NewzIntel.com

Category: DJF

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Implementation of the judgment of the General Court in Case T-36/23 (access to SMS correspondence with Pfizer) – P-002273/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Priority question for written answer  P-002273/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Fabio De Masi (NI)

    On 14 May 2025, the General Court (Case T-36/23) ruled that the Commission had wrongfully denied access to certain text messages between Commission President von der Leyen and the CEO of Pfizer.

    Does the Commission intend to respect the Court’s ruling and disclose the messages in question, or does it plan to appeal the judgment?

    Submitted: 5.6.2025

    Last updated: 10 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: U.S. Representative Cory Mills along with a group of bi-partisan legislators just introduced the COLLISION-LIMITING OPERATIONAL UPGRADE FOR DOD (CLOUD) AIRCRAFT ACT

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Cory Mills Florida (7th District)

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

    CLOUD Aviation Act

    Washington, D.C. – U.S. Representative Cory Mills along with a group of bi-partisan legislators just introduced the COLLISION-LIMITING OPERATIONAL UPGRADE FOR DOD (CLOUD) AIRCRAFT ACT.

    This bill directs the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Federal Aviation Administration, to conduct a feasibility study on equipping all Department of Defense (DoD) fixed and rotary wing aircraft that operate in highly trafficked domestic airspaces with air-to-air and air-to-ground collision detection systems. These systems must be compatible with civilian commercial aircraft.

    This initiative comes in response to the tragic accident on January 29, 2025, between American Airlines Flight 5342 and a U.S. Army Black Hawk PAT-25, which resulted in the deaths of 67 passengers. Currently, not all DoD aircraft are required to have the same type of collision detection or avoidance systems that are compatible with civilian commercial aircraft.

    Moreover, these systems are not always activated while flying in congested city airspace or the airspace of large commercial airports. This discrepancy has contributed to unsafe flying conditions, putting service members, civilians, and emergency responders at unnecessary risk. The proposed bill aims to address this issue by mandating a comprehensive study to determine the feasibility, costs, associated operational risks, and implementation timelines of equipping military aircraft with the appropriate collision detection and/or avoidance systems. By doing so, the study will help increase safety for all aircraft operating in the same congested airspace as civilian commercial aircraft. 

    Congressman Cory Mills said, “As an Army combat veteran, I understand the importance of equipping our servicemen with the tools they need to operate both safely and effectively. After the tragic loss of 67 lives earlier this year in the collision at Reagan National Airport, it is important we enhance safety for our troops, our civilians, and our first responders who share our busy domestic airspaces. This bill strengthens our military’s readiness while ensuring the DoD has the resources to keep our citizens and skies safe. This is a critical first step toward broader aviation safety reforms to prevent future tragedies and improve airspace coordination nationwide.”

    “As a 25-year Army veteran and a Virginian, I know how critical it is to my community and our country that we ensure the safety of both military and civilian aircrafts operating in shared airspace. The CLOUD Aircraft Act is a smart, commonsense step to prevent avoidable tragedies and save lives. I’m proud to support this bipartisan effort to modernize our aviation safety standards,” said Congressman Eugene Vindman (VA-07).

    “As a Navy veteran and member of the House Armed Services Committee, I know how critical safety is in every phase of military aviation. The CLOUD Aircraft Act is a commonsense step toward enhancing flight safety for our service members and the communities they operate near. By studying the feasibility of equipping military aircraft with modern collision detection systems, we can reduce risk in crowded airspaces, align with FAA best practices, and help prevent tragic accidents before they happen. I’m proud to support this effort to bring greater safety, accountability, and modernization to our skies,” said Congresswoman Jen Kiggans (VA-02).

    “As a Marine aviator and a House Armed Services Committee member, I am committed to the safety of our servicemembers and civilians. The tragic collision between American Airlines Flight 5342 and Army Black Hawk PAT-25 highlights the urgent need for action. That’s why I am proud to cosponsor the CLOUD Aircraft Act, directing the Secretary of Defense to study equipping military aircraft with collision detection systems compatible with civilian aircraft. This crucial step will enhance safety in congested domestic airspaces, prevent future tragedies, and protect those who serve alongside the American people. I urge my colleagues to support this vital legislation,” said Congressman Rich McCormick (GA-07).

    “My home district leads the way in the aviation industry, so I have a particular interest in exploring any opportunity to improve our outdated systems. Secretary Duffy and Administrator Rocheleau share our focus on the modernization of the National Airspace System, and I believe that this bill is a critical step in the right direction. That is why I am so glad to work with Mr. Mills on such a proactive and prudent piece of legislation,” said Congressman Frank Lucas (OK-03).

    Co-Sponsors: Congressman Eugene Vindman (VA-07), Congresswoman Jen Kiggans (VA-02), Congressman Rich McCormick (GA-07), Congressman Frank Lucas (OK-03).

    ###

    For inquires contact julie.singleton@mail.house.gov or jillian.anderson@mail.house.gov 

    About Cory Mills: Congressman Cory Mills represents Florida’s 7th Congressional District and serves on the House Foreign Affairs and Armed Services Committees. A veteran of the U.S. Army, Mills is committed to protecting American sovereignty, strengthening national security, and promoting economic opportunity for a

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Congresswoman Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick Launches “Fight Back Tour” Across South Florida

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congresswoman Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick (D-Florida 20th district))

    TAMARAC, FL – Congresswoman Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick (D-FL) is hitting the road with her Fight Back Tour, a district-wide initiative that will uplift families, amplify local voices, and confront the everyday challenges that communities across South Florida are facing. 

    As part of the “100 Stops Tour,” Congresswoman Cherfilus-McCormick (D-FL) has spent the past several months visiting neighborhoods, community centers, churches, schools, and small businesses—listening directly to constituents and taking their concerns straight to Washington. 

    “Families are facing so much right now—from skyrocketing housing costs and health care challenges to attacks on civil rights and economic opportunity,” said Congresswoman Cherfilus-McCormick (D-FL). “This tour is about fighting back together. We’re meeting people where they are and standing up for what matters most.” 

