Category: Economy

  • MIL-OSI: Synchronoss Technologies Announces First Quarter 2025 Earnings Call Date

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    BRIDGEWATER, N.J., April 22, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Synchronoss Technologies Inc. (“Synchronoss” or the “Company”) (Nasdaq: SNCR), a global leader and innovator in Personal Cloud platforms, will hold a conference call on Tuesday, May 6, 2025 at 4:30 p.m. Eastern time (1:30 p.m. Pacific time) to discuss its financial results for the first quarter ended March 31, 2025. Financial results will be issued in a press release prior to the call.

    Synchronoss management will host the presentation, followed by a question-and-answer period.

    Date: Tuesday, May 6, 2025
    Time: 4:30 p.m. Eastern time (1:30 p.m. Pacific time)
    Dial-In Number: 877-451-6152 (domestic) or 201-389-0879 (international)
    Conference ID: 13753247

    The conference call will be broadcast live here and via the Investor Relations section of Synchronoss’ website.

    About Synchronoss
    Synchronoss Technologies (Nasdaq: SNCR), a global leader in personal Cloud solutions, empowers service providers to establish secure and meaningful connections with their subscribers. Our SaaS Cloud platform simplifies onboarding processes and fosters subscriber engagement, resulting in enhanced revenue streams, reduced expenses, and faster time-to-market. Millions of subscribers trust Synchronoss to safeguard their most cherished memories and important digital content. Explore how our Cloud-focused solutions redefine the way you connect with your digital world at www.synchronoss.com.

    Media Relations Contact:
    Domenick Cilea
    Springboard
    dcilea@springboardpr.com

    Investor Relations Contact:
    Ryan Gardella
    ICR for Synchronoss
    SNCRIR@icrinc.com

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: Western New England Bancorp, Inc. Reports Results for Three Months Ended March 31, 2025 and Declares Quarterly Cash Dividend

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    WESTFIELD, Mass., April 22, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Western New England Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company” or “WNEB”) (NasdaqGS: WNEB), the holding company for Westfield Bank (the “Bank”), announced today the unaudited results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2025. The Company reported net income of $2.3 million, or $0.11 per diluted share, for the three months ended March 31, 2025, compared to net income of $3.0 million, or $0.14 per diluted share, for the three months ended March 31, 2024. On a linked quarter basis, net income was $2.3 million, or $0.11 per diluted share, compared to net income of $3.3 million, or $0.16 per diluted share, for the three months ended December 31, 2024.

    The Company also announced that its Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.07 per share on the Company’s common stock. The dividend will be payable on or about May 21, 2025 to shareholders of record on May 7, 2025.

    In addition, the Company announced that its Board of Directors authorized a new stock repurchase plan (the “2025 Plan”), pursuant to which the Company may repurchase up to 1.0 million shares of the Company’s common stock, or approximately 4.8% of the Company’s outstanding common stock as of today. The 2025 Plan will commence upon the completion of the Company’s existing share repurchase plan (the “2024 Plan”). The 2024 Plan was approved by the Board of Directors on May 21, 2024, and as of March 31, 2025, there were 265,609 shares of common stock available for repurchase under the 2024 Plan.

    James C. Hagan, President and Chief Executive Officer, commented, “I am pleased to report the results for the first quarter of 2025. Our strong, diversified core deposit base and our disciplined approach to managing our funding costs have resulted in an increase in net interest income for the third consecutive quarter. The net interest margin increased eight basis points to 2.49% compared to the preceding quarter. We will continue to proactively manage our funding costs and benefit from our liability sensitive balance sheet to support net interest margin growth. In the first quarter, core deposits increased $70.2 million, or 4.5%, and represented 70.0% of total deposits while the loan-to-deposit ratio decreased to 89.3%. During the same period, average funding costs decreased four basis points.

    “We continue to focus on extending credit within our markets and servicing the needs of our existing customer base while ensuring new opportunities present the appropriate levels of risk and return. Consistent with our prudent credit culture, we continue to proactively identify and manage credit risk within the loan portfolio. Our asset quality remains strong, with nonaccrual loans at 0.29% of total loans as of March 31, 2025.

    “The Company is considered to be well-capitalized, as defined by regulators and internal Company targets, and we remain disciplined in our capital management strategies. We continue to believe that buying back shares represents a valuable use of the Company’s capital. Today, we announced the 2025 Plan, which will commence upon the completion of the 2024 Plan. Our stock repurchase programs are an integral element of our capital management strategies. As such, we believe that repurchasing common stock enhances shareholder value. We are pleased to be able to continue to return value to shareholders through share repurchases.”

    Hagan concluded, “Our commitment to strong capital and liquidity levels gives us a solid foundation to take advantage of opportunities in the markets we serve and to enhance shareholder value in the long term.”

    Key Highlights:

    Loans and Deposits

    Total gross loans increased $9.3 million, or 0.4%, from $2.1 billion, or 77.9% of total assets, at December 31, 2024 to $2.1 billion, or 76.7% of total assets, at March 31, 2025. The increase in total gross loans was primarily driven by an increase in residential real estate loans, including home equity loans, of $8.1 million, or 1.0%, and an increase in commercial and industrial loans of $4.7 million, or 2.2%. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in commercial real estate loans of $3.0 million, or 0.3%, and a decrease in consumer loans of $526,000, or 12.0%.

    At March 31, 2025, total deposits of $2.3 billion increased $66.0 million, or 2.9%, from December 31, 2024. Core deposits, which the Company defines as all deposits except time deposits, increased $70.2 million, or 4.5%, from $1.6 billion, or 68.9% of total deposits, at December 31, 2024, to $1.6 billion, or 70.0% of total deposits, at March 31, 2025. Time deposits decreased $4.3 million, or 0.6%, from $703.6 million at December 31, 2024 to $699.3 million at March 31, 2025. Brokered time deposits, which are included in time deposits, totaled $1.7 million at March 31, 2025 and at December 31, 2024. The loan-to-deposit ratio decreased from 91.5% at December 31, 2024 to 89.3% at March 31, 2025.

    Liquidity

    The Company’s liquidity position remains strong with solid core deposit relationships, cash, unencumbered securities, a diversified deposit base and access to diversified borrowing sources. At March 31, 2025, the Company had $1.1 billion in immediately available liquidity, compared to $665.6 million in uninsured deposits, or 28.6% of total deposits, representing a coverage ratio of 171.5%.

    Uninsured deposits of the Bank’s customers are eligible for FDIC pass-through insurance if the customer opens an IntraFi Insured Cash Sweep account or a reciprocal time deposit through the Certificate of Deposit Account Registry System. IntraFi allows for up to $250.0 million per customer of pass-through FDIC insurance, which would more than cover each of the Bank’s deposit customers if such customer desired to have such pass-through insurance.

    Allowance for Credit Losses and Credit Quality

    At March 31, 2025, the allowance for credit losses was $19.7 million, or 0.95% of total loans, compared to $19.5 million, or 0.94% of total loans, at December 31, 2024. The allowance for loan losses, as a percentage of nonaccrual loans, was 327.1% and 362.9% at March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively. At March 31, 2025, nonaccrual loans totaled $6.0 million, or 0.29% of total loans, compared to $5.4 million, or 0.26% of total loans, at December 31, 2024. Total delinquent loans decreased from $5.0 million, or 0.24% of total loans, at December 31, 2024 to $4.5 million, or 0.22% of total loans, at March 31, 2025. At March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, the Company did not have any other real estate owned.

    Net Interest Margin

    The net interest margin increased eight basis points from 2.41% for the three months ended December 31, 2024 to 2.49% for the three months ended March 31, 2025. The net interest margin, on a tax-equivalent basis, increased eight basis points from 2.43% for the three months ended December 31, 2024, compared to 2.51% for the three months ended March 31, 2025.

    Stock Repurchase Program

    On May 21, 2024, the Board of Directors authorized the 2024 Plan under which the Company may repurchase up to 1.0 million shares of its common stock, or approximately 4.6%, of the Company’s then-outstanding shares of common stock. During the three months ended March 31, 2025, the Company repurchased 206,709 shares of common stock under the 2024 Plan, with an average price per share of $9.12. As of March 31, 2025, there were 265,609 shares of common stock available for repurchase under the 2024 Plan.

    On April 22, 2025, the Board of Directors authorized the 2025 Plan, pursuant to which the Company may repurchase up to 1.0 million shares of common stock, or approximately 4.8% of the Company’s outstanding shares as of the date the 2025 Plan was announced. Repurchases under the 2025 Plan will commence upon the completion of the 2024 Plan.

    The repurchase of shares under the stock repurchase program is administered through an independent broker. The shares of common stock repurchased under both the 2024 Plan and the 2025 Plan have been and will continue to be, as applicable, purchased from time to time at prevailing market prices, through open market or privately negotiated transactions, or otherwise, depending upon market conditions. There is no guarantee as to the exact number, or value, of shares that will be repurchased by the Company, and the Company may discontinue repurchases at any time that the Company’s management (“Management”) determines additional repurchases are not warranted. The timing and amount of additional share repurchases under both the 2024 Plan and the 2025 Plan will depend on a number of factors, including the Company’s stock price performance, ongoing capital planning considerations, general market conditions, and applicable legal requirements.

    Book Value and Tangible Book Value

    At March 31, 2025, the Company’s book value per share was $11.44, compared to $11.30 at December 31, 2024, while tangible book value per share, a non-GAAP financial measure, increased $0.15, or 1.4%, from $10.63 at December 31, 2024 to $10.78 at March 31, 2025. See pages 16-17 for the related tangible book value calculation and a reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures.

    Net Income for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2025 Compared to the Three Months Ended December 31, 2024.

    For the three months ended March 31, 2025, the Company reported a decrease in net income of $985,000, or 30.0%, from $3.3 million, or $0.16 per diluted share, for the three months ended December 31, 2024, to $2.3 million, or $0.11 per diluted share. Net interest income increased $261,000, or 1.7%, the provision for credit losses increased $904,000, non-interest income decreased $495,000, or 15.2%, and non-interest expense increased $258,000, or 1.7%. Return on average assets and return on average equity were 0.35% and 3.94%, respectively, for the three months ended March 31, 2025, compared to 0.49% and 5.48%, respectively, for the three months ended December 31, 2024.

    Net Interest Income and Net Interest Margin

    On a sequential quarter basis, net interest income, our primary driver of revenues, increased $261,000, or 1.7%, to $15.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025, from $15.3 million for the three months ended December 31, 2024. The increase in net interest income was primarily due to a decrease in interest expense of $410,000, or 3.1%, partially offset by a decrease in interest income of $149,000, or 0.5%.

    The net interest margin increased eight basis points from 2.41% for the three months ended December 31, 2024 to 2.49% for the three months ended March 31, 2025. The net interest margin, on a tax-equivalent basis, increased eight basis points from 2.43% for the three months ended December 31, 2024, compared to 2.51% for the three months ended March 31, 2025.

    The average yield on interest-earning assets, without the impact of tax-equivalent adjustments, was 4.56% for the three months ended March 31, 2025, compared to 4.52% for the three months ended December 31, 2024. The average loan yield, without the impact of tax-equivalent adjustments, was 4.89% for the three months ended March 31, 2025, compared to 4.86% for the three months ended December 31, 2024. During the three months ended March 31, 2025, average interest-earning assets increased $12.7 million, or 0.5% to $2.5 billion, primarily due to an increase in average loans of $10.7 million, or 0.5%, and an increase in average securities of $3.9 million, or 1.1%.

    The average cost of total funds, including non-interest bearing accounts and borrowings, decreased four basis points from 2.20% for the three months ended December 31, 2024 to 2.16% for the three months ended March 31, 2025. The average cost of core deposits, which the Company defines as all deposits except time deposits, increased 10 basis points to 1.08% for the three months ended March 31, 2025, from 0.98% for the three months ended December 31, 2024. The average cost of time deposits decreased 20 basis points from 4.31% for the three months ended December 31, 2024, to 4.11% for the three months ended March 31, 2025. The average cost of borrowings, including subordinated debt, was 5.04% for the three months ended December 31, 2024 and for the three months ended March 31, 2025. Average demand deposits, an interest-free source of funds, decreased $9.6 million, or 1.6%, from $579.2 million, or 25.6% of total average deposits, for the three months ended December 31, 2024, to $569.6 million, or 24.8% of total average deposits, for the three months ended March 31, 2025.

    Provision for (Reversal of) Credit Losses

    During the three months ended March 31, 2025, the Company recorded a provision for credit losses of $142,000, compared to a reversal of credit losses of $762,000 during the three months ended December 31, 2024. The increase was primarily due to changes in the most recent macroeconomic forecast. The provision for credit losses was also determined by a number of factors: the continued strong credit performance of the Company’s loan portfolio, changes in the loan portfolio mix and Management’s consideration of existing economic conditions. Management will continue to monitor macroeconomic variables related to the interest rate environment, changing tariff policies and concerns of an economic downturn. Management believes it is appropriately reserved for the current economic environment.

    During the three months ended March 31, 2025, the Company recorded net charge-offs of $29,000, compared to net recoveries of $128,000 for the three months ended December 31, 2024.

    Non-Interest Income

    On a sequential quarter basis, non-interest income decreased $495,000, or 15.2%, to $2.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025, from $3.3 million for the three months ended December 31, 2024. During the three months ended March 31, 2025, service charges and fees on deposits decreased $17,000, or 0.7%, to $2.3 million from the three months ended December 31, 2024. Income from bank-owned life insurance (“BOLI”) decreased $13,000, or 2.7%, from the three months ended December 31, 2024 to $473,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2025. During the three months ended March 31, 2025, the Company reported a gain of $7,000 from mortgage banking activities, compared to a loss of $11,000 during the three months ended December 31, 2024. During the three months ended March 31, 2025, the Company reported unrealized losses on marketable equity securities of $5,000, compared to unrealized losses of $9,000, during the three months ended December 31, 2024. During the three months ended December 31, 2024, the Company reported gains on non-marketable equity investments of $300,000 and did not have comparable income during the three months ended March 31, 2025. During the three months ended December 31, 2024, the Company reported $187,000 in other income from loan-level swap fees on commercial loans and did not have comparable income during the three months ended March 31, 2025.

    Non-Interest Expense

    For the three months ended March 31, 2025, non-interest expense increased $258,000, or 1.7%, to $15.2 million from $14.9 million for the three months ended December 31, 2024. Occupancy expense increased $156,000, or 12.4%, primarily due to snow removal costs of $143,000. Advertising expense increased $119,000, or 38.4%, professional fees increased $75,000, or 15.9%, FDIC insurance expense increased $42,000, or 10.8%, and software related expenses increased $17,000, or 2.6%. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in furniture and equipment expense of $18,000, or 3.6%, a decrease in data processing expense of $18,000, or 2.0%, a decrease in debit card processing and ATM network costs of $16,000, or 2.7%, a decrease in salaries and related benefits of $16,000, or 0.2%, and a decrease in other non-interest expense of $83,000, or 5.8%.

    For the three months ended March 31, 2025 and the three months ended December 31, 2024, the efficiency ratio was 83.0% and 80.6%, respectively. For the three months ended March 31, 2025, the adjusted efficiency ratio, a non-GAAP financial measure, was 83.0% compared to 81.9% for the three months ended December 31, 2024. The increases in the efficiency ratio and the adjusted efficiency ratio were driven by higher expenses and lower non-interest income during the three months ended March 31, 2025 compared to the three months ended December 31, 2024. The Company’s detailed reconciliation between the non-GAAP measure and the comparable GAAP amount are included at the end of this document. See pages 16-17 for the related adjusted efficiency ratio calculation and a reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures.

    Income Tax Provision

    Income tax expense for the three months ended March 31, 2025 was $664,000, with an effective tax rate of 22.4%, compared to $1.1 million, with an effective tax rate of 24.6%, for the three months ended December 31, 2024.

    Net Income for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2025 Compared to the Three Months Ended March 31, 2024.

    The Company reported net income of $2.3 million, or $0.11 per diluted share, for the three months ended March 31, 2025, compared to net income of $3.0 million, or $0.14 per diluted share, for the three months ended March 31, 2024. Net interest income increased $188,000, or 1.2%, provision for credit losses increased $692,000, non-interest income increased $85,000, or 3.2%, and non-interest expense increased $402,000, or 2.7%, during the same period. Return on average assets and return on average equity were 0.35% and 3.94%, respectively, for the three months ended March 31, 2025, compared to 0.47% and 5.04%, respectively, for the three months ended March 31, 2024.

    Net Interest Income and Net Interest Margin

    Net interest income increased $188,000, or 1.2%, to $15.5 million, for the three months ended March 31, 2025, from $15.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2024. The increase in net interest income was due to an increase in interest and dividend income of $1.8 million, or 6.9%, partially offset by an increase in interest expense of $1.6 million, or 14.6%. The increase in interest expense was primarily due to an increase in average interest-bearing deposits of $156.1 million, or 9.9%, and an increase in the average cost of interest-bearing deposit accounts of 29 basis points from the three months ended March 31, 2024 to the three months ended March 31, 2025. As a result, the net interest margin decreased from 2.57% for the three months ended March 31, 2024, to 2.49% for the three months ended March 31, 2025. The net interest margin, on a tax-equivalent basis, was 2.51% for the three months ended March 31, 2025, compared to 2.59% for the three months ended March 31, 2024.

    The average yield on interest-earning assets, without the impact of tax-equivalent adjustments, increased 11 basis points from 4.45% for the three months ended March 31, 2024 to 4.56% for the three months ended March 31, 2025. The average loan yield, without the impact of tax-equivalent adjustments, was 4.89% for the three months ended March 31, 2025, compared to 4.82% for the three months ended March 31, 2024. During the three months ended March 31, 2025, average interest-earning assets increased $126.6 million, or 5.3%, to $2.5 billion, primarily due to an increase in average loans of $51.8 million, or 2.6%, an increase in average short-term investments, consisting of cash and cash equivalents, of $66.7 million, an increase in average securities of $5.9 million, or 1.6%, and an increase in average other investments of $2.3 million, or 18.6%.

    The average cost of total funds, including non-interest bearing accounts and borrowings, increased 19 basis points from 1.97% for the three months ended March 31, 2024, to 2.16% for the three months ended March 31, 2025. The average cost of core deposits, which the Company defines as all deposits except time deposits, increased 32 basis points from 0.76% for the three months ended March 31, 2024 to 1.08% for the three months ended March 31, 2025. The average cost of time deposits decreased one basis point from 4.12% for the three months ended March 31, 2024 to 4.11% for the three months ended March 31, 2025. The average cost of borrowings, including subordinated debt, increased 13 basis points from 4.91% for the three months ended March 31, 2024 to 5.04% for the three months ended March 31, 2025. Average demand deposits, an interest-free source of funds, increased $11.9 million, or 2.1%, from $557.7 million, or 26.1% of total average deposits, for the three months ended March 31, 2024, to $569.6 million, or 24.8% of total average deposits, for the three months ended March 31, 2025.

    Provision for (Reversal of) Credit Losses

    During the three months ended March 31, 2025, the Company recorded a provision for credit losses of $142,000, compared to a reversal of credit losses of $550,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2024. The increase was primarily due to changes in the most recent macroeconomic forecast. The provision for credit losses was also determined by a number of factors: the continued strong credit performance of the Company’s loan portfolio, changes in the loan portfolio mix and Management’s consideration of existing economic conditions. Management will continue to monitor macroeconomic variables related to the interest rate environment, the continued discussion on tariffs and the concerns of an economic downturn. Management believes it is appropriately reserved for the current economic environment.

    During the three months ended March 31, 2025, the Company recorded net charge-offs of $29,000, compared to net recoveries of $67,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2024.

    Non-Interest Income

    Non-interest income increased $85,000, or 3.2%, from $2.7 million, for the three months ended March 31, 2024 to $2.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025, primarily due to a $65,000, or 2.9%, increase in service charges and fees and an increase in income from BOLI of $20,000, or 4.4%.

    Non-Interest Expense

    Non-interest expense increased $402,000, or 2.7%, from $14.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2024 to $15.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025. Salaries and benefits increased $169,000, or 2.0%, advertising expense increased $80,000, or 22.9%, occupancy expense increased $49,000, or 3.6%, debit card processing and ATM network costs increased $25,000, or 4.5%, FDIC insurance expense increased $21,000, or 5.1%, data processing expense increased $20,000, or 2.3%, furniture and equipment expense increased $3,000, or 0.6%, and other non-interest expense increased $98,000, or 7.8%. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in software related expenses of $40,000, or 5.7%, and a decrease in professional fees of $23,000, or 4.0%.

    For the three months ended March 31, 2025 and the three months ended March 31, 2024, the efficiency ratio was 83.0% and 82.0%, respectively. For the three months ended March 31, 2025, the adjusted efficiency ratio, a non-GAAP financial measure, was 83.0% compared to 82.0% for the three months ended March 31, 2024. The increases in the efficiency ratio and the adjusted efficiency ratio were driven by higher expenses during the three months ended March 31, 2025 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2024. See pages 16-17 for the efficiency ratio calculation and a reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures.

    Income Tax Provision

    For the three months ended March 31, 2025, income tax expense was $664,000, with an effective tax rate of 22.4%, compared to $827,000, with an effective tax rate of 21.8%, for the three months ended March 31, 2024.

    Balance Sheet

    At March 31, 2025, total assets were $2.7 billion, an increase of $56.2 million, or 2.1%, from December 31, 2024. The increase in total assets was primarily due to an increase in total gross loans of $9.3 million, or 0.4%, an increase in cash and cash equivalents of $44.1 million, or 66.4%, and an increase in investment securities of $3.6 million, or 1.0%.

    Investments

    At March 31, 2025, the investment securities portfolio totaled $369.8 million, or 13.6% of total assets, compared to $366.1 million, or 13.8% of total assets, at December 31, 2024. At March 31, 2025, the Company’s available-for-sale securities portfolio, recorded at fair market value, increased $7.1 million, or 4.4%, from $160.7 million at December 31, 2024 to $167.8 million. The held-to-maturity securities portfolio, recorded at amortized cost, decreased $3.4 million, or 1.7%, from $205.0 million at December 31, 2024 to $201.6 million at March 31, 2025.

    At March 31, 2025, the Company reported unrealized losses on the available-for-sale securities portfolio of $27.8 million, or 14.2% of the amortized cost basis of the available-for-sale securities portfolio, compared to unrealized losses of $31.2 million, or 16.2% of the amortized cost basis of the available-for-sale securities at December 31, 2024. At March 31, 2025, the Company reported unrealized losses on the held-to-maturity securities portfolio of $35.8 million, or 17.8% of the amortized cost basis of the held-to-maturity securities portfolio, compared to $39.4 million, or 19.2% of the amortized cost basis of the held-to-maturity securities portfolio at December 31, 2024.

    The securities in which the Company may invest are limited by regulation. Federally chartered savings banks have authority to invest in various types of assets, including U.S. Treasury obligations, securities of various government-sponsored enterprises, mortgage-backed securities, certain certificates of deposit of insured financial institutions, repurchase agreements, overnight and short-term loans to other banks, corporate debt instruments and marketable equity securities. The securities, with the exception of $8.7 million in corporate bonds, are issued by the United States government or government-sponsored enterprises and are therefore either explicitly or implicitly guaranteed as to the timely payment of contractual principal and interest. These positions are deemed to have no credit impairment, therefore, the disclosed unrealized losses with the securities portfolio relate primarily to changes in prevailing interest rates. In all cases, price improvement in future periods will be realized as the issuances approach maturity.

    Management regularly reviews the portfolio for securities in an unrealized loss position. At March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, the Company did not record any credit impairment charges on its securities portfolio and attributed the unrealized losses primarily due to fluctuations in general interest rates or changes in expected prepayments and not due to credit quality. The primary objective of the Company’s investment portfolio is to provide liquidity and to secure municipal deposit accounts while preserving the safety of principal. The available-for-sale and held-to-maturity portfolios are both eligible for pledging to the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) as collateral for borrowings. The portfolios are comprised of high-credit quality investments and both portfolios generated cash flows monthly from interest, principal amortization and payoffs, which support’s the Bank’s objective to provide liquidity.

    Total Loans

    Total gross loans increased $9.3 million, or 0.4%, from $2.1 billion, or 77.9% of total assets, at December 31, 2024 to $2.1 billion, or 76.7% of total assets, at March 31, 2025. The increase in total gross loans was primarily driven by an increase in residential real estate loans, including home equity loans, of $8.1 million, or 1.0%, and an increase in commercial and industrial loans of $4.7 million, or 2.2%. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in commercial real estate loans of $3.0 million, or 0.3%, and a decrease in consumer loans of $526,000, or 12.0%.

    The following table presents a summary of the loan portfolio by the major classification of loans at the periods indicated:

      March 31, 2025   December 31, 2024
      (Dollars in thousands)
       
    Commercial real estate loans:      
    Non-owner occupied $ 881,105     $ 880,828  
    Owner-occupied   191,582       194,904  
    Total commercial real estate loans   1,072,687       1,075,732  
           
    Residential real estate loans:      
    Residential   659,984       653,802  
    Home equity   123,804       121,857  
    Total residential real estate loans   783,788       775,659  
           
    Commercial and industrial loans   216,368       211,656  
           
    Consumer loans   3,865       4,391  
    Total gross loans   2,076,708       2,067,438  
    Unamortized premiums and net deferred loans fees and costs   2,853       2,751  
    Total loans $ 2,079,561     $ 2,070,189  
                   

    Credit Quality

    Management continues to closely monitor the loan portfolio for any signs of deterioration in borrowers’ financial condition and also in light of speculation that commercial real estate values may deteriorate as the market continues to adjust to higher vacancies and interest rates. We continue to proactively take steps to mitigate risk in our loan portfolio.

    Total delinquency was $4.5 million, or 0.22% of total loans, at March 31, 2025, compared to $5.0 million, or 0.24% of total loans at December 31, 2024. At March 31, 2025, nonaccrual loans totaled $6.0 million, or 0.29% of total loans, compared to $5.4 million, or 0.26% of total loans, at December 31, 2024. At March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, there were no loans 90 or more days past due and still accruing interest. Total nonaccrual assets totaled $6.0 million, or 0.22% of total assets, at March 31, 2025, compared to $5.4 million, or 0.20% of total assets, at December 31, 2024. At March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, the Company did not have any other real estate owned.

    At March 31, 2025, the allowance for credit losses was $19.7 million, or 0.95% of total loans and 327.1% of nonaccrual loans, compared to $19.5 million, or 0.94% of total loans and 362.9% of nonaccrual loans, at December 31, 2024. Total criticized loans, defined as special mention and substandard loans, decreased $2.1 million, or 5.5%, from $38.4 million, or 1.9% of total loans, at December 31, 2024 to $36.3 million, or 1.7% of total loans, at March 31, 2025.

    Our commercial real estate portfolio is comprised of diversified property types and primarily within our geographic footprint. At March 31, 2025, the commercial real estate portfolio totaled $1.1 billion, and represented 51.7% of total loans. Of the $1.1 billion, $881.1 million, or 82.1%, was categorized as non-owner occupied commercial real estate and represented 325.8% of the Bank’s total risk-based capital. More details on the diversification of the loan portfolio are available in the supplementary earnings presentation.

    Deposits

    At March 31, 2025, total deposits were $2.3 billion and increased $66.0 million, or 2.9%, from December 31, 2024. Core deposits, which the Company defines as all deposits except time deposits, increased $70.2 million, or 4.5%, from $1.6 billion, or 68.9% of total deposits, at December 31, 2024, to $1.6 billion, or 70.0% of total deposits, at March 31, 2025. Non-interest-bearing deposits increased $24.4 million, or 4.3%, to $590.0 million, and represent 25.3% of total deposits, money market accounts increased $45.7 million, or 6.9%, to $707.2 million, savings accounts increased $9.8 million, or 5.4%, to $191.4 million and interest-bearing checking accounts decreased $9.6 million, or 6.4%, to $140.8 million.

    Time deposits decreased $4.3 million, or 0.6%, from $703.6 million at December 31, 2024 to $699.3 million at March 31, 2025. Brokered time deposits, which are included in time deposits, totaled $1.7 million at March 31, 2025 and at December 31, 2024. The Company has experienced growth and movement in both money market accounts and non-interest-bearing deposits as a result of seasonal customer behaviors, relationship pricing, and the current interest rate environment, as opposed to time deposit specials or interest rate adjustments. We continue our disciplined and focused approach to core relationship management and customer outreach to meet funding requirements and liquidity needs, with an emphasis on retaining a long-term core customer relationship base by competing for and retaining deposits in our local market. At March 31, 2025, the Bank’s uninsured deposits totaled $665.6 million, or 28.6% of total deposits, compared to $643.6 million, or 28.4% of total deposits, at December 31, 2024.

    The table below is a summary of our deposit balances for the periods noted:

        March 31, 2025   December 31, 2024   March 31, 2024
        (Dollars in thousands)
    Core Deposits:            
    Demand accounts   $ 589,996     $ 565,620     $ 559,928  
    Interest-bearing accounts     140,769       150,348       125,377  
    Savings accounts     191,398       181,618       190,732  
    Money market accounts     707,153       661,478       624,474  
    Total Core Deposits   $ 1,629,316     $ 1,559,064     $ 1,500,511  
    Time Deposits:     699,277       703,583       643,236  
    Total Deposits:   $ 2,328,593     $ 2,262,647     $ 2,143,747  
                             

    FHLB and Subordinated Debt

    At March 31, 2025, total borrowings decreased $860,000, or 0.7%, from $123.1 million at December 31, 2024 to $122.3 million. At March 31, 2025, short-term borrowings decreased $870,000, or 16.1%, to $4.5 million, compared to $5.4 million at December 31, 2024. Long-term borrowings were $98.0 million at March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024. At March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, borrowings also consisted of $19.8 million in fixed-to-floating rate subordinated notes.

    As of March 31, 2025, the Company had $447.5 million of additional borrowing capacity at the FHLB, $378.5 million of additional borrowing capacity under the Federal Reserve Bank Discount Window and $25.0 million of other unsecured lines of credit with correspondent banks.

    Capital

    At March 31, 2025, shareholders’ equity was $237.7 million, or 8.8% of total assets, compared to $235.9 million, or 8.9% of total assets, at December 31, 2024. The change was primarily attributable to a decrease in accumulated other comprehensive loss of $2.6 million, cash dividends paid of $1.4 million, repurchase of shares at a cost of $2.0 million, partially offset by net income of $2.3 million. At March 31, 2025, total shares outstanding were 20,774,319. The Company’s regulatory capital ratios continue to be strong and in excess of regulatory minimum requirements to be considered well-capitalized as defined by regulators and internal Company targets.

      March 31, 2025   December 31, 2024
      Company   Bank   Company   Bank
    Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) 14.28 %   13.56 %   14.38 %   13.65 %
    Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) 12.27 %   12.55 %   12.37 %   12.64 %
    Common Equity Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) 12.27 %   12.55 %   12.37 %   12.64 %
    Tier 1 Leverage Ratio (to Adjusted Average Assets) 9.06 %   9.26 %   9.14 %   9.34 %
                           

    Dividends

    Although the Company has historically paid quarterly dividends on its common stock and currently intends to continue to pay such dividends, the Company’s ability to pay such dividends depends on a number of factors, including restrictions under federal laws and regulations on the Company’s ability to pay dividends, and as a result, there can be no assurance that dividends will continue to be paid in the future.

    About Western New England Bancorp, Inc.

    Western New England Bancorp, Inc. is a Massachusetts-chartered stock holding company and the parent company of Westfield Bank, CSB Colts, Inc., Elm Street Securities Corporation, WFD Securities, Inc. and WB Real Estate Holdings, LLC. Western New England Bancorp, Inc. and its subsidiaries are headquartered in Westfield, Massachusetts and operate 25 banking offices throughout western Massachusetts and northern Connecticut. To learn more, visit our website at www.westfieldbank.com.

    Forward-Looking Statements

    This press release contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, with respect to the Company’s financial condition, liquidity, results of operations, future performance, and business. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of such words as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “should,” “planned,” “estimated,” and “potential.”  Examples of forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, estimates with respect to our financial condition, results of operations and business that are subject to various factors which could cause actual results to differ materially from these estimates.  These factors include, but are not limited to:

    • unpredictable changes in general economic or political conditions, financial markets, fiscal, monetary and regulatory policies, including actual or potential stress in the banking industry;
    • the duration and scope of potential pandemics, including the emergence of new variants and the response thereto;
    • unstable political and economic conditions, including changes in tariff policies, which could materially impact credit quality trends and the ability to generate loans and gather deposits;
    • inflation and governmental responses to inflation, including recent sustained increases and potential future increases in interest rates that reduce margins;
    • the effect on our operations of governmental legislation and regulation, including changes in accounting regulation or standards, the nature and timing of the adoption and effectiveness of new requirements under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, Basel guidelines, capital requirements and other applicable laws and regulations;
    • significant changes in accounting, tax or regulatory practices or requirements;
    • new legal obligations or liabilities or unfavorable resolutions of litigation;
    • disruptive technologies in payment systems and other services traditionally provided by banks;
    • the highly competitive industry and market area in which we operate;
    • operational risks or risk management failures by us or critical third parties, including without limitation with respect to data processing, information systems, cybersecurity, technological changes, vendor issues, business interruption, and fraud risks;
    • failure or circumvention of our internal controls or procedures;
    • changes in the securities markets which affect investment management revenues;
    • increases in Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation deposit insurance premiums and assessments;
    • the soundness of other financial services institutions which may adversely affect our credit risk;
    • certain of our intangible assets may become impaired in the future;
    • new lines of business or new products and services, which may subject us to additional risks;
    • changes in key management personnel which may adversely impact our operations;
    • severe weather, natural disasters, acts of war or terrorism and other external events which could significantly impact our business; and
    • other risk factors detailed from time to time in our SEC filings.

    Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, actual results may differ materially from the results discussed in these forward-looking statements. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. We do not undertake any obligation to republish revised forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, except to the extent required by law.

    WESTERN NEW ENGLAND BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    Consolidated Statements of Net Income and Other Data
    (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
    (Unaudited)
       
      Three Months Ended
      March 31, December 31, September 30, June 30, March 31,
        2025       2024       2024       2024       2024  
    INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME:          
    Loans $ 24,984     $ 25,183     $ 25,134     $ 24,340     $ 24,241  
    Securities   2,422       2,273       2,121       2,141       2,114  
    Other investments   191       214       189       148       136  
    Short-term investments   840       916       396       173       113  
    Total interest and dividend income   28,437       28,586       27,840       26,802       26,604  
               
    INTEREST EXPENSE:          
    Deposits   11,376       11,443       11,165       10,335       9,293  
    Short-term borrowings   54       60       71       186       283  
    Long-term debt   1,219       1,557       1,622       1,557       1,428  
    Subordinated debt   254       253       254       254       254  
    Total interest expense   12,903       13,313       13,112       12,332       11,258  
               
    Net interest and dividend income   15,534       15,273       14,728       14,470       15,346  
               
    PROVISION FOR (REVERSAL OF) CREDIT LOSSES   142       (762 )     941       (294 )     (550 )
               
    Net interest and dividend income after provision for (reversal of) credit losses   15,392       16,035       13,787       14,764       15,896  
               
    NON-INTEREST INCOME:          
    Service charges and fees on deposits   2,284       2,301       2,341       2,341       2,219  
    Income from bank-owned life insurance   473       486       470       502       453  
    Unrealized (loss) gain on marketable equity securities   (5 )     (9 )     10       4       8  
    Gain (loss) on sale of mortgages   7       (11 )     246              
    Gain on non-marketable equity investments         300             987        
    Loss on disposal of premises and equipment                           (6 )
    Other income         187       74              
    Total non-interest income   2,759       3,254       3,141       3,834       2,674  
               
    NON-INTEREST EXPENSE:          
    Salaries and employees’ benefits   8,413       8,429       8,112       7,901       8,244  
    Occupancy   1,412       1,256       1,217       1,218       1,363  
    Furniture and equipment   487       505       483       483       484  
    Data processing   882       900       869       846       862  
    Software   659       642       612       566       699  
    Debit/ATM card processing expense   577       593       649       643       552  
    Professional fees   546       471       540       581       569  
    FDIC insurance   431       389       338       323       410  
    Advertising   429       310       271       339       349  
    Other   1,348       1,431       1,315       1,414       1,250  
    Total non-interest expense   15,184       14,926       14,406       14,314       14,782  
               
    INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES   2,967       4,363       2,522       4,284       3,788  
               
    INCOME TAX PROVISION   664       1,075       618       771       827  
    NET INCOME $ 2,303     $ 3,288     $ 1,904     $ 3,513     $ 2,961  
               
    Basic earnings per share $ 0.11     $ 0.16     $ 0.09     $ 0.17     $ 0.14  
    Weighted average shares outstanding   20,385,481       20,561,749       20,804,162       21,056,173       21,180,968  
    Diluted earnings per share $ 0.11     $ 0.16     $ 0.09     $ 0.17     $ 0.14  
    Weighted average diluted shares outstanding   20,514,098       20,701,276       20,933,833       21,163,762       21,271,323  
               
    Other Data:          
    Return on average assets (1)   0.35 %     0.49 %     0.29 %     0.55 %     0.47 %
    Return on average equity (1)   3.94 %     5.48 %     3.19 %     6.03 %     5.04 %
    Efficiency ratio   83.00 %     80.56 %     80.62 %     78.20 %     82.03 %
    Adjusted efficiency ratio (2)   82.98 %     81.85 %     80.67 %     82.68 %     82.04 %
    Net interest margin   2.49 %     2.41 %     2.40 %     2.42 %     2.57 %
    Net interest margin, on a fully tax-equivalent basis   2.51 %     2.43 %     2.42 %     2.44 %     2.59 %
    (1) Annualized.      
    (2) The adjusted efficiency ratio (non-GAAP) represents the ratio of operating expenses divided by the sum of net interest and dividend income and non-interest income, excluding realized and unrealized gains and losses on securities, gain on non-marketable equity investments, and loss on disposal of premises and equipment.
     
