Category: Economy

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Study finds UK adults aren’t connected to nature

    Source: Anglia Ruskin University

    Published: 25 October 2024 at 13:05

    New research led by ARU finds barriers prevent everyone enjoying nature equally

    New research indicates that UK adults experience less of a connection with nature than adults from most other countries, ranking 59th out of 65 national groups surveyed.

    The study, which includes data from 56,968 adults aged between 18 and 99, also found that levels of connection with nature are associated with several socioeconomic and demographic factors across countries.

    Led by Professor Viren Swami of Anglia Ruskin University (ARU), the study involved over 250 academics from over 60 countries and is published in the Journal of Environmental Psychology.

    The UK was ranked 59th out of 65 on the Connectedness to Nature Scale, which asks participants to rate statements, such as “I often feel a sense of oneness with the natural world around me”, “I have a deep understanding of how my actions affect the natural world”, and “I often feel part of the web of life”.

    Data for some countries was separated into different languages – for example English and French responses from Canada – providing 65 national groups. Nepal, Iran, and South Africa were the top three nations, while Israel (63rd), Japan (64th), and Spain (65th) were at the bottom of the rankings.

    The UK scored better on the Nature Exposure Scale, which measures people’s contact with nature around their home and work, their recreational visits, and their nature awareness.

    Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, and Lithuania were the leading three countries, with the top 10 nations on the Nature Exposure Scale all European, with the exception of French-speaking Canadians. The UK was 31st out of 65, and the bottom three nations were Lebanon, South Korea and, finally, Brazil.

    Across all nations, the study found that women reported both higher nature connectedness and greater nature exposure than men, consistent with previous research showing that women overall tend to have greater environmental concern and empathy with nature. Both connectedness to nature and nature exposure scores also increased with age, which is possibly linked to older adults having more time and opportunities to engage with nature.

    Taking results from the two measures together, greater nature exposure and connectedness to nature scores were both linked to socioeconomic factors. Higher scores were significantly associated with greater financial security, living in a rural location, a higher level of education, being in a committed relationship, and being in a racial majority in that particular country. 

    Lead author Viren Swami, Professor of Social Psychology at Anglia Ruskin University (ARU), said:

    “Spending time in a natural environment can provide a number of really important benefits. 

    “My previous research has shown how being in green spaces, ‘blue’ environments, such as by rivers or the coast, and even snowy landscapes can improve different facets of psychological well-being and mental health, and of course there are physical health benefits from spending time outdoors in nature.

    “The evidence that being in nature is good for you is undeniable, but crucially this new study shows that exposure to nature and levels of connectedness to nature are not enjoyed equally by different nations or across different social groups.

    “The significant associations with financial wealth, being better educated, and being part of the racial majority within a particular country reflects known socioeconomic inequities in terms of lack of access to natural environments. Racial minorities may also experience natural environments differently, for example in terms of a sense of belonging, and this can impact on people’s attitude to nature and their desire to access it.

    “Unfortunately, barriers to accessing nature exist in countries across the world and it is important these barriers are broken down to allow people from all backgrounds to access and enjoy the benefits of natural spaces.”

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Dmitry Chernyshenko: Universities participating in the Priority 2030 program have concluded over 6,000 contracts worth 62 billion rubles with industrial partners

    Translation. Region: Russian Federation –

    Source: Government of the Russian Federation – An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.

    Previous news Next news

    Dmitry Chernyshenko visited Ulyanovsk State University – a participant of the Priority-2030 program

    Universities participating in the Priority 2030 program have concluded more than 6,000 contracts worth 62 billion rubles with industrial partners. This was reported by Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Chernyshenko, commenting on the implementation of the largest program for the development of Russian universities.

    “Universities participating in the Priority 2030 program have actively joined in solving problems aimed at ensuring our country’s technological leadership, one of the national goals outlined by President Vladimir Putin. Thus, they are building and strengthening partnerships with enterprises in the real sector. Over two and a half years, more than 420 consortiums have been created within the program, uniting universities, research organizations, and businesses. More than 6,000 agreements have been concluded with industrial partners for a total of more than 62 billion rubles. This joint work is aimed at conducting research, creating new technologies and products, and improving production processes,” the Deputy Prime Minister said.

    Examples of the consortium’s successful work include a joint project of MSTU Stankin, the A.A. Blagonravov Institute of Mechanical Engineering of the Russian Academy of Sciences, the V.A. Trapeznikov Institute of Control Sciences of the Russian Academy of Sciences, the Professor N.E. Zhukovsky Central Aerohydrodynamic Institute, SPbGMTU, Roscosmos State Corporation, Rosneft Oil Company, Shvabe, Mil and Kamov Scientific and Production Center, Technological Center, and USC. Together, the university, research institutes, and businesses are working to create and implement technologies in mechanical engineering.

    The most important task of Priority 2030 is to train highly qualified personnel to meet economic demands, noted the head of the Russian Ministry of Education and Science, Valery Falkov.

    “Within the framework of Priority 2030, network programs are actively developing, which imply the organization of training using the resources of several universities, with the participation of representatives of the real sector of the economy. This is an effective tool for improving the quality of training specialists in the regions. Since 2021, more than 380 network educational programs have been operating,” he said.

    As an example of such work, the Minister cited the program of the Transbaikal State University and the Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, which jointly train personnel for the mining industry. Students undergo practical training at the facilities of one of the country’s leading gold mining companies, Highland Gold, which was the initiator and partner of the track.

    Another successful example is the first program for artificial intelligence researchers in Russia, which was launched this year, combining the expertise of four of the strongest universities and the experience of high-tech companies. We are talking about the course prepared by ITMO, MIPT, HSE and Innopolis University together with Yandex and Sber. Its main difference is its focus on developing new fundamental models, architecture and machine learning algorithms. In the future, these guys will be at the forefront of new technologies.

    Also, within the framework of the Priority-2030 program, over 500 laboratories equipped with modern full-cycle equipment have been created to train strong specialists. For example, the St. Petersburg State University of Aerospace Instrumentation has an aerospace micromechanics laboratory, which trains students in the field of design and testing of micromechanical devices that solve aerospace navigation problems. The equipment can be used to carry out research and development work at the request of industrial partners.

    Universities participating in Priority 2030 are talking about some of their developments at the PriorityFest2024 festival, which is taking place on October 24–25 at MGIMO.

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Security: Windsor Mill Woman Sentenced To Over Five Years’ Imprisonment In Connection With Conspiracy Involving Fraudulently Obtaining And Attempting To Obtain More Than $3 Million In Covid-19 Cares Act Loans

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    Glenn Used COVID-19 CARES Act Funds to Pay for a Vacation to Jamaica, a Mercedes-Benz, Luxury Jewelry, including a 31 Carat Diamond Necklace and items from Luis Vuitton, Neiman Marcus, Dior, Cartier, Gucci, Chanel and Hermes.

    Baltimore, Maryland – On October 23, 2024, Tomeka Glenn, a/k/a “Tomeka Harris” and “Tomeka Davis,” age 47, of Windsor Mill, Maryland, was sentenced by United States District Judge Richard D. Bennett to 65 months’ imprisonment and 3 years of supervised release in connection with her conviction on conspiracy to commit wire fraud relating to the submission of millions of dollars in fraudulent COVID-19 CARES Act Paycheck Protection Program and Economic Injury Disaster Loan applications.  Judge Bennett also directed Glenn to pay restitution in the amount of $3,016,275.62.

    Glenn’s co-defendant Kevin Davis, age 43, also of Windsor Mill, Maryland, pleaded guilty on January 25, 2024 to being a felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition.  Judge Bennett on May 22, 2024 sentenced him to 24 months’ imprisonment.

    The sentence was announced by Erek L. Barron, U.S. Attorney for the District of Maryland; Special Agent in Charge William J. Delbagno of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) Baltimore Field Office; and Chief Robert McCullough of the Baltimore County Police Department.

    Financial assistance offered through the CARES Act included forgivable loans to small businesses for job retention and certain other expenses through the Paycheck Protection Program, administered through the Small Business Administration (“SBA”).  The SBA also offered an Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) and/or an EIDL advance to help businesses meet their financial obligations.  An EIDL advance did not have to be repaid, and small businesses could receive an advance, even if they were not approved for an EIDL loan. The maximum advance amount was $10,000.

    According to Glenn’s plea agreement, beginning in June 2020 and continuing through March 2021,  Glenn and various co-conspirators prepared numerous false and fraudulent EIDL and PPP loan applications for various businesses (including some that did not exist in any legitimate capacity)  that included false information concerning, among other things, number of employees, monthly payroll costs, and revenue.  The PPP applications also routinely included false and fraudulent Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) tax forms and bank statements, which were submitted by Glenn to substantiate the false representations made in the applications. 

    Glenn admitted that she received kickback payments from the loan borrowers in exchange for her assistance in connection with the submission of fraudulent PPP and EIDL applications, ultimately receiving more than $400,000 in kickbacks in connection with the scheme.  These kickbacks typically amounted to 10% to 20% of the loan amount.  In total, the kickback scheme resulted in the disbursement of at least $2,715,649.12 in fraudulently obtained PPP and EIDL funds in connection with 23 fraudulent PPP and EIDL loans.

    According to Glenn’s plea agreement, Glenn and Davis, received $300,726.50 in PPP/EIDL funds for various entities that they controlled, and Glenn attempted to obtain $601,511.20 in additional fraudulent PPP and EIDL funds too. 

    Glenn used the fraudulently obtained funds to pay for a luxury vacation at a resort in Jamaica, to purchase a 2021 Mercedes-Benz S580 sedan valued at $148,171.60, to buy thousands of dollars in luxury jewelry, as well as numerous other luxury goods, including items from Luis Vuitton, Neiman Marcus, Dior, Cartier, Gucci, Chanel, and Hermes.

    At the time of her scheme, neither Glenn nor Davis had any legitimate source of income, and in May 2020, each applied for unemployment insurance benefits in the State of Maryland.  In addition, as detailed in Davis and Glenn’s plea agreements, on January 6, 2023, law enforcement executed a federal search warrant at their residence.  Davis and Glenn were present at the residence at the time of the search and were arrested in connection with the fraudulent COVID-19 CARES Act loans.  According to Davis’s plea agreement, during the execution of the search warrant, law enforcement found and seized four firearms loaded with ammunition—a 9mm firearm, and three .40 caliber firearms.  Later investigation revealed that  one of the .40 caliber firearms had earlier been reported stolen by its owner.  As further detailed in Davis’s plea, the firearms were hidden by Davis in the air ducts of the residence: two firearms were hidden in the main bedroom air duct where Davis slept and kept his personal effects; the other two firearms were in the air duct of the bathroom closets to the main bedroom.  Moreover, two of the firearms were further stuffed in socks in an attempt to hide them.  Davis admitted that he possessed and secreted the firearms in the air ducts of his home (and in the socks) in an attempt to conceal them from law enforcement after learning that federal agents had a warrant to search his home.  As admitted to at his plea, Davis’s concealment of the firearms constitutes attempted obstruction of the administration of justice with respect to the investigation.  Each of the four firearms recovered from Davis’s home on January 6, 2023 were later found to have his DNA on them.  A later review of Davis’s iCloud account revealed the existence of, among other things, a series of videos depicting Davis handling firearms, including a shotgun and an assault rifle.  Davis knew that his previous felony conviction prohibited him from possessing firearms or ammunition.

    As part of their plea agreements, Glenn and Davis will be required to forfeit their interest in any assets derived from or obtained by them as a result of, or used to facilitate the commission of, their illegal activities. Specifically, Glenn is required to forfeit a money judgment in the amount of at least $700,726.50; the 2021 Mercedes-Benz; cash in bank accounts she controlled that were held in the names of business entities; and jewelry, including her 3.03 carat yellow diamond engagement ring, Rolex, Cartier and Breitling watches, and a Diamond Miami Cuban Link Chain with 31.5 carats of VS1 diamonds.  Davis must forfeit the firearms and ammunition.

    The District of Maryland Strike Force is one of five strike forces established throughout the United States by the U.S. Department of Justice to investigate and prosecute COVID-19 fraud, including fraud relating to the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (“CARES”) Act.  The CARES Act was designed to provide emergency financial assistance to Americans suffering the economic effects caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.  The strike forces focus on large-scale, multi-state pandemic relief fraud perpetrated by criminal organizations and transnational actors.  The strike forces are interagency law enforcement efforts, using prosecutor-led and data analyst-driven teams designed to identify and bring to justice those who stole pandemic relief funds.

    For more information on the Department’s response to the pandemic, please visit https://www.justice.gov/coronavirus.  Anyone with information about allegations of attempted fraud involving COVID-19 can report it by calling the Department of Justice’s National Center for Disaster Fraud (NCDF) Hotline at 866-720-5721 or via the NCDF Web Complaint Form at: https://www.justice.gov/disaster-fraud/ncdf-disaster-complaint-form.

    U.S. Attorney Barron commended the FBI, the SBA-OIG, and the Baltimore County Police Department for their work in the investigation.  Mr. Barron thanked Assistant U.S. Attorney Paul A. Riley, who is prosecuting the case.  He also recognized the assistance of the Maryland COVID-19 Strike Force Paralegal Specialist Joanna B.N. Huber and Paralegal Specialist Juliette Jarman. 

    For more information on the Maryland U.S. Attorney’s Office, its priorities, and resources available to help the community, please visit www.justice.gov/usao/md.

    # # #

     

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI: The Nugget Trap (RWA) Token Offering NGTG$$ commences trading

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    HOUSTON, Oct. 25, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Houston Natural Resources Corp (OTC:HNRC) portfolio company Cunningham Mining Ltd announced today the launch of its Nugget Trap Token (NGTG$$) offering on the Biconomy Exchange (www.biconomy.com) (https://bit.ly/4feDNbx).

    The company intends to list the token on a number of other exchanges. This innovative tokenization initiative aims to revolutionize the mining sector by providing a new financing model for mining operations by leveraging the assets.

    Cunningham Mining Ltd (“CML”) has entered into a definitive arrangement agreement with American Creek Resources Ltd (“American Creek”) pursuant to which CML has agreed to acquire all of the issued and outstanding common shares of American Creek at a price of USD $0.31per Share in an arm’s-length, all-cash transaction valued at approximately USD $150 million on a fully diluted basis. The transaction will be completed by way of a statutory plan of arrangement under the Business Corporations Act (British Columbia) (https://bit.ly/4fgq5oD).

    GEM Digital Limited has provided CML an investment commitment for up to USD $336 million. This substantial financial backing is set to fuel CML’s ambitious expansion plans, including the proposed acquisition of American Creek Resources Ltd and future gold property acquisitions. The enhanced token subscription facility will be available to Cunningham Mining for a 36-month term following the listing of the Cunningham Mining Token on a Centralized Exchange. This arrangement provides Cunningham Mining with considerable flexibility, as the company retains control over the timing and maximum amount of drawdowns, without any minimum drawdown obligations (https://bit.ly/3BYSfGm).

    HNRC owns 9% of Cunningham Mining Ltd and is expected to provide HNRC shareholders with a significant increase in its asset base and a liquidity event in the fourth quarter.

    Real World Asset (RWA) tokens, such as the Nugget Trap Token, provide a groundbreaking opportunity for investors to gain ownership of tangible assets from the mining industry. By digitizing commodities like precious metals and minerals, these tokens offer a unique combination of stability and growth potential. With this potential in digital friendly economy, investors can capitalize on market fluctuations, offering both flexibility and potential RWA tokens as they gain popularity, and they are attracting a broader, more diversified audience.

    Key Highlights:

    • Issuance Size: 100,000,000 units for proceeds of $60M USD
    • Token Offering Price: $0.60 USD per Nugget Trap Token (NGTG$$)
    • Purpose: To provide liquidity and financing options for mining operations through tokenization
    • Backing: The NGT token is backed by the Placer Claim in-ground assets, including potential gold deposits and physical gold in the BC Golden Triangle of the Nugget Trap Placer Claim

    Special Attachment: Spot Gold Price Feature

    In conjunction with the Nugget Trap Token offering, Cunningham Mining Ltd is pleased to provide a special attachment related to the current spot gold price. This attachment will offer insights into the gold market trends and how they impact the value of the Nugget Trap Token. Token holders are required to hold for six months to activate the embedded offer.

    Digital Asset: Nugget Trap Gold Placer Claim

    The Nugget Trap Token is at the forefront of this paradigm shift, transforming how stakeholders engage with real-world assets. Backed by solid industry fundamentals, it represents an exciting innovation in the digitization of physical assets, making the mining industry more transparent, efficient, and accessible. As blockchain technology continues to revolutionize industries, RWA tokens are reshaping the investment landscape, offering a compelling blend of real-world asset ownership and cutting-edge financial innovation to monetize their in-ground assets effectively. This tokenization model not only provides liquidity but also offers tangible value to token holders.

    About Cunningham Mining Ltd

    Cunningham Mining (www.cunninghammining.com) has successfully completed the acquisition of the Placer Claims known as the “Nugget Trap Placer Mine” in the British Columbia Mineral Title registry, covering 573.7 acres, along with the accompanying permits and authorizations (“Property”). The Property is situated within the Skeena Mining Division of British Columbia, Canada, in the area known as BC’s Golden Triangle. The company intends to digitize its claims through the issuance of Digital Asset Tokens.

    About Houston Natural Resources Corp

    Houston Natural Resources Corp. (OTC: HNRC) (www.hnrcholdings.com) stands as a versatile energy enterprise with stakes in both oil and gas. Notably, the company has successfully obtained full ownership, a 100% interest, in Cunningham Energy LLC, boasting appraised reserves totaling $352 million. Additionally, Houston Natural Resources Corp. holds minority investments in Rhino Energy Ltd, CE Energy Sponsors, LLC, and HNR Acquisition Corp. Demonstrating a commitment to growth, the company remains proactive in its pursuit of new opportunities within the energy and energy transitions sectors, all with the overarching goal of delivering enhanced value to its shareholders.

    FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS:

    This press release may contain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Statements other than statements of historical facts included in this press release may constitute forward-looking statements and are not guarantees of future performance or results and involve a number of risks and uncertainties.

    Contact:

    Houston Natural Resources Corp
    12 Greenway Plaza, Suite 1100
    Houston, Texas 77046
    Phone: (713) 425-4901
    E-mail: frank@hnrcholdings.com  
    Website: www.hnrcholdings.com
    Twitter: https://twitter.com/CunninghamCorp

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Economics: How To Do Better

    Source: International Monetary Fund

    Speech by IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva at the 2024 Annual Meetings Plenary

    October 25, 2024

    As prepared for delivery

    Thank you, Governor Munawar, and a very good morning to all!

    It is my privilege to address you on behalf of the talented and dedicated staff of the IMF—and to do so alongside Ajay Banga, who has been a great partner since he started in his job. Ajay, I cannot stress enough how much I admire your leadership of the World Bank and value our partnership—the two of us, as well as between our institutions!

    Let me start with some good news: inflation is in retreat. From 5.7 percent in the fourth quarter of last year, our World Economic Outlook sees global inflation falling to 5.3 percent in the current quarter and further to 3.5 percent in Q4 2025—with a faster decline in advanced economies. Tight monetary policies have worked without breaking the back of the global economy. Big sense of relief.

    But not yet time for celebration—including because, even if inflation is coming down, the new and higher price level is here to stay. Families are hurting.

    And, looking ahead, the world now faces a low growth – high debt trajectory:

    • We project world GDP to grow at an anemic average rate of 3.2 percent per year over the next five years—just look at how our forecasts have been revised lower and lower over the years.
    • At the same time, we forecast global public debt to keep rising—with a risk that it could exceed our baseline projection by as much as 20 percent of world GDP in a severe but plausible negative scenario. A hundred trillion dollars in government debt worldwide. Higher interest payments eating up a growing slice of fiscal revenues, especially in low-income and emerging market countries. All of this as spending pressures pile up.

    Spending priorities include outlays related to climate and demography and, in emerging market and low-income countries, investment to close development gaps. By 2030, IMF research sees these spending pressures adding some 7 percent of GDP to annual expenditure in advanced economies, 9 percent of GDP in emerging markets, and 14 percent in low-income developing countries.

    To make matters worse, the world is fracturing, and trade is no longer the powerful engine of growth that it used to be. The retreat from global economic integration—driven by both national security concerns and the anger of those who lost out from it—is visible in a mushrooming of industrial policy measures, trade barriers, and protectionism.

    There is much work to do.

    My message to our members is this: first, shift toward rebuilding fiscal buffers; second, invest in growth-enhancing reforms; and third, work together to tackle global challenges.

    With monetary policy easing, fiscal consolidation should start now. Credibility requires persuasive communication with the public. Multi-year fiscal plans should lay out consolidation paths tailored to country-specific situations.

    This is not easy. Governments face a dilemma—more accurately, a “trilemma”—of large spending needs, political redlines on taxation, and the need to rebuild buffers.

    Domestic revenue mobilization will be critical for many countries to square this circle. Growth-enhancing investments, notably in climate and technology, must be protected. And consolidation should be designed so it does not come at the expense of social protection and jobs.

    The IMF can help. Take for instance the case of Jamaica, where the government secured public support for a carefully designed package of revenue and expenditure reforms that protected public investment and social spending yet still succeeded in almost halving debt between 2012 and 2022. More than 20 countries have been able to boost their tax revenues by over 5 percent of GDP in the past three decades. There are many good examples.

    In parallel with fiscal consolidation, countries must launch ambitious reforms to lift their growth potential. Higher growth not only helps creates well-paid jobs but also eases the fiscal trilemma by generating higher tax revenues.

    These reforms span labor-market measures such as skills enhancement and job matching, product-market measures to cut red tape and mobilize savings, and specific measures to foster innovation and raise productivity. In the advanced economies, venture capital and capital market integration are key priorities; elsewhere, the focus needs to include steps to improve governance and institutions.

    Real progress is possible. A new IMF study shows that reforms are best developed through two-way dialogue with the public, with measures to mitigate the impact on those who risk losing out.

    But domestic policies will not be enough. To tackle today’s global challenges, we need—more than ever—cooperation andmultilateral action. The IMF and World Bank have a critical role to play here.

    Take the issue of debt. In countries on the edge of fiscal distress, proactive steps are needed to restore debt sustainability. The Fund has prioritized addressing debt vulnerabilities and enhancing debt resolution, with efforts that are now paying off. Already, the Common Framework has delivered milestone achievements for Ghana and Ethiopia—even if further efforts are needed to increase predictability and accelerate timelines in debt treatments.

    Progress has been underpinned by enhanced cooperation among stakeholders at the Global Sovereign Debt Roundtable, which has helped build consensus on technical issues.

    In today’s high-temperature geopolitical environment, we can’t take cooperation for granted. This is why everything we do at the Fund is about delivering value to our members, tailored to their needs.

    Our bilateral surveillance provides timely diagnostics and advice to help countries implement strong policies. During the pandemic, it was pivotal in helping countries assemble coordinated policy responses swiftly, despite high uncertainty.

    The focus of our regular consultations with member countries ranges from supporting institutional development in fragile and conflict-affected states, to capital flow management in emerging market economies, to advising on the details of interest rate policy in advanced economies. And we have deepened our analysis of the macroeconomic policy challenges posed by the green and digital transformations.

    Our multilateral surveillance then pulls it all together to extract cross-cutting lessons for all. Again, the goal is to ensure that problems are identified and addressed early. This is precisely what we do in our flagship reports: the World Economic Outlook, the Global Financial Stability Report, and the Fiscal Monitor.

