Category: Farming

  • MIL-OSI: XRP News: XenDex Presale Begins As XRP ETF Builds Momentum

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    SYDNEY, April 23, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — XenDex is thrilled to announce the first AI-powered all-in-one decentralized exchange (DEX) built on XRP, combining non-custodial lending and borrowing, AI copy trading, and DAO governance in a single user-centric platform.

    Currently, excitement grows across the crypto industry amid increasing speculation of a pending XRP Spot ETF launch, a new decentralized finance project, XenDex is seizing the moment to reshape the XRP Ledger ecosystem.With XRP (which is designed for speed, scalability, and community participation) gaining mainstream attention once again and institutional capital eyeing the asset class, XenDex is poised to become a major infrastructure player on the XRP Ledger and is set to redefine how users trade, earn, and govern on-chain.

    Buy $XDX Token Now

    The new Ripple based platform is ready to offer its presale, ready to raise major funds in record time, the new XRP project has become the talk of the XRP community and investors are already jumping onboard, convinced XDX will deliver massive returns and position itself as XRP’s breakout altcoin by 2025.

    XenDex promotes itself as a transformative platform combining the power of Artificial Intelligence (AI) with an ultra-fast and low-fee XRP Ledger (XRPL).

    Join XenDex Presale

    XenDex has officially revealed its $XDX token presale will commence on April 22, 2025, offering early adopters first access to one of XRP’s most ambitious DeFi platforms to date. The $XDX token serves as the utility and governance currency powering all features across the XenDex ecosystem.

    The buzz around a potential XRP ETF approval has fueled optimism across the Ripple community. Institutional interest, growing liquidity, and infrastructure upgrades are aligning — and XenDex is launching at the perfect time to capture this surge in demand.

    Features of XenDex

    • Lending & Borrowing – Access liquidity or earn passive income via secure, smart contract-based loans.
    • AI Copy Trading – Automatically mirror top traders in real-time using our AI-powered copy engine.
    • Spot & Perpetual Trading – Trade instantly via an embedded AMM with zero custodial risk.
    • Liquidity Farming & Staking – Earn $XDX rewards for providing liquidity or staking tokens.
    • DAO Governance – Every $XDX token holder can vote on key upgrades, listings, and ecosystem decisions.
    • Cross-Chain Compatibility – Future support for Ethereum, BNB, Cardano, and more.

    Tokenomics at a Glance

    • Token Ticker: $XDX
    • Total Supply: 1,000,000,000
    • Presale Allocation: 300,000,000 XDX
    • Utilities: Governance, staking, platform fees, airdrops, and more.

    Buy XDX Tokens

    Smart contracts are currently undergoing comprehensive audits, and the platform will be fully non-custodial with transparent DAO-based governance. Early adopters participating in the presale will benefit from staking rewards, airdrops, and priority access to upcoming product launches.

    As the market looks toward a possible XRP ETF launch, projects like XenDex are building the infrastructure needed to support this wave of adoption. With its blend of automation, community empowerment, and high-speed execution, XenDex is positioning itself as the primary DeFi gateway for XRP-based assets.

    Join the Movement Now!

    Website: xendex.net
    Presalehttps://xendex.net/presale/
    Telegram: t.me/XenDexCommunity
    Twitter/X: https://x.com/xendex_xrp

    Contact:
    Frank Richards
    Frank@xendex.net

    Disclaimer: This is a paid post provided by XenDex. The statements, views, and opinions expressed in this content are solely those of the content provider and do not necessarily reflect the views of this media platform or its publisher. We do not endorse, verify, or guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of any information presented. We do not guarantee any claims, statements, or promises made in this article. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial, investment, or trading advice.Investing in crypto and mining-related opportunities involves significant risks, including the potential loss of capital. It is possible to lose all your capital. These products may not be suitable for everyone, and you should ensure that you understand the risks involved. Seek independent advice if necessary. Speculate only with funds that you can afford to lose. Readers are strongly encouraged to conduct their own research and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. However, due to the inherently speculative nature of the blockchain sector—including cryptocurrency, NFTs, and mining—complete accuracy cannot always be guaranteed.Neither the media platform nor the publisher shall be held responsible for any fraudulent activities, misrepresentations, or financial losses arising from the content of this press release. In the event of any legal claims or charges against this article, we accept no liability or responsibility. Globenewswire does not endorse any content on this page.

    Legal Disclaimer: This media platform provides the content of this article on an “as-is” basis, without any warranties or representations of any kind, express or implied. We assume no responsibility for any inaccuracies, errors, or omissions. We do not assume any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information presented herein. Any concerns, complaints, or copyright issues related to this article should be directed to the content provider mentioned above.

    A photo accompanying this announcement is available at https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/60b77089-cac2-4335-91ba-8e81462cc098

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: WISeKey Expands Implementation of Digital Identity Solutions from Seychelles to Africa: Empowering Nations with Secure National ID Systems

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    WISeKey Expands Implementation of Digital Identity Solutions from Seychelles to Africa: Empowering Nations with Secure National ID Systems

    Geneva, Switzerland – April 23, 2025 — WISeKey International Holding Ltd (“WISeKey”) (SIX: WIHN, NASDAQ: WKEY), a leading global cybersecurity, blockchain, and IoT company, today announces that following the successful implementation of “SeyID” in the Seychelles, it is extending proven digital identity solutions to other African nations to help them modernize and secure their national identification systems.

    Since 2022, WISeKey has collaborated with the government of Seychelles to launch SeyID, a comprehensive, secure, and user-friendly digital ID platform. Designed to integrate seamlessly with both public and private sector services, SeyID is now serving as a model for other African nations looking to establish or upgrade their national identity infrastructure.

    A Blueprint for Digital Transformation

    The SeyID platform leverages WISeKey’s trusted WISeID digital identity technology, which provides citizens with a mobile-accessible, secure virtual ID linked to key public services. These include healthcare, government portals, and the tourism industry, vital economic pillars for Seychelles.

    Through SeyID, citizens are able to complement their traditional physical ID cards with a virtual identity stored securely on their smartphones, making authentication easier and services more accessible. Tourists visiting Seychelles can also generate a digital Tourist ID using SeyID, which offers a frictionless digital experience while allowing visitors to access local services. This innovation has positioned Seychelles as a digital pioneer in the African region, providing a strong example of how national digital identity platforms can support economic growth and government efficiency.

    Scaling the Model Across Africa

    WISeKey is now in discussions with several African governments to replicate the SeyID model, tailoring it to meet local needs and regulatory frameworks. These next-generation digital ID solutions aim to:

    • Promote Financial Inclusion by enabling secure digital onboarding and Know Your Customer (KYC) compliance for banking services;
    • Streamline Public Administration by digitizing identity verification for social programs, healthcare, and education;
    • Enhance Tourism and Cross-Border Travel with digital tourist ID systems similar to that of Seychelles; and,
    • Protect Citizen Data with robust Swiss-grade cybersecurity and encryption.

    Use Cases: National Digital IDs as Catalysts for Economic Growth

    1. Digital Financial Services:
      A national digital ID allows unbanked populations to open bank accounts, access credit, and use mobile payment platforms securely, boosting participation in the formal economy and reducing reliance on cash.
    2. e-Government Services:
      Digital IDs facilitate efficient delivery of public services such as tax filing, business registration, land ownership verification, and social welfare programs, increasing transparency and reducing corruption.
    3. Agricultural Supply Chains:
      Farmers can register digitally to receive subsidies, track inputs, and access markets. This fosters trust, increases productivity, and reduces fraud in government support schemes.
    4. Healthcare Access:
      Verified digital IDs help in creating unified health records, ensuring that citizens receive timely, targeted, and secure healthcare, even across borders through regional interoperability.
    5. Job Market Activation:
      With a verifiable identity, citizens can access vocational training, apply for jobs online, and participate in gig economy platforms, driving workforce participation and economic inclusion.
    6. Entrepreneurship & Innovation:
      Startups and SMEs can benefit from streamlined licensing and easier access to investment through identity-based digital platforms, reducing bureaucratic delays and stimulating innovation.
    7. Tourism Growth:
      Digital tourist IDs simplify visa issuance, hotel check-ins, and tourist service access, creating a smoother visitor experience and increasing tourism revenues.
    8. Education & Youth Empowerment:
      Digital IDs allow students to enroll in programs, access e-learning platforms, and validate academic credentials, enhancing skills development for the digital economy.
    9. A Human-Centered, Privacy-First Approach

    WISeKey’s approach is grounded in respecting human dignity and data privacy. All identities created under its platforms are anchored in the OISTE.ORG Root of Trust, a globally recognized cryptographic trust model that guarantees sovereign control over digital identities.

    With the support of international development agencies and local governments, WISeKey is set to deliver customized digital ID solutions that are interoperable, future-proof, and aligned with international standards for data protection and digital governance.

    As Africa accelerates its digital transformation, WISeKey’s expansion beyond Seychelles marks a critical step in ensuring that secure, inclusive, and innovative identity solutions are at the heart of the continent’s technological and economic future.

    For more information, visit www.wisekey.com or follow WISeKey on LinkedIn and Twitter.

    About WISeKey

    WISeKey International Holding Ltd (“WISeKey”, SIX: WIHN; Nasdaq: WKEY) is a global leader in cybersecurity, digital identity, and IoT solutions platform. It operates as a Swiss-based holding company through several operational subsidiaries, each dedicated to specific aspects of its technology portfolio. The subsidiaries include (i) SEALSQ Corp (Nasdaq: LAES), which focuses on semiconductors, PKI, and post-quantum technology products, (ii) WISeKey SA which specializes in RoT and PKI solutions for secure authentication and identification in IoT, Blockchain, and AI, (iii) WISeSat AG which focuses on space technology for secure satellite communication, specifically for IoT applications, (iv) WISe.ART Corp which focuses on trusted blockchain NFTs and operates the WISe.ART marketplace for secure NFT transactions, and (v) SEALCOIN AG which focuses on decentralized physical internet with DePIN technology and house the development of the SEALCOIN platform.

    Each subsidiary contributes to WISeKey’s mission of securing the internet while focusing on their respective areas of research and expertise. Their technologies seamlessly integrate into the comprehensive WISeKey platform. WISeKey secures digital identity ecosystems for individuals and objects using Blockchain, AI, and IoT technologies. With over 1.6 billion microchips deployed across various IoT sectors, WISeKey plays a vital role in securing the Internet of Everything. The company’s semiconductors generate valuable Big Data that, when analyzed with AI, enable predictive equipment failure prevention. Trusted by the OISTE/WISeKey cryptographic Root of Trust, WISeKey provides secure authentication and identification for IoT, Blockchain, and AI applications. The WISeKey Root of Trust ensures the integrity of online transactions between objects and people. For more information on WISeKey’s strategic direction and its subsidiary companies, please visit www.wisekey.com.

    Disclaimer
    This communication expressly or implicitly contains certain forward-looking statements concerning WISeKey International Holding Ltd and its business. Such statements involve certain known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which could cause the actual results, financial condition, performance or achievements of WISeKey International Holding Ltd to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. WISeKey International Holding Ltd is providing this communication as of this date and does not undertake to update any forward-looking statements contained herein as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

    This press release does not constitute an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, any securities, and it does not constitute an offering prospectus within the meaning of the Swiss Financial Services Act (“FinSA”), the FinSa’s predecessor legislation or advertising within the meaning of the FinSA. Investors must rely on their own evaluation of WISeKey and its securities, including the merits and risks involved. Nothing contained herein is, or shall be relied on as, a promise or representation as to the future performance of WISeKey.

    Press and Investor Contacts

    WISeKey International Holding Ltd
    Company Contact: Carlos Moreira
    Chairman & CEO
    Tel: +41 22 594 3000
    info@wisekey.com 
    WISeKey Investor Relations (US) 
    The Equity Group Inc.
    Lena Cati
    Tel: +1 212 836-9611
    lcati@equityny.com

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: Foreign Minister Lin and Tuvaluan Deputy Prime Minister Nelesone witness signing of agreements on labor cooperation and seafarer training and certification

    Source: Republic of China Taiwan

    Foreign Minister Lin and Tuvaluan Deputy Prime Minister Nelesone witness signing of agreements on labor cooperation and seafarer training and certification

    Date:2025-04-16
    Data Source:Department of East Asian and Pacific Affairs

    April 16, 2025  
    No. 097  

    Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung met with a Tuvaluan delegation led by Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance and Economic Development Panapasi Nelesone and his wife, Madame Corinna Laafai, at the Taipei Guest House on April 15. Together, they witnessed the signing of two bilateral agreements—one on labor cooperation and another on the recognition of training and certification of seafarers. These agreements, which were signed respectively by Minister of Labor Hung Sun-han and Minister of Transportation and Communications Chen Shih-kai for Taiwan and by Minister of Foreign Affairs, Labour and Trade Paulson Panapa for Tuvalu, aim to deepen bilateral exchanges and cooperation in such domains as labor affairs, fisheries, and seafarer certification. 

    Following the signing ceremony, Minister Lin hosted a banquet for the delegation at the Taipei Guest House. In his speech, he warmly welcomed them and thanked the government of Tuvalu for its long-standing and unwavering support of Taiwan’s international participation, including speaking up for Taiwan at major international events. Minister Lin expressed special appreciation to the Ministry of Labor (MOL) and the Ministry of Transportation and Communications (MOTC) for coordinating with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) to facilitate the signing of the two agreements. He indicated that they bolstered Taiwan-Tuvalu cooperation and marked the concrete implementation of the Diplomatic Allies Prosperity Project under the policy of integrated diplomacy. He also noted that they aligned with the concept of every ministry serving as a foreign ministry and every citizen as a diplomat. Minister Lin emphasized that MOFA had actively consolidated the diverse capabilities of government agencies and civil society, leveraging overall national strength to enhance cooperation between Taiwan and its diplomatic allies. Moving forward, he pledged to work hand in hand with the government of Tuvalu to expand exchanges across a variety of domains to promote economic prosperity and the well-being of the peoples of both countries. 

    Speaking at the banquet, Deputy Prime Minister Nelesone stated that in 46 years as diplomatic allies, Taiwan and Tuvalu had jointly responded to numerous challenges and created myriad opportunities for close cooperation in such areas as health care, agriculture, education, and basic infrastructure. He affirmed that the two nations had built a diplomatic alliance founded on freedom and democracy, adding that they shared strong bonds and were like family. On behalf of the government and people of Tuvalu, he sincerely thanked Taiwan for its long-term support of his nation’s development and reaffirmed Tuvalu’s staunch commitment to backing Taiwan’s international participation. He expressed the hope that both countries would continue working together to advance their diplomatic partnership, setting an example for the world.

    Guests at the banquet included Deputy Minister of Health and Welfare Lin Ching-yi; Acting Director General of the MOL Workforce Development Agency Chen Shih-chang; Deputy Director General of the Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries Agency Lin Ding-rong; Director General of the MOTC Maritime and Port Bureau Yeh Hsieh-lung; Secretary General of the International Cooperation and Development Fund Huang Yu-lin; and representatives from the business sector. Participants exchanged views on a wide range of issues, including health care, climate change adaptation, and agricultural and fisheries cooperation. (E)

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-OSI Global: Trump is stripping protections from marine protected areas – why that’s a problem for fishing’s future, and for whales, corals and other ocean life

    Source: The Conversation – USA – By David Shiffman, Faculty Research Associate in Marine Biology, Arizona State University

    The coral reefs of Palmyra Atoll, part of Pacific Islands Heritage Marine National Monument, provide nurseries for many fish species. Andrew S. Wright/U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service via Flickr, CC BY-SA

    The single greatest threat to the diversity of life in our oceans over the past 50 years, more than climate change or plastic pollution, has been unsustainable fishing practices.

    In much of the ocean, there is little to no regulation or oversight of commercial fishing or other human activities. That’s part of the reason about a tenth of marine plant and animal species are considered threatened or at risk.

    It’s also why countries around the world have been creating marine protected areas.

    These protected areas, covering over 11.6 million square miles (30 million square kilometers) in 16,000 locations, offer refuge away from human activities for a wide variety of living creatures, from corals to sea turtles and whales. They give fish stocks a place to thrive, and those fish spread out into the surrounding waters, which helps fishing industries and local economies.

    In the U.S., however, marine protection is being dismantled by President Donald Trump.

    Marine protected areas as of 2022. Fully or highly protected areas represented less than 3% of the ocean, according to the Marine Protection Atlas.
    Marine Conservation Institute via Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA

    Trump issued a proclamation on April 17, 2025, titled “Unleashing American commercial fishing in the Pacific,” ordering the removal of key protections to allow commercial fishing in parts of a nearly-500,000-square-mile marine protected area called the Pacific Island Heritage National Marine Monument.

    He also called for a review of all other marine national monuments to decide if they should be opened to commercial fishing too. In addition, the Trump administration is proposing to redefine “harm” under the Endangered Species Act in a way that would allow for more damage to these species’ habitats.

    I’m a marine biologist and scuba diver, and it’s no accident that all my favorite dive sites are within marine protected areas. I’ve found what scientific studies from across the world show: Protected areas have much healthier marine life populations and healthier ecosystems.

    What’s at risk in the Pacific

    The Pacific Island Heritage National Marine Monument, about 750 miles west of Hawaii, is dotted by coral reefs and atolls, with species of fish, marine mammals and birds rarely found anywhere else.

    It is home to protected and endangered species, including turtles, whales and Hawaiian monk seals. Palmyra Atoll and Kingman Reef, both within the area, are considered among the most pristine coral reefs in the world, each providing habitats for a wide range of fish and other species.

    These marine species are able to thrive there and spread out into the surrounding waters because their habitats have been protected.

    A tour of several marine protected areas and their inhabitants in 2016.

    President George W. Bush, a conservative Republican, created this protected area in 2009, restricting fishing there, and President Barack Obama later expanded it. Trump, whose administration has made no secret of its aim to strip away environmental protections across the country’s land and waters, is now reopening much of the marine protected area to industrial-scale fishing.

    The risks from industrial fishing

    When too many fish are killed and too few young fish are left to replace them, it’s considered overfishing, and this has become a growing problem around the world.

    In 1974, about 10% of the world’s fish stocks were overfished. By 2021, that number had risen to 37.7%, according to the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization’s annual State of Fisheries and Aquaculture Report.

    A fishing net caught on a coral reef can destroy habitat.
    Kampee Patisena/Moment/Getty Images

    Modern industrial-scale fishing practices can also harm other species.

    Bycatch, or catching animals that fishermen don’t want but are inadvertently caught up in nets and other gear, is a threat to many endangered species. Many seabirds, sea turtles and whales die this way each year. Some types of fishing gear, such as trawls and dredges that drag along the sea floor to scoop up sea life, can destroy ocean habitat itself.

    Without regulations or protected areas, fishing can turn into a competitive free-for-all that can deplete fish stocks.

    How marine protected areas protect species

    Marine protected areas are designed to safeguard parts of the ocean from human impacts, including offshore oil and gas extraction and industrial fishing practices.

    Studies have found that these areas can produce many benefits for both marine life and fishermen by allowing overfished species to recover and ensuring their health for the future.

    A decade after Mexico established the Cabo Pulmo protected area, for example, fish biomass increased by nearly 500%.

    How marine protected areas help marine life and local economies.

    Successful marine protected areas tend to have healthier habitats, more fish, more species of fish, and bigger fish than otherwise-similar unprotected areas. Studies have found the average size of organisms to be 28% bigger in these areas than in fished areas with no protections. How many babies a fish has is directly related to the size of the mother.

    All of this helps create jobs through ecotourism and support local fishing communities outside the marine protected area.

    Marine protected areas also have a “spillover effect” – the offspring of healthy fish populations that spawn inside these areas often spread beyond them, helping fish populations outside the boundaries thrive as well.

    Ultimately, the fishing industry benefits from a continuing supply. And all of this happens at little cost.

    A need for more protected areas, not fewer

    Claims by the Trump administration that marine protected areas are a heavy-handed restriction on the U.S. fishing industry do not hold water. As science and my own experience show, these refuges for sea life can instead help local economies and the industry by allowing fish populations to thrive.

    For the future of the planet’s whales, sea turtles, coral reefs and the health of fishing itself, scientists like me recommend creating more marine protected areas to help species thrive, not dismantling them.

    David Shiffman has consulted for many environmental non-profit groups including the Ocean Conservancy, as well as fishing industry groups and fisheries managment agencies.

    ref. Trump is stripping protections from marine protected areas – why that’s a problem for fishing’s future, and for whales, corals and other ocean life – https://theconversation.com/trump-is-stripping-protections-from-marine-protected-areas-why-thats-a-problem-for-fishings-future-and-for-whales-corals-and-other-ocean-life-254925

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI Global: VAT hikes can raise tax without hurting the poor: an economist sets out the evidence

    Source: The Conversation – Africa – By Imraan Valodia, Pro Vice-Chancellor, Climate, Sustainability and Inequality and Director, Southern Centre for Inequality Studies, University of the Witwatersrand

    South Africa’s 2025-6 budget has been subjected to more comment than usual. This is due to the political tensions generated by a proposed increase in value added tax (VAT).

    South Africa’s choices on how it manages the revenue and expenditure issues in the budget are critical for how the larger issues of the country’s debt and its economic policies are handled. As things stand, the economy is locked into a low-growth trajectory which make the debt, revenue and expenditure issues more difficult to deal with.

    This piece draws on a longer article which explores these issues in greater detail. Here, I focus only on the VAT issue.

    The finance minister originally tabled an increase of 2 percentage points, then changed it to 0.5 percentage points. Still, it is threatening to end the country’s government of national unity, which was set up after elections in 2024.




    Read more:
    South Africa’s finance minister wanted to raise VAT: the pros and cons of a tricky tax


    Most commentators, including the political parties that have opposed the proposal, many academics, and non-governmental organisations claiming to represent low-income groups, have argued that an increase in VAT places an undue burden on low-income groups. This would make it regressive.

    Based on work as an academic economist over the past three decades, I believe that the debate has been based largely on conjecture and ideological opposition to VAT, rather than on the evidence of its impact.

    This is a pity as there is empirical evidence rooted in research that a VAT increase is, in fact, not regressive and is therefore a good policy decision.

    Tax experts usually refer to the three Es in taxes – equity, efficiency and ease of administration – for evaluating tax policy proposals. New taxes should ideally promote equity (they should be progressive and not regressive), be efficient and be easy to administer.

    An increase in VAT in South Africa ticks all these boxes.

    First, contrary to what many commentators have been arguing, VAT isn’t always regressive – it depends on how it’s implemented. As proposed by the finance minister it would not be regressive because, while it would add to the burden of low-income households, most of the VAT would be collected from higher-income households. Added to this is that the proposed expansion of the existing list of zero-rated items would protect the lowest-income households.

    Second, VAT is a very efficient tax. For relatively low increases in the rate, government is able to raise a large amount of revenue.

    Finally, the system is easy to administer and adds very little cost to collection.

    Key to its efficacy is the way VAT is implemented, including the choice of products to zero rate, and the political credibility of government.

    The case for a VAT increase

    VAT is a consumption tax, so it only affects the income that a household consumes.

    According to the International Monetary Fund (IMF), VAT is now the mainstay of tax systems in over 160 countries, raising on average one-third of total government revenues.

    In theory, there are good reasons to be concerned about the impact of VAT. First, it can place a high burden on low-income households because they spend a large proportion of their incomes on consumption goods such as food.

    Second, VAT may also place a heavy burden of tax on women. In South Africa and many other countries, women-led households tend to be clustered in the lower end of the income distribution. And women disproportionately take responsibility for feeding and caring for family members.

    So, at least in theory, VAT is a regressive tax. But is it really so in practice?

    Three studies that have explored this issue in some detail have concluded that, in South Africa, VAT is not regressive.

    In 2008, I worked with colleagues in eight countries (South Africa, Ghana, Uganda, Morocco, Mexico, Argentina, India and the United Kingdom) on the gender issues related to tax. In particular we looked at the burden of VAT on low-income and women-headed households.

    Our findings were that, in general, VAT is regressive and discriminates against women, but it depends on how it is implemented.

    In South Africa, the zero-rating of basic consumption goods is very effective, protecting low-income and female-headed households from VAT. It’s an example of a VAT system that is neutral – neither regressive nor progressive.

    A more recent study by South African economist Ingrid Woolard and colleagues reached a similar conclusion in 2018.

    A third study was done in the same year when VAT was increased from 14% to 15%. Following a similar emotive debate, the finance minister appointed an independent committee which I served on and which was chaired by Woolard, to advise on further zero-rating.

    Our conclusion – again – was that zero-rating is highly effective at protecting low-income groups from the deleterious effects of VAT.

    How it’s done matters

    The challenge with zero-rating is that while low-income households benefit, high-income households benefit more (because they spend more, in absolute terms, on zero-rated goods). Large amounts of potential VAT revenue are lost to high-income groups that don’t need protection.

    The trick is to find a basket of goods that low-income households consume a lot of, but which high-income households don’t consume in large quantities. Some typical examples are beans, canned pilchards and cabbage. These are all goods that low-income households consume and high-income households do not.

    National Treasury’s proposals for increasing the basket of goods to be zero-rated are based on solid research.

    A good example of the trade-offs to consider is the case of chicken. Chicken is an important source of protein for low-income households, but also for high-income households. So, if all chicken were zero-rated, this would protect poor households, but a large amount of VAT revenue would be lost.

    In our 2018 zero-rating report, at 2018 prices and consumption patterns, we calculated that zero-rating all chicken products would be equivalent to R1.3 billion (US$67.6 million) but government would lose R4.6 billion (US$244.4 million) to high income households.

    Not a good trade-off.

    However, some chicken products, such as chicken heads and feet, are mostly consumed by low-income groups, and are therefore good candidates for zero-rating.

    The two other Es – efficiency and ease of administration – of taxes are also key to consider.

    On these two considerations, VAT has big advantages.

    It’s very difficult to avoid or evade VAT because it’s collected along the chain of production. There’s evidence that South Africa has very little leakage in the system.

    So it is relatively easy to increase the VAT rate without needing to invest additional resources to collect the tax.

    Credibility is key

    Apart from the economic considerations, tax policy has to be politically credible. People should believe that their tax contributions are being used effectively, and government should be seen to be acting in line with this.

    If people don’t believe in government’s ability to spend wisely, resistance to taxes increases. Then tax avoidance and evasion increases.

    It would be fair to say that, with the high levels of corruption in South Africa’s political system, government’s credibility is low.

    Thus, if VAT is to be increased, government has to do a lot more to improve its credibility and reassure South Africans that the tax revenues will be well spent.

    Imraan Valodia receives funding from a number of foundations and governments that support academic research.

    ref. VAT hikes can raise tax without hurting the poor: an economist sets out the evidence – https://theconversation.com/vat-hikes-can-raise-tax-without-hurting-the-poor-an-economist-sets-out-the-evidence-254213

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI Africa: Consumer inflation eases in March

    Source: South Africa News Agency

    Statistics South Africa (Stats SA) has announced that headline consumer inflation decreased for the first time in five months due to lower fuel prices and softer tuition inflation.

    According to Stats SA, inflation was edging lower to 2.7% in March from 3.2% in February. 

    “The fuel index softened by 0.4% from February, taking the annual rate from -3.6% to -8.8%. A litre of 95-octane petrol (inland) was R22.34 in March, down from R24.45 a year before. The average price for diesel declined to R22.80 from R24.85 over the same period.

    “Education fees are surveyed once a year in March. The price index for education increased by 4.5%, lower than the 6.4% rise in 2024. School fees increased by 5.0% (from 6.6% in 2024). Tertiary education institutions charged 3.7% more in 2025, compared with the 5.9% rise recorded the year before,” Stats SA said on Wednesday.

    Food inflation slightly softer in March

    The annual rate for food and non-alcoholic beverages (NAB) edged lower to 2.7% in March from 2.8% in February. 

    Vegetables, fruits and nuts, cereal products, meat and fish registered higher annual rates. 

    Lower rates were recorded for oils and fats; hot beverages; milk, other dairy products and eggs; cold beverages; and sugar, confectionery and desserts.

    “Inflation for cereal products accelerated to 4.3% in March from 3.9% in February. Maize meal remains a key driver in this category, with its annual rate accelerating to 13.1% from 10.6%. 

    “There is some good news, however. Monthly increases for maize meal have recently slowed, from 4.8% in January to 2.4% in February and 1.4% in March. Coffee and tea drinkers continue to feel pain. 

    “Although the annual rate for the hot beverages category declined slightly in March, it remains in double-digit territory at 14.4%. In fact, this category has witnessed double-digit inflation in all but 5 of the 32 months since August 2022,” Stats SA said.

    Instant coffee is 18.8% and black tea 12.8% more expensive than a year ago.

    Alcoholic beverages also added pressure, with prices rising on average by 2.1% between February and March. This took the annual rate to 4.7% from 4.1% in February. 

    Annual increases were recorded for wine (up 5.3%), beer (up 4.4%) and spirits and liqueurs (up 4.3%). – SAnews.gov.za

    MIL OSI Africa

  • MIL-OSI Africa: VAT hikes can raise tax without hurting the poor: an economist sets out the evidence

    Source: The Conversation – Africa – By Imraan Valodia, Pro Vice-Chancellor, Climate, Sustainability and Inequality and Director, Southern Centre for Inequality Studies, University of the Witwatersrand

    South Africa’s 2025-6 budget has been subjected to more comment than usual. This is due to the political tensions generated by a proposed increase in value added tax (VAT).

    South Africa’s choices on how it manages the revenue and expenditure issues in the budget are critical for how the larger issues of the country’s debt and its economic policies are handled. As things stand, the economy is locked into a low-growth trajectory which make the debt, revenue and expenditure issues more difficult to deal with.

    This piece draws on a longer article which explores these issues in greater detail. Here, I focus only on the VAT issue.

    The finance minister originally tabled an increase of 2 percentage points, then changed it to 0.5 percentage points. Still, it is threatening to end the country’s government of national unity, which was set up after elections in 2024.


    Read more: South Africa’s finance minister wanted to raise VAT: the pros and cons of a tricky tax


    Most commentators, including the political parties that have opposed the proposal, many academics, and non-governmental organisations claiming to represent low-income groups, have argued that an increase in VAT places an undue burden on low-income groups. This would make it regressive.

    Based on work as an academic economist over the past three decades, I believe that the debate has been based largely on conjecture and ideological opposition to VAT, rather than on the evidence of its impact.

    This is a pity as there is empirical evidence rooted in research that a VAT increase is, in fact, not regressive and is therefore a good policy decision.

    Tax experts usually refer to the three Es in taxes – equity, efficiency and ease of administration – for evaluating tax policy proposals. New taxes should ideally promote equity (they should be progressive and not regressive), be efficient and be easy to administer.

    An increase in VAT in South Africa ticks all these boxes.

    First, contrary to what many commentators have been arguing, VAT isn’t always regressive – it depends on how it’s implemented. As proposed by the finance minister it would not be regressive because, while it would add to the burden of low-income households, most of the VAT would be collected from higher-income households. Added to this is that the proposed expansion of the existing list of zero-rated items would protect the lowest-income households.

    Second, VAT is a very efficient tax. For relatively low increases in the rate, government is able to raise a large amount of revenue.

    Finally, the system is easy to administer and adds very little cost to collection.

    Key to its efficacy is the way VAT is implemented, including the choice of products to zero rate, and the political credibility of government.

    The case for a VAT increase

    VAT is a consumption tax, so it only affects the income that a household consumes.

    According to the International Monetary Fund (IMF), VAT is now the mainstay of tax systems in over 160 countries, raising on average one-third of total government revenues.

    In theory, there are good reasons to be concerned about the impact of VAT. First, it can place a high burden on low-income households because they spend a large proportion of their incomes on consumption goods such as food.

    Second, VAT may also place a heavy burden of tax on women. In South Africa and many other countries, women-led households tend to be clustered in the lower end of the income distribution. And women disproportionately take responsibility for feeding and caring for family members.

    So, at least in theory, VAT is a regressive tax. But is it really so in practice?

    Three studies that have explored this issue in some detail have concluded that, in South Africa, VAT is not regressive.

    In 2008, I worked with colleagues in eight countries (South Africa, Ghana, Uganda, Morocco, Mexico, Argentina, India and the United Kingdom) on the gender issues related to tax. In particular we looked at the burden of VAT on low-income and women-headed households.

    Our findings were that, in general, VAT is regressive and discriminates against women, but it depends on how it is implemented.

    In South Africa, the zero-rating of basic consumption goods is very effective, protecting low-income and female-headed households from VAT. It’s an example of a VAT system that is neutral – neither regressive nor progressive.

    A more recent study by South African economist Ingrid Woolard and colleagues reached a similar conclusion in 2018.

    A third study was done in the same year when VAT was increased from 14% to 15%. Following a similar emotive debate, the finance minister appointed an independent committee which I served on and which was chaired by Woolard, to advise on further zero-rating.

    Our conclusion – again – was that zero-rating is highly effective at protecting low-income groups from the deleterious effects of VAT.

    How it’s done matters

    The challenge with zero-rating is that while low-income households benefit, high-income households benefit more (because they spend more, in absolute terms, on zero-rated goods). Large amounts of potential VAT revenue are lost to high-income groups that don’t need protection.

    The trick is to find a basket of goods that low-income households consume a lot of, but which high-income households don’t consume in large quantities. Some typical examples are beans, canned pilchards and cabbage. These are all goods that low-income households consume and high-income households do not.

    National Treasury’s proposals for increasing the basket of goods to be zero-rated are based on solid research.

    A good example of the trade-offs to consider is the case of chicken. Chicken is an important source of protein for low-income households, but also for high-income households. So, if all chicken were zero-rated, this would protect poor households, but a large amount of VAT revenue would be lost.

    In our 2018 zero-rating report, at 2018 prices and consumption patterns, we calculated that zero-rating all chicken products would be equivalent to R1.3 billion (US$67.6 million) but government would lose R4.6 billion (US$244.4 million) to high income households.

    Not a good trade-off.

    However, some chicken products, such as chicken heads and feet, are mostly consumed by low-income groups, and are therefore good candidates for zero-rating.

    The two other Es – efficiency and ease of administration – of taxes are also key to consider.

    On these two considerations, VAT has big advantages.

    It’s very difficult to avoid or evade VAT because it’s collected along the chain of production. There’s evidence that South Africa has very little leakage in the system.

    So it is relatively easy to increase the VAT rate without needing to invest additional resources to collect the tax.

    Credibility is key

    Apart from the economic considerations, tax policy has to be politically credible. People should believe that their tax contributions are being used effectively, and government should be seen to be acting in line with this.

    If people don’t believe in government’s ability to spend wisely, resistance to taxes increases. Then tax avoidance and evasion increases.

    It would be fair to say that, with the high levels of corruption in South Africa’s political system, government’s credibility is low.

    Thus, if VAT is to be increased, government has to do a lot more to improve its credibility and reassure South Africans that the tax revenues will be well spent.

    – VAT hikes can raise tax without hurting the poor: an economist sets out the evidence
    – https://theconversation.com/vat-hikes-can-raise-tax-without-hurting-the-poor-an-economist-sets-out-the-evidence-254213

    MIL OSI Africa

  • MIL-OSI: Sprout Social Celebrates 15 Years of Innovation, Growth and Empowering Brands to Drive Revenue and Industry Impact on Social

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    • Sprout Social expanded and reimagined its core Social Media Management platform with AI-driven customer care, employee advocacy, analytics and influencer marketing solutions—releasing over 200 new product capabilities in 2024 alone.
    • The company increased its global footprint with a team of over 1,000 employees around the world, with offices in Chicago, Seattle, Dublin and a newly expanded presence in Krakow.
    • Since going public in 2019, Sprout has delivered a compound annual growth rate of 32% and now serves approximately 30,000 customers in more than 100 countries.

    CHICAGO, April 23, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Fifteen years ago, social media was an emerging curiosity and little understood tool that was often relegated to the margins of marketing strategies. Today, social media has evolved from a simple means for engagement to the epicenter of culture, commerce and connection. Social has become a mission-critical channel for brands, powering the entire customer journey and fueling business growth. Sprout Social (Nasdaq: SPT), an industry-leading provider of cloud-based social media management software, today celebrates 15 years of helping brands harness the ever-evolving power of social to build stronger connections and drive business-wide impact.

    “Social media has fundamentally changed where consumers spend their time and how they make decisions,” said Ryan Barretto, CEO of Sprout Social. “All business is social, and brands can’t rely on yesterday’s playbook. To win today, they need to be present where discovery, service, and loyalty happen—in real time, on social. We’ve spent 15 years building for this, and we’re just getting started.”

    Since going public in 2019, Sprout has delivered a strong 32% compound annual growth rate and supports approximately 30,000 customers in more than 100 countries. The company is powered by a global team of more than 1,000 employees with offices in Chicago, Seattle, Dublin, and Krakow.

    This moment in social is marked by swift advancements in AI, increased consumer expectations and the rise of the influencer as well as emerging platforms. Sprout has continuously evolved its platform to meet the growing complexity and importance of social. The company launched powerful solutions across analytics, employee advocacy, and customer care, while also expanding through strategic acquisitions to support robust listening and influencer marketing solutions as well as an accelerated AI technology roadmap. This commitment to customer-led innovation earned Sprout the #1 spot on G2’s 2024 Best Software Award.

    As recognition of this milestone and of the company’s market importance, Sprout Social will ring the Nasdaq Closing Bell today. Following the ceremony, Sprout Social executives will be joined by customers for a panel discussion that looks towards the future of social, highlighting the industry’s most impactful shifts from the rise of influencers to the growing use cases of AI.

    For more information about Sprout Social (NASDAQ: SPT), visit sproutsocial.com/about/allbusinessissocial/

    Social Media Profiles:
    www.x.com/SproutSocial
    www.x.com/SproutSocialIR
    www.facebook.com/SproutSocialInc
    www.linkedin.com/company/sprout-social-inc-/
    www.instagram.com/sproutsocial

    Contact
    Media:
    Kaitlyn Gronek
    Email: pr@sproutsocial.com
    Phone: (773) 904-9674

    Investors:
    Lexi Johnson
    Email: lexi.johnson@sproutsocial.com
    Phone: (312) 528-9166

    About Sprout Social

    Sprout Social is a global leader in social media management and analytics software, built on the belief that All Business is Social℠. Sprout’s intuitive platform puts powerful social data into the hands of approximately 30,000 brands so they can deliver smarter, faster business impact. Named the #1 Best Software Product by G2’s 2024 Best Software Award, Sprout offers comprehensive publishing and engagement functionality, customer care, influencer marketing, advocacy, and AI-powered business intelligence. Sprout’s software operates across all major social media networks and digital platforms.

    Forward-Looking Statements

    This press release contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “can,” “continue,” “could,” “enables,” “estimate,” “expect,” “explore,” “intend,” “long-term model,” “may,” “might” “outlook,” “plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “should,” “strategy,” “target,” “will,” “would,” or the negative of these terms, and similar expressions intended to identify forward-looking statements. However, not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words. These statements may relate to the success, performance, and effect on our business and customers of our product features, our market size and growth strategy, our estimated and projected costs, margins, revenue, expenditures and customer and financial growth rates, our plans and objectives for future operations, growth, initiatives or strategies. By their nature, these statements are subject to numerous uncertainties and risks, including factors beyond our control, that could cause actual results, performance or achievement to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated or implied in the forward-looking statements. These assumptions, uncertainties and risks include that, among others: we may not be able to sustain our revenue and customer growth rate in the future; price increases have and may continue to negatively impact demand for our products, customer acquisition and retention and reduce the total number of customers or customer additions; our business would be harmed by any significant interruptions, delays or outages in services from our platform, our API providers, or certain social media platforms; if we are unable to attract potential customers through unpaid channels, convert this traffic to free trials or convert free trials to paid subscriptions, our business and results of operations may be adversely affected; we may be unable to successfully enter new markets, manage our international expansion and comply with any applicable international laws and regulations; we may be unable to integrate acquired businesses or technologies successfully or achieve the expected benefits of such acquisitions and investments; unstable market and economic conditions, such as recession risks, effects of inflation, labor shortages, supply chain issues, high interest rates, and the impacts of current and potential future bank failures and impacts of ongoing overseas conflicts, could adversely impact our business and that of our existing and prospective customers, which may result in reduced demand for our products; we may not be able to generate sufficient cash to service our indebtedness; covenants in our credit agreement may restrict our operations, and if we do not effectively manage our business to comply with these covenants, our financial condition could be adversely impacted; any cybersecurity-related attack, significant data breach or disruption of the information technology systems or networks on which we rely could negatively affect our business; and changing regulations relating to privacy, information security and data protection could increase our costs, affect or limit how we collect and use personal information and harm our brand. Additional risks and uncertainties that could cause actual outcomes and results to differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements are included under the caption “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), including our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023 filed with the SEC on February 23, 2024, as well as any future reports that we file with the SEC. Moreover, you should interpret many of the risks identified in those reports as being heightened as a result of the current instability in market and economic conditions. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date the statements are made and are based on information available to Sprout Social at the time those statements are made and/or management’s good faith belief as of that time with respect to future events. Sprout Social assumes no obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date they were made, except as required by law.

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI China: Foreign Minister Lin and Tuvaluan Deputy Prime Minister Nelesone witness signing of agreements on labor cooperation and seafarer training and certification

    Source: Republic of Taiwan – Ministry of Foreign Affairs

    Foreign Minister Lin and Tuvaluan Deputy Prime Minister Nelesone witness signing of agreements on labor cooperation and seafarer training and certification

    • Date:2025-04-16
    • Data Source:Department of East Asian and Pacific Affairs

    April 16, 2025  

    No. 097  

    Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung met with a Tuvaluan delegation led by Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance and Economic Development Panapasi Nelesone and his wife, Madame Corinna Laafai, at the Taipei Guest House on April 15. Together, they witnessed the signing of two bilateral agreements—one on labor cooperation and another on the recognition of training and certification of seafarers. These agreements, which were signed respectively by Minister of Labor Hung Sun-han and Minister of Transportation and Communications Chen Shih-kai for Taiwan and by Minister of Foreign Affairs, Labour and Trade Paulson Panapa for Tuvalu, aim to deepen bilateral exchanges and cooperation in such domains as labor affairs, fisheries, and seafarer certification. 

    Following the signing ceremony, Minister Lin hosted a banquet for the delegation at the Taipei Guest House. In his speech, he warmly welcomed them and thanked the government of Tuvalu for its long-standing and unwavering support of Taiwan’s international participation, including speaking up for Taiwan at major international events. Minister Lin expressed special appreciation to the Ministry of Labor (MOL) and the Ministry of Transportation and Communications (MOTC) for coordinating with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) to facilitate the signing of the two agreements. He indicated that they bolstered Taiwan-Tuvalu cooperation and marked the concrete implementation of the Diplomatic Allies Prosperity Project under the policy of integrated diplomacy. He also noted that they aligned with the concept of every ministry serving as a foreign ministry and every citizen as a diplomat. Minister Lin emphasized that MOFA had actively consolidated the diverse capabilities of government agencies and civil society, leveraging overall national strength to enhance cooperation between Taiwan and its diplomatic allies. Moving forward, he pledged to work hand in hand with the government of Tuvalu to expand exchanges across a variety of domains to promote economic prosperity and the well-being of the peoples of both countries. 

    Speaking at the banquet, Deputy Prime Minister Nelesone stated that in 46 years as diplomatic allies, Taiwan and Tuvalu had jointly responded to numerous challenges and created myriad opportunities for close cooperation in such areas as health care, agriculture, education, and basic infrastructure. He affirmed that the two nations had built a diplomatic alliance founded on freedom and democracy, adding that they shared strong bonds and were like family. On behalf of the government and people of Tuvalu, he sincerely thanked Taiwan for its long-term support of his nation’s development and reaffirmed Tuvalu’s staunch commitment to backing Taiwan’s international participation. He expressed the hope that both countries would continue working together to advance their diplomatic partnership, setting an example for the world.

    Guests at the banquet included Deputy Minister of Health and Welfare Lin Ching-yi; Acting Director General of the MOL Workforce Development Agency Chen Shih-chang; Deputy Director General of the Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries Agency Lin Ding-rong; Director General of the MOTC Maritime and Port Bureau Yeh Hsieh-lung; Secretary General of the International Cooperation and Development Fund Huang Yu-lin; and representatives from the business sector. Participants exchanged views on a wide range of issues, including health care, climate change adaptation, and agricultural and fisheries cooperation. (E)

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI: ManTech Names Eric Mellinger Vice President of Business Development for Defense Sector

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    HERNDON, Va., April 23, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — ManTech, a leading provider of AI and mission-focused technology solutions, has promoted Eric “Mell” Mellinger to be Vice President of Business Development for the company’s Defense Sector.

    “With 30 years’ experience in senior-level military roles, Mell holds deep understanding of U.S. armed forces’ mission technology needs in virtually every battle scenario,” said David Hathaway, President of ManTech’s Defense Sector. “His strong alignment with every DoD agency is a win not only for ManTech, but for national security itself.”

    Since joining ManTech in 2019, Mellinger has been an instrumental force driving multiple DoD contract wins, including nearly $1 billion with the Marine Corps Warfighting Lab (MCWL) and Deputy Commandant for Information (DCI) in 2024.

    Prior to joining ManTech, Mellinger served as Senior Professional Staff Member for the House Armed Services Committee (HASC) focused on Defense Reform, helping develop the agenda for modernizing U.S. warfighting capabilities. During his military service, he commanded global crisis response missions in the Middle East, Africa and Indo-Pacific region.

    Mellinger graduated from the U.S. Air Force Academy and cross-commissioned into the U.S. Marine Corps. He holds M.S. degrees from National Defense University and Marine Corps University.

    About ManTech
    ManTech provides mission-focused technology solutions and services for U.S. Defense, Intelligence and Federal Civilian agencies. In business for more than 57 years, we are a leading provider of AI solutions that power full-spectrum cyber, data collection & analytics, enterprise IT, high-end engineering and software application development solutions that support national and homeland security. Additional information on ManTech can be found at www.mantech.com.

    Media Contact: 
    Jim Crawford 
    ManTech 
    Executive Director, External Communications 
    (M) 703-498-7315 
    James.Crawford2@ManTech.com

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI USA: Governor Newsom announces appointments 4.22.25

    Source: US State of California 2

    Apr 22, 2025

    SACRAMENTO – Governor Gavin Newsom today announced the following appointments:

    Claire Cullis, of Carmichael, has been appointed Deputy Secretary of Business and Consumer Relations at the California Business, Consumer Services, and Housing Agency. Cullis has been Chief of Staff to the First Partner in the Governor’s Office since 2021. She was Founder of Claire Cullis Consulting, LLC from 2018 to 2021. Cullis was the Executive Director of the Institute for Democracy and Justice from 2018 to 2021. She was the Director of Dignitary and Speaker Engagement at the Global Climate Action Summit for the United Nations Foundation in 2018. Cullis was a Consultant to the Special Olympics for the Austria Winter World Games in 2017. She held multiple positions at the United States Department of the Treasury from 2013 to 2017, including Director of Scheduling, Advance, and Administration, and Associate Director of Scheduling and Advance for the Treasury Secretary. Cullis was an Advance Associate at The White House from 2013 to 2017. She was Deputy Parade Director at the Presidential Inaugural Committee from 2012 to 2013. Cullis was National Advance Staff for Obama for America in 2012. She was a Senior Associate at the Dewey Square Group from 2006 to 2012. She was a Teacher at the Japanese Exchange and Teaching Program from 2005 to 2006. Cullis was National Advance Staff for the John Kerry presidential campaign in 2004. Cullis earned her Master of Business Administration degree from Virginia Tech, and her Bachelor of the Arts degree in International Studies and Studio Art from the University of Iowa. This position does not require Senate confirmation, and the compensation is $195,564. Cullis is a Democrat.

    Sophia Carrillo, of Santa Monica, has been appointed Assistant General Counsel of Enforcement at the California Environmental Protection Agency. Carrillo was an Assistant United States Attorney at the United States Attorney’s Office, Central District of California from 2023 to 2025. She was a Deputy Attorney General at the California Department of Justice from 2019 to 2023. Carrillo was a Judicial Law Clerk at the United States District Court, Eastern District of California from 2018 to 2019. She was an Associate Director of the Mayor’s Office of Talent and Appointments/D.C. Human Resources at the Executive Office of Mayor Muriel Bowser in 2015. Carrillo is a member of the Latino Community Foundation’s Los Angeles Giving Circle. She earned her Juris Doctor degree from Stanford Law School and a Bachelor of the Arts degree in Political Science and Sociology from the University of San Diego. This position does not require Senate confirmation and compensation is $174,000. Carrillo is a Democrat. 

    Iris “Marlene” De La O, of Berkeley, has been appointed Deputy Secretary of Public Policy at the California Environmental Protection Agency. De La O held several positions at Chemonics International from 2021 to 2025, including Senior Partnerships Manager and Director of Climate Change and Resiliency. She was the Director of Resiliency and Acquisitions at the Department of Housing, Preservation, and Development in 2019. De La O was Deputy Director at the California Strategic Growth Council from 2017 to 2018. She was a Consultant at Inter-American Development Bank from 2015 to 2016. De La O was a Manager and Regional Contracts Specialist at Chemonics International from 2012 to 2015. She earned a Master of Public Policy degree in City Planning from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and a Bachelor of the Arts degree in Development Studies from the University of California, Berkeley. This position does not require Senate confirmation, and compensation is $175,512. De La O is a Democrat.

    Adam Ebrahim, of Carmichael, has been appointed Chief Deputy Director at the Commission on Teacher Credentialing. Ebrahim has been the Senior Director of Policy and Continuous Improvement at the Commission on Teacher Credentialing since 2024. He was the Principal Consultant at Azimuth Learning Partners from 2016 to 2024. Ebrahim was the Director of Education Strategy at Parsec Education in 2024. He was a Staff Consultant at the California Teachers Association from 2020 to 2024. Ebrahim was the Director of Local Control and Accountability Plan and Continuous Improvement at San Juan Unified School District from 2019 to 2020. He was a Project Director at Californians Dedicated to Education Foundation from 2016 to 2019. Ebrahim was a Staff Consultant at Fresno County Superintendent of Schools from 2015 to 2016. He was a Teacher at Fresno Unified School District from 2010 to 2015. Ebrahim was an Enlisted Soldier and Commissioned Officer at the California Army National Guard from 2007 to 2012. He received his Master of Education degree in United States Education in a Global Context from National University, a Master of Arts degree in International Affairs from Washington University in Saint Louis, and a Bachelor of Arts degree in Political Science from University of California, Berkeley. This position does not require Senate confirmation, and the compensation is $181,344. Ebrahim is a Democrat.

    Vanessa Ejike, of Cerritos, has been appointed to the State Board of Education. Ejike was a Poll Worker for the Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk and an Intern for Assemblymember Sharon Quirk-Silva in the California State Assembly in 2024. She is the National Partnerships Director for the High School Democrats of America, Local Affairs Director for California High School Democrats, Communications Coordinator for the Pacific Coast Coalition of Girl Up USA, Student Representative for the Legislative and Policy Committee at the ABC Unified School District, and Founder and Chair of the Principal’s Advisory Council at Gretchen Whitney High School. This position does not require Senate confirmation, and the compensation is $100 per diem. Ejike is not registered to vote. 

    Niki Woodard, of Sacramento, has been appointed Deputy Director of Communications and External Affairs at the California Energy Commission. Woodard has been the Senior Communications Officer at Resources Legacy Fund since 2019. She was the Deputy Assistant Director at the California Department of Water Resources from 2016 to 2019. Woodard was the Communications and Marketing Director at the Center for Climate Protection from 2015 to 2016. She was Founder and Principal of Spiral-PR from 2011 to 2016. Woodard was the Communications Director at Sequoia Riverlands Trust from 2008 to 2011. She was a Research Associate at the Pew Research Center from 2006 to 2008. Woodard earned a Master of the Arts degree in Communications from Georgetown University and a Bachelor of the Arts degrees in Rhetoric and Economics from the University of California, Berkeley. This position does not require Senate confirmation, and compensation is $160,968. Woodard is a Democrat.

    Lee Herrick, of Fresno, has been reappointed California’s Poet Laureate, where he has served since 2022. Herrick has been an English Professor at Fresno City college since 1997 and an Adjunct Professor at the University of Nevada, Reno at Lake Tahoe since 2012. He was the Poet Laureate of the City of Fresno from 2015 to 2017. Herrick was an Adjunct English Professor at Modesto Junior College from 1995 to 1997. He is the Founder of LitHop and an Advisory Board Member of Terrain.org, Sixteen Rivers Press, and Anacapa review, and a Member of the Association of Writers and Writing Programs. Herrick earned a Master of Arts degree in English, Composition and Rhetoric and a Bachelor of Arts degree in English and American Literature from California State University, Stanislaus. This position requires Senate confirmation, and the California Arts Council provides an annual stipend. Herrick is a Democrat.

    Press Releases, Recent News

    Recent news

    News What you need to know: The Governor and First Partner marked Earth Day at Chico State University with students from the Center for Regenerative Agriculture and Resilient Systems. CHICO –  Governor Gavin Newsom and First Partner Jennifer Siebel Newsom celebrated…

    News What you need to know: Classes resumed in person at Palisades Charter High School today at a new temporary site in Santa Monica. All eight public schools that were damaged in the fires are now back to learning in person. LOS ANGELES – Today, Governor Gavin Newsom…

    News What you need to know: The Cradle-to-Career Data System displays key milestones in students’ experience over time and provides insights about education and career pathways. Sacramento, California – Today, Governor Gavin Newsom unveiled a first-of-its-kind…

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: PHOTOS: Governor Newsom, First Partner Siebel Newsom celebrate Earth Day with next generation of agricultural stewards

    Source: US State of California 2

    Apr 22, 2025

    What you need to know: The Governor and First Partner marked Earth Day at Chico State University with students from the Center for Regenerative Agriculture and Resilient Systems.

    CHICO –  Governor Gavin Newsom and First Partner Jennifer Siebel Newsom celebrated Earth Day today at California State University, Chico’s Center for Regenerative Agriculture and Resilient Systems. 

    The event showcased the role of higher education in preparing the next generation of California’s climate and agricultural stewards. The First Partner also highlighted the connection to the California Farm to School initiative, which has provided nearly half of California’s school-age students with school meals prepared using locally-grown ingredients, as well as educational programming about the origin and connection of their food to the sustainability of the planet.

    Innovative programs like the one here at Chico State are building the next generation of leaders — students learning how to farm in ways that protect the planet and build a more sustainable future. This is what climate action looks like — real investments today that will lead to a healthier, more sustainable tomorrow.

    Governor Gavin Newsom

    At Chico State, students are learning to be the environmental stewards of tomorrow, and through California Farm to School, we’re sparking that same interest at even earlier ages. By connecting young people across California to the land, their food, and the climate solutions we urgently need, we’re empowering the next generation to lead the way. To all the young people: we need you, we believe in you, and together, we will build a sustainable, resilient future.

    First Partner Jennifer Siebel Newsom

    Press Releases, Recent News

    Recent news

    News What you need to know: Classes resumed in person at Palisades Charter High School today at a new temporary site in Santa Monica. All eight public schools that were damaged in the fires are now back to learning in person. LOS ANGELES – Today, Governor Gavin Newsom…

    News What you need to know: The Cradle-to-Career Data System displays key milestones in students’ experience over time and provides insights about education and career pathways. Sacramento, California – Today, Governor Gavin Newsom unveiled a first-of-its-kind…

    News Sacramento, California – Governor Gavin Newsom today issued a proclamation declaring April 21, 2025 as “John Muir Day” in the State of California.The text of the proclamation is below: PROCLAMATIONJohn Muir, a Scottish immigrant, helped blaze a trail for…

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: With the support of Rosneft, the Sretensky Monastery Choir performed an anniversary concert in the Kremlin Palace

    Translartion. Region: Russians Fedetion –

    Source: Rosneft – Rosneft – An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.

    With the support of Rosneft, the anniversary concert of the Sretensky Monastery Choir “Russia is ours alone” was held in the State Kremlin Palace (Moscow). The performance was dedicated to the 30th anniversary of the musical group.

    Rosneft has been supporting the Sretensky Monastery Choir since 2015. During this time, the group has successfully held numerous concert tours. Among the productions of past years are “Unholy Saints”, “The Romanovs”, “Russia: Time, Forward!”, “Masterpieces of World Culture”, “Life”, “Songs of Our Parents”.

    At the anniversary concert, the choir performed unique examples of spiritual music, as well as beloved songs that captured the most important milestones in the history of our country. Among them are “Let’s Pray for Our Parents”, “Hope”, “I Love You, Life”, “Horse”, etc. In addition, other famous musicians and actors of our country, as well as the children’s choir of the “White Steamship” project, took part in the event. The anniversary concert was a sell-out, the audience applauded the musicians standing.

    This year, with the support of Rosneft, the Sretensky Monastery Choir presented a new musical production, Dedicated to the Great Victory, prepared for the 80th anniversary of the Victory in the Great Patriotic War. The new project is designed to preserve the memory of the heroic events. The program includes the best works from the front years. The production is based on real stories about the fates of the heroes who walked the miles of war from Moscow to Berlin. The program includes concerts in 24 cities in the regions where the Company operates. The tour will end on July 3 with a concert in Sochi.

    The Sretensky Monastery Choir is one of the most famous musical groups in Russia. It has a unique performing style that allows you to hear and feel music in a new way. The group has already visited more than 45 countries and performed at the most famous venues.

    Rosneft actively participates in significant projects of Russian cultural life aimed at the revival and preservation of spiritual and national values. Since 2018, the Company has supported the projects of the State Hermitage Museum. With the support of Rosneft, the museum opened an updated exhibition “Culture and Art of China”, and the Gallery of the Department of the Ancient World was restored. Also, since 2022, Rosneft has been the general sponsor of the children’s music festival “White Steamship”.

    With the Company’s support, the Mariinsky Theatre artists under the direction of Valery Gergiev performed in Qatar with the production of “A Thousand and One Nights”; a concert dedicated to the 95th anniversary of Alexandra Pakhmutova was held in Volgograd; several exhibitions were organized at the Jewish Museum and Tolerance Center in Moscow. In 2023-2024, with the support of Rosneft, Tatyana Navka’s ice shows “Evenings on a Farm” and “The Nutcracker” were held in Moscow, and the show “The Love Story of Scheherazade” toured in the Indian city of Ahmedabad.

    Department of Information and Advertising of PJSC NK Rosneft April 23, 2025

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: Tur procurement continues in major Tur producing states

    Source: Government of India

    Tur procurement continues in major Tur producing states

    Govt. committed to purchase 100 percent of production of Tur at MSP

    Tur procurement is also done on e-Samridhi and eSamyukti portals

    Posted On: 23 APR 2025 2:15PM by PIB Delhi

    In order to incentivize the farmers contributing for the enhancement of domestic production of pulses and to reduce the dependence on imports, the Government has approved the procurement of Tur, Urad and Masur under Price Support Scheme (PSS) equivalent to 100% of the production of the state for the procurement year 2024-25.

    The Government has also made an announcement in Budget 2025 that the procurement of Tur (Arhar), Urad and Masur would be undertaken 100% of the production of the State for another four years up to 2028-29 through Central Nodal Agencies namely NAFED and NCCF to achieve self- sufficiency in pulses in the country.

    Accordingly, Union Minister of Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare Shri Shivraj Singh Chouhan approved the procurement of Tur (Arhar) in the states of Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Haryana, Karnataka, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Telangana and Uttar Pradesh under Price Support Scheme during the Kharif 2024-25 season for a total quantity of 13.22 LMT. The Minister has also approved the extension of procurement period in Andhra Pradesh by 30 days beyond 90 days upto 22nd of next month in the interest of farmers.

    The procurement at MSP through NAFED and NCCF is in progress in Andhra Pradesh,Gujarat, Karnataka, Maharashtra and Telangana and a total quantity of 3.92 LMT of Tur (Arhar) has been procured in these states till 22nd of this month benefitting 2,56,517farmers of these states. Tur procurement is also done from pre-registered farmers on e-Samridhi portal of NAFED and eSamyukti portal of NCCF.  The Govt. of India is committed to take up 100 percent procurement of Tur @ MSP offered by farmers through central nodal agencies namely NAFED and NCCF.

    ******

    PSF/KSR/AR

    (Release ID: 2123761) Visitor Counter : 15

    Read this release in: Hindi

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-OSI: Check Point Software Reports 2025 First Quarter Financial Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    TEL AVIV, Israel, April 23, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Check Point® Software Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: CHKP), today announced its financial results for the quarter ended March 31st, 2025.

    First Quarter 2025 Financial Highlights:

    • Cash Flow from Operations: $421 million, a 17 percent increase year over year
    • Calculated Billings* reached $553 million, a 7 percent increase year over year
    • Remaining Performance Obligation (RPO)**: $2.4 billion, an 11 percent increase year over year
    • Total Revenues: $638 million, a 7 percent increase year over year
    • Products & Licenses Revenues: $114 million, a 14 percent increase year over year
    • Security Subscriptions Revenues: $291 million, a 10 percent increase year over year
    • GAAP Operating Income: $196 million, representing 31 percent of total revenues
    • Non-GAAP Operating Income: $259 million, representing 41 percent of total revenues
    • GAAP EPS: $1.71, a 7 percent increase year over year
    • Non-GAAP EPS: $2.21, a 9 percent increase year over year

    “The first quarter results have provided a solid foundation to expand upon as we progress through the year.  Strong demand for our Quantum Force appliances, fueled by refresh cycles and new projects delivered double-digit year-over-year growth in products and licenses revenues,” stated CEO Nadav Zafrir. “The AI-driven Infinity Platform, featuring a Hybrid Mesh Architecture, continues to resonate with customers and delivered another quarter of impressive double-digit year-over-year growth.”

    For information regarding the non-GAAP financial measures discussed in this release, as well as a reconciliation of such non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures, please see below “Use of Non-GAAP Financial Information” and “Reconciliation of GAAP to Non-GAAP Financial Information.”

    Conference Call & Video Cast Information
    Check Point will host a conference call with the investment community on April 23, 2025, at 8:30 AM ET/5:30 AM PT. To listen to the live videocast or replay, please visit the website www.checkpoint.com/ir.

    Second Quarter 2025 Investor Conference Participation Schedule

    • Barclays Americas Select Franchise Conference 2025
      May 6, 2025, London, UK – Fireside Chat & 1×1’s
    • J.P. Morgan 53rd Annual Technology, Media, and Telecom Conference
      May 13-15, 2025, Boston, MA – Fireside Chat & 1×1’s
    • Oppenheimer 26th Annual Israeli Conference
      May 18, 2025, Tel Aviv, Israel – Fireside Chat & 1×1’s
    • TD Cowen 53rd Annual TMT Conference
      May 28, 2025, NY, NY – Fireside Chat & 1×1’s
    • Jefferies Software Summit
      May 29, 2025, Newport Coast, CA – Fireside Chat &1×1’s
    • Stifel 2025 Cross Sector 1×1 Conference
      June 3, 2025, Boston, MA – 1×1’s
    • Baird 2025 Global Consumer, Technology & Services Conference
      June 4, 2025, SF, CA – 1×1’s
    • Bank of America Merrill Lynch 2025 Global Technology Conference
      June 5, 2025, SF, CA – Fireside Chat & 1×1’s
    • TD Cowen 2nd Annual Corporate Access Day
      June 17, 2025, Toronto, Canada – 1×1’s

    Members of Check Point’s management team are expected to present at these conferences and discuss the latest company strategies and initiatives. Check Point’s conference presentations are expected to be available via webcast on the company’s web site. To hear these presentations and access the most updated information please visit the company’s web site at www.checkpoint.com/ir. The schedule is subject to change.

    Follow Check Point via:
    Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/checkpointsw
    Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/checkpointsoftware
    Blog: http://blog.checkpoint.com
    YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/user/CPGlobal
    LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/check-point-software-technologies

    About Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
    Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. (http://www.checkpoint.com) is a leading AI-powered, cloud-delivered cyber security platform provider protecting over 100,000 organizations worldwide. Check Point leverages the power of AI everywhere to enhance cyber security efficiency and accuracy through its Infinity Platform, with industry-leading catch rates enabling proactive threat anticipation and smarter, faster response times. The comprehensive platform includes cloud-delivered technologies consisting of Check Point Harmony to secure the workspace, Check Point CloudGuard to secure the cloud, Check Point Quantum to secure the network, and Check Point Infinity Core Services for collaborative security operations and services.

    Legal Notice Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
    This press release contains forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements generally relate to future events or our future financial or operating performance. Forward-looking statements in this press release include, but are not limited to, expectations regarding our products and solutions, and our participation in investor conferences and other events during the second quarter of 2025. Our expectations and beliefs regarding these matters may not materialize, and actual results or events in the future are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those projected. These risks include our ability to continue to develop platform capabilities and solutions; customer acceptance and purchase of our existing solutions and new solutions; the market for IT security continuing to develop; competition from other products and services; appointments and departures of our executive officers; and general market, political, economic, and business conditions, including acts of terrorism or war. The forward-looking statements contained in this press release are also subject to other risks and uncertainties, including those more fully described in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including our Annual Report on Form 20-F filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 17, 2025. The forward-looking statements in this press release are based on information available to Check Point as of the date hereof, and Check Point disclaims any obligation to update any forward-looking statements, except as required by law.

    Use of Non-GAAP Financial Information
    In addition to reporting financial results in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, Check Point uses non-GAAP measures of operating income, net income and earnings per diluted share, which are adjustments from results based on GAAP to exclude, as applicable, stock-based compensation expenses, amortization of intangible assets and acquisition related expenses and the related tax affects. Check Point’s management believes the non-GAAP financial information provided in this release is useful to investors’ understanding and assessment of Check Point’s ongoing core operations and prospects for the future. Historically, Check Point has also publicly presented these supplemental non-GAAP financial measures to assist the investment community to see the company “through the eyes of management,” and thereby enhance understanding of its operating performance. The presentation of this non-GAAP financial information is not intended to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for results prepared in accordance with GAAP. A reconciliation of the non-GAAP financial measures discussed in this press release to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures is included with the financial statements contained in this press release. Management uses both GAAP and non-GAAP information in evaluating and operating business internally and as such has determined that it is important to provide this information to investors.

    * Calculated Billings is a measure that we defined as total revenues recognized in accordance with GAAP plus the change in Total Deferred Revenues during the period.

    ** Remaining Performance Obligation (RPO) is a measure that represents the total value of non-cancellable contracted products and/or services that are yet to be recognized as Revenue as of March 31, 2025.

    CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
     
    (Unaudited, in millions, except per share amounts)
     
      Three Months Ended
      March 31,
      2025   2024
    Revenues:      
    Products and licenses $ 114.1   $ 100.3
    Security subscriptions   290.6     263.4
    Total revenues from products and security subscriptions   404.7     363.7
    Software updates, maintenance and services   233.1     235.1
    Total revenues   637.8     598.8
           
    Operating expenses:      
    Cost of products and licenses   23.0     19.9
    Cost of security subscriptions   21.4     16.5
    Total cost of products and security subscriptions   44.4     36.4
    Cost of Software updates and maintenance   32.1     28.7
    Amortization of technology   7.6     5.8
    Total cost of revenues   84.1     70.9
           
    Research and development   102.1     99.2
    Selling and marketing   225.4     206.2
    General and administrative   30.7     28.6
    Total operating expenses   442.3     404.9
           
    Operating income   195.5     193.9
    Financial income, net   27.3     22.6
    Income before taxes on income   222.8     216.5
    Taxes on income   31.9     32.6
    Net income $ 190.9   $ 183.9
    Basic earnings per share $ 1.77   $ 1.64
    Number of shares used in computing basic earnings per share   107.9     112.3
    Diluted earnings per share $ 1.71   $ 1.60
    Number of shares used in computing diluted earnings per share   111.4     115.2
    CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
    SELECTED FINANCIAL METRICS
     
    (Unaudited, in millions, except per share amounts)
     
        Three Months Ended
        March 31,
        2025   2024
             
    Revenues   $ 637.8   $ 598.8
    Non-GAAP operating income     258.6     252.0
    Non-GAAP net income     246.2     234.5
    Non-GAAP diluted earnings per share   $ 2.21   $ 2.04
    Number of shares used in computing diluted Non-GAAP earnings per share     111.4     115.2
    CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
    RECONCILIATION OF GAAP TO NON-GAAP FINANCIAL INFORMATION
     
    (Unaudited, in millions, except per share amounts)
     
        Three Months Ended
        March 31,
          2025       2024  
             
    GAAP operating income   $ 195.5     $ 193.9  
    Stock-based compensation (1)     41.2       41.6  
    Amortization of intangible assets and acquisition related expenses (2) (*)     21.9       16.5  
    Non-GAAP operating income   $ 258.6     $ 252.0  
             
    GAAP net income   $ 190.9     $ 183.9  
    Stock-based compensation (1)     41.2       41.6  
    Amortization of intangible assets and acquisition related expenses (2) (*)     21.9       16.5  
    Taxes on the above items (3)     (7.8 )     (7.5 )
    Non-GAAP net income   $ 246.2     $ 234.5  
             
    GAAP diluted earnings per share   $ 1.71     $ 1.60  
    Stock-based compensation (1)     0.37       0.36  
    Amortization of intangible assets and acquisition related expenses (2) (*)     0.2       0.15  
    Taxes on the above items (3)     (0.07 )     (0.07 )
    Non-GAAP diluted earnings per share   $ 2.21     $ 2.04  
             
    Number of shares used in computing diluted Non-GAAP earnings per share     111.4       115.2  
             
    (1) Stock-based compensation:        
    Cost of products and licenses   $ 0.1     $ 0.1  
    Cost of software updates and maintenance     2.1       2.2  
    Research and development     14.7       14.7  
    Selling and marketing     14.6       15.9  
    General and administrative     9.7       8.7  
          41.2       41.6  
             
    (2) Amortization of intangible assets and acquisition related expenses (*):        
    Amortization of technology-cost of revenues     7.6       5.8  
    Research and development     1.5       1.6  
    Selling and marketing     12.8       9.1  
          21.9       16.5  

    (3) Taxes on the above items

        (7.8 )     (7.5 )
    Total, net   $ 55.3     $ 50.6  
     

    (*) While amortization of acquired intangible assets is excluded from the measures, the revenue of the acquired companies is reflected in the measures and the acquired assets contribute to revenue generation.

    CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
    CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET DATA

    (In millions)

    ASSETS

     
          March 31,   December 31,
          2025
    (Unaudited)
      2024
    (Audited)
    Current assets:          
    Cash and cash equivalents     $ 450.2   $ 506.2
    Marketable securities and short-term deposits       1,012.0     865.7
    Trade receivables, net       399.7     728.8
    Prepaid expenses and other current assets       94.5     92.7
    Total current assets       1,956.4     2,193.4
               
    Long-term assets:          
    Marketable securities       1,469.8     1,411.9
    Property and equipment, net       83.0     80.8
    Deferred tax asset, net       80.6     74.7
    Goodwill and other intangible assets, net       1,877.9     1,897.1
    Other assets       90.2     96.6
    Total long-term assets       3,601.5     3,561.1
               
    Total assets     $ 5,557.9   $ 5,754.5
    LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
     
    Current liabilities:          
    Deferred revenues     $ 1,389.8     $ 1,471.3  
    Trade payables and other accrued liabilities       394.8       472.9  
    Total current liabilities       1,784.6       1,944.2  
               
    Long-term liabilities:          
    Long-term deferred revenues       525.6       529.0  
    Income tax accrual       467.4       459.6  
    Other long-term liabilities       31.8       32.3  
    Total long-term liabilities       1,024.8       1,020.9  
               
    Total liabilities       2,809.4       2,965.1  
               
    Shareholders’ equity:          
    Share capital       0.8       0.8  
    Additional paid-in capital       3,125.5       3,049.5  
    Treasury shares at cost       (14,579.6 )     (14,264.4 )
    Accumulated other comprehensive gain       (2.9 )     (10.3 )
    Retained earnings       14,204.7       14,013.8  
    Total shareholders’ equity       2,748.5       2,789.4  
    Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity     $ 5,557.9     $ 5,754.5  
    Total cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities, and short-term deposits     $ 2,932.0     $ 2,783.8  
    CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
    SELECTED CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOW DATA
     
    (Unaudited, in millions)
     
      Three Months Ended
      March 31,
        2025       2024  
    Cash flow from operating activities:      
    Net income $ 190.9     $ 183.9  
    Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:      
    Depreciation of property and equipment   5.2       7.3  
    Amortization of intangible assets   19.2       13.5  
    Stock-based compensation   41.2       41.6  
    Realized loss on marketable securities   0.1        
    Decrease in trade and other receivables, net   329.4       265.4  
    Decrease in deferred revenues, trade payables and other accrued liabilities   (142.1 )     (140.6 )
    Deferred income taxes, net   (22.8 )     (10.1 )
    Net cash provided by operating activities   421.1       361.0  
           
    Cash flow from investing activities:      
    Investment in property and equipment   (7.4 )     (6.5 )
    Net cash used in investing activities   (7.4 )     (6.5 )
           
    Cash flow from financing activities:      
    Proceeds from issuance of shares upon exercise of options   46.0       45.6  
    Purchase of treasury shares   (325.0 )     (325.0 )
    Payments related to shares withheld for taxes   (1.5 )     (1.1 )
    Net cash used in financing activities   (280.5 )     (280.5 )
           
    Unrealized gain on marketable securities, net   15.0       1.6  
           
    Increase in cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities, and short-term deposits   148.2       75.6  
           
    Cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities, and short-term deposits at the beginning of the period   2,783.8       2,959.7  
           
    Cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities, and short-term deposits at the end of the period $ 2,932.0     $ 3,035.3  

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Filmmakers’ Forum and Actors’ Master Classes: How the Weekend Went at the Moskino Cinema Park

    Translartion. Region: Russians Fedetion –

    Source: Moscow Government – Government of Moscow –

    Last weekend, April 19 and 20, the Moskino Cinema Park hosted a filmmakers’ forum dedicated to the use of modern technologies in film production. Industry experts spoke at the forum. In addition, it was possible to take part in acting master classes and the quest “Film! Film! Film!”, as well as see the one-man show “Dog”.

    Lectures, master classes and creative evenings

    The first lecture was given by Broadcast’s Product Director Leonid Novoselov. He spoke about real-time filming technology, 3D graphics and innovative programs for implementing creative ideas. The lecture helped students of specialized universities learn a lot of new things.

    The master class by Natalia Klibanova, chief producer of the film company Amedia Production, was devoted to the topic of complex staging of filming. She worked on such projects as The Master and Margarita, Palma-2 and Psychologists. She shared stories from her own professional experience with the student filmmakers.

    “It is very nice that there are people who come to my lectures at the cinema park more than once. In general, the audience is very interested, these are either those who want to learn more about cinema or those who want to integrate into the industry. Actors who want to expand their professional opportunities often come to the lectures. And we always invite them to castings, tell them about projects. This certainly gives results. There are also those who want to reformat their activities, while remaining in cinema. For example, they were involved in advertising, but dream of moving towards TV series. We talk about the work of our company, about who we are looking for, offer internships for students. The most important thing is not to be afraid to participate in pitching, festivals, educational programs that the Moskino cinema park organizes. It is incredibly valuable that forums, lectures and master classes for aspiring filmmakers are held here,” said Natalia Klibanova.

    The artistic part of film production was the subject of a lecture by Alexandrina Trapeznikova, a teacher at the Institute of Cinema and Television (GITR). The production designer spoke about how the tools of professionals in this field have changed thanks to the advent of computer technology, as well as about drawing skills and new tasks. At a panel discussion, filmmakers Natalia Klibanova, Alexandra Trapeznikova and Leonid Novoselov discussed the latest trends in the industry, the future of cinematography and answered questions from the audience.

    The Gonzaga Theatre set hosted a creative evening with actor Lev Zulkarnaev, a participant in the projects “The Word of a Boy” and “Buratino”. The graduate of the Russian Institute of Theatre Arts – GITIS, spoke about the acting profession and interaction with the director. Many young fans gathered for his performance, took photos with the artist, asked questions and received autographs.

    “I think that such meetings are important, but only in combination with my own experience. Because in theory everything sounds one way, but in practice it is completely different. It is important that those who want to get into cinema definitely try, get their hand in, maybe make mistakes and learn from them. The Cinema Park is a professional space with good organization, where I felt very comfortable working. I starred here in the film “Buratino” on the “Provincial Towns of Europe” set, and I only have positive impressions. I have never seen such amazing scenery. I hope that I will definitely work on the Cinema Park sets again,” shared Lev Zulkarnayev.

    In addition, a master class and lecture on acting were held by the actor of the Stanislavsky Electrotheatre Nikita Makhalov and the director of the Theatre of Young Muscovites Andrey Zadubrovsky. Nikita Makhalov demonstrated professional techniques for conveying the emotional state of the hero. Andrey Zadubrovsky told the audience about the means of expressiveness of speech and plasticity, and also revealed the secret of how to play a role while remaining yourself.

    Performances, quests and film screenings

    At the Gonzaga Theatre, children and parents watched Alexey Poltavsky’s one-man show “Dog” based on the story of the same name by Georgian writer Nodar Dumbadze. The story about the struggle between good and evil, a teenager’s difficult choice and love for an abandoned animal evoked genuine feelings in the audience.

    The immersive quest “Film! Film! Film!” was held at the Uyezdny Gorod location. The participants had to go through the entire film production process – from creating a script to releasing the film, and they were helped in this by episodes played out by professional actors. In the process of creating a cinematic masterpiece, the participants were inspired by realistic decorations of suburban streets and buildings.

    Unforgettable impressions of the weekend were left by watching films for the whole family at the Moskino Kinopark cinema. Adventure lovers remembered the new Russian film Kraken. The film tells about the search for a missile submarine cruiser that disappeared during a secret mission in the Greenland Sea. In addition, viewers saw kind films about family, friendship and loyalty Batya-2. Ded and Palma-2. And the cartoon Jurassic Jungle was especially memorable for the young guests of the cinema park.

    Sobyanin told how virtual technologies simplify film shooting in MoscowThe 47th Moscow International Film Festival opened with the historical war drama “Not on the Lists”

    The Moskino cinema park is part of Sergei Sobyanin’s “Moscow – City of Cinema” project and an object of the Moscow cinema cluster, which is being developed by the capital Department of CultureThe first stage of development has already been completed here: 24 natural sites, four pavilions and six infrastructure facilities have been built, including the sets “Center of Moscow”, “Moscow in the 1940s”, “Vitebsk Station”, “Yurovo Airport”, “Cathedral Square of Moscow”, “Deaf Village”, “County Town”, “Cowboy Town”, “St. Petersburg Bar” and others.

    The Moscow Film Cluster is an infrastructure facility, services and facilities for filmmakers, which are being developed by the Moscow Government within the framework of the Moscow — City of Cinema project. Its structure includes the Moskino film park, the Gorky Film Studio (sites on Sergei Eisenstein Street and Valdaisky Proyezd), the Moskino film factory, the Moskino cinema chain, the film commission and the Moskino film platform.

    Get the latest news quickly in the official telegram channel the city of Moscow.

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    Please Note; This Information is Raw Content Directly from the Information Source. It is access to What the Source Is Stating and Does Not Reflect

    https: //vv.mos.ru/nevs/ite/153022073/

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Speech to Nelson Tasman Chamber of Commerce

    Source: New Zealand Government

    Tēnā koutou katoa. Nga mihi ki nga manawhenua o tenie rohe  me nga waka katoa ki tae mai nei.

    Good afternoon everyone.

    Thank you for the opportunity to be here today.

    I want to acknowledge the work the Nelson Tasman Chamber of Commerce does. 

    And I want to acknowledge the Nelson Tasman business community. You are at the heart of your communities, creating jobs, generating income for locals and producing a diverse range of goods and services.

    I always enjoy visiting Nelson and have enjoyed many visits here since becoming an MP.  Your local Mayor and Former MP Nick Smith has made sure of that!  

    But my first iconic Nelson-Tasman experience was not in fact a  Nick Smith related one. 

    I have especially fond memories of kayaking and hiking through the Abel Tasman National Park around 20 years ago with my then boyfriend – now husband – and being dazzled by its majesty, complete with frolicking baby seals, enthusiastic trampers playing 500 in the huts. A Thai green curry and cold beer providing a grand finale at what I think must have been the Park Café Mārahau. 

    My personally memorable experience is not unique. 

    The Nelson Tasman region is a really special part of New Zealand. That’s demonstrated by the number of people who choose to visit here – from around the country and the world, and the number of migrants who choose to move here and make this place home. 

    Like many other areas of the country, the communities of this region are facing both exciting economic opportunities and a range of economic challenges.  

    On the one hand there is so much to feel optimistic about, from your thriving and diverse food and beverage sector, the growing and potential-filled blue economy, your leadership in forestry and wood product manufacturing, and your growing visitor economy, all of which sustain jobs and incomes today and have the ability to deliver even more in future.  

    These growing industries are good news for the future of people here, and, beyond that, will help New Zealand earn the additional revenue we need to fund great health care, education services and physical infrastructure. Like the Hope Bypass, upgrades to Nelson Hospital and repairs to local schools.  

    I’ve had the pleasure today of visiting some of the people leading in these sectors: I spent time at the Cawthron Aquaculture Park and felt excited by their vision for driving forward the Government’s goal of quadrupling the size of the aquaculture sector over the next decade.

    I visited Trinder Engineering and was wowed by their commitment to research, innovation and a positive workplace culture.

    And I visited Pic’s Peanut Butter:  whose story began with a product made in a concrete mixer winning over die-hard fans at the Nelson Farmer’s Market and has now expanded to produce 25,000 jars a day for peanut butter lovers the world over.

    There are good news stories like this across New Zealand, and I think we should all do more to celebrate our great Kiwi success stories.  

    These successes came about because of clever, brave people who decided to take a risk, to take a loan to invest in big ideas, to work hard to make things happen, to hire good people and offer them meaningful careers, to pursue a vision and keep going in the face of adversity.  

    In doing so, these enterprises, and the hundreds like them across Nelson and New Zealand, have supported thousands of people into good jobs, providing income for their families and investments for their communities.  

    They’ve also paid a lot of tax along the way – which has allowed the Government to increase its annual investments in schools, health services, superannuation support, and other essential public services.  

    That contribution by business and hard working taxpayers too often goes unacknowledged:  We all have hopes for new investments and better services, but before we dream up new ways of spending, we first need to collectively earn the dollars required to sustainably fund that spending. 

    Growing regional economies, and successful local businesses are vital to that equation.  Put simply: To deliver the kind of country we all want – with better living standards, better opportunities for our kids and more financially secure families, Nelson and New Zealand needs more success stories like Cawthorn, Trinder and Pic’s.  

    That’s why our Government is so focused on delivering policies that support economic productivity and that give entrepreneurs, employers and firms the confidence they need to invest, hire, expand and grow.  

    That includes getting the basics right, such as low and stable inflation, manageable interest rates and credible fiscal management.  

    It means ensuring the Government doesn’t make it harder to do business by tying people up in red tape, endless consent processes, or sticking rigidly to rules that simply don’t make sense. 

    These sensible policy approaches are the base from which we will deliver better choices and investments in the years ahead.  

    I have enormous optimism in New Zealand’s economic growth potential.  

    We are a safe, secure country with established trading relationships and a global reputation as a good place to do business.  

    We are blessed with abundant natural resources – everything from ocean to freshwater, fertile land to minerals and temperate weather.  

    In a world worried about food security, we feed more than 40 million people with levels of efficiency and sustainability that are the envy of the world.  

    We have a long history of stable democracy, strong institutions and rule of law.  

    We’ve produced world-leading scientific breakthroughs, send rockets to space and continue to produce some of the world’s best digital effects.

    There are many reasons for New Zealand to be optimistic that better times are ahead.  

    Even so, I’m not a total Pollyanna.  

    I’m conscious of the challenging economic circumstances many people in Nelson, and around the country for that matter, have experienced in the past few years and in some cases continue to experience.  

    Local employers and households have come through a post-Covid period of very high inflation and rapidly rising interest rates. 

    High inflation and high interest rates aren’t just numbers for economists – they’ve had big human impacts:  elevating the cost of living, and putting a handbrake on business activity, with significant impacts for people’s jobs and incomes.  

    Our country has also been left with a sea of debt and red-ink in the Government books that will take time to repair.  

    The post-Covid ‘structural deficit’ has left a big gap between what the country needs to fund to deliver on the spending commitments we’ve made and what we need to earn to pay for that spending. 

    In effect, the Government is borrowing billions to bridge the gap, with a $13 billion deficit this year and forecasters anticipating deficits in future years too.  

    That obviously can’t go on forever, or else our kids and grandkids will be left with unsustainable debt and considerable economic uncertainty.  

    That’s why our Government is working carefully to bring the country’s finances back into balance: so we can start to pay down our debt and create better buffers for the future.  

    We want to ensure New Zealand is financially strong and resilient enough to effectively respond to whatever the future may throw at us: be it earthquakes, extreme climatic events or other events outside our control. 

    Restoring that fiscal balance, while continuing to increase investment in essential front line public services, requires careful prioritisation and some tough – but unavoidable –  choices.

    Believe me – I too would love the freedom to throw today’s Budget constraints out the door – but I’m always conscious that the dollars we spend today eventually need to be repaid.  Freedom today could mean serfdom tomorrow.

    The good news is that New Zealand has in recent months been turning the corner in our post-Covid recovery.  

    Inflation has been brought back under control, interest rates have dropped 200 basis points, exports have been growing, commodity prices have improved, tourists have been returning and business and consumer confidence has been on the up.  

    That growth is positive for Kiwis’ jobs and incomes and for the Government’s books.  It provided a welcome backdrop as the Government started putting together this year’s Budget.  

    But, there’s a but. As you know, the world economy is now facing further headwinds, with United States trade policy changes, counter-tariffs, retaliatory measures, tariff pauses and still unfolding estimates of what this could all mean for global and regional growth.  

    Uncertainty abounds.

    The impacts for New Zealand are twofold.  

    On the one hand, there is the first-order impact for our exporters who now face the prospect of higher tariffs being charged for them to export their goods to the US.  

    I know many exporters are finding it very difficult to see through the noise and plan for what might lie around the corner for them.  

    I think for example of the wine exporters of the Nelson-Marlborough region, who are nervous about the many implications different tariff regimes could have for their existing customers and for the way wine is traded around the world.  Will they be competing with more European wine in the UK?  Will they be better placed in a relative sense in the US?  

    It’s simply too soon for wine exporters to know and this makes it very difficult for them to plan.  

    Direct tariff impacts may well be uneven from firm to firm, sector to sector and market to market.  

    There will inevitably be both swings and roundabouts. For example, I spoke to a beverage manufacturer in Wellington last week who’d just taken a large order from China, as importers there were looking to find alternatives to US products which they expect will carry much higher tariffs into the future.  

    The Government has moved swiftly to gather the best possible information and insights about these unfolding implications for our exporters, relying on our incredible network of diplomats and representatives around the world.  

    Officials are addressing queries from exporters, have hotlines established, are delivering information webinars and are working with individual firms to help them understand the practical implications of tariffs, including for firms who have manufacturing in third countries or product already en-route to the US.  

    New Zealand Trade and Enterprise is currently providing tailored support to a group of 1000 larger exporters, including access to their in-market staff, their network of private sector exporters and financial advice.    

    For now, most business appear to be looking to navigate through the initial uncertainty rather than making dramatic changes in response.

    The Government will keep providing exporters with information and advisory support and assess impacts as more certain information becomes available.

    Beyond direct tariff effects, the second-order impact for the New Zealand economy is what forecasters are now predicting will be more financial uncertainty, potentially increased inflation pressure and a lower growth trajectory for the global economy and many of the countries with which New Zealand trades.  

    These are just forecasts at this stage, and, once again the actual impacts are still unclear.  Put simply though: all these developments will make New Zealand’s economic recovery harder.  

    We can’t wish that away.  

    What we can do is focus on the things we can control.  

    This means it is more important than ever that New Zealand offers a predictable, steady approach to our economic and fiscal management.  

    In an unstable world we need to stay the course with responsible policies that provide stability, support investment and make us an attractive place for the world to trade and do business with.  

    New Zealand has the opportunity to position ourselves as a safe haven, and to continue our long history of honouring existing trade agreements and forging new ones.  

    Earlier this year, well before “Liberation Day”, I released the Government’s Going for Growth framework which sets out 88 policy actions to do just that.  These actions are grouped under the Government’s five key thematic growth pillars.  

    Promoting global trade and investment was a key pillar then and it’s a key pillar now.  

    Our goal is to double the value of New Zealand exports within a decade so we are working to grow and strengthen our trade relationships around the world. 

    The Prime Minister kicked off the year in Dubai signing a new trade agreement with the United Arab Emirates and trade talks with India, soon to be the world’s third largest economy, are underway.

    At the same time, we are making it much easier for New Zealand to benefit from international capital and investment. 

    A new agency, Invest NZ, is being established to welcome international investment into New Zealand, and the Overseas Investment Act is being reformed to make it easier for businesses to receive new investment, grow and pay higher wages.  

    There are four additional pillars in the Government’s Going for Growth agenda:

    • Developing talent
    • Competitive business settings
    • Innovation, technology and science; and
    • Infrastructure for growth

    I encourage you to check out the full plan online but let me make just a few remarks about each.  

    Developing talent:  This is about making the most of our most important asset, human capital, getting back to basics and arresting the woeful decline in the literacy and numeracy skills of our school leavers. 

     We simply can’t be the wealthy country we want to be if too many of our school leavers emerge from the school system without the basic skills they need to succeed in the modern world. 

    We’ve already acted to stop the slide and re-introduced structured literacy and maths to our schools, ensuring kids are receiving instruction in ways that work.  We’re bringing practical knowledge and skills back to the curriculum and reporting on performance. 

    At the same time, we’re tuning-up our vocational education system to make it more responsive to industry and regional needs, and to ensure people wanting to acquire skills for a new trade or industry have good choices for upskilling. This means ensuring institutions like the Nelson Marlborough Institute of Technology can be locally nimble and responsive.  

    Competitive business settings:  This is about both cutting red tape and ensuring we have rules that foster competition between big firms to deliver a better deal for New Zealand consumers. 

    In my view, in recent years New Zealand has in too many areas of life become stultifyingly risk-averse, and we now have a spaghetti of costly and complex rules and regulations that are holding back sensible development and clever ideas.  

    The Government has already zeroed in on a key target in this regard: the Resource Management Act.  

    We’ve passed a new fast-track law to bypass the burdensome court process and accelerate the yes for dozens of major projects that, if approved through a streamlined panel process, will drive jobs and growth across the country.  

    In this region, three projects have been identified as potential fast-track initiatives.  

    They include the Hope Bypass, already confirmed as a Road of National Significance in our land transport plan, with a proposal to alter the existing designation and acquire additional land outside that designation. 

    They also include the Maitahi Village housing development, including plans for a commercial centre and retirement village.  I’m advised that this project is already being progressed through the fast-track panel process, with final decisions still pending.  

    The Mapua Housing Development, is also listed as a fast-track project with potential to enter the process. I’m advised that project would include up to 320 residential allotments, a recreational reserve, a community amenities building and parking, a wetland and restoration of the Season Valley stream.   

    Beyond the fast-track process we are also working at pace 

    to replace the Resource Management Act as a whole.  

    We’re advised our plans will deliver a 45 per cent reduction in administrative and compliance costs. 

    We’ve also worked quickly to lessen the regulatory burden on the agricultural sector. We back farmers, and we don’t want unwieldy rules stopping them making sensible decisions for their farming businesses.

    Reform of the Health and Safety at Work Act is underway to reduce box ticking exercises and compliance costs. 

    The other aspect of this work is in the competition space. 

    Everyday Kiwis, visiting OECD economists and Ministers around our Cabinet table share concerns about the concentration of large businesses in some of our major industries, with mounting evidence that competition has suffered as a result, and that New Zealand consumers are missing out on a fair deal.

    You’ll probably have noticed that we’re acting to improve competition in the banking and grocery sectors and we’ll have more to say about those as well as other sectors in the coming months. 

    Innovation, technology and science:  This is about not only the Government’s investment in science but also the steps we’re taking to make it easier for businesses and industries to pursue their own innovation agendas. 

    Government science institutions are being streamlined into four much more commercially focused entities that will ensure our taxpayer investment in science is connected with the needs of a growing economy.  

    We’re also thinking hard about what we can do to incentivise New Zealand businesses to invest in the new machinery, technology and equipment that will lift productivity in the years ahead.  

    We know that faster-growing countries tend to have more ‘capital intensity’ in their businesses, which helps drive productivity.  I’m keen to unlock more of that in New Zealand and am considering the best ways to support it.

    Finally, infrastructure for growth. Roads, ports, hospitals, schools and more. 

    New Zealand has an infrastructure deficit that is reducing productivity and living standards. 

    We need to catch up with the rest of the world when it comes to how we plan, fund and build modern infrastructure.  

    We are putting together a 30 year National Infrastructure Plan and a new national infrastructure agency.  Just last week we released New Zealand’s first health infrastructure plan, which sets out a national, long-term approach to renewing and expanding the country’s public health facilities.  

    Instead of building single, large-scale structures, the plan proposes a staged approach – delivering smaller, more manageable facilities in phases. This will mean patients benefit from modern healthcare environments sooner, while providing greater certainty around delivery timeframes and costs.  

    And yes, rest assured, redeveloping Nelson Hospital is a key priority for the Government. Work is already underway to expand the Emergency Department at Nelson Hospital, and earthquake strengthening of the George Mason Building is also underway. The $10.6 million ED expansion project is designed to meet the growing demand for emergency care in the area as part of the wider redevelopment programme for the hospital.

    The Health Infrastructure Plan highlights the need for increased bed capacity at Nelson Hospital, earthquake strengthening, a new energy centre and a refurbishment of the George Mason Building. These improvements are key to ensuring the hospital is able to deliver timely and quality healthcare for the people of Nelson. These stages of development of course remain subject to future Budget funding allocations.  

    Conclusion

    Taken together, all of this work represents a significant economic change agenda.  

    I doubt all of this will be welcomed by everyone. 

    It’s easy to say no to a new mine, to say no to concerts at Eden Park, to say no to more tourists, to say no to more housing, to say no to change. But cumulatively all those little “no’s” add up;  they add up to a smaller, poorer country.  

    New Zealanders can’t afford that.  We have to make it easier to get things done in this great country.  We have to deliver on our untapped potential. We owe that to our kids.

    Let me finish on a positive note: New Zealand faces some significant challenges and those challenges have only grown in recent weeks. 

    But if I could choose to be any country at this particular moment in time, I would choose New Zealand. 

    Our Government has a plan, and our plan will mean a stronger, growing economy and that growth will mean New Zealanders can live better lives. And that is what it is all about. Thank you and I look forward to your questions.

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Firearms and ammunition seized – Cheviot

    Source: New Zealand Police (District News)

    Attributable to Sergeant Rob Irvine:

    Cheviot Police have arrested and charged two people following an illegal hunting incident which saw a firearm discharged within 40 metres of a house.

    Police were notified of shots being fired from the road near a home in rural Cheviot in the early hours of 29 March. The incident woke the occupants of the house and was understandably distressing for them.

    Enquiries via CCTV identified potential offenders and a search warrant was executed at a local property, where six rifles and 163 rounds of ammunition were seized.

    A 19-year-old man has been arrested and charged with three counts of unlawful possession of firearms, unlawful possession of ammunition and discharging a firearm near a dwelling. An 18-year-old man has been charged with three counts of unlawful possession of firearms.

    The 19-year old is due to appear on 29 April and the 18-year old is due to appear 16 May. Both will appear at the Christchurch District Court.

    The rural community, farmers and landowners are concerned by the amount of poaching during this Roar period and are actively working with Police to report any illegal activity or suspicious behaviour.

    We have heard our community who tell us they are frustrated by this type of behaviour, and we will not tolerate it.

    Suspicious or illegal activity should be reported to 111 if it’s happening now. If it’s after the fact, make a report online at www.police.govt.nz/use-105 or call 105.

    ENDS

    Issued by Police Media Centre

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Senator Murray Holds Roundtable on How Trump Attacks on Health Care, Child Care, and Social Security in WA State Put Families at Risk

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Washington State Patty Murray

    ICYMI: Senator Murray Statement on Trump Budget Proposal to Fully Eliminate Head Start

    ICYMI: Senator Murray Statement on Trump Admin Ripping Away Billions—Including Over $160 Million for Washington State—to Protect People from Public Health Threats

    ICYMI: Senator Murray Statement on Evisceration of Seattle HHS Office and Spokane NIOSH Office Amidst Mass Layoffs at HHS

    ***AUDIO HERE; PHOTOS and B-ROLL HERE***

    Seattle, WA— Today, U.S. Senator Patty Murray (D-WA), Vice Chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee, held a roundtable discussion at Solid Ground in Seattle about how President Trump’s indiscriminate mass firings across the federal workforce, his funding freezes and attempts to rip away billions in public health funding for communities, and the deep cuts he is now proposing to our nation’s health care and child care infrastructure—and much else—puts programs and services that families across Washington state rely on every day at grave risk.

    Senator Murray was joined for the discussion by: Tana Senn, Secretary for the WA Department of Children, Youth, and Families (DCYF); Dr. Tao Kwan-Gett, State Health Officer, Washington State Department of Health; Shalimar Gonzales, CEO of Solid Ground; Janice Deguchi, Executive Director of Neighborhood House, a Head Start provider in Seattle; and Sarah Stafford, a Senior Tribal Specialist who worked in HHS’s Administration for Children and Families office in Seattle but is being fired through no fault of her own by Trump and Elon as part of the wide-scale Reduction in Force (RIF) at HHS.

    “We are talking about incredibly essential, basic necessities here—programs that get communities health care, programs that help families afford groceries, pay their energy bill, get child care—and let’s not forget Social Security offices are being shuttered, and Republicans are getting ready to gut Medicaid. We are getting our first look at Trump’s budget plans—it will be a bloodbath for programs our communities rely on,” said Senator Murray. “I know child care is make or break for so many families—and it has become a crisis, not just for parents, but for our economy. But Trump is already choking off funding for preschool, child care, and early learning programs. His funding delays temporarily closed at least a dozen of Head Start classrooms in Washington state—over 450 kids lost support, and more than 50 employees were out of work. Thankfully, they got their grant eventually, but the chaos is unacceptable and the threat remains. If Trump has his way with his budget, this is going to get catastrophically worse.

    “And it’s not just child care that Trump wants to zero out,” Senator Murray continued. “He is closing the HHS office in Seattle, undermining services for the Pacific Northwest. He illegally tried to rip away over $160 million awarded to Washington state for basic public health work. He wants to eliminate rural health programs—leaving our rural hospitals high and dry, shuttering our programs to train doctors in rural areas, and cutting families off from care. And he wants to cut 40 percent of NIH funding, which will push bright young minds out of our country. I am going to keep lifting up the voices of families in Washington state and I am going to fight tooth and nail to protect the programs that help them meet their basic needs from Trump’s and Elon’s chainsaw.”

    In late March, President Trump and Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary RFK Jr. announced plans to cut HHS’s workforce from 82,000 to 62,000 (a 25 percent reduction) through a combination of mass firings and buy-outs and hollow out the Department, which is responsible for protecting Americans’ health and delivering essential health and social services. The announcement followed weeks of mass firings and chaos at HHS that prevented the Department from executing its mission to protect people’s health, and an onslaught of detrimental policies that are halting lifesaving biomedical research and more.

    As part of the restructuring, the administration abruptly shuttered the HHS Region 10 office, which is based in Seattle but covers all of Washington, Alaska, Idaho, and Oregon, and has the greatest number of federally recognized Tribes (272) of all HHS regions. The closure of the HHS Region 10 office also included the closure of the Seattle Office of Head Start—among many other HHS subagency offices—and the termination of all employees who worked there.

    Since taking office, President Trump has gutted the offices that keep Head Start centers and child care programs across the country running and shuttered half of the regional offices at the Office of Head Start, which are responsible for ensuring high-quality Head Start services are available to families nationwide. Last week, new reporting revealed President Trump will propose zeroing out funding for Head Start in his forthcoming budget request—a goal proposed in Project 2025, which would cut off essential services and early childhood educational opportunities for hundreds of thousands of families nationwide. Head Start currently serves over 750,000 kids nationwide—with over 17,000 Head Start centers across the country, which are particularly important in serving rural communities with fewer options for care.

    “We are on the brink of seeing more of our communities fall victim to a deliberate and entirely preventable crisis when they are already suffering from historically high housing and food costs. If these proposed cuts to SNAP and Medicaid go through, the human toll will be profound: more families going without enough food, more people becoming seriously ill because they can’t get the medical care they need, and more of our neighbors losing their homes,” said Shalimar Gonzales, CEO of Solid Ground. “Solid Ground is committed to doing everything in our power to meet these growing needs, but we need support from partners and the local community, particularly as we face the loss of critical funding from the federal government.”

    “These cuts hurt kids,” said Tana Senn, Secretary for the Washington State Department of Children, Youth, and Families. “While there are a lot of unknowns about what’s to come, we do know that a pause or termination of federal funds would have a devastating impact on Washington families and DCYF’s ability to provide them with much-needed services.”

    “These federal cuts are weakening public health in Washington state. The closure of the Seattle HHS office took away a critical connection between our region and Washington DC—professionals who understood our unique geographic challenges and health needs,” said Dr. Tao Kwan-Gett, State Health Officer at Washington State Department of Health. “The termination of over $11 billion nationally in CDC grants, with $140 million to Washington state would devastate our disease tracking systems, cancel over 100 planned vaccine clinics including 35 school-based clinics reaching 800 children, and cripple our laboratory response capacity for emerging threats. While we’re grateful for the temporary restraining order protecting these funds, the interruptions have already disrupted critical services, and the ongoing uncertainty puts them at greater risk. These chaotic federal changes threaten to put us on a path towards more illness and shorter lives.”

    “Neighborhood House’s Head Start and Early Head Start program serves 429 low-income children pre-natal to age 5 through home based and center-based services at 4 locations, with a 5th opening at White Center in May. There are 186 eligible children on our waitlist. Head Start and Early Head Start is comprehensive, we support the whole child: their academic, social emotional growth, medical, dental, and nutritional health. Head Start and Early Head Start supports the whole family, connecting parents to jobs, housing, health care, and providing opportunities for leadership development. Defunding Head Start would cut a vital lifeline for our nation’s children and families by eliminating a bridge to stability and economic opportunity,” said Janice Deguchi, Executive Director of Neighborhood House, a Head Start provider in Seattle. “Without Low Income Heating and Assistance Program, many hard-working people Neighborhood House serves will face the impossible choice between paying utility bills and meeting other basic needs like food and medication. Eliminating LIHEAP will leave vulnerable families without the support they rely on to stay safe and stable in their homes. Community Services Block Grant advances economic independence and strengthens local communities by empowering local Community Action Agencies like Solid Ground and Neighborhood House to respond to pressing and quickly changing community needs.”

    “The [HHS] Region 10 team recruited me to work with them because the CCDF, or Child Care Development Fund, serves many tribal nations within Region 10. I would say the majority of federally recognized tribes are within Region 10 and Region 9, so it was really important previously to have a staff that represented the communities that were being served for that program…There was zero transition of planning happening, there are files that cannot be accessed that are needed by the remaining staff. The staff that are left of course are qualified and dedicated, however the years of expertise from the staff that were RIF’d—you just can’t make any sense out of it,” said Sarah Stafford, a Senior Tribal Specialist in HHS’ Administration for Children and Families who is being fired for no reason and through no fault of her own by Trump and Elon as part of the HHS Reduction in Force (RIF). “In Region 10…those staff in particular spend so much time relationship building with tribal nations and states, no two states are the same, and no two tribal nations are the same. CCDF requirements are quite complex, and people are really innovative in the ways that they choose to deliver those services, and so absent having that expertise and guidance on policy, historical institutional policy knowledge, questions are going to go unanswered, grant applications are going to take a long time to review…Our office was understaffed before, and we made some great progress within the last four years, but all of that has been completely wiped—and without any tribal consultation, which is required anytime you make substantial changes that impact tribal nations as well.”

    Senator Murray has been a leading voice raising the alarm about how Trump and Elon’s mass firings across the federal workforce will undermine services all Americans rely on and hurt families, veterans, small businesses, farmers, and so many others in Washington state and across the country. Senator Murray has spoken out on the Senate floor repeatedly against this administration’s attacks on federal workers, held multiple press conferences  with federal workers—including at NOAA—who are being fired for no reason and through no fault of their own, released information about the mass firings, and repeatedly outlined her concerns with the administration’s so-called “Fork in the Road” offer to her constituents in Washington state.

    A fact sheet on how Trump and RFK Jr. hollowing out HHS is threatening Americans’ health and wellbeing is HERE.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Hoeven, Rollins Meet with North Dakota Producers, Outline Farm Bill & Disaster Assistance Efforts

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for North Dakota John Hoeven
    04.22.25
    Senator Invited Ag Secretary to Visit State, Giving Producers Opportunity for Direct Feedback & Showcasing ND Leadership in Precision Ag at Grand Farm
    FARGO, N.D. – Senator John Hoeven today organized meetings with Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins in North Dakota, giving farmers, ranchers, agriculture researchers and agri-businesses the opportunity to:
    Give direct feedback as:
    Work proceeds on the next farm bill. Hoeven stressed the importance of keeping the farm in the farm bill and outlined efforts to invest in the farm safety net.
    The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) continues accepting applications for and distributing the $10 billion in market-based disaster assistance that Hoeven worked to secure in year-end legislation.
    To date, more than $5.8 billion in assistance has been sent out, with nearly $480 million of that going to producers in North Dakota.
    In addition, USDA today released $6 million in disaster relief for rural electric infrastructure damaged by storms and wildfires in North Dakota, which comes from the overall disaster funding Hoeven secured in December.

    Showcase North Dakota’s leadership in precision ag technologies and secure support for local initiatives like Grand Farm.
    Hoeven has secured $6 million between Fiscal Years (FY) 2022-2025 to establish and support the AgTech Cooperative Agreement between North Dakota State University (NDSU), Grand Farm and the Agricultural Research Service (ARS).

    Hoeven, who serves as chairman of the Senate Agriculture Appropriations Committee and a senior member of the Senate Agriculture Committee, invited Rollins to visit the state during her recent confirmation process.
    “North Dakota is an ag powerhouse today, and we’re making sure that, through innovation and good farm policy, our leadership in this vital sector continues to grow,” said Senator Hoeven. “I appreciate Secretary Rollins for accepting my invite to meet with our state’s farmers and ranchers right here in North Dakota and learn more about our region’s specific needs and priorities. Farming isn’t a monolith. If we want to keep our network of small family farms, we have to ensure the farm safety net actually works when it is needed most and in the wide variety of circumstances our producers face. At the same time, we are supporting our innovators through institutions like NDSU and Grand Farm in bringing new technologies to market that will help producers reduce their costs, stay competitive and continue providing the low-cost, high-quality food supply that all of America relies on every single day.”
    Strengthening the Farm Safety Net
    Hoeven continues working to pass a farm bill that addresses producers’ needs and ensures the farm safety net works when needed most. These priorities include:
    Enhancing crop insurance, the primary risk management tool for many producers.
    Improving the affordability of higher levels of coverage, consistent with Hoeven’s FARMER Act, will better enable producers to weather natural disasters and reduce the need for future ad-hoc disaster assistance.

    Improving the counter-cyclical safety net, including the Agriculture Risk Coverage (ARC) and Price Loss Coverage (PLC) programs.
    Securing adequate access to credit by including his legislation to modernize Farm Service Agency (FSA) loan limits as part of the farm bill.
    Strengthening livestock disaster programs, including the Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP), the Livestock Forage Program (LFP) and the Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP).
    Ensuring support for U.S. sugar policy.
    Making programs voluntary and farmer-friendly, instead of one-size-fits-all.
    Helping Producers Recover from Disasters
    Last month, USDA released details for the $10 billion in market-based assistance, following Hoeven’s efforts to secure the funding and his work with Secretary Rollins to implement and quickly deliver the assistance. At the same time, Hoeven continues working with USDA to advance the $21 billion in weather-related assistance for losses in 2023 and 2024, which includes $2 billion set aside for livestock producers, including those with losses due to wildfires.
    Applications for market-based assistance may be submitted online or to local Farm Service Agency (FSA) offices. Additional information and resources are available to producers on USDA’s website here: https://fsa.usda.gov/ecap.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Cortez Masto, North Las Vegas Leaders Celebrate Opening of Dolores Huerta Resource Center

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Nevada Cortez Masto

    Cortez Masto Secured $1.6 Million for Resource Center in First Bipartisan Government Funding Package for FY24

    Las Vegas, Nev. – Today, U.S. Senator Catherine Cortez Masto (D-Nev.) joined Congressman Steven Horsford (D-Nev.-04), Congresswoman Dina Titus (D-Nev.01), North Las Vegas Mayor Pamela Goynes-Brown, and North Las Vegas Councilman Isaac Barron to celebrate the opening of the Dolores Huerta Resource Center, named in honor of the longtime labor activist and co-founder of the United Farm Workers Association. In 2024, Cortez Masto secured $1,616,279 in bipartisan government funding legislation for the completion of this project.

    “Dolores Huerta is living proof that if we believe in ourselves and forge ahead with confidence, we really can change the world,” said Senator Cortez Masto. “I’m proud to have secured more than $1.5 million towards the opening of the Dolores Huerta Resource Center. I can’t think of a better way to honor her than with this community hub that will carry on her work.”

    The Dolores Huerta Resource Center will provide resources and services to the North Las Vegas community, including tutoring and homework help for school-aged children, GED preparation and college readiness workshops, bilingual language classes, job search and resume writing assistance, vocational training and certification programs, and digital literacy training for all ages.

    Senators Cortez Masto and Jacky Rosen (D-Nev.) secured more than $184 million in Community Project Funding for FY2024 to support 100 projects across Nevada. This funding included more than $7 million for nine law enforcement projects in the state. A full list of projects in Nevada receiving community project funding in the first FY24 government funding legislation can be found here.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-Evening Report: Victory for US press freedom and workers – court grants injunction in VOA media case

    Asia Pacific Report

    The US District Court for the District of Columbia has granted a preliminary injunction in Widakuswara v Lake, affirming the US Agency for Global Media (USAGM) was unlawfully shuttered by the Trump administration, Acting Director Victor Morales and Special Adviser Kari Lake.

    The decision enshrines that USAGM must fulfill its legally required functions and protects the editorial independence of Voice of America (VOA) journalists and other federal media professionals within the agency and newsrooms that receive grants from the agency, such as Radio Free Asia and others with implications for independent media in the Asia-Pacific region.

    Journalists, federal workers, and unions celebrate this important step in defending this critical agency, First Amendment rights, resisting unlawful political interference in public broadcasting, and ensuring USAGM workers can continue to fulfill their congressionally mandated function, reports the News Guild-CWA press union.

    “Today’s ruling is a victory for the rule of law, for press freedom and journalistic integrity, and for democracy worldwide,” said the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) national president Everett Kelley.

    “The Trump administration’s illegal attempt to shutter Voice of America and other outlets under the US Agency for Global Media was a transparent effort to silence the voices of patriotic journalists and professionals who have dedicated their careers to spreading the truth and fighting propaganda from lawless authoritarian regimes.

    “This preliminary injunction will allow these employees to get back to work as we continue the fight to preserve their jobs and critical mission.”

    President Lee Saunders of the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees AFSCME), the largest trade union of public employees in the United States, said: “Today’s ruling is a major win for AFSCME members and Voice of America workers who have dedicated their careers to reporting the truth and spreading freedom to millions across the world.

    Judge’s message clear
    “The judge’s message is clear — this administration has no right to unilaterally dismantle essential agencies simply because they do not agree with their purpose.

    “We celebrate this decision and will continue to work with our partners to ensure that the Voice of America is restored.”

    “Journalists hold power to account and that includes the Trump administration,” said NewsGuild-CWA president Jon Schleuss. “This injunction orders the administration to reverse course and restore the Congressionally-mandated news broadcasts of Radio Free Asia, Voice of America and other newsrooms broadcasting to people who hope for freedom in countries where that is denied.”

    “We are gratified by today’s ruling. This is another step in the process to restore VOA to full operation.” said government accountability project senior counsel David Seide.

    “VOA is more than just an iconic brand with deep roots in American and global history; it is a vital, living force that provides truth and hope to those living under oppressive regimes.” Image: Getty/The Conversation

    “Today’s ruling marks a significant victory for press freedom and for the dedicated women and men who bring it to life — our clients, the journalists, executives, and staff of Voice of America,” said Andrew G. Celli, Jr., founding partner at Emery Celli Brinckerhoff Abady Ward & Maazel LLP and counsel for the plaintiffs.

    “VOA is more than just an iconic brand with deep roots in American and global history; it is a vital, living force that provides truth and hope to those living under oppressive regimes.

    “We are thrilled that its voice — a voice for the voiceless — will once again be heard loud and clear around the world.

    Powerful affirmation of rule of law
    “This decision is a powerful affirmation of the rule of law and the vital role that independent journalism plays in our democracy. The court’s action protects independent journalism and federal media professionals at Voice of America as we continue this case, and reaffirms that no administration can silence the truth without accountability,” said Skye Perryman, president and CEO of Democracy Forward, co-counsel for the plaintiffs.

    “We are proud to be with workers, unions and journalists in resisting political interference against independent journalism and will continue to fight for transparency and our democratic values.”

    “Today’s decision is another necessary step in restoring the rule of law and correcting the injustices faced by the workers, reporters, and listeners of Voice of America and US Agency for Global Media,” said former Ambassador Norm Eisen, co-founder and executive chair of the State Democracy Defenders Fund.

    “By granting this preliminary injunction, the court has reaffirmed the legal protections afforded to these civil servants and halted an attempt to undermine a free and independent press. We are proud to represent this resilient coalition and support the cause of a free and fair press.”

    “This decision is a powerful affirmation of the role that independent journalism plays in advancing democracy and countering disinformation. From Voice of America to Radio Free Asia and across the US Agency for Global Media, these networks are essential tools of American soft power — trusted sources of truth in places where it is often scarce,” said Tom Yazdgerdi, president of the American Foreign Service Association.

    “By upholding editorial independence, the court has protected the credibility of USAGM journalists and the global mission they serve.”

    A critical victory
    “We’re very pleased that Judge Lamberth has recognised that the Trump administration acted improperly in shuttering Voice of America,” said Clayton Weimers, executive director of Reporters Without Borders (RSF) USA.

    “The USAGM must act immediately to implement this ruling and put over 1300 VOA employees back to work to deliver reliable information to their audience of millions around the world.”

    While only the beginning of what may be a long, hard-fought battle, the court’s decision to grant a preliminary injunction marks a critical victory — not just for VOA journalists, but also for federal workers and the unions that represent them.

    It affirms that the rule of law still protects those who speak truth to power.

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI USA: SBA Offers Disaster Assistance to Texas Small Businesses, Nonprofits and Residents Affected by Spring Storms

    Source: United States Small Business Administration

    SACRAMENTO, Calif. – The U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) announced the availability of low interest federal disaster loans to Texas small businesses, nonprofits and residents who sustained physical damage and economic losses from the thunderstorms, straight-line winds, and tornadoes occurring on April 4. The SBA issued a disaster declaration in response to a request received from Gov. Greg Abbott on April 17.

    The disaster declaration covers the Texas counties of Bowie, Camp, Cass, Marion, Morris, Red River, Titus and Upshur.

    Businesses and nonprofits are eligible to apply for business physical disaster loans and may borrow up to $2 million to repair or replace disaster-damaged or destroyed real estate, machinery and equipment, inventory, and other business assets.

    Homeowners and renters are eligible to apply for home and personal property loans and may borrow up to $100,000 to replace or repair personal property, such as clothing, furniture, cars, and appliances. Homeowners may apply for up to $500,000 to replace or repair their primary residence.

    Applicants may be eligible for a loan increase of up to 20% of their physical damages, as verified by the SBA, for mitigation purposes. Eligible mitigation improvements include insulating pipes, walls and attics, weather stripping doors and windows, and installing storm windows to help protect property and occupants from future disasters.

    SBA’s Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) program is available to eligible small businesses, small agricultural cooperatives, nurseries and private nonprofit (PNP) organizations impacted by financial losses directly related to this disaster. The SBA is unable to provide disaster loans to agricultural producers, farmers, or ranchers, except for aquaculture enterprises.

    EIDLs are for working capital needs caused by the disaster and are available even if the small business or PNP did not suffer any physical damage. They may be used to pay fixed debts, payroll, accounts payable, and other bills not paid due to the disaster.

    Interest rates are as low as 4% for businesses, 3.625% for nonprofits and 2.75% for homeowners and renters, with terms up to 30 years. Interest does not begin to accrue and payments are not due until 12 months from the date of the first loan disbursement. The SBA sets loan amounts and terms based on each applicant’s financial condition.

    Beginning Wednesday, April 23, SBA customer service representatives will be on hand at a Disaster Loan Outreach Center (DLOC) to answer questions about SBA’s disaster loan program, explain the application process and help individuals complete their applications. Walk-ins are accepted, but you can schedule an in-person appointment in advance at appointment.sba.gov.

    “When disasters strike, SBA’s Disaster Loan Outreach Centers play a vital role in helping small businesses and their communities recover,” said Chris Stallings, associate administrator of the Office of Disaster Recovery and Resilience at the SBA. “At these centers, SBA specialists assist business owners and residents with disaster loan applications and provide information on the full range of recovery programs available.”

    The DLOC hours of operation are listed below.

    MORRIS COUNTY
    Disaster Loan Outreach Center
    Morris County Collaborative
    200 Jefferson St.
    Daingerfield, TX  75638

    Opens at 11 a.m. Wednesday, April 23

    Mondays – Fridays, 8 a.m. – 5 p.m.

    Closes at 5 p.m. Wednesday, May 14

    To apply online, visit sba.gov/disaster. Applicants may also call SBA’s Customer Service Center at (800) 659-2955 or email disastercustomerservice@sba.gov for more information on SBA disaster assistance. For people who are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access telecommunications relay services.

    The deadline to return physical damage applications is June 20. The deadline to return economic injury applications is Jan. 21, 2026.

    ###

    About the U.S. Small Business Administration

    The U.S. Small Business Administration helps power the American dream of business ownership. As the only go-to resource and voice for small businesses backed by the strength of the federal government, the SBA empowers entrepreneurs and small business owners with the resources and support they need to start, grow, expand their businesses, or recover from a declared disaster. It delivers services through an extensive network of SBA field offices and partnerships with public and private organizations. To learn more, visit www.sba.gov.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: SBA Offers Relief to Idaho Small Businesses and Private Nonprofits Affected by the Highway 95 Landslide and Closure

    Source: United States Small Business Administration

    SACRAMENTO, Calif. – TheU.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) announced low interest federal disaster loans are now available to small businesses and private nonprofit (PNP) organizations in Idaho who sustained economic losses caused by the Highway 95 landslide and closure beginning on March 16. The SBA issued a disaster declaration in response to a request received from Gov. Brad Little on April 18.

    The disaster declaration covers the Idaho counties of Ada, Adams, Boise, Canyon, Custer, Gem, Idaho, Lemhi, Payette, Valley and Washington as well as the Oregon counties of Baker and Wallowa.

    Under this declaration, SBA’s Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) program is available to eligible small businesses, small agricultural cooperatives, nurseries, and PNPs with financial losses directly related to this disaster. The SBA is unable to provide disaster loans to agricultural producers, farmers, or ranchers, except for aquaculture enterprises.

    EIDLs are for working capital needs caused by the disaster and are available even if the business did not suffer any physical damage. They may be used to pay fixed debts, payroll, accounts payable and other bills not paid due to the disaster.

    The loan amount can be up to $2 million with interest rates as low as 4% for small businesses and 3.625% for PNPs with terms up to 30 years. Interest does not accrue, and payments are not due until 12 months from the date of the first loan disbursement. The SBA sets loan amounts and terms based on each applicant’s financial condition.

    Beginning Wednesday, April 23, SBA customer service representatives will be on hand at a Virtual Business Recovery Center to answer questions about SBA’s disaster loan program, explain the application process and help individuals complete their application.

    Virtual Business Recovery Center
    Mondays – Fridays
    8 a.m. – 4:30 p.m. Pacific Time
    FOCWAssistance@sba.gov
    (916) 735-1531
    Opens at 8 a.m., Wednesday, April 23

    The SBA encourages applicants to submit their loan applications promptly. Applications will be prioritized in the order they are received, and the SBA remains committed to processing them as efficiently as possible.

    To apply online, visit sba.gov/disaster. Applicants may also call SBA’s Customer Service Center at (800) 659‑2955 or email disastercustomerservice@sba.gov for more information on SBA disaster assistance. For people who are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access telecommunications relay services.

    The deadline to return economic injury applications to the SBA is Jan. 21, 2026.

    ###

    About the U.S. Small Business Administration

    The U.S. Small Business Administration helps power the American dream of business ownership. As the only go-to resource and voice for small businesses backed by the strength of the federal government, the SBA empowers entrepreneurs and small business owners with the resources and support they need to start, grow, expand their businesses, or recover from a declared disaster. It delivers services through an extensive network of SBA field offices and partnerships with public and private organizations. To learn more, visit www.sba.gov.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: April 22nd, 2025 Heinrich, Daines, Neguse, Leger Fernández Introduce Bipartisan Legislation to Complete the Continental Divide National Scenic Trail

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for New Mexico Martin Heinrich

    WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), Ranking Member of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, U.S. Senator Steve Daines (R-Mont.), and U.S. Representatives Joe Neguse (D-Colo.) and Teresa Leger Fernández (D-N.M.) introduced their bipartisan Continental Divide National Scenic Trail Completion Act, legislation that directs the Secretaries of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and U.S. Department of Interior to prioritize the completion of the Continental Divide National Scenic Trail (CDT).

    Designated by Congress as part of the National Trail System in 1978, the Continental Divide National Scenic Trail stretches more than 3,000 miles and passes through New Mexico, Colorado, Wyoming, Montana, and Idaho. The trail follows the Continental Divide and transverses some of the nation’s most treasured natural, historic, and cultural resources.

    Since the Continental Divide National Scenic Trail’s creation, stakeholders have worked tirelessly to complete the trail. Today, more than 160 miles of the trail require diversions onto roadways and highways, and 600 miles of the trail require relocation.Closing these gaps and relocating these segments will help better maintain the trail’s purpose while ensuring a safer and more enjoyable journey for hikers.

    “The existing Continental Divide National Scenic Trail serves as a major economic driver for communities along the trail like Grants and Silver City, New Mexico. The trail also provides recreational access to some of our most incredible natural, historic, and cultural landscapes,” said Heinrich, Ranking Member of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee. “Our Continental Divide National Scenic Trail Completion Act will finally finish incomplete portions of the trail and make it easier and safer for locals and through-hikers to access. As a National Scenic Trail, the Continental Divide Trail deserves no less.”

    “The Continental Divide Trail provides an unmatched outdoor experience for Montanans and visitors alike,” said Daines. “My bipartisan bill ensures the trail will continue to provide public access and a continuous route will finally be completed.”

    “It’s been nearly half a century since Congress formally established the Continental Divide Trail, a scenic route that spans the Rocky Mountains and crosses five states. Since then, the trail has provided the American people with world-class recreational opportunities and has served as an economic driver for the rural towns and cities along its route. In championing the Continental Divide National Scenic Trail Completion Act, we are calling on the federal government to fulfill its promise to complete the trail’s full 3,100-mile length, enhancing the benefits this iconic trail brings to both our people and our public lands,” said Neguse, Ranking Member of the House Subcommittee on Federal Lands.

    “A divided and incomplete Continental Divide Trail is calling out for congressional action to finish the job. A completed trail highlights and honors the unique cultures and environments along its route in New Mexico.” said Rep. Leger Fernández. “This bill will help grow our outdoor recreation economy and support the rural communities along the CDT. Importantly, it also makes sure we respect local landowners, Tribes, Land Grants-Mercedes, Acequias, and other land users. I look forward to co-leading the bill again this Congress with Congressman Neguse and my colleagues.”

    Specifically, the Continental Divide National Scenic Trail Completion Act: 

    • Directs the USDA Secretary and Interior Secretary to establish a Trail Completion Team comprised of the U.S. Forest Service (USFS), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and the Continental Divide National Scenic Trail Administrator. This team will be responsible for conducting optimal location reviews and to assist in developing a comprehensive development plan for the Trail.
    • Recognizes the value of cooperation between federal land managers, states, Tribes, towns, Native communities, and others. The Continental Divide Trail Completion Act directs USFS and BLM to maintain close partnerships with stakeholders in developing, maintaining, and managing the trail.
    • Requires the completion of a comprehensive development plan for the Trail, to include areas of Trail where there are gaps, opportunities for acquiring land to complete the trail, and site-specific Trail development plans.
    • Ensures that land purchased to complete the trail may only be acquired from willing sellers.

    Last year, the Continental Divide National Scenic Trail Completion Act passed through the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee with unanimous consent. The legislation has the backing of the Continental Divide Trail Coalition and a number of organizations and businesses.

    “Completing the CDT is not just about closing the gaps — it’s about all the benefits that result from ensuring connections to one of the country’s most important landscapes exist for future generations,” said Teresa Martinez, Executive Director of the Continental Divide Trail Coalition.

    Text of the Continental Divide National Scenic Trail Completion Act can be found here.

    Timeline of Actions on Continental Divide National Scenic Trail in 118th Congress:

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Security: L.A. Pawn Shop Owner Indicted for Allegedly Conspiring to Sell Stolen Andy Warhol Trial Proof and Lying to the FBI About Its Sale

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    LOS ANGELES – The owner of a pawn shop in the Mid-City area of Los Angeles was indicted today for allegedly conspiring to sell a stolen Andy Warhol print trial proof, which was shipped from the Beverly Hills office of an auction house to Dallas, then lying about it to federal agents.

    Glenn Steven Bednarsh, 58, of Farmington, Michigan and formerly of Beverly Hills, is charged in a two-count federal grand jury indictment with conspiracy and interstate transportation of stolen goods.

    He is expected to be arraigned in the coming weeks in United States District Court in downtown Los Angeles.

    According to the indictment, in February 2021, Bednarsh knowingly purchased for $6,000 a stolen Warhol trial proof depicting Russian revolutionary and Soviet Union leader Vladimir Lenin, which is worth an estimated $175,000. Bednarsh allegedly asked a co-conspirator, Brian Alec Light, 58, of Hudson, Ohio, and formerly a resident of downtown Los Angeles, to help him sell the stolen Warhol Lenin trial proof. Light then contacted the Beverly Hills of an auction house based in Dallas about selling the Warhol trial proof. 

    In March 2021, Bednarsh transported the trial proof to the Beverly Hills office of the auction house, which then shipped it to Dallas. Light e-signed an auction house consignment agreement and called the auction house to state he had dropped off the trial proof and to ask about receiving a cash advance for it.

    An employee of the auction house in Dallas reached out to the gallery in West Hollywood for its opinion of the piece, according to court documents. The gallery immediately recognized the piece as stolen, then notified the auction house and the FBI.

    Later in March 2021, when FBI agents began inquiring about the stolen Warhol trial proof, Light lied to them by saying he bought it at a Culver City garage sale for $18,000 and provided a fake receipt.

    In August and September of 2021, Bednarsh lied to FBI agents by telling them Light asked him to store the Warhol Lenin trial proof for him and that he agreed to do so out of friendship and not for financial gain. 

    An indictment is merely an allegation. All defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.

    Light pleaded guilty in November 2024 to one count of interstate transportation of stolen goods. His sentencing is currently set for May 27, and he faces up to 10 years in federal prison.

    The FBI’s Art Crime Team is investigating this matter.

    Assistant United States Attorneys Erik M. Silber of the Cyber and Intellectual Property Crimes Section and Matthew W. O’Brien of the Environmental Crime and Consumer Protection Section are prosecuting this case.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI USA: SEC Charges PGI Global Founder with $198 Million Crypto Asset and Foreign Exchange Fraud Scheme

    Source: Securities and Exchange Commission

    The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged Ramil Palafox for orchestrating a fraudulent scheme that raised approximately $198 million from investors worldwide and for misappropriating more than $57 million of investor funds.

    According to the SEC’s complaint, Palafox’s company, known as PGI Global, claimed to be a crypto asset and foreign exchange trading company. From January 2020 through October 2021, Palafox offered and sold PGI Global “membership” packages, which he claimed guaranteed investors high returns from PGI Global’s supposed crypto asset and foreign exchange trading and offered members multi-level-marketing-like referral incentives to encourage them to recruit new investors. However, as the complaint alleges, Palafox misappropriated more than $57 million in investor funds to buy Lamborghinis, items from luxury retailers, and for other personal expenses. He also used the majority of the remaining investor funds to pay other investors their purported returns and referral rewards in a Ponzi-like scheme until its collapse in late 2021.

    “As alleged in our complaint, Palafox attracted investors with the allure of guaranteed profits from sophisticated crypto asset and foreign exchange trading, but instead of trading, Palafox bought himself and his family cars, watches, and homes using millions of dollars of investor funds,” said Scott Thompson, Associate Director of the SEC’s Philadelphia Regional Office. “We will continue to investigate and take action against bad actors who take advantage of investors with promises of guaranteed passive income and other lies and deceit.”

    “Palafox used the guise of innovation to lure investors into lining his pockets with millions of dollars while leaving many victims empty-handed,” said Laura D’Allaird, Chief of the Commission’s new Cyber and Emerging Technologies Unit. “In reality, his false claims of crypto industry expertise and a supposed AI-powered auto-trading platform were just masking an international securities fraud.”

    The SEC’s complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, charges Palafox with violating the anti-fraud and registration provisions of the federal securities laws. The complaint seeks permanent injunctive relief, conduct-based injunctions preventing Palafox from participating in multi-level-marketing programs involving the offer or sale of securities and offerings of crypto assets bought or sold as a security, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains with prejudgment interest, and civil penalties. The complaint also names BBMR Threshold LLC, Darvie Mendoza, Marissa Mendoza Palafox, and Linda Ventura as relief defendants and seeks disgorgement of their ill-gotten gains and prejudgment interest.

    In a parallel action, Palafox was arraigned in U.S. District Court on criminal charges brought by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Virginia.

    The SEC’s ongoing investigation is being conducted by Michael Cuff and Polly Hayes of the Philadelphia Regional Office and Assunta Vivolo of the SEC’s Market Abuse Unit. It is being supervised by Ms. D’Allaird and Mr. Thompson. The litigation will be conducted by Spencer Willig and Gregory Bockin of the Philadelphia Regional Office and Eugene Hansen of SEC Headquarters. The Commission appreciates the assistance of the U.S. Attorney’s Office, the FBI, and the IRS.

    The SEC’s Office of Investor Education and Advocacy directs investors to resources on detecting and avoiding pyramid schemes posing as multi-level marketing programs. Investors can find additional information at Investor.gov.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: SCHUMER CELEBRATES CHOBANI INVESTING WHOPPING $1 BILLION IN MOHAWK VALLEY FOR NEW YOGURT FACTORY, CREATING 1,000 NEW GOOD-PAYING JOBS – LARGEST INVESTMENT IN NATURAL FOOD MAKING IN AMERICAN HISTORY

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for New York Charles E Schumer

    Schumer Pushed Chobani To Consider NY For Major Expansion & Has Worked With Company Since Day 1 Helping Chobani First Set Up Shop In Upstate NY And Grow By Helping Get Greek Yogurt Into National School Lunch Program

    Chobani Is America’s #1 Selling Greek Yogurt Brand And Purchases Most Of Its Dairy For NY Plants From New York Dairy Farms, Supporting Thousands Across Upstate NY

    Schumer: New Chobani Facility Is A Win-Win-Win For Chobani, NY Dairy Farmers, And Mohawk Valley Jobs & The Economy

    A longtime advocate for Chobani’s growth in Upstate NY, U.S. Senator Chuck Schumer today celebrated Chobani’s announcement it will invest $1 billion to build a new Greek yogurt manufacturing facility at the Griffiss Triangle Site in the City of Rome, the largest investment in natural food making in American history, creating 1,000 new good paying jobs. Schumer, who has long helped Chobani grow including by helping to get their Greek yogurt in the national school lunch program, said this massive new investment will help boost Upstate NY’s dairy farmers and will establish the region as a leader in yogurt production for the entire country

    “Today, Chobani makes Upstate New York the #1 Greek yogurt producer in America. Chobani’s $1 billion investment – the largest investment in natural food making in American history – is a win-win-win for Chobani, NY dairy farmers, and the Mohawk Valley economy and jobs. I’ve fought to help Chobani grow since the very beginning to lay the foundation for a day like today. When Chobani wanted to expand the reach of their delicious and nutritious Greek yogurt, I helped get them included in the national school lunch program to be enjoyed by children across the country. With this new factory, more people will be able to enjoy their ‘Made In NY’ Greek yogurt than ever before,” said Senator Schumer. “Dairy farmers are the beating heart of Upstate NY and this massive new facility and 1,000 new jobs will help support so many family farms across the state. I sincerely thank Chobani’s amazing CEO, and my very good friend, Hamdi Ulukaya for continuing his commitment to our state. I also thank Governor Hochul: without her leadership, today would not be possible. New York is proud that Chobani calls it home and more people will be enjoying their yogurt that comes from NY dairy farms made here in the Mohawk Valley than ever before.”

    Chobani, which is America’s No. 1-selling Greek yogurt brand and the second largest overall yogurt manufacturer, calls New York State home. Currently, Chobani employs over 1300 people at its Chenango County and New York City offices, and purchases 95% of its dairy from New York farmers for its products made in New York State.

    Schumer has long supported the Greek yogurt industry in Upstate New York, previously ensuring that it was included in the USDA’s school lunch program with Chobani and the broader Greek yogurt industry in mind. Schumer explained that Greek yogurt is a highly nutritious product that has become a popular and healthy food staple for millions of Americans, including students across the country who take part in the USDA Child Nutrition programs. Schumer said that starting in the fall of 2015, after his push, the USDA added Greek yogurt to its list of items available in the National School Lunch Program. Schumer has additionally called on the USDA to update its protein crediting system to ensure that Greek yogurt is given credit for the protein it contributes and is continuing his advocacy to ensure that the crediting system will ultimately reflect the nutritional quality of Greek yogurt, making it a cost-competitive option for schools to purchase.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI: Veritex Holdings, Inc. Reports First Quarter 2025 Operating Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    DALLAS, April 22, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Veritex Holdings, Inc. (“Veritex”, the “Company”, “we” or “our”) (Nasdaq: VBTX), the holding company for Veritex Community Bank, today announced the results for the quarter ended March 31, 2025.

    “We continue to strengthen our balance sheet in support of our clients during a time of change and uncertainty,” said C. Malcolm Holland, III, the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. “Key operating financial and credit performance metrics continue to improve and we remain focused on producing previously communicated 2025 goals, including a ROAA that exceeds 1%. Our focus also remains on disciplined loan growth, which is an industry wide challenge in the current environment.”

      Quarter to Date
    Financial Highlights Q1 2025   Q4 2024   Q1 2024
      (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
    (unaudited)
    GAAP          
    Net income $ 29,070     $ 24,882     $ 24,156  
    Diluted EPS   0.53       0.45       0.44  
    Book value per common share   30.08       29.37       28.23  
    Return on average assets1   0.94 %     0.78 %     0.79 %
    Return on average equity1   7.27       6.17       6.33  
    Net interest margin   3.31       3.20       3.24  
    Efficiency ratio   60.91       67.04       62.45  
    Non-GAAP2          
    Operating earnings $ 29,707     $ 29,769     $ 29,137  
    Diluted operating EPS   0.54       0.54       0.53  
    Tangible book value per common share   22.33       21.61       20.33  
    Pre-tax, pre-provision operating earnings   43,413       40,945       43,656  
    Pre-tax, pre-provision operating return on average assets1   1.41 %     1.28 %     1.42 %
    Pre-tax, pre-provision operating return on average loans1   1.89       1.72       1.84  
    Operating return on average assets1   0.96       0.93       0.95  
    Return on average tangible common equity1   10.49       9.04       9.52  
    Operating return on average tangible common equity1   10.70       10.69       11.34  
    Operating efficiency ratio   60.62       62.98       58.73  

    1 Annualized ratio.
    2 Refer to the section titled “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for a reconciliation of these non-generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) financial measures to their most directly comparable GAAP measures.

    Other First Quarter Financial, Credit and Company Highlights

    • Net interest margin (“NIM”) increased by 11 bps to 3.31%;
    • Criticized assets decreased approximately $17.7 million during the quarter;
    • Redeemed $75.0 million in subordinated notes on February 18, 2025, the associated rate of which switched from fixed to floating, SOFR + 347 bps, on November 15, 2024;
    • Total loan to deposit ratio declined to 88.9% as of March 31, 2025, compared to 89.3% as of December 31, 2024 and 91.7% as of March 31, 2024;
    • Repurchased 377,346 shares of our common stock, for approximately $9.5 million, during the quarter, which amounts to 555,016 total shares repurchased, for approximately $13.1 million, under the current Stock Buyback Program;
    • Announced the extension of the Stock Buyback Program through March 31, 2026;
    • Book value per share increased $0.71 to $30.08 and tangible book value (non-GAAP) per share increased $0.72 to $22.33;
    • Allowance for credit losses (“ACL”) to total loans held for investment (“LHI”) increased to 1.19%, compared to 1.18% as of December 31, 2024 and 1.15% as of March 31, 2024; and
    • Declared and increased our quarterly cash dividend to $0.22 per share of outstanding common stock payable on May 22, 2025.

    Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2025

    Net Interest Income

    For the three months ended March 31, 2025, net interest income before provision for credit losses was $95.4 million and NIM was 3.31% compared to $96.1 million and 3.20%, respectively, for the three months ended December 31, 2024. The approximately $700 thousand decrease, or 0.7%, in net interest income before provision for credit losses was primarily due to a $8.5 million decrease in interest income on loans and a $2.6 million decrease in interest income on deposits in financial institutions and fed funds sold partially offset by a $10.0 million decrease in interest expense on certificates and other time deposits during the three months ended March 31, 2025, compared to the three months ended December 31, 2024. NIM increased 11 bps compared to the three months ended December 31, 2024, primarily due to a decrease in funding costs on deposits and the redemption of $75.0 million of subordinated notes during the three months ended March 31, 2025, partially offset by a decrease in loan yields and average balances.

    Compared to the three months ended March 31, 2024, net interest income before provision for credit losses for the three months ended March 31, 2025 increased by $2.6 million, or 2.8%. The increase was primarily due to decreases in interest expense including $10.2 million on certificates and other time deposits, $1.6 million on transaction and savings deposits and $1.4 million on advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”), as well as increases in interest income of $1.2 million on deposits in financial institutions and fed funds sold and $3.4 million on debt securities. The increase was partially offset by a $15.4 million decrease in interest income on loans. NIM increased 7 bps from 3.24% for the three months ended March 31, 2024 to 3.31% for the three months ended March 31, 2025. The increase was primarily due to decreased funding costs on deposits and advances resulting from interest rate cuts for the year over year period, partially offset by the related declines in rates earned on interest-earnings assets, primarily loans and interest-bearing deposits in other banks.

    Noninterest Income

    Noninterest income for the three months ended March 31, 2025 was $14.3 million, an increase of $4.2 million, or 42.1%, compared to the three months ended December 31, 2024. The change was primarily due to the $4.4 million loss on sales of debt securities recognized in the three months ended December 31, 2024 with no corresponding loss recorded in the three months ended March 31, 2025. In addition, there was a $1.5 million increase in other noninterest income, driven by a $1.2 million increase in loan servicing income and a $492 thousand increase in equity securities income recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2025 compared to the three months ended December 31, 2024. The increase was partially offset by a $2.1 million decrease in government guaranteed loan income, net, as well as lower BOLI income during the period due to $517 thousand in charges on BOLI policies exchanged under a 1035 exchange which is tax-free under the Internal Revenue Code.

    Compared to the three months ended March 31, 2024, noninterest income for the three months ended March 31, 2025 increased by $7.6 million, or 114.5%. The increase was primarily due to a $6.3 million loss on sales of debt securities recognized in the three months ended March 31, 2024 with no corresponding loss recorded in the three months ended March 31, 2025. In addition, there was a $715 thousand increase in service charge and fee income and a $687 thousand increase in government guaranteed loan income for the year over year period.

    Noninterest Expense

    Noninterest expense was $66.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025, compared to $71.2 million for the three months ended December 31, 2024, a decrease of $4.4 million, or 6.1%. The decrease was primarily due to an $822 thousand decrease in salaries and employee benefits primarily due to lower severance costs, offset by an increase in payroll taxes, which are historically higher in the first quarter, a $1.7 million decrease in other noninterest expense primarily driven by lower earnings credit rebates, a $864 thousand decrease in marketing expenses, a $633 thousand decrease in professional and regulatory fees and a $338 thousand decrease in data processing and software costs compared to the three months ended December 31, 2024.

    Compared to the three months ended March 31, 2024, noninterest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2025 increased by $4.7 million, or 7.6%. The increase was primarily due to a $3.3 million increase in salaries and employee benefits primarily due a $4.1 million increase in salaries expense and incentives accruals, offset by $1.4 million in higher deferred loan origination costs, which reduce salaries and employee benefit expenses. In addition, there was a $1.5 million increase in other noninterest expense, driven primarily by higher OREO expenses, a $547 thousand increase in data processing and software expense and a $486 thousand increase in marketing expenses. The increase was partially offset by a $1.1 million decrease in professional and regulatory fees compared to the three months ended March 31, 2024.

    Income Tax

    Income tax expense for the three months ended March 31, 2025 totaled $8.5 million, an increase of $304 thousand, or 3.7%, compared to the three months ended December 31, 2024. The Company’s effective tax rate was approximately 22.7% for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and was due to the recognition of an excess tax expense realized on share-based payment awards.

    Financial Condition

    Total LHI was $8.83 billion at March 31, 2025, a decrease of $70.5 million compared to December 31, 2024.

    Total deposits were $10.67 billion at March 31, 2025, a decrease of $87.5 million, or 3.3% linked quarter annualized. The decrease was primarily the result of decreases of $279.6 million in certificates and other time deposits and $54.4 million in correspondent money market accounts, partially offset by increases of $127.2 million in noninterest bearing deposits and $119.3 million in interest-bearing transaction and savings deposits.

    Credit Quality

    Nonperforming assets (“NPAs”) totaled $96.9 million, or 0.77% of total assets, of which $72.6 million represents LHI and $24.3 million represents OREO at March 31, 2025, compared to $79.2 million, or 0.62% of total assets, at December 31, 2024. The Company had net charge-offs of $4.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025. Annualized net charge-offs to average loans outstanding were 17 bps for the three months ended March 31, 2025, compared to 32 bps and 22 bps for the three months ended December 31, 2024 and March 31, 2024, respectively.

    ACL as a percentage of LHI was 1.19%, 1.18% and 1.15% at March 31, 2025, December 31, 2024 and March 31, 2024, respectively. The Company recorded a provision for credit losses on loans of $4.0 million, $2.3 million and $7.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025, December 31, 2024 and March 31, 2024, respectively. The recorded provision for credit losses for the three months ended March 31, 2025, compared to the three months ended December 31, 2024, was primarily attributable to an increase in general reserves as a result of changes in economic factors which now represents 95% of the total ACL. The balance for unfunded commitments increased to $7.4 million as of March 31, 2025, compared to $6.1 million at December 31, 2024 and we recorded a $1.3 million provision for unfunded commitments for the three months ended March 31, 2025, compared to a $401 thousand benefit for unfunded commitments for the three months ended December 31, 2024 and a $1.5 million benefit for unfunded commitments for the three months ended March 31, 2024.

    Dividend Information

    After the close of the market on Tuesday, April 22, 2025, Veritex’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.22 per share on its outstanding shares of common stock. The dividend will be paid on or after May 22, 2025 to stockholders of record as of the close of business on May 8, 2025.

    Non-GAAP Financial Measures

    Veritex’s management uses certain non-GAAP (U.S. generally accepted accounting principles) financial measures to evaluate its operating performance and provide information that is important to investors. However, non-GAAP financial measures are supplemental and should be viewed in addition to, and not as an alternative for, Veritex’s reported results prepared in accordance with GAAP. Specifically, Veritex reviews and reports tangible book value per common share of the Company; operating earnings; tangible common equity to tangible assets; return on average tangible common equity; pre-tax, pre-provision operating earnings; pre-tax, pre-provision operating return on average assets; pre-tax, pre-provision operating return on average loans; diluted operating earnings per share; operating return on average assets; operating return on average tangible common equity; and operating efficiency ratio. Veritex has included in this earnings release information related to these non-GAAP financial measures for the applicable periods presented. Please refer to “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures” after the financial highlights at the end of this earnings release for a reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures.

    Conference Call

    The Company will host an investor conference call and webcast to review the results on Wednesday, April 23, 2025, at 8:30 a.m. Central Time. Participants may pre-register for the call by visiting https://edge.media-server.com/mmc/p/7qpcarsr/ and will receive a unique PIN, which can be used when dialing in for the call.

    Participants may also register via teleconference: https://register-conf.media-server.com/register/BIcb9226ec9df94b1bbbc063029950af5d. Once registration is completed, participants will be provided with a dial-in number containing a personalized conference code to access the call. All participants are instructed to dial-in 15 minutes prior to the start time.

    A replay will be available within approximately two hours after the completion of the call, and made accessible for one week thereafter. You may access the replay via webcast through the investor relations section of Veritex’s website.

    About Veritex Holdings, Inc.

    Headquartered in Dallas, Texas, Veritex is a bank holding company that conducts banking activities through its wholly owned subsidiary, Veritex Community Bank, with locations throughout the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex and in the Houston metropolitan area. Veritex Community Bank is a Texas state chartered bank regulated by the Texas Department of Banking and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. For more information, visit www.veritexbank.com.

    Forward-Looking Statements

    This earnings release includes “forward-looking statements”, within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are based on various facts and derived utilizing assumptions, current expectations, estimates and projections and are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which change over time and are beyond our control, that may cause actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include, without limitation, statements relating to the expected payment of Veritex Holdings, Inc.’s (“Veritex”) quarterly cash dividend; the impact of certain changes in Veritex’s accounting policies, standards and interpretations; turmoil in the banking industry, responsive measures to mitigate and manage such turmoil and related supervisory and regulatory actions and costs; and Veritex’s future financial performance, business and growth strategy, projected plans and objectives, as well as other projections based on macroeconomic and industry trends, which are inherently unreliable due to the multiple factors that impact broader economic and industry trends, and any such variations may be material. Statements preceded by, followed by or that otherwise include the words “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “projects,” “estimates,” “seeks,” “targets,” “outlooks,” “plans” and similar expressions or future or conditional verbs such as “will,” “should,” “would,” “may” and “could” are generally forward-looking in nature and not historical facts, although not all forward-looking statements include the foregoing words. We refer you to the “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” sections of Veritex’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, Current Reports on Form 8-K and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), which are available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. If one or more events related to these or other risks or uncertainties materialize, or if Veritex’s underlying assumptions prove to be incorrect, actual results may differ materially from what Veritex anticipates. Accordingly, you should not place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which it is made. Veritex does not undertake any obligation, and specifically declines any obligation, to supplement, update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise, except as required by law. All forward-looking statements, expressed or implied, included in this earnings release are expressly qualified in their entirety by this cautionary statement. This cautionary statement should also be considered in connection with any subsequent written or oral forward-looking statements that Veritex or persons acting on Veritex’s behalf may issue.

    VERITEX HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    Financial Highlights
    (Unaudited)
       
      For the Quarter Ended
      Mar 31, 2025   Dec 31, 2024   Sep 30, 2024   Jun 30, 2024   Mar 31, 2024
      (Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
    Per Share Data (Common Stock):                  
    Basic EPS $ 0.53     $ 0.46     $ 0.57     $ 0.50     $ 0.44  
    Diluted EPS   0.53       0.45       0.56       0.50       0.44  
    Book value per common share   30.08       29.37       29.53       28.49       28.23  
    Tangible book value per common share1   22.33       21.61       21.72       20.62       20.33  
    Dividends paid per common share outstanding2   0.22       0.20       0.20       0.20       0.20  
                       
    Common Stock Data:                  
    Shares outstanding at period end   54,297       54,517       54,446       54,350       54,496  
    Weighted average basic shares outstanding for the period   54,486       54,489       54,409       54,457       54,444  
    Weighted average diluted shares outstanding for the period   55,123       55,237       54,932       54,823       54,842  
                       
    Summary of Credit Ratios:                  
    ACL to total LHI   1.19 %     1.18 %     1.21 %     1.16 %     1.15 %
    NPAs to total assets   0.77       0.62       0.52       0.65       0.82  
    NPAs to total loans and OREO   1.03       0.83       0.70       0.85       1.06  
    Net charge-offs to average loans outstanding3   0.17       0.32       0.01       0.28       0.22  
                       
    Summary Performance Ratios:                  
    Return on average assets3   0.94 %     0.78 %     0.96 %     0.87 %     0.79 %
    Return on average equity3   7.27       6.17       7.79       7.10       6.33  
    Return on average tangible common equity1, 3   10.49       9.04       11.33       10.54       9.52  
    Efficiency ratio   60.91       67.04       61.94       59.11       62.45  
    Net interest margin   3.31       3.20       3.30       3.29       3.24  
                       
    Selected Performance Metrics – Operating:                  
    Diluted operating EPS1 $ 0.54     $ 0.54     $ 0.59     $ 0.52     $ 0.53  
    Pre-tax, pre-provision operating return on average assets1, 3   1.41 %     1.28 %     1.38 %     1.42 %     1.42 %
    Pre-tax, pre-provision operating return on average loans1, 3   1.89       1.72       1.83       1.83       1.84  
    Operating return on average assets1,3   0.96       0.93       1.00       0.91       0.95  
    Operating return on average tangible common equity1,3   10.70       10.69       11.74       10.94       11.34  
    Operating efficiency ratio1   60.62       62.98       60.63       58.41       58.73  
                       
    Veritex Holdings, Inc. Capital Ratios:                  
    Average stockholders’ equity to average total assets   12.96 %     12.58 %     12.31 %     12.26 %     12.43 %
    Tangible common equity to tangible assets1   9.95       9.54       9.37       9.14       9.02  
    Tier 1 capital to average assets (leverage)   10.55       10.32       10.06       10.06       10.12  
    Common equity tier 1 capital   11.04       11.09       10.86       10.49       10.37  
    Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets   11.31       11.36       11.13       10.75       10.63  
    Total capital to risk-weighted assets   13.46       13.96       13.91       13.45       13.33  
    Risk weighted assets $ 11,318,220     $ 11,247,813     $ 11,290,800     $ 11,450,997     $ 11,407,446  

    1 Refer to the section titled “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures” after the financial highlights for a reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures to their most directly comparable GAAP measures.
    2 Dividend amount represents dividend paid per common share subsequent to each respective quarter end.
    3 Annualized ratio for quarterly metrics.

    VERITEX HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    Financial Highlights
    (In thousands)
     
      Mar 31, 2025   Dec 31, 2024   Sep 30, 2024   Jun 30, 2024   Mar 31, 2024
      (unaudited)       (unaudited)   (unaudited)   (unaudited)
    ASSETS                  
    Cash and due from banks $ 81,088     $ 52,486     $ 54,165     $ 53,462     $ 41,884  
    Interest bearing deposits in other banks   768,702       802,714       1,046,625       598,375       698,885  
    Cash and cash equivalents   849,790       855,200       1,100,790       651,837       740,769  
    Debt securities, net   1,463,157       1,478,538       1,423,610       1,349,354       1,344,930  
    Other investments   69,452       69,638       71,257       75,885       76,788  
    Loans held for sale (“LHFS”)   69,236       89,309       48,496       57,046       64,762  
    LHI, mortgage warehouse (“MW”)   571,775       605,411       630,650       568,047       449,531  
    LHI, excluding MW   8,828,672       8,899,133       9,028,575       9,209,094       9,249,551  
    Total loans   9,469,683       9,593,853       9,707,721       9,834,187       9,763,844  
    ACL   (111,773 )     (111,745 )     (117,162 )     (113,431 )     (112,032 )
    Bank-owned life insurance   85,424       85,324       84,776       84,233       85,359  
    Bank premises, furniture and equipment, net   112,801       113,480       114,202       105,222       105,299  
    Other real estate owned (“OREO”)   24,268       24,737       9,034       24,256       18,445  
    Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization   27,974       28,664       32,825       35,817       38,679  
    Goodwill   404,452       404,452       404,452       404,452       404,452  
    Other assets   210,863       226,200       211,471       232,518       241,863  
    Total assets $ 12,606,091     $ 12,768,341     $ 13,042,976     $ 12,684,330     $ 12,708,396  
    LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY                  
    Deposits:                  
    Noninterest-bearing deposits $ 2,318,645     $ 2,191,457     $ 2,643,894     $ 2,416,727     $ 2,349,211  
    Interest-bearing transaction and savings deposits   5,180,495       5,061,157       4,204,708       3,979,454       4,220,114  
    Certificates and other time deposits   2,679,221       2,958,861       3,625,920       3,744,596       3,486,805  
    Correspondent money market deposits   486,762       541,117       561,489       584,067       597,690  
    Total deposits   10,665,123       10,752,592       11,036,011       10,724,844       10,653,820  
    Accounts payable and other liabilities   151,579       183,944       168,415       180,585       186,027  
    Advances from FHLB                           100,000  
    Subordinated debentures and subordinated notes   155,909       230,736       230,536       230,285       230,034  
    Total liabilities   10,972,611       11,167,272       11,434,962       11,135,714       11,169,881  
    Stockholders’ equity:                  
    Common stock   615       613       613       612       611  
    Additional paid-in capital   1,329,626       1,328,748       1,324,929       1,321,995       1,319,144  
    Retained earnings   526,044       507,903       493,921       473,801       457,499  
    Accumulated other comprehensive loss   (42,170 )     (65,076 )     (40,330 )     (76,713 )     (71,157 )
    Treasury stock   (180,635 )     (171,119 )     (171,119 )     (171,079 )     (167,582 )
    Total stockholders’ equity   1,633,480       1,601,069       1,608,014       1,548,616       1,538,515  
    Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $ 12,606,091     $ 12,768,341     $ 13,042,976     $ 12,684,330     $ 12,708,396  
    VERITEX HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    Financial Highlights
    (In thousands, except per share data)
     
      For the Quarter Ended
      Mar 31, 2025   Dec 31, 2024   Sep 30, 2024   Jun 30, 2024   Mar 31, 2024
      (unaudited)   (unaudited)   (unaudited)   (unaudited)   (unaudited)
    Interest income:                  
    Loans, including fees $ 146,505     $ 154,998     $ 167,261     $ 166,979     $ 161,942  
    Debt securities   17,106       16,893       15,830       15,408       13,695  
    Deposits in financial institutions and Fed Funds sold   9,244       11,888       12,571       7,722       8,050  
    Equity securities and other investments   870       940       1,001       1,138       900  
    Total interest income   173,725       184,719       196,663       191,247       184,587  
    Interest expense:                  
    Transaction and savings deposits   45,165       44,841       47,208       45,619       46,784  
    Certificates and other time deposits   30,268       40,279       46,230       44,811       40,492  
    Advances from FHLB   27       130       47       1,468       1,391  
    Subordinated debentures and subordinated notes   2,824       3,328       3,116       3,113       3,114  
    Total interest expense   78,284       88,578       96,601       95,011       91,781  
    Net interest income   95,441       96,141       100,062       96,236       92,806  
    Provision for credit losses   4,000       2,300       4,000       8,250       7,500  
    Provision (benefit) for unfunded commitments   1,300       (401 )                 (1,541 )
    Net interest income after provisions   90,141       94,242       96,062       87,986       86,847  
    Noninterest income:                  
    Service charges and fees on deposit accounts   5,611       5,612       5,442       4,974       4,896  
    Loan fees   2,495       2,265       3,278       2,207       2,510  
    Loss on sales of debt securities         (4,397 )                 (6,304 )
    Government guaranteed loan income, net   3,301       5,368       780       1,320       2,614  
    Customer swap income   700       509       271       326       449  
    Other income   2,182       699       3,335       1,751       2,497  
    Total noninterest income   14,289       10,056       13,106       10,578       6,662  
    Noninterest expense:                  
    Salaries and employee benefits   36,624       37,446       37,370       32,790       33,365  
    Occupancy and equipment   4,650       4,633       4,789       4,585       4,677  
    Professional and regulatory fees   4,931       5,564       4,903       5,617       6,053  
    Data processing and software expense   5,403       5,741       5,268       5,097       4,856  
    Marketing   2,032       2,896       2,781       1,976       1,546  
    Amortization of intangibles   2,438       2,437       2,438       2,438       2,438  
    Telephone and communications   330       323       335       365       261  
    Other   10,426       12,154       12,216       10,273       8,920  
    Total noninterest expense   66,834       71,194       70,100       63,141       62,116  
    Income before income tax expense   37,596       33,104       39,068       35,423       31,393  
    Income tax expense   8,526       8,222       8,067       8,221       7,237  
    Net income $ 29,070     $ 24,882     $ 31,001     $ 27,202     $ 24,156  
                       
    Basic EPS $ 0.53     $ 0.46     $ 0.57     $ 0.50     $ 0.44  
    Diluted EPS $ 0.53     $ 0.45     $ 0.56     $ 0.50     $ 0.44  
    Weighted average basic shares outstanding   54,486       54,489       54,409       54,457       54,444  
    Weighted average diluted shares outstanding   55,123       55,237       54,932       54,823       54,842  
    VERITEX HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    Financial Highlights
    (Unaudited)
     
      For the Quarter Ended
      March 31, 2025   December 31, 2024   March 31, 2024
      Average
    Outstanding
    Balance
      Interest
    Earned/
    Interest
    Paid
      Average
    Yield/
    Rate
      Average
    Outstanding
    Balance
      Interest
    Earned/
    Interest
    Paid
      Average
    Yield/
    Rate
      Average
    Outstanding
    Balance
      Interest
    Earned/
    Interest
    Paid
      Average
    Yield/
    Rate
      (Dollars in thousands)
    Assets                                  
    Interest-earning assets:                                  
    Loans1 $ 8,886,905     $ 140,329     6.40 %   $ 8,957,193     $ 147,782     6.56 %   $ 9,283,815     $ 157,585       6.83 %
    LHI, MW   426,724       6,176     5.87       492,372       7,216     5.83       279,557       4,357       6.27  
    Debt securities   1,467,220       17,106     4.73       1,458,057       16,893     4.61       1,294,994       13,695       4.25  
    Interest-bearing deposits in other banks   827,751       9,244     4.53       971,451       11,888     4.87       584,593       8,050       5.54  
    Equity securities and other investments   70,696       870     4.99       72,223       940     5.18       76,269       900       4.75  
    Total interest-earning assets   11,679,296       173,725     6.03       11,951,296       184,719     6.15       11,519,228       184,587       6.44  
    ACL   (111,563 )             (117,293 )             (112,229 )        
    Noninterest-earning assets   938,401               916,969               929,043          
    Total assets $ 12,506,134             $ 12,750,972             $ 12,336,042          
                                       
    Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity                                  
    Interest-bearing liabilities:                                  
    Interest-bearing demand and savings deposits $ 5,449,091     $ 45,165     3.36 %   $ 5,001,159     $ 44,841     3.57 %   $ 4,639,445     $ 46,784       4.06 %
    Certificates and other time deposits   2,726,309       30,268     4.50       3,319,628       40,279     4.83       3,283,735       40,492       4.96  
    Advances from FHLB and Other   2,333       27     4.69       10,598       130     4.88       100,989       1,391       5.54  
    Subordinated debentures and subordinated notes   191,638       2,824     5.98       230,633       3,328     5.74       229,881       3,114       5.45  
    Total interest-bearing liabilities   8,369,371       78,284     3.79       8,562,018       88,578     4.12       8,254,050       91,781       4.47  
                                       
    Noninterest-bearing liabilities:                                  
    Noninterest-bearing deposits   2,345,586               2,400,809               2,355,315          
    Other liabilities   170,389               183,810               192,809          
    Total liabilities   10,885,346               11,146,637               10,802,174          
    Stockholders’ equity   1,620,788               1,604,335               1,533,868          
    Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $ 12,506,134             $ 12,750,972             $ 12,336,042          
                                       
    Net interest rate spread2         2.24 %           2.03 %             1.97 %
    Net interest income and margin3     $ 95,441     3.31 %       $ 96,141     3.20 %       $ 92,806       3.24 %

    1 Includes average outstanding balances of LHFS of $66.3 million, $46.4 million and $53.9 million for the quarters ended March 31, 2025, December 31, 2024, and March 31, 2024, respectively, and average balances of LHI, excluding MW.
    2 Net interest rate spread is the average yield on interest-earning assets minus the average rate on interest-bearing liabilities.
    3 Net interest margin is equal to net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets.

    VERITEX HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    Financial Highlights
    (Unaudited)
    Yield Trend
     
      For the Quarter Ended
      Mar 31,
    2025
      Dec 31,
    2024
      Sep 30,
    2024
      Jun 30,
    2024
      Mar 31,
    2024
    Average yield on interest-earning assets:                  
    Loans1   6.40 %     6.56 %     6.89 %     6.90 %     6.83 %
    LHI, MW   5.87       5.83       6.75       6.36       6.27  
    Total Loans   6.38       6.53       6.89       6.88       6.81  
    Debt securities   4.73       4.61       4.55       4.58       4.25  
    Interest-bearing deposits in other banks   4.53       4.87       5.41       5.54       5.54  
    Equity securities and other investments   4.99       5.18       5.25       5.80       4.75  
    Total interest-earning assets   6.03 %     6.15 %     6.49 %     6.54 %     6.44 %
                       
    Average rate on interest-bearing liabilities:                  
    Interest-bearing demand and savings deposits   3.36 %     3.57 %     4.00 %     4.01 %     4.06 %
    Certificates and other time deposits   4.50       4.83       5.00       5.02       4.96  
    Advances from FHLB and other   4.69       4.88       5.73       5.54       5.54  
    Subordinated debentures and subordinated notes   5.98       5.74       5.38       5.44       5.45  
    Total interest-bearing liabilities   3.79 %     4.12 %     4.46 %     4.50 %     4.47 %
                       
    Net interest rate spread2   2.24 %     2.03 %     2.03 %     2.04 %     1.97 %
    Net interest margin3   3.31 %     3.20 %     3.30 %     3.29 %     3.24 %

    1Includes average outstanding balances of LHFS of $66.3 million, $46.4 million, $54.3 million, $58.5 million and $53.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025, December 31, 2024, September 30, 2024, June 30, 2024, and March 31, 2024, respectively, and average balances of LHI, excluding MW.
    2 Net interest rate spread is the average yield on interest-earning assets minus the average rate on interest-bearing liabilities.
    3 Net interest margin is equal to net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets.

    Supplemental Yield Trend

      For the Quarter Ended
      Mar 31,
    2025
      Dec 31,
    2024
      Sep 30,
    2024
      Jun 30,
    2024
      Mar 31,
    2024
    Average cost of interest-bearing deposits   3.74 %     4.07 %     4.44 %     4.46 %     4.43 %
    Average costs of total deposits, including noninterest-bearing   2.91       3.16       3.42       3.46       3.42  
    VERITEX HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    Financial Highlights
    (Unaudited)
     
    LHI and Deposit Portfolio Composition
     
      Mar 31,
    2025
      Dec 31,
    2024
      Sep 30,
    2024
      Jun 30,
    2024
      Mar 31,
    2024
      (Dollars in thousands)
    LHI1                                      
    Commercial and Industrial (“C&I”) $ 2,717,037       30.7 %   $ 2,693,538       30.2 %   $ 2,728,544       30.2 %   $ 2,798,260       30.4 %   $ 2,785,987       30.1 %
    Real Estate:                                      
    Owner occupied commercial (“OOCRE”)   795,808       9.0       780,003       8.8       807,223       8.9       806,285       8.7       788,376       8.5  
    Non-owner occupied commercial (“NOOCRE”)   2,266,526       25.6       2,382,499       26.7       2,338,094       25.9       2,369,848       25.7       2,352,993       25.5  
    Construction and land   1,214,260       13.7       1,303,711       14.7       1,436,540       15.8       1,536,580       16.7       1,568,257       16.9  
    Farmland   31,339       0.4       31,690       0.4       32,254       0.4       30,512       0.3       30,979       0.3  
    1-4 family residential   1,021,293       11.6       957,341       10.7       944,755       10.5       917,402       10.0       969,401       10.5  
    Multi-family residential   782,412       8.9       750,218       8.4       738,090       8.2       748,740       8.1       751,607       8.1  
    Consumer   8,597       0.1       9,115       0.1       11,292       0.1       9,245       0.1       8,882       0.1  
    Total LHI1 $ 8,837,272       100 %   $ 8,908,115       100 %   $ 9,036,792       100 %   $ 9,216,872       100 %   $ 9,256,482       100 %
                                           
    MW   571,775           605,411           630,650           568,047           449,531      
                                           
    Total LHI1 $ 9,409,047         $ 9,513,526         $ 9,667,442         $ 9,784,919         $ 9,706,013      
                                           
    Total LHFS   69,236           89,309           48,496           57,046           64,762      
                                           
    Total loans $ 9,478,283         $ 9,602,835         $ 9,715,938         $ 9,841,965         $ 9,770,775      
                                           
    Deposits                                      
    Noninterest-bearing $ 2,318,645       21.7 %   $ 2,191,457       20.4 %   $ 2,643,894       24.0 %   $ 2,416,727       22.5 %   $ 2,349,211       22.1 %
    Interest-bearing transaction   863,462       8.1       839,005       7.8       421,059       3.8       523,272       4.9       724,171       6.8  
    Money market   3,730,446       35.0       3,772,964       35.1       3,462,709       31.4       3,268,286       30.5       3,326,742       31.2  
    Savings   586,587       5.5       449,188       4.2       320,940       2.9       187,896       1.8       169,201       1.6  
    Certificates and other time deposits   2,679,221       25.1       2,958,861       27.5       3,625,920       32.8       3,744,596       34.9       3,486,805       32.7  
    Correspondent money market accounts   486,762       4.6       541,117       5.0       561,489       5.1       584,067       5.4       597,690       5.6  
    Total deposits $ 10,665,123       100 %   $ 10,752,592       100 %   $ 11,036,011       100 %   $ 10,724,844       100 %   $ 10,653,820       100 %
                                           
    Total loans to deposits ratio   88.9 %         89.3 %         88.0 %         91.8 %         91.7 %    
                                           
    Total loans to deposit ratio, excluding MW loans and LHFS   82.9 %         82.8 %         81.9 %         85.9 %         86.9 %    

    1 Total LHI does not include deferred fees of $8.6 million, $9.0 million, $8.2 million, $7.8 million and $6.9 million at March 31, 2025, December 31, 2024, September 30, 2024, June 30, 2024 and March 31, 2024, respectively.

    VERITEX HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    Financial Highlights
    (Unaudited)
    Asset Quality
     
      For the Quarter Ended
      Mar 31, 2025   Dec 31, 2024   Sep 30, 2024   Jun 30, 2024   Mar 31, 2024
      (Dollars in thousands)
    NPAs:                  
    Nonaccrual loans $ 69,188     $ 52,521     $ 55,335     $ 58,537     $ 75,721  
    Nonaccrual PCD loans1   196             70       73       9,419  
    Accruing loans 90 or more days past due2   3,249       1,914       2,860       143       220  
    Total nonperforming loans held for investment (“NPLs”)   72,633       54,435       58,265       58,753       85,360  
    Other real estate owned (“OREO”)   24,268       24,737       9,034       24,256       18,445  
    Total NPAs $ 96,901     $ 79,172     $ 67,299     $ 83,009     $ 103,805  
                       
    Charge-offs:                  
    1-4 family residential $     $     $     $ (31 )   $  
    Multifamily                     (198 )      
    OOCRE                           (120 )
    NOOCRE   (3,090 )     (5,113 )           (1,969 )     (4,293 )
    C&I   (918 )     (4,586 )     (2,259 )     (5,601 )     (946 )
    Consumer   (212 )     (420 )     (54 )     (30 )     (71 )
    Total charge-offs $ (4,220 )   $ (10,119 )   $ (2,313 )   $ (7,829 )   $ (5,430 )
                       
    Recoveries:                  
    1-4 family residential $ 21     $ 2     $ 3     $     $ 1  
    OOCRE                     120        
    NOOCRE         1,323                    
    C&I   32       1,047       1,962       361       96  
    MW               46              
    Consumer   195       30       33       497       49  
    Total recoveries $ 248     $ 2,402     $ 2,044     $ 978     $ 146  
                       
    Net charge-offs $ (3,972 )   $ (7,717 )   $ (269 )   $ (6,851 )   $ (5,284 )
                       
    Provision for credit losses $ 4,000     $ 2,300     $ 4,000     $ 8,250     $ 7,500  
                       
    ACL $ 111,773     $ 111,745     $ 117,162     $ 113,431     $ 112,032  
                       
    Asset Quality Ratios:                  
    NPAs to total assets   0.77 %     0.62 %     0.52 %     0.65 %     0.82 %
    NPAs, excluding nonaccrual PCD loans, to total assets   0.77       0.62       0.52       0.65       0.74  
    NPAs to total LHI and OREO   1.03       0.83       0.70       0.85       1.06  
    NPLs to total LHI   0.77       0.57       0.60       0.60       0.88  
    NPLs, excluding nonaccrual PCD loans, to total LHI   0.77       0.57       0.60       0.60       0.78  
    ACL to total LHI   1.19       1.18       1.21       1.16       1.15  
    ACL to total loans, excluding MW and LHFS   1.27       1.25       1.30       1.23       1.21  
    Net charge-offs to average loans outstanding3   0.17       0.32       0.01       0.28       0.22  

    1 Nonaccrual PCD loans consist of PCD loans that transitioned upon adoption of ASC 326 Financial Instruments – Credit Losses and were accounted for on a pooled basis that have subsequently been placed on nonaccrual status.
    2 Accruing loans greater than 90 days past due exclude purchase credit deteriorated loans greater than 90 days past due that are accounted for on a pooled basis.
    3 Annualized ratio for quarterly metrics.

    VERITEX HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures
    (Unaudited)
     

    We identify certain financial measures discussed in this earnings release as being “non-GAAP financial measures.” In accordance with SEC rules, we classify a financial measure as being a non-GAAP financial measure if that financial measure excludes or includes amounts, or is subject to adjustments that have the effect of excluding or including amounts, that are included or excluded, as the case may be, in the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP, in our statements of income, balance sheets or statements of cash flows. Non-GAAP financial measures do not include operating and other statistical measures or ratios calculated using exclusively either one or both of (i) financial measures calculated in accordance with GAAP and (ii) operating measures or other measures that are not non-GAAP financial measures.

    The non-GAAP financial measures that we present in this earnings release should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for the most directly comparable or other financial measures calculated in accordance with GAAP. Moreover, the manner in which we calculate the non-GAAP financial measures that we present in this earnings release may differ from that of other companies reporting measures with similar names. You should understand how such other financial institutions calculate their financial measures that appear to be similar or have similar names to the non-GAAP financial measures we have discussed in this earnings release when comparing such non-GAAP financial measures.

    Tangible Book Value Per Common Share. Tangible book value is a non-GAAP measure generally used by financial analysts and investment bankers to evaluate financial institutions. We calculate: (a) tangible common equity as total stockholders’ equity less goodwill and core deposit intangibles, net of accumulated amortization; and (b) tangible book value per common share as tangible common equity (as described in clause (a)) divided by number of common shares outstanding. For tangible book value per common share, the most directly comparable financial measure calculated in accordance with GAAP is book value per common share.

    We believe that this measure is important to many investors in the marketplace who are interested in changes from period to period in book value per common share exclusive of changes in core deposit intangibles. Goodwill and other intangible assets have the effect of increasing total book value while not increasing our tangible book value.

    The following table reconciles, as of the dates set forth below, total stockholders’ equity to tangible common equity and presents our tangible book value per common share compared with our book value per common share:

      As of
      Mar 31, 2025   Dec 31, 2024   Sep 30, 2024   Jun 30, 2024   Mar 31, 2024
      (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
    Tangible Common Equity                  
    Total stockholders’ equity $ 1,633,480     $ 1,601,069     $ 1,608,014     $ 1,548,616     $ 1,538,515  
    Adjustments:                  
    Goodwill   (404,452 )     (404,452 )     (404,452 )     (404,452 )     (404,452 )
    Core deposit intangibles   (16,306 )     (18,744 )     (21,182 )     (23,619 )     (26,057 )
    Tangible common equity $ 1,212,722     $ 1,177,873     $ 1,182,380     $ 1,120,545     $ 1,108,006  
    Common shares outstanding   54,297       54,517       54,446       54,350       54,496  
                       
    Book value per common share $ 30.08     $ 29.37     $ 29.53     $ 28.49     $ 28.23  
    Tangible book value per common share $ 22.33     $ 21.61     $ 21.72     $ 20.62     $ 20.33  
    VERITEX HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures
    (Unaudited)
     

    Tangible Common Equity to Tangible Assets. Tangible common equity to tangible assets is a non-GAAP measure generally used by financial analysts and investment bankers to evaluate financial institutions. We calculate: (a) tangible common equity as total stockholders’ equity, less goodwill and core deposit intangibles, net of accumulated amortization; (b) tangible assets as total assets less goodwill and core deposit intangibles, net of accumulated amortization; and (c) tangible common equity to tangible assets as tangible common equity (as described in clause (a)) divided by tangible assets (as described in clause (b)). For tangible common equity to tangible assets, the most directly comparable financial measure calculated in accordance with GAAP is total stockholders’ equity to total assets.

    We believe that this measure is important to many investors in the marketplace who are interested in the relative changes from period to period in common equity and total assets, in each case, exclusive of changes in core deposit intangibles. Goodwill and other intangible assets have the effect of increasing both total stockholders’ equity and assets while not increasing our tangible common equity or tangible assets.

    The following table reconciles, as of the dates set forth below, total stockholders’ equity to tangible common equity and total assets to tangible assets and presents our tangible common equity to tangible assets:

      As of
      Mar 31, 2025   Dec 31, 2024   Sep 30, 2024   Jun 30, 2024   Mar 31, 2024
      (Dollars in thousands)
    Tangible Common Equity                  
    Total stockholders’ equity $ 1,633,480     $ 1,601,069     $ 1,608,014     $ 1,548,616     $ 1,538,515  
    Adjustments:                  
    Goodwill   (404,452 )     (404,452 )     (404,452 )     (404,452 )     (404,452 )
    Core deposit intangibles   (16,306 )     (18,744 )     (21,182 )     (23,619 )     (26,057 )
    Tangible common equity $ 1,212,722     $ 1,177,873     $ 1,182,380     $ 1,120,545     $ 1,108,006  
    Tangible Assets                  
    Total assets $ 12,606,091     $ 12,768,341     $ 13,042,976     $ 12,684,330     $ 12,708,396  
    Adjustments:                  
    Goodwill   (404,452 )     (404,452 )     (404,452 )     (404,452 )     (404,452 )
    Core deposit intangibles   (16,306 )     (18,744 )     (21,182 )     (23,619 )     (26,057 )
    Tangible Assets $ 12,185,333     $ 12,345,145     $ 12,617,342     $ 12,256,259     $ 12,277,887  
    Tangible Common Equity to Tangible Assets   9.95 %     9.54 %     9.37 %     9.14 %     9.02 %
    VERITEX HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures
    (Unaudited)
     

    Return on Average Tangible Common Equity. Return on average tangible common equity is a non-GAAP measure generally used by financial analysts and investment bankers to evaluate financial institutions. We calculate: (a) net income available for common stockholders adjusted for amortization of core deposit intangibles (which we refer to as “return”) as net income, plus amortization of core deposit intangibles, less tax benefit at the statutory rate; (b) average tangible common equity as total average stockholders’ equity less average goodwill and average core deposit intangibles, net of accumulated amortization; and (c) return (as described in clause (a)) divided by average tangible common equity (as described in clause (b)). For return on average tangible common equity, the most directly comparable financial measure calculated in accordance with GAAP is return on average equity.

    We believe that this measure is important to many investors in the marketplace who are interested in the return on common equity, exclusive of the impact of core deposit intangibles. Goodwill and core deposit intangibles have the effect of increasing total stockholders’ equity while not increasing our tangible common equity. This measure is particularly relevant to acquisitive institutions that may have higher balances in goodwill and core deposit intangibles than non-acquisitive institutions.

    The following table reconciles, as of the dates set forth below, average tangible common equity to average common equity and net income available for common stockholders adjusted for amortization of core deposit intangibles, net of taxes to net income and presents our return on average tangible common equity:

      For the Quarter Ended
      Mar 31, 2025   Dec 31, 2024   Sep 30, 2024   Jun 30, 2024   Mar 31, 2024
      (Dollars in thousands)
    Net income available for common stockholders adjusted for amortization of core deposit intangibles                  
    Net income $ 29,070     $ 24,882     $ 31,001     $ 27,202     $ 24,156  
    Adjustments:                  
    Plus: Amortization of core deposit intangibles   2,438       2,437       2,438       2,438       2,438  
    Less: Tax benefit at the statutory rate   512       512       512       512       512  
    Net income available for common stockholders adjusted for amortization of core deposit intangibles $ 30,996     $ 26,807     $ 32,927     $ 29,128     $ 26,082  
                       
    Average Tangible Common Equity                  
    Total average stockholders’ equity $ 1,620,788     $ 1,604,335     $ 1,583,401     $ 1,541,609     $ 1,533,868  
    Adjustments:                  
    Average goodwill   (404,452 )     (404,452 )     (404,452 )     (404,452 )     (404,452 )
    Average core deposit intangibles   (17,904 )     (20,342 )     (22,789 )     (25,218 )     (27,656 )
    Average tangible common equity $ 1,198,432     $ 1,179,541     $ 1,156,160     $ 1,111,939     $ 1,101,760  
    Return on Average Tangible Common Equity (Annualized)   10.49 %     9.04 %     11.33 %     10.54 %     9.52 %
    VERITEX HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures
    (Unaudited)
     

    Operating Earnings, Pre-tax, Pre-provision Operating Earnings and performance metrics calculated using Operating Earnings and Pre-tax, Pre-provision Operating Earnings, including Diluted Operating Earnings per Share, Operating Return on Average Assets, Pre-tax, Pre-Provision Operating Return on Average Assets, Pre-tax, Pre-Provision Operating Return on Average Loans, Operating Return on Average Tangible Common Equity and Operating Efficiency Ratio. Operating earnings, pre-tax, pre-provision operating earnings and the performance metrics calculated using these metrics, listed below, are non-GAAP measures used by management to evaluate the Company’s financial performance. We calculate (a) operating earnings as net income plus BOLI 1035 exchange charges, plus severance payments, plus loss on sales of debt securities available for sale (“AFS”), net, plus FDIC special assessment, less tax impact of adjustments, plus nonrecurring tax adjustments. We calculate (b) diluted operating earnings per share as operating earnings as described in clause (a) divided by weighted average diluted shares outstanding. We calculate (c) pre-tax, pre-provision operating earnings as operating earnings as described in clause (a) plus provision for income taxes, plus provision (benefit) for credit losses and unfunded commitments. We calculate (d) pre-tax, pre-provision operating return on average assets as pre-tax, pre-provision operating earnings as described in clause (a) divided by total average assets. We calculate (e) operating return on average assets as operating earnings as described in clause (a) divided by total average assets. We calculate (f) operating return on average tangible common equity as operating earnings as described in clause (a), adjusted for the amortization of intangibles and tax benefit at the statutory rate, divided by total average tangible common equity (average stockholders’ equity less average goodwill and average core deposit intangibles, net of accumulated amortization). We calculate (g) operating efficiency ratio as noninterest expense plus adjustments to operating noninterest expense divided by noninterest income plus adjustments to operating noninterest income, plus net interest income.

    We believe that these measures and the operating metrics calculated utilizing these measures are important to management and many investors in the marketplace who are interested in understanding the ongoing operating performance of the Company and provide meaningful comparisons to its peers.

    The following tables reconcile, as of the dates set forth below, operating net income and pre-tax, pre-provision operating earnings and related metrics:

      For the Quarter Ended
      Mar 31, 2025   Dec 31, 2024   Sep 30, 2024   Jun 30, 2024   Mar 31, 2024
      (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
    Operating Earnings                  
    Net income $ 29,070     $ 24,882     $ 31,001     $ 27,202     $ 24,156  
    Plus: BOLI 1035 exchange charges1   517                          
    Plus: Severance payments2         1,545       1,487       613        
    Plus: Loss on sales of AFS securities, net         4,397                   6,304  
    Plus: FDIC special assessment                     134        
    Operating pre-tax income   29,587       30,824       32,488       27,949       30,460  
    Less: Tax impact of adjustments   109       1,248       307       166       1,323  
    Plus: Nonrecurring tax adjustments   229       193             527        
    Operating earnings $ 29,707     $ 29,769     $ 32,181     $ 28,310     $ 29,137  
                       
    Weighted average diluted shares outstanding   55,123       55,237       54,932       54,823       54,842  
    Diluted EPS $ 0.53     $ 0.45     $ 0.56     $ 0.50     $ 0.44  
    Diluted operating EPS $ 0.54     $ 0.54     $ 0.59     $ 0.52     $ 0.53  

    1Represents non-recurring charges for the completion of a 1035 exchange of BOLI contracts.
    2Severance payments relate to certain restructurings made during the periods disclosed.

      For the Quarter Ended
      Mar 31, 2025   Dec 31, 2024   Sep 30, 2024   Jun 30, 2024   Mar 31, 2024
      (Dollars in thousands)
    Pre-Tax, Pre-Provision Operating Earnings                  
    Net income $ 29,070     $ 24,882     $ 31,001     $ 27,202     $ 24,156  
    Plus: Provision for income taxes   8,526       8,222       8,067       8,221       7,237  
    Plus: Provision for credit losses and unfunded commitments   5,300       1,899       4,000       8,250       5,959  
    Plus: Severance payments         1,545       1,487       613        
    Plus: Loss on sale of AFS securities, net         4,397                   6,304  
    Plus: BOLI 1035 exchange charges   517                          
    Plus: FDIC special assessment                     134        
    Pre-tax, pre-provision operating earnings $ 43,413     $ 40,945     $ 44,555     $ 44,420     $ 43,656  
                       
    Average total assets $ 12,506,134     $ 12,750,972     $ 12,861,918     $ 12,578,706     $ 12,336,042  
    Pre-tax, pre-provision operating return on average assets1   1.41 %     1.28 %     1.38 %     1.42 %     1.42 %
                       
    Average loans $ 9,313,629     $ 9,449,565     $ 9,661,774     $ 9,765,428     $ 9,563,372  
    Pre-tax, pre-provision operating return on average loans1   1.89 %     1.72 %     1.83 %     1.83 %     1.84 %
                       
    Average total assets $ 12,506,134     $ 12,750,972     $ 12,861,918     $ 12,578,706     $ 12,336,042  
    Return on average assets1   0.94 %     0.78 %     0.96 %     0.87 %     0.79 %
    Operating return on average assets1   0.96       0.93       1.00       0.91       0.95  
                       
    Operating earnings adjusted for amortization of core deposit intangibles                  
    Operating earnings $ 29,707     $ 29,769     $ 32,181     $ 28,310     $ 29,137  
    Adjustments:                  
    Plus: Amortization of core deposit intangibles   2,438       2,437       2,438       2,438       2,438  
    Less: Tax benefit at the statutory rate   512       512       512       512       512  
    Operating earnings adjusted for amortization of core deposit intangibles $ 31,633     $ 31,694     $ 34,107     $ 30,236     $ 31,063  
                       
    Average Tangible Common Equity                  
    Total average stockholders’ equity $ 1,620,788     $ 1,604,335     $ 1,583,401     $ 1,541,609     $ 1,533,868  
    Adjustments:                  
    Less: Average goodwill   (404,452 )     (404,452 )     (404,452 )     (404,452 )     (404,452 )
    Less: Average core deposit intangibles   (17,904 )     (20,342 )     (22,789 )     (25,218 )     (27,656 )
    Average tangible common equity $ 1,198,432     $ 1,179,541     $ 1,156,160     $ 1,111,939     $ 1,101,760  
    Operating return on average tangible common equity1   10.70 %     10.69 %     11.74 %     10.94 %     11.34 %
                       
    Efficiency ratio   60.91 %     67.04 %     61.94 %     59.11 %     62.45 %
    Operating efficiency ratio                  
    Net interest income $ 95,441     $ 96,141     $ 100,062     $ 96,236     $ 92,806  
    Noninterest income   14,289       10,056       13,106       10,578       6,662  
    Plus: BOLI 1035 exchange charges   517                          
    Plus: Loss on sale of AFS securities, net         4,397                   6,304  
    Operating noninterest income   14,806       14,453       13,106       10,578       12,966  
    Noninterest expense   66,834       71,194       70,100       63,141       62,116  
    Less: FDIC special assessment                     134        
    Less: Severance payments         1,545       1,487       613        
    Operating noninterest expense $ 66,834     $ 69,649     $ 68,613     $ 62,394     $ 62,116  
    Operating efficiency ratio   60.62 %     62.98 %     60.63 %     58.41 %     58.73 %

    1 Annualized ratio for quarterly metrics.

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: FS Bancorp, Inc. Reports First Quarter Net Income of $8.0 Million or $1.01 Per Diluted Share and the Forty-Ninth Consecutive Quarterly Cash Dividend

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    MOUNTLAKE TERRACE, Wash., April 22, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — FS Bancorp, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSBW) (the “Company”), the holding company for 1st Security Bank of Washington (the “Bank”) today reported 2025 first quarter net income of $8.0 million, or $1.01 per diluted share, compared to $8.4 million, or $1.06 per diluted share, for the comparable quarter one year ago. 

    “Deposit growth exceeded expectations in the first quarter of 2025, enabling the Bank to be well positioned for our loan pipeline going into the second quarter,” stated Matthew Mullet, President/CFO.

    “We are also pleased that our Board of Directors approved our forty-ninth consecutive quarterly cash dividend of $0.28 per common share, demonstrating our continued commitment to returning value to shareholders.  The cash dividend will be paid on May 22, 2025, to shareholders of record as of May 8, 2025,” noted Joe Adams, CEO.

    2025 First Quarter Highlights

    • Net income was $8.0 million for the first quarter of 2025, compared to $7.4 million for the previous quarter, and $8.4 million for the comparable quarter one year ago;
    • Total deposits increased $275.7 million, or 11.8%, to $2.62 billion at March 31, 2025, primarily due to an increase of $226.9 million in brokered deposits, compared to $2.34 billion at December 31, 2024, and increased $149.9 million, or 6.1%, from $2.47 billion at March 31, 2024.  Noninterest-bearing deposits were $676.7 million at March 31, 2025, $638.2 million at December 31, 2024, and $646.9 million at March 31, 2024, reflecting growth in core deposits; 
    • Borrowings decreased $239.0 million, or 77.6% to $68.8 million at March 31, 2025, compared to $307.8 million at December 31, 2024, and decreased $61.1 million, or 47.0%, from $129.9 million at March 31, 2024, and were primarily repositioned into wholesale brokered CDs noted above; 
    • Loans receivable, net was virtually unchanged at $2.50 billion at both March 31, 2025, and December 31, 2024, and increased $85.7 million, or 3.5%, from $2.42 billion at March 31, 2024;
    • Consumer loans, of which 87.4% are home improvement loans, decreased $11.3 million, or 1.8%, to $608.9 million at March 31, 2025, compared to $620.2 million in the previous quarter, and decreased $37.2 million, or 5.8%, from $646.1 million in the comparable quarter one year ago. During the three months ended March 31, 2025, consumer loan originations included 79.9% of home improvement loans originated with a Fair Isaac Corporation (“FICO”) score above 720;
    • Repurchased 98,317 shares of the Company’s common stock in the first quarter of 2025 at an average price of $39.06 per share with $873,000 remaining for future purchases under the existing share repurchase plan. On April 4, 2025, the Board authorized an additional share repurchase program of up to $5.0 million of the Company’s common stock;
    • Book value per share increased $0.86 to $39.12 at March 31, 2025, compared to $38.26 at December 31, 2024, and increased $3.06 from $36.06 at March 31, 2024.  Tangible book value per share (non-GAAP financial measure) increased $0.94 to $36.96 at March 31, 2025, compared to $36.02 at December 31, 2024, and increased $3.49 from $33.47 at March 31, 2024. See, “Non-GAAP Financial Measures.”
    • Segment reporting in the first quarter of 2025 reflected net income of $7.8 million for the Commercial and Consumer Banking segment and $241,000 for the Home Lending segment, compared to net income of $7.4 million and net loss of $39,000 in the prior quarter, and net income of $8.2 million and $246,000 in the first quarter of 2024, respectively; and
    • Regulatory capital ratios at the Bank were 14.4% for total risk-based capital and 11.3% for Tier 1 leverage capital at March 31, 2025, compared to 14.2% for total risk-based capital and 11.2% for Tier 1 leverage capital at December 31, 2024.

    Segment Reporting

    The Company reports on two segments: Commercial and Consumer Banking and Home Lending. The Commercial and Consumer Banking segment provides diversified financial products and services to our commercial and consumer customers. These products and services include deposit products; residential, consumer, business and commercial real estate lending and cash management services. This segment is also responsible for managing the Bank’s investment portfolio and other assets. The Home Lending segment originates one-to-four-family residential mortgage loans primarily for sale in the secondary markets as well as loans held for investment.

    The tables below provide a summary of segment reporting at or for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024 (dollars in thousands):

        At or For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2025  
    Condensed income statement:   Commercial and
    Consumer Banking
        Home Lending     Total  
    Net interest income (1)   $ 28,407     $ 2,575     $ 30,982  
    Provision for credit losses     (1,321 )     (271 )     (1,592 )
    Noninterest income (2)     2,246       2,880       5,126  
    Noninterest expense (3)     (20,176 )     (4,879 )     (25,055 )
    Income before provision for income taxes     9,156       305       9,461  
    Provision for income taxes     (1,376 )     (64 )     (1,440 )
    Net income   $ 7,780     $ 241     $ 8,021  
    Total average assets for period ended   $ 2,414,100     $ 618,412     $ 3,032,512  
    Full-time employees (“FTEs”)     454       113       567  
                             
        At or For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2024
    Condensed income statement:   Commercial and
    Consumer Banking
      Home Lending   Total
    Net interest income (1)   $ 28,086     $ 2,260     $ 30,346  
    Provision for credit losses     (1,251 )     (148 )     (1,399 )
    Noninterest income (2)     2,393       2,718       5,111  
    Noninterest expense (3)     (19,008 )     (4,521 )     (23,529 )
    Income before provision for income taxes     10,220       309       10,529  
    Provision for income taxes     (2,069 )     (63 )     (2,132 )
    Net income   $ 8,151     $ 246     $ 8,397  
    Total average assets for period ended   $ 2,401,864     $ 556,683     $ 2,958,547  
    FTEs     440       130       570  
                             

    __________________________________

    (1 ) Net interest income is the difference between interest earned on assets and the cost of liabilities to fund those assets. Interest earned includes actual interest earned on segment assets and, if the segment has excess liabilities, interest credits for providing funding to the other segment. The cost of liabilities includes interest expense on segment liabilities and, if the segment does not have enough liabilities to fund its assets, a funding charge based on the cost of assigned liabilities to fund segment assets.
    (2 ) Noninterest income includes activity from certain residential mortgage loans that were initially originated for sale and measured at fair value and subsequently transferred to loans held for investment. Gains and losses from changes in fair value for these loans are reported in earnings as a component of noninterest income. For the three months ended March 31, 2025, the Company recorded a net increase in fair value of $263,000, compared to a net increase in fair value of $2,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2024. As of March 31, 2025 and 2024, there were $14.5 million and $15.0 million, respectively, in residential mortgage loans recorded at fair value as they were previously transferred from loans held for sale to loans held for investment.
    (3 ) Noninterest expense includes allocated overhead expense from general corporate activities. Allocation is determined based on a combination of segment assets and FTEs. For the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024, the Home Lending segment included allocated overhead expenses of $1.8 million and $1.5 million, respectively.   
         

    Asset Summary

    Total assets increased $36.9 million, or 1.2%, to $3.07 billion at March 31, 2025, compared to $3.03 billion at December 31, 2024, and increased $96.4 million, or 3.2%, from $2.97 billion at March 31, 2024.  The increase in total assets at March 31, 2025, compared to December 31, 2024, included increases of $31.1 million in total cash and cash equivalents, $10.0 million in securities available-for-sale, $3.4 million in other assets, $3.2 million in loans held for sale (“HFS”) and $2.0 million in securities held-to-maturity, partially offset by decreases in FHLB stock of $10.4 million, loans receivable, net of $834,000 and core deposit intangible (“CDI”), net of $831,000. The increase compared to March 31, 2024, was primarily due to increases in loans receivable, net of $85.7 million, other assets of $21.1 million, total cash and cash equivalents of $17.3 million, and securities available-for-sale of $11.5 million. These increases were partially offset by decreases in certificates of deposit at other financial institutions of $22.0 million, loans HFS of $18.9 million, and CDI, net of $3.5 million.

    LOAN PORTFOLIO                                                                
    (Dollars in thousands)   March 31, 2025     December 31, 2024     March 31, 2024                  
    COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE (“CRE”) LOANS   Amount       %   Amount       %   Amount       %   Linked Quarter $ Change     Prior Year Quarter $ Change  
    CRE owner occupied   $ 164,911       6.5 %   $ 170,396       6.7 %   $ 174,946       7.2 %   $ (5,485 )   $ (10,035 )
    CRE non-owner occupied     174,188       6.9       174,921       6.9       184,109       7.5       (733 )     (9,921 )
    Commercial and speculative construction and development     288,978       11.4       280,798       11.1       244,217       10.0       8,180       44,761  
    Multi-family     244,940       9.7       245,222       9.7       222,410       9.1       (282 )     22,530  
    Total CRE loans     873,017       34.5       871,337       34.4       825,682       33.8       1,680       47,335  
                                                                     
    RESIDENTIAL REAL ESTATE LOANS                                                                
    One-to-four-family (excludes HFS)     637,299       25.2       617,322       24.4       580,050       23.7       19,977       57,249  
    Home equity     73,846       2.9       75,147       3.0       73,323       3.0       (1,301 )     523  
    Residential custom construction     48,810       1.9       49,902       2.0       57,129       2.3       (1,092 )     (8,319 )
    Total residential real estate loans     759,955       30.0       742,371       29.4       710,502       29.0       17,584       49,453  
                                                                     
    CONSUMER LOANS                                                                
    Indirect home improvement     532,038       21.0       541,946       21.4       568,802       23.2       (9,908 )     (36,764 )
    Marine     73,737       2.9       74,931       3.0       73,921       3.0       (1,194 )     (184 )
    Other consumer     3,118       0.1       3,304       0.1       3,409       0.1       (186 )     (291 )
    Total consumer loans     608,893       24.0       620,181       24.5       646,132       26.3       (11,288 )     (37,239 )
                                                                     
    COMMERCIAL BUSINESS LOANS                                                                
    Commercial and industrial (“C&I”)     274,956       10.9       287,014       11.3       256,429       10.6       (12,058 )     18,527  
    Warehouse lending     15,949       0.6       12,918       0.4       8,113       0.3       3,031       7,836  
    Total commercial business loans     290,905       11.5       299,932       11.7       264,542       10.9       (9,027 )     26,363  
    Total loans receivable, gross     2,532,770       100.0 %     2,533,821       100.0 %     2,446,858       100.0 %     (1,051 )     85,912  
                                                                     
    Allowance for credit losses on loans     (31,653 )             (31,870 )             (31,479 )             217       (174 )
    Total loans receivable, net   $ 2,501,117             $ 2,501,951             $ 2,415,379             $ (834 )   $ 85,738  
                                                                     

    The composition of CRE loans at the dates indicated were as follows:

    (Dollars in thousands)   Mar 31, 2025     Dec 31, 2024     Mar 31, 2024  
    CRE by Type:   Amount     Amount     Amount  
    CRE non-owner occupied:                  
    Office   $ 39,406     $ 39,697     $ 41,625  
    Retail     35,520       36,568       38,712  
    Hospitality/restaurant     27,377       27,562       24,751  
    Self-storage     19,092       19,111       21,383  
    Mixed use     18,868       17,721       19,186  
    Industrial     15,033       15,125       17,475  
    Senior housing/assisted living     7,506       7,565       8,446  
    Other (1)     6,579       6,631       6,785  
    Land     2,314       2,421       3,151  
    Education/worship     2,493       2,520       2,595  
    Total CRE non-owner occupied     174,188       174,921       184,109  
    CRE owner occupied:                  
    Agriculture     3,990       3,834       3,744  
    Industrial     66,618       67,064       63,683  
    Office     40,447       42,223       41,652  
    Retail     20,535       20,718       21,836  
    Hospitality/restaurant     7,306       10,396       10,933  
    Other (2)     8,529       8,612       8,438  
    Car wash                 7,713  
    Automobile related     7,266       7,325       7,479  
    Education/worship     4,641       4,608       4,604  
    Mixed use     5,579       5,616       4,864  
    Total CRE owner occupied     164,911       170,396       174,946  
    Total     339,099       345,317       359,055  

    __________________________________

    (1 ) Primarily includes loans secured by mobile home parks totaling $758,000, $766,000, and $789,000, RV parks totaling $681,000, $685,000, and $696,000, automobile-related collateral totaling $584,000, $589,000, and $604,000, and other collateral totaling $4.6 million, $4.6 million, and $4.7 million at March 31, 2025, December 31, 2024, and March 31, 2024, respectively.
    (2 ) Primarily includes loans secured by gas stations totaling $1.5 million, $1.5 million and $1.7 million, non-profit organization totaling $1.4 million, $1.5 million and $915,000, and other collateral totaling $5.6 million, $5.6 million and $5.8 million at March 31, 2025, December 31, 2024, and March 31, 2024, respectively.
         

    The following table includes CRE loans repricing or maturing within the next two years, excluding loans that reprice simultaneously with changes to the prime rate:

    (Dollars in thousands)     For the Quarter Ended          
    CRE by type:   Jun 30, 2025   Sep 30, 2025   Dec 31, 2025   Mar 31, 2026   Jun 30, 2026   Sep 30, 2026   Dec 31, 2026   Mar 31, 2027   Total   Current Weighted
    Average Rate
    Agriculture   $ 723   $   $ 312   $ 175   $   $ 292   $   $   $ 1,502   6.14 %
    Apartment     4,510     1,701     18,573     1,268     13,868     9,763     8,241     27,900     85,824   5.65  
    Auto related     790                                 790   4.15  
    Hotel / hospitality     1,760     1,315         115     1,265                 4,455   4.75  
    Industrial         161     10,122     981     590     1,594         13,481     26,929   5.13  
    Mixed use     3,469     244     313     2,119             382         6,527   5.74  
    Office     11,077     4,127     966     519     1,641     559     7,749     2,878     29,516   4.96  
    Other     1,309     1,147     241     890         2,493     1,497     283     7,860   5.05  
    Retail     1,738     63         436     3,474         3,423     3,059     12,193   4.11  
    Senior housing and assisted living                 2,157                     2,157   4.75 %
    Total   $ 25,376   $ 8,758   $ 30,527   $ 8,660   $ 20,838   $ 14,701   $ 21,292   $ 47,601   $ 177,753    
                                                               

    A breakdown of construction loans at the dates indicated were as follows:

    (Dollars in thousands)   March 31, 2025     December 31, 2024  
    Construction Types:   Amount     Percent     Amount     Percent  
    Commercial construction – retail   $ 8,157       2.4 %   $ 8,079       2.4 %
    Commercial construction – office     6,487       1.9       4,979       1.5  
    Commercial construction – self storage     16,012       4.7       13,480       4.1  
    Commercial construction – hotel     402       0.1              
    Multi-family     31,275       9.3       30,945       9.4  
    Custom construction – single family residential and single family manufactured residential     41,143       12.2       42,040       12.7  
    Custom construction – land, lot and acquisition and development     7,667       2.3       7,862       2.4  
    Speculative residential construction – vertical     186,042       55.1       180,381       54.5  
    Speculative residential construction – land, lot and acquisition and development     40,603       12.0       42,934       13.0  
    Total   $ 337,788       100.0 %   $ 330,700       100.0 %
                                     
    (Dollars in thousands)   March 31, 2025     March 31, 2024  
    Construction Types:   Amount     Percent     Amount     Percent  
    Commercial construction – retail   $ 8,157       2.4 %   $ 8,290       2.8 %
    Commercial construction – office     6,487       1.9       4,737       1.6  
    Commercial construction – self storage     16,012       4.7       10,000       3.3  
    Commercial construction – hotel     402       0.1       7,807       2.6  
    Multi-family     31,275       9.3       53,288       17.7  
    Custom construction – single family residential and single family manufactured residential     41,143       12.2       50,674       16.8  
    Custom construction – land, lot and acquisition and development     7,667       2.3       6,455       2.1  
    Speculative residential construction – vertical     186,042       55.1       134,047       44.5  
    Speculative residential construction – land, lot and acquisition and development     40,603       12.0       26,048       8.6  
    Total   $ 337,788       100.0 %   $ 301,346       100.0 %
                                     

    Originations of one-to-four-family loans to purchase and refinance a home for the periods indicated were as follows:

    (Dollars in thousands)   For the Three Months Ended                  
        March 31, 2025     December 31, 2024                  
        Amount     Percent     Amount     Percent     $ Change     % Change  
    Purchase   $ 120,719       83.0 %   $ 129,232       83.2 %   $ (8,513 )     (6.6 )%
    Refinance     24,677       17.0       26,116       16.8       (1,439 )     (5.5 )%
    Total   $ 145,396       100.0 %   $ 155,348       100.0 %   $ (9,952 )     (6.4 )%
                                                     
    (Dollars in thousands)   For the Three Months Ended March 31,                  
        2025     2024                  
        Amount     Percent     Amount     Percent     $ Change     % Change  
    Purchase   $ 120,719       83.0 %   $ 135,577       88.1 %   $ (14,858 )     (11.0 )%
    Refinance     24,677       17.0       18,371       11.9       6,306       34.3 %
    Total   $ 145,396       100.0 %   $ 153,948       100.0 %   $ (8,552 )     (5.6 )%
                                                     

    During the quarter ended March 31, 2025, the Company sold $91.9 million of one-to-four-family loans compared to $138.9 million during the previous quarter and $93.9 million during the same quarter one year ago. The decrease in the volume of loans sold during the current quarter compared to the prior quarter was primarily due to seasonal factors combined with economic volatility. Gross margins on home loan sales increased to 3.26% for the quarter ended March 31, 2025, compared to 3.14% in the previous quarter and decreased from 3.43% in the same quarter one year ago. Gross margins are defined as the margin on loans sold (cash sales) without the impact of deferred costs.

    Liabilities and Equity Summary

    Changes in deposits at the dates indicated were as follows:

    (Dollars in thousands)                                                
        March 31, 2025     December 31, 2024                  
    Transactional deposits:   Amount     Percent     Amount     Percent     $ Change     % Change  
    Noninterest-bearing checking   $ 659,417       25.2 %   $ 627,679       26.8 %   $ 31,738       5.1 %
    Interest-bearing checking (1)     201,469       7.7       176,561       7.5       24,908       14.1  
    Escrow accounts related to mortgages serviced (2)     17,289       0.7       10,479       0.5       6,810       65.0  
    Subtotal     878,175       33.6       814,719       34.8       63,456       7.8  
    Savings     160,332       6.1       154,188       6.6       6,144       4.0  
    Money market (3)     343,349       13.1       341,615       14.6       1,734       0.5  
    Subtotal     503,681       19.2       495,803       21.2       7,878       1.6  
    Certificates of deposit less than $100,000 (4)     639,947       24.5       440,257       18.8       199,690       45.4  
    Certificates of deposit of $100,000 through $250,000     450,836       17.2       455,594       19.5       (4,758 )     (1.0 )
    Certificates of deposit greater than $250,000     142,512       5.5       133,045       5.7       9,467       7.1  
    Subtotal     1,233,295       47.2       1,028,896       44.0       204,399       19.9  
    Total   $ 2,615,151       100.0 %   $ 2,339,418       100.0 %   $ 275,733       11.8 %
                                                     
    (Dollars in thousands)                                                
        March 31, 2025     March 31, 2024                  
    Transactional deposits:   Amount     Percent     Amount     Percent     $ Change     % Change  
    Noninterest-bearing checking   $ 659,417       25.2 %   $ 618,526       25.1 %   $ 40,891       6.6 %
    Interest-bearing checking (1)     201,469       7.7       188,050       7.6       13,419       7.1  
    Escrow accounts related to mortgages serviced (2)     17,289       0.7       28,373       1.2       (11,084 )     (39.1 )
    Subtotal     878,175       33.6       834,949       33.9       43,226       5.2  
    Savings     160,332       6.1       153,025       6.2       7,307       4.8  
    Money market (3)     343,349       13.1       364,944       14.8       (21,595 )     (5.9 )
    Subtotal     503,681       19.2       517,969       21.0       (14,288 )     (2.8 )
    Certificates of deposit less than $100,000 (4)     639,947       24.5       579,153       23.5       60,794       10.5  
    Certificates of deposit of $100,000 through $250,000     450,836       17.2       424,463       17.2       26,373       6.2  
    Certificates of deposit greater than $250,000     142,512       5.5       108,763       4.4       33,749       31.0  
    Subtotal     1,233,295       47.2       1,112,379       45.1       120,916       10.9  
    Total   $ 2,615,151       100.0 %   $ 2,465,297       100.0 %   $ 149,854       6.1 %
                                                     

    __________________________________

    (1 ) Includes $30.1 million of brokered deposits at March 31, 2025, and no brokered deposits at December 31, 2024, and at March 31, 2024.                  
    (2 ) Primarily noninterest-bearing accounts based on applicable state law.
    (3 ) Includes $251,000, $279,000 and $8.0 million of brokered deposits at March 31, 2025, December 31, 2024 and March 31, 2024, respectively.
    (4 ) Includes $339.9 million, $143.1 million, and $331.3 million of brokered deposits at March 31, 2025, December 31, 2024 and March 31, 2024, respectively.
         

    At March 31, 2025, CDs, which include retail and non-retail CDs, totaled $1.23 billion, compared to $1.03 billion at December 31, 2024 and $1.11 billion at March 31, 2024, with non-retail CDs representing 28.5%, 15.0% and 31.0% of total CDs at such dates, respectively. At March 31, 2025, non-retail CDs, which include brokered CDs, online CDs and public funds CDs, increased $196.9 million to $351.7 million, compared to $154.8 million at December 31, 2024, primarily due to an increase of $196.8 million in brokered CDs.  The increase in brokered CDs provided funds to pay down higher cost borrowings. Non-retail CDs totaled $351.7 million at March 31, 2025, compared to $344.5 million at March 31, 2024.

    At March 31, 2025, the Bank had uninsured deposits of approximately $679.4 million, compared to approximately $652.7 million at December 31, 2024, and $614.1 million at March 31, 2024.  The uninsured amounts are estimates based on the methodologies and assumptions used for the Bank’s regulatory reporting requirements.

    At March 31, 2025, borrowings decreased $239.0 million to $68.8 million at March 31, 2025, from $307.8 million at December 31, 2024, and decreased $61.1 million from $129.9 million at March 31, 2024. These borrowings were comprised solely of FHLB advances.

    Total stockholders’ equity increased $3.1 million to $298.8 million at March 31, 2025, from $295.8 million at December 31, 2024, and increased $20.9 million, from $277.9 million at March 31, 2024. The increase in stockholders’ equity at March 31, 2025, compared to December 31, 2024, was primarily due to net income of $8.0 million and $513,000 in equity award compensation, partially offset by share repurchases of $3.8 million and cash dividends paid of $2.2 million. Stockholders’ equity was also impacted by decreases in unrealized net losses on securities available for sale of $2.7 million, net of tax, and decreases in unrealized net gains on fair value and cash flow hedges of $2.6 million, net of tax, reflecting changes in market interest rates during the quarter, resulting in a $151,000 decrease in accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax. Book value per common share was $39.12 at March 31, 2025, compared to $38.26 at December 31, 2024, and $36.06 at March 31, 2024.

    The Bank is considered “well capitalized” under the capital requirements established by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) with a total risk-based capital ratio of 14.4%, a Tier 1 leverage capital ratio of 11.3%, and a common equity Tier 1 (“CET1”) capital ratio of 13.2% at March 31, 2025.

    The Company exceeded all regulatory capital requirements with a total risk-based capital ratio of 14.7%, a Tier 1 leverage capital ratio of 9.9%, and a CET1 ratio of 11.5% at March 31, 2025.

    Credit Quality

    The allowance for credit losses on loans (“ACLL”) was $31.7 million, or 1.25% of gross loans receivable (excluding loans HFS) at March 31, 2025, compared to $31.9 million, or 1.26% of gross loans receivable (excluding loans HFS), at December 31, 2024, and $31.5 million, or 1.29% of gross loans receivable (excluding loans HFS), at March 31, 2024. The slight decrease in the ACLL at March 31, 2025, compared to the prior quarter was primarily due to a decrease in the balance of higher risk consumer loans.  The increase of $174,000 in the ACLL from the same quarter the prior year was primarily due to increases in CRE loans. The allowance for credit losses on unfunded loan commitments increased $66,000 to $1.5 million at March 31, 2025, compared to $1.4 million at December 31, 2024, and decreased $35,000 from $1.5 million at March 31, 2024, primarily due to an increase in the volume of unfunded commitments on construction loans

    Nonperforming loans increased $870,000 to $14.5 million at March 31, 2025, compared to $13.6 million at December 31, 2024, and increased $2.4 million from $12.1 million at March 31, 2024. The increase in nonperforming loans compared to the prior quarter was primarily due to increases in nonperforming CRE construction and development loans of $1.5 million, nonperforming indirect home improvement loans of $1.1 million, and nonperforming one-to-four-family loans of $970,000, partially offset by decreases in nonperforming CRE loans of $1.6 million and nonperforming commercial business loans of $1.5 million. The increase in nonperforming loans compared to the same quarter the prior year was primarily due to increases in nonperforming construction and development loans of $1.8 million, nonperforming one-to-four-family loans of $961,000, and nonperforming indirect home improvement loans of $626,000, partially offset by a decrease in nonperforming commercial business loans of $1.4 million.

    Loans classified as substandard increased $602,000 to $23.5 million at March 31, 2025, compared to $22.9 million at December 31, 2024, and decreased $1.4 million from $24.9 million at March 31, 2024.  The increase in substandard loans compared to the prior quarter was primarily due to an increase of $1.5 million in CRE construction and development loans, $1.1 million in indirect home improvement loans, and $953,000 in one-to-four-family loans, partially offset by decreases in commercial business loans of $1.8 million and CRE of $1.6 million.  The decrease in substandard loans compared to the prior year was primarily due to decreases of $3.1 million in C&I loans and $1.9 million in CRE loans, partially offset by increases of $1.8 million in CRE construction and development loans, $794,000 in one-to-four-family loans, and $626,000 in indirect home improvement loans. 

    Operating Results

    Net interest income increased $636,000 to $31.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025, from $30.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2024, primarily due to an increase in total interest income of $1.9 million, partially offset by an increase in interest expense of $1.3 million. The $1.9 million increase in total interest income was primarily due to an increase of $2.3 million in interest income on loans receivable, including fees, primarily as a result of net loan growth and variable rate loans repricing higher. The $1.3 million increase in total interest expense was primarily the result of higher market interest rates and a net increase in interest bearing liabilities.

    NIM (annualized) increased six basis points to 4.32% for the three months ended March 31, 2025, from 4.26% for the same period in the prior year. The increase in NIM for the three months ended March 31, 2025, compared to the same period in 2024, reflects the increased yields on interest-earning assets. 

    The average total cost of funds, including noninterest-bearing checking, increased 17 basis points to 2.38% for the three months ended March 31, 2025, from 2.21% for the three months ended March 31, 2024. This increase was predominantly due to higher market rates for borrowings. 

    For the three months ended March 31, 2025, the provision for credit losses on loans was $1.5 million, compared to $1.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2024. The provision for credit losses on loans reflects an increase in charge-off activity. During the three months ended March 31, 2025, net charge-offs increased $247,000 to $1.7 million, compared to $1.5 million for the same period last year. This increase was the result of increased net charge-offs of $487,000 in indirect home improvement loans and $25,000 in commercial business loans, partially offset by a net reduction of net charge-offs of $213,000 in marine loans and $46,000 in other consumer loans. Management attributes the increase in net charge-offs over the year primarily to volatile economic conditions.

    Total noninterest income was unchanged at $5.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024. Total noninterest expense was $25.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025, compared to $23.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2024.  The $1.5 million increase was primarily due to a $976,000 increase in salaries and benefits and a $437,000 increase in operations expense.

    About FS Bancorp

    FS Bancorp, Inc., a Washington corporation, is the holding company for 1st Security Bank of Washington. The Bank offers a range of loan and deposit services primarily to small- and middle-market businesses and individuals in Washington and Oregon.  It operates through 27 bank branches, one headquarters office that provides loans and deposit services, and loan production offices in various suburban communities in the greater Puget Sound area, the Kennewick-Pasco-Richland metropolitan area of Washington, also known as the Tri-Cities, and in Vancouver, Washington. Additionally, the Bank services home mortgage customers across the Northwest, focusing on markets in Washington State including the Puget Sound, Tri-Cities, and Vancouver.

    Forward-Looking Statements

    When used in this press release and in other documents filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), in press releases or other public stockholder communications, or in oral statements made with the approval of an authorized executive officer, the words or phrases “believe,” “will,” “will likely result,” “are expected to,” “will continue,” “is anticipated,” “estimate,” “project,” “plans,” or similar expressions are intended to identify “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are not historical facts but instead represent management’s current expectations and forecasts regarding future events, many of which are inherently uncertain and outside of our control. Actual results may differ, possibly materially from those currently expected or projected in these forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause the Company’s actual results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements, include but are not limited to, the following: adverse impacts to economic conditions in the Company’s local market areas, other markets where the Company has lending relationships, or other aspects of the Company’s business operations or financial markets, including, without limitation, as a result of employment levels; labor shortages, the effects of inflation, a recession or slowed economic growth; changes in the interest rate environment, including the increases and decrease in the Federal Reserve benchmark rate and duration at which such interest rate levels are maintained, which could adversely affect our revenues and expenses, the values of our assets and obligations, and the availability and cost of capital and liquidity; the impact of inflation and the current and future monetary policies of the Federal Reserve in response thereto; the effects of any federal government shutdown;  increased competitive pressures, including repricing and competitors’ pricing initiatives, and their impact on our market position, loan, and deposit products; adverse changes in the securities markets, the Company’s ability to execute its plans to grow its residential construction lending, mortgage banking, and warehouse lending operations, and the geographic expansion of its indirect home improvement lending; challenges arising from expanding into new geographic markets, products, or services; secondary market conditions for loans and the Company’s ability to originate loans for sale and sell loans in the secondary market; volatility in the mortgage industry; fluctuations in deposits; liquidity issues, including our ability to borrow funds or raise additional capital, if necessary; the impact of bank failures or adverse developments at other banks and related negative press about the banking industry in general on investor and depositor sentiment; legislative and regulatory changes, including changes in banking, securities and tax law, in regulatory policies and principles, or the interpretation of regulatory capital or other rules; disruptions, security breaches, or other adverse events, failures or interruptions in, or attacks on, our information technology systems or on the third-party vendors who perform critical processing functions for us; the potential for new or increased tariffs, trade restrictions or geopolitical tensions that could affect economic activity or specific industry sectors; environmental, social and governance goals; the effects of climate change, severe weather events, natural disasters, pandemics, epidemics and other public health crises, acts of war or terrorism, civil unrest and other external events on our business; and other factors described in the Company’s latest Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, and other reports filed with or furnished to the SEC which are available on its website at www.fsbwa.com and on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov

    Any of the forward-looking statements that the Company makes in this press release and in the other public statements are based upon management’s beliefs and assumptions at the time they are made and may turn out to be incorrect because of the inaccurate assumptions the Company might make, because of the factors illustrated above or because of other factors that cannot be foreseen by the Company. Therefore, these factors should be considered in evaluating the forward-looking statements, and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. The Company does not undertake and specifically disclaims any obligation to revise any forward-looking statements to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events or circumstances after the date of such statements. 

    FS BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
    CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
    (Dollars in thousands) (Unaudited)
                                         
                                Linked     Prior Year  
        March 31,     December 31,     March 31,     Quarter     Quarter  
        2025     2024     2024     % Change     % Change  
    ASSETS                                        
    Cash and due from banks   $ 18,657     $ 19,280     $ 17,149       (3 )     9  
    Interest-bearing deposits at other financial institutions     44,084       12,355       28,257       257       56  
    Total cash and cash equivalents     62,741       31,635       45,406       98       38  
    Certificates of deposit at other financial institutions     1,234       1,727       23,222       (29 )     (95 )
    Securities available-for-sale, at fair value     291,133       281,175       279,643       4       4  
    Securities held-to-maturity, net     10,434       8,455       8,455       23       23  
    Loans held for sale, at fair value     31,038       27,835       49,957       12       (38 )
    Loans receivable, net     2,501,117       2,501,951       2,415,379             4  
    Accrued interest receivable     14,406       13,881       14,455       4        
    Premises and equipment, net     29,451       29,756       30,326       (1 )     (3 )
    Operating lease right-of-use     4,979       5,378       6,202       (7 )     (20 )
    Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost     5,256       15,621       2,909       (66 )     81  
    Deferred tax asset, net     7,009       7,059       4,832       (1 )     45  
    Bank owned life insurance (“BOLI”), net     38,778       38,528       37,958       1       2  
    MSRs, held at the lower of cost or fair value     8,926       9,204       9,009       (3 )     (1 )
    Goodwill     3,592       3,592       3,592              
    Core deposit intangible, net     12,879       13,710       16,402       (6 )     (21 )
    Other assets     43,105       39,670       21,958       9       96  
    TOTAL ASSETS   $ 3,066,078     $ 3,029,177     $ 2,969,705       1       3  
    LIABILITIES                                        
    Deposits:                                        
    Noninterest-bearing accounts   $ 676,706     $ 638,158     $ 646,899       6       5  
    Interest-bearing accounts     1,938,445       1,701,260       1,818,398       14       7  
    Total deposits     2,615,151       2,339,418       2,465,297       12       6  
    Borrowings     68,805       307,806       129,940       (78 )     (47 )
    Subordinated notes:                                        
    Principal amount     50,000       50,000       50,000              
    Unamortized debt issuance costs     (389 )     (406 )     (456 )     (4 )     (15 )
    Total subordinated notes less unamortized debt issuance costs     49,611       49,594       49,544              
    Operating lease liability     5,149       5,556       6,410       (7 )     (20 )
    Other liabilities     28,522       31,036       40,582       (8 )     (30 )
    Total liabilities     2,767,238       2,733,410       2,691,773       1       3  
    COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES                                        
    STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY                                        
    Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized; none issued or outstanding                              
    Common stock, $.01 par value; 45,000,000 shares authorized; 7,742,907 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2025, 7,833,014 at December 31, 2024, and 7,805,795 at March 31, 2024     77       78       78       (1 )     (1 )
    Additional paid-in capital     52,806       55,716       57,552       (5 )     (8 )
    Retained earnings     262,945       257,113       236,720       2       11  
    Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax     (16,988 )     (17,140 )     (16,418 )     (1 )     3  
    Total stockholders’ equity     298,840       295,767       277,932       1       8  
    TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY   $ 3,066,078     $ 3,029,177     $ 2,969,705       1       3  
                                             
    FS BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
    (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) (Unaudited)
                       
        Three Months Ended     Linked     Prior Year  
        Mar 31,     Dec 31,     Mar 31,     Quarter     Quarter  
        2025     2024     2024     % Change     % Change  
    INTEREST INCOME                                        
    Loans receivable, including fees   $ 43,303     $ 43,654     $ 40,997       (1 )     6  
    Interest and dividends on investment securities, cash and cash equivalents, and certificates of deposit at other financial institutions     3,485       3,320       3,883       5       (10 )
    Total interest and dividend income     46,788       46,974       44,880             4  
    INTEREST EXPENSE                                        
    Deposits     13,058       13,543       12,882       (4 )     1  
    Borrowings     2,263       1,831       1,167       24       94  
    Subordinated notes     485       486       485              
    Total interest expense     15,806       15,860       14,534             9  
    NET INTEREST INCOME     30,982       31,114       30,346             2  
    PROVISION FOR CREDIT LOSSES     1,592       1,522       1,399       5       14  
    NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION FOR CREDIT LOSSES     29,390       29,592       28,947       (1 )     2  
    NONINTEREST INCOME                                        
    Service charges and fee income     2,244       2,513       2,552       (11 )     (12 )
    Gain on sale of loans     1,700       1,733       1,838       (2 )     (8 )
    Gain on sale of MSRs                 8,215             NM  
    Loss on sale of investment securities, net                 (7,998 )           NM  
    Earnings on cash surrender value of BOLI     250       256       240       (2 )     4  
    Other noninterest income     932       108       264       763       253  
    Total noninterest income     5,126       4,610       5,111       11        
    NONINTEREST EXPENSE                                        
    Salaries and benefits     14,533       14,172       13,557       3       7  
    Operations     3,445       3,175       3,008       9       15  
    Occupancy     1,717       1,821       1,705       (6 )     1  
    Data processing     2,045       2,252       1,958       (9 )     4  
    Loan costs     548       781       585       (30 )     (6 )
    Professional and board fees     1,186       1,038       923       14       28  
    FDIC insurance     538       490       532       10       1  
    Marketing and advertising     221       329       227       (33 )     (3 )
    Amortization of core deposit intangible     831       876       941       (5 )     (12 )
    (Recovery) impairment of servicing rights     (9 )     (583 )     93       (98 )     (110 )
    Total noninterest expense     25,055       24,351       23,529       3       6  
    INCOME BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES     9,461       9,851       10,529       (4 )     (10 )
    PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES     1,440       2,469       2,132       (42 )     (32 )
    NET INCOME   $ 8,021     $ 7,382     $ 8,397       9       (4 )
    Basic earnings per share   $ 1.02     $ 0.94     $ 1.07       9       (5 )
    Diluted earnings per share   $ 1.01     $ 0.92     $ 1.06       10       (5 )
                                             

    KEY FINANCIAL RATIOS AND DATA (Unaudited)

        At or For the Three Months Ended  
        March 31,     December 31,     March 31,  
    PERFORMANCE RATIOS:   2025     2024     2024  
    Return on assets (ratio of net income to average total assets) (1)     1.07 %     0.98 %     1.14 %
    Return on equity (ratio of net income to average total stockholders’ equity) (1)     10.80       9.88       12.29  
    Yield on average interest-earning assets (1)     6.53       6.51       6.30  
    Average total cost of funds (1)     2.38       2.38       2.21  
    Interest rate spread information – average during period     4.15       4.13       4.09  
    Net interest margin (1)     4.32       4.31       4.26  
    Operating expense to average total assets (1)     3.35       3.24       3.20  
    Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities (1)     142.94       143.27       144.51  
    Efficiency ratio (2)     69.39       68.16       66.36  
    Common equity ratio (ratio of stockholders’ equity to total assets)     9.75       9.76       9.36  
    Tangible common equity ratio (3)     9.26       9.25       8.74  
                             
        March 31,     December 31,     March 31,  
    ASSET QUALITY RATIOS AND DATA:   2025     2024     2024  
    Nonperforming assets to total assets at end of period (4)     0.47 %     0.45 %     0.41 %
    Nonperforming loans to total gross loans (excluding loans HFS) (5)     0.57       0.54       0.49  
    Allowance for credit losses – loans to nonperforming loans (5)     219.08       234.55       260.24  
    Allowance for credit losses – loans to total gross loans (excluding loans HFS)     1.25       1.26       1.29  
                             
        At or For the Three Months Ended    
        March 31,       December 31,       March 31,    
    PER COMMON SHARE DATA:   2025       2024       2024    
    Basic earnings per share   $ 1.02       $ 0.94       $ 1.07    
    Diluted earnings per share   $ 1.01       $ 0.92       $ 1.06    
    Weighted average basic shares outstanding     7,695,320         7,723,250         7,703,789    
    Weighted average diluted shares outstanding     7,805,728         7,897,099         7,824,460    
    Common shares outstanding at end of period     7,639,844   (6)     7,729,951   (7)     7,707,651   (8)
    Book value per share using common shares outstanding   $ 39.12       $ 38.26       $ 36.06    
    Tangible book value per share using common shares outstanding (9)   $ 36.96       $ 36.02       $ 33.47    
                                   

    __________________________________

    (1 ) Annualized.
    (2 ) Total noninterest expense as a percentage of net interest income and total noninterest income.
    (3 ) Represents a non-GAAP financial measure.  For a reconciliation to the most comparable GAAP financial measure, see “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” below.
    (4 ) Nonperforming assets consist of nonperforming loans (which include nonaccruing loans and accruing loans more than 90 days past due), foreclosed real estate and other repossessed assets.
    (5 ) Nonperforming loans consist of nonaccruing loans and accruing loans 90 days or more past due.
    (6 ) Common shares were calculated using shares outstanding of 7,742,907 at March 31, 2025, less 103,063 unvested restricted stock shares.
    (7 ) Common shares were calculated using shares outstanding of 7,833,014 at December 31, 2024, less 103,063 unvested restricted stock shares.
    (8 ) Common shares were calculated using shares outstanding of 7,805,795 at March 31, 2024, less 98,144 unvested restricted stock shares.
    (9 ) Tangible book value per share using outstanding common shares excludes intangible assets. This ratio represents a non-GAAP financial measure. See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” below.
         
    (Dollars in thousands)   For the Three Months Ended Mar 31,     Qtr. Over Qtr.  
    Average Balances   2025     2024     $ Change  
    Assets                        
    Loans receivable, net (1)   $ 2,559,944     $ 2,464,602     $ 95,342  
    Securities available-for-sale, at amortized cost     310,417       331,413       (20,996 )
    Securities held-to-maturity     8,656       8,500       156  
    Interest-bearing deposits and certificates of deposit at other financial institutions     16,161       59,514       (43,353 )
    FHLB stock, at cost     11,948       2,174       9,774  
    Total interest-earning assets     2,907,126       2,866,203       40,923  
    Noninterest-earning assets     125,386       92,344       33,042  
    Total assets   $ 3,032,512     $ 2,958,547     $ 73,965  
    Liabilities                        
    Interest-bearing deposit accounts   $ 1,765,605     $ 1,832,767     $ (67,162 )
    Borrowings     218,639       101,150       117,489  
    Subordinated notes     49,600       49,533       67  
    Total interest-bearing liabilities     2,033,844       1,983,450       50,394  
    Noninterest-bearing deposit accounts     663,824       657,083       6,741  
    Other noninterest-bearing liabilities     33,739       43,246       (9,507 )
    Total liabilities   $ 2,731,407     $ 2,683,779     $ 47,628  
                             

    __________________________________

    (1 ) Includes loans HFS.
         

    Non-GAAP Financial Measures:

    In addition to financial results presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles utilized in the United States (“GAAP”), this earnings release presents non-GAAP financial measures that include tangible book value per share, and tangible common equity ratio. Management believes that providing the Company’s tangible book value per share and tangible common equity ratio is consistent with the capital treatment utilized by the investment community, which excludes intangible assets from the calculation of risk-based capital ratios and facilitates comparison of the quality and composition of the Company’s capital over time and to its competitors. Where applicable, the Company has also presented comparable GAAP information.

    These non-GAAP financial measures have inherent limitations, are not required to be uniformly applied, and are not audited. They should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for total stockholders’ equity or operating results determined in accordance with GAAP. These non-GAAP measures may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies.

    Reconciliation of the GAAP book value per share and common equity ratio and the non-GAAP tangible book value per share and tangible common equity ratio is presented below.

    (Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)   March 31,   December 31,   March 31,  
    Tangible Book Value Per Share:   2025   2024   2024  
    Stockholders’ equity (GAAP)   $ 298,840     $ 295,767     $ 277,932    
    Less: goodwill and core deposit intangible, net     (16,471 )     (17,302 )     (19,994 )  
    Tangible common stockholders’ equity (non-GAAP)   $ 282,369     $ 278,465     $ 257,938    
                         
    Common shares outstanding at end of period     7,639,844   (1)   7,729,951   (2)   7,707,651   (3)
                         
    Book value per share (GAAP)   $ 39.12     $ 38.26     $ 36.06    
    Tangible book value per share (non-GAAP)   $ 36.96     $ 36.02     $ 33.47    
                         
    Tangible Common Equity Ratio:                    
    Total assets (GAAP)   $ 3,066,078     $ 3,029,177     $ 2,969,705    
    Less: goodwill and core deposit intangible assets     (16,471 )     (17,302 )     (19,994 )  
    Tangible assets (non-GAAP)   $ 3,049,607     $ 3,011,875     $ 2,949,711    
                         
    Common equity ratio (GAAP)     9.75     9.76     9.36  
    Tangible common equity ratio (non-GAAP)     9.26       9.25       8.74    
                               

    __________________________________

    (1 ) Common shares were calculated using shares outstanding of 7,742,907 at March 31, 2025, less 103,063 unvested restricted stock shares.
    (2 ) Common shares were calculated using shares outstanding of 7,833,014 at December 31, 2024, less 103,063 unvested restricted stock shares.
    (3 ) Common shares were calculated using shares outstanding of 7,805,795 at March 31, 2024, less 98,144 unvested restricted stock shares.
         

    Contacts:
    Joseph C. Adams,
    Chief Executive Officer

    Matthew D. Mullet,
    President/Chief Financial Officer

    (425) 771-5299
    www.FSBWA.com

    The MIL Network