Category: Education

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Rosneft held a series of ski races dedicated to the 80th anniversary of Victory

    Translartion. Region: Russians Fedetion –

    Source: Rosneft – Rosneft – An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.

    Rosneft organized a corporate ski race in Nefteyugansk. More than 450 athletes from the Company’s subsidiaries and family members of oil workers working in several regions of Russia took part in the corporate winter race “Rosneft Ski Track”. Representatives of the “Movement of the First” joined the mass race.

    Earlier this winter season, mass races “Rosneft Ski Track” were held in Angarsk, Ufa and Krasnoyarsk. The total number of participants reached almost 1,500 athletes. The Company dedicated mass amateur competitions to the 80th anniversary of the Victory in the Great Patriotic War, which the entire country is preparing to celebrate this year.

    In Nefteyugansk, five distances were prepared for skiers of various age categories – from 500 m to 10 km. Schoolchildren from the “First Movement” went out in whole classes for some distances.

    Despite the fact that the races have an amateur status, the level of their organization is not inferior to professional competitions. All conditions were created for oil industry athletes and guests of the event. A field kitchen with hot dishes and hot tea was operating at the races, sports equipment rental was organized, places for preparing skis, heated changing rooms and rest areas were equipped. A cultural and entertainment program was prepared for young athletes, a children’s corner and an animator worked.

    The winners of the competition in 13 age groups were determined by professional judges.

    Support for mass sports is one of the key areas of social work for Rosneft and its subsidiaries. The company carries out large-scale work to promote sports and a healthy lifestyle among both its own employees and the population in the regions where the Company operates.

    Ice arenas, sports complexes and multifunctional sports grounds are built in the regions with the funds of the Company and its subsidiaries. The Company also provides support to amateur and mass sports.

    Department of Information and Advertising of PJSC NK Rosneft February 3, 2025

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI: Northfield Capital Announces Changes to the Board of Directors

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    TORONTO, Feb. 03, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Northfield Capital Corporation (TSX-V: NFD.A) (“Northfield” or the “Company”) today announced that Mr. Thomas Pladsen has resigned from the board of directors of the Company (the “Board”), effective January 31, 2025, for personal reasons. Mr. Pladsen has served as a director of the Company for over 30 years, during which time he provided invaluable insight and guidance to the Company. The Company would like to express its sincere thanks to Mr. Pladsen for his long-standing service.

    The Company is also pleased to announce the appointment of Eric Klein as a member of the Board, effective January 31, 2025, to fill the vacancy created by Mr. Plasden’s resignation. Mr. Klein has also been appointed as the Chair of the Audit Committee of the Board, in place of Mr. Plasden, effective January 31, 2025.

    Eric R. Klein, ICD.D, CBV, CPA, is an experienced Executive with over 35 years of experience in Investment Banking, Mergers & Acquisitions, Business Strategy and Corporate Management. As the President of Klein Advisory Services Inc. since 2018, Eric has guided both healthy and distressed entities, focusing on mergers, acquisitions, divestitures, and strategic advisory across various sectors including manufacturing, technology, and financial services. His strategic insights are further underscored by his past advisory role as a Senior Advisor for a Canadian asset based lender, where he was instrumental in portfolio management and spearheading new business initiatives. Previously Eric was an Executive Vice President at Dundee Corp. and a senior Partner at Farber Financial group. Eric has significant board-level experience, serving as Director and Chair of the Audit Committee for several Canadian public companies. Eric holds two degrees from McGill University. He is certified as a CPA, a Chartered Business Valuator (CBV), and holds an Independent Corporate Director designation (ICD.D), demonstrating his commitment to rigorous corporate governance and financial integrity.

    We take this opportunity to welcome Eric to the Board and look forward to his governance and contributions to Northfield.

    The Company has granted an aggregate of 10,000 stock options (“Stock Options”) to purchase class A restricted voting share of the Company (each, a “Class A Share”) to Mr. Klein, at an exercise price of $21.50 per Class A Share. The Stock Options have been granted pursuant to the Company’s Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan, and expire on January 31, 2030.

    About Northfield Capital Corporation

    Northfield is a leading Canadian investment firm with deep roots in resources, mining, aviation, and alcoholic beverages. Founded in 1981, Northfield combines decades of experience with a forward-thinking ethos to unlock opportunities.

    For further information, please contact:

    Michael G. Leskovec, CPA, CA
    Chief Financial Officer
    Telephone: (416) 628-5940

    Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this press release.

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Education Secretary speech on new era of school standards

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Speaking at the Centre for Social Justice, Bridget Phillipson laid out plans for a new era of school standards delivering on the Plan for Change.

    Good morning, everyone.

    Thanks so much for being here. And thanks to the Centre for Social Justice for hosting us. And thanks to Andy.

    It’s great to be back here, this time as Education Secretary, six months into delivering our Plan for Change.

    I know CSJ shares this government’s commitment to ensuring that, whoever you are, wherever you come from, ours should be a country where hard work means you don’t just get by but you get on.

    Some of you were here last year, when I started my speech with a story. And today I want to start with a story too:

    A story about how and why the change I am bringing to the education system matters to me.

    It’s my story.

    I grew up in the late ’80s and early ’90s, a shy little girl, from a tough street in the northeast of England, [political content removed]

    I never met my dad. It was just me and my mum – and my grandparents who lived nearby.

    We didn’t have much. One winter, a neighbour, who himself, he didn’t have very much, found out I’d been playing outside wearing only a jumper.

    He put money through the letterbox in an envelope marked “for Bridget’s coat”.

    Now, not everyone turned to kindness. Crime was a big problem. Our house was burgled time and again.

    And when my mum reported it to the police, our windows were put out, a man turned up with a baseball bat.

    It didn’t seem like that big a deal at the time. These were just things that happened, and frankly not just to us.

    I think often of the children I knew then, held back by who they were, by where they were born.

    So many on my street were denied the opportunity to get on and to succeed.

    Not because they were lazy, they weren’t. 

    They were no less talented than I was, no less ambitious, no less deserving of success.

    But I was given the opportunities that they were denied. I went to great schools, I was taught by wonderful teachers, I had a family that prized learning.

    I was in the very first full cohort to sit SATs tests at Key Stage 1, 2 and 3. I benefited from the national curriculum brought in by a [political content removed] government.

    My school took up that challenge to push kids like me to achieve.

    I worked hard, of course I did.

    But I had the good luck to go to a great school, to have a family who cared deeply about education, a grandfather who read to me week in, week out.

    And like so many stories, this one has a moral lesson at its core.

    I am proof that the system can work, that a great education can be a transformational force, that background doesn’t have to be destiny.

    That belief formed then, is the core of my politics now.

    That the promise our children deserve, that hard work is what counts, no matter your background.

    I believe in that promise, in making that dream real.

    But I saw so many of my friends from my area let down, let down by a system that lacked a restless ambition for their futures, content, too often, to deliver a mediocre education, middling, in schools that drifted, an education that was seen as ‘just fine’ for ‘these kids’.

    For kids like me.

    Michael Gove used to call this ‘the soft bigotry of low expectations’ and with good reason: he was right.

    But I don’t need to be told about that. I grew up with it all around me, in my community, holding back my friends.

    I don’t forget. Not now. Not ever.

    It’s these memories of those injustices, the doors closed, the dreams stifled, the futures denied, that’s what drives me forward in this job.

    I get up every morning to right those wrongs.

    To break down the barriers to opportunity for each and every child.

    Background wasn’t my destiny.

    And I won’t rest until that is true for all children.

    That is my vision for education.

    Opportunity, for those children, for all children. That is our mission, driven by the Prime Minister’s Plan for Change.

    An excellent teacher for every child, a high-quality curriculum for every school, a core offer of excellence for every parent.

    Raising a floor of high standards, below which schools must not slip, above which schools can and must innovate, with no ceiling.

    Now, those memories are from a long time ago. And in the decades since, standards in England’s schools have risen, and millions of children have benefited.

    Our system now has many strengths, to build into that core. The greater use of evidence in classrooms across the country.

    No more flying blind, guided only by tradition.

    Now, what matters is what works [political content removed] reformed exams – more rigour, more challenge.

    Our national curriculum, a national strength, one from which we will build.

    Raising the floor, removing the ceiling.

    Take one example, one that matters immensely.

    Every child learns about the Holocaust, thanks to the national curriculum. That’s the floor we need.

    But teachers can then innovate in how they teach it.

    Stories from newspaper archives of troops finding concentration camps or hearing the testimonies of Holocaust survivors who have been immortalised using recordings and virtual reality technology.

    And now the Curriculum and Assessment Review will take us onward, delivering a core curriculum for all children that is deep and rigorous, knowledge-rich down to its bones.

    And that matters so much, knowledge is foundational, the building blocks of learning.

    It’s no use developing skills if children lack the knowledge to back it up and that curriculum must be taught by the very best teachers.

    As a profession as well as a calling, teaching has come on leaps and bounds, far ahead of when I was at school.

    The use of phonics is just one example where this has delivered for millions of children. Over 100,000 more children every year are securing the phonic foundations of reading since 2012.

    And we will continue down this proud path, for future generations.

    But now, right now, we need more teachers.

    That’s why we are committed to recruiting an additional six and a half thousand new expert teachers over the course of this parliament, ensuring we have more teachers where they are most needed across our colleges and our secondary schools, both mainstream and specialist.

    Because more teachers in our classrooms means more attention for our children. And that attention makes it easier to learn, and drives better attainment.

    More teaching, better learning.

    But more alone is not enough.

    I want to drive up the quality of teaching too.

    Building on the advances in teaching as a profession, and in teacher training.

    That’s why we are requiring all teachers to work towards qualified teacher status – and doubling down on evidence-based training.

    We’ll back our teachers with the very best AI, part of an exciting new wave of technology to modernise our education system.

    These changes are critical for all of our children. But nowhere are they more important than for our children with SEND.

    It’s hard to say about a system that today is failing so many, that there has been progress. The recognition of additional needs, the debate around how we support children with SEND is a sign of progress.

    But there is much, much more to do.

    We must set high expectations for all, spread pockets of excellence right throughout the system. 

    Focus on need and not diagnosis. With children able to access the right support more often in mainstream so that they can learn and thrive.

    Empower schools to intervene earlier, equipping them not just to support, but to excel for children with a range of different needs. Advances in the use of evidence, in the curriculum, in teaching.

    We’ll take that forward, delivering a new for generations of children.

    But perhaps the key driver of rising standards across our schools has been strong multi academy trusts.

    Take an example. Tanfield is a school that sits on the edge of Stanley, just ten miles west of where I grew up.

    Over the decades, tens of thousands of kids with backgrounds just like mine have walked through those school gates.

    And for a long time, the school meandered along, performing poorly, requiring improvement that never quite appeared, delivering outcomes never quite what they could be.

    A reality that year after year, kids were being denied the opportunity to achieve.

    Until Tanfield joined Eden Learning Trust in May 2020. And with a strong head teacher at the helm. That’s when the spark of progress finally arrived.

    The school is now rated as good on some measures, outstanding on others.

    Exam performance rising, above the national average.

    That story fills me with hope, because I know the difference a great school makes to so many children with backgrounds like mine, to severing the tie between background and destiny.

    Academy schools were a part of a great age of reform, from the mid-90s to 2015, a wave of changes that lifted standards for schools and life chances for children.

    Driven forward by a succession of great education reformers – from David Blunkett to Michael Gove, and a generation of dedicated and determined teachers.

    I recognise the focus on tackling low standards in inadequate schools, which previous governments of all parties shared.

    I celebrate the enormous effort by parents and school staff, to haul our entire system into a much better place.

    Strong academy trusts, top teachers, a core curriculum – these are our foundations.

    But sometimes I get the sense that people want to stop there.

    As if we can celebrate progress, but stop pushing for better.

    As if the drive for change, the impatience with failure – that these are the proud tales of yesterday, not the agenda for tomorrow.

    Because I tell you, this government is very clear.

    The journey isn’t over, the mission is never complete.

    It’s almost fifty years since James Callaghan gave a major speech about the purpose of our education system in our country.

    Elements of his challenge, to the established wisdom of his day, are sadly all too familiar.

    He spoke of a system that too often left young people neither ready for work, nor ready for life, the need for more young women to study science, the immense importance of numeracy for the next generation.

    And he spoke of his sympathy with the principle of a national curriculum, a principle that would fall to the next government to deliver.

    But today it is not simply the wisdom of that speech I have in mind.

    Callaghan knew the greatest truth about the determination that governments [political content removed] should have to drive change, for it was he who told us:

    “You never reach the promised land. You can march towards it.”

    So I tell you again, for me, for this government, we know that this march never ends.

    And yet today, the barriers to opportunity have grown only higher, and the stakes for our children are just as high.

    Stuck schools.

    Too many schools coasting.

    Delivering an education that, is just not the standard all children deserve.

    There are more than 600 schools in this country that are stuck, receiving consecutive poor Ofsted judgements.

    More than 300,000 children go to these schools. And what happens to these children?

    They leave primary school with results 14 percentage points worse.

    They leave secondary school with results one grade per subject worse.

    Their life chances, limited by the bad luck of going to a poor school.

    That is our inheritance.  And that is not good enough.

    Stuck schools are the new front in the fight against low expectations.

    I will not accept a system that is content for some to sink, even while others soar.

    These schools must improve, and with the right help, I know they can.

    Our proposals provide a response that is tailored, bespoke, effective – drawing on the insights of new Ofsted report cards.

    Improvement driven by new RISE teams, groups of leading experts who have been there and done it, with a track record of driving up standards.

    Turning around not just schools, but children’s lives.

    The best of the best when it comes to school improvement.

    They will work with schools to get to grips quickly with the problems Ofsted spots, backed with an initial £20m of funding.

    Up to £100,000 per school, dwarfing the basic £6,000 per school that was made available for these very schools by the last government, before being cancelled altogether with structural intervention as a necessary backstop if change does not come quickly enough.

    We now have our first 20 expert advisers in place – and teams are beginning their work with schools up and down the country.

    Trust leaders right at the centre.

    To work with us as partners in the push for better.

    Excellence – for every child.

    High and rising standards – for every child.

    Success – for every child.

    No more stuck schools drifting along.

    Tackling drift by reforming accountability and intervention.

    Now is the time for reform, for renewal, for modernisation.

    To take the whole school system forward.

    The way we hold schools accountable underpins it all.

    How we identify poor performance and drive change,

    To lift the life chances of children.

    We have a strong starting place. The improvements in inspection and accountability starting in the 90s have been instrumental for raising standards in our schools.

    With Ofsted’s role right at its heart.

    And to those who call for the abolition of a strong, independent, effective inspectorate, I have said before and I will say again: never.

    Never will we go back to those dark days of weak accountability.

    Because it was children from disadvantaged backgrounds who suffered the most.

    And because despite those improvements, there is still so far to go.

    So today I am taking us into a new era on school standards.

    Single headline grades were the right innovation at the right time. They brought proper scrutiny to all schools.

    But the time for change has come.

    They had become high stakes for schools but low information for parents.

    And for the challenges we now face, too blunt, too rough, too vague.

    How can it be right that so many critical decisions parents – choices that shape whole lives rest on a single word?

    It simply isn’t enough. Not for schools, not for families, and not for children.

    Our searchlight on poor performance must now become brighter

    to see the problems of today and tomorrow quickly and clearly.

    So a more rigorous system, raising the bar on expectations, on what good really looks like when it comes to the futures of our children.

    Because when we hear that 90% of schools are rated good or outstanding by Ofsted, it’s a reflection of millions of hours of hard work from teachers and leaders.

    But it’s a statistic, I’m afraid, that just no longer paints the full picture.

    Good as a judgement has become too vague to serve its purpose,

    When there are schools rated as “good” in both the top and bottom 1% for attainment.

    So just like we guard against grade inflation, to make sure that results really reflect the achievement of students, we must protect standards here too, because when almost 8 in 10 schools are graded as good, it’s time we bank that progress and take good to another level.

    The imprecision has left too many struggling schools without the support they need to improve.

    If the diagnosis isn’t clear, how can we be confident that the treatment will be right?

    And the change this government brings is one the public know is needed.

    Only 13% of those asked by Ofsted think that the notion that 90% of our schools are Good or Outstanding is truly reflective of the overall quality of schools.

    We need a more diagnostic approach – an approach that is restless and rigorous.

    Our proposals will swap single headline grades for the rich, granular insight of school report cards.

    Raising the bar on what we expect from schools. Shining a light on the areas that matter, each given their own grade.

    Identifying excellence and rooting out performance that falls short of expectations, so that parents have clearer, better information about their local schools.

    And that extra information will underpin changes in how we tackle poor performance.

    The worst performing schools, whether local authority maintained or academies – will be moved to a strong trust.

    That means new leadership brought in to boost the life chances of pupils.

    Children only get one chance: we won’t wait around while schools fail around them.

    And if school report cards identify even one area for improvement for a school, Ofsted will monitor progress, looking out for warning signals, government primed to step in for children, if required.

    The schools and trusts too, able to take swifter action from the more granular school report.

    Because being hands off, for school after school, for year after year, simply cannot be an option when the life chances of our children are at stake.

    And because we know that there is so much brilliance within our schools, so much to learn from and share.

    A new proposed top grade of ‘Exemplary’, for best-in-class practice in a specific area, when Ofsted judge that a school is doing something that is simply too good to be kept inside the school gates.

