Category: DJF

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Ensuring comprehensive value chain emissions reporting through the prompt adoption of CountEmissions EU – P-002356/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    1. Since December 2024, after both co-legislators had adopted and the European Parliament confirmed their positions on the file, the Commission has urged the trilogues to start. Denmark recently confirmed that it will take up the CountEmissionsEU file under its Presidency. A swift start of the trilogue negotiations is underway and the date for the opening trilogue meeting is already agreed.

    2. The Commission is ready to support and facilitate the discussions between the co- legislators to achieve a timely adoption of the CountEmissions EU regulation. If the adoption were to be significantly delayed, the objectives of the Commission proposal to harmonise the calculation of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of transport services to enable customers to choose more sustainable transport options while encouraging the uptake of GHG accounting by businesses, and thereby to contribute to the overall EU’s climate objectives, would be further pushed back. Lack of a unified EU framework would also mean continued use of divergent methods across operators, reducing comparability and interoperability and creating extra burdens to industry. Green transport solutions might not be rewarded properly in the market due to possible greenwashing and consumer mistrust in published information.

    Last updated: 16 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Long-term support for Ukraine and the country’s path towards European integration – E-002008/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The EU has consistently supported a comprehensive, just and lasting peace in Ukraine, grounded in the international law. It joined Ukraine and international partners, including the United States, in calling for a full, unconditional ceasefire of 30 days, as a vital step to reduce civilian suffering and to allow space for meaningful talks on genuine peace, aimed at ending Russia’s war of aggression[1]. Russia has so far not shown willingness to engage in real negotiations and continues to escalate its systematic campaign of air attacks against Ukrainian civilian infrastructure and civilians[2].

    Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, including its repercussions for European and global security, constitutes an existential challenge for the EU[3]. Thus, Europe is ready to boost its defence spending, including also to support Ukraine[4]. The EU is helping Ukraine to defend itself through the delivery of military support and deepening cooperation and integration between the EU’s and Ukraine’s defence industry.

    The EU will continue to work closely with Ukraine to support its reform efforts on its European path[5]. Through the EUR 50 billion Ukraine Facility, the EU provides stable and predictable assistance for the 2024-2027 period, supporting Ukraine’s financing needs and reconstruction, mobilising investments and promoting reforms necessary for EU accession. The EU continues to deliver on its EUR 18.1 billion contribution under the Extraordinary Revenue Acceleration loans to Ukraine.

    • [1] Statement by the High Representative/Vice-President (HR/VP) on behalf of the European Union on call for ceasefire, 10 May 2025: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2025/05/10/ukrainerussia-statement-by-the-high-representative-on-behalf-of-the-european-union-on-call-for-ceasefire/.
    • [2] Statement by the President of the Commission with HR/VP on the 18th package of sanctions against Russia: https://www.eeas.europa.eu/delegations/ukraine/statement-president-von-der-leyen-hrvp-kallas-18th-package-sanctions-against-russia_en?s=232; Foreign Affairs Council: press remarks by (HR/VP) after the informal videoconference meeting: https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/foreign-affairs-council-press-remarks-high-representative-kaja-kallas-after-informal-videoconference_en.
    • [3] European Council conclusions on European defence, 6 March 2025: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2025/03/06/european-council-conclusions-on-european-defence/.
    • [4] Press statement by President von der Leyen on the defence package of 4 March 2025: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/statement_25_673.
    • [5] European Council conclusion, 19 December 2024: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/jhlenhaj/euco-conclusions-19122024-en.pdf.
    Last updated: 16 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Cooperation between the Greek Government and the European institutions on transparency in the allocation of European agricultural subsidies – E-002154/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    1. Due to deficiencies identified in the compliance of the paying agency OPEKEPE with the accreditation criteria[1], the competent authority put the paying agency’s accreditation under probation for a period of 12 months starting from 10 September 2024 and prepared an action plan aiming to remedy those deficiencies. The Commission is closely monitoring the implementation of this action plan through the analysis of the periodical reports sent by the Greek authorities, and visits to said authorities, when necessary. According to the timeline, all remedial actions should be completed by the 12 September 2025. The Commission cannot comment further on ongoing audits.

    2. The Commission is working closely with the Greek authorities to ensure full and timely implementation of the action plan, also considering the possible impact of the announced modification of OPEKEPE’s competences. The action plan covered the organisational structure of the OPEKEPE and the Commission expected remedial actions in this regard. To date, the Commission has not received official notifications of the decisions regarding the paying agency or the role of the Independent Authority for Public Revenue (IAPR) in this context, as the legal framework for the modification is still in preparation.

    • [1] Listed in Annex I to Regulation (EU) 2022/127.
    Last updated: 16 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Update on the situation of tax judges in Italy – E-002232/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission refers the Honourable Member to its previous reply to Question E-002441/2024 regarding the situation of tax judges in Italy, which was transmitted to the European Parliament on 8 January 2025.

    In that reply, the Commission informed the Honourable Member that, following a preliminary examination of the compatibility of the relevant national provisions with Clause 4 of the framework Agreement on part-time work annexed to Directive 97/81/EC[1], Article 7 of Directive 2003/88/EC[2] concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time, and Directive 92/85/EEC[3] on the safety and health of pregnant workers, it had decided to initiate an informal exchange with the Italian authorities concerning possible infringements of the aforementioned legal instruments.

    The Commission is currently analysing the observations provided by the Italian authorities. Upon completion of this assessment, and in light of the outcome of the informal dialogue, the Commission may determine whether the conditions are met to initiate formal infringement proceedings for a possible breach of EU law.

    • [1] Council Directive 97/81/EC of 15 December 1997 concerning the framework Agreement on part-time work concluded by UNICE, CEEP and the ETUC — https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/1997/81/oj/eng.
    • [2] Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time — https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2003/88/oj/eng.
    • [3] Council Directive 92/85/EEC of 19 October 1992 on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health at work of pregnant workers and workers who have recently given birth or are breastfeeding — https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/1992/85/oj/eng.
    Last updated: 16 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Effect of the emissions trading system on the attractiveness of the outermost regions for air and sea transport – the case of Guadeloupe – E-001915/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission is aware of the permanent constraints faced by the outermost regions, notably their heavy dependence on air and sea transport. This is why these regions benefit from specific conditions under the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS[1]).

    Nearly 100%[2] of all the emissions from flights to/from Guadeloupe are connected to France and therefore not priced under the ETS before 2031[3].

    Despite these flights not being subject to carbon pricing, the ETS provides a higher level of support when sustainable aviation fuels[4] are uplifted at airports in outermost regions, when 100% of the cost difference with traditional kerosene is covered.

    Similarly, until end of 2030, the ETS imposes no surrendering obligation for maritime transport emissions from voyages between a port in an outermost region and a port in the same Member State.

    The FuelEU Maritime Regulation[5] also covers only half of the voyages to/from outermost regions, and Member States can fully exempt voyages between two outermost regions until 2029.

    The Commission is carefully monitoring the implementation of the ETS and FuelEU in relation to maritime, taking due account of outermost regions.

    The first Commission report[6] does not find any evidence of major changes in the market being directly attributable to the introduction of the ETS — including for outermost regions. The Commission will continue its monitoring activities and propose, if necessary, measures to ensure the effective implementation of the ETS.

    In terms of support mechanisms, Member States are required to use all revenues generated by the ETS to tackle climate change, including in outermost regions. Several other EU instruments include favourable conditions for these regions to address their transport needs[7].

    • [1] Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC (OJ L 275, 25.10.2003, p. 32).
    • [2] Eurocontrol data indicates that, in 2024, the emissions from flights to and from Guadeloupe were 98.7% domestic.
    • [3] Flights to/from an outermost region within the same Member State are exempt, thus no additional costs stem from the application of the ETS.
    • [4] https://climate.ec.europa.eu/document/download/7eace0de-fbc8-46c5-b52c-80d50f406c58_en?filename=policy_transport_aviation_airport_100_support_en.pdf.
    • [5] Regulation (EU) 2023/1805 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 September 2023 on the use of renewable and low-carbon fuels in maritime transport, and amending Directive 2009/16/EC (OJ L 234, 22.9.2023, p. 48, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/1805/oj).
    • [6]  COM(2025) 110 final — https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52025DC0110.
    • [7] The European Regional Development Fund supports airport infrastructure and compensates for their higher operating costs. The Connecting Europe Facility supports transport infrastructure with higher co-financing rates in these regions. Moreover, several Public Service Obligations ensure connectivity with outermost regions. Social aid schemes support air transport for residents of remote regions.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Aircraft noise around Schiphol – P-002158/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    1. Regulation (EU) No 598/2014[1] (hereafter the ‘Regulation’) requires a balancing of economic and environmental interests when Member States implement noise related measures at airports. The noise situation should be regularly assessed, and Member States may implement measures including operating restrictions.

    2. The regulation refers to the method, indicators and noise information to be provided when Member States intend to implement noise-related operating restrictions. Another very important element of the process is carrying out appropriate stakeholder consultations and the cost-efficiency. All elements should allow a thorough analysis on which measures are needed to achieve the desired noise objective.

    3. On 5 March 2025, the Commission adopted its decision[2] on the notified operating restrictions for Schiphol airport, which is publicly available.

    • [1] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2014/598/oj/eng.
    • [2] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32025D0519.
    Last updated: 16 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Compensation for livestock farmers in Thessaly – Delays in payment – E-001985/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    In January 2024, EUR 101 million were granted to Greece from the EU Solidarity Fund (EUSF)[1] to cover costs[2] for emergency and recovery operations in response to the disaster caused by the storm ‘Daniel’.

    Private damage and the agricultural sector are not eligible for EUSF support. Greece needs to submit to the Commission an implementation report describing the implemented operations 24 months after the disbursement date .

    In December 2023, the Commission provided EUR 43 million emergency financial support for the agricultural sectors most impacted by wildfires and floodings which affected Greece during August and September 2023[3], from which the amount of EUR 42 591 470.10 was disbursed by 28 April 2025, based on payments made to beneficiaries within the deadline .

    It is under Member States responsibility to ensure that payments are disbursed to the beneficiaries in full and within the payment deadlines as laid down by Union law[4].

    The Commission is closely reviewing the implementation of all the measures and interventions of both the Rural Development Programme[5] and the Common Agriculture Policy Strategic Plan of Greece (CSP)[6]. Commission representatives participate in the Monitoring Committees of the above programmes in an advisory role.

    In this context, the Commission reviews the financial data, the result indicators, and the progress towards quantified target values and milestones, encouraging the authorities to concentrate their efforts and speed up the implementation of all measures .

    A broad range of activities contributing to improving the administrative capacity necessary to ensure a smooth implementation of interventions and related payments, could be supported through the technical assistance aid available within the CSP.

    • [1] Council Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002 of 11 November 2002 establishing the European Union Solidarity Fund (OJ L 311, 14.11.2002, p. 3) as amended by Regulation (EU) No 661/2014 of the European Parliament and the Council of 15 May 2014 (OJ L 189, 27.6.2014, p. 143) and by Regulation (EU) 2020/461 of the European Parliament and the Council of 30 March 2020 (OJ L 99, 31.3.2020, p. 9). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:32002R2012.
    • [2] This means, for example, the recovery of essential infrastructure, provision of temporary accommodation to the population, cleaning-up operations, and protection of the cultural heritage.
    • [3] http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_impl/2023/2820/oj.
    • [4] Article 38, Article 44 and Article 59 of Regulation (EU) 2021/2116 — http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2021/2116/oj.
    • [5] RDP 2014-2022: https://www.agrotikianaptixi.gr/paa-2014-2020/egkriseis-tropopoiiseis/.
    • [6] CAP Strategic Plan 2023-2027: https://www.agrotikianaptixi.gr/category/sskap-2023-2027/sskap-egkrisi-tropopoiiseis/.
    Last updated: 16 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Gaza: offer of EU assistance in sidelining UN humanitarian agencies and consultation with Palestinian counterparts – E-002153/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The dire humanitarian situation in Gaza is a priority for the EU. The EU has consistently called on the Israeli government to lift the blockade on the entry of humanitarian aid into Gaza[1].

    The EU reiterates that humanitarian aid must never be politicised or militarised and stressed the role of the United Nations (UN) in distributing humanitarian assistance[2].

    The EU continues to voice its urgent call for the immediate, unimpeded and sustained resumption of delivery of aid at scale, fully in line with humanitarian principles and according to the needs of the civilian population in Gaza, as expressed in a joint statement by the High Representative/Vice-President (HR/VP) with the Commissioner for the Mediterranean and the Commissioner for Equality on 7 May 2025[3] and in a joint donor statement on humanitarian aid to Gaza on 19 May 2025[4].

