NewzIntel.com

    • Checkout Page
    • Contact Us
    • Default Redirect Page
    • Frontpage
    • Home-2
    • Home-3
    • Lost Password
    • Member Login
    • Member LogOut
    • Member TOS Page
    • My Account
    • NewzIntel Alert Control-Panel
    • NewzIntel Latest Reports
    • Post Views Counter
    • Privacy Policy
    • Public Individual Page
    • Register
    • Subscription Plan
    • Thank You Page

Category: Economy

  • MIL-OSI: Ninepoint Partners Announces Estimated January 2025 Cash Distributions for Ninepoint Cash Management Fund – ETF Series

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    TORONTO, Jan. 24, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Ninepoint Partners LP (“Ninepoint Partners”) today announced the estimated January 2025 cash distribution for the ETF Series of Ninepoint Cash Management Fund (the “Fund”). Ninepoint Partners expects to issue a press release on or about January 30, 2025, which will provide the final distribution rate. The record date for the cash distribution is January 31, 2025, payable on February 7, 2025.

    All estimates in this document are based on the accounting data as of January 24, 2025. Due to subscriptions and/or redemptions and/or other factors, the final January 2025 distribution may differ from these estimates and the difference could be material. The information included in this letter is for reference purposes only. Please reconcile all information against your official client statements. This is not intended to be a statement for official tax reporting purposes or any form of tax advice.

    The actual taxable amounts of distributions for 2025, including the tax characteristics of the distributions, will be reported to CDS Clearing and Depository Services Inc. in early 2026. Securityholders can contact their brokerage firm for this information.

    The per-unit estimated January distribution is detailed below:

    Ninepoint ETF Series Ticker Cash Distribution per
    unit
    Notional Distribution
    per unit
    CUSIP
    Ninepoint Cash Management Fund NSAV $0.13608 $0.00000 65443X105
             

    About Ninepoint Partners

    Based in Toronto, Ninepoint Partners LP is one of Canada’s leading alternative investment management firms overseeing approximately $7 billion in assets under management and institutional contracts. Committed to helping investors explore innovative investment solutions that have the potential to enhance returns and manage portfolio risk, Ninepoint offers a diverse set of alternative strategies spanning Equities, Fixed Income, Alternative Income, Real Assets, F/X and Digital Assets.

    For more information on Ninepoint Partners LP, please visit http://www.ninepoint.com or for inquiries regarding the offering, please contact us at (416) 943-6707 or (866) 299-9906 or invest@ninepoint.com.

    Ninepoint Partners LP is the investment manager to the Ninepoint Funds (collectively, the “Funds”). Commissions, trailing commissions, management fees, performance fees (if any), and other expenses all may be associated with investing in the Funds. Please read the prospectus carefully before investing. The information contained herein does not constitute an offer or solicitation by anyone in the United States or in any other jurisdiction in which such an offer or solicitation is not authorized or to any person to whom it is unlawful to make such an offer or solicitation. Prospective investors who are not residents in Canada should contact their financial advisor to determine whether securities of the Fund may be lawfully sold in their jurisdiction.

    Please note that distribution factors (breakdown between income, capital gains and return of capital) can only be calculated when a fund has reached its year-end. Distribution information should not be relied upon for income tax reporting purposes as this is only a component of total distributions for the year. For accurate distribution amounts for the purpose of filing an income tax return, please refer to the appropriate T3/T5 slips for that particular taxation year. Please refer to the prospectus or offering memorandum of each Fund for details of the Fund’s distribution policy.

    The payment of distributions and distribution breakdown, if applicable, is not guaranteed and may fluctuate. The payment of distributions should not be confused with a Fund’s performance, rate of return, or yield. If distributions paid by the Fund are greater than the performance of the Fund, then an investor’s original investment will shrink. Distributions paid as a result of capital gains realized by a Fund and income and dividends earned by a Fund are taxable in the year they are paid. An investor’s adjusted cost base will be reduced by the amount of any returns of capital. If an investor’s adjusted cost base goes below zero, then capital gains tax will have to be paid on the amount below zero.

    Sales Inquiries:

    Ninepoint Partners LP
    Neil Ross
    416-945-6227
    nross@ninepoint.com

    The MIL Network –

    January 25, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: CNBC: Democratic lawmakers ask regulators to look into Donald and Melania Trump meme coins

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Massachusetts – Elizabeth Warren

    January 23, 2025

    Two senior congressional Democrats have asked multiple regulators to look into the propriety of meme coins issued by President Donald Trump and first lady Melania Trump.

    Sen. Elizabeth Warren and Rep. Jake Auchincloss, both of Massachusetts, raised issues regarding the first couple using their respective offices for enrichment, along with the potential for “rug-pull” scams similar to what has happened with the other such tokens, as well as possible conflicts of interest.

    “We write with deep concern about the decision by President Trump and First Lady Melania Trump to launch two meme coins, $TRUMP and $MELANIA, that allow them to earn extraordinary profits off his Presidency,” the pair said in a letter obtained by CNBC.com.

    “These coins do not create new faster, cheaper, and safer payments rails. These coins do not help people borrow more affordably. They do not improve the financial system in any way for consumers,” they added.

    The digital tokens have already generated billions of dollars on paper for the Trump family.

    …

    Read the full article here.

    By:  Jeff Cox, Mackenzie Sigalos
    Source: CNBC



    Previous Article

    MIL OSI USA News –

    January 25, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: CBS News: Big banks hiked interest rates on borrowers but not for savers, senators say

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Massachusetts – Elizabeth Warren

    January 23, 2025

    As interest rates climbed, major banks charged borrowers more for mortgages and auto loans, yet never increased payouts to savers, despite telling lawmakers they would do so, say two U.S. senators in letters to seven CEOs, shared exclusively with CBS News.

    In March 2022, the Federal Reserve started raising the federal funds rate, with banks following suit by hiking rates for mortgages, auto loans and credit cards. But those increases were not matched with high interest rate payouts on savings accounts at banks including Bank of America, Citibank, JPMorgan Chase, PNC Bank, Truist, U.S. Bank and Wells Fargo, according to the lawmakers.

    “This tactic — charging borrowers more, paying savers a little, and pocketing interest paid by the Federal Reserve — has enabled U.S. banks to rake in record profits of $1 trillion and JPMorgan alone to make record profits of $49.6 billion in 2023,” according to Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-Massachusetts) and Jack Reed (D-Rhode Island), the authors of the letters. Meanwhile, “savers have struggled to keep up with inflation,” they added.

    JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon and his counterparts at half a dozen other financial institutions testified before the Senate Banking Committee in September of 2022 that their respective banks expected to increase rates for savers, albeit at a slower pace. While interest rates on the accounts JPMorgan keeps at the Fed rose from 3.15% to 4.65%, JPMorgan’s customers continue to earn .01% on their savings, the lawmakers stated. 

    …

    Read the full article here.

    By:  Kate Gibson
    Source: CBS News



    MIL OSI USA News –

    January 25, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: $HAREHOLDER ALERT: The M&A Class Action Firm Urges Stockholders of NARI, DFS, LBRDA, CCRN to Act Now

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    NEW YORK, Jan. 24, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) —

    Monteverde & Associates PC (the “M&A Class Action Firm”), has recovered millions of dollars for shareholders and is recognized as a Top 50 Firm by ISS Securities Class Action Services Report. We are headquartered at the Empire State Building in New York City and are investigating:

    • Inari Medical, Inc. (Nasdaq: NARI), relating to the proposed merger with Stryker. Under the terms of the agreement, Stryker will acquire all of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of Inari Medical for $80 per share in cash.

    ACT NOW. The Tender Offer expires on February 18, 2025.

    Click here for more https://monteverdelaw.com/case/inari-medical-inc-nari/. It is free and there is no cost or obligation to you.

    • Discover Financial Services (NYSE: DFS), relating to its proposed merger with Capital One Financial Corp. Under the terms of the agreement, DFS shareholders are expected to receive 1.0192 shares of Capital One per share they own.

    ACT NOW. The Shareholder Vote is scheduled for February 18, 2025.

    Click here for more information: https://www.monteverdelaw.com/case/discover-financial-services. It is free and there is no cost or obligation to you.

    • Liberty Broadband Corporation (NASDAQ: LBRDA, LBRDK, LBRDP), relating to the proposed merger with Charter Communications, Inc. Under the terms of the agreement, Liberty Broadband common stockholders will receive 0.236 of a share of Charter common stock per share of Liberty Broadband common stock they own.

    ACT NOW. The Shareholder Vote is scheduled for February 26, 2025.

    Click here for more information https://monteverdelaw.com/case/liberty-broadband-corporation-lbrda-lbrdk-lbrdp/. It is free and there is no cost or obligation to you.

    • Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. (NASDAQ: CCRN), relating to the proposed merger with Aya Healthcare. Under the terms of the agreement, shares of Cross Country will be converted into the right to receive $18.61 in cash.

    ACT NOW. The Shareholder Vote is scheduled for February 28, 2025.

    Click here for more https://monteverdelaw.com/case/cross-country-healthcare-inc-ccrn/. It is free and there is no cost or obligation to you.

    NOT ALL LAW FIRMS ARE THE SAME. Before you hire a law firm, you should talk to a lawyer and ask:

    1. Do you file class actions and go to Court?
    2. When was the last time you recovered money for shareholders?
    3. What cases did you recover money in and how much?

    About Monteverde & Associates PC

    Our firm litigates and has recovered money for shareholders…and we do it from our offices in the Empire State Building. We are a national class action securities firm with a successful track record in trial and appellate courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court. 

    No company, director or officer is above the law. If you own common stock in any of the above listed companies and have concerns or wish to obtain additional information free of charge, please visit our website or contact Juan Monteverde, Esq. either via e-mail at jmonteverde@monteverdelaw.com or by telephone at (212) 971-1341.

    Contact:
    Juan Monteverde, Esq.
    MONTEVERDE & ASSOCIATES PC
    The Empire State Building
    350 Fifth Ave. Suite 4740
    New York, NY 10118
    United States of America
    jmonteverde@monteverdelaw.com
    Tel: (212) 971-1341

    Attorney Advertising. (C) 2024 Monteverde & Associates PC. The law firm responsible for this advertisement is Monteverde & Associates PC (http://www.monteverdelaw.com).  Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome with respect to any future matter.

    The MIL Network –

    January 25, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: $HAREHOLDER ALERT: The M&A Class Action Firm Urges Stockholders of NARI, DFS, LBRDA, CCRN to Act Now

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    NEW YORK, Jan. 24, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) —

    Monteverde & Associates PC (the “M&A Class Action Firm”), has recovered millions of dollars for shareholders and is recognized as a Top 50 Firm by ISS Securities Class Action Services Report. We are headquartered at the Empire State Building in New York City and are investigating:

    • Inari Medical, Inc. (Nasdaq: NARI), relating to the proposed merger with Stryker. Under the terms of the agreement, Stryker will acquire all of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of Inari Medical for $80 per share in cash.

    ACT NOW. The Tender Offer expires on February 18, 2025.

    Click here for more https://monteverdelaw.com/case/inari-medical-inc-nari/. It is free and there is no cost or obligation to you.

    • Discover Financial Services (NYSE: DFS), relating to its proposed merger with Capital One Financial Corp. Under the terms of the agreement, DFS shareholders are expected to receive 1.0192 shares of Capital One per share they own.

    ACT NOW. The Shareholder Vote is scheduled for February 18, 2025.

    Click here for more information: https://www.monteverdelaw.com/case/discover-financial-services. It is free and there is no cost or obligation to you.

    • Liberty Broadband Corporation (NASDAQ: LBRDA, LBRDK, LBRDP), relating to the proposed merger with Charter Communications, Inc. Under the terms of the agreement, Liberty Broadband common stockholders will receive 0.236 of a share of Charter common stock per share of Liberty Broadband common stock they own.

    ACT NOW. The Shareholder Vote is scheduled for February 26, 2025.

    Click here for more information https://monteverdelaw.com/case/liberty-broadband-corporation-lbrda-lbrdk-lbrdp/. It is free and there is no cost or obligation to you.

    • Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. (NASDAQ: CCRN), relating to the proposed merger with Aya Healthcare. Under the terms of the agreement, shares of Cross Country will be converted into the right to receive $18.61 in cash.

    ACT NOW. The Shareholder Vote is scheduled for February 28, 2025.

    Click here for more https://monteverdelaw.com/case/cross-country-healthcare-inc-ccrn/. It is free and there is no cost or obligation to you.

    NOT ALL LAW FIRMS ARE THE SAME. Before you hire a law firm, you should talk to a lawyer and ask:

    1. Do you file class actions and go to Court?
    2. When was the last time you recovered money for shareholders?
    3. What cases did you recover money in and how much?

    About Monteverde & Associates PC

    Our firm litigates and has recovered money for shareholders…and we do it from our offices in the Empire State Building. We are a national class action securities firm with a successful track record in trial and appellate courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court. 

    No company, director or officer is above the law. If you own common stock in any of the above listed companies and have concerns or wish to obtain additional information free of charge, please visit our website or contact Juan Monteverde, Esq. either via e-mail at jmonteverde@monteverdelaw.com or by telephone at (212) 971-1341.

    Contact:
    Juan Monteverde, Esq.
    MONTEVERDE & ASSOCIATES PC
    The Empire State Building
    350 Fifth Ave. Suite 4740
    New York, NY 10118
    United States of America
    jmonteverde@monteverdelaw.com
    Tel: (212) 971-1341

    Attorney Advertising. (C) 2024 Monteverde & Associates PC. The law firm responsible for this advertisement is Monteverde & Associates PC (http://www.monteverdelaw.com).  Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome with respect to any future matter.

    The MIL Network –

    January 25, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Global: Amid LA fires, neighbors helped each other survive – 60 years of research shows how local heroes are crucial to disaster response

    Source: The Conversation – USA – By Tricia Wachtendorf, Professor of Sociology and Director, Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware

    Neighbors fill and pass a bucket of pool water to help extinguish a spot fire in Pacific Palisades, Calif., on Jan. 9, 2025. Brian van der Brug / Los Angeles Times via Getty Image

    As wildfires swept through neighborhoods on the outskirts of Los Angeles in January 2025, stories about residents there helping their neighbors and total strangers began trickling out on social media.

    Accounts of Hollywood stars clearing streets for emergency vehicles to get through and raising money for fire victims were widely circulated. But there were many other examples of less-famous people helping older neighbors to safety, and even showing up with trailers to evacuate horses.

    Businesses, including fitness centers, opened their facilities so evacuees could shower or charge their phones. Organizations that routinely work with homeless populations quickly mobilized their members to help ensure people living on the streets and in camps could get to secure, safe locations away from the fires and hazardous air quality.

    Disasters, by definition, overwhelm local resources, making civilian responders like these essential. Sixty years of research at the University of Delaware’s Disaster Research Center and by others examining the social aspects of disaster has repeatedly shown effective disaster management requires mobilizing community resources far beyond official channels.

    Often the response happens through local groups that form in response to a clear need in the community and with shared skills and interests. And this is exactly what we are witnessing in Los Angeles.

    Civilians helping often number in the thousands

    The number of those who step up to help during disasters varies by event, but it can be tremendous.

    Following the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing, over 6,800 volunteers worked with the Red Cross on the response. That same year, volunteers responding to the Kobe earthquake in Japan logged more than 1 million person-days of activity, a measure of the number of people times the hours they contributed.

    People use garden hoses to try to prevent homes from catching fire in Altadena, Calif., on Jan. 8, 2025. Neighbors rushed to help neighbors as the wind blew burning embers into neighborhoods.
    Mario Tama/Getty Images

    In an in-depth study of the Sept. 11, 2001, World Trade Center attacks, we interviewed local residents who used their retired fireboat to pump water for the firefighters at ground zero. Operators of tug, ferry and tour boats in and around New York City immediately responded to quickly evacuate 500,000 people in the area from danger. In fact, the majority of the boats involved belonged to private companies. Other volunteers queued evacuees and organized supplies and rides to get people home.

    Over 900 people, most acting in unofficial capacities, were awarded medals or ribbons for their efforts in just the marine response after the World Trade Center attack.

    A survey of residents after the 1985 Mexico City earthquake found that nearly 10% of local residents volunteered in the first three weeks of the response. Following the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake, in California, a survey of residents in Santa Cruz and San Francisco counties found that two-thirds of the public were involved in response activities.

    Local businesses are often quick to help in disasters. Greg Dulan, center, who runs a soul food restaurant and food truck, hands out hot meals to wildfire evacuees at a church in Pasadena, Calif., on Jan. 15, 2025.
    Jason Armond/Los Angeles Times via Getty Images

    However, much of the work local residents contribute during and after disasters goes unaccounted for in official reports.

    There is no mechanism to quantify the full extent to which a neighbor or a complete stranger helps someone flee from peril. Yet when people are trapped and minutes count, research shows it is family, friends and neighbors who are already on the scene and are most likely to save lives. It’s often everyday citizens who also take on immediate tasks such as debris removal. Providing a phone, a car, a place to do laundry, or a little bit of elbow grease can fill a gap and let firefighters and other formal responders focus on critical operations.

    Getting the right help to where it’s needed

    Every study of a large-scale disaster conducted by the Disaster Research Center has revealed some level of emergent, informal helping behavior.

    The lack of public understanding about the large number of local residents already involved, often including disaster victims themselves, can lead to an influx of outsiders eager to help. Their arrival can actually pose challenges for the disaster response.

    When too many people show up, or when people try to operate outside their areas of expertise, they can put themselves and others at further risk. Communities often need supplies, but unsolicited goods of the wrong kind or at the wrong time can create more problems than they solve.

    Local groups such as the Pasadena Community Job Center organize volunteers to send them where help is requested. This group is removing debris from streets in Pasadena, Calif., in the wake of the Eaton Fire on Jan. 14, 2025.
    Zoë Meyers/AFP via Getty Images

    So, what can you do to best support these local efforts?

    Making a financial contribution to a trusted disaster response or local organization can go a long way to providing the support communities actually need. Organizations such as the American Red Cross or Feeding America, or local community-based groups that routinely work in the area, are often best suited to help where it’s needed the most.

    Skilled help will be needed for the long term

    Also, remember that disasters don’t end when the emergency is over. Survivors of the Los Angeles-area fires face years of confusing and frustrating recovery tasks ahead.

    Offering help after the immediate threat has passed – particularly skilled help, such as experience in construction or expertise in managing insurance and FEMA paperwork – is just as important.

    For example, after fires in 1970 destroyed hundreds of homes in the San Diego area, local architects, engineers and contractors donated their time and skills to help people rebuild. Their work was coordinated by a local architect and member of the Chamber of Commerce to ensure projects were assigned to reputable volunteers.

    As we recognize the important ways that neighbors and strangers helped those around them, the broader community can support wildfire victims by responding to offering the right help as recovery needs emerge. Just about every skill that is useful in calm times will be needed in these difficult months and years ahead.

    Tricia Wachtendorf receives funding from the National Science Foundation and Arnold Ventures Foundation.

    James Kendra receives funding from the National Science Foundation and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

    – ref. Amid LA fires, neighbors helped each other survive – 60 years of research shows how local heroes are crucial to disaster response – https://theconversation.com/amid-la-fires-neighbors-helped-each-other-survive-60-years-of-research-shows-how-local-heroes-are-crucial-to-disaster-response-247660

    MIL OSI – Global Reports –

    January 25, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Sens Marshall, Welch, McCormick, Fetterman and Reps. Thompson, and Schrier Lead Bipartisan Legislation to Bring Whole Milk Access To All Schools

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Kansas Roger Marshall

    Washington, D.C. – U.S. Senators Roger Marshall, M.D., Peter Welch (D-VT), Dave McCormick (R-PA), and John Fetterman (D-PA), as well as U.S. Representatives G.T. Thompson (R-PA) and Kim Schrier (D-WA) introduced bipartisan legislation that amends the Richard Russell National School Lunch Act to allow schools participating in the program to serve whole and reduced milk as part of the National School Lunch Program. 
    The Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGA) reports that nearly 90% of Americans do not meet their daily dairy intake recommendations, and includes Calcium and Vitamin D as nutrients of public health concern, which milk is an excellent source of. This legislation expands healthy milk options in schools to improve our students’ nutrition intake and will be a critical step in improving child nutrition health outcomes.
    “Whole and reduced fat milk should never have been excluded from the National School Lunch Program. Now, 13 years after its removal, nearly 75% of children do not receive their recommended daily dairy intake. I believe in a healthier future for America, and by increasing kids’ access to milk in school cafeterias, we will help prevent diet- related diseases down the road, as well as encourage nutrient-rich diets for years to come. Whole milk is an excellent source of 13 essential nutrients for students and adults alike in building strong bones. Plus, it tastes good,” said Senator Marshall.
    “Milk provides growing kids with key nutrients they need. Dairy is also an important part of Vermont’s culture and local economy, which is why our bipartisan bill to expand access to whole milk in our schools is a win for Vermont’s students and farmers. This bill helps provide our next generation grow stronger and helps dairy farmers do what they love–feed our communities,” said Senator Welch. “I’m proud to partner with Senator Marshall and Representative Thompson on this legislation, which will allow our schools to provide students with the healthy, high-quality, and locally-produced whole milk Vermont’s dairy farms have produced for generations.”
    “The Whole Milk for Healthy Kids Act puts milk back in schools that our growing kids actually want to drink,” said Senator McCormick. “Pennsylvania’s dairy farmers supply this country with an abundant source of milk year-round. Allowing schools to serve whole milk and reduced-fat milk, in addition to low-fat and fat-free milk, in the lunchroom is just commonsense. I’m proud to support our dairy farmers and our students by supplying them with the essential nutrients found in milk to learn and grow.”
    “Kids need wholesome, nourishing food to grow strong and stay healthy, and whole milk is packed with the nutrients they need. Let’s give them the option to enjoy it again in schools—it’s good for them, they’ll actually drink it, and it supports our farmers. This bill is a simple solution that benefits everyone,” said Senator Fetterman.
    “Federal policy, based on flawed, outdated science has kept whole milk out of school cafeterias for more than a decade,” said Rep. Thompson. “Milk provides 13 essential nutrients that supplement growth and health, two key factors contributing to academic success. The Whole Milk for Healthy Kids Act of 2025 provides schools the flexibility they need to offer a variety of options, while supporting students and America’s hard-working dairy farmers.”  
    “As a pediatrician, I know how important a balanced and nutritious diet is for children’s health, well-being, and development,” said Congresswoman Schrier. “A healthy diet early in life leads to proper physical growth and improved academic performance, and can set the foundation for lifelong healthy eating habits. Milk is a significant part of many children’s diets and contains essential nutrients such as calcium and vitamin D. This bill simply gives schools the option of providing the types of milk most kids prefer to drink. ”
    “IDFA thanks Reps. G.T. Thompson (R-PA-15) and Kim Schrier (D-WA-8), Senators Roger Marshall (R-KS), Peter Welch (D-VT), John Fetterman (D-PA) and David McCormick (R-PA) and scores of other co-sponsors for their bipartisan, bicameral introduction of the Whole Milk for Healthy Kids Act, which would allow schools to provide the nutritious milk options that children prefer. Whole milk provides them with milk’s 13 essential nutrients for growth, development, healthy immune function, and overall wellness. A wide majority of parents and medical and nutrition professionals know that offering whole milk increases school meal participation, reduces food waste, and provides nutritionally valuable school meals for children and adolescents.” Michael Dykes, CEO of the International Dairy Foods Association said. 
    “NMPF commends Reps. Thompson and Schrier, and Senators Marshall, Welch, McCormick, and Fetterman for their leadership in boosting students’ access to crucial nutrition with their Whole Milk for Healthy Kids Act. Just last month, the Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee reaffirmed that most Americans under-consume nutrient-dense dairy.  This much-needed bill lets schools offer students the healthful milk options that they are most likely to drink by permitting the serving of nutritious reduced fat and whole milk varieties, critically addressing kids’ under-consumption of milk’s essential nutrients. NMPF is ready to work with the bill’s bipartisan sponsors to move this commonsense, widely supported solution across the finish line this year,” said Gregg Doud, President and CEO, National Milk Producers Federation
    Background: 
    In 2010, Congress passed the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act which amended nutrition standards in the School Lunch Program. Among the changes, the law mandated that flavored milk must be fat-free within the program.
    In May of 2017, the USDA announced a rule that allowed schools to receive waivers for low-fat (1%) flavored milk, rather than only fat-free.
    Last Congress, the Whole MIlk for Healthy Kids Act passed the House of Representatives with overwhelming bipartisan support (330-99). 
    Leading nutritionists have found that whole dairy fats have no negative effect on a diet, and may even reduce risk of heart disease.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    January 25, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Commissioner Kristin Johnson’s Keynote Address at the University of Chicago Law School: Charting the Future of Financial Regulation

    Source: US Commodity Futures Trading Commission

    Good afternoon. Thank you to Dean Miles, Professor Birdthistle and the broader University of Chicago Law School for the kind invitation to join you for today’s event. We can often learn a great deal about the future by looking at the past. About 4,000 years ago (c. 2000 B.C.E.), Phoenician sailors developed charts and observations of the Sun and stars. Early mariners’ compasses were inaccurate or inconsistent because they lacked an understanding of magnetic variation. Later, the astrolabe, sextant, chip log, gyroscopic compass, radar, and GPS replaced earlier, primitive tools.
    In remarks earlier this week at a blockchain event at the World Economic Forum in Davos, I explored rapidly advancing technologies—an area that has long been a central focus of my contributions as a lawyer in private practice, in-house counsel, an academic, and most recently, a financial market regulator at the CFTC.[1] Today, on the eve of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s (CFTC) 50th Anniversary, we stand, once again on the frontier—a frontier of technological development in markets—including increasingly advanced computing, predictive analytical models, and algorithmic trading, and digital trading, clearing and settlement.
    During the most recent past administration, the Securities Exchange Commission Divisions of Trading and Markets and of Investment Management announced rule amendments to shorten the standard settlement cycle for most broker-dealer transactions from two business days after the trade date (“T+2”) to one business day after the trade date (“T+1”)[2] marking faster, more efficient, less costly trading ushered in, in part, by digitization of trading market infrastructure. Many of our largest market participants have partnered with technology firms to migrate exceptional volumes of data including orders, quotes, trades, cancellations and settlement data to cloud-based storage.
    Executive Orders this week on AI and digital assets or cryptocurrency indicate the new administration’s intent to focus on these new technologies. As we prepare to hear from the new administration regarding solutions to address the intricacies of balancing responsible innovation with the critical goals of ensuring market integrity, market stability, and protection of vulnerable market participants, let’s keep top-of-mind the lessons of the past and the benefits of well-honed regulatory tools which aid us in navigating the sea of technological innovation set forth before us.
    Today, we will consider the two specific technologies at the center of the new administration’s Executive Orders issued yesterday—AI and crypto.
    Artificial Intelligence in Financial Markets
    Financial markets regulation is often defined by two salient questions—what should we regulate and, if we regulate, what should be the scope of regulation. Knowing that crypto technologies are a focus of my remarks, some of you might demand that we tailor these questions and simply focus on the legal standard for distinguishing among regulated products, namely securities and commodities, citing the debate surrounding the legal standard articulated by the Supreme Court of the United States in SCOTUS’s now (in)famous 1946 decision S.E.C. vs Howey,[3] explaining that investment contracts that involve an investment of money in a common enterprise with an expectation of profits to be derived from the efforts of others.
    Leaving this question aside for a moment and focusing on the macro issue, I would note an underlying premise of these two fundamental questions. It is presumed that regulators understand both the products and the markets that are the subject of regulation—that we are clear on the benefits as well as the risks and limitations posed by products, processes, and market structures introduced in our markets. In other words, we are well-informed and deeply engaged in discussions regarding the attributes of what we regulate. I would also share that, for me, this understanding informs “how” I think about regulation.
    The Ever-Expanding Universe of AI Use Cases
    AI has long served financial services firms. For decades, firms have integrated standard algorithms and earlier forms of machine learning in both external client-facing applications as well as internal operations.[4] Developers tout the potential for more nascent uses of AI to enhance critical risk management tools, “inform[ing] trading strategies by identifying patterns, optimizing execution, managing portfolio workflows, and assessing risk-return tradeoffs.”[5] According to proponents, deep learning through neural networks holds promise to simulate the multi-layered, complex decision-making capabilities of the human brain.
    Several years ago, the CFTC identified a number of AI use cases in our regulated markets:

    Trading (including market intelligence, robo-advisory, sentiment analysis, algorithmic trading, smart routing, and transactions)
    Risk Management (including margin and capital requirements, trade monitoring, fraud detection)
    Risk Assessments and Hedging
    Resource Optimization (including energy and computer power)
    RegTech – Applications that enhance or improve compliance and oversight activities (including surveillance, reporting)
    Compliance (including identity and customer validation, anti-money laundering, regulatory reporting)
    Books and Records (including automated trade histories from voice or text)
    Data Processing and Analytics
    Cybersecurity and Resilience
    Customer Service.[6]

    The ever-expanding universe of AI use cases impacts investment, trading, surveillance and compliance, fraud detection, cyber security and supervision and enforcement across the derivatives and broader financial markets. In discussing AI’s application across financial markets, a Treasury report released last month stated “some financial firms have been experimenting with Generative AI tools—to explore the capabilities of AI in enhancing existing processes.”[7]
    “Robo-advisors offer personalized investment advisory services, while AI-driven insights improve forecasting and trading process automation.”[8] The Treasury Department’s recent report on Artificial Intelligence in Financial Services also notes that “financial firms are increasingly using AI—and particularly experimenting with Generative AI—internal business operations, including but not limited to risk management, regulatory compliance, treasury management, fraud detection, and back-office functions.”[9]
    Risks and Challenges Remain
    Attendant risks associated with the increase in use of AI, however, deserves equal attention, particularly for regulators tasked with safeguarding the integrity and stability of financial markets and the global economy. In testimony before Congress and academic work prior to my service at the Commission, I have encouraged regulators and market participants to also consider the following risks fraud and market manipulation, bias and discrimination, and privacy and data protection risks.[10]
    As the Financial Stability Board recently explained, “many of the potential risks of AI may seem new, but when you look beneath the surface, they are strikingly similar to traditional financial risks. Risks that we are familiar with. We already have frameworks to assess concentration risk, third party dependence and interconnectedness. This is good news. But potential new forms of interconnectedness in the financial system may emerge.”[11]
    To that end, it will be imperative for regulators to understand, track, and be poised to address emerging cybersecurity, third-party, concentration, and human capital risks.

