna Inshyna/Shutterstock

    Nearly one in three women and other people with a cervix in the UK don’t attend their cervical screening when invited. Yet this quick, routine test helps prevent up to 70% of cervical cancer deaths by detecting problems early — and if everyone took part, that figure could rise to over 80%.

    Since December 2019, England has adopted a more accurate screening method that tests first for high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV), the virus responsible for nearly all cervical cancers, rather than looking immediately for abnormal cervical cells. Recommended by the UK National Screening Committee, this approach allows for longer intervals between tests for those who receive a negative HPV result, typically every five years instead of every three.

    From July 1 2025, this updated screening schedule will apply to women aged 25 to 49 who test negative for high-risk HPV. Research shows that those who test negative are at very low risk of developing cervical cancer in the following decade.

    Since the announcement, some women have raised concerns online, often shaped by personal experience. One woman posted on Facebook:

    “I had a positive smear when I was younger. It had been negative three years earlier… Imagine if I’d had to wait two more years before finding out I was positive.”

    Others have echoed these fears, calling not only for shorter screening intervals but for earlier testing ages. With around 3,200 people diagnosed with cervical cancer in the UK each year, some wonder whether the change is rooted in science — or in cost-cutting.

    What is cervical screening?

    Cervical screening, previously called a smear test, is a simple, routine way to help prevent cervical cancer. It’s offered to women, some trans men and non-binary people with a cervix. The test checks the cervix (the opening to the womb) for early signs of change that could lead to cancer if left untreated.

    It’s not a test for cancer itself. Instead, it looks for HPV, a common virus that can cause abnormal cell changes. If high-risk HPV is found, the sample is then checked for abnormal cells, which can be treated before they develop into cancer. If no HPV is detected, the risk is extremely low.

    Why is the screening interval changing?

    Under the new system, those who test negative for high-risk HPV will be screened every five years, rather than every three. This brings younger people in line with those aged 50 to 64, who already follow a five-year schedule.

    Anyone who tests positive for HPV will continue to receive annual follow-ups.

    This shift is supported by strong scientific evidence. HPV screening is more accurate than the previous method, which only looked for abnormal cells. Studies show that people who test negative for high-risk HPV are at very low risk of cervical cancer for many years — making five-year intervals safe and effective.

    The HPV vaccine

    The introduction of the HPV vaccine in the UK has significantly reduced HPV infections, the leading cause of cervical cancer. Research shows the vaccine can prevent up to 90% of cases, and the latest version, introduced in 2021, provides even broader protection.

    Combined with screening, the vaccine has contributed to a 25% drop in cervical cancer rates since the early 1990s.

    Self-sampling kits

    Despite these advances, many people still miss their screening appointments due to embarrassment, discomfort, time constraints or cultural concerns. Starting in January 2026, NHS England will offer at-home cervical screening kits to women and others with a cervix who rarely or never attend routine screening.

    With more than five million women not currently up to date, the scheme aims to boost participation — especially among underscreened groups, including younger people, ethnic minorities, disabled people and LGBT+ people. Trials suggest self-sampling could raise uptake to 77% within three years, nearing the NHS target of 80%.

    The kits, sent in discreet packaging with pre-paid return postage, allow people aged 25 to 64 to take a simple vaginal swab at home. The sample is tested for HPV, and if high-risk strains are found, the patient is invited for further tests.

    Is the new schedule safe?

    For most people, yes. The longer interval means fewer appointments for those at low risk, without compromising early detection for those who need it. The test itself usually causes only mild discomfort or pressure, and light spotting can occur afterwards. If you’re concerned, your doctor or nurse can help.

    While some worry that five years is too long to wait, it’s important to remember that HPV testing is highly accurate – and annual follow-ups remain in place for those who need closer monitoring.

    Even if you’re not due for screening, it’s vital to know the signs of cervical cancer, including:

    • Unusual vaginal bleeding (after sex, between periods or after menopause)

    • Changes in vaginal discharge

    • Pain during sex

    • Pain in the lower back or pelvis

    If you experience any of these symptoms, don’t wait for your next screening – contact your GP straight away.

    Cervical screening saves lives. The shift to five-year intervals is backed by science and designed to keep people safe while reducing unnecessary appointments. If you’re invited, go – even if you feel fine. And if something doesn’t feel right, speak up.

    The aim is simple: catch problems early, prevent cancer, and protect lives.

    Dipa Kamdar does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. NHS to offer at-home cervical cancer screening – an expert explains what you need to know – https://theconversation.com/nhs-to-offer-at-home-cervical-cancer-screening-an-expert-explains-what-you-need-to-know-259299

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI Global: NHS to offer at-home cervical cancer screening – an expert explains what you need to know

    Source: The Conversation – UK – By Dipa Kamdar, Senior Lecturer in Pharmacy Practice, Kingston University

    Iryna Inshyna/Shutterstock

    Nearly one in three women and other people with a cervix in the UK don’t attend their cervical screening when invited. Yet this quick, routine test helps prevent up to 70% of cervical cancer deaths by detecting problems early — and if everyone took part, that figure could rise to over 80%.

    Since December 2019, England has adopted a more accurate screening method that tests first for high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV), the virus responsible for nearly all cervical cancers, rather than looking immediately for abnormal cervical cells. Recommended by the UK National Screening Committee, this approach allows for longer intervals between tests for those who receive a negative HPV result, typically every five years instead of every three.

    From July 1 2025, this updated screening schedule will apply to women aged 25 to 49 who test negative for high-risk HPV. Research shows that those who test negative are at very low risk of developing cervical cancer in the following decade.

    Since the announcement, some women have raised concerns online, often shaped by personal experience. One woman posted on Facebook:

    “I had a positive smear when I was younger. It had been negative three years earlier… Imagine if I’d had to wait two more years before finding out I was positive.”

    Others have echoed these fears, calling not only for shorter screening intervals but for earlier testing ages. With around 3,200 people diagnosed with cervical cancer in the UK each year, some wonder whether the change is rooted in science — or in cost-cutting.

    What is cervical screening?

    Cervical screening, previously called a smear test, is a simple, routine way to help prevent cervical cancer. It’s offered to women, some trans men and non-binary people with a cervix. The test checks the cervix (the opening to the womb) for early signs of change that could lead to cancer if left untreated.

    It’s not a test for cancer itself. Instead, it looks for HPV, a common virus that can cause abnormal cell changes. If high-risk HPV is found, the sample is then checked for abnormal cells, which can be treated before they develop into cancer. If no HPV is detected, the risk is extremely low.

    Why is the screening interval changing?

    Under the new system, those who test negative for high-risk HPV will be screened every five years, rather than every three. This brings younger people in line with those aged 50 to 64, who already follow a five-year schedule.

    Anyone who tests positive for HPV will continue to receive annual follow-ups.

    This shift is supported by strong scientific evidence. HPV screening is more accurate than the previous method, which only looked for abnormal cells. Studies show that people who test negative for high-risk HPV are at very low risk of cervical cancer for many years — making five-year intervals safe and effective.

    The HPV vaccine

    The introduction of the HPV vaccine in the UK has significantly reduced HPV infections, the leading cause of cervical cancer. Research shows the vaccine can prevent up to 90% of cases, and the latest version, introduced in 2021, provides even broader protection.

    Combined with screening, the vaccine has contributed to a 25% drop in cervical cancer rates since the early 1990s.

    Self-sampling kits

    Despite these advances, many people still miss their screening appointments due to embarrassment, discomfort, time constraints or cultural concerns. Starting in January 2026, NHS England will offer at-home cervical screening kits to women and others with a cervix who rarely or never attend routine screening.

    With more than five million women not currently up to date, the scheme aims to boost participation — especially among underscreened groups, including younger people, ethnic minorities, disabled people and LGBT+ people. Trials suggest self-sampling could raise uptake to 77% within three years, nearing the NHS target of 80%.

    The kits, sent in discreet packaging with pre-paid return postage, allow people aged 25 to 64 to take a simple vaginal swab at home. The sample is tested for HPV, and if high-risk strains are found, the patient is invited for further tests.

    Is the new schedule safe?

    For most people, yes. The longer interval means fewer appointments for those at low risk, without compromising early detection for those who need it. The test itself usually causes only mild discomfort or pressure, and light spotting can occur afterwards. If you’re concerned, your doctor or nurse can help.

    While some worry that five years is too long to wait, it’s important to remember that HPV testing is highly accurate – and annual follow-ups remain in place for those who need closer monitoring.

    Even if you’re not due for screening, it’s vital to know the signs of cervical cancer, including:

    • Unusual vaginal bleeding (after sex, between periods or after menopause)

    • Changes in vaginal discharge

    • Pain during sex

    • Pain in the lower back or pelvis

    If you experience any of these symptoms, don’t wait for your next screening – contact your GP straight away.

    Cervical screening saves lives. The shift to five-year intervals is backed by science and designed to keep people safe while reducing unnecessary appointments. If you’re invited, go – even if you feel fine. And if something doesn’t feel right, speak up.

    The aim is simple: catch problems early, prevent cancer, and protect lives.

    Dipa Kamdar does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. NHS to offer at-home cervical cancer screening – an expert explains what you need to know – https://theconversation.com/nhs-to-offer-at-home-cervical-cancer-screening-an-expert-explains-what-you-need-to-know-259299

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI: NUCLIDIUM Presents Positive Phase 1 Results of its Novel PET Imaging Agent 61Cu-NuriPro™ at SNMMI 2025 Annual Meeting

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    • 61Cu-NuriPro™ detected more lesions up to 4 hours post-administration in 50% of patients, not visualized by 18F-piflufolastat PET1,2
    • Dosimetry data highlight favorable tumor-to-background ratio with 61Cu-NuriPro™
    • 61Cu-NuriPro™’s 3.3 hours half-life allows for greater distribution range and later imaging after administration
    • Data presented on Monday, June 23 by Principal Investigator Dr. Gary Ulaner, MD, PhD at the SNMMI 2025 Annual Meeting in New Orleans

    Basel, Switzerland, June 24, 2025NUCLIDIUM AG a clinical-stage radiopharmaceutical company developing copper-based theranostics, today announced positive data from the Phase 1 clinical trial evaluating the company’s novel PET imaging agent, 61Cu-NuriProTM (61Cu-NODAGA-PSMA I&T) in patients with metastatic prostate cancer. These data were presented on June 23 at the Society of Nuclear Medicine & Molecular Imaging (SNMMI) 2025 Annual Meeting in New Orleans by Dr. Gary Ulaner, MD, PhD, Director of Molecular Imaging and Therapy at Hoag Family Cancer Institute and Principal Investigator for the trial. Dr. Ulaner highlighted 61Cu-NuriPro’s favorable safety, dosimetry profile and imaging characteristics in Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA)-positive prostate cancer patients.

    The Phase 1 trial conducted at Hoag Molecular Imaging and Therapy Clinic evaluated the safety, dosimetry and preliminary diagnostic efficacy of 61Cu-NuriProTM in patients with metastatic prostate cancer, and was compared to 18F-piflufolastat. 61Cu-NuriPro™ demonstrated a safety profile comparable to clinically established PSMA tracers with a favorable imaging performance. Notably, 61Cu-NuriPro PET visualized additional lesions in 50% of the patients which were not seen on the 18F-piflufolastat PET, with favorable tumor-to-background ratios. The number of detected lesions on the 61Cu-NuriPro PET increased up to 4 hours after administration, highlighting the diagnostic benefits of 61Cu’s 3.3-hour half-life and high positron yield.

    “Accurate and reliable imaging remains essential in the management of prostate cancer. The Phase 1 results from 61Cu-NuriPro™ demonstrate not only a solid safety profile but also good imaging quality compared to standard-of-care,” said Dr. Gary Ulaner, MD, PhD, Director of Molecular Imaging and Therapy at Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian and Principal Investigator of the trial. “These early data suggest strong potential for improving diagnostic performance and patient outcomes.”

    Leila Jaafar, PhD, CEO and Co-Founder of NUCLIDIUM added “These results further validate our first-in-class copper theranostics platform and the clinical promise of 61Cu-NuriPro™ as a potential best-in-class diagnostic. We are dedicated to rapidly advancing our portfolio of copper-based theranostic agents for a broader range of cancers, with a focus on safety, sustainability, and scalability.”

    61Cu-NuriProTM (61Cu-NODAGA-PSMA I&T) is the diagnostic component of NUCLIDIUM’s PSMA-targeted NuriProTM program2,3,4,5,6. The company’s second diagnostic, 61Cu-TraceNET™, targeting SSTR-positive tumors, is in a Phase 1/2a clinical trial in broncho-pulmonary, and gastroenterohepatic neuroendocrine tumors (BP- and GEP-NETs). The agent will be developed further for imaging in a subset of metastatic breast cancer patients. Clinical trials of two corresponding therapeutics, 67Cu-NuriPro™ and 67Cu-TraceNET™, are expected to start enrollment in early 2026.

    About NUCLIDIUM
    Nuclidium AG is a clinical-stage biotechnology company pioneering the development of next-generation copper-based radiopharmaceuticals for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer. Leveraging copper isotopes — Copper-61 for diagnostics and Copper-67 for therapeutics — Nuclidium is creating a differentiated platform with the potential to overcome existing limitations in radiotheranostics. With operations in Switzerland and Germany, the company combines innovative chemistry, deep clinical expertise, and strategic manufacturing capabilities to deliver scalable, accessible, and clinically superior theranostic solutions to patients worldwide. Nuclidium is committed to expanding the reach and efficacy of radiotheranostics, including addressing critical unmet medical needs in oncology and women’s health.

    For more information, please contact:

    NUCLIDIUM
    Leila Jaafar, CEO
    Email: info@nuclidium.com

    Investor/Media Contact NUCLIDIUM
    Trophic Communications
    Stephanie May
    Email: nuclidium@trophic.eu
    Phone: +49 171 1855682

    1 European Medicines Agency. Pylclari – International non-proprietary name: piflufolastat (18F), Assessment report-EMA/CHMP/279917/2023, https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/assessment-report/pylclari-epar-public-assessment-report_en.pdf, accessed 20 June 2025

    2 FDA Approves Pluvicto/Locametz for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. J Nucl Med. May 2022;63(5):13n.

    3 Keam SJ. Piflufolastat F 18: Diagnostic First Approval. Mol Diagn Ther. Sep 2021;25(5):647-656. doi:10.1007/s40291-021-00548-0

    4 Heo YA, Jadvar H, Calais J, et al. Flotufolastat F 18: Diagnostic First Approval Appropriate Use Criteria for Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET Imaging. Mol Diagn Ther. Jul 13; Jan 2023;63(1):59-68. doi:10.1007/s40291-023-00665-y10.2967/jnumed.121.263262

    5 Hennrich U, Eder M. [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-11: The First FDA-Approved (68)Ga-Radiopharmaceutical for PET Imaging of Prostate Cancer. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). Jul 23 2021;14(8)doi:10.3390/ph14080713

    6 Basaco Bernabeu T, Fani M, et al. 61Cu-PSMA–Targeted PET for Prostate Cancer: From Radiotracer Development to First-in-Human Imaging. JNM. Sep 2024, 65 (9) 1427-1434. doi: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.123.267126

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: NUCLIDIUM Presents Positive Phase 1 Results of its Novel PET Imaging Agent 61Cu-NuriPro™ at SNMMI 2025 Annual Meeting

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    • 61Cu-NuriPro™ detected more lesions up to 4 hours post-administration in 50% of patients, not visualized by 18F-piflufolastat PET1,2
    • Dosimetry data highlight favorable tumor-to-background ratio with 61Cu-NuriPro™
    • 61Cu-NuriPro™’s 3.3 hours half-life allows for greater distribution range and later imaging after administration
    • Data presented on Monday, June 23 by Principal Investigator Dr. Gary Ulaner, MD, PhD at the SNMMI 2025 Annual Meeting in New Orleans

    Basel, Switzerland, June 24, 2025NUCLIDIUM AG a clinical-stage radiopharmaceutical company developing copper-based theranostics, today announced positive data from the Phase 1 clinical trial evaluating the company’s novel PET imaging agent, 61Cu-NuriProTM (61Cu-NODAGA-PSMA I&T) in patients with metastatic prostate cancer. These data were presented on June 23 at the Society of Nuclear Medicine & Molecular Imaging (SNMMI) 2025 Annual Meeting in New Orleans by Dr. Gary Ulaner, MD, PhD, Director of Molecular Imaging and Therapy at Hoag Family Cancer Institute and Principal Investigator for the trial. Dr. Ulaner highlighted 61Cu-NuriPro’s favorable safety, dosimetry profile and imaging characteristics in Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA)-positive prostate cancer patients.

    The Phase 1 trial conducted at Hoag Molecular Imaging and Therapy Clinic evaluated the safety, dosimetry and preliminary diagnostic efficacy of 61Cu-NuriProTM in patients with metastatic prostate cancer, and was compared to 18F-piflufolastat. 61Cu-NuriPro™ demonstrated a safety profile comparable to clinically established PSMA tracers with a favorable imaging performance. Notably, 61Cu-NuriPro PET visualized additional lesions in 50% of the patients which were not seen on the 18F-piflufolastat PET, with favorable tumor-to-background ratios. The number of detected lesions on the 61Cu-NuriPro PET increased up to 4 hours after administration, highlighting the diagnostic benefits of 61Cu’s 3.3-hour half-life and high positron yield.

    “Accurate and reliable imaging remains essential in the management of prostate cancer. The Phase 1 results from 61Cu-NuriPro™ demonstrate not only a solid safety profile but also good imaging quality compared to standard-of-care,” said Dr. Gary Ulaner, MD, PhD, Director of Molecular Imaging and Therapy at Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian and Principal Investigator of the trial. “These early data suggest strong potential for improving diagnostic performance and patient outcomes.”

    Leila Jaafar, PhD, CEO and Co-Founder of NUCLIDIUM added “These results further validate our first-in-class copper theranostics platform and the clinical promise of 61Cu-NuriPro™ as a potential best-in-class diagnostic. We are dedicated to rapidly advancing our portfolio of copper-based theranostic agents for a broader range of cancers, with a focus on safety, sustainability, and scalability.”

    61Cu-NuriProTM (61Cu-NODAGA-PSMA I&T) is the diagnostic component of NUCLIDIUM’s PSMA-targeted NuriProTM program2,3,4,5,6. The company’s second diagnostic, 61Cu-TraceNET™, targeting SSTR-positive tumors, is in a Phase 1/2a clinical trial in broncho-pulmonary, and gastroenterohepatic neuroendocrine tumors (BP- and GEP-NETs). The agent will be developed further for imaging in a subset of metastatic breast cancer patients. Clinical trials of two corresponding therapeutics, 67Cu-NuriPro™ and 67Cu-TraceNET™, are expected to start enrollment in early 2026.

    About NUCLIDIUM
    Nuclidium AG is a clinical-stage biotechnology company pioneering the development of next-generation copper-based radiopharmaceuticals for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer. Leveraging copper isotopes — Copper-61 for diagnostics and Copper-67 for therapeutics — Nuclidium is creating a differentiated platform with the potential to overcome existing limitations in radiotheranostics. With operations in Switzerland and Germany, the company combines innovative chemistry, deep clinical expertise, and strategic manufacturing capabilities to deliver scalable, accessible, and clinically superior theranostic solutions to patients worldwide. Nuclidium is committed to expanding the reach and efficacy of radiotheranostics, including addressing critical unmet medical needs in oncology and women’s health.

    For more information, please contact:

    NUCLIDIUM
    Leila Jaafar, CEO
    Email: info@nuclidium.com

    Investor/Media Contact NUCLIDIUM
    Trophic Communications
    Stephanie May
    Email: nuclidium@trophic.eu
    Phone: +49 171 1855682

    1 European Medicines Agency. Pylclari – International non-proprietary name: piflufolastat (18F), Assessment report-EMA/CHMP/279917/2023, https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/assessment-report/pylclari-epar-public-assessment-report_en.pdf, accessed 20 June 2025

    2 FDA Approves Pluvicto/Locametz for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. J Nucl Med. May 2022;63(5):13n.

    3 Keam SJ. Piflufolastat F 18: Diagnostic First Approval. Mol Diagn Ther. Sep 2021;25(5):647-656. doi:10.1007/s40291-021-00548-0

    4 Heo YA, Jadvar H, Calais J, et al. Flotufolastat F 18: Diagnostic First Approval Appropriate Use Criteria for Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET Imaging. Mol Diagn Ther. Jul 13; Jan 2023;63(1):59-68. doi:10.1007/s40291-023-00665-y10.2967/jnumed.121.263262

    5 Hennrich U, Eder M. [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-11: The First FDA-Approved (68)Ga-Radiopharmaceutical for PET Imaging of Prostate Cancer. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). Jul 23 2021;14(8)doi:10.3390/ph14080713

    6 Basaco Bernabeu T, Fani M, et al. 61Cu-PSMA–Targeted PET for Prostate Cancer: From Radiotracer Development to First-in-Human Imaging. JNM. Sep 2024, 65 (9) 1427-1434. doi: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.123.267126

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Text adopted – Welfare of dogs and cats and their traceability – P10_TA(2025)0135 – Thursday, 19 June 2025 – Strasbourg