    Because this is a government that is never content, never complacent, never satisfied, when it comes to standards in schools.

    We want to spread that excellence

    To promote innovation,

    And it’s important we recognise that the best people to do that, the people who so often, will be doing that, are already standing in front of us.

    The best trusts, the best schools, the best leaders.

    Our RISE teams in time providing a universal service, will draw on them, their practice, their knowledge, their experience, helping good schools to become great and the great schools to become even better – spreading their excellence as they go.

    This is a new era in accountability for schools, a new era of relentless improvement. To drive up standards and open up opportunity for all.

    But a new spirit too – including with schools.

    A relationship to improve, not punish, to challenge, not to scold, based on shared aims, not shared hostility.

    An approach that recognises, that when all’s said and done, we all want the same thing.

    Better outcomes for children.

    When I first started in this job, I said I wanted to put education at the forefront of national life.

    So I am delighted to see the debate raging over our reforms – particularly since we introduced our Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill.

    I have to say, I welcome it.

    It is a sign that under this government, once again, education is coming back to the centre of national debate.

    I welcome spirited engagement, I welcome robust challenge, I welcome different views – and I will listen to them.

    That is how we shape the very best education system that our children deserve.

    And that’s why the changes we are making to accountability will draw on the wisdom of the entire sector.

    So I am pleased to announce a public consultation on our proposals for school accountability reform.

    Alongside that, Ofsted are consulting on their proposals for report cards and inspection structures.

    I want – we want – to hear the views of teachers and parents, schools and trusts – all those who care about our children’s futures.

    All parents worry about their children and that’s because they want so much for them.

    There were times when I was small when my mum worried about me.

    People would tell her that I had speech issues, because I talked so little.

    Well, I’m talking now.

    And to the young people, the families, who feel like they don’t have a voice, don’t have a future.

    I say this,

    Under this government, [Political content removed] no longer will where you’re from decide what you go on to do.

    Opportunity, for every child, in every school, in every part of the country.

    Everything I do as Secretary of State, I do for all children.

    The ones who grow up on streets like mine, who don’t – not yet – have a great school to go to, who are weighed down by their background.

    I am asking more of schools, of trusts, of parents, of Ofsted, of myself, and of this government.

    And I make no apologies for that,

    We need change, to turn the drift and delay of today, into the restless progress of tomorrow.

    Because I believe that background shouldn’t be destiny.

    I believe in the power of education to take us to a brighter future.

    And I believe each and every child in our country deserves nothing less.

    Thank you.

    Updates to this page

    Published 3 February 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI USA: Plant Power: A New Method to Model How Plants Move Water Globally

    Source: US State of Connecticut

    Earth systems models are an important tool for studying complex processes occurring around the planet, such as those in and between the atmosphere and biosphere, and they help researchers and policymakers better understand phenomena like climate change. Incorporating more data into these simulations can improve modeling accuracy; however, sometimes, this requires the arduous task of gathering millions of data points.

    Researchers, including UConn Department of Natural Resources and the Environment Assistant Professor James Knighton, Pablo Sanchez-Martinez from the University of Edinburgh, and Leander Anderegg from the University of California Santa Barbara, have developed a method to bypass the need for gathering data for over 55,000 tree species to better account for how plants influence the flow of water around the planet. Their findings are published in Nature Scientific Data.

    Plants play essential roles in Earth’s processes, from capturing carbon and making oxygen available for other life forms like humans. Plants are also responsible for the movement of water, says Knighton, where an estimated 60% of all rain is returned to the atmosphere through transpiration. This huge global-scale movement of water through plants is complex and currently represented by Earth system models (ESMs) in a simplified way says Knighton, where all plants in a region may be considered as a single entity (i.e., a plant functional type),

    “Plant Functional Types (PFTs) are used because we don’t know a lot about the details of individual plant species,” says Knighton, a faculty member in the College of Agriculture, Health and Natural Sciences. “It would be harder to take a detailed map of vegetation over a continent and put in all the right values for each individual species so it’s easier just to consider one generic PFT.”

    The problem with PFTs is that different plant species vary in their hydrologic traits – or how water moves through plants — and this oversimplification of such systemically influential traits could limit the effectiveness of available models to predict the future. Scientists have moved towards accounting for these differences by creating databases, like the TRY Plant Trait Database, where this information is collected. However, Knighton points out that only about 5,000 to 15,000 plant species have had their traits well-cataloged after several centuries of plant science.

    “There are around 60,000 to 70,000 tree species on Earth, meaning that after 200 years, we know maybe 5 to 10% of what’s happening,” he says. “If that were the way we would do things, it would take us another 2,000 years or so to learn about all the plants that we needed to, and at that point, climate change has set in, and it’s too late. We can’t do that. We can’t just wait for field researchers to go out and do their studies and populate this global database. It’s still incredibly useful to conduct field studies, but those alone will not get us where we need to be fast enough.”

    Knighton and his colleagues decided to address this problem and expedite the process by looking at the data for traits that are available, information like how tall a tree grows, how deep the roots descend, or how fast water flows within the plant. They then compared the history of that species and its relatedness to other species in what is called a phylogenetic test for those traits.

    “We looked to see how similar trait values are between closely related species, and the idea behind that is, if these traits are critical for their survival, evolution will have preserved the trait values, they won’t be randomly dispersed,” Knighton says. “For example, if growing deep roots was critical for a certain type of plant to survive, the species that branch off from that one will probably also have deep roots, and everything that’s in that family or that genus will have a similar root structure.”

    Graduate students Caroline Stanton (left) and Kevin Li (right) collecting samples from trees in the UConn Forest. (Contributed photo)

    The researchers performed the test for all the traits, and Knighton says they found high levels of conservation across the phylogenetic tree, which means closely related species tend to have closer trait values.

    “Then we took the phylogeny where you can take all of the plant species on Earth and map them onto each other, and show exactly how closely related each plant is to every other plant,” he says.

    Knighton says they can impute the trait data if they have the information for closely related species, meaning that this data can be inferred without having to take millions of field measurements.

    “We used different numerical machine learning techniques, and in doing that, we were able to come up with a database of these very critical tree values for 55,000 tree species on Earth,” he says. “If you want to do global modeling that includes more detail in the vegetation, which is important, you now have a starting point. You don’t have to use this generic, one plant species per continent approach, you could, in theory, try something more detailed, but putting in all the different species and seeing what happens.”

    Knighton says they consider this work to be a low-order approximation, but it is an important starting point. As more data is collected from field researchers, the data can be used to update and refine the interpolated data to improve the accuracy of this approach.

    This work is the next step in a larger project, the first step of which was a proof-of-concept experiment at a smaller, more local level. That project established this method of imputing hydrologic traits as a viable approach, and Knighton says the next step is to compare the imputed data with observational data that they are collecting in UConn Forest and from other sites around the United States.

    Knighton explains there are 10 sites across the U.S. where ample data is collected, which will serve as test cases. Knighton says master’s student Caroline Stanton ’26 is currently building ecosystem models of each site, and they are calibrating high-resolution models to estimate the traits which they will compare with data that scientists have collected over the last 20 years. Then, they will compare the estimated plant trait results with the observational data collected from the site to see how the quality of the model is impacted by each approach.

    Eventually, the researchers hope to apply the method to forested sites across the globe to study aspects of what drives traits to vary. Understanding the variation in traits across different plant species has the potential to strengthen the accuracy of models, but these data can also give insights into what drives the different traits to vary.

    Knighton says he and his colleagues hope climate modelers will find this information helpful, but they also hope it can improve our understanding of the Earth system overall, and more about the vital roles plants play,

    “Plants control our environment to an incredible degree.”

    This work is supported by the National Science Foundation (Grant numbers 2243263, 2003205, 20230833 and 2216855), Renewable Energy, Natural Resources, and Environment: Agroecosystem Management (GRANT13398847 from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture.)

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA:  UConn Hosts Conference for Undergraduate Women and Gender Minorities in Physics

    Source: US State of Connecticut

    Cameron Brady was the only woman in her undergraduate class to graduate with a Bachelor of Science in physics. While Brady found it easy to work alongside her predominantly male peers at Rowan University, it wasn’t until she attended a conference for undergraduate women in the field that she gained the confidence to pursue the study further. 

    On Jan. 24, Brady, now a UConn Ph.D. candidate in physics, served on a graduate panel at the first UConn Conference for Undergraduate Women and Gender Minorities in Physics (CU*iP)—the same conference that helped launch her career. 

    “The higher-level classes in physics, I was the only woman,” Brady says. “At first, it was hard to have confidence and maybe answer questions or speak out. But eventually, over time, I just learned.” 

    UConn was one of 14 universities selected by the American Physical Society (APS) to host a CU*iP conference. The event was organized by a committee of UConn faculty and graduate students, led by Nora Berrah, Board of Trustees Distinguished Professor of physics. 

    Berrah says physics has historically been a male-dominated field, but while men’s attitudes toward accepting women into the profession have become more positive, women may still wonder if it’s a supportive, friendly environment. 

    “We want to give them a chance and provide a place for them to ask any questions that they have on their minds, because we want them to stay in physics,” Berrah says. 

    Brady hopes this conference will provide attendees with the same opportunities it did for her. After attending a virtual CU*iP conference, Brady said she was inspired by women who continued their careers in physics. That experience propelled her to apply for the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU), a competitive program that provides funding for undergraduates to conduct research at universities across the country. 

    “The graduate students on the panel had done that and talked about it, so it made me want to apply,” says Brady, who went on to complete two REU internships. 

    To support another cohort of women and gender minorities in the field, Brady was one of the many graduate students who helped host about 100 undergraduates from across New England for UConn’s first CU*iP conference, held in Gant West from Jan. 24 to 26. 

    “I want to give back to the community,” says Kaley Wilcox, another physics Ph.D. candidate and conference volunteer. “I know I’m only here because of all the support from my female friends and various underrepresented genders in physics.” 

    Wilcox says her participation in the conference is a way to acknowledge the contributions of other women in the field and to be a mentor and beacon for others so more women can pursue the field. 

    UConn’s Department of Physics hosts the Conference for Undergraduate Women and Gender Minorities in Physics in the Gant Science Complex on Jan. 24, 2025. (Bri Diaz/UConn Photo)

    Berrah spent nearly two years putting the conference together. She and her organizing committee studied previous conferences to gather insight into what students needed, made a conference program featuring presentations from professors and industry leaders, and raised funds to sponsor all the participants’ attendance. 

    For three days, students attended panels and lectures on a variety of topics, including technical knowledge, career paths in the industry, gaining research experience, and navigating mental health in the field. They also had a very important opportunity to meet with students from other institutions and network with their peers and professionals. 

    Josephine Singleton, a junior astronomy major at Mount Holyoke College, says that while her university may be a women’s liberal arts school, there are still very few women who share her major. She says the conference is an opportunity to connect with other women and gender minorities in the field. 

     “Most of us are women or in the LGBTQ community so many of us do support each other in this sphere,” Singleton says. “There’s still a large gap for anyone other than cis men in the field of physics, but I think it is getting better now because I know a lot of Mount Holyoke’s graduates who are now working at places like NASA. It’s good to see that.”   

    Brady hopes the attendees come away with the same confidence she did to pursue her interests. 

    “I didn’t always think I could go to grad school for physics. I didn’t know if I would be good enough to get in,” she says. “I hope from this conference they can see women who have already achieved that and know they can do it themselves.” 

    The conference was funded by APS, NSF, and the U.S. Department of Energy. Additional support was provided by the UConn Department of Physics; College of Liberal Arts and Sciences; Office of the Provost; the Vice President for Research; College of Engineering; Institute of Materials Science; Ed Eyler and Karen Greer Fund; Mark Miller Fund; City College of New York Physicists William Miller and Myriam Sarachik Memorial Fund; Mirion Technologies; Del Boca family gift; American Astronomical Society; New England Section of APS; and Startorialist Science and Fashion Shop. 

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: At UConn, Equality Starts One Ride at a Time

    Source: US State of Connecticut

    The UConn Accessible Van Service (AVS) is a student-run program within Facilities Operations that has provided free rides around campus for disabled and injured members of the UConn community for over a decade.

    White minivans with “HuskyGo” labels printed on the trunks, shuttle students and faculty all day long.

    “The breadth of folks who use the service range from people who are wheelchair bound permanently to students who twisted their ankle and need help getting around for a week,” says Andy Kelly, associate director of logistics at UConn.

    “The service is important because it kind of sets the standard for equity,” says Ryan Dang ’25 (ENG), student manager and AVS coordinator. “Everybody should be given the same opportunity to go to classes, run their errands and do what they need to do, despite whatever disability that they have.”

    Driving the vans is also an opportunity for student drivers to connect with their peers (George Velky / UConn Photo)

    This semester, there are roughly 400 students and staff who rely on the service. The vans serve the entirety of the UConn Storrs campus and up to one mile off campus. There are 231 pickup and drop-off points, says Dang. An interactive map with all pickup locations is provided via QR code to the passengers so they can pinpoint exactly where the best spot is for their next ride.

    “It provides a significant peace of mind for the folks who use the service, so they don’t have to worry about being able to be full participants in the college experience,” says Kelly.

    There are about 40 employees with the service, the majority of who are students. The program is completely facilitated through student managers Ryan Dang and Nicole Corkery ’25 (CLAS).  Eight full-time employees staffed by WRTD also keep the ship running.

    Student drivers enjoy connecting with their peers on campus.

    “Making sure you greet passengers when they get in the van is big,” says Shealyn Docker ’25 (CLAS), AVS driver. “Just so that they feel comfortable and that they’re welcomed.”

    Docker has been working for AVS for three school years and loves the job. She explained how she has built relationships with many of the passengers, and she looks forward to driving them every day. Docker mentioned one passenger she would drive to and from work. “He always talked to me about his granddaughter and his children, how work is going, and how he’s super grateful that I drive him. I miss him.”

    For many of the passengers, AVS is the primary means of transportation. The service runs from 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. on weekdays, 11 a.m. to 8 p.m. on Saturdays and 11 a.m. to 7 p.m. on Sundays. Drivers understand the importance of their work and are often eager to pick up shifts to make sure each passenger’s accommodation is met.

    Students can find eligibility for the service by connecting with the Center for Students with Disabilities. University staff can contact HR to see if they meet the needs for accommodation.

    For Spring 2025, roughly 400 students and staff rely on the service (George Velky / UConn Photo)

    There are five vans with wheelchair ramps, and the rest do not have wheelchair accessibility. One goal Kelly has for AVS is to upgrade the entire fleet to have ramps. When each van has a ramp, it will put the service in a place to better provide the right level of service for the right people, says Kelly.

    Other qualities that ensure safety and accessibility include strobe lights on vans for visually impaired passengers and backup cameras. Drivers are required to always wear a high-visibility vest and drive with headlights on at all times of day. They are also trained to know the campus like the back of their hand, so they can make the experience for the passengers as seamless as possible.

    “AVS allows people to live where they want on campus and still maintain the same level of presence as any other student,” says Dang. “It makes them feel like any other person on campus. It doesn’t make them feel like an outsider.”

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI: Allegro MicroSystems Appoints Dr. Krishna Palepu to its Board of Directors

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    MANCHESTER, N.H., Feb. 03, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Allegro MicroSystems, Inc. (“Allegro”) (Nasdaq: ALGM) a global leader in power and sensing semiconductor solutions for motion control and energy-efficient systems, today announced the appointment of Krishna Palepu, Ross Graham Walker Professor of Business Administration at Harvard Business School, to Allegro’s Board of Directors (“Board”) as an independent director. Dr. Palepu’s appointment was effective on January 31, 2025. 

    Dr. Palepu brings extensive expertise in strategy, governance, and emerging markets to the Board, as well as experience advising companies in the technology and semiconductor sectors. His academic research focuses on globalization, particularly in India and China, and corporate board effectiveness. He has served on multiple public company boards and is a fellow of the International Academy of Management.

    “I am delighted to welcome Krishna to Allegro’s board of Directors,” said Yoshihiro “Zen” Suzuki, Chairman of the Board. “He brings a unique perspective with his impressive background in academia combined with considerable board and consulting experience in the sectors and markets of focus for the company. Dr. Palepu’s deep understanding of business strategy and global markets positions him perfectly to navigate the complexities of international business. His practical experience complements his research background, bringing valuable insight to the Board as we move towards our next stage of growth.”

    “It is an exciting time to join Allegro’s Board, and I am honored to be appointed,” said Dr. Palepu. “I look forward to working closely with Allegro’s directors and management team and drawing upon my expertise in corporate governance, emerging markets, and global strategy to further enable the company to continue its strong progress.”

    Dr. Palepu holds a master’s degree in Electronics from Andhra University, an MBA-equivalent degree from the Indian Institute of Management, Calcutta, and a Ph.D. in Management from the MIT Sloan School of Management.

    About Allegro MicroSystems

    Allegro MicroSystems, Inc. is leveraging more than three decades of expertise in magnetic sensing and power ICs to propel automotive, clean energy and industrial automation forward with solutions that enhance efficiency, performance and sustainability. Allegro’s commitment to quality drives transformation across industries, reinforcing our status as a pioneer in “automotive grade” technology and a partner in our customers’ success. For additional information, visit www.allegromicro.com.