    The Fight Back Tour highlights Congresswoman Cherfilus McCormick’s (D-FL) commitment to accessible leadership and responsive policy. It serves as a platform to inform residents of federal resources available to them, hear firsthand what’s impacting daily life, and build collective momentum to address critical issues like housing affordability, reproductive rights, immigration, economic justice, and climate resilience. 

    With over 100 planned stops across South Florida, the tour prioritizes outreach to those too often left out of the conversation. 

    “We don’t have time to sit back. Our rights, our families, and our future are on the line,” added Congresswoman Cherfilus-McCormick (D-FL). “This is more than a tour—it’s a movement. And we’re not done yet.” 

    To find out when Congresswoman Cherfilus-McCormick (D-FL) will be in your city and how to get involved, visit her social media pages and follow the conversation using #FightBack. 

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Conditions for CITES certification of brown bear meat in Slovakia – P-002233/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Priority question for written answer  P-002233/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Michal Wiezik (Renew)

    Slovakia authorised the culling of 350 bears following an amendment of the emergency law allowing the culling of brown bears in 55 of the country’s 79 districts.

    Last week[1] a decision about the sale of bear meat was taken. As the Slovak populations of brown bear are listed in Appendix II to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), the meat will need to be certified in order to be sold.

    • 1.What action, if any, is the Commission considering taking in relation to the Slovak emergency law vis-à-vis the provisions of the Habitats Directive[2]?
    • 2.If the Commission launches an infringement action, would it have any impact on the legality of proceeds and products (meat) from the culled brown bears and CITES certification?
    • 3.If infringement proceedings are launched, even if they would not affect the legality of bear meat sales, could the Commission nevertheless impose interim measures putting on hold any CITES certification and barring the sale of the meat from brown bears culled in Slovakia?

    Submitted: 4.6.2025

    • [1] Mäso z problémových medveďov bude dodávané do reštaurácií. Musí však spĺňať podmienky, avizuje F. Kuffa, TASR, 27 May 2025. Available at: https://tvnoviny.sk/domace/clanok/969937-maeso-z-problemovych-medvedov-bude-dodavane-do-restauracii-musi-vsak-splnat-podmienky-avizuje-f-kuffa?utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook&fbclid=IwQ0xDSwKieHVleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHtyX0ev2JZ_0-dvREf5rRo5OdES1MLUSM4Gt-H7feLwiZsWN_WUJwqWLCpLc_aem_BB6rpar2R0RjCK6aQ7RIsg&campaignsrc=tn_clipboard#Echobox=1748341100. Also reported by the BBC at https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c4gkpy3x3ndo.
    • [2] Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora, OJ L 206, 22.7.1992, p. 7, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/1992/43/oj.
    Last updated: 10 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Influence of the Muslim Brotherhood in the EU – P-002185/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Priority question for written answer  P-002185/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Marion Maréchal (ECR), Guillaume Peltier (ECR), Laurence Trochu (ECR), Nicolas Bay (ECR), Adrian-George Axinia (ECR), Sergio Berlato (ECR), Irmhild Boßdorf (ESN), Stefano Cavedagna (ECR), Carlo Ciccioli (ECR), Alessandro Ciriani (ECR), Carlo Fidanza (ECR), Chiara Gemma (ECR), Christophe Gomart (PPE), Paolo Inselvini (ECR), Virginie Joron (PfE), Fernand Kartheiser (NI), Sarah Knafo (ESN), Rihards Kols (ECR), Lara Magoni (ECR), Giuseppe Milazzo (ECR), Tiago Moreira de Sá (PfE), Denis Nesci (ECR), Michele Picaro (ECR), Daniele Polato (ECR), Nicola Procaccini (ECR), Ruggero Razza (ECR), Volker Schnurrbusch (ESN), Diego Solier (ECR), Dominik Tarczyński (ECR), Francesco Torselli (ECR), Sebastian Tynkkynen (ECR), Ivaylo Valchev (ECR), Francesco Ventola (ECR), Kosma Złotowski (ECR), Daniel Obajtek (ECR), António Tânger Corrêa (PfE), Stephen Nikola Bartulica (ECR)

    The report ‘Muslim Brotherhood and political radical Islam in France’, commissioned by the French Government, documents the worrying rise of political radical Islam in France. It also emphasises the European dimension of the Muslim Brotherhood and the culpable naivety of the Commission.

    The report highlights the Brotherhood’s network on our continent and its lobbying of European institutions[1]. As a result, the Muslim Brotherhood has become a ‘regular partner’ of the Commission and receives copious EU subsidies. This is the case for the Forum of European Muslim Youth and Student Organisations, the youth branch of the Council of European Muslims, the ‘keystone’ of the European Muslim Brotherhood, and for Islamic Relief Worldwide and other organisations.

    Worse still, the French Ministry of Higher Education is concerned about the proliferation of projects funded by Erasmus+ involving radical Islam activism in universities. Finally, the report claims that members of the European External Action Service have received training from a former adviser to Mohamed Morsi.

    Will the Commission:

    • 1.admit that the Muslim Brotherhood is pursuing a strategy of influencing and infiltrating into the EU institutions?
    • 2.carry out a full audit of subsidies granted to non-governmental organisations that are likely to be linked to radical Islam?
    • 3.work towards banning the Muslim Brotherhood in the EU, as Austria has already done?

    Supporters[2]

    Submitted: 30.5.2025

    • [1] https://www.lefigaro.fr/actualite-france/reseaux-tentaculaires-organisation-secrete-quartiers-islamises-le-rapport-choc-sur-les-freres-musulmans-qui-veulent-instaurer-la-charia-en-france-20250520.
    • [2] This question is supported by Members other than the authors: Beatrice Timgren (ECR), Elena Donazzan (ECR), Hans Neuhoff (ESN), Alexander Sell (ESN), Kristoffer Storm (ECR), Alexandr Vondra (ECR), Charlie Weimers (ECR), Dick Erixon (ECR), Mariateresa Vivaldini (ECR), Emmanouil Fragkos (ECR), Georgiana Teodorescu (ECR), Galato Alexandraki (ECR), Anja Arndt (ESN)

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: RECOMMENDATION FOR A DECISION to raise no objections to the Commission delegated regulation of 21 May 2025 amending Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/370 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2115 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the time period to submit requests for amendments of CAP Strategic Plans – B10-0276/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development
    Member responsible: Veronika Vrecionová 

    B10‑0276/2025

    Draft European Parliament decision to raise no objections to the Commission delegated regulation of 21 May 2025 amending Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/370 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2115 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the time period to submit requests for amendments of CAP Strategic Plans

    (C(2025)03151 – 2025/2728(DEA))

    The European Parliament,

    – having regard to the Commission delegated regulation (C(2025)03151),

    – having regard to the Commission’s letter of 21 May 2025 asking Parliament to declare that it will raise no objections to the delegated regulation,

    – having regard to the letter from the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development to the Chair of the Conference of Committee Chairs of 3 June 2025,

    – having regard to Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

    – having regard to Regulation (EU) 2021/2115 of the European Parliament and of the Council[1], and in particular Article 122, point (a), thereof,

    – having regard to Rule 114(6) of its Rules of Procedure,

    – having regard to the recommendation for a decision of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development,

    A. whereas, in the current context of ongoing instability in the agricultural sector across the Union several Member States are already encountering difficulties in deciding in the early months of 2025 on the need to review their transfer decisions taken in 2022 pursuant to Article 17(5), Article 88(7) and Article 103 of Regulation (EU) 2021/2115, and it is therefore considered necessary to provide Member States with additional time to plan those transfers;

    B. whereas the time limit laid down in Article 3(4) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/370[2] expires on 31 May 2025; whereas it is therefore of utmost importance to establish a new time limit of 31 August 2025 for the submission of requests for amendment as soon as possible, in order to allow for appropriate planning and consideration by Member States;

    C. whereas Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/370 should therefore be amended accordingly;

    1. Declares that it has no objections to the delegated regulation;

    2. Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and the Commission.

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Protection of the Holy Monastery of Sinai – E-002184/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002184/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Yannis Maniatis (S&D)

    The Holy Monastery of Saint Catherine of the God-Trodden Mount Sinai, located in the foothills of Mount Horeb, is an immortal symbol of the coexistence of the three Abrahamic religions. Founded in 548 AD, it is the world’s oldest continuously inhabited Christian monastery and listed as a World Heritage Site. Last week, an Egyptian court handed down a ruling reportedly stripping the monks of their ownership rights over the monastery and its surrounding lands. According to reports, the operative part of the ruling granted the monks the right to practise their religious duties on the monastery’s land – which will be owned, however, by the Egyptian state and managed by the Office for the Protection of Antiquities. As a result, the monks – the vast majority of whom do not have Egyptian citizenship and whose residence there depends on residence permits (visas) renewed annually – are essentially ‘guests’, which endangers the functioning of the monastery after 15 centuries of continuous operation.

    In view of the fact that the EU and Egypt have signed an agreement on macro-financial assistance under specific conditions, including respect for human rights, which includes the protection of freedom of religion and religious minorities, can the Commission say:

    Is it aware of this ruling by the Egyptian court, and what will it do to ensure the unhindered operation and the survival of the Holy Monastery of Sinai?

    Submitted: 1.6.2025

    Last updated: 10 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Housing crisis in Greece – E-002166/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002166/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Afroditi Latinopoulou (PfE)

    Greece is currently facing a profound housing crisis, which is not an isolated phenomenon but a symptom of broader systemic deregulation in the European Union. Thousands of citizens are at risk of losing their homes, either due to debt or due to the uncontrolled action of foreign investment funds that buy properties en masse, exploiting economic impoverishment and the inability in law to protect primary residences. At the same time, reports in foreign media, such as BILD, provocatively present the situation in Greece as an ‘opportunity’ for citizens of the North to acquire homes for little money, at the expense of Greeks themselves.

    In view of the above:

    • 1.How does the Commission intend to support Greece and other Member States affected by housing crises, when mass acquisition of real estate by foreign funds and investment schemes – often on non-transparent terms – is leading to an unprecedented displacement of citizens from their own homes?
    • 2.Is there an intention to create a European mechanism to protect primary residences, as well as to regulate electronic auctions so that they do not develop into a tool for the redistribution of property in favour of external interests?
    • 3.What measures does the Commission intend to put in place to control the inflow of non-European capital and offshore schemes in the real estate sector of European countries, especially on the periphery?

    Submitted: 29.5.2025

    Last updated: 10 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Supply of high-purity vacuum salt for European industry – P-002226/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Priority question for written answer  P-002226/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Andreas Glück (Renew)

    High-purity vacuum salt (NaCl) is a strategically important raw material for the production of chlorine and caustic soda, and is therefore key to the manufacturing of a large number of essential products. These include plastics, pharmaceuticals, herbicides and disinfectants. While the vast majority of high-purity vacuum salt used by European industry is sourced in the EU, the low number of producers and high market-entry barriers have led to rapid price increases for high-purity vacuum salt over the last couple of years.

    • 1.Is the Commission aware of structural weaknesses in the single market regarding the production of strategically relevant raw materials, specifically high-purity vacuum salt?
    • 2.Is the Commission considering measures to ensure security of supply for strategically relevant raw materials that are not on the EU’s list of critical raw materials?
    • 3.Is the Commission considering placing high-purity vacuum salt on the EU’s list of critical raw materials?

    Submitted: 3.6.2025

    Last updated: 10 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – The effect of the sanctions imposed by the United States on the functioning of the ICC – P-002270/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Priority question for written answer  P-002270/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Alex Agius Saliba (S&D)

    On 15 May 2025, we read[1] that staffers of the International Criminal Court (ICC) were no longer able to perform their duties due to the sanctions imposed by the Trump administration. According to this report, one effect of the sanctions imposed on the chief prosecutor, Karim Khan, is that he has lost access to his Microsoft email address.

    Trump’s executive order threatens any person, institution or company with fines and prison time if they provide Khan with ‘financial, material, or technological support’. That is why we want to raise several questions in relation to the digital sabotage targeted at an international organisation based in the EU.