    Source: European Parliament

    Text proposed by the Commission   Amendment Amendment 1
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 1 (1)  Live animals, including cats and dogs are covered by Annex I to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and form part of the common agricultural policy of the Union. There is a market for these animals in the Union, including substantial cross-border trade. Many Member States are signatories to the European Convention for the Protection of Pet Animals. There is a wide range of evidence of sub-optimal functioning of the internal market for dogs and cats in the Union as well as of illegal trade in these animals within the Union and at import into the Union. Therefore, it is necessary to establish minimum requirements for the welfare of dogs and cats bred and kept in establishments, as well as strengthened requirements regarding the traceability of dogs and cats supplied in the Union. (1)  Live animals, including cats and dogs are covered by Annex I to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, form part of the common agricultural policy of the Union and their welfare should be protected. There is a market for these animals in the Union, including substantial cross-border trade. Many Member States are signatories to the European Convention for the Protection of Pet Animals. There is a wide range of evidence of sub-optimal functioning of the internal market for dogs and cats in the Union as well as of illegal trade in these animals within the Union and at import into the Union. Therefore, considering the findings on animals, which recognise their capacity for emotions, pain and social interactions, it is necessary to establish minimum requirements for the welfare of dogs and cats that are bred and kept in establishments, as well as strengthened requirements regarding the traceability of dogs and cats placed on the Union market. Amendment 2
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 2 (2)  The absence of Union welfare provisions on breeding, keeping and placing on the market of dogs and cats, as well as divergent national rules where they exist, have very often led to those animals being born, bred and sold or adopted at no cost, in circumstances detrimental to their welfare. Competition between commercial breeders of dogs and cats in different Member States is not conducted on a level playing field because animal welfare conditions are one of the main elements of the competitiveness of these operators and they differ considerably between Member States. As a consequence, competition is distorted, especially for high standards breeders and keepers, which are unable to monetise their investments into animal welfare when they trade cross border because they are confronted with operators that profit from sub-standard animal welfare conditions to exert competition and drive prices and standards down. (2)  Dogs and cats, with its own unique biological and behavioural needs, are traded and kept as pets in the Union. The absence of Union welfare provisions on breeding, keeping and placing on the market of dogs and cats, as well as divergent national rules where they exist, have sometimes led to those animals being born, bred and sold or adopted at no cost, in circumstances which could have serious detrimental consequences to their welfare. Competition between commercial breeders of dogs and cats in different Member States is not conducted on a level playing field because animal welfare conditions are one of the main elements of the competitiveness of these operators and they differ considerably between Member States. As a consequence, competition is distorted, especially for high standards breeders and keepers, which are unable to monetise their investments into animal welfare when they trade cross border because they are confronted with operators that profit from sub-standard animal welfare conditions to exert competition and drive prices and standards down. Amendment 3
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 3 (3)  Also, consumers are insufficiently protected as they are often confronted, when acquiring a dog or a cat, with the negative consequences of the poor welfare conditions in which the animals have been bred and kept in the establishments, such as health problems, behavioural problems or genetic defects of the dog or cat purchased or acquired. (3)  Also, consumers are insufficiently protected as they are often confronted, when acquiring a dog or a cat, with the negative consequences of the poor welfare conditions in which the animals have been bred and kept in the establishments, such as health problems, behavioural problems or genetic defects of the dog or cat purchased or acquired. To support informed consumer choices and promote compliance with Union rules, it is essential to inform the public and raise awareness of the difference between responsible and non-compliant or unlawful breeding practices. Amendments 280 and 307
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 3 a (new) (3a)   While several Member States have already introduced positive lists at national level to regulate the private ownership of animals, the absence of a common Union framework of welfare provisions on breeding, keeping and placing on the market of pet animal species other than dogs and cats, as well as divergent national rules, leads to inconsistencies, gaps in enforcement, confusion for consumers and, often, to serious animal welfare consequences for species that are unsuitable to be kept as pets, as well as risks to biodiversity, human health and safety and nature conservation. Amendment 308
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 3 b (new) (3b)   There have been previous calls to establish a science-based Union-wide list of animals that have been assessed as being suitable to be kept as pets, under appropriate welfare conditions, without causing harm to populations in the wild, and therefore to European biodiversity, or to human health and safety. In doing so, it is essential to ensure an assessment of the impact on animals, including their welfare, behaviour, dietary needs, and veterinary care, in order to avoid situations that could cause unnecessary suffering, inappropriate living conditions, or endangerment of species. Amendment 4
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 4 a (new) (4a)  Cooperation between Member States should be enhanced in order to identify illegal breeding establishments, dismantle associated networks, and ensure effective enforcement of applicable rules. Strengthening cross-border collaboration, information exchange and coordinated inspections is essential to address the transnational nature of certain illegal activities and to protect animal welfare and consumer interests across the Union. Amendment 5
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 4 b (new) (4b)  The number of companion animals in the Union has increased significantly over recent years, reflecting the strong attachment of Union citizens to the welfare of dogs and cats. In light of developments in animal welfare science, the Union and its Member States should be encouraged to promote a legal approach that reflects not only the status of animals as property, but also the ethical responsibility of humans towards their welfare and protection. Amendment 6
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 6 (6)  Illegal trade of dogs and cats has developed in part due to lack of traceability of these animals to the original litter. In turn, illegal trade practices are associated with suffering of dogs and cats subject to uncontrolled breeding practices. It is not possible to ensure that operators abide by the same standards of animal welfare, and to ensure uniform conditions of competition in the internal market in relation to the supplying of dogs and cats without reliable means to trace the animals to their origin. It is therefore crucial to ensure the traceability of dogs and cats by a system that identifies and registers dogs and cats before their first supplying in the Union as well as each time there is a change of ownership of the animals. (6)  Illegal trade of dogs and cats has developed in part due to lack of traceability of these animals to the original litter and to consumers’ enthusiasm for these animals, facilitated by the development of online purchasing. In turn, illegal trade practices are associated with suffering of dogs and cats subject to uncontrolled breeding practices. It is not possible to ensure that operators abide by the same standards of animal welfare, and to ensure uniform conditions of competition in the internal market in relation to the placing on the market of dogs and cats without reliable means to trace the animals to their origin. It is therefore crucial to ensure the traceability of dogs and cats by a system that identifies and registers dogs and cats before their first placing on the Union market as well as each time there is a change of ownership of the animals. Amendment 309
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 6 a (new) (6a)   This Regulation introduces mandatory registration, reinforced controls on online sales, and enhanced traceability of dogs and cats, with transition periods of up to 10 years in order to allow the relevant authorities to prepare. It further stresses the importance of Union-wide standards for responsible breeding to prevent detrimental health and welfare impacts on dogs and cats. This Regulation addresses these issues by establishing clear welfare requirements and ensuring that breeding practices uphold the highest standards. Amendment 7
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 7 (7)  Illegal trade in cats and dogs from outside the EU has been increasing. Current EU rules on the movements of dogs and cats into the EU, such as the provisions of Regulation 576/2013 and of the Animal Health Law, do not contain sufficient tools to prevent this illegal trade. This means that additional rules to fight illegal trade in dogs and cats are required. Existing animal health rules require that, both for commercial and non-commercial movement of dogs and cats entering into the Union, the animals must be identified with a microchip. To reinforce these traceability provisions, the owners of dogs and cats entering into the Union should ensure their registration in one of the Member States’ databases at the place of destination. This will provide for greater control on the movements of those animals. (7)  Illegal trade in cats and dogs from outside the EU has been increasing. Current EU rules on the movements of dogs and cats into the EU, such as the provisions of Regulation 576/2013 and of the Animal Health Law, do not contain sufficient tools to prevent this illegal trade. This means that additional rules to fight illegal trade in dogs and cats are required. Existing animal health rules require that, both for commercial and non-commercial movement of dogs and cats entering into the Union, the animals must be identified with a microchip. To reinforce these traceability provisions, the owners or persons responsible for dogs and cats entering into the Union should ensure their registration in one of the Member States’ databases at the place of destination. This will provide for greater control on the movements of those animals. Amendment 8
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 8 (8)  The traceability provisions of this proposal also contribute to the protection of public health via better animal welfare, better animal health, and better controls on the possible transmission of animal diseases (some of which being of zoonotic nature), this following a One Health approach. (8)  The traceability provisions of this proposal also contribute to the protection of public health via better animal welfare, better animal health, and better controls on the possible transmission of animal diseases (some of which being of zoonotic nature, some of which transmitting to wildlife, this following a One Health approach. Amendment 9
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 8 a (new) (8a)  Regulation (EU) 2016/429 of the European Parliament and of the Council regulates transmissible animal diseases for the purpose of avoiding the spread of such diseases in the Union. The health of animals is one of the five domains of animal welfare, and thus addressed in this Regulation. However, this Regulation does not address the diseases listed in Regulation (EU) 2016/429, but rather the state of health of dogs and cats as shaped by non-communicable diseases (for example injuries) or non-listed diseases (for example certain parasites). The rules laid down in this Regulation are therefore complementary to Regulation (EU) 2016/429 and do not duplicate or overlap with the rules laid down in that Regulation. Amendment 10
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 10 (10)  Regulation (EU) 2016/429 requires the identification of dogs and cats with a transponder but only if they are subject to movements between Member States entered into the Union. The identification required by that Regulation is not fully harmonised as it does not include precise standards regarding transponders. Furthermore, that Regulation does not require Member States to keep databases of dogs and cats. Therefore, Member States should be required to establish and maintain databases of dogs and cats supplied in the Union market to ensure the traceability of these animals. It is also necessary to ensure the interoperability of these databases. This will facilitate finding information on dogs and cats across the Union, as well as enable competent authorities to carry out official controls to ensure compliance with animal welfare rules. (10)  Regulation (EU) 2016/429 requires the identification of dogs and cats with a transponder but only if they are subject to movements between Member States entered into the Union. The identification required by that Regulation is not fully harmonised as it does not include precise standards regarding transponders. Furthermore, that Regulation does not require Member States to keep databases of dogs and cats. Therefore, Member States should be required to establish and maintain databases of dogs and cats placed on the Union market to ensure the traceability of these animals. It is also necessary to ensure the interoperability of these databases. This will facilitate finding information on dogs and cats across the Union, as well as enable competent authorities to carry out official controls to ensure compliance with animal welfare rules. Amendment 11
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 11 (11)  The supplying of dogs and cats, whether for profit or at no cost, has an impact on the internal market. Therefore, to prevent fraud, traceability of all animals traded in the Union market should be ensured and the keeping of animals in breeding establishments, pet shops or animal shelters should be subject to detailed rules. (11)  The placing on the market of dogs and cats, whether for profit or at no cost, has an impact on the internal market. Therefore, to prevent fraud, traceability of all animals traded in the Union market should be ensured and the keeping of animals in breeding and selling establishments, pet foster homes or animal shelters should be subject to detailed rules. The military, police or customs that breed or keep dogs for their own services’ use are not in such situation as they do not carry out their breeding or keeping activities for the market. Amendment 12
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 11 a (new) (11a)  The occasional supply of puppies and kittens by their owners who keep dogs or cats for personal or familial enjoyment and companionship and without any commercial intent or purpose, does not have a significant impact on the internal market and it is therefore justified to exclude such supply activities from the scope of application of this Regulation. Amendment 13
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 13 (13)  Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council4 regulates the keeping, breeding and supply of animals kept for scientific purposes including dogs and cats. Dogs and cats intended for scientific purposes should therefore be excluded from the scope of application of this Regulation. (13)  Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council4 regulates the keeping, breeding and supply of animals kept for scientific purposes including dogs and cats. Regulation (EU) 2019/6 of the European Parliament and of the Council regulates clinical trials for veterinary medicinal products involving the use of animals, including dogs and cats. Dogs and cats intended or used for scientific purposes as well as dogs and cats used in clinical trials required for the marketing authorisation of veterinary medicinal products should therefore be excluded from the scope of application of this Regulation. __________________ __________________ 4 Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes (OJ L 276, 20.10.2010, p. 33). 4 Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes (OJ L 276, 20.10.2010, p. 33). Amendment 14
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 14 (14)  A large number of dogs and cats will be covered by detailed welfare rules for the first time, which will allow them to benefit from better living conditions. However, considering the practical difficulties in certain cases to determine whether dogs and cats are kept as pets or for placing on the market or supply, this Regulation should exempt from certain obligations pet owners who keep a number of dogs and cats and produce a number of litters below a certain threshold. Otherwise, those pet owners would be subject to the relevant requirements of this Regulation, which would not be proportionate. (14)  A large number of dogs and cats will be covered by detailed welfare rules for the first time, which will allow them to benefit from better living conditions. However, considering the practical difficulties in certain cases to determine whether dogs and cats are kept as pets or used for agricultural purposes, such as herding, guarding livestock, farm protection, or for placing on the market or supply, this Regulation should exempt pet owners who keep a number of dogs and cats and produce a number of litters below a certain threshold. Otherwise, those pet owners would be subject to the relevant requirements of this Regulation, which would not be proportionate. Stray cats that roam freely and that keep rodent populations in check, have long been part of this rural balance and serve a functional and symbiotic role on agricultural holdings. Rural and remote areas, where access to veterinary services and compliance infrastructure may be limited, as well as the need to avoid imposing a disproportionate burden on farmers and small-scale breeders, should be duly taken into account. Amendment 15
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 17 (17)  Moreover, in the Union market different types of operators carrying out different types of activities supply dogs and cats. Aside from commercial breeders there are pet shops where dogs and cats, that are typically born and bred in other establishments, are kept for sale. The protection of these animals may be suboptimal, and there are no common welfare standards that need to be observed in these establishments. Given that pet shops are commercial operators that place on the market dogs and cats, it is therefore necessary to apply the requirements of this Regulation to these establishments. (17)  Moreover, in the Union market different types of operators carrying out different types of activities place dogs and cats on the market. Aside from commercial breeders there are selling establishments where dogs and cats, that are typically born and bred in other establishments, are kept for sale. The protection of these animals may be suboptimal, and there are no common welfare standards that need to be observed in these establishments. Given that selling establishments are commercial operators that place on the market dogs and cats, it is therefore necessary to apply the requirements of this Regulation to these establishments. Amendment 16
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 19 (19)  Despite the differences in the activities carried out by commercial breeders and pet shops, on the one hand, and animal shelters, on the other, they all supply dogs and cats in the Union market and there is a certain amount of overlap, especially at the level of the demand. When looking for a dog or cat, consumers make choices between buying an animal from a breeder (either directly or through a pet shop or intermediary), or adopting one from a shelter. The acquisition of dogs or cats directly from pet owners is marginal. One important factor in the choice of a dog or a cat is the possible behavioural or other problems that the animal may exhibit because of having been kept in poor welfare conditions and which may reduce their suitability to be kept as a pet animal, irrespective of whether the animal has been kept in a commercial breeding establishment, in a pet shop or in a shelter. Moreover, given that trade is also conducted by intermediaries and mostly online, consumers may not be aware before they acquire a dog or a cat of whether the animal originates from a shelter, a breeder or a pet shop. There is evidence that the number of animals supplied to the Union market by shelters is significant, in particular for cats. There is also evidence that animals are supplied from shelters in some Member States to prospective pet owners in other Member States, in particular for dogs. In order to ensure the achievement of the objective of this Regulation to ensure the smooth functioning of the internal market in dogs and cats, and the rational development of the sector while ensuring a high level of animal welfare, it is necessary to apply some of the requirements of this Regulation to shelters that keep a certain minimum number of animals, irrespective of whether they sell animals against payment or only supply animals for free or upon reimbursement of reasonable costs. However, for reasons of proportionality and given that the activities of shelters differ from those of other operators and may fulfil a public interest function, only some of the requirements of this Regulation should apply to shelters, concerning, in particular the number and competence of animal caretakers, housing, feeding and watering, behavioural needs and painful practices, and advisory visits by a veterinarian. (19)  Despite the differences in the activities carried out by commercial breeders and selling establishments, on the one hand, and animal shelters, on the other, they all place dogs and cats in the Union market and there is a certain amount of overlap, especially at the level of the demand. When looking for a dog or cat, consumers make choices between buying an animal from a breeder (either directly or through a selling establishment or intermediary), or adopting one from a shelter. The acquisition of dogs or cats directly from pet owners is marginal. One important factor in the choice of a dog or a cat is the possible behavioural or other problems that the animal may exhibit because of having been kept in poor welfare conditions and which may reduce their suitability to be kept as a pet animal, irrespective of whether the animal has been kept in a commercial breeding establishment, in a selling establishment or in a shelter. Moreover, given that trade is also conducted by intermediaries and mostly online, consumers may not be aware before they acquire a dog or a cat of whether the animal originates from a shelter, a breeder or a selling establishment. Providing such information could assist buyers in making informed and responsible choices. There is evidence that the number of animals placed on the Union market by shelters is significant, in particular for cats. There is also evidence that animals are placed on the market from shelters in some Member States to prospective pet owners in other Member States, in particular for dogs. In order to ensure the achievement of the objective of this Regulation to ensure the smooth functioning of the internal market in dogs and cats, and the rational development of the sector while ensuring a high level of animal welfare, it is necessary to apply some of the requirements of this Regulation to shelters that keep a certain minimum number of animals, irrespective of whether they place dogs or cats on the Union market against payment, for free or upon reimbursement of reasonable costs. However, for reasons of proportionality and given that the activities of shelters differ from those of other operators and may fulfil a public interest function, only some of the requirements of this Regulation should apply to shelters, concerning, in particular the number and competence of animal caretakers, housing, feeding and watering, behavioural needs and painful practices, and advisory visits by a veterinarian. Amendment 17
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 19 a (new) (19a)  Member States have observed the increasing use of foster homes by operators responsible for unwanted, abandoned, stray, lost or confiscated dogs or cats . Given that the number of dogs and cats kept in foster homes may impact the market of dogs and cats, foster homes should be covered by this Regulation. In such cases, the operators placing the dogs or cats in foster homes should be responsible for ensuring that the requirements of this Regulation are met in those foster homes. This could be achieved inter alia through the establishment of a contractual relationship between the operator and the foster family. Amendment 18
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 20 (20)  In addition, given the significant numbers of animals supplied in the Union by shelters, and the need to ensure the achievement of the objectives of this Regulation regarding traceability and prevention of illegal trade, shelters should also be subject to the requirements of this Regulation concerning identification and registration of dogs and cats, regardless of whether or not their activity can be considered economic in nature. (20)  In addition, given the significant numbers of animals placed on market in the Union by shelters, and the need to ensure the achievement of the objectives of this Regulation regarding traceability and prevention of illegal trade, shelters should also be subject to the requirements of this Regulation concerning identification and registration of dogs and cats, regardless of whether or not their activity can be considered economic in nature. Operators responsible for shelters should be encouraged to take appropriate measures to prevent reproduction of the dogs or cats kept in shelters. Amendment 19
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 23 (23)  In order to ensure proper enforcement of this Regulation, it is essential that competent authorities are able to identify the establishments subject to their official controls. It is therefore necessary that operators keeping dogs and cats in establishments notify their activities to the competent authorities. (23)  In order to ensure proper enforcement of this Regulation, it is essential that competent authorities are able to identify the establishments subject to their official controls. It is therefore necessary that operators keeping dogs and cats in establishments notify their activities to the competent authorities and that the competent authorities keep an updated register of these establishments. In order to minimise the administrative burden for operators, competent authorities should be able, for that purpose, to use information or data collected in the register of dogs and cats establishments under Regulation (EU) 2016/429. Amendment 278
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 24 (24)  Well trained and skilled staff are essential for improving the welfare conditions of animals. Competencies in animal welfare require knowledge of the basic behavioural patterns and needs of the species concerned. Animal caretakers should have the competencies in animal welfare relevant to their tasks and the animals they handle, in order to avoid inflicting pain, distress and suffering on dogs and cats. (24)  The distress and suffering of dogs and cats during training activities by untrained or poorly educated handlers can have detrimental effects on the behavioural patterns of dogs and cats, with possible risks to human health and safety and the environment. Therefore, well trained and skilled staff are essential for improving the welfare conditions of animals, including when breeding, keeping and handling dogs intended for military, police and customs services. Competencies in animal welfare require knowledge of the basic behavioural patterns and needs of the species concerned. Animal caretakers should have the competencies in animal welfare relevant to their tasks and the animals they handle, in order to avoid inflicting pain, distress and suffering on dogs and cats. Animal caretakers and relevant authorities, including government agencies should regularly update their competences through training programmes promoting training methods such as ‘operant conditioning’, prioritising positive reinforcement, instead of methods based on punishment. Amendment 21
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 25 (25)  Given the fact that animal welfare includes the health of animals, veterinarians are in the best position to provide advice to operators with a view to improving the animal welfare situation in establishments. Veterinarians should play an active role in raising awareness on the interrelationship between the health and welfare of those animals. Establishments keeping dogs and cats should therefore receive a regular animal welfare visit from a veterinarian. (25)  Given the fact that animal welfare includes the health of animals, veterinarians are in the best position to provide advice to operators with a view to improving the animal welfare situation in establishments. Veterinarians should play an active role in raising awareness on the interrelationship between the health and welfare of those animals. Establishments keeping a number of dogs and cats that exceeds a certain threshold dogs and cats should therefore receive an animal welfare visit from a veterinarian within the first year of application of this Regulation or within the first year of the notification of a new establishment, thereafter the visits from a veterinarian shall take place when appropriate, based on a risk analysis by the competent authorities. Amendment 22
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 25 a (new) (25a)  In order to ensure high level of animal welfare veterinarians maintain an appropriate degree of professional independence from the operator, as well as comprehensive education and ongoing training to stay abreast of scientific and professional advances. This training may, as appropriate, also encompass elements related to recognising instances of violence and animal abuse. Amendment 23
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 25 b (new) (25b)  Where veterinarians encounter circumstances during their animal health and welfare visits that could seriously affect the welfare of dogs or cats, they are encouraged, where appropriate, to notify the relevant authorities or to consider conducting a follow-up visit to assess the situation. Amendment 24
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 25 c (new) (25c)  Ending the life of dogs and cats should preferably be assisted by a veterinarian using methods that minimise pain and distress. In exceptional cases, such as when a hunting or livestock guardian dog is severely injured in a remote location where veterinary help is not accessible, other methods may be used, provided they minimise suffering to the greatest extent possible. Amendment 25
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 26 (26)  Certain breeding strategies may lead to welfare problems for dogs and cats. By selecting certain genetic traits for aesthetic or other marketing reasons, undesirable traits from an animal welfare perspective may also be created and passed on to future generations. Therefore, operators should take measures to ensure that their breeding strategies do not lead to such negative consequences for the welfare of the dogs and cats. (26)  Certain breeding strategies may lead to welfare problems for dogs and cats. By selecting certain genetic traits for aesthetic or other marketing reasons, undesirable traits from an animal welfare perspective may also be created and passed on to future generations. Therefore, operators should take measures to ensure that their breeding strategies do not lead to such negative consequences for the welfare of the dogs and cats. In particular, breeding strategies motivated by marketing objectives can result in certain types of dogs and cats developing ‘excessive conformational traits’. Since such excessive conformational traits can lead to significant health problems for the dogs and cats concerned, breeders should exclude them from breeding programmes. Amendment 26
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 26 a (new) (26a)  Aesthetic shows, exhibitions and competitions of dogs or cats have an impact on the market opportunities and price for selling dogs and cats. Mutilations and certain breeding strategies that result in dogs or cats with excessive conformational traits can be advantageous for breeders competing in aesthetic shows, exhibitions and competitions of dogs or cats. Organising and participating in such events can be driven by factors other than animal welfare, such as aesthetic standards, with the aim of advertising certain breeds and physical characteristics. In order to ensure that breeders prioritise the welfare of the dogs and cats they produce and in particular that dogs and cats do not develop excessive conformational traits and breeders do not perform mutilations to attain unhealthy aesthetic standards, operators of breeding and selling establishments and the organisers of such shows, exhibitions and competitions should not use or include dogs or cats with excessive conformational traits or those which have been mutilated for these shows, exhibitions or competitions. Amendment 27
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 27 (27)  Scientific evidence demonstrates that inbreeding has significant negative impacts on animal health and welfare. Therefore, inbreeding of dogs and cats including first-degree and second-degree matings should be prohibited, as this increases the incidence of inherited disorders and compromises immune system function, both of which adversely impact the health and welfare of dogs and cats. (27)  Scientific evidence demonstrates that inbreeding has significant negative impacts on animal health and welfare. Therefore, inbreeding of dogs and cats between parents and offspring, between siblings, between half siblings or between grandparents and grandchildren should be prohibited, as this increases the incidence of inherited disorders and compromises immune system function, both of which adversely impact the health and welfare of dogs and cats. Inbreeding should nevertheless be possible, when necessary to preserve local breeds with a limited genetic pool provided that it is authorised for that reason by the competent authority. Amendment 28
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 29 a (new) (29a)  Scientific evidence confirms that consistent access to adequate nutrition and hydration is fundamental for the welfare of dogs and cats. It is therefore appropriate to lay down minimum requirements for operators in this respect. Feeding and drinking facilities should be kept clean, and designed, constructed and installed in such a way as to ensure equal access for all animals, thus minimising competition and avoiding agonistic behaviour. Such facilities should also be designed to minimise spillage, prevent contamination of feed and water with harmful substances, and avoid any risk of harm to dogs and cats. Amendment 29
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 30 (30)  Scientific evidence is clear about the necessity for dogs and cats of having enough space to express their natural behaviour and having normal social interactions. This is not possible where animals are kept in confinement and in cages. The keeping of dogs and cats in cages should therefore be prohibited. (30)  Scientific evidence is clear about the necessity for dogs and cats of having enough space to express their natural behaviour and having normal social interactions. This is not possible where animals are kept in confinement and in containers for long periods. The keeping of dogs and cats in containers for long periods should therefore be prohibited, except if needed for the transport and temporary, short term isolation of individual dogs and or cats and during the participation in shows, exhibitions and competitions, for puppies or kittens with reduced thermoregulation capacity or puppies or kittens together with their mothers provided that stress is minimised and suffering due to extreme temperatures is avoided and the dogs and cats are able to stand and lie down in a natural position. Amendment 30
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 33 (33)  To prevent pregnancy complications and compromising their welfare, bitches and queens should only be bred after reaching skeletal as well as sexual maturity. To allow them to physically recuperate from pregnancy and lactation, bitches and queens should only be readmitted to reproduction after a sufficient period of time. However, to prevent certain pathological reproductive conditions in bitches and queens, such as pyometra, up to three consecutive pregnancies should be allowed, followed by an adequate recuperation period. Reproduction should gradually cease in bitches and queens coming into older age. (33)  To prevent pregnancy complications and compromising their welfare, bitches and queens should not be bred before reaching appropriate maturity. To allow them to physically recuperate from pregnancy and lactation, bitches and queens should only be readmitted to reproduction after a sufficient period of time. However, to prevent certain pathological reproductive conditions in bitches and queens, such as pyometra, up to three pregnancies litters within a period of 2 years should be allowed, followed by an adequate recuperation period, which should not be less of 1 year for bitches and queens that have delivered 3 litters, including stillborns, within a period of 2 years. Reproduction should cease in bitches and queens coming into older age and in bitches and queens that have had two cesarean sections, as it cannot be excluded that an additional pregnancy will have a negative effect on their welfare. All females used for reproduction should be regularly monitored by a veterinarian. Amendment 31
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 34 a (new) (34a)  Member States should lay down rules on effective, proportionate and dissuasive sanctions for non-compliance with this Regulation, including cases of abandonment of dogs and cats by operators. Breeding establishments that engage in abusive practices compromising animal welfare should, in particular, be subject to strong and dissuasive penalties. Such practices should be unequivocally condemned, and responsible persons should be prevented from continuing their activities in any Member State. Competent authorities should ensure that animals kept in such establishments are promptly removed and provided with appropriate care and protection. Amendment 32
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 36 (36)  Procedures with the purpose of altering the appearance of or preventing certain behaviours of cats and dogs, such as ear cropping, tail docking, removal of claws and resection of vocal cords, have a serious negative impact on the welfare of cats and dogs. These procedures cause pain and prevent cats and dogs from expressing innate behaviours. For this reason, they should only be allowed if performed by a veterinarian and only when necessary for medical reasons. (36)  Procedures with the purpose of altering the appearance of or preventing certain behaviours of cats and dogs, such as ear cropping, tail docking, removal of claws and resection of vocal cords, have a serious negative impact on the welfare of cats and dogs. These procedures cause pain and prevent cats and dogs from expressing innate behaviours. For this reason, they can only be allowed if performed by a veterinarian and only when necessary for medical reasons. However, for certain breeds, f.e. for hunting dogs, such procedures could be allowed for prophylactic, diagnostic and/or therapeutic reasons, and only if carried out by a veterinarian. In specific contexts and regions of Europe, tail docking may also be justified to prevent tail injuries, provided it is based on a full and thorough medical evaluation. Amendment 33
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 36 a (new) (36a)  Dogs used in the military, police and customs services normally undergo a very specific type of training to be prepared in the interest of national security. In order to have the possibility to attain the training deemed most appropriate, Member States should be able to grant derogations for dogs kept in breeding or selling establishments which are destined to be military, police or custom dogs. Amendment 34
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 37 (37)  The conditions in breeding establishments are particularly critical to ensure that dogs and cats are properly kept and treated before being placed on the market. It is therefore important that those establishments are approved by the competent authorities and are subject to onsite pre-inspection before their approval. It is also important that a list of those approved establishments is publicly available to allow potential buyers to verify the status of their suppliers. Since all establishments have an extended time for application of requirements on housing and health, it is necessary that the obligation of breeding establishments to obtain an approval should start to apply on the same date as the requirements for housing and health. (37)  Prior inspection of establishments by official veterinarians or other professionals, in case the official control task has been delegated, and consequent approval of establishments is an effective way to ensure that establishments comply with the requirements of this Regulation. However, given the limited availability of official veterinarians in Member States, it is not proportionate to require prior on-site inspection and approval for all establishments so that official veterinarians should focus on establishments representing a higher risk from the point of view of animal welfare. The conditions in breeding establishments are particularly critical to ensure that dogs and cats are properly bred, kept and treated before being placed on the market, in particular due to the consequences that poor animal welfare conditions at an early age can have for dogs and cats. It is therefore important that those establishments are approved by the competent authorities and are subject to onsite pre-inspection before their approval. It is also important that a list of those approved establishments is publicly available to allow potential buyers to verify the status of the breeding establishments and thus to strengthen public control and citizens’ awareness. Amendment 35