    Forward-Looking Statements

    This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. We intend such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All statements other than statements of historical facts contained in this press release should be considered forward-looking statements. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms such as “aim,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “exploring,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “could,” “intend,” “target,” “project,” “would,” “contemplate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential,” “seek,” or “continue” or the negative of these terms or other similar words and expressions, although not all forward-looking statements contain these words. No forward-looking statement is a guarantee of future results, performance or achievements, and one should avoid placing undue reliance on such statements.

    Forward-looking statements are based on our management’s current expectations, beliefs and assumptions and on information currently available to us. Such beliefs and assumptions may or may not prove to be correct. Additionally, such forward-looking statements are subject to a number of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions, and actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements due to various factors, including, but not limited to, those identified in Part II, Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 29, 2024, filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on May 23, 2024, which is available at www.sec.gov. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to: downturns or volatility in general economic conditions; our ability to compete effectively, expand our market share and increase our net sales and profitability; our reliance on a limited number of third-party semiconductor wafer fabrication facilities and suppliers of other materials; any failure to adjust purchase commitments and inventory management based on changing market conditions or customer demand; shifts in our product mix, customer mix or channel mix, which could negatively impact our gross margin; the cyclical nature of the semiconductor industry, including the analog segment in which we compete; any downturn or disruption in the automotive market or industry; our ability to successfully integrate the acquisition of other companies or technologies and products into our business; our ability to compensate for decreases in average selling prices of our products and increases in input costs; our ability to manage any sustained yield problems or other delays at our third-party wafer fabrication facilities or in the final assembly and test of our products; our ability to accurately predict our quarterly net sales and operating results and meet the expectations of investors; our dependence on manufacturing operations in the Philippines; our reliance on distributors to generate sales; events beyond our control impacting us, our key suppliers or manufacturing partners; our ability to develop new product features or new products in a timely and cost-effective manner; our ability to manage growth; any slowdown in the growth of our end markets; the loss of one or more significant customers; our ability to meet customers’ quality requirements; uncertainties related to the design win process and our ability to recover design and development expenses and to generate timely or sufficient net sales or margins; changes in government trade policies, including the imposition of export restrictions and tariffs; our exposures to warranty claims, product liability claims and product recalls; our dependence on international customers and operations; the availability of rebates, tax credits and other financial incentives on end-user demands for certain products; risks, liabilities, costs and obligations related to governmental regulations and other legal obligations, including export/trade control, privacy, data protection, information security, cybersecurity, consumer protection, environmental and occupational health and safety, antitrust, anti-corruption and anti-bribery, product safety, environmental protection, employment matters and tax; the volatility of currency exchange rates; our ability to raise capital to support our growth strategy; our indebtedness may limit our flexibility to operate our business; our ability to effectively manage our growth and to retain key and highly skilled personnel; our ability to protect our proprietary technology and inventions through patents or trade secrets; our ability to commercialize our products without infringing third-party intellectual property rights; disruptions or breaches of our information technology systems or confidential information or those of our third-party service providers; our principal stockholder continues to have influence over us; the negative impact any future issuance or sale of our shares may have on the market price of our common stock; anti-takeover provisions in our organizational documents and under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware; any failure to design, implement or maintain effective internal control over financial reporting; changes in tax rates or the adoption of new tax legislation; the negative impacts of sustained inflation on our business; the physical, transition and litigation risks presented by climate change; and other events beyond our control. Moreover, we operate in an evolving environment. New risk factors and uncertainties may emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for management to predict all risk factors and uncertainties.

    You should read this press release with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from what we expect. We qualify all of our forward-looking statements by these cautionary statements. All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this press release, and except as required by applicable law, we do not plan to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements contained herein, whether as a result of any new information, future events, changed circumstances or otherwise.

    Allegro Contact
    Jalene Hoover
    VP of Investor Relations & Corporate Communications
    jhoover@allegromicro.com

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: We must scrap Ofsted say Greens

    Source: Green Party of England and Wales

    Responding to the news that Ofsted is considering a new approach to inspecting education providers and introducing ‘report cards’ for schools, Green Party Education Spokesperson, Vix Lowthion, said:

    “Ofsted isn’t working. For teachers or parents. We’ve seen the toxic impact it can have on teachers and we know it doesn’t serve children. These reforms are too close to the previous failed model. We must instead scrap Ofsted and end the era of forcing teachers into narrowly defined boxes. To replace it we need a collaborative model connecting teachers on the frontline with local experts. By connecting them with specialists in pedagogy, child development and social care we can encourage teacher retention, tailor support to local circumstances and drive much better local and national outcomes.”

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI: CampDoc and Tessitura Announce Partnership and Integration for Arts and Culture Organizations

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    ANN ARBOR, Mich., Feb. 03, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — CampDoc, the leading electronic health record (EHR) system for camps and youth programs, and Tessitura, a nonprofit technology company serving arts and culture organizations, are excited to announce a new partnership and integration designed to streamline operations while improving health and safety.

    This strategic collaboration connects the CampDoc EHR with Tessitura’s powerful CRM and ticketing platform, creating a unified solution. The integration enables seamless data syncing, reducing administrative burdens for performing arts organizations, aquariums, museums, zoos and other cultural organizations that offer youth programs.

    “We’re proud to partner with Tessitura to empower their organizations with tools that make health and safety more accessible,” said Dr. Michael Ambrose, Founder and CEO of CampDoc. “This integration brings peace of mind to families and enables staff to focus on delivering unforgettable experiences, knowing that critical health information is readily available when it’s needed most.”

    Tessitura’s comprehensive CRM platform supports ticketing, fundraising, memberships and more for 800 arts and culture organizations in 10 countries worldwide. CampDoc is a SOC 2 Type 2 and HIPAA-compliant solution already used by many Tessitura organizations. This new integration ensures a seamless experience for teams that employ both solutions.

    “Our collaboration with CampDoc reflects a commitment to connecting our members with leading partner resources that simplify their operations and enhance their customer experience,” said Rebecca Herberson, Vice President of Solutions and Strategic Partnerships at Tessitura. “Together, we’re equipping organizations with the tools needed to deliver both outstanding cultural programs and exceptional care for participants and their families.”

    The CampDoc and Tessitura integration addresses the increasing need for streamlined, secure and user-friendly solutions. Organizations interested in learning more about the integration between CampDoc and Tessitura can visit www.campdoc.com or www.tessitura.com.

    About DocNetwork
    CampDoc and SchoolDoc offer the most comprehensive Electronic Health Record (EHR) solution to help ensure the health and safety of children while they are away from home. DocNetwork is trusted by over 1,250 programs across all 50 states and internationally, including traditional day and residential camps, aquariums, museums, zoos, YMCAs, JCCs, Girl Scouts, Boy Scouts, parks and recreation facilities, colleges and universities, and K-12 public, private, and charter schools. For more information about DocNetwork and web-based health management, please visit www.campdoc.com, www.schooldoc.com, or call 734-619-8300.

    About Tessitura
    Tessitura is a nonprofit technology company dedicated to helping arts and culture organizations thrive. CRM lies at the heart of Tessitura’s mission and secure technology platform. Ticketing and admissions work hand-in-hand with fundraising, membership, marketing, education and front of house. Intuitive reporting and forecasting tools help reduce uncertainty and turn data into insights. And features such as frictionless payments, digital ticketing and integrated e-commerce help build a sustainable and accessible future. Tessitura works with more than 800 organizations in 10 countries. For more information, visit www.tessitura.com.

    Contact:

    For DocNetwork:
    Michael Ambrose, M.D.
    DocNetwork
    734-619-8300
    michael@docnetwork.org

    For Tessitura:
    communications@tessituranetwork.com

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Government sets out plans to target ‘stuck’ schools

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Education Secretary sets out plan for a new era of school standards.

    Stronger accountability, increased intervention in stuck schools and faster school improvement are at the heart of this government’s plan to give every child the best start in life, the Education Secretary has said today.

    Speaking at the Centre for Social Justice, Bridget Phillipson laid out plans for a new era of school standards building on the reforms of successive governments and delivering on the Prime Minister’s Plan for Change – breaking the link between background and success. 

    This includes an excellent teacher for every classroom, a high-quality curriculum for every school and a core offer of excellence for every parent so that every child can achieve and thrive.  

    The Secretary of State announced new plans to tackle forgotten schools as part of proposals for a significantly strengthened school accountability system that works for parents. 

    There are more than 600 ‘stuck’ schools in England that have received consecutive poor Ofsted judgements, and which are attended by more than 300,000 children. Those attending these schools leave primary school with results 14 percentage points worse on average and secondary school with results a grade per subject worse on average.  

    Plans unveiled by the Education Secretary today provide for a stronger, faster system, spearheaded by an initial £20m investment in new regional improvement teams, known as RISE teams which will prioritise these stuck schools. They will draw up bespoke improvement plans with those schools, with government making up to £100,000 available initially to each school for specialist support. This compares to a £6,000 grant that was available previously for similar schools. 

    In her speech, Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson said: 

    Stuck schools are the new front in the fight against low expectations. 

    I will not accept a system that is content for some to sink, even while others soar.  

    The opportunity to succeed must be the right of every child. 

    We simply can’t allow stuck schools to disappear off the radar. 

    The reforms announced today continue the strong accountability already within the education system since the growth of inspection in the 1990s that has improved school standards.

    The government will continue to use structural intervention – converting to an academy, or moving to a new, strong trust – where Ofsted identifies the most serious concern or does not identify rapid improvement. It has also proposed closer monitoring of schools with the most serious problems to track progress. 

    The government expects the number of schools that receive mandatory intervention – including structural and from RISE teams – to be around double than before, securing swift improvement for children and driving high and rising standards in every part of the country.  

    Leora Cruddas, Chief Executive of the Confederation of School Trust, said:

    There is a lot to be proud of about our school system in England. We are a good school system on a journey to great.

    This is because we have built on the evidence of what works – thirty years of curriculum development, teacher development, accountability, structural reform, and innovation. But the school system does not work for all children: the gap between economically disadvantaged pupils and their peers has widened; the system does not serve children with SEND well; and not enough of our children feel like they belong in our schools. Some of our schools are not on a secure improvement trajectory.

    If we are to build a great school system, then we must design it so that all our children achieve and thrive. We are committed to working with government to design a system that is built on excellence, equity, and inclusion.

    Sir Hamid Patel, Chief Executive of Star Academies, said:

    The Government is right to focus on strong and supportive accountability to deliver high standards and expectations. While we take pride in the significant strengths, achievements, and international reputation of our school system, the entrenched disadvantage gap is a national crisis that requires urgent and persistent action from us all.

    The introduction of RISE Teams to support the work of our outstanding school trusts, along with additional funding for tailored school improvement and enhanced monitoring of schools facing serious performance challenges, will contribute to an aspirational system that benefits all children and families.

    Jon Coles, Chief Executive of United Learning, said:

    Turning around schools which are not doing a good enough job for children is a critical priority for our school system. It is therefore good to see the government’s determination to ensure rapid improvement in a larger number of struggling schools while continuing with structural intervention in the weakest schools by using all the resources and capacity available.

    Jason Elsom, Chief Executive of Parentkind said:

    Parents will welcome efforts to make sure that there are high standards in every classroom.

    Schools will be at the centre of significant social change during the decade ahead and we will need a robust, responsive system that not only recognises when schools are excelling but steps in with meaningful support when they struggle.

    When we engage with parents about school inspections, their message is clear: they want a framework that is firm yet fair, one that places the success and well-being of every child at its core and acknowledges the essential role of parents in making this vision a reality.

    Dr Vanessa Ogden, Chief Executive Mulberry Schools, said:

    We see an ambitious plan announced today that invests in the quality assurance, leadership and resources to build on existing success and improve standards for all. Those schools that need it will get the expert challenge and support required to achieve turnaround. Those that already hold this knowledge can help. Working together in this way, we can ensure that every child gets the great school they deserve – and we can reach higher and further than ever in education, for a thriving economy, regional prosperity and fulfilled secure lives.

    Tom Campbell, Chief Executive Office, E-Act, said:

    I welcome the government investment in support for schools who have been left to struggle in recent years.  The RISE teams and their focus on support rather than intervention makes high quality school improvement available to all schools, irrespective of which trust or LA they are in or which geographical region they are based.

    While RISE teams will immediately prioritise stuck schools, the proposals also set out that they will engage with schools that have concerning levels of pupil attainment, including large year-on-year declines.  

    The teams will also work across all schools providing a universal service, signposting to best practice and bringing schools together to share their knowledge and innovation.  

    The measures today come as Ofsted has unveiled the new report cards which they propose will evaluate schools across nine separate areas.  They also set out proposals for evaluating areas from ‘exemplary’ to ‘causing concern’, holding schools to a higher standard and providing far greater information for parents.  

    School report cards will start to be introduced from this autumn.  

    ENDS 

    • RISE teams abbreviated from ‘Regional Improvement for Standards and Excellence’.

    DfE media enquiries

    Central newsdesk – for journalists 020 7783 8300

    Updates to this page

    Published 3 February 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Better protection for victims from domestic abusers

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Victims of domestic abuse will be better protected as part of a new law ensuring even more abusers face tougher management from police and probation.

    • Closer management of offenders convicted of controlling or coercive behaviour

    • Agencies such as Police and Probation will have a legal duty to work

    • Part of the Government’s Plan for Change and mission to halve violence against women and girls

    Offenders convicted of controlling or coercive behaviour, and sentenced to 12 months or longer, will now be automatically managed under multi-agency public protection arrangements. This means agencies are legally required to cooperate to better manage the risks posed by these serious offenders, recognising the significant harm this kind of offending can cause.  

    For the first time, it puts controlling or coercive behaviour on a par with other domestic abuse offences including threats to kill, attempted strangulation and stalking.

    Evidence shows offenders who are managed under multi-agency public protection arrangements have a reoffending rate less than half of the national average

    The law change means even more domestic abusers will fall under this management, in which agencies are legally required to share any information which indicates increased risk to others, such as former partners or members of the public.

    This is part of the Government’s Plan for Change to take back our streets by protecting women and girls from harassment, aggression and violence and manifesto commitment to target the most prolific and harmful perpetrators using methods previously reserved for terrorist and other violent offenders.

     Minister for Prisons and Probation, Lord James Timpson said:

    Domestic abuse creates fear and isolation, and I will do everything in my power to tackle it and ensure women and girls feel safe in their homes.

    This new approach will put controlling or coercive behaviour on a par with physical violence and will help prevent these despicable crimes.

    Minister for Safeguarding and Violence Against Women and Girls, Jess Philips said:

    Domestic abuse devastates lives and affects more than two million people every year.

    For the first time, under this change to the law, coercive or controlling behaviour is being placed where it belongs – on a par with serious violent offending. This is an important step to recognise the harm caused by all forms of domestic abuse, ensure the most harmful offenders are managed in the right way, and ultimately keep victims safe.

    This Government will crack on with our work to deliver a system that protects victims, supports their journey to justice and holds perpetrators to account – part of our mission under the Plan for Change to halve violence against women and girls in a decade.

    The law change will apply to all offenders who are sentenced to at least 12 months’ imprisonment, including suspended sentences, or given a hospital order for an offence of controlling or coercive behaviour in an intimate or family relationship.

    It was introduced by the Victims and Prisoners Act 2024 and was signed into law after Justice Minister Lord Timpson signed a statutory instrument early this year.

    Previously, those convicted of controlling or coercive behaviour could be actively managed under multi-agency arrangements on a discretionary basis only.

    This measure will put beyond doubt the legal requirement for agencies to work together to assess and manage the risks posed by this group of offenders.

    Chief Executive of Women’s Aid, Farah Nazeer, said:

    Coercive control is a key tool used by perpetrators of domestic abuse, as it isolates survivors and makes them dependent on an abuser.

    Women’s Aid welcomes plans to treat coercive and controlling behaviours seriously, automatically managing those convicted of this form of abuse under the Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangement (MAPPA).

    It is essential that specialist domestic abuse services, with expertise on abusive behaviours and the impacts on victims and survivors, are routinely included in the MAPPA process if survivors are to be properly protected by this measure.

    This announcement builds on measures already set out by the Government as part of our mission to halve violence against women and girls. This includes launching new Domestic Abuse Protection Orders in select areas to ensure victims of all types of domestic abuse including coercive control, stalking, and violence can seek protection and more abusers face harsher restrictions. 

    Further information:

    • Multi-agency public protection arrangements, known as MAPPA, are the set of arrangements through which the Police, Probation and Prison Services work together with other agencies to manage the risks posed by violent, sexual and terrorist offenders living in the community to protect the public.
    • Research conducted by Anglia Ruskin University indicates that reoffending rates for individuals managed under MAPPA are less than half of the national average. The one-year reoffending rate for MAPPA is 12.2%, while the national overall one-year reoffending rates range between 30.0% and 31.3% during a similar timeframe.

    Updates to this page

    Published 3 February 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Eight new members appointed to the Council for Science and Technology

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Eight new members have been appointed to the Council that advises the Prime Minister and Cabinet on science and technology.

    Images of the eight new Council members.

    Eight new members have been appointed to the Council for Science and Technology (CST). The Council advises the Prime Minister and the Cabinet on strategic science and technology policy issues that cut across the responsibilities of individual government departments. 

