Category: Economy

  • MIL-OSI Australia: $27 million for safer, smoother Ridgley Highway

    Source: Workplace Gender Equality Agency

    The Albanese Labor Government is building Australia’s future, investing in the transport infrastructure Tasmanians need to support a growing state. 

    We’re investing $27.2 million to deliver upgrades along the Ridgley Highway, making it safer and smoother for truckies and other road users. 

    The project will better accommodate larger heavy vehicles along this important freight route, supporting the state’s economy. 

    The Ridgley Highway is a key transport link between the north-west and west coast region, connecting Burnie and the Murchison Highway, which is vital for mining, forestry and tourism in the western portion of the state.

    Upgrades will prioritise safety improvements and works may include intersection improvements, passing lanes, lane and shoulder widening, heavy vehicle driver rest areas, and active and public transport improvements. 

    This investment adds to the Australian Government’s $80 million commitment to the Freight Capacity Upgrade Program, which has already begun delivering funding to strengthen and rehabilitate a number of sections of pavement along the Ridgley Highway.

    Delivery is expected to commence in late 2027 with an estimated completion date of mid-2030. 

    Quotes attributable to Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Local Government Minister Catherine King:

    “The Australian Government is committed to delivering nationally significant infrastructure projects that increase productivity and resilience, improve liveability and enhance sustainability.

    “These new projects will provide a safe, efficient, reliable, and consistent road environment for Tasmanians and its visitors. 

    “We will continue to work in partnership with the Tasmanian Government to deliver these vital works.” 

    Quotes attributable to Senator for Tasmania Anne Urquhart:  

    “Residents in the North West and West Coast often travel long distances for work, and to visit family and loved ones.  Our industries and economy also rely on road transport, and every road user should be able to travel safely, whatever the reason for their journey.

    “The Federal Labor Government knows the importance of investment in roads and infrastructure, especially in regions like ours.  I know that road users who travel on the Ridgley Highway will welcome this announcement and I look forward to seeing the work commence.”

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI Africa: Secretary-General’s message on World Meteorological Day [scroll down for French version]

    Source: United Nations – English

    he dark predictions of meteorologists are coming to pass. Our climate is going up in flames. Every one of the last ten years has been the hottest in recorded history. Ocean heat is breaking records. And every country is feeling the effects – whether scorched by fires, swept by floods, or pummelled by unprecedented storms.
     
    The theme of this year’s World Meteorological Day – Closing the Early Warning Gap Together – reminds us that, in this new climate reality, early warning systems are not luxuries. They are necessities and sound investments – providing an almost ten-fold return. Yet, almost half the world’s countries still lack access to these life-saving systems. It is disgraceful that, in a digital age, lives and livelihoods are being lost because people have no access to effective early warning systems.

    The United Nations Early Warnings for All initiative aims for everyone, everywhere to be protected by an alert system by 2027. The world must come together, and urgently scale-up action and investment, to realize this goal.

    We need high-level political support for the Initiative within countries, a boost in technology support, greater collaboration between governments, businesses and communities, and a major effort to scale-up finance. Increasing the lending capacity of the Multilateral Development Banks is key. The Pact for the Future agreed last year made important strides forward, it must be delivered in full. So must the COP29 finance outcome.

    At the same time, we must intensify our efforts to tackle the climate crisis at source – through rapid and deep cuts to greenhouse gas emissions – to prevent it getting unimaginably worse. This year all countries must honour the promise to deliver new national climate action plans that align with limiting global temperature rise to 1.5 degrees Celsius.

    In an era of climate disaster, every person on Earth must be protected by an early warning system as a matter of justice. Together, let’s deliver. 

    ***

    Les sombres prévisions des météorologues sont en passe de se réaliser. Notre climat s’embrase. Les dix dernières années ont été les plus chaudes jamais enregistrées dans l’histoire de l’humanité. Les océans connaissent des niveaux record de chaleur. Incendies ravageurs, inondations dévastatrices ou tempêtes sans précédent : aucun pays n’est épargné par les effets des changements climatiques.

    Cette année, la Journée météorologique mondiale est placée sous le thème « Combler ensemble les lacunes en matière d’alertes précoces », qui vient nous rappeler que, dans cette nouvelle réalité climatique, les systèmes d’alerte précoce ne sont pas un luxe. En plus d’être indispensables, ils représentent des investissements judicieux, puisque les bénéfices qui en découlent sont pratiquement dix fois supérieurs aux montants investis. Pourtant, près de la moitié des pays de la planète n’ont toujours pas accès à ces systèmes d’une importance vitale. À l’ère du numérique, il est déplorable que des personnes perdent la vie ou voient leurs moyens de subsistance anéantis faute d’avoir accès à des systèmes d’alerte précoce efficaces.

    L’initiative « Alertes précoces pour tous » de l’Organisation des Nations Unies vise à ce que chaque habitant de la planète soit protégé par un système d’alerte d’ici à 2027. La communauté internationale doit unir ses forces et accroître d’urgence ses efforts et ses investissements pour atteindre cet objectif.

    Il est primordial que chaque pays accorde à l’initiative un soutien politique de haut niveau, qu’un appui plus énergique soit offert sur le plan des technologies, que les gouvernements, les entreprises et les communautés resserrent leur coopération et que les financements connaissent un véritable bond. Il est également crucial d’accroître la capacité de prêt des banques multilatérales de développement. Le Pacte pour l’avenir, adopté l’an dernier, a permis de poser des bases solides ; il doit maintenant être appliqué pleinement. Il faut également concrétiser les engagements pris en matière de financement à la vingt-neuvième session de la Conférence des Parties à la Convention-cadre des Nations Unies sur les changements climatiques (COP 29).

    Dans le même temps, il nous faut redoubler d’efforts pour chercher à résoudre la crise climatique à la source, en réduisant rapidement et fortement les émissions de gaz à effet de serre, afin d’éviter que la situation n’empire dans des proportions inimaginables. Cette année, tous les pays doivent honorer leur promesse de présenter de nouveaux plans d’action nationaux pour le climat qui soient compatibles avec l’objectif consistant à limiter le réchauffement planétaire à 1,5 degré Celsius.

    À l’ère des catastrophes climatiques, il faut que chaque personne sur Terre soit protégée par un système d’alerte précoce ; il s’agit là d’une question de justice. Ensemble, donnons corps à cette ambition.

    ***
     

    MIL OSI Africa

  • MIL-OSI: Crypto Whales Are Watching These 3 Altcoins – Should You Buy In Too Before the Charts Reset

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    PANAMA CITY, March 23, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — LF Labs token has captured significant attention this week as whale activity drives its price up by 13.37%, with trading volume spiking to $13.33 million. This surge has fueled speculation about the token’s potential for continued growth, as it outperforms many Ethereum-based alternatives. With increasing listings on major exchanges like Gate.io and MEXC, alongside its strong performance in DeFi markets, LF Labs is quickly emerging as a top pick for investors. As the $LF token gains momentum, crypto whales are signaling that it could be the next big breakout altcoin of 2025. Investors seeking to explore next-generation altcoins should keep a close eye on LF Labs as it positions itself for even greater potential in the coming months.

    Meanwhile, Uniswap (UNI) and PancakeSwap (CAKE) continue to attract whale interest, reinforcing the growing momentum in decentralized finance (DeFi) markets.

    Uniswap (UNI) Gains Momentum as Whale Confidence Grows

    Uniswap’s platform has received substantial investment from whales which resulted in a 3900% increase in large holder netflow within a seven-day period. The market has shown an optimistic shift through heavy investor participation in UNI’s value potential at a time of general market instability. The dollar value of tokens decreases as retail traders buy into the market thus reinforcing price stability.

    UNI Large Holders Netflow. Source: IntoTheBlock

    Market participants follow UNI’s performance because its decentralized exchange features continue to retain value through changing market conditions along with rising decentralized exchange requirements. The whale-led whale purchase demonstrates market positivity and expert analysts predict a temporary price increase. Lengthy investor interest in this pattern suggests the token will surpass comparable assets when moving forward in trading sessions.

    The increase in transactions from large wallets serves as an essential sign for potential UNI price appreciation while it captures investor attention regarding decentralized finance technologies. The combination of enhanced trading volume along with depleted availability creates conditions that could draw new investor interest in UNI. Core DeFi protocol exposure has attracted investors because of UNI’s improving conditions.

    PancakeSwap (CAKE) Rises as Meme Coin Activity Grows

    Previously dormancy-based wallets that contained significant amounts of CAKE have recently increased their activity measurements on PancakeSwap. A remarkable acquisition of 101 million CAKE tokens worth more than $250 million during the last 24 hours by whales has sparked inquiries about an upcoming strong return. The market interest in the token grows because BNB Chain has demonstrated increased meme coin trading volume.

    DEX users find PancakeSwap more attractive because decentralized trading platforms experience rising popularity enabling CAKE to become a leading selection for active virtual currency traders. The activity has established a conducive market condition that suggests CAKE may recover its value in upcoming days. Analysts observe investors showing more enthusiasm since major investors actively purchased tokens.

    CAKE Supply Distribution. Source: Santiment

    Persistent accumulation could give CAKE the chance to break out of its falling trend, which would then entice retail buyers to join. The Binance ecosystem depends on the token because it provides its users with both trading flexibility and increased liquidity. According to market analysts, short-term profitability becomes possible through sustained whale purchases.

    LF Labs ($LF) Emerges as the Top Pick Among Crypto Whales

    LF Labs’ $LF token leads whale interest this week with a 13.37% daily price jump, now trading at $0.0007578. The token’s market activity reached high levels when trading volume reached $13.33 million which elevated its volume-to-market-cap ratio to 579.58%. These figures confirm crypto whale confidence in LF Labs’ future performance and fundamentals.

    Source: CoinMarketCap

    The performance of the $LF token reached 121.90% during the past week, surpassing numerous Ethereum-based tokens in the market. 3 billion tokens presently circulate under a $6.24 million market capitalization, which indicates robust development possibilities for LF Labs. A valuation analysis of $20.80 million demonstrates major potential growth because the total possible supply of tokens surpasses current circulation levels.

    Several whale investors purchase $LF due to its cheap entry point, fast trading growth, Gate.io listing, and valuable practical applications. LF Labs has also introduced tailored liquidity solutions, 24/7 support, and global partnerships with over 700 projects. LF Labs represents a partnership between Alliance DAO Crypto Fund and passes the Certik audit standard while integrating innovation and transparent practices.

    The company known as Lovely Finance transitioned to LF Labs and delivered better brand recognition through solid building blocks and strengthened alliances. The company operates as a central DeFi growth engine through its distinctive market-making strategy and solutions that enhance scalability within Web3 ecosystems. The multiple cryptocurrency exchanges where LF Labs lists enhance both accessibility and liquidity because of growing interest from traders.

    Users who wish to trade LF Labs tokens can do so through Gate.io, HTX BitMart, and MEXC platforms. The project’s mission for a data-powered Web3 integration remains strong while LF Labs advances its worldwide expansion. People looking to invest in next-generation altcoins should consider LF Labs because its prospects are unmatchable before crypto price charts restructure.

    Contact:
    John Ellen
    CEO
    support@lflabs.fund

    Disclaimer: This press release is provided by LF Labs token. The statements, views, and opinions expressed in this content are solely those of the content provider and do not necessarily reflect the views of this media platform or its publisher. We do not endorse, verify, or guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of any information presented. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial, investment, or trading advice. Investing in crypto and mining related opportunities involves significant risks, including the potential loss of capital. Readers are strongly encouraged to conduct their own research and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. However, due to the inherently speculative nature of the blockchain sector–including cryptocurrency, NFTs, and mining–complete accuracy cannot always be guaranteed. Neither the media platform nor the publisher shall be held responsible for any fraudulent activities, misrepresentations, or financial losses arising from the content of this press release. Speculate only with funds that you can afford to lose. Neither the media platform nor the publisher shall be held responsible for any fraudulent activities, misrepresentations, or financial losses arising from the content of this press release. In the event of any legal claims or charges against this article, we accept no liability or responsibility.

    Legal Disclaimer: This media platform provides the content of this article on an “as-is” basis, without any warranties or representations of any kind, express or implied. We do not assume any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information presented herein. Any concerns, complaints, or copyright issues related to this article should be directed to the content provider mentioned above.

    Photos accompanying this announcement are available at

    https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/03ce3938-ad3a-47b3-8a56-1c5076b98697

    https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/4dfbfad7-2ed4-4e24-96ba-7065487cbff5

    https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/fe1f593d-ef02-42c3-9d64-819174e1eadf

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-Evening Report: I was a music AI sceptic – until I actually used it

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Alexis Weaver, Associate Lecturer in Music Technology, University of Sydney

    Shutterstock

    With artificial intelligence programs that can now generate entire songs on demand, you’d be forgiven for thinking AI might eventually lead to the decline of human-made music.

    But AI can still be used ethically to help human musicians challenge themselves and grow their music-making abilities. I should know. As a composer and music educator, I was an AI sceptic until I started working with the technology.

    Two sides of the argument

    If you can write a text prompt, you can use AI to create a track in any genre, for almost any musical application.

    Besides generating full tracks, music AI can be used in sound analysis, noise removal, mixing and mastering, and to create entire sound palettes (such as for use in video games and podcasts). Suno, Beatoven, AIVA, Soundraw and Udio are some of the companies currently leading in the AI music space.

    In many cases, the outputs don’t have to be excellent, they just have to be good enough, and they can undercut the services of real musicians and sound designers.

    The music industry is understandably concerned. In April 2024, the US-based Artist Rights Alliance published an open letter, signed by more than 200 artists, calling for developers to stop training their AIs with copyrighted work (as this would allow companies to emulate artists’ music and image, and therefore deplete the royalties paid to artists).

    At the same time, music AI companies claim to lower the barrier to making music, such as by removing the need for physical equipment and traditional music education.

    In an interview from January, Suno’s chief executive Mikey Shulman said:

    it’s not really enjoyable to make music now. It takes a lot of time. It takes a lot of practice […] the majority of people don’t enjoy the majority of the time they spend making music.