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 38 (38)  Some operators placing on the market dogs and cats, or shelters supplying dogs and cats, encourage potential customers to buy at any cost using emotional arguments, without mentioning to the potential owner the consequences of owning a pet animal. Other operators or shelters insist on the responsibility attached to pet ownership and this has the effect of limiting their ability to sell animals. This discrepancy of attitudes of operators tends to advantage less responsible operators, leading to distortions of competition despite the importance for animal welfare and public order of informing customers about their responsibility when buying a dog or a cat. It is therefore justified to require that all suppliers of dogs and cats in the Union market for use as pets inform future owners on their responsibility. In addition, where the supply of a dog or cat is facilitated by online means, an appropriate warning should accompany the online advertisement to efficiently convey the message of responsible ownership. (38)  Some operators placing on the market dogs and cats encourage potential customers to buy at any cost using emotional arguments, without mentioning to the potential owner the consequences of owning a pet animal. Other operators or shelters insist on the responsibility attached to pet ownership and this has the effect of limiting their ability to sell animals. This discrepancy of attitudes of operators tends to advantage less responsible operators, leading to distortions of competition despite the importance for animal welfare and public order of informing customers about their responsibility when buying a dog or a cat. It is therefore justified to require that all operators placing of dogs and cats in the Union market for use as pets inform future owners on their responsibility. In addition, where the placing on the market of a dog or cat is facilitated by online means, an appropriate warning should accompany the online advertisement to efficiently convey the message of responsible ownership. Amendment 36
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 39 (39)  Illegal trafficking and fraudulent practices in relation to the sale or transfer of dogs and cats for adoption is facilitated by the absence of traceability given the lack of identification and registration requirements for those animals. Furthermore, fraudulent practices may appear when the systems for the identification and registration of dogs and cats are not harmonised or cannot be easily operated because technical systems are not interoperable. It is therefore essential to harmonize the standards for the means of identification and registration and to ensure that the identification and registration of dogs and cats is completed before the animal is supplied in the Union for the first time. Suppliers of dogs and cats should provide evidence of identification and registration in one of the databases established by Member States for this purpose, before the first placing on the market of the animal in the Union. Subsequently, at every change of ownership or responsibility for the animal, the supplier must provide proof of identification and registration of the animal in one of the databases. For the sake of proportionality, natural persons supplying dogs and cats occasionally by other means than online platforms should not be subject to this obligation. (39)  Illegal trafficking and fraudulent practices in relation to the sale or transfer of dogs and cats for adoption is facilitated by the absence of traceability given the lack of identification and registration requirements for those animals. Furthermore, fraudulent practices may appear when the systems for the identification and registration of dogs and cats are not harmonised or cannot be easily operated because technical systems are not interoperable. It is therefore essential to harmonize the standards for the means of identification and registration and to ensure that the identification and registration of dogs and cats is completed before the animal placed on the Union market for the first time. Natural or legal persons placing of dogs and cats should provide evidence of identification and registration in one of the databases established by Member States for this purpose, before the first placing on the market of the animal in the Union. Subsequently, at every change of ownership or responsibility for the animal the change should be registered accordingly in one of the databases. For the sake of proportionality, natural persons supplying dogs and cats occasionally by other means than online platforms should not be subject to this obligation. Amendment 37
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 40 (40)  Suppliers of dogs and cats should not only provide evidence of identification, showing a document referring to the code of the transponder implanted in the animal but also evidence of the registration of that animal into an official database. This allows key information about the animal to be passed on to the new owner and ensures traceability. (40)  Natural or legal persons placing dogs and cats on the Union market should not only provide evidence of identification, showing a document referring to the code of the transponder implanted in the animal but also evidence of the registration of that animal into an official database. This allows key information about the animal to be passed on to the new owner and ensures traceability. Amendment 38
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 41 (41)  As most dogs and cats are currently offered for sale or donation by means of listings placed on online platforms, providers of online platforms should act diligently when intermediating access to dogs and cats. Therefore, without prejudice to Regulation (EU) 2022/2065, online platforms should be required to adapt the modalities of their listings for dogs and cats so that suppliers provide proofs of the identification and registration of the dogs and cats intended for sale or donation. In addition, the Commission should ensure the development of a system publicly available free of charge allowing to verify the authenticity of the identification and registration of a dog or a cat. This measure aims to better combat fraud by improving the traceability of dogs and cats supplied in the Union to their origin, allowing better controls by competent authorities and ultimately improving the welfare of these animals. This should not amount to an obligation for online platforms to generally monitor the listings offered through their platform, nor to a general fact-finding obligation aimed at assessing the accuracy of the identification and registration prior to the publication of the offer. (41)  As most dogs and cats are currently offered for sale or donation by means of advertisements placed on online platforms, providers of online platforms should act diligently when intermediating access to dogs and cats. Therefore, without prejudice to Regulation (EU) 2022/2065, online platforms should be required to adapt the modalities of their advertisements for dogs and cats so that natural or legal persons placing dogs or cats on the Union market provide proofs of the identification and registration of the dogs and cats intended for sale or donation. In addition, the Commission should ensure the development of a system publicly available free of charge allowing to verify the authenticity of the identification and registration of a dog or a cat. This measure aims to better combat fraud by improving the traceability of dogs and cats placed on the Union to their origin, allowing better controls by competent authorities and ultimately improving the welfare of these animals. This should not amount to an obligation for online platforms to generally monitor the listings offered through their platform, nor to a general fact-finding obligation aimed at assessing the accuracy of the identification and registration prior to the publication of the offer. Amendment 39
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 43 (43)  To ensure traceability of dogs and cats, animals should not only be marked with a unique identifier in the form of transponder, but their identification should also be registered in a database. Therefore, Member States that do not yet have national databases for dogs and cats should establish such databases so that identification can be reliable and verified. In addition, to ensure traceability within the Union, these national databases should be interoperable, allowing competent authorities and relevant stakeholders to verify the authenticity of the identification. (43)  To ensure traceability of dogs and cats, they should not only be individually identified with a unique identifier in the form of a transponder, but their identification should also be registered in a database. Therefore, Member States should be required to establish and maintain databases of dogs and cats placed on the Union market to ensure the traceability of these animals. It is also necessary to ensure the interoperability of these databases. This will make it easier for information on dogs and cats to be accessed across the Union, as well as enable competent authorities to carry out official checks to ensure compliance with animal welfare rules. In order to facilitate the interoperability between national databases, the Commission should establish an index database. Amendment 40
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 44 a (new) (44a)  In order to streamline cross-border movements of identified and registered dogs and cats, and to ensure timely access by veterinarians to relevant medical information, Member States are encouraged to establish a digital passport system. This digital document should include essential data on the animal’s identification and vaccination status, thereby enhancing both animal health management and administrative efficiency. Amendment 41
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 44 b (new) (44b)  The data protection in relation to the processing of personal data is a fundamental right. Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council lays down rules on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies and on the free movement of such data. Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council applies to the processing of personal data carried out by Member States in the course of the relevant procedures. Amendment 42
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 44 c (new) (44c)  The data protection in relation to the processing of personal data is a fundamental right. Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council lays down rules on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies and on the free movement of such data. Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council applies to the processing of personal data carried out by Member States in the course of the relevant procedures. The roles of the Commission and of the Member States in relation to the processing of personal data in cases under this Regulation need to be defined clearly in order to ensure a high level of data protection. Amendment 43
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 46 (46)  The provisions mentioned in the previous recital should be enforced through a listing of third countries approved to supply of dogs and cats to the Union based on a Commission assessment of the reliability of their official controls to enforce the animal welfare rules required under this Regulation, or equivalent rules, in establishments on their territory which supply or intend to supply dogs and cats to the Union. In addition, a list of establishments breeding and keeping dogs and cats in those third countries, and which are allowed to export those animals to the Union, should be established to ensure traceability and controls at Union Border Control Posts. The Commission should, following a risk-based approach, carry out audits of the reliability of official control system of third countries approved under this Regulation as well as those requesting to be approved under this Regulation. (46)  Enforcement of import rules should be ensured through a listing of third countries approved to place dogs and cats on the Union market based on a Commission assessment of the reliability of their official controls to enforce the animal welfare rules required under this Regulation, or recognised by the Union as equivalent rules, in establishments on their territory which export or intend to export dogs and cats to the Union market. In addition, a list of establishments breeding and keeping dogs and cats in those third countries, and which are allowed to export those animals to the Union, should be established to ensure traceability and controls at Union Border Control Posts. The Commission should, following a risk-based approach, carry out audits of the reliability of official control system of third countries approved under this Regulation as well as those requesting to be approved under this Regulation. Lastly, compliance with the relevant rules of this Regulation or with rules recognised by the Union as equivalent rules should be certified in the relevant health certificate used for such exports. For that purpose, the Commission should endeavour to amend the relevant model of official certificate, in order to include the related animal welfare attestation. Amendment 44
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 46 a (new) (46a)  To enhance consumer protection and to ensure the proper traceability of imports of dogs and cats into the Union, it is appropriate to require that they be identified before their entry and that the importers ensure their registration in one of the Member States’ databases. This will result in greater control on the movements of those animals. Furthermore, the EU Coordinated Action on the illegal trade of cats and dogs carried out in 2022 and 2023 demonstrated that one of the common fraudulent practices with the trade in dogs and cats consists in importing into the Union dogs and cats intended for trade claiming that those movements are non-commercial movements as defined by Union animal health rules, namely movements of dogs and cats accompanying their owners or a person authorised by the owner without the intention to transfer ownership. In order to provide tools for Member States to perform risk-based checks targeting this fraudulent practice, it is essential that the entry of dogs and cats as non-commercial be pre-notified through a dedicated Union pet travellers’ database. This database should collect notifications for all such entries into the Union regardless of the point of entry, for Member States to have the necessary overview and detect suspicious movements. For that reason it is appropriate that the Commission establish and maintain that database so that Member States have access to all available information for their checks. Amendment 45
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 47 (47)  Under Regulation (EU) 2016/429, a list of third countries authorised for the purpose of entry into the Union of dogs and cats is established for the purpose of managing the risk of introducing transmissible animal diseases into the Union. The list of third countries mentioned in the previous recital should therefore be limited to third countries authorised under Regulation (EU) 2016/429 and which provide appropriate guarantees of the capacity of their competent authority to control and ensure compliance of the establishments breeding and keeping dogs and cats for export to the Union with the animal welfare requirements set out in this Regulation. (47)  Under Regulation (EU) 2016/429, a list of third countries authorised for the purpose of entry into the Union of dogs and cats is established for the purpose of managing the risk of introducing transmissible animal diseases into the Union. The list of third countries mentioned in recital 46 should therefore be limited to third countries authorised under Regulation (EU) 2016/429 and which provide appropriate guarantees of the capacity of their competent authority to control and ensure compliance of the establishments breeding and keeping dogs and cats for export to the Union with the animal welfare requirements set out in this Regulation. Amendment 46
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 47 a (new) (47a)  In order to effectively trace the origin of the dog or a cat in the third country and to address illegal imports into the Union and fraudulent practices under the pretext of non-commercial movements as defined by Union Animal Health rules, it is important that dogs and cats are imported from third countries in compliance with this Regulation as regards their registration into a Member State database within 2 working days after their entry into the Union. Amendment 47
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 48 (48)  In order to take into account technical progress and scientific developments, and their social, economic and environmental impacts, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU should be delegated to the Commission for the purpose of amending Article 6 to this Regulation so that breeding strategies do not result in genotypes that have detrimental effects on the health or welfare of the dogs and cats. (48)  In order to take into account technical progress and scientific developments, especially the opinions of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), and their social, economic and environmental impacts, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU should be delegated to the Commission for the purpose of supplementing Article 6a of this Regulation to define the characteristics of genotypes, phenotypes, and excessive conformational traits that should be excluded from reproduction, so that breeding strategies do not result in genotypes that have detrimental effects on the health or welfare of the dogs and cats. In the context of aesthetic shows, exhibitions, and competitions, after considering both EFSA’s scientific opinion and the specific social and economic circumstances of the sector, the delegated acts should reflect a progressive and balanced approach, in order to ensure proportionate and practically achievable implementation.” Amendment 48
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 52 – indent 2 –  Article 17(5) to specify the information to be provided by suppliers as proof of identification and registration of dogs and cats, both in cases where they are offered through online platforms and by other means; deleted Amendment 49
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 52 – indent 6 –  Article 21(5) to establish a procedure for the recognition by the Union of equivalence of the conditions under which dogs and cats are bred and kept in establishments in a third country which intends to export animals to the Union, with the provisions of this Regulation regarding establishments. deleted Amendment 50
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 53 a (new) (53a)  The Member states may consider raising awareness about animal welfare and responsible animal care. Amendment 51
    Proposal for a regulation
    Recital 55 (55)  It is essential that Union legislation is subject to regular monitoring and evaluation so it can be adjusted in order to achieve the expected impacts. Therefore, this Regulation should contain an obligation for the Commission to perform monitoring on the welfare of dogs and cats in the Union and to carry out an evaluation to be presented to other Union institutions. (55)  It is essential that Union legislation is subject to regular monitoring and evaluation so it can be adjusted in order to achieve the expected impacts. Therefore, this Regulation should contain an obligation for the Commission to perform monitoring on the welfare of dogs and cats in the Union and to carry out an evaluation to be presented to other Union institutions. The evaluation should asses the technological and scientific developments that have occurred, including the means of identification of dogs or cats and the possibility of using alternative means which are less invasive than the implantation of a transponder. The evaluation should also guarantee the fraud-proof and robust character of the Union’s traceability system as well as the proportionality of the cost of identification for natural and legal persons subjected to the identification obligation under this Regulation. Amendments 282 and 311
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point b (b)  the traceability of dogs and cats placed on the Union market or supplied in the Union. (b)  the traceability of dogs and cats bred or kept in the Union or placed on the Union market. Amendment 53
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 2 – paragraph 1 1.  This Regulation shall apply to the breeding, keeping and placing on the market of dogs and cats, as well as their supplying in the Union. 1.  This Regulation shall apply to the breeding, keeping, placing on the market and entry into the Union of dogs and cats. Amendment 54
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 2 – paragraph 2 2.  This Regulation shall not apply to the breeding, keeping, placing on the market or supplying of dogs or cats intended for scientific purposes. 2.  This Regulation shall not apply to the breeding, keeping, placing on the market or supplying of dogs or cats intended for scientific purposes or for clinical trials required for the marketing authorisation of veterinary medicinal products. Amendment 55
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 2 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a.  This Regulation shall not apply to: –  natural persons who keep dogs or cats for personal or familial enjoyment and companionship, and who allow such animals to reproduce, limited to a maximum of one litter per species per household, per 18 months, without placing them on the market; –  and to agricultural holdings, with the exception of the provisions laid down under Article 5. Amendment 284
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 2 – paragraph 2 b (new) 2b.   Notwithstanding paragraph 2 of this Article, the requirements relating to identification and registration laid down in Article 17 shall apply to all dogs and cats held under the responsibility of natural persons. Amendment 56
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new) 1a.  ‘Dogs that perform specific, working or professional activities’: means those animals which, having been selected for their physical, instinctive and temperamental qualities, are trained to assist people in a regulated activity or specific task, such as those used for hunting, working, herding, rescue, assistance or for sporting purposes or those used by law enforcement agencies, as well as guide animals, guide dogs or animals intended for zootherapy that have been trained in centres or by specialised professionals to support, guide and assist people with functional diversities; Amendment 57
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3 a (new) 3a.  “breeding” means the activity of keeping dogs or cats in breeding establishments for the purpose of reproduction; Amendment 58
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3 b (new) 3b.  “advertising” means any form of communication which has the direct or indirect effect of promoting a dog or cat in order to attract interest, engagement or sales, including the promotion of a breed or a physical characteristic; Amendment 59
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4 4.  ‘keeping’ means any activity during which an animal is detained or handled in an establishment; 4.  ‘keeping’ means any activity during which dogs and cats are held, housed, detained or handled in an establishment or under the responsibility of an operator; Amendment 303
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 5 5.  ‘placing on the market’ means the keeping of dogs and cats for the purpose of sale, offering for sale, distribution or any other form of transfer of ownership or responsibility for the animal, that is against consideration or at least reimbursement of the costs incurred, including the advertising of animals for the above purposes; 5.  ‘placing on the market’ means the sale, offering for sale, distribution or any other form of transfer of ownership or responsibility, whether in return for payment or free of charge, excluding occasional and irregular donations of small numbers of dogs and cats by natural persons by means other than via the intermediation of an online platform, as well as the advertising of animals for the above purposes; Amendment 61
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 6 6.  ‘supplying’ means the transferring of ownership or responsibility for dogs or cats through any means or form, whether for a consideration or not, excluding occasional supplies by natural persons of dogs or cats by other means than via the intermediation of an online platform; deleted Amendment 62
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 7 7.  ‘online platforms’ means an online platform, as defined in Article 3, point (i), of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065, intermediating the placing on the market or the sypplying of dogs and cats; 7.  ‘online platforms’ means an online platform, as defined in Article 3, point (i), of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065, intermediating the placing on the market or of dogs or cats; Amendment 63
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 8 8.  ‘listing’ means the publication, on an online platform, of an advertisement for the supply of a dog or a cat; deleted Amendment 64
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 10 a (new) 10a.  ‘livestock guardian dog’ means a dog primarily, kept or trained to manage, move, or control livestock in agricultural or pastoral settings, including farms, grazing areas, or during transport; Amendment 65
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 11 11.  ‘establishments’ means breeding establishments, animal shelters and pet shops; 11.  ‘establishments’ means breeding establishments, selling establishments, shelters and foster homes; Amendment 66
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 12 12.  ‘breeding establishments’ means any premises or structure, where dogs and cats are kept for reproduction purposes with a view to placing their offspring on the market, including households; 12.  ‘breeding establishments’ means any premises or structure, where dogs or cats are kept for reproduction purposes with a view to placing their offspring on the market, including households; Amendment 67
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 12 a (new) 12a.  ‘agricultural holding means an agricultural holding within the meaning of Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 that is not a breeding establishment as defined in this Regulation; Amendment 68
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 13 13.  ‘pet shops’ means any premises or structure where dogs and cats are kept for sale as pet animals, without having been born there; 13.  ‘selling establishments’ means any premises or structure where dogs or cats are kept for sale without having been born there; Amendment 69
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 14 14.  ‘animal shelters’ means any premises or structure, excluding households, operated by a natural or legal person, where unwanted, abandoned, formal stray, lost or confiscated dogs and cats are kept for the purpose of supply, whether for consideration or at no cost; 14.  ‘shelters’ means any premises or structure, including households, operated by a natural or legal person, where unwanted, abandoned, formal stray, lost or confiscated dogs or cats are kept for the purpose of placing on the market; Amendment 70
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 14 a (new) 14a.  ‘foster home’ means a household that keeps dogs or cats on behalf of an operator responsible for unwanted, abandoned, stray, lost or confiscated dogs and cats; Amendment 71
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 15 15.  ‘operator’ means any natural or legal person, excluding those responsible for shelters, who breeds, keeps, trades or places on the market dogs and cats under his/her control, including for a limited period of time; 15.  ‘operator’ means any natural or legal person, that places dogs and cats on the market and that is responsible for a breeding establishment, a selling establishment or a shelter or that is responsible for dogs or cats kept therein, or that is responsible for unwanted, abandoned, stray, lost or confiscated and places them in foster homes; Amendment 72
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 16 16.  ‘supplier’ means any natural or legal person supplying a dog or a cat, including natural or legal persons responsible for shelters; deleted Amendment 73
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 18 a (new) 18a.  ‘euthanasia’ means the act of inducing death under anaesthesia and prolonged analgesia using medicinal products, using a method that causes a rapid and irreversible loss of consciousness with minimum pain and distress to an animal; Amendment 74
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 19 19.  ‘mutilation’ means an intervention, including a surgical intervention, carried out for reasons other than therapeutic or diagnostic purposes, which results in damage to or the loss of a sensitive part of the body or the alteration of bone structure; 19.  ‘mutilation’ means an intervention, including a surgical intervention, carried out for reasons other than therapeutic or diagnostic purposes, and other than neutering or implantation of a transponder, which results in damage to or the loss of a sensitive part of the body or the alteration of bone structure of a dog or a cat ; Amendment 75
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 19 a (new) 19a.  “Neutering” means the process whereby dogs or cats are surgically prevented from reproducing, including the surgical removal of gonads, namely the testicles in male cats and dogs and either the ovaries or the ovaries and the uterus in bitches and queens; Amendment 76
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 19 b (new) 19b.  “Non-surgical sterilisation” means alternatives to surgical sterilisation or neutering that preserve the integrity of the body of dog or cat and do not result in the removal or permanent alteration of any part of the dog or cat body; Amendment 77
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 20 20.  ‘suffering’ means an unpleasant, undesired physical or mental state of being, which is the result of an animal being exposed to noxious stimuli or the absence of important positive stimuli; 20.  ‘suffering’ means an unpleasant, undesired physical or mental state of being, which is the result of an animal being exposed to noxious stimuli or the continuous absence of important positive stimuli; Amendment 78
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 21 21.  ‘housing’ means buildings or delimited outdoor space in establishments where dogs and cats are kept; 21.  ‘housing’ means buildings or delimited outdoor space in establishments where dogs and cats are kept whether temporarily or permanently; Amendment 79
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 22 22.  ‘kennel’ means a physical structure containing one or more individual enclosures for housing dogs; 22.  ‘kennel’ means a physical structure containing one or more enclosures for housing dogs; Amendment 80
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 23 23.  ‘cattery’ means a physical structure containing one or more individual enclosures for housing cats; 23.  ‘cattery’ means a physical structure containing one or more enclosures for housing cats; Amendment 81
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 24 24.  ‘animal caretaker’ means a person taking care of the dogs and cats bred or kept in an establishment; 24.  ‘animal caretaker’ means a person taking care of the dogs and cats bred or kept in an establishment including volunteers, interns and part-time workers; Amendment 82
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 26 26.  ‘tethering’ means the tying of an animal to an anchor point to keep it in a desired area; 26.  ‘tethering’ means the tying of an animal to an anchor point or object to keep it in a desired area or to restrict its movement; Amendment 83
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 27 27.  ‘container’ means any crate, box, receptacle or other rigid structure used to confine dogs and cats; 27.  ‘container’ means any cage, crate, box, receptacle or movable structure used to confine dogs or cats; Amendment 84
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 28 28.  ‘pet animal’ means a dog or cat intended to be kept in a household for private enjoyment and companionship; deleted Amendment 85
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 29 29.  ‘responsible ownership’ means the commitment of a dog or cat owner or future dog or cat owner, to perform various duties focused on the satisfaction of the behavioural, environmental and physical needs of the dog or cat, and to prevent risks that the dog or cat may pose to the community, other animals or the environment. 29.  ‘responsible ownership’ means the commitment of a dog or cat owner or future dog or cat owner, to perform various duties focused on the satisfaction of the health, behavioural, environmental and physical needs of the dog or cat, and to minimize risks that the dog or cat may pose to the community, other animals or the environment. Amendment 86
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 4 – paragraph 1 – introductory part This chapter shall not apply to: With the exception of the provisions laid down in Article 5 this chapter shall not apply to: Amendment 304
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 4 – paragraph 1 – indent 1 –  breeding establishments keeping up to three bitches or queens and producing in total two litters or less per establishment and calendar year; –  breeding establishment where at most two litters per calendar year are produced for placing on the market shall only be subject to the obligations laid down in Article 5, Article 6(1), (1a) and (1b), Articles 6a, 7 and 8, Article 11(2), (3) and (4), Article 12(3), (4) and (7), Article 13(2), points (b), (c) and (d), Article 14(2), (3), (4) and (5a), Article 15 and Article 15a(1). Amendment 88
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 4 – paragraph 1 – indent 2 –  pet shops keeping at any given time three dogs or less or six cats or less; deleted Amendment 89
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 4 – paragraph 1 – indent 3 a (new) –  foster homes keeping at any given time five dogs or less or ten cats or less. Amendment 90
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 5 – title General principles of welfare General welfare principles Amendment 91
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part Operators and natural or legal persons responsible for shelters shall apply the following principles with respect to dogs and cats bred or kept in their establishment: Operators and animal caretakers shall apply the following welfare principles with respect to dogs or cats bred or kept in their establishment: Amendment 92
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a (a)  dogs and cats are provided with water and feed of a quality and of a quantity that enables them to have good nutrition and hydration. (a)  dogs and cats are provided with water and feed of a quality and of a quantity that enables them to have good and appropriate nutrition and hydration. Amendment 93
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b (b)  dogs and cats are kept in a good physical environment which is comfortable, especially in terms of space, temperature, and ease of movement. (b)  dogs and cats are kept in an appropriate and clean physical environment which is secure and comfortable, especially in terms of space, air quality, temperature, light, protection against adverse climatic conditions and ease of movement, preventing overcrowding. Amendment 94
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c (c)  dogs and cats are kept safe, clean and in good health by preventing diseases, functional impairments, injuries, and pain, due in particular to management, handling practices, or mutilations. (c)  dogs and cats are kept safe, clean and in good health by preventing diseases, functional impairments, injuries, and pain, due in particular to management, handling practices, breeding practices or mutilations. Amendment 95
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e (e)  dogs and cats are kept in such a way as to optimise their mental state by preventing or reducing their negative experiences in time and intensity, as well as by maximizing opportunities for positive experiences in time and intensity in the different domains referred to in paragraphs (a) to (d). (e)  dogs and cats are kept in such a way as to optimise their mental state by preventing or reducing their negative experiences in duration and intensity, as well as by maximizing opportunities for positive experiences in duration and intensity, preventing the development of abnormal repetitive and other behaviours indicative of negative animal welfare, and taking into consideration the individual dog’s or cat’s needs in the different domains referred to in paragraphs (a) to (d). Amendment 96
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 6 – title General welfare requirements for dogs and cats General welfare obligations Amendment 97
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 6 – paragraph 1 1.  Operators and natural or legal persons responsible for shelters shall be responsible for the welfare of dogs and cats kept under their control and for minimising any risks to their welfare. 1.  Operators and animal caretakers shall be responsible for the welfare of dogs or cats kept in their establishments and under their control and to minimise any risks to their welfare. In the case of foster homes, the responsibility shall lie with the operator on whose behalf dogs or cats are kept. Such operators shall provide the foster family with adequate information on the animal welfare requirements and obligations as well as the individual needs of the dogs or cats, and shall ensure and verify that the relevant obligations set out by this Regulation are complied with in foster homes. Amendment 98
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 6 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a.  Operators shall not subject any dog or cat to cruelty, abuse or mistreatment, nor shall they breed, train or medicate them to participate in activities resulting in cruelty, abuse or mistreatment to themselves or to other dogs and cats, including dog fighting. Amendment 99
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 6 – paragraph 1 b (new) 1b.  Operators and animal caretakers shall not abandon dogs or cats. Amendment 101
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 6 – paragraph 3 3.  Operators of breeding establishments shall ensure that breeding strategies do not result in genotypes and phenotypes that have detrimental effects on the welfare of the dogs and cats, or of their descendants. deleted In the management of the reproduction of dogs and cats by operators, the mating between parents and offspring, or between grandparents and grandchildren, shall be prohibited. This paragraph shall not preclude the selection and breeding of brachycephalic dogs and cats provided that the selection or breeding programmes minimise the negative welfare consequences of brachycephalic traits. Amendment 102
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 6 – paragraph 4 4.  The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 23 amending this article as regards the specific criteria that operators shall fulfil when designing breeding strategies to meet the requirements of paragraph 3, taking into account scientific opinions of the European Food Safety Authority as well as social, economic and environmental impacts. deleted Amendment 103
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 6 a (new) Article 6a Breeding strategies obligations 1.  Operators of breeding establishments shall ensure that their breeding strategies prioritise the health and welfare of the animal, and minimise the risk of producing dogs or cats with genotypes or phenotypes associated with detrimental effects on their welfare 2.  Operators of breeding establishments shall not use for reproduction dogs or cats that have excessive conformational traits leading to a high risk of detrimental effects on the welfare of these dogs or cats, or of their offspring. 3.  The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 23 supplementing this Regulation by laying down the characteristics of the genotypes and phenotypes referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article, and the excessive conformational traits referred to in paragraph 2 of this Article, which shall be excluded from reproduction, taking into account scientific opinions of the European Food Safety Authority as well as social and economic impacts. The delegated acts concerning the excessive conformational traits shall be adopted by 1 July 2030. 4.  Unless approved by the competent authority based on a specific need to preserve local breeds with a limited genetic pool, the breeding between parents and offspring, between siblings, between halfsiblings or between grandparents and grandchildren shall be prohibited in the management of the reproduction of dogs and cats. Amendment 104
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 7 – title Obligation to notify the breeding or keeping of dogs and cats in establishments Notification and registration of establishments Amendment 105
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 7 – paragraph 1 – introductory part Operators and natural or legal persons responsible for shelters shall notify to the competent authorities of their activity, providing the following information: Operators shall notify to the competent authorities of their activity, providing at least the following information: Amendment 106
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point c (c)  the type of establishment: breeding establishment, pet shop or shelter; (c)  the type of establishment: breeding establishment, selling establishment shelter or foster home; Amendment 107
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point e (e)  the maximum number of animals which can be kept in the establishment; (e)  the capacity of the establishment expressed as the maximum number of dogs and cats which can be kept in the establishment. Amendment 108
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new) Operators shall notify the competent authority of: (a)  any changes concerning the information referred to in paragraph 1; (b)  any cessation of activity and also specifying a deadline by which the activity must be closed, which should be no later than one month after the cessation, and also providing information on the fate of the animals; Without prejudice to any additional information required under this Article, operators are not required to notify again the information already submitted in accordance with point (b) of Article 84(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/429. The competent authority shall maintain a register of establishments and may use for this purpose the register provided for in point (a) of Article 101(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/429. Amendment 109
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 7 a (new) Article 7a Approval of breeding establishments 1.  Operators of breeding establishments shall only place dogs or cats on the market after approval of their establishment by the competent authority. 2.  The competent authority shall perform on-site inspections to verify that the establishment meets the requirements of this Regulation. Member States may allow such inspections to be carried out remotely provided that the means of distance communication used provide sufficient evidence for the competent authority to perform reliable inspections. The competent authority shall only grant a certificate of approval to a breeding establishment that meets the requirements of this Regulation. 3.  The competent authorities shall maintain a list of the approved breeding establishments and make it publicly available. Amendment 110
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 8 – paragraph 1 1.  When operators and natural or legal persons responsible for shelters place on the market or supply dogs or cats for purposes of keeping them as pet animals, they shall provide to the acquirer of pet the information necessary to enable him or her to ensure the welfare of the animal, including information on responsible ownership. 1.  Operators shall provide to the acquirer of a dog or cat written information necessary to enable him or her to ensure the welfare of the dog or cat including information on responsible ownership and on the specific needs of the dog or cat in terms of feeding, caring, health, housing and behavioural needs, as well as information on its health, including vaccination status. Amendment 111
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 2.  When the supplying of dogs and cats is advertised via online means, the listing shall display, in clearly visible and bold characters, the following warning: 2.  When operators and the natural or legal persons advertise the placing on the market of dogs and cats, via online platforms at least the following warning shall be displayed, in clearly visible and bold characters: Amendment 288
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 8 – paragraph 2 2.  When the supplying of dogs and cats is advertised via online means, the listing shall display, in clearly visible and bold characters, the following warning: 2.  When the supplying of dogs and cats is advertised via online means, the listing shall display, in clearly visible and bold characters, the following warning: “An animal is not a toy. Buying or adopting an animal is a life-changing decision. As an animal owner, you are obliged to ensure that all the needs for its health and well-being are met at all times.” “An animal is not a toy. Buying or adopting an animal is a life-changing decision. As an animal owner, you are obliged to ensure its health and well-being needs are met at all times. Taking care of an animal requires financial resources. It is forbidden to abandon the animal once it is in your care.” Amendment 113
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 9 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1.  Animal caretakers shall have the following competences as regards the dogs and cats they are handling: 1.  Animal caretakers, with the exception of supervised volunteers and interns, shall have the following competences as regards the dogs and cats they are handling: Amendment 114
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point b (b)  ability to recognise their expressions including any sign of suffering and to identify the appropriate mitigating measures to be taken in such cases; (b)  ability to recognise their expressions including any sign of suffering and to identify and take the appropriate mitigating measures to be taken in such cases; Amendment 115
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point c (c)  ability to apply good animal management practices, to use and maintain the equipment used for the species under their care and to minimize any risks to the welfare of the animals; (c)  ability to apply good animal management practices, to use and maintain the equipment used for the species under their care and to minimize any risks to the welfare of the animals, preventing suffering; Amendment 116
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 10 – title Animal welfare visits Advisory welfare visits Amendment 117
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 10 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1.  Operators and natural or legal persons responsible for shelters shall: 1.  Operators shall: Amendment 277
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point a (a)  ensure that the establishments under their responsibility receive, at least once a year, a visit by a veterinarian, for the purpose of advising the operator or the natural or legal person responsible for the shelter on measures to address any risk factor for animal welfare; (a)  ensure that by … [1 year after the date of application of this Regulation] or within the first year from the date of the notification of a new establishment, the establishments under their responsibility receive, at least once a year, an unannounced visit by an official veterinarian, hired by the competent authority, for the purpose of identifying and assessing any risk factor for animal welfare, advising the operator or the natural or legal person responsible for the shelter on measures to address risks for animal welfare, health and the environment and, if the findings indicate severe risk factors, a report to the competent authority in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2017/625 and a follow-up visit within two months; Amendment 119
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point b (b)  record the findings of the visit of the veterinarian referred to in point (a) and their follow up actions and keep those records for at least 6 years, making them available to the competent authorities upon request. (b)  keep the records of the findings of the visit of the veterinarian referred to in point (a) and of their follow up actions and keep those records for at least 5 years, from the day of the visit, and shall make them available to the competent authorities and visiting veterinarian upon request. Amendment 120
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 10 – paragraph 2 2.  The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 23 supplementing this Article to lay down minimum criteria to be assessed during animal welfare visits. 2.  By [24 months from the date of entry into force of this Regulation] the Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 23 supplementing this Article to lay down minimum criteria to identify and assess the risk factors by the veterinarian during the advisory welfare visits, including on follow-up actions. Amendment 121
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 11 – paragraph 1 1.  Operators and natural or legal persons responsible for shelters shall ensure that dogs and cats are fed in accordance with the requirements laid down in point 1 of Annex I and may, based on the written advice of a veterinarian or an animal nutrition expert, adjust the feeding frequencies provided for in point 1 of Annex I. 1.  Operators shall ensure that dogs or cats are fed in accordance with the requirements laid down in point 1 of Annex I. Amendment 122
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 11 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2.  Operators and natural or legal persons responsible for shelters shall ensure that dogs and cats are adequately fed and hydrated by supplying: 2.  Operators shall ensure that dogs or cats are adequately fed and hydrated by supplying: Amendment 123
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point a (a)  potable water, ad libitum; (a)  clean and fresh water, ad libitum; Amendment 124
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point b (b)  feed in sufficient quantity and quality to meet the physiological, nutritional and metabolic needs and satiety of the dogs and cats, as part of a diet adapted to the age, breed, category, activity level, and health status of the dogs and cats; (b)  feed in sufficient quantity and quality to meet the physiological, nutritional and metabolic needs and satiety of the dogs and cats, as part of a diet adapted to the age, breed, category, activity level, and health status of the dogs and cats or cats, with the overall objective of achieving and maintaining good health; Amendment 125
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 11 – paragraph 3 – introductory part 3.  Operators and natural or legal persons responsible for shelters shall ensure that feeding and drinking facilities are constructed and installed in such a way as to: 3.  Operators and caretakers shall ensure that feeding and drinking facilities are kept clean and constructed and installed in such a way as to: Amendment 126
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 11 – paragraph 3 – point a (a)  provide equal access to all dogs and cats, thus minimizing competition between them, avoiding agonistic behaviour, in particular where dogs and cats do not have ad libitum access to feed; (a)  provide equal access to all dogs and cats; Amendment 127
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 11 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a.  Where advised in writing by a veterinarian to do so, the operators may adjust the feeding and watering frequencies. The operators shall keep a record of the advice for its entire duration as advised by the veterinarian. Amendment 128
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 12 – paragraph 1 1.  Operators shall ensure that dogs and cats are provided with housing in accordance with point 2 of Annex I. 1.  Except of natural or legal person responsible for shelters, operators shall ensure that dogs and cats are provided with housing in accordance with point 2 of Annex I. Amendment 129
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 12 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2.  Operators and natural or legal persons responsible for shelters shall ensure that: 2.  Operators shall ensure that: Amendment 130
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point c (c)  where animals are kept in breeding establishments or pet shops, air circulation, dust levels, temperature, relative air humidity and gas concentrations are kept within limits which are not harmful to dogs and cats and that ventilation is sufficient to avoid overheating and, where necessary, in combination with heating systems, to remove excessive moisture; (c)  in breeding establishments and selling establishments where dogs and cats are kept indoors, temperature, relative air humidity and gas concentrations are not harmful to dogs or cats and that ventilation is sufficient to avoid overheating; Amendment 131
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point d (d)  dogs and cats have enough space to be able to move around freely and to express species-specific behaviour according to their needs, with sufficient space for enrichment material and structures, a possibility for animals to socialise and withdraw, and clean resting places; (d)  dogs and cats have enough space to be able to move around freely and to express species-specific behaviour according to their needs; Amendment 132
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 12 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 Keeping dogs or cats in containers shall be prohibited. Operators shall not keep dogs or cats in containers. Amendment 289
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 12 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 a (new) Keeping or selling dogs or cats in pet shops shall be prohibited. Amendment 133
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 12 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 Containers may only be used for the transport and temporary isolation of individual dogs and cats provided that stress due to extreme temperatures is avoided. By way of derogation, containers may only be used for the transport, short term isolation of individual dogs or cats and during the participation in shows, exhibitions and competitions, for puppies or kittens with reduced thermoregulation capacity or puppies or kittens together with their mothers, provided that stress is minimised and suffering is avoided and the dogs and cats are able to stand and lie down in a natural position. Amendment 134
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 12 – paragraph 4 4.  Keeping dogs exclusively indoors shall be prohibited. Dogs kept indoors shall have daily access to an outdoor area that allows exercise and socialisation. In addition, when dogs are kept in kennels, operators shall design and construct individual enclosures to allow dogs to have free access to a confined outdoor space and an indoor space or an individual hut. 4.  Keeping dogs exclusively indoors shall be prohibited. Dogs kept indoors shall have daily access to an outdoor area that allows exercise, exploration and socialisation. In addition, when dogs are kept in kennels, operators shall design and construct individual enclosures to allow dogs to have free access to a confined outdoor space and an indoor space or an individual hut. Amendment 135
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 12 – paragraph 6 a (new) 6a.  Operators of breeding and selling establishments shall use, where necessary, heating or cooling systems to maintain good air quality, an appropriate temperature in indoor enclosures at their establishments, and remove excessive moisture. Amendment 136
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 12 – paragraph 7 7.  Operators shall ensure that dogs and cats have access to natural light at all times. Where needed, due to the climatic conditions and geographic position of a Member State, operators shall provide artificial lighting. 7.  Operators shall ensure that dogs or cats are exposed to light, and are able to stay in the dark for sufficient and uninterrupted periods in order to maintain a normal circadian rhythm. For the purposes of the first subparagraph, ‘light’ means natural light, complemented, where needed, due to the climatic conditions and geographic position of a Member State, by artificial light. Amendment 137
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 12 – paragraph 8 8.  This Article applies from [5 years from the date of entry into force of this Regulation]. deleted Amendment 138
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 12 – paragraph 8 a (new) 8a.  Paragraph 4 shall not apply to breeding establishments where livestock guardian dogs are kept during the periods when such dogs are being trained for herding purposes. Amendment 139
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 13 – paragraph 1 1.  Operators shall ensure that measures are taken to safeguard the health of dogs and cats in accordance with point 3 of Annex 1. deleted Amendment 140
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 13 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2.  Operators and natural or legal persons responsible for shelters shall ensure that: 2.  Operators and caretakers shall ensure that: Amendment 141
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 13 – paragraph 2 – point a (a)  dogs and cats under their responsibility are inspected by animal caretakers at least once a day; (a)  dogs or cats under their responsibility are inspected by animal caretakers at least once a day and vulnerable dogs and cats, such as newborns, ill or injured dogs and cats, and peri-partum bitches and queens, are inspected more frequently; Amendment 142
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 13 – paragraph 2 – point b (b)  dogs or cats with signs of disease, sickness, injury or otherwise compromised welfare are transferred, where required, without undue delay to a separate area, are treated by a veterinarian, where appropriate, and kept there until they are fully recovered, or alternatively euthanised without undue delay; (b)  dogs or cats with signs of disease, sickness, injury or otherwise compromised welfare are transferred, where required, without undue delay to a separate area, are treated by a veterinarian, where appropriate, and kept there until they are fully recovered; Amendment 143
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 13 – paragraph 2 – point c (c)  the euthanasia of a dog or a cat is only performed by a veterinarian. (c)  where, in cases referred to in point (b), recovery is not achievable and the dogs or cats experience severe pain or suffering that cannot be alleviated and keeping them alive is contrary to the rules of their well-being euthanasia may be only carried out by a veterinarian and with the prior consent of the operator Amendment 144
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 13 – paragraph 2 – point d (d)  measures including veterinary medication are in place to prevent and control external and internal parasites, including preventive veterinary treatments to prevent common diseases to which dogs or cats are likely to be exposed with due regard to the epidemiological situation; (d)  measures are in place to prevent and control external and internal parasites, including preventive veterinary treatments such as vaccination, to prevent common diseases to which dogs or cats are likely to be exposed with due regard to the epidemiological situation; Amendment 145
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 13 – paragraph 2 – point e (e)  enrichment materials do not present any risk of injury or biological or chemical contamination or any other health risk. (e)  enrichment materials do not present any risk of biological or chemical contamination. Amendment 146
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 13 – paragraph 2 – point e a (new) (ea)  if available, relevant health related information shall be provided to the acquirer of a dog or a cat, including information on vaccination, allergies, health conditions and on responsible ownership in accordance with Article 8(1). Point (a) shall not apply to breeding establishments where livestock guardian dogs are kept during the periods when such dogs are used for herding or training purposes. Amendment 147
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 13 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a.   The euthanasia of a dog or a cat in animal shelters as a population management solution is prohibited. Amendment 148
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 13 – paragraph 2 – point e b (new) (eb)   health care for animals is aligned with a ‘One Health’ approach, such as the prudent use of antibiotics to avoid anti-microbial resistance (AMR). Amendment 149
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 13 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part Operators shall ensure that: Operators responsible for breeding establishments and their caretakers shall ensure that: Amendment 150
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 13 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point -a (new) (-a)  measures are taken to safeguard the health of dogs or cats in accordance with point 3 of Annex I; Amendment 151
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 13 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point a (a)  bitches and queens are only bred if they have a minimum age in accordance with Annex I points 3.1 and 3.2, their skeletal growth is completed, and they are free from disease or physical conditions which could negatively impact their pregnancy and welfare; (a)  bitches or queens are only bred if they have a minimum age in accordance with point 3 of Annex I, their skeletal growth is completed, and they have no diagnosed disease, clinical sign of diseases or physical conditions which could negatively impact their pregnancy and welfare; Amendment 152
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 13 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b (b)  litter-giving pregnancies of bitches and queens follows a maximum frequency; (b)  litter-giving pregnancies of bitches or queens follows a maximum frequency in accordance with point 3 of Annex I; ; Amendment 153
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 13 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point d (d)  any bitch aged 8 years or more and any queen aged 6 years or more shall, before being used for breeding, undergo a physical examination by a veterinarian, to confirm in writing that her pregnancy will not pose any risk to her welfare, including her health. deleted Amendment 154
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 13 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point e (e)  adult female dogs and cats which are no longer used for reproduction, including as a result of the provisions of this Regulation, are not killed or abandoned. Operators shall continue to ensure the welfare of those animals in accordance with Regulation. (e)  dogs and cats which are no longer used for reproduction, including as a result of the provisions of this Regulation, are either kept or sold, donated or rehomed, not killed or abandoned. Amendment 155
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 13 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 The operator shall keep the written confirmation referred to in point (d) for a period of at least 3 years after the death of the bitch or the queen. deleted Amendment 156
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 13 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 a (new) When operators and natural or legal persons responsible for shelters possess results of health tests of a dog or a cat or genetic reports and diagnoses of sire or dam of the pet animal in question, they shall share this information with the animal´s acquirer. Amendment 157
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 13 – paragraph 4 4.  This Article shall apply from [5 years from the date of entry into force of this Regulation]. deleted Amendment 158
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 14 – paragraph 1 1.  Operators and natural or legal persons responsible for shelters shall ensure that measures are taken to meet the behavioural needs of cats and dogs in accordance with point 4 of Annex I. 1.  Operators shall ensure that measures are taken to meet the behavioural needs of cats or dogs in accordance with point 4 of Annex I. Amendment 159
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 14 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2.  Keeping dogs and cats in areas restraining their natural movements shall be prohibited, except for performing the following procedures or treatments: 2.  Keeping dogs and cats in areas restraining their natural movements shall be prohibited, except in case of Article 12(3), second subparagraph, and for performing the following procedures or treatments: Amendment 160
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 14 – paragraph 2 – point a (a)  physical examinations, including identification of the animals; (a)  physical examinations; Amendment 161
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 14 – paragraph 2 – point b (b)  marking animals for identification purposes; (b)  individual identification of dogs and cats and reading the identification information; Amendment 164
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 14 – paragraph 3 3.  Tethering within the premises of the establishment for more than 1 hour shall be prohibited, except for the duration of a medical treatment. 3.  Tethering shall be prohibited, except for the duration of a medical treatment. Amendment 165
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 14 – paragraph 5 a (new) 5a.  Operators shall ensure that enrichment is provided and accessible to all dogs or cats, creating a stimulating environment, enabling species-specific behaviour and reducing their frustration. Amendment 166
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 14 – paragraph 5 b (new) 5b.  Member States may grant derogations from paragraph 3 for dogs intended for use in military, police and customs services that are kept in breeding or selling establishments. Amendment 167
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 15 – paragraph 1 1.  Mutilations, including ear cropping, tail docking, partial or complete digit amputation, and resection of vocal cords or folds, shall be prohibited unless they are performed due to a medical indication with the sole purpose of improving the health of dogs and cats. In such case, the procedure shall only be performed by a veterinarian under anaesthesia and prolonged analgesia. 1.  Mutilations, including ear cropping, tail docking, claw removal or other partial or complete digit amputation, and resection of vocal cords or folds, shall be prohibited unless they are performed upon medical indication, which may include prophylactic, diagnostic, and/or treatment reasons, with the sole purpose of , preserving, improving the health of dogs or cats or preventing injury. In such case, the procedure shall only be performed by a veterinarian under anaesthesia and prolonged analgesia. Amendment 168
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 15 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a.  The medical indication for the mutilation and details of procedure to be carried out, shall be documented by a veterinarian. This document shall be retained by the operator until the dog or cat, along with this document, are transferred to another establishment or owner. The operator of the establishment responsible for the dog or cat when the mutilation was performed by the veterinarian shall retain a copy of the document for three years. By way of derogation, Member States may allow ear cropping by notching or tipping cat ears in the context of marking stray cats when neutered under trap-neuter programmes. Amendment 169
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 15 – paragraph 2 2.  Male and female neutering shall be permitted only if performed by a veterinarian under anaesthesia and prolonged analgesia. 2.  Operators shall ensure that neutering is only performed under anesthesia and prolongued analgesia by a veterinarian. Veterinarians may consider non-surgical sterilisation to neutering, whenever appropriate. Amendment 170
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 15 – paragraph 3 – introductory part 3.  The following handling practices shall be prohibited: 3.  The following handling practices that cause pain or suffering shall be prohibited: Amendment 171
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 15 – paragraph 3 – point d (d)  prolonged use of muzzles, unless required for health or welfare reasons, in which case the duration shall be limited to the minimum period necessary. (d)  prolonged using of muzzles, unless required for health or welfare reasons, in which case the duration shall be limited to the minimum period necessary. Amendment 172
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 15 – paragraph 3 – point e (e)  lifting dogs or cats by the limbs, the head, the tail and the hair. (e)  lifting dogs or cats by the limbs, the head, the tail, ears, skin or the hair. Amendment 173
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 15 – paragraph 3 – point e a (new) (ea)  using prong collars; Amendment 174
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 15 – paragraph 3 – point e b (new) (eb)  using choke collars without safety top; Amendment 175
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 15 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a.  Member States may grant derogations from paragraph 3 for dogs intended for use in military, police or customs services. Amendment 176
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 15 a (new) Article 15a Aesthetic shows, exhibitions and competitions 1.  Operators of breeding or selling establishments shall not use in aesthetic shows, exhibitions and competitions of dogs and cats, dogs or cats with excessive conformational traits or dogs or cats which have been mutilated in such a way that results in an alteration of physical characteristics. 2.  Organisers of aesthetic shows, exhibitions and competitions of dogs and cats shall exclude from such shows, exhibitions and competitions dogs and cats which have excessive conformational traits or dogs or cats which have been mutilated in such a way that results in an alteration of physical characteristics. Amendment 177
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 17 – paragraph 1 1.  From [3 years from the date of entry into force], all dogs and cats kept in establishments for supply in the Union, including adult dogs and cats kept in breeding establishments, dogs and cats kept in shelters, and dogs and cats supplied by natural persons, shall be marked for identification by means of a subcutaneous transponder containing a microchip, in accordance with Annex II. Operators of establishments shall ensure that dogs and cats born in their establishments are marked for identification by the date of their supply in the Union or at the latest within 3 months after the birth of the animal. The implantation of the transponder shall be performed by a veterinarian or under the responsibility of a veterinarian. 1.  All dogs and cats kept in establishments and all dogs and cats placed on the market shall be individually identified by means of a subcutaneous transponder containing a microchip, in accordance with Annex II. The implantation of the transponder shall be performed by a veterinarian or under the responsibility of a veterinarian. Where a veterinarian considers that the implantation of a microchip could significantly compromise the dog’s or cat’s health, he/she may delay the microchip implantation temporarily until the animal’s health concerns can be suitably addressed. In case a dog or a cat is experiencing significant adverse reactions after the implantation of the microchip, the veterinary shall take all the necessary actions to ensure the dog’s or cat’s health, including removal of the microchip. Amendment 178
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 17 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a.  Operators of establishments shall ensure that dogs and cats born in their establishments are individually identified within 3 months after their birth and in any event before the date of their placing on the market. Amendment 179
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 17 – paragraph 1 b (new) 1b.  Operators of selling establishments, shelters, and those responsible for unwanted, abandoned, stray, lost or confiscated dogs and cats that enter their establishments or come under their responsibility shall ensure that dogs and cats are individually identified within 30 days after their arrival at the establishment and in any event before the date of their placing on the market. Amendment 180
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 17 – paragraph 1 c (new) 1c.  Natural or legal persons, other than operators, placing dogs or cats on the market shall ensure that they are individually identified before the date of their placing on the market. Amendment 181
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 17 – paragraph 1 d (new) 1d.  Dogs and cats which have been individually identified by means of an injectable transponder containing a microchip, in accordance with Union or national law before [the date of application of this Regulation], shall be considered compliant with the requirements in this paragraph, provided that the microchip is readable. Amendment 313
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 17 – paragraph 1 e (new) 1e.   From … [5 years from the date of entry into force of this Regulation], all dogs kept shall be individually identified in accordance with paragraph 1. From … [10 years from the date of entry into force of this Regulation], all cats kept shall be individually identified in accordance with paragraph 1. Amendment 182
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 17 – paragraph 2 2.  From [3 years from the date of entry into force], dogs and cats identified in accordance with paragraph 1 shall be registered by the veterinarian, or an assistant under the responsibility of the veterinarian, in a national database referred to in Article 19. For dogs and cats kept in breeding establishments, the registration shall be made in the name of the owner of the breeding establishment responsible for the dog or the cat. For dogs and cats kept in shelters , the registration shall be made in the name of the person responsible of the shelter. For natural persons intending to supply a dog or a cat in the Union, the registration shall be made in the name of that person. Any subsequent owner of, or responsible for, the dog or the cat, shall ensure that the change of ownership or responsibility is recorded in the database referred to in Article 19. 2.  Within two working days after their identification, in accordance with paragraph 1, the dogs and cats shall be registered by the veterinarian, in a national database referred to in Article 19. Member States may allow the registration by other persons than veterinarians, provided that they have measures in place to ensure the accuracy of information inserted in the database. For dogs and cats kept in establishments, the registration shall be made in the name of the operator of the establishment responsible for the dog or the cat. For natural persons placing a dog or a cat on the market, the registration shall be made in the name of that person. In case of transfer of ownership or responsibility, the natural or legal person placing, the dog or the cat on the market, shall ensure that any change of ownership or responsibility is recorded in the database referred to in Article 19, within two weeks from the date of change of ownership or responsibility, in accordance with the conditions laid down by the Member State responsible. Amendment 183
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 17 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a.  In the case of a death of a dog or a cat kept in an establishment, the operator shall ensure that the death is recorded in the database referred to in Article 19, in accordance with the conditions laid down by the Member State responsible for that database. Amendment 184
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 17 – paragraph 2 b (new) 2b.  Member States may grant derogations from paragraph 2 and 2a for military, police and customs dogs that are kept in establishments. Amendment 185
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 17 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part From [3 years from the date of entry into force], before supplying a dog or a cat in the Union, the supplier shall provide to the acquirer of the animal: Before placing a dog or a cat on the market the operators or natural or legal persons placing the dog or cat on the market shall provide to the acquirer of the animal: Amendment 186
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 17 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point a (a)  proof of the identification and registration of the animal in compliance with paragraphs 1 and 2; (a)  proof of the identification and registration of dog or cat in compliance with paragraphs 1 and 2 and a weblink to the system referred to in paragraph 6; Amendment 187
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 17 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 Acquirers shall be able to verify the authenticity of the identification and registration of animals supplied through the system referred to in paragraph 7. Acquirers shall be able to verify the authenticity of the identification and registration of dogs or cats placed on the market through the system referred to in paragraph 7. Amendment 188
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 17 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 From [5 years from the date of entry into force], providers of online platforms shall ensure that their online interface is designed and organised in such a way that allows the suppliers of dogs and cats to comply with their obligations under paragraph 3, in line with Article 31 of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065, and shall inform acquirers, in a visible manner, of the possibility to verify the identification and registration of the animal through a weblink to the system referred to in paragraph 6. Providers of online platforms shall ensure that their online interface is designed and organised in such a way that facilitates the operators or other natural or legal persons placing dogs or cats on the market to comply with their obligations under paragraph 3, and Article 8 paragraph 2 in line with Article 31 of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065, and shall inform acquirers, in a visible manner, of the possibility to verify the identification and registration of the dog or cat through a weblink to the system referred to in paragraph 6. Amendment 189
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 17 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 The supplier of dogs and cats shall be the sole responsible for the accuracy of the information provided through the interface of the online platform. Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed as imposing a general monitoring obligation on the provider of the online platform within the meaning of Article 8 of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065. The natural or legal person placing dogs or cats on the market shall be the solely responsible for the accuracy of the information provided through the interface of the online platform. Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed as imposing a general monitoring obligation on the provider of the online platform within the meaning of Article 8 of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065. Amendment 190
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 17 – paragraph 5 5.  The Commission shall adopt implementing acts specifying the information to be provided by suppliers as proof of identification and registration of the animal in accordance with paragraph 3(a), both in cases where the dogs and cats are offered through online platforms and by other means. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 24. deleted Amendment 191
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 17 – paragraph 6 – introductory part 6.  From [3 years from the date of entry into force], the Commission shall ensure that a system performing automated checks of the authenticity of the identification and registration of dogs or cats supplied, using the database referred to in Article 19, is publicly available free of charge . The Commission may entrust the development, maintenance and operation of this system to an independent entity. The system shall meet the following criteria: 6.  The Commission shall ensure that an online system performing automated checks of the authenticity of the identification and registration of dogs or cats placed on the market, using the database referred to in Article 19, is publicly available free of charge . The Commission may entrust the development, maintenance and operation of this system to an independent entity following a public selection process, pursuant to the relevant provisions of Title VII of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046. The system shall meet the following criteria: Amendment 192
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 17 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part By the [3 years from the date of entry into force], the Commission shall adopt implementing acts specifying the following aspects of the system referred to in paragraph 6: The Commission shall adopt implementing acts laying down: Amendment 193
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 17 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – point a (new) (a)  based on the content of the databases referred to in Article 19(3), point a, the exact information to be provided by natural and legal persons placing dogs or cats on the market, as proof of identification and registration of the dogs and cats in accordance with point (a) of paragraph 3, both in cases where the dogs and cats are offered through online platforms and by other means; Amendment 194
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 17 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – point a – indent 2 a (new) –   the categories of personal data that are made available to the verifying person during the verification of the identification and registration, that shall be limited to those strictly needed to enable such verification. Amendment 195
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 17 – paragraph 7 – – subparagraph 1 – point b (new) (b)  the following aspects of the system referred to in paragraph 6: —  the key functionalities of the system; Amendment 196
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 17 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 a(new) The implementing acts referred to in point (a) shall be adopted by [the date of application of this Regulation] and the implementing act referred to in point (b) shall be adopted by [3 years from date of entry into force of this Regulation] Amendment 197
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new) (aa)   ensuring that veterinarians and other relevant professionals receive training on best practices in animal welfare, including on the detection and reporting of welfare violations including painful practices as set out in Article 15, in line with One Health principles. Amendment 198
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point a b (new) (ab)   ensuring that operators, natural or legal persons responsible for shelters, foster homes and pounds, animal caretakers and veterinarians receive adequate and regular training and certificates for the completion of the training courses referred to in point (a); Amendment 199
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point a c (new) (ac)  ensuring that shelter medicine courses, including those with a focus on herd health, are available for veterinarians; Amendment 200
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point a d (new) (ad)   ensuring that trainers and handlers of dogs intended for military, police and customs services receive regular training within and preferably across Member States in order to improve their skills especially on operant conditioning and positive reinforcement, on behavioural science and welfare principles, and on stress management for both dogs and handlers; Amendment 201
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new) (ba)   facilitating collaboration between competent authorities, veterinary associations, and educational institutions to develop and promote high-quality, long term science-based training programmes for animal caretakers and veterinary professionals, increasing the cooperation between relevant agencies and the synergies between the information campaigns. Amendment 202
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 18 a (new) Article 18a National information campaigns on the protection of stray animals and legislation concerning the protection of stray animals 1.  Member States are encouraged to initiate and implement national information campaigns on current legislation concerning the protection and welfare of dogs and cats. These campaigns must be aimed both at animal owners and at the general public, in order to raise awareness about the legal obligations and best practices in caring for animals. 2.  Information campaigns may be conducted by the competent authorities in collaboration with animal protection organisations, veterinarians and other relevant entities. The information communicated shall include: (a)  the legal obligations of keepers of pet animals; (b)  the responsibilities and actions of local authorities in managing strays, as well as the actions that they are to take to prevent abandonment; (c)  the steps to be taken if a person finds a lost or abandoned animal, including contacting veterinary services, animal shelters or the local police; (d)  a statement of the importance of responsible adoption and neutering to reduce the stray animal population. 3.  Member States may provide national or regional funding for these campaigns and may encourage the participation of mass media and educational establishments with a view to disseminating the information further. 4.  The Commission shall encourage the exchange of best practices between Member States. Amendment 203
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 18 b (new) Article 18b Measures to prevent abandonment and promote the neutering of dogs and cats 1.  Member States shall be encouraged to adopt concrete measures to prevent the abandonment of dogs and cats, including through public education, by raising awareness about responsible ownership and through the effective enforcement of existing legislation. 2.  To reduce the number of strays, Member States shall be encouraged to identify and use national and private sources of funding for: (a)  free or subsidised neutering campaigns for stray dogs and cats and for pet animals belonging to low-income people or animal protection organisations; (b)  programmes for the registration and identification of pet animals, including by means of microchipping, to facilitate adoption and the return of lost animals to their owners and prevent abandonment; (c)  actions to raise awareness among and educate the population about the responsibility of keeping a pet animal and the negative effects of abandonment on animal welfare and on communities. 3.  Member States may work with non-governmental organisations, veterinary clinics and local authorities to implement the measures referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 and for the purpose of facilitating access to neutering and identification programmes. Amendment 204
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 19 – paragraph 1 1.  From [3 years from the date of entry into force of this Regulation], competent authorities shall establish and maintain a database for the registration of microchipped dogs and cats. 1.  The competent authorities shall establish and maintain databases for dogs and cats identified and registered in accordance with Article 17 and Article 21(4) Amendment 205
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 19 – paragraph 2 2.  From [5 years from date of entry into force of this Regulation], Member States shall ensure that their databases as referred to in paragraph 1 are interoperable with the same databases of other Member States so that the identification of a dog or a cat can be authenticated and traced across the Union. 2.  Member States shall ensure that their databases as referred to in paragraph 1 comply with the requirements laid down by the implementing act referred to in point (b) of paragraph 3 to ensure their interoperability so that the identification of a dog or a cat can be authenticated and traced across the Union. Amendment 206
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 19 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a.  The Commission shall establish and maintain an index database containing the identification numbers of the microchips of the dogs and cats and the national databases where the identification details are stored, without accessing personal data. The Commission may entrust the development, maintenance and operation of this index database to an independent entity, following a public selection process, pursuant to the relevant provisions of [ Title VII of the Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509. Amendment 316
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 19 – paragraph 2 b (new) 2b.   The Commission and the competent authorities of Member States shall co-operate to establish and maintain a publicly accessible database of animal shelter establishments across the Union, ensuring transparency and accountability in the adherence to animal welfare law. Amendment 207
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 19 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b (b)  their interoperability between Member States; (b)  the interoperability between Member States databases and the index database; Amendment 208
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 19 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point f a (new) (fa)  The interconnection between the Member States databases referred to in paragraph 1 and any other relevant database, including the Information Management System for Official Controls (IMSOC). Amendment 209
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 20 a (new) Article 20a National information campaigns concerning stray animal legislation and protection 1.  The Member States are encouraged, in collaboration with the competent authorities, to initiate and implement national information campaigns concerning existing legislation on the protection and welfare of dogs and cats. These campaigns should be targeted at both animal owners and the general public in order to raise awareness of legal obligations and good practices in relation to animal care. 2.  Information campaigns can be run by the competent authorities in collaboration with animal protection organisations, veterinarians and other relevant entities. The information provided must include: (a)  The legal obligations of pet owners; (b)  The responsibilities and actions of local authorities in managing stray animals, and actions to prevent abandonment; (c)  Recommended steps if a person finds a lost or abandoned animal, including contacting veterinary services, animal shelters or the local police; (d)  The importance of responsible adoption and neutering to reduce the population of stray animals. 3.  The Member States can provide national or regional funding for these campaigns and can encourage the mass media and educational institutions to participate with a view to better dissemination of information. 4.  The European Commission shall encourage the sharing of good practices between the Member States. Amendment 210
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 20 b (new) Article 20b Measures to prevent abandonment and promote the neutering of dogs and cats 1.  The Member States are encouraged, in collaboration with the competent authorities, to adopt concrete measures to prevent abandonment of dogs and cats, including by educating the public, making owners responsible and enforcing existing legislation effectively. 2.  To reduce the number of stray animals, the Member States are encouraged to identify and use national and private financing sources for: (a)  Free or subsidised neutering campaigns for stray dogs and cats and pets of persons on low incomes or animal protection organisations; (b)  Programmes to register and identify pets, including by microchipping, to facilitate adoption and the return of lost animals to owners and to prevent abandonment; (c)  Actions to raise awareness and educate the public with regard to the responsibility of owning a pet and the adverse effects of abandonment on animal welfare and the community. 3.  The Member States can work together with non-governmental organisations, veterinary clinics and local authorities to implement these measures and facilitate public access to neutering and identification programmes. Amendment 211
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 20 c (new) Article 20c Data protection 1.  The competent authorities of the Member States shall be controllers within the meaning of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 in relation to the processing of personal data collected under Article 7, Article 7a and Article 19(1) of this Regulation. The Commission shall be a controller within the meaning of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 in relation to the processing of personal data collected under Article 17(6) and the second subparagraph of Article 21(4) of this Regulation. It shall be prohibited for any person having access to the personal data referred to in the first and second sub-paragraphs to divulge any personal data, the knowledge of which was acquired in the exercise of their duties or otherwise incidentally to such exercise. Member States and the Commission shall take all appropriate measures to address infringements of that prohibition. The personal data collected under the first and second sub-paragraphs shall not be used for other purposes than official control of the compliance with the welfare and traceability requirements under this regulation and detection of fraudulent practices with a view to the adoption of control measures. 2.  That personal data referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article shall be retained for the following periods: (a)  in the case of Article 7 and Article 7a, 10 years after the date of cessation of the activity of the establishment; (b)  in the case of Article 19(1), 20 years after the first registration of the dog or cat in the database referred to in that Article or 5 years after the recording of the death of the dog or cat in that database; (c)  in the case of the second subparagraph of Article 21(4a), 5 years after the date of pre-notification. Amendment 212
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 21 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1.  From [5 years from the date of entry into force of this Regulation], dogs and cats may only be entered into the Union for placing on the Union market if they have been kept in compliance with any of the following: 1.  Dogs and cats may only be entered into the Union for placing on the market provided that the following conditions are met: Amendment 213
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 21 – paragraph 1 – point a (a)  Chapters II of this Regulation; (a)  they have been breed and kept in compliance with any of the following: Amendment 214
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 21 – paragraph 1 – point a – point i (new) (i)  Chapter II of this Regulation; Amendment 215
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 21 – paragraph 1 – point b (b)   conditions recognised by the Union to be equivalent to those set out by this Regulation; or (ii)  conditions recognised by the Union in accordance with Article 129 of Regulation (EU) 2017/625 to be equivalent to those set out by Chapter II of this Regulation; or Amendment 216
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 21 – paragraph 1 – point c (c)  where applicable, requirements contained in a specific agreement between the Union and the exporting country (iii)  where applicable, requirements contained in a specific agreement between the Union and the exporting country. Amendment 217
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 21 – paragraph 2 2.   From [5 years from date of entry into force of this Regulation], dogs and cats may only be entered into the Union for placing on the market or supply provided that they come from a third country or territory and an establishment listed in accordance with Articles 126 and 127 of Regulation (EU) 2017/625. (b)   they come from a third country or territory and an establishment listed in accordance with Articles 126 and 127 of Regulation (EU) 2017/625. Amendment 218
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 21 – paragraph 3 3.   From [date of entry into force of this Regulation + 5 years], the official certificate accompanying dogs and cats entering into the Union from third countries and territories shall contain an attestation certifying compliance with paragraphs 1 and confirming that the dogs and cats originate from an establishment listed in accordance with paragraph 2. 2.  The official certificate referred to in Article 126(2)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/625 accompanying dogs and cats entering into the Union from third countries and territories to be placed on the Union market, shall contain an attestation certifying compliance with paragraph 1 of this Article. Amendment 219
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 21 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 4.  Without prejudice to Article 10(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 576/2013 and Article 74(1) of Regulation (EU) 2020/69211 , dogs and cats entering into the Union shall be identified with a microchip as referred to in Article 17(1) and allowing for traceability. 3.  Without prejudice to Article 10(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 576/2013 and Article 74(1) of Regulation (EU) 2020/69211 , dogs and cats entering into the Union to be placed on the Union market, shall be identified before their entry by a veterinarian with a microchip. compliant with Annex II . The importer shall ensure the registration of dogs and cats by a veterinarian into a national database, referred to in Article 19 within two working days after their entry into the Union. Member States may allow the registration by other persons than veterinarians, provided that they have measures in place to ensure the accuracy of information inserted in the database. __________________ __________________ 11 Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/692 of 30 January 2020 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2016/429 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards rules for entry into the Union, and the movement and handling after entry of consignments of certain animals, germinal products and products of animal origin, OJ L 174, 3.6.2020, p. 379. 11 Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/692 of 30 January 2020 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2016/429 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards rules for entry into the Union, and the movement and handling after entry of consignments of certain animals, germinal products and products of animal origin, OJ L 174, 3.6.2020, p. 379. Amendment 306
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 21 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 In case the dogs or cats entering into the Union are not yet registered in a Member State database as referred to in Article 19(1), once they arrive at their place of destination, the owner or person responsible for the animal shall ensure their registration into one of the Member States databases within 48 hours of arrival. In case the dogs or cats entering into the Union are not yet registered in a Member State database as referred to in Article 19(1), they shall be registered in the database of the Member State of entry by a veterinarian at the Union border. The registration shall be made in the name of the owner or person responsible for the animal and it shall record the establishment of origin listed in accordance with paragraph 2. Member States may allow the registration by persons other than veterinarians, provided that they have measures in place to ensure the accuracy of information inserted in the database. Amendment 221
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 21 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a.  The entry of dogs and cats into the Union under a non-commercial movement, as defined in point 14 of Article 4 of Regulation (EU) 2016/429, shall be pre-notified by their owners into an online Union pet travellers’ database at least five working days before the crossing of the Union border, except in the following cases: (a)  dogs or cats entering into the Union directly from third countries listed in accordance with Article 13(1) of Regulation (EU) No 576/2013; (b)  dogs or cats registered in a Member State database referred to in Article 19(1). The owner shall pre-notify the identity of the dog or cat and where relevant the identity of the authorised person travelling with that dog or cat, the identification number of the microchip of the dog or cat, its main destination in the Union, and where relevant the planned date and place of exit from the Union. Where the dog or cat stays more than four months in the Union, the owner shall ensure its registration in the database of the Member State of residence within five working days after the expiry of that fourth month. The Commission shall establish and maintain the Union pet travellers’ database referred to in the second subparagraph, and may entrust the development, maintenance and operation of this database to an independent entity, following a public selection process, pursuant to the relevant provisions of Title VII of the Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046. Access to this database shall be restricted to Member States’ competent authorities. Amendment 222
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 21 – paragraph 5 5.  The Commission is empowered, by means of implementing acts, to establish a procedure for the recognition by the Union of equivalent conditions under point paragraph 1 point (b). Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 24. deleted Amendment 223
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 22 – paragraph 1 – introductory part The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 23 amending the Annexes to this Regulation to take into account of scientific and technical progress, including, when relevant, scientific opinions of EFSA, and of social, economic and environmental impacts, as regards: The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 23 amending the Annexes to this Regulation to take into account of scientific and technical progress, including, when relevant, scientific opinions of the European Food Safety Authority, and of social, economic, and environmental impacts, as regards: Amendment 224
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 22 – paragraph 1 – point a (a)  feeding frequencies and weaning process; (a)  watering and feeding requirements and weaning process; Amendment 225
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 22 – paragraph 1 – point c (c)  lighting parameters; (c)  lighting requirements; Amendment 226
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 22 – paragraph 1 – point h (h)  minimum age of bitches and queens for onset of breeding; (h)  minimum and maximum age of bitches and queens for breeding; Amendment 227
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 22 – paragraph 1 – point j (j)  requirements for transponders used to mark dogs and cats; (j)  requirements for transponders used to individually identify dogs and cats; Amendment 228
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 23 – paragraph 2 2.  The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Article 6(4), Article 10(2) and Article 22 shall be conferred on the Commission for an indeterminate period of time from [the date of entry into force of this Regulation]. 2.  The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Article 6(2b), Article 6a(3) and Article 22 shall be conferred on the Commission for an indeterminate period of time from [the date of entry into force of this Regulation]. Amendment 229
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 23 – paragraph 3 3.  The delegation of power referred to in Article 6(4), Article 10(2) and Article 22 may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council. A decision to revoke shall put an end to the delegation of the power specified in that decision. It shall take effect the day following the publication of the decision in the Official Journal of the European Union or at a later date specified therein. It shall not affect the validity of any delegated acts already in force. 3.  The delegation of power referred to in Article 6(2b), Article 6a(3) and Article 22 may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council. A decision to revoke shall put an end to the delegation of the power specified in that decision. It shall take effect the day following the publication of the decision in the Official Journal of the European Union or at a later date specified therein. It shall not affect the validity of any delegated acts already in force. Amendment 230
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 23 – paragraph 6 6.  A delegated act adopted pursuant to Article 6(4), Article 10(2) and Article 22 shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed either by the European Parliament or by the Council within a period of two months of notification of that act to the European Parliament and the Council or if, before the expiry of that period, the European Parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission that they will not object. That period shall be extended by two months at the initiative of the European Parliament or of the Council. 6.  A delegated act adopted pursuant to Article 6(2b), Article 6a(3) and Article 22 shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed either by the European Parliament or by the Council within a period of two months of notification of that act to the European Parliament and the Council or if, before the expiry of that period, the European Parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission that they will not object. That period shall be extended by two months at the initiative of the European Parliament or of the Council. Amendment 231
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 25 – paragraph 1 1.  This Regulation shall not prevent Member States from maintaining any stricter national rules aimed at a more extensive protection of the welfare of dogs and cats and in force at the time of entry into force of this Regulation, provided that those rules are not inconsistent with this Regulation and do not interfere with the proper functioning of the internal market. Before [the date of application of this Regulation], Member States shall inform the Commission about such national rules. The Commission shall bring them to the attention of the other Member States. 1.  This Regulation shall not prevent Member States from maintaining or adopting any stricter national rules aimed at a more extensive protection of the welfare of dogs and cats, and to their traceability, provided that those rules are not inconsistent with this Regulation and do not interfere with the proper functioning of the internal market. Member States shall inform the Commission about such national rules. The Commission shall bring them to the attention of the other Member States. Amendment 232
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 25 – paragraph 2 2.  This Regulation shall not prevent Member States from adopting stricter national measures aimed at ensuring more extensive protection of the welfare of dogs and cats kept in establishments within the territory of a Member State on the following animal welfare issues: deleted (a)  housing conditions; (b)  mutilations; (c)  enrichment; (d)  selection and breeding programmes, including minimum and maximum age for breeding. Member States shall inform the Commission about such national rules before their adoption. The Commission shall bring them to the attention of the other Member States. Amendment 233
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 25 – paragraph 3 3.  The measures referred to in paragraph 2 shall only be allowed provided that they are not inconsistent with this Regulation and do not interfere with the proper functioning of the internal market. deleted Amendment 234
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 25 – paragraph 4 4.  Member States shall not prohibit or impede the placing on the market within their territory of dogs and cats kept in another Member State on the grounds that the dogs and cats concerned have not been kept in accordance with its stricter national rules on animal welfare. 4.  Member States that have stricter national rules referred to in paragraph 1 shall not prohibit or impede the placing on the market within their territory of dogs and cats kept in another Member State on the grounds that the dogs and cats concerned have not been kept in accordance with its stricter national rules on animal welfare. Amendment 235
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 26 – paragraph 1 1.  On the basis of the reports received in accordance with Article 20 and additional relevant information, the Commission shall publish, by [7 years after the date of entry into force of this Regulation] and thereafter every 5 years, a monitoring report on the welfare of dogs and cats placed on the market in the Union. 1.  On the basis of the reports received in accordance with Article 20 and additional relevant information, the Commission shall publish, by [7 years after the date of entry into force of this Regulation] and thereafter every 5 years, a monitoring report on the welfare of dogs and cats placed on the market in the Union. The monitoring report shall assess the effectiveness, efficiency, relevance, coherence, socio-economic impact and EU added value of this Regulation in achieving its objectives. In particular, the Commission shall assess: Amendment 236
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 26 – paragraph 1 – point a (new) (a)  the extent to which this Regulation has contributed to ensuring a high level of welfare for dogs and cats, improving traceability, reducing illegal trade, and addressing the problems associated with inhumane breeding practices, including so-called puppy and kitten mills; Amendment 237
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 26 – paragraph 1 – point b (new) (b)  whether the scope of this Regulation remains fit for purpose, taking into account market developments, scientific and technological progress, and animal welfare considerations; and whether the current exceptions remain appropriate and sufficient in light of these developments; Amendment 238
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 26 – paragraph 1 – point c (new) (c)  whether scientific and technological progress has occurred, including development of new means of identification, taking into account their technical reliability, cost-effectiveness and invasiveness for the animal; Amendment 239
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 26 – paragraph 1 – point d (new) (d)  the impact of this Regulation on breeders, shelters, foster homes, and other operators, including the administrative burden and compliance costs; Amendment 240
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 26 – paragraph 1 – point e (new) (e)  the level of enforcement and compliance achieved by Member States, and the effectiveness of the cooperation between competent authorities, including data exchange and traceability mechanisms, Amendment 241
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 26 – paragraph 1 – point f (new) (f)  the feasibility, costs and benefits of introducing a digital passport for dogs and cats which could contain information on the identification, vaccination status and medical history of the animal. Amendment 242
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 26 – paragraph 1 – point g (new) (g)  the feasibility, impact and proportionality of extending mandatory identification and registration to all dogs and cats, including those kept by private owners, Amendment 243
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 26 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a.  By … [2 years from the date of entry into force of this Regulation], the Commission shall assess the possibility of registering dogs and cats, in accordance with Article 21(3), upon their entry into the Union, and shall present a report on its main findings to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Amendment 244
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 26 – paragraph 2 2.  By [15 years from the date of entry into force of this Regulation], the Commission shall carry out an evaluation of this Regulation, including an assessment of a possible maximum age for breeding of dogs and cats, and present a report on the main findings to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, and the Committee of the Regions. 2.  By [12 years from the date of entry into force of this Regulation], the Commission shall carry out an evaluation of this Regulation, including an assessment of a possible maximum age for breeding of dogs and cats, and present a report on the main findings to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, and the Committee of the Regions. Amendment 301
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 26 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a.   By … [5 years after the date of entry into force of this Regulation], the Commission shall: (a)  carry out an evaluation and a review of this Regulation, including an assessment of a possible maximum age for the breeding of dogs and cats; (b)  carry out an assessment of the situation of stray animals; (c)  establish a list of animal species allowed to be kept and placed on the market, where a prior impact assessment has shown its added value and feasibility; (d)  assess the potential extension of the scope of this Regulation to include other animals by amending this Regulation; (e)  assess the possibility of using alternative means of identification which are less invasive than the implantation of a transponder; and (f)  present a report on the main findings of points (a) to (e) to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, and the Committee of the Regions. Amendment 245
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 27 – paragraph 1 Member States shall lay down the rules on penalties applicable to infringements of this Regulation and shall take all measures necessary to ensure that they are implemented. The penalties provided for shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive. Member States shall lay down the rules on penalties applicable to infringements of this Regulation, as well as those resulting from the abandonment of pets, and shall take all measures necessary to ensure that they are implemented. The penalties provided for shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive. Amendment 246
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 27 – paragraph 1 a (new) Member States shall ensure that the level of the financial penalties imposed for violations of this Regulation and of the rules referred to in Article 2(1), involving fraud or deception, reflects, in accordance with national law, at least the economic advantage for the operator, or, where appropriate, a percentage of the operator´s turnover and is high enough to have a deterrent effect. In cases where the infringements of the requirements of this Regulation are serious and repeated, Member States shall ensure that the penalties include a prohibition on working with and owning animals. Amendment 279
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 27 – paragraph 2 a (new) Considering the administrative burden of animal shelters and organisations responsible for the management of populations of stray dogs and cats in addition to the existing economic constraints, Member States may explore the capabilities of streamlining resources recovered from infringements of this Regulation to support and cover the administrative and operational costs of shelters and organisations responsible for the management of stray populations of dogs or cats. Amendment 247
    Proposal for a regulation
    Article 28 – paragraph 2 It shall apply from [2 years from the date of entry into force of this Regulation], unless otherwise provided for in this Regulation. It shall apply from [2 years from the date of entry into force of this Regulation], except: (i)  Article 13 from 5 years from the date of entry into force of this Regulation; (ii)  Article 9(2) and Article 19(1) from 3 years from the date of entry into force of this Regulation; (iii)  Article 12, Article 17(4) and (6), Article 19(2) and (2a), and Article 21(1) to (4a) from 5 years from the date of entry into force of this Regulation; (iv)  Article 7a from 6 years from the date of entry into force of this Regulation; and (v)  Article 17(1) to (3) – in relation to dogs from 3 years from the date of entry into force of this Regulation – in relation to cats 7 years from the date of entry into force of this Regulation.. Amendment 248
    Proposal for a regulation
    Annex I – point 1 – introductory part 1.  Feeding 1.  Feeding and watering Amendment 249
    Proposal for a regulation
    Annex I – point 1 – point 1.1 – introductory part 1.1.  The operator shall implement the following feeding frequencies: 1.1.  Dogs and cats shall be fed at least twice per day. Puppies and kittens shall be fed more frequently. These requirements shall not apply to breeding establishments where livestock guardian dogs are kept during the periods when such dogs are used for herding purposes. Amendment 250
    Proposal for a regulation
    Annex I – point 1 – point 1.1 – point a (a)  adult cats and dogs shall be fed twice a day; deleted Amendment 252
    Proposal for a regulation
    Annex I – point 1 – point 1.1 – point c (c)  puppies under 8 weeks of age shall be fed at least 5 times a day; deleted Amendment 253
    Proposal for a regulation
    Annex I – point 1 – point 1.1 – point d (d)  kittens under 12 weeks of age shall be fed at least 4 times a day. deleted Amendment 254
    Proposal for a regulation
    Annex I – point 1 – point 1.2 1.2.  Every new-born puppy or kitten shall be fed with colostrum from their bitch or queen in the first two days of their lives. 1.2.  Each puppy or kitten shall be fed with colostrum during at least the first two days of its life and thereafter with milk from its mother or a lactating bitch or queen. If this is not possible, because is ill or is otherwise unable to feed her offspring or not sufficient, the puppy or kitten shall be fed with a milk replacer designed for puppies and kittens with such feeding frequency as instructed by the producer of the replacer or by a veterinarian. Amendment 255
    Proposal for a regulation
    Annex I – point 1 – point 1.3 1.3.  If the bitch or the queen is ill or is otherwise unable to feed her offspring, the operator shall provide milk from other bitches and queens at the same holding and supplementary milk formulas designed for puppies and kittens with the feeding frequency as instructed by the formula producer or a veterinarian, until weaning is completed. deleted Amendment 256
    Proposal for a regulation
    Annex I – point 1 – point 1.4 1.4.  The operator shall ensure that all unweaned puppies and kittens are getting enough milk to steadily gain bodyweight. 1.4.  All unweaned puppies and kittens shall be fed enough milk, milk replacer or a combination thereof to steadily gain bodyweight. Amendment 257
    Proposal for a regulation
    Annex I – point 2 – point 2.1 – paragraph 1 – point a (a)  10 to 26°C in the indoor areas where adult dogs are kept; deleted Amendment 258
    Proposal for a regulation
    Annex I – point 2 – point 2.1 – paragraph 1 – point b (b)  15 to 26°C in the indoor areas where adult cats are kept; deleted Amendment 259
    Proposal for a regulation
    Annex I – point 2 – point 2.2 – point 2.2.1 2.2.1.  Where applicable, artificial lighting shall be provided for a period at least equivalent to the period of natural light normally available between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. 2.2.1.  Dogs and cats shall be exposed to light for at least 7 hours per day. Amendment 260
    Proposal for a regulation
    Annex I – point 2 – point 2.2 – point 2.2.2 2.2.2.  Artificial light shall be broad spectrum or full spectrum. 2.2.2.  Artificial light shall be broad spectrum or full spectrum with a frequency of at least 80 Hertz. Amendment 261
    Proposal for a regulation
    Annex I – point 2 – point 2.2 – point 2.2.3 2.2.3.  The illuminance shall be at least 50 lux at the height of an animal’s head. deleted Amendment 262
    Proposal for a regulation
    Annex I – point 2 – point 2.2 – point 2.2.4 2.2.4.  Animals shall have the possibility to stay in the dark for at least 8 hours per day. 2.2.4.  Dogs and cats shall have the possibility to be without artificial lights for at least 8 hours per day. Amendment 263
    Proposal for a regulation
    Annex I – point 2 – point 2.2 a (new) 2.2a.  Dogs shall have access to an outdoor area or shall be walked daily for a minimum of 1 hour per day in total, to allow exercise, exploration and socialisation Amendment 264
    Proposal for a regulation
    Annex I – point 2 – point 2.3 – point 2.3.3 2.3.3.  If enclosures are occupied by more than one dog or cat, operators must ensure by taking specific measures (e.g., separation panels) that these animals do not pose threat to each other due to aggressive behaviour. 2.3.3.  If enclosures are occupied by more than one dog or cat, operators must ensure by taking specific measures (e.g., separation panels) that these animals do not pose threat to each other due to aggressive behaviour. Member States may grant derogations from the minimum space allowances requirements set out in paragraph 2.3.1 for hunting dogs used to living in packs. Amendment 265
    Proposal for a regulation
    Annex I – point 3 – point 3.2 3.2.  Bitches shall only be bred if their age is at least 18 months; 3.2.  Bitches shall only be bred from their second oestrus; Amendment 266
    Proposal for a regulation
    Annex I – point 3 – point 3.3 3.3.  Operators shall allow for up to 3 litters per bitch or queen within a period of 2 years. 3.3.  A bitch or queen shall not deliver more than 3 litters within a period of 2 years. Amendment 267
    Proposal for a regulation
    Annex I – point 3 – point 3.4 3.4.  After 3 consecutive litter-giving pregnancies of a bitch or a queen within a period of 2 years, operators shall ensure a recuperation period by preventing pregnancies of the bitch or queen for a period of at least 1 year. 3.4.  For bitches and queens that have delivered 3 litters, including stillborns within a period of 2 years, there shall be a recuperation period of at least 1 year. Amendment 268
    Proposal for a regulation
    Annex I – point 3 – point 3.4 a (new) 3.4a.  Any bitch or queen that has undergone two cesarean sections shall no longer be used for breeding Amendment 269
    Proposal for a regulation
    Annex I – point 3 – point 3.4 b (new) 3.4b.  Before any bitch aged 8 years or more and any queen aged 6 years or more, is used for breeding, it must have been physically examined by a veterinarian who confirms in writing that, at the time of the examination, there are no counter-indications to pregnancy. The operator shall keep the written confirmation referred for a period of at least 3 years Amendment 270
    Proposal for a regulation
    Annex I – point 4 – point 4.1 – point c (c)  areas where cats and dogs are kept are equipped with enrichment structures and items accessible to all animals, providing a stimulating environment, and reducing frustration of animals; (c)  areas where cats and dogs are kept are equipped with enrichment structures and items accessible to all animals, providing a stimulating environment, and if possible, structures for climbing and hiding, and reducing frustration of animals; Amendment 271
    Proposal for a regulation
    Annex II – introductory part Transponders used to mark cats and dogs as required in Article 16 shall meet the following requirements: Transponders used to individually identify dogs and cat as required in Article 17 and Article 21 shall meet the following requirements: Amendment 272
    Proposal for a regulation
    Annex III – point 1 1.  Number of dogs and cats microchipped per year as referred to in Article 17; 1.  Number of dogs and cats registered per year as referred to in Article 17 and Article 21(4); Amendment 273
    Proposal for a regulation
    Annex III – point 1 a (new) 1a.  Number of establishments registered per year in accordance with Article 7; Amendment 274
    Proposal for a regulation
    Annex III – point 2 2.  Number of breeding establishment approved per year as referred to in Article 16. 2.  Number of breeding establishments approved per year as referred to in Article 7a. Amendment 275
    Proposal for a regulation
    Annex III – point 2 a (new) 2a.   Number of breeding and selling establishments whose approval has been suspended or withdrawn per year.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Home testing kits for lifesaving checks against cervical cancer

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments 2

    Press release

    Home testing kits for lifesaving checks against cervical cancer

    Government to offer home-testing kits as part of the cervical screening programme under its upcoming 10 Year Health Plan.

    • Under screened women to be offered convenient HPV self-sampling kits under new 10 Year Health Plan 
    • Home kits offered to those who have missed their invite, making care more convenient and supporting our shift from treatment to prevention
    • New initiative builds on NHS’ personalised approach to cervical screening

    Women and people with a cervix* across England who haven’t come forward for vital health checks will be offered home-testing kits as part of the cervical screening programme under the upcoming 10 Year Health Plan.

    The ground-breaking initiative aims to revolutionise cervical cancer prevention rates by tackling deeply entrenched barriers that keep some women away from potentially life-saving screenings, including a fear of discomfort, embarrassment, cultural sensitivities and the struggle to find time for medical appointments.  

    Women who have rarely or have never attended their cervical screening will be offered a self-sample kit to complete at home. They are then sent out in discreet packaging and returned via pre-paid mail in the local post box.  

    Participation in cervical cancer screening currently sits at just 68.8% – well below the NHS England target of 80%. This means over 5 million women in England are not up to date with their routine check-up**. But experts believe this targeted approach could increase participation in the screening programme that saves approximately 5000 lives a year across England.   

    The initiative is part of the government’s upcoming 10 Year Health Plan – due to be published in the coming weeks – which sets out how government plans to tackle the challenges facing the health service and build an NHS that is fit for the future by doing more to prevent ill health in the first place.

    Health and Social Care Secretary Wes Streeting said:   

    These self-sampling kits represent healthcare that works around people’s lives, not the other way around. They put women firmly in control of their own health, ensuring we catch more cancers at their earliest, most treatable stages.

    Our 10 Year Health Plan will fundamentally reform the NHS, shifting focus from treating illness to preventing it before it starts.

    We know the earlier cancer is diagnosed the better the chances are of survival. By making screening more convenient, we’re tackling the barriers that keep millions of women from potentially life-saving tests.

    The self-testing kits, which detect human papillomavirus (HPV), a group of viruses that can lead to cervical cancer, allow women to carry out this testing in the privacy and convenience of their own homes.  

    Michelle Kane, NHS Director of Screening, said:

    There are a number of reasons that stop some women taking up the offer of screening and we hope the introduction of self-testing will encourage more women to take up this life-saving test in a way that works for them.

    I’d encourage anyone who gets an invite for a cervical screening, either from their local GP practice or the NHS App, to attend and if you have any worrying symptoms, please contact your GP. It could save your life.

    The programme specifically targets those groups consistently missing vital appointments, with younger women, ethnic minority communities facing cultural hurdles, people with a disability and LGBT+ people all set to benefit. 

    Anyone testing positive for HPV through self-sampling will be encouraged to attend a clinician-taken follow-up cervical screening test to check for cervical cell changes. 

    Athena Lamnisos, Chief Executive, Eve Appeal, said:

    There are so many different reasons why those who are eligible aren’t responding to their cervical screening invitation letter.

    HPV self-testing will be a step change for some. Being able to do the test in their own time and following simple instructions is what many people want and need. Ensuring that the under-screened and never screened know about this new test is vital for Eve.

    As the leading gynae cancer prevention charity, we know how vital it is to address health inequalities and make sure that everyone knows that this test is available to them and why it’s important.

    Michelle Mitchell, Chief Executive of Cancer Research UK, said: 

    Screening is a powerful tool to prevent cervical cancer and save lives, but we know it isn’t always easy for everyone to take part. For some, the test may seem uncomfortable, embarrassing, or simply hard to fit into their lives. That’s why we welcome the UK government’s decision to roll out cervical cancer home screening kits in England – to help remove barriers and make cervical screening more accessible.

    The gold standard way to test for HPV is still a sample taken by a clinician and this will be suitable for most people. But beating cervical cancer means beating it for everyone, and this move helps to bring us closer to that goal.  It’s important to remember that cervical screening is for people without symptoms so, if you notice any unusual changes for you, do not wait for a screening invitation – speak to your doctor.

    This approach builds on the NHS’ recent announcement to make cervical cancer screening more personalised. From July, women aged 25-49 who test negative for HPV in a clinician-taken test will be invited for their next test in five years, rather than three, following a recommendation by the UK National Screening Committee. The programme is in line with major clinical evidence that shows if a person tests negative for HPV they are extremely unlikely to go on to develop cervical cancer within the next decade. Anyone whose sample indicates the presence of HPV will continue to be invited to more frequent screenings.  

    Digital invitations and reminders for cervical screening were also recently rolled out as part of the NHS App’s ‘ping and book’ service to make screenings even more convenient, boost uptake and save lives.  

    Through our Plan for Change, the government is cutting waiting times for cancer patients with 99,000 extra patients having had cancer diagnosed or ruled out since July than in the previous year. In February, the highest ever proportion of patients had a diagnosis or an all clear within four weeks.

    Dr Anita Lim, Chief Investigator of the YouScreen trial and Visiting Senior Research Fellow, King’s College London:

    This is a significant step forward for cervical cancer prevention and brings us closer to the NHS goal of eliminating the disease by 2040. The YouScreen trial, which provided self-sampling HPV kits to under-screen women in London, demonstrated that self-sampling could reach people who find it difficult to attend traditional screening – including those from diverse and underserved populations.

    It’s hugely positive to see this now reflected in national policy, helping more people get protected from this highly preventable cancer.

    Gem, who was diagnosed with cervical cancer in 2015, said:

    My cervical cancer was picked up during a routine screening by my GP. I was referred for surgery to remove the cancer cells, as well as lymph nodes from my abdomen and pelvis.

    It took me about six weeks to recover, and because it was caught early and hadn’t spread, I was told at my follow-up appointment that I was cancer-free and didn’t require further treatment.

    I’ve been cancer-free for years now, but I still live with the aftermath of my diagnosis. I hope that one day we live in a world where cervical cancer is eliminated. With advances in vaccines and screening, I believe that day is getting ever closer.

    For many, though, there are barriers to attending screening. Our everyday lives are busy juggling jobs, family life, and more, which can make attending appointments difficult. But feelings of embarrassment, fear, or unease can also prevent people from going.

    Making it easier for people to access screening they can do at home removes some of those barriers and will, I’m sure, save lives.

    If I hadn’t attended screening when I did, I’m certain I would have been facing a very different outcome. I will always be thankful that I went when I did and now try to use my experience to help others.

    ENDS  

    Updates to this page

    Published 24 June 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Moscow is a city of youth: how student brigades help to realize oneself

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: Moscow Government – Government of Moscow –

    This year, from April to August, members of Moscow student brigades work at various sites across the country. Over 500 people remained to work in the capital. During the academic year, students and schoolchildren were selected for all-Russian and interregional work projects of Russian student brigades (RSB) – they completed tasks and participated in interviews.

    “Thanks to the opportunities in the capital, young residents of the capital can realize themselves in various areas from volunteering to creativity. Moscow student brigades are an active community that works for the benefit of the entire country. More than 3.5 thousand participants of student brigades work at sites throughout Russia, master professions, gain experience and contribute to the development of the most important sectors – from education to industry,” said

    Ekaterina Dragunova, Chairman of the Committee for Public Relations and Youth Policy of the City of Moscow.

    They receive a working specialty and begin their journey into the profession

    Currently, the Moscow regional branch of the RSO has over 150 teams in eight areas. They unite over 3.5 thousand students from 80 capital universities, 30 colleges and 80 schools. In the spring, the children received free training in working specialties in order to begin their path to the profession in the summer, gain their first work experience and contribute to the development of key industries in the country.

    “Moscow student brigades are professional growth and acquisition of flexible skills, experience, a team and, of course, youthful romance. Now students and schoolchildren begin their working summer at construction sites, the railway, in hospitals, hotels, children’s camps, agricultural complexes, on the fishing season and archaeological excavations. The guys work both in the capital and throughout Russia,” said Yulia Drozhzhina, chairperson of the board of Moscow student brigades, State Duma deputy.

    More than a thousand participants in the pedagogical direction work as counselors, shift leaders and program organizers in children’s camps in the Central Federal District, Krasnodar Krai, the Republic of Crimea and Primorye.

    Over 70 people represent Moscow in major RSO work projects as part of all-Russian student teaching teams. These are Gagarin in Anapa, Okean in Vladivostok, Delfin.ru in Krasnodar Krai, Orlyonok, Krasnaya Nit and Sputnik in Rostov Oblast. Muscovites also work at the International Children’s Center Artek in Yalta. In addition, the children will become counselors as part of the district student teaching team Solnechny. Their functions include holding leisure and developmental events and creating a comfortable environment for communication and socialization of children.

    Making Reality More Interesting Than a Smartphone: Moscow Camp Counselors Talk About Children, Games, and Teaching Techniques

    In student construction teams, the guys work at city, federal and international sites. They participate in ensuring the stable functioning of city systems – in servicing the heating stations of PJSC MOEK, the electric grid complexes of PJSC Rosseti and the Moscow Metro facilities. In addition, with the assistance of the administration of the capital’s universities, the guys build dormitories of the Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba and the innovative scientific and technological center of Moscow State University “Vorobyovy Gory”.

    They work on all-Russian student construction sites and international projects

    13 capital teams have been selected for five all-Russian labor projects of the RSO, including “Peaceful Atom — Leningrad NPP” in the city of Sosnovy Bor in the Leningrad Region, where they are taking part in the construction of the Leningrad NPP-2.

    In addition, student team members perform general construction work at the all-Russian student construction sites “Peaceful Atom” in Ozersk, Chelyabinsk Region, “Peaceful Atom – Skif” in Novosibirsk, “Peaceful Atom – Breakthrough” in Seversk, Tomsk Region, “Alabuga Stroy” in Yelabuga (Republic of Tatarstan), “Siberia”, as well as in the work projects of Aeroterminal LLC in Krasnodar and “Kovykta” at the Kovykta gas condensate field in the Irkutsk Region.

    25 students represent Moscow in international projects, ensuring the operation of power plants in the Arab Republic of Egypt, including the El Dabaa Nuclear Power Plant (NPP), as well as in the Republic of Bangladesh at the Rooppur NPP.

    Moscow student teams completed internships in more than 40 cities in RussiaSergei Sobyanin spoke about the work of Moscow student brigades

    They look after patients, work as orderlies and nurses

    The number of participants in medical teams is growing every year. Students from the capital’s famous medical universities provide support to the country’s healthcare system during the summer – they look after patients, work as orderlies and nurses in institutions throughout Russia.

    This year, in Moscow, they are working at the N.V. Sklifosovsky Research Institute of Emergency Care, the private healthcare institution “RZhD-Medicine Clinical Hospital named after N.A. Semashko”. Nine medical teams have been selected for all-Russian projects. From July, they will work in healthcare institutions on Sakhalin Island, Novosibirsk, Novokuznetsk, Chelyabinsk, Barnaul, Perm, Irkutsk and Tomsk, as well as in the Valeo district project in the Voronezh Region.

    Provide comfortable passenger transportation and service

    More than 200 participants in the conductor program ensure safe and comfortable passenger transportation on long-distance trains in the structural divisions of JSC Federal Passenger Company (Moscow-Kyiv and Nikolaevka). During trips, students control the placement of passengers according to tickets and serve them along the way, supervise safe boarding and disembarking on platforms, and monitor the technical condition of the carriage.

    This year, three student conductors became leaders of the all-Russian labor projects “Moscow” and “Adler”. Miron Ganichev from the student conductor team “Sinoger” based at the Russian State Agrarian University – Moscow Agricultural Academy named after K.A. Timiryazev took the position of instructor at the passenger car depot “Moscow-Kyiv”. Before each trip, he instructs students on labor protection and fire safety while working on the train.

    Participants in the service direction work as waiters, maids, lifeguards, bartenders, administrators and animators in hotels and sanatoriums on the Black Sea coast as part of the All-Russian student service teams “Sochi Park Hotel” in the city of Sochi, “Gelendzhik” in the city of the same name, “More” in Crimea.

    The “Runway” project in St. Petersburg allowed the children to become escorts for passengers with limited mobility, call center operators, inform passengers about airport services, clean aircraft cabins – raise seat backs, armrests and lay out blankets.

    For the first time this year, students began working at passenger check-in desks and became baggage handlers at Vnukovo Airport. On the Sapsan and Lastochka trains on the Moscow-St. Petersburg route, they hold the positions of waiter-stewards and serve passengers on high-speed trains. In addition, the guys work as waiters in the business lounges of Paveletsky and Kazansky railway stations in the center of the capital.

    They get jobs in admissions offices of universities and work in agriculture

    Another area of activity of service teams is administrative work at Moscow universities. Thus, students work in admissions committees of universities. They receive documents from applicants, form lists of applicants, draw up schedules for conducting entrance examinations and participate in summing up the results of the admissions campaign.

    Agricultural sector participants are involved in harvesting crops, working with cattle and poultry as veterinarians, livestock technicians, laboratory technicians, and much more.

    For example, this year students are participating in a large all-Russian project to harvest apples on the territory of OOO Agronom-Sad in Lipetsk Oblast and are being employed as winegrowers at AO Divnomorye in Krasnodar Krai.

    Students majoring in animal husbandry — veterinarians, zootechnicians, technologists and biologists — will try themselves at subsidiaries of the EkoNiva group of companies in the Voronezh region, at enterprises of the Damate group of companies in the Rostov region and at branches of Stavropolsky Broiler LLC.

    From July 1, members of the fishing teams will go to student fishing seasons in the Kamchatka and Khabarovsk regions as fish processors, caviar fishermen and short-distance fishing sailors.

    Moscow to open 65th summer work season of student teams

    They are on duty at MCC, MCD stations and railway stations

    This year, schoolchildren aged 14 to 17 years old, as part of the adolescent work teams, will work as hall attendants at the stations of the Moscow Central Circle, Moscow Central Diameters, and as attendants at the capital’s railway stations.

    For the first time this year, Moscow teenagers’ work teams were selected for the all-Russian work project “Alabuga TOP” in Yelabuga (Republic of Tatarstan). There they will become office managers for receiving and processing incoming calls in the office, and will clean residential premises and public places.

    More detailed information about the activities of Moscow student teams can be found in the community VKontakte or intelegram channel. You can learn more about the opportunities for young residents of the capital on the portal “Youth of Moscow” and in social networks project.

    Moscow is a city of youth. The capital offers wide opportunities for its development, creative self-expression, comfortable life and interesting leisure. It has a developed infrastructure, thousands of events of different scale and focus are held here.

    In honor of Youth Day, themed events will be held at more than 250 city venues. The flagship event will be the festival, which will take place on June 28 and 29 at Bolotnaya Square.

    You can find more detailed information and a map with all city events on the portal “Youth of Moscow”.

    Moscow student teams took part in the action “Snow landing of the RSO. Victory landing”From a conductor to a counselor: who can work in Moscow student groups

    Get the latest news quicklyofficial telegram channel the city of Moscow.

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    Please Note; This Information is Raw Content Directly from the Information Source. It is access to What the Source Is Stating and Does Not Reflect

    https: //vv.mos.ru/nevs/ite/155748073/

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Government Funding – Nurses need share of primary health care funding increase – NZNO

    Source: New Zealand Nurses Organisation

    Increases in primary care funding announced today must be passed onto nurses to fix chronic staff shortages so New Zealanders can get in to see health care professionals faster, the Nurses Organisation Tōputanga Tapuhi Kaitiaki o Aotearoa (NZNO) says.
    The Government funds GP clinics based on the number of enrolled patients they have, regardless of the services they receive, through what’s called the capitation system.
    Health Minister Simeon Brown today announced capitation funding for this year is set to increase to 13.89%.
    NZNO College of Primary Care Nurses chair Tracey Morgan says nurses are urging primary care employers to pass this funding increase onto them via their wages, Tracey Morgan says.
    “This will help stem the flow of nurses out of primary care and into hospitals.
    “A skilled nursing workforce is desperately needed to keep care in the community, ensure vaccination targets are met, ease pressure on hospital emergency departments and prevent long term conditions worsening.
    “During collective agreement bargaining last year, primary care nurses were 16-18% behind their hospital-based colleagues in pay. The employers told the union that if the money was available, they would willingly pass it on to nurses.”
    Primary care nurses will receive a 3% increase in July through their collective agreement which also gave them a further 5% on ratification earlier this year, Tracey Morgan says.
    “However, this will still have them 10% behind hospital nurses with the same qualifications.
    “Simeon Brown says this funding boost is help patients see their doctor and nurse earlier. The ability to recruit and retain primary health nurses is vital to achieving this,” Tracey Morgan says.

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: GPs to receive record funding boost

    Source: New Zealand Government

    General practices are set to benefit from the largest funding boost in New Zealand’s history – because frontline care starts with your local GP, Health Minister Simeon Brown says. 

    “This Government is focused on real results. When you are able to see your doctor or nurse earlier, you stay healthier and out of hospital. That’s better for patients, better for the system, and exactly what we are here to deliver,” Mr Brown says.

    “Too many New Zealanders have struggled to get care because their local GP isn’t taking new patients, or the next available appointment is weeks away. This funding boost is about turning things around. It’s part of our $1.37 billion investment in Health New Zealand through Budget 2025 – backing your local family doctor to see more patients, reduce wait times, and deliver care faster to those who need it most.

    “The funding agreement reached with the sector yesterday reflects another significant step forward and will support GPs to continue to improve access to timely, quality healthcare.”

    Under the agreement, GPs will receive a 13.89 per cent funding uplift this year. This brings the total Government funding increase for GP clinics this financial year to $175 million – more than double the highest annual increase seen since capitation was first rolled out.

    “This reflects our ongoing commitment to strengthen and invest in frontline services to ensure New Zealanders can get access to the timely, quality healthcare they deserve.

    “We have already announced major investments to boost the number of doctors and nurses working in primary care. This funding boost will enable GP clinics to recruit and retain the additional workers as they graduate.”

    This funding increase provides: 
     

    • $59 million capitation increase for the number of patients enrolled with individual general practices
    • $60 million for improved patient access to appointments, and to encourage practices to provide more data to enable more performance-based funding
    • $30 million performance-based funding for improved immunisation outcomes, specifically ensuring more babies receive their first vaccine doses at the six-week milestone
    • $26 million in additional funding to help GPs keep fees capped for community service card holders and those on low incomes and to prevent fee increases for under-14s.

    “Supporting GP clinics to deliver minor planned care procedures closer to patients in the community takes pressure directly off our hospitals.

    “That’s why a further $5 million to expand access to minor planned care procedures in the community will be made available to the sector once implementation details are worked through. This will reduce wait time for procedures such as minor gynaecological procedures, skin excisions, iron infusions, and oncology infusions.

    “Childhood immunisations are a key priority for this Government. We want to see 95 per cent of enrolled children fully immunised and we know GPs play a critical role in achieving that. That’s why this agreement includes performance payments for clinics that lift childhood immunisation rates by up to ten percentage points, or to 95 per cent of their enrolled population, with partial payment for partial achievement. 

    “This agreement marks a significant and positive step forward for the primary care system. It responds directly to consistent feedback from the sector over the past year about the need for a more sustainable and responsive funding model.

    “I expect this investment to deliver real results – including shorter wait times, easier access to care, and better health outcomes for patients.”

    The collection of more primary care data will further support a more effective funding approach and ensure resources are targeted at improving patient outcomes. 

    “This is part of the Government’s broader plan to rebuild and strengthen the foundations of our health system, with primary care at the centre, and to focus on performance and delivery.

    “This is the largest investment in general practice in decades – but more importantly, it’s tied to better results. Shorter wait times. Higher immunisation rates. More patients getting the care they need in the community. 

    “This is how you rebuild a health system – not with slogans, but with funding, focus, and delivery. 

    “I would like to thank the primary care sector representatives, including GenPro, GPNZ and Kāhui Tautoko who have worked with Health New Zealand in good faith on this record uplift,” Mr Brown says.

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: DH to launch final phase of HPV Vaccination Catch-up Programme on June 26

    Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

    DH to launch final phase of HPV Vaccination Catch-up Programme on June 26???
    The Controller of the CHP, Dr Edwin Tsui said, “In Hong Kong, cervical cancer was the ninth most common cancer among women in 2022, with 522 new cases and 167 deaths. The HPV vaccine is highly effective in preventing the high-risk types of HPV that most commonly cause cervical cancer. Following the recommendations of the World Health Organization, the DH launched the first phase of Programme in December last year to provide free vaccination for female full-time students studying in Secondary Five or above (including secondary sections of special schools). As of June 8, the coverage rate for the first dose of the HPV vaccine in the first phase of the Programme has exceeded 80 per cent. The second phase has begun in mid-March this year, offering free HPV vaccination to female Hong Kong residents born between 2004 and 2008 who are currently studying at local post-secondary institutions. All post-secondary institutions have participated.”

    Under the final phase of the Programme, all female Hong Kong residents born between 2004 and 2008 who are not currently studying and have not completed their HPV vaccination only need to register with eHealth first, after which they can make an appointment through the website or telephone number of the WWS under the PHCC of the HHB for free vaccination at the WWS and its service points, or designated District Health Centre (DHC)/Express (E). Appointments can be made starting today by calling the WWS at 2855 1333 or through its website (www.wws.org.hk/vaccineIssued at HKT 17:55

    NNNN

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – EMA’s role in COVID-19 vaccine approval procedures, inspections and good clinical practice checks – P-001695/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The highest standards in the evaluation of COVID-19 vaccines were applied by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). As for every other product it evaluates, EMA’s human medicines committee[1] (CHMP) considered the need for good clinical practice (GCP) inspections.

    Studies supporting the authorisation of a medicine must comply with GCP. Regulators can request and conduct inspections to verify compliance with the standards.

    Criteria used to select a GCP inspection is published[2]. When a GCP inspection is requested by the CHMP, EMA makes a call for available EU national GCP inspection resources.

    The Member States have the final say on whether to send inspectors for an EMA-coordinated inspection. During the COVID-19 pandemic, due to the restrictions to travel with a view to protect public health, regulators assessed the need for inspections and decided on a case-by-case basis the most appropriate and viable approach to take.

    The European Public Assessment Reports for Vaxzevria[3] and Comirnaty[4] are publicly available.

    The first cases of myocarditis that occurred in Israel in 2021 following vaccination with Comirnaty triggered a formal review by EMA[5].

    The outcome was that the risk for myocarditis and pericarditis was overall ‘very rare’ (up to one in 10 000 vaccinated people may be affected) with the highest risk in younger males[6].

    The product information of Comirnaty and Spikevax was revised adding myocarditis and pericarditis as new side effects with a warning to raise awareness.

    • [1] https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/committees/committee-medicinal-products-human-use-chmp.
    • [2] https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/other/points-consider-assessors-inspectors-european-medicines-agency-inspection-coordinators-identification-triggers-selection-applications-routine-cause-inspections-their-investigation-scope-such_en.pdf.
    • [3] Vaxzevria (previously COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca), INN-COVID-19-Vaccine-(ChAdOx1-S-[recombinant]) https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/assessment-report/vaxzevria-previously-covid-19-vaccine-astrazeneca-epar-public-assessment-report_en.pdf.
    • [4] https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/assessment-report/comirnaty-epar-public-assessment-report_en.pdf.
    • [5] https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/report/report-pharmacovigilance-tasks-eu-member-states-and-european-medicines-agency-ema-2019-2022_en.pdf.
    • [6] Meeting highlights from the Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) 29 November — 2 December 2021 https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/news/meeting-highlights-pharmacovigilance-risk-assessment-committee-prac-29-november-2-december-2021.
    Last updated: 23 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Liability exemptions in EU vaccine contracts – E-001495/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The (Advanced) Purchase Agreements for the supply of COVID-19 vaccines to the Member States were concluded in full transparency with the Member States. Negotiations were carried out by a Joint Negotiation Team that consisted of representatives of the Commission and of several Member States.

    This team reported regularly to a Vaccines Steering Board co-chaired by the Commission and a Participating Member State, which provided guidance throughout the process.

    The Commission has provided information to the Parliament on a continuous basis, in line with its Treaty obligations and the framework Agreement on relations between the two institutions[1].

    All mRNA vaccines that receive a marketing authorisation are based on a thorough review by the European Medicine Agency (EMA), of clinical evidence confirming a favourable benefit-risk profile.

    Adapted versions are also approved based on data showing their ability to induce an immune response that can predict clinical efficacy and safety.

    T he safety profile of all medicinal products authorised in the EU, including mRNA vaccines, is subject to continuous monitoring. There is a robust pharmacovigilance system established in the EU to detect, assess, and address potential side effects[2].

    The Commission and Member States considered early introduction of the vaccine to be in the interest of public health. Member States were therefore willing to reduce manufacturers’ risks linked to liability for adverse effects[3].

    A citizen who has suffered adverse effects from one of the COVID-19 vaccines purchased under the contracts can claim damages against the manufacturer of the vaccine[4].

    • [1] The Commission has pro-actively published redacted versions of the contracts concluded with the vaccine producers on its website.
    • [2] https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/human-regulatory-overview/pharmacovigilance-overview.
    • [3] This was intended as a risk sharing principle in the vaccine strategy.
    • [4] If the claim is successful, the Member State that administered the vaccine can, under certain conditions, be responsible for compensating the injured party and paying the vaccine manufacturer’s legal costs (indemnification).
    Last updated: 23 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Global: I’m an expert in crafting public health messages: Here are 3 marketing strategies I use to make Philadelphia healthier

    Source: The Conversation – USA – By Sarah Bauerle Bass, Professor of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Temple University

    A comic book produced for Black transgender women in Philadelphia explains the benefits of using PrEP to prevent HIV infection. Wriply Bennet for the Risk Communication Laboratory, Temple University

    In Philadelphia, the leading causes of death are heart disease, cancer and unintentional drug overdose. While some of these deaths are caused by things out of our control – like genetics – many are largely preventable.

    Preventable deaths are the result of a series of decisions. Whether a person decides to smoke, eat lots of fried foods or be a couch potato, their decisions – sometimes unconsciously – can affect their health.

    I’m a health communication expert and public health researcher at Temple University in North Philadelphia. I began working in public health in the late 1980s at the beginning of the HIV/AIDS epidemic, and before that I worked in marketing and public relations. I have spent my career thinking about how health decisions are like many of the decisions consumers make each day around which products to buy.

    One key difference with health decisions is the inherent risks involved. There isn’t much risk in trying a new brand of cereal, but there is risk in riding a motorcycle without a helmet.

    Many people have a “that won’t happen to me” attitude when making a decision that involves risk. This element of “risk perception” has guided my interest in health decisions and how to use commercial marketing techniques – the same ones companies use to sell products – to encourage people to get vaccinated, get a colonoscopy or get treated for a medical condition.

    Temple students involved in the RapidVax project talk to Kensington residents about COVID-19 vaccinations during the pandemic.
    Temple University College of Public Health

    Breaking demographics into psychographics

    One strategy I use is segmentation analysis.

    Segmentation analysis is the process of looking at groups of people who may look like they are all similar on the surface – such as Black women from North Philadelphia – and then breaking them into smaller groups based on differences in their attitudes, beliefs or behaviors.

    Looking at these “psychographics” instead of demographics like age or sex can help public health communication researchers better understand how to communicate effectively.

    For example, I led a study in 2021 that looked at how connected transgender women living in Philadelphia and the San Francisco Bay Area felt to other members of the trans community. We wanted to see if messaging about PrEP, or pre-exposure prophylaxis, the medication used to prevent HIV infection, would need to be different depending on how connected they felt.

    We found that participants who were more engaged with the trans community were not only more knowledgeable about PrEP, but they were also more likely to see the benefits of using it compared with those who were less engaged.

    This indicates that strategies to reach those not as connected may need to include, for example, providing more basic information about what PrEP is and how it works.

    An example of perceptual mapping that shows different attitudes and beliefs around the HIV prevention medication PrEP.
    Temple University College of Public Health

    Mathematical models and 3D maps

    Another powerful marketing tool that I use is a process known as perceptual mapping and vector message modeling.

    Using simple survey answers, we can mathematically model how people are thinking about a health decision and present it in a three-dimensional map.

    Similar to how someone might think about the relationship between where cities or countries are in relation to each other – such as where Philadelphia is in relation to New York or Chicago – we can take answers from a survey and convert them into distances. We ask people to agree or disagree to statements about the benefits or barriers to a decision and enter their responses into a computer program to create the map.

    We can then do vector message modeling, which shows how to move the group toward the desired decision.

    Think back to high school physics when you may have learned about the amount of force, or pushing and pulling, needed to move one object toward another. Vector message modeling helps us figure out which beliefs to push or pull against to get the group to move toward a particular decision, and it helps us create the most persuasive messages for that group.

    When we use vector modeling along with segmentation analysis, we can also compare how messaging may need to be similar or different for different groups.

    For example, I used segmentation analysis and then perceptual mapping and vector message modeling to understand how medical mistrust might affect the decision to get vaccinated for COVID-19 among a group of Philadelphians who had not yet been vaccinated.

    Education materials created after using commercial marketing techniques to identify persuasive messages about COVID-19 booster shots.
    Temple University College of Public Health

    Our team then looked at perceptual maps and vector message modeling by levels of mistrust. The vectors showed that those with high levels of medical mistrust would be more likely to respond to messages that addressed concerns about the pandemic being a hoax, or the worry that minorities wouldn’t get the same treatment as others.

    This allowed us to think about how to build in messages around those issues in public media campaigns or other communication strategies that encourage vaccination.

    Decision-making tools

    I have used these methods to create and test a number of different communication strategies to influence health decisions.

    For example, I’ve developed web-based tools that have been used in hospitals and clinics in Philadelphia to encourage methadone patients with hepatitis C to receive antiviral treatment for their infection, Black cancer patients to take part in a clinical trial or to get genetic testing, and patients with low literacy and higher risk of colorectal cancer to have a colonoscopy.

    Staff members from the Risk Communication Laboratory organize materials to educate North Philadelphia residents about COVID-19 booster shots.
    Temple University College of Public Health

    My colleagues and I have also developed posters, booklets and social media posts that encourage low-income and vaccine-hesitant Philadelphians in Kensington to get COVID-19 booster shots; educational slides for low-literacy Philadelphia adults on dirty bombs and how the radioactive weapons might be used in a terror attack; and a comic book for trans women to learn about the benefits of PrEP use.

    Getting people to make better decisions about their health can be an uphill battle. We all have our reasons for not doing things that are good for us. For example, what did you eat for lunch today? Was it healthy? If not, why did you eat it?

    My job is to figure out what makes people do what they do, and then help them make decisions that keep them healthy.

    Read more of our stories about Philadelphia.

    Sarah Bauerle Bass has received funding from a number of organizations, including the National Institutes of Health, the American Cancer Society, Pennsylvania and Philadelphia Departments of Health, and independent pharma research grants from Gilead and Merck.

    ref. I’m an expert in crafting public health messages: Here are 3 marketing strategies I use to make Philadelphia healthier – https://theconversation.com/im-an-expert-in-crafting-public-health-messages-here-are-3-marketing-strategies-i-use-to-make-philadelphia-healthier-254905

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI Africa: Deputy President concludes working visit to Russia

    Source: South Africa News Agency

    Deputy President concludes working visit to Russia

    Deputy President Paul Mashatile has returned to South Africa after successfully concluding a working visit to Russia, which included engagements in Moscow and St. Petersburg, said the Presidency on Monday.

    His activities were focused on strengthening the bilateral trade and economic relations between South Africa and Russia.
    Deputy President Mashatile arrived in Moscow on Tuesday, 17 June 2025. 

    He was welcomed by Russia’s Deputy Head of State Protocol Andrei Milyaev, Deputy Director of the African Department Andrei Stotlarov, and Deputy Minister of International Relations and Cooperation Alvin Botes. 

    The visit began in earnest with the Deputy President laying wreaths at the Mausoleum of Moses Kotane and J.B. Marks, located in the Novodevichy Cemetery, a United Nations Heritage Site in Moscow.

    Kotane and Marks were anti-apartheid activists who played pivotal roles in the South African Communist Party and the African National Congress. 

    Initially buried for years in Moscow, their remains were subsequently returned by the South African Government and reburied in the North West in 2015.

    In Moscow, Deputy President Mashatile met with Prime Minister Mikhail Mishustin at the Russian House of the Government. 
    They discussed opportunities for enhancing bilateral political and economic cooperation between South Africa and Russia.
    The dialogue focused on various areas for further collaboration, including trade and investment, minerals and energy, agriculture, health, and education.

    Deputy President Mashatile travelled to St. Petersburg State University, where he delivered a public lecture on the theme “South Africa’s G20 Presidency in a Rapidly Changing Geopolitical Environment.” 

    The audience for the lecture included faculty professors, students, members of the academic community, as well as media representatives and members of the diplomatic corps.

    READ | Deputy President calls for solidarity as global landscape changes

    In St. Petersburg, the Deputy President visited President Vladimir Putin at the Constantine Palace, where they held bilateral meetings with the Russian delegation, which included Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov.

    The Deputy President expressed gratitude, on behalf of President Cyril Ramaphosa and the citizens, for Russia’s support in the anti-apartheid struggle and its contributions to socio-economic emancipation beyond the achievement of freedom and democracy.

    “I have been tasked by the President to work tirelessly towards the translation of the strong foundation of our strategic relations into higher trade and economic ties for the mutual benefit of our countries and our people,” said the Deputy President.

    He delivered remarks during the plenary session of the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum (SPIEF’25), following President Putin’s address. 

    READ | SA supports the inclusion of more voices at SPIEF 

    In addition, the Deputy President spoke at the South African Trade and Investment Seminar at SPIEF’25, which was attended by business and government leaders from both Russia and South Africa.

    “We are pleased to note that through regular Parliamentary exchanges and engagements, we have been able to address common challenges, explore new opportunities for collaboration, and deepen our friendship,” he said.

    The Deputy President also met with the Chairman of the State Duma, Vyacheslav Volodin. 

    The Deputy President expressed his appreciation for the ongoing collaboration between the State Duma and South Africa throughout the years. 

    He emphasised the significance of parliamentary diplomacy as a means to enhance government initiatives, promote dialogue, and facilitate progress in trade and other sectors.

    He concluded his trip with a guided tour and site visit to the Port of St. Petersburg, where he met with the port’s leadership and workers.
    This site visit followed discussions by officials from Russia and South Africa during the 18th Session of the Intergovernmental Committee on Trade and Economic Cooperation (ITEC). 

    During these talks, the two countries finalised their cooperation in the maritime sector and agreed to collaborate with participants from the logistics industry and port authorities of both nations to ensure the mutually beneficial use of port infrastructure.

    Deputy President Mashatile also had the opportunity to sit down with two major Russian television news networks, Russia Today and Sputnik Africa, where he reflected on some important insights from his working visit. 

    Key takeaways included a strong emphasis on enhancing economic cooperation in various sectors such as agriculture, automotive, energy, mining, and collaboration in science and technology. – SAnews.gov.za

    Gabisile

    MIL OSI Africa

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Tech innovators backed to set up and scale up in Britain through Industrial Strategy

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments 2

    Press release

    Tech innovators backed to set up and scale up in Britain through Industrial Strategy

    Ambitious Digital and Technologies Sector Plan to help deliver government’s modern Industrial Strategy to drive national renewal and our Plan for Change.

    • Ambitious Digital and Technologies Sector Plan to help deliver government’s modern Industrial Strategy to drive national renewal and our Plan for Change
    • £670 million in investment to accelerate impact of quantum computers from energy to healthcare
    • Engineering biology researchers in line for £380 million to advance cutting-edge research such as in life-saving medicines and sustainable food

    Innovators driving future technologies like quantum computers to deliver new life-saving medicines and semiconductors powering the next generation of mobile phones are being backed by well over £1 billion to set up and scale up their businesses in Britain, Science and Technology Secretary Peter Kyle has announced.

    Investment will include landmark funding for the UK’s mission to develop quantum computers that could unearth game-changing discoveries for our health and environment, the establishment of a new national semiconductor centre laser-focused on helping firms to scale-up, and new backing for engineering biology researchers working on everything from new vaccines to eco-friendly fuels.

    The package will drive the Digital and Technologies Sector Plan within our modern Industrial Strategy published today (Monday 23 June), a pivotal moment in the government’s agenda for national renewal and in supporting our mission as part of the Plan for Change to deliver the highest sustained economic growth in the G7.

    To ensure the UK is in pole position to make the most of quantum computing’s potential to improve our everyday lives, £670 million will be dedicated to accelerating the application of this revolutionary technology.

    It makes the National Quantum Computing Centre one of the first organisations to receive a 10-year funding settlement, providing long-term certainty to researchers that marks Britain as the place to do business when it comes to cutting edge tech.

    By 2035, the UK aims to develop quantum computers capable of outperforming conventional supercomputers, potentially meaning new drugs for incurable diseases or better carbon capture technologies, supporting our missions of building an NHS that is fit for the future and making Britain a green clean energy superpower as part of the plan for change.

    Science and Technology Secretary, Peter Kyle, said:

    Britain is full of ambitious risk-takers driven by a desire to innovate and improve people’s everyday lives. It is on us in government to match that boldness by investing in our country’s immense potential and embracing businesses who can drive that change and grow our economy.

    From quantum computers that could revolutionise drug discovery and make the NHS fit for the future, to sustainable fuels that can make the UK a clean energy superpower, science and technology has a key part to play in delivering our modern Industrial Strategy to renew our country and support our Plan for Change.

    In engineering biology, a £380 million investment will support researchers working on everything from new life-saving medicines to cell-cultivated meats and climate-resilient crops, to protect our environment and strengthen food security.

    Of this, £184 million will help bridge the gap between laboratory discoveries and commercial applications through infrastructure supporting innovators to scale up. The remaining £196 million will be invested in research and development through the National Engineering Biology Programme, bolstering the UK’s significant strengths in this field.

    Further initial investment includes:

    The commitment of £54 million to bring the world’s top science and tech talent to the UK. As the UK competes for the highest skilled individuals in priority industries, the launch of the government’s Global Talent Taskforce signals a greater focus on targeting and attracting the brightest and best talent to supercharge growth.

    A new UK Semiconductor Centre, backed by up to £19 million, will serve as a single point of contact for global firms and governments to engage with the UK semiconductor sector, helping our ambitious firms to scale-up, form new partnerships and strengthen the UK’s role in global supply chains – benefiting us all in helping to grow the economy.

    £35 million to scale up the recently announced Semiconductor Talent Expansion Programme – including new chip design courses for students, bursaries, schools outreach, and a proposed master’s conversion course to help more people move into the sector.

    £370 million for cutting-edge, UK-developed technologies to deliver advanced connectivity improving coverage for communities, providing connectivity across transport networks, and supporting defence applications – like drones.

    It includes a £240 million Advanced Connectivity Tech R&D programme, and a further £130 million will go towards strengthening the capabilities of the UK Telecoms Lab, enhancing the security and reliability of our networks.

    Building on a successful round of semiconductor Innovation and Knowledge Centres launched earlier this year, the government is providing funding for 2 additional centres, backed by £25 million.

    £10 million to expand Cyber ASAP supporting 25 academic teams annually, plus £2 million for Belfast’s Cyber AI Hub, aiming to support 28 academic spinouts by 2030.

    £6 million to extend Cyber Runway accelerator, supporting 60 startups annually with mentoring, skills development and networking to improve survival rates and growth.

    £24 million to promote CHERI blueprint adoption for designing secure next-generation chips.

    Find the full modern Industrial Strategy here.

    Notes to editors

    Further funding set out in the strategy includes:

    • Up to £330 million investment through the National Security Strategic Investment Fund for UK security and defence capabilities, plus a second year of the Science and Technology Venture Capital Fellowship to support digital and technology investments.
    • The Sector Plan also highlights AI as a frontier technology, following £2 billion committed at the Spending Review to implement the AI Opportunities Action Plan. The investment reaffirms the government’s commitment to deliver all 50 recommendations outlined in the Plan and underpins the Industrial Strategy’s approach to prioritise frontier technologies with the greatest growth potential.

    DSIT media enquiries

    Email press@dsit.gov.uk

    Monday to Friday, 8:30am to 6pm 020 7215 3000

    Updates to this page

    Published 23 June 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: 21 June 2025 Departmental update WHO publishes 54 pathogen background documents to support safe water and sanitation systems

    Source: World Health Organisation

    In a move to strengthen global efforts against waterborne disease, WHO has released 54 WASH-related pathogens new technical background documents — announced yesterday at a global water microbiology conference in the Netherlands — that capture the latest science on pathogens linked to drinking-water and sanitation systems.

    Unsafe water, inadequate sanitation and poor hygiene (WASH) continue to expose billions of people to harmful pathogens every day. These systemic failures are responsible for more than 1.4 million preventable deaths each year, disproportionately affecting young children.

    The newly published documents offer a detailed overview of pathogens that pose a risk through water, sanitation, or both. WHO has included documents for several pathogens not traditionally considered waterborne, but for which questions have been raised about possible transmission through drinking-water.

    Each background document provides a concise summary of the current science. This includes information on human health impacts, disease patterns, modes of transmission, and sources of faecal contamination. The profiles also detail how these pathogens occur in the environment – including in various parts of the water cycle – and how they are detected, prevented, and managed within drinking-water and sanitation systems.

    The technical package also features a list of the top 10 water- and sanitation-related pathogens, developed to spotlight priority threats, raise awareness and support clear communication of the evidence and actions outlined in the background documents. Well-managed sanitation and drinking-water systems will effectively control WASH-related pathogens, including these top 10.

    This summary, along with the background documents, is being launched at WaterMicro25, the 22nd Health Related Water Microbiology Conference today, in the Netherlands.  Based on burden of disease data, evidence of WASH transmission and concerns such as antimicrobial resistance, the Top 10 pathogens include diarrhoea genic and enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coliVibrio choleraeSalmonella spp., ShigellaCampylobacterCryptosporidium, rotavirus, norovirus, adenovirus and hepatitis A.

    “We know what’s making people sick and we know how to stop it,” said Bruce Gordon, Head of WHO’s Water, Sanitation, Hygiene and Health Unit. “Safe drinking-water, sanitation systems and strong regulations are the foundation for public health – yet millions still lack access to them. A key is for all countries to work within their means and make gradual improvements within their systems to stop these pathogens.”

    A global problem, a preventable burden
    Many of these pathogens are transmitted not just through drinking-water, but also through contaminated food, hands and the environment. Poorly managed sanitation systems, unreliable water supply and exposure to animal waste all contribute to transmission.

    Although vaccines exist for some of these diseases – including cholera, rotavirus, typhoid and hepatitis A – most remain preventable only through long-term WASH investments, such as:

    “Effective WASH, which can stop all pathogens, is an essential complement to vaccination,” said Dr Sophie Boisson, Lead Epidemiologist in WHO’s Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Unit. “Effective WASH provides the multiple barriers that stop transmission of over 50 waterborne pathogens – viruses, bacteria and protozoan parasites.”

    WHO’s call to action
    The background documents are supporting information for WHO’s Guidelines on sanitation and health and/or the Guidelines for drinking-water quality. They are intended to help public health practitioners assess and manage risks in water and sanitation systems more effectively.  WHO supports countries to develop WASH standards, build workforce capacity and monitor progress through global efforts such as the WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (JMP) and the UN-Water Global Analysis and Assessment of Sanitation and Drinking-Water (GLAAS).

    By identifying the pathogens that matter most – and the systems that can stop them – WHO aims to strengthen disease prevention from the ground up.

    “It’s time to align public health strategies with water and sanitation realities,” added Boisson. “Without addressing the root causes of pathogen transmission, we will keep responding to outbreaks rather than preventing them.”

    MIL OSI United Nations News

  • MIL-OSI Global: The US has entered the Israel-Iran war. Here are 3 scenarios for what might happen next

    Source: The Conversation – Global Perspectives – By Ian Parmeter, Research Scholar, Middle East Studies, Australian National University

    After prevaricating about whether the United States would enter Israel’s war on Iran, President Donald Trump finally made a decision.

    Early Sunday, US warplanes and submarines struck three of Iran’s nuclear sites at Natanz, Isfahan and Fordow, where the Iranians have a uranium enrichment plant buried about 80 metres beneath a mountain.

    These strikes have to be viewed as part of an overall continuum that began with the Gaza war following Hamas’ attack on Israel on October 7, 2023, and then continued with Israel’s attacks on Hezbollah (the Iran-backed militant group in Lebanon) and the fall of the Iran-backed Assad regime in Syria.

    Iran has never been weaker than it is now. And when Trump said it may take two weeks for him to decide whether to bomb Iran, the Israelis likely pushed him to act sooner.

    We can assume there was a lot of Israeli pressure on Trump to use the massive ordnance penetrators, the 30,000-pound (13,600-kilogram) “bunker buster” bombs that only the US can deploy with its B2 bombers.

    Now that Trump has taken the significant step of entering the US in yet another Middle East war, where could things go from here? There are a few possible scenarios.

    Iran strikes back

    The Iranians know they don’t have the strength to take on the US, and that the Americans can do enormous damage to their country and even put the Iranian regime’s stability at risk.

    This is always the prime consideration of the clerical regime led by Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei – everything else is subordinate to that.

    To gauge Iran’s possible reaction, we can look at the how it responded to the first Trump administration’s assassination of the head of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps’ elite Quds Force, Qassem Soleimani, in January 2020.

    Iran said there would be a major reaction, but all it did was launch a barrage of missiles at two American bases in Iraq, which caused no US fatalities and very little damage. After that token retaliation, Iran said the matter was closed.

    Iran’s reaction to the new US strikes will likely be along these lines. It probably won’t want to get into a tit-for-tat with the US by launching attacks against American facilities in the region. Trump has promised to respond with force:

    Iran, a bully of the Middle East, must now make peace. If they do not, future attacks will be far greater and a lot easier.

    It’s also unclear how long Iran will be able to prosecute this war. This depends largely on how many ballistic missiles and launchers it has left.

    There are various estimates as to how many ballistic missiles Iran may have remaining in its stockpiles. It was believed to have about 2,000 missiles capable of reaching Israel at the start of the war. Some estimates say Iran has fired 700 of them; others say around 400. Whatever the number is, its stockpiles are dwindling quickly.

    Israel has also destroyed about a third of Iran’s ballistic missile launchers. If Israel is able to destroy all of them, Iran would have very limited ability to fight back.

    Iran backs down

    Before the US got involved in the conflict, Iran said it was prepared to negotiate, but it wouldn’t do so while Israel was still attacking.

    So, one scenario is that some sort of compromise can now be worked out, in which Israel announces a ceasefire and Iran and the US agree to resume negotiations on Tehran’s nuclear program.

    The big problem is that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said he doesn’t trust the negotiating process and he doesn’t want to stop Israel’s military actions until all of Iran’s nuclear facilities have been completely destroyed. He’s also been bombing Iran’s oil terminals and gas facilities to put even more pressure on the regime.

    But the regime has shown itself to be incredibly determined not to lose face. It was under great pressure at different times during the Iran-Iraq war in the 1980s and never considered surrendering until a US missile mistakenly took down an Iranian passenger jet, killing 290 people.

    Iran then agreed to a UN-brokered ceasefire. But the Iran-Iraq war lasted eight years, causing an estimated one million deaths. And when the then-supreme leader, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, agreed to the ceasefire, he said it was “worse than drinking poison”.

    Given the state of Iran’s military capabilities, Khamenei, the current supreme leader, might surrender simply to try to preserve the regime. But this would be quite a climbdown as far as he’s concerned, and he has been very obstinate in the past.

    The regime is very unpopular, but the Iranian people, in my experience, are strongly patriotic – loyal to their country, if not the regime. Though it’s difficult to gauge opinion in a country of 90 million people, a lot of Iranians would not want to be ordered to do anything by the US or Israel, and would rather fight on.

    Netanyahu has said he wants to create the conditions for the Iranian people to rise up against the regime.

    But it’s worth bearing in mind that the opposite of autocracy is not necessarily democracy. It could possibly be chaos. Iran has a number of different ethnic groups and there may be huge disagreements over what should take the place of the clerical regime, were it to fall.

    At this stage, the regime will probably be able to hold together. And even if Khameini were to die suddenly, the regime will likely be able to quickly replace him.

    Though we don’t know his probable successor, the regime has had plenty of time to plan for this. Those in senior positions will also know that a post-Khamenei succession struggle really would put the regime at risk.

    The US engagement is limited

    According to the new polling by The Economist and YouGov, released on June 17, 60% of Americans were opposed to joining the conflict between Israel and Iran, with just 16% in favour. Among Republicans, 53% opposed military action.

    So, these strikes were not an obviously popular move among Americans at this stage. However, if this is an isolated event and succeeds in bringing a swift end to the war, Trump will probably be applauded by a majority of Americans.

    If the US has to go back with more bombers – or there are serious attacks on US interests in the region – there could be more adverse reactions among Americans.

    Another question is whether Iran’s 400 kilograms of 60% enriched uranium have been destroyed in the US attack.

    If it hasn’t been destroyed, and depending how much damage has been done to its centrifuges, Iran may be able to reconstruct its nuclear program relatively quickly. And it could have more incentive to further enrich this uranium to 90% purity, or weapons-grade level, to build a nuclear device.

    Ian Parmeter does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. The US has entered the Israel-Iran war. Here are 3 scenarios for what might happen next – https://theconversation.com/the-us-has-entered-the-israel-iran-war-here-are-3-scenarios-for-what-might-happen-next-259509

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-Evening Report: The US has entered the Israel-Iran war. Here are 3 scenarios for what might happen next

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Ian Parmeter, Research Scholar, Middle East Studies, Australian National University

    After prevaricating about whether the United States would enter Israel’s war on Iran, President Donald Trump finally made a decision.

    Early Sunday, US warplanes struck three of Iran’s nuclear sites at Natanz, Isfahan and Fordow, where the Iranians have a uranium enrichment plant buried about 80 metres beneath a mountain.

    These strikes have to be viewed as part of an overall continuum that began with the Gaza war following Hamas’ attack on Israel on October 7, 2023, and then continued with Israel’s attacks on Hezbollah (the Iran-backed militant group in Lebanon) and the fall of the Iran-backed Assad regime in Syria.

    Iran has never been weaker than it is now. And when Trump said it may take two weeks for him to decide whether to bomb Iran, the Israelis likely pushed him to act sooner.

    We can assume there was a lot of Israeli pressure on Trump to use the massive ordnance penetrators, the 30,000-pound (13,600-kilogram) “bunker buster” bombs that only the US can deploy with its B2 bombers.

    Now that Trump has taken the significant step of entering the US in yet another Middle East war, where could things go from here? There are a few possible scenarios.

    Iran strikes back

    The Iranians know they don’t have the strength to take on the US, and that the Americans can do enormous damage to their country and even put the Iranian regime’s stability at risk.

    This is always the prime consideration of of the clerical regime led by Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei – everything else is subordinate to that.

    To gauge Iran’s possible reaction, we can look at the how it responded to the first Trump administration’s assassination of the head of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps’ elite Quds Force, Qassem Soleimani, in January 2020.

    Iran said there would be a major reaction, but all it did was launch a barrage of missiles at two American bases in Iraq, which caused no US fatalities and very little damage. After that token retaliation, Iran said the matter was closed.

    Iran’s reaction to the new US strikes will likely be along these lines. It probably won’t want to get into a tit-for-tat with the US by launching attacks against American facilities in the region. Trump has promised to respond with force:

    Iran, a bully of the Middle East, must now make peace. If they do not, future attacks will be far greater and a lot easier.

    It’s also unclear how long Iran will be able to prosecute this war. This depends largely on how many ballistic missiles and launchers it has left.

    There are various estimates as to how many ballistic missiles Iran may have remaining in its stockpiles. It was believed to have about 2,000 missiles capable of reaching Israel at the start of the war. Some estimates say Iran has fired 700 of them; others say around 400. Whatever the number is, its stockpiles are dwindling quickly.

    Israel has also destroyed about a third of Iran’s ballistic missile launchers. If Israel is able to destroy all of them, Iran would have very limited ability to fight back.

    Iran backs down

    Before the US got involved in the conflict, Iran said it was prepared to negotiate, but it wouldn’t do so while Israel was still attacking.

    So, one scenario is that some sort of compromise can now be worked out, in which Israel announces a ceasefire and Iran and the US agree to resume negotiations on Tehran’s nuclear program.

    The big problem is that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said he doesn’t trust the negotiating process and he doesn’t want to stop Israel’s military actions until all of Iran’s nuclear facilities have been completely destroyed. He’s also been bombing Iran’s oil terminals and gas facilities to put even more pressure on the regime.

    But the regime has shown itself to be incredibly determined not to lose face. It was under great pressure at different times during the Iran-Iraq war in the 1980s and never considered surrendering until a US missile mistakenly took down an Iranian passenger jet, killing 290 people.

    Iran then agreed to a UN-brokered ceasefire. But the Iran-Iraq war lasted eight years, causing an estimated one million deaths. And when the then-supreme leader, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, agreed to the ceasefire, he said it was “worse than drinking poison”.

    Given the state of Iran’s military capabilities, Khamenei, the current supreme leader, might surrender simply to try to preserve the regime. But this would be quite a climbdown as far as he’s concerned, and he has been very obstinate in the past.

    The regime is very unpopular, but the Iranian people, in my experience, are strongly patriotic – loyal to their country, if not the regime. Though it’s difficult to gauge opinion in a country of 90 million people, a lot of Iranians would not want to be ordered to do anything by the US or Israel, and would rather fight on.

    Netanyahu has said he wants to create the conditions for the Iranian people to rise up against the regime.

    But it’s worth bearing in mind that the opposite of autocracy is not necessarily democracy. It could possibly be chaos. Iran has a number of different ethnic groups and there may be huge disagreements over what should take the place of the clerical regime, were it to fall.

    At this stage, the regime will probably be able to hold together. And even if Khameini were to die suddenly, the regime will likely be able to quickly replace him.

    Though we don’t know his probable successor, the regime has had plenty of time to plan for this. Those in senior positions will also know that a post-Khamenei succession struggle really would put the regime at risk.

    The US engagement is limited

    According to the new polling by The Economist and YouGov, released on June 17, 60% of Americans were opposed to joining the conflict between Israel and Iran, with just 16% in favour. Among Republicans, 53% opposed military action.

    So, these strikes were not an obviously popular move among Americans at this stage. However, if this is an isolated event and succeeds in bringing a swift end to the war, Trump will probably be applauded by a majority of Americans.

    If the US has to go back with more bombers – or there are serious attacks on US interests in the region – there could be more adverse reactions among Americans.

    Another question is whether Iran’s 400 kilograms of 60% enriched uranium have been destroyed in the US attack.

    If it hasn’t been destroyed, and depending how much damage has been done to its centrifuges, Iran may be able to reconstruct its nuclear program relatively quickly. And it could have more incentive to further enrich this uranium to 90% purity, or weapons-grade level, to build a nuclear device.

    Ian Parmeter does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. The US has entered the Israel-Iran war. Here are 3 scenarios for what might happen next – https://theconversation.com/the-us-has-entered-the-israel-iran-war-here-are-3-scenarios-for-what-might-happen-next-259509

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI: $HAREHOLDER ALERT: Class Action Attorney Juan Monteverde Investigates the Merger of CureVac N.V. (NASDAQ: CVAC)

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    NEW YORK, June 20, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Class Action Attorney Juan Monteverde with Monteverde & Associates PC (the “M&A Class Action Firm”), has recovered millions of dollars for shareholders and is recognized as a Top 50 Firm in the 2024 ISS Securities Class Action Services Report. The firm is headquartered at the Empire State Building in New York City and is investigating CureVac N.V. (NASDAQ: CVAC) related to its sale to BioNTech SE. Under the terms of the proposed transaction, each CureVac share will be exchanged for approximately $5.46 in BioNTech ADSs. Upon closing of the proposed transaction, CureVac shareholders are expected to own between 4% and 6% of BioNTech. Is it a fair deal?

    Click here for more info https://monteverdelaw.com/case/curevac-n-v/. It is free and there is no cost or obligation to you.

    NOT ALL LAW FIRMS ARE EQUAL. Before you hire a law firm, you should talk to a lawyer and ask:

    1. Do you file class actions and go to Court?
    2. When was the last time you recovered money for shareholders?
    3. What cases did you recover money in and how much?

    About Monteverde & Associates PC

    Our firm litigates and has recovered money for shareholders…and we do it from our offices in the Empire State Building. We are a national class action securities firm with a successful track record in trial and appellate courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court. 

    No one is above the law. If you own common stock in the above listed company and have concerns or wish to obtain additional information free of charge, please visit our website or contact Juan Monteverde, Esq. either via e-mail at jmonteverde@monteverdelaw.com or by telephone at (212) 971-1341.

    Contact:
    Juan Monteverde, Esq.
    MONTEVERDE & ASSOCIATES PC
    The Empire State Building
    350 Fifth Ave. Suite 4740
    New York, NY 10118
    United States of America
    jmonteverde@monteverdelaw.com
    Tel: (212) 971-1341

    Attorney Advertising. (C) 2025 Monteverde & Associates PC. The law firm responsible for this advertisement is Monteverde & Associates PC (www.monteverdelaw.com).  Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome with respect to any future matter.

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: $HAREHOLDER ALERT: Class Action Attorney Juan Monteverde Investigates the Merger of CureVac N.V. (NASDAQ: CVAC)

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    NEW YORK, June 20, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Class Action Attorney Juan Monteverde with Monteverde & Associates PC (the “M&A Class Action Firm”), has recovered millions of dollars for shareholders and is recognized as a Top 50 Firm in the 2024 ISS Securities Class Action Services Report. The firm is headquartered at the Empire State Building in New York City and is investigating CureVac N.V. (NASDAQ: CVAC) related to its sale to BioNTech SE. Under the terms of the proposed transaction, each CureVac share will be exchanged for approximately $5.46 in BioNTech ADSs. Upon closing of the proposed transaction, CureVac shareholders are expected to own between 4% and 6% of BioNTech. Is it a fair deal?

    Click here for more info https://monteverdelaw.com/case/curevac-n-v/. It is free and there is no cost or obligation to you.

    NOT ALL LAW FIRMS ARE EQUAL. Before you hire a law firm, you should talk to a lawyer and ask:

    1. Do you file class actions and go to Court?
    2. When was the last time you recovered money for shareholders?
    3. What cases did you recover money in and how much?

    About Monteverde & Associates PC

    Our firm litigates and has recovered money for shareholders…and we do it from our offices in the Empire State Building. We are a national class action securities firm with a successful track record in trial and appellate courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court. 

    No one is above the law. If you own common stock in the above listed company and have concerns or wish to obtain additional information free of charge, please visit our website or contact Juan Monteverde, Esq. either via e-mail at jmonteverde@monteverdelaw.com or by telephone at (212) 971-1341.

    Contact:
    Juan Monteverde, Esq.
    MONTEVERDE & ASSOCIATES PC
    The Empire State Building
    350 Fifth Ave. Suite 4740
    New York, NY 10118
    United States of America
    jmonteverde@monteverdelaw.com
    Tel: (212) 971-1341

    Attorney Advertising. (C) 2025 Monteverde & Associates PC. The law firm responsible for this advertisement is Monteverde & Associates PC (www.monteverdelaw.com).  Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome with respect to any future matter.

    The MIL Network

  • Amit Shah inaugurates Bengaluru campus of Adichunchanagiri University, hails blend of healthcare and education

    Source: Government of India

    Source: Government of India (4)

    Union Home Minister and Minister of Cooperation Amit Shah today inaugurated the Bengaluru campus of Adichunchanagiri University (ACU) in Karnataka, hailing it as a milestone in the pursuit of affordable healthcare and education for all.

    Speaking at the inauguration ceremony, Shah praised the efforts of the Adichunchanagiri Mutt in upholding the cultural ideal of “Sarva Jan Hitaya, Sarva Jan Sukhaya” — the welfare and happiness of all. He commended the Mutt’s initiatives in running health centres in rural areas, offering free medical treatment to the underprivileged, and setting up educational institutions for children.

    The newly inaugurated campus, constructed at a cost of ₹200 crore, spans 20 lakh square feet over 16 acres and is designed to accommodate 4,000 students. It houses a modern 1,000-bed hospital that offers comprehensive healthcare facilities, including free and affordable treatment for the poor. In his address, the Home Minister said this establishment would emerge as a true centre of service through its integration of education and healthcare.

    Shah paid tribute to Jagadguru Dr. Balagangadharanatha Swamiji for preserving and enhancing the 1,800-year-old spiritual heritage of the sacred Adichunchanagiri Hills by intertwining it with service and education. He also lauded the continued efforts of Dr. Nirmalanandanatha Mahaswamiji in carrying forward this legacy.

    He noted that the Mutt’s work has fostered a deep connection with thousands of families, especially from poor and middle-income backgrounds, by promoting spirituality and Karma Yoga through community service. The Mutt’s holistic outreach is based on nine key pillars — Anna (food), Akshara (education), Arogya (health), Adhyatmika (spirituality), Aashraya (shelter), Aranya (environment), Aakaalu (disaster relief), Anukampa (compassion), and Anubandh (social connection). According to Shah, this inclusive approach has significantly strengthened social unity and serves as a model for other religious and cultural institutions.

    Highlighting the university’s role in combining tradition with innovation, he emphasized its efforts in reconnecting the youth with India’s cultural roots while equipping them with cutting-edge education. He credited Mahaswami Ji with ensuring that students not only receive quality education but also free accommodation, giving them an opportunity to lead dignified lives. The university, he said, has become one of the country’s premier institutions, offering advanced medical care at low cost. The 1,500-bed hospital includes facilities for critical care, cardiology, neurosurgery, oncology, and complex transplants like kidney, liver, and cornea.

    Shah further highlighted the Modi Government’s commitment to healthcare reform. Recalling Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s earlier remarks that illness and its related expenses are among the leading causes of poverty, he stated that Modi’s vision had materialized through initiatives like the Ayushman Bharat scheme, which now provides free treatment of up to ₹5 lakh to 60 crore citizens.

    He elaborated on other major health and welfare initiatives launched under PM Modi’s leadership, including the construction of nearly 12 crore household toilets, the Fit India Movement, the celebration of International Day of Yoga, and the Mission Indradhanush vaccination campaign for children up to 15 years of age. He also mentioned the Poshan Abhiyan, which addresses maternal and child nutrition, and the Jan Aushadhi Yojana, through which essential medicines are available at just 20% of market prices at over 15,000 locations.

    In addition, Shah pointed to the dramatic expansion of medical education infrastructure in the country. Since 2014, the number of AIIMS institutions has increased from 7 to 23, medical colleges from 387 to 780, MBBS seats from 51,000 to 1,18,000, and postgraduate medical seats from 31,000 to 74,000.

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: CHP investigates local measles infection case

    Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

    CHP investigates local measles infection case 
    The case involves a 28-year-old female. She sought treatment from a private doctor on June 11 for fever, cough, runny nose and red eyes. She developed a skin rash on June 13 and attended the Accident and Emergency Department of Kwong Wah Hospital twice, once on the same day and again on the following day. She was admitted for treatment on June 14. Her blood sample tested positive for antibodies of measles virus upon laboratory testing. She remains hospitalised and is in stable condition.
     
    An epidemiological investigation revealed that the patient was uncertain whether she had received a measles vaccination. She had no travel history during the incubation period. Her six household contacts are currently asymptomatic. During the communicable period, the patient had visited the Kowloon City Baptist Church Kindergarten, located at 206 Argyle Street in Kowloon City. The CHP is conducting medical surveillance on approximately 170 staff members and students of the kindergarten concerned.

    As measles is highly infectious, the CHP will set up an enquiry hotline (2125 2372) for contact tracing of the case. The CHP appeals to those who visited the Kowloon City Baptist Church Kindergarten between 11.30am and 12.30pm on June 9 or 10 to call the hotline. Officers of the CHP will assess their conditions and offer health advice. The hotline will operate from 9am to 1pm tomorrow (June 21) and June 22, and from 9am to 5pm between June 23 and 27.
     
    The investigations are ongoing. 
    The number of measles cases in some overseas countries remains at a high level this year. The outbreaks in North America (including the United States and Canada), Europe and neighbouring areas (including Vietnam, Cambodia and the Philippines) are ongoing due to the relatively low vaccination rate. Furthermore, an increasing number of measles cases have also been recorded in Japan and Australia this year. For those who plan to travel to measles-endemic areas, they should check their vaccination records and medical history as early as possible. If they have not been diagnosed with measles through laboratory tests and have never received two doses of measles vaccine or are not sure if they have received a measles vaccine, they should consult a doctor at least two weeks prior to their trip for vaccination.
    ???
    Besides being vaccinated against measles, members of the public should take the following measures to prevent infection:
     For more information on measles, the public may visit the CHP’s measles thematic pageIssued at HKT 19:45

    NNNN

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: The challenges of vaccine production in Africa

    Source: Agenzia Fides – MIL OSI

    Thursday, 19 June 2025

    World Health Organization (WHO)

    by Cosimo GrazianiAbuja (Agenzia Fides) – In recent weeks, a Lassa fever vaccine developed by local researchers in Nigeria has shown initial signs of effectiveness in combating the disease, which recorded 747 new cases and 142 deaths in the African country in the first half of 2025. This was announced by Simeon Agwale, CEO of the Nigerian pharmaceutical company Innovative Biotech. The vaccine was developed under license from the University of Melbourne, and test doses were produced in the United States until the necessary infrastructure is established in Nigeria.For the African giant, the possibility of developing and producing this vaccine locally represents a significant achievement for the country, especially considering that the mortality rate has increased compared to 2024. This progress reflects a positive trend regarding the development of vaccines across the continent.Several African countries are striving to increase domestic vaccine production, a priority that has gained importance since the COVID-19 pandemic. In 2022, the Partnerships for African Vaccine Manufacturing (PAVM) initiative was launched, aiming to produce 60 percent of Africa’s vaccine needs by 2040 (currently just 1 percent).The challenge of vaccine manufacturing is also related to the planning and development phase.According to the Africa Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the African Union department that deals with disease prevention and control, in 2024 there were 25 vaccine projects across the continent: 15 in early stages of development, five with production capacity but no transfer capacity, and five with both production and transfer capacity. These figures are positive and are underpinned by the fact that there are at least a dozen active pharmaceutical companies across the continent in countries such as Nigeria, Morocco, Egypt, South Africa, and Algeria. All of these aspects contribute to strengthening the vaccine ecosystem, which has already borne fruit in the past, such as the Ebola vaccine developed after the 2013 outbreak in West Africa.Three major agreements to strengthen vaccine production capacity in Africa were recently announced, one signed in December 2024 and two in February of this year. The first involved the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation, the African Development Bank, and the International Finance Corporation (IFC). It provided $45 million to VaxSen, a subsidiary of the Dakar-based Pasteur Institute in Senegal, a country also very active in vaccine research. The agreement was intended to strengthen production capacity, support the local supply chain, and create a strong vaccine distribution network, as envisioned in the African Union’s 2040 Strategy, of which PAVM is a part. In addition to its impact on healthcare, the agreement should also have an impact on the creation of skilled jobs, as the Pasteur Institute’s facilities are being expanded. The question arises whether this project will also be scaled back or even canceled following the Trump administration’s cuts in international cooperation in recent months.The first of the agreements signed in February concerns a $1.2 billion investment by Gavi-the Vaccine Alliance, a public-private partnership that supports vaccination projects worldwide, particularly for children. According to this agreement, the funds will be used to establish an RNA vaccine production platform in Africa, involving both private African companies such as the Egyptian company EVA Pharma and foreign companies such as the French company DNA Script and the Belgian companies Unizima and Quantoom Biosciences. A second agreement signed in February, however, is a purely African collaboration: Egyptian Biogeneric Pharma and South African Afrigen will expand the development of RNA vaccines to also strengthen continental expertise in manufacturing and application to combat diseases plaguing the continent.These initiatives were listed in the report published by the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) in February this year. The Oslo-based foundation pointed out that among the issues that need to be resolved to develop a self-sufficient vaccine industry in Africa are problems with access to finance, production restrictions, tariffs, and customs duties and uncertain demand. The problem of the vaccine market in Africa has a major impact on the decisions of various vaccine companies around the world, also taking into account the fact that Africa’s population, especially its young population, will continue to grow strongly in the coming years. (Agenzia Fides, 19/6/2025)
    Share:

    MIL OSI Europe News