    All of this is complemented by our capacity development work. We have fielded thousands of technical assistance missions in the last five years alone, transferring knowledge and creating a deep well of goodwill in the process.

    In short, we are the world’s essential transmission line for the sharing of country experiences across our membership.

    And then there is the Fund’s unique role as a lender at the center of the global financial safety net.

    We are the first responder in times of trouble. Countries know we are here to catch them if they fall—especially the poorest and most vulnerable.

    We have stepped up our lending to support reforms and help vulnerable countries address balance of payment needs and build resilience in the face of multiple shocks.

    Barbados and Benin, Cabo Verde and Costa Rica, Moldova and Morocco, Suriname and Sri Lanka, to name but a few—the list of recent IMF program successes is long.

    In the years since the onset of the pandemic, we have set records for both our total lending volume and the number of countries assisted, with the stock of concessional credit outstanding from our Poverty Reduction and Growth Trust tripling to $28 billion. And, in the less than three years since its launch, 20 countries have received long-term loans from our Resilience and Sustainability Trust, supporting policies to boost resilience to climate change.

    At the Fund we are currently exhibiting an artwork that captures our lending volumes over the decades in a beautifully visual way—the results are truly remarkable, please come and see for yourself!

    The 50 percent quota increase we agreed last year in Marrakesh, solidifies our lending capacity. We will build on these foundations by continuing to refine our toolkit. Strengthening the Fund’s lending role and precautionary credit facilities strengthens the global financial safety net. All countries stand to benefit—because less instability means the whole world does better, and because aggregating resources together is efficient.

    Fund support is essential for countries with a limited capacity to build international reserves—and doubly so given that five countries own more than half of the world’s total reserves, while many countries remain relatively unprotected.

    At the IMF, we have just had a great example of cooperation occurring on the very eve of these Annual Meetings. Reflecting years of strong net income, our Executive Board agreed a set of measures that will, first, safeguard the financial strength that underpins our support for our members; second, reduce charges and surcharges on our regular lending by an average of 36 percent; and, third, deliver a comprehensive reform and financing package that more than doubles our concessional lending capacity and places our support to low-income countries on a firm footing for years to come.

    Beyond the substance of these important reforms, let me highlight that we succeeded in securing unanimous support. Not a single member country objected.

    This did not “just happen”—we had to work very hard for it, and we iterated many times with our members to deliver a result that in the end worked for all.

    This is a lesson for the coming years. No matter how difficult the geopolitics may be, we can work to preserve the spirit of concrete, actionable cooperation. Countries rally not in idealism or charity but out of enlightened self-interest.

    To do our job well we must strive for inclusivity. In this spirit I ask you all to please join me in warmly welcoming Prime Minister Daniel Risch and his team—they are here to represent our newest, 191st member: the Principality of Liechtenstein.

    We must also never stop striving for fair representation of the world we live in. Work is ongoing with our Board and the membership to develop, by June, possible approaches as a guide to better reflect members’ weight in the world economy, including through a new quota formula.

    Similarly, voice matters. I am delighted that on November 1 our Board will welcome a third Director for Sub-Saharan Africa, ensuring more voice for this region.

    Last but not least, cooperation does not happen in a vacuum. At the Fund, we rely on institutional strength and our excellent staff to do the work of supporting our member countries. Please join me in a round of applause for them!

    Let me close with an anecdote.

    This year being the 80th anniversary of the historic Bretton Woods conference, Ajay and I decided to go to our birthplace. We took a group of leading thinkers with us for two days of reflection. We went to draw inspiration from our founders: men who, even in the darkest days of total war, were able to shape a new world. And we understood: if Keynes and White could shine a light in a tunnel that dark, then clearly, our mission is to carry their torch.

    The skies over Bretton Woods were mostly dark and gloomy during those two days last month. But then—suddenly—the sun broke through, and Mother Nature gifted us a gorgeous double rainbow. Set against the turning foliage of Mount Washington in the Fall, it was just spectacular. There is no other way to put it.

    To us, that was a great omen—and a reminder that the sun is always there, it is only the clouds that come and go. Our founders have left us a legacy to see through darker times. And so we will—because we know it can be done.

    Thank you!

    IMF Communications Department
    MEDIA RELATIONS

    PRESS OFFICER:

    Phone: +1 202 623-7100Email: MEDIA@IMF.org

    @IMFSpokesperson

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI Economics: 2024 Annual Meetings – Address by the Chair of the Boards of Governors

    Source: International Monetary Fund

    H.E. Ahmed Munawar
    Governor of the Maldives Monetary Authority

    October 25, 2024

    بسم الله الرّحمن الرّحيم

    As-alam-alaikum and a very good morning

    It is a great honor to welcome you to the 2024 Plenary of the Boards of Governors of the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank Group.

    A warm welcome to the Managing Director of the IMF Kristalina Georgieva and the President of the World Bank Group Ajay Banga. Congratulations Ms. Georgieva, on commencing your second term as the MD.

    This year is special. We are celebrating the 80th anniversary of the Bretton Woods Institutions—a major milestone in the history of global economic governance. I would like to reflect on the words of the first Annual Meetings Chair of the Boards of Governors, U.S. Treasury Secretary, John W. Snyder: “In joining the Fund and Bank, our respective governments have not only invested large sums of money, but they have in a considerable measure staked their economic destinies on the success of these institutions. We must not fail our governments and, above all, the hopeful people we represent.”

    These words hold true today, as they did 80 years ago. For 80 years, the IMF and World Bank have remained beacons of hope, managing global crises from wars to pandemics. Even in tough times, we find resilience. Chairing the Board of Governors in this historic meeting by a small state like mine is a sign of the inclusivity of these institutions.

    Despite tighter financial conditions and rising geopolitical tensions, the global economy is showing remarkable strength. A soft landing is within reach. Inflation is moderating. Yet, we cannot become complacent. Uncertainty remains high. Ongoing conflicts and upheavals in many parts of the world cast a shadow over our progress, and further escalations would have a much larger impact on vulnerable economies, including through higher commodity prices.

    It is true that significant challenges remain, and I would like to highlight three such challenges.

    Firstly, climate change. Small countries like the Maldives, are on the front lines of climate change. The Maldives aims to have 33% of its electricity from renewable sources by 2028. This transition will build climate resilience and deliver significant fiscal and foreign exchange savings. Achieving the target requires around 1.3 billion dollars to upgrade power infrastructure, of which only 13% has been pledged by donors so far. Small Island Developing States (SIDS) like the Maldives call on international financial institutions to provide easier and affordable climate finance for adaptation and mitigation on the principles of a just energy transition. While the IMF’s Resilience and Sustainability Fund and the World Bank’s record 42.6 billion dollars in fiscal year 2024 in climate finance are commendable. More is needed, especially for climate vulnerable SIDS. Additionally, we must innovatively rethink and implement strategies to mobilize private sector investments.

    Secondly, debt sustainability. Over two-thirds of emerging markets and developing economies are at high risk of debt distress. While the Global Sovereign Debt Roundtable has encouraged collaboration, more action is needed. Debt sustainability analysis must better account for country context, and the ongoing review of the Debt Sustainability Framework for Low-Income Countries should look at the specific needs of SIDS. The IMF, World Bank, and MDBs should take bold steps to support countries in debt distress. MDBs can also create tools like debt-for-climate swaps, exchanging debt relief for climate adaptation investments.

    Finally,structural reforms. We must strengthen the productive and state capacities of emerging and developing economies. The Bretton Woods Institutions should focus more on job creation, equal opportunities, economic diversification, and the impact of refugee flows. Similarly, structural reforms must be socially acceptable, ensuring benefits are widely shared.

    Over the past year, the IMF and World Bank have undertaken significant initiatives to support our members. The completion of the 16th General Review of Quotas, the IDA21 Replenishment, and discussions on quota realignment and strengthening World Bank Group’s financing will help ensure that these institutions remain adequately resourced. At the same time, let us not lose sight of the importance of providing adequate access and representation to the countries which need MDB support the most, as well as ensuring evenhanded treatment across the membership.

    The review of the IMF’s Poverty Reduction and Growth Trust, Charges and Surcharge Policy together with the World Bank’s IDA21 Replenishment demonstrate support for our most vulnerable nations.

    As I reflect on the discussions I have had during these Annual Meetings, one theme has emerged strongly: the critical need for multilateral cooperation. My friends, collective action is the antidote to an increasingly fragmented world. The 80th anniversary of the Bretton Woods Institutions provides a moment to reflect on our achievements, and plan for a better future together. Let me extend a warm welcome to Liechtenstein, which earlier this week joined the IMF as its hundred and ninety-first member, further reinforcing the importance of multilateralism. I am pleased with addition of the 25th Chair at the IMF’s Executive Board for Sub-Saharan Africa, and urge my fellow Governors to champion gender diversity and equality.

    As the Bretton Woods Institutions plan for the future, they should tailor their advice and activities to meet the specific needs and capacities of each member. If we fail to do this, we fail the people we represent, as the first Annual Meetings Chair, John Snyder, wisely reminded us 80 years ago. As I conclude, let us remind ourselves of our unwavering commitment to macroeconomic stability, prosperity, and cooperation.

    Thank you.

    IMF Communications Department
    MEDIA RELATIONS

    PRESS OFFICER:

    Phone: +1 202 623-7100Email: MEDIA@IMF.org

    @IMFSpokesperson

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Africa Day : Celebrating African Excellence

    Source: Universities – Science Po in English

    On October 3rd, Sciences Po hosted a major event celebrating Africa’s rich heritage and vibrant innovations. On the occasion of the Francophonie Summit and in partnership with the French-African Foundation, AFRICA Day gathered 600 participants to imagine a future where African excellence shines on the global stage.

    The day began at the Élysée Palace, where the next generation of African leaders engaged in a discussion with French President Emmanuel Macron. Following this, Arancha Gonzalez, Dean of the Paris School of International Affairs (PSIA), and founding partner Nachouat Meghouar, Director General of the French-African Foundation, welcomed participants at Sciences Po and officially launched the first edition of the AFRICA Day which was supported by the French Ministry for Europe and Foreign Affairs, UM6P-Mohammed VI Polytechnic University, Jeune Afrique magazine, Concerto, OCP Group, and Boston Consulting Group.

    Throughout the day and in over 15 sessions, participants had the privilege to directly engage with more than 40 speakers and influential leaders from the continent on topics related to economics and finance, technology, development, climate change, security, entrepreneurship and creative industries. Further program details can be found at theafricaday.com.

    For the final plenary session, Mohamed Ould El Ghazouani, the President of the Islamic Republic of Mauritania and Chairperson of the African Union, stressed how stability was necessary to Africa’s development and prosperity.

    The day concluded with a memorable concert by Congolese artist Fally Ipupa, bringing together students and partners in celebration of the diverse voices and vibrant culture of the African continent. 

    This successful event was made possible by the dedication and enthusiasm of our many student volunteers who made sure the day went smoothly. 

    AFRICA Day was also a demonstration of Sciences Po’s strong commitment to Africa. We are proud to be one of Europe’s universities with the most active network of partner institutions in Africa. We also offer many academic programs and research dedicated to the continent. PSIA notably offers targeted courses through the African Studies concentration.

    Sciences Po’s student and alumni communities are also enriched by some 700 students from 46 African countries and over 1,000 alumni in Africa. We are fortunate to benefit from an important partnership with the Mastercard Foundation Scholars Program, which provides Scholarship enabling students from the continent to join Sciences Po’s graduate programmes

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Security: Georgia Woman Sentenced to 12 Years in Prison for $30M COVID-19 Unemployment Fraud Scheme and Firearms Charge

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    A Georgia woman was sentenced yesterday for her role in a scheme to defraud the Georgia Department of Labor (GaDOL) out of tens of millions of dollars in benefits meant to assist unemployed individuals during the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Tyshion Nautese Hicks, 32, of Vienna, was sentenced to 12 years in prison, three years of supervised release, and ordered to pay restitution in an amount to be determined at a later date. Hicks’ total sentence includes a penalty of three consecutive years in prison, imposed yesterday in relation to a separate charge of illegal possession of a machine gun prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Georgia.

    According to court documents and evidence presented in court, from March 2020 through November 2022, Hicks and her co-conspirators caused more than 5,000 fraudulent unemployment insurance (UI) claims to be filed with the GaDOL, resulting in at least $30 million in stolen benefits.

    “In one of the largest COVID fraud schemes ever prosecuted, the defendant and her coconspirators filed more than 5,000 fraudulent COVID unemployment insurance claims using stolen identities and unlawfully obtained more than $30 million in benefits,” said Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Nicole M. Argentieri, head of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division. “In doing so, the defendant and her co-conspirators exploited a program designed to alleviate pandemic-related economic hardship to enrich themselves at the expense of federal taxpayers. Yesterday’s sentence underscores the department’s commitment to investigating and prosecuting those who steal from the public fisc.”

    To execute the scheme, Hicks and others created fictitious employers and fabricated lists of purported employees using personally identifiable information (PII) from thousands of identity theft victims and filed fraudulent unemployment insurance claims on the GaDOL website. The co-conspirators obtained PII for use in the scheme from a variety of sources, including by paying an employee of an Atlanta-area health care and hospital network to unlawfully obtain patients’ PII from the hospital’s databases, and by purchasing PII from other sources over the internet. Using victims’ PII, Hicks and her co-conspirators caused the stolen UI funds to be disbursed via prepaid debit cards mailed to addresses of their choice, many of which were in and around Cordele and Vienna. Hicks additionally paid a local U.S. Postal Service (USPS) carrier to unlawfully divert mail containing debit cards loaded with over $512,000 in fraud proceeds to her and coached another co-conspirator on how to create her own fictitious employer account via Facebook Messenger.

    In February, Hicks pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit mail fraud and one count of aggravated identity theft. Seven of Hicks’ co-conspirators have previously pleaded guilty or been sentenced in the investigation.

    “Tyshion Nautese Hicks and her co-conspirators used the stolen PII of unwitting victims to file numerous fraudulent claims for UI benefits with the Georgia Department of Labor,” said Special Agent in Charge Mathew Broadhurst of the U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Inspector General (DOL-OIG) Southeast Regional Office. “We will continue to work with our federal and state law enforcement partners to safeguard UI benefit programs for those who need them.”

    “The sentence received by the defendant is the outcome of IRS Criminal Investigation’s commitment to investigating and prosecuting those who attempt to defraud various agencies by filing fraudulent claims using another person’s identifying information,” said Special Agent in Charge Demetrius Hardeman of the IRS Criminal Investigation (IRS-CI) Atlanta Field Office.

    “Postal Inspectors will continue to work with our law enforcement partners to hold individuals accountable for engaging in fraudulent schemes to manipulate the COVID-19 program for their own financial gain,” said Inspector in Charge Tommy D. Coke of the U.S. Postal Inspection Service (USPIS) Atlanta Division. “The sentencing should serve as a deterrence and shows that this type of behavior will not be tolerated.”

    “Yesterday’s sentencing underlines our commitment to holding those who exploit federal relief programs for personal gain accountable,” said Special Agent in Charge Jonathan Ulrich of the USPS Office of Inspector General (USPS-OIG). “As proven in this case, our criminal investigators along with our law enforcement partners will work together and diligently pursue anyone who attempts to exploit programs created to help legitimate people and businesses affected by the global pandemic.”

    “Hicks chose to commit fraud, further depleting limited funds designated to help individuals struggling to survive during the pandemic,” said Special Agent in Charge Frederick D. Houston of the U.S. Secret Service (USSS) Atlanta Field Office. “She and her co-conspirators also stole the personally identifiable information, caring only about self-enrichment, not the lives adversely affected. This case signifies our commitment to protect citizens and businesses from fraud and identity theft. We will continue to work with our local, state, and federal law enforcement partners to prosecute those who abuse these programs.”

    “Homeland Security Investigations will aggressively pursue those who exploit unemployment benefits meant for those in need, ensuring that justice is served, and resources are preserved for legitimate claimants,” said Acting Special Agent in Charge Steven N. Schrank of the Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) Atlanta Office.

    “Yesterday’s sentencing sends a clear message that those committing fraud will be held accountable,” said Inspector General Joseph V. Cuffari of the Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General (DHS-OIG). “DHS-OIG and our law enforcement partners will continue to prioritize protecting our country from these kinds of schemes.”

    DOL-OIG, IRS-CI, USPS-OIG, USPIS, USSS, HSI, and DHS-OIG investigated the case.

    Trial Attorneys Lyndie Freeman, Siji Moore, Matthew Kahn, and Andrew Jaco of the Criminal Division’s Fraud Section prosecuted the fraud case.

    On May 17, 2021, Attorney General Merrick B. Garland established the COVID-19 Fraud Enforcement Task Force to marshal the resources of the Justice Department in partnership with agencies across government to enhance efforts to combat and prevent pandemic-related fraud. The Task Force bolsters efforts to investigate and prosecute the most culpable domestic and international criminal actors and assists agencies tasked with administering relief programs to prevent fraud by, augmenting and incorporating existing coordination mechanisms, identifying resources and techniques to uncover fraudulent actors and their schemes, and sharing and harnessing information and insights gained from prior enforcement efforts. For more information on the department’s response to the pandemic, please visit www.justice.gov/coronavirus.

    Anyone with information about allegations of attempted fraud involving COVID-19 can report it by calling the Justice Department’s National Center for Disaster Fraud (NCDF) Hotline via the NCDF Web Complaint Form at www.justice.gov/disaster-fraud/ncdf-disaster-complaint-form

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Global: The best horror movie you’ve never seen

    Source: The Conversation – USA – By Scott Malia, Associate Professor of Theatre, College of the Holy Cross

    In ‘Trick ‛r Treat,’ Sam wreaks havoc on characters who betray Halloween traditions. Legendary

    It’s scary movie season, a time when many people watch films about zombies, serial killers, werewolves, magic and mysterious monsters who are impossible to kill.

    However, as far as I know, there’s only one film that features all of those elements – and you’ve probably never seen it.

    Made in 2007, “Trick ‛r Treat” consists of four interconnected horror stories, each about 15 to 20 minutes long, that all take place on a single Halloween night.

    While characters from one story sometimes appear in other segments, the unifying force in the film is Sam, a mysterious creature wearing a burlap mask. He takes umbrage whenever a character disrespects a Halloween tradition, whether it’s by scaring away trick-or-treaters or blowing out a jack-o’-lantern before Halloween is over. Each meets a gruesome end.

    Horror buffs eventually discovered the film. Today, it’s hailed as a modern classic.

    ‘Trick ‛r Treat’ ended up forgoing a theatrical run.

    What went wrong?

    “Trick ‛r Treat” was produced by a major studio, Warner Bros. It featured A-list stars, such as Brian Cox and Oscar-winner Anna Paquin. It was produced by Bryan Singer, who was known for churning out hits such as “X-Men” and “The Usual Suspects.” And though its director, Mike Dougherty, was making his directorial debut, he had worked as a screenwriter on films such as “X2: X-Men United” and “Superman Returns.”

    Despite all of these credentials, the film’s theatrical release was delayed from fall 2007 to 2008. Then a theater run was canceled altogether, with Warner Bros. finally releasing it on video in 2009.

    The studio never gave an official reason for pulling the theatrical release; however, some critics have speculated that the box office success of the “Saw” franchise and Rob Zombie’s “Halloween” remake were factors.

    Other reports suggest that the film’s anthology format, its mixture of horror and comedy, and a plot featuring murdered children made it too hard a sell.

    Given the cost of marketing and promoting “Trick ‛r Treat” to a nationwide audience, perhaps the risk wasn’t worth it for a film with a relatively small US$5 million budget. Dougherty himself said these hang-ups constituted a “perfect storm”, suggesting that no one development sealed the film’s fate.

    Michael Dougherty’s film included a number of elements that became mainstays of the genre – he was just a bit early to the game.
    Robyn Beck/AFP via Getty Images

    Bypassing the box office

    As recently as a decade ago, films released directly to DVD were viewed as flops or cash grabs. In fact, there’s an entire subgenre called “mockbusters” – low-budget rip-offs of studio films, such as “Transmorphers,” which tried to piggyback the success of the “Transformers” franchise, and “Atlantic Rim,” which attempted to do the same for the 2013 blockbuster “Pacific Rim.”

    Then there are direct-to-video sequels meant to capitalize off hits. Disney made a lot of money in the late 1990s and early 2000s producing widely panned, direct-to-video animated features such as “The Return of Jafar” and “Pocahontas II: Journey to a New World.”

    But second lives for films that were initially snubbed or ignored are nothing new.

    The Boondock Saints” was briefly screened in a handful of theaters for a single week in 1999 before being dumped into the video market. Only then did viewers find it, and it became a cult favorite that eventually begat a sequel.

    The stigma of direct-to-video release has diminished over the past decade thanks to the rise of streaming, in which content made directly for home viewing can receive critical acclaim and attract subscribers.

    Actor Nicolas Cage has made a cottage industry of this format. While some have attributed his massive output in the past decade to his financial difficulties, Cage’s films “Joe” (2013), “Mandy” (2018) and “Pig” (2021) have all received critical acclaim, despite sometimes only running in a handful of theaters for a week before their release into streaming markets and video on demand.

    It’s this sort of tradition that led to the rediscovery of “Trick ‛r Treat.”

    Nicolas Cage attends the special screening of ‘Mandy’ in 2018.
    Paul Archuleta/FilmMagic via Getty Images.

    Hipster horror

    The appeal of “Trick ‛r Treat” is rooted in its subversion of horror tropes.

    For example, women and children, who’ve historically served as victims in the genre, have a lot more agency in Dougherty’s Halloween tale. In fact, the mysterious Sam was played by Quinn Lord, who was only 8 years old when the film was shot. In the film, the character’s origin, age and gender remain undefined since Sam is masked or covered in prosthetics for the entire film, blurring the line between human and monster.

    In addition, the film’s complex structure, which some speculated might have hurt its chances for commercial success, helped fuel the film’s critical praise. Dougherty called it “‘Pulp Fiction’ meets ‘Halloween,’” a nod to the interlocking structure of Quentin Tarantino’s breakout film and the setting of John Carpenter’s horror staple, which also unfolds over one Halloween night.

    It has become somewhat of a cliché to say that esteemed art, initially overlooked, was “ahead of its time.”

    Still, it would be fair to say that “Trick ‘r Treat” arrived on the cusp of what has been called a “horror renaissance” in the past 15 years. Directors like Jordan Peele, Ari Aster, Robert Eggers and Mike Flanagan have found critical and commercial success by branding themselves as horror auteurs.

    In addition, Peele and directors like Nia Dacosta, who helmed 2021’s “Candyman,” have opened up a brand of horror that deals with social issues and identity. Dougherty’s film also anticipated a trend of horror films with a darkly humorous streak, including Peele’s “Get Out” and David Gordon Green’s reimagined “Halloween” sequels.

    Despite the film’s rocky beginnings, “Trick ‛r Treat” received a belated theatrical release in 2022, which has spurred talk of a potential sequel.

    Dougherty even acknowledges that the film may owe its current popularity to its botched release. While some mainstream films disappear quickly, “Trick ‛r Treat” – currently streaming on Max – reappears every Halloween. Just like Sam.

    Scott Malia does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. The best horror movie you’ve never seen – https://theconversation.com/the-best-horror-movie-youve-never-seen-241528

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Small Community and Heritage Assets Grants Programme to support the city’s heritage

    Source: City of Stoke-on-Trent

    Stoke-on-Trent City Council has launched the Small Community Events and Heritage Assets Grants programme, to support local initiatives that enrich our city’s culture and history.

