NewzIntel.com

Category: DJF

  • MIL-OSI USA: Trustees Announced to NYS Interest Lawyer Account Fund

    Source: US State of New York

    overnor Kathy Hochul today announced six trustee appointments to the New York State Interest on Lawyer Account Fund (IOLA). IOLA helps low-income New Yorkers obtain civil legal services to protect their needs. Established in 1983, IOLA pools interest from lawyer trust accounts to provide civil legal aid and support justice system improvements at no cost to taxpayers, lawyers or their clients.

    “I’m committed to helping New York’s most vulnerable secure legal resources in times of need, and the IOLA board helps bring those resources to bear — providing vital legal services to thousands of New Yorkers in need of legal assistance,” Governor Hochul said. “These appointees embody what it means to serve others. I am encouraged by their commitment to the law, civil legal services and the most vulnerable, and I am confident that with their leadership, IOLA will continue to fulfill its important mission.”

    As Chair and Trustee:

    Pei Pei Cheng de Castro

    Pei Pei Cheng de Castro is a partner in Commercial Litigation & Complex Trials and White Collar & Government Investigations at Barclay Damon LLP. Previously, Cheng de Castro was a Deputy Counsel to Governor Kathy Hochul from 2021 to 2024.

    Cheng de Castro obtained a J.D. from New York Law School in 2000 and a B.A. in Environmental Science and Economics from the University of California, Berkeley in 1997.

    As Trustees:

    Rahul Agarwal

    Rahul Agarwal is a Partner in White Collar and Litigation at Friedman Kaplan Seiler Adelman & Robbins LLP, a position he began in 2024. Previously, Agarwal was a Deputy Chief Counsel in the office of the Mayor of the City of New York from 2022 to 2023.

    Agarwal obtained a J.D. from Columbia Law School in 2006, and a B.A. from Brown University in 2001.

    Darren J. Cohen

    Darren J. Cohen is the Associate General Counsel for Clipboard Health, a position he has held since 2023. Previously, Cohen was the Senior Counsel for the Office of Governor Kathy Hochul in 2023.

    Cohen obtained a J.D. from Yale Law School in 2004 and a B.A. in English from Columbia University in 2004.

    Jason C. Hegt

    Jason C. Hegt is a Partner in the Litigation and Trial Department at Latham & Watkins, a position he has held since 2018. Previously, Hegt was an Associate at Latham & Watkins from 2009 to 2017.

    Hegt obtained his J.D. from American University Washington College of Law in 2009 and a B.A. in Political Science from Emory University in 2004.

    Sylvia O. Hinds-Radix

    Sylvia O. Hinds-Radix was most recently the Corporate Counsel for the City of New York from 2022 to 2024. Previously, Hinds-Radix was an Associate Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department, from 2012 to 2022.

    Hinds-Radix obtained a J.D. from Howard University School of Law in 1984, an M.A. in Political Science from Long Island University in 1978, and a B.S. in History from the University of Massachusetts in 1976.

    Daniel M. Kummer

    Daniel M. Kummer is the Principal at DKummer Photography, LLC, a position he began in 2023. Previously, Kummer was a Senior Vice President for Litigation at NBCUniversal Media LLC from 1997 to 2023.

    Kummer obtained a J.D. from the New York University School of Law in 1987, and a B.A. from Wesleyan University in 1982.

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Governor Newsom statement on nationwide injunctions

    Source: US State of California 2

    Jun 27, 2025

    Sacramento, California – Governor Gavin Newsom issued the following statement today after the U.S. Supreme Court announced its ruling on Trump v. CASA, Trump v. Washington, and Trump v. New Jersey:

    In a challenge to the Trump Administration’s blatantly unconstitutional birthright citizenship executive order, the Supreme Court declined to decide whether a nationwide injunction is necessary and appropriate in the lawsuits brought by the States. While the executive order is still temporarily blocked from going into effect, this decision is deeply disappointing. However, California remains hopeful that the lower courts will ensure blatant federal overreach doesn’t go unchecked.

    Governor Gavin Newsom

    Recent news

    Jun 26, 2025

    News SACRAMENTO – Governor Gavin Newsom today announced the following appointments:Kira Younger, of Fair Oaks, has been appointed Chief Financial Officer and Director of the Finance and Accounting Division at the California Department of Social Services. Younger has…

    Jun 26, 2025

    News What you need to know: La Passeggiata on Lindsey Street in Stockton is the latest site to be transformed from excess, underutilized state land into affordable housing under Governor Newsom’s executive order. STOCKTON — Today, state leaders broke ground on a new…

    Jun 25, 2025

    News What you need to know: There are many disingenuous claims swirling about California gas prices “set to soar” – the truth is that gas prices won’t come anywhere close to increasing by 65 cents, as many would have you believe.   SACRAMENTO – California gas prices…

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Senator Markey Statement on Supreme Court Birthright Citizenship Ruling: “None of Us Are Safe”

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Massachusetts Ed Markey

    Washington (June 27, 2025) – Senator Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.) released the following statement after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Trump v. Casa, Inc. that district court judges lack the authority to grant nationwide injunctions.

    “This ruling is what happens when the Supreme Court is packed with right-wing extremists who are not only unwilling to stand up to Donald Trump, but are happy to bend over backwards for him,” said Senator Markey. “Since retaking office, Donald Trump has issued unconstitutional policy after unconstitutional policy, and it has been the federal district courts that have been doing the job of upholding our Constitution and holding Trump to account, especially the judges on the Massachusetts federal district court. Today’s ruling in the birthright citizenship case preventing a federal district court judge from protecting individuals all across the country undermines our democracy. With decisions like this, it is becoming clearer every day that none of us are safe from this administration’s attacks. We must continue to stand up, speak out, and fight the Trump administration’s authoritarian march.”