    Professor Dame Angela McLean, the Government Chief Scientific Adviser and Co-Chair of  CST,  said: 

    The eight new members bring extraordinary breadth and depth of experience: from AI and data to chemical engineering and venture capital. I am confident that new members will further invigorate the Council and its ability to provide robust advice on the government’s high-level priorities for science and technology. I look forward to collaborating across a wide range of topics to further embed specialist knowledge of the UK’s strength in science and technology into the heart of government decision-making.

    New members: 

    • Mark Enzer OBE is a Strategic Advisor at Mott MacDonald. He is a Visiting Professor at the University of Cambridge and Imperial College London. 

    • Professor Dame Lynn Gladden DBE is Shell Professor of Chemical Engineering at the University of Cambridge, and former Executive-Chair of the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council. 

    • Priya Lakhani OBE is Founder CEO of CENTURY Tech. She co-founded the Institute for Ethical AI in education. 

    • Avid Larizadeh Duggan OBE is a Senior Managing Director, Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan, Teachers’ Venture Growth. She is a Non-Executive Director on the board of Barclays Bank UK.

    • Professor (Emeritus) Nick McKeown is Senior Fellow at Intel Corporation, Professor (Emeritus) of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at Stanford University and Visiting Professor of Engineering and Senior Research Fellow at Oxford University. 

    • Professor Sir Nigel Richard Shadbolt is Professor of Computer Science at the University of Oxford and Principal of Jesus College, Oxford. He is Co-Founder and Chair of the Open Data Institute. 

    • Richard Slater is Chief R&D Officer for Unilever. He was previously Senior Vice President R&D, GSK Consumer Healthcare. He is a Non-Executive Director at Future Origins. 

    • Paul Taylor CBE is Director of Morgan Stanley International, Chair of Interrupt Labs Ltd and Chair of Beyond Blue. He is a Non-Executive Director on the Defence Technology and Innovation Board at the Ministry of Defence.  

    See more details on CST and its members.

    Updates to this page

    Published 3 February 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI Russia: HSE University Opens Dual Degree Master’s Program with Chinese University RIEM SWUFE

    Translartion. Region: Russians Fedetion –

    Source: State University Higher School of Economics – State University Higher School of Economics –

    In January 2025, HSE and Southwestern University of Finance and Economics (SWUFE) signed a cooperation agreement to implement a dual degree master’s program within the Financial Economics program at ICEF and the Master’s in Finance program at SWUFE. This program will allow students to gain a unique educational experience in two countries, combining the best educational traditions of Russia and China. ICEF’s counterpart is the Research Institute of Economics and Management (RIEM), established at SWUFE in 2006 to implement research and educational programs in economics and finance at a high international level.

    ICEF delegation at Southwestern University of Finance and Economics (SWUFE) in Chengdu, China, in October 2024. During the meetings, an agreement was reached to establish the ICEF–RIEM Dual Degree Master’s Program.

    © MIEF

    Features of the program

    The program is based on the principle of mirror mobility: students study for 1-1.5 years in China at RIEM SWUFE and for 1-1.5 years in Russia at ICEF HSE. During their studies, students will gain in-depth knowledge in economics, finance, and data analysis, and will also study the economic and cultural characteristics of both countries.

    To participate in the program, you must successfully complete the first year at your home university and be selected for the double degree program. In the second year, students will study at the partner university and then return to their home university to complete their studies. Master’s theses will be defended separately at each of the universities.

    The programme will be taught in English and will include courses in micro- and macroeconomics, asset valuation and corporate finance. Each university will offer its own unique emphasis: RIEM will focus on the Chinese economy and financial system, and ICEF on quantitative and applied finance and data analysis.

    Upon completion of the program, graduates will receive two diplomas: a Master’s degree from the National Research University Higher School of Economics in Economics and a SWUFE diploma in Economics (specialization in Finance).

    Dean of the Research Institute of Economics and Management RIEM, Professor Yan Dong (graduated with a Master’s degree from the London School of Economics, UK, and received a PhD from the University of Essex, UK) about RIEM:

    “Our institute is very special. From the name, it seems that we are a research institute, but in fact, we are an educational unit. We have about 1,000 undergraduate, graduate and doctoral students. Our institute is special because all of our teachers have obtained their PhD degrees abroad. We have graduates from universities in the United States, Europe, Asia and other countries. All of our teachers are fluent in English, and the language of instruction – the working language in our institute – is English. We have more than 100 foreign students studying at our institute. This is what makes our institute special – it is quite an internationalized institution, and we have teachers who do not speak Chinese at all – they are international specialists.”

    Academic Director of the ICEF Master’s Program “Financial Economics” Maxim Nikitin:

    “Since the creation of the Financial Economics program, its main feature has been its international format. We have sought to integrate international standards and practices into the educational process. Cooperation with one of China’s leading universities in the field of finance, such as SWUFE, is an important step in this direction and expands the geography of our educational interaction. We are pleased that this initiative is based on the principle of equal exchange, which will enrich the programs of both partners, and will also create a new platform for academic exchange and joint projects. We are confident that this partnership will provide our students with access to unique knowledge and skills that will be in demand in the global labor market.”

    Earlier in 2024, HSE ICEF and RIEM SWUFE launched Bachelor’s double degree program in economics and financeCurrently, the first cohort of 2nd year students of ICEF is already successfully studying at SWUFE under this program.

    Graduates of the program will receive a bachelor’s degree in economics from the National Research University Higher School of Economics and a bachelor’s degree in economics from SWUFE.

    Academic Director of the ICEF Bachelor’s Program Oleg Zamkov:

    “ICEF HSE and RIEM SWUFE are a very good match for each other in implementing dual degree programs due to the close financial and economic focus of the programs and the level of updating of the courses. All economic and financial subjects required for ICEF students are also available at SWUFE, and, conversely, ICEF has everything required for students of the partner university.”

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Yellowstone National Park: Where geology is on display nearly everywhere!

    Source: US Geological Survey

    Yellowstone Caldera Chronicles is a weekly column written by scientists and collaborators of the Yellowstone Volcano Observatory. This week’s contribution is from Richard Tollo, emeritus Professor of Geology at George Washington University.

    Yellowstone caldera viewed from Mount Washburn.  The caldera is the low-lying area extending from the foothills of Mount Washburn in the foreground to the rugged mountains on the horizon. The incised valley of the Yellowstone River stretches from left to right in the middle distance.  Steep valley walls are illuminated by sunlight in the center.  Mount Washburn is a remnant andesitic volcano of the Eocene Absaroka Range.  The hike along the access road to the summit (where this photograph was taken) presents many opportunities to observe lavas and volcanogenic sedimentary deposits.  This geologically rich hike is an excellent field trip in itself.  Photo by Richard Tollo, George Washington University, August 8, 2009.

    Yellowstone National Park ranks among the finest classrooms in North America for learning geology through outdoor field trips.  This distinction results from a unique combination of geological events and characteristics developed especially throughout the past 2.1 million years.  Most of the major geological units can be visited in a day by taking a drive along the iconic Grand Loop Road and offshoots, bolstered by short hikes along well-maintained trails that are accessible from these roadways.

    The primary geologic feature of Yellowstone National Park is perhaps that which is most difficult to observe in its entirety: that is, Yellowstone Caldera, a volcanic collapse feature that formed as a result of a major explosive eruption 631,000 years ago.  Two similar calderas formed as a result of comparable eruptions that took place about 1.3 and 2.1 million years ago.  Because each caldera is centered over an associated magma reservoir, pyroclastic deposits and lava flows are in close proximity to one another within or close to the caldera.  This geological concentration results in a dazzling array of closely spaced features that support productive field trips and produce many opportunities for geological education. 

    Moreover, as visitors arriving from mostly lower elevations in the eastern, central, and southern United States rapidly discover as they find themselves short of breath while hiking, the Yellowstone region is an elevated plateau, with an average elevation of 8,000 ft (2,400 m).  The high elevation is caused by uplift due to its location atop a zone of mantle upwelling (hotspot) that transports mantle heat to the overlying crust and causes upward expansion.  As a result, nearly all streams in the headwaters of the Yellowstone River actively erode their channels, forming deeply incised valleys with steep canyon walls where rocks are exposed, providing unmatched three-dimensional views of the geology.  In this way, river erosion and tectonic uplift make a powerful combination acting to produce numerous and invariably instructive geological exposures throughout the park.

    Lower Falls and Grand Canyon of the Yellowstone River.  The river here is eroding young, post-caldera rhyolite that was softened by hydrothermal alteration.  The V shape of the canyon indicates that the river is actively eroding in response to regional uplift.  Photo by Richard Tollo, George Washington University, August 12, 2008.

    The presence of roadways—especially the Grand Loop Road—provide benefits for field trips beyond facilitating transportation because construction involved the creation of roadcuts.  These cuts often expose bedrock, furnishing insightful views of primary geological features that might otherwise be altered or destroyed by erosion or chemical alteration.  Roadcuts have the added advantage of providing access to fresh, relatively less weathered rock, which is useful for collecting samples for laboratory studies, such as geochemical, paleomagnetic, and geochronologic investigations.

    Construction projects support field trips in the Yellowstone area in other ways. A case in point is Grassy Lake Dam, which was built in the 1930s to impound local stream flow to create Grassy Lake Reservoir located just south of Yellowstone National Park.  A quarry that was excavated close to the eventual dam site provided rocks for use in the project.  The quarry, located less than 200 m (650 ft) south of the southern boundary of Yellowstone National Park, was developed in the Lava Creek Tuff (the welded ash unit that formed during the eruption that created Yellowstone Caldera) and provides considerable information regarding the genesis of that important eruptive formation that is not available elsewhere.  For example, the columnar-jointed tuff at the quarry site is hard and glassy, unlike parts of the same unit exposed elsewhere in the Yellowstone region. Such textures and field characteristics suggest that ash accumulated at relatively high temperatures, in agreement with insights from another nearby but different unit of the Lava Creek Tuff.  This interpretation, which in turn implies thar some silicic magmas at Yellowstone were unusually hot, might not be reached without the information provided by this locality. 

    Roadcut in light pink ash-flow deposits of the Lava Creek Tuff on Grand Loop Road near Tuff Cliff.  The color and closely spaced jointing are characteristic of the Lava Creek Tuff map unit.  The steep faces and dense nature of the roadcut exposures indicate that a moderate degree of welding occurred and has not been subsequently modified by hydrothermal alteration.  Photo by Richard Tollo, George Washington University, August 13, 2008.

    Field trips allow geologists to share their findings with a broad audience, and also to educate the next generation of geoscientists in both Earth’s history and how to conduct geological investigations.  Field trips at Yellowstone are especially productive because of the many types of exposures—each with a story to tell.  Sharing knowledge among scientists and between geologists and the public is a bountiful way to augment our collective understanding of how the Earth works, and how Yellowstone came to be a geologic Wonderland.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: The Polytechnic University held a refresher course on the topic “RISC-V Ecosystem”

    Translartion. Region: Russians Fedetion –

    Source: Peter the Great St Petersburg Polytechnic University – Peter the Great St Petersburg Polytechnic University –

    At the end of January, the Higher School of Electronics and Microsystems Engineering of the Institute of Electronics and Telecommunications of SPbPU held a unique advanced training course on the topic “RISC-V Ecosystem: Development and System Programming”.

    The course was devoted to the development of hardware and software for modern extensible open instruction sets and RISC-V processor architectures, which are widely used in rapidly developing areas of information technology, including the Internet of Things and artificial intelligence.

    The course instructors were practicing specialists from SPbPU, ETU “LETI”, SPbSU, MIET, MIEM, UNN with extensive experience in this field, which ensured a high level of training and relevant knowledge for the participants. The audience included representatives of enterprises and universities from St. Petersburg, Moscow, Nizhny Novgorod, Saratov, Voronezh, Krasnoyarsk, Yekaterinburg (more than 10 organizations in total). Classes continued in an intensive mode throughout the week, on the final day, Dmitry Tikhonov, Vice-Rector for Continuing and Pre-University Education at SPbPU, presented the course participants with certificates of advanced training.

    The hardware for the course was deployed and installed with the support of the YADRO group of companies at the joint scientific laboratory “RISC-V Digital Technologies (YADRO-Polytech)”.

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Video: Ethics Rules for Federal Advisory Committee Members

    Source: United States of America – Federal Government Departments (video statements)

    Federal Advisory Committees provide important recommendations concerning science, international trade, farming, nutrition, and other significant matters. If you are serving on a Federal Advisory Committee, you need to know the applicable ethics rules to maintain the public’s trust in the important work of your committee. To assist advisory committee members across the Executive Branch, the USDA Office of Ethics is making this video publicly available on YouTube. If you are a USDA employee or are a member of a USDA Advisory Committee and you have any ethics questions, please don’t hesitate to contact the USDA Office of Ethics at: https://www.ethics.usda.gov. Also, be sure to download the innovative, and free, USDA Ethics App by searching “USDA Ethics” on any smart phone, and play the new inter-active USDA-NASA Lunar Greenhouse Ethics Learning Game (available on USDA’s Ethics webpage at www.usda.gov/ethics).

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9xzJWhVByMs

    MIL OSI Video

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Whether Biden Or Trump, US’ Latin American Policy Will Be Contemptible

    Source: Council on Hemispheric Affairs –

    By John Perry and Roger D. Harris

    Migration, Drugs, and Tariffs.

    With Donald Trump as the new US president, pundits are speculating about how US policy towards Latin America might change.

    In this article, we look at some of the speculation, then address three specific instances of how the US’s policy priorities may be viewed from a progressive, Latin American perspective. This leads us to a wider argument: that the way these issues are dealt with is symptomatic of Washington’s paramount objective of sustaining the US’s hegemonic position. In this overriding preoccupation, its policy towards Latin America is only one element, of course, but always of significance because the US hegemon still treats the region as its “backyard.”

    First, some examples of what the pundits are saying. In Foreign Affairs, Brian Winter argues that Trump’s return signals a shift away from Biden’s neglect of the region. “The reason is straightforward,” he says. “Trump’s top domestic priorities of cracking down on unauthorized immigration, stopping the smuggling of fentanyl and other illicit drugs, and reducing the influx of Chinese goods into the United States all depend heavily on policy toward Latin America.”

    Ryan Berg, who is with the thinktank, Center for Strategic and International Studies, funded by the US defense industry, is also hopeful. Trump will “focus U.S. policy more intently on the Western Hemisphere,” he argues, “and in so doing, also shore up its own security and prosperity at home.”

    According to blogger James Bosworth, Biden’s “benign neglect” could be replaced by an “aggressive Monroe Doctrine – deportations, tariff wars, militaristic security policies, demands of fealty towards the US, and a rejection of China.” However, notwithstanding the attention of Trump’s Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, Bosworth thinks there is still a good chance of policy lapsing into benign neglect as the new administration focuses elsewhere.

    The wrong end of the telescope

    What these and similar analyses share is a concern with problems of importance to the US, including domestic ones, and how they might be tackled by shifts in policy towards Latin America. They view the region from the end of a US-mounted telescope.

    Trump’s approach may be the more brazen “America first!,” but the basic stance is much the same as these pundits. The different scenarios will be worked out in Washington, with Latin America’s future seen as shaped by how it handles US policy changes over which it has little influence. Analyses by these supposed experts are constrained by their adopting the same one-dimensional perspective as Washington’s, instead of questioning it.

    Here’s one example. The word “neglect” is superficial because it hides the immense involvement of the US in Latin America even when it is “neglecting” it: from deep commercial ties to a massive military presence. It is also superficial because, in a real sense, the US constantly neglects the problems that concern most Latin Americans: low wages, inequality, being safe in the streets, the damaging effects of climate change, and many more. “Neglect” would be seen very differently on the streets of a Latin American city than it is inside the Washington beltway.

    Who has the “drug problem”?

    The vacuum in US thinking is nowhere more apparent than in responses to the drug problem. Trump threatens to declare Mexican drug cartels to be terrorist organizations and to invade Mexico to attack them.

    But, as academic Carlos Pérez-Ricart told El Pais: “This is a problem that does not originate in Mexico. The source, the demand, and the vectors are not Mexican. It is them.” Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum also points out that it is consumption in the US that drives drug production and trafficking in Mexico.

    Trump could easily make the same mistake as his predecessor Clinton did two decades ago. Back then, billions were poured into “Plan Colombia” but still failed to solve the “drug problem,” while vastly augmenting violence and human rights violations in the target country.

    A foretaste of what might happen, if Trump carries out his threat, occurred last July, when Biden’s administration captured Ismael “El Mayo” Zambada. That caused an all-out war between cartels in the Mexican state of Sinaloa.

    Sheinbaum rightly turns questions about drug production and consumption back onto the US. Rhetorically, she asks: “Do you believe that fentanyl is not manufactured in the United States?…. Where are the drug cartels in the United States that distribute fentanyl in US cities? Where does the money from the sale of that fentanyl go in the United States?”

    If Trump launches a war on cartels, he will not be the first US president to the treat drug consumption as a foreign issue rather than a concomitantly domestic one.

    Where does the “migration problem” originate?

    Trump is also not the first president to be obsessed by migration. Like drugs, it is seen as a problem to be solved by the countries where the migrants originate, while both the “push” and “pull” factors under US control receive less attention.

    Exploitation of migrant labor, complex asylum procedures, and schemes such as “humanitarian parole” to encourage migration are downplayed as reasons. Biden intensified US sanctions on various Latin American countries, which have been shown conclusively to provoke massive emigration. Meanwhile Trump threatens to do the same.