    The programme, which is funded through a UK Shared Prosperity Fund (UKSPF) grant, is aimed at community groups and heritage enthusiasts and will help secure the city’s heritage assets for future generations as the Centenary year approaches.

    Leader of the city council, Councillor Jane Ashworth, said: “This is a great opportunity for anybody who has a real appreciation for culture and heritage in our city. Community groups are the lifeblood of maintaining a city’s culture, as well as providing education for younger residents and offering innovative ideas to celebrate what our city has achieved and will achieve in the years to come.

    “Applications are now open, and we strongly encourage community groups with a real passion for their home city to get involved. Let us work together for this programme as a community to make Stoke-on-Trent an even more vibrant and culturally rich city than it already is.

    “As we approach our Centenary year it’s more important than ever for us to not only celebrate our rich cultural heritage but how we can preserve it for the future. You could even apply for some money to have a Centenary party.”

    There are two funding streams for successful applicants. The first of these is Small Community Events, which provides a small contribution towards community events. This grant is intended to cover the running costs of not-for-profit community events.

    The second funding stream, Small Heritage Asset Grants, allows applicants to request funding for any repair services, land surveys, and labour costs for restoring or tidying up historical landmarks or breathing new life into long-standing monuments.

    The values of these grants range from £500 to £5,000, which will cover 80 per cent of the total costs for a project, with applicants required to provide the remaining 20 per cent of contributions through revenue funding such as cash donations from online appeals, any associated expenses from hiring a function room or open space for an event, and volunteering time.

    All legally constituted organisations that are based within the boundaries of Stoke-on-Trent City Council can apply.

    Projects will be prioritised based on their alignment with local development strategies; complementing ongoing initiatives to support community and heritage groups in the area; providing a cost-effective opportunity; and encouraging collaboration between organisations sharing the same vision.

    The new grant comes as the city council is launching its ‘fit and proper person test’ to ensure heritage doesn’t fall into the wrong hands. The new ‘One Council’ approach will make sure heritage land and property is best managed to benefit the city, its communities, and residents.

    Councillor Alastair Watson, cabinet member for financial sustainability and corporate resources, said: “As the city council we are guardians of our heritage and this is a responsibility that we take very seriously. 

    “That’s why we’re working to protect our historic buildings and cultural heritage as well as creating opportunities for our communities to be able to access them, and use them, and protect them for future generations.”

    Applications for the Small Community Events and Heritage Assets Grants the must be completed by midnight on Wednesday 27 November 2024.

    If a project is approved, a grant payment will be made to the group manager upon submission of a claim form alongside proof of any project expenditures. After further approval by the programme team, the project lead will then receive their grant via an electronic payment.

    To request an application pack or for any other questions about the application process for this programme, please contact Angela Halls by emailing angela.halls@stoke.gov.uk.

    You can read more information about the Small Community and Heritage Assets Grant programme by visiting https://www.stoke.gov.uk/grants.

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Birmingham City Council calls for action over national £2.2 billion council housing budget black hole

    Source: City of Birmingham

    Birmingham City Council today urges government to act now on England’s “broken council housing finances”, including “unsustainable” levels of debt previously given to councils by government.

    It joins local authorities from across England calling for action ahead of next week’s Autumn Budget.

    A report this autumn – Securing the Future of Council Housing – backed by more than 100 councils, highlighted that our national council housing system is in crisis, with finances pushed to the brink by past national policy decisions.

    Today Birmingham City Council has signed a joint statement urging Government to help turn things round.

    “The new government’s commitment to a ‘council housing revolution’ is a huge step forward for communities across our country,” says the statement.

    “The Chancellor’s first Budget and spending review are a once-in-a- generation opportunity to fix England’s broken council housing finances.

    “The last government tore up its 2012 council housing settlement and left local government with a £2.2 billion black hole in housing budgets.

    “Our report urges the new government to turn this round, investing in urgently needed new council homes, addressing the unsustainable debt previously allocated to councils and creating a Green and Decent Homes Programme, so together we can deliver the more and better council homes and growth that communities up and down the country so desperately need.”

    Councillor Jayne Francis, Birmingham City Council’s Cabinet Member for Housing and Homelessness, said:

    “Council homes are so much more than bricks and mortar – they are a cornerstone of a better life.

    “But our country’s council housing is in crisis – policy decisions over the past decade have pushed finances to the brink and undermined the sustainability of the system. In Birmingham, the demand for accommodation has never been higher. Currently, Birmingham has around 25,000 people on the housing register seeking a home.

    “I see every day how council homes change lives for the better. Having a quality home to call your own gives people the stable platform they need to live a healthy life and to live it well. We want everyone in Birmingham to live in a warm, safe, sustainable home.

    “We’re calling for government to take this once-in-a-generation chance to fix England’s broken council housing finances, address unsustainable debt, and help us to make sure future generations in Birmingham have the council homes they need.”

    Securing the Future of Council Housing was supported by 109 councils across England, led by Southwark Council.

    It highlighted that without urgent action a £2.2bn black hole in councils’ housing budgets is expected by 2028.

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI Canada: The Government of Canada invests in a clean economy for Nova Scotia

    Source: Government of Canada News (2)

    News release

    October 25, 2024      Cape Breton, Nova Scotia        Transport Canada

    In Canada, the transportation sector is the second largest source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The Government of Canada is working to reduce these emissions through initiatives like the creation of green shipping corridors.

    Today, the Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Fisheries, Oceans and the Canadian Coast Guard and Member of Parliament of Cape Breton—Canso, Mike Kelloway, on behalf of the President of the Treasury Board and Minister of Transport, the Honourable Anita Anand, announced up to $22.5 million for EverWind Fuels. This funding, provided under the Green Shipping Corridor Program, will allow them to:

    • purchase a loading arm to fuel and fill ships with green ammonia;
    • build a pipeline to transport green ammonia from the production facility to the transport terminal; and
    • buy three tugboats and improve the dock to help move and load ships safely.

    Investments through the Green Shipping Corridor Program decarbonize the marine sector and encourage ports to adopt clean energy, while preparing them to support exports of clean fuels like ammonia.

    Reducing emissions from all modes of transportation is a key part of the Government of Canada’s plan to fight climate change. Smart climate investments like this are good for Canadian workers, good for the Canadian economy, and good for the planet. A clean transportation sector will create good, well-paying jobs for Canadians and strengthen the middle-class.

    Quotes

    “As we continue to face the growing challenges of climate change, it’s crucial that we take bold steps to reduce emissions and protect our environment. This investment in EverWind Fuels is a key part of our strategy to build a cleaner, more sustainable future for Canada’s economy.”

    The Honourable Anita Anand
    President of the Treasury Board and Minister of Transport

    “Today’s announcement highlights the Government of Canada’s ongoing commitment to reduce emissions and tackle climate change. By investing in innovative solutions at our ports, we are not only tackling climate change but also ensuring that Canada remains a leader in clean transportation. This is good news for Nova Scotians, and good news for Canadians.”

    Mike Kelloway
    Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Fisheries, Oceans, and the Canadian Coast Guard, and Member of Parliament for Cape Breton—Canso

    Quick facts

    • The Green Shipping Corridor Program provides funding for projects that contribute to the establishment of green shipping corridors and the decarbonization of the marine sector along the Great Lakes, the St. Lawrence Seaway, as well as Canada’s East and West Coasts. The program:

      • removes barriers to the adoption of emission reducing equipment and infrastructure;
      • incentivizes industry-led partnerships and investments to accelerate the adoption of greenhouse gas emission-reduction technologies and infrastructure;
      • decreases the risks of investments made to increase the technology-readiness level of low carbon and zero-emission ship technology and marine fuels for the domestic vessel fleet; and
      • builds capacity among Canadian vessel owner/operators with respect to their ability to identify, plan and implement next generation low carbon and zero-emission ship technology and marine fuels into their vessel operations.

    Associated links

    Contacts

    Laurent de Casanove
    Press Secretary
    Office of the Honourable Anita Anand
    Minister of Transport, Ottawa
    laurent.decasanove@tc.gc.ca

    Media Relations
    Transport Canada, Ottawa
    media@tc.gc.ca
    613-993-0055

    MIL OSI Canada News

  • MIL-OSI Canada: Federal government invests nearly $350,000 in active transportation in the Outaouais region

    Source: Government of Canada News (2)

    News release

    Chelsea, Quebec, October 25, 2024 — Outaouais residents will have access to safer active transportation options thanks to an investment of nearly $350,000 from the federal government to support nine active transportation planning and awareness projects led by MOBI-O, the Centre de gestion des déplacements de l’Outaouais et de l’Abitibi-Témiscamingue.

    Announced by MP for Pontiac Sophie Chatel, Mayor of Gatineau Maude Marquis-Bissonnette, Mayor of Chelsea Pierre Guénard and Mayor of Cantley David Gomes, these projects will benefit the Outaouais people by increasing the safety and accessibility of active transportation in the region.

    An investment of nearly $250,000 will enable the development of school travel plans for nine schools:

    • One high school in the City of Gatineau (Polyvalente Nicolas-Gatineau);
    • Two elementary schools in the Centre de services scolaires au Cœur-des-Vallées;
    • Five elementary schools and one high school in the Centre de services scolaires des Haut-Bois-de-l’Outaouais.

    The development of a local transportation plan for the municipalities of Chelsea and Cantley and the deployment of the “Going to school on foot or by bike, I can do it!” campaign for schools in the Centre de services scolaires des Haut-Bois-de-l’Outaouais and the La Pêche territory are also planned.

    Today’s investment will also be used to organize an awareness campaign to promote active transportation by bicycle on the City of Gatineau’s territory and to identify strategic locations in Gatineau for the future installation of bicycle parking facilities and repair stations (bicibornes). These projects will go a step further in meeting the current needs of Gatineau’s cyclists, while increasing the use of bicycles for utilitarian and recreational purposes.

    This investment contributes to Canada’s National Active Transportation Strategy by supporting planning and awareness activities. These activities help promote the benefits of active transportation and increase opportunities for Canadians to use it. It’s a big step towards healthier living and building resilient communities, making a better-connected Canada for us all.

    Quotes

    “Strategic investments in active transportation foster inclusive and sustainable communities. Today’s announcement will help communities in the Outaouais region put in place safe and accessible active transportation options to enable residents to walk or bike to access schools and easily get around important areas of their communities.”

    Sophie Chatel, Member of Parliament for Pontiac, on behalf of the Honourable Sean Fraser, Minister of Housing, Infrastructure and Communities

    “Thanks to this investment by the federal government and the work of MOBI-O, Gatineau will benefit directly from initiatives that meet the growing need to improve the safety and accessibility of active transportation within its region. These projects are a perfect reflection of our commitment to sustainable mobility while contributing to the quality of life of Gatineau residents.”

    Maude Marquis-Bissonnette, Mayor of Gatineau

    “We are delighted with the collaboration with MOBI-O and the federal financial support for the development of a local travel plan in Chelsea. This project aims to improve safety and access for residents, especially children, to the elementary school and village. Thanks to this joint commitment, we will be putting in place appropriate, sustainable infrastructures to ensure safe travel, while promoting active mobility. This plan represents an essential investment in the well-being of our community and the safety of future generations.”

    Pierre Guénard, Mayor of Chelsea

    “Active transportation is essential in Cantley and we are very pleased to be part of this joint initiative that promotes safe travel for all our citizens on our beautiful territory.”

    David Gomes, Mayor of Cantley

    “MOBI-O is proud to have obtained this funding, which represents a significant step forward for sustainable mobility in the Outaouais region. Thanks to these fundings and our valuable partnerships with municipalities and school service centres, we are able to support communities in implementing concrete solutions to encourage active mobility. These initiatives will help improve the quality of life of all citizens, while strengthening equity, health and sustainable development in our region.”

    Émilie Rachiele-Tremblay, Assistant Executive Director of MOBI-O

    Quick facts

    • The federal government is investing $348,938 in these projects through the Active Transportation Fund (ATF). MOBI-O is contributing $10,000 with $212,000 coming from other contributors.

    • Active transportation refers to the movement of people or goods powered by human activity. It includes walking, cycling and the use of human-powered or hybrid mobility aids such as wheelchairs, scooters, e-bikes, rollerblades, snowshoes, cross-country skis, and more.

    • In support of Canada’s National Active Transportation Strategy, the Active Transportation Fund is providing $400 million over five years, starting in 2021, to make travel by active transportation easier, safer, more convenient, and more enjoyable.

    • The National Active Transportation Strategy is the country’s first coast-to-coast-to-coast strategic approach for promoting active transportation and its benefits. The strategy’s aim is to make data-driven and evidence-based investments to build new and expanded active transportation networks, while supporting equitable, healthy, active, and sustainable travel options.

    • Investing in active transportation infrastructure provides many tangible benefits, such as creating good middle-class jobs, strengthening the economy, promoting healthier lifestyles, ensuring everyone has access to the same services and opportunities, cutting air and noise pollution, and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. 

    • The new Canada Public Transit Fund (CPTF) will provide an average of $3 billion a year of permanent funding to respond to local transit needs by enhancing integrated planning, improving access to public transit and active transportation, and supporting the development of more affordable, sustainable, and inclusive communities. 

    • The CPTF supports transit and active transportation investments in three streams: Metro Region Agreements, Baseline Funding, and Targeted Funding.

    • We are currently accepting Expression of Interest submissions for Metro-Region Agreements and Baseline Funding. Visit the Housing, Infrastructure and Communities Canada website for more information.

    Related products

    Associated links

    Contacts

    For more information (media only), please contact:

    Sofia Ouslis
    Press Secretary
    Office of the Minister of Housing, Infrastructure and Communities
    Sofia.ouslis@infc.gc.ca

    Media Relations
    Housing, Infrastructure and Communities Canada
    613-960-9251
    Toll free: 1-877-250-7154
    Email: media-medias@infc.gc.ca
    Follow us on XFacebookInstagram and LinkedIn
    Web: Housing, Infrastructure and Communities Canada

    Émilie Rachiele-Tremblay
    Assistant Executive Director
    MOBI-O
    819-205-2085, ext. 104
    emilie.rachiele@mobi-o.ca

    Laurent Lavallée
    Communications Director
    City of Gatineau
    613-606-7242
    lavalle.laurent@gatineau.ca

    Ghislaine Grenier
    Interim Communications Officer
    Municipality of Chelsea
    819-827-1124, ext. 202
    g.grenier@chelsea.ca

    Johanne Albert-Cardinal
    Communications Officer
    Municipality of Cantley
    819-827-3434, ext. 6838
    communications@cantley.ca

    MIL OSI Canada News

  • MIL-OSI: QPR Software Plc’s Financial Reporting in 2025

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    QPR SOFTWARE PLC                STOCK EXCHANGE RELEASE      October 25, 2024, at 5:00 p.m. EET

    In this stock exchange release, QPR Software Plc presents its financial calendar for 2025, including the planned publication dates for financial reports.

    QPR will publish three interim reports in 2025:

    • Interim Report for January–March 2025 on Thursday, April 24, 2025
    • Half-year Financial Report for January–June 2025 on Friday, July 18, 2025
    • Interim Report for January–September 2025 on Friday, October 31, 2025

    QPR Software’s financial statement bulletin, activity report, audit report, and report on the corporate governance system for the financial year 2024 will be published on Friday, February 14, 2025.

    The annual report for 2024 will be published on Friday, April 3, 2025.

    QPR’s Annual General Meeting for 2025 is planned to be held on Wednesday, June 18, 2025. The Board of Directors convenes the Annual General Meeting with a invitation to be published later.

    For further information:

    Heikki Veijola

    Chief Executive Officer

    QPR Software Plc

    Tel. +358 40 922 6029

    QPR Software in Brief

    QPR Software (Nasdaq Helsinki) is a leading player in the Digital Twin of an Organization (DTO) use case and one of the most advanced process mining software companies in the world. The company innovates, develops, and delivers software for analyzing, monitoring, and modeling organizational operations. Additionally, QPR provides consulting services to ensure its customers derive full benefits from the software and associated methodologies.

    www.qpr.com

    DISTRIBUTION

    Nasdaq Helsinki

    Key medias

    www.qpr.com

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Russia: 2024 Annual Meetings – Address by the Chair of the Boards of Governors

    Source: IMF – News in Russian

    H.E. Ahmed Munawar
    Governor of the Maldives Monetary Authority

    October 25, 2024

    بسم الله الرّحمن الرّحيم

    As-alam-alaikum and a very good morning

    It is a great honor to welcome you to the 2024 Plenary of the Boards of Governors of the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank Group.

    A warm welcome to the Managing Director of the IMF Kristalina Georgieva and the President of the World Bank Group Ajay Banga. Congratulations Ms. Georgieva, on commencing your second term as the MD.

    This year is special. We are celebrating the 80th anniversary of the Bretton Woods Institutions—a major milestone in the history of global economic governance. I would like to reflect on the words of the first Annual Meetings Chair of the Boards of Governors, U.S. Treasury Secretary, John W. Snyder: “In joining the Fund and Bank, our respective governments have not only invested large sums of money, but they have in a considerable measure staked their economic destinies on the success of these institutions. We must not fail our governments and, above all, the hopeful people we represent.”

    These words hold true today, as they did 80 years ago. For 80 years, the IMF and World Bank have remained beacons of hope, managing global crises from wars to pandemics. Even in tough times, we find resilience. Chairing the Board of Governors in this historic meeting by a small state like mine is a sign of the inclusivity of these institutions.

    Despite tighter financial conditions and rising geopolitical tensions, the global economy is showing remarkable strength. A soft landing is within reach. Inflation is moderating. Yet, we cannot become complacent. Uncertainty remains high. Ongoing conflicts and upheavals in many parts of the world cast a shadow over our progress, and further escalations would have a much larger impact on vulnerable economies, including through higher commodity prices.

    It is true that significant challenges remain, and I would like to highlight three such challenges.

    Firstly, climate change. Small countries like the Maldives, are on the front lines of climate change. The Maldives aims to have 33% of its electricity from renewable sources by 2028. This transition will build climate resilience and deliver significant fiscal and foreign exchange savings. Achieving the target requires around 1.3 billion dollars to upgrade power infrastructure, of which only 13% has been pledged by donors so far. Small Island Developing States (SIDS) like the Maldives call on international financial institutions to provide easier and affordable climate finance for adaptation and mitigation on the principles of a just energy transition. While the IMF’s Resilience and Sustainability Fund and the World Bank’s record 42.6 billion dollars in fiscal year 2024 in climate finance are commendable. More is needed, especially for climate vulnerable SIDS. Additionally, we must innovatively rethink and implement strategies to mobilize private sector investments.

    Secondly, debt sustainability. Over two-thirds of emerging markets and developing economies are at high risk of debt distress. While the Global Sovereign Debt Roundtable has encouraged collaboration, more action is needed. Debt sustainability analysis must better account for country context, and the ongoing review of the Debt Sustainability Framework for Low-Income Countries should look at the specific needs of SIDS. The IMF, World Bank, and MDBs should take bold steps to support countries in debt distress. MDBs can also create tools like debt-for-climate swaps, exchanging debt relief for climate adaptation investments.

    Finally,structural reforms. We must strengthen the productive and state capacities of emerging and developing economies. The Bretton Woods Institutions should focus more on job creation, equal opportunities, economic diversification, and the impact of refugee flows. Similarly, structural reforms must be socially acceptable, ensuring benefits are widely shared.

    Over the past year, the IMF and World Bank have undertaken significant initiatives to support our members. The completion of the 16th General Review of Quotas, the IDA21 Replenishment, and discussions on quota realignment and strengthening World Bank Group’s financing will help ensure that these institutions remain adequately resourced. At the same time, let us not lose sight of the importance of providing adequate access and representation to the countries which need MDB support the most, as well as ensuring evenhanded treatment across the membership.

    The review of the IMF’s Poverty Reduction and Growth Trust, Charges and Surcharge Policy together with the World Bank’s IDA21 Replenishment demonstrate support for our most vulnerable nations.

    As I reflect on the discussions I have had during these Annual Meetings, one theme has emerged strongly: the critical need for multilateral cooperation. My friends, collective action is the antidote to an increasingly fragmented world. The 80th anniversary of the Bretton Woods Institutions provides a moment to reflect on our achievements, and plan for a better future together. Let me extend a warm welcome to Liechtenstein, which earlier this week joined the IMF as its hundred and ninety-first member, further reinforcing the importance of multilateralism. I am pleased with addition of the 25th Chair at the IMF’s Executive Board for Sub-Saharan Africa, and urge my fellow Governors to champion gender diversity and equality.

    As the Bretton Woods Institutions plan for the future, they should tailor their advice and activities to meet the specific needs and capacities of each member. If we fail to do this, we fail the people we represent, as the first Annual Meetings Chair, John Snyder, wisely reminded us 80 years ago. As I conclude, let us remind ourselves of our unwavering commitment to macroeconomic stability, prosperity, and cooperation.

    Thank you.

    IMF Communications Department
    MEDIA RELATIONS

    PRESS OFFICER:

    Phone: +1 202 623-7100Email: MEDIA@IMF.org

    @IMFSpokesperson

    https://www.imf.org/en/News/Articles/2024/10/25/sp102524-annual-meetings-plenary-chairman

    MIL OSI

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Federal Court Orders Precious Metals Dealer, its CEO and President to Pay $49M for Fraudulent Misappropriation Scheme

    Source: US Commodity Futures Trading Commission

    — The Commodity Futures Trading Commission today announced U.S. District Judge Fernando M. Olguin, Central District of California, issued orders of default judgment against a company and two individuals: Regal Assets LLC, a California LLC; Regal Assets’ owner and CEO, Tyler G. Gallagher, formerly of Los Angeles; and Regal Assets’ former President Leah Donoso of Robinson, Texas.

    The orders stem from the CFTC and the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation complaint jointly filed Sept. 27, 2023, charging the defendants with misappropriating customer funds given to defendants to purchase precious metals from Regal Assets. [See CFTC Press Release No. 8791-23].

    As alleged in the complaint, Regal Assets solicited customers to transfer funds primarily from their tax-deferred retirement accounts to purchase precious metals from Regal Assets through self-directed IRAs. Rather than using all of the customers’ funds to purchase precious metals, the defendants misappropriated more than $21 million from more than 120 customers. The defendants made knowing or reckless fraudulent misrepresentations and omissions to customers, including using forged documents to conceal their misappropriation and maintain their fraudulent scheme.

    Under the terms of the orders issued Oct. 15, the defendants are required to pay, jointly and severally, over $21.9 million in restitution to defrauded customers and civil monetary penalties over $27.3 million. The orders also permanently enjoin the defendants from engaging in conduct that violates the CEA and California law, as charged, and permanently bans them from registering with the CFTC and from trading in any CFTC-regulated markets. The orders resolve the CFTC’s lawsuit against all three defendants.

    The CFTC thanks DFPI, its co-plaintiff in this action, for its assistance.

    Division of Enforcement staff responsible for this action are Rishi Gupta, Brendan Forbes, Kara Mucha, Erica Bodin, Daniel Jordan and Rick Glaser.

    CFTC’s Precious Metals Customer Fraud Advisory

    The CFTC has issued several customer protection fraud advisories and articles, including the Precious Metals Fraud Advisory, which provides information about fraud involving the trading of precious metals — such as gold, silver, palladium and platinum — and how customers can detect, avoid and report these scams.

