Category: Intelligence Agencies

  • MIL-OSI Security: FBI Announces Nationwide Crackdown on South American Theft Groups

    Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation FBI Crime News (b)

    Through the coordinated efforts of the FBI Cincinnati, Newark and New York field offices, the FBI arrested Dimitriy “Russo” Nezhinskiy, owner and manager of Big Apple General Buyers, and Juan Villar, an employee, in Manhattan’s Diamond District. They are accused in the Eastern District of New York of running the largest east coast “fence”, which is a hub to resell stolen goods. Additionally, a federal grand jury in Cincinnati indicted three defendants believed to be operating as part of the organized group and charged them with transporting stolen goods interstate and falsifying records in a federal investigation. The three men allegedly committed a burglary at the home of an NFL player last year.

    In addition to high-end residential burglaries, SATGs are known to target traveling jewelry salesmen as they transport their inventory from location to location. They usually use facilitators, known as “fences,” to liquidate stolen merchandise. A fence is an individual or business who knowingly purchases stolen property and then resells it to others. In some scenarios, they send the stolen goods to Chile or Colombia. This week, a Chilean man, believed to be part of the South American Theft Group, was also charged for his involvement in a conspiracy to break into a jewelry store in New Jersey and then cross state lines with the stolen property.

    Crimes committed by South American Theft Groups can victimize anyone, not just professional athletes. The FBI has an initiative targeting SATGs, which involves individuals from Chile and other South American countries exploiting illegal entry or tourist visas to travel in and out of the U.S. to facilitate theft and transportation of stolen goods internationally. This initiative dedicates resources through various active investigations and major theft task forces, which include our state and local partners, throughout the country and shares intelligence with law enforcement partners around the world.

    You can visit tips.fbi.gov to report suspected South American Theft Group activity to the Bureau. Tips may be submitted anonymously.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: Bucks County Man Sentenced To 30 Months In Prison For Possession Of Unregistered Firearm

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    SCRANTON – The United States Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Pennsylvania announced that John Joseph Weikel, age 50, a resident of Quakertown, Pennsylvania was sentenced on February 6, 2025, to 30 months’ imprisonment by United States District Court Judge Julia K. Munley, for possession of an unregistered firearm.   

    According to Acting United States Attorney John C. Gurganus, on or about June 28, 2021, Weikel possessed two improvised explosive devices inside his former residence in Schuylkill County, Pennsylvania. After manufacturing the devices, Weikel concealed them behind the ceiling tiles in his apartment, abandoning them when he was evicted.  The devices were discovered on May 31, 2023, by maintenance workers.  Following their discovery, law enforcement agents disassembled the devices.  They were subsequently analyzed at the FBI Laboratory and identified improvised explosive devices.   Under federal law, it is illegal to manufacture or possess a destructive device without proper authority. 

    The investigation was conducted by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)—Allentown Field Office and the Pennsylvania State Police.  Assistant United States Attorney Tatum R. Wilson prosecuted the case.

     

    # # #

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: U.S. Attorney’s Office Charges Over 500 Individuals for Immigration-Related Criminal Conduct in Arizona

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    PHOENIX, Ariz. – During two weeks of enforcement operations from January 21, 2025, through February 3, 2025, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Arizona has brought immigration-related criminal charges against over 500 defendants. Specifically, the Office charged 565 defendants with immigration-related crimes. These cases were referred or supported by federal law enforcement partners, including Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s Enforcement and Removal Operations (ICE ERO), ICE Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), U.S. Border Patrol, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the U.S. Marshals Service (USMS), and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF).

    Apart from interdiction efforts at the border, Federal law enforcement has been prioritizing immigration enforcement operations and prosecutions of aliens unlawfully in the interior of the country who have connections to criminal activity in the United States, including those who commit drug and firearms crimes, who have serious criminal records, who have active warrants for their arrest, or who have outstanding final orders of removal from the United States issued by an immigration judge. Federal authorities have also been prioritizing investigations and prosecutions against drug, firearms, and alien smugglers and those who endanger and threaten the safety of  our communities and the law enforcement officers who protect us all.

    Recent matters of interest include:

    United States v. Edwin Santiago Marquez Flores: On January 27, 2025, Edwin Santiago Marquez Flores was under surveillance by HSI special agents on suspicion of engaging in human smuggling activity via social media. During a traffic stop, Marquez was found to be illegally in possession of two Century Arms AK47-style rifles, along with over $1,400 in U.S. currency. He was charged by criminal complaint with being an Alien in Possession of a Firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(5). Marquez admitted to being in the United States without legal status and admitted that he picked up the rifles with the intention that they be smuggled into Mexico. Marquez further admitted that he had sold approximately 50 firearms, including 40 to one specific individual who smuggles them to Mexico. He also admitted to transporting and selling cocaine in the United States and to coordinating approximately 300 drivers to smuggle approximately 800-1,000 illegal aliens within the United States. In total, Marquez said he was paid over $1.2 million for his smuggling activities. Case No. 25-3007 MJ.

    United States v. Jason Kyle Dunn: On January 31, 2025, Jason Kyle Dunn, a U.S. Citizen, was charged with smuggling aliens in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324. Dunn was encountered at a U.S. Border Patrol immigration checkpoint on Interstate 19, driving a Ford F-550. After a human-detecting canine alerted to the vehicle, aliens were found concealed inside toolboxes in the bed of the truck. Specifically, Border Patrol found one subject locked in the driver’s side toolbox, two locked in the passenger side toolbox, and three locked in the main toolbox. The smuggled aliens reported they had no way of opening the toolboxes from the inside and that they had been locked inside the toolboxes for up to two hours before being rescued by Border Patrol. Case No. 25-8428 MJ.

    United States v. Alfonso Garcia Vega: On February 2, 2025, ICE ERO Phoenix arrested Alfonso Garcia Vega, a Mexican citizen and criminal alien, who had previously been removed after a federal felony conviction and had unlawfully returned to the United States. Vega was charged by criminal complaint for illegal reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), as enhanced by 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) because of his prior felony convictions in the United States. Court papers in that prior case reflect that Garcia Vega’s criminal history includes DUIs, assault, illegal reentry, a drug trafficking offense, and misconduct involving weapons. See United States v. Alfonso Garcia-Vega, No. CR-19-00198-PHX-DLR. ICE ERO began its investigation in this matter based on a referral from ATF that Garcia Vega had previously attempted to illegally buy a firearm in the United States, and which purchase had been denied. Garcia Vega had been deported from the United States in 2020 pursuant to a final order of removal issued by an immigration judge after his 2019 federal felony conviction, for which he was sentenced to two years in custody. ICE officers attempted to consensually encounter and arrest Garcia Vega while he was on the sidewalk in front of his residence, but he fled into his residence in an attempt to avoid arrest. ICE ERO then obtained an arrest warrant to enter the residence. Case No. 25-3078 MJ.

    A criminal complaint is simply a method by which a person is charged with criminal activity and raises no inference of guilt. An individual is presumed innocent until evidence is presented to a jury that establishes guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

    CASE NUMBER:            25-3007 MJ       
                                          25-8428 MJ  
                                          25-3078 MJ                                       
    RELEASE NUMBER:    2025-014_Immmigration Enforcement

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: U.S. Attorney’s Office Returns $328,573 to Victim of Computer Support Scam

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    Marc H. Silverman, Acting United States Attorney for the District of Connecticut, and Michael J. Krol, Special Agent in Charge of Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), New England, today announced that the U.S. Attorney’s Office has returned approximately $328,573 to the victim of a computer support scam.

    A computer support scam is a type of fraud scheme where an alert appears on the victim’s computer imitating a customer support alert, tricking the victim into contacting the bad actors.  When the victim contacts the scammers, the scammers then take remote control of the computer and either directly transfer money from the victim to the scammers or trick the victim into sending money to the scammers.

    According to the complaint (3:24cv840), in February 2024, an elderly woman who was tricked by a computer support scheme that mimicked Microsoft customer support transferred approximately $550,000 to the scammers in two wire transfers.  Within two days of the transfers, the victim and a family member reported the incident to the Simsbury Police Department, who then partnered with HSI to investigate the crime.  Fortunately, one of the wire transfers, in the amount of $221,000, was reversed by the bank and returned to the victim.  HSI traced the remaining money, totaling approximately $328,573, and seized it.  The U.S. Attorney’s Office then filed a civil asset forfeiture action to forfeit the money to the government, and the U.S. Attorney’s Office and HSI then worked with the Department of Justice’s Money Laundering and Asset Recovery Section (MLARS) to return the money to the victim.  MLARS initiated the return of the money on February 4, 2025.

    Generally, the U.S. Attorney’s Office first forfeits the money, then returns it to the crime victims, so that the crime victims have clear title to the property without risk of further litigation.

    “The U.S. Attorney’s Office is committed to helping victims of crime, and civil asset forfeiture is a powerful tool that allows the government to return money to victims of fraud schemes,” said Acting U.S. Attorney Silverman.  “As we continue to pursue criminal prosecution of the individuals responsible for this and other computer crimes, it is equally important to ensure that the government uses all of its tools to minimize, and in this case, undo, the financial impact these crimes have on victims.  This case represents the best case scenario, where nearly every dollar taken from the victim was returned to her.  While it can be difficult to come forward and admit that you have been victimized by online scammers, know that federal law enforcement and our state and local partners stand ready to help you to the fullest extent possible.”

    “Cyber scams run by foreign malign actors are becoming more common and more sophisticated every day,” said HSI New England Special Agent in Charge Krol.  “The victim in this case contacted authorities quickly resulting in the recovery of most of her money by the bank and by HSI – a best case scenario and rare result.  It is essential for victims of these kinds of cybercrimes to come forward as soon as possible.  We want the public to know that help is available and to reach out immediately if they’ve been victimized by international scammers.”

    If you think you have been a victim of a computer support scam, immediately contact your bank or financial institution to request a recall or reversal as well as a Hold Harmless Letter or Letter of Indemnity, and contact local law enforcement.  Additionally, file a detailed complaint with the Internet Crime Complaint Center at www.ic3.gov.  The Internet Crime Complaint Center is run by the FBI and serves as the country’s hub for reporting cybercrime.  Visit www.ic3.gov for updated information regarding cyber fraud schemes.

    This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney David C. Nelson.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI: Track Group Reports 1st Quarter Fiscal 2025 Financial Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    NAPERVILLE, Ill., Feb. 07, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Track Group, Inc. (OTCQB: TRCK), a global leader in offender tracking and monitoring services, today announced financial results for its fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2024 (“Q1 FY25”). In Q1 FY25, the Company posted (i) total revenue of $8.7 Million (“M”), a decrease of approximately 3.3% over total revenue of $9.0M for the quarter ended December 31, 2023 (“Q1 FY24”); (ii) Q1 FY25 operating income of $0.1M compared to Q1 FY24 operating loss of ($0.2M); and (iii) net loss attributable to common shareholders of ($2.0M) in Q1 FY25 compared to net income attributable to common shareholders of $0.1M in Q1 FY24.

    “The quarter ending December 31, 2024 showed increases in gross profit, operating income and Adjusted EBITDA. This progress reflects the increased use of our products and services in legacy programs and continued expansion through newly awarded contracts domestically and abroad. With a strong pipeline and a commitment to delivering value, we are poised for continued success in fiscal year 2025,” said Derek Cassell, Track Group’s CEO. 

    FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

    • Total Q1 FY25 revenue of $8.7M decreased approximately 3.3% compared to Q1 FY24 revenue of $9.0M. The decrease in revenue was driven principally by a decrease in people assigned to monitoring for clients in Michigan and Virginia, and our recently sold Chilean subsidiary. This decrease was partially offset by revenue increases for clients in Illinois, Puerto Rico and the Bahamas who experienced increases in the number of people assigned to monitoring.
    • Gross profit of $4.4M in Q1 FY25 increased approximately 5.2% compared to Q1 FY24 gross profit of $4.2M due to a decrease in monitoring center costs, partially offset by a decrease in revenue.
    • Operating income in Q1 FY25 of $0.1M increased compared to the operating loss of ($0.2M) in Q1 FY24. The increase in net income in Q1 FY25 is primarily due to a decrease in cost of revenue and a decrease in operating expense.
    • Adjusted EBITDA for Q1 FY25 of $1.2M, increased compared to $1.1M for Q1 FY24 due to an increase in operating income and gross profit. Adjusted EBITDA in Q1 FY25 as a percentage of revenue increased to 14.4%, compared to 11.8% for Q1 FY24 for the same reasons.
    • Unrestricted cash balance of $3.7M for Q1 FY25 increased compared to $3.6M for Q1 FY24. The change in cash position was principally due to the sale of our Chilean subsidiary.
    • Net loss attributable to shareholders in FY24 was ($2,010,849) compared to net income of $461 in FY23, a change principally attributable to lower revenue and a foreign currency exchange rate loss.

    Business Outlook

    Growth in gross profit and operating income in Q1 FY25 reinforces our confidence in the strategic reinvestment in technology and the implementation of new programs initiated in late FY23. These endeavors position us well for sustained growth throughout FY25. As a result, the Company’s preliminary outlook for FY25 is as follows: 

      Actual     Outlook
      FY 2023     FY 2024     FY 2025
    Revenue: $34.5 M   $36.9 M   $35M  –  $36M
                   
    Adjusted EBITDA Margin: 11.1 %   14.6 %   14%  –  15%


    About Track Group, Inc.
    Track Group designs, manufactures, and markets location tracking devices; as well as develops and sells a variety of related software, services, and accessories, networking solutions, and monitoring applications. The Company’s products and services are designed to empower professionals in security, law enforcement, corrections, and rehabilitation organizations worldwide with single-sourced offender management solutions that integrate reliable intervention technologies to support re-socialization and monitoring initiatives.

    The Company currently trades under the ticker symbol “TRCK” on the OTCQB exchange. For more information, visit www.trackgrp.com.

    Forward-Looking Statements
    Any statements contained in this document that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements as defined in the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “forecast,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “project,” “predict,” “if”, “should” and “will” and similar expressions as they relate to Track Group, Inc., and subsidiaries (“Track Group”) are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These statements are only predictions and reflect Track Group’s current beliefs and expectations with respect to future events and are based on assumptions and subject to risks and uncertainties and subject to change at any time. Track Group may from time-to-time update these publicly announced projections, but it is not obligated to do so. Any projections of future results of operations should not be construed in any manner as a guarantee that such results will in fact occur. These projections are subject to change and could differ materially from final reported results. For a discussion of such risks and uncertainties, see “Risk Factors” in Track Group’s annual report on Form 10-K, its quarterly report on Form 10-Q, and its other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. New risks emerge from time to time. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the dates on which they are made.

    Non-GAAP Financial Measures
    This release includes financial measures defined as “non-GAAP financial measures” by the Securities and Exchange Commission including non-GAAP EBITDA. These measures may be different from non-GAAP financial measures used by other companies. The presentation of this financial information, which is not prepared under any comprehensive set of accounting rules or principles, is not intended to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for the financial information prepared and presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Reconciliations of these non-GAAP financial measures are based on the financial figures for the respective period.

    Non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA excludes items included but not limited to interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, impairment charges, gains and losses, currency effects, one-time charges or benefits that are not indicative of operations, charges to consolidate, integrate or consider recently acquired businesses, costs of closing facilities, stock based or other non-cash compensation or other stated cash and non-cash charges (the “Adjustments”).

    The Company believes the non-GAAP measures provide useful information to both management and investors when factoring in the Adjustments. Specific disclosure regarding the Company’s financial results, including management’s analysis of results from operations and financial condition, are contained in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2023, and other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Investors are encouraged to carefully read and consider such disclosure and analysis contained in the Company’s Form 10-K and other reports, including the risk factors contained in such Form 10-K.

    TRACK GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
     
      (Unaudited)          
      December 31,     September 30,  
      2024     2024  
    Assets              
    Current assets:              
    Cash $ 3,740,043     $ 3,574,215  
    Accounts receivable, net of allowance for credit losses of $525,141 and $432,904 respectively   5,319,041       4,428,535  
    Prepaid expense and deposits   420,680       638,293  
    Inventory, net of reserves of $99,041 and $82,848, respectively   811,992       582,481  
    Assets held for sale         969,481  
    Total current assets   10,291,756       10,193,005  
    Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $293,419 and $430,003, respectively   351,353       317,206  
    Monitoring equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $5,145,204 and $5,982,972, respectively   4,550,033       4,598,864  
    Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $19,954,086 and $19,699,966, respectively   13,415,776       13,959,571  
    Goodwill   7,913,369       7,941,190  
    Other assets, net   1,238,608       660,170  
    Total assets $ 37,760,895     $ 37,670,006  
                   
    Liabilities and StockholdersEquity (Deficit)              
    Current liabilities:              
    Accounts payable $ 3,336,084     $ 3,082,467  
    Accrued liabilities   2,542,932       2,639,318  
    Liabilities held for sale         732,028  
    Total current liabilities   5,879,016       6,453,813  
    Long-term debt, net of current portion   42,659,634       42,639,197  
    Long-term liabilities   679,823       186,407  
    Total liabilities   49,218,473       49,279,417  
                   
    Stockholdersequity (deficit):              
    Common stock, $0.0001 par value: 30,000,000 shares authorized; 11,863,758 and 11,863,758 shares outstanding, respectively   1,186       1,186  
    Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value: 20,000,000 shares authorized; 0 shares outstanding          
    Series A Convertible Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value: 1,200,000 shares authorized; 0 shares outstanding          
    Paid in capital   302,600,546       302,600,546  
    Accumulated deficit   (315,274,178 )     (312,691,811 )
    Accumulated other comprehensive loss   1,214,868       (1,519,332 )
    Total equity (deficit)   (11,457,578 )     (11,609,411 )
    Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficit) $ 37,760,895     $ 37,670,006  
    TRACK GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME/(LOSS)
    (Unaudited)
     
      Three Months Ended
    December 31,
     
      2024     2023  
    Revenue:              
    Monitoring and other related services $ 8,441,307     $ 8,674,485  
    Product sales and other   227,021       292,487  
    Total revenue   8,668,328       8,966,972  
                   
    Cost of revenue:              
    Monitoring, products and other related services   3,508,762       3,973,989  
    Depreciation and amortization included in cost of revenue   735,224       789,463  
    Total cost of revenue   4,243,986       4,763,452  
                   
    Gross profit   4,424,342       4,203,520  
                   
    Operating expense:              
    General & administrative   2,431,118       2,757,887  
    Selling & marketing   901,189       706,531  
    Research & development   669,391       682,463  
    Depreciation & amortization   227,553       239,760  
    Loss on sale of subsidiary   66,483        
    Total operating expense   4,295,734       4,386,641  
                   
    Operating income (loss)   128,608       (183,121 )
                   
    Other income (expense):              
    Interest income   2,839       48,162  
    Interest expense   (571,798 )     (486,084 )
    Currency exchange rate gain (loss)   (1,499,262 )     538,945  
    Total other income (expense)   (2,068,221 )     101,023  
    Net income (loss) before income taxes   (1,939,613 )     (82,098 )
    Income tax expense (benefit)   71,236       (82,559 )
    Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders   (2,010,849 )     461  
    Release of cumulative translation adjustment for sale of subsidiary   1,390,913        
    Equity adjustment for sale of subsidiary   571,518        
    Foreign currency translation adjustments   771,769       (106,702 )
    Comprehensive income (loss) $ 723,351     $ (106,241 )
    Net income (loss) per sharebasic:              
    Net income (loss) per common share $ (0.17 )   $ 0.00  
    Weighted average common shares outstanding   11,863,758       11,863,758  
                   
    Net income (loss) per sharediluted:              
    Net income (loss) per common share $ (0.17 )   $ 0.00  
    Weighted average common shares outstanding   11,863,758       11,863,758  
    TRACK GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    NON-GAAP ADJUSTED EBITDA DECEMBER 31 (UNAUDITED)
    (amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)
     
      Three Months Ended
    December 31,
     
      2024     2023  
                   
    Non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA              
    Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders $ (2,011 )   $  
    Interest expense, net   569       438  
    Depreciation and amortization   963       1,029  
    Income taxes (1)   71       (83 )
    Board compensation and stock-based compensation   75       53  
    Foreign exchange expense (gain)   1,499       (539 )
    Loss on sale of subsidiary   66        
    Other charges (2)   18       164  
    Total Non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA $ 1,250     $ 1,062  
    Non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA, percent of revenue   14.4 %     11.8 %
                   
    Non-GAAP earnings per sharebasic:              
    Weighted average common shares outstanding   11,863,758       11,863,758  
    Non-GAAP earnings per share $ 0.11     $ 0.09  
                   
    Non-GAAP earnings per sharediluted:              
    Weighted average common shares outstanding   11,863,758       11,863,758  
    Non-GAAP earnings per share $ 0.11     $ 0.09  
      (1 ) Currently, the Company has significant U.S. tax loss carryforwards that may be used to offset future taxable income, subject to IRS limitations. However, the Company is still subject to certain state, commonwealth, and other foreign based taxes.
           
      (2 ) Other charges are expenses related to the board of directors, severance, and other Chile monitoring center costs for our recently sold subsidiary.

    James Berg
    Chief Financial Officer
    jim.berg@trackgrp.com

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Security: Defense News: Collaboration in Action: First Responders and Military Train for Crisis Situations

    Source: United States Navy

    NORFOLK, Va. — On February 5, 2025, a multi-agency exercise simulating an active shooter scenario and improvised explosive device (IED) threat took place in Naval Support Activity (NSA) Hampton Roads Iowa Estates. The drill was designed to test the readiness and coordination of various local and federal agencies, enhancing their ability to respond to complex, high-stress situations. The exercise was a collaborative effort involving Navy Police, Norfolk Police, Norfolk Fire, Navy Region Mid-Atlantic Fire, Naval Criminal Investigative Service (NCIS), and Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD).

    “Exercises like this are critical in ensuring our personnel are prepared for real-world threats. The collaboration between multiple agencies strengthens our ability to respond effectively and keep our communities safe,” said Captain Mathew Olson, NSA Hampton Roads Commanding Officer.

    The exercise began with a simulated active shooter incident at Iowa Estates. The scenario unfolded when a suspect entered the area and began firing shots. Navy Police quickly responded, pursuing the suspect into the residential area. During the pursuit, officers encountered a suspected IED, adding an additional layer of urgency and complexity to the situation. The discovery prompted an immediate shift in tactics, requiring coordination with EOD specialists to assess and neutralize the threat while law enforcement continued their response.

    Following a brief chase, the suspect barricaded himself in his vehicle, prompting a tactical response from the involved agencies. In response to the evolving situation, NCIS took charge of negotiations with the suspect in an attempt to resolve the standoff peacefully. The standoff lasted just under two hours, allowing participants to refine and assess their protocols for crisis management, communication, and the coordination of multiple teams.

    The primary aim of the exercise was to provide participating agencies with an opportunity to experience “real-world” training, enabling them to sharpen their response times, improve tactical strategies, and ensure the safety of both law enforcement personnel and the public.

    “The more we train together, the better prepared we are. These scenarios push us to refine our strategies and ensure that when a real crisis occurs, we’re ready to respond with precision and professionalism,” said Lieutenant Shawn Watkins, NSA Hampton Roads Security Officer.

    The scenarios emphasized the importance of clear communication between the agencies involved, allowing for effective coordination. Fire departments were also instrumental, responding to potential hazards and ensuring the safety of all responders, while EOD teams worked swiftly to evaluate and neutralize the IED threat, preventing further escalation.

    This training allowed personnel to practice both offensive and defensive tactics, developing their ability to work together under high pressure. The simulation also tested the agencies’ capacity to maintain situational awareness, handle negotiations, and defuse a dangerous situation in a timely manner.

    The exercise underscored the importance of a unified approach when responding to critical incidents. With a combination of law enforcement, fire, medical, and military personnel, the agencies worked seamlessly to bring the exercise to a successful conclusion. The integration of different units—from police negotiators to fire response teams—demonstrated the value of multi-agency collaboration in safeguarding public safety during complex emergencies.

    “At the end of the day, everything we do is about protecting lives. This exercise allowed us to test and improve our skills so that if the worst happens, we can respond swiftly and effectively,” said Captain Olson.

    Moving forward, the lessons learned during this event will serve as a foundation for future training exercises and real-world responses, ensuring that all participants remain prepared to protect and serve with the highest level of professionalism and efficiency.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Economics: ICC and Palestine Emerging continue to promote economic opportunity in the Middle East 

    Source: International Chamber of Commerce

    Headline: ICC and Palestine Emerging continue to promote economic opportunity in the Middle East 

    A second meeting of the ICC-Palestine Emerging Steering Committee was held virtually on 7 February, marking a progress-tracking milestone since the collaboration was announced in October 2024. With a focus on the economic development and reconstruction of Gaza and the West Bank, the ICC-Palestine Emerging partnership works to promote strong private sectors across the Middle East.

    Another key achievement has been the formal affiliation of the Federation of Palestinian Chambers of Commerce, Industry and Agriculture (FPCCIA) with the ICC World Chambers Federation. The affiliation will allow Palestinian companies to participate in ICC’s global business events and to gain international market access. It will also provide Palestinian companies with direct access to ICC OneClick, ICC’s gateway supporting SMEs in their export journey, now available in Arabic.

    ICC Secretary General, John W.H. Denton AO said:

    By combining the breadth and credibility of ICC’s network and expertise with Palestine Emerging’s local insights, this collaboration will continue to foster Palestine’s engagement with the global economy with integrity

    The ICC-Palestine Emerging partnership has identified 15 workstreams aimed at growing the Palestinian economy, and the Middle East region at large. These include concrete initiatives to strengthen the Palestinian private sector’s involvement with ICC’s global network, including through the establishment of a new national committee.

    ICC is working closely with Palestine Emerging to promote the Palestinian entrepreneurship ecosystem by facilitating engagement between local startups, education institutions and international investors. The initiative also aims to enhance investment attraction efforts and support economic reconstruction, including by developing local arbitration capabilities and bringing ICC’s alternative dispute resolution services to Palestine.

    Senior ICC representatives have actively engaged in Palestine Emerging activities. These include joint events with the United States Institute of Peace in Washington D.C. in December 2024 and the Palestine Emerging International Advisory Group meeting in London in January 2025.

    ICC and Palestine Emerging have secured support from key international players for these joint initiatives through engagement with key government and business leaders.

    As momentum builds, ICC and Palestine Emerging’s collaboration will continue to drive economic opportunity and integration for Palestinian businesses with the global economy.

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Council launches public consultation for Performance Improvement Objectives

    Source: Northern Ireland City of Armagh

    Armagh City, Banbridge and Craigavon Borough Council has launched a public consultation process aimed at gathering views on its proposed Performance Improvement Objectives for 2025-26.

    From Thursday 06 February to Thursday 03 April 2025, members of the public are invited to complete a short online survey to share their thoughts and opinions on the following proposed objectives:

    • We will reduce the average number of days’ sickness absence lost per employee.
    • We will reduce council’s environmental impact through the development and implementation of a Climate and Sustainability Action Plan.
    • We will improve our waste management services through the implementation of technological solutions and continued communication.
    • We will improve communications with our customers on council services and responsibilities.

    Commenting on the public consultation, Lord Mayor of Armagh City, Banbridge and Craigavon, Councillor Sarah Duffy, said:

    “Each year our council is required to set objectives for improving how it carries out its functions and to put in place arrangements to help promote sustainable and continuous improvements in its service delivery. To help us achieve this, we are welcoming comments on our proposed Performance Improvement Objectives for 2025-26.

     “For our council to be effective, it is important that as many members of the local community offer feedback on these proposed objectives to ensure they reflect those views and address the needs of customers, residents and communities across the entire borough.”


    To complete the survey and view related documents for the proposed Performance Improvement Objectives before Thursday 03 April, click here.

    Should you wish to receive the document in hard copy or an alternative format, please contact the council’s Performance Team on 0300 0300 900 or email

    *protected email*

    .

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI Security: ‘Be Smart with Your Kid’s Smartphone’ Coming to Clay County

    Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation FBI Crime News (b)

    FBI, Clay County Sherriff’s Office and Clay County Schools Partner at Ridgeview High School

    JACKSONVILLE, FL—FBI Jacksonville will partner with the Clay County Sheriff’s Office and Clay County District Schools to host “Be Smart with your Kid’s Smartphone” on Thursday, February 27. The event will be held at Ridgeview High School and is free and open to all parents, guardians, and educators. Since 2018, over 3,000 child advocates have attended “Be Smart” events across northeast Florida to learn how to better protect youth from being targeted online by predators and extremists.

    “Be Smart with your Kids’ Smartphone” events are led by Special Agents from FBI Jacksonville who investigate crimes against children and terrorism matters. Together with deputies from the Clay County Sheriff’s Office, they will review the latest social media apps that offenders are using to target and manipulate local kids and provide an overview of schemes that specifically target teens. Please note that the content of these presentations may not be appropriate for youth, and parental discretion is advised.

    • Event: “Be Smart with your Kid’s Smartphone – Parent Edition” Where: Ridgeview High School, 466 Madison Avenue, Orange Park, Florida, 32065
    • When: Thursday, February 27, 2025, 6:30 – 8:00 p.m.
    • Who: Free and open to parents and educators from all schools and districts.
    • Notes: Seating is limited. Registration is highly suggested.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: Stamford Man Sentenced to More Than Six Years in Federal Prison for Robbing Three Banks in 2020

    Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) State Crime News

    Marc H. Silverman, Acting United States Attorney for the District of Connecticut, announced that FRANCESCO PENSIERO, also known as Frank Pensiero, 52, of Stamford, was sentenced today by U.S. District Judge Victor A. Bolden in New Haven to 78 months of imprisonment, followed by three years of supervised release, for robbing three Connecticut banks in 2020.

    According to court documents and statements made in court, on October 13, 2020, Pensiero and an associate robbed the Chase Bank located at 2855 Main Street in Stratford.  During the robbery, Pensiero’s associate displayed a handgun on the teller counter and presented the teller with a note that read “this is a robbery give me all your money.”  The teller provided Pensiero’s associate with approximately $1,000 and Pensiero and his associate exited the bank.

    Later on October 13, 2020, Pensiero robbed the People’s United Bank located at 1160 Kings Highway Cutoff in Fairfield.  During the robbery, he pulled out a handgun and presented the teller a note that stated “This is a robbery.”  The teller provided Pensiero with $5,458 and Pensiero exited the bank.

    On October 28, 2020, Pensiero and his associate robbed the People’s United Bank located at 95 Main Street in New Canaan.  Pensiero displayed a handgun, provided the teller with a note demanding money, verbally threatened to kill the teller and other employees, and ordered the bank employees to lie on the floor.  Pensiero and his associate stole $9,130 during the robbery, and fled from the bank in a red Chevrolet Monte Carlo SS.  The following day, the car was set on fire on Green Avenue in New Canaan.

    Pensiero was arrested on a federal criminal complaint on January 27, 2023.  On June 3, 2024, he pleaded guilty to bank robbery.

    Pensiero’s criminal history includes convictions for bank robbery and other offenses.

    Pensiero’s associate was convicted of related state offenses stemming from these robberies.

    This investigation was conducted by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Stratford, Fairfield, and New Canaan Police Departments.  The case was prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Daniel P. Gordon.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: Raleigh County Man Pleads Guilty to Money Laundering

    Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) State Crime News

    BECKLEY, W.Va. – James E. Monroe Jr., 59, of Daniels, pleaded guilty today to money laundering.

    According to court documents and statements made in court, on February 25, 2022, Monroe filed a petition for personal bankruptcy. Monroe knew he was required to submit true and correct schedules listing his assets and a statement detailing his financial affairs as part of the bankruptcy process. Monroe admitted that he sold his collection of over 10,000 sports trading cards after filing for bankruptcy and without disclosing its existence or its post-petition sale in the bankruptcy filings as required. Monroe further admitted that he sold the collection to a friend online to convert the collection into cash and disguise the nature of the resulting proceeds.

    Monroe admitted that his asset schedules and statement of financial affairs also did not disclose the December 2021 sale of his marital home in the Glade Springs residential development for $525,000, or the existence of a retirement account, two loans he obtained by using the equity associated with his whole-life insurance policy as collateral, and a storage unit he rented in the Shady Spring area that contained property belonging to the bankruptcy estate. Monroe further admitted that his schedules falsely stated that his then-minor daughter lived with him and was his dependent when neither was true.

    Monroe is scheduled to be sentenced on May 15, 2025, and faces a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison, up to three years of supervised release, and a $500,000 fine.

    United States Attorney Will Thompson made the announcement and commended the investigative work of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). The United States Trustee’s Charleston field office, which serves West Virginia, made the criminal referral of this case to the U.S. Attorney’s Office. The United States Trustee Program is a component of the Department of Justice whose mission is to promote the integrity and efficiency of the bankruptcy system for the benefit of all stakeholders — debtors, creditors and the public.

    United States Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn presided over the hearing. Assistant United States Attorney Jonathan T. Storage is prosecuting the case.

    A copy of this press release is located on the website of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of West Virginia. Related court documents and information can be found on PACER by searching for Case No. 5:24-cr-121.

    ###

     

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: Louisiana Doctor Sentenced for Illegally Distributing Over 1.8 Million Doses of Opioids in $5.4 Million Health Care Fraud Scheme

    Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) State Crime Alerts (b)

    A Louisiana physician was sentenced yesterday to 87 months in prison for conspiring to illegally distribute over 1.8 million doses of Schedule II controlled substances, including oxycodone, hydrocodone, and morphine, and for defrauding health care benefit programs of more than $5.4 million.

    According to court documents and evidence presented at trial, Adrian Dexter Talbot M.D., 59, of Slidell, owned and operated Medex Clinical Consultants (Medex), located in Slidell. Medex was a medical clinic that accepted cash payments from individuals seeking prescriptions for Schedule II controlled substances. Talbot routinely ignored signs that individuals frequenting Medex were drug-seeking or abusing the drugs prescribed. In 2015, Talbot took a full-time job in Pineville, Louisiana, and although he was no longer physically present at the Slidell clinic, he pre-signed prescriptions, including for opioids and other controlled substances, to be distributed to individuals there whom he did not see or examine. In 2016, Talbot hired another practitioner who, at Talbot’s direction, also pre-signed prescriptions to be distributed to individuals in exchange for cash deposited into a Medex bank account. The evidence also demonstrated that Talbot falsified patient records to cover up the scheme and to make it appear as though he was routinely examining the patients. With Talbot’s knowledge, these individuals filled their prescriptions using their insurance benefits, thereby causing health care benefit programs, including Medicare, Medicaid, and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Louisiana, to be fraudulently billed for controlled substances that were prescribed without an appropriate patient examination or determination of medical necessity.

    On July 22, 2024, Talbot was convicted by a jury in the Eastern District of Louisiana of one count of conspiracy to unlawfully distribute and dispense controlled substances, four counts of unlawfully distributing and dispensing controlled substances, one count of maintaining a drug-involved premises, and one count of conspiracy to commit health care fraud.

    Supervisory Official Antoinette T. Bacon of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Louisiana, Special Agent in Charge Jason E. Meadows of the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (HHS-OIG), Special Agent in Charge Kris Raper of the Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Inspector General (VA-OIG)’s South Central Field Office, Assistant Director Chad Yarbrough of the FBI’s Criminal Investigative Division, Acting Special Agent in Charge Stephen A. Cyrus of the FBI New Orleans Field Office, and Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill made the announcement.

    HHS-OIG, VA-OIG, FBI, and the Louisiana Medicaid Fraud Control Unit investigated the case.

    Trial Attorneys Sara E. Porter and Gary A. Crosby II, Assistant Chief Justin Woodard, and Deputy Chief Kate Payerle of the Criminal Division’s Fraud Section prosecuted the case.

    The Fraud Section leads the Criminal Division’s efforts to combat health care fraud through the Health Care Fraud Strike Force Program. Since March 2007, this program, currently comprised of nine strike forces operating in 27 federal districts, has charged more than 5,400 defendants who collectively have billed federal health care programs and private insurers more than $27 billion. In addition, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, working in conjunction with HHS-OIG, are taking steps to hold providers accountable for their involvement in health care fraud schemes. More information can be found at www.justice.gov/criminal-fraud/health-care-fraud-unit. 

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI: Tenable Completes Acquisition of Vulcan Cyber

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    COLUMBIA, Md., Feb. 07, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Tenable® Holdings, Inc., (“Tenable”) (Nasdaq: TENB) the exposure management company, today announced it has closed its acquisition of Vulcan Cyber Ltd., (“Vulcan Cyber”), a leading innovator in exposure management.

    Vulcan Cyber’s capabilities will enhance Tenable’s industry-leading Exposure Management platform, delivering comprehensive visibility, prioritization and remediation across the entire attack surface.

    “As we welcome our new team members to Tenable, we will immediately begin working on the integration process to drive expanded data insights that will better prioritize risks and simplify remediation efforts for our customers,” said Steve Vintz, Co-CEO and CFO, Tenable. “This move accelerates our exposure management vision, which we believe will set a new standard for accuracy in risk mitigation in the industry.”

    With enhanced visibility, extended third-party data flows, superior risk prioritization, and automated remediation, Tenable One will consolidate and aggregate vast amounts of data into one of the most comprehensive Exposure Management platforms available on the market. This will empower organizations to confidently reduce risk across their entire environment.

    Financial Outlook

    Our financial outlook below reflects the impact of Vulcan Cyber.

    For the first quarter of 2025, we currently expect:

    • Revenue in the range of $233.0 million to $235.0 million.
    • Non-GAAP income from operations in the range of $40.0 million to $42.0 million.
    • Non-GAAP net income in the range of $32.0 million to $34.0 million, assuming interest income of $3.8 million, interest expense of $7.0 million and a provision for income taxes of $3.6 million.
    • Non-GAAP diluted earnings per share in the range of $0.26 to $0.27.
    • 124.0 million diluted weighted average shares outstanding.

    For the year ending December 31, 2025, we currently expect:

    • Calculated current billings in the range of $1.045 billion to $1.060 billion.
    • Revenue in the range of $975.0 million to $985.0 million.
    • Non-GAAP income from operations in the range of $205.0 million to $215.0 million.
    • Non-GAAP net income in the range of $175.0 million to $185.0 million, assuming interest income of $15.3 million, interest expense of $28.3 million and a provision for income taxes of $13.4 million.
    • Non-GAAP diluted earnings per share in the range of $1.41 to $1.49.
    • 124.5 million diluted weighted average shares outstanding.
    • Unlevered free cash flow in the range of $265.0 million to $275.0 million.

    Additional Resources

    • Read today’s blog post on the acquisition here.
    • Request a demo of Tenable One.

    About Tenable
    Tenable® is the exposure management company, exposing and closing the cybersecurity gaps that erode business value, reputation and trust. The company’s AI-powered exposure management platform radically unifies security visibility, insight and action across the attack surface, equipping modern organizations to protect against attacks from IT infrastructure to cloud environments to critical infrastructure and everywhere in between. By protecting enterprises from security exposure, Tenable reduces business risk for approximately 44,000 customers around the globe. Learn more at tenable.com.

    Forward-Looking Statements
    This press release contains forward-looking information related to Tenable, and its acquisition of Vulcan Cyber Ltd. that involves substantial risks, uncertainties and assumptions that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such statements. You can generally identify forward-looking statements by the use of forward-looking terminology such as the words: “anticipate,” “believe,” “continue,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “explore,” “evaluate,” “intend,” “may,” “might,” “plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “seek,” “should,” or “will,” or the negative thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology. The forward-looking statements in this press release are based on Tenable’s current plans, objectives, estimates, expectations and intentions and inherently involve significant risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond Tenable’s control. Forward-looking statements in this communication include, among other things, statements regarding the impact of the Vulcan Cyber acquisition on our future results of operations and financial position, statements about the potential benefits of the acquisition and product developments and other possible or assumed business strategies, potential growth opportunities, new products, potential market opportunities, and the anticipated timing of the closing of the acquisition. Risks and uncertainties include, among other things, our ability to successfully integrate Vulcan Cyber’s operations; our ability to implement our plans, expectations with respect to Vulcan Cyber’s business; our ability to realize the anticipated benefits of the acquisition, including the possibility that the expected benefits from the acquisition will not be realized or will not be realized within the expected time period; disruption from the acquisition making it more difficult to maintain business and operational relationships; the inability to retain key employees; the negative effects of the consummation of the acquisition on the market price of our common stock or on our operating results; unknown liabilities; attracting new customers and maintaining and expanding our existing customer base; our ability to scale and update our platform to respond to customers’ needs and rapid technological change, increased competition on our market and our ability to compete effectively, and expansion of our operations and increased adoption of our platform internationally.

    Additional risks and uncertainties that could affect our financial results are included in the section titled “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023, our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2024 and other filings that we make from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) which are available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. In addition, any forward-looking statements contained in this communication are based on assumptions that we believe to be reasonable as of this date. Except as required by law, we assume no obligation to update these forward-looking statements, or to update the reasons if actual results differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements.

    Contact Information

    Investor Relations
    investors@tenable.com

    Media Relations
    Tenable
    tenablepr@tenable.com

    RECONCILIATION OF GAAP TO NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

    The following adjustments to reconcile forecasted non-GAAP income from operations, non-GAAP net income, non-GAAP earnings per share, free cash flow and unlevered free cash flow are subject to a number of uncertainties and assumptions, each of which are inherently difficult to forecast. As a result, actual adjustments and GAAP results may differ materially.

    Forecasted Non-GAAP Income from Operations Three Months Ending
    March 31, 2025
      Year Ending
    December 31, 2025
    (in millions) Low   High   Low   High
    Forecasted loss from operations $ (27.0 )   $ (25.0 )   $ (21.0 )   $ (11.0 )
    Forecasted stock-based compensation   55.0       55.0       195.0       195.0  
    Forecasted acquisition-related expenses   6.0       6.0       6.0       6.0  
    Forecasted amortization of acquired intangible assets   6.0       6.0       25.0       25.0  
    Forecasted non-GAAP income from operations $ 40.0     $ 42.0     $ 205.0     $ 215.0  
    Forecasted Non-GAAP Net Income and Non-GAAP Earnings Per Share Three Months Ending
    March 31, 2025
      Year Ending
    December 31, 2025
    (in millions, except per share data) Low   High   Low   High
    Forecasted net loss(1) $ (36.0 )   $ (34.0 )   $ (56.0 )   $ (46.0 )
    Forecasted stock-based compensation   55.0       55.0       195.0       195.0  
    Forecasted tax impact of stock-based compensation   1.0       1.0       5.0       5.0  
    Forecasted acquisition-related expenses   6.0       6.0       6.0       6.0  
    Forecasted amortization of acquired intangible assets   6.0       6.0       25.0       25.0  
    Forecasted non-GAAP net income $ 32.0     $ 34.0     $ 175.0     $ 185.0  
                   
    Forecasted net loss per share, diluted(1) $ (0.30 )   $ (0.28 )   $ (0.46 )   $ (0.38 )
    Forecasted stock-based compensation   0.46       0.46       1.61       1.61  
    Forecasted tax impact of stock-based compensation   0.01       0.01       0.04       0.04  
    Forecasted acquisition-related expenses   0.05       0.05       0.05       0.05  
    Forecasted amortization of acquired intangible assets   0.05       0.05       0.21       0.21  
    Adjustment to diluted earnings per share(2)   (0.01 )     (0.02 )     (0.04 )     (0.04 )
    Forecasted non-GAAP earnings per share, diluted $ 0.26     $ 0.27     $ 1.41     $ 1.49  
                   
    Forecasted weighted-average shares used to compute GAAP net loss per share, diluted   120.5       120.5       121.0       121.0  
    Forecasted weighted-average shares used to compute non-GAAP earnings per share, diluted   124.0       124.0       124.5       124.5  

    ________________
    (1)  The forecasted GAAP net loss assumes income tax expense of $4.6 million and $18.4 million in the three months ending March 31, 2025 and year ending December 31, 2025, respectively.

    (2)  Adjustment to reconcile GAAP net loss per share, which excludes potentially dilutive shares, to non-GAAP earnings per share, which includes potentially dilutive shares.

       
    Forecasted Free Cash Flow and Unlevered Free Cash Flow Year Ending
    December 31, 2025
    (in millions) Low   High
    Forecasted net cash provided by operating activities $ 258.0     $ 268.0  
    Forecasted purchases of property and equipment   (17.0 )     (17.0 )
    Forecasted capitalized software development costs   (3.0 )     (3.0 )
    Forecasted free cash flow   238.0       248.0  
    Forecasted cash paid for interest and other financing costs   27.0       27.0  
    Forecasted unlevered free cash flow $ 265.0     $ 275.0  

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: Plains All American Reports Fourth-Quarter and Full-Year 2024 Results; Provides Update on Efficient Growth Initiatives and Announces 2025 Guidance

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    HOUSTON, Feb. 07, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. (Nasdaq: PAA) and Plains GP Holdings (Nasdaq: PAGP) today reported fourth-quarter and full-year 2024 results, announced 2025 guidance and provided the following highlights:

    2024 Results

    • Fourth-quarter and full-year 2024 Net income attributable to PAA of $36 million and $772 million, respectively, and 2024 Net cash provided by operating activities of $726 million and $2.49 billion, respectively
    • Delivered strong fourth-quarter and full-year 2024 Adjusted EBITDA attributable to PAA above the top-end of guidance with $729 million and $2.78 billion, respectively
    • Generated full-year 2024 Adjusted Free Cash Flow (excluding changes in Assets & Liabilities; including impact from legal settlements) of $1.17 billion and exited the year with leverage at 3.0x
    • Net income for the quarter includes the impact of a $225 million charge resulting from the write-off of a receivable for Line 901 insurance proceeds and $140 million of non-cash charges related to the write-down of two U.S. NGL terminals

    Efficient Growth Initiatives

    • Closed all three previously announced bolt-on acquisitions for approximately $670 million net to PAA, including the acquisition of Ironwood Midstream Energy
    • Closed on previously announced purchase of approximately 12.7 million units, or 18%, of its Series A Preferred Units for a purchase price of approximately $330 million
    • Continue pursuing a long runway of synergistic and strong return bolt-on opportunities across the asset footprint

    2025 Outlook

    • Expect full-year 2025 Adjusted EBITDA attributable to PAA of $2.80 – $2.95 billion
    • Announced distribution increase of $0.25 per unit payable February 14, 2025, representing a 20% aggregate increase in the annualized distribution versus 2024 levels (new annual distribution of $1.52 per unit)
    • In January, successfully raised $1 billion in aggregate senior unsecured notes at 5.95% due 2035
    • Anticipate leverage ratio to be at or below the low-end of leverage target range of 3.25x to 3.75x, continuing to provide significant balance sheet optionality and flexibility
    • Expect to generate approximately $1.15 billion of Adjusted Free Cash Flow (excluding changes in Assets & Liabilities), which is reduced by approximately $580 million for previously announced bolt-on transactions closed in the first quarter
    • Remain focused on disciplined capital investments, anticipating full-year 2025 Growth Capital of +/- $400 million and Maintenance Capital of +/- $240 million net to PAA

    “We continue delivering strong financial and operating results and increasing return of capital to unitholders. As evidenced by our recently announced acquisitions, we have the ability to leverage our integrated asset base and financial strength to drive accretive transactions and deliver value to our customers and unitholders,” said Plains Chairman and CEO Willie Chiang. “We remain confident entering 2025, with strong operational momentum and focus on executing our efficient growth strategy. Our strong performance and positive outlook combined with the contribution from recent bolt-on acquisitions continues driving meaningful cash flow and underpins increasing returns to unitholders all while maintaining capital discipline and financial flexibility.”

    Plains All American Pipeline

    Summary Financial Information (unaudited)
    (in millions, except per unit data)

        Three Months Ended
    December 31,
      %     Twelve Months Ended
    December 31,
      %
    GAAP Results   2024   2023
      Change     2024
      2023
      Change
    Net income attributable to PAA   $ 36     $ 312       (88 )%     $ 772     $ 1,230       (37 )%
    Diluted net income/(loss) per common unit   $ (0.04 )   $ 0.35       (111 )%     $ 0.73     $ 1.40       (48 )%
    Diluted weighted average common units outstanding     704       701       %       702       699       %
    Net cash provided by operating activities   $ 726     $ 1,011       (28 )%     $ 2,490     $ 2,727       (9 )%
    Distribution per common unit declared for the period   $ 0.3800     $ 0.3175       20 %     $ 1.3325     $ 1.1200       19 %
                                                       
        Three Months Ended
    December 31,
      %     Twelve Months Ended
    December 31,
      %
    Non-GAAP Results (1)   2024   2023
      Change     2024
      2023
      Change
    Adjusted net income attributable to PAA   $ 357     $ 355       1 %     $ 1,318     $ 1,250       5 %
    Diluted adjusted net income per common unit   $ 0.42     $ 0.42       %     $ 1.51     $ 1.42       6 %
    Adjusted EBITDA   $ 867     $ 875       (1 )%     $ 3,326     $ 3,167       5 %
    Adjusted EBITDA attributable to PAA (2)   $ 729     $ 737       (1 )%     $ 2,779     $ 2,711       3 %
    Implied DCF per common unit and common unit equivalent   $ 0.64     $ 0.68       (6 )%     $ 2.49     $ 2.46       1 %
    Adjusted Free Cash Flow   $ 365     $ 710     **     $ 1,247     $ 1,798       (31 )%
    Adjusted Free Cash Flow after Distributions   $ 79     $ 458     **     $ 102     $ 809       (87 )%
    Adjusted Free Cash Flow (Excluding Changes in Assets & Liabilities) (3)   $ 134     $ 402       **     $ 1,173     $ 1,604       (27 )%
    Adjusted Free Cash Flow after Distributions (Excluding Changes in Assets & Liabilities) (3)   $ (152 )   $ 150     **     $ 28     $ 615       (95 )%
         
    ** Indicates that variance as a percentage is not meaningful.
    (1) See the section of this release entitled “Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Selected Items Impacting Comparability” and the tables attached hereto for information regarding our Non-GAAP financial measures, including their reconciliation to the most directly comparable measures as reported in accordance with GAAP, and certain selected items that PAA believes impact comparability of financial results between reporting periods.
    (2) Excludes amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests in the Plains Oryx Permian Basin LLC joint venture, Cactus II Pipeline LLC and Red River Pipeline LLC.
    (3) Fourth-quarter and full-year 2024 Adjusted Free Cash Flow (Excluding Changes in Assets & Liabilities) includes the negative impact of a $225 million charge resulting from the write-off of a receivable for Line 901 insurance proceeds.
         

    Summary of Selected Financial Data by Segment (unaudited)
    (in millions)

      Segment Adjusted EBITDA
      Crude Oil   NGL
    Three Months Ended December 31, 2024 $ 569     $ 154  
    Three Months Ended December 31, 2023 $ 563     $ 169  
    Percentage change in Segment Adjusted EBITDA versus 2023 period 1 %   (9 )%
               
      Segment Adjusted EBITDA
      Crude Oil   NGL
    Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2024 $ 2,276     $ 480  
    Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2023 $ 2,163     $ 522  
    Percentage change in Segment Adjusted EBITDA versus 2023 period 5 %   (8 )%
               

    Fourth-quarter 2024 Crude Oil Segment Adjusted EBITDA increased 1% versus comparable 2023 results primarily due to higher tariff volumes on our pipelines, tariff escalations and contributions from acquisitions. These items were partially offset by fewer market-based opportunities, as well as an increase in estimated costs for long-term environmental remediation obligations.

    Fourth-quarter 2024 NGL Segment Adjusted EBITDA decreased 9% versus comparable 2023 results primarily due to lower weighted average frac spreads in the fourth quarter of 2024.

    Plains GP Holdings

    PAGP owns an indirect non-economic controlling interest in PAA’s general partner and an indirect limited partner interest in PAA. As the control entity of PAA, PAGP consolidates PAA’s results into its financial statements, which is reflected in the condensed consolidating balance sheet and income statement tables attached hereto.

    Conference Call and Webcast Instructions

    PAA and PAGP will hold a joint conference call at 9:00 a.m. CT on Friday, February 7, 2025 to discuss fourth-quarter performance and related items.

    To access the internet webcast, please go to https://edge.media-server.com/mmc/p/xp2zqt6q/.

    Alternatively, the webcast can be accessed on our website at https://ir.plains.com/news-events/events-presentations. Following the live webcast, an audio replay will be available on our website and will be accessible for a period of 365 days. Slides will be posted prior to the call at the above referenced website.

    Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Selected Items Impacting Comparability

    To supplement our financial information presented in accordance with GAAP, management uses additional measures known as “non-GAAP financial measures” in its evaluation of past performance and prospects for the future and to assess the amount of cash that is available for distributions, debt repayments, common equity repurchases and other general partnership purposes. The primary additional measures used by management are Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA attributable to PAA, Implied Distributable Cash Flow (“DCF”), Adjusted Free Cash Flow and Adjusted Free Cash Flow after Distributions.

    Our definition and calculation of certain non-GAAP financial measures may not be comparable to similarly-titled measures of other companies. Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA attributable to PAA, Implied DCF and certain other non-GAAP financial performance measures are reconciled to Net Income, and Adjusted Free Cash Flow, Adjusted Free Cash Flow after Distributions and certain other non-GAAP financial liquidity measures are reconciled to Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities (the most directly comparable measures as reported in accordance with GAAP) for the historical periods presented in the tables attached to this release, and should be viewed in addition to, and not in lieu of, our Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying notes. In addition, we encourage you to visit our website at www.plains.com (in particular the section under “Financial Information” entitled “Non-GAAP Reconciliations” within the Investor Relations tab), which presents a reconciliation of our commonly used non-GAAP and supplemental financial measures. We do not reconcile non-GAAP financial measures on a forward-looking basis as it is impractical to do so without unreasonable effort.

    Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures

    Adjusted EBITDA is defined as earnings before (i) interest expense, (ii) income tax (expense)/benefit, (iii) depreciation and amortization (including our proportionate share of depreciation and amortization, including write-downs related to cancelled projects and impairments, of unconsolidated entities), (iv) gains and losses on asset sales, asset impairments and other, net, (v) gains and losses on investments in unconsolidated entities and (vi) interest income on promissory notes by and among PAA and certain Plains entities, and (vii) adjusted for certain selected items impacting comparability. Adjusted EBITDA attributable to PAA excludes the portion of Adjusted EBITDA that is attributable to noncontrolling interests.

    Management believes that the presentation of Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA attributable to PAA and Implied DCF provides useful information to investors regarding our performance and results of operations because these measures, when used to supplement related GAAP financial measures, (i) provide additional information about our core operating performance and ability to fund distributions to our unitholders through cash generated by our operations and (ii) provide investors with the same financial analytical framework upon which management bases financial, operational, compensation and planning/budgeting decisions. We also present these and additional non-GAAP financial measures, including adjusted net income attributable to PAA and basic and diluted adjusted net income per common unit, as they are measures that investors, rating agencies and debt holders have indicated are useful in assessing us and our results of operations. These non-GAAP financial performance measures may exclude, for example, (i) charges for obligations that are expected to be settled with the issuance of equity instruments, (ii) gains and losses on derivative instruments that are related to underlying activities in another period (or the reversal of such adjustments from a prior period), gains and losses on derivatives that are either related to investing activities (such as the purchase of linefill) or purchases of long-term inventory, and inventory valuation adjustments, as applicable, (iii) long-term inventory costing adjustments, (iv) items that are not indicative of our core operating results and/or (v) other items that we believe should be excluded in understanding our core operating performance. These measures may be further adjusted to include amounts related to deficiencies associated with minimum volume commitments whereby we have billed the counterparties for their deficiency obligation and such amounts are recognized as deferred revenue in “Other current liabilities” in our Consolidated Financial Statements. We also adjust for amounts billed by our equity method investees related to deficiencies under minimum volume commitments. Such amounts are presented net of applicable amounts subsequently recognized into revenue. Furthermore, the calculation of these measures contemplates tax effects as a separate reconciling item, where applicable. We have defined all such items as “selected items impacting comparability.” Due to the nature of the selected items, certain selected items impacting comparability may impact certain non-GAAP financial measures, referred to as adjusted results, but not impact other non-GAAP financial measures. We do not necessarily consider all of our selected items impacting comparability to be non-recurring, infrequent or unusual, but we believe that an understanding of these selected items impacting comparability is material to the evaluation of our operating results and prospects.

    Although we present selected items impacting comparability that management considers in evaluating our performance, you should also be aware that the items presented do not represent all items that affect comparability between the periods presented. Variations in our operating results are also caused by changes in volumes, prices, exchange rates, mechanical interruptions, acquisitions, divestitures, investment capital projects and numerous other factors. These types of variations may not be separately identified in this release, but will be discussed, as applicable, in management’s discussion and analysis of operating results in our Annual Report on Form 10-K.

    Non-GAAP Financial Liquidity Measures

    Management uses the non-GAAP financial liquidity measures Adjusted Free Cash Flow and Adjusted Free Cash Flow after Distributions to assess the amount of cash that is available for distributions, debt repayments, common equity repurchases and other general partnership purposes. Adjusted Free Cash Flow is defined as Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities, less Net Cash Provided by/(Used in) Investing Activities, which primarily includes acquisition, investment and maintenance capital expenditures, investments in unconsolidated entities and the impact from the purchase and sale of linefill, net of proceeds from the sales of assets and further impacted by distributions to and contributions from noncontrolling interests and proceeds from the issuance of related party notes. Adjusted Free Cash Flow is further reduced by cash distributions paid to our preferred and common unitholders to arrive at Adjusted Free Cash Flow after Distributions.

    We also present these measures and additional non-GAAP financial liquidity measures as they are measures that investors have indicated are useful. We present the Adjusted Free Cash Flow (Excluding Changes in Assets & Liabilities) for use in assessing our underlying business liquidity and cash flow generating capacity excluding fluctuations caused by timing of when amounts earned or incurred were collected, received or paid from period to period. Adjusted Free Cash Flow (Excluding Changes in Assets & Liabilities) is defined as Adjusted Free Cash Flow excluding the impact of “Changes in assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions” on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. Adjusted Free Cash Flow (Excluding Changes in Assets & Liabilities) is further reduced by cash distributions paid to our preferred and common unitholders to arrive at Adjusted Free Cash Flow after Distributions (Excluding Changes in Assets & Liabilities).

           
    PLAINS ALL AMERICAN PIPELINE, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    FINANCIAL SUMMARY (unaudited)
    CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
    (in millions, except per unit data)
           
      Three Months Ended
    December 31,
      Twelve Months Ended
    December 31,
      2024   2023   2024   2023
    REVENUES $ 12,402     $ 12,698     $ 50,073     $ 48,712  
                   
    COSTS AND EXPENSES              
    Purchases and related costs   11,227       11,558       45,560       44,531  
    Field operating costs (1)   578       363       1,768       1,425  
    General and administrative expenses   93       87       381       350  
    Depreciation and amortization   258       273       1,026       1,048  
    (Gains)/losses on asset sales, asset impairments and other, net   159       (9 )     160       (152 )
    Total costs and expenses   12,315       12,272       48,895       47,202  
                   
    OPERATING INCOME   87       426       1,178       1,510  
                   
    OTHER INCOME/(EXPENSE)              
    Equity earnings in unconsolidated entities   154       92       452       369  
    Gain on investments in unconsolidated entities, net   15             15       28  
    Interest expense, net (2)   (112 )     (97 )     (430 )     (386 )
    Other income, net (2)   20       17       65       102  
                   
    INCOME BEFORE TAX   164       438       1,280       1,623  
    Current income tax expense (3)   (52 )     (41 )     (195 )     (145 )
    Deferred income tax benefit   7       2       28       24  
                   
    NET INCOME   119       399       1,113       1,502  
    Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests   (83 )     (87 )     (341 )     (272 )
    NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO PAA $ 36     $ 312     $ 772     $ 1,230  
                   
    NET INCOME/(LOSS) PER COMMON UNIT:              
    Net income/(loss) allocated to common unitholders — Basic and Diluted $ (27 )   $ 248     $ 514     $ 976  
    Basic and diluted weighted average common units outstanding   704       701       702       699  
    Basic and diluted net income/(loss) per common unit $ (0.04 )   $ 0.35     $ 0.73     $ 1.40  
         
    (1) Field operating costs include $225 million and $345 million for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2024, respectively, resulting from adjustments related to the Line 901 incident that occurred in May 2015, including the write-off of a receivable for Line 901 insurance proceeds in the fourth quarter of 2024 and settlements in the third quarter of 2024.
    (2) PAA and certain Plains entities have issued promissory notes by and among such entities to facilitate financing. “Interest expense, net” and “Other income, net” each include $17 million and $48 million for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2024, respectively, related to interest on such notes. These amounts offset and do not impact Net Income or Non-GAAP metrics such as Adjusted EBITDA, Implied DCF and Adjusted Free Cash Flow.
    (3) The increase in current income tax expense for the 2024 periods was largely associated with Canadian withholding tax on dividends from our Canadian entities to other Plains entities driven by timing of dividend payments.
         