    This is far from the message I want to send my students. However, it does unfortunately reflect the increasing pressure musicians feel to master their craft as soon as possible, in an increasingly fast-paced world that’s geared towards an intangible end goal, rather than enjoying the process of making mistakes and learning.

    From a sceptic to a reluctant advocate

    In 2023, I was commissioned by the Sydney Opera House create a new work with Sydney-based design company Kopi Su, and to develop a new generative music AI tool in the process. This tool, called Koup Music, is now in beta testing.

    I accepted the opportunity – but with quite a few hesitations, as I wasn’t really interested in working with AI. Would this be a huge waste of time, or end with my data added to some mysterious AI data pool? Or would it open up new creative directions for me?

    The tool was based on a text-to-image diffusion model called Riffusion. It takes a text prompt and generates a spectrogram, which is a visual representation of the various frequencies in an audio signal as they change through time. This is then converted to audio.

    First, I would upload my own recorded sample to the AI, and then choose a text prompt to transform it into a new five-second sample.

    For example, I could upload a short vocal melody and ask the AI to turn it into an insect, or re-contextualise it for a “hip hop” style. Sometimes the generated samples sounded very similar to my own voice (due to the vocals I uploaded).

    The following insect voice output became the subject of the musical piece below it.

    Somewhere between a voice and an insect.
    ·

    At the time of the project, the outputs could only be 5 or 10 seconds long – not long enough to make a full track. I considered this a positive, as it meant I had to incorporate the samples into my own larger work.

    Some samples were catchy. Some were funny. Others were boring. Some came out with scratchy, harsh timbres. The imperfection of it all gave me permission to have fun.

    I focused on generating separate musical elements with my text prompts, rather than fully arranged samples. A generated drum beat or melody line could be enough to inspire a completely new musical track in a style I would never have attempted otherwise.

    This output was used in the track How Things Grow.
    ·

    Sometimes, one generated sample was enough. Other times, I challenged myself to use only AI-generated sounds to create a full track. In these cases, I used techniques such as filtering and looping small snippets to tease out the sounds I wanted.

    For instance, I used the following audio samples to create the track below:

    These snippets were used in the track Boom Boom Boom.
    ·

    The process felt like a collaboration – like I was making music with a kooky colleague. This took away the pressure to make “perfect” music, and instead allowed me to focus on new creative possibilities.

    My takeaways

    I’ve concluded it’s not a bad idea to know what large music AIs are capable of. We can use them to further our own musical understanding, such as by studying how they use stylistic trends and mixing techniques, or how they translate musical ideas to suggest different genres.

    For me, the key to quashing my AI scepticism was using an AI that didn’t take over the entire working process. I remained flexible to its suggestions, while using my own knowledge to retain creative control.

    My experience isn’t isolated. Multiple studies have found that users of music AIs reported feeling satisfied with programs that allowed them to retain a sense of ownership over the composing process.

    The connecting factor across these projects was that the AI did not generate entire musical works in one go. Instead, a limited amount of musical information was generated (such as rhythms, melodies or chords), allowing the user to dictate the final result.

    The beauty in human imperfection

    Despite Shulman’s claims, the key to a meaningful relationship with music AI is to work alongside it – not to let it do all the work.

    Do I think every music student should start incorporating AI into their daily practice? No. But under the right circumstances, it can provide the tools to produce something truly creative.

    Making “imperfect” art that takes time – and hard work – is the price of being human. And I’m grateful for that.

    ·

    The author received a once-off financial commission from the Sydney Opera House to develop musical work made using the Koup Music AI, which premiered at the Sydney Opera House through a livestream broadcast on July 15th, 2023. After this initial performance the author continued to test the AI model for artistic research purposes. No funding was received to help prepare the manuscripts or research associated with this article. The author will not benefit financially from any promotion of the Koup Music tool, and has never received payment from Kopi Su.

    ref. I was a music AI sceptic – until I actually used it – https://theconversation.com/i-was-a-music-ai-sceptic-until-i-actually-used-it-252499

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-Evening Report: This week’s federal budget will focus on cost-of-living measures – and a more uncertain global economy

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By John Hawkins, Senior Lecturer, Canberra School of Politics, Economics and Society, University of Canberra

    Treasurer Jim Chalmers will bring down the federal budget on Tuesday.

    It’s likely most of the major spending initiatives have already been announced. An extra A$8.5 billion in spending on Medicare will aim to ensure nine out of ten GP visits will be bulk billed by 2030. Queensland’s Bruce Highway is to be upgraded with the Albanese Government providing $7.2 billion of the $9 billion cost.

    In a speech last week, Chalmers promised “meaningful and substantial” cost-of-living relief.

    He also stressed the global economy is more volatile and unpredictable. He said the budget bottom line would be little changed from the mid-year update released in December, when the deficit was forecast to be $26.9 billion this financial year.

    It was a comprehensive dress rehearsal for tomorrow evening’s budget speech.

    No rabbits out of the hat

    Australian budgets today are well signposted in advance in speeches such as this. That is deliberate. It is seen as a mark of responsible fiscal management to have few surprises, either positive or negative.

    In past decades, treasurers were prone to announcing surprise spending measures. No longer. The rationale for rejecting the “rabbit out of a hat” approach was spelled out by former treasurer Wayne Swan in his 2008 budget lockup press conference: he said the budget had to be “responsible”. Chalmers was Swan’s deputy chief of staff at the time.

    This means calls by economists such as Chris Richardson and Ken Henry for major tax reform are unlikely to be heeded.

    Bracket creep (increases in tax revenues as taxpayers move into higher tax brackets) will do most of the work in the very gradual windback of the budget deficit. In the mid-year budget update, it was projected to take a decade to return the budget to balance.




    Read more:
    If Treasury forecasts are right, it could be a decade before Australia is ‘back in black’


    Good luck rather than good management

    Not that a balanced or surplus budget is a sign of good budgeting. The driver of recent budget surpluses under both Labor and Coalition governments has not been government policy but stronger than expected commodity prices and exports. They have been accidental, not deliberate.

    While deficits add to debt, imposing costs on future generations, what matters is whether the debts can be paid. If the economy grows faster than the rate of debt, the situation is manageable. So we are likely to see a chart in Tuesday’s budget papers showing this, with debt gradually declining as a share of Gross Domestic Product over time.

    However, these forecasts for the bottom line do not include off-budget items such as special green energy funds or student debt write-offs that total close to $100 billion, according to Deloitte Access Economics.

    This is because the budget covers only the “general government sector” – public service departments and agencies and the defence force. It is not the whole of the public sector, which includes commercial or financial entities like government business enterprises, the Reserve Bank of Australia, and various funds.

    On Sunday, the government announced further cost-of-living relief with an extension of electricity rebates, giving households another $150 this year. This will avoid headline inflation rebounding above 3%, as the Reserve Bank is currently forecasting.

    The energy rebate last year cost the budget an estimated $3.5 billion in 2024-25. Extending it for six months will cost $1.8 billion. Chalmers has also promised another reduction in the maximum cost of prescription medicines to $25.

    In December’s budget update, the unemployment rate was forecast to be around 4½% in mid-2025 and stay around that level for the next couple of years. Given the unemployment rate was steady at 4.1% in February, that forecast may be lowered.

    Inflation was forecast to stay below 3%.

    The increasing risk of a global trade war will see some reduction in forecasts for global and Australian economic growth. The OECD has lowered its forecasts for global growth and emphasised the international outlook is highly uncertain.

    This means the Australian budget forecasts are more likely than usual to be wrong. We just don’t know in which direction they will be wrong – will they be too optimistic or pessimistic?

    What will it mean for interest rates?

    The Reserve Bank board is unlikely to feel it has enough additional information to cut interest rates again at the April 1 meeting.

    Nonetheless, the government will be constrained in how much support it can provide households. It does not want undermine its narrative of future interest rate cuts by stimulating household spending too much.

    Something to watch for will be “decisions taken but not yet announced”. These are additional initiatives the government will announce during the election campaign. They will be able to answer the “where’s the money coming from?” question by saying they are already included in the budget.

    Finally, will there be increases in defence spending? US President Donald Trump is pressing US allies to do this. Trouble is, defence spending does not address the political problem of cost-of-living pressures – if anything it adds to them.

    A potential way out is for government to support more defence spending, but only “in principle”, leaving the details for future budgets. That would help manage both domestic and international pressures.

    John Hawkins was a formerly a senior economist at the Treasury and Reserve Bank.

    Stephen Bartos does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. This week’s federal budget will focus on cost-of-living measures – and a more uncertain global economy – https://theconversation.com/this-weeks-federal-budget-will-focus-on-cost-of-living-measures-and-a-more-uncertain-global-economy-252515

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-Evening Report: Trouble at Tesla and protests against Trump’s tariffs suggest consumer boycotts are starting to bite

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Erin O’Brien, Associate Professor, School of Government and International Relations, Griffith University

    Getty Images

    When the United States starts a trade war with your country, how do you fight back? For individuals, one option is to wage a personal trade war and boycott products from the US.

    President Donald Trump has said no nation will be exempt from his tariffs, and this includes both Australia and New Zealand. His tariffs on all steel and aluminium imports, in particular, could hurt the sector in Australia, while New Zealand’s meat and wine exports to the US could also feel the effect.

    So far, political leaders have responded differently. Canada, Mexico and the European Union have imposed reciprocal tariffs on the US, while Australia has indicated it will not retaliate.

    But whether governments choose to push back or not, citizens in those and other countries are making their own stands. This includes artists such as renowned pianist András Schiff, who has cancelled his upcoming US tour.

    Most notably, collective outrage at the US president has led to a growing global boycott of Elon Musk’s Tesla due to his role in the Trump administration. Sales of new Tesla vehicles are down 72% in Australia and 76% in Germany. The share price has dropped by more than 50% since December 2024, with calls for Musk to step down as chief executive.

    Some governments are even encouraging consumer boycotts. The Canadian government, for example, has urged citizens to “fight back against the unjustified US tariffs” by purchasing Canadian products and holidaying in Canada.

    Canadians are clearly embracing this advice. Road trips to the US have dropped by more than 20% in the past month and US liquor brands have been removed from some Canadian stores altogether.

    This rise in calls for boycotts of American brands and companies is unsurprising in the Trump 2.0 era, where the lines between government and corporate America have become increasingly blurred.

    Political change by proxy

    When people want to protest a government policy, but have no political leverage because they’re not citizens of that country, boycotting corporations or brands gives them a voice. These actions are sometimes called “surrogate” or “proxy” boycotts.

    This form of “political consumerism”, where individuals align their consumption choices with their values, is now one of the most common forms of political participation in western liberal democracies.

    When France opposed the war in Iraq in 2003, US supporters of the war aimed boycotts at French imports. Consumers in the US, United Kingdom and elsewhere have boycotted Russian goods over the invasion of Ukraine, and targeted Israel over its military action and policies in Gaza and the West Bank.

    Most famously, protests against the apartheid regime in South Africa from the 1950s through to the 1990s helped isolate and eventually change its government.

    The current boycotts are not just protesting Trump’s trade war, of course. They are also about the role of unelected leaders from the corporate world, such as Musk and the heads of the Big Tech and social media companies, and their perceived self-interest and influence.

    Trump has responded angrily to consumer boycotts, calling the actions against Tesla “illegal”, which they are not. Indeed, political leaders like Trump often argue that consumer action, rather than government regulation, should be relied on to ensure corporations conform to social expectations.

    Ukrainians demonstrate in front of the Lukoil headquarters in Belgium over European imports of Russian fossil fuels, 2022.
    Getty Images

    How to wage a personal trade war

    Consumer boycotts do create change under certain conditions – typically when there is a contained problem that the targeted corporation has the power to solve.

    For example, consumer boycotts against Nestlé in the 1970s over false and dangerous marketing of powdered milk for infants led to changes in the firm’s marketing approaches. Boycotts of Nike products over sweatshop conditions for workers had a direct impact on the company’s bottom line and led to improvements.

    Things may still need to improve at Nestlé and Nike, but these boycotts show consumer pressure can catalyse corporate action. However, it is much harder – though not impossible – for boycott campaigns to succeed when the target is a government.

    Consumers boycotting American products can amplify the impact of their protest by also lobbying retailers. For example, if enough consumers stop buying a bottle of soft drink from the US, major supermarkets like Woolworths and Foodstuffs will stop buying thousands of bottles.

    There are also other ways to “vote with your wallet”. People can engage in “political investorism” by using their power as a shareholder, bank customer or pension-fund member to express their political views.

    After Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, for example, investors sought to divest from Russian companies, and superannuation funds were pressured by their members to do the same.

    As consumers and investors, individuals can wage a personal trade war, sending a clear message. Trump may not be willing to listen to the leaders of allied nations, but if consumer and investor pressure is sustained and spreads globally, he may yet hear the voice of corporate America.

    Erin O’Brien receives funding from the Australian Research Council to examine consumer and investor activism for social change. She is affiliated with the Australian Political Studies Association.

    Justine Coneybeer receives funding from the Australian Research Council to investigate ethical investment.

    ref. Trouble at Tesla and protests against Trump’s tariffs suggest consumer boycotts are starting to bite – https://theconversation.com/trouble-at-tesla-and-protests-against-trumps-tariffs-suggest-consumer-boycotts-are-starting-to-bite-252489

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-Evening Report: Despite some key milestones since 2000, Australia still has a long way to go on gender equality

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Janeen Baxter, Director, ARC Life Course Centre and ARC Kathleen Fitzpatrick Laureate Fellow, The University of Queensland

    Australia has a gender problem. Despite social, economic and political reform aimed at improving opportunities for women, gender gaps are increasing and Australia is falling behind other countries.

    The World Economic Forum currently places Australia 24th among 146 countries, down from 15th in 2006. At the current rate of change, the forum suggests it will take more than 130 years to achieve gender equality globally.

    Australia has taken important steps forward in some areas, while progress in other areas remains painfully slow. So how far have we come since 2000, and how much further do we have to go?

    The good stuff

    There are now more women in the labour market, in parliament, and leading large companies than at any other time.