    The CFTC strongly urges the public to verify a company’s registration with the CFTC at NFA BASIC before committing funds. A customer should be wary of providing funds to any unregistered company.

    Suspicious activities or information, such as possible violations of commodity trading laws, can be reported to the Division of Enforcement via a toll-free hotline 866-FON-CFTC (866-366-2382), file a tip or complaint online, or contact the Whistleblower Office. Whistleblowers may be eligible to receive between 10 and 30 percent of the collected monetary sanctions, from the CFTC Customer Protection Fund which is financed through the sanctions paid by CEA violators.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: USGS invests Bipartisan Infrastructure Law funding to map critical mineral resources in New Mexico

    Source: US Geological Survey

    The data collection will be conducted through the USGS Earth Mapping Resources Initiative (Earth MRI), a partnership between the USGS and state geological surveys that is revolutionizing our understanding of the nation’s geology and critical mineral resources which are vital to the U.S. economy, national security and clean energy technology.  

    “These Earth MRI surveys represent a next-generation approach, bringing modern geophysics to bear that will allow us to fundamentally reevaluate our state’s inventory of resources,” said Mike Timmons, New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mines director and state geologist of New Mexico. 

    The survey’s focus will cover the North American Alkaline Igneous Belt, a geologic feature that stretches from the eastern edge of Alaska down through the Rocky Mountains and into Mexico. 

    The unique alkaline igneous rocks in New Mexico’s portion of the belt contain deposits of gold, fluorine, zirconium, rare earth elements (REE), tellurium, gallium and other critical minerals and are commonly associated with ancient faults.

    Tien Grauch, the lead USGS geophysicist for this survey, explained that the new high-resolution geophysical survey has the potential to reveal even deeper layers of igneous rocks and faults than what’s known. 

    “Combined with geologic mapping that is ongoing by the New Mexico Bureau of Geology, the new information may lead to a better understanding of critical mineral resources in the region,” said Grauch. 

    The survey footprint was designed in close collaboration with the New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources (NMBGMR), where officials say the geophysical data will improve their understanding of their state’s potential economic and natural resources. 

    While the primary benefit of this survey is to see into the region’s subsurface and map critical minerals, the data will also allow geoscientists to better understand the region’s groundwater flow, which supports NMBGMR’s Aquifer Mapping Program. 

    “This will be our first high-definition look at this area’s geology, and we can leverage the data across so many disciplines,” said Virginia McLemore, NMBGMR principal senior economic geologist. “Every opportunity we get to bring in new tools or data, we learn something completely new.” 

    These Earth MRI airborne geophysical surveys will collect a combination of magnetic and radiometric data. These data can be used to map rocks from just beneath vegetation and shallow sediment cover down to several miles underground. Magnetic data can be used to identify inactive faults, lava flows, other geologic features and potentially the signatures of mineral deposits. Radiometric data indicate the relative amounts of potassium, uranium and thorium in shallow rocks and soil. 

    Scientists use this information to help map rocks that may contain mineral deposits, faults that may rupture during an earthquake, areas that may be prone to increased radon, and geologic features that affect groundwater or energy resources.

    This New Mexico survey complements a similar Earth MRI geophysical survey that will be flown over the alkaline igneous belt in Texas later in the year. Both these surveys adjoin an Earth MRI survey in the Trans-Pecos region that has already been completed.

    The initial airborne geophysical survey may be followed by additional investments, including new geologic maps, geochemical sampling, and other techniques to better understand the region’s geologic framework.

    Since 2021, the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law has advanced scientific innovation through a $320 million investment for the USGS to better map the Nation’s mineral resources, both still in the ground and in mine wastes, and to preserve historical geologic data and samples. Through the end of fiscal year 2024, more than $160 million has been obligated for Earth MRI initiatives, propelling efforts to make “once-in-a-generation” advancements in the nation’s geologic and geophysical data collections and mapping. 

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: FEMA Calls in North Carolina May Come from Unknown Phone Numbers

    Source: US Federal Emergency Management Agency

    Headline: FEMA Calls in North Carolina May Come from Unknown Phone Numbers

    FEMA Calls in North Carolina May Come from Unknown Phone Numbers

    RALEIGH, N.C. – Homeowners and renters in 39 North Carolina counties and tribal members of the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians who applied for FEMA disaster assistance following Helene in North Carolina should be aware that FEMA representatives may call from unfamiliar area codes and phone numbers or show SPAM or no caller ID.It is important to answer the call. FEMA representatives are reaching out to citizens that have applied for disaster assistance. Representatives may call for a variety of reasons such as issues with applications (missing documents, insurance settlement paperwork, etc.), follow-up on access and functional needs and/or to schedule inspections at the address where the damage was reported. Inspections are required to determine whether a home is safe, sanitary, functional and accessible. If an inspection cannot be scheduled, that may cause a delay in FEMA’s review of the application.Take Steps to Avoid ScamsAlways be alert to these illegitimate practices:A FEMA inspector calls, and you did not submit a FEMA application.A FEMA inspector asks for your banking information. (FEMA inspectors are never authorized to collect your personal financial information.)A payment is requested from someone who says they are from FEMA. (FEMA will never request payment.) If any of these things happen to you — or if you receive a call from someone saying they are a FEMA representative, but you aren’t sure, call the FEMA Helpline at 800-621-3362 to report the incident. The Helpline will be able to help you stop the processing of an application made in your name without your knowledge or apply for FEMA assistance if you live within a declared county.If you believe you are the victim of a scam related to Helene response, you should file a complaint with the North Carolina Department of Justice by visiting ncdoj.gov/complaint or calling toll-free at 877-566-7226.If you have knowledge of fraud, waste or abuse, you can report these tips – 24 hours a day, seven days a week – to the FEMA Disaster Fraud Hotline at 866-720-5721. You can also email StopFEMAFraud@fema.dhs.gov to report a tip. 
    barbara.murien…
    Fri, 10/25/2024 – 14:00

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI: North Dallas Bank & Trust Co. Announces Second Quarter Earnings

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    DALLAS, Oct. 25, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — NDBT (North Dallas Bank & Trust Co.), an independent community bank established in 1961, today announced net earnings for three months of $502,493 or $0.20 per share, and net earnings for nine months of $2,186,955 or $0.85 per share, for the periods ending September 30, 2024.

    Earnings were prepared internally without review by the company’s independent accountants. Financial results are the results of past performance, events and market conditions, and are not a guarantee for future results. Any forward-looking implications derived from this information may differ materially from actual results.

    Further information about the earning and financial performance is available from Glenn Henry, Chief Financial Officer, by contacting NDBT.

    ABOUT NDBT
    Founded in 1961, NDBT (North Dallas Bank & Trust Co.) is an independent community bank with five banking centers located in Dallas, Addison, Frisco, Las Colinas, and Plano. Headquartered on the corner of Preston Road and LBJ at 12900 Preston Road in Dallas, NDBT is dedicated to helping people make smarter choices in business and life by offering authentic banking solutions, wealth management, and innovative online banking tools. NDBT is Member FDIC and an Equal Housing Lender. For more information, call 972.716.7100, or visit online at www.ndbt.com.

    NORTH DALLAS BANK & TRUST CO.
    12900 PRESTON ROAD
    DALLAS, TEXAS
                   
    FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS Three Months Ended   Nine Months Ended
      September 30   September 30
    Income Statement 2024   2023   2024   2023
                   
    Interest Income 19,690,721     16,080,200     57,809,406     45,415,030  
    Interest Expense 11,417,563     8,497,071     32,759,175     19,553,246  
    Net Interest Income 8,273,158     7,583,129     25,050,231     25,861,784  
                   
    Provision for Loan Losses 0     0     (440,000 )   (450,000 )
    Noninterest Income 1,546,280     1,947,351     4,384,215     4,659,259  
    Noninterest Expenses (9,302,724 )   (8,767,533 )   (26,524,077 )   (25,989,503 )
    Income Before Taxes & Extraordinary 516,714     762,947     2,470,369     4,081,540  
                   
    Income Tax (14,221 )   (95,021 )   (258,414 )   (679,355 )
    Income Tax Prior Period (25,000 )   0     (25,000 )   0  
    Net Income 502,493     667,926     2,186,955     3,402,185  
                   
    Earnings per Share 0.20     0.26     0.85     1.32  
                   
              Nine Month Average
      As of September 30   Ended September 30
    Balance Sheet 2024   2023   2024   2023
                   
    Total Assets 1,867,355,555     1,728,752,439     1,819,265,389     1,697,914,626  
    Total Loans 1,211,656,001     1,133,317,827     1,206,729,021     1,057,729,435  
    Deposits 1,543,618,454     1,468,335,323     1,503,472,762     1,472,027,210  
    Stockholders’ Equity 170,479,567     160,495,368     166,294,611     160,534,861  
                   
    (Prepared internally without review by
    our independent accountants)
                   

    Media Contact:
    Brian C. Jensen
    972-716-7124
    brian.jensen@ndbt.com

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Economics: Southern Africa joins advancing effort to build a united continental front against malnutrition

    Source: African Development Bank Group

    Representatives of the African Development Bank, the African Leaders for Nutrition (ALN) initiative, the African Union Commission (AUC), and the government of Botswana came together in Gaborone, Botswana to develop a unified approach to addressing malnutrition in Southern Africa.  

    The event, held on September 10 and 11, 2024, also drew nutrition experts from 15 countries in the region to support the development of Africa’s first-ever Multisectoral Nutrition Policy Framework (MNPF). Participants also discussed high-impact interventions, the establishment of sustainable funding mechanisms for nutrition programs, and financing targets. The consultation outcomes are expected to guide policy formulation and promote increased investments in nutrition across the region.

    The call for the development of a multisectoral policy framework and an investment target to ensure adequate funding for nutrition initiatives emerged from the 41st Ordinary Session of the African Union’s Executive Council, which was held in July 2022 in Lusaka, Zambia.

    The economic and social impacts of malnutrition took center stage in the discussions. One-third of African children under five suffer from stunting, even as obesity is an increasing challenge, with rates reaching 55 percent in some countries.

    In her remarks, Dr. Mareko Ramotsababa, Secretary for Primary Health Care in Botswana, observed: “The region is still lagging behind in achieving the goals set for the Africa Agenda 2063, particularly in ending hunger, achieving food security, and improving nutrition. Although there’s been some improvement in malnutrition rates in the SADC region recently, child undernutrition remains a significant concern. Most member states have stunting rates surpassing 25 percent and wasting rates exceeding 5 percent. This calls for immediate and concerted action.”

    Prof. Julio Rakotonirina, African Union Commission Director for Health and Humanitarian Affairs in the Department of Health, Humanitarian Affairs and Social Development, said: “These statistics must worry us because they stand in the way of achieving our aspiration for Agenda 2063, the Africa We Want. It is clear from these statistics that investing in the nutrition of our people to create a healthy and productive society is an economic imperative and should sit at the very center of Africa’s transformation agenda. Investing in better nutrition also makes financial sense. For a typical African country, every dollar invested in reducing chronic undernutrition in children yields a return of $16.”

    Mr. George Ouma, African Development Bank Coordinator of African Leaders for Nutrition, reflected on the event’s significance in the context of the Bank’s 60th anniversary, which took place on 9-10 September. “This regional consultation exemplifies the African Development Bank’s enduring commitment to advancing multisectoral nutrition strategies. As we celebrate 60 years of the Bank’s impact, we’re reminded that the mandate from the 41st Ordinary Session in Lusaka in 2022 anchors our gathering,” he said. “The urgency of a unified, multisectoral approach to combating malnutrition aligns perfectly with the Bank’s six-decade journey of fostering collaborative, cross-sector development initiatives.”

    The regional consultation for Southern Africa follows one for the West Africa region held in Dakar, Senegal, in August 2024. Under the continental MNPF, regional consultations will take place in all five regions of Africa, culminating in the development of a unified policy and investment target for the entire continent.

    The consultations will also help mobilize support for African countries ahead of the Nutrition for Growth Summit scheduled to be held in France in 2025. That Summit, a global event held every four years in the Olympic host country, brings governments and other key stakeholders together to accelerate progress toward ending malnutrition by 2030.

    About ALN

    The African Leaders for Nutrition (ALN) Initiative, spearheaded by the African Development Bank and championed by African leaders, works to galvanise political will and significant investments to end nutrition. Since it was officially endorsed on January 31, 2018, by the AU Assembly of Heads of State and Governments, ALN has secured critical commitments from governments across Africa, leading to impactful policy changes and cross-sector collaborations. 

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Draft budget hopes to tackle council’s financial challenges head on

    Source: City of Canterbury

    Coping with ever-rocketing external costs and increasing demands for council services are at the heart of Canterbury City Council’s budget proposals for 2025/2026.

    If nothing else changed, rising prices alone would account for an increase in spending of just over £1m.

    To counter this, the draft budget says it has identified £701,000 in efficiency savings and can shave a further £393,000 because of proposed changes to some service levels.

    Cllr Mike Sole, Canterbury City Council’s Cabinet Member for Finance, said: “It is no secret that councils across the country of all political persuasions are facing a really difficult financial situation. We are no different.

    “And drafting this budget is a touch more challenging than it usually is as we’re waiting to find out how much money the new Chancellor will be able to find for councils which are facing a plethora of challenges.

    “Some of our assumptions could well change for the better.

    “As an administration that is determined to be prudent and careful with council taxpayers’ money, we know we are not able to significantly expand the services that are important to us right now.

    “But we are determined to use advances in technology to help us to work smarter, achieve more and generate extra cash especially when it comes to our property portfolio.

    “Finally, the draft budget promises we will put aside the extra money needed to ensure we cement and build on the legacy of the Levelling Up Fund projects.”

    The draft budget also proposes:

    • the introduction of a cultural grant pot of £30,000 per year to support more events and festivals
    • freezing parking charges for more than 4,000 parking spaces in council-owned car parks including Park and Ride, reducing the cost of parking at the Riverside complex by 37% and reversing last year’s increase in School Lane, Herne
    • the introduction of an annual Park and Ride permit for £50 per month or £600 per year saving motorists money
    • the introduction of a Park and Ride corporate account allowing businesses to encourage their staff to park for just £2.50 per day including free parking at the weekend
    • to convert 20 of Canenco’s larger diesel refuse collection vehicles to run on hydrogenated vegetable oil to help cut emissions and help the environment, at a cost of approximately £20,000 a year
    • a 3% increase in council tax meaning people living in an average Band D property will pay an extra 14p per week
    • saving £58,000 by reducing the number of times the grass is cut in amenity sites, such as parks and playing fields, from 18 times a year to 10 times a year

    If accepted, the draft budget suggests most of the council’s fees and charges should only go up by 3%. The exceptions are:

    • a 20% increase for developers seeking what is known as pre-app advice before putting in a press release
    • a 5% increase for beach hut owners except for those at East Cliff which will be reduced by 14%
    • a 5% increase for people using the council’s slipways for launching jet skis etc

    Leader of the Council, Cllr Alan Baldock, said: “Finding more than £1 million in cost savings after years and years of finding ways to be more efficient is no mean feat and is a real testament to officers and we are incredibly grateful for their hard work.

    “We’re determined to do all we can to spot opportunities to invest in improvements to our services so that we can save money in the future and spend it on the key priorities we were elected to deliver.

    “This really is a listening exercise and we want to hear the views of everyone that lives, works and studies in the district.

    “People have become jaded when it comes to consultations around key but difficult issues.

    “I hope our proposed changes to tariffs in School Lane in Herne show we are more than prepared to listen.”

    The Cabinet will decide whether to give permission to consult on the draft budget at its meeting on Monday 4 November at 7pm in the Guildhall, St Peter’s Place, Canterbury.

    If approved, the consultation will run from Monday 11 November 2024 to Monday 6 January 2025.

    Published: 25 October 2024

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI Canada: Remarks by the Deputy Prime Minister on measures to help Canadians buy or rent a home

    Source: Government of Canada News

    Remarks by the Deputy Prime Minister on measures to help Canadians buy or own a home

    October 10, 2024 – Scarborough, Ontario

    Check against delivery

    Good afternoon.

    I would first like to acknowledge that we are gathered on the traditional territories of many nations, including the Mississaugas of the Credit, the Anishnabeg, the Chippewa, the Haudenosaunee and the Wendat Peoples.

    I would like to thank the wonderful family, the wonderful couple who have hosted me here today in their home, Faten Salloum and Samer Ghazi.

    I really want to thank you for your warm welcome. I want to thank you for the contributions you make to Canada every single day and it was really a pleasure for me to see the beautiful home you live in with your three wonderful daughters.

    Faten and Samer used a First Home Savings Account to save up some money to buy their very first home and they also used the Home Buyers’ Plan to withdraw some money from other savings accounts.

    It’s really heartwarming for me to meet a family that is taking advantage of some of the programs we’ve put in place to buy their first home.

    I would like to begin by briefly talking about the Canadian economy. Canada leads the G7 by achieving a soft landing following the COVID recession.

    Inflation eased to 2% in August and Canada’s inflation remained in the Bank of Canada’s target range for eight consecutive months. Canada was the first G7 country to reduce the overnight rate for the first time. Canada was the first G7 country to reduce the policy interest rate for a second time and Canada was the first G7 country to reduce the overnight rate for a third time. 

    The economy is on the right track. This is good news for Canadians, for Canadian families like Faten and Samer’s family. Wages exceeded inflation for 19 consecutive months, and this is significant news because it means that people’s wages, cheques, have more buying power.

    Now I’d like to talk for a moment about the new measures we’ve been putting in place over the past several weeks, including a new measure we announced just a couple of days ago to help even more families buy a home, to help families expand that home.

    We announced 30-year mortgage amortizations, for all first-time home buyers, for families like Samer and Faten’s and for all Canadians buying a newly built home.

    We announced the level for insured mortgages will be increased to $1.5 million and those measures will come into force on December 15th.

    This week we announced some measures we’ve put in place to help families who want to add a secondary suite to their home. This is something I’m excited about because we all know that Canada needs to build more homes faster. We know an important way to do that is to have gentle density in our cities, in our neighbourhoods.

    We put measures in place last year to encourage big developers to build more homes faster, particularly when it comes to purpose-built rentals. There’s a gap in the market and that’s important.

    The measures we announced this week will allow regular Canadian families to expand their homes, make it easier for them to expand their homes.

    We think that sort of gentle density is a good way to allow Canadian families to participate in this great national project of increasing housing supply. So, what have we done?

    We have said if you are building a secondary suite, adding it to your home, whether it’s a basement apartment, a garden suite, laneway housing, you can refinance your mortgage and have a 30-year amortization. You can access up to 90 % of the value of your home including the value added by the secondary suite and in the insured market you will be eligible for these terms for a value of up to $2 million, including the value that the secondary suite adds.

    Those changes are going to be effective January 15th. I know I talked to a lot of Canadian families who are keen to add that space to their home, have a family member be able to live with them. This is going to allow them to do that and more generally add that gentle density, add that supply for all of us.

    We also announced in the budget that if you have an insured mortgage, you do not have to requalify with a new stress test to switch lenders.

    The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions announced recently that if you have an uninsured mortgage and you just want to do a straight switch to a different lender, you do not have to requalify. I want to emphasize those two announcements because together what they mean is if you have a mortgage and it’s coming up for renewal, you do not have to pass a stress test again to switch lenders. It’s important for me because I have talked to a lot of Canadians who are concerned about the mortgage renewal that’s coming up.

    Today you can shop around. You can get the best deal for yourself and your family. I think that is a really valuable benefit.

    We have an ambitious plan to build more homes faster, to get 4 million homes built by 2031. Key elements of that plan are to increase supply. Increasing supply by removing the GST on purpose-built rentals, increasing supply by providing even more concessional financing from CMHC to get those purpose-built rental apartments built.

    Increasing supply by working through our Housing Accelerator Fund with municipalities to get them cut the red tape so it is possible to build more homes faster and increasing supply by looking at the stuff the federal government owns and liberating federal lands. We call it “lazy land”. Let’s liberate that so that it is used to build homes for more Canadian families.

    We’re focused on ensuring that young families like this one are able to buy their first home.

    I want to conclude by emphasizing really good news we have had this week. Rents are coming down in Toronto and in the GTA. In Toronto, the rent for a one-bedroom apartment is down more than 1 per cent month over month and more than 8 per cent year over year. For a two-bedroom apartment it is down 0.8 per cent month over month and 8.2 per cent year over year. We’ve seen reductions in rent month over month and year over year in communities across the GTA. In Mississauga, Oakville, North York, Etobicoke, Burlington and Brampton. I emphasize that because I know that since the COVID recession, things have been hard for Canadians and rent has been a real challenge for a lot of Canadian families. The fact that rents are coming down is good news.

    Thank you for listening. I would one last time like to thank Faten and Samer, congratulate them on their beautiful house and beautiful family, thank them for their warm welcome today. 

    MIL OSI Canada News

  • MIL-OSI: Fentura Financial, Inc. Announces Third Quarter 2024 Earnings (unaudited)

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Dollars in thousands except per share amounts. Certain items in the prior period financial statements have been reclassified to conform with the September 30, 2024 presentation.

    FENTON, Mich., Oct. 25, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Fentura Financial, Inc. (OTCQX: FETM) announces quarterly net income results of $867 and $5,637 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024, respectively.

    Ronald L. Justice, President and CEO, stated, “We ended the 2024 third quarter with record total assets, deposits, and shareholders’ equity. These results are a testament to the continued hard work of our team members, and the local value we provide our Michigan communities. During the third quarter, we announced a merger with ChoiceOne Financial Services, Inc., pursuant to which ChoiceOne and Fentura will merge in an all-stock transaction. Once completed, the combination will create the third largest publicly traded bank in Michigan with approximately $4.3 billion in consolidated total assets and 56 offices in Western, Central and Southeastern Michigan. We continue to expect to close the transaction in the first quarter of 2025, subject to the satisfaction of customary closing conditions and regulatory approvals.”

    Following is a discussion of our financial performance as of, and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024. At the end of this document is a list of abbreviations and acronyms.