    Cybersecurity

    Few would disagree that cybersecurity attacks and related disruptions pose one of the most pernicious and persistent threats to global financial markets.  In a timely and critical report on cybersecurity and AI, Treasury notes that “complex and persistent cyber threats continue to grow, and some experts from financial institutions believe the availability of advanced AI tools such as Generative AI will, at least initially, give threat actors an upper hand.”[12] Following a recent attack that disrupted clearing and settlement in derivatives markets in January of 2023, the Commission adopted a proposed rule enhancing operational resilience for swap dealers. In parallel to this rule, the Market Risk Advisory Committee that I sponsor, encouraged the Commission to consider comprehensive reform and consider the need for parallel reforms for our derivatives clearing organizations. While our principles-based approach to regulation enables dynamic application of existing rules, we must be ever vigilant to ensure that regulation is keeping pace and fit-for-purpose. I am looking forward to advancing these initiatives.

    Third-Party Risk Management

    Financial market regulators have, for several years, noted the challenges of relying on third parties for critical services. While regulated entities may have robust tools to monitor their own activities, our market participants increasingly partner with and rely upon third parties for critical services. Third party critical service providers may not have the comprehensive compliance processes and procedures the regulated entities have. The cascading impact of disruption may impact the many financial institutions that rely on the same critical third-party service providers, potentially engendering systemic risk concerns.[13]

    Concentration Risk

    The increasing reliance on third party service providers and the limited number of critical third-party service providers creates concentration risk. While the largest financial services firms in the world may have less exposure to these threats, smaller and medium sized firms without the technical expertise to develop high-cost technologies may need to rely on third parties and may also adapt these technologies in ways not anticipated by original developers, creating additional frictions.
    At the CFTC, we have been engaged in a longstanding dialogue with our market participants and our colleagues at other federal regulatory agencies to analyze and work to address these concerns—and we plan to continue the conversation.
    Last year, our staff released a request for comment, soliciting data regarding our market participants’ increasing use of AI.[14] We have not been alone in this work. The U.S. Department of Treasury similarly issued a request for information.[15] I worked with staff at the CFTC and staff at Treasury prior to and following these RFIs. The important results of these forms of engagement have only scratched the surface, given that “[o]ne of the most significant learnings from the comment responses is the reported ubiquity of AI usage—in particular traditional AI such as algorithms or machine learning—in virtually every function of financial firms, ranging from compliance management, internal operations, underwriting, customer service, treasury management, and product development and marketing.”[16]
    A Roadmap for the Future
    I have advanced, and will continue to advance, several policy initiatives over the course of my time at the Commission.
    Collaboration is Key

    Continued Dialogue

    There is still much work to be done. Continuing conversations with interested stakeholders across the board is the only way to ensure that we are learning in real time and incorporating that knowledge into sensible actions, both within the regulatory sphere and in the private sector.
    This dialogue “create[s] a framework that simultaneously serves two goals. The first is protecting the integrity of the trading markets so that they fairly serve the interests of participants and the larger public. The second is welcoming and encouraging the development and application of the newest technologies with responsible guardrails. In this way, we can ensure that these technologies help assure that the United States financial markets remain leaders in financial innovation in the years ahead.”[17]

    Interagency coordination

    In the December Treasury report, a brief discussion of the existing and proposed frameworks related to the use of AI in financial services is more than two pages long.[18] And that is just the first layer before adding state laws on AI, which can differ from each other and from federal frameworks, and finally, international standards.
    Of course, each regulator has its own specific mission and mandate. However, regulators must work together to harmonize regulation.[19]
    The Financial Stability Oversight Council echoes this recommendation in its annual report: “The Council supports interagency development of expertise to analyze and monitor potential systemic risks associated with the use of AI in the financial services sector, as well as further inter-agency discussions on developments in AI and associated financial stability risks.”[20]
    FSOC also recognizes the need for collaboration on a global scale. “The U.S. financial system is part of a global network and could potentially be vulnerable to shocks that originate abroad. The Council supports continued engagement with international counterparts on the risks and benefits of AI in financial services.”[21]
    Enhanced Resources for An Enhanced Mission

    Resources Must Keep Pace with Demand

    The CFTC is small but mighty, and continues to punch above its weight on all matters that come before it. In 2015 amidst the Dodd-Frank regulatory mandates, the CFTC had completed a greater percentage of its Dodd-Frank rules than other domestic financial regulatory agencies despite its smaller staff.[22] The same has been true in the past few years, as the Commission has taken on an increased role in addressing digital assets, while continuing its existing work, without any increase in budget.
    As the CFTC oversees increasingly complex markets, and must identify threats from increasingly sophisticated bad actors, it must have the resources to continue to do so effectively. I feel it important to reiterate that “the Commission would benefit from increased resources dedicated to enabling several of the Divisions within the Commission to prepare for and meet the challenges of regulating innovative trading, clearing, and settlement technologies, among other changes to operational infrastructure that merits consideration.”[23]

    An AI Fraud Task Force to Tackle Fraud Full Force

    I have expressly called for the CFTC Division of Enforcement to create an AI Fraud Task Force. While there may be divergent opinions on the benefits and risks engendered by AI, preventing bad actors from using AI to commit fraud against consumers and potentially market participants should be common ground. “Policing derivatives markets is one of the cornerstones of the CFTC’s mission. We must adapt our surveillance technologies and enforcement penalties to keep pace with the rapidly evolving innovation that characterizes global financial markets.”[24]
    A Future Framework for Digital Asset Markets 
    A second Executive Order released yesterday established a Presidential Working Group on Digital Asset Markets within the National Economic Council and appointed a Special Advisor for AI and Crypto to serve as Chairman of the PWG.
    Meaningful regulation in any market begins with identifying and developing standards to address certain risk management concerns. Many of the risks in the digital asset markets are well known.Learning from the lessons of the past few years, I am hopeful that any action to establish digital asset regulation include needed clarity regarding the application of rules and protections that safeguard the integrity of our markets. These regulations often also serve the organizations that implement them well.
    Digital asset market regulation should incorporate the same governance principles that have long governed our markets. Evidence of recent crises in digital asset markets underscore the benefits of strong corporate governance, rules governing conflicts of interest, and separation of customer property to preserve customer assets as part of a broader default management, recovery, and resilience strategy.

    Segregation of Customer Assets

    Our markets are built on trust. Any market that we supervise should have measures in place to protect the trust and confidence of customers and counterparties. Such recovery, resilience, and default risk management approaches should be applicable across markets that engender similar risks. 
    At the core these default-focused efforts create protections that preserve customer assets in the event of a liquidity or solvency crisis. The measures also guard against the commingling of customer funds witnessed in the 2022 crypto crises.[25] 
    The Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) expressly requires separation of customer funds in certain contexts. Section 4d(a)(2) of the CEA requires each FCM to segregate from its own assets all money, securities, and other property deposited by futures customers to margin, secure, or guarantee futures contracts and options on futures contracts traded on designated contract markets.[26] As the PGW takes up the mantle, preservation of customer capital must be a central and key issue. 

    Governance

    Basic corporate governance and internal controls should form part of the health and welfare of any market participant subject to the Commission’s supervision. Among other obligations, our regulations uniformly call for registered entities to have boards of directors, including independent directors, risk management committees, and executive officers that include chief compliance and risk officers who possess the requisite skills and expertise.[27]
    We continuously refine and update our governance standards as our markets evolve. In 2023, the Commission unanimously (please confirm) approved a final rule requiring derivatives clearing organizations (DCOs) to establish and consult with one or more risk management committees (RMCs) comprised of clearing members and customers of clearing members on matters that could materially affect the risk profile of the DCO. Section 5b(c)(2) of the CEA establishes core principles with which a DCO must comply in order to be registered and to maintain registration as a DCO (DCO Core Principles),1 and part 39 of the Commission’s regulations implement the DCO Core Principles. DCO Core Principle O requires a DCO to establish governance arrangements that are transparent, fulfill public interest requirements, and permit the consideration of the views of owners and participants.2 Regulation § 39.24 implements this aspect of Core Principle O by providing minimum requirements regarding the substance and form of a DCO’s governance arrangements.
    In the earlier referenced 2023 final risk governance rule, the Commission adopted minimum requirements for RMC composition and rotation, and required DCOs to establish and enforce fitness standards for RMC members. The Commission adopted requirements for DCOs to maintain written policies and procedures governing the RMC consultation process and the role of RMC members. Finally, the Commission adopted requirements for DCOs to establish one or more market participant risk advisory working groups (RWGs) that must convene at least twice per year, and adopt written policies and procedures related to the formation and role of the RWG.

    Compliance with AML/KYC laws and regulations

    Our experience regulating financial markets has demonstrated that strong AML/KYC regulations protects not only market integrity and stability, but also national security interests. These regulations are foundational and define the scope of who is permitted to actively engage our markets and, in many instances, the broader financial services and banking sector of our economy.
    Concluding with A Word Collaboration
    One of the greatest strengths of our government and, more specifically, the federal agencies that supervise many of the largest global financial market participants in the world is the intellectual leadership that our market regulators demonstrate. Our financial market regulations enhance efficiency, reduce the costs of raising capital, attract global investments, and serve as a model for regulation around the world. Our successful regulation is due, in large part, to our engagement with markets and the global regulatory community.
    As I noted in keynote remarks last year at NYU’s AI Convening, it is imperative for government and regulators to demonstrate a deep and abiding commitment to developing well-informed, research-based, data-driven regulatory solutions that are well-tailored, fit-for-purpose interventions. This requires a multi-stakeholder, public-private partnership that may include for advancing technologies developers, market participants, academics, government and industry researchers, diverse regulators across the financial markets, and public interest organizations.[28]
    Last year, in response to a staff advisory on the use of AI in CFTC-regulated markets,[29] I noted that “[w]orking in partnership with market participants, we are able to enhance our ability to accomplish our mission of ensuring market stability and market integrity. .”[30]
    I started this week in Davos, Switzerland, where I shared remarks at a conference about blockchain and AI, and about how the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting theme of “Collaboration for the Intelligent Age” is relevant to my work at the CFTC on these topics. World leaders in government, business, and civil society are still there, discussing the most pressing issues facing our global markets and broader societies, and trying to solve problems on a global scale. Nowhere is that more salient than in the United States, as we are close out the first week of a new executive administration.
    When we reflect on the future of finance, we must think back to the lessons learned as markets navigated sustained periods of extreme distress. Collaboration has served as one of the most important tools in our toolkit.
    The creation of the Financial Stability Oversight Council has proved a valuable source for convening the heads of financial market regulators across our government can carefully identifying and addressing anticipated systemic risk concerns. In addition to collaboration across market and prudential regulators, efforts by the SEC and CFTC to navigate implementation of the Dodd-Frank Act rules offers a second example of successful collaboration among market regulators. The discussions regarding regulation of AI, crypto, and other novel and emerging technologies should benefit from similar collaboration across regulators authority and across the aisle.
    Navigating difficult conditions requires focus, discipline, leadership and a steady hand at the helm. In recent years, our markets have navigated the onset of a global pandemic, geopolitical conflicts, sustained inflation.
    I am committed to working together to achieve this goal. As we enter this new year and new administration, collaboration will be as important as ever to achieve the benefits of scale and take advantage of all that innovation has to offer financial markets.
    Simply stated, and echoing this year’s World Economic Forum theme at Davos, we must find a path to collaboration in an intelligent age.

    [3] 328 U.S. 293 (1946).

    [5] Treasury December Report at 15.

    [7] Treasury December Report at 14.

    [8] Treasury December Report at 15.

    [9] Treasury December Report at 16.

    [13] Treasury December Report at 25.

    [16] See Treasury December Report.

    [18] Treasury December Report at 30.

    [19] “While many financial firms operating in the financial services sector are subject to laws and regulations that are technology-agnostic and can apply to AI technologies, respondents noted different regulatory standards among financial firms for the same activities.” Treasury December Report at 28.

    [25] See 1, 17 C.F.R. Pt. 1 (segregation of futures customer funds); 17 C.F.R. Pt. 22 (segregation of swaps customer funds); 17 C.F.R. Pt. 30 (segregation of foreign futures customer funds).

    [26] 7 U.S.C. § 6d(a)(2).

    MIL OSI USA News –

    January 25, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Security: Former CEO of Startup Software Company Sentenced to 30 Months in Federal Prison for Tax Scheme

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

              CONCORD – A Bedford man was sentenced yesterday in federal court for his scheme to willfully fail to pay more than $14 million in payroll taxes owed to the IRS and failing to file and pay his personal taxes, Acting U.S. Attorney Jay McCormack and Acting Deputy Assistant Attorney General Karen E. Kelly of the Justice Department’s Tax Division announce.

              Andrew Park, 49, was sentenced by U.S. District Court Judge Landya McCafferty to 30 months in federal prison and three years of supervised release. She also ordered Park to pay $639,821.78 in restitution, the amount of tax and interest not repaid at the time of sentencing, to the United States. She also ordered Park pay a fine of $15,000. In July 2024, Park pleaded guilty to willful failure to pay over payroll taxes and willful failure to file a tax return.

              Park was the co-founder and CEO of a startup technology company. Park was responsible for all financial matters related to the company, including for filing the company’s quarterly payroll tax returns and collecting and paying over Social Security, Medicare and income taxes withheld from the employees’ wages to the IRS, as well as the matching Social Security and Medicare taxes the company owed. Park was also responsible for collecting and paying over state and local taxes to those respective governments.

              From the company’s founding in 2014 through the third quarter of 2021, Park withheld federal, state and local taxes from the wages of the company’s employees but did not pay them over to the IRS and state and local tax authorities as required by law. He also did not pay over the portion of the payroll taxes that the company owed. Park did so even though a payroll service company that he hired to process the employees’ payroll notified him hundreds of times that the taxes were due, and four employees of the company complained that the Social Security Administration reported no withholdings had been paid over by the company on their behalf.

              From 2013 through 2020, Park also did not file individual tax returns as required by law, despite the fact that he paid himself a salary of approximately $250,000 each year.

              In total, Park caused a tax loss to the IRS exceeding $14.7 million.

              “For many years, the defendant took elaborate steps to defraud the IRS by not filing or paying his personal income taxes and by using his employees’ payroll taxes as free capital to grow his business. Then, when matters got out of hand, he falsely told his investors that his company was tax compliant to secure the funds to try to make the problem disappear,” said Acting United States Attorney Jay McCormack. “The substantial sentence imposed by the court reflects the seriousness of the defendant’s conduct and his disregard for our nation’s tax laws and sends a message to deter other would-be tax fraudsters who might seek to enrich themselves at the expense of honest taxpayers.”

              “Yesterday’s sentencing of Andrew Park is a strong reminder that payment of individual and business taxes is an obligation, not a choice,” said Thomas Demeo, Acting Special Agent in Charge of the Internal Revenue Service Criminal Investigation, Boston Field Office. “When Andrew Park made the decision not to pay taxes for himself and his business, he also made the decision to cheat his employees and other honest taxpayers. Investigations of employment tax fraud is a priority for Internal Revenue Service Criminal Investigation as our system of taxation depends on everybody paying their fair share.”

             IRS-Criminal Investigation led the investigation. Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew T. Hunter and Assistant Chief Eric Powers of the Tax Division are prosecuting the case.  

    ###

     

    MIL Security OSI –

    January 25, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Minutes – Thursday, 23 January 2025 – Strasbourg – Final edition

    Source: European Parliament

    PV-10-2025-01-23

    EN

    EN

    iPlPv_Sit

    Minutes
    Thursday, 23 January 2025 – Strasbourg

     Abbreviations and symbols

    + adopted
    – rejected
    ↓ lapsed
    W withdrawn
    RCV roll-call votes
    EV electronic vote
    SEC secret ballot
    split split vote
    sep separate vote
    am amendment
    CA compromise amendment
    CP corresponding part
    D deleting amendment
    = identical amendments
    § paragraph

    IN THE CHAIR: Younous OMARJEE
    Vice-President

    1. Opening of the sitting

    The sitting opened at 09:01.


    2. Combating Desertification: 16th session of the Conference of the Parties (COP16) of the United Nations Convention (debate)

    Commission statement: Combating Desertification: 16th session of the Conference of the Parties (COP16) of the United Nations Convention (2025/3018(RSP))

    Jessika Roswall (Member of the Commission) made the statement.

    The following spoke: Carmen Crespo Díaz, on behalf of the PPE Group, Marta Temido, on behalf of the S&D Group, Julien Leonardelli, on behalf of the PfE Group, Francesco Ventola, on behalf of the ECR Group, Martin Hojsík, on behalf of the Renew Group, Pär Holmgren, on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group, Catarina Martins, on behalf of The Left Group, Zsuzsanna Borvendég, on behalf of the ESN Group, Christine Schneider, Sakis Arnaoutoglou, Mireia Borrás Pabón, Laurence Trochu, Billy Kelleher, Kai Tegethoff, João Oliveira, Daniel Buda, Maria Grapini, Mathilde Androuët, Marie Toussaint, Valentina Palmisano, Salvatore De Meo, Thomas Bajada, France Jamet, Vicent Marzà Ibáñez, who also answered a blue-card question from João Oliveira, Sebastian Everding, who also answered a blue-card question from Sander Smit, Gabriella Gerzsenyi, César Luena, who also answered a blue-card question from Carmen Crespo Díaz, Jutta Paulus, who also answered a blue-card question from Maria Grapini, Nikolas Farantouris, Borja Giménez Larraz, Camilla Laureti, Marco Falcone, who also answered a blue-card question from Kai Tegethoff, Leire Pajín, Manuela Ripa, Jean-Marc Germain, Dan-Ştefan Motreanu, Stefano Bonaccini and Ştefan Muşoiu.

    The following spoke under the catch-the-eye procedure: Grzegorz Braun, Hélder Sousa Silva and Seán Kelly.

    The following spoke: Jessika Roswall.

    The debate closed.

    (The sitting was suspended for a few moments.)


    IN THE CHAIR: Christel SCHALDEMOSE
    Vice-President

    3. Resumption of the sitting

    The sitting resumed at 10:29.


    4. Cryptocurrencies – need for global standards (debate)

    Commission statement: Cryptocurrencies – need for global standards (2025/2514(RSP))

    Magnus Brunner (Member of the Commission) made the statement.

    The following spoke: Markus Ferber, on behalf of the PPE Group, Jonás Fernández, on behalf of the S&D Group, Pierre Pimpie, on behalf of the PfE Group, Marlena Maląg, on behalf of the ECR Group, Stéphanie Yon-Courtin, on behalf of the Renew Group, Rasmus Andresen, on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group (the President reminded the speaker of the rules on conduct), Pasquale Tridico, on behalf of The Left Group, René Aust, on behalf of the ESN Group, Regina Doherty, Eero Heinäluoma, Aleksandar Nikolic, Guillaume Peltier, Gilles Boyer, Damian Boeselager, Catarina Martins, Stanislav Stoyanov, Kateřina Konečná, Kinga Kollár, Aurore Lalucq, Mathilde Androuët, Adrian-George Axinia, Cynthia Ní Mhurchú, Giuseppe Antoci, Marcin Sypniewski, Luis-Vicențiu Lazarus, Lídia Pereira (the President provided some clarifications on the blue-card procedure), Nikos Papandreou, who also answered a blue-card question from Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă, Angéline Furet, Ondřej Krutílek, Michalis Hadjipantela, Adnan Dibrani, Diego Solier, Andrey Kovatchev, Waldemar Buda, Caterina Chinnici and Seán Kelly.

    The following spoke under the catch-the-eye procedure: Niels Geuking, Maria Grapini, Alexander Jungbluth, Grzegorz Braun, Vytenis Povilas Andriukaitis and Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă.

    The following spoke: Magnus Brunner.

    The debate closed.

    (The sitting was suspended at 11:48.)


    IN THE CHAIR: Sabine VERHEYEN
    Vice-President

    5. Resumption of the sitting

    The sitting resumed at 11:59.


    6. Composition of new committees

    Following the creation of the standing committees on security and defence and on public health, and the creation of the special committees on the European Democracy Shield and on the housing crisis in the European Union, the President had received nominations for membership of these new standing and special committees from the political groups and the non-attached Members, in accordance with Rules 212 and 213.

    The decisions took effect as of that day.

    The lists of Members nominated to form these committees are annexed to these minutes (minutes of 23.1.2025 Annex 1).


    7. Composition of committees and delegations

    The Renew Group and non-attached Members had notified the President of the following decisions changing the composition of committees:

    – ITRE Committee: Oihane Agirregoitia Martínez to replace Barry Andrews, Elena Yoncheva

    – REGI Committee: Elsi Katainen

    – LIBE Committee: Raquel García Hermida-Van Der Walle

    – PETI Committee: Cynthia Ní Mhurchú and Eugen Tomac were no longer members, Taner Kabilov

    The decisions took effect as of that day.

    ⁂

    The following spoke: Jordan Bardella, Carlo Fidanza and Patryk Jaki on points of order (the President cut off the speakers as their remarks did not constitute points of order).


    8. Voting time

    For detailed results of the votes, see also ‘Results of votes’ and ‘Results of roll-call votes’.




    8.2. Systematic repression of human rights in Iran, notably the cases of Pakhshan Azizi and Wrisha Moradi, and the taking of EU citizens as hostages (vote)

    Motions for resolutions RC-B10-0066/2025 (minutes of 23.1.2025, item I), B10-0063/2025, B10-0066/2025, B10-0067/2025, B10-0073/2025, B10-0082/2025, B10-0085/2025 and B10-0086/2025 (minutes of 22.1.2025, item 1) (2025/2511(RSP))

    The debate had taken place on 22 January 2025 (minutes of 22.1.2025, item 16.2).

    (Majority of the votes cast)

    JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION

    Adopted (P10_TA(2025)0004)

    (Motions for resolutions B10-0063/2025 and B10-0067/2025 fell.)

    Detailed voting results








    9. Resumption of the sitting

    The sitting resumed at 15:00.


    10. Approval of the minutes of the previous sitting

    The minutes of the previous sitting were approved.


    11. Major interpellations (debate)

    Major interpellation for written answer with debate (G-001002/2024) submitted by Charlie Weimers, Sebastian Tynkkynen, Kristoffer Storm, Jaak Madison, Carlo Fidanza, Adam Bielan, Alexandr Vondra, Patryk Jaki, Johan Van Overtveldt, Roberts Zīle, Emmanouil Fragkos, Georgiana Teodorescu, Geadis Geadi, Marion Maréchal, Ivaylo Valchev, Kosma Złotowski, Mariusz Kamiński, Maciej Wąsik, Dick Erixon, Joachim Stanisław Brudziński, Beatrice Timgren, Nicolas Bay, Jadwiga Wiśniewska, Ondřej Krutílek, Guillaume Peltier, Michał Dworczyk, Laurence Trochu, Şerban-Dimitrie Sturdza, Tobiasz Bocheński, Gheorghe Piperea, on behalf of the ECR Group, to the Commission: EU funding of physical border protection structures such as walls, fences or other barriers at the external border (B10-0001/2025)

    Jaak Madison moved the major interpellation.

    Magnus Brunner (Member of the Commission) answered the major interpellation.

    The following spoke: Lena Düpont, on behalf of the PPE Group, Ana Catarina Mendes, on behalf of the S&D Group, András László, on behalf of the PfE Group, Joachim Stanisław Brudziński, on behalf of the ECR Group, Fabienne Keller, on behalf of the Renew Group, Mélissa Camara, on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group, Christine Anderson, on behalf of the ESN Group, Fredis Beleris, Murielle Laurent, France Jamet and Riho Terras.

    The following spoke under the catch-the-eye procedure: Kinga Kollár, Bogdan Rzońca and Siegbert Frank Droese.

    The following spoke: Magnus Brunner.

    The debate closed.


    12. Explanations of vote

    Written explanations of vote

    Explanations of vote submitted in writing under Rule 201 appear on the Members’ pages on Parliament’s website.


    13. Approval of the minutes of the sitting and forwarding of texts adopted

    In accordance with Rule 208(3), the minutes of the sitting would be put to the House for approval at the beginning of the afternoon of the sitting on Monday, 10 February 2025.

    With Parliament’s agreement, the texts adopted during the part-session would be forwarded to their respective addressees without delay.


    14. Dates of forthcoming sittings

    The next sitting would be held on 29 January 2025.


    15. Closure of the sitting

    The sitting closed at 15:41.


    16. Adjournment of the session

    The session of the European Parliament was adjourned.

    Alessandro Chiocchetti

    Roberta Metsola

    Secretary-General

    President


    LIST OF DOCUMENTS SERVING AS A BASIS FOR THE DEBATES AND DECISIONS OF PARLIAMENT


    I. Motions for resolutions tabled

    Case of Jean-Jacques Wondo in the Democratic Republic of the Congo

    Joint motion for a resolution tabled under Rule 150(5) and Rule 136(4):

    on the case of Jean-Jacques Wondo in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (2025/2510(RSP)) (RC-B10-0069/2025)
    (replacing motions for resolutions B10-0069/2025, B10-0072/2025, B10-0078/2025, B10-0081/2025 and B10-0084/2025)
    Sebastião Bugalho, Wouter Beke, Isabel Wiseler-Lima, Michael Gahler, Luděk Niedermayer, Christophe Gomart, Antonio López-Istúriz White, Danuše Nerudová, Davor Ivo Stier, Michał Wawrykiewicz, Jessica Polfjärd, Tomáš Zdechovský, Andrey Kovatchev, Inese Vaidere
    on behalf of the PPE Group
    Yannis Maniatis, Francisco Assis, Elio Di Rupo
    on behalf of the S&D Group
    Waldemar Tomaszewski, Joachim Stanisław Brudziński, Sebastian Tynkkynen
    on behalf of the ECR Group
    Bernard Guetta, Petras Auštrevičius, Oihane Agirregoitia Martínez, Malik Azmani, Dan Barna, Benoit Cassart, Olivier Chastel, Svenja Hahn, Karin Karlsbro, Ľubica Karvašová, Ilhan Kyuchyuk, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Urmas Paet, Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann, Hilde Vautmans, Lucia Yar
    on behalf of the Renew Group
    Catarina Vieira
    on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

    Systematic repression of human rights in Iran, notably the cases of Pakhshan Azizi and Wrisha Moradi, and the taking of EU citizens as hostages

    Joint motion for a resolution tabled under Rule 150(5) and Rule 136(4):

    on the systematic repression of human rights in Iran, notably the cases of Pakhshan Azizi and Wrisha Moradi, and the taking of EU citizens as hostages (2025/2511(RSP)) (RC-B10-0066/2025)
    (replacing motions for resolutions B10-0066/2025, B10-0073/2025, B10-0082/2025, B10-0085/2025 and B10-0086/2025)
    Sebastião Bugalho, Tomáš Zdechovský, Loucas Fourlas, Isabel Wiseler-Lima, David McAllister, Michael Gahler, Željana Zovko, Christophe Gomart, Isabel Benjumea Benjumea, Javier Zarzalejos, Luděk Niedermayer, Wouter Beke, Davor Ivo Stier, Michał Wawrykiewicz, Jessica Polfjärd, Danuše Nerudová, Andrey Kovatchev, Inese Vaidere
    on behalf of the PPE Group
    Yannis Maniatis, Francisco Assis, Evin Incir, Chloé Ridel, Daniel Attard, Alessandra Moretti
    on behalf of the S&D Group
    Rihards Kols, Mariusz Kamiński, Sebastian Tynkkynen, Carlo Fidanza, Reinis Pozņaks, Aurelijus Veryga, Ondřej Krutílek, Veronika Vrecionová, Alberico Gambino, Joachim Stanisław Brudziński, Dick Erixon, Beatrice Timgren, Waldemar Tomaszewski, Alexandr Vondra, Marion Maréchal, Małgorzata Gosiewska, Carlo Ciccioli, Charlie Weimers
    on behalf of the ECR Group
    Petras Auštrevičius, Oihane Agirregoitia Martínez, Malik Azmani, Dan Barna, Benoit Cassart, Olivier Chastel, Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová, Bart Groothuis, Bernard Guetta, Svenja Hahn, Karin Karlsbro, Ľubica Karvašová, Ilhan Kyuchyuk, Nathalie Loiseau, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Urmas Paet, Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann, Hilde Vautmans, Sophie Wilmès, Lucia Yar
    on behalf of the Renew Group
    Hannah Neumann
    on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
    Per Clausen, Hanna Gedin, Jonas Sjöstedt

    Case of Boualem Sansal in Algeria

    Joint motion for a resolution tabled under Rule 150(5) and Rule 136(4):

    on the case of Boualem Sansal in Algeria (2025/2512(RSP)) (RC-B10-0087/2025)
    (replacing motions for resolutions B10-0087/2025, B10-0089/2025, B10-0091/2025, B10-0092/2025 and B10-0093/2025)
    Sebastião Bugalho, Christophe Gomart, Isabel Wiseler-Lima, Michael Gahler, Luděk Niedermayer, Wouter Beke, Davor Ivo Stier, Michał Wawrykiewicz, Jessica Polfjärd, Tomáš Zdechovský, Andrey Kovatchev, Inese Vaidere
    on behalf of the PPE Group
    Yannis Maniatis, Francisco Assis, Marta Temido
    on behalf of the S&D Group
    Adam Bielan, Ondřej Krutílek, Veronika Vrecionová, Joachim Stanisław Brudziński, Waldemar Tomaszewski, Alexandr Vondra, Marion Maréchal, Sebastian Tynkkynen, Małgorzata Gosiewska
    on behalf of the ECR Group
    Helmut Brandstätter, Petras Auštrevičius, Malik Azmani, Dan Barna, Benoit Cassart, Olivier Chastel, Bernard Guetta, Ilhan Kyuchyuk, Nathalie Loiseau, Urmas Paet, Lucia Yar
    on behalf of the Renew Group
    Leoluca Orlando
    on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

    Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against Ukraine

    Motions for resolutions tabled under Rule 136(2) to wind up the debate:

    on Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against Ukraine (2024/2988(RSP)) (B10-0074/2025)
    Yannis Maniatis, Nacho Sánchez Amor, Thijs Reuten, Raphaël Glucksmann
    on behalf of the S&D Group

    on Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against Ukraine (2024/2988(RSP)) (B10-0075/2025)
    Rasa Juknevičienė, Michael Gahler, Andrzej Halicki, Sebastião Bugalho, David McAllister, Siegfried Mureşan, Željana Zovko, Isabel Wiseler-Lima, Nicolás Pascual de la Parte, Mika Aaltola, Krzysztof Brejza, Daniel Caspary, Sandra Kalniete, Seán Kelly, Ondřej Kolář, Łukasz Kohut, Andrey Kovatchev, Miriam Lexmann, Antonio López-Istúriz White, Danuše Nerudová, Mirosława Nykiel, Ana Miguel Pedro, Paulius Saudargas, Davor Ivo Stier, Michał Szczerba, Alice Teodorescu Måwe, Ingeborg Ter Laak, Matej Tonin, Pekka Toveri, Inese Vaidere, Milan Zver
    on behalf of the PPE Group

    on Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against Ukraine (2024/2988(RSP)) (B10-0076/2025)
    Sergey Lagodinsky, Hannah Neumann, Markéta Gregorová, Mārtiņš Staķis, Maria Ohisalo, Virginijus Sinkevičius, Villy Søvndal, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Reinier Van Lanschot
    on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

    on Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against Ukraine (2024/2988(RSP)) (B10-0077/2025)
    Bernard Guetta, Petras Auštrevičius, Malik Azmani, Dan Barna, Olivier Chastel, Karin Karlsbro, Ľubica Karvašová, Ilhan Kyuchyuk, Michał Kobosko, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Urmas Paet, Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann, Eugen Tomac, Hilde Vautmans, Sophie Wilmès, Lucia Yar, Dainius Žalimas
    on behalf of the Renew Group

    on Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against Ukraine (2024/2988(RSP)) (B10-0079/2025)
    Adam Bielan, Mariusz Kamiński, Małgorzata Gosiewska, Joachim Stanisław Brudziński, Rihards Kols, Ondřej Krutílek, Jaak Madison, Ivaylo Valchev, Sebastian Tynkkynen, Veronika Vrecionová, Roberts Zīle, Aurelijus Veryga, Maciej Wąsik, Michał Dworczyk, Cristian Terheş, Reinis Pozņaks, Alexandr Vondra
    on behalf of the ECR Group

    Joint motion for a resolution tabled under Rule 136(2) and (4):

    on Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against Ukraine (2024/2988(RSP)) (RC-B10-0074/2025)
    (replacing motions for resolutions B10-0074/2025, B10-0075/2025, B10-0076/2025, B10-0077/2025 and B10-0079/2025)
    Rasa Juknevičienė, Michael Gahler, Andrzej Halicki, Sebastião Bugalho, David McAllister, Siegfried Mureşan, Željana Zovko, Isabel Wiseler-Lima, Nicolás Pascual de la Parte, Mika Aaltola, Krzysztof Brejza, Daniel Caspary, Sandra Kalniete, Seán Kelly, Ondřej Kolář, Łukasz Kohut, Andrey Kovatchev, Miriam Lexmann, Antonio López-Istúriz White, Danuše Nerudová, Mirosława Nykiel, Ana Miguel Pedro, Paulius Saudargas, Davor Ivo Stier, Michał Szczerba, Alice Teodorescu Måwe, Ingeborg Ter Laak, Matej Tonin, Pekka Toveri, Inese Vaidere, Milan Zver
    on behalf of the PPE Group
    Yannis Maniatis, Nacho Sánchez Amor, Thijs Reuten, Raphaël Glucksmann
    on behalf of the S&D Group
    Adam Bielan, Rihards Kols, Reinis Pozņaks, Jadwiga Wiśniewska, Roberts Zīle, Ondřej Krutílek, Veronika Vrecionová, Jaak Madison, Małgorzata Gosiewska, Cristian Terheş, Maciej Wąsik, Ivaylo Valchev, Aurelijus Veryga, Joachim Stanisław Brudziński
    on behalf of the ECR Group
    Bernard Guetta, Petras Auštrevičius, Malik Azmani, Dan Barna, Benoit Cassart, Olivier Chastel, Karin Karlsbro, Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová, Ľubica Karvašová, Ilhan Kyuchyuk, Michał Kobosko, Nathalie Loiseau, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Urmas Paet, Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann, Eugen Tomac, Hilde Vautmans, Sophie Wilmès, Lucia Yar, Dainius Žalimas
    on behalf of the Renew Group
    Sergey Lagodinsky
    on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

    Situation in Venezuela following the usurpation of the presidency on 10 January 2025

    Motions for resolutions tabled under Rule 136(2) to wind up the debate:

    on the situation in Venezuela following the usurpation of the presidency on 10 January 2025 (2025/2519(RSP)) (B10-0064/2025)
    Gabriel Mato, Sebastião Bugalho, Davor Ivo Stier
    on behalf of the PPE Group

    on the situation in Venezuela following the usurpation of the presidency on 10 January 2025 (2025/2519(RSP)) (B10-0068/2025)
    Jorge Buxadé Villalba, Hermann Tertsch, Jorge Martín Frías, Silvia Sardone, Nikola Bartůšek, Susanna Ceccardi, Roberto Vannacci, António Tânger Corrêa, Enikő Győri
    on behalf of the PfE Group

    on the situation in Venezuela following the usurpation of the presidency on 10 January 2025 (2025/2519(RSP)) (B10-0071/2025)
    Leire Pajín
    on behalf of the S&D Group
    Catarina Vieira, Ville Niinistö, Nicolae Ştefănuță
    on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

    on the situation in Venezuela following the usurpation of the presidency on 10 January 2025 (2025/2519(RSP)) (B10-0080/2025)
    Oihane Agirregoitia Martínez, Petras Auštrevičius, Malik Azmani, Dan Barna, Helmut Brandstätter, Benoit Cassart, Olivier Chastel, João Cotrim De Figueiredo, Valérie Devaux, Karin Karlsbro, Ľubica Karvašová, Ilhan Kyuchyuk, Urmas Paet, Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann, Ana Vasconcelos, Hilde Vautmans, Lucia Yar
    on behalf of the Renew Group

    on the situation in Venezuela following the usurpation of the presidency on 10 January 2025 (2025/2519(RSP)) (B10-0083/2025)
    Carlo Fidanza, Adam Bielan, Mariusz Kamiński, Alberico Gambino, Waldemar Tomaszewski, Joachim Stanisław Brudziński, Diego Solier, Rihards Kols, Ondřej Krutílek, Jaak Madison, Nora Junco García, Şerban-Dimitrie Sturdza, Sebastian Tynkkynen, Veronika Vrecionová, Małgorzata Gosiewska, Jadwiga Wiśniewska, Alexandr Vondra
    on behalf of the ECR Group

    Joint motion for a resolution tabled under Rule 150(5) and Rule 136(4):

    on the situation in Venezuela following the usurpation of the presidency on 10 January 2025 (2025/2519(RSP)) (RC-B10-0064/2025)
    (replacing motions for resolutions B10-0064/2025, B10-0080/2025 and B10-0083/2025)
    Gabriel Mato, Sebastião Bugalho, Davor Ivo Stier, Francisco José Millán Mon
    on behalf of the PPE Group
    Carlo Fidanza, Adam Bielan, Mariusz Kamiński, Ivaylo Valchev, Sebastian Tynkkynen, Ondřej Krutílek, Veronika Vrecionová, Rihards Kols, Alexandr Vondra, Małgorzata Gosiewska, Alberico Gambino, Joachim Stanisław Brudziński
    on behalf of the ECR Group
    Oihane Agirregoitia Martínez, Petras Auštrevičius, Dan Barna, Helmut Brandstätter, Benoit Cassart, Olivier Chastel, Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová, João Cotrim De Figueiredo, Karin Karlsbro, Ľubica Karvašová, Ilhan Kyuchyuk, Urmas Paet, Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann, Ana Vasconcelos, Hilde Vautmans, Lucia Yar
    on behalf of the Renew Group


    II. Decisions to draw up own-initiative reports

    Decisions to draw up own-initiative reports (Rule 55)

    (Following the Conference of Presidents’ decision of 15 January 2025)

    AFCO Committee

    – Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States (2025/2028(INI))

    – Institutional aspects of the Report on the future of European Competitiveness (Draghi Report) (2025/2013(INI))

    – Stock-taking of the European elections 2024 (2025/2012(INI))

    AFET Committee

    – 2023 and 2024 Commission reports on Ukraine (2025/2026(INI))

    – 2023 and 2024 Commission reports on Moldova (2025/2025(INI))

    – 2023 and 2024 Commission reports on Georgia (2025/2024(INI))

    – 2023 and 2024 Commission reports on Türkiye (2025/2023(INI))

    – 2023 and 2024 Commission reports on Serbia (2025/2022(INI))

    – 2023 and 2024 Commission reports on North Macedonia (2025/2021(INI))

    – 2023 and 2024 Commission reports on Montenegro (2025/2020(INI))

    – 2023 and 2024 Commission reports on Kosovo (2025/2019(INI))

    – 2023 and 2024 Commission reports on Bosnia and Herzegovina (2025/2018(INI))

    – 2023 and 2024 Commission reports on Albania (2025/2017(INI))

    DEVE Committee

    – Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in Seville (2025/2004(INI))

    – Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political Forum (2025/2014(INI))
    (opinion: FEMM)

    IMCO Committee

    – Implementation and streamlining of EU internal market rules to strengthen the single market (2025/2009(INI))

    ITRE Committee

    – Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitiveness (2025/2008(INI))

    – European technological sovereignty and digital infrastructure (2025/2007(INI))

    – Electricity grids: the backbone of the EU energy system (2025/2006(INI))

    JURI Committee

    – Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023 and 2024 (2025/2016(INI))
    (opinion: PETI)

    – European Union regulatory fitness and subsidiarity and proportionality – report on Better Law-Making covering 2023 and 2024 (2025/2015(INI))

    PECH Committee

    – Fisheries management approaches for safeguarding sensitive species, tackling invasive species and benefiting local economies (2025/2011(INI))

    – The role of social, economic and environmental standards in safeguarding fair competition for all aquatic food products and improving food security (2025/2010(INI))

    PETI Committee

    – Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2023 (2025/2027(INI))

    (Following the Conference of Presidents’ decision of 19 December 2024)

    – The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward (2024/2127(INI))

    – The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basins (2024/2126(INI))

    – Decarbonisation and modernisation of EU fisheries, and the development and deployment of fishing gear (2024/2123(INI))

    AGRI Committee

    – The position of farmers in the agri-food value chain (2024/2122(INI))

    ECON Committee

    – The role of simple tax rules and tax fragmentation in European competitiveness (2024/2118(INI))

    – A coherent tax framework for the EU’s financial sector (2024/2117(INI))

    – Facilitating the financing of investments and reforms to boost European competitiveness and creating a Capital Markets Union (Draghi Report) (2024/2116(INI))
    (opinion: BUDG)

    FEMM Committee

    – Gender Equality Strategy 2025 (2024/2125(INI))
    (opinion: LIBE)

    – Women’s entrepreneurship in rural and island areas and outermost regions (2024/2124(INI))
    (opinion: AGRI)

    IMCO Committee

    – A new legislative framework for products that is fit for the digital and sustainable transition (2024/2119(INI))

    REGI Committee

    – The role of cohesion policy in supporting the just transition (2024/2121(INI))
    (opinion: EMPL)

    – The role of cohesion policy investment in resolving the current housing crisis (2024/2120(INI))
    (opinion: EMPL)


    III. Consent procedure

    Reports with a motion for a non-legislative resolution (consent procedure) (Rule 107(5))

    (Following notification by the Conference of Committee Chairs on 15 January 2025)

    AFET Committee

    – Interim report in view of the consent procedure on the Agreement establishing an association between the EU and the Principality of Andorra and the Republic of San Marino (2024/0101R(NLE) – 2024/0101(NLE))
    (opinion: ECON, IMCO)


    IV. Petitions

    Petitions Nos 1427-24 to 1518-24 had been entered in the register on 17 January 2025 and had been forwarded to the committee responsible, in accordance with Rule 232(9) and (10).

    The President had, on 17 January 2025, forwarded to the committee responsible, in accordance with Rule 232(15), petitions addressed to the European Parliament by natural or legal persons who were not citizens of the European Union and who did not reside, or have their registered office, in a Member State.


    V. Documents received

    The following documents had been received from Members:

    – Mathilde Androuët, Gerolf Annemans, Jordan Bardella, Nikola Bartůšek, Rachel Blom, Barbara Bonte, Paolo Borchia, Mireia Borrás Pabón, Irmhild Boßdorf, Jaroslav Bžoch, Klara Dostalova, Marieke Ehlers, Dick Erixon, Tomasz Froelich, Petras Gražulis, Branko Grims, Catherine Griset, Enikő Győri, Roman Haider, Fernand Kartheiser, Ondřej Knotek, Vilis Krištopans, Julien Leonardelli, Jorge Martín Frías, Milan Mazurek, Tiago Moreira de Sá, Jana Nagyová, Hans Neuhoff, Julie Rechagneux, Dominik Tarczyński, Hermann Tertsch, Isabella Tovaglieri, António Tânger Corrêa, Milan Uhrík, Tom Vandendriessche, Harald Vilimsky, Ewa Zajączkowska-Hernik and Auke Zijlstra. Motion for a resolution on Dismantling Overregulation and Government Encroachment: reclaiming competitiveness and innovation in the European Union (B10-0214/2024)
    referred to committee responsible: JURI
    opinion: ITRE

    – Pekka Toveri and Sebastian Tynkkynen. Motion for a resolution on restricting the ability of passenger and cargo traffic to enter European Union airspace from Russia (B10-0220/2024)
    referred to committee responsible: TRAN
    opinion: AFET

    – Matthieu Valet. Motion for a resolution on EU policy on Syrian refugees following the overthrow of the Bashar al-Assad regime (B10-0237/2024)
    referred to committee responsible: LIBE

    – Christine Anderson, Anja Arndt, René Aust, Arno Bausemer, Zsuzsanna Borvendég, Markus Buchheit, Petr Bystron, Elisabeth Dieringer, Siegbert Frank Droese, Marc Jongen, Mary Khan, Sarah Knafo, Maximilian Krah and Jaroslava Pokorná Jermanová. Motion for a resolution on financial and organisational support for Member States to repatriate Syrian nationals (B10-0238/2024)
    referred to committee responsible: LIBE


    ATTENDANCE REGISTER

    Present:

    Aaltola Mika, Abadía Jover Maravillas, Adamowicz Magdalena, Aftias Georgios, Agirregoitia Martínez Oihane, Agius Peter, Agius Saliba Alex, Allione Grégory, Al-Sahlani Abir, Anadiotis Nikolaos, Anderson Christine, Andersson Li, Andresen Rasmus, Andrews Barry, Andriukaitis Vytenis Povilas, Androuët Mathilde, Angel Marc, Annemans Gerolf, Antoci Giuseppe, Arias Echeverría Pablo, Arimont Pascal, Arłukowicz Bartosz, Arnaoutoglou Sakis, Arndt Anja, Arvanitis Konstantinos, Asens Llodrà Jaume, Assis Francisco, Attard Daniel, Aubry Manon, Auštrevičius Petras, Axinia Adrian-George, Azmani Malik, Bajada Thomas, Baljeu Jeannette, Ballarín Cereza Laura, Bardella Jordan, Barley Katarina, Barna Dan, Barrena Arza Pernando, Bartulica Stephen Nikola, Bartůšek Nikola, Bausemer Arno, Bay Nicolas, Bay Christophe, Beke Wouter, Beleris Fredis, Bellamy François-Xavier, Benea Adrian-Dragoş, Benifei Brando, Benjumea Benjumea Isabel, Beňová Monika, Berendsen Tom, Berger Stefan, Berg Sibylle, Berlato Sergio, Bernhuber Alexander, Biedroń Robert, Bielan Adam, Bischoff Gabriele, Blaha Ľuboš, Blinkevičiūtė Vilija, Blom Rachel, Bloss Michael, Bocheński Tobiasz, Boeselager Damian, Bogdan Ioan-Rareş, Bonaccini Stefano, Bonte Barbara, Borchia Paolo, Borrás Pabón Mireia, Borvendég Zsuzsanna, Borzan Biljana, Bosanac Gordan, Bosse Stine, Botenga Marc, Boyer Gilles, Boylan Lynn, Brandstätter Helmut, Brasier-Clain Marie-Luce, Braun Grzegorz, Brejza Krzysztof, Bricmont Saskia, Brnjac Nikolina, Brudziński Joachim Stanisław, Bryłka Anna, Buczek Tomasz, Buda Daniel, Buda Waldemar, Budka Borys, Bugalho Sebastião, Buła Andrzej, Burkhardt Delara, Buxadé Villalba Jorge, Bžoch Jaroslav, Camara Mélissa, Canfin Pascal, Carberry Nina, Casa David, Caspary Daniel, Cassart Benoit, Castillo Laurent, del Castillo Vera Pilar, Cavazzini Anna, Cavedagna Stefano, Ceccardi Susanna, Cepeda José, Ceulemans Estelle, Chahim Mohammed, Chaibi Leila, Chastel Olivier, Chinnici Caterina, Christensen Asger, Ciccioli Carlo, Cifrová Ostrihoňová Veronika, Ciriani Alessandro, Cisint Anna Maria, Clausen Per, Clergeau Christophe, Cormand David, Corrado Annalisa, Costanzo Vivien, Cotrim De Figueiredo João, Cowen Barry, Cremer Tobias, Crespo Díaz Carmen, Cristea Andi, Cunha Paulo, Danielsson Johan, Dauchy Marie, Dávid Dóra, David Ivan, Decaro Antonio, de la Hoz Quintano Raúl, Della Valle Danilo, Deloge Valérie, De Masi Fabio, De Meo Salvatore, Demirel Özlem, Deutsch Tamás, Devaux Valérie, Dibrani Adnan, Diepeveen Ton, Dieringer Elisabeth, Dîncu Vasile, Di Rupo Elio, Doherty Regina, Doleschal Christian, Dömötör Csaba, Do Nascimento Cabral Paulo, Donazzan Elena, Dorfmann Herbert, Dostál Ondřej, Droese Siegbert Frank, Düpont Lena, Ecke Matthias, Ehler Christian, Ehlers Marieke, Eriksson Sofie, Erixon Dick, Eroglu Engin, Everding Sebastian, Ezcurra Almansa Alma, Falcone Marco, Farantouris Nikolas, Farreng Laurence, Farský Jan, Ferber Markus, Fernández Jonás, Fidanza Carlo, Fiocchi Pietro, Firmenich Ruth, Fita Claire, Fourlas Loucas, Fourreau Emma, Fragkos Emmanouil, Freund Daniel, Frigout Anne-Sophie, Fritzon Heléne, Froelich Tomasz, Fuglsang Niels, Furet Angéline, Furore Mario, Gahler Michael, Galán Estrella, Gálvez Lina, Gambino Alberico, García Hermida-Van Der Walle Raquel, Garraud Jean-Paul, Gasiuk-Pihowicz Kamila, Geadi Geadis, Gedin Hanna, Geese Alexandra, Geier Jens, Geisel Thomas, Gemma Chiara, Georgiou Giorgos, Gerbrandy Gerben-Jan, Germain Jean-Marc, Gerzsenyi Gabriella, Geuking Niels, Gieseke Jens, Giménez Larraz Borja, Girauta Vidal Juan Carlos, Glavak Sunčana, Glück Andreas, Glucksmann Raphaël, Goerens Charles, Gomart Christophe, Gomes Isilda, Gómez López Sandra, Gonçalves Bruno, Gonçalves Sérgio, González Pons Esteban, Gori Giorgio, Gosiewska Małgorzata, Gotink Dirk, Gozi Sandro, Grapini Maria, Gražulis Petras, Grims Branko, Griset Catherine, Gronkiewicz-Waltz Hanna, Groothuis Bart, Grossmann Elisabeth, Grudler Christophe, Gualmini Elisabetta, Guarda Cristina, Guetta Bernard, Guzenina Maria, Hadjipantela Michalis, Hahn Svenja, Haider Roman, Halicki Andrzej, Hassan Rima, Häusling Martin, Hava Mircea-Gheorghe, Hazekamp Anja, Heide Hannes, Heinäluoma Eero, Henriksson Anna-Maja, Herbst Niclas, Herranz García Esther, Hetman Krzysztof, Hohlmeier Monika, Hojsík Martin, Holmgren Pär, Hölvényi György, Homs Ginel Alicia, Humberto Sérgio, Ijabs Ivars, Imart Céline, Incir Evin, Inselvini Paolo, Iovanovici Şoşoacă Diana, Jalloul Muro Hana, Jamet France, Jerković Romana, Jongen Marc, Joński Dariusz, Joron Virginie, Jouvet Pierre, Joveva Irena, Juknevičienė Rasa, Junco García Nora, Jungbluth Alexander, Kabilov Taner, Kalfon François, Kaljurand Marina, Kalniete Sandra, Kamiński Mariusz, Kanev Radan, Karlsbro Karin, Kartheiser Fernand, Karvašová Ľubica, Katainen Elsi, Kefalogiannis Emmanouil, Kelleher Billy, Keller Fabienne, Kelly Seán, Kemp Martine, Kennes Rudi, Khan Mary, Kobosko Michał, Köhler Stefan, Kohut Łukasz, Kokalari Arba, Kolář Ondřej, Kollár Kinga, Kols Rihards, Konečná Kateřina, Kopacz Ewa, Körner Moritz, Kountoura Elena, Kovatchev Andrey, Krah Maximilian, Krištopans Vilis, Kruis Sebastian, Krutílek Ondřej, Kubín Tomáš, Kuhnke Alice, Kulja András Tivadar, Kulmuni Katri, Kyllönen Merja, Kyuchyuk Ilhan, Lagodinsky Sergey, Lakos Eszter, Lalucq Aurore, Lange Bernd, Langensiepen Katrin, Laššáková Judita, László András, Laurent Murielle, Laureti Camilla, Laykova Rada, Lazarov Ilia, Lazarus Luis-Vicențiu, Le Callennec Isabelle, Leggeri Fabrice, Lenaers Jeroen, Leonardelli Julien, Lewandowski Janusz, Lexmann Miriam, Liese Peter, Lins Norbert, Loiseau Nathalie, Løkkegaard Morten, Lopatka Reinhold, López Javi, López Aguilar Juan Fernando, López-Istúriz White Antonio, Lövin Isabella, Luena César, Łukacijewska Elżbieta Katarzyna, Lupo Giuseppe, McAllister David, Madison Jaak, Magoni Lara, Maij Marit, Maląg Marlena, Manda Claudiu, Mandl Lukas, Maniatis Yannis, Mantovani Mario, Maran Pierfrancesco, Marczułajtis-Walczak Jagna, Mariani Thierry, Marino Ignazio Roberto, Martín Frías Jorge, Martins Catarina, Martusciello Fulvio, Marzà Ibáñez Vicent, Matthieu Sara, Mavrides Costas, Mayer Georg, Mazurek Milan, Mažylis Liudas, McNamara Michael, Mebarek Nora, Mehnert Alexandra, Meleti Eleonora, Mendes Ana Catarina, Mendia Idoia, Mertens Verena, Mesure Marina, Metsola Roberta, Metz Tilly, Mikser Sven, Millán Mon Francisco José, Miranda Paz Ana, Molnár Csaba, Montero Irene, Montserrat Dolors, Morace Carolina, Moreira de Sá Tiago, Moreno Sánchez Javier, Moretti Alessandra, Motreanu Dan-Ştefan, Mularczyk Arkadiusz, Müller Piotr, Mullooly Ciaran, Mureşan Siegfried, Muşoiu Ştefan, Nagyová Jana, Navarrete Rojas Fernando, Negrescu Victor, Nemec Matjaž, Nerudová Danuše, Nesci Denis, Neuhoff Hans, Neumann Hannah, Nevado del Campo Elena, Niebler Angelika, Niedermayer Luděk, Niinistö Ville, Nikolic Aleksandar, Ní Mhurchú Cynthia, Noichl Maria, Nordqvist Rasmus, Novakov Andrey, Nykiel Mirosława, Obajtek Daniel, Ódor Ľudovít, Oetjen Jan-Christoph, Ohisalo Maria, Oliveira João, Olivier Philippe, Omarjee Younous, Ondruš Branislav, Ó Ríordáin Aodhán, Ozdoba Jacek, Paet Urmas, Pajín Leire, Palmisano Valentina, Papadakis Kostas, Papandreou Nikos, Pappas Nikos, Pascual de la Parte Nicolás, Pedro Ana Miguel, Pedulla’ Gaetano, Pellerin-Carlin Thomas, Peltier Guillaume, Penkova Tsvetelina, Pennelle Gilles, Pereira Lídia, Peter-Hansen Kira Marie, Petrov Hristo, Picaro Michele, Picula Tonino, Piera Pascale, Pimpie Pierre, Piperea Gheorghe, de la Pisa Carrión Margarita, Pokorná Jermanová Jaroslava, Polato Daniele, Polfjärd Jessica, Popescu Virgil-Daniel, Pozņaks Reinis, Princi Giusi, Protas Jacek, Pürner Friedrich, Rackete Carola, Radev Emil, Radtke Dennis, Rafowicz Emma, Ratas Jüri, Rechagneux Julie, Regner Evelyn, Repasi René, Repp Sabrina, Ressler Karlo, Reuten Thijs, Riba i Giner Diana, Ricci Matteo, Riehl Nela, Ripa Manuela, Rodrigues André, Ros Sempere Marcos, Roth Neveďalová Katarína, Rougé André, Ruissen Bert-Jan, Ruotolo Sandro, Rzońca Bogdan, Saeidi Arash, Salini Massimiliano, Salis Ilaria, Salla Aura, Sánchez Amor Nacho, Sanchez Julien, Sancho Murillo Elena, Saramo Jussi, Sardone Silvia, Šarec Marjan, Sargiacomo Eric, Satouri Mounir, Saudargas Paulius, Sbai Majdouline, Sberna Antonella, Schaldemose Christel, Schaller-Baross Ernő, Schenk Oliver, Scheuring-Wielgus Joanna, Schieder Andreas, Schilling Lena, Schneider Christine, Schwab Andreas, Scuderi Benedetta, Seekatz Ralf, Sell Alexander, Serrano Sierra Rosa, Serra Sánchez Isabel, Sienkiewicz Bartłomiej, Simon Sven, Singer Christine, Sinkevičius Virginijus, Sippel Birgit, Sjöstedt Jonas, Śmiszek Krzysztof, Smith Anthony, Smit Sander, Sokol Tomislav, Solier Diego, Sommen Liesbet, Sonneborn Martin, Sorel Malika, Sousa Silva Hélder, Søvndal Villy, Squarta Marco, Staķis Mārtiņš, Stancanelli Raffaele, Stier Davor Ivo, Stöteler Sebastiaan, Stoyanov Stanislav, Strack-Zimmermann Marie-Agnes, Strada Cecilia, Streit Joachim, Strik Tineke, Strolenberg Anna, Stürgkh Anna, Sypniewski Marcin, Szczerba Michał, Szekeres Pál, Szydło Beata, Tamburrano Dario, Tânger Corrêa António, Tarquinio Marco, Târziu Claudiu-Richard, Tavares Carla, Tegethoff Kai, Temido Marta, Teodorescu Georgiana, Teodorescu Måwe Alice, Ter Laak Ingeborg, Terras Riho, Thionnet Pierre-Romain, Timgren Beatrice, Tinagli Irene, Tobback Bruno, Tobé Tomas, Tolassy Rody, Tomašič Zala, Tomc Romana, Tonin Matej, Toom Jana, Topo Raffaele, Torselli Francesco, Tosi Flavio, Toussaint Marie, Toveri Pekka, Tridico Pasquale, Trochu Laurence, Tsiodras Dimitris, Tudose Mihai, Tynkkynen Sebastian, Uhrík Milan, Ušakovs Nils, Vaidere Inese, Valchev Ivaylo, Vălean Adina, Valet Matthieu, Van Brempt Kathleen, Van Brug Anouk, van den Berg Brigitte, Vandendriessche Tom, Van Dijck Kris, Van Lanschot Reinier, Van Leeuwen Jessika, Vannacci Roberto, Van Overtveldt Johan, Van Sparrentak Kim, Varaut Alexandre, Vasconcelos Ana, Vasile-Voiculescu Vlad, Vautmans Hilde, Vedrenne Marie-Pierre, Ventola Francesco, Verheyen Sabine, Verougstraete Yvan, Veryga Aurelijus, Vieira Catarina, Vigenin Kristian, Vilimsky Harald, Vincze Loránt, Vind Marianne, Vistisen Anders, Vivaldini Mariateresa, Volgin Petar, von der Schulenburg Michael, Vondra Alexandr, Voss Axel, Vozemberg-Vrionidi Elissavet, Vrecionová Veronika, Vázquez Lázara Adrián, Waitz Thomas, Walsmann Marion, Warborn Jörgen, Warnke Jan-Peter, Wąsik Maciej, Wawrykiewicz Michał, Wcisło Marta, Wechsler Andrea, Werbrouck Séverine, Wiesner Emma, Wiezik Michal, Wilmès Sophie, Winkler Iuliu, Winzig Angelika, Wiseler-Lima Isabel, Wiśniewska Jadwiga, Wölken Tiemo, Wolters Lara, Yar Lucia, Yon-Courtin Stéphanie, Zacharia Maria, Zajączkowska-Hernik Ewa, Zalewska Anna, Žalimas Dainius, Zan Alessandro, Zarzalejos Javier, Zdechovský Tomáš, Zdrojewski Bogdan Andrzej, Zijlstra Auke, Zīle Roberts, Zingaretti Nicola, Złotowski Kosma, Zoido Álvarez Juan Ignacio, Zovko Željana, Zver Milan

    Excused:

    Sidl Günther


    ANNEX 1 – Composition of new committees

    C01A SEDE

    [ 20/01/2025 – ]

    Комисия по сигурност и отбрана

    Comisión de Seguridad y Defensa

    Výbor pro bezpečnost a obranu

    Udvalget om Sikkerhed og Forsvar

    Ausschuss für Sicherheit und Verteidigung

    Julgeoleku- ja kaitsekomisjon

    Επιτροπή Ασφάλειας και Άμυνας

    Committee on Security and Defence

    Commission de la sécurité et de la défense

    An Coiste um Shlándáil agus Cosaint

    Odbor za sigurnost i obranu

    Commissione per la sicurezza e la difesa

    Drošības un aizsardzības komiteja

    Saugumo ir gynybos komitetas

    ssBiztonság- és Védelempolitikai Bizottság

    Kumitat għas-Sigurtà u d-Difiża

    Commissie veiligheid en defensie

    Komisja Bezpieczeństwa i Obrony

    Comissão da Segurança e da Defesa

    Comisia pentru securitate și apărare

    Výbor pre bezpečnosť a obranu

    Odbor za varnost in obrambo

    Turvallisuus- ja puolustuspolitiikan valiokunta

    Utskottet för säkerhet och försvar

    (43 members)

    PPE (11)