    • 1.Has the Commission undertaken action concerning these sanctions against a representative acting in their official capacity, to protect the functioning of the international rule of law, at diplomatic level as well as with representatives of Microsoft?
    • 2.What is the legal assessment of the actions undertaken by Microsoft to digitally undermine the ICC and its chief prosecutor and are there measures possible under the EU acquis to force Microsoft to resume their services?
    • 3.How does the Commission assess the risks to other European and international entities, public and private, of falling victim to this example where a US company withdraws essential digital services if they go against the Trump administration?

    Submitted: 5.6.2025

    • [1] https://www.euronews.com/2025/05/15/trumps-sanctions-on-icc-halt-tribunals-work-staffers-claim.
    Last updated: 10 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – EU’s military fuel infrastructure – E-002024/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002024/2025/rev.1
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Bart Groothuis (Renew)

    With the rise in geopolitical tensions and European armed forces’ clear dependence on civilian fuel systems, the shrinking capacity to store and refine fossil fuels in Europe could threaten military readiness. This problem is made worse by the lack of a clear strategy, contingency planning, regulatory barriers that restrict the modernisation of infrastructure, and limited coordination between the civilian and military sectors. Following a report by The Hague Centre for Strategic Studies (HCSS),[1] there are doubts regarding how Mr Kubilius, the Commissioner for Defence and Space, plans to align an increasingly electrified civilian infrastructure with military fuel needs in order to ensure military readiness.

    • 1.Does the Commission agree with the findings of the HCSS report and support its recommendations?
    • 2.Has NATO ever asked the Commission to develop a liquid fuels strategy and, if so, when can we expect the Commission to present such a strategy?
    • 3.Has NATO asked the Commission to improve its military fuel infrastructure and, if so, what concrete steps did the Commission take to meet these demands?

    Submitted: 21.5.2025

    • [1] https://hcss.nl/report/securing-european-military-fuels-in-a-tense-security-environment-supply-distribution-and-storage/.
    Last updated: 10 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Simplifying Regulation (EU) 2023/1115 on deforestation – E-002176/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002176/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Letizia Moratti (PPE), Fulvio Martusciello (PPE), Flavio Tosi (PPE), Massimiliano Salini (PPE), Salvatore De Meo (PPE), Giusi Princi (PPE)

    The Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) lays down uniform requirements for sectors that are anything but, disregarding the fact that it covers industries and traceability systems which are, along with the producer countries’ processes and risk levels, very diverse indeed.

    The EUDR’s scope, the complexity of its requirements and the inadequacy of its interpretative guidelines have resulted in a disproportionate and very burdensome law – particularly for SMEs – a state of affairs that is at odds with the Commission’s aim of simplifying red tape and cutting it by 25-35 %.

    In addition, the Deforestation Regulation adopts a punitive and proscriptive approach that could harm operators while failing to meaningfully address the root causes of deforestation.

    In the light of the above:

    • 1.Has the Commission assessed the economic and social impact of grouping very diverse sectors in the same regulation, and is it truly aware of the extent to which increasing red tape can jeopardise European supply chains?
    • 2.Given the above, as well as the fact that the EUDR’s guidelines have only added to the confusion, will the Commission postpone the regulation’s entry into force so that it can systematically revise it, potentially as part of a future omnibus package?
    • 3.Instead of simply banning market access without providing any cooperation tools worthy of the name, does the Commission not think that it would be preferable to adopt a proactive, rewards-based approach that incentivises sustainable practices, certified reforestation programmes, voluntary agreements and partnerships with producer countries?

    Submitted: 30.5.2025

    Last updated: 10 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Use of slurry solids as bedding in dairy stalls – E-002168/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002168/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Lena Düpont (PPE)

    A fundamental objective of our EU agriculture is to become more sustainable and also more efficient. Our farmers work innovatively and in line with the latest standards. One of these methods is slurry separation. By separating slurry, nutrients can be deployed even more precisely and efficiently, while the solids can also be used in a variety of sustainable ways. One possible use of solids is as bedding in dairy stalls. However, Regulations (EC) No 1069/2009 and (EU) No 142/2011 do not, as of yet, explicitly provide for the use of slurry or slurry products, such as slurry solids, as bedding in dairy stalls.

    • 1.Do the above-mentioned regulations provide for the possibility of applying for a derogation for the use of slurry and slurry products such as slurry solids as bedding in dairy stalls?
    • 2.Is the Commission aware of Member States where slurry and slurry products, such as slurry solids, are used as bedding in dairy stalls?
    • 3.Does the Commission intend to amend the above-mentioned regulations in order to allow, in principle and explicitly, the use of slurry and slurry products, such as slurry solids, as bedding in dairy stalls?

    Submitted: 29.5.2025

    Last updated: 10 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Depleted uranium in Sardinia – E-000741/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    1. Maximum levels (MLs) for lead and cadmium in food were established by Commission Regulation (EU) 2023/915[1] and for feed by Directive 2002/32/EC[2]. Only food and feed compliant with the MLs can be placed on the market guaranteeing a high level of human and animal health protection.

    Without information on the levels of thorium in feed and food in the concerned area, no assessment of the possible risk for animal or public health can be done.

    2. The Commission is aware of the potential health implications arising from environmental pollution and emphasises the importance of ensuring compliance with EU legislation that aims to protect public health. However, safeguarding public health is primarily the responsibility of Member States including the investigation of potential disease clusters.

    3. If the pollution is the result of a serious breach of EU environmental law, then the conduct might be framed as an environmental crime under the Environmental Crime Directive[3]. If the liable operator is identified and the contamination fulfils the criteria of environmental damage under the Environmental Liability Directive[4], the operator shall be required to remedy the damage to the environment.

    Salto di Quirra is located in air quality zone IT2010 Zona Rurale according to Ambient Air Quality Directive 2008/50/EC[5], with the closest sampling point in Nuraminis. The latest data for this zone for 2022 and 2023 does not indicate the exceedance of any air quality standard[6].

    Based on the information from the European Industrial Emissions Portal[7], no industrial installation covered by the industrial emissions directive was identified in the area.

    • [1] Commission Regulation (EU) 2023/915 of 25 April 2023 on maximum levels for certain contaminants in food and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 OJ L 119, 5.5.2023, p. 103-157
      ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/915/oj.
    • [2] Directive 2002/32/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 May 2002 on undesirable substances in animal feed OJ L 140, 30.5.2002, p. 10-22 ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2002/32/oj.
    • [3] Directive 2008/99/EC on the protection of the environment through criminal law OJ L 328, 6.12.2008, p. 28-37, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2008/99/oj, replaced by Directive (EU) 2024/1203 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 April 2024 on the protection of the environment through criminal law and replacing Directives 2008/99/EC and 2009/123/EC, OJ L, 2024/1203, 30.4.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2024/1203/oj, in force and to be transposed by Member States by 21 May 2026.
    • [4] Directive 2004/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on environmental liability with regard to the prevention and remedying of environmental damage, OJ L 143, 30.4.2004, p. 56-75. ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2004/35/oj.
    • [5] Directive 2008/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2008 on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe OJ L 152, 11.6.2008, p. 1-44 ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2008/50/oj.
    • [6] The Italian authorities are reporting information of the following pollutants in this zone: arsenic, benzene, benzo(a)pyrene, cadmium, carbon monoxide, lead, nickel, nitrogen dioxide, particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) and sulphur dioxide, https://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/it/eu/aqd/g/.
    • [7] https://industry.eea.europa.eu/.
    Last updated: 10 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Support for farmers affected by low temperatures in March 2025 – E-001579/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    Under the common market Organisation Regulation[1] the Commission may adopt exceptional measures financed by the agricultural reserve and may provide emergency support to farmers negatively affected by extreme adverse weather events and natural disasters as it recently did for producers in Spain, Croatia, Cyprus, Latvia and Hungary[2].

    This exceptional measure followed a request for support from the five Member States and was designed following an assessment of the situation and of its exceptional nature by the Commission services, based inter alia on the available information and data on actual damages and losses per sector provided by the relevant Member States.

    The Commission has not received information from Romania on damages due to frost events that occurred in March 2025.

    • [1] http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2013/1308/oj.
    • [2] http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_impl/2025/441/oj.
    Last updated: 10 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Updating of designations of wine grape varieties with reference to origin – E-001573/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission is aware that climate change can modify growing conditions and favour a geographical shift of certain varieties more adapted to forthcoming climatic conditions.

    According to Article 81 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013[1], it is for Member States to classify the wine grape varieties that may be used on their territories for wine production. Furthermore, grape varieties that can be used in each Geographical Indication (GI) are an element of the GI product specification.

    Product specifications can be modified and adapted to the specific production needs of each GI, in accordance to Article 24 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1143[2].

    A change of grape varieties is possible and can be made through a ‘standard amendment’ to the product specification, subject to a national procedure followed by notification to the Commission, as provided for in particular by Articles 24(4) of Regulation (EU) 2024/1143, 4 and 5 of Regulation (EU) 2025/27[3] and 12 of Regulation (EU) 2025/26[4].

    The Commission is not planning changes to Annex IV, Part B of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/33[5] considering the sensitivity of this labelling issue.

    This Annex was the result of a compromise reached after a long debate in the context of the recast of EU labelling rules resulting in Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/33.

    While Article 50 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/33 does not allow the use of the name of the varieties Barbera or Sangiovese on the label of wines with GI in Germany, it does not preclude the use of those varieties and others to produce wine, provided that those varieties are listed in the national classification of varieties and, in the case of GIs, are set out in the product specification of the relevant protected GI.

    • [1] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2013/1308/oj/eng.
    • [2] http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1143/oj.
    • [3] http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2025/27/oj.
    • [4] http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_impl/2025/26/oj.
    • [5] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2019/33/oj/eng.
    Last updated: 10 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Joint efforts to prevent and combat different forms of hatred against traditional national and linguistic minorities – E-001599/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The respect for minority rights is enshrined in Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union[1]. Article 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union[2] prohibits any discrimination including on grounds of ethnic or social origin, language or membership of a national minority.

    The Commission is committed to ensure that there is no place for hate[3] in the EU. The 2008 Framework Decision on combating racism and xenophobia[4] requires Member States to criminalise public incitement to violence or hatred based on race, colour, religion, descent, or national or ethnic origin, when directed against a group of persons or a member of such group.

    National authorities, including national courts, remain competent to determine whether a specific behaviour or act qualifies as hate speech or hate crime under applicable national law.

    The High Level Group on combating hate speech and hate crime[5], which is in place since 2016, has contributed to develop widely used standards and guidance to support national authorities in their responses to hate crime and hate speech and the effective enforcement of national laws on the ground.

    The High Level Group will maintain a comprehensive approach on all forms of hate speech and hate crime, in particular focusing on the grounds listed in the framework Decision, including ethnicity or nationality.

    Enhancing the protection of individuals and groups at risk of hate victimisation based on these grounds may also bring protection for groups speaking minority languages, as relevant in specific national contexts.

    • [1] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A12012E%2FTXT.
    • [2] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:12012P/TXT.
    • [3] Joint Communication to the European Parliament and the Council JOIN/2023/51 final on ‘No place for hate: a Europe united against hatred’ JOIN/2023/51 final.
    • [4] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32008F0913.
    • [5] https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/policies/justice-and-fundamental-rights/combatting-discrimination/racism-and-xenophobia/combating-hate-speech-and-hate-crime_en.
    Last updated: 10 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – European drone capabilities and defence autonomy: steps to reduce dependency on China and foster innovation in drone- and counter-drone systems – E-000668/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission is actively working to reduce dependency on Chinese drone components by promoting diversification of supply chains and supporting EU industrial capacities.

    To this end, the European Defence Fund provides funding for collaborative projects in drone and counter-drone technologies. The EU’s foreign direct investment screening framework helps identifying and mitigating risks associated with third-country dependencies.

    The EU Drone Strategy 2.0[1] contributes to the objectives of the ‘Action plan on synergies between civil, defence and space industries’, exploring synergies between the civil and defence drone industries, including counter-drone technologies.

    The Drone Strategy includes measures to support research related to drones and innovation with dual-use potential, sets up an EU network on civil-defence drone testing centres, promotes alignment of certification requirements for civil and military drone applications, and supports the adoption of EU counter-drone package.

    Moreover, in the White Paper and Rearm Europe Plan published[2] 19 March 2025 the Commission has recognised drones and counter-drones systems as one of the critical capability shortfalls and is committed to support Member States actions aimed at reducing dependencies.

    The EU counter-drone communication[3], adopted in October 2023, aims to address the terrorist threat possibly posed by non-cooperative drones. It identified 18 key actions aiming at drawing up a fully-fledged EU counter-drone policy, which are being implemented.

    • [1] https://transport.ec.europa.eu/document/download/1cb5fb4f-4252-4f97-abf4-c4a167b1c7d2_en?filename=COM_2022_652_drone_strategy_2.0.pdf.
    • [2] https://defence-industry-space.ec.europa.eu/eu-defence-industry/introducing-white-paper-european-defence-and-rearm-europe-plan-readiness-2030_en.
    • [3] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52023DC0659.
    Last updated: 10 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Scientific basis for designation of mineral soil as peat soil under GAEC 2 – E-001438/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    In 2022 and 2023, the Commission’s Joint Research Centre provided technical information to assist Member States with the mapping of peatland and wetland as part of a project entitled ‘Satellite based mapping and monitoring of European peatland and wetland for LULUCF[1] and agriculture’ (SEPLA).

    This notwithstanding , defining the territorial scope of the Good Agricultural and Environmental Condition Standard for the protection of wetland and peatland (GAEC 2) within the context of Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Strategic Plans lies primarily with the Member States.

    The Commission services assess whether the scope proposed by the Member States aligns with the standard’s core objective, as set out in Article 109(2)(a)(i) of Regulation (EU) 2021/2115[2].

    It is for the Member States to carry out the relevant mapping and to decide to publish the scientific data, methodology and potential resulting restrictions imposed on farming activity underpinning its chosen approach.

    • [1] Land use, land-use change and forestry Regulation — https://climate.ec.europa.eu/eu-action/land-use-sector_en.
    • [2] http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2021/2115/oj.
    Last updated: 10 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Urgent activation of the EU Blocking Statute, as requested by Parliament in its 2024 annual report on human rights and democracy in the world – E-002163/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002163/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Rima Hassan (The Left), Manon Aubry (The Left), Mounir Satouri (Verts/ALE), Carola Rackete (The Left), Abir Al-Sahlani (Renew), Ana Miranda Paz (Verts/ALE), Leila Chaibi (The Left), Marc Botenga (The Left), Irene Montero (The Left), Rudi Kennes (The Left), Özlem Demirel (The Left), Thijs Reuten (S&D), Arash Saeidi (The Left), Damien Carême (The Left), Marina Mesure (The Left), Cecilia Strada (S&D), Hanna Gedin (The Left), Li Andersson (The Left), Maria Walsh (PPE), Diana Riba i Giner (Verts/ALE), Lucia Yar (Renew), Sirpa Pietikäinen (PPE)

    On 6 February 2025, US President Donald Trump signed an executive order imposing sanctions on the International Criminal Court (ICC). The broad and ambiguous scope of these sanctions seriously undermines the ICC’s ability to deliver on its mandate to end impunity for the most serious crimes of international concern. Asset freezes and targeted sanctions against ICC staff have a chilling effect on companies and civil society organisations that might otherwise engage with the ICC.

    At a time when victims of international law violations are growing in number – in Ukraine, Palestine, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Sudan – these sanctions obstruct access to justice for all those affected by crimes within the ICC’s jurisdiction. Yet the EU has a legal instrument to counter such extraterritorial measures: the EU Blocking Statute, designed to neutralise the effects of sanctions imposed by non-EU countries.

    In its 2024 annual report on human rights and democracy in the world[1], Parliament called on the Commission to ‘urgently activate the Blocking Statute’.

    • 1.What concrete steps has the Commission taken to respond to this request?
    • 2.Has the Commission assessed the impact of these sanctions on the Member States and on European actors cooperating with the ICC?

    Submitted: 28.5.2025

    • [1] Texts adopted, P10_TA(2025)0059.

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Need for strategies to promote local food production and agriculture – P-002223/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Priority question for written answer  P-002223/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Rosa Serrano Sierra (S&D)

    Rural communities in the European Union manage natural resources, mitigate climate change and ensure our food production and security of supply. Our regions are drivers of progress, but they face serious and permanent challenges, such as depopulation, the price crisis in the agricultural sector or generational renewal. This is why the European Commission recognises the importance of supporting EU farming communities.

    Despite this, some regional authorities prioritise the economic criterion in the public procurement of food services – such as in the kitchen canteens – without taking into account proximity or sustainability criteria. In doing so, they act to the detriment of small-scale economies that favour more environmentally and community-friendly local production.

    Bearing in mind that the European Commission confirms in its ‘vision for the future of agriculture and food production’ that a fair and competitive food system must be created with affordable and sustainable food for all, I would like to ask the following questions:

    • 1.Does the Commission consider it important to promote local food production and agriculture?
    • 2.Does the Commission believe that sustainability, seasonality of products and health criteria should be taken into account in public procurement?

    Submitted: 3.6.2025

    Last updated: 10 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Expediting gender equality in Romania through improving its score on the Gender Equality Index – E-002179/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002179/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Gabriela Firea (S&D)

    The Gender Equality Index is measured on a scale of 1 to 100 at European Union level. It assesses gender gaps, over a given period of time, in areas such as knowledge, work, money, time, power, health and violence.

    Sadly, Romania ranks last in the EU in terms of gender equality, with an index of 57.5 according to the EIGE’s 2024 report. The gender gaps in Romania are most pronounced in the areas of power (32.8 points), violence (36.5 points) and knowledge (55.4 points), out of a total of 100 points.

    In this context:

    • 1.What concrete measures does the Commission intend to take to support Romania in improving gender equality?
    • 2.Which specific funds or programmes can be used by Member States with a low index to expedite gender equality solutions?

    Submitted: 30.5.2025

    Last updated: 10 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Highlights – Exchange of views with Ioannis Tsakiris, Vice-President of the EIB – Special committee on the Housing Crisis in the European Union

    Source: European Parliament

    On 16 June, HOUS Members will hold an exchange of views with Ioannis Tsakiris, Vice-President of the European Investment Bank (EIB).

    Vice-President Tsakiris will provide an overview of the recently approved EIB housing action plan.

    The meeting will also offer insight into selected projects to showcase how the EIB is assisting cities, regions and the construction sector in the development and renovation of affordable and energy efficient housing solutions.

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – The need to strengthen the role of the new cohesion policy in deep renovations, energy upgrading of housing and affordable housing – E-002173/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002173/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Elena Kountoura (The Left)

    Buildings account for approximately 40 % of total energy consumption in the EU and 36 % of CO₂ emissions, making them a key driver of climate change.[1] Decarbonising the building stock through deep renovations is essential to achieving the EU’s climate goals.[2] However, despite the establishment of European policies,[3] the social dimension of environmental policy has not yet been sufficiently integrated.[4] The lack of binding social clauses in European cohesion policy funding programmes increases the risk of phenomena such as ‘green gentrification’ or ‘state-subsidised eviction by renovation’ (‘renoviction’), where renovations lead to rent increases and the displacement of vulnerable groups.[5]

    Considering that an estimated 800 000 social housing units require renovation each year, while around 1.5 million new homes are needed annually:[6]

    • 1.How will the Commission ensure that the ‘renovation wave’ is incorporated into cohesion policy through stable and adequately funded programmes after 2027 for the deep renovation of social housing, tackling energy poverty and prioritising the renovation of empty buildings for sustainable social and affordable housing?
    • 2.Will the Commission consider establishing a European Renovation Loan[7] to cover capital needs towards a net-zero emissions building stock by 2050?
    • 3.Does the Commission intend to propose the inclusion of social clauses for green public renovation investments from cohesion funds, in order to prevent rent increases and social exclusion following renovations?

    Submitted: 30.5.2025

    • [1] See https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52021PC0802
    • [2] Energy retrofitting of housing reduces carbon emissions, improves people’s quality of life, reduces energy poverty and makes housing more affordable and resilient to energy price fluctuations.
    • [3] For information on the financial instruments provided by the European Union and the EIB, see https://energy.ec.europa.eu/topics/energy-efficiency/financing/financing-building-renovations_en
    • [4] See the report by Enrico Letta, ‘Much More than a Market’, April 2024.
    • [5] Increasing housing costs exacerbate energy poverty and social exclusion, especially in Southern Europe, where the existing housing stock is old.
    • [6] The EIB calculates that EUR 270 billion in investment is needed annually to meet these needs.
    • [7] See https://www.climatestrategy.com/en/informe_23.php and https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2023-0068_EN.pdf.
    Last updated: 10 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Closure of the Monastery of St Catherine in Sinai and violation of religious freedoms by the Egyptian authorities – E-002164/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002164/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Afroditi Latinopoulou (PfE)

    According to recent reports, the Egyptian authorities have obtained a court ruling that provides for the suspension of the operation of the historic Monastery of St Catherine in Sinai, the confiscation of its property and the removal of the monks. The Monastery in question, which was founded in the 6th century by the Emperor Justinian, is the oldest functioning Christian monastery in the world and is globally recognised as a place of significant cultural and religious heritage.

    This ruling contradicts the public commitments of the Egyptian President to the Greek Government, while raising serious questions regarding the protection of religious freedom, cultural heritage and the rights of the monks who have resided there for centuries.

    Given the EU’s close relations with Egypt and the fundamental values that the Union upholds:

    • 1.How does the Commission intend to react to this blatant violation of religious freedom and the property rights of the monks of the Monastery of St Catherine?
    • 2.Does the Commission intend to raise the issue in EU-Egypt political dialogue and demand the lifting of the restrictive measures on the Monastery?
    • 3.What actions, including financial and/or political sanctions, does the Commission intend to take to protect the Monastery’s cultural heritage and prevent it from being turned into a tourist attraction, against the will of the religious community?

    Submitted: 29.5.2025

    Last updated: 10 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Challenges and gaps in the Commission proposal for European funding for affordable housing from cohesion policy funds – E-002174/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002174/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Elena Kountoura (The Left)

    According to a recent opinion from the European Court of Auditors,[1] the Commission proposal in the context of the mid-term review of cohesion policy,[2] which allows for the financing of investments in ‘affordable housing’ through cohesion funds, has gaps and carries the risk that the support will mainly benefit property owners, without hitting its real social target. While recognising the widespread lack of and urgent need to support affordable housing in the Member States, the proposal: a) is not accompanied by any definition of ‘affordable housing’, b) does not clearly define the types of eligible housing or the target social groups, c) is not based on any gap analysis to demonstrate where European intervention is most needed, and d) does not clarify how this expenditure will contribute in practice to improving the functioning of national housing markets.

    In view of the above:

    • 1.Does the Commission intend to propose a clear, commonly accepted definition of ‘affordable housing’ for the purposes of cohesion policy and to specify the types of housing that can be considered eligible for funding, as well as the social groups it seeks to benefit?
    • 2.Does the Commission intend to carry out a gap analysis at Union level on affordable housing, in order to guide targeted interventions in the Member States?
    • 3.What measures does the Commission intend to take to ensure that the funds are truly socially targeted and to avoid European support becoming an indirect tool for profiteering?

    Submitted: 30.5.2025

    • [1] Opinion 02/2025 (pursuant to Article 322, TFEU) concerning the proposal 2025/0084 (COD) for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) 2021/1058 and (EU) 2021/1056 as regards specific measures to address strategic challenges in the context of the midterm review and the proposal 2025/0085 (COD) for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1057 establishing the European Social Fund + (ESF+) as regards specific measures to address strategic challenges, https://www.eca.europa.eu/el/publications/op-2025-02.
    • [2] A modernised Cohesion Policy: The mid-term review, https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/communication/mid-term-review-2025/communication-mid-term-review-2025_en.pdf.
    Last updated: 10 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Harmonisation of post-exposure HIV treatment timeframes – P-002268/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Priority question for written answer  P-002268/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Vytenis Povilas Andriukaitis (S&D)

    Post-exposure HIV treatment offers a therapeutic option to people who have been exposed to a sexual risk of HIV infection, sometimes as a result of sexual violence or rape.

    Often, people in such situations experience denial and considerable guilt. They do not always find it possible to take post-exposure HIV treatment in countries that have set the maximum post-exposure timeframes for taking this medication at 36 or 48 hours.

    In this context, EU countries offer different timeframes for accessing post-exposure HIV treatment, leading to disparities for their citizens. The maximum required timeframe for EU citizens to benefit from post-exposure treatment can differ from 36 to 72 hours.

    Given that HIV knows no borders and Europeans are increasingly moving throughout the continent, is it possible to promote EU-level harmonisation of the timeframe for accessing post-exposure HIV treatment, with a view to extending it to up to 72 hours after a potential sexual exposure?

    Submitted: 5.6.2025

    Last updated: 10 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Strengthening the role of local authorities in addressing the housing crisis in the European Union – E-002175/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002175/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Elena Kountoura (The Left)

    The housing crisis is affecting more and more regions in the EU, with particular intensity in urban centres, islands and remote areas. Local authorities are on the front line of the crisis, facing diverse and often unique challenges, which require solutions tailored to specific local needs. Their active participation is therefore essential for the development and implementation of national housing strategies and for the effective implementation of EU policies. However, access to European financial instruments for local authorities, especially small municipalities, remains limited.[1] To strengthen their capacity to implement housing programmes, there is a need to create specific European programmes and fast-track funding mechanisms for sustainable social and affordable housing, to allocate part of cohesion policy funds directly to local authorities in a targeted manner and to provide technical assistance to mature housing projects, in particular in municipalities without technical capacity.

    In view of the above:

    • 1.Does the Commission intend to strengthen the institutional participation of local authorities, including island and small municipalities, in the design and implementation of housing policies under cohesion policy after 2027?
    • 2.Does the Commission intend to establish specific mechanisms for direct and rapid financing of municipalities for social and affordable housing projects from cohesion policy funds?
    • 3.Does the Commission intend to support the creation of public funding intermediaries and the provision of technical assistance for the implementation of housing projects by municipalities with limited technical capacity?

    Submitted: 30.5.2025

    • [1] The existing European Union financial instruments that can be mobilised to support social and affordable housing initiatives are not sufficiently accessible or adapted to the needs of local and regional authorities. The complexity of application procedures, the lack of technical support and the inadequate direct allocation mechanisms often act as structural barriers for cities and municipalities wishing to access such funds.
    Last updated: 10 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – ‘Resilience Tax’ – E-002183/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002183/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Yannis Maniatis (S&D)

    The tourism industry, whose contribution in Greece exceeds 30 % of national GDP, certainly also has negative impacts on local communities, leading to environmental degradation, traffic congestion and a general burden on local infrastructure. To address these negative impacts, many European countries have adopted bespoke local ‘accommodation taxes’ with remunerative features. The aim is to address issues and improve the operation of the tourism sector at the local level (cleanliness, infrastructure maintenance, tourist promotion, etc.).

    Unfortunately, Greece recently renamed the ‘accommodation tax’ the ‘resilience tax’, increased its revenues by up to 700 % and legislated for the management of these hundreds of millions by central government. The revenue is supposed to finance climate change and disaster recovery actions, despite the fact that all such actions are provided for from other sources, such as, for example, the Recovery and Resilience Fund. Thus, local authorities are left to face their daily problems without help and without their own resources.

    In view of this:

    • 1.Is the Greek model compatible with best practices in terms of reciprocity for the financial support of local governments?
    • 2.What European tools can the Government use to finance climate and disaster actions, to take the place of the revenue from the ‘resilience tax’ and leave that with the municipalities?

    Submitted: 1.6.2025

    Last updated: 10 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – The need to exclude social and affordable housing investments from Member States’ deficit calculations and review State aid rules – E-002170/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002170/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Elena Kountoura (The Left)

    The housing crisis in the European Union is getting worse all the time, with house purchase and rental prices skyrocketing,[1] making decent housing unaffordable for more and more households, especially low- and middle-income ones. Housing costs absorb most of citizens’ disposable income, reinforcing social inequalities and widening the exclusion gap. Furthermore, the existing State aid framework and the strict fiscal constraints of the Stability and Growth Pact act as disincentives for critical public investments in social infrastructure, such as affordable and social housing, depriving Member States of the possibility of substantial interventions.[2]

    In practice, the current definition of ‘social housing’ in the 2012 Services of General Economic Interest (SGEI) Decision remains restrictive, creating legal and practical uncertainties in Member States and limiting the effective use of Community financial instruments for affordable housing projects, such as the European Regional Development Fund.[3]

    In view of the above:

    • 1.Does the Commission intend to propose the immediate exclusion of public investment in sustainable social and affordable housing from the calculation of Member States’ deficits under the Stability Pact and the European Semester?
    • 2.Is the Commission aiming to revise the 2012 SGEI Decision to include a European definition of affordable housing?
    • 3.What initiatives does the Commission intend to put in place to remove existing obstacles preventing public investment in affordable housing[4] through the European Structural Funds and the EIB?

    Submitted: 30.5.2025

    • [1] Between 2015 and 2023, house prices in the Union increased by an average of 48 %.
    • [2] The strict application of fiscal rules prevents Member States from making long-term, sustainable investments in public, non-profit or cooperative housing.
    • [3] Although social housing is generally recognised as a social service of general interest, many Member States consider the provision of housing to vulnerable citizens to be an economic activity. In these cases, social housing is classified as an SGEI and is subject to EU internal market and competition rules. If a Member State defines social housing in accordance with the 2012 SGEI Decision, it is exempted from the obligation to notify the Commission in advance and is not subject to strict State aid control. This does not apply to affordable housing.
    • [4] E.g. regarding compensation for the provision of services of general economic interest at an annual amount exceeding EUR 15 million.
    Last updated: 10 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –