Category: CTF

  • MIL-OSI: Countdown to Launch: Lightchain AI Begins Final Presale Phase

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    SHREWSBURY, United Kingdom, July 04, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Lightchain AI, a next-generation blockchain infrastructure platform designed for decentralized artificial intelligence, has announced the start of its Final Bonus Round, following the successful close of its structured presale which raised $21.1 million.

    This final round offers LCAI tokens at a fixed price of $0.007125, providing early supporters and new contributors a last opportunity to participate before the upcoming mainnet launch in July 2025. The structured presale, which included 15 stages and attracted a wide base of early supporters, has helped Lightchain AI build strong traction heading into its network deployment phase.

    Milestone Reflects Growing Confidence in On-Chain AI Infrastructure

    Lightchain AI’s architecture is centered around its proprietary Artificial Intelligence Virtual Machine (AIVM) and Proof-of-Intelligence (PoI) consensus. These technologies allow AI workloads to be executed directly on-chain while maintaining decentralization, transparency, and efficiency. The platform’s consensus mechanism rewards validators for completing meaningful AI computational tasks—transforming network security into a driver for decentralized intelligence.

    The funds raised have been strategically allocated to validator onboarding, ecosystem tools, infrastructure expansion, and grant programs. The team also removed the previously reserved 5% Team Allocation, redirecting it toward builder incentives and network growth to maintain decentralization and transparency.

    Developer Ecosystem and Validator Activity Expanding

    The Lightchain Developer Portal is now live, providing access to SDKs, APIs, and documentation for developers building AI-integrated dApps. A $150,000 grant program is underway to support early builders and technical contributors. The platform’s staking mechanism is fully deployed, enabling validators to simulate reward mechanisms as they prepare for the full network rollout.

    Additionally, Lightchain AI has begun opening access to its public GitHub repositories, ensuring that development efforts remain open and verifiable by the community.

    Final Phase Opens Ahead of Mainnet

    Lightchain AI’s Bonus Round comes with fixed pricing and access to ecosystem incentives and governance tools. It also provides contributors early entry into validator opportunities and token-based rewards structures designed to support long-term network alignment.

    “Crossing $21 million raised is an important validation of our technology and community-first approach,” said a Lightchain AI spokesperson. “This final round is about more than tokens—it’s about expanding our ecosystem and empowering builders as we head toward mainnet.”

    Key Launch Milestones Ahead

    • Mainnet Launch – July 2025
    • Developer Grant Applications – Opening Q3 2025
    • Validator Participation – Ongoing
    • Public GitHub Access – Rolling release through Q3

    To Learn More or Join the Final Bonus Round

    Website: https://lightchain.ai
    Whitepaper: https://lightchain.ai/lightchain-whitepaper.pdf
    Twitter/X: https://x.com/LightchainAI
    Telegram: https://t.me/LightchainProtocol

    Contact:
    SHAJAN SKARIA
    media@lightchain.ai

    Disclaimer: This content is provided by Lightchain AI. The statements, views, and opinions expressed in this content are solely those of the content provider and do not necessarily reflect the views of this media platform or its publisher. We do not endorse, verify, or guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of any information presented. We do not guarantee any claims, statements, or promises made in this article. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial, investment, or trading advice.Investing in crypto and mining-related opportunities involves significant risks, including the potential loss of capital. It is possible to lose all your capital. These products may not be suitable for everyone, and you should ensure that you understand the risks involved. Seek independent advice if necessary. Speculate only with funds that you can afford to lose. Readers are strongly encouraged to conduct their own research and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. However, due to the inherently speculative nature of the blockchain sector—including cryptocurrency, NFTs, and mining—complete accuracy cannot always be guaranteed.Neither the media platform nor the publisher shall be held responsible for any fraudulent activities, misrepresentations, or financial losses arising from the content of this press release. In the event of any legal claims or charges against this article, we accept no liability or responsibility.Globenewswire does not endorse any content on this page.

    Legal Disclaimer: This media platform provides the content of this article on an “as-is” basis, without any warranties or representations of any kind, express or implied. We assume no responsibility for any inaccuracies, errors, or omissions. We do not assume any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information presented herein. Any concerns, complaints, or copyright issues related to this article should be directed to the content provider mentioned above.

    A photo accompanying this announcement is available at https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/40b1489e-d08b-48b0-8cc4-a1701e0401e6

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: Bitcoin Holds Above $110K: Smart Capital Flows into BTC Miner for Daily Stable USD Returns

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    New York City, NY, July 04, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Bitcoin has firmly broken through the $110,000 mark, fueling another wave of enthusiasm across the crypto markets. But behind the volatile charts and headlines, a quieter shift is underway: savvy investors are moving capital into BTC Miner — a cloud mining platform delivering daily USD-denominated profits.

    Instead of chasing market swings, these investors are turning to BTC Miner’s structure-based earning system: users deposit crypto (such as BTC, XRP, ETH, USDT, etc.), choose a contract, and receive automatic daily payouts in USD, regardless of price volatility.

     Official website: https://btcminer.net

    BTC Is an Asset — BTC Miner Makes It Cash Flow

    BTC Miner converts your crypto deposit into a USD-backed mining contract. Your daily earnings are settled in USD, and when it’s time to withdraw, the system automatically converts the amount into your chosen cryptocurrency (BTC, USDT, XRP, etc.).

    •  Supports 10+ top cryptocurrencies: USDT (TRC20/ERC20), BTC, ETH, XRP, BNB, DOGE, BCH, SOL, and more
    •  All earnings are calculated and paid in USD
    •  Flexible withdrawal options in crypto, at real-time rates

    With BTC Miner, you’re no longer speculating — you’re building a daily income stream backed by automated cloud mining infrastructure.

    With Bitcoin Rising, It’s the Perfect Time to Lock in Yield

    A rising BTC market brings not just opportunity, but risk. Many investors are now converting their BTC into BTC Miner contracts to capture daily cash flow while maintaining long-term exposure.

    •  Flexible contract durations: 1-day, 3-day, 5-day, and 8-day options
    •  Invest from $200 to $1,000,000+
    •  Auto-compound option for long-term growth
    •  No need for mining rigs or technical knowledge

    BTC Miner is increasingly popular with institutional capital, digital asset funds, and retail investors who want predictable results — not just speculative gains.

    Why Are Investors Choosing BTC Miner?

    •  No trading risk — just daily income
    •  USD-denominated structure, shielding users from crypto price swings
    •  No maintenance, no hardware, no expertise required
    •  Over 350,000 users worldwide and counting

     $500 Trial Bonus + Up to 8% Referral Commissions Now Live

    BTC Miner is currently running a limited-time promotion:

    •  New users receive a $500 bonus trial contract immediately upon signup
    •  Earn up to 8% commission for every referral who invests

     Learn more: https://btcminer.net

    Conclusion: The Real Wealth Comes from Daily Yield, Not Daily Price Swings

    Bitcoin is rising — but profits only count when they’re realized.

    BTC Miner offers a smart way to convert crypto holdings into structured daily income.
    For long-term holders and smart investors alike, this is crypto investing, redefined.

    Attachments

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Africa: Mauritius: South West Indian Ocean Fisheries Commission (SWIOFC) Member States strengthened regional cooperation for sustainable Tuna fisheries management

    Source: APO – Report:

    The Working Party on Collaboration and Cooperation in Tuna Fisheries (WPCCTF) from the South West Indian Ocean Fisheries Commission (SWIOFC), met in Mauritius to continue its work on strengthening regional cooperation for the effective management of tuna fisheries and other highly migratory fish in the region.

    The 13th Session of the WPCCTF brought together during two days (17-18 June 2025) 11 from the 12 SWIOFC countries – Comoros, France, Kenya, Madagascar, Maldives, Mauritius, Mozambique, Seychelles, Somalia, South Africa and Tanzania. Partner organizations, namely the World Bank, the Indian Ocean Commission (IOC), the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF), the Nairobi Convention – UNEP, the Southern African Development Community (SADC), and the South West Indian Ocean Tuna Forum (SWIOTUNA) attended the meeting as SWIOFC Observers. Other Regional Fishery Bodies – the Southern Indian Ocean Fisheries Agreement (SIOFA) and the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission (IOTC)- actively participated in the discussion with members, specifically regarding SWIOFC compliance and reporting requirements.

    Patrice Talla, FAO Subregional Coordinator for Southern Africa, welcomed the participants and emphasized the importance of the WPCCTF as a platform for dialogue and collective action, underscoring the need for coastal states to manage tuna stocks responsibly within their Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZs) and to collaborate regionally to rebuild overexploited stocks, particularly yellowfin tuna. Talla stressed the importance of strengthening national capacities to comply with Conservation and Management Measures (CMMs) and to implement effective Monitoring, Control and Surveillance (MCS) systems.