    BEKE Wouter

    DE MEO Salvatore

    GOMART Christophe

    HERBST Niclas

    MEIMARAKIS Vangelis

    NOVAKOV Andrey

    PASCUAL DE LA PARTE Nicolás

    SZCZERBA Michał

    TEODORESCU MÅWE Alice

    TERRAS Riho

    TOVERI Pekka

    S&D (8)

    CREMER Tobias

    DI RUPO Elio

    GLUCKSMANN Raphaël

    LÓPEZ Javi

    MAVRIDES Costas

    MENDES Ana Catarina

    MIKSER Sven

    TUDOSE Mihai

    PfE (5)

    HÖLVÉNYI György

    POKORNÁ JERMANOVÁ Jaroslava

    STÖTELER Sebastiaan

    THIONNET Pierre-Romain

    VANNACCI Roberto

    ECR (5)

    DONAZZAN Elena

    DWORCZYK Michał

    GAMBINO Alberico

    POZŅAKS Reinis

    VONDRA Alexandr

    Renew (5)

    AUŠTREVIČIUS Petras

    LOISEAU Nathalie

    ŠAREC Marjan

    STRACK-ZIMMERMANN Marie-Agnes

    YAR Lucia

    Verts/ALE (3)

    NEUMANN Hannah

    STAĶIS Mārtiņš

    VAN LANSCHOT Reinier

    The Left (3)

    BOTENGA Marc

    DEMIREL Özlem

    KYLLÖNEN Merja

    ESN (1)

    NEUHOFF Hans

    NI (2)

    PAPADAKIS Kostas

    VON DER SCHULENBURG Michael

    C08A SANT

    [ 20/01/2025 – ]

    Комисия по обществено здраве

    Comisión de Salud Pública

    Výbor pro veřejné zdraví

    Udvalget om Folkesundhed

    Ausschuss für öffentliche Gesundheit

    Rahvatervishoiu komisjon

    Επιτροπή Δημόσιας Υγείας

    Committee on Public Health

    Commission de la santé publique

    An Coiste um Shláinte Phoiblí

    Odbor za javno zdravlje

    Commissione per la sanità pubblica

    Sabiedrības veselības komiteja

    Visuomenės sveikatos komitetas

    Közegészségügyi Bizottság

    Kumitat għas-Saħħa Pubblika

    Commissie volksgezondheid

    Komisja Zdrowia Publicznego

    Comissão da Saúde Pública

    Comisia pentru sănătate publică

    Výbor pre verejné zdravie

    Odbor za javno zdravje

    Kansanterveyden valiokunta

    Utskottet för folkhälsa

    (43 members)

    PPE (11)

    ARŁUKOWICZ Bartosz

    CASTILLO Laurent

    HADJIPANTELA Michalis

    JARUBAS Adam

    KULJA András Tivadar

    LIESE Peter

    MORATTI Letizia

    NEVADO DEL CAMPO Elena

    POLFJÄRD Jessica

    SCHENK Oliver

    SOKOL Tomislav

    S&D (8)

    ANDRIUKAITIS Vytenis Povilas

    CLERGEAU Christophe

    GONZÁLEZ CASARES Nicolás

    JERKOVIĆ Romana

    MORETTI Alessandra

    NEGRESCU Victor

    PAPANDREOU Nikos

    WÖLKEN Tiemo

    PfE (5)

    BRASIER-CLAIN Marie-Luce

    DE LA PISA CARRIÓN Margarita

    FERENC Viktória

    HAUSER Gerald

    KNOTEK Ondřej

    ECR (5)

    BUDA Waldemar

    FRAGKOS Emmanouil

    PICARO Michele

    RAZZA Ruggero

    TROCHU Laurence

    Renew (5)

    BOSSE Stine

    CANFIN Pascal

    CHASTEL Olivier

    CIFROVÁ OSTRIHOŇOVÁ Veronika

    VASILE-VOICULESCU Vlad

    Verts/ALE (3)

    HÄUSLING Martin

    MARINO Ignazio Roberto

    METZ Tilly

    The Left (3)

    MARTINS Catarina

    PALMISANO Valentina

    TAMBURRANO Dario

    ESN (1)

    ANDERSON Christine

    NI (2)

    BEŇOVÁ Monika

    DOSTÁL Ondřej

    CS01 EUDS

    [ 20/01/2025 – ]

    Специална комисия относно европейския щит за демокрацията

    Comisión Especial sobre el Escudo Europeo de la Democracia

    Zvláštní výbor pro Evropský štít pro demokracii

    Det Særlige Udvalg om Det Europæiske Demokratiskjold

    Sonderausschuss für den Europäischen Schutzschild für die Demokratie

    Euroopa demokraatia kaitse erikomisjon

    Ειδική Επιτροπή για την Ευρωπαϊκή Ασπίδα Δημοκρατίας

    Special committee on the European Democracy Shield

    Commission spéciale sur le bouclier européen de la démocratie

    An Coiste Speisialta um an Sciath Eorpach don Daonlathas

    Posebni odbor za europski štit za zaštitu demokracije

    Commissione speciale sullo scudo europeo per la democrazia

    Īpašā komiteja attiecībā uz Eiropas demokrātijas vairogu

    Specialusis komitetas Europos demokratijos skydo klausimais

    Az európai demokráciapajzzsal foglalkozó különbizottság

    Kumitat Speċjali dwar it-Tarka Ewropea għad-Demokrazija

    Bijzondere Commissie inzake een schild voor de Europese democratie

    Komisja Specjalna ds. Europejskiej Tarczy Demokracji

    Comissão Especial sobre o Escudo Europeu da Democracia

    Comisia specială pentru Scutul democrației europene

    Osobitný výbor pre európsky štít na obranu demokracie

    Posebni odbor za evropski ščit za demokracijo

    Eurooppalaista demokratian kilpeä käsittelevä erityisvaliokunta

    Särskilda utskottet för det europeiska demokratiförsvaret

    (33 members)

    PPE (9)

    AALTOLA Mika

    BOGDAN Ioan-Rareş

    DÜPONT Lena

    KALNIETE Sandra

    MARTUSCIELLO Fulvio

    SIENKIEWICZ Bartłomiej

    TOBÉ Tomas

    ZDECHOVSKÝ Tomáš

    ZOIDO ÁLVAREZ Juan Ignacio

    S&D (6)

    DÎNCU Vasile

    MENDES Ana Catarina

    MOLNÁR Csaba

    PICIERNO Pina

    SCHALDEMOSE Christel

    VAN BREMPT Kathleen

    PfE (4)

    BŽOCH Jaroslav

    LEGGERI Fabrice

    SCHALLER-BAROSS Ernő

    TÂNGER CORRÊA António

    ECR (4)

    CAVEDAGNA Stefano

    KANKO Assita

    SZYDŁO Beata

    TERHEŞ Cristian

    Renew (4)

    BRANDSTÄTTER Helmut

    GROOTHUIS Bart

    LOISEAU Nathalie

    WILMÈS Sophie

    Verts/ALE (2)

    GEESE Alexandra

    VAN SPARRENTAK Kim

    The Left (2)

    ARVANITIS Konstantinos

    DELLA VALLE Danilo

    ESN (1)

    ANDERSON Christine

    NI (1)

    PANAYIOTOU Fidias

    CS02 HOUS

    [ 20/01/2025 – ]

    Специална комисия относно жилищната криза в Европейския съюз

    Comisión Especial sobre la Crisis de la Vivienda en la Unión Europea

    Zvláštní výbor pro krizi v oblasti bydlení v Evropské unii

    Det Særlige Udvalg om Boligkrisen i Den Europæiske Union

    Sonderausschuss zur Wohnraumkrise in der Europäischen Union

    Euroopa Liidu eluasemekriisi erikomisjon

    Ειδική Επιτροπή για τη στεγαστική κρίση στην Ευρωπαϊκή Ένωση

    Special committee on the Housing Crisis in the European Union

    Commission spéciale sur la crise du logement dans l’Union européenne

    An Coiste Speisialta um an nGéarchéim Tithíochta san Aontas Eorpach

    Posebni odbor za stambenu krizu u Europskoj uniji

    Commissione speciale sulla crisi degli alloggi nell’Unione europea

    Īpašā komiteja mājokļu krīzes risināšanai Eiropas Savienībā

    Specialusis komitetas būsto krizės Europos Sąjungoje klausimais

    Az Európai Unióban tapasztalható lakhatási válsággal foglalkozó különbizottság

    Kumitat Speċjali dwar il-Kriżi tal-Akkomodazzjoni fl-Unjoni Ewropea

    Bijzondere Commissie inzake de huisvestingscrisis in de Europese Unie

    Komisja Specjalna ds. Kryzysu Mieszkaniowego w Unii Europejskiej

    Comissão Especial sobre a Crise de Habitação na União Europeia

    Comisia specială pentru criza locuințelor în Uniunea Europeană

    Osobitný výbor pre krízu bývania v Európskej únii

    Posebni odbor za stanovanjsko krizo v Evropski uniji

    Asuntokriisiä Euroopan unionissa käsittelevä erityisvaliokunta

    Särskilda utskottet för bostadskrisen i Europeiska unionen

    (33 members)

    PPE (9)

    BUGALHO Sebastião

    CASA David

    DOHERTY Regina

    EZCURRA ALMANSA Alma

    FALCONE Marco

    FERBER Markus

    GOTINK Dirk

    LE CALLENNEC Isabelle

    MARCZUŁAJTIS-WALCZAK Jagna

    S&D (6)

    BISCHOFF Gabriele

    GOMES Isilda

    HOMS GINEL Alicia

    MEBAREK Nora

    SCHIEDER Andreas

    TINAGLI Irene

    PfE (4)

    BLOM Rachel

    DOSTALOVA Klara

    HÖLVÉNYI György

    RECHAGNEUX Julie

    ECR (4)

    JUNCO GARCÍA Nora

    MAGONI Lara

    SBERNA Antonella

    TEODORESCU Georgiana

    Renew (4)

    HOJSÍK Martin

    MULLOOLY Ciaran

    TOOM Jana

    VAN DEN BERG Brigitte

    Verts/ALE (2)

    MARZÀ IBÁÑEZ Vicent

    OHISALO Maria

    The Left (2)

    CHAIBI Leila

    MONTERO Irene

    ESN (1)

    BOSSDORF Irmhild

    NI (1)

    ZACHARIA Maria

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    January 25, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Statement on the approval of the accounts at the Audit and Governance Committee on Wednesday 22 January

    Source: St Albans City and District

    Publication date: 24 Jan 2025

    Councillor Paul de Kort, Leader of St Albans City and District Council, said:

    I am pleased that the Council’s Statements of Accounts for three previous financial years have been approved by the Audit Committee.

    This brings to an end what has been a frustrating period for us and dozens of other local authorities across the country.

    We have complied with all laws and regulations governing our financial activities and there is nothing untoward in the accounts, which have been open to public inspection.

    Unfortunately, the delays in auditing the accounts – which were out of our control – have led to some unfair criticism and speculation that can now be put to rest.

    We will move forward, look to the future and concentrate on finalising our accounts for the last financial year, 2023/24, with the way clear for them to be audited in a timely fashion.

    Jonathan Flowers, the independent Chair of the Council’s Audit and Governance Committee, said: 

    As the Council’s external auditor BDO’s report explains, delays to the auditing of local authority accounts have been a national problem due to factors which councils have been powerless to prevent.

    These range from significant staff shortages among BDO and other auditors, who have had difficulty in recruiting and retaining staff, to the adverse impact upon their work of the Covid-19 pandemic.

    The Government recognised councils were experiencing lengthy delays through no fault of their own and introduced legislation last year which allowed them to clear the backlog and start afresh.

    Auditors are now required to issue a disclaimed opinion on accounts which the backlog pressures mean they have been unable to check.

    More than 300 disclaimed opinions have been made by auditors for local authority accounts across the country. It offers no opinion rather than an approval or a non-approval and attaches no blame. 

    It is a mechanism the Government is using to reset the local audit assurance process and allow for a fresh start.

    This means that the Audit and Governance Committee have had to look to other sources of assurance in relation to our accounts such as the work of our internal audit service.

    We look forward to putting the backlog behind us, though it will be some time before any of the affected councils can get fully approved accounts because of the overhang from this issue.

    Cllr de Kort added: 

    A disclaimed opinion is what BDO have made for our accounts for the financial years, 2021/22 and 2022/23.

    For the financial year 2020/21, they have issued a modified opinion. The audit commenced for that financial year but was not completed.

    Some issues were identified during the audit but were not resolved within the time constraints. 

    These are of a technical nature, such as the method used to value land and buildings, and we don’t necessarily accept the points BDO have raised. It is a matter of judgement, and we will simply agree to disagree. 

    The important thing is that we can now put these frustrating delays behind us and with the Committee having approved the accounts, we can move on to complete our accounts for 2023/24 with the help of our new auditors, KPMG.

    Notes:

    BDO’s Audit Completion Report – Extract from the Executive Summary:

    Circumstances that affect the form and content of the auditor’s report

    There has been a deterioration in the timeliness of local audit in recent years leading to a persistent and significant backlog of audit opinions. 

    Across England, the backlog of outstanding audit opinions stood at 771 at 31 December 2023 and is estimated to increase to around 1,000 later this year. 

    In February 2024, the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities published ‘Local audit delays: Joint statement on update to proposals to clear the backlog and embed timely audit’. 

    This joint statement confirmed that: “The issues facing local audit are widely recognised as multi-faceted and complex with no single cause or solution”. 

    The factors contributing to the delay in issuing an audit opinion on the financial statements of St Albans City & District Council for the year ended 31 March 2021 include, but are not limited to:

    § increased regulator expectations on auditors

    § difficulties in attracting, developing and retaining staff to perform local audit work 

    § the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic 

    Over the last year, organisations involved in the regulation and oversight of local body financial reporting and audit have been working collectively to agree a proposed solution to clear the outstanding historical audit opinions and ensure that delays do not return.

    MIL OSI United Kingdom –

    January 25, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Emotions and the law under the spotlight in new research project Understanding where emotions have received legal attention and the reasons behind it is the focus of a new research project involving the School of Law.

    Source: University of Aberdeen

    Photo credit: Katrin BolovstovaUnderstanding where emotions have received legal attention and the reasons behind it is the focus of a new research project involving the School of Law.
    ‘A History of Hurt Feelings and the Law’ will explore when, why and in what contexts people have sought legal redress for injured feelings from the 1750s through to the modern day.
    The four-year study will focus on Scotland, a small jurisdiction with a long and rich history of compensating for hurt feelings. It will combine approaches from law, history of emotions, medical history and legal history, charting how injured feelings have been identified, defined and addressed by courts.
    Dr Alice Krzanich, along with lead investigator Professor Chloë Kennedy at the University of Edinburgh and Professor Katie Barclay from Macquarie University, Australia, will work on the project following a £372,000 funding grant from the Leverhulme Trust.
    The project will explore how socially and culturally-informed ideas of selfhood, wellbeing, dignity and respect have shaped legal processes and examine how class, race and gender have affected litigation and legal decision making.
    “I am hugely excited to be undertaking this project”, says Dr Krzanich. “In law, we often focus on pecuniary remedies and the financial cost of illegal or offensive behaviour. This project though is a chance to consider how the law responds – both now and historically – to more intangible harm in the form of grief, stress, heartbreak, fright or anger. It will thus make an important contribution to the rich and ever evolving field of law and emotions.”
    The project will start in May this year and the team will include a Post-doctoral Research Fellow.

    MIL OSI United Kingdom –

    January 25, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Russia: The digital platform CML-Bench of St. Petersburg Polytechnic University is certified for working with commercial secrets

    Translartion. Region: Russians Fedetion –

    Source: Peter the Great St Petersburg Polytechnic University – Peter the Great St Petersburg Polytechnic University –

    The digital platform for the development and application of digital twins CML-Bench®, developed by Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, has received a certificate of compliance with the software security requirements of the Federal Service for Technical and Export Control (FSTEC of Russia) at the sixth level of trust. CML-Bench® is the first digital platform developed by SPbPU to receive a certificate allowing the processing of information with the confidentiality modes “Commercial Secret” and “For Official Use Only”.

    The sixth level of trust allows the platform to be used at significant critical information infrastructure facilities of the third category, in government information systems and as part of automated production and technological process control systems of the third class* of information security, and personal data information systems of the third level** of security.

    *In state information systems, there are three classes of information security, which are determined depending on the level of significance of the information processed in the information system and its scale (federal, regional, facility-based). The first class requires the greatest protection, the third class – the least protection. **When protecting personal data, the third level is the average level of security, which is used for personal data, the leakage of which may harm the data subject, but will not lead to significant risks.

    Thus, in the context of changing legislation in the field of import substitution of software and increasing requirements for software security, the FSTEC of Russia certificate allows using the CML-Bench® digital platform for working with government agencies; government institutions and enterprises; Russian legal entities that own information systems, information and telecommunications networks, automated control systems operating in the field of healthcare, science, transport, communications, energy, as well as state registration of rights to real estate and transactions with it, banking and other areas of the financial market, fuel and energy complex, in the field of nuclear energy, defense, rocket and space, mining, metallurgy and chemical industries.

    To ensure that the CML-Bench® digital platform meets the requirements of the sixth level of trust, specialists from the Advanced Engineering School of SPbPU “Digital Engineering” have developed and implemented a number of microservices in the software that provide protection against unauthorized access to information, implement identification and authentication functions, access control and registration of security events, in accordance with the requirements specified in the document “Information security requirements establishing levels of trust in technical information protection tools and information technology security tools”.

    In particular, authentication services, user rights management, and an LDAP (LDAP) interaction service were implemented. CML-Bench® was also integrated with Keycloak (a program that helps users log into different sites and applications under one account and allows you to manage who has access to what) with CML-Bench®. At the same time, identifiers and object types were output to the log by security event types with the ability to customize the volume of recorded information. Event logging was implemented for all account types. The Circuit Breaker template was successfully implemented and support for CSRF tokens (a security tool in web applications) was added. Healthcheck checks were also added to the new services.

    In March 2023, for the first time in the history of SPbPU, a license was received from the FSTEC of Russia for the development and production of means of protecting confidential information, including software tools for information protection; secure software (software and hardware) means of information processing and software (software and hardware) means of monitoring information security. After that, active work began on the allocation and refinement of the “security module” as part of the Digital Platform for the Development and Application of Digital Twins CML-Bench®. And a year and a half later, an FSTEC certificate was received confirming the compliance of the platform’s security level with the sixth trust level. For us, this is a very important result, since the structural divisions of the Advanced Engineering School of SPbPU “Digital Engineering” implement projects with high-tech companies from various industries that are subjects of critical information infrastructure, – commented Vice-Rector for Digital Transformation of SPbPU, Head of the Advanced Engineering School of SPbPU “Digital Engineering” Alexey Borovkov.

    The refinement of the “security module” as part of the Digital Platform for the Development and Application of Digital Twins CML-Bench® was accompanied by updating the technical documentation and testing.

    Certification tests on a special stand were carried out by the Scientific, Technical and Certification Center for Comprehensive Information Security (JSC Center Atomzashchitainform). As a result of the preparation of the research stand, along with the creation of conditions for testing, the absence of configuration vulnerabilities and signs of malware in the object of assessment, as well as potentially dangerous functional capabilities that appear during the installation and configuration of the object of assessment were checked. As a result, the CML-Bench® digital platform, based on the test results, confirmed the absence of current vulnerabilities and protection against the threat of unauthorized access to information contained in the product; against the threat of unauthorized transfer of information to information and telecommunication networks and other information systems; against the threat of unauthorized receipt of information about the product, as well as its nodes; the threat of denial of service.

    The assessment of the certification test materials for compliance with information security requirements was carried out by the expert commission of the certification body FSTEC of Russia. Based on the expert opinion on the results of comprehensive certification tests of the digital platform for the development and use of digital twins CML-Bench®, a certificate of compliance with information security requirements was issued.

    The certification was carried out on an initiative basis during the implementation of a project to design and create an automated digital engineering system jointly with Greenatom JSC in a subsidiary of TVEL JSC — CentroTech-Engineering LLC for further replication in the structures of TVEL JSC and Rosatom State Corporation.

    For reference:

    The CML-Bench® digital platform is a digital platform for the development and application of digital twins of both high-tech industrial products and goods, as well as technological and production processes for their manufacture, a system for managing activities in the field of system digital engineering. Since 2006, the CML-Bench® digital platform has been developed by employees of the Engineering Center (CompMechLab®) “Computer Engineering Center” of SPbPU and employees of the Computational Mechanics Laboratory LLC (CompMechLab®).

    The CML-Bench® Digital Platform is used to develop projects for high-tech industries: engine building, power engineering, nuclear, oil and gas, special and railway engineering, aircraft and helicopter engineering, including unmanned aerial vehicles, automotive engineering, including electric transport, shipbuilding and shipbuilding, as well as marine engineering, nuclear energy, fuel and energy complex, medicine, high-performance sports, etc.

    At the end of 2022, the CML-Bench® platform was deployed on the servers of Centrotech-Engineering LLC (part of the control circuit of the TVEL fuel company of the Rosatom State Corporation) as part of the project to create an automated digital engineering system. And in 2023, specialists from the Advanced Engineering School “Digital Engineering” of SPbPU developed a software module that allows for the seamless transfer of engineering data from one of the most popular PLM systems (engineering data and production process management systems) Teamcenter by Siemens to the CML-Bench® digital platform. The CML-Bench® digital platform formed the basis for the URANIA data and process management system for computational and experimental scientific research, used at the enterprises of the Rosatom State Corporation.

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    MIL OSI Russia News –

    January 25, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: Union Minister of Housing & Urban Affairs, Government of India inaugurated projects developed by Karimnagar Smart City

    Source: Government of India

    Union Minister of Housing & Urban Affairs, Government of India inaugurated projects developed by Karimnagar Smart City

    Karimnagar Smart City is implementing 50 projects worth ₹ 1,117 cr, out of which they have already completed 36 projects worth ₹ 233 cr.

    53 Smart Classrooms developed in the govt schools in Karimnagar, social infrastructure for students developed in 23 govt schools.

    Over 1 lakh metric tons of legacy waste processed under the Karimnagar Smart City

    Posted On: 24 JAN 2025 4:28PM by PIB Delhi

    Union Minister of Housing & Urban Affairs visited Karimnagar Smart City on 24th January and inaugurated 4 prominent projects working in the sector of education, solid waste management and social infrastructure.

    Projects Inaugurated by Hon’ble Minister

    • Development of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Stadium: This ₹22 crore project includes a commercial complex, renovation of the indoor hall, modern toilets, parking area, and landscaping, providing an inclusive space for recreation and sports.
    • Multi-purpose School Park: Spread over 5.96 acres, this ₹12.35 crore park has a walking track, musical fountain, and recreational facilities, providing a vibrant public space for families.
    • 24×7 Water Supply: This ₹18 crore initiative has introduced a new water distribution network in the Housing Board Colony, increasing efficiency and accessibility in water management for residents.
    • Social Infrastructure in Schools and smart classrooms in govt schools: Renovations carried out at a cost of ₹9.20 crore, such as construction of toilet blocks, compound walls, borewells, and sports facilities, ensure a better learning environment for students in 27 govt schools. Also, smart classrooms developed in 53 govt schools in Karimnagar to enhance the learning methodology in the city.

    Karimnagar Smart City has implemented 50 projects worth ₹1,117 crore. Of these, 36 projects worth ₹884 crore have been completed, and 14 projects worth ₹233 crore are under implementation. These initiatives contribute to key areas such as smart mobility, water supply, sanitation, and social infrastructure. These projects from Karimnagar Smart City are multi-sectoral projects working towards enhancing the ease of living for the citizens. Under the mission, various multi-sectoral projects were developed such as projects worth ₹ 480 cr in Smart Mobility, ₹ 402 cr in Water Supply and Sanitation, etc.

    Smart classrooms have been developed in 53 government schools, and improved infrastructure and sports facilities have been provided in 27 schools. These efforts ensure a modern learning environment for students and empower them with e-learning tools. Over 1 lakh metric tons of legacy waste has been processed under the bio-mining project, reflecting the city’s commitment to environmental sustainability. Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Stadium has been transformed into a world-class sports facility, with structures including cycle tracks, skating rinks, basketball courts and parking areas, among others.

    Many officials from the Smart City and the Director, MoHUA was also present during the inauguration.

    Launched in 2015 Smart Cities Mission aims to enhance the ease of living in our 100 cities and strengthen our economy through ease of doing business. These projects will play an important role in the sustainable development of our cities. These 100 smart cities are constantly making efforts to use technology for better urban management.

    ***

    JN/ SK

    (Release ID: 2095823) Visitor Counter : 49

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News –

    January 25, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Security: IAEA Work Central at World Economic Forum in Davos

    Source: International Atomic Energy Agency – IAEA

    “The work of the IAEA is at the centre of the debates. In particular, the nexus between nuclear energy and artificial intelligence has attracted a lot of attention,” the Director General said in Davos.  

    The IAEA held a session on nuclear’s role in meeting energy demands for artificial intelligence (AI), with experts from Bloomberg and technology venture capitalists DCVC. “Big tech needs nuclear to power energy-intensive AI data centres,” explained Mr Grossi.  

    A major event was also held on tripling nuclear energy, and the need for standardization, regulation, financing and collaboration in scaling up nuclear.  

    A few years ago, discussions might have been about phasing out nuclear energy.

    Today, at @wef #WEF25, we’re on “the road to tripling nuclear capacity”. This shows how nuclear is increasingly seen as essential for net-zero and energy transition.

    Watch ↓ https://t.co/P9oRXGX2Dg

    — Rafael MarianoGrossi (@rafaelmgrossi) January 21, 2025

    The Director General met with multiple world leaders to discuss development, energy and world peace, including Panama’s President Jose Raul Mulino, Israel’s President Isaac Herzog, Austria’s Chancellor Alexander Schallenberg and Flanders’ Minister-President Matthias Diependaele.  

    Mr Grossi and Mr Mulino engaged on the IAEA’s Atoms4Food programme, as well as improving cancer care with the IAEA’s Rays Of Hope programme. “The IAEA is proud to stand with Panama in building a healthier, more resilient future for its people,” the Director General said. 

    The IAEA’s work on health, food and nutrition was a focus of multiple high-level dialogues. For example, Mr Grossi met with Viet Nam’s Minister of Science and Technology Huynh Thanh Dat to discuss the drought-tolerant, high-yield rice varieties that were developed with IAEA support, and with the CEO of Anglo American, Duncan Wanblad, on progress on a joint research project to fight soil salinity and advance sustainable farming practices. 

    Another key topic for the week was international security, particularly the IAEA’s role in ensuring nonproliferation worldwide. 

    The Director General was a speaker at the World Economic Forum’s Rubik’s Cube of Global Security, where he addressed pressures on nonproliferation amid rising geostrategic tensions, alongside Finland’s President Alexander Stubb, Libya’s Prime Minister Abdulhamid AlDabaiba, the International Crisis Group, Comfort Ero, Harvard Kennedy School’s Meghan O’Sullivan, and Foreign Affairs Magazine’s Dan Kurtz-Phelan. 

    Addressed pressures on nonproliferation amid rising geostrategic tensions at @wef #WEF25 Rubik’s Cube of Global Security. In today’s complex geopolitical landscape, the nonproliferation regime remains indispensable and, despite challenges, it has served the global community well. pic.twitter.com/58oDiyHuTv

    — Rafael MarianoGrossi (@rafaelmgrossi) January 22, 2025

    Watch the recording of the session here.  

    The Director General was also active in closed sessions on artificial intelligence and sustainable energy in Latin America with leaders of the region, as well as an event on growing the African economy with leaders from the continent. 

    “The mission and the importance of the IAEA continue to grow. This is why we are here in Davos,” concluded the Director General. 

    MIL Security OSI –

    January 25, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: B2TRADER 2.2: C-Book Routing, Custom Markups, and Improved Mobile Trading

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    DUBAI, United Arab Emirates, Jan. 24, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — B2BROKER has rolled out a major update for B2TRADER, its multi-asset and multi-market trading platform. The latest version, B2TRADER 2.2, introduces key improvements that enhance order execution, risk management, and trading flexibility.
    This update includes the new C-Book order routing system, customisable markups, and the ability to connect multiple liquidity providers for a single asset type. Additionally, traders now have access to upgraded mobile apps for iOS and Android, ensuring a seamless experience across all devices.

    C-Book: More Control Over Order Execution

    B2TRADER 2.2 introduces C-Book, a new execution model that works alongside A-Book and B-Book. With this feature, brokers can decide how each order is handled—whether routed externally to liquidity providers or processed internally through B-Book.

    A new reporting system in the admin panel gives brokers complete transparency over executed orders, helping them manage risks more effectively. The C-Book model also helps reduce trading costs by optimising the use of liquidity providers.

    Custom Markups for Flexible Pricing

    With the latest update, brokers gain greater control over pricing strategies. B2TRADER 2.2 allows them to apply commissions, markups, or both, tailored to different trading conditions and client needs.

    Brokers can also create customised price streams, granting specific traders or groups access to different market conditions. This flexibility makes it easier to offer competitive and personalised trading options.

    Better Risk Management with Multiple Liquidity Providers

    Now, brokers can integrate multiple liquidity providers within B2TRADER, ensuring more stable and competitive trading conditions.

    Using multiple providers improves market depth, speeds up order execution, and minimises risks associated with reliance on a single provider. If one provider experiences issues, the platform automatically routes orders through another, ensuring uninterrupted trading.

    New Trading Tools: Take Profit, Stop Loss & Trailing Stops

    B2TRADER 2.2 introduces essential risk management tools that give traders more control over their positions. The update includes:

    • Take Profit: Automatically closes a position when a profit target is reached.
    • Stop Loss: Helps limit losses by closing a position at a predefined level.
    • Trailing Stop: Adjusts the stop level dynamically as the market moves in the trader’s favour.

    These tools allow traders to execute strategies more effectively, even when they’re not actively monitoring the markets.

    “At B2BROKER, we aim to stay ahead of the curve and empower brokers with innovative solutions that align with the rapidly evolving market needs. With B2TRADER 2.2, we remain committed to enabling our clients to thrive in a competitive environment while reflecting where the market is headed—towards greater customisation, advanced risk management, and unparalleled accessibility.

    We are proud to continue driving innovation that helps our clients succeed in an increasingly complex trading environment.”

    Mark Speare, Chief Client Officer at B2BROKER

    Enhanced Mobile Trading on iOS & Android

    Mobile trading has been significantly improved with the latest update. The upgraded apps for iOS and Android provide a full-featured trading experience, ensuring traders can access their accounts, monitor positions, and place orders easily from anywhere.

    Among the key features of the updated B2TRADER mobile app are:

    • User-Friendly Interface: The app mirrors the desktop experience, making trading on mobile simple and intuitive.
    • Access Anytime, Anywhere: Traders can manage their portfolios on the go without any limitations.
    • All-in-One Trading Platform: The mobile app supports complex order types, real-time chart analysis, and performance tracking.

    What’s Next for B2TRADER?

    B2BROKER continues to improve its multi-asset and multi-market trading platform with new features and enhancements. With B2TRADER 2.2, brokers and traders can take advantage of smarter execution models, flexible pricing strategies, and a seamless mobile trading experience.

    In the near future, the platform will introduce support for perpetual futures trading, expanding its already robust offerings, which include CRYPTO SPOT, Forex, and CFDs.

    Contact Details:

    Ketevan Julukhadze
    mail@b2broker.net

    Disclaimer: This content is provided by “B2BROKER”. The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the content provider. The information provided in this press release is not a solicitation for investment, nor is it intended as investment advice, financial advice, or trading advice. It is strongly recommended you practice due diligence, including consultation with a professional financial advisor, before investing in or trading cryptocurrency and securities. Please conduct your own research and invest at your own risk.

    Photos accompanying this announcement are available at:

    https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/d2e93a41-e30f-4b05-9257-60cebf01ed6b

    https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/761fd664-5a11-4fc2-9963-7c1ea24fafd1

    https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/228625b6-fcf5-433d-a5a5-c7bf49a8dae6

    https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/662971f7-d125-48c9-98d1-ff3b4738542e

    https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/a380ff8d-5090-46e9-812f-0c0ef270c1bc

    https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/7ef8ed23-7751-4b3e-91f7-e93b93da8caf

    The MIL Network –

    January 25, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Russia: Financial news: Three deposit auctions of UK FRT LLC will take place on 24.01.2025

    Translartion. Region: Russians Fedetion –

    Source: Moscow Exchange – Moscow Exchange –

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    Please note; This information is raw content directly from the information source. It is accurate to what the source is stating and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    https://www.moex.com/n77105

    Categoris24-7, Miles, Moscow, Moscow Stotsk Exchang, Russians Savings, Russian Federation, Russians Language, Russian economy

    Post navigation

    Previous PostPrevious Financial news: 01/24/2025, 10:21 (Moscow time) the values of the upper limit of the price corridor and the range of market risk assessment for the security RU000A105DN0 (FSK RS BO6) were changed.
    Next PostNext About 6.5 thousand students completed internships at Rosneft enterprises in 2024

    Archives

    Archives Police Privces Proudly would trust WordPress

    Date of the deposit auction 01/24/2025
    Placement currency Rub
    Maximum amount of funds placed (in placement currency) 2,547,000,000.00
    Placement period, days 32
    Date of deposit 01/24/2025
    Refund date 02/25/2025
    Minimum placement interest rate, % per annum 21.00
    Conditions of imprisonment, urgent or special Urgent
    Minimum amount of funds placed for one application (in placement currency) 2,547,000,000.00
    Maximum number of applications from one Participant, pcs. 1
    Auction form, open or closed Open
    Basis of the Treaty General Agreement
     
    Schedule (Moscow time)
    Preliminary applications from 12:00 to 12:10
    Applications in competition mode from 12:10 to 12:15
    Setting a cut-off percentage or declaring the auction invalid until 12:25
       
    Additional terms  

    MIL OSI Russia News –

    January 25, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Russia: “Close Technologies”: HSE exhibition on digital sensorics at Tula Machine Tool Museum

    Translation. Region: Russian Federation –

    Source: State University Higher School of Economics – State University Higher School of Economics –

    Today’s event industry, as a vector of the experience economy, combines design, theater, cinema, performance, music, food, health, tourism and other areas of human life. Professional design of art and lifestyle events is the main trend of the future, and an experience engineer is perhaps the main creative profession of our tomorrow, in which an event will be understood as designing and obtaining a new experience, and not a service, regardless of the scale and format of the event.

    The profile “Event. Theatre. Performance” trains professionals in the field of the experience industry at the intersection of directing, scenography, work with space, light, video, body, costume, make-up and performative practices in all their semantic, conceptual and artistic connections.

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    MIL OSI Russia News –

    January 25, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: South Plains Financial, Inc. Reports Fourth Quarter and Year-End 2024 Financial Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    LUBBOCK, Texas, Jan. 24, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — South Plains Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ:SPFI) (“South Plains” or the “Company”), the parent company of City Bank (“City Bank” or the “Bank”), today reported its financial results for the quarter and year ended December 31, 2024.

    Fourth Quarter 2024 Highlights

    • Net income for the fourth quarter of 2024 was $16.5 million, compared to $11.2 million for the third quarter of 2024 and $10.3 million for the fourth quarter of 2023.
    • Diluted earnings per share for the fourth quarter of 2024 was $0.96, compared to $0.66 for the third quarter of 2024 and $0.61 for the fourth quarter of 2023.
    • Average cost of deposits for the fourth quarter of 2024 was 229 basis points, compared to 247 basis points for the third quarter of 2024 and 224 basis points for the fourth quarter of 2023.
    • Net interest margin, calculated on a tax-equivalent basis, was 3.75% for the fourth quarter of 2024, compared to 3.65% for the third quarter of 2024 and 3.52% for the fourth quarter of 2023.
    • Return on average assets for the fourth quarter of 2024 was 1.53% annualized, compared to 1.05% annualized for the third quarter of 2024 and 0.99% annualized for the fourth quarter of 2023.
    • Tangible book value (non-GAAP) per share was $25.40 as of December 31, 2024, compared to $25.75 as of September 30, 2024 and $23.47 as of December 31, 2023.
    • The consolidated total risk-based capital ratio, common equity tier 1 risk-based capital ratio, and tier 1 leverage ratio at December 31, 2023 were 16.74%, 12.41%, and 11.33%, respectively. These ratios significantly exceeded the minimum regulatory levels necessary to be deemed “well-capitalized”.

    Full Year 2024 Highlights

    • Full year net income of $49.7 million in 2024, compared to $62.7 million in 2023.
    • Diluted earnings per share of $2.92 in 2024, compared to $3.62 in 2023.
    • The Bank’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Windmark Insurance Agency, Inc. (“Windmark”), was sold in the second quarter of 2023 for $36.1 million, resulting in a gain, net of related charges and taxes, of $22.9 million or $1.32 of diluted earnings per share.
    • Loans held for investment grew $40.9 million, or 1.4%, during 2024.
    • Total assets were $4.23 billion at December 31, 2024, compared to $4.20 billion at December 31, 2023.
    • Return on average assets of 1.17% for the full year 2024, compared to 1.54% for 2023.

    Curtis Griffith, South Plains’ Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, commented, “I am very proud of our performance this past year as we successfully navigated a challenging environment with a focus on delivering strong financial results. We tightly managed our liquidity to optimize our profitability and return metrics while maintaining our conservative approach to underwriting and risk management. We have also managed the anticipated decline in our indirect auto portfolio as well as a heightened level of loan payoffs and paydowns that has obscured the strong, underlying loan production that has built through the year. Importantly, we are seeing a growing level of optimism across our customer base that is translating into the strongest new business production pipeline that we have seen in more than two years. This bodes positively for the year ahead where we expect to deliver low to mid-single digit loan growth for the full year 2025. Additionally, we are seeing deposit pricing fall across our markets which contributed to our strong margin expansion in the fourth quarter.”

    Results of Operations, Quarter Ended December 31, 2024

    Net Interest Income

    Net interest income was $38.5 million for the fourth quarter of 2024, compared to $37.3 million for the third quarter of 2024 and $35.2 million for the fourth quarter of 2023. Net interest margin, calculated on a tax-equivalent basis, was 3.75% for the fourth quarter of 2024, compared to 3.65% for the third quarter of 2024 and 3.52% for the fourth quarter of 2023. The average yield on loans was 6.69% for the fourth quarter of 2024, compared to 6.68% for the third quarter of 2024 and 6.29% for the fourth quarter of 2023. The average cost of deposits was 229 basis points for the fourth quarter of 2024, which is 18 basis points lower than the third quarter of 2024 and 5 basis points higher than the fourth quarter of 2023.

    Interest income was $61.3 million for the fourth quarter of 2024, compared to $61.6 million for the third quarter of 2024 and $57.2 million for the fourth quarter of 2023. Interest income decreased $316 thousand in the fourth quarter of 2024 from the third quarter of 2024, which was primarily comprised of a decrease of $243 thousand in loan interest income. The decline in loan interest income was due primarily to a decrease in average loans of $20.2 million. Interest income increased $4.1 million in the fourth quarter of 2024 compared to the fourth quarter of 2023. This increase was primarily due to an increase of average loans of $30.5 million and higher loan interest rates during the period, resulting in growth of $3.4 million in loan interest income.

    Interest expense was $22.8 million for the fourth quarter of 2024, compared to $24.3 million for the third quarter of 2024 and $22.1 million for the fourth quarter of 2023. Interest expense decreased $1.6 million compared to the third quarter of 2024 and increased $702 thousand compared to the fourth quarter of 2023. The $1.6 million decrease was primarily as a result of a 24 basis point decline in the cost of interest-bearing deposits. The $702 thousand increase was primarily a result of growth in average interest-bearing deposits of $136.0 million.

    Noninterest Income and Noninterest Expense

    Noninterest income was $13.3 million for the fourth quarter of 2024, compared to $10.6 million for the third quarter of 2024 and $9.1 million for the fourth quarter of 2023. The increase from the third quarter of 2024 was primarily due to an increase of $3.1 million in mortgage banking revenues, mainly from an increase of $3.5 million in the fair value adjustment of the mortgage servicing rights assets as interest rates that affect the value increased in the fourth quarter of 2024. This growth was partially offset by approximately $700 thousand in insurance proceeds received for property damage in the third quarter of 2024. The increase in noninterest income for the fourth quarter of 2024 as compared to the fourth quarter of 2023 was primarily due to an increase of $3.3 million in mortgage banking activities revenue mainly from a rise of $3.0 million in the fair value adjustment of the mortgage servicing rights assets as interest rates that affect the value increased in the fourth quarter of 2024.

    Noninterest expense was $29.9 million for the fourth quarter of 2024, compared to $33.1 million for the third quarter of 2024 and $30.6 million for the fourth quarter of 2023. The $3.2 million decrease from the third quarter of 2024 was largely the result of a decline of $1.4 million in personnel expenses, primarily from decreased health insurance costs of $668 thousand, as annual rebates were received in the fourth quarter, and a reduction of $400 thousand in mortgage commissions as mortgage activity slowed in the fourth quarter. There were also decreases in net occupancy expense, professional service expenses, and the ineffectiveness related to fair value hedges on municipal securities. The decrease in noninterest expense for the fourth quarter of 2024 as compared to the fourth quarter of 2023 was largely the result of a decrease of $593 thousand in personnel expenses, related to the decline in health insurance costs previously noted.

    Loan Portfolio and Composition

    Loans held for investment were $3.06 billion as of December 31, 2024, compared to $3.04 billion as of September 30, 2024 and $3.01 billion as of December 31, 2023. The $17.7 million, or 2.3% annualized, increase during the fourth quarter of 2024 as compared to the third quarter of 2024 occurred primarily as a result of organic loan growth experienced in commercial owner-occupied real estate loans. As of December 31, 2024, loans held for investment increased $40.9 million, or 1.4%, from December 31, 2023, primarily attributable to organic loan growth, occurring mainly in multi-family property loans, direct-energy loans, commercial owner-occupied real estate loans, and single-family property loans, partially offset by decreases in consumer auto loans and construction, land, and development loans.

    Deposits and Borrowings

    Deposits totaled $3.62 billion as of December 31, 2024, compared to $3.72 billion as of September 30, 2024 and $3.63 billion as of December 31, 2023. Deposits decreased by $94.8 million, or 2.6%, in the fourth quarter of 2024 from September 30, 2024. As of December 31, 2024, deposits were essentially unchanged, from December 31, 2023. Noninterest-bearing deposits were $935.5 million as of December 31, 2024, compared to $998.5 million as of September 30, 2024 and $974.2 million as of December 31, 2023. Noninterest-bearing deposits represented 25.8% of total deposits as of December 31, 2024. The quarterly change in total deposits was mainly due to the seasonal decline in escrow accounts of approximately $35 million and a planned reduction of approximately $50 million in customer sweep deposits as part of balance sheet management. Deposits were essentially unchanged, year-over-year, with an increase in interest-bearing deposits offset by a decline in noninterest-bearing deposits.

    Asset Quality

    The Company recorded a provision for credit losses in the fourth quarter of 2024 of $1.2 million, compared to $495 thousand in the third quarter of 2024 and $600 thousand in the fourth quarter of 2023. The provision during the fourth quarter of 2024 was largely attributable to net charge-off activity and increased loan balances.

    The ratio of allowance for credit losses to loans held for investment was 1.42% as of December 31, 2024, compared to 1.41% as of September 30, 2024 and 1.41% as of December 31, 2023.

    The ratio of nonperforming assets to total assets was 0.58% as of December 31, 2024, compared to 0.59% as of September 30, 2024 and 0.14% as of December 31, 2023. Annualized net charge-offs were 0.11% for the fourth quarter of 2024, compared to 0.11% for the third quarter of 2024 and 0.08% for the fourth quarter of 2023.

    Capital

    Book value per share decreased to $26.67 at December 31, 2024, compared to $27.04 at September 30, 2024. The change was primarily driven by a decrease in accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”) of $18.2 million, partially offset by $14.0 million of net income after dividends paid. The decrease in AOCI was attributed to the after-tax decrease in fair value of our available for sale securities, net of fair value hedges, as a result of increases in long-term market interest rates during the period. The tangible common equity to tangible assets ratio (non-GAAP) increased 15 basis points to 9.92% in the fourth quarter of 2024.

    Conference Call

    South Plains will host a conference call to discuss its fourth quarter and year-end 2024 financial results today, January 24, 2025, at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Time. Investors and analysts interested in participating in the call are invited to dial 1-877-407-9716 (international callers please dial 1-201-493-6779) approximately 10 minutes prior to the start of the call. A live audio webcast of the conference call and conference materials will be available on the Company’s website at https://www.spfi.bank/news-events/events.

    A replay of the conference call will be available within two hours of the conclusion of the call and can be accessed on the investor section of the Company’s website as well as by dialing 1-844-512-2921 (international callers please dial 1-412-317-6671). The pin to access the telephone replay is 13750452. The replay will be available until February 7, 2025.

    About South Plains Financial, Inc.

    South Plains is the bank holding company for City Bank, a Texas state-chartered bank headquartered in Lubbock, Texas. City Bank is one of the largest independent banks in West Texas and has additional banking operations in the Dallas, El Paso, Greater Houston, the Permian Basin, and College Station, Texas markets, and the Ruidoso, New Mexico market. South Plains provides a wide range of commercial and consumer financial services to small and medium-sized businesses and individuals in its market areas. Its principal business activities include commercial and retail banking, along with investment, trust and mortgage services. Please visit https://www.spfi.bank for more information.

    Non-GAAP Financial Measures

    Some of the financial measures included in this press release are not measures of financial performance recognized in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”). These non-GAAP financial measures include Tangible Book Value Per Share, Tangible Common Equity to Tangible Assets, and Pre-Tax, Pre-Provision Income. The Company believes these non-GAAP financial measures provide both management and investors a more complete understanding of the Company’s financial position and performance. These non-GAAP financial measures are supplemental and are not a substitute for any analysis based on GAAP financial measures.

    We classify a financial measure as being a non-GAAP financial measure if that financial measure excludes or includes amounts, or is subject to adjustments that have the effect of excluding or including amounts, that are included or excluded, as the case may be, in the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP as in effect from time to time in the United States in our statements of income, balance sheets or statements of cash flows. Not all companies use the same calculation of these measures; therefore, this presentation may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures as presented by other companies.

    A reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures to GAAP financial measures is provided at the end of this press release.

    Available Information

    The Company routinely posts important information for investors on its web site (under http://www.spfi.bank and, more specifically, under the News & Events tab at http://www.spfi.bank/news-events/press-releases). The Company intends to use its web site as a means of disclosing material non-public information and for complying with its disclosure obligations under Regulation FD (Fair Disclosure) promulgated by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Accordingly, investors should monitor the Company’s web site, in addition to following the Company’s press releases, SEC filings, public conference calls, presentations and webcasts.

    The information contained on, or that may be accessed through, the Company’s web site is not incorporated by reference into, and is not a part of, this document.

    Forward Looking Statements

    This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements reflect South Plains’ current views with respect to future events and South Plains’ financial performance. Any statements about South Plains’ expectations, beliefs, plans, predictions, forecasts, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance are not historical facts and may be forward-looking. These statements are often, but not always, made through the use of words or phrases such as “anticipate,” “believes,” “can,” “could,” “may,” “predicts,” “potential,” “should,” “will,” “estimate,” “plans,” “projects,” “continuing,” “ongoing,” “expects,” “intends” and similar words or phrases. South Plains cautions that the forward-looking statements in this press release are based largely on South Plains’ expectations and are subject to a number of known and unknown risks and uncertainties that are subject to change based on factors which are, in many instances, beyond South Plains’ control. Factors that could cause such changes include, but are not limited to, the impact on us and our customers of a decline in general economic conditions and any regulatory responses thereto; potential recession in the United States and our market areas; the impacts related to or resulting from uncertainty in the banking industry as a whole; increased competition for deposits in our market areas and related changes in deposit customer behavior; the impact of changes in market interest rates, whether due to a continuation of the elevated interest rate environment or further reductions in interest rates and a resulting decline in net interest income; the lingering inflationary pressures, and the risk of the resurgence of elevated levels of inflation, in the United States and our market areas; the uncertain impacts of ongoing quantitative tightening and current and future monetary policies of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System; increases in unemployment rates in the United States and our market areas; declines in commercial real estate values and prices; uncertainty regarding United States fiscal debt, deficit and budget matters; cyber incidents or other failures, disruptions or breaches of our operational or security systems or infrastructure, or those of our third-party vendors or other service providers, including as a result of cyber attacks; severe weather, natural disasters, acts of war or terrorism, geopolitical instability or other external events; the impact of changes in U.S. presidential administrations or Congress, including potential changes in U.S. and international trade policies and the resulting impact on the Company and its customers; competition and market expansion opportunities; changes in non-interest expenditures or in the anticipated benefits of such expenditures; the risks related to the development, implementation, use and management of emerging technologies, including artificial intelligence and machine learnings; potential costs related to the impacts of climate change; current or future litigation, regulatory examinations or other legal and/or regulatory actions; and changes in applicable laws and regulations. Additional information regarding these risks and uncertainties to which South Plains’ business and future financial performance are subject is contained in South Plains’ most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K and Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q on file with the SEC, including the sections entitled “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of such documents, and other documents South Plains files or furnishes with the SEC from time to time, which are available on the SEC’s website, http://www.sec.gov. Actual results, performance or achievements could differ materially from those contemplated, expressed, or implied by the forward-looking statements due to additional risks and uncertainties of which South Plains is not currently aware or which it does not currently view as, but in the future may become, material to its business or operating results. Due to these and other possible uncertainties and risks, the Company can give no assurance that the results contemplated in the forward-looking statements will be realized and readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements contained in this press release. Any forward-looking statements presented herein are made only as of the date of this press release, and South Plains does not undertake any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements to reflect changes in assumptions, new information, the occurrence of unanticipated events, or otherwise, except as required by applicable law. All forward-looking statements, express or implied, included in the press release are qualified in their entirety by this cautionary statement.

    Contact: Mikella Newsom, Chief Risk Officer and Secretary
      (866) 771-3347
      investors@city.bank
       

    Source: South Plains Financial, Inc.

     
    South Plains Financial, Inc.
    Consolidated Financial Highlights – (Unaudited)
    (Dollars in thousands, except share data)
     
      As of and for the quarter ended
      December 31,
    2024
      September 30,
    2024
      June 30,
    2024
      March 31,
    2024
      December 31,
    2023
    Selected Income Statement Data:                            
    Interest income $ 61,324     $ 61,640     $ 59,208     $ 58,727     $ 57,236  
    Interest expense   22,776       24,346       23,320       23,359       22,074  
    Net interest income   38,548       37,294       35,888       35,368       35,162  
    Provision for credit losses   1,200       495       1,775       830       600  
    Noninterest income   13,319       10,635       12,709       11,409       9,146  
    Noninterest expense   29,948       33,128       32,572       31,930       30,597  
    Income tax expense   4,222       3,094       3,116       3,143       2,787  
    Net income   16,497       11,212       11,134       10,874       10,324  
    Per Share Data (Common Stock):                            
    Net earnings, basic $ 1.01     $ 0.68     $ 0.68     $ 0.66     $ 0.63  
    Net earnings, diluted   0.96       0.66       0.66       0.64       0.61  
    Cash dividends declared and paid   0.15       0.14       0.14       0.13       0.13  
    Book value   26.67       27.04       25.45       24.87       24.80  
    Tangible book value (non-GAAP)   25.40       25.75       24.15       23.56       23.47  
    Weighted average shares outstanding, basic   16,400,361       16,386,079       16,425,360       16,429,919       16,443,908  
    Weighted average shares outstanding, dilutive   17,161,646       17,056,959       16,932,077       16,938,857       17,008,892  
    Shares outstanding at end of period   16,455,826       16,386,627       16,424,021       16,431,755       16,417,099  
    Selected Period End Balance Sheet Data:                            
    Cash and cash equivalents $ 359,082     $ 471,167     $ 298,006     $ 371,939     $ 330,158  
    Investment securities   577,240       606,889       591,031       599,869       622,762  
    Total loans held for investment   3,055,054       3,037,375       3,094,273       3,011,799       3,014,153  
    Allowance for credit losses   43,237       42,886       43,173       42,174       42,356  
    Total assets   4,232,239       4,337,659       4,220,936       4,218,993       4,204,793  
    Interest-bearing deposits   2,685,366       2,720,880       2,672,948       2,664,397       2,651,952  
    Noninterest-bearing deposits   935,510       998,480       951,565       974,174       974,201  
    Total deposits   3,620,876       3,719,360       3,624,513       3,638,571       3,626,153  
    Borrowings   110,354       110,307       110,261       110,214       110,168  
    Total stockholders’ equity   438,949       443,122       417,985       408,712       407,114  
    Summary Performance Ratios:                            
    Return on average assets (annualized)   1.53 %     1.05 %     1.07 %     1.04 %     0.99 %
    Return on average equity (annualized)   14.88 %     10.36 %     10.83 %     10.72 %     10.52 %
    Net interest margin (1)   3.75 %     3.65 %     3.63 %     3.56 %     3.52 %
    Yield on loans   6.69 %     6.68 %     6.60 %     6.53 %     6.29 %
    Cost of interest-bearing deposits   3.12 %     3.36 %     3.33 %     3.27 %     3.14 %
    Efficiency ratio   57.50 %     68.80 %     66.72 %     67.94 %     68.71 %
    Summary Credit Quality Data:                            
    Nonperforming loans $ 24,023     $ 24,693     $ 23,452     $ 3,380     $ 5,178  
    Nonperforming loans to total loans held for investment   0.79 %     0.81 %     0.76 %     0.11 %     0.17 %
    Other real estate owned   530       973       755       862       912  
    Nonperforming assets to total assets   0.58 %     0.59 %     0.57 %     0.10 %     0.14 %
    Allowance for credit losses to total loans held for investment   1.42 %     1.41 %     1.40 %     1.40 %     1.41 %
    Net charge-offs to average loans outstanding (annualized)   0.11 %     0.11 %     0.10 %     0.13 %     0.08 %
                                           
      As of and for the quarter ended
      December 31
    2024
      September 30,
    2024
      June 30,
    2024
      March 31,
    2024
      December 31,
    2023
    Capital Ratios:                            
    Total stockholders’ equity to total assets   10.37 %     10.22 %     9.90 %     9.69 %     9.68 %
    Tangible common equity to tangible assets (non-GAAP)   9.92 %     9.77 %     9.44 %     9.22 %     9.21 %
    Common equity tier 1 to risk-weighted assets   13.53 %     13.25 %     12.61 %     12.67 %     12.41 %
    Tier 1 capital to average assets   12.04 %     11.76 %     11.81 %     11.51 %     11.33 %
    Total capital to risk-weighted assets   17.86 %     17.61 %     16.86 %     17.00 %     16.74 %
    (1) Net interest margin is calculated as the annual net interest income, on a fully tax-equivalent basis, divided by average interest-earning assets.
     
    South Plains Financial, Inc.
    Average Balances and Yields – (Unaudited)
    (Dollars in thousands)
     
      For the Three Months Ended
      December 31, 2024   December 31, 2023
           
      Average
    Balance
      Interest   Yield/Rate   Average
    Balance
      Interest   Yield/Rate
    Assets                                          
    Loans $ 3,049,718     $ 51,270       6.69 %   $ 3,019,228     $ 47,903       6.29 %
    Debt securities – taxable   518,646       4,994       3.83 %     560,143       5,563       3.94 %
    Debt securities – nontaxable   154,203       1,014       2.62 %     157,341       1,032       2.60 %
    Other interest-bearing assets   390,090       4,267       4.35 %     255,454       2,963       4.60 %
                                               
    Total interest-earning assets   4,112,657       61,545       5.95 %     3,992,166       57,461       5.71 %
    Noninterest-earning assets   189,422                     156,541                
                                               
    Total assets $ 4,302,079                   $ 4,148,707                
                                               
    Liabilities & stockholders’ equity                                          
    NOW, Savings, MMDA’s $ 2,249,062       16,570       2.93 %   $ 2,201,190       16,894       3.04 %
    Time deposits   445,173       4,566       4.08 %     357,067       3,325       3.69 %
    Short-term borrowings   3       –       0.00 %     3       –       0.00 %
    Notes payable & other long-term borrowings   –       –       0.00 %     –       –       0.00 %
    Subordinated debt   63,938       834       5.19 %     73,740       981       5.28 %
    Junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures   46,393       806       6.91 %     46,393       874       7.47 %
                                               
    Total interest-bearing liabilities   2,804,569       22,776       3.23 %     2,678,393       22,074       3.27 %
    Demand deposits   978,742                     1,021,091                
    Other liabilities   77,732                     59,808                
    Stockholders’ equity   441,036                     389,415                
                                               
    Total liabilities & stockholders’ equity $ 4,302,079                   $ 4,148,707                
                                               
    Net interest income         $ 38,769                   $ 35,387        
    Net interest margin (2)                   3.75 %                     3.52 %
    (1) Average loan balances include nonaccrual loans and loans held for sale.
    (2) Net interest margin is calculated as the annualized net interest income, on a fully tax-equivalent basis, divided by average interest-earning assets.
       
    South Plains Financial, Inc.
    Average Balances and Yields – (Unaudited)
    (Dollars in thousands)
     
      For the Twelve Months Ended
      December 31, 2024   December 31, 2023
                           
      Average
    Balance
      Interest   Yield/Rate   Average
    Balance
      Interest   Yield/Rate
    Assets                                          
    Loans $ 3,054,189     $ 202,301       6.62 %   $ 2,924,473     $ 176,627       6.04 %
    Debt securities – taxable   532,730       21,090       3.96 %     570,655       21,590       3.78 %
    Debt securities – nontaxable   155,168       4,076       2.63 %     185,205       4,901       2.65 %
    Other interest-bearing assets   312,917       14,319       4.58 %     223,152       9,973       4.47 %
                                               
    Total interest-earning assets   4,055,004       241,786       5.96 %     3,903,485       213,091       5.46 %
    Noninterest-earning assets   179,527                     176,495                
                                               
    Total assets $ 4,234,531                   $ 4,079,980                
                                               
    Liabilities & stockholders’ equity                                          
    NOW, Savings, MMDA’s $ 2,250,942       70,362       3.13 %   $ 2,117,985       55,423       2.62 %
    Time deposits   411,028       16,719       4.07 %     321,205       9,564       2.98 %
    Short-term borrowings   3       –       0.00 %     84       5       5.95 %
    Notes payable & other long-term borrowings   –       –       0.00 %     –       –       0.00 %
    Subordinated debt   63,868       3,339       5.23 %     75,458       4,018       5.32 %
    Junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures   46,393       3,381       7.29 %     46,393       3,276       7.06 %
                                               
    Total interest-bearing liabilities   2,772,234       93,801       3.38 %     2,561,125       72,286       2.82 %
    Demand deposits   968,307                     1,069,280                
    Other liabilities   70,777                     71,102                
    Stockholders’ equity   423,213                     378,473                
                                               
    Total liabilities & stockholders’ equity $ 4,234,531                   $ 4,079,980                
                                               
    Net interest income         $ 147,985                   $ 140,805        
    Net interest margin (2)                   3.65 %                     3.61 %
    (1) Average loan balances include nonaccrual loans and loans held for sale.
    (2) Net interest margin is calculated as the annualized net interest income, on a fully tax-equivalent basis, divided by average interest-earning assets.
       
    South Plains Financial, Inc.
    Consolidated Balance Sheets
    (Unaudited)
    (Dollars in thousands)
     
      As of
      December 31,
    2024
      December 31,
    2023
               
    Assets          
    Cash and due from banks $ 54,114     $ 62,821  
    Interest-bearing deposits in banks   304,968       267,337  
    Securities available for sale   577,240       622,762  
    Loans held for sale   20,542       14,499  
    Loans held for investment   3,055,054       3,014,153  
    Less:  Allowance for credit losses   (43,237 )     (42,356 )
    Net loans held for investment   3,011,817       2,971,797  
    Premises and equipment, net   52,951       55,070  
    Goodwill   19,315       19,315  
    Intangible assets   1,720       2,429  
    Mortgage servicing rights   26,292       26,569  
    Other assets   163,280       162,194  
    Total assets $ 4,232,239     $ 4,204,793  
               
    Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity          
    Noninterest-bearing deposits $ 935,510     $ 974,201  
    Interest-bearing deposits   2,685,366       2,651,952  
    Total deposits   3,620,876       3,626,153  
    Subordinated debt   63,961       63,775  
    Junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures   46,393       46,393  
    Other liabilities   62,060       61,358  
    Total liabilities   3,793,290       3,797,679  
    Stockholders’ Equity          
    Common stock   16,456       16,417  
    Additional paid-in capital   97,287       97,107  
    Retained earnings   385,827       345,264  
    Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)   (60,621 )     (51,674 )
    Total stockholders’ equity   438,949       407,114  
    Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $ 4,232,239     $ 4,204,793  
                   
    South Plains Financial, Inc.
    Consolidated Statements of Income
    (Unaudited)
    (Dollars in thousands)
     
      Three Months Ended   Twelve Months Ended
      December 31,
    2024
      December 31,
    2023
      December 31,
    2024
      December 31,
    2023
                                   
    Interest income:                              
    Loans, including fees $ 51,262     $ 47,895     $ 202,270     $ 176,598  
    Other   10,062       9,341       38,629       35,435  
    Total interest income   61,324       57,236       240,899       212,033  
    Interest expense:                              
    Deposits   21,136       20,219       87,081       64,987  
    Subordinated debt   834       981       3,339       4,018  
    Junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures   806       874       3,381       3,276  
    Other   –       –       –       5  
    Total interest expense   22,776       22,074       93,801       72,286  
    Net interest income   38,548       35,162       147,098       139,747  
    Provision for credit losses   1,200       600       4,300       4,610  
    Net interest income after provision for credit losses   37,348       34,562       142,798       135,137  
    Noninterest income:                              
    Service charges on deposits   2,241       1,844       8,026       7,130  
    Income from insurance activities   31       37       123       1,515  
    Mortgage banking activities   4,955       1,671       14,187       13,817  
    Bank card services and interchange fees   3,225       3,167       13,640       13,323  
    Gain on sale of subsidiary   —       —       —       33,778  
    Other   2,867       2,427       12,096       9,663  
    Total noninterest income   13,319       9,146       48,072       79,226  
    Noninterest expense:                              
    Salaries and employee benefits   17,384       17,977       74,338       79,377  
    Net occupancy expense   3,901       3,856       16,105       16,102  
    Professional services   1,555       1,509       6,583       6,433  
    Marketing and development   1,153       880       3,782       3,453  
    Other   5,955       6,375       26,770       29,581  
    Total noninterest expense   29,948       30,597       127,578       134,946  
    Income before income taxes   20,719       13,111       63,292       79,417  
    Income tax expense   4,222       2,787       13,575       16,672  
    Net income $ 16,497     $ 10,324     $ 49,717     $ 62,745  
                                   
    South Plains Financial, Inc.
    Loan Composition
    (Unaudited)
    (Dollars in thousands)
     
      As of
      December 31,
    2024
      December 31,
    2023
                   
    Loans:              
    Commercial Real Estate $ 1,119,063     $ 1,081,056  
    Commercial – Specialized   388,955       372,376  
    Commercial – General   557,371       517,361  
    Consumer:              
    1-4 Family Residential   566,400       534,731  
    Auto Loans   254,474       305,271  
    Other Consumer   64,936       74,168  
    Construction   103,855       129,190  
    Total loans held for investment $ 3,055,054     $ 3,014,153  
                   
    South Plains Financial, Inc.
    Deposit Composition
    (Unaudited)
    (Dollars in thousands)
     
      As of
      December 31,
    2024
      December 31,
    2023
                   
    Deposits:              
    Noninterest-bearing deposits $ 935,510     $ 974,201  
    NOW & other transaction accounts   498,718       562,066  
    MMDA & other savings   1,741,988       1,722,170  
    Time deposits   444,660       367,716  
    Total deposits $ 3,620,876     $ 3,626,153  
                   
    South Plains Financial, Inc.
    Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures (Unaudited)
    (Dollars in thousands)
       
      For the quarter ended
      December 31,
    2024
      September 30,
    2024
      June 30,
    2024
      March 31,
    2024
      December 31,
    2023
    Pre-tax, pre-provision income                                      
    Net income $ 16,497     $ 11,212     $ 11,134     $ 10,874     $ 10,324  
    Income tax expense   4,222       3,094       3,116       3,143       2,787  
    Provision for credit losses   1,200       495       1,775       830       600  
    Pre-tax, pre-provision income $ 21,919     $ 14,801     $ 16,025     $ 14,847     $ 13,711  
                                           
      As of
      December 31,
    2024
      September 30,
    2024
      June 30,
    2024
      March 31,
    2024
      December 31,
    2023
    Tangible common equity                            
    Total common stockholders’ equity $ 438,949     $ 443,122     $ 417,985     $ 408,712     $ 407,114  
    Less:  goodwill and other intangibles   (21,035 )     (21,197 )     (21,379 )     (21,562 )     (21,744 )
                                 
    Tangible common equity $ 417,914     $ 421,925     $ 396,606     $ 387,150     $ 385,370  
                                 
    Tangible assets                            
    Total assets $ 4,232,239     $ 4,337,659     $ 4,220,936     $ 4,218,993     $ 4,204,793  
    Less:  goodwill and other intangibles   (21,035 )     (21,197 )     (21,379 )     (21,562 )     (21,744 )
                                 
    Tangible assets $ 4,211,204     $ 4,316,462     $ 4,199,557     $ 4,197,431     $ 4,183,049  
                                 
    Shares outstanding   16,455,826       16,386,627       16,424,021       16,431,755       16,417,099  
                                 
    Total stockholders’ equity to total assets   10.37 %     10.22 %     9.90 %     9.69 %     9.68 %
    Tangible common equity to tangible assets   9.92 %     9.77 %     9.44 %     9.22 %     9.21 %
    Book value per share $ 26.67     $ 27.04     $ 25.45     $ 24.87     $ 24.80  
    Tangible book value per share $ 25.40     $ 25.75     $ 24.15     $ 23.56     $ 23.47  
                                           

    The MIL Network –

    January 25, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Economics: Identity fraud: BaFin warns consumers about the company Strategic Assets

    Source: Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht – In English

    The Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) warns consumers about the company Strategic Assets and the services it is offering. BaFin suspects the unknown operators of the website strategicassets.pro of offering consumers financial, investment and cryptoasset services without the required authorisation.

    The unknown operators are contacting consumers, claiming that their offer is from Baden-Württembergische Wertpapierbörse GmbH or Börse Stuttgart GmbH. In addition, when advertising its services, the company claims to be supervised by BaFin. However, none of this information is correct. This is a case of identity fraud. Moreover, BaFin does not supervise Strategic Assets.

    BaFin is issuing this information on the basis of section 37 (4) of the German Banking Act (Kreditwesengesetz – KWG) and section 10 (7) of the German Cryptomarkets Supervision Act (Kryptomaerkteaufsichtsgesetz).

    Please be aware:

    BaFin, the German Federal Criminal Police Office (Bundeskriminalamt – BKA) and the German state criminal police offices (Landeskriminalämter) recommend that consumers seeking to invest money online should exercise the utmost caution and do the necessary research beforehand in order to identify fraud attempts at an early stage.

    MIL OSI Economics –

    January 25, 2025
  • MIL-OSI NGOs: USA: Rohingya survivor demands US regulator investigates Meta’s role in Myanmar atrocities

    Source: Amnesty International –

    Amnesty is supporting activist Maung Sawyeddollah in filing a complaint against Meta and its role in Myanmar violence

    Meta was warned repeatedly by activists and researchers that its algorithms were amplifying hateful content against the Rohingya

    The violence that unfolded in Myanmar in 2017 has been classified as a genocide

    ‘We hope the Securities and Exchange Commission will consider the submission and investigate Meta for any potential violations of federal securities laws’ – Mandi Mudarikwa

    Rohingya human rights activist, Maung Sawyeddollah, has filed a whistleblower complaint with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), asking the agency to investigate Meta for alleged violations of securities laws stemming from the company’s misrepresentations to shareholders on its substantial contribution to what the US government has classified as genocide perpetrated against the Rohingya in Myanmar in 2017. 

    Amnesty International, the Open Society Justice Initiative and Victim Advocates International have jointly supported the submission. 

    Mandi Mudarikwa, Head of Strategic Litigation at Amnesty International, said: 

    “The submission provides information on Meta’s alleged role in the atrocities perpetrated against the Rohingya, and highlights misrepresentations to the SEC and public investors. We hope the SEC will consider the submission and investigate Meta for any potential violations of federal securities laws.”

    Meta: Repeatedly warned against amplifying harmful content

    The submission to the SEC, an independent US agency responsible for ensuring that shareholders are treated fairly and honestly, details how Meta was repeatedly warned by activists and researchers about the risk of Facebook being used to foment and incite violence against the Rohingya in the lead-up to 2017. The filing argues that, despite this, Meta continued leaving out key information on this risk of real-world violence in statements made to public investors. 

    A 2022 report by Amnesty  found that Meta contributed to the atrocities in Myanmar against the Rohingya through Facebook’s use of algorithms that amplify harmful content and inadequate moderation of harmful content, which breached its own Community Standards – rules that define permissible content on the platform. 

    The report revealed that Meta’s business model relied on invasive profiling and targeted advertising, which promoted the spread of harmful content including incitement to violence. Meta’s algorithmic systems are designed to maximize user engagement in order to increase its advertising revenue. As a result, these systems often have the effect of prioritising inflammatory, divisive, and harmful content. 

    Maung Sawyeddollah, recalling his frustration at his futile attempts to alert Meta about the proliferation of harmful content on Facebook, said:

    “I saw a lot of horrible things on Facebook, and I just thought that people who posted were bad. I didn’t realise then that Facebook was to blame. One day I saw a post that made me feel so bad. I tried to report that to Facebook. I said it was hate speech but I got a response that said…it does not go against Community Standards.” 

    Even though such content clearly violated Facebook’s Community Standards, which recently changed as part of a new policy shift, Meta did not sufficiently enforce these in Myanmar nor adequately remove anti-Rohingya content in the months and years before the 2017 atrocities in northern Rakhine State. The insufficient number of content moderators with necessary language skills, the result of the company’s budgeting and staffing choices, also contributed to Meta’s shortcomings. This reflects the company’s broader failure to adequately invest in content moderation across many countries in Asia, Africa and Latin America, notwithstanding its public claims. 

    Eva Buzo, Executive Director at Victim Advocates International, explained:

    “In Myanmar, where Facebook served as the primary social media platform and news source, the reckless deployment of Meta’s harmful algorithms, with negligible safeguards in place, promoted widespread anti-Rohingya online campaigns which contributed to offline violence.”

    The SEC complaint underscores Meta’s failure to heed multiple civil society warnings from 2013 to 2017 regarding Facebook’s potential role in fueling violence. During that time, civil society repeatedly warned Meta employees that the platform was contributing to a pending “genocide”, similar to the role radios played in the Rwandan genocide. 

    James Goldston, Executive Director of the Open Society Justice Initiative, added:

    “Although investors had asked Meta to look into the human rights implications of its business, Meta fell far short of being fully transparent towards them, even though by that time Meta had been warned multiple times about the escalating situation in Myanmar and Facebook’s role in it.”

    Despite these warnings, between 2015 to 2017, Meta told investors that Facebook’s algorithms did not result in polarization, despite having been warned of Facebook’s role in proliferating anti-Rohingya content in Myanmar. At the same time, Meta did not fully disclose in its financial reporting to shareholders the risks the company’s operations in Myanmar entailed. Instead, in 2015 and 2016 Meta objected to shareholder proposals to conduct a human rights impact assessment and to set up an internal committee to oversee the company’s policies and practices concerning international public issues, including human rights. 

    Violence in Ethiopia

    Public pressure in 2018 forced Meta to partially and belatedly acknowledge Facebook’s role in the Rohingya atrocities. However, between November 2020 and November 2022, Meta again failed to adequately curb the spread of content advocating hatred and violence, this time against the Tigrayans in Ethiopia, ultimately contributing to severe offline violence. This is despite the company’s public claims to the contrary. Plainly, Meta has neither learned its lesson nor taken meaningful steps to curb its role in fueling ethnic violence around the world. 

    Recent policy changes by Meta in the US abolishing independent fact-checking, which may well be rolled out internationally, risk even further exacerbating Meta’s contributions to human rights harms and offline violence, as egregious as the crimes against the Rohingya.   

    MIL OSI NGO –

    January 25, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Tough restrictions for Sheffield hairdresser and baker who falsely claimed £98,000 in Covid loans

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Bankrupt hairdresser claimed two separate loans totalling £98,000 for a new business which only traded for two weeks

    • Hannah Lucy Walker applied for two Covid Bounce Back Loans to claim a total of £98,000 
    • She took the loans for a new business which was not entitled to any money under the scheme and gave false information in her applications 
    • Walker is now subject to 12 years of sanctions which restrict her finance and business activities to protect the public from further harm 

    A bankrupt former hairdresser from Sheffield is subject to 12 years of stringent sanctions after the Official Receiver found she abused the Covid Bounce Back Loan scheme to claim almost £100,000 she was not entitled to. 

    Hannah Lucy Walker, 31, of Pollard Crescent in Sheffield, was originally a hairdresser. 

    But when Covid lockdowns were in operation during May 2020, she also began a baking business, trading as Something Sweet. 

    And on 25 June 2020, Walker applied for a £50,000 Bounce Back Loan for Something Sweet – which only ever traded for two weeks – declaring its turnover was £256,000. 

    The next day she applied to a different bank for another Bounce Back Loan of £48,000 for the baking business. This time she claimed the business had a turnover of £230,000. 

    Walker was made bankrupt in March 2024, with outstanding debts of around £109,000 including the full amount of both loans.  

    The Official Receiver, whose duty includes investigating the cause of a bankruptcy, found that Something Sweet had not been eligible to apply for a loan. 

    Samantha Crook, Deputy Official Receiver at the Insolvency Service, said: 

    Hannah Walker blatantly abused a scheme designed to support existing businesses during one of the toughest times the country faced. 

    She breached the rules of the scheme by taking out not one, but two loans, for a business that was not even eligible for a loan. 

    These restrictions will curtail her business activities for a long time to help protect the public from further financial harm.

    Under the rules of the Bounce Back Loan scheme, businesses must have been trading by 1 March 2020 in order to apply for a loan.  

    The rules allowed applications for a single loan per business of up to 25% of its 2019 turnover – or of an estimated turnover if the business had started during the previous financial year – up to a maximum of £50,000. Any money claimed was to be used for the economic support of the business. 

    Walker’s baking business was not entitled to any money through the scheme. She did not apply for a loan to support her hairdressing business. 

    Walker signed a Bankruptcy Restrictions Undertaking in which she did not dispute that she had provided false information on two Bounce Back Loan applications to receive a total of £98,000 to which she was not entitled. 

    She must abide by the restrictions, which extend the terms of her original bankruptcy – usually a period of 12 months – for a further 12 years.  

    They prevent Walker from acting as a company director without permission from the court and from borrowing more than £500 without declaring that she is subject to the sanctions. She is also restricted from holding certain roles in public organisations while subject to the measures. 

    The Secretary of State for Business and Trade accepted the undertaking on 14 January 2025. The restrictions will run until 13 January 2037. 

    Further information

    • Hannah Lucy Walker is of Pollard Crescent, Sheffield. Her date of birth is 15 April 1993 
    • Further guidance about Bankruptcy Restrictions Orders and Undertakings     
    • Details of BRO and BRU restrictions relating to individuals can be found on the Individual Insolvency Register

    Share this page

    The following links open in a new tab

    • Share on Facebook (opens in new tab)
    • Share on Twitter (opens in new tab)

    Updates to this page

    Published 24 January 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom –

    January 25, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: American National Announces Full Redemption of Outstanding Depositary Shares Representing Interests in its 5.95% Fixed-Rate Reset Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series A and Intent to Voluntarily Delist and Deregister

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    HOUSTON, Jan. 24, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — American National Group Inc. (the “Company”) (NYSE: ANG PRA) today announced that the Company will redeem (the “Redemption”) all the 16,000 outstanding shares of its 5.95% Fixed-Rate Reset Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series A (the “Series A Preferred Stock”) and the corresponding 16,000,000 depositary shares, each representing a 1/1,000th interest in one share of Series A Preferred Stock (the “Depositary Shares”), on February 24, 2025 (the “Redemption Date”).

    The Depositary Shares will be redeemed for a redemption price equal to $25.00 per Depositary Share (equivalent to $25,000 per share of Series A Preferred Stock) plus an amount equal to any declared but unpaid dividends and the portion of the quarterly dividend attributable to 1/1,000th of a share of Series A Preferred Stock to the then-current dividend period that has not been declared and paid to, but excluding, the Redemption Date (the “Redemption Price”).

    The Depositary Shares are held through The Depository Trust Company (“DTC”) and will be redeemed in accordance with the applicable procedures of DTC. Payment to DTC for the Depositary Shares will be made by Computershare Inc., the Company’s redemption agent (the “Redemption Agent”), in accordance with the terms set forth in the Redemption Agent Agreement that governs the redemption of the Depositary Shares. All questions about the notice of redemption and related materials should be directed to the Redemption Agent at the following address and phone number:

    Computershare Inc.
    Attention: Corporate Actions Department
    150 Royall Street
    Canton, MA 02021
    Tel: 1-800-546-5141

    Upon the Redemption, no Series A Preferred Stock or Depositary Shares will remain outstanding, and all rights with respect to such stock or depositary shares will cease and terminate except only the right of the holders of the Depositary Shares to receive the Redemption Price, without interest. The information contained in this press release does not constitute a notice of redemption with respect to the Series A Preferred Stock or Depositary Shares. Investors in the Depositary Shares should contact the bank or broker through which they hold a beneficial interest in the Depositary Shares for information about obtaining the Redemption Price for the Depositary Shares in which they have a beneficial interest.

    In connection with the Redemption, the Company intends to delist the Depositary Shares from the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) and to deregister the Depositary Shares from registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). The Company intends to request that NYSE file with the SEC a notification of removal from listing and registration on Form 25 to effect the delisting of all of the Depositary Shares from NYSE. In addition, after the Redemption Date, the Company intends to file a certification on Form 15 with the SEC requesting the termination of registration of all of the Depositary Shares. Deregistration of the Depositary Shares is expected to become effective 90 days after the Form 15 is filed.

    ABOUT AMERICAN NATIONAL GROUP INC.

    American National Group Inc. offers a broad array of insurance products and services through its operating subsidiaries, American National and American Equity Life. Operating across 50 U.S. states, the group’s customer offering includes annuities, personal and commercial property and casualty insurance and life insurance. For more information, please visit AmericanNational.com/home/about-us/investor-relations.

    Forward-Looking Statements

    All statements contained in this press release may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements give expectations or forecasts of future events and do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. They may relate to markets for our products, trends in our operations or financial results, strategic alternatives, future operations, strategies, plans, partnerships, investments, share buybacks and other financial developments. They use words and terms such as “anticipate,” “assume,” “believe,” “can,” “continue,” “could,” “enable,” “estimate,” “expect,” “foreseeable,” “goal,” “improve,” “intend,” “likely,” “may,” “model,” “objective,” “opportunity,” “outlook,” “plan,” “potential,” “project,” “remain,” “risk,” “seek,” “should,” “strategy,” “target,” “will,” “would,” and other words and terms of similar meaning or that are otherwise tied to future periods or future performance, in each case in all forms of speech and derivative forms, or similar words, as well as any projections of future events or results. Forward-looking statements, by their nature, are subject to a variety of assumptions, risks, and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results projected. Many of these risks and uncertainties cannot be controlled by the Company. Factors that may cause our actual decisions or results to differ materially from those contemplated by these forward-looking statements include, among other things, the factors set forth in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023, as updated by the Company’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarters ended March 31, 2024, June 30, 2024 and September 30, 2024 and any other documents we file with the SEC.

    Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date the statement was made and the Company undertakes no obligation to update such forward-looking statements except as required by law. There can be no assurance that other factors not currently disclosed or anticipated by the Company will not materially adversely affect our results of operations or plans. Investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements made by us or on our behalf.

    Contact: Steven Schwartz   
    Treasurer, Head of Investor Relations
    888-221-1234 ext. 3763
    sschwartz@american-equity.com

    The MIL Network –

    January 25, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Marquette National Corporation Increases Quarterly Dividend 10.7 Percent and Announces a Common Stock Repurchase Program

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    CHICAGO, Jan. 24, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Marquette National Corporation (OTCQX: MNAT) today announced that its Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.31 per share, an increase of 10.7% from the previous quarter dividend rate. The dividend will be payable on April 1, 2025 to shareholders of record on March 14, 2025. As of December 31, 2024, Marquette had 4,367,477 shares issued and outstanding.

    The Company also announced that its Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $1,000,000 of its outstanding common stock at prevailing market prices through open market or negotiated transactions. The repurchase program is authorized to last through December 31, 2025.

    Marquette National Corporation is a diversified bank holding company with total assets of $2.2 billion. The Company’s banking subsidiary, Marquette Bank, is a full-service, community bank that serves the financial needs of communities in Chicagoland, offering an extensive line of financial solutions, including retail banking, real estate lending, trust, insurance, investments, wealth management and business banking to consumers and commercial customers. Marquette Bank has 20 branches located in: Chicago, Bolingbrook, Bridgeview, Evergreen Park, Hickory Hills, Lemont, New Lenox, Oak Forest, Oak Lawn, Orland Park, Summit and Tinley Park, Illinois. For more information visit: https://emarquettebank.com

    Special Note Concerning Forward-Looking Statements
    This document contains, and future oral and written statements of the Company and its management may contain, forward-looking statements with respect to the financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance and business of the Company. Forward-looking statements, which may be based upon beliefs, expectations and assumptions of the Company’s management and on information currently available to management, are generally identifiable by the use of words such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “intend,” “estimate,” “may,” “will,” “would,” “could,” “should” or other similar expressions. A number of factors, many of which are beyond the ability of the Company to control or predict, could cause actual results to differ materially from those in its forward-looking statements. These factors include, among others, the following: (i) the strength of the local, state, national and international economies (including the effects of inflationary pressures and supply chain constraints); (ii) the economic impact of any future terrorist threats and attacks, widespread disease or pandemics, acts of war or other threats thereof (including the ongoing Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the Russian invasion of Ukraine), or other adverse external events that could cause economic deterioration or instability in credit markets, and the response of the local, state and national governments to any such adverse external events; (iii) changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted by state and federal regulatory agencies, the Financial Accounting Standards Board or the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board; (iv) changes in local, state and federal laws, regulations and governmental policies concerning the Company’s general business as a result of the upcoming 2024 presidential election or any changes in response to failures of other banks; (v) changes in interest rates and prepayment rates of the Company’s assets (including the impact of the significant rate increases by the Federal Reserve since 2022); (vi) increased competition in the financial services sector (including from non-bank competitors such as credit unions and “fintech” companies) and the inability to attract new customers; (vii) changes in technology and the ability to develop and maintain secure and reliable electronic systems; (viii) the loss of key executives or employees; (ix) changes in consumer spending; (x) unexpected outcomes of existing or new litigation involving the Company; (xi) the economic impact of exceptional weather occurrences such as tornadoes, floods and blizzards; (xii) fluctuations in the value of securities held in our securities portfolio; (xiii) concentrations within our loan portfolio, large loans to certain borrowers, and large deposits from certain clients; (xiv) the concentration of large deposits from certain clients who have balances above current Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance limits and may withdraw deposits to diversity their exposure; (xv) the level of non-performing assets on our balance sheets; (xvi) interruptions involving our information technology and communications systems or third-party servicers; (xvii) breaches or failures of our information security controls or cybersecurity-related incidents, and (xviii) the ability of the Company to manage the risks associated with the foregoing as well as anticipated.. These risks and uncertainties should be considered in evaluating forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. Additionally, all statements in this document, including forward-looking statements, speak only as of the date they are made, and the Company undertakes no obligation to update any statement in light of new information or future events.

    The MIL Network –

    January 25, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: CareCloud Shareholders Tentatively Approve Proposal to Increase Authorized Common Shares with Record Voter Turnout

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    SOMERSET, N.J., Jan. 24, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — CareCloud, Inc. (the “Company” or “CareCloud”) (Nasdaq: CCLD, CCLDO, CCLDP), a leading provider of healthcare information technology and generative AI solutions for medical practices and health systems nationwide, today announced that shareholders have tentatively approved the proposal to increase the number of authorized common shares.

    Approximately 10.4 million votes by proxy have been returned (the “votes”) in favor of increasing the authorized number of shares of common stock from 35 million to 85 million shares, marking one of the highest levels of positive votes in the Company’s history. The votes in favor represent over 80% of the total votes submitted.

    “We truly appreciate the shareholders’ confidence in the Company’s direction, reflected in the nearly record-breaking number of ‘yes’ votes received by proxy,” said Stephen Snyder, Co-CEO of CareCloud.

    The final vote count will be announced after the Common Stock Shareholder Special Meeting, scheduled for January 27, 2025.

    About CareCloud

    CareCloud brings disciplined innovation to the business of healthcare. Our suite of technology-enabled solutions helps clients increase financial and operational performance, streamline clinical workflows and improve the patient experience. More than 40,000 providers count on CareCloud to help them improve patient care while reducing administrative burdens and operating costs. Learn more about our products and services including revenue cycle management (RCM), practice management (PM), electronic health records (EHR), business intelligence, patient experience management (PXM) and digital health at http://www.carecloud.com.

    Follow CareCloud on LinkedIn, X and Facebook.

    SOURCE CareCloud

    Company Contact:
    Norman Roth
    Interim Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Controller
    CareCloud, Inc.
    nroth@carecloud.com

    Investor Contact:
    Stephen Snyder
    Co-CEO
    CareCloud, Inc.
    ir@carecloud.com

    The MIL Network –

    January 25, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Matador Technologies Adds Gold to Balance Sheet Ahead of Product Launch

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    TORONTO, Jan. 24, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Matador Technologies Inc. (“Matador” or the “Company”) (TSXV: MATA) has announced an additional purchase of gold to its balance sheet, supporting the development of its gold product set to launch in early 2025. Matador purchased 1 kilogram of gold for approximately USD$89,208, inclusive of fees and expenses, bringing Matador’s gold balance to 2 kilograms.

    This allocation is aligned with Matador’s vision of pairing traditional assets like gold with cutting-edge blockchain technologies. By sourcing high-quality physical gold from the Royal Canadian Mint through its trusted partnership with Kitco Metals Inc., Matador ensures both the reliability and security of its gold reserves. All physical gold holdings will remain securely stored at the Royal Canadian Mint. This decision also supports Matador’s long-term capital preservation and corporate treasury strategy in holding USD-denominated assets.

    “Gold is a cornerstone of Matador’s first product, not just as a financial asset but as the foundation for our digital gold products,” said Deven Soni, CEO of Matador Technologies. “This move reflects our commitment to combining the timeless appeal of gold with the modern engagement opportunities presented by blockchain technology.”

    The Company’s upcoming gold product is designed to breathe new life into the gold market, targeting those intrigued by the potential of blockchain and digital assets. By leveraging Bitcoin as part of the platform for its digital gold products, Matador ensures the highest standards of security, stability, and trust for its users.

    Matador’s continued efforts to bridge traditional assets like gold and new technologies reflect its commitment to delivering a secure, accessible platform for users of all backgrounds.

    For additional information, please contact:

    Media Contact:
    Sunny Ray
    President
    Email: sunny@matador.network

    Phone: 647-932-2668

    About Matador Technologies Inc.
    Matador Technologies Inc. is a digital gold platform leveraging blockchain technology to digitize real-world assets like gold. Focused on building innovative financial solutions, Matador is at the forefront of integrating blockchain technology to preserve and grow value. Matador’s digital gold platform aims to democratize the gold buying experience, combining the best of modern technology and time-proven assets, to create an app that will allow users to buy, sell, and store gold 24/7 in a fun and engaging way.

    Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information

    NEITHER THE TSX VENTURE EXCHANGE NOR ITS REGULATION SERVICES PROVIDER (AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED IN THE POLICIES OF THE TSX VENTURE EXCHANGE) ACCEPTS RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ADEQUACY OR ACCURACY OF THIS RELEASE.

    This news release does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any securities in any jurisdiction.

    Forward Looking Statements – Certain information set forth in this news release may contain forward-looking statements that involve substantial known and unknown risks and uncertainties, including risks associated with the implementation of the Company’s treasury management strategy and the launch of its mobile application as currently proposed or at all. These forward-looking statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, certain of which are beyond the control of the Company, including with respect to the potential acquisition of Bitcoin and/or US dollars, the pricing of such acquisitions and the timing of future operations. Readers are cautioned that the assumptions used in the preparation of such information, although considered reasonable at the time of preparation, may prove to be imprecise and, as such, undue reliance should not be placed on forward-looking statements.

    The MIL Network –

    January 25, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Lakeland Financial Reports Annual Net Income of $93.5 million, Organic Average Loan Growth of 5% and Average Deposit Growth of 4%

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    WARSAW, Ind., Jan. 24, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Lakeland Financial Corporation (Nasdaq Global Select/LKFN), parent company of Lake City Bank, today reported net income of $93.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, versus $93.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. Diluted earnings per share were $3.63 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2024, versus $3.65 for 2023.

    Net income was $24.2 million for the three months ended December 31, 2024, a decrease of $5.4 million, or 18%, compared with net income of $29.6 million for the three months ended December 31, 2023. Diluted earnings per share of $0.94 for the fourth quarter of 2024 decreased by 19% from $1.16 for the fourth quarter of 2023. On a linked quarter basis, net income increased 4%, or $852,000, from third quarter 2024 net income of $23.3 million. Linked quarter diluted earnings per share improved by 3% from $0.91 for the third quarter of 2024.

    Pretax pre-provision earnings, which is a non-GAAP measure, were $128.4 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2024, an increase of $12.3 million, or 11%, compared to $116.2 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2023. Pretax pre-provision earnings were $32.9 million for the three months ended December 31, 2024, a decrease of $3.4 million, or 9%, compared to $36.4 million for the three months ended December 31, 2023. Pretax pre-provision earnings increased by $2.1 million, or 7%, compared to $30.8 million on a linked quarter basis.

    “2024 continued a long and consistent trend of organic growth in our balance sheet. We successfully expanded both our loan and deposit franchises during the year,” stated David M. Findlay, Chairman and CEO. “We are particularly pleased with the 9-basis point expansion of our net interest margin on a linked quarter basis as we effectively managed the balance sheet throughout the year.”

    Quarterly Financial Performance

    Fourth Quarter 2024 versus Fourth Quarter 2023 highlights:

    • Tangible book value per share grew by $1.25, or 5%, to $26.47
    • Total risk-based capital ratio improved to 15.90%, compared to 15.47%
    • Tangible capital ratio improved to 10.19%, compared to 9.91%
    • Average loans grew by $206.9 million, or 4%, to $5.09 billion
    • Core deposit growth of $274.3 million, or 5%, to $5.9 billion
    • Average equity increased by $121.1 million, or 21%
    • Return on average equity of 13.87%, compared to 20.52%
    • Return on average assets of 1.42%, compared to 1.80%
    • Net interest margin improved to 3.25% versus 3.23%
    • Net interest income increased by $3.1 million, or 6%
    • Noninterest expense increased by $1.2 million, or 4%
    • Provision expense of $3.7 million, compared to $300,000
    • Net charge offs of $1.4 million versus $433,000
    • Watch list loans as a percentage of total loans increased to 4.13% from 3.72%

    Fourth Quarter 2024 versus Third Quarter 2024 highlights:

    • Total risk-based capital ratio improved to 15.90% from 15.75%
    • Average equity growth of $23.6 million, or 4%
    • Average loans grew by $22.3 million, or less than 1%, to $5.09 billion
    • Core deposits increased by $118.6 million, or 2%, to $5.8 billion
    • Net interest margin improved 9 basis points to 3.25% versus 3.16%
    • Return on average equity of 13.87%, compared to 13.85%
    • Return on average assets of 1.42%, compared to 1.39%
    • Noninterest income decreased by $41,000, or less than 1%
    • Noninterest expense increased by $260,000, or 1%
    • Provision expense of $3.7 million, compared to $3.1 million
    • Individually analyzed and watch list loans declined by $56.4 million, or 21%
    • Watch list loans as a percentage of total loans improved to 4.13% from 5.27%

    Capital Strength

    The company’s total capital as a percentage of risk-weighted assets improved to 15.90% at December 31, 2024, compared to 15.47% at December 31, 2023 and 15.75% at September 30, 2024. These capital levels significantly exceeded the 10.00% regulatory threshold required to be characterized as “well capitalized” and reflect the company’s robust capital base.

    The company’s tangible common equity to tangible assets ratio, which is a non-GAAP financial measure, improved to 10.19% at December 31, 2024, compared to 9.91% at December 31, 2023. The tangible common equity ratio contracted from 10.47% at September 30, 2024. Unrealized losses from available-for-sale investment securities were $191.1 million at December 31, 2024, compared to $174.6 million at December 31, 2023 and $154.5 million at September 30, 2024. Excluding the impact of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) on tangible common equity and tangible assets, the company’s ratio of adjusted tangible common equity to adjusted tangible assets, a non-GAAP financial measure, improved to 12.37% at December 31, 2024, compared to 11.99% at December 31, 2023 and 12.29% at September 30, 2024.

    As announced on January 14, 2025, the board of directors approved a cash dividend for the fourth quarter of $0.50 per share, payable on February 5, 2025, to shareholders of record as of January 25, 2025. The fourth quarter dividend per share represents a 4% increase from the $0.48 dividend per share paid for the fourth quarter of 2023.

    “The continued growth in our capital base supports the increase in our dividend rate paid to shareholders and contributes to the growth in total return for shareholders. The compounded annual growth rate for our dividend is 15% since 2012,” stated Kristin L. Pruitt, President.

    Loan Portfolio

    Average total loans for the twelve months ended December 31, 2024 were $5.04 billion, an increase of $225.7 million, or 5%, from $4.81 billion for the twelve months ended December 31, 2023. Average total loans of $5.09 billion in the fourth quarter of 2024, increased $206.9 million, or 4%, from $4.88 billion for the fourth quarter of 2023, and increased $22.3 million, or less than 1%, from $5.06 billion for the third quarter of 2024.

    “Loan growth in 2024 benefited from healthy increases in both our commercial and consumer lending activities,” noted Findlay. “We were pleased to report 8% growth in consumer loans, 6% growth in CRE and multi-family loans, and 2% growth in commercial and industrial loans for 2024. Our Indiana markets continue to benefit from expanding economic activity stimulated by the pro-business operating environment. We continue to be focused on active business development efforts in every market and we are looking forward to continued organic growth in 2025.”

    Total loans, net of deferred loan fees, increased by $200.6 million, or 4%, from $4.92 billion as of December 31, 2023 to $5.12 billion as of December 31, 2024. The increase in loans occurred across much of the portfolio with our commercial real estate and multi-family residential loan portfolio growing by $155.0 million, or 6%, our commercial and industrial loan portfolio growing by $30.1 million, or 2%, and our consumer 1-4 family mortgage loans portfolio growing by $34.0 million, or 7%. These increases were offset by a decrease to other commercial loans of $25.1 million, or 21%. On a linked quarter basis, total loans, net of deferred loan fees, increased by $35.7 million, or 1%, from $5.08 billion at September 30, 2024. The linked quarter increase was primarily a result of growth in total commercial real estate and multi-family residential loans of $42.7 million, or 2%, and growth in total agri-business and agricultural loans of $29.0 million, or 8%. Offsetting these increases was a decrease in total commercial and industrial loans of $42.0 million, or 3%.

    Commercial loan originations for the fourth quarter included approximately $390.0 million in loan originations, offset by approximately $359.0 million in commercial loan pay downs. Line of credit usage increased to 41% as of December 31, 2024, compared to 39% at December 31, 2023 and was unchanged from 41% as of September 30, 2024. Total available lines of credit contracted by $238.0 million, or 5%, as compared to a year ago, and line usage decreased by $2.0 million, or less than 1%, over that period. The company has limited exposure to commercial office space borrowers, all of which are in the bank’s Indiana markets. Loans totaling $101.7 million for this sector represented 2% of total loans at December 31, 2024, a decrease of $899,000, or 1%, from September 30, 2024. Commercial real estate loans secured by multi-family residential properties and secured by non-farm non-residential properties were approximately 213% of total risk-based capital at December 31, 2024.

    Diversified Deposit Base

    The bank’s diversified deposit base has grown on a year over year basis and on a linked quarter basis.

     
    DEPOSIT DETAIL
    (unaudited, in thousands)
               
      December 31, 2024   September 30, 2024   December 31, 2023
    Retail $ 1,780,726     30.2 %   $ 1,709,899     29.3 %   $ 1,794,958     31.4 %
    Commercial   2,269,049     38.4       2,304,041     39.5       2,227,147     38.9  
    Public funds   1,809,631     30.7       1,726,869     29.6       1,563,015     27.3  
    Core deposits   5,859,406     99.3       5,740,809     98.4       5,585,120     97.6  
    Brokered deposits   41,560     0.7       96,504     1.6       135,405     2.4  
    Total $ 5,900,966     100.0 %   $ 5,837,313     100.0 %   $ 5,720,525     100.0 %
                                             

    Total deposits increased $180.4 million, or 3%, from $5.72 billion as of December 31, 2023 to $5.90 billion as of December 31, 2024. The increase in total deposits was driven by an increase in core deposits (which excludes brokered deposits) of $274.3 million, or 5%. Total core deposits at December 31, 2024 were $5.86 billion and represented 99% of total deposits, as compared to $5.59 billion and 98% of total deposits at December 31, 2023. Brokered deposits were $41.6 million, or 1% of total deposits, at December 31, 2024, compared to $135.4 million, or 2% of total deposits, at December 31, 2023.

    The increase in core deposits since December 31, 2023 reflects growth in commercial deposits and public funds deposits. Public funds deposits grew annually by $246.6 million, or 16%, to $1.81 billion. Commercial deposits grew annually by $41.9 million, or 2%, to $2.27 billion. Retail deposits contracted annually by $14.2 million, or 1%, to $1.78 billion. The increase in public funds deposits drove the change in the composition of core deposits as public funds deposits as a percentage of total deposits increased to 31%, from 27%. Commercial and retail deposits as a percentage of total deposits contracted to 38%, from 39%, and to 30%, from 31%, respectively. Growth in public funds was positively impacted by the addition of a new public funds customers in the Lake City Bank footprint which included the addition of their operating accounts.

    On a linked quarter basis, total deposits increased $63.7 million, or 1%, from $5.84 billion at September 30, 2024 to $5.90 billion at December 31, 2024. Core deposits increased by $118.6 million, or 2%, while brokered deposits decreased by $54.9 million, or 57%. Linked quarter growth in core deposits resulted primarily from an increase in public funds deposits of $82.8 million, or 5%, and growth in retail deposits of $70.8 million, or 4%. Offsetting these increases was a decrease in commercial deposits of $35.0 million, or 2%.

    “Core deposit growth was steady throughout 2024 and accounts for 99% of the funding sources for Lake City Bank,” commented Findlay. “We are pleased that our growth in core deposits came from every region of the bank. We continue to successfully fund the loan growth with in-market stable and diversified deposit growth. We continue to gain market share in our more mature Northern Indiana markets and implemented strategies to enhance growth in the Indianapolis market through data-driven marketing and business development efforts.”

    Average total deposits were $6.01 billion for the fourth quarter of 2024, an increase of $208.5 million, or 4%, from $5.80 billion for the fourth quarter of 2023. Average interest-bearing deposits drove the increase in average total deposits and increased by $301.1 million, or 7%. Contributing to the overall growth of interest-bearing deposits was an increase to average interest-bearing checking accounts of $431.9 million, or 14%. Offsetting this increase was a reduction in average time deposits of $98.9 million, or 9%, and a decrease to average savings deposits of $31.9 million, or 10%. Average noninterest-bearing demand deposits decreased by $92.5 million, or 7%.

    On a linked quarter basis, average total deposits increased by $130.9 million, or 2%, from $5.88 billion for the third quarter of 2024 to $6.01 billion for the fourth quarter of 2024. Average interest-bearing deposits drove the increase to total average deposits, which increased by $93.2 million, or 2%. An increase to interest bearing checking accounts of $209.6 million, or 6%, drove the increase to average interest-bearing deposits on a linked quarter basis. Offsetting this increase was a decrease to total average time deposits of $111.1 million, or 10%. Average noninterest-bearing demand deposits increased by $37.7 million, or 3%.

    Checking account trends as of December 31, 2024 compared to December 31, 2023, include growth of $310.5 million, or 24%, in aggregate public fund checking account balances, growth of $24.5 million, or 1%, in aggregate commercial checking account balances, and expansion of $34.4 million, or 4%, in aggregate retail checking account balances. The number of accounts has also grown for all three segments, with growth of 7% for public funds accounts, 2% for commercial accounts and 1% for retail accounts during 2024.

    Deposits not covered by FDIC deposit insurance as a percentage of total deposits were 62% as of December 31, 2024, compared to 61% at September 30, 2024, and 57% at December 31, 2023, reflecting the growth in public fund deposits over the period. Deposits not covered by FDIC deposit insurance or the Indiana Public Deposit Insurance Fund (which insures public funds deposits in Indiana), were 32% of total deposits as of December 31, 2024, compared to 32% at September 30, 2024, and 31% as of December 31, 2023. As of December 31, 2024, 98% of deposit accounts had deposit balances less than $250,000.

    Net Interest Margin

    Net interest margin was 3.25% for the fourth quarter of 2024, representing a 2 basis point increase from 3.23% for the fourth quarter of 2023. Earning assets yields decreased by 15 basis points to 5.81% for the fourth quarter of 2024 from 5.96% for the fourth quarter of 2023. The decrease in earning asset yields was offset by a decrease in the company’s funding costs of 17 basis points as interest expense as a percentage of average earning assets decreased to 2.56% for the fourth quarter of 2024, compared to 2.73% for the fourth quarter of 2023.

    Linked quarter net interest margin expanded by 9 basis point to 3.25% for the fourth quarter of 2024, compared to 3.16% for the third quarter of 2024. Average earning asset yields decreased by 23 basis points from 6.04% during the third quarter of 2024 to 5.81% during the fourth quarter of 2024 and were offset by a 32 basis point decrease in interest expense as a percentage of average earning assets from 2.88% to 2.56%. The cumulative 100 basis point decline in the Federal Funds Rate during 2024, drove the reduction in funding costs that provided for the net interest margin expansion through deposit repricing. Notably, the deposit mix shift from noninterest bearing deposits to interest bearing deposits experienced by the company during the monetary tightening cycle of March 2022 through September 2024 has stabilized with noninterest bearing deposits representing 22% of total deposits at December 31, 2024, compared to 24% at December 31, 2023 and 22% at September 30, 2024.

    “Our thoughtful and strategic balance sheet management strategies led to healthy net interest margin expansion of 9 basis points during the fourth quarter,” noted Lisa M. O’Neill, Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer. “Net interest margin expansion resulted from reduced deposit costs that outpaced loan repricing due to falling short term rates. Our public fund balances are largely tied to the effective federal funds rate, and we also continue to benefit from fixed rate loan repricing to the higher interest rate environment.”

    The loan beta for the current rate-easing cycle is 25% compared to the deposit beta of 31%. The cumulative loan beta, which measures the sensitivity of a bank’s average loan yield to changes in short-term interest rates, was 56% for the recent rate-tightening cycle. The cumulative deposit beta, which measures the sensitivity of a bank’s deposit cost to changes in short-term interest rates, was 54% for the recent rate-tightening cycle.

    Liquidity Overview

    The bank has robust liquidity resources. These resources include secured borrowings available from the Federal Home Loan Bank and the Federal Reserve Bank Discount Window. In addition, the bank has unsecured borrowing capacity through long established relationships within the brokered deposits markets, federal funds lines from correspondent bank partners, and Insured Cash Sweep (ICS) one-way buy funds available from the Intrafi network. As of December 31, 2024, the company had access to an aggregate of $3.7 billion in liquidity from these sources, compared to $3.4 billion at December 31, 2023 and $3.7 billion at September 30, 2024. Utilization from these sources totaled $41.6 million at December 31, 2024, compared to $185.4 million at December 31, 2023 and $96.5 million at September 30, 2024. Core deposits have historically represented, and currently represent, the primary funding resource of the bank at 99% of total deposits and purchased funds.

    Investment Portfolio Overview

    Total investment securities were $1.12 billion at December 31, 2024, reflecting a decrease of $58.7 million, or 5%, as compared to $1.18 billion at December 31, 2023. On a linked quarter basis, investment securities decreased $24.8 million, or 2%, due primarily to a decline in the fair market value of available-for-sale securities of $36.6 million, portfolio cash flows of $15.1 million and partially offset by investment security purchases of $30 million. Investment securities represented 17% of total assets on December 31, 2024, compared to 18% at December 31, 2023 and 17% at September 30, 2024. The ratio of investment securities as a percentage of total assets remains elevated over historical levels of approximately 12% to 14%. The company expects the investment securities portfolio as a percentage of assets to continue to decrease over time as the proceeds from pay downs, sales and maturities are used to fund loan growth and for general liquidity purposes. Tax equivalent adjusted effective duration for the investment portfolio was 6.0 years at December 31, 2024, compared to 6.5 years and 6.3 years at December 31, 2023 and September 30, 2024, respectively. Tax equivalent adjusted effective duration of the investment portfolio remains elevated as compared to 4.0 years at December 31, 2019 prior to the deployment of excess liquidity to the investment portfolio and the impact of the higher interest rate environment. The company anticipates receiving principal and interest cash flows of approximately $104.2 million during 2025 from the investment securities portfolio and plans to use that liquidity to fund loan growth and to fund new investment securities purchases.

    Net interest income decreased by $356,000, or less than 1%, for the twelve months ended December 31, 2024, as compared to the twelve months ended December 31, 2023. Deposit interest expense increased by $35.0 million. Offsetting the increase in deposit interest expense was an increase in loan interest income of $29.8 million and a reduction in borrowings interest expense of $4.7 million. Net interest income was $51.7 million for the fourth quarter of 2024, representing an increase of $3.1 million, or 6%, as compared to the fourth quarter of 2023. Net interest income for the fourth quarter of 2024 benefited from an increase in loan interest income of $1.9 million and a reduction in interest expense of $667,000 compared to the prior year quarter. On a linked quarter basis, net interest income increased $2.4 million, or 5%, from $49.3 million for the third quarter of 2024. On a linked quarter basis, the increase to net interest income was driven by a $4.1 million reduction in interest expense and a $1.1 million increase in income from short-term investments. Offsetting the reduction in interest expense was a reduction in loan interest income of $2.9 million.

    On a full year basis, revenue increased by $6.6 million, or 3%, to $253.5 million as compared to $246.9 million for 2023. Revenue was $63.6 million for the fourth quarter 2024 representing a decrease of $ 2.2 million or 3%, as compared to the fourth quarter of 2023. On a linked quarter basis, revenue increased by $2.4 million, or 4% from $61.2 million in the third quarter of 2024.

    Asset Quality

    Provision expense was $16.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, an increase of $10.9 million, or 186%, as compared to $5.9 million during 2023. The elevated provision recorded during 2024 as compared to the prior year was primarily driven by an increase in specific allocations from the downgrade of a $43.3 million credit to an industrial company in Northern Indiana. The relationship was placed on nonperforming status in conjunction with the downgrade, which occurred during the second quarter of 2024. Additional specific allocations of $5.5 million were reserved for this credit during the fourth quarter of 2024. The company recorded a provision expense of $3.7 million in the fourth quarter of 2024, compared to provision expense of $300,000 in the fourth quarter of 2023. On a linked quarter basis, provision expense increased by $632,000 from $3.1 million for the third quarter of 2024, or 21%.

    The allowance for credit loss reserve to total loans was 1.68% at December 31, 2024, up from 1.46% at December 31, 2023, and 1.65% at September 30, 2024. Net charge offs were $2.8 million for the full year 2024 compared to $6.5 million for 2023. Net charge offs to total loans were 0.05% for 2024 compared to 0.13% for 2023. Net charge offs in the fourth quarter of 2024 were $1.4 million compared to $433,000 in the fourth quarter of 2023 and $143,000 during the linked third quarter of 2024. Annualized net charge offs to average loans were 0.11% for the fourth quarter of 2024, compared to 0.04% for the fourth quarter of 2023, and 0.01% for the linked third quarter of 2024.

    Nonperforming assets increased $40.8 million, or 253%, to $56.9 million as of December 31, 2024, versus $16.1 million as of December 31, 2023. On a linked quarter basis, nonperforming assets decreased $1.2 million, or 2%, compared to $58.1 million as of September 30, 2024. The ratio of nonperforming assets to total assets at December 31, 2024 increased to 0.85% from 0.25% at December 31, 2023 and decreased from 0.87% at September 30, 2024. The full-year increase in nonperforming assets was primarily driven by the industrial borrower relationship referenced above.

    Total individually analyzed and watch list loans increased by $28.1 million, or 15%, to $211.1 million as of December 31, 2024, versus $183.1 million as of December 31, 2023. On a linked quarter basis, total individually analyzed and watch list loans decreased by $56.4 million, or 21%, from $267.6 million at September 30, 2024. Watch list loans as a percentage of total loans increased by 41 basis points to 4.13% at December 31, 2024, compared to 3.72% at December 31, 2023, and decreased by 114 basis points from 5.27% at September 30, 2024. The linked quarter decrease in total individually analyzed and watch list loans was primarily driven by the removal of six relationships from the watch list with an aggregate balance of $63.7 million, offset by the addition of four downgraded credits with an aggregated balance of $8.4 million. Approximately $45.5 million of the watch list removals were attributable to credit upgrades, with the remaining $18.2 million in removals attributable to payoffs.

    “We are encouraged by the $56 million decrease in watch list credits during the quarter and are cautiously optimistic following our fourth quarter, semi-annual portfolio reviews meetings during which we review every commercial banker’s portfolio,” stated Findlay. “Economic conditions in all of our markets remain stable and we continue to actively manage our loan portfolio challenges.”

    Noninterest Income

    Noninterest income increased by $7.0 million, or 14%, to $56.8 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2024, compared to $49.9 million for the prior year. The increase in noninterest income for the twelve months ended December 31, 2024 was primarily driven by the net gain on sale of Visa shares of $9.0 million. Contributing further to the increase in noninterest income was an increase to wealth and advisory fees of $1.4 million, or 15%, driven by growth in customers and favorable market performance. Bank owned life insurance income increased $1.1 million, or 34%, due to favorable market performance of the company’s variable bank owned life insurance policies. Offsetting these increases was a $4.5 million, or 49%, decrease to other income. Other income was elevated during the twelve months ended December 31, 2023 from insurance and loss recoveries of $6.3 million that were related to the 2023 wire fraud loss. Offsetting the impact of these recoveries was increased investment income from the company’s limited partnership investments and the receipt of an additional $1.0 million in recoveries from the wire fraud loss. Adjusted core noninterest income, a non-GAAP financial measure that excludes the effects of certain non-routine operating events, was $46.8 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2024, an increase of $3.3 million, or 8%, compared to $43.6 million for twelve months ended December 31, 2023.

    Findlay added, “It is very gratifying to report strong growth in core noninterest income for 2024. Our fee-based lines of business made significant contributions to revenue growth during the year. Notably, Wealth Advisory fees grew by 15% and treasury management fees grew by 5%. As we move into 2025, our teams continue to be focused on driving continued growth in these business lines.”

    The company’s noninterest income decreased $5.3 million, or 31%, to $11.9 million for the fourth quarter of 2024, compared to $17.2 million for the fourth quarter of 2023. Wealth advisory fees increased $388,000, or 17%, and bank owned life insurance increased $476,000, or 64%. Other income decreased $6.5 million, or 89%. Other income was elevated during the fourth quarter of 2023 primarily due to insurance and loss recoveries of $6.3 million related to the wire fraud loss. Adjusted core noninterest income was $11.9 million for the fourth quarter of 2024, an increase of $968,000, or 9%, compared to $10.9 million for the fourth quarter of 2023.

    On a linked quarter basis, noninterest income for the fourth quarter of 2024 decreased by $41,000, or less than 1%, from $11.9 million during the third quarter of 2024. The linked quarter decrease was driven by a decrease to other income of $261,000, or 25%, and was offset by an increase to bank owned life insurance income $148,000, or 14%.

    Noninterest Expense

    Noninterest expense decreased by $5.6 million, or 4%, from $130.7 million to $125.1 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2023 and 2024, respectively. Noninterest expense during 2023 was elevated as compared to 2024 due to the wire fraud loss, which added a net $16.7 million to noninterest expense. Offsetting this impact on noninterest expense was a $7.6 million, or 13%, increase in salaries and employees benefits during the full year 2024. The increase to salaries and benefits expense resulted primarily from increases to salaries and wages of $3.2 million, performance-based incentive compensation of $2.3 million, health insurance expense of $918,000, and variable deferred compensation of $950,000, which relates to the company’s variable bank owned life insurance. Other expense increased $2.6 million, or 24%, primarily due to an accrued legal expense of $4.5 million. Data processing fees and supplies increased by $1.2 million, or 8%, from the continued investment in customer-facing and operational technology solutions. Adjusted core noninterest expense, a non-GAAP financial measure that excludes the effects of certain non-routine operating events, was $120.5 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2024, an increase of $6.5 million, or 6%, compared to $114.0 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2023.

    Noninterest expense increased $1.2 million, or 4%, to $30.7 million for the fourth quarter of 2024, compared to $29.4 million during the fourth quarter of 2023. Driving the fourth quarter 2024 increase to noninterest expense was an increase to salaries and benefits expense of $1.5 million, or 10%, which was primarily attributable to increased salary expense of $825,000, deferred compensation of $414,000 and increased health insurance of $222,000. Other expense decreased by $595,000, or 20%, from lower legal accruals. Adjusted core noninterest expense increased by $1.7 million, or 6%, from $29.0 million during the fourth quarter of 2023.

    On a linked quarter basis, noninterest expense increased by $260,000, or 1%, from $30.4 million during the third quarter of 2024. Driving the increase in noninterest expense was an increase in salaries and employee benefits of $785,000, or 5% primarily due to performance-based incentive compensation. Corporate and business development expense decreased by $419,000, or 31%, which was driven by a reduction in advertising expense during the quarter. Other expense decreased by $132,000, or 5%.

    The company’s efficiency ratio for the twelve months ended December 31, 2024 was 49.3% compared to 52.9% for the twelve months ended December 31, 2023. The company’s adjusted core efficiency ratio, a non-GAAP financial measure that excludes the impact of certain non-routine operating events, was 49.5% for the twelve months ended December 31, 2024 as compared to 47.4% for the twelve months ended December 31, 2023.

    The company’s efficiency ratio was 48.2% for the fourth quarter of 2024, compared to 44.7% for the fourth quarter of 2023 and 49.7% for the linked third quarter of 2024. The company’s adjusted core efficiency ratio was 48.7% for the fourth quarter of 2023 and unchanged when compared to the company’s efficiency ratio for the third and fourth quarters of 2024.

    Information regarding Lakeland Financial Corporation may be accessed on the home page of its subsidiary, Lake City Bank, at lakecitybank.com. The company’s common stock is traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under “LKFN.” Lake City Bank, a $6.7 billion bank headquartered in Warsaw, Indiana, was founded in 1872 and serves Central and Northern Indiana communities with 54 branch offices and a robust digital banking platform. Lake City Bank’s community banking model prioritizes building in-market long-term customer relationships while delivering technology-forward solutions for retail and commercial clients.

    This document contains, and future oral and written statements of the company and its management may contain, forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 with respect to the financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance and business of the company. Forward-looking statements, which may be based upon beliefs, expectations and assumptions of the company’s management and on information currently available to management, are generally identifiable by the use of words such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “continue,” “plan,” “intend,” “estimate,” “may,” “will,” “would,” “could,” “should” or other similar expressions. The company’s ability to predict results or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain and, accordingly, the reader is cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements made by the company. Additionally, all statements in this document, including forward-looking statements, speak only as of the date they are made, and the company undertakes no obligation to update any statement in light of new information or future events. Numerous factors could cause the company’s actual results to differ from those reflected in forward-looking statements, including the effects of economic, business and market conditions and changes, particularly in our Indiana market area, including prevailing interest rates and the rate of inflation; governmental monetary and fiscal policies; the risks of changes in interest rates on the levels, composition and costs of deposits, loan demand and the values and liquidity of loan collateral, securities and other interest sensitive assets and liabilities; and changes in borrowers’ credit risks and payment behaviors, as well as those identified in the company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K and Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q.

     
    LAKELAND FINANCIAL CORPORATION
    FOURTH QUARTER 2024 FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
           
      Three Months Ended   Twelve Months Ended
    (Unaudited – Dollars in thousands, except per share data) December 31,   September 30,   December 31,   December 31,   December 31,
    END OF PERIOD BALANCES 2024   2024   2023   2024   2023
    Assets $ 6,678,374     $ 6,645,371     $ 6,524,029     $ 6,678,374     $ 6,524,029  
    Investments   1,122,994       1,147,806       1,181,646       1,122,994       1,181,646  
    Loans   5,117,948       5,081,990       4,916,534       5,117,948       4,916,534  
    Allowance for Credit Losses   85,960       83,627       71,972       85,960       71,972  
    Deposits   5,900,966       5,837,313       5,720,525       5,900,966       5,720,525  
    Brokered Deposits   41,560       96,504       135,405       41,560       135,405  
    Core Deposits (1)   5,859,406       5,740,809       5,585,120       5,859,406       5,585,120  
    Total Equity   683,911       699,181       649,793       683,911       649,793  
    Goodwill Net of Deferred Tax Assets   3,803       3,803       3,803       3,803       3,803  
    Tangible Common Equity (2)   680,108       695,378       645,990       680,108       645,990  
    Adjusted Tangible Common Equity (2)   846,040       832,813       800,450       846,040       800,450  
    AVERAGE BALANCES                  
    Total Assets $ 6,795,596     $ 6,656,464     $ 6,514,430     $ 6,662,718     $ 6,464,980  
    Earning Assets   6,470,920       6,329,287       6,145,937       6,328,498       6,114,225  
    Investments   1,134,011       1,128,705       1,107,862       1,134,979       1,184,659  
    Loans   5,086,614       5,064,348       4,879,695       5,039,406       4,813,678  
    Total Deposits   6,011,122       5,880,177       5,802,592       5,836,025       5,604,228  
    Interest Bearing Deposits   4,729,201       4,635,993       4,428,140       4,578,219       4,128,922  
    Interest Bearing Liabilities   4,729,206       4,649,745       4,441,425       4,644,553       4,295,743  
    Total Equity   693,744       670,160       572,653       662,087       588,667  
    INCOME STATEMENT DATA                  
    Net Interest Income $ 51,694     $ 49,273     $ 48,599     $ 196,679     $ 197,035  
    Net Interest Income-Fully Tax Equivalent   52,804       50,383       49,914       201,363       202,347  
    Provision for Credit Losses   3,691       3,059       300       16,750       5,850  
    Noninterest Income   11,876       11,917       17,208       56,844       49,858  
    Noninterest Expense   30,653       30,393       29,445       125,084       130,710  
    Net Income   24,190       23,338       29,626       93,478       93,767  
    Pretax Pre-Provision Earnings (2)   32,917       30,797       36,362       128,439       116,183  
    PER SHARE DATA                  
    Basic Net Income Per Common Share $ 0.94     $ 0.91     $ 1.16     $ 3.64     $ 3.67  
    Diluted Net Income Per Common Share   0.94       0.91       1.16       3.63       3.65  
    Cash Dividends Declared Per Common Share   0.48       0.48       0.46       1.92       1.84  
    Dividend Payout   51.06 %     52.75 %     39.66 %     52.89 %     50.41 %
    Book Value Per Common Share (equity per share issued) $ 26.62     $ 27.22     $ 25.37     $ 26.62     $ 25.37  
    Tangible Book Value Per Common Share (2)   26.47       27.07       25.22       26.47       25.22  
    Market Value – High $ 78.61     $ 72.25     $ 67.88     $ 78.61     $ 77.07  
    Market Value – Low   61.10       57.45       45.59       57.45       43.05  
                                           
                                           
      Three Months Ended   Twelve Months Ended
    (Unaudited – Dollars in thousands, except per share data) December 31,   September 30,   December 31,   December 31,   December 31,
    PER SHARE DATA (continued) 2024   2024   2023   2024   2023
    Basic Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding   25,686,276       25,684,407       25,614,420       25,676,543       25,604,751  
    Diluted Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding   25,792,460       25,767,739       25,732,870       25,769,018       25,723,165  
    KEY RATIOS                  
    Return on Average Assets   1.42 %     1.39 %     1.80 %     1.40 %     1.45 %
    Return on Average Total Equity   13.87       13.85       20.52       14.12       15.93  
    Average Equity to Average Assets   10.21       10.07       8.79       9.94       9.11  
    Net Interest Margin   3.25       3.16       3.23       3.18       3.31  
    Efficiency  (Noninterest Expense/Net Interest Income plus Noninterest Income)   48.22       49.67       44.74       49.34       52.94  
    Loans to Deposits   86.73       87.06       85.95       86.73       85.95  
    Investment Securities to Total Assets   16.82       17.27       18.11       16.82       18.11  
    Tier 1 Leverage (3)   12.15       12.18       11.82       12.15       11.82  
    Tier 1 Risk-Based Capital (3)   14.64       14.50       14.21       14.64       14.21  
    Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) (3)   14.64       14.50       14.21       14.64       14.21  
    Total Capital (3)   15.90       15.75       15.47       15.90       15.47  
    Tangible Capital (2)   10.19       10.47       9.91       10.19       9.91  
    Adjusted Tangible Capital (2)   12.37       12.29       11.99       12.37       11.99  
    ASSET QUALITY                  
    Loans Past Due 30 – 89 Days $ 4,273     $ 829     $ 3,360     $ 4,273     $ 3,360  
    Loans Past Due 90 Days or More   28       95       27       28       27  
    Nonaccrual Loans   56,431       57,551       15,687       56,431       15,687  
    Nonperforming Loans   56,459       57,646       15,714       56,459       15,714  
    Other Real Estate Owned   284       384       384       284       384  
    Other Nonperforming Assets   143       21       8       143       8  
    Total Nonperforming Assets   56,886       58,051       16,106       56,886       16,106  
    Individually Analyzed Loans   78,647       77,654       16,124       78,647       16,124  
    Non-Individually Analyzed Watch List Loans   132,499       189,918       166,961       132,499       166,961  
    Total Individually Analyzed and Watch List Loans   211,146       267,572       183,085       211,146       183,085  
    Gross Charge Offs   1,657       231       566       3,468       7,332  
    Recoveries   299       88       133       706       848  
    Net Charge Offs/(Recoveries)   1,358       143       433       2,762       6,484  
    Net Charge Offs/(Recoveries) to Average Loans   0.11 %     0.01 %     0.04 %     0.05 %     0.13 %
    Credit Loss Reserve to Loans   1.68       1.65       1.46       1.68       1.46  
    Credit Loss Reserve to Nonperforming Loans   152.25       145.07       458.01       152.25       458.01  
    Nonperforming Loans to Loans   1.10       1.13       0.32       1.10       0.32  
    Nonperforming Assets to Assets   0.85       0.87       0.25       0.85       0.25  
    Total Individually Analyzed and Watch List Loans to Total Loans   4.13 %     5.27 %     3.72 %     4.13 %     3.72 %
                       
                       
      Three Months Ended   Twelve Months Ended
    (Unaudited – Dollars in thousands, except per share data) December 31,   September 30,   December 31,   December 31,   December 31,
    PER SHARE DATA (continued) 2024   2024   2023   2024   2023
    OTHER DATA                  
    Full Time Equivalent Employees   643       639       619       643       619  
    Offices   54       54       53       54       53  

    ________________________________________________________________
    (1)  Core deposits equals deposits less brokered deposits.
    (2)  Non-GAAP financial measure – see “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures”.
    (3)  Capital ratios for December 31, 2024 are preliminary until the Call Report is filed.

     
    CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (in thousands, except share data)
     
    ​ December 31,
    2024
      December 31,
    2023
    ​ (Unaudited)   ​
    ASSETS      
    Cash and due from banks $ 71,733     $ 70,451  
    Short-term investments   96,472       81,373  
    Total cash and cash equivalents   168,205       151,824  
    ​      
    Securities available-for-sale, at fair value   991,426       1,051,728  
    Securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost (fair value of $113,107 and $119,215, respectively)   131,568       129,918  
    Real estate mortgage loans held-for-sale   1,700       1,158  
    ​      
    Loans, net of allowance for credit losses of $85,960 and $71,972   5,031,988       4,844,562  
    ​      
    Land, premises and equipment, net   60,489       57,899  
    Bank owned life insurance   113,320       109,114  
    Federal Reserve and Federal Home Loan Bank stock   21,420       21,420  
    Accrued interest receivable   28,446       30,011  
    Goodwill   4,970       4,970  
    Other assets   124,842       121,425  
    Total assets $ 6,678,374     $ 6,524,029  
    ​      
    ​      
    LIABILITIES      
    Noninterest bearing deposits $ 1,297,456     $ 1,353,477  
    Interest bearing deposits   4,603,510       4,367,048  
    Total deposits   5,900,966       5,720,525  
           
    Borrowings – Federal Home Loan Bank advances   0       50,000  
    Accrued interest payable   15,117       20,893  
    Other liabilities   78,380       82,818  
    Total liabilities   5,994,463       5,874,236  
    ​      
    STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY      
    Common stock: 90,000,000 shares authorized, no par value      
    25,978,831 shares issued and 25,509,592 outstanding as of December 31, 2024      
    25,903,686 shares issued and 25,430,566 outstanding as of December 31, 2023   129,664       127,692  
    Retained earnings   736,412       692,760  
    Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)   (166,500 )     (155,195 )
    Treasury stock, at cost (469,239 shares and 473,120 shares as of December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, respectively)   (15,754 )     (15,553 )
    Total stockholders’ equity   683,822       649,704  
    Noncontrolling interest   89       89  
    Total equity   683,911       649,793  
    Total liabilities and equity $ 6,678,374     $ 6,524,029  
                   
     
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (unaudited – in thousands, except share and per share data)
     
    ​ Three Months Ended December 31,   Twelve Months Ended December 31,
    ​ 2024
      2023   2024   2023
    NET INTEREST INCOME              
    Interest and fees on loans              
    Taxable $ 83,253     $ 80,631     $ 335,639     $ 304,130  
    Tax exempt   296       1,016       2,126       3,885  
    Interest and dividends on securities              
    Taxable   2,997       3,187       12,048       13,153  
    Tax exempt   3,914       4,009       15,714       16,396  
    Other interest income   2,910       2,099       7,631       5,703  
    Total interest income   93,370       90,942       373,158       343,267  
    ​ ​   ​   ​   ​
    Interest on deposits   41,676       42,154       172,759       137,791  
    Interest on short-term borrowings   0       189       3,720       8,441  
    Total interest expense   41,676       42,343       176,479       146,232  
    ​ ​   ​   ​   ​
    NET INTEREST INCOME   51,694       48,599       196,679       197,035  
    ​ ​   ​   ​   ​
    Provision for credit losses   3,691       300       16,750       5,850  
    ​ ​   ​   ​   ​
    NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION FOR CREDIT LOSSES   48,003       48,299       179,929       191,185  
    ​ ​   ​   ​   ​
    NONINTEREST INCOME              
    Wealth advisory fees   2,699       2,311       10,469       9,080  
    Investment brokerage fees   456       445       1,894       1,815  
    Service charges on deposit accounts   2,825       2,682       11,157       10,773  
    Loan and service fees   2,977       2,968       11,832       11,750  
    Merchant and interchange fee income   889       907       3,542       3,651  
    Bank owned life insurance income   1,216       740       4,210       3,133  
    Interest rate swap fee income   0       0       0       794  
    Mortgage banking income (loss)   48       (70 )     116       (254 )
    Net securities gains (losses)   0       (9 )     (46 )     (25 )
    Net gain on Visa shares   0       0       8,996       0  
    Other income   766       7,234       4,674       9,141  
    Total noninterest income   11,876       17,208       56,844       49,858  
    ​ ​   ​   ​   ​
    NONINTEREST EXPENSE              
    Salaries and employee benefits   17,261       15,733       66,728       59,147  
    Net occupancy expense   1,706       1,486       6,865       6,360  
    Equipment costs   1,405       1,443       5,612       5,632  
    Data processing fees and supplies   3,742       3,698       15,161       14,003  
    Corporate and business development   950       877       4,965       4,807  
    FDIC insurance and other regulatory fees   894       894       3,465       3,363  
    Professional fees   2,275       2,299       8,950       8,583  
    Wire fraud loss   0       0       0       18,058  
    Other expense   2,420       3,015       13,338       10,757  
    Total noninterest expense   30,653       29,445       125,084       130,710  
    ​ ​   ​   ​   ​
    INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX EXPENSE   29,226       36,062       111,689       110,333  
    Income tax expense   5,036       6,436       18,211       16,566  
    NET INCOME $ 24,190     $ 29,626     $ 93,478     $ 93,767  
    ​ ​   ​   ​   ​
    BASIC WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES   25,686,276       25,614,420       25,676,543       25,604,751  
    ​ ​   ​   ​   ​
    BASIC EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE $ 0.94     $ 1.16     $ 3.64     $ 3.67  
    ​              
    DILUTED WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES   25,792,460       25,732,870       25,769,018       25,723,165  
    ​              
    DILUTED EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE $ 0.94     $ 1.16     $ 3.63     $ 3.65  
                                   
     
    LAKELAND FINANCIAL CORPORATION
    LOAN DETAIL
    (unaudited, in thousands)
               
      December 31,
    2024
      September 30,
    2024
      December 31,
    2023
    Commercial and industrial loans:                      
    Working capital lines of credit loans $ 649,609     12.7 %   $ 678,079     13.3 %   $ 604,893     12.3 %
    Non-working capital loans   801,256     15.6       814,804     16.0       815,871     16.6  
    Total commercial and industrial loans   1,450,865     28.3       1,492,883     29.3       1,420,764     28.9  
              ​            
    Commercial real estate and multi-family residential loans:                      
    Construction and land development loans   567,781     11.1       729,293     14.3       634,435     12.9  
    Owner occupied loans   807,090     15.8       810,453     15.9       825,464     16.8  
    Nonowner occupied loans   872,671     17.0       766,821     15.1       724,101     14.7  
    Multifamily loans   344,978     6.7       243,283     4.8       253,534     5.1  
    Total commercial real estate and multi-family residential loans   2,592,520     50.6       2,549,850     50.1       2,437,534     49.5  
              ​            
    Agri-business and agricultural loans:                      
    Loans secured by farmland   156,609     3.1       157,413     3.1       162,890     3.3  
    Loans for agricultural production   230,787     4.5       200,971     4.0       225,874     4.6  
    Total agri-business and agricultural loans   387,396     7.6       358,384     7.1       388,764     7.9  
              ​            
    Other commercial loans   95,584     1.9       94,309     1.9       120,726     2.5  
    Total commercial loans   4,526,365     88.4       4,495,426     88.4       4,367,788     88.8  
              ​            
    Consumer 1-4 family mortgage loans:                      
    Closed end first mortgage loans   259,286     5.1       261,462     5.1       258,103     5.2  
    Open end and junior lien loans   214,125     4.2       210,275     4.1       189,663     3.9  
    Residential construction and land development loans   16,818     0.3       14,200     0.3       8,421     0.2  
    Total consumer 1-4 family mortgage loans   490,229     9.6       485,937     9.5       456,187     9.3  
      ​       ​            
    Other consumer loans   104,041     2.0       103,547     2.1       96,022     1.9  
    Total consumer loans   594,270     11.6       589,484     11.6       552,209     11.2  
    Subtotal   5,120,635     100.0 %     5,084,910     100.0 %     4,919,997     100.0 %
    Less:  Allowance for credit losses   (85,960 )         (83,627 )   ​     (71,972 )   ​
    Net deferred loan fees   (2,687 )         (2,920 )   ​     (3,463 )   ​
    Loans, net $ 5,031,988         $ 4,998,363     ​   $ 4,844,562     ​
                                       
     
    LAKELAND FINANCIAL CORPORATION
    DEPOSITS AND BORROWINGS
    (unaudited, in thousands)
               
      December 31,
    2024
      September 30,
    2024
      December 31,
    2023
    Noninterest bearing demand deposits $ 1,297,456     $ 1,284,527     $ 1,353,477  
    Savings and transaction accounts:          
    Savings deposits   276,179       276,468       301,168  
    Interest bearing demand deposits   3,471,455       3,273,405       3,049,059  
    Time deposits:          
    Deposits of $100,000 or more   642,776       787,095       792,738  
    Other time deposits   213,100       215,818       224,083  
    Total deposits $ 5,900,966     $ 5,837,313     $ 5,720,525  
    FHLB advances and other borrowings   0       30,000       50,000  
    Total funding sources $ 5,900,966     $ 5,867,313     $ 5,770,525  
                           
     
    LAKELAND FINANCIAL CORPORATION
    AVERAGE BALANCE SHEET AND NET INTEREST ANALYSIS
    (UNAUDITED)
                 
        Three Months Ended December 31, 2024   Three Months Ended September 30, 2024   Three Months Ended December 31, 2023
    (fully tax equivalent basis, dollars in thousands)   Average Balance   Interest Income   Yield (1)/
    Rate
      Average Balance   Interest Income   Yield (1)/
    Rate
      Average Balance   Interest Income   Yield (1)/
    Rate
    Earning Assets                                    
    Loans:                                    
    Taxable (2)(3)   $ 5,060,397     $ 83,253     6.54 %   $ 5,037,855     $ 86,118     6.80 %   $ 4,820,389     $ 80,631     6.64 %
    Tax exempt (1)     26,217       364     5.52       26,493       366     5.50       59,306       1,265     8.46  
    Investments: (1)                                    
    Securities     1,134,011       7,953     2.79       1,128,705       7,871     2.77       1,107,862       8,262     2.96  
    Short-term investments     2,765       29     4.17       2,841       35     4.90       2,610       32     4.86  
    Interest bearing deposits     247,530       2,881     4.63       133,393       1,738     5.18       155,770       2,067     5.26  
    Total earning assets   $ 6,470,920     $ 94,480     5.81 %   $ 6,329,287     $ 96,128     6.04 %   $ 6,145,937     $ 92,257     5.96 %
    Less:  Allowance for credit losses     (84,687 )             (81,353 )             (72,165 )        
    Nonearning Assets                                    
    Cash and due from banks     67,994               63,744               69,563          
    Premises and equipment     60,325               59,493               58,436          
    Other nonearning assets     281,044               285,293               312,659          
    Total assets   $ 6,795,596             $ 6,656,464             $ 6,514,430          
                                         
    Interest Bearing Liabilities                                    
    Savings deposits   $ 274,960     $ 43     0.06 %   $ 280,180     $ 45     0.06 %   $ 306,875     $ 52     0.07 %
    Interest bearing checking accounts     3,505,470       31,562     3.58       3,295,911       33,822     4.08       3,073,570       30,953     4.00  
    Time deposits:                                    
    In denominations under $100,000     214,429       1,921     3.56       215,020       1,914     3.54       220,678       1,810     3.25  
    In denominations over $100,000     734,342       8,150     4.42       844,882       9,775     4.60       827,017       9,339     4.48  
    Miscellaneous short-term borrowings     5       0     5.30       13,752       189     5.48       13,285       189     5.64  
    Total interest bearing liabilities   $ 4,729,206     $ 41,676     3.51 %   $ 4,649,745     $ 45,745     3.91 %   $ 4,441,425     $ 42,343     3.78 %
    Noninterest Bearing Liabilities                                    
    Demand deposits     1,281,921               1,244,184               1,374,452          
    Other liabilities     90,725               92,375               125,900          
    Stockholders’ Equity     693,744               670,160               572,653          
    Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity   $ 6,795,596             $ 6,656,464             $ 6,514,430          
    Interest Margin Recap                                    
    Interest income/average earning assets         94,480     5.81 %         96,128     6.04 %         92,257     5.96 %
    Interest expense/average earning assets         41,676     2.56           45,745     2.88           42,343     2.73  
    Net interest income and margin       $ 52,804     3.25 %       $ 50,383     3.16 %       $ 49,914     3.23 %
                                                           

    (1)  Tax exempt income was converted to a fully taxable equivalent basis at a 21 percent tax rate. The tax equivalent rate for tax exempt loans and tax exempt securities acquired after January 1, 1983, included the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 (“TEFRA”) adjustment applicable to nondeductible interest expenses. Taxable equivalent basis adjustments were $1.11 million, $1.11 million and $1.32 million in the three-month periods ended December 31, 2024, September 30, 2024, and December 31, 2023, respectively.
    (2)  Loan fees, which are immaterial in relation to total taxable loan interest income for the three months ended December 31, 2024, September 30, 2024, and December 31, 2023, are included as taxable loan interest income.
    (3)  Nonaccrual loans are included in the average balance of taxable loans.

    Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures

    Tangible common equity, adjusted tangible common equity, tangible assets, adjusted tangible assets, tangible book value per common share, tangible common equity to tangible assets, adjusted tangible common equity to adjusted tangible assets, and pretax pre-provision earnings are non-GAAP financial measures calculated based on GAAP amounts. Tangible common equity is calculated by excluding the balance of goodwill and other intangible assets from the calculation of equity, net of deferred tax. Tangible assets are calculated by excluding the balance of goodwill and other intangible assets from the calculation of total assets, net of deferred tax. Adjusted tangible assets and adjusted tangible common equity remove the fair market value adjustment impact of the available-for-sale investment securities portfolio in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (“AOCI”). Tangible book value per common share is calculated by dividing tangible common equity by the number of shares outstanding less true treasury stock. Pretax pre-provision earnings is calculated by adding net interest income to noninterest income and subtracting noninterest expense. Because not all companies use the same calculation of tangible common equity and tangible assets, this presentation may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures calculated by other companies. However, management considers these measures of the company’s value meaningful to understanding of the company’s financial information and performance.

    A reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures is provided below (dollars in thousands, except per share data).

      Three Months Ended   Twelve Months Ended
      Dec. 31, 2024   Sep. 30, 2024   Dec. 31, 2023   Dec. 31, 2024   Dec. 31, 2023
    Total Equity $ 683,911     $ 699,181     $ 649,793     $ 683,911     $ 649,793  
    Less: Goodwill   (4,970 )     (4,970 )     (4,970 )     (4,970 )     (4,970 )
    Plus: DTA Related to Goodwill   1,167       1,167       1,167       1,167       1,167  
    Tangible Common Equity   680,108       695,378       645,990       680,108       645,990  
    Market Value Adjustment in AOCI   165,932       137,435       154,460       165,932       154,460  
    Adjusted Tangible Common Equity   846,040       832,813       800,450       846,040       800,450  
                       
    Assets $ 6,678,374     $ 6,645,371     $ 6,524,029     $ 6,678,374     $ 6,524,029  
    Less: Goodwill   (4,970 )     (4,970 )     (4,970 )     (4,970 )     (4,970 )
    Plus: DTA Related to Goodwill   1,167       1,167       1,167       1,167       1,167  
    Tangible Assets   6,674,571       6,641,568       6,520,226       6,674,571       6,520,226  
    Market Value Adjustment in AOCI   165,932       137,435       154,460       165,932       154,460  
    Adjusted Tangible Assets   6,840,503       6,779,003       6,674,686       6,840,503       6,674,686  
                       
    Ending Common Shares Issued   25,689,730       25,684,916       25,614,585       25,689,730       25,614,585  
                       
    Tangible Book Value Per Common Share $ 26.47     $ 27.07     $ 25.22     $ 26.47     $ 25.22  
                       
    Tangible Common Equity/Tangible Assets   10.19 %     10.47 %     9.91 %     10.19 %     9.91 %
    Adjusted Tangible Common Equity/Adjusted Tangible Assets   12.37 %     12.29 %     11.99 %     12.37 %     11.99 %
                       
    Net Interest Income $ 51,694     $ 49,273     $ 48,599     $ 196,679     $ 197,035  
    Plus:  Noninterest Income   11,876       11,917       17,208       56,844       49,858  
    Minus:  Noninterest Expense   (30,653 )     (30,393 )     (29,445 )     (125,084 )     (130,710 )
                       
    Pretax Pre-Provision Earnings $ 32,917     $ 30,797     $ 36,362     $ 128,439     $ 116,183  
                                           

    Adjusted core noninterest income, adjusted core noninterest expense, adjusted earnings before income taxes, core operational profitability, core operational diluted earnings per common share and adjusted core efficiency ratio are non-GAAP financial measures calculated based on GAAP amounts. These adjusted amounts are calculated by excluding the impact of the net gain on Visa shares, legal accrual, and wire fraud loss and associated insurance and loss recoveries and adjustments to salaries and employee benefits expense for the periods presented below. Management considers these measures of financial performance to be meaningful to understanding the company’s core business performance for these periods.

    A reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures is provided below (dollars in thousands, except per share data).

      Three Months Ended   Twelve Months Ended
      Dec. 31, 2024   Sep. 30, 2024   Dec. 31, 2023   Dec. 31, 2024   Dec. 31, 2023
    Noninterest Income $ 11,876     $ 11,917     $ 17,208     $ 56,844     $ 49,858  
    Less: Net (Gain) Loss on Visa Shares   0       15       0       (8,996 )     0  
    Less: Insurance and Loss Recoveries   0       0       (6,300 )     (1,000 )     (6,300 )
    Adjusted Core Noninterest Income $ 11,876     $ 11,932     $ 10,908     $ 46,848     $ 43,558  
                       
    Noninterest Expense $ 30,653     $ 30,393     $ 29,445     $ 125,084     $ 130,710  
    Less: Legal Accrual   0       0       0       (4,537 )     0  
    Less: Wire Fraud Loss   0       0       0       0       (18,058 )
    Plus: Salaries and Employee Benefits (1)   0       0       (453 )     0       1,397  
    Adjusted Core Noninterest Expense $ 30,653     $ 30,393     $ 28,992     $ 120,547     $ 114,049  
                       
    Earnings Before Income Taxes $ 29,226     $ 27,738     $ 36,062     $ 111,689     $ 110,333  
    Adjusted Core Impact:                  
    Noninterest Income   0       15       (6,300 )     (9,996 )     (6,300 )
    Noninterest Expense   0       0       453       4,537       16,661  
    Total Adjusted Core Impact   0       15       (5,847 )     (5,459 )     10,361  
    Adjusted Earnings Before Income Taxes   29,226       27,753       30,215       106,230       120,694  
    Tax Effect   (5,036 )     (4,404 )     (4,996 )     (16,853 )     (19,119 )
    Core Operational Profitability (2) $ 24,190     $ 23,349     $ 25,219     $ 89,377     $ 101,575  
                       
    Diluted Earnings Per Common Share $ 0.94     $ 0.91     $ 1.16     $ 3.63     $ 3.65  
    Impact of Adjusted Core Items   0.00       0.00       (0.18 )     (0.16 )     0.30  
    Core Operational Diluted Earnings Per Common Share $ 0.94     $ 0.91     $ 0.98     $ 3.47     $ 3.95  
                       
    Adjusted Core Efficiency Ratio   48.22 %     49.66 %     48.72 %     49.49 %     47.40 %
                                           

    (1)  In 2023, long-term, incentive-based compensation accruals were reduced as a result of the wire fraud loss and associated insurance and loss recoveries.
    (2)  Core operational profitability was $11,000 higher and $4.4 million lower than reported net income for the three months ended September 30, 2024 and December 31, 2023, respectively. Core operational profitability was $4.1 million lower and $7.8 million higher than reported net income for the twelve months ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.

    Contact
    Lisa M. O’Neill
    Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
    (574) 267-9125
    lisa.oneill@lakecitybank.com

    The MIL Network –

    January 25, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: RYVYL Executes Repurchase and Repayment Agreement with Securityholder to Retire All Outstanding Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and Outstanding Balance of 8% Senior Convertible Note

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    SAN DIEGO, CA, Jan. 24, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — RYVYL Inc. (NASDAQ: RVYL) (“RYVYL” or the “Company”), a leading innovator of payment transaction solutions leveraging electronic payment technology for diverse international markets, has executed a Preferred Stock Repurchase and Note Repayment Agreement for the full repayment and termination of an 8% Senior Convertible Note (the “Note) and the redemption of all shares of the Company’s Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Preferred Stock”). The Definitive Agreement provides for:

    • A first tranche payment of $13.0 million for the redemption of all of the shares of Preferred Stock held by the Securityholder, and payment of a portion of the outstanding balance of the Note so that the remaining outstanding principal balance will be $4.0 million.
    • Advancing the maturity date for the remaining balance of $4.0 million due under the Note, following payment of the first tranche, to April 30, 2025.

    The Company is required to pay the first tranche payment of $13.0 million on or before January 27, 2025. The first tranche due date may be extended to February 3, 2025, at the sole option of the Company, in consideration for RYVYL’s payment of an additional $50,000.

    • Upon payment of the first tranche payment and execution of the Preferred Stock Repurchase and Note Repayment Agreement, certain restrictive covenants contained in the transaction documents pursuant to which the Note and the shares of Preferred Stock were issued will be waived and no additional interest will accrue and be payable, as long as the Company pays the remaining $4.0 million principal balance of the Note ($4,050,000, if the date of the first tranche payment date is extended) on or before April 30, 2025. If the Company fails to pay the remaining balance by such date, the Note will be restored to its terms prior to the first tranche payment, and interest will again accrue and be payable.
    • Prior to payment of the first tranche payment, the Securityholder shall retain the ability, subject to certain market limitations, to convert the Note and the Preferred Stock into common stock.

    This communication is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, any security and does not constitute an offer, solicitation or sale of any security in any jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful.

    About RYVYL

    RYVYL Inc. (NASDAQ: RVYL) was born from a passion for empowering a new way to conduct business-to-business, consumer-to-business, and peer-to-peer payment transactions around the globe. By leveraging electronic payment technology for diverse international markets, RYVYL is a leading innovator of payment transaction solutions reinventing the future of financial transactions. Since its founding as GreenBox POS in 2017 in San Diego, RYVYL has developed applications enabling an end-to-end suite of turnkey financial products with enhanced security and data privacy, world-class identity theft protection, and rapid speed to settlement. As a result, the platform can log immense volumes of immutable transactional records at the speed of the internet for first-tier partners, merchants, and consumers around the globe. http://www.ryvyl.com

    Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

    This press release includes information that constitutes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These forward-looking statements are based on the Company’s current beliefs, assumptions, and expectations regarding future events, which in turn are based on information currently available to the Company. Such forward-looking statements include statements regarding timely payment of the first and second tranches, the benefit to stockholders from the repayment of the note and repurchase of the preferred shares, and the timing and expectation of revenues from the license described herein and are charactered by future or conditional words such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate” and “continue” or similar words. You should read statements that contain these words carefully because they discuss future expectations and plans, which contain projections of future results of operations or financial condition or state other forward-looking information. By their nature, forward-looking statements address matters that are subject to risks and uncertainties. A variety of factors could cause actual events and results to differ materially from those expressed in or contemplated by the forward-looking statements, including the risk that the licensee understands and complies with various banking laws and regulations that may impact the licensee’s ability to process transactions. For example, federal money laundering statutes and Bank Secrecy Act regulations discourage financial institutions from working with operators of certain industries – particularly industries with heightened cash reporting obligations and restrictions – as a result of which, banks may refuse to process certain payments and/or require onerous reporting obligations by payment processors to avoid compliance risk. These and other risk factors affecting the Company are discussed in detail in the Company’s periodic filings with the SEC. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether because of the latest information, future events or otherwise, except to the extent required by applicable laws.

    IR Contact:
    David Barnard, Alliance Advisors Investor Relations, 415-433-3777, ryvylinvestor@allianceadvisors.com

    The MIL Network –

    January 25, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Economics: RBI imposes monetary penalty on Datson Exports Ltd., West Bengal

    Source: Reserve Bank of India

    The Reserve Bank of India (RBl) has, by an order dated January 15, 2025, imposed a monetary penalty of ₹1.00 lakh (Rupees One lakh only) on Datson Exports Ltd., West Bengal (the company) for non-compliance with certain directions issued by RBI on ‘Managing Risks and Code of Conduct in Outsourcing of Financial Services by NBFCs’. This penalty has been imposed in exercise of powers conferred on RBI under the provisions of Section 58 G(1)(b) read with Section 58B(5)(aa) of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934.

    The statutory inspection of the company was conducted with reference to its financial position as on March 31, 2023. Based on supervisory findings of non-compliance with RBI directions and related correspondence in that regard, a notice was issued to the company advising it to show cause as to why penalty should not be imposed on it for its failure to comply with the said directions. After considering the company’s reply to the notice and oral submissions made during the personal hearing, RBI found, inter alia, that the following charge against the company was sustained, warranting imposition of monetary penalty:

    The company had outsourced one of its decision-making functions, viz., sanction of loans, to its Digital Lending Application (DLA) partner.

    This action is based on deficiencies in regulatory compliance and is not intended to pronounce upon the validity of any transaction or agreement entered into by the company with its customers. Further, imposition of this monetary penalty is without prejudice to any other action that may be initiated by RBI against the company.

    (Puneet Pancholy)  
    Chief General Manager

    Press Release: 2024-2025/1999

    MIL OSI Economics –

    January 25, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Economics: Reserve Bank of India imposes monetary penalty on Jammu and Kashmir Bank Limited

    Source: Reserve Bank of India

    The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has, by an order dated January 14, 2025, imposed a monetary penalty of ₹3,31,80,000 (Rupees Three crore thirty one lakh eighty thousand only) on Jammu and Kashmir Bank Limited (the bank) for non-compliance with certain directions issued by RBI on ‘Financial Inclusion – Access to Banking Services – Basic Savings Bank Deposit Account (BSBDA)’, ‘Know Your Customer’ and ‘Loans and Advances – Statutory and Other Restrictions’. This penalty has been imposed in exercise of powers conferred on RBI under the provisions of Section 47 A(1)(c) read with Section 46(4)(i) of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949.

    The Statutory Inspection for Supervisory Evaluation of the bank was conducted by RBI with reference to its financial position as on March 31, 2022 and March 31, 2023. Based on supervisory findings of non-compliance with RBI directions and related correspondence in that regard, a notice was issued to the bank advising it to show cause as to why penalty should not be imposed on it for its failure to comply with the said RBI directions.

    After considering the bank’s reply to the notice and oral submissions made during the personal hearing, RBI found, inter alia, that the following charges against the bank were sustained, warranting imposition of monetary penalty:

    1. The bank allowed certain BSBDA holders to also open Savings Bank Deposit Accounts;

    2. The bank did not identify beneficial owner for opening accounts of certain Legal Persons, who were not natural persons;

    3. The bank allowed operations in certain small accounts that did not meet the regulatory requirements; and

    4. The bank sanctioned a working capital demand loan to a Corporation against amounts receivable by way of subsidies from Government.

    The action is based on deficiencies in statutory and regulatory compliance and is not intended to pronounce upon the validity of any transaction or agreement entered into by the bank with its customers. Further, imposition of monetary penalty is without prejudice to any other action that may be initiated by RBI against the bank.

    (Puneet Pancholy)  
    Chief General Manager

    Press Release: 2024-2025/2000

    MIL OSI Economics –

    January 25, 2025
←Previous Page
1 … 1,369 1,370 1,371 1,372 1,373 … 1,544
Next Page→
NewzIntel.com

NewzIntel.com

MIL Open Source Intelligence

  • Blog
  • About
  • FAQs
  • Authors
  • Events
  • Shop
  • Patterns
  • Themes

Twenty Twenty-Five

Designed with WordPress