    Many Latin American countries have been made unsafe by crime linked to drugs or other problems in which the US is implicated. About 392,000 Mexicans were displaced as a result of conflict in 2023 alone, their problem aggravated by the massive, often illegal, export of firearms from the US to Mexico.

    Costa Rica, historically a safe country, had a record 880 homicides in 2023, many of which were related to drug trafficking. In Brazil and other countries, US-trained security forces contribute directly to the violence, rather than reducing it.

    Mass deportations from the US, promised by Trump, could worsen these problems, as happened in El Salvador in the late 1990s. They would also affect remittances sent home by migrant workers, exacerbating regional poverty. The threatened use of tariffs on exports to the US could also have serious consequences if Latin America does not stand up to Trump’s threats. Economist Michael Hudson argues that countries will have to jointly retaliate by refusing to pay dollar-based debts to bond holders if export earnings from the US are summarily cut.

    China in the US “backyard”

    Trump also joins the Washington consensus in its preoccupation with China’s influence in Latin America. Monica de Bolle is with the Peterson Institute for International Economics, a thinktank partly funded by Pentagon contractors. She told the BBC: “You have got the backyard of America engaging directly with China. That’s going to be problematic.”

    Recently retired US Southern Command general, Laura Richardson, was probably the most senior frequent visitor on Washington’s behalf to Latin American capitals, during the Biden administration. She accused China of “playing the ‘long game’ with its development of dual-use sites and facilities throughout the region, “adding that those sites could serve as “points of future multi-domain access for the PLA [People’s Liberation Army] and strategic naval chokepoints.”

    As Foreign Affairs points out, Latin America’s trade with China has “exploded” from $18 billion in 2002 to $480 billion in 2023. China is also investing in huge infrastructure projects, and seemingly its only political condition is a preference for a country to recognize China diplomatically (not Taiwan). Even here, China is not absolute as with Guatemala, Haiti, and Paraguay, which still recognize Taiwan. China still has direct investments in those holdouts, though relatively more modest than with regional countries that fully embrace its one-China policy.

    Peru, currently a close US ally, has a new, Chinese-funded megaport at Chancay, opened in November by President Xi Jinping himself. Even right-wing Argentinian president Milei said of China, “They do not demand anything [in return].”

    What does the US offer instead? While Antony Blinken proudly displayed old railcars that were gifted to Peru, the reality is that most US “aid” to Latin America is either aimed at “promoting democracy” (i.e. Washington’s political agenda) or is conditional or exploitative in other ways.

    The BBC cites “seasoned observers” who believe that Washington is paying the price for “years of indifference” towards the region’s needs. Where the US sees a loss of strategic influence to China and to a lesser extent to Russia, Iran, and others, Latin American countries see opportunities for development and economic progress.

    Remember the Monroe Doctrine

    Those calling for a more “benign” policy are forgetting that, in the two centuries since President James Monroe announced the “doctrine,” later given his name, US policy towards Latin America has been aggressively self-interested.

    Its troops have intervened thousands of times in the region and have occupied its countries on numerous occasions. Just since World War II, there have been around 50 significant interventions or coup attempts, beginning with Guatemala in 1954. The US has 76 military bases across the region, while other major powers like China and Russia have none.

    The doctrine is very much alive. In Foreign Affairs, Brian Winter warns: “Many Republicans perceive these linkages [with China], and the growing Chinese presence in Latin America more broadly, as unacceptable violations of the Monroe Doctrine, the 201-year-old edict that the Western Hemisphere should be free of interference from outside powers.”

    Bosworth adds that Trump wants Latin America to decisively choose a side in the US vs China scrimmage, not merely underplay the role of China in the hemisphere. Any country courting Trump, he suggests, “needs to show some anti-China vibes.”

    Will Freeman is with the Council on Foreign Relations, whose major sponsors are also Pentagon contractors. He thinks that a new Monroe Doctrine and what he calls Trump’s “hardball” diplomacy may partially work, but only with northern Latin America countries, which are more dependent on US trade and other links.

    Trump has two imperatives: while one is stifling China’s influence (e.g. by taking possession of the Panama Canal), another is gaining control of mineral resources (a reason for his wanting to acquire Greenland). The desire for mineral resources is not new, either. General Richardson gave an interview in 2023 to another defense-industry-funded thinktank in which she strongly insinuated that Latin American minerals rightly belong to the US.

    Maintaining hegemonic power against the threat of multipolarity

    Neoconservative Charles Krauthammer, writing 20 years ago for yet another thinktank funded by the  defense industry, openly endorsed the US’s status as the dominant hegemonic power and decried multilateralism, at least when not in US interests. “Multipolarity, yes, when there is no alternative,” he said. “But not when there is. Not when we have the unique imbalance of power that we enjoy today.”

    Norwegian commentator Glen Diesen, writing in 2024, contends that the US is still fighting a battle – although perhaps now a losing one – against multipolarity and to retain its predominant status. Trump’s “America first!” is merely a more blatant expression of sentiments held by his other presidential predecessors for clinging on to Washington’s contested hegemony.

    The irony of Biden’s presidency was that his pursuit of the Ukraine war has led to warmer relations between his two rivals, Russia and China. In this context, the growth of BRICS has been fostered – an explicitly multipolar, non-hegemonic partnership. As Glen Diesen says, “The war intensified the global decoupling from the West.”

    Other steps to maintain US hegemony – its support for Israel’s genocide in Gaza, the regime-change operation in Syria and the breakdown of order in Haiti – suggest that, in Washington’s view, according to Diesen, “chaos is the only alternative to US global dominance.” Time and again, Yankee “beneficence” has meant ruination, not development.

    These have further strengthened desires in the global south for alternatives to US dominance, not least in Latin America. Many of its countries (especially those vulnerable to tightening US sanctions) now want to follow the alternative of BRICS.

    Unsurprisingly, Trump has been highly critical of this perceived erosion of hegemonic power on Biden’s watch. Thomas Fazi argues in UnHerd that this is realism on Trump’s part; he knows the Ukraine war cannot be conclusively won, and that China’s power is difficult to contain. Accordingly, this is leading to a “recalibrating of US priorities toward a more manageable ‘continental’ strategy — a new Monroe Doctrine — aimed at reasserting full hegemony over what it deems to be its natural sphere of influence, the Americas and the northern Atlantic,” stretching from Greenland and the Arctic to Tierra del Fuego and Antarctica.

    The pundits may not agree on quite what Trump’s approach towards Latin America will be, but they concur with Winter’s judgment that the region “is about to become a priority for US foreign policy.” His appointment of Marco Rubio is a signal of this. The new secretary of state is a hawk, just like Blinken, but one with a dangerous focus on Latin America.

    However, the mere fact that such pundits hark back to the Monroe Doctrine indicates that this is only, so to speak, old wine in new bottles. Even in the recent past, an aggressive application of the 201-year-old Monroe Doctrine has never seen a hiatus.

    Recall US-backed coups that deposed Honduran President Manuel Zelaya (2009) and Bolivian Evo Morales (2019), plus the failed coup against Daniel Ortega in Nicaragua (2018), along with the parliamentary coup that ousted Paraguayan Fernando Lugo (2012). To these, US-backed regime change by “lawfare” included Dilma Rousseff in Brazil (2016) and Pedro Castillo in Peru (2023). Currently presidential elections have simply been suspended in Haiti and Peru with US backing.

    Even if Trump is more blatant than his predecessors in making clear that his policymaking is based entirely on what he perceives to be US interests, rather than those of Latin Americans, this is not new.

    As commentator Caitlin Johnstone points out, the main difference between Trump and his predecessors is that he “makes the US empire much more transparent and unhidden.” From the other end of the political spectrum, a former John McCain adviser echoes the same assessment: “there will likely be far more continuity between the two administrations than meets the eye.”

    Regardless, Latin America will continue to struggle to set its own destiny, patchily and with setbacks, and this will likely draw it away from the hegemon, whatever the US does.

    Nicaragua-based John Perry is with the Nicaragua Solidarity Coalition and writes for the London Review of Books, FAIR, and CovertAction.

    Roger D. Harris is with the Task Force on the Americas, the US Peace Council, and the Venezuela Solidarity Network

    Featured image courtesy of Cornell University/Wikimedia Commons

    First published by Popular Resistance: https://popularresistance.org/whether-biden-or-trump-us-latin-american-policy-will-still-be-contemptible/

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Polytechnic students reach semi-finals of XI All-Russian engineering competition

    Translartion. Region: Russians Fedetion –

    Source: Peter the Great St Petersburg Polytechnic University – Peter the Great St Petersburg Polytechnic University –

    The selection round of the XI All-Russian Engineering Competition has ended. Experts evaluated over 12,000 projects and scientific research. 751 graduates from universities across the country, including SPbPU, reached the semi-finals. The All-Russian Engineering Competition is an annual intellectual competition that has been held since 2014. The organizer is the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation. The operator of the competition is the National Research Nuclear University MEPhI.

    The objectives of the competition are to develop the human resources potential of high-tech industries, to attract young people to solve promising production, technical, and economic problems of strategic importance for the development of Russian industry, and to improve the quality of engineering education by creating tools for interaction between engineering educational organizations and high-tech enterprises in the real sector of the economy.

    Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University will be represented in the semi-final of VIK 24/25 by 11 students, including 5 master’s students from the Advanced Engineering School of SPbPU “Digital Engineering”:

    Alena Aquentieva, student of the Higher Engineering and Economic School of IPMEIT SPBPU. The theme of the project “Financial pyramids, modern methods of fraud: analysis and measures to reduce them”, the direction of the competition “Countering technogenic, biogenic, sociocultural threats, terrorism and extremist ideology, destructive foreign information and psychological impact, as well as cyberosis and other danger to society , economics and state ”;
    Anna Gaina, student of the Higher School of Management of Cyber-Physical Systems of the ICNK SPBPU. The theme of the project “Universal system of temperature control of laser radiation parameters during hardening steel”, the direction of the competition “Intellectual transport, energy and telecommunication systems”;
    Iona Gesin, student of the advanced engineering school of SPBPU “Digital Engineering”. The theme of the project “Study of the behavior of through cracks in elastic-high bodies”, the direction of the contest “Advanced digital technologies for designing and creating high-tech products”;
    Natalia Grozova, student of the advanced engineering school of SPBPU “Digital Engineering”. The theme of the project “Development of radiation -resistant polymer composite materials to protect solar elements”, the direction of the competition “New materials, chemical compounds and design methods;
    Ilya Ermilov, student of the advanced engineering school of St. Petersburg State University “Digital Engineering”. The theme of the project “Development of a virtual test stand for validation of the model of compositional material under the action of centrifugal force”, the direction of the contest “Advanced digital technologies for designing and creating high -tech products”;
    Ekaterina Isupova, student of the Higher School of Applied Physics and Space Technologies IEIT SPBPU. The theme of the project “Universal temperature control system for high -precision measurements in frequency standards”, the direction of the competition “Advanced digital design and creation of high -tech products”;
    Julia Kolesnikova, student of the Higher Engineering and Economic School of IPMEIT SPBPU. The theme of the project “Using new technologies for illegal purposes”, the direction of the competition “Combating technogenic, biogenic, sociocultural threats, terrorism and extremist ideology, destructive foreign information and psychological impact, as well as cyberosis and other danger to society, economy and state”;
    Nikita Piskun, a student of the advanced engineering school of St. Petersburg State University “Digital Engineering”. The theme of the project “Synthesis of non -linear models of reduced order based on the method of final elements in the tasks of rotary dynamics”, the direction of the contest “Advanced digital design technologies and the creation of high -tech products”;
    Elena Porfiryeva, student of the Higher School of Management of Cyber-Physical Systems of the ICNK SPBPU. The theme of the project “A new non -invasive method for determining the coefficients in ESCCO technology for the reliable diagnosis of the patient’s heart release in real time”, the direction of the “High -tech healthcare contest and health technology, including the rational use of drugs (primarily antibacterial) and the use of genetic data and technologies” ;
    Yana Sprygina, student of the advanced engineering school of SPBPU “Digital Engineering”. The theme of the project “Development and training of a prototype of the language model to adapt the requirements in the machine-readable IDS format (Information Delivery Specification)”, the direction of the “Tim-modeling in construction” contest;
    Lina Sycheva, student of the Higher School of Management of Cyber-Physical Systems of the ICNK SPBPU. The theme of the project “Automatic management system of a special climatic camera”, the direction of the contest “Advanced digital technologies for designing and creating high -tech products”.

    The development of modern protective coatings for solar cells used in the space industry is an important problem in the field of materials science. Glass coatings currently used have significant drawbacks. A promising direction is the use of polymer and composite materials that are highly flexible, low density and have excellent optical characteristics. The key challenge remains increasing the resistance of such materials to radiation, which requires the creation of fundamentally new composite materials. This is the task that was set during the project. Thanks to the equipment laboratories “Polymer composite materials”, as well as the competencies of the project curator, research fellow of the laboratory “Modeling of technological processes and design of power equipment” of the SPbPU PISh “Digital Engineering” Elizaveta Bobrynina, I managed to develop and test the technology for obtaining optically transparent composite materials based on thermoplastic polyurethane and glass flakes to protect solar cells, – shared 2nd year master’s student of the SPbPU PISh Natalia Grozova.

    I submitted a project for the All-Russian engineering competition, “Development of a virtual test bench for validation of a composite material model under centrifugal force”, prepared in the interests of the industrial partner of the SPbPU PIS “Digital Engineering”, CentroTech-Engineering LLC, under the supervision of the curator, associate professor of the Higher School of Advanced Digital Technologies of the SPbPU PIS Ilya Keresten and scientific consultant, engineer of the power engineering department of the SPbPU PIS “Digital Engineering” Daria Ozhgibesova. The goal of the work is to create a VIS for conducting virtual tests, which will allow obtaining a degradation curve of the mechanical properties of the material based on experimental data of structurally similar samples. The result of the work is necessary to obtain a highly accurate digital model of the material required for the calculation justification of the design elements of high-speed rotor systems, and the modeling technique will reduce the number of tests of prototypes of new design solutions, said Ilya Ermilov, a second-year master’s student at the Digital Engineering School.

    On February 1, an extensive business program started for the participants: in-person events for the semi-finalists will be organized together with the competition’s partner employers, including career consultations, trainings and master classes aimed at developing professional skills, as well as effective planning of work on engineering projects. The semi-final will include a “Job Auction” – a competition in which participants will be able to compete for the best offers from leading employers.

    The final of the competition will be held in the format of defending final and scientific qualification works before state examination (expert) commissions headed by the top officials of high-tech corporations. Based on the results of the defenses, the winners and prize-winners of VIK 24/25 will be determined.

    The best participants will be able to receive exclusive job offers, cash prizes from Rosatom State Corporation, a trip to the cosmodrome from Roscosmos State Corporation and advantages when entering the next level of education. Winners and prize winners will be included in the state information resource about individuals who have demonstrated outstanding abilities of the Talent and Success educational foundation.

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: Harnessing Yuva Shakti for Viksit Bharat

    Source: Government of India

    Posted On: 03 FEB 2025 1:41PM by PIB Delhi

    In order to harness the potential and to optimally tap constructive and creative energies of the youth, the Department of Youth Affairs pursues the twin objectives of personality-building and nation-building, that is, developing the personality of youth and involving them in various nation-building activities through its field organizations and various schemes.

    National Service Scheme (NSS) is engaged in developing the personality and character of the student youth through voluntary community service. ‘Education through Service’ is the purpose of the NSS.

    Similarly, Nehru Yuva Kendra Sangathan (NYKS) through its various programmes and interventions is reaching out to the rural youth for their empowerment and civic engagement.

    Moreover, recently, an overarching enabling mechanism- Mera Yuva Bharat (MY Bharat), an autonomous body under the Department of Youth Affairs has been established, which is powered by technology, for youth development and youth led development through ‘Kartavya Bodh’ and ‘Seva Bhaav’, during the Amrit Kaal.

    A digital platform for MY Bharat (https://www.mybharat.gov.in/) has been developed on which the youth across the country can register and signup for various volunteering opportunities being made available on the portal. The envisioned phygital (physical + digital) ecosystem is to empower young individuals to become catalysts for community transformation. So far, more than 1.65 Crore Youth have registered on the MY Bharat Portal.

    To advance the goal of developed India by 2047 among youth, the “Yuva Connect” program has been conceptualized with the aim to foster youth engagement and leadership in the developmental transformation of India. The events are organised around discussions on the concept of Viksit Bharat with young people in educational institutions throughout India. Youth also get an opportunity to interact with eminent speakers.

    Through these programs, emphasis is laid on values such as national identity, civic engagement, social cohesion, human capital development, critical thinking, and empowerment, so that students are better prepared to contribute positively to their societies. These interactions not only enhance individual growth but also strengthen the fabric of the nation as a whole. 

    This information was given by Union Minister of Youth Affairs & Sports and Labour & Employment, Dr. Mansukh Mandaviya in a written reply in Lok Sabha today.

