Category: European Union

  • MIL-OSI China: Rodrigo De Paul to join Lionel Messi at Inter Miami

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    FIFA World Cup winner Rodrigo de Paul is on the verge of completing a move from Atletico Madrid to Inter Miami, after it was confirmed the Argentinian did not travel with his team-mates for Atletico’s first day of training ahead of the new season.

    Real Madrid’s Eduardo Camavinga (C) vies with Atletico de Madrid’s Rodrigo de Paul (R) during the Spanish league (La Liga) football match between Real Madrid and Atletico de Madrid at Santiago Bernabeu stadium in Madrid, Spain, on Feb. 4, 2024. (Photo by Gustavo Valiente/Xinhua)

    Following the club’s disappointing early exit from the FIFA Club World Cup, Atletico resumed training on Monday without the 31-year-old.

    De Paul is putting the finishing touches to his move to play alongside Lionel Messi and former Barcelona players Sergio Busquets and Jordi Alba.

    He joined Atletico from Italian side Udinese in the summer of 2021 and has played 186 times for Diego Simeone’s team, scoring 14 goals. 

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI China: Liverpool agree £79m deal for striker Hugo Ekitike

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    Liverpool have officially announced that they have reached an agreement with Eintracht Frankfurt over the signing of striker Hugo Ekitike in a deal worth 79 million pounds (106 million U.S. dollars).

    Joe Scally (L) of Borussia Moenchengladbach vies with Hugo Ekitike of Eintracht Frankfurt during the first division of Bundesliga football match between Borussia Moenchengladbach and Eintracht Frankfurt in Moenchengladbach, Germany, Feb. 8, 2025. (Photo by Ulrich Hufnagel/Xinhua)

    In a statement released on Monday, the club confirmed: “The Reds and the German outfit have struck a transfer deal said to be worth 69 million pounds plus 10 million pounds in add-ons.”

    Ekitike is expected to travel to Merseyside later this week to undergo a medical and finalize a long-term contract with manager Arne Slot’s team.

    The 23-year-old Frenchman was an unused substitute in Eintracht’s pre-season friendly on Saturday as negotiations regarding his future continued. Ekitike scored 22 goals in 48 appearances across all competitions last season, helping Eintracht secure qualification for the Champions League.

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI China: UK launches 50-Day military support campaign for Ukraine

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    British Defence Secretary John Healey on Monday announced the launch of a 50-day military support campaign for Ukraine, aligning with a recent warning issued by U.S. President Donald Trump to Russia.

    Healey said on social media platform X that at the Ukraine Defence Contact Group (UDCG) meeting held on Monday, participating countries reached a new agreement to supply critical air defence ammunition to Ukraine, “as part of a 50-day drive to arm Ukraine and force Putin to the negotiating table.”

    Last week, Trump said that he had secured an agreement with NATO allies to facilitate large-scale arms deliveries to Ukraine. He also warned Russia that it would face a second round of tariffs if it fails to reach a peace deal within 50 days.

    At the UDCG meeting, Healey affirmed Britain’s support, saying that Britain “backs this policy” and will fully participate to ensure its success, according to French news outlet AFP.

    Healey also revealed that Britain and Germany have agreed to jointly provide air defence missiles to Ukraine. The partnership is part of a wider European initiative aimed at strengthening Ukraine’s defensive capabilities.

    According to a press release from the British Ministry of Defence on Monday, Britain has already delivered more than 150 million pounds (202.5 million U.S. dollars) worth of air defence missiles and artillery to Ukraine over the past two months. The country is also ramping up procurement efforts to provide hundreds more air defence missiles and thousands of artillery shells.

    In total, Britain is expected to spend at least 700 million pounds on air defence and artillery support for Ukraine this year, including the 150 million pounds worth of equipment already delivered, according to the release. (

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI: PBK Miner launches the first XRP cloud mining platform, leading the Ripple cloud mining revolution, using XRP to earn daily passive income

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    London, United Kingdom , July 21, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — A new US stablecoin bill passed in July 2025 is further improving regulatory clarity and opening the door to institutional adoption. Ripple’s USD-backed stablecoin, RLUSD, is fully collateralized by cash and US Treasuries and issued on the XRP Ledger.
    For investors who hold a large amount of XRP, PBKMiner provides a safe, compliant and scalable way to convert their assets into a high-yield passive income source. Users do not need to sell their positions or bear the risk of currency price fluctuations. They only need to top up and purchase computing power contracts to automatically obtain stable income every day. How to make money through cloud mining? Traditional cryptocurrency mining requires high hardware investment, complex technical configuration and continuous electricity consumption, but now, cloud mining has completely changed all this. Users can easily participate in mining by simply renting remote computing power through an online platform.

    Against the backdrop of the continued rise in the global cryptocurrency market, PBKMiner officially launched the XRP mining new user incentive plan, with “zero threshold, high returns” as the core, to help new and old users easily participate in digital currency mining. The platform quickly became the focus of the industry with its innovative reward mechanism, flexible contract selection, and transparent profit model.
    XRP Cloud Mining Now AvailableEasy, Smart, and Profitable
    XRP has long been recognized for its role in cross-border payments and institutional financing, and now PBKMiner’s latest innovation – user-friendly cloud mining, takes XRP to the next level.
    Users can mine XRP directly or take advantage of PBKMiner’s intelligent AI engine, which automatically transfers mining power to the highest-yielding assets, including BTC, ETH, DOGE, USDC, and more. Earnings will be paid daily in the cryptocurrency of your choice, providing a reliable source of income regardless of market fluctuations.
    Whether you are a novice or an experienced investor, the PBKMiner platform allows you to earn continuous cryptocurrency income anytime, anywhere.
    Why does PBKMiner’s XRP mining stand out?
    – Available to Everyone: No technical skills, no hardware, no complications — just click to earn.
    – XRP Native: Handle XRP from deposits to withdrawals in one ecosystem.
    – Smart, Stable Returns: AI Mining Strategies Deliver Stable Yields Across Assets.
    – Built-in Flexibility: Choose to mine XRP or diversify into other top cryptocurrencies — all from one contract.
    – Global Instant Access: Start mining securely from anywhere in the world via your browser or app.
    Start earning income in just three easy steps:
    1. Sign up Create an account and get a $10 welcome bonus.
    2. Choose a plan Choose a short-term or long-term contract (1-55 days available).
    3. Start earning Track your daily rewards and withdraw them in your preferred token.

    Main features of PBKMiners XRP cloud mining contract
    – Full XRP Ecosystem Integration: Deposit, mine, and withdraw XRP seamlessly on the platform.
    – Multi-currency mining support: Earn XRP, BTC, ETH, DOGE, USDC, USDT, SOL, LTC, BCH, and more.
    – AI Revenue Optimization: Proprietary algorithms optimize mining allocations for peak profitability.
    – 100% Remote Access: No hardware required – fully accessible via the PBKMiner app or browser.
    – Capital Protection: All contracts return full principal at expiration, minimizing risk while maximizing potential.
    Flexible mining contracts to meet various budget needs
    PBKMiner offers a variety of XRP-based cloud mining contracts designed for flexibility, predictable income, and effective risk management:
    $10 contract – 1 day – earn $0.6
    $100 contract – 2 days – earn $3.5 per day
    $500 contract – 5 days – earn $6.5 per day
    $5,000 contract – 30 days – earn $77.50 per day
    $30,000 contract – 50 days – earn $525.00 per day
    Whether you are investing for the first time or building a long-term portfolio, PBKMiner offers transparent, low-risk contracts that bring a steady daily XRP income.
    Click here to explore all XRP contracts.
    About PBKMiner
    Founded in 2019, PBKMiner represents a new generation of AI-driven cloud mining technology, with data, performance, and trust as pillars. The platform supports cloud mining of XRP, BTC, ETH, LTC, DOGE, and SOL. It has helped millions of users around the world earn passive crypto income through secure, AI-driven cloud mining. With the launch of XRP mining, the platform now combines retail-level accessibility with institutional-grade technology. Users can choose to mine XRP directly, or invest in the best performing digital assets – all in a secure, fully remote environment.
    A PBKMiner spokesperson said:
    “XRP has always been fast, efficient and scalable. Now, it can also be mined securely, remotely and profitably. We have removed all barriers so that anyone can participate in the future of XRP.”
    The market may rise and fall, but your mining income can remain stable. Especially suitable for investors who seek sustainable long-term returns rather than speculative gains.
    For full details and participation options please visit: https://pbkminer.com
    Disclaimer: The information provided in this press release does not constitute an investment solicitation, nor does it constitute investment advice, financial advice, or a trading recommendation. Cryptocurrency mining and staking involve risks and may result in the loss of funds. It is strongly recommended that you perform due diligence before investing or trading in cryptocurrencies and securities, including consulting a professional financial advisor.

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: £63 million lift-off for clean aviation fuels

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Press release

    £63 million lift-off for clean aviation fuels

    Winning 17 companies will share £63 million to accelerate sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) production and support 1,400 jobs in the UK.

    • 17 UK companies developing sustainable aviation fuel to receive share of new £63 million funding boost, supporting around 1,400 jobs  
    • latest investment builds on this year’s sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) drive, which will help position the UK as the world leader in homegrown sustainable aviation fuel production 
    • latest investment supports greenlighting of multiple airport expansion schemes to kickstart economic growth and deliver on our Plan for Change

    Passengers are a step closer to greener flights as the Aviation Minister today (22 July 2025) announced the 17 cutting-edge UK companies that will share £63 million to accelerate sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) production.  

    The boost will support around 1,400 jobs and secure Britain’s position as the global leader in the green aviation market – critical to provide the clean fuel that’s essential to realise sustainable growth in the aviation sector.  

    Today’s investment means government has provided £198 million to date through the Advanced Fuels Fund (AFF) to scale up cleaner aviation technologies. Creating a clean aviation ecosystem will help power the next generation of airport infrastructure and capacity scale up, kickstarting economic growth and delivering the UK’s clean energy superpower ambitions to deliver on the Plan for Change

    Low carbon fuel production could add up to £5 billion to the economy by 2050, position the UK as a global hub for SAF production and enable the UK to go further and faster with expansion plans.

    Aviation Minister, Mike Kane, said: 

    This £63 million is lift off for Britain’s green aviation revolution. We’re not just backing brilliant British innovation, we’re creating thousands of high-skilled jobs and positioning the UK at the forefront of the global sustainable aviation market.

    From the labs of Sheffield to the runways of the future – this is how we kickstart economic growth, secure energy independence and make Britain a clean energy superpower.

    SAF is an alternative to fossil jet fuel which reduces greenhouse gas emissions on average by 70% on a lifecycle basis, from feedstock to biofuel, making it the key technology that will allow UK aviation to grow capacity while achieving net zero commitments.  

    The SAF Bill will help secure the future of the aviation sector by boosting green fuel production in the UK and delivering cleaner flights. This bill will give investors the confidence to back sustainable aviation fuel production. It will help grow the sector, providing good green jobs and enabling the delivery of carbon savings. 

    Announcing the new funding at the University of Sheffield’s Energy Innovation Centre – which just received £1.5 million in this latest round – the Aviation Minister, Mike Kane, saw firsthand the groundbreaking work on aircraft engine testbeds and revolutionary aviation fuels.

    Professor Mohamed Pourkashanian, Managing Director of the University of Sheffield’s Energy Innovation Centre, who is leading the project, said:

    It is fantastic to see the University of Sheffield playing a leading role in the development of sustainable aviation fuel and supporting the aviation industry in its efforts to reduce its emissions. At Sheffield, we have some of the most advanced SAF research facilities in Europe and are excited to work with partners from the industry to help them test and develop new fuels and next generation clean energy technologies.

    The AFF winners include a range of companies and are spread across the country, such as OXCCU Tech, which is developing a demonstration plant at Oxford Airport, to LanzaJet, which is building a commercial-scale plant in Teesside.

    Andrew Symes, CEO and Co-Founder of OXCCU, said:

    Support from the Advanced Fuels Fund is a key step in scaling our technology. This funding enables the detailed design and construction of OX2, our demonstration plant launching in 2026, and builds on the successful delivery of OX1. It brings us closer to producing lower-cost, lower-carbon aviation fuel and supports the UK’s ambition to become a global leader in SAF production.

    Jimmy Samartzis, CEO of LanzaJet, said:

    We’re proud that Project Speedbird, developed in partnership with British Airways, has been recognised by the Department for Transport as part of its continued commitment to advancing SAF in the UK.

    This support demonstrates confidence in LanzaJet’s technology and the critical role ethanol-to-SAF can play in delivering economic growth, creating jobs and decarbonising air travel. Project Speedbird is vital to building a national SAF industry in the UK and to unlocking opportunity and innovation in the region.

    We thank DfT for its leadership and vision in accelerating the transition to net-zero aviation.

    Aviation, Europe and technology media enquiries

    Media enquiries 0300 7777 878

    Switchboard 0300 330 3000

    Updates to this page

    Published 22 July 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Boost in support for patients with chronic fatigue syndrome or ME

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Press release

    Boost in support for patients with chronic fatigue syndrome or ME

    Better care for patients living with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/ Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, with plans to invest in research and offer closer to home.

    • Better care closer to home for patients living with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/ Chronic Fatigue Syndrome
    • Plan outlines clear steps to improve care for patients, by investing in research and offering access to care in the community 

    • Actions build on government’s wider 10 Year Plan to rebuild the NHS and put patients’ needs at the heart of care

    Patients living with debilitating conditions are set to receive improved care closer to home, thanks to government plans published today. 

    The government has committed to changing attitudes and transforming care for patients with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/ Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/ CFS).

    The condition affects approximately 390,000 people in the UK, causing debilitating fatigue, sleep problems and difficulties with thinking, concentration and memory. The impact of this condition varies between cases, but severe ME/CFS, which is thought to affect a quarter of those diagnosed, leave patients housebound or unable to work.

    The plan published today provides the foundations for significant improvements in all key areas that affect people living with ME/CFS in England, many of whom currently struggle to access appropriate care tailored to their complex condition.

    As a priority, the plan will introduce new training for NHS healthcare professionals, featuring up-to-date learning resources to increase understand and ensure signs aren’t missed. This will help combat the stigma faced by people living with ME/CFS, which stems from a lack of awareness about the condition.

    The rollout of neighbourhood health services as set out in the government’s 10 Year Health Plan will also see ME/CFS patients able to access care closer to home, with specially-trained staff able to support those with complex needs.

    Minister for Public Health and Prevention, Ashley Dalton, said:  

    ME/CFS is a debilitating illness that can severely limit patients’ ability to participate in everyday activities, maintain employment, or enjoy family and social life.  

    Today’s plan will help tackle the stigma and lack of awareness of this condition through improved training for NHS staff.

    And through our neighbourhood health services, we will ensure patients suffering from the effects of ME/CFS can access quality care, closer to home, as pledged in our 10 Year Health Plan.

    Our Plan for Change is transforming how patients experience care and this plan represents a comprehensive approach to addressing the long-standing gaps in care and support for people with these conditions, with patient access to appropriate care at its heart.

    Sonya Chowdhury, Chief Executive, Action for ME said:

    This is an important step for the ME community, long overlooked and under-served. The Plan must not be a token gesture—it requires a sustained, strategic commitment to care, funding, and research. Without it, meaningful outcomes for people with ME will not be achieved.

    The plan includes increased funding for research, awarded through the National Institute for Health and Care Research, into how existing medicines can be used to for ME/CFS. This initiative aims to give patients access to a wider range of potential treatments.

    It will also address the specific needs of children and young people, ensuring they receive appropriate and timely support in education settings.  

    Recognising that ME/CFS affects people’s ability to work, the plan includes wider government initiatives to address issues with benefit assessment processes and provide support to help patients with long-term conditions and disabilities find and maintain meaningful employment where possible.  

    Offering care closer to home forms part of the government’s 10 Year Health Plan to rebuild the NHS, putting patients’ needs first and delivering effective, accessible treatment. 

    The government will continue to work with stakeholders and build on the foundations of actions in the Final Delivery Plan well beyond its publication, reaffirming our commitment to ongoing development and improvement. This all forms part of the government’s Plan for Change to build an NHS fit for the future and one which offers the highest-quality, personalised care.

    Updates to this page

    Published 22 July 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Miscarriages of justice victims given access to vital support

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Press release

    Miscarriages of justice victims given access to vital support

    Victims of miscarriages of justice will no longer lose out on key benefit support, thanks to legislative changes coming into force today [Tuesday 22 July].