    WESTERN NEW ENGLAND BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    Consolidated Balance Sheets
    (Dollars in thousands)
    (Unaudited)
                       
      March 31,   December 31,   September 30,   June 30,   March 31,
        2025       2024       2024       2024       2024  
    Cash and cash equivalents $ 110,579     $ 66,450     $ 72,802     $ 53,458     $ 22,613  
    Securities available-for-sale, at fair value   167,800       160,704       155,889       135,089       138,362  
    Securities held to maturity, at amortized cost   201,557       205,036       213,266       217,632       221,242  
    Marketable equity securities, at fair value   414       397       252       233       222  
    Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston and other restricted stock – at cost   5,818       5,818       7,143       7,143       3,105  
                       
    Loans   2,079,561       2,070,189       2,049,002       2,026,226       2,025,566  
    Allowance for credit losses   (19,669 )     (19,529 )     (19,955 )     (19,444 )     (19,884 )
    Net loans   2,059,892       2,050,660       2,029,047       2,006,782       2,005,682  
                       
    Bank-owned life insurance   77,529       77,056       76,570       76,100       75,598  
    Goodwill   12,487       12,487       12,487       12,487       12,487  
    Core deposit intangible   1,344       1,438       1,531       1,625       1,719  
    Other assets   71,864       73,044       71,492       75,521       76,206  
    TOTAL ASSETS $ 2,709,284     $ 2,653,090     $ 2,640,479     $ 2,586,070     $ 2,557,236  
                       
    Total deposits $ 2,328,593     $ 2,262,647     $ 2,224,206     $ 2,171,809     $ 2,143,747  
    Short-term borrowings   4,520       5,390       4,390       6,570       11,470  
    Long-term debt   98,000       98,000       128,277       128,277       120,646  
    Subordinated debt   19,761       19,751       19,741       19,731       19,722  
    Securities pending settlement   2,093       8,622       2,513       102        
    Other liabilities   18,641       22,770       20,697       23,104       25,855  
    TOTAL LIABILITIES   2,471,608       2,417,180       2,399,824       2,349,593       2,321,440  
                       
    TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY   237,676       235,910       240,655       236,477       235,796  
    TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY $ 2,709,284     $ 2,653,090     $ 2,640,479     $ 2,586,070     $ 2,557,236  
                       
    WESTERN NEW ENGLAND BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    Other Data
    (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
    (Unaudited)
       
      Three Months Ended
      March 31,   December 31,   September 30,   June 30,   March 31,
        2025       2024       2024       2024       2024  
    Shares outstanding at end of period   20,774,319       20,875,713       21,113,408       21,357,849       21,627,690  
                       
    Operating results:                  
    Net interest income $ 15,534     $ 15,273     $ 14,728     $ 14,470     $ 15,346  
    Provision for (reversal of) credit losses   142       (762 )     941       (294 )     (550 )
    Non-interest income   2,759       3,254       3,141       3,834       2,674  
    Non-interest expense   15,184       14,926       14,406       14,314       14,782  
    Income before income provision for income taxes   2,967       4,363       2,522       4,284       3,788  
    Income tax provision   664       1,075       618       771       827  
    Net income   2,303       3,288       1,904       3,513       2,961  
                       
    Performance Ratios:                  
    Net interest margin   2.49 %     2.41 %     2.40 %     2.42 %     2.57 %
    Net interest margin, on a fully tax-equivalent basis   2.51 %     2.43 %     2.42 %     2.44 %     2.59 %
    Interest rate spread   1.74 %     1.63 %     1.60 %     1.66 %     1.85 %
    Interest rate spread, on a fully tax-equivalent basis   1.76 %     1.65 %     1.62 %     1.67 %     1.86 %
    Return on average assets   0.35 %     0.49 %     0.29 %     0.55 %     0.47 %
    Return on average equity   3.94 %     5.48 %     3.19 %     6.03 %     5.04 %
    Efficiency ratio (GAAP)   83.00 %     80.56 %     80.62 %     78.20 %     82.03 %
    Adjusted efficiency ratio (non-GAAP)(1)   82.98 %     81.85 %     80.67 %     82.68 %     82.04 %
                       
    Per Common Share Data:                  
    Basic earnings per share $ 0.11     $ 0.16     $ 0.09     $ 0.17     $ 0.14  
    Earnings per diluted share   0.11       0.16       0.09       0.17       0.14  
    Cash dividend declared   0.07       0.07       0.07       0.07       0.07  
    Book value per share   11.44       11.30       11.40       11.07       10.90  
    Tangible book value per share (non-GAAP)(2)   10.78       10.63       10.73       10.41       10.25  
                       
    Asset Quality:                  
    30-89 day delinquent loans $ 2,459     $ 3,694     $ 3,059     $ 3,270     $ 3,000  
    90 days or more delinquent loans   2,027       1,301       1,253       2,280       1,716  
    Total delinquent loans   4,486       4,995       4,312       5,550       4,716  
    Total delinquent loans as a percentage of total loans   0.22 %     0.24 %     0.21 %     0.27 %     0.23 %
    Nonaccrual loans $ 6,014     $ 5,381     $ 4,873     $ 5,845     $ 5,837  
    Nonaccrual loans as a percentage of total loans   0.29 %     0.26 %     0.24 %     0.29 %     0.29 %
    Nonaccrual assets as a percentage of total assets   0.22 %     0.20 %     0.18 %     0.23 %     0.23 %
    Allowance for credit losses as a percentage of nonaccrual loans   327.05 %     362.93 %     409.50 %     332.66 %     340.65 %
    Allowance for credit losses as a percentage of total loans   0.95 %     0.94 %     0.97 %     0.96 %     0.98 %
    Net loan charge-offs (recoveries) $ 29     $ (128 )   $ 98     $ 10     $ (67 )
    Net loan charge-offs (recoveries) as a percentage of average loans   0.00 %     (0.01 )%     0.00 %     0.00 %     0.00 %
    (1) The adjusted efficiency ratio (non-GAAP) represents the ratio of operating expenses divided by the sum of net interest and dividend income and non-interest income, excluding realized and unrealized gains and losses on securities, gains on non-marketable equity investments, and loss on disposal of premises and equipment.
    (2) Tangible book value per share (non-GAAP) represents the value of the Company’s tangible assets divided by its current outstanding shares.
                                           

    The following table sets forth the information relating to our average balances and net interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2025, December 31, 2024 and March 31, 2024 and reflects the average yield on interest-earning assets and average cost of interest-bearing liabilities for the periods indicated.

      Three Months Ended
      March 31, 2025   December 31, 2024   March 31, 2024
      Average       Average Yield/   Average       Average Yield/   Average       Average Yield/
      Balance   Interest   Cost(8)   Balance   Interest   Cost(8)   Balance   Interest   Cost(8)
      (Dollars in thousands)
    ASSETS:                                              
    Interest-earning assets                                              
    Loans(1)(2) $ 2,073,486     $ 25,105       4.91 %   $ 2,062,822     $ 25,311       4.88 %   $ 2,021,713     $ 24,351       4.84 %
    Securities(2)   365,371       2,422       2.69       361,476       2,273       2.50       359,493       2,114       2.37  
    Other investments   14,819       191       5.23       15,924       214       5.35       12,494       136       4.38  
    Short-term investments(3)   76,039       840       4.48       76,795       916       4.75       9,386       113       4.84  
    Total interest-earning assets   2,529,715       28,558       4.58       2,517,017       28,714       4.54       2,403,086       26,714       4.47  
    Total non-interest-earning assets   156,733                   155,538                   154,410              
    Total assets $ 2,686,448                 $ 2,672,555                 $ 2,557,496              
                                                   
    LIABILITIES AND EQUITY:                                              
    Interest-bearing liabilities                                              
    Interest-bearing checking accounts $ 140,960       250       0.72     $ 149,231       264       0.70     $ 135,559       234       0.69  
    Savings accounts   183,869       40       0.09       179,122       38       0.08       186,125       39       0.08  
    Money market accounts   704,215       3,968       2.29       654,965       3,553       2.16       626,267       2,587       1.66  
    Time deposit accounts   702,748       7,118       4.11       700,324       7,588       4.31       627,699       6,433       4.12  
    Total interest-bearing deposits   1,731,792       11,376       2.66       1,683,642       11,443       2.70       1,575,650       9,293       2.37  
    Short-term borrowings and long-term debt   122,786       1,527       5.04       147,748       1,870       5.04       160,802       1,965       4.91  
    Interest-bearing liabilities   1,854,578       12,903       2.82       1,831,390       13,313       2.89       1,736,452       11,258       2.61  
    Non-interest-bearing deposits   569,638                   579,168                   557,711              
    Other non-interest-bearing liabilities   25,464                   23,380                   27,078              
    Total non-interest-bearing liabilities   595,102                   602,548                   584,789              
    Total liabilities   2,449,680                   2,433,938                   2,321,241              
    Total equity   236,768                   238,617                   236,255              
    Total liabilities and equity $ 2,686,448                 $ 2,672,555                 $ 2,557,496              
    Less: Tax-equivalent adjustment(2)       (121 )                 (128 )                 (110 )        
    Net interest and dividend income     $ 15,534                 $ 15,273                 $ 15,346          
    Net interest rate spread(4)           1.74 %             1.63 %             1.85 %
    Net interest rate spread, on a tax-equivalent basis(5)           1.76 %             1.65 %             1.86 %
    Net interest margin(6)           2.49 %             2.41 %             2.57 %
    Net interest margin, on a tax-equivalent basis(7)           2.51 %             2.43 %             2.59 %
    Ratio of average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities           136.40 %             137.44 %             138.39 %
    (1) Loans, including nonaccrual loans, are net of deferred loan origination costs and unadvanced funds.
    (2) Loan and securities income are presented on a tax-equivalent basis using a tax rate of 21%. The tax-equivalent adjustment is deducted from tax-equivalent net interest and dividend income to agree to the amount reported on the consolidated statements of net income.
    (3) Short-term investments include federal funds sold.
    (4) Net interest rate spread represents the difference between the weighted average yield on interest-earning assets and the weighted average cost of interest-bearing liabilities.
    (5) Net interest rate spread, on a tax-equivalent basis, represents the difference between the tax-equivalent weighted average yield on interest-earning assets and the tax-equivalent weighted average cost of interest-bearing liabilities.
    (6) Net interest margin represents net interest and dividend income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets.
    (7) Net interest margin, on a tax-equivalent basis, represents tax-equivalent net interest and dividend income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets.
    (8) Annualized.
     
    Reconciliation of Non-GAAP to GAAP Financial Measures
     

    The Company believes that certain non-GAAP financial measures provide information to investors that is useful in understanding its results of operations and financial condition.  Because not all companies use the same calculation, this presentation may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures calculated by other companies.  A reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures is provided below.

      For the quarter ended
      3/31/2025   12/31/2024   9/30/2024   6/30/2024   3/31/2024
      (Dollars in thousands)
                       
    Loan interest (no tax adjustment) $ 24,984     $ 25,183     $ 25,134     $ 24,340     $ 24,241  
    Tax-equivalent adjustment   121       128       119       114       110  
    Loan interest (tax-equivalent basis) $ 25,105     $ 25,311     $ 25,253     $ 24,454     $ 24,351  
                       
    Net interest income (no tax adjustment) $ 15,534     $ 15,273     $ 14,728     $ 14,470     $ 15,346  
    Tax equivalent adjustment   121       128       119       114       110  
    Net interest income (tax-equivalent basis) $ 15,655     $ 15,401     $ 14,847     $ 14,584     $ 15,456  
                       
    Average interest-earning assets $ 2,529,715     $ 2,517,017     $ 2,441,236     $ 2,400,633     $ 2,403,086  
    Net interest margin (no tax adjustment)   2.49 %     2.41 %     2.40 %     2.42 %     2.57 %
    Net interest margin, tax-equivalent   2.51 %     2.43 %     2.42 %     2.44 %     2.59 %
                       
    Book Value per Share (GAAP) $ 11.44     $ 11.30     $ 11.40     $ 11.07     $ 10.90  
    Non-GAAP adjustments:                  
    Goodwill   (0.60 )     (0.60 )     (0.59 )     (0.58 )     (0.58 )
    Core deposit intangible   (0.06 )     (0.07 )     (0.08 )     (0.08 )     (0.07 )
    Tangible Book Value per Share (non-GAAP) $ 10.78     $ 10.63     $ 10.73     $ 10.41     $ 10.25  
                       
      For the quarter ended
      3/31/2025   12/31/2024   9/30/2024   6/30/2024   3/31/2024
      (Dollars in thousands)
                       
    Efficiency Ratio:                  
    Non-interest Expense (GAAP) $ 15,184     $ 14,926     $ 14,406     $ 14,314     $ 14,782  
                       
    Net Interest Income (GAAP) $ 15,534     $ 15,273     $ 14,728     $ 14,470     $ 15,346  
                       
    Non-interest Income (GAAP) $ 2,759     $ 3,254     $ 3,141     $ 3,834     $ 2,674  
    Non-GAAP adjustments:                  
    Unrealized losses (gains) on marketable equity securities   5       9       (10 )     (4 )     (8 )
    Gain on non-marketable equity investments         (300 )           (987 )      
    Loss on disposal of premises and equipment                           6  
    Non-interest Income for Adjusted Efficiency Ratio (non-GAAP) $ 2,764     $ 2,963     $ 3,131     $ 2,843     $ 2,672  
    Total Revenue for Adjusted Efficiency Ratio (non-GAAP) $ 18,298     $ 18,236     $ 17,859     $ 17,313     $ 18,018  
                       
    Efficiency Ratio (GAAP)   83.00 %     80.56 %     80.62 %     78.20 %     82.03 %
                       
    Adjusted Efficiency Ratio (Non-interest Expense (GAAP)/Total Revenue for Adjusted Efficiency Ratio (non-GAAP))   82.98 %     81.85 %     80.67 %     82.68 %     82.04 %
                       

    For further information contact:
    James C. Hagan, President and CEO
    Guida R. Sajdak, Executive Vice President and CFO
    Meghan Hibner, First Vice President and Investor Relations Officer
    413-568-1911

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: Hanmi Reports 2025 First Quarter Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    LOS ANGELES, April 22, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Hanmi Financial Corporation (NASDAQ: HAFC, or “Hanmi”), the parent company of Hanmi Bank (the “Bank”), today reported financial results for the first quarter of 2025.

    Net income for the first quarter of 2025 was $17.7 million, or $0.58 per diluted share, unchanged from the fourth quarter of 2024. The return on average assets for the first quarter of 2025 was 0.94% and the return on average equity was 8.92%, compared with a return on average assets of 0.93% and a return on average equity of 8.89% for the fourth quarter of 2024.

    CEO Commentary
    “Our team delivered strong results in the first quarter with solid operating performance across all of our business lines,” said Bonnie Lee, President and Chief Executive Officer. “We achieved our third consecutive quarter of net interest margin expansion, up 11 basis points to 3.02%, primarily driven by lower funding costs.”

    “Deposits increased 3% driven by new commercial accounts and contributions from our newly opened branches, a testament to our core relationship-based banking model. Loan production was solid, fueled by healthy originations in residential mortgages and our SBA business. Importantly, we maintained our strong credit quality, and continued to effectively manage our operating expenses, resulting in our best quarterly efficiency ratio since the fourth quarter of 2023.”

    “Overall, our first quarter results were well-balanced and reflected continued growth and positive momentum, including the successful opening of a new branch in the Atlanta region. Despite elevated macroeconomic uncertainty, our team’s focus, discipline, and commitment to providing exceptional service and market leading products positions us well to deliver long-term value to our shareholders.”

    First Quarter 2025 Highlights:        

    • First quarter net income was $17.7 million, or $0.58 per diluted share, unchanged from fourth quarter of 2024. Preprovision net revenues increased 5.9% from the prior quarter reflecting growth in net interest income, an expanding net interest margin, a solid contribution from fee-based activities, and disciplined expense management.
    • Loans receivable were $6.28 billion at March 31, 2025, up 0.5% from the end of the fourth quarter of 2024; loan production for the first quarter was $345.9 million, with a weighted average interest rate of 7.35%, compared with loan production for the fourth quarter of $339.0 million, with a weighted average interest rate of 7.37%.
    • Deposits were $6.62 billion at March 31, 2025, up 2.9% from the end of the fourth quarter of 2024; noninterest-bearing demand deposits at March 31, 2025 were 31.2% of total deposits.
    • Net interest income for the first quarter was $55.1 million, up 3.1% from the fourth quarter of 2024. Net interest margin (taxable equivalent) increased 11 basis points to 3.02%; the average yield on loans declined two basis points to 5.95%, while the cost of interest-bearing deposits fell 27 basis points to 3.69%.
    • Credit loss expense for the first quarter was $2.7 million, an increase from $0.9 million for the prior quarter. The allowance for credit losses increased $0.5 million to $70.6 million at March 31, 2025, or 1.12% of loans. For the first quarter, net loan charge-offs were $1.9 million, or 0.13% of average loans (annualized).
    • Nonperforming loans were $35.6 million at March 31, 2025, or 0.57% of loans. Criticized loans decreased to $164.9 million, as special mention loans decreased to $118.4 million, while classified loans increased to $46.5 million.

    For more information about Hanmi, please see the Q1 2025 Investor Update (and Supplemental Financial Information), which is available on the Bank’s website at www.hanmi.com and via a current report on Form 8-K on the website of the Securities and Exchange Commission at www.sec.gov. Also, please refer to “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” herein for further details of the presentation of certain non-GAAP financial measures.

    Quarterly Highlights
    (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

      As of or for the Three Months Ended     Amount Change  
      March 31,     December 31,     September 30,     June 30,     March 31,     Q1-25     Q1-25  
      2025     2024     2024     2024     2024     vs. Q4-24     vs. Q1-24  
                                             
    Net income $ 17,672     $ 17,695     $ 14,892     $ 14,451     $ 15,164     $ (23 )   $ 2,508  
    Net income per diluted common share $ 0.58     $ 0.58     $ 0.49     $ 0.48     $ 0.50     $     $ 0.08  
                                             
    Assets $ 7,729,035     $ 7,677,925     $ 7,712,299     $ 7,586,347     $ 7,512,046     $ 51,110     $ 216,989  
    Loans receivable $ 6,282,189     $ 6,251,377     $ 6,257,744     $ 6,176,359     $ 6,177,840     $ 30,812     $ 104,349  
    Deposits $ 6,619,475     $ 6,435,776     $ 6,403,221     $ 6,329,340     $ 6,376,060     $ 183,699     $ 243,415  
                                             
    Return on average assets   0.94 %     0.93 %     0.79 %     0.77 %     0.81 %     0.01       0.13  
    Return on average stockholders’ equity   8.92 %     8.89 %     7.55 %     7.50 %     7.90 %     0.03       1.02  
                                             
    Net interest margin   3.02 %     2.91 %     2.74 %     2.69 %     2.78 %     0.11       0.24  
    Efficiency ratio (1)   55.69 %     56.79 %     59.98 %     62.24 %     62.42 %     -1.10       -6.73  
                                             
    Tangible common equity to tangible assets (2)   9.59 %     9.41 %     9.42 %     9.19 %     9.23 %     0.18       0.36  
    Tangible common equity per common share (2) $ 24.49     $ 23.88     $ 24.03     $ 22.99     $ 22.86       0.61       1.63  
                                             
                                             
    (1) Noninterest expense divided by net interest income plus noninterest income.                    
    (2) Refer to “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for further details.                    
                         

    Results of Operations
    Net interest income for the first quarter was $55.1 million, up 3.1% from $53.4 million for the fourth quarter of 2024. The increase was primarily due to a decrease in deposit interest expense from a decrease in deposit rates. The average rate paid on interest-bearing deposits for the fourth quarter decreased 27 basis points to 3.69% from 3.96% for the fourth quarter of 2024, primarily due to the decrease in the average cost of time deposits to 4.17% for the first quarter from 4.55% for the fourth quarter of 2024. The average balance of interest-bearing deposits increased to $4.46 billion for the first quarter of 2025 from $4.36 billion for the fourth quarter. The average balance of time deposits was $2.35 billion for the first quarter of 2025, essentially unchanged from the fourth quarter. The average balance of noninterest-bearing deposits for the first quarter decreased to $1.90 billion from $1.97 billion for the fourth quarter of 2024. Net interest margin (taxable equivalent) for the first quarter was 3.02%, up 11 basis points from 2.91% for the fourth quarter of 2024.

      For the Three Months Ended (in thousands)     Percentage Change  
      Mar 31,     Dec 31,     Sep 30,     Jun 30,     Mar 31,     Q1-25     Q1-25  
    Net Interest Income 2025     2024     2024     2024     2024     vs. Q4-24     vs. Q1-24  
                                             
    Interest and fees on loans receivable (1) $ 90,887     $ 91,545     $ 92,182     $ 90,752     $ 91,674     -0.7 %   -0.9 %
    Interest on securities   6,169       5,866       5,523       5,238       4,955     5.2 %   24.5 %
    Dividends on FHLB stock   360       360       356       357       361     0.0 %   -0.3 %
    Interest on deposits in other banks   1,841       2,342       2,356       2,313       2,604     -21.4 %   -29.3 %
    Total interest and dividend income $ 99,257     $ 100,113     $ 100,417     $ 98,660     $ 99,594     -0.9 %   -0.3 %
                                             
    Interest on deposits   40,559       43,406       47,153       46,495       45,638     -6.6 %   -11.1 %
    Interest on borrowings   2,024       1,634       1,561       1,896       1,655     23.9 %   22.3 %
    Interest on subordinated debentures   1,582       1,624       1,652       1,649       1,646     -2.6 %   -3.9 %
    Total interest expense   44,165       46,664       50,366       50,040       48,939     -5.4 %   -9.8 %
    Net interest income $ 55,092     $ 53,449     $ 50,051     $ 48,620     $ 50,655     3.1 %   8.8 %
                                             
    (1) Includes loans held for sale.                    
                                             
      For the Three Months Ended (in thousands)     Percentage Change  
    Average Earning Assets and Interest-bearing Liabilities Mar 31,
    2025
        Dec 31,
    2024
        Sep 30,
    2024
        Jun 30,
    2024
         Mar 31,
    2024
        Q1-25 vs.
    Q4-24
        Q1-25 vs.
    Q1-24
     
    Loans receivable (1) $ 6,189,531     $ 6,103,264     $ 6,112,324     $ 6,089,440     $ 6,137,888     1.4 %   0.8 %
    Securities   1,001,499       998,313       986,041       979,671       969,520     0.3 %   3.3 %
    FHLB stock   16,385       16,385       16,385       16,385       16,385     0.0 %   0.0 %
    Interest-bearing deposits in other banks   176,028       204,408       183,027       180,177       201,724     -13.9 %   -12.7 %
    Average interest-earning assets $ 7,383,443     $ 7,322,370     $ 7,297,777     $ 7,265,673     $ 7,325,517     0.8 %   0.8 %
                                             
    Demand: interest-bearing $ 79,369     $ 79,784     $ 83,647     $ 85,443     $ 86,401     -0.5 %   -8.1 %
    Money market and savings   2,037,224       1,934,540       1,885,799       1,845,870       1,815,085     5.3 %   12.2 %
    Time deposits   2,345,346       2,346,363       2,427,737       2,453,154       2,507,830     0.0 %   -6.5 %
    Average interest-bearing deposits   4,461,939       4,360,687       4,397,183       4,384,467       4,409,316     2.3 %   1.2 %
    Borrowings   179,444       141,604       143,479       169,525       162,418     26.7 %   10.5 %
    Subordinated debentures   130,718       130,567       130,403       130,239       130,088     0.1 %   0.5 %
    Average interest-bearing liabilities $ 4,772,101     $ 4,632,858     $ 4,671,065     $ 4,684,231     $ 4,701,822     3.0 %   1.5 %
                                             
    Average Noninterest Bearing Deposits                                        
    Demand deposits – noninterest bearing $ 1,895,953     $ 1,967,789     $ 1,908,833     $ 1,883,765     $ 1,921,189     -3.7 %   -1.3 %
                                             
    (1) Includes loans held for sale.                    
                                             
      For the Three Months Ended     Yield/Rate Change  
    Average Yields Mar 31,     Dec 31,     Sep 30,     Jun 30,     Mar 31,     Q1-25     Q1-25  
    and Rates 2025     2024     2024     2024     2024     vs. Q4-24     vs. Q1-24  
    Loans receivable (1) 5.95 %   5.97 %   6.00 %   5.99 %   6.00 %   -0.02     -0.05  
    Securities (2) 2.49 %   2.38 %   2.27 %   2.17 %   2.07 %   0.11     0.42  
    FHLB stock 8.92 %   8.75 %   8.65 %   8.77 %   8.87 %   0.17     0.05  
    Interest-bearing deposits in other banks 4.24 %   4.56 %   5.12 %   5.16 %   5.19 %   -0.32     -0.95  
    Interest-earning assets 5.45 %   5.45 %   5.48 %   5.46 %   5.47 %   0.00     -0.02  
                                             
    Interest-bearing deposits 3.69 %   3.96 %   4.27 %   4.27 %   4.16 %   -0.27     -0.47  
    Borrowings 4.57 %   4.59 %   4.33 %   4.50 %   4.10 %   -0.02     0.47  
    Subordinated debentures 4.84 %   4.97 %   5.07 %   5.07 %   5.06 %   -0.13     -0.22  
    Interest-bearing liabilities 3.75 %   4.01 %   4.29 %   4.30 %   4.19 %   -0.26     -0.44  
                                             
    Net interest margin (taxable equivalent basis) 3.02 %   2.91 %   2.74 %   2.69 %   2.78 %   0.11     0.24  
                                             
    Cost of deposits 2.59 %   2.73 %   2.97 %   2.98 %   2.90 %   -0.14     -0.31  
                                             
    (1) Includes loans held for sale.                    
    (2) Amounts calculated on a fully taxable equivalent basis using the federal tax rate in effect for the periods presented.
                   

    Credit loss expense for the first quarter was $2.7 million, compared with $0.9 million for the fourth quarter of 2024. First quarter credit loss expense included a $2.4 million credit loss expense for loan losses and a $0.3 million credit loss expense for off-balance sheet items.

    Noninterest income for the first quarter increased $0.3 million, or 5.0%, to $7.7 million from $7.4 million for the fourth quarter of 2024. The increase was primarily due to a $0.6 million increase on gains from the sale of SBA loans. Gains on sales of SBA loans were $2.0 million for the first quarter of 2025, compared with $1.4 million for the fourth quarter of 2024. The volume of SBA loans sold for the first quarter increased to $32.2 million from $21.6 million for the fourth quarter of 2024, while trade premiums were 7.82% for the first quarter of 2025 compared with 8.53% for the fourth quarter. Mortgage loans sold for the first quarter were $10.0 million, with a premium of 2.50%, compared with $18.3 million and 1.96% for the fourth quarter. Gains on mortgage loans sold were $0.2 million for the first quarter, compared with $0.3 million for the fourth quarter.

      For the Three Months Ended (in thousands)     Percentage Change  
      Mar 31,     Dec 31,     Sep 30,     Jun 30,     Mar 31,     Q1-25     Q1-25  
    Noninterest Income 2025     2024     2024     2024     2024     vs. Q4-24     vs. Q1-24  
    Service charges on deposit accounts $ 2,217     $ 2,192     $ 2,311     $ 2,429     $ 2,450     1.1 %   -9.5 %
    Trade finance and other service charges and fees   1,396       1,364       1,254       1,277       1,414     2.3 %   -1.3 %
    Servicing income   732       668       817       796       712     9.6 %   2.8 %
    Bank-owned life insurance income   309       316       320       638       304     -2.2 %   1.6 %
    All other operating income   897       1,037       1,008       908       928     -13.5 %   -3.3 %
    Service charges, fees & other   5,551       5,577       5,710       6,048       5,808     -0.5 %   -4.4 %
                                             
    Gain on sale of SBA loans   2,000       1,443       1,544       1,644       1,482     38.6 %   35.0 %
    Gain on sale of mortgage loans   175       337       324       365       443     -48.1 %   -60.5 %
    Gain on sale of bank premises               860                 0.0 %   0.0 %
    Total noninterest income $ 7,726     $ 7,357     $ 8,438     $ 8,057     $ 7,733     5.0 %   -0.1 %
                                             

    Noninterest expense for the first quarter increased $0.5 million to $35.0 million from $34.5 million for the fourth quarter of 2024. The increase was primarily due to a $1.6 million gain on the sale of an other-real-estate-owned property in the fourth quarter. Absent this gain, first quarter noninterest expense was down 3.2% sequentially due to decreases in professional fees, advertising and promotion, and other operating expenses, partially offset by a $0.5 million increase in salaries and benefits, which reflected seasonal first quarter increases. All other operating expenses decreased $0.7 million for the first quarter primarily due to the absence of a fourth quarter $0.5 million charge related to an SBA loan acquired in a previous acquisition. The efficiency ratio improved during the first quarter to 55.7%, compared with 56.8% for the fourth quarter of 2024.

      For the Three Months Ended (in thousands)     Percentage Change  
      Mar 31,     Dec 31,     Sep 30,     Jun 30,     Mar 31,     Q1-25     Q1-25  
      2025     2024     2024     2024     2024     vs. Q4-24     vs. Q1-24  
    Noninterest Expense                                        
    Salaries and employee benefits $ 20,972     $ 20,498     $ 20,851     $ 20,434     $ 21,585     2.3 %   -2.8 %
    Occupancy and equipment   4,450       4,503       4,499       4,348       4,537     -1.2 %   -1.9 %
    Data processing   3,787       3,800       3,839       3,686       3,551     -0.3 %   6.6 %
    Professional fees   1,468       1,821       1,492       1,749       1,893     -19.4 %   -22.5 %
    Supplies and communication   517       551       538       570       601     -6.2 %   -14.0 %
    Advertising and promotion   585       821       631       669       907     -28.7 %   -35.5 %
    All other operating expenses   3,175       3,847       2,875       3,251       3,160     -17.5 %   0.5 %
    Subtotal   34,954       35,841       34,725       34,707       36,234     -2.5 %   -3.5 %
                                             
    Branch consolidation expense                     301           0.0 %   0.0 %
    Other real estate owned expense (income)   41       (1,588 )     77       6       22     102.6 %   86.4 %
    Repossessed personal property expense (income)   (11 )     281       278       262       189     -103.9 %   -105.8 %
    Total noninterest expense $ 34,984     $ 34,534     $ 35,080     $ 35,276     $ 36,445     1.3 %   -4.0 %
                                             

    Hanmi recorded a provision for income taxes of $7.4 million for the first quarter of 2025, compared with $7.6 million for the fourth quarter of 2024, representing an effective tax rate of 29.6% and 30.1%, respectively.

    Financial Position
    Total assets at March 31, 2025 increased 0.7%, or $51.1 million, to $7.73 billion from $7.68 billion at December 31, 2024. The increase reflected a $30.4 million increase in loans and a $24.2 million increase in cash, offset partially by a $7.6 million decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets.

    Loans receivable, before allowance for credit losses, were $6.28 billion at March 31, 2025, up from $6.25 billion at December 31, 2024.

    Loans held-for-sale were $11.8 million at March 31, 2025, up from $8.6 million at December 31, 2024. At the end of the first quarter, loans held-for-sale consisted of the guaranteed portion of SBA 7(a) loans.

      As of (in thousands)     Percentage Change  
      Mar 31,     Dec 31,     Sep 30,     Jun 30,     Mar 31,     Q1-25     Q1-25  
      2025     2024     2024     2024     2024     vs. Q4-24     vs. Q1-24  
    Loan Portfolio                                        
    Commercial real estate loans $ 3,975,651     $ 3,949,622     $ 3,932,088     $ 3,888,505     $ 3,878,677     0.7 %   2.5 %
    Residential/consumer loans   979,536       951,302       939,285       954,209       970,362     3.0 %   0.9 %
    Commercial and industrial loans   854,406       863,431       879,092       802,372       774,851     -1.0 %   10.3 %
    Equipment finance   472,596       487,022       507,279       531,273       553,950     -3.0 %   -14.7 %
    Loans receivable   6,282,189       6,251,377       6,257,744       6,176,359       6,177,840     0.5 %   1.7 %
    Loans held for sale   11,831       8,579       54,336       10,467       3,999     37.9 %   195.8 %
    Total $ 6,294,020     $ 6,259,956     $ 6,312,080     $ 6,186,826     $ 6,181,839     0.5 %   1.8 %
                                                       
      As of  
      Mar 31,     Dec 31,     Sep 30,     Jun 30,     Mar 31,  
      2025     2024     2024     2024     2024  
    Composition of Loan Portfolio                            
    Commercial real estate loans 63.1 %   63.1 %   62.3 %   62.9 %   62.7 %
    Residential/consumer loans 15.6 %   15.2 %   14.9 %   15.4 %   15.7 %
    Commercial and industrial loans 13.6 %   13.8 %   13.9 %   13.0 %   12.5 %
    Equipment finance 7.5 %   7.8 %   8.0 %   8.5 %   9.0 %
    Loans receivable 99.8 %   99.9 %   99.1 %   99.8 %   99.9 %
    Loans held for sale 0.2 %   0.1 %   0.9 %   0.2 %   0.1 %
    Total 100.0 %   100.0 %   100.0 %   100.0 %   100.0 %
                                 

    New loan production was $345.9 million for the first quarter of 2025 with an average rate of 7.35%, while payoffs were $125.1 million during the quarter at an average rate of 6.40%.

    Commercial real estate loan production for the first quarter of 2025 was $146.6 million. Commercial and industrial loan production was $42.3 million, SBA loan production was $55.2 million, equipment finance production was $46.7 million, and residential mortgage loan production was $55.0 million.

      For the Three Months Ended (in thousands)  
      Mar 31,     Dec 31,     Sep 30,     Jun 30,     Mar 31,  
      2025     2024     2024     2024     2024  
    New Loan Production                            
    Commercial real estate loans $ 146,606     $ 146,716     $ 110,246     $ 87,632     $ 60,085  
    Residential/consumer loans   55,000       40,225       40,758       30,194       53,115  
    Commercial and industrial loans   42,344       60,159       105,086       59,007       50,789  
    Equipment finance   46,749       42,168       40,066       42,594       39,155  
    SBA loans   55,242       49,740       51,616       54,486       30,817  
    subtotal   345,941       339,008       347,772       273,913       233,961  
                                 
                                 
    Payoffs   (125,102 )     (137,933 )     (77,603 )     (148,400 )     (86,250 )
    Amortization   (90,743 )     (60,583 )     (151,674 )     (83,640 )     (90,711 )
    Loan sales   (42,193 )     (67,852 )     (43,868 )     (42,945 )     (55,321 )
    Net line utilization   (53,901 )     (75,651 )     9,426       1,929       (4,150 )
    Charge-offs & OREO   (3,190 )     (3,356 )     (2,668 )     (2,338 )     (2,123 )
                                 
    Loans receivable-beginning balance   6,251,377       6,257,744       6,176,359       6,177,840       6,182,434  
    Loans receivable-ending balance $ 6,282,189     $ 6,251,377     $ 6,257,744     $ 6,176,359     $ 6,177,840  
                                           

    Deposits were $6.62 billion at the end of the first quarter of 2025, up $183.7 million, or 2.9%, from $6.44 billion at the end of the prior quarter. Driving the change was a $140.4 million increase in money market and savings deposits and a $72.8 million increase in time deposits, partially offset by a $30.0 million decrease in noninterest-bearing demand deposits. Noninterest-bearing demand deposits represented 31.2% of total deposits at March 31, 2025 and the loan-to-deposit ratio was 94.9%.

      As of (in thousands)     Percentage Change  
      Mar 31,     Dec 31,     Sep 30,     Jun 30,     Mar 31,     Q1-25     Q1-25  
      2025     2024     2024     2024     2024     vs. Q4-24     vs. Q1-24  
    Deposit Portfolio                                        
    Demand: noninterest-bearing $ 2,066,659     $ 2,096,634     $ 2,051,790     $ 1,959,963     $ 1,933,060     -1.4 %   6.9 %
    Demand: interest-bearing   80,790       80,323       79,287       82,981       87,374     0.6 %   -7.5 %
    Money market and savings   2,073,943       1,933,535       1,898,834       1,834,797       1,859,865     7.3 %   11.5 %
    Time deposits   2,398,083       2,325,284       2,373,310       2,451,599       2,495,761     3.1 %   -3.9 %
    Total deposits $ 6,619,475     $ 6,435,776     $ 6,403,221     $ 6,329,340     $ 6,376,060     2.9 %   3.8 %
                                                       
      As of  
      Mar 31,     Dec 31,     Sep 30,     Jun 30,     Mar 31,  
      2025     2024     2024     2024     2024  
    Composition of Deposit Portfolio                            
    Demand: noninterest-bearing 31.2 %   32.6 %   32.0 %   31.0 %   30.3 %
    Demand: interest-bearing 1.2 %   1.2 %   1.2 %   1.3 %   1.4 %
    Money market and savings 31.3 %   30.0 %   29.7 %   29.0 %   29.2 %
    Time deposits 36.3 %   36.2 %   37.1 %   38.7 %   39.1 %
    Total deposits 100.0 %   100.0 %   100.0 %   100.0 %   100.0 %

    Stockholders’ equity at March 31, 2025 was $751.5 million, up $19.3 million from $732.2 million at December 31, 2024. The increase included $9.5 million in net income, net of dividends paid, for the first quarter. In addition, the increase in stockholders’ equity included a $10.4 million decrease in unrealized after-tax losses on securities available for sale, and a $0.3 million decrease in unrealized after-tax losses on cash flow hedges, due to changes in interest rates during the first quarter of 2025. Hanmi also repurchased 50,000 shares of common stock at a cost of $1.1 million, for an average share price of $22.49, during the quarter. At March 31, 2025, 1,180,500 shares remain under Hanmi’s share repurchase program. Tangible common stockholders’ equity was $740.5 million, or 9.59% of tangible assets at March 31, 2025 compared with $721.1 million, or 9.41% of tangible assets at the end of the prior quarter. Please refer to the Non-GAAP Financial Measures section below for more information.

    Hanmi and the Bank exceeded minimum regulatory capital requirements, and the Bank continues to exceed the minimum for the “well capitalized” category. At March 31, 2025, Hanmi’s preliminary common equity tier 1 capital ratio was 12.13% and its total risk-based capital ratio was 15.29%, compared with 12.11% and 15.24%, respectively, at the end of the prior quarter.

      As of     Ratio Change  
      Mar 31,     Dec 31,     Sep 30,     Jun 30,     Mar 31,     Q1-25     Q1-25  
      2025     2024     2024     2024     2024     vs. Q4-24     vs. Q1-24  
    Regulatory Capital ratios (1)                                        
    Hanmi Financial                                        
    Total risk-based capital 15.29 %   15.24 %   15.03 %   15.24 %   15.20 %   0.05     0.09  
    Tier 1 risk-based capital 12.47 %   12.46 %   12.29 %   12.46 %   12.40 %   0.01     0.07  
    Common equity tier 1 capital 12.13 %   12.11 %   11.95 %   12.11 %   12.05 %   0.02     0.08  
    Tier 1 leverage capital ratio 10.67 %   10.63 %   10.56 %   10.51 %   10.36 %   0.04     0.31  
    Hanmi Bank                                        
    Total risk-based capital 14.48 %   14.43 %   14.27 %   14.51 %   14.50 %   0.05     -0.02  
    Tier 1 risk-based capital 13.35 %   13.36 %   13.23 %   13.47 %   13.44 %   -0.01     -0.09  
    Common equity tier 1 capital 13.35 %   13.36 %   13.23 %   13.47 %   13.44 %   -0.01     -0.09  
    Tier 1 leverage capital ratio 11.49 %   11.47 %   11.43 %   11.41 %   11.29 %   0.02     0.20  
                                             
    (1) Preliminary ratios for March 31, 2025                    
                                             

    Asset Quality
    Loans 30 to 89 days past due and still accruing were 0.28% of loans at the end of the first quarter of 2025, compared with 0.30% at the end of the prior quarter.

    Criticized loans totaled $164.9 million at March 31, 2025, down from $165.3 million at the end of the fourth quarter of 2024. The $0.4 million decrease resulted from a $21.2 million decrease in special mention loans, partially offset by a $20.8 million increase in classified loans. The $21.2 million decrease in special mention loans included loan upgrades of $20.5 million and amortization/paydowns of $0.9 million, offset by additions of $0.2 million. The $20.8 million increase in classified loans resulted from $22.8 million of loan downgrades and $3.4 million of equipment financing downgrades. Loan downgrades were primarily the result of a $20.0 million syndicated commercial real estate office loan designated as nonaccrual during the first quarter of 2025. Additions were offset by $2.7 million of equipment financing  charge-offs, $1.1 million of payoffs, $1.0 million of amortization/paydowns, $0.3 million of loan charge-offs and $0.3 million of loan upgrades.

    Nonperforming loans were $35.6 million at March 31, 2025, up from $14.3 million at the end of the prior quarter. The $21.3 million increase primarily reflects additions of $26.1 million, offset by charge-offs of $3.0 million, pay-offs of $0.8 million, $0.9 million in paydowns, and loan upgrades of $0.1 million. Additions included $23.0 million of loans and $3.1 million of equipment financing agreements. Loan additions were driven primarily by the previously mentioned $20.0 million commercial real estate loan designated as nonaccrual during the first quarter of 2025.

    Nonperforming assets were $35.7 million at March 31, 2025, up from $14.4 million at the end of the prior quarter. As a percentage of total assets, nonperforming assets were 0.46% at March 31, 2025, and 0.19% at the end of the prior quarter.

    Gross charge-offs for the first quarter of 2025 were $3.2 million, compared with $3.4 million for the preceding quarter. Charge-offs included $2.8 million on equipment financing agreements. Recoveries of previously charged-off loans were $1.3 million in the first quarter of 2025, which included $0.8 million of recoveries on equipment financing agreements. As a result, there were $1.9 million of net charge-offs for the first quarter of 2025, compared to net recoveries of $0.1 million for the prior quarter.

    The allowance for credit losses was $70.6 million at March 31, 2025, compared with $70.1 million at December 31, 2024. Specific allowances for loans increased $5.6 million because of a $6.2 million specific allowance on the previously mentioned $20.0 million commercial real estate loan designated as nonaccrual during the first quarter of 2025, and collectively evaluated allowances decreased $5.2 million. The ratio of the allowance for credit losses to loans was 1.12% at March 31, 2025 and at the end of the prior quarter.

      As of or for the Three Months Ended (in thousands)     Amount Change  
      Mar 31,     Dec 31,     Sep 30,     Jun 30,     Mar 31,     Q1-25     Q1-25  
      2025     2024     2024     2024     2024     vs. Q4-24     vs. Q1-24  
    Asset Quality Data and Ratios                                        
                                             
    Delinquent loans:                                        
    Loans, 30 to 89 days past due and still accruing $ 17,312     $ 18,454     $ 15,027     $ 13,844     $ 15,839     $ (1,142 )   $ 1,473  
    Delinquent loans to total loans   0.28 %     0.30 %     0.24 %     0.22 %     0.26 %     (0.02 )     0.02  
                                             
    Criticized loans:                                        
    Special mention $ 118,380     $ 139,612     $ 131,575     $ 36,921     $ 62,317     $ (21,232 )   $ 56,063  
    Classified   46,519       25,683       28,377       33,945       23,670       20,836       22,849  
    Total criticized loans (1) $ 164,899     $ 165,295     $ 159,952     $ 70,866     $ 85,987     $ (396 )   $ 78,912  
                                             
    Criticized loans to total loans   2.62 %     2.64 %     2.56 %     1.15 %     1.39 %     (0.02 )     1.23  
                                             
    Nonperforming assets:                                        
    Nonaccrual loans $ 35,459     $ 14,272     $ 15,248     $ 19,245     $ 14,025     $ 21,187     $ 21,434  
    Loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing   112             242                   112       112  
    Nonperforming loans (2)   35,571       14,272       15,490       19,245       14,025       21,299       21,546  
    Other real estate owned, net   117       117       772       772       117              
    Nonperforming assets (3) $ 35,688     $ 14,389     $ 16,262     $ 20,017     $ 14,142     $ 21,299     $ 21,546  
                                             
    Nonperforming assets to assets (2)   0.46 %     0.19 %     0.21 %     0.26 %     0.19 %     0.27       0.27  
    Nonperforming loans to total loans   0.57 %     0.23 %     0.25 %     0.31 %     0.23 %     0.34       0.34  
                                             
    (1) Includes nonaccrual loans of $34.4 million, $13.4 million, $13.6 million, $18.4 million, and $14.0 million as of Q1-25, Q4-24, Q3-24, Q2-24, and Q1-24, respectively. 
    (2) Excludes a $27.2 million nonperforming loan held-for-sale as of September 30, 2024.    
    (3) Excludes repossessed personal property of $0.7 million, $0.6 million, $1.2 million, $1.2 million, and $1.3 million as of Q1-25, Q4-24, Q3-24, Q2-24, and Q1-24, respectively. 
       
      As of or for the Three Months Ended (in thousands)  
      Mar 31,     Dec 31,     Sep 30,     Jun 30,     Mar 31,  
      2025     2024     2024     2024     2024  
    Allowance for credit losses related to loans:                            
    Balance at beginning of period $ 70,147     $ 69,163     $ 67,729     $ 68,270     $ 69,462  
    Credit loss expense (recovery) on loans   2,396       855       2,312       1,248       404  
    Net loan (charge-offs) recoveries   (1,946 )     129       (878 )     (1,789 )     (1,596 )
    Balance at end of period $ 70,597     $ 70,147     $ 69,163     $ 67,729     $ 68,270  
                                 
    Net loan charge-offs (recoveries) to average loans (1)   0.13 %     -0.01 %     0.06 %     0.12 %     0.10 %
    Allowance for credit losses to loans   1.12 %     1.12 %     1.11 %     1.10 %     1.11 %
                                 
    Allowance for credit losses related to off-balance sheet items:                            
    Balance at beginning of period $ 2,074     $ 1,984     $ 2,010     $ 2,297     $ 2,474  
    Credit loss expense (recovery) on off-balance sheet items   325       90       (26 )     (287 )     (177 )
    Balance at end of period $ 2,399     $ 2,074     $ 1,984     $ 2,010     $ 2,297  
                                 
    Unused commitments to extend credit $ 896,282     $ 782,587     $ 739,975     $ 795,391     $ 792,769  
                                 
    (1) Annualized                            

    Corporate Developments
    On January 28, 2025, Hanmi’s Board of Directors declared a cash dividend on its common stock for the 2025 first quarter of $0.27 per share. Hanmi paid the dividend on February 26, 2025, to stockholders of record as of the close of business on February 10, 2025.

    Earnings Conference Call        
    Hanmi Bank will host its first quarter 2025 earnings conference call today, April 22, 2025, at 2:00 p.m. PST (5:00 p.m. EST) to discuss these results. This call will also be webcast. To access the call, please dial 1-877-407-9039 before 2:00 p.m. PST, using access code Hanmi Bank. To listen to the call online, either live or archived, please visit Hanmi’s Investor Relations website at https://investors.hanmi.com/ where it will also be available for replay approximately one hour following the call.

    About Hanmi Financial Corporation
    Headquartered in Los Angeles, California, Hanmi Financial Corporation owns Hanmi Bank, which serves multi-ethnic communities through its network of 32 full-service branches and eight loan production offices in California, Texas, Illinois, Virginia, New Jersey, New York, Colorado, Washington and Georgia. Hanmi Bank specializes in real estate, commercial, SBA and trade finance lending to small and middle market businesses. Additional information is available at www.hanmi.com.

    Forward-Looking Statements
    This press release contains forward-looking statements, which are included in accordance with the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements other than statements of historical fact are “forward–looking statements” for purposes of federal and state securities laws, including, but not limited to, statements about our anticipated future operating and financial performance, financial position and liquidity, business strategies, regulatory and competitive outlook, investment and expenditure plans, capital and financing needs and availability, plans and objectives of management for future operations, developments regarding our capital and strategic plans, and other similar forecasts and statements of expectation and statements of assumption underlying any of the foregoing. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “expects,” “plans,” “intends,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential,” or “continue,” or the negative of such terms and other comparable terminology. Although we believe that our forward-looking statements to be reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements.

    Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to differ from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. These factors include the following:

    • a failure to maintain adequate levels of capital and liquidity to support our operations;
    • general economic and business conditions internationally, nationally and in those areas in which we operate, including any potential recessionary conditions;
    • volatility and deterioration in the credit and equity markets;
    • changes in consumer spending, borrowing and savings habits;
    • availability of capital from private and government sources;
    • demographic changes;
    • competition for loans and deposits and failure to attract or retain loans and deposits;
    • inflation and fluctuations in interest rates that reduce our margins and yields, the fair value of financial instruments, the level of loan originations or prepayments on loans we have made and make, the level of loan sales and the cost we pay to retain and attract deposits and secure other types of funding;
    • our ability to enter new markets successfully and capitalize on growth opportunities;
    • the current or anticipated impact of military conflict, terrorism or other geopolitical events;
    • the effect of potential future supervisory action against us or Hanmi Bank and our ability to address any issues raised in our regulatory exams;
    • risks of natural disasters;
    • legal proceedings and litigation brought against us;
    • a failure in or breach of our operational or security systems or infrastructure, including cyberattacks;
    • the failure to maintain current technologies;
    • risks associated with Small Business Administration loans;
    • failure to attract or retain key employees;
    • our ability to access cost-effective funding;
    • the imposition of tariffs or other domestic or international governmental policies;
    • changes in liquidity, including the size and composition of our deposit portfolio and the percentage of uninsured deposits in the portfolio;
    • fluctuations in real estate values;
    • changes in accounting policies and practices;
    • changes in governmental regulation, including, but not limited to, any increase in FDIC insurance premiums and changes in the monetary policies of the U.S. Treasury and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System;
    • the ability of Hanmi Bank to make distributions to Hanmi Financial Corporation, which is restricted by certain factors, including Hanmi Bank’s retained earnings, net income, prior distributions made, and certain other financial tests;
    • strategic transactions we may enter into;
    • the adequacy of and changes in the methodology for computing our allowance for credit losses;
    • our credit quality and the effect of credit quality on our credit losses expense and allowance for credit losses;
    • changes in the financial performance and/or condition of our borrowers and the ability of our borrowers to perform under the terms of their loans and other terms of credit agreements;
    • our ability to control expenses; and
    • cyber security and fraud risks against our information technology and those of our third-party providers and vendors.

    In addition, we set forth certain risks in our reports filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, including, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, and Current Reports on Form 8-K that we will file hereafter, which could cause actual results to differ from those projected. We undertake no obligation to update such forward-looking statements except as required by law.

    Investor Contacts:
    Romolo (Ron) Santarosa
    Senior Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
    213-427-5636

    Lisa Fortuna
    Investor Relations
    Financial Profiles, Inc.
    lfortuna@finprofiles.com
    310-622-8251

    Hanmi Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
    Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)
    (Dollars in thousands)

      March 31,     December 31,     Percentage     March 31,     Percentage  
      2025     2024     Change     2024     Change  
    Assets                            
    Cash and due from banks $ 329,003     $ 304,800       7.9 %   $ 256,038       28.5 %
    Securities available for sale, at fair value   907,011       905,798       0.1 %     872,190       4.0 %
    Loans held for sale, at the lower of cost or fair value   11,831       8,579       37.9 %     3,999       195.8 %
    Loans receivable, net of allowance for credit losses   6,211,592       6,181,230       0.5 %     6,109,570       1.7 %
    Accrued interest receivable   23,536       22,937       2.6 %     23,032       2.2 %
    Premises and equipment, net   20,866       21,404       -2.5 %     21,952       -4.9 %
    Customers’ liability on acceptances   552       1,226       -55.0 %     161       242.9 %
    Servicing assets   6,422       6,457       -0.5 %     6,890       -6.8 %
    Goodwill and other intangible assets, net   11,031       11,031       0.0 %     11,074       -0.4 %
    Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) stock, at cost   16,385       16,385       0.0 %     16,385       0.0 %
    Bank-owned life insurance   57,476       57,168       0.5 %     56,639       1.5 %
    Prepaid expenses and other assets   133,330       140,910       -5.4 %     134,116       -0.6 %
    Total assets $ 7,729,035     $ 7,677,925       0.7 %   $ 7,512,046       2.9 %
                                 
    Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity                            
    Liabilities:                            
    Deposits:                            
    Noninterest-bearing $ 2,066,659     $ 2,096,634       -1.4 %   $ 1,933,060       6.9 %
    Interest-bearing   4,552,816       4,339,142       4.9 %     4,443,000       2.5 %
    Total deposits   6,619,475       6,435,776       2.9 %     6,376,060       3.8 %
    Accrued interest payable   29,646       34,824       -14.9 %     38,007       -22.0 %
    Bank’s liability on acceptances   552       1,226       -55.0 %     161       242.9 %
    Borrowings   117,500       262,500       -55.2 %     172,500       -31.9 %
    Subordinated debentures   130,799       130,638       0.1 %     130,165       0.5 %
    Accrued expenses and other liabilities   79,578       80,787       -1.5 %     92,053       -13.6 %
    Total liabilities   6,977,550       6,945,751       0.5 %     6,808,946       2.5 %
                                 
    Stockholders’ equity:                            
    Common stock   34       34       0.0 %     34       0.0 %
    Additional paid-in capital   591,942       591,069       0.1 %     587,687       0.7 %
    Accumulated other comprehensive income   (60,002 )     (70,723 )     15.2 %     (76,890 )     22.0 %
    Retained earnings   360,289       350,869       2.7 %     326,526       10.3 %
    Less treasury stock   (140,778 )     (139,075 )     -1.2 %     (134,257 )     -4.9 %
    Total stockholders’ equity   751,485       732,174       2.6 %     703,100       6.9 %
    Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $ 7,729,035     $ 7,677,925       0.7 %   $ 7,512,046       2.9 %
                                 

    Hanmi Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
    Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited)
    (Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

      Three Months Ended  
      March 31,     December 31,     Percentage     March 31,     Percentage  
      2025     2024     Change     2024     Change  
    Interest and dividend income:                            
    Interest and fees on loans receivable $ 90,887     $ 91,545       -0.7 %   $ 91,674       -0.9 %
    Interest on securities   6,169       5,866       5.2 %     4,955       24.5 %
    Dividends on FHLB stock   360       360       0.0 %     361       -0.3 %
    Interest on deposits in other banks   1,841       2,342       -21.4 %     2,604       -29.3 %
    Total interest and dividend income   99,257       100,113       -0.9 %     99,594       -0.3 %
    Interest expense:                            
    Interest on deposits   40,559       43,406       -6.6 %     45,638       -11.1 %
    Interest on borrowings   2,024       1,634       23.9 %     1,655       22.3 %
    Interest on subordinated debentures   1,582       1,624       -2.6 %     1,646       -3.9 %
    Total interest expense   44,165       46,664       -5.4 %     48,939       -9.8 %
    Net interest income before credit loss expense   55,092       53,449       3.1 %     50,655       8.8 %
    Credit loss expense   2,721       945       187.9 %     227       1098.7 %
    Net interest income after credit loss expense   52,371       52,504       -0.3 %     50,428       3.9 %
    Noninterest income:                            
    Service charges on deposit accounts   2,217       2,192       1.1 %     2,450       -9.5 %
    Trade finance and other service charges and fees   1,396       1,364       2.3 %     1,414       -1.3 %
    Gain on sale of Small Business Administration (“SBA”) loans   2,000       1,443       38.6 %     1,482       35.0 %
    Other operating income   2,113       2,358       -10.4 %     2,387       -11.5 %
    Total noninterest income   7,726       7,357       5.0 %     7,733       -0.1 %
    Noninterest expense:                            
    Salaries and employee benefits   20,972       20,498       2.3 %     21,585       -2.8 %
    Occupancy and equipment   4,450       4,503       -1.2 %     4,537       -1.9 %
    Data processing   3,787       3,800       -0.3 %     3,551       6.6 %
    Professional fees   1,468       1,821       -19.4 %     1,893       -22.5 %
    Supplies and communications   517       551       -6.2 %     601       -14.0 %
    Advertising and promotion   585       821       -28.7 %     907       -35.5 %
    Other operating expenses   3,205       2,540       26.2 %     3,371       -4.9 %
    Total noninterest expense   34,984       34,534       1.3 %     36,445       -4.0 %
    Income before tax   25,113       25,327       -0.8 %     21,716       15.6 %
    Income tax expense   7,441       7,632       -2.5 %     6,552       13.6 %
    Net income $ 17,672     $ 17,695       -0.1 %   $ 15,164       16.5 %
                                 
    Basic earnings per share: $ 0.59     $ 0.59           $ 0.50        
    Diluted earnings per share: $ 0.58     $ 0.58           $ 0.50        
                                 
    Weighted-average shares outstanding:                            
    Basic   29,937,660       29,933,644             30,119,646        
    Diluted   30,058,248       30,011,773             30,119,646        
    Common shares outstanding   30,233,514       30,195,999             30,276,358        
                                       

    Hanmi Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
    Average Balance, Average Yield Earned, and Average Rate Paid (Unaudited)
    (Dollars in thousands)

      Three Months Ended  
      March 31, 2025     December 31, 2024     March 31, 2024  
            Interest   Average           Interest   Average           Interest   Average  
      Average     Income /   Yield /     Average     Income /   Yield /     Average     Income /   Yield /  
      Balance     Expense   Rate     Balance     Expense   Rate     Balance     Expense   Rate  
    Assets                                              
    Interest-earning assets:                                              
    Loans receivable (1) $ 6,189,531     $ 90,887   5.95 %   $ 6,103,264     $ 91,545   5.97 %   $ 6,137,888     $ 91,674   6.00 %
    Securities (2)   1,001,499       6,169   2.49 %     998,313       5,866   2.38 %     969,520       4,955   2.07 %
    FHLB stock   16,385       360   8.92 %     16,385       360   8.75 %     16,385       361   8.87 %
    Interest-bearing deposits in other banks   176,028       1,841   4.24 %     204,408       2,342   4.56 %     201,724       2,604   5.19 %
    Total interest-earning assets   7,383,443       99,257   5.45 %     7,322,370       100,113   5.45 %     7,325,517       99,594   5.47 %
                                                   
    Noninterest-earning assets:                                              
    Cash and due from banks   53,670                 54,678                 58,382            
    Allowance for credit losses   (69,648 )               (69,291 )               (69,106 )          
    Other assets   249,148                 246,744                 244,700            
                                                   
    Total assets $ 7,616,613               $ 7,554,501               $ 7,559,493            
                                                   
    Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity                                              
    Interest-bearing liabilities:                                              
    Deposits:                                              
    Demand: interest-bearing $ 79,369     $ 27   0.14 %   $ 79,784     $ 26   0.13 %   $ 86,401     $ 30   0.14 %
    Money market and savings   2,037,224       16,437   3.27 %     1,934,540       16,564   3.41 %     1,815,085       16,553   3.67 %
    Time deposits   2,345,346       24,095   4.17 %     2,346,363       26,816   4.55 %     2,507,830       29,055   4.66 %
    Total interest-bearing deposits   4,461,939       40,559   3.69 %     4,360,687       43,406   3.96 %     4,409,316       45,638   4.16 %
    Borrowings   179,444       2,024   4.57 %     141,604       1,634   4.59 %     162,418       1,655   4.10 %
    Subordinated debentures   130,718       1,582   4.84 %     130,567       1,624   4.97 %     130,088       1,646   5.06 %
    Total interest-bearing liabilities   4,772,101       44,165   3.75 %     4,632,858       46,664   4.01 %     4,701,822       48,939   4.19 %
                                                   
    Noninterest-bearing liabilities and equity:                                              
    Demand deposits: noninterest-bearing   1,895,953                 1,967,789                 1,921,189            
    Other liabilities   144,654                 162,064                 164,524            
    Stockholders’ equity   803,905                 791,790                 771,958            
                                                   
    Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $ 7,616,613               $ 7,554,501               $ 7,559,493            
                                                   
    Net interest income       $ 55,092               $ 53,449               $ 50,655      
                                                   
    Cost of deposits           2.59 %             2.73 %             2.90 %
    Net interest spread (taxable equivalent basis)           1.70 %             1.44 %             1.28 %
    Net interest margin (taxable equivalent basis)           3.02 %             2.91 %             2.78 %
                                                   
                                                   
                                                   
    (1) Includes average loans held for sale.
    (2) Income calculated on a fully taxable equivalent basis using the federal tax rate in effect for the periods presented.

    Non-GAAP Financial Measures

    These disclosures should not be viewed as a substitute for results determined in accordance with GAAP, nor is it necessarily comparable to non-GAAP performance measures that may be presented by other companies.

    Tangible Common Equity to Tangible Assets Ratio

    Tangible common equity to tangible assets ratio is supplemental financial information determined by a method other than in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). This non-GAAP measure is used by management in the analysis of Hanmi’s capital strength. Tangible common equity is calculated by subtracting goodwill and other intangible assets from stockholders’ equity. Banking and financial institution regulators also exclude goodwill and other intangible assets from stockholders’ equity when assessing the capital adequacy of a financial institution. Management believes the presentation of this financial measure excluding the impact of these items provides useful supplemental information that is essential to a proper understanding of the capital strength of Hanmi.

    The following table reconciles this non-GAAP performance measure to the GAAP performance measure for the periods indicated:

    Tangible Common Equity to Tangible Assets Ratio (Unaudited)
    (In thousands, except share, per share data and ratios)

      March 31,     December 31,     September 30,     June 30,     March 31,  
    Hanmi Financial Corporation 2025     2024     2024     2024     2024  
    Assets $ 7,729,035     $ 7,677,925     $ 7,712,299     $ 7,586,347     $ 7,512,046  
    Less goodwill and other intangible assets   (11,031 )     (11,031 )     (11,031 )     (11,048 )     (11,074 )
    Tangible assets $ 7,718,004     $ 7,666,894     $ 7,701,268     $ 7,575,299     $ 7,500,972  
                                 
    Stockholders’ equity (1) $ 751,485     $ 732,174     $ 736,709     $ 707,059     $ 703,100  
    Less goodwill and other intangible assets   (11,031 )     (11,031 )     (11,031 )     (11,048 )     (11,074 )
    Tangible stockholders’ equity (1) $ 740,454     $ 721,143     $ 725,678     $ 696,011     $ 692,026  
                                 
    Stockholders’ equity to assets   9.72 %     9.54 %     9.55 %     9.32 %     9.36 %
    Tangible common equity to tangible assets (1)   9.59 %     9.41 %     9.42 %     9.19 %     9.23 %
                                 
    Common shares outstanding   30,233,514       30,195,999       30,196,755       30,272,110       30,276,358  
    Tangible common equity per common share $ 24.49     $ 23.88     $ 24.03     $ 22.99     $ 22.86  
                                 
                                 
    (1) There were no preferred shares outstanding at the periods indicated.
             

    Preprovision Net Revenues

    Preprovision net revenues is supplemental financial information determined by a method other than in accordance with U.S. GAAP. This non-GAAP measure is used by management to measure Hanmi’s core operational performance, excluding the impact of provisions for loan losses. By isolating preprovision net revenues, management can better understand the Company’s true profitability and make more informed strategic decisions. Preprovision net revenues is calculated adding income tax expense and credit loss expense to net income. Management believes this financial measure highlights the Company’s revenue activities and operational efficiency, excluding unpredictable loan loss provisions.

    The following table details the Company’s preprovision net revenues, which are non-GAAP measures, for the periods indicated:

    Preprovision Net Revenues (Unaudited)
    (In thousands, except percentages)

                                    Amount Change  
    Hanmi Financial   March 31,     December 31,     September 30,     June 30,     March 31,     Q1-25     Q1-25  
    Corporation 2025     2024     2024     2024     2024     vs. Q4-24     vs. Q1-24  
    Net income $ 17,672     $ 17,695     $ 14,892     $ 14,451     $ 15,164              
    Add back:                                        
    Credit loss expense   2,721       945       2,286       961       227              
    Income tax expense   7,441       7,632       6,231       5,989       6,552              
    Preprovision net revenues $ 27,834     $ 26,272     $ 23,409     $ 21,401     $ 21,943     5.9 %   26.8 %

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: SiriusPoint Announces Date for First Quarter 2025 Earnings Release

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    HAMILTON, Bermuda, April 22, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — SiriusPoint Ltd. (NYSE: SPNT) (“SiriusPoint” or the “Company”) today announced that it is planning to release its first quarter 2025 financial results after the market close on Monday, May 5, 2025. The Company will also hold a webcast, which can also be accessed as a conference call, to discuss its financial results at 8:30 am (Eastern Time) on Tuesday May 6, 2025.

    The webcast of the live conference call can be accessed by logging onto the Investor Relations section of the Company’s website at www.siriuspt.com. The online replay of the webcast will be available on the Company’s website immediately following the call.

    The conference call can be accessed by dialing 1-877-451-6152 (domestic) or 1-201-389-0879 (international) and asking for the SiriusPoint Ltd. First Quarter 2025 Earnings Call. A replay will be available at the conclusion of the call and can be accessed by dialing 1-844-512-2921, or for international callers 1-412-317-6671, and providing the passcode 13752221. The replay will be available until 11:59 pm (Eastern Time) on May 20, 2025.

    About SiriusPoint

    SiriusPoint is a global underwriter of insurance and reinsurance providing solutions to clients and brokers around the world. Bermuda-headquartered with offices in New York, London, Stockholm and other locations, we are listed on the New York Stock Exchange (SPNT). We have licenses to write Property & Casualty and Accident & Health insurance and reinsurance globally. Our offering and distribution capabilities are strengthened by a portfolio of strategic partnerships with Managing General Agents and Program Administrators within our Insurance & Services segment. With over $2.6 billion total capital, SiriusPoint’s operating companies have a financial strength rating of A- (Excellent) from AM Best, S&P and Fitch, and A3 from Moody’s. For more information, please visit www.siriuspt.com.

    Contacts

    Investor Relations
    Liam Blackledge, SiriusPoint
    liam.blackledge@siriuspt.com
    +44 203 772 3082

    Media
    Sarah Hills, Rein4ce
    sarah.hills@rein4ce.co.uk
    +44 771 888 2011

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: National Bank Holdings Corporation Announces First Quarter 2025 Financial Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    NYSE Ticker: NBHC

    DENVER, April 22, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — National Bank Holdings Corporation (the “Company”) reported:

        For the quarter(1)   For the quarter – adjusted(1)(2)
        1Q25   4Q24   1Q24   1Q25   4Q24   1Q24
    Net income ($000’s)   $ 24,231     $ 28,184     $ 31,391     $ 24,231     $ 33,232     $ 31,391  
    Earnings per share – diluted   $ 0.63     $ 0.73     $ 0.82     $ 0.63     $ 0.86     $ 0.82  
    Return on average assets     0.99 %     1.13 %     1.28 %     0.99 %     1.33 %     1.28 %
    Return on average tangible assets(2)     1.09 %     1.23 %     1.39 %     1.09 %     1.44 %     1.39 %
    Return on average equity     7.42 %     8.59 %     10.30 %     7.42 %     10.13 %     10.30 %
    Return on average tangible common equity(2)     10.64 %     12.31 %     15.14 %     10.64 %     14.40 %     15.14 %

                                                          

    (1)   Ratios are annualized.
    (2)   See non-GAAP reconciliations below.
         

    In announcing these results, Chief Executive Officer Tim Laney shared, “We delivered quarterly net income of $24.2 million and $0.63 of earnings per diluted share. The quarter’s results were negatively impacted by elevated provision primarily resulting from a loan charge-off involving suspected fraud by the borrower. Removing the impact of the fraud-related charge-off and a payroll tax credit benefit included in the quarter, earnings per share would have exceeded analysts’ median estimate for the quarter. It’s noteworthy that we delivered a return on tangible assets of 1.1% even in light of the charge-off. Further, past dues and non-performing loan ratios improved during the quarter. With a solid net interest margin of 3.93%, we drove 3.4% growth in our fully taxable equivalent net interest income over the same period last year.”

    Mr. Laney added, “Our commitment to serve our clients, coupled with building a fortress balance sheet with strong capital, liquidity, and diversified sources of funding has led us to be recognized by Forbes as one of the best banks in the United States. Our Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio totaled 13.6% and tangible book value per share grew $0.66 during the quarter to $25.94 per share. We have built our Bank to withstand uncertain and volatile times, and we continue to make meaningful investments in technology and drive shareholders returns.”

    First Quarter 2025 Results
    (All comparisons refer to the fourth quarter of 2024, except as noted)

    Net income totaled $24.2 million or $0.63 per diluted share, compared to $28.2 million or $0.73 per diluted share. The first quarter’s results were impacted by $10.2 million of provision expense recorded primarily to cover a charge-off on one credit driven by suspected fraudulent activity by the borrower. The return on average tangible assets totaled 1.09%, compared to 1.23%, and the return on average tangible common equity totaled 10.64%, compared to 12.31%.

    Net Interest Income
    Fully taxable equivalent net interest income totaled $88.6 million, compared to $92.0 million, decreasing $3.4 million due to two fewer business days in the first quarter and a decrease of $37.9 million in average earning assets. The fully taxable equivalent net interest margin narrowed six basis points to 3.93%, driven by a 13 basis point decrease in earning asset yields, partially offset by an eight basis point improvement in the cost of funds.

    Loans
    Loans totaled $7.6 billion at March 31, 2025, compared to $7.8 billion. We generated quarterly loan fundings of $255.7 million, led by commercial loan fundings of $160.2 million. The first quarter weighted average rate on new loans at the time of origination was 7.3%, compared to the quarter’s weighted average yield of 6.4% on our loan portfolio.

    Asset Quality and Provision for Credit Losses
    The Company recorded $10.2 million of provision expense for credit losses during the first quarter, compared to $2.0 million. The current quarter’s provision expense was recorded primarily to cover the charge-off on one credit driven by suspected fraudulent activity by the borrower. Annualized net charge-offs totaled 0.80% of average total loans, compared to 0.11%. Non-performing loans decreased one basis point to 0.45% of total loans at March 31, 2025, and non-performing assets decreased one basis point to 0.46% of total loans and OREO at March 31, 2025. The allowance for credit losses as a percentage of loans totaled 1.18% at March 31, 2025, compared to 1.22% at December 31, 2024.

    Deposits
    Average total deposits decreased $111.6 million to $8.3 billion during the first quarter 2025, and average transaction deposits (defined as total deposits less time deposits) decreased $113.1 million to $7.2 billion. Transaction deposits on a spot basis grew $147.7 million to $7.4 billion at March 31, 2025. The loan to deposit ratio totaled 90.8% at March 31, 2025, compared to 94.1%. The mix of transaction deposits to total deposits was 87.4% at March 31, 2025, compared to 87.6%.

    Non-Interest Income
    Non-interest income totaled $15.4 million during the first quarter, compared to $11.1 million. Included in the prior quarter was $6.6 million of non-recurring loss on investment security sales. Mortgage banking income increased $1.0 million, compared to the prior quarter. Service charges and bank card fees decreased $0.7 million due to seasonality, and other non-interest income was $2.6 million lower due to lower SBA gains on sale and swap fee activity during the first quarter.

    Non-Interest Expense
    Non-interest expense decreased $2.5 million to $62.0 million during the first quarter. Salaries and benefits decreased $1.1 million primarily due to payroll tax credits realized in the first quarter. Data processing decreased $0.5 million, and professional services expense decreased $0.2 million driven by our continued disciplined expense management. Included within other non-interest expense in the prior quarter was $1.2 million of banking center consolidation-related expense. The fully taxable equivalent efficiency ratio was 57.7% at March 31, 2025, compared to 57.0%, excluding other intangible assets amortization and the prior quarter’s non-recurring loss on investment security sales.

    Income tax expense decreased $0.9 million to $5.6 million, due to the first quarter’s lower pre-tax income. The effective tax rate was 18.8% for the first quarter, consistent with the prior quarter.

    Capital
    Capital ratios continue to be well in excess of federal bank regulatory agency “well capitalized” thresholds. The tier 1 leverage ratio totaled 10.89%, and the common equity tier 1 capital ratio totaled 13.61% at March 31, 2025. Shareholders’ equity increased $24.2 million to $1.3 billion at March 31, 2025, primarily driven by $13.1 million of growth in retained earnings from net income after covering the quarter’s dividend, and a $10.0 million improvement in accumulated other comprehensive loss due to changes in the interest rate environment.

    Common book value per share increased $0.61 to $34.90 at March 31, 2025. Tangible common book value per share increased $0.66 to $25.94 driven by the quarter’s earnings after covering the quarterly dividend, and a $0.26 improvement in accumulated other comprehensive loss.

    Year-Over-Year Review

    (All comparisons refer to the first quarter of 2024, except as noted)

    Net income totaled $24.2 million, or $0.63 per diluted share, compared to net income of $31.4 million, or $0.82 per diluted share in the same period prior year. The decrease compared to the prior year was largely driven by higher provision expense of $10.2 million. Fully taxable equivalent pre-provision net revenue increased $1.4 million to $42.0 million. The return on average tangible assets totaled 1.09%, compared to 1.39%, and the return on average tangible common equity was 10.64%, compared to 15.14%.

    Fully taxable equivalent net interest income increased $2.9 million to $88.6 million. Average earning assets increased $12.6 million, including average loan growth of $29.3 million and average investment securities growth of $22.6 million. The fully taxable equivalent net interest margin widened 15 basis points to 3.93%, as an 18 basis point decrease in the cost of funds outpaced a three basis point decrease in earning asset yields. Average interest bearing liabilities increased $35.8 million due to higher average deposit balances, and the cost of funds totaled 2.07%, compared to 2.25% in the same period prior year.

    Loans outstanding totaled $7.6 billion as of March 31, 2025, increasing $77.2 million or 1.0%. New loan fundings over the trailing twelve months totaled $1.6 billion, led by commercial fundings of $1.1 billion.

    The Company recorded $10.2 million of provision expense for credit losses, compared to no provision expense for credit losses in the first quarter of 2024. The current quarter’s provision expense was recorded primarily to cover the charge-off on one credit driven by suspected fraudulent activity by the borrower. Annualized net charge-offs totaled 0.80% of average total loans, compared to minimal net charge-offs in the same period prior year. Non-performing loans decreased two basis points to 0.45% of total loans at March 31, 2025, and non-performing assets decreased seven basis points to 0.46% of total loans and OREO at March 31, 2025. The allowance for credit losses as a percentage of loans totaled 1.18% at March 31, 2025, compared to 1.29% at March 31, 2024.

    Average total deposits increased $41.5 million or 0.5% to $8.3 billion, and average transaction deposits decreased $4.5 million. The mix of transaction deposits to total deposits was 87.4% at March 31, 2025, compared to 88.3%.

    Non-interest income totaled $15.4 million, compared to $17.7 million, decreasing primarily due to $2.3 million lower other non-interest income driven by timing of SBA loan gain on sales and swap fee income activity, and a $0.6 million gain from the sale of a banking center building included in the first quarter of 2024.

    Non-interest expense decreased $0.8 million to $62.0 million. Salaries and benefits decreased $2.2 million primarily due to payroll tax credits realized during the first quarter 2025, which was partially offset by increases in data processing and occupancy and equipment, driven by investments in technology.

    Income tax expense totaled $5.6 million, a decrease of $1.9 million, driven by lower pre-tax income. The effective tax rate was 18.8%, compared to 19.3% in the first quarter of 2024.

    Conference Call
    Management will host a conference call to review the results at 11:00 a.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, April 23, 2025. Interested parties may listen to this call by dialing (877) 400-0505 using the participant passcode of 7036929 and asking for the NBHC Q1 2025 Earnings Call. The earnings release and a link to the replay of the call will be available on the Company’s website at www.nationalbankholdings.com by visiting the investor relations area.

    About National Bank Holdings Corporation
    National Bank Holdings Corporation is a bank holding company created to build a leading community bank franchise, delivering high quality client service and committed to stakeholder results. Through its bank subsidiaries, NBH Bank and Bank of Jackson Hole Trust, National Bank Holdings Corporation operates a network of over 90 banking centers, serving individual consumers, small, medium and large businesses, and government and non-profit entities. Its banking centers are located in its core footprint of Colorado, the greater Kansas City region, Utah, Wyoming, Texas, New Mexico and Idaho. Its comprehensive residential mortgage banking group primarily serves the bank’s core footprint. Its trust and wealth management business is operated in its core footprint under the Bank of Jackson Hole Trust charter. NBH Bank operates under a single state charter through the following brand names as divisions of NBH Bank: in Colorado, Community Banks of Colorado and Community Banks Mortgage; in Kansas and Missouri, Bank Midwest and Bank Midwest Mortgage; in Texas, Utah, New Mexico and Idaho, Hillcrest Bank and Hillcrest Bank Mortgage; and in Wyoming, Bank of Jackson Hole and Bank of Jackson Hole Mortgage. Additional information about National Bank Holdings Corporation can be found at www.nationalbankholdings.com.

    For more information visit: cobnks.com, bankmw.com, hillcrestbank.com, bankofjacksonhole.com, or nbhbank.com, or connect with any of our brands on LinkedIn.

    About Non-GAAP Financial Measures
    Certain of the financial measures and ratios we present, including “adjusted return on average assets,” “tangible assets,” “return on average tangible assets,” “adjusted return on average equity,” “tangible common equity,” “return on average tangible common equity,” “tangible common book value per share,” “tangible common equity to tangible assets,” “non-interest expense excluding other intangible assets amortization,” “non-interest income adjusted for the loss on security sales,” “efficiency ratio excluding other intangible assets amortization, adjusted for the loss on security sales,” “adjusted net income,” “adjusted earnings per share – diluted,” “net income excluding the impact of other intangible assets amortization expense, adjusted for the loss on security sales, after tax,” “net income adjusted for the loss on security sales, after tax,” “net income excluding the impact of other intangible assets amortization expense, after tax,” “adjusted return on average tangible assets,” “adjusted return on average tangible common equity,” “pre-provision net revenue,” “pre-provision net revenue, adjusted for the loss on security sales,” and “fully taxable equivalent” metrics, are supplemental measures that are not required by, or are not presented in accordance with, U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). We refer to these financial measures and ratios as “non-GAAP financial measures.” We consider the use of select non-GAAP financial measures and ratios to be useful for financial and operational decision making and useful in evaluating period-to-period comparisons. We believe that these non-GAAP financial measures provide meaningful supplemental information regarding our performance by excluding certain expenditures or assets that we believe are not indicative of our primary business operating results or by presenting certain metrics on a fully taxable equivalent basis. We believe that management and investors benefit from referring to these non-GAAP financial measures in assessing our performance and when planning, forecasting, analyzing and comparing past, present and future periods.

    These non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered a substitute for financial information presented in accordance with GAAP and you should not rely on non-GAAP financial measures alone as measures of our performance. The non-GAAP financial measures we present may differ from non-GAAP financial measures used by our peers or other companies. We compensate for these limitations by providing the equivalent GAAP measures whenever we present the non-GAAP financial measures and by including a reconciliation of the impact of the components adjusted for in the non-GAAP financial measure so that both measures and the individual components may be considered when analyzing our performance. A reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures to the comparable GAAP financial measures is included at the end of the financial statement tables.

    Forward-Looking Statements
    This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements do not discuss historical facts but instead relate to expectations, beliefs, plans, predictions, forecasts, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance. Forward-looking statements are generally identified by words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “can,” “would,” “should,” “could,” “may,” “predict,” “seek,” “potential,” “will,” “estimate,” “target,” “plan,” “project,” “continuing,” “ongoing,” “expect,” “intend,” “goal,” “focus,” “maintains,” “future,” “ultimately, ” “likely,” “anticipate,” “ensure,” “strategy,” “objective,” and similar words or phrases. These statements are only predictions and involve estimates, known and unknown risks, assumptions and uncertainties. We have based these statements largely on our current expectations and projections about future events and financial trends that we believe may affect our financial condition, liquidity, results of operations, business strategy and growth prospects. Forward-looking statements involve certain important risks, uncertainties and other factors, any of which could cause actual results to differ materially from those in such statements and, therefore, you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ from those discussed in the forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to: business and economic conditions along with external events both generally and in the financial services industry; susceptibility to credit risk and fluctuations in the value of real estate and other collateral securing a significant portion of our loan portfolio, including with regards to real estate acquired through foreclosure, and the accuracy of appraisals related to such real estate; the allowance for credit losses and fair value adjustments may be insufficient to absorb losses in our loan portfolio; our ability to maintain sufficient liquidity to meet the requirements of deposit withdrawals and other business needs; changes impacting monetary supply and the businesses of our clients and counterparties, including levels of market interest rates, inflation, currency values, monetary and fiscal policies, and the volatility of trading markets; changes in the fair value of our investment securities and the ability of companies in which we invest to commercialize their technology or product concepts; the loss of certain executive officers and key personnel; any service interruptions, cyber incidents or other breaches relating to our technology systems, security systems or infrastructure or those of our third-party providers; the occurrence of fraud or other financial crimes within our business; competition from other financial institutions and financial services providers and the effects of disintermediation within the banking business including consolidation within the industry; changes to federal government lending programs like the Small Business Administration’s Preferred Lender Program and the Federal Housing Administration’s insurance programs, including the impact of a government shutdown on such programs; impairment of our mortgage servicing rights, disruption in the secondary market for mortgage loans, declines in real estate values, or being required to repurchase mortgage loans or reimburse investors; developments in technology, such as artificial intelligence, the success of our digital growth strategy, and our ability to incorporate innovative technologies in our business and provide products and services that satisfy our clients’ expectations for convenience and security; our ability to execute our organic growth and acquisition strategies; the accuracy of projected operating results for assets and businesses we acquire as well as our ability to drive organic loan growth to replace loans in our existing portfolio with comparable loans as loans are paid down; changes to federal, state and local laws and regulations along with executive orders applicable to our business, including tax laws; our ability to comply with and manage costs related to extensive government regulation and supervision, including current and future regulations affecting bank holding companies and depository institutions; the application of any increased assessment rates imposed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”); claims or legal action brought against us by third parties or government agencies; and other factors, risks, trends and uncertainties described elsewhere in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). The forward-looking statements are made as of the date of this press release, and we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which the statement is made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events or circumstances, except as required by applicable law.

    Contacts:
    Analysts/Institutional Investors:
    Emily Gooden, Chief Accounting Officer and Investor Relations Director, (720) 554-6640, ir@nationalbankholdings.com
    Nicole Van Denabeele, Chief Financial Officer, (720) 529-3370, ir@nationalbankholdings.com

    Media:
    Jody Soper, Chief Marketing Officer, (303) 784-5925, Jody.Soper@nbhbank.com

     
    NATIONAL BANK HOLDINGS CORPORATION
    FINANCIAL SUMMARY
    Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)
    (Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)
                         
      For the three months ended
      March 31,   December 31,    March 31, 
      2025   2024    2024
    Total interest and dividend income $ 129,963     $ 136,086     $ 131,732  
    Total interest expense   43,272       45,955       47,702  
    Net interest income   86,691       90,131       84,030  
    Taxable equivalent adjustment   1,910       1,874       1,692  
    Net interest income FTE(1)   88,601       92,005       85,722  
    Provision expense for credit losses   10,200       1,979        
    Net interest income after provision for credit losses FTE(1)   78,401       90,026       85,722  
    Non-interest income:                    
    Service charges   4,118       4,359       4,391  
    Bank card fees   4,194       4,671       4,578  
    Mortgage banking income   3,315       2,296       2,655  
    Other non-interest income   3,749       6,375       6,070  
    Loss on security sales         (6,582 )      
    Total non-interest income   15,376       11,119       17,694  
    Non-interest expense:                    
    Salaries and benefits   34,362       35,459       36,520  
    Occupancy and equipment   10,837       10,193       9,941  
    Professional fees   1,423       1,599       1,646  
    Data processing   4,401       4,900       4,066  
    Other non-interest expense   9,017       10,418       8,653  
    Other intangible assets amortization   1,977       1,977       2,008  
    Total non-interest expense   62,017       64,546       62,834  
                         
    Income before income taxes FTE(1)   31,760       36,599       40,582  
    Taxable equivalent adjustment   1,910       1,874       1,692  
    Income before income taxes   29,850       34,725       38,890  
    Income tax expense   5,619       6,541       7,499  
    Net income $ 24,231     $ 28,184     $ 31,391  
    Earnings per share – basic $ 0.63     $ 0.73     $ 0.82  
    Earnings per share – diluted   0.63       0.73       0.82  
    Common stock dividend   0.29       0.29       0.27  

                                                          

    (1)   Net interest income is presented on a GAAP basis and fully taxable equivalent (FTE) basis, as the Company believes this non-GAAP measure is the preferred industry measurement for this item. The FTE adjustment is for the tax benefit on certain tax exempt loans using the federal tax rate of 21% for each period presented.
         
     
    NATIONAL BANK HOLDINGS CORPORATION
    Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition (Unaudited)
    (Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)
                     
      March 31, 2025   December 31, 2024   March 31, 2024
    ASSETS                
    Cash and cash equivalents $ 246,298     $ 127,848     $ 292,931  
    Investment securities available-for-sale   634,376       527,547       685,666  
    Investment securities held-to-maturity   706,912       533,108       570,850  
    Non-marketable securities   76,203       76,462       73,439  
    Loans   7,646,296       7,751,143       7,569,052  
    Allowance for credit losses   (90,192 )     (94,455 )     (97,607 )
    Loans, net   7,556,104       7,656,688       7,471,445  
    Loans held for sale   11,885       24,495       14,065  
    Other real estate owned   615       662       4,064  
    Premises and equipment, net   204,567       196,773       168,956  
    Goodwill   306,043       306,043       306,043  
    Intangible assets, net   54,489       58,432       64,212  
    Other assets   301,378       299,635       315,805  
    Total assets $ 10,098,870     $ 9,807,693     $ 9,967,476  
    LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY                
    Liabilities:                
    Non-interest bearing demand deposits $ 2,215,313     $ 2,213,685     $ 2,292,917  
    Interest bearing demand deposits   1,337,905       1,411,860       1,427,856  
    Savings and money market   3,812,312       3,592,312       3,801,013  
    Total transaction deposits   7,365,530       7,217,857       7,521,786  
    Time deposits   1,058,677       1,020,036       995,976  
    Total deposits   8,424,207       8,237,893       8,517,762  
    Securities sold under agreements to repurchase   20,749       18,895       19,577  
    Long-term debt   54,588       54,511       54,278  
    Federal Home Loan Bank advances   80,000       50,000        
    Other liabilities   190,018       141,319       144,029  
    Total liabilities   8,769,562       8,502,618       8,735,646  
    Shareholders’ equity:                
    Common stock   515       515       515  
    Additional paid in capital   1,168,433       1,167,431       1,163,773  
    Retained earnings   521,939       508,864       454,211  
    Treasury stock   (301,531 )     (301,694 )     (306,460 )
    Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax   (60,048 )     (70,041 )     (80,209 )
    Total shareholders’ equity   1,329,308       1,305,075       1,231,830  
    Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity $ 10,098,870     $ 9,807,693     $ 9,967,476  
    SHARE DATA                
    Average basic shares outstanding   38,068,455       38,327,964       38,031,358  
    Average diluted shares outstanding   38,229,869       38,565,164       38,188,480  
    Ending shares outstanding   38,094,105       38,054,482       37,806,148  
    Common book value per share $ 34.90     $ 34.29     $ 32.58  
    Tangible common book value per share(1) (non-GAAP)   25.94       25.28       23.32  
    CAPITAL RATIOS                
    Average equity to average assets   13.35 %     13.10 %     12.40 %
    Tangible common equity to tangible assets(1)   10.13 %     10.16 %     9.17 %
    Tier 1 leverage ratio   10.89 %     10.69 %     9.99 %
    Common equity tier 1 risk-based capital ratio   13.61 %     13.20 %     12.35 %
    Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio   13.61 %     13.20 %     12.35 %
    Total risk-based capital ratio   15.49 %     15.11 %     14.30 %

                                                          

    (1)   Represents a non-GAAP financial measure. See non-GAAP reconciliations below.
         
     
    NATIONAL BANK HOLDINGS CORPORATION
    Loan Portfolio
    (Dollars in thousands)
     
    Period End Loan Balances by Type
                                   
              March 31, 2025       March 31, 2025
              vs. December 31, 2024       vs. March 31, 2024
      March 31, 2025   December 31, 2024   % Change   March 31, 2024   % Change
    Originated:                              
    Commercial:                              
    Commercial and industrial $ 1,871,301     $ 1,881,570     (0.5 )%   $ 1,777,328     5.3 %
    Municipal and non-profit   1,116,724       1,106,865     0.9 %     1,062,287     5.1 %
    Owner-occupied commercial real estate   1,026,692       1,048,481     (2.1 )%     875,303     17.3 %
    Food and agribusiness   251,120       266,332     (5.7 )%     241,654     3.9 %
    Total commercial   4,265,837       4,303,248     (0.9 )%     3,956,572     7.8 %
    Commercial real estate non-owner occupied   1,136,176       1,123,718     1.1 %     1,092,780     4.0 %
    Residential real estate   915,139       922,328     (0.8 )%     923,103     (0.9 )%
    Consumer   11,955       12,773     (6.4 )%     14,936     (20.0 )%
    Total originated   6,329,107       6,362,067     (0.5 )%     5,987,391     5.7 %
                                   
    Acquired:                              
    Commercial:                              
    Commercial and industrial   105,493       114,255     (7.7 )%     132,532     (20.4 )%
    Municipal and non-profit   271       277     (2.2 )%     294     (7.8 )%
    Owner-occupied commercial real estate   198,339       215,663     (8.0 )%     234,486     (15.4 )%
    Food and agribusiness   33,831       36,987     (8.5 )%     57,896     (41.6 )%
    Total commercial   337,934       367,182     (8.0 )%     425,208     (20.5 )%
    Commercial real estate non-owner occupied   659,680       688,620     (4.2 )%     767,419     (14.0 )%
    Residential real estate   318,510       331,510     (3.9 )%     387,101     (17.7 )%
    Consumer   1,065       1,764     (39.6 )%     1,933     (44.9 )%
    Total acquired   1,317,189       1,389,076     (5.2 )%     1,581,661     (16.7 )%
    Total loans $ 7,646,296     $ 7,751,143     (1.4 )%   $ 7,569,052     1.0 %
    Loan Fundings(1)
                                         
      First quarter   Fourth quarter   Third quarter   Second quarter   First quarter
      2025   2024   2024   2024   2024  
    Commercial:                                    
    Commercial and industrial $ 108,594     $ 146,600     $ 93,711     $ 241,910     $ 53,978  
    Municipal and non-profit   12,506       49,175       35,677       28,785       14,564  
    Owner occupied commercial real estate   37,762       117,850       70,517       102,615       35,128  
    Food and agribusiness   1,338       15,796       19,205       11,040       (7,204 )
    Total commercial   160,200       329,421       219,110       384,350       96,466  
    Commercial real estate non-owner occupied   65,254       119,132       91,809       83,184       73,789  
    Residential real estate   29,300       30,750       47,322       36,124       29,468  
    Consumer   970       726       1,010       1,547       234  
    Total $ 255,724     $ 480,029     $ 359,251     $ 505,205     $ 199,957  

                                                          

    (1)   Loan fundings are defined as closed end funded loans and net fundings under revolving lines of credit. Net fundings (paydowns) under revolving lines of credit were $21,752, $64,375, $16,302, $19,281 and ($59,523) for the periods noted in the table above, respectively.
         
     
    NATIONAL BANK HOLDINGS CORPORATION
    Summary of Net Interest Margin
    (Dollars in thousands)
                                                           
        For the three months ended   For the three months ended   For the three months ended
        March 31, 2025   December 31, 2024   March 31, 2024
        Average         Average   Average         Average   Average         Average
        balance   Interest   rate   balance   Interest   rate   balance   Interest   rate
    Interest earning assets:                                                      
    Originated loans FTE(1)(2)   $ 6,335,931     $ 102,221     6.54 %   $ 6,368,697     $ 107,400     6.71 %   $ 6,046,849     $ 100,914     6.71 %
    Acquired loans     1,351,726       19,547     5.86 %     1,425,344       22,253     6.21 %     1,611,521       24,289     6.06 %
    Loans held for sale     19,756       349     7.16 %     20,196       320     6.30 %     12,017       225     7.53 %
    Investment securities available-for-sale     716,938       4,617     2.58 %     735,977       3,196     1.74 %     751,168       4,103     2.18 %
    Investment securities held-to-maturity     635,961       4,120     2.59 %     537,970       3,887     2.89 %     579,160       2,514     1.74 %
    Other securities     31,386       480     6.12 %     29,256       434     5.93 %     35,036       616     7.03 %
    Interest earning deposits     48,206       539     4.53 %     60,400       470     3.10 %     91,579       763     3.35 %
    Total interest earning assets FTE(2)   $ 9,139,904     $ 131,873     5.85 %   $ 9,177,840     $ 137,960     5.98 %   $ 9,127,330     $ 133,424     5.88 %
    Cash and due from banks   $ 77,237                 $ 81,371                 $ 102,583              
    Other assets     794,374                   793,734                   756,230              
    Allowance for credit losses     (95,492 )                 (95,750 )                 (97,882 )            
    Total assets   $ 9,916,023                 $ 9,957,195                 $ 9,888,261              
    Interest bearing liabilities:                                                      
    Interest bearing demand, savings and money market deposits   $ 5,027,052     $ 32,511     2.62 %   $ 5,087,799     $ 35,443     2.77 %   $ 4,947,811     $ 36,413     2.96 %
    Time deposits     1,035,983       8,756     3.43 %     1,034,560       9,169     3.53 %     990,041       7,584     3.08 %
    Federal Home Loan Bank advances     107,151       1,105     4.18 %     66,428       820     4.91 %     228,236       3,181     5.61 %
    Other borrowings(3)     50,277       382     3.08 %     18,374       5     0.11 %     18,929       6     0.13 %
    Long-term debt     54,539       518     3.85 %     54,464       518     3.78 %     54,229       518     3.84 %
    Total interest bearing liabilities   $ 6,275,002     $ 43,272     2.80 %   $ 6,261,625     $ 45,955     2.92 %   $ 6,239,246     $ 47,702     3.07 %
    Demand deposits   $ 2,197,300                 $ 2,249,614                 $ 2,280,997              
    Other liabilities     119,806                   141,327                   141,735              
    Total liabilities     8,592,108                   8,652,566                   8,661,978              
    Shareholders’ equity     1,323,915                   1,304,629                   1,226,283              
    Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity   $ 9,916,023                 $ 9,957,195                 $ 9,888,261              
    Net interest income FTE(2)         $ 88,601               $ 92,005               $ 85,722      
    Interest rate spread FTE(2)                 3.05 %                 3.06 %                 2.81 %
    Net interest earning assets   $ 2,864,902                 $ 2,916,215                 $ 2,888,084              
    Net interest margin FTE(2)                 3.93 %                 3.99 %                 3.78 %
    Average transaction deposits   $ 7,224,352                 $ 7,337,413                 $ 7,228,808              
    Average total deposits     8,260,335                   8,371,973                   8,218,849              
    Ratio of average interest earning assets to average interest bearing liabilities     145.66 %                 146.57 %                 146.29 %            

                                                          

    (1)   Originated loans are net of deferred loan fees, less costs, which are included in interest income over the life of the loan.
    (2)   Presented on a fully taxable equivalent basis using the statutory tax rate of 21%. The tax equivalent adjustments included above are $1,910, $1,874 and $1,692 for the three months ended March 31, 2025, December 31, 2024 and March 31, 2024, respectively.
    (3)   Other borrowings includes securities sold under agreements to repurchase and cash collateral received from counterparties in connection with derivative swap agreements.
         
     
    NATIONAL BANK HOLDINGS CORPORATION
    Allowance for Credit Losses and Asset Quality
    (Dollars in thousands)
     
    Allowance for Credit Losses Analysis
                     
      As of and for the three months ended
      March 31, 2025   December 31, 2024   March 31, 2024
    Beginning allowance for credit losses $ 94,455     $ 95,047     $ 97,947  
    Charge-offs   (15,251 )     (2,391 )     (278 )
    Recoveries   138       175       188  
    Provision expense (release) for credit losses   10,850       1,624       (250 )
    Ending allowance for credit losses (“ACL”) $ 90,192     $ 94,455     $ 97,607  
    Ratio of annualized net charge-offs to average total loans during the period   0.80 %     0.11 %     0.00 %
    Ratio of ACL to total loans outstanding at period end   1.18 %     1.22 %     1.29 %
    Ratio of ACL to total non-performing loans at period end   260.52 %     262.42 %     272.52 %
    Total loans $ 7,646,296     $ 7,751,143     $ 7,569,052  
    Average total loans during the period   7,660,974       7,772,712       7,632,635  
    Total non-performing loans   34,620       35,994       35,817  
    Past Due and Non-accrual Loans
                     
      March 31, 2025   December 31, 2024   March 31, 2024
    Loans 30-89 days past due and still accruing interest $ 17,003     $ 23,164     $ 3,495  
    Loans 90 days past due and still accruing interest   1,012       14,940       1  
    Non-accrual loans   34,620       35,994       35,817  
    Total past due and non-accrual loans $ 52,635     $ 74,098     $ 39,313  
    Total 90 days past due and still accruing interest and non-accrual loans to total loans   0.47 %     0.66 %     0.47 %
    Asset Quality Data
                     
      March 31, 2025   December 31, 2024   March 31, 2024
    Non-performing loans $ 34,620     $ 35,994     $ 35,817  
    OREO   615       662       4,064  
    Total non-performing assets $ 35,235     $ 36,656     $ 39,881  
    Total non-performing loans to total loans   0.45 %     0.46 %     0.47 %
    Total non-performing assets to total loans and OREO   0.46 %     0.47 %     0.53 %
                           
     
    NATIONAL BANK HOLDINGS CORPORATION
    Key Metrics(1)
                     
      As of and for the three months ended
      March 31,   December 31,    March 31, 
      2025   2024   2024
    Return on average assets   0.99 %     1.13 %     1.28 %
    Return on average tangible assets(2)   1.09 %     1.23 %     1.39 %
    Return on average tangible assets, adjusted(2)   1.09 %     1.44 %     1.39 %
    Return on average equity   7.42 %     8.59 %     10.30 %
    Return on average tangible common equity(2)   10.64 %     12.31 %     15.14 %
    Return on average tangible common equity, adjusted(2)   10.64 %     14.40 %     15.14 %
    Loan to deposit ratio (end of period)   90.77 %     94.09 %     88.86 %
    Non-interest bearing deposits to total deposits (end of period)   26.30 %     26.87 %     26.92 %
    Net interest margin(3)   3.85 %     3.91 %     3.70 %
    Net interest margin FTE(2)(3)   3.93 %     3.99 %     3.78 %
    Interest rate spread FTE(2)(4)   3.05 %     3.06 %     2.81 %
    Yield on earning assets(5)   5.77 %     5.90 %     5.80 %
    Yield on earning assets FTE(2)(5)   5.85 %     5.98 %     5.88 %
    Cost of funds   2.07 %     2.15 %     2.25 %
    Cost of deposits   2.03 %     2.12 %     2.15 %
    Non-interest income to total revenue FTE(6)   14.79 %     10.78 %     17.11 %
    Efficiency ratio   60.76 %     63.75 %     61.77 %
    Efficiency ratio excluding other intangible assets amortization FTE, adjusted(2)   57.74 %     57.03 %     58.82 %
    Pre-provision net revenue $ 40,050     $ 36,704     $ 38,890  
    Pre-provision net revenue FTE(2)   41,960       38,578       40,582  
    Pre-provision net revenue FTE, adjusted(2)   41,960       45,160       40,582  
                     
    Total Loans Asset Quality Data(7)(8)                
    Non-performing loans to total loans   0.45 %     0.46 %     0.47 %
    Non-performing assets to total loans and OREO   0.46 %     0.47 %     0.53 %
    Allowance for credit losses to total loans   1.18 %     1.22 %     1.29 %
    Allowance for credit losses to non-performing loans   260.52 %     262.42 %     272.52 %
    Net charge-offs to average loans   0.80 %     0.11 %     0.00 %

                                                          

    (1)   Ratios are annualized.
    (2)   Ratio represents non-GAAP financial measure. See non-GAAP reconciliations below.
    (3)   Net interest margin represents net interest income, including accretion income on interest earning assets, as a percentage of average interest earning assets.
    (4)   Interest rate spread represents the difference between the weighted average yield on interest earning assets, including FTE income, and the weighted average cost of interest bearing liabilities. Ratio represents a non-GAAP financial measure.
    (5)   Interest earning assets include assets that earn interest/accretion or dividends. Any market value adjustments on investment securities or loans are excluded from interest earning assets.
    (6)   Non-interest income to total revenue represents non-interest income divided by the sum of net interest income FTE and non-interest income. Ratio represents a non-GAAP financial measure.
    (7)   Non-performing loans consist of non-accruing loans and modified loans on non-accrual.
    (8)   Total loans are net of unearned discounts and fees.
         
     
    NATIONAL BANK HOLDINGS CORPORATION
    NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES AND RECONCILIATIONS
    (Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)
     
    Tangible Common Book Value Ratios
                       
        March 31, 2025   December 31, 2024   March 31, 2024
    Total shareholders’ equity   $ 1,329,308     $ 1,305,075     $ 1,231,830  
    Less: goodwill and other intangible assets, net     (354,800 )     (356,777 )     (362,709 )
    Add: deferred tax liability related to goodwill     13,638       13,535       12,539  
    Tangible common equity (non-GAAP)   $ 988,146     $ 961,833     $ 881,660  
                       
    Total assets   $ 10,098,870     $ 9,807,693     $ 9,967,476  
    Less: goodwill and other intangible assets, net     (354,800 )     (356,777 )     (362,709 )
    Add: deferred tax liability related to goodwill     13,638       13,535       12,539  
    Tangible assets (non-GAAP)   $ 9,757,708     $ 9,464,451     $ 9,617,306  
                       
    Tangible common equity to tangible assets calculations:                  
    Total shareholders’ equity to total assets     13.16 %     13.31 %     12.36 %
    Less: impact of goodwill and other intangible assets, net     (3.03 )%     (3.15 )%     (3.19 )%
    Tangible common equity to tangible assets (non-GAAP)     10.13 %     10.16 %     9.17 %
                       
    Tangible common book value per share calculations:                  
    Tangible common equity (non-GAAP)   $ 988,146     $ 961,833     $ 881,660  
    Divided by: ending shares outstanding     38,094,105       38,054,482       37,806,148  
    Tangible common book value per share (non-GAAP)   $ 25.94     $ 25.28     $ 23.32  
                             
     
    NATIONAL BANK HOLDINGS CORPORATION
    (Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)
    Return on Average Tangible Assets and Return on Average Tangible Equity
                       
        As of and for the three months ended
        March 31,   December 31,    March 31, 
        2025   2024   2024
    Net income   $ 24,231     $ 28,184     $ 31,391  
    Add: loss on security sales, after tax (non-GAAP)(1)           5,048        
    Net income adjusted for the loss on security sales, after tax (non-GAAP)(1)   $ 24,231     $ 33,232     $ 31,391  
                       
    Net income   $ 24,231     $ 28,184     $ 31,391  
    Add: impact of other intangible assets amortization expense, after tax     1,516       1,516       1,534  
    Net income excluding the impact of other intangible assets amortization expense, after tax (non-GAAP)   $ 25,747     $ 29,700     $ 32,925  
                       
    Net income excluding the impact of other intangible assets amortization expense, after tax   $ 25,747     $ 29,700     $ 32,925  
    Add: loss on security sales, after tax (non-GAAP)(1)           5,048        
    Net income excluding the impact of other intangible assets amortization expense, adjusted for the loss on security sales, after tax (non-GAAP)(1)   $ 25,747     $ 34,748     $ 32,925  
                       
    Average assets   $ 9,916,023     $ 9,957,195     $ 9,888,261  
    Less: average goodwill and other intangible assets, net of deferred tax liability related to goodwill     (342,425 )     (344,417 )     (351,383 )
    Average tangible assets (non-GAAP)   $ 9,573,598     $ 9,612,778     $ 9,536,878  
                       
    Average shareholders’ equity   $ 1,323,915     $ 1,304,629     $ 1,226,283  
    Less: average goodwill and other intangible assets, net of deferred tax liability related to goodwill     (342,425 )     (344,417 )     (351,383 )
    Average tangible common equity (non-GAAP)   $ 981,490     $ 960,212     $ 874,900  
                       
    Return on average assets     0.99 %     1.13 %     1.28 %
    Adjusted return on average assets (non-GAAP)     0.99 %     1.33 %     1.28 %
    Return on average tangible assets (non-GAAP)     1.09 %     1.23 %     1.39 %
    Adjusted return on average tangible assets (non-GAAP)     1.09 %     1.44 %     1.39 %
    Return on average equity     7.42 %     8.59 %     10.30 %
    Adjusted return on average equity (non-GAAP)     7.42 %     10.13 %     10.30 %
    Return on average tangible common equity (non-GAAP)     10.64 %     12.31 %     15.14 %
    Adjusted return on average tangible common equity (non-GAAP)     10.64 %     14.40 %     15.14 %
                       
    (1) Adjustments:                  
    Loss on security sales (non-GAAP)   $     $ 6,582     $  
    Tax benefit impact           (1,534 )      
    Total adjustments, after tax (non-GAAP)   $     $ 5,048     $  
    Fully Taxable Equivalent Yield on Earning Assets and Net Interest Margin
                       
        As of and for the three months ended
        March 31,   December 31,    March 31, 
        2025   2024   2024
    Interest income   $ 129,963     $ 136,086     $ 131,732  
    Add: impact of taxable equivalent adjustment     1,910       1,874       1,692  
    Interest income FTE (non-GAAP)   $ 131,873     $ 137,960     $ 133,424  
                       
    Net interest income   $ 86,691     $ 90,131     $ 84,030  
    Add: impact of taxable equivalent adjustment     1,910       1,874       1,692  
    Net interest income FTE (non-GAAP)   $ 88,601     $ 92,005     $ 85,722  
                       
    Average earning assets   $ 9,139,904     $ 9,177,840     $ 9,127,330  
    Yield on earning assets     5.77 %     5.90 %     5.80 %
    Yield on earning assets FTE (non-GAAP)     5.85 %     5.98 %     5.88 %
    Net interest margin     3.85 %     3.91 %     3.70 %
    Net interest margin FTE (non-GAAP)     3.93 %     3.99 %     3.78 %
    Efficiency Ratio and Pre-Provision Net Revenue
                       
        As of and for the three months ended
        March 31,   December 31,    March 31, 
        2025   2024   2024
    Net interest income   $ 86,691     $ 90,131     $ 84,030  
    Add: impact of taxable equivalent adjustment     1,910       1,874       1,692  
    Net interest income FTE (non-GAAP)   $ 88,601     $ 92,005     $ 85,722  
                       
    Non-interest income   $ 15,376     $ 11,119     $ 17,694  
    Add: loss on security sales (non-GAAP)           6,582        
    Non-interest income adjusted for the loss on security sales (non-GAAP)   $ 15,376     $ 17,701     $ 17,694  
                       
    Non-interest expense   $ 62,017     $ 64,546     $ 62,834  
    Less: other intangible assets amortization     (1,977 )     (1,977 )     (2,008 )
    Non-interest expense excluding other intangible assets amortization (non-GAAP)   $ 60,040     $ 62,569     $ 60,826  
                       
    Efficiency ratio     60.76 %     63.75 %     61.77 %
    Efficiency ratio FTE (non-GAAP)     59.64 %     62.59 %     60.76 %
    Efficiency ratio excluding other intangible assets amortization, adjusted for the loss on security sales FTE (non-GAAP)     57.74 %     57.03 %     58.82 %
    Pre-provision net revenue (non-GAAP)   $ 40,050     $ 36,704     $ 38,890  
    Pre-provision net revenue, FTE (non-GAAP)     41,960       38,578       40,582  
    Pre-provision net revenue FTE, adjusted for the loss on security sales (non-GAAP)     41,960       45,160       40,582  
    Adjusted Net Income and Earnings Per Share
                             
        As of and for the three months ended
        March 31,   December 31,    March 31, 
        2025   2024   2024
    Adjustments to net income:                        
    Net income   $ 24,231     $ 28,184     $ 31,391  
    Add: adjustment for the loss on security sales, after tax (non-GAAP)           5,048        
    Adjusted net income (non-GAAP)   $ 24,231     $ 33,232     $ 31,391  
                             
    Adjustments to earnings per share:                        
    Earnings per share diluted   $ 0.63     $ 0.73     $ 0.82  
    Add: adjustment for the loss on security sales, after tax (non-GAAP)           0.13        
    Adjusted earnings per share – diluted (non-GAAP)   $ 0.63     $ 0.86     $ 0.82  
                             

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI USA: Congresswoman Cherfilus-McCormick Statement on Reorganization of State Department

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congresswoman Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick (D-Florida 20th district))

    WASHINGTON, DC – Today, Congresswoman Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick (D-FL), Ranking Member of the House Foreign Affairs Middle East and North Africa Subcommittee, issued the following statement on the Administration’s reorganization of the State Department.

    “I have grave concerns that such a sweeping overhaul of the State Department will have a devastating impact on America’s standing and be felt in every corner of the globe. 

    “We have reached a critical juncture — one in which our allies have rapidly lost faith in our security commitments and our trading partners are worried about the U.S. economy. Confidence in America is slipping. This move — coming on the heels of chaotic tariff negotiations, our diminished role in international alliances, and China openly mocking the U.S. on social media — could appear as a retreat. 

    “At this moment, when so many fear that they cannot count on America, the last thing we should be doing is upending our diplomatic footprint. We should be living up to our commitments, not continually reneging on them. We also should serve and protect American families abroad, while protecting our national security at home. 

    “As I have emphasized, I am open to reforms where necessary — but these proposals must be approached with caution and in close consultation with Congress.”

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-Evening Report: Lest we forget? Aside from Anzac Day, NZ has been slow to remember its military veterans

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Alexander Gillespie, Professor of Law, University of Waikato

    Fiona Goodall/Getty Images

    Following some very public protests, including Victoria Cross recipient
    Willie Apiata handing back his medal, the government’s announcement of an expanded official definition of the term “veteran” brings some good news for former military personnel ahead of this year’s ANZAC Day.

    The change will add roughly 100,000 service people and remove an anomaly that favoured those who served overseas, unless they served in New Zealand before 1974 when the Accident Compensation Corporation was founded. The new definition will not automatically change existing entitlements, but the government has expressed commitment to improving veterans’ support.

    The government will also establish a new national day of tribute for veterans. This falls somewhat short of a recommendation from the 2018 independent review of the Veterans’ Support Act which stated the government should accept it has a “moral duty of care to veterans”. But if adopted, this would create a missing ethical compass all democracies should have to acknowledge responsibilities to those who risked everything in service of their country.

    The same report also recommended better financial support for veterans, but so far the government has been reluctant to review the adequacy of veterans’ pensions.

    None of this is particularly surprising, given New Zealand’s history of sending people to fight and then rejecting their claims for recognition and compensation when the war is over.

    Some of this may also come to light in the Waitangi Tribunal’s current Military Veterans Kaupapa Inquiry, with potentially strong evidence of discrimination against Māori service personnel in particular.

    Sacrifice and compensation

    When New Zealand gave out its first military pensions in 1866, only the victors of the New Zealand Wars received them. For Māori allies, equity was missing. Pro-government Māori troops were eligible, but at a lower rate than Pākehā veterans.

    It was only in 1903 that specialist facilities such as the Ranfurly war veterans’ home in Auckland were created.

    The initial treatments for those who suffered “shell shock”, especially in the first world war, were atrocious. Their placement in mental institutions only ended following public outcry.

    Some veterans of the New Zealand Wars were compensated by being granted confiscated Māori land. It wasn’t until 1915 that a new system was formalised.

    This provided farm settlement schemes and vocational training for first world war veterans. The balloted farmland was largely exclusionary as Māori veterans were assumed to have tribal land already available to them.

    The rehabilitation of disabled service personnel dates back to the 1930s, before being formally legislated in 1941. But the focus faded over the following decades, with the specific status of veterans blurring as they were lumped in with more generic welfare goals.

    It took until 1964 for the government to pay war pensions to those who served in Jayforce, the 12,000-strong New Zealand troops stationed in Japan as part of the postwar occupation from 1946 to 1948.

    From atomic tests to Agent Orange

    British hydrogen bombs were tested over Kiritimati in 1957.
    Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA

    A decade later, more than 500 New Zealand navy personnel took part in Operation Grapple, the British hydrogen bomb tests near Kiribati in 1957–58. Despite evidence of a variety of health problems – including cancer, premature death and deformities in children – it was not until 1990 that the government extended coverage of benefits to veterans who had contracted some specific listed conditions.

    It took another eight years before the government broadened the evidence requirements and accepted service in Operation Grapple as an eligibility starting point for additional emergency pensions.

    Last year, the United States declared a National Atomic Veterans’ Day and made potentially significant compensation available. But neither New Zealand nor Britain even apologised for putting those personnel in harm’s way so recklessly.

    During the war in Vietnam, some of the 3,400 New Zealanders who served between 1963 and 1975 were exposed to “Agent Orange”, the notorious defoliant used by the US military.

    Some of them and their children experienced related health problems and higher death rates. The government did not accept there was a problem until 2006 and apologised in 2008.

    Assistance and compensation was based on evidence of specific listed conditions. And although the list has expanded over time, the legal and medical burden of proving a link between exposure and an illness falls on the veteran.

    This is the opposite of what should happen. If there is uncertainty about the medical condition of a veteran, such as a non-listed condition, it should be for the Crown to prove an illness or injury is not related to military service. This burden should not fall on the victim.

    Lest we forget

    Today, support for veterans remains limited. There is still a reluctance to systematically understand, study and respond to the long-term consequences of military service.

    For many, service develops skills such as resilience, confidence and flexibility which are sought after in civilian life. For some, their experiences lead to lingering trauma and even self-harm or suicide.

    While Britain and Australia can track the incidence of veteran self-harm, New Zealand lacks robust data. Beyond some early research, the prevalence of suicide in the veteran population is unknown.

    Despite recommendations from the 2018 report that this data gap should be plugged, it means that when three self-inflicted deaths of veterans occurred within three weeks earlier this year, this couldn’t be viewed within any overall pattern. This makes appropriate support and interventions harder to design.

    This all points to the same problem. While we intone “lest we forget” on April 25, a day later most of us are looking the other way.

    Alexander Gillespie does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Lest we forget? Aside from Anzac Day, NZ has been slow to remember its military veterans – https://theconversation.com/lest-we-forget-aside-from-anzac-day-nz-has-been-slow-to-remember-its-military-veterans-254684

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI Russia: World Economic Outlook Press Briefing

    Source: IMF – News in Russian

    April 22, 2025

    Speakers:

    Pierre‑Olivier Gourinchas, Director, Research Department, IMF
    Petya Koeva Brooks, Deputy Director, Research Department, IMF
    Deniz Igan, Division Chief, Research Department, IMF

    Moderator:
    Jose Luis De Haro, Communications Officer, IMF   

    Mr. De Haro: OK. I think we can start and we have a quorum. So good morning, everyone, and welcome. I want to welcome also those joining us online. I am Jose Luis de Haro with the Communications Department at the IMF and we are gathered here today for the presentation of our latest edition of the World Economic Outlook titled, “A Critical Juncture Amid Policy Shifts.” I hope by this time you all have had access to the document. If not, I am going to encourage you, as always, to go to IMF.org. There, you are going to find the document, the World Economic Outlook, also Pierre‑Olivier’s blog and many other assets, including the underlying data for some of the charts that are published on the World Economic Outlook.

    I also want to plug in that we have a new database portal that I encourage you to use, and what’s best, that to discuss the new outlook that having here with us today, Pierre‑Olivier Gourinchas. He is the Economic Counsellor, the chief economist, and the Director of the Research Department. Next to him are Petya Koeva Brooks, she is the Deputy Director of the Research Department and last, but not least, we also have Deniz Igan, she is the division chief also with the Research Department.

    Pierre‑Olivier, as usual is going to start with some opening remarks, and then we are going to open the floor to your questions. I just want to remind everyone that this press briefing, it’s on the record and that we also have simultaneous translation.

    So let me stop here. Pierre‑Olivier, the floor is yours.

    Mr. Gourinchas: Thank you, Jose. And good morning, everyone. The landscape has changed since our last World Economic Outlook update in January. We are entering a new era as the global economic system that has operated for the last 80 years is being reset. Since late January, many tariff announcements have been made, culminating on April 2, with near universal levies from the United States and counterresponses from some trading partners. The U.S. effective tariff rate has surged past levels reached more than 100 years ago, while tariff rates on the U.S. have also increased.

    Beyond the abrupt increase in tariffs, the surge in policy uncertainty is a major driver of the economic outlook. If sustained, the increasing trade tensions and uncertainty will slow global growth significantly. Reflecting this complexity, our report presents a reference forecast which incorporates policy announcements up to April 4 by the U.S. and trading partners. Under these reference forecasts, global growth will reach 2.8 percent this year and 3 percent next year, a cumulative downgrade of about 0.8 percentage points relative to our January 2025 WEO update. Our report also offers a range of forecasts under different policy assumptions.

    Under an alternative path that excludes the April tariff announcements, global growth would have seen only a modest downgrade to 3.2 percent this year. We will also use a model‑based forecast to incorporate the temporary suspension of most tariffs announced on April 9, together with the increase in bilateral tariffs between China and the U.S. to prohibitive levels. This pause, even if extended permanently, delivers a similar growth outlook as a reference forecast, 2.8 percent, even if some highly tariffed countries could benefit.

    Now, while global growth remains well above recession levels, all regions are negatively impacted this year and next. And the global disinflation process continues, but at a slower pace with inflation revised up by 0.1 percentage point in both years. These trade tensions will greatly impact global trade. We project that global trade growth will be more than cut in half from 3.8 percent last year to 1.7 percent this year. The tariffs will play out differently in different countries. For the United States, the tariffs represent a supply shock that reduces productivity and output permanently and increases price pressures temporarily. This adds to an already weakening outlook and leads us to revise growth down by 0.9 percentage points to 1.8 percent, with a 0.4 percentage point downgrade from the tariffs only. While inflation is revised upwards.

    For trading partners, tariffs act mostly as a negative external demand shock. Weakening activity and prices, even if some countries could benefit from trade diversion. This is why we have lowered our China growth forecast this year to 4 percent, while inflation is revised down by 0.8 percentage points, increasing deflationary pressures. All countries are negatively affected by the surge in trade policy uncertainty, as businesses cut purchases and investment, while financial institutions reassess their borrowers’ exposure. Uncertainty also increases because of the complex sectoral disruptions that tariffs could cause up and down supply chains, as we saw during the pandemic.

    The effect of these shocks on exchange rates is complex. The tariffs could appreciate the US dollar, as in previous episodes. However, greater policy uncertainty, lower U.S. growth prospects, and an adjustment in the global demand for dollar assets are weighing down on the dollar.

    Risks to the global economic have increased and are firmly to the downside.

    First, while we are not projecting a global downturn, the risks it may happen this year have increased substantially, from 17 percent projected back in October to 30 percent now. An escalation of trade tensions would further depress growth. Financial conditions could also tighten, as markets react negatively to diminished growth prospects and increased uncertainty. On the flip side, growth prospects could immediately improve if countries ease from their current trade policy stance and promote a new, clear, and stable trade environment.

    Addressing domestic imbalances can also help raise growth while contributing significantly to closing external imbalances. For Europe, this means spending more on public infrastructure to accelerate productivity growth. For China, it means boosting support for domestic demand. While for the U.S., it means stepping up fiscal consolidation.

    Turning to policies. Our recommendations call for prudence and improved collaboration. Let me outline some key ones. First, an obvious priority is to restore trade policy stability. The global economy needs a clear, stable, and predictable trading environment, one that addresses some of the longstanding gaps in international trading rules. Monetary policy will need to remain agile and respond by tightening where inflation pressures re‑emerge, while easing where weak demand dominates. Monetary policy credibility will be key, especially where inflation expectations might de‑anchor. And central bank independence remains a cornerstone.

    Many fiscal authorities will face new spending needs to bolster defense spending or to offset the trade dislocations, likely to come. Some of the poorest countries also hit with reduced official aid could experience debt distress. Yet debt levels are still elevated and most countries still need to rebuild fiscal space, including by implementing structural reforms. Support, where needed, should remain narrowly targeted and temporary. It is easier to turn on the fiscal tap than to turn it off. Where new spending needs are permanent, as for defense spending in some countries, planning for offsetting cuts elsewhere or new revenues should be made.

    Finally, even if some of the grievances against our trading system have merit, we should all work toward fixing the system so that it can deliver better opportunities to all. Thank you.

    Mr. De Haro: Thank you, Pierre‑Olivier. Before we open the floor to your questions, some ground rules. First of all, if you want to ask a question, raise your hand. If I call on you, please identify yourself and the media outlet you represent. Try to be succinct. Stick to one question. We want to answer as many questions as possible.

    And also, a reminder. We are here to discuss the World Economic Outlook. Those questions regarding country programs, institutional issues are going to be better placed for the regional press briefings that are happening later this week and also the Managing Director’s press briefing this Thursday.

    With that said, I want hands up. OK. So I am going to start here in the center. Then I am going to move the room to my left. Then to my right. I am going to start with the lady with the green jacket there.

    QUESTION: Thank you.. Thanks so much for doing this.

    Pierre‑Olivier, I wonder if you can speak a little bit to the fact that you haven’t called out a recession. And you know, we are hearing lots of economists in the United States and other places‑‑most recently yesterday, the IIF is now also forecasting a small recession in the second half of the year. What we see in the WEO is that the percentage of risk of a recession has increased pretty dramatically. Can you walk us through why you are not at this point calling a recession, for instance, likely in the United States and what it would take to tip it that way? Thanks.

    Mr. Gourinchas: Thank you, Andrea.

    So for the United States, we are projecting a significant slowdown. We are projecting growth will be at 1.8 percent in 2025. And that’s a 0.9 percentage‑point slowdown‑‑revision in our projections from January. But 1.9 percent is obviously not a recession. And the reason for this is is that we have a U.S. economy that, in our view, is coming from a position of strength. We had an economy that was growing very rapidly. We have a labor market that is still very robust. We have seen some signs of weakening and slowdown in the U.S. economy, even before the tariff announcements. So, in fact, the 0.9 percentage point downward revision that I just mentioned, only a part of this‑‑maybe 0.4 percentage points‑‑is coming from the tariffs. Some of that is also coming from weakening momentum. This was an economy that was doing very, very well but was self‑correcting and cooling off a bit on its own. And we were seeing already consumption numbers coming down. We are seeing consumer confidence coming down. So all of that was already factored in. But we are not seeing a recession in our reference forecast.

    As you mentioned, Andrea, we are‑‑when we do our risk assessment, if you want, we are seeing the probability of a recession increasing, from about 25 percent back in October to around 40 percent when we assess it now.

    Mr. De Haro: OK. I am going to move to this side. The lady here in red.

    QUESTION: Good morning.

    Pierre, I wanted to ask you about the downward pressure on the dollar now. To what extent you believe it can provide some relief from the pressure on highly indebted emerging economies with a large share of dollar‑denominated debt? And has this downward pressure on the dollar changed your outlook on all of those emerging economies that are still, you know, under the impact of the high debt‑‑as mentioned by the MD in previous meetings, where this high debt is really one of the impediments to growth? Thanks.

    Mr. Gourinchas: Yes. So we are seeing a weakening of the dollar that is fairly broad‑based over the last few weeks, as I mentioned in my opening remarks, some of that is coming from the weaker growth prospects in the U.S. Some it is coming from the increased uncertainty. And it’s leading to a reassessment of the global demand for dollar assets. When we step back, we also have to realize we are coming from a position where, over the last few years, there have been tremendous capital inflows into U.S. markets, in particular, risk markets. That’s something that, of course, my colleague Tobias Adrian will talk about in the GFSR press conference. So we are seeing some adjustment, some contradiction. The markets are handling it. We don’t see signs of stress, even in currency markets.

    Now, the interesting development is, what does it mean for emerging markets? And you are right to point out that, in the past, when the dollar would strengthen, that would not necessarily be good news for emerging markets because they have dollar‑denominated debts, so that increases their liabilities and the pressure on them to service their debts. And this can lead to some tightening of financial conditions. So we are not seeing that right now. And so that’s a plus. The flip side of this is, of course, the appreciation of some of these emerging markets’ currencies means that they are also losing a little bit on the competitiveness side, so there is maybe something that is a bit easier on the finance conditions, something that is not as easy on the trade side.

    Finally, this is an environment of enormous uncertainty, increased volatility. And that I think is something that will dominate for many of the emerging markets. So when we are looking at our assessment, we are actually downgrading the emerging market economies for 2025 and 2026, most of them. Some of them may, as I mentioned, benefit. But overall, as a group, they are downgraded. While because they are also very plugged into the global supply chains, the uncertainty is leading to a pause in investment and activity, and they are going to suffer from the decline in demand for their products coming from the tariffs.

    Mr. De Haro: OK. I am going to go with the gentleman here with the glasses.

    QUESTION: Thank you. I just have one question. Could you elaborate a little bit on what will happen with the trade flows in your models? I saw that in the basic assumption, the exports from the U.S. are [breaking quite heavily but not that much from China. Why is this so?

    And do I understand it right that this basic model does not yet integrate the additional hikes after ‑‑ happening after basically April 9, so above 100 percent on import tariffs by the U.S.? Thanks.

    Mr. Gourinchas: So we are seeing a large impact on global trade coming from the tariffs and that’s going to be the case under any combination of tariffs where the effective tariff rates remains very elevated. And the reason why when we looked at the different scenarios that I mentioned, whether it’s a reference scenario or our April 9 scenario which includes lower tariffs on many countries but sharply increased tariffs between the U.S. and China. The overall impact on the global economy is not very different because the effective tariff rate is, if anything, even higher under that pause. So global trade is going to be significantly affected. The particular configuration of trade, which bilateral trade flows are going to be affected versus others that will depend on the final landscape in terms of tariffs so we can anticipate that there will be much lower bilateral trade under either the reference scenario or the April 9, between the U.S. and China. And that is weighing down on global trade growth. This is weighing down on global trade generally.

    Mr. De Haro: OK. I am going to turn here to the center. I am going to go to the first row. I am going to go with the lady with the yellow bottle.

    QUESTION: Thank you,

    You have downgraded the U.K.’s growth forecast quite sharply and given the range of explanations, from higher tariff barriers to more domestic issues, like cost‑of‑living pressures. Out of those, so the global challenges versus domestic challenges, which one is weighing more heavily on the U.K.’s growth forecasts?

    Mr. De Haro: OK we are going to open the round of U.K. questions so if you have questions on the U.K., raise your hand. And I will pass the mic to you. I see  two there. Yep.

    QUESTION: Hi.

    In a world where everyone is warning about the impact of tariffs on U.S. inflation and how much it will raise U.S. prices, why do you have the U.K. with the highest inflation rate in the G‑7 this year? And do you believe tariffs will be inflationary or disinflationary for the U.K.?

    Mr. De Haro: OK. Joe here in the first row.

    QUESTION: Yeah. Thank you. Thank you very much. So Joel hills from ITV news. Obviously it’s impacting the tariffs are impacting the U.K. They are impacting most countries. I just wonder this, President Trump did say there would be some disruption. He suggested it would be sort of temporary. Is it possible that President Trump is actually a genius? That he knows something you do not?

    Mr. De Haro: And I think we have a last question on the U.K. and this is going to be the last question on the U.K. There on the back of the room.

    QUESTION: Yeah.

    The U.K. inflation forecast is, you know, much higher than we expected it to be, 0.7 percent higher. Is that going to impact on lowering interest rates in the U.K.? And does that affect the growth rate, which seems to be rather optimistic, compared with some of the other European countries?

    Mr. De Haro: OK. We are going to be done with the U.K. questions and then we will move along. So Pierre‑Olivier.

    Mr. Gourinchas: Thank you. So many questions. Let me address them as best I can. First, on the revision for growth in the U.K. and inflation. So the tariffs are playing a role, as they are in most countries and uncertainty is also playing a role, as it is in all countries. And it’s weighing down on growth in the U.K. But there are some U.K.‑specific factors and I would say that in terms of the zero point 5 percentage point downward revision that we are saying for the U.K., the domestic factors are probably the biggest ones. And in particular, there is a lower carryover from weaker growth in the second half of last year. There is also some tightening of financial conditions, as interest rates have risen, longer‑term interest rates.

    On inflation, the revision in inflation in the U.K. is coming, again, from domestic factors, and in particular some change in regulated energy prices. So that’s expected to be temporary but it’s also very U.K.‑specific. The effect of the tariffs on countries like the U.K., like it is on the EU or China is like a negative demand shock. It’s weakening activity but it’s also lowering price pressures, not increasing them.

    Now, what is the impact of the tariffs in the medium and long term? Not just what’s going to happen this year and next but what’s going to happen longer term? Our assessment is it’s going to be negative. We have a box in our report that looks at the long‑term impact of the tariffs, if they are maintained. And it is negative for all regions, just like the short‑term impact. So we are seeing a negative impact in the short term, in the medium term, in the long term. Again, there are nuances. Some countries might benefit, depending on the particular configuration of tariffs. It might benefit from some trade diversion; but the broad picture is it’s negative for the outlook.

    Now, our ‑‑ and I will end with that. Our forecast for 2025 is slightly higher than OBR’s forecast. Some of this has to do with some of the underlying monetary policy assumptions for the U.K. The bank‑‑

    Our assumption for this year is that there are going to be four cuts through the year. One cut already happened. We expect three more.

    Mr. De Haro: Thank you, Pierre‑Olivier. I am not going to forget about the people that are on WebEx, and I am going to pass a question there. I see Anton from TAS.

    QUESTION: Good morning. Thank you for doing this.

    Given the projected slowdown of Russia’s GDP growth from 4.1 in 2024 to 1.5 in 2025, what are the primary factors driving this sharp decline? And how sustainable is Russia’s growth model going forward? Thank you.

    Mr. De Haro: Go ahead.

    Mr. Gourinchas: Petya, would you like to answer?

    Ms. Koeva Brooks: Sure. We are indeed expecting a slowdown in growth to 1.5 this year, and this, to a large extent is kind of the natural slowing of the economy after growing quite robustly in previous years. And also as a result of policy tightening that we have seen, both on the fiscal as well as on the monetary policy side. It is also due to the lower oil prices that have come about as a result of the‑‑as a response to the round of tariffs, as well as the uncertainty about global growth. So all these factors are behind that lower growth number, although I should point out that it is actually a slight upward revision, relative to what we had back in January. And the reason for that is that, again, we actually had seen upward surprises in 2024, which kind of carried into 2025.

    When it comes to the medium‑term growth outlook, we do expect that to be relatively weak. We are‑‑we have penciled in growth number of about 1.2, which is down from 1.7 which is what we had before the start of the war.

    Mr. De Haro: OK. Let’s continue. I am going to go again in the center and then I am going to go to that side. The lady with the glasses there.

    QUESTION: Hi.

    In Latin America, we received almost every country 10 percent. So I want to know about the impact of the tariffs in Latin America and if the impact is going to be limited, versus other regions, and when we are going to start to feeling this impact. Thank you.

    Mr. De Haro: And before we answer the question, are there any questions on Mexico, Brazil, Argentina? OK. Argentina friends, go ahead.

    QUESTION: Hello.

    You’ve kept 5.5 growth projection that was decided in the latest program that Argentina signed with the IMF. I would like to know why you are not seeing so much impact yet about‑‑of this general context.

    Mr. De Haro: OK. We can go ahead first with the Latin America overview and then we can go to Argentina.

    Mr. Gourinchas: I will just say something briefly and then ask my colleague Petya to come in. So for Latin America, as a whole, we are saying activity that is largely driven by consumption on the back of resilient labor markets while investment remains somewhat sluggish. And the slowdown in our projection reflects the impact of tariffs and the global growth slowdown, of course, which is also affecting countries in the region. Policy uncertainty. And the withdrawal of fiscal stimulus and in some countries monetary policy tightening.

    Ms. Koeva Brooks: I don’t have a lot to add. Just to say that the disinflation process has also slowed a bit, and this is also‑‑also makes the policy trade‑offs a bit more complicated with slow‑‑with growth slowing down and at the same time, you know, having still challenges on the inflation side.

    Mr. De Haro: OK. So we are going to move on. I am going to ask the gentleman in the first row there because‑‑

    Oh, sorry. Sorry. I forgot about Argentina. Please go ahead.

    Ms. Koeva Brooks: We cannot forget about Argentina.

    So the growth forecast for this year‑‑you are right‑‑we still have the upgrade of .5. And this is related to just the positive surprises that we had seen, in spite of a very strong fiscal adjustment, the recovery in confidence I think has definitely played a role in kind of driving us to have this forecast. That said, there are a number of risks related to tighter financial conditions, commodity prices, and a lot of others, which is true for many if not most other countries.

    Mr. De Haro: OK. So now we can move on. I am going to go with the gentleman in the first row.

    QUESTION: Thank you. In the October 2024 outlook you saw a stable but slow growth for Africa. What’s new now? And what kind of initiatives like the African Continental Free Trade Area do for African economies amidst these trade tensions?

    Mr. De Haro: And before we answer, I think‑‑

    QUESTION: Hi. Good morning.

    One of the things that you mentioned in your report is the demographic shift and the rise in the silver economy. Africa, on the other hand, has the reverse of that. So what is your recommendation in the short and medium term on how to deal with some of these challenges pertaining to tariffs, monetary policy, and now currency exchange? Thank you.

    Mr. De Haro: OK.

    Mr. Gourinchas: OK. Thank you. I will just say one word about the outlook in sub‑Saharan Africa and then I will ask my colleague Deniz to come in to add more color and answer also the question on the demographic trends.

    So regional growth in sub‑Saharan Africa improved significantly last year, to 4 percent. And it will ease in 2025. And this is in line with a softer global outlook. So we are seeing the same forces at play in the region, as we are seeing more globally. And a downturn‑‑and a downward revision in our projection that is of a similar magnitude at about 0.4 percentage point. Deniz?

    Ms. Igan: Thank you for the question. So on the demographic shifts, our Chapter 2 basically points out that countries’ age structures are evolving at different rates, as you pointed out as well. We have most western economies, some Asian economies that are aging fast. And you know in a health way some of them. And then we have many sub‑Saharan African countries that have a very young population. And what the chapter shows is actually, there are important medium‑term consequences of that, both for growth, as well as external balances of countries.

    In Africa’s case, basically, what we would see is a demographic dividend coming from having a young population. And the question then becomes how best to leverage that, how best to use that and channel it into growth. And the answer there, first and foremost, depends on the structural reforms, the investment that’s necessary on healthcare, on education, on human capital more generally and also international cooperation because our Chapter 3 looks more carefully into migration flows. And again, there, we see migration policy shifts in destination countries has spillovers for other countries. And this is especially true for emerging market economies and lower income economies. So, again, international cooperation there, making sure that growth dividends are utilized in the best way is what we delve into in the chapter.

    Mr. De Haro: OK. I am going to go to the gentleman with‑‑raise your hand. Yeah. You. No, I am going back. Then I will go‑‑there you go.

    QUESTION: OK. I have a question about China’s growth.

    In your World Economic Outlook, you say China’s growth forecast has been cut to 4 percent for this year, which is a 0.6 percentage drop from an earlier projection. But China’s National Bureau of Statistics a couple of days ago predicted China’s growth GDP growth in the first quarter was 5.4 percent. So my question is, how do you see the disparity in the forecast? Is China more optimistic than you are? Thank you.

    Mr. Gourinchas: Thank you. So, yes, we are revising our growth projections for China down by 0.6 percentage points, as you have noted. I should flag that this number does not incorporate the latest release for Q1. That came after we closed our round of projections. So this is not reflected there. And we will have to see how it affects our projections when we have our next round of WEO updates.

    But let me give you a little bit of perspective on the rationale behind our revision for China. The tariff increase in tariffs especially since China is one of the countries that is facing the most elevated tariffs right now, is going to have a very significant impact in our projections on the Chinese economy. In fact, when we do a decomposition, which I showed during my opening remarks, the impact of the tariffs on the Chinese economy would be a negative 1.3 percentage point revision on growth.

    So why do we only have 0.6? Well, because there are other factors that are helping to support Chinese growth in 2025 and 2026. One of which‑‑which is quite important‑‑is the fiscal support that has been announced since the beginning of the year. And that is adding up, something of the amount of 0.5 percentage points. So the impact of the current trade tensions is very significant. It’s partly offset. We expect it to remain quite significant also in 2026 when we also have a downward revision by about 0.5 percentage points.

    The other side of this, where we are seeing the impact of the tariffs is on inflation, which is revised down. Our headline inflation projection for 2025 is actually at zero. So it’s down from 0.8 percent to zero. So China is facing stronger deflationary forces as a result of these trade tensions.

    Mr. De Haro: OK. I am going to move to this side. The gentleman with the glasses here.

    QUESTION: What impact did the oil price also have in exporting and importing countries in the Middle East? Thank you.

    Mr. De Haro: Go ahead.

    Mr. Gourinchas: So we have seen oil prices declining since our last projections, and the decline in oil prices in our and our interpretation is coming mostly from weaker global demand, so it’s the weakening of global activity that is driving the decline in prices. There has been some increase in supply coming from OPEC Plus countries, but broadly speaking, the decline is mostly coming from weaker demand.

    So that is going to play out in ways you sort of would expect. The commodity exporters are going to face lower export revenues from the decline in oil prices. That’s going to weigh on their fiscal outlook, on their growth.

    For those countries that are oil importers, it’s going to lower inflation pressures because that‑‑lower oil prices is going to feed into lower headline inflation. It’s going to also provide some modest support to economic activity there.

    Deniz, anything to add on oil prices or‑‑or Petya?

    Ms. Koeva Brooks: No, I don’t.

    Mr. De Haro: OK. We are going to move to the center. I am going to get the gentleman with the white shirt there.

    QUESTION: h I am not going to ask another question about the U.K., you will be pleased to know. Over the last week we have seen a number of attacks by the White House on the independence of the Federal Reserve. How destabilizing do you think this might be for financial markets?

    Mr. Gourinchas: So central banks are facing a delicate moment. As I have explained in many countries, the impact of the tariffs is going to be to increase recessionary forces and it is going to lower price pressures. And that will help central banks cut interest rates faster and provide some support to their economies. But in other countries ‑‑ and in our projections, the U.S. is in that category‑‑the tariffs are going to increase price pressures. Price pressures in the U.S. are increasing for other reasons as well. Service prices have been quite‑‑inflation of service prices have been quite strong. And that is something that we are seeing already. But the tariffs are likely to increase price pressures. We are projecting inflation to remain at 3 percent in the U.S. this year, the same level as last year, headline inflation.

    So in that context, if you also think about where we are coming from, we are coming from a period of very elevated inflation. We are just coming off the cost‑of‑living crisis, a surge in inflation rates to double digits that we haven’t seen in more than a generation. So the critical thing is to make sure that inflation expectations remain anchored, that everyone remains convinced that central banks will do what is necessary to bring inflation back to central bank targets in an orderly manner. And central banks have instruments to do this. They have their interest rate instruments. They have various instruments of monetary policy. But one critical aspect of what they do is coming from their credibility. So central banks need to remain credible. And part of that credibility is built upon their central bank independence. And so from that perspective, it’s very important to preserve that.

    Mr. De Haro: OK. We are going to have time for two questions. One of them is going back to WebEx. I see Weier, please. Come in.

    QUESTION: Yes.I have a question.

    You mentioned that the global economic system is being reset. And I am not sure if one of the early signs in the financial markets, as we see that the markets moving from American exceptionalism to the sort of sell the U.S. narrative. So could you assess the implications for the financial markets and the world economy, as a whole?

    Mr. Gourinchas: Yeah, well we have seen some volatility in the markets, of course, whenever there is going to be potentially a significant change in the economic structure of the global economy. I think we are bound to see some reassessment. And investors are going to try to figure out what’s happening, and that’s going to inject volatility. And we are seeing some of that.

    The good news is a lot of that volatility we have seen in the last few weeks has not led to significant market dislocations or market stress to levels that would, for instance, have necessitated the interventions by central banks around the world.

    So whether you are looking at equity markets, whether you are looking at bond markets, whether you are looking at currency markets, what we are saying is a reassessment of the world we are in now and that means that there is a reassessment of valuations of risk assets, of different currencies. But that is happening in an orderly manner. So from that perspective, we are seeing a system that is quite resilient, that remained resilient but, of course, we are watching carefully and there has been some tightening of financial conditions and that’s something to be looking out for. We want to make sure that it doesn’t get to a level where the stress in the financial system would become too extreme.

    Mr. De Haro: OK. The lady here in the first row has been waiting patiently. Please go ahead.

    QUESTION: Thank you, Jose. I want to ask about the trading tensions impact on low‑income countries. You mentioned there are like downgrading for emerging markets but how about like those small countries who have lower income as a group, have you assessed the particular impact on them in these ongoing trade tensions? Thank you.

    Mr. Gourinchas: OK. Well thanks. For low‑income countries as a group, we are also seeing a downgrade in which we report in our report of 0.4 percentage points. We are expecting growth of 4.2 percent in 2025. So the 0.4 is very similar to what we are seeing at the aggregate levels, 0.5. So from that perspective it looks quite the same. However, there are also a lot of differences across countries, and when we look more carefully, you might see some vulnerable countries, especially in sub‑Saharan Africa. But elsewhere as well‑‑who could face very challenging conditions as a result of the tariffs in an environment in which many of the countries, low‑income countries have been facing a funding squeeze for a number of years now, private capital flows to this region have been drying up or have been coming on very expensive terms. We are seeing a drying up also of some official aid flows. So some of these countries have very limited fiscal space. Near a situation where the situation could become more challenging.

    Now, on the flip side, the fact that we are seeing commodity prices coming down for many commodities will help some of them. The commodity importers in that group will hurt the ones who are commodity exporters. And there are a number of countries among the low-income group that are commodity exporters, so that is adding some additional pressure on them.

    Mr. De Haro: I am going to make an exception and just one last question. I am going to go with the gentleman in the white shirt there. He has been waiting patiently, too. And don’t get frustrated. There are going to be many opportunities for you to ask questions.

    QUESTION: Thank you, Jose. AFP.

    I had a quick question about Spain because that’s the only countries among advanced economies where you had an upward revision. It’s going to be way better than the eurozone and even better than other advanced economies. What are the underlying reasons for that? And you formally talked much about tourism but are there any other things that might be pointed out? Thank you.

    Mr. Gourinchas: Yes, indeed. Spain is doing better than its peers. Petya, would you like to talk about it?

    Ms. Koeva Brooks: Sure. Indeed. We are actually having an upgrade for Spain this year, which is a rare occurrence in the many, many downgrades that we have had for many other countries. This is partly because the Spanish economy just had such strong momentum in 2024, coming into 2025. And part of that was due to the very strong services exports as well as the very strong labor accumulation. Part of that related to immigration. But all of that being said, Spain is still being affected indirectly and directly by the tariffs and the uncertainty associated with that. It’s just that, as I said, that underlying [strength is kind of having a bigger impact in the near term. But then again, in 2026, we do project kind of a slowing of growth to about 1.8.

    Mr. De Haro: OK. And on that point, I want to thank you, everyone, on behalf of Pierre‑Olivier, Petya, Deniz, the Research Department, the Communications Department. Some reminders. Next press briefing is going to happen in this same room, Global Financial Stability Report, please stay tuned. Tomorrow you have the Fiscal Monitor, and then later in the week, you have the Managing Director’s press briefing and also all the regional press briefings that we have been talking about. Thank you very much for your time. If you have questions, comments, send them my way to media@imf.org and hopefully you have a great week. I am sure it’s going to be busy.

    IMF Communications Department
    MEDIA RELATIONS

    PRESS OFFICER: Jose De Haro

    Phone: +1 202 623-7100Email: MEDIA@IMF.org

    https://www.imf.org/en/News/Articles/2025/04/22/tr-04222025-weo-press-briefing

    MIL OSI

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI USA: ON EARTH DAY, CASTEN, SCHATZ INTRODUCE LEGISLATION TO ADDRESS THE COSTS AND FINANCIAL RISKS OF CLIMATE CHANGE

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Sean Casten (IL-06)

    April 22, 2025

    Washington, D.C. – U.S. Representative Sean Casten (D-IL-06) and U.S. Senator Brian Schatz (D-Hawai‘i) introduced the Climate Change Financial Risk Act, legislation that directs the Federal Reserve to conduct stress tests on large financial institutions to measure their resilience to climate-related financial risks.

    “Risk is risk—we should not be treating some risks different from others just because they’re hard to quantify. Federal regulators are legally obligated to ensure a stable and efficient financial system, and that means reducing the risk of a climate-driven financial crisis,” said Senator Schatz. “Instead of taking steps to reduce the risks facing communities across the country from increasingly frequent and severe extreme weather and disasters—including significantly higher costs for homeowners insurance—the Trump administration is trying to roll back our progress in the climate fight and gut the programs that will make us safer.”

    “Climate change poses a grave and imminent threat to the stability of our financial system. It is essential that our regulators establish parameters so that our financial institutions adequately prepare for and respond to these risks, and that they do so before the next extreme weather crisis strikes,” said Representative Casten. “Our bill will move us toward safeguarding our financial systems—from short-term climate impacts, such as direct uninsured losses from wildfires, hurricanes, and flooding events, as well as from long-term global shifts to a net-zero economy, which may require a reshaping of a bank’s lending and investment activities.”

    Climate change is increasing the frequency and severity of extreme weather events like floods and wildfires. It is also changing long-term climate patterns in ways that will ultimately affect every sector of our economy. Financial institutions face the risk of direct losses from severe weather events and fundamental changes like drought and sea level rise—for example, lower property values from increased flooding. They also face risks from market instability, an erosion of investor confidence, and changes in carbon-intensive asset values resulting from government policies and consumer preferences. 

    These risks to our financial system are critical for financial institutions to measure and manage, as recognized in the pilot climate scenario analysis exercise that the Federal Reserve conducted in 2023 and the Principles for Climate-Related Financial Risk Management for Large Financial Institutions published by agencies in 2023. The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency announced in March 2025 that it was withdrawing from its participation in these principles. The Climate Change Financial Risk Act will make sure that financial institutions manage climate risks with stress tests that quantify and measure their resilience.

    The Climate Change Financial Risk Act would require the Federal Reserve to create climate change scenarios for financial stress tests, with input from federal scientific agencies and an advisory group of climate scientists and climate economists. The Federal Reserve would then conduct stress tests every two years on the largest financial institutions. The biennial tests will require each covered institution to create and update a resolution plan, which will describe how the institution plans to evolve its capital planning, balance sheet and off-balance sheet exposures, and other business operations to respond to the most recent test results. Federal Reserve objections to a resolution plan would limit the institution’s ability to proceed with capital distributions until it improves its plan. The Federal Reserve will also partner with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation to design a survey to assess the ability of a broader set of financial institutions to withstand climate risks. 

    Casten and Schatz’s legislation is cosponsored by U.S. Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), Patty Murray (D-Wash.), Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), and Cory Booker (D-N.J), and U.S. Representatives Stephen Lynch (D-Mass.), Emanuel Cleaver (D-Mo.), Jared Huffman (D-Calif.), Kevin Mullin (D-Calif.), Sarah Elfreth (D-Md.), and Salud Carbajal (D-Calif.).

    “Those of us in the West are already experiencing the cost of climate inaction firsthand – from higher home insurance rates and utility bills for hardworking families to lower profits for producers. As the impacts of climate change intensify, we need to do everything we can to make our local economies more resilient for families, workers, and small businesses,” said Senator Heinrich. “This Earth Day, I’m proud to introduce the Climate Change Financial Risk Act with Senator Schatz to protect New Mexicans from the costly consequences of worsening climate change by strengthening the ability of our financial institutions to withstand extreme weather events like prolonged droughts and wildfires, which can trigger market instability and shake investor confidence.”

    “Trump’s Dirty Energy First strategy is fanning the flames of climate chaos, and it’s essential to understand the risk that poses to our major financial institutions,” said Senator Merkley. “We must not ignore the danger climate change poses to the economic security of hardworking Americans.”

    The Climate Change Financial Risk Act is supported by the League of Conservation Voters, Ceres, the Sierra Club, Public Citizen, and Americans for Financial Reform.

    “US regulators must get back in the business of managing the systemic financial risks posed by increasing floods, fires, and storms,” said Steven M. Rothstein, Managing Director of the Accelerator for Sustainable Capital Markets, Ceres. “We commend Senator Schatz and Representative Casten for reintroducing this legislation and laying out a clear role for the Federal Reserve Board to address climate-related financial risks. This legislation will provide the clarity and analysis needed to ensure the financial industry makes informed decisions that protect individual institutions from climate-related shocks and insulate the financial system from widespread loss.”

    “As financial regulators retreat under political pressure, this bill represents a much-needed step to ensure our financial system is better prepared for the growing risks of climate change. Investors need regulators to provide clear, forward-looking assessments of systemic risk — and to ensure that financial institutions aren’t throwing more fuel on the fire of the climate crisis. With climate disasters escalating and financial consequences mounting, leaders at all levels of government must act to build a more stable and sustainable financial system. We applaud Sen. Schatz and Rep. Casten for their continued leadership to make that happen,” said Ben Cushing, Sustainable Finance Campaign Director, the Sierra Club.

    The full text of the bill is available here.

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Animal That Once Lived With Dinosaurs Helps Keep NASA Kennedy In Balance

    Source: NASA

    They’re known as “living fossils”.
    For over 450 million years, horseshoe crabs have been an ecologically vital part of our planet. They’re one of the few surviving species on Earth dating back to the dinosaurs.
    At NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida, the American horseshoe crab (Limulus polyphemus) is one of more than 1,500 types of animals and plants you can find living on its over 144,000 acres, the majority of which is managed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Park Service. Sharing a boundary with the Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge and Canaveral National Seashore, NASA Kennedy is one of the most biologically diverse places in the United States.
    The center’s land, water, and air species live alongside the symbols of America’s space program: the vital facilities and infrastructure that support the many launches at NASA Kennedy and Cape Canaveral Space Force Station as well as the rockets enabling humanity’s exploration of the cosmos.

    Preserving NASA Kennedy’s wildlife while also fulfilling the agency’s mission requires a balanced approach. The American horseshoe crab exemplifies that balance.
    Horseshoe crabs are keystone species in coastal and estuary systems like the ones surrounding Earth’s premier spaceport. By themselves, these resilient arthropods are a strong indicator of how an ecosystem is doing to support the migratory birds, sea turtles, alligators and other wildlife who rely on it for their survival.
    “The presence and abundance of horseshoe crabs influence the structure and functioning of the entire ecosystem,” said James T. Brooks, an environmental protection specialist at NASA Kennedy. “Their eggs provide a vital food source for many shorebirds in coastal habitats, and their feeding activities help shape the composition of plants and animals that live at the bottom of the ocean or in rivers and lakes. Changes in horseshoe crab populations can signal broader ecological issues, such as pollution or habitat loss.”
    As featured recently on NASA+, biologists survey NASA Kennedy’s beaches regularly for horseshoe crabs, counting each one they spot and tagging them with devices that lets researchers study their migration patterns and survival rates. The devices also track the crabs’ spawning activity, habitat health, and population trends, especially during peak breeding seasons in spring and summer.

    [embedded content]

    All this data helps in assessing the overall health of NASA Kennedy’s ecosystem, but horseshoe crabs also play a vital role in humanity’s health. Their blue, copper-based blood contains a substance called Limulus Amebocyte Lysate, critical for detecting bacterial contamination in medical equipment, pharmaceuticals, and vaccines.
    Their unique value in ensuring biomedical safety underscores why NASA Kennedy emphasizes ecological monitoring in addition to its roles in the global space economy, national defense, and space exploration.

    At NASA Kennedy, horseshoe crabs are protected and monitored through habitat restoration projects like rebuilding shorelines eroded by storms and minimizing human impact on nesting sites. These initiatives ensure that the spaceport’s operations coexist harmoniously with nature and deepen our understanding of Earth’s interconnected ecosystems.
    On this Earth Day, NASA Kennedy celebrates the important role these ancient mariners play as we launch humanity’s future.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Economics: JP Morgan and UBS top M&A financial advisers in retail sector during Q1 2025, reveals GlobalData

    Source: GlobalData

    JP Morgan and UBS top M&A financial advisers in retail sector during Q1 2025, reveals GlobalData

    Posted in Business Fundamentals

    JP Morgan and UBS were the top mergers and acquisitions (M&A) financial advisers in the retail sector during the first quarter (Q1) of 2025 by value and volume, respectively, according to the latest financial advisers league table by GlobalData, a leading data and analytics company.

    An analysis of GlobalData’s Deals Database reveals that JP Morgan achieved the leading position in terms of value by advising on $28.7 billion worth of deals. Meanwhile, UBS led in terms of volume by advising on five deals.

    Aurojyoti Bose, Lead Analyst at GlobalData, comments: “Both JP Morgan and UBS registered year-on-year (YoY) improvement in terms of deal volume and value as well as their respective ranking during Q1 2025. While JP Morgan’s ranking in terms of value improved from the second position in Q1 2024 to the top position in 2025, UBS went ahead from 11th to the top position by volume during the same period.

    “Apart from leading by value in Q1 2025, JP Morgan also occupied the second position by volume. Similarly, UBS, apart from leading by volume, also occupied the third position by value.”

    Wells Fargo occupied the second position in terms of value, by advising on $26.3 billion worth of deals, followed by UBS with $25.4 billion, Morgan Stanley with $24.7 billion and Citi with $23.7 billion.

    Meanwhile, JP Morgan occupied the second position in terms of volume with four deals, followed by Morgan Stanley with three deals, Bank of America with three deals and Wells Fargo with two deals.

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI Economics: Bank of America top M&A financial adviser in construction sector during Q1 2025, reveals GlobalData

    Source: GlobalData

    Bank of America top M&A financial adviser in construction sector during Q1 2025, reveals GlobalData

    Posted in Business Fundamentals

    Bank of America was the top mergers and acquisitions (M&A) financial adviser in the construction sector during the first quarter (Q1) of 2025 by value as well as volume, according to the latest financial advisers league table by GlobalData, a leading data and analytics company.

    An analysis of GlobalData’s Deals Database reveals that Bank of America achieved the leading position by advising on four deals worth $12.1 billion.

    Aurojyoti Bose, Lead Analyst at GlobalData, comments: “There was an year-on-year (YoY) improvement in the total volume and value of deals advised by Bank of America during Q1 2025. Resultantly, it went ahead from occupying the 31st position by volume in Q1 2024 to top the chart by this metric in Q1 2025. Bank of America’s ranking by value also jumped from 14th to the top position during this period.”

    Goldman Sachs occupied the second position in terms of value, by advising on $12 billion worth of deals, followed by Lazard with $11.5 billion, JP Morgan with $11.5 billion and Jefferies with $8.8 billion.

    Meanwhile, Generational Group occupied the second position in terms of volume with four deals, followed by Goldman Sachs with three deals, Lazard with three deals and Morgan Stanley with three deals.

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI Economics: France gives EUR 1.9 million to build capacity in developing economies, LDCs

    Source: World Trade Organization

    Through the agreement signed by France and the WTO in July 2024, France provides, over a period of three years,  funding of EUR 6 million to the French-Irish Mission Programme, the WTO Chairs Programme and the Standards and Trade Development Facility. These programmes are aimed at helping government officials from developing economies and LDCs better implement global trade rules and standards and at helping academic institutions provide support for trade policy-making.

     “Our support for technical assistance in the WTO is a concrete expression of our commitment to an inclusive multilateral system,” France’s WTO Ambassador Emmanuelle Ivanov-Durand said. “Technical assistance is an important part of the WTO – it increases the number of people who are able to participate in the multilateral trading system and ultimately reap its benefits. France is proud to support the French-Irish Mission Programme, the WTO Chairs Programme and the Standards and Trade Development Facility, especially in these difficult times when resources are increasingly difficult to mobilize and when the multilateral system is under strain.”

    The French-Irish Mission Programme, sponsored by France and Ireland, will receive EUR 900,000 (CHF 870,000) to finance the placement of government officials at the permanent missions of developing economies, LDCs and observers in Geneva.

    A total of EUR 550,000 (CHF 530,000) will support the WTO Chairs Programme aimed at helping academic institutions in developing and least developed members and observers build and sustain their expertise in international trade through projects focusing on research, curriculum development and outreach.

    The Standards and Trade Development Facility will receive EUR 500,000 (CHF 480,000) to help developing economies and LDCs implement food safety, animal health and plant health standards required for international trade. It will also help to improve their sanitary and phytosanitary capacity in line with the most recent STDF Strategy covering the period 2025-2030.

    Deputy Director-General Zhang said: “Given the pace of changes we are experiencing in trade, the value of technical assistance is more important than ever. With France’s targeted support, these programmes continue to make significant contributions to developing economies by providing hands-on experience at the WTO, facilitating practical projects and establishing sustainable systems to help government officials tackle complex new areas with the help of academia.”

    France has contributed just over EUR 34 million (approximately CHF 33 million) to the various WTO trust funds over more than 20 years.

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI Economics: Call for applications launched for support to women exporters through WTO-ITC WEIDE Fund

    Source: WTO

    Headline: Call for applications launched for support to women exporters through WTO-ITC WEIDE Fund

    A joint initiative of the World Trade Organization (WTO) and the International Trade Centre (ITC), the WEIDE Fund is supported by a USD 50 million commitment to empower women entrepreneurs and help them thrive in global markets through the use of digital tools and platforms.
    WTO Director-General Dr Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala emphasized the importance of inclusive access to digital trade opportunities: “Digital trade is reshaping the global economy. Women — including those in developing countries — must be at the forefront. The WTO-ITC WEIDE Fund is about powering growth, innovation and job creation. It reflects the WTO’s broader commitment to sustainable and inclusive re-globalization, where no one is left behind.”
    The WEIDE Fund offers two types of grants:
    Discovery Grant (up to USD 5,000): For early-stage businesses exploring digital trade opportunities.
    Booster Grant (up to USD 30,000): For businesses ready to scale up their digital presence and expand into global markets.
    Beyond financial support, the WEIDE Fund provides technical assistance, mentorship and access to international business networks. The initiative aims to build the long-term competitiveness and resilience of women-led micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs) involved in e-commerce, online services, or other forms of digital trade as well as those ready to engage in these activities.
    ITC Executive Director Pamela Coke-Hamilton highlighted the importance of removing barriers for women in global trade: “ITC is committed to breaking barriers for women exporters and ensuring they have the resources needed to succeed in the digital economy. The WTO-ITC WEIDE Fund is an opportunity for women-led businesses to access not only funding but also the expertise and networks critical for long-term success.”
    The WEIDE Fund announced on 7 March the selection of four pilot beneficiary countries: Dominican Republic, Jordan, Mongolia and Nigeria. Business support organizations in these countries were selected from a competitive call for proposals to implement programmes that can help women entrepreneurs expand their business through international trade and digitalization.
    To be eligible for support, women-led businesses must be:
    Registered and operational in the Dominican Republic, Jordan, Mongolia, or Nigeria
    Export-ready and keen to engage in digital trade
    Able to demonstrate potential for business growth and job creation
    The application period runs from 22 April to 18 May 2025 for the Dominican Republic, Mongolia and Nigeria. Applications from Jordan will be accepted at a later stage.
    In each country, the WEIDE Fund collaborates with the following business support organizations (BSOs) to strengthen outreach and local engagement:
    ProDominicana
    Jordan Enterprise Development Corporation (JEDCO)
    Mongolian National Chamber of Commerce and Industry (MNCCI)
    Nigerian Export Promotion Council (NEPC)
    The WEIDE Fund has been made possible through the support of the United Arab Emirates and the FIFA World Cup Qatar 2022 Legacy Fund.
    For more details on eligibility and how to apply, visit wto.org/weidefund or contact [email protected].

    Share

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI Economics: Verizon delivered strong financial growth with industry-leading wireless service revenue in 1Q 2025

    Source: Verizon

    Headline: Verizon delivered strong financial growth with industry-leading wireless service revenue in 1Q 2025

    Download News Release PDF

    Download 1Q Financials PDF

    Download Infographic PDF

    Download Non-GAAP Reconciliations PDF

    Key 1Q 2025 Highlights

    • Industry-leading total wireless service revenue1 of $20.8 billion
    • Best wireless retail core prepaid2 net additions since the TracFone acquisition 
    • Continued to take broadband market share with strong demand for Fios and fixed wireless access 
    • Verizon exits first quarter with momentum in both mobility and broadband

    NEW YORK – Verizon Communications Inc. (NYSE, Nasdaq: VZ) today reported strong financial performance for the first-quarter of 2025, fueled by innovative and segmented product offerings that meet the ever-changing needs of consumers and businesses across market sectors. The company’s strategically designed portfolio of diversified wireless and broadband products and adjacent services positioned Verizon for a successful quarter, as well as resiliency in any economic environment. With a focus on growing connections and strengthening customer relationships, the company’s strategic and disciplined approach drove success across its three priorities of growing wireless service revenue, expanding adjusted EBITDA3 and generating strong free cash flow3. Verizon remains confident in achieving its 2025 goals and delivering on its full-year guidance.

    “Verizon plays an essential role in our customers’ lives and our differentiated value proposition delivers what customers want and need, on their terms,” said Verizon Chairman and CEO Hans Vestberg. “We continue to drive our multi-year customer-first strategy, launching new programs such as our 3-year price lock and free phone guarantee for consumers and My Biz Plan for small and medium sized businesses. With our high quality customer base, network superiority and position of financial strength, we have the momentum and flexibility to continue innovating to meet customer needs and invest for growth.”

    1Q 2025 Highlights

    Consolidated: Improved earnings per share (EPS), revenue and net income in first-quarter 2025, highlighting strong financials

    • EPS of $1.15 in first-quarter 2025 compared to EPS of $1.09 in first-quarter 2024; adjusted EPS3, excluding special items, of $1.19 compared to $1.15 in first-quarter 2024.
    • Total operating revenue of $33.5 billion in first-quarter 2025, up 1.5 percent year over year.
    • Cash flow from operations totaled $7.8 billion in first-quarter 2025, up from $7.1 billion in first-quarter 2024.  
    • Free cash flow3 was $3.6 billion in first-quarter 2025, up from $2.7 billion in first-quarter 2024.  
    • Consolidated net income for first-quarter 2025 was $5.0 billion compared to $4.7 billion in first-quarter 2024. Consolidated adjusted EBITDA3 was $12.6 billion in first-quarter 2025 compared to $12.1 billion in first-quarter 2024. 
    • Verizon’s total unsecured debt as of the end of first-quarter 2025 was $117.3 billion, compared to $117.9 billion at the end of fourth-quarter 2024 and $128.4 billion at the end of first-quarter 2024. The company’s net unsecured debt3 at the end of first-quarter 2025 was $115.1 billion. At the end of first-quarter 2025, Verizon’s ratio of unsecured debt to net income (LTM) was 6.4 times and net unsecured debt to consolidated adjusted EBITDA ratio3 was 2.3 times.

    Mobility: Industry-leading wireless service revenue in first-quarter 2025

    • Total wireless service revenue in first-quarter 2025 was an industry-leading $20.8 billion, up 2.7 percent year over year. 
    • Wireless equipment revenue of $5.4 billion in first-quarter 2025, up 0.7 percent year over year. 
    • Total postpaid phone net losses of 289,000 in first-quarter 2025 compared to 114,000 postpaid phone net losses in first-quarter 2024.

    Broadband: Verizon continued to take broadband market share with strong demand for best in class Fios and fixed wireless access offerings

    • Broadband net additions of 339,000 in first-quarter 2025. 
    • Total fixed wireless access net additions of 308,000 in first-quarter 2025, growing the base to over 4.8 million fixed wireless access subscribers. The company is well-positioned to achieve the next milestone of 8 to 9 million fixed wireless access subscribers by 2028. 
    • Fios internet net additions were 45,000 in first-quarter 2025 compared to 53,000 in first-quarter 2024. 
    • Total broadband connections grew to more than 12.6 million as of the end of first-quarter 2025, representing a 13.7 percent increase year over year.  

    Verizon Consumer: Total revenue increases year over year to $25.6 billion in first-quarter 2025, driven by service revenue gains

    • Total Verizon Consumer revenue in first-quarter 2025 was $25.6 billion, an increase of 2.2 percent year over year, predominantly driven by gains in wireless service revenue. 
    • Consumer wireless service revenue in first-quarter 2025 was $17.2 billion, up 2.6 percent year over year.
    • Consumer wireless retail postpaid churn was 1.13 percent in first-quarter 2025, and wireless retail postpaid phone churn was 0.90 percent. 
    • Consumer wireless postpaid average revenue per account (ARPA) of $146.46 in first-quarter 2025, an increase of 3.6 percent year over year. 
    • In first-quarter 2025, Consumer reported 356,000 wireless retail postpaid phone net losses compared to 194,000 postpaid phone net losses in first-quarter 2024. 
    • In first-quarter 2025, Consumer reported 137,000 wireless retail core prepaid2 net additions compared to 131,000 net losses in first-quarter 2024. 
    • Consumer reported 199,000 fixed wireless net additions and 41,000 Fios Internet net additions in first-quarter 2025. Consumer Fios revenue was $2.9 billion in first-quarter 2025. 
    • In first-quarter 2025, Consumer operating income was $7.4 billion, an increase of 0.7 percent year over year, and segment operating income margin was 29.0 percent, compared to 29.4 percent in first-quarter 2024. Segment EBITDA3 in first-quarter 2025 was $11.0 billion, an increase of 2.7 percent year over year. These results were driven by improvements in Consumer wireless service revenue. Segment EBITDA margin3 in first-quarter 2025 was 42.8 percent compared to 42.6 percent in first-quarter 2024.

    Verizon Business: Operating income increases with strong wireless service revenue growth

    • Total Verizon Business revenue was $7.3 billion in first-quarter 2025, a decrease of 1.2 percent year over year. 
    • Business wireless service revenue in first-quarter 2025 was $3.6 billion, an increase of 2.8 percent year over year. 
    • Business reported 94,000 wireless retail postpaid net additions in first-quarter 2025. This result included 67,000 postpaid phone net additions. 
    • Business wireless retail postpaid churn was 1.52 percent in first-quarter 2025, and wireless retail postpaid phone churn was 1.15 percent. 
    • Business reported 109,000 fixed wireless net additions in first-quarter 2025.
    • In first-quarter 2025, Verizon Business operating income was $664 million, an increase of 66.4 percent year over year, resulting in segment operating income margin of 9.1 percent, an increase from 5.4 percent in first-quarter 2024. Segment EBITDA3 in first-quarter 2025 was $1.7 billion, an increase of 10.3 percent year over year. Segment EBITDA margin3 in first-quarter 2025 was 23.1 percent, an increase from 20.7 percent in first-quarter 2024.

    Outlook and guidance 

    The company does not provide a reconciliation for certain of the following adjusted (non-GAAP) forecasts because it cannot, without unreasonable effort, predict the special items that could arise, and the company is unable to address the probable significance of the unavailable information.

    For 2025, Verizon continues to expect the following: 

    • Total wireless service revenue1 growth of 2.0 percent to 2.8 percent.
    • Adjusted EBITDA3 growth of 2.0 percent to 3.5 percent.
    • Adjusted EPS3 growth of 0 to 3.0 percent.
    • Cash flow from operations of $35.0 billion to $37.0 billion.
    • Capital expenditures between $17.5 billion and $18.5 billion. 
    • Free cash flow3 of $17.5 billion to $18.5 billion. 

    Our 2025 financial guidance does not reflect any assumptions regarding the potential impacts of the evolving tariff environment.

    1 Total wireless service revenue represents the sum of Consumer and Business segments. Reflects the reclassification of recurring device protection and insurance related plan revenues from other revenue into wireless service revenue in the first quarter of 2025. Where applicable, historical results have been recast to conform to the current period presentation.

    2 Represents total prepaid results excluding our SafeLink brand.

    3 Non-GAAP financial measure. See the accompanying schedules and www.verizon.com/about/investors for reconciliations of non-GAAP financial measures cited in this document to most directly comparable financial measures under generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).

    Verizon Communications Inc. (NYSE, Nasdaq: VZ) powers and empowers how its millions of customers live, work and play, delivering on their demand for mobility, reliable network connectivity and security. Headquartered in New York City, serving countries worldwide and nearly all of the Fortune 500, Verizon generated revenues of $134.8 billion in 2024. Verizon’s world-class team never stops innovating to meet customers where they are today and equip them for the needs of tomorrow. For more, visit verizon.com or find a retail location at verizon.com/stores.


    Forward-looking statements

    In this communication we have made forward-looking statements. These statements are based on our estimates and assumptions and are subject to risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements include the information concerning our possible or assumed future results of operations. Forward-looking statements also include those preceded or followed by the words “anticipates,” “assumes,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “forecasts,” “hopes,” “intends,” “plans,” “targets” or similar expressions. For those statements, we claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. We undertake no obligation to revise or publicly release the results of any revision to these forward-looking statements, except as required by law. Given these risks and uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. The following important factors, along with those discussed in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), could affect future results and could cause those results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements: the effects of competition in the markets in which we operate, including the inability to successfully respond to competitive factors such as prices, promotional incentives and evolving consumer preferences; failure to take advantage of, or respond to competitors’ use of, developments in technology, including artificial intelligence, and address changes in consumer demand; performance issues or delays in the deployment of our 5G network resulting in significant costs or a reduction in the anticipated benefits of the enhancement to our networks; the inability to implement our business strategy; adverse conditions in the U.S. and international economies, including inflation and changing interest rates in the markets in which we operate; changes to international trade and tariff policies and related economic and other impacts; cyberattacks impacting our networks or systems and any resulting financial or reputational impact; damage to our infrastructure or disruption of our operations from natural disasters, extreme weather conditions, acts of war, terrorist attacks or other hostile acts and any resulting financial or reputational impact; disruption of our key suppliers’ or vendors’ provisioning of products or services, including as a result of geopolitical factors or the potential impacts of global climate change; material adverse changes in labor matters and any resulting financial or operational impact; damage to our reputation or brands; the impact of public health crises on our business, operations, employees and customers; changes in the regulatory environment in which we operate, including any increase in restrictions on our ability to operate our networks or businesses; allegations regarding the release of hazardous materials or pollutants into the environment from our, or our predecessors’, network assets and any related government investigations, regulatory developments, litigation, penalties and other liability, remediation and compliance costs, operational impacts or reputational damage; our high level of indebtedness; significant litigation and any resulting material expenses incurred in defending against lawsuits or paying awards or settlements; an adverse change in the ratings afforded our debt securities by nationally accredited ratings organizations or adverse conditions in the credit markets affecting the cost, including interest rates, and/or availability of further financing; significant increases in benefit plan costs or lower investment returns on plan assets; changes in tax laws or regulations, or in their interpretation, or challenges to our tax positions, resulting in additional tax expense or liabilities; changes in accounting assumptions that regulatory agencies, including the SEC, may require or that result from changes in the accounting rules or their application, which could result in an impact on earnings; and risks associated with mergers, acquisitions, divestitures and other strategic transactions, including our ability to consummate the proposed acquisition of Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. and obtain cost savings, synergies and other anticipated benefits within the expected time period or at all.

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI Economics: World Economic Outlook Press Briefing

    Source: International Monetary Fund

    April 22, 2025

    Speakers:

    Pierre‑Olivier Gourinchas, Director, Research Department, IMF
    Petya Koeva Brooks, Deputy Director, Research Department, IMF
    Deniz Igan, Division Chief, Research Department, IMF

    Moderator:
    Jose Luis De Haro, Communications Officer, IMF   

    Mr. De Haro: OK. I think we can start and we have a quorum. So good morning, everyone, and welcome. I want to welcome also those joining us online. I am Jose Luis de Haro with the Communications Department at the IMF and we are gathered here today for the presentation of our latest edition of the World Economic Outlook titled, “A Critical Juncture Amid Policy Shifts.” I hope by this time you all have had access to the document. If not, I am going to encourage you, as always, to go to IMF.org. There, you are going to find the document, the World Economic Outlook, also Pierre‑Olivier’s blog and many other assets, including the underlying data for some of the charts that are published on the World Economic Outlook.

    I also want to plug in that we have a new database portal that I encourage you to use, and what’s best, that to discuss the new outlook that having here with us today, Pierre‑Olivier Gourinchas. He is the Economic Counsellor, the chief economist, and the Director of the Research Department. Next to him are Petya Koeva Brooks, she is the Deputy Director of the Research Department and last, but not least, we also have Deniz Igan, she is the division chief also with the Research Department.

    Pierre‑Olivier, as usual is going to start with some opening remarks, and then we are going to open the floor to your questions. I just want to remind everyone that this press briefing, it’s on the record and that we also have simultaneous translation.

    So let me stop here. Pierre‑Olivier, the floor is yours.

    Mr. Gourinchas: Thank you, Jose. And good morning, everyone. The landscape has changed since our last World Economic Outlook update in January. We are entering a new era as the global economic system that has operated for the last 80 years is being reset. Since late January, many tariff announcements have been made, culminating on April 2, with near universal levies from the United States and counterresponses from some trading partners. The U.S. effective tariff rate has surged past levels reached more than 100 years ago, while tariff rates on the U.S. have also increased.

    Beyond the abrupt increase in tariffs, the surge in policy uncertainty is a major driver of the economic outlook. If sustained, the increasing trade tensions and uncertainty will slow global growth significantly. Reflecting this complexity, our report presents a reference forecast which incorporates policy announcements up to April 4 by the U.S. and trading partners. Under these reference forecasts, global growth will reach 2.8 percent this year and 3 percent next year, a cumulative downgrade of about 0.8 percentage points relative to our January 2025 WEO update. Our report also offers a range of forecasts under different policy assumptions.

    Under an alternative path that excludes the April tariff announcements, global growth would have seen only a modest downgrade to 3.2 percent this year. We will also use a model‑based forecast to incorporate the temporary suspension of most tariffs announced on April 9, together with the increase in bilateral tariffs between China and the U.S. to prohibitive levels. This pause, even if extended permanently, delivers a similar growth outlook as a reference forecast, 2.8 percent, even if some highly tariffed countries could benefit.

    Now, while global growth remains well above recession levels, all regions are negatively impacted this year and next. And the global disinflation process continues, but at a slower pace with inflation revised up by 0.1 percentage point in both years. These trade tensions will greatly impact global trade. We project that global trade growth will be more than cut in half from 3.8 percent last year to 1.7 percent this year. The tariffs will play out differently in different countries. For the United States, the tariffs represent a supply shock that reduces productivity and output permanently and increases price pressures temporarily. This adds to an already weakening outlook and leads us to revise growth down by 0.9 percentage points to 1.8 percent, with a 0.4 percentage point downgrade from the tariffs only. While inflation is revised upwards.

    For trading partners, tariffs act mostly as a negative external demand shock. Weakening activity and prices, even if some countries could benefit from trade diversion. This is why we have lowered our China growth forecast this year to 4 percent, while inflation is revised down by 0.8 percentage points, increasing deflationary pressures. All countries are negatively affected by the surge in trade policy uncertainty, as businesses cut purchases and investment, while financial institutions reassess their borrowers’ exposure. Uncertainty also increases because of the complex sectoral disruptions that tariffs could cause up and down supply chains, as we saw during the pandemic.

    The effect of these shocks on exchange rates is complex. The tariffs could appreciate the US dollar, as in previous episodes. However, greater policy uncertainty, lower U.S. growth prospects, and an adjustment in the global demand for dollar assets are weighing down on the dollar.

    Risks to the global economic have increased and are firmly to the downside.

    First, while we are not projecting a global downturn, the risks it may happen this year have increased substantially, from 17 percent projected back in October to 30 percent now. An escalation of trade tensions would further depress growth. Financial conditions could also tighten, as markets react negatively to diminished growth prospects and increased uncertainty. On the flip side, growth prospects could immediately improve if countries ease from their current trade policy stance and promote a new, clear, and stable trade environment.

    Addressing domestic imbalances can also help raise growth while contributing significantly to closing external imbalances. For Europe, this means spending more on public infrastructure to accelerate productivity growth. For China, it means boosting support for domestic demand. While for the U.S., it means stepping up fiscal consolidation.

    Turning to policies. Our recommendations call for prudence and improved collaboration. Let me outline some key ones. First, an obvious priority is to restore trade policy stability. The global economy needs a clear, stable, and predictable trading environment, one that addresses some of the longstanding gaps in international trading rules. Monetary policy will need to remain agile and respond by tightening where inflation pressures re‑emerge, while easing where weak demand dominates. Monetary policy credibility will be key, especially where inflation expectations might de‑anchor. And central bank independence remains a cornerstone.

    Many fiscal authorities will face new spending needs to bolster defense spending or to offset the trade dislocations, likely to come. Some of the poorest countries also hit with reduced official aid could experience debt distress. Yet debt levels are still elevated and most countries still need to rebuild fiscal space, including by implementing structural reforms. Support, where needed, should remain narrowly targeted and temporary. It is easier to turn on the fiscal tap than to turn it off. Where new spending needs are permanent, as for defense spending in some countries, planning for offsetting cuts elsewhere or new revenues should be made.

    Finally, even if some of the grievances against our trading system have merit, we should all work toward fixing the system so that it can deliver better opportunities to all. Thank you.

    Mr. De Haro: Thank you, Pierre‑Olivier. Before we open the floor to your questions, some ground rules. First of all, if you want to ask a question, raise your hand. If I call on you, please identify yourself and the media outlet you represent. Try to be succinct. Stick to one question. We want to answer as many questions as possible.

    And also, a reminder. We are here to discuss the World Economic Outlook. Those questions regarding country programs, institutional issues are going to be better placed for the regional press briefings that are happening later this week and also the Managing Director’s press briefing this Thursday.

    With that said, I want hands up. OK. So I am going to start here in the center. Then I am going to move the room to my left. Then to my right. I am going to start with the lady with the green jacket there.

    QUESTION: Thank you.. Thanks so much for doing this.

    Pierre‑Olivier, I wonder if you can speak a little bit to the fact that you haven’t called out a recession. And you know, we are hearing lots of economists in the United States and other places‑‑most recently yesterday, the IIF is now also forecasting a small recession in the second half of the year. What we see in the WEO is that the percentage of risk of a recession has increased pretty dramatically. Can you walk us through why you are not at this point calling a recession, for instance, likely in the United States and what it would take to tip it that way? Thanks.

    Mr. Gourinchas: Thank you, Andrea.

    So for the United States, we are projecting a significant slowdown. We are projecting growth will be at 1.8 percent in 2025. And that’s a 0.9 percentage‑point slowdown‑‑revision in our projections from January. But 1.9 percent is obviously not a recession. And the reason for this is is that we have a U.S. economy that, in our view, is coming from a position of strength. We had an economy that was growing very rapidly. We have a labor market that is still very robust. We have seen some signs of weakening and slowdown in the U.S. economy, even before the tariff announcements. So, in fact, the 0.9 percentage point downward revision that I just mentioned, only a part of this‑‑maybe 0.4 percentage points‑‑is coming from the tariffs. Some of that is also coming from weakening momentum. This was an economy that was doing very, very well but was self‑correcting and cooling off a bit on its own. And we were seeing already consumption numbers coming down. We are seeing consumer confidence coming down. So all of that was already factored in. But we are not seeing a recession in our reference forecast.

    As you mentioned, Andrea, we are‑‑when we do our risk assessment, if you want, we are seeing the probability of a recession increasing, from about 25 percent back in October to around 40 percent when we assess it now.

    Mr. De Haro: OK. I am going to move to this side. The lady here in red.

    QUESTION: Good morning.

    Pierre, I wanted to ask you about the downward pressure on the dollar now. To what extent you believe it can provide some relief from the pressure on highly indebted emerging economies with a large share of dollar‑denominated debt? And has this downward pressure on the dollar changed your outlook on all of those emerging economies that are still, you know, under the impact of the high debt‑‑as mentioned by the MD in previous meetings, where this high debt is really one of the impediments to growth? Thanks.

    Mr. Gourinchas: Yes. So we are seeing a weakening of the dollar that is fairly broad‑based over the last few weeks, as I mentioned in my opening remarks, some of that is coming from the weaker growth prospects in the U.S. Some it is coming from the increased uncertainty. And it’s leading to a reassessment of the global demand for dollar assets. When we step back, we also have to realize we are coming from a position where, over the last few years, there have been tremendous capital inflows into U.S. markets, in particular, risk markets. That’s something that, of course, my colleague Tobias Adrian will talk about in the GFSR press conference. So we are seeing some adjustment, some contradiction. The markets are handling it. We don’t see signs of stress, even in currency markets.

    Now, the interesting development is, what does it mean for emerging markets? And you are right to point out that, in the past, when the dollar would strengthen, that would not necessarily be good news for emerging markets because they have dollar‑denominated debts, so that increases their liabilities and the pressure on them to service their debts. And this can lead to some tightening of financial conditions. So we are not seeing that right now. And so that’s a plus. The flip side of this is, of course, the appreciation of some of these emerging markets’ currencies means that they are also losing a little bit on the competitiveness side, so there is maybe something that is a bit easier on the finance conditions, something that is not as easy on the trade side.

    Finally, this is an environment of enormous uncertainty, increased volatility. And that I think is something that will dominate for many of the emerging markets. So when we are looking at our assessment, we are actually downgrading the emerging market economies for 2025 and 2026, most of them. Some of them may, as I mentioned, benefit. But overall, as a group, they are downgraded. While because they are also very plugged into the global supply chains, the uncertainty is leading to a pause in investment and activity, and they are going to suffer from the decline in demand for their products coming from the tariffs.

    Mr. De Haro: OK. I am going to go with the gentleman here with the glasses.

    QUESTION: Thank you. I just have one question. Could you elaborate a little bit on what will happen with the trade flows in your models? I saw that in the basic assumption, the exports from the U.S. are [breaking quite heavily but not that much from China. Why is this so?

    And do I understand it right that this basic model does not yet integrate the additional hikes after ‑‑ happening after basically April 9, so above 100 percent on import tariffs by the U.S.? Thanks.

    Mr. Gourinchas: So we are seeing a large impact on global trade coming from the tariffs and that’s going to be the case under any combination of tariffs where the effective tariff rates remains very elevated. And the reason why when we looked at the different scenarios that I mentioned, whether it’s a reference scenario or our April 9 scenario which includes lower tariffs on many countries but sharply increased tariffs between the U.S. and China. The overall impact on the global economy is not very different because the effective tariff rate is, if anything, even higher under that pause. So global trade is going to be significantly affected. The particular configuration of trade, which bilateral trade flows are going to be affected versus others that will depend on the final landscape in terms of tariffs so we can anticipate that there will be much lower bilateral trade under either the reference scenario or the April 9, between the U.S. and China. And that is weighing down on global trade growth. This is weighing down on global trade generally.

    Mr. De Haro: OK. I am going to turn here to the center. I am going to go to the first row. I am going to go with the lady with the yellow bottle.

    QUESTION: Thank you,

    You have downgraded the U.K.’s growth forecast quite sharply and given the range of explanations, from higher tariff barriers to more domestic issues, like cost‑of‑living pressures. Out of those, so the global challenges versus domestic challenges, which one is weighing more heavily on the U.K.’s growth forecasts?

    Mr. De Haro: OK we are going to open the round of U.K. questions so if you have questions on the U.K., raise your hand. And I will pass the mic to you. I see  two there. Yep.

    QUESTION: Hi.

    In a world where everyone is warning about the impact of tariffs on U.S. inflation and how much it will raise U.S. prices, why do you have the U.K. with the highest inflation rate in the G‑7 this year? And do you believe tariffs will be inflationary or disinflationary for the U.K.?

    Mr. De Haro: OK. Joe here in the first row.

    QUESTION: Yeah. Thank you. Thank you very much. So Joel hills from ITV news. Obviously it’s impacting the tariffs are impacting the U.K. They are impacting most countries. I just wonder this, President Trump did say there would be some disruption. He suggested it would be sort of temporary. Is it possible that President Trump is actually a genius? That he knows something you do not?

    Mr. De Haro: And I think we have a last question on the U.K. and this is going to be the last question on the U.K. There on the back of the room.

    QUESTION: Yeah.

    The U.K. inflation forecast is, you know, much higher than we expected it to be, 0.7 percent higher. Is that going to impact on lowering interest rates in the U.K.? And does that affect the growth rate, which seems to be rather optimistic, compared with some of the other European countries?

    Mr. De Haro: OK. We are going to be done with the U.K. questions and then we will move along. So Pierre‑Olivier.

    Mr. Gourinchas: Thank you. So many questions. Let me address them as best I can. First, on the revision for growth in the U.K. and inflation. So the tariffs are playing a role, as they are in most countries and uncertainty is also playing a role, as it is in all countries. And it’s weighing down on growth in the U.K. But there are some U.K.‑specific factors and I would say that in terms of the zero point 5 percentage point downward revision that we are saying for the U.K., the domestic factors are probably the biggest ones. And in particular, there is a lower carryover from weaker growth in the second half of last year. There is also some tightening of financial conditions, as interest rates have risen, longer‑term interest rates.

    On inflation, the revision in inflation in the U.K. is coming, again, from domestic factors, and in particular some change in regulated energy prices. So that’s expected to be temporary but it’s also very U.K.‑specific. The effect of the tariffs on countries like the U.K., like it is on the EU or China is like a negative demand shock. It’s weakening activity but it’s also lowering price pressures, not increasing them.

    Now, what is the impact of the tariffs in the medium and long term? Not just what’s going to happen this year and next but what’s going to happen longer term? Our assessment is it’s going to be negative. We have a box in our report that looks at the long‑term impact of the tariffs, if they are maintained. And it is negative for all regions, just like the short‑term impact. So we are seeing a negative impact in the short term, in the medium term, in the long term. Again, there are nuances. Some countries might benefit, depending on the particular configuration of tariffs. It might benefit from some trade diversion; but the broad picture is it’s negative for the outlook.

    Now, our ‑‑ and I will end with that. Our forecast for 2025 is slightly higher than OBR’s forecast. Some of this has to do with some of the underlying monetary policy assumptions for the U.K. The bank‑‑

    Our assumption for this year is that there are going to be four cuts through the year. One cut already happened. We expect three more.

    Mr. De Haro: Thank you, Pierre‑Olivier. I am not going to forget about the people that are on WebEx, and I am going to pass a question there. I see Anton from TAS.

    QUESTION: Good morning. Thank you for doing this.

    Given the projected slowdown of Russia’s GDP growth from 4.1 in 2024 to 1.5 in 2025, what are the primary factors driving this sharp decline? And how sustainable is Russia’s growth model going forward? Thank you.

    Mr. De Haro: Go ahead.

    Mr. Gourinchas: Petya, would you like to answer?

    Ms. Koeva Brooks: Sure. We are indeed expecting a slowdown in growth to 1.5 this year, and this, to a large extent is kind of the natural slowing of the economy after growing quite robustly in previous years. And also as a result of policy tightening that we have seen, both on the fiscal as well as on the monetary policy side. It is also due to the lower oil prices that have come about as a result of the‑‑as a response to the round of tariffs, as well as the uncertainty about global growth. So all these factors are behind that lower growth number, although I should point out that it is actually a slight upward revision, relative to what we had back in January. And the reason for that is that, again, we actually had seen upward surprises in 2024, which kind of carried into 2025.

    When it comes to the medium‑term growth outlook, we do expect that to be relatively weak. We are‑‑we have penciled in growth number of about 1.2, which is down from 1.7 which is what we had before the start of the war.

    Mr. De Haro: OK. Let’s continue. I am going to go again in the center and then I am going to go to that side. The lady with the glasses there.

    QUESTION: Hi.

    In Latin America, we received almost every country 10 percent. So I want to know about the impact of the tariffs in Latin America and if the impact is going to be limited, versus other regions, and when we are going to start to feeling this impact. Thank you.

    Mr. De Haro: And before we answer the question, are there any questions on Mexico, Brazil, Argentina? OK. Argentina friends, go ahead.

    QUESTION: Hello.

    You’ve kept 5.5 growth projection that was decided in the latest program that Argentina signed with the IMF. I would like to know why you are not seeing so much impact yet about‑‑of this general context.

    Mr. De Haro: OK. We can go ahead first with the Latin America overview and then we can go to Argentina.

    Mr. Gourinchas: I will just say something briefly and then ask my colleague Petya to come in. So for Latin America, as a whole, we are saying activity that is largely driven by consumption on the back of resilient labor markets while investment remains somewhat sluggish. And the slowdown in our projection reflects the impact of tariffs and the global growth slowdown, of course, which is also affecting countries in the region. Policy uncertainty. And the withdrawal of fiscal stimulus and in some countries monetary policy tightening.

    Ms. Koeva Brooks: I don’t have a lot to add. Just to say that the disinflation process has also slowed a bit, and this is also‑‑also makes the policy trade‑offs a bit more complicated with slow‑‑with growth slowing down and at the same time, you know, having still challenges on the inflation side.

    Mr. De Haro: OK. So we are going to move on. I am going to ask the gentleman in the first row there because‑‑

    Oh, sorry. Sorry. I forgot about Argentina. Please go ahead.

    Ms. Koeva Brooks: We cannot forget about Argentina.

    So the growth forecast for this year‑‑you are right‑‑we still have the upgrade of .5. And this is related to just the positive surprises that we had seen, in spite of a very strong fiscal adjustment, the recovery in confidence I think has definitely played a role in kind of driving us to have this forecast. That said, there are a number of risks related to tighter financial conditions, commodity prices, and a lot of others, which is true for many if not most other countries.

    Mr. De Haro: OK. So now we can move on. I am going to go with the gentleman in the first row.

    QUESTION: Thank you. In the October 2024 outlook you saw a stable but slow growth for Africa. What’s new now? And what kind of initiatives like the African Continental Free Trade Area do for African economies amidst these trade tensions?

    Mr. De Haro: And before we answer, I think‑‑

    QUESTION: Hi. Good morning.

    One of the things that you mentioned in your report is the demographic shift and the rise in the silver economy. Africa, on the other hand, has the reverse of that. So what is your recommendation in the short and medium term on how to deal with some of these challenges pertaining to tariffs, monetary policy, and now currency exchange? Thank you.

    Mr. De Haro: OK.

    Mr. Gourinchas: OK. Thank you. I will just say one word about the outlook in sub‑Saharan Africa and then I will ask my colleague Deniz to come in to add more color and answer also the question on the demographic trends.

    So regional growth in sub‑Saharan Africa improved significantly last year, to 4 percent. And it will ease in 2025. And this is in line with a softer global outlook. So we are seeing the same forces at play in the region, as we are seeing more globally. And a downturn‑‑and a downward revision in our projection that is of a similar magnitude at about 0.4 percentage point. Deniz?

    Ms. Igan: Thank you for the question. So on the demographic shifts, our Chapter 2 basically points out that countries’ age structures are evolving at different rates, as you pointed out as well. We have most western economies, some Asian economies that are aging fast. And you know in a health way some of them. And then we have many sub‑Saharan African countries that have a very young population. And what the chapter shows is actually, there are important medium‑term consequences of that, both for growth, as well as external balances of countries.

    In Africa’s case, basically, what we would see is a demographic dividend coming from having a young population. And the question then becomes how best to leverage that, how best to use that and channel it into growth. And the answer there, first and foremost, depends on the structural reforms, the investment that’s necessary on healthcare, on education, on human capital more generally and also international cooperation because our Chapter 3 looks more carefully into migration flows. And again, there, we see migration policy shifts in destination countries has spillovers for other countries. And this is especially true for emerging market economies and lower income economies. So, again, international cooperation there, making sure that growth dividends are utilized in the best way is what we delve into in the chapter.

    Mr. De Haro: OK. I am going to go to the gentleman with‑‑raise your hand. Yeah. You. No, I am going back. Then I will go‑‑there you go.

    QUESTION: OK. I have a question about China’s growth.

    In your World Economic Outlook, you say China’s growth forecast has been cut to 4 percent for this year, which is a 0.6 percentage drop from an earlier projection. But China’s National Bureau of Statistics a couple of days ago predicted China’s growth GDP growth in the first quarter was 5.4 percent. So my question is, how do you see the disparity in the forecast? Is China more optimistic than you are? Thank you.

    Mr. Gourinchas: Thank you. So, yes, we are revising our growth projections for China down by 0.6 percentage points, as you have noted. I should flag that this number does not incorporate the latest release for Q1. That came after we closed our round of projections. So this is not reflected there. And we will have to see how it affects our projections when we have our next round of WEO updates.

    But let me give you a little bit of perspective on the rationale behind our revision for China. The tariff increase in tariffs especially since China is one of the countries that is facing the most elevated tariffs right now, is going to have a very significant impact in our projections on the Chinese economy. In fact, when we do a decomposition, which I showed during my opening remarks, the impact of the tariffs on the Chinese economy would be a negative 1.3 percentage point revision on growth.

    So why do we only have 0.6? Well, because there are other factors that are helping to support Chinese growth in 2025 and 2026. One of which‑‑which is quite important‑‑is the fiscal support that has been announced since the beginning of the year. And that is adding up, something of the amount of 0.5 percentage points. So the impact of the current trade tensions is very significant. It’s partly offset. We expect it to remain quite significant also in 2026 when we also have a downward revision by about 0.5 percentage points.

    The other side of this, where we are seeing the impact of the tariffs is on inflation, which is revised down. Our headline inflation projection for 2025 is actually at zero. So it’s down from 0.8 percent to zero. So China is facing stronger deflationary forces as a result of these trade tensions.

    Mr. De Haro: OK. I am going to move to this side. The gentleman with the glasses here.

    QUESTION: What impact did the oil price also have in exporting and importing countries in the Middle East? Thank you.

    Mr. De Haro: Go ahead.

    Mr. Gourinchas: So we have seen oil prices declining since our last projections, and the decline in oil prices in our and our interpretation is coming mostly from weaker global demand, so it’s the weakening of global activity that is driving the decline in prices. There has been some increase in supply coming from OPEC Plus countries, but broadly speaking, the decline is mostly coming from weaker demand.

    So that is going to play out in ways you sort of would expect. The commodity exporters are going to face lower export revenues from the decline in oil prices. That’s going to weigh on their fiscal outlook, on their growth.

    For those countries that are oil importers, it’s going to lower inflation pressures because that‑‑lower oil prices is going to feed into lower headline inflation. It’s going to also provide some modest support to economic activity there.

    Deniz, anything to add on oil prices or‑‑or Petya?

    Ms. Koeva Brooks: No, I don’t.

    Mr. De Haro: OK. We are going to move to the center. I am going to get the gentleman with the white shirt there.

    QUESTION: h I am not going to ask another question about the U.K., you will be pleased to know. Over the last week we have seen a number of attacks by the White House on the independence of the Federal Reserve. How destabilizing do you think this might be for financial markets?

    Mr. Gourinchas: So central banks are facing a delicate moment. As I have explained in many countries, the impact of the tariffs is going to be to increase recessionary forces and it is going to lower price pressures. And that will help central banks cut interest rates faster and provide some support to their economies. But in other countries ‑‑ and in our projections, the U.S. is in that category‑‑the tariffs are going to increase price pressures. Price pressures in the U.S. are increasing for other reasons as well. Service prices have been quite‑‑inflation of service prices have been quite strong. And that is something that we are seeing already. But the tariffs are likely to increase price pressures. We are projecting inflation to remain at 3 percent in the U.S. this year, the same level as last year, headline inflation.

    So in that context, if you also think about where we are coming from, we are coming from a period of very elevated inflation. We are just coming off the cost‑of‑living crisis, a surge in inflation rates to double digits that we haven’t seen in more than a generation. So the critical thing is to make sure that inflation expectations remain anchored, that everyone remains convinced that central banks will do what is necessary to bring inflation back to central bank targets in an orderly manner. And central banks have instruments to do this. They have their interest rate instruments. They have various instruments of monetary policy. But one critical aspect of what they do is coming from their credibility. So central banks need to remain credible. And part of that credibility is built upon their central bank independence. And so from that perspective, it’s very important to preserve that.

    Mr. De Haro: OK. We are going to have time for two questions. One of them is going back to WebEx. I see Weier, please. Come in.

    QUESTION: Yes.I have a question.

    You mentioned that the global economic system is being reset. And I am not sure if one of the early signs in the financial markets, as we see that the markets moving from American exceptionalism to the sort of sell the U.S. narrative. So could you assess the implications for the financial markets and the world economy, as a whole?

    Mr. Gourinchas: Yeah, well we have seen some volatility in the markets, of course, whenever there is going to be potentially a significant change in the economic structure of the global economy. I think we are bound to see some reassessment. And investors are going to try to figure out what’s happening, and that’s going to inject volatility. And we are seeing some of that.

    The good news is a lot of that volatility we have seen in the last few weeks has not led to significant market dislocations or market stress to levels that would, for instance, have necessitated the interventions by central banks around the world.

    So whether you are looking at equity markets, whether you are looking at bond markets, whether you are looking at currency markets, what we are saying is a reassessment of the world we are in now and that means that there is a reassessment of valuations of risk assets, of different currencies. But that is happening in an orderly manner. So from that perspective, we are seeing a system that is quite resilient, that remained resilient but, of course, we are watching carefully and there has been some tightening of financial conditions and that’s something to be looking out for. We want to make sure that it doesn’t get to a level where the stress in the financial system would become too extreme.

    Mr. De Haro: OK. The lady here in the first row has been waiting patiently. Please go ahead.

    QUESTION: Thank you, Jose. I want to ask about the trading tensions impact on low‑income countries. You mentioned there are like downgrading for emerging markets but how about like those small countries who have lower income as a group, have you assessed the particular impact on them in these ongoing trade tensions? Thank you.

    Mr. Gourinchas: OK. Well thanks. For low‑income countries as a group, we are also seeing a downgrade in which we report in our report of 0.4 percentage points. We are expecting growth of 4.2 percent in 2025. So the 0.4 is very similar to what we are seeing at the aggregate levels, 0.5. So from that perspective it looks quite the same. However, there are also a lot of differences across countries, and when we look more carefully, you might see some vulnerable countries, especially in sub‑Saharan Africa. But elsewhere as well‑‑who could face very challenging conditions as a result of the tariffs in an environment in which many of the countries, low‑income countries have been facing a funding squeeze for a number of years now, private capital flows to this region have been drying up or have been coming on very expensive terms. We are seeing a drying up also of some official aid flows. So some of these countries have very limited fiscal space. Near a situation where the situation could become more challenging.

    Now, on the flip side, the fact that we are seeing commodity prices coming down for many commodities will help some of them. The commodity importers in that group will hurt the ones who are commodity exporters. And there are a number of countries among the low-income group that are commodity exporters, so that is adding some additional pressure on them.

    Mr. De Haro: I am going to make an exception and just one last question. I am going to go with the gentleman in the white shirt there. He has been waiting patiently, too. And don’t get frustrated. There are going to be many opportunities for you to ask questions.

    QUESTION: Thank you, Jose. AFP.

    I had a quick question about Spain because that’s the only countries among advanced economies where you had an upward revision. It’s going to be way better than the eurozone and even better than other advanced economies. What are the underlying reasons for that? And you formally talked much about tourism but are there any other things that might be pointed out? Thank you.

    Mr. Gourinchas: Yes, indeed. Spain is doing better than its peers. Petya, would you like to talk about it?

    Ms. Koeva Brooks: Sure. Indeed. We are actually having an upgrade for Spain this year, which is a rare occurrence in the many, many downgrades that we have had for many other countries. This is partly because the Spanish economy just had such strong momentum in 2024, coming into 2025. And part of that was due to the very strong services exports as well as the very strong labor accumulation. Part of that related to immigration. But all of that being said, Spain is still being affected indirectly and directly by the tariffs and the uncertainty associated with that. It’s just that, as I said, that underlying [strength is kind of having a bigger impact in the near term. But then again, in 2026, we do project kind of a slowing of growth to about 1.8.

    Mr. De Haro: OK. And on that point, I want to thank you, everyone, on behalf of Pierre‑Olivier, Petya, Deniz, the Research Department, the Communications Department. Some reminders. Next press briefing is going to happen in this same room, Global Financial Stability Report, please stay tuned. Tomorrow you have the Fiscal Monitor, and then later in the week, you have the Managing Director’s press briefing and also all the regional press briefings that we have been talking about. Thank you very much for your time. If you have questions, comments, send them my way to media@imf.org and hopefully you have a great week. I am sure it’s going to be busy.

    IMF Communications Department
    MEDIA RELATIONS

    PRESS OFFICER: Jose De Haro

    Phone: +1 202 623-7100Email: MEDIA@IMF.org

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Dmytro Patrushev and Kherson Region Governor Volodymyr Saldo Discussed Development of Regional Agriculture

    Translartion. Region: Russians Fedetion –

    Source: Government of the Russian Federation – An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.

    Deputy Prime Minister Dmytro Patrushev held a working meeting with the Governor of the Kherson region Volodymyr Saldo. The topics of the meeting were the development of the region’s agro-industrial and fisheries complexes and environmental issues.

    The Vice Prime Minister and the Governor discussed the situation in agriculture. The topic of restoring orchards in the region, in particular fruit and berry orchards, was touched upon. The issue of restoring the irrigation system was also raised. This year, six projects were submitted for the competitive selection in the field of melioration from the Kherson region.

    Dmytro Patrushev drew attention to the importance of high-quality spring field work in the Kherson region. The region should monitor the implementation of the structure of sowing areas, as well as the provision of farmers with financial resources and means of production – seeds, mineral fertilizers, fuels and lubricants, agricultural machinery.

    The development of the regional fisheries complex was also discussed at the meeting. The need was noted not only to increase the volume of catch of aquatic bioresources in the region, but also to expand the range, increase the production of products with high added value. This will allow the creation of highly efficient production and new jobs.

    In addition, Dmitry Patrushev and Volodymyr Saldo discussed the results of the implementation of the national project “Ecology” and the readiness of the Kherson region for the events of the new national project “Ecological Well-being”. The region takes part in four federal projects: “Closed-loop Economy”, “Water of Russia”, “Forest Preservation” and “General Cleaning”. By 2030, the region is planned to be allocated more than 2 billion rubles under these projects.

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: DPIIT and Stride Ventures announce the winner of the Bharat Startup Grand Challenge 2025, with funding of up to INR 10 crore

    Source: Government of India

    Posted On: 22 APR 2025 4:28PM by PIB Delhi

    The Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT), in partnership with  Startup India and Stride Ventures, announced the startup Buoyancy Plastics for Change Recycling Private Limited as the winner of the Bharat Startup Grand Challenge 2025, an initiative aimed at recognizing and empowering high-impact, homegrown startups.

    The winner was chosen from over 120 startup applications received during the 30 days of running the challenge. Applications were received from 22 states of the country, from startups working in the sustainability, fintech and e-mobility sector.

    The winner of this Challenge, Plastics for Change, was founded in 2015, and focuses on building a Fair Trade verified recycled plastics supply chain. The company is currently focused on ethical sourcing and aggregation of plastic waste to provide high-quality rPET, rHDPE and rPP materials to recycling units. Working directly with informal waste and plastics collectors and integrating them into the formal economy, the startup currently has a collection capacity of more than 20,000-ton and is now aiming to further deepen its presence in the Indian plastics recycling sector.

    Stride Ventures is the largest venture debt fund in India, having committed over $1 Billion to over 170 new-age startups in the last five years. Stride has now expanded its footprint to Singapore, Abu Dhabi, Riyadh and London. Earlier this year, Stride Ventures signed an MOU with DPIIT to provide funding, network, market access as well as mentorship support to budding startups across the country, as well as help Indian startups scale globally.

    This was the first time Stride Ventures hosted a Bharat Startup Grand Challenge. For the winner’s, Stride Ventures announced investing up to ₹10 Crore, subject to due diligence, along with further ecosystem support, mentorship and access to Stride’s network to help further scale up the startup’s endeavours in sustainability and circularity in India.

    ***

    Abhishek Dayal/Abhijith Narayanan

    (Release ID: 2123468) Visitor Counter : 48

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: TRAI releases recommendations on ‘the issues Related to Critical Services in the M2M Sector, and Transfer of Ownership of M2M SIMs’

    Source: Government of India

    Ministry of Communications

    TRAI releases recommendations on ‘the issues Related to Critical Services in the M2M Sector, and Transfer of Ownership of M2M SIMs’

    Posted On: 22 APR 2025 3:27PM by PIB Delhi

    Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) has today released its recommendations on ‘the issues Related to Critical Services in the M2M Sector, and Transfer of Ownership of M2M SIMs’

    1. Earlier, Department of Telecommunications (DoT), through its letter dated 01.01.2024, had referred to the TRAI’s recommendations dated 05.09.2017 on ‘Spectrum, Roaming and QoS related requirements in Machine-to-Machine (M2M) Communications’, and had requested TRAI to provide reconsidered recommendations, as per the provisions of Section 11 of the TRAI Act 1997 on the following issues:
    1. Identification of Critical Services in the M2M Sector
    2. Transfer of Ownership of M2M SIMs
    1. In this regard, TRAI, on 24.06.2024, issued a consultation paper on ‘the Issues Related to Critical Services in the M2M Sector, and Transfer of Ownership of M2M SIMs’ for soliciting comments and counter comments from stakeholders. In response, TRAI received 16 comments and one counter-comment from stakeholders. An open house discussion on the consultation paper was held on 24.10.2024 through virtual mode.
    1. Based on the comments received from stakeholders and on its own analysis, TRAI has finalized its recommendations on ‘the Issues Related to Critical Services in the M2M Sector, and Transfer of Ownership of M2M SIMs’.
    1. Machine to Machine (M2M) communication can enable applications and services across a broad range of vertical markets such as automotive, utilities, healthcare, safety & surveillance, financial, public safety, smart city and agriculture. At present, the M2M ecosystem is at an early stage of growth of its lifecycle. As the M2M ecosystem matures, and thereby gains user confidence, more and more services will be delivered to individuals, enterprises and public institutions by using Internet of Things (IoT). Many of such services would be critical IoT services, requiring ultra-reliable, low latency M2M connectivity with very high availability. As critical IoT will be used for delivering services of critical importance, the identification of services as critical IoT service requires to be done well in advance. The identification of a service as a critical IoT service would enable user agencies to enter into suitable service level agreements (SLAs) with telecom service providers. Through the SLAs, telecom service providers may be held accountable for ensuring that the M2M connectivity provided by them meets the requisite telecommunication service performance parameters (such as latency, reliability, and availability) which are sacrosanct for the successful operation of the concerned critical IoT service. Through these recommendations, TRAI has recommended a broad guiding framework for classifying a service as a ‘critical IoT service’. TRAI has recommended that a service should be classified as a ‘critical IoT service’, if it passes the following twin tests:
    1. Whether the service (application) demands ultra-reliable low-latency M2M connectivity with very high availability? 
    2. Whether any disruption of the M2M connectivity used for delivering the service (application) will have a debilitating impact on national security, economy, public health, or public safety?
    1. TRAI has recommended that the classification of critical IoT services of a particular domain/ sector should be done by the ministry/ regulatory body concerned in consultation with Department of Telecommunications (DoT).
    1. TRAI has also recommended that for the classification of critical IoT services, DoT should devise an institutional mechanism for the assistance of concerned ministries/ regulatory bodies.
    1. TRAI has recommended a technology-agnostic approach for the provision of critical IoT services. Specifically, TRAI has recommended that any wireless M2M communication technology (utilizing unlicensed spectrum, or licensed spectrum) or wired M2M communication technology should be permitted to be used for the provision of critical IoT services if it meets the prescribed service performance benchmarks.
    1. Owing to the pervasive nature of the deployment of IoT devices in all walks of life, the importance of security and privacy requirements of IoT devices is paramount. The security and privacy concerns from IoT devices emanate essentially from the M2M communication modules embedded in them through which IoT devices get connected to telecommunication networks including public internet. With a view to allaying security and privacy concerns in respect of IoT devices, particularly those which are used in critical sectors, TRAI has recommended that the M2M communication modules embedded/ plugged in all IoT devices (which are capable of being connected to telecommunication networks) deployed in the critical sectors identified by National Critical Information Infrastructure Protection Centre (NCIIPC), Government of India should be notified under the framework of Mandatory Testing & Certification of Telecommunication Equipment (MTCTE) in a phased manner.
    1. Through these recommendations, TRAI has recommended that the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) should establish a framework for the transfer of M2M Service Provider (M2MSP) registration/ authorisation to the resultant entity in case of merger, demerger, acquisition etc. of M2MSP entities.
    1. TRAI has also recommended that DoT should introduce an enabling provision for the transfer of the ownership of M2M SIMs from one M2MSP registration holder/ authorised entity to another.
    1. The recommendations have been placed on the TRAI’s website www.trai.gov.in. For clarification/ information, if any, Shri Akhilesh Kumar Trivedi, Advisor (Network Spectrum & Licensing), TRAI, may be contacted at Telephone Number +91-11-20907758 or email at advmn@trai.gov.in.

    ***

    Samrat

    (Release ID: 2123440)

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: Acting SFST’s speech at Earth Forum 2025 (English only)

    Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

         Following is the speech by the Acting Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury, Mr Joseph Chan, at the Earth Forum 2025 today (April 22):
     
    Plato (Chairperson of Friends of the Earth (HK), Mr Plato Yip), King (Executive Director of the Financial Services Development Council (FSDC), Dr King Au), Dr Leng (Board Member of the International Sustainability Standards Board of the IFRS Foundation, Dr Bing Leng), Dr Guo (Chairman of the China Sustainable Investment Forum (China SIF), Dr Guo Peiyuan), distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen,
     
         Good afternoon. It is my great honour and pleasure to join you today at the Earth Forum 2025, a gathering of visionaries committed to shaping a sustainable future. First of all, I would like to express my gratitude to Friends of the Earth, FSDC and China SIF for organising this pivotal event and to all of you for your unwavering dedication to advancing green finance.
     
         As Asia’s leading international financial centre, Hong Kong has also become Asia’s premier hub for green and sustainable finance. To align with the target of achieving carbon neutrality by 2050, Hong Kong has made significant commitments of its own. These targets are not merely aspirational; they are driving systemic reforms across various sectors, including energy, transportation, and finance.
     
         In 2024, the total green and sustainable debts issued in Hong Kong exceeded US$84 billion, among which the volume of green and sustainable bonds arranged in Hong Kong amounted to around US$43 billion, ranking first in the Asian market for seven consecutive years since 2018 and capturing around 45 per cent of the regional total. This accomplishment solidifies our position as the region’s premier platform for scaling climate-positive investments and also underscores our dedication to fostering a robust green finance ecosystem.
     
         Hong Kong’s status as a strategic nexus for green finance in Asia is central to advancing global sustainability objectives. As of the end of December last year, there are more than 220 ESG (environmental, social and governance) funds in Hong Kong authorised by our regulator, with assets under management (AUM) of around HK$1.2 trillion. This represents a remarkable increase of 136 per cent in the number of funds and a 15 per cent rise in AUM from just three years ago. These elements will solidify Hong Kong’s role as the gateway to sustainable finance in Asia.
     
         As an international financial centre, Hong Kong is uniquely positioned to mobilise the necessary capital for climate solutions while ensuring robust integrity within our financial markets. Hong Kong’s multifaceted approach encompasses policy frameworks, market infrastructure, innovation ecosystems, and cross-border collaboration. Our Government Sustainable Bond Programme stands as a testament to this transformation. Having raised HK$220 billion since 2019, including the groundbreaking tokenised bond charge, we’re not just starting green projects but creating new benchmarks for the market in different currencies and across different tenors. The recent expansion of the programme to include sustainable projects reflects our commitment to financing a broader range of climate solutions.
     
         As we navigate the complexities of climate change and strive for a sustainable future, transparency and robust governance remain fundamental to our approach. In December 2024, we launched a roadmap on sustainability disclosure in Hong Kong. The roadmap sets out Hong Kong’s approach to require publicly accountable entities (PAEs) to adopt the ISSB Standards (International Financial Reporting Standards – Sustainability Disclosure Standards). Assuming the role of the sustainability reporting standard setter in Hong Kong, the Hong Kong Institute of Certified Public Accountants (HKICPA) published in December 2024 following a public consultation the Hong Kong Sustainability Disclosure Standards (Hong Kong Standards) fully aligned with the ISSB Standards, with an effective date of August 1, 2025. All these ensure our regulatory framework remains aligned with international best practices while addressing the specific needs of the evolving markets.
     
         Our regulatory framework is fundamental to creating a robust and dynamic sustainable finance ecosystem. By establishing clear guidelines and standards, we can ensure that all stakeholders are aligned in their efforts towards sustainability. The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) published the Hong Kong Taxonomy for Sustainable Finance in May 2024, aligns with the two mainstream taxonomies of the Mainland and the European Union (EU), and currently encompasses 12 economic activities under four sectors, namely power generation, transportation, construction, and water and waste management. It serves as a pivotal tool to raise awareness about green finance, promote common understanding of green activities, facilitate green finance flows, and provide a foundation for further applications. In its Phase 2 development, the Taxonomy will introduce transition activities and add new green activities to make it more usable and support the transition of the region.
     
         We recognise that developing green finance talent is vital for sustaining our leadership position. Our Pilot Green and Sustainable Finance Capacity Building Support Scheme has successfully approved over 6 400 applications with a total amount of reimbursement of about HK$35.8 million. As mentioned in the 2025-2026 Budget, we will extend the scheme to 2028 to continuously support local green finance talent training.
     
         Our progress reflects the Government’s commitment to not only human capital development but also technological innovation. The Green and Sustainable Fintech Proof-of-Concept Funding Support Scheme, launched by the Government in June last year, aims to nurture an advanced green fintech ecosystem by providing vital support for innovative projects. The Scheme facilitates the commercialisation of the solutions and the completion of the proof-of-concept stage, enabling wider adoption of green and sustainable fintech solutions with potential in the business landscape of Hong Kong. A total of 39 applicants involving 60 projects were approved, with a grant of HK$150,000 for each project. These initiatives are building the expertise required to sustain Hong Kong’s leadership in sustainable finance.
     
         Ladies and gentlemen, the transition to a sustainable future is both our greatest challenge and our most exciting opportunity. Hong Kong stands ready to play its part – as a financial hub, as an innovator and, most importantly, as your partner in this vital work. Looking ahead, we will leverage Hong Kong’s unique position as an international financial centre to connect capital with climate solutions. This strategic role positions Hong Kong to make significant contributions to global climate action through financial innovation.
     
         I look forward to today’s constructive dialogue and to our continued collaboration in translating these strategic initiatives into tangible outcomes that advance Hong Kong’s sustainable finance leadership. Let us work together to build a sustainable future.
     
         Thank you.

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Governor Polis, Office of Just Transition and OEDIT Announce $2 Million for New Multi-Use Events and Resiliency Center in Moffat County

    Source: US State of Colorado

    DENVER — Today, the Office of Just Transition (OJT) within the Colorado Department of Labor and Employment (CDLE) and the Office of Economic Development and International Trade (OEDIT) announced their intent to award Moffat County a $2 million Just Transition Community Funding grant to support the creation of a Multi-Use Events and Resiliency Center. The project supports Moffat County’s economic transition strategy by capitalizing on year-round fairground utilization and enhancing opportunities for expanded use, generating increased economic benefits and cultural value.

    “Colorado will continue investing in our rural communities and their economies. This new grant will drive economic development in Moffat County and I’m excited to see the impact this new facility will have in the community,” said Governor Polis.

    “The events and resiliency center should be a major catalyst to help Moffat County diversify its economy, attract new visitors to the community, and stimulate business creation and expansion,” said OJT Director Wade Buchanan. “Moffat County and the City of Craig are taking control of their economic future, and we are excited to be a part of that.”  

    The funding is part of an ongoing effort by the Polis Administration, OEDIT and OJT to support communities that have relied on coal mines and coal-fired power plants for employment to find new sources of jobs and property tax revenues. Since 2022, OJT and OEDIT have dedicated over $8 million in funding to local economic development initiatives in northwest Colorado, including 18 grants to support community-led projects ranging from business parks and entrepreneurship centers to outdoor recreation attractions and regional planning efforts.

    “The construction of an event center will support business growth in the area and increase year-round event tourism in Northwest Colorado,” said OEDIT Executive Director Eve Lieberman. “We are happy to support Moffat County’s shift toward a more diversified and resilient economic model.”

    The Multi-Use Events and Resiliency Center project is a key initiative within Moffat County’s economic diversification efforts, intended to foster new industries, conventions, and year-round event tourism. Located at the Moffat County Fairgrounds, the center will be five blocks from downtown Craig, adjacent to an Urban Renewal Authority. It will also be within walking distance of the Craig Depot station, a proposed station for Mountain Passenger Rail.

    The new facility will be designed to LEED Gold standards with geothermal and solar power systems for year-round operations, and include a 45,000-square-foot arena with seating for up to 6,000 people and 15,000 square feet of conference space. In addition to spurring broader economic growth and diversification, the project itself is expected to create 30 full-time equivalent (FTE) jobs across operations, renewable energy and hospitality while earning the county an estimated $1.2 million in sales tax revenue in its first five years.

    In northwest Colorado, Just Transition Community Funding has supported economic diversification projects across Moffat, Routt and Rio Blanco counties, including support for a pumped storage hydropower project southeast of Craig, Pioneers Medical Center, South Routt Medical Center, the Town of Rangely and the Town of Yampa among others. In addition to northwest Colorado, Just Transition Community Funding is available for Fort Morgan County, Pueblo County, the West End of Montrose and San Miguel counties, and Delta, El Paso, Gunnison, La Plata and Larimer counties.

    About the Office of Just Transition

    Colorado created the Office of Just Transition within Colorado’s Department of Labor and Employment in 2019 to assist workers and communities that will be adversely affected by the loss of jobs and revenues due to the closure of coal mines and coal-fired power plants. Its purpose is to help workers transition to new, high-quality jobs to help communities continue to thrive by expanding and attracting diverse businesses, and to replace lost revenues. To learn more about the Office of Just Transition, its action plan and the corresponding legislation, please visit cdle.colorado.gov/offices/the-office-of-just-transition.

    About the Colorado Office of Economic Development and International Trade

    The Colorado Office of Economic Development and International Trade (OEDIT) works with partners to create a positive business climate that encourages dynamic economic development and sustainable job growth. OEDIT partners with businesses and communities to offer financial, technical, and advisory assistance. From business retention services to incentives and funding, OEDIT supports economic growth across Colorado through its diverse programs and services. To learn more, visit oedit.colorado.gov.

    ###
     

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Chobani to Make $1.2 Billion Facility in Upstate New York

    Source: US State of New York

    [embedded content]

    [embedded content]

    Chobani’s latest facility will be built at the Triangle parcel located at Griffiss Business and Technology Park, which was awarded more than $23 million from FAST NY last year to complete infrastructure and transportation improvements. When at full capacity, Chobani will process over 12 million pounds of milk per day, representing a large economic opportunity for the state’s dairy farms.

    Chobani has selected Rome, New York for this project based on:

    • A skilled local workforce, including a high concentration of military veterans living in the area, as well as graduates from nearby colleges
    • Easy access to the major population of the East Coast
    • Availability of affordable housing in the area as well as Governor Hochul’s ongoing commitment to building affordable homes in New York State
    • Additional resources coming from the state to support the creation of new jobs

    Empire State Development President, CEO and Commissioner Hope Knight said, “Today’s announcement represents how New York is building a stronger, more sustainable economy that creates jobs, promotes tradable industries and supports additional economic sectors in the state. This public-private partnership with Chobani will grow the market for New York’s dairy farmers, create jobs that provide a path to the middle class, and develop even more world-class food products that are widely recognized across North America. Under Governor Hochul’s leadership, the State continues to invest in the companies and jobs that bolster New York’s economic vitality of today and tomorrow.”

    New York State Agriculture Commissioner Richard A. Ball said, “Twenty years ago, Chobani opened its first U.S. facility right here in New York, so we’re thrilled with their decision to expand their roots here with a brand-new manufacturing facility in the Mohawk Valley. This is tremendous news for our state and for our dairy farmers, who will be supplying milk to this state-of-the-art processing facility. Chobani has long been a part of New York’s world-class dairy industry, and this feels like a real full-circle moment to welcome them to another region in our state. I thank Governor Hochul and all of the partners involved and look forward to the positive long-term impact this will have on our dairy community statewide.”

    New York State Department of Labor Commissioner Roberta Reardon said, “New York’s dairy industry is essential to the success of our state’s economy, putting food on the table for families statewide and providing countless pathways to good-paying careers. Governor Hochul has made strengthening New York’s agricultural workforce a top priority and the results speak for themselves. Chobani’s massive investment in the Mohawk Valley will continue to expand our state’s impressive, and delicious, dairy offerings and bring career opportunities to so many New Yorkers, including those in underserved populations.”

    To help facilitate the company’s investment and expansion in the Mohawk Valley, Empire State Development (ESD) has agreed to provide Chobani up to $73 million in performance-based Excelsior Jobs Program tax credits to support the creation of more than 1,000 jobs at the Rome location. Additionally, the company has pledged to collaborate with ESD to develop workforce training that aims to train and provide job opportunities at Chobani to underserved populations.

    The dairy industry is the largest single segment of New York’s $8 billion agricultural industry. The state has nearly 3,000 dairy farms that produce 16.1 billion pounds of milk annually, making New York the fifth largest dairy state in the United States. New York is the largest producer of yogurt, sour cream, cream cheese and cottage cheese and the fifth largest producer of milk. The dairy community in New York includes both large dairy operations and small, family run farms. It also boasts approximately 200 dairy processing facilities of various types and sizes, from major global processing companies to small artisanal dairy product makers.

    Chobani has been a major employer in the Mohawk Valley for decades, and this massive new $1.2 billion investment will bring more than 1,000 good-paying jobs to Oneida County.”

    Governor Kathy Hochul

    U.S. Senator Charles Schumer said, “Today, Chobani makes Upstate New York the No. 1 Greek yogurt producer in America. Chobani’s $1 billion investment — the largest investment in natural food making in American history — is a win-win-win for Chobani, NY dairy farmers, and the Mohawk Valley economy and jobs. I’ve fought to help Chobani grow since the very beginning to lay the foundation for a day like today. When Chobani wanted to expand the reach of their delicious and nutritious Greek yogurt, I helped get them included in the national school lunch program to be enjoyed by children across the country. With this new factory, more people will be able to enjoy their ‘Made In NY’ Greek yogurt than ever before. Dairy farmers are the beating heart of Upstate NY and this massive new facility and 1,000 new jobs will help support so many family farms across the state. I sincerely thank Chobani’s amazing CEO, and my very good friend, Hamdi Ulukaya for continuing his commitment to our state. I also thank Governor Hochul: without her leadership, today would not be possible. New York is proud that Chobani calls it home and more people will be enjoying their yogurt that comes from NY dairy farms made here in the Mohawk Valley than ever before.”

    Representative John Mannion said, “This transformational investment by Chobani is a major win for New York State, and its success is a top priority for the Mohawk Valley. Residents of NY-22 will help fill the 1,000 new jobs and increased demand will benefit local dairy farmers and strengthen their bottom lines. I was proud to support FAST NY in the State Senate, working with Governor Hochul to drive economic growth and create good paying jobs for New Yorkers. I’m grateful for the Governor’s leadership and for Chobani’s continued commitment to New York agriculture, our workers, and our communities.”

    State Senator Joseph Griffo said, “I thank Chobani for their willingness to continue to invest in Upstate New York and appreciate the efforts of all those who have helped make today’s announcement a reality, especially Oneida County Executive Anthony Picente Jr. and the Governor and Empire State Development. This major expansion will generate new employment opportunities, boost the local and regional economies, strengthen the state’s dairy industry and enhance the City of Rome, Oneida County and Upstate New York. I am looking forward to watching as this project progresses and am excited about the significant, positive, transformational impact it will potentially have on the community, region and state.”

    Assemblymember Marianne Buttenchon said, “I welcome Chobani to my district and look forward to a great partnership. Chobani is an amazing employer that provides healthy, delicious products for our families. They also always support our local communities by helping those in need. I sincerely thank Chobani for choosing Oneida County and for all they do for New York State.”

    Oneida County Executive Anthony Picente said, “This is a generational win for Oneida County and the entire Mohawk Valley. We believed in the potential of the Griffiss Triangle site and invested over $6 million to make it shovel-ready because we knew it could attract a world-class partner like Chobani. I’m proud of the role Oneida County played in bringing this transformative project to fruition. This $1 billion investment will create over 1,000 good-paying jobs, boost our local economy, and reaffirm our region as a hub for innovation and opportunity. We couldn’t be happier to welcome Chobani to Rome and begin this new chapter together.”

    Rome Mayor Jeffrey Lanigan said, “We are incredibly grateful to Governor Hochul and the State of New York for their continued support of Chobani’s tremendous project here in the City of Rome. This transformative investment marks a major step forward for our community, bringing new jobs, opportunities, innovation, and growth. The redevelopment of the Triangle Site was a visionary effort — one that required forward-thinking investments, long-term commitment and dedication. We are very proud to be a part of this exciting new chapter for Rome.”

    Embedded Flickr Album

    Governor Hochul’s Ongoing Support for the Agricultural Industry
    Today’s expansion of Chobani in Rome complements Governor Hochul’s commitment to the agriculture industry in New York State. Governor Hochul has made record investments to support the state’s farmers. Initiatives such as Nourish NY and the 30 percent Initiative have connected locally grown food with underserved communities while boosting the agricultural economy. Governor Hochul has invested $55 million to help dairy farms adopt sustainable practices and modernize operations and protected and enhanced the state’s farming industry through an $82 million investment in agricultural stewardship programs.

    In her most recent State of the State, Governor Hochul has continued to build on these efforts and has proposed additional investment in agricultural stewardship programs and will provide additional funding to research and implement climate-resilient practices on dairy farms. Additionally, the Governor has proposed the expansion of agriculture education in New York’s schools. More information on the Governor’s 2025 State of the State proposals for New York’s agriculture industry.

    About Chobani
    Chobani is a food maker with a mission of making high-quality and nutritious food accessible to more people, while elevating our communities and making the world a healthier place. In short: making good food for all. In support of this mission, Chobani is a purpose-driven, people-first, food-and-wellness-focused company, and has been since its founding in 2005 by Hamdi Ulukaya, an immigrant to the U.S. The Company manufactures yogurt, oat milk and creamers — Chobani yogurt is America’s No.1 yogurt brand, made with natural ingredients without artificial preservatives. Following the 2023 acquisition of La Colombe, a leading coffee roaster with a shared commitment to quality, craftmanship and impact, the Company began selling cold-pressed espresso and lattes on tap at cafés nationwide, as well as Ready to Drink (RTD) coffee beverages at retail.

    Chobani uses food as a force for good in the world — putting humanity first in everything it does. The company’s philanthropic efforts prioritize giving back to its communities and beyond: working to eradicate child hunger, supporting immigrants, refugees and underrepresented people, honoring veterans, and protecting the planet. Chobani manufactures its products in New York, Idaho, Michigan and Australia, and its products are available throughout North America and distributed in Australia and other select markets.

    For more information, please visit www.chobani.com and www.lacolombe.com, or follow us on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and LinkedIn.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: On Earth Day, $60 Million for Green Resiliency Grants

    Source: US State of New York

    overnor Kathy Hochul today announced $60 million in Environmental Bond Act funding for the next round of Green Resiliency Grants. The program supports vital stormwater management and resilient infrastructure projects in flood-prone communities across New York State. This action advances Governor Hochul’s comprehensive clean water and resiliency agenda to protect New Yorkers from extreme weather, while making these projects more affordable to minimize the financial impact on local ratepayers.

    “On Earth Day, we’re reminded that New Yorkers are on the front lines of increasingly dangerous and frequent extreme weather events,” Governor Hochul said. “This investment helps prepare and protect our homes, neighborhoods and families when disaster strikes — all while creating more good-paying jobs. This is how we fight for the future New Yorkers deserve.”

    The $4.2 billion Clean Water, Clean Air, and Green Jobs Environmental Bond Act of 2022 continues to deliver historic investments to safeguard water quality, reduce pollution, strengthen resiliency and create green jobs.

    Governor Hochul launched the Green Resiliency Grant program in 2024, awarding $60 million to 13 transformational projects across the State in the inaugural round. Building on the success of the 2024 program, the second round will prioritize projects offering significant risk reduction, helping communities build storm-ready infrastructure that provides long-term solutions and stability.

    Green infrastructure projects provide benefits such as:

    • Safer, more resilient communities by managing stormwater to mitigate flooding and better protect our homes and businesses.
    • Cleaner water and air by reducing and treating stormwater at the source.
    • Cooler cities by reducing urban heat island effect to create a more comfortable environment.
    • Thriving ecosystems by restoring habitats to bring nature back to communities.
    • Vibrant communities by encouraging economic development, revitalizing neighborhoods and enhancing recreational opportunities.

    The New York State Environmental Facilities Corporation will open the grant round on May 1. Applications, guidance, and webinar information will be available on EFC’s website. Any community that needs help with its project is encouraged to reach out to EFC’s Community Assistance Teams.

    New York State Environmental Facilities Corporation President & CEO Maureen A. Coleman said, “Families shouldn’t have to live with the fear of flooding every time it rains. With Governor Hochul’s support through the Green Resiliency Grant program, we’re giving communities the tools they need to build safer neighborhoods, cleaner waterways, and a stronger local economy. These investments don’t just build vital resilient infrastructure—they protect New Yorkers, restore peace of mind, and create jobs. This is resilience in action.”

    New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Acting Commissioner Amanda Lefton said, “The Green Resiliency Grant program is another example of how the historic Clean Air, Clean Water and Green Jobs Environmental Bond Act and Governor Hochul are making sustained and generational investments to protect and strengthen New York’s flood-prone communities. The $60 million grants announced today will provide significant support for local governments to implement transformative green infrastructure projects that will help make their communities more resilient to extreme weather caused by climate change across New York State.”

    State Senator Pete Harckham said, “These new climate resiliency grants announced by Governor Hochul will allow local municipalities across the state to identify climate-smart projects that will ensure the health and safety of our residents. The partnership of the governor and state legislature in building more resilient communities shows the need to address the impacts of the climate crisis head-on while also creating good green jobs and protecting the environment.”

    Assemblymember Deborah J. Glick said, “As climate change continues to intensify extreme weather patterns, we must make investments statewide to prepare for this new reality. Not only will this essential funding help protect our communities’ homes and infrastructure but will also help to mitigate the discharge of untreated stormwater into our waterways. I look forward to seeing these grants make a difference around the state.”

    New York’s Commitment to Water Quality
    New York State continues to increase its nation-leading investments in water infrastructure, including more than $2.2 billion in financial assistance from EFC for local water infrastructure projects in State Fiscal Year 2024 alone. With an additional $500 million proposed for clean water infrastructure in Governor Hochul’s FY26 Executive Budget, New York will have invested a record $6 billion in water infrastructure since 2017.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: EIB supports innovative climate action in emerging markets alongside private equity firm LeapFrog Investments

    Source: European Investment Bank

    EIB

    • EIB Global commits $60 million to Climate Investment Strategy of LeapFrog Investments alongside World Bank Group’s International Finance Corporation on margins of Spring Meetings in Washington.
    • LeapFrog aims to deploy $500 million for green technologies in Africa and Asia.
    • Other partners include the World Bank Group’s International Finance Corporation, Singaporean investment firm Temasek and the Swiss Development Finance Institution

    The European Investment Bank is accelerating the use of green technologies in Africa and Asia with a $60 million pledge for private equity firm LeapFrog Investments (LeapFrog). The pledge by the EIB, financial arm of the European Union,  is for a LeapFrog Climate Investment Strategy that has also drawn support from the World Bank Group’s International Finance Corporation (IFC), Singapore headquartered global investment companyTemasek and the Swiss Development Finance Institution (SIFEM).

    LeapFrog aims to deploy $500 million under its Climate Investment Strategy to scale green tools and technologies for consumers in Africa and Asia. Millions of people are expected to have access to better and greener transport, energy, food and housing as a result of the initiative.

    EIB Group President Nadia Calviño said: “Today’s announcement is an example of public-private partnership at its best, and a strong statement on Europe’s climate leadership. At the EIB, we are staying the course and consolidating our role as The Climate Bank.”

    Consumers in South Asia, Southeast Asia and Africa account for 25% of global emissions of greenhouse gases, a figure set to rise to as much as 73% by 2030 without a green transition. Directing capital in these markets to actions that counter climate change is key to fostering long-term and sustainable economic growth.

    An initial investment under LeapFrog’s Climate Investment Strategy supports Battery Smart, India’s largest battery-as-a-service provider for two and three wheelers, providing riders with low-carbon mobility. Other sectors of interest include rooftop solar and clean cooking.

     “The world’s four billion  consumers in emerging markets constitute half of humanity – they have every right to rise but, without green tools and technologies, their total emissions will blow through the world’s carbon budget. This is also where the greatest opportunities lie — investing to support  a generational  transition for the majority of global consumers and producers. We are grateful to have the support of our longstanding partners EIB, IFC and Temasek in achieving this mission,” said Dr Andy Kuper, CEO and Founder of LeapFrog Investments.

    LeapFrog’s Climate Investment Strategy was recognised today at the World Bank Group and International Monetary Fund Spring Meetings by the heads of the EIB Group, LeapFrog and by IFC Vice-President of Industries Mohammed Gouled and Temasek CEO Dilhan Pillay.

    Background information

    About the European Investment Bank Group:

    The European Investment Bank (ElB) is the long-term lending institution of the European Union, owned by its Member States. Built around eight core priorities, we finance investments that contribute to EU policy objectives by bolstering climate action and the environment, digitalisation and technological innovation, security and defence, cohesion, agriculture and bioeconomy, social infrastructure, the capital markets union, and a stronger Europe in a more peaceful and prosperous world. 

    All projects financed by the EIB Group are in line with the Paris Climate Agreement, as pledged in our Climate Bank Roadmap. Almost 60% of the EIB Group’s annual financing supports projects directly contributing to climate change mitigation, adaptation, and a healthier environment.   

    EIB Global is the EIB Group’s specialised arm devoted to increasing the impact of international partnerships and development finance, and a key partner of Global Gateway. We aim to support €100 billion of investment by the end of 2027 – around one-third of the overall target of this EU initiative. Within Team Europe, EIB Global fosters strong, focused partnerships alongside fellow development finance institutions and civil society. EIB Global brings the EIB Group closer to people, companies and institutions through our offices across the world. High-quality, up-to-date photos of our headquarters for media use are available here. 

    About LeapFrog Investments

    LeapFrog invests in healthcare, financial services and climate solutions businesses in high-growth global markets. Its companies deliver distinctive impact and robust returns, growing revenues on average 23% a year. LeapFrog companies now reach 537 million people with essential services in 37 countries. The firm has raised billions of dollars from global institutional investors, including a $500m commitment by Temasek to LeapFrog and its growth equity funds. LeapFrog has twice been ranked by Fortune as one of the top Companies to Change the World, alongside Apple and Novartis, and was named inaugural Pioneer in Impact by the FT and IFC at the Transformational Business Awards.

    For more information, go to: www.leapfroginvest.com.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Ordinary people’s insurance funds and investments plundered for the needs of the EU’s war industry – E-001513/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001513/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Kostas Papadakis (NI), Lefteris Nikolaou-Alavanos (NI)

    The question of who will be called upon to pay the EUR 800 billion for ReArm Europe has been answered through the formation of the ‘Savings and Investment Union’. Guided by the ‘Letta Report’ and the protocols of the EU’s war economy, a direction is being given to seize the EUR 33 trillion of private savings in the EU ‘to cover the strategic needs of the EU’, as well as the more than EUR 10 trillion in so-called low-yield deposit accounts, with an ‘emphasis on the supplementary pensions sector’.

    The Commission also announced ‘a review of existing EU pension legislation to increase participation in supplementary pensions’, i.e. the regulation introducing the ‘Pan-European Personal Pension Product’ and the related ‘IORP Directive’. The EU is also considering compulsory registration in capitalised pension funds, as is already the case in Greece, for example, with the Hellenic Auxiliary Pensions Defined Contributions Fund (TEKA), which siphons off contributions from insured persons.

    In view of the above:

    • 1.What is the Commission’s position on the fact that, with the activation of the so-called EU ‘Savings and Investment Union’, the reserves of insurance funds and the deposits of working households are being sequestered and plundered, and the lifetime efforts of working people are being raided for the needs of the war industry?
    • 2.What is the Commission’s position on the fair demands of pensioners in Greece for the immediate return of all retroactive payments, based on the decisions of the Council of State, to all pensioners and not just those who appealed to the courts, as well as for the return of the 13th and 14th month pensions?

    Submitted: 12.4.2025

    Last updated: 22 April 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Ensuring the sustainability of small-scale coastal fishing in the South-Eastern Mediterranean – E-001507/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001507/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Konstantinos Arvanitis (The Left), Nikolas Farantouris (The Left)

    Small-scale coastal fishing makes up the core of fishing activity in the South-Eastern Mediterranean and Greece and makes a definitive contribution to the local economy, food self-sufficiency, social cohesion, environmental protection and sustainable tourism. However, local fishers are increasingly facing problems of survival, exacerbated by the implementation of European regulations designed primarily to meet the needs of the industrial fleet in the North of the EU.

    Certain provisions of Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008, Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009, Regulation (EU) No 404/2011 and Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 on the control and oversight of fishing impose a framework that does not take into account the specific characteristics of Greek coastal fishing: a) climate change, which is leading to a significant reduction in the catch available, b) the spread of invasive alien species attacking catches, which disrupts the ecological balance, c) the increase in the cost of fuel and materials required for daily activity, d) the use of small traditional boats without advanced technological means and energy-intensive engines, e) the frequent lack of intermediary traders, f) the low technological training of fishers and the inability to comply with digital requirements.

    In view of this:

    • 1.Does the Commission intend to safeguard the viability of small-scale coastal fishing in the South-Eastern Mediterranean by introducing an income restoration system (zero deficit clause) for fishers who have suffered a significant reduction in catches?
    • 2.Is the Commission considering adapting the regulatory framework to incorporate the potential and specificities of small traditional fishing fleets in southern Europe?

    Submitted: 11.4.2025

    Last updated: 22 April 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: EIB Water Sector Fund doubles in size with support from the Netherlands

    Source: European Investment Bank

    The European Investment Bank (EIB)’s Water Sector Fund has received a significant boost from the Dutch government with a €31 million contribution, doubling the fund’s size. This substantial commitment, provided through the Dutch state-owned development financier Invest International, will bolster the EIB’s capacity to provide technical and financial support for high-impact water investments in low and lower-middle-income countries.

    The new funding will be specifically used to enhance water security in Jordan through the Aqaba-Amman Water Desalination and Conveyance project.

    The Minister of Planning and International Cooperation, Zeina Toukan, commended the Dutch government, Invest International, and EIB’s Water Sector Fund for their support of this critical project as part of the Team Europe initiative on Green Economy. “This project will provide an important source of water and contribute to enhancing economic development in Jordan.”

    “We are proud to partner with the EIB in supporting the Aqaba-Amman Water Desalination and Conveyance project through the Water Sector Fund. This investment is vital for enhancing water security in Jordan and addressing water challenges, which have been exacerbated by regional conflicts and climate change. The investment demonstrates our commitment to addressing global challenges through innovation and collaboration,” said Ms. Petra Vernooij Invest International’s Director for Public Infrastructure.

    “This significant contribution from the Netherlands underscores our shared commitment to ensuring access to safe and sustainable water resources,” said EIB Vice-President Gelsomina Vigliotti. “The Water Sector Fund plays a crucial role in mobilising finance for essential projects, and this new funding will allow us to expand our impact in Jordan.”

    The Water Sector Fund, established by the EIB and the Dutch government, targets projects in regions where public authorities have limited resources to develop adequate water infrastructure. The fund’s technical assistance and advisory services support institutional skill development, project preparation, and innovative solutions, investment grants help to decrease the total funding needs for the promoter at given investment project costs. The Water Sector Fund provides financial instruments to leverage private and public investment in water, sanitation, and hygiene projects and is open to further contributions from donors seeking to promote a greater impact in this sector.

    This new €31 million contribution represents the fourth agreement between the EIB and the Netherlands to support the Water Sector Fund.

    The contribution is earmarked for the Aqaba-Amman Water Desalination and Conveyance project, Jordan’s largest water generation scheme. This project aims to address the country’s dire water scarcity by generating 300 million cubic meters of potable water per year. The project includes the development of seawater abstraction, desalination, and water conveyance infrastructure. The fund’s contribution will be disbursed as an investment grant, blended with a sovereign loan already agreed with the EIB and project financing expected to be finalised later this year.

    The Ministry for Planning and International Cooperation of Jordan and Dutch government announced the grant support for the Aqaba-Amman Water Desalination and Conveyance Project during a signature event in Amman. The funds will be channelled through the EIB’s Water Sector Fund.

    “Making additional, non-ground water available through desalination is crucial for water security,’ said Harry Verweij, Ambassador of the Kingdom of the Netherlands to Jordan. ‘The Netherlands is proud to partner with the EIB and Jordan in the Aqaba Amman Water Desalination and Conveyor Project. This will secure future supplies of drinking water, including for vulnerable communities, and support economic growth in the country.”

    The EIB is one of the world’s largest lenders to the water sector, providing over €33 billion for water investment over the last decade. The Water Sector Fund’s innovative financial structure has helped to mobilize additional funding from other investors to share risks and accelerate project development.

    In 2023, the fund supported its first private equity fund, the Water Access Acceleration Fund. The fund is currently active in sub-Saharan Africa, with projects in developing countries around the globe also eligible.

    The EIB is expected to sign a grant agreement with the Jordanian government for this project in the coming weeks.

    Background information

    About EIB Global

    EIB Global is the EIB Group’s specialised arm dedicated to increasing the impact of international partnerships and development finance.  EIB Global is designed to foster strong, focused partnership within Team Europe, alongside fellow development finance institutions, and civil society. EIB Global brings the Group closer to local people, companies and institutions through our offices across the world

    About the Water Sector Fund

    The Water Sector Fund was developed by the EIB and the Dutch government to support water projects in low and lower-middle income countries in support of the UN’s 6th Sustainable Development Goal “Clean Water and Sanitation”. The fund provides technical assistance, advisory services, and financial instruments.

    .willis@eib.org”>r.willis@eib.org, tel.: +352 43 79 82155 / Mobile:  +352 621 55 57 58
    Website: www.eib.org/press – Press Office: press@eib.org

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Security: Walgreens Agrees to Pay up to $350 Million for Illegally Filling Unlawful Opioid Prescriptions and for Submitting False Claims to the Federal Government

    Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) State Crime Alerts (b)

    WASHINGTON – The Justice Department, together with the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (HHS-OIG), today announced a $300 million settlement with Walgreens Boots Alliance, Walgreen Co. and various subsidiaries (collectively, Walgreens) to resolve allegations that the national chain pharmacy illegally filled millions of invalid prescriptions for opioids and other controlled substances in violation of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) and then sought payment for many of those invalid prescriptions by Medicare and other federal healthcare programs in violation of the False Claims Act (FCA). The settlement amount is based on Walgreens’s ability to pay. Walgreens will owe the United States an additional $50 million if the company is sold, merged, or transferred prior to fiscal year 2032. 

    The government’s complaint, filed on Jan. 16 and amended April 18 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, alleges that from approximately August 2012 through March 1, 2023, Walgreens, one of the nation’s largest pharmacy chains, knowingly filled millions of unlawful controlled substance prescriptions. These unlawful prescriptions included prescriptions for excessive quantities of opioids, opioid prescriptions filled significantly early, and prescriptions for the especially dangerous and abused combination of three drugs known as a “trinity.” Walgreens pharmacists allegedly filled these prescriptions despite clear “red flags” indicating a high likelihood that the prescriptions were invalid because they lacked a legitimate medical purpose or were not issued in the usual course of professional practice. 

    The complaint further alleges that Walgreens pressured its pharmacists to fill prescriptions quickly and without taking the time needed to confirm that each prescription was lawful. Walgreens’s compliance officials also allegedly ignored substantial evidence that its stores were dispensing unlawful prescriptions and even intentionally deprived its own pharmacists of crucial information, including by refusing to share internal data regarding prescribers with pharmacists and preventing pharmacists from warning one another about certain problematic prescribers.

    In light of Friday’s settlement, the United States has moved to dismiss its complaint. Walgreens will also move to dismiss a related declaratory judgment action filed in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.

    “Pharmacies have a legal responsibility to prescribe controlled substances in a safe and professional manner, not dispense dangerous drugs just for profit,” said Attorney General Pamela Bondi.  “This Department of Justice is committed to ending the opioid crisis and holding bad actors accountable for their failure to protect patients from addiction.”

    “This settlement holds Walgreens accountable for failing to comply with its critical responsibility to prevent the diversion of opioids and other controlled substances,” said John J. Durham, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York.  “The settlement also underscores our Office’s continued commitment to ensure that all persons and businesses that fill controlled-substance prescriptions adhere to the requirements of the Controlled Substances Act that are designed to prevent highly addictive medications from being used for illegitimate purposes.”   

    “This settlement resolves allegations that, for years, Walgreens failed to meet its obligations when dispensing dangerous opioids and other drugs,” said Deputy Assistant Attorney General Michael Granston of the Justice Department’s Civil Division. “We will continue to hold accountable those entities and individuals whose actions contributed to the opioid crisis, whether through illegal prescribing, marketing, dispensing, or distributing activities.”

    In addition to the monetary payments announced today, Walgreens has entered into agreements with DEA and HHS-OIG to address its future obligations in dispensing controlled substances. Walgreens and DEA entered into a Memorandum of Agreement that requires the company to implement and maintain certain compliance measures for the next seven years. Walgreens must maintain policies and procedures requiring pharmacists to confirm the validity of controlled substance prescriptions prior to dispensing controlled substances, provide annual training to pharmacy employees regarding their legal obligations relating to controlled substances, verify that pharmacy staffing is sufficient to enable pharmacy employees to comply with those legal obligations, and maintain a system for blocking prescriptions from prescribers whom Walgreens becomes aware are writing illegitimate controlled substance prescriptions. Walgreens has also entered into a five-year Corporate Integrity Agreement with HHS-OIG, which further requires Walgreens to establish and maintain a compliance program that includes written policies and procedures, training, board oversight, and periodic reporting to HHS-OIG related to Walgreens’s dispensing of controlled substances. 

    The civil settlement resolves four cases brought under the qui tam, or whistleblower, provisions of the FCA by former Walgreens employees. The FCA authorizes whistleblowers to sue on behalf of the United States and receive a share of any recovery.  It also permits the United States to intervene and take over such lawsuits, as it did here. The relators will receive a 17.25% share of the government’s FCA recovery in this matter.

    The claims asserted against defendants are allegations only and there has been no determination of liability.

    The United States’ pursuit of this matter underscores the government’s commitment to combating health care fraud. One of the most powerful tools in this effort is the False Claims Act.  Tips and complaints from all sources about potential fraud, waste, abuse, and mismanagement can be reported to HHS, at 800-HHS-TIPS (800-447-8477).

    The United States is represented in this matter by attorneys from the Justice Department’s Civil Division Consumer Protection Branch (Assistant Director Amy DeLine and Trial Attorney Nicole Frazer) and Commercial Litigation Branch, Fraud Section (Assistant Director Natalie Waites and Trial Attorney Joshua Barron), as well as from the U.S. Attorneys’ Offices for the Northern District of Illinois (Assistant U.S. Attorney Valerie R. Raedy), Middle District of Florida (Chief of the Civil Division Randy Harwell and Assistant U.S. Attorney Carolyn Tapie), District of Maryland (Chief of the Civil Division Thomas Corcoran), Eastern District of New York (Assistant U.S. Attorney Elliot M. Schachner) and Eastern District of Virginia (Assistant U.S. Attorney John Beerbower). Fraud Section senior financial analyst Karen Sharp provided support for the matter.

    The DEA, HHS-OIG, Defense Criminal Investigative Service, Defense Health Agency (DHA), Office of Personnel Management (OPM), Department of Labor (DOL) Office of Inspector General, Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), Office of Inspector General, FBI Chicago Field Office, and the U.S. Attorneys’ Offices for the District of Colorado, Southern District of California, Eastern District of California, Northern District of California, Eastern District of Washington, Southern District of Alabama, Southern District of Illinois, Central District of Illinois, District of Arizona, Western District of Texas, Northern District of Texas, District of Puerto Rico, and Eastern District of Louisiana provided substantial assistance in the investigation.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI: TMD Energy Limited Announces Closing of Initial Public Offering

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    KUALA LUMPUR, MALAYSIA, April 22, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — TMD Energy Limited (the “Company”) (NYSE American: TMDE), together with its subsidiaries is a Malaysia and Singapore based services provider engaged in integrated bunkering services which involves ship-to-ship transfer of marine fuels, ship management services and vessel chartering services, today announced the closing of its previously announced initial public offering of 3,100,000 ordinary shares, par value US$0.0001 per share (the “Shares”) at a public offering price of US$3.25 per share to the public (the “Offering”), for a total of approximately US$10.08 million gross proceeds to the Company, before deducting underwriting discounts and offering expenses. The Shares began trading on the NYSE American on April 21, 2025, under the symbol “TMDE”.

    In addition, the Company has granted the underwriters an option, exercisable within 45 days from the closing date of the Offering, to purchase up to an additional 465,000 Shares at the public offering price, less underwriting discounts, to cover the over-allotment option, if any.

    The Company intends to use the net proceeds from the Offering for (i) the purchase of cargo oil; (ii) defraying listing expenses; and (iii) working capital and other general corporate purposes.

    Maxim Group LLC (“Maxim”) acted as sole book-running manager of the Offering. Loeb & Loeb LLP acted as legal counsel to the Company, and Pryor Cashman LLP acted as legal counsel to Maxim Group LLC in connection with the Offering.

    A registration statement on Form F-1, as amended (File No.: 333-283704) relating to the Offering was initially filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on December 10, 2024 and was declared effective by the SEC on March 31, 2025. The Offering is being made only by means of a prospectus, forming a part of the registration statement. Copies of the final prospectus relating to the Offering may be obtained from Maxim Group LLC, 300 Park Avenue, 16th Floor, New York, NY 10022, United States of America or by email at syndicate@maximgrp.com. In addition, a copy of the prospectus relating to the Offering may be obtained via the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

    This press release does not constitute an offer to sell, or the solicitation of an offer to buy any of the Company’s securities, nor shall such securities be offered or sold in the United States absent registration or an applicable exemption from registration, nor shall there be any offer, solicitation, or sale of any of the Company’s securities in any state or jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation, or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of such state or jurisdiction.

    About TMD Energy Limited

    TMD Energy Limited and its subsidiaries (“TMDEL Group”) are principally involved in marine fuel bunkering services specializing in the supply and marketing of marine gas oil and marine fuel oil of which include high sulfur fuel oil, low sulfur fuel oil and very low sulfur fuel oil, to ships and vessels at sea. TMDEL Group is also involved in the provision of ship management services for in-house and external vessels, as well as vessel chartering. As of today, TMDEL Group operates in 19 ports across Malaysia with a fleet of 15 bunkering vessels. For more information, please visit the Company’s website at: www.tmdel.com.

    Forward-Looking Statements

    Certain statements in this announcement are forward-looking statements, including but not limited to, the Company’s Offering. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties and are based on the Company’s current expectations and projections about future events that the Company believes may affect its financial condition, results of operations, business strategy and financial needs, including the expectation that the Offering will be successfully completed. Investors can identify these forward-looking statements by words or phrases such as “may”, “could”, “will”, “should”, “would”, “expect”, “plan”, “intend”, “anticipate”, “believe”, “estimate”, “predict”, “potential”, “project” or “continue” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. The Company undertakes no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent occurring events or circumstances, or changes in its expectations, except as may be required by law. Although the Company believes that the expectations expressed in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, it cannot assure you that such expectations will turn out to be correct, and the Company cautions investors that actual results may differ materially from the anticipated results and encourages investors to review other factors that may affect its future results in the Company’s registration statement and other filings with the SEC.

    For investor and media inquiries, please contact:

    TMD Energy Limited
    Email: corporate@tmdel.com

    WFS Investor Relations
    Email : services@wealthfsllc.com

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: Incorta Introduces Intelligent Accounts Payable Agent for Google Cloud’s Agentspace, Supports New A2A Protocol for Cross-Agent Collaboration

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    FOSTER CITY, Calif., April 22, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Incorta, the pioneering open data delivery platform, was featured in Google Next’s keynote, where it announced the launch of the Incorta AP Agent, an AI-powered solution that transforms accounts payable workflows with real-time operational insights and automation. Built for Google Cloud’s Agentspace, the Incorta AP Agent marks a major leap forward in finance modernization—combining natural language querying, ERP data integration, and intelligent automation to dramatically enhance control, compliance, and efficiency for enterprise AP teams.

    At the same time, Incorta is proud to be an early partner supporting Google Cloud’s newly introduced Agent-to-Agent (A2A) protocol, a first-of-its-kind open standard that enables AI agents to securely collaborate across enterprise systems and vendors.

    “Businesses today don’t just need better data, they need the ability to act on that data instantly,” said Osama Elkady, CEO and co-founder of Incorta. “With the AP Agent and support for A2A, we’re helping customers unlock the full potential of agentic AI, moving beyond dashboards into a future where enterprise workflows are truly intelligent, connected, and automated.”

    Meet the Incorta AP Agent: Smarter Finance Starts Here

    The Incorta AP Agent eliminates bottlenecks from fragmented systems and manual invoice processing by delivering direct access to ERP data through conversational AI. Finance teams can now detect errors instantly, automate compliance actions, and reclaim time for strategic initiatives.

    Key Benefits:

    • Real-Time Error Detection
      Identifies pricing discrepancies instantly using AI and ERP data.
    • Conversational Data Access
      Enables natural language queries without technical skills.
    • Enhanced Financial Control
      Automatically places invoice holds to enforce contract compliance.
    • Increased Operational Efficiency
      Frees AP teams from repetitive tasks, shifting focus to strategic initiatives.

    Under the hood, the Incorta AP Agent leverages Incorta’s Direct Data Mapping®, ensuring secure, source-identical data is always accessible, always current, and always analytics-ready.

    Scaling Intelligence Across the Enterprise with A2A

    To support broader enterprise automation, Incorta is also among the first partners backing Agent2Agent (A2A)—a new open protocol from Google Cloud that enables AI agents to securely communicate, coordinate, and collaborate, regardless of vendor or platform.

    A2A represents a shared industry vision for interoperable AI. By allowing agents to dynamically discover capabilities, share context, and delegate tasks, the protocol accelerates complex, multi-agent enterprise workflows.

    “Incorta is excited to support A2A and advance agent communication for customers, making the future of enterprise automation smarter, faster, and truly data-driven,” added Elkady.

    The combination of Incorta’s intelligent agents and A2A’s interoperability empowers customers to orchestrate smarter decision-making and automation across functions, starting with AP and expanding to procurement, finance, supply chain, and beyond.

    About Incorta

    Incorta is the first and only open data delivery platform that enables real-time analysis of live, detailed data across all systems of record—without the need for complex ETL processes. By enabling direct analysis on raw, source-identical data, Incorta provides faster, more accurate insights while removing barriers to exploration. With intuitive low-code/no-code tools, AI-powered querying through Nexus, and prebuilt business data applications, enterprise teams can quickly surface insights, break down technical roadblocks, and make smarter decisions without heavy engineering effort. For more information, please visit www.incorta.com.

    Media Relations Contact:

    Elizabeth Byington
    incorta@sparkpr.com 

    The MIL Network