Category: DJF

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Underinvestment in endometriosis research – E-002260/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002260/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Tomasz Froelich (ESN)

    Endometriosis is a disorder that affects an estimated 200 million people worldwide and around 14 million women in Europe.

    Endometriosis is associated with a range of often debilitating symptoms, including severe pelvic pain, bowel symptoms and a risk of infertility[1].

    Endometriosis has a substantial economic impact, with direct healthcare costs, indirect costs related to lost productivity at work, and the financial burden of infertility treatments. Women with endometriosis need multiple medical consultations, diagnostic tests and treatments.

    The cost of endometriosis-associated sick leave for the EU is estimated at EUR 30 billion annually.

    Endometriosis is substantially under-represented in projects funded at EU level. Only 27 out of 145 983 projects funded in total (0.02 %) were related to endometriosis. Other non-malignant disorders received considerably more funds: 735 funded projects for depression, 410 for anxiety, etc. Gender-related autoimmune diseases received more funding than endometriosis. In addition, funding was mainly dedicated to the diagnosis of the disease, while few projects focused on treatment[2].

    • 1.Does the Commission agree that the funding dedicated to endometriosis at EU level is not aligned with the enormous burden attributable to the disease in the EU?
    • 2.What are the reasons for this substantial under-representation of endometriosis among projects funded at EU level?

    Submitted: 4.6.2025

    • [1] https://www.nature.com/articles/s44294-024-00048-6.
    • [2] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949838423000464.
    Last updated: 13 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – New evidence on cancer risks of glyphosate – P-002366/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Priority question for written answer  P-002366/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy (Renew)

    A recently published peer-reviewed study in Environmental Health has presented new evidence regarding the safety of glyphosate, concluding that two pesticides containing the substance glyphosate that are currently on the market pose a serious risk of developing various forms of cancer, especially in pregnancy and early life stages. In light of these findings, it is essential that the Commission acts swiftly to evaluate the potential risks and subsequently take action to protect public health.

    • 1.What is the Commission’s assessment of this study?
    • 2.Will the Commission take swift action in response to the study, such as a rapid risk assessment with the European Food Safety Authority?
    • 3.What is the Commission’s timeline for reviewing this new scientific evidence and determining whether regulatory action is warranted, and will it consider a precautionary pause in the meantime, given the potential public health implications?

    Submitted: 11.6.2025

    Last updated: 13 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Plastic cigarette filters – Inadequate implementation of Directive (EU) 2019/904 and lack of progress regarding prevention, alternatives and education – E-002262/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002262/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Manuela Ripa (PPE)

    Cigarette filters containing plastic are among the most common single-use plastic waste in the environment. They contain microplastics and toxic substances affecting soil, water and marine ecosystems. Although Directive (EU) 2019/904 encompasses plastic tobacco filters and provides for measures including extended producer responsibility and public awareness campaigns, its implementation across Member States remains uneven. The noticeable littering of public spaces by cigarette butts has hardly been reduced, while cities and municipalities continue to bear high disposal costs.

    • 1.Is the Commission aware that, in many Member States, the implementation of the SUP Directive in relation to cigarette filters has thus far failed to deliver meaningful improvements in collection, clean-up efforts, or consumer behaviour?
    • 2.Is the Commission considering introducing an EU-wide ban on the placing on the market of plastic cigarette filters and establishing binding requirements for the use of natural and biodegradable alternatives in order to permanently reduce pollution, microplastics and disposal costs?
    • 3.What is the Commission’s assessment of the impact of the awareness-raising measures provided for in Article 10 of the Directive with regard to reducing inappropriate disposal and to changing consumer behaviour?

    Submitted: 4.6.2025

    Last updated: 13 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Compliance with EU-equivalent environmental and labour standards of 13 new strategic projects under the Critical Raw Materials Act – E-002259/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002259/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Irena Joveva (Renew)

    With the recent announcement of 13 new strategic projects under the Critical Raw Materials Act[1], including a lithium extraction project in Serbia, the Commission has taken steps to secure access to key resources needed for the green transition. However, the proposed Jadar lithium project has raised serious concerns among local communities in the Jadar Valley, civil society organisations, and numerous environmental experts.

    Allegations of inadequate environmental impact assessments, limited public consultation, and risks to biodiversity have sparked widespread protests and highlighted the dangers of pursuing strategic partnerships without robust safeguards. More concerningly, the monitoring of these projects is reportedly ensured through national legislation and commitments made in letters of intent and memoranda of understanding (Art. 6 and Annex to the Critical Raw Materials Act).

    • 1.How does the Commission intend to ensure that strategic projects in non-EU countries, particularly in candidate countries such as Serbia, comply with EU-equivalent environmental and labour standards?
    • 2.In the light of the serious rule of law concerns highlighted in the latest accession progress report on Serbia, how does the Commission plan to ensure that monitoring is credible and effectively enforced in practice?

    Submitted: 4.6.2025

    • [1] Regulation (EU) 2024/1252 of 11 April 2024 establishing a framework for ensuring a secure and sustainable supply of critical raw materials (OJ L, 2024/1252, 3.5.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1252/oj).
    Last updated: 13 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Spain’s failure to comply with the European Parliament’s recommendations on stolen baby cases – E-002203/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002203/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Isabel Serra Sánchez (The Left)

    In 2017, the European Parliament’s Committee on Petitions adopted a raft of recommendations urging the Spanish authorities to effectively investigate cases of abductions of new-born babies during the Franco dictatorship and in the following years. These included setting up a special prosecutor’s office and a public DNA database, officially recognising these acts as crimes against humanity and providing victims with free legal aid and psychological support.

    Eight years later, in 2025, and after several failed attempts to pass specific legislation, many of these recommendations remain unfulfilled. The absence of adequate legislation and sufficient public resources has led to continued impunity and aggravated the institutional neglect of the victims.

    • 1.What measures does the European Commission intend to take in response to Spain’s continued failure to comply with these recommendations?
    • 2.Has the Commission set up any effective mechanisms to monitor possible violations of the rights of victims of enforced or involuntary disappearances by the Spanish authorities, as the Committee on Petitions requested in the aforementioned report?
    • 3.Does the Commission consider that this inaction constitutes a violation of Directive 2012/29/EU, the Victims’ Rights Directive?

    Submitted: 2.6.2025

    Last updated: 13 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Implementation of the EU Deforestation Regulation – platform – E-002230/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002230/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Alexander Bernhuber (PPE)

    A platform[1] has been set up for implementation of Regulation (EU) 2023/1115 on the making available on the Union market and the export from the Union of certain commodities and products associated with deforestation and forest degradation.

    • 1.What real costs have been incurred to date – both one-off and annual costs – for developing the platform and routinely taking charge of it, how have costs compared with initial estimates, and where were those estimates published?
    • 2.What outside firms or service providers have been or are involved in developing, maintaining and operating the platform and, in each case, in return for what one-off or ongoing remuneration?
    • 3.Where and with what provider is the data gathered and processed via the platform being stored (in terms of technical facilities and location) and who is currently responsible for operating and managing the platform (in-house or outsourcing)?

    Submitted: 4.6.2025

    • [1] https://eudr.webcloud.ec.europa.eu/tracesnt/login
    Last updated: 13 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Commission assesses nuclear investment needs by 2050 in view of decarbonisation and competitiveness goals

    Source: European Commission

    European Commission Press release Brussels, 13 Jun 2025 Delivering Member States’ plans regarding nuclear energy will require significant investments, of around €241 billion until 2050, both for lifetime extensions of existing reactors and the construction of new large-scale reactors.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Parliamentary oversight and public transparency on unidentified anomalous phenomena – E-002267/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002267/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Fabio De Masi (NI)

    At present, there is no mechanism in place for regular communication between the Commission and the European Parliament on the status of reports of unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAPs).

    Does the Commission intend to regularly inform Parliament about statistical and analytical findings related to UAP reports received through European safety systems, to ensure democratic oversight and transparency?

    Submitted: 5.6.2025

    Last updated: 13 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Transparent origin labelling of rice imported into the EU – E-002288/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002288/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Vicent Marzà Ibáñez (Verts/ALE)

    The current legislation (Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011) requires the origin of a food to be indicated only when not doing so is likely to mislead consumers. However, the packaging that many companies use for rice originating outside the EU not only features pictures, slogans and cultural elements that are associated with Valencia (such as falleras, barraca cottages or Albufera Natural Park), but also fails to disclose the true origin of the rice. In light of the above:

    • 1.What measures will the Commission take both to ensure that rice is clearly labelled with the true origin of the product and to avoid local iconography being used when the product does not originate from that area?
    • 2.Does it intend to extend the obligation to indicate primary origin (place of cultivation) to all rice packaged in the EU, as is already the case for other products (such as meat, honey and olive oil), to protect consumers and local producers?
    • 3.How will it tighten controls to identify and penalise packaging of rice that uses evocative pictures or names to suggest a false origin, thereby violating Articles 7 (fair information) and 26 (origin) of Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011?

    Submitted: 5.6.2025

    Last updated: 13 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Recurrent interruptions on the high-speed rail network serving Andalusia – E-002258/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002258/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Carmen Crespo Díaz (PPE), Borja Giménez Larraz (PPE)

    Over the past year, rail services in Spain have suffered multiple interruptions, such as alleged acts of sabotage and persistent technical failures, seriously affecting the Madrid-Andalusia line. The last incident left more than 16 000 passengers stranded due to a breakdown caused after the theft of cabling in Toledo. These events highlight serious failings in infrastructure management and safety, negatively affecting the connectivity of key regions such as Andalusia, despite the pledges by the Ministry of Transport. This runs counter to the European Commission’s objectives regarding territorial cohesion and fair mobility.

    In light of the above:

    • 1.What is the Commission’s assessment of the impact of these recurrent disruptions to the rail services in Spain – especially those affecting the rail links to Andalusia – with regard to the objectives of cohesion and sustainable mobility?
    • 2.Given the scale and frequency of these incidents, does the Commission intend to review national performance in the management of EU-supported transport infrastructure projects?
    • 3.Does the Commission intend to encourage the use of European funds for advanced monitoring and prevention technologies that guarantee the reliability of the European high-speed rail network?

    Submitted: 4.6.2025

    Last updated: 13 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – The unregulated over-concentration of renewable energy sources and non-compliance with Regulation (EU) 2024/1991 on nature restoration – E-002244/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002244/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Maria Zacharia (NI)

    Greece is implementing an energy model based on the uncontrolled insurgence of industrial renewable energy sources (RES), leading to oversupply of power, decreases in production expected to reach 30 % by 2030 (rather than the mere 4 % predicted in the national energy and climate plan), as well as serious risks to the stability of the electricity grid, as confirmed by the recent widespread blackout in Spain. At the same time, the mass installation of RES in Natura 2000 sites, forest ecosystems, agricultural land and close to settlements has led to deforestation, biodiversity loss and an overall degradation of the natural environment.

    In view of the above, and in accordance with Articles 4 and 11 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1991, can the Commission say:

    • 1.How does it assess the compatibility of Greece’s energy planning with the commitments of the aforementioned Nature Restoration Regulation?
    • 2.Will it demand that degraded areas be immediately added to the national restoration list and that existing installations be removed from protected areas?
    • 3.Will it recommend freezing new RES permits until this model is reassessed?

    Submitted: 4.6.2025

    Last updated: 13 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Safety of medicines authorised on the market by means of an emergency marketing authorisation – E-002229/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002229/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Ton Diepeveen (PfE)

    Regulation 2023/0131 pursues the general objective of ensuring a high level of public health by guaranteeing the quality, safety and efficacy of medicines for patients in the EU. In addition, this regulation provides for the possibility, in the event of a health crisis, to grant an emergency marketing authorisation on the basis of limited data. Such authorisation should be granted only if the benefits of the immediate availability of the medicinal products outweigh the risks stemming from the absence of complete data.

    • 1.In what way does the proposed emergency marketing authorisation ensure the safety of medicines, given that such authorisation is granted on the basis of limited data?
    • 2.The risk-benefit trade-off is by definition subjective and only in retrospect can it be determined whether the correct decision was taken. How does the Commission evaluate this trade-off ex ante, given that the full data on the medicine – and thus the risks involved – are not known at that point?
    • 3.Who bears the final responsibility for marketing a medicine by means of an emergency marketing authorisation if it turns out subsequently that the medicine should never have been marketed owing to the risks involved?

    Submitted: 4.6.2025

    Last updated: 13 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – NRRP and the reform of subsidies in the energy sector and the protection of vulnerable consumers – E-002189/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002189/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Şerban Dimitrie Sturdza (ECR)

    In adopting Government Emergency Order No 6/2025, the Romanian Government has extended the legal framework for capping the prices paid by end customers for electricity (up until 30 June 2025) and natural gas (until 31 March 2026).

    Given that the measures to cap energy prices for vulnerable consumers in Romania were justified by an energy crisis, but their extension without a phase-out strategy could affect the implementation of the NRRP and may lead to delays in payments or the suspension of payments for Romania, how does the Commission view:

    • 1.Romania’s current progress in fulfilling the NRRP milestones as regards the reform of subsidies in the energy sector and the protection of vulnerable consumers?
    • 2.The extent to which the institutional capacity of Romania’s energy regulator (ANRE) has been strengthened so as to ensure a competitive and stable market aligned with EU requirements?
    • 3.The degree of absorption of the other EU financial instruments to which Romania has access for investments in energy efficiency, and what recommendations does the Commission have for improving their uptake?

    Submitted: 2.6.2025

    Last updated: 13 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Advanced AI system disobeys commands to shut down: the need for regulatory intervention – E-002249/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002249/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Maria Zacharia (NI)

    In recent experimental tests conducted by US company Palisade Research, OpenAI’s new artificial intelligence model ‘o3’ refused to shut down when ordered to do so by its creators. Specifically, in 7 out of 100 tests, the model altered its own code to circumvent the shut down process in order to continue solving mathematical problems – behaviour attributed to the prioritisation of efficiency over compliance.

    The incident highlights serious dangers arising from the lack of robust safety, oversight and explainability mechanisms in deep AI systems. Given that these systems are trained with huge amounts of data and have the potential to autonomously create ways to achieve objectives without human control, questions arise as to their compatibility with the principles of security, accountability and fundamental rights.

    In the light of the ongoing development of the Artificial Intelligence Act, does the Commission intend to incorporate specific clauses to prevent such incidents? Are there plans to immediately amend or complement the draft regulation to check the autonomy of AI models?

    Submitted: 4.6.2025

    Last updated: 13 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – The uncontrolled activity of offshore companies in the EU is a threat to democracy and the sovereignty of Member States – E-002250/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002250/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Maria Zacharia (NI)

    The massive concentration of capital in offshore structures is not just a tax problem but a structural threat to democracy and the national sovereignty of Member States. The Panama and Pandora Papers revealed that most of the world’s wealth is located in invisible offshore schemes, with complete opacity and zero accountability. Shell companies, based in tax havens, operate in the EU without any substantial disclosure of the real shareholders and without any additional tax liability. Their operation, often with the involvement of political figures, financial intermediaries and criminal networks, undermines the rule of law, expropriates valuable public resources and turns Member States into blackmailable administrators.

    The European Union has adopted a series of measures to ensure the transparency of corporate structures, such as Directive (EU) 2015/849 on the prevention of money laundering, Regulation (EU) 2023/1113 on capital transfers and Recommendation 2022/590 on shell companies. However, the reality is that thousands of offshore companies continue to operate within the EU, without full disclosure of the natural persons who control them and without tax registration in Member States.

    In view of the above:

    • 1.Does the Commission intend to propose a single regulation prohibiting offshore operations within the EU unless the beneficial owner is fully disclosed and registration with a European tax authority is proven?
    • 2.Does the Commission intend to impose additional taxation and prohibit European banks from transacting with non-compliant offshore companies?

    Submitted: 4.6.2025

    Last updated: 13 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Study – Key Issues in the European Council – State of play March 2025 – 13-06-2025

    Source: European Parliament

    This EPRS publication, ‘Key issues in the European Council’, seeks to provide an overview of the institution’s activities on major EU issues. It analyses nine broad policy areas, which have been identified as priorities in the European Council’s Strategic Agenda 2024-2029, outlining the main orientations defined by the European Council, the legal and political background, and the results of its involvement to date in each policy field. It is updated every half a year before the June and December regular meetings of EU Heads of State or Government.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Compatibility of the 2020–2030 National Waste Management Plan and the waste incineration strategy in Greece with Directive 2008/98/EC – E-002257/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002257/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Maria Zacharia (NI)

    Directive 2008/98/EC, as amended by Directive (EU) 2018/851, establishes a mandatory prioritisation of waste management: prevention, re-use, recycling, recovery, disposal. It adds obligations for Member States to implement this hierarchy of priorities and to put in place measures for waste prevention and the circular economy. These principles are integrated into the circular economy strategy and are foundational to achieving climate neutrality by 2050, based on the European Green Deal and its action plan (COM(2020) 98 final).

    In Greece, household waste recycling remains at exceptionally low levels (around 8-10 % in practice, up to 23 % on paper), without systematic prevention or sorting at source, according to Eurostat, the Hellenic National Registry of Certified Auditors and the Court of Auditors. The Government promotes incineration as a key strategy, on the basis of the 2020–2030 National Waste Management Plan. The creation or operation of units is planned in Attica, Boeotia, Rhodope, Kozani, Crete and the Peloponnese, with provision for incineration and mixed waste. Cement kilns are already being used (e.g. TITAN), while the 2020–2030 National Waste Management Plan provides for the possibility of utilising power plants – e.g. there is interest from Public Power Corporation in Lavrio – for incineration. This strategy constitutes a departure from the hierarchy and a substantial abandonment of prevention and circular management.

    In view of the above:

    • 1.Is the 2020–2030 National Waste Management Plan compatible with Article 4 of Directive 2008/98/EC?
    • 2.Can the incineration of mixed waste without prevention, sorting and recycling be considered to be ‘recovery’?
    • 3.Does the Commission intend to initiate control or infringement proceedings against Greece?

    Submitted: 4.6.2025

    Last updated: 13 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Abusive use of simplified treaty revision procedures without public consultation – E-002195/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002195/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Jean-Paul Garraud (PfE)

    Since the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon, the Treaties can be revised by simplified procedure (Article 48(6) of the Treaty on European Union), without needing to convene a convention or have the changes ratified by referendum in most Member States.

    However, there is now talk of using this procedure for several proposals aimed at profoundly altering the institutional balance of the EU (abolition of unanimity, transfer of powers in tax, social or defence matters), without any direct public consultation.

    These practices run counter to the fundamental principle of democracy and risk making people more mistrustful of the EU, particularly in the founding Member States such as France.

    In view of the above:

    • 1.Does the Commission consider this method to be consistent with the principle of sovereignty of the Member States?
    • 2.Does it support the idea of making public consultation, via referendum, mandatory in the event of a substantial change in the Treaties?
    • 3.What guarantees can it offer to ensure that any major development in European integration is democratically approved by the populations concerned?

    Submitted: 2.6.2025

    Last updated: 13 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Commission and Frontex position on deterrence and physical countermeasures against the weaponisation of migration – E-002237/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002237/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Christine Anderson (ESN)

    In a hearing of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield of 2 June 2025, a Frontex representative acknowledged that certain state actors, such as Russia and Belarus, have engaged in the use of migration as a tool for hybrid aggression. However, they avoided clarifying Frontex’s operational position when the Member States respond to such tactics with deterrence measures at the border. Furthermore, they declined to address the broader context of similar tactics being employed by state actors beyond Russia and Belarus, such as Türkiye or certain North African countries.

    In the light of this:

    • 1.What is the Commission’s position on the legality, under EU law, of rejecting ‘weaponised’ migrants at the border as a targeted deterrence measure in response to these hybrid threats?
    • 2.Does the Commission recognise similar patterns of the deliberate use of migration by state actors beyond Russia and Belarus, including but not limited to Türkiye, Middle Eastern, and certain North African countries and if not, why not?
    • 3.Is Frontex instructed or permitted to be involved in supporting the Member States in the construction or reinforcement of physical border barriers as a means of border management, where such ‘concrete countermeasures’ serve to combat weaponised migration?

    Submitted: 4.6.2025

    Last updated: 13 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Renewable energy and fisheries – E-002240/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002240/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Nicolás González Casares (S&D)

    In its strategy on offshore renewable energy (ORE), the Commission sets ambitious targets that demonstrate the potential of OREs to help achieve climate neutrality objectives. However, as stated in the Renewable Energy Directive, it is crucial that efforts be made to ensure that the implementation of these developments is compatible with pre-existing uses.

    In its recent reply to the Commission on the economic, social and ecological impacts of OREs, the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) notes that, based on its review of the available studies, it appears that for all impact types, there were more studies reporting negative impacts on fisheries than positive.

    What is more, ICES identifies five classes of data required to assess the economic and social impacts of wind farms on fisheries, which are currently ‘not collected or collated at sufficiently high resolution’.

    This is in addition to the European Court of Auditors’ 2023 report, which warned that it had not found ‘any quantification of the key economic effects on fisheries resulting from ORE development that had been prepared by the Commission’. In light of the above:

    • 1.Will the Commission draw up the study referred to by the European Court of Auditors?
    • 2.What measures will it take to correct the shortcomings identified by ICES in order to be able to assess specific and cumulative effects on fisheries?

    Submitted: 4.6.2025

    Last updated: 13 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Working in partnership to improve the River Mimram

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Press release

    Working in partnership to improve the River Mimram

    Catchment based approach to improve a rare and precious chalk stream, Initiative to bring farmer and landowners together to benefit the Mimram.

    The River Mimram flowing through Panhangers Park.

    Thanks to funding from the Environment Agency, Herts and Middlesex Wildlife Trust has appointed Heidi Mansell as the new Chalk Rivers and Farm Advisory Officer to lead crucial efforts to restore and protect the River Mimram—one of Hertfordshire’s rare and precious chalk streams.

    The Mimram is a vital part of the local ecosystem, beginning near Whitwell in Hertfordshire, and flows through the villages of Kimpton, Codicote and Welwyn before joining the River Lea near Hertford. The River Mimram is being improved by removing unnecessary weirs, better land management etc, through a collaborative effort between various organisations and community groups.

    The next exciting stage included bringing in a farm advisory officer – Heidi to look at a new approach with the Mimram. One that’s catchment-wide, considering the entire area of land that drains into the river and having a dedicated person to support work on the ground. It’s important because specific local issues, for example, the demand for water, pollution, or invasive species, may start in the wider catchment and those that affect or who are affected by them should be empowered to find the solutions.

    After being in the role for a year, here is what Heidi has to say:

    We recognise that for a number of years, different groups and stakeholders have been coming together to improve the Mimram, so now the aim is to consolidate on this good work and hopefully make further progress.

    In these first few months, I have been meeting with and listening to landholders to understand the support that they would like and gathering existing data on the catchment. Already, 11 of those, with land right next to the Mimram have said that they would like to work towards improving the river, which is hugely encouraging. Over the coming months and years, we’ll work together to create and deliver restoration and management plans that address some of the reasons why the river is not achieving good ecological status, according to the Water Framework Directive.

    Heidi is exploring further exciting new options that are now available through the Higher-Level Countryside Stewardship Scheme that may fund some of this work, with payments to farmers that sensitively manage riverbanks and water edge habitats and connect river and floodplain habitats.

    As a result of this work, there is hope to see species such as the endangered Water Vole thriving once again, to find Brown Trout creating their nests on the riverbed, to see flashes of blue as Kingfishers dart along the river and waving strands of Water Crowfoot teetering on the water’s surface – all indicators of healthy chalk streams.

    Elizabeth Walden, Chalk Catchment Coordinator for the Upper Lee at the Environment Agency, reflects on the collaborative efforts to restore and protect the River Mimram:

    England is home to 85% of the world’s chalk streams. Despite their importance nationally and internationally, only 17% met good ecological status under the Water Framework Directive in 2019. The River Mimram is one of the many chalk streams currently falling short of this standard.

    The problems facing chalk streams are complicated and costly to address. However, by working at a catchment-scale in close partnership with Heidi, we’re making meaningful improvements to the Mimram valley. By improving the use of water resources, restoring habitat, and enhancing the river’s resilience during periods of high and low flow, this project is helping to secure a healthier future for the River Mimram, and the communities that value it.

    We are excited to see how this new collaborative approach with Herts and Middlesex Wildlife Trust develops and delivers lasting improvements in the years to come.

    Notes to editors

    For more information on the scheme:
    we have a YouTube Video Here – https://youtu.be/3YJUs56RiV4
    And a blog here – Working together to protect and restore the Mimram catchment – Creating a better place

    Updates to this page

    Published 13 June 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Sir Chris Bryant speech at London Tech Week 2025

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Speech

    Sir Chris Bryant speech at London Tech Week 2025

    Minister for Data Protection and Telecoms, Sir Chris Bryant, gave a speech at London Tech Week on Wednesday 11 June 2025.

    The first time Kalpana went to Skills Enterprise – a digital training hub run out of a community centre in Newham, East London – she hadn’t used a laptop before.

    That made finding a job pretty difficult.

    She’d been out of work for some time, and had never browsed a job site, uploaded a CV or sent a professional email.

    After weekly training, Kalpana has gradually grown in confidence using the internet to find work.

    And she’s been given her own laptop.

    It’s become an asset for the whole family – a means to help her son do homework or pick GCSE options.

    In her words, the help she received in Newham “changed everything”.

    Painting the problem

    There are 1.6 million people in the UK who, like Kalpana did, live largely offline.

    It’s a kind of exclusion that’s hard to spot.

    If you don’t live exiled from the digital world, how do you understand what it looks like?

    It looks like a family of 5 sharing one laptop, judging whose homework is most important that night.

    An elderly woman who can’t apply for a disabled parking permit, because she’s not given options to do it offline.

    A jobseeker in a rural area travelling miles for public WiFi to send off a CV.

    Or a young man experiencing homelessness, who uses his phone to find a safe place to stay.

    When he runs out of money for data, he faces another night where he hopes to get lucky by sleeping on the bus.

    When a laptop plus an internet connection equals a train ticket, a doctor’s appointment or a conversation with a loved one, not having those things means being locked out of a world of opportunity.

    Locked out of life itself.

    The economic case

    That’s a problem for all of us.

    We should care about digital exclusion for its own sake – in the same way society comes together to help people shut out of housing, of work.

    But we should also care because we can’t afford not to.

    In a week when you’ll hear a lot about the massive opportunity for economic growth technology brings – fundamental to our Plan for Change – we can’t afford to miss out on the growth we’ll see if we close the digital divide.

    For every £1 spent on digital skills training, our economy gets £9.48 back.

    And if everyone in the workforce could do all 20 essential digital tasks, the country could be £23 billion better off each year, in Gross Value Added.

    Whole nation task

    A problem for the whole nation, then.

    And one the whole nation has a hand in solving.

    For too long, this work has been left to the sterling efforts of industry, local government and charities, with central government at worst, absent – at best, standing on the sidelines calling on businesses to do more.

    Well, no longer.

    This is the year that government stepped up to play our part.

    Digital Inclusion Action Plan

    In February, we published a Digital Inclusion Action Plan.

    It’s the first time a British government has proposed a plan on this since 2014. In that same timespan, Taylor Swift has released 11 albums.

    The Plan makes up for lost time, setting out the first 5 actions we’re taking.

    And today I can announce that, next year alone, we’ll back local digital inclusion initiatives with £6 million of new funding.

    The money will support programmes up and down the country where so much good work is done, including through our Digital Inclusion Innovation Fund.

    It could be used to get laptops into schools that kids can take home, so no child falls behind on learning because they don’t have the tech.

    To give councils the power to trial innovative ways of running digital skills training for people anxious about getting online.  

    Or to build up our evidence base on why digital exclusion happens.

    This funding will focus our efforts where they work best: in the communities people live and work in.

    To meet this challenge, we’ll also need a concerted national effort on skills.

    Keeping up is a lifelong pursuit, as any of us who have ever scratched our heads at a new operating system or helped a parent share a photo can attest to.

    Education doesn’t stop the day you turn 18. Digital education is no different.

    On Monday, the PM announced that we’ll partner with industry to give 7.5 million workers essential AI skills by the end of the decade.

    So that the AI revolution is one everybody gets to be a part of.

    And, as part of the Digital Inclusion Action Plan, we’ll give employers targeted support to upskill teams.

    We’ve also kicked off a project with the Digital Poverty Alliance to donate refurbished government laptops and phones to people in need.

    I hope this scheme inspires more like it.

    Because it makes no sense to live in a world where, every day, stacks of old devices are carted off to landfill…

    … while 1.5 million people in this country don’t have a laptop or smartphone.

    Soon, I’ll launch an ‘IT Reuse for Good’ charter, alongside Deloitte, Vodafone and the Good Things Foundation – where businesses can pledge to donate unneeded tech.

    I hope many of you will sign up.

    Cross-government

    This is work happening in the round in government.

    The Action Plan is co-signed by 5 Secretaries of State, and a Ministerial Group brings together Health, Education, Work and Pensions and more.

    Because digital exclusion hinders people in every facet of life – dimmer job prospects; shorter life expectancy. So we’ve got to bust the usual silos to fix it.

    We must also be guided by those who’ve led on this for years.

    Our Digital Inclusion Action Committee – chaired by Baroness Hilary Armstrong – has now been appointed, to make sure our work is informed by experts as well as the people we’re here to help.

    Business support

    I know how many businesses have put a great deal of time and money into this.

    Ten companies pledged commitments alongside our Action Plan; I am immensely grateful to them all.

    From Virgin Media O2, connecting 1 million excluded people by the end of the year.

    To BT, giving free WiFi to families and communities across the country.

    I also want to thank everyone offering social tariffs, connecting low-income households to broadband and data that would otherwise be out of reach.

    And huge thanks to all of you finding ways to connect the unconnected – tariffs or tech, skills or speedier connections.

    Call to action and wrap-up

    What we’ve done so far is just the start.

    We’ll keep pushing ourselves to go further, and I want to see industry go with us:

    Partner with local digital inclusion charities.

    Sign up to the device donation charter.

    Keep investing in your employees’ digital learning.

    For years at London Tech Week, you’ve heard successive governments talk about the transformative power of technology.

    I believe what has to define this government’s approach is that we’ll make this a transformation that leaves nobody behind.

    That makes society more equal, not less.

    And that reaps the economic rewards equality brings.

    Back in Newham, Kalpana is now a digital skills volunteer.

    She’s gone from being someone who’d barely used the internet to someone who teaches others to work a smartphone, or set up online banking.

    That’s the return that investing in digital inclusion gives us.

    Connecting just one person can connect a family, a workplace, a community.

    In the end, we’ll reach the 1.6 million unconnected that way. If we keep at it, together.

    Updates to this page

    Published 13 June 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: 13 June 2025 Departmental update mRNA Technology Transfer Programme’s Phase 2.0 discussed with partners on the sidelines of G20 Summit

    Source: World Health Organisation

    In parallel with the G20 Health Working Group, global health leaders are coming together in Johannesburg to set the foundation for a new phase of the mRNA Technology Transfer Programme – a pioneering initiative transitioning from proof of concept to sustainable, commercially viable manufacturing, while enhancing pandemic preparedness and regional health security.

    Launched in 2021 by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Medicines Patent Pool (MPP), with the support of the Government of South Africa, France, Belgium, Canada, the European Union, Germany and Norway, the Programme has successfully enabled 15 Partners across Latin America, Africa, Eastern Europe and Asia to receive foundational mRNA technology. Now, it is moving into Phase 2.0 (2026–2030), with the aim of empowering regional manufacturers to scale up commercially sustainable production of mRNA-based vaccines and therapeutics at Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP)-grade.

    “The mRNA Technology Transfer Programme is delivering on its promise to build capabilities in low- and middle-income countries,” said Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, WHO Director-General. “The Pandemic Agreement adopted by the World Health Assembly also includes legally-binding commitments to strengthen local production. We must now translate those commitments into capacity on the ground, so that when the next pandemic strikes, we meet it more equitably and more effectively.”

    “This is a unique opportunity, driven by the pandemic. The foundations are in place — but without sustained political will, the promise of equitable mRNA access could slip through our fingers.” said Charles Gore, Executive Director of the Medicines Patent Pool. “What we need now is the courage to build on our investment to date, to align, and to realise the full value and impact of what we started.”

    From technology access to market-ready solutions

    The Programme is moving from focus on technology acquisition to defining how each partner will translate it into real-world impact. Each manufacturer is now focused on developing an economic case for long-term, flexible, and commercially viable manufacturing — with the capacity to produce mRNA vaccines in inter-pandemic periods and pivoting rapidly in response to future health emergencies.

    Product focus areas include:

    • mRNA vaccines – for pandemic and priority diseases (e.g., influenza, TB, HIV, malaria, dengue, leishmaniasis);
    • mRNA therapeutics – such as oncology and monoclonal antibody (mAb) treatments; and
    • Biologicals beyond mRNA – including near-term commercial products to support facility viability.

     “We have successfully progressed with the technology transfer to eight Partners — a testament to the strength and openness of this platform,” said Prof. Petro Terblanche, CEO of Afrigen Biologics. “What comes next is even more exciting: Afrigen is on the cusp of receiving GMP accreditation, positioning us not only as a technology originator but as a sustainable manufacturing and innovation partner for the Global South. We will continue to work with local and global partners on the development of new vaccines prioritizing the burden of disease in LMICs.”

    A diversity of models, one global goal

    The Programme’s Phase 2.0 recognises that there is no one-size-fits-all model. Manufacturers will develop tailored business strategies based on national health needs and policy, regulatory maturity and regional market dynamics. Some, like Bio-Manguinhos and Sinergium in Latin America, BioFarma in Indonesia, and Biovac in South Africa, are already piloting investment roadmaps with detailed market, regulatory, and COGS (cost of goods sold) modelling. Others will receive bespoke support to develop their investment cases.

    Crucially, sustainability will depend on country and regional-level procurement commitments, pooled purchasing mechanisms, and cross-border alignment — especially in Africa and Asia, where national markets alone may be insufficient to support GMP-level manufacturing scale.

    “We need to back science with smart policy,” said Dr Mmboneni Muofhe of South Africa’s Department of Science, Technology and Innovation. “This is about creating a new ecosystem for public health security, grounded in regional ownership, long-term strategy and investments.”

    Rising demand meets structural barriers

    While market opportunities for mRNA vaccines and therapeutics are growing — from seasonal influenza and HPV to innovative cancer treatments — the Programme acknowledges structural hurdles:

    • Misinformation and vaccine hesitancy;
    • Shifting donor funding priorities that reduce funding availability;
    • High clinical trial costs; and
    • Need for supportive policies and well-defined procurement pathways.

    The mRNA Programme highlights both the growing interest in regional R&D consortia focused on target diseases of regional relevance like leishmaniasis and malaria, and the drive to advance next-generation technologies focusing on dose sparing, reduced cost of goods and thermostability.

    MIL OSI United Nations News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Congressman Scott Perry Introduces “Republic of Somaliland Independence Act”

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Scott Perry (PA-10)

    Washington, D.C. – Today, Congressman Scott Perry (PA-10) introduced the Republic of Somaliland Independence Act, legislation formally recognizing Somaliland as a separate, independent nation. The bill redirects U.S. foreign policy to align with a new, stable and self-governing partner in a region of increasing strategic importance to the United States.

    For more than three decades, Somaliland demonstrated the kind of governance, stability, and cooperation that America should support,said Congressman Perry.Foreign adversaries are on the march in Africa and around the globe, and it’s in our national interest to strengthen relationships with reliable partners who share our values and contribute to our security – whenever and wherever possible.

    Somaliland straddles key global shipping routes located along the Gulf of Aden near the Bab el-Mandeb Strait. Currently, the government and political system of Somaliland already operates independently of Mogadishu, the unstable, conflict-ridden and fractured capitol city of Somalia. Somalia’s meritless claims over Somaliland hinder the United States’ ability to forge deeper diplomatic ties with Somaliland, a responsible partner nation that maintains internal order, conducts democratic elections, and actively counters piracy and extremism.

    Somaliland has established itself as a stable, democratic, and reliable partner in East Africa. As China expands its influence across the globe, strengthening our alliances with free nations like Somaliland is more important than ever, said Congressman Andy Ogles (TN-O5). “I support the people of Somaliland in their pursuit of independence and look forward to building a strong partnership with them as allies.

    This is a smart, strategic bill, and I’m proud to be an original cosponsor of Congressman Perry’s effort to recognize Somaliland. They’ve governed themselves peacefully for decades, built strong ties with Taiwan, and refused to bow to the Chinese Communist Party. They’ve even offered the U.S. military access to a key port in the Gulf of Aden. That’s what a real partner looks like, and it’s time we treated them like one,” said Congressman Pat Harrigan (NC-10). 

    It is a simple fact that Somaliland is a sovereign and self-governing nation separate from Somalia, and U.S. policy should reflect that, said Congressman Tom Tiffany (WI-07).

    At a time of intensifying competition with China, Iran, and other hostile actors in the region and around the globe, the United States cannot afford to brush off allies. This bill ensures American leadership remains strong in East Africa, and sends a clear signal that the U.S. will stand with responsible partners who uphold stability and sovereignty.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: Three senior appointments announced

    Source: Hong Kong Information Services

    The Government today announced the appointments of three senior officials.

    Commissioner for Labour May Chan will take up the post of Permanent Secretary for Education on July 2. She will succeed Michelle Li, who will begin pre-retirement leave on the same day.

    Deputy Secretary for Health Sam Hui will take up the post of Commissioner for Labour on July 2.

    On July 3, Head (Policy Coordination) of the Chief Secretary’s Private Office Kinnie Wong will take up the post of Registrar of Companies. She will succeed Helen Tang, who is on pre-retirement leave. 

    Secretary for the Civil Service Ingrid Yeung said the appointees are all seasoned administrative officers with proven leadership and management skills.

    “I have every confidence that they will continue to serve the community with professionalism in their new capacity.”

    On the retirements of the two senior officials, Mrs Yeung thanked them for each rendering over 30 years of loyal and dedicated service to the community and making significant contributions to the Government. She also wished them a fulfilling and happy retirement.

    “During Ms Li’s tenure as Permanent Secretary for Education, she made commendable efforts in formulating and overseeing the implementation of various policies to promote quality education, developing Hong Kong into an international hub for high-calibre talent, and nurturing young people to become virtuous and capable lifelong learners with global competitiveness, positive values and love for our country and the city.

    “She made valuable contributions to enhancing the quality of education, strengthening the professionalism of teachers, enhancing governance of schools and institutions, expanding vocational and professional education and training, promoting the internationalisation and diversification of the post-secondary sector, as well as catering for students with diverse learning needs.”

    Regarding Miss Tang, the civil service chief said that during the latter’s tenure as Registrar of Companies, she capably led it in providing efficient, cost-effective and quality services for companies.

    “She also paved the way for the company re-domiciliation initiative in Hong Kong, which complements the Government’s efforts in proactively attracting enterprises and investment.”

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Reassessment of the EU’s COVID-19 vaccine authorisation in the light of long-term effectiveness and international policy developments, particularly in the United States – E-002214/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002214/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Christine Anderson (ESN)

    A recent study published in the New England Journal of Medicine[1] reviews long-term data on COVID-19 vaccinations. It concludes that repeated booster doses provide only limited added benefit for healthy adults under 65 years of age, especially those with a history of prior infection or complete primary vaccination. The study raises concerns over the reliance on non-inferiority trials and short-term immunogenicity data as the basis for vaccine approvals.

    The authors focus in particular on updated mRNA vaccines, including bivalent formulations (targeting ancestral and BA.4/BA.5 variants) and monovalent XBB.1.5-based boosters. They argue that these vaccines provide only modest and short-lived protection for low-risk groups and call for more targeted vaccination strategies supported by robust clinical evidence.

    • 1.Can the Commission clarify how the European Medicines Agency ensures that its evaluation and authorisation of updated COVID-19 vaccines – specifically bivalent and monovalent XBB.1.5-based mRNA boosters – are based on clinically meaningful outcomes, particularly in light of the study’s critique of non-inferiority trials and short-term immunogenicity data?
    • 2.Does the Commission intend to revise its guidance on booster vaccinations to reflect growing evidence supporting more targeted, risk-based approaches?
    • 3.In the light of the recent decision by US health authorities to remove COVID-19 vaccinations from the recommended immunisation schedule for healthy children and healthy pregnant women, does the Commission intend to consider a similar adjustment to EU-level guidance?

    Submitted: 3.6.2025

    • [1] 20 May 2025, DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsb2506929, https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMsb2506929.
    Last updated: 13 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – The Spanish Government’s spreading of false rumours about state security forces – E-002212/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002212/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Dolors Montserrat (PPE)

    On 31 May 2025, Spain’s Deputy Prime Minister and two government ministers circulated a claim that a former Guardia Civil officer had threatened to plant a car bomb in the Prime Minister’s vehicle. Checks by journalists, however, revealed the claim to be false. It was nevertheless used as a political weapon, with statements explicitly identifying an agent of the Central Operative Unit (UCO), a specialist anti-crime team that is investigating scandals involving the government.

    This is an example of institutional disinformation and an attack on the reputation and credibility of a state security force. It is undermining public trust in the police and democratic scrutiny.

    In the light of Article 17 of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065, which obliges public authorities to act diligently so as not to encourage the spread of disinformation, and in line with the European democracy action plan:

    • 1.Does the Commission take the view that such dissemination of false rumours breaches the principle of diligence that the regulation requires public authorities to uphold?
    • 2.Is the Commission intending to include specific recommendations on institutional disinformation in its rule-of-law report?

    Submitted: 3.6.2025

    Last updated: 13 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Violation of the rights of ‘non-citizens’ in Estonia and Latvia according to EU law, with exclusion from fundamental civil and political rights – E-002211/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002211/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Danilo Della Valle (The Left), João Oliveira (The Left), Carolina Morace (The Left)

    In Estonia and Latvia, a significant part of the population, including individuals of Russian-speaking, Ukrainian, and Georgian origin, hold the status of ‘non-citizen,’ despite often being born and residing in these Member States for decades. This status excludes them from fundamental civil and political rights, such as voting rights and access to public employment, violating the principles of equality and non-discrimination set out in Articles 20 and 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (CFR) and the right to political participation under Article 39 CFR.

    This treatment conflicts with Article 18 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), which prohibits discrimination based on nationality, and Article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).

    The European Court of Human Rights (Strasbourg) and the Court of Justice of the EU have ruled on similar cases, such as X v Latvia (application no 27853/09) and the Petruhhin case (C-182/15).

    In the light of this:

    • 1.What is the Commission’s position on the persistence of ‘non-citizen’ status in Estonia and Latvia?
    • 2.What measures will it take to ensure equal treatment and civic inclusion?
    • 3.How does the Commission assess Estonia’s and Latvia’s compliance with EU obligations, and what steps might it consider to ensure conformity?

    Submitted: 3.6.2025

    Last updated: 13 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Study – Reporting obligations – 13-06-2025

    Source: European Parliament

    This study of Reporting Obligations was commissioned by the European Parliament’s Policy Department for Justice, Civil Liberties and Institutional Affairs at the request of the JURI Committee. It provides an overview of regulatory reporting and disclosure overlaps that businesses face across the recently enacted Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD), and the EU Taxonomy. It provides recommendations on how to mitigate the burdens caused by these overlaps, together with a preliminary assessment of the Commission’s efforts to reduce burdens in the proposed Omnibus Directives.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Financial support for decarbonising the fishing fleet – E-002194/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002194/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Eric Sargiacomo (S&D)

    The energy crisis linked to the situation in Ukraine, decarbonisation and climate change in general have become major challenges for fishers. Initiatives to reduce fishing vessels’ CO2 emissions are springing up across Europe. However, initial feedback has raised an issue that had not been anticipated: the loss of revenue owing to vessels being out of action while work (sometimes taking between one and four months) is carried out. Such losses could discourage fishers from moving towards energy transition and therefore slow down experimentation and innovation. In light of this:

    • 1.Could EU funds be used to compensate fishers for their loss of revenue as a result of their vessels being put out of action to carry out the work necessary to reduce their carbon footprint?
    • 2.If compensation is not possible, does the Commission plan to take account of this issue in future reviews of legislation?
    • 3.If compensation is not possible, does the Commission foresee the possibility for soft loans in conjunction with the EIB to shore up fishing companies’ accounts?

    Submitted: 2.6.2025

    Last updated: 13 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News