    • Miscarriage of justice victims will no longer have their compensation counted when applying for benefits.
    • New legislation will unlock vital support for those victims, helping them back on their feet. 
    • Comes alongside boost to amount victims will be able to receive in compensation payments.
    • Justice for the wrongly convicted vital to Government’s ambition to restore trust in the system as part of Plan for Change.

    The change ensures that awarded compensation will no longer be taken into account when applying for means-tested benefits – such as Universal Credit, Pension Credit and Housing Benefit. 

    Until now, compensation for miscarriage of justice cases pushed some people over the savings limit for claiming certain benefits, leaving them ineligible for much-needed help. 

    To restore trust and fairness to our systems as part of the Plan for Change, the government is acting to ensure victims receive the support they deserve to rebuild their lives. 

    It comes after a campaign for rule changes to unlock benefit entitlement for those who have received miscarriage of justice compensation payments.

    Minister for Social Security and Disability, Sir Stephen Timms MP, said: 

    Rebuilding trust in our systems begins by restoring trust with those the system has failed.

    We can’t return the years lost by miscarriage of justice victims — but we can, and must, ensure they have every opportunity to restart their lives so they can make the most of the years ahead. 

    That’s why we’re bringing in this milestone legislation, and I encourage anyone who has received a miscarriage of justice compensation payment to come forward, so we can ensure they receive the help they are entitled to.

    The move comes as part of wider government action to restore justice and build trust in public services. 

    In a boost for victims, the Ministry of Justice recently announced an uplift to the amount a miscarriage of justice victim will be able to receive in compensation by 30%, raising the maximum payout to £1.3 million for long-term wrongful imprisonment. 

    Minister for Victims and Violence Against Women and Girls, Alex Davies-Jones, said: 

    Miscarriages of justice steal irreplaceable time and devastate lives. Better benefit support combined with the uplift of the compensation cap will make a real difference, providing not just financial redress but rightfully deserved recognition to individuals affected. 

    We can’t turn back the clock, but I hope these changes go some way in making the future brighter than the past for those who have already lost so much.

    It also follows similar legislation already in place to ensure compensation awarded to victims of the Infected Blood Scandal, Horizon Post Office scandal, and LGBT people dismissed from the Armed Forces, won’t affect their benefit entitlement. 

    Additional Information

    • The benefit disregard will apply to all compensation payments paid via the United Kingdom Government and Devolved Governments compensation schemes for miscarriage of justice.
    • The disregard scheme will exempt miscarriage of justice compensation payments when assessing eligibility for: income-based Jobseeker’s Allowance, income-related Employment and Support Allowance, Income Support, Housing Benefit, Pension Credit and Universal Credit. 
    • If you would like to know more about how this may affect you, or whether you may wish to consider making a claim to benefit, please see here.

    Updates to this page

    Published 22 July 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: MHRA announces proposals to improve access to world’s best medical devices for patients and to boost economic growth in Britain’s med tech sector

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Press release

    MHRA announces proposals to improve access to world’s best medical devices for patients and to boost economic growth in Britain’s med tech sector

    The MHRA has now published the government’s response to its public consultation on future routes to market for medical devices – designed to modernise regulation

    The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) has today announced important new steps to secure access for patients to the latest medical technologies available in Europe and other advanced countries.

    As well as improving patient access to technologies, the proposals will boost med tech industrial growth by reducing duplicative regulatory costs faced by manufacturers and instead focuses the domestic approvals route (UKCA) on first-in-market innovative technologies, including AI as a medical device.  

    The MHRA has now published the government’s response to its public consultation on future routes to market for medical devices in Great Britain (GB), designed to modernise regulation and improve patient access to the latest innovative technologies.

    In direct response to stakeholder feedback, the MHRA is also announcing its intention to consult later this year on the indefinite recognition of CE-marked medical devices.

    In parallel, new international reliance routes will be introduced to allow swifter access to medical devices from trusted regulators in Australia, Canada, and the United States. This will allow eligible products to follow a streamlined pathway to market, helping bring the latest technologies to patients more quickly.

    The MHRA will support removing the requirement for physical UKCA markings on products and packaging once unique device identification (UDI) requirements are in place. This will reduce barriers to entry to the market while strengthening traceability and safety monitoring.

    These measures reflect the government’s commitments in the UK’s Life Sciences Sector Plan and Industrial Strategy, and the 10 Year Health Plan for England, to reduce unwarranted barriers to market entry and to deliver transformative technologies to patients faster.

    Today’s announcement forms part of our broader regulatory reform programme for medical devices that will see improvements in patient safety through our new post-market surveillance requirements, the creation of streamlined and risk-proportionate routes for faster market entry for products that have already undergone assessment in comparator regions, and a refocusing of the UKCA domestic pathway on innovative technologies including AI.

    Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, Wes Streeting MP, said:

    Our 10-Year Health Plan will seize the opportunities provided by new technology, medicines and innovation to deliver better care for patients, whether these originate at home or abroad.

    It makes perfect sense that medical devices approved for use on patients in a country whose safety regulations we trust can also be used here – without red tape or bureaucracy delaying devices which can benefit NHS patients now.

    We will look around the world to bring the best life-saving devices to Britain quickly and safely and build a modern health service that is fit for the future.

    Minister of State for Science, Lord Patrick Vallance MP, said:

    The MHRA’s new international reliance routes are excellent news for patients, who will now gain rapid access to new medical devices which have been approved as safe by our trusted regulatory partners. This is precisely the sort of streamlining of red tape that the Life Sciences Sector Plan calls for.

    By making quick, informed, sensible decisions enabled by international reliance, the MHRA will be able to better target its resources, focusing on regulatory activity and scientific advice that will advance the development of innovative new medical products – ultimately helping patients, and supporting med tech businesses to grow.

    Lawrence Tallon, MHRA CEO, said:

    Our focus is on ensuring that patients benefit from the earliest possible access to safe and effective medical technologies that meet their needs and deliver significant clinical benefit.

    By reducing regulatory duplication, improving traceability and aligning with international best practice, we are delivering on the Government’s promise to make this the best place in the world to market medical devices and a global leader in life sciences.

    Professor Tom Clutton-Brock, Professor of Anaesthesia & Intensive Care Medicine at the University of Birmingham and Chair of the Interim Devices Working Group (an expert advisory committee to the MHRA), said:

    The proposed changes to the regulations represent the most significant advances since their original introduction. When enacted, we will lead the world in streamlining medical device approvals.

    The rapid advances in medical and healthcare technology make balancing the need for innovation against both short-term and long-term safety a real challenge.  After the EU exit there was a clear need to update our regulations to keep pace with other countries. After extensive consultation, the MHRA has listened carefully and published its response.

    Simplification for low-risk devices and the carefully controlled reliance and recognition of regulatory approval from other countries will support safe innovation. This will benefit patients, clinicians and our MedTech and HealthTech industries.

    The MHRA intends to notify the World Trade Organization of these changes later this year and will continue engaging with international partners and industry to implement the reforms. 

    Summary of the consultation response:

    The MHRA’s 2024 public consultation on medical device regulation focused on the following areas: international reliance, UKCA marking, and the regulation of in vitro diagnostic (IVD) devices.

    Measures being taken forward include:

    • International reliance routes will allow certain devices that have approvals or certifications from trusted regulators in Australia (TGA), Canada (Health Canada), and the United States (FDA) to follow a streamlined pathway to the GB market. This includes specific software and implantable devices that meet GB equivalence criteria.

    • The government will consult later this year on proposals to indefinitely recognise CE marked medical devices, which continue to be recognised in GB under existing transitional arrangements until 30 June 2028 or 2030 (depending on the device classification and legislation complied with).

    • Physical UKCA marking requirements will be removed once Unique Device Identification (UDI) is in place. This aims to reduce burdens on manufacturers while improving traceability and post-market surveillance.

    • Class B IVD devices will be subject to a more risk proportionate approach, requiring manufacturers to self-declare conformity with the Medical Devices Regulations 2002 and hold ISO 13485 quality management system certification before placing products on the GB market.

    The response to a fourth proposal, to extend four pieces of assimilated EU law, was published in February 2025 and has subsequently been actioned.

    Notes to Editors

    • The consultation response is available here: https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/consultation-on-medical-devices-regulations-routes-to-market-and-in-vitro-diagnostic-devices
    • The consultation, “Future regulation of medical devices and IVDs – routes to market”, ran from 30 November 2024 to 29 January 2025. It sought views on four legislative proposals to update the Medical Devices Regulations 2002 (as amended).
    • These reforms are part of a broader programme to modernise medical device regulation in Great Britain following the UK’s departure from the European Union. They align with the ambitions of the Government’s Life Sciences Sector Plan and 10-Year Plan for the NHS in England.
    • ISO 13485 is an internationally recognised standard that sets out requirements for a quality management system (QMS) specific to the medical device industry. It ensures that manufacturers demonstrate consistent design, development, production, and post-market support for medical devices.
    • The MHRA will publish further information in due course about the next steps, including updates on the planned Pre-Market Statutory Instrument and a future consultation on the indefinite recognition of CE-marked devices.
    • The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) is responsible for regulating all medicines and medical devices in the UK by ensuring they work and are acceptably safe. All our work is underpinned by robust and fact-based judgements to ensure that the benefits justify any risks.
    • The MHRA is an executive agency of the Department of Health and Social Care.

    For media enquiries, please contact the newscentre@mhra.gov.uk, or call on 020 3080 7651.

    Updates to this page

    Published 22 July 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI: JA Mining Launches Enhanced Cloud Miners Platform for Daily Earnings on XRP and BTC

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    London, United Kingdom, July 21, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — JA Mining, a UK-registered cloud mining platform, has officially launched a new feature enabling users to earn daily returns through cloud miners based on major cryptocurrencies like XRP and Bitcoin. The upgrade reflects the company’s commitment to making digital asset participation simple, efficient, and globally accessible.

    With momentum shifting toward structured digital asset investments, platforms offering daily returns and price-based upside are gaining attention. Among them, JA Mining, a global cloud mining service provider, is emerging as a preferred choice for investors seeking stable, low-risk crypto income.

    JA Mining supports investments in major cryptocurrencies such as XRP, Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Dogecoin, while all contracts are denominated in USD for transparency and predictability. Users earn fixed daily returns based on the selected contract terms, and at the end of the term, they may benefit additionally if the value of their deposited assets appreciates.

    Mining Contract Examples (Updated July 2025)

    LTC Classic Miner – $200 | 2 Days | $7/day → Total: $14

    DOGE Innovative Miner – $2,420 | 3 Days | $86.88/day → Total: $260.63

    DOGE Quality Choice – $12,500 | 3 Days | $535/day → Total: $1,605

    BTC Intelligent Innovation – $55,600 | 2 Days | $4,770/day → Total: $9,540.96

    BTC Efficient & Excellent – $258,000 | 5 Days | $24,664.80/day → Total: $123,324

    For more plans, please visit the official website: https://jamining.com

    These earnings are automatically distributed on a daily basis via smart contract settlements. The system does not require hardware or technical skills from the user, making cloud mining with daily earnings accessible to a broader investor base.

    JA Mining has positioned itself at the intersection of compliance, automation, and accessibility. The platform operates internationally, integrating energy-efficient mining infrastructure and user-friendly dashboards that enable real-time earnings tracking. Investments can be made through web or mobile interfaces using XRP or other supported cryptocurrencies.

    “JA Mining’s model of combining fixed returns with potential asset appreciation aligns with the market’s growing preference for balanced and structured crypto exposure,” the company stated in an official release. “As institutional and retail interest in XRP and other digital assets grows, demand for simplified and transparent yield models will continue to rise.”

    JA Mining’s approach reflects a broader industry shift: away from high-volatility speculation, and toward regulated, algorithmic income strategies that prioritize user stability.

    Start now, no need to wait: click to download the APP and register to get $100 to start 0 cost mining

    Media Contact:

    JA Mining

    info@jamining.com

    www.jamining.com

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: JA Mining Launches Enhanced Cloud Miners Platform for Daily Earnings on XRP and BTC

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    London, United Kingdom, July 21, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — JA Mining, a UK-registered cloud mining platform, has officially launched a new feature enabling users to earn daily returns through cloud miners based on major cryptocurrencies like XRP and Bitcoin. The upgrade reflects the company’s commitment to making digital asset participation simple, efficient, and globally accessible.

    With momentum shifting toward structured digital asset investments, platforms offering daily returns and price-based upside are gaining attention. Among them, JA Mining, a global cloud mining service provider, is emerging as a preferred choice for investors seeking stable, low-risk crypto income.

    JA Mining supports investments in major cryptocurrencies such as XRP, Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Dogecoin, while all contracts are denominated in USD for transparency and predictability. Users earn fixed daily returns based on the selected contract terms, and at the end of the term, they may benefit additionally if the value of their deposited assets appreciates.

    Mining Contract Examples (Updated July 2025)

    LTC Classic Miner – $200 | 2 Days | $7/day → Total: $14

    DOGE Innovative Miner – $2,420 | 3 Days | $86.88/day → Total: $260.63

    DOGE Quality Choice – $12,500 | 3 Days | $535/day → Total: $1,605

    BTC Intelligent Innovation – $55,600 | 2 Days | $4,770/day → Total: $9,540.96

    BTC Efficient & Excellent – $258,000 | 5 Days | $24,664.80/day → Total: $123,324

    For more plans, please visit the official website: https://jamining.com

    These earnings are automatically distributed on a daily basis via smart contract settlements. The system does not require hardware or technical skills from the user, making cloud mining with daily earnings accessible to a broader investor base.

    JA Mining has positioned itself at the intersection of compliance, automation, and accessibility. The platform operates internationally, integrating energy-efficient mining infrastructure and user-friendly dashboards that enable real-time earnings tracking. Investments can be made through web or mobile interfaces using XRP or other supported cryptocurrencies.

    “JA Mining’s model of combining fixed returns with potential asset appreciation aligns with the market’s growing preference for balanced and structured crypto exposure,” the company stated in an official release. “As institutional and retail interest in XRP and other digital assets grows, demand for simplified and transparent yield models will continue to rise.”

    JA Mining’s approach reflects a broader industry shift: away from high-volatility speculation, and toward regulated, algorithmic income strategies that prioritize user stability.

    Start now, no need to wait: click to download the APP and register to get $100 to start 0 cost mining

    Media Contact:

    JA Mining

    info@jamining.com

    www.jamining.com

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: The UK is committed to achieving our shared goals for sustainable development: UK National statement at the High-level Political Forum on Sustainable Development

    Source: United Kingdom – Government Statements

    Speech

    The UK is committed to achieving our shared goals for sustainable development: UK National statement at the High-level Political Forum on Sustainable Development

    Statement by Lord Collins of Highbury, Minister for Africa and the UN, at the High-level Political Forum on Sustainable Development.

    As we mark the 80th anniversary of the United Nations, the United Kingdom is committed to working with you to achieve our shared goals for sustainable development.

    With targets way off track, and five years to go, through the Pact for the Future, we have all committed to picking up the pace.

    So, we must implement the shared vision we set out at the Financing for Development in Seville.

    Harnessing the power of the private sector.

    Raising revenue from domestic taxation and tackling illicit finance.

    Making sure ODA plays a catalytic role.

    With a roadmap to address unsustainable debt.

    And the United Kingdom is championing innovative financing instruments, leveraging the City of London expertise.

    This is part of how we renew confidence in multilateralism itself, but we also need a system that is more efficient, coherent and resilient.

    That’s why, the UK is backing the Secretary General’s UN at 80 initiative, calling for the ambitious reform needed to build a development system fit for the future.

    We are transforming the UK’s approach.

    Prioritising climate and nature, health, humanitarian assistance, and making sure everyone feels the benefits, including women and girls.

    Improving the systems every country needs to invest in public services that make a difference in people’s lives.

    And protecting the health of people and economies from backing ambition on Non-Communicable Diseases, to pledging further support for the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunisation, and co-hosting the Global Fund replenishment alongside South Africa.

    The last few months alone have seen success spanning Seville to the UN Ocean Conference. 

    So, be it the General Assembly, or COP30 in Brazil, let us make the most of opportunities to build on that, so we get back on track towards meeting the Sustainable Development Goals, in the months and years ahead.

    Thank you.

    Updates to this page

    Published 21 July 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI: IDEX Biometrics ASA – Fully Underwritten Private Placement successfully placed – 21 July 2025

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    NOT FOR RELEASE, PUBLICATION OR DISTRIBUTION, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, IN OR INTO AUSTRALIA, CANADA, HONG KONG, JAPAN OR THE UNITED STATES OR ANY OTHER JURISDICTION IN WHICH THE RELEASE, PUBLICATION OR DISTRIBUTION WOULD BE UNLAWFUL. THIS ANNOUNCEMENT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN OFFER OF ANY OF THE SECURITIES DESCRIBED HEREIN.

    Oslo, Norway, 21 July 2025.

    Reference is made to the stock exchange announcement published earlier today on 21 July 2025 by IDEX Biometrics ASA (“IDEX” or the “Company”) regarding a contemplated underwritten private placement (the “Private Placement”) of new shares in the Company (the “Offer Shares”), where Arctic Securities AS has acted as manager and bookrunner (the “Manager”).

    The Private Placement has been successfully completed, raising gross proceeds to the Company of NOK 30,000,000, through the issuance of 9,090,909 Offer Shares at a subscription price per Offer Share of NOK 3.30 (the “Offer Price”).

    The net proceeds from the Private Placement will be used for the Company’s commercialization efforts in line with the new business strategy announced in March 2025 as well as for general corporate purposes.

    Altea AS, Pinchcliffe AS (closely associated company of the CEO and CFO, Anders Storbråten), Anders Storbråten, Charles Street International Ltd. (Robert Keith) and K-Konsult AS (closely associated company of the chairperson of the board of directors, Morten Opstad) (the “Underwriters”) had, subject to customary conditions, accepted to be allocated Offer Shares that were not applied for during the Application Period (as defined herein) for up to NOK 30,000,000 pursuant to an underwriting agreement entered into with the Company (the “UWA”). An underwriting fee equal to 5% of the underwriting commitment by each Underwriter will be payable by the Company to each of the Underwriters in the form of a total of 454,542 new shares in the Company (the “Underwriting Shares”), subject to the approval and issuance of the Underwriting Shares by the EGM (as defined herein).

    The Private Placement was divided into two tranches: Tranche 1 (“Tranche 1”) consisted of 4,731,594 Offer Shares, and the share capital increase related to Tranche 1 have been resolved by the board of directors (the “Board”) pursuant to an authorization granted by the Company’s general meeting held on 21 May 2025 (the “Authorization”). Tranche 2 (“Tranche 2”) will consist of the number of Offer Shares that, together with the Tranche 1 shares, is necessary in order to raise gross proceeds of NOK 30 million. The issuance of Offer Shares in Tranche 2 remains subject to approval by an extraordinary general meeting, scheduled to be held on or about 14 August 2025 (the “EGM”). Applicants will receive a pro rata portion of shares from Tranche 1 and Tranche 2 based on their overall allocation in the Private Placement, with the exception of the Underwriters, which have agreed that the new shares it is allocated in the Private Placement will all be allocated in Tranche 2.

    The completion of Tranche 1 is otherwise subject to (i) the Share Lending Agreement and the UWA remaining in full force and effect (“Tranche 1 Conditions”). The completion of Tranche 2 is subject to (i) completion of Tranche 1, (ii) approval by the EGM and (iii) the Share Lending Agreement and the UWA remaining in full force and effect (“Tranche 2 Conditions”). Both the Tranche 1 Conditions and the Tranche 2 Conditions include the share capital increase pertaining to the issuance of the allocated Offer Shares under such tranche being validly registered with the Norwegian Register of Business Enterprises and the allocated Offer Shares being validly issued and registered in the Norwegian Central Securities Depository Euronext Securities Oslo (“VPS”). Completion of Tranche 1 is not conditional upon completion of Tranche 2, and acquisition of shares in Tranche 1 will remain final and binding and cannot be revoked or terminated by the respective applicants if Tranche 2 is not completed. The Board reserves the right to cancel, and/or modify the terms of the Private Placement, at any time and for any reason prior to delivery of the Offer Shares in Tranche 1, without or on short notice. The applicant acknowledges that Tranche 1 and Tranche 2 of the Private Placement will be cancelled if the relevant conditions for such tranches (or issuance) are not fulfilled, and may be cancelled by the Board in its sole discretion for any other reason whatsoever prior to delivery of the Offer Shares in Tranche 1. Neither the Manager nor the Company will be liable for any losses if the Private Placement is cancelled or modified, irrespective of the reason for such cancellation or modification.

    Following completion of Tranche 1, the Company’s share capital will be NOK 52,095,850 divided into 52,095,850 shares, each with a par value of NOK 1.00. Following completion of Tranche 2 of the Private Placement and issuance of the Underwriting Shares, both subject to EGM approval, the Company’s share capital will be NOK 56,909,707 divided into 56,909,707 shares, each with a par value of NOK 1.00.

    The Private Placement (Tranche 1 and Tranche 2) will be settled with existing and unencumbered shares in the Company that are already listed on the Oslo Stock Exchange, pursuant to a share lending agreement entered into between the Company, the Manager and an existing shareholder (the “Share Lending Agreement”). The Share Lending Agreement will be settled with the new shares in the Company issued by the Board pursuant to the Authorization (as described above) and issued by the EGM, as applicable.

    Settlement of Tranche 1 of the Private Placement is expected to take place on a delivery versus payment basis on or about 24 July 2025. Settlement of Tranche 2 of the Private Placement is expected to take place on a delivery versus payment basis on or about 18 August 2025.

    The Board has considered the contemplated Private Placement in light of the equal treatment obligations under the Norwegian Securities Trading Act and Oslo Børs’ Circular no. 2/2014 and deems that the Private Placement is in compliance with these requirements. The Board holds the view that it will be in the common interest of the Company and its shareholders to raise equity through a private placement, in view of the current market conditions and the growth opportunities currently available to the Company. A private placement enables the Company to raise capital in an efficient manner, and the Private Placement is structured to ensure that a market-based subscription price is achieved.

    Taking into consideration that the Private Placement was conducted as a publicly announced bookbuilding process and a market-based subscription price was achieved, the Board has concluded that a subsequent offering towards existing shareholders is not necessary.

    This information is considered to be inside information pursuant to the EU Market Abuse Regulation (MAR) and is subject to the disclosure requirements pursuant to MAR article 17 and section 5 -12 of the Norwegian Securities Trading Act. This stock exchange release was published by Kjell-Arne Besseberg, Chief Operating Officer, on 21 July 2025 at 23:15 CEST.

    About IDEX Biometrics ASA

    IDEX Biometrics ASA (OSE: IDEX) is a global technology leader in fingerprint biometrics, offering authentication solutions across payments, access control, and digital identity. Our solutions bring convenience, security, peace of mind and seamless user experiences to the world. Built on patented and proprietary sensor technologies, integrated circuit designs, and software, our biometric solutions target card-based applications for payments and digital authentication. As an industry-enabler we partner with leading card manufacturers and technology companies to bring our solutions to market.

    Important information:

    This announcement is not and does not form a part of any offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to purchase, any securities of the Company. The distribution of this announcement and other information may be restricted by law in certain jurisdictions. Copies of this announcement are not being made and may not be distributed or sent into any jurisdiction in which such distribution would be unlawful or would require registration or other measures. Persons into whose possession this announcement or such other information should come are required to inform themselves about and to observe any such restrictions.

    The securities referred to in this announcement have not been and will not be registered under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and accordingly may not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration or an applicable exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act and in accordance with applicable U.S. state securities laws. The Company does not intend to register any part of the offering or its securities in the United States or to conduct a public offering of securities in the United States. Any sale in the United States of the securities mentioned in this announcement will be made solely to “qualified institutional buyers” as defined in Rule 144A under the Securities Act.

    In any EEA Member State, this communication is only addressed to and is only directed at qualified investors in that Member State within the meaning of the EU Prospectus Regulation, i.e., only to investors who can receive the offer without an approved prospectus in such EEA Member State. The expression “EU Prospectus Regulation” means Regulation 2017/1129 as amended together with any applicable implementing measures in any Member State.

    This communication is only being distributed to and is only directed at persons in the United Kingdom that are (i) investment professionals falling within Article 19(5) of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005, as amended (the “Order”) or (ii) high net worth entities, and other persons to whom this announcement may lawfully be communicated, falling within Article 49(2)(a) to (d) of the Order (all such persons together being referred to as “relevant persons”). This communication must not be acted on or relied on by persons who are not relevant persons. Any investment or investment activity to which this communication relates is available only for relevant persons and will be engaged in only with relevant persons. Persons distributing this communication must satisfy themselves that it is lawful to do so.

    Matters discussed in this announcement may constitute forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical facts and may be identified by words such as “believe”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “strategy”, “intends”, “estimate”, “will”, “may”, “continue”, “should” and similar expressions. The forward-looking statements in this release are based upon various assumptions, many of which are based, in turn, upon further assumptions. Although the Company believes that these assumptions were reasonable when made, these assumptions are inherently subject to significant known and unknown risks, uncertainties, contingencies and other important factors which are difficult or impossible to predict and are beyond its control.

    Actual events may differ significantly from any anticipated development due to a number of factors, including without limitation, changes in investment levels and need for the Company’s services, changes in the general economic, political and market conditions in the markets in which the Company operate, the Company’s ability to attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel, changes in the Company’s ability to engage in commercially acceptable acquisitions and strategic investments, and changes in laws and regulation and the potential impact of legal proceedings and actions. Such risks, uncertainties, contingencies and other important factors could cause actual events to differ materially from the expectations expressed or implied in this release by such forward-looking statements. The Company does not provide any guarantees that the assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements in this announcement are free from errors nor does it accept any responsibility for the future accuracy of the opinions expressed in this announcement or any obligation to update or revise the statements in this announcement to reflect subsequent events. You should not place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements in this document.

    The information, opinions and forward-looking statements contained in this announcement speak only as at its date, and are subject to change without notice. The Company does not undertake any obligation to review, update, confirm, or to release publicly any revisions to any forward-looking statements to reflect events that occur or circumstances that arise in relation to the content of this announcement.

    Neither the Manager nor any of their affiliates make any representation as to the accuracy or completeness of this announcement and none of them accepts any responsibility for the contents of this announcement or any matters referred to herein.

    This announcement is for information purposes only and is not to be relied upon in substitution for the exercise of independent judgment. It is not intended as investment advice and under no circumstances is it to be used or considered as an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy any securities or a recommendation to buy or sell any securities in the Company. Neither the Manager nor any of their affiliates accept any liability arising from the use of this announcement.

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI USA: PHOTOS: Senator Peters Attends Ceremony Rededicating the Mt. Clemens Post Office as the “Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Jefferson Post Office”

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Michigan Gary Peters

    MT. CLEMENS, MI – U.S. Senator Gary Peters (MI) attended a ceremony to rededicate the Mt. Clemens Post Office as the “Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Jefferson Post Office.” In 2024, Peters led legislation signed into law dedicating the post office in Lt. Col. Jefferson’s name to recognize his service as a member of the famous Tuskegee Airmen of the U.S. Army Air Forces with the 332nd Fighter Group during World War II, a U.S. Postal Service letter carrier, and an educator with Detroit Public Schools.

    “Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Jefferson served his country with distinction with the Tuskegee Airmen, and cemented himself in local history as a dedicated educator and letter carrier,” said Senator Peters. “I was proud to lead legislation dedicating the Mount Clemens post office in his name, helping to ensure his life and legacy are remembered for future generations.”

    “We honor Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Jefferson by dedicating the Mt. Clemens Post Office building for his dedicated service to his country as one of the Tuskegee Airmen,” said Rick Moreton, USPS District Manager, Michigan One. “Dedicating the plaque, which will be placed in the post office lobby, we have an obligation in the Postal Service to preserve his memory for the community, his students, his family and those that were personally touched by Alexander Jefferson’s sacrifice.”

    Below are photos of Senator Peters at today’s ceremony alongside members of Lt. Col. Jefferson’s family, representatives of the Detroit Chapter of Tuskegee Airmen, and local elected officials.

    Alexander Jefferson was born in Detroit, Michigan in 1921. Jefferson completed combat training at Selfridge Field in Mount Clemens and pilot training at the Tuskegee Army Airfield. He served in the military during World War II. During his time with the Tuskegee Airmen, Jefferson was shot down in France and captured by Nazi ground troops. He was a prisoner of war in German-occupied Poland before he was freed by General George Patton’s U.S. Third Army. Jefferson returned to Michigan, where he became a U.S. Postal Service letter carrier, earned a teaching certificate, and obtained a master’s degree in education from Wayne State University. He was discharged from active duty in 1947 and retired from the Reserves in 1969 with the rank of Lieutenant Colonel.

    Jefferson taught elementary school science in Detroit, was appointed assistant principal, and retired in 1979 after 31 years of service to Detroit Public Schools. In 2016, Senator Peters helped honor Jefferson at a ceremony for France’s Knight of the Legion of Honor Medal. This award is the highest honor France bestows on people who have carried out actions of great value to their nation.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI: NXP Semiconductors Reports Second Quarter 2025 Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    EINDHOVEN, The Netherlands, July 21, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — NXP Semiconductors N.V. (NASDAQ: NXPI) today reported financial results for the second quarter, which ended June 29, 2025. “NXP delivered quarterly revenue of $2.93 billion, above the midpoint of our guidance, with all our focus end-markets performing above expectations. Our guidance for the third quarter reflects the combination of an emerging cyclical improvement in NXP’s core end markets as well as the performance of our company specific growth drivers. We continue to drive solid profitability and earnings, by strengthening our competitive portfolio and by aligning our wafer fabrication footprint consistent with our hybrid manufacturing strategy,” said Kurt Sievers, NXP Chief Executive Officer.

    Key Highlights for the Second Quarter 2025:

    • Revenue was $2.93 billion, down 6 percent year-on-year;
    • GAAP gross margin was 53.4 percent, GAAP operating margin was 23.5 percent and GAAP diluted Net Income per Share was $1.75;
    • Non-GAAP gross margin was 56.5 percent, non-GAAP operating margin was 32.0 percent, and non-GAAP diluted Net Income per Share was $2.72;
    • Cash flow from operations was $779 million, with net capex investments of $83 million, resulting in non-GAAP free cash flow of $696 million;
    • Capital return during the quarter was $461 million, representing 66 percent of second quarter non-GAAP free cash flow. Share buybacks were $204 million and dividends paid during the quarter were $257 million;
    • On May 8, 2025, NXP announced its third generation imaging processors for Level 2+ to Level 4 Autonomous Driving. The new S32R47 imaging radar processors in 16 nm FinFET technology, delivers up to twice the processing power versus the previous generation, building upon NXP’s proven expertise and global market leadership in the automotive radar market;
    • On June 12, 2025, NXP and Rimac Technology announced the co-development of a software defined vehicle (SDV) architecture for advanced automotive domain and zonal control. The jointly developed solution features NXP’s S32E2 processors, which are part of NXP’s comprehensive S32 Automotive Processing Platform. The S32E addresses the vehicle’s need for high-performance deterministic real-time domain and zonal control in a multi-applications environment; and
    • On June 17, 2025, NXP announced the completion of the acquisition of TTTech Auto, a leader in innovating unique safety-critical systems and middleware for software-defined vehicles (SDVs), pursuant to the terms of the previously announced agreement from January 2025.

    Summary of Reported Second Quarter 2025 ($ millions, unaudited) (1)

      Q2 2025 Q1 2025 Q2 2024 Q – Q Y – Y
    Total Revenue $ 2,926   $ 2,835   $ 3,127     3%     -6%  
    GAAP Gross Profit $ 1,562   $ 1,560   $ 1,792     —%     -13%  
    Gross Profit Adjustments(i) $ (90 ) $ (31 ) $ (41 )    
    Non-GAAP Gross Profit $ 1,652   $ 1,591   $ 1,833     4%     -10%  
    GAAP Gross Margin   53.4 %   55.0 %   57.3 %    
    Non-GAAP Gross Margin   56.5 %   56.1 %   58.6 %    
    GAAP Operating Income (Loss) $ 687   $ 723   $ 896     -5%     -23%  
    Operating Income Adjustments(i) $ (248 ) $ (181 ) $ (175 )    
    Non-GAAP Operating Income $ 935   $ 904   $ 1,071     3%     -13%  
    GAAP Operating Margin   23.5 %   25.5 %   28.7 %    
    Non-GAAP Operating Margin   32.0 %   31.9 %   34.3 %    
    GAAP Net Income (Loss) attributable to Stockholders $ 445   $ 490   $ 658     -9%     -32%  
    Net Income Adjustments(i) $ (245 ) $ (183 ) $ (171 )    
    Non-GAAP Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Stockholders $ 690   $ 673   $ 829     3%     -17%  
    GAAP diluted Net Income (Loss) per Share(ii) $ 1.75   $ 1.92   $ 2.54     -9%     -31%  
    Non-GAAP diluted Net Income (Loss) per Share(ii) $ 2.72   $ 2.64   $ 3.20     3%     -15%  
    Additional information          
      Q2 2025 Q1 2025 Q2 2024 Q – Q Y – Y
    Automotive $ 1,729   $ 1,674   $ 1,728     3%     —%  
    Industrial & IoT $ 546   $ 508   $ 616     7%     -11%  
    Mobile $ 331   $ 338   $ 345     -2%     -4%  
    Comm. Infra. & Other $ 320   $ 315   $ 438     2%     -27%  
    DIO   158     169     148      
    DPO   60     62     64      
    DSO   33     34     27      
    Cash Conversion Cycle   131     141     111      
    Channel Inventory (weeks)   9     9     7      
    Gross Financial Leverage(iii)   2.4x     2.4x     1.9x      
    Net Financial Leverage(iv)   1.8x     1.6x     1.3x      
                           
    1. Additional Information for the Second Quarter 2025:
      1. For an explanation of GAAP to non-GAAP adjustments, please see “Non-GAAP Financial Measures”.
      2. Refer to Table 1 below for the weighted average number of diluted shares for the presented periods.
      3. Gross financial leverage is defined as gross debt divided by trailing twelve months adjusted EBITDA.
      4. Net financial leverage is defined as net debt divided by trailing twelve months adjusted EBITDA.
      5. Guidance for the Third Quarter 2025: ($ millions, except Per Share data) (1)

           
          GAAP   Reconciliation   non-GAAP
          Low   Mid   High       Low   Mid   High
        Total Revenue   $3,050       $3,150       $3,250           $3,050       $3,150       $3,250  
        Q-Q   4%       8%       11%           4%       8%       11%  
        Y-Y   -6%       -3%       —%           -6%       -3%       —%  
        Gross Profit   $1,691       $1,764       $1,837       $(32)       $1,723       $1,796       $1,869  
        Gross Margin   55.4%       56.0%       56.5%           56.5%       57.0%       57.5%  
        Operating Income (loss)   $818       $881       $944       $(180)       $998       $1,061       $1,124  
        Operating Margin   26.8%       28.0%       29.0%           32.7%       33.7%       34.6%  
        Financial Income (expense)   $(101)       $(101)       $(101)       $(10)       $(91)       $(91)       $(91)  
        Tax rate 18.3%-19.3%       17.0%-18.0%
        Equity-accounted investees   $(5)       $(5)       $(5)       $(4)       $(1)       $(1)       $(1)  
        Non-controlling interests   $(14)       $(14)       $(14)           $(14)       $(14)       $(14)  
        Shares – diluted   253.8       253.8       253.8               253.8       253.8       253.8  
        Earnings Per Share – diluted   $2.22       $2.42       $2.62               $2.89       $3.10       $3.30  
                                                               

        Note (1) Additional Information:

        1. GAAP Gross Profit is expected to include Purchase Price Accounting (“PPA”) effects, $(7) million; Share-based Compensation, $(15) million; Other Incidentals, $(10) million;
        2. GAAP Operating Income (loss) is expected to include PPA effects, $(40) million; Share-based Compensation, $(116) million; Restructuring and Other Incidentals, $(24) million;
        3. GAAP Financial Income (expense) is expected to include Other financial expense $(10) million;
        4. GAAP Results relating to equity-accounted investees is expected to include results relating to non-foundry equity-accounted investees $(4) million;
        5. GAAP diluted EPS is expected to include the adjustments noted above for PPA effects, Share-based Compensation, Restructuring and Other Incidentals in GAAP Operating Income (loss), the adjustment for Other financial expense, the adjustment for results relating to non-foundry equity-accounted investees and the adjustment on Tax due to the earlier mentioned adjustments.

        NXP has based the guidance included in this release on judgments and estimates that management believes are reasonable given its assessment of historical trends and other information reasonably available as of the date of this release. Please note, the guidance included in this release consists of predictions only, and is subject to a wide range of known and unknown risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond NXP’s control. The guidance included in this release should not be regarded as representations by NXP that the estimated results will be achieved. Actual results may vary materially from the guidance we provide today. In relation to the use of non-GAAP financial information see the note regarding “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” below. For the factors, risks, and uncertainties to which judgments, estimates and forward-looking statements generally are subject see the note regarding “Forward-looking Statements.” We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, including the guidance set forth herein, to reflect future events or circumstances.

        Non-GAAP Financial Measures

        In managing NXP’s business on a consolidated basis, management develops an annual operating plan, which is approved by our Board of Directors, using non-GAAP financial measures, that are not in accordance with, nor an alternative to, U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). In measuring performance against this plan, management considers the actual or potential impacts on these non-GAAP financial measures from actions taken to reduce costs with the goal of increasing our gross margin and operating margin and when assessing appropriate levels of research and development efforts. In addition, management relies upon these non-GAAP financial measures when making decisions about product spending, administrative budgets, and other operating expenses. We believe that these non-GAAP financial measures, when coupled with the GAAP results and the reconciliations to corresponding GAAP financial measures, provide a more complete understanding of the Company’s results of operations and the factors and trends affecting NXP’s business. We believe that they enable investors to perform additional comparisons of our operating results, to assess our liquidity and capital position and to analyze financial performance excluding the effect of expenses unrelated to core operating performance, certain non-cash expenses and share-based compensation expense, which may obscure trends in NXP’s underlying performance. This information also enables investors to compare financial results between periods where certain items may vary independent of business performance, and allow for greater transparency with respect to key metrics used by management.

        These non-GAAP financial measures are provided in addition to, and not as a substitute for, or superior to, measures of financial performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. The presentation of these and other similar items in NXP’s non-GAAP financial results should not be interpreted as implying that these items are non-recurring, infrequent, or unusual. Reconciliations of these non-GAAP measures to the most comparable measures calculated in accordance with GAAP are provided in the financial statements portion of this release in a schedule entitled “Financial Reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP Results (unaudited).” Please refer to the NXP Historic Financial Model file found on the Financial Information page of the Investor Relations section of our website at https://investors.nxp.com for additional information related to our rationale for using these non-GAAP financial measures, as well as the impact of these measures on the presentation of NXP’s operations.

        In addition to providing financial information on a basis consistent with GAAP, NXP also provides the following selected financial measures on a non-GAAP basis: (i) Gross profit, (ii) Gross margin, (iii) Research and development, (iv) Selling, general and administrative, (v) Amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets, (vi) Other income, (vii) Operating income (loss), (viii) Operating margin, (ix) Financial Income (expense), (x) Income tax benefit (provision), (xi) Results relating to non-foundry equity-accounted investees, (xii) Net income (loss) attributable to stockholders, (xiii) Earnings per Share – Diluted, (xiv) EBITDA, adjusted EBITDA and trailing 12 month adjusted EBITDA, and (xv) free cash flow, trailing 12 month free cash flow and trailing 12 month free cash flow as a percent of Revenue. The non-GAAP information excludes, where applicable, the amortization of acquisition related intangible assets, the purchase accounting effect on inventory and property, plant and equipment, merger related costs (including integration costs), certain items related to divestitures, share-based compensation expense, restructuring and asset impairment charges, extinguishment of debt, foreign exchange gains and losses, income tax effect on adjustments described above and results from non-foundry equity-accounted investments.

        The difference in the benefit (provision) for income taxes between our GAAP and non-GAAP results relates to the income tax effects of the GAAP to non-GAAP adjustments that we make and the income tax effect of any discrete items that occur in the interim period. Discrete items primarily relate to unexpected tax events that may occur as these amounts cannot be forecasted (e.g., the impact of changes in tax law and/or rates, changes in estimates or resolved tax audits relating to prior year tax provisions, the excess or deficit tax effects on share-based compensation, etc.).

        Conference Call and Webcast Information

        The company will host a conference call with the financial community on Tuesday, July 22, 2025 at 8:00 a.m. U.S. Eastern Daylight Time (EDT) to review the second quarter 2025 results in detail.

        Interested parties may preregister to obtain a user-specific access code for the call here.

        The call will be webcast and can be accessed from the NXP Investor Relations website at www.nxp.com. A replay of the call will be available on the NXP Investor Relations website within 24 hours of the actual call.

        About NXP Semiconductors

        NXP Semiconductors N.V. (NASDAQ: NXPI) is the trusted partner for innovative solutions in the automotive, industrial & IoT, mobile, and communications infrastructure markets. NXP’s “Brighter Together” approach combines leading-edge technology with pioneering people to develop system solutions that make the connected world better, safer, and more secure. The company has operations in more than 30 countries and posted revenue of $12.61 billion in 2024. Find out more at www.nxp.com.

        Forward-looking Statements

        This document includes forward-looking statements which include statements regarding NXP’s business strategy, financial condition, results of operations, market data, as well as any other statements which are not historical facts. By their nature, forward-looking statements are subject to numerous factors, risks and uncertainties that could cause actual outcomes and results to be materially different from those projected. These factors, risks and uncertainties include the following: market demand and semiconductor industry conditions; our ability to successfully introduce new technologies and products; the demand for the goods into which NXP’s products are incorporated; global trade disputes, potential increase of barriers to international trade, including the imposition of new or increased tariffs, and resulting disruptions to our established supply chains; the impact of government actions and regulations, including as a result of executive orders, including restrictions on the export of products and technology; increasing and evolving cybersecurity threats and privacy risks; our ability to accurately estimate demand and match our production capacity accordingly or obtain supplies from third-party producers; our access to production capacity from third-party outsourcing partners, and any events that might affect their business or our relationship with them; our ability to secure adequate and timely supply of equipment and materials from suppliers; our ability to avoid operational problems and product defects and, if such issues were to arise, to correct them quickly; our ability to form strategic partnerships and joint ventures and to successfully cooperate with our strategic alliance partners; our ability to win competitive bid selection processes; our ability to develop products for use in customers’ equipment and products; our ability to successfully hire and retain key management and senior product engineers; global hostilities, including the invasion of Ukraine by Russia and resulting regional instability, sanctions and any other retaliatory measures taken against Russia and the continued hostilities and the armed conflict in the Middle East, which could adversely impact the global supply chain, disrupt our operations or negatively impact the demand for our products in our primary end markets; our ability to maintain good relationships with our suppliers; our ability to integrate acquired businesses in an efficient and effective manner; our ability to generate sufficient cash, raise sufficient capital or refinance corporate debt at or before maturity to meet both NXP’s debt service and research and development and capital investment requirements; and a change in tax laws could have an effect on our estimated effective tax rates. In addition, this document contains information concerning the semiconductor industry, our end markets and business generally, which is forward-looking in nature and is based on a variety of assumptions regarding the ways in which the semiconductor industry, our end markets and business will develop. NXP has based these assumptions on information currently available, if any one or more of these assumptions turn out to be incorrect, actual results may differ from those predicted. While NXP does not know what impact any such differences may have on its business, if there are such differences, its future results of operations and its financial condition could be materially adversely affected. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak to results only as of the date the statements were made. Except for any ongoing obligation to disclose material information as required by the United States federal securities laws, NXP does not have any intention or obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements after we distribute this document, whether to reflect any future events or circumstances or otherwise. For a discussion of potential risks and uncertainties, please refer to the risk factors listed in our SEC filings. Copies of our SEC filings are available on our Investor Relations website, www.nxp.com/investor or from the SEC website, www.sec.gov.

        For further information, please contact:

        Investors: Media:
        Jeff Palmer Paige Iven
        jeff.palmer@nxp.com  paige.iven@nxp.com
        +1 408 205 0687  +1 817 975 0602
           

        NXP-CORP

        NXP Semiconductors
        Table 1: Condensed consolidated statement of operations (unaudited)

        ($ in millions except share data) Three months ended
          June 29, 2025   March 30, 2025   June 30, 2024
                   
        Revenue $ 2,926     $ 2,835     $ 3,127  
        Cost of revenue   (1,364 )     (1,275 )     (1,335 )
        Gross profit   1,562       1,560       1,792  
        Research and development   (573 )     (547 )     (594 )
        Selling, general and administrative   (278 )     (281 )     (270 )
        Amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets   (25 )     (27 )     (28 )
        Total operating expenses   (876 )     (855 )     (892 )
        Other income (expense)   1       18       (4 )
        Operating income (loss)   687       723       896  
        Financial income (expense):          
        Other financial income (expense)   (86 )     (92 )     (75 )
        Income (loss) before income taxes   601       631       821  
        Benefit (provision) for income taxes   (116 )     (130 )     (154 )
        Results relating to equity-accounted investees   (28 )     (4 )     (3 )
        Net income (loss)   457       497       664  
        Less: Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests   12       7       6  
        Net income (loss) attributable to stockholders   445       490       658  
                   
        Earnings per share data:          
        Net income (loss) per common share attributable to stockholders in $
        Basic $ 1.76     $ 1.93     $ 2.58  
        Diluted $ 1.75     $ 1.92     $ 2.54  
                   
        Weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period (in thousands):
        Basic   252,418       253,709       255,478  
        Diluted   253,844       255,018       258,732  
                   

        NXP Semiconductors
        Table 2: Condensed consolidated balance sheet (unaudited)

        ($ in millions) As of
          June 29, 2025   March 30, 2025   June 30, 2024
        ASSETS          
        Current assets:          
        Cash and cash equivalents $ 3,170     $ 3,988     $ 2,859  
        Short-term deposits               400  
        Accounts receivable, net   1,071       1,060       927  
        Assets held for sale   294              
        Inventories, net   2,361       2,350       2,148  
        Other current assets   790       627       546  
        Total current assets   7,686       8,025       6,880  
                   
        Non-current assets:          
        Deferred tax assets   1,306       1,284       1,067  
        Other non-current assets   1,909       1,942       1,223  
        Property, plant and equipment, net   3,130       3,210       3,289  
        Identified intangible assets, net   1,121       777       796  
        Goodwill   10,098       9,942       9,941  
        Total non-current assets   17,564       17,155       16,316  
                   
        Total assets   25,250       25,180       23,196  
                   
        LIABILITIES AND EQUITY          
        Current liabilities:          
        Accounts payable   892       863       929  
        Restructuring liabilities-current   65       75       62  
        Other current liabilities   1,471       1,412       1,622  
        Short-term debt   1,999       1,499       499  
        Total current liabilities   4,427       3,849       3,112  
                   
        Non-current liabilities:          
        Long-term debt   9,479       10,226       9,681  
        Restructuring liabilities   60       4       7  
        Other non-current liabilities   1,348       1,424       1,051  
        Total non-current liabilities   10,887       11,654       10,739  
                   
        Non-controlling interests   367       355       327  
        Stockholders’ equity   9,569       9,322       9,018  
        Total equity   9,936       9,677       9,345  
                   
        Total liabilities and equity   25,250       25,180       23,196  
                   

        NXP Semiconductors
        Table 3: Condensed consolidated statement of cash flows (unaudited)

        ($ in millions) Three months ended
          June 29, 2025   March 30, 2025   June 30, 2024
        Cash flows from operating activities:          
        Net income (loss) $ 457     $ 497     $ 664  
        Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used for) operating activities:          
        Depreciation and amortization   207       209       213  
        Share-based compensation   117       127       114  
        Amortization of discount (premium) on debt, net         1       1  
        Amortization of debt issuance costs   2       1       1  
        Net (gain) loss on sale of assets   (6 )     (22 )      
        Results relating to equity-accounted investees   28       4       3  
        (Gain) loss on equity securities, net   (3 )     6       3  
        Deferred tax expense (benefit)   3       (27 )     (23 )
        Changes in operating assets and liabilities:          
        (Increase) decrease in receivables and other current assets   (106 )     (29 )     10  
        (Increase) decrease in inventories   (90 )     6       (46 )
        Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and other liabilities   33       (110 )     (220 )
        (Increase) decrease in other non-current assets   131       (106 )     40  
        Exchange differences   9       4       5  
        Other items   (3 )     4       (4 )
        Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities   779       565       761  
                   
        Cash flows from investing activities:          
        Purchase of identified intangible assets   (37 )     (25 )     (55 )
        Capital expenditures on property, plant and equipment   (83 )     (139 )     (185 )
        Proceeds from the disposals of property, plant and equipment         1       1  
        Purchase of interests in businesses, net of cash acquired   (679 )            
        Purchase of investments   (93 )     (53 )      
        Net cash provided by (used for) investing activities   (892 )     (216 )     (239 )
                   
        Cash flows from financing activities:          
        Repurchase of long-term debt   (500 )            
        Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt         370        
        Proceeds from the issuance of commercial paper notes   1,565       646        
        Repayment of commercial paper notes   (1,315 )     (146 )      
        Dividends paid to common stockholders   (257 )     (258 )     (260 )
        Proceeds from issuance of common stock through stock plans   2       37       3  
        Purchase of treasury shares and restricted stock unit withholdings   (204 )     (303 )     (310 )
        Other, net         (1 )      
        Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities   (709 )     345       (567 )
                   
        Effect of changes in exchange rates on cash positions   4       2       (4 )
        Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents   (818 )     696       (49 )
        Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period   3,988       3,292       2,908  
        Cash and cash equivalents at end of period   3,170       3,988       2,859  
                   
        Net cash paid during the period for:          
        Interest   109       41       86  
        Income taxes, net of refunds   167       96       193  
        Net gain (loss) on sale of assets:          
        Cash proceeds from the sale of assets   6       31       1  
        Book value of these assets         (9 )     (1 )
        Non-cash investing activities:          
        Non-cash capital expenditures   103       108       166  
                   

        NXP Semiconductors
        Table 4: Financial Reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP Results (unaudited)

        ($ in millions except share data) Three months ended
          June 29, 2025   March 30, 2025   June 30, 2024
        GAAP Gross Profit $ 1,562     $ 1,560     $ 1,792  
        PPA Effects   (7 )     (8 )     (12 )
        Restructuring   (61 )     (4 )     (4 )
        Share-based compensation   (14 )     (16 )     (15 )
        Other incidentals   (8 )     (3 )     (10 )
        Non-GAAP Gross Profit $ 1,652     $ 1,591     $ 1,833  
        GAAP Gross margin   53.4 %     55.0 %     57.3 %
        Non-GAAP Gross margin   56.5 %     56.1 %     58.6 %
        GAAP Research and development $ (573 )   $ (547 )   $ (594 )
        Restructuring   (3 )     (7 )     (4 )
        Share-based compensation   (58 )     (64 )     (58 )
        Other incidentals   (7 )     (1 )      
        Non-GAAP Research and development $ (505 )   $ (475 )   $ (532 )
        GAAP Selling, general and administrative $ (278 )   $ (281 )   $ (270 )
        PPA effects               (1 )
        Restructuring   (3 )     (3 )     2  
        Share-based compensation   (45 )     (47 )     (41 )
        Other incidentals   (15 )     (20 )     (2 )
        Non-GAAP Selling, general and administrative $ (215 )   $ (211 )   $ (228 )
        GAAP Operating income (loss) $ 687     $ 723     $ 896  
        PPA effects   (32 )     (40 )     (41 )
        Restructuring   (67 )     (14 )     (6 )
        Share-based compensation   (117 )     (127 )     (114 )
        Other incidentals   (32 )           (14 )
        Non-GAAP Operating income (loss) $ 935     $ 904     $ 1,071  
        GAAP Operating margin   23.5 %     25.5 %     28.7 %
        Non-GAAP Operating margin   32.0 %     31.9 %     34.3 %
        GAAP Income tax benefit (provision) $ (116 )   $ (130 )   $ (154 )
        Income tax effect   32       13       15  
        Non-GAAP Income tax benefit (provision) $ (148 )   $ (143 )   $ (169 )
        GAAP Net income (loss) attributable to stockholders $ 445     $ 490     $ 658  
        PPA Effects   (32 )     (40 )     (41 )
        Restructuring   (67 )     (14 )     (6 )
        Share-based compensation   (117 )     (127 )     (114 )
        Other incidentals   (32 )           (14 )
        Other adjustments:          
        Adjustments to financial income (expense)   (1 )     (12 )     (8 )
        Income tax effect   32       13       15  
        Results relating to equity-accounted investees, excluding Foundry investees1   (28 )     (3 )     (3 )
        Non-GAAP Net income (loss) attributable to stockholders $ 690     $ 673     $ 829  
                   
                   
        Additional Information:          
        1. Refer to Table 7 below for further information regarding the results relating to equity-accounted investees.
                   
        GAAP net income (loss) per common share attributable to stockholders – diluted $ 1.75     $ 1.92     $ 2.54  
        PPA Effects   (0.12 )     (0.16 )     (0.16 )
        Restructuring   (0.27 )     (0.05 )     (0.02 )
        Share-based compensation   (0.46 )     (0.50 )     (0.44 )
        Other incidentals   (0.13 )           (0.06 )
        Other adjustments:          
        Adjustments to financial income (expense)         (0.05 )     (0.03 )
        Income tax effect   0.12       0.05       0.06  
        Results relating to equity-accounted investees, excluding Foundry investees1   (0.11 )     (0.01 )     (0.01 )
        Non-GAAP net income (loss) per common share attributable to stockholders – diluted $ 2.72     $ 2.64     $ 3.20  
                   
                   
        Additional Information:          
        1. Refer to Table 7 below for further information regarding the results relating to equity-accounted investees.

        NXP Semiconductors
        Table 5: Financial Reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP Financial income (expense) (unaudited)

        ($ in millions) Three months ended
          June 29, 2025   March 30, 2025   June 30, 2024
        GAAP Financial income (expense) $ (86 )   $ (92 )   $ (75 )
        Foreign exchange loss   (7 )     (3 )     (2 )
        Other financial expense   6       (9 )     (6 )
        Non-GAAP Financial income (expense) $ (85 )   $ (80 )   $ (67 )
                   
         

        NXP Semiconductors
        Table 6: Financial Reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP Other income (expense) (unaudited)

        ($ in millions) Three months ended
          June 29, 2025   March 30, 2025   June 30, 2024
        GAAP Other income (expense) $ 1     $ 18     $ (4 )
        PPA effects         (5 )      
        Other incidentals   (2 )     24       (2 )
        Non-GAAP Other income (expense) $ 3     $ (1 )   $ (2 )
                   

        NXP Semiconductors
        Table 7: Financial Reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP Results relating to equity-accounted investees (unaudited)

        ($ in millions) Three months ended
          June 29, 2025   March 30, 2025   June 30, 2024
        GAAP Results relating to equity-accounted investees $ (28 )   $ (4 )   $ (3 )
        Results of equity-accounted investees, excluding Foundry investees1   (28 )     (3 )     (3 )
        Non-GAAP Results relating to equity-accounted investees $     $ (1 )   $  
                   
        Additional Information:
        1. We adjust our results relating to equity-accounted investees for those results from investments over which NXP has significant influence, but not control, and whose business activities are not related to the core operating performance of NXP. Our equity-investments in foundry partners are part of our long-term core operating performance and accordingly those results comprise the Non-GAAP Results relating to equity-accounted investees.

        NXP Semiconductors
        Table 8: Adjusted EBITDA and Free Cash Flow (unaudited)

        ($ in millions) Three months ended
          June 29, 2025   March 30, 2025   June 30, 2024
        GAAP Net income (loss) $ 457     $ 497     $ 664  
        Reconciling items to EBITDA (Non-GAAP)          
        Financial (income) expense   86       92       75  
        (Benefit) provision for income taxes   116       130       154  
        Depreciation and impairment   143       143       146  
        Amortization   64       66       67  
        EBITDA (Non-GAAP) $ 866     $ 928     $ 1,106  
        Reconciling items to adjusted EBITDA (Non-GAAP)          
        Results of equity-accounted investees, excluding Foundry investees1   28       3       3  
        Purchase accounting effect on asset sale         5        
        Restructuring   67       14       6  
        Share-based compensation   117       127       114  
        Other incidental items2   25       (4 )     14  
        Adjusted EBITDA (Non-GAAP) $ 1,103     $ 1,073     $ 1,243  
        Trailing twelve month adjusted EBITDA (Non-GAAP) $ 4,745     $ 4,885     $ 5,297  
                   
        Additional Information:          
        1. Refer to Table 7 above for further information regarding the results relating to equity-accounted investees.
        2. Excluding from total other incidental items, charges included in depreciation, amortization or impairment reconciling items:
        • other incidental items
          7       4        
                   
                   
                   
        ($ in millions) Three months ended
          June 29, 2025   March 30, 2025   June 30, 2024
        Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities $ 779     $ 565     $ 761  
        Net capital expenditures on property, plant and equipment   (83 )     (138 )     (184 )
        Non-GAAP free cash flow $ 696     $ 427     $ 577  
        Trailing twelve month non-GAAP free cash flow $ 2,008     $ 1,889     $ 2,954  
        Trailing twelve month non-GAAP free cash flow as percent of Revenue   17 %     15 %     23 %
                   

      The MIL Network

  • MIL-Evening Report: PBS and NPR are generally unbiased, independent of government propaganda and provide key benefits to US democracy

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Stephanie A. (Sam) Martin, Frank and Bethine Church Endowed Chair of Public Affairs, Boise State University

    Congress’ cuts to public broadcasting will diminish the range and volume of the free press and the independent reporting it provides. MicroStockHub-iStock/Getty Images Plus

    Champions of the almost entirely party-line vote in the U.S. Senate to erase US$1.1 billion in already approved funds for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting called their action a refusal to subsidize liberal media.

    “Public broadcasting has long been overtaken by partisan activists,” said U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas, insisting there is no need for government to fund what he regards as biased media. “If you want to watch the left-wing propaganda, turn on MSNBC,” Cruz said.

    Accusing the media of liberal bias has been a consistent conservative complaint since the civil rights era, when white Southerners insisted news outlets were slanting their stories against segregation. During his presidential campaign in 1964, U.S. Sen. Barry Goldwater of Arizona complained that the media was against him, an accusation that has been repeated by every Republican presidential candidate since.

    But those charges of bias rarely survive empirical scrutiny.

    As chair of a public policy institute devoted to strengthening deliberative democracy, I have written two books about the media and the presidency, and another about media ethics. My research traces how news institutions shape civic life and why healthy democracies rely on journalism that is independent of both market pressure and partisan talking points.

    That independence in the United States – enshrined in the press freedom clause of the First Amendment – gives journalists the ability to hold government accountable, expose abuses of power and thereby support democracy.

    GOP Sen. Ted Cruz speaks to reporters as Senate Republicans vote on President Donald Trump’s request to cancel about $9 billion in foreign aid and public broadcasting spending on July 16, 2025.
    AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

    Trusting independence

    Ad Fontes Media, a self-described “public benefit company” whose mission is to rate media for credibility and bias, have placed the reporting of “PBS NewsHour” under 10 points left of the ideological center. They label it as both “reliable” and based in “analysis/fact.” “Fox and Friends,” by contrast, the popular morning show on Fox News, is nearly 20 points to the right. The scale starts at zero and runs 42 points to the left to measure progressive bias and 42 points to the right to measure conservative bias. Ratings are provided by three-person panels comprising left-, right- and center-leaning reviewers.

    A 2020 peer-reviewed study in Science Advances that tracked more than 6,000 political reporters likewise found “no evidence of liberal media bias” in the stories they chose to cover, even though most journalists are more left-leaning than the rest of the population.

    A similar 2016 study published in Public Opinion Quarterly said that media are more similar than dissimilar and, excepting political scandals, “major
    news organizations present topics in a largely nonpartisan manner,
    casting neither Democrats nor Republicans in a particularly favorable
    or unfavorable light
    .”

    Surveys show public media’s audiences do not see it as biased. A national poll of likely voters released July 14, 2025, found that 53% of respondents trust public media to report news “fully, accurately and fairly,” while only 35% extend that trust to “the media in general.” A majority also opposed eliminating federal support.

    Contrast these numbers with attitudes about public broadcasters such as MTVA in Hungary or the TVP in Poland, where the state controls most content. Protests in Budapest October 2024 drew thousands demanding an end to “propaganda.” Oxford’s Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism reports that TVP is the least trusted news outlet in the country.

    While critics sometimes conflate American public broadcasting with state-run outlets, the structures are very different.

    Safeguards for editorial freedom

    In state-run media systems, a government agency hires editors, dictates coverage and provides full funding from the treasury. Public officials determine – or make up – what is newsworthy. Individual media operations survive only so long as the party in power is happy.

    Public broadcasting in the U.S. works in almost exactly the opposite way: The Corporation for Public Broadcasting is a private nonprofit with a statutory “firewall” that forbids political interference.

    More than 70% of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting’s federal appropriation for 2025 of US$1.1 billion flows through to roughly 1,500 independently governed local stations, most of which are NPR or PBS affiliates but some of which are unaffiliated community broadcasters. CPB headquarters retains only about 5% of that federal funding.

    Stations survive by combining this modest federal grant money with listener donations, underwriting and foundation support. That creates a diversified revenue mix that further safeguards their editorial freedom.

    And while stations share content, each also has latitude when it comes to programming and news coverage, especially at the local level.

    As a public-private partnership, individual communities mostly own the public broadcasting system and its affiliate stations. Congress allocates funds, while community nonprofits, university boards, state authorities or other local license holders actually own and run the stations. Individual monthly donors are often called “members” and sometimes have voting rights in station-governance matters. Membership contributions make up the largest share of revenue for most stations, providing another safeguard for editorial independence.

    A host and guest in July 2024 sit inside a recording studio at KMXT, the public radio station on Kodiak Island in Alaska.
    Nathaniel Herz/Northern Journal

    Broadly shared civic commons

    And then there are public media’s critical benefits to democracy itself.

    A 2021 report from the European Broadcasting Union links public broadcasting with higher voter turnout, better factual knowledge and lower susceptibility to extremist rhetoric.

    Experts warn that even small cuts will exacerbate an already pernicious problem with political disinformation in the U.S., as citizens lose access to free information that fosters media literacy and encourages trust across demographics.

    In many ways, public media remains the last broadly shared civic commons. It is both commercial-free and independently edited.

    Another study, by the University of Pennsylvania’s Annenberg School in 2022, affirmed that “countries with independent and well-funded public broadcasting systems also consistently have stronger democracies.”

    The study highlighted how public media works to bridge divides and foster understanding across polarized groups. Unlike commercial media, where the profit motive often creates incentives to emphasize conflict and sensationalism, public media generally seeks to provide balanced perspectives that encourage dialogue and mutual respect. Reports are often longer and more in-depth than those by other news outlets.

    Such attention to nuance provides a critical counterweight to the fragmented, often hyperpartisan news bubbles that pervade cable news and social media. And this skillful, more balanced treatment helps to ameliorate political polarization and misinformation.

    In all, public media’s unique structure and mission make democracy healthier in the U.S. and across the world. Public media prioritizes education and civic enlightenment. It gives citizens important tools for navigating complex issues to make informed decisions – whether those decisions are about whom to vote for or about public policy itself. Maintaining and strengthening public broadcasting preserves media diversity and advances important principles of self-government.

    Congress’ cuts to public broadcasting will diminish the range and volume of the free press and the independent reporting it provides. Ronald Reagan once described a free press as vital for the United States to succeed in its “noble experiment in self-government.” From that perspective, more independent reporting – not less – will prove the best remedy for any worry about partisan spin.

    Stephanie A. (Sam) Martin does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. PBS and NPR are generally unbiased, independent of government propaganda and provide key benefits to US democracy – https://theconversation.com/pbs-and-npr-are-generally-unbiased-independent-of-government-propaganda-and-provide-key-benefits-to-us-democracy-261512

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-Evening Report: The end of open-plan classrooms: how school design reflects changing ideas in education

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Leon Benade, Professor in the School of Education of Edith Cowan University (ECU), Perth, WA, Edith Cowan University

    skynesher/Getty Imaged

    The end of open-plan classrooms in New Zealand, recently announced by Education Minister Erica Stanford, marks yet another swing of the pendulum in school design.

    Depending on who you ask, these classrooms were an opportunity to foster collaboration and flexibility or an exercise in organised chaos.

    So-called “modern learning environments” – characterised by flexible layouts, fewer walls and sometimes multiple classes and teachers in one space – were vigorously pushed by the National government in 2011.

    The stated goal was to promote flexibility in the way students were taught, encourage collaboration and to accommodate new technology in classrooms.

    But a 2024 ministerial inquiry into school property found complex procurement, design and authorisation processes associated with bespoke designs caused delays, budget overruns and unrealised expectations in many school communities.

    Among the solutions offered by the inquiry was the development of simple but functional schools based on cookie-cutter designs constructed off-site. This recommendation was welcomed by the current National-led government.

    Design influenced by ideology

    The modern, bespoke designs of the past two decades represented a response to technological developments, such as the introduction of digital devices, that changed how students learned.

    This resulted in the steady replacement of traditional school designs from the industrial age with spaces designed for flexibility.

    Those industrial age schools were themselves products of changes in the second half of the 20th century. Since the first school opened in 1843, school architecture in New Zealand had evolved significantly. Early schools featured cramped six-metre by four-metre classrooms which could accommodate more than 30 students.

    By the 1920s, the “Taranaki” and “Canterbury” models included a more generous minimum classroom size of eight metres by seven metres. There was a greater emphasis on light and ventilation. Their larger spaces also recognised changes in teaching styles that encouraged more active and participatory learning.

    By the 1950s, classroom size had grown to ten metres by seven metres. The “Nelson” and “S68” blocks of the 1950s and 1960s provided small self-contained blocks of classrooms that reduced student movement and corridor noise.

    Changes to New Zealand school buildings also reflected global trends. Open-plan schools emerged in North America after 1960. At the same time, there were signs English schools would replace their traditional Victorian-style buildings with classrooms considered more child-centred.

    The goal was to achieve flexible, connected designs to support evolving education philosophies. England’s 1966 Plowden Report on primary education significantly aided this evolution towards progressive styles of teaching and learning, leading to the creation of schools that featured flexibility, connectivity and external-internal flow.

    These schools were the forerunners of “innovative learning environments” and were considered cutting-edge at the time.

    In 2004, the ambitious Building Schools for the Future programme was launched in the United Kingdom. It was designed to replace outdated school facilities considered unfit for preparing students for the 21st century.

    But in 2011, the James Review of Education Capital highlighted a number of issues with the way schools were being built, putting an end to the infrastructure programme.

    That report, like the 2024 New Zealand report, suggested replacing government investment in bespoke school infrastructure with a focus on standardised designs.

    A swing back

    In New Zealand, “modern learning environments” became part of education policy with the Ministry of Education’s School Property Strategy 2011-2021, published in 2011. But the pendulum started to swing back after Labour came to power in 2017.

    Departing from the 2011 strategy, the language of “modern learning environments”, “innovative learning environments” and “flexible learning spaces” largely disappeared. It was replaced in policy documents with “quality learning environments”.

    This shift emphasised physical characteristics such as heating, lighting and acoustics, rather than innovative approaches to teaching and learning.

    Since coming to power, the current National-led coalition has focused on embedding a standardised approach to foundational skills in reading, writing, maths and science.

    While not directly scapegoating open-plan designs for educational underachievement, Erica Stanford said the reforms would ensure learning spaces were “designed to improve student outcomes”.

    But as New Zealand moves back to standardised designs, it is worth considering why modern learning environments were introduced in the first place – the flexibility for new technology and space for collaboration – and what students may lose by a swing back towards the separate classrooms of the past.

    Leon Benade is affiliated with Learning Environments Australasia, Philosophy of Education Society of Australasia (PESA) and The Australian Association for Research in Education (AARE).

    Chris Bradbeer is affiliated with Learning Environments New Zealand/Aotearoa (LENZ), and Learning Environments Australasia (LEA).

    Alastair Wells does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. The end of open-plan classrooms: how school design reflects changing ideas in education – https://theconversation.com/the-end-of-open-plan-classrooms-how-school-design-reflects-changing-ideas-in-education-261359

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI Africa: Minister of State and Ministry of Foreign Affairs: Responsibility for Implementing DRC Peace Agreement Lies with Both Parties

    Source: Government of Qatar

    Doha, July 19, 2025

    HE Minister of State at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Dr. Mohammed bin Abdulaziz bin Saleh Al Khulaifi, affirmed that the responsibility for implementing the agreement between the Government of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and the Congo River Alliance/March 23 Movement lies with both parties. His Excellency emphasized that this achievement represents a firm foundation upon which to build a more secure and stable future for the region.

    Speaking at a press conference following the signing of the Declaration of Principles between the Government of the DRC and the Congo River Alliance/March 23 Movement in Doha today, His Excellency described the declaration as a critical step toward strengthening peace and stability in eastern DRC. It marks the beginning of direct negotiations aimed at achieving a comprehensive peace that addresses the root causes of the conflict. He expressed confidence in the commitment of both parties to uphold the agreement.

    HE Dr. Al Khulaifi underscored the State of Qatar’s role as a neutral and effective mediator, highlighting its efforts to bring the parties closer together and build bridges of understanding. He praised the sense of responsibility demonstrated by both sides in reaching this declaration and expressed appreciation for the trust placed in Qatar to facilitate the process.

    His Excellency commended the substantial support of HE President of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Felix Tshisekedi, for the peace process, as well as the constructive approach of the Congolese government’s negotiating delegation. He also acknowledged the cooperation of Bernard Bisimwa, Vice President of the Congo River Alliance/M23 Movement, and the movement’s delegation during the talks.

    HE Dr. Al Khulaifi noted that Qatari mediation efforts began in March, when HH the Amir Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al-Thani hosted HE President Tshisekedi and HE President of the Republic of Rwanda, Paul Kagame, in Doha. During that meeting, President Tshisekedi expressed his readiness to engage in dialogue with the Congo River Alliance/March 23 Movement.

    Since then, Qatar has hosted direct negotiations between the parties, which were marked by a positive and responsible spirit, grounded in a shared belief in dialogue as the primary path to conflict resolution. These efforts culminated in the signing of the Declaration of Principles.

    Dr. Al Khulaifi stated that the leaders’ meeting in March served as a launching point for this process, leading to a series of positive developments, including the signing of the Washington Agreement between the DRC and Rwanda on June 27, 2025, an agreement that paved the way for today’s declaration.

    He emphasized that the Declaration of Principles is not solely focused on ending violence but also provides a practical roadmap for national reconciliation. It marks the beginning of a new phase of cooperation among various societal components in the DRC, including armed groups that have chosen the path of peace. The declaration also outlines a significant role for the international community in supporting peacebuilding and sustainable development.

    His Excellency noted that the two parties demonstrated a genuine determination to break the cycle of violence and build mutual trust through concrete actions, such as the exchange of prisoners and detainees, the restoration of state authority, and the dignified return of displaced persons and refugees.

    HE Dr. Al Khulaifi expressed the State of Qatar’s gratitude to the African Union and acknowledged the support of the United States of America, particularly the efforts of HE US Presidential Envoy and Senior Advisor for African Affairs, Massad Boulos. He also commended the contributions of HE Chairperson of the African Union Commission, Mahmoud Ali Youssouf.

    Additionally, His Excellency recognized the constructive roles played by the Republic of Rwanda, the French Republic, the United Kingdom, and the Consultative Dialogue Group, as well as the engagement of all regional and international partners backing the process.

    HE Dr. Al Khulaifi affirmed that this initiative reflects Qatar’s steadfast commitment to mediation as a cornerstone of its foreign policy. The State of Qatar remains dedicated to supporting peacemaking efforts, advancing sustainable development, and empowering communities to achieve long-term stability grounded in justice, inclusiveness, and mutual respect.

    He expressed hope that the Declaration of Principles will represent a meaningful step toward lasting peace and sustainable development in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and the wider region.

    For his part, HE Massad Boulos, the US Presidential Envoy and Senior Advisor for African Affairs, praised Qatar’s vital role in facilitating the agreement, stating: “The State of Qatar is known for its pioneering role in resolving conflicts around the world, and we thank it for its essential efforts in this matter.”

    HE Boulos noted that the conflict in the DRC has displaced more than eight million people, and that past initiatives have largely failed to yield results, making the Doha agreement a rare and valuable opportunity to achieve peace.

    He further highlighted Qatar’s diplomatic leadership over the past two decades in facilitating complex peace processes, from Darfur in Sudan, to the Lebanese crisis, the Afghanistan negotiations, and now the DRC.

    HE Boulos emphasized that while the Declaration of Principles marks only the first step, it is a critical one. It addresses core issues such as the immediate and permanent cessation of violence, prisoner exchanges, the restoration of full state authority, and the safe, dignified return of displaced persons and refugees. He called for the launch of direct negotiations to address the roots of the conflict and reach a comprehensive peace agreement, while urging international support for national reconciliation and development in conflict-affected areas.

    MIL OSI Africa

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Pharmac continues to engage with consumers

    Source: New Zealand Government

    Associate Education Minister David Seymour welcomes the establishment of Pharmac’s new consumer working group to help Pharmac help reset how it works with health consumers.

    “For many New Zealanders, funding for pharmaceuticals is life or death, or the difference between a life of pain and suffering or living freely,” Mr Seymour says.  

    “My expectation is that Pharmac should have good processes to ensure that people with an illness, their carers and family, can provide input to decision-making processes. This is part of the ACT-National Coalition Agreement. 

    “Pharmac hosted a Consumer Engagement Workshop in March. Patients and advocates voiced their hopes at resetting the patient – Pharmac relationship. Pharmac published a report on the findings from the workshop. 

    “The report recommended that the Board invite workshop participants, in association with the wider consumer-patient representative community, to select a working group. The group would work with Pharmac’s Board and management to reset the relationship between Pharmac and the consumer/representative community. 

    “The patient advocacy community selected Dr Malcolm Mulholland to lead the consumer working group. He has worked with consumers to select the other members of the working group. These members represent patients with a wide range of health conditions. They are named at the end of this release.”

    “We’ve waited a long time for this opportunity. The work that Pharmac does is vitally important for the health of patients and their families, and this is why getting Pharmac to work as well as it can, will be the focus of the working group,” Dr Mulholland says.

    “The consumer working group met for the first time yesterday to confirm the approach for the reset programme and agree the first set of actions. I look forward to hearing about their progress,” Mr Seymour says. 

    “I’m pleased to see the Board take the opportunity to continue to prioritise expanding opportunities and access for patients and their families by expanding access to more medicines for more groups. 

    “The working group reflects our commitment to a more adaptable and patient-centred approach. It follows my letters of expectations, the consumer engagement workshop, last year’s Medicines Summit, and the acceptance of Patient Voice Aotearoa’s White Paper as actions to achieve this. 

    “The Government is doing its part. Last year we allocated Pharmac its largest ever budget of $6.294 billion over four years, and a $604 million uplift to give Pharmac the financial support it needs to carry out its functions – negotiating the best deals for medicine for New Zealanders.” 

    The consumer working group members are:

    1. Dr Malcolm Mulholland MNZM – Patient Voice Aotearoa
    2. Libby Burgess MNZM – Breast Cancer Aotearoa Coalition
    3. Tim Edmonds – Leukaemia and Blood Cancer NZ
    4. Chris Higgins – Rare Disorders NZ
    5. Francesca Holloway – Arthritis NZ
    6. Trent Lash – Heartbeats Charitable Trust
    7. Gerard Rushton – The Meningitis Foundation
    8. Rachel Smalley MNZM – The Medicine Gap
    9. Tracy Tierney – Epilepsy NZ
    10. Deon York – Haemophilia NZ

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI Security: Defense News in Brief: 510th Buzzards, a history of excellence

    Source: United States Airforce

    Nine pilots from the 510th Expeditionary Fighter Squadron at Aviano Air Base earned Single-Event Air Medals, and two were simultaneously awarded the Distinguished Flying cross, after returning from a deployment to the Central Command area of responsibility. During the deployment, they flew various defensive counter air sorties to protect U.S. Naval assets traveling through the Bab el Mandeb Strait, breaking records along the way.

    “As the new Buzzard Commander, I am honored and humbled to lead such an accomplished team,” said Lt. Col. Brent Smith, the newly appointed commander of the 510th EFS. “The legacy of excellence, dedication and professionalism is inspiring and motivating. It’s a privilege to step into this role and work alongside some of the most talented and mission-focused individuals in the Air Force.”

    During the deployment, the Buzzards flew 8,800 hours and 1,400 total sorties.

    “The Buzzards supported a variety of missions, including Inherent Resolve’s fight against ISIS, Operation Prosperity Guardian’s protection of coalition partners and civilian vessels in the Red Sea, Operation Spartan Shield’s defense of US interests in the Arabian Gulf, and many other force protection and deterrence missions,” Smith said.

    The 510th EFS has a long history of excellence, beginning in 1943 as the 625th Bombardment Squadron until being re-designated the 510th Fighter-Bomber Squadron later that same year.

    After being stationed at various locations across the globe and experiencing multiple periods of activation and inactivation, the 510th EFS was permanently reactivated in 1994, establishing its current home at Aviano AB, Italy.

    The 510th EFS has been the highest flown PSAB fighter unit since 2019, highest flown Aviano deployed unit since 2010, and the highest flown rotation fighter unit in the area of responsibility.

    The Buzzards have flown combat missions during World War II, the Vietnam War, Operation Desert Storm, Operation Provide Comfort, Operation Deny Flight and many more. During their most recent deployment to support Operation Prosperity Guardian, the squadron exuded excellence while protecting American assets overseas.

    “Each decoration represents not only a specific event, but also the precision, teamwork and unwavering commitment to the mission required to successfully execute in combat,” Smith said. “They represent countless hours of preparation, sacrifice and high intensity training by the whole Buzzard operations and maintenance team. They are proof of a culture that demands and delivers high performance every single day.”

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: Defense News in Brief: RIAT 2025 highlights global readiness, cooperation

    Source: United States Airforce

    During the Royal International Air Tattoo, the U.S. Air Force, alongside NATO allies and partners from around the globe, showcased what the strength of multinational relationships can achieve.

    The weather was calm and the sky was blue, yet thunder forced itself to be heard. From July 18-20, thousands of onlookers in the crowd gleefully braced themselves for a procession of roaring aerial acrobatics, helicopter rescue demonstrations, and raw airpower flooding the cloudy air above Royal Air Force Fairford.

    The Royal International Air Tattoo is not only the largest air show in the world – it is a convention of lethality, ingenuity, and partnership. The U.S. Air Force, alongside NATO allies and partners from around the globe, showcased what the strength of multinational relationships can achieve.

    “America’s international partners are one of its greatest strengths,” said U.S. Air Force Capt. Mercer Martin, 99th Expeditionary Reconnaissance Squadron U-2S pilot. “Spending our time meeting our partners in person while forging bonds and friendships is an extremely important addition to the relationships we have with our allied nations around the world.”

    U.S. Air Force Gen. David Allvin, USAF Chief of Staff, speaks with Airmen assigned to the 95th Reconnaissance Squadron during the Royal International Air Tattoo at RAF Fairford, England, July 19, 2025. The interaction and exchanges we have with allies and partners at events like RIAT allows us to learn from and leverage the strengths and capabilities our allies and partners bring to the table. (U.S. Air Force photo by Airman 1st Class Cody J. A. Mott)
    U.S. Air Force Capt. “Yeti” Martin, 99th Expeditionary Reconnaissance Squadron U-2S pilot, explains the capabilities of the U-2S Dragon Lady to Royal Air Force cadets during the Royal International Air Tattoo at RAF Fairford, England, July 18, 2025. One of the many benefits of RIAT is exposing allies, partner nations and the general public to our aircraft and the aircrews who operate them. These aircraft demonstrate our vast capabilities and ability to rapidly respond to threats and assure allies and partners. (U.S. Air Force photo by Airman 1st Class Cody J. A. Mott)
    RAF Red Arrow aerobatic team member Graeme Muscat, announces the pilot’s aerial demonstrations during the Royal International Air Tattoo at RAF Fairford, England, July 20, 2025. Through high-impact aerial displays and multinational participation, RIAT highlights the strategic reach and operational readiness of allied and partner air forces. (U.S. Air Force photo by Airman 1st Class Cody J. A. Mott)

    Exposing both the U.S. and partner-nation personnel to diverse strategies and training methods strengthens the goal of a cohesive, interoperable force. These relationships play a key part in times of peace as much as they do in the theater of war.

    “I enjoy flying an aircraft that’s so close in league with our American colleagues. It’s a real change of pace,” said an RAF Rivet Joint pilot. “Your training systems and operational focus into different deployable locations make it so U.S. Airmen are more versed on how it all works in different areas of the world. It’s nice to be exposed to that and fly more often with pilots who have different techniques.”

    As in years past, one of RIAT’s greatest strengths this year was the access it provided allies, partner nations and the public to U.S. aircraft, aircrew, and the stories behind them. It was a rare chance for global audiences to witness both the capabilities and the humanity behind modern airpower. This visibility builds confidence, strengthens support, and reinforces the value of continued collaboration.

    “As aircrew stationed in the United Kingdom, I’m flying tanker missions and working with NATO allies while refueling them in the air,” said U.S. Air Force Capt. Tobin Nelson, 100th Air Refueling Wing pilot. “Being on the ground and meeting them face-to-face at RIAT is amazing. Knowing I’ve worked with their people gives me the ability to network, plan new training missions, and forge new bonds through flying.”

    RIAT 2025 served as a powerful reminder that diplomacy and military strength go hand in hand. By bringing together allies and partners in a shared celebration of innovation and skill, the air show fostered trust, mutual understanding, and camaraderie that extended far beyond the runway. The relationships built not only enhance all nations’ operational readiness but also promote a culture of cooperation and respect that is vital in today’s complex environments.

    RIAT’s ability to inspire generations also underscores the profound impact of bringing military aviation into the public eye. For many attendees, witnessing these aircraft in action and hearing firsthand accounts from dedicated personnel sparks a passion for service and a belief in the importance of teamwork.

    “When you come here and see participants and children from every walk of life with a sparkle in their eye, you don’t ever want to stifle those dreams,” said U.S. Air Force Tech. Sgt. John Stortecky, 337th Airlift Squadron flight engineer. “Hopefully one day someone will say, ‘I had that tour through the aircraft and I saw them fly – and it inspired me to become who I am today.’”

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI USA: Cornyn Cosponsors Bill to Label Muslim Brotherhood a Foreign Terrorist Organization

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Texas John Cornyn

    WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator John Cornyn (R-TX) cosponsored the Muslim Brotherhood Terrorist Designation Act, which would direct the U.S. Secretary of State to designate the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist group:

    “Hamas – who is responsible for the mass murder of more than 1,200 civilians in the brutal attack against Israel on October 7 – openly identifies as a branch of the Muslim Brotherhood,” said Sen. Cornyn. “This bill rightfully directs the Secretary of State to designate the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization and imposes strict sanctions against them and their proxies who chant ‘death to America,’ sending a clear message that their anti-western agenda and threats to the American people and our allies will not be tolerated.”

    Background:

    The Muslim Brotherhood is a transnational Islamist organization that supports a wide array of regional affiliates, including groups actively engaged in terrorism. Hamas, already designated a Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) by the United States, openly identifies as a branch of the Muslim Brotherhood. Other branches, such as HASM and Liwa al-Thawra, have been linked to the Muslim Brotherhood by the U.S. Department of State and designated as Specially Designated Global Terrorists. Muslim Brotherhood branches have also been implicated in planning or supporting attacks in Jordan and are outlawed as terrorist groups by Austria, Bahrain, Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates. Several European countries are evaluating similar measures.

    The bill modernizes previous efforts by shifting to a bottom-up approach, requiring the U.S. Secretary of State to record and evaluate individual Muslim Brotherhood branches annually, designate those that meet terrorism criteria, and impose sanctions accordingly. This is modeled after the successful approach taken to designate Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps in 2017.

    The Muslim Brotherhood Terrorist Designation Act would:

    • Designate the Muslim Brotherhood under the Anti-Terrorism Act of 1987;
    • Require the U.S. Secretary of State to report annually on Muslim Brotherhood branches and assess their designation eligibility under FTO or SDGT authorities;
    • Mandate sanctions against the global Muslim Brotherhood and any branch found to meet terrorism criteria; and
    • Impose visa restrictions and immigration ineligibility on identified members.

    The Muslim Brotherhood Terrorist Designation Act, led by Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX), was cosponsored by Sens. Tom Cotton (R-AR), John Boozman (R-AR.), Rick Scott (R-FL), Ashley Moody (R-FL), and Dave McCormick (R-PA).

    The legislation is endorsed by FDD Action, Christians United for Israel Action Fund, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), and the Republican Jewish Coalition.

    Companion legislation was introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives by Rep. Mario Díaz-Balart (FL-26).

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: Readout of the Secretary-General’s meeting with H.E. Mr. Petteri Orpo, Prime Minister of the Republic of Finland

    Source: United Nations secretary general

    The Secretary-General met with H.E. Mr. Petteri Orpo, Prime Minister of the Republic of Finland. The Secretary-General and the Prime Minister discussed the global geopolitical situation, including Ukraine and the Middle East, along with the role of the United Nations.

    The 2030 Agenda and the UN80 initiative were also discussed. The Secretary-General commended Finland’s leadership in advancing multilateralism, and its steadfast contributions to the UN system.
     

    MIL OSI United Nations News

  • MIL-OSI USA: ICMYI: Estes Joins Washington Watch with Tony Perkins

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Ron Estes (R-Kansas)

    U.S. Congressman Ron Estes (R-Kansas) joined Washington Watch with Tony Perkins with guest host Jody Hice to discuss the rescissions package, federal spending and provisions within the One Big, Beautiful Bill that will help Kansans and Americans, and more. Watch the interview on YouTube.

    On the rescissions package:

    “Obviously there’s a lot of work we need to do. One out of five dollars that the government spends is borrowed, so we’ve got a lot of things we need to look at. As you said, the rescissions package here was the first time in decades that a president has requested that discretionary spending be pulled back. That, ‘Hey, we don’t need to spend everything that was appropriated a year or longer ago, and focus on specific areas.’

    “If you look through what’s in that rescissions package, the things that we were particularly pulling out, things like funding for NPR. They wanted to fund drag queen programs for children and programs talking about animals need to have their own pronouns … PBS had programs talking about white privilege. 

    “We all heard earlier this year all of the horror stories coming out of USAID in terms of the money that was being wasted around the world. Things like $3 million for electric vehicles in Vietnam and $70,000 for a Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion musical in Ireland. I don’t know why Ireland would want to have a DEI musical, but, if they do, the Irish taxpayers ought to pay for it and not American taxpayers. 

    “It’s great to do this rescissions package. [I was] glad to hear Speaker Johnson reiterate today that we need to be doing more of this as we look at all of the discretionary spending that comes out of the federal government, and what do we do going forward. We’ve got a lot of work to do, not just on a discretionary side with rescissions, but obviously some of those automatic spending programs as well.”

    On other areas of the federal government that may be right for rescissions:

    “When we look across the discretionary course, the spending has grown so great since before Covid. If you look at going back to I believe 2019, our tax revenue has gone up. It’s gone up 46% or so, so we’ve got a lot more tax revenue coming in after we passed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act in 2017. 

    “What we’ve seen is spending’s gone up 70%. Some of that was temporary spending, or should have been temporary spending in Covid, but now it’s gotten baked in and it’s continued on grant programs and other areas across multiple programs. We’ve got so many programs at the federal level that are redundant. You may have four or five different programs in two or three different agencies that are designed to target the same issue. So we’ve got lots of areas to look at that. 

    “DOGE did a great effort earlier this year in identifying some of those areas, but we need to have a constant look at that in terms of where do we spend money, where should we be spending money, and does it make sense to spend dollars at this point, particularly when we’re borrowing one out of five dollars that’s being spent.”

    On the tone of Democrats’ messaging to their voter base:

    “[Democrats] really are [tone deaf.] They don’t have a positive message. They don’t have something that they want America to be for. Basically the Democrat party has become a party of socialists. They’re looking at, ‘How can they make the government spend and dictate what other people do?’ 

    “For example, we look at the One Big, Beautiful Bill, I could talk about so many great provisions there. But their message out of the One Big, Beautiful Bill, that they oppose, is because they wanted to make sure that illegal immigrants got Medicaid. They wanted to make sure that people didn’t have to work at all for the Medicaid dollars that would be given to them to provide for their healthcare, [for] even as little as 20 hours a week, working in a job or getting an education or even in a volunteer role. And so, as they get more strident trying to talk against commonsense things, the American public is turning against them. 

    “When you look at the polling data that’s out there right now, of all Americans, [there is] 72% opposition to Democrats and the positions they’re taking in Congress. Even among Democrats, there’s a majority, 52% of Democrats are not happy that Democrats in Congress are not doing what should be done for America.”

    On Congressman Estes’ op-ed on the One Big, Beautiful Bill:

    “We talk a lot about the One Big, Beautiful Bill. There’s just so much positive things in there. A lot of it was centered around the tax provisions that we needed to extend after 2017, that were going to expire this year, and the results of provisions around border security and defense. But if you really peel some of the layers back and look at some of the details, there’s a whole lot of pro-family and pro-life provisions in there. 

    “What we really wanted to do is make sure that, for example, Medicaid funding was used not by Planned Parenthood to provide abortions. I mean we should have Medicaid to actually help people preserve and protect life and not end it. We wanted to make sure that families could raise their children … So we focused on increasing the Child Tax Credit for families and indexing it for inflation. We increased a tax credit for adoption for people to adopt families. That’s so important now when we see the birth rate dropping down to 11.7% per thousand. We need to have a continual growth in population to make sure that America continues to grow. 

    “You look at provisions like employer-funded childcare provisions. We wanted to make sure those were available. Permanent family and medical leave to help people who maybe have a temporary illness or an issue with their family. We wanted to make sure after these disastrous years of Bidenflation that people were able to raise their families and have the income to provide for their family.”

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Security: Operation targeting human trafficking and money laundering: 13 arrests in Romania and Netherlands

    Source: Eurojust

    Starting in 2020, the group, led by two family members, used ‘loverboy’ techniques to target vulnerable Romanian women, who were coerced into prostitution in the Netherlands under direct supervision of the criminal group.

    To maintain total control over the lives of their victims, the suspects lived with them. In some cases, members of the group used physical and psychological force against the women to prevent them from escaping the situation.

    © DIICOT Poliția Românăas

    The sexual exploitation generated significant illegal proceeds for the criminal group, which were laundered through relatives and close friends. These individuals either transported large sums of cash or moved the money through financial institutions.

    Eurojust coordinated the international investigation. After the Romanian authorities approached Eurojust for support in early 2024, several meetings were organised with the Dutch authorities. During these meetings, information about the criminal group was exchanged. To enable the authorities to work together effectively and exchange information and evidence in real time, Eurojust set up a joint investigation team in January 2025.

    Together with Eurojust, the authorities organised an action day early this month to detain the suspects and gather more evidence through house searches. In the Netherlands, six suspects were arrested and four houses were searched. During actions in Romania, four suspects were arrested based on European Arrest Warrants from the Netherlands and three suspects were put under judicial control. Additionally, 18 houses were searched and a car, weapons and cash were seized.

    Eight of the arrested suspects remain in pre-trial detention.

    The following authorities carried out the operation:

    • Romania: Prosecution Office attached to the High Court of Cassation and Justice- Directorate for Investigating Organised Crime and Terrorism –Ploiesti Territorial Service; Police Inspectorate Prahova-Criminal Investigation Service; Brigade for Combating Organised Crime Ploiesti
    • Netherlands: Public Prosecutor’s Office Amsterdam

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: Alleged perpetrator of sending thousands of threatening emails to schools in Czech Republic, Slovakia and Latvia apprehended

    Source: Eurojust

    Eurojust has assisted the authorities in the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Latvia with the apprehension of the alleged perpetrator who was responsible for sending thousands of emails in September last year threatening schools with explosions. The mass threats, which were also sent to other educational institutions and leisure centres, caused major public concern and led to the suspension of classes at the beginning of the school year.

    Eurojust supported the national authorities involved by setting up a joint investigation team (JIT) dedicated to the case, as well as providing additional cross-border judicial support.

    The alleged perpetrator also used the social network Telegram to spread his threats. He was apprehended in the Ukrainian city of Dnipro last week but was released pending potential further steps to be taken by the authorities.

    © Dnipropetrovsk Regional Prosecutor’s Office

    Given the mass scale of the threats at the same time across three countries, the police authorities involved coordinated their investigations, assisted by the setting up of the JIT. The joint investigative efforts, using the cybercrime expertise of the police, led to the identification of an alleged perpetrator, operating from the Ukrainian city of Dnipro.

    With the participation of Czech and Slovak police officers, a joint action took place in Dnipro last week, during which the alleged perpetrator was apprehended and one individual was questioned. Furthermore, two locations were searched, which led to the seizure of computer equipment.

    Thanks to the good and close cooperation of all the authorities concerned, the operation was successfully carried out under extremely difficult circumstances, very close to the frontline of the war in Ukraine, with Ukrainian, Czech and Slovak officers exposed to heavy risks.

    Eurojust offered support not only through the establishment of the JIT but also by organising a coordination meeting to prepare for the joint action day in Ukraine. The operation was carried out at the request of and by the following authorities:

    • Czech Republic: High Public Prosecutor’s Office in Prague; National Counterterrorism, Extremism and Cybercrime Agency (NCTEKK)
    • Latvia: Rīga Pārdaugava Prosecution Office; 1st Unit of Cybercrime Enforcement Department of the Central Criminal Police Department of the State Police
    • Slovakia: General Prosecutor´s Office of the Slovak Republic; Police Department West, Anti-Crime Unit, Bureau for Combating Organized Crime of the Presidium of the Police Corps (Police ACU); Counter Terrorism Centre, Presidium of the Police Corps
    • Ukraine: Dnipropetrovsk regional Prosecutor’s Office; Main Department of National Police in Dnipropetrovsk region; Division for Combating Cybercrime in Dnipropetrovsk region of the Cyber Police Department of National Police of Ukraine

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Economics: Arbitrators issue award in EU-China intellectual property dispute

    Source: WTO

    Headline: Arbitrators issue award in EU-China intellectual property dispute

    This is the second appeal arbitration conducted under the Multi-Party Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement (MPIA) to which both China and the European Union are participants.
    Summary of key findings 

    Download:

    In pdf format:

    What is the MPIA?
    The MPIA was agreed upon among its original 18 participating members in April 2020 to provide the possibility of resorting to arbitration under Article 25 of the DSU in case of an appeal in disputes between any two or more participating members. Currently the following WTO members are parties to the MPIA: Australia; Benin; Brazil; Canada; Chile; China; Colombia; Costa Rica; Ecuador; the European Union; Guatemala; Hong Kong, China; Iceland; Japan; Macao, China; Malaysia; Mexico; Montenegro; New Zealand; Nicaragua; Norway; Pakistan; Paraguay; Peru; the Philippines; Singapore; Switzerland; Ukraine; the United Kingdom; and Uruguay.

    Share

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI Economics: Arbitrators issue award in EU-China intellectual property dispute

    Source: WTO

    Headline: Arbitrators issue award in EU-China intellectual property dispute

    This is the second appeal arbitration conducted under the Multi-Party Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement (MPIA) to which both China and the European Union are participants.
    Summary of key findings 

    Download:

    In pdf format:

    What is the MPIA?
    The MPIA was agreed upon among its original 18 participating members in April 2020 to provide the possibility of resorting to arbitration under Article 25 of the DSU in case of an appeal in disputes between any two or more participating members. Currently the following WTO members are parties to the MPIA: Australia; Benin; Brazil; Canada; Chile; China; Colombia; Costa Rica; Ecuador; the European Union; Guatemala; Hong Kong, China; Iceland; Japan; Macao, China; Malaysia; Mexico; Montenegro; New Zealand; Nicaragua; Norway; Pakistan; Paraguay; Peru; the Philippines; Singapore; Switzerland; Ukraine; the United Kingdom; and Uruguay.

    Share

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI Economics: Members highlight progress in sustainability discussions, discuss MC14 objectives

    Source: WTO

    Headline: Members highlight progress in sustainability discussions, discuss MC14 objectives

    Ambassador Nadia Theodore of Canada, a co-convener of TESSD, welcomed the “important strides” made by the four working groups — each focused on a different key theme outlined above . As work intensifies in the lead-up to MC14, she noted: “It is useful to recall that, as an incubator of ideas, our aim is to identify where trade policy can best support members’ efforts to achieve their environmental and climate goals and promote more sustainable production and consumption.”
    Progress in working groups
    The facilitators of the four TESSD working groups updated members on progress made in recent technical discussions, with several highlighting advances in drafting outcome documents in preparation for MC14. Feedback from members is currently being incorporated into the outcome documents and revised versions will be circulated ahead of the next working group meetings in October.
    Jean-Marie Meraldi of Switzerland, the facilitator of the Working Group on Trade-Related Climate Measures (TrCMs) highlighted the discussions held in May, which focused on the interoperability of carbon border adjustment mechanisms (CBAMs). Key topics included carbon standards, emissions measurement methodologies, and data exchange frameworks. Members also reviewed the first draft outcome document mapping trade-related climate policies. Work is now underway to refine the document’s structure and incorporate members’ feedback.
    Ben Rake of the United Kingdom, co-facilitator of the Working Group on Environmental Goods and Services (EGS) reported that discussions have proceeded on two fronts: sector-specific topics such as sustainable agriculture and climate adaptation, and horizontal issues, including trade facilitation and regulatory practices. The group continued to develop its analytical summary.  A revised version will be reviewed at the October meeting.
    Taka Sashida of Japan and Nur Karabağ  of Türkiye, the co-facilitators of the Working Group on Economy-Circularity reported that members had recently shared a range of experiences  on promoting circularity in the textiles and battery sectors. Members also discussed a draft outcome document for MC14. They broadly supported compiling members’ practices and trade policy tools to capture trade-related aspects of circularity across four key sectors — textiles, batteries, electronics and renewable energy.
    Tiffany Smith, co-facilitator of the Working Group on Subsidies said members have focused on policy incentives and international cooperation to support the decarbonization of energy-intensive industries — such as steel, aluminium and cement — as well as maritime transport. The first draft outcome document on key elements for subsidy design was introduced, including considerations for subsidy design and member experiences.
    Members and stakeholders welcomed the progress achieved across the four TESSD working groups, with many emphasizing their value in fostering inclusive, practical and technical discussions at the intersection of trade and environmental sustainability. Members supported the continued development of the outcome documents, underscoring the importance of transparency, stakeholder engagement, and the sharing of national experiences.
    They highlighted the need to address both horizontal and sector-specific issues and to include examples from developing members. Some suggested that members begin reflecting on the structure of the four working groups and the content of TESSD work beyond MC14. Some members asserted that TESSD has been successful in catalysing the uptake of multilateral discussions on trade-related climate measures and suggested shifting this work to the Committee on Trade and Environment.
    TESSD publication for MC14
    Ambassador Ronald Saborío of Costa Rica, also a co-convener of TESSD, introduced a draft annotated outline for planned TESSD publication for MC14 (INF/TE/SSD/W/40). The draft aims to consolidate key messages and substantive insights into how trade and trade policy can support climate and environmental goals, including the clean energy transition, decarbonization of industry and transport, climate adaptation, and biodiversity. The document also has a section on lessons learned and key messages for policymakers at both national and multilateral levels, along with a forward-looking vision for TESSD’s future work.
    Delegates welcomed the co-convenors’ draft outline for this overarching MC14 output as a good basis for further discussion, recognizing its value in consolidating five years of substantive work and enhancing transparency and understanding for a wide range of policymakers and stakeholders.
    Some members emphasized the importance of maintaining balance across different objectives, while others called for better integration of cross-cutting themes. Several delegates highlighted the importance of including case studies from members at different levels of development  to reflect diverse experiences. Others stressed that the document should remain non-prescriptive.
    In conclusion, Ambassador Saborío thanked participants for their constructive feedback. He reaffirmed TESSD’s commitment to helping members leverage trade to achieve environmental objectives. He said: “Over the past five years, TESSD has made remarkable progress toward its goals. We have created a platform for meaningful dialogue — one that is innovative, creative, active and transparent.” He encouraged continued collaboration in the lead-up to MC14 and assured members that their inputs would be reflected in the revised outcome document.
    More information
    Guided by its 2021 Ministerial Statement, TESSD seeks to complement the work of the WTO Committee on Trade and Environment and advance discussions at the intersection of trade and environmental sustainability towards identifying concrete actions that members could take individually or collectively. The initiative, which is open to all WTO members, is currently co-sponsored by 78 members representing all regions and all levels of development.

    Share

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI Economics: Members highlight progress in sustainability discussions, discuss MC14 objectives

    Source: WTO

    Headline: Members highlight progress in sustainability discussions, discuss MC14 objectives

    Ambassador Nadia Theodore of Canada, a co-convener of TESSD, welcomed the “important strides” made by the four working groups — each focused on a different key theme outlined above . As work intensifies in the lead-up to MC14, she noted: “It is useful to recall that, as an incubator of ideas, our aim is to identify where trade policy can best support members’ efforts to achieve their environmental and climate goals and promote more sustainable production and consumption.”
    Progress in working groups
    The facilitators of the four TESSD working groups updated members on progress made in recent technical discussions, with several highlighting advances in drafting outcome documents in preparation for MC14. Feedback from members is currently being incorporated into the outcome documents and revised versions will be circulated ahead of the next working group meetings in October.
    Jean-Marie Meraldi of Switzerland, the facilitator of the Working Group on Trade-Related Climate Measures (TrCMs) highlighted the discussions held in May, which focused on the interoperability of carbon border adjustment mechanisms (CBAMs). Key topics included carbon standards, emissions measurement methodologies, and data exchange frameworks. Members also reviewed the first draft outcome document mapping trade-related climate policies. Work is now underway to refine the document’s structure and incorporate members’ feedback.
    Ben Rake of the United Kingdom, co-facilitator of the Working Group on Environmental Goods and Services (EGS) reported that discussions have proceeded on two fronts: sector-specific topics such as sustainable agriculture and climate adaptation, and horizontal issues, including trade facilitation and regulatory practices. The group continued to develop its analytical summary.  A revised version will be reviewed at the October meeting.
    Taka Sashida of Japan and Nur Karabağ  of Türkiye, the co-facilitators of the Working Group on Economy-Circularity reported that members had recently shared a range of experiences  on promoting circularity in the textiles and battery sectors. Members also discussed a draft outcome document for MC14. They broadly supported compiling members’ practices and trade policy tools to capture trade-related aspects of circularity across four key sectors — textiles, batteries, electronics and renewable energy.
    Tiffany Smith, co-facilitator of the Working Group on Subsidies said members have focused on policy incentives and international cooperation to support the decarbonization of energy-intensive industries — such as steel, aluminium and cement — as well as maritime transport. The first draft outcome document on key elements for subsidy design was introduced, including considerations for subsidy design and member experiences.
    Members and stakeholders welcomed the progress achieved across the four TESSD working groups, with many emphasizing their value in fostering inclusive, practical and technical discussions at the intersection of trade and environmental sustainability. Members supported the continued development of the outcome documents, underscoring the importance of transparency, stakeholder engagement, and the sharing of national experiences.
    They highlighted the need to address both horizontal and sector-specific issues and to include examples from developing members. Some suggested that members begin reflecting on the structure of the four working groups and the content of TESSD work beyond MC14. Some members asserted that TESSD has been successful in catalysing the uptake of multilateral discussions on trade-related climate measures and suggested shifting this work to the Committee on Trade and Environment.
    TESSD publication for MC14
    Ambassador Ronald Saborío of Costa Rica, also a co-convener of TESSD, introduced a draft annotated outline for planned TESSD publication for MC14 (INF/TE/SSD/W/40). The draft aims to consolidate key messages and substantive insights into how trade and trade policy can support climate and environmental goals, including the clean energy transition, decarbonization of industry and transport, climate adaptation, and biodiversity. The document also has a section on lessons learned and key messages for policymakers at both national and multilateral levels, along with a forward-looking vision for TESSD’s future work.
    Delegates welcomed the co-convenors’ draft outline for this overarching MC14 output as a good basis for further discussion, recognizing its value in consolidating five years of substantive work and enhancing transparency and understanding for a wide range of policymakers and stakeholders.
    Some members emphasized the importance of maintaining balance across different objectives, while others called for better integration of cross-cutting themes. Several delegates highlighted the importance of including case studies from members at different levels of development  to reflect diverse experiences. Others stressed that the document should remain non-prescriptive.
    In conclusion, Ambassador Saborío thanked participants for their constructive feedback. He reaffirmed TESSD’s commitment to helping members leverage trade to achieve environmental objectives. He said: “Over the past five years, TESSD has made remarkable progress toward its goals. We have created a platform for meaningful dialogue — one that is innovative, creative, active and transparent.” He encouraged continued collaboration in the lead-up to MC14 and assured members that their inputs would be reflected in the revised outcome document.
    More information
    Guided by its 2021 Ministerial Statement, TESSD seeks to complement the work of the WTO Committee on Trade and Environment and advance discussions at the intersection of trade and environmental sustainability towards identifying concrete actions that members could take individually or collectively. The initiative, which is open to all WTO members, is currently co-sponsored by 78 members representing all regions and all levels of development.

    Share

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Infected Blood Inquiry Additional Report: Oral Statement to Parliament

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Oral statement to Parliament

    Infected Blood Inquiry Additional Report: Oral Statement to Parliament

    This page provides a copy of the Minister for the Cabinet Office’s Oral Statement to the House of Commons on 21 July, made in response to the publication of the Infected Blood Inquiry’s Additional Report on 9 July 2025.

    Mr Speaker, the Infected Blood Inquiry’s Additional Report was published on 9th July. Today, I would like to provide the House with an initial response to that report.

    I am grateful to Sir Brian Langstaff for seeking justice for victims of the Infected Blood Scandal and for the Inquiry’s constructive Additional Report. His ambition to ensure that fair compensation is provided to every person that is eligible without delay resonates across the country.

    Delivery progress

    Mr Speaker, before considering the detail of the report, I wanted to share the latest statistics from the Infected Blood Compensation Authority. As of 15 July, IBCA has contacted 2,215 people to begin their claim for compensation, with 1,934 having started the claim process. 808 offers of compensation have been made, with a total value of over £602 million. 587 people have accepted their offer and received payment, with over £411 million paid in compensation. This means approximately 60% of infected people registered with a support scheme have been contacted to begin their claim.

    I am pleased that progress is being made, but I acknowledge the calls from the community highlighting the need for faster payment. This is why the Government wrote to the Public Accounts and the Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committees last month outlining the steps we are taking to remove administrative barriers to allow IBCA to speed up payments.

    I am also pleased to announce further interim payments of £210,000 to the estates of infected people who were registered to an infected blood support scheme and have sadly passed away. This is in addition to the over 500 interim payments of £100,00 already paid to estates. I will provide further information on this as soon as I am able, including on timelines for applications opening.

    Additional Report Recommendations 

    Mr Speaker, the Government is committed to providing fair compensation to victims of the infected blood scandal, and in the Autumn Budget we set aside £11.8 billion to do just that. The Inquiry has recognised the Government’s commitment, saying ‘there can be no doubt that the Government has done right in ways which powerfully signal its intent.’ 

    However, I agree with Sir Brian’s statement that ‘there is still more to be done to ensure that the detail and operation of the scheme matches up to its intent’. 

    Sir Brian has made a number of recommendations on ways the compensation scheme could be amended to achieve a scheme which works for everyone. We will publish an update on gov.uk today setting out the Government’s approach to the Inquiry’s further recommendations. I will deposit a copy of that update in the House libraries. We will also provide a comprehensive response to all the recommendations in due course.

    The report includes several recommendations for IBCA on speed and transparency. I want to first reiterate that the Government still expects IBCA to contact all registered infected people to begin a claim, and to open the service for affected people, by the end of this year and the announcements I’m about to make do not change that position.

    On Friday, Sir Robert Francis and David Foley confirmed they will be accepting the recommendations the Inquiry made to IBCA. They have committed to working with the community to develop plans for designing and implementing these recommendations.

    IBCA will design and introduce a process for registration. 

    They will also update their sequencing in line with the Inquiry’s recommendation, noting that this will inform the order in which they open up to cohorts this year. 

    IBCA will introduce a process for prioritisation, recognising that community involvement is needed in tackling any uncertainty which this may introduce.

    Alongside this, I have asked for a review of IBCA’s delivery of the scheme to ensure that it is progressing as quickly as possible. This will be supported by the National Infrastructure and Service Transformation Authority, NISTA, and led by an independent reviewer. I expect the review to begin in August.

    Now the Inquiry has made detailed recommendations across 9 key areas to ensure that infected and affected people feel that they have, overall, been compensated fairly, by a scheme that is designed and delivered with their input. Separate to the delivery of compensation by IBCA, the Inquiry has made recommendations relating to the design and structure of the scheme. Seven of these sub-recommendations, the Government will accept and implement as soon as we can, so that IBCA can get on with paying compensation. Others will require engagement with the community before changes are made, in line with the spirit of the Inquiry’s report.

    Now when I gave evidence to the Inquiry in May, I said that I would take a constructive approach and look at the issues which had been put to me. The Inquiry has made eight sub-recommendations in these areas. I am pleased to confirm that I am either accepting these, or agreeing with the Inquiry that the community should be consulted on next steps. 

    So I can confirm that we will remove the 1982 start date for HIV infection, to ensure anyone infected due to infected blood or blood products with HIV is eligible for the scheme, regardless of infection date. 

    We accept the Inquiry’s recommendation on affected estates; in fact, Mr. Speaker, we are going further than their recommendation. The Inquiry recommended that where someone who would be an eligible affected person sadly died or dies between 21 May 2024 and 31 December 2029, their claim will not die with them but becomes part of their estate. I am actually going to extend that period by an extra two years, to 31 December 2031.

    The Special Category Mechanism, I know has been a concern for members of the community and this House. I am pleased to say that we accept change is needed to acknowledge SCM as part of the supplementary route Severe Health Condition Award, and we will be engaging the community on how to best realise these changes. 

    Another area I committed to consider was to reinstate support payments to partners bereaved after 31 March 2025 until they receive their compensation. We are accepting this recommendation, and will ensure that those impacted will also be able to continue receiving those payments as part of their compensation package. 

    The issue of unethical research is one of the most shocking aspects of this scandal. I can confirm that we will be consulting on revising the approach for the additional autonomy award on unethical research, including the scope and value of the award. 

    The final area I said I would consider was whether further supplementary routes for affected people could be introduced. The Inquiry recommended we consult to understand the feasibility of how these could be implemented, alongside changes regarding the exceptional financial loss award. I agree with the Inquiry that consideration should be given to these issues, and that consideration rightly involves those impacted.

    In addition, we are accepting further Inquiry recommendations to remove the requirement for evidence of the date of diagnosis of Hepatitis B or C, which we hope may allow claims for those mono-infected with hepatitis to be processed more quickly. 

    By accepting these recommendations today, we can start to implement the necessary changes as soon as possible.

    There are several recommendations on areas where changes to the Scheme are needed. We intend to engage the community on how to best achieve them. The Inquiry is clear: people impacted by decisions need to be involved in them. That is what we will seek to do before implementing these changes to the scheme. 

    This includes acting on recommendations regarding compensation for the impacts of Interferon. We will introduce a new core route infection severity band for those who received interferon treatment, and consult on the evidence requirements and threshold for a supplementary route award for severe psychological harm. 

    Additionally, we will work with IBCA to introduce a mechanism that individuals can use to raise concerns to aid continuous improvement of the Scheme.

    I’m sure honourable members will understand that to do this the Government will need to make further regulations. Our top priority is to move quickly, so to make some of the simpler changes we will bring forward a set of regulations as soon as Parliamentary time allows.

    These regulations will not implement all the policy changes recommended by the Inquiry. In evidence to the Inquiry in May, I said that I was open to changes that do not lead to further delays. I believe that by making these changes recommended by the Inquiry it will not delay the speed at which offers are currently being made. 

    A further set of regulations will be needed to implement the more substantial changes, particularly those where we are taking time to engage the community on how those updates can be realised. Therefore, we expect this second, more substantial set of regulations, to be brought before Parliament in 2026. But, we do not expect that this engagement will cause delays to the rollout of the compensation scheme as it currently stands which is absolutely crucial as I said to the Inquiry.

    Mr. Speaker, we are responding swiftly and constructively to Sir Brian, and putting the voices – and needs – of the community first. 

    Progress on Inquiry’s 2024 Report

    Mr Speaker, I would also like to provide a further update on the Government’s response to the Inquiry’s 2024 report. I have continued to engage with the charities named by the Inquiry in recommendation 10. I recognise their concerns about the allocated funding and can confirm that the Department for Health and Social Care is re-examining funding for this year and will look at options for the future. 

    With regard to recommendation 2, on memorialisation, I am pleased to announce that, following engagement with the community, Clive Smith has been appointed as the Chair of the Memorial Committee. I am delighted to be able to appoint a Chair with his wealth of experience. I am confident he will be able to bring the community together to make great progress on this work. 

    Mr Speaker, this Government has made progress on implementing the recommendations made by this Inquiry. But progress is never a foregone conclusion. Sir Brian is clear about the importance of scrutinising progress in delivering what the Government has committed. I agree. Therefore, I am pleased to confirm that I have asked PACAC to take on the role of scrutinising implementation of the Inquiry’s recommendations in both the May 2024 and July 2025 reports. It is for the Committee to outline how they approach this work but I trust that they will see fit to follow the example of the Inquiry thorough scrutiny of the design and delivery of compensation to the community. 

    In addition, today I am publishing a record of Inquiry recommendations and the government response on gov.uk, as promised in our response to the recommendation of the Grenfell Tower Inquiry. These records will be periodically updated to show implementation progress, and will include all recommendations of future inquiries.

    Mr Speaker, to conclude I would like to quote directly from Sir Brian’s report, where he ends by stating that ‘truly involving people infected and affected in how the state recognises their losses would start to turn the page on the past’.

    He is absolutely right. Our focus as we move forward must be working together with the community, with IBCA, and indeed with each other in this House to not only deliver justice to all those impacted, but essentially, to restore trust in the state to people who have been let down too many times. 

    I commend this statement to the House.

    Updates to this page

    Published 21 July 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom