Category: DJF

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Travel ban on patriotic activists as a flagrant breach of the law – criminalisation of people advocating for remigration – E-002246/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002246/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Mary Khan (ESN)

    On 15 May 2025, German police at Munich airport blocked patriotic activists from flying to Italy to attend the Remigration Summit in Milan. Those concerned were not subject to criminal charges, and the justification given – citing a supposed threat to Germany’s image – is without foundation. This arbitrary restriction of the right to free movement enshrined in Article 21 TFEU has echoes of Stasi tactics and undermines trust in the basic principles of the rule of law.

    As with the labelling of the AfD as ‘extreme right’ – a label that infringes fundamental rights – here too, political beliefs are being used as grounds for state repression: young people campaigning peacefully for orderly migration are being treated like criminals – greeted with machine guns, detained for hours and terrorised. The mere suspicion of participation in a legal, anti-migration event in another EU Member State was sufficient to ride roughshod over fundamental rights. At a time when migrants are illegally crossing borders every day without consequence, a crackdown is being waged against anti-government patriots.

    • 1.What steps is the Commission taking to prevent the right to free movement enshrined in Article 21 TFEU from being curbed on political grounds?
    • 2.What does it make of the German authorities acting with no basis in criminal law to block EU citizens from travelling?
    • 3.Is it considering opening an investigation to determine whether the actions of the German authorities infringed fundamental rights?

    Submitted: 4.6.2025

    Last updated: 13 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – UK arrests for online speech and implications for EU digital regulation – E-002239/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002239/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Christine Anderson (ESN)

    Recent reports in The Times (4 April 2025)[1] reveal that UK police make over 30 arrests per day for ‘offensive’ online communications under vague laws criminalising messages that cause ‘annoyance’, ‘inconvenience’ or ‘anxiety’. Over 12 000 such arrests occurred in 2023 alone, with civil liberties groups warning of a chilling effect on free speech. Most cases do not result in conviction, yet individuals are subjected to police detention and reputational damage merely for expressing controversial views online.

    Given the EU’s own trajectory of regulating online content via the Digital Services Act and other instruments, and in view of the UK’s post-Brexit shift away from EU legal safeguards such as the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, I ask the Commission:

    • 1.Does the Commission consider Brexit a contributing factor in this decline in free expression in the UK?
    • 2.What safeguards exist in EU law to prevent similar over-policing of speech in the Member States, particularly when this results from employing vague legal terms and concepts?
    • 3.How will the Commission ensure that EU digital regulation does not enable comparable infringements on freedom of expression?

    Submitted: 4.6.2025

    • [1] https://www.thetimes.com/uk/crime/article/police-make-30-arrests-a-day-for-offensive-online-messages-zbv886tqf.
    Last updated: 13 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Authorisation of available treatments for feline infectious peritonitis (FIP) – E-002247/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002247/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Annalisa Corrado (S&D), Martin Hojsík (Renew), Sebastian Everding (The Left), Markéta Gregorová (Verts/ALE), Günther Sidl (S&D), Alessandro Zan (S&D), Flavio Tosi (PPE), Petras Auštrevičius (Renew), Sakis Arnaoutoglou (S&D), Sirpa Pietikäinen (PPE)

    Feline infectious peritonitis (FIP) is a highly lethal viral disease caused by a mutation of the feline coronavirus, affecting up to 2 % of cats, with over 95 % mortality in symptomatic cases. To date, no veterinary treatment has been officially authorised, despite the demonstrated efficacy of GS-441524, a derivative of Remdesivir.

    This therapy has been approved in the United Kingdom and was temporarily authorised by the EU in Cyprus during a 2023 outbreak. However, within the EU, it remains restricted to human use only. This leads to a dangerous black market, exposing animals to health risks, lack of quality control and unaffordable costs.

    European veterinary associations and animal welfare associations are calling for veterinarians to be granted legal access to this life-saving treatment.

    • 1.Is the Commission aware of this issue and does it intend to take any action, including steps to counter the black market that has developed?
    • 2.Given the deadlock in the Member States, does it consider that a centralised European authorisation procedure for veterinary use of this medicine could help overcome the current situation and ensure safe and legal treatment options for cats?

    Submitted: 4.6.2025

    Last updated: 13 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Lack of targeted support policies for people with disabilities and vulnerable groups in the EU – E-002221/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002221/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Afroditi Latinopoulou (PfE)

    The European Union proclaims social cohesion and care for the most vulnerable. However, reality exposes it. While in most Member States people with disabilities, low-income pensioners, single-parent families and other vulnerable social groups do not receive sufficient support to respond to price surges, the European Commission continues to allocate hundreds of millions of euros in subsidies, integration programmes and benefits for illegal immigrants.

    In view of the above:

    • 1.How does the Commission justify unequal treatment to the detriment of European citizens themselves, as people with disabilities and the poorest social classes remain without material support, while billions are allocated to housing, benefits and programmes for illegal immigrants?
    • 2.While the Commission imposes green and digital reforms, citizens with serious needs – people with disabilities, the elderly, low earners – do not have the financial means to respond. What protection mechanisms does the Commission intend to propose so that our vulnerable fellow citizens do not slide to the social margins of this ‘new’ Europe?
    • 3.The high cost of energy, basic goods and rents has disproportionately affected vulnerable groups. Why does the Commission not commit funds to these expenses, as it does for migration programmes, and does the Commission intend to promote direct, targeted financial aid to Member States, with citizens with disabilities and other vulnerable groups as the exclusive recipients?

    Submitted: 3.6.2025

    Last updated: 13 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Spread of paedo-criminal content – P-002322/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Priority question for written answer  P-002322/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Pascal Arimont (PPE)

    Items almost undoubtedly intended for paedophilia crimes are still being advertised on online platforms like X. The offending products are being marketed as ‘Baby Girl BDSM Bondage Sets’, which contain leather chokers for a neck measuring between 12.5 and 16 inches – the typical size for children aged 9 to 16 years.

    How is the Commission ensuring tougher enforcement so that all forms of sexual violence against children are subsequently punished and more effectively removed from huge online platforms?

    Submitted: 10.6.2025

    Last updated: 13 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Latest news – Meeting of Wednesday 18 June 2025, Strasbourg – Delegation for relations with the Mashreq countries

    Source: European Parliament

    The next DMAS meeting will take place in Strasbourg on 18 June from 17.00 to 18.00 in WEISS S2.2.
    The main item will be a debriefing of the 14th EU-Egypt Interparliamentary Meeting in Cairo, Egypt, 25-27 May 2025.

    Source : © European Union, 2025 – EP

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Greece on course for desertification – need for a special environmental protection scheme – E-002251/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002251/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Maria Zacharia (NI)

    Following successive waves of catastrophic fires, uncontrolled industrial renewable energy installation, the commercialisation of land and the lack of meaningful restoration, nature in Greece is being driven to collapse. Greek forests, flora and fauna are at risk of complete desertification. The region of Attica has lost 37 % of its forests over the last eight years, while Euboea, the Peloponnese, Rhodes and Western Greece are facing similar decline. As a Mediterranean country in the front line of the climate crisis, Greece sees its environmental value shrinking dramatically, without an institutional or national protection plan.

    Can the Commission therefore say:

    • 1.Does it intend to recognise Greece as a Member State of high environmental vulnerability under Regulation (EU) 2024/1991 on nature restoration?
    • 2.Will it invite the Greek Government to draw up a national map of areas of full environmental protection, with an explicit ban on commercial exploitation reducing the level of green coverage?
    • 3.What financial support is available for targeted reforestation with resistant, endemic species?

    Submitted: 4.6.2025

    Last updated: 13 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Cyprus’s Supreme Constitutional Court avoided the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) over transparency law – P-001545/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    In line with the ruling in Case C-283/81 Cilfit v Ministerio della Sanità[1], national supreme courts are not required to request a preliminary ruling if the EU legislation in question has already been the subject of interpretation by the Court of Justice of the European Union or if the issue of the correct application of EU law leaves no scope for any reasonable doubt as to the manner in which the question will be resolved.

    The Commission does not, in principle, initiate infringement proceedings under Article 258 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) if the infringement of obligations under Article 267(3) TFEU constitutes an isolated case.

    The Commission monitors significant developments concerning the rule of law in Member States, including on the anti-corruption framework in the context of the annual Rule of Law Report.

    The Commission follows closely developments in this area and will provide an up-to-date assessment in its 2025 Rule of Law Report, planned to be published in July 2025.

    • [1] ECLI:EU:C:1982:335.
    Last updated: 13 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Final draft agenda – Monday, 16 June 2025 – Strasbourg

    Source: European Parliament

    44 The human cost of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the urgent need to end Russian aggression: the situation of illegally detained civilians and prisoners of war, and the continued bombing of civilians
        – Motions for resolutions Wednesday, 2 July 2025, 13:00
        – Amendments to motions for resolutions; joint motions for resolutions Monday, 7 July 2025, 19:00
        – Amendments to joint motions for resolutions Monday, 7 July 2025, 20:00
    16 Strengthening rural areas in the EU through cohesion policy
    Denis Nesci (A10-0092/2025
        – Amendments by the rapporteur, 71 MEPs at least; Alternative motions for resolutions Wednesday, 11 June 2025, 13:00
    Texts put to the vote on Tuesday Friday, 13 June 2025, 12:00
    Texts put to the vote on Wednesday Monday, 16 June 2025, 19:00
    Texts put to the vote on Thursday Tuesday, 17 June 2025, 19:00
    Motions for resolutions concerning debates on cases of breaches of human rights, democracy and the rule of law (Rule 150) Wednesday, 18 June 2025, 19:00

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Final draft agenda – Tuesday, 17 June 2025 – Strasbourg

    Source: European Parliament

    34 Combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child sexual abuse material and replacing Council Framework Decision 2004/68/JHA (recast)
    Jeroen Lenaers (A10-0097/2025     – Amendments; rejection Wednesday, 11 June 2025, 13:00 50 Amending Regulation (EU) No 228/2013 as regards additional assistance and further flexibility to outermost regions affected by severe natural disasters and in the context of cyclone Chido devastating Mayotte     – Amendments; rejection Friday, 13 June 2025, 12:00     – Requests for “separate”, “split” and “roll-call” votes Monday, 16 June 2025, 19:00 36 Electoral rights of mobile Union citizens in European Parliament elections
    Sven Simon (A10-0090/2025     – Amendments Wednesday, 11 June 2025, 13:00 30 Amendments to Parliament’s Rules of Procedure concerning the declaration of input (Article 8 of Annex I to the Rules of Procedure)
    Sven Simon (A10-0086/2025     – Amendments Wednesday, 11 June 2025, 13:00 16 Strengthening rural areas in the EU through cohesion policy
    Denis Nesci (A10-0092/2025     – Amendments by the rapporteur, 71 MEPs at least; Alternative motions for resolutions Wednesday, 11 June 2025, 13:00 28 Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in Seville
    Charles Goerens (A10-0101/2025     – Amendments by the rapporteur, 71 MEPs at least; Alternative motions for resolutions Wednesday, 11 June 2025, 13:00 26 Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility
    Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan (A10-0098/2025     – Amendments Wednesday, 11 June 2025, 13:00 19 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report
    Ana Catarina Mendes (A10-0100/2025     – Amendments by the rapporteur, 71 MEPs at least, Alternative motions for resolutions Wednesday, 11 June 2025, 13:00 25 2023 and 2024 reports on Montenegro
    Marjan Šarec (A10-0093/2025     – Amendments Wednesday, 11 June 2025, 13:00 17 2023 and 2024 reports on Moldova
    Sven Mikser (A10-0096/2025     – Amendments Wednesday, 11 June 2025, 13:00 Separate votes – Split votes – Roll-call votes Texts put to the vote on Tuesday Friday, 13 June 2025, 12:00 Texts put to the vote on Wednesday Monday, 16 June 2025, 19:00 Texts put to the vote on Thursday Tuesday, 17 June 2025, 19:00 Motions for resolutions concerning debates on cases of breaches of human rights, democracy and the rule of law (Rule 150) Wednesday, 18 June 2025, 19:00

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Final draft agenda – Thursday, 19 June 2025 – Strasbourg

    Source: European Parliament

    48 The United Kingdom accession to the Convention of 2 July 2019 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters
    (O-000016/2025 – B10-0007/25)      – Motion for a resolution Wednesday, 11 June 2025, 13:00     – Amendments to motions for resolutions; joint motions for resolutions Friday, 13 June 2025, 12:00     – Amendments to joint motions for resolutions Friday, 13 June 2025, 13:00 65 Media freedom in Georgia, particularly the case of Mzia Amaglobeli     – Motions for resolutions (Rule 150) Monday, 16 June 2025, 20:00     – Amendments to motions for resolutions; joint motions for resolutions (Rule 150) Wednesday, 18 June 2025, 13:00     – Amendments to joint motions for resolutions (Rule 150) Wednesday, 18 June 2025, 14:00 66 Case of Ahmadreza Jalali in Iran     – Motions for resolutions (Rule 150) Monday, 16 June 2025, 20:00     – Amendments to motions for resolutions; joint motions for resolutions (Rule 150) Wednesday, 18 June 2025, 13:00     – Amendments to joint motions for resolutions (Rule 150) Wednesday, 18 June 2025, 14:00 68 Dissolution of political parties and the crackdown on the opposition in Mali     – Motions for resolutions (Rule 150) Monday, 16 June 2025, 20:00     – Amendments to motions for resolutions; joint motions for resolutions (Rule 150) Wednesday, 18 June 2025, 13:00     – Amendments to joint motions for resolutions (Rule 150) Wednesday, 18 June 2025, 14:00 53 Welfare of dogs and cats and their traceability
    Veronika Vrecionová (A10-0104/2025     – Amendments; rejection Monday, 16 June 2025, 19:00     – Requests for “separate”, “split” and “roll-call” votes Tuesday, 17 June 2025, 16:00 41 Electricity grids: the backbone of the EU energy system
    Anna Stürgkh (A10-0091/2025     – Amendments by the rapporteur, 71 MEPs at least, Alternative motions for resolutions Wednesday, 11 June 2025, 13:00 38 Clean Industrial Deal
    (O-000020/2025 – B10-0006/25)      – Motions for resolutions Wednesday, 11 June 2025, 13:00     – Amendments to motions for resolutions; joint motions for resolutions Friday, 13 June 2025, 12:00     – Amendments to joint motions for resolutions Friday, 13 June 2025, 13:00 Separate votes – Split votes – Roll-call votes Texts put to the vote on Tuesday Friday, 13 June 2025, 12:00 Texts put to the vote on Wednesday Monday, 16 June 2025, 19:00 Texts put to the vote on Thursday Tuesday, 17 June 2025, 19:00 Motions for resolutions concerning debates on cases of breaches of human rights, democracy and the rule of law (Rule 150) Wednesday, 18 June 2025, 19:00

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Final draft agenda – Wednesday, 18 June 2025 – Strasbourg

    Source: European Parliament

    51 Macro-financial assistance to Egypt
    Céline Imart (A10-0037/2025     – Amendments; rejection Monday, 16 June 2025, 20:00     – Requests for “separate”, “split” and “roll-call” votes Tuesday, 17 June 2025, 16:00 39 Adoption by the Union of the Agreement on the interpretation and application of the Energy Charter Treaty
    Anna Cavazzini, Borys Budka (A10-0009/2025     – Amendments; rejection Friday, 13 June 2025, 12:00 26 Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility
    Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan (A10-0098/2025     – Amendments Wednesday, 11 June 2025, 13:00 19 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report
    Ana Catarina Mendes (A10-0100/2025     – Amendments by the rapporteur, 71 MEPs at least, Alternative motions for resolutions Wednesday, 11 June 2025, 13:00 25 2023 and 2024 reports on Montenegro
    Marjan Šarec (A10-0093/2025     – Amendments Wednesday, 11 June 2025, 13:00 17 2023 and 2024 reports on Moldova
    Sven Mikser (A10-0096/2025     – Amendments Wednesday, 11 June 2025, 13:00 38 Clean Industrial Deal
    (O-000020/2025 – B10-0006/25)      – Motions for resolutions Wednesday, 11 June 2025, 13:00     – Amendments to motions for resolutions; joint motions for resolutions Friday, 13 June 2025, 12:00     – Amendments to joint motions for resolutions Friday, 13 June 2025, 13:00 41 Electricity grids: the backbone of the EU energy system
    Anna Stürgkh (A10-0091/2025     – Amendments by the rapporteur, 71 MEPs at least, Alternative motions for resolutions Wednesday, 11 June 2025, 13:00 65 Media freedom in Georgia, particularly the case of Mzia Amaglobeli     – Motions for resolutions (Rule 150) Monday, 16 June 2025, 20:00     – Amendments to motions for resolutions; joint motions for resolutions (Rule 150) Wednesday, 18 June 2025, 13:00     – Amendments to joint motions for resolutions (Rule 150) Wednesday, 18 June 2025, 14:00 66 Case of Ahmadreza Jalali in Iran     – Motions for resolutions (Rule 150) Monday, 16 June 2025, 20:00     – Amendments to motions for resolutions; joint motions for resolutions (Rule 150) Wednesday, 18 June 2025, 13:00     – Amendments to joint motions for resolutions (Rule 150) Wednesday, 18 June 2025, 14:00 68 Dissolution of political parties and the crackdown on the opposition in Mali     – Motions for resolutions (Rule 150) Monday, 16 June 2025, 20:00     – Amendments to motions for resolutions; joint motions for resolutions (Rule 150) Wednesday, 18 June 2025, 13:00     – Amendments to joint motions for resolutions (Rule 150) Wednesday, 18 June 2025, 14:00 Separate votes – Split votes – Roll-call votes Texts put to the vote on Tuesday Friday, 13 June 2025, 12:00 Texts put to the vote on Wednesday Monday, 16 June 2025, 19:00 Texts put to the vote on Thursday Tuesday, 17 June 2025, 19:00 Motions for resolutions concerning debates on cases of breaches of human rights, democracy and the rule of law (Rule 150) Wednesday, 18 June 2025, 19:00

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Violations of Article 48 of the Istanbul Convention and European legislation on the protection of victims due to criminal mediation – E-001429/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    Article 48 of the Istanbul Convention requires Parties to prohibit mandatory alternative dispute resolution processes. In the referred GREVIO Baseline evaluation Report, GREVIO notes that criminal mediation is not mandatory in criminal justice procedures in Greece[1].

    Pursuant to Article 12 of the Victims’ Rights Directive[2] (VRD), in Member States where restorative justice services are provided, safeguards shall be in place to ensure the victim is not further victimised and the participation of the victim shall be voluntary.

    Other factors such as power imbalances should also be taken into consideration in conducting a restorative justice process. The Commission has analysed whether Member States have completely transposed into national legislation all normative provisions of the VRD.

    In its role as guardian of the Treaties, the Commission continues to monitor the correct enforcement of these provisions in all Member States, including in Greece, and will take appropriate action, if necessary.

    In the referred GREVIO Baseline evaluation Report, GREVIO also recommend that all relevant actors in the criminal justice sector receive training on the gendered dynamics of domestic violence.

    In this regard, Article 36 of the directive on combating violence against women and domestic violence Directive[3] requires Member States to provide general and specialist training and information for professionals meeting victims of violence against women and domestic violence.

    Member States, including Greece, will need to implement this directive by June 2027. During this period, the Commission will hold implementation workshops to steer the timely and complete transposition of the directive.

    • [1] GREVIO Baseline Evaluation Report,, p. 57, para 242-248.
    • [2] Directive 2012/29/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 establishing minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime, and replacing Council Framework Decision 2001/220/JHA. OJ L 315, 14.11.2012, p. 57.
    • [3] Directive (EU) 2024/1385 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 May 2024 on combating violence against women and domestic violence, OJ of 24.5.202, L p. 1.
    Last updated: 13 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Reference price in the cotton aid scheme – E-001631/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    In claim year 2023, Greek cotton producers received EUR 734 per hectare (plus top up when the producers are members of an inter-branch organisation, where applicable) based upon the reference values fixed in the Strategic Plan Regulation[1].

    The Commission is closely monitoring the current situation, but a legal change to increase the reference amount and the earmarked budget is not planned.

    Member States can also use other instruments including state aid, to design their sectoral support strategy. The available tools range from Basic Income Support for Sustainability (e.g. regionally differentiated for agronomic reasons to further improve all farmers’ viability in the region concerned) to improve the farmers’ viability, to investments to improve their competitiveness and resilience to eco-schemes to support sustainability of cotton production. Some of these investments could also be supported by Greece’s financial instrument.

    Additional relevant tools can be risk management (e.g. insurances), sectoral interventions that also can support producer groups or agri-environment-climate measures.

    • [1] Regulation (EU) 2021/2115 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 435, 6.12.2021, p. 1.).
    Last updated: 13 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – National sovereignty undermined due to abuse of the freedom to transfer capital set out in Article 63 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU – E-001529/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    Member States have the right to regulate real estate markets. In doing so, however, they must respect the basic principles of the EU Treaties, first and foremost the fundamental freedoms.

    The right to acquire, use or dispose of real estate falls under the free movement of capital principle set out in Articles 63 et seq. of the TFEU, or, depending on the purpose, under freedom of establishment pursuant to Article 49 TFEU.

    As a rule, these freedoms prohibit any restrictions on the acquisition of real estate as well as direct or indirect discrimination on grounds of nationality, unless they are justified by legitimate reasons of public interest as recognised in the Treaties or in the jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU).

    Where a measure pursues such a legitimate objective, restrictions to property transactions can be justified only insofar as they are suitable for securing, in a consistent and systematic manner, the attainment of the objective which they pursue and do not go beyond what is necessary in order to attain that objective[1].

    The free movement of capital also extends to investments from third countries. However, special considerations apply to justifications for restrictions on the movement of capital to and from third countries.

    The CJEU stressed that the relations with third countries can be said to ‘take place in a different legal context’ from that which occurs within the EU, when EU legislation is not applicable to third countries.

    Consequently, under the Treaty additional justifications may be acceptable in the case of Member States’ restrictions as regards third countries.[2] To be noted that the freedom of establishment extends to nationals of Member States as well as legal entities established in the EU.

    • [1] Case C-670/21, BA (Inheritance — Public housing policy in the European Union), EU:C:2023:763, p. 67 and the case-law cited.
    • [2] CJEU, cases C-101/05, Skatteverket, p. 36; C-446/04, Test Claimants in the FII Group Litigation, p. 171.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – EU investments and actions for the active prevention of gender-based violence and femicide, including through smart video surveillance systems – E-001380/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    Combating and preventing violence against women and domestic violence is a key priority for the EU. The Roadmap for Women’s Rights[1], adopted in March 2025, is articulated around eight key women’s rights principles, with freedom from gender-based violence as the first principle.

    The first objective under this principle consists of preventing and combating all forms of violence against women and girls, including domestic violence, femicide, and technology-facilitated gender-based violence.

    The Roadmap does not include, in and of itself, specific actions and resources but rather sets a long-term vision with key principles and objectives on women’s rights which will inform forthcoming concrete policy measures, in particular under the Gender Equality Strategy post-2025. An open public consultation on concrete actions for this strategy was launched in May 2025.

    In parallel, several actions are already ongoing. For instance, in May 2024 the directive on combating violence against women and domestic violence[2] was adopted.

    The EU has now its first, strong and comprehensive law to fight gender-based violence, which requires Member States to take strong prevention measures. The directive must be implemented by June 2027.

    The Artificial Intelligence (AI) Continent Action Plan[3] includes the InvestAI initiative that aims at mobilising EUR 200 billion for investment in AI.

    This facility will not focus on investments in specific AI systems, but rather aims at mobilising investments for infrastructure needed for AI development, notably the development of AI Gigafactories in the EU.

    • [1] The EU Roadmap for Women’s Rights: a renewed push for gender equality — European Commission.
    • [2] Directive (EU) 2024/1385 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 May 2024 on combating violence against women and domestic violence, OJ L, 2024/1385, 24.5.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2024/1385/o.
    • [3] AI continent — European Commission.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Price of energy in Europe – E-000915/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    On 26 February 2025, the Commission presented the action plan for Affordable Energy[1] alongside the Clean Industrial Deal underlining that affordable energy is a fundamental pillar of Europe’s strategy for sustainable prosperity and industrial competitiveness.

    The action plan for Affordable Energy sets out eight concrete measures across four pillars to accelerate the clean transition and complete the Energy Union.

    It includes actions to reduce electricity bills, such as making network charges more efficient and lowering taxation for electricity, while promoting long-term contracts like power purchase agreements (PPAs) and contracts for difference (CfDs) to stabilise prices and support investments in clean energy.

    Faster permitting for grids, renewables and storage will also help reduce costs across the system. The concerted measures of the action plan are expected to bring forward overall savings of EUR 130 billion per year by 2030.

    With the full engagement of Member States and all relevant stakeholders, the implementation of this Action Plan, together with the Clean Industrial Deal, will enable Europe to remain globally competitive while advancing decarbonisation and ensuring that the benefits of cheaper, cleaner energy reach households and industry alike.

    • [1] https://energy.ec.europa.eu/strategy/affordable-energy_en.
    Last updated: 13 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Regulated tariffs for the sale of electricity: a force for stability and social justice in Europe – E-001358/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission acknowledges the importance of stable, predictable and affordable electricity prices for consumers. To this purpose, t he Commission adopted the action plan for Affordable Energy on 26 February 2025[1].

    This plan presents measures to reduce energy costs for industry and households and help build a genuine Energy Union that delivers competitiveness, security, decarbonisation, and a just transition.

    As part of this Plan, the Commission will propose a Citizens’ Energy Package to increase citizens’ participation in the energy transition and strengthen the social dimension of the Energy Union.

    The implementation of specific tariff schemes such as regulated tariffs for the sale of electricity (TRVEs) are framed by Article 5 of the Electricity Directive that provides that suppliers are free to determine the price at which they supply electricity to customers .

    It also provides that Member States may derogate from this provision and implement public i nterventions on price setting under specific conditions[2].

    The Commission is required by 31 December 2025 to review and submit a report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the implementation of Article 5 together with or followed by a legislative proposal, if appropriate.

    This report will be based on the reports submitted by each Member State and on a study on the post-crisis retail market which the Commission is currently steering. It is not possible for the time being to prejudge any of the conclusions of the study or the report.

    • [1] https://energy.ec.europa.eu/publications/action-plan-affordable-energy-unlocking-true-value-our-energy-union-secure-affordable-efficient-and_en.
    • [2] Defined in Article 5 of the Electricity Directive (EU) 2019/944 — https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2019/944/oj/eng.
    Last updated: 13 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Greece’s failure to apply the directives on a common system for VAT rates as low as zero on essential items such as food, medicines, pharmaceuticals, clothing and housing – P-001904/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission attaches great importance to the timely and correct transposition of EU law.

    Greece has not transposed the provisions of: (i)  Council Directive (EU) 2020/285 of 18 February 2020[1] which exempts small enterprises from value-added tax (VAT), alleviates their VAT compliance obligations and makes it easier to trade within the internal market, and (ii) Council Directive (EU) 2022/542 of 5 April 2022[2] which allows for a wider use of reduced rates, including the use of zero rates for essential products such as food, pharmaceuticals and products intended for medical use . Both directives had to be transposed into national law by 31 December 2024.

    Therefore, the Commission opened infringement procedures[3] against Greece by sending letters of formal notice on 31 January 2025. Greece had to respond, complete its transposition and notify the measures to the Commission by 31 March 2025.

    Greece did not reply to the letters of formal notice or notify transposition measures for the directives. The Commission is currently envisaging the next step in the infringement procedures.

    • [1] Council Directive (EU) 2020/285 of 18 February 2020 amending Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax as regards the special scheme for small enterprises.
    • [2] Council Directive (EU) 2022/542 of 5 April 2022 amending Directives 2006/112/EC and 2020/285 as regards rates of value added tax.
    • [3] https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/el/inf_25_273.
    Last updated: 13 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – ‘Exit tax’ in connection with relocating to another Member State – P-001754/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission understands that the Belgian Government is currently reflecting on the introduction of an exit tax in the context of a broader discussion on capital gains taxation. Based on publicly available information, this discussion appears to be still ongoing, and no legal act has been proposed yet by the Belgian Government or adopted by the Chamber of Representatives.

    Since there is no legal act or provisions in place, the Commission is not able to take a view on the compatibility of such an envisaged exit tax with EU law.

    In principle, restrictions to the Single Market are generally prohibited under the Treaties. Member States can adopt such exit taxes by exercising their national tax competence provided they fully comply with the free movement of capital (Article 63 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union), as clarified by the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union.

    Last updated: 13 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Commission communication on spyware – E-000435/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission has followed closely the work of the Committee to investigate the use of Pegasus surveillance spyware (PEGA) conducted during the previous parliamentary term.

    Based on the report and the recommendations, as well as its own fact-gathering exercise, the Commission will decide on the most appropriate way forward.

    The Commission’s position is very clear: any attempts to illegally access data of citizens, including journalists and political opponents, is unacceptable, if confirmed.

    Even where the use of spyware is linked to national security, and in instances where it falls outside the scope of EU law, national checks and balances need to ensure that safeguards are in place.

    The Commission has followed up on developments concerning the alleged illegal use of intrusive surveillance software in its annual Rule of Law Reports, in particular as regards the functioning of national checks and balances in response to such allegations.

    The EU data protection and privacy acquis offers comprehensive protection to the confidentiality of communications and users’ personal data and terminal equipment. EU data protection law is applicable to the processing of personal data by private entities, even where such processing is required for national security purposes.

    Under the provisions of the ePrivacy Directive[1], the interception or surveillance of communications by public or private bodies is prohibited without the consent of the user.

    While restrictions to these provisions are permitted for important public objectives, they are subject to strict conditions and safeguards.

    The Law Enforcement Directive[2] is also applicable when competent authorities process personal data for law enforcement purposes. Processing of personal data under these instruments is subject to control by supervisory authorities, which have effective powers to examine any allegations of misuse, as well as subject to judicial review.

    • [1] Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2002 concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector (Directive on privacy and electronic communications), OJ L 201, 31.7.2002, p. 37.
    • [2] Directive (EU) 2016/680 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by competent authorities for the purposes of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties, and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Council Framework Decision 2008/977/JHA, OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, p. 89-131.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Trade agreements and respect of social and environmental standards – E-001653/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission remains committed to its trade and sustainable development (TSD) policy as put forward in the 2022 Communication ‘The power of trade partnerships: together for green and just economic growth’[1].

    It is based on an engagement-based approach grounded in international frameworks and standards with strong implementation and enforcement. This includes the use of remedies for breaches of core TSD provisions. The final outcome of each agreement is country specific.

    The agreements with Kenya and Chile have strong TSD commitments, including provisions on labour matters, gender equality, environment and the fight against climate change.

    These commitments are binding and enforceable through specific dispute resolution mechanisms. In addition, a review clause in the agreements also allows for the possibility to further enhance the mechanism by agreeing on the application of the temporary suspension of trade preferences (i.e. remedies). The Commission is committed to engage with Kenya and Chile as part of this review mechanism.

    Trade agreements can serve the Sustainable Development Goals in various ways, with the enforcement mechanism of TSD provisions being one of the important aspects.

    The Commission regularly assesses the sustainable development impact of its trade agreements, through ex-ante impact assessments[2] as well as through ex-post evaluations[3].

    The Commission is committed to follow up on their conclusions as appropriate to maximise the sustainable development potential of the agreements.

    • [1]  COM (2022) 409; https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52022DC0409.
    • [2] https://policy.trade.ec.europa.eu/analysis-and-assessment/sustainability-impact-assessments_en.
    • [3] https://policy.trade.ec.europa.eu/analysis-and-assessment/ex-post-evaluations_en.
    Last updated: 13 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Commission’s stance on improving road safety by introducing photoluminescent lane markings throughout the EU – E-001415/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission is committed to the achievement of ambitious road safety goals, with the aim of having no deaths or serious injuries on EU roads by 2050.

    In this context, road infrastructure plays a crucial role by contributing to the prevention of accidents and by diminishing their consequences when they do occur.

    Road markings are an important feature of road infrastructure but are adapted by every Member State to its specific conditions, such as climate, traffic, costs, environmental policy etc. There are no common rules at EU level on the type of markings to be deployed on roads within the Union.

    Whilst the addition of a certain photoluminescent effect to road markings may be a useful feature to be considered by national administrations according to specific local situations, the Commission would underline that this cannot replace the need for road lighting which ensures the visibility of obstacles and of other road users in all weather and road conditions.

    Last updated: 13 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Construction work on the A69 motorway in France halted – E-001231/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission agrees that good connectivity and access to a well-functioning and sustainable transport system is key for regional development, for fostering economic, social, and territorial cohesion, and for the quality of life of EU citizens, including better rural-urban connectivity.

    Connectivity is one of the main objectives of the trans-European transport network (TEN-T) policy aimed at the creation of an EU wide, multimodal network of transport connections built in compliance with commonly agreed infrastructure standards.

    The road between Toulouse and Castres is not part of the TEN-T network. The planning and decisions on possible investments remain within the national competence.

    EU cohesion policy may play an important role in the matter questioned. However, the investment strategy of the Occitanie regional programme as proposed by the region and adopted by the Commission does not foresee funding for transport infrastructure under Policy Objective 3 ‘A more connected Europe’. It can still be noted that the region has allocated EUR 21 million to sustainable urban mobility.

    Last updated: 13 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Proposed ban on lead in ammunition – P-001769/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The European Chemicals Agency’s Committee for Socio-Economic Analysis concluded[1] in its assessment that the proposed restriction of lead in ammunition is proportionate, i.e. the expected benefits compensate the expected costs.

    The regulation on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)[2] does not provide for compensatory mechanisms, because restrictions are proposed after thoroughly assessing their estimated costs and benefits.

    In its proposal, the Commission paid close attention to preserving Member States’ defence preparedness as well as the Union’s strategic autonomy and security of supply.

    To this end, it (i) excludes all military and defence applications from the scope, and (ii) allows the continued use of lead bullets (the most common ammunition used for defence purposes) in civilian sports shooting ranges, without conditions.

    This will ensure that the demand for lead bullets remains at pre-restriction levels as the market for lead bullets is driven by bullets for sport shooting.

    Production lines for lead bullets will therefore remain economically viable and available should there be a need to scale up production for military uses.

    The restriction is not expected to bring new dependencies from third countries as most lead and steel used in ammunition already come from outside the EU. The proposed obligation to recover spent lead will rather help reduce the existing dependence.

    • [1] Committee for Risk Assessment (RAC), Committee for Socioeconomic Analysis (SEAC). Opinion on an Annex XV dossier proposing restrictions on Lead and its compounds (2 December 2022). https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/2c82ef18-ce5d-4b4f-8ff0-002932154acc.
    • [2] Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) (OJ L 396 30.12.2006, p. 1). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A02006R1907-20241218.
    Last updated: 13 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Methodology for registering heavy-duty vehicles running exclusively on CO2 neutral fuels – E-002265/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002265/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Andreas Glück (Renew)

    On 26 June 2024, Regulation (EU) 2024/1610 on strengthening the CO2 emission performance standards for new heavy-duty vehicles entered into force. Since CO2 reduction targets reaching 90 % in 2040 are measured only at the tailpipe, the regulation contradicts the important principle of technological neutrality. Indeed, it severely limits the possible use of CO2 neutral fuels, such as synthetic fuels and biofuels, to decarbonise heavy-duty transport in the EU.

    In recital 17 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1610, the Commission is tasked with assessing the role of a methodology for registering heavy-duty vehicles running exclusively on CO2 neutral fuels within one year of the date of entry into force of the regulation.

    • 1.When is the Commission planning to publish its assessment of the role of a methodology for registering heavy-duty vehicles running exclusively on CO2 neutral fuels?
    • 2.Is the Commission considering a targeted amendment of Regulation (EU) 2024/1610 in order to complement the legislation, with the possibility of registering heavy-duty vehicles running exclusively on CO2 neutral fuels?

    Submitted: 5.6.2025

    Last updated: 13 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Risks linked to hidden communication modules in solar inverters – E-002219/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002219/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Beatrice Timgren (ECR)

    A recent investigation has revealed that solar inverters manufactured by Chinese companies and deployed across Western markets may contain communication modules capable of transmitting data without the knowledge of the user[1]. These hidden modules, thus far only discovered in models exported to US markets, raise serious cybersecurity and sovereignty concerns. Such devices are reportedly installed in the products without being listed in the product documentation. This could potentially enable remote shutdowns and data exfiltration.

    Given the above:

    • 1.Is the Commission aware of these findings, and has it initiated an investigation into the security implications of Chinese-made inverters installed within the EU?
    • 2.What steps is the Commission taking to assess and mitigate risks to energy infrastructure from Chinese-controlled hardware and software?
    • 3.Will the Commission consider adjusting existing EU security standards or certification procedures to ensure that solar inverters and related components are subject to checks for hidden communication capabilities?

    Submitted: 3.6.2025

    • [1] Reuters, ‘Rogue communication devices found in Chinese solar power inverters’, 14 May 2025, https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/climate-energy/ghost-machine-rogue-communication-devices-found-chinese-inverters-2025-05-14.
    Last updated: 13 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Reserving strategic public procurement of European software for European companies – E-002666/2024(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    Since 12 July 2023, the Foreign Subsidies Regulation (FSR)[1] enables the Commission to address the distortive effect on competition of foreign subsidies.

    In particular, it introduced a notification obligation for bidders in public procurement procedures falling within the scope of application of the regulation with an estimated value equal or greater than EUR 250 million.

    In so far as the Commission’s own funding activities are concerned, the recast of the Financial Regulation[2] has introduced a horizontal legal basis in its Article 136 in order to identify sensitive award procedures, e.g. concerning strategic assets and interests such as satellite infrastructure.

    This allows for the introduction of participation restrictions, including for third country ownership and control of applicants and tenderers, where necessary, to protect security and public order of the EU and its Member States.

    Furthermore, with the Single Market Strategy[3] presented on 21 May 2025, the Commission has reaffirmed its commitment to review the EU public procurement framework in 2026 also with a view to introducing European preference criteria in EU public procurement for certain strategic technologies and sectors, while ensuring the competitiveness of tenders.

    The development of the platform as referred to by the Honourable Member has not been supported with EU funds.

    • [1] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32022R2560.
    • [2] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=OJ:L_202402509.
    • [3] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52025DC0500.
    Last updated: 13 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Digitisation of public administration and protection of European citizens’ data – E-000997/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Interoperable Europe Act[1] mandates EU and public bodies to conduct interoperability assessments (since 2025) and promotes cross-border collaboration via a share-and-reuse mechanism for solutions.

    This addresses interoperability gaps in states like Romania. To strengthen cybersecurity, the EU equipped itself with an extensive and solid legal framework, which includes the NIS2 Directive[2], the Cyber Resilience Act[3], the Cyber Solidarity Act[4] and the Cybersecurity Act[5] establishing the European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA), while the Digital Europe Programme (DEP) and Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF) fund IT infrastructure upgrades.

    For example, the Romanian recovery and resilience plan contains several reforms and investments to bolster cybersecurity of public and private entities for a budget of approximately EUR 138 million.

    The European Digital Identity (EUDI) Wallet and upcoming EU Business Wallet provide secure, harmonised digital identification for citizens, businesses, and public administrations to authenticate, receive notifications, and share verified credentials.

    For data protection, the Once-Only Technical System (OOTS) enables secure cross-border data sharing (e.g. birth certificates), identification through eIDAS/EUDI Wallets, with user consent and data previews.

    The Digital-Ready Policymaking (DRPM) framework ensures EU policies embed interoperability safeguards, including a mandatory ‘digital statement’ during policy design.

    Together, these initiatives streamline access to digital services (e.g. a Romanian citizen sharing data with a German institution) while ensuring compliance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)[6] and cybersecurity standards.

    • [1] Regulation (EU) 2024/903 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 March 2024 laying down measures for a high level of public sector interoperability across the Union; OJ L, 2024/903, 22.3.2024.
    • [2] Directive (EU) 2022/2555 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 on measures for a high common level of cybersecurity across the Union, amending Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 and Directive (EU) 2018/1972, and repealing Directive (EU) 2016/1148; OJ L 333, 27.12.2022, p. 80-152.
    • [3] Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2024 on horizontal cybersecurity requirements for products with digital elements and amending Regulations (EU) No 168/2013 and (EU) 2019/1020 and Directive (EU) 2020/1828; OJ L, 2024/2847, 20.11.2024.
    • [4] Regulation (EU) 2025/38 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 December 2024 laying down measures to strengthen solidarity and capacities in the Union to detect, prepare for and respond to cyber threats and incidents and amending Regulation (EU) 2021/694; OJ L, 2025/38, 15.1.2025.
    • [5] Regulation (EU) 2019/881 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on ENISA and on information and communications technology cybersecurity certification and repealing Regulation (EU) No 526/2013; OJ L 151, 7.6.2019, p. 15-69.
    • [6] Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC; OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, p. 1-88.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Strengthening workplace health and safety to prevent sudden cardiac arrest deaths – E-001716/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The EU ‘occupational safety and health (OSH) Framework Directive’[1] lays down the duty of the employer to ensure workers’ safety and health in all work-related aspects.

    It sets minimum requirements that apply to all workers and sectors of activity, covering risk assessment, preventive and protective measures, health surveillance and training, with special protection for sensitive risk groups.

    Along with the related OSH directives, the framework Directive provides comprehensive protection against all occupational risks. Therefore, it does not include explicit provisions for specific medical conditions, and there are no current plans for amendment. The development and implementation of specific measures fall under the prerogative of Member States.

    Nevertheless, several cardiovascular disease (CVD) risks are addressed by EU actions, for example, by providing an E-guide to managing stress and psychosocial risks[2].

    The Commission is also working on addressing other relevant OSH risks, for example via the review of the Workplace Directive[3] and the Display Screen Equipment Directive[4] to address new ways of working.

    The Commission facilitates the exchange of good practices and supports evidence-based policymaking to address CVD risks within the OSH context.

    In this regard, the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work provides analyses, guidelines, and tools to support the prevention and management of occupational CVDs[5] related risks.

    It is also planning an overview of regulation, policies, strategies and programmes for the prevention of work-related CVDs[6]. The Senior Labour Inspectors’ Committee prepares publications relevant to CVD prevention[7].

    • [1] Council Directive 89/391/EEC of 12 June 1989 on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health of workers at work. OJ L 183, 29.6.1989, p. 1. — https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=celex%3A31989L0391.
    • [2] European Agency for Safety and Health at Work, https://osha.europa.eu/en/tools-and-resources/e-guides/e-guide-managing-stress-and-psychosocial-risks.
    • [3] Council Directive 89/654/EEC of 30 November 1989 concerning the minimum safety and health requirements for the workplace (first individual directive within the meaning of Article 16 (1) of Directive 89/391/EEC). OJ L 393, 30.12.1989, p. 1-12. — https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/1989/654/oj/eng.
    • [4] Council Directive 90/270/EEC of 29 May 1990 on the minimum safety and health requirements for work with display screen equipment (fifth individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16 (1) of Directive 89/391/EEC) (90/270/EEC). OJ L 156 21.6.1990, p. 14. — https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/1990/270/oj/eng.
    • [5] https://osha.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/20230105%20Final%20SPD%202024-2026-FINAL.pdf.
    • [6] https://osha.europa.eu/en/about-eu-osha/procurement/osha2025lvp0002-exa-overview-regulation-policies-strategies-initiatives-and-programmes-prevention-work-related-cardiovascular-diseases-cvds-low-value-procedure.
    • [7] https://circabc.europa.eu/ui/group/fea534f4-2590-4490-bca6-504782b47c79/library/95caf22f-5b52-45e3-ad25-01aaa5c78e2c/details.

    MIL OSI Europe News