    A diplomatic solution is the only way forward. The EU continues to support the efforts by the mediators to reach a permanent ceasefire and hostage-release deal. The HR/VP is engaging in diplomatic efforts with all relevant actors, including the UN and regional partners, to help end the conflict in Gaza.

    Since the onset of the conflict in Gaza, the EU has deployed all available humanitarian instruments to ease the suffering of the civilian population in Gaza and the West Bank.

    The EU announced initial humanitarian funding of EUR 120 million for Gaza in 2025, and then allocated an additional EUR 50 million to address the urgent needs.

    This brings total EU humanitarian assistance since October 2023 to over EUR 500 million (EUR 103 million in 2023 and EUR 237 million in 2024).

    • [1] https://north-africa-middle-east-gulf.ec.europa.eu/news/joint-statement-high-representative-kallas-and-commissioners-suica-and-lahbib-humanitarian-situation-2025-04-12_en; https://north-africa-middle-east-gulf.ec.europa.eu/news/joint-statement-high-representative-kallas-commissioner-suica-and-commissioner-lahbib-humanitarian-2025-05-07_en; https://north-africa-middle-east-gulf.ec.europa.eu/news/read-out-phone-call-between-president-von-der-leyen-and-his-majesty-king-abdullah-ii-jordan-2025-05-27_en.
    • [2] https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/israelpalestine-statement-high-representative-occupied-palestinian-territory_en.
    • [3] https://north-africa-middle-east-gulf.ec.europa.eu/news/joint-statement-high-representative-kallas-commissioner-suica-and-commissioner-lahbib-humanitarian-2025-05-07_en.
    • [4] https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/joint-donor-statement-humanitarian-aid-gaza%C2%A0_en.
    Last updated: 16 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Cancellation of VPAs and replacement by Forest Partnerships – E-001647/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission proposal for termination of the Voluntary Partnership Agreement (VPA) with Liberia is based on a decade of dialogue and close monitoring through joint EU-Liberia management structures and five independent audits. These assessments consistently found deep-rooted issues in Liberia’s implementation of the VPA, especially the lack of a functional Legality Assurance System, weak institutional capacity, and limited law enforcement.

    While the Boakai administration has renewed efforts to advance the VPA — reactivating joint committees, imposing a moratorium on carbon concessions, and resuming logging revenue payments — these steps have not addressed the deep-rooted structural and implementation issues.

    As a result, the limited likelihood of Forest Law Enforcement Governance Trade licenses combined with low timber trade flows, reduce the relevance of the VPA. The Commission has explained the reasons behind this proposal, notably at the Joint Implementation Committee meeting in November 2024[1].

    The termination of the VPA and the possible transition to a Forest Partnership (FP) open the door to a new phase of cooperation which will support Liberia in aligning with the EU Deforestation Regulation[2] and advancing broader forest governance reforms through more flexible support mechanisms.

    The governance structures under the FPs build on those under the VPA, with participation of all stakeholders, including civil society. The EU Council and the European Parliament exercise scrutiny and provide consent on the conclusion and termination of VPAs. Whilst FPs are a more flexible agreement, they also require scrutiny.

    • [1] https://loggingoff.info/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/EU-GoL2024-AideMemoire-12thVPA-JIC-28-Nov-24-NoAnnexes.pdf.
    • [2] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32023R1115.
    Last updated: 16 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Cancellation of VPAs and replacement by Forest Partnerships – E-001647/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission proposal for termination of the Voluntary Partnership Agreement (VPA) with Liberia is based on a decade of dialogue and close monitoring through joint EU-Liberia management structures and five independent audits. These assessments consistently found deep-rooted issues in Liberia’s implementation of the VPA, especially the lack of a functional Legality Assurance System, weak institutional capacity, and limited law enforcement.

    While the Boakai administration has renewed efforts to advance the VPA — reactivating joint committees, imposing a moratorium on carbon concessions, and resuming logging revenue payments — these steps have not addressed the deep-rooted structural and implementation issues.

    As a result, the limited likelihood of Forest Law Enforcement Governance Trade licenses combined with low timber trade flows, reduce the relevance of the VPA. The Commission has explained the reasons behind this proposal, notably at the Joint Implementation Committee meeting in November 2024[1].

    The termination of the VPA and the possible transition to a Forest Partnership (FP) open the door to a new phase of cooperation which will support Liberia in aligning with the EU Deforestation Regulation[2] and advancing broader forest governance reforms through more flexible support mechanisms.

    The governance structures under the FPs build on those under the VPA, with participation of all stakeholders, including civil society. The EU Council and the European Parliament exercise scrutiny and provide consent on the conclusion and termination of VPAs. Whilst FPs are a more flexible agreement, they also require scrutiny.

    • [1] https://loggingoff.info/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/EU-GoL2024-AideMemoire-12thVPA-JIC-28-Nov-24-NoAnnexes.pdf.
    • [2] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32023R1115.
    Last updated: 16 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – EU climate target for 2040 – E-002269/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission has adopted the proposal to amend the European Climate Law to include the net 90% 2040 climate target on 2 July 2025, following substantial engagement with Member States, European Parliament Groups, stakeholders, civil society and citizens, launched with the Commission’s recommendation on the target in February 2024.

    The proposal provides for a limited number of flexibilities and supports the creation of the right enabling environment to implement the target.

    The flexibilities include a possible limited contribution towards the 2040 target of high-quality international credits starting from 2036, the use of domestic permanent removals in the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS), and enhanced flexibility across sectors to help achieve targets in a cost-effective way.

    It provides for the Commission to ensure that these flexibilities are appropriately reflected in designing the post-2030 legislation needed to achieve the 2040 target, and the future architecture should be based on robust impact assessments.

    In February 2024, the Commission presented a recommended target for 2040, based on a detailed impact assessment[1]. The proposal is based on that impact assessment, which provided a detailed analysis of different levels of net greenhouse gas emissions in 2040 and the associated sectoral pathways bridging 2030 to climate neutrality by 2050.

    Following the setting of the target for 2040, and in line with the foreseen reviews and based on impact assessments, the Commission will prepare a policy architecture beyond 2030.

    • [1] COM(2024) 63 final, SWD/2024/63 final.
    Last updated: 16 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Legal conformity of late amendments to the IHR – Interpretation of Article 55(2) – E-001538/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    As the Commission pointed out in its reply to Written Question E-002978/2024[1], Article 55(2) of the International Health Regulations (2005) (hereafter the ‘IHR’) provides that the Director-General of the World Health Organisation (WHO) shall communicate the text of any proposed amendment to all State Parties at least 4 months before the World Health Assembly at which it is proposed for consideration.

    In fulfilment of this requirement, the WHO Secretariat circulated all proposals for amendments to the IHR, submitted by the IHR State Parties in September 2022, on 16 November 2022, that is 17 months before the 77th World Health Assembly, which began on 27 May 2024, and during which the amendments were adopted.

    As also pointed out by the Commission in its reply to the same written question, the WHO Secretariat has complied with the technical requirements set out under Article 55(2) of the IHR by communicating not only the original proposals for amendments to the IHR on 16 November 2022, but also by communicating to all IHR States Parties all draft changes to these original proposals, as developed by the Working Group on IHR amendments (hereafter the ‘WGIHR’)[2].

    These communications, which occurred at the conclusion of each WGIHR meeting, have ensured that all IHR State Parties had adequate time to fully consider the amendments to the IHR under negotiations, in view of their adoption at the 77th World Health Assembly.

    • [1] https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-10-2024-002978-ASW_EN.html.
    • [2] The WGIHR was established by the World Health Assembly in May 2022 for the negotiations on the IHR amendments and operated as a subdivision of the Assembly. It was composed of all 196 States Parties to the IHR, and of the EU as a regional economic integration organisation.
    Last updated: 16 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Legal conformity of late amendments to the IHR – Interpretation of Article 55(2) – E-001538/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    As the Commission pointed out in its reply to Written Question E-002978/2024[1], Article 55(2) of the International Health Regulations (2005) (hereafter the ‘IHR’) provides that the Director-General of the World Health Organisation (WHO) shall communicate the text of any proposed amendment to all State Parties at least 4 months before the World Health Assembly at which it is proposed for consideration.

    In fulfilment of this requirement, the WHO Secretariat circulated all proposals for amendments to the IHR, submitted by the IHR State Parties in September 2022, on 16 November 2022, that is 17 months before the 77th World Health Assembly, which began on 27 May 2024, and during which the amendments were adopted.

    As also pointed out by the Commission in its reply to the same written question, the WHO Secretariat has complied with the technical requirements set out under Article 55(2) of the IHR by communicating not only the original proposals for amendments to the IHR on 16 November 2022, but also by communicating to all IHR States Parties all draft changes to these original proposals, as developed by the Working Group on IHR amendments (hereafter the ‘WGIHR’)[2].

    These communications, which occurred at the conclusion of each WGIHR meeting, have ensured that all IHR State Parties had adequate time to fully consider the amendments to the IHR under negotiations, in view of their adoption at the 77th World Health Assembly.

    • [1] https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-10-2024-002978-ASW_EN.html.
    • [2] The WGIHR was established by the World Health Assembly in May 2022 for the negotiations on the IHR amendments and operated as a subdivision of the Assembly. It was composed of all 196 States Parties to the IHR, and of the EU as a regional economic integration organisation.
    Last updated: 16 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Embryo research funded under the Horizon Europe programme – E-001947/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    Research activities involving human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) under Horizon Europe can be funded, subject to strict conditions in accordance with the ‘Statement of the Commission on ethics/stem cell research — Artikel 19’[1].

    The scientific evaluation experts must ascertain that there is a necessity to use these cells to reach the scientific objectives. The conditions on the use of human embryos (hE) are even stricter. No activities leading to embryo destruction can be undertaken.

    All proposals with hE/hESCs undergo an in-depth ethics assessment by independent ethics experts, to ensure compliance with relevant EU and international regulations, including the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and Horizon Europe Regulation.

    All resulting requirements become contractual obligations. Proposals that put at risk human embryos or promote eugenic practices are ineligible.

    Each proposal is subjected to the approval by the Member States (Programme Committee) via the Comitology procedure. Only then are the contracts concluded.

    The Commission and funding bodies closely monitor ethics deliverables during project implementation. Relevant project information is publicly available via the human pluripotent stem cell registry[2] and EU CORDIS[3].

    hESC-based models provide unique insights into early human development or disease pathways, enabling the creation of advanced, human-relevant in vitro systems that offer greater predictivity than conventional animal models.

    Responsible and tightly regulated use of hESCs contributes to improving human health and supports the principle of human dignity by upholding strict ethical safeguards and by advancing medical innovation that better respects and protects human life.

    • [1] Statement 2021/C 185/01:https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32021C0512(01).
    • [2] https://hpscreg.eu/browse/projects.
    • [3] https://cordis.europa.eu/.
    Last updated: 16 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Lifting of sanctions against Syria – E-002135/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    Following the fall of the Assad regime, the EU adopted a gradual and reversible approach in order to support Syria’s transition and economic recovery.

    On 24 February 2025, the EU suspended some of its economic sanctions and amended the humanitarian exceptions[1]. The EU has been assessing whether further suspensions could be made, based on close monitoring of the situation on the ground[2].

    On 27 May 2025, the EU lifted all economic sanctions on Syria in order to support the country’s socioeconomic recovery, with the exception of those based on security grounds. The EU maintained sanctions on Assad and his accomplices, in line with its call for accountability and its support to a peaceful transition[3].

    While the humanitarian exceptions already ensured the continued provision of humanitarian assistance, the step of lifting of economic sanctions was broadly welcomed by the humanitarian community in Syria as a way to further enhance the delivery of critical assistance. The lifting of economic sanctions is vital for the swift socioeconomic recovery of Syria that the EU is strongly supporting, including through its recent EUR 175 million package[4].

    On 28 May[5] and 23 June 2025[6], the EU introduced additional listings under the EU Global Human Rights Sanctions Regime, targeting several individuals and entities for serious human rights abuses in Syria, including in relation to the deadly violence and horrific crimes against civilians in the coastal areas in March 2025.

    The EU remains attentive to the actions of the new authorities in ensuring the protection of all Syrians without any kind of discrimination and continues to call for accountability, inclusivity and tolerance. It stands with the Syrian people and remains in close contact with partners in the region and key international partners.

