Category: Intelligence Agencies

  • MIL-OSI Security: Former Employee Admits Embezzling At Least $300,000 from St. Louis County Company

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    ST. LOUIS – A man from Charlotte, North Carolina has admitted embezzling at least $300,000 from a St. Louis County company, U.S. Attorney Sayler A. Fleming announced Monday.

    Scott H. Foster, 48, pleaded guilty Friday to one count of wire fraud. He admitted as part of his plea that he committed the crime from January 2018 to December 2022, while employed as a mid-level executive of the company. Foster manipulated the human resources systems to create an employee account for his paramour, triggering wages and benefits totaling more than $273,000.00 to be paid to his paramour over nearly five years, despite this individual performing little or no actual work for the company. Foster also used a corporate American Express card to pay for more than $33,000 in personal travel for himself, his paramour and other friends and acquaintances.

    Foster is scheduled to be sentenced May 22.

    The FBI investigated the case. Assistant U.S. Attorney Jonathan Clow prosecuted the case. 

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: Three Men Sentenced to Prison for Carjackings and Armed Robberies in Chicago

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    CHICAGO — Three men who committed multiple carjackings and robberies in Chicago, including carjacking a vehicle with an infant in the back seat and pistol-whipping a convenience store clerk, have been sentenced to federal prison terms ranging from 15 to 22 years.

    DAMANDRE HENLEY, DWIGHT HASBERRY, TYLER OATES-NELSON, and DAVARIO MCDOWELL engaged in a series of carjackings and robberies in Chicago in the overnight hours of Sept. 28 and 29, 2022.  The four defendants pleaded guilty last year to federal carjacking, armed robbery, and firearm charges. 

    On Thursday, U.S. District Judge Manish Shah sentenced Oates-Nelson, 29, of Chicago, to 15 years in federal prison. On Wednesday, Judge Shah sentenced McDowell, 25, of Chicago, to 18 years.  On Feb. 11, 2025, Judge Shah sentenced Henley, 28, of Chicago, to 22 years. Hasberry, 31, of Chicago, is scheduled to be sentenced by Judge Shah on March 20, 2025, at 1:30 p.m.

    Four of the carjackings occurred in the early morning hours of Sept. 28, 2022.  The carjacking involving the infant occurred late that evening, when the four men carjacked a Volkswagen Tiguan in Chicago’s West Town neighborhood. After the men drove to the neighborhood in Oates-Nelson’s vehicle, Henley, Hansberry, and McDowell pointed guns at the driver and the infant in a rear car seat and ordered them out of the vehicle.  One of the carjackers patted down the driver and removed a registered handgun from his pocket.  The driver removed the infant from the car before Henley, Hansberry, and McDowell got into the Tiguan and drove away.

    A short time later, the four men, now all traveling in the stolen Tiguan, drove to Chicago’s Ravenswood Manor neighborhood, where Henley, McDowell, and Hansberry robbed one victim at gunpoint of their cell phone, wallet, and keys, and another victim of their backpack.

    The four men then robbed a nearby 7-Eleven convenience store.  With Oates-Nelson waiting in the stolen Tiguan, Henley, McDowell, and Hansberry entered the store carrying guns.  Henley used his gun to strike a store clerk in the head while forcing him to open the cash register.  The defendants fled the store with cash, cigarettes, and liquor bottles.

    The sentences were announced by Morris Pasqual, Acting United States Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois, Douglas S. DePodesta, Special Agent-in-Charge of the Chicago Field Office of the FBI, and Larry Snelling, Superintendent of the Chicago Police Department. The government is represented by Assistant U.S. Attorney Elie Zenner.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: Charlotte Sex Trafficker And Co-Conspirator Are Sentenced To Prison

    Source: United States Department of Justice (Human Trafficking)

    CHARLOTTE, N.C. –  A Charlotte man and his co-conspirator were sentenced to prison today for sex trafficking a minor, announced Lawrence J. Cameron, Acting U.S. Attorney for the Western District of North Carolina.

    Robert M. DeWitt, Special Agent in Charge of the FBI in North Carolina joins Acting U.S. Attorney Cameron in making today’s announcement.

    Tawaan Batten, 34, also known as “Slicc,” was sentenced to 34 years in prison followed by 30 years of supervised release. In December 2023, Batten was convicted at trial of conspiracy to commit sex trafficking of a minor, sex trafficking of a minor, and transportation of a minor with the intent to engage in commercial sexual activity. Batten’s co-conspirator, Kristi Heather King, 34, of Locust, N.C., was sentenced to 42 months in prison and a period of supervised release, after pleading guilty to conspiracy to commit sex trafficking of a minor.

    “Batten and his then-girlfriend preyed on a vulnerable child and repeatedly subjected her to physical and psychological harm for their profit,” said Acting U.S. Attorney Cameron. “Today’s sentence sends a clear message: federal prosecutors and law enforcement are committed to ensuring that sex traffickers will face the full force of justice.”

    “It is difficult to fathom that someone would sell a child for sex. But that is exactly what Batten and King did and now both of them will do federal prison for their crimes,” said Special Agent in Charge DeWitt. “The FBI works tirelessly to hold accountable those who carry out crimes against children, and we devote significant resources to help sex trafficking victims recover from the trauma they suffer.”

    According to evidence presented at Batten’s trial, witness testimony, and court documents, from July 2021 to December 2021, Batten, at times assisted by King, sex trafficked a 15-year-old minor victim. Batten met the minor victim, who had run away from her home, in a hotel parking lot in Charlotte. Batten then introduced the minor victim to King, who was Batten’s girlfriend at the time. The minor victim began engaging in commercial sex transactions shortly after meeting Batten.

    Trial evidence showed that Batten, at times assisted by King, created and posted advertisements of the minor victim on commercial sex websites and arranged for the minor victim to engage in sexual encounters with customers, usually multiple times a day. Most of these encounters took place in hotel rooms booked by Batten in North Carolina and South Carolina. Other times, Batten and King drove the minor victim to a customer’s location to engage in commercial sex. Batten kept the money the victim earned from these commercial sexual encounters and continued to have the victim work even when she was not feeling well.

    According to testimony and evidence at Batten’s trial, Batten gave the minor victim drugs. Batten also controlled the minor victim through intimidation and manipulation, including branding the minor victim with tattoos. Batten also physically assaulted King multiple times.

    Batten remains in federal custody pending placement to a Federal Bureau of Prisons facility.

    In making today’s announcement, Acting U.S. Attorney Cameron commended the FBI for leading this investigation and thanked the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department for their invaluable assistance.

    Assistant U.S. Attorneys Stephanie Spaugh and Daniel Cervantes of the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Charlotte prosecuted the case.

    If you are the victim of human trafficking or may have information about a potential trafficking situation, please call the FBI, local law enforcement, or the National Human Trafficking Resource Center (NHTRC) at 1-888-373-7888.  NHTRC is a national, toll-free hotline, with specialists available to answer calls from anywhere in the country, 24 hours a day, seven days a week, every day of the year related to potential trafficking victims, suspicious behaviors, and/or locations where trafficking is suspected to occur. To submit a tip to the NHTRC online please visit https://humantraffickinghotline.org/report-trafficking.

     

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI: POPcodes Wins ETA’s Most Innovative Solution for 2025

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    LAS VEGAS, Feb. 24, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — POPcodes, Inc. (POPcodes), a leading provider of value-added, B2B and B2C solutions for payment providers, is honored to receive the Most Innovative Product or Solution Award from the Electronic Transactions Association (ETA). POPcodes will receive the award during the Visa Celebration & ETA Star Awards on April 2, 2025, at TRANSACT, the premier annual event for the payments industry.

    The Most Innovative Product or Solution Award recognizes companies that deliver exceptional increases in usability, reduced friction, increased profitability, or drive advancements for the payments ecosystem. POPcodes’ Direct-to-MerchantTM (D2M) Communication Platform embodies all those criteria, transforming how payment solution providers (PSPs) and their enterprise and SMB merchant customers connect, communicate, and engage.

    D2M accelerates activations, reduces training and support costs, and drives increased adoption of value-added service by enabling instant, campaign-based, and self-serve messaging with graphical, omnichannel workflows delivered in the merchants’ preferred language directly to the in-person point of purchase.

    POPcodes’ unique cloud/app-based hybrid platform gives PSPs unprecedented simplicity, flexibility, control, and effectiveness when meeting their B2B communication and process automation needs — delivering a better merchant experience while meeting the payment ecosystem’s rigorous security and stability demands.

    POPcodes’ clients include two of the top five global payment processors. These processors use D2M to solve multiple business-critical challenges, including delivering a better first experience for new merchants, accelerating new device and application rollouts, reducing training support and costs, and guiding merchants through PCI and AML/KYC compliance. Most importantly, POPcodes drive merchant referrals and increase value-added service sales. By leveraging the D2M platform’s features and POPcodes’ expertise, the solution has proven value to the PSP’s portfolio growth, profitability, and retention goals.

    CEO Gregg Aamoth explained, “We’re dedicated to revolutionizing the payments industry by helping PSPs around the world deliver seamless, secure, and user-friendly workflows that empower merchants and enhance their experience, while optimizing PSPs’ business, partnerships, and shareholder value.”

    “This recognition is an honor and testament to our team’s hard work. We look forward to expanding our mission of innovation and excellence around the globe, ultimately connecting all players in the multi-trillion dollar retail and payments value chains,” Aamoth said.

    The award is the latest for POPcodes’ D2M platform. The company was runner-up in the ETA’s Most Innovation Solution category in 2024 and also received awards and recognitions at Money 20/20 and the SouthEast, NorthEast, and Western States Acquirers Association conferences.

    POPcodes congratulates all nominees and winners in this year’s ETA Awards for their accomplishments and dedication to advancing payment innovation.

    About POPcodes

    POPcodes’ cloud-based platform, white-labeled apps, and AI-enabled content, workflow, and campaign management services transform the rapidly expanding network of smart, in-person payment devices into an exclusive, owned digital media channel with secure, bi-directional messaging and omnichannel workflows that help globally recognized brands meet their B2B, B2B2B, B2C, and B2B2C obligations and goals.

    Learn more at popcodes.com

    Contact
    Kristi Hamilton
    (904) 718-8972
    Kristi@Skyrocketgroup.com

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Security: Defense News: Mission And Purpose On Full Display As Truman Returns To Sea

    Source: United States Navy

    “Our ship remains operationally ready to complete deployment with mission and purpose on full display by the entire crew,” said Capt. Chris Hill, commanding officer of Harry S. Truman. “We are out here launching and recovering aircraft, ready to ‘Give ‘em Hell’ with combat credible power.”

    The U.S. Navy’s ability to rapidly repair its warships anywhere in the world is a testament to our lethality and the warfighting advantage of relationships with Allies and partners.

    Led by Forward Deployed Regional Maintenance Center (FDRMC), Truman completed the five-day ERAV at Naval Support Activity (NSA) Souda Bay, Greece. In an all-hands effort, Sailors worked with FDRMC personnel, Norfolk Naval Shipyard, and local industry partner Theodoropoulos Group to assess damage, develop a repair plan, and restore weathertight integrity to the ship following the collision on Feb. 12.

    “FDRMC is focused on keeping our forward-deployed naval forces mission-ready across 5th and 6th Fleets, maintaining critical combat readiness for the ships and their Sailors,” said Capt. Mollie Bily, FDRMC commanding officer. “The rapid repair effort on Truman was a testament to our expeditionary maintenance expertise and the exceptional collaboration with our Norfolk Naval Shipyard teammates and industry partners.”

    Since deploying, Carrier Air Wing (CVW) 1 has flown over 5,500 sorties, including two self-defense strikes into Houthi-controlled Yemen territory and a large force strike against ISIS-Somalia targets in Northeast Somalia in coordination with U.S. Africa Command. The Harry S. Truman Carrier Strike Group continues to provide maritime security and regional stability in support of its component commanders.

    The carrier strike group includes the flagship USS Harry S. Truman (CVN 75); Carrier Air Wing (CVW) 1, with eight embarked aviation squadrons; staffs from CSG-8, CVW-1, and Destroyer Squadron (DESRON) 28; the Ticonderoga-class guided-missile cruiser USS Gettysburg (CG 64); and three Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyers, USS Stout (DDG 55), USS The Sullivans (DDG 68), and USS Jason Dunham (DDG 109).

    HSTCSG’s mission is to conduct prompt and sustained combat operations at sea and maintain a forward presence through sea control and power projection capabilities. For more information, visit DVIDS at https://www.dvidshub.net/unit/CVN75.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI USA: Barrio Azteca Gang Leader and Member Extradited from Mexico to the United States to Face Charges Related to 2010 U.S. Consulate Murders in Juarez

    Source: US State of North Dakota

    Two alleged members of the Barrio Azteca (BA), a transnational criminal organization allied with the Juarez Cartel, were extradited from Mexico to the United States to face charges related to the March 2010 murders of U.S. Consulate employees in Juarez, Mexico. Eduardo Ravelo, also known as Tablas, Tablero, and T-Blas, and Enrique Guajardo Lopez, also known as Kiki, arrived in the United States on Feb. 20 and made their initial appearances today in the Western District of Texas. Ravelo, a former FBI Top 10 Most Wanted Fugitive, and Guajardo were charged in a 12-count third superseding indictment unsealed in March 2011.

    “The defendants allegedly participated in the murder of three U.S. Consulate employees in Mexico in March 2010, along with many other acts of senseless violence,” said Supervisory Official Antoinette T. Bacon of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division. “No U.S. citizen, on either side of our border with Mexico, should have to live in fear of Barrio Azteca, any other violent border gang, or any drug cartel. The defendants’ extradition to the United States is an example of the Department’s unwavering commitment to eliminating transnational criminal organizations and the pursuit of justice for the victims of those tragic murders in Juarez, Mexico.”

    “The extradition and U.S. custody of these two defendants, who are both alleged to be members of Barrio Azteca operating along the border, is essential to our mission of disrupting and dismantling these dangerous criminal organizations,” said Acting U.S. Attorney Margaret Leachman for the Western District of Texas. “With the help of our federal, state and local law enforcement partners, this U.S. Attorney’s Office will aggressively prosecute Ravelo and Guajardo throughout this case for their alleged participation in the 2010 Consulate murders and other gang related activity.”

    “These extraditions demonstrate the FBI’s commitment to holding violent criminals accountable, no matter where they flee,” said Assistant Director Chad Yarbrough of the FBI’s Criminal Investigative Division. “The FBI and our partners will continue to aggressively pursue the Barrio Azteca and other transnational gangs wherever they operate and seek justice for the victims affected by their violent actions.”

    “The extradition of these two members of the Barrio Azteca transnational criminal organization brings us another step closer to justice for the victims of the 2010 U.S. Consulate murders in Juarez,” said Acting Administrator Derek S. Maltz of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA). “DEA never forgets and we never give up. Our commitment to pursue the members of violent criminal organizations threatening American lives is as strong as ever, and our message is clear — DEA will use every resource we have to get justice for American lives lost as a result of these violent networks.”

    A total of 35 BA members and associates based in the United States and Mexico were charged in the third superseding indictment for allegedly committing various criminal acts, including racketeering, narcotics distribution and importation, retaliation against persons providing information to U.S. law enforcement, extortion, money laundering, obstruction of justice, and murder. Of the 35 defendants, 10 Mexican nationals, including Ravelo and Guajardo, were charged with the March 13, 2010, murders in Juarez of U.S. Consulate employee Leslie Ann Enriquez Catton; her husband, Arthur Redelfs; and Jorge Alberto Salcido Ceniceros, the husband of another U.S. Consulate employee. All the defendants have been apprehended, and 28 have pleaded guilty. Three defendants have been convicted at trial, one committed suicide before the conclusion of his trial, and one is awaiting extradition from Mexico.

    According to court documents and evidence presented at co-defendant trials, the BA is a violent street and prison gang that began in the late 1980s and expanded into a transnational criminal organization. In the 2000s, the BA formed an alliance in Mexico with “La Linea,” which is part of the Juarez Drug Cartel (also known as the Vincente Carrillo Fuentes Drug Cartel or VCF). The purpose of the BA-La Linea alliance was to battle the Chapo Guzman Cartel and its allies for control of the drug trafficking routes through Juarez and Chihuahua. The drug routes through Juarez, known as the Juarez Plaza, are important to drug trafficking organizations because they are a principal illicit drug trafficking conduit into the United States.

    The gang has a militaristic command structure and includes captains, lieutenants, sergeants, and soldiers — all with the purpose of maintaining power and enriching its members and associates through drug trafficking, money laundering, extortion, intimidation, violence, threats of violence, and murder.

    According to court documents, Ravelo and Guajardo participated in BA activities, including narcotics trafficking and acts of violence by BA members, both in Mexico and the United States. If convicted, Ravelo and Guajardo each face a maximum penalty of life in prison. A federal district court judge will determine any sentence after considering the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors.

    Ravelo’s and Guajardo’s extraditions are the result of close coordination between U.S. law enforcement and the government of Mexico in the investigation and prosecution of this case. The cooperation and assistance of the government of Mexico was essential to achieving the successful extraditions.

    The FBI El Paso Field Office; FBI Albuquerque Field Office, Las Cruces Resident Agency; DEA Juarez Division; and DEA El Paso Division investigated the case. Special assistance was provided by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives; U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement; U.S. Marshals Service; U.S. Customs and Border Protection; Federal Bureau of Prisons; U.S. Diplomatic Security Service; Texas Department of Public Safety; Texas Department of Criminal Justice; El Paso Police Department; El Paso County Sheriff’s Office; El Paso Independent School District Police Department; Texas Alcohol and Beverage Commission; New Mexico State Police; Dona Ana County, New Mexico Sheriff’s Office; Las Cruces, New Mexico Police Department; Southern New Mexico Correctional Facility and Otero County Prison Facility New Mexico.

    Trial Attorney Jay Bauer of the Criminal Division’s Human Rights and Special Prosecutions Section, Trial Attorney Christina Taylor of the Criminal Division’s Violent Crime and Racketeering Section, and Assistant U.S. Attorney Steven Spitzer for the Western District of Texas are prosecuting the case.

    The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of New Mexico, the Justice Department’s Office of International Affairs, and the Criminal Division’s Office of Enforcement Operations provided significant assistance in this case.

    An indictment is merely an allegation. All defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Security: Barrio Azteca Gang Leader and Member Extradited from Mexico to the United States to Face Charges Related to 2010 U.S. Consulate Murders in Juarez

    Source: United States Attorneys General

    Two alleged members of the Barrio Azteca (BA), a transnational criminal organization allied with the Juarez Cartel, were extradited from Mexico to the United States to face charges related to the March 2010 murders of U.S. Consulate employees in Juarez, Mexico. Eduardo Ravelo, also known as Tablas, Tablero, and T-Blas, and Enrique Guajardo Lopez, also known as Kiki, arrived in the United States on Feb. 20 and made their initial appearances today in the Western District of Texas. Ravelo, a former FBI Top 10 Most Wanted Fugitive, and Guajardo were charged in a 12-count third superseding indictment unsealed in March 2011.

    “The defendants allegedly participated in the murder of three U.S. Consulate employees in Mexico in March 2010, along with many other acts of senseless violence,” said Supervisory Official Antoinette T. Bacon of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division. “No U.S. citizen, on either side of our border with Mexico, should have to live in fear of Barrio Azteca, any other violent border gang, or any drug cartel. The defendants’ extradition to the United States is an example of the Department’s unwavering commitment to eliminating transnational criminal organizations and the pursuit of justice for the victims of those tragic murders in Juarez, Mexico.”

    “The extradition and U.S. custody of these two defendants, who are both alleged to be members of Barrio Azteca operating along the border, is essential to our mission of disrupting and dismantling these dangerous criminal organizations,” said Acting U.S. Attorney Margaret Leachman for the Western District of Texas. “With the help of our federal, state and local law enforcement partners, this U.S. Attorney’s Office will aggressively prosecute Ravelo and Guajardo throughout this case for their alleged participation in the 2010 Consulate murders and other gang related activity.”

    “These extraditions demonstrate the FBI’s commitment to holding violent criminals accountable, no matter where they flee,” said Assistant Director Chad Yarbrough of the FBI’s Criminal Investigative Division. “The FBI and our partners will continue to aggressively pursue the Barrio Azteca and other transnational gangs wherever they operate and seek justice for the victims affected by their violent actions.”

    “The extradition of these two members of the Barrio Azteca transnational criminal organization brings us another step closer to justice for the victims of the 2010 U.S. Consulate murders in Juarez,” said Acting Administrator Derek S. Maltz of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA). “DEA never forgets and we never give up. Our commitment to pursue the members of violent criminal organizations threatening American lives is as strong as ever, and our message is clear — DEA will use every resource we have to get justice for American lives lost as a result of these violent networks.”

    A total of 35 BA members and associates based in the United States and Mexico were charged in the third superseding indictment for allegedly committing various criminal acts, including racketeering, narcotics distribution and importation, retaliation against persons providing information to U.S. law enforcement, extortion, money laundering, obstruction of justice, and murder. Of the 35 defendants, 10 Mexican nationals, including Ravelo and Guajardo, were charged with the March 13, 2010, murders in Juarez of U.S. Consulate employee Leslie Ann Enriquez Catton; her husband, Arthur Redelfs; and Jorge Alberto Salcido Ceniceros, the husband of another U.S. Consulate employee. All the defendants have been apprehended, and 28 have pleaded guilty. Three defendants have been convicted at trial, one committed suicide before the conclusion of his trial, and one is awaiting extradition from Mexico.

    According to court documents and evidence presented at co-defendant trials, the BA is a violent street and prison gang that began in the late 1980s and expanded into a transnational criminal organization. In the 2000s, the BA formed an alliance in Mexico with “La Linea,” which is part of the Juarez Drug Cartel (also known as the Vincente Carrillo Fuentes Drug Cartel or VCF). The purpose of the BA-La Linea alliance was to battle the Chapo Guzman Cartel and its allies for control of the drug trafficking routes through Juarez and Chihuahua. The drug routes through Juarez, known as the Juarez Plaza, are important to drug trafficking organizations because they are a principal illicit drug trafficking conduit into the United States.

    The gang has a militaristic command structure and includes captains, lieutenants, sergeants, and soldiers — all with the purpose of maintaining power and enriching its members and associates through drug trafficking, money laundering, extortion, intimidation, violence, threats of violence, and murder.

    According to court documents, Ravelo and Guajardo participated in BA activities, including narcotics trafficking and acts of violence by BA members, both in Mexico and the United States. If convicted, Ravelo and Guajardo each face a maximum penalty of life in prison. A federal district court judge will determine any sentence after considering the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors.

    Ravelo’s and Guajardo’s extraditions are the result of close coordination between U.S. law enforcement and the government of Mexico in the investigation and prosecution of this case. The cooperation and assistance of the government of Mexico was essential to achieving the successful extraditions.

    The FBI El Paso Field Office; FBI Albuquerque Field Office, Las Cruces Resident Agency; DEA Juarez Division; and DEA El Paso Division investigated the case. Special assistance was provided by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives; U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement; U.S. Marshals Service; U.S. Customs and Border Protection; Federal Bureau of Prisons; U.S. Diplomatic Security Service; Texas Department of Public Safety; Texas Department of Criminal Justice; El Paso Police Department; El Paso County Sheriff’s Office; El Paso Independent School District Police Department; Texas Alcohol and Beverage Commission; New Mexico State Police; Dona Ana County, New Mexico Sheriff’s Office; Las Cruces, New Mexico Police Department; Southern New Mexico Correctional Facility and Otero County Prison Facility New Mexico.