    Over the past 25 years, there have been major social and political milestones that indicate progress.

    These include the appointment of Australia’s first female governor-general in 2008 and prime minister in 2010, the introduction of universal paid parental leave in 2011, a high-profile inquiry into workplace sexual harassment in 2020, and new legislation requiring the public reporting of gender pay gaps in 2023.

    Timeline of equality milestones

    • 2000

      Child Care Benefit introduced, subsidising cost of children for eligible families

    • 2008

      First female Governor-General (Dame Quentin Bryce)

    • 2010

      First female Prime Minister elected (Julia Gillard)

      First Aboriginal woman from Australia elected to UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues (Megan Davis)

      Australia’s first national paid parental leave scheme

    • 2012

      Julia Gillard misogyny speech

      Workplace Gender Equality Act becomes law, Workplace Gender Equality Agency established

    • 2013

      Dad or Partner Pay Leave commenced

    • 2016

      First Indigenous woman elected to House of Representatives (Linda Burney)

    • 2017

      Launch of Women’s Australian Football League

      #metoo movement spreads globally to draw attention to sexual harassment and assault

    • 2020

      Respect@Work National Inquiry into sexual harassment in the Australian workplace chaired by Kate Jenkins released.

    • 2021

      Grace Tame named Australian of the Year for her advocacy in sexual violence/harassment campaigns

      Independent review into Commonwealth parliamentary workplaces launched

    • 2022

      National plan to end violence against women is finalised

    • 2023

      Closing the Gender Pay Gap Bill passes parliament

    • 2024

      Superannuation on government-funded paid parental leave from July 1, 2025

      Parental leave to be increased to 26 weeks from July 2026.

    There are, however, other areas where progress is agonisingly slow.

    Violence and financial insecurity

    Women are more likely to be in casual and part-time employment than men. This is part of the reason women retire with about half the superannuation savings of men.

    This is also linked to financial insecurity later in life. Older women are among the fastest-growing groups of people experiencing homelessness.

    The situation for First Nations women is even more severe. The most recent Closing the Gap report indicates First Nations women and children are 33 times more likely to be hospitalised due to violence compared with non-Indigenous women.

    They are also seven times more likely to die from family violence.

    Improving outcomes for Indigenous women and children requires tackling the long-term effects of colonisation, removal from Country, the Stolen Generations, incarceration and intergenerational trauma. This means challenging not only gender inequality but also racism, discrimination and violence.

    At work, the latest data from the Workplace Gender Equality Agency suggests the gender pay gap is narrowing, with 56% of organisations reporting improvements.

    On average, though, the pay gap is still substantial at 21.8% with women earning only 78 cents for every $1 earned by men. This totals an average yearly shortfall of $28,425.

    There are also some notable organisations where the gender pay gap has widened.

    The burden of unpaid work

    Another measure of inequality that has proved stubbornly slow to change is women’s unequal responsibilities for unpaid domestic and care work.

    Without real change in gender divisions of time spent on unpaid housework and care, our capacity to move towards equality in pay gaps and employment is very limited.

    Australian women do more unpaid and domestic work after having children.
    Shutterstock

    Australian women undertake almost 70% of unpaid household labour. The latest Australian Bureau of Statistics time use data show that of those who participate in domestic labour, women spend an average of 4.13 hours per day on unpaid domestic and care work, compared with men’s 2.14 hours.

    This gap equates to more than a third of a full-time job. If we add up all work (domestic, care and paid), mothers have the longest working week by about 10 hours. This has changed very little over time.

    These charts, based on analyses of data from the Households, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) study, show what drives this gap.

    Women respond to increased demand for care and domestic work by doing more, while men do not. Parenthood significantly increases the time women spend on unpaid care and housework, while also reducing their time in employment.



    Men increase their time in unpaid care after a birth, but the jump is minor compared with women, and there is no change to men’s employment hours.

    Not surprisingly given these patterns, parenthood is associated with substantial declines in women’s employment hours, earnings, career progression, and mental health and wellbeing.

    The way forward

    Current policy priorities primarily incentivise women to remain in employment, while continuing to undertake a disproportionate share of unpaid family work, through moving to part-time employment or making use of other forms of workplace flexibility. This approach focuses on “fixing” women rather than on the structural roots of the problem.

    There is limited financial or cultural encouragement for men to step out of employment for care work, or reduce their hours, despite the introduction of a two-week Dad and Partner Pay scheme in 2013 and more recent changes to expand support and access.

    Fathers who wish to be more actively involved in care and family life face significant financial barriers, with current schemes only covering a basic wage. If one member of the family has to take time out or reduce their hours, it usually makes financial sense for this to be a woman, given the gender earning gap.

    The benefits of enabling men to share care work will not only be improvements for women, but will also improve family relationships and outcomes for children.

    Research shows relationship conflict declines when men do more at home. Time spent with fathers has been found to be especially beneficial for children’s cognitive development.

    Fixing the gender problem is not just about helping women. It’s good for everyone.

    Gender inequality costs the Australian economy $225 billion annually, or 12% of gross domestic product.

    Globally, the World Bank estimates gender inequality costs US$160.2 trillion. We can’t afford to slip further behind or to take more than a century to fix the problem.


    This piece is part of a series on how Australia has changed since the year 2000. You can read other pieces in the series here.

    Janeen Baxter receives funding from the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Children and Families over the Life Course (CE200100025) and an Australian Research Council Kathleen Fitzpatrick Laureate Fellowship (FL230100104).

    ref. Despite some key milestones since 2000, Australia still has a long way to go on gender equality – https://theconversation.com/despite-some-key-milestones-since-2000-australia-still-has-a-long-way-to-go-on-gender-equality-250250

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI Economics: Asian Development Bank and Canada: Fact Sheet

    Source: Asia Development Bank

    ADB is a leading multilateral development bank supporting sustainable, inclusive, and resilient growth across Asia and the Pacific. Working with its members and partners to solve complex challenges together, ADB harnesses innovative financial tools and strategic partnerships to transform lives, build quality infrastructure, and safeguard our planet.

    Founded in 1966, ADB is owned by 69 members—49 from the region.

    Headquarters

    6 ADB Avenue, Mandaluyong City 1550, Metro Manila, Philippines

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI: Vantage Drilling International Ltd. – Appointment of Director

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Dubai, March 23, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Vantage Drilling International Ltd. (the “Company“) announces the appointment of David Warwick to its board of directors. Mr. Warwick has over 15 years’ experience in investment advisory, capital markets, corporate finance, commercial, strategy, and leadership. In addition, Mr. Warwick has longstanding experience in the oil and gas and shipping sectors including a decade working with the drilling contractor Seadrill in a variety of senior commercial and finance related roles. Mr. Warwick is currently the founder and principal of Artemis Investments LLC, a Dubai based entity involved in strategic investment opportunities and capital market transactions.

    About the Company

    Vantage Drilling International Ltd., a Bermuda exempted company, is an offshore drilling contractor. Vantage Drilling’s primary business is to contract drilling units, related equipment and work crews primarily on a dayrate basis to drill oil and natural gas wells globally for major, national and independent oil and gas companies. Vantage Drilling also markets, operates and provides management services in respect of drilling units owned by others. For more information about the Company, please refer to the Company’s website, www.vantagedrilling.com  

    Attachment

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI USA: Proclamation Declares 2025 Maple Weekends in NYS

    Source: US State of New York

    overnor Kathy Hochul today issued a proclamation declaring March 22-23 and March 29-30 as New York State’s 2025 Maple Weekends. The Governor also highlighted that New York State continues to rank second in the nation in maple production, and in 2024, maple production increased to 846,000 gallons, up nearly 100,000 gallons of maple syrup from the 2023 season. Earlier today, Governor Hochul participated in New York State Maple Weekend by visiting Twin Leaf Farms in Greenfield Center, NY.

    “New York State’s maple industry is not just a tradition – it’s a thriving community of dedicated producers creating world-class maple products,” Governor Hochul said. “As we celebrate Maple Month, I encourage every New Yorker to experience the rich flavors and support the hardworking individuals behind this beloved crop.”

    Recognizing the importance of the maple industry to New York’s agricultural economy, Governor Hochul proposed additional funding in her FY26 Executive Budget to further grow the industry and help New York become the leading maple innovator. The New York State Department of Agriculture and Markets supports the maple industry through the New York State Budget — which includes funding for promotion and educational programs — as well as through investments in research projects, such as Cornell University’s Maple Program’s Arnot Teaching Forest, and through its NYS Grown & Certified and Taste NY marketing programs.

    Maple Weekends and Maple Month

    Throughout the month of March each year and the last two weekends of the month in particular, maple farms across the state open their doors to the public to provide a chance to taste pure maple syrup, right from the source, and experience the unique family tradition of making maple syrup in New York State. Producers offer tours and pancake breakfasts, sell maple products, and demonstrate the syrup-making process, which includes the traditional system of hanging buckets on trees or more modern methods of production using vacuum systems to increase the yield of sap per tree. A searchable list of Maple Weekend events is available at mapleweekend.nysmaple.com.

    Maple Promotions

    New York’s Taste NY Markets across the state are highlighting unique local maple products and producers during the month of March, with product specials, giveaways, and more. The Western NY Welcome Center is offering a maple gift basket giveaway and a maple product scavenger hunt, with visitors getting 10 percent off the maple products they find in store. The Capital Region Welcome Center will have a sampling event on March 28, featuring pancakes by Phoenicia Diner and Jourdin’s Maple Syrup. Additionally, the Mohawk Valley Welcome Center is doing a gift basket giveaway, and the Adirondacks Welcome Center will feature educational displays from the Upper Hudson Valley Maple Association with information about the history of maple production and modern production techniques. Visit your local Taste NY Market to take part in their Maple Month celebrations! Find a market in your region.

    Agri-tourism In New York State

    Agri-tourism events like Maple Weekends and Maple Month are an important part of tourism in New York State. Governor Hochul recently announced that New York State welcomed a record 291.5 million visitors in 2022, the largest number of visitors in New York State’s history, generating more than $78.6 billion in direct spending and $123 billion in total economic impact. The Governor has continued to support state tourism through I LOVE NY marketing efforts to encourage travel throughout New York and tens of millions of dollars in direct support to tourism organizations and venues for tourism-related marketing efforts and capital projects.

    State Agriculture Commissioner Richard A. Ball said, “Maple syrup is not only our sweetest crop, but it’s also the first crop of the new year. New York’s maple producers continue to do an outstanding job keeping our state at the forefront of the industry, and Maple Weekends give all of us an opportunity to visit a farm and see how they turn tree sap into syrup, candy, and so much more. I encourage everyone to visit a farm near you this year to see this work in action and learn more about this important part of our state’s agricultural economy.”

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Global: Trump threats: Is foreign policy the biggest issue for Canadian voters this election?

    Source: The Conversation – Canada – By Adam Chapnick, Professor of Defence Studies, Royal Military College of Canada

    Canadians are heading once again to the polls on April 28 to vote in a federal election.

    This election will offer voters competing visions of Canada’s future at a time when it has become all but impossible to separate foreign policy from domestic politics.

    There’s no question much of the conversation during the campaign will centre on how the next government will deal with United States President Donald Trump amid his continuing threats to Canadian sovereignty.

    But even though the Trump administration has undermined the liberal democratic world order in which Canada has prospered for close to a century, it’s unclear whether threats of a global tariff war, an ongoing divisive conflict in the Middle East and continued Russian aggression in Ukraine will directly affect how Canadians cast their votes.

    Most political scientists have traditionally argued that foreign policy does not matter to Canadians at the voting booth.

    But a recent book by historian Patrice Dutil has claimed that “at least half of Canada’s national elections featured substantive discussions of Canada’s place in the world.”

    So who’s right?

    Foreign policy as an issue

    My new report, “Foreign Policy and Canadian Elections: A Review,” finds truth on both sides.

    Foreign policy is what people who study elections call an “issue,” just like the economy, national security or health care.

    Issues compete with many other considerations — like ideology, perceptions of leadership and the need for change — to determine a voter’s ultimate decision.

    Local candidates can affect how people vote, as can party affiliation. If you live in a riding where your preferred candidate is unlikely to win, you might vote strategically.

    According to Canadian political scientist Elizabeth Gidengil, for an issue like foreign policy to really matter in an election, it must satisfy three conditions:

    • Political parties must position themselves on opposite sides of it;
    • Voters must be aware of the differences between the parties’ views;
    • The balance of opinion on the issue must clearly favour one side over the other.

    That rarely happens in relation to Canadian foreign policy. Our political parties don’t typically differ significantly on world affairs. When they do disagree, it’s unusual for the public to overwhelmingly support one side over the other.




    Read more:
    Trump’s potential embrace of ‘continentalist geopolitics’ poses grave risks to Canada


    Handling the Trump threat

    There are no real divisions between the election’s front-runners — Liberal Mark Carney and Conservative Pierre Poilievre — over how to deal with Trump.

    Both have pledged that Canada will never become the 51st state and have promised to strike back at American tariffs with economic measures of their own.

    Poilievre says he’ll manage Canada-U.S. relations more effectively than the Liberals would, but he has not proposed any different tactics to do so.

    On the other hand, Poilievre was clearly onto something in his endless quest to make the election all about the Justin Trudeau government’s carbon tax and rebate.

    Until Carney replaced Trudeau, the differences between the Conservatives and the Liberals on carbon pricing were stark. Thanks to an extraordinary Conservative marketing campaign, the Canadian public was well aware of those differences — and a significant majority of Canadians sided with Poilievre.

    Now that Carney has axed the tax himself, those differences have become much less significant.

    Domestic politics aside, Trump will still loom large throughout the next five weeks.

    But international and domestic issues have been, and remain, sufficiently interconnected that it’s hard to discuss one to the exclusion of the other.

    Free trade with the United States was a key topic of debate during four election campaigns — 1891, 1911, 1935, 1988 — because of its impact on Canadians’ sense of independence.

    Canadians were divided over conscription during the 1917 election campaign. They differed over support for Britain during the 1956 Suez crisis and throughout the election the following year.

    Just as the American invasion of Iraq split the Liberals and the Canadian Alliance during the election of 2003, so did attitudes towards increased defence spending in 2000. Canadian support for Syrian refugees came up regularly during the 2015 election campaign.

    Still, it’s not clear if these differences affected more than a small number of individual Canadians when they marked their ballots.

    Voters tend to cast their ballots emotionally, and even though Trump is preoccupying the national consciousness at the moment, the leading political parties have not offered us specific policy alternatives to deal with him.

    What’s ahead this election campaign

    Over the next five weeks, Canadians should expect to learn about the leading political parties’ views on relations with the U.S., the situations in the Middle East and Ukraine, foreign interference in the affairs of state and Canada’s global defence.

    Voters can and should demand that those who wish to lead the country are thoughtful and literate on these and other international issues.

    As then Prime Minister Stephen Harper reflected in 2011:

    “Since coming to office — in fact, since becoming prime minister [in 2006] — the thing that’s probably struck me the most in terms of my previous expectations … is not just how important foreign affairs/foreign relations is, but in fact that it’s become almost everything. There’s hardly anything today of any significance that doesn’t have a huge international dimension to it.”

    But expecting party views on foreign policy to shape the election’s outcome is probably unrealistic.

    When we head to the voting booths, most Canadians will likely just listen to their gut.

    Exactly how Carney or Poilievre promises to deal with Trump probably won’t matter nearly as much as who they simply feel will do a better job on a host of issues.

    Adam Chapnick does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Trump threats: Is foreign policy the biggest issue for Canadian voters this election? – https://theconversation.com/trump-threats-is-foreign-policy-the-biggest-issue-for-canadian-voters-this-election-247065

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI Global: Can Mark Carney truly connect with Canadian voters? Canada will now find out

    Source: The Conversation – Canada – By Kevin Quigley, Scholarly Director of the MacEachen Institute for Public Policy and Governance, Dalhousie University

    After a busy two weeks as prime minister, Mark Carney has called an election for April 28.

    As the first in Canadian history to be named prime minister without ever having held public office, Carney is hoping he can win the trust of Canadians. He’ll run for a seat in the Ottawa riding of Nepean.

    Trustworthiness is awarded to those who are at least perceived as knowledgeable, transparent and concerned. Can Carney pull it off?

    When it comes to economics, Carney is among the most knowledgeable in the country. After obtaining a PhD at the University of Oxford, Carney has had a distinguished public service career in the Canadian Department of Finance, the Bank of Canada and the Bank of England.

    With such a high level of economic uncertainty today in the face of repeated threats from United States President Donald Trump, his supporters say he’s the right person to lead Canada. His chief rival, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre, was first elected to the House of Commons at the age of 25 and has quite a different CV.

    Is Carney empathetic?

    Carney, however, might struggle more with the other characteristics of trustworthiness — seeming open and showing concern.

    The Conservatives have criticized Carney for not being more transparent about his private financial interests. While Carney is following disclosure rules, the Conservatives argue Canadians need to know more about whether he’s in a conflict of interest when he makes decisions in government.

    Carney’s answers to questions about his time at Brookfield Asset Management have on occasion been unsteady.

    On the surface, this is about transparency, but in fact it’s just as much about empathy and whether Carney can relate to working-class voters. By alluding to Carney’s wealth and connections, the Conservatives are implying that Carney is an out-of-touch elite who doesn’t share the concerns of average Canadians.

    Some of the early visuals of Carney can cut both ways.

    His recent chummy embrace at the Élysée with French President Emmanuel Macron exemplifies how immediately comfortable he is with world leaders. Some will find this reassuring, given the state of geopolitics; others might find it privileged and off-putting. Even his hockey skills, which were part of a recent photo-op in Edmonton when he practised with the Oilers, were acquired partly during his time at Harvard University, an institution among the most elite in the world.

    Empathy, instinct

    Can Carney connect with people?

    Arguably, he needs work on this front. He might consider some of his Liberal predecessors.

    Former prime minister Justin Trudeau could certainly rally a crowd. Trudeau became a motivational speaker in the 2000s and used opportunities like the WE Charity to practise public speaking to what would become an important constituency for him — young voters — when he led the Liberals to victory in 2015.

    Not everything can be taught at school. Political instinct is also crucial. It requires reconciling the knowledge of experts with the concerns of everyday citizens. There is no formula for this balance sheet.

    Here again, Trudeau had insight. Bill Morneau, a corporate executive himself and the former federal finance minister, noted after the COVID-19 pandemic that government payouts had been too generous and driven more by Trudeau’s view of the politics of the moment than by the economic analysis provided to him by the Finance Department.

    This may be so, but most would say Trudeau handled the early stages of the pandemic deftly.

    Chretien’s skills

    It was interesting that at the recent Liberal convention confirming Carney as leader, delegates gushed over former prime minister Jean Chretien, far from an elitist. A winner of three consecutive majorities, Chretien delivered a speech that went over at least as well with delegates as Carney’s.

    Chretien had unparalleled political instincts. When Conservative Prime Minister Brian Mulroney rolled out the GST in 1991, it was deeply unpopular. Despite Chretien later famously backtracking on his original opposition to the GST, the Liberal Party under his stewardship used the issue to exact maximum damage on the Progressive Conservatives, delivering them a near-fatal blow.

    Chretien’s killer instincts trumped expert knowledge. While the Progressive Conservatives paid a heavy price for adopting the GST, the policy was largely advocated and shaped by business and economic elites, including in the Department of Finance. Good economics does not always make for good politics.

    Emotions to run high

    If the 1988 federal election that focused almost exclusively on free trade with the U.S. is any indication of what the next few weeks will look like in Canada, the election campaign is going to get heated quickly. Arguments may be more emotional than sensible.

    The fact that Carney dropped the carbon tax and capital gains tax was an early sign that he’s not an economist anymore, he’s a politician.

    The challenge for Carney — and for any politician in the heat of an election campaign battle — will be to find the sweet spot that reconciles expert opinion with public concerns and to articulate policies in a manner that voters will understand and support.

    Kevin Quigley receives funding from SSHRC.

    ref. Can Mark Carney truly connect with Canadian voters? Canada will now find out – https://theconversation.com/can-mark-carney-truly-connect-with-canadian-voters-canada-will-now-find-out-252365

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI Global: Trump threats: Is foreign policy really the biggest issue for Canadian voters this election?

    Source: The Conversation – Canada – By Adam Chapnick, Professor of Defence Studies, Royal Military College of Canada

    Canadians are heading once again to the polls on April 28 to vote in a federal election.

    This election will offer voters competing visions of Canada’s future at a time when it has become all but impossible to separate foreign policy from domestic politics.

    There’s no question much of the conversation during the campaign will centre on how the next government will deal with United States President Donald Trump amid his continuing threats to Canadian sovereignty.

    But even though the Trump administration has undermined the liberal democratic world order in which Canada has prospered for close to a century, it’s unclear whether threats of a global tariff war, an ongoing divisive conflict in the Middle East and continued Russian aggression in Ukraine will directly affect how Canadians cast their votes.

    Most political scientists have traditionally argued that foreign policy does not matter to Canadians at the voting booth.

    But a recent book by historian Patrice Dutil has claimed that “at least half of Canada’s national elections featured substantive discussions of Canada’s place in the world.”

    So who’s right?

    Foreign policy as an issue

    My new report, “Foreign Policy and Canadian Elections: A Review,” finds truth on both sides.

    Foreign policy is what people who study elections call an “issue,” just like the economy, national security or health care.

    Issues compete with many other considerations — like ideology, perceptions of leadership and the need for change — to determine a voter’s ultimate decision.

    Local candidates can affect how people vote, as can party affiliation. If you live in a riding where your preferred candidate is unlikely to win, you might vote strategically.

    According to Canadian political scientist Elizabeth Gidengil, for an issue like foreign policy to really matter in an election, it must satisfy three conditions:

    • Political parties must position themselves on opposite sides of it;
    • Voters must be aware of the differences between the parties’ views;
    • The balance of opinion on the issue must clearly favour one side over the other.

    That rarely happens in relation to Canadian foreign policy. Our political parties don’t typically differ significantly on world affairs. When they do disagree, it’s unusual for the public to overwhelmingly support one side over the other.




    Read more:
    Trump’s potential embrace of ‘continentalist geopolitics’ poses grave risks to Canada


    Handling the Trump threat

    There are no real divisions between the election’s front-runners — Liberal Mark Carney and Conservative Pierre Poilievre — over how to deal with Trump.

    Both have pledged that Canada will never become the 51st state and have promised to strike back at American tariffs with economic measures of their own.

    Poilievre says he’ll manage Canada-U.S. relations more effectively than the Liberals would, but he has not proposed any different tactics to do so.

    On the other hand, Poilievre was clearly onto something in his endless quest to make the election all about the Justin Trudeau government’s carbon tax and rebate.

    Until Carney replaced Trudeau, the differences between the Conservatives and the Liberals on carbon pricing were stark. Thanks to an extraordinary Conservative marketing campaign, the Canadian public was well aware of those differences — and a significant majority of Canadians sided with Poilievre.

    Now that Carney has axed the tax himself, those differences have become much less significant.

    Domestic politics aside, Trump will still loom large throughout the next five weeks.

    But international and domestic issues have been, and remain, sufficiently interconnected that it’s hard to discuss one to the exclusion of the other.

    Free trade with the United States was a key topic of debate during four election campaigns — 1891, 1911, 1935, 1988 — because of its impact on Canadians’ sense of independence.

    Canadians were divided over conscription during the 1917 election campaign. They differed over support for Britain during the 1956 Suez crisis and throughout the election the following year.

    Just as the American invasion of Iraq split the Liberals and the Canadian Alliance during the election of 2003, so did attitudes towards increased defence spending in 2000. Canadian support for Syrian refugees came up regularly during the 2015 election campaign.

    Still, it’s not clear if these differences affected more than a small number of individual Canadians when they marked their ballots.

    Voters tend to cast their ballots emotionally, and even though Trump is preoccupying the national consciousness at the moment, the leading political parties have not offered us specific policy alternatives to deal with him.

    What’s ahead this election campaign

    Over the next five weeks, Canadians should expect to learn about the leading political parties’ views on relations with the U.S., the situations in the Middle East and Ukraine, foreign interference in the affairs of state and Canada’s global defence.

    Voters can and should demand that those who wish to lead the country are thoughtful and literate on these and other international issues.

    As then Prime Minister Stephen Harper reflected in 2011:

    “Since coming to office — in fact, since becoming prime minister [in 2006] — the thing that’s probably struck me the most in terms of my previous expectations … is not just how important foreign affairs/foreign relations is, but in fact that it’s become almost everything. There’s hardly anything today of any significance that doesn’t have a huge international dimension to it.”

    But expecting party views on foreign policy to shape the election’s outcome is probably unrealistic.

    When we head to the voting booths, most Canadians will likely just listen to their gut.

    Exactly how Carney or Poilievre promises to deal with Trump probably won’t matter nearly as much as who they simply feel will do a better job on a host of issues.

    Adam Chapnick does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Trump threats: Is foreign policy really the biggest issue for Canadian voters this election? – https://theconversation.com/trump-threats-is-foreign-policy-really-the-biggest-issue-for-canadian-voters-this-election-247065

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI Global: How political leaders communicate climate policy will be a defining factor this election

    Source: The Conversation – Canada – By Andrew Heffernan, Climate Associate at the Information Integrity Lab and Adjunct Professor in Political Studies, L’Université d’Ottawa/University of Ottawa

    Prime Minister Mark Carney has called an April 28 federal election, setting the stage for a campaign where climate policy could be a central issue.

    The current iteration of Canada’s consumer carbon rebate is dead — which many view as a casualty of effective communication — yet climate policy remains a pressing topic for voters and a major battleground for political leaders.




    Read more:
    The Canada Carbon Rebate is still widely misunderstood — here’s why


    As Canada grapples with intensifying climate-related challenges, the next government will not only need to implement evidence-based policies to meet international climate commitments, but also effectively communicate its vision to voters.

    The public remains concerned about environmental issues, yet many are worried that bold climate policies have damaged the economy. This tension between environmental responsibility and economic growth will shape how each party formulates and communicates their climate policies in the upcoming campaign.

    The Liberals: Navigating the middle ground

    For Carney and the Liberal Party, the challenge is twofold. First, the Liberals must present a new climate plan after the collapse of the consumer carbon rebate, which has faced widespread public opposition in recent years.

    While the new Liberal leader has already terminated the the carbon rebate, it still remains unclear what exactly his comprehensive climate plan will look like. Carney’s website states that his strategy will: “Provide incentives for consumers. Put more of the burden on big polluters. And help us build the strongest economy in the G7.”




    Read more:
    Big government, big trouble? Defending the future of Canada’s climate policy


    This suggests his climate policy will hinge more on positive incentives for consumers to invest in sustainable approaches rather than putting a cost on polluting.

    While the carbon rebate initially enjoyed broad support as a key tool for reducing emissions, it has become a lightning rod for political controversy.

    Climate change is no longer just an environmental issue; it’s increasingly seen as a matter of economic survival, with green energy jobs and clean technologies representing an opportunity for Canada to position itself as a global leader in the sector.

    Carney will have to make a convincing case that his policy will create jobs, stimulate innovation and provide a clear path toward a greener, more sustainable economy.

    Failing to do so could lead to the loss of centrist and moderate voters, some of whom are wary of the perceived economic risks of aggressive climate action.

    The Conservatives: Axing the rebate isn’t enough

    On the opposite end of the political spectrum, federal Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre has made axing the carbon rebate a central part of his platform.

    Framing the carbon rebate as an economic penalty, Poilievre has played into populist sentiments by promising to “axe the tax” and relieve financial pressures on Canadian families and businesses.

    However, even if the Conservatives are successful in eliminating the carbon rebate, they still face the challenge of needing a comprehensive climate policy that lowers emissions and meets Canada’s Paris Agreement targets. Poilievre has said he would not withdraw Canada from the accord, but he hasn’t addressed how he would meet Canada’s commitments.

    Poilievre’s populist rhetoric may resonate with voters who feel economically squeezed, but it’s unlikely to be enough to win over voters concerned about the climate crisis — especially as he has voted against environmental and climate action in Parliament over 400 times in his career, a point his opponents will be sure to raise repeatedly.

    For the Conservatives, the real challenge will be how to present a climate policy that appeals to both economic conservatives, who prioritize fiscal responsibility, and environmental conservatives, who are concerned about the future of the planet.

    Poilievre will need to clearly articulate how his policies will preserve Canada’s environmental future without stifling economic growth or inflating costs for the average Canadian.

    NDP and Green Party

    A key piece of the future of climate policy in Canada will be the NDP and Green Party, who are generally considered left-of-centre parties alongside the governing Liberals.

    The NDP, which can siphon progressive votes away from the Liberals — which sometimes benefits Conservatives — have been clear as mud when it comes to their climate policy for the next election.

    NDP leader Jagmeet Singh rescinded his party’s long-standing support for the Liberal carbon rebate in April 2024, but has not yet said what his party would put in its place.

    Meanwhile, the Green Party, which has historically played a less significant role in electoral outcomes in terms of vote splitting, has generally maintained its support for the carbon rebate. Its website suggests the party supports the polluter-pays principle. However, the Greens have yet to take a clear stance on the shifting climate grounds on which this election could partially be fought.

    Political communication the key to success

    In the coming years, the future of climate policy in Canada will be less about crafting the perfect policy and more about crafting a message that addresses how people are feeling.

    The Liberal Party has been open about the demise of the carbon rebate being a combination of a lack of their own effective communication strategy, mixed with harmful disinformation campaigns that led to the demise of their signature climate policy.

    For the Liberals, Conservatives, NDP and Greens alike, the road to effective climate policy will lie in this communication. Political leaders will need to balance ambition and pragmatism, ensuring their policies align with Canadians’ economic interests.

    With 71 per cent of Canadians suggesting they want the next government to do more to address climate change, leaders who can articulate a vision for a sustainable, prosperous future while addressing the immediate concerns of Canadians will be the ones who have the best chance of winning the public’s trust — and the next election.

    Andrew Heffernan is affiliated with the Liberal Party of Canada.

    ref. How political leaders communicate climate policy will be a defining factor this election – https://theconversation.com/how-political-leaders-communicate-climate-policy-will-be-a-defining-factor-this-election-251990

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI China: China has considerable room for counter-cyclical adjustment: official

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    BEIJING, March 23 — China still has considerable room for counter-cyclical adjustment in macro policies and is confident in delivering high-quality development that will contribute stability and certainty to global prosperity, a senior official said here Sunday.

    Since the beginning of this year, China’s economy has continued its steady recovery and growth momentum, laying a solid foundation for a good start, Han Wenxiu, executive deputy director of the Office of the Central Committee for Financial and Economic Affairs, said at the China Development Forum 2025.

    Amid rising external instability and uncertainty, China will remain firmly focused on pursuing its own development, leveraging the certainty of high-quality growth to offset external uncertainties and striving to serve as a stabilizing anchor for the global economy, Han added.

    The China Development Forum 2025 is scheduled from March 23 to 24, with the theme of “Unleashing Development Momentum for Stable Growth of Global Economy.”

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: FS gives keynote speech in Beijing

    Source: Hong Kong Information Services

    Continuing his visit to Beijing, Financial Secretary Paul Chan today attended the China Development Forum opening ceremony and delivered a keynote speech at the forum’s Symposium on Igniting Growth Momentum through Reform.

    In the speech, Mr Chan pointed out three major trends that are profoundly impacting the global political landscape and economic development.

    He said the rise of protectionism and unilateralism is bringing uncertainty and instability to the global economy, while the trend of regionalisation is reshaping international economic and trade relations, as well as the global trading system.

    At the same time, the emergence of economies in the Global South is becoming a new driving force for economic growth, while technological innovation, particularly artificial intelligence (AI), is triggering changes in production models, business models and consumption patterns.

    He emphasised that in the face of a complex and changing global situation, China remains steadfast in embracing true multilateralism, and works with countries to promote inclusive economic globalisation. He also remarked that China has stressed the need to expand high-level opening-up and advance institutional innovation, deepen reforms in the technology sector, and nurture new quality productive forces based on local conditions.

    Separately, the Financial Secretary mentioned that Hong Kong, under “one country, two systems”, has unique advantages and can play a special role in deepening international exchanges and co-operation, contributing to the country’s high-level opening-up and quality development while creating greater business opportunities for global economies and enterprises.

    First, Hong Kong will leverage its advantage of connecting both the Mainland and the world. While strengthening ties with traditional markets in Europe and the Americas, Hong Kong will explore new markets and develop high-value multinational supply chain management and trade financing services to support Mainland enterprises in going global.

    Second, through financial empowerment, Hong Kong is actively supporting the financing needs of enterprises and projects in areas such as tech development and climate change. The city will continue to enhance the breadth, depth and efficiency of its financial markets to promote mutual benefit between finance and the real economy.

    Third, Hong Kong will drive technological innovation with a particular focus on AI. Leveraging strengths in innovation and technology, international capital, data and talent, along with the innovative capabilities, depth of industries and wide scope of application scenarios of sister cities in the Greater Bay Area, Hong Kong is committed to becoming a hub for international exchange and co-operation in the AI industry.

    Hong Kong also aims to support the growth of technological innovation and future industries by building an ecosystem of “patient capital”, he added.

    Mr Chan will return to Hong Kong tomorrow morning.

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-OSI China: Chinese premier pledges further opening up amid rising global uncertainties

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    BEIJING, March 23 — Chinese Premier Li Qiang on Sunday pledged to unswervingly advance opening up and cooperation amid rising global instability and uncertainty.

    Li made the remarks in a keynote speech at the opening ceremony of the China Development Forum 2025 in Beijing.

    China will continue to welcome enterprises from around the world with open arms, further expand market access, actively address the concerns of businesses, and facilitate the deeper integration of foreign-funded enterprises into the Chinese market, he said.

    The increasing global economic fragmentation, coupled with rising instability and uncertainty in today’s world, underscores the growing need for countries to open their markets and for enterprises to share resources, in order to address challenges and pursue common prosperity, the premier said.

    He said China will safeguard free trade, and contribute to the smooth and stable operation of global industrial and supply chains.

    China has set its full-year growth target at around 5 percent for 2025. Li said the decision reflects both China’s profound understanding of its fundamental economic conditions and strong confidence in its governance capacity and future development potential, and pledged efforts to strengthen policy support while stimulating market forces in order to achieve the target.

    The country will implement more proactive and impactful macro policies, further strengthen counter-cyclical adjustments, and introduce new incremental policies when necessary to provide strong support for the sustained improvement and stable operation of the economy, Li said.

    The country will continue to advance the building of a unified national market and unclog bottlenecks in economic circulation to create a better development environment for various business entities, he added.

    Li pointed out that around this year’s Spring Festival, the Chinese economy has seen a surge of phenomenal highlights, with new growth drivers gaining strength across various sectors, which will inject sustained and robust momentum into the economy.

    The China Development Forum 2025 is scheduled from March 23 to 24. The theme of this year’s forum is “Unleashing Development Momentum for Stable Growth of Global Economy.”

    Around 720 people, including entrepreneurs, government officials, experts and representatives from international organizations from home and abroad attended the opening ceremony of the forum, hosted by the Development Research Center of the State Council.

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI: Zaminer Cloud Mining Introduces New Opportunities in Cryptocurrency Mining

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Earn Passive Income with Zaminer

    MIDDLESEX, United Kingdom, March 23, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — As blockchain technology continues to evolve and digital currencies gain traction, the cryptocurrency mining industry is expanding rapidly. ZA FUNDINGS LTD, through its cloud mining platform Zaminer, is introducing innovative solutions to make cryptocurrency mining more accessible, secure, and efficient for users of all levels.

    Simplified and Scalable Cloud Mining

    Zaminer eliminates the need for expensive mining hardware and complex technical setups by leveraging cloud computing. Users can easily create an account and select a computing power package that aligns with their needs, enabling a seamless entry into cryptocurrency mining.

    According to representatives from Zaminer, the platform utilizes state-of-the-art distributed data center technology and advanced mining algorithms to enhance efficiency and optimize mining operations. By removing traditional barriers to entry, Zaminer aims to create a more inclusive mining ecosystem.

    How Users Can Participate

    Zaminer provides an intuitive process for users to start mining cryptocurrencies:

    1. Register an Account: Sign up on the official Zaminer website
    2. Fund the Account: Users can deposit funds via USDT, BTC, and ETH.
    3. Select a Mining Plan: Various computing power packages are available in the “Computing Power Market”.
    4. Start Mining: Once a package is purchased, mining begins automatically, requiring no further manual intervention.
    5. Withdraw Earnings: Users can withdraw funds once their account balance meets the minimum threshold.

    Mining Potential and Considerations

    Mining outcomes depend on factors such as computing power, market conditions, and network difficulty. While some users have found mining to be a viable method of participating in the digital asset economy, results will vary.

    Contract options, durations, and potential earnings

    Key Advantages of the Zaminer Platform Include:

    • Accessibility: No need for specialized equipment or technical expertise.
    • Optimized Profitability: Advanced algorithms enhance mining efficiency
    • Security: Multi-layer encryption and distributed storage protect user assets.
    • Flexible Investment Options: Multiple computing power packages cater to different needs.
    • Global Infrastructure: A network of data centers ensures mining services.

    Advancing the Future of Digital Asset Mining

    As the global digital economy evolves, innovative cloud mining solutions continue to shape the cryptocurrency sector. Zaminer, backed by ZA FUNDINGS LTD, remains committed to developing blockchain-based solutions that provide users with secure and accessible ways to engage in cryptocurrency mining.

    “Our goal is to provide a simplified and efficient mining experience for users interested in participating in the digital economy,” said a Zaminer representative.

    About ZA FUNDINGS LTD

    ZA FUNDINGS LTD is a provider of blockchain-based financial solutions, specializing in cloud mining and digital asset management. Through its flagship platform, Zaminer, the company aims to empower individuals and businesses to participate in the growing cryptocurrency economy.

    Media Contact:
    ZA FUNDINGS LTD
    Email: info@Zaminer.com 
    Website: https://www.zaminer.com/ 

    Photos accompanying this announcement are available at
    https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/a69f153c-2ced-4f66-802d-4ed60e20d5f3

    https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/1a02c975-067d-4a3c-9cde-4c998777eaac

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-Evening Report: View from The Hill: 5 things to look for in the budget – and why we really need another budget soon

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra

    Jim Chalmers likes to boast, or marvel, that he is the first treasurer since Ben Chifley to deliver four budgets in a term.

    If Labor wins the May election, the treasurer will reckon the budget will be done and dusted for this year. But actually, we really need another budget post election.

    That’s for two reasons. First, because this one will be short on any hard reforms or big savings, because it is all about chasing votes.

    From roads to health, this year has been give, give, give from the government. Much of the spending has been matched by the opposition. Just in recent days, the Coalition has said yes to the government’s initiatives to boost bulk billing and to reduce the price of pharmaceutical scripts. At the weekend, it instantly embraced the announcement to extend energy bill relief (A$150 dollars off bills in the second half of 2025).

    Secondly, the budget could, to an extent, be quickly overtaken because it is being delivered days before the Trump administration’s April 2 tariff announcement. That announcement could have big implications for the world economy, which would flow through to the outlook for Australia.

    The international fallout would be more serious for Australia than any direct hits we might take – there are worries around beef exports and pharmaceuticals – although the politics would centre on what happened to our industries.

    Given the election context, you will have to look hard for specific “nasties” in this budget. The main negative is likely to be the overall uncertainty about the future.

    So specifically, what should we look for on Tuesday? Independent economist Chris Richardson suggests, in an interview with The Conversation, five things to track.

    1. The big ‘off-budget’ number

    This is where the cost of initiatives does not directly show up in the underlying bottom line (which will be deficits through the forward estimates).

    Putting large commitments off budget has increased over the years. Richardson says the Albanese government inherited about $33 billion off-budget spending (over the forward estimates), and in this budget it could be more than $100 billion. This includes spending on student debt relief, the NBN, some housing areas, and infrastructure programs.

    Putting lots of items off budget “means less scrutiny and accountability,” Richardson says.

    2. Tax reform (or lack thereof)

    Richardson’s second item won’t involve much of a search. He asks rhetorically, “Will there be any hint the government is trying to do anything about the narrowing base of the tax take?” That is, anything to lighten the very heavy weight we place on personal and company taxes to raise revenue. As an advocate for tax reform, Richarson expects the budget will contain zero in this area.

    3. NDIS spending

    What is really happening with reining in spending on the National Disability Insurance Scheme? The government has made much of its progress towards bringing the growth in its share of spending on the scheme down to a projected 8% annually.

    But Richardson says this is looking at only part of the story. Considerable responsibility is being pushed back onto the states; the federal government agreed to finance half the cost of new services to be delivered through state education and health systems for children with developmental disabilities to curb the burden on the NDIS. “To focus only on the federal spend on the NDIS is to miss the wider cost picture,” he says.

    4. The mid-year mystery

    How will the budget deal with the “mystery” that existed in its December mid-year update? That update did not seem to account for a rise in wages for public servants, even this was clearly in the pipeline.

    5. The Trump factor

    The budget will discuss the risks on the downside for the economy, but how will it deal with what is to come from Donald Trump? What assumptions will it contain on the likely actions of an unpredictable president?

    With the election so close, there will be almost as much interest in Peter Dutton’s Thursday budget reply as in the budget itself.

    The understanding is it will contain some new policy. It could hardly do otherwise. But will whatever Dutton announces stand up to scrutiny? If it is too thin, it will reinforce an impression the opposition is not presenting a credible alternative. In last year’s budget reply Dutton announced his proposed migration cuts and that quickly became mired in an argument about whether his numbers fitted together.

    Under the spotlight in budget week, the opposition also has to be careful with precisely what is being said and committed to. We’ve seen the confusion over its divestiture policy and about a possible referendum to facilitate the removal of dual citizens.

    On Sunday finance spokeswoman Jane Hume gave Labor some material for a scare campaign on the NDIS.

    She told Sky, “The NDIS, for instance, is one of those areas in the budget that has run out of control; it was growing at 14% per annum.

    “It’s been brought under control somewhat. We think that there’s more that can be done.”

    Chalmers immediately jumped on her comments, demanding detail. Labor’s spinners and ad team would have been rubbing their hands.

    Michelle Grattan does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. View from The Hill: 5 things to look for in the budget – and why we really need another budget soon – https://theconversation.com/view-from-the-hill-5-things-to-look-for-in-the-budget-and-why-we-really-need-another-budget-soon-252513

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Alphacrucis University College: Faith-Based Education in Western Sydney

    Source: Murray Darling Basin Authority

    Good morning.

    I begin by acknowledging the Traditional Owners of the land on which we are meeting and pay my respects to elders past and present.

    I also acknowledge:

    •    Professor Stephen Fogarty, President of Alphacrucis University College 
    •    Rev Assoc Prof David Perry, Chair, Independent Higher Education Australia (IHEA) 
    •    Shiekh Shadi Alsuleiman, Australian National Imams Council (ANIC) 
    •    Associate Professor Gil Davis from the Australian Catholic University
    •    Senator Dave Sharma 
    •    Mr Peter McKeon, Chair, Australian Christian Higher Education Alliance 
    •    Ms Margery Evans, Association of Independent Schools of NSW (AISNSW) 
    •    Mr Graham Catt, Independent Schools Australia 
    •    Mr Sai Paravastu, Hindu Council of Australia 
    •    Mr Dallas McInerney, Catholic Schools, NSW 
    •    Mr Ian Liney, Christian Schools Australia 
    •    Mrs Vanessa Cheng, Australian Association of Christian Schools

    And can I thank the team at Alphacrucis for bringing us all together.

    At times like this, that’s really important.  

    We are the best country in the world.

    I really believe that.

    And a big part of that, I think, is because we are made up of people from all around the world, all different backgrounds, all different faiths.

    Living in harmony.

    That makes us different to most other countries.

    It sends a message to the rest of the world about what is possible.

    We haven’t always been like this.

    If we jumped in a time machine and went back to when I was born in the early 70s we would barely recognise the Australia we found.

    The White Australia Policy still hadn’t been completely dismantled.

    Only about 1 per cent of Australians came from somewhere other than Europe.

    Today more than 4 million Australians were born in Asia – or their parents were.

    The number of Indian Australians has doubled in just the last decade.

    After Christianity, the next biggest faith practiced by Australians is Islam.

    The fastest growing religion is Hinduism.

    We are a different country.

    Education has also made us a different country to the one I was born in.

    In 1972 only 18 per cent of Australians finished school. Today’s it’s about 80 per cent.

    Back then less than 10 per cent of young Australians had a uni degree. Now it’s almost one in two.

    That’s nation changing stuff.

    And the truth is religious institutions have done a big chunk of that work.  

    Professor Paul Oslington from Alphacrucis College has made the point that faith-based education was here before our first public universities.

    St James College on King Street was teaching children and adults before the first brick was laid at the University of Sydney.

    Across the country now there are almost 3,000 Catholic, Anglican, Islamic, Jewish and other religious schools.

    That change that I talked about, that’s happened in the last 50 years hasn’t stopped. We are still changing.

    And if we get into a time machine and take it to 2050 it will look a lot different again.

    This is why the Universities Accord is important.

    To help us get ready for that future.

    What it says is that by 2050 we are going to need a workforce where 80 per cent haven’t just finished high school, we are going to need a workforce where 80 per cent have finished school and they have gone to TAFE or university as well.

    That’s a big shift.

    Some of that will happen organically.

    Just because the fastest growing jobs are in professions that require a uni degree or a TAFE qualification.

    But some of it will require reform.

    Reform to our education system.

    To help us get there.

    I said a moment ago about one in two young Australians have a university degree today.

    But it’s not one in two everywhere.

    But it’s not one in two in our outer suburbs. It’s not one in two in the regions or the bush.

    And if we are going to hit that 80 per cent target, we have got to change that.

    That’s what the Accord says. And that’s what the reforms I am implementing are all about.

    Things like:

    •    Wiping $3 billion of HECS debt for more than 3 million Australians. 
    •    Paid prac – financial support for teaching, nursing, midwifery and social work students while they do their prac.
    •    Massively expanding fee-free uni ready courses – those courses that act as a bridge between school and uni.

    All of that is in the Parliament right now.

    It’s just the start.

    The Accord also recommends a new funding system, needs-based funding and a new Australian Tertiary Education Commission to steer reform over multiple governments.

    And I hope to provide you with more detail on all of that before the end of the year.

    There is also another Bill in the Parliament.

    That’s the one that sets up a National Student Ombudsman.

    An independent body to investigate and resolve disputes and give students a stronger voice when the worst happens.

    It will also have strong investigative powers, similar to those of a Royal Commission.

    It is a long overdue response to the appalling evidence of sexual violence and harassment on campuses and in student accommodation.

    But it’s not just about that. Its scope will be broad.

    That includes complaints about antisemitism and Islamophobia or any type of racism or discrimination.

    The bottom line is I want students to be safe and feel safe and if something really bad happens they have a place to go to get action.

    Something else I want to talk about today is this.

    Institutions here in this room help train teachers, nurses, counsellors, lawyers, care workers.

    And you also train pastors and priests and ministers. But we don’t train Rabbis or Imams in Australia. Not yet.

    I’ve spoken a number of times to leaders in the Jewish community and Islamic community and others, like Murray Norman, CEO of Better Balanced Futures, about this.

    I think it’s in our interest as a country to change this.

    For Australian religious leaders to be able to get the training and qualifications they need here in Australia.

    Without having to go overseas.

    I also want to talk to you today about our schools.

    We have got big challenges here too.

    Think about this.

    Over the last eight years the percentage of students finishing high school has gone down not up.

    From 85 percent to 79 percent.

    That drop isn’t happening everywhere.

    In non-government schools the percentage of students finishing school is either pretty flat or going up.

    Where the drop is happening is in our public schools. From 83 percent to 73 percent.

    This is what we have to turn around.

    This is what the reforms I am trying to implement with the States are all about.

    Our non-government schools are fully funded or on a path to be fully funded.

    Our public schools aren’t.

    We need to fix funding and tie that funding to the reforms that are going to help students catch up, keep up and finish high school.

    This not about breaking Gonski. It is about finishing it.

    That’s good for the whole schooling system.

    You know I am a product of public education. And proud of it.

    But I hope you also know that I value what you do too.

    You will never see me attacking faith-based education.

    You are an integral part of our education system.

    One last thing.

    The reforms I am driving aren’t just in our universities or schools.

    If we are serious, we have to go back further than that.

    I am talking about early education.  

    The child care debate is over. It’s not babysitting. It’s early education.

    The first five years of a child’s life are everything.

    Everything they see, everything they hear, everything they eat, every book they open, every lesson they learn shapes the person that they become.

    The Government is now considering the Productivity Commission’s final report on the future of early education.

    It tells us it’s children from poor families who are the least likely to go to early childhood education and care, and the most likely to benefit from it.

    It will help us to build a more accessible and affordable early education and care system, which gives children the skills they need to start school ready to learn.

    All these reforms will help us to continue to write the story of Western Sydney.

    A story of change. A story of progress. A story of aspiration.

    A story made possible by the power of education.

    A story that you are helping to write every day. Thank you for what you do and thank you for being here today.

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency’s (TEQSA) 2024 Conference

    Source: Murray Darling Basin Authority

    I start by acknowledging the Traditional Owners of the land on which we are meeting and pay my respects to elders past, present and emerging. 

    [Acknowledgements omitted]

    Two and half years ago when I got this job, I said I didn’t want to be the type of Minister that just signed letters.

    I wanted to reform the system. 

    To make it better and fairer.

    I suspect now you can see I meant it. 

    And I hope you can see the reason why in the Universities Accord. 

    What it tells us is that by the middle of this century we are going to need a workforce where 80 per cent of people have a university degree or a TAFE qualification.

    That’s up from about 60 per cent today. 

    That’s a big shift. A big change.

    Some of this will happen organically. 

    Think about it. The fastest growing professions all require some sort of tertiary qualification.

    But some of it will require us to change what we do and how we do it.

    The key message in the Accord is that we are not going to hit that 80 per cent target unless we break that invisible barrier that stops a lot of young people from walking through your door. 

    Overwhelmingly, the young people they are talking about are from poor families, from the outer suburbs of our big cities and from our regions.

    Breaking down that barrier means reforming our entire education system.

    Here’s the nub of it.

    At a time when we need more people to go to TAFE and university, the number of people finishing school at the moment is going backwards.

    From 85 per cent 8 years ago to 79 per cent today.

    That drop isn’t happening everywhere. 

    In non-government schools it’s either pretty flat or going up. 

    It’s happening in our public schools. It’s dropped from 83 per cent to 73 per cent in just eight years.

    And in particular its kids from poor families.

    If we are going to hit that 80 per cent target we have got to turn this around.

    And that doesn’t start in high school either.

    The same young people you don’t see walking through your doors, the same young people who don’t finish high school are the same people who fall behind when they are little.

    They are also the same people who are more likely to start behind, to have never been to early education and care.

    Can you see the common thread?

    Fixing this isn’t easy or quick.

    It is going to talk a lot of work and it is going to take time.

    But the first parts of that are in the Parliament right now.

    In the next two weeks six pieces of education legislation will be voted on by the Senate. 

    The first is a 15 per cent pay rise for early educators right across the country.

    Some of the most important workers in the country and some of the most underpaid.  

    If we are going to build the sort of early education system that we need, that Danielle’s team have plotted out for us in their recent report, we need to build the workforce first. 

    And that’s what this is about. 

    The second bill is to increase funding for our public schools – to help complete the work that David Gonski started more than a decade ago. 

    Fully funding all public schools and tying that funding to reforms to turn around that drop in high school completion rates. 

    The third bill is another piece of unfinished business. 

    It extends the system of USIs, or unique student identifiers, that every university student and every TAFE student has to every school student.

    We have been talking about this for 15 years – and now it is finally happening.

    The fourth bill implements the change we are making to international education. 

    It makes important changes to fix integrity issues in the system and introduces limits, or caps, on the number of international students. 

    For VET providers, it will mean they will be able to enrol about 30 per cent fewer students next year than they did last year.

    For universities it’s different. It will mean they will be able to enrol roughly the same number of students next year that they did last year.

    The difference is it won’t just the big metro universities that benefit. 

    And when it passes, Ministerial Direction 107 will go.

    I know how important international education is. 

    It doesn’t just make money. It makes us friends.

    But we have got to get the balance right here.

    And we have also got to remember what the primary and most important job our universities do is.

    And that brings me to the fifth bill. 

    This is the bill that implements the first stage of the Universities Accord.

    It includes almost half a billion dollar investment in paid prac.

    The first time the Commonwealth has ever done this.

    That’s financial support for teaching students, for nursing students, for midwifery students and for social work students, to help support them while they do the practical part of their degree.

    A lot of students tell me that when they do their prac they have to give up their part-time job, or they’ve got to move away from home or work fewer hours. 

    Sometimes it can mean they have to delay doing their degree or not finish it at all.

    This will give people who have signed up to do some of the most important jobs in this country a bit of extra help to get the qualifications they need. And we need.

    Just to give you one example of what this will mean, earlier this year I met a midwifery student at UTS who told me this:

    “I’m a first-year mature-age midwifery student. This payment is going to be absolutely life-changing for me. As a mother of two small children, I’m often balancing between practical work, placement and looking after my babies. 

    “There are literally some days where I’m doing 16 hour days between my study and my work and looking after my children. 

    “I cannot wait for this payment to be available for myself and other future mature-age students who might also want to enrol in this course who previously couldn’t financially afford it.”

    That’s what this reform is all about.

    This is also the bill that will massively expand the number of free enabling courses.

    You know what I’m talking about.

    These are those free courses that are effectively a bridge between school and university. 

    A lot of unis already offer these courses.

    Not many do it better than Newcastle University. They have been doing it now for 50 years. 

    One in five people who get a degree from Newcastle University today, start with one of these free courses.

    People like Jennifer Baker.

    Jennifer was a mum at 19. She worked in hospitality for 10 years. One day she saw an ad for one of these free courses in the local paper. 

    Now she’s got a science degree. An Honours degree. A PhD. And a Fulbright Scholarship. 

    She’s a computational medicinal chemist.

    That’s what these courses do.

    And what this bill does is effectively uncap funding for those courses, right across the country.

    We’ve committed an additional $350 million over four years to significantly expand these courses. 

    It’s an ongoing funding commitment. 

    Universities currently receive as little as $1,286 per place to run these courses.

    These changes ensure that universities will receive $18,278 per place next year, which will be tied to CPI increases each year. 

    It provides funding certainty for universities. 

    It deals with the disincentives baked into the current system. 

    And most importantly, it ensures that these courses remain free. 

    It will help more Australians to get a crack at university and succeed when they get there. 

    The Department of Education estimates that this will increase the number of people doing these free courses by about 40 per cent by the end of this decade and double that number in the decade after that.

    This is also the bill that fixes how HECS debts are indexed. 

    It fixes what happened last year when inflation spiked and indexation went through the roof, and makes sure it never happens again.

    To do this, it caps indexation at either inflation or wage growth, whatever is the lowest.

    And it backdates this to June last year. 

    That on its own will wipe $3 billion in student debt for more than 3 million people.

    But it is just the first step in making HECS fairer. 

    As you know, a bit over a week ago, the Prime Minister announced that if we win the next election, the first piece of legislation we introduce will cut all student debts by a further 20 per cent. 

    For someone with an average student debt of around $27,000 the legislation in the Parliament at the moment will wipe about $1,200 off their debt. This will wipe a further $5,500 off it. 

    That’s real help for a lot of young Australians, just out of uni or just out of TAFE, just moved out of home, just getting started.

    And we will also make another change, to make it easier to pay off your student debt.

    We will increase the salary you have to earn before you have to start paying it off from $54,000 to $67,000. 

    And will reduce your annual minimum repayments.

    For someone on about $70,000, for example, this will mean you have to repay more than $1,000 less a year.

    It’s another recommendation of the Universities Accord. In fact it’s a recommendation from the architect of HECS, Professor Bruce Chapman. 

    The fact is university is more expensive today than it was when most of us were uni students. 

    When HECS was first created students paid an average of about 24 per cent of the cost of degree. 

    This increased to about 36 per cent in the late 1990s. 

    And now, because of the changes the previous government made, it’s about 45 per cent. 

    Cutting student debt by 20 per cent fixes that for a generation of Australians. 

    But there is more to do. 

    That includes changing the way we fund universities. 

    Part of that is uncapping the number of places at university for students from disadvantaged backgrounds who get the marks for the course they want to do. 

    Part of that is a new needs-based funding system, so these same students get the extra academic and wraparound support that they need to succeed when they get there. 

    And part of that is a new Australian Tertiary Education Commission.

    A steward. To drive reform over the long term. 

    And I hope to provide you with more detail on all of that before the end of the year.

    Finally, the sixth bill that I want the Senate to pass in the next two weeks creates a National Student Ombudsman. 

    When I was at this conference last year, I talked about the scourge of sexual violence in our universities and I said that change is coming.

    And change is coming. 

    What we are establishing is a dedicated, national body to handle student complaints within our higher education system.

    Equipped with the power:

    • To investigate complaints;
    • To bring parties together to resolve issues, including offering restorative engagement processes and alternative dispute resolution where appropriate;
    • To make findings and recommendations on what actions universities should take; and
    • To monitor the implementation of those recommendations.

    It will also have the sort of investigative powers a Royal Commission has. That includes the power to:

    • To require a person or university to provide information, documents or other records relevant to an investigation;
    • To enter premise of a university as part of an investigation; and
    • To require a person to attend and answer questions before the Ombudsman.

    Recent events at St Paul’s College in Sydney remind us of how important this work is. 

    This is another recommendation of the Universities Accord.

    And it’s not just about sexual violence. 

    It will be able to investigate everything from complaints about homophobia to antisemitism to Islamophobia to any other form of racism or discrimination.  

    This will complement the work of TEQSA.

    A couple of weeks ago I was with Dr Russell and the team at TEQSA for a meeting they organised with all Vice Chancellors as well as the Special Envoy to Combat Antisemitism and the Race Discrimination Commissioner.

    It was focussed on lessons learned from the last few months, sharing best practice and the work we need to do together to ensure students and staff are safe and feel safe on campus.  

    As part of this, TEQSA is currently developing ‘Sector Guidance’ and a ‘Statement of Regulatory Expectations’ for Australian higher education providers.

    To help manage contested issues, protests, and improve complaints and grievance services.

    Can I thank Dr Russell and the whole team for all the work you are doing here.

    Can I also thank you and the whole team for bringing us together yesterday and today. 

    To grapple with everything from good governance to generative AI. 

    And to talk about what’s next. 

    That’s what our universities are all about. 

    What’s next. 

    What this conference calls “Navigating Tomorrow”. 

    I have talked a bit about that today. 

    But it is really just the start. 

    There is a lot to navigate. 

    And a lot to do. 

    To make our education system better and fairer. 

    And if we get this right. Make the country we love better and fairer too. 

    It’s what makes this job so important and such a privilege. 

    One I will never take for granted. 

    Thank you so much for inviting me to talk to you today.

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: National Association of Enabling Educators of Australia Conference

    Source: Murray Darling Basin Authority

    G’day everyone.

    I start by acknowledging the Traditional Owners of the land on which the conference is taking place and pay my respects to Elders past, present and emerging. 

    I want to also acknowledge: 

    • Emeritus Professor Mary O’Kane 
    • Professor Sarah O’Shea 
    • And Professor Ruth Wallace 

    Thank you for the invitation to speak to you today and I’m sorry I can’t be there in person. 

    Two and half years ago when I got this job, I said I didn’t want to be the type of Minister that just signed letters.

    I wanted to reform our education system. 

    To make it better and fairer.

    And that reform is happening. 

    The Universities Accord, that Professor O’Kane chaired and crafted, provides us with a blueprint for how to reform higher education over the next decade and beyond.

    What it tells us is that by the middle of this century we are going to need a workforce where 80 per cent of people have a university degree or a TAFE qualification.

    That’s up from about 60 per cent today. 

    That’s a big shift. A big change.

    Some of this will happen organically. 

    Think about it. The fastest growing professions all require some sort of tertiary qualification.

    But some of it will require us to change what we do and how we do it.

    The key message in the Accord is that we are not going to hit that 80 per cent target unless we break that invisible barrier that stops a lot of young people from going to university or TAFE.  

    The Accord is massive. Implementing it will take more than one budget or one government, but we have bitten off a big chunk this year.

    29 of the Accord’s 47 recommendations in full or in part.

    And part of that is uncapping funding for enabling courses.

    The work you do.

    Just one of those places where this happens in Newcastle University. 

    They have been doing it for 50 years this year. 

    One in five people who get a degree from Newcastle University today, start with one of these FEE-FREE Uni Ready courses.

    And just one of those people is Jennifer Baker.

    Jennifer was a mum at 19. She worked in hospitality for 10 years and one day saw an ad for one of these free courses in the local paper. 

    Now she’s got a science degree. An Honours degree. A PhD. And a Fulbright Scholarship. 

    She’s a computational medicinal chemist.

    That’s what these courses do.

    They’re a bridge between school and uni to help you get the skills you need to succeed when you get there. 

    Mary and the Accord team recommended we significantly increase the availability of these courses and that’s what we are doing. 

    Last week, we passed legislation to effectively uncap funding for those courses, right across the country.

    We’ve committed an additional $350 million over four years to significantly expand these courses. 

    It’s an ongoing funding commitment.

    Universities currently receive as little as $1,286 per place to run these courses.

    These changes ensure that universities will receive $18,278 per place next year, which will be tied to CPI increases each year. 

    It provides funding certainty for universities. 

    It deals with the disincentives baked into the current system. 

    And most importantly, it ensures that these courses remain free. 

    It will help more Australians to get a crack at university and succeed when they get there. 

    My department estimates that this will increase the number of people doing these free uni ready courses by about 40 per cent by the end of the decade and double the number doing them by 2040.

    That strengthens the bridge between school and uni. 

    Universities have been informed of their initial 2025 Fee-Free Uni Ready places. 

    And this week, applications have opened where unis can apply for additional places. 

    But that’s not all the legislation we passed last week does. 

    It also wipes out $3 billion of HELP debt for more than 3 million Australians.

    And it establishes, for the first time, a Commonwealth Prac Payment. 

    That is, a bit of financial support for teaching students, for nursing students, for midwifery students and for social work students, to help support them while they do the practical part of their degree.

    And this is just the start. 

    We will also establish a new funding system for universities – that guarantees a place in university for everyone from a disadvantaged background who gets the marks to get in.  

    And needs based funding to support them when they get there.  

    And a new Australian Tertiary Education Commission to steer reform over the next decade and beyond. 

    And I hope to have more to say about all of this in the coming weeks.

    We have a good higher education system.

    But it can be a lot better and a lot fairer. 

    That’s what these reforms and the work each and every one of you do everyday is all about. 

    So thank you.

    I hope you have a great conference today.

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: Secretary-General’s message on World Meteorological Day [scroll down for French version]

    Source: United Nations secretary general

    The dark predictions of meteorologists are coming to pass. Our climate is going up in flames. Every one of the last ten years has been the hottest in recorded history. Ocean heat is breaking records. And every country is feeling the effects – whether scorched by fires, swept by floods, or pummelled by unprecedented storms.
     
    The theme of this year’s World Meteorological Day – Closing the Early Warning Gap Together – reminds us that, in this new climate reality, early warning systems are not luxuries. They are necessities and sound investments – providing an almost ten-fold return. Yet, almost half the world’s countries still lack access to these life-saving systems. It is disgraceful that, in a digital age, lives and livelihoods are being lost because people have no access to effective early warning systems.

    The United Nations Early Warnings for All initiative aims for everyone, everywhere to be protected by an alert system by 2027. The world must come together, and urgently scale-up action and investment, to realize this goal.

    We need high-level political support for the Initiative within countries, a boost in technology support, greater collaboration between governments, businesses and communities, and a major effort to scale-up finance. Increasing the lending capacity of the Multilateral Development Banks is key. The Pact for the Future agreed last year made important strides forward, it must be delivered in full. So must the COP29 finance outcome.

    At the same time, we must intensify our efforts to tackle the climate crisis at source – through rapid and deep cuts to greenhouse gas emissions – to prevent it getting unimaginably worse. This year all countries must honour the promise to deliver new national climate action plans that align with limiting global temperature rise to 1.5 degrees Celsius.

    In an era of climate disaster, every person on Earth must be protected by an early warning system as a matter of justice. Together, let’s deliver. 

    ***

    Les sombres prévisions des météorologues sont en passe de se réaliser. Notre climat s’embrase. Les dix dernières années ont été les plus chaudes jamais enregistrées dans l’histoire de l’humanité. Les océans connaissent des niveaux record de chaleur. Incendies ravageurs, inondations dévastatrices ou tempêtes sans précédent : aucun pays n’est épargné par les effets des changements climatiques.

    Cette année, la Journée météorologique mondiale est placée sous le thème « Combler ensemble les lacunes en matière d’alertes précoces », qui vient nous rappeler que, dans cette nouvelle réalité climatique, les systèmes d’alerte précoce ne sont pas un luxe. En plus d’être indispensables, ils représentent des investissements judicieux, puisque les bénéfices qui en découlent sont pratiquement dix fois supérieurs aux montants investis. Pourtant, près de la moitié des pays de la planète n’ont toujours pas accès à ces systèmes d’une importance vitale. À l’ère du numérique, il est déplorable que des personnes perdent la vie ou voient leurs moyens de subsistance anéantis faute d’avoir accès à des systèmes d’alerte précoce efficaces.

    L’initiative « Alertes précoces pour tous » de l’Organisation des Nations Unies vise à ce que chaque habitant de la planète soit protégé par un système d’alerte d’ici à 2027. La communauté internationale doit unir ses forces et accroître d’urgence ses efforts et ses investissements pour atteindre cet objectif.

    Il est primordial que chaque pays accorde à l’initiative un soutien politique de haut niveau, qu’un appui plus énergique soit offert sur le plan des technologies, que les gouvernements, les entreprises et les communautés resserrent leur coopération et que les financements connaissent un véritable bond. Il est également crucial d’accroître la capacité de prêt des banques multilatérales de développement. Le Pacte pour l’avenir, adopté l’an dernier, a permis de poser des bases solides ; il doit maintenant être appliqué pleinement. Il faut également concrétiser les engagements pris en matière de financement à la vingt-neuvième session de la Conférence des Parties à la Convention-cadre des Nations Unies sur les changements climatiques (COP 29).

    Dans le même temps, il nous faut redoubler d’efforts pour chercher à résoudre la crise climatique à la source, en réduisant rapidement et fortement les émissions de gaz à effet de serre, afin d’éviter que la situation n’empire dans des proportions inimaginables. Cette année, tous les pays doivent honorer leur promesse de présenter de nouveaux plans d’action nationaux pour le climat qui soient compatibles avec l’objectif consistant à limiter le réchauffement planétaire à 1,5 degré Celsius.

    À l’ère des catastrophes climatiques, il faut que chaque personne sur Terre soit protégée par un système d’alerte précoce ; il s’agit là d’une question de justice. Ensemble, donnons corps à cette ambition.

    ***
     

    MIL OSI United Nations News

  • MIL-OSI China: China, Japan, ROK FMs pledge to advance trilateral cooperation

    Source: China State Council Information Office

    China is ready to work with Japan and the Republic of Korea (ROK) to elevate China-Japan-ROK cooperation under the new circumstances, and make it more mature, stable and resilient, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi said in Tokyo on Saturday.

    Wang, also a member of the Political Bureau of the Communist Party of China Central Committee, made the remarks at the 11th China-Japan-ROK Trilateral Foreign Ministers’ Meeting with Japanese Foreign Minister Takeshi Iwaya and ROK Foreign Minister Cho Tae-yul.

    Noting that the trilateral cooperation is one of the most deeply rooted, highly institutionalized, and promising cooperation frameworks in East Asia, Wang said the three-way cooperation has yielded positive results over the past 20 years since its inception, which not only benefits the peoples of the three countries and their respective development, but also promotes regional stability and economic integration.

    With the joint efforts of the three parties, new progress has been made in the cooperation in the six key areas identified at the Ninth China-Japan-ROK Trilateral Summit, Wang said, adding that facts have proved that the more solid China-Japan-ROK cooperation, the stronger the ability of the three countries to withstand risks, the stronger the foundation for empowering development, and the more effective the promotion of mutual understanding and friendship between the peoples.

    Wang noted 2025 marks the 80th anniversary of the founding of the United Nations, as well as the 80th anniversary of the victory of the Chinese People’s War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression and the World Anti-Fascist War, and only by sincerely reflecting on history can we truly create the future.

    The three countries should review the consensus of “facing history squarely and looking to the future,” stick to the original intention of cooperation and promote the China-Japan-ROK cooperation to achieve the effect of “1+1+1>3” for the benefit of the three countries, the region and the world.

    Stressing that wind and rain are the norm, but being undeterred by them is a state of mind, Wang said to achieve steady and lasting trilateral cooperation, it is essential to create a virtuous cycle of mutual reinforcement with bilateral relations.

    In particular, the three countries need to respect each other’s core interests, properly manage differences, and continuously build consensus, cultivate momentum and deepen cooperation on the basis of maintaining sound and steady relations, Wang said.

    First, Wang said, the three countries will deepen economic and trade cooperation and strengthen its role as the “ballast stone.” Negotiations on the China-Japan-ROK Free Trade Agreement should be resumed at an early date to reach an agreement, expand mutual trade and investment, set up a trilateral dialogue mechanism on export controls, and maintain the stability and smoothness of industrial and supply chains.

    Second, to promote scientific and technological innovation to stimulate new drivers for growth. In line with the principle of openness and cooperation, we will share innovation opportunities and enable new quality productive forces to better empower the high-quality development of the three countries. A trilateral dialogue mechanism on digital economy cooperation will be established. Japan and the ROK are welcome to actively participate in the China-Japan-ROK Innovation Cooperation Center that China is planning to establish.

    Third, to expand people-to-people and cultural exchanges and consolidate public support. We will strive to increase the number of people-to-people exchanges among the three countries to 40 million by 2030, ensure the success of the China-Japan-ROK Year of Cultural Exchange from 2025 to 2026, continue to build the brands of “Culture City of East Asia” and “CAPMUS Asia,” carry forward the fine traditional culture of East Asia, and promote mutual understanding and friendship among our peoples.

    Fourth, to respond to common challenges and promote sustainable development. We will deepen cooperation in healthy aging, medical and health care, new energy, green development and ecological and environmental protection, and strengthen cooperation in disaster management, police and counterterrorism, and jointly address non-traditional security challenges.

    At present, as changes unseen in a century accelerate, global economic growth remains sluggish, geopolitical conflicts are intensifying and the global openness index keeps declining, Wang pointed out that China, Japan and the ROK, as important countries in the Asia-Pacific and major economies in the world, should adhere to the general direction of open economy, jointly uphold free trade, firmly safeguard the rule-based multilateral trading system, foster an open, inclusive and non-discriminatory international economic environment, and promote economic globalization that benefits all.

    We should actively promote regional cooperation, support the building of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) Community, create more “China-Japan-ROK+” cooperation projects, and inject strong impetus into the development of East Asia cooperation with the vitality of trilateral cooperation, Wang added.

    He said the three countries should practice a new concept of common, comprehensive, cooperative and sustainable security and jointly safeguard regional and world peace, noting we should adhere to the unity of independence and self-reliance and take the destiny of Asia into its own hands.

    The top diplomats of the three countries exchanged in-depth views on trilateral cooperation as well as regional and international issues and made preparations for the 10th China-Japan-ROK Trilateral Summit, believing that they should jointly maintain the momentum of trilateral cooperation, advance practical cooperation in the six key areas in a comprehensive and balanced manner based on the Trilateral Cooperation Vision for the Next Decade, explore new areas of cooperation and expand future-oriented cooperation on the basis of maintaining continuity.

    The three sides also agreed on continuing to deepen people-to-people and culture exchanges, enhance mutual understanding and mutual trust, enrich practical cooperation in various fields, and work for more new outcomes that benefit the peoples of the three countries and the region.

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI China: China to lift hukou-based marriage registration restrictions nationwide

    Source: China State Council Information Office 2

    China will soon offer nationwide access to its cross-regional marriage registration service, following a recent revision of the regulations governing marriage registration, the Ministry of Civil Affairs said on Saturday.
    Under the new rules, couples will no longer need to register marriages in the location of their hukou, which is permanent household registration. Instead, they will be able to choose a registry office in the habitual residence of either party, removing a significant logistical barrier.
    This reform is aimed at addressing the needs of people who live or work away from their registered hometowns, particularly younger generations. Previously, couples had to return to their hukou location for marriage registration, which created travel and financial difficulties.
    According to the latest national census, about 493 million Chinese people lived away from their hukou location in 2020, an 88.52 percent increase from a decade earlier.
    A pilot program for inter-provincial marriage registration began in June 2021 and was gradually expanded to 21 provincial-level regions, including Beijing, Shanghai and Inner Mongolia. By February 2025, approximately 492,000 couples had benefited from the program.
    The reform was made possible through the digitalization of the marriage registration system. A national marriage information database has been established, enabling civil affairs agencies nationwide to share data seamlessly.
    To streamline the process further, the Ministry of Civil Affairs plans to improve digital infrastructure for online appointments and inter-provincial data verification, ensuring a smoother experience for couples across the country.

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI China: Chinese commerce minister meets chairman of BMW AG

    Source: China State Council Information Office

    Chinese Commerce Minister Wang Wentao met with Oliver Zipse, chairman of the board of management of BMW AG, in Beijing on Saturday, according to a statement released by the Ministry of Commerce.

    During the meeting, the two sides exchanged views on topics including the German carmaker’s cooperation with China and the European Union (EU)’s anti-subsidy investigation into Chinese electric vehicles (EVs).

    Wang pointed out that the unilateral and protectionist actions of certain countries have brought significant uncertainty to the global economy. He emphasized that China hopes to work with the European side to become a pillar of the multilateral trading system, injecting certainty and stability into the world.

    The Chinese market remains committed to opening-up, and China’s policies are consistent, Wang said, noting that the Chinese government will advance high-level opening-up and optimize the business environment.

    Wang said that properly resolving the EU’s anti-subsidy investigation into Chinese EVs is of significant importance, as it will send a clear and positive signal to the world.

    China is committed to resolving differences through dialogue, he said, expressing hope that the German carmaker would continue to play an active role in promoting the European side to demonstrate political will and work with China to find mutually acceptable solutions at an early date.

    Zipse emphasized that Europe’s green transformation cannot be achieved without cooperation with China. The company remains optimistic about China’s economic prospects and is confident in its development in the market, he said.

    The company is committed to expanding its investment in China and accelerating the localization of production as well as research and development, Zipse added.

    He also noted that there are only losers and no winners in a tariff war. The company firmly opposes the EU imposing additional tariffs on Chinese EVs and hopes that both the EU and China can properly resolve their differences, he said.

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI China: China, Japan hold sixth high-level economic dialogue

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi, also a member of the Political Bureau of the Communist Party of China Central Committee, meets with Japanese Foreign Minister Takeshi Iwaya in Tokyo, Japan, on March 22, 2025. [Photo/Xinhua]

    TOKYO, March 22 — Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi and his Japanese counterpart Takeshi Iwaya on Saturday co-chaired the sixth China-Japan High-Level Economic Dialogue in Tokyo.

    Wang, also a member of the Political Bureau of the Communist Party of China Central Committee, pointed out that since the normalization of diplomatic relations between China and Japan, bilateral trade has increased more than 300 times and has remained at a high level of 300 billion U.S. dollars for 15 consecutive years, with the accumulative bilateral investment reaching nearly 140 billion U.S. dollars.

    The economic outcomes proved that China and Japan are partners, not rivals, Wang stressed.

    Amid profound adjustments in the global economic landscape, rising unilateral protectionism, and setbacks to economic globalization, China and Japan, as major world economies, should establish a correct understanding of each other, demonstrate responsibilities, seek development with innovative thinking, add momentum to cooperation and mutual benefit, and reduce obstacles and differences, Wang said.

    He called for efforts on four key areas of cooperation, including accelerating the transformation and upgrading of economic and trade cooperation, achieving strong partnerships for mutual success, addressing each other’s concerns in a balanced manner, and strengthening regional and multilateral cooperation.

    The two countries should uphold the tradition of promoting political relations through economic cooperation, and expand dialogue and exchanges across all sectors to cultivate new growth drivers, Wang said.

    Enterprises from both countries should be encouraged to collaborate in artificial intelligence, the digital economy, energy conservation, environmental protection, and green trade.

    Cooperation in medical and elderly care industries will be further strengthened to foster the “silver economy.”

    The two countries should expand third-market cooperation to benefit the Global South, and support each other in the successful hosting of the Osaka Expo and the China International Import Expo, while promoting regional cooperation, Wang said.

    With a forward-looking approach, China and Japan should leverage the China-Japan economic partnership consultation mechanism to enhance government-business communication, expand market access and eliminate discriminatory restrictions.

    The two sides will work to avoid the politicization of economic security in order to maintain stable and smooth industrial and supply chains.

    Upholding Asian values, the two countries should advocate openness over isolation, and promote inclusiveness over exclusiveness, Wang noted.

    Negotiations for the China-Japan-Republic of Korea Free Trade Agreement should be resumed and the process of establishing an Asia-Pacific Free Trade Area should be advanced, according to Wang.

    Officials from 15 government departments of both countries attended the meeting.

    In conclusion, Wang said that the dialogue enhanced mutual understanding and confidence in cooperation.

    At a time when unilateral protectionism is rampant, the dialogue has sent a strong signal in support of a free trade system, adherence to international trade rules, and alignment with economic globalization.

    Both sides should further expand their horizons and explore new areas of cooperation to continuously enrich the China-Japan strategic relationship of mutual benefit, Wang said.

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI Canada: Canada and Yukon announce funding to build a new convention centre in Whitehorse

    Source: Government of Canada News (2)

    March 22, 2025 – Whitehorse, Yukon – Canadian Northern Economic Development Agency

    This is a joint news release between the Government of Canada and the Government of Yukon.

    Today, Dr. Brendan Hanley, Member of Parliament for the Yukon, on behalf of the Honourable Anita Anand, Minister of Innovation, Science and Industry, who oversees the Regional Development Agencies, including CanNor, announced a funding commitment of $56.25 million for the construction of the Yukon Gathering Place, a new convention centre in Whitehorse. Yukon Premier Ranj Pillai also announced a contribution to the project.

    The Centre will be built adjacent to the Kwanlin Dün Cultural Centre on the Whitehorse waterfront in the traditional territory of the Kwanlin Dün First Nation. It will be owned by the Kwanlin Dün First Nation and operated by Chu Níikwän Limited Partnership and the Kwanlin Dün Cultural Centre.

    This investment will help drive economic growth and job creation by strengthening Yukon’s tourism industry and attracting meetings, conferences and events to the territory. It also increases opportunities for northern Indigenous communities and businesses to participate in the economy.

    MIL OSI Canada News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: National licensing for electrical trades

    Source: Australian Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister for Industry

    The Albanese Government will work with states, territories, businesses and unions to design a national licensing scheme for electrical trades people.

    We’re cutting red tape to save tradies time and money.

    This reform is good for workers, good for businesses and will make our economy more productive and competitive.

    It will help housing affordability by easing workforce shortages that are holding back construction of more homes.

    The 2025–26 Budget will enable the design and implementation of the national licensing scheme through the National Competition Policy (NCP) framework.

    The Government has committed $900 million to the National Productivity Fund to drive NCP reforms.

    National licensing will enable people in electrical trades to work seamlessly across state and territory borders without reapplying for a separate licence or paying additional fees.

    By removing unnecessary barriers, this scheme will encourage highly skilled electrical workers to go where they are needed most in the industry, like in housing construction and clean energy.

    As this scheme relates to high‑risk occupations, it will address the need for high standards, while cutting red tape, delays and multiple fees for trades people.

    Of all the construction trades, more workers are employed in electrical services than any other, accounting for around one in seven workers in construction.

    Productivity Commission modelling shows that reforming occupational licensing across a range of industries could provide significant benefits, including a boost to economic output of up to $10.3 billion.

    The Albanese Government has a big and broad economic agenda aimed at boosting productivity because we recognise this is the key to growing our economy and further lifting living standards.

    The Liberals oversaw the slowest decade of productivity growth in 60 years and we’re working hard to turn that around.

    The Liberals abandoned a national license scheme agreed with states and territories at their first Council of Australian Governments meeting under then Prime Minister Tony Abbott in 2013.

    National licensing will complement reforms previously agreed under NCP, including the development of a national screening check for workers in the care sector, streamlining commercial zoning and planning, and removing barriers that inhibit the take‑up of modern construction methods.

    The Albanese Government’s five pillar productivity agenda is focused on creating a more dynamic economy, building a skilled workforce, harnessing data and digital, investing in net zero and delivering quality care more efficiently.

    We’ll make our economy more productive by investing in the jobs and industries of the future and by backing our people, not by making Australians work longer for less.

    Our fourth budget is all about helping with the cost of living, paying down Liberal debt and building a stronger economy.

    We’ll continue to do what we can to make our economy more productive and competitive and ease the burden on tradies and small businesses.

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI Canada: The Government of Canada introduces new employment insurance measures to support Canadian workers impacted by foreign tariffs

    Source: Government of Canada News (2)

    March 22, 2025              Gatineau, Quebec              Employment and Social Development Canada

    Tariffs imposed on Canadian goods by the United States and other trading partners are unwarranted and unreasonable. They hurt Canadian workers and employers and pose a significant challenge to the Canadian economy. 

    While the Government’s primary focus is on having these tariffs removed, it is equally important to help Canadian workers during a difficult and uncertain time. This is why yesterday, Steven MacKinnon, Minister of Jobs and Families, highlighted the Government’s intention to introduce new temporary employment insurance (EI) measures to support Canadian workers whose jobs are impacted by the current economic uncertainty caused by these tariffs.

    The temporary measures will be implemented through a pilot project and include: 

    • Artificially boosting the regional unemployment rates used to determine access to and duration of EI benefits. The rate will be boosted by one percentage point in all EI regions, with no region seeing an unemployment rate of less than 7.1%. This temporary measure will reduce the hours required to qualify for regular benefits to no higher than 630 hours and increase the weeks of entitlement by up to four additional weeks. This measure will be in effect for three months.
    • Allowing claimants to receive EI benefits sooner by suspending the rules around treatment of severance, vacation, and other monies upon separation so that they do not need to be used up before claimants are able to start receiving EI benefits. This measure will be in effect for six months.
    • Waiving the waiting period so that workers will be able to receive benefits for the first week of unemployment, helping unemployed workers more easily adjust to a drop in income. All claimant types (regular, special, fishing) are eligible for this measure. This measure will be in effect for six months.

     
    These measures are in addition to the EI Work-Sharing Program to temporary flexibilites announced by the Government of Canada on March 7, 2025 to make it more accessible to workers and employers. 

    The Government of Canada also recognizes the important role of provinces and territories in their delivery of employment assistance and retraining for EI-eligible workers. The Minister looks forward to further discussions with provinces and territories on workforce development while also advancing labour mobility and foreign credential recognition.

    MIL OSI Canada News