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Senator Markey Statement on Supreme Court Ruling to Uphold the E-Rate Program

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Massachusetts Ed Markey

    Washington (June 27, 2025) – Senator Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.), member of the Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee, released the following statement after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Federal Communications Commission v. Consumers’ Research that the Universal Service Fund (USF) is constitutional. The USF funds broadband programs, including the E-Rate program, which provides funding to connect schools and libraries to the internet.

    “Today’s ruling reaffirms that the E-Rate program is the essential broadband lifeline for education in the twenty-first century, benefitting millions of students in Massachusetts and across the country. Without it, too many classrooms would fall into digital darkness and too many students would be left offline and unable to compete. Thanks to this ruling, E-Rate will continue serving as a great technological equalizer for millions of students. I will continue fighting to protect and expand the E-Rate program, so that every child — regardless of their zip code — has access to the internet.”

    Senator Markey is the House author of the original E-Rate program, which has invested more than $62 billion to connect schools and libraries to the internet across the country. Massachusetts schools and libraries have received more than $930 million from the E-Rate program and another $97 million from the Emergency Connectivity Fund, a $7 billion program that Senators Markey and Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) created within the American Rescue Plan to provide devices and connectivity for students and educators at home.

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Cybersecurity of solar energy infrastructure – E-001383/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The objective of the risk assessment is to assess to what extent intentional widespread attacks on solar infrastructure can affect the stability of the European electricity grid.

    The scope of this risk assessment is solar energy infrastructure and related infrastructure, with a focus on smart infrastructure that can affect the electricity grid.

    The Commission will carefully review the outcomes of the risk assessment and, if relevant, reflect on potential follow-up proposals.

    On cybersecurity, the EU has a comprehensive framework in force with the directive for measures for a high common level of cybersecurity across the Union (NIS2)[1] and the Cyber Resilience Act[2], which focuses on cybersecurity requirements for products with digital elements.

    Moreover, the EU also has a specific technical binding rules for cybersecurity in the cross-border electricity flows in the EU and neighbouring countries.

    Within the scope of the Net-Zero Industry Act (NZIA)[3], the Commission has introduced pre-qualification and award criteria for cybersecurity in procurement procedures and auctions.

    • [1] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32022L2555.
    • [2] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32024R2847.
    • [3] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L_202401735.
    Last updated: 27 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Implementation of the Migration Pact in the context of the Polish Government’s position – temporary protection and financial contributions – P-001105/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Council Implementing Decision 2022 /382[1], establishing the existence of a mass influx of displaced persons from Ukraine and having the effect of introducing temporary protection, specifies in Article 2(1) and (2) the categories of persons who receive temporary protection and their rights.

    Member States must ensure that beneficiaries of temporary protection on their territory enjoy these rights. For further information on the obligations of Member States, the Commission refers the Honourable Member to the guidance documents and operational guidelines[2].

    According to Article 64(1) of the Asylum and Migration Management Regulation (AMMR)[3], financial contributions consist of transfers from the contributing Member States to the EU budget.

    Pursuant to Article 64(2) of the AMMR, the benefitting Member States shall identify actions eligible for funding, and the Commission shall collaborate closely with them to ensure that those actions correspond to the objectives of the Annual Solidarity Pool (Articles 56(2)(b) and 56(3)) of the AMMR.

    The Commission is working on the assessment of migratory pressure, risk of migratory pressure and significant migratory situation. The assessments of these situations will be based on both quantitative and qualitative data, in accordance with Articles 9 and 10 of the AMMR.

    • [1] Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/382 of 4 March 2022 establishing the existence of a mass influx of displaced persons from Ukraine within the meaning of Article 5 of Directive 2001/55/EC, and having the effect of introducing temporary protection, OJ L 71, 4.3.2022, p. 1-6 (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dec_impl/2022/382/oj/eng).
    • [2] https://home-affairs.ec.europa.eu/policies/migration-and-asylum/asylum-eu/temporary-protection-0_en?prefLang=da#obligations-of-eu-countries-towards-persons-enjoying-temporary-protection .
    • [3] Regulation (EU) 2024/1351 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 May 2024 on asylum and migration management, amending Regulations (EU) 2021/1147 and (EU) 2021/1060 and repealing Regulation (EU) No 604/2013, OJ L, 2024/1351, 22.5.2024 (http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1351/oj).
    Last updated: 27 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Authoritarian restructuring of the Turkish state without consequences for EU candidate status – E-001451/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The April 2024 European Council conclusions[1] highlighted the EU’s strategic interest in a stable and secure environment in the Eastern Mediterranean and in the development of a cooperative and mutually beneficial relationship with Türkiye. This aligns with the November 2023 Joint Communication[2], advocating for a progressive, proportionate, and reversible approach.

    As an EU candidate country and long-standing member of the Council of Europe, Türkiye is expected to apply the highest democratic standards and practices.

    Full respect for fundamental rights and the rule of law will continue to be an integral part of EU-Türkiye relations. The Commission’s position on the arrest of the Mayor of Istanbul on 19 March 2025 was spelled out in the joint statement[3] of the High Representative/Vice-President and Commissioner for Enlargement and Eastern Neighbourhood, issued on the day of the mayor’s detention.

    The statement stressed that the events gave rise to questions regarding Türkiye’s adherence to its long-established democratic tradition. The EU urged the Turkish authorities to provide full transparency and follow due process.

    Accession negotiations with Türkiye remain at a standstill since June 2018, following the decisions of the Council[4]. This position was re-confirmed by the Council in December 2024[5].

    Consequently, the Commission has reduced financial support to Türkiye, with funding reoriented towards support for civil society organisations and EU key priorities.

    • [1] https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/m5jlwe0p/euco-conclusions-20240417-18-en.pdf.
    • [2] https://enlargement.ec.europa.eu/joint-communication-european-council-state-play-eu-turkiye-political-economic-and-trade-relations-0_en.
    • [3] https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/statement_25_836.
    • [4] https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/35863/st10555-en18.pdf.
    • [5] https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-16983-2024-INIT/en/pdf.
    Last updated: 27 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Changes to cohesion policy and their impact on regional disparity – E-001656/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission’s proposal of 1 April 2025[1] for a regulation amending the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), the Cohesion Fund, and the Just Transition Fund as regards specific measures to address specific challenges in the context of the mid-term review does not propose a change to the distribution of the resources across the different categories of regions, nor to the provisions governing possible transfers between categories of regions or to the methodology on the allocation per Member State[2].

    Therefore, required resources for less developed regions cannot be used for transition or more developed regions. Furthermore, the possibilities provided for in the proposal are of a voluntary nature and amendments of individual programmes require prior approval by the relevant monitoring committee before they are submitted to the Commission.

    The implementation data submitted by the Member States indicates that some of the 2021-2027 resources remain unallocated. At a time of mounting challenges and limited fiscal space, it is necessary to maximise the utilisation of the available allocations, and the managing authorities will have the opportunity to direct them towards strategic investments that address urgent challenges which risk weakening the economic, social and territorial cohesion of the EU.

    • [1] COM(2025) 123 final.
    • [2] Articles 110, 111 and Annex XXVI of Regulation (EU) 2021/1060 (the Common Provisions Regulation).
    Last updated: 27 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Need for broader deregulation and simplification to reduce administrative burdens – E-001664/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The target for reducing reporting obligations’ burden has been set at 25% in March 2023, in the ‘Long term competitiveness’ Communication[1].

    As indicated in the communication ‘A Simpler and Faster Europe’[2], this target has been expanded to cover all administrative burden, and up to 35% for small and medium enterprises (SMEs). This represents a target of EUR 37.5 billion of savings over the mandate.

    The President of the Commission has made the reduction of red tape a priority for the new mandate of the Commission as explained in answer to E-1084/2025.

    The roadmap has been set in the ‘Competitiveness compass’ and the communication ‘A Simpler and Faster Europe’ and simplification omnibuses have been adopted on 26 February, 14 May, 21 May and 17 June 2025. However, while aiming at achieving significant simplification, the Commission proposals nevertheless preserve the EU policy goals.

    The Better Regulation tools have been reinforced (e.g. through the SME and Competitiveness checks, and the scrutiny of delegated and implementing acts) to ensure that EU legislation is designed with implementation and simplification in mind right from the outset.

    The communication also underscores the important role of the co-legislators for this process:

    ‘The European Parliament and the Council have a central role to play in creating simple and effective rules at the lowest administrative cost for people and companies. In 2016, both institutions committed to the principle of assessing the impacts of their substantial amendments when appropriate’.

    • [1] https://commission.europa.eu/system/files/2023-03/Communication_Long-term-competitiveness.pdf.
    • [2] https://commission.europa.eu/document/download/8556fc33-48a3-4a96-94e8-8ecacef1ea18_en?filename=250201_Simplification_Communication_en.pdf.
    Last updated: 27 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Commission’s assesment of EIOPA findings regarding NOVIS case – E-001855/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    Under Article 30 of the Solvency II Directive[1], the financial supervision of insurance undertakings with their head office located in the territory of a Member State is the sole responsibility of the supervisory authority of that Member State.

    The Commission’s opinion issued according to Article 17(4) of the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) Regulation[2] concerns the way and the extent to which the national supervisor exercised its supervisory powers under the Solvency II Directive following the detection of non-compliance by a Slovakian insurance undertaking with Solvency II requirements.

    Article 17(4) of the EIOPA Regulation does not confer on the Commission any powers to open an autonomous investigation upon any individual undertaking that is the object of the national competent authority’s supervision. This provision provides that the Commission’s formal opinion shall take into account the EIOPA’s recommendation.

    The factual background and assessment of the situation of the Slovak insurance undertaking referred to in the Commission’s opinion are based on the evidence and assessment provided by the national supervisory authority, which is the sole authority empowered to exercise direct supervisory competence towards insurance undertakings under its jurisdiction, and by EIOPA, including in the context of inspections of a collaboration platform.

    The Commission and EIOPA discussed the findings referred to in the EIOPA Recommendation and concurred that supervisory action was necessary.

    • [1] OJ L 335, 17.12.2009, p. 1-155.
    • [2] OJ L 331, 15.12.2010, p. 48-83.
    Last updated: 27 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Transparency in the allocation of European funds intended for persons with disabilities in France – E-001925/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The European Social Fund Plus (ESF+) is implemented under shared management. It is up to Member States to decide which measures they want to invest in, in line with the specific objectives of the ESF+ Regulation[1].

    All Managing Authorities (MA) must have a website with information on programmes under its responsibility, covering the programme’s objectives, activities, available funding opportunities, achievements, and a list of operations selected for support (Article 49 of the Common Provisions Regulation (CPR)[2]).

    For the selection of operations, the MA shall establish and apply criteria and procedures which are non-discriminatory, transparent, ensure accessibility to persons with disabilities, ensure gender equality, and take account of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (‘the Charter’), the principle of sustainable development and the EU policy on environment (Article 73(1) of the CPR).

    Article 69(7) of the CPR stipulates that it is the Member States’ responsibility to ensure the effective examination of complaints concerning the Funds.

    The scope, rules and procedures concerning those arrangements are the responsibility of Member States in accordance with their institutional and legal framework. This is without prejudice to the general possibility of citizens and stakeholders to address complaints to the Commission.

    The Horizontal Enabling Conditions on the effective application and implementation of the Charter and on the implementation and application of the United Nations Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities (UNCRPD) reiterate that Member States need to have reporting arrangements to the monitoring committee regarding cases of non-compliance of operations in place.

    • [1] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32021R1057 .
    • [2] Regulation (EU) 2021/1060 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 June 2021 laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund Plus, the Cohesion Fund, the Just Transition Fund and the European Maritime, Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund and financial rules for those and for the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund, the Internal Security Fund and the Instrument for Financial Support for Border Management and Visa Policy.
    Last updated: 27 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Briefing – Belgium’s National Recovery and Resilience Plan: Latest state of play – 27-06-2025

    Source: European Parliament

    The EU’s Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF) is the core component of Next Generation EU (NGEU). By promoting the sustainable and inclusive recovery after the COVID-19 pandemic that ensures the green and digital transitions make progress, the RRF is consistent with the European Commission’s priorities. Belgium’s initial maximum contribution to finance its national recovery and resilience plan (NRRP) was set to €5 924 million in grants. The amount was updated in June 2022 and reduced to €4 523 million. In addition, the non-repayable allocation for the REPowerEU chapter to reinforce the NRRP’s energy dimension is set at €281 million. Belgium also submitted a reasoned request to transfer part of its allocation from the resources of the Brexit Adjustment Reserve to the RRF (€228 million). Finally, Belgium requested a loan support of €264 million. The overall EU financial contribution to the amended Belgian NRRP stands thus at €5 298 million; it represents 0.7 % of the entire RRF, and 1.1 % of Belgium’s gross domestic product (GDP) in 2019. The Council approved Belgium’s amended NRRP in December 2023. Other targeted revisions took place in 2024 and 2025. In total, Belgium has received €2.46 billion so far: €915.1 million in pre-financing – 13 % of the initial NRRP (€770 million, all grants) in 2021, and 20 % of the REPowerEU chapter (€102.1 million in grants, €43 million in loans) in 2024; and two result-based instalments – one of €631.6 million (all grants) in September 2024, and another of €909 million (of which €40 million in loans) in May 2025. The European Parliament, which was a major advocate of creating a common EU recovery instrument, participates in interinstitutional forums for cooperation and discussion on RRF implementation and scrutinises the European Commission’s work. This briefing is one in a series covering all EU Member States. Third edition. The ‘NGEU delivery’ briefings are updated at key stages throughout the lifecycle of the plans.

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Canada: Health Canada launches public consultation on proposed changes to increase oversight of precursor chemicals and drug equipment

    Source: Government of Canada News (2)

    June 27, 2025 | Ottawa, Ontario | Health Canada

    The Government of Canada is taking action to keep communities safe on both sides of the border. This includes detecting and disrupting the illegal fentanyl trade.

    Today, the Minister of Health, Marjorie Michel, launched a 45-day public consultation on proposed changes to how Canada regulates precursor chemicals and devices such as pill presses and encapsulators that could be used in the illegal production of drugs. The consultation is open until August 12, 2025.

    The public consultation will allow impacted stakeholders, such as regulated industries that use precursors for legitimate uses, pharmacies and individual pharmacists, to provide feedback on the proposed changes. These changes would strengthen controls around precursor chemicals and drug equipment to support law and border enforcement as they take action to stop their illegal importation and distribution.  

    MIL OSI Canada News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Arbitrary detention of peaceful protesters and their detention conditions in Türkiye – E-001704/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The EU reacted swiftly to the detention of mayor İmamoğlu and the arrests and charges brought against elected officials, political activists, civil society and businesses representatives, journalists, and others with the Statement of the High Representative/Vice-President and Commissioner for Enlargement of 19 March 2025[1].

    On 24 March 2025,[2] the Commission urged the Turkish authorities to uphold democratic values and to fully respect the rights of elected officials as well as right of peaceful demonstration.

    It reminded that as a Council of Europe member and EU candidate, Türkiye must uphold democratic values. The Commission, as well as the Delegation of the EU to Türkiye, expressed both in public and in private meetings with the Turkish authorities the need for Türkiye to uphold the EU standards in relation to freedom of expression and of assembly, including in relation to recent detentions of peaceful protesters in recent weeks.

    The Commission has regularly raised its concerns on the detention conditions in Turkish prisons and detention centres in its enlargement reports on Türkiye[3] and in particular on the need to improve access to healthcare, rehabilitation and resocialisation programmes.

    • [1] https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/statement_25_836.
    • [2] https://audiovisual.ec.europa.eu/en/video/I-269761.
    • [3] https://enlargement.ec.europa.eu/turkiye-report-2024_en.
    Last updated: 27 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Global Gateway initiative – E-002457/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002457/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Engin Eroglu (Renew), Joachim Streit (Renew)

    The Global Gateway initiative aims to offer a strategic alternative to China’s Belt and Road Initiative. Funded by European taxpayers, it seeks to promote European values and interests worldwide.

    However, media reports indicate that Chinese state-owned enterprises have won major contracts under EU-funded projects abroad. In some years, they reportedly secured more contract value financed by the European Investment Bank (EIB) than European firms.

    This raises serious concerns about the responsible use of EU funds, the competitiveness of European industry, and the EU’s strategic autonomy.

    • 1.Can the Commission confirm the accuracy of recent media reports regarding Chinese companies being awarded contracts under Global Gateway and in EIB-funded projects, and clarify the extent of their involvement?
    • 2.What measures is the Commission taking – both independently and in cooperation with the EIB – to ensure that EU-funded infrastructure projects do not benefit strategic competitors or undermine Europe’s geopolitical and economic interests, and that European companies and workers benefit fairly from these initiatives?
    • 3.What reforms to the EIB’s procurement rules for non-EU projects could help block tenders based on unfair competition, such as incorporating principles from the Foreign Subsidies Regulation[1]?

    Submitted: 18.6.2025

    • [1] Regulation (EU) 2022/2560 of 14 December 2022 on foreign subsidies distorting the internal market, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2560/oj.
    Last updated: 27 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Statements by the President of Azerbaijan on achieving international recognition of the pseudo-state through the Organization of Turkic States – E-001683/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The EU has consistently opposed any actions or statements that seek to upgrade the international status of the so-called ‘Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus’, a territory not recognised by the international community.

    Such moves undermine the United Nations (UN) efforts to create a conducive environment for settlement talks. The EU only recognises the Republic of Cyprus as a subject of international law, in line with relevant UN Security Council resolutions.

    The EU has been closely monitoring developments since the Organisation of Turkic States (OTS) Summit in Samarkand in November 2022, when the Turkish Cypriot secessionist entity became an observer to the organisation.

    The EU has expressed its concerns through public statements, including one from the European External Action Service (EEAS) Spokesperson[1], and has actively engaged with all OTS Member States, including Azerbaijan, at all levels on this worrying development. The High Representative/Vice-President has reiterated these concerns in statements made in July[2] and November 2024[3].

    The EU expects its partners to respect the sovereignty and territorial integrity of all states and to avoid taking any steps that contradict this principle.

    This expectation has been clearly communicated to Azerbaijan during the visit of the High Representative/Vice-President of the Commission on 25 April 2025, and the EU will continue to convey this message at all levels of political dialogue.

    The EU remains committed to upholding relevant UN Security Council resolutions and fundamental principles of international law, particularly regarding state sovereignty, independence, and integrity. It will continue to work towards ensuring that these principles are fully respected.

    • [1] https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/cyprus-statement-spokesperson-observer-status-turkish-cypriot-secessionist-entity-organisation_en?s=230.
    • [2] https://www.eeas.europa.eu/node/443430_fr.
    • [3] https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/ots-statement-hrvp-josep-borrell-attempts-legitimise-turkish-cypriot-secessionist-entity_en.
    Last updated: 27 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Imprisoned EU citizens – E-001441/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    Protecting EU citizens abroad, including those who may be imprisoned in non-EU countries, as well as the collection and provision of detailed information regarding the imprisonment of EU citizens in non-EU countries, falls within the exclusive competency of Member States.

    At their request, the European External Action Service can support Member States in coordinating efforts to ensure the consular protection of unrepresented EU citizens, and may facilitate information sharing where possible, but it does not have the mandate to directly collect or disseminate such data.

    Last updated: 27 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Skin sensitisation tests involving the use of guinea pigs – E-001720/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    In 2022, 33 029 skin sensitisation tests were conducted on animals constituting a reduction of 12.2% compared to 2018 and 12.5% compared to 2021.

    Based on ALURES[1] data, most guinea pig sensitisation assays occur in the medical devices (MD) sector. Testing requirements for these are governed by the International Organisation for Standardisation standards, and the relevant standard 10993-10:2021[2] still lists guinea pig assays next to the local lymph node assay (LLNA) and non-animal methods.

    Member States are expected to urge manufacturers to validate the LLNA or other alternatives for specific needs such as MD. Manufacturers should prioritise application of Defined Approaches for skin sensitisation.

    These consist of a combination of non-animal methods and a defined algorithm to interpret results and are described in the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Guideline 497[3]. These approaches have superior performance compared to the LLNA in predicting human responses.

    Member States require regular reporting on progress made with alternatives, or to limit the project authorisation period for animal tests.

    If validation of the alternative fails, use of animals should continue to be allowed. The Commission collaborates closely with Member States to remind them of the obligations[4] under Directive 2010/63[5] to ask product-specific qualification of recognised alternatives.

    The European Partnership for Alternative Approaches to Animal Testing[6] has invited the MD industry to join initiatives such as the skin sensitisation project to share knowledge and accelerate qualification of non-animal methods also by MD manufacturers.

    The Commission will publish a Roadmap on phasing out animal testing which covers MD legislation.

    • [1] https://environment.ec.europa.eu/topics/chemicals/animals-science/statistics-and-non-technical-project-summaries_en.
    • [2] Biological evaluation of medical devices — Part 10: Tests for skin sensitisation.
    • [3] https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/guideline-no-497-defined-approaches-on-skin-sensitisation_b92879a4-en.html.
    • [4] E.g., during bi-annual meetings.
    • [5] Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes, OJ L 276, 20.10.2010, p. 33-79.
    • [6] https://single-market-economy.ec.europa.eu/sectors/chemicals/european-partnership-alternative-approaches-animal-testing_en.
    Last updated: 27 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Further sanctions against Nord Stream – P-002107/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The EU has imposed unprecedented restrictive measures (sanctions) in response to Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, including far-reaching trade restrictions in several economic sectors, and specific financial measures against Russian individuals and entities.

    As the Honourable Member is aware, these sanctions are adopted under the EU’s Common Foreign and Security Policy and are aimed to maximise their impact on Russia’s ability to conduct and finance its war of aggression.

    On 10 June 2025, the Commission President and the High Representative/Vice-President[1] stated that the joint proposal for the 18th sanctions package includes, among other measures, sanctions on the Nord Stream pipelines.

    This measure should prevent Russia from generating any revenue in the future by using those pipelines to transport natural gas. Those future measures are currently discussed in the Council and require a unanimous adoption.

    The proposals and the negotiations in the Council are not public. Hence, the Commission is not able to comment further on measures prior to their adoption in the Council.

    The Commission will continue to cooperate and coordinate closely with Member States and operators on the implementation and enforcement of sanctions once they are adopted.

    • [1] https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/ukrainerussia-press-remarks-high-representativevice-president-kaja-kallas-joint-press-conference_en.
    Last updated: 27 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Further sanctions against Nord Stream – P-002107/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The EU has imposed unprecedented restrictive measures (sanctions) in response to Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, including far-reaching trade restrictions in several economic sectors, and specific financial measures against Russian individuals and entities.

    As the Honourable Member is aware, these sanctions are adopted under the EU’s Common Foreign and Security Policy and are aimed to maximise their impact on Russia’s ability to conduct and finance its war of aggression.

    On 10 June 2025, the Commission President and the High Representative/Vice-President[1] stated that the joint proposal for the 18th sanctions package includes, among other measures, sanctions on the Nord Stream pipelines.

    This measure should prevent Russia from generating any revenue in the future by using those pipelines to transport natural gas. Those future measures are currently discussed in the Council and require a unanimous adoption.

    The proposals and the negotiations in the Council are not public. Hence, the Commission is not able to comment further on measures prior to their adoption in the Council.

    The Commission will continue to cooperate and coordinate closely with Member States and operators on the implementation and enforcement of sanctions once they are adopted.

    • [1] https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/ukrainerussia-press-remarks-high-representativevice-president-kaja-kallas-joint-press-conference_en.
    Last updated: 27 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Delegated act on low carbon hydrogen – E-002477/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002477/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Filip Turek (PfE)

    According to media reports[1] and analyses of information at our disposal, the Commission’s upcoming delegated act on low-carbon hydrogen (LCH) sets very strict criteria for its production, including a tightening of the baseline values for lifecycle emissions calculations. However, the Commission’s proposal still does not allow for the conclusion of power purchase agreements (PPAs) or the direct connection of production facilities to low-carbon electricity sources such as nuclear power plants. Should the current criteria remain unchanged, LCH production in Czechia would be virtually unfeasible.

    • 1.In light of the above, will the Commission allow the certification of nuclear sourced PPAs as soon as possible and not wait until July 2028 to decide on this matter, as is currently proposed?
    • 2.Does the Commission agree that allowing producers to use electricity sourced via PPAs would significantly reduce the emissions associated with LCH, thereby enabling Czechia to ramp up its production?

    Submitted: 19.6.2025

    • [1] https://www.euractiv.com/section/eet/news/draft-eu-low-carbon-hydrogen-rules-face-epp-opposition/.
    Last updated: 27 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – A police officer’s infiltration of the political movement Potere al Popolo: a potential violation of democratic principles and fundamental freedoms – E-002470/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002470/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Pasquale Tridico (The Left), Dario Tamburrano (The Left), Rudi Kennes (The Left), Ilaria Salis (The Left), Mimmo Lucano (The Left), Manon Aubry (The Left), Estrella Galán (The Left), Catarina Martins (The Left), Özlem Demirel (The Left), Carolina Morace (The Left), Marc Botenga (The Left), Martin Schirdewan (The Left), Gaetano Pedulla’ (The Left), Pernando Barrena Arza (The Left), Jussi Saramo (The Left), Mario Furore (The Left), Anthony Smith (The Left), Konstantinos Arvanitis (The Left)

    The recent news regarding an Italian police officer’s infiltration of the political movement Potere al Popolo without apparent judicial authorisation, if confirmed, raises serious concerns about the violation of democratic principles and the rule of law. This episode takes place in an already worrying context, marked by concerns expressed by the Commission in 2024 about the deterioration of press freedom and attacks on independent journalists in Italy.

    Such practices risk undermining the principles enshrined in Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union and Articles 11 and 12 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, and are in conflict with the European Media Freedom Act on the protection of journalists and the promotion of political pluralism.

    • 1.Is the Commission aware of these practices and what measures does it intend to take to ensure the protection of political parties and civic movements in the EU?
    • 2.Does it consider that this case could constitute a violation of the fundamental values of the EU and of the principle of proportionality enshrined in Article 52 of the Charter?
    • 3.Can it clarify whether it is monitoring or if investigations are under way regarding governmental infiltration of political parties, and what instruments it intends to activate to prevent similar interference and ensure the protection of democratic freedoms?

    Submitted: 18.6.2025

    Last updated: 27 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Exemption from extended duty on bicycle parts imported from China – E-001759/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    In the case described by the Honourable Member, it appears that the company importing the bicycle parts is not an exempted party, and the parts that it imports are then sent to an exempted company.

    Regarding the importation, as the company importing the goods is not an exempted party, it can only import in exemption from the extended duties complying with the requirements for end-use of Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 88/97[1].

    The granting of an end-use authorisation, as well as the control of compliance with the requirements and the end-use procedure, are the responsibility of the customs authorities of the Member States.

    Regarding the exempted company, Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 88/97 requires that where that company receives deliveries of essential bicycle parts which have been exempted from the extended duty pursuant to Article 2, those parts are either used in its assembly operations or assembly of other products, destroyed, re-exported, or resold to another exempted party.

    Regarding sales, these parts cannot be resold to non-exempted parties. Any operation not in line with these rules would constitute a breach of the obligations of the exempted party.

    • [1] Commission Regulation (EC) No 88/97 of 20 January 1997 on the authorisation of the exemption of imports of certain bicycle parts originating in the People’s Republic of China from the extension by Council Regulation (EC) No 71/97 of the anti-dumping duty imposed by Council Regulation (EEC) No 2474/93, http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/1997/88/2023-03-21.
    Last updated: 27 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Supporting the development of a strong and competitive European nuclear energy sector – E-001746/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    To deliver the clean energy transition, all zero- and low-carbon energy solutions are needed. When part of the energy mix, nuclear has a role to play in building a resilient and clean energy system.

    Necessary investments will enable the EU to keep its industrial leadership in this sector and upholding the highest standards on safety and management of radioactive waste.

    The Commission presented the Clean Industrial Deal (CID)[1] and the action plan for Affordable Energy[2] to improve competitiveness and reduce energy costs for EU industries in the transition. On 13 June 2025, the Commission adopted the new Nuclear Illustrative Programme (PINC).

    It assesses costs and investment needs covering the full life cycle of nuclear installations, upskilling, diversification, and the development of competitive supply chains.

    The PINC also assesses financing models for a faster development and safe deployment of new nuclear technologies, such as Small Modular Reactors (SMRs), Advanced Modular Reactors and microreactors in Europe.

    Under the reformed internal energy market legislation, nuclear projects have equal access to financing schemes including Contracts for Difference and Power Purchase Agreements[3].

    The Commission works with the European Investment Bank on initiatives announced in the CID, supported by InvestEU, and is preparing a Clean Energy Investment Strategy.

    The Commission has also announced the design phase of a new potential Important Project of Common European Interest candidate on innovative nuclear technologies.

    Based on the first deliverables of the European Industrial Alliance on SMRs, the Commission will table a strategic plan on de-risking SMR projects, strengthening the EU supply chain, and attracting private investment.

    • [1] https://commission.europa.eu/topics/eu-competitiveness/clean-industrial-deal_en.
    • [2] https://energy.ec.europa.eu/strategy/affordable-energy_en.
    • [3] Including combining Contracts for Difference and Power Purchase Agreements.

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Access to school canteens in Sicily and the use of ESF+ and NRRP funds – E-001981/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission acknowledges the situation regarding school canteens in Sicily and is working closely with Italy to ensure the effective implementation of the National Recovery and Resilience Plan[1]. Investment 1.2[2] supports the construction or renovation of canteen spaces for at least 1 000 structures[3].

    This would allow schools to extend school time, increase the educational offer and keep schools open beyond school hours. The Commission will assess its implementation via the target for ‘Structures to host students beyond school time’[4], whose completion is expected by Q2 2026.

    The European Social Fund + (ESF+) regional programme (RP) in Sicily contributes to combat education poverty and improve access to essential services.

    Under its specific objective 4.5[5], the RP launched in 2023 the call ‘Open schools for the territory’[6], making available EUR 27 million[7] to enhance training provision, supporting students at risk of failure and dropout, and promoting schools as cultural hubs. The call also supports access to school canteens, covering the costs of meals for students participating to afternoon activities.

    The ESF+ contributes to the implementation of the Child Guarantee through targeted actions and structural reforms to tackle child poverty.

    To this end, Italy has earmarked EUR 1.1 billion of ESF+ resources, with roughly EUR 25 million[8] to be invested in Sicily. The Commission regularly monitors these funds to ensure goals are met.

    Member States have developed national plans for the Child Guarantee, also overseen by the Commission. Through these efforts, the ESF+ strives to break the cycle of poverty and provide every child with equal opportunities, a crucial aspect for the effective implementation of the Child Guarantee, particularly in regions like Sicily.

    • [1] https://commission.europa.eu/business-economy-euro/economic-recovery/recovery-and-resilience-facility/country-pages/italys-recovery-and-resilience-plan_en.
    • [2] Plan for the extension of full-time under Mission 4, Component 1.
    • [3] The Council Implementing Decision (CID) does not envisage a specific distribution of such structures across Italian regions. It is therefore within the Member State’s remit to decide the allocation of such structures over the national territory.
    • [4] M4C1-21, part of the 10th payment request: ‘At least 1 000 structures are built or upgraded to facilitate the extension of school time and the opening of schools to the territory beyond school hours’.
    • [5] ESO 4.5 ‘Improving the quality, inclusiveness, effectiveness and labour market relevance of education and training systems, including through the validation of non-formal and informal learning, to support the acquisition of key competences, including entrepreneurial and digital skills, and promoting the introduction of dual training systems and apprenticeships (ESF+)’.
    • [6] Avviso 10/2023: https://www.sicilia-fse.it/avvisi-e-bandi/pr-fse-2021-2027/avviso-10-2023.
    • [7] EUR 9 million annually for three consecutive school years 2023-24, 2024-25 and 2025-26.
    • [8] On top of this specific allocation for Sicily, the ESF+ national programmes ‘Social inclusion’ and ‘School and skills’ also contribute to the Child Guarantee across Italy, including in Sicily.

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Addressing medicine shortages by reassessing the revised Urban Wastewater Directive – E-001335/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD)[1] requires the removal of micropollutants from urban wastewaters with quaternary treatment.

    The Polluter-Pays Principle[2] is enshrined in Article 191 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. The European Court of Auditors[3] recommended strengthening the integration of this principle into environmental legislation.

    The UWWTD refers to it[4] and provides for an extended producer responsibility system (EPR) whereby the pharmaceutical and cosmetics sectors, which represent the main source of micropollutants in urban wastewater[5], finance at least 80% of the quaternary treatment costs.

    The impact assessment accompanying the Commission’s proposal assessed the cost of such extended producer responsibility system and its impact[6] on the pharmaceutical sector at EU level.

    In addition, as announced in the Water Resilience Strategy[7] of 4 June 2025, in the context of the implementation of the extended producer responsibility, the Commission will conduct an updated study of costs and its potential impacts on concerned sectors.

    In addition, the Commission will continue to support Member States in the pragmatic design of national systems with a view to avoiding unexpected or unintended consequences, in particular for the availability and affordability of medicines.

    • [1] Directive (EU) 2024/3019 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2024 concerning urban wastewater treatment (recast), OJ L, 2024/3019, 12.12.2024.
    • [2] https://environment.ec.europa.eu/economy-and-finance/ensuring-polluters-pay_en.
    • [3] https://www.eca.europa.eu/en/publications/SR21_12.
    • [4] Article 1 of Directive (EU) 2024/3019.
    • [5] Impact assessment accompanying the proposal for a directive concerning urban wastewater treatment (recast): https://environment.ec.europa.eu/publications/proposal-revised-urban-wastewater-treatment-directive_en.
    • [6] Ibid.
    • [7] https://commission.europa.eu/topics/environment/water-resilience-strategy_en.
    Last updated: 27 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Addressing medicine shortages by reassessing the revised Urban Wastewater Directive – E-001335/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD)[1] requires the removal of micropollutants from urban wastewaters with quaternary treatment.

    The Polluter-Pays Principle[2] is enshrined in Article 191 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. The European Court of Auditors[3] recommended strengthening the integration of this principle into environmental legislation.

    The UWWTD refers to it[4] and provides for an extended producer responsibility system (EPR) whereby the pharmaceutical and cosmetics sectors, which represent the main source of micropollutants in urban wastewater[5], finance at least 80% of the quaternary treatment costs.

    The impact assessment accompanying the Commission’s proposal assessed the cost of such extended producer responsibility system and its impact[6] on the pharmaceutical sector at EU level.

    In addition, as announced in the Water Resilience Strategy[7] of 4 June 2025, in the context of the implementation of the extended producer responsibility, the Commission will conduct an updated study of costs and its potential impacts on concerned sectors.

    In addition, the Commission will continue to support Member States in the pragmatic design of national systems with a view to avoiding unexpected or unintended consequences, in particular for the availability and affordability of medicines.

    • [1] Directive (EU) 2024/3019 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2024 concerning urban wastewater treatment (recast), OJ L, 2024/3019, 12.12.2024.
    • [2] https://environment.ec.europa.eu/economy-and-finance/ensuring-polluters-pay_en.
    • [3] https://www.eca.europa.eu/en/publications/SR21_12.
    • [4] Article 1 of Directive (EU) 2024/3019.
    • [5] Impact assessment accompanying the proposal for a directive concerning urban wastewater treatment (recast): https://environment.ec.europa.eu/publications/proposal-revised-urban-wastewater-treatment-directive_en.
    • [6] Ibid.
    • [7] https://commission.europa.eu/topics/environment/water-resilience-strategy_en.
    Last updated: 27 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Planned antimony mining in Chios and compliance with European environmental legislation – E-001718/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    Although the project is still in a planning phase, it is essential to ensure that all necessary assessments and evaluations are conducted to determine its potential impacts on the environment and local communities.

    According to Article 4 of the Environmental Impact Assessment Directive[1], prior to granting a consent for such projects, it is up to Member States to determine whether an environmental impact assessment is necessary, based on a case-by-case analysis or by setting specific criteria (such as the location, size or type of project).

    Such an assessment, if required, needs to take into account the impacts of the projects on cultural heritage and the environmental aspects as well as the opinion of the local community concerned.

    In case a project impacts a Natura 2000 site, Article 6(3) of the Habitats Directive[2] applies[3].

    Projects should be planned and implemented covering all aspects of sustainability[4], including ensuring environmental protection and the prevention and minimisation of adverse social or health effects.

    Without prejudice to the Commission’s role as guardian of the Treaties, Member States are primarily responsible for ensuring compliance with EU law.

    In line with its strategic approach on enforcement action[5], which focuses on cases of systemic non-compliance, the Commission considers that the means of redress available under national legislation would be the most appropriate mechanism to address individual cases of possible non-compliance.

    • [1] Environmental Impact Assessment Directive 2011/92/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment, OJ L 26, 28.1.2012, p. 1-21, as amended by Directive 2014/52/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014, OJ L 124, 25.4.2014, p. 1-18.
    • [2] Council Directive 92/43/EEC on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora, OJ L 206, 22.7.1992, p. 7-50.
    • [3] Article 6(3) requires that any plan or project likely to significantly impact the site, individually or combined with others, undergo an appropriate assessment of its implications, considering the site’s conservation objectives, and can only be approved if it does not adversely affect the site’s integrity. Exceptions are allowed under Article 6(4)’s conditions.
    • [4] As highlighted in the Commission’s publication ‘EU principles for sustainable raw materials https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/23e4b6a0-41da-11ec-89db-01aa75ed71a1/language-en.
    • [5] As set out in the communication of 19 January 2017 (EU law: Better results through better application — C/2016/8600, OJ C 18, 19.1.2017, p. 10-20) and in the communication of 13 October 2022 COM(2022) 518 final — Enforcing EU law for a Europe that delivers.
    Last updated: 27 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Briefing – A new Culture Compass for Europe – 27-06-2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Europe’s culture and cultural heritage are fundamental to EU values and identity, providing space for discussion, engagement and debate. Culture also fosters a European sense of belonging and social cohesion, strengthens communities, and drives innovation and economic competitiveness. The New European Agenda for Culture, which has provided a framework for EU cultural policy since 2018, has become outdated in light of the significant challenges currently facing culture. To address this gap, the priorities of the Commissioner for Intergenerational Fairness, Youth, Culture and Sport, Glenn Micallef, include the development of an overarching, coherent and ambitious strategic framework for culture. This framework, called a new Culture Compass for Europe, is expected to provide long-term direction for diverse cultural aspects in EU policymaking and to ensure that culture becomes more accessible to all. The Culture Compass can be seen as a new policy approach that places culture at the centre of EU policies, serving as a driver for democracy, security, competitiveness, societal resilience, innovation and international partnerships. The European Parliament has played a crucial role in advancing discussions on culture at the EU level. Parliament has called on the Commission to strengthen EU support for building more crisis-resilient creative and cultural sectors and to provide adequate funding for EU-wide programmes promoting culture.

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Kustoff, TN Delegation Introduce Resolution to Honor FedEx Founder Frederick W. Smith

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative David Kustoff (TN-08)

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — Today, Congressman David Kustoff (R-TN) and the entire Tennessee House Delegation introduced a Resolution in the House of Representatives to honor the founder, chairman, and CEO of FedEx Corporation, Frederick W. Smith. 

    “I am pleased to introduce this Resolution to honor the Founder of FedEx, Fred Smith, in the House of Representatives,” said Congressman Kustoff. “Under his leadership, FedEx grew into a global enterprise: revolutionizing international supply chains, transforming how businesses operate, and changing how people connect. However, he will be remembered as not just a titan of industry, but as a lifelong Memphian who dedicated his life to giving back to his community. With this Resolution, we honor and celebrate Fred’s lifetime of inspiring service and leadership.”

    The Resolution was cosponsored by Reps. Diana Harshbarger (TN-01), Tim Burchett (TN-02), Chuck Fleischmann (TN-03), Scott DesJarlais (TN-04), Andy Ogles (TN-05), John Rose (TN-06), Mark Green (TN-07), and Steve Cohen (TN-09).
     

    Click here to read the full text of the resolution. 

     

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News –