    Trial Attorney Jay Bauer of the Criminal Division’s Human Rights and Special Prosecutions Section, Trial Attorney Christina Taylor of the Criminal Division’s Violent Crime and Racketeering Section, and Assistant U.S. Attorney Steven Spitzer for the Western District of Texas are prosecuting the case.

    The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of New Mexico, the Justice Department’s Office of International Affairs, and the Criminal Division’s Office of Enforcement Operations provided significant assistance in this case.

    An indictment is merely an allegation. All defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI USA: Fourteen Members of Extensive Alien Smuggling Organization Charged and Eight Arrested for Smuggling Hundreds of Illegal Aliens into the United States

    Source: US State of California

    Note: View the indictment here.

    Fourteen alleged members of a prolific alien smuggling organization were charged for their roles smuggling aliens from South and Central America into the United States via the southern border.

    A grand jury in Las Cruces, New Mexico, returned an indictment on Feb. 19 against 14 individuals for conspiracy to transport, harbor, and bring in illegal aliens to the United States. Eight of those charged were arrested on Feb. 20 and 21.

    “Today’s indictment alleges that the defendants engaged in a sophisticated conspiracy to smuggle aliens into and throughout the United States at great danger to the aliens, resulting in the death of one person,” said Supervisory Official Antoinette T. Bacon of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division. “The Justice Department worked with our partners at the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to dismantle an alien smuggling organization based in Mexico that has allegedly smuggled hundreds of illegal aliens, including unaccompanied children, through New Mexico and South Texas. We are committed to eliminating transnational alien smuggling organizations that exploit migrants purely for profit and undermine our national security.”

    According to the indictment unsealed today, the defendants participated in a conspiracy to illegally bring undocumented aliens from Mexico into the United States via the U.S. southern border. The indictment alleges that the defendants were also responsible for transporting the aliens within the United States and concealing them in “stash houses” along the way. During some of the smuggling events, the defendants allegedly evaded law enforcement by travelling at high rates of speed on the road and instructing aliens how to flee U.S. Border Patrol and evade checkpoints. Additionally, the indictment alleges that one undocumented alien died from heat exposure during a smuggling event and was abandoned in the desert.

    “Human smuggling organizations threaten our national security and exploit vulnerable individuals for profit, putting their lives at risk and undermining public safety,” said Acting U.S. Attorney Holland S. Kastrin for the District of New Mexico. “The U.S. Attorney’s Office in the District of New Mexico is committed to continuing to work with our federal, state and local partners to dismantle transnational human smuggling organizations, hold their leaders accountable, and seize the illicit proceeds generated by these exploitative enterprises.”

    “We are appreciative of our brave law enforcement partners for their continued vigilance in investigating and apprehending members of transnational criminal organizations who conspire to undermine our nation’s immigration laws for their profit, with a callous and reckless disregard for the sanctity of life,” said U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Homeland Security Investigations (ICE HSI) El Paso Special Agent in Charge Jason T. Stevens. “As this case sadly demonstrates, human smuggling is a crime that takes lives and puts the public at risk. ICE HSI is passionately devoted to using its abundant authority to identify, investigate, and arrest criminals who prey on the vulnerabilities of people they treat as human cargo.”

    Michelle Martinez, 29, of El Paso, Texas; Jesus Calvillo, 44, of El Paso; Jorge Calvillo, 25, of El Paso; Abel Aguilar-Cano, 53, of Albuquerque, New Mexico; and Jose Palomino, 27, of El Paso, made their initial court appearances today in the District of New Mexico and remain in U.S. custody. Edna Valdez-China, 48, of El Paso; Leslie Nicole Calvillo, also known as Leslie Jaramillo, 24, of El Paso; and Melissa Vargas, 22, of El Paso, are in U.S. custody and will make their initial appearances on Feb. 25 in the District of New Mexico. Jorge Alberto De La Cruz-Dominguez, also known as Guero, 54, of Juarez, Mexico; Jorge Valdez China, also known as Lolo, 23, of El Paso; Jonathan Valdez-China, also known as China and Dior, 24, of Juarez; and Alma Guadalupe Valdez-China, 41, of Juarez, are also charged in the indictment.

    Each defendant is charged with conspiracy to bring to, transport, and harbor illegal aliens in the United States. If convicted, they each face a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison. A federal district court judge will determine any sentence after considering the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors.

    ICE HSI El Paso investigated the case. U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s National Targeting Center, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), ICE HSI’s Human Smuggling Unit in Washington, D.C., and the Texas Department of Public Safety provided substantial assistance with the investigation.

    Assistant U.S. Attorney Alyson R. Hehr for the District of New Mexico and Trial Attorney Jenna Reed of the Criminal Division’s Human Rights and Special Prosecutions Section (HRSP) are prosecuting the case.

    These actions are the result of the coordinated efforts of Joint Task Force Alpha (JTFA). JTFA was established in June 2021 to marshal the investigative and prosecutorial resources of the Justice Department, in partnership with DHS, to combat the rise in prolific and dangerous alien smuggling and trafficking groups operating in Mexico, Guatemala, El Salvador, Honduras, Panama, and Colombia. JTFA comprises detailees from U.S. Attorneys’ Offices along the southwest border, including the Southern District of California, District of Arizona, District of New Mexico, and Western and Southern Districts of Texas. Dedicated support is provided by numerous components of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division, led by HRSP and supported by the Office of Prosecutorial Development, Assistance and Training; Narcotic and Dangerous Drug Section; Money Laundering and Asset Recovery Section; Office of Enforcement Operations; Office of International Affairs; and Violent Crime and Racketeering Section. JTFA also relies on substantial law enforcement investment from DHS, FBI, DEA, and other partners. To date, JTFA’s work has resulted in more than 355 domestic and international arrests of leaders, organizers, and significant facilitators of alien smuggling; more than 300 U.S. convictions; more than 245 significant jail sentences imposed; and forfeitures of substantial assets.

    An indictment is merely an allegation. All defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law. 

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Security: Fourteen Members of Extensive Alien Smuggling Organization Charged and Eight Arrested for Smuggling Hundreds of Illegal Aliens into the United States

    Source: United States Attorneys General 7

    Note: View the indictment here.

    Fourteen alleged members of a prolific alien smuggling organization were charged for their roles smuggling aliens from South and Central America into the United States via the southern border.

    A grand jury in Las Cruces, New Mexico, returned an indictment on Feb. 19 against 14 individuals for conspiracy to transport, harbor, and bring in illegal aliens to the United States. Eight of those charged were arrested on Feb. 20 and 21.

    “Today’s indictment alleges that the defendants engaged in a sophisticated conspiracy to smuggle aliens into and throughout the United States at great danger to the aliens, resulting in the death of one person,” said Supervisory Official Antoinette T. Bacon of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division. “The Justice Department worked with our partners at the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to dismantle an alien smuggling organization based in Mexico that has allegedly smuggled hundreds of illegal aliens, including unaccompanied children, through New Mexico and South Texas. We are committed to eliminating transnational alien smuggling organizations that exploit migrants purely for profit and undermine our national security.”

    According to the indictment unsealed today, the defendants participated in a conspiracy to illegally bring undocumented aliens from Mexico into the United States via the U.S. southern border. The indictment alleges that the defendants were also responsible for transporting the aliens within the United States and concealing them in “stash houses” along the way. During some of the smuggling events, the defendants allegedly evaded law enforcement by travelling at high rates of speed on the road and instructing aliens how to flee U.S. Border Patrol and evade checkpoints. Additionally, the indictment alleges that one undocumented alien died from heat exposure during a smuggling event and was abandoned in the desert.

    “Human smuggling organizations threaten our national security and exploit vulnerable individuals for profit, putting their lives at risk and undermining public safety,” said Acting U.S. Attorney Holland S. Kastrin for the District of New Mexico. “The U.S. Attorney’s Office in the District of New Mexico is committed to continuing to work with our federal, state and local partners to dismantle transnational human smuggling organizations, hold their leaders accountable, and seize the illicit proceeds generated by these exploitative enterprises.”

    “We are appreciative of our brave law enforcement partners for their continued vigilance in investigating and apprehending members of transnational criminal organizations who conspire to undermine our nation’s immigration laws for their profit, with a callous and reckless disregard for the sanctity of life,” said U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Homeland Security Investigations (ICE HSI) El Paso Special Agent in Charge Jason T. Stevens. “As this case sadly demonstrates, human smuggling is a crime that takes lives and puts the public at risk. ICE HSI is passionately devoted to using its abundant authority to identify, investigate, and arrest criminals who prey on the vulnerabilities of people they treat as human cargo.”

    Michelle Martinez, 29, of El Paso, Texas; Jesus Calvillo, 44, of El Paso; Jorge Calvillo, 25, of El Paso; Abel Aguilar-Cano, 53, of Albuquerque, New Mexico; and Jose Palomino, 27, of El Paso, made their initial court appearances today in the District of New Mexico and remain in U.S. custody. Edna Valdez-China, 48, of El Paso; Leslie Nicole Calvillo, also known as Leslie Jaramillo, 24, of El Paso; and Melissa Vargas, 22, of El Paso, are in U.S. custody and will make their initial appearances on Feb. 25 in the District of New Mexico. Jorge Alberto De La Cruz-Dominguez, also known as Guero, 54, of Juarez, Mexico; Jorge Valdez China, also known as Lolo, 23, of El Paso; Jonathan Valdez-China, also known as China and Dior, 24, of Juarez; and Alma Guadalupe Valdez-China, 41, of Juarez, are also charged in the indictment.

    Each defendant is charged with conspiracy to bring to, transport, and harbor illegal aliens in the United States. If convicted, they each face a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison. A federal district court judge will determine any sentence after considering the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors.

    ICE HSI El Paso investigated the case. U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s National Targeting Center, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), ICE HSI’s Human Smuggling Unit in Washington, D.C., and the Texas Department of Public Safety provided substantial assistance with the investigation.

    Assistant U.S. Attorney Alyson R. Hehr for the District of New Mexico and Trial Attorney Jenna Reed of the Criminal Division’s Human Rights and Special Prosecutions Section (HRSP) are prosecuting the case.

    These actions are the result of the coordinated efforts of Joint Task Force Alpha (JTFA). JTFA was established in June 2021 to marshal the investigative and prosecutorial resources of the Justice Department, in partnership with DHS, to combat the rise in prolific and dangerous alien smuggling and trafficking groups operating in Mexico, Guatemala, El Salvador, Honduras, Panama, and Colombia. JTFA comprises detailees from U.S. Attorneys’ Offices along the southwest border, including the Southern District of California, District of Arizona, District of New Mexico, and Western and Southern Districts of Texas. Dedicated support is provided by numerous components of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division, led by HRSP and supported by the Office of Prosecutorial Development, Assistance and Training; Narcotic and Dangerous Drug Section; Money Laundering and Asset Recovery Section; Office of Enforcement Operations; Office of International Affairs; and Violent Crime and Racketeering Section. JTFA also relies on substantial law enforcement investment from DHS, FBI, DEA, and other partners. To date, JTFA’s work has resulted in more than 355 domestic and international arrests of leaders, organizers, and significant facilitators of alien smuggling; more than 300 U.S. convictions; more than 245 significant jail sentences imposed; and forfeitures of substantial assets.

    An indictment is merely an allegation. All defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law. 

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Video: Kash Patel Sworn In as FBI Director

    Source: United States of America – The White House (video statements)

    “I am living the American Dream. We will uphold the Constitution – we will uphold ourselves to the Constitution.” – FBI Director Kash Patel

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u9DFrjouj4Y

    MIL OSI Video

  • MIL-OSI: Viper Energy, Inc., a Subsidiary of Diamondback Energy, Inc., Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2024 Financial and Operating Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    MIDLAND, Texas, Feb. 24, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Viper Energy, Inc., (NASDAQ:VNOM) (“Viper” or the “Company”), a subsidiary of Diamondback Energy, Inc. (NASDAQ:FANG) (“Diamondback”), today announced financial and operating results for the fourth quarter and full year ended December 31, 2024.

    FOURTH QUARTER HIGHLIGHTS

    • Q4 2024 average production of 29,859 bo/d (56,109 boe/d)
    • Q4 2024 consolidated net income (including non-controlling interest) of $272.8 million; net income attributable to Viper of $210.1 million, or $2.04 per Class A common share; includes a one-time tax benefit of $155.9 million from the reversal of the valuation allowance against the Company’s deferred tax assets
    • Q4 2024 cash available for distribution to Viper’s Class A common shares (as defined and reconciled below) of $89.0 million, or $0.86 per Class A common share
    • As previously announced, declared Q4 2024 base cash dividend of $0.30 per Class A common share; implies a 2.5% annualized yield based on the February 21, 2025, share closing price of $48.33
    • As previously announced, declared Q4 2024 variable cash dividend of $0.35 per Class A common share; total base-plus-variable dividend of $0.65 per Class A common share implies a 5.4% annualized yield based on the February 21, 2025, share closing price of $48.33
    • Total Q4 2024 return of capital of $66.7 million, or $0.65 per Class A common share, represents 75% of cash available for distribution
    • 381 total gross (8.1 net 100% royalty interest) horizontal wells turned to production on Viper’s acreage during Q4 2024 with an average lateral length of 10,818 feet

    FULL YEAR 2024 HIGHLIGHTS

    • Full year 2024 average production of 27,156 bo/d (49,784 boe/d)
    • Received $6.2 million in lease bonus income
    • Full year 2024 consolidated net income (including non-controlling interest) of $603.6 million; net income attributable to Viper of $359.2 million, or $3.82 per Class A common share
    • Declared dividends of $2.49 per Class A common share during the full year 2024
    • Generated full year 2024 consolidated adjusted EBITDA (as defined and reconciled below) of $782.2 million
    • Proved reserves as of December 31, 2024 of 195,873 Mboe (84% PDP, 93,563 Mbo), up 9% year over year with oil up 4% from year end 2023
    • 1,461 total gross (27.9 net 100% royalty interest) horizontal wells turned to production on Viper’s acreage during 2024 with an average lateral length of 11,381 feet

    2025 OUTLOOK

    • As previously announced, on January 30, 2025, entered into a definitive purchase and sale agreement to acquire all of the equity interests of certain mineral and royalty interest owning subsidiaries of Diamondback in exchange for $1.0 billion of cash and approximately 69.63 million limited liability company membership interests of Viper Energy Partners LLC (“OpCo units”), along with an accompanying equal amount of Class B common stock of the Company, subject to customary closing adjustments (the “Drop Down”); expected to close in the second quarter of 2025, subject to the approval by Viper’s stockholders and clearance of other typical closing conditions
    • On February 14, 2025, closed the acquisition of certain mineral and royalty interests from Morita Ranches Minerals LLC in exchange for approximately $211.0 million of cash and approximately 2.40 million OpCo units (along with an accompanying equal amount of Class B common stock of the Company), subject to customary post-closing adjustments (the “Quinn Ranch Acquisition”)
    • Initiating average daily production guidance for Q1 2025 of 30,000 to 31,000 bo/d (54,000 to 56,000 boe/d)
    • Upon the assumed closing of the Drop Down during Q2 2025, expect average daily production for the balance of 2025 in the range of 47,000 to 49,000 bo/d (85,000 to 88,000) boe/d
    • As of December 31, 2024, there were approximately 867 gross horizontal wells in the process of active development on Viper’s acreage in which Viper expects to own an average 1.6% net royalty interest (14.1 net 100% royalty interest wells)
    • Approximately 1,191 gross (23.9 net 100% royalty interest) line-of-sight wells on Viper’s acreage that are not currently in the process of active development, but for which Viper has visibility to the potential of future development in coming quarters, based on Diamondback’s current completion schedule and third-party operators’ permits

    “The fourth quarter concluded a landmark year for Viper. For the full year, we continued to deliver strong organic production growth on our legacy assets and successfully executed on our differentiated acquisition strategy. Looking ahead, we continue to be excited about the transformative Drop Down transaction between Viper and Diamondback that was previously announced. We look forward to working toward a timely closing of the transaction and the unmatched forward outlook Viper will be provided upon that closing,” stated Kaes Van’t Hof, Chief Executive Officer of Viper.

    FINANCIAL UPDATE

    Viper’s fourth quarter 2024 average unhedged realized prices were $69.91 per barrel of oil, $0.84 per Mcf of natural gas and $22.15 per barrel of natural gas liquids, resulting in a total equivalent realized price of $43.56/boe.

    Viper’s fourth quarter 2024 average hedged realized prices were $69.00 per barrel of oil, $1.05 per Mcf of natural gas and $22.15 per barrel of natural gas liquids, resulting in a total equivalent realized price of $43.38/boe.

    During the fourth quarter of 2024, the Company recorded total operating income of $228.7 million and consolidated net income (including non-controlling interest) of $272.8 million. During the quarter, the Company reversed the valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets as of the quarter and year ended December 31, 2024, with an accompanying $155.9 million deferred tax benefit recorded through continuing operations.

    As of December 31, 2024, the Company had a cash balance of $26.9 million and total long-term debt outstanding (excluding debt issuance costs, discounts and premiums) of $1.1 billion, resulting in net debt (as defined and reconciled below) of $1.1 billion. Viper’s outstanding long-term debt as of December 31, 2024 consisted of $430.4 million in aggregate principal amount of its 5.375% Senior Notes due 2027, $400.0 million in aggregate principal amount of its 7.375% Senior Notes due 2031 and $261.0 million in borrowings on its revolving credit facility, leaving $989.0 million available for future borrowings and $1.0 billion of total liquidity.

    FOURTH QUARTER 2024 CASH DIVIDEND & CAPITAL RETURN PROGRAM

    As previously announced, the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Viper Energy, Inc., declared a base dividend of $0.30 per Class A common share for the fourth quarter of 2024 payable on March 13, 2025 to Class A common shareholders of record at the close of business on March 6, 2025.

    The Board also declared a variable cash dividend of $0.35 per Class A common share for the fourth quarter of 2024 payable on March 13, 2025 to Class A common shareholders of record at the close of business on March 6, 2025.

    OPERATIONS UPDATE

    During the fourth quarter of 2024, Viper estimates that 381 gross (8.1 net 100% royalty interest) horizontal wells with an average royalty interest of 2.1% were turned to production on its acreage position with an average lateral length of 10,818 feet. Of these 381 gross wells, Diamondback is the operator of 88 gross wells, with an average royalty interest of 6.4%, and the remaining 293 gross wells, with an average royalty interest of 0.9%, are operated by third parties.

    Viper’s footprint of mineral and royalty interests was 35,671 net royalty acres as of December 31, 2024.

    Our gross well information as of December 31, 2024 is as follows, unless otherwise specified:

      Diamondback Operated   Third-Party Operated   Total
    Horizontal wells turned to production (fourth quarter 2024)(1):          
    Gross wells 88   293   381
    Net 100% royalty interest wells 5.6   2.5   8.1
    Average percent net royalty interest 6.4%   0.9%   2.1%
               
    Horizontal wells turned to production (year ended December 31, 2024)(2):          
    Gross wells 285   1,176   1,461
    Net 100% royalty interest wells 16.0   11.9   27.9
    Average percent net royalty interest 5.6%   1.0%   1.9%
               
    Horizontal producing well count:          
    Gross wells 2,898   8,161   11,059
    Net 100% royalty interest wells 156.3   104.1   260.4
    Average percent net royalty interest 5.4%   1.3%   2.4%
               
    Horizontal active development well count:          
    Gross wells 146   721   867
    Net 100% royalty interest wells 6.0   8.1   14.1
    Average percent net royalty interest 4.1%   1.1%   1.6%
               
    Line of sight wells:          
    Gross wells 324   867   1,191
    Net 100% royalty interest wells 10.1   13.8   23.9
    Average percent net royalty interest 3.1%   1.6%   2.0%

    (1) Average lateral length of 10,818 feet.
    (2) Average lateral length of 11,381 feet.

    The 867 gross wells currently in the process of active development are those wells that have been spud and are expected to be turned to production within approximately the next six to eight months. Further in regard to the active development on Viper’s asset base, there are currently 54 gross rigs operating on Viper’s acreage, 10 of which are operated by Diamondback. The 1,191 line-of-sight wells are those that are not currently in the process of active development, but for which Viper has reason to believe that they will be turned to production within approximately the next 15 to 18 months. The expected timing of these line-of-sight wells is based primarily on permitting by third-party operators or Diamondback’s current expected completion schedule. Existing permits or active development of Viper’s royalty acreage does not ensure that those wells will be turned to production.

    YEAR END RESERVES UPDATE

    Viper’s proved oil and natural gas reserve estimates and their associated future net cash flows were prepared by Viper’s internal reservoir engineers, and audited by Ryder Scott Company, L.P., independent petroleum engineers, as of December 31, 2024. Reference prices of $75.48 per barrel of oil and natural gas liquids and $2.13 per MMbtu of natural gas were used in accordance with applicable rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Realized prices with applicable differentials were $75.61 per barrel of oil, $0.49 per Mcf of natural gas and $20.62 per barrel of natural gas liquids.

    Proved reserves at year-end 2024 of 195,873 Mboe (93,563 Mbo) represent a 9% increase over year-end 2023 reserves. The year-end 2024 proved reserves have a PV-10 value (as defined and reconciled below) of approximately $3.7 billion and a standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows of $3.3 billion.

    Proved developed reserves increased by 14% year over year to 163,865 Mboe (76,020 Mbo) as of December 31, 2024, reflecting continued horizontal development by the operators of Viper’s acreage.

    Net proved reserve additions of 34,845 Mboe resulted in a reserve replacement ratio of 191% (defined as the sum of extensions, discoveries, revisions, purchases and divestitures, divided by annual production). The organic reserve replacement ratio was 121% (defined as the sum of extensions, discoveries and revisions, divided by annual production).

    Extensions and discoveries of 24,936 Mboe are primarily attributable to the drilling of 1,170 new wells and from 447 new proved undeveloped locations added. The Company’s total downward revisions of previous estimated quantities of 2,894 Mboe consist of negative revisions of 6,539 Mboe associated with lower commodity prices and PUD downgrades of 2,936 Mboe offset by positive revisions of 6,580 Mboe primarily attributable to performance revisions. The purchase of reserves in place of 14,941 Mboe resulted primarily from the previously reported Tumbleweed acquisitions and other acquisitions of certain mineral and royalty interests.

      Oil (MBbls)   Gas (MMcf)   Liquids (MBbls)   Mboe
    As of December 31, 2023 89,903     263,578     45,416     179,249  
    Purchase of reserves in place 7,891     20,310     3,665     14,941  
    Extensions and discoveries 13,099     33,498     6,254     24,936  
    Revisions of previous estimates (6,472 )   4,449     2,837     (2,894 )
    Divestitures (919 )   (4,605 )   (451 )   (2,138 )
    Production (9,939 )   (24,606 )   (4,181 )   (18,221 )
    As of December 31, 2024 93,563     292,624     53,540     195,873  
                           

    As the owner of mineral and royalty interests, Viper incurred no exploration and development costs during the year ended December 31, 2024.