    *****

    Himanshu Pathak

    (Release ID: 2099075) Visitor Counter : 78

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: Celebrating a decade of empowering girls: Beti Bachao Beti Padhao (BBBP) Scheme in Jharkhand

    Source: Government of India (2)

    Celebrating a decade of empowering girls: Beti Bachao Beti Padhao (BBBP) Scheme in Jharkhand

    Administration and Social Welfare Office of Palamu  launched series of awareness programmes in sync with 100 Din Sankalp Abhiyan in Jharkhand under  BBBP initiative

    Significant positive changes in Palamu district brought about thorough multi-faceted approach of BBBP initiative

    Posted On: 03 FEB 2025 12:01PM by PIB Delhi

    The Union Ministry of Women and Child Development celebrated the 10th  anniversary of the Beti Bachao Beti Padhao (BBBP) Scheme on 22 January 2025. Launched in 2015, the Beti Bachao Beti Padhao Scheme aims to protect, educate and empower girls and address gender imbalance and declining child sex ratio in India. To achieve the objectives of the Beti Bachao Beti Padhao (BBBP) Scheme, States, Union Territories and Districts are implementing programmes tailored to local and stakeholder needs.

    Palamu district of Jharkhand, known for its rich cultural heritage, has long been facing social challenges affecting girls and women, especially the rural communities.

    In sync with the 100 Din Sankalp Abhiyan in Jharkhand under the BBBP initiative, the Administration and Social Welfare Office of Palamu had launched a series of awareness programmes. The initiative was aimed at addressing the critical issues of gender inequality, women’s rights and child protection.

    Palamu district of Jharkhand has achieved remarkable success in promoting a culture of gender equality and girls’ empowerment by adopting targeted weekly themes and organizing impactful programs through the “100 Din Beti Bachao, Beti Padhao” campaign. The campaign addressed critical issues like education, health and safety, ultimately enhancing the welfare and rights of girls.

    In this special 100-day campaign, more than 70 programs were organized in Palamu district on various topics, including four programs involving 125 government officials and 22 field representatives and 216 beneficiaries were enrolled.

    Similarly, BBBP Week, a dedicated week within the 100-day campaign and the Pre-Conception Prenatal Diagnostic Techniques (PCPNDT) Enforcement Drive, organised three programmes with the participation of 54 officials and 8 local representatives, enrolling 178 beneficiaries. These programmes were specifically designed to address issues related to gender equality and child protection and their success underlined the impact of the initiative.

    The primary goal of the BBBP initiative in Palamu was to protect the rights of girls, promote gender equality and raise awareness about the importance of education for girls.

    Mission Shakti Week saw the highest enrollment of beneficiaries, with 280 participants, underlining the reach of the initiative. In total, 379 government officials and 104 representatives of local governing bodies supported these efforts, reaching out to 1,999 beneficiaries through thematic weeks focused on gender equality, skill development, legal awareness and community mobilisation. In addition, volunteers conducted door-to-door awareness campaigns, distributing stickers and pamphlets emphasizing gender equality and prevention of child marriage. Community Engagement Programs The success of the campaign in spreading awareness on issues such as ending early marriage (ECM) and violence against women and children (EVAWAC) in Palamu through rallies, street plays and group discussions is a testament to the community’s involvement and value in the initiative. Schools conducted essay competitions, signature drives and tree planting ceremonies, encouraging children to advocate for gender equality and environmental responsibility. The community’s commitment to girls’ education and development was evident in the distribution of annual Shishu Kits and Academic Excellence Awards. These initiatives were designed to support new born girls and motivate students, emphasizing the community’s dedication to their education and development.

    The initiative included various activities including inauguration ceremonies, awareness meetings with adolescents, oath taking programs, rallies and discussions on important issues such as child marriage and gender-based violence. The level of participation varied across different programmes, with some activities such as oath taking and rallies involving 59,640 women participants.

    Posters displaying key messages were made and put up in 165 out of 265 selected panchayats in Palamu and in 14 ICDS projects through Lok Sabha (LS), AWW, Jharkhand State Livelihood Promotion Society (JSLPS), gender community resource persons (CRPs), self-help groups (SHGs) and NGO representatives. Short video clips, campaign messages and social media posts addressing child protection were disseminated through local channels. IEC material was distributed to all AWC and JSLPS teams to promote awareness efforts at the grassroots level. The initiative involved a variety of activities including inaugural ceremonies, awareness sessions with adolescents, oath taking events, rallies and discussions on important issues such as child marriage and gender-based violence. Many community members participated, especially women, who were particularly active in community engagement events such as rallies.

    All age groups participated meaningfully in the initiative, particularly in the 7-18 and 18-55 age groups. Participants were significantly higher among women, reaching 180,965, as well as 1,440 men and 82 individuals identified as disabled or transgender. The initiative verified its reach and impact through photo documentation, video recordings and attendance records. The campaign outputs reflect increased awareness within the community, which is likely to lead to long-term reduction in child marriage rates and stronger support for girls’ education.

    The Central Government also appreciated these initiatives under BBBP in Palamu.

    Collaborative efforts between the Government, Schools and NGOs increase the reach and impact of gender equality initiatives. Early involvement of parents and teachers ensures more significant community participation and promotes sustained engagement. The BBBP campaign promoted substantial community participation while achieving significant milestones.

    The multi-faceted approach of the BBBP initiative brought about significant positive changes in Palamu district, including increased community participation, improved educational outcomes, and improved safety measures, providing solid evidence of the program’s success.

    **** 

    SS/MS

    (Release ID: 2099035) Visitor Counter : 50

    Read this release in: Hindi

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Polytechnic University’s AI Seminars Are Trending on the Information Agenda

    Translartion. Region: Russians Fedetion –

    Source: Peter the Great St Petersburg Polytechnic University – Peter the Great St Petersburg Polytechnic University –

    Another seminar on artificial intelligence was held at the Saint Petersburg Polytechnic University.

    Opening the meeting, SPbPU Vice-Rector for Research Yuri Fomin reminded the participants of the resonance in the global community caused by the neural network of the Chinese company DeepSeek.

    This reaction to artificial intelligence technologies once again confirms that they are trending today. And this adds new colors to our seminars, which we organized to talk about the research that is being conducted in our laboratories as popularly as possible. Because we, of course, will be active participants and authors of new technological solutions, – noted Yuri Vladimirovich.

    The fourth Polytechnic University seminar on AI attracted the attention of not only the university audience, but also external participants — representatives of the university’s industrial partners. The report of the Vice-Rector for Digital Transformation, Head of the Advanced Engineering School of SPbPU “Digital Engineering” Alexey Borovkov and Senior Researcher of the Engineering Center “Computer Engineering Center” of the SPbPU PISh Alexey Novokshenov on the topic “Artificial Intelligence in Industry on the CML-Bench® Digital Platform. Experience of Applying AI/ML in High-Tech Industry Tasks” was listened to with great interest. The scientists spoke about the digital platform for the development and application of CML-Bench® digital twins and the successful implementation of projects in the interests of the high-tech industry.

    According to Alexey Borovkov, the digital twin market is one of the fastest growing, and today it is being integrated by the largest market for artificial intelligence technologies. In addition, he noted that the CML-Bench® digital platform received a certificate of compliance with the software security requirements of the Federal Service for Technical and Export Control (FSTEC of Russia) at the sixth level of trust at the end of 2024.

    Today, our country faces an important task – achieving technological leadership, and domestic technologies, especially advanced digital and production technologies, play an important role here. Also, we should not forget about digital standardization. In 2022, the National Standard “Computer Models and Simulation. DIGITAL DOUBLES OF PRODUCTS. General Provisions” came into effect, which was developed by specialists of the NTI Center “New Production Technologies” of SPbPU together with specialists of the Federal State Unitary Enterprise “RFNC-VNIIEF” and with the participation of 25 more high-tech organizations and industry institutes. And whoever creates the standards dictates the rules, – Alexey Ivanovich emphasized and then spoke in detail about some developments using digital engineering for the fuel and energy complex and the aviation industry.

    During the discussion of the report, the seminar participants also identified a number of problems: lack of funds for testing; difficulties in introducing new developments into production; insufficient preparation of applicants entering engineering specialties.

    Alexey Gintsyak, head of the Digital Modeling of Industrial Systems laboratory of the Advanced Engineering School Digital Engineering, spoke about the study of approaches to creating intelligent multi-agent systems for predictive and prescriptive analytics in industry. The laboratory is part of the Scientific and Educational Center and the Association Artificial Intelligence in Industry and conducts a range of studies on forecasting and optimizing the activities of industrial enterprises. The report presented the results of fundamental projects carried out within the framework of a state assignment and with the support of the Russian Science Foundation, as well as the results of applied projects in various industries and economics: mechanical engineering, metallurgy, transport, and the oil and gas industry. In conclusion, the head of the laboratory shared plans for the further development of current research areas.

    Summing up the results of the seminar, Vice-Rector for Research Yuri Fomin suggested inviting speakers from other scientific organizations and universities to the seminars, and also announced the next meeting, which will be held on February 12 in the Kapitsa Hall of the Technopolis Polytech Research Building at 2 p.m.

    Photo archive

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Sudan malnutrition crisis: MSF renews call for immediate action to prevent death and starvation

    Source: Médecins Sans Frontières –

    • International donors, the UN, Sudan’s warring parties and their allies must do everything in their power to prevent more death from malnutrition in Sudan.
    • MSF has shared staggering data from malnutrition screenings in areas across Sudan, and the situation is expected to worsen during the upcoming rainy season.
    • It is possible to avoid further catastrophe if action is taken now.

    International donors, the UN, Sudan’s warring parties and their allies must act now to prevent even more avoidable deaths from malnutrition in Sudan, as the already catastrophic situation is expected to worsen this year, according to Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF).

    Half of Sudan’s population faces high levels of acute food insecurity (24.6 million people), among whom 8.5 million people face an emergency or famine-like situation according to the latest Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) report.

    “Despite this new wake-up call, robust humanitarian and diplomatic mobilisation to act on aid deliveries has fallen far short of the needs. To provide only those in the most extreme situation with monthly food rations, 2,500 aid trucks per month would be required, whereas only about 1,150 crossed into Darfur between August and December,” says Stephane Doyon, MSF operations manager.

    MSF has released data showing horrific rates of malnutrition in multiple locations, both at the height of Sudan’s lean season last year and as recently as December 2024. The conflict-driven malnutrition crisis has been exacerbated by the continued obstruction of aid by both of Sudan’s warring parties and by the neglectful inertia of the UN and aid system in Darfur. With the seasonal hunger gap coming in May, decisive action must be taken now.

    “Parts of Sudan are difficult to work in. But it is certainly possible, and this is what humanitarian organisations and the UN are supposed to do,” says Marcella Kraay, MSF emergency coordinator, speaking from Nyala, South Darfur state.

    “In places that are easier to access, as well as in the hardest to reach areas like North Darfur, options like air routes remain unexplored. The failure to act is a choice, and it’s killing people,”  says Kraay.

    The malnutrition crisis has been acknowledged for some time, with the UN in October warning that “never in history have so many people faced starvation and famine as in Sudan today.”

    Moving supplies will become an even more difficult task during the upcoming rainy and lean season, when flooded dirt roads become impossible to navigate. A wide-scale humanitarian response must be launched now, including by drastically increasing available funding and logistical capacities, securing food pipelines and prepositioning food stocks in Chad and neighbouring countries.

    MSF is calling for UN agencies, international organisations, donor countries, and governments with leverage to pursue all options, including air routes, to complement and even replace road access where necessary.

    Halima and her two month old baby see a doctor at the Kalma camp health centre, run by MSF. Sudan, December 2024.
    Abdoalsalam Abdallah

    Bureaucratic requirements from the warring parties have long been an obstacle to international organisations’ ability to reach and provide services to people. Rather than reacting to critical needs in a timely manner, permissions to respond are either delayed or denied altogether by the warring parties. This is impeding MSF ‘s work in South Darfur with aid trucks stuck in Chad waiting for permissions to move from the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) and their offices. A food distribution in South Darfur was also recently postponed as MSF was refused the necessary travel permits.

    Warring parties must grant unhindered access for humanitarian organisations. Access must be defined by lifesaving aid reaching people who need it, not by announcements celebrating piecemeal measures that fall far short. MSF calls for the warring parties, their allies, and influential states to use their leverage to ease the obstacles that are causing deaths and suffering.  
    MSF has provided data from different locations to demonstrate the depth of the malnutrition crisis. In North Darfur, where an RSF siege on its capital El Fasher is starving people and depriving them from lifesaving assistance, MSF teams screened over 9,500 children under five years old while conducting a therapeutic food distribution in Tawila locality in December 2024. They found a staggering global acute malnutrition estimate of 35.5 %, with 7% of the screened children suffering from severe acute malnutrition.

    Last September, 34% of the 29,300 children screened by MSF during a vaccination campaign in Zamzam camp were found to be suffering from acute malnutrition. Since the beginning of December, repeated shelling has made it impossible for our team to carry out further assessments in the camp and has most likely exacerbated the levels of malnutrition.

    Zahra Abdullah, living in Al Salam camp outside Nyala city This is not the first war I have experienced, but it is definitely the most devastating to my life. The living conditions here are harsh, and everything is a daily struggle.

    Zahra Abdullah, 25 years old, inside her kitchen after receiving their food basket. Sudan, January 2025.
    © Abdoalsalam Abdallah

    MSF teams also see concerning rates of malnutrition outside of Darfur, in areas where displaced people have sought shelter, or in areas closer to the conflict. In Omdurman, Khartoum state, a conflict zone under control of the Sudanese Armed Forces, MSF carried out a nutritional screening while assisting with a vaccination campaign for children in October 2024, finding 7.1% of children screened were severely acutely malnourished.

    MSF data also reveals that malnutrition is not only an issue for people close to frontlines, but also in more stable cities like Nyala, the capital of South Darfur. In October 2024, 23% of children under five screened at MSF-supported facilities in Nyala, South Darfur’s capital, and nearby locations were suffering from severe acute malnutrition. In two MSF-supported facilities, 26% of the pregnant and breastfeeding women seeking care were acutely malnourished. With WFP food distributions lacking, MSF launched a targeted food distribution in South Darfur in December 2024, providing two months’ food to about 30,000 people.

    Zahra Abdullah, 25 years old, received food for her and her son, they live together in the Al Salam displacement camp outside of Nyala city.

    “This is not the first war I have experienced, but it is definitely the most devastating to my life. The living conditions here are harsh, and everything is a daily struggle. The aid we receive has somewhat improved our situation. At least now, we finally have a meal in the morning,” says Zahra.

    “But even so, the suffering never ends. It starts with finding clean water to drink, continues with trying to provide enough food, and ends with finding a place to sleep. Sometimes I sit alone and think: is this the life I will live forever?” she says.

    For millions of people like Zahra, the time is now to act to prevent the situation from becoming ever more dire. MSF will continue to do what it can, but the scale is well beyond the organisation’s capacity to respond. We need to see a massive response now to prevent more death and starvation; timeliness is a matter of survival, not political expediency.

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-Evening Report: Labor’s dumping of Australia’s new nature laws means the environment is shaping as a key 2025 election issue

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Peter Burnett, Honorary Associate Professor, ANU College of Law, Australian National University

    Controversy over land clearing at the Lee Point (Binybara) housing development site, near Darwin, highlights the urgent need for environmental law reform. Euan Ritchie

    Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has shelved the proposed reforms to Australia’s 25-year-old environment laws, citing a lack of parliamentary support for the changes.

    The decision breaks Labor’s 2022 election commitment to overhaul the protections. The Albanese government is now the latest in a string of governments that have tried and failed to reform the law known formally as the Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (EPBC) Act.

    This is despite two major independent reviews calling for wholesale change.

    Labor’s capitulation does not, however, change the facts. Australia’s natural environment is deteriorating rapidly. Laws are urgently needed to protect our nation’s valuable natural assets.

    Establishing effective laws is an investment that will benefit Australia’s biodiversity, economy, cultural values, health and wellbeing. Nature is now a key 2025 election issue.

    How did we get here?

    An independent review of the EPBC Act, known as the Samuel Review, was completed in 2020 under the former Coalition government. It found that without urgent changes, most of Australia’s threatened plants, animals and ecosystems will become extinct.

    Federal Environment Minister Tanya Plibersek promised to act on the review’s recommendations, via a plan Labor badged as “Nature Positive”.

    The centrepiece of reform is to set national environmental standards that would be overseen by an independent regulator and watchdog called Environmental Protection Australia (EPA). But reform was split into three stages.

    Stage one legislated for national markets in nature repair and expanded the requirement to assess potential impacts on water resources under the EPBC Act. The so-called “water trigger” now captures “unconventional gas” projects such as shale gas recovery in the Northern Territory’s Beetaloo Basin. The law passed in December 2023, but the markets are not yet functioning.

    Stage two of the reforms, including establishing a federal EPA, came before the Senate in late 2024. Plibersek had reportedly made a deal with the crossbench to secure passage. But this deal was scuttled by Albanese at the eleventh hour.

    Stage two was relisted for discussion in the upcoming first parliamentary sitting week of 2025, this week. But on Saturday, Albanese told The Conversation the government would, again, not be proceeding with the reform this term.

    The reforms have been delayed for so long that we are now closer to the next statutory review of the laws, due in 2029, than to the last one.

    Stage three, which covers the bulk of substantive reform recommended in the Samuel Review, is yet to be seen publicly.

    What will happen after the next election?

    Albanese must go to the polls by May 17, but there is speculation the election may be as early as March. So what is the likely fate of these environmental reforms in the next term?

    A Roy Morgan poll on Monday found if a federal election were held now, the result would be a hung parliament. So the result is looking tight.

    Government control of the Senate is rare. So whoever is in power after the election is very likely to rely on crossbench support for any reforms.

    Albanese has ruled out forming a coalition with the Greens or crossbenchers in the event of a hung parliament. However, Opposition Leader Peter Dutton says he would negotiate with independents to form government.

    A returned Albanese majority government would probably revisit the scuttled deal on stage two. With elections in the rear-view mirror, Albanese may be prepared to wear some political pain early in the next term to secure a deal. He would also still need to roll out the bulk of the Nature Positive reforms, the detail of which remains hidden behind a vague “stage three” banner.

    A minority Albanese government may face a tougher ask: demands from an environmentally progressive crossbench for major commitments to environmental reform in return for promises of support on budget and confidence.

    A Coalition government would be coming from a very different angle. Dutton has painted Nature Positive as a
    disaster” for the economy, expressing particular concern about impacts on the mining sector.

    The Coalition’s environmental agenda is increasingly focused on “cutting green tape” – in other words, reducing bureaucratic hurdles for developers – and repealing bans on nuclear power stations. Finding crossbench support in the Senate for this agenda could be challenging.

    The Greens have vowed to make environmental protection a key election issue, urging voters to cast their ballot for nature this election.

    A recent poll published by the Biodiversity Council shows 75% of Australians support strengthening national environmental law to protect nature. Only 4% are opposed and the rest are undecided.

    But converting a high level of broad support into votes is another thing altogether – especially during a cost-of-living crisis.

    Crystal clear consequences

    The political crystal ball remains cloudy. But when it comes to the state of Australia’s environment, the picture is clear.

    The environment continues to decline and the consequences are increasingly serious. These consequences extend beyond further irreversible loss and the increasing cost of environmental repair, to include the economic and social consequences of losing more of the natural assets on which our quality of life depends.

    The building blocks of successful reform are all on the table, where the Samuel Review put them in 2020.

    When will governments accept that kicking the can down the road is selling us all down the drain?

    Peter Burnett is affiliated with the Biodiversity Council, an independent expert group founded by 11 Australian universities to promote evidence-based solutions to Australia’s biodiversity crisis.

    Euan Ritchie receives funding from the Australian Research Council and the Department of Energy, Environment, and Climate Action. Euan is a Councillor within the Biodiversity Council, a member of the Ecological Society of Australia and the Australian Mammal Society, and President of the Australian Mammal Society.

    Jaana Dielenberg was employed by the now-ended Threatened Species Recovery Hub of the Australian Government’s National Environmental Science Program, which led an earlier stage of this research. She is a Charles Darwin University Fellow and is employed by the University of Melbourne and the Biodiversity Council.

    ref. Labor’s dumping of Australia’s new nature laws means the environment is shaping as a key 2025 election issue – https://theconversation.com/labors-dumping-of-australias-new-nature-laws-means-the-environment-is-shaping-as-a-key-2025-election-issue-248872

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-Evening Report: The AEC wants to stop AI and misinformation. But it’s up against a problem that is deep and dark

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Susan Grantham, Lecturer in Communication, Griffith University

    From the moment you open your social media feed, you’re stepping into a digital battleground where not all political messages are what they seem.

    The upcoming federal election will see an influx of deepfakes, doctored images, and tailored narratives that blur the line between fact and fiction.

    Last week, the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) relaunched its Stop and Consider campaign. The campaign urges voters to pause and reflect, particularly regarding information about how to vote. But its message applies to all forms of misinformation.

    AEC Commissioner Jeff Pope warns:

    A federal election must be held in the next few months, so now is the perfect time to encourage all Australians to have a healthy degree of scepticism when it comes to what they see, hear or read.

    The simple directives outlined in this campaign are designed to slow the spread of misleading information in a digital age where algorithms boost engagement at speed.

    So how effective is it likely to be in helping voters sift the real from the fake? While the campaign benefits from the AEC’s credibility and its accessible message, it also faces significant hurdles.

    Digital deception in action

    In 2024, AI made a notable impact on international political campaigns.

    In the US, the Federal Communications Commission fined a political consultant $6 million for orchestrating fake robocalls that featured an AI-generated deepfake of President Joe Biden’s voice.

    During India’s 2024 election, Meta (which owns Facebook) approved AI-manipulated ads spreading disinformation and hate. This exacerbated divisive narratives and failing to regulate harmful content.

    Meanwhile, the Australian Labor Party deployed an AI-generated video of opposition leader Peter Dutton as part of its online efforts.

    Additionally, the Liberal Party has again engaged duo Topham Guerin, who are known for their use of AI and controversial political tactics.

    Political leaders are increasingly turning to platforms like TikTok to attract votes. But one of the problems with TikTok for users is that it encourages endless scrolling and can cause users to miss subtle inaccuracies.

    Adding to these concerns is a recent scam in which doctored images and fabricated celebrity headlines were circulated. It created the illusion of legitimacy and defrauded many Australians of their money.

    These incidents are a stark reminder of how quickly digital manipulation can mislead, whether in commercial scams or political messaging.

    But are we taking it seriously?

    South Korea has taken a decisive stance against AI-generated deepfakes in political campaigns by banning them outright. Penalties include up to seven years in prison or fines of 50 million won (A$55,400). This measure forms part of a broader legal framework designed to enforce transparency, accountability, and ethical AI use.

    In Australia, teal independents are calling for stricter truth in political advertising laws. The proposed laws aim to impose civil penalties for misleading political ads, including disinformation and hate speech.

    However, combating misinformation created by anonymous or unknown parties, such as AI-generated deepfakes, remains a challenge that may require further regulatory measures and technological solutions.

    All of this is unfolding at a time when the approach to fact-checking is itself in flux. In January, Meta made headlines by scrapping its third-party fact-checking program in the US. This was done in favour of a “community notes” system. The change was championed by CEO Mark Zuckerberg as a way to reduce censorship and protect free expression.

    However, critics warn that without independent oversight, misinformation could spread more easily, potentially leading to a surge in hate speech and harmful rhetoric. These shifts in digital policy only add to the challenge of ensuring that voters receive reliable information.

    So, will the AEC’s campaign have any effect?

    Amid these challenges, the “Stop and Consider” campaign arrives at a critical moment. Yet despite scholars’ repeated calls to embed digital literacy in school curriculums and community programs, these recommendations often go unheard.

    The campaign is a positive step, offering guidance in an era of rapid digital manipulation. The simple message – to pause and verify political content — can help foster a more discerning electorate.

    However, given the volume of misinformation and sophisticated targeting techniques, the campaign alone is unlikely to be a silver bullet. Political campaigns are growing ever more sophisticated. With the introduction of anonymous deepfakes, voters, educators, regulators, and platforms must work together to ensure the truth isn’t lost in digital noise.

    A robust foundation in digital literacy is vital. Not only for this campaign to work but to help society distinguish credible sources from deceptive content. We must empower future voters to navigate the complexities of our digital world and engage more fully in democracy.

    Globally, diverse strategies provide valuable insights.

    While Australia’s “Stop and Consider” campaign takes a reflective approach, Sweden’s “Bli inte lurad” initiative is refreshingly direct. It warns citizens: “Don’t be fooled.”

    By delivering clear, actionable tips to spot scams and misleading content, the Swedish model leverages its strong tradition of public education and consumer protection.

    This no-nonsense strategy reinforces digital literacy efforts. It also highlights that safeguarding the public from digital manipulation requires both proactive education and robust regulatory measures.

    It may be time for Australian regulators to act decisively to protect the integrity of democracy.

    Susan Grantham does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. The AEC wants to stop AI and misinformation. But it’s up against a problem that is deep and dark – https://theconversation.com/the-aec-wants-to-stop-ai-and-misinformation-but-its-up-against-a-problem-that-is-deep-and-dark-248773

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-Evening Report: With the Gaza ceasefire in the balance, all eyes are on Benjamin Netanyahu’s trip to Washington

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Amin Saikal, Emeritus Professor of Middle Eastern and Central Asian Studies, Australian National University

    The brittle Gaza ceasefire between Israel and Hamas continues against all odds, given the depth of distrust and animosity between the warring parties.

    Since its enactment nearly three weeks ago, Hamas has released more than a dozen Israeli hostages captured on October 7 2023, in return for some 400 Palestinian prisoners from Israeli jails. Should the process move forward as relatively smoothly as it has so far, more hostages and prisoners are set to be freed during the remainder of the first stage of the truce.

    This is cause for a degree of optimism. However, negotiating the length, terms and implementation of the second and third stages of the ceasefire will prove very rocky.

    Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, for instance, has already declared the ceasefire to be “temporary”.

    During the second stage, all Israeli hostages (alive and dead) are supposed to be freed in exchange for hundreds of prisoners. Israel is also expected to withdraw all its forces from Gaza as a prelude to the reconstruction of the coastal enclave in the final stage of the ceasefire.

    There are many issues that could derail the process, two of which are crucial:

    • Israel’s unrealised goal of wiping out Hamas and securing Gaza for itself

    • Hamas’ resolve to regain sovereign control over Gaza.

    Another factor is the influence of the new US president, Donald Trump. While
    Netanyahu has the full support of Trump, it remains unclear how much appetite the US leader has for more conflict in the Middle East.

    A meeting between the two in Washington this week could be pivotal to the success of the next phase of the ceasefire – or the resumption of the Gaza war.

    Hamas’ survival at odds with Israel’s war aims

    Israel has certainly degraded Hamas over the past 15 months of its scorched-earth operations in Gaza, which it launched in response to Hamas’ attacks on October 7 2023. However, it has not eliminated the group.

    The appearance of well-armed and well-composed Hamas fighters in the choreographed three rounds of hostage transfers in the areas that Israel has demolished testifies to the group’s survival.

    It essentially signals the failure of Netanyahu and his extremist supporters to achieve their main goals of uprooting Hamas and securing the release of the hostages through military action.

    Netanyahu’s acceptance of the ceasefire at this point clearly underlines the futility of the use of force as the only means to seek vengeance against Hamas. With the conflict in a stalemate for months, he could have embraced the ceasefire much earlier, thereby securing a quicker hostage release without more lives lost or more damage to Israel’s already-tarnished international reputation.

    Hamas’ survival means it is still a dangerous force, former US Secretary of State Antony Blinken said in mid-January. He said the group has “recruited almost as many new militants as it has lost” in the war.

    Reports also indicate Hamas has also maintained its control over Gaza’s administration and security forces, despite Israel’s efforts to destroy it.

    If that is the case, Israeli citizens – who have been highly polarised between those wanting the return of the hostages via a ceasefire and those backing Netanyahu’s government to continue the war – have the right to seriously question the prime minister’s leadership.

    The same applies to Israel’s outside supporters, especially the United States.

    Yet, this may not happen. The war-makers may win over the peace aspirants. For Netanyahu and his backers, the job is not finished. Many observers believe the very survival of Hamas can only motivate them further to resume the war once all the hostages are freed.

    What does Trump want?

    The future of the ceasefire now seems to hinge on Netanyahu’s meeting with Trump in Washington. According to media reports, the Israeli leader is keen to see where Trump stands on the second phase of the deal before negotiations continue.

    Trump recently doubled down on his suggestion to “clear out” Gaza’s 2.3 million citizens – though he has mentioned a figure of 1.5 million – by relocating them to Egypt and Jordan. Given the previous statements of the extremists in Netanyahu’s shaky coalition, nothing would please them more than a depopulated and annexed Gaza.

    Cairo and Amman, as well as other Arab countries, have firmly rejected the idea. Hamas and the enfeebled Palestinian Authority in the West Bank have outrightly condemned it.

    But Trump has insisted the Egyptian and Jordanian leaders would eventually come around because the US does a lot for them – referring presumably to their dependence on substantial annual American aid.

    If this plan were to transpire, it would not only be a recipe for more bloodshed and instability in the Middle East, but also more betrayal of the Palestinian cause and the two-state solution by the international community.

    While a ray of hope exists for the continuation of the ceasefire and the implementation of the ceasefire’s second stage, it is still very possible that Netanyahu will return to military action to destroy Hamas and annex part or all of Gaza along the lines of what Trump has suggested.

    The Trump-Netanyahu bond is so strong that it could even enable the Israeli leader to declare sovereignty over the West Bank.

    Given these uncertainties, the third stage of the ceasefire regarding the reconstruction of Gaza, which is estimated to be upwards of US$80 billion (A$1.3 trillion), is at this point nothing more than words on a piece of paper.

    Amin Saikal does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. With the Gaza ceasefire in the balance, all eyes are on Benjamin Netanyahu’s trip to Washington – https://theconversation.com/with-the-gaza-ceasefire-in-the-balance-all-eyes-are-on-benjamin-netanyahus-trip-to-washington-248873

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-Evening Report: Supersonic jets are making a comeback – but despite the hype, don’t expect to book yet

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Chris James, UQ Amplify Senior Lecturer, Centre for Hypersonics, School of Mechanical and Mining Engineering, The University of Queensland

    Rendering of Boom Supersonic’s proposed Overture supersonic airliner. Boom Supersonic

    Late last week, American company Boom Supersonic flew faster than the speed of sound with its XB-1 supersonic demonstrator aircraft. It’s now the first piloted non-military aircraft to break the sound barrier since the Concorde was retired from service in 2003.

    It’s the first step in Boom’s ambitious goal to have supersonic airliners carry passengers by 2029.

    But what exactly is supersonic travel? There are good reasons why it’s not more common, despite the hype.

    Boom Supersonic’s XB-1 supersonic demonstrator aircraft during its 11th test flight where it became the first civilian aircraft to fly supersonically since the Concorde.
    Boom Supersonic

    What is supersonic flight?

    The Mach number is defined as a plane’s speed divided by the speed that sound waves move through the air. To “break the sound barrier” means to fly faster than the speed of sound, with Mach numbers greater than 1.

    The Mach number is an important ratio: as a plane flies, it disturbs the air in front of it. These disturbances move at the speed of sound. In supersonic flight these disturbances combine to form shock waves around the vehicle.

    When people say you can see a fighter jet before you hear it, they’re referring to supersonic flight: fighter jets can travel at around Mach 2.

    The sound from the fighter jet is trapped inside its shock wave; until the shock wave moves to your position on the ground, you won’t hear the plane.

    Illustration of how disturbances propagate in subsonic, Mach 1, and supersonic flow.
    Chabacano/Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA

    The allure of supersonic travel

    For efficiency reasons, most passenger jets cruise slightly slower than the speed of sound, at around Mach 0.8 (this is subsonic flight).

    Boom plans to build an airliner called Overture that can fly at Mach 1.7. Flying supersonically can drastically decrease flight times. The company claims a trip from New York to Rome on Overture could take just four hours and 40 minutes, instead of eight hours.

    Boom isn’t the only company working on this lofty goal. American firm Spike Aerospace is also developing a supersonic business jet, with the tagline “delivering the world in half the time”.

    This is the value proposition of supersonic passenger travel.

    In limited ways, it did already exist in the 20th century. However, due to timing, bad luck and the laws of physics, it didn’t continue.

    Remember the Concorde?

    Designs for supersonic airliners began in the mid-20th century, and by the 1970s we had supersonic passenger flight.

    There was the little-known Russian Tupolev-144 and Concorde, a Franco-British supersonic airliner operated by British Airways and Air France from 1976 to 2003.

    Concorde had a capacity of up to 128 passengers and cruised at Mach 2. It regularly travelled from London to New York in around three hours. The flights were expensive, mainly shuttling business people and the rich and famous.

    British Airways Concorde in flight.
    Wikimedia Commons/Eduard Marmet, CC BY-SA

    Why supersonic passenger flight didn’t take off

    Concorde was designed in the 1960s when it seemed like supersonic passenger transport was going to be the next big thing.

    Instead, the Boeing 747 entered commercial service in 1970. Cheap, large and efficient airliners like it blew Concorde out of the water.

    Designed to cruise efficiently at supersonic speeds, Concorde was extremely fuel inefficient when taking off and accelerating. Concorde’s expensive, “gas guzzling” nature was a complaint levelled against it for most of its lifetime.

    A catastrophic 1973 Paris air show crash of the competing Russian airliner, Tupolev Tu-144, also shifted public perception on supersonic flight safety at a time when many airlines were considering whether or not to purchase Concordes.

    Only 20 Concordes were manufactured out of the planned 100. It is still disputed today whether Concorde ever made money for the airlines who operated it.

    Illustration of a shock wave propagating from a supersonic aeroplane and hitting the ground to produce a sonic boom.
    Cmglee/Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA

    Noise is a real problem for supersonic flight

    Remember the fighter jets? When a plane travels supersonically, its shock waves propagate to the ground, causing loud disturbances called sonic booms. In extreme cases they can shatter windows and damage buildings.

    In the early 1970s, sonic boom concerns led the United States government to ban supersonic passenger flight over land in the US. This hurt the Concorde’s potential market, hence its only two regular routes were trans-Atlantic flights principally over the water.

    The Concorde was also a very loud plane at take off, since it needed a lot of thrust to leave the ground.

    Video footage of the final Concorde takeoff from New York’s JFK airport.

    The future of supersonic travel

    A future for supersonic travel relies on solving some or all of the issues Concorde faced.

    NASA and Lockheed Martin’s Quesst project aims to show sonic boom can be dissipated to manageable levels. They plan to fly their X-59 supersonic aircraft over US cities and gauge responses from citizens.

    Quesst aims to use the geometry of the X-59, with a long elongated nose, to dissipate sonic booms to a weak “thump”, hopefully allowing supersonic airliners to travel over land in the future.

    NASA’s X-59 quiet supersonic research aircraft.
    NASA/Steve Freeman

    Spike Aerospace’s Spike S-512 Diplomat concept also aims to be a “quiet” supersonic aircraft with a less disruptive sonic boom.

    Can Boom surpass Concorde?

    Boom Supersonic don’t plan to fly supersonically over land. Their plan is to fly over land at Mach 0.94, which they claim will allow 20% faster overland travel than standard passenger airliners, even subsonically.

    They also claim the design of their engines will ensure Overture is no louder than modern subsonic airliners when it takes off.

    Rendering of Boom Supersonic’s Overture supersonic airliner on the runway.
    Boom Supersonic

    In terms of gas guzzling, they plan to use up to 100% sustainable aviation fuel to reduce emissions and their carbon footprint.

    Concorde was made of aluminium using design tools available in the 1960s. Modern design methods and modern aerospace materials such as titanium and carbon fibre should also allow Overture and similar craft to weigh much less than Concorde, improving efficiency.

    While Boom are currently receiving a lot of interest, with orders from many airlines, Concorde did have similar commitment before it become available. Most of it didn’t eventuate.

    Additionally, Concorde was the product of an analogue era when the idea of flying to London or New York for the day for an important business meeting seemed like a necessary thing. In a world of remote work and video meetings, is there still a need for a supersonic airliner in the 2020s?

    For now, supersonic airliners like Overture are likely to remain in the realm of the rich and famous, like Concorde did. But with modern technological advances, it will be interesting to see whether supersonic passenger travel once again becomes reality – or even goes mainstream. Only time will tell.

    Chris James receives funding from the Australian Research Council, the Commonwealth Defence Science and Technology Group (DSTG), and the US Office of Naval Research.

    ref. Supersonic jets are making a comeback – but despite the hype, don’t expect to book yet – https://theconversation.com/supersonic-jets-are-making-a-comeback-but-despite-the-hype-dont-expect-to-book-yet-248656

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-Evening Report: Poison baits were used on 1,400 feral cats, foxes and dingoes. We studied their fate to see what works

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Pat Taggart, Adjunct Fellow in Ecology, University of Adelaide

    Bee Stephens, CC BY

    Poisoned baits are the main way land managers control foxes, feral cats and dingoes. Baiting is done to reduce livestock and economic losses, or pressure on endangered wildlife.

    Millions of baits are laid annually. But we still don’t understand how effective baiting actually is. Current evidence paints a mixed picture. That’s a problem, because baiting can have unintended consequences, such as killing native animals we don’t want to target. Some research suggests baiting can actually increase attacks on livestock, or that poisoning dingoes can increase feral cat and fox numbers and worsen the damage to native wildlife.

    We need better evidence on what baiting does and doesn’t do. Our new research draws on data from 34 previous studies assessing baiting effectiveness. In total, these largely Australian studies summarised the fate of more than 1,400 cats, foxes and dingoes. We used these data sets to conduct the most comprehensive analysis of baiting effectiveness to date.

    Biosecurity officers drying meat baits for a baiting program in Broken Hill in 2019.
    NSW Government, Local Land Services, Western Region, CC BY

    Baiting is ubiquitous

    Baits can be purchased commercially or produced in-house. In some states, land managers can bring meat baits to government authorities to have poison added free of charge. They are then distributed by vehicle along tracks and roads or dropped from aircraft across vast areas of Australia, New Zealand and islands worldwide.

    Single baiting programs can sometimes cover areas larger than 9,000 square kilometres – a land area similar to Puerto Rico or Cyprus.

    So how can we best undertake these baiting programs?

    1. Baiting does work

    Across the 34 studies, baiting cut predator survival in half (51.7%) – substantially higher than the death rate in unbaited areas (16%).

    This finding was broadly consistent regardless of whether baits were placed along tracks and roads or scattered over broader areas.

    In some cases, predator numbers can recover rapidly following baiting. Under favourable conditions, feral cat and fox populations can double in a year, while dingo populations can grow 50% annually. But, under average conditions, such high rates of population increase are likely uncommon.

    Predators from outside the control area can rapidly repopulate areas after a baiting program. For example, multiple studies have found no change in fox numbers even when baiting was conducted at monthly intervals. Similar results have been found after intensive fox shooting.

    But there are also examples where prolonged, broad-scale baiting has worked well. To protect the threatened yellow footed rock wallaby, researchers baited around wallaby populations in New South Wales and South Australia and largely eliminated foxes from large areas. Wallaby numbers then increased.

    2. Feral cats take baits too

    Feral cats are opportunistic ambush predators and hunt a wide range of prey. They’re visually driven and prefer fresh meat. For these reasons, it’s long been thought they are less likely to eat poisoned bait than foxes and dingoes.

    Feral cats are silent, stealthy hunters who prefer to hunt rather than scavenge.
    Vanessa Westcott, CC BY

    But our analysis doesn’t support this – feral cats appeared to be just as susceptible to baits as foxes and dingoes. That’s good news for wildlife.

    Significant and ongoing work has been put into designing better baits for feral cats to increase consumption rates. The most widely known of these baits is Eradicat, a sausage-style bait.

    While this bait is aimed at feral cats, our analysis didn’t provide strong evidence showing Eradicat actually killed more feral cats than other poison bait recipes. This suggests any bait is more effective than no bait when it comes to cat control.

    Eradicat baits have to be sweated to bring out the oils and make them more appealing.
    Luke Bayley, CC BY

    3. Blanket coverage works better

    In land manager circles, there’s a long-running debate over how best to bait. Some advocate putting out more baits over the same area, while others suggest more frequent baiting is better.

    So which is it? Our analysis shows more baits in an area is likely to equate to better control of predators, while distributing baits more frequently may not have the same effect.

    Why is this? Like people, animals are individuals, with their own behavioural tendencies. Wary animals may never take baits. Some foxes are known to store baits to eat later, by which time the baits may be less toxic, sickening rather than killing the animal.

    This is believed to lead to bait aversion, where foxes avoid baits in the future due to previous bad experiences – just as we might avoid foods which made us sick.

    A single, more intensive application of bait is likely to work better because susceptible predators eat the bait and die, and there is limited opportunity for bait aversion to develop. In contrast, more frequent baiting in a short period of time are of limited benefit because animals learn to avoid them.

    Dingoes have been routinely baited for decades.
    Ian Mayo, CC BY

    Fresh baits have long been believed to be eaten more readily than dry baits.

    But our analysis shows this may not always be true. Overall, the type of bait had little impact on whether or not it led to reduced predator survival.

    Optimising baiting

    More efficient control of predators will mean fewer baits are needed to achieve the same result. That, in turn, means less risk of harming other native animals, as well as reducing how much work and money it costs to control feral cats, foxes and dingoes.

    Our research shows baiting does indeed cut the number of predators prowling an area. But it also shows many factors we thought were important in making a baiting program effective may only have a limited effect.

    The goal of poison baiting is to reduce the damage predators do to livestock and wildlife. Baiting is an important and effective tool in reducing predator pressure on threatened species. But its efficacy – and the risk other animals could take the bait – means we have a responsibility to continually optimise its use and ensure its application is targeted.

    Pat Taggart receives funding from the federal Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry.

    Daniel Noble receives funding from the Australian Research Council.

    Yong Zhi Foo receives funding from the the Australian Research Council.

    ref. Poison baits were used on 1,400 feral cats, foxes and dingoes. We studied their fate to see what works – https://theconversation.com/poison-baits-were-used-on-1-400-feral-cats-foxes-and-dingoes-we-studied-their-fate-to-see-what-works-246324

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-Evening Report: Can you get sunburnt or UV skin damage through car or home windows?

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Theresa Larkin, Associate Professor of Medical Sciences, University of Wollongong

    Zac Harris/Unsplash

    When you’re in a car, train or bus, do you choose a seat to avoid being in the sun or do you like the sunny side?

    You can definitely feel the sun’s heat through a window. But can you get sunburn or skin damage when in your car or inside with the windows closed?

    Let’s look at how much UV (ultraviolet) radiation passes through different types of glass, how tinting can help block UV, and whether we need sunscreen when driving or indoors.

    What’s the difference between UVA and UVB?

    Of the total UV radiation that reaches Earth, about 95% is UVA and 5% is UVB.

    UVB only reaches the upper layers of our skin but is the major cause of sunburn, cataracts and skin cancer.

    UVA penetrates deeper into our skin and causes cell damage that leads to skin cancer.

    UVA penetrates deeper than UVB.
    Shutterstock/solar22

    Glass blocks UVA and UVB radiation differently

    All glass used in house, office and car windows completely blocks UVB from passing through.

    But only laminated glass can completely block UVA. UVA can pass through other glass used in car, house and office windows and cause skin damage, increasing the risk of cancer.

    Car windscreens block UVA, but the side and rear windows don’t

    A car’s front windscreen lets in lots of sunshine and light. Luckily it blocks 98% of UVA radiation because it is made of two layers of laminated glass.

    But the side and rear car windows are made of tempered glass, which doesn’t completely block UVA. A study of 29 cars found a range from 4% to almost 56% of UVA passed through the side and rear windows.

    The UVA protection was not related to the car’s age or cost, but to the type of glass, its colour and whether it has been tinted or coated in a protective film. Grey or bronze coloured glass, and window tinting, all increase UVA protection. Window tinting blocks around 95% of UVA radiation.

    In a separate study from Saudi Arabia, researchers fitted drivers with a wearable radiation monitor. They found drivers were exposed to UV index ratings up to 3.5. (In Australia, sun protection is generally recommended when the UV index is 3 or above – at this level it takes pale skin about 20 minutes to burn.)

    So if you have your windows tinted, you should not have to wear sunscreen in the car. But without tinted windows, you can accumulate skin damage.

    UV exposure while driving increases skin cancer risk

    Many people spend a lot of time in the car – for work, commuting, holiday travel and general transport. Repeated UVA radiation exposure through car side windows might go unnoticed, but it can affect our skin.

    Indeed, skin cancer is more common on the driver’s side of the body. A study in the United States (where drivers sit on the left side) found more skin cancers on the left than the right side for the face, scalp, arm and leg, including 20 times more for the arm.

    Another US study found this effect was higher in men. For melanoma in situ, an early form of melanoma, 74% of these cancers were on the on the left versus 26% on the right.

    Earlier Australian studies reported more skin damage and more skin cancer on the right side.

    Cataracts and other eye damage are also more common on the driver’s side of the body.

    What about UV exposure through home or office windows?

    We see UV damage from sunlight through our home windows in faded materials, furniture or plastics.

    Most glass used in residential windows lets a lot of UVA pass through, between 45 and 75%.

    Residential windows can let varied amounts of UVA through.
    Sherman Trotz/Pexels

    Single-pane glass lets through the most UVA, while thicker, tinted or coated glass blocks more UVA.

    The best options are laminated glass, or double-glazed, tinted windows that allow less than 1% of UVA through.

    Skylights are made from laminated glass, which completely stops UVA from passing through.

    Most office and commercial window glass has better UVA protection than residential windows, allowing less than 25% of UVA transmission. These windows are usually double-glazed and tinted, with reflective properties or UV-absorbent chemicals.

    Some smart windows that reduce heat using chemical treatments to darken the glass can also block UVA.

    So when should you wear sunscreen and sunglasses?

    The biggest risk with skin damage while driving is having the windows down or your arm out the window in direct sun. Even untinted windows will reduce UVA exposure to some extent, so it’s better to have the car window up.

    For home windows, window films or tint can increase UVA protection of single pane glass. UVA blocking by glass is similar to protection by sunscreen.

    When you need to use sunscreen depends on your skin type, latitude and time of the year. In a car without tinted windows, you could burn after one hour in the middle of the day in summer, and two hours in the middle of a winter’s day.

    But in the middle of the day next to a home window that allows more UVA to pass through, it could take only 30 minutes to burn in summer and one hour in winter.

    When the UV index is above three, it is recommended you wear protective sunglasses while driving or next to a sunny window to avoid eye damage.

    Theresa Larkin does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Can you get sunburnt or UV skin damage through car or home windows? – https://theconversation.com/can-you-get-sunburnt-or-uv-skin-damage-through-car-or-home-windows-246599

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-Evening Report: Politics with Michelle Grattan: John Blaxland and Richard Holden talk about what Trump will mean for Australia

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra

    As Australia gears up for the election, the incoming government’ Labor or Coalition, will face global challenges, geo-political and economic, especially with Donald Trump starting to impose tariffs on selected countries including China,

    To discuss where Australia is placed to meet new circumstances we’re joined by two experts.

    John Blaxland is Director of the ANU North America Liaison Office, based in Washington, and Professor of International Security and Intelligence Studies. Richard Holden is Professor of Economics at UNSW.

    Blaxland outlines how Australia should continue to support the current international norms, and how changing norms could spell trouble,

    The rules based international order is something that we are going to feel the absence of quite keenly. For small and middle powers like Australia the reliance on that order has obviated the need to spend up a lot on military capabilities and that’s going to shift.

    We’ve seen the United States walking away from COP-related agreements but these arrangements still have global momentum and I would contend that Australia has an interest in continuing to support them as best as possible, particularly for the sake of our partners in the Pacific, but also just for our own sake.

    On who could deal with Trump better, Blaxland doesn’t think it would make a lot of difference,

    I don’t think the United States pays much attention to what happens internally in Australian politics and I think the Albanese government and Penny Wong and Richard Marles and others are wise to present as small a target as possible. The ALP is playing a difficult hand well in bilateral relations with the United States. Broadly it is still strongly in our interests to make that work as best we can.

    There’s no question there’s a closer Liberal-Trump alignment, and that may make it easier. But the economic and security relations are key and here it’s important to remember that the United States has a trade surplus with Australia and so that means we’re not in his [Trump’s] crosshairs immediately for having the opposite, and America is the biggest foreign direct investor in Australia by a country mile.

    Holden says of the economy internationally,

    The global economy is well on the way to recovering from the post-pandemic inflation, the associated increases in most advanced economies and interest rates in most of those jurisdictions, are coming down. In some of those, New Zealand is an example there’s been a real hit to the economy. But it’s generally looking reasonably positive with the one big looming thing, which is what happens to international trade as a result of the Trump tariff threats that are now starting to be put into action.

    But Holden is a bit more pessimistic about Australia’s economy,

    Not to be too gloomy about things, I think the news is a little less good. So the Prime Minister I heard on your podcast recently and the Treasurer talking about their last two budgets, and while they’re right that there has been two small budget surpluses, that’s really off the back of just an extraordinary windfall in terms of tax revenue.

    On debt,

    If you look going forward, even so far government decisions have added $78 to $80 billion to that debt and the recent mid-year update, MYEFO reports the cumulative debt for the next four years will be over $140 billion of the increase.

    I think there’s a sense that our fiscal house is really being put into really good shape and I don’t think that’s accurate.

    Michelle Grattan does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Politics with Michelle Grattan: John Blaxland and Richard Holden talk about what Trump will mean for Australia – https://theconversation.com/politics-with-michelle-grattan-john-blaxland-and-richard-holden-talk-about-what-trump-will-mean-for-australia-248866

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Human rights and democracy on the agenda as UK Human Rights Ambassador visits Bangladesh

    Source: United Kingdom – Government Statements

    UK Human Rights Ambassador Eleanor Sanders is arriving in Dhaka for a three-day visit to hold meetings with the Interim Government, human rights defenders and other partners.

    The UK reiterates its commitment to supporting Bangladesh in upholding human rights and democracy as Human Rights Ambassador Eleanor Sanders arrives in Dhaka today.

    The UK has a long-standing commitment to the promotion and protection of human rights in Bangladesh and across the world. Since the formation of the Interim Government, the UK has supported the government’s agenda to restore law and order, ensure accountability and establish rule of law. 

    During her three-day visit to Bangladesh, Human Rights Ambassador will discuss justice and accountability, human rights and fundamental freedoms with advisers and senior officials across government.  

    She will pay a visit to the University of Dhaka to deliver a seminar on human rights and engage with students. During the seminar, the Ambassador and the students will discuss the importance of upholding fundamental freedoms including media freedom, freedom of religion or belief and ensuring the protection of minority groups.

    She will also visit Cox’s Bazar to oversee UK funded projects in the Rohingya refugee camps including food distribution, female health and education activities and LPG distribution. 

    The Ambassador will also announce new UK funding for the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) to strengthen accountability for human rights violations and abuses. 

    Human Rights Ambassador Eleanor Sanders said: 

    The UK strongly supports the Interim Government’s work to advance sustainable, long term reforms which are grounded in respect for human rights, as well as growth.

    Through my visit, we hope further to strengthen UK-Bangladesh collaboration on a range of priority issues such as accountability and justice, freedom of religion or belief, media freedom, gender equality and labour rights. We will also consolidate our multilateral partnership with Bangladesh – an important current member of the UN Human Rights Council.

    British High Commissioner to Bangladesh Sarah Cooke Said: 

    I am pleased to welcome UK Human Rights Ambassador Eleanor Sanders to Bangladesh. This visit is another illustration of the UK’s deep friendship with Bangladesh and longstanding commitment to help create a more prosperous and democratic future for the people of Bangladesh. 

    Updates to this page

    Published 3 February 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom