Category: Great Britain

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: UNESCO strengthens fire resilience in the Pantanal and Cerrado with support from local communities

    Source: UNESCO World Heritage Centre

    The initiative aims to protect areas recognized as World Natural Heritage Sites and Biosphere Reserves through the Heritage Emergency Fund (HEF).

    UNESCO is intensifying its efforts in Brazil to protect areas recognized as World Natural Heritage Sites and Biosphere Reserves in response to the rise in extreme wildfires driven by climate change. Through the Heritage Emergency Fund (HEF), the organization is leading a strategic initiative to bolster fire resilience in the Pantanal of Mato Grosso and in Goiás.

    A total of 60 volunteers were trained through this project: 30 in the Pantanal Matogrossense National Park (MT), 15 in Chapada dos Veadeiros National Park (GO), and 15 in Emas National Park (GO). Around 800 pieces of equipment were distributed, including firefighting tools and Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). Additionally, an action plan is being developed to guide volunteer firefighters, based on Integrated Fire Management (IFM) and UNESCO’s Fire Risk Management Guide.

    “The project funded by the Heritage Emergency Fund makes a significant contribution to local communities by recognizing and strengthening their vital role in fire prevention and control”

    Interinstitutional initiative in the Pantanal

    From 22 to 25 April 2025, the Serra do Amolar — a remote and hard-to-reach region between Corumbá (MS) and Cáceres (MT), on the border with Bolivia — hosted a community brigade training supported by UNESCO’s Heritage Emergency Fund. The activity took place in the Pantanal Matogrossense National Park, in collaboration with WWF-Brazil, GEF Terrestrial (Funbio), Ibama (PrevFogo), Ecoa (Ecology and Action), and the Brazilian Navy.

    Three brigades, made up of 30 Pantanal residents — including 14 women — took part in the training. Over three intensive days of technical and practical lessons, participants learned fire prevention and control techniques from specialists.

    In addition to traditional methods — such as the use of specific tools, fire front control, heat mapping, and surveillance — the training incorporated agroforestry practices adapted to the Pantanal context. “One innovation was the management of slash-and-burn plots and backyard gardens. These areas, besides being vital for local subsistence, serve as ecological corridors that can protect wildlife during fires”, explains André Luiz Siqueira, Director of Ecoa.

    Another innovation was the introduction of the Sigma tool, a software developed by SOS Pantanal, which sends real-time fire alerts to mobile phones. Using satellite imagery and data such as wind direction and temperature, the technology is accessible even to those with limited formal education.

    Support from the Brazilian Navy enabled the logistics for participants and specialists, including transport via small boats, 950 liters of petrol, and 870 kilograms of food. Accommodation was provided by staff from the Chico Mendes Institute for Biodiversity Conservation (ICMBio).

    Geographical and climatic challenges in firefighting

    Corumbá, covering over 64,000 km², is the 11th largest municipality in Brazil. The rugged terrain of the Serra do Amolar and limited access via rivers or air pose logistical challenges for firefighting. The presence of peat — organic matter accumulated in wetlands — creates highly flammable biomass during the dry season, making fires frequent and intense.

    The region encompassing the Pantanal Matogrossense National Park is part of a UNESCO World Heritage Site alongside three Private Natural Heritage Reserves, and is also recognized as a Ramsar Site — an international designation for wetlands of high ecological importance.

    “The Pantanal harbors great biodiversity and is vital for fish reproduction (ichthyofauna). This region is essential for traditional peoples, sustainable tourism, and the conservation of species such as the jaguar, giant otter, and giant anteater”

    In 2024, the Pantanal experienced one of the worst wildfire seasons on record. According to the Laboratory for Environmental Satellite Applications (Lasa/UFRJ), around 2.6 million hectares — 17% of the biome — were consumed by fire. This was the second-highest figure since the historical series began in 2012, surpassed only by 2020, when 3.6 million hectares were devastated.

    “The drought pattern has changed. Although climate change is intensifying, those combating the fires are now better organized. We have more brigade members, resources, support from the National Security Force, the Armed Forces, and a more structured state response,” says Márcio Yule, coordinator of PrevFogo/Ibama in Mato Grosso do Sul.

    Extreme drought — worsened by the El Niño phenomenon — combined with improper fire use, high temperatures, and low humidity, has increased vegetation vulnerability and impacted biodiversity and traditional community livelihoods.

    I’ve been a brigade member since 2001, and the training helps us in many ways. Having the right equipment, rather than just our bare hands, makes all the difference. As traditional people, we have knowledge of fire management and know the land. When firefighters arrive, they need to talk to the community to understand what’s happening here. This combination of our knowledge, training, and equipment allows us to care for the land and the Pantanal.

    She is a quilombola and indigenous woman from the Guató people, living in the Barra de São Lourenço community — on the banks of the Cuiabá River near the Paraguay River, on the border between Mato Grosso do Sul and Mato Grosso, and the frontier with Bolivia.

    Silas Ismael

    Despite the increasingly challenging climate scenario, the combination of community mobilization, traditional knowledge, and technology has proven effective in mitigating damage. “The formation of civil brigades is more than a fire response plan — it is a territorial adaptation strategy that supports autonomy and resilience in the Pantanal,” says Osvaldo Barassi Gajardo, Conservation Specialist at WWF-Brazil.

    With each new training session, more than just skills are developed — a living protection network is built, where nature, science, and community walk hand in hand. Brigade member Eliane has a dream for the world’s largest wetland. “We care for nature, and nature cares for us. My dream is a green Pantanal full of animals”.

    Rosi do Céu, rooted in the Cerrado

    Since childhood, 47-year-old Rosilene Rodrigues da Silva Santos has guided people through the beauties and unique features of the Cerrado biome in Chapadão do Céu, Goiás, Brazil.

    “I grew up in this region. When visitors came to our house looking for tours, my parents would ask me to show them the trails, explain the routes, and teach them how to reach Emas National Park”. Today, Rosi works as a guide at the park during weekend and holidays, volunteers as a firefighter, and has served as a primary school teacher for the past 28 years. Currently, she teaches first grade at a municipal school in Chapadão do Céu from Monday to Friday.

    In 2010, a massive wildfire devastated approximately 90% of the 132,000 hectares of Emas National Park and the surrounding region. “That was my first time volunteering. The fire lasted several days, and the entire community helped. We brought clothes, supplies, and food for those battling the flames. It was my first experience with fire”.

    In her view, “nature still hasn’t fully recovered” from that fire. “The animals didn’t all return, there are far fewer now. But the Cerrado is life. It regenerates. The trees are twisted, with thick bark and deep roots. It’s on purpose. When fire comes, it doesn’t consume the forest floor. The Cerrado survives, it’s resilient,” she explains.

    In April, Rosi participated in a fire brigade training coordinated by UNESCO, with support from the Heritage Emergency Fund (HEF), and with WWF-Brazil. Trainings were held at three sites: Chapada dos Veadeiros National Park (GO), Emas National Park (GO), and Pantanal Matogrossense National Park (MT) – addressing conservation efforts across the Cerrado and Pantanal biomes.

    The training was excellent. Now we’re better prepared to manage the park during the dry season, following the management plan. And if emergencies arise, we know how to fight fires strategically, safely, and effectively.

    But if you ask Rosi do Céu (Rosi of the Sky) what she loves most, the answer is nature and wildlife. “Some people admire celebrities. I admire those who love nature. I love the wilderness and care for animals”.

    Rosi also makes handcrafted items from bamboo and wood, and rescues snakes and wild animals when needed. “Just send me a message on WhatsApp. If there’s an opossum or any creature, people say, Call Rosi, she’ll take care of it.” In 2018, she rescued a tapir and named her Preciosa (Precious). “Every time I go to Emas National Park, near where she stays, I call her name, she comes and eats from my hand. It’s love,” says the firefighter, guide, teacher, artisan, and animal caregiver.

    Eliane: ancestral wisdom

    Eliane Aires de Souza, 58 years, carries in her eyes and hands the wisdom born of deep interaction with nature and ancestral knowledge. A Pantanal native, she lives in the community of Barra de São Lourenço (MT), shaped by the waters and the vibrant life that surrounds her. She is an Indigenous woman of the Guató people, with quilombola ancestry, and works the land with knowledge and care as an agroforestry practitioner. Since 2001, she has served as a civilian firefighter, confronting the wildfires that each year are increasingly threatening the Pantanal.

    Silas Ismael

    This is our way of life. The Pantanal is our home. Having proper training and equipment helps us take care of it and protect our collective house.

    Eliane is a mother, grandmother, and president of the Renascer Women’s Association, created to strengthen the dreams and autonomy of the women in her community. In her words, she highlights the daily challenges of keeping culture alive and staying connected to the land. “Here, we live off fishing, bait, and handicrafts”.

    Eliane feels the effects of climate change and the abandonment of the rivers. She speaks with sadness of the Rio Velho, which no longer flows as it once did. “It’s like a clogged vein in the body. If we don’t take care of the river, the whole body falls ill”. For her, protecting nature means protecting herself, her family, her community, and the future. “That tree behind you is like a vein, it gives life to other lives”.

    In her daily life, Eliane cultivates an agroforestry system at home. She nurtures and protects the land. “That’s what agroforestry is: we care for it, and it cares for us”. Drawing on ancestral wisdom, she explains the importance of nourishing the soil, preserving humidity, and ensuring shade, life, and food. She grows bananas, cassava, lemons, and oranges, and dreams of more. She envisions a seedling nursery and a green corridor that reconnects fragmented forest areas, providing food for animals and nourishing hope.

    “If we keep waiting, the soil will die. And with it, our way of life”. She refuses to depend on the city for basic needs. “It’s the dream that keeps us going”.

    And perhaps it is that persistent force of dreaming, that way of resisting with hands in the soil, body in the canoe, and soul in the crafts, that keeps the Pantanal alive. As long as there are Elianes and Rosis, there will be hope for rebirth.

    About the UNESCO Heritage Emergency Fund

    This activity was supported by the UNESCO Heritage Emergency Fund (HEF). We express our gratitude to its donors: the Principality of Andorra, the Qatar Fund for Development, Canada, the Slovak Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the French Republic, the Republic of Lithuania, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, the Principality of Monaco, the Kingdom of Norway, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Republic of Poland, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the Republic of Serbia, and ANA Holdings INC.

    MIL OSI United Nations News

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: New Defence Medical Services senior appointments announced

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    News story

    New Defence Medical Services senior appointments announced

    His Majesty the King has approved three new senior appointments in the Defence Medical Services.

    Brigadier Phil Carter KHP OStJ. MOD Crown Copyright

    His Majesty the King has approved the following three senior appointments in the Defence Medical Services (DMS):

    • Brigadier Phil Carter KHP OStJ as the next Surgeon General (SG), in the rank of Major General, from August 2025
    • Brigadier Antony Finn as the next Director Medical Personnel and Training in the rank of Major General, from November 2025
    • Air Commodore Darren Ellison KHP as the next Director Defence Healthcare in the rank of Air Vice-Marshal, from June 2026

    All three have had long and distinguished careers delivering health care to the Armed Forces as part of the Defence Medical Services.

    Brigadier Carter has undertaken a variety of deployments throughout his career, including to Northern Ireland, Kosovo, Iraq, Afghanistan and Sierra Leon.  In 2008, he was appointed as the first Commanding Officer of the Royal Centre for Defence Medicine Clinical Unit. He later became Commander Medical HQ in the British Army’s 1(UK) Division and Commander Defence Primary Healthcare, before being appointed Head of Army Health in 2024.

    As Surgeon General, Brigadier Phil Carter will be responsible for:

    • providing specialist health and medical support advice to the Military Strategic Headquarters on behalf of the Director General of the Defence Medical Services.
    • Force Design within the Defence Medical Services, ensuring the readiness of the medical capability supporting the Armed Forces
    • directing medical research, medical innovation, and continuous quality improvement in Defence
    • coordinating our international technical engagement with medical partners across NATO and the UK’s broader alliances

    Brigadier Phil Carter said:

    At a time of reform across Defence, to be entrusted with the making sure that our armed forces deployed on operations have the medical support they need is a significant responsibility. I am looking forward to the challenge and enormously grateful that I will be working with such a dedicated and innovative specialist team.

    Brigadier Antony Finn. MOD Crown Copyright

    Brigadier Antony Finn qualified as a General Practitioner in 2003. Following deployments to Afghanistan, Kenya and Iraq, in July 2010 he assumed command of 1 Medical Regiment and deployed to Afghanistan as Commanding Officer of the Close Support Medical Regiment.  In 2012 he was promoted to Colonel as Assistant Director of Medical Operational Capability, before promoting to Brigadier in March 2019 as Commander 2nd Medical Brigade. From 2021-24 he was Head of Army Healthcare, and since August 2024 has been Commander of the Joint Hospital Group. 

    As part of his role as Director Medical Personnel and Training, Brigadier Antony Finn will be responsible for:

    • leading strategic medical workforce planning for DMS, including training and placement, to support to support Strategic Command (soon to be Cyber & Specialist Operations Command) and wider Defence’s people plan people plan and operational needs 
    • overseeing the development and delivery of high-quality individual training, to all entitled personnel involved in medical support to Defence
    • delivering an optimally prepared and suitably qualified and experienced personnel (SQEP) medical workforce through the provision of high-quality placements within both the NHS and other providers

    Brigadier Finn, said:

    I am deeply honoured to be selected to be the next Director of Medical Personnel and Training. The Strategic Defence Review offers unprecedented opportunities for the Defence Medical Services and our partners. I look forward to exploiting these for the benefit of our patients, the medical workforce, Defence and beyond.

    Air Commodore Darren Ellison KHP. MOD Crown Copyright

    Air Commodore Ellison joined the RAF in 1999 as a medical cadet and has undertaken a variety of roles including deployments to both Iraq and Afghanistan. As a Wing Commander he was appointed as Officer Commanding Tactical Medical Wing in 2018, and then as Group Captain he served as Regional Clinical Director, Defence Primary Healthcare (DPHC) Northern Ireland Wales and West. In 2022 he was appointed Commanding Officer of the RAF Centre of Aviation Medicine, and then promoted to Air Commodore in Summer 2023 when he became Head Healthcare and Strategic Plans in HQ Defence Medical Services before being appointed Head of the Royal Air Force Medical Services and Head Health (RAF) in November 2024.

    As part of his role as Director Defence Healthcare, Air Commodore Ellison will be responsible for:

    • directing, overseeing and commissioning both primary and secondary military healthcare services in support of Defence outputs
    • directing, managing and delivering primary healthcare and dentistry service delivery in the UK and all overseas bases 

    • maximising the medical employability and deployability of Armed Forces personnel across Defence

    Air Commodore Darren Ellison said:

    It is an honour and a privilege to be appointed as the next Director Healthcare for the Defence Medical Services. I look forward to working with both the whole DMS team, and colleagues across the Military Commands, to shape and deliver a service that ensures our patients continue to receive the highest standard of safe, effective healthcare they rightly deserve, and we provide the critically enabling healthcare outputs that meet the current and future needs of Defence.

    Congratulating all three on their appointments, General Sir Jim Hockenhull, Commander Strategic Command (soon to be Cyber & Specialist Operations Command) said:

    I am delighted to see these three promotions within the Defence Medical Services.  Brigadier Philip Carter’s appointment as the next Surgeon General, on appointment to Major General, Brigadier Antony Finn’s appointment as the next Director Medical Personnel and Training, on appointment to Major General and Air Commodore Darren Ellison’s appointment as the next Director Defence Healthcare, on appointment to Air Vice-Marshal.  These selections will enable all to provide considerable support within DMS’s transformation journey and the implementation of the Strategic Defence Review (SDR), I look forward to working with them and congratulate them on their promotion.

    Director General of the Defence Medical Services, Air Marshal Clare Walton added:

    I am delighted to see the announcement of these three crucial appointments. Brigadier Phil Carter, Brigadier Tony Finn and Air Commodore Darren Ellison all have extensive experience gained from multiple roles in the Defence Medical Services and are exceptionally well-placed to take on these critical positions. At a time of global volatility, their leadership will be pivotal in driving the Strategic Defence Review (SDR) forward to implementation, shaping the medical capabilities of the future, and embedding the One Medical Mindset, ensuring that Armed Forces personnel remain fit to fight and are fully supported in their recovery to fitness.

    Updates to this page

    Published 24 July 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI China: Barcelona confirm Marcus Rashford loan signing

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    FC Barcelona confirmed the loan signing of England international forward Marcus Rashford from Manchester United on Wednesday with a video in which the player said the news was “official.”

    Rashford joins the La Liga and Copa del Rey champion on an initial one-season loan, with Barcelona having the option to make the move permanent for around 35 million euros. However, there is also a clause that means the club has to pay compensation if it opts against this.

    Manchester United’s Marcus Rashford (L) breaks through during the FA Cup quarterfinal match between Manchester United and Liverpool in Manchester, Britain, on March 17, 2024. (Xinhua)

    “What the club stands for means a lot for me. I feel like I am at home and a big factor in my choice to come here because it is a family place and a good place for good players to showcase their skills,” said Rashford at his presentation.

    “To be here is everything I wished and thought. I’m eager to get going and keep learning the Barcelona way as I go and be ready for the games,” he continued, adding that the chance to work with Barca coach Hansi Flick was another key reason for his decision.

    “What he did last season was terrific. In his career he’s proved he’s one of the top coaches, to lead such a young team to a very successful season,” commented the forward.

    The 27-year-old, who passed his medical tests in Barcelona on Monday, is rumored to have taken a 15 percent pay cut in order to complete the move after falling out of favor with United coach Ruben Amorim last season and spending the second half of the campaign on loan at Aston Villa.

    He will now form part of the squad that travels to Asia on Thursday to play matches in both South Korea and Japan.

    Rashford’s signing at Barcelona comes after the club suffered an embarrassing failure to sign Spain international Nico Williams from Athletic Bilbao for the second consecutive summer, with Williams opting to sign a new contract with Athletic.

    Meanwhile, efforts to bring in Colombian winger Luis Diaz were frustrated by Barca’s economic situation, which made it impossible for the club to get close to Liverpool’s demands.

    Rashford becomes the first English player to join FC Barcelona since Gary Lineker was at the club between 1986-1989 and only the second Englishman to play for them in over 100 years, with Harold Stamper the last previous Englishman after a season at Barcelona between 1922 and 1923.

    MIL OSI China News

  • From Gujarat to global: How PM Modi’s diaspora diplomacy took root in the UK

    Source: Government of India

    Source: Government of India (4)

    As Prime Minister Narendra Modi arrived in London on Wednesday, he was greeted by thunderous chants of “Modi Modi”, “Bharat Mata ki Jai”, and “Vande Mataram” from the Indian community — an emphatic reminder of a diplomatic tradition he initiated decades ago, long before rising to India’s highest political office.

    This growing emotional and strategic connect with the Indian diaspora has become a cornerstone of India’s foreign policy under PM Modi, especially during his second term.

    The foundations of this approach were laid as early as 1993, when Narendra Modi — then BJP’s General Secretary in Gujarat and an emerging national figure — made an impromptu stop in the UK on his return from the United States. Although the visit was unplanned and brief, Modi ensured he connected with the Indian diaspora in the UK. He visited media hubs like Sunrise Radio and the Gujarati newspaper Naya Padkar, interacted with families in Croydon and Hastings, engaged in informal conversations, rode the London Underground, and exchanged ideas with everyday Indians living in Britain.

    “The seeds planted then would quietly nourish India’s diaspora diplomacy for decades to come,” the Modi Archive said in a post on X, while sharing a timeline of the Prime Minister’s engagements in the UK.

    By 1999, when Modi had become a key national figure and the BJP’s global voice, he returned to the UK for a five-day visit in October, shortly after the BJP’s sweeping national electoral victory. Then serving as BJP’s National General Secretary, Modi had just delivered a stellar performance in Gujarat — winning 20 out of 26 Lok Sabha seats and expanding the party’s grassroots presence from 1,000 to over 16,000 village units between 1985 and 1995. This visit was highlighted by a landmark event at the Swaminarayan School in Neasden, organised by the Overseas Friends of BJP (UK). Despite a cold drizzle, the hall was packed.

    Notable attendees included Lord Navnit Dholakia, MP Barry Gardiner (Chairman of Labour Friends of India), and C.B. Patel, editor of Gujarat Samachar.

    “BJP stands for nationalism and patriotism,” Narendra Modi was quoted as saying by the Modi Archive.

    During this visit, he expanded on India’s democratic traditions, the NDA’s policy vision, and paid homage to Gandhian ideals — illustrating the BJP’s ideological clarity and moral purpose. He framed the BJP not just as a political force, but as a cultural and civilizational movement rooted in tradition, religion, modernity, and democracy. He further asserted that India’s democratic ethos is admired across the world.

    In addition, Modi was honoured by the Lohana Mahajan community, where he commended overseas Indians for serving as authentic ambassadors of Indian civilisation. He also paid a visit to 10 Downing Street during the trip.

    Modi’s emphasis on global awareness continued during another visit to the UK in 2000. In September that year, he stopped in London en route to the World Hindu Conference in the Caribbean and the UN Peace Summit in the US. At the time, he was about to assume the influential position of BJP General Secretary (Organisation), a role only two others had held since the Jana Sangh era.

    During this short visit, Modi met British Deputy Prime Minister John Prescott and engaged in serious discussions on political stability in Asia, India’s regional situation, and the growing threat of international terrorism. He also met with members of the Overseas Friends of BJP and held teleconferences with C.B. Patel, updating them on the state of affairs in Gujarat and national security efforts in Jammu and Kashmir.

    “Terrorism is an evil against humanity — whether in India, the Middle East, or Northern Ireland,” Modi said.

    It was a prescient warning that came a full year before the 9/11 attacks, at a time when much of the world had yet to perceive terrorism as a shared global menace.

    In August 2003, two years after the devastating Bhuj earthquake in Gujarat, Modi returned to the UK as Chief Minister of Gujarat.

    The purpose was to thank members of the Indian diaspora, many of whom had mobilised support, resources, and aid for the affected people.

    “You are all the real friends of Gujarat, and I have come to reciprocate the loyalty. We have slept in the street of death and today I have come to repay a debt of friendship to those who helped us in our hour of need,” Modi said, addressing thousands at the packed Wembley Conference Centre.

    He praised the diaspora not just for their financial contributions but for their deep emotional ties with India, calling them “the true friends of Gujarat”.

    During this visit, he also inaugurated the Shakti Hall at the Gujarat Samachar and Asian Voice offices. True to his style, he spoke not just of the past, but also of the future.

    In a speech still fondly remembered by the editors of Asian Voice, Modi famously said, “IT is not Information Technology. IT is India Today. BT is not Biotechnology. It is Bharat Today. IT and IT equals IT. That means Information Technology and Indian Talent is India Tomorrow.”

    The visit also included a meeting with then Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee, who was in London at the time. Modi later met a delegation of political leaders and diaspora members on the South Bank of the River Thames, near Westminster Bridge, opposite the iconic Houses of Parliament.

    Even in 2011, when Gujarat marked its golden jubilee, he virtually brought the UK into the celebrations. He addressed a high-profile audience in Mayfair, London, through video conferencing while in Gandhinagar, stating, “The name Gujarat and development are synonymous. Gujarat is creating history.”

    The event, hosted by Friends of Gujarat, Gujarat Samachar, and Asian Voice, brought together 90 distinguished guests including British MPs, Lords, and community leaders. Among them was Lord Gulam Noon, who had a direct and lively exchange with Modi.

    He used the opportunity to share his vision for the future. He announced the construction of the Mahatma Mandir, a monumental tribute rising from the soil of 18,000 villages — and including ‘mitti’ sent by Gujaratis living abroad.

    “In this Golden Jubilee celebration, we have decided to build a Mahatma Mandir. We have collected earth from 18,000 villages in Gujarat to make this monument. We have also collected earth from abroad, especially the UK,” he said.

    The message was clear: for Narendra Modi, the diaspora has never been a passive audience.

    It has always been, and continues to be, an integral part of India’s journey — a partner in progress and a powerful force in shaping India’s global image.

    Now, as Prime Minister of India, Narendra Modi continues to acknowledge and celebrate the contributions made by overseas Indians in deepening people-to-people ties and in promoting India’s image and influence across the globe.

    IANS

  • MIL-Evening Report: Jet ski accidents are tragic but preventable. Here’s how to reduce the risk

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Milad Haghani, Associate Professor & Principal Fellow in Urban Risk & Resilience, The University of Melbourne

    Richard Hamilton Smith/Getty

    Two teenage boys were thrown from a jet ski during a ride on the Georges River in Sydney’s south this week. One died at the scene. The other lost an arm, and was rushed to hospital in a serious condition.

    The exact cause of the crash is being investigated and a report will be prepared for the coroner.

    Sadly, this tragic incident is not isolated. While fatal jet ski crashes are relatively rare, serious injuries are not.

    Here’s what we know about jet ski accidents, who’s at risk, and how to prevent them.

    Jet skis are now more common

    Jet skis have become a familiar sight on Australian waterways, with sales peaking during the early years of the COVID pandemic. There are now almost 100,000 registered jet skis nationwide.

    So what was once a niche summer thrill has become a more mainstream recreational activity, particularly for young Australians.

    As the number of jet skis on our waterways grows, so too will the risks.

    How often do accidents happen?

    Most jet ski crashes occur in daylight hours, are twice as likely on weekends, and tend to spike during warmer months. Injuries typically happen close to shore (often within 50 metres) where crowded conditions increase the risk of colliding with other vessels, swimmers or fixed obstacles.

    Fatal jet ski accidents in Australia have claimed the lives of riders, passengers, swimmers and kayakers.

    Across New South Wales, Queensland and Victoria, there are up to three deaths per 100,000 licence holders. There are an estimated 19–26 serious injuries per 100,000 licence holders, depending on the state.

    But these figures likely understate the true picture as many non-fatal injuries go unreported unless hospitalised.

    For example, data from research sponsored by the United States Coast Guard suggest that for every moderate injury captured in accident reports, more than 30 actually occur. For every severe injury, it’s likely 1.65 actually occur.

    Who is at risk?

    Global jet ski statistics indicate about 85% of jet ski injuries involve male riders.

    Risk-taking behaviour and being an inexperienced rider are also risk factors, with young adults dominating injury statistics.

    One review found about 60% of jet ski crashes involved the rider drinking alcohol.

    What types of injuries?

    Recreational riders often typically travel at 60–80 kilometres per hour. But these machines can reach speeds above 100km/h. This can generate immense force in the event of a collision.

    In a crash, riders are ejected from the jet ski or collide directly with water, the craft, another vessel or fixed objects. So the leading causes of death and serious injury on jet skis are from these traumatic impacts.

    A study from a US trauma centre looked at 127 people injured in jet ski incidents and found most injuries involved broken bones. The legs were most commonly affected, followed by arms, spine and hips.

    Hitting the handlebars was a major cause of open fractures (when a broken bone pierces the skin), some of which later became infected.

    Women and children face particular risks

    However, there is a distinct and concerning injury pattern for female passengers.

    Women riding on the back of a jet ski (as a passenger) are especially at risk of serious injuries to the genital and anal area. This can happen if they fall off backwards and land directly on the powerful stream of water coming from the jet nozzle.

    Case reports describe incidents of vaginal lacerations, rectal injuries and pelvic floor damage. Such injuries are rare but can be devastating and life-threatening. Sometimes there are permanent complications, such as the risk of infertility or incontinence.

    Children also face unique and often severe risks. A US study looked at 66 children hospitalised in jet ski accidents. It found most were boys with the average age of around 12 years old, and nearly three-quarters operated the jet ski themselves. About 70% of injuries involved collisions with another vessel or object. Four children died, all from head trauma after crashing into stationary objects. More than 40% were left with some degree of disability.

    What now?

    The risks from jet skis are real and too often underestimated. But many injuries can be prevented:

    • we need public education campaigns to remind riders of the risks and to promote better behaviour. This would remind riders to slow down in congested areas, avoid reckless turns, and be especially careful with passengers. As alcohol is a common factor in crashes, drinking in moderation before riding should also be stressed

    • women are recommended to wear neoprene protective shorts, or wetsuits, instead of ordinary swimwear. A growing number of medical professionals are now backing this as essential safety gear, not optional, to reduce the risk of perineal injuries from water jets

    • manufacturers can redesign handlebars to reduce the severity of impact injuries. They can also build in safeguards that reduce jet pressure when no one is seated at the rear (to safeguard the health of a passenger who falls off backwards)

    • states also need consistent rules on minimum rider age, training and licensing. The laws vary widely. These inconsistent regulations create confusion and loopholes, especially when riders cross borders.

    The authors do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Jet ski accidents are tragic but preventable. Here’s how to reduce the risk – https://theconversation.com/jet-ski-accidents-are-tragic-but-preventable-heres-how-to-reduce-the-risk-261746

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Highway safety blitz catches speeding drivers

    Source: New South Wales Community and Justice

    Highway safety blitz catches speeding drivers

    Thursday, 24 July 2025 – 11:11 am.

    Tasmania Police issued 24 drivers with speeding infringements during a four-hour road safety blitz on the Bass Highway on Wednesday.
    Officers from Western and Northern Road Policing Services conducted the joint operation on the highway, between Westbury and Latrobe, between 8am and noon.
    Police detected 24 speeding offences, including five drivers travelling 20km/h to 30km/h over the posted speed limit. There was also one unregistered and uninsured vehicle.
    Western District Acting Inspector Martin Parker said the higher range speeding offences were committed near the Paramatta Creek weigh bridge, where the speed limit had been reduced to 80km/h due to officers from the National Heavy Vehicle Regulator conducting operations at the weigh bridge.
    “It is concerning that motorists are disregarding highly visual speed reduction signs when the weigh bridge station was operating,” Acting Inspector Parker said.
    “The speed limit had been reduced to allow NVHR officers to safely conduct their work and the safe flow of traffic in the area, when trucks are exiting and re-entering the highway.”
    Tasmania Police is committed to continuing road safety activities with the aim to reduce crashes on our roads, particularly serious and fatal crashes.
    One death or serious injury is one too many and has the potential to severely impact the community.
    Incidents of dangerous driving can be reported to police on 131 444 or call triple zero (000) if the behaviour is life threatening. Reports can also be made via Crime Stoppers Tasmania on 1800 333 000 or at crimestopperstas.com.au. Information can be provided anonymously.

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Man charged with serious family violence offences

    Source: New South Wales Community and Justice

    Man charged with serious family violence offences

    Thursday, 24 July 2025 – 10:06 am.

    A 43-year-old Risdon man has been charged with serious family violence offences following an operation led by Tasmania Police’s South East Criminal Investigation Branch (CIB).
    The offences include emotional abuse (coercive control), systems abuse, and numerous family violence order breaches.
    As part of the investigative operation, several coordinated searches were conducted at a range of locations on Wednesday, with exhibits seized and the man charged on Wednesday evening.
    Supporting and protecting victims of crime is a priority for Tasmania Police, and this matter remains under active investigation.
    The man is due to appear in the Hobart Magistrates Court on 5 December 2025.
    If you or someone you know is experiencing family violence and is in need of urgent assistance, call police on Triple Zero (000).
    To report a non-urgent incident of family violence – call the Tasmania Police Assistance Line on 131 444 or attend your local police station to make a report. If you have a hearing impairment, call TTY 106.
    For advice, support and counselling relating to family violence (if you do not wish to report the matter to police in the first instance) – call the Family Violence Counselling Support Service on 1800 608 122.

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: £30 million to decarbonise shipping, boost careers and deliver growth across the UK

    Source: United Kingdom – Government Statements

    Press release

    £30 million to decarbonise shipping, boost careers and deliver growth across the UK

    Funding will be crucial in supporting the green fuels and technologies of the future, so we can clean up sea travel and trade.

    • coastal communities across the UK will benefit from £30 million to make shipping and sea travel greener, boosting local economies, and supporting jobs and skills
    • decarb funding is helping to revitalise Glasgow’s strong shipbuilding heritage, as Maritime Minister heralds a new Scottish-built high-tech wing sail which can save ships up to 40% per annum in fuel and emissions
    • latest boost builds on over £136 million for already delivered to more than 142 organisations across every region in the UK, delivering on the government’s Plan for Change missions to kickstart economic growth and become a clean energy superpower.

    Coastal communities across the UK are to benefit from £30 million funding to decarbonise shipping and power up local economies the Maritime Minister will announce today (24 July 2025) during a visit to Clydeport in Glasgow.

    Awarded from the sixth round of the Clean Maritime Demonstration Competition (CMDC), successful companies will be given a share of funding to support the development of clean maritime fuels and technologies such as ammonia, hydrogen, methanol, solar and electric. 

    Investment in green fuels not only supports the decarbonisation of shipping, helping cement the UK as a clean energy superpower, it also revitalises coastal communities by growing local economies and boosting jobs and skills.   

    CMDC has provided over £136 million funding to date to 142 organisations, as part of the wider UK SHORE funding – the government’s flagship programme dedicated to decarbonising maritime – for over 300 organisations, including 250 SMEs. Successful projects include the installation of electric chargepoint networks across ports, including at Aberdeen, the demonstration of an electric crew transfer vessel at Aberdeen Offshore Wind Farm, and the demonstration of a green hydrogen shore power system at the port of Leith. 

    Maritime Minister Mike Kane said:  

    It’s so exciting to see investment in green fuels and technologies spurring on skills, innovation and manufacturing across the UK, delivering on our Plan for Change missions to kickstart economic growth and become a clean energy superpower.

    We’ve charted a course to net zero shipping by 2050 and this £30 million will be crucial in supporting the green fuels and technologies of the future, so we can clean up sea travel and trade.

    During his visit to Clydeport, the minister will meet with workers from the National Manufacturing Institute Scotland, which is looking to help Smart Green Shipping scale up the manufacturing of the FastRig windsail going forward. Built nearby in Glasgow, the FastRig is a high-tech wing sail which can be installed onto vessels, reducing fuel use and emissions by up to 40% per annum. The project received £3.3 million from the third round of the CMDC and has now been successfully deployed at sea. 

    Chris Courtney, CEO, National Manufacturing Institute Scotland said:

    Clean maritime is a vital part of a wider mission to decarbonise transport. Advanced manufacturing is critical to enable companies to scale up novel solutions that deliver emissions reductions and allow the creation of new jobs in these industries of the future.

    We’ve spent the past 2 years working on the CMDC-funded MariLight projects, led by Glasgow-based Malin Marine Consultants, part of the Malin Group, supported by industry partners, where we demonstrated how advanced manufacturing can cut lead times, lower carbon, and enable localised production in shipbuilding. It’s great to see continued momentum through the programme, and we look forward to supporting Smart Green Shipping’s journey as it scales.

    Diane Gilpin, Smart Green Shipping (SGS), CEO said:

    CMDC3 support enabled SGS, a Scottish based business, to demonstrate the safety and robustness of FastRig, our Cyldebuilt wingsails, and to build out our digital decision-making platform, FastReach, which underpins our unique wind-as-a-service proposition.

    Over the last 3 years SGS has invested £7.6 million in R&D, 60% of that in Scotland. We’ve drawn upon engineering design skills in adjacent sectors like renewables and oil and gas, and digital expertise created in Scotland’s vibrant tech community. We are also working alongside the National Manufacturing Institute of Scotland to design circular manufacturing solutions to reduce embedded emissions and minimise use of precious materials while creating good green jobs as part of a sustainable just transition.

    The minister will meet with Peel Ports and local workers at Clydeport’s King George V Docks. Delivering £3 million of investment to support the growing demand for handling huge wind turbine components for the renewable energy sector, Clydeport is keeping Glasgow’s shipbuilding heritage and manufacturing expertise alive, equipping it to meet the modern-day needs of the sector. 

    Jim McSporran, Port Director at Peel Ports Clydeport, said:

    We’re proud to welcome the Maritime Minister to Peel Ports Clydeport today and showcase how our facilities continue to create opportunities for investment, jobs and skills that will benefit the people and businesses of Scotland. 

    Our recent £3 million investment in road infrastructure at King George V Dock to accommodate growing demand for handling wind turbine components, and our ongoing transformative work at Hunterston PARC in Ayrshire to support the renewables sector, demonstrate our commitment to decarbonising supply chains and enabling the transition to a greener economy.  

    It’s fantastic to see government and industry working together to back innovation and today’s visit reinforces how Glasgow’s maritime legacy is helping to drive the UK’s clean energy future.

    Mike Biddle, Executive Director, Net Zero at Innovate UK, said:

    Congratulations to the awarded projects from Round 6 of the Clean Maritime Demonstrator Competition – a great opportunity for UK innovators to take part in a world-renowned maritime transport R&D grant funding programme. Innovate UK looks forward to working with partners to support these projects focused on the ever-more prevalent issue of decarbonisation with emphasis on a range of physical, digital, system and skills-based innovation.

    Building on its commitment to clean up shipping and deliver on the UK’s climate ambitions, UK SHORE is also delivering £3.85 million to the Clean Maritime Research Hub. Formed from a consortium of 13 universities across the UK, dedicated to conducting scientific research in clean maritime, the funding will enable the hub to continue its important research, and support the installation of a liquid hydrogen facility at Durham University. The centre will develop the maritime sector’s understanding of the potential impact of liquid hydrogen – which is emission free – in the clean maritime transition.

    Maritime media enquiries

    Media enquiries 0300 7777 878

    Switchboard 0300 330 3000

    Updates to this page

    Published 24 July 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Historic trade deal signed with India to deliver £50 million boost to Northern Ireland

    Source: United Kingdom – Government Statements

    Press release

    Historic trade deal signed with India to deliver £50 million boost to Northern Ireland

    New analysis published today [Thursday 24 July] shows the landmark agreement will deliver a £50m boost to the local economy

    • NEW figures show trade deal with India will deliver £50 million for Northern Ireland’s economy as part of the Plan for Change 

    • Advanced manufacturing and engineering, whiskey producers and services and technology sectors set to benefit from growth following a reduction or near elimination of tariffs 

    • Comes as Prime Minister and Trade Secretary welcome Prime Minister Modi and Commerce Minister to UK for signing of most comprehensive deal India has ever agreed 

    Businesses and workers in Northern Ireland are set to benefit from the UK’s trade deal with India, as new analysis published today [Thursday 24 July] shows the landmark agreement will deliver a £50m boost to the local economy as part of the Plan for Change. 

    The Prime Minister will meet his counterpart Narendra Modi this morning for the trade deal signing as Business and Trade Secretary Jonathan Reynolds and Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal put pen to paper on the landmark agreement. It comes as a series of investment and export wins have been confirmed by UK and Indian businesses, representing an overall boost of nearly £6 billion and creating over 2,200 jobs. 

    India is a growing market for Northern Ireland businesses, 143 of which exported a total of £65 million in goods there last year– this could grow even more thanks to lower tariffs, fewer barriers to trade, and easier customs. 

    Advanced manufacturing and engineering – which represent approximately 30 per cent of employment in Northern Ireland – will benefit from removal or reduction of tariffs.  

    Northern Ireland’s medical technology sector will benefit from tariffs on a range of medical devices, between 8.25% to 13.75% being eliminated or halved within ten years.

    Duties on Irish whiskey will immediately fall from 150% to 75%, dropping further to 40% over ten years. Producers will also be able to use Irish barley or neutral grain spirit and bottle products in transit to India, maximising capability to capitalise on tariff reductions. 

      Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, Hilary Benn, said:  

    This is a landmark deal that will bring real benefits for businesses and workers in Northern Ireland.  

    Northern Ireland’s advanced manufacturing, engineering, and medical technology sectors will see tariffs eliminated or significantly reduced, while Irish whiskey producers will benefit from substantial cuts in duties allowing for increased trade with India.

    This agreement will help further unlock the huge potential for growth across Northern Ireland, including its thriving services and technology sectors.

    Business and Trade Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said: 

    The millions brought to Northern Ireland each year from the deal we’ve signed with India today will be keenly felt across local communities, whether that’s higher wages for workers, more choice for shoppers, or increased overseas sales for businesses. 

    This government is proving time and again that we can deliver on our mission to grow the economy, put more money in pockets and boost living standards under our Plan for Change.

    Philip McKee, Sales Manager at Biopanda, a Belfast-based medtech manufacturer which exports in vitro test kits for clinical laboratories, veterinary practice, and food safety laboratories, said:   

    Biopanda have been supplying a range of diagnostic products to the Indian market throughout the past ten years. We value the business we have done already throughout India and with the introduction of the UK-India FTA this should benefit in increased trade with the removal of export barriers.  

    This will hopefully increase the market access, allowing our distributors throughout India to provide a larger range of our highly accurate clinical diagnostic products at a lower price to the consumer. 

    Workers in Northern Ireland will enjoy an uplift in pay as UK wages grow by a total £2.2 billion each year, and could also see cheaper prices and more choice on clothes, shoes, and food products. The UK already imports £11 billion in goods from India but liberalised tariffs on Indian goods will make it easier and cheaper to buy their best products. 

    For businesses in Northern Ireland this could mean potential savings when importing components and materials used in areas such as advanced manufacturing or luxury and consumer goods. 

    India’s trade weighted average tariff will drop from 15% to 3% which means Northern Ireland companies selling products to India from whiskey, and soft drinks to cosmetics and medical devices will find it easier to sell to the Indian market. It gives the UK an advantage over international competitors in reaching the Indian market, forecast to have over a quarter of a billion high income consumers by 2050. 

    Aligned with the UK’s recent Industrial and Trade Strategies, the deal will support the sectors which drive the most growth for the economy. In Northern Ireland, sectors such as agriculture and food, advanced manufacturing and engineering, and the services and technology sectors are expected to benefit substantially. 

    Notes to editor 

    • The government will prepare for the trade agreement to be ratified by Parliament so businesses can begin to use it.
    • For more information on the Double Contribution Convention, please see the policy explainer attached.
    • Headline economic estimates of the impact of the FTA along with the methodology were previously set out in the technical notes for the preliminary estimates. The full detailed impact assessment, using the same methodology, will be published shortly.

    Updates to this page

    Published 24 July 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Woman charged with arson in relation to fire which destroyed unit at Ravenswood

    Source: New South Wales Community and Justice

    Woman charged with arson in relation to fire which destroyed unit at Ravenswood

    Thursday, 24 July 2025 – 8:48 am.

    Police have charged a 61-year-old woman from Ravenswood with arson in relation to a fire at Ravenswood yesterday.  
    Around 10.30am, emergency services responded to reports of a unit on fire on Warring Street.  
    Tasmania Fire Service extinguished the fire; however the unit was destroyed.  
    Fire Investigators determined the fire was deliberately lit.  
    The woman was bailed to appear before the Launceston Magistrates Court on 3 September 2025.

    MIL OSI News

  • 4th Test: Sudharsan’s 61 takes India to 264/4 against England, Pant suffers foot

    Source: Government of India

    Source: Government of India (4)

    Bad light forced an early end to Day One of the fourth Test of the Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy series at Old Trafford, with India reaching 264/4 in 83 overs, largely due to B Sai Sudharsan’s impressive 61 – his first Test fifty. 

    Brought back into the playing XI in place of Karun Nair, Sudharsan had a nervy start and was even dropped on 20. But the left-handed batter recovered well, striking seven boundaries in his 151-ball knock on a hard pitch under overcast skies.

    Yashasvi Jaiswal scored a gritty 58 while sharing a 94-run opening stand with KL Rahul, who made 46. However, India’s biggest concern will be Rishabh Pant’s foot injury, which forced him to retire hurt on 37. After taking a nasty blow and developing significant swelling, Pant was sent for scans, and the extent of his participation could influence the outcome of the match.

    In the morning, Ben Stokes won the toss for the fourth time and opted to bowl first. Initially, Jaiswal rode his luck as Chris Woakes repeatedly beat his outside edge. However, the veteran all-rounder couldn’t find the breakthrough in his marathon eight-over spell, with Jaiswal taking three boundaries off him, while Rahul hit two.

    When Brydon Carse came on, Rahul cut him twice for fours, and Jaiswal pierced the gap between third slip and gully. Rahul, who surpassed 400 runs in the series, faced more deliveries from Archer than Jaiswal, who had twice fallen to the pacer at Lord’s.

    After cutting Stokes for four, Jaiswal got a lucky edge off Archer for another boundary before upper-cutting the England captain for six. He and Rahul ensured India went to lunch without losing a wicket.

    The second session began with Jaiswal slashing and punching Carse for a pair of boundaries, before Woakes was finally rewarded for his persistence. On the last ball of the 30th over, a back-of-a-length delivery nipped away and took a thick outside edge from Rahul’s attempted punch, and Zak Crawley held on at third slip. Rahul departed for 46, ending the 94-run opening stand.

    Jaiswal went on to record his 12th Test fifty but fell soon after the drinks break. Liam Dawson, making his Test comeback after eight years, claimed his first wicket on just his seventh delivery. Jaiswal, attempting a forward defence, edged to Harry Brook at first slip and was dismissed for 58.

    Dawson, playing in place of the injured Shoaib Bashir, managed to tie Sudharsan down. Sudharsan could have fallen on 20 if Jamie Smith hadn’t missed a leg-side chance off Stokes.

    However, Stokes struck in his next over when Shubman Gill left an in-ducker that rapped him on the pads. After being adjudged out by on-field umpire Rod Tucker, Gill reviewed, but replays showed the ball clipping the top of off-stump. He walked off for 12, giving England a boost after a wicketless first session.

    In the final session, Sudharsan hooked Archer through fine leg for four, then pulled another for a boundary. Pant stunned the crowd with a front-foot sweep off Archer for four, followed by an audacious reverse ramp. He also launched Carse for a six over long-on, as he and Sudharsan brought up a counter-attacking 50-run stand and helped India cross 200.

    However, disaster struck in the 68th over when Pant attempted a reverse sweep off Woakes but under-edged the ball onto his right foot. Though England reviewed for lbw and lost it, Pant was clearly in pain. The swelling on his foot ballooned to the size of a table tennis ball, and he was eventually taken off the field in a buggy, retiring hurt on 37 after a 72-run stand with Sudharsan.

    Sudharsan went on to bring up his maiden Test fifty in 174 balls with a crisp drive through cover off Joe Root. But Stokes’ short-ball tactic worked once again, as Sudharsan, cramped for room, top-edged a pull to long leg – the third time he’s been dismissed by Stokes in this series.

    With bad light forcing England to bowl spin from both ends, Ravindra Jadeja and Shardul Thakur, both unbeaten on 19, added three boundaries between them before play was called off, concluding a see-saw day of Test cricket.

    Brief scores:

    India 264/4 in 83 overs (B Sai Sudharsan 61, Yashasvi Jaiswal 58; Ben Stokes 2-47, Chris Woakes 1-43) vs England

    —IANS

     

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Prime Minister secures thousands of British jobs and £6 billion in investment and export wins as historic trade deal with India signed

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Press release

    Prime Minister secures thousands of British jobs and £6 billion in investment and export wins as historic trade deal with India signed

    Today, the Prime Minister will welcome nearly £6 billion in new investment and export wins.

    • Thousands of jobs created for Brits through new Indian investment and export wins worth almost £6 billion
    • New figures show that £4.8bn trade deal will unlock economic growth for each region and nation of the UK – delivering on the government’s Plan for Change
    • UK and India also agree to ramp up joint efforts against organised crime and illegal migration with new framework to tackle trafficking, document fraud and remove barriers to return

    Today, the Prime Minister will welcome nearly £6 billion in new investment and export wins, which will create over 2,200 British jobs across the country as Indian firms expand their operations in the UK and British companies secure new business opportunities in India. These deals will drive jobs in high-growth sectors like aerospace, technology and advanced manufacturing – supporting engineers, technicians and supply chain workers, in every corner of the UK.

    It comes as the Prime Minister is set to meet the Prime Minister of India, Narendra Modi, today for the signing of the landmark UK-India trade deal. From Coventry to Carlisle, new analysis shows communities across every region of the UK will benefit from its £4.8 billion increase to UK GDP each year.

    Thanks to the deal, British workers will enjoy a collective uplift in wages of £2.2 billion each year and could also see cheaper prices and more choice on clothes, shoes, and food products.

    The UK already imports £11 billion in goods from India, but liberalised tariffs on Indian goods will make it easier and cheaper to buy their best products. For businesses, this could mean potential savings when importing components and materials used in areas such as advanced manufacturing or luxury and consumer goods.

    Prime Minister Keir Starmer said:

    Our landmark trade deal with India is a major win for Britain. It will create thousands of British jobs across the UK, unlock new opportunities for businesses and drive growth in every corner of the country, delivering on our Plan for Change.

    We’re putting more money in the pockets of hardworking Brits and helping families with the cost of living, and we’re determined to go further and faster to grow the economy and raise living standards across the UK.

    India’s average tariff on UK products will drop from 15% to 3% which means British companies selling products to India from soft drinks and cosmetics to cars and medical devices will find it easier to sell to the Indian market.

    Whisky producers will benefit from tariffs slashed in half, reduced immediately from 150% to 75% and then dropped even further to 40% over the next ten years – giving the UK an advantage over international competitors in reaching the Indian market.

    Business and Trade Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said:

    The billions brought to our economy from the trade deal signed today will reach all regions and nations of the UK so working people in every community can feel the benefits.

    The almost £6 billion in new investment and export wins announced today will deliver thousands of jobs and shows the strength of our partnership with India as we ensure the UK is the best place in the world to invest and do business.

    This government is proving time and again that we can deliver on our mission to grow the economy, put more money in pockets and boost living standards under our Plan for Change.

    The two Prime Ministers have also signed a renewed Comprehensive and Strategic Partnership, which will see closer collaboration on defence, education, climate, technology and innovation. This comes exactly one year since the countries signed the landmark UK-India Technology Security Initiative, which sees joint work on telecoms security and unlocking investment across emerging technologies – telecoms, critical minerals, AI, quantum, health/bio tech, advanced materials and semiconductors.

    The UK and India have also agreed to strengthen cooperation in tackling corruption, serious fraud, organised crime, and irregular migration through enhanced intelligence sharing and operational collaboration. This includes committing to finalising a groundbreaking new criminal records sharing agreement, facilitating the exchange of criminal records to support criminal proceedings, maintain accurate watchlists and enable the enforcement of travel bans. These measures represent a significant step forward in joint efforts to combat organised immigration crime.

    Aligned with the UK’s recent Industrial and Trade Strategies, the deal will support the sectors which drive the most growth for the economy. The UK’s large and varied manufacturing sectors will benefit from tariffs cut on aerospace (as high as 11% reduced to 0%), automotives (up to 110% down to 10% under a quota) and electrical machinery (from up to 22% down to either 0% of a 50% reduction).

    A reduction in tariffs, combined with a reduction in regulatory barriers to trade between the UK and India are estimated to:

    • Increase UK exports to India by nearly 60% in the long run – this is equivalent to an additional £15.7 billion of UK exports to India when applied to projections of future trade in 2040.

    • Increase bilateral trade by nearly 39% in the long run, equivalent to £25.5 billion a year, when compared to 2040 projected levels of trade in the absence of an agreement

    The clean energy industry will have brand new, unprecedented access to India’s vast procurement market as the country makes the switch to renewable energy and continues to see growing energy demand.  

    For financial and professional business services, locked in access will offer certainty to expand in India’s growing market and measures such as binding India’s foreign investment cap for the insurance sector, ensuring UK financial services companies are treated on an equal footing with domestic suppliers. 

    Meanwhile, 26 British companies have secured new business in India. Airbus & Rolls-Royce will soon begin delivering Airbus aircraft – with over half powered by Rolls-Royce engines – to major Indian airlines as part of around £5 billion worth of contracts recently agreed. These orders will help sustain hundreds of jobs across their respective sites in Filton, Broughton and Derby. 

    18 firms have confirmed new investment including Zerowatt Energy, AI powered energy intelligence platform is setting up its Global HQ in Leicester. The firm will invest £10m and create 50 new jobs across Leicester, Manchester, Edinburgh and London over the next three years. 

    Other UK and Indian businesses who have confirmed almost £6 billion in new investments and export deals today creating over 2,200 jobs across the UK includes:  

    • Carbon Clean, a UK-based leader in carbon capture, with projected UK export contributions of £83 million over the next five years, has invested £7.6 million in a Global Innovation Centre in Mumbai. This ODI and export wins will unlock 250 jobs across London, Glasgow and Huddersfield as well as 100 jobs in Mumbai. 
    • AI and data services company, DCube AI, is investing £5 million in the UK, unlocking 50 jobs across Manchester and London in the next three years to strength its technology offering to UK customers.
    • Occuity, an innovative UK AI healthcare company has partnered with Remidio Innovative Solutions Pvt. Ltd., a leading Indian manufacturer and distributor of ophthalmic medical devices to bring Occuity’ s cutting-edge ophthalmic screening technologies to India, improving access to innovative and non-invasive eye screening and leading to an export value of £74.3 million over 5 years. 
    • Johnson Matthey, a UK-based leader in chemicals and sustainable technologies, has secured recent contracts of over £20 million for process licensing, engineering, and catalysts supply in India. The company will also invest £4 million in a new plant at Taloja (Maharashtra) and in doubling its capacity at an existing site in Panki, Uttar Pradesh, with contracts are helping to create up to 20,000 jobs in India during the construction phase of these projects.
    • Marcus Evans Group, a global business intelligence and summits business company established its new Global Technology office in Mumbai to serve its 59 offices worldwide and has confirmed a combined Export (£42mn) and ODI (£27mn) win of £69 million over the next five years from India. 
    • LTIMindtree , a global technology consulting and digital solutions company plans to further expand its London operations by adding over 300 highly skilled jobs, investing £1m. This includes a state-of-the-art AI innovation studio and showcase lab. 
    • Aurionpro, a global enterprise technology leader in Banking, Payments, Insurance, Data Centers, and Public Sector technology is investing over £20M to launch its UK HQ, creating 150+ high-value jobs in multiple locations across UK over 3 years. It will also open AI-powered R&D labs in collaboration with top UK universities to develop next-gen transport technology and lead the global Safe Superintelligence (SSI) movement, ensuring AI is built safely and ethically.

    Tufan Erginbiligic, Rolls-Royce CEO, said:

    India is an important market for our business, with over 90 years of partnership with Indian industry and the Indian Government. We welcome the provisions in this Free Trade Agreement, including those that bring closer alignment with international standards for trade in civil aerospace. These agreements will benefit Rolls-Royce and our customers, paving the way for future aerospace growth in India.

    Nik Jhangiani, Interim Chief Executive, Diageo, said:

    This agreement marks a great moment for both Scotch and Scotland, and we’ll be raising a glass of Johnnie Walker to all those who have worked so hard to get it secured.

    William Bain, Head of Trade Policy at the BCC, said:

    The signing of this agreement is a clear signal of the UK’s continuing commitment to free and fair trade. It will open a new era for our businesses and boost investment between two of the world’s largest economies.   

    Currently around 16,000 UK companies are trading goods with Indian companies, and there is high interest in our Chamber Network to grow that.  This deal will create new opportunities in the transport, travel, creative and business support sectors alongside traditional strengths in finance and professional services.

    Jean-Etienne Gourgues, Chivas Brothers Chairman and CEO, said:

    Signature of the UK-India FTA is a sign of hope in challenging times for the spirits industry.  India is the world’s biggest whisky market by volume and greater access will be an eventual game changer for the export of our Scotch whisky brands, such as Chivas Regal and Ballantine’s.  

    The deal will support long term investment and jobs in our distilleries in Speyside and our bottling plant at Kilmalid and help deliver growth in both Scotland and India over the next decade. Let’s hope that both governments will move quickly to ratification so business can get to work implementing the deal!

    Updates to this page

    Published 23 July 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI: Brookline Bancorp Announces Second Quarter Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Net Income of $22.0 million, EPS of $0.25

    Quarterly Dividend of $0.135

    BOSTON, July 23, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Brookline Bancorp, Inc. (NASDAQ: BRKL) (the “Company”) today announced net income of $22.0 million, or $0.25 per basic and diluted share, for the second quarter of 2025, compared to net income of $19.1 million, or $0.21 per basic and diluted share, for the first quarter of 2025, and $16.4 million, or $0.18 per basic and diluted share, for the second quarter of 2024. The Company reported operating earnings after tax (non-GAAP) of $22.4 million, or $0.25 per basic and diluted share, for the second quarter of 2025, compared to operating earnings after tax (non-GAAP) of $20.0 million, or $0.22 per basic and diluted share, for the first quarter of 2025, and $17.0 million, or $0.19 per basic and diluted share, for the second quarter of 2024.

    Commenting on the second quarter’s performance, Mr. Perrault stated, “We are pleased to report solid earnings for the second quarter of the year led by growth in our C&I portfolio and deposits. Our dedicated team of bankers continue to provide exceptional service to the communities we serve. As a result of these efforts, our net interest margin expanded again this quarter despite intentional contraction in our commercial real estate portfolio.”

    BALANCE SHEET

    Total assets at June 30, 2025 were $11.6 billion, representing an increase of $48.9 million from $11.5 billion at March 31, 2025, primarily driven by an increase in cash and cash equivalents partially offset by a reduction of loans and leases. Total assets decreased $66.5 million from June 30, 2024.

    At June 30, 2025, total loans and leases were $9.6 billion, representing a decrease of $60.3 million from March 31, 2025, and a decrease of $138.8 million from June 30, 2024.

    Total investment securities at June 30, 2025 decreased $15.7 million to $866.7 million from $882.4 million at March 31, 2025, and increased $10.3 million from $856.4 million at June 30, 2024. Total cash and cash equivalents at June 30, 2025 increased $149.2 million to $506.7 million from $357.5 million at March 31, 2025, and increased $163.6 million from $343.1 million at June 30, 2024. As of June 30, 2025, total investment securities and total cash and cash equivalents represented 11.9 percent of total assets, compared to 10.8 percent and 10.3 percent as of March 31, 2025 and June 30, 2024, respectively.

    Total deposits at June 30, 2025 increased $49.8 million to $9.0 billion from March 31, 2025, primarily driven by an increase of $58.3 million in customer deposits partially offset by a decline of $8.5 million in brokered deposits. Total deposits increased $224.2 million from $8.7 billion at June 30, 2024, primarily driven by an increase of $391.2 million in customer deposits partially offset by a decline of $167.0 million in brokered deposits.

    Total borrowed funds at June 30, 2025 remained flat at $1.2 billion compared to March 31, 2025, and decreased $274.4 million from $1.4 billion at June 30, 2024.

    The ratio of stockholders’ equity to total assets was 10.84 percent at June 30, 2025, as compared to 10.77 percent at March 31, 2025, and 10.30 percent at June 30, 2024. The ratio of tangible stockholders’ equity to tangible assets (non-GAAP) was 8.82 percent at June 30, 2025, as compared to 8.73 percent at March 31, 2025, and 8.23 percent at June 30, 2024. Tangible book value per common share (non-GAAP) increased $0.17 from $11.03 at March 31, 2025 to $11.20 at June 30, 2025, and increased $0.67 from $10.53 at June 30, 2024.

    NET INTEREST INCOME

    Net interest income increased $2.9 million to $88.7 million during the second quarter of 2025 from $85.8 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2025. The net interest margin increased 10 basis points to 3.32 percent for the three months ended June 30, 2025 from 3.22 percent for the three months ended March 31, 2025, primarily driven by lower funding costs and higher yields on loans and leases.

    NON-INTEREST INCOME

    Total non-interest income for the quarter ended June 30, 2025 increased $0.3 million to $6.0 million from $5.7 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2025. The increase was primarily driven by an increase of $0.2 million in gain on sales of loans and leases.

    PROVISION FOR CREDIT LOSSES

    The Company recorded a provision for credit losses of $7.0 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2025, compared to $6.0 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2025. The increase in provision was driven by a combination of continued stress in the Boston office sector as well as additional specific reserves on two large Eastern Funding credits.

    Total net charge-offs for the second quarter of 2025 were $5.1 million, compared to $7.6 million in the first quarter of 2025. The $5.1 million in net charge-offs was driven by two commercial real estate loans that were sold during the quarter resulting in a combined $3.5 million in net charge-offs. The ratio of net loan and lease charge-offs to average loans and leases on an annualized basis decreased to 21 basis points for the second quarter of 2025 from 31 basis points for the first quarter of 2025.

    The allowance for loan and lease losses represented 1.32 percent of total loans and leases at June 30, 2025, compared to 1.29 percent at March 31, 2025, and 1.25 percent at June 30, 2024.

    ASSET QUALITY

    The ratio of nonperforming loans and leases to total loans and leases was 0.65 percent at June 30, 2025, flat compared to March 31, 2025. Total nonaccrual loans and leases decreased $0.8 million to $62.3 million at June 30, 2025 from $63.1 million at March 31, 2025, driven by the sale of two commercial real estate loans. The ratio of nonperforming assets to total assets was 0.55 percent at June 30, 2025, a decrease from 0.56 percent at March 31, 2025. Total nonperforming assets decreased $0.4 million to $63.6 million at June 30, 2025 from $64.0 million at March 31, 2025.

    NON-INTEREST EXPENSE

    Non-interest expense for the quarter ended June 30, 2025 decreased $1.9 million to $58.1 million from $60.0 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2025. The decrease was primarily driven by decreases of $0.7 million in compensation and employee benefits expense, $0.5 million in merger and acquisition expense related to the previously announced proposed merger of the Company with Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. (“Berkshire”), and $0.4 million in occupancy expense, partially offset by an increase of $0.5 million in advertising and marketing expense.

    PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES

    The effective tax rate was 25.6 percent and 25.3 percent for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025 compared to 25.0 percent for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 24.4 percent and 24.5 percent for the three and six months ended June 30, 2024.

    RETURNS ON AVERAGE ASSETS AND AVERAGE EQUITY

    The annualized return on average assets increased to 0.77 percent during the second quarter 2025 from 0.66 percent for the first quarter of 2025.

    The annualized return on average stockholders’ equity increased to 7.04 percent during the second quarter of 2025 from 6.19 percent for the first quarter of 2025. The annualized return on average tangible stockholders’ equity (non-GAAP) increased to 8.85 percent for the second quarter of 2025 from 7.82 percent for the first quarter of 2025.

    DIVIDEND DECLARED

    The Company’s Board of Directors approved a dividend of $0.135 per share for the quarter ended June 30, 2025. The dividend will be paid on August 22, 2025 to stockholders of record on August 8, 2025.

    CONFERENCE CALL

    The Company will conduct a conference call/webcast at 1:30 PM Eastern Time on Thursday, July 24, 2025 to discuss the results for the quarter, business highlights and outlook. A copy of the Earnings Presentation is available on the Company’s website, www.brooklinebancorp.com. To listen to the call and view the Company’s Earnings Presentation, please join the call via https://events.q4inc.com/attendee/149362707. To listen to the call without access to the slides, interested parties may dial 833-470-1428 (United States) or 404-975-4839 (internationally) and ask for the Brookline Bancorp, Inc. conference call (Access Code 673409). A recorded playback of the call will be available for one week following the call on the Company’s website under “Investor Relations” or by dialing 866-813-9403 (United States) or 929-458-6194 (internationally) and entering the passcode: 916742.

    ABOUT BROOKLINE BANCORP, INC.

    Brookline Bancorp, Inc., a bank holding company with $11.6 billion in assets and branch locations in Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and the Lower Hudson Valley of New York State, is headquartered in Boston, Massachusetts and operates as the holding company for Brookline Bank, Bank Rhode Island, and PCSB Bank (the “banks”). The Company provides commercial and retail banking services, cash management and investment services to customers throughout Central New England and the Lower Hudson Valley of New York State. More information about Brookline Bancorp, Inc. and its banks can be found at the following websites: www.brooklinebank.com, www.bankri.com and www.pcsb.com.

    FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

    Certain statements contained in this press release that are not historical facts may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are intended to be covered by the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. We may also make forward-looking statements in other documents we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), in our annual reports to shareholders, in press releases and other written materials, and in oral statements made by our officers, directors or employees. You can identify forward looking statements by the use of the words “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “estimate,” “assume,” “outlook,” “will,” “should,” and other expressions that predict or indicate future events and trends and which do not relate to historical matters, including statements regarding the Company’s business, credit quality, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations. Forward-looking statements may differ, possibly materially, from what is included in this press release due to factors and future developments that are uncertain and beyond the scope of the Company’s control. These include, but are not limited to, the occurrence of any event, change or other circumstances that could give rise to the right of the Company or Berkshire to terminate the merger agreement; the outcome of any legal proceedings that may be instituted against Berkshire or Company; delays in completing the proposed transaction with Berkshire; the failure to obtain necessary regulatory approvals (and the risk that such approvals may result in the imposition of conditions that could adversely affect the combined company or the expected benefits of the proposed transaction), or to satisfy any of the other conditions to the proposed transaction on a timely basis or at all, including the ability of Berkshire and the Company to meet expectations regarding the timing, completion and accounting and tax treatments of the proposed transaction; the impact of certain restrictions during the pendency of the proposed transaction on the parties’ ability to pursue certain business opportunities and strategic transactions; diversion of management’s attention from ongoing business operations and opportunities; potential adverse reactions or changes to business or employee relationships, including those resulting from the announcement or completion of the proposed transaction; changes in interest rates; general economic conditions (including the impact of actual or threatened tariffs imposed by the U.S. and foreign governments, inflation, and concerns about liquidity) on a national basis or in the local markets in which the Company operates; ongoing turbulence in the capital and debt markets; competitive pressures from other financial institutions; changes in consumer behavior due to changing political, business and economic conditions, or legislative or regulatory initiatives; changes in the value of securities and other assets in the Company’s investment portfolio; increases in loan and lease default and charge-off rates; the adequacy of allowances for loan and lease losses; decreases in deposit levels that necessitate increases in borrowing to fund loans and investments; operational risks including, but not limited to, cybersecurity incidents, fraud, natural disasters, and future pandemics; changes in regulation; the possibility that future credit losses may be higher than currently expected due to changes in economic assumptions and adverse economic developments; the risk that goodwill and intangibles recorded in the Company’s financial statements will become impaired; and changes in assumptions used in making such forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties which are difficult to predict. The Company’s actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements as a result of, among others, the risks outlined in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, as updated by its Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and other filings submitted to the SEC. The Company does not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect circumstances or events that occur after the date the forward-looking statements are made.

    BASIS OF PRESENTATION

    The Company’s consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) as set forth by the Financial Accounting Standards Board in its Accounting Standards Codification and through the rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under the authority of federal securities laws. Certain amounts previously reported have been reclassified to conform to the current period’s presentation.

    NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

    The Company uses certain non-GAAP financial measures, such as operating earnings after tax, operating earnings per common share, operating return on average assets, operating return on average tangible assets, operating return on average stockholders’ equity, operating return on average tangible stockholders’ equity, tangible book value per common share, tangible stockholders’ equity to tangible assets, return on average tangible assets (annualized) and return on average tangible stockholders’ equity (annualized). These non-GAAP financial measures provide information for investors to effectively analyze financial trends of ongoing business activities, and to enhance comparability with peers across the financial services sector. A detailed reconciliation table of the Company’s GAAP to the non-GAAP measures is attached.

    INVESTOR RELATIONS:

    Contact: Carl M. Carlson
      Brookline Bancorp, Inc.
      Co-President and Chief Financial and Strategy Officer
      (617) 425-5331
      carl.carlson@brkl.com
    BROOKLINE BANCORP, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES
    Selected Financial Highlights (Unaudited)
      At and for the Three Months Ended
      June 30,
    2025
      March 31,
    2025
      December 31,
    2024
      September 30,
    2024
      June 30,
    2024
      (Dollars in Thousands Except per Share Data)
    Earnings Data:                            
    Net interest income $ 88,685     $ 85,830     $ 84,988     $ 83,008     $ 80,001  
    Provision for credit losses on loans 6,997     5,974     4,141     4,832     5,607  
    Provision (recovery) of credit losses on investments 3     12     (104)     (172)     (39)  
    Non-interest income 5,970     5,660     6,587     6,348     6,396  
    Non-interest expense 58,061     60,022     63,719     57,948     59,184  
    Income before provision for income taxes 29,594     25,482     23,819     26,748     21,645  
    Net income 22,026     19,100     17,536     20,142     16,372  
                                 
    Performance Ratios:                            
    Net interest margin (1) 3.32 %   3.22 %   3.12 %   3.07 %   3.00 %
    Interest-rate spread (1) 2.57 %   2.38 %   2.35 %   2.26 %   2.14 %
    Return on average assets (annualized) 0.77 %   0.66 %   0.61 %   0.70 %   0.57 %
    Return on average tangible assets (annualized) (non-GAAP) 0.79 %   0.68 %   0.62 %   0.72 %   0.59 %
    Return on average stockholders’ equity (annualized) 7.04 %   6.19 %   5.69 %   6.63 %   5.49 %
    Return on average tangible stockholders’ equity (annualized) (non-GAAP) 8.85 %   7.82 %   7.21 %   8.44 %   7.04 %
    Efficiency ratio (2) 61.34 %   65.60 %   69.58 %   64.85 %   68.50 %
                                 
    Per Common Share Data:                            
    Net income — Basic $ 0.25     $ 0.21     $ 0.20     $ 0.23     $ 0.18  
    Net income — Diluted 0.25     0.21     0.20     0.23     0.18  
    Cash dividends declared 0.135     0.135     0.135     0.135     0.135  
    Book value per share (end of period) 14.08     13.92     13.71     13.81     13.48  
    Tangible book value per share (end of period) (non-GAAP) 11.20     11.03     10.81     10.89     10.53  
    Stock price (end of period) 10.55     10.90     11.80     10.09     8.35  
                                 
    Balance Sheet:                            
    Total assets $ 11,568,745     $ 11,519,869     $ 11,905,326     $ 11,676,721     $ 11,635,292  
    Total loans and leases 9,582,374     9,642,722     9,779,288     9,755,236     9,721,137  
    Total deposits 8,961,202     8,911,452     8,901,644     8,732,271     8,737,036  
    Total stockholders’ equity 1,254,171     1,240,182     1,221,939     1,230,362     1,198,480  
                                 
    Asset Quality:                            
    Nonperforming assets $ 63,596     $ 64,021     $ 70,452     $ 72,821     $ 62,683  
    Nonperforming assets as a percentage of total assets 0.55 %   0.56 %   0.59 %   0.62 %   0.54 %
    Allowance for loan and lease losses $ 126,725     $ 124,145     $ 125,083     $ 127,316     $ 121,750  
    Allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total loans and leases 1.32 %   1.29 %   1.28 %   1.31 %   1.25 %
    Net loan and lease charge-offs $ 5,127     $ 7,597     $ 7,252     $ 3,808     $ 8,387  
    Net loan and lease charge-offs as a percentage of average loans and leases (annualized) 0.21 %   0.31 %   0.30 %   0.16 %   0.35 %
                                 
    Capital Ratios:                            
    Stockholders’ equity to total assets 10.84 %   10.77 %   10.26 %   10.54 %   10.30 %
    Tangible stockholders’ equity to tangible assets (non-GAAP) 8.82 %   8.73 %   8.27 %   8.50 %   8.23 %
                                 
    (1) Calculated on a fully tax-equivalent basis.                            
    (2) Calculated as non-interest expense as a percentage of net interest income plus non-interest income.                            
    BROOKLINE BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)
               
      June 30,
    2025
      March 31,
    2025
      December 31,
    2024
      September 30,
    2024
      June 30,
    2024
     
    ASSETS (In Thousands Except Share Data)
    Cash and due from banks $ 87,386     $ 78,741     $ 64,673     $ 82,168     $ 60,067  
    Short-term investments   419,362       278,805       478,997       325,721       283,017  
    Total cash and cash equivalents   506,748       357,546       543,670       407,889       343,084  
    Investment securities available-for-sale   866,684       882,353       895,034       855,391       856,439  
    Total investment securities   866,684       882,353       895,034       855,391       856,439  
    Allowance for investment security losses   (97 )     (94 )     (82 )     (186 )     (359 )
    Net investment securities   866,587       882,259       894,952       855,205       856,080  
    Loans and leases:          
    Commercial real estate loans   5,485,546       5,580,982       5,716,114       5,779,290       5,782,111  
    Commercial loans and leases   2,520,347       2,512,912       2,506,664       2,453,038       2,443,530  
    Consumer loans   1,576,481       1,548,828       1,556,510       1,522,908       1,495,496  
    Total loans and leases   9,582,374       9,642,722       9,779,288       9,755,236       9,721,137  
    Allowance for loan and lease losses   (126,725 )     (124,145 )     (125,083 )     (127,316 )     (121,750 )
    Net loans and leases   9,455,649       9,518,577       9,654,205       9,627,920       9,599,387  
    Restricted equity securities   66,481       67,537       83,155       82,675       78,963  
    Premises and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation   83,963       84,439       86,781       86,925       88,378  
    Right-of-use asset operating leases   42,415       44,144       43,527       41,934       35,691  
    Deferred tax asset   52,325       52,176       56,620       50,827       60,032  
    Goodwill   241,222       241,222       241,222       241,222       241,222  
    Identified intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization   14,600       16,030       17,461       19,162       20,830  
    Other real estate owned and repossessed assets   1,288       917       1,103       1,579       1,974  
    Other assets   237,467       255,022       282,630       261,383       309,651  
    Total assets $ 11,568,745     $ 11,519,869     $ 11,905,326     $ 11,676,721     $ 11,635,292  
    LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY          
    Deposits:          
    Demand checking accounts $ 1,726,933     $ 1,664,629     $ 1,692,394     $ 1,681,858     $ 1,638,378  
    NOW accounts   650,707       625,492       617,246       637,374       647,370  
    Savings accounts   1,795,761       1,793,852       1,721,247       1,736,989       1,735,857  
    Money market accounts   2,153,709       2,183,855       2,116,360       2,041,185       2,073,557  
    Certificate of deposit accounts   1,877,661       1,878,665       1,885,444       1,819,353       1,718,414  
    Brokered deposit accounts   756,431       764,959       868,953       815,512       923,460  
    Total deposits   8,961,202       8,911,452       8,901,644       8,732,271       8,737,036  
    Borrowed funds:          
    Advances from the FHLB   934,669       957,848       1,355,926       1,345,003       1,265,079  
    Subordinated debentures and notes   84,397       84,362       84,328       84,293       84,258  
    Other borrowed funds   135,985       113,617       79,592       68,251       80,125  
    Total borrowed funds   1,155,051       1,155,827       1,519,846       1,497,547       1,429,462  
    Operating lease liabilities   43,528       45,330       44,785       43,266       37,102  
    Mortgagors’ escrow accounts   15,289       15,264       15,875       14,456       17,117  
    Reserve for unfunded credits   4,586       5,296       5,981       6,859       11,400  
    Accrued expenses and other liabilities   134,918       146,518       195,256       151,960       204,695  
    Total liabilities   10,314,574       10,279,687       10,683,387       10,446,359       10,436,812  
    Stockholders’ equity:          
    Common stock, $0.01 par value; 200,000,000 shares authorized; 96,998,075 shares issued, 96,998,075 shares issued, 96,998,075 shares issued, 96,998,075 shares issued, and 96,998,075 shares issued, respectively   970       970       970       970       970  
    Additional paid-in capital   904,697       903,696       902,584       901,562       904,775  
    Retained earnings   475,781       465,898       458,943       453,555       445,560  
    Accumulated other comprehensive income   (39,378 )     (42,498 )     (52,882 )     (38,081 )     (61,693 )
    Treasury stock, at cost;          
    7,039,136, 7,037,610, 7,019,384, 7,015,843, and 7,373,009 shares, respectively   (87,899 )     (87,884 )     (87,676 )     (87,644 )     (91,132 )
    Total stockholders’ equity   1,254,171       1,240,182       1,221,939       1,230,362       1,198,480  
    Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $ 11,568,745     $ 11,519,869     $ 11,905,326     $ 11,676,721     $ 11,635,292  
               
    BROOKLINE BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited)
      Three Months Ended
      June 30,
    2025
      March 31,
    2025
      December 31,
    2024
      September 30,
    2024
      June 30,
    2024
      (In Thousands Except Share Data)
    Interest and dividend income:          
    Loans and leases $ 143,933     $ 143,309     $ 147,436     $ 149,643     $ 145,585  
    Debt securities   6,691       6,765       6,421       6,473       6,480  
    Restricted equity securities   1,062       1,203       1,460       1,458       1,376  
    Short-term investments   2,386       2,451       2,830       1,986       1,914  
    Total interest and dividend income   154,072       153,728       158,147       159,560       155,355  
    Interest expense:          
    Deposits   52,682       53,478       56,562       59,796       59,721  
    Borrowed funds   12,705       14,420       16,597       16,756       15,633  
    Total interest expense   65,387       67,898       73,159       76,552       75,354  
    Net interest income   88,685       85,830       84,988       83,008       80,001  
    Provision for credit losses on loans   6,997       5,974       4,141       4,832       5,607  
    Provision (recovery) of credit losses on investments   3       12       (104 )     (172 )     (39 )
    Net interest income after provision for credit losses   81,685       79,844       80,951       78,348       74,433  
    Non-interest income:          
    Deposit fees   2,472       2,361       2,297       2,353       3,001  
    Loan fees   472       393       439       464       702  
    Loan level derivative income (loss)   (4 )     70       1,115             106  
    Gain on sales of loans and leases held-for-sale   264       24       406       415       130  
    Other   2,766       2,812       2,330       3,116       2,457  
    Total non-interest income   5,970       5,660       6,587       6,348       6,396  
    Non-interest expense:          
    Compensation and employee benefits   35,147       35,853       37,202       35,130       34,762  
    Occupancy   5,349       5,721       5,393       5,343       5,551  
    Equipment and data processing   6,841       7,012       6,780       6,831       6,732  
    Professional services   1,471       1,726       1,345       2,143       1,745  
    FDIC insurance   1,880       2,037       2,017       2,118       2,025  
    Advertising and marketing   1,371       868       1,303       859       1,504  
    Amortization of identified intangible assets   1,431       1,430       1,701       1,668       1,669  
    Merger and restructuring expense   439       971       3,378             823  
    Other   4,132       4,404       4,600       3,856       4,373  
    Total non-interest expense   58,061       60,022       63,719       57,948       59,184  
    Income before provision for income taxes   29,594       25,482       23,819       26,748       21,645  
    Provision for income taxes   7,568       6,382       6,283       6,606       5,273  
    Net income $ 22,026     $ 19,100     $ 17,536     $ 20,142     $ 16,372  
    Earnings per common share:          
    Basic $ 0.25     $ 0.21     $ 0.20     $ 0.23     $ 0.18  
    Diluted $ 0.25     $ 0.21     $ 0.20     $ 0.23     $ 0.18  
    Weighted average common shares outstanding during the period:        
    Basic   89,104,605       89,103,510       89,098,443       89,033,463       88,904,692  
    Diluted   89,612,781       89,567,747       89,483,964       89,319,611       89,222,315  
    Dividends paid per common share $ 0.135     $ 0.135     $ 0.135     $ 0.135     $ 0.135  
    BROOKLINE BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited)
       
      Six Months Ended June 30,
        2025       2024  
      (In Thousands Except Share Data)
    Interest and dividend income:    
    Loans and leases $ 287,242     $ 290,850  
    Debt securities   13,456       13,358  
    Restricted equity securities   2,265       2,868  
    Short-term investments   4,837       3,738  
    Total interest and dividend income   307,800       310,814  
    Interest expense:    
    Deposits   106,160       116,605  
    Borrowed funds   27,125       32,620  
    Total interest expense   133,285       149,225  
    Net interest income   174,515       161,589  
    Provision for credit losses on loans   12,971       13,030  
    Provision (credit) for credit losses on investments   15       (83 )
    Net interest income after provision for credit losses   161,529       148,642  
    Non-interest income:    
    Deposit Fees   4,833       5,898  
    Loan Fees   865       1,491  
    Loan level derivative income, net   66       543  
    Gain on sales of loans and leases held-for-sale   288       130  
    Other   5,578       4,618  
    Total non-interest income   11,630       12,680  
    Non-interest expense:    
    Compensation and employee benefits   71,000       71,391  
    Occupancy   11,070       11,320  
    Equipment and data processing   13,853       13,763  
    Professional services   3,197       3,645  
    FDIC insurance   3,917       3,909  
    Advertising and marketing   2,239       3,078  
    Amortization of identified intangible assets   2,861       3,377  
    Merger and restructuring expense   1,410       823  
    Other   8,536       8,892  
    Total non-interest expense   118,083       120,198  
    Income before provision for income taxes   55,076       41,124  
    Provision for income taxes   13,950       10,087  
    Net income $ 41,126     $ 31,037  
    Earnings per common share:    
    Basic $ 0.46     $ 0.35  
    Diluted $ 0.46     $ 0.35  
    Weighted average common shares outstanding during the period:  
    Basic   89,104,060       88,899,635  
    Diluted   89,590,267       89,201,912  
    Dividends paid per common share $ 0.270     $ 0.270  
    BROOKLINE BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    Asset Quality Analysis (Unaudited)
      At and for the Three Months Ended
        June 30,
    2025
          March 31,
    2025
          December 31,
    2024
          September 30,
    2024
          June 30,
    2024
     
      (Dollars in Thousands)
    NONPERFORMING ASSETS:          
    Loans and leases accounted for on a nonaccrual basis:          
    Commercial real estate mortgage $ 987     $ 10,842     $ 11,525     $ 11,595     $ 11,659  
    Multi-family mortgage   1,433       6,576       6,596       1,751        
    Total commercial real estate loans   2,420       17,418       18,121       13,346       11,659  
               
    Commercial   8,687       7,415       14,676       15,734       16,636  
    Equipment financing   46,067       32,975       31,509       37,223       27,128  
    Total commercial loans and leases   54,754       40,390       46,185       52,957       43,764  
               
    Residential mortgage   3,572       3,962       3,999       3,862       4,495  
    Home equity   1,561       1,333       1,043       1,076       790  
    Other consumer   1       1       1       1       1  
    Total consumer loans   5,134       5,296       5,043       4,939       5,286  
               
    Total nonaccrual loans and leases   62,308       63,104       69,349       71,242       60,709  
               
    Other real estate owned   700       700       700       780       780  
    Other repossessed assets   588       217       403       799       1,194  
    Total nonperforming assets $ 63,596     $ 64,021     $ 70,452     $ 72,821     $ 62,683  
               
    Loans and leases past due greater than 90 days and still accruing $ 24,899     $ 3,009     $ 811     $ 16,091     $ 4,994  
               
    Nonperforming loans and leases as a percentage of total loans and leases   0.65 %     0.65 %     0.71 %     0.73 %     0.62 %
    Nonperforming assets as a percentage of total assets   0.55 %     0.56 %     0.59 %     0.62 %     0.54 %
               
    PROVISION AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES:      
    Allowance for loan and lease losses at beginning of period $ 124,145     $ 125,083     $ 127,316     $ 121,750     $ 120,124  
    Charge-offs   (5,601 )     (9,073 )     (8,414 )     (4,183 )     (8,823 )
    Recoveries   474       1,476       1,162       375       436  
    Net charge-offs   (5,127 )     (7,597 )     (7,252 )     (3,808 )     (8,387 )
    Provision for loan and lease losses excluding unfunded commitments *   7,707       6,659       5,019       9,374       10,013  
    Allowance for loan and lease losses at end of period $ 126,725     $ 124,145     $ 125,083     $ 127,316     $ 121,750  
               
    Allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total loans and leases   1.32 %     1.29 %     1.28 %     1.31 %     1.25 %
               
    NET CHARGE-OFFS:          
    Commercial real estate loans $ 3,524     $     $     $     $ 3,819  
    Commercial loans and leases   1,640       7,647       7,257       3,797       4,571  
    Consumer loans   (37 )     (50 )     (5 )     11       (3 )
    Total net charge-offs $ 5,127     $ 7,597     $ 7,252     $ 3,808     $ 8,387  
               
    Net loan and lease charge-offs as a percentage of average loans and leases (annualized)   0.21 %     0.31 %     0.30 %     0.16 %     0.35 %
               
    *Provision for loan and lease losses does not include (credit) provision of $(0.7 million), $(0.7 million), $(0.9 million), $(4.5 million), and $(4.4 million) for credit losses on unfunded commitments during the three months ended June 30, 2025, March 31, 2025, December 31, 2024, September 30, 2024, and June 30, 2024, respectively.          
    BROOKLINE BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    Average Yields / Costs (Unaudited)
      Three Months Ended
      June 30,
    2025

      March 31,
    2025
      June 30,
    2024
      Average Balance   Interest (1)   Average Yield/ Cost   Average Balance   Interest (1)   Average Yield/ Cost
      Average Balance   Interest (1)   Average Yield/ Cost
      (Dollars in Thousands)
    Assets:                                                                      
    Interest-earning assets:                                                                      
    Investments:                                                                      
    Debt securities (2) $ 874,212     $ 6,752       3.09 %   $ 888,913     $ 6,814       3.07 %   $ 846,469     $ 6,510       3.08 %
    Restricted equity securities (2)   65,724       1,062       6.46 %     69,784       1,204       6.90 %     71,696       1,375       7.67 %
    Short-term investments   215,982       2,386       4.42 %     202,953       2,451       4.83 %     143,800       1,914       5.33 %
    Total investments   1,155,918       10,200       3.53 %     1,161,650       10,469       3.60 %     1,061,965       9,799       3.69 %
    Loans and Leases:                            
    Commercial real estate loans (3)   5,533,208       77,136       5.51 %     5,651,390       77,243       5.47 %     5,754,901       81,565       5.61 %
    Commercial loans (3)   1,286,908       20,757       6.38 %     1,237,078       19,698       6.37 %     1,069,154       17,672       6.54 %
    Equipment financing (3)   1,240,128       25,069       8.09 %     1,281,425       25,965       8.11 %     1,374,217       26,255       7.64 %
    Consumer loans (3)   1,556,254       21,437       5.51 %     1,548,973       20,861       5.41 %     1,488,587       20,291       5.46 %
    Total loans and leases   9,616,498       144,399       6.01 %     9,718,866       143,767       5.92 %     9,686,859       145,783       6.02 %
    Total interest-earning assets   10,772,416       154,599       5.74 %     10,880,516       154,236       5.67 %     10,748,824       155,582       5.79 %
    Non-interest-earning assets   630,518               662,814             704,570          
    Total assets $ 11,402,934             $ 11,543,330           $ 11,453,394          
                                 
    Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity:                            
    Interest-bearing liabilities:                            
    Deposits:                            
    NOW accounts $ 637,786       1,034       0.65 %   $ 628,346       1,005       0.65 %   $ 659,351       1,111       0.68 %
    Savings accounts   1,780,838       10,692       2.41 %     1,743,688       10,173       2.37 %     1,731,388       11,874       2.76 %
    Money market accounts   2,189,373       13,990       2.56 %     2,187,581       13,587       2.52 %     2,026,780       15,520       3.08 %
    Certificates of deposit   1,879,749       18,437       3.93 %     1,886,386       19,593       4.21 %     1,699,510       18,717       4.43 %
    Brokered deposit accounts   748,205       8,529       4.57 %     767,275       9,120       4.82 %     958,146       12,499       5.25 %
    Total interest-bearing deposits   7,235,951       52,682       2.92 %     7,213,276       53,478       3.01 %     7,075,175       59,721       3.39 %
    Borrowings                            
    Advances from the FHLB   904,399       10,422       4.56 %     1,007,508       11,847       4.70 %     1,049,609       12,894       4.86 %
    Subordinated debentures and notes   84,380       1,718       8.14 %     84,345       1,701       8.07 %     84,241       1,375       6.53 %
    Other borrowed funds   46,086       565       4.93 %     71,462       872       4.95 %     103,753       1,364       5.29 %
    Total borrowings   1,034,865       12,705       4.86 %     1,163,315       14,420       4.96 %     1,237,603       15,633       5.00 %
    Total interest-bearing liabilities   8,270,816       65,387       3.17 %     8,376,591       67,898       3.29 %     8,312,778       75,354       3.65 %
    Non-interest-bearing liabilities:                            
    Demand checking accounts   1,654,594               1,680,527             1,646,869          
    Other non-interest-bearing liabilities   225,469               251,011             300,362          
    Total liabilities   10,150,879               10,308,129             10,260,009          
    Stockholders’ equity   1,252,055               1,235,201             1,193,385          
    Total liabilities and equity $ 11,402,934             $ 11,543,330           $ 11,453,394          
    Net interest income (tax-equivalent basis) /Interest-rate spread (4)       89,212       2.57 %       86,338       2.38 %       80,228       2.14 %
    Less adjustment of tax-exempt income       527             508           227      
    Net interest income     $ 88,685           $ 85,830         $ 80,001      
    Net interest margin (5)           3.32 %           3.22 %           3.00 %
                                 
    (1) Tax-exempt income on debt securities, equity securities and revenue bonds included in commercial real estate loans is included on a tax-equivalent basis.
    (2) Average balances include unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities. Dividend payments may not be consistent and average yield on equity securities may vary from month to month.
    (3) Loans on nonaccrual status are included in the average balances.
    (4) Interest rate spread represents the difference between the yield on interest-earning assets and the cost of interest-bearing liabilities.
    (5) Net interest margin represents net interest income (tax-equivalent basis) divided by average interest-earning assets on an actual/actual basis.
    BROOKLINE BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    Average Yields / Costs (Unaudited)
      Six Months Ended
      June 30, 2025   June 30, 2024
      Average
    Balance
      Interest (1)   Average Yield/
    Cost

      Average
    Balance
      Interest (1)   Average Yield/
    Cost
          
      (Dollars in Thousands)
    Assets:                                              
    Interest-earning assets:                                              
    Investments:                                              
    Debt securities (2) $ 881,522     $ 13,566       3.08 %   $ 869,848     $ 13,437       3.09 %
    Restricted equity securities (2)   67,743       2,266       6.69 %     74,015       2,868       7.75 %
    Short-term investments   209,503       4,837       4.62 %     137,284       3,738       5.45 %
    Total investments   1,158,768       20,669       3.57 %     1,081,147       20,043       3.71 %
    Loans and Leases:                  
    Commercial real estate loans (3)   5,591,973       154,379       5.49 %     5,758,318       162,614       5.59 %
    Commercial loans (3)   1,262,130       40,455       6.38 %     1,047,810       35,179       6.64 %
    Equipment financing (3)   1,260,663       51,034       8.10 %     1,374,322       53,150       7.73 %
    Consumer loans (3)   1,552,633       42,298       5.46 %     1,485,702       40,269       5.43 %
    Total loans and leases   9,667,399       288,166       5.96 %     9,666,152       291,212       6.03 %
    Total interest-earning assets   10,826,167       308,835       5.71 %     10,747,299       311,255       5.79 %
    Non-interest-earning assets   646,577             684,343        
    Total assets $ 11,472,744           $ 11,431,642        
                       
    Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity:                  
    Interest-bearing liabilities:                  
    Deposits:                  
    NOW accounts $ 633,092       2,039       0.65 %   $ 665,632       2,372       0.72 %
    Savings accounts   1,762,366       20,865       2.39 %     1,712,804       23,226       2.73 %
    Money market accounts   2,188,482       27,577       2.54 %     2,051,542       31,474       3.09 %
    Certificates of deposit   1,883,049       38,030       4.07 %     1,661,814       35,389       4.28 %
    Brokered deposit accounts   757,687       17,649       4.70 %     927,465       24,144       5.23 %
    Total interest-bearing deposits   7,224,676       106,160       2.96 %     7,019,257       116,605       3.34 %
    Borrowings                  
    Advances from the FHLB   955,669       22,269       4.63 %     1,107,071       27,527       4.92 %
    Subordinated debentures and notes   84,363       3,419       8.11 %     84,223       2,752       6.54 %
    Other borrowed funds   58,704       1,437       4.94 %     98,406       2,341       4.78 %
    Total borrowings   1,098,736       27,125       4.91 %     1,289,700       32,620       5.00 %
    Total interest-bearing liabilities   8,323,412       133,285       3.23 %     8,308,957       149,225       3.61 %
    Non-interest-bearing liabilities:                  
        Demand checking accounts   1,667,489             1,635,690        
        Other non-interest-bearing liabilities   238,169             289,351        
    Total liabilities   10,229,070             10,233,998        
    Stockholders’ equity   1,243,674             1,197,644        
    Total liabilities and equity $ 11,472,744           $ 11,431,642        
    Net interest income (tax-equivalent basis) /Interest-rate spread (4)       175,550       2.48 %         162,030       2.18 %
    Less adjustment of tax-exempt income       1,035             441    
    Net interest income     $ 174,515           $ 161,589    
    Net interest margin (5)           3.27 %             3.03 %
                       
    (1) Tax-exempt income on debt securities, equity securities and revenue bonds included in commercial real estate loans is included on a tax-equivalent basis.
    (2) Average balances include unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities. Dividend payments may not be consistent and average yield on equity securities may vary from month to month.
    (3) Loans on nonaccrual status are included in the average balances.
    (4) Interest rate spread represents the difference between the yield on interest-earning assets and the cost of interest-bearing liabilities.
    (5) Net interest margin represents net interest income (tax-equivalent basis) divided by average interest-earning assets on an actual/actual basis.
    BROOKLINE BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    Non-GAAP Financial Information (Unaudited)
      At and for the Three Months Ended
    March 31,
      At and for the Six Months Ended
    June 30,
        2025       2024       2025       2024  
    Reconciliation Table – Non-GAAP Financial Information (Dollars in Thousands Except Share Data)   (Dollars in Thousands Except Share Data)
                   
    Reported Pretax Income $ 29,594     $ 21,645     $ 55,076     $ 41,124  
    Add:              
    Merger and restructuring expense   439       823       1,410       823  
    Operating Pretax Income $ 30,033     $ 22,468     $ 56,486     $ 41,947  
    Effective tax rate   25.3 %     24.4 %     24.8 %     24.5 %
    Provision for income taxes   7,590       5,473       14,008       10,289  
    Operating earnings after tax $ 22,443     $ 16,995     $ 42,478     $ 31,658  
                   
    Operating earnings per common share:              
    Basic $ 0.25     $ 0.19     $ 0.48     $ 0.36  
    Diluted $ 0.25     $ 0.19     $ 0.47     $ 0.35  
                   
    Weighted average common shares outstanding during the period:              
    Basic   89,104,605       88,904,692       89,104,060       88,899,635  
    Diluted   89,612,781       89,222,315       89,590,267       89,201,912  
                   
    Return on average assets *   0.77 %     0.57 %     0.72 %     0.54 %
    Add:              
    Merger and restructuring expense (after-tax) *   0.01 %     0.02 %     0.02 %     0.01 %
    Operating return on average assets *   0.78 %     0.59 %     0.74 %     0.55 %
                   
    Return on average tangible assets *   0.79 %     0.59 %     0.73 %     0.56 %
    Add:              
    Merger and restructuring expense (after-tax) *   0.01 %     0.02 %     0.02 %     0.01 %
    Operating return on average tangible assets *   0.80 %     0.61 %     0.75 %     0.57 %
                   
                   
    Return on average stockholders’ equity *   7.04 %     5.49 %     6.61 %     5.18 %
    Add:              
    Merger and restructuring expense (after-tax) *   0.10 %     0.21 %     0.17 %     0.10 %
    Operating return on average stockholders’ equity *   7.14 %     5.70 %     6.78 %     5.28 %
                   
                   
    Return on average tangible stockholders’ equity *   8.85 %     7.04 %     8.34 %     6.65 %
    Add:              
    Merger and restructuring expense (after-tax) *   0.13 %     0.27 %     0.21 %     0.13 %
    Operating return on average tangible stockholders’ equity *   8.98 %     7.31 %     8.55 %     6.78 %
                   
    * Ratios at and for the three months and six months ended are annualized.              
      At and for the Three Months Ended
      June 30,
    2025
    March 31,
    2025
      December 31,
    2024
      September 30,
    2024
      June 30,
    2024
      (Dollars in Thousands)
                     
    Net income, as reported $ 22,026   $ 19,100     $ 17,536     $ 20,142     $ 16,372  
                     
    Average total assets $ 11,402,934   $ 11,543,330     $ 11,580,572     $ 11,451,338     $ 11,453,394  
    Less: Average goodwill and average identified intangible assets, net   256,508     257,941       259,496       261,188       262,859  
    Average tangible assets $ 11,146,426   $ 11,285,389     $ 11,321,076     $ 11,190,150     $ 11,190,535  
                     
    Return on average tangible assets (annualized)   0.79 %   0.68 %     0.62 %     0.72 %     0.59 %
                     
    Average total stockholders’ equity $ 1,252,055   $ 1,235,201     $ 1,232,527     $ 1,216,037     $ 1,193,385  
    Less: Average goodwill and average identified intangible assets, net   256,508     257,941       259,496       261,188       262,859  
    Average tangible stockholders’ equity $ 995,547   $ 977,260     $ 973,031     $ 954,849     $ 930,526  
                     
    Return on average tangible stockholders’ equity (annualized)   8.85 %   7.82 %     7.21 %     8.44 %     7.04 %
                     
    Total stockholders’ equity $ 1,254,171   $ 1,240,182     $ 1,221,939     $ 1,230,362     $ 1,198,480  
    Less:                
    Goodwill   241,222     241,222       241,222       241,222       241,222  
    Identified intangible assets, net   14,600     16,030       17,461       19,162       20,830  
    Tangible stockholders’ equity $ 998,349   $ 982,930     $ 963,256     $ 969,978     $ 936,428  
                     
    Total assets $ 11,568,745   $ 11,519,869     $ 11,905,326     $ 11,676,721     $ 11,635,292  
    Less:                
    Goodwill   241,222     241,222       241,222       241,222       241,222  
    Identified intangible assets, net   14,600     16,030       17,461       19,162       20,830  
    Tangible assets $ 11,312,923   $ 11,262,617     $ 11,646,643     $ 11,416,337     $ 11,373,240  
                     
    Tangible stockholders’ equity to tangible assets   8.82 %   8.73 %     8.27 %     8.50 %     8.23 %
                     
    Tangible stockholders’ equity $ 998,349   $ 982,930     $ 963,256     $ 969,978     $ 936,428  
                     
    Number of common shares issued   96,998,075     96,998,075       96,998,075       96,998,075       96,998,075  
    Less:                
    Treasury shares   7,039,136     7,037,610       7,019,384       7,015,843       7,373,009  
    Unvested restricted shares   854,334     855,860       880,248       883,789       713,443  
    Number of common shares outstanding   89,104,605     89,104,605       89,098,443       89,098,443       88,911,623  
                     
    Tangible book value per common share $ 11.20   $ 11.03     $ 10.81     $ 10.89     $ 10.53  

    PDF available: http://ml.globenewswire.com/Resource/Download/713b7b8a-a804-4b26-a467-f10b0d266b1b 

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: Brookline Bancorp Announces Second Quarter Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Net Income of $22.0 million, EPS of $0.25

    Quarterly Dividend of $0.135

    BOSTON, July 23, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Brookline Bancorp, Inc. (NASDAQ: BRKL) (the “Company”) today announced net income of $22.0 million, or $0.25 per basic and diluted share, for the second quarter of 2025, compared to net income of $19.1 million, or $0.21 per basic and diluted share, for the first quarter of 2025, and $16.4 million, or $0.18 per basic and diluted share, for the second quarter of 2024. The Company reported operating earnings after tax (non-GAAP) of $22.4 million, or $0.25 per basic and diluted share, for the second quarter of 2025, compared to operating earnings after tax (non-GAAP) of $20.0 million, or $0.22 per basic and diluted share, for the first quarter of 2025, and $17.0 million, or $0.19 per basic and diluted share, for the second quarter of 2024.

    Commenting on the second quarter’s performance, Mr. Perrault stated, “We are pleased to report solid earnings for the second quarter of the year led by growth in our C&I portfolio and deposits. Our dedicated team of bankers continue to provide exceptional service to the communities we serve. As a result of these efforts, our net interest margin expanded again this quarter despite intentional contraction in our commercial real estate portfolio.”

    BALANCE SHEET

    Total assets at June 30, 2025 were $11.6 billion, representing an increase of $48.9 million from $11.5 billion at March 31, 2025, primarily driven by an increase in cash and cash equivalents partially offset by a reduction of loans and leases. Total assets decreased $66.5 million from June 30, 2024.

    At June 30, 2025, total loans and leases were $9.6 billion, representing a decrease of $60.3 million from March 31, 2025, and a decrease of $138.8 million from June 30, 2024.

    Total investment securities at June 30, 2025 decreased $15.7 million to $866.7 million from $882.4 million at March 31, 2025, and increased $10.3 million from $856.4 million at June 30, 2024. Total cash and cash equivalents at June 30, 2025 increased $149.2 million to $506.7 million from $357.5 million at March 31, 2025, and increased $163.6 million from $343.1 million at June 30, 2024. As of June 30, 2025, total investment securities and total cash and cash equivalents represented 11.9 percent of total assets, compared to 10.8 percent and 10.3 percent as of March 31, 2025 and June 30, 2024, respectively.

    Total deposits at June 30, 2025 increased $49.8 million to $9.0 billion from March 31, 2025, primarily driven by an increase of $58.3 million in customer deposits partially offset by a decline of $8.5 million in brokered deposits. Total deposits increased $224.2 million from $8.7 billion at June 30, 2024, primarily driven by an increase of $391.2 million in customer deposits partially offset by a decline of $167.0 million in brokered deposits.

    Total borrowed funds at June 30, 2025 remained flat at $1.2 billion compared to March 31, 2025, and decreased $274.4 million from $1.4 billion at June 30, 2024.

    The ratio of stockholders’ equity to total assets was 10.84 percent at June 30, 2025, as compared to 10.77 percent at March 31, 2025, and 10.30 percent at June 30, 2024. The ratio of tangible stockholders’ equity to tangible assets (non-GAAP) was 8.82 percent at June 30, 2025, as compared to 8.73 percent at March 31, 2025, and 8.23 percent at June 30, 2024. Tangible book value per common share (non-GAAP) increased $0.17 from $11.03 at March 31, 2025 to $11.20 at June 30, 2025, and increased $0.67 from $10.53 at June 30, 2024.

    NET INTEREST INCOME

    Net interest income increased $2.9 million to $88.7 million during the second quarter of 2025 from $85.8 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2025. The net interest margin increased 10 basis points to 3.32 percent for the three months ended June 30, 2025 from 3.22 percent for the three months ended March 31, 2025, primarily driven by lower funding costs and higher yields on loans and leases.

    NON-INTEREST INCOME

    Total non-interest income for the quarter ended June 30, 2025 increased $0.3 million to $6.0 million from $5.7 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2025. The increase was primarily driven by an increase of $0.2 million in gain on sales of loans and leases.

    PROVISION FOR CREDIT LOSSES

    The Company recorded a provision for credit losses of $7.0 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2025, compared to $6.0 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2025. The increase in provision was driven by a combination of continued stress in the Boston office sector as well as additional specific reserves on two large Eastern Funding credits.

    Total net charge-offs for the second quarter of 2025 were $5.1 million, compared to $7.6 million in the first quarter of 2025. The $5.1 million in net charge-offs was driven by two commercial real estate loans that were sold during the quarter resulting in a combined $3.5 million in net charge-offs. The ratio of net loan and lease charge-offs to average loans and leases on an annualized basis decreased to 21 basis points for the second quarter of 2025 from 31 basis points for the first quarter of 2025.

    The allowance for loan and lease losses represented 1.32 percent of total loans and leases at June 30, 2025, compared to 1.29 percent at March 31, 2025, and 1.25 percent at June 30, 2024.

    ASSET QUALITY

    The ratio of nonperforming loans and leases to total loans and leases was 0.65 percent at June 30, 2025, flat compared to March 31, 2025. Total nonaccrual loans and leases decreased $0.8 million to $62.3 million at June 30, 2025 from $63.1 million at March 31, 2025, driven by the sale of two commercial real estate loans. The ratio of nonperforming assets to total assets was 0.55 percent at June 30, 2025, a decrease from 0.56 percent at March 31, 2025. Total nonperforming assets decreased $0.4 million to $63.6 million at June 30, 2025 from $64.0 million at March 31, 2025.

    NON-INTEREST EXPENSE

    Non-interest expense for the quarter ended June 30, 2025 decreased $1.9 million to $58.1 million from $60.0 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2025. The decrease was primarily driven by decreases of $0.7 million in compensation and employee benefits expense, $0.5 million in merger and acquisition expense related to the previously announced proposed merger of the Company with Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. (“Berkshire”), and $0.4 million in occupancy expense, partially offset by an increase of $0.5 million in advertising and marketing expense.

    PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES

    The effective tax rate was 25.6 percent and 25.3 percent for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025 compared to 25.0 percent for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 24.4 percent and 24.5 percent for the three and six months ended June 30, 2024.

    RETURNS ON AVERAGE ASSETS AND AVERAGE EQUITY

    The annualized return on average assets increased to 0.77 percent during the second quarter 2025 from 0.66 percent for the first quarter of 2025.

    The annualized return on average stockholders’ equity increased to 7.04 percent during the second quarter of 2025 from 6.19 percent for the first quarter of 2025. The annualized return on average tangible stockholders’ equity (non-GAAP) increased to 8.85 percent for the second quarter of 2025 from 7.82 percent for the first quarter of 2025.

    DIVIDEND DECLARED

    The Company’s Board of Directors approved a dividend of $0.135 per share for the quarter ended June 30, 2025. The dividend will be paid on August 22, 2025 to stockholders of record on August 8, 2025.

    CONFERENCE CALL

    The Company will conduct a conference call/webcast at 1:30 PM Eastern Time on Thursday, July 24, 2025 to discuss the results for the quarter, business highlights and outlook. A copy of the Earnings Presentation is available on the Company’s website, www.brooklinebancorp.com. To listen to the call and view the Company’s Earnings Presentation, please join the call via https://events.q4inc.com/attendee/149362707. To listen to the call without access to the slides, interested parties may dial 833-470-1428 (United States) or 404-975-4839 (internationally) and ask for the Brookline Bancorp, Inc. conference call (Access Code 673409). A recorded playback of the call will be available for one week following the call on the Company’s website under “Investor Relations” or by dialing 866-813-9403 (United States) or 929-458-6194 (internationally) and entering the passcode: 916742.

    ABOUT BROOKLINE BANCORP, INC.

    Brookline Bancorp, Inc., a bank holding company with $11.6 billion in assets and branch locations in Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and the Lower Hudson Valley of New York State, is headquartered in Boston, Massachusetts and operates as the holding company for Brookline Bank, Bank Rhode Island, and PCSB Bank (the “banks”). The Company provides commercial and retail banking services, cash management and investment services to customers throughout Central New England and the Lower Hudson Valley of New York State. More information about Brookline Bancorp, Inc. and its banks can be found at the following websites: www.brooklinebank.com, www.bankri.com and www.pcsb.com.

    FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

    Certain statements contained in this press release that are not historical facts may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are intended to be covered by the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. We may also make forward-looking statements in other documents we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), in our annual reports to shareholders, in press releases and other written materials, and in oral statements made by our officers, directors or employees. You can identify forward looking statements by the use of the words “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “estimate,” “assume,” “outlook,” “will,” “should,” and other expressions that predict or indicate future events and trends and which do not relate to historical matters, including statements regarding the Company’s business, credit quality, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations. Forward-looking statements may differ, possibly materially, from what is included in this press release due to factors and future developments that are uncertain and beyond the scope of the Company’s control. These include, but are not limited to, the occurrence of any event, change or other circumstances that could give rise to the right of the Company or Berkshire to terminate the merger agreement; the outcome of any legal proceedings that may be instituted against Berkshire or Company; delays in completing the proposed transaction with Berkshire; the failure to obtain necessary regulatory approvals (and the risk that such approvals may result in the imposition of conditions that could adversely affect the combined company or the expected benefits of the proposed transaction), or to satisfy any of the other conditions to the proposed transaction on a timely basis or at all, including the ability of Berkshire and the Company to meet expectations regarding the timing, completion and accounting and tax treatments of the proposed transaction; the impact of certain restrictions during the pendency of the proposed transaction on the parties’ ability to pursue certain business opportunities and strategic transactions; diversion of management’s attention from ongoing business operations and opportunities; potential adverse reactions or changes to business or employee relationships, including those resulting from the announcement or completion of the proposed transaction; changes in interest rates; general economic conditions (including the impact of actual or threatened tariffs imposed by the U.S. and foreign governments, inflation, and concerns about liquidity) on a national basis or in the local markets in which the Company operates; ongoing turbulence in the capital and debt markets; competitive pressures from other financial institutions; changes in consumer behavior due to changing political, business and economic conditions, or legislative or regulatory initiatives; changes in the value of securities and other assets in the Company’s investment portfolio; increases in loan and lease default and charge-off rates; the adequacy of allowances for loan and lease losses; decreases in deposit levels that necessitate increases in borrowing to fund loans and investments; operational risks including, but not limited to, cybersecurity incidents, fraud, natural disasters, and future pandemics; changes in regulation; the possibility that future credit losses may be higher than currently expected due to changes in economic assumptions and adverse economic developments; the risk that goodwill and intangibles recorded in the Company’s financial statements will become impaired; and changes in assumptions used in making such forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties which are difficult to predict. The Company’s actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements as a result of, among others, the risks outlined in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, as updated by its Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and other filings submitted to the SEC. The Company does not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect circumstances or events that occur after the date the forward-looking statements are made.

    BASIS OF PRESENTATION

    The Company’s consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) as set forth by the Financial Accounting Standards Board in its Accounting Standards Codification and through the rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under the authority of federal securities laws. Certain amounts previously reported have been reclassified to conform to the current period’s presentation.

    NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

    The Company uses certain non-GAAP financial measures, such as operating earnings after tax, operating earnings per common share, operating return on average assets, operating return on average tangible assets, operating return on average stockholders’ equity, operating return on average tangible stockholders’ equity, tangible book value per common share, tangible stockholders’ equity to tangible assets, return on average tangible assets (annualized) and return on average tangible stockholders’ equity (annualized). These non-GAAP financial measures provide information for investors to effectively analyze financial trends of ongoing business activities, and to enhance comparability with peers across the financial services sector. A detailed reconciliation table of the Company’s GAAP to the non-GAAP measures is attached.

    INVESTOR RELATIONS:

    Contact: Carl M. Carlson
      Brookline Bancorp, Inc.
      Co-President and Chief Financial and Strategy Officer
      (617) 425-5331
      carl.carlson@brkl.com
    BROOKLINE BANCORP, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES
    Selected Financial Highlights (Unaudited)
      At and for the Three Months Ended
      June 30,
    2025
      March 31,
    2025
      December 31,
    2024
      September 30,
    2024
      June 30,
    2024
      (Dollars in Thousands Except per Share Data)
    Earnings Data:                            
    Net interest income $ 88,685     $ 85,830     $ 84,988     $ 83,008     $ 80,001  
    Provision for credit losses on loans 6,997     5,974     4,141     4,832     5,607  
    Provision (recovery) of credit losses on investments 3     12     (104)     (172)     (39)  
    Non-interest income 5,970     5,660     6,587     6,348     6,396  
    Non-interest expense 58,061     60,022     63,719     57,948     59,184  
    Income before provision for income taxes 29,594     25,482     23,819     26,748     21,645  
    Net income 22,026     19,100     17,536     20,142     16,372  
                                 
    Performance Ratios:                            
    Net interest margin (1) 3.32 %   3.22 %   3.12 %   3.07 %   3.00 %
    Interest-rate spread (1) 2.57 %   2.38 %   2.35 %   2.26 %   2.14 %
    Return on average assets (annualized) 0.77 %   0.66 %   0.61 %   0.70 %   0.57 %
    Return on average tangible assets (annualized) (non-GAAP) 0.79 %   0.68 %   0.62 %   0.72 %   0.59 %
    Return on average stockholders’ equity (annualized) 7.04 %   6.19 %   5.69 %   6.63 %   5.49 %
    Return on average tangible stockholders’ equity (annualized) (non-GAAP) 8.85 %   7.82 %   7.21 %   8.44 %   7.04 %
    Efficiency ratio (2) 61.34 %   65.60 %   69.58 %   64.85 %   68.50 %
                                 
    Per Common Share Data:                            
    Net income — Basic $ 0.25     $ 0.21     $ 0.20     $ 0.23     $ 0.18  
    Net income — Diluted 0.25     0.21     0.20     0.23     0.18  
    Cash dividends declared 0.135     0.135     0.135     0.135     0.135  
    Book value per share (end of period) 14.08     13.92     13.71     13.81     13.48  
    Tangible book value per share (end of period) (non-GAAP) 11.20     11.03     10.81     10.89     10.53  
    Stock price (end of period) 10.55     10.90     11.80     10.09     8.35  
                                 
    Balance Sheet:                            
    Total assets $ 11,568,745     $ 11,519,869     $ 11,905,326     $ 11,676,721     $ 11,635,292  
    Total loans and leases 9,582,374     9,642,722     9,779,288     9,755,236     9,721,137  
    Total deposits 8,961,202     8,911,452     8,901,644     8,732,271     8,737,036  
    Total stockholders’ equity 1,254,171     1,240,182     1,221,939     1,230,362     1,198,480  
                                 
    Asset Quality:                            
    Nonperforming assets $ 63,596     $ 64,021     $ 70,452     $ 72,821     $ 62,683  
    Nonperforming assets as a percentage of total assets 0.55 %   0.56 %   0.59 %   0.62 %   0.54 %
    Allowance for loan and lease losses $ 126,725     $ 124,145     $ 125,083     $ 127,316     $ 121,750  
    Allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total loans and leases 1.32 %   1.29 %   1.28 %   1.31 %   1.25 %
    Net loan and lease charge-offs $ 5,127     $ 7,597     $ 7,252     $ 3,808     $ 8,387  
    Net loan and lease charge-offs as a percentage of average loans and leases (annualized) 0.21 %   0.31 %   0.30 %   0.16 %   0.35 %
                                 
    Capital Ratios:                            
    Stockholders’ equity to total assets 10.84 %   10.77 %   10.26 %   10.54 %   10.30 %
    Tangible stockholders’ equity to tangible assets (non-GAAP) 8.82 %   8.73 %   8.27 %   8.50 %   8.23 %
                                 
    (1) Calculated on a fully tax-equivalent basis.                            
    (2) Calculated as non-interest expense as a percentage of net interest income plus non-interest income.                            
    BROOKLINE BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)
               
      June 30,
    2025
      March 31,
    2025
      December 31,
    2024
      September 30,
    2024
      June 30,
    2024
     
    ASSETS (In Thousands Except Share Data)
    Cash and due from banks $ 87,386     $ 78,741     $ 64,673     $ 82,168     $ 60,067  
    Short-term investments   419,362       278,805       478,997       325,721       283,017  
    Total cash and cash equivalents   506,748       357,546       543,670       407,889       343,084  
    Investment securities available-for-sale   866,684       882,353       895,034       855,391       856,439  
    Total investment securities   866,684       882,353       895,034       855,391       856,439  
    Allowance for investment security losses   (97 )     (94 )     (82 )     (186 )     (359 )
    Net investment securities   866,587       882,259       894,952       855,205       856,080  
    Loans and leases:          
    Commercial real estate loans   5,485,546       5,580,982       5,716,114       5,779,290       5,782,111  
    Commercial loans and leases   2,520,347       2,512,912       2,506,664       2,453,038       2,443,530  
    Consumer loans   1,576,481       1,548,828       1,556,510       1,522,908       1,495,496  
    Total loans and leases   9,582,374       9,642,722       9,779,288       9,755,236       9,721,137  
    Allowance for loan and lease losses   (126,725 )     (124,145 )     (125,083 )     (127,316 )     (121,750 )
    Net loans and leases   9,455,649       9,518,577       9,654,205       9,627,920       9,599,387  
    Restricted equity securities   66,481       67,537       83,155       82,675       78,963  
    Premises and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation   83,963       84,439       86,781       86,925       88,378  
    Right-of-use asset operating leases   42,415       44,144       43,527       41,934       35,691  
    Deferred tax asset   52,325       52,176       56,620       50,827       60,032  
    Goodwill   241,222       241,222       241,222       241,222       241,222  
    Identified intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization   14,600       16,030       17,461       19,162       20,830  
    Other real estate owned and repossessed assets   1,288       917       1,103       1,579       1,974  
    Other assets   237,467       255,022       282,630       261,383       309,651  
    Total assets $ 11,568,745     $ 11,519,869     $ 11,905,326     $ 11,676,721     $ 11,635,292  
    LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY          
    Deposits:          
    Demand checking accounts $ 1,726,933     $ 1,664,629     $ 1,692,394     $ 1,681,858     $ 1,638,378  
    NOW accounts   650,707       625,492       617,246       637,374       647,370  
    Savings accounts   1,795,761       1,793,852       1,721,247       1,736,989       1,735,857  
    Money market accounts   2,153,709       2,183,855       2,116,360       2,041,185       2,073,557  
    Certificate of deposit accounts   1,877,661       1,878,665       1,885,444       1,819,353       1,718,414  
    Brokered deposit accounts   756,431       764,959       868,953       815,512       923,460  
    Total deposits   8,961,202       8,911,452       8,901,644       8,732,271       8,737,036  
    Borrowed funds:          
    Advances from the FHLB   934,669       957,848       1,355,926       1,345,003       1,265,079  
    Subordinated debentures and notes   84,397       84,362       84,328       84,293       84,258  
    Other borrowed funds   135,985       113,617       79,592       68,251       80,125  
    Total borrowed funds   1,155,051       1,155,827       1,519,846       1,497,547       1,429,462  
    Operating lease liabilities   43,528       45,330       44,785       43,266       37,102  
    Mortgagors’ escrow accounts   15,289       15,264       15,875       14,456       17,117  
    Reserve for unfunded credits   4,586       5,296       5,981       6,859       11,400  
    Accrued expenses and other liabilities   134,918       146,518       195,256       151,960       204,695  
    Total liabilities   10,314,574       10,279,687       10,683,387       10,446,359       10,436,812  
    Stockholders’ equity:          
    Common stock, $0.01 par value; 200,000,000 shares authorized; 96,998,075 shares issued, 96,998,075 shares issued, 96,998,075 shares issued, 96,998,075 shares issued, and 96,998,075 shares issued, respectively   970       970       970       970       970  
    Additional paid-in capital   904,697       903,696       902,584       901,562       904,775  
    Retained earnings   475,781       465,898       458,943       453,555       445,560  
    Accumulated other comprehensive income   (39,378 )     (42,498 )     (52,882 )     (38,081 )     (61,693 )
    Treasury stock, at cost;          
    7,039,136, 7,037,610, 7,019,384, 7,015,843, and 7,373,009 shares, respectively   (87,899 )     (87,884 )     (87,676 )     (87,644 )     (91,132 )
    Total stockholders’ equity   1,254,171       1,240,182       1,221,939       1,230,362       1,198,480  
    Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $ 11,568,745     $ 11,519,869     $ 11,905,326     $ 11,676,721     $ 11,635,292  
               
    BROOKLINE BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited)
      Three Months Ended
      June 30,
    2025
      March 31,
    2025
      December 31,
    2024
      September 30,
    2024
      June 30,
    2024
      (In Thousands Except Share Data)
    Interest and dividend income:          
    Loans and leases $ 143,933     $ 143,309     $ 147,436     $ 149,643     $ 145,585  
    Debt securities   6,691       6,765       6,421       6,473       6,480  
    Restricted equity securities   1,062       1,203       1,460       1,458       1,376  
    Short-term investments   2,386       2,451       2,830       1,986       1,914  
    Total interest and dividend income   154,072       153,728       158,147       159,560       155,355  
    Interest expense:          
    Deposits   52,682       53,478       56,562       59,796       59,721  
    Borrowed funds   12,705       14,420       16,597       16,756       15,633  
    Total interest expense   65,387       67,898       73,159       76,552       75,354  
    Net interest income   88,685       85,830       84,988       83,008       80,001  
    Provision for credit losses on loans   6,997       5,974       4,141       4,832       5,607  
    Provision (recovery) of credit losses on investments   3       12       (104 )     (172 )     (39 )
    Net interest income after provision for credit losses   81,685       79,844       80,951       78,348       74,433  
    Non-interest income:          
    Deposit fees   2,472       2,361       2,297       2,353       3,001  
    Loan fees   472       393       439       464       702  
    Loan level derivative income (loss)   (4 )     70       1,115             106  
    Gain on sales of loans and leases held-for-sale   264       24       406       415       130  
    Other   2,766       2,812       2,330       3,116       2,457  
    Total non-interest income   5,970       5,660       6,587       6,348       6,396  
    Non-interest expense:          
    Compensation and employee benefits   35,147       35,853       37,202       35,130       34,762  
    Occupancy   5,349       5,721       5,393       5,343       5,551  
    Equipment and data processing   6,841       7,012       6,780       6,831       6,732  
    Professional services   1,471       1,726       1,345       2,143       1,745  
    FDIC insurance   1,880       2,037       2,017       2,118       2,025  
    Advertising and marketing   1,371       868       1,303       859       1,504  
    Amortization of identified intangible assets   1,431       1,430       1,701       1,668       1,669  
    Merger and restructuring expense   439       971       3,378             823  
    Other   4,132       4,404       4,600       3,856       4,373  
    Total non-interest expense   58,061       60,022       63,719       57,948       59,184  
    Income before provision for income taxes   29,594       25,482       23,819       26,748       21,645  
    Provision for income taxes   7,568       6,382       6,283       6,606       5,273  
    Net income $ 22,026     $ 19,100     $ 17,536     $ 20,142     $ 16,372  
    Earnings per common share:          
    Basic $ 0.25     $ 0.21     $ 0.20     $ 0.23     $ 0.18  
    Diluted $ 0.25     $ 0.21     $ 0.20     $ 0.23     $ 0.18  
    Weighted average common shares outstanding during the period:        
    Basic   89,104,605       89,103,510       89,098,443       89,033,463       88,904,692  
    Diluted   89,612,781       89,567,747       89,483,964       89,319,611       89,222,315  
    Dividends paid per common share $ 0.135     $ 0.135     $ 0.135     $ 0.135     $ 0.135  
    BROOKLINE BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited)
       
      Six Months Ended June 30,
        2025       2024  
      (In Thousands Except Share Data)
    Interest and dividend income:    
    Loans and leases $ 287,242     $ 290,850  
    Debt securities   13,456       13,358  
    Restricted equity securities   2,265       2,868  
    Short-term investments   4,837       3,738  
    Total interest and dividend income   307,800       310,814  
    Interest expense:    
    Deposits   106,160       116,605  
    Borrowed funds   27,125       32,620  
    Total interest expense   133,285       149,225  
    Net interest income   174,515       161,589  
    Provision for credit losses on loans   12,971       13,030  
    Provision (credit) for credit losses on investments   15       (83 )
    Net interest income after provision for credit losses   161,529       148,642  
    Non-interest income:    
    Deposit Fees   4,833       5,898  
    Loan Fees   865       1,491  
    Loan level derivative income, net   66       543  
    Gain on sales of loans and leases held-for-sale   288       130  
    Other   5,578       4,618  
    Total non-interest income   11,630       12,680  
    Non-interest expense:    
    Compensation and employee benefits   71,000       71,391  
    Occupancy   11,070       11,320  
    Equipment and data processing   13,853       13,763  
    Professional services   3,197       3,645  
    FDIC insurance   3,917       3,909  
    Advertising and marketing   2,239       3,078  
    Amortization of identified intangible assets   2,861       3,377  
    Merger and restructuring expense   1,410       823  
    Other   8,536       8,892  
    Total non-interest expense   118,083       120,198  
    Income before provision for income taxes   55,076       41,124  
    Provision for income taxes   13,950       10,087  
    Net income $ 41,126     $ 31,037  
    Earnings per common share:    
    Basic $ 0.46     $ 0.35  
    Diluted $ 0.46     $ 0.35  
    Weighted average common shares outstanding during the period:  
    Basic   89,104,060       88,899,635  
    Diluted   89,590,267       89,201,912  
    Dividends paid per common share $ 0.270     $ 0.270  
    BROOKLINE BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    Asset Quality Analysis (Unaudited)
      At and for the Three Months Ended
        June 30,
    2025
          March 31,
    2025
          December 31,
    2024
          September 30,
    2024
          June 30,
    2024
     
      (Dollars in Thousands)
    NONPERFORMING ASSETS:          
    Loans and leases accounted for on a nonaccrual basis:          
    Commercial real estate mortgage $ 987     $ 10,842     $ 11,525     $ 11,595     $ 11,659  
    Multi-family mortgage   1,433       6,576       6,596       1,751        
    Total commercial real estate loans   2,420       17,418       18,121       13,346       11,659  
               
    Commercial   8,687       7,415       14,676       15,734       16,636  
    Equipment financing   46,067       32,975       31,509       37,223       27,128  
    Total commercial loans and leases   54,754       40,390       46,185       52,957       43,764  
               
    Residential mortgage   3,572       3,962       3,999       3,862       4,495  
    Home equity   1,561       1,333       1,043       1,076       790  
    Other consumer   1       1       1       1       1  
    Total consumer loans   5,134       5,296       5,043       4,939       5,286  
               
    Total nonaccrual loans and leases   62,308       63,104       69,349       71,242       60,709  
               
    Other real estate owned   700       700       700       780       780  
    Other repossessed assets   588       217       403       799       1,194  
    Total nonperforming assets $ 63,596     $ 64,021     $ 70,452     $ 72,821     $ 62,683  
               
    Loans and leases past due greater than 90 days and still accruing $ 24,899     $ 3,009     $ 811     $ 16,091     $ 4,994  
               
    Nonperforming loans and leases as a percentage of total loans and leases   0.65 %     0.65 %     0.71 %     0.73 %     0.62 %
    Nonperforming assets as a percentage of total assets   0.55 %     0.56 %     0.59 %     0.62 %     0.54 %
               
    PROVISION AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES:      
    Allowance for loan and lease losses at beginning of period $ 124,145     $ 125,083     $ 127,316     $ 121,750     $ 120,124  
    Charge-offs   (5,601 )     (9,073 )     (8,414 )     (4,183 )     (8,823 )
    Recoveries   474       1,476       1,162       375       436  
    Net charge-offs   (5,127 )     (7,597 )     (7,252 )     (3,808 )     (8,387 )
    Provision for loan and lease losses excluding unfunded commitments *   7,707       6,659       5,019       9,374       10,013  
    Allowance for loan and lease losses at end of period $ 126,725     $ 124,145     $ 125,083     $ 127,316     $ 121,750  
               
    Allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total loans and leases   1.32 %     1.29 %     1.28 %     1.31 %     1.25 %
               
    NET CHARGE-OFFS:          
    Commercial real estate loans $ 3,524     $     $     $     $ 3,819  
    Commercial loans and leases   1,640       7,647       7,257       3,797       4,571  
    Consumer loans   (37 )     (50 )     (5 )     11       (3 )
    Total net charge-offs $ 5,127     $ 7,597     $ 7,252     $ 3,808     $ 8,387  
               
    Net loan and lease charge-offs as a percentage of average loans and leases (annualized)   0.21 %     0.31 %     0.30 %     0.16 %     0.35 %
               
    *Provision for loan and lease losses does not include (credit) provision of $(0.7 million), $(0.7 million), $(0.9 million), $(4.5 million), and $(4.4 million) for credit losses on unfunded commitments during the three months ended June 30, 2025, March 31, 2025, December 31, 2024, September 30, 2024, and June 30, 2024, respectively.          
    BROOKLINE BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    Average Yields / Costs (Unaudited)
      Three Months Ended
      June 30,
    2025

      March 31,
    2025
      June 30,
    2024
      Average Balance   Interest (1)   Average Yield/ Cost   Average Balance   Interest (1)   Average Yield/ Cost
      Average Balance   Interest (1)   Average Yield/ Cost
      (Dollars in Thousands)
    Assets:                                                                      
    Interest-earning assets:                                                                      
    Investments:                                                                      
    Debt securities (2) $ 874,212     $ 6,752       3.09 %   $ 888,913     $ 6,814       3.07 %   $ 846,469     $ 6,510       3.08 %
    Restricted equity securities (2)   65,724       1,062       6.46 %     69,784       1,204       6.90 %     71,696       1,375       7.67 %
    Short-term investments   215,982       2,386       4.42 %     202,953       2,451       4.83 %     143,800       1,914       5.33 %
    Total investments   1,155,918       10,200       3.53 %     1,161,650       10,469       3.60 %     1,061,965       9,799       3.69 %
    Loans and Leases:                            
    Commercial real estate loans (3)   5,533,208       77,136       5.51 %     5,651,390       77,243       5.47 %     5,754,901       81,565       5.61 %
    Commercial loans (3)   1,286,908       20,757       6.38 %     1,237,078       19,698       6.37 %     1,069,154       17,672       6.54 %
    Equipment financing (3)   1,240,128       25,069       8.09 %     1,281,425       25,965       8.11 %     1,374,217       26,255       7.64 %
    Consumer loans (3)   1,556,254       21,437       5.51 %     1,548,973       20,861       5.41 %     1,488,587       20,291       5.46 %
    Total loans and leases   9,616,498       144,399       6.01 %     9,718,866       143,767       5.92 %     9,686,859       145,783       6.02 %
    Total interest-earning assets   10,772,416       154,599       5.74 %     10,880,516       154,236       5.67 %     10,748,824       155,582       5.79 %
    Non-interest-earning assets   630,518               662,814             704,570          
    Total assets $ 11,402,934             $ 11,543,330           $ 11,453,394          
                                 
    Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity:                            
    Interest-bearing liabilities:                            
    Deposits:                            
    NOW accounts $ 637,786       1,034       0.65 %   $ 628,346       1,005       0.65 %   $ 659,351       1,111       0.68 %
    Savings accounts   1,780,838       10,692       2.41 %     1,743,688       10,173       2.37 %     1,731,388       11,874       2.76 %
    Money market accounts   2,189,373       13,990       2.56 %     2,187,581       13,587       2.52 %     2,026,780       15,520       3.08 %
    Certificates of deposit   1,879,749       18,437       3.93 %     1,886,386       19,593       4.21 %     1,699,510       18,717       4.43 %
    Brokered deposit accounts   748,205       8,529       4.57 %     767,275       9,120       4.82 %     958,146       12,499       5.25 %
    Total interest-bearing deposits   7,235,951       52,682       2.92 %     7,213,276       53,478       3.01 %     7,075,175       59,721       3.39 %
    Borrowings                            
    Advances from the FHLB   904,399       10,422       4.56 %     1,007,508       11,847       4.70 %     1,049,609       12,894       4.86 %
    Subordinated debentures and notes   84,380       1,718       8.14 %     84,345       1,701       8.07 %     84,241       1,375       6.53 %
    Other borrowed funds   46,086       565       4.93 %     71,462       872       4.95 %     103,753       1,364       5.29 %
    Total borrowings   1,034,865       12,705       4.86 %     1,163,315       14,420       4.96 %     1,237,603       15,633       5.00 %
    Total interest-bearing liabilities   8,270,816       65,387       3.17 %     8,376,591       67,898       3.29 %     8,312,778       75,354       3.65 %
    Non-interest-bearing liabilities:                            
    Demand checking accounts   1,654,594               1,680,527             1,646,869          
    Other non-interest-bearing liabilities   225,469               251,011             300,362          
    Total liabilities   10,150,879               10,308,129             10,260,009          
    Stockholders’ equity   1,252,055               1,235,201             1,193,385          
    Total liabilities and equity $ 11,402,934             $ 11,543,330           $ 11,453,394          
    Net interest income (tax-equivalent basis) /Interest-rate spread (4)       89,212       2.57 %       86,338       2.38 %       80,228       2.14 %
    Less adjustment of tax-exempt income       527             508           227      
    Net interest income     $ 88,685           $ 85,830         $ 80,001      
    Net interest margin (5)           3.32 %           3.22 %           3.00 %
                                 
    (1) Tax-exempt income on debt securities, equity securities and revenue bonds included in commercial real estate loans is included on a tax-equivalent basis.
    (2) Average balances include unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities. Dividend payments may not be consistent and average yield on equity securities may vary from month to month.
    (3) Loans on nonaccrual status are included in the average balances.
    (4) Interest rate spread represents the difference between the yield on interest-earning assets and the cost of interest-bearing liabilities.
    (5) Net interest margin represents net interest income (tax-equivalent basis) divided by average interest-earning assets on an actual/actual basis.
    BROOKLINE BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    Average Yields / Costs (Unaudited)
      Six Months Ended
      June 30, 2025   June 30, 2024
      Average
    Balance
      Interest (1)   Average Yield/
    Cost

      Average
    Balance
      Interest (1)   Average Yield/
    Cost
          
      (Dollars in Thousands)
    Assets:                                              
    Interest-earning assets:                                              
    Investments:                                              
    Debt securities (2) $ 881,522     $ 13,566       3.08 %   $ 869,848     $ 13,437       3.09 %
    Restricted equity securities (2)   67,743       2,266       6.69 %     74,015       2,868       7.75 %
    Short-term investments   209,503       4,837       4.62 %     137,284       3,738       5.45 %
    Total investments   1,158,768       20,669       3.57 %     1,081,147       20,043       3.71 %
    Loans and Leases:                  
    Commercial real estate loans (3)   5,591,973       154,379       5.49 %     5,758,318       162,614       5.59 %
    Commercial loans (3)   1,262,130       40,455       6.38 %     1,047,810       35,179       6.64 %
    Equipment financing (3)   1,260,663       51,034       8.10 %     1,374,322       53,150       7.73 %
    Consumer loans (3)   1,552,633       42,298       5.46 %     1,485,702       40,269       5.43 %
    Total loans and leases   9,667,399       288,166       5.96 %     9,666,152       291,212       6.03 %
    Total interest-earning assets   10,826,167       308,835       5.71 %     10,747,299       311,255       5.79 %
    Non-interest-earning assets   646,577             684,343        
    Total assets $ 11,472,744           $ 11,431,642        
                       
    Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity:                  
    Interest-bearing liabilities:                  
    Deposits:                  
    NOW accounts $ 633,092       2,039       0.65 %   $ 665,632       2,372       0.72 %
    Savings accounts   1,762,366       20,865       2.39 %     1,712,804       23,226       2.73 %
    Money market accounts   2,188,482       27,577       2.54 %     2,051,542       31,474       3.09 %
    Certificates of deposit   1,883,049       38,030       4.07 %     1,661,814       35,389       4.28 %
    Brokered deposit accounts   757,687       17,649       4.70 %     927,465       24,144       5.23 %
    Total interest-bearing deposits   7,224,676       106,160       2.96 %     7,019,257       116,605       3.34 %
    Borrowings                  
    Advances from the FHLB   955,669       22,269       4.63 %     1,107,071       27,527       4.92 %
    Subordinated debentures and notes   84,363       3,419       8.11 %     84,223       2,752       6.54 %
    Other borrowed funds   58,704       1,437       4.94 %     98,406       2,341       4.78 %
    Total borrowings   1,098,736       27,125       4.91 %     1,289,700       32,620       5.00 %
    Total interest-bearing liabilities   8,323,412       133,285       3.23 %     8,308,957       149,225       3.61 %
    Non-interest-bearing liabilities:                  
        Demand checking accounts   1,667,489             1,635,690        
        Other non-interest-bearing liabilities   238,169             289,351        
    Total liabilities   10,229,070             10,233,998        
    Stockholders’ equity   1,243,674             1,197,644        
    Total liabilities and equity $ 11,472,744           $ 11,431,642        
    Net interest income (tax-equivalent basis) /Interest-rate spread (4)       175,550       2.48 %         162,030       2.18 %
    Less adjustment of tax-exempt income       1,035             441    
    Net interest income     $ 174,515           $ 161,589    
    Net interest margin (5)           3.27 %             3.03 %
                       
    (1) Tax-exempt income on debt securities, equity securities and revenue bonds included in commercial real estate loans is included on a tax-equivalent basis.
    (2) Average balances include unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities. Dividend payments may not be consistent and average yield on equity securities may vary from month to month.
    (3) Loans on nonaccrual status are included in the average balances.
    (4) Interest rate spread represents the difference between the yield on interest-earning assets and the cost of interest-bearing liabilities.
    (5) Net interest margin represents net interest income (tax-equivalent basis) divided by average interest-earning assets on an actual/actual basis.
    BROOKLINE BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    Non-GAAP Financial Information (Unaudited)
      At and for the Three Months Ended
    March 31,
      At and for the Six Months Ended
    June 30,
        2025       2024       2025       2024  
    Reconciliation Table – Non-GAAP Financial Information (Dollars in Thousands Except Share Data)   (Dollars in Thousands Except Share Data)
                   
    Reported Pretax Income $ 29,594     $ 21,645     $ 55,076     $ 41,124  
    Add:              
    Merger and restructuring expense   439       823       1,410       823  
    Operating Pretax Income $ 30,033     $ 22,468     $ 56,486     $ 41,947  
    Effective tax rate   25.3 %     24.4 %     24.8 %     24.5 %
    Provision for income taxes   7,590       5,473       14,008       10,289  
    Operating earnings after tax $ 22,443     $ 16,995     $ 42,478     $ 31,658  
                   
    Operating earnings per common share:              
    Basic $ 0.25     $ 0.19     $ 0.48     $ 0.36  
    Diluted $ 0.25     $ 0.19     $ 0.47     $ 0.35  
                   
    Weighted average common shares outstanding during the period:              
    Basic   89,104,605       88,904,692       89,104,060       88,899,635  
    Diluted   89,612,781       89,222,315       89,590,267       89,201,912  
                   
    Return on average assets *   0.77 %     0.57 %     0.72 %     0.54 %
    Add:              
    Merger and restructuring expense (after-tax) *   0.01 %     0.02 %     0.02 %     0.01 %
    Operating return on average assets *   0.78 %     0.59 %     0.74 %     0.55 %
                   
    Return on average tangible assets *   0.79 %     0.59 %     0.73 %     0.56 %
    Add:              
    Merger and restructuring expense (after-tax) *   0.01 %     0.02 %     0.02 %     0.01 %
    Operating return on average tangible assets *   0.80 %     0.61 %     0.75 %     0.57 %
                   
                   
    Return on average stockholders’ equity *   7.04 %     5.49 %     6.61 %     5.18 %
    Add:              
    Merger and restructuring expense (after-tax) *   0.10 %     0.21 %     0.17 %     0.10 %
    Operating return on average stockholders’ equity *   7.14 %     5.70 %     6.78 %     5.28 %
                   
                   
    Return on average tangible stockholders’ equity *   8.85 %     7.04 %     8.34 %     6.65 %
    Add:              
    Merger and restructuring expense (after-tax) *   0.13 %     0.27 %     0.21 %     0.13 %
    Operating return on average tangible stockholders’ equity *   8.98 %     7.31 %     8.55 %     6.78 %
                   
    * Ratios at and for the three months and six months ended are annualized.              
      At and for the Three Months Ended
      June 30,
    2025
    March 31,
    2025
      December 31,
    2024
      September 30,
    2024
      June 30,
    2024
      (Dollars in Thousands)
                     
    Net income, as reported $ 22,026   $ 19,100     $ 17,536     $ 20,142     $ 16,372  
                     
    Average total assets $ 11,402,934   $ 11,543,330     $ 11,580,572     $ 11,451,338     $ 11,453,394  
    Less: Average goodwill and average identified intangible assets, net   256,508     257,941       259,496       261,188       262,859  
    Average tangible assets $ 11,146,426   $ 11,285,389     $ 11,321,076     $ 11,190,150     $ 11,190,535  
                     
    Return on average tangible assets (annualized)   0.79 %   0.68 %     0.62 %     0.72 %     0.59 %
                     
    Average total stockholders’ equity $ 1,252,055   $ 1,235,201     $ 1,232,527     $ 1,216,037     $ 1,193,385  
    Less: Average goodwill and average identified intangible assets, net   256,508     257,941       259,496       261,188       262,859  
    Average tangible stockholders’ equity $ 995,547   $ 977,260     $ 973,031     $ 954,849     $ 930,526  
                     
    Return on average tangible stockholders’ equity (annualized)   8.85 %   7.82 %     7.21 %     8.44 %     7.04 %
                     
    Total stockholders’ equity $ 1,254,171   $ 1,240,182     $ 1,221,939     $ 1,230,362     $ 1,198,480  
    Less:                
    Goodwill   241,222     241,222       241,222       241,222       241,222  
    Identified intangible assets, net   14,600     16,030       17,461       19,162       20,830  
    Tangible stockholders’ equity $ 998,349   $ 982,930     $ 963,256     $ 969,978     $ 936,428  
                     
    Total assets $ 11,568,745   $ 11,519,869     $ 11,905,326     $ 11,676,721     $ 11,635,292  
    Less:                
    Goodwill   241,222     241,222       241,222       241,222       241,222  
    Identified intangible assets, net   14,600     16,030       17,461       19,162       20,830  
    Tangible assets $ 11,312,923   $ 11,262,617     $ 11,646,643     $ 11,416,337     $ 11,373,240  
                     
    Tangible stockholders’ equity to tangible assets   8.82 %   8.73 %     8.27 %     8.50 %     8.23 %
                     
    Tangible stockholders’ equity $ 998,349   $ 982,930     $ 963,256     $ 969,978     $ 936,428  
                     
    Number of common shares issued   96,998,075     96,998,075       96,998,075       96,998,075       96,998,075  
    Less:                
    Treasury shares   7,039,136     7,037,610       7,019,384       7,015,843       7,373,009  
    Unvested restricted shares   854,334     855,860       880,248       883,789       713,443  
    Number of common shares outstanding   89,104,605     89,104,605       89,098,443       89,098,443       88,911,623  
                     
    Tangible book value per common share $ 11.20   $ 11.03     $ 10.81     $ 10.89     $ 10.53  

    PDF available: http://ml.globenewswire.com/Resource/Download/713b7b8a-a804-4b26-a467-f10b0d266b1b 

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-Evening Report: Immigration courts hiding the names of ICE lawyers goes against centuries of precedent and legal ethics requiring transparency in courts

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Cassandra Burke Robertson, Professor of Law and Director of the Center for Professional Ethics, Case Western Reserve University

    Some immigration courts have allowed ICE attorneys to conceal their names during proceedings. Jacob Wackerhausen/iStock via Getty Images

    Something unusual is happening in U.S. immigration courts. Government lawyers are refusing to give their names during public hearings.

    In June 2025, Immigration Judge ShaSha Xu in New York City reportedly told lawyers in her courtroom: “We’re not really doing names publicly.” Only the government lawyers’ names were hidden – the immigrants’ attorneys had to give their names as usual. Xu cited privacy concerns, saying, “Things lately have changed.”

    When one immigration lawyer objected that the court record would be incomplete without the government attorney’s name, Xu reportedly refused to provide it. In another case, New York immigration Judge James McCarthy in July referred to the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or ICE, attorney as merely “Department” throughout the hearing.

    New York immigration Judge Shirley Lazare-Raphael told The Intercept that some ICE attorneys believe it is “dangerous to state their names publicly.” This follows a broader pattern of ICE agents wearing masks during arrests to hide their identities.

    This secrecy violates a fundamental principle that has protected Americans for centuries: open courts. Here’s how those courts operate and why the principle governing them matters.

    Hiding of ICE attorneys’ names in court fits a broader pattern seen here outside a New York immigration courtroom of ICE agents wearing masks.
    AP Photo/Olga Fedorova

    ‘Presumption of openness’

    The U.S. legal system is built on openness, with multiple layers of legal protection that guarantee public access to court proceedings.

    This tradition of open courts developed as a direct rejection of secret judicial proceedings that had been used to abuse power in England. The notorious Star Chamber operated in secret from the 15th to 17th centuries, initially trying people “too powerful to be brought before ordinary common-law courts.”

    But the Star Chamber eventually became a tool of oppression, using torture to obtain confessions and punishing jurors who ruled against the Crown. Parliament abolished it in 1641 after widespread abuses.

    By the time American colonial courts were established, the reaction against the Star Chamber had already shaped English legal thinking toward openness. American courts adopted this principle of transparency from the beginning, rejecting the secretive proceedings that had enabled abuse.

    Today, the term “star chamber” refers to any secret court proceeding that seems grossly unfair or is used to persecute individuals.

    In the U.S., courts have repeatedly emphasized that “justice faces its gravest threat when courts dispense it secretly.” The First Amendment gives the public a right to observe judicial proceedings. The Supreme Court has ruled that “a presumption of openness inheres in the very nature of a criminal trial under our system of justice.”

    Every federal appeals court has recognized that this constitutional right extends to civil cases too, with some exceptions such as protecting “the parties’ privacy, confidential business information, or trade secrets.” Federal court rules require that trials be “conducted in open court” and that witness testimony be “taken in open court unless otherwise provided.”

    Many state constitutions also guarantee open courts – such as Oregon’s mandate that “no court shall be secret.”

    While there’s no explicit law requiring attorneys to be publicly named, there’s also no policy allowing their names to be kept secret. The presumption is always toward openness.

    In response to these recent developments, law professor Elissa Steglich said that she’d “never heard of someone in open court not being identified,” and that failing to identify an attorney could impair accountability “if there are unethical or professional concerns.”

    Rules for anonymity

    Courts sometimes allow anonymity, but only in specific circumstances.

    Juries can be anonymous when there’s “substantial danger of harm or undue influence,” as legal expert Michael Crowell writes – like in high-profile organized crime cases or when defendants have tried to intimidate witnesses before. Even then, the lawyers still know the jurors’ names.

    Similarly, parties to a lawsuit can sometimes use pseudonyms like “Jane Doe” when the case involves highly sensitive matters such as sexual abuse, or when there’s a real risk of physical retaliation.

    But these rare exceptions require careful court review.

    What’s happening with ICE attorneys is different. There’s no formal court ruling allowing it, no specific safety findings and no established legal process.

    Immigration courts have fewer protections

    Immigration courts operate differently from regular federal courts. They are so-called “administrative courts” that are part of the executive branch, not the judicial branch.

    These courts decide claims involving an individual’s right to stay in the U.S., either when the government seeks to remove someone from the country for violating immigration law or when an individual seeks to stay in the country through the asylum process.

    Immigration judges lack the lifetime job protections that regular federal judges have. As executive branch government employees, they can be hired and fired, just like other Department of Justice employees.

    People in immigration court also have fewer procedural protections than criminal defendants. They have no right to court-appointed counsel and must represent themselves unless they can afford to hire an attorney. The majority of immigrants appear without an attorney. Outcomes are better for those who can afford to hire counsel.

    Immigration court records are also less accessible to the public than other federal court proceedings.

    For years, the Board of Immigration Appeals, the nation’s highest immigration court, made less than 1% of its opinions publicly available. A federal court ruled that public disclosure was required; the Board of Immigration Appeals now posts its decisions online.

    However, lower immigration court decisions are rarely made public.

    Because immigration courts operate with less oversight than regular federal courts, public observation becomes more critical.

    Open courts aren’t just about legal procedure – they’re about democracy itself. When the public can observe how justice is administered, it builds confidence that the system is fair.

    Federal agents patrol the halls of immigration court at the Jacob K. Javitz Federal Building on July 21, 2025, in New York City.
    Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images

    Court watching protects transparency

    Court watching has become an important way for citizens to ensure due process is honored, especially in immigration cases.

    Observers can monitor whether proper legal procedures are being followed. They can watch for signs that attorneys are prepared, treating people respectfully and following court rules – regardless of whether those attorneys identify themselves.

    Observers help track trends such as lack of legal representation, language barriers or procedural unfairness that can inform advocacy for reforms. This kind of public oversight is especially important in immigration court, where people often don’t have lawyers and may not understand their rights.

    When community members bear witness to these proceedings, it helps ensure the system operates fairly and transparently.

    Professional ethics and accountability

    As a law professor who runs a law school’s Center for Professional Ethics, I can say that while there’s no specific law forcing ICE attorneys to identify themselves, they are still bound by rules of professional conduct that require accountability and transparency.

    State bar associations have clear standards about attorney conduct in court proceedings. The American Bar Association’s Model Rules of Professional Conduct emphasize that lawyers are “officers of the legal system” with duties to uphold its integrity.

    Immigration judges, despite being government employees rather than lifetime-tenured federal judges, are also bound by judicial conduct codes that require them to uphold public confidence in the justice system. When judges allow or encourage anonymity without formal procedures or safety findings, they risk violating these ethical obligations.

    Bar associations can investigate professional conduct violations and impose sanctions ranging from reprimands to suspension or disbarment. While enforcement against federal government lawyers has historically been uncommon, sustained documentation by court observers can provide the evidence needed for formal complaints.

    While government attorneys, judges and other court personnel may face real safety concerns, hiding their identities in open court is unprecedented and breaks with centuries of legal tradition that requires accountability and transparency in our justice system.

    As pressure mounts to process immigration cases quickly, courts are ethically and legally bound to ensure that speed doesn’t come at the expense of fundamental fairness and transparency.

    Cassandra Burke Robertson does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Immigration courts hiding the names of ICE lawyers goes against centuries of precedent and legal ethics requiring transparency in courts – https://theconversation.com/immigration-courts-hiding-the-names-of-ice-lawyers-goes-against-centuries-of-precedent-and-legal-ethics-requiring-transparency-in-courts-261452

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Wales: Welsh government accused of funding companies exporting arms to Israel despite public assurances

    Source: Amnesty International –

    FOI reveals £500,000 grant to weapons supplier  

    Weapons components supplied for F-35s and Apache gunships 

    ‘Public money must never help fuel war crimes’ – Glenn Page 

    Amnesty International has condemned the Welsh Government for awarding public funds to a weapons manufacturer that exports military equipment to Israel – despite First Minister claims to the contrary.  

    In December 2024, the First Minister told the Senedd: “No Welsh Government financial support has been provided to companies in Wales who export arms to Israel since the 7 October attacks.” 

    But Freedom of Information requests submitted by Amnesty reveal that the Welsh Government awarded £500,000 in grant funding to SENIOR, a company that exports military equipment directly to Israel, including component parts for F-35 fighter jets and Apache gunships. 

    Glenn Page, Amnesty International’s Government and Political Relations Manager in Wales, said: 

    “The Welsh Government has quietly funded a company supplying weapons to Israel – despite mounting evidence of war crimes and genocide being committed by Israel against Palestinian people in Gaza.  

    “This directly contradicts what the First Minister told the public. It’s deeply concerning that we only know this because of FOI requests – not because of transparency from the Welsh Government. 

    “Public money must never help fuel war crimes. There must be full transparency and accountability, beginning with an urgent, long-overdue review of public funding and investment, and the immediate introduction of a robust framework for human rights due diligence.”

    Further FOI requests by Amnesty exposed that the Welsh Government does not conduct human rights due diligence checks before awarding public money to private companies. This means there are no guarantees that public money isn’t supporting weapons used in potential breaches of international law.  

    Earlier this year, the Senedd reiterated its support for a permanent ceasefire in Gaza and urged the Welsh Government to “review public sector procurement and investments to ensure that ethical standards are upheld.” Despite supporting this call, no review has taken place. 

    Amnesty International is calling for the Welsh Government to: 

    • Support an end to arms exports to Israel  
    • Conduct an urgent and transparent review of all public funding, procurement, and investment policies. 
    • Introduce mandatory human rights due diligence checks for any company receiving public money. 

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Portmahomack to Tain bus pilot to start

    Source: Scotland – Highland Council

    The Highland Council has announced that a 2 day a week pilot bus service from Portmahomack to Tain will start on Thursday 24 July.

    The 416A service will operate on Tuesdays and Thursdays.

    The first bus of the day will depart from Main Street Portmahomack at 9:40, stopping at Tarrel 9:45am and Shore Road in Inver at 09:51 before arriving in Tain at 10.00am. Another two journeys from Portmahomack will depart at 13:40 and 17:40.

    The two return journeys each Tuesday and Thursday from Tain to Portmahomack depart at 13:15 and 17:15.

    During the summer school holidays, the service will be jointly delivered by The Highland Council and by Rapsons. From Tuesday 19 August, the service will be delivered entirely by Rapsons.

    Chair of The Highland Council’s Economy and Infrastructure Committee, Councillor Ken Gowans said: “As this new twice a week bus is a pilot, people living and visiting in these communities are very much encouraged to use the service. As a bonus, during the school holidays, we will not be charging, so everyone can travel back and forth between Portmahomack and Tain for free.”

    “The pilot will run for 3 months, after which we will assess usage patterns and user feedback.”

    23 Jul 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI Russia: 3 killed in shooting in Northern Ireland

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    LONDON, July 23 (Xinhua) — Two children and a woman were killed in a shooting incident in Northern Ireland’s County Fermanagh on Wednesday morning, local police said.

    All the victims were members of the same family, District Commander Inspector Robert McGowan told a news conference.

    “We can advise that there is currently no threat to the public,” a Police Service of Northern Ireland spokesman said.

    Law enforcement officials say the motive for the shooting remains unclear. A case of premeditated murder has been opened, and the investigation is in its early stages. –0–

    Please note: This information is raw content obtained directly from the source of the information. It is an accurate report of what the source claims and does not necessarily reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    .

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Analysis: Immigration courts hiding the names of ICE lawyers goes against centuries of precedent and legal ethics requiring transparency in courts

    Source: The Conversation – USA – By Cassandra Burke Robertson, Professor of Law and Director of the Center for Professional Ethics, Case Western Reserve University

    Some immigration courts have allowed ICE attorneys to conceal their names during proceedings. Jacob Wackerhausen/iStock via Getty Images

    Something unusual is happening in U.S. immigration courts. Government lawyers are refusing to give their names during public hearings.

    In June 2025, Immigration Judge ShaSha Xu in New York City reportedly told lawyers in her courtroom: “We’re not really doing names publicly.” Only the government lawyers’ names were hidden – the immigrants’ attorneys had to give their names as usual. Xu cited privacy concerns, saying, “Things lately have changed.”

    When one immigration lawyer objected that the court record would be incomplete without the government attorney’s name, Xu reportedly refused to provide it. In another case, New York immigration Judge James McCarthy in July referred to the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or ICE, attorney as merely “Department” throughout the hearing.

    New York immigration Judge Shirley Lazare-Raphael told The Intercept that some ICE attorneys believe it is “dangerous to state their names publicly.” This follows a broader pattern of ICE agents wearing masks during arrests to hide their identities.

    This secrecy violates a fundamental principle that has protected Americans for centuries: open courts. Here’s how those courts operate and why the principle governing them matters.

    Hiding of ICE attorneys’ names in court fits a broader pattern seen here outside a New York immigration courtroom of ICE agents wearing masks.
    AP Photo/Olga Fedorova

    ‘Presumption of openness’

    The U.S. legal system is built on openness, with multiple layers of legal protection that guarantee public access to court proceedings.

    This tradition of open courts developed as a direct rejection of secret judicial proceedings that had been used to abuse power in England. The notorious Star Chamber operated in secret from the 15th to 17th centuries, initially trying people “too powerful to be brought before ordinary common-law courts.”

    But the Star Chamber eventually became a tool of oppression, using torture to obtain confessions and punishing jurors who ruled against the Crown. Parliament abolished it in 1641 after widespread abuses.

    By the time American colonial courts were established, the reaction against the Star Chamber had already shaped English legal thinking toward openness. American courts adopted this principle of transparency from the beginning, rejecting the secretive proceedings that had enabled abuse.

    Today, the term “star chamber” refers to any secret court proceeding that seems grossly unfair or is used to persecute individuals.

    In the U.S., courts have repeatedly emphasized that “justice faces its gravest threat when courts dispense it secretly.” The First Amendment gives the public a right to observe judicial proceedings. The Supreme Court has ruled that “a presumption of openness inheres in the very nature of a criminal trial under our system of justice.”

    Every federal appeals court has recognized that this constitutional right extends to civil cases too, with some exceptions such as protecting “the parties’ privacy, confidential business information, or trade secrets.” Federal court rules require that trials be “conducted in open court” and that witness testimony be “taken in open court unless otherwise provided.”

    Many state constitutions also guarantee open courts – such as Oregon’s mandate that “no court shall be secret.”

    While there’s no explicit law requiring attorneys to be publicly named, there’s also no policy allowing their names to be kept secret. The presumption is always toward openness.

    In response to these recent developments, law professor Elissa Steglich said that she’d “never heard of someone in open court not being identified,” and that failing to identify an attorney could impair accountability “if there are unethical or professional concerns.”

    Rules for anonymity

    Courts sometimes allow anonymity, but only in specific circumstances.

    Juries can be anonymous when there’s “substantial danger of harm or undue influence,” as legal expert Michael Crowell writes – like in high-profile organized crime cases or when defendants have tried to intimidate witnesses before. Even then, the lawyers still know the jurors’ names.

    Similarly, parties to a lawsuit can sometimes use pseudonyms like “Jane Doe” when the case involves highly sensitive matters such as sexual abuse, or when there’s a real risk of physical retaliation.

    But these rare exceptions require careful court review.

    What’s happening with ICE attorneys is different. There’s no formal court ruling allowing it, no specific safety findings and no established legal process.

    Immigration courts have fewer protections

    Immigration courts operate differently from regular federal courts. They are so-called “administrative courts” that are part of the executive branch, not the judicial branch.

    These courts decide claims involving an individual’s right to stay in the U.S., either when the government seeks to remove someone from the country for violating immigration law or when an individual seeks to stay in the country through the asylum process.

    Immigration judges lack the lifetime job protections that regular federal judges have. As executive branch government employees, they can be hired and fired, just like other Department of Justice employees.

    People in immigration court also have fewer procedural protections than criminal defendants. They have no right to court-appointed counsel and must represent themselves unless they can afford to hire an attorney. The majority of immigrants appear without an attorney. Outcomes are better for those who can afford to hire counsel.

    Immigration court records are also less accessible to the public than other federal court proceedings.

    For years, the Board of Immigration Appeals, the nation’s highest immigration court, made less than 1% of its opinions publicly available. A federal court ruled that public disclosure was required; the Board of Immigration Appeals now posts its decisions online.

    However, lower immigration court decisions are rarely made public.

    Because immigration courts operate with less oversight than regular federal courts, public observation becomes more critical.

    Open courts aren’t just about legal procedure – they’re about democracy itself. When the public can observe how justice is administered, it builds confidence that the system is fair.

    Federal agents patrol the halls of immigration court at the Jacob K. Javitz Federal Building on July 21, 2025, in New York City.
    Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images

    Court watching protects transparency

    Court watching has become an important way for citizens to ensure due process is honored, especially in immigration cases.

    Observers can monitor whether proper legal procedures are being followed. They can watch for signs that attorneys are prepared, treating people respectfully and following court rules – regardless of whether those attorneys identify themselves.

    Observers help track trends such as lack of legal representation, language barriers or procedural unfairness that can inform advocacy for reforms. This kind of public oversight is especially important in immigration court, where people often don’t have lawyers and may not understand their rights.

    When community members bear witness to these proceedings, it helps ensure the system operates fairly and transparently.

    Professional ethics and accountability

    As a law professor who runs a law school’s Center for Professional Ethics, I can say that while there’s no specific law forcing ICE attorneys to identify themselves, they are still bound by rules of professional conduct that require accountability and transparency.

    State bar associations have clear standards about attorney conduct in court proceedings. The American Bar Association’s Model Rules of Professional Conduct emphasize that lawyers are “officers of the legal system” with duties to uphold its integrity.

    Immigration judges, despite being government employees rather than lifetime-tenured federal judges, are also bound by judicial conduct codes that require them to uphold public confidence in the justice system. When judges allow or encourage anonymity without formal procedures or safety findings, they risk violating these ethical obligations.

    Bar associations can investigate professional conduct violations and impose sanctions ranging from reprimands to suspension or disbarment. While enforcement against federal government lawyers has historically been uncommon, sustained documentation by court observers can provide the evidence needed for formal complaints.

    While government attorneys, judges and other court personnel may face real safety concerns, hiding their identities in open court is unprecedented and breaks with centuries of legal tradition that requires accountability and transparency in our justice system.

    As pressure mounts to process immigration cases quickly, courts are ethically and legally bound to ensure that speed doesn’t come at the expense of fundamental fairness and transparency.

    Cassandra Burke Robertson does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Immigration courts hiding the names of ICE lawyers goes against centuries of precedent and legal ethics requiring transparency in courts – https://theconversation.com/immigration-courts-hiding-the-names-of-ice-lawyers-goes-against-centuries-of-precedent-and-legal-ethics-requiring-transparency-in-courts-261452

    MIL OSI Analysis

  • MIL-OSI Analysis: Immigration courts hiding the names of ICE lawyers goes against centuries of precedent and legal ethics requiring transparency in courts

    Source: The Conversation – USA – By Cassandra Burke Robertson, Professor of Law and Director of the Center for Professional Ethics, Case Western Reserve University

    Some immigration courts have allowed ICE attorneys to conceal their names during proceedings. Jacob Wackerhausen/iStock via Getty Images

    Something unusual is happening in U.S. immigration courts. Government lawyers are refusing to give their names during public hearings.

    In June 2025, Immigration Judge ShaSha Xu in New York City reportedly told lawyers in her courtroom: “We’re not really doing names publicly.” Only the government lawyers’ names were hidden – the immigrants’ attorneys had to give their names as usual. Xu cited privacy concerns, saying, “Things lately have changed.”

    When one immigration lawyer objected that the court record would be incomplete without the government attorney’s name, Xu reportedly refused to provide it. In another case, New York immigration Judge James McCarthy in July referred to the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or ICE, attorney as merely “Department” throughout the hearing.

    New York immigration Judge Shirley Lazare-Raphael told The Intercept that some ICE attorneys believe it is “dangerous to state their names publicly.” This follows a broader pattern of ICE agents wearing masks during arrests to hide their identities.

    This secrecy violates a fundamental principle that has protected Americans for centuries: open courts. Here’s how those courts operate and why the principle governing them matters.

    Hiding of ICE attorneys’ names in court fits a broader pattern seen here outside a New York immigration courtroom of ICE agents wearing masks.
    AP Photo/Olga Fedorova

    ‘Presumption of openness’

    The U.S. legal system is built on openness, with multiple layers of legal protection that guarantee public access to court proceedings.

    This tradition of open courts developed as a direct rejection of secret judicial proceedings that had been used to abuse power in England. The notorious Star Chamber operated in secret from the 15th to 17th centuries, initially trying people “too powerful to be brought before ordinary common-law courts.”

    But the Star Chamber eventually became a tool of oppression, using torture to obtain confessions and punishing jurors who ruled against the Crown. Parliament abolished it in 1641 after widespread abuses.

    By the time American colonial courts were established, the reaction against the Star Chamber had already shaped English legal thinking toward openness. American courts adopted this principle of transparency from the beginning, rejecting the secretive proceedings that had enabled abuse.

    Today, the term “star chamber” refers to any secret court proceeding that seems grossly unfair or is used to persecute individuals.

    In the U.S., courts have repeatedly emphasized that “justice faces its gravest threat when courts dispense it secretly.” The First Amendment gives the public a right to observe judicial proceedings. The Supreme Court has ruled that “a presumption of openness inheres in the very nature of a criminal trial under our system of justice.”

    Every federal appeals court has recognized that this constitutional right extends to civil cases too, with some exceptions such as protecting “the parties’ privacy, confidential business information, or trade secrets.” Federal court rules require that trials be “conducted in open court” and that witness testimony be “taken in open court unless otherwise provided.”

    Many state constitutions also guarantee open courts – such as Oregon’s mandate that “no court shall be secret.”

    While there’s no explicit law requiring attorneys to be publicly named, there’s also no policy allowing their names to be kept secret. The presumption is always toward openness.

    In response to these recent developments, law professor Elissa Steglich said that she’d “never heard of someone in open court not being identified,” and that failing to identify an attorney could impair accountability “if there are unethical or professional concerns.”

    Rules for anonymity

    Courts sometimes allow anonymity, but only in specific circumstances.

    Juries can be anonymous when there’s “substantial danger of harm or undue influence,” as legal expert Michael Crowell writes – like in high-profile organized crime cases or when defendants have tried to intimidate witnesses before. Even then, the lawyers still know the jurors’ names.

    Similarly, parties to a lawsuit can sometimes use pseudonyms like “Jane Doe” when the case involves highly sensitive matters such as sexual abuse, or when there’s a real risk of physical retaliation.

    But these rare exceptions require careful court review.

    What’s happening with ICE attorneys is different. There’s no formal court ruling allowing it, no specific safety findings and no established legal process.

    Immigration courts have fewer protections

    Immigration courts operate differently from regular federal courts. They are so-called “administrative courts” that are part of the executive branch, not the judicial branch.

    These courts decide claims involving an individual’s right to stay in the U.S., either when the government seeks to remove someone from the country for violating immigration law or when an individual seeks to stay in the country through the asylum process.

    Immigration judges lack the lifetime job protections that regular federal judges have. As executive branch government employees, they can be hired and fired, just like other Department of Justice employees.

    People in immigration court also have fewer procedural protections than criminal defendants. They have no right to court-appointed counsel and must represent themselves unless they can afford to hire an attorney. The majority of immigrants appear without an attorney. Outcomes are better for those who can afford to hire counsel.

    Immigration court records are also less accessible to the public than other federal court proceedings.

    For years, the Board of Immigration Appeals, the nation’s highest immigration court, made less than 1% of its opinions publicly available. A federal court ruled that public disclosure was required; the Board of Immigration Appeals now posts its decisions online.

    However, lower immigration court decisions are rarely made public.

    Because immigration courts operate with less oversight than regular federal courts, public observation becomes more critical.

    Open courts aren’t just about legal procedure – they’re about democracy itself. When the public can observe how justice is administered, it builds confidence that the system is fair.

    Federal agents patrol the halls of immigration court at the Jacob K. Javitz Federal Building on July 21, 2025, in New York City.
    Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images

    Court watching protects transparency

    Court watching has become an important way for citizens to ensure due process is honored, especially in immigration cases.

    Observers can monitor whether proper legal procedures are being followed. They can watch for signs that attorneys are prepared, treating people respectfully and following court rules – regardless of whether those attorneys identify themselves.

    Observers help track trends such as lack of legal representation, language barriers or procedural unfairness that can inform advocacy for reforms. This kind of public oversight is especially important in immigration court, where people often don’t have lawyers and may not understand their rights.

    When community members bear witness to these proceedings, it helps ensure the system operates fairly and transparently.

    Professional ethics and accountability

    As a law professor who runs a law school’s Center for Professional Ethics, I can say that while there’s no specific law forcing ICE attorneys to identify themselves, they are still bound by rules of professional conduct that require accountability and transparency.

    State bar associations have clear standards about attorney conduct in court proceedings. The American Bar Association’s Model Rules of Professional Conduct emphasize that lawyers are “officers of the legal system” with duties to uphold its integrity.

    Immigration judges, despite being government employees rather than lifetime-tenured federal judges, are also bound by judicial conduct codes that require them to uphold public confidence in the justice system. When judges allow or encourage anonymity without formal procedures or safety findings, they risk violating these ethical obligations.

    Bar associations can investigate professional conduct violations and impose sanctions ranging from reprimands to suspension or disbarment. While enforcement against federal government lawyers has historically been uncommon, sustained documentation by court observers can provide the evidence needed for formal complaints.

    While government attorneys, judges and other court personnel may face real safety concerns, hiding their identities in open court is unprecedented and breaks with centuries of legal tradition that requires accountability and transparency in our justice system.

    As pressure mounts to process immigration cases quickly, courts are ethically and legally bound to ensure that speed doesn’t come at the expense of fundamental fairness and transparency.

    Cassandra Burke Robertson does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Immigration courts hiding the names of ICE lawyers goes against centuries of precedent and legal ethics requiring transparency in courts – https://theconversation.com/immigration-courts-hiding-the-names-of-ice-lawyers-goes-against-centuries-of-precedent-and-legal-ethics-requiring-transparency-in-courts-261452

    MIL OSI Analysis

  • MIL-OSI Canada: 3rd Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors Meeting

    Source: Government of Canada News

    Statement

    July 18, 2025

    We, the G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors (FMCBG), met on 17 and 18 July 2025, in Durban, South Africa. Under the G20 South African Presidency’s “Solidarity, Equality and Sustainability” theme, we committed to international policy cooperation to further promote global prosperity and address key shared challenges.

    Global Economy

    The global economy is facing heightened uncertainty and complex challenges, including ongoing wars and conflicts, geopolitical and trade tensions, disruptions to global supply chains, high debt levels, and frequent extreme weather events and natural disasters, which impact economic growth, financial and price stability. 

    In light of high public debt and fiscal pressures, we recognise the need to raise long-term growth potential by pursuing growth-oriented macroeconomic policies, while building fiscal buffers, ensuring fiscal sustainability, encouraging public and private investments and undertaking productivity-enhancing reforms. Structural reforms are essential for generating strong economic growth and creating more and better jobs. All excessive imbalances should be further analysed by the IMF and, if necessary and, without discrimination, addressed through country-specific reforms and multilateral coordination, in a way that contributes to an open global economy and without compromising sustainable global growth. We reaffirm our April 2021 exchange rate commitment.

    Central banks are strongly committed to ensuring price stability, consistent with their respective mandates, and will continue to adjust their policies in a data-dependent manner. Central bank independence is crucial to achieving this goal. 
     
    We emphasise the importance of strengthening multilateral cooperation to address existing and emerging risks to the global economy. We will continue to pursue efforts that advance prosperity and recognise the importance of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) to advance trade issues, and acknowledge the agreed upon rules in the WTO as an integral part of the global trading system. We recognise the WTO has challenges and needs meaningful, necessary, and comprehensive reform to improve all its functions, through innovative approaches, to be more relevant and responsive in light of today’s realities.

    We note the progress on the priorities of the Framework Working Group and look forward to the respective outcomes.  

    International Financial Architecture

    The Multilateral Development Banks (MDBs) are implementing the G20 MDB Roadmap and the recommendations from the Capital Adequacy Framework (CAF) Report. We acknowledge the progress of MDBs and the IFA Working Group in developing the Monitoring and Reporting Framework, and expect to receive the inaugural report in October. We further acknowledge CAF’s potential to help MDBs more efficiently utilise existing resources, share more risk with the private sector and utilise new instruments to increase lending capacity over the next decade. We also welcome the collaboration on blended finance among the International Finance Corporation and other MDBs. We look forward to the outcome of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development’s 2025 Shareholding Review, in line with the Lima Shareholding principles.

    We support the 17th replenishment of the African Development Fund. We acknowledge the strategic importance of an enhanced G20 partnership with African economies, including through strengthening the G20 Compact with Africa, and welcome the Presidency’s side event on Mobilising G20 Investment for Sustainable Growth in Africa. We welcome the work initiated by the Presidency on the impediments to growth and development in Africa.

    We are committed to addressing debt vulnerabilities in low- and middle-income countries in an effective, comprehensive and systematic manner. To this end, we reaffirm our commitment to further strengthen the implementation of the G20 Common Framework (CF) in a predictable, timely, orderly, and coordinated manner. We endorse the G20 note on lessons learned from initial CF cases and the document outlining debt treatment steps. We welcome that the fact sheets on CF cases are now available on the G20 and Paris Club websites to enhance information sharing. We welcome the agreement on the Memorandum of Understanding on a debt treatment between Ethiopia and its Official Creditors Committee. We furthermore call for enhanced debt transparency from all stakeholders, including private creditors.

    We urge the international community to support vulnerable countries whose debt is sustainable but are facing liquidity challenges, and encourage the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank to continue their work on feasible options to support these countries, which should be country-specific and voluntary.

    We acknowledge the G20 note on Special Drawing Rights (SDR) channelling. We note the achievement of exceeding USD 100 billion in voluntary channelling of SDRs or equivalent contributions for countries in need, and the transfer to the Poverty Reduction and Growth Trust and the Resilience and Sustainability Trust. We urge the swift delivery of pending pledges and encourage countries that are willing and legally able to explore channelling SDRs to MDBs while respecting the reserve asset status of the resulting SDR-denominated claims and ensuring their liquidity.

    We reaffirm our commitment to a strong, quota-based, and adequately resourced IMF at the centre of the Global Financial Safety Net. We have advanced the domestic approvals for our consent to the quota increase under the 16th General Review of Quotas, and we look forward to finalising this process with no further delay.  We acknowledge the importance of realignment in quota shares to better reflect members’ relative positions in the world economy while protecting the quota shares of the poorest members. We acknowledge, however, that building consensus among members on quota and governance reforms will require progress in stages.   We support the call for the IMF Executive Board to develop a set of principles guiding future discussions on IMF quotas and governance by the 2026 Spring meetings in line with the Diriyah Declaration.

    We underscore the need for enhancing the representation and voice of developing countries in decision-making in MDBs and other international economic and financial institutions. In that context, we welcome the creation of a 25th chair at the IMF Executive Board to enhance the voice and representation of Sub-Saharan Africa.

    We remain committed to promoting sustainable capital flows to EMDEs and fostering sound policy frameworks, notably central bank independence. We note the growing role of non-bank financial institutions (NBFIs) and ongoing work to understand the impact on capital flows.

    Sustainable Finance

    We note a commitment to strengthen the global sustainable finance architecture by helping to ensure robust, resilient and effective coordination among stakeholders to foster interoperability among MDBs, Vertical Climate and Environment Funds, and National Development Banks, in support of sustainability goals and national priorities, as appropriate. Scaling up co-financing and mobilising private sector resources by improving efficiency and promoting the use of innovative financial instruments is essential for developing countries’ risk-sharing in country-led climate investments.

    We acknowledge progress on tailoring key considerations that integrate adaptation and resilience into the voluntary transition plans of financial institutions and corporations. These efforts may support vulnerable sectors in moving towards sustainable and climate-resilient economies. We look forward to continued work related to more effective funding mechanisms for adaptation and promote flexible country-tailored solutions that address natural catastrophe insurance protection gaps by developing practical guidance and tools.

    We take note of the potential of high-integrity, voluntary, private-sector led carbon markets, including by promoting interoperability, accessibility, transparency and scalability. We note the efforts by the Climate Data Steering Committee to develop principles aimed towards building a Common Carbon Credit Data Model, as a voluntary tool.

    We note the progress made thus far on the multi-year G20 Sustainable Finance Roadmap which is flexible and voluntary in nature.

    Infrastructure

    Recognising that increasing quality infrastructure investment is critical to support faster and sustainable economic growth and development, we note the progress made in the development of a framework for effective planning and preparation practices, a report on scaling up blended finance de-risking measures, and a toolkit on advancing cross-border infrastructure projects. We also endorse the Practice Guide on Leveraging Project-Level Data and Digitising the Pipeline, and a Note on Improving the Accessibility and Availability of Key Market Data, which are voluntary and non-binding.

    Financial Sector Issues and Financial Inclusion

    We reaffirm our commitment to addressing vulnerabilities and promoting an open, resilient, and stable financial system, which supports economic growth, and is based on the consistent, full and timely implementation of all agreed upon reforms and international standards, including Basel III. We note the growing role of NBFIs in both EMDEs and AEs, and support the Financial Stability Board’s (FSB) work to address NBFI data availability and reporting, quality, use, and information sharing. We endorse the recently finalised FSB recommendations for addressing systemic risks from NBFI leverage and encourage implementation by jurisdictions. We welcome the appointment of the new FSB Chair, Andrew Bailey, Governor of the Bank of England.

    We reaffirm our commitment to the effective implementation of the G20 Roadmap for Enhancing Cross-border Payments (the Roadmap) as well as appropriate further actions as necessary to deliver on the Roadmap’s goals.  We welcome the initiatives undertaken by the FSB, the Bank for International Settlements’ (BIS) Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures, the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), and other international organisations to advance progress in its implementation. We welcome the launch of the BIS Innovation Hub-G20 TechSprint 2025, which aims to promote innovative solutions that improve trust and integrity in open and scalable finance. We note the update on the FSB Roadmap for addressing climate-related financial risks and the upcoming FSB thematic peer review on the implementation of the high-level crypto assets and stablecoin recommendations.

    We reaffirm our commitment to support the FATF and FATF-Style Regional Bodies in overseeing the implementation of the FATF Standards to combat money laundering, terrorist financing and proliferation financing across the Global Network. In particular, we reiterate the importance of stepping up global efforts to combat the misuse of legal entities, to foster increased asset recovery, to enhance payments transparency, and to promote innovation in the virtual assets sector, while mitigating illicit finance involving virtual assets. We also support FATFs ongoing work on emerging technologies and associated risks including from DeFi arrangements, stablecoins, and peer-to-peer transactions.

    We reaffirm our commitment to financial inclusion and to promoting access to financial services for individuals and micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs). We welcome insights from the Presidency’s Priority Paper on “Moving from Access to Usage,” which offers innovative approaches to enhance the use of financial services across payments, savings, credit, insurance, and remittances. We support the ongoing implementation of the G20 Global Partnership for Financial Inclusion Action Plan for MSME Financing. We also welcome the deliverable to explore the role of new and innovative technologies in enhancing the quality of financial inclusion for individuals and MSMEs.

    International Taxation

    We will continue engaging constructively to address concerns regarding Pillar Two global minimum taxes, with the shared goal of finding a balanced and practical solution that is acceptable for all. Delivery of a solution will  need to include a commitment to ensure any substantial risks that may be identified with respect to the level playing field, including a discussion of the fair treatment of substance-based tax incentives, and risks of base erosion and profit shifting, are addressed and will facilitate further progress to stabilise the international tax system, including a constructive dialogue on the tax challenges arising from the digitalisation of the economy. These efforts will be advanced in close cooperation across the membership of the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework (IF), preserving the tax sovereignty of all countries. We look forward to the OECD and Global Forum stock take report on tax transparency; the IF stock take report on BEPS; the OECD report on the exchange of real estate information on a voluntary basis to combat tax evasion and avoidance; the Platform for Collaboration on Tax (PCT) report on the progress in strengthening capacity-building frameworks to enhance technical assistance; and the IMF report on strengthening revenue administrations to improve domestic revenue mobilisation (DRM). We welcome the announcement of the PCT to hold the Tax and Development Conference, with a focus on DRM, in Tokyo next year.

    Recalling the G20 Rio de Janeiro Ministerial declaration on International Tax Cooperation, we welcome the IF’s decision to adopt a phased, evidence-based approach to explore global mobility and understand the interaction between tax policy, inequality and growth. We also welcome discussions to enhance the effectiveness and inclusivity of the IF. We note the ongoing negotiations to establish a United Nations Framework Convention on International Tax Cooperation and the participating G20 members reaffirm the objectives to reach broad consensus and build on existing achievements, processes and on the ongoing work of other international organisations, while seeking to avoid unnecessary duplication of efforts.

    Joint Finance Health Task Force

    The Joint Finance-Health Task Force (JFHTF) remains committed to strengthened finance and health co-ordination in relation to pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response (PPR). We emphasise the importance of efficient and effective health spending and domestic resource mobilisation, given the current reductions in donor assistance, as well as the need for better coordination and alignment of external and domestic funding flows. We note the preliminary insights of the updated versions of the Global Report on the Framework for Economic Vulnerabilities and Risks (FEVR) and of the Operational Playbook for response financing. We also note the Simulation exercises on pandemic response financing undertaken by finance and health officials and look forward to further exercises. We note the independent Joint Finance Health Task Force stocktake report, note the focused reconvening of the High-Level Independent Panel, and will continue to work with the Pandemic Fund and other global health funds that catalyse international and domestic investment actions to strengthen pandemic prevention, preparedness and responses.

    We note the outcome of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development, held from June 30 to July 3, 2025, in Seville, Spain, and the renewed commitment by participating countries to support developing countries in achieving their development objectives.

    We acknowledge the upcoming COP30 in Belém and note participating countries’ engagement within the COP30 Circle of Finance Ministers.

    We concluded our first cycle of G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors meetings on the vibrant continent of Africa, joining the people of South Africa in celebrating Nelson Mandela Day. Our discussions over the past two days centred on creating a better world, embodying the spirit of Mandela’s values. We look forward to our next meeting in October 2025 in Washington, D.C.

    MIL OSI Canada News

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: ICJ ruling leaves UK with duty to speed up green transition

    Source: Green Party of England and Wales

    Reacting to the International Criminal Court’s first-ever ruling on climate change, co-leader of the Green Party, Carla Denyer MP, said:

    “In a landmark ruling today the ICJ has made clear that failure to take decisive action to protect the climate, through continued fossil fuel production and consumption and granting fossil fuel exploration licences, can be considered as acting ‘wrongfully’. This means the UK has a legal duty to speed up the transition towards a cleaner, greener economy and block any new licences for the extraction of fossil fuels. 

    “The ruling also made clear that human rights must be at the heart of climate action because climate breakdown affects our rights to health, homes, and livelihoods.

    “The court has recognised that rich countries like the UK, responsible for ongoing and historic pollution, have a special responsibility to act, and to offer compensation to countries and communities already suffering from floods, droughts, and rising sea levels.

    “Today’s ruling should be the moment we draw a line. Governments that fail to act and polluters that refuse to clean up their act must no longer be allowed to harm communities either at home or across the globe with impunity.”

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Best wishes to Pagent Queen Anouska

    Source: Northern Ireland City of Armagh

    The Lord Mayor of Armagh City, Banbridge and Craigavon, Alderman Stephen Moutray was pleased to wish local lady Anouska Black all the very best as she headed to Florida USA to take part in the International United Ms.  competition.

    The Lord Mayor wished her well as she faced a grueling week long competition of interviews and catwalk shows and and whilst she did not bring the crown back to NorthernIreland we are all very proud of her successes.

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI Australia: From Epping to Powrunna – fourth translocation successful

    Source: Tasmania Police

    Issued: 23 Jul 2025

    Open larger image

    Eleven wombats were taken from Epping Forest National Park (Scientific) to Powrunna State Forest.

    An additional 11 northern hairy-nosed wombats have been transported from Epping Forest National Park (Scientific) in Queensland’s central west to Powrunna State Forest in the state’s southwest.

    This translocation project is an integral component of the Queensland Government’s northern hairy-nosed wombat recovery program which aims to establish a third population of the endangered marsupial.

    The project began in May 2024 after extensive preparation of the site at Powrunna and 37 wombats have already successfully been translocated.

    In June 2025, rangers from across Queensland gathered at Epping Forest National Park (Scientific) to carefully trap six females and five males for relocation to their new home.

    Principal Conservation Officer Samantha Ryan said there were now 21 females and 16 males at Powrunna, which had been specifically chosen for the third population of wombats.

    “Monitoring by the Department of the Environment, Tourism, Science and Innovation shows the wombats have embraced their new home with plenty of new burrows,” Ms Ryan said.

    “We have already seen some young-at-foot on trail cameras, and our ultimate goal is to create another self-sustaining population of northern hairy-nosed wombats.

    “Transportation takes around ten hours during the day when the wombats are usually sleeping, and they’re released early in the evening into artificial burrows.

    “Our goal is to translocate up to sixty wombats to Powrunna by 2026, and there is much hope that the population there will grow as it has at Epping.”

    Senior Program Officer David Field had never seen a northern hairy-nosed wombat prior to the translocation, and said it was wonderful to be involved.

    “It was great to be involved in the planning, trapping, relocation and release of this endangered species and it’s an experience I’ll never forget,” Mr Field said.

    “I’ve learnt so much by working alongside experts, and the wombats were in excellent condition and were bigger and softer than you’d expect.”

    Rangers from the Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service have used radio trackers and remote cameras to monitor wombats at Powrunna, and site inspections show they have moved on from starter burrows and have dug multiple burrows of their own.

    Northern hairy-nosed wombats previously ranged from New South Wales and into Queensland. In the eighties, the population of wombats at Epping Forest National Park was estimated to be around 35 and is now estimated to be at least 400.

    Richard Underwood Nature Refuge near Wycombe is managed by the Australian Wildlife Conservancy and is home to a small population of northern hairy-nosed wombats.

    The Gunggari Native Title Aboriginal Corporation (GNTAC) and Gunggari Native Title Holders, Glencore, The Wombat Foundation and Australian Wildlife Conservancy have provided ongoing support for this project.

    In Queensland, some national parks are designated as “scientific” and are either fully or partially closed to the public to protect their natural values.

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI Africa: The ‘Oil Industry, African Energy Chamber (AEC) and Africa Bromance’ Remains Committed to Africa’s Energy Development Despite Attacks from Foreign Funded Groups

    Source: APO

    In yet another attack on the African oil and gas industry, Extinction Rebellion has condemned South Africa as it strives to advance oil and gas exploration across its offshore market. An article published this week by the group’s spokesperson Moraig Peden cites new offshore oil and gas projects as being in direct conflict with the country’s climate commitments, despite the fact that operators have secured environmental authorization to explore offshore. Representing the voice of the African energy sector, the African Energy Chamber (AEC) (https://EnergyChamber.org) condemns the article as yet another blatant attack on not only the African energy industry but its population at large. Oil and gas will play a fundamental role in alleviating energy poverty in Africa and the AEC – in collaboration with the oil industry and African communities – will continue advocating for offshore exploration and production.   

    Groups such as Extinction Rebellion has been consistent in their attacks against the industry, turning to violent and disruptive measures to voice their biases and relentless opposition. Rather than peaceful protests, foreign funded environmental groups have turned to climate-motivated sabotage. Activists from Shut the System, for example, sabotaged internet cables in London in early 2025. Following which, the group stated that they “vow to wage a campaign of sabotage targeting the tools, property and machinery of those most responsible for global warming.” This is a direct attack on the industry.  

    Another group, Just Stop Oil, has also been relentless. Attacks include throwing soup at Van Gogh’s Sunflowers painting, throwing paint on Stonehenge, gluing themselves to roads to stop traffic, cable-tying themselves to goal posts at sports events and England-wide blockades at ten critical oil facilities in 2022. Just Stop Oil protestors were also given multi-year prison sentences in England in 2024 for their roles in closing multiple junctions of the M25 motorway. In the US, Greenpeace was issued to pay $660 million in damages in 2025 for malicious interference with the Dakota Access Pipeline. The group also has a history of occupying coal power plants and blocking coal shipments in New Zealand, Australia and the UK. But it is the group’s attacks on the industry in Africa that stand to bring far-reaching disruptions.   

    Greenpeace has been strongly opposing exploration in Africa by companies such as Shell, Meren Energy (formerly Africa Oil Corp), TotalEnergies and more. All three companies have secured environmental authorization and/or financing for their offshore activities but Greenpeace continues to launch attacks against these companies. The company challenged Shell’s exploration rights in court and continues to ask for donations to support its attacks on oil companies.  

    “We at the chamber expected these attacks as we approach this next edition of AEW: Invest in African Energies. These attacks always come. We denounce the violence of Extinction rebellion.  We hope that we will have a robust conversation about Africans right to drill and provide energy for the millions of Africans that live without access to electricity or clean cooking solutions. The AEC-Africa-Oil and Gas Industry bromance will continue fighting for Africa. We will continue fighting to make energy poverty history. We will continue fighting for generations to come,” states NJ Ayuk, Executive Chairman of the AEC.  

    It is clear that the writer Peden does not fully understand the African context. If the writer truly understood what every day Africans in Mali, Mozambique, Namibia and other countries go through, she would not have this extremist and radical environmental agenda against the continent’s energy development. We must be reminded that over 600 million Africans live without access to electricity while over 900 million people live without access to clean cooking solutions. But it seems that Extinction Rebellion is bent on ensuring that Africans remain without access to electricity or the energy they need for the future. This is exactly what the AEC opposes. This is also why we are proud to be part of a bromance with Africa and the global oil and gas industry. This is why we will continue fighting for oil and gas exploration.  

    It is surprising to see that Extinction Rebellion and Peden criticize African exploration efforts when they fail to criticize the bromance between countries in other parts of the world and the oil and gas industry. They do not criticize Norway for producing four million bpd and sanctioning new energy projects or the UK which is drilling in the North Sea or the US in the Gulf. It is Africa, where people want to drill for more oil and gas to help lift the continent out of poverty, that the attacks come. 

    “I was hoping the she would bring Greta Thunberg along because she will protest anything. Moraig Peden and the foreign funded green groups now have the Mantashe Derangement Syndrome.  The attacks on Africans by Moraig Peden and Extinction rebellion deceitful and dishonest, Or blatantly dishonest. This is just the beginning, Africans and the energy industry have been through tough times, but you’ve never seen me quit and there’s no quitting on our fight to make energy poverty history and industrialize Africa. We see Moraig Peden’s attacks as simply hypocrisy especially coming from a wealthy woman with a Eurocentric view of energy who believes Africans should stay in the dark while she is shopping for car elevators” Concluded Ayuk. 

    Distributed by APO Group on behalf of African Energy Chamber.

    Media files

    .

    MIL OSI Africa

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Celebrating Portadown Ladies Hockey Club Successes

    Source: Northern Ireland City of Armagh

    Portadown Ladies Hockey Club players
    Lord Mayor, Alderman Stephen Moutray, along along with former Deputy Lord Mayor, Cllr Kyle Savage who proposed the reception and Cllr Kyle Moutray – recently hosted a Civic Reception for the Members of Portadown Ladies Hockey Club after a historic season for the club, the highlight being the 1st XI Team being promoted to play in the EY Hockey Ireland Division 1 next season – the first time in the club’s history.

    The 2XI won their league and gained promotion, the 3XI were also promoted and 4XI did the double by winning their cup and gaining promotion by winning their league.   Also the newly formed 5XI reaching the final of the Minor Cup. The Club is going from strength to strength with a 6XI team planning to be formed next season.

    The Lord Mayor also congratulated the players of the club who have gained representative honours, also playing for Ulster and Ireland and wished them well as they head to Holland and Glasgow in a few weeks to play for Ireland.

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Lurgan’s Warm Welcome to German Team

    Source: Northern Ireland City of Armagh

    Lord Mayor, Alderman Stephen Moutray and Councillor Peter Haire welcomed Officials from Glenavon Football Club and Officials from German team FC Erzgebirge Aue, to Craigavon Civic and Conference Centre ahead of their historic friendly at Mourneview Park, Lurgan on Saturday 5 July 2025. Also pictured is Upper Bann MP Carla Lockhart.

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Congratulations to the Girls of Lurgan Town FC

    Source: Northern Ireland City of Armagh

    Lord Mayor, Alderman Stephen Moutray, along with Alderman Mark Baxter and Councillor Peter Haire, hosted a Civic Reception for Lurgan Town FC U13 and U15 girls’ teams.

    The U13 girls to celebrate their 2025 Blackpool International Cup win and for the U15 Girls team who won the Mid Ulster Youth League Championship.

     

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Innovative projects given go ahead by MMO

    Source: United Kingdom – Government Statements

    News story

    Innovative projects given go ahead by MMO

    The Marine Management Organisation (MMO) Marine Licensing team grants marine licences to protect and enhance England’s marine environment.

    New Habitat Structure in Teesside

    The Tees Rivers Charitable Trust applied to MMO to install up to 18 dock wall fittings (vertipools) and up to three modular floating islands within Middlehaven Dock, near Middlesbrough, to increase biodiversity and available habitat for wildlife.

    Each vertipool can store up to 1.5 litres of intertidal seawater, which increases the habitat for invertebrates. Up to three modular floating habitat islands will be installed consisting of up to 20 modules, made with a coconut fibre matting. They will be planted with up to 30 different freshwater and up to 13 different halophyte species, all of which are native to the UK.

    The roots of the plants form valuable habitats and refuge for aquatic organisms such as juvenile fish, while also filtering the water. The platforms also provide roosting and feeding areas for birds.

    As part of the application process, the marine licensing team carried out a Habitat Regulations Assessment (HRA) and consulted with relevant organisations.

    Once completed, the project should increase local biodiversity and bring public amenity benefits by inspiring young ecologists and reconnecting the public with nature.

    Floating Offshore Wind Demonstration Project

    Wave Hub Limited applied to vary their existing marine licence in relation to the Twin Hub Floating Offshore Wind Demonstration Project. The variation would change their marine licence to allow 40mw of power rather than 32mw, and extend it for five years to January 2037 to allow adequate time for works to be completed following additional funding contracts.

    The requested variation will also extend the operational period, because while floating offshore wind technology is relatively new, the design life of fixed bottom offshore wind farms often exceeds 30 years, the aim for floating wind technology is to achieve a similar, if not greater longevity.

    The marine licensing team worked closely with both the applicant and advisors during and after the consultation, answering any follow up questions to ensure the application was processed as quickly as possible.

    The changes to the marine licence will allow the project greater flexibility and improve the longevity of the floating wind farm.

    Woodside Ferry Terminal Upgrade

    Mersey Travel Limited applied for a marine licence to replace the Woodside ferry terminal in Merseyside.

    The ferry service at Woodside, on the edge of The Wirral, dates back to the 13th century and a new ferry terminal was built during the 19th century. The aim of the development is to allow the Woodside ferry landing to operate for the next 25 years.

    The works involve removing the linking bridge and installing new foundations called monopiles, which will support a replacement landing area.

    The marine licensing team liaised closely with the applicant and consultees throughout the application process. The team also undertook a Habitats Regulations Assessment (HRA) and included conditions on the marine licence to minimise impacts to the environment, including a working in cold weather ban to reduce impacts to birds during sensitive times.

    Once complete, the new ferry terminal should vastly improve access for residents and tourists in the area.

    Greatham Marsh Restoration

    The Greatham Marsh Restoration project is centred on the restoration of intertidal habitat on low-lying land near Greatham Village in Teesside. The objective of the project is to restore Greatham Marsh and to enable the natural migration of intertidal habitats as sea levels rise. BAM Nuttall contractors made a marine licence application to remove the tidal barrier, which is maintained by the Environment Agency, in order to connect the watercourse to the floodplain.

    The work is part of a wider programme called Tees Tidelands, which will open the tributaries to tidal influence, enable fish passage and re-establish parts of the natural estuary.

    The licence associated with the existing flood defence structure commenced in 1980 and will expire in 2029. One of the conditions of the original licence stipulates that when the licence expires, the works shall be removed, and the riverbanks and foreshore reinstated.

    The removal of this structure would allow tidal flow to propagate upstream to flood the agricultural land and would allow the formation of both lower and upper intertidal marsh.

    The marine licensing team provided ongoing support to the applicant, allowing them time to provide further information and respond to application updates.

    Updates to this page

    Published 23 July 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Portadown People’s Park to host free Family Fun Day

    Source: Northern Ireland City of Armagh

    Portadown People’s Park are excited to welcome families for a fantastic day of fun and celebration. Join us for a free family fun day packed with activities for children and families to enjoy, taking place on Saturday 9th August 2025. Attendees will also have the opportunity to connect with local support organisations in a relaxed and enjoyable setting.

    The event is all about bringing people together to interact, fostering a sense of belonging and shared identity. It’s a great chance to build new friendships and enjoy a fun and welcoming environment that encourages families to spend time together and take part in community activities.

    Looking forward to the event, Lord Mayor of Armagh City, Banbridge and Craigavon Borough Alderman Stephen Moutray commented:

    “I am delighted to welcome you all to our upcoming family fun day, a fantastic day to enjoy a vibrant programme of free activities. It’s a great way for everyone to come together and celebrate the community spirit that makes our borough so special.”

    Event Details:

    Location: Portadown People’s Park

    Date: Saturday 9th August 2025

    Time: 12:00pm – 4:00pm

    Free admission

    This initiative is supported through The Executive Office District Council Good Relations Programme.

    MIL OSI United Kingdom