      December 31,
      2024
      2023
      2022
      (in thousands)
    Acquisition costs:          
    Proved properties $ 340,907     $ 402,659     $ 46,307  
    Unproved properties   830,450       758,342       16,624  
    Total $ 1,171,357     $ 1,161,001     $ 62,931  
                           

    GUIDANCE UPDATE

    Below is Viper’s guidance for Q1 2025. Guidance for full year 2025 will be provided pending the closing of the Drop Down.

       
      Viper Energy, Inc.
       
    Q1 2025 Net Production – Mbo/d 30.00 – 31.00
    Q1 2025 Net Production – Mboe/d 54.00 – 56.00
       
    Unit costs ($/boe)  
    Depletion $12.25 – $12.75
    Cash G&A $0.80 – $1.00
    Non-Cash Share-Based Compensation $0.10 – $0.20
    Net Interest Expense $2.50 – $3.00
       
    Production and Ad Valorem Taxes (% of Revenue) ~7%
    Cash Tax Rate (% of Pre-Tax Income Attributable to Viper Energy, Inc.)(1) 20% – 22%
    Q1 2025 Cash Taxes ($ – million)(2) $15.0 – $20.0

    (1)   Pre-tax income attributable to Viper Energy, Inc. is reconciled below.
    (2)   Attributable to Viper Energy, Inc.

    CONFERENCE CALL

    Viper will host a conference call and webcast for investors and analysts to discuss its results for the fourth quarter of 2024 on Tuesday, February 25, 2025 at 10:00 a.m. CT. Access to the live audio-only webcast, and replay which will be available following the call, may be found here. The live webcast of the earnings conference call will also be available via Viper’s website at www.viperenergy.com under the “Investor Relations” section of the site.

    About Viper Energy, Inc.

    Viper is a corporation formed by Diamondback to own, acquire and exploit oil and natural gas properties in North America, with a focus on owning and acquiring mineral and royalty interests in oil-weighted basins, primarily the Permian Basin. For more information, please visit www.viperenergy.com.

    About Diamondback Energy, Inc.

    Diamondback is an independent oil and natural gas company headquartered in Midland, Texas focused on the acquisition, development, exploration and exploitation of unconventional, onshore oil and natural gas reserves primarily in the Permian Basin in West Texas. For more information, please visit www.diamondbackenergy.com.

    Forward-Looking Statements

    This news release contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which involve risks, uncertainties, and assumptions. All statements, other than statements of historical fact, including statements regarding Viper’s: future performance; business strategy; future operations; estimates and projections of operating income, losses, costs and expenses, returns, cash flow, and financial position; production levels on properties in which Viper has mineral and royalty interests, developmental activity by other operators; reserve estimates and Viper’s ability to replace or increase reserves; anticipated benefits or other effects of strategic transactions (including the pending Drop Down and other acquisitions or divestitures); and plans and objectives (including Diamondback’s plans for developing Viper’s acreage and Viper’s cash dividend policy and common stock repurchase program) are forward-looking statements. When used in this news release, the words “aim,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “continue,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “forecast,” “future,” “guidance,” “intend,” “may,” “model,” “outlook,” “plan,” “positioned,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “seek,” “should,” “target,” “will,” “would,” and similar expressions (including the negative of such terms) as they relate to Viper are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain such identifying words. Although Viper believes that the expectations and assumptions reflected in its forward-looking statements are reasonable as and when made, they involve risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict and, in many cases, beyond its control. Accordingly, forward-looking statements are not guarantees of Viper’s future performance and the actual outcomes could differ materially from what Viper expressed in its forward-looking statements.

    Factors that could cause the outcomes to differ materially include (but are not limited to) the following: changes in supply and demand levels for oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids, and the resulting impact on the price for those commodities; the impact of public health crises, including epidemic or pandemic diseases, and any related company or government policies or actions; actions taken by the members of OPEC and Russia affecting the production and pricing of oil, as well as other domestic and global political, economic, or diplomatic developments, including any impact of the ongoing war in Ukraine and the Israel-Hamas war on the global energy markets and geopolitical stability; instability in the financial sector; higher interest rates and their impact on the cost of capital; regional supply and demand factors, including delays, curtailment delays or interruptions of production on Viper’s mineral and royalty acreage, or governmental orders, rules or regulations that impose production limits on such acreage; federal and state legislative and regulatory initiatives relating to hydraulic fracturing, including the effect of existing and future laws and governmental regulations; physical and transition risks relating to climate change and the risks and other factors disclosed in Viper’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including its Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K, which can be obtained free of charge on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s web site at http://www.sec.gov.

    In light of these factors, the events anticipated by Viper’s forward-looking statements may not occur at the time anticipated or at all. Moreover, new risks emerge from time to time. Viper cannot predict all risks, nor can it assess the impact of all factors on its business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated by any forward-looking statements it may make. Accordingly, you should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements made in this news release. All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this news release or, if earlier, as of the date they were made. Viper does not intend to, and disclaims any obligation to, update or revise any forward-looking statements unless required by applicable law.

     
    Viper Energy, Inc.
    Consolidated Balance Sheets
    (unaudited, in thousands, except share amounts)
           
      December 31,
      2024   2023
    Assets      
    Current assets:      
    Cash and cash equivalents $ 26,851     $ 25,869  
    Royalty income receivable (net of allowance for credit losses)   149,234       108,681  
    Royalty income receivable—related party   30,971       3,329  
    Income tax receivable   2,238       813  
    Derivative instruments   17,638       358  
    Prepaid expenses and other current assets   11,112       4,467  
    Total current assets   238,044       143,517  
    Property:      
    Oil and natural gas interests, full cost method of accounting ($2,179,837 and $1,769,341 excluded from depletion at December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, respectively)   5,712,671       4,628,983  
    Land   5,688       5,688  
    Accumulated depletion and impairment   (1,080,764 )     (866,352 )
    Property, net   4,637,595       3,768,319  
    Derivative instruments         92  
    Deferred income taxes (net of allowances)   185,235       56,656  
    Other assets   8,166       5,509  
    Total assets $ 5,069,040     $ 3,974,093  
    Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity      
    Current liabilities:      
    Accounts payable $ 85     $ 19  
    Accounts payable—related party   1,980       1,330  
    Accrued liabilities   42,272       27,021  
    Derivative instruments   2,323       2,961  
    Income taxes payable   2,034       1,925  
    Total current liabilities   48,694       33,256  
    Long-term debt, net   1,082,979       1,083,082  
    Derivative instruments         201  
    Other long-term liabilities   30,148        
    Total liabilities   1,161,821       1,116,539  
    Stockholders’ equity:      
    Class A Common Stock, $0.000001 par value: 1,000,000,000 shares authorized; 102,977,142 and 86,144,273 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, respectively          
    Class B Common Stock, $0.000001 par value: 1,000,000,000 shares authorized; 85,431,453 and 90,709,946 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, respectively          
    Additional paid-in capital   1,568,560       1,031,078  
    Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)   118,444       (16,786 )
    Total Viper Energy, Inc. stockholders’ equity   1,687,004       1,014,292  
    Non-controlling interest   2,220,215       1,843,262  
    Total equity   3,907,219       2,857,554  
    Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $ 5,069,040     $ 3,974,093  
                   
     
    Viper Energy, Inc.
    Consolidated Statements of Operations
    (unaudited, in thousands, except per share data)
                   
      Three Months Ended December 31,   Year Ended December 31,
      2024   2023   2024   2023
    Operating income:              
    Oil income $ 192,040     $ 175,254     $ 750,243     $ 619,181  
    Natural gas income   6,050       7,979       14,813       30,953  
    Natural gas liquids income   26,775       18,981       88,520       66,976  
    Royalty income   224,865       202,214       853,576       717,110  
    Lease bonus income—related party         2,238       227       107,823  
    Lease bonus income   3,655       125       5,944       1,855  
    Other operating income   179       135       640       909  
    Total operating income   228,699       204,712       860,387       827,697  
    Costs and expenses:              
    Production and ad valorem taxes   16,162       12,607       60,882       50,401  
    Depletion   64,591       44,787       214,412       146,118  
    General and administrative expenses—related party   3,150       924       10,541       3,696  
    General and administrative expenses   1,388       3,027       8,100       6,907  
    Other operating (income) expense   58       356       55       356  
    Total costs and expenses   85,349       61,701       293,990       207,478  
    Income (loss) from operations   143,350       143,011       566,397       620,219  
    Other income (expense):              
    Interest expense, net   (19,112 )     (15,756 )     (73,848 )     (47,392 )
    Gain (loss) on derivative instruments, net   6,122       4,892       11,386       (25,793 )
    Other income, net         1             259  
    Total other expense, net   (12,990 )     (10,863 )     (62,462 )     (72,926 )
    Income (loss) before income taxes   130,360       132,148       503,935       547,293  
    Provision for (benefit from) income taxes   (142,440 )     6,217       (99,711 )     45,952  
    Net income (loss)   272,800       125,931       603,646       501,341  
    Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interest   62,733       68,959       244,401       301,253  
    Net income (loss) attributable to Viper Energy, Inc. $ 210,067     $ 56,972     $ 359,245     $ 200,088  
                   
    Net income (loss) attributable to common shares:              
    Basic $ 2.04     $ 0.70     $ 3.82     $ 2.69  
    Diluted $ 2.04     $ 0.70     $ 3.82     $ 2.69  
    Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:              
    Basic   102,977       81,219       93,932       74,176  
    Diluted   102,977       81,219       93,932       74,176  
                                   
     
    Viper Energy, Inc.
    Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
    (unaudited, in thousands)
                   
      Three Months Ended December 31,   Year Ended December 31,
      2024   2023   2024   2023
    Cash flows from operating activities:              
    Net income (loss) $ 272,800     $ 125,931     $ 603,646     $ 501,341  
    Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:              
    Provision for (benefit from) deferred income taxes   (148,580 )     (7,887 )     (149,085 )     (7,000 )
    Depletion   64,591       44,787       214,412       146,118  
    (Gain) loss on derivative instruments, net   (6,122 )     (4,892 )     (11,386 )     25,793  
    Net cash receipts (payments) on derivatives   (940 )     (3,300 )     (2,978 )     (13,319 )
    Other   1,727       1,397       6,197       3,442  
    Changes in operating assets and liabilities:              
    Royalty income receivable   (16,135 )     (5,232 )     (13,249 )     (27,379 )
    Royalty income receivable—related party   5,025       4,102       (27,642 )     2,931  
    Accounts payable and accrued liabilities   (7,190 )     2,155       7,002       6,311  
    Accounts payable—related party   1,981       1,330       651       1,024  
    Income taxes payable   218       (11,397 )     109       1,014  
    Other   (9,467 )     (1,199 )     (8,069 )     (2,084 )
    Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities   157,908       145,795       619,608       638,192  
    Cash flows from investing activities:              
    Acquisitions of oil and natural gas interests—related party                     (75,073 )
    Acquisitions of oil and natural gas interests   (425,190 )     (731,618 )     (696,242 )     (830,128 )
    Proceeds from sale of oil and natural gas interests   (5 )     2       87,669       (3,164 )
    Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities   (425,195 )     (731,616 )     (608,573 )     (908,365 )
    Cash flows from financing activities:              
    Proceeds from borrowings under credit facility   372,000       313,000       842,000       573,000  
    Repayment on credit facility   (111,000 )     (300,000 )     (844,000 )     (462,000 )
    Proceeds from Notes         400,000             400,000  
    Net proceeds from public offering   2             475,906        
    Proceeds from public offering to Diamondback         200,000             200,000  
    Repurchased shares/units under buyback program         (28,040 )           (95,221 )
    Dividends/distributions to stockholders   (62,912 )     (44,596 )     (219,465 )     (128,777 )
    Dividends/distributions to Diamondback   (62,386 )     (68,047 )     (254,216 )     (195,976 )
    Dividends to other non-controlling interest   (7,368 )           (7,368 )      
    Other   (2,847 )     (7,441 )     (2,910 )     (13,163 )
    Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities   125,489       464,876       (10,053 )     277,863  
    Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents   (141,798 )     (120,945 )     982       7,690  
    Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period   168,649       146,814       25,869       18,179  
    Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period $ 26,851     $ 25,869     $ 26,851     $ 25,869  
                                   
     
    Viper Energy, Inc.
    Selected Operating Data
    (unaudited)
                   
      Three Months Ended December 31,   Year Ended December 31,
      2024
      2023
      2024
      2023
    Production Data:              
    Oil (MBbls)   2,747       2,257       9,939       8,028  
    Natural gas (MMcf)   7,236       5,321       24,606       19,130  
    Natural gas liquids (MBbls)   1,209       884       4,181       3,108  
    Combined volumes (Mboe)(1)   5,162       4,028       18,221       14,324  
                   
    Average daily oil volumes (bo/d)   29,859       24,533       27,156       21,995  
    Average daily combined volumes (boe/d)   56,109       43,783       49,784       39,244  
                   
    Average sales prices:              
    Oil ($/Bbl) $ 69.91     $ 77.65     $ 75.48     $ 77.13  
    Natural gas ($/Mcf) $ 0.84     $ 1.50     $ 0.60     $ 1.62  
    Natural gas liquids ($/Bbl) $ 22.15     $ 21.47     $ 21.17     $ 21.55  
    Combined ($/boe)(2) $ 43.56     $ 50.20     $ 46.85     $ 50.06  
                   
    Oil, hedged ($/Bbl)(3) $ 69.00     $ 76.56     $ 74.57     $ 76.05  
    Natural gas, hedged ($/Mcf)(3) $ 1.05     $ 1.34     $ 0.85     $ 1.37  
    Natural gas liquids ($/Bbl)(3) $ 22.15     $ 21.47     $ 21.17     $ 21.55  
    Combined price, hedged ($/boe)(3) $ 43.38     $ 49.38     $ 46.68     $ 49.13  
                   
    Average Costs ($/boe):              
    Production and ad valorem taxes $ 3.13     $ 3.13     $ 3.34     $ 3.52  
    General and administrative – cash component   0.72       0.90       0.86       0.65  
    Total operating expense – cash $ 3.85     $ 4.03     $ 4.20     $ 4.17  
                   
    General and administrative – non-cash stock compensation expense $ 0.16     $ 0.08     $ 0.16     $ 0.09  
    Interest expense, net $ 3.70     $ 3.91     $ 4.05     $ 3.31  
    Depletion $ 12.51     $ 11.12     $ 11.77     $ 10.20  

    (1)   Bbl equivalents are calculated using a conversion rate of six Mcf per one Bbl.
    (2)   Realized price net of all deducts for gathering, transportation and processing.
    (3)   Hedged prices reflect the impact of cash settlements of our matured commodity derivative transactions on our average sales prices.

    NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

    Adjusted EBITDA is a supplemental non-GAAP (as defined below) financial measure that is used by management and external users of our financial statements, such as industry analysts, investors, lenders and rating agencies. Viper defines Adjusted EBITDA as net income (loss) attributable to Viper Energy, Inc. plus net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interest (“net income (loss)”) before interest expense, net, non-cash share-based compensation expense, depletion, non-cash (gain) loss on derivative instruments, (gain) loss on extinguishment of debt, if any, other non-cash operating expenses, other non-recurring expenses and provision for (benefit from) income taxes. Adjusted EBITDA is not a measure of net income as determined by United States’ generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). Management believes Adjusted EBITDA is useful because it allows them to more effectively evaluate Viper’s operating performance and compare the results of its operations from period to period without regard to its financing methods or capital structure. Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered as an alternative to, or more meaningful than, net income, royalty income, cash flow from operating activities or any other measure of financial performance or liquidity presented as determined in accordance with GAAP. Certain items excluded from Adjusted EBITDA are significant components in understanding and assessing a company’s financial performance, such as a company’s cost of capital and tax structure, as well as the historic costs of depreciable assets, none of which are components of Adjusted EBITDA.

    Viper defines cash available for distribution to Viper Energy, Inc. shareholders generally as an amount equal to its Adjusted EBITDA for the applicable quarter less cash needed for income taxes payable for the current period, debt service, contractual obligations, fixed charges and reserves for future operating or capital needs that the Board may deem appropriate, lease bonus income, net of tax, distribution equivalent rights payments, preferred dividends, and an adjustment for changes in ownership interests that occurred subsequent to the quarter, if any. Management believes cash available for distribution is useful because it allows them to more effectively evaluate Viper’s operating performance excluding the impact of non-cash financial items and short-term changes in working capital. Viper’s computations of Adjusted EBITDA and cash available for distribution may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies or to such measure in its credit facility or any of its other contracts. Viper further defines cash available for variable dividends as at least 75 percent of cash available for distribution less base dividends declared and repurchased shares as part of its share buyback program for the applicable quarter.

    The following tables present a reconciliation of the GAAP financial measure of net income (loss) to the non-GAAP financial measures of Adjusted EBITDA, cash available for distribution and cash available for variable dividends:

    Viper Energy, Inc.
    (unaudited, in thousands, except per share data)
           
      Three Months Ended December 31, 2024   Year Ended December 31, 2024
    Net income (loss) attributable to Viper Energy, Inc. $ 210,067     $ 359,245  
    Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interest   62,733       244,401  
    Net income (loss)   272,800       603,646  
    Interest expense, net   19,112       73,848  
    Non-cash share-based compensation expense   815       2,975  
    Depletion   64,591       214,412  
    Non-cash (gain) loss on derivative instruments   (7,062 )     (14,364 )
    Other non-cash operating expenses   58       55  
    Other non-recurring expenses         1,314  
    Provision for (benefit from) income taxes   (142,440 )     (99,711 )
    Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA   207,874       782,175  
    Less: Adjusted EBITDA attributable to non-controlling interest   100,035       371,813  
    Adjusted EBITDA attributable to Viper Energy, Inc. $ 107,839     $ 410,362  
           
    Adjustments to reconcile Adjusted EBITDA to cash available for distribution:      
    Income taxes payable for the current period $ (6,139 )   $ (49,372 )
    Debt service, contractual obligations, fixed charges and reserves   (11,118 )     (39,219 )
    Lease bonus income, net of tax   (1,502 )     (2,510 )
    Distribution equivalent rights payments   (98 )     (393 )
    Preferred distributions   (20 )     (80 )
    Cash available for distribution to Viper Energy, Inc. shareholders $ 88,962     $ 318,788  
      Three Months Ended December 31, 2024
      Amounts   Amounts Per Common Share
    Reconciliation to cash available for variable dividends:      
    Cash available for distribution to Viper Energy, Inc. shareholders $ 88,962     $ 0.86  
           
    Return of Capital $ 66,722     $ 0.65  
    Less:      
    Base dividend   30,893       0.30  
    Cash available for variable dividends $ 35,829     $ 0.35  
           
    Total approved base and variable dividend per share     $ 0.65  
           
    Class A common stock outstanding       102,977  
               

    The following table presents a reconciliation of the GAAP financial measure of income (loss) before income taxes to the non-GAAP financial measure of pre-tax income attributable to Viper Energy, Inc. Management believes this measure is useful to investors given it provides the basis for income taxes payable by Viper Energy, Inc, which is an adjustment to reconcile Adjusted EBITDA to cash available for distribution to holders of Viper Energy, Inc.’s Class A common stock.

     
    Viper Energy, Inc.
    Pre-tax income attributable to Viper Energy, Inc.
    (unaudited, in thousands)
       
      Three Months Ended December 31, 2024
    Income (loss) before income taxes $ 130,360  
    Less: Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interest   62,733  
    Pre-tax income attributable to Viper Energy, Inc. $ 67,627  
       
    Income taxes payable for the current period $ 6,139  
    Effective cash tax rate attributable to Viper Energy, Inc.   9.1 %
           

    Adjusted net income (loss) is a non-GAAP financial measure equal to net income (loss) attributable to Viper Energy, Inc. plus net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interest adjusted for non-cash (gain) loss on derivative instruments, net, (gain) loss on extinguishment of debt, if any, other non-cash operating expenses, other non-recurring expenses and related income tax adjustments. The Company’s computation of adjusted net income may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies or to such measure in our credit facility or any of our other contracts. Management believes adjusted net income helps investors in the oil and natural gas industry to measure and compare the Company’s performance to other oil and natural gas companies by excluding from the calculation items that can vary significantly from company to company depending upon accounting methods, the book value of assets and other non-operational factors.

    The following table presents a reconciliation of the GAAP financial measure of net income (loss) attributable to Viper Energy, Inc. to the non-GAAP financial measure of adjusted net income (loss):

    Viper Energy, Inc.
    Adjusted Net Income (Loss)
    (unaudited, in thousands, except per share data)
       
      Three Months Ended December 31, 2024
      Amounts   Amounts Per Diluted Share
    Net income (loss) attributable to Viper Energy, Inc.(1) $ 210,067     $ 2.04  
    Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interest   62,733       0.61  
    Net income (loss)(1)   272,800       2.65  
    Non-cash (gain) loss on derivative instruments, net   (7,062 )     (0.07 )
    Other non-cash operating expenses   58        
    Adjusted income excluding above items(1)   265,796       2.58  
    Income tax adjustment for above items   (7,653 )     (0.08 )
    Adjusted net income (loss)(1)   258,143       2.50  
    Less: Adjusted net income (loss) attributed to non-controlling interests   59,211       0.57  
    Adjusted net income (loss) attributable to Viper Energy, Inc.(1) $ 198,932     $ 1.93  
           
    Weighted average Class A common shares outstanding:      
    Basic   102,977  
    Diluted   102,977  

    (1) The Company’s earnings (loss) per diluted share amount has been computed using the two-class method in accordance with GAAP. The two-class method is an earnings allocation which reflects the respective ownership among holders of Class A common shares and participating securities. Diluted earnings per share using the two-class method is calculated as (i) net income attributable to Viper Energy, Inc., (ii) less the reallocation of $0.4 million in earnings attributable to participating securities, and (iii) divided by diluted weighted average Class A common shares outstanding.

    RECONCILIATION OF LONG-TERM DEBT TO NET DEBT

    The Company defines the non-GAAP measure of net debt as debt (excluding debt issuance costs, discounts and premiums) less cash and cash equivalents. Net debt should not be considered an alternative to, or more meaningful than, total debt, the most directly comparable GAAP measure. Management uses net debt to determine the Company’s outstanding debt obligations that would not be readily satisfied by its cash and cash equivalents on hand. The Company believes this metric is useful to analysts and investors in determining the Company’s leverage position because the Company has the ability to, and may decide to, use a portion of its cash and cash equivalents to reduce debt.

                           
      December 31, 2024   Net QPrincipal Borrowings/ (Repayments)   September 30, 2024   June 30, 2024   March 31, 2024   December 31, 2023
      (in thousands)
    Total long-term debt(1) $ 1,091,350     $ 261,000     $ 830,350     $ 1,007,350     $ 1,103,350     $ 1,093,350  
    Cash and cash equivalents   (26,851 )         (168,649 )     (35,211 )     (20,005 )     (25,869 )
    Net debt $ 1,064,499         $ 661,701     $ 972,139     $ 1,083,345     $ 1,067,481  

    (1) Excludes debt issuance costs, discounts & premiums.

    PV-10

    PV-10 is the Company’s estimate of the present value of the future net revenues from proved oil and natural gas reserves after deducting estimated production and ad valorem taxes, future capital costs and operating expenses, but before deducting any estimates of future income taxes. The estimated future net revenues are discounted at an annual rate of 10% to determine their “present value.” The Company believes PV-10 to be an important measure for evaluating the relative significance of its oil and natural gas properties and that the presentation of the non-GAAP financial measure of PV-10 provides useful information to investors because it is widely used by professional analysts and investors in evaluating oil and natural gas companies. Because there are many unique factors that can impact an individual company when estimating the amount of future income taxes to be paid, the Company believes the use of a pre-tax measure is valuable for evaluating the Company. The Company believes that PV-10 is a financial measure routinely used and calculated similarly by other companies in the oil and natural gas industry.

    The following table reconciles the Company’s standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows, a GAAP financial measure to PV-10, a non-GAAP financial measure. PV-10 should not be considered as an alternative to the standardized measure as computed under GAAP.

       
    (in thousands) December 31, 2024
    Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows after taxes $ 3,319,544  
    Add: Present value of future income tax discounted at 10%   364,976  
    PV-10 $ 3,684,520  
           

    Derivatives

    As of the filing date, the Company had the following outstanding derivative contracts. The Company’s derivative contracts are based upon reported settlement prices on commodity exchanges, with crude oil derivative settlements based on New York Mercantile Exchange West Texas Intermediate pricing and Crude Oil Brent. When aggregating multiple contracts, the weighted average contract price is disclosed.

       
      Crude Oil (Bbls/day, $/Bbl)
      Q1 2025   Q2 2025   Q3 2025   Q4 2025   FY 2026   FY 2027
    Deferred Premium Puts – WTI (Cushing)   20,000       20,000       18,000                    
    Strike $ 55.00     $ 55.00     $ 55.00     $     $     $  
    Premium $ (1.62 )   $ (1.61 )   $ (1.60 )   $     $     $  
      Natural Gas (Mmbtu/day, $/Mmbtu)
      Q1 2025   Q2 2025   Q3 2025   Q4 2025   FY 2026   FY 2027
    Costless Collars – Henry Hub   60,000       60,000       60,000       60,000       60,000        
    Floor $ 2.50     $ 2.50     $ 2.50     $ 2.50     $ 2.75     $  
    Ceiling $ 4.93     $ 4.93     $ 4.93     $ 4.93     $ 6.64     $  
      Natural Gas (Mmbtu/day, $/Mmbtu)
      Q1 2025   Q2 2025   Q3 2025   Q4 2025   FY 2026   FY 2027
    Natural Gas Basis Swaps – Waha Hub   60,000       60,000       60,000       60,000       40,000       40,000  
    Swap Price $ (0.80 )   $ (0.80 )   $ (0.80 )   $ (0.80 )   $ (1.40 )   $ (1.40 )
                                                   

    Investor Contact:

    Chip Seale
    +1 432.247.6218
    cseale@viperenergy.com

    Source: Viper Energy, Inc.; Diamondback Energy, Inc.

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: Diamondback Energy, Inc. Announces Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2024 Financial and Operating Results; Increases Base Dividend

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    MIDLAND, Texas, Feb. 24, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Diamondback Energy, Inc. (NASDAQ: FANG) (“Diamondback” or the “Company”) today announced financial and operating results for the fourth quarter and full year ended December 31, 2024.

    FOURTH QUARTER 2024 HIGHLIGHTS

    • Average production of 475.9 MBO/d (883.4 MBOE/d)
    • Net cash provided by operating activities of $2.3 billion; Operating Cash Flow Before Working Capital Changes (as defined and reconciled below) of $2.3 billion
    • Cash capital expenditures of $933 million
    • Free Cash Flow (as defined and reconciled below) of $1.3 billion; Adjusted Free Cash Flow (as defined and reconciled below) of $1.4 billion
    • Increased annual base dividend by 11% to $4.00 per share; declared Q4 2024 base cash dividend of $1.00 per share payable on March 13, 2025; implies a 2.6% annualized yield based on February 21, 2025 closing share price of $156.12
    • Repurchased 2,326,247 shares of common stock in Q4 2024 for $402 million, excluding excise tax (at a weighted average price of $172.91 per share); repurchased 1,254,600 shares of common stock to date in Q1 2025 for $210 million, excluding excise tax (at a weighted average price of $167.42 per share)
    • Total Q4 2024 return of capital of $694 million; represents ~51% of Adjusted Free Cash Flow (as defined and reconciled below) from stock repurchases and the declared Q4 2024 base dividend
    • Closed previously announced TRP Energy (“TRP”) transaction in December 2024

    FULL YEAR 2024 HIGHLIGHTS

    • Average production of 337.0 MBO/d (598.3 MBOE/d)
    • Net cash provided by operating activities of $6.4 billion; Operating Cash Flow Before Working Capital Changes (as defined and reconciled below) of $6.5 billion
    • Cash capital expenditures of $2.9 billion
    • Free Cash Flow (as defined and reconciled below) of $3.6 billion; Adjusted Free Cash Flow (as defined and reconciled below) of $4.0 billion
    • Declared total base-plus-variable dividends of $6.21 per share for the full year 2024
    • Repurchased 5,525,276 shares of common stock in 2024 for $959 million, excluding excise tax (at a weighted average price of $173.57 per share)
    • Total full year 2024 return of capital of $2.3 billion; represents ~57% of FY 2024 Adjusted Free Cash Flow (as defined and reconciled below)
    • As previously announced, closed merger with Endeavor Energy Resources, L.P. (“Endeavor”) on September 10, 2024
    • Proved reserves as of December 31, 2024 of 3,557 MMBOE (1,761 MMBO, 50% oil), up 63% year over year; proved developed producing (“PDP”) reserves of 2,385 MMBOE (1,121 MMBO, 47% oil, 67% of proved reserves), up 59% year over year

    2025 GUIDANCE HIGHLIGHTS

    Please note the guidance below gives effect to the pending acquisition of Double Eagle IV Midco, LLC (“Double Eagle”) from April 1, 2025 onward.

    • Full year 2025 oil production guidance of 485 – 498 MBO/d (883 – 909 MBOE/d)
    • Full year 2025 cash capital expenditures guidance of $3.8 – $4.2 billion
    • The Company expects to drill between 446 – 471 gross (406 – 428 net) wells and complete between 557 – 592 gross (526 – 560 net) wells with an average lateral length of approximately 11,500 feet in 2025
    • Q1 2025 oil production guidance of 470 – 475 MBO/d (860 – 875 MBOE/d)
    • Q1 2025 cash capital expenditures guidance of $900 million – $1.0 billion
    • Implies Q2 2025 – Q4 2025 run-rate oil production of 490 – 505 MBO/d (891 – 920 MBOE/d)
    • Full year 2025 Midland Basin well costs per lateral foot guidance of $555 – $605
    • Implies full year 2025 oil production per million dollars of cash capital expenditures (“MBO per $MM of CAPEX”) of 44.8, 10% better than the Company’s original pro forma 2025 outlook provided in February 2024

    OPERATIONS UPDATE

    The tables below provide a summary of operating activity for the fourth quarter of 2024.

    Total Activity (Gross Operated):          
      Number of Wells Drilled
      Number of Wells Completed
    Midland Basin 131     124  
    Delaware Basin 6     4  
    Total 137     128  
    Total Activity (Net Operated):          
      Number of Wells Drilled
      Number of Wells Completed
    Midland Basin 124     113  
    Delaware Basin 5     4  
    Total 129     117  

    During the fourth quarter of 2024, Diamondback drilled 131 gross wells in the Midland Basin and six gross wells in the Delaware Basin. The Company turned 124 operated wells to production in the Midland Basin and four gross wells in the Delaware Basin, with an average lateral length of 11,810 feet. Operated completions during the fourth quarter consisted of 26 Wolfcamp A wells, 26 Lower Spraberry wells, 24 Wolfcamp B wells, 19 Jo Mill wells, 15 Middle Spraberry wells, four Wolfcamp D wells, four Dean wells, three Upper Spraberry wells, three Barnett wells, two Second Bone Spring wells and two Third Bone Spring wells.

    For the year ended December 31, 2024, Diamondback drilled 342 gross wells in the Midland Basin and 30 gross wells in the Delaware Basin. The Company turned 391 operated wells to production in the Midland Basin and 19 operated wells to production in the Delaware Basin. The average lateral length for wells completed during the year ended December 31, 2024 was 11,719 feet, and consisted of 98 Lower Spraberry wells, 87 Wolfcamp A wells, 69 Wolfcamp B wells, 59 Jo Mill wells, 49 Middle Spraberry wells, 13 Wolfcamp D wells, 13 Dean wells, nine Upper Spraberry wells, six Third Bone Spring wells, four Barnett wells and three Second Bone Spring wells.

    FINANCIAL UPDATE

    Diamondback’s fourth quarter 2024 net income was $1.1 billion, or $3.67 per diluted share. Adjusted net income (as defined and reconciled below) for the fourth quarter was $1.1 billion, or $3.64 per diluted share. For the full year ended December 31, 2024, Diamondback’s net income was $3.3 billion, or $15.53 per diluted share. Adjusted net income for the full year was $3.6 billion, or $16.57 per diluted share.

    Fourth quarter 2024 net cash provided by operating activities was $2.3 billion. For the full year ended December 31, 2024, Diamondback’s net cash provided by operating activities was $6.4 billion.

    During the fourth quarter of 2024, Diamondback spent $834 million on operated and non-operated drilling and completions, $93 million on infrastructure and environmental and $6 million on midstream, for total cash capital expenditures of $933 million. For the full year ended 2024, Diamondback spent $2.6 billion on operated and non-operated drilling and completions, $221 million on infrastructure and environmental and $14 million on midstream, for total cash capital expenditures of $2.9 billion.

    Fourth quarter 2024 Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA (as defined and reconciled below) was $2.6 billion. Adjusted EBITDA net of non-controlling interest (as defined and reconciled below) for the fourth quarter was $2.5 billion. For the full year ended December 31, 2024, Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA was $7.7 billion. Adjusted EBITDA net of non-controlling interest for the full year was $7.3 billion.

    Diamondback’s fourth quarter 2024 Free Cash Flow (as defined and reconciled below) was $1.3 billion. Adjusted Free Cash Flow (as reconciled and defined below) for the fourth quarter was $1.4 billion. For the full year ended December 31, 2024, Diamondback’s Free Cash Flow was $3.6 billion, with $4.0 billion of Adjusted Free Cash Flow over the same period.

    Fourth quarter 2024 average unhedged realized prices were $69.48 per barrel of oil, $0.48 per Mcf of natural gas and $19.27 per barrel of natural gas liquids (“NGLs”), resulting in a total equivalent unhedged realized price of $42.71 per BOE.

    Diamondback’s cash operating costs for the fourth quarter of 2024 were $10.30 per BOE, including lease operating expenses (“LOE”) of $5.67 per BOE, cash general and administrative (“G&A”) expenses of $0.69 per BOE, production and ad valorem taxes of $2.77 per BOE and gathering, processing and transportation expenses of $1.17 per BOE.

    As of December 31, 2024, Diamondback had $134 million in standalone cash and no borrowings outstanding under its revolving credit facility, with approximately $2.5 billion available for future borrowings under the facility and approximately $2.6 billion of total liquidity. As of December 31, 2024, the Company had consolidated total debt of $13.2 billion and consolidated net debt (as defined and reconciled below) of $13.0 billion, up from consolidated total debt of $13.1 billion and consolidated net debt of $12.7 billion as of September 30, 2024.

    DIVIDEND DECLARATIONS

    Diamondback announced today that the Company’s Board of Directors declared a base cash dividend of $1.00 per common share for the fourth quarter of 2024 payable on March 13, 2025 to stockholders of record at the close of business on March 6, 2025.

    Future base and variable dividends remain subject to review and approval at the discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors.

    COMMON STOCK REPURCHASE PROGRAM

    During the fourth quarter of 2024, Diamondback repurchased ~2.3 million shares of common stock at an average share price of $172.91 for a total cost of approximately $402 million, excluding excise tax. To date, Diamondback has repurchased ~25.8 million shares of common stock at an average share price of $136.82 for a total cost of approximately $3.5 billion and has approximately $2.5 billion remaining on its current share buyback authorization. Subject to factors discussed below, Diamondback intends to continue to purchase common stock under the common stock repurchase program opportunistically with cash on hand, free cash flow from operations and proceeds from potential liquidity events such as the sale of assets. This repurchase program has no time limit and may be suspended from time to time, modified, extended or discontinued by the Board at any time. Purchases under the repurchase program may be made from time to time in privately negotiated transactions, or in open market transactions in compliance with Rule 10b-18 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and will be subject to market conditions, applicable regulatory and legal requirements and other factors. Any common stock purchased as part of this program will be retired.

    RESERVES

    Estimates of Diamondback’s proved reserves as of December 31, 2024 were prepared by Diamondback’s internal reservoir engineers and audited by Ryder Scott Company, L.P., an independent petroleum engineering firm. Reference prices of $75.48 per barrel of oil and $2.13 per Mmbtu of natural gas were used in accordance with applicable rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Realized prices with applicable differentials were $76.15 per barrel of oil, $0.54 per Mcf of natural gas and $22.02 per barrel of natural gas liquids.

    Proved reserves at year-end 2024 of 3,557 MMBOE represent a 63% increase over year-end 2023 reserves. Proved developed reserves increased by 59% to 2,385 MMBOE (67% of total proved reserves) as of December 31, 2024, reflecting the continued development of the Company’s horizontal well inventory. Proved undeveloped reserves (“PUD” or “PUDs”) increased to 1,173 MMBOE, a 72% increase over year-end 2023, and are comprised of 1,381 horizontal locations in which we have a working interest, of which 1,310 are in the Midland Basin. Crude oil represents 50% of Diamondback’s total proved reserves.

    Net proved reserve additions of 1,599 MMBOE resulted in a reserve replacement ratio of 730% (defined as the sum of extensions and discoveries, revisions, purchases and divestitures, divided by annual production). The organic reserve replacement ratio was 68% (defined as the sum of extensions and discoveries and revisions, divided by annual production).

    Net purchases of reserves were the primary contributor to the increase in reserves totaling 1,449 MMBOE followed by Extensions and discoveries of reserves totaling 279 MMBOE, with downward revisions of 129 MMBOE. PDP extensions were the result of 1,172 new wells in which the Company has an interest, and PUD extensions were the result of 445 new locations in which the Company has a working interest. Net purchases of reserves of 1,449 MMBOE were the net result of acquisitions of 1,569 MMBOE and divestitures of 121 MMBOE. Downward revisions of 129 MMBOE were primarily the result of negative revisions of 89 MMBOE associated with lower commodity prices, 49 MMBOE due to PUD downgrades related to changes in the corporate development plan and 17 MMBOE due to a decline in well performance. These were partially offset by positive performance revisions of 26 MMBOE related to ownership and acquisition variance revisions.

    The SEC PUD guidelines allow a company to book PUD reserves associated with projects that are to occur within the next five years. With its current development plan, the Company expects to continue its strong PUD conversion ratio in 2025 by converting an estimated 33% of its PUDs to a Proved Developed category, and develop approximately 78% of the consolidated 2024 year-end PUD reserves by the end of 2027.

      Oil (MBbls)   Gas (MMcf)   Liquids (MBbls)   MBOE
    As of December 31, 2023 1,143,944     2,997,422     534,247     2,177,761  
    Extensions and discoveries 168,375     310,421     58,696     278,808  
    Revisions of previous estimates (78,142 )   (158,468 )   (24,518 )   (129,071 )
    Purchase of reserves in place 697,702     2,391,264     473,236     1,569,482  
    Divestitures (47,505 )   (240,044 )   (33,080 )   (120,592 )
    Production (123,325 )   (275,680 )   (49,700 )   (218,972 )
    As of December 31, 2024 1,761,049     5,024,915     958,881     3,557,416  

    Diamondback’s exploration and development costs in 2024 were $3.2 billion. PD F&D costs were $10.51/BOE. PD F&D costs are defined as exploration and development costs, excluding midstream, divided by the sum of reserves associated with transfers from proved undeveloped reserves at year-end 2023 including any associated revisions in 2024 and extensions and discoveries placed on production during 2024. Drill bit F&D costs were $19.12/BOE including the effects of all revisions including pricing revisions. Drill bit F&D costs are defined as the exploration and development costs, excluding midstream, divided by the sum of extensions, discoveries and revisions.

      Year Ended December 31,
        2024       2023       2022  
      (In millions)
    Acquisition costs:          
    Proved properties $ 21,275     $ 1,314     $ 778  
    Unproved properties   15,568       1,701       1,536  
    Development costs   2,992       1,962       566  
    Exploration costs   194       768       1,698  
    Total $ 40,029     $ 5,745     $ 4,578  


    FULL YEAR 2025 GUIDANCE

    Below is Diamondback’s guidance for the full year 2025, which includes first quarter production, cash tax and capital guidance. This guidance gives effect to the estimated contribution related to the pending Double Eagle acquisition, which is expected to close on April 1, 2025, subject to the satisfaction of customary closing conditions and regulatory approval.

      2025 Guidance 2025 Guidance
      Diamondback Energy, Inc. Viper Energy, Inc.
         
    2025 Net production – MBOE/d 883 – 909  
    2025 Oil production – MBO/d 485 – 498  
    Q1 2025 Oil production – MBO/d (total – MBOE/d) 470 – 475 (860 – 875) 30.0 – 31.0 (54.0 – 56.0)
         
    Unit costs ($/BOE)    
    Lease operating expenses, including workovers $5.90 – $6.30  
    G&A    
    Cash G&A $0.60 – $0.75  
    Non-cash equity-based compensation $0.25 – $0.35  
    DD&A $14.00 – $15.00  
    Interest expense (net of interest income) $0.25 – $0.50  
    Gathering, processing and transportation $1.20 – $1.40  
         
    Production and ad valorem taxes (% of revenue) ~7%  
    Corporate tax rate (% of pre-tax income) 23%  
    Cash tax rate (% of pre-tax income) 17% – 20%  
    Q1 2025 Cash taxes ($ – million) $280 – $340  
         
    Capital Budget ($ – million)    
    Operated drilling and completion $3,130 – $3,440  
    Capital workovers, non-operated properties and science $280 – $320  
    Infrastructure, environmental and midstream(1) $390 – $440  
    2025 Total capital expenditures $3,800 – $4,200  
    Q1 2025 Capital expenditures $900 – $1,000  
         
    Gross horizontal wells drilled (net) 446 – 471 (406 – 428)  
    Gross horizontal wells completed (net) 557 – 592 (526 – 560)  
    Average lateral length (Ft.) ~11,500′  
    FY 2025 Midland Basin well costs per lateral foot $555 – $605  
    FY 2025 Delaware Basin well costs per lateral foot $860 – $910  
    Midland Basin completed net lateral feet (%) ~95%  
    Delaware Basin completed net lateral feet (%) ~5%  

    (1) Includes approximately $60 million in estimated midstream capital expenditures for the full year 2025.

    CONFERENCE CALL

    Diamondback will host a conference call and webcast for investors and analysts to discuss its results for the fourth quarter of 2024 on Tuesday, February 25, 2025 at 8:00 a.m. CT. Access to the webcast, and replay which will be available following the call, may be found here. The live webcast of the earnings conference call will also be available via Diamondback’s website at www.diamondbackenergy.com under the “Investor Relations” section of the site.

    About Diamondback Energy, Inc.

    Diamondback is an independent oil and natural gas company headquartered in Midland, Texas focused on the acquisition, development, exploration and exploitation of unconventional, onshore oil and natural gas reserves primarily in the Permian Basin in West Texas. For more information, please visit www.diamondbackenergy.com.

    Forward-Looking Statements

    This news release contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act, which involve risks, uncertainties, and assumptions. All statements, other than statements of historical fact, including statements regarding Diamondback’s: future performance; business strategy; future operations (including drilling plans and capital plans); estimates and projections of revenues, losses, costs, expenses, returns, cash flow, and financial position; reserve estimates and its ability to replace or increase reserves; anticipated benefits or other effects of strategic transactions (including the recently completed Endeavor merger, the pending Double Eagle acquisition and other acquisitions or divestitures); and plans and objectives of management (including plans for future cash flow from operations and for executing environmental strategies) are forward-looking statements. When used in this news release, the words “aim,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “continue,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “forecast,” “future,” “guidance,” “intend,” “may,” “model,” “outlook,” “plan,” “positioned,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “seek,” “should,” “target,” “will,” “would,” and similar expressions (including the negative of such terms) as they relate to Diamondback are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain such identifying words. Although Diamondback believes that the expectations and assumptions reflected in its forward-looking statements are reasonable as and when made, they involve risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict and, in many cases, beyond Diamondback’s control. Accordingly, forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and Diamondback’s actual outcomes could differ materially from what Diamondback has expressed in its forward-looking statements.

    Factors that could cause the outcomes to differ materially include (but are not limited to) the following: changes in supply and demand levels for oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids, and the resulting impact on the price for those commodities; the impact of public health crises, including epidemic or pandemic diseases and any related company or government policies or actions; actions taken by the members of OPEC and Russia affecting the production and pricing of oil, as well as other domestic and global political, economic, or diplomatic developments, including any impact of the ongoing war in Ukraine and the Israel-Hamas war on the global energy markets and geopolitical stability; instability in the financial markets; inflationary pressures; higher interest rates and their impact on the cost of capital; regional supply and demand factors, including delays, curtailment delays or interruptions of production, or governmental orders, rules or regulations that impose production limits; federal and state legislative and regulatory initiatives relating to hydraulic fracturing, including the effect of existing and future laws and governmental regulations; physical and transition risks relating to climate change; those risks described in Item 1A of Diamondback’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on February 22, 2024, and those risks disclosed in its subsequent filings on Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K, which can be obtained free of charge on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov and Diamondback’s website at www.diamondbackenergy.com/investors.

    In light of these factors, the events anticipated by Diamondback’s forward-looking statements may not occur at the time anticipated or at all. Moreover, Diamondback operates in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment and new risks emerge from time to time. Diamondback cannot predict all risks, nor can it assess the impact of all factors on its business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated by any forward-looking statements it may make. Accordingly, you should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this letter or, if earlier, as of the date they were made. Diamondback does not intend to, and disclaims any obligation to, update or revise any forward-looking statements unless required by applicable law.

     
    Diamondback Energy, Inc.
    Consolidated Balance Sheets
    (unaudited, in millions, except share amounts)
           
      December 31,   December 31,
        2024       2023  
    Assets      
    Current assets:      
    Cash and cash equivalents ($27 million and $26 million related to Viper) $ 161     $ 582  
    Restricted cash   3       3  
    Accounts receivable:      
    Joint interest and other, net   198       192  
    Oil and natural gas sales, net ($149 million and $109 million related to Viper)   1,387       654  
    Inventories   116       63  
    Derivative instruments   168       17  
    Prepaid expenses and other current assets   77       110  
    Total current assets   2,110       1,621  
    Property and equipment:      
    Oil and natural gas properties, full cost method of accounting ($22,666 million and $8,659 million excluded from amortization at December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, respectively) ($5,713 million and $4,629 million related to Viper and $2,180 million and $1,769 million excluded from amortization related to Viper)   82,240       42,430  
    Other property, equipment and land   1,440       673  
    Accumulated depletion, depreciation, amortization and impairment ($1,081 million and $866 million related to Viper)   (19,208 )     (16,429 )
    Property and equipment, net   64,472       26,674  
    Funds held in escrow   1        
    Equity method investments   375       529  
    Derivative instruments   2       1  
    Deferred income taxes, net ($185 million and $57 million related to Viper)   173       45  
    Other assets   159       131  
    Total assets $ 67,292     $ 29,001  
    Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity      
    Current liabilities:      
    Accounts payable – trade $ 253     $ 261  
    Accrued capital expenditures   690       493  
    Current maturities of debt   900        
    Other accrued liabilities   1,020       475  
    Revenues and royalties payable   1,491       764  
    Derivative instruments   43       86  
    Income taxes payable   414       29  
    Total current liabilities   4,811       2,108  
    Long-term debt ($1,083 million and $1,083 million related to Viper)   12,075       6,641  
    Derivative instruments   106       122  
    Asset retirement obligations   573       239  
    Deferred income taxes   9,826       2,449  
    Other long-term liabilities   39       12  
    Total liabilities   27,430       11,571  
    Stockholders’ equity:      
    Common stock, $0.01 par value; 800,000,000 shares authorized; 290,984,373 and 178,723,871 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, respectively   3       2  
    Additional paid-in capital   33,501       14,142  
    Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)   4,238       2,489  
    Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)   (6 )     (8 )
    Total Diamondback Energy, Inc. stockholders’ equity   37,736       16,625  
    Non-controlling interest   2,126       805  
    Total equity   39,862       17,430  
    Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $ 67,292     $ 29,001  
     
    Diamondback Energy, Inc.
    Consolidated Statements of Operations
    (unaudited, $ in millions except per share data, shares in thousands)
                   
      Three Months Ended December 31,   Year Ended December 31,
        2024       2023       2024       2023  
    Revenues:              
    Oil, natural gas and natural gas liquid sales $ 3,471     $ 2,165     $ 10,100     $ 8,228  
    Sales of purchased oil   225       52       923       111  
    Other operating income   15       11       43       73  
    Total revenues   3,711       2,228       11,066       8,412  
    Costs and expenses:              
    Lease operating expenses   461       254       1,286       872  
    Production and ad valorem taxes   225       104       638       525  
    Gathering, processing and transportation   95       78       356       287  
    Purchased oil expense   225       52       921       111  
    Depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion   1,156       469       2,850       1,746  
    General and administrative expenses   72       39       213       150  
    Merger and integration expense   30             303       11  
    Other operating expenses   35       27       103       140  
    Total costs and expenses   2,299       1,023       6,670       3,842  
    Income (loss) from operations   1,412       1,205       4,396       4,570  
    Other income (expense):              
    Interest expense, net   (34 )     (29 )     (135 )     (159 )
    Other income (expense), net   (7 )     (9 )     80       52  
    Gain (loss) on derivative instruments, net   36       99       137       (259 )
    Gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt               2       (4 )
    Income (loss) from equity investments, net   (2 )     9       21       48  
    Total other income (expense), net   (7 )     70       105       (322 )
    Income (loss) before income taxes   1,405       1,275       4,501       4,248  
    Provision for (benefit from) income taxes   115       264       800       912  
    Net income (loss)   1,290       1,011       3,701       3,336  
    Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interest   216       51       363       193  
    Net income (loss) attributable to Diamondback Energy, Inc. $ 1,074     $ 960     $ 3,338     $ 3,143  
                   
    Earnings (loss) per common share:              
    Basic $ 3.67     $ 5.34     $ 15.53     $ 17.34  
    Diluted $ 3.67     $ 5.34     $ 15.53     $ 17.34  
    Weighted average common shares outstanding:              
    Basic   291,851       178,811       213,545       179,999  
    Diluted   291,851       178,811       213,545       179,999  
     
    Diamondback Energy, Inc.
    Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
    (unaudited, in millions)
                   
      Three Months Ended December 31,   Year Ended December 31,
        2024       2023       2024       2023  
    Cash flows from operating activities:              
    Net income (loss) $ 1,290     $ 1,011     $ 3,701     $ 3,336  
    Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:              
    Provision for (benefit from) deferred income taxes   (165 )     193       15       378  
    Depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion   1,156       469       2,850       1,746  
    (Gain) loss on extinguishment of debt               (2 )     4  
    (Gain) loss on derivative instruments, net   (36 )     (99 )     (137 )     259  
    Cash received (paid) on settlement of derivative instruments   (15 )     (48 )     (51 )     (110 )
    (Income) loss from equity investment, net   2       (9 )     (21 )     (48 )
    Equity-based compensation expense   16       14       65       54  
    Other   12       28       89       5  
    Changes in operating assets and liabilities:              
    Accounts receivable   (103 )     147       (42 )     (71 )
    Income tax receivable   (3 )     16       9       283  
    Prepaid expenses and other current assets   (24 )     (94 )     54       (89 )
    Accounts payable and accrued liabilities   114       11       (376 )     57  
    Income taxes payable   138       (9 )     87       (5 )
    Revenues and royalties payable   59       (16 )     168       123  
    Other   (100 )     10       4       (2 )
    Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities   2,341       1,624       6,413       5,920  
    Cash flows from investing activities:              
    Drilling, completions, infrastructure and midstream additions to oil and natural gas properties   (933 )     (649 )     (2,867 )     (2,701 )
    Property acquisitions   (926 )     (820 )     (8,920 )     (2,013 )
    Proceeds from sale of assets   8       7       467       1,407  
    Other   (4 )     (2 )     99       (16 )
    Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities   (1,855 )     (1,464 )     (11,221 )     (3,323 )
    Cash flows from financing activities:              
    Proceeds under term loan agreement               1,000        
    Repayments under term loan agreement   (100 )           (100 )      
    Proceeds from borrowings under credit facilities   2,190       313       3,375       4,779  
    Repayments under credit facilities   (2,044 )     (300 )     (3,377 )     (4,668 )
    Proceeds from senior notes         400       5,500       400  
    Repayment of senior notes               (25 )     (134 )
    Repurchased shares under buyback program   (402 )     (131 )     (959 )     (840 )
    Repurchased shares/units under Viper’s buyback program         (28 )           (95 )
    Proceeds from partial sale of investment in Viper Energy, Inc.               451        
    Net proceeds from Viper’s issuance of common stock               476        
    Dividends paid to stockholders   (262 )     (603 )     (1,578 )     (1,444 )
    Dividends/distributions to non-controlling interest   (70 )     (45 )     (227 )     (129 )
    Other   (7 )     (11 )     (149 )     (45 )
    Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities   (695 )     (405 )     4,387       (2,176 )
    Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents   (209 )     (245 )     (421 )     421  
    Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period   373       830       585       164  
    Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period $ 164     $ 585     $ 164     $ 585  
     
    Diamondback Energy, Inc.
    Selected Operating Data
    (unaudited)
                   
      Three Months Ended December 31,   Year Ended December 31,
        2024       2023       2024       2023  
    Production Data:              
    Oil (MBbls)   43,785       25,124       123,325       96,176  
    Natural gas (MMcf)   107,249       50,497       275,680       198,117  
    Natural gas liquids (MBbls)   19,615       9,016       49,700       34,217  
    Combined volumes (MBOE)(1)   81,275       42,556       218,972       163,413  
                   
    Daily oil volumes (BO/d)   475,924       273,087       336,954       263,496  
    Daily combined volumes (BOE/d)   883,424       462,565       598,284       447,707  
                   
    Average Prices:              
    Oil ($ per Bbl) $ 69.48     $ 76.42     $ 73.52     $ 75.68  
    Natural gas ($ per Mcf) $ 0.48     $ 1.29     $ 0.32     $ 1.32  
    Natural gas liquids ($ per Bbl) $ 19.27     $ 19.96     $ 18.99     $ 20.08  
    Combined ($ per BOE) $ 42.71     $ 50.87     $ 46.12     $ 50.35  
                   
    Oil, hedged ($ per Bbl)(2) $ 68.72     $ 75.59     $ 72.68     $ 74.72  
    Natural gas, hedged ($ per Mcf)(2) $ 0.82     $ 1.31     $ 0.91     $ 1.48  
    Natural gas liquids, hedged ($ per Bbl)(2) $ 19.27     $ 19.96     $ 18.99     $ 20.08  
    Average price, hedged ($ per BOE)(2) $ 42.76     $ 50.40     $ 46.38     $ 49.98  
                   
    Average Costs per BOE:              
    Lease operating expenses $ 5.67     $ 5.97     $ 5.87     $ 5.34  
    Production and ad valorem taxes   2.77       2.44       2.91       3.21  
    Gathering, processing and transportation expense   1.17       1.83       1.63       1.76  
    General and administrative – cash component   0.69       0.59       0.68       0.59  
    Total operating expense – cash $ 10.30     $ 10.83     $ 11.09     $ 10.90  
                   
    General and administrative – non-cash component $ 0.20     $ 0.33     $ 0.30     $ 0.33  
    Depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion $ 14.22     $ 11.02     $ 13.02     $ 10.68  
    Interest expense, net $ 0.42     $ 0.68     $ 0.62     $ 0.97  

    (1)   Bbl equivalents are calculated using a conversion rate of six Mcf per one Bbl.
    (2)   Hedged prices reflect the effect of our commodity derivative transactions on our average sales prices and include gains and losses on cash settlements for matured commodity derivatives, which we do not designate for hedge accounting. Hedged prices exclude gains or losses resulting from the early settlement of commodity derivative contracts.


    NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

    ADJUSTED EBITDA

    Adjusted EBITDA is a supplemental non-GAAP financial measure that is used by management and external users of our financial statements, such as industry analysts, investors, lenders and rating agencies. The Company defines Adjusted EBITDA as net income (loss) attributable to Diamondback Energy, Inc., plus net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interest (“net income (loss)”) before non-cash (gain) loss on derivative instruments, net, interest expense, net, depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion, depreciation and interest expense related to equity method investments, (gain) loss on extinguishment of debt, if any, non-cash equity-based compensation expense, capitalized equity-based compensation expense, merger and integration expenses, other non-cash transactions and provision for (benefit from) income taxes, if any. Adjusted EBITDA is not a measure of net income as determined by United States generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). Management believes Adjusted EBITDA is useful because the measure allows it to more effectively evaluate the Company’s operating performance and compare the results of its operations from period to period without regard to its financing methods or capital structure. The Company adds the items listed above to net income (loss) to determine Adjusted EBITDA because these amounts can vary substantially from company to company within its industry depending upon accounting methods and book values of assets, capital structures and the method by which the assets were acquired. Further, the Company excludes the effects of significant transactions that may affect earnings but are unpredictable in nature, timing and amount, although they may recur in different reporting periods. Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered as an alternative to, or more meaningful than, net income as determined in accordance with GAAP or as an indicator of the Company’s operating performance or liquidity. Certain items excluded from Adjusted EBITDA are significant components in understanding and assessing a company’s financial performance, such as a company’s cost of capital and tax structure, as well as the historic costs of depreciable assets. The Company’s computation of Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies or to such measure in our credit facility or any of our other contracts.

    The following tables present a reconciliation of the GAAP financial measure of net income (loss) attributable to Diamondback Energy, Inc. to the non-GAAP financial measure of Adjusted EBITDA:

    Diamondback Energy, Inc.
    Reconciliation of Net Income (Loss) to Adjusted EBITDA
    (unaudited, in millions)
                   
      Three Months Ended December 31,   Year Ended December 31,
        2024       2023       2024       2023  
    Net income (loss) attributable to Diamondback Energy, Inc. $ 1,074     $ 960     $ 3,338     $ 3,143  
    Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interest   216       51       363       193  
    Net income (loss)   1,290       1,011       3,701       3,336  
    Non-cash (gain) loss on derivative instruments, net   (51 )     (147 )     (188 )     149  
    Interest expense, net   34       29       135       159  
    Depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion   1,156       469       2,850       1,746  
    Depreciation and interest expense related to equity method investments   30       18       91       70  
    (Gain) loss on extinguishment of debt               (2 )     4  
    Non-cash equity-based compensation expense   24       21       95       80  
    Capitalized equity-based compensation expense   (8 )     (7 )     (30 )     (26 )
    Merger and integration expenses   30             303       11  
    Other non-cash transactions   2       12       (62 )     (52 )
    Provision for (benefit from) income taxes   115       264       800       912  
    Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA   2,622       1,670       7,693       6,389  
    Less: Adjustment for non-controlling interest   118       82       411       290  
    Adjusted EBITDA attributable to Diamondback Energy, Inc. $ 2,504     $ 1,588     $ 7,282     $ 6,099  

    ADJUSTED NET INCOME

    Adjusted net income is a non-GAAP financial measure equal to net income (loss) attributable to Diamondback Energy, Inc. plus net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interest (“net income (loss)”) adjusted for non-cash (gain) loss on derivative instruments, net, (gain) loss on extinguishment of debt, if any, merger and integration expense, other non-cash transactions and related income tax adjustments, if any. The Company’s computation of adjusted net income may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies or to such measure in our credit facility or any of our other contracts. Management believes adjusted net income helps investors in the oil and natural gas industry to measure and compare the Company’s performance to other oil and natural gas companies by excluding from the calculation items that can vary significantly from company to company depending upon accounting methods, the book value of assets and other non-operational factors. Further, in order to allow investors to compare the Company’s performance across periods, the Company excludes the effects of significant transactions that may affect earnings but are unpredictable in nature, timing and amount, although they may recur in different reporting periods.

    The following table presents a reconciliation of the GAAP financial measure of net income (loss) attributable to Diamondback Energy, Inc. to the non-GAAP measure of adjusted net income:

    Diamondback Energy, Inc.
    Adjusted Net Income
    (unaudited, $ in millions except per share data, shares in thousands)
               
      Three Months Ended
    December 31, 2024
      Year Ended
    December 31, 2024
      Amounts   Amounts Per
    Diluted
    Share
      Amounts   Amounts Per
    Diluted
    Share
    Net income (loss) attributable to Diamondback Energy, Inc.(1) $ 1,074     $ 3.67     $ 3,338     $ 15.53  
    Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interest   216       0.74       363       1.70  
    Net income (loss)(1)   1,290       4.41       3,701       17.23  
    Non-cash (gain) loss on derivative instruments, net   (51 )     (0.17 )     (188 )     (0.88 )
    (Gain) loss on extinguishment of debt               (2 )     (0.01 )
    Merger and integration expense   30       0.10       303       1.42  
    Other non-cash transactions   2             (62 )     (0.29 )
    Adjusted net income excluding above items(1)   1,271       4.34       3,752       17.47  
    Income tax adjustment for above items   2       0.01       (9 )     (0.04 )
    Adjusted net income(1)   1,273       4.35       3,743       17.43  
    Less: Adjusted net income attributable to non-controlling interest   206       0.71       183       0.86  
    Adjusted net income attributable to Diamondback Energy, Inc.(1) $ 1,067     $ 3.64     $ 3,560     $ 16.57  
                   
    Weighted average common shares outstanding:              
    Basic     291,851           213,545  
    Diluted     291,851           213,545  

    (1) The Company’s earnings (loss) per diluted share amount has been computed using the two-class method in accordance with GAAP. The two-class method is an earnings allocation which reflects the respective ownership among holders of common stock and participating securities. Diluted earnings per share using the two-class method is calculated as (i) net income attributable to Diamondback Energy, Inc, (ii) less the reallocation of $4 million and $21 million in earnings attributable to participating securities for the three months ended December 31, 2024 and the year ended December 31, 2024, respectively, (iii) divided by diluted weighted average common shares outstanding for the respective periods.

    OPERATING CASH FLOW BEFORE WORKING CAPITAL CHANGES AND FREE CASH FLOW

    Operating cash flow before working capital changes, which is a non-GAAP financial measure, represents net cash provided by operating activities as determined under GAAP without regard to changes in operating assets and liabilities. The Company believes operating cash flow before working capital changes is a useful measure of an oil and natural gas company’s ability to generate cash used to fund exploration, development and acquisition activities and service debt or pay dividends. The Company also uses this measure because changes in operating assets and liabilities relate to the timing of cash receipts and disbursements that the Company may not control and may not relate to the period in which the operating activities occurred. This allows the Company to compare its operating performance with that of other companies without regard to financing methods and capital structure.

    Free Cash Flow, which is a non-GAAP financial measure, is cash flow from operating activities before changes in working capital in excess of cash capital expenditures. The Company believes that Free Cash Flow is useful to investors as it provides measures to compare both cash flow from operating activities and additions to oil and natural gas properties across periods on a consistent basis as adjusted for non-recurring tax impacts from divestitures, merger and integration expenses, the early termination of derivative contracts and settlements of treasury locks. These measures should not be considered as an alternative to, or more meaningful than, net cash provided by operating activities as an indicator of operating performance. The Company’s computation of Free Cash Flow may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies. The Company uses Free Cash Flow to reduce debt, as well as return capital to stockholders as determined by the Board of Directors.

    The following tables present a reconciliation of the GAAP financial measure of net cash provided by operating activities to the non-GAAP measure of operating cash flow before working capital changes and to the non-GAAP measure of Free Cash Flow:

    Diamondback Energy, Inc.
    Operating Cash Flow Before Working Capital Changes and Free Cash Flow
    (unaudited, in millions)
                   
      Three Months Ended December 31,   Year Ended December 31,
        2024       2023       2024       2023  
    Net cash provided by operating activities $ 2,341     $ 1,624     $ 6,413     $ 5,920  
    Less: Changes in cash due to changes in operating assets and liabilities:              
    Accounts receivable   (103 )     147       (42 )     (71 )
    Income tax receivable   (3 )     16       9       283  
    Prepaid expenses and other current assets   (24 )     (94 )     54       (89 )
    Accounts payable and accrued liabilities   114       11       (376 )     57  
    Income taxes payable   138       (9 )     87       (5 )
    Revenues and royalties payable   59       (16 )     168       123  
    Other   (100 )     10       4       (2 )
    Total working capital changes   81       65       (96 )     296  
    Operating cash flow before working capital changes   2,260       1,559       6,509       5,624  
    Drilling, completions, infrastructure and midstream additions to oil and natural gas properties   (933 )     (649 )     (2,867 )     (2,701 )
    Total Cash CAPEX   (933 )     (649 )     (2,867 )     (2,701 )
    Free Cash Flow   1,327       910       3,642       2,923  
    Tax impact from divestitures(1)                     64  
    Merger and integration expenses   30             303        
    Early termination of derivatives               37        
    Treasury locks               25        
    Adjusted Free Cash Flow $ 1,357     $ 910     $ 4,007     $ 2,987  

    (1) Includes the tax impact for the disposal of certain Midland Basin water assets and Delaware Basin oil gathering assets.

    NET DEBT

    The Company defines the non-GAAP measure of net debt as total debt (excluding debt issuance costs, discounts, premiums and unamortized basis adjustments) less cash and cash equivalents. Net debt should not be considered an alternative to, or more meaningful than, total debt, the most directly comparable GAAP measure. Management uses net debt to determine the Company’s outstanding debt obligations that would not be readily satisfied by its cash and cash equivalents on hand. The Company believes this metric is useful to analysts and investors in determining the Company’s leverage position because the Company has the ability to, and may decide to, use a portion of its cash and cash equivalents to reduce debt.

    Diamondback Energy, Inc.
    Net Debt
    (unaudited, in millions)
                           
      December 31,
    2024
      Net Q4
    Principal
    Borrowings/
    (Repayments)
      September 30,
    2024
      June 30,
    2024
      March 31,
    2024
      December 31,
    2023
      (in millions)
    Diamondback Energy, Inc.(1) $ 12,069     $ (215 )   $ 12,284     $ 11,169     $ 5,669     $ 5,697  
    Viper Energy, Inc.(1)   1,091       261       830       1,007       1,103       1,093  
    Total debt   13,160     $ 46       13,114       12,176       6,772       6,790  
    Cash and cash equivalents   (161 )         (370 )     (6,908 )     (896 )     (582 )
    Net debt $ 12,999         $ 12,744     $ 5,268     $ 5,876     $ 6,208  

    (1)  Excludes debt issuance costs, discounts, premiums and unamortized basis adjustments.

    DERIVATIVES

    As of February 21, 2025, the Company had the following outstanding consolidated derivative contracts, including derivative contracts at Viper Energy, Inc. The Company’s derivative contracts are based upon reported settlement prices on commodity exchanges, with crude oil derivative settlements based on New York Mercantile Exchange West Texas Intermediate pricing and Crude Oil Brent pricing and with natural gas derivative settlements based on the New York Mercantile Exchange Henry Hub pricing. When aggregating multiple contracts, the weighted average contract price is disclosed.

      Crude Oil (Bbls/day, $/Bbl)
      Q1 2025     Q2 2025     Q3 2025     Q4 2025     FY2026  
    Long Puts – Crude Brent Oil 52,000     48,000     27,000     12,000      
    Long Put Price ($/Bbl) $60.00     $58.44     $56.85     $55.00      
    Deferred Premium ($/Bbl) $-1.48     $-1.50     $-1.54     $-1.56      
    Long Puts – WTI (Magellan East Houston) 83,000     86,000     72,000     35,000      
    Long Put Price ($/Bbl) $55.84     $55.12     $55.00     $55.00      
    Deferred Premium ($/Bbl) $-1.59     $-1.58     -1.60     $-1.62      
    Long Puts – WTI (Cushing) 142,000     137,000     101,000     41,000      
    Long Put Price ($/Bbl) $56.58     $55.58     $55.00     $55.00      
    Deferred Premium ($/Bbl) $-1.59     $-1.58     $-1.58     $-1.61      
    Costless Collars – WTI (Cushing) 13,000                  
    Long Put Price ($/Bbl) $60.00                  
    Short Call Price ($/Bbl) $89.55                  
    Basis Swaps – WTI (Midland) 64,000     66,000     66,000     66,000      
    $1.09     $1.05     $1.05     $1.05      
    Roll Swaps – WTI 16,389     25,000     25,000     25,000      
    $0.93     $0.93     $0.93     $0.93      
      Natural Gas (Mmbtu/day, $/Mmbtu)
      Q1 2025   Q2 2025   Q3 2025   Q4 2025   FY 2026   FY 2027  
    Costless Collars – Henry Hub 750,000     690,000     690,000     690,000     500,000      
    Long Put Price ($/Mmbtu) $2.52     $2.49     $2.49     $2.49     $2.64      
    Ceiling Price ($/Mmbtu) $5.26     $5.28     $5.28     $5.28     $6.31      
    Natural Gas Basis Swaps – Waha Hub 670,000     610,000     610,000     610,000     230,000     200,000  
    $-0.82     $-0.84     $-0.84     $-0.84     $-1.41     $-1.42  

    Investor Contact:
    Adam Lawlis
    +1 432.221.7467
    alawlis@diamondbackenergy.com

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: EverQuote Announces Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2024 Financial Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    • Fourth Quarter Revenue Growth of 165% Year-Over-Year to $147.5 million
    • Fourth Quarter Variable Marketing Dollars Increases Over 110% Year-Over-Year to $44.0 million
    • Delivers Fourth Quarter Net Income of $12.3 million and Adjusted EBITDA of $18.9 million
    • Full Year Revenue Grows 74% and Variable Marketing Dollars Increases 55%, Year-Over-Year
    • Full Year Net Income Increases to $32.2 million and Generates Operating Cash Flow of $66.6 million

    CAMBRIDGE, Mass., Feb. 24, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — EverQuote, Inc. (Nasdaq: EVER), a leading online insurance marketplace, today announced financial results for the fourth quarter and full year ended December 31, 2024.

    “I am proud of our remarkable team and our financial accomplishments in 2024. We grew revenue by 74% year-over-year to cross the $500 million mark for the first time, increased Adjusted EBITDA to almost $60 million, and finished the year with over $100 million of cash on the balance sheet, and no debt,” said Jayme Mendal, CEO of EverQuote. “Over the last year, we have refocused and clarified our vision to become the leading growth partner for P&C insurance providers by efficiently delivering better performing referrals, bigger traffic scale and a broader suite of products and services. We are emerging from the auto insurance downturn with record performance, and expect to carry forward our positive momentum and profitable growth into 2025 and beyond.”

    “Our strong momentum continued through the fourth quarter, as we again exceeded guidance across all three of our primary financial metrics: total revenue, Variable Marketing Dollars or VMD, and Adjusted EBITDA. We produced a record-level of revenue and net income, as well as a record-level of Adjusted EBITDA and operating cash flow for the full year 2024,” said Joseph Sanborn, CFO of EverQuote. “As we progress through 2025, we plan to make continued strategic investments to accelerate the advancement of our technology platform to enable faster development of product enhancements and new offerings for our customers. We are excited about our ability to continue to leverage our traffic expertise, data assets and technology to support our insurance provider customers in successfully expanding their business; and in turn enable EverQuote to further scale and drive growing profitability.”

    Fourth Quarter 2024 Highlights:
    (Unless otherwise noted, all comparisons are relative to the fourth quarter of 2023).

    • Total revenue of $147.5 million, an increase of 165%.
    • Automotive insurance vertical revenue of $135.9 million, an increase of over 200%.
    • Home and renters insurance vertical revenue of $11.3 million, an increase of 15%.
    • VMD more than doubled to $44.0 million, compared to $20.7 million.
    • GAAP net income of $12.3 million, compared to a GAAP net loss of ($6.3) million.
    • Adjusted EBITDA of $18.9 million, compared to ($0.9) million.
    • Operating cash flow of $20.1 million, compared to ($0.8) million.
    • Ended the quarter with $102.1 million in cash and cash equivalents, an increase of 23% from $82.8 million at the end of the third quarter of 2024.

    Full Year 2024 Highlights:
    (Unless otherwise noted, all comparisons are relative to full year 2023 results).

    • Total revenue of $500.2 million, an increase of 74%.
    • Automotive insurance vertical revenue of $446.1 million, an increase of 96%.
    • Home and renters insurance vertical revenue of $52.0 million, an increase of 27%.
    • VMD increased 55% to $155.2 million, compared to $100.3 million.
    • GAAP net income of $32.2 million, compared to a GAAP net loss of ($51.3) million. The net loss for 2023 includes $23.6 million of restructuring and other charges related to the sale of our health insurance vertical assets and workforce reduction.
    • Adjusted EBITDA of $58.2 million, compared to $0.5 million.
    • Operating cash flow of $66.6 million, compared to ($2.8) million.

    First Quarter 2025 Outlook:

    • Revenue of $155.0 – $160.0 million, representing 73% year-over-year growth at the midpoint.
    • Variable Marketing Dollars of $44.0 – $46.0 million, representing 46% year-over-year growth at the midpoint.
    • Adjusted EBITDA of $19.0 – $21.0 million, representing 163% year-over-year growth at the midpoint.

    With respect to the Company’s expectations under “First Quarter 2025 Outlook” above, the Company has not reconciled the non-GAAP measure Adjusted EBITDA to the GAAP measure net income (loss) in this press release because the Company does not provide guidance for stock-based compensation expense, depreciation and amortization expense, restructuring and other charges, acquisition-related costs, interest income, and income taxes on a consistent basis as the Company is unable to quantify these amounts without unreasonable efforts, which would be required to include a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to GAAP net income (loss). In addition, the Company believes such a reconciliation would imply a degree of precision that could be confusing or misleading to investors.

    Conference Call and Webcast Information

    EverQuote will host a conference call and live webcast to discuss its fourth quarter and full year 2024 financial results at 4:30 p.m. Eastern Time today, February 24, 2025. To access the conference call, dial Toll Free: +1 (800) 715-9871 for the US, or +1 (646) 307-1963 for international callers, and provide conference ID 4210704. The live webcast and replay will be available on the Investors section of the Company’s website at https://investors.everquote.com.

    Safe Harbor Statement

    This press release contains forward-looking statements, within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All statements other than statements of historical fact contained in this press release, including statements regarding our future results of operations and financial position, business strategy and plans, and objectives of management for future operations, are forward-looking statements. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other important factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance, or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms such as “may,” “should,” “expects,” “might,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “could,” “intends,” “target,” “projects,” “contemplates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential,” “seek,” “would” or “continue,” or the negative of these terms or other similar expressions. The forward-looking statements in this press release are only predictions. We have based these forward-looking statements largely on our current expectations and projections about future events and financial trends that we believe may affect our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee that the future results, levels of activity, performance or events and circumstances reflected in the forward-looking statements will be achieved or occur. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this press release and are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties and assumptions described in our annual report on Form 10-K, our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and our current reports on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) from time to time. Additional information will also be set forth in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, which will be filed with the SEC. Because forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, some of which cannot be predicted or quantified, you should not rely on these forward-looking statements as predictions of future events. The events and circumstances reflected in our forward-looking statements may not be achieved or occur and actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. While we may elect to update these forward-looking statements at some point in the future, whether as a result of any new information, future events, or otherwise, we have no current intention of doing so except to the extent required by applicable law. Some of the key factors that could cause actual results to differ include: (1) our dependence on revenue from the property and casualty insurance industries, and specifically automotive insurance, and exposure to risks related to those industries; (2) our dependence on our relationships with insurance providers with no long-term minimum financial commitments; (3) our reliance on a small number of insurance providers for a significant portion of our revenue; (4) our dependence on third-party media sources for a significant portion of visitors to our websites and marketplace; (5) our ability to attract consumers searching for insurance to our websites and marketplace through Internet search engines, display advertising, social media, content-based online advertising and other online sources; (6) any limitations restricting our ability to market to users or collect and use data derived from user activities; (7) risks related to cybersecurity incidents or other network disruptions; (8) risks related to the use of artificial intelligence; (9) our ability to develop new and enhanced products and services to attract and retain consumers and insurance providers, and to successfully monetize them; (10) the impact of competition in our industry and innovation by our competitors; (11) our ability to hire and retain necessary qualified employees to expand our operations; (12) our ability to stay abreast of and comply with new or modified laws and regulations that currently apply or become applicable to our business, including with respect to the insurance industry, telemarketing restrictions and data privacy requirements; (13) our ability to protect our intellectual property rights and maintain and build our brand; (14) our future financial performance, including our expectations regarding our revenue, cost of revenue, variable marketing dollars, operating expenses, cash flows and ability to achieve, and maintain, future profitability; (15) our ability to properly collect, process, store, share, disclose and use consumer information and other data; and (16) the future trading prices of our Class A common stock.

    About EverQuote

    EverQuote operates a leading online marketplace for insurance shopping, connecting consumers with insurance provider customers, which includes both carriers and agents. Our vision is to be the leading growth partner for property and casualty, or P&C, insurance providers. Our results-driven marketplace, powered by our proprietary data and technology platform, is improving the way insurance providers attract and connect with consumers shopping for insurance.

    For more information, visit https://investors.everquote.com and follow on LinkedIn.

    Investor Relations Contact

    Brinlea Johnson
    The Blueshirt Group
    (415) 489-2193

     
    EVERQUOTE, INC.
    STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
     
        Three Months Ended
    December 31,
        Year Ended December
    31,
     
        2024     2023     2024     2023  
        (in thousands except per share)  
    Revenue   $ 147,455     $ 55,705     $ 500,190     $ 287,921  
    Cost and operating expenses(1):                                
    Cost of revenue     5,420       4,988       20,922       22,455  
    Sales and marketing     114,209       44,594       387,700       240,131  
    Research and development     7,640       5,944       29,553       27,591  
    General and administrative     8,159       6,962       30,264       26,301  
    Restructuring and other charges           (21 )           23,568  
    Acquisition-related costs                       (150 )
    Total cost and operating expenses     135,428       62,467       468,439       339,896  
    Income (loss) from operations     12,027       (6,762 )     31,751       (51,975 )
    Other income:                                
    Interest income     683       382       2,079       1,251  
    Other income, net   24       9     178     14  
    Total other income, net     707       391       2,257       1,265  
    Income (loss) before income taxes     12,734       (6,371 )     34,008       (50,710 )
    Income tax (expense) benefit     (428 )     23       (1,839 )     (577 )
    Net income (loss)   $ 12,306     $ (6,348 )   $ 32,169     $ (51,287 )
    Net income (loss) per share:                                
    Basic   $ 0.35     $ (0.19 )   $ 0.92     $ (1.54 )
    Diluted   $ 0.33     $ (0.19 )   $ 0.88     $ (1.54 )
    Weighted average common shares
        outstanding, basic and diluted
                                   
    Basic     35,490       33,954       35,007       33,350  
    Diluted     37,051       33,954       36,646       33,350  
                                     
    (1) Amounts include stock-based compensation expense, as follows:                          
        Three Months Ended
    December 31,
        Year Ended December
    31,
     
        2024     2023     2024     2023  
        (in thousands)  
    Cost of revenue   $ 53     $ 49     $ 182     $ 219  
    Sales and marketing     1,713       1,906       6,796       8,667  
    Research and development     1,422       1,574       5,502       8,053  
    General and administrative     2,122       1,284       8,134       5,869  
    Restructuring and other charges                       1,288  
        $ 5,310     $ 4,813     $ 20,614     $ 24,096  
     
     
    EVERQUOTE, INC.
    BALANCE SHEET DATA
     
        December 31,  
        2024     2023  
        (in thousands)  
    Cash and cash equivalents   $ 102,116     $ 37,956  
    Working capital     99,131       39,293  
    Total assets     210,530       110,925  
    Total liabilities     75,162       30,018  
    Total stockholders’ equity     135,368       80,907  
     
     
    EVERQUOTE, INC.
    STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
     
        Three Months Ended
    December 31,
        Year Ended December
    31,
     
        2024     2023     2024     2023  
        (in thousands)  
    Cash flows from operating activities:                                
    Net income (loss)   $ 12,306     $ (6,348 )   $ 32,169     $ (51,287 )
    Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by
       (used in) operating activities:
                                   
    Depreciation and amortization     1,555       1,075       5,672       6,196  
    Stock-based compensation expense     5,310       4,813       20,614       24,096  
    Loss on sale of health assets                       19,388  
    Impairment of right-of-use asset                       384  
    Change in fair value of contingent consideration
       liabilities
                          (150 )
    Provision for (recovery of) bad debt     (3 )     18       13       204  
    Unrealized foreign currency transaction (gains) losses     (82 )     22       (26 )     21  
    Changes in operating assets and liabilities:                                
    Accounts receivable     (13,099 )     952       (40,178 )     8,219  
    Prepaid expenses and other current assets     128       (1,675 )     440       962  
    Commissions receivable, current and non-current     1,158       1,565       4,880       4,176  
    Operating lease right-of-use assets     371       491       2,213       2,497  
    Other assets           385       (291 )     421  
    Accounts payable     12,961       (3,382 )     42,664       (13,411 )
    Accrued expenses and other current liabilities     (73 )     1,979       1,040       (1,543 )
    Deferred revenue     (14 )     (29 )     (107 )     5  
    Operating lease liabilities     (384 )     (658 )     (2,537 )     (3,006 )
    Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities     20,134       (792 )     66,566       (2,828 )
    Cash flows from investing activities:                                
    Acquisition of property and equipment, including costs
        capitalized for development of internal-use software
        (1,003 )     (852 )     (4,114 )     (3,840 )
    Proceeds from sale of health assets                       13,194  
    Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities     (1,003 )     (852 )     (4,114 )     9,354  
    Cash flows from financing activities:                                
    Proceeds from exercise of stock options     651       639       3,553       979  
    Tax withholding payments related to net share settlement     (496 )     (103 )     (1,846 )     (402 )
    Net cash provided by financing activities     155       536       1,707       577  
    Effect of exchange rate changes on cash,
        cash equivalents and restricted cash
        (11 )     15       1       18  
    Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and
       restricted cash
        19,275       (1,093 )     64,160       7,121  
    Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning
       of period
        82,841       39,049       37,956       30,835  
    Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end
       of period
      $ 102,116     $ 37,956     $ 102,116     $ 37,956  
     
     
    EVERQUOTE, INC.
    FINANCIAL AND OPERATING METRICS
    Revenue by vertical:
        Three Months Ended
    December 31,
        Change  
        2024     2023     %  
        (in thousands)          
    Automotive   $ 135,930     $ 44,985       202.2 %
    Home and Renters     11,298       9,821       15.0 %
    Other     227       899       -74.7 %
    Total Revenue   $ 147,455     $ 55,705       164.7 %
        Year Ended December 31,     Change  
        2024     2023     %  
        (in thousands)          
    Automotive   $ 446,095     $ 227,505       96.1 %
    Home and Renters     52,013       40,889       27.2 %
    Other     2,082       19,527       -89.3 %
    Total Revenue   $ 500,190     $ 287,921       73.7 %
                             
    Other financial and non-financial metrics:
        Three Months Ended
    December 31,
        Change  
        2024     2023     %  
        (in thousands)          
    Income (loss) from operations   $ 12,027     $ (6,762 )     -277.9 %
    Net income (loss)   $ 12,306     $ (6,348 )     -293.9 %
    Variable marketing dollars   $ 44,023     $ 20,668       113.0 %
    Adjusted EBITDA(1)   $ 18,916     $ (886 )   NM  
        Year Ended December 31,     Change  
        2024     2023     %  
        (in thousands)          
    Income (loss) from operations   $ 31,751     $ (51,975 )     -161.1 %
    Net income (loss)   $ 32,169     $ (51,287 )     -162.7 %
    Variable marketing dollars   $ 155,227     $ 100,282       54.8 %
    Adjusted EBITDA(1)   $ 58,215     $ 461     NM  
     
    (1 ) Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP measure. Please see “EverQuote, Inc. Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures to GAAP” below for more information.
         

    To supplement the Company’s financial statements presented in accordance with GAAP and to provide investors with additional information regarding EverQuote’s financial results, the Company has presented Adjusted EBITDA as a non-GAAP financial measure. This non-GAAP financial measure is not based on any standardized methodology prescribed by GAAP and is not necessarily comparable to similarly titled measures presented by other companies.

    The Company defines Adjusted EBITDA as net income (loss), excluding the impact of stock-based compensation expense; depreciation and amortization expense; restructuring and other charges; acquisition-related costs; interest income; and income taxes. The most directly comparable GAAP measure is net income (loss). The Company monitors and presents Adjusted EBITDA because it is a key measure used by management and the board of directors to understand and evaluate operating performance, to establish budgets and to develop operational goals for managing EverQuote’s business. In particular, the Company believes that excluding the impact of these items in calculating Adjusted EBITDA can provide a useful measure for period-to-period comparisons of EverQuote’s core operating performance.

    The Company uses Adjusted EBITDA to evaluate EverQuote’s operating performance and trends and make planning decisions. The Company believes that this non-GAAP financial measure helps identify underlying trends in EverQuote’s business that could otherwise be masked by the effect of the items that the Company excludes in the calculations of Adjusted EBITDA. Accordingly, the Company believes that this financial measure provides useful information to investors and others in understanding and evaluating EverQuote’s operating results, enhancing the overall understanding of the Company’s past performance and future prospects.

    The Company’s non-GAAP financial measures are not prepared in accordance with GAAP and should not be considered in isolation of, or as an alternative to, measures prepared in accordance with GAAP. There are a number of limitations related to the use of Adjusted EBITDA rather than net income (loss), which is the most directly comparable financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP. In addition, other companies may use other measures to evaluate their performance, which could reduce the usefulness of the Company’s non-GAAP financial measures as tools for comparison.

    The following table reconciles Adjusted EBITDA to net income (loss), the most directly comparable financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP.

     
    EVERQUOTE, INC.
    RECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP MEASURES TO GAAP
     
        Three Months Ended
    December 31,
        Year Ended December
    31,
     
        2024     2023     2024     2023  
        (in thousands)  
    Net income (loss)   $ 12,306     $ (6,348 )   $ 32,169     $ (51,287 )
    Stock-based compensation     5,310       4,813       20,614       22,808  
    Depreciation and amortization     1,555       1,075       5,672       6,196  
    Restructuring and other charges           (21 )           23,568  
    Acquisition-related costs                       (150 )
    Interest income     (683 )     (382 )     (2,079 )     (1,251 )
    Income taxes     428       (23 )     1,839       577  
    Adjusted EBITDA   $ 18,916     $ (886 )   $ 58,215     $ 461  

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Security: Former Fort Campbell Soldier Sentenced to Over Five Years in Federal Prison for Child Exploitation Offenses

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    Paducah, KY – A former Fort Campbell soldier was sentenced last week to 5 years and 4 months in federal prison for receiving and distributing child pornography.     

    U.S. Attorney Michael A. Bennett of the Western District of Kentucky and Special Agent in Charge Michael E. Stansbury of the Federal Bureau of Investigation Louisville Field Office made the announcement.

    According to court documents, Brett Nicolas Ellison, 24, was sentenced to 5 years and 4 months in prison, followed by 5 years of supervised release, for one count of receipt of child pornography and one count of possession of child pornography. Between November 2019 and June 2022, Ellison received and possessed child sexual abuse material while he was a soldier stationed at the Fort Campbell Army Post, possessing over 90 images and 70 videos containing child sexual abuse material.

    Ellison was also ordered to pay $57,000 in restitution to victims.

    There is no parole in the federal system.

    This case was investigated by the FBI Hopkinsville Satellite Office and Army CID.

    Assistant U.S. Attorney Raymond McGee, of the U.S. Attorney’s Paducah Branch Office, prosecuted the case.

    This case was brought as part of Project Safe Childhood, a nationwide initiative launched in May 2006 by the Department of Justice to combat the growing epidemic of child sexual exploitation and abuse. Led by the United States Attorneys’ Offices and the Criminal Division’s Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, Project Safe Childhood marshals federal, state, and local resources to locate, apprehend, and prosecute individuals who sexually exploit children, and to identify and rescue victims. For more information about Project Safe Childhood, please visit www.usdoj.gov/psc. For more information about internet safety education, please visit www.usdoj.gov/psc and click on the tab “resources.”

    ###

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: Mexican National Charged with Transporting Illegal Aliens

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    KANSAS CITY, Mo. – A Mexican national who was arrested while transporting five other illegal immigrants through Missouri has been charged in a federal criminal complaint for his role in a conspiracy to transport illegal aliens.

    Lisandro Garcia Ramirez, 22, was charged in a seven-count criminal complaint filed in the U.S. District Court in Kansas City, Mo., on Saturday, Feb. 22. Ramirez will have his initial court appearance today. The federal criminal complaint charges Ramirez with one count of conspiracy to transport illegal aliens, five counts of transporting illegal aliens, and one count of illegally entering the United States.

    According to an affidavit filed in support of the criminal complaint, troopers with the Missouri Highway Patrol stopped the Honda Pilot Ramirez was driving on the night of Friday, Feb. 22, on Interstate 70 in Mayview, Mo., just south of Marshall, Mo. Ramirez and five passengers told the trooper they were illegally in the United States.

    Ramirez told federal investigators that he had been transporting people for approximately six months, twice a  month, with three to five people each trip. During the six-month period, Ramirez transported people from Arizona to several locations, including New York, Tennessee, and Chicago. Ramirez stated he was paid approximately $600 per trip with additional payments of up to $3,000.

    Each of the five passengers transported by Ramirez told investigators they paid to be smuggled illegally into the United States, where they were picked up by Ramirez.

    The charges contained in this complaint are simply accusations, and not evidence of guilt. Evidence supporting the charges must be presented to a federal trial jury, whose duty is to determine guilt or innocence.

    This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Ken Borgnino. It was investigated by Homeland Security Investigations.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI USA: Prolific Alien Smuggler Extradited from Mexico to the United States in Joint Task Force Alpha Investigation

    Source: US State of Vermont

    Extensive coordination and cooperation efforts between U.S. and Mexican law enforcement authorities culminated in the extradition of an alleged alien smuggler who operated in Mexicali on the U.S.-Mexico border for several years as part of an international alien smuggling conspiracy.

    Raul Saucedo-Huipio, 49, was arrested in Mexico on March 2, 2023, pursuant to a U.S. request for his extradition, and was surrendered by Mexico to U.S. authorities on Feb. 21 to face charges previously filed in the District of Arizona. Saucedo-Huipio made his initial appearance on Feb. 21 in the Southern District of California. His co-conspirator, Ofelia Hernandez-Salas, 62, was extradited to the United States from Mexico in 2023 and pleaded guilty on Dec. 18, 2024, to conspiracy to bring an alien to the United States and substantive counts of bringing an alien to the United States.

    According to court documents, Saucedo-Huipio conspired with other smugglers, including Hernandez-Salas, to facilitate the travel of large numbers of migrants into the United States from and through Bangladesh, Yemen, Pakistan, Eritrea, India, the United Arab Emirates, Uzbekistan, Russia, Egypt, Brazil, Peru, Ecuador, Colombia, Costa Rica, Nicaragua, El Salvador, Honduras, Guatemala, and Mexico. Saucedo-Huipio and Hernandez-Salas allegedly charged the migrants as much as tens of thousands of dollars to make the journey and directed the migrants where to unlawfully cross the border into the United States, including by providing them with a ladder to climb over the border fence. Saucedo-Huipio and co-conspirators also allegedly robbed the migrants of money and personal belongings while armed with guns and knives.

    In June 2023, the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) imposed corresponding sanctions on this transnational criminal organization.

    Supervisory Official Antoinette T. Bacon of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division, Acting U.S. Attorney Rachel C. Hernandez for the District of Arizona, and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Homeland Security Investigations (ICE HSI) Arizona Special Agent in Charge Francisco B. Burrola, made the announcement.

    ICE HSI Yuma is investigating the case with assistance from U.S. Border Patrol, Customs and Border Protection (CBP); U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s Enforcement and Removal Operations; FBI; and the U.S. Marshals Service, working in concert with ICE HSI Tijuana, INTERPOL, and the HSI Human Smuggling Unit in Washington, D.C. HSI also received substantial assistance from CBP’s National Targeting Center/Counter Network Division and OFAC.

    Trial Attorney Alexandra Skinnion of the Criminal Division’s Human Rights and Special Prosecutions Section (HRSP) and Assistant U.S. Attorney Stuart J. Zander for the District of Arizona are prosecuting the case.

    The Justice Department’s Office of International Affairs (OIA) provided significant assistance in securing the defendant’s arrest and extradition from Mexico. The Justice Department thanks its Mexican law enforcement partners, who were instrumental in arresting Saucedo-Huipio, and the Mexican Attorney General’s Office and the Mexican Foreign Ministry for making the extradition possible.

    The indictments against Raul Saucedo-Huipio and Hernandez-Salas, and their subsequent arrests and extraditions, were coordinated through Joint Task Force Alpha (JTFA). JTFA was created in partnership with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to strengthen the Justice Department’s efforts to combat the rise in prolific and dangerous smuggling emanating from Central America and impacting our border communities. JTFA’s goal is to disrupt and dismantle human smuggling and trafficking networks operating in El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, and Mexico, with a focus on networks that endanger, abuse, or exploit migrants, present national security risks, or engage in other types of transnational organized crime. The initiative was expanded to Colombia and Panama to combat human smuggling in the Darién in June 2024. JTFA comprises detailees from U.S. Attorneys’ Offices along the southwest border, including the Southern District of California, the District of Arizona, the District of New Mexico, and the Western and Southern Districts of Texas. Dedicated support is provided by numerous components of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division, led by HRSP and supported by the Office of Prosecutorial Development, Assistance and Training; the Narcotic and Dangerous Drug Section; the Money Laundering and Asset Recovery Section; the Office of Enforcement Operations; OIA; and the Violent Crime and Racketeering Section. JTFA also relies on substantial law enforcement investment from DHS, FBI, the Drug Enforcement Administration, and other partners. To date, JTFA’s work has resulted in over 355 domestic and international arrests of leaders, organizers, and significant facilitators of human smuggling; more than 300 U.S. convictions; more than 245 significant jail sentences imposed; and forfeitures of substantial assets.

    This investigation is also supported by the Extraterritorial Criminal Travel Strike Force (ECT) program, a partnership between the Justice Department’s Criminal Division and HSI. The ECT program focuses on human smuggling networks that may present particular national security or public safety risks or raise grave humanitarian concerns. ECT has dedicated investigative, intelligence, and prosecutorial resources. ECT also coordinates and receives assistance from other U.S. government agencies and foreign law enforcement authorities.

    An indictment is merely an allegation. All defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Security: Prolific Alien Smuggler Extradited from Mexico to the United States in Joint Task Force Alpha Investigation

    Source: United States Attorneys General 1

    Extensive coordination and cooperation efforts between U.S. and Mexican law enforcement authorities culminated in the extradition of an alleged alien smuggler who operated in Mexicali on the U.S.-Mexico border for several years as part of an international alien smuggling conspiracy.

    Raul Saucedo-Huipio, 49, was arrested in Mexico on March 2, 2023, pursuant to a U.S. request for his extradition, and was surrendered by Mexico to U.S. authorities on Feb. 21 to face charges previously filed in the District of Arizona. Saucedo-Huipio made his initial appearance on Feb. 21 in the Southern District of California. His co-conspirator, Ofelia Hernandez-Salas, 62, was extradited to the United States from Mexico in 2023 and pleaded guilty on Dec. 18, 2024, to conspiracy to bring an alien to the United States and substantive counts of bringing an alien to the United States.

    According to court documents, Saucedo-Huipio conspired with other smugglers, including Hernandez-Salas, to facilitate the travel of large numbers of migrants into the United States from and through Bangladesh, Yemen, Pakistan, Eritrea, India, the United Arab Emirates, Uzbekistan, Russia, Egypt, Brazil, Peru, Ecuador, Colombia, Costa Rica, Nicaragua, El Salvador, Honduras, Guatemala, and Mexico. Saucedo-Huipio and Hernandez-Salas allegedly charged the migrants as much as tens of thousands of dollars to make the journey and directed the migrants where to unlawfully cross the border into the United States, including by providing them with a ladder to climb over the border fence. Saucedo-Huipio and co-conspirators also allegedly robbed the migrants of money and personal belongings while armed with guns and knives.

    In June 2023, the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) imposed corresponding sanctions on this transnational criminal organization.

    Supervisory Official Antoinette T. Bacon of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division, Acting U.S. Attorney Rachel C. Hernandez for the District of Arizona, and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Homeland Security Investigations (ICE HSI) Arizona Special Agent in Charge Francisco B. Burrola, made the announcement.

    ICE HSI Yuma is investigating the case with assistance from U.S. Border Patrol, Customs and Border Protection (CBP); U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s Enforcement and Removal Operations; FBI; and the U.S. Marshals Service, working in concert with ICE HSI Tijuana, INTERPOL, and the HSI Human Smuggling Unit in Washington, D.C. HSI also received substantial assistance from CBP’s National Targeting Center/Counter Network Division and OFAC.

    Trial Attorney Alexandra Skinnion of the Criminal Division’s Human Rights and Special Prosecutions Section (HRSP) and Assistant U.S. Attorney Stuart J. Zander for the District of Arizona are prosecuting the case.

    The Justice Department’s Office of International Affairs (OIA) provided significant assistance in securing the defendant’s arrest and extradition from Mexico. The Justice Department thanks its Mexican law enforcement partners, who were instrumental in arresting Saucedo-Huipio, and the Mexican Attorney General’s Office and the Mexican Foreign Ministry for making the extradition possible.

    The indictments against Raul Saucedo-Huipio and Hernandez-Salas, and their subsequent arrests and extraditions, were coordinated through Joint Task Force Alpha (JTFA). JTFA was created in partnership with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to strengthen the Justice Department’s efforts to combat the rise in prolific and dangerous smuggling emanating from Central America and impacting our border communities. JTFA’s goal is to disrupt and dismantle human smuggling and trafficking networks operating in El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, and Mexico, with a focus on networks that endanger, abuse, or exploit migrants, present national security risks, or engage in other types of transnational organized crime. The initiative was expanded to Colombia and Panama to combat human smuggling in the Darién in June 2024. JTFA comprises detailees from U.S. Attorneys’ Offices along the southwest border, including the Southern District of California, the District of Arizona, the District of New Mexico, and the Western and Southern Districts of Texas. Dedicated support is provided by numerous components of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division, led by HRSP and supported by the Office of Prosecutorial Development, Assistance and Training; the Narcotic and Dangerous Drug Section; the Money Laundering and Asset Recovery Section; the Office of Enforcement Operations; OIA; and the Violent Crime and Racketeering Section. JTFA also relies on substantial law enforcement investment from DHS, FBI, the Drug Enforcement Administration, and other partners. To date, JTFA’s work has resulted in over 355 domestic and international arrests of leaders, organizers, and significant facilitators of human smuggling; more than 300 U.S. convictions; more than 245 significant jail sentences imposed; and forfeitures of substantial assets.

    This investigation is also supported by the Extraterritorial Criminal Travel Strike Force (ECT) program, a partnership between the Justice Department’s Criminal Division and HSI. The ECT program focuses on human smuggling networks that may present particular national security or public safety risks or raise grave humanitarian concerns. ECT has dedicated investigative, intelligence, and prosecutorial resources. ECT also coordinates and receives assistance from other U.S. government agencies and foreign law enforcement authorities.

    An indictment is merely an allegation. All defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: Two Rock Hill Men Sentenced to Federal Prison for Their Role in Drug Conspiracy (DOJ)

    Source: United States Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Explosives (ATF)

    strong>COLUMBIA, S.C. — Emmanuel Deon Foster, 36, and Bobby Antoinios Hall, 41, both of Rock Hill, have been sentenced for their involvement in a conspiracy to distribute quantities of fentanyl, crack cocaine, cocaine, methamphetamine, and heroin.   

    Evidence obtained in the investigation revealed that Foster and Hall had a close relationship with the leader of the conspiracy. Based upon law enforcement efforts, they learned both Foster and Hall purchased fentanyl-lased pills during the time of the conspiracy from the leader.  These pills were then sold to other dealers in the Rock Hill area. Foster also purchased and sold cocaine, crack cocaine, heroin, marijuana, and methamphetamine. These drugs were purchased from other members of the conspiracy and sold to other dealers. This operation has been responsible for the arrest and conviction of more than 20 individuals during its existence.

    United States District Mary Geiger Lewis sentenced Foster to a total of 120 months imprisonment, to be followed by a five-year term of court-ordered supervision. Hall was sentenced to 84 months imprisonment to be followed by a three-year term of court-ordered supervision. There is no parole in the federal system.

    This joint law enforcement activity and prosecution is part of an Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Forces (OCDETF) investigation. OCDETF identifies, disrupts, and dismantles the highest-level drug traffickers, money launderers, gangs, and transnational criminal organizations that threaten the United States by using a prosecutor-led, intelligence-driven, multi-agency approach that leverages the strengths of federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies against criminal networks. Additional information about the OCDETF Program can be found at https://www.justice.gov/OCDETF.

    This case was investigated by the FBI Columbia Field Office, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, Drug Enforcement Administration, York County Multijurisdictional Drug Enforcement Unit, South Carolina Law Enforcement Division, and the Richland County Sheriff’s Department.  Assistant U.S. Attorney William K. Witherspoon is prosecuting the case.

    ###

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-Evening Report: Trump, Putin and Musk all share a leadership style – we’ve figured out what it is

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Andrei Lux, Lecturer of Leadership and Research Cluster Lead, Edith Cowan University

    Dictatorships would appear to be on the rise. Russian president Vladimir Putin, US president Donald Trump and even un-elected tech entrepreneur, Elon Musk are ruling by decree like “kings”.

    Some might naively call these leaders “authentic” for saying and often doing what they believe. But that’s not the whole story.

    Such unilateral decisions are deeply divisive, and often opposed. In the US, the federal court blocked Trump’s executive order banning workplace diversity, equity and inclusion programs to try to contain the damage.

    Researchers used to think that authenticity was inherently good and moral. But as authentic leadership research gets more sophisticated with robust experimental methods, what we know about this powerful approach is changing quickly.

    Experiments use controlled simulations and real-world field trials to show how leadership behaviour influences followers. These new methods are the gold standard for establishing cause-and-effect relationships, and they’re challenging old ideas.

    Authentic leadership redefined

    After 20 years of research, we’ve redefined authentic leadership as a process of sending leadership “signals”. What leaders say and do sends powerful messages about their values.

    In a digital age where every tweet and public act is scrutinised, understanding these signals is important for employees and voters. And keeping up with this new way of expressing authentic leadership is vital for anyone seeking to lead in today’s volatile world.

    In our latest article, we looked at what authentic leadership involves and why signalling is so important.

    But what exactly is “signalling”?

    Sending leadership ‘signals’

    Everything leaders do or say – how they behave, express themselves, look, and communicate – sends messages to everyone watching. These messages are “signals”. Leaders influence their followers by sending signals that will trigger specific thoughts or emotions.

    But executive life is complex and full of inherent contradictions between personal authenticity and the demands of leadership roles.

    High-profile figures such as Musk and Trump show how leadership signals can be polarising. Just last week Musk used his social media platform X (formerly Twitter) to call for an unconstitutional election in Ukraine.

    Musk’s edicts and announcements have prompted demonstrations around the US.
    Rena Schild/Shutterstock

    Signalling authentic leadership

    Demonstrating authentic leadership depends on sending clear, observable signals that reflect the leaders’ principles and ethical convictions.

    Here are some tips for spotting authentic leadership signals in everyday interactions. It is notable that it’s easier to find examples of leaders displaying the complete opposite.

    1. Self-awareness

    Leaders signal self-awareness by regularly seeking honest feedback and reflecting on their own strengths and weaknesses. They openly acknowledge mistakes and share their learning. They value personal growth and continuous improvement.

    Instead, Trump repeatedly ignores his own mistakes, even after they are exposed. His latest claim to be debunked was that Ukrainian President Zelensky’s approval was 4%, while his actual approval is closer to 60%.

    2. Internal moral perspective

    Leaders signal an internal moral perspective by making decisions – even if they are unpopular – firmly rooted in core ethical values. Upholding these values and encouraging open discussions on ethics is a principled approach to leadership.

    Instead, Musk has given federal workers 48 hours to justify their employment. The directive leaves little room for open dialogue on the ethical rationale or moral implications of such a drastic measure. He relies, instead, on top-down command.

    Key federal agencies including the FBI and Pentagon have told employees to ignore the email.

    3. Balanced processing

    Leaders signal balanced processing by seeking different views and considering all options before making a decision. Admitting any biases and using team brainstorming or surveys, ensures fair and informed decision-making.

    Instead, Trump has signed more than 50 executive orders since taking office in January. These include some that are unlawful, as an open display of personal bias and unilateral decision-making.

    4. Relational transparency

    Leaders signal relational transparency by sharing appropriate personal experiences and vulnerabilities with their teams. Being honest about limitations and inviting open dialogue builds trust through genuine and consistent communication.

    Instead social media guru, Mark Zuckerberg, another Trump ally, assured staff his charity the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative would continue its commitment to diversity, equity and inclusion. Then, only weeks later, he dismantled it.

    You can’t just fake it, either

    Leadership signals can convey honest information or be manipulated to send contrived messages.

    Trying to fake it doesn’t work. Leadership behaviour has to align with the leaders’ real values and internal sense of self – otherwise it’s not authentic leadership. It’s just impression management.

    Learning the difference empowers us to understand leaders’ actions and better navigate the post-truth era of global business and politics.

    Andrei Lux works for Edith Cowan University and is a Member of the Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management.

    Kevin Brian Lowe does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Trump, Putin and Musk all share a leadership style – we’ve figured out what it is – https://theconversation.com/trump-putin-and-musk-all-share-a-leadership-style-weve-figured-out-what-it-is-250502

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI USA: Sen. Sally Harrell and Sen. Elena Parent Introduce Legislation to Create Voluntary “No Sell” Firearms List

    Source: US State of Georgia

    ATLANTA (February 24, 2025) — Last week, Sen. Sally Harrell (D–Atlanta) and Sen. Elena Parent (D–Atlanta) filed Senate Bill 224, “Donna’s Law,” to allow Georgia citizens at risk for suicidal ideations to place themselves on the FBI’s National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) Firearms Checks List to protect themselves.

    Donna’s Law would allow individuals to place themselves on the list through a healthcare professional or under oath through a probate court in their county of residence. Once an individual applies, they would be placed on the NICS firearms checklist within 24 hours. The legislation also allows applicants to remove themselves from the list no sooner than seven days after they apply.

    “This is an important way we can support and protect people suffering from mental illness. Sadly, as I was working on this bill, a friend of my family took her life with a firearm,” said Sen. Harrell. “Studies show that suicides are often very hasty decisions that are not well thought out. Donna’s Law could help prevent people who are suffering from making impulsive decisions.”

    “The last few years, we’ve been very focused on finding better solutions to help people with mental health issues. Firearms are used in over half of suicides in Georgia. With firearms, there are very few second chances — about 85% of gun suicide attempts result in death,” said Sen. Parent. “We have the opportunity to offer an important tool to reduce the probability of death or self-harm to those who are suffering from mental health challenges and the professionals who treat them.”

    If passed, Georgia would become the fourth state to adopt this legislation. The law is named for Donna Nathan, who suffered from bipolar disorder for 30 years and voluntarily admitted herself to psychiatric treatment facilities to protect herself.  In 2018, she googled “gun stores,” drove to one, purchased a gun and shot herself, ending her life.

    For the full version of SB 224, read here.

    # # # #

    Sen. Sally Harrell represents the 40th Senate District which includes portions of DeKalb and Gwinnett County. She may be reached by phone at (404) 463-2260 via email at sally.harrell@senate.ga.gov.

    Sen. Elena Parent serves as Chairwoman of the Senate Democratic Caucus. She represents the 44th Senate District which includes portions of DeKalb and Clayton County. She may be reached at her office at (404) 656-5109 or by email at elena.parent@senate.ga.gov.

    For all media inquiries, please reach out to SenatePressInquiries@senate.ga.gov.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Security: U.S. Attorney’s Office Secures Guilty Plea in Child Exploitation Case

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    ALBUQUERQUE – A Shiprock man pled guilty to federal charges of using social media and text messages to entice a minor into illegal sexual activity.

    There is no parole in the federal system.

    According to court documents, between February 1, 2021, and April 1, 2021, Kenzie Roy Rockmen, 26, an enrolled member of the Navajo Nation, used text messages and Facebook communications to coerce a minor to engage in illegal sexual acts.

    Rockmen was charged along with his brother, Dustin Roy Rockmen. On October 15, 2024, Dustin pled guilty to coercion and enticement of a minor and was sentenced to 17 years in prison.

    At sentencing, Rockmen faces not less than 120 months and up to 135 months in prison, followed by not less than five years and up to life of supervised release.

    Acting U.S. Attorney Holland S. Kastrin and Raul Bujanda, Special Agent in Charge of the FBI Albuquerque Field Office, made the announcement today.

    The Gallup Resident Agency of the FBI Albuquerque Field Office investigated this case with assistance from the Navajo Police Department and Navajo Department of Criminal Investigations. Assistant U.S. Attorney Robert James Booth II and Mark A. Probasco are prosecuting this case as part of Project Safe Childhood, a nationwide initiative to combat the growing epidemic of child sexual exploitation and abuse launched in May 2006 by the Department of Justice. Led by U.S. Attorneys’ Offices and CEOS, Project Safe Childhood marshals federal, state, and local resources to better locate, apprehend and prosecute individuals who exploit children via the Internet, as well as to identify and rescue victims. For more information about Project Safe Childhood, please visit Justice.gov/PSC.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI USA: Rosen, Cortez Masto Demand Transparency Regarding Termination of NNSA Personnel

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Jacky Rosen (D-NV)

    WASHINGTON, DC – U.S. Senator Jacky Rosen (D-NV) and Catherine Cortez Masto (D-NV) sent a letter to President Trump’s Department of Energy (DOE) and National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) regarding recent terminations of NNSA personnel. Given the NNSA’s role in maintaining and modernizing the American nuclear stockpile, largely done at the Nevada National Security Sites (NNSS), the senators expressed grave concern that the chaotic terminations could harm American national security.
    “NNSA personnel possess highly specialized expertise that is not easily replaceable, and any disruption to their work could have far-reaching consequences for U.S. national security and global nuclear stability,” wrote the Senators. “Reductions in staff, particularly among senior leadership and technical experts, could compromise the continuity of critical programs, modernization, and weaken the ability of the U.S. to respond to emerging nuclear threats.”
    “Adding to these concerns, there are reports the NNSA is now attempting to rehire the terminated employees but has been unable to contact some of them,” they continued. “The fact that the agency is struggling to restore essential personnel suggests these firings were premature, mismanaged, or not conducted with full consideration of the potential impacts on national security operations.”
    The senators asked that the following information about the terminations be made public:

     The total number of National Nuclear Security Administration employees who were terminated, including those in Nevada.
    Any planned future rounds of firings, including those in Nevada.
    The specific positions and responsibilities of these employees.
    How many employees, if any, have been successfully rehired.
    A detailed explanation of the rationale behind these terminations, including any financial, policy, or strategic considerations that led to these decisions.
    How the hiring freeze, put in place by the current administration, impacts the mission at NNSA.
    A detailed assessment on how these firings and then rehirings impact any future recruitment at the NNSA.

    The full text of the letter can be found here.
    Senators Rosen and Cortez Masto are champions for strengthening American national security, especially at sites like the NNSS. They have consistently voted to deliver critical funding to the NNSS. They also have a strong history of opposing nuclear waste disposal at Yucca Mountain and have introduced legislation to ensure the Secretary of Energy obtains written consent from state, local, and tribal leaders before allowing construction of a nuclear waste repository.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Security: Child Predator Sentenced to 20 Years in Federal Prison after Transporting 14-Year-Old Michigan Girl Across State Lines for Sex and Impregnating Her

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    INDIANAPOLIS— Larry Goldsmith., 26, of Indianapolis, has been sentenced to 20 years in federal prison, followed by a lifetime of supervised release after pleading guilty to transportation of a minor with intent to engage in sexual activity.

    According to court documents, in 2020, Goldsmith began messaging a 14-year-old girl living in Michigan through the social media applications Spot-a-Friend and Snapchat. Goldsmith knew of the child’s age at the time yet engaged in sexually explicit conversations with her. 

    At the end of August 2020, the child got into a verbal argument with her mother and expressed to Goldsmith that she wanted to run away from home. Goldsmith drove over four hours to Michigan and picked her up at a business near her home. Goldsmith was 21 years old at the time.

    On the way back to Indiana, Goldsmith engaged in sexually explicit conduct with the child at a rest stop in Michigan and then transported her across state lines to a home he rented in Indianapolis.  During their time living together, Goldsmith had sex with the child numerous times and impregnated her.

    After committing these offenses, Goldsmith continued his sexual abuse of minors by committing essentially the same conduct with another child in Georgia – where he drugged and raped a 13-year-old. In 2022, Goldsmith pleaded guilty to those crimes in Georgia and was sentenced to 15 years in federal prison, which he is currently serving.

    “Goldsmith is no longer a danger to children and families in our community,” said John E. Childress, Acting United States Attorney for the Southern District of Indiana. “He is a manipulative, child predator who used the tools of social media to abuse a vulnerable child over and over again. I commend the outstanding work of local law enforcement agencies in Indiana and Georgia, along with the FBI, to bring the victim home safely.”

    “The FBI is unwavering in our mission to protect the most vulnerable members of our society – our children. This case highlights the disturbing reality of sexual exploitation, and the sentence ensures this predator will remain behind bars and unable to continue to perpetrate such atrocities,” said FBI Indianapolis Special Agent in Charge Herbert J. Stapleton. “The FBI and our law enforcement partners remain steadfast in our commitment to work together to ensure no child is victimized in this way.”

    “This sentence sends a clear message—those who harm children will be held accountable,” said IMPD Chief Chris Bailey. “The dedication and diligence of our IMPD officers, along with law enforcement agencies across the country, played a critical role in getting this predator behind bars.”

    The Federal Bureau of Investigation and IMPD investigated this case. The sentence was imposed by U.S. District Judge Matthew P. Brookman. Under federal law, Goldsmith must register as a sex offender wherever he lives, works, or goes to school for life.

    Acting U.S. Attorney Childress thanked Assistant U.S. Attorney MaryAnn T. Mindrum, who prosecuted this case.

    This case was brought as part of Project Safe Childhood, a nationwide initiative launched in May 2006 by the Department of Justice to combat the growing epidemic of child sexual exploitation and abuse. Led by U.S. Attorneys’ Offices and the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, Project Safe Childhood marshals federal, state, and local resources to better locate, apprehend and prosecute individuals who exploit children via the internet, as well as to identify and rescue victims.

    ###

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: Seven Charged In Central Florida Gun Trafficking Scheme

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    Orlando, Florida – Acting United States Attorney Sara C. Sweeney announces the return of an indictment charging six individuals involved in an alleged gun trafficking operation. An additional individual was separately charged by complaint in the same conspiracy. The indictment also notifies the defendants that the United States intends to forfeit specific firearms recovered in the operation. 

    Name

    (Age, City of Residence)

    Charge Maximum Penalties

    Victor Manuel LaFontaine Ruiz

    (31, Poinciana)

    Gun trafficking conspiracy  

    Unlicensed gun dealing, aiding and abetting

    Possession of machinegun

    15 years 

    5 years 

    10 years

    Jose Emanuel Maldonado Rodriguez

    (32, Kissimmee)

    Gun trafficking conspiracy 

    Unlicensed gun dealing, aiding and abetting

    Possession of machinegun

    15 years 

    5 years 

    10 years

    Freddie Geovani Cruz Batiz

    (36, Kissimmee)

    Gun trafficking conspiracy 

    Unlicensed gun dealing, aiding and abetting

    15 years 

    5 years 

    Jomar Manuel Lopez Montanez

    (30, Kissimmee)

    Gun trafficking conspiracy

    Unlicensed gun dealing, aiding and abetting

    Felon in possession

    15 years 

    5 years 

    15 years

    Derrick Yamil Rivera Robles

    (29, Kissimmee)

    Gun trafficking conspiracy 

    Unlicensed gun dealing, aiding and abetting

    Possession of machinegun

    15 years 

    5 years 

    10 years

    Leonardo David Joseph Guerra

    (23, Orlando)

    Gun trafficking conspiracy

    Unlicensed gun dealing, aiding and abetting

    Alien in possession

    15 years 

    5 years 

    15 years

    Jincheng Shi

    (27, St. Cloud)

    Unlicensed gun dealing, aiding and abetting

    Alien in possession

    5 years 

    15 years

    According to court documents, from at least as early as September 2023 onward, Lafontaine and Maldonado operated a gun trafficking ring involving hundreds of firearms, machineguns, machinegun conversion devices, and high-capacity magazines needed for fully automatic weapons. This operation did not involve any federally licensed firearms dealers. Instead, Lafontaine and Maldonado obtained firearms parts, including from Jincheng Shi, a Chinese national. Lafontaine and Maldonado allegedly assembled, manufactured, and modified semi-automatic and automatic firearms using a “ghost gunner” machine and specialized “endmill” drilling devices at a workspace on Maldonado’s property in Kissimmee: 

    From there, Lafontaine and Maldonado, along with assistance from Batiz, sold firearms, including fully automatic weapons and machine gun conversion devices (“chips” or “buttons”) that are used to convert semi-automatic weapons into machineguns. They sold those items to illegal aliens and convicted felons such as Lopez Montanez, Rivera Robles, and Joseph Guerra, who were often brokering such transactions on behalf of other unknown customers.

    On September 17, 2023, for example, Lafontaine showed a fully automatic firearm to a customer that was later sold during this operation and, on October 9, 2023, Lafontaine quoted Rivera Robles (a convicted felon) a price of $150 for a machinegun conversion device known as a “chip,” that Rivera Robles purchased in March 2024.               

    On February 7, 2025, Lafontaine sold Lopez Montanez (a convicted felon) two firearms falsely branded to appear as though they were legitimate firearms manufactured with engraved fake sequential serial numbers. When Lopez Montanez was stopped, he fled from law enforcement and attempted to hide the weapons that were eventually recovered. 

    The next day, Lafontaine delivered five similar firearms to Maldonado.           

    On February 20, 2025, law enforcement executed five search warrants at various locations associated with this conspiracy. The items are still be inventoried.  Preliminarily, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) have recovered at least five AR-style pistols with sequential and identical serial numbers at Maldonado’s residence (depicted below), along with at least three machinegun conversion devices, machinery used to assemble, modify, and manufacture the firearms and machine guns sold through this operation. 

     At Lafontaine’s residence, agents recovered a completed rifle, gun parts, gun manufacturing and modification equipment, and drug distribution paraphernalia with a blender and a powder that field-tested positive for fentanyl, packaged for sale. At Batiz’s residence, agents recovered a handgun and an AR pistol, four machinegun conversion devices, along with drug paraphernalia and powders packaged for distribution that are still being tested. Eight handguns, three rifles, and eight AR-style receivers were recovered from Shi’s residence and storage lockers.

    An indictment is merely a formal charge that a defendant has committed one or more violations of federal criminal law, and every defendant is presumed innocent unless, and until, proven guilty.          

    This case was investigated by Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, with assistance from the Metropolitan Bureau of Investigation, Orange County Sheriff’s Office, Orlando Police Department, Winter Garden Police Department, Osceola County Sheriff’s Office, Apopka Police Department, Seminole County Sheriff’s Office, and Florida Highway Patrol. It will be prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Dana E. Hill.

    This case is part of Project Safe Neighborhoods (PSN), a program bringing together all levels of law enforcement and the communities they serve to reduce violent crime and gun violence, and to make our neighborhoods safer for everyone. On May 26, 2021, the Department launched a violent crime reduction strategy strengthening PSN based on these core principles: fostering trust and legitimacy in our communities, supporting community-based organizations that help prevent violence from occurring in the first place, setting focused and strategic enforcement priorities, and measuring the results.

    This case was part of an Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force (OCDETF) investigation. OCDETF identifies, disrupts, and dismantles the highest-level criminal organizations that threaten the United States using a prosecutor-led, intelligence-driven, multi-agency approach. Additional information about the OCDETF Program can be found at www.justice.gov/OCDETF.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Video: Private Sector Coordinators: Connecting Industry with the FBI

    Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) (video statements)

    Our partnerships with Bridgestone, L3Harris, and UPS are just a few examples of how private sector coordinators lead field office engagement with private industry. Our PSCs further the FBI’s mission by extending resources, providing expertise, and mitigating threats to businesses across the United States. Knowing who to connect with is essential to ensuring a timely and efficient response.

    Learn more: fbi.gov/ops

    For a full transcript and download, visit: http://fbi.gov/video-repository/ops-private-sector-coordinators-connecting-industry-fbi-022425.mp4/view
    —————————————————
    Follow us on social media:
    X: https://twitter.com/fbi
    Facebook: https://facebook.com/FBI
    Instagram: https://instagram.com/fbi
    YouTube: youtube.com/user/fbi

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vlemfjPgBtM

    MIL OSI Video

  • MIL-OSI Security: Jury Convicts Former Kansas City Police Officer of $200,000 Charity Fraud Scheme

    Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) State Crime News

    KANSAS CITY, Mo. – A former Kansas City, Mo., police officer who ran an anti-crime charity has been convicted in federal court of a scheme in which he spent more than $200,000 in donations for his own personal expenses.

    Aaron Wayne McKie, 47, was found guilty on Thursday, Feb. 20, of nine counts of wire fraud and one count of money laundering. McKie worked as a police officer for the Kansas City, Mo., Police Department for 24 years, assigned as a police officer to the Crime Free Multi-Housing section from 2002 through 2023.

    McKie served from 2009 to 2023 as president of Mid-America Crime Free, Inc. (MACF), a non-profit organization that claimed to provide training to persons in the rental housing industry and promote anti-crime programs. He was an officer of the charity for three years prior, from 2006 to 2009.

    Evidence produced during the trial indicated that McKie devised a scheme to defraud MACF and its donors that began in July 2009 and lasted until October 2023. Individuals and businesses contributed $387,620 to MACF, not including in-kind donations. McKie spent at least $200,060 for his own personal purposes.

    The biggest source of MACF funds was an annual golf tournament, “Fairways 4 Fuzz Golf Tournament.” Individuals and businesses donated both money and in-kind donations, such as food and beverages, to MACF via the golf tournament. At least 121 donors have been identified.

    From 2009 to 2023, the flyers soliciting donations and players for the tournament claimed the funds raised would enable MACF to provide free seminars to owners of rental properties and train police officers. In reality, those claims were false. The Kansas City Police Department paid the salaries and expenses of Crime Free Multi-Housing unit officers who may have provided training to landlords; McKie used the majority of MACF funds for personal spending; and the IRS had revoked the organization’s tax-exempt status in 2010.

    Under federal statutes, McKie is subject to a sentence of up to 20 years in federal prison without parole on each of the 10 counts on which he was convicted. The maximum statutory sentence is prescribed by Congress and is provided here for informational purposes, as the sentencing of the defendant will be determined by the court based on the advisory sentencing guidelines and other statutory factors. A sentencing hearing will be scheduled after the completion of a presentence investigation by the United States Probation Office.

    Following the presentation of evidence, the jury in the U.S. District Court in Kansas City, Mo., deliberated for nine hours before returning guilty verdicts to U.S. Chief District Judge Beth Phillips, ending a trial that began Monday, Feb. 10.

    This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Kathleen D. Mahoney and Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Amanda Hanson. It was investigated by the FBI and the Kansas City, Mo., Police Department.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI: NANO Nuclear Energy Announced as Two Star Partner of the Institute for Defense and Government Advancement’s Operational Energy Summit with CEO James Walker Scheduled to Present

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    The Operational Energy Summit will be held at the Bethesda Marriot Hotel on February 25-26, 2025

    New York, N.Y., Feb. 24, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — NANO Nuclear Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: NNE) (“NANO Nuclear” or “the Company”), a leading advanced nuclear energy and technology company focused on developing clean energy solutions, today announced that it is a Two Star Partner of the 17th annual Operational Energy Summit, hosted by the Institute for Defense and Government Advancement in Bethesda, Maryland at the Bethesda Marriot Hotel on February 25 -26, 2025.

    On Tuesday, February 25th, Chief Executive Officer and Head of Reactor Development, James Walker, will lead a keynote presentation titled, “The role of innovative nuclear technology to support the defense industry and military operations”, at 1:30 PM. Thereafter, he will also present, “Industry insight session hosted by NANO Nuclear Energy Inc.” at 3:30 PM.

    For over two decades, the Institute for Defense and Government Advancement (IDGA) has served as a non-partisan event and thought leadership organization connecting the Defense and Security communities interested in solving high-level challenges. Through its industry-leading conferences, networking events and online community portal, IDGA supports and coordinates the participation of leading stakeholders across the Government, Military, and associated defense industry partners.

    For its 17th year, the IDGA Operational Energy Summit will bring together operational and installation energy leaders from the U.S. Department of Defense, Department of Energy, allied military, industry, and academia to discuss the current state of military energy and the path forward. This year’s summit will focus on addressing the emerging threat landscape, contested environments, the role of innovative technology, and the challenges and gaps in defense energy to ensure support of military operations. Guided by thought leaders, the summit will explore alternative energy sources, including nuclear and solar power, along with microgrids and technologies for enhancing grid security. As the demand for energy increases to support both current and future weapon systems and technologies, the topics of discussion will include strategies for achieving energy resilience, security, reliability, and sufficiency.

    “The IDGA is at the forefront of efforts to address the U.S. armed forces’ most urgent challenges, particularly in understanding operational and installation energy,” said John G. Vonglis, Executive Director of Global Government Affairs of NANO Nuclear Energy. “This summit will bring together some of the nation’s foremost experts, united by a shared mission to provide service members with robust, reliable, and resilient next-generation energy solutions, with nuclear set to play a key role in discussions.”

    Figure 1 – NANO Nuclear Energy Inc. Announced as the Two Star Partner of the Institute for Defense and Government Advancement’s Operational Energy Summit on February 25-26, 2025.

    “The growing emphasis on nuclear-based energy systems within the U.S. military creates exciting opportunities to deliver reliable, carbon-neutral power to the country’s service members,” said James Walker, Chief Executive Officer and Head of Reactor Development of NANO Nuclear Energy. “This summit provides a valuable platform to connect with key operational leaders throughout the military complex, and I look forward to discussing the future of nuclear energy with all attendees.”

    About NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc.

    NANO Nuclear Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: NNE) is an advanced technology-driven nuclear energy company seeking to become a commercially focused, diversified, and vertically integrated company across five business lines: (i) cutting edge portable and other microreactor technologies, (ii) nuclear fuel fabrication, (iii) nuclear fuel transportation, (iv) nuclear applications for space and (v) nuclear industry consulting services. NANO Nuclear believes it is the first portable nuclear microreactor company to be listed publicly in the U.S.

    Led by a world-class nuclear engineering team, NANO Nuclear’s reactor products in development include “ZEUS”, a solid core battery reactor, and “ODIN”, a low-pressure coolant reactor, each representing advanced developments in clean energy solutions that are portable, on-demand capable, advanced nuclear microreactors. NANO Nuclear is also developing patented stationary KRONOS MMR Energy System and space focused, portable LOKI MMR.

    Advanced Fuel Transportation Inc. (AFT), a NANO Nuclear subsidiary, is led by former executives from the largest transportation company in the world aiming to build a North American transportation company that will provide commercial quantities of HALEU fuel to small modular reactors, microreactor companies, national laboratories, military, and DOE programs. Through NANO Nuclear, AFT is the exclusive licensee of a patented high-capacity HALEU fuel transportation basket developed by three major U.S. national nuclear laboratories and funded by the Department of Energy. Assuming development and commercialization, AFT is expected to form part of the only vertically integrated nuclear fuel business of its kind in North America.

    HALEU Energy Fuel Inc. (HEF), a NANO Nuclear subsidiary, is focusing on the future development of a domestic source for a High-Assay, Low-Enriched Uranium (HALEU) fuel fabrication pipeline for NANO Nuclear’s own microreactors as well as the broader advanced nuclear reactor industry.

    NANO Nuclear Space Inc. (NNS), a NANO Nuclear subsidiary, is exploring the potential commercial applications of NANO Nuclear’s developing micronuclear reactor technology in space. NNS is focusing on applications such as the LOKI MMR system and other power systems for extraterrestrial projects and human sustaining environments, and potentially propulsion technology for long haul space missions. NNS’ initial focus will be on cis-lunar applications, referring to uses in the space region extending from Earth to the area surrounding the Moon’s surface.

    For more corporate information please visit: https://NanoNuclearEnergy.com/

    For further NANO Nuclear information, please contact:

    Email: IR@NANONuclearEnergy.com
    Business Tel: (212) 634-9206

    PLEASE FOLLOW OUR SOCIAL MEDIA PAGES HERE:

    NANO Nuclear Energy LINKEDIN

    NANO Nuclear Energy YOUTUBE

    NANO Nuclear Energy X PLATFORM

    Cautionary Note Regarding Forward Looking Statements

    This news release, the conference presentation described herein, and statements of NANO Nuclear’s management in connection with this news release contain or may contain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In this context, forward-looking statements mean statements related to future events, which may impact our expected future business and financial performance, and often contain words such as “expects”, “anticipates”, “intends”, “plans”, “believes”, “potential”, “will”, “should”, “could”, “would” or “may” and other words of similar meaning. These and other forward-looking statements are based on information available to us as of the date of this news release and represent management’s current views and assumptions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, events or results and involve significant known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may be beyond our control. For NANO Nuclear, particular risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual future results to differ materially from those expressed in our forward-looking statements include but are not limited to the following: (i) risks related to our U.S. Department of Energy (“DOE”) or related state or non-U.S. nuclear fuel licensing submissions, (ii) risks related the development of new or advanced technology and the acquisition of complimentary technology or businesses, including difficulties with design and testing, cost overruns, regulatory delays, integration issues and the development of competitive technology, (iii) our ability to obtain contracts and funding to be able to continue operations, (iv) risks related to uncertainty regarding our ability to technologically develop and commercially deploy a competitive advanced nuclear reactor or other technology in the timelines we anticipate, if ever, (v) risks related to the impact of U.S. and non-U.S. government regulation, policies and licensing requirements, including by the DOE and the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, including those associated with the recently enacted ADVANCE Act, and (vi) similar risks and uncertainties associated with the operating an early stage business a highly regulated and rapidly evolving industry. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which apply only as of the date of this news release. These factors may not constitute all factors that could cause actual results to differ from those discussed in any forward-looking statement, and NANO Nuclear therefore encourages investors to review other factors that may affect future results in its filings with the SEC, which are available for review at www.sec.gov and at https://ir.nanonuclearenergy.com/financial-information/sec-filings. Accordingly, forward-looking statements should not be relied upon as a predictor of actual results. We do not undertake to update our forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that may arise after the date of this news release, except as required by law.

    Attachment

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Security: Sextortionist Gets 24 Years for Victimizing Minors Online

    Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) State Crime Alerts (c)

    HOUSTON – A 22-year-old New York native has been sentenced for production of child pornography, coercion and enticement of minors and cyberstalking, announced U.S. Attorney Nicholas J. Ganjei.

    Tyler N. Grundstrom pleaded guilty Oct. 8, 2024.

    U.S. District Judge Andrew Hanen has now sentenced Grundstrom to a total of 288 months in federal prison. When he is eventually released, he will be on supervised release for the rest of his life, during which time he will have to comply with numerous requirements designed to restrict his access to children and the internet. Grundstrom will also be ordered to register as a sex offender.

    “The significant sentence in this case is a reminder of how seriously the Department of Justice takes the online victimization of minors,” said Ganjei. “Gone are the days where the predator lives next door or down the street; now a would-be exploiter can be thousands of miles away. Grundstrom, and similar online predators, are the reason why parents need to know who is talking to their child online.”

    “This case is a chilling reminder there are twisted criminals, like Tyler Grundstrom, who use the internet’s anonymity to manipulate children’s innocence for their own sick ends,” said FBI Houston Special Agent in Charge Douglas Williams. “I want to remind every child and parent to remain vigilant, especially on social media, because predators regularly use these platforms to find their victims. Today’s sentencing shows the FBI will relentlessly hunt down those who harm children, no matter where they live, and ensure they face the full force of the law for their vile crimes.”

    Grundstrom used popular online communication platforms to identify and target young girls for extortion and exploitation. Grundstrom would manipulate, threaten and coerce the victims into producing explicit and offensive content. The investigation revealed more than one victim in at least two states had been targeted, and the abuse occurred from 2021 and continued through 2022.

    He will remain in custody pending transfer to a U.S. Bureau of Prisons facility to be determined in the future.

    FBI Houston and FBI Atlanta’s Athens Resident Agency conducted the investigation.

    The case was brought as part of Project Safe Childhood (PSC), a nationwide initiative the Department of Justice (DOJ) launched in May 2006 to combat the growing epidemic of child sexual exploitation and abuse. U.S. Attorneys’ Offices and the Criminal Division’s Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section leads PSC, which marshals federal, state and local resources to locate, apprehend and prosecute individuals who sexually exploit children and identifies and rescues victims. For more information about PSC, please visit DOJ’s PSC page. For more information about internet safety education, please visit the resources link on that page.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: Brazilian Extradited From Switzerland to the United States to Face Indictment Charging Involvement in $290 Million Plus Cryptocurrency Fraud Scheme

    Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) State Crime News

    Tens of thousands of investors deposited bitcoin expecting an investment strategy – Instead, new investor bitcoin used to pay off other investors in a Ponzi scheme

    SEATTLE – A citizen of Brazil appeared in U.S. District Court in Seattle today, after being extradited from Switzerland to face a 13-count indictment for wire fraud and conspiracy regarding his bitcoin investment scheme, announced Acting U.S. Attorney Teal Luthy Miller. Douver T. Braga, 48, lived in Florida between approximately 2016 and 2021 during the bulk of the alleged fraud. The indictment alleges Braga operated a bitcoin investment scheme that was really a Ponzi scheme, as well as an illegal multilevel marketing scheme.

    The grand jury returned the indictment in October 2022. It was unsealed last week following Braga’s arrest in Switzerland. Today Braga pleaded “Not Guilty,” and trial was scheduled in front of U.S. District Judge Tana Lin on April 28, 2025.

    “Mr. Braga allegedly ran a fraud scheme that harkens back more than a century, but he updated his ‘Ponzi’ scheme with the hot new thing: bitcoin,” said U.S. Attorney Teal Luthy Miller. “The victim investors have waited years to see justice. I commend our federal partners at the FBI and IRS Criminal Investigation for their diligent work on this case.”

    According to the indictment, Braga conspired with others to create a cryptocurrency trading platform called Trade Coin Club (TCC) with an office in Belize. As early as 2016, Braga worked with others to promote TCC, claiming that investors would make money because the TCC had a sophisticated software program that allowed investors to profit on the fluctuating price of bitcoin. Braga also promised that investors could make money by referring other investors to the platform. In reality, there was no investment platform and no sophisticated software. Those who invested early were paid off by later investors as in a Ponzi scheme.

    Braga traveled the world promoting TCC: In Thailand in March 2017, in Nigeria and Macau in May 2017.  TCC was promoted on social media and in videos. At various events Braga claimed TCC had as many as 126,000 members in 231 different countries.

    Through his false promises of sophisticated investments and high returns, Braga induced tens of thousands of people to entrust over 82,000 bitcoin, valued at over $290 million at the time of investment, and to deposit it with TCC. Braga continued the false representations, creating an “online portal” where investors could track the supposed activity of their investment accounts. The site was a fiction as there was no trading activity.

    Braga withdrew and misappropriated investor funds. Between December 2016 and July 2019, at least $50 million in bitcoin was transferred to accounts Braga controlled.

    However, by late 2017 and early 2018, investors had trouble accessing their funds. In January 2018, TCC announced to investors that it was ceasing to operate in the United States and was cancelling their accounts.  Many investors were located in the Western District of Washington.

    Braga allegedly profited handsomely, while failing to report the earnings to the IRS. In 2017, he received bitcoin worth $30.5 million, but only reported income of $152, 298. In 2018, he reported $73,473 in income but got $13.1 million in bitcoin and in 2019, reported $72,870 in income while he received $10 million in bitcoin.

    “The type of scheme Mr. Braga is charged with operating is not new, he just used the allure of a flashy new technology to obscure the well-worn scam.” said W. Mike Herrington, Special Agent in Charge of the FBI’s Seattle field office. “While the victims in this case waited and wondered about the fate of their investments, he siphoned off millions of dollars for his personal use. This case demonstrates the determination of the FBI and our partners in IRS Criminal Investigation to hold fraudsters accountable, no matter where in the world they may be.”

    “The charges against Mr. Braga and his co-conspirators reflect a well-designed scheme to solicit investment in a fake cryptocurrency trading platform from victims around the globe,” said Special Agent in Charge Tyler Hatcher of IRS-Criminal Investigation (CI), Los Angeles Field Office.  “Furthermore, Mr. Braga is alleged to have knowingly ignored and circumvented laws regulating multi-level marketing programs in the U.S.- laws that exist to protect investors from becoming victims in pyramid schemes.  Despite the complexity of this scheme, IRS Criminal Investigation and our partners at the FBI successfully uncovered the evidence necessary to bring forth these charges.”

    Braga is charged with 12 counts of wire fraud reflecting 12 wires investors sent to TCC for deposits in their “accounts.” Braga is charged with one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud.

    The charges are punishable by up to 20 years in prison.

    The charges contained in the indictment are only allegations.  A person is presumed innocent unless and until he or she is proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.

    The case was investigated by the IRS-CI and the FBI.

    The case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Mike Dion and Phillip Kopczynski. The U.S. Department of Justice’s Office of International Affairs provided valuable assistance with securing the extradition.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI: No. 1/2025 – Financial calendar 2025/2026

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Nasdaq Copenhagen                                                                                   
    Nikolaj Plads 6
    DK-1067 Copenhagen K   

    Copenhagen, 24 February 2025
    ANNOUNCEMENT no. 1/2025

    FINANCIAL CALENDAR 2025/2026

    The financial calendar for 2025/2026 has been scheduled as follows:

    2025:                           

    25.02.2025  Annual Report 2024                           

    26.03.2025  Annual General Meeting

    27.08.2025 Interim Report, H1 2025                    

    2026:

    25.02.2026 Annual Report 2025                           

    25.03.2026  Annual General Meeting

    Cemat A/S 

    Frede Clausen
    Chairman of the Board

    This announcement has been prepared in a Danish-language and an English-language version. In case of doubt, the Danish version prevails.

    Attachment

    The MIL Network