    Mbuli Charles Boliko, FAO Representative in Madagascar, Comoros, Mauritius and Seychelles, highlighted the significance of the Indian Ocean as the second-largest tuna-producing region globally, playing a vital role in supporting national economies and livelihoods. Boliko stressed that challenges such as Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated (IUU) fishing, climate-induced migratory shifts, and external competition require a unified regional response grounded in science, cooperation, and shared commitment.

    The Working Party members acknowledged the progress made in the region, including the adoption and progressive implementation of the SWIOFC-led instrument, the MTC Guidelines, and the regional effort for jointly regulating and managing foreign fishing access for the best interest of the region. The MTC Guidelines (the Guidelines for Minimum Terms and Conditions for foreign fishing access) were officially adopted by all SWIOFC member countries in February 2019. WWF, a long-standing partner of the WPCCTF, presented recent work conducted on this subject, which was led by the Minimum Terms and Conditions Task Force (MTCTF) of the SWIOFC. This work received technical support from NFDS and focused on the joint and concerted actions required for the implementation of the priority provisions of the SWIOFC instrument, such as the provisions regulating licensing requirements, the use of Vessel Monitoring Systems (VMS), transshipments and compensations and access fees.

    Other subject thoroughly discussed was the cooperation between SWIOFC, SADC and IOC on regional Monitoring, Control and Surveillance (MCS) initiatives. The new workplan for 2025–2026 was adopted, and the WP formulated joint recommendations for the upcoming plenary session of the SWIOFC, scheduled to take place in November 2025.

    The event was supported by the SWIOFish5 TRANSFORM project, funded by the World Bank and implemented by IOC with technical assistance from FAO. The project, ending in 2030, has the objective of strengthening regional, evidence-based fisheries management in the region.

    – on behalf of Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO): Regional Office for Africa.

    Media files

    .

    MIL OSI Africa

  • MIL-OSI Africa: Guaranty Trust Holding Company Plc (GTCO Plc) Becomes the 1st Financial Services Institution in West Africa to Achieve Listing and Trading of its Ordinary Shares on the London Stock Exchange

    Source: APO – Report:

    Guaranty Trust Holding Company Plc (GTCO Plc) (www.GTCOPlc.com), Africa’s leading and most profitable Financial Services Group, has recorded a significant milestone in its growth and expansion journey with the successful admission of its Ordinary Shares to the Equity Shares (International Commercial Companies Secondary Listing) category of the Official List of the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and to trading on the main market for listed securities of the London Stock Exchange.

    This historic achievement makes GTCO Plc, the 1st Financial Services Institution in West Africa to dual list its Ordinary Shares on both the Nigerian and London stock exchanges, and subject to certain criteria, it is expected that the Shares will be transferrable between the two exchanges.

    The admission follows the successful pricing of its fully marketed offering (The Offering) on the London Stock Exchange to raise gross proceeds of $105million in exchange for 2.29 billion of new ordinary shares in the company, which was supported by a strong book of high-quality, long-term institutional investors.

    Concurrent with the Offering, the Company also gave notice of its intention to cancel the listing of its existing GDRs on the certificates representing certain securities (depositary receipts) category of the Official List of the United Kingdom Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) and the admission to trading of GDRs on the London Stock Exchange’s main market for listed securities.

    Building on the momentum of the successful first tranche of its equity capital raise programme in July 2024, which secured ₦209 billion, GTCO will deploy the proceeds from the Offering to strengthen its capital base, meet its recapitalization target, and fund strategic expansion across high-growth markets and priority sectors within and outside Nigeria.

    It is expected that Admission and unconditional dealing in the Shares will become effective on or before 8.00 a.m. (UK time) on 9 July 2025 under the ticker “GTHC”. Following the cancellation of the GDRs listing, the Company intends to change the ticker symbol for the Shares from “GTHC” to “GTCO” and will issue a separate announcement in due course to that effect.

    Commenting on the LSE Listing, the Group Chief Executive Officer of Guaranty Trust Holding Company Plc, Mr. Segun Agbaje, said: “Today marks a major milestone—not just for GTCO, but for the future we see for African financial institutions on the global stage. We are incredibly proud to be the 1st Financial Services Institution in West Africa to list our ordinary shares on London Stock Exchange’s main market for listed securities, and even more honored by the trust placed in us by the investing community. For us, this was not just about raising capital. It was about validating the strength of our franchise, the clarity of our strategy, and the discipline with which we execute.”

    He further said; “I would like to thank everyone who made this possible—our advisors and legal teams, our longstanding shareholders, the regulators both in Nigeria and in the UK, as well as the Nigerian government for creating an environment that supports our bold ambition and vision to be Africa’s leading financial services institution.”

    GTCO’s fully marketed offering attracted long-term institutional capital, reflecting investor confidence in the Group’s fundamentals, governance, and strategic outlook. It also signals improving market sentiment, buoyed by ongoing economic reforms by the Federal Government and a return to traditional orthodox monetary policy by the Central Bank of Nigeria, which have gone a long way to stabilising the macroeconomic environment and gradually restoring investor confidence in Nigeria’s long-term prospects.

    – on behalf of Guaranty Trust Holding Company Plc.

    About GTCO Plc:
    GTCO Plc is one of Africa’s leading financial services institutions with a longstanding track record of strong growth, service excellence, and shareholder returns. The Group operates across banking, payments, asset management, and pension administration in eleven countries, including Nigeria, the UK, and key African markets.

    Media files

    .

    MIL OSI Africa

  • MIL-OSI Africa: African Union Commission (AUC) Chairperson received His Excellency Mahamat Ali Hassan, Ambassador of Chad

    Source: APO – Report:

    .

    The Chairperson of the African Union Commission H.E. @ymahmoudali received H.E. Mahamat Ali Hassan, Ambassador of Chad to Ethiopia & Permanent Representative to the AU this morning. They discussed the political & humanitarian situation in the Sahel & Sudan, and the need for a diplomatic solution to these situations.

    The Chairperson expressed appreciation for Chad’s contributions & support to the African Union.

    – on behalf of African Union (AU).

    MIL OSI Africa

  • MIL-OSI Africa: The Government of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia and the World Bank Sign USD 1 Billion Financing Agreement to Support Economic Reform and Inclusive Growth

    Source: APO – Report:

    The Government of Ethiopia and the World Bank have signed a Financing Agreement amounting to USD 1 billion under the Second Sustainable and Inclusive Growth Development Policy Operation (DPO) in a grant and concessional loan.

    This critical operation reflects the World Bank’s continued commitment to supporting Ethiopia’s bold and far-reaching reform agenda. The program aims to bolster recent government efforts to ensure financial sector stability, enhance trade competitiveness, strengthen domestic resource mobilization, promote transparent and effective public sector governance, and ensure the sustainability of social services, all of which are integral pillars of Ethiopia’s macroeconomic and structural transformation.

    The Government of Ethiopia expresses its profound appreciation to the World Bank for its steadfast and constructive partnership in supporting reform priorities under the Homegrown Economic Reform Program. The support under this agreement underscores the strong and enduring collaboration between Ethiopia and the World Bank in pursuit of shared goals of inclusive and sustainable development.

    The Agreement was formally signed by H.E. Ato. Ahmed Shide, Minister of Finance, on behalf of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, and Ms. Maryam Salim, World Bank Division Director for Ethiopia, Eritrea, Sudan, and South Sudan, on behalf of the World Bank Group.

    – on behalf of Ministry of Finance, Ethiopia.

    Media files

    .

    MIL OSI Africa

  • MIL-OSI Video: Minister in The Presidency, Ms Ntshanvheni tables GCIS 2025/25 Budget Vote

    Source: Republic of South Africa (video statements)

    Minister in The Presidency, Ms Ntshanvheni tables GCIS 2025/25 Budget Vote

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4KxmIhoXQKM

    MIL OSI Video

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Briefing – Military mobility – 04-07-2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has drawn renewed attention to military mobility, highlighting the need for rapid cross-border movement of troops and equipment to strengthen deterrence and defence. Challenges such as outdated bridges, tunnels and railways, along with inconsistent regulations across EU Member States, impede swift military movements. Building on the first EU action plan on military mobility launched in 2018, the action plan on military mobility 2.0, adopted in November 2022, expands infrastructure upgrades, regulatory harmonisation and operational readiness. Two joint annual reports from the European Parliament and the Council show progress in implementing the action plans: €1.76 billion have funded 95 projects in 21 Member States, including €807 million in the latest round. The revised Regulation on the trans-European transport network (TEN-T) now legally recognises military mobility, and four strategic corridors have been identified in coordination with the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and the European External Action Service. Operational readiness has also improved through streamlined customs and transport procedures, enhanced fuel supply chains, and joint exercises, while partnerships with NATO and third countries have deepened. The March 2025 White Paper for European Defence – Readiness 2030 underscores military mobility as a critical enabler for EU security, identifying urgent investments, harmonised design standards, and regulatory reforms to remove persistent barriers and strengthen resilience of dual-use (civilian and military) infrastructure. However, the European Court of Auditors warns that funding remains insufficient, strategic focus is lacking, and project selection overlooks geopolitical priorities, while bureaucratic barriers remain. Persistent challenges include underfunding, fragmented procedures, limited strategic coherence, and the need for greater coordination with NATO. The European Parliament supports an integrated approach with harmonised regulations, increased dual-use investments, swift project implementation, greater partner participation under the permanent structured cooperation (PESCO), and a deepened partnership with NATO. At the same time, Parliament stresses the need for Europe to take greater responsibility for its own security.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: EU and Moldova forge deeper ties at historic first Summit in Chișinău

    Source: European Commission

    European Commission Press release Brussels, 04 Jul 2025 At the first ever EU-Moldova Summit in Chișinău, President of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Council António Costa and President of the Republic of Moldova Maia Sandu agreed to deepen cooperation in the interest of EU and Moldovan citizens.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Reported environmental and human rights abuses of EU steel companies in non-EU countries and the need to uphold the CSDDD’s objective – E-002596/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002596/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Majdouline Sbai (Verts/ALE), Marie Toussaint (Verts/ALE), Elisabeth Grossmann (S&D), Virginijus Sinkevičius (Verts/ALE), Marina Mesure (The Left), Catarina Vieira (Verts/ALE), Benedetta Scuderi (Verts/ALE), Maria Ohisalo (Verts/ALE), Nora Mebarek (S&D), David Cormand (Verts/ALE), Mélissa Camara (Verts/ALE), Mounir Satouri (Verts/ALE), Tilly Metz (Verts/ALE), Saskia Bricmont (Verts/ALE), Thomas Waitz (Verts/ALE), Estelle Ceulemans (S&D), Per Clausen (The Left), Manon Aubry (The Left), Sara Matthieu (Verts/ALE), Anja Hazekamp (The Left), Cristina Guarda (Verts/ALE), Anthony Smith (The Left), Lena Schilling (Verts/ALE), Ana Miranda Paz (Verts/ALE), Michael Bloss (Verts/ALE), Hanna Gedin (The Left), Jean-Marc Germain (S&D)

    As stated by the Commission, ‘certain EU companies have [had] adverse human rights and environmental impacts … in their value chains [including] forced labour, exploitation of workers, pollution … or biodiversity loss’. Many of these abuses have been widely documented by NGOs, in the case of ArcelorMittal and Ternium activities in non-EU countries. They are complemented by threats, disappearances – such as that of Antonio Díaz Valencia – and killings of community defenders and environmental activists, land grabbing and negative health impacts. As a recent study suggests, the steel plant in Rio de Janeiro has led to over one thousand deaths.

    In the light of both this and the recent Commission proposal for an omnibus on the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD), how does the Commission intend to:

    • 1.uphold the application of Article 2 TEU and Article 191 TFEU, as their objectives require the involvement not only of public authorities, but also of companies?
    • 2.prevent fragmentation and provide legal certainty for businesses operating in the internal market?
    • 3.uphold the key provisions of the CSDDD to avoid ending up with an empty shell, and thus to remain consistent with its own declaration that the EU can ‘no longer turn a blind eye to what happens down our value chains’?

    Submitted: 26.6.2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – EU rules are curbing people’s freedoms and crushing their dreams – E-002594/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002594/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Charlie Weimers (ECR), Beatrice Timgren (ECR), Dick Erixon (ECR)

    In an open letter, Camilla describes how the EU requirements regarding daily rest periods are clashing with a Swedish law (‘the LSS’) designed to ensure that people with disabilities are offered support and services.[1]

    The aim of the LSS is to make sure that people with disabilities can live as dignified and independent a life as possible. Camilla lives in accommodation provided under the LSS and, as a result, the EU rules are having a negative impact on her. If she needs to travel, she can’t get an assistant to accompany her, especially if an overnight stay is required.

    The Commission’s reinterpretation of the EU rules is having an adverse impact on many Swedes. Camilla describes how the EU has taken away her freedom to go on longer trips, and in her new circumstances she feels like she’s ‘in a cage’. It’s become more difficult to do what she’s always dreamt of doing. Camilla says that the world that people with disabilities live in getting smaller and smaller, and because of the EU, they are becoming even more isolated and faring worse.

    The staff at Camilla’s accommodation and other people working as LSS assistants share her concerns. Camilla says they think the EU rules are hampering their flexibility and their ability to brighten up people’s daily lives.

    Camilla ends her letter by expressing her wish for the rules to be changed to bring more flexibility and to make it possible to meet people’s needs under the LSS system.

    • 1.Is the Commission aware of the ways in which EU rules are affecting the quality of life of people with disabilities?
    • 2.Does the Commission take the view that the current rules are in line with the EU’s Charter of Fundamental Rights, which states that people with disabilities have a right to live independently, to have a job and to be part of the community?
    • 3.Is the Commission going to review the rules with a view to addressing the problems with 24-hour shift work?

    Submitted: 26.6.2025

    • [1] https://www.na.se/2025-06-20/oppet-brev-till-eu-ledamoterna-och-politiker-om-dygnsvila
    Last updated: 4 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Methodical killing of stray animals in Romania and potential misuse of EU funds – E-002593/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002593/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Sebastian Everding (The Left), Anja Hazekamp (The Left), Manuela Ripa (PPE), Sirpa Pietikäinen (PPE), Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă (NI), Emil Radev (PPE), Friedrich Pürner (NI), Tilly Metz (Verts/ALE), Merja Kyllönen (The Left), Emma Fourreau (The Left), Tomáš Kubín (PfE)

    There is a well-founded suspicion that EU funding is being severely misused in Romania, where stray dogs are being killed systematically by privately run organisations financed by the Romanian government. The resources used for these operations are EU funds received to protect animals.

    In several counties, local authorities regularly conclude contracts with private organisations whose business model is based on the methodical killing of stray animals. In 2024 alone, 3 871 dogs were captured, of which 3 286 were killed. These operations generated revenues in excess of RON 2.7 million.

    • 1.Does the Commission plan to undertake an immediate, independent investigation into the use of EU funds in connection with the killing of stray animals in Romania?
    • 2.Since animal welfare is expressly enshrined in Article 13 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, is the Commission prepared to make sure that no form of applicable EU funding is used for the killing of stray animals, but can only be used for the humane management of stray animals, such as castration/sterilisation programmes, public education campaigns and the funding of non-profit shelters?
    • 3.Could the Commission specifically confirm that EU funding has not been used for the killing of stray animals under the pretext of the Animal Health Law delegated act on the eradication of infectious diseases[1]?

    Submitted: 26.6.2025

    • [1] Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687 of 17 December 2019 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2016/429 of the European Parliament and the Council, as regards rules for the prevention and control of certain listed diseases (OJ L 174, 3.6.2020, p. 64, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2020/687/oj).
    Last updated: 4 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the human cost of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the urgent need to end Russian aggression: the situation of illegally detained civilians and prisoners of war, and the continued bombing of civilians – RC-B10-0304/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Michael Gahler, Andrzej Halicki, Sebastião Bugalho, David McAllister, Siegfried Mureşan, Isabel Wiseler‑Lima, Nicolás Pascual de la Parte, Mika Aaltola, Wouter Beke, Krzysztof Brejza, Lena Düpont, Jan Farský, Mircea‑Gheorghe Hava, Rasa Juknevičienė, Sandra Kalniete, Ewa Kopacz, Andrey Kovatchev, Reinhold Lopatka, Antonio López‑Istúriz White, Liudas Mažylis, Danuše Nerudová, Mirosława Nykiel, Ana Miguel Pedro, Paulius Saudargas, Oliver Schenk, Michał Szczerba, Davor Ivo Stier, Alice Teodorescu Måwe, Ingeborg Ter Laak, Riho Terras, Matej Tonin, Pekka Toveri, Inese Vaidere
    on behalf of the PPE Group
    Yannis Maniatis, Nacho Sánchez Amor, Thijs Reuten
    on behalf of the S&D Group
    Adam Bielan, Michał Dworczyk, Małgorzata Gosiewska, Sebastian Tynkkynen, Roberts Zīle, Reinis Pozņaks, Ivaylo Valchev, Aurelijus Veryga, Mariusz Kamiński, Charlie Weimers, Alexandr Vondra, Assita Kanko, Joachim Stanisław Brudziński
    on behalf of the ECR Group
    Petras Auštrevičius, Malik Azmani, Dan Barna, Anna‑Maja Henriksson, Ľubica Karvašová, Ilhan Kyuchyuk, Nathalie Loiseau, Urmas Paet, Marie‑Agnes Strack‑Zimmermann, Eugen Tomac, Hilde Vautmans, Lucia Yar, Dainius Žalimas
    on behalf of the Renew Group
    Sergey Lagodinsky
    on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

    European Parliament resolution on the human cost of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the urgent need to end Russian aggression: the situation of illegally detained civilians and prisoners of war, and the continued bombing of civilians

    (2025/2710(RSP))

    The European Parliament,

     having regard to its previous resolutions on Ukraine and on Russia,

     having regard to the Hague Conventions, the UN Charter, the Geneva Conventions and their additional protocols, the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, the European Convention on Human Rights, the UN Convention Against Torture, the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC) and the UN Convention on the rights of the child,

     having regard to the Association Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Ukraine, of the other part[1], and to the accompanying Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area between the European Union and Ukraine, signed in 2014,

     having regard to all relevant resolutions by the UN General Assembly and Security Council, in particular UN General Assembly Resolution ES-11/7 adopted on 25 February 2025,

     having regard to the NATO Washington Summit Declaration of 10 July 2024 and the Hague Summit Declaration of 25 June 2025,

     having regard to Rule 136(2) of its Rules of Procedure,

    A. whereas Russia has been waging a brutal, illegal, unprovoked and unjustified full-scale war of aggression against Ukraine since 24 February 2022;

    B. whereas Russia’s aggression against Ukraine did not begin in February 2022, but in 2014, with the illegal occupation and annexation of Crimea and parts of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions, with severe humanitarian, economic and ecological consequences and resulting in regional instability; whereas Russia could stop the brutal and unjustified war of aggression at any time;

    C. whereas the UN General Assembly, in its resolution of 2 March 2022, immediately qualified the Russian war against Ukraine as an act of aggression in violation of Article 2(4) of the UN Charter, and, in its resolution of 14 November 2022, recognised the need to hold Russia accountable for its war of aggression and legally and financially responsible for its internationally wrongful acts, including by making reparation for the injuries and damage caused;

    D. whereas thus far in 2025, Russia has deployed over 20 000 drones against Ukraine, or around 3 500 per month, representing a 350 % increase compared to the 2024 monthly average; whereas Russia has killed over 1 050 civilians and injured 4 300 more, constituting clear evidence that it actively targets civilians, including ambulances and rescue personnel, in contrast to Ukraine’s defensive actions; whereas the recent attacks on Kyiv and Dnipro were the second deadliest and the deadliest attacks on these cities since the start of Russia’s invasion, starkly conflicting with Russia’s claims that it is interested in peace;

    E. whereas, as a reaction to Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, the EU has adopted 17 sanctions packages of unprecedented scope against Russia and continues to adopt sanctions against Russia with a view to definitively undermining its capacity to continue waging its illegal war of aggression against Ukraine; whereas the circumvention of sanctions, including through Russia’s shadow fleet and the incomplete implementation of sanctions, remain a major enabler of Russia’s war of aggression; whereas despite these and other sanctions, Russia continues to wage its war of aggression against Ukraine;

    F. whereas the US has again halted supplies of crucial military assistance to Ukraine;

    G. whereas Russia’s aggression against Ukraine has caused the largest forced displacement of civilians in Europe since the Second World War, with 10 million Ukrainians – mostly women and children – displaced, including 7 million who have found refuge abroad[2];

    H. whereas Russia continues unabated to commit heinous war crimes against innocent civilians; whereas according to the Ukrainian authorities, approximately 16 000 Ukrainian civilians are known to be currently detained in Russia and the temporarily occupied Ukrainian territories, although the real figures are likely to be significantly higher; whereas more than 70 000 Ukrainians – including civilians, children, and military personnel – are officially listed as missing;

    I. whereas the Russian authorities have systematically carried out enforced disappearances against large numbers of Ukrainian civilians, detaining individuals with no military affiliation on baseless and fabricated charges, with their fate and whereabouts remaining unknown, leaving their families in agonising uncertainty; whereas enforced disappearances by Russia are part of a widespread, systematic and coordinated assault on Ukraine’s civilian population;

    J. whereas, according to the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, at least 29 civilians have died in custody in Russian detention facilities, and 170 have been executed in areas under Russian control since February 2022;

    K. whereas throughout the process of enforced disappearances, the Russian authorities have consistently failed to inform the families of the fate or location of their loved ones; whereas multiple responses from various authorities have likewise failed to provide any meaningful information;

    L. whereas the Russian authorities have systematically employed torture and other forms of inhumane and degrading treatment against numerous illegally detained Ukrainian civilians; whereas the UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry on Ukraine has found evidence of Russia using rape and sexual violence as means of torture against both male and female detainees;

    M. whereas Russia refuses to disclose the number of Ukrainian prisoners of war (POWs) it currently holds; whereas the Russian authorities are blatantly failing to meet their obligations under the Geneva Conventions to allow international representatives of the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) to visit prisoners and to transmit the relevant information to the ICRC, state authorities and the families of POWs;

    N. whereas Ukrainian POWs and civilian captives are subjected to torture, including starvation, beatings, various types of coercion, physical, sexual and psychological violence and denial of medical care and legal representation;

    O. whereas Ukraine and international bodies have documented hundreds of executions of Ukrainian POWs by Russian forces since February 2022; whereas the Office of the Prosecutor General of Ukraine is investigating the execution of 268 Ukrainian POWs (208 on the battlefield and 59 in the ‘Olenivka’ prison); whereas the increasing number of executions and available evidence suggests that these crimes are not isolated incidents but part of a systematic and deliberate policy, constituting serious violations of international law and human rights, and war crimes under the Geneva Conventions and the Rome Statute;

    P. whereas Ukraine and Russia have conducted 65 prisoner exchanges since February 2022, resulting in the release of 5 757 people, including three large-scale exchanges in May 2025, with an additional 469 individuals released outside formal exchange mechanisms;

    Q. whereas since the occupation and annexation of Crimea in 2014, Russia has systematically targeted Crimean Tatars with politically motivated prosecutions, enforced disappearances, intimidation and harassment; whereas Crimean Tatar leaders, journalists, civil society activists and religious figures have faced disproportionate repression, including under the guise of anti-extremism and anti-terrorism charges; whereas these actions amount to violations of international human rights and humanitarian law and aim to erase the identity and presence of the indigenous Crimean Tatar people;

    R. whereas Russia, while posturing as a defender of the Christian faith and values, has been conducting mass and systematic violations of religious rights in occupied Ukrainian territories, with the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church banned outright, at least 47 Ukrainian religious leaders killed and more subjected to torture, and religious property willingly targeted and destroyed by Russian forces; whereas in parallel Russia weaponises the Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate as a tool to tyrannise and control religious communities and the Ukrainian population more broadly;

    S. whereas the torture and killing of Ukrainian journalist Viktoriia Roshchyna in Russian captivity highlights the grave and growing dangers faced by Ukrainian journalists held by Russian forces; whereas others, including Iryna Danylovych, Dmytro Khyliuk, Iryna Levchenko and Heorhiy Levchenko, remain in detention under life-threatening conditions;

    T. whereas according to the ‘Bring Kids Back UA’ initiative and the Yale Humanitarian Research Lab (HRL), since February 2022 around at least 20 000 and possibly up to 35 000 Ukrainian children have been forcibly deported to Russia and Belarus or detained in temporarily occupied Ukrainian territories, with only 1 366 returned and 637 confirmed dead; whereas the real figures are assumed to be much higher, as these transfers and deportations continue; whereas the HRL’s Ukraine Conflict Observatory has had its funding cut as of 1 July by the Trump administration, jeopardising the continuation of its work;

    U. whereas the ICC has been conducting an investigation into the situation in Ukraine since 2 March 2022 and on 17 March 2023 issued arrest warrants for Vladimir Putin, President of the Russian Federation, and Maria Lvova-Belova, so-called Commissioner for Children’s Rights in the Office of the President of the Russian Federation, for the war crime of unlawful deportation of Ukrainian children, followed up by additional arrest warrants against Russian officials issued on 24 June 2024; whereas the EU supports the Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression that is being established in the framework of the Council of Europe;

    1. Condemns, in the strongest possible terms, Russia’s unprovoked, illegal and unjustified war of aggression against Ukraine; demands that Russia immediately cease all military activities in Ukraine, fully withdraw from Ukraine’s internationally recognised territory, end forced deportations, release all detained and deported Ukrainians and compensate Ukraine and victims of war crimes; reiterates its condemnation of Belarus’s direct involvement in Russia’s brutal war of aggression against Ukraine;

    2. Confirms its unwavering commitment to the independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine, within its internationally recognised borders and reiterates its policy of non-recognition of Ukrainian territories temporarily occupied by Russia; strongly underlines Ukraine’s inherent right to self-defence, in line with Article 51 of the UN Charter, which entails the right to strike military targets on Russian soil;

    3. Reaffirms its unwavering solidarity with the people of Ukraine in their heroic defence of their nation, their land, and our shared European values; reiterates its belief that a strong, independent and democratic Ukraine is vital for Europe’s security, stability and prosperity; calls for the EU and all its 27 Member States to substantially enhance the effectiveness and accelerate the delivery of military support to Ukraine in order to allow Ukraine to legitimately defend itself against Russia’s escalating attacks on cities and civilian infrastructure across the country, and to put Ukraine in the strongest possible position for negotiations;

    4. Condemns Vladimir Putin’s ongoing revisionist and imperialist rhetoric and ideology, and treacherous propaganda; denounces the systematic attempts by the Russian Government to erase Ukraine’s history, culture, language and identity;

    5. Stresses that Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine has shattered peace and stability in Europe and gravely undermined global security; underscores that Russia remains the most significant and direct threat to European security;

    6. Strongly condemns the execution of Ukrainian POWs by Russian forces, constituting war crimes and grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions;

    7. Reiterates that Russia bears sole responsibility for its war of aggression and that there can be no impunity for violations of human rights, war crimes, or other breaches of international law committed by Russian forces and officials; expresses deep outrage at Russia’s brutal attacks on civilians and the indiscriminate targeting of civilian infrastructure; stresses that the systematic and deliberate targeting of civilians and, in particular, the deportation of children may constitute a genocidal strategy orchestrated and executed by the Russian Government;

    8. Fully supports the ICC’s ongoing investigations into the war crimes and crimes against humanity committed by Russia; welcomes the recent agreement between the Council of Europe and Ukraine on the establishment of a Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression against Ukraine; emphasises that all those responsible for war crimes perpetrated in Ukraine must be held accountable and stresses that justice is essential for any sustainable peace; expresses its utmost concern about the US sanctions on the ICC and its prosecutors, judges and staff, which undermine all its ongoing investigative and prosecutorial work and constitute a serious attack on the system of international justice; calls on the Commission to urgently activate the Blocking Statute and on the Member States to urgently step up their diplomatic efforts in order to protect and safeguard the ICC as an indispensable cornerstone of the system of international justice;

    9. Reiterates its condemnation of Russia’s forcible deportation, illegal detention and inhumane treatment of countless Ukrainian civilians; demands that Russia immediately provide families with accurate information regarding the whereabouts and state of health of detainees and calls for the immediate release of all the Ukrainian civilians currently held captive by the Russian authorities; underscores that the forced displacement, unlawful detention and mistreatment of Ukrainian civilians exemplify the intrinsic brutality of the Russian regime and its flagrant disregard for human life; strongly condemns the gruesome tactics deployed by the Russian authorities against both Ukrainian civilians and prisoners of war; deplores the wide and systematic use of terror in Ukraine’s occupied territories, aimed at intimidating the civilian population, stifling resistance and political dissent, suppressing civic activism and eradicating the Ukrainian language and national identity;

    10. Condemns the ongoing persecution of Crimean Tatars in illegally occupied Crimea, including politically motivated detentions, torture, enforced disappearances and restrictions on freedom of religion, expression and association; calls for the immediate release of all Crimean Tatars imprisoned on political grounds and urges the EU and international organisations to enhance monitoring and advocacy on behalf of the indigenous people of Crimea;

    11. Urges Russia to immediately agree to and implement a comprehensive ‘all-for-all’ exchange of POWs with Ukraine, in accordance with its obligations under international humanitarian law and the Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War;

    12. Strongly condemns Russia’s violent actions and the complicity of Belarus in the mistreatment of Ukrainian children, including murder, torture and criminal prosecution, forced transfer and deportation, sexual abuse and exploitation, forced Russification and militarisation; denounces the forced imposition of Russian citizenship on deported children and their state-sponsored adoption by Russian families as part of a deliberate policy of forced assimilation; regrets that the EU was unable to help Yale’s HRL secure sufficient funding; calls on its Member States to closely cooperate with and support the Ukrainian authorities and local and international non-governmental organisations in their efforts to document all missing and deported Ukrainian children, determine their whereabouts and repatriate them in order to promptly reunite them with their parents or legal guardians; reiterates that the deportation of Ukrainian children is a grave violation of international humanitarian law, in particular of Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention, and constitutes a war crime; urges the EU to hold those responsible to account and to sanction individuals and entities implicated in these crimes;

    13. Demands that, in line with its obligations under the respective Geneva Conventions, Russia grant the ICRC immediate access to POW camps and other sites where Ukrainian soldiers or civilians are being held captive; notes the marked difference in the way Ukraine and Russia have treated the POWs they hold, with Ukrainian military personnel having been severely tortured, maltreated and malnourished, in violation of the laws of war and international humanitarian law;

    14. Reiterates its call for the EU and its Member States to increase humanitarian and rehabilitation assistance for victims of Russian captivity, including access to medical and psychological care, reintegration services and legal assistance; commends Ukrainian and international civil society organisations for supporting families of abducted Ukrainian children, POWs and illegally detained civilians;

    15. Reaffirms the EU’s steadfast commitment to the reconstruction of Ukraine and reiterates its readiness to contribute to rebuilding Ukraine’s economy and infrastructure; stresses the strategic importance of the Ukraine Facility in reinforcing Ukraine’s resilience, accelerating its recovery, and supporting its path towards sustainable development and EU membership; reiterates its firm conviction that Russia must pay for the massive damage caused in Ukraine and therefore calls for the confiscation of Russian state assets immobilised under EU sanctions or otherwise for their use to support Ukraine’s defence and reconstruction; underlines its conviction that various legal pathways to do so are available and that lack of action is an inexcusable failure on the part of European governments;

    16. Condemns the Russian State Duma’s protocol adopted on 24 June 2025 allowing the member states of the Collective Security Treaty Organization to deploy their troops on the territory of other members in the event of armed conflict, threats, crisis situations and military exercises; condemns this step as a clear attempt by Russia to further scale up its relentless attacks on Ukraine by forcibly mobilising troops from neighbouring and allied states;

    17. Strongly condemns the recruitment and deployment of Cuban soldiers in addition to the involvement of North Korean troops;

    18. Urges all Member States to immediately provide further military assistance and to engage in joint procurement of additional capabilities, in particular air defence, long range strike and artillery systems and ammunition; in that regard, urges all Member States to devote a significant part of their SAFE Defence Investment Plans to assistance for Ukraine; urges the Member States and their defence industries to invest in and partner with the Ukrainian defence industry, including through additional investments and setting up joint ventures, in order to maximise the full potential of its production capabilities to produce critical equipment in the most efficient way;

    19. Recalls the bold statements by several EU Heads of State and Government that Russia’s failure to agree to the US-proposed 30-day ceasefire would be met with severely enhanced sanctions and therefore urges the Council, the Commission and the Member States to follow-up on their declarations and substantially increase the effectiveness and impact of sanctions on Russia; welcomes the seventeenth sanctions package of 20 May 2025 but urges the Member States to adopt the next sanctions package without further delay; underlines that there is a current strategic imperative to act boldly now; stresses that the negative global security and economic consequences of any future Russian aggression far outweigh the military and financial commitment needed today to definitively end Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, to deter further Russian aggression and achieve a just, fair and lasting peace; resolutely calls on the EU Member States to stop their shameful business as usual approach and instead act with a renewed sense of urgency and purpose;

    20. Believes that in order to pressure Russia to end its war of aggression, beginning with a sustained ceasefire, substantially more effective military, economic, political and diplomatic efforts and measures must be applied by the EU and like-minded partners; calls for all necessary steps to be taken to avoid the circumvention of sanctions, in particular by targeting Russia’s ‘shadow fleet’ vessels; calls for a full ban on Russian liquefied natural gas (LNG), oil and raw materials, and interim measures to minimise Russia’s ability to pay for its war of aggression through energy exports, including a lower oil price cap and the introduction of an LNG price cap; underlines the importance of adopting the 18th sanctions package without further delay; calls on the Member States that are blocking the adoption of the latest sanctions package to follow other Member States, which have successfully found alternative sources for oil and gas deliveries; underlines that it is unacceptable that, in the fourth year of Russia’s full-scale war against Ukraine, Russian missiles and unmanned aerial vehicles used in attacks continue to rely heavily on Western-manufactured components;

    21. Recalls that the overall support for Ukraine must be sufficient to stop Russia’s war of aggression and allow Ukraine to liberate all its people, re-establish full control over its territory within its internationally recognised borders and deter any further aggression by Russia; recalls that Europe has already supported Ukraine with EUR 50 billion in military aid, but underlines that further assistance is required and that such support now depends largely on Europe itself; urges the Member States to provide more arms and ammunition to Ukraine before any negotiations are concluded; denounces any attempts to pressure Ukraine to cede occupied territory, in which the population is exposed to continued repression, violence, forced disappearances, illegal detentions, deportations and other forms of systematic terror;

    22. Calls on the EU to impose personal sanctions against Russian officials responsible for violence and torture against imprisoned and detained Ukrainians;

    23. Expresses its full support for a just and lasting peace in Ukraine, based on terms determined by Ukraine and acceptable to its people; stresses that any agreement must uphold Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, prevent Russia from rearming and guarantee Ukraine’s long-term security; insists on accountability for war crimes and on reparations; underlines that peace negotiations must be preceded by an unconditional ceasefire;

    24. Stresses that in the light of the shift in the US stance on Russia’s war of aggression, the EU and its Member States must remain Ukraine’s primary strategic allies and should reinforce their leadership role in supporting Ukraine’s struggle for sovereignty, peace and justice; calls for the EU and its Member States to work towards maintaining the broadest possible international support for Ukraine, including through building coalitions with like-minded non-EU partners;

    25. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, the Council, the Commission, the governments and parliaments of the Member States, the Council of Europe, the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, the President, Government and Parliament of Ukraine, and to the authorities of Russia and Belarus.

     

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Appointment of Filippo Ferri as head of Monza and Brianza Police – E-002590/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002590/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Ilaria Salis (The Left), Mimmo Lucano (The Left), Benedetta Scuderi (Verts/ALE), Cristina Guarda (Verts/ALE)

    Filippo Ferri was recently appointed head of the Monza and Brianza State Police, despite receiving a final sentence in 2012 for aggravated forgery in relation to the violent raid on the Diaz school during the G8 meeting in Genoa in 2001.

    This appointment raises questions about the effectiveness of accountability mechanisms for officials involved in serious human rights violations and the implications for the credibility of democratic institutions.

    In view of its role in ensuring compliance with Article 2 TEU and in accordance with the European Code of Police Ethics:

    • 1.Does the Commission consider it compatible with EU standards on the rule of law and the protection of fundamental rights to assign individuals convicted of abuses of power and serious human rights violations to top roles in law enforcement agencies?
    • 2.Does it intend to push for the introduction, at national or European level, of enhanced integrity and ethical verification procedures for appointments to senior security forces, including binding or advisory opinions from independent human rights bodies?

    Submitted: 26.6.2025

    Last updated: 4 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Public procurement: when Brussels finances a company penalised for dumping – E-002587/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002587/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Virginie Joron (PfE)

    In 2016, the Commission imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty of 4 % on imports of tubes and pipes of ductile cast iron originating in India. On 22 November 2023, Ursula von der Leyen and her administration decided to impose anti-dumping duties of 16 % on Electrosteel. According to the Commission, this Indian company has a 30 % share of the water pipe market in France and benefits from export subsidies of 6 % at home[1].

    The Commission found evidence that the weight of the goods had been misreported. Despite the fact that correct reporting of weights is essential to ensure that dumping margins are accurately calculated, the Commission has refused to check the previous imports for possible fraud and recover any duties not collected since 2016.

    • 1.By underreporting the weight of its pipes, the company evaded the duties it should have paid. Why has the Commission refused to carry out an investigation and recover the cost of this fraud?
    • 2.One project in Isère – funded by Brussels and the Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes Region, and valued at EUR 8 million – has purchased pipes from this non-EU company[2]. Why is the Commission financing a non-EU company that has committed subsidy fraud and that it has penalised for dumping?
    • 3.Why does the Commission not prohibit, in EU public procurement, purchases of products from non-EU companies found to have engaged in dumping or fraud?

    Submitted: 26.6.2025

    • [1] Recitals 4, 80, 168, 209 and 233 of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/2605 of 22 November 2023: countervailing duty of 9 % and anti-dumping duty of 7 %, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/FR/TXT/PDF/?uri=OJ:L_202302605.
    • [2] Albenc – https://caeau.fr/creation-du-reseau-d-irrigation-asl-d-irrigation-de-l-albenc-38; https://www.linkedin.com/posts/cabinet-ca-eau_retour-sur-le-projet-dirrigation-des-terres-activity-7155144143210446848-X7rJ/?originalSubdomain=fr.
    Last updated: 4 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Self-care facilities for persons with disabilities – E-002588/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002588/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Loucas Fourlas (PPE)

    The autonomy of persons with disabilities is fundamental to social inclusion and equality. Nevertheless, many persons with disabilities continue to face daily barriers to accessing technological tools and services that could enhance their self-care and reduce their dependency on others. In several Member States there are delays in the provision of relevant allowances, poor awareness and/or a lack of harmonised strategies to facilitate the autonomy of persons with disabilities.

    Given that independent living is an objective of the EU strategy for the rights of persons with disabilities 2021-2030, will the Commission say:

    • 1.What measures does it intend to take to enhance persons with disabilities’ access to self-care technologies?
    • 2.Is there any plan to create a European mechanism to co-finance or subsidise such solutions?
    • 3.How is fair treatment and equal access for persons with severe disabilities guaranteed in the Member States?

    Submitted: 26.6.2025

    Last updated: 4 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Proportion of college and university students focusing on STEM subjects – E-002581/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002581/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Barbara Bonte (PfE)

    The proportion of college and university students choosing STEM subjects is a good indicator of future innovativeness.

    • 1.How has this proportion evolved in the EU in recent years?
    • 2.How does the EU compare to its biggest economic rivals, namely China and the United States, in this respect?
    • 3.How does the Commission explain this evolution?

    Submitted: 26.6.2025

    Last updated: 4 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Huge risks from the ‘death cauldrons’ in Drapetsona, Keratsini and Perama – E-002585/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002585/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Lefteris Nikolaou-Alavanos (NI)

    High concentrations of heavy metals are being observed in patients from Drapetsona, Keratsini and Perama – a significant factor in the development of cancer, mainly of the lung. Measurements by the ‘Demokritos’ National Centre for Scientific Research confirm that the air is contaminated with volatile sulphur compounds from the processing and combustion of petroleum products and, on certain days, recorded benzene levels also exceed the mean limit value for the protection of human health. The risk of a large-scale industrial accident is ever-present, especially given that there are no mass escape routes for residents and the four petroleum facilities in Perama and ‘Oil One’ in Drapetsona are located in residential areas.

    In view of the above:

    • 1.What is the Commission’s position on the urgent need to implement the demands of unions and organised bodies for the immediate relocation of over 100 oil and other toxic substance tanks located within the urban fabric of Perama, the installation of ‘Oil One’ in Drapetsona and the return of all areas to the people, for use based on the modern needs of the people?
    • 2.What is the Commission’s position on the fact that the continued operation of the ‘Oil One’ facilities in Drapetsona and the suggested change of use of the already dangerous ‘ETEKA’ tank in Perama, under the responsibility of the EU and governments, exposes the people of the region to incalculable risks?
    • 3.What is the Commission’s position on the fact that there is no comprehensive plan for the prevention of and response to large-scale accidents rooted in the protection of workers, residents and the environment?

    Submitted: 26.6.2025

    Last updated: 4 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Latest news – Meeting of the Delegation on 09/07 at 17h00-18h30 in Strasbourg – Delegation for relations with Palestine

    Source: European Parliament

    The next meeting of the Delegation for Relations with Palestine will take place on Wednesday, 9 July 2025, 17.00-18.30, in Strasbourg, (Room CHURCHILL 200).

    The main issue in the agenda will be an exchange of views on the resource theft and humanitarian needs (including the right to water) in the Occupied Palestinian Territories with

    · Ms Rasha Abu Dayyeh, PENGON Head of Advocacy;

    · Ms Bushra Khalidi, from Oxfam’s Policy lead in the Occupied Palestinian Territory and Gaza;

    · Mr Monther Shoblaq, Director General of the Coastal Municipalities Water Utility, Gaza.

    The meeting will be web-streamed through the European Parliament’s Multimedia Centre.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Verification of radioactive waste off the Galician coast – E-002599/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002599/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Ana Miranda Paz (Verts/ALE)

    In its answers to my questions (E‑000725/2019[1] and E‑002829/2019[2]), and in its answer to a question posed by my group (E‑004684/2020[3]), the Commission admitted that there is nuclear waste off the Galician coast, although it has acknowledged it was not in possession of updated studies on the impact of this, and multiple times has postponed the monitoring of marine radioactivity in Galician waters.

    However, it has recently been brought to our attention that a French oceanographic expedition (the Nodssum mission) moved to the relevant area (located almost one thousand kilometres from the Galician coast) and has already located off the Galician coast over one thousand of the more than 220 000 barrels containing radioactive material that were dumped there between 1940 and 1985.

    Considering the above:

    • 1.Is the Commission aware of these interventions?
    • 2.Bearing in mind that the European Union did not do its work after the Commission included the monitoring of marine radioactivity on the Galician coast in the verification mission programme for 2020, pursuant to Article 35, what steps does the Commission plan to take in this regard? Will the Commission conduct its own study on the state of the nuclear waste deposited off the Galician coast?

    Submitted: 26.6.2025

    • [1] https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-8-2019-000725_EN.html
    • [2] https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-9-2019-002829_EN.html
    • [3] https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-9-2020-004684_EN.html
    Last updated: 4 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – New studies confirming carcinogenic effects of long-term exposure to glyphosate at relevant levels – E-002611/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002611/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Christophe Clergeau (S&D), Cristina Guarda (Verts/ALE), Estelle Ceulemans (S&D), Romana Jerković (S&D), Sirpa Pietikäinen (PPE), Eero Heinäluoma (S&D), Sakis Arnaoutoglou (S&D), André Rodrigues (S&D), Nora Mebarek (S&D), Tilly Metz (Verts/ALE), Jutta Paulus (Verts/ALE), Marie Toussaint (Verts/ALE), Majdouline Sbai (Verts/ALE), Mélissa Camara (Verts/ALE), Mounir Satouri (Verts/ALE), Christel Schaldemose (S&D), Rasmus Nordqvist (Verts/ALE), Villy Søvndal (Verts/ALE), Aurore Lalucq (S&D), Emil Radev (PPE), Jean-Marc Germain (S&D), Anja Hazekamp (The Left), Marta Temido (S&D), Manon Aubry (The Left), Günther Sidl (S&D), Maria Noichl (S&D), Elisabeth Grossmann (S&D), Jussi Saramo (The Left), Thomas Pellerin-Carlin (S&D), Katarína Roth Neveďalová (NI), Martin Häusling (Verts/ALE), Sara Matthieu (Verts/ALE)

    In 2023, the Commission renewed the approval of the active substance glyphosate for use in plant protection products for a period of 10 years. This followed the conclusion by the ECHA that glyphosate does not meet the criteria to be classified as carcinogenic, mutagenic or toxic for reproduction, and an assessment by the EFSA, which did not identify any critical areas of concern. This was despite ongoing concerns and warnings from the scientific community about glyphosate’s toxicity, the 2015 classification by the IARC of glyphosate as a ‘probable carcinogen’, and the EFSA’s acknowledgement of a ‘high’ long-term toxicity risk to mammals, the developmental neurotoxic potential of glyphosate formulations, and the risk to biodiversity and impact on the microbiome. Moreover, the representative formulation has not been tested in any long-term toxicity or carcinogenicity study.

    On 10 June 2025, a new peer-reviewed study[1] by the Ramazzini Institute was published and confirmed the carcinogenic effects of long-term exposure from prenatal life to glyphosate and glyphosate-based herbicides, including the European representative formulation, at levels considered ‘safe’ (ADI to NOAEL; 0.5 to 50 mg/kg exposure).

    In the light of this new scientific evidence, will the Commission:

    • 1.task the EFSA and the ECHA with a review of their risk assessments of glyphosate?
    • 2.launch a review of approval procedure under Article 21 of Regulation (EU) 1107/2009?

    Submitted: 27.6.2025

    • [1] https://ehjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12940-025-01187-2.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Protecting the common agricultural policy (CAP) in the multiannual financial framework – E-002592/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002592/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Anna Maria Cisint (PfE), Susanna Ceccardi (PfE), Aldo Patriciello (PfE), Silvia Sardone (PfE), Isabella Tovaglieri (PfE)

    Commission communication COM(2025) 46 final, entitled ‘The road to the next multiannual financial framework’, reveals the Commission’s intention to merge the common agricultural policy (CAP) into a single fund together with the cohesion policies. Such a serious move would irreversibly undermine the CAP’s historical, strategic and social function.

    The CAP is not like the other sectoral funds: it ensures food sovereignty, territorial cohesion and agricultural sustainability. Diluting it into an indistinct financial logic means denying the role of agriculture as the backbone of the European project. The reactions of the farming community and the Member States are clear: this idea is unacceptable.

    In view of the above:

    • 1.Is the Commission prepared to formally declare the withdrawal of any proposal or idea about merging the CAP into a single fund, and will it commit to presenting a post-2027 multiannual financial framework that ensures there is a dedicated and strengthened agricultural budget?
    • 2.Will it immediately set up a transparent, binding and participatory process involving agricultural representatives and local authorities, based on preliminary public impact assessments, for any future proposals concerning the CAP?

    Submitted: 26.6.2025

    Last updated: 4 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Further price increases and the unacceptable state of maritime transport, paid for in every way by the people – E-001604/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The EU can meet its climate and zero pollution goals successfully only if all sectors of the economy, including shipping, make significant emission reductions.

    For instance, to mitigate potential cost increases, the maritime related Fit for 55 regulations require only gradual emission cuts over time, support is given to the industry through EU funding programmes, and Member States can provide certain temporary exemptions e.g. for connections to small islands.

    The liberalisation of maritime cabotage under Regulation (EEC) No 3577/92[1] allows EU operators to provide services freely, while enabling Member States to impose public service obligations to ensure connectivity, especially to islands.

    These may include requirements on fares, frequency, or vessel standards, and may be compensated under EU State aid rules, provided the aid is proportionate and transparent.

    The Commission does not regulate domestic fares, ticket categories, or the deployment of specific vessels. These matters fall entirely under national competence.

    It is for each Member State to decide whether to impose public service obligations or introduce social pricing schemes for groups such as students, pensioners, or persons with disabilities.

    Concerns about pricing, service levels or fleet conditions should therefore be addressed to the national authorities responsible.

    • [1] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/1992/3577/oj/eng.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Highlights – Public Hearing: Addressing Vacancy and the Repurposing of Empty Housing in the EU – Special committee on the Housing Crisis in the European Union

    Source: European Parliament

    Public Hearing: Addressing Vacancy and the Repurposing of Empty Housing in the EU © Adobe Stock

    On 14 July 2025, from 16:30 to 18:00, the European Parliament Special Committee on the Housing Crisis in the EU is organising a public hearing on Addressing Vacancy and the Repurposing of Empty Housing in the EU. The exchange will focus on investigating how vacant housing stock across Europe can be repurposed for affordable housing, including legal, financial, and administrative measures to encourage use rather than speculation.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Dispute between Türkiye and Germany on Traditional Specialities Guaranteed status for döner – E-002591/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002591/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Kosma Złotowski (ECR)

    In April 2024, Türkiye submitted an application to the Commission for döner to be granted Traditional Specialities Guaranteed status (TSG). If this status were to be granted, kebab would have to be prepared and served following a strictly defined Turkish recipe, among other things requiring specific marinated meats to be used.

    Germany, where Turkish migrants popularised döner kebab in the 1970s, opposed the request, arguing that the dish has become integral to German culinary culture and can be found in a range of forms that reflect the country’s own diversity. The German method of preparing döner kebab has gained widespread popularity across Europe, especially in Poland where research shows that the kebab industry is worth over PLN 2.5 billion, with Poles consuming up to 5 million kebabs every day. Kebabs are now served in a variety of ways, including vegetarian versions.

    The Commission gave the two parties six months to reach a compromise. However, no such understanding was reached and the Commission committed to making a decision itself as to whether or not döner kebab would be granted TSG status.

    • 1.Why has the Commission still not made a final decision in this case and when will it do so?
    • 2.If TSG status is granted to döner kebabs, will it really become obligatory to follow one specific recipe across the EU and, if so, will regional variations of the dish be recognised as their own specialities?
    • 3.What action will the Commission take if Member States object to the decision to grant TSG status?

    Submitted: 26.6.2025

    Last updated: 4 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Hearings – Public Hearing: Addressing Vacancy and the Repurposing of Empty Housing in the EU – 14-07-2025 – Special committee on the Housing Crisis in the European Union

    Source: European Parliament

    Public Hearing: Addressing Vacancy and the Repurposing of Empty Housing in the EU © Adobe Stock

    On 14 July 2025, from 16:30 to 18:00, the European Parliament Special Committee on the Housing Crisis in the EU is organising a public hearing on Addressing Vacancy and the Repurposing of Empty Housing in the EU. The exchange will focus on investigating how vacant housing stock across Europe can be repurposed for affordable housing, including legal, financial, and administrative measures to encourage use rather than speculation.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Turkish airlines must respect the ICAO or otherwise be banned from operating in EU airspace – E-000823/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission is aware of flights by Turkish air carriers between Ercan Airport and Türkiye even though the airport has not been designated by the Republic of Cyprus, in accordance with Article 68 of the Chicago Convention, for use for international air services.

    Moreover, in the absence of an air services agreement in force between the Republic of Cyprus and Türkiye, such operations are not permitted, in accordance with Article 6 of the same Convention.

    The Commission considers that in line with the 2024 Türkiye Report[1] which sets out Türkiye’s obligations on the normalisation of relations with Cyprus, Türkiye is expected to actively support negotiations on a fair, comprehensive and viable settlement of the Cyprus issue, in accordance with relevant United Nations Security Council Resolutions and the EU’s founding principles and acquis.

    As for potential sanctions by the Commission, it should be noted that there is no agreement on air services between the EU and Türkiye. Such an agreement might allow the Commission to directly address the situation and adopt measures on such air carriers.

    Air services between the Member States and Türkiye (including those operated by Turkish air carriers) are currently governed by the respective air services agreements in force between Member States and Türkiye.

    Any decision on adopting restrictive measures (sanctions) under the EU’s Common Foreign and Security Policy is for the Council to make under Article 31 Treaty on European Union[2].

    • [1] https://enlargement.ec.europa.eu/document/download/8010c4db-6ef8-4c85-aa06-814408921c89_en?filename=T%C3%BCrkiye%20Report%202024.pdf.
    • [2] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/treaty/teu_2016/art_31/oj/eng.
    Last updated: 4 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Africa: The Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) pre-election information mission in Côte d’Ivoire meets with political parties and groups, religious and traditional leaders

    Source: APO – Report:

    .

    “We are listening to everyone, and then we will formulate recommendations that will be forwarded to the President of the ECOWAS Commission, H.E. Omar Alieu Touray. He will take the political decisions, in consultation with the current Chair of the Authority of Heads of State and Government of ECOWAS, H.E. Julius Madaa Bio, President of the Republic of Sierra Leone,” explained Theodore Holo, Head of the ECOWAS pre-election mission, to the various stakeholders he met on the 2nd and 3rd of July, 2025.

    On Wednesday 2nd of July 2025, the ECOWAS mission met with leaders of the Democratic Party of Côte d’Ivoire (PDCI-RDA), the Coalition of the Congress for Democracy and Peace (CAP-CI), the Constitutional Council, the African People’s Party – Côte d’Ivoire (PPA-CI) and finally, the Rally of Houphouëtists for Democracy and Peace (RHDP party.

    On Thursday 3rd of July 2025, the ECOWAS mission paid a courtesy visit to the President of the Republic of Côte d’Ivoire, H.E. Alassane OUATTARA. The mission then met with religious and traditional authorities as well as journalists from local private media at the headquarters of the ECOWAS Representation in Côte d’Ivoire. In the afternoon, Prof. Holo visited the Ministry of Defence, where he was received in audience by Minister Téné Birahima Ouattara.

    During his meetings with the stakeholders, Prof. HOLO explained the objectives of the consultation, which are to gather information and assess the political and institutional environment, as well as the aid needs to ensure that the elections are conducted in a free, transparent, and peaceful manner. Nevertheless, Prof. Holo encouraged and advocated for dialogue between political actors with a view to finding a lasting solution to ongoing challenges or those that could hinder the electoral process.

    – on behalf of Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS).

    MIL OSI Africa

  • MIL-OSI Africa: President of Venezuela Meets Minister of State at Ministry of Foreign Affairs

    Source: Government of Qatar

    Caracas, July 04

    HE President of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela Nicolas Maduro met today in Caracas with HE Minister of State at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs Dr. Mohammed bin Abdulaziz bin Saleh Al Khulaifi.

    The meeting discussed aspects of cooperation between the two countries and ways to enhance and promote them, in addition to the latest regional and international developments, particularly in Latin America, the Gaza Strip and the occupied Palestinian territories. Discussions also addressed the joint Qatari mediation efforts aimed at achieving a ceasefire in the Gaza Strip, as well as a range of issues of mutual interest.

    HE the Minister of State at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs emphasized the State of Qatar’s commitment to enhancing its partnership with the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela in all areas. He also underscored the importance of intensifying joint efforts to promote stability throughout the Latin American region.

    MIL OSI Africa

  • MIL-OSI USA: Hoeven Statement on House Passage of One Big Beautiful Bill

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for North Dakota John Hoeven

    07.04.25

    Legislation Heads to President Trump to be Signed into Law

    BISMARCK, N.D. – Senator John Hoeven issued the following statement after the House of Representatives passed the One Big Beautiful Bill, legislation that delivers on promises to:

    • Provide permanent tax relief for American families and small businesses.
    • Secure the border. 
    • Rebuild our military.
    • Support farmers and ranchers by passing the heart and soul of the farm bill.
    • Unleash American energy dominance.

    At the same time, the legislation finds savings of $1.6 trillion through common sense reforms and reducing waste, fraud and abuse, ultimately reducing the deficit by $507 billion.

    “The One Big Beautiful Bill will make our nation more prosperous and more secure. We worked to pass this legislation to provide permanent tax relief for American families that will enable them to keep more of their hard-earned paychecks. We invest in priorities like border security, national defense, unleashing American energy dominance and passing the heart and soul of the farm bill for our farmers and ranchers. At the same time, we find $1.6 trillion in savings to help with our debt and deficit. This bill delivers on the priorities that President Trump promised to get our nation back on track.”

    Tax Relief for Families and Small Businesses

    The legislation permanently extends current individual tax rates and bracket changes of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, providing $4 trillion in tax relief and will increase take-home pay by up to $10,900 in the first four years for the typical family, resulting from economic growth and tax relief.

    The bill provides new and expanded tax deductions and credits for individuals, families and seniors, including:

    • No taxes on tips or overtime for millions of American workers.
    • Increasing and making permanent the enhanced child tax credit at $2,200, with $1,700 of that amount being refundable, adjusted for inflation.
    • Permanent relief from the death tax by setting the exemption to $15 million or $30 million for those married filing jointly, adjusted for inflation.
    • Savings accounts for newborns to help build financial security.
    • A new $6,000 tax deduction for millions of low- and middle-income seniors. Combined with other deductions, this will result in the average beneficiary paying zero taxes on Social Security

    The legislation helps small businesses, including agricultural producers and manufacturers invest in their operations by:

    • Permanently extending the Section 199A pass-through deduction for small businesses, farmers and ranchers.
      • Permanently extending the Section 199A(g) deduction used by agricultural cooperatives.
    • Increasing the Section 179 expensing amount to $2.5 million and increasing the phaseout for qualified property at $4 million.
    • Establishing a 100 percent accelerated depreciation for new industrial and manufacturing facilities that begin construction between 2025-2028.
    • Making permanent the 30 percent interest expense allowance.
    • Permanently extending the 100 percent domestic research and development deduction.
    • Making permanent 100 percent bonus depreciation.

    Support for Farmers and Ranchers

    To support the nation’s farmers and ranchers, Hoeven worked to pass the heart and soul of the farm bill in the One Big Beautiful Bill.  The legislation improves the farm-safety net to meet today’s markets and input costs, essentially providing a seven year farm bill. Specifically, the bill:

    • Increases reference prices for Agriculture Risk Coverage (ARC) and Price Loss Coverage (PLC) by 10% to 20% (specific increase varies by commodity).
      • Built-in future reference price increases with an inflation adjuster and an improved price escalator to prevent reference prices from becoming outdated when market and input costs change.
      • New safety net begins right away – producers can receive the higher of the ARC or PLC payment for this crop year, 2025, with the new updated reference prices. North Dakota farmers will see tens of millions of dollars in relief in 2025 alone thanks to these updates.
    • Includes key provisions of Hoeven’s FARMER Act to strengthen and expand access to affordable crop insurance:
      • Increases premium support for individual-based coverage across nearly all levels – starting at 55% — by an additional 3-5%.
      • Enhances the Supplemental Coverage Option by raising the coverage level from 86% to 90%, and boosts premium support from 65% to 80%.
    • Extends the sugar program through 2031, while increasing the sugar loan rate to better align with current market conditions.
    • Improves livestock disaster programs
      • Sets Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) payments at 100% of market value for losses from federally protected predators and 75% for weather and disease losses.
      • Improves the Livestock Forage Program (LFP) to provide one monthly payment to eligible producers with grazing land in counties rated D2 (severe drought) for at least four consecutive weeks and two payments if D2 persists during any seven of eight consecutive weeks within the normal grazing period.

    Unleashing U.S. Energy Dominance

    The One Big Beautiful Bill will help restore American energy dominance by rolling back burdensome Green New Deal policies and empowering domestic energy production, including:

    • Increasing the value of the 45Q tax credit for captured carbon used in enhanced oil recovery (EOR) and utilization to match that of sequestration.
    • Requiring the Interior Department to hold regular oil and gas lease sales across federal lands and waters.
    • Requiring the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) to act timely on coal lease applications.
    • Reducing the royalty rate for oil, gas and coal produced on federal land to their levels prior to the Biden administration’s tax-and-spend legislation.
    • Stopping the Biden-era natural gas tax.
    • Investing in the Strategic Petroleum Reserve.
    • Providing regulatory relief for energy producers and repeals Biden-era Green New Deal policies and programs.

    Bolstering the Military

    • $25 billion to support the Golden Dome initiative, with investments in hypersonic testing, ground-based radars, and space-based sensors that support North Dakota-based missions and capabilities.
    • $15 billion to enhance nuclear deterrence, including the nuclear missions based at Minot Air Force Base:
      •  $2.5 billion for the new Sentinel intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) program.
      • $500 million to sustain the existing Minuteman III ICBM.
      • $200 million for additional MH-1139 Grey Wolf helicopters.
    • Improves servicemembers’ quality of life through increased allowances and special pays, as well as improvements to housing, health care, childcare, and education.

    Securing the Border

    • Completes construction of the border wall, and upgrades barrier systems including access roads, cameras, lights, and sensors.
    • Improves border screening technology to help prevent drug trafficking and human smuggling.
    • Strong funding to hire and train more border security personnel.
    • Funds the Operation Stonegarden grant program to equip state and local law enforcements to cooperate with Border Patrol.
    • Invests in state and local capabilities to detect threats from unmanned aerial systems.

    Supporting Water Infrastructure

    • Provides $1 billion in funding for Bureau of Reclamation Water Conveyance Projects, including for eligible projects like the Eastern North Dakota Alternate Water Supply Project (ENDAWS).

    MIL OSI USA News