    Results of Operations (unaudited)
    The following table outlines our QTD results of operations and provides certain performance measures as of, and for the three months ended:

        9/30/2024   6/30/2024   3/31/2024   12/31/2023   9/30/2023
    INCOME STATEMENT DATA                    
    Interest income   $ 22,194     $ 21,487     $ 21,541     $ 21,033     $ 20,416  
    Interest expense     10,202       9,650       9,315       8,526       7,757  
    Net interest income     11,992       11,837       12,226       12,507       12,659  
    Credit loss expense (reversal)     1,203       796       (43 )     (190 )     (309 )
    Noninterest income     2,210       2,314       2,355       2,145       2,338  
    Noninterest expenses     11,974       10,921       11,166       10,121       10,594  
    Federal income tax expense     158       454       668       937       937  
    Net income   $ 867     $ 1,980     $ 2,790     $ 3,784     $ 3,775  
    PER SHARE                    
    Earnings   $ 0.19     $ 0.44     $ 0.63     $ 0.85     $ 0.85  
    Dividends   $ 0.11     $ 0.11     $ 0.11     $ 0.10     $ 0.10  
    Tangible book value(1)   $ 30.51     $ 29.84     $ 29.38     $ 28.92     $ 27.64  
    Quoted market value                    
    High   $ 40.00     $ 24.39     $ 27.20     $ 27.20     $ 23.74  
    Low   $ 22.16     $ 22.33     $ 24.00     $ 22.26     $ 19.10  
    Close(1)   $ 39.07     $ 22.50     $ 24.40     $ 27.20     $ 23.74  
    PERFORMANCE RATIOS                    
    Return on average assets     0.19 %     0.45 %     0.63 %     0.86 %     0.86 %
    Return on average shareholders’ equity     2.37 %     5.59 %     7.98 %     11.11 %     11.27 %
    Return on average tangible shareholders’ equity     2.54 %     5.98 %     8.55 %     11.94 %     12.14 %
    Efficiency ratio     84.31 %     77.17 %     76.58 %     69.08 %     70.64 %
    Yield on average earning assets (FTE)     5.17 %     5.18 %     5.15 %     5.06 %     4.92 %
    Rate on interest bearing liabilities     3.28 %     3.22 %     3.11 %     2.90 %     2.66 %
    Net interest margin to average earning assets (FTE)     2.80 %     2.85 %     2.92 %     3.01 %     3.05 %
    BALANCE SHEET DATA(1)                    
    Total investment securities   $ 99,724     $ 100,167     $ 103,210     $ 107,615     $ 109,543  
    Gross loans   $ 1,442,389     $ 1,459,929     $ 1,461,465     $ 1,473,471     $ 1,483,720  
    Allowance for credit losses   $ 14,700     $ 15,300     $ 15,300     $ 15,400     $ 15,400  
    Total assets   $ 1,807,370     $ 1,756,629     $ 1,764,629     $ 1,738,952     $ 1,744,939  
    Total deposits   $ 1,470,586     $ 1,427,059     $ 1,438,408     $ 1,394,182     $ 1,401,797  
    Borrowed funds   $ 179,970     $ 178,397     $ 178,500     $ 198,500     $ 201,050  
    Total shareholders’ equity   $ 146,398     $ 143,301     $ 141,074     $ 138,702     $ 132,902  
    Net loans to total deposits     97.08 %     101.23 %     100.54 %     104.58 %     104.75 %
    Common shares outstanding     4,495,005       4,490,087       4,484,447       4,470,871       4,466,221  
    QTD BALANCE SHEET AVERAGES                    
    Total assets   $ 1,797,307     $ 1,762,651     $ 1,771,614     $ 1,740,526     $ 1,739,510  
    Earning assets   $ 1,708,177     $ 1,669,862     $ 1,683,708     $ 1,649,091     $ 1,646,848  
    Interest bearing liabilities   $ 1,237,665     $ 1,204,370     $ 1,205,162     $ 1,165,064     $ 1,156,835  
    Total shareholders’ equity   $ 145,240     $ 142,577     $ 140,574     $ 135,157     $ 132,860  
    Total tangible shareholders’ equity   $ 135,959     $ 133,252     $ 131,204     $ 125,723     $ 123,349  
    Earned common shares outstanding     4,466,951       4,461,580       4,449,376       4,443,463       4,437,415  
    Unvested stock grants     26,500       26,500       31,821       26,018       26,668  
    Total common shares outstanding     4,493,451       4,488,080       4,481,197       4,469,481       4,464,083  
    ASSET QUALITY                    
    Nonperforming loans to gross loans (1)     0.71 %     0.66 %     0.39 %     0.38 %     0.24 %
    Nonperforming assets to total assets (1)     0.58 %     0.56 %     0.34 %     0.35 %     0.23 %
    Allowance for credit losses to gross loans (1)     1.02 %     1.05 %     1.05 %     1.05 %     1.04 %
    Net charge-offs (recoveries) to QTD average gross loans     0.12 %     0.05 %     %   (0.01)%   (0.03)%
    Credit loss expense (reversal) to QTD average gross loans     0.08 %     0.05 %     %   (0.01)%   (0.02)%
    CAPITAL RATIOS(1)                    
    Total capital to risk weighted assets     12.48 %     12.38 %     12.27 %     11.91 %     11.59 %
    Tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets     11.42 %     11.28 %     11.17 %     10.82 %     10.51 %
    CET1 capital to risk weighted assets     10.40 %     10.28 %     10.17 %     9.83 %     9.53 %
    Tier 1 leverage ratio     8.78 %     8.92 %     8.78 %     8.77 %     8.58 %
                         
    (1)At end of period                    

    The following table outlines our YTD results of operations and provides certain performance measures as of, and for the nine months ended (unaudited):

        9/30/2024   9/30/2023   9/30/2022   9/30/2021   9/30/2020
    INCOME STATEMENT DATA                    
    Interest income   $ 65,222     $ 58,648     $ 41,438     $ 35,161     $ 34,355  
    Interest expense     29,167       19,561       3,122       2,091       4,952  
    Net interest income     36,055       39,087       38,316       33,070       29,403  
    Credit loss expense (reversal)     1,956       132       2,258       (218 )     4,652  
    Noninterest income     6,879       7,126       7,997       11,092       15,190  
    Noninterest expenses     34,061       32,547       30,870       27,815       23,939  
    Federal income tax expense     1,280       2,689       2,616       3,328       3,271  
    Net income   $ 5,637     $ 10,845     $ 10,569     $ 13,237     $ 12,731  
    PER SHARE                    
    Earnings   $ 1.26     $ 2.45     $ 2.39     $ 2.86     $ 2.73  
    Dividends   $ 0.33     $ 0.3     $ 0.27     $ 0.24     $ 0.225  
    Tangible book value(1)   $ 30.51     $ 27.64     $ 25.22     $ 26.53     $ 23.50  
    Quoted market value                    
    High   $ 40.00     $ 24.10     $ 29.25     $ 27.40     $ 26.00  
    Low   $ 22.16     $ 18.70     $ 23.00     $ 21.90     $ 12.55  
    Close(1)   $ 39.07     $ 23.74     $ 23.00     $ 25.75     $ 16.93  
    PERFORMANCE RATIOS                    
    Return on average assets     0.42 %     0.85 %     0.95 %     1.36 %     1.45 %
    Return on average shareholders’ equity     5.27 %     11.15 %     11.71 %     14.55 %     15.79 %
    Return on average tangible shareholders’ equity     5.64 %     12.03 %     12.75 %     15.00 %     16.40 %
    Efficiency ratio     79.33 %     70.43 %     66.66 %     62.98 %     53.68 %
    Yield on average earning assets (FTE)     5.17 %     4.84 %     3.99 %     3.83 %     4.12 %
    Rate on interest bearing liabilities     3.20 %     2.35 %     0.49 %     0.37 %     0.93 %
    Net interest margin to average earning assets (FTE)     2.86 %     3.23 %     3.69 %     3.60 %     3.52 %
    BALANCE SHEET DATA(1)                    
    Total investment securities   $ 99,724     $ 109,543     $ 129,886     $ 138,476     $ 78,179  
    Gross loans   $ 1,442,389     $ 1,483,720     $ 1,350,851     $ 1,015,177     $ 1,060,885  
    Allowance for credit losses   $ 14,700     $ 15,400     $ 12,200     $ 10,500     $ 10,100  
    Total assets   $ 1,807,370     $ 1,744,939     $ 1,588,592     $ 1,329,300     $ 1,284,845  
    Total deposits   $ 1,470,586     $ 1,401,797     $ 1,345,209     $ 1,144,291     $ 1,061,470  
    Borrowed funds   $ 179,970     $ 201,050     $ 116,600     $ 50,000     $ 96,217  
    Total shareholders’ equity   $ 146,398     $ 132,902     $ 121,630     $ 124,809     $ 114,081  
    Net loans to total deposits     97.08 %     104.75 %     99.51 %     87.80 %     98.99 %
    Common shares outstanding     4,495,005       4,466,221       4,434,937       4,569,935       4,691,142  
    YTD BALANCE SHEET AVERAGES                    
    Total assets   $ 1,777,188     $ 1,710,941     $ 1,485,489     $ 1,297,657     $ 1,171,415  
    Earning assets   $ 1,687,249     $ 1,620,015     $ 1,391,179     $ 1,230,553     $ 1,116,861  
    Interest bearing liabilities   $ 1,215,731     $ 1,111,687     $ 858,600     $ 748,472     $ 711,449  
    Total shareholders’ equity   $ 142,796     $ 130,068     $ 120,704     $ 121,659     $ 107,711  
    Total tangible shareholders’ equity   $ 133,470     $ 120,482     $ 110,792     $ 117,991     $ 103,712  
    Earned common shares outstanding     4,459,303       4,428,963       4,425,818       4,630,709       4,665,951  
    Unvested stock grants     28,274       28,530       25,462       21,088       13,966  
    Total common shares outstanding     4,487,577       4,457,493       4,451,280       4,651,797       4,679,917  
    ASSET QUALITY                    
    Nonperforming loans to gross loans (1)     0.71 %     0.24 %     0.12 %     0.82 %     0.07 %
    Nonperforming assets to total assets (1)     0.58 %     0.23 %     0.12 %     0.63 %     0.06 %
    Allowance for credit losses to gross loans (1)     1.02 %     1.04 %     0.90 %     1.03 %     0.95 %
    Net charge-offs (recoveries) to YTD average gross loans     0.18 %   (0.03)%     0.05 %     0.02 %     0.03 %
    Credit loss expense (reversal) to YTD average gross loans     0.13 %     0.01 %     0.19 %   (0.02)%     0.44 %
    CAPITAL RATIOS(1)                    
    Total capital to risk weighted assets     12.48 %     11.59 %     10.96 %     13.63 %     15.57 %
    Tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets     11.42 %     10.51 %     10.07 %     12.64 %     14.40 %
    CET1 capital to risk weighted assets     10.40 %     9.53 %     9.04 %     11.33 %     12.77 %
    Tier 1 leverage ratio     8.78 %     8.58 %     8.91 %     10.21 %     9.86 %
                         
    (1)At end of period                    

    Income Statement Breakdown and Analysis

        Quarter to Date
        9/30/2024   6/30/2024   3/31/2024   12/31/2023   9/30/2023
    Net income   $ 867     $ 1,980     $ 2,790     $ 3,784     $ 3,775  
    Acquisition related items (net of tax)                    
    Other acquisition related expenses     753                          
    Amortization of core deposit intangibles     35       34       36       60       60  
    Total acquisition related items (net of tax)     788       34       36       60       60  
    Other nonrecurring items (net of tax)                    
    Proxy contest related expenses                              
    Prepayment penalties collected     (24 )     (40 )     (58 )     (85 )     (29 )
    Total other nonrecurring items (net of tax)     (24 )     (40 )     (58 )     (85 )     (29 )
    Adjusted net income from operations   $ 1,631     $ 1,974     $ 2,768     $ 3,759     $ 3,806  
                         
    Net interest income   $ 11,992     $ 11,837     $ 12,226     $ 12,507     $ 12,659  
    Prepayment penalties collected     (31 )     (51 )     (73 )     (107 )     (37 )
    Adjusted net interest income   $ 11,961     $ 11,786     $ 12,153     $ 12,400     $ 12,622  
                         
    PERFORMANCE RATIOS                    
    Based on adjusted net income from operations                    
    Earnings per share   $ 0.37     $ 0.44     $ 0.62     $ 0.85     $ 0.86  
    Return on average assets     0.36 %     0.45 %     0.63 %     0.86 %     0.87 %
    Return on average shareholders’ equity     4.47 %     5.57 %     7.92 %     11.03 %     11.37 %
    Return on average tangible shareholders’ equity     4.77 %     5.96 %     8.49 %     11.86 %     12.24 %
    Efficiency ratio     77.45 %     77.15 %     76.65 %     69.06 %     70.31 %
                         
    Based on adjusted net interest income                    
    Yield on average earning assets (FTE)     5.16 %     5.17 %     5.13 %     5.03 %     4.91 %
    Rate on interest bearing liabilities     3.28 %     3.22 %     3.11 %     2.90 %     2.66 %
    Net interest margin to average earning assets (FTE)     2.79 %     2.84 %     2.90 %     2.98 %     3.04 %
                         
        Year to Date September 30   Variance
          2024       2023     Amount   %
    Net income   $ 5,637     $ 10,845     $ (5,208 )   (48.02)%
    Acquisition related items (net of tax)                
    Other acquisition related expenses     753             753     N/M
    Amortization of core deposit intangibles     105       180       (75 )   (41.67)%
    Total acquisition related items (net of tax)     858       180       678     376.67 %
    Other nonrecurring items (net of tax)                
    Proxy contest related expenses           413       (413 )   (100.00)%
    Prepayment penalties collected     (122 )     (133 )     11     (8.27)%
    Total other nonrecurring items (net of tax)     (122 )     280       (402 )   (143.57)%
    Adjusted net income from operations   $ 6,373     $ 11,305     $ (4,932 )   (43.63)%
                     
    Net interest income   $ 36,055     $ 39,087     $ (3,032 )   (7.76)%
    Prepayment penalties collected     (155 )     (169 )     14     (8.28)%
    Adjusted net interest income   $ 35,900     $ 38,918     $ (3,018 )   (7.75)%
                     
    PERFORMANCE RATIOS                
    Based on adjusted net income from operations                
    Earnings per share   $ 1.43     $ 2.55     $ (1.12 )   (43.92)%
    Return on average assets     0.48 %     0.88 %       (0.40)%
    Return on average shareholders’ equity     5.96 %     11.62 %       (5.66)%
    Return on average tangible shareholders’ equity     6.38 %     12.55 %       (6.17)%
    Efficiency ratio     77.08 %     69.06 %       8.02 %
                     
    Based on adjusted net interest income                
    Yield on average earning assets (FTE)     5.16 %     4.83 %       0.33 %
    Rate on interest bearing liabilities     3.20 %     2.35 %       0.85 %
    Net interest margin to average earning assets (FTE)     2.85 %     3.22 %       (0.37)%
                     

    Average Balances, Interest Rate, and Net Interest Income

    The following tables present the daily average amount outstanding for each major category of interest earning assets, nonearning assets, interest bearing liabilities, and noninterest bearing liabilities. These tables also present an analysis of interest income and interest expense for the periods indicated. All interest income is reported on a FTE basis using a federal income tax rate of 21%. Loans in nonaccrual status, for the purpose of the following computations, are included in the average loan balances.

    Net interest income is the amount by which interest income on earning assets exceeds the interest expenses on interest bearing liabilities. Net interest income, which includes loan fees, is influenced by changes in the balance and mix of assets and liabilities and market interest rates. We exert some control over these factors; however, FRB monetary policy and competition have a significant impact. For analytical purposes, net interest income is adjusted to a FTE basis by adding the income tax savings from interest on tax exempt loans, and nontaxable investment securities, thus making period-to-period comparisons more meaningful.

        Three Months Ended
        September 30, 2024   June 30, 2024   September 30, 2023
        Average Balance   Tax Equivalent Interest   Average Yield / Rate   Average Balance   Tax Equivalent Interest   Average Yield / Rate   Average Balance   Tax Equivalent Interest   Average Yield / Rate
    Interest earning assets                                    
    Total loans   $ 1,450,371     $ 19,599   5.38 %   $ 1,462,362     $ 19,550   5.38 %   $ 1,477,343     $ 19,170   5.15 %
    Taxable investment securities     89,175       335   1.49 %     89,751       350   1.57 %     101,549       397   1.55 %
    Nontaxable investment securities     10,580       57   2.14 %     11,059       62   2.25 %     12,670       70   2.19 %
    Interest earning cash and cash equivalents     148,872       2,023   5.41 %     97,511       1,331   5.49 %     43,865       594   5.37 %
    Federal Home Loan Bank stock     9,179       192   8.32 %     9,179       207   9.07 %     11,421       199   6.91 %
    Total earning assets     1,708,177       22,206   5.17 %     1,669,862       21,500   5.18 %     1,646,848       20,430   4.92 %
                                         
    Nonearning assets                                    
    Allowance for credit losses     (15,282 )             (15,300 )             (15,503 )        
    Premises and equipment, net     13,514               13,964               15,210          
    Accrued income and other assets     90,898               94,125               92,955          
    Total assets   $ 1,797,307             $ 1,762,651             $ 1,739,510          
                                         
    Interest bearing liabilities                                    
    Interest bearing demand deposits   $ 460,256     $ 4,054   3.50 %   $ 429,141     $ 3,745   3.51 %   $ 416,500     $ 3,230   3.08 %
    Savings deposits     261,620       416   0.63 %     266,731       408   0.62 %     290,939       429   0.59 %
    Time deposits     336,570       3,865   4.57 %     330,024       3,756   4.58 %     248,389       2,280   3.64 %
    Borrowed funds     179,219       1,867   4.14 %     178,474       1,741   3.92 %     201,007       1,818   3.59 %
    Total interest bearing liabilities     1,237,665       10,202   3.28 %     1,204,370       9,650   3.22 %     1,156,835       7,757   2.66 %
                                         
    Noninterest bearing liabilities                                    
    Noninterest bearing deposits     402,274               405,985               435,398          
    Accrued interest and other liabilities     12,128               9,719               14,417          
    Shareholders’ equity     145,240               142,577               132,860          
    Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity   $ 1,797,307             $ 1,762,651             $ 1,739,510          
    Net interest income (FTE)       $ 12,004           $ 11,850           $ 12,673    
    Net interest margin to earning assets (FTE)           2.80 %           2.85 %           3.05 %
                                         
        Nine Months Ended
        September 30, 2024   September 30, 2023
        Average Balance   Tax Equivalent Interest   Average Yield / Rate   Average Balance   Tax Equivalent Interest   Average Yield / Rate
    Interest earning assets                        
    Total loans   $ 1,461,289     $ 58,758   5.37 %   $ 1,464,959     $ 55,749   5.09 %
    Taxable investment securities     91,041       1,044   1.53 %     106,158       1,250   1.57 %
    Nontaxable investment securities     11,200       186   2.22 %     13,403       227   2.26 %
    Interest earning cash and cash equivalents     114,540       4,673   5.45 %     24,484       955   5.21 %
    Federal Home Loan Bank stock     9,179       600   8.73 %     11,011       515   6.25 %
    Total earning assets     1,687,249       65,261   5.17 %     1,620,015       58,696   4.84 %
                             
    Nonearning assets                        
    Allowance for credit losses     (15,328 )             (15,290 )        
    Premises and equipment, net     13,957               15,342          
    Accrued income and other assets     91,310               90,874          
    Total assets   $ 1,777,188             $ 1,710,941          
                             
    Interest bearing liabilities                        
    Interest bearing demand deposits   $ 436,997     $ 11,358   3.47 %   $ 385,316     $ 7,927   2.75 %
    Savings deposits     266,883       1,237   0.62 %     312,762       1,336   0.57 %
    Time deposits     331,113       11,265   4.54 %     196,838       4,595   3.12 %
    Borrowed funds     180,738       5,307   3.92 %     216,771       5,703   3.52 %
    Total interest bearing liabilities     1,215,731       29,167   3.20 %     1,111,687       19,561   2.35 %
                             
    Noninterest bearing liabilities                        
    Noninterest bearing deposits     408,449               455,069          
    Accrued interest and other liabilities     10,212               14,117          
    Shareholders’ equity     142,796               130,068          
    Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity   $ 1,777,188             $ 1,710,941          
    Net interest income (FTE)       $ 36,094           $ 39,135    
    Net interest margin to earning assets (FTE)           2.86 %           3.23 %
                             

    Volume and Rate Variance Analysis

    The following table sets forth the effect of volume and rate changes on interest income and expense for the periods indicated. For the purpose of this table, changes in interest due to volume and rate were determined as follows:

    Volume – change in volume multiplied by the previous period’s rate.
    Rate – change in the FTE rate multiplied by the previous period’s volume.

    The change in interest due to both volume and rate has been allocated to volume and rate changes in proportion to the relationship of the absolute dollar amounts of the change in each.

        Three Months Ended   Three Months Ended   Nine Months Ended
        September 30, 2024   September 30, 2024   September 30, 2024
        Compared To   Compared To   Compared To
        June 30, 2024   September 30, 2023   September 30, 2023
        Increase (Decrease) Due to   Increase (Decrease) Due to   Increase (Decrease) Due to
        Volume   Rate   Net   Volume   Rate   Net   Volume   Rate   Net
    Changes in interest income                                    
    Total loans   $ 49     $     $ 49     $ (1,847 )   $ 2,276     $ 429     $ (227 )   $ 3,236     $ 3,009  
    Taxable investment securities     (2 )     (13 )     (15 )     (47 )     (15 )     (62 )     (175 )     (31 )     (206 )
    Nontaxable investment securities     (2 )     (3 )     (5 )     (12 )     (1 )     (13 )     (37 )     (4 )     (41 )
    Interest earning cash and cash equivalents     825       (133 )     692       1,424       5       1,429       3,672       46       3,718  
    Federal Home Loan Bank stock           (15 )     (15 )     (161 )     154       (7 )     (137 )     222       85  
    Total changes in interest income     870       (164 )     706       (643 )     2,419       1,776       3,096       3,469       6,565  
                                         
    Changes in interest expense                                    
    Interest bearing demand deposits     380       (71 )     309       359       465       824       1,162       2,269       3,431  
    Savings deposits     (25 )     33       8       (147 )     134       (13 )     (258 )     159       (99 )
    Time deposits     158       (49 )     109       922       663       1,585       4,001       2,669       6,670  
    Borrowed funds     9       117       126       (896 )     945       49       (1,265 )     869       (396 )
    Total changes in interest expense     522       30       552       238       2,207       2,445       3,640       5,966       9,606  
    Net change in net interest income (FTE)   $ 348     $ (194 )   $ 154     $ (881 )   $ 212     $ (669 )   $ (544 )   $ (2,497 )   $ (3,041 )
                                         
        Average Yield/Rate for the Three Months Ended
        9/30/2024   6/30/2024   3/31/2024   12/31/2023   9/30/2023
    Total earning assets   5.17 %   5.18 %   5.15 %   5.06 %   4.92 %
    Total interest bearing liabilities   3.28 %   3.22 %   3.11 %   2.90 %   2.66 %
    Net interest margin to earning assets (FTE)   2.80 %   2.85 %   2.92 %   3.01 %   3.05 %
                         
        Quarter to Date Net Interest Income (FTE)
        9/30/2024   6/30/2024   3/31/2024   12/31/2023   9/30/2023
    Interest income   $ 22,194     $ 21,487     $ 21,541   $ 21,033     $ 20,416  
    FTE adjustment     12       13       14     14       14  
    Total interest income (FTE)     22,206       21,500       21,555     21,047       20,430  
    Total interest expense     10,202       9,650       9,315     8,526       7,757  
    Net interest income (FTE)   $ 12,004     $ 11,850     $ 12,240   $ 12,521     $ 12,673  
                         

    Noninterest Income

        Three Months Ended
        9/30/2024   6/30/2024   3/31/2024   12/31/2023   9/30/2023
    Service charges and fees                    
    Trust and investment services     619       607       641       433       572  
    ATM and debit card     541       545       512       549       568  
    Service charges on deposit accounts     163       162       140       211       244  
    Total     1,323       1,314       1,293       1,193       1,384  
    Net gain on sales of residential mortgage loans     211       177       143       96       164  
    Net gain on sales of commercial loans     133       98       296       226        
    Change in fair value of equity investments     33       (3 )     (10 )     42       (28 )
    Changes in the fair value of MSR     (175 )     (44 )     (96 )     (108 )     119  
    Other                    
    Mortgage servicing fees     389       386       394       398       398  
    Change in cash surrender value of corporate owned life insurance     206       207       204       192       181  
    Other     90       179       131       106       120  
    Total     685       772       729       696       699  
    Total noninterest income   $ 2,210     $ 2,314     $ 2,355     $ 2,145     $ 2,338  
                         
    Memo items:                    
    Residential mortgage operations   $ 425     $ 519     $ 441     $ 386     $ 681  
        Nine Months Ended September 30   Variance
          2024       2023     Amount   %
    Service charges and fees                
    Trust and investment services   $ 1,867     $ 1,704     $ 163     9.57 %
    ATM and debit card     1,598       1,669       (71 )   (4.25)%
    Service charges on deposit accounts     465       686       (221 )   (32.22)%
    Total     3,930       4,059       (129 )   (3.18)%
    Net gain on sales of residential mortgage loans     531       523       8     1.53 %
    Net gain on sales of commercial loans     527       95       432     454.74 %
    Change in fair value of equity investments     20       (29 )     49     (168.97)%
    Changes in the fair value of MSR     (315 )     218       (533 )   (244.50)%
    Other                
    Mortgage servicing fees     1,169       1,210       (41 )   (3.39)%
    Change in cash surrender value of corporate owned life insurance     617       531       86     16.20 %
    Other     400       519       (119 )   (22.93)%
    Total     2,186       2,260       (74 )   (3.27)%
    Total noninterest income   $ 6,879     $ 7,126     $ (247 )   (3.47)%
                     
    Memo items:                
    Residential mortgage operations   $ 1,385     $ 1,951     $ (566 )   (29.01)%
                     

    Residential Mortgage Operations

    Residential mortgage operations includes net gains on sales of loans, changes in the fair value of mortgage servicing rights, and mortgage servicing fees.

    Net gain on sales of residential mortgage loans represents the income earned on the sale of residential mortgage loans into the secondary market. Although elevated interest rates and limited inventories have significantly driven down the volume of new originations and refinancing activity, we continue to actively sell residential mortgage loans into the secondary market. During the third quarter of 2024, residential mortgage originations sold into the secondary market totaled $10,722.

    Changes in the fair value of MSR are highly correlated to changes in interest rates and prepayment speeds. During the third quarter of 2024, the fair value of the servicing portfolio decreased primarily due to a decline in the size of the servicing portfolio, as the portfolio declined by $4,741. Mortgage servicing rights are expected to continue to decline due to likely further reductions in the size of our servicing portfolio as paydowns and maturities are expected to outpace new originations.

    Mortgage servicing fees includes the fees earned for servicing loans that have been sold into the secondary market. The annual decrease in mortgage servicing fees is directly related to the size of the serviced portfolio. Due to reduced levels of secondary market originations and prepayments, the serviced loan portfolio declined by $22,584, or 3.58%, since September 30, 2023. We expect mortgage servicing fees to trend modestly downward in future periods due to decreased secondary market originations.

    All Other Noninterest Income

    Trust and investment services includes income earned from contracts with customers to manage assets for investment and/or to transact on their accounts through the wealth management and trust department. Trust services and wealth management fees are subject to market fluctuations and interest rate changes. We expect trust and investment services fees to modestly increase in future periods.

    ATM and debit card income represents fees earned on ATM and debit card transactions. We expect these fees to approximate current levels in 2024.

    Service charges on deposit accounts includes fees earned from deposit customers for transaction-based charges, account maintenance and overdraft services. These charges have declined in 2024 due to a reduced level of NSF fees charged to customers based on regulatory guidance and overall industry trends. Service charges on deposit accounts are expected to approximate current levels throughout the remainder of the year.

    Net gain on sales of commercial loans represents the income earned from the sale of commercial loans into the secondary market. Throughout 2024, we sold the guaranteed portion of select SBA loans. We anticipate this strategy to continue throughout the remainder of the year.

    Change in cash surrender value of corporate owned life insurance is expected to modestly increase throughout 2024.

    Other includes miscellaneous other income items, none of which are individually significant.

    Noninterest Expenses

        Three Months Ended
        9/30/2024   6/30/2024   3/31/2024   12/31/2023   9/30/2023
    Compensation and benefits   $ 5,839   $ 5,842   $ 6,066   $ 5,521   $ 5,592
    Professional services     799     963     894     695     726
    Furniture and equipment     668     689     727     696     668
    Occupancy     622     605     623     610     591
    Data processing     751     490     547     505     576
    Loan and collection     349     425     322     301     232
    Advertising and promotional     312     337     348     139     506
    Other                    
    Acquisition related expenses     953                
    FDIC insurance premiums     275     327     299     270     330
    ATM and debit card     214     188     171     158     153
    Telephone and communication     95     86     109     103     115
    Amortization of core deposit intangibles     44     44     45     76     75
    Other general and administrative     1,053     925     1,015     1,047     1,030
    Total     2,634     1,570     1,639     1,654     1,703
    Total noninterest expenses   $ 11,974   $ 10,921   $ 11,166   $ 10,121   $ 10,594
                         
        Nine Months Ended
    September 30
      Variance
          2024     2023   Amount   %
    Compensation and benefits   $ 17,747   $ 16,876   $ 871     5.16 %
    Professional services     2,656     2,729     (73 )   (2.67)%
    Furniture and equipment     2,084     2,079     5     0.24 %
    Occupancy     1,850     1,815     35     1.93 %
    Data processing     1,788     1,654     134     8.10 %
    Loan and collection     1,096     929     167     17.98 %
    Advertising and promotional     997     1,466     (469 )   (31.99)%
    Other                
    Acquisition related expenses     953         953     N/M
    FDIC insurance premiums     901     861     40     4.65 %
    ATM and debit card     573     493     80     16.23 %
    Telephone and communication     290     334     (44 )   (13.17)%
    Amortization of core deposit intangibles     133     227     (94 )   (41.41)%
    Other general and administrative     2,993     3,084     (91 )   (2.95)%
    Total     5,843     4,999     844     16.88 %
    Total noninterest expenses   $ 34,061   $ 32,547   $ 1,514     4.65 %
                     

    Compensation and benefits includes salaries, commissions and incentives, employee benefits, and payroll taxes. Compensation and benefits has increased in 2024 due to an increase in the size of the organization, merit increases, and market based adjustments. We expect a modest increase in overall compensation and benefits throughout the remainder of 2024.

    Professional services include expenses relating to third-party professional services. These services include, but are not limited to, regulatory, auditing, consulting, and legal. Professional services expenses are expected to approximate current levels in future periods.

    Furniture and equipment and occupancy expenses primarily consist of depreciation, repairs and maintenance, certain service contracts, and other related items. These expenses are expected to approximate current levels throughout the remainder of 2024.

    Data processing primarily includes the expenses relating to our core data processor. The increase in data processing in the third quarter of 2024 is primarily due to the loss of incentive credits from our core data processor following our proposed merger announcement. Data processing expenses are expected to modestly increase throughout 2024 due to annual contractual increases from our core data processor.

    Loan and collection includes expenses related to the origination and collection of loans. The increase in such expenses in 2024 is due to increased levels of home ownership grants. Loan and collection expenses are expected to approximate current levels in future periods as loan growth is expected to approximate current levels.

    Advertising and promotional expenses includes media costs and any donations or sponsorships. These expenses also include marketing efforts to attract new and expand existing customer loan and deposit account relationships. Total advertising and promotional expenses have declined in 2024 due to the expiration of certain long-term sponsorship commitments. Advertising and promotional expenses are expected to approximate current levels in future periods.

    Acquisition related expenses includes expenses related to our proposed merger with ChoiceOne Financial Services, Inc., which was announced during the third quarter of 2024. These expenses include services rendered for investment banking, legal and accounting. We expect to incur additional acquisition related expenses in future periods.

    FDIC insurance premiums typically fluctuate each period based on the size of the balance sheet, capital position and overall risk profile. FDIC insurance premiums are expected to approximate current levels in future periods.

    ATM and debit card expenses fluctuate based on customer and non-customer utilization of ATMs and customer debit card volumes. We expect these fees to approximate current levels in future periods.

    Telephone and communication includes expenses relating to our communication systems. These expenses are expected to approximate current levels in future periods.

    Amortization of core deposit intangibles relates to the core deposits acquired from Community Bancorp, Inc. on December 31, 2016 and FSB on December 1, 2021. These core deposit intangibles are being amortized using an accelerated sum-of-years-digits method over their estimated useful lives of seven years. The core deposit intangibles associated with the acquisition of Community Bancorp, Inc. were fully amortized as of December 31, 2023. The core deposit intangibles associated with the acquisition of FSB will be amortized through 2028.

    Other general and administrative includes miscellaneous other expense items. Other general and administrative expenses are expected to approximate current levels in future periods.

    Balance Sheet Breakdown and Analysis

        9/30/2024   6/30/2024   3/31/2024   12/31/2023   9/30/2023
    ASSETS                    
    Cash and due from banks   $ 199,717   $ 128,590   $ 132,349   $ 90,661   $ 83,365
    Total investment securities     99,724     100,167     103,210     107,615     109,543
    Residential mortgage loans held-for-sale, at fair value     1,861     2,440     1,067     747     1,037
    Gross loans     1,442,389     1,459,929     1,461,465     1,473,471     1,483,720
    Less allowance for credit losses     14,700     15,300     15,300     15,400     15,400
    Net loans     1,427,689     1,444,629     1,446,165     1,458,071     1,468,320
    All other assets     78,379     80,803     81,838     81,858     82,674
    Total assets   $ 1,807,370   $ 1,756,629   $ 1,764,629   $ 1,738,952   $ 1,744,939
                         
    LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY                    
    Total deposits   $ 1,470,586   $ 1,427,059   $ 1,438,408   $ 1,394,182   $ 1,401,797
    Total borrowed funds     179,970     178,397     178,500     198,500     201,050
    Accrued interest payable and other liabilities     10,416     7,872     6,647     7,568     9,190
    Total liabilities     1,660,972     1,613,328     1,623,555     1,600,250     1,612,037
    Total shareholders’ equity     146,398     143,301     141,074     138,702     132,902
    Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity   $ 1,807,370   $ 1,756,629   $ 1,764,629   $ 1,738,952   $ 1,744,939
                         
        9/30/2024 vs 6/30/2024   9/30/2024 vs 9/30/2023
        Variance   Variance
        Amount   %   Amount   %
    ASSETS                
    Cash and due from banks   $ 71,127     55.31 %   $ 116,352     139.57 %
    Total investment securities     (443 )   (0.44)%     (9,819 )   (8.96)%
    Residential mortgage loans held-for-sale, at fair value     (579 )   (23.73)%     824     79.46 %
    Gross loans     (17,540 )   (1.20)%     (41,331 )   (2.79)%
    Less allowance for credit losses     (600 )   (3.92)%     (700 )   (4.55)%
    Net loans     (16,940 )   (1.17)%     (40,631 )   (2.77)%
    All other assets     (2,424 )   (3.00)%     (4,295 )   (5.20)%
    Total assets   $ 50,741     2.89 %   $ 62,431     3.58 %
                     
    LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY                
    Total deposits   $ 43,527     3.05 %   $ 68,789     4.91 %
    Total borrowed funds     1,573     0.88 %     (21,080 )   (10.48)%
    Accrued interest payable and other liabilities     2,544     32.32 %     1,226     13.34 %
    Total liabilities     47,644     2.95 %     48,935     3.04 %
    Total shareholders’ equity     3,097     2.16 %     13,496     10.15 %
    Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity   $ 50,741     2.89 %   $ 62,431     3.58 %
                     

    Cash and due from banks

        9/30/2024   6/30/2024   3/31/2024   12/31/2023   9/30/2023
    Cash and due from banks                    
    Noninterest bearing   $ 37,871   $ 35,437     $ 26,128   $ 29,997   $ 35,121  
    Interest bearing     161,846     93,153       106,221     60,664     48,244  
    Total   $ 199,717   $ 128,590     $ 132,349   $ 90,661   $ 83,365  
                         
        9/30/2024 vs 6/30/2024       9/30/2024 vs 9/30/2023
        Variance       Variance
        Amount   %       Amount   %
    Cash and due from banks                    
    Noninterest bearing   $ 2,434     6.87 %       $ 2,750     7.83 %
    Interest bearing     68,693     73.74 %         113,602     235.47 %
    Total   $ 71,127     55.31 %       $ 116,352     139.57 %
                         

    Cash and due from banks fluctuates from period to period based on loan demand and variances in deposit account balances.

    Primary and secondary liquidity sources

    The following table outlines our primary and secondary sources of liquidity as of:

        9/30/2024   6/30/2024   3/31/2024   12/31/2023   9/30/2023
    Cash and cash equivalents   $ 199,717   $ 128,590   $ 132,349   $ 90,661   $ 83,365
    Fair value of unpledged investment securities     77,019     74,775     73,680     80,247     82,103
    FHLB borrowing availability     190,000     190,000     190,000     170,000     170,000
    Unsecured lines of credit     23,000     23,000     23,000     20,000     20,000
    Funds available through the Fed Discount Window     109     106     107     111     110
    Parent company line of credit     5,100     7,000     3,500     3,500     950
    Total liquidity sources   $ 494,945   $ 423,471   $ 422,636   $ 364,519   $ 356,528
                         

    The increase in cash and cash equivalents as of September 30, 2024 was due to an increase in total deposits (see “Total deposits” below).

    In addition to the above liquidity sources, we also have the option of utilizing wholesale funding sources, such as brokered NOW accounts, brokered time deposits, and internet time deposits. Although wholesale funding sources are typically more expensive than core deposits and other liquidity sources, they are an integral part of our overall asset and liability management strategy.

    Investment securities

        9/30/2024   6/30/2024   3/31/2024   12/31/2023   9/30/2023
    Available-for-sale                    
    U.S. Government and federal agency   $ 19,432     $ 20,430     $ 20,427     $ 22,425     $ 23,420  
    State and municipal     18,997       19,108       20,403       20,460       20,992  
    Mortgage backed residential     44,086       45,808       47,505       49,076       50,786  
    Certificates of deposit     2,234       2,481       2,729       2,728       3,956  
    Collateralized mortgage obligations – agencies     21,640       22,213       22,778       23,320       24,062  
    Unrealized gain/(loss) on available-for-sale securities     (8,798 )     (12,179 )     (13,027 )     (12,760 )     (15,958 )
    Total available-for-sale     97,591       97,861       100,815       105,249       107,258  
    Held-to-maturity state and municipal     535       791       877       878       879  
    Equity securities     1,598       1,515       1,518       1,488       1,406  
    Total investment securities   $ 99,724     $ 100,167     $ 103,210     $ 107,615     $ 109,543  
                         
        9/30/2024 vs 6/30/2024       9/30/2024 vs 9/30/2023
        Variance       Variance
        Amount   %       Amount   %
    Available-for-sale                    
    U.S. Government and federal agency     (998 )   (4.88)%       $ (3,988 )   (17.03)%
    State and municipal     (111 )   (0.58)%         (1,995 )   (9.50)%
    Mortgage backed residential     (1,722 )   (3.76)%         (6,700 )   (13.19)%
    Certificates of deposit     (247 )   (9.96)%         (1,722 )   (43.53)%
    Collateralized mortgage obligations – agencies     (573 )   (2.58)%         (2,422 )   (10.07)%
    Unrealized gain/(loss) on available-for-sale securities     3,381     (27.76)%         7,160     (44.87)%
    Total available-for-sale     (270 )   (0.28)%         (9,667 )   (9.01)%
    Held-to-maturity state and municipal     (256 )   (32.36)%         (344 )   (39.14)%
    Equity securities     83       5.48 %         192       13.66 %
    Total investment securities   $ (443 )   (0.44)%       $ (9,819 )   (8.96)%
                         

    The amortized cost and fair value of AFS investment securities as of September 30, 2024 were as follows:

        Maturing        
        Due in One Year or Less   After One Year But Within Five Years   After Five Years But Within Ten Years   After Ten Years   Securities with Variable Monthly Payments or Noncontractual Maturities   Total
    U.S. Government and federal agency   $ 6,481   $ 12,951   $   $   $   $ 19,432
    State and municipal     1,624     15,190     1,113     1,070         18,997
    Mortgage backed residential                     44,086     44,086
    Certificates of deposit     2,234                     2,234
    Collateralized mortgage obligations – agencies                     21,640     21,640
    Total amortized cost   $ 10,339   $ 28,141   $ 1,113   $ 1,070   $ 65,726   $ 106,389
    Fair value   $ 10,111   $ 26,620   $ 1,017   $ 1,001   $ 58,842   $ 97,591
                             

    The amortized cost and fair value of HTM investment securities as of September 30, 2024 were as follows:

        Maturing        
        Due in One Year or Less   After One Year But Within Five Years   After Five Years But Within Ten Years   After Ten Years   Securities with Variable Monthly Payments or Noncontractual Maturities   Total
    State and municipal   $ 85   $ 295   $ 155   $   $   $ 535
    Fair value   $ 84   $ 290   $ 152   $   $   $ 526
                             

    Total investment securities have declined in recent periods primarily due to maturities and prepayments. As a result of overall market conditions, we have not replenished maturing securities with new purchases.

    Residential mortgage loans held-for-sale, at fair value

    Loans HFS represent the fair value of loans that have been committed to be sold to the secondary market, but have not yet been delivered. The level of loans HFS fluctuates based on loan demand as well as the timing of loan deliveries to the secondary market.

    Loans and allowance for credit losses

    As outlined in the following tables, our loan portfolio has strategically declined throughout the past 12 months. As a result of current market conditions, we expect minimal loan growth throughout the remainder of 2024. Specifically, our commercial pipeline has declined significantly, and the requests that are being presented are lower dollar balances and often carry an SBA guarantee.

    The following tables outline the composition and changes in the loan portfolio as of:

        9/30/2024   6/30/2024   3/31/2024   12/31/2023   9/30/2023
    Commercial and industrial   $ 109,188     $ 120,331     $ 114,772     $ 118,089     $ 125,330  
    Commercial real estate     855,270       864,200       867,270       870,693       874,870  
    Total commercial loans     964,458       984,531       982,042       988,782       1,000,200  
    Residential mortgage     419,140       418,403       426,762       431,836       431,740  
    Home equity     55,475       53,133       48,568       48,380       47,069  
    Total residential real estate loans     474,615       471,536       475,330       480,216       478,809  
    Consumer     3,316       3,862       4,093       4,473       4,711  
    Gross loans     1,442,389       1,459,929       1,461,465       1,473,471       1,483,720  
    Allowance for credit losses     (14,700 )     (15,300 )     (15,300 )     (15,400 )     (15,400 )
    Loans, net   $ 1,427,689     $ 1,444,629     $ 1,446,165     $ 1,458,071     $ 1,468,320  
                         
    Memo items:                    
    Residential mortgage loans serviced for others   $ 609,113     $ 613,854     $ 619,160     $ 624,765     $ 631,697  
                         
        9/30/2024 vs 6/30/2024       9/30/2024 vs 9/30/2023
        Variance       Variance
        Amount   %       Amount   %
    Commercial and industrial   $ (11,143 )   (9.26)%       $ (16,142 )   (12.88)%
    Commercial real estate     (8,930 )   (1.03)%         (19,600 )   (2.24)%
    Total commercial loans     (20,073 )   (2.04)%         (35,742 )   (3.57)%
    Residential mortgage     737       0.18 %         (12,600 )   (2.92)%
    Home equity     2,342       4.41 %         8,406       17.86 %
    Total residential real estate loans     3,079       0.65 %         (4,194 )   (0.88)%
    Consumer     (546 )   (14.14)%         (1,395 )   (29.61)%
    Gross loans     (17,540 )   (1.20)%         (41,331 )   (2.79)%
    Allowance for credit losses     600     (3.92)%         700     (4.55)%
    Loans, net   $ (16,940 )   (1.17)%       $ (40,631 )   (2.77)%
                         
    Memo items:                    
    Residential mortgage loans serviced for others   $ (4,741 )   (0.77)%       $ (22,584 )   (3.58)%
                         

    The following table presents historical loan balances by portfolio segment as of:

        9/30/2024   6/30/2024   3/31/2024   12/31/2023   9/30/2023
    Loans collectively evaluated                    
    Commercial and industrial   $ 102,523   $ 113,254   $ 112,542   $ 115,665   $ 124,860
    Commercial real estate     854,038     864,026     867,270     870,524     874,701
    Residential mortgage     416,864     416,130     423,881     429,109     428,927
    Home equity     55,416     53,056     48,388     48,136     46,898
    Consumer     3,325     3,862     4,093     4,473     4,711
    Subtotal     1,432,166     1,450,328     1,456,174     1,467,907     1,480,097
    Loans individually evaluated                    
    Commercial and industrial     6,665     7,077     2,230     2,424     470
    Commercial real estate     1,232     174         169     169
    Residential mortgage     2,276     2,273     2,881     2,727     2,813
    Home equity     48     77     180     244     171
    Consumer     2                
    Subtotal     10,223     9,601     5,291     5,564     3,623
    Gross Loans   $ 1,442,389   $ 1,459,929   $ 1,461,465   $ 1,473,471   $ 1,483,720
                         

    The following table presents historical allowance for credit losses allocations by portfolio segment as of:

        9/30/2024   6/30/2024   3/31/2024   12/31/2023   9/30/2023
    Allowance for credit losses for collectively evaluated loans                    
    Commercial and industrial   $ 1,436   $ 1,434   $ 1,300   $ 1,407   $ 1,362
    Commercial real estate     8,347     8,903     8,359     8,467     8,703
    Residential mortgage     4,131     4,133     4,202     4,409     4,439
    Home equity     348     327     305     321     315
    Consumer     51     80     38     44     36
    Unallocated             670     355     294
    Subtotal     14,313     14,877     14,874     15,003     15,149
    Allowance for credit losses for individually evaluated loans                    
    Commercial and industrial     385     423     423     363     248
    Commercial real estate                    
    Residential mortgage             3     34     3
    Home equity                    
    Consumer     2                
    Unallocated                    
    Subtotal     387     423     426     397     251
    Allowance for credit losses   $ 14,700   $ 15,300   $ 15,300   $ 15,400   $ 15,400
                         
    Commercial and industrial   $ 1,784   $ 1,857   $ 1,723   $ 1,770   $ 1,610
    Commercial real estate     8,347     8,903     8,359     8,467     8,703
    Residential mortgage     4,131     4,133     4,205     4,443     4,442
    Home equity     348     327     305     321     315
    Consumer     53     80     38     44     36
    Unallocated             670     355     294
    Allowance for credit losses   $ 14,700   $ 15,300   $ 15,300   $ 15,400   $ 15,400
                         

    Loan concentration analysis

    As a result of current economic conditions, there continues to be a heightened focus in the financial industry for non-owner occupied commercial real estate loans, most specifically retail and office space industries. While we continue to monitor various industries that have been impacted by the pandemic, we also continue to monitor the effects of inflation, supply chain disruption, elevated interest rates, and office space usage associated with an increased remote workforce. The overall credit quality indicators of non-owner occupied commercial real estate loan portfolio have remained strong. Performance is based on debt service coverage ratio, loan to value ratio and payment trends. As of September 30, 2024, there were no delinquencies in the non-owner occupied commercial real estate loan portfolio. We expect the non-owner occupied commercial real estate loan portfolio to experience insignificant growth, if any, in future periods.

    Within the net lease and retail strip center non-owner occupied commercial real estate pools, we have exposure to Rite Aid. During the fourth quarter of 2023, Rite Aid, which operates over 2,000 retail pharmacies across 17 states, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. During the third quarter of 2024, Rite Aid announced that it successfully emerged from bankruptcy protection and will now operate as a private company. However, all Rite Aid stores in Michigan were closed as part of the company’s restructuring. As a result, one commercial real estate loan was partially charged off and its remaining balance was moved to nonaccrual status during the third quarter of 2024. We continue to actively monitor five remaining loans previously associated with Rite Aid.

    With the ongoing pressures on the office sector due to remote work capabilities and less required office space, we continue to monitor the office pool more closely for potential deterioration. It is not expected that there will be much, if any, impact on portfolio performance in this pool in the near future due to existing lease terms, tenant mix, office size, and strong underwriting at origination. Due to current economic uncertainty and the pressures noted above, it is unlikely that we will seek new loan originations in the non-owner occupied office pool in 2024.

    Below is a description of each industry pool within the non-owner occupied commercial real estate loan portfolio:

    Net lease: Loans in this pool represent national credit tenants (or franchisees of the same) or large regional tenants with excellent credit. These loans are typically single tenant net lease credits with strong debt service coverage ratios and lease terms that extend beyond the maturity of the loan.

    Retail strip centers: Loans in this pool represent loans collateralized by retail strip centers. The tenant base within this pool consists primarily of retail space whose average lease periods run between one and ten years. Larger strip centers are usually anchored by a national or regional tenant. Guarantors in this category typically have large liquid reserves.

    Office: Loans in this pool represent loans collateralized by non-owner occupied office buildings. The tenant base includes legal and other professional services whose average lease periods run from three to fifteen years.

    Special use: Loans in this pool represent loans collateralized by special use buildings, which include hotels, motels, assisted living and nursing homes that are not classified as construction or SBA loans.

    Industrial: Loans in this pool represent investment properties used for manufacturing and production.

    Medical office: Loans in this pool represent loans collateralized by non-owner occupied medical office buildings. The tenant base includes medical services whose average lease periods run from three to fifteen years.

    Self storage: Loans in this pool represent self storage buildings. Loan terms are generally five years or less and the lease terms of the units are typically on a month-to-month basis.

    Mixed use: Loans in this pool represent loans collateralized by mixed use real estate. The tenant base within this pool consists primarily of office-retail, office-residential or retail-residential space. The properties are most often purchased by individuals for investment purposes.

    Retail: Loans in this pool represent loans collateralized by single tenant retail buildings whose average lease periods run over five years.

    The following tables present the composition of current and historical non-owner occupied commercial real estate loans, based on loan collateral, by industry pool:

        9/30/2024   6/30/2024   3/31/2024   12/31/2023   9/30/2023
    Net lease   $ 137,406     $ 141,064     $ 147,103   $ 149,056     $ 160,077  
    Retail strip centers     106,948       106,631       107,834     98,588       96,567  
    Office     61,897       62,237       61,657     61,822       62,959  
    Special use     71,307       71,006       58,278     58,710       57,612  
    Industrial     23,338       23,107       22,575     28,380       28,906  
    Medical office     24,551       24,818       25,380     25,842       28,591  
    Self storage     32,797       32,502       25,660     23,455       21,993  
    Mixed use     16,829       16,980       17,174     17,335       19,833  
    Retail     15,183       17,191       12,533     12,981       14,115  
                         
    Total non-owner occupied commercial real estate loans   $ 490,256     $ 495,536     $ 478,194   $ 476,169     $ 490,653  
                         
        9/30/2024 vs 6/30/2024       9/30/2024 vs 9/30/2023
        Variance       Variance
        Amount   %       Amount   %
    Net lease   $ (3,658 )   (2.59)%       $ (22,671 )   (14.16)%
    Retail strip centers     317       0.30 %         10,381       10.75 %
    Office     (340 )   (0.55)%         (1,062 )   (1.69)%
    Special use     301       0.42 %         13,695       23.77 %
    Industrial     231       1.00 %         (5,568 )   (19.26)%
    Medical office     (267 )   (1.08)%         (4,040 )   (14.13)%
    Self storage     295       0.91 %         10,804       49.12 %
    Mixed use     (151 )   (0.89)%         (3,004 )   (15.15)%
    Retail     (2,008 )   (11.68)%         1,068       7.57 %
                         
    Total non-owner occupied commercial real estate loans   $ (5,280 )   (1.07)%       $ (397 )   (0.08)%
                         

    The following table presents the average loan size of current and historical non-owner occupied commercial real estate loans, based on loan collateral, by industry pool:

        9/30/2024   6/30/2024   3/31/2024   12/31/2023   9/30/2023
    Net lease   $ 1,383   $ 1,291   $ 1,311   $ 1,316   $ 1,300
    Retail strip centers     2,379     2,197     2,231     2,135     2,115
    Office     1,370     1,363     1,296     1,297     1,294
    Special use     2,612     2,546     2,064     2,079     2,134
    Industrial     933     925     941     1,092     1,072
    Medical office     1,116     1,128     1,103     1,078     1,145
    Self storage     1,923     1,926     1,509     1,380     1,692
    Mixed use     1,324     1,334     1,321     1,333     1,240
    Retail     407     513     447     461     429
                         
    Total non-owner occupied commercial real estate loans   $ 1,489   $ 1,448   $ 1,392   $ 1,379   $ 1,362
                         

    The following table presents current and historical non-owner occupied commercial real estate loans, based on loan collateral, by industry pool as a percentage of gross loans:

        9/30/2024   6/30/2024   3/31/2024   12/31/2023   9/30/2023
    Net lease   9.53 %   9.66 %   10.07 %   10.12 %   10.79 %
    Retail strip centers   7.41 %   7.30 %   7.38 %   6.69 %   6.51 %
    Office   4.29 %   4.26 %   4.22 %   4.20 %   4.24 %
    Special use   4.94 %   4.86 %   3.99 %   3.98 %   3.88 %
    Industrial   1.62 %   1.58 %   1.54 %   1.93 %   1.95 %
    Medical office   1.70 %   1.70 %   1.74 %   1.75 %   1.93 %
    Self storage   2.27 %   2.23 %   1.76 %   1.59 %   1.48 %
    Mixed use   1.17 %   1.16 %   1.18 %   1.18 %   1.34 %
    Retail   1.05 %   1.18 %   0.86 %   0.88 %   0.95 %
                         
    Total non-owner occupied commercial real estate loans to gross loans   33.98 %   33.93 %   32.74 %   32.32 %   33.07 %
                         

    Asset quality

    The following table summarizes our current, past due, and nonaccrual loans as of:

        9/30/2024   6/30/2024   3/31/2024   12/31/2023   9/30/2023
    Accruing interest                    
    Current   $ 1,428,014   $ 1,445,780   $ 1,451,432   $ 1,463,668   $ 1,477,386
    Past due 30-89 days     4,152     4,534     4,344     4,239     2,711
    Past due 90 days or more         14     398        
    Total accruing interest     1,432,166     1,450,328     1,456,174     1,467,907     1,480,097
    Nonaccrual     10,223     9,601     5,291     5,564     3,623
    Total loans   $ 1,442,389   $ 1,459,929   $ 1,461,465   $ 1,473,471   $ 1,483,720
    Total loans past due and in nonaccrual status   $ 14,375   $ 14,149   $ 10,033   $ 9,803   $ 6,334
                         

    The following table summarizes the our nonperforming assets as of:

        9/30/2024   6/30/2024   3/31/2024   12/31/2023   9/30/2023
    Nonaccrual loans   $ 10,223   $ 9,601   $ 5,291   $ 5,564   $ 3,623
    Accruing loans past due 90 days or more         14     398        
    Total nonperforming loans     10,223     9,615     5,689     5,564     3,623
    Other real estate owned     293     293     345     597     345
    Total nonperforming assets   $ 10,516   $ 9,908   $ 6,034   $ 6,161   $ 3,968
                         

    The following table summarizes our charge-offs, recoveries and allowance for credit losses as of, and for the three-month periods ended:

        9/30/2024   6/30/2024   3/31/2024   12/31/2023   9/30/2023
    Total charge-offs   $ 1,814   $ 814   $ 86     $ 110     $ 16  
    Total recoveries     11     18     29       300       455  
    Net charge-offs (recoveries)   $ 1,803   $ 796   $ 57     $ (190 )   $ (439 )
    Allowance for credit losses   $ 1,203   $ 796   $ (43 )   $ (190 )   $ (309 )
                         

    During the third quarter of 2024, we partially charged off one commercial real estate loan for $1,443 related to the Rite Aid bankruptcy filing. We believe that the credit characteristics are unique and are not an indication of softening in the remainder of our commercial loan portfolio.

    The following table summarizes the our primary asset quality measures as of:

        9/30/2024   6/30/2024   3/31/2024   12/31/2023   9/30/2023
    Nonperforming loans to gross loans   0.71 %   0.66 %   0.39 %   0.38 %   0.24 %
    Nonperforming assets to total assets   0.58 %   0.56 %   0.34 %   0.35 %   0.23 %
    Allowance for credit losses to gross loans   1.02 %   1.05 %   1.05 %   1.05 %   1.04 %
    Net charge-offs (recoveries) to QTD average gross loans   0.12 %   0.05 %   %   (0.01)%   (0.03)%
    Credit loss expense (reversal) to QTD average gross loans   0.08 %   0.05 %   %   (0.01)%   (0.02)%
                         

    The following table summarizes the average loan size as of:

        9/30/2024   6/30/2024   3/31/2024   12/31/2023   9/30/2023
    Commercial and industrial   $ 310   $ 343   $ 326   $ 334   $ 353
    Commercial real estate     901     906     900     905     896
    Total commercial loans     740     754     746     752     751
    Residential mortgage     235     234     234     236     234
    Home equity     58     56     53     53     52
    Total residential real estate loans     173     173     174     175     174
    Consumer     12     13     13     13     12
    Gross loans   $ 335   $ 337   $ 336   $ 337   $ 335
                         

    All other assets

    The following tables outline the composition and changes in other assets as of:

        9/30/2024   6/30/2024   3/31/2024   12/31/2023   9/30/2023
    Premises and equipment, net   $ 13,203     $ 13,661     $ 14,111   $ 14,561     $ 14,928  
    Federal Home Loan Bank stock     9,179       9,179       9,179     9,179       9,179  
    Corporate owned life insurance     28,129       27,877       27,670     27,466       27,274  
    Mortgage servicing rights     8,461       8,636       8,680     8,776       8,884  
    Accrued interest receivable     4,354       4,747       4,869     4,472       4,485  
    Goodwill     8,853       8,853       8,853     8,853       8,853  
    Other assets                    
    Core deposit intangibles     400       444       488     533       609  
    Right-of-use assets     1,062       1,142       1,237     1,333       1,426  
    Other real estate owned     293       293       345     597       345  
    Other     4,445       5,971       6,406     6,088       6,691  
    Total     6,200       7,850       8,476     8,551       9,071  
    All other assets   $ 78,379     $ 80,803     $ 81,838   $ 81,858     $ 82,674  
                         
        9/30/2024 vs 6/30/2024       9/30/2024 vs 9/30/2023
        Variance       Variance
        Amount   %       Amount   %
    Premises and equipment, net   $ (458 )   (3.35)%       $ (1,725 )   (11.56)%
    Federal Home Loan Bank stock           %               %
    Corporate owned life insurance     252       0.90 %         855       3.13 %
    Mortgage servicing rights     (175 )   (2.03)%         (423 )   (4.76)%
    Accrued interest receivable     (393 )   (8.28)%         (131 )   (2.92)%
    Goodwill           %               %
    Other assets                    
    Core deposit intangibles     (44 )   (9.91)%         (209 )   (34.32)%
    Right-of-use assets     (80 )   (7.01)%         (364 )   (25.53)%
    Other real estate owned           %         (52 )   (15.07)%
    Other     (1,526 )   (25.56)%         (2,246 )   (33.57)%
    Total     (1,650 )   (21.02)%         (2,871 )   (31.65)%
    All other assets   $ (2,424 )   (3.00)%       $ (4,295 )   (5.20)%
                         

    The annual decrease in premises and equipment was due to depreciation on our existing premises and equipment.

    Total deposits

    The following tables outline the composition and changes in the deposit portfolio as of:

        9/30/2024   6/30/2024   3/31/2024   12/31/2023   9/30/2023
    Noninterest bearing demand   $ 398,338     $ 404,521     $ 401,518   $ 423,019     $ 425,820  
    Interest bearing                    
    Savings     264,337       262,538       274,922     273,302       293,310  
    Money market demand     250,715       230,304       229,584     223,827       225,138  
    NOW                    
    Retail NOW     202,030       205,383       203,614     178,892       198,271  
    Brokered NOW                            
                         
    Total NOW Accounts     202,030       205,383       203,614     178,892       198,271  
    Time deposits                    
    Other time deposits     294,862       264,009       268,466     234,838       198,509  
    Brokered time deposits     60,304       60,304       60,304     60,304       60,251  
    Internet time deposits                           498  
                         
    Total time deposits     355,166       324,313       328,770     295,142       259,258  
                         
    Total deposits   $ 1,470,586     $ 1,427,059     $ 1,438,408   $ 1,394,182     $ 1,401,797  
                         
        9/30/2024 vs 6/30/2024       9/30/2024 vs 9/30/2023
        Variance       Variance
        Amount   %       Amount   %
    Noninterest bearing demand   $ (6,183 )   (1.53)%       $ (27,482 )   (6.45)%
    Interest bearing                    
    Savings     1,799       0.69 %         (28,973 )   (9.88)%
    Money market demand     20,411       8.86 %         25,577       11.36 %
    NOW                    
    Retail NOW     (3,353 )   (1.63)%         3,759       1.90 %
    Brokered NOW           %               %
                         
    Total NOW Accounts     (3,353 )   (1.63)%         3,759       1.90 %
    Time deposits                    
    Other time deposits     30,853       11.69 %         96,353       48.54 %
    Brokered time deposits           %         53       0.09 %
    Internet time deposits           %         (498 )   (100.00)%
                         
    Total time deposits     30,853       9.51 %         95,908       36.99 %
                         
    Total deposits   $ 43,527       3.05 %       $ 68,789       4.91 %
                         

    Between March 2022 and July 2023, the FOMC raised its target federal funds rate 11 times, from a target range of 0.00-0.25% to 5.25-5.50%, or 525 basis points, in order to combat rising inflation. This rapid increase in interest rates led to significant competition amongst financial institutions for deposits. In September 2024, the FOMC lowered the target federal funds rate 50 basis points to a target range of 4.75-5.00%. Due to the overall uncertainty regarding potential rate changes in the future, customers have not sought out long-term funds, leading to a shift in demand to higher-yielding non-maturity deposit accounts as well as short-term time deposits.

    Total borrowed funds

    The following tables outline the composition and changes in borrowed funds as of:

        9/30/2024   6/30/2024   3/31/2024   12/31/2023   9/30/2023
    Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings   $ 160,000   $ 160,000     $ 160,000   $ 180,000     $ 180,000  
    Subordinated debentures     14,000     14,000       14,000     14,000       14,000  
    Other borrowings     5,970     4,397       4,500     4,500       7,050  
    Total borrowed funds   $ 179,970   $ 178,397     $ 178,500   $ 198,500     $ 201,050  
                         
        9/30/2024 vs 6/30/2024       9/30/2024 vs 9/30/2023
        Variance       Variance
        Amount   %       Amount   %
    Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings   $     %       $ (20,000 )   (11.11)%
    Subordinated debentures         %               %
    Other borrowings     1,573     35.77 %         (1,080 )   (15.32)%
    Total borrowed funds   $ 1,573     0.88 %       $ (21,080 )   (10.48)%
                         

    We utilize a mix of borrowed funds and organic deposit growth to fund loan demand. As loan growth has slowed in recent periods, our reliance on FHLB advances has declined.

    Wholesale funding sources

    Although we have been successful at growing market deposits, we utilize wholesale funding sources when necessary to fill gaps when asset growth outpaces deposit growth. Our wholesale funding sources include Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings, correspondent Fed Funds lines and brokered deposits. Although wholesale funding sources are typically more expensive than core deposits, they are an integral part of our funding.

    The following tables outline the composition and changes in wholesale funding sources as of:

        9/30/2024   6/30/2024   3/31/2024   12/31/2023   9/30/2023
    Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings   $ 160,000   $ 160,000     $ 160,000   $ 180,000     $ 180,000  
    Subordinated debentures     14,000     14,000       14,000     14,000       14,000  
    Other borrowings     5,970     4,397       4,500     4,500       7,050  
    Brokered NOW accounts                          
    Brokered time deposits     60,304     60,304       60,304     60,304       60,251  
    Internet time deposits                         498  
    Total wholesale funds   $ 240,274   $ 238,701     $ 238,804   $ 258,804     $ 261,799  
                         
        9/30/2024 vs 6/30/2024       9/30/2024 vs 9/30/2023
        Variance       Variance
        Amount   %       Amount   %
    Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings   $     %         (20,000 )   (11.11)%
    Subordinated debentures         %               %
    Other borrowings     1,573     35.77 %         (1,080 )   (15.32)%
    Brokered NOW accounts       N/A             N/A
    Brokered time deposits         %         53       0.09 %
    Internet time deposits       N/A         (498 )   (100.00)%
    Total wholesale funds   $ 1,573     0.66 %       $ (21,525 )   (8.22)%
                         

    Accrued interest payable and other liabilities

    Accrued interest payable and other liabilities includes accrued interest payable, federal income taxes payable, deferred federal income taxes payable, and all other liabilities (none of which are individually significant).

    Total shareholders’ equity

    We are considered a “well-capitalized” institution, as our capital ratios exceed the minimum designated standards necessary in accordance with Basel III guidelines. As of September 30, 2024, the Bank’s total capital ratio was 12.78%, tier 1 capital ratio was 11.72%, and tier 1 leverage ratio was 9.02%. The minimum requirements to be considered well-capitalized are a total capital ratio of 10.00%, tier 1 capital ratio of 8.00%, and tier 1 leverage ratio of 5.00%. While we continue to be considered well-capitalized, we are focused on enhancing our capital ratios through earnings of the Bank as well as asset growth moderation strategies in 2024.

    The following tables outline the composition and changes in shareholders’ equity as of:

        9/30/2024   6/30/2024   3/31/2024   12/31/2023   9/30/2023
    Common stock   $ 74,826     $ 74,690     $ 74,555     $ 74,230     $ 74,118  
    Retained earnings     78,467       78,094       76,607       74,309       70,972  
    Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income     (6,895 )     (9,483 )     (10,088 )     (9,837 )     (12,188 )
    Total shareholders’ equity   $ 146,398     $ 143,301     $ 141,074     $ 138,702     $ 132,902  
                         
        9/30/2024 vs 6/30/2024       9/30/2024 vs 9/30/2023
        Variance       Variance
        Amount   %       Amount   %
    Common stock   $ 136       0.18 %       $ 708       0.96 %
    Retained earnings     373       0.48 %         7,495       10.56 %
    Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income     2,588     (27.29)%         5,293     (43.43)%
    Total shareholders’ equity   $ 3,097       2.16 %       $ 13,496       10.15 %
                         

    The Board of Directors has authorized the repurchase of up to $10,000 of common stock. As of September 30, 2024, we had $1,393 of common stock available to repurchase through the program. We did not execute any repurchases of our common stock during 2024.

    Stock Performance

    The following table compares the cumulative total shareholder return on our common stock for the year-to-date, 1 year, 3 year, and 5 year periods ended September 30, 2024. The National OTC Peer Group was developed by selecting all OTC traded bank holding companies with total assets between $1 billion and $3 billion as of 03/31/2024 that had a quoted stock price on Bloomberg. The Midwest / Great Lakes OTC Peer Group represents those institutions included in the National OTC Peer Group that are headquartered in Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.

      # in Peer Group   YTD   1 Year   3 Year   5 Year
    Fentura Financial, Inc. (OTCQX:FETM)     45.40 %   67.28 %   59.12 %   100.80 %
                       
    National OTC Peers 43   (1.01)%   (3.49)%   2.11 %   8.44 %
    Fentura Ranking out of 44     1     1     4     4  
                       
    Midwest / Great Lakes OTC Peers 17   (1.97)%   (5.16)%   (1.63)%   1.35 %
    Fentura Ranking out of 18     1     1     1     1  
                       

    Abbreviations and Acronyms

    ABA: American Bankers Association FTE: Fully taxable equivalent
    ACH: Automated Clearing House GAAP: Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
    ACL: Allowance for credit losses HFS: Held-for-sale
    AFS: Available-for-sale HTM: Held-to-maturity
    AIR: Accrued interest receivable HFS: Held-for-sale
    AOCI: Accumulated other comprehensive income HTM: Held-to-maturity
    ARRC: Alternative Reference Rates Committee IRA: Individual retirement account
    ASC: Accounting Standards Codification ITM: Interactive Teller Machine
    ASU: Accounting Standards Update LIBOR: London Interbank Offered Rate
    ATM: Automated teller machine MSR: Mortgage servicing rights
    CDI: Core deposit intangible N/M: Not meaningful
    CET1: Common equity tier 1 NASDAQ: National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotations
    COLI: Corporate owned life insurance NOW: Negotiable order of withdrawal
    DRIP: Dividend Reinvestment Plan NSF: Non-sufficient funds
    EPS: Earnings Per Common Share OCI: Other comprehensive income
    ESOP: Employee Stock Ownership Plan OIS: Overnight Index Swap
    FASB: Financial Accounting Standards Board OREO: Other real estate owned
    FDIC: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation OTTI: Other-than-temporary impairment
    FHLB: Federal Home Loan Bank QTD: Quarter-to-date
    FHLLC: Fentura Holdings LLC SAB: Staff Accounting Bulletin
    FHLMC: Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation SBA: U.S. Small Business Administration
    FNMA: Federal National Mortgage Association SEC: Securities and Exchange Commission
    FOMC: Federal Open Market Committee SERP: Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
    FRB: Federal Reserve Bank SOFR: Secured Overnight Funding Rate
    FSB: Farmers State Bank of Munith TLM: Troubled loan modifications
       

    About Fentura Financial, Inc. and The State Bank

    Fentura Financial, Inc. is the holding company for The State Bank. It was formed in 1987 and is traded on the OTCQX exchange under the symbol FETM, and has been recognized as one of the Top 50 performing stocks on that exchange.

    The State Bank is a 5-Star Bauer Financial rated commercial, retail and trust bank headquartered in Fenton, Michigan. It currently operates 20 full-service offices and one loan production center serving Bay, Genesee, Ingham, Jackson, Livingston, Oakland, Saginaw, and Shiawassee counties. The State Bank believes in the potential of banking to help create better lives, better businesses, and better communities, and works to achieve this through its full array of consumer, mortgage, SBA, commercial and wealth management banking and advisory services, together with philanthropic and volunteer support to organizations and groups within the communities it serves. More information can be found at www.thestatebank.com or www.fentura.com.

    Cautionary Statement: This press release contains certain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements concerning future growth in earning assets and net income. Such statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to, economic, competitive, governmental and technological factors affecting the Company’s operations, markets, products, services, interest rates and fees for services. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this press release.

    Contacts:  Ronald L. Justice  Aaron D. Wirsing
      President & CEO Chief Financial Officer
      Fentura Financial, Inc.   Fentura Financial, Inc.
      810.714.3902 810.714.3925
      ron.justice@thestatebank.com aaron.wirsing@thestatebank.com

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI USA: In Bipartisan Push, Congressman Mfume, Maryland, Virginia Lawmakers Call on President to Address Venezuelan Crab Imports

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Kweisi Mfume (MD-07)

    WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, U.S. Congressman Kweisi Mfume (D-Md.), Senators Chris Van Hollen, Ben Cardin (both D-Md.), Mark Warner, and Tim Kaine (both D-Va.) along with U.S. Representatives Dutch Ruppersberger (D-Md.), John Sarbanes (D-Md.), Rob Wittman (R-Va.), Andy Harris (R-Md.), , David Trone (D-Md.), and Glenn Ivey (D-Md.) wrote to President Joe Biden outlining their concerns with the recent surge of crabmeat imports from Venezuela and its impact on the Chesapeake Bay region’s seafood economy as well as public health. In their letter, the lawmakers urge the President to launch an investigation through the International Trade Commission into the harm that these imports pose to our domestic seafood industry, and press the Administration to encourage a fairer seafood trade relationship. 

    “We write to express our significant concerns with the influx of crabmeat from Venezuela, which has threatened the viability of local fisheries across the Chesapeake Bay. Domestic seafood producers in Maryland and Virginia have experienced significant strain due to the influx of imported Venezuelan crabmeat, some of which is mislabeled and contaminated. In 2018, Venezuelan crabmeat mislabeled as originating from Maryland caused an outbreak of foodborne illnesses, resulting in multiple hospitalizations,” the lawmakers began.

    Highlighting the economic damage caused by Venezuelan imports, they wrote, “Since then, the supply of imported crabmeat has increased, threatening the future livelihood of domestic industry and creating the conditions for a 62 percent decrease in the domestic supply. This has harmed crab fishing industries throughout the Chesapeake Bay, which produces 50 percent of the United States’ total blue crab harvest, a proportion that is now diminishing year over year. There are now fewer than 20 Maryland crab picking and seafood processing companies, down from 53 in 1995.”

    They go on to urge the President to:

    1. Direct the United States International Trade Commission to conduct an investigation, per Section 201 of the Trade Act of 1974, looking into the harm caused by Venezuelan crabmeat imports and recommending remedies.

    2. Use the full array of informal actions available to you to address this trade issue, including through negotiations, utilization of World Trade Organization Committees, bilateral dialogues, and other activities.

    The full text of the letter is available here and below.

    Dear President Biden:

    We write to express our significant concerns with the influx of crabmeat from Venezuela, which has threatened the viability of local fisheries across the Chesapeake Bay. Domestic seafood producers in Maryland and Virginia have experienced significant strain due to the influx of imported Venezuelan crabmeat, some of which is mislabeled and contaminated. In 2018, Venezuelan crabmeat mislabeled as originating from Maryland caused an outbreak of foodborne illnesses, resulting in multiple hospitalizations. Since then, the supply of imported crabmeat has increased, threatening the future livelihood of domestic industry and creating the conditions for a 62 percent decrease in the domestic supply. This has harmed crab fishing industries throughout the Chesapeake Bay, which produces 50 percent of the United States’ total blue crab harvest, a proportion that is now diminishing year over year. There are now fewer than 20 Maryland crab picking and seafood processing companies, down from 53 in 1995.

    Chesapeake Bay crab fisheries and processors follow a strict set of regulations to ensure that the Bay remains one of the most sustainable crab fisheries in the world, that the blue crabs harvested there are of the highest quality, and that the industry does no harm to other species. Foreign competitors often confront little or no such regulation. Not only does this imbalance put local fisheries and seafood businesses at a steep disadvantage, it can also put consumers at increased risk. Consumers are often misled about what they are eating, and sometimes even made sick, as was the case when imported Venezuelan crabmeat was linked with multiple cases of Vibrio parahaemolyticus infections.

    We urge your Administration to use all of the tools at its disposal to remedy this unsustainable situation. Specifically, we urge you to:

    1. Direct the United States International Trade Commission to conduct an investigation, per Section 201 of the Trade Act of 1974, looking into the harm caused by Venezuelan crabmeat imports and recommending remedies.

    2. Use the full array of informal actions available to you to address this trade issue, including through negotiations, utilization of World Trade Organization Committees, bilateral dialogues, and other activities. 

    The Chesapeake Bay crab industry has faced numerous challenges, and the region has worked hard to preserve the blue crab population over the years. This industry carries unique cultural importance for the broader Mid-Atlantic region, enriching and enhancing the regional culinary landscape. Without the federal government stepping in to protect American manufacturers from unfair competition, they might not make it through this crisis. If they do not, Maryland, Virginia, and the country, will be all the poorer for it.

    Sincerely,

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Canada: Building small business opportunity in Prince Edward Island

    Source: Government of Canada News (2)

    West Prince Ventures is helping Island companies prepare for growth  

    October 24, 2024 · Alberton, Prince Edward Island · Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency (ACOA)

    Entrepreneurs and small businesses propel the economy in Canada and bring job opportunities to rural communities. Support in the early stages of business development is vital to ensuring long-term, sustainable growth. Through Community Business Development Corporations (CBDCs), the Government of Canada provides expertise and delivers essential programs to businesses throughout the Atlantic region.

    Improving access to professional services

    Today, Bobby Morrissey, Member of Parliament for Egmont, announced a non-repayable contribution of $305,150 to West Prince Ventures (CBDC Western PEI) to deliver the Consultant Advisory Services (CAS) program, in partnership with CBDC East and CBDC Central, from 2024 through to the end of March 2026. The announcement was made on behalf of the Honourable Gudie Hutchings, Minister of Rural Economic Development and Minister responsible for ACOA.

    The investment will help up to 60 companies across Prince Edward Island with their next stage of growth through access to professional services for business planning and management, market readiness, export growth, and technology adoption.

    From October 20 to 26, during Small Business Week 2024, Canadians are celebrating the crucial role that local companies play in building and strengthening communities.

    Today’s announcement demonstrates the Government of Canada’s commitment to job growth and capacity building in rural Atlantic Canada.

    Connor Burton
    Press Secretary
    Office of the Minister of Rural Economic Development and of the
    Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency
    Connor.Burton@acoa-apeca.gc.ca

    MIL OSI Canada News

  • MIL-OSI: Mountain America’s Sixth Annual Month of Caring Makes a Positive Impact Across Six States

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    A Media Snippet accompanying this announcement is available by clicking on this link.

    SANDY, Utah, Oct. 25, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Mountain America Credit Union recently wrapped up its sixth annual Month of Caring, held annually in September. An inspirational initiative, Month of Caring epitomizes the core philosophy of “people helping people,” a value deeply embedded in the credit union. Throughout the month, Mountain America team members across Arizona, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, and Utah were granted paid time off to engage in various charitable endeavors.

    Month of Caring provides an opportunity for Mountain America employees to connect with their local communities and make a meaningful impact. Since its inception in 2019, the initiative has grown significantly, with team members contributing more than 20,400 service hours to various charitable organizations. In 2024, team members dedicated 3,800 volunteer hours, the equivalent of 475 workdays, and counting.

    “Month of Caring is a testament to our commitment to community service,” said Sterling Nielsen, president and chief executive officer at Mountain America. “Our employees’ dedication to making a positive impact is truly inspiring, and we are proud to support their efforts year-round.”

    Mountain America team members actively engaged in a wide variety of service projects during the Month of Caring. Highlights from this year’s activities include:

    Hygiene kits for kids: Team members assembled 2,500 hygiene kits for the Young Caring for Our Young Foundation. which will be given to homeless children or kids living in poverty.

    Animal shelters: Volunteers supported various animal shelters, including the Humane Society of Utah’s Barktoberfest celebration.

    USANA Kids Eat: Team members packed nearly 800 backpacks to food-insecure kids have access to meals and snacks outside of school.

    Utah’s Hogle Zoo: Volunteers supported a variety of tasks to help keep the zoo functioning at a high level, benefiting both the animals and the families who visit. Service included prepping and freezing food for animals, weeding and planting, painting animal care areas and the zoo boardwalk, and replacing soil, grave and mulch in animal areas.

    Supporting veterans: Through Project Sanctuary and Hope for the Warriors, team members helped at a veteran family retreat and made thank you cards for service members.

    Courage Reins: Team members helped this equine-assisted therapy charity by cleaning pastures and an arena, and prepping toys and educational materials for upcoming clients.

    September 11 commemoration: Team members assisted with events to honor this day.

    Teaching golf: Volunteers taught golf to children through the Fremont County Junior Golf Association.

    “Month of Caring highlights our ongoing commitment to community involvement,” said Trent Savage, senior vice president and chief human resources officer at Mountain America. “It’s rewarding to see our employees actively contributing to the well-being of the communities where we live and work.”

    The total hours served across the organization will continue to increase through the year’s end. While serving the community is encouraged during Month of Caring, team members aren’t limited to using their hours only in the month of September. This gives teams flexibility and control over when and where they utilize their service hours as well as maintaining adequate staff within branches.

    To learn more about Mountain America’s community involvement, visit macu.com/newsroom.

    About Mountain America Credit Union
    With more than 1 million members and $20 billion in assets, Mountain America Credit Union helps its members define and achieve their financial dreams. Mountain America provides consumers and businesses with a variety of convenient, flexible products and services, as well as sound, timely advice. Members enjoy access to secure, cutting-edge mobile banking technology, over 100 branches across six states, and more than 50,000 surcharge-free ATMs. Mountain America—guiding you forward. Learn more at macu.com.

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Canada: Governments strengthening Ontario’s food supply system

    Source: Government of Canada News

    News release

    365 agri-food businesses will receive funding to enhance operational resilience to diseases and pests

    October 25, 2024 – Toronto, Ontario – Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada

    The governments of Canada and Ontario are investing up to $7.5 million to support 365 projects that will help the province’s farmers, food processors, and essential farm-supporting agribusinesses protect their operations against pests and diseases while enhancing operational resilience and strengthening public trust in our food supply system.

    The funding through the Biosecurity Enhancement Initiative, combined with cost-shared investments by the sector, is expected to generate up to $31.5 million in total biosecurity enhancements across Ontario’s agri-food sector.

    Under the initiative, farmers, processors, and select farm-supporting agri-food businesses were eligible for cost-share funding ranging from 35% to 50%, depending on the project category. Supported activities include the implementation of technologies that reduce the spread of animal and plant diseases and capital upgrades that enhance biosecurity (such as constructing isolation facilities and wash bays).

    Examples of projects include:

    • Up to $50,000 for a sheep farm in Clarington to build a new barn to improve its on-farm isolation and separation processes.
    • Up to $50,000 for an Ottawa-area farm to purchase and implement an electronic traceability collection system to improve biosecurity and animal health for its cattle farming operation.
    • Up to $29,353 for a berry farm in Niagara Region for a steam treatment system to eliminate damaging pests and diseases.

    This initiative is funded through the Sustainable Canadian Agricultural Partnership (Sustainable CAP), a 5-year, $3.5-billion investment by federal, provincial and territorial governments to strengthen competitiveness, innovation, and resiliency of Canada’s agriculture, agri‐food and agri‐based products sector. This includes $1 billion in federal programs and activities and a $2.5-billion commitment that is cost-shared 60% federally and 40% provincially/territorially for programs that are designed and delivered by provinces and territories.

    Quotes

    “Keeping our food safe while applying best management practices is vital to ensuring Ontario’s agri-food system continues to thrive. These projects will help enhance biosecurity along our supply chains so we can keep feeding Canadians, and the world.”

    – The Honourable Lawrence MacAulay, Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food

    “Maintaining and strengthening Ontario’s world-class food safety system is the number one priority for this ministry. This initiative builds on our government’s consistent record of enhancing the resilience of Ontario’s food supply chains and boosting our standing as a globally trusted producer of agri-food commodities and goods.”

    – Rob Flack, Ontario Minister of Agriculture, Food and Agribusiness

    “We are pleased with the government’s Biosecurity Enhancement Initiative, which has enabled 70 producers to enhance biosecurity measures on their farms. This funding plays an important role in protecting the health of our livestock, ensuring the long-term sustainability of our industry, and maintaining confidence in the safety of Ontario-produced pork. By investing in biosecurity, we are strengthening our farms and safeguarding our food system against potential threats.”

    – Tara Terpstra, Board Chair, Ontario Pork

    Quick facts

    • Enhancing the sector’s ability to anticipate, mitigate and respond to diseases and pests was a key priority set for Sustainable CAP by the federal-provincial-territorial agricultural ministers in The Guelph Statement.

    • In 2023, Ontario’s agri-food industry contributed almost $51 billion in GDP to the provincial economy and employed over 871,000 people.

    Associated links

    Contacts

    For media:

    Annie Cullinan
    Director of Communications
    Office of the Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food
    annie.cullinan@agr.gc.ca

    Media Relations
    Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada
    Ottawa, Ontario
    613-773-7972
    1-866-345-7972
    aafc.mediarelations-relationsmedias.aac@agr.gc.ca
    Follow us on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, and LinkedIn
    Web: Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada

    Makena Mahoney
    Minister’s Office
    Makena.Mahoney@ontario.ca

    Meaghan Evans
    Communications Branch
    OMAFRA.media@ontario.ca
    519-826-3145

    MIL OSI Canada News

  • MIL-OSI USA: HOYLE, WYDEN, MERKLEY ANNOUNCE ANOTHER $29 MILLION IN FEDERAL FUNDING FOR PORT OF COOS BAY INTERMODAL PROJECT

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Val Hoyle (OR-04)

    October 25, 2024

    New federal investment in South Coast comes on top of $25 million announced last week

    For Immediate Release: Oct. 25, 2024

    WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, U.S. Representative Val Hoyle, U.S. Senator Ron Wyden, and U.S. Senator Jeff Merkley, announced $29,751,615 in federal funding for the Pacific Coast Intermodal Port (PCIP) Coos Bay Rail Line (CBRL) Upgrades Planning Project. The investment comes from the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Consolidated Rail and Infrastructure Safety Improvements (CRISI) grant program.

    “Today’s award makes long overdue investments in the Coos Bay Rail Line and will improve sections of the line that have fallen into disrepair,” U.S. Representative Val Hoyle said. “Upgrades and repairs to rail line will help to move products across Oregon and the country faster. A renovated Coos Bay Rail Line is a key part of setting the Port of Coos Bay up to be the first ship-to-rail port on the west coast.” She went on to say, “I would like to thank Secretary Buttigieg, the U.S. Department of Transportation, the White House, and all members of the Oregon delegation for their continued support for bring this project one step closer to reality.”

    “Today’s great news for the Port of Coos Bay’s innovative ship-to-rail project keeps significant momentum rolling for this generational opportunity to spark thousands of good-paying jobs on the South Coast,” U.S. Senator Ron Wyden said. “On top of last week’s $25 million investment, today’s added $29 million for planning moves the port project and its huge economic and environmental benefits that much farther down the track to completion. I’m committed to continue the teamwork with Congresswoman Hoyle, Senator Merkley and the Biden-Harris administration to secure all the federal funds the Port of Coos Bay deserves for a successful result.”

    “The wins for Coos Bay’s transformative container port project keep rolling in! This additional $29.7 million award—bringing the total federal investment from the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law to $55 million—further moves the Port of Coos Bay toward the goal of becoming the first fully ship-to-rail port facility on the West Coast,” U.S. Senator Jeff Merkley said. “Specifically, the funding to upgrade the Coos Bay Rail Line is huge for the project because it ensures we have durable infrastructure in place that cuts climate-killing emissions and addresses bottlenecks in the national supply chain. I’ll keep working with the Oregon delegation to champion even more wins for this project that will create good-paying union and permanent local jobs on Oregon’s rural South Coast and boost the economy for our entire state.”

    Combined with a previous $25,018,750 Nationally Significant Multimodal Freight & Highway Projects (INFRA) grant award, that provides for engineering and design of the intermodal terminal component of the project, this award brings economic vitality back to the South Coast. With the potential to bring over 8,000 jobs back to the region, this project also makes good on the long-forgotten promise of creating new pathways to the middle class for South Coast residents.

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: IMF’s Sub-Saharan Africa Regional Economic Outlook: Reform Amid Great Expectations

    Source: IMF – News in Russian

    October 25, 2024

    • Growth in sub-Saharan Africa is projected at 3.6% in 2024, unchanged from 2023, with a modest increase to 4.2% in 2025 — insufficient to significantly reduce poverty or address development challenges.
    • Macroeconomic vulnerabilities persist and inflation remains high in many countries, while elevated public debt and rising debt service costs are crowding-out resources for development spending.
    • Policymakers face a tough balancing act in reducing vulnerabilities while addressing development needs and ensuring socially acceptable reforms amid tight financing constraints.

    Washington, DC: Sub-Saharan Africa’s economic growth is projected to remain subdued at 3.6 percent in 2024, unchanged from 2023, with a modest pickup to 4.2 percent expected in 2025, according to the latest IMF Regional Economic Outlook for Sub-Saharan Africa published today. The report notes that countries in the region are still grappling with macroeconomic imbalances, tight financing conditions, amid rising social pressures, leaving policymakers facing difficult choices in implementing reforms.

    “Sub-Saharan African countries are navigating a complex economic landscape marked by both progress and persistent vulnerabilities,” said Abebe Aemro Selassie, Director of the IMF’s African Department. “While many of the region’s countries are among the world’s fastest-growing economies, resource-intensive countries —particularly oil exporters— continue to struggle with lower growth rates. Inflation is declining but remains in double digits in nearly one-third of countries. Public debt has stabilized at a high level, with rising debt service burdens crowding out resources for development spending.”

    “While we are seeing some improvement in macroeconomic imbalances, growth remains insufficient to significantly reduce poverty or address substantial developmental challenges in the region.”

    The report includes focused notes addressing critical issues facing the region: the urgent need for job creation, the economic divergence between resource-rich and non-resource-rich countries, and the positive effects of striving for greater gender equality.

    Against this backdrop, Mr. Selassie pointed to priorities for policymakers in the region:

    “The policy mix should be consistent with the size of macroeconomic imbalances, while taking into account the political economy constraints that will affect the pace of reforms.

    “Countries with high macroeconomic imbalances are more likely to resort to relatively large and frontloaded fiscal reforms, given the tight financing constraints. The need for financial support from the international community is most acute for this group.

    “For countries with lower imbalances, policymakers should consider easing monetary policy toward a more neutral stance, while rebuilding fiscal and external buffers over time.”

    “Policymakers need to focus on designing reforms that are socially acceptable, including effective communication and consultation strategies and measures to protect the most vulnerable.

    “With continued efforts, sub-Saharan Africa can address its current challenges and move towards more sustainable and inclusive growth,” Mr. Selassie concluded. “However, the path ahead requires careful policy calibration and a strong commitment to implementing necessary reforms while managing social pressures.”

    IMF Communications Department
    MEDIA RELATIONS

    PRESS OFFICER: Kwabena Akuamoah-Boateng

    Phone: +1 202 623-7100Email: MEDIA@IMF.org

    @IMFSpokesperson

    https://www.imf.org/en/News/Articles/2024/10/25/pr-24395-ssa-imf-ssa-reo-reform-amid-great-expectations

    MIL OSI

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Global: Why Donald Trump’s accusations of election interference are a lose-lose situation for Keir Starmer

    Source: The Conversation – UK – By Christopher Featherstone, Associate Lecturer, Department of Politics, University of York

    With less than two weeks to go until the US presidential election, another surprise twist has emerged. Donald Trump has accused the “far-left” Labour party in the UK of election interference by sending volunteers to help the Kamala Harris campaign. This news must have come as a surprise to prime minister Keir Starmer.

    The core of the accusations made by Trump and his team is that Labour was offering financial support to volunteers and helping them arrange accommodation for their trips to the US – and that this amounted to “illegal foreign national contributions” to the Harris campaign.

    And at the centre of those accusations appears to be a now-deleted LinkedIn post from a Labour official saying she had “10 spots available” to campaign in North Carolina. Labour insists this did not mean any financial support was being offered. Labour figures have suggested the campaigning was being done by private citizens.

    Trump’s lawyers filed a complaint with the Federal Elections Commission (FEC) against both the Labour party and the Harris campaign on October 22 claiming otherwise. And the finance point is key, since – under the rules of the FEC – foreign volunteers can assist a campaign, but only if they are unpaid. 10 Downing Street insists the campaigners associated with Labour were not being paid.


    Want more politics coverage from academic experts? Every week, we bring you informed analysis of developments in government and fact check the claims being made.

    Sign up for our weekly politics newsletter, delivered every Friday.


    While there are important questions that need to be answered as to whether the Labour party did break US election rules, the questions about the implications of Trump’s accusations for US-UK relations are likely to be of even greater significance.

    Regardless of whether Trump’s accusations are sustained by the FEC, they are likely to frame his perception of the Starmer government should he win the presidency in less than two weeks’ time. Labour has made improving relations with politicians on both sides of the aisle in Washington a priority. These efforts appear to have been undermined overnight with Trump’s accusations.

    These accusations will likely be investigated after the election has been held. If Trump wins the presidency, he will have enormous influence over this investigation and the surrounding media coverage, which would be an unwelcome situation for Starmer to find himself in.

    Starmer visits Joe Biden at the White House in September 2024.
    Flickr/Number 10, CC BY-NC-ND

    Potentially even more serious is the fact that if Trump loses, this could be the story that he focuses on to explain why he lost. It may seem trivial but triviality has not stopped Trump before. The suggestion that Labour helped Harris could prove just as useful to Trump as the unfounded claims of widespread “voter fraud” in 2020 that helped him seed an insurrection on January 6.

    Whether the FEC finds that the role of Labour activists in the Harris campaign constitutes foreign interference or not, entanglement in this story is unlikely to help relations with either a Trump or a Harris White House.

    UK invovlement in US elections

    Foreign activists have long been involved in US election campaigning – and they do so on both sides.

    The current UK foreign secretary, David Lammy, campaigned for Barack Obama in 2012. In 2017, the Australian Labor party was fined by the FEC for paying for their volunteer’s flights to the US to campaign for Bernie Sanders in Democratic primaries.




    Read more:
    What US election interference law actually says about Labour volunteers


    Indeed, the Trump campaign has used foreign activists and campaigners in the past. Before he decided to run for the seat of Clacton-on-Sea in July 2024, Nigel Farage claimed that he was going to devote his time to campaigning for Trump. Farage has repeatedly been on stage with Trump at his rallies. Former UK prime minister Liz Truss also attended the Republican National Convention in 2024, supporting Trump and calling Joe Biden, then the Democratic Party’s nominee, “weak”.

    What is rare, however, is FEC scrutiny on all this campaigning. While the involvement of foreign volunteers is legal and normal in the US, the rules are rarely debated or tested by a legal probe. These accusations may initiate renewed attention to the issue, and potentially a change in these rules in future elections.

    Importantly, while the coverage of Trump’s accusations against Labour and the Harris campaign have received huge coverage in the UK, attention in the US is limited. Much of the US media coverage has focused on allegations from John Kelly against Trump. Kelly, Trump’s former chief of staff, has accused Trump of being a fascist and of having said that he wished he had generals like “Hitler’s generals”. Trump’s claims about the UK have therefore received far less attention in the US than might have been anticipated. This will have diminished the impact of Trump’s claims with US voters, good news for the future. But Starmer should still be concerned about the impact on diplomatic relations.

    As with many of Donald Trump’s accusations and more controversial comments, there are a lot of moving parts. Trump showed how important his own personal attitudes were in US diplomacy during his previous administration. He is unlikely to forget about these accusations anytime soon, whether he wins or loses.

    Christopher Featherstone does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Why Donald Trump’s accusations of election interference are a lose-lose situation for Keir Starmer – https://theconversation.com/why-donald-trumps-accusations-of-election-interference-are-a-lose-lose-situation-for-keir-starmer-242063

    MIL OSI – Global Reports