    • [1] https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2025/02/24/syria-eu-suspends-restrictive-measures-on-key-economic-sectors/.
    • [2] https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-6227-2025-ADD-1/en/pdf.
    • [3] https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2025/05/28/syria-eu-adopts-legal-acts-to-lift-economic-sanctions-on-syria-enacting-recent-political-agreement/.
    • [4] https://north-africa-middle-east-gulf.ec.europa.eu/news/eu-announces-eu175-million-support-recovery-syria-2025-06-04_en.
    • [5] See footnote 3.
    • [6] https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2025/06/23/global-human-rights-sanctions-regime-eu-imposes-restrictive-measures-on-five-syrian-individuals-associated-with-the-former-assad-regime-for-supporting-crimes-against-humanity-and-for-fueling-sectarian-violence/.
    Last updated: 16 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Rights of air passengers with disabilities – E-001935/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    In 2023, the Commission proposed[1] a targeted revision of the EU passenger rights legislation with a focus on effective enforcement, including Regulation (EC) No 1107/2006[2] (the ‘Regulation’).

    A broad stakeholder consultation required by the Better Regulation framework[3] preceded the adoption of the Commission proposal, to which representatives of persons with disabilities also contributed.

    The regulation already includes several provisions that oblige operators to actively engage with representatives of persons with disabilities and persons with reduced mobility (PRM).

    For instance, when establishing quality standards for assisting PRM, airport managing bodies are required to collaborate with organisations representing these individuals[4].

    Similarly, airport managing bodies must work with such organisations when designating arrival and departure points where PRM can announce their presence at the airport[5].

    Additionally, Recital 10 of the regulation emphasises that airports and air carriers should have regard to ECAC Doc No 30, Part I, Section 5[6], when organising disability awareness and assistance training for their personnel.

    This document underscores the importance of cooperation between airport managing bodies, air carriers, and organisations representing PRM in developing training programs, policies, and procedures.

    Accordingly, the Commission did not consider that there was a need to impose new obligations on airports and airlines to consult representatives of persons with disabilities.

    • [1] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52023PC0753.
    • [2] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2006/1107/oj/eng.
    • [3] https://commission.europa.eu/law/law-making-process/better-regulation_en.
    • [4] See Article 9(1) of the regulation.
    • [5] See Article 5(1) of the regulation.
    • [6] The latest version of the document (13th Edition, December 2023) can be found at: https://www.ecac-ceac.org/images/activities/facilitation/ECAC-Doc_30_Part_I_Facilitation_13th_edition_13_Dec_2023.pdf.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – The Commission’s study on environmental vignettes for low-emission zones – E-002188/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission has indeed commissioned a study to identify and map EU interoperable technical solutions for demonstrating compliance with access rules, which is the goal of current (physical) eco-stickers when entering low emission zones. The purpose was to inform possible solutions for increasing the efficiency, user-friendliness and non-discriminatory aspects of urban vehicle access regulations (UVARs) across the EU for both vehicle users and city authorities.

    The study has mapped the following technical solutions: (i) a EU Digital Wallet based solution, (ii) facilitating the use of the European Car and Driving License Information System (EUCARIS) by creating an ‘Opt-in’ for private consent giving for sharing vehicle data cross-border for UVAR purpose, (iii) Cooperative-Intelligent Transport System (C-ITS) solutions, with a more long-term perspective.

    The Commission is in the process of finalising the analysis of the study results and will consider the best options for moving forward.

    Last updated: 16 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Ensuring fair and quality access to on-demand transport services for passengers and drivers in the EU – E-002252/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    Passenger transport-on-demand services such as service offered by taxis and Private Hire Vehicle with driver (PHV) complement the local public transport offer. Taxi and PHV offer overwhelmingly local passenger transport services. Cross-border services exist, notably in border regions, but account only for a very small fraction of all taxi and PHV services. The sector is therefore fragmented by nature.

    There is no specific EU legislation in the field of taxis and PHV and Member States are responsible for regulating the sector, in line with general/horizontal EU law, such as the Treaties (notably Article 49 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union[1] which guarantees the freedom of establishment).

    In this context, the Commission continues to pursue infringements of EU law, notably the freedom of establishment enshrined in Article 49 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, which constitutes one of the fundamental pillars of the Single Market.

    The Commission has, in its 2022 Notice on well-functioning and sustainable local passenger transport-on-demand (taxis and PHV)[2], clarified the limits established by EU-law of how Member States may regulate the sector. It does not exclude to update this Notice and/or to take another initiative, the details of which have still to be defined.

    • [1] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/treaty/tfeu_2008/art_49/oj/eng.
    • [2] OJ C 62, 4.2.2022, p. 1.
    Last updated: 16 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Selective enforcement of the rule of law: double standards – E-001886/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission’s work to promote and defend the rule of law is underpinned by equal treatment between Member States, the full respect of EU law and European standards, and a process embedded in dialogue and mutual understanding.

    The Commission has a wide range of tools at its disposal to uphold the rule of law, with the same rules and principles applying to each Member State. These tools include the annual Rule of Law Report, the article 7 procedure, the general regime of conditionality and infringement proceedings.

    The general regime of conditionality[1] is designed to protect against breaches of the principles of the rule of law that affect or seriously risk affecting the EU budget.

    The conditions for its application are established by the Conditionality Regulation adopted by the co-legislators and upheld by the Court of Justice.

    The European Parliament has recognised the effectiveness of the general regime of conditionality. The Commission makes its assessment in an objective, impartial and fair manner, in line with the regulation.

    The Council is the institution that adopts the final decisions. The European Court of Auditors found that the measures taken by the Council in respect of one Member State so far were in line with the regulation.

    Regarding infringement proceedings, Articles 258 and 260 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union allow the Commission to take action when a Member State fails to fulfil its obligations under EU law.

    In its role as guardian of the Treaties, the Commission monitors the application and enforcement of EU law by the Member States and may decide to take appropriate action against a Member State. The Court of Justice is the final arbiter in matters of infringement.

    • [1] http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2020/2092/oj.
    Last updated: 16 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Sustainability of the pension system – E-001555/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission preliminary assessment of the fourth payment request[1] considered the fiscal sustainability requirements of the pension reform as satisfactorily fulfilled[2], noting that ‘the closure clause legislated as part of Milestone 409 ensures that corrective measures enter into force as soon as necessary so that the long-term fiscal sustainability of the pension reforms […] is preserved even under less favourable developments than assumed.’

    The Commission has taken note of the decision by the Council of Ministers to amend Royal Decree 100/2025, which is relevant to the application of the closure clause, since it provides further specification to guide its calculation by the independent fiscal council Independent Authority for Fiscal Responsibility (AIReF) . The Commission is currently assessing the impact of the proposed amendments to Royal Decree 100/2025.

    • [1] https://commission.europa.eu/document/download/e8b93743-5a80-4c10-9caa-4dabedc95728_en?filename=C_2024_4171_1_EN_annexe_acte_autonome_nlw_part1_v2_1.pdf.
    • [2] These requirements are set out in the Council Implementing Decision: https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-10150-2021-ADD-1-REV-2/en/pdf.
    Last updated: 16 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Improving workplace health and safety to prevent deaths from sudden cardiac arrest – E-002329/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission refers to its reply to Question E-001716/2025, noting that the EU’s occupational safety and health (OSH) acquis provides comprehensive protection against all occupational risks, without explicit provisions for specific medical conditions.

    As detailed in the above Commission reply, the development and implementation of specific measures fall under the prerogative of Member States. Nevertheless, there are several EU actions addressing various cardiovascular disease risks.

    The Council, in its conclusions on the improvement of cardiovascular health in the EU[1], among others, invited the Member States to address hazards for cardiovascular health in their OSH policies, as well as to consider promoting the installation and use of automated external defibrillators ( AEDs) in and out of hospital settings, including in communities and physical activity centres.

    There are various EU funding programmes that Member States can use to help fund initiatives for the installation of AEDs in different high-capacity environments. For example, the European Social Fund Plus (ESF+) can be used to fund the purchase of AEDs to be used in public schools, workplaces and similar high-capacity environments as part of a wider operation (and not as a standalone purchase).

    The Commission is currently reviewing the Workplace Directive[2] and the Display Screen Equipment Directive[3] to address new ways of working.

    • [1] Cardiovascular health: Council calls for more robust efforts to help prevent cardiovascular diseases — Consilium.
    • [2] Council Directive 89/654/EEC of 30 November 1989 concerning the minimum safety and health requirements for the workplace (first individual directive within the meaning of Article 16 (1) of Directive 89/391/EEC). OJ L 393, 30.12.1989, p. 1-12. — https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/1989/654/oj/eng.
    • [3] Council Directive 90/270/EEC of 29 May 1990 on the minimum safety and health requirements for work with display screen equipment (fifth individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16 (1) of Directive 89/391/EEC) (90/270/EEC). OJ L 156 21.6.1990, p. 14. — https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/1990/270/oj/eng.
    Last updated: 16 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Israeli Gaza Strip occupation plan – P-001825/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The European Council in March 2025[1] deplored the breakdown of the ceasefire in Gaza and called for an immediate return to the full implementation of the ceasefire-hostage release agreement. It stressed the need for a ceasefire leading to the release of all hostages and a permanent end to hostilities.

    The EU has been consistently calling for the immediate resumption of humanitarian aid at scale into Gaza. The High Representative/Vice-President (HR/VP) of the Commission, the Commissioner for the Mediterranean and the Commissioner for Equality, Preparedness and Crisis Management called for the lifting of the blockade on humanitarian aid into Gaza (statements of 12 April 2025[2] and 7 May 2025[3]).

    Following the exchange at the Foreign Affairs Council on 20 May 2025, with the support of the majority of Member States, the HR/VP announced the review of Israel’s compliance with Article 2 of the Association Agreement in view of the untenable humanitarian situation in Gaza.

    This was discussed with Member States at the Foreign Affairs Council on 23 June 2025 as well as the European Council on 26 June 2025. The Foreign Affairs Council will revisit the issue on 15 July 2025. It will be up to Member States to decide the next steps, if any.

    The Commission has allocated EUR 170 million of humanitarian assistance for Gaza and the West Bank in 2025 so far. This brings the total support to over EUR 500 million since 2023 (EUR 102 million in 2023 and EUR 237 million in 2024).

    The Commission continues its utmost efforts to ensure full compliance with IHL and advocate for unimpeded access for all its humanitarian partners.

    • [1] https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/viyhc2m4/20250320-european-council-conclusions-en.pdf.
    • [2] https://north-africa-middle-east-gulf.ec.europa.eu/news/joint-statement-high-representative-kallas-and-commissioners-suica-and-lahbib-humanitarian-situation-2025-04-12_en.
    • [3] https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/de/statement_25_1155.
    Last updated: 16 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Completion of Crete’s Northern Highway – E-002774/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002774/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Kostas Papadakis (NI)

    The Greek Parliament has recently signed the concession contract for the project for the design, construction, financing, operation, maintenance and capitalisation of Crete’s Northern Highway (known by its Greek abbreviation as the ΒΟΑΚ) in the Chania-Heraklion section. The BOAK is a private motorway intended to meet the needs of the hotel, tourist, commercial and construction sectors, and not the those of ordinary people, residents and visitors of Crete. The BOAK will operate as a closed road, collecting overt as well as ‘hidden’ tolls (guaranteed subsidies and compensation from concession clauses), which will cost ordinary people dearly.

    The Nea Dimokratia Government is basing its decision to levy tolls on Directive 1999/62/EC and Directive (EU) 2022/362, which allow tolls and other charges to be levied, even if the construction of motorways has not been completed. As regards the design of the BOAK, it bisects the urban centres of Chania and Rethimno and cuts the city of Heraklion in two, while alternative toll-free roads do not exist.

    In view of the above, can the Commission say:

    • 1.What is the Commission’s position on the calls by the island’s grassroots organisations for the BOAK to be completed ensuring that it is exclusively public, modern, safe and free of charge, abolishing all types of tolls and charges, and that it be unified as far as Sitia, with tunnels in the Heraklion urban area to avoid cutting it in two?
    • 2.What view does it take of the demand for the highway’s financing, construction, maintenance and operation to be the sole responsibility of the State, without any commercialisation?

    Submitted: 8.7.2025

    Last updated: 16 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Sener Levent, who was awarded the European Citizen’s Prize in 2018, once again faces Turkish persecution – P-002839/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Priority question for written answer  P-002839/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Giorgos Georgiou (The Left)

    Sener Levent, who was awarded the European Citizen’s Prize in 2018, is once again being persecuted by Türkiye. To be specific, the Turkish Cypriot journalist and publisher of the ‘Avrupa’ newspaper is at risk of being extradited to Türkiye by the pseudo-state and subsequently imprisoned in connection with an article and a cartoon that were considered to be ‘publicly insulting the nation, the State, the National Assembly, the government, the judiciary, the army and the security forces of Türkiye’! This development is another arbitrary and illegal extension of Türkiye’s growing interference and pressure in relation to the internal issues of the Turkish Cypriot community.

    In view of the long-standing attempts by the Turkish State to silence and intimidate Sener Levent and other journalists, activists and politicians, as well as the right of all citizens to freedom of opinion and expression, what immediate measures does the Commission intend to take to protect Sener Levent, a European citizen who has been awarded the European Citizen’s Prize?

    Submitted: 11.7.2025

    Last updated: 16 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Security: Tampa Man Pleads Guilty To Robbing Two Convenience Stores With Firearms

    Source: United States Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Explosives (ATF)

    Tampa, FL – United States Attorney Gregory W. Kehoe announces that Ronald Brown (24, Tampa) has pleaded guilty to two robberies, conspiracy to commit those robberies, and brandishing a firearm during both those robberies. Brown faces up to 20 years in prison on each of the robbery counts. For each of the firearms counts, he faces a minimum sentence of seven years, up to life, in federal prison consecutive to any other sentence imposed. A sentencing date has not yet been set.

    According to court documents and proceedings, in July 2024, Brown conspired with others to rob two convenience stores in Tampa. Two firearms were used in, and brandished, during the robberies. Law enforcement located the suspects a few days after the robberies at a hotel in Tampa. A review of surveillance footage from the hotel showed Brown holding a rifle near the vehicle identified as being used in the robberies. Additional surveillance footage from the hotel showed Brown carrying a long box to the trunk prior to the robbery. Search warrants for multiple hotel rooms were executed and the rifle was located. The rifle belongs to Brown.

    This case was investigated by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, the Hillsborough County Sheriff’s Office, and the Tampa Police Department. It is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Samantha Newman.

    This case is part of Project Safe Neighborhoods (PSN), a program bringing together all levels of law enforcement and the communities they serve to reduce violent crime and gun violence, and to make our neighborhoods safer for everyone. On May 26, 2021, the Department launched a violent crime reduction strategy strengthening PSN based on these core principles: fostering trust and legitimacy in our communities, supporting community-based organizations that help prevent violence from occurring in the first place, setting focused and strategic enforcement priorities, and measuring the results.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: Tampa Man Pleads Guilty To Robbing Two Convenience Stores With Firearms

    Source: United States Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Explosives (ATF)

    Tampa, FL – United States Attorney Gregory W. Kehoe announces that Ronald Brown (24, Tampa) has pleaded guilty to two robberies, conspiracy to commit those robberies, and brandishing a firearm during both those robberies. Brown faces up to 20 years in prison on each of the robbery counts. For each of the firearms counts, he faces a minimum sentence of seven years, up to life, in federal prison consecutive to any other sentence imposed. A sentencing date has not yet been set.

    According to court documents and proceedings, in July 2024, Brown conspired with others to rob two convenience stores in Tampa. Two firearms were used in, and brandished, during the robberies. Law enforcement located the suspects a few days after the robberies at a hotel in Tampa. A review of surveillance footage from the hotel showed Brown holding a rifle near the vehicle identified as being used in the robberies. Additional surveillance footage from the hotel showed Brown carrying a long box to the trunk prior to the robbery. Search warrants for multiple hotel rooms were executed and the rifle was located. The rifle belongs to Brown.

    This case was investigated by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, the Hillsborough County Sheriff’s Office, and the Tampa Police Department. It is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Samantha Newman.

    This case is part of Project Safe Neighborhoods (PSN), a program bringing together all levels of law enforcement and the communities they serve to reduce violent crime and gun violence, and to make our neighborhoods safer for everyone. On May 26, 2021, the Department launched a violent crime reduction strategy strengthening PSN based on these core principles: fostering trust and legitimacy in our communities, supporting community-based organizations that help prevent violence from occurring in the first place, setting focused and strategic enforcement priorities, and measuring the results.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: Philadelphia Man Sentenced to 14 Years in Prison for Two Armed Carjackings

    Source: United States Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Explosives (ATF)

    Defendant Admitted to Four Additional Carjackings; He and Accomplices Lured Victims Through Dating Apps

    PHILADELPHIA – United States Attorney David Metcalf announced that Isiah Surzano-Glover, 22, of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, was sentenced today to 168 months in prison and five years of supervised release by United States District Judge Karen S. Marston for two gunpoint carjackings.

    In March 2024, the defendant was charged by indictment, and he pleaded guilty in November to two counts of carjacking and one count of brandishing a firearm during a crime of violence.

    As detailed in court filings and admitted to by the defendant, on January 2, 2024, at 7:30 p.m., he and accomplices lured victim P.M. to the 5400 block of Walker Street in Philadelphia by posing as a female named “Mercedes” on a dating app. When P.M. arrived, Surzano-Glover and the others, all masked, approached the victim, brandished guns, and threatened to shoot P.M. if he moved. The carjackers took P.M.’s keys, wallet, and phone, and drove away in his 2011 Ford Crown Victoria.

    On January 3, 2024, at approximately 8:30 p.m., the defendant and several others, again using an app and the “Mercedes” ruse, lured R.E. to the 1700 block of Brill Street in Philadelphia. Upon R.E.’s arrival, the masked carjackers pointed handguns at him, pistol-whipped R.E. in the head with a gun, and took his keys and phone. They ordered him to run, then drove away in his 2006 Toyota Tacoma.

    Approximately 30 minutes after R.E. was carjacked, Philadelphia police officers located R.E.’s Tacoma parked unattended at 5000 Valley Street, approximately half a mile from the scene of the crime. Other officers then observed what proved to be P.M.’s Crown Victoria, parked in an alley near the intersection of Pratt and Hawthorne streets, about a quarter of a mile from 5000 Valley Street, and placed the car under surveillance.

    Around 10:15 p.m., P.M.’s Crown Victoria drove off and officers followed. The vehicle made its way to 5000 Valley Street, where a police car was alongside R.E.’s Tacoma, and then sped off, initiating a police pursuit. Multiple individuals eventually bailed from P.M.’s vehicle at the intersection of Worth Street and Margaret Street, and the defendant was arrested, following a foot pursuit.

    In addition to the above crimes with which he was charged, Surzano-Glover admitted to participating in four other Philadelphia carjackings.

    The case was investigated by the ATF and the Philadelphia Police Department and is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Michael Miller and Kwambina Coker.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: Philadelphia Man Sentenced to 14 Years in Prison for Two Armed Carjackings

    Source: United States Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Explosives (ATF)

    Defendant Admitted to Four Additional Carjackings; He and Accomplices Lured Victims Through Dating Apps

    PHILADELPHIA – United States Attorney David Metcalf announced that Isiah Surzano-Glover, 22, of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, was sentenced today to 168 months in prison and five years of supervised release by United States District Judge Karen S. Marston for two gunpoint carjackings.

    In March 2024, the defendant was charged by indictment, and he pleaded guilty in November to two counts of carjacking and one count of brandishing a firearm during a crime of violence.

    As detailed in court filings and admitted to by the defendant, on January 2, 2024, at 7:30 p.m., he and accomplices lured victim P.M. to the 5400 block of Walker Street in Philadelphia by posing as a female named “Mercedes” on a dating app. When P.M. arrived, Surzano-Glover and the others, all masked, approached the victim, brandished guns, and threatened to shoot P.M. if he moved. The carjackers took P.M.’s keys, wallet, and phone, and drove away in his 2011 Ford Crown Victoria.

    On January 3, 2024, at approximately 8:30 p.m., the defendant and several others, again using an app and the “Mercedes” ruse, lured R.E. to the 1700 block of Brill Street in Philadelphia. Upon R.E.’s arrival, the masked carjackers pointed handguns at him, pistol-whipped R.E. in the head with a gun, and took his keys and phone. They ordered him to run, then drove away in his 2006 Toyota Tacoma.

    Approximately 30 minutes after R.E. was carjacked, Philadelphia police officers located R.E.’s Tacoma parked unattended at 5000 Valley Street, approximately half a mile from the scene of the crime. Other officers then observed what proved to be P.M.’s Crown Victoria, parked in an alley near the intersection of Pratt and Hawthorne streets, about a quarter of a mile from 5000 Valley Street, and placed the car under surveillance.

    Around 10:15 p.m., P.M.’s Crown Victoria drove off and officers followed. The vehicle made its way to 5000 Valley Street, where a police car was alongside R.E.’s Tacoma, and then sped off, initiating a police pursuit. Multiple individuals eventually bailed from P.M.’s vehicle at the intersection of Worth Street and Margaret Street, and the defendant was arrested, following a foot pursuit.

    In addition to the above crimes with which he was charged, Surzano-Glover admitted to participating in four other Philadelphia carjackings.

    The case was investigated by the ATF and the Philadelphia Police Department and is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Michael Miller and Kwambina Coker.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI USA: Duckworth, Young, Colleagues Reintroduce Bipartisan Bill to Increase Investment in Small Businesses

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Illinois Tammy Duckworth

    July 16, 2025

    [WASHINGTON, D.C.] – U.S. Senator Tammy Duckworth (DIL) joined U.S. Senators Todd Young (RIN), Ruben Gallego (DAZ) and Jim Risch (RID) in reintroducing the Investing in Main Street Act to increase investment in small businesses by permitting banks to invest up to 15 percent of their capital in Small Business Investment Companies (SBIC). 

    “Small businesses are the backbone of our economy—when they grow, our economy grows,” said Duckworth. “Yet too many small business owners have trouble accessing affordable capital to grow their business and create new jobs in their communities. I am proud to join Senators Young, Risch and Gallego in introducing this bipartisan legislation to help get more dollars in the hands of small business owners in Illinois and across our nation.”

    “The Small Business Investment Company program has provided critical support to countless Hoosier small businesses,” said Young. “Our legislation will help spur further investment in innovative startups and unlock capital for existing, high-growth small businesses across America.”

    “Starting a small business gives those willing to work hard a shot at achieving the American dream. But without access to capital, it’s nearly impossible to get a small business off the ground,” said Gallego. “This commonsense, bipartisan bill helps unlock more capital for Main Street, empowering small businesses across the country to grow, innovate and create jobs. I’m proud to introduce it with my colleagues.”

    “Idaho small businesses fuel our economy, employ our friends and family and are the lifeblood of our communities,” said Risch. “The Investing in Main Street Act supports our Gem State entrepreneurs’ access to early-stage capital by allowing banks to invest more into Small Business Investment Companies.”

    In 1958, the Small Business Administration launched the SBIC program to facilitate and regulate investment from privately owned companies to U.S. small businesses. This program has successfully allowed more small businesses across America to expand their competitive edge, create more jobs and contribute to the local economy.

    Copy of the bill text is available on Senator Duckworth’s website.

    -30-



    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Duckworth Stresses Urgent Need to Modernize Our Air Traffic Control Systems at Summit

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Illinois Tammy Duckworth

    July 15, 2025

    [WASHINGTON, D.C.] – U.S. Senator Tammy Duckworth (D-IL)—a member of the U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation (CST) and Ranking Member of the Aviation Subcommittee—today underscored both the long-term and immediate actions the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) must take to improve and modernize our air traffic control systems in order to safeguard our aviation system and the flying public. At today’s Air Traffic Control Modernization Summit hosted by aviation industry stakeholders, Duckworth also emphasized her grave concerns over the Trump Administration firing hundreds of FAA employees and appointing a new FAA Administrator with an established track record of opposing the 1,500-hour pilot training standard, which is critical to ensuring our nation’s pilots are experienced and prepared for any scenario. Photos of the event can be found on Senator Duckworth’s website.

    “The deadly DCA crash, spike in near misses and air traffic control equipment outages our nation has seen are terrifying, but they are not surprising,” said Duckworth. “I’ve been sounding the alarm about close calls and aging equipment for years because the urgent need to overhaul our air traffic control systems, which will take years, has been so clear for so long. But in addition to that long-term overhaul, FAA needs to ensure our current system remains safe—not fire hundreds of staff or reduce our nation’s pilot training gold standard.”

    For years, Duckworth has been sounding the alarm that we must make these critical aviation safety investments immediately to prevent all-too-often near-misses from becoming catastrophic tragedies. Last Congress, Duckworth chaired two CST Aviation Subcommittee hearings—one last December and the other a year prior—to address our aviation industry’s chilling surge in near-deadly close calls and underscore the urgent need to improve air traffic control systems to protect the flying public.

    Last week, Duckworth voted against the nomination of Bryan Bedford to serve as FAA Administrator after he refused to commit to upholding the 1,500-hour rule when she pressed him on the issue during his nomination hearing. Duckworth criticized Bedford for leaving the door open for him to unilaterally attempt to weaken this standard and produce less-prepared pilots despite the serious challenges our nation is facing with regard to aviation safety.

    -30-



    MIL OSI USA News