Category: Covid 19

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Councillors asked to endorse new ‘social contract’ to eradicate poverty

    Source: Scotland – City of Perth

    Despite being a relatively affluent area, Perth and Kinross has around 30,000 people living below the poverty line, with approximately 27,200 in deep or very deep poverty.

    Tackling poverty is one of the Council’s main priorities and the local authority helped establish the Anti-Poverty Taskforce jointly chaired by the Chief Executives of PKAVS and Giraffe to address poverty across Perth and Kinross. The Taskforce brings together a range of partners, including the Council, to work together on addressing poverty.

    Councillors will also discuss the sixth Annual Child Poverty Action report, which reveals there are still 5,750 children living in poverty in Perth and Kinross and sets out the actions that are being taken to reduce this number.

    Council leader Councillor Grant Laing said: “Many people view Perth and Kinross as an affluent area but the truth is poverty is a real and growing problem for many of our residents.

    “The Covid-19 pandemic and the cost-of-living crisis have both contributed to a situation that requires dedicated and co-ordinated action to solve.

    “For those living in poverty every day is a struggle and things that are an inconvenience to many of us – an unexpected bill or a spell of cold weather – can lead to a crisis for those on or close to the breadline. It is vitally important we support those people who find themselves in poverty.

    “Those living in rural areas, as many do in Perth and Kinross, also face additional challenges regarding employment, housing, transport and more.”

    Councillor Laing added: “The actions we are taking are showing results – there are now around 200 fewer children living in poverty now than there were last year. But that still leaves nearly 6,000 in poverty.”

    The social contract sets out four key principles that will guide the Council, and its partners, as they strive to lift residents out of poverty.

    These are:

    • No one should be in deep poverty: 
    • Those unable to work should not be in poverty: 
    • People should try to increase their earnings: 
    • Low earners should not be in poverty: Commitment to Collaboration:

    As part of these efforts, the Council is being asked to renew its commitment to collaborating with community partners, the third sector, and local communities to secure extra resources and support for those in deep poverty and provide addition resources for those unable to work due to health, disability or caregiving responsibilities.

    It is also being asked to support job seekers and those wanting to work more hours and help those on low incomes to achieve a better standard of living.

    Shaheena Din, joint chair of the Anti-Poverty Taskforce said: “Change happens when we come together.

    “By working as one, we can make a real difference in lifting people out of poverty, because no one person or organisation can tackle this challenge alone.”

    She added the Anti-Poverty Taskforce supports a range of people who are struggling to make ends meet. These include:

    • People facing ongoing hardship: Those on low incomes, whether they are receiving benefits or not, and may not be getting the support they’re entitled to.
    • People in deep poverty: Including single individuals without children, people from ethnic minorities, and households where someone has a disability.
    •  Those on or just below the poverty line: those struggling to make ends meet.
    •  People just getting by: managing on their own but often have little or no money left at the end of the month.
    •  Asset rich but cash poor: Homeowners with limited savings and financial assets that are hard to access and facing hardship.

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI USA: California Company Charged with Conspiring to Sell Misbranded N95 Masks to Hospital in Early Months of COVID-19 Pandemic

    Source: US Department of Health and Human Services – 3

    Department of Justice
    U.S. Attorney’s Office
    District of Massachusetts 

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
    October 29, 2024

    This is the second company charged in connection with the scheme; three individuals also charged with misbranding N95 masks

    BOSTON – A California company, and three individuals who owned and managed the company, have been charged and have agreed to plead guilty to charges relating to the shipment of facemasks that were misbranded as N95 respirators during the earliest phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States.  

    Advoque Safeguard LLC (ASG) was charged with one count of conspiracy to introduce misbranded devices into interstate commerce with intent to defraud or mislead, in violation of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. Jason Azevedo, 33, of Cedar Creek, Texas; Paul Shrater, 51, of Simi Valley, Calif.; and Andrew Stack, 52, of Santa Cruz, Calif., were charged with one count of introduction of misbranded devices into interstate commerce. Plea hearings have not yet been scheduled by the Court.  

    Earlier this month, a second company, JDM Supply LLC (JDM), and two individuals, Daniel Motha and Jeffrey Motha, were charged and agreed to plead guilty in connection with this investigation. In addition, in August 2023, another individual, Jason Colantuoni, pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit price gouging.  

    According to the charging documents, in the spring of 2020, during the earliest phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States, ASG and JDM conspired to ship facemasks that were misbranded as National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)-approved, N95 respirators. It is alleged that one hospital, identified as “HOSPITAL 1,” accepted and paid for hundreds of thousands of purported N95 masks that were manufactured by ASG and sold to HOSPITAL 1 by JDM.  (HOSPITAL 1 did not use the masks, which were eventually returned to ASG.) It is further alleged that ASG and JDM misled the hospital into believing that the ASG masks were NIOSH-approved N95s, when in fact they were not. In August 2020, a NIOSH lab tested a sample of the ASG masks that had been shipped to HOSPITAL 1. All 10 ASG masks tested between 83.94% and 93.24% filtration efficiency, and thus fell under the 95% minimum level of filtration efficiency required for N95 respirators.  

    The charge of conspiracy to introduce or deliver for introduction into interstate commerce a misbranded device with intent to defraud or mislead provides for a fine of $500,000 or twice the pecuniary gain or loss of the offense, whichever is greater and up to five years of probation.  The charge of introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate commerce a misbranded device provides for a sentence of up to one year in prison; up to one year of supervised release; and a fine of $100,000. Sentences are imposed by a federal judge based upon the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and statutes which govern the determination of a sentence in a criminal case.

    Acting United States Attorney Joshua S. Levy; Ketty Larco-Ward, Inspector in Charge of the U.S. Postal Inspection Service, Boston Division; Fernando McMillan, Special Agent in Charge of the Food and Drug Administration, Office of Criminal Investigations; Christopher Algieri, Special Agent in Charge of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Inspector General, Northeast Field Office; Jodi Cohen, Special Agent in Charge of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Boston Division; and Michael J. Krol, Acting Special Agent in Charge of Homeland Security Investigations in New England made the announcement today. Assistant U.S. Attorneys Bill Brady and Howard Locker of the Health Care Fraud Unit are prosecuting the case.

    On May 17, 2021, the Attorney General established the COVID-19 Fraud Enforcement Task Force to marshal the resources of the Department of Justice in partnership with agencies across government to enhance efforts to combat and prevent pandemic-related fraud. The Task Force bolsters efforts to investigate and prosecute the most culpable domestic and international criminal actors and assists agencies tasked with administering relief programs to prevent fraud by augmenting and incorporating existing coordination mechanisms, identifying resources and techniques to uncover fraudulent actors and their schemes, and sharing and harnessing information and insights gained from prior enforcement efforts. For more information on the department’s response to the pandemic, please visit https://www.justice.gov/coronavirus and https://www.justice.gov/coronavirus/combatingfraud. 
        
    Anyone with information about allegations of attempted fraud involving COVID-19 can report it by calling the Department of Justice’s National Center for Disaster Fraud Hotline via the NCDF Web Complaint Form.

    The details contained in the charging documents are allegations. The defendants are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.
     

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-Evening Report: Australia’s COVID inquiry shows why a permanent ‘centre for disease control’ is more urgent than ever

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Jocelyne Basseal, Associate Director, Sydney Infectious Diseases Institute (Sydney ID), Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney

    Christie Cooper/Shutterstock

    The long-awaited independent inquiry into Australia’s COVID response was released today, with lessons on how the nation could better prepare for future pandemics.

    The 868-page report outlined nine guiding recommendations and 26 actions, including 19 set for implementation over the next 12 to 18 months. These form the foundation for future pandemic preparedness.

    With initial strong national solidarity, Australia acted quickly to close national borders, the inquiry found. This bought crucial time, but Australia was not adequately prepared for a crisis of the scale of the COVID pandemic.

    Australia’s response lacked strong central co-ordination and leadership. Communication about public health advice was often conflicting or not appropriately communicated with the most vulnerable groups. Public trust was further undermined by a lack of transparency in decision-making, such as disease modelling, which underpinned important public health responses.

    In hindsight, the inquiry concluded a fully fledged Australian Centre for Disease Control (CDC) could have made a huge difference. In response, the federal government today committed A$251 milion to establish such a centre in Canberra.

    What did the inquiry find?

    1. Early rapid response and consensus helped keep us safe. As an inland nation, Australia was able to close its borders while preparing for the ultimate inevitable population-wide spread of SARS CoV-2. But it was unprepared for pandemic-related quarantines.

    2. Initially, the communication was clear and consistent. This didn’t last. Huge uncertainties, rapidly changing circumstances, differing opinions among experts and the politicisation of the response undermined communication strategies. Communication with diverse ethnic groups and vulnerable populations groups were often sub-optimal. In future, misinformation and disinformation needs to be addressed through improving health literacy and proactive communication.

    3. Our health-care infrastructure was lacking and couldn’t cope with emergency surge capacity, the inquiry found, although health-care workers “pulled together” remarkably. Aged care facilities were particularly vulnerable and had poor infection-control practices. More broadly, there were supply chain issues and inadequate stockpiles of essential infection prevention and control equipment, such as masks and gloves. Australia was unable to manufacture these and was left at the mercy of foreign providers.

    4. Analysing the genetic material of the virus and widespread testing were critical to tracking viral evolution and spread. Pathogen genomics in New South Wales and Victoria, for instance, allowed accurate tracking of virus variants and local transmission. But there was poor exchange of data between jurisdictions and limited national coordination to optimise data interpretation and response.

    5. Transparent, evidence-based decision-making was lacking. Disease models that informed key decisions were opaque and not open to scrutiny or peer review.

    6. Vulnerable populations, including children, suffered disproportionately. COVID-related school closures were particularly harmful as they affected learning, socialising and development, and disproportionately affected children from lower socioeconomic backgrounds. Strict social isolation also increased the risk of family violence, along with anxiety and other mental health impacts. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people experienced higher risks due to the inequity of service provision and the social determinants of health.

    7. Research is important and should be rapidly scalable. Good surveillance systems for emerging infectious diseases and future pandemic threats should be in place. Patient specimens need to be stored so we can rapidly explore the mechanisms of disease and develop essential diagnostic tests. The inquiry recognised the need for Australia to develop its own vaccines and for access to mRNA technology was recognised as an important health security measure, given challenges in vaccine access.

    8. Global solidarity and co-operation create a safer word for all.
    The stark inequities in COVID vaccine access, opened major fault lines in international relationships and still complicate the drafting of a global pandemic treaty.

    9. Emerging diseases with a One Health focus should be recognised as a ‘standing threat’. In our modern interconnected world, with highly concentrated human and animal populations combined with stressed ecosystems, new diseases with pandemic potential will continue to emerge at an unprecedented rate. This requires a gobal focus.

    How could a CDC make a difference?

    One of the inquiry’s key take-home messages is that the lack of strong, independent, central co-ordination hampered our pandemic response.

    The inadequate flow of data between jurisdictions were major shortcomings that limited the ability to target responses. This is needed to understand:

    • transmission dynamics
    • the vulnerabilities in those with severe disease
    • the circulating viral variants.

    The inquiry also emphasised the need to analyse data in near real time.

    Good data drive evidence-informed and transparent policy. This is a crucial area for a future Australian CDC to address. The CDC will function as a “data hub”, with Canberra offering the ideal location supporting a multi-jurisdictional “hub-and-spoke” model.

    Australia’s new CDC is expected to be launched by January 2026, pending legislation approval. The ongoing challenge will be to ensure it delivers optimal long-term health benefits for all Australians.

    The authors do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Australia’s COVID inquiry shows why a permanent ‘centre for disease control’ is more urgent than ever – https://theconversation.com/australias-covid-inquiry-shows-why-a-permanent-centre-for-disease-control-is-more-urgent-than-ever-239498

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Virgin Media O2 and Jangala help Coventry people connect

    Source: City of Coventry

    Virgin Media O2 has helped thousands of people affected by data poverty get online with free WiFi through its partnership with technology charity, Jangala.

    Virgin Media O2 and Jangala have reached a milestone of providing more than 1,000 internet-enabling ‘Get Boxes’ to charities and local authorities across the UK. The organisations are committed to rolling out 5,000 Get Boxes by April 2025.

    A Get Box is a book size device which can be plugged in to provide an instant and secure WiFi network, powered by free O2 mobile data, ensuring that those in need can stay connected.

    The O2 mobile data is provided by the National Databank, founded by Virgin Media O2 and charity, Good Things Foundation, which is like a foodbank but provides free O2 data, texts and calls to those who need it.

    It forms part of Virgin Media O2’s sustainability strategy, the Better Connections Plan, and the company’s goal to connect one million digitally excluded people through free and affordable connectivity and services.

    Free, fast and secure WiFi

    Get Boxes are helping low-income families and people who would otherwise be disconnected get online via free fast and reliable WiFi.  Those already benefiting include people who are unemployed, the elderly, those who are living in temporary accommodation and refuges.

    It means they can access essential services, such as applying for work, booking medical appointments, or building their skills via online training courses, and is helping them stay connected to loved ones.

    The devices, which can connect up to 20 people at time, have been distributed by local authorities, including Coventry City Council, and the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, as well as charities such as digital inclusion charity, AbilityNet, and Roundabout, a youth housing charity providing shelter, support and life skills to young people aged 16-25 who are homeless or at risk of homelessness.

    Coventry City Council has received hundreds of Get Boxes to help vulnerable residents living in temporary accommodation get online.

    The council has partnered with organisations such as Valley House and the Salvation Army, and distributed the devices to places such as hostels and houses across the city.

    Cllr Richard Brown, Cabinet Member for Strategic Finance and Resources at Coventry City Council, said:

    “All aspects of our lives are increasingly heading online. Employment opportunities, public services and everyday tasks rely on the Internet more than ever.  That’s why we are working so hard to reduce the digital divide in our city.

    “Having such supportive, committed partners like Virgin Media O2 and Jangala has been essential to the continued success of that work.

    “These Get Boxes are really fantastic pieces of kit and the feedback we’re getting from residents is excellent.”

    Grace*, who has been using a Get Box to get online, said:

    “I was very happy. Like this, I can speak more with my family. I have not seen them for one year. I cried with happiness when I got the box.”

    Nicola Green, Chief Communications and Corporate Affairs Officer at Virgin Media O2, said:

    “Virgin Media O2 is proud to be leading the way in helping those in need to get online.

    “Our partnership with Jangala is providing a lifeline to thousands of people who otherwise would be disconnected, giving them access to the online world so they can do everything from booking medical appointments to accessing digital skills training, or simply staying in touch with loved ones.

    “It builds on the measures Virgin Media O2 is taking to tackle data poverty. Whether it’s free O2 data from the National Databank, rehoming devices and data with people who need them via Community Calling, or offering reduced broadband and mobile plans for people receiving benefits, we’re committed to helping people in need stay connected.”

    Rich Thanki, Managing Director at Jangala, said:

    “Jangala is very proud to be partnering with Virgin Media O2 to help connect thousands of people across the UK who have faced digital exclusion, helping people access important services, communication with family and friends and all that Internet access brings.

    “Our low-cost and open source Get Box, designed at the outset of the Covid lockdown, and our work with Virgin Media O2, the National Databank, local councils and groups across the UK, is a great demonstration of the power of collaborative tech for good”

    Organisations can apply for Get Boxes by visiting Jangala’s website.

    Virgin Media O2 also supports Jangala’s global Emergency Response programme, where the company provides funding and O2 data for Jangala’s award-winning Big Boxes. Big Boxes are deployed during global humanitarian crises, enabling disaster response teams and communities to access WiFi.

    On top of this, Virgin Media O2 has also rehomed 20,000 smartphones with people who need them as part of its Community Calling initiative with environmental charity, Hubbub.

    *Name has been changed.

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: PM speech in Birmingham: 28 October 2024

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Prime Minister Keir Starmer makes a speech in Birmingham.

    It’s always great to be here in Birmingham. A city that is at the heart, not just of our country but also – our plans for growth – as we announced two weeks ago £500m worth of new investment in battery storage will create the jobs of the future right here. And that’s a snapshot of the Britain we are building this week and beyond. 

    Our economy – stabilised. 

    The foundations – fixed. 

    Hope in the future – restored.  

    Another step taken on the long, difficult, but resolute path that we will walk.

    Towards a Britain returned to the service of working people.

    I said on the steps of Downing Street – the day after the election that this would be a government for the working people of this country. 

    That, when the cameras stopped rolling. When that black door closed. We would carry their hopes and aspirations with us. 

    That the basic, completely reasonable desire to want a better future for your family. That would become the driving purpose of this Government. 

    Now, I will never stand here and tell you to feel better, if you don’t. And I will never ask you to feel grateful for what you should expect as a given.  

    Trust in my project to return Britain to the service of working people can only be earned through actions not words: Change must be felt. 

    But every decision we have made. Every decision that we will make in the future will be made with working people in our minds’ eye. People who have been working harder and harder for years, just to stand still. 

    People doing the right thing maybe still finding a little bit of money to put away. Paying their way – even in the cost-of-living crisis but who feel this country no longer gives them or their children a fair chance. 

    People stuck on an NHS waiting list whose town centre is blighted by anti-social behaviour who can’t afford to buy a place they call home or can’t afford the home they have, because of the mortgage bombshell. 

    And people who feel ignored as their lives, no matter how hard they work slide into greater insecurity. Scared of the postman coming down the path – will it be another bill I can’t afford?

    People like that video, we just watched. [Political content removed]

    I know some people want to have a debate about this and I know there will always be the exception that proves the rule. Welcome to the wonders of a diverse country!  

    But I also know that the working people of this country know exactly who they are and that – they are the golden thread that runs through our agenda. Every single one of our national missions is about delivering for them. 

    And we are getting on with the job. That’s why we reformed planning rules to get Britain building again – restore the dream of home ownership.  

    It’s why we ended junior doctor strikes to lift the pressure on our NHS. Start cutting waiting lists. 

    It’s why we stopped the riots with tough sentences for violent thugs. 

    Launched a Border Security Command to smash the people-smugglers. 

    Switched on Great British Energy to get Putin’s boot off our throat. Make our country more secure. Create good jobs – right across the country. 

    And it’s also why we’ve started the work of changing our economy. Stabilising it. Fixing its foundations. 

    But also – changing how it works for them. An employment bill that will finally make work pay.  That will contribute to growth and raise living standards for working people. A direct response to the cost-of-living crisis, we were elected to tackle for them. Because let me tell you, it is working people who pay the price when their Government fails to deliver economic stability. They’ve had enough of slow growth, stagnant living standards and crumbling public services.

    They know that austerity is no solution. And they’ve seen the chaos when politicians let borrowing get out of control.

    We choose a different path. Honest, responsible, long-term decisions in the interests of working people.

    Because it’s stability that means we can invest. And reform that will maximise that investment. £63 billion worth of investment secured from business two weeks ago – a record-breaking show of confidence in our plan for growth.  

    That’s investment that will create tens of thousands of jobs. Good jobs – in every corner of the country. 

    I know some people will recoil when we say we have to take the tough decisions needed to fix the foundations. 

    This doesn’t happen by accident it’s because business can see we are fixing the foundations. Everyone who finds damp in their house – know they have a decision. Paint over it or strip it out, pull off the plaster, deal with it once and for all. 

    So, I will defend our tough decisions all day long.

    It’s the right thing for our country. The only way you get the investment we need. Stability. Investment. Reform.

    That is how we fix the NHS, rebuild Britain, and protect the payslips of working people, delivering on our mandate of change.  

    That’s what the Budget this week will be about.  It’s what every week of this Government will be about. 

    A Budget for working people, from a government for working people. Because returning Britain to their service, that’s our fundamental cause – and it never changes. 

    It will also be the first budget delivered by a woman – ever. That is a moment of pride. That is a moment of pride. When Rachel Reeves stands up – she will be making history – young women and girls will watching across the country. They will look up – and they will notice.   

    It will also be a Budget which will show to the British people that we won’t be distracted from our task.  

    We will stick to our long-term plan.  Run towards the tough decisions, rip-off the short-term sticking plasters, so we can lead our country finally but decisively out of this ‘pay-more, get less’ doom-loop [political content removed].

    Of course there will still be tough decisions. Rebuilding Britain and delivering growth, that will take the skills and effort of all of us. 

    That is why this Budget will also Get Britain Working. It will pave the way for reforms that tackle the root causes of economic inactivity, make sure – that those who can work, do work. 

    [Political content removed] we will always help those who cannot support themselves, but the UK is the only G7 country where economic inactivity is still higher than it was before Covid.

    That is not just bad for our economy, it’s also bad for all those who are locked out of opportunity. So the Chancellor will announce £240 million in funding to provide local services that can help people back into work, and the dignity it brings.

    A Britain that works for working people. With all those who can, playing their part.

    We will also be ruthless in clamping down on government waste, just as we will be ruthless on clamping down on tax avoidance, so the British people that every penny counts.

    Every single person in this country had to do that during the cost-of-living crisis and government must be no different. 

    And frankly, when we’re asking broader shoulders to carry a higher burden on tax, that determination to be more productive and efficient in government, that’s the very least their contribution deserves.  

    Look – nobody wants higher taxes, just like nobody wants public spending cuts. But we have to be realistic about where we are as a country. This is not 1997, when the economy was decent but public services were on their knees.  And it’s not 2010, where public services were strong, but the public finances were weak. We have to deal with both sides of that coin.

    These are unprecedented circumstances, but the budget the Chancellor will deliver on Wednesday, will prevent devastating austerity in our public services and prevent a disastrous path for our public finances.

    [Political content removed]  

    And yes – things are worse than we could possibly have expected during the election – the Budget will set that out very clearly. 

    I mean – just look at the state of our prisons last week.

    [Political content removed]

    On Rwanda, asylum hotels, propping up failing train companies [Political content removed] .  An economy riddled with weakness on productivity and investment. A state that needs urgent modernisation to face down the challenge of a volatile world.  

    A country where people don’t just lack faith in politicians to fix any of this but also wonder – whether Britain can. Whether we still have the resources to move forward or whether decline is now an incurable disease.

    [Political content removed]

    I expect to be judged on my ability to deal with this. I expect to be judged on my ability to deal with it. Politics is always a choice. So we won’t hide from our decisions on Wednesday or for that matter, any day. 

    Besides, as I said two weeks ago at our International Investment Summit we have huge assets in this country. Leading positions in the industries of the future:

    Clean energy, artificial intelligence, life sciences, the creative industries, a technology sector that is the envy of Europe. A heritage steeped in science, trade and innovation. And values. Values deep in the bones of this nation and which say, to the world – this country is open for business. This country respects diversity and difference under the same flag. 

    We are still the country, known all around the world for our pragmatism and our creativity, the ingenuity and industry of our people and so if we do grasp the nettle on our economy, if we do fix those foundations, stick to those values and deliver the change working people need we won’t just get through this – better days are ahead. 

    Seriously – this is an economic plan that will change long-term British growth for the better. We are tackling the biggest challenges in our economy.  

    Higher investment – we’re dealing with it.

    Planning – we’re reforming it.

    The labour market – we’re getting people back to work, but also making sure work pays. 

    On competition – we’re stripping out the needless regulation that holds back private investment and all of this built on that foundation of economic stability. This is what fixing the foundations means.  

    What delivering change means. Everyone in this country will benefit from this. Everyone can wake up on Thursday and see that a new future is being built. A better future. But I tell you now – what we can’t do. Is waste any more time. 

    Politics is a choice and it’s time to choose a clear path.  

    It’s time to embrace the harsh light of fiscal reality. So we can come together behind a credible, long-term plan.  

    It’s time we ran towards the tough decisions because ignoring them set us on the path of decline. 

    It’s time we ignored the populist chorus of easy answers because we saw what happens if you reject the constraints of economic stability and we’re never going back to that. 

    That is our choice. Stability – to prevent chaos.

    Borrowing that will drive long-term growth.

    Tax rises – to prevent austerity and rebuild public services.

    We choose – to protect working people.

    We choose – to get the NHS back on its feet.

    We choose – to fix the foundations reject decline and rebuild our country with investment. 

    And while I’m sure you understand I can’t get into individual measures before Wednesday. I will say this. 

    If people want to criticise the path we choose – that’s their prerogative. But let them then spell out a different direction. 

    If they think the state has grown too big let them tell working people which public services they would cut. 

    If they think tax rises are unfair let them tell working people which taxes they’d raise instead. 

    If they don’t see our long-term investment in infrastructure as necessary let them explain to working people how they would grow the economy for them. 

    [Political content removed]

    Because I have said it before and I will say it again the time is long overdue for politicians in this country, to level with you, honestly about the trade-offs this country faces. 

    To stop insulting your intelligence with the chicanery of easy answers. Working people know that hard choices are necessary. 

    [Political content removed]

    They lived through the cost-of-living crisis so they know that the things they want from us:

    Protecting their living standards. 

    Rebuilding our nation.

    Fixing our public services.

    They know – that this can only be achieved alongside economic stability. There are no short-cuts. 

    No, what they want to see on Wednesday is a country on a different path. Making different choices. They don’t want to pay the price anymore, in times of crisis because our economic foundations are weak and they don’t want to see the proceeds of growth which could serve their family, their community, their public services – instead – always serving those at the top. 

    They want change and that is what they will get. 

    Because that is the mandate we were elected to deliver and the only path consistent with our driving purpose to return Britain to the service of working people.

    That purpose also runs through the priorities we set out in our manifesto. 

    The national missions which capture the hope working people have for the future of our country. Look – there is a paradox in politics at the moment.  

    All around the world, traditional values. Democratic values. Values that have underpinned the way countries like ours have operated for years. The pragmatism that is part of our identity, it’s under attack. 

    Why? 

    Because people – working people most of all have lost faith it can still deliver for their family. And yet, at the same time, what people want from politics that hasn’t changed. 

    People want a stable economy, they want their country to be safe, their borders secure. Economic security, national security, border security. Those are still the foundations everything rests upon. 

    And then beyond that they want exactly what those national missions promise. 

    A growing economy.

    Safer streets.

    Clean British energy in their home. 

    Opportunities for their children.

    And an NHS that is there when they need it. 

    I know populism preys on the fears people have that these things no longer belong to them.  But I have never felt the right response is to ignore those concerns rather than showing that they can still be delivered. 

    So I am never going to pick just one of these missions – and say that’s everything because every single one of them matters to working people. And for the same reason – I will never turn away from them either. 

    In fact, because I know actions speak louder than words because I expect to be judged by the British people.  

    In the coming weeks, on every mission, we will publish clear ambitions for this Parliament and we will also track our progress against them, so that every single person in this country can see exactly how we measure up to things that matter to them. 

    [Political content removed]

    They want to see us build 1.5m homes, make sure a record number of children start school ready to learn, raise living standards so that there is more cash in their pocket, restore confidence crime will be punished. Guaranteed neighbourhood policing in every community. 

    Make our energy system more secure by harnessing clean British energy, accelerating towards net-zero. 

    And on our NHS, they want us to cut waiting times dramatically and meet the 18-week target – that is still the best benchmark for an NHS that is back on its feet facing the future, once more – a beacon of pride to the world.

    These are my priorities for change and I won’t change course.  

    The budget will light the way and we will use the power of government.

    Stability, investment and reform, partnership across the whole of society, galvanised by clear objectives.

    To deliver on the priorities of the British people.  

    The foundations – fixed.  

    Public services – renewed. 

    A country rebuilt by investment.

    Released from decline.

    Returned once more.

    To the service of working people. 

    Now that is the course we set this week.

    That is the driving purpose of this government.

    That is the change we will deliver.

    Thank you very much.

    Updates to this page

    Published 28 October 2024

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Speech: PM speech in Birmingham: 28 October 2024

    Source: United Kingdom – Prime Minister’s Office 10 Downing Street

    Prime Minister Keir Starmer makes a speech in Birmingham.

    It’s always great to be here in Birmingham. A city that is at the heart, not just of our country but also – our plans for growth – as we announced two weeks ago £500m worth of new investment in battery storage will create the jobs of the future right here. And that’s a snapshot of the Britain we are building this week and beyond. 

    Our economy – stabilised. 

    The foundations – fixed. 

    Hope in the future – restored.  

    Another step taken on the long, difficult, but resolute path that we will walk.

    Towards a Britain returned to the service of working people.

    I said on the steps of Downing Street – the day after the election that this would be a government for the working people of this country. 

    That, when the cameras stopped rolling. When that black door closed. We would carry their hopes and aspirations with us. 

    That the basic, completely reasonable desire to want a better future for your family. That would become the driving purpose of this Government. 

    Now, I will never stand here and tell you to feel better, if you don’t. And I will never ask you to feel grateful for what you should expect as a given.  

    Trust in my project to return Britain to the service of working people can only be earned through actions not words: Change must be felt. 

    But every decision we have made. Every decision that we will make in the future will be made with working people in our minds’ eye. People who have been working harder and harder for years, just to stand still. 

    People doing the right thing maybe still finding a little bit of money to put away. Paying their way – even in the cost-of-living crisis but who feel this country no longer gives them or their children a fair chance. 

    People stuck on an NHS waiting list whose town centre is blighted by anti-social behaviour who can’t afford to buy a place they call home or can’t afford the home they have, because of the mortgage bombshell. 

    And people who feel ignored as their lives, no matter how hard they work slide into greater insecurity. Scared of the postman coming down the path – will it be another bill I can’t afford?

    People like that video, we just watched. [Political content removed]

    I know some people want to have a debate about this and I know there will always be the exception that proves the rule. Welcome to the wonders of a diverse country!  

    But I also know that the working people of this country know exactly who they are and that – they are the golden thread that runs through our agenda. Every single one of our national missions is about delivering for them. 

    And we are getting on with the job. That’s why we reformed planning rules to get Britain building again – restore the dream of home ownership.  

    It’s why we ended junior doctor strikes to lift the pressure on our NHS. Start cutting waiting lists. 

    It’s why we stopped the riots with tough sentences for violent thugs. 

    Launched a Border Security Command to smash the people-smugglers. 

    Switched on Great British Energy to get Putin’s boot off our throat. Make our country more secure. Create good jobs – right across the country. 

    And it’s also why we’ve started the work of changing our economy. Stabilising it. Fixing its foundations. 

    But also – changing how it works for them. An employment bill that will finally make work pay.  That will contribute to growth and raise living standards for working people. A direct response to the cost-of-living crisis, we were elected to tackle for them. Because let me tell you, it is working people who pay the price when their Government fails to deliver economic stability. They’ve had enough of slow growth, stagnant living standards and crumbling public services.

    They know that austerity is no solution. And they’ve seen the chaos when politicians let borrowing get out of control.

    We choose a different path. Honest, responsible, long-term decisions in the interests of working people.

    Because it’s stability that means we can invest. And reform that will maximise that investment. £63 billion worth of investment secured from business two weeks ago – a record-breaking show of confidence in our plan for growth.  

    That’s investment that will create tens of thousands of jobs. Good jobs – in every corner of the country. 

    I know some people will recoil when we say we have to take the tough decisions needed to fix the foundations. 

    This doesn’t happen by accident it’s because business can see we are fixing the foundations. Everyone who finds damp in their house – know they have a decision. Paint over it or strip it out, pull off the plaster, deal with it once and for all. 

    So, I will defend our tough decisions all day long.

    It’s the right thing for our country. The only way you get the investment we need. Stability. Investment. Reform.

    That is how we fix the NHS, rebuild Britain, and protect the payslips of working people, delivering on our mandate of change.  

    That’s what the Budget this week will be about.  It’s what every week of this Government will be about. 

    A Budget for working people, from a government for working people. Because returning Britain to their service, that’s our fundamental cause – and it never changes. 

    It will also be the first budget delivered by a woman – ever. That is a moment of pride. That is a moment of pride. When Rachel Reeves stands up – she will be making history – young women and girls will watching across the country. They will look up – and they will notice.   

    It will also be a Budget which will show to the British people that we won’t be distracted from our task.  

    We will stick to our long-term plan.  Run towards the tough decisions, rip-off the short-term sticking plasters, so we can lead our country finally but decisively out of this ‘pay-more, get less’ doom-loop [political content removed].

    Of course there will still be tough decisions. Rebuilding Britain and delivering growth, that will take the skills and effort of all of us. 

    That is why this Budget will also Get Britain Working. It will pave the way for reforms that tackle the root causes of economic inactivity, make sure – that those who can work, do work. 

    [Political content removed] we will always help those who cannot support themselves, but the UK is the only G7 country where economic inactivity is still higher than it was before Covid.

    That is not just bad for our economy, it’s also bad for all those who are locked out of opportunity. So the Chancellor will announce £240 million in funding to provide local services that can help people back into work, and the dignity it brings.

    A Britain that works for working people. With all those who can, playing their part.

    We will also be ruthless in clamping down on government waste, just as we will be ruthless on clamping down on tax avoidance, so the British people that every penny counts.

    Every single person in this country had to do that during the cost-of-living crisis and government must be no different. 

    And frankly, when we’re asking broader shoulders to carry a higher burden on tax, that determination to be more productive and efficient in government, that’s the very least their contribution deserves.  

    Look – nobody wants higher taxes, just like nobody wants public spending cuts. But we have to be realistic about where we are as a country. This is not 1997, when the economy was decent but public services were on their knees.  And it’s not 2010, where public services were strong, but the public finances were weak. We have to deal with both sides of that coin.

    These are unprecedented circumstances, but the budget the Chancellor will deliver on Wednesday, will prevent devastating austerity in our public services and prevent a disastrous path for our public finances.

    [Political content removed]  

    And yes – things are worse than we could possibly have expected during the election – the Budget will set that out very clearly. 

    I mean – just look at the state of our prisons last week.

    [Political content removed]

    On Rwanda, asylum hotels, propping up failing train companies [Political content removed] .  An economy riddled with weakness on productivity and investment. A state that needs urgent modernisation to face down the challenge of a volatile world.  

    A country where people don’t just lack faith in politicians to fix any of this but also wonder – whether Britain can. Whether we still have the resources to move forward or whether decline is now an incurable disease.

    [Political content removed]

    I expect to be judged on my ability to deal with this. I expect to be judged on my ability to deal with it. Politics is always a choice. So we won’t hide from our decisions on Wednesday or for that matter, any day. 

    Besides, as I said two weeks ago at our International Investment Summit we have huge assets in this country. Leading positions in the industries of the future:

    Clean energy, artificial intelligence, life sciences, the creative industries, a technology sector that is the envy of Europe. A heritage steeped in science, trade and innovation. And values. Values deep in the bones of this nation and which say, to the world – this country is open for business. This country respects diversity and difference under the same flag. 

    We are still the country, known all around the world for our pragmatism and our creativity, the ingenuity and industry of our people and so if we do grasp the nettle on our economy, if we do fix those foundations, stick to those values and deliver the change working people need we won’t just get through this – better days are ahead. 

    Seriously – this is an economic plan that will change long-term British growth for the better. We are tackling the biggest challenges in our economy.  

    Higher investment – we’re dealing with it.

    Planning – we’re reforming it.

    The labour market – we’re getting people back to work, but also making sure work pays. 

    On competition – we’re stripping out the needless regulation that holds back private investment and all of this built on that foundation of economic stability. This is what fixing the foundations means.  

    What delivering change means. Everyone in this country will benefit from this. Everyone can wake up on Thursday and see that a new future is being built. A better future. But I tell you now – what we can’t do. Is waste any more time. 

    Politics is a choice and it’s time to choose a clear path.  

    It’s time to embrace the harsh light of fiscal reality. So we can come together behind a credible, long-term plan.  

    It’s time we ran towards the tough decisions because ignoring them set us on the path of decline. 

    It’s time we ignored the populist chorus of easy answers because we saw what happens if you reject the constraints of economic stability and we’re never going back to that. 

    That is our choice. Stability – to prevent chaos.

    Borrowing that will drive long-term growth.

    Tax rises – to prevent austerity and rebuild public services.

    We choose – to protect working people.

    We choose – to get the NHS back on its feet.

    We choose – to fix the foundations reject decline and rebuild our country with investment. 

    And while I’m sure you understand I can’t get into individual measures before Wednesday. I will say this. 

    If people want to criticise the path we choose – that’s their prerogative. But let them then spell out a different direction. 

    If they think the state has grown too big let them tell working people which public services they would cut. 

    If they think tax rises are unfair let them tell working people which taxes they’d raise instead. 

    If they don’t see our long-term investment in infrastructure as necessary let them explain to working people how they would grow the economy for them. 

    [Political content removed]

    Because I have said it before and I will say it again the time is long overdue for politicians in this country, to level with you, honestly about the trade-offs this country faces. 

    To stop insulting your intelligence with the chicanery of easy answers. Working people know that hard choices are necessary. 

    [Political content removed]

    They lived through the cost-of-living crisis so they know that the things they want from us:

    Protecting their living standards. 

    Rebuilding our nation.

    Fixing our public services.

    They know – that this can only be achieved alongside economic stability. There are no short-cuts. 

    No, what they want to see on Wednesday is a country on a different path. Making different choices. They don’t want to pay the price anymore, in times of crisis because our economic foundations are weak and they don’t want to see the proceeds of growth which could serve their family, their community, their public services – instead – always serving those at the top. 

    They want change and that is what they will get. 

    Because that is the mandate we were elected to deliver and the only path consistent with our driving purpose to return Britain to the service of working people.

    That purpose also runs through the priorities we set out in our manifesto. 

    The national missions which capture the hope working people have for the future of our country. Look – there is a paradox in politics at the moment.  

    All around the world, traditional values. Democratic values. Values that have underpinned the way countries like ours have operated for years. The pragmatism that is part of our identity, it’s under attack. 

    Why? 

    Because people – working people most of all have lost faith it can still deliver for their family. And yet, at the same time, what people want from politics that hasn’t changed. 

    People want a stable economy, they want their country to be safe, their borders secure. Economic security, national security, border security. Those are still the foundations everything rests upon. 

    And then beyond that they want exactly what those national missions promise. 

    A growing economy.

    Safer streets.

    Clean British energy in their home. 

    Opportunities for their children.

    And an NHS that is there when they need it. 

    I know populism preys on the fears people have that these things no longer belong to them.  But I have never felt the right response is to ignore those concerns rather than showing that they can still be delivered. 

    So I am never going to pick just one of these missions – and say that’s everything because every single one of them matters to working people. And for the same reason – I will never turn away from them either. 

    In fact, because I know actions speak louder than words because I expect to be judged by the British people.  

    In the coming weeks, on every mission, we will publish clear ambitions for this Parliament and we will also track our progress against them, so that every single person in this country can see exactly how we measure up to things that matter to them. 

    [Political content removed]

    They want to see us build 1.5m homes, make sure a record number of children start school ready to learn, raise living standards so that there is more cash in their pocket, restore confidence crime will be punished. Guaranteed neighbourhood policing in every community. 

    Make our energy system more secure by harnessing clean British energy, accelerating towards net-zero. 

    And on our NHS, they want us to cut waiting times dramatically and meet the 18-week target – that is still the best benchmark for an NHS that is back on its feet facing the future, once more – a beacon of pride to the world.

    These are my priorities for change and I won’t change course.  

    The budget will light the way and we will use the power of government.

    Stability, investment and reform, partnership across the whole of society, galvanised by clear objectives.

    To deliver on the priorities of the British people.  

    The foundations – fixed.  

    Public services – renewed. 

    A country rebuilt by investment.

    Released from decline.

    Returned once more.

    To the service of working people. 

    Now that is the course we set this week.

    That is the driving purpose of this government.

    That is the change we will deliver.

    Thank you very much.

    Updates to this page

    Published 28 October 2024

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Exploring the Future of Cash in Germany — A Foresight Study | Guest contribution in Central Bank Payments News

    Source: Deutsche Bundesbank in English

    Safeguarding the role of cash …
    Many continue to experience the payment landscape in Germany as being shaped by cash. But in Germany, too, the use of cash has been declining for some years now. The coronavirus pandemic has significantly accelerated change processes in payment behaviour. While cash payments accounted for 82.5% of total transactions in 2008, their share fell to 51% in 2023. At the same time, we see an increase in the use of debit cards (27% in 2023) and mobile payments (6% in 2023).
    Nevertheless, cash remains an important part of economic life in Germany. Consumers expect to be able to pay with cash and want to maintain the freedom of choice between cash and cashless means of payment. On top of consumers’ preferences in favour of cash, the Bundesbank considers resilience, crisis preparedness, and inclusivity for all groups in society as further reasons why cash should be firmly anchored in the payment landscape. A functioning cash infrastructure with good access to cash and high acceptance rates of cash is crucial for this.
    The Bundesbank has a statutory mandate to facilitate the smooth functioning of cash and cashless payments. Together with the other Eurosystem central banks, the Bundesbank works to ensure that euro cash remains generally available and accepted as a means of payment and store of value. That said, some developments such as the declining use of cash for payments and the thinning out of ATM networks suggest that a future with cash cannot be taken for granted.
    … calls for future-oriented research
    With this in mind, the Bundesbank has turned its attention to exploring what sort of long-term future cash might have in Germany. In order to be able to proactively shape the evolution of cash in light of the trends we are currently seeing, we need an idea of the environment in which cash will be embedded in future. What developments and trends will influence the payment landscape and the cash cycle over the next 15 to 20 years?
    To take due account of the intricacies of the way in which cash is embedded in social and economic structures, a future-oriented study design is called for. One option is to take the strategic foresight route. The Bundesbank has therefore commissioned a study looking at the cash of the future, which uses this kind of method.
    Future scenarios for Germany’s payment landscape
    A commonly used approach in strategic foresight involves the development of future scenarios. These scenarios are hypothetical visions of the future on a set topic. The scenarios presented in the study describe potential futures for cash and the cash cycle in Germany from the perspective of the year 2037. They show alternative development paths and the influencing factors behind them.
    The scenarios are based on empirical evidence and were developed by strategic foresight experts working with established academic methods. It is important to appreciate that scenarios are not forecasts and, as such, do not represent precise predictions of a future that will definitely come to pass. What scenarios actually provide us with is a way to orient ourselves. What developments are possible, what are the dependencies between different developments and what are the consequences? The scenarios can thus play a role in decision-making and strategy-building and aid communication with stakeholders and the general public.
    A total of three scenarios were developed. In all three scenarios, cash use continues, albeit to different degrees. In all scenarios, cash is the only means of payment available as a fallback option in the event of technical outages.
    The hyperdigital payment world — artificially intelligent, convenient, and vulnerable
    This scenario is characterised by economic and social transformation aimed at safeguarding peace and prosperity. Geopolitical shifts and far-reaching digitalisation are the driving forces of this transformation. All areas of life are highly digitalised, and that includes making payments. The digital euro has already been introduced as legal tender. The majority of the public has a high degree of confidence in digital solutions, in the government, and in the providers of cashless means of payment. In this scenario, cash serves, at most, as a store of value.
    Cash has all but disappeared from everyday payment situations. Only 15% of all transactions are settled using cash in 2037. Payments between individuals are almost exclusively made via payment apps.
    Conventional online commerce, in which cash plays virtually no role, continues to grow strongly. When it comes to bricks-and mortar retail, hardly any checkouts are staffed anymore. Only a scarce few self-checkouts still accept cash payments. With a small number of exceptions, local governments, authorities, and public enterprises do not provide facilities for paying in cash either.
    Banks have massively thinned out their ATM network. With the disappearance of staffed checkouts in the retail sector and the cutback in cash payment options for customers, in-store cash withdrawal services — which are currently still commonplace — vanish as well. Cost pressures on the cash cycle increase considerably up to the end of the decade. Only a small number of effective measures to cut costs in the cash cycle are implemented.
    In accordance with an EU regulation, the Federal Government responds to the massive decline in the use of cash, adopting statutory standards to secure a basic level of cash provision for retailers and the general public. The aim of this move is to maintain the cash infrastructure in case there is a crisis.
    In summary, this scenario shows us a highly digitalised world in which cash plays only a minor role. It is barely able to perform its function as a crisis preparedness measure.
    The cash renaissance payment world — smart, self-determined, and resilient
    The world of this scenario has been shaped by the coronavirus pandemic, climate change, advances in general-purpose artificial intelligence (AI) and the war in Ukraine. On the back of recent experiences, the public has become more aware of the need to prepare for disasters and crises.
    Moreover, many people fear heteronomy and the notion of being controlled by self-learning AI systems trained on mass data. Ambitious individuals tending towards alternative lifestyles are advocating for the right to an analogue life, drawing attention to the dangers of AI and calling for data minimisation and digital sovereignty.
    The benefits of cash are being rediscovered. Cash is associated with values such as sovereignty, independence, and constructive rebellion. This heightened awareness of the benefits of cash gradually spreads into society’s centre ground. Despite the stabilising effects on cash use, cash made up less than 50% of transactions at the end of the 2020s.
    Policymakers were aware of the public’s desire for freedom of choice, as well as of the significance of cash for certain groups in society. Considerations around resilience and autonomy in payments prompted the Federal Government to take regulatory steps to strengthen cash as a means of payment. At the beginning of the 2030s, the Federal Government recommended that retailers should, as a basic principle, accept cash. All of the major supermarket chains offer both staffed checkouts and self-checkouts with cash payment modules.
    Due to an EU regulation on access to cash, the trend towards branch closures and the thinning out of the ATM network started to slow again from the mid-2020s. Clear regulation for maintaining cash infrastructures gives cash cycle stakeholders greater certainty for investing in innovation and cost-saving measures.
    All in all, in this scenario, we see parts of society circling back to cash and its benefits, meaning that cash use is declining only slowly and stabilises in the 2030s.
    The vanishing hybrid payment world — pluralistic, segregated, and indifferent
    In the 2020s, there was significantly greater individualisation and pluralisation in people’s living standards, lifestyles, and personal environments compared with the 2010s. Members of more progressive milieus, in particular, are regarded as early adopters when it comes to innovations in cashless payment instruments. But still, even those who mainly opt for cashless payments often carry an “emergency stash” of a few notes in their smartphone case or in their bag or pocket.
    At the end of the 2030s, cash is still being used by a large part of the population to pay street vendors, when tipping, as a gift to friends or family and when paying smaller amounts. The decline in cash use is gradual (31% of all transactions in 2037).
    The remaining bricks-and-mortar retailers are aware of the diverse preferences of their customer base. This means there is huge variation in terms of cashier system facilities and cash acceptance. However, bricks-and-mortar retailers encourage customers to use cashless payment methods. Public authorities are also coming to favour cashless means of payment.
    Banks continued to significantly reduce the number of their branches and ATMs throughout the country up to the end of the 2020s. As the share of cash is shrinking, less and less cash is coming into shop tills, meaning that in-store cash withdrawal services
    deteriorate. Overall, it becomes harder to access cash.
    A major crisis or disaster that could draw society’s attention to cash as a resilient means of payment fails to materialise. A pro-cash movement among the general public cannot be orchestrated in an increasingly segregated society. This means there is no political pressure to act and no resistance against the gradual decline of cash.
    A downward spiral is created: the use of cash continues to decline as access to and acceptance of cash become restricted. The fixed costs for the supply and removal of cash appear disproportionately high as cash volumes fall. Options for accessing cash and situations where it is accepted are therefore limited further. A hybrid payment landscape — something desired by large parts of society — slowly but surely disappears as it becomes more and more difficult to actually use cash.
    Current developments
    Once scenarios have been developed, they should be checked against current developments from time to time. It is important to bear in mind that certain trends already visible today might appear in one scenario or another but this does not necessarily mean that a particular scenario will occur. Nor do these trends make it more likely that one of the scenarios will prevail. This is because the developments described in the scenarios should not be looked at in isolation; it is only through their interplay that they mesh to form a holistic projection of the payment landscape in 2037.
    Cashless payments more convenient
    Recently published research by the Bundesbank shows that cash currently accounts for 51% of all transactions in Germany. Contactless cards and mobile payment methods are being used more and more frequently. Cashless means of payment are increasingly perceived as more convenient, faster, and easier than cash. These are characteristics regarded as key reasons in deciding for or against a means of payment in the “hyperdigital payment world” and “hybrid payment world” scenarios. On top of this, acceptance of cashless means of payment has risen sharply, including in former cash strongholds such as restaurants and cafés and the services industry. Against this background, the general trend of declining cash usage in the scenarios appears highly plausible.
    Cash availability and acceptance declining
    Acceptance of cash in Germany remains high, although it is slightly declining. Cash payments are almost universally accepted at retail outlets for day-to-day purchases. At retail outlets for durable goods and in the food services sector, acceptance has somewhat deteriorated. In public administration, meanwhile, cash acceptance is low and falling.
    As anticipated in all three scenarios, the number of ATMs and bank offices is declining sharply. The number of ATMs fell by 12% between 2019 and 2023. A weakening of this decline in the mid-2020s does not seem to be on the cards so far. As things currently stand, legal framework conditions creating guaranteed access to cash are lacking. Although more and more people are making use of the option to withdraw cash in shops, Germany’s Retail Federation (Handelsverband) is warning of service constraints if the declining propensity to pay in cash results in there not being enough cash in registers. These developments make a downward spiral of declining cash usage, acceptance of cash, and cash availability highly likely.
    Cash should not be taken for granted
    Cash use does not increase again in any of the scenarios. While the share of cash payments does slowly stabilise in the “cash renaissance” scenario, it steadily contracts in the other two. That said, neither of those two scenarios anticipate a complete disappearance of cash. But two of three scenarios — as well as the developments that we are currently seeing — suggest that its stabilising function and freedom of choice between cash and digital payments are not fully given anymore.
    The Bundesbank considers cash to be its core physical product and takes active measures to safeguard its continued existence and future use alongside its complement, the digital euro. However, the Bundesbank, too, has to adapt to the changing payment landscape. Under its new branch strategy the Bundesbank is aiming to create a more efficient branch network. Branch closures will go hand in hand with extensive investment into new and modern branches. Increased automation and simpler access routes for CIT companies will ensure a secure and efficient supply of cash in the long term.
    Society and policymakers called to action
    The scenarios also show that the responsibility does not lie solely with the Bundesbank. The Bundesbank’s measures will not be adequate unless they are accompanied by action from policymakers and society. That is why it is initiating further collaborative activities. The National Cash Forum brings the relevant stakeholders to the table to lay the groundwork for enhancing and stabilising the cash cycle. A joint dialogue with various interest groups from society culminated in position papers expressing a clear commitment to cash. We at the Bundesbank are committed to contributing to a future with cash.

    MIL OSI

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Economics: Almost there – navigating the last mile of disinflation in Latin America

    Source: Bank for International Settlements

    The Covid-19 pandemic required unprecedented policy actions from central bankers. After a faster-than-expected economic recovery, inflation surged to decades-high levels. Central banks raised policy rates and inflation fell substantially. Strong monetary policy frameworks helped Latin American central banks in keeping long-term inflation expectations anchored and avoiding financial crises.

    However, the final stage of reducing inflation to target levels, “the last mile,” remains challenging. While inflation is much lower, it is still not yet at target. Some countries even experienced a rebound. The final stage of disinflation will be different from the first phase. Base effects from the waning of the transitory factors that pushed up inflation play a much smaller role now. High and persistent growth in services prices will be a challenge, especially as wages continue to rise. Expansionary fiscal policies are counteracting restrictive monetary policies, complicating the path to achieving inflation targets. In addition, inflation is increasingly driven by domestic factors, reflecting greater economic and labour market disparities among countries.

    Central banks will have to proceed cautiously in the period ahead.

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI Security: Windsor Mill Woman Sentenced to More Than Five Years’ Imprisonment in Connection with Conspiracy Involving Fraudulently Obtaining and Attempting to Obtain More Than $3 Million in COVID-19 Cares Act Loans

    Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) State Crime Alerts (b)

    Glenn Used COVID-19 CARES Act Funds to Pay for a Vacation to Jamaica, a Mercedes-Benz, Luxury Jewelry, including a 31 Carat Diamond Necklace and items from Luis Vuitton, Neiman Marcus, Dior, Cartier, Gucci, Chanel and Hermes.

    Baltimore, Maryland – On October 23, 2024, Tomeka Glenn, a/k/a “Tomeka Harris” and “Tomeka Davis,” age 47, of Windsor Mill, Maryland, was sentenced by United States District Judge Richard D. Bennett to 65 months’ imprisonment and 3 years of supervised release in connection with her conviction on conspiracy to commit wire fraud relating to the submission of millions of dollars in fraudulent COVID-19 CARES Act Paycheck Protection Program and Economic Injury Disaster Loan applications.  Judge Bennett also directed Glenn to pay restitution in the amount of $3,016,275.62.

    Glenn’s co-defendant Kevin Davis, age 43, also of Windsor Mill, Maryland, pleaded guilty on January 25, 2024 to being a felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition.  Judge Bennett on May 22, 2024 sentenced him to 24 months’ imprisonment.

    The sentence was announced by Erek L. Barron, U.S. Attorney for the District of Maryland; Special Agent in Charge William J. Delbagno of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) Baltimore Field Office; and Chief Robert McCullough of the Baltimore County Police Department.

    Financial assistance offered through the CARES Act included forgivable loans to small businesses for job retention and certain other expenses through the Paycheck Protection Program, administered through the Small Business Administration (“SBA”).  The SBA also offered an Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) and/or an EIDL advance to help businesses meet their financial obligations.  An EIDL advance did not have to be repaid, and small businesses could receive an advance, even if they were not approved for an EIDL loan. The maximum advance amount was $10,000.

    According to Glenn’s plea agreement, beginning in June 2020 and continuing through March 2021,  Glenn and various co-conspirators prepared numerous false and fraudulent EIDL and PPP loan applications for various businesses (including some that did not exist in any legitimate capacity)  that included false information concerning, among other things, number of employees, monthly payroll costs, and revenue.  The PPP applications also routinely included false and fraudulent Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) tax forms and bank statements, which were submitted by Glenn to substantiate the false representations made in the applications. 

    Glenn admitted that she received kickback payments from the loan borrowers in exchange for her assistance in connection with the submission of fraudulent PPP and EIDL applications, ultimately receiving more than $400,000 in kickbacks in connection with the scheme.  These kickbacks typically amounted to 10% to 20% of the loan amount.  In total, the kickback scheme resulted in the disbursement of at least $2,715,649.12 in fraudulently obtained PPP and EIDL funds in connection with 23 fraudulent PPP and EIDL loans.

    According to Glenn’s plea agreement, Glenn and Davis, received $300,726.50 in PPP/EIDL funds for various entities that they controlled, and Glenn attempted to obtain $601,511.20 in additional fraudulent PPP and EIDL funds too. 

    Glenn used the fraudulently obtained funds to pay for a luxury vacation at a resort in Jamaica, to purchase a 2021 Mercedes-Benz S580 sedan valued at $148,171.60, to buy thousands of dollars in luxury jewelry, as well as numerous other luxury goods, including items from Luis Vuitton, Neiman Marcus, Dior, Cartier, Gucci, Chanel, and Hermes.

    At the time of her scheme, neither Glenn nor Davis had any legitimate source of income, and in May 2020, each applied for unemployment insurance benefits in the State of Maryland.  In addition, as detailed in Davis and Glenn’s plea agreements, on January 6, 2023, law enforcement executed a federal search warrant at their residence.  Davis and Glenn were present at the residence at the time of the search and were arrested in connection with the fraudulent COVID-19 CARES Act loans.  According to Davis’s plea agreement, during the execution of the search warrant, law enforcement found and seized four firearms loaded with ammunition—a 9mm firearm, and three .40 caliber firearms.  Later investigation revealed that  one of the .40 caliber firearms had earlier been reported stolen by its owner.  As further detailed in Davis’s plea, the firearms were hidden by Davis in the air ducts of the residence: two firearms were hidden in the main bedroom air duct where Davis slept and kept his personal effects; the other two firearms were in the air duct of the bathroom closets to the main bedroom.  Moreover, two of the firearms were further stuffed in socks in an attempt to hide them.  Davis admitted that he possessed and secreted the firearms in the air ducts of his home (and in the socks) in an attempt to conceal them from law enforcement after learning that federal agents had a warrant to search his home.  As admitted to at his plea, Davis’s concealment of the firearms constitutes attempted obstruction of the administration of justice with respect to the investigation.  Each of the four firearms recovered from Davis’s home on January 6, 2023 were later found to have his DNA on them.  A later review of Davis’s iCloud account revealed the existence of, among other things, a series of videos depicting Davis handling firearms, including a shotgun and an assault rifle.  Davis knew that his previous felony conviction prohibited him from possessing firearms or ammunition.

    As part of their plea agreements, Glenn and Davis will be required to forfeit their interest in any assets derived from or obtained by them as a result of, or used to facilitate the commission of, their illegal activities. Specifically, Glenn is required to forfeit a money judgment in the amount of at least $700,726.50; the 2021 Mercedes-Benz; cash in bank accounts she controlled that were held in the names of business entities; and jewelry, including her 3.03 carat yellow diamond engagement ring, Rolex, Cartier and Breitling watches, and a Diamond Miami Cuban Link Chain with 31.5 carats of VS1 diamonds.  Davis must forfeit the firearms and ammunition.

    The District of Maryland Strike Force is one of five strike forces established throughout the United States by the U.S. Department of Justice to investigate and prosecute COVID-19 fraud, including fraud relating to the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (“CARES”) Act.  The CARES Act was designed to provide emergency financial assistance to Americans suffering the economic effects caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.  The strike forces focus on large-scale, multi-state pandemic relief fraud perpetrated by criminal organizations and transnational actors.  The strike forces are interagency law enforcement efforts, using prosecutor-led and data analyst-driven teams designed to identify and bring to justice those who stole pandemic relief funds.

    For more information on the Department’s response to the pandemic, please visit https://www.justice.gov/coronavirus.  Anyone with information about allegations of attempted fraud involving COVID-19 can report it by calling the Department of Justice’s National Center for Disaster Fraud (NCDF) Hotline at 866-720-5721 or via the NCDF Web Complaint Form at: https://www.justice.gov/disaster-fraud/ncdf-disaster-complaint-form.

    U.S. Attorney Barron commended the FBI, the SBA-OIG, and the Baltimore County Police Department for their work in the investigation.  Mr. Barron thanked Assistant U.S. Attorney Paul A. Riley, who is prosecuting the case.  He also recognized the assistance of the Maryland COVID-19 Strike Force Paralegal Specialist Joanna B.N. Huber and Paralegal Specialist Juliette Jarman. 

    For more information on the Maryland U.S. Attorney’s Office, its priorities, and resources available to help the community, please visit www.justice.gov/usao/md.

    # # #

     

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Academy Street road marking and bollard removal works

    Source: Scotland – Highland Council

    The Highland Council have appointed a contractor (Markon) to carry out road marking works as part of a project to revert Academy Street in Inverness to pre-Covid traffic management.

    Work is due to start on Monday 4 November 2024 and will take between 4 and 5 days to complete. If the weather forecast is poor, the work may have to be delayed until the weather improves.

    The process of renewing Academy Street to pre covid Traffic Management will see the bollards removed just before the road marking works start.

    All of the bollards will be removed with the exception of those erected outside the Taxi Rank in the middle of the road on the approach to the Union Street Junction. These bollards are remaining as permanent traffic management measures to prevent U turn manoeuvres.

    The work is being planned to keep disruption at a minimum, however drivers using Academy Street should allow extra time for their journeys. Most of the work is being carried out during the daytime and some work carried out in the evening/overnight. Public Transport provision will be largely unaffected by the works.

    28 Oct 2024

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI USA: Georgia Woman Sentenced to 12 Years in Prison for $30M COVID-19 Unemployment Fraud Scheme and Firearms Charge

    Source: US State of California

    A Georgia woman was sentenced yesterday for her role in a scheme to defraud the Georgia Department of Labor (GaDOL) out of tens of millions of dollars in benefits meant to assist unemployed individuals during the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Tyshion Nautese Hicks, 32, of Vienna, was sentenced to 12 years in prison, three years of supervised release, and ordered to pay restitution in an amount to be determined at a later date. Hicks’ total sentence includes a penalty of three consecutive years in prison, imposed yesterday in relation to a separate charge of illegal possession of a machine gun prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Georgia.

    According to court documents and evidence presented in court, from March 2020 through November 2022, Hicks and her co-conspirators caused more than 5,000 fraudulent unemployment insurance (UI) claims to be filed with the GaDOL, resulting in at least $30 million in stolen benefits.

    “In one of the largest COVID fraud schemes ever prosecuted, the defendant and her coconspirators filed more than 5,000 fraudulent COVID unemployment insurance claims using stolen identities and unlawfully obtained more than $30 million in benefits,” said Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Nicole M. Argentieri, head of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division. “In doing so, the defendant and her co-conspirators exploited a program designed to alleviate pandemic-related economic hardship to enrich themselves at the expense of federal taxpayers. Yesterday’s sentence underscores the department’s commitment to investigating and prosecuting those who steal from the public fisc.”

    To execute the scheme, Hicks and others created fictitious employers and fabricated lists of purported employees using personally identifiable information (PII) from thousands of identity theft victims and filed fraudulent unemployment insurance claims on the GaDOL website. The co-conspirators obtained PII for use in the scheme from a variety of sources, including by paying an employee of an Atlanta-area health care and hospital network to unlawfully obtain patients’ PII from the hospital’s databases, and by purchasing PII from other sources over the internet. Using victims’ PII, Hicks and her co-conspirators caused the stolen UI funds to be disbursed via prepaid debit cards mailed to addresses of their choice, many of which were in and around Cordele and Vienna. Hicks additionally paid a local U.S. Postal Service (USPS) carrier to unlawfully divert mail containing debit cards loaded with over $512,000 in fraud proceeds to her and coached another co-conspirator on how to create her own fictitious employer account via Facebook Messenger.

    In February, Hicks pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit mail fraud and one count of aggravated identity theft. Seven of Hicks’ co-conspirators have previously pleaded guilty or been sentenced in the investigation.

    “Tyshion Nautese Hicks and her co-conspirators used the stolen PII of unwitting victims to file numerous fraudulent claims for UI benefits with the Georgia Department of Labor,” said Special Agent in Charge Mathew Broadhurst of the U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Inspector General (DOL-OIG) Southeast Regional Office. “We will continue to work with our federal and state law enforcement partners to safeguard UI benefit programs for those who need them.”

    “The sentence received by the defendant is the outcome of IRS Criminal Investigation’s commitment to investigating and prosecuting those who attempt to defraud various agencies by filing fraudulent claims using another person’s identifying information,” said Special Agent in Charge Demetrius Hardeman of the IRS Criminal Investigation (IRS-CI) Atlanta Field Office.

    “Postal Inspectors will continue to work with our law enforcement partners to hold individuals accountable for engaging in fraudulent schemes to manipulate the COVID-19 program for their own financial gain,” said Inspector in Charge Tommy D. Coke of the U.S. Postal Inspection Service (USPIS) Atlanta Division. “The sentencing should serve as a deterrence and shows that this type of behavior will not be tolerated.”

    “Yesterday’s sentencing underlines our commitment to holding those who exploit federal relief programs for personal gain accountable,” said Special Agent in Charge Jonathan Ulrich of the USPS Office of Inspector General (USPS-OIG). “As proven in this case, our criminal investigators along with our law enforcement partners will work together and diligently pursue anyone who attempts to exploit programs created to help legitimate people and businesses affected by the global pandemic.”

    “Hicks chose to commit fraud, further depleting limited funds designated to help individuals struggling to survive during the pandemic,” said Special Agent in Charge Frederick D. Houston of the U.S. Secret Service (USSS) Atlanta Field Office. “She and her co-conspirators also stole the personally identifiable information, caring only about self-enrichment, not the lives adversely affected. This case signifies our commitment to protect citizens and businesses from fraud and identity theft. We will continue to work with our local, state, and federal law enforcement partners to prosecute those who abuse these programs.”

    “Homeland Security Investigations will aggressively pursue those who exploit unemployment benefits meant for those in need, ensuring that justice is served, and resources are preserved for legitimate claimants,” said Acting Special Agent in Charge Steven N. Schrank of the Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) Atlanta Office.

    “Yesterday’s sentencing sends a clear message that those committing fraud will be held accountable,” said Inspector General Joseph V. Cuffari of the Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General (DHS-OIG). “DHS-OIG and our law enforcement partners will continue to prioritize protecting our country from these kinds of schemes.”

    DOL-OIG, IRS-CI, USPS-OIG, USPIS, USSS, HSI, and DHS-OIG investigated the case.

    Trial Attorneys Lyndie Freeman, Siji Moore, Matthew Kahn, and Andrew Jaco of the Criminal Division’s Fraud Section prosecuted the fraud case.

    On May 17, 2021, Attorney General Merrick B. Garland established the COVID-19 Fraud Enforcement Task Force to marshal the resources of the Justice Department in partnership with agencies across government to enhance efforts to combat and prevent pandemic-related fraud. The Task Force bolsters efforts to investigate and prosecute the most culpable domestic and international criminal actors and assists agencies tasked with administering relief programs to prevent fraud by, augmenting and incorporating existing coordination mechanisms, identifying resources and techniques to uncover fraudulent actors and their schemes, and sharing and harnessing information and insights gained from prior enforcement efforts. For more information on the department’s response to the pandemic, please visit www.justice.gov/coronavirus.

    Anyone with information about allegations of attempted fraud involving COVID-19 can report it by calling the Justice Department’s National Center for Disaster Fraud (NCDF) Hotline via the NCDF Web Complaint Form at www.justice.gov/disaster-fraud/ncdf-disaster-complaint-form. 

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Senators Reverend Warnock, Ossoff Announce $22 Million in Federal Funding to Further Close Digital Divide Across Georgia

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Reverend Raphael Warnock – Georgia

    Senators Reverend Warnock, Ossoff Announce $22 Million in Federal Funding to Further Close Digital Divide Across Georgia

    Funding will help create programs for working Americans to access laptops and tablets, connecting millions of households to more economic and educational opportunities
    Provisions in Bipartisan Infrastructure Law were based on Senator Reverend Warnock’s Device Access for Every American Act 
    The new funding seeks to make it easier for working families to keep up with the shift to a 21st century digital economy, schooling, and more
    4.4 million households with students lack consistent access to a computer
    ICYMI from May 2024: Touting Continuing Benefits of Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, Senator Reverend Warnock, Commerce Secretary Raimondo Celebrate New Jobs at Norcross Manufacturing Facility
    Senator Reverend Warnock: “It is not enough to just put fiber cables in the ground. We need to make sure our communities have the devices, resources, training, and low costs that will allow Georgians participate and thrive in our increasingly digital economy”

    Washington, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senators Reverend Raphael Warnock (D-GA) and Jon Ossoff (D-GA) announced $22,455,639 in federal funding for Georgia to create digital literacy programs, expand community access to computers and tablets, lower costs to get connected, and more. These funds were based in part on provisions from Senator Warnock’s Device Access for Every American Act that he successfully included in the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. Eligible uses include funding for digital literacy programs, partnerships with providers to improve internet affordability, and support for community anchor institutions like libraries, schools, community centers, and religious institutions to help connect, train, and educate communities in all aspects of digital connectivity and digital services. The grant will be distributed by the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) to the state. This funding also allows Georgia to begin implementation of its digital equity plans.

    “I am proud to have secured provisions in the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law to make this federal funding possible and help close the digital divide for communities across Georgia–particularly in our rural and underserved communities that for too long have been left behind,” said Senator Reverend Warnock. “It is not enough to just put fiber cables in the ground. We need to make sure our communities have the devices, resources, training, and low costs that will allow Georgians participate and thrive in our increasingly digital economy, and this multi-million dollar grant will do just that by creating digital literacy programs, expanding community access to computers and tablets, lowering costs to get connected, and more.”

    “Our historic bipartisan infrastructure law continues to deliver for Georgia, including historic Federal funding Senator Warnock and I have delivered to surge broadband connectivity across our state. Today’s announcement is another major next step toward ensuring every Georgia family, business, and farm has high-speed Internet,” said Senator Ossoff. 

    The growing need for reliable Internet connectivity and access to connected devices was exacerbated during the Covid-19 pandemic, which forced millions of Americans to shift to digital platforms for school, work, and other daily activities. But the evolving 21st century economy and technological revolution is only continuing these trends. Having a reliable broadband connection is increasingly as necessary as having running water or reliable electricity. However, many households struggle to keep up due to the lack of access to connected devices and the cost of acquiring them. Nationwide, 40% of working adults do not own a desktop or laptop computer. Additionally, 4.4 million households with students lack consistent access to a computer, making it difficult for these students to participate in class and complete schoolwork.

    Senator Warnock has been a champion for strengthening broadband access for Georgians across the state. In May 2024, Senator Warnock hosted Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo at Georgia-based OFS Fitel to uplift more $1 billion in Bipartisan Infrastructure Law funding coming to Georgia for broadband expansion to close the digital divide in communities across the state. Senator Warnock also led an effort urging the FCC to expand the E-Rate program, which would allow schools and libraries to provide Wi-Fi hotspots to students and educators. Additionally, in 2022 Senator Reverend Warnock hosted FCC Chair Rosenworcel in Jackson County to discuss the need for better broadband service in rural communities. Senator Warnock has also worked with Senator Luján to urge the FCC to prevent digital discrimination by facilitating equal access to broadband internet through its rulemaking process. Additionally, in a recent Senate Commerce committee hearing, Senator Warnock called out Congress’ inaction on funding the Affordable Connectivity Program and how a funding lapse would be detrimental to the more than 23 million Americans who depend on it, which includes 720,000 Georgians.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Missions – 28-30 October: INTA Delegation to London (UK) – 28-10-2024 – Committee on International Trade

    Source: European Parliament

    A delegation of six Members of the Committee on International Trade (INTA), accompanied by the Chair of the Delegation to the EU-UK Parliamentary Partnership Assembly, will travel to London (UK) from 28 to 30 October 2024. The delegation, led by the INTA Chair, Bernd Lange (S&D, DE), will exchange with the UK government, parliamentarians and stakeholders on the trade aspects of the EU-UK Withdrawal Agreement, including the Windsor Framework, and the Trade and Cooperation Agreement.

    The context of this visit is the ‘reset’ of the EU-UK relations announced recently by the UK Prime Minister, the first review of the TCA due in 2026 and the upcoming democratic consent vote of the Northern Ireland Legislative Assembly on the continuation of the application of major provisions of the Windsor Framework in December 2024.

    The UK and the EU are also faced with the same challenges at global level regarding international trade. In the past decade, geopolitical and geoeconomic tensions have heightened, in part due to the strategic competition between the United States and China. In the last few years the situation has deteriorated further, notably due to the supply chain disruptions from the Covid-19 pandemic and to the impact of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, as well as recently the major crisis in the Middle East, bringing both competitiveness and economic security to the forefront.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Pressley Applauds Biden-Harris Admin’s Student Debt Relief for Borrowers Experiencing Hardship

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congresswoman Ayanna Pressley (MA-07)

    Proposed Rules Would Authorize Debt Relief to Nearly 8 Million Borrowers Struggling with High Medical Costs, Childcare Costs, and Other Hardships

    Pressley Has Repeatedly Called Upon and Partnered with White House to Center Struggling Borrowers in Student Debt Cancellation Efforts

    BOSTON – Today, Congresswoman Ayanna Pressley (MA-07) applauded the release of the Biden-Harris Administration’s proposed rules to authorize student debt relief to nearly 8 million borrowers experiencing financial hardship. The new rules, which are expected to be published in the coming weeks, follows repeated calls by Rep. Pressley and her colleagues to ensure borrowers experiencing hardship receive the student debt cancellation they need.

    “Government works best when it solves problems and alleviates hardships for the people it serves, and this proposed rule to cancel the student debt for millions of additional borrowers is a powerful example of how the Biden-Harris Administration continues to do just that,” said Congresswoman Pressley. “This will have a lasting and life-changing impact for millions of borrowers who are struggling to balance student loan payments and medical bills, childcare costs, caregiving expenses, and more. The automatic cancellation provision is particularly notable and responsive to calls from borrowers and advocates alike. I thank President Biden, Vice President Harris, and Secretary Cardona for their partnership and continuing to advance student debt cancellation despite Republicans’ efforts to obstruct this relief at every turn. This is the type of leadership we need in this moment.”

    These proposed regulations would reach borrowers with persistent financial burdens that prevent them from repaying their student loans and who do not sufficiently benefit from other currently available forgiveness options. Such financial burdens could include unexpected medical bills, high child care costs, significant expenses related to caring for loved ones with chronic illnesses, or devastating economic circumstances from the impacts of a natural disaster.  

    More information about U.S. Department of Education’s new rule is available here.

    Rep. Pressley has been a leading voice in Congress urging President Biden to cancel student debt. Following years of advocacy by Rep. Pressley—in partnership with colleagues, borrowers, and advocates—the Biden-Harris Administration announced a historic plan to cancel student debt that stands to benefit over 40 million people. She has consistently helped borrowers access student debt cancellation resources, including PSLF, and she was proud to welcome a union educator and PSLF recipient as her guest to President Biden’s State of the Union Address in March.

    • On October 18, 2024, Rep. Pressley applauded the Biden-Harris Administration’s approval of approximately $4.5 billion in additional student debt cancellation for approximately 60,000 workers nationwide who work in public service.
    • On October 2, 2024, Rep. Pressley joined borrowers and advocates to unveil new state-by-state data quantifying the harm that Project 2025 would have on millions of public service workers nationwide.
    • On September 10, 2024, Rep. Pressley joined Senator Warren and Rep. Jim Clyburn in urging the U.S. Department of Education to consider terminating its contract with student loan servicer MOHELA.
    • On August 29, Rep. Pressley issued a statement following the Supreme Court’s refusal to reinstate President Biden’s Saving on a Valuable Education (SAVE) student debt relief program.
    • On August 9, 2024, Rep. Pressley joined Senator Warren, Representative Dean, and their colleagues urging student loan servicer Navient to reform its flawed process to cancel the private student loans of borrowers who attended fraudulent, for-profit colleges.
    • On June 25, 2024, Rep. Pressley issued a statement on federal judges in Missouri and Kansas siding with Republican states to block portions of President Biden’s Saving on a Valuable Education (SAVE) student debt relief program. 
    • On June 25, 2024, Rep. Pressley colleagues, borrowers, and advocates urged the Biden Administration to terminate the contract of federal student loan servicer MOHELA. Their calls follow MOHELA’s repeated failure to perform basic loan servicing functions and ongoing harm caused by MOHELA to student loan borrowers.
    • On May 20, 2024, Rep. Pressley, along with Reps. Omar, Clyburn and Wilson, led their colleagues in urging the U.S. Department of Education to ensure its proposed student debt relief rule is implemented in the most effective and efficient manner possible for millions of borrowers.
    • On May 1, 2024, Rep. Pressley issued a statement applauding the Biden Administration’s approval of student loan discharge for 317,000 borrowers who attended The Art Institutes, including over 3,500 borrowers in Massachusetts.
    • On April 14, 2024, Rep. Pressley applauded President Biden’s approval of an additional $7.4 billion in student debt cancellation for 277,000 borrowers.
    • On April 8, 2024, Rep. Pressley hailed President Biden’s announcement of new plans to provide student debt relief for tens of millions of borrowers across the country.
    • On March 21, 2024, Rep. Pressley applauded the Biden-Harris Administration’s approval of $5.8 billion in additional student loan debt cancellation for 77,700 public service workers.
    • On March 20, 2024, Rep. Pressley and Senator Elizabeth Warren led their colleagues in calling on federal agencies to end the practice of offsetting Social Security benefits to pay off defaulted student loans.
    • On March 7, 2024, Rep. Pressley welcomed Priscilla Higuera Valentine, a first generation American, a proud union educator with Boston Public Schools and the Boston Teachers Union, and the daughter of a Colombian immigrant, who has received over $117,000 in student debt relief under the Biden-Harris Administration’s improved Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) Program, as her guest to President Biden’s State of the Union Address.
    • On February 23, 2024, Rep. Pressley applauded the Biden-Harris Administration’s approval of $1.2 billion in student debt cancellation for nearly 153,000 borrowers nationwide, including $19.5 million in cancellation for 2,490 Massachusetts borrowers.
    • On January 26, 2024, Rep. Pressley and Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) led their colleagues in calling on the Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona to host a fourth session of the student debt negotiated rulemaking to consider relief for borrowers experiencing financial hardship. She applauded ED’s announcement that it would heed their calls.
    • On December 11, 2023, Rep. Pressley testified at the U.S. Department of Education’s final hearing on student debt cancellation.
    • On December 11, 2023, Rep. Pressley and Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), along with Senators Chuck Schumer (D-NY), Bernie Sanders (I-VT), Alex Padilla (D-CA), and Representatives Ilhan Omar (MN-05) and Frederica Wilson (FL-24), sent a letter to U.S. Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona, urging him to leverage his existing and full authority under the Higher Education Act to provide expanded student debt relief to working and middle-class borrowers. 
    • On November 30, 2023, Rep. Pressley emphasized the crucial role of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) in protecting student loan borrowers from incompetent and predatory student loan servicers.
    • On November 6, 2023, Rep. Pressley joined Attorney General Andrea Campbell, Mayor Michelle Wu, and Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) for a clinic to help federal student loan borrowers access a temporary opportunity to get closer to Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF). 
    • On September 25, 2023, Rep. Pressley hosted a policy discussion with borrowers and advocates at which they renewed their urgent call for student debt cancellation with loan payments set to resume on October 1, 2023.
    • On August 23, 2023, Rep. Pressley, Sen. Warren, and their colleagues led over 80 lawmakers in a letter to President Joe Biden, urging him to swiftly deliver on his promise to deliver student debt cancellation to working and middle class families by early 2024. 
    • On August 22, 2023 Rep. Pressley applauded Governor Maura Healey’s plan to provide student debt relief for health care workers in Massachusetts. 
    • On June 30, 2023, Rep. Pressley responded to the President’s alternative proposal to deliver relief under the Higher Education Act and called for swift and efficient implementation.
    • On June 30, 2023, Rep. Pressley issued a statement slamming the Supreme Court’s decision to block President Biden’s student debt cancellation plan and calling on the President to use other tools available to swiftly cancel student debt.
    • On May 30, 2023, Rep. Pressley filed an amendment to H.R. 3746, legislation to raise the debt ceiling, to protect student loan borrowers and preserve the Biden Administration’s pause on federal student loan payments.
    • On May 24, 2023, Rep. Pressley issued a statement slamming Republicans’ harmful effort to overturn President Biden’s student debt relief, including his debt cancellation plan, the pause on student loan payments, and the expanded Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) program.
    • On May 24, 2023, Rep. Pressley delivered a powerful speech in support of President Biden’s plan to cancel student debt, which would benefit millions of people across the country.
    • On April 5, 2023, Rep. Pressley and Senator Elizabeth Warren wrote to the CEO of SoFi Technologies and SoFi Lending Corp calling on the company to answer for its lawsuits attempting to end the student loan payment pause and force borrowers back into repayment.
    • On March 7, 2023, Rep. Pressley, along with Sens. Warren, Schumer, Sanders, Padilla and Reps. Clyburn, Omar and Wilson led a letter to the Biden Administration expressing continued support for President Biden’s student debt relief plan.
    • On February 28, 2023, Rep. Pressley rallied with borrowers and advocates outside the Supreme Court to call on the Supreme Court to affirm the legality of President Biden’s student debt cancellation plan.
    • On November 22, 2022, Rep. Pressley issued a statement applauding the extension of the student loan payment pause.
    • On October 25, 2022, Rep. Pressley and Senator Warren toured communities across Massachusetts to celebrate the Biden administration’s student debt cancellation plan and help residents sign up for student loan relief.
    • On October 12, 2022, Rep. Pressley joined parent borrowers and advocates for a discussion on the impacts of student debt cancellation on parents and families.
    • On September 29, 2022, Rep. Pressley, along with Senate Majority Leader Schumer and Reps. Omar, Jones and advocates, held a press conference to call for swift and equitable implementation of President Biden’s student debt cancellation plan.
    • On September 21, 2022, Rep. Pressley delivered a powerful speech on the House floor in which she heralded President Biden’s action to cancel student debt for millions of families in the Massachusetts 7th and across the nation. Watch the full video here.
    • On September 12, 2022, Rep. Pressley and Senator Warren wrote to the nine federal student loan servicers to inquire about how they are providing borrowers with accurate and timely information about student loan cancellation.
    • On August 24, 2022, Congresswoman Pressley issued a statement applauding President Biden’s action to cancel student debt.
    • On August 10, 2022, Congresswoman Pressley and Senator Warren Massachusetts joined Massachusetts union leaders in Dorchester for a roundtable discussion on student debt cancellation.
    • On July 18, 2022, Congresswoman Pressley delivered remarks at the American Federation of Teachers (AFT) national convention and renewed her calls for President Biden to cancel student debt by executive action.
    • On July 8, 2022, Congresswoman Pressley with The Debt Collective hosted a virtual roundtable with student debt holders from all walks of life to highlight the intersectional burden the nearly $2 trillion student debt crisis has had on individuals and families. 
    • On June 22, 2022, Congresswoman Ayanna Pressley, with Senator Elizabeth Warren and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, joined AFL-CIO and union leaders for a roundtable discussion on the importance of student debt cancellation for American workers.
    • On May 20, 2022, Congresswoman Pressley applauded the Congressional Black Caucus’ (CBC) statement calling on President Biden to cancel student loan debt.
    • On May 4, 2022, Congresswoman Pressley visited Bunker Hill Community College to celebrate the $1 million in federal community project funding she secured and continued her calls for President Biden to cancel student debt.
    • On March 17, 2022, Congresswoman Pressley and Arisha Hatch, vice president and chief of campaigns at Color of Change, published an op-ed in Grio calling on President Biden to use his executive order authority to cancel up to $50,000 in student loan debt per borrower.
    • On December 8, 2021, Congresswoman Ayanna Pressley, Senator Elizabeth Warren, and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer sent a bicameral letter to President Joe Biden releasing new data about the adverse impact of restarting student loan payments and calling on him to act to cancel up to $50,000 of student debt.
    • On December 2, 2021, Congresswoman Pressley delivered remarks on the House floor in which she reiterated her calls for President Biden to cancel $50,000 in federal student loan debt by executive action.
    • On October 8, 2021, Representatives Ayanna Pressley and Ilhan Omar and their House colleagues sent a letter to President Biden and Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona urging him to release the memo to determine the extent of the administration’s authority to broadly cancel student debt through administrative action.
    • On July 29, 2021, Congresswoman Pressley issued a statement reaffirming President Biden’s authority – and the urgency – to cancel student loan debt.
    • On June 23, 2021, Congresswoman Ayanna Pressley, Senator Elizabeth Warren, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, and Congressman Joe Courtney led their colleagues on a bicameral letter to President Biden calling on him to extend the pause on federal student loan payments.
    • On April 13, 2021, Congresswoman Pressley testified at a Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee’s Subcommittee on Economic Policy hearing to examine the student loan debt crisis in our country.
    • On April 1, 2021, Congresswoman Pressley, along with Senator Elizabeth Warren and Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey, held a press conference calling on President Biden to tackle the student loan debt crisis.
    • On February 4, 2021, Congresswoman Pressley, along with several Democratic House and Senate leaders, led their colleagues in reintroducing a bicameral resolution outlining a bold plan for President Biden to tackle the student loan debt crisis. 
    • On December 17, 2020, Representatives Ayanna Pressley, Ilhan Omar, Maxine Waters, and Alma Adams introduced a resolution outlining a bold plan for President-elect Joe Biden to cancel up to $50,000 in Federal student loan debt for student loan borrowers.
    • On December 10, 2020, Congresswoman Pressley was in Yahoo Finance urging the Biden administration to cancel student debt, stressing the impact on Black borrowers.
    • On May 8, 2020, Representatives Ayanna Pressley, Alma Adams, and Ilhan Omar, led 28 of their colleagues and sent a letter to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy calling for the universal, one-time, student debt cancellation of at least $30,000 per borrower in the next round of COVID-19 relief legislation.
    • On March 23, 2020, Representatives Ayanna Pressley and Ilhan Omar introduced the Student Debt Emergency Relief Act, legislation that provides immediate monthly payment relief for federal student loan borrowers.
    • On March 17, 2020, Congresswoman Ayanna Pressley and Senator Elizabeth Warren were on The Hill calling on congressional leadership to include student debt cancellation in the next coronavirus relief package.
    • On October 11, 2019, Congresswoman Pressley introduced legislation – the Ending Debt Collection Harassment Act – to protect consumers from abusive debt collection.
    • On July 17, 2019, Congresswomen Pressley introduced legislation – the Student Borrower Credit Improvement Act – to provide much needed support to private student loan borrowers with a pathway to financial stability by helping them improve their credit.

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Security: Windsor Mill Woman Sentenced To Over Five Years’ Imprisonment In Connection With Conspiracy Involving Fraudulently Obtaining And Attempting To Obtain More Than $3 Million In Covid-19 Cares Act Loans

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    Glenn Used COVID-19 CARES Act Funds to Pay for a Vacation to Jamaica, a Mercedes-Benz, Luxury Jewelry, including a 31 Carat Diamond Necklace and items from Luis Vuitton, Neiman Marcus, Dior, Cartier, Gucci, Chanel and Hermes.

    Baltimore, Maryland – On October 23, 2024, Tomeka Glenn, a/k/a “Tomeka Harris” and “Tomeka Davis,” age 47, of Windsor Mill, Maryland, was sentenced by United States District Judge Richard D. Bennett to 65 months’ imprisonment and 3 years of supervised release in connection with her conviction on conspiracy to commit wire fraud relating to the submission of millions of dollars in fraudulent COVID-19 CARES Act Paycheck Protection Program and Economic Injury Disaster Loan applications.  Judge Bennett also directed Glenn to pay restitution in the amount of $3,016,275.62.

    Glenn’s co-defendant Kevin Davis, age 43, also of Windsor Mill, Maryland, pleaded guilty on January 25, 2024 to being a felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition.  Judge Bennett on May 22, 2024 sentenced him to 24 months’ imprisonment.

    The sentence was announced by Erek L. Barron, U.S. Attorney for the District of Maryland; Special Agent in Charge William J. Delbagno of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) Baltimore Field Office; and Chief Robert McCullough of the Baltimore County Police Department.

    Financial assistance offered through the CARES Act included forgivable loans to small businesses for job retention and certain other expenses through the Paycheck Protection Program, administered through the Small Business Administration (“SBA”).  The SBA also offered an Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) and/or an EIDL advance to help businesses meet their financial obligations.  An EIDL advance did not have to be repaid, and small businesses could receive an advance, even if they were not approved for an EIDL loan. The maximum advance amount was $10,000.

    According to Glenn’s plea agreement, beginning in June 2020 and continuing through March 2021,  Glenn and various co-conspirators prepared numerous false and fraudulent EIDL and PPP loan applications for various businesses (including some that did not exist in any legitimate capacity)  that included false information concerning, among other things, number of employees, monthly payroll costs, and revenue.  The PPP applications also routinely included false and fraudulent Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) tax forms and bank statements, which were submitted by Glenn to substantiate the false representations made in the applications. 

    Glenn admitted that she received kickback payments from the loan borrowers in exchange for her assistance in connection with the submission of fraudulent PPP and EIDL applications, ultimately receiving more than $400,000 in kickbacks in connection with the scheme.  These kickbacks typically amounted to 10% to 20% of the loan amount.  In total, the kickback scheme resulted in the disbursement of at least $2,715,649.12 in fraudulently obtained PPP and EIDL funds in connection with 23 fraudulent PPP and EIDL loans.

    According to Glenn’s plea agreement, Glenn and Davis, received $300,726.50 in PPP/EIDL funds for various entities that they controlled, and Glenn attempted to obtain $601,511.20 in additional fraudulent PPP and EIDL funds too. 

    Glenn used the fraudulently obtained funds to pay for a luxury vacation at a resort in Jamaica, to purchase a 2021 Mercedes-Benz S580 sedan valued at $148,171.60, to buy thousands of dollars in luxury jewelry, as well as numerous other luxury goods, including items from Luis Vuitton, Neiman Marcus, Dior, Cartier, Gucci, Chanel, and Hermes.

    At the time of her scheme, neither Glenn nor Davis had any legitimate source of income, and in May 2020, each applied for unemployment insurance benefits in the State of Maryland.  In addition, as detailed in Davis and Glenn’s plea agreements, on January 6, 2023, law enforcement executed a federal search warrant at their residence.  Davis and Glenn were present at the residence at the time of the search and were arrested in connection with the fraudulent COVID-19 CARES Act loans.  According to Davis’s plea agreement, during the execution of the search warrant, law enforcement found and seized four firearms loaded with ammunition—a 9mm firearm, and three .40 caliber firearms.  Later investigation revealed that  one of the .40 caliber firearms had earlier been reported stolen by its owner.  As further detailed in Davis’s plea, the firearms were hidden by Davis in the air ducts of the residence: two firearms were hidden in the main bedroom air duct where Davis slept and kept his personal effects; the other two firearms were in the air duct of the bathroom closets to the main bedroom.  Moreover, two of the firearms were further stuffed in socks in an attempt to hide them.  Davis admitted that he possessed and secreted the firearms in the air ducts of his home (and in the socks) in an attempt to conceal them from law enforcement after learning that federal agents had a warrant to search his home.  As admitted to at his plea, Davis’s concealment of the firearms constitutes attempted obstruction of the administration of justice with respect to the investigation.  Each of the four firearms recovered from Davis’s home on January 6, 2023 were later found to have his DNA on them.  A later review of Davis’s iCloud account revealed the existence of, among other things, a series of videos depicting Davis handling firearms, including a shotgun and an assault rifle.  Davis knew that his previous felony conviction prohibited him from possessing firearms or ammunition.

    As part of their plea agreements, Glenn and Davis will be required to forfeit their interest in any assets derived from or obtained by them as a result of, or used to facilitate the commission of, their illegal activities. Specifically, Glenn is required to forfeit a money judgment in the amount of at least $700,726.50; the 2021 Mercedes-Benz; cash in bank accounts she controlled that were held in the names of business entities; and jewelry, including her 3.03 carat yellow diamond engagement ring, Rolex, Cartier and Breitling watches, and a Diamond Miami Cuban Link Chain with 31.5 carats of VS1 diamonds.  Davis must forfeit the firearms and ammunition.

    The District of Maryland Strike Force is one of five strike forces established throughout the United States by the U.S. Department of Justice to investigate and prosecute COVID-19 fraud, including fraud relating to the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (“CARES”) Act.  The CARES Act was designed to provide emergency financial assistance to Americans suffering the economic effects caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.  The strike forces focus on large-scale, multi-state pandemic relief fraud perpetrated by criminal organizations and transnational actors.  The strike forces are interagency law enforcement efforts, using prosecutor-led and data analyst-driven teams designed to identify and bring to justice those who stole pandemic relief funds.

    For more information on the Department’s response to the pandemic, please visit https://www.justice.gov/coronavirus.  Anyone with information about allegations of attempted fraud involving COVID-19 can report it by calling the Department of Justice’s National Center for Disaster Fraud (NCDF) Hotline at 866-720-5721 or via the NCDF Web Complaint Form at: https://www.justice.gov/disaster-fraud/ncdf-disaster-complaint-form.

    U.S. Attorney Barron commended the FBI, the SBA-OIG, and the Baltimore County Police Department for their work in the investigation.  Mr. Barron thanked Assistant U.S. Attorney Paul A. Riley, who is prosecuting the case.  He also recognized the assistance of the Maryland COVID-19 Strike Force Paralegal Specialist Joanna B.N. Huber and Paralegal Specialist Juliette Jarman. 

    For more information on the Maryland U.S. Attorney’s Office, its priorities, and resources available to help the community, please visit www.justice.gov/usao/md.

    # # #

     

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: Georgia Woman Sentenced to 12 Years in Prison for $30M COVID-19 Unemployment Fraud Scheme and Firearms Charge

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    A Georgia woman was sentenced yesterday for her role in a scheme to defraud the Georgia Department of Labor (GaDOL) out of tens of millions of dollars in benefits meant to assist unemployed individuals during the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Tyshion Nautese Hicks, 32, of Vienna, was sentenced to 12 years in prison, three years of supervised release, and ordered to pay restitution in an amount to be determined at a later date. Hicks’ total sentence includes a penalty of three consecutive years in prison, imposed yesterday in relation to a separate charge of illegal possession of a machine gun prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Georgia.

    According to court documents and evidence presented in court, from March 2020 through November 2022, Hicks and her co-conspirators caused more than 5,000 fraudulent unemployment insurance (UI) claims to be filed with the GaDOL, resulting in at least $30 million in stolen benefits.

    “In one of the largest COVID fraud schemes ever prosecuted, the defendant and her coconspirators filed more than 5,000 fraudulent COVID unemployment insurance claims using stolen identities and unlawfully obtained more than $30 million in benefits,” said Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Nicole M. Argentieri, head of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division. “In doing so, the defendant and her co-conspirators exploited a program designed to alleviate pandemic-related economic hardship to enrich themselves at the expense of federal taxpayers. Yesterday’s sentence underscores the department’s commitment to investigating and prosecuting those who steal from the public fisc.”

    To execute the scheme, Hicks and others created fictitious employers and fabricated lists of purported employees using personally identifiable information (PII) from thousands of identity theft victims and filed fraudulent unemployment insurance claims on the GaDOL website. The co-conspirators obtained PII for use in the scheme from a variety of sources, including by paying an employee of an Atlanta-area health care and hospital network to unlawfully obtain patients’ PII from the hospital’s databases, and by purchasing PII from other sources over the internet. Using victims’ PII, Hicks and her co-conspirators caused the stolen UI funds to be disbursed via prepaid debit cards mailed to addresses of their choice, many of which were in and around Cordele and Vienna. Hicks additionally paid a local U.S. Postal Service (USPS) carrier to unlawfully divert mail containing debit cards loaded with over $512,000 in fraud proceeds to her and coached another co-conspirator on how to create her own fictitious employer account via Facebook Messenger.

    In February, Hicks pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit mail fraud and one count of aggravated identity theft. Seven of Hicks’ co-conspirators have previously pleaded guilty or been sentenced in the investigation.

    “Tyshion Nautese Hicks and her co-conspirators used the stolen PII of unwitting victims to file numerous fraudulent claims for UI benefits with the Georgia Department of Labor,” said Special Agent in Charge Mathew Broadhurst of the U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Inspector General (DOL-OIG) Southeast Regional Office. “We will continue to work with our federal and state law enforcement partners to safeguard UI benefit programs for those who need them.”

    “The sentence received by the defendant is the outcome of IRS Criminal Investigation’s commitment to investigating and prosecuting those who attempt to defraud various agencies by filing fraudulent claims using another person’s identifying information,” said Special Agent in Charge Demetrius Hardeman of the IRS Criminal Investigation (IRS-CI) Atlanta Field Office.

    “Postal Inspectors will continue to work with our law enforcement partners to hold individuals accountable for engaging in fraudulent schemes to manipulate the COVID-19 program for their own financial gain,” said Inspector in Charge Tommy D. Coke of the U.S. Postal Inspection Service (USPIS) Atlanta Division. “The sentencing should serve as a deterrence and shows that this type of behavior will not be tolerated.”

    “Yesterday’s sentencing underlines our commitment to holding those who exploit federal relief programs for personal gain accountable,” said Special Agent in Charge Jonathan Ulrich of the USPS Office of Inspector General (USPS-OIG). “As proven in this case, our criminal investigators along with our law enforcement partners will work together and diligently pursue anyone who attempts to exploit programs created to help legitimate people and businesses affected by the global pandemic.”

    “Hicks chose to commit fraud, further depleting limited funds designated to help individuals struggling to survive during the pandemic,” said Special Agent in Charge Frederick D. Houston of the U.S. Secret Service (USSS) Atlanta Field Office. “She and her co-conspirators also stole the personally identifiable information, caring only about self-enrichment, not the lives adversely affected. This case signifies our commitment to protect citizens and businesses from fraud and identity theft. We will continue to work with our local, state, and federal law enforcement partners to prosecute those who abuse these programs.”

    “Homeland Security Investigations will aggressively pursue those who exploit unemployment benefits meant for those in need, ensuring that justice is served, and resources are preserved for legitimate claimants,” said Acting Special Agent in Charge Steven N. Schrank of the Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) Atlanta Office.

    “Yesterday’s sentencing sends a clear message that those committing fraud will be held accountable,” said Inspector General Joseph V. Cuffari of the Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General (DHS-OIG). “DHS-OIG and our law enforcement partners will continue to prioritize protecting our country from these kinds of schemes.”

    DOL-OIG, IRS-CI, USPS-OIG, USPIS, USSS, HSI, and DHS-OIG investigated the case.

    Trial Attorneys Lyndie Freeman, Siji Moore, Matthew Kahn, and Andrew Jaco of the Criminal Division’s Fraud Section prosecuted the fraud case.

    On May 17, 2021, Attorney General Merrick B. Garland established the COVID-19 Fraud Enforcement Task Force to marshal the resources of the Justice Department in partnership with agencies across government to enhance efforts to combat and prevent pandemic-related fraud. The Task Force bolsters efforts to investigate and prosecute the most culpable domestic and international criminal actors and assists agencies tasked with administering relief programs to prevent fraud by, augmenting and incorporating existing coordination mechanisms, identifying resources and techniques to uncover fraudulent actors and their schemes, and sharing and harnessing information and insights gained from prior enforcement efforts. For more information on the department’s response to the pandemic, please visit www.justice.gov/coronavirus.

    Anyone with information about allegations of attempted fraud involving COVID-19 can report it by calling the Justice Department’s National Center for Disaster Fraud (NCDF) Hotline via the NCDF Web Complaint Form at www.justice.gov/disaster-fraud/ncdf-disaster-complaint-form

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: UPDATE TO COVID-19 VACCINATION RECOMMENDATIONS AND ROLLOUT OF UPDATED JN.1 VACCINES

    Source: Asia Pacific Region 2 – Singapore

    The Ministry of Health (MOH) will roll out the updated JN.1 Pfizer-BioNTech/Comirnaty and JN.1 Moderna/Spikevax vaccines from 28 October 2024. This is based on the 2024/2025 recommendation of the Expert Committee for Immunisation (ECI). The vaccination is especially applicable to individuals at increased risk of severe COVID-19, such as seniors and those who are medically vulnerable. 
    2.      With close to 500 Healthier SG General Practitioner (GP) clinics and 10 polyclinics offering COVID-19 vaccination in the community, the five remaining Joint Testing and Vaccination Centres (JTVCs) will cease operations from 1 December 2024. 
    ECI’s Updated COVID-19 Vaccine Recommendations 
    3.       We are living with COVID-19 as an endemic disease. The severity of COVID-19 infection is low in the healthy general population, given that most of our local population has either taken the vaccine and/or been infected with COVID-19 and recovered safely. 
    4.       Hence the ECI has recommended that individuals at increased risk of severe COVID-19 should receive both the initial (if unvaccinated) and additional doses of the COVID-19 vaccine, as they will benefit most from increased protection with vaccination. The persons recommended for COVID-19 vaccination in 2024/2025 are: 
    a.       Individuals aged 60 years and above; 
    b. Medically vulnerable individuals aged 6 months and above; and  
    c. Residents of aged care facilities.  
    5.       Healthcare workers and persons living or working with medically vulnerable individuals are encouraged to consider receiving the vaccine. Other individuals aged 6 months and above who wish to receive the COVID-19 vaccine can continue to do so.

    6.        Unvaccinated individuals who are receiving COVID-19 vaccination in 2024/2025 should receive: 

    a. Ages 6 months to 4 years: Two vaccine doses, eight weeks apart; and 
    b. Ages 5 years and older: One vaccine dose. 
    7.       The number of initial doses recommended for unvaccinated individuals aged 5 years and above has been reduced from two doses (as previously recommended) to one dose, as most in this population would have some level of protection from past COVID-19 infection. One initial dose is now assessed to be sufficient to ensure an adequate level of protection in unvaccinated persons aged 5 years and above.
    8.       Vaccinated individuals aged 6 months and above who are receiving an additional dose of COVID-19 vaccination in 2024/2025 should receive it at an interval of around one year (and at least five months) from the last vaccine dose. 
    Rollout of Updated JN.1 Pfizer-BioNTech/Comirnaty and Moderna/Spikevax Vaccines 
    9.       The Health Sciences Authority has approved the use of the updated JN.1 Pfizer-BioNTech/Comirnaty and JN.1 Moderna/Spikevax vaccines in Singapore. 
    10.       From 28 October 2024, all vaccination locations offering the Pfizer-BioNTech/Comirnaty and/or Moderna/Spikevax vaccines will begin administering the updated JN.1 vaccines. 
    11.       The updated COVID-19 vaccines provide a stronger immune response against current and emerging strains compared to previous versions of the vaccines, and therefore confer better protection against COVID-19. The safety profiles of the updated vaccines are comparable to that of previous versions.
    Closure of JTVCs from 1 December 2024
    12.       The JTVCs have served us well in offering mass testing and vaccination services during the pandemic. To bring COVID-19 vaccination closer to the community, close to 500 Healthier SG GP clinics and 10 polyclinics located island-wide are now providing COVID-19 vaccination services. In addition, more Healthier SG GP clinics will be onboarded to offer the COVID-19 vaccines.
    13.       With this, the five remaining JTVCs at Bukit Merah, Jurong East, Kaki Bukit, Sengkang and Woodlands will cease operations from 1 December 2024. Individuals who wish to receive their COVID-19 vaccinations at these locations may walk in by 30 November 2024, or visit https://vaccine.gov.sg/covid to book an appointment.
    14.       Mobile vaccination teams offering the COVID-19 vaccines will continue to be deployed across the island. Members of the public can visit https://gowhere.gov.sg/vaccine for the latest schedule. 
    15.       COVID-19 vaccination continues to be free for all eligible individuals under the National Vaccination Programme. Members of the public can visit https://gowhere.gov.sg/vaccine for the nearest vaccination sites and the vaccine types offered. Individuals may book an appointment at a Healthier SG GP clinic through https://vaccine.gov.sg/covid, or at a polyclinic through the HealthHub booking system. 
    16.       COVID-19 waves will continue to occur from time to time and can cause severe disease among those who are older or medically vulnerable. To increase their protection against severe disease, we encourage everyone to remain updated with their vaccination based on the prevailing recommendations, much like vaccination against influenza.

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-OSI Canada: New research investments in the transmission of respiratory infectious diseases

    Source: Government of Canada News

    Today, the Honourable Mark Holland, Minister of Health, announced research grants for four organizations through the Public Health Agency of Canada’s Transmission Dynamics of Respiratory Infectious Diseases Research Funding Opportunity.

    October 25, 2024 | Ottawa, Ontario | Public Health Agency of Canada

    Understanding how different respiratory infectious diseases, like COVID-19, influenza and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), spread in our environment is important to help prevent serious negative health outcomes. Further research into how these diseases are transmitted and prevented can help inform public health measures that are timely and effective in reducing the impacts of respiratory illness on individuals and the health system.

    Today, the Honourable Mark Holland, Minister of Health, announced research grants for four organizations through the Public Health Agency of Canada’s Transmission Dynamics of Respiratory Infectious Diseases Research Funding Opportunity. Queen’s University, Carleton University, the Ontario Agency for Health Protection and Promotion, and the University of Waterloo will receive funding to work on individual projects investigating the transmission dynamics of respiratory infectious diseases.

    These projects will help expand our understanding of respiratory infectious diseases and inform advice for people in Canada on effective measures to prevent their spread. This information will also help prepare for future pandemic planning and response, helping people in Canada prepare for respiratory outbreaks and take the steps needed to keep themselves and others healthy. 

    Matthew Kronberg
    Press Secretary
    Office of the Honourable Mark Holland
    Minister of Health
    343-552-5654

    MIL OSI Canada News

  • MIL-OSI Global: MAiD and marginalized people: Coroner’s reports shed light on assisted death in Ontario

    Source: The Conversation – Canada – By Karandeep Sonu Gaind, Professor of Psychiatry, University of Toronto

    People who chose medically assisted death when they were not terminally ill were more likely to be marginalized than those who chose MAiD when death was already imminent. (Shutterstock)

    Earlier this month, the Office of the Chief Coroner for Ontario released new reports highlighting some of the reasons some Canadians have chosen medical assistance in dying (MAiD, which in Canada involves euthanasia — meaning medically-administered injection rather than self-administered — over 99.9 per cent of the time).

    The reports have received international attention for what they highlight, including patients being euthanized despite untreated mental illness and addictions, unclear medical diagnoses and suffering fuelled by housing insecurity, poverty and social marginalization.

    Some are shocked by what these reports reveal, but none should be surprised. This is what happens when you let the foxes run the henhouse, as Canada has arguably done by allowing right-to-die advocacy to shape policy and replace evidence.

    Canada’s medical assistance in dying (MAiD) laws, introduced for those in terminal situations, were expanded by the Trudeau government in 2021 to allow death by MAiD via “Track 2” to Canadians struggling with disabilities who were not dying. In 2023, Track 2 represented 2.6 per cent of the 4,644 MAiD deaths in Ontario, or 116 people.

    I am not a conscientious objector. I am a psychiatrist and previously chaired my former hospital’s MAiD team. However, I believe we’ve experienced a bait and switch: laws initially intended to compassionately help Canadians avoid suffering a painful death have metastasized into policies facilitating suicides of other Canadians seeking death to escape a painful life.

    The coroner’s reports show how far over the cliff we’ve fallen with Track 2 MAiD.

    Marginalization and MAiD

    Many have warned for years that when facilitated suicide is expanded to those with disabilities who have decades left to live, it is impossible to filter out suffering due to poverty, loneliness and other marginalization fueling MAiD requests. The medical disability becomes the foot in the door to open eligibility for MAiD, but social suffering pushes the marginalized through that door to seek state-sponsored death for their life struggles.

    The coroner’s report uses a marginalization index based on area of residence (similar to the way impacts on marginalized populations were identified during COVID-19) to divide the population into five levels, each representing 20 per cent of the population. The data shows a much higher proportion of Track 2 MAiD recipients come from highly marginalized categories than Track 1 MAiD recipients, or the general population.

    People in the lowest “material resource” category (i.e. poverty) represent 20 per cent of the general population, but they make up 28.4 per cent of Track 2 MAiD recipients, compared to 21.5 per cent of Track 1 recipients.

    People in the lowest 20 per cent of the population with the worst housing instability made up 48.3 per cent of Track 2 MAiD recipients, compared to 34.3 per cent of Track 1 recipients. Track 2 recipients were also far more likely to come from the most vulnerable 20 per cent of the population in terms of age and labour force participation, with 56.9 per cent of Track 2 MAiD recipients coming from this category compared to 41.8 per cent of Track 1 MAiD recipients.

    Gender gaps of more women than men receiving Track 2 MAiD are also emerging.

    Additionally the report shed light on specific cases of concern, including people receiving Track 2 MAiD for social and housing vulnerability, and for unclear reasons while still suffering from inadequately treated mental illness and addictions.

    This includes a man with a history of suicidal ideation and untreated addictions whose psychiatrist asked during a session whether he was aware of MAiD. After being approved, he was “personally transported (by the MAiD provider) in their vehicle to an external location for the provision of MAiD”.

    Denialism

    Policy mistakes can occur, but these marginalized deaths result from wilful avoidance and denial of evidence-based cautions. I have previously written of the lack of safeguards and absence of evidence informing MAiD expansion.

    Beyond the evidence in the coroner’s report, there are clear signs of this denial:

    It doesn’t concern me, in the sense that I don’t think anybody knows what it means. We can make all sorts of hypotheses about what it might mean, but nobody really knows. What I would caution you about is drawing inferences, like the one in your question with respect to male-to-female suicide ratios, because we don’t know what it means.” (It should be noted that there is longstanding evidence of a 2:1 gender gap of more women than men attempting suicide when mentally ill, most of whom do not die by suicide and do not try again.)

    These repeated refusals to have our MAiD expansion be informed by evidence have led to a MAiD house of cards wilfully blind to suicide risks.

    Denialism of all sorts is dangerous. Canada’s expanded MAiD policies have fallen prey to a new form of it: suicide denialism. What else can it be called when expansion ideologues repeatedly ignore and deny the fact that some Canadians are getting Track 2 MAiD fuelled not by illness suffering, but by known suicide risk factors of social deprivation?

    ‘Social murder’

    People in the lowest ‘material resource’ category represent 20 per cent of the general population, but they make up 28.4 per cent of Track 2 MAiD recipients, compared to 21.5 per cent of Track 1 recipients.
    (Shutterstock)

    Some expansion advocates have already creatively dismissed concerns about the coroner reports. The head-scratching argument is that since marginalization leads to higher death rates of the marginalized anyway (gently referred to as “decedents”), the fact that Track 2 MAiD is provided to marginalized people at the same or slightly lower rates than their usual high “decedent” rates means MAiD is not a risk to the marginalized. There is even the bold suggestion that “MAiD narrows the gap between privileged and deprived.”

    The remarkable blind spot of this privileged perspective is obvious: none of the marginalized receiving Track 2 MAiD would have died if they had not gotten MAiD; even their own MAiD assessors predicted they would have over another decade of life to live (otherwise they would have been Track 1).

    Arguing that a higher proportion of marginalized people dying from Track 2 MAiD is acceptable because they die at similar rates anyway is disturbing and revealing. Most people in Canada are aware of the issue of Indigenous youth disenfranchisement and suicide. Consider the natural implications of this dangerous argument. Death rates for First Nations youth under 20 are three to five times higher than youth death rates for non-Indigenous populations, driven by suicide and unintentional injuries. Does MAiD expansionist logic suggest that it would be acceptable to provide high levels of Track 2 MAiD to First Nations 19-year-olds since their social disenfranchisement puts them at higher risk of death anyway?

    Claiming that state-facilitated death fuelled by social deprivation is acceptable since more marginalized people die from social deprivation and structural inequities anyway is indistinguishable from eugenics.

    During COVID-19, some suggested our social policies linked to marginalized deaths were enabling “social murder,” a term coined by Friedrich Engels in the 19th century describing working conditions causing premature deaths of English workers. How should we describe Canadian policy providing state facilitated deaths to non-dying marginalized individuals fuelled by social suffering?

    I previously wrote about how our MAiD expansion is setting the stage for a future prime minister issuing a national apology. Beyond apologies, tobacco companies recently were held accountable for a $32.5 billion settlement resulting from claims they “knew their product was causing cancer and failed to warn consumers adequately.”

    No medication comes to market without evidence of safety, yet policymakers have ignored known evidence and have instead expanded MAiD while failing to warn Canadians adequately of the risks of premature death posed by Track 2 MAiD to those suffering from social marginalization.

    Social murder is a jarring term. If we don’t want to be charged with providing it, it’s time policymakers honestly acknowledged the suffering for which some marginalized Canadians are receiving state sponsored MAiD, rather than taking refuge behind “small numbers” justifications and suicide denial.

    Karandeep Sonu Gaind is affiliated with the Ontario District Branch of the American Psychiatric Association (president).

    ref. MAiD and marginalized people: Coroner’s reports shed light on assisted death in Ontario – https://theconversation.com/maid-and-marginalized-people-coroners-reports-shed-light-on-assisted-death-in-ontario-241661

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI Canada: Standing up for Alberta’s livestock industry

    Source: Government of Canada regional news

    [embedded content]

    The federal government’s Bill C-293, An Act respecting pandemic prevention and preparedness, is currently moving through the Senate, despite the risks it brings to the agriculture and food industry. Alberta’s government is standing with industry members against this highly intrusive legislation that unfairly singles out the agriculture and food industry and encroaches on Section 95 of the Constitution, which sets agriculture within the exclusive jurisdiction of the province.

    Under the proposed legislation, public health officials would have the authority during a pandemic to close facilities they consider “high risk,” such as livestock operations and meat processing plants, and even “mandate” the consumption of vegetable proteins by Canadians. Not only would this threaten global food security and the role Alberta and Canada play in feeding the world, but it would also open the door for the federal government to tell Canadians what they can eat.

    “Farming is woven into the fabric of our national identity, with modern livestock agriculture playing a vital role. Bill C-293, however, goes so far as to pick winners and losers within the agriculture sector, with potentially wide-reaching, catastrophically damaging regulations and restriction of commercial freedoms for agricultural producers and processors.”

    RJ Sigurdson, Minister of Agriculture and Irrigation

    The proposed legislation also introduces several public health mitigation strategies that may not align with local health data and do not adequately reflect specific regional needs. Provinces and territories have exclusive jurisdiction over the planning, organization and management of their health care systems, including response to public health emergencies, and the federal bill would once again enable the federal government to overreach their constitutional jurisdiction.

    “Local governing bodies are in the best position to create emergency preparedness plans that suit the unique needs of their province and territory. The federal government should be engaging meaningfully with each jurisdiction on any Pandemic Prevention and Preparedness Plan related to Bill C-293 before being implemented.”

    Adriana LaGrange, Minister of Health

    One of the bill’s most alarming aspects is the discretionary power it would grant to officials to shut down agricultural facilities without clear, objective criteria. Such uninformed actions could disrupt not only meat supply chains, but also the wider agricultural operations linked to them, including feed production. This threatens to destabilize related sectors and could trigger cascading effects throughout the entire food system.

    Additionally, the bill seeks to regulate and possibly phase out certain farming practices considered high-risk for pandemic propagation. This could abruptly alter farm and ranch operations, significantly affect producers and processors livelihoods, and negatively impact our economic stability.

    Key Canadian agricultural organizations representing the province’s agriculture sectors are echoing Alberta’s concerns about this bill.

    “Our Alberta family farms are committed to producing safe, high-quality chicken while maintaining the highest standards of biosecurity. We support pandemic preparedness, but Bill C-293 unfairly targets animal agriculture and could threaten the livelihoods of our farm families. We are asking the federal government to ensure this bill is amended so farmers can continue to feed Canadians without facing unnecessary restrictions.”

    David Hyink, chair, Alberta Chicken Producers

    “Alberta Beef Producers supports the overall objective of pandemic preparedness. However, we are disappointed in the current wording of Bill C-293, as it unfairly singles out animal agriculture, despite the industry’s critical role in food security and rural economies. We urge policymakers to amend the bill to reflect a balanced and fair approach that supports emergency preparedness without unfairly targeting a single sector.”

    Doug Roxburgh, vice-chair, Alberta Beef Producers

    The legislation purports to examine pandemic preparedness and apply learnings from COVID-19, but it has dangerously imprecise language that is open to drastic interpretations. For example, the bill provides for measures to “regulate commercial activities that can help reduce pandemic risk, including industrial animal agriculture.” The bill also suggests phasing out “commercial activities that disproportionately contribute to pandemic risk,” which puts Alberta’s agriculture industry at risk, in addition to others.

    Alberta has sent a letter to Alberta senators and the ministers of Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada and Health Canada to relay concerns with the bill’s content. Minister Sigurdson requested that the bill be amended with more flexible language to avoid unintended consequences.

    Canada already has legislation, animal disease surveillance and action plans to ensure farm food safety and biosecurity programs reduce risks associated with zoonotic disease. This new legislation is therefore unnecessary, especially in its current form.

    Quick facts

    • The bill would require the development of a human pandemic prevention and preparedness plan; however, after consultation with the Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada and provincial governments, the bill alludes to:
      • regulating industrial animal agriculture to reduce any possible contribution to pandemic risk (zoonotic diseases);
      • phasing out farming of livestock species that might pose a high risk; and
      • promoting alternative protein sources for human consumption.
    • The bill also contains measures that would be redundant in noted areas of concern around disease surveillance, regulation of livestock production and antimicrobial resistance.
      • Intensive livestock and poultry production carries some risk for zoonotic diseases like influenza in swine or poultry or coronaviruses in swine or cattle, but Canada’s on-farm food safety and biosecurity programs greatly reduce those risks.
      • The notion of sacrificing Canadian production levels and exports without assessing the disease risk in a global context, by comparing to livestock markets and production systems in other countries, could result in wide-reaching economic and global food security implications.
    • The bill outlines the requirement to form an advisory committee within 90 days after being passed.
      • This may provide some ability to influence the course of direction, but it is unclear what power the advisory committee would have.

    Multimedia

    • Watch the news conference

    MIL OSI Canada News

  • MIL-OSI Economics: Transcript of Press Briefing: Middle East and Central Asia Department Regional Economic Outlook October 2024

    Source: International Monetary Fund

    October 24, 2024

    PARTICIPANTS:

    JIHAD AZOUR, Director of Middle East and Central Asia Department, International Monetary Fund

    ANGHAM AL SHAMI, Communications Officer, International Monetary Fund

    *  *  *  *  *

    MS. AL SHAMI: Good morning.  Good afternoon to those of you in the region.  Thank you for joining us to this press briefing on the Regional Economic Outlook for the Middle east and Central Asia.  I’m Angham Al Shami from the Communications Department here at the IMF.  If you’re joining us online, we do have Arabic and French interpretations on the IMF Regional Economic Outlook page and IMF Press Center.  So please join us there and we have interpretations also in the room.  I’m joined here today by Jihad Azour, the Director of the Middle East and Central Asia Department here at the IMF and he’s going to give us an overview of the outlook for the region.  Jihad over to you. 

    MR. AZOUR: Angham, thank you very much.  Good morning everyone and welcome to the 2024 Annual Meetings.  Before taking your questions, I will make few brief remarks to highlight three key messages regarding the economic outlook for the Middle East and North Africa (MENA), as well as the Caucasus and Central Asia (CCA).  First, regarding the outlook, growth is set to strengthen in the near term in both MENA and the CCA regions.  However, exposure to broader geoeconomic developments is adding to uncertainty.  Hence, our 2025 forecasts come with important caveats. 

              Let me start with the Middle East and North Africa.  This year has been challenging, with conflicts causing devastating human suffering and economic damage.  Oil production cuts are contributing to sluggish growth in many economies, too.  The recent escalation in Lebanon has increased uncertainty in the MENA region.  The second important issue is on growth.  For 2024, growth is projected at 2.1 percent, a downgrade revision of 0.6 percent from the April WEO forecast, and this is largely due to the impact of the conflict and the prolonged OPEC+ production cuts.  To the extent that these gradually abate, we anticipate stronger growth of 4 percent in 2025.  However, uncertainty about when these factors will ease is still very high. 

              MENA oil exporters are expected to see growth rise from 2.3 percent this year to 4 percent in 2025, contingent on the expiration of the voluntary oil production cuts.  Growth in oil importers is projected to recover from 1.5 percent in 2024 to 3.9 percent in 2025, assuming conflicts ease.  Let me now turn to the outlook for Caucasus and Central Asia.  The CCA regions continue to show robust growth, which was revised up to 4.3 percent in 2024, with growth of 4.5 percent expected for next year.  However, some economies are seeing tentative signs of slower trade and other inflows, especially on the remittance side.  Subdued oil production is weighing on the medium-term growth prospect for CCA oil exporters. And for oil importers, growth projects depend on the reform implementation.  The disinflation process is continuing and is continuing across both MENA and CCA region with headline inflation coming down significantly compared to the peak levels over the past two years.  However, inflation remains elevated in few cases due to country specific challenges. 

              My second point is on the medium-term growth prospects.  Medium-term growth prospects have faded over the past two decades and are now relatively weak in many economies.  Changing these dynamics requires steady reform implementation.  Priorities are for the MENA and CCA regions include governance improvement, job creation, especially for women and youth, investment promotion and financial development.  Achieving stronger and more resilient growth will not only foster job creation and greater inclusion, but will also help reduce elevated debt levels and enable progress toward the development of social spending goals. 

              My third point is on the uncertainty.  High uncertainty means that the economic outlook is fraught with risks.  The recent intensification of conflict in Lebanon has increased uncertainty and risks to a further level, and the risk of further escalation in the MENA region is the main issue here in terms of increase in risks.  This fluid situation is not yet factored in our analysis, and downside risks could be material depending on the extent of the escalation.  We are closely monitoring the situation and assessing the potential economic impacts.  Overall, the impact will depend on the severity of any potential escalation.  The conflict could impact the region through multiple channels.  Beyond the impact on output, other key channels of transmissions could include tourism, trade, potential refugee and migration flows, oil and gas market volatility, financial markets and social unrest. 

              Concern is also high about the possibility of prolonged conflict in Sudan, increased geoeconomic fragmentation, volatility in commodity prices, especially for the oil exporting countries, high debt and financing needs for emerging markets and recurrent climate shocks.  In the CCA, risks are primarily associated with potential financial instability resulting from sudden shift in trade and financial flows, and for both regions, failure to implement sufficient reform could constrain already muted prospects for medium term growth. 

              Before opening the floor to your questions, let me emphasize the Fund’s commitment to supporting economies across the region.  Our engagement remains strong in terms of financing and presence.  Since early 2020, the Fund has approved $47.7 billion in financing to countries across MENA and CCA and we have carried out capacity development projects for 31 countries only in the last fiscal years.  Thank you very much for being here today and I’m now happy to take your questions. 

    MS. AL SHAMI: So, we’ll now turn to your questions.  If you’re on Webex, please turn on your camera and raise your hand and we will call on you.  And if you’re in the room, please raise your hand.  So let’s start with maybe the middle right here, the gentleman. 

    QUESTIONER:  Hello and good morning, Jihad.    I wanted to bring you back to your comments about the risks of an escalation in the region.  Obviously, the human toll of this would be horrific, but in terms of the impact on the economies in the region, particularly Egypt, which is already suffering from an extreme loss of revenues from the Suez Canal, and then Lebanon, which you’ve had discussions with in the past, those really never went anywhere because of lack of commitment to do reforms.  What are the prospects of having to either redo some of the programs or create new ones if there’s an escalation?  Thank you. 

    MS. AL SHAMI: Thank you, Dave.  Maybe we’ll take another question on the conflict.  Kyle, second row here. 

    QUESTIONER:  Hi, good morning.  Thank you for taking my question.  Earlier this morning, the Managing Director said the outlook for the MENA is significantly downgraded and she cited mostly the geopolitical conflict.  So could you walk us through, like, where exactly the economic impact has been felt since the April release? 

    MS. AL SHAMI: Maybe we’ll take those two questions, Jihad, on the conflict. 

    AZOUR: Thank you very much.  Well, first of all, the conflict is inflicting heavy human toll, and our hearts goes to all the victims and those who were, in their life and livelihoods were affected by the escalation of the conflict.  Of course, the impact of the conflict is to be differentiated between countries who are at the epicenter.  The group of countries who are severely affected by the conflict, Gaza, West Bank, the whole Palestinian economy has been severely affected.  Lebanon also.  And the Lebanese economy was severely affected, with more than 1.2 million people displaced, which represent almost 25 percent of the population, destruction of livelihoods in a broad region that is mainly agriculture, and the impact on some key sectors like tourism and trade.  Therefore, the severely affected countries are seeing a large drop in their economic activity, and they will face contraction in their economies in the context of high inflation. 

              The second group I would call the group of partially affected countries.  And here we have countries like Jordan, Syria and Egypt.  And you have mentioned Egypt.  The main channel of impact on Egypt is trade.  The reduction in trade volume going through the Suez Canal has affected revenues by more than 60 to 70 percent on average for the Suez Canal, which would represent between 4 and a half to , $5 billion of loss in revenues.  For Jordan, the impact is mainly on tourism, which is not the case for Egypt.  Those are the two main countries affected.  Syria of course, is affected, but we have very little information on that.  This second group of partially affected countries, authorities have already started to take actions to protect their economies against that.  And we have the indirectly affected countries.  And here we have to look at the channels of transmission.  Trade is one.  The other one is the impact on tourism.  The impact on oil and gas has been relatively muted so far, except high volatility in the short term.  We did not see a major impact on the oil and gas sector yet.  I think one has to recognize that it’s a highly uncertain moment and therefore things are changing constantly and we are ourselves updating regularly our assessment of the situation.  Our numbers, for example, for the outlook do not report the latest development in the last months or so and therefore we will be updating our numbers.  This high level of uncertainty is affecting countries with vulnerabilities.  And this is where the Fund is in fact acting in providing support to countries in order to help them go through these severe shocks. 

    MS. AL SHAMI: Thank you, Jihad.  We’ll go for another round of questions.  Maybe we’ll go to the first gentleman in the first row, please. 

    QUESTIONER:  Many Arab countries have taken on significant debt to fund infrastructure and economic reforms.  What the strategies does the IMF recommend for managing the tracing debt levels, particularly for non-oil economies and taking into consideration what’s happening in the region with all the conflicts. 

    MS. AL SHAMI: Thank you.  We have another question that we received that’s also on debt.  What are the projections of the Fund concerning the region’s debt levels amid the ongoing regional tensions? 

    MR. AZOUR: Thank you for your questions.  Well, of course the high level of debt has been one of the main issues that several economies in the region, especially the middle income and the emerging economies of the region are facing.  And here I would address the issue in three levels.  The level of debt that constitute a major macroeconomic stability issue.  And we recommend countries to address this by having an inclusive but sustained fiscal consolidations in order to reduce the risk level, in order to strengthen their capacity to raise revenues and reduce the overall macroeconomic risk.  And when the Fund is asked, the Fund is providing support to many countries on that front. 

              The second dimension is the financing dimension.  The overall financing need for this year are going to be around $286 billion, almost $6 billion higher for the whole region in terms of financing need.  Compared to last year, this include not only, I would say all importing middle income countries, but the whole region and therefore securing enough financing is another issue.  And the third one that is becoming a challenging issue that requires a combination of measures is the cost of debt service.  The cost of debt service because of the increase in interest rate has become one of the main, I would say, fiscal issue that countries are facing. 

              The last point, I would add, is the fact that recently we were witnessing a greater reliance on local markets when it comes to financing the local debt.  Therefore, the nexus between the governor, the government and the market and the local market has increased.  And this is why it’s important to have a clear medium term reform agenda in order to reduce the weight of the debt, to improve fiscal space, but also to provide more comfort to investors to broaden the finance space.

    MS. AL SHAMI: Thank you, Jihad.  We’ll turn now to the online questions, and we have Fatima Ibrahim.  Fatima, if you’re online, you can come in.  Okay.  Otherwise we’ll take some questions from the floor.  We’ll start maybe with the gentleman in the middle.  Yeah. 

    QUESTIONER:  Good morning, this is Adil from Daily Business Recorder, Pakistan.  Thank you for taking my question.  So the World Economic Outlook projects Pakistan’s growth rate at a higher rate compared to last year, 3.2 percent.  The modest growth of 2.4 percent last year was predominantly driven by the agriculture sector, which had its best performance in the last two decades, right.  The services sector also benefited from agriculture success while the manufacturing was negative.  The agriculture sector faces significant downside risks this time.  While manufacturing is also highly constrained by high energy tariffs and weak demand locally.  Do you think a higher growth rate can be achieved without fiscal expansion the way Pakistan has primed the pump in the past after securing an IMF program?  Or do you think it can happen sustainably?  Thank you. 

    MS. AL SHAMI: Thank you.  Any other questions on Pakistan before we — any other questions on Pakistan?  Okay. 

    MR. AZOUR: Thank you very much.  Yes, the projections are showing that the Pakistani economy will grow at 2.4 percent this year compared to minus 0.2 percent last year and expected for next year to grow at 3.2 percent.  This constitutes an improvement at a time where we are seeing also inflation going down from 29 percent last year to 12.6 percent this year and we expect inflation to go down to 10.6 percent next year. 

              Of course, the reform package that the government of Pakistan has put together has several objectives.  One is to achieve fiscal sustainability by addressing some of the long awaited fiscal issues, especially on increasing the share of revenues in order to reduce the deficit, but also to improve the quality of the revenues by addressing some of the issues that existed in terms of tax collection and also in terms of special regimes.  Reforming the SOEs is also an important priority that will increase the capacity of Pakistan to provide a greater space for the private sector, level the playing field and increase FDIs by doing so.  This will allow the Pakistani economy to be more export driven and also to be ready to attract additional investment. 

              The monetary policy is also helping by tackling the issue of inflation and also by reducing any construction constraints on capital flows as well as also on the exchange transfers which also with the broad context of reforms will allow additional predictability and will reduce the risks or the constraints on the current account.  Therefore, the package of reform that has been set has not only the ambition to strengthen stability in terms of macroeconomic stability and reduced financing risks, but also has the ambition to reform some of the key sectors including the energy and the SOEs, improve the business environment, attract more FDRs and allow the economy to be more export driven which will unleash the potential of the Pakistani economy without having an impact on the current account. 

    MS. AL SHAMI: Thank you Jihad.  We’ll turn now online.   I’m going to read your questions because I have them here.  Two questions on Egypt.  Question is regarding negotiations that Egypt will start with the IMF regarding the timing of implementing the economic reforms.  Does the IMF see that any of these can be delayed?  And the second point how does the IMF see the situation of the Egyptian economy in light of the recent developments?  And have you tested that during  your projections regarding growth and energy prices? 

              If those that want to ask on Egypt we’ll start here — many hands.  Yes, the gentleman here. 

    QUESTIONER:  I will speak in Arabic.   It’s a technical point, Mr. Jihad.  I wanted to ask you about the policies of the Fund that they aim at improving the living standards of the citizens and to reach the most vulnerable population.  And during the negotiations, some of those negotiations they contradict with these principles I mean increasing the price of energy.  I mean again for floating the price of the pound and adjustment of some prices of the commodities such as power.  And this is part of the reform program.  Does this apply to the current situation in Egypt in general?  Whether I speak about improving the standards of living especially as these put more pressures on the vulnerable population. 

    MS. AL SHAMI: Please any other questions?  We’ll take the gentleman please be brief so we can take other questions. 

    QUESTIONER:  My question like Mrs. Georgieva said today that she’s going to visit Egypt in like within 10 days for like discussing the maybe reassessment in the program and that came in context with President he said that the economic situation it might lead Egypt to like rethinking about the reform program with the IMF.  Can you highlight in which points might like Mrs. Georgieva is going to discuss?  Are you going to change the program?  Are you going to change your condition for reforming program or it’s just going to be trying to convince Egyptian regime that the reform program that you have already agreed is going as usual and as you see like this came in contact with my colleague from Egypt about suffering of increasing price for gas and many other goods and stuff in Egypt.  So like what’s going on exactly in this meeting between Ms. Georgieva and President Sisi  Thank you. 

    MS. AL SHAMI: Thank you.  We’ll take one last question on Egypt and then we’ll move on the second, third row please. 

    QUESTIONER:    My question is, is there any possibility of increasing the size of Egypt’s long given the widening of the conflict in the Middle east in recent weeks?  Thank you. 

    MS. AL SHAMI: We’ll turn to you Jihad. 

    MR. AZOUR: Okay.  In fact there are three levels of the different questions.  One is on the economic situation in Egypt.  The second is on the program and the relationship between the Fund and Egypt and also on some of the specific measures.  Well, first of all, and I will answer part in Arabic and part in English for the question that came from the online audience.  Like other countries in the region, Egypt has been subjected to the impact of the increase in tension due to the conflict.  I mentioned earlier, Egypt is a country that is partially affected and mainly the impact was on the revenues from the Suez Canal.  Luckily, the impact on tourism was almost muted.  We did not see any drop for a sector that employs a large part of the population.  Therefore, there are two levels of impact.  The direct impact of the conflict and the high level of uncertainty that affects Egypt as much as affect other countries in the region, especially in terms of attracting direct investment and attracting inflows. 

              On the other side, there are certain number of internal issues that the authorities are dealing with.  The high level of inflation is one.  Inflation has reached last year35 percent and it’s important if we want to preserve the purchasing power of the people, especially the low- and middle-income people, is to address inflation.  The best way to protect the livelihood of people is by reducing the level of price increase.  Therefore, the first pillar of the program was to strengthen stability and also protect the economy from external shocks.  This economy has been subjected to external shocks over the last four years Covid and then the war in Ukraine and then the recent conflict in the region.  And this is where the importance, for example of the flexibility of the exchange rate.  The flexibility of the exchange rate will reduce the impact of external shocks that could destabilize the local economy, would give more predictability in terms of capital flows and will reduce the risk of using other type of measures that would have an impact on economic activity. 

              Therefore, it’s very important to preserve it because it’s the best way to reduce the impact of external shocks on the local economy.  Of course, it has to go hand in hand with monetary policy that works on addressing inflation.  Inflation is going down and I think this is a positive news.  We expect it next year to reach 16 percent.  Of course, there are some short term hikes when some of the measures are introduced, but those are usually short lived impact.  Therefore, monetary policy is also a priority in order to reduce the macro instability, but also reduce the pressure on the low middle income people.  Three is we need to create growth.  Also, we’re happy to see that the growth prospects for next year are improving 4 percent for the fiscal year 2025.  But I think we can do more.  How to do more is by allowing the private sector to be investing, creating jobs.  And the best way to do it is for the state to give more space to the private sector and also for the state to be, I would say allowing them the competition to take place.  And this requires to accelerate some of the reforms of the SOEs, including increasing the private sector share in those investments. 

              The program has been built based on those objectives and when shocks occurred, the Fund responded very quickly.  We have increased the size of the program from $3 billion to $8 billion in the last review that took place in April.  Taking into consideration that Egypt has been subjected to the shock of the conflict.  The other also positive element that FDIs have increased with 35, 34 billion dollars of investment from UAE.  I think this provided additional needed investment and also needed inflow.  And we hope that this investment will be one of the elements that will bring growth to Egypt.  Therefore, in terms of inflows Egypt has been receiving, in addition to what the Fund has provided, what the UAE has provided also additional financing from bilateral and multilateral institutions.  The World Bank, the EU have increased their financing to Egypt and therefore, going back to the question, should we revisit the size of the program?  I think the macroeconomic conditions today are showing that the program as it’s designed and its finance is still appropriate. 

              On the question of some of the specific.  The impact of some of the specific measures here, I think we have to differentiate between two dimensions.  There are certain measures who have impact and those need to be countered by some other measures, especially on the social front.  And we are happy to see that the various programs that exist, Takaful and Karama and other programs are activated in order to address some of these issues.  Whenever you introduce those kind of fiscal measures, you need to protect the most vulnerable.  You need to allow the mostly affected and those who have limited capacity to be protected.  And therefore, when you do so, it allows you to create fiscal buffers, especially on the revenue side, to make it fairer and more effective i.e.not to have all the tax burden on the low income or middle-income people through consumption tax to increase the progressivity in the tax system, but also on the other hand, to provide more on the social protection level the program has in it.And the Fund team is working with authorities on the way to make sure that what is in the program is sufficient enough and what needs to be done to improve the outreach of the social program.  And during the visit of the MD, this will be one of the priority issues that the MD will raise and will discuss is how effective the social protection programs are.  Therefore, I think whenever you have to address imbalances that have been there for some time, there are some consolidation.  But you want to make sure that this consolidation is growth friendly, is inclusive and also it provides sustainable economic transformation. 

              This is how the program has been designed.  It has been designed to live in a shock prone world.  It has been designed in order to allow the economy to be more geared toward growth that is driven by export and create more opportunities.  Of course the uncertainty in the region is high.  We take this into consideration and earlier I mentioned that we are constantly looking at the impact.  We’re looking also at the potential escalations and what does it mean for our countries. 

              But again, I think it’s important in the case of Egypt as well as also in Jordan.  Those programs provide an anchor of stability at a time of uncertainty.  I think there is a great value of those programs.  We saw it in Jordan with the upgrade of Jordan in terms of rating.  Those programs provide an anchor of stability, and I think what the region needs today is stability.  And this is on that premise that we are engaging with countries in the region, and we are in fact we’re ready to engage and to provide more support. 

    MS. AL SHAMI: Thank you, Jihad.  Let’s turn to the room.  Maybe we’ll go to the gentleman in the back.  Yes, right here.  Thank you. 

    QUESTIONER:  He will ask the question in Arabic.  In light of the environment in the GCC region, what are your projections for growth and specifically the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, your projections for growth? 

    MR. AZOUR: No doubt, no doubt that the GCC countries have managed over the past years to adapt to a large number of shocks and challenges that are being witnessed in the region and the whole world.  Starting from COVID pandemic and oil shocks.  And oil countries and GCC countries have maintained a certain level of growth despite the fact that there was the OPEC+ and its agreements. 

              For 2024, our projections are better than 2023.  The growth is about 1.2 percent in 2024 and will improve in 2025 to reach 4.2 percent in 25.  And this is very important if we put this in the framework of the fact that the main driving force behind the growth in the GCC countries is the development of non-oil economy.  And this is a very important element.  The development of non-oil economy was a main leverage for growth and the Gulf countries maintained a good level of growth ranging between 3 to 4 percent for non-oil growth under our investments that are aimed to develop other economic sectors in the future such as renewable energy as well as technology which contribute to increasing the capacity of these countries to increase the revenue, to diversify the sources of revenue for the economy and to adapt to the economic changes all over the world. 

              With regard to economy of Saudi Arabia, we expect that this year the growth will be 1.5 percent which is an improvement as compared to growth last year which was minus 0.2 percent.  And for next year it will be 4.6 percent for Saudi Arabia.  What has contributed to this in the first place?  The economic development, non-oil economy in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and also the production which has been improving and also the unwinding of the OPEC agreement.  And again the question. 

    MS. AL SHAMI: If not, we’ll turn to the room.  Maybe the — yes.  .  Yes, we can hear you now. 

    QUESTIONER:  Good evening.  Thank you and good evening.  Mr. Jihad, I would like to ask in Arabic my question.  What made the IMF expect that the growth will be 2.9 percent for Jordan next year compared to 2.5 percent this year.  In light of the continuing war in the Middle East.  This is first.  Second question.  The IMF in its last review has said that the revenue of Jordan have decreased, whereas other estimates would say that the revenue have increased.  How would you interpret these different estimates or different numbers?  And what can Jordan do to increase its revenues?  Thank you,Also a few questions. 

    MS. AL SHAMI: Please be brief.  Thank you. 

    QUESTIONER:  Hello, can you hear me well? 

    MS. AL SHAMI: Yes, we can hear you. 

    QUESTIONER:  Thank you for this opportunity.  First of all, to ask my questions.  I would like to ask you about the upcoming COP 29 conference which is scheduled to be held in Azerbaijan very soon.  And what are specific initiatives that the IMF plans to support during the conference to promote sustainable development? 

    MS. AL SHAMI: We lost — okay, I think we can’t hear you,  but we’ll come back.  Maybe we’ll take one in the room.  Yes, please. 

    QUESTIONER:  I’m from Kazakhstan.  So my question is, how do you evaluate the effect of the war in Ukraine on the economies of Central Asian region, specifically my country, Kazakhstan?  Because we’re located too close to Russia and my country has the same border with it, and we are tied economically. 

    MS. AL SHAMI: Thank you.  So that was a question on Kazakhstan and we had an earlier question, Azerbaijan.  You want to have one final question before we turn to you, Jihad. 

    QUESTIONER:  I have a question about the main obstacles to foreign investment in Saudi Arabia and what the authorities can do in order to improve that.  Thank you. 

    MR. AZOUR: Thank you.  The first question I think is about the economic impact in Jordan of the war.  Of course, the Jordanian economy is close to the hot area.  Jordan was affected in tourism, as I said before.  And this impact on tourism also affected the economy in Jordan.  Also trade and the Aqaba port.  The impact continues, but no doubt the uncertainty and the fluidity is very high.  However, last year and this year Jordan managed to maintain economic stability and to achieve an acceptable growth rate, 2.3.  This year we expect it to improve to 2.5 percent if the situation continues as it is and there was no more escalation in the region.  We attribute this to the measures taken by the government in the previous years in order to improve the performance of the economy and to achieve stabilization. 

              The Jordanian economy proved to be resilient despite the tensions.  The additional good factor is that inflation is low.  And the Central bank of Jordan managed to keep low inflation at 1.8 percent this year, which contributes to the easing of monetary policy. With regard to the point about the revenues, the amount of revenues, I’ll go back to you when I talk with the team.  But what I want to say is that in the past few years Jordan achieved successes in raising revenues which contributed to lower deficits and better stability, which enabled Jordan to secure the main financial needs and to keep stability and to increase investments and financial flows.  And we’ve seen this improvement at the beginning of this year in the form of the higher rating agencies rating for Jordan.

              The COP 29 the COP 29 the Fund has been an important partner to Azerbaijan for the preparation of the COP 29.  As you know, last year and before, the Fund has been extremely involved and the Fund has scaled up its support to members on the climate side by providing programs to help countries accelerate their transformation and finance long term climate priorities.  The Fund is also mainstreaming the climate issues in the surveillance and is providing a wealth of knowledge on the priorities, including for the Caucasus and Central Asia region where the Fund has recently produced a series of analytical pieces about the importance of adaptation for the region as well as also how to tackle the issue of mitigation and climate finance.  And I would encourage you and others to look at those.  Those are important pieces that will be featured during the COP 29.  Of course, we had recently during this week meetings with the authorities and the Fund is looking forward to maintain its active partnership with the authorities and play an important role in COP 29. 

              The last question was impact of the conflict between Russia and Ukraine on CCA countries and in particular on Kazakhstan.  Of course, let me say a few words on that.  Countries in the CCA in general have been able over the last four years and specifically over the last two years to protect their economies from the negative impact of the war in Ukraine and at the same time they were able to address the other risk that was coming from the increase in inflation or inflationary pressure.  When it comes to Kazakhstan, we project growth this year to be at 3.5 percent and we expect it to improve next year and reach 4.6 percent.  Of course, part of it is also due to the new investments in energy and in the new the new oil and gas fields, but also to the good performance of the non-oil sector. 

              Clearly here also the level of uncertainty is high, and we recommend countries to maintain on one hand their reform drive to preserve macroeconomic stability and on the other hand to accelerate structural reforms to regain levels of growth that would be needed in order to allow economic convergence between Central Asia and Caucasus countries with their peers to this gap to widen.  And this afternoon we will.  Sorry.  Tomorrow we will have a special session on the medium-term growth priorities, including the structural reforms.  And we will tackle some of the priorities for Kazakhstan as well as also other Central Asian countries. 

              The last question is obstacles to investment in Saudi Arabia.  This is the last question.  You want it in Arabic or English?  In Arabic.  If we look at the past few years under Vision 2030, you will see that there are some reforms that have contributed primarily to the improvement of the investment climate and to increase the growth rate outside of the government scope.  There was lower unemployment, especially among the youth, and also an increase in the participation of women.  And this has improved things despite all the volatilities and all the oil production cuts.  These reforms and investment projects that were adopted improve the size of the economy and make it more able to attract investments in the oil sector and also other like entertainment and technology. 

              In the past year there was a revisiting of the priorities, and the priority was more priority was given to technology, AI, climate.  All of this opens the door for more direct investment from abroad as in Saudi Arabia, also in the region.  Direct investment in the past 10 years was not as aspired.  There are internal reasons and also regional reasons because of the volatility and also because the global economic development reduced direct investments in the region. 

    MS. AL SHAMI: Today’s briefing.  Thank you very much all for joining us today.  Jihad, any final words on the launch? 

    MR. AZOUR: One, I would like to thank you very much again, I would like to ask you to remain tuned.  I mentioned in my opening that the volatility of the situation requires from us and the high level of uncertainty to keep ourselves updated and to keep updating you.  This afternoon we will.  Sorry.  Tomorrow afternoon we will have an interesting session that looks into not the short-term where the level of uncertainty is extremely high, but the medium-term.  What are the priorities in terms of growth?  What are the priorities also in terms of investment?  We will launch officially with the details with the tables the outlook in Dubai next week.  It will be on October 31st and then immediately also we will launch the outlook for Caucuses and Central Asia.

              Tomorrow at 3pm I would like to invite you all for an interesting session where we are going to discuss one of our key analytical chapters that has to focus on medium term growth.  With that, thank you very much.  I’m sure there are follow up questions.  Myself and the team who is here will be ready to provide you with additional answers to your questions. 

    MS. AL SHAMI: Thank you all.  Thank you very much. 

    *  *  *  *  *

    IMF Communications Department
    MEDIA RELATIONS

    PRESS OFFICER: Angham Al Shami

    Phone: +1 202 623-7100Email: MEDIA@IMF.org

    @IMFSpokesperson

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Highlights – INTA Delegation to the UK to exchange on EU-UK economic and trade relations – Committee on International Trade

    Source: European Parliament

    A delegation of six Members of the Committee on International Trade (INTA), accompanied by the Chair of the Delegation to the EU-UK Parliamentary Partnership Assembly, will travel to London (UK) from 28 to 30 October 2024. The delegation, led by the INTA Chair, Bernd Lange (S&D, DE), will exchange with the UK government, parliamentarians and stakeholders on the trade aspects of the EU-UK Withdrawal Agreement, including the Windsor Framework, and the Trade and Cooperation Agreement.

    The context of this visit is the ‘reset’ of the EU-UK relations announced recently by the UK Prime Minister, the first review of the TCA due in 2026 and the upcoming democratic consent vote of the Northern Ireland Legislative Assembly on the continuation of the application of major provisions of the Windsor Framework in December 2024.

    The UK and the EU are also faced with the same challenges at global level regarding international trade. In the past decade, geopolitical and geoeconomic tensions have heightened, in part due to the strategic competition between the United States and China. In the last few years the situation has deteriorated further, notably due to the supply chain disruptions from the Covid-19 pandemic and to the impact of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, as well as recently the major crisis in the Middle East, bringing both competitiveness and economic security to the forefront.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI: First Bank Announces Third Quarter 2024 Net Income of $8.2 Million

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Results reflect strong loan and deposit growth, solid asset quality, and balance sheet optimization initiatives

    HAMILTON, N.J., Oct. 23, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — First Bank (Nasdaq Global Market: FRBA) (the Bank) today announced results for the third quarter of 2024. Net income for the third quarter of 2024 was $8.2 million, or $0.32 per diluted share. Return on average assets, return on average equity and return on average tangible equity[i] for the third quarter of 2024 were 0.88%, 8.15% and 9.42%, respectively. The Bank recorded a net loss of $1.3 million, or a loss of $0.05 per diluted share, and losses on average assets, equity, and tangible equityi of 0.14%, 1.43%, and 1.66%, respectively, for the third quarter of 2023. Financial results for the third quarter of 2023 were negatively impacted by the Malvern Bancorp acquisition, completed in July 2023, primarily due to the merger-related expenses and the initial credit loss expense on acquired loans.

    Third Quarter 2024 Performance Highlights:

    • Total loans of $3.09 billion at September 30, 2024 grew $89.5 million, or 11.9%, annualized, from the linked quarter ended June 30, 2024. Loan growth occurred late in the quarter, which is reflected in average loan balance increase of only $12.2 million during the quarter ended September 30, 2024. The growth was primarily driven by $56.9 million expansion within the Commercial and Industrial and Owner-occupied commercial real estate loan categories.
    • Total deposits of $3.05 billion at September 30, 2024 grew $82.4 million, or 11.1%, annualized, from the linked quarter. Growth occurred across all deposit categories, as non-interest bearing demand, interest bearing demand, money market and savings, and time deposits increased $19.3 million, $23.3 million, $36.3 million, and $3.6 million, respectively, from the second quarter of 2024.
    • Tangible book value per share[ii] grew to $13.84 at September 30, 2024, increasing 11.2%, annualized, from $13.46 at June 30, 2024.
    • The Bank continued to prioritize balance sheet efficiency, selling approximately $11.7 million of investment securities during the quarter ended September 30, 2024 which resulted in a $555,000 net loss on the sale of investments during the quarter. The Bank also completed a restructuring of its bank-owned life insurance (BOLI) portfolio during the quarter which resulted in approximately $24 million in terminated policies and the acquisition of approximately $20 million in new policies. As a result of the restructure, the Bank recorded a $1.1 million enhancement to the cash surrender value and recognized additional income tax expense totaling $1.2 million.
    • Strong asset quality continued, with nonperforming assets decreasing by 9 basis points to 0.47% of total assets at September 30, 2024 from 0.56% at June 30, 2024.

    Patrick L. Ryan, President and CEO of First Bank, reflected on the Bank’s performance, stating, “First Bank’s outstanding third quarter growth is an outcome of a well-executed long-term strategy. We have worked to build teams, products, and operating structures that promote quality growth over the long term, and the results are evident. Our teams added high-quality loans and deposits across all categories. We also continued to optimize the Bank’s efficiency as our efficiency ratio[iii] remained below 60% for the 21st consecutive quarter. We continued to enact strategies to enhance future profitability and complement our organic growth efforts including ongoing balance sheet restructuring through the sale of certain lower-yielding investment securities, and we opportunistically restructured our BOLI policies during the quarter, an initiative that will be accretive to future earnings. The current quarter highlighted our efforts to build our core community banking customer base while we expand our specialty banking teams and continued investment in technology to improve the customer experience.”   

    Mr. Ryan added, “We are pleased with our ability to generate solid returns for our shareholders, including this quarter’s 11% annualized growth in tangible book value per share. We continue to explore a variety of opportunities to drive future earnings. Our recent receipt of regulatory approval to initiate stock repurchases also adds to our toolkit of options to support continued and growing returns for our shareholders.”

    Income Statement

    In the third quarter of 2024, the Bank’s net interest income increased to $30.1 million, growing $1.5 million, or 5.2%, compared to the same period in 2023. The increase was primarily due to net interest margin expansion in the third quarter of 2024 compared to the third quarter of 2023. Net interest income decreased $446,000, or 1.5%, from the linked second quarter of 2024. The modest decrease was primarily due to net interest margin compression and the timing of our loan growth, which occurred late in the third quarter, limiting interest income received during the quarter. During the third quarter, a $606,000 increase in interest income compared to the second quarter of 2024 was primarily related to higher earning asset balances, which was offset by a $1.1 million increase in interest expense, resulting from increased deposit costs and a higher level of average borrowings.

    The Bank’s tax equivalent net interest margin of 3.49% for the third quarter of 2024 represented an increase of 13 basis points from the quarter ended September 30, 2023 and a decrease of 13 basis points from the linked quarter ended June 30, 2024. The Bank’s tax equivalent net interest margin includes the impact of amortization and accretion of premiums and discounts from fair value measurements of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in acquisitions. Amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts from fair value measurements of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in acquisitions totaled $3.4 million during the third quarter of 2024, compared to $2.7 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2023 and $3.6 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2024. The Bank’s net interest margin declined compared to the linked second quarter due to lower acquisition accounting accretion income, increased levels of average borrowings, lower average loan yields, and higher interest bearing deposit costs.

    The Bank recorded a credit loss expense totaling $1.6 million during the third quarter of 2024, compared to $63,000 recorded during the second quarter of 2024 and $6.7 million recorded for the third quarter of 2023. The Bank’s credit loss expense for the third quarter of 2024 was commensurate with robust organic loan growth during the quarter and continued to reflect strong and stable asset quality. Credit loss expense for the third quarter of 2023 included a $5.5 million credit loss recorded to establish the allowance for credit losses on the acquired Malvern loan portfolio.

    In the third quarter of 2024, the Bank recorded non-interest income of $2.5 million, compared to $193,000 during the same period in 2023 and $689,000 in the second quarter of 2024. The increase in non-interest income was primarily related to approximately $1.1 million in one-time enhancement to the cash surrender value of BOLI that resulted from the aforementioned BOLI restructuring transaction during the quarter, as well as higher yields earned on the new BOLI policies purchased during the quarter. Additionally, the Bank recorded $135,000 in net gains on the sale of loans during third quarter 2024, compared to net losses on the sale of loans totaling $900,000 and $704,000 in the linked and prior year quarters, respectively. This was partially offset by $555,000 in net losses on the sale of investment securities during third quarter 2024, while no investment securities sales were executed in the linked quarter, and $527,000 in net losses were recognized during the third quarter of 2023.

    Non-interest expense for the third quarter of 2024 was $18.6 million, a decrease of $4.8 million, or 20.6%, compared to $23.4 million for the prior year quarter. Lower non-interest expense was largely due to $7.0 million in merger-related expenses recorded during the third quarter of 2023. Excluding merger-related expenses, non-interest expense grew $2.2 million, or 13.3%, including an increase of $849,000 in salaries and employee benefits due to merit increases and a larger employee base. Other real estate owned (OREO) expense totaled $662,000 during third quarter 2024, with no similar expense recorded in third quarter 2023. The increase reflects a $363,000 impairment of an OREO asset along with other legal and real estate tax expenses recorded during the quarter. Additionally, other professional fees increased $312,000 primarily related to increases in personnel placement costs, consulting fees, and tax services.

    On a linked quarter basis, non-interest expense increased $691,000, or 3.8%, from $18.0 million for the second quarter of 2024. The largest impact on expenses compared to the linked quarter is the aforementioned $363,000 OREO impairment expense during third quarter 2024. Salaries and employee benefits expense increased by $207,000 primarily due to a larger employee base. These were partially offset by modest decreases in marketing and advertising costs, as well as travel and entertainment expenses.

    Income tax expense for the three months ended September 30, 2024 was $4.2 million with an effective tax rate of 33.9%, compared to an income tax benefit of $78,000 for the third quarter of 2023 and an income tax expense of $2.1 million with an effective tax rate of 16.2% for the second quarter of 2024. The effective tax rate for the third quarter of 2024 included approximately $1.2 million of tax expense recorded related to the BOLI restructuring. Excluding this impact, the effective tax rate would have been approximately 24% for the third quarter of 2024. The effective tax rate for the second quarter of 2024 was lower compared to the first quarter due to the recently enacted New Jersey Corporate Transit Fee, which resulted in a change in tax rate and a revaluation of the Bank’s deferred tax assets. A tax benefit of $1.1 million was booked as a discrete item in the second quarter for this change in tax rate.  With the expected negative ongoing impact of the New Jersey Corporate Transit Fee, we anticipate our future effective tax rate will range between 24% and 25%.

    Balance Sheet

    Total assets increased $148.3 million, or 4.1%, from December 31, 2023 to September 30, 2024. Total loans increased $66.0 million, or 2.2%, from December 31, 2023 to September 30, 2024. Growth totaling $116.3 million across the owner-occupied commercial real estate and commercial and industrial loan portfolios was partially offset by a decline of commercial investor real estate loans totaling $47.8 million, including multi-family and construction and development, during the first nine months of 2024. The Bank continues to prioritize relationship-based commercial and industrial lending while actively managing our exposure in investor real estate lending.

    Total assets grew $141.9 million, or 15.6% annualized, during the quarter ended September 30, 2024. Growth included an increase of $71.5 million in cash and cash equivalents related to the opportunistic addition of FHLB advances when interest rates declined during the quarter. Total loans increased by $89.5 million, or 11.9%, annualized, during the quarter ended September 30, 2024. Growth across the owner-occupied commercial real estate and commercial and industrial loan portfolios totaled $56.9 million, while commercial investor real estate loans, including multi-family and construction and development, grew $27.5 million, and consumer and residential real estate loans grew $5.2 million.

    Total deposits increased by $82.4 million, or 11.1% annualized, during the quarter ended September 30, 2024. Growth occurred across all categories, with non-interest bearing demand, interest bearing demand, money market and savings, and time deposits increasing $19.3 million, $23.3 million, $36.3 million, and $3.6 million, respectively, from the second quarter of 2024. Our team continued to focus on attracting new deposit relationships while maintaining existing core balances.

    Nearly all of the Bank’s deposit growth for the first nine months of 2024 occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2024. We also experienced a slight shift in the mix of customer balances over the nine-month period. The Bank grew non-interest bearing demand deposits by $17.3 million in a challenging interest rate environment, while total interest-bearing deposits experienced a shift toward higher-costing deposits. During the first nine months of 2024, increases in money market and savings deposits and time deposits totaled $64.2 million and $32.3 million, respectively, partially offset by a decline in interest bearing demand deposits totaling $31.3 million.

    During the nine months ended September 30, 2024, stockholders’ equity increased by $31.2 million, primarily due to net income, partially offset by dividends.

    As of September 30, 2024, the Bank continued to exceed all regulatory capital requirements to be considered well-capitalized, with a Tier 1 Leverage ratio of 9.53%, a Tier 1 Risk-Based capital ratio of 9.65%, a Common Equity Tier 1 Capital ratio of 9.65%, and a Total Risk-Based capital ratio of 11.55%. The tangible stockholders’ equity to tangible assets ratio[IV] increased to 9.41% as of September 30, 2024 compared to 8.89% at December 31, 2023.

    Asset Quality

    First Bank’s asset quality metrics for the third quarter of 2024 remained favorable. Total nonperforming loans declined from $25.0 million at December 31, 2023 to $12.0 million at September 30, 2024, while total nonperforming assets declined from $25.0 million to $17.7 million during the same period. 

    The Bank recorded net charge-offs of $386,000 during the third quarter of 2024, compared to net charge-offs of $175,000 during the second quarter of 2024 and net charge-offs of $1.1 million in the third quarter of 2023. The allowance for credit losses on loans as a percentage of total loans measured 1.21% at September 30, 2024, compared to 1.21% at June 30, 2024 and 1.40% at December 31, 2023.  The decline from December 31, 2023 to September 30, 2024 reflected the $5.5 million charge-off and elimination of the Bank’s reserves on a purchase credit deteriorated loan transferred to OREO during the first quarter of 2024.

    Liquidity and Borrowings

    The Bank increased its liquidity position in the third quarter of 2024. Total cash and cash equivalents increased by $71.5 million to $312.3 million at September 30, 2024. Borrowings increased by $49.9 million compared to June 30, 2024, as the Bank increased its FHLB borrowings.

    Management believes the Bank’s current liquidity position, coupled with our various contingent funding sources, provides us with a strong liquidity base and a diverse source of funding options.    

    Cash Dividend Declared

    On October 15, 2024, the Bank’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.06 per share to common stockholders of record at the close of business on November 8, 2024, payable on November 22, 2024.

    Share Repurchase Program

    The Board of Directors has authorized and the Bank has received regulatory approvals for a new share repurchase program. The program provides for the repurchase of up to 1.0 million shares of First Bank common stock for an aggregate repurchase amount of up to $16.0 million. The timing, price and volume of repurchases will be based on market conditions, relevant securities laws and other factors. The stock repurchases may be made from time to time on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. The stock repurchase program does not require First Bank to repurchase any specific number of shares, and First Bank may terminate the repurchase program at any time. The share repurchase program will expire on September 30, 2025.

    Conference Call and Earnings Release Supplement

    Additional details on the quarterly results and the Bank are included in the attached earnings release supplement. http://ml.globenewswire.com/Resource/Download/8c344bfa-6975-4f79-872b-2307433b1520

    First Bank will host its earnings call on Thursday, October 24, 2024 at 9:00 AM Eastern Time. The direct dial toll free number for the live call is 1-800-715-9871 and the access code is 1578641. For those unable to participate in the call, a replay will be available by dialing 1-800-770-2030 (access code 8550862) from one hour after the end of the conference call until January 22, 2025. Replay information will also be available on First Bank’s website at www.firstbanknj.com under the “About Us” tab. Click on “Investor Relations” to access the replay of the conference call.

    About First Bank

    First Bank is a New Jersey state-chartered bank with 26 full-service branches in Cinnaminson, Delanco, Denville, Ewing, Fairfield, Flemington (2), Hamilton, Lawrence, Monroe, Morristown, Pennington, Randolph, Somerset and Williamstown, New Jersey; and Coventry, Devon, Doylestown, Glenn Mills, Lionville, Malvern, Paoli, Trevose, Warminster and West Chester, Pennsylvania; and Palm Beach, Florida. With $3.76 billion in assets as of September 30, 2024, First Bank offers a full range of deposit and loan products to individuals and businesses throughout the New York City to Philadelphia corridor. First Bank’s common stock is listed on the Nasdaq Global Market under the symbol “FRBA.”

    Forward Looking Statements

    This press release contains certain forward-looking statements, either express or implied, within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements include information regarding First Bank’s future financial performance, business and growth strategy, projected plans and objectives, and related transactions, integration of acquired businesses, ability to recognize anticipated operational efficiencies, and other projections based on macroeconomic and industry trends, which are inherently unreliable due to the multiple factors that impact economic trends, and any such variations may be material. Such forward-looking statements are based on various facts and derived utilizing important assumptions, current expectations, estimates and projections about First Bank, any of which may change over time and some of which may be beyond First Bank’s control. Statements preceded by, followed by or that otherwise include the words “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “projects,” “estimates,” “plans” and similar expressions or future or conditional verbs such as “will,” “should,” “would,” “may” and “could” are generally forward-looking in nature and not historical facts, although not all forward-looking statements include the foregoing. Further, certain factors that could affect our future results and cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to: changes in market interest rates on funding costs, yield on interest earning assets, credit quality and strength of underlying collateral and the effect of such changes on the market value of First Bank’s investment securities portfolio; whether First Bank can: successfully implement its growth strategy, including identifying acquisition targets and consummating suitable acquisitions, integrate acquired entities and realize anticipated efficiencies, sustain its internal growth rate, and provide competitive products and services that appeal to its customers and target markets; difficult market conditions and unfavorable economic trends in the United States generally, and particularly in the market areas in which First Bank operates and in which its loans are concentrated, including the effects of declines in housing market values; the effects of the recent turmoil in the banking industry (including the failures of two financial institutions in early 2023); the impact of public health emergencies, such as COVID-19, on First Bank, its operations and its customers and employees; an increase in unemployment levels and slowdowns in economic growth; First Bank’s level of nonperforming assets and the costs associated with resolving any problem loans including litigation and other costs; the extensive federal and state regulation, supervision and examination governing almost every aspect of First Bank’s operations, including changes in regulations affecting financial institutions and expenses associated with complying with such regulations; uncertainties in tax estimates and valuations, including due to changes in state and federal tax law; First Bank’s ability to comply with applicable capital and liquidity requirements, including First Bank’s ability to generate liquidity internally or raise capital on favorable terms, including continued access to the debt and equity capital markets; and possible changes in trade, monetary and fiscal policies, laws and regulations and other activities of governments, agencies, and similar organizations. For discussion of these and other risks that may cause actual results to differ from expectations, please refer to “Forward-Looking Statements” and “Risk Factors” in First Bank’s Annual Report on Form 10-K and any updates to those risk factors set forth in First Bank’s proxy statement, subsequent Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q or Current Reports on Form 8-K. If one or more events related to these or other risks or uncertainties materialize, or if First Bank’s underlying assumptions prove to be incorrect, actual results may differ materially from what First Bank anticipates. Accordingly, you should not place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which it is made, and First Bank does not undertake any obligation to publicly update or review any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise. All forward-looking statements, expressed or implied, included in this communication are expressly qualified in their entirety by this cautionary statement. This cautionary statement should also be considered in connection with any subsequent written or oral forward-looking statements that First Bank or persons acting on First Bank’s behalf may issue.

    _____________

    i Return on average tangible equity is a non-U.S. GAAP financial measure and is calculated by dividing net income by average tangible equity (average equity minus average goodwill and other intangible assets).  For a reconciliation of this non-U.S. GAAP financial measure, along with the other non-U.S. GAAP financial measures in this press release, to their comparable U.S. GAAP measures, see the financial reconciliations at the end of this press release.

    ii Tangible book value per share is a non-U.S. GAAP financial measure and is calculated by dividing common shares outstanding by tangible equity (equity minus goodwill and other intangible assets).  For a reconciliation of this non-U.S. GAAP financial measure, along with the other non-U.S. GAAP financial measures in this press release, to their comparable U.S. GAAP measures, see the financial reconciliations at the end of this press release.

    iii The efficiency ratio is a non-U.S. GAAP financial measure and is calculated by dividing non-interest expense less merger-related expenses by adjusted total revenue (net interest income plus non-interest income).  For a reconciliation of this non-U.S. GAAP financial measure, along with the other non-U.S. GAAP financial measures in this press release, to their comparable U.S. GAAP measures, see the financial reconciliations at the end of this press release.

    iv Tangible stockholders’ equity to tangible assets ratio is a non-U.S. GAAP financial measure and is calculated by dividing tangible equity (equity minus goodwill and other intangible assets) by tangible assets (total assets minus goodwill and other intangible assets).  For a reconciliation of this non-U.S. GAAP financial measure, along with the other non-U.S. GAAP financial measures in this press release, to their comparable U.S. GAAP measures, see the financial reconciliations at the end of this press release.

    FIRST BANK
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
    (in thousands, except for share data, unaudited)
     
      September 30,
    2024
      December 31,
    2023
    Assets          
    Cash and due from banks $ 35,456     $ 25,652  
    Restricted cash   9,200       13,770  
    Interest bearing deposits with banks   267,643       188,529  
    Cash and cash equivalents   312,299       227,951  
    Interest bearing time deposits with banks   743       996  
    Investment securities available for sale, at fair value   74,549       94,142  
    Investment securities held to maturity, net of allowance for credit losses of $206 at September 30, 2024 and $200 at December 31, 2023 (fair value of $39,049 and $38,486 at September 30, 2024 and December 31, 2023, respectively)   43,659       44,059  
    Equity securities, at fair value   1,860       1,888  
    Restricted investment in bank stocks   13,845       10,469  
    Other investments   11,141       9,841  
    Loans, net of deferred fees and costs   3,087,488       3,021,501  
    Less: Allowance for credit losses   (37,434 )     (42,397 )
    Net loans   3,050,054       2,979,104  
    Premises and equipment, net   20,331       21,627  
    Other real estate owned, net   5,637        
    Accrued interest receivable   13,502       14,763  
    Bank-owned life insurance   84,727       86,435  
    Goodwill   44,166       44,166  
    Other intangible assets, net   9,318       10,812  
    Deferred income taxes, net   31,448       30,875  
    Other assets   40,374       32,199  
    Total assets $ 3,757,653     $ 3,609,327  
               
    Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity          
    Liabilities:          
    Non-interest bearing deposits $ 519,079     $ 501,763  
    Interest bearing deposits   2,530,991       2,465,806  
    Total deposits   3,050,070       2,967,569  
    Borrowings   236,999       179,140  
    Subordinated debentures   29,926       55,261  
    Accrued interest payable   5,078       2,813  
    Other liabilities   33,510       33,644  
    Total liabilities   3,355,583       3,238,427  
    Stockholders’ Equity:          
    Preferred stock, par value $2 per share; 10,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding          
    Common stock, par value $5 per share; 40,000,000 shares authorized; 27,367,984 shares issued and 25,186,920 shares outstanding at September 30, 2024 and 27,149,186 shares issued and 24,968,122 shares outstanding at December 31, 2023   135,415       134,552  
    Additional paid-in capital   124,014       122,881  
    Retained earnings   167,792       140,563  
    Accumulated other comprehensive loss   (3,773 )     (5,718 )
    Treasury stock, 2,181,064 shares at September 30, 2024 and December 31, 2023   (21,378 )     (21,378 )
    Total stockholders’ equity   402,070       370,900  
    Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $ 3,757,653     $ 3,609,327  
                   
    FIRST BANK
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (LOSS)
    (in thousands, except for share data, unaudited)
     
      Three Months Ended   Nine Months Ended
      September 30,   September 30,
      2024   2023   2024   2023
    Interest and Dividend Income                      
    Investment securities—taxable $ 1,201     $ 1,151     $ 3,661     $ 3,128  
    Investment securities—tax-exempt   35       86       109       158  
    Interest bearing deposits with banks, Federal funds sold and other   3,972       2,593       10,479       6,029  
    Loans, including fees   50,957       46,088       151,039       111,536  
    Total interest and dividend income   56,165       49,918       165,288       120,851  
                           
    Interest Expense                      
    Deposits   23,081       18,470       66,253       40,574  
    Borrowings   2,550       1,914       6,859       4,939  
    Subordinated debentures   440       940       1,224       1,821  
    Total interest expense   26,071       21,324       74,336       47,334  
    Net interest income   30,094       28,594       90,952       73,517  
    Credit loss expense   1,579       6,650       944       8,237  
    Net interest income after credit loss expense   28,515       21,944       90,008       65,280  
                           
    Non-Interest Income                      
    Service fees on deposit accounts   362       280       1,056       741  
    Loan fees   218       152       437       259  
    Income from bank-owned life insurance   1,819       544       3,213       1,291  
    Losses on sale of investment securities, net   (555 )     (527 )     (555 )     (734 )
    Gains (losses) on sale of loans, net   135       (704 )     (536 )     (393 )
    Gains on recovery of acquired loans   35       24       209       95  
    Other non-interest income   465       424       1,308       1,026  
    Total non-interest income   2,479       193       5,132       2,285  
                           
    Non-Interest Expense                      
    Salaries and employee benefits   10,175       9,326       30,181       25,320  
    Occupancy and equipment   2,080       1,915       6,188       5,107  
    Legal fees   245       270       801       671  
    Other professional fees   943       631       2,628       1,880  
    Regulatory fees   728       595       1,970       1,345  
    Directors’ fees   272       224       784       631  
    Data processing   800       907       2,355       2,206  
    Marketing and advertising   310       220       983       693  
    Travel and entertainment   233       140       762       519  
    Insurance   245       272       740       624  
    Other real estate owned expense, net   662             879       38  
    Merger-related expenses         7,028             7,710  
    Other expense   1,951       1,958       6,136       4,020  
    Total non-interest expense   18,644       23,486       54,407       50,764  
    Income Before Income Taxes   12,350       (1,349 )     40,733       16,801  
    Income tax expense   4,188       (78 )     8,986       4,284  
    Net Income (loss) $ 8,162     $ (1,271 )   $ 31,747     $ 12,517  
                           
    Basic earnings (loss) per common share $ 0.32     $ (0.05 )   $ 1.26     $ 0.60  
    Diluted earnings (loss) per common share $ 0.32     $ (0.05 )   $ 1.26     $ 0.59  
                           
    Basic weighted average common shares outstanding   25,172,927       23,902,478       25,114,685       20,928,847  
    Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding   25,342,462       23,902,478       25,265,250       21,057,655  
                                   
    FIRST BANK
    AVERAGE BALANCE SHEETS WITH INTEREST AND AVERAGE RATES
    (dollars in thousands, unaudited)
     
      Three Months Ended September 30,
      2024   2023
      Average         Average   Average         Average
      Balance   Interest   Rate(5)   Balance   Interest   Rate(5)
    Interest earning assets                                
    Investment securities (1) (2) $ 137,216     $ 1,244     3.61 %   $ 169,244     $ 1,255       2.94 %
    Loans (3)   3,010,116       50,957     6.73 %     3,003,703       46,088       6.09 %
    Interest bearing deposits with banks,                                
    Federal funds sold and other   265,474       3,593     5.38 %     182,128       2,395       5.22 %
    Restricted investment in bank stocks   12,768       257     8.01 %     10,284       196       7.56 %
    Other investments   12,776       122     3.80 %     9,162       2       0.09 %
    Total interest earning assets (2)   3,438,350       56,173     6.50 %     3,374,521       49,936       5.87 %
    Allowance for credit losses   (36,612 )               (41,216 )            
    Non-interest earning assets   271,105                 232,045              
    Total assets $ 3,672,843               $ 3,565,350              
                                     
    Interest bearing liabilities                                
    Interest bearing demand deposits $ 587,045     $ 3,974     2.69 %   $ 674,417     $ 4,038       2.38 %
    Money market deposits   1,064,045       10,573     3.95 %     952,042       8,386       3.49 %
    Savings deposits   149,057       563     1.50 %     174,412       490       1.11 %
    Time deposits   690,723       7,902     4.55 %     655,288       5,556       3.36 %
    Total interest bearing deposits   2,490,870       23,012     3.68 %     2,456,159       18,470       2.98 %
    Borrowings   206,588       2,550     4.91 %     163,746       1,914       4.64 %
    Subordinated debentures   29,908       440     5.88 %     51,101       940       7.36 %
    Total interest bearing liabilities   2,727,366       26,002     3.79 %     2,671,006       21,324       3.17 %
    Non-interest bearing deposits   506,084                 507,866              
    Other liabilities   40,858                 33,106              
    Stockholders’ equity   398,535                 353,372              
    Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $ 3,672,843               $ 3,565,350              
    Net interest income/interest rate spread (2)         30,171     2.71 %           28,612       2.70 %
    Net interest margin (2) (4)             3.49 %                 3.36 %
    Tax equivalent adjustment (2)         (8 )               (18 )      
    Net interest income       $ 30,163               $ 28,594        
                                         

    (1) Average balance of investment securities available for sale is based on amortized cost. 
    (2) Interest and average rates are presented on a tax equivalent basis using a federal income tax rate of 21%. 
    (3) Average balances of loans include loans on nonaccrual status. 
    (4) Net interest income divided by average total interest earning assets. 
    (5) Annualized.

    FIRST BANK
    AVERAGE BALANCE SHEETS WITH INTEREST AND AVERAGE RATES
    (dollars in thousands, unaudited)
     
      Nine Months Ended September 30,
      2024   2023
      Average         Average   Average         Average
      Balance   Interest   Rate(5)   Balance   Interest   Rate(5)
    Interest earning assets                              
    Investment securities (1) (2) $ 143,528     $ 3,793     3.53 %   $ 155,128     $ 3,319     2.86 %
    Loans (3)   2,995,895       151,039     6.73 %     2,590,409       111,536     5.76 %
    Interest bearing deposits with banks,                              
    Federal funds sold and other   231,171       9,404     5.43 %     143,922       5,403     5.02 %
    Restricted investment in bank stocks   11,461       699     8.15 %     9,327       454     6.51 %
    Other investments   12,262       376     4.10 %     8,902       172     2.58 %
    Total interest earning assets (2)   3,394,317       165,311     6.51 %     2,907,688       120,884     5.56 %
    Allowance for credit losses   (37,000 )               (33,664 )          
    Non-interest earning assets   265,368                 174,246            
    Total assets $ 3,622,685               $ 3,048,270            
                                   
    Interest bearing liabilities                              
    Interest bearing demand deposits $ 599,025     $ 11,453     2.55 %   $ 445,318     $ 6,492     1.95 %
    Money market deposits   1,046,911       30,921     3.95 %     840,688       20,177     3.21 %
    Savings deposits   156,416       1,756     1.50 %     155,370       1,202     1.03 %
    Time deposits   680,194       22,054     4.33 %     586,827       12,703     2.89 %
    Total interest bearing deposits   2,482,546       66,184     3.56 %     2,028,203       40,574     2.67 %
    Borrowings   181,844       6,859     5.04 %     149,042       4,939     4.43 %
    Subordinated debentures   34,071       1,224     4.79 %     36,949       1,821     6.57 %
    Total interest bearing liabilities   2,698,461       74,267     3.68 %     2,214,194       47,334     2.86 %
    Non-interest bearing deposits   494,971                 490,211            
    Other liabilities   41,971                 29,939            
    Stockholders’ equity   387,282                 313,926            
    Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $ 3,622,685               $ 3,048,270            
    Net interest income/interest rate spread (2)         91,044     2.83 %           73,550     2.70 %
    Net interest margin (2) (4)             3.58 %               3.38 %
    Tax equivalent adjustment (2)         (23 )               (33 )    
    Net interest income       $ 91,021               $ 73,517      
                                       

    (1) Average balance of investment securities available for sale is based on amortized cost.
    (2) Interest and average rates are presented on a tax equivalent basis using a federal income tax rate of 21%.
    (3) Average balances of loans include loans on nonaccrual status.
    (4) Net interest income divided by average total interest earning assets.
    (5) Annualized.

    FIRST BANK
    QUARTERLY FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
    (in thousands, except for share and employee data, unaudited)
     
      As of or For the Quarter Ended
      9/30/2024   6/30/2024   3/31/2024   12/31/2023   9/30/2023
    EARNINGS                            
    Net interest income $ 30,094     $ 30,540     $ 30,318     $ 30,999     $ 28,594  
    Credit loss (benefit) expense   1,579       63       (698 )     (294 )     6,650  
    Non-interest income   2,479       689       1,964       (3,000 )     193  
    Non-interest expense   18,644       17,953       17,810       17,936       23,486  
    Income tax expense   4,188       2,140       2,658       1,977       (78 )
    Net income   8,162       11,073       12,512       8,380       (1,271 )
                                 
    PERFORMANCE RATIOS                            
    Return on average assets (1)   0.88 %     1.23 %     1.41 %     0.93 %     (0.14 %)
    Adjusted return on average assets (1) (2)   0.93 %     1.31 %     1.39 %     1.38 %     1.07 %
    Return on average equity (1)   8.15 %     11.52 %     13.36 %     9.06 %     (1.43 %)
    Adjusted return on average equity (1) (2)   8.56 %     12.26 %     13.17 %     13.38 %     10.75 %
    Return on average tangible equity (1) (2)   9.42 %     13.40 %     15.64 %     10.67 %     (1.66 %)
    Adjusted return on average tangible equity (1) (2)   9.89 %     14.26 %     15.41 %     15.75 %     12.50 %
    Net interest margin (1) (3)   3.49 %     3.62 %     3.64 %     3.68 %     3.36 %
    Yield on loans (1)   6.73 %     6.81 %     6.66 %     6.49 %     6.09 %
    Total cost of deposits (1)   3.05 %     3.01 %     2.83 %     2.63 %     2.47 %
    Efficiency ratio (2)   58.49 %     55.88 %     55.56 %     53.79 %     54.83 %
                                 
    SHARE DATA                            
    Common shares outstanding   25,186,920       25,144,983       25,096,449       24,968,122       24,926,919  
    Basic earnings per share $ 0.32     $ 0.44     $ 0.50     $ 0.34     $ (0.05 )
    Diluted earnings per share   0.32       0.44       0.50       0.33       (0.05 )
    Adjusted diluted earnings per share (2)   0.34       0.47       0.49       0.49       0.40  
    Book value per share   15.96       15.61       15.23       14.85       14.48  
    Tangible book value per share (2)   13.84       13.46       13.06       12.65       12.26  
                                 
    MARKET DATA                            
    Market value per share $ 15.20     $ 12.74     $ 13.74     $ 14.70     $ 10.78  
    Market value / Tangible book value   109.83 %     94.65 %     105.20 %     116.18 %     87.96 %
    Market capitalization $ 382,841     $ 320,347     $ 344,825     $ 367,031     $ 268,712  
                                 
    CAPITAL & LIQUIDITY                            
    Stockholders’ equity / assets   10.70 %     10.86 %     10.64 %     10.28 %     10.15 %
    Tangible stockholders’ equity / tangible assets (2)   9.41 %     9.50 %     9.27 %     8.89 %     8.72 %
    Loans / deposits   101.23 %     101.02 %     100.75 %     101.82 %     101.80 %
                                 
    ASSET QUALITY                            
    Net charge-offs $ 386     $ 175     $ 5,293     $ 209     $ 1,122  
    Net charge-offs (recoveries), excluding PCD loan charge-off (4)   386       175       (201 )     209       1,122  
    Nonperforming loans   12,014       14,227       17,054       24,989       24,158  
    Nonperforming assets   17,651       20,226       23,053       24,989       24,158  
    Net charge offs / average loans (1)   0.05 %     0.02 %     0.72 %     0.03 %     0.15 %
    Net charge offs (recoveries), excluding PCD loan charge-off / average loans (1) (4)   0.05 %     0.02 %     (0.03 %)     0.03 %     0.15 %
    Nonperforming loans / total loans   0.39 %     0.47 %     0.57 %     0.83 %     0.80 %
    Nonperforming assets / total assets   0.47 %     0.56 %     0.64 %     0.69 %     0.68 %
    Allowance for credit losses on loans / total loans   1.21 %     1.21 %     1.22 %     1.40 %     1.42 %
    Allowance for credit losses on loans / nonperforming loans   311.59 %     254.81 %     213.42 %     169.66 %     177.50 %
                                 
    OTHER DATA                            
    Total assets $ 3,757,653     $ 3,615,731     $ 3,591,398     $ 3,609,327     $ 3,558,426  
    Total loans   3,087,488       2,998,029       2,992,423       3,021,501       3,020,778  
    Total deposits   3,050,070       2,967,634       2,970,262       2,967,569       2,967,455  
    Total stockholders’ equity   402,070       392,489       382,254       370,900       361,037  
    Number of full-time equivalent employees   313       294       288       286       286  
                                           

    (1) Annualized.
    (2) Non-U.S. GAAP financial measure that we believe provides management and investors with information that is useful in understanding our financial performance and condition.  See accompanying table, “Non-U.S. GAAP Financial Measures,” for calculation and reconciliation.
    (3) Tax equivalent using a federal income tax rate of 21%.
    (4) Excludes $5.5 million in a PCD loan charge-off in first quarter of 2024, which was reserved for through purchase accounting marks at the time of the Malvern acquisition.

    FIRST BANK
    QUARTERLY FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
    (dollars in thousands, unaudited)
     
      As of the Quarter Ended
      9/30/2024   6/30/2024   3/31/2024   12/31/2023   9/30/2023
    LOAN COMPOSITION                            
    Commercial and industrial $ 546,541     $ 530,996     $ 508,911     $ 506,849     $ 478,120  
    Commercial real estate:                            
    Owner-occupied   688,988       647,625       625,643       612,352       607,888  
    Investor   1,170,508       1,143,954       1,172,311       1,221,702       1,269,134  
    Construction and development   193,460       190,108       184,816       186,829       168,192  
    Multi-family   267,861       270,238       279,668       271,058       275,825  
    Total commercial real estate   2,320,817       2,251,925       2,262,438       2,291,941       2,321,039  
    Residential real estate:                            
    Residential mortgage and first lien home equity loans   143,953       144,978       154,704       156,024       158,487  
    Home equity–second lien loans and revolving lines of credit   49,891       46,882       45,869       44,698       46,239  
    Total residential real estate   193,844       191,860       200,573       200,722       204,726  
    Consumer and other   29,518       26,321       23,702       25,343       20,208  
    Total loans prior to deferred loan fees and costs   3,090,720       3,001,102       2,995,624       3,024,855       3,024,093  
    Net deferred loan fees and costs   (3,232 )     (3,073 )     (3,201 )     (3,354 )     (3,315 )
    Total loans $ 3,087,488     $ 2,998,029     $ 2,992,423     $ 3,021,501     $ 3,020,778  
                                 
    LOAN MIX                            
    Commercial and industrial   17.7 %     17.7 %     17.0 %     16.8 %     15.8 %
    Commercial real estate:                            
    Owner-occupied   22.3 %     21.6 %     20.9 %     20.3 %     20.1 %
    Investor   37.9 %     38.2 %     39.2 %     40.4 %     42.0 %
    Construction and development   6.3 %     6.3 %     6.2 %     6.2 %     5.6 %
    Multi-family   8.7 %     9.0 %     9.3 %     9.0 %     9.1 %
    Total commercial real estate   75.2 %     75.1 %     75.6 %     75.9 %     76.8 %
    Residential real estate:                            
    Residential mortgage and first lien home equity loans   4.7 %     4.8 %     5.2 %     5.1 %     5.3 %
    Home equity–second lien loans and revolving lines of credit   1.6 %     1.6 %     1.5 %     1.5 %     1.5 %
    Total residential real estate   6.3 %     6.4 %     6.7 %     6.6 %     6.8 %
    Consumer and other   0.9 %     0.9 %     0.8 %     0.8 %     0.7 %
    Net deferred loan fees and costs   (0.1 %)     (0.1 %)     (0.1 %)     (0.1 %)     (0.1 %)
    Total loans   100.0 %     100.0 %     100.0 %     100.0 %     100.0 %
                                           
    FIRST BANK
    QUARTERLY FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
    (dollars in thousands, unaudited)
     
      As of the Quarter Ended
      9/30/2024   6/30/2024   3/31/2024   12/31/2023   9/30/2023
    DEPOSIT COMPOSITION                            
    Non-interest bearing demand deposits $ 519,079     $ 499,765     $ 470,749     $ 501,763     $ 493,703  
    Interest bearing demand deposits   597,802       574,515       580,864       629,110       623,338  
    Money market and savings deposits   1,235,637       1,199,382       1,219,634       1,171,440       1,228,832  
    Time deposits   697,552       693,972       699,015       665,256       621,582  
    Total Deposits $ 3,050,070     $ 2,967,634     $ 2,970,262     $ 2,967,569     $ 2,967,455  
                                 
    DEPOSIT MIX                            
    Non-interest bearing demand deposits   17.0 %     16.8 %     15.8 %     16.9 %     16.6 %
    Interest bearing demand deposits   19.6 %     19.4 %     19.6 %     21.2 %     21.0 %
    Money market and savings deposits   40.5 %     40.4 %     41.1 %     39.5 %     41.4 %
    Time deposits   22.9 %     23.4 %     23.5 %     22.4 %     21.0 %
    Total Deposits   100.0 %     100.0 %     100.0 %     100.0 %     100.0 %
                                           
    FIRST BANK
    NON-U.S. GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES
    (in thousands, except for share data, unaudited)
     
      As of or For the Quarter Ended
      9/30/2024   6/30/2024   3/31/2024   12/31/2023   9/30/2023
    Return on Average Tangible Equity                            
    Net income (numerator) $ 8,162     $ 11,073     $ 12,512     $ 8,380     $ (1,271 )
                                 
    Average stockholders’ equity $ 398,535     $ 386,644     $ 376,542     $ 366,950     $ 353,372  
    Less: Average Goodwill and other intangible assets, net   53,823       54,347       54,790       55,324       49,491  
    Average Tangible stockholders’ equity (denominator) $ 344,712     $ 332,297     $ 321,752     $ 311,626     $ 303,881  
                                 
    Return on Average Tangible equity (1)   9.42 %     13.40 %     15.64 %     10.67 %     -1.66 %
                                 
    Tangible Book Value Per Share                            
    Stockholders’ equity $ 402,070     $ 392,489     $ 382,254     $ 370,900     $ 361,037  
    Less: Goodwill and other intangible assets, net   53,484       54,026       54,483       54,978       55,554  
    Tangible stockholders’ equity (numerator) $ 348,586     $ 338,463     $ 327,771     $ 315,922     $ 305,483  
                                 
    Common shares outstanding (denominator)   25,186,920       25,144,983       25,096,449       24,968,122       24,926,919  
                                 
    Tangible book value per share $ 13.84     $ 13.46     $ 13.06     $ 12.65     $ 12.26  
                                 
    Tangible Equity / Tangible Assets                            
    Stockholders’ equity $ 402,070     $ 392,489     $ 382,254     $ 370,900     $ 361,037  
    Less: Goodwill and other intangible assets, net   53,484       54,026       54,483       54,978       55,554  
    Tangible stockholders’ equity (numerator) $ 348,586     $ 338,463     $ 327,771     $ 315,922     $ 305,483  
                                 
    Total assets $ 3,757,653     $ 3,615,731     $ 3,591,398     $ 3,609,327     $ 3,558,426  
    Less: Goodwill and other intangible assets, net   53,484       54,026       54,483       54,978       55,554  
    Tangible total assets (denominator) $ 3,704,169     $ 3,561,705     $ 3,536,915     $ 3,554,349     $ 3,502,872  
                                 
    Tangible stockholders’ equity / tangible assets   9.41 %     9.50 %     9.27 %     8.89 %     8.72 %
                                 
    Efficiency Ratio                            
    Non-interest expense $ 18,644     $ 17,953     $ 17,810     $ 17,936     $ 23,486  
    Less: Merger-related expenses                     338       7,028  
    Adjusted non-interest expense (numerator) $ 18,644     $ 17,953     $ 17,810     $ 17,598     $ 16,458  
                                 
    Net interest income $ 30,094     $ 30,540     $ 30,318     $ 30,999     $ 28,594  
    Non-interest income   2,479       689       1,964       (3,000 )     193  
    Total revenue   32,573       31,229       32,282       27,999       28,787  
    Add: Losses on sale of investment securities, net   555                   916       527  
    (Subtract) Add: (Gains) losses on sale of loans, net   (135 )     900       (229 )     3,799       704  
    Less: Bank Owned Life Insurance Enhancement   (1,116 )                        
    Adjusted total revenue (denominator) $ 31,877     $ 32,129     $ 32,053     $ 32,714     $ 30,018  
                                 
    Efficiency ratio   58.49 %     55.88 %     55.56 %     53.79 %     54.83 %
                                           

    (1) Annualized.

    FIRST BANK
    NON-U.S. GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES
    (dollars in thousands, except for share data, unaudited)
     
      For the Quarter Ended
      9/30/2024   6/30/2024   3/31/2024   12/31/2023   9/30/2023
                                 
    Adjusted diluted earnings per share,                            
    Adjusted return on average assets, and                            
    Adjusted return on average equity                            
                                 
    Net income $ 8,162     $ 11,073     $ 12,512     $ 8,380     $ (1,271 )
    Add: Merger-related expenses(1)                     267       5,552  
    Add: Credit loss expense on acquired loan portfolio(1)                           4,323  
    Add (subtract): Losses (gains) on sale of loans, net(1)   (107 )     711       (181 )     3,001       556  
    Add: Losses on sale of investment securities, net(1)   438                   724       416  
    Add: Net Impact of Bank Owned Life Insurance Restructuring(2)   79                          
    Adjusted net income $ 8,572     $ 11,784     $ 12,331     $ 12,372     $ 9,576  
                                 
    Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding   25,342,462       25,258,785       25,199,381       25,089,495       24,029,910  
    Average assets $ 3,672,843     $ 3,618,912     $ 3,575,748     $ 3,561,261     $ 3,565,350  
    Average equity $ 398,535     $ 386,644     $ 376,542     $ 366,950     $ 353,372  
    Average Tangible Equity $ 344,712     $ 332,297     $ 321,752     $ 311,626     $ 303,881  
                                 
    Adjusted diluted earnings per share $ 0.34     $ 0.47     $ 0.49     $ 0.49     $ 0.40  
    Adjusted return on average assets(3)   0.93 %     1.31 %     1.39 %     1.38 %     1.07 %
    Adjusted return on average equity(3)   8.56 %     12.26 %     13.17 %     13.38 %     10.75 %
    Adjusted return on average tangible equity(3)   9.89 %     14.26 %     15.41 %     15.75 %     12.50 %
                                           

    (1) Items are tax-effected using a federal income tax rate of 21%.
    (2) Includes the net impact of the new Bank Owned Life Insurance enhancement and the increased tax expense on the terminated policies.
    (3) Annualized.

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Banking: Charting the course: prudential regulation and supervision for smooth sailing

    Source: Bank for International Settlements

    Introduction

    Good afternoon, and thank you for inviting me to speak at this conference today.

    It is a privilege to be speaking today as the Chair of the Basel Committee, following my appointment by the Group of Governors and Heads of Supervision (GHOS) in May of this year.1 This is a position that has been previously enjoyed by only 11 people during the Committee’s 50 years. As a Reserve Officer in the Royal Swedish Navy, I would liken this honour as akin to taking the helm of a well steered vessel by seasoned captains. 

    As you know, the work of the Basel Committee since the Great Financial Crisis (GFC) – under the leadership of Nout Wellink, Stefan Ingves and, more recently, Pablo Hernández de Cos – has fundamentally reshaped the regulatory landscape for internationally active banks. The Basel Framework is the cornerstone of the international community’s response to the GFC. Since 2011, banks’ Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) risk-based capital ratio has increased by over 70% and now stands at around 13.8%.2 Global banking system leverage has almost halved during this period, with an average Tier 1 leverage ratio of just over 6%.3 And banks’ holdings of high-quality liquid assets have more than doubled to over €12.5 trillion, with a corresponding Liquidity Coverage Ratio of over 135%.4

    The Basel III reforms have brought tangible benefits. In sailing, no matter how skilled you are, you can’t control the weather. However, you can prepare your boat with safety protocols and solid equipment. The Committee helps ensure that the global banking system is prepared for the unexpected. There is now an extensive empirical literature that suggests that the Basel III reforms have had an unambiguously positive net macroeconomic effect.5 The reforms have clearly strengthened bank resilience at both the bank and system-wide level, which in turn will help reduce the likelihood and impact of future banking crises. At the same time, banks, particularly strongly capitalised ones, have continued to meet the demand for lending from households and businesses.6

    Just as important as the effects of Basel III is the process by which the reforms were finalised. The Committee consulted extensively when developing Basel III – we do not operate in a vacuum or opaquely. It published no fewer than 10 consultation papers, which collectively spanned a consultation period of almost three years. It engaged extensively with a wide range of external stakeholders. Each consultation was accompanied by a rigorous quantitative impact study, which was supplemented by a half-yearly public Basel III monitoring exercise. So it is reassuring and appropriate to find that a recent academic study concluded that the Committee’s consultation approach is “one of the most procedurally sophisticated” processes among policymaking bodies.7 Moreover, member jurisdictions have undertaken their own rigorous domestic rule-making processes to transpose these standards.

    But the work to fix the banking system fault lines exposed by the GFC is not done. We need to lock in the financial stability benefits of implementing the outstanding Basel III standards in full and consistently, and as soon as possible. I take comfort in the recent unanimous reaffirmation by the GHOS to achieve such an outcome.8 The Committee has been actively monitoring and assessing the full and consistent implementation of Basel III and will continue to do so.

    As this is my maiden speech as Committee Chair, I will outline some high-level principles that I will be relying upon to help guide how I view the work of the Committee. I will also offer a few personal reflections on some topical issues. As a keen sailor, I should apologise in advance for my continued use of maritime language!

    Principle 1: Sail forward but always glance back

    My starting point is that we cannot afford to ignore, or forget, the lessons of history. This time is not different. There have been no fewer than 150 systemic banking crises since 1970.9 Just last year, we saw the most significant system-wide banking stress since the GFC, including the distress of five banks with total assets exceeding one trillion US dollars. While each banking crisis may have had its unique characteristics, the common thread throughout history is that we simply cannot predict when or from where the next crisis will emerge. We therefore need to ensure robust and durable resilience for the global banking system to withstand a range of potential shocks.    

    Banking crises have a profound impact on our economies and social welfare. In my home country of Sweden, the 1990s banking crisis and the GFC resulted in output losses of over 30% and 25%, respectively.10 These are not just numbers, but reflect economic hardships endured by citizens, including job losses and foregone growth potential. We must always remember this stark reality when regulating and supervising banks.

    And yet, despite the painful effects of banking crises, history suggests that the lessons from such events are often forgotten as part of a “regulatory cycle”.11 Memories fade over time, and a view takes hold that this time really is different. As the cycle turns, policymakers, supervisors and risk managers at banks sometimes become complacent and give in to pressures to dilute regulatory safeguards. Such a journey never ends well: it is only a matter of time until stormy waters reveal banks’ stress points and fractures.

    This is not a course that I intend to chart. The reality is that a banking system built upon leverage and maturity transformation will inevitably face episodes of distress. Misconduct, governance failures and imprudent risk management practices further increase the likelihood and impact of crises.

    To be clear, the first and most important source of resilience comes from banks’ own risk management practices and governance arrangements. The boards and management of banks should be the first port of call in managing and overseeing risks; they cannot outsource these functions to supervisors. Yet history suggests that some banks’ boards and senior management occasionally fail in their most elementary responsibilities. So it is critical that bankers, policymakers and supervisors do not forget the lessons from the past and take a medium-term perspective. Consider, for example, the recent growth in the use of so-called synthetic risk transfers (SRTs) by banks across several regions.12 Such transactions are intended to reduce banks’ capital requirements by “transferring” the risks associated with some exposures to a third party – often a non-bank financial intermediary (NBFI) – which provides credit protection or insurance. The Basel Framework allows for such transactions to take place subject to meeting certain criteria, and they may in instances be an effective risk management technique. However, I personally believe that we should not lose sight of the bigger picture and lessons from the GFC. In particular, we should ask ourselves: are there system-wide risks that warrant closer attention? For example, what are the risks if NBFI investors of SRTs are in turn borrowing from other banks? Is there sufficient transparency about the interconnections and potential spillover of risks between banks and NBFIs in these – and other – markets? A natural starting point to help answer these questions is to remind ourselves of the lessons from the GFC. 

    Just like a sailor needs steady winds, strong sails and safety gear for times of stress to ensure a smooth voyage, a bank requires strong prudential regulation and supervision to ensure stability. And its board and senior management should display the leadership and competency of a veteran captain. In addition, it is critical that the Committee remains vigilant and pursues a forward-looking approach to assessing risks and vulnerabilities to help reduce the risk of the global banking system being blown off course into financial storms.

    The Committee’s work should also continue to be anchored by rigorous empirical analysis and not succumb to short-term or specific interests of some external stakeholders. And the GHOS agreed to mark a clear end to the Basel III policy agenda in 2020 when it noted that any further potential adjustments to Basel III “will be limited in nature and consistent with the Committee’s evaluation work”.13 This is why the Committee is pursuing analytical work based on empirical evidence to assess whether specific features of the Basel Framework performed as intended during the 2023 banking turmoil, such as liquidity risk and interest rate risk in the banking book.14 On this note, we recently provided a progress report to the G20 which outlines the progress we have made in the area of liquidity risk.15 This is a good start, but there is still more work to be done. Structural changes affecting the financial system, such as the ongoing digitalisation of finance and role of social media, require policymakers and supervisors to remain alert and be open-minded as to whether any additional regulatory and supervisory measures are needed.

    Principle 2: All hands on deck

    My second guiding principle is the need for global and transparent engagement with a wide range of stakeholders.

    Financial stability is a global public good that requires cross-border cooperation. An open global financial system requires global prudential standards. Failure on this count could result in regulatory fragmentation, regulatory arbitrage and a potential “race to the bottom” leading to a dilution of banks’ resilience.16

    So I will strive to build on the strong track record of Committee members to cooperate and collaborate in tackling cross-border financial stability challenges and shoring up the resilience of the global banking system. We have witnessed the benefits of global cooperation throughout the Committee’s history, including with the Concordat, Basel I, II and III, and the Basel Core Principles, and of course more recently during the Covid-19 period and last year’s banking turmoil. And in a world facing major geopolitical uncertainty, and where the merits of multilateralism are sometimes questioned, it is even more critical for the Committee to remind all stakeholders of the necessity of cross-border cooperation.

    The need for cooperation is not just among Committee members themselves. Given the increasingly cross-sectoral and cross-cutting nature of developments affecting the global financial system – such as the ongoing digitalisation of finance, the growing role of NBFIs, the increasing nodes of interconnections among banks, central counterparties and NBFIs, or climate-related financial risks – the Committee will need to increasingly liaise with a wide range of authorities. This includes ongoing cooperation with central banks and supervisory authorities outside the Basel Committee’s membership, but also financial sector authorities in charge of overseeing conduct, resolution, deposit insurance, payment systems, securities and other NBFIs. In fact, for certain topics there may also be a need to go beyond the financial sector sphere and liaise with authorities with responsibility for accounting, competition, data privacy and security, just to mention a few.

    To this end, it is critical that the Committee continues to seek the views of a wide range of stakeholders, including academics, civil society, legislators, market participants and the general public. Even if we may have different views on specific elements of the Committee’s work, these engagements unquestionably enhance the Committee’s outputs by bringing in different perspectives.

    Principle 3: Keep your heading steady

    My third principle is the importance for the Committee to act as a lighthouse, cutting through the fog and stormy conditions.

    Bank regulation and financial supervision are an anchor to help prevent banks from drifting into risky waters that could endanger the entire economy. A resilient and healthy banking system is one that can best support households and businesses through the robust provision of key financial services across the financial cycle.17

    Let me give you an example from my home country. Before the pandemic, the initial set of Basel III standards were fully implemented in Sweden. These reforms significantly increased Swedish banks’ resilience to shocks. In addition, the Swedish authorities activated the Basel III countercyclical buffer and set it at 2.5%, with the aim to further enhance Swedish banks’ resilience. Doing so allowed us to release this buffer in response to the Covid-19 crisis, which in turn helped Swedish banks to absorb shocks and to lend to creditworthy households and companies throughout the pandemic. The releasability of this buffer facilitated its drawdown by banks in a way that made it genuinely usable.

    It may be tempting for some to argue that regulations should be watered down and that supervision should be less intrusive, in order to promote lending to specific sectors or to “unlock” economic growth. But, as with other areas of economic policymaking, any perceived short-term gains are usually more than offset by longer-term pain. Shaving off a few basis points of capital will not unlock a wave of new lending, but it will weaken your resilience. More generally, being well capitalised is a competitive advantage for banks and their shareholders, as it ensures that they can continue to grow and invest in profitable projects across the financial cycle. The Committee’s work should therefore continue to be centred around its mandate.

    To be clear, this is entirely compatible with stable and healthy earnings that are fundamental to banking and financial stability. So it is reassuring that the sample of banks for which we regularly collect data – many of which are represented here today – have over time been able to both meet new regulatory requirements, make healthy profits and pay out significant dividends. For example, in 2011 banks faced a CET1 capital shortfall from Basel III of about €485 billion. Since then, their profits have exceeded €4 trillion and banks have paid out over €1.3 trillion of common share dividends, while at the same time building capital and liquidity buffers to meet the new requirements.18

    More generally, the Committee will continue to focus its work on those prudential areas that require a global and coordinated response. Its outputs will continue to take the form of global minimum standards to provide a common financial stability baseline across jurisdictions. Jurisdictions are, of course, free to go beyond this baseline if the size and structure of their banking system and the associated risks warrant additional measures. Such measures only reinforce global financial stability. Just as importantly, we will continue to promote strong supervision, including by sharing supervisory experiences and, when needed, developing additional guidance to assist supervisors worldwide.

    In that regard, I am sure all of us can agree that it is in our collective best interest to have global standards. We may have different opinions about Basel III, but I think we can all agree that having a globally consistent level playing field is preferable to a patchwork of disparate regulations. A global compromise – however imperfect it may appear to some – is preferable to a free-for-all framework. Internationally active banks then have a common minimum regulatory baseline which they can manage their business around. Supervisors are able to better assess the relative resilience of their banks across jurisdictions. The scope for regulatory arbitrage is reduced. Level playing fields are enhanced. Now compare this with a fragmented bank regulatory world, where banks would have to comply with completely different rules across borders with no common minimum baseline. Such a scenario could also trigger a race to the bottom across jurisdictions, resulting in a frail regulatory framework that would threaten global financial stability and banks’ own viability. We would all be worse off in such a situation. It is therefore in your own interest to avoid such a scenario and to promote a common and consistent implementation of Basel III.

    Finally, we should keep the fundamentals of bank regulation and supervision in mind. While it may be tempting to focus on the “newest” trends affecting the banking system, we should not lose sight of the more traditional risks, such as credit risk and liquidity risk. Regarding the former, despite repeated headwinds over the past few years, the feared wave of financial problems for households and corporate defaults has yet to appear. Yet I am personally concerned about some stakeholders’ seeming complacency in assuming that the worst is over and that the seas are calm. It is a universal truth that a calm sea does not make a clever sailor.

    With continued uncertainty about interest rate trajectories and the economic outlook, hidden currents and unseen reefs could still pose a challenge. Banks and supervisors must remain vigilant to such risks.

    Principle 4: Sailing to simplicity

    My last principle is to ensure that the Committee continues to adequately balance risk sensitivity with simplicity and comparability. Finance and banking are complex activities, so there is perhaps an understandable temptation to match that complexity in the regulatory framework.

    Yet one does not always fight fire with fire. Undue complexity in prudential regulation can undermine the ability for a bank’s board and senior management to fully understand the risk profile of their bank. It can also impede supervisors’ ability to effectively assess the resilience of banks and create opaque opportunities for arbitrage. And while complex rules may sound conceptually appealing, they may also prove to be challenging to operationalise in practice.

    Banking is as much about risk as it is about uncertainty.19 In such a world, simpler approaches can sometimes be more robust and outperform more complex ones.20 So I personally think that policymaking initiatives should ensure that sufficient attention is placed at striking the right balance between risk sensitivity, simplicity and comparability.

    Conclusion

    In conclusion, the Committee will continue to be guided by its mandate of strengthening the regulation, supervision and practices of banks worldwide. In the near term, when it comes to Basel III, all GHOS members have unanimously reaffirmed their expectation of implementing all aspects of the framework in full, consistently and as soon as possible.21

    More generally, fulfilling our mandate requires us all to remember that:

    • Banks’ boards and senior management are the captains of their ships. You have both the primary and ultimate responsibility for overseeing and managing risks. Regulation and supervision can provide safeguards, but cannot and should not be a substitute for your role in managing your risks prudently.
    • Global bank prudential standards are a public good. We are collectively all better off in a world with global standards than in an autarkic one. Lobbying for deviations at a national level can perhaps provide short-term (private) gains but will ultimately threaten global financial stability. As internationally active banks, it is not in your interest to sail in such an environment.
    • We cannot forget the lessons from past banking crises to prepare effectively for the future. In a financial system undergoing profound structural transformations, such as the digitalisation of finance, the Committee should keep an open mind as to whether additional adjustments to the Basel Framework are warranted over the medium term. And we will focus on global financial stability issues that require a global response.

    As Chair, I am fully committed to leading the Committee in that direction.

    References

    Aikman, D, M Glaesic, G Gigerenzer, S Kapadia, K Kastikopoulos, A Kothiyal, E Murphy and T Neumann (2021): “Taking uncertainty seriously: simplicity versus complexity in financial regulation”, Industrial and Corporate Change, vol 30, no 2, April.

    Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) (2020): “Governors and Heads of Supervision commit to ongoing coordinated approach to mitigate Covid-19 risks to the global banking system and endorse future direction of Basel Committee work”, press release, 30 November.

    — (2022a): Evaluation of the impact and efficacy of the Basel III reforms, December.

    — (2022b): Evaluation of the impact and efficacy of the Basel III reforms – Annex, December.

    — (2023): Report on the 2023 banking turmoil, October.

    — (2024a): “Erik Thedéen appointed as Chair of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision”, press release, 13 May.

    — (2024b): “Governors and Heads of Supervision reiterate commitment to Basel III implementation and provide update on cryptoasset standard”, press release, 13 May.

    — (2024c): “BCBS dashboards”, September.

    — (2024d): The 2023 banking turmoil and liquidity risk: a progress report, October.

    Carstens, A (2019): “The role of regulation, implementation and research in promoting financial stability”, keynote address at the Bank of Spain and CEMFI Second Conference on Financial Stability, Madrid, 3 June.

    Hernández de Cos, P (2019): “The future path of the Basel Committee: some guiding principles”, keynote speech at the Institute for International Finance Annual Membership Meeting, Washington DC, 17 October.

    — (2022): “A resilient transition to net zero”, remarks at the International Economic Forum of the Americas, 28th edition of the Conference of Montreal, 11 July.

    — (2024): “Building on 50 years of global cooperation”, keynote speech at the 23rd International Conference of Banking Supervisors, Basel, 24 April.

    Knight, F (1921): Risk, uncertainty and profit, Houghton Mifflin.

    Laeven, L and F Valencia (2018): “Systemic banking crises revisited”, IMF Working Paper, no 18/206.

    S&P Global (2024): “Banks ramp up credit risk transfers to optimise regulatory capital”, 22 February.

    Viterbo, A (2019): “The European Union in the transnational financial regulatory arena: the case of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision”, Journal of International Economic Law, vol 1, no 24, June.


    This speech and the views expressed are those of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and/or position of the BIS or CPMI.

    MIL OSI Global Banks

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Bill to strengthen puppy and dog welfare across New South Wales

    Source: New South Wales Government 2

    Headline: Bill to strengthen puppy and dog welfare across New South Wales

    Published: 24 October 2024

    Released by: Minister for Agriculture, Minister for Local Government


    The Minns Labor Government will today introduce a Bill to Parliament to strengthen puppy and dog welfare across the state by establishing clear guardrails and standards for dog breeders.

    Committed to during the election this legislation has been developed through close consultation with experts, industry and animal welfare advocates, to ensure community expectations are reflected in New South Wales laws.

    The Bill targets key risks to animal health and welfare associated with dog breeding practices that have been of concern for some time.  Changes under this Bill include:

    • Mandating that breeders must, for the first time, obtain a Breeder Identification Number through the NSW pet registry, enabling transparency of the sector and assisting people acquiring a puppy.
    • Setting a lifetime litter limit for fertile female adult dogs (those over 6 months old) to five natural litters or up to three caesarean litters, whichever occurs first.
    • Establishing a care standard of one staff carer for every 20 adult dogs ensuring sufficient care, food and water are provided.
    • Establishing a maximum cap of 20 fertile female dogs (over the age of six months) at any breeding premise.
    • A maximum penalty for individuals of $110,000, two years imprisonment or both and $550,000 for organisations will apply for breaches of this cap.

    This bill seeks to stop puppy farming by providing a robust and modernised regulatory system for all breeders to deliver good animal welfare without imposing undue regulatory burden on legitimate breeders.

    The Government is therefore enabling within the Bill that breeders with more than 20 fertile dogs will be able to apply for a limited exemption from this cap. This exemption will apply for ten years, giving breeders significant time to appropriately scale down their operations.

    Currently in New South Wales there has been no compulsory registration scheme for breeders and no restrictions on the number of breeding female dogs that a person or business can have, or the number of litters a female dog can produce in their lifetimes.

    Without these safeguards animal welfare has been jeopardised with unethical breeders in some instances establishing facilities of dozens or hundreds of dogs without providing essential care.

    The majority of the changes will come into effect from December 2025, allowing time for the Government to rollout an education campaign for breeders, dog owners and those considering acquiring a puppy.

    NSW Minister for Agriculture Tara Moriarty said:

    “With half of all households having a dog at home there is significant community concern about the welfare of these dogs as puppies, and about the practice of puppy farms.

    “Most breeders do the right thing, but there is a clear message from the community that large-scale, unregulated breeding practices are not acceptable, and breeders should be registered.

    “We came to Government with a commitment to clean up the sector and to enhance animal welfare because it means a lot to everyone in our community and for our dogs.

    “Our Bill ensures transparency, accountability, and appropriate animal welfare standards in all breeding operations across NSW.

    “This Bill is about stopping the bad apples of this industry while supporting good and professional people who prioritise the health and welfare of their animals.

    “These changes will be easy to understand for industry and will allow people to distinguish ethical breeders who promote responsible breeding practices from dodgy puppy farmers.

    Minister for Local Government Ron Hoenig said:

    “People expect that any dog purchased from a breeder has been treated well and has not been exploited by dishonest puppy farmers to turn a profit. 

    “This Bill applies a strict regulatory framework to provide the government with greater oversight to ensure all breeders are complying with animal welfare standards and community expectations.

    “All industry and animal welfare stakeholders agree that there is a need to clean out the bad actors and for better animal and customer protection against those few unethical breeders. That is what this Bill delivers.”

    Animal Welfare League NSW CEO Stephen Albin said:

    “The Animal Welfare League NSW strongly supports the Bill as it will crack down on breeders who are doing the wrong thing and improve animal welfare.

    “It also sets a new regulatory framework that will deliver higher standards in the breeding industry and give established breeders time to meet those standards.

    “We have seen a huge spike in breeding since COVID-19, with a big increase in dogs coming into the shelter, blowing out our waiting lists and making it extremely challenging to find new, loving homes for dogs, who are often just puppies.

    “Sadly, too many dogs are not finding a new home.

    “This Bill will help ease the pressure on our shelters and allow us to rehome dogs that have been surrendered or abandoned.”

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI: Prospera Energy Inc. Corporate Update: Three Years of Strategic Restructuring, Recovery, and Future Growth

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    CALGARY, Alberta, Oct. 24, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Prospera Energy Inc. (“PEI”) (TSX.V: PEI, OTC: GXRFF, FRA: OF6B)

    The 2024 Prospera corporate update outlines the company’s restructuring efforts since 2021, highlighting key milestones achieved, challenges faced, and the strategic path forward to achieve production stability and profitability.

    Preamble:
    By the end of 2020 Prospera faced a litany of financial challenges, including low production, high operating costs, and the global impacts of the Covid pandemic. The company’s liability was in excess of $24MM ($12MM ARO, $11MM AP arrears, & $1.5MM in Credit Facilities) mainly towards secured mezzanine capital, CRA, mineral royalties, municipality property tax, landowners lease payments, numerous local service providers, and high asset retirement obligations. Adding to the problems, Prospera had in excess of 400+ non-compliance infractions with spills, dysfunctional monitoring devices, and facilities that had been neglected and orphaned. Consequently, Prospera Energy Inc. was in a terminal position. In Q1 2021, the municipality and secured debt holder exercised their rights, taking control of payments from the limited revenue and production that remained. The then-CEO and directors were fleeing from the company’s obligations, especially to the CRA.

    Towards the end of 2020, PEI’s continuing operations had become difficult due to high and long-term liabilities, a situation further amplified by the pandemic and drastic reduction in produced volumes (less than 200 bpd Gross).

    At the time, Mr. Samuel David was leading a private company developing medium-light oil around the Brooks area and as a result of his association with the late Burkhart Franz, founder of Prospera Energy Inc. (formerly Georox Resources), Mr. David accepted a role as an advisor to help rescue the company from entering into CCA.

    Prospera Energy Restructure:
    Prospera Energy Inc’s restructuring commenced in Q1, 2021, with the appointment of Mr. David as President, CEO & Director. Mr. David observed legacy heavy (13-17API) oil fields were developed with numerous vertical wells on reduced spacing. These wells were in primary depletion without any patterned pressure support. Produced water was randomly disposed resulting in water recycling. Reserves were estimated on the decline of the small number of low producing wells and their economies were burdened by high surface lease costs and their high number of standing wells. Unprocessed 3-D seismic coverage was available over the entire reservoir of each asset, each of which has a facility processing capacity to handle large volumes of produced fluid, and the wells were tied into these central facilities. Clean oils were trucked out to a nearby terminal. Produced water was reinjected by central pumps at the facility to injectors throughout the field. These infrastructures had previously been neglected and not maintained.

    Mr. David recognized the recovery to date was low with respect to volumetric estimation of oil in place, and a significant amount of oil remains within adequate infrastructure. The recovery has been from an under pressured solution gas drive reservoir with low active edge water and exploited by vertical well technology only. However, high AP arrears, ARO and neglected infrastructure were significant obstacles. Overcoming poor technical conduct and neglect required sufficient capital to exploit the remaining reserves effectively and profitably. To rectify these issues, Samuel devised a development plan in phases to capture the significant remaining reserves.

    The Prospera development plan is comprised of three phases:

    1. Phase one was to bring operations to safe operating conditions and optimize low hanging opportunities to increase production.
    2. Phase two was to transition to horizontal wells and abandon depleted vertical wells along the path. This reduces the environmental footprint and the corresponding fixed operating cost. It would also diversify product mix by adding higher API oil assets.
    3. The third and final phase is to implement improved and enhanced recovery methods tailored to the reservoir conditions, aiming to reduce decline for sustained long-term production. This approach, combined with a reduced footprint and lower operating costs, is designed to yield higher margins.

    At the time, the minimum allowed for a private placement was five cents, while PEI stock was trading at one cent and at risk of being halted. Fortunately, a one-time, two-cents private placement offering opportunity, that was only offered during extraordinary circumstances such as the pandemic, was permitted. Utilizing this opportunity and the proposed engineering solutions, capital was raised with the assistance of Kurt Soost, who played a key role in connecting credible investors such as Peter Lacey, Dave Richardson, and others to the seed capital provided by the management group, which included Mr. David and Jaz Dhaliwal. They participated in the initial and subsequent private placement offerings, helping Prospera secure a financial lifeline.

    This realigned the PEI board, which requested Mr. David amalgamate his private company assets into Prospera at an equal interest, to avoid any perception of bias towards his assets and to ensure focus on Prospera’s asset development going forward. As a result, Prospera acquired a 50% working interest in a medium-light oil property with operatorship from Mr. David on favorable terms, with no upfront cash consideration and delayed consideration on a success basis. These terms were released on December 7th, 2022, and the transaction consideration was based on third-party evaluations, TSX approval, and independent scrutiny and approval resolution by the directors.

    Restructuring Efforts Resulted In:
    Oil in Place Validated – Prospera Oil in place and remaining reserves were authenticated by geological delineation, well control & production performance, 3D seismic confirmation, and by 3rd party evaluation

    • Total OOIP = 396.7 MMbbl
    • Produced = 34.2 MMbbl
    • Recovered = 8.6%

    NPV Appreciation – Net Present value of the reserves was steadily substantiated by PEI’s optimization and development. As a result:

    • Before Tax PDP reserves increased 508% from $4.4MM$ to $27.1MM$ in 2023 at a 10% discount rate
    • Before tax 2P reserves increased by $60.8m from $72.5m to $133.3MM$ in 2023 at a 10% discount rate
    • Total proved and probable reserves increased by 25% from 4,306 to 5,403 Mboe
    • Reserve life index increased by 6% from 28.4 to 30.0 years

    Increased Ownership – In the three core heavy oil properties from an average of 35% to 95% by settling out joint venture receivables.

    Regulator License Liability Rating – Asset to liability ratio was elevated by PEI restructured efforts

    • The Saskatchewan regulator assessed the company’s asset value 18MM$ higher due to the changes implemented
    • The asset to liability ratio has increased from 0.47 to 1.44 in Saskatchewan
    • The asset to liability ratio has increased from 0.90 to 2.60 in Alberta

    Diversify Production Mix – Acquired a 50% interest in Medium-oil development play and successfully perforated two existing wells with favorable results. In 2023, the first well was drilled, with initial production (IP) rates exceeding expectations. This led to attractive investment returns, with a payout achieved in just seven months.

    In 2024, four development wells were drilled, encountering pay, structure, and oil shows as anticipated. The first medium-oil horizontal well encountered 800 meters of porous reservoirs with oil shown in the lateral section. The well test demonstrated strong inflow, producing over 50 m³/d of fluid at 50% oil cuts. The oil quality is 26–30-degrees API. This well is now online and delivering consistent rates as it is stabilizing.

    Financial Position Appreciation – Netbook value (Total assets) has increased from $5.5 million in 2020 to approximately $59.0 million by the end of Q3 2024. This growth was driven by capital raised ($35MM) and cash flow from operations ($7MM), both of which were deployed for optimization and development. Additional value appreciation resulted from an impairment reversal, supported by the substantiation of remaining reserve value ($8 million) and the capitalization of a working interest acquisition ($3 million). Since 2021, the total asset value has been appreciated by $53+ million. 

    Due to capital deployed for optimization, non-compliance elimination, infrastructure upgrades and development aimed at increasing production and recoveries, the company is beginning to see operational profitability. 2022 saw production increased and, if not for the lower commodity prices in 2023, the company would have been profitable in 2022. Nonetheless, 2022 was a rebound year, generating $2.3 million in operating income compared to a substantial loss the previous year. With ongoing production optimization and development, Prospera has achieved approximately $2.6 million in cash operating income as of Q3, 2024.

    The restructuring efforts have transformed the company into cash-flow-positive operation. Prospera’s bare bones break-even operating expenses are $1.1 million per month (500 boe/d @ $75/boe CAD). Any cash flow above this break-even amount is allocated to servicing debt, addressing legacy arrears and further funding, optimization and development initiatives.

    With current production levels around 900 boe/d, the company has generated $2.6 million year to date Q3, 2024.

    Production Appreciation & Challenges – PEI’s restructuring efforts successfully optimized production from 80 boepd to 800 boepd during the phase one execution. By the end of 2023, peak production rates reach 1,800 boepd driven by horizontal development and medium oil development.

    While the restructuring yielded positive results, Prospera production progress and forecast were impacted by operational set-back and by severe cold weather conditions. These issues hindered expected production rates, preventing the company from achieving its short-term production and financial targets.

    PEI has continually implemented measures to address operational constraints, and restore and maintain peak production rates. These include failure analysis, calibrated equipment, revised operational procedures, and accountability for accurate and timely data to maximize run time with experienced personnel. As a result, Cuthbert operations are starting to stabilize while challenges are being addressed. Approximately 70+ m3/d of production is currently behind pipe at Cuthbert, and PEI is focused on capturing this additional volume.

    Revised 2024 Prospera Forecast
    Following a challenging recalibration, Prospera has expressed optimism going forward, however, PEI has faced a series of challenges including cold weather conditions, infrastructure breakdown, water recycling issues, legacy arrears, non-participating JV partners, and lower commodity prices. These factors have unexpectedly delayed the company’s timeline for attaining the initially projected targets.

    The legacy reservoirs are now in the final stages of primary pressure depletion and require additional energy in-situ to increase the mobility of the viscous oil. Enhanced recovery methods suited to the specific reservoir conditions must be applied gradually and methodically to maximize oil recovery, which will take time. PEI has initiated horizontal transformation while testing the recovery methods to be applied to the future horizontal wells while modifying necessary infrastructure adjustments. With the benefit of new information, extensive data, and a revised plan, Prospera has reassessed and incorporated the challenges and setback into the company’s updated forecast moving forward.

    Prospera has achieved many technical and financial successes, these accomplishments have been overshadowed by production shortfalls set out by optimistic early targets. Moving forward, PEI’s primary focus is on efficient operations to ensure sustained, stable production and production growth.  

    Conclusion
    Prospera Energy Inc. has come a long way since the brink of bankruptcy in Q1, 2021. Through a successful restructuring, PEI has eliminated the risk of insolvency, addressed critical regulatory non-compliances, and raised regulator license liability ratings by increasing production through optimization and development. The company has also substantiated the large amount of remaining reserves and substantially increased the proven asset value of the company. By improving cash flow from operations well above break-even, PEI has remained operational while deploying capital to address legacy accounts payable arrears and implement proven technical applications. Additionally, the acquisition of medium-oil assets has reduced dependency on heavy-oil differentials.

    In short, Prospera have made significant progress in positioning the company for future growth. However, PEI achievements have been overshadowed by production short fall set out by optimistic targets by optimization and drilling success. Prospera acknowledges these challenges encountered and has incorporated them into the revised 2024 forecast, to allocate sufficient time and resources to improve operational efficiencies, optimize well run times, and implement reservoir management applications while adhering to safety & regulatory guidelines. These proactive measures are being implemented in Q4 2024 and Q1 2025 to stabilize and support robust, sustained growth throughout Q2 and Q3 of 2025.

    While the company is revising the year-end production target down to 1,250 barrels, it is important to emphasize that the fundamentals of Prospera Energy’s assets remain strong. The significant recovery potential remains within reach, and PEI continues to execute on our long-term development plan to capitalize on these opportunities. The reduction in short-term targets does not diminish the company’s confidence in the strategic path forward. Prospera remains focused on optimizing production, improving efficiency, and unlocking the full value of PEI’s resources. As Prospera moves ahead, the company is committed to increasing production through optimization, horizontal transformation, and enhanced oil recovery.

    About Prospera
    Prospera is a publicly traded energy company based in Western Canada, specializing in the exploration, development, and production of crude oil and natural gas. Prospera is primarily focused on optimizing hydrocarbon recovery from legacy fields through environmentally safe and efficient reservoir development methods and production practices. Prospera was restructured in the first quarter of 2021 to become profitable and in compliance with regulatory, environmental, municipal, landowner, and service stakeholders.

    The company is in the midst of a three-stage restructuring process aimed at prioritizing cost effective operations while appreciating production capacity and reducing liabilities. Prospera has completed the first phase by optimizing low hanging opportunities, attaining free cash flow, while bringing operation to safe operating condition, all while remaining compliant. Currently, Prospera is executing phase II of the restructuring process, the horizontal transformation intended to accelerate growth and capture the significant oil in place (400 million bbls). These horizontal wells allow PEI to reduce its environmental and surface footprint by eliminating the numerous vertical well leases along the lateral path. Phase III of Prospera’s corporate redevelopment strategy is to optimize recovery through EOR applications. Furthermore, Prospera will pursue its acquisition strategy to diversify its product mix and expand its core area. Its goal is to attain 50% light oil, 40% heavy oil and 10% gas.

    The Corporation continues to apply efforts to minimize its environmental footprint. Also, efforts to reduce and eventually eliminate emissions, alongside pursuing innovative ESG methods to enhance API quality, thereby achieving higher margins and eliminating the need for diluents.

    For Further Information:
    Shawn Mehler, PR
    Email: investors@prosperaenergy.com
    Website: www.prosperaenergy.com

    FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
    This news release contains forward-looking statements relating to the future operations of the Corporation and other statements that are not historical facts. Forward-looking statements are often identified by terms such as “will,” “may,” “should,” “anticipate,” “expects” and similar expressions. All statements other than statements of historical fact included in this release, including, without limitation, statements regarding future plans and objectives of the Corporation, are forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate and actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements.

    Although Prospera believes that the expectations and assumptions on which the forward-looking statements are based are reasonable, undue reliance should not be placed on the forward-looking statements because Prospera can give no assurance that they will prove to be correct. Since forward-looking statements address future events and conditions, by their very nature they involve inherent risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those currently anticipated due to a number of factors and risks. These include, but are not limited to, risks associated with the oil and gas industry in general (e.g., operational risks in development, exploration and production; delays or changes in plans with respect to exploration or development projects or capital expenditures; the uncertainty of reserve estimates; the uncertainty of estimates and projections relating to production, costs and expenses, and health, safety and environmental risks), commodity price and exchange rate fluctuations and uncertainties resulting from potential delays or changes in plans with respect to exploration or development projects or capital expenditures.

    The reader is cautioned that assumptions used in the preparation of any forward-looking information may prove to be incorrect. Events or circumstances may cause actual results to differ materially from those predicted, as a result of numerous known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors, many of which are beyond the control of Prospera. As a result, Prospera cannot guarantee that any forward-looking statement will materialize, and the reader is cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward- looking information. Such information, although considered reasonable by management at the time of preparation, may prove to be incorrect and actual results may differ materially from those anticipated. Forward-looking statements contained in this news release are expressly qualified by this cautionary statement. The forward-looking statements contained in this news release are made as of the date of this news release, and Prospera does not undertake any obligation to update publicly or to revise any of the included forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as expressly required by Canadian securities law.

    Neither TSXV nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSXV) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

    Photos accompanying this announcement are available at:
    https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/0b193b58-7798-4139-b69d-1f8aec58a8f7
    https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/46e266dc-9f3f-43b1-a3f7-1f71bb526cce
    https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/2d404ae6-c38e-40c3-910a-403f9376549f
    https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/506b134d-3ce3-4639-9a61-f0caa42b633e
    https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/b0ac6d1d-5ea5-4c86-b5b4-d49a72936f7b
    https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/e14fb81b-462a-456d-99fa-e4a54a549e7d
    https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/100176cb-60ba-45e8-9311-e94604dcd117
    https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/8fc83e60-6686-4b8f-93e8-84598ec586a0
    https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/6c20cd2d-ef07-41b7-9149-5d80f7288b16
    https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/fb37dc99-2c7f-4db1-bcab-a3807af55016

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Security: Orange County Supervisor Agrees to Plead Guilty to Bribery Conspiracy Involving $10 Million in COVID Relief Funds

    Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) State Crime Alerts (b)

    OC Supervisor Andrew Do Admits Receiving More Than $550,000 in Bribe Payments from Funds Meant to Be Used to Provide Meals to Elderly

    SANTA ANA, California – The District One Supervisor on the Orange County Board of Supervisors has agreed to plead guilty to a felony federal charge for accepting more than $550,000 in bribes for directing and voting in favor of more than $10 million in COVID funds to a charity affiliated with one of his daughters, Rhiannon Do, the Justice Department announced today. 

    Andrew Hoang Do, 62, agreed to plead guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit bribery concerning programs receiving federal funds. His plea agreement and information were filed today. He is expected to make his initial appearance in United States District Court in Santa Ana later this month.

    Do is one of five supervisors on the Orange County Board of Supervisors, which is responsible for the county’s $9 billion annual budget. As a county supervisor, Do represents the cities of Cypress, Fountain Valley, Garden Grove, Huntington Beach, La Palma, Los Alamitos, Midway City, Rossmoor, Seal Beach, and Westminster. He has served as a county supervisor since February 2015.

    As part of his plea agreement, Do admitted that in exchange for more than $550,000 in bribes, beginning in 2020, he voted in favor of and directed millions of dollars in COVID-related funds to Viet America Society (VAS), a charity affiliated with his daughter. Do directed and worked together with other county employees to approve contracts with – and payments to – VAS. Do further admitted he acted corruptly and abused his position of trust as a county supervisor.

    “By putting his own interests over those of his constituents, the defendant sold his high office and betrayed the public’s trust,” said United States Attorney Martin Estrada.  “Even worse, the money he misappropriated and accepted as bribe payments was taken from those most in need – older adults and disabled residents. Our community deserved much better. Corruption has no place in our politics and my office will continue to hold accountable officials who cheat the public.”

    “While millions of Americans were dying from COVID-19, Orange County Supervisor Andrew Do was the fox in the hen house personified, raiding millions in federal pandemic relief funds and orchestrating the money intended to feed elderly and ailing residents to instead fill the pockets of insiders, himself and his loved ones all while portraying a public persona of a hometown hero guiding his constituents through the uncertainty and fear of a global pandemic,” said Orange County District Attorney Todd Spitzer. “No one is above the law in Orange County and these charges should serve as a powerful warning to elected officials everywhere that actions have consequences and justice will be swift and it will be decisive.”  

    “Elected officials have a responsibility to implement programs and policy that will benefit all the people they serve.  Their role is not to squander money, solicit bribes, or to steer funds to organizations or persons, wherein a coordinated effort allows those funds to make their way to family members or friends,” said Akil Davis, the Assistant Director in Charge of the FBI’s Los Angeles Field Office. “Today’s plea is another exclamation point to the FBI’s commitment to ensuring that all local, state, or federal elected and appointed public officials perform their duties with honesty, integrity, and commitment to all the constituents they serve.”

    Shortly after receiving the COVID-related public funds from the county government – funds that were intended to provide meals to the elderly – VAS from April 2021 to February 2024 paid a business identified in court documents as “Company #1” $100,000 or more per month, which totaled approximately $3,804,000. In September 2021, VAS increased its payments to Company #1 from $100,000 to $108,000 per month. Company #1 then began paying Rhiannon Do – Do’s daughter – $8,000 per month, totaling by February 2024 approximately $224,000.

    In his plea agreement, Do admitted that in addition to the $8,000 monthly payments that Company #1 had made to Do’s daughter, in July 2023, Company #1 also transferred a total of $381,500 from the funds it had received from VAS to an escrow company. In July 2023, Do’s daughter used the escrow account funds to purchase a home, in her name, in Tustin for $1,035,000. As part of that transaction, a mortgage for more than $600,000 was obtained by a loan application that contained false information and with fabricated documents. In her related diversion agreement attached as an exhibit to Do’s plea agreement, Do’s daughter admitted her conduct was criminal and violated federal and state law.

    Do also admitted that the $381,500 from Company #1 that his daughter had used to purchase the Tustin house in 2023 was a disguised bribe to him. He also admitted that an additional $100,000 in payments sent to his other daughter, including three $25,000 checks from Company #2 – an air conditioning company that had been paid by VAS – also were bribes to him.

    Some of the bribe funds that had been funneled to his daughters were spent for his direct benefit. For example, during 2022, a total of $14,849 of funds that had been funneled to Do’s daughters was used to make property tax payments for properties in Orange County owned by Do and his wife. Approximately $15,000 was used to pay for one of Do’s credit card bills.

    Do knew that VAS was not providing all the meals for which the county had paid VAS. Instead, much of the funds were used for the benefit of insiders, including to buy real estate in the name of both Do’s daughter and Company #1, bribe payments to both of Do’s daughters, payments to other conspirators, payments to other companies affiliated with VAS’s listed officers, and through hundreds of thousands of dollars in cash withdrawals.

    “Mr. Do had a duty to act in the best interest of the citizens of Orange County. He neglected that duty and misused the financial system to enrich himself,” said Special Agent in Charge Ryan Korner with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. Office of Inspector General. “Public corruption degrades the public’s confidence in our political system, and FDIC OIG is proud to work alongside our law enforcement partners to identify and hold accountable individuals who abuse public service for private gain.”

    “Andrew Do was entrusted to ensure taxpayer dollars were used responsibly and for the purposes intended,” said Special Agent in Charge Tyler Hatcher, IRS Criminal Investigation, Los Angeles Field Office. “Instead, when his constituents depended on COVID relief programs, Mr. Do exploited his position on the Orange County Board of Supervisors not only to influence channeling of funds to the Viet America Society, but also to accept bribes that were used to purchase a home, pay property taxes, and even to pay fictitious incomes to family members. Combating public corruption is one of the most important roles federal law enforcement agencies play in our local communities, and we are proud to be a partner during this investigation.” 

    “Today’s actions shows that this elected official used his position of trust for personal gain. He didn’t think he would get caught. He was wrong,” said Adam Shanedling, Special Agent in Charge of the U.S. Department of Education Office of Inspector General’s Western Regional Office. “The OIG is proud to have been a part of the task force that investigated this matter and we’ll continue to work with our law enforcement partners to help safeguard the integrity of federal funds.” 

    The plea agreement requires Do to forfeit any assets connected to the bribery scheme, including the Tustin property his daughter purchased in 2023. As part of his daughter’s related diversion agreement, she also agreed to forfeit the Tustin property. The plea agreement requires Do to pay full restitution by paying back the bribe money he and his daughters received, which he has agreed to pay in full before he is sentenced. In August 2022, the government seized more than $2.4 million from VAS’s and Company #1’s bank accounts.

    In a related agreement with the Orange County District Attorney’s Office (OCDA), attached as an exhibit to Do’s plea agreement, Do has agreed to immediately resign from the Orange County Board of Supervisors and to forfeit any pension credit for the time where he participated in the bribery conspiracy.

    Once Do enters his guilty plea, he will face a statutory maximum sentence of five years in federal prison.

    The FBI; the Orange County District Attorney’s Office Bureau of Investigation; the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. Office of the Inspector General; IRS Criminal Investigation; and the United States Department of Education Office of the Inspector General investigated this matter.

    This matter is being jointly prosecuted by the United States Attorney’s Office and OCDA. The prosecution is being led by Assistant United States Attorneys Charles E. Pell, Bradley E. Marrett, and Tara Vavere of the United States Attorney’s Office and Senior Deputy District Attorney Avery T. Harrison and Deputy District Attorneys Anthony J. Schlehner and L.J. Berger of the OCDA.  

    Any member of the public who has information related to this or any other public corruption matter in Orange County is encouraged to send information to the FBI’s email tip line at https://tips.fbi.gov and/or to contact the FBI’s Los Angeles Field Office at (310) 477-6565.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Global: Harris and Trump differ widely on gun rights, death penalty and other civil liberties questions

    Source: The Conversation – USA – By Donovan A. Watts, Assistant Professor of Political Science, Auburn University

    The Bill of Rights secures key liberties for U.S. citizens against the government’s power. U.S. Congress via Wikimedia Commons

    As the election nears, voters are considering the two leading presidential candidates’ records on a wide range of issues, including civil liberties – a broad term used to describe the constitutionally protected freedoms that protect citizens from excessive government power. These key freedoms are contained in the Bill of Rights, the first 10 amendments to the U.S. Constitution. For example, the protection for free speech under the First Amendment and the right to bear arms under the Second Amendment define people’s abilities to criticize the government and own weapons for private use.

    In turn, as a scholar of American politics, I have seen that Kamala Harris and Donald Trump have very different records on these crucial American rights.

    First Amendment freedoms of speech and press

    As California’s attorney general, Harris indirectly found herself in a battle with the First Amendment. For many years, state law required nonprofit organizations registered in California to report names and addresses of donors of amounts over US$5,000 in a single year. In 2010, the year before Harris became attorney general, her predecessor began actually enforcing that law, which Harris continued when she took office in 2011. In 2014, several conservative groups sued Harris, saying her office’s enforcement of the law was violating their First Amendment right to give money anonymously.

    Part of Harris’ job was to oversee the defense of the law in court, arguing that soliciting donor names did not bar donor disclosure requirements like California’s. The case lasted beyond her term as California’s top law enforcement officer: The U.S. Supreme Court declared parts of the law unconstitutional in 2021, after Harris had become vice president.

    While he was president, Trump’s First Amendment record was more about the media than free speech. He repeatedly declared the press “the enemy of the people.” He has suggested that media outlets who provide coverage he dislikes lose their broadcasting licenses and has pressed to change laws about libel in ways that would make it easier for public figures to file suit against unfavorable coverage.

    As California’s attorney general, Kamala Harris worked to reduce gun violence in the state.
    Kevork Djansezian/Getty Images

    Second Amendment right to bear arms

    Dating back to her tenure as a district attorney in San Francisco and as California’s attorney general, Harris has been an advocate for stricter gun control laws. However, she is not seeking to take away Americans’ guns – and recently revealed that she herself is a gun owner.

    When serving as district attorney in San Francisco, Harris worked with the city’s mayor at the time, Gavin Newsom, to develop some of the strictest local gun regulations in the country. In December 2004, Proposition H was placed on the ballot and passed by majority vote in November 2005. Proposition H banned possessing a handgun within San Francisco, with a few exceptions, and banned purchasing, possession, distribution and manufacturing of all firearms in the city. However, the proposition was overruled by the San Francisco Superior Court, which said gun ownership should be regulated at the state level.

    And in 2008, as the U.S. Supreme Court was preparing to hear a key gun control case, Harris led 18 elected prosecutors who urged the justices that a broad right to gun ownership could endanger local and state firearm laws. In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court held that the Second Amendment guarantees an individual the right to possess firearms.

    However, the Supreme Court’s ruling did not stop Harris in her continued fight for gun regulation. She pushed for additional funding to confiscate guns from thousands of people whom California law said were banned from having them. Later as a U.S. senator from 2017 to 2021, Harris continued to advocate for gun regulation by sponsoring bills that would have enacted universal background checks and ban assault rifles.

    During Harris’ term as vice president, she oversaw the White House Office of Gun Violence Prevention, which seeks to focus government attention on a wide range of policies to reduce gun violence, including restrictions on firearms, increased mental health services and new powers for prosecutors to use against people who use firearms when committing a crime.

    In 2019, while he was president, Donald Trump spoke to a National Rifle Association meeting and expressed support for the organization.
    AP Photo/Michael Conroy

    Trump’s record on firearms, meanwhile, has been mixed. As president, he signed legislation in 2017 that softened background check requirements for gun buyers with particular mental illness diagnoses. And during the COVID-19 pandemic, he objected to the fact that many local orders to close businesses to protect public health included shutting gun shops.

    Yet in 2018, he also moved to ban bump stocks – a device attached to a semiautomatic firearm that enables it to fire more rapidly. His ban was overturned by the Supreme Court in June 2024.

    Trump also supported and signed the Fix NICS Act, a bipartisan law that strengthened reporting to the federal gun background checks system by requiring federal agencies to submit semiannual certification reports to the attorney general on their compliance with recordkeeping and transmission requirements.

    Eighth Amendment protections against ‘cruel and unusual punishments’

    The Eighth Amendment’s protection against “cruel and unusual punishments” has often been used by the Supreme Court to evaluate uses of the death penalty.

    Harris has consistently pledged to refuse to seek the death penalty in criminal cases, noting a multitude of systemic flaws that result in its disproportional application based on defendants’ race and income. She also noted the cost to taxpayers of keeping prisoners on death row. Harris’ position was tested just months into her service as district attorney when a police officer was shot and killed in the line of duty in 2004. Harris declined to seek the death penalty for the shooter, who was convicted of murder and is serving a life sentence without the possibility of parole.

    While attorney general of California, however, she defended in court the state’s power to impose the death penalty. But when, in March 2024, the state’s governor – Newsom – declared a halt to executions, sparing all 737 people on California’s death row, Harris praised the action.

    Trump’s record on capital punishment dates back long before his political career. In 1989, he took out full-page newspaper ads calling for the return of the death penalty in New York. He specifically wanted it to be applied to the Central Park Five, five young Black and Hispanic men who were wrongly accused of raping and beating a woman. They pleaded not guilty but served years in prison before being exonerated by DNA evidence and the actual criminal’s confession.

    During his term as president, Trump resumed federal executions after a 17-year hiatus, executing 13 people in the last six months of his presidency, the last of which was just four days before his term ended.

    All in all, as voters decide who to vote for in the upcoming election, analyzing both candidates’ record on civil liberties is a good step in making an informed decision.

    Donovan A. Watts does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Harris and Trump differ widely on gun rights, death penalty and other civil liberties questions – https://theconversation.com/harris-and-trump-differ-widely-on-gun-rights-death-penalty-and-other-civil-liberties-questions-240762

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: Some reports published in media mentioning shortage of Diammonium Phosphate (DAP) to affect prospects of Rabi crop are misleading, misplaced and devoid of factual position

    Source: Government of India (2)

    Some reports published in media mentioning shortage of Diammonium Phosphate (DAP) to affect prospects of Rabi crop are misleading, misplaced and devoid of factual position

    Subsidy on DAP has not been reduced at all; MRP of DAP has been maintained at Rs. 1350/- per 50 Kg bag since Covid times

    For Rabi season, the increase in subsidy has been effected by two Cabinet decisions

    Total budgetary allocation increased to Rs.24,475 crores for Rabi 2024-25

    Posted On: 23 OCT 2024 8:46PM by PIB Delhi

    Some reports published in the media recently claiming shortage of Diammonium Phosphate (DAP) across the country and its resultant effect on prospects of Rabi crop are misleading, misplaced and devoid of factual position.

    It is clarified that the MRP of DAP has been maintained at Rs. 1350/- per 50 Kg bag since Covid times.

    Further, the subsidy on DAP has not been reduced at all. Instead, for the benefit of farmers, via two Cabinet decisions, an increase in subsidy has been effected for Rabi 2024.

    Firstly, Rs. 3500/- per MT as a special package costing Rs. 2625 crores has been provided to make the price sustainable for companies for procurement of DAP so that the procurement capacity at company level remains unaffected by the price volatility.

    Secondly, the overall increase in prices in the international market has been taken care of by another Cabinet decision by which subsidy has been linked to the market prices. Thus, if the procurement price of P&K fertilizer, including DAP, increases in the global market, the procurement capacities of the companies are not affected. Therefore, farmers are the ultimate beneficiaries.

    In addition to this, the total budgetary allocation for Rabi 2024-2025 has been increased to Rs. 24,475 crores.

    It may be noted that the availability of DAP has been affected somewhat by several geo-political factors including the long route taken by the vessels through Cape of Good Hope instead of Red sea. However, intensive efforts have been made by the Department of Fertilizers to augment the availability substantially during Sept–Nov, 2024.

    *****

    MV/AKS

    (Release ID: 2067500) Visitor Counter : 210

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: Some reports published in media mentioning shortage of DAP to affect prospects of Rabi crop are misleading, misplaced and devoid of factual position

    Source: Government of India

    Some reports published in media mentioning shortage of DAP to affect prospects of Rabi crop are misleading, misplaced and devoid of factual position

    Subsidy on DAP has not been reduced at all; MRP of DAP has been maintained at Rs. 1350/- per 50 Kg bag since Covid times

    For Rabi season, the increase in subsidy has been effected by two Cabinet decisions

    Total budgetary allocation increased to Rs.24,475 crores for Rabi 2024-25

    Posted On: 23 OCT 2024 8:46PM by PIB Delhi

    Some reports published in the media recently claiming shortage of DAP across the country and its resultant effect on prospects of Rabi crop are misleading, misplaced and devoid of factual position.

    It is clarified that the MRP of DAP has been maintained at Rs. 1350/- per 50 Kg bag since Covid times.

    Further, the subsidy on DAP has not been reduced at all. Instead, for the benefit of farmers, via two Cabinet decisions, an increase in subsidy has been effected for Rabi 2024.

    Firstly, Rs. 3500/- per MT as a special package costing Rs. 2625 crores has been provided to make the price sustainable for companies for procurement of DAP so that the procurement capacity at company level remains unaffected by the price volatility.

    Secondly, the overall increase in prices in the international market has been taken care of by another Cabinet decision by which subsidy has been linked to the market prices. Thus, if the procurement price of P&K fertilizer, including DAP, increases in the global market, the procurement capacities of the companies are not affected. Therefore, farmers are the ultimate beneficiaries.

    In addition to this, the total budgetary allocation for Rabi 2024-2025 has been increased to Rs. 24,475 crores.

    It may be noted that the availability of DAP has been affected somewhat by several geo-political factors including the long route taken by the vessels through Cape of Good Hope instead of Red sea. However, intensive efforts have been made by the Department of Fertilizers to augment the availability substantially during Sept–Nov, 2024.

    *****

    MV/AKS

    (Release ID: 2067500) Visitor Counter : 38

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News