    PLAINS ALL AMERICAN PIPELINE, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    FINANCIAL SUMMARY (unaudited)
    CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET DATA
    (in millions)
           
      December 31,
    2024
      December 31,
    2023
    ASSETS      
    Current assets (including Cash and cash equivalents of $348 and $450, respectively) $ 4,802     $ 4,913  
    Property and equipment, net   15,424       15,782  
    Investments in unconsolidated entities   2,811       2,820  
    Intangible assets, net   1,677       1,875  
    Linefill   968       976  
    Long-term operating lease right-of-use assets, net   332       313  
    Long-term inventory   280       265  
    Other long-term assets, net   268       411  
    Total assets $ 26,562     $ 27,355  
           
    LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL      
    Current liabilities $ 4,950     $ 5,003  
    Senior notes, net   7,141       7,242  
    Other long-term debt, net   72       63  
    Long-term operating lease liabilities   313       274  
    Other long-term liabilities and deferred credits   990       1,041  
    Total liabilities   13,466       13,623  
           
    Partners’ capital excluding noncontrolling interests   9,813       10,422  
    Noncontrolling interests   3,283       3,310  
    Total partners’ capital   13,096       13,732  
    Total liabilities and partners’ capital $ 26,562     $ 27,355  
                   

    DEBT CAPITALIZATION RATIOS
    (in millions)

      December 31,
    2024
      December 31,
    2023
    Short-term debt $ 408     $ 446  
    Long-term debt   7,213       7,305  
    Total debt $ 7,621     $ 7,751  
           
    Long-term debt $ 7,213     $ 7,305  
    Partners’ capital excluding noncontrolling interests   9,813       10,422  
    Total book capitalization excluding noncontrolling interests (“Total book capitalization”) $ 17,026     $ 17,727  
    Total book capitalization, including short-term debt $ 17,434     $ 18,173  
           
    Long-term debt-to-total book capitalization   42 %     41 %
    Total debt-to-total book capitalization, including short-term debt   44 %     43 %
                   
    PLAINS ALL AMERICAN PIPELINE, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    FINANCIAL SUMMARY (unaudited)
    COMPUTATION OF BASIC AND DILUTED NET INCOME/(LOSS) PER COMMON UNIT (1)
    (in millions, except per unit data)
           
      Three Months Ended
    December 31,
      Twelve Months Ended
    December 31,
      2024   2023   2024   2023
    Basic and Diluted Net Income/(Loss) per Common Unit              
    Net income attributable to PAA $ 36     $ 312     $ 772     $ 1,230  
    Distributions to Series A preferred unitholders   (44 )     (44 )     (175 )     (173 )
    Distributions to Series B preferred unitholders   (19 )     (20 )     (78 )     (76 )
    Amounts allocated to participating securities   (1 )     (1 )     (10 )     (10 )
    Other   1       1       5       5  
    Net income/(loss) allocated to common unitholders $ (27 )   $ 248     $ 514     $ 976  
                   
    Basic and diluted weighted average common units outstanding (2) (3)   704       701       702       699  
                   
    Basic and diluted net income/(loss) per common unit $ (0.04 )   $ 0.35     $ 0.73     $ 1.40  
         
    (1) We calculate net income/(loss) allocated to common unitholders based on the distributions pertaining to the current period’s net income. After adjusting for the appropriate period’s distributions, the remaining undistributed earnings or excess distributions over earnings, if any, are allocated to common unitholders and participating securities in accordance with the contractual terms of our partnership agreement in effect for the period and as further prescribed under the two-class method.
    (2) The possible conversion of our Series A preferred units was excluded from the calculation of diluted net income/(loss) per common unit for each of the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 as the effect was antidilutive.
    (3) Our equity-indexed compensation plan awards that contemplate the issuance of common units are considered potentially dilutive unless (i) they become vested only upon the satisfaction of a performance condition and (ii) that performance condition has yet to be satisfied. Equity-indexed compensation plan awards that are deemed to be dilutive are reduced by a hypothetical common unit repurchase based on the remaining unamortized fair value, as prescribed by the treasury stock method in guidance issued by the FASB.
         
    PLAINS ALL AMERICAN PIPELINE, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    FINANCIAL SUMMARY (unaudited)
    CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOW DATA
    (in millions)
       
      Twelve Months Ended
    December 31, 2024
      2024   2023
    CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES      
    Net income $ 1,113     $ 1,502  
    Reconciliation of net income to net cash provided by operating activities:      
    Depreciation and amortization   1,026       1,048  
    (Gains)/losses on asset sales, asset impairments and other, net   160       (152 )
    Deferred income tax benefit   (28 )     (24 )
    Change in fair value of Preferred Distribution Rate Reset Option         (58 )
    Equity earnings in unconsolidated entities   (452 )     (369 )
    Distributions on earnings from unconsolidated entities   505       458  
    Gain on investments in unconsolidated entities, net   (15 )     (28 )
    Other   107       156  
    Changes in assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions   74       194  
    Net cash provided by operating activities   2,490       2,727  
           
    CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES      
    Net cash used in investing activities (1)   (1,504 )     (702 )
           
    CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES      
    Net cash used in financing activities (1)   (1,077 )     (1,976 )
           
    Effect of translation adjustment   (11 )      
           
    Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash   (102 )     49  
           
    Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of period   450       401  
    Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of period $ 348     $ 450  
         
    (1)  PAA and certain Plains entities have issued promissory notes by and among such entities to facilitate financing. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2024, “Net cash used in investing activities” includes a cash outflow of $629 million associated with our investment in related party notes. An equal and offsetting cash inflow associated with our issuance of related party notes is included in “Net cash used in financing activities.”
         

    CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
    (in millions)

      Net to PAA (1)   Consolidated
      Three Months Ended
    December 31,
      Twelve Months Ended
    December 31,
      Three Months Ended
    December 31,
      Twelve Months Ended
    December 31,
      2024
      2023
      2024
      2023
      2024
      2023
      2024
      2023
    Investment capital expenditures:                              
    Crude Oil $ 55     $ 75     $ 214     $ 245     $ 80     $ 100     $ 300     $ 334  
    NGL   41       14       115       65       41       14       115       65  
    Total Investment capital expenditures   96       89       329       310       121       114       415       399  
    Maintenance capital expenditures   68       58       242       214       73       63       261       231  
      $ 164     $ 147     $ 571     $ 524     $ 194     $ 177     $ 676     $ 630  
         
    (1)  Excludes expenditures attributable to noncontrolling interests.
         
    PLAINS ALL AMERICAN PIPELINE, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    FINANCIAL SUMMARY (unaudited)
    NON-GAAP RECONCILIATIONS
    (in millions, except per unit and ratio data)
           
    Computation of Basic and Diluted Adjusted Net Income Per Common Unit (1):
           
      Three Months Ended
    December 31,
      Twelve Months Ended
    December 31,
      2024   2023   2024   2023
    Basic and Diluted Adjusted Net Income per Common Unit              
    Net income attributable to PAA $ 36     $ 312     $ 772     $ 1,230  
    Selected items impacting comparability – Adjusted net income attributable to PAA (2)   321       43       546       20  
    Adjusted net income attributable to PAA $ 357     $ 355     $ 1,318     $ 1,250  
    Distributions to Series A preferred unitholders   (44 )     (44 )     (175 )     (173 )
    Distributions to Series B preferred unitholders   (19 )     (20 )     (78 )     (76 )
    Amounts allocated to participating securities   (1 )     (1 )     (11 )     (10 )
    Other   1       1       5       5  
    Adjusted net income allocated to common unitholders $ 294     $ 291     $ 1,059     $ 996  
                   
    Basic and diluted weighted average common units outstanding (3) (4)   704       701       702       699  
                   
    Basic and diluted adjusted net income per common unit $ 0.42     $ 0.42     $ 1.51     $ 1.42  
         
    (1) We calculate adjusted net income allocated to common unitholders based on the distributions pertaining to the current period’s net income. After adjusting for the appropriate period’s distributions, the remaining undistributed earnings or excess distributions over earnings, if any, are allocated to the common unitholders and participating securities in accordance with the contractual terms of our partnership agreement in effect for the period and as further prescribed under the two-class method.
    (2) See the “Selected Items Impacting Comparability” table for additional information.
    (3) The possible conversion of our Series A preferred units was excluded from the calculation of diluted adjusted net income per common unit for each of the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 as the effect was antidilutive.
    (4) Our equity-indexed compensation plan awards that contemplate the issuance of common units are considered potentially dilutive unless (i) they become vested only upon the satisfaction of a performance condition and (ii) that performance condition has yet to be satisfied. Equity-indexed compensation plan awards that are deemed to be dilutive are reduced by a hypothetical common unit repurchase based on the remaining unamortized fair value, as prescribed by the treasury stock method in guidance issued by the FASB.
         

    Net Income/(Loss) Per Common Unit to Adjusted Net Income Per Common Unit Reconciliation:

      Three Months Ended
    December 31,
      Twelve Months Ended
    December 31,
      2024   2023
      2024
      2023
    Basic and diluted net income/(loss) per common unit $ (0.04 )   $ 0.35     $ 0.73     $ 1.40  
    Selected items impacting comparability per common unit (1)   0.46       0.07       0.78       0.02  
    Basic and diluted adjusted net income per common unit $ 0.42     $ 0.42     $ 1.51     $ 1.42  
         
    (1)  See the “Selected Items Impacting Comparability” and the “Computation of Basic and Diluted Adjusted Net Income/(Loss) Per Common Unit” tables for additional information.
         
    PLAINS ALL AMERICAN PIPELINE, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    FINANCIAL SUMMARY (unaudited)
    Net Income to Adjusted EBITDA attributable to PAA and Implied DCF Reconciliation:
           
      Three Months Ended
    December 31,
      Twelve Months Ended
    December 31,
      2024   2023   2024   2023
    Net Income $ 119     $ 399     $ 1,113     $ 1,502  
    Interest expense, net of certain items (1)   95       97       382       386  
    Income tax expense   45       39       167       121  
    Depreciation and amortization   258       273       1,026       1,048  
    (Gains)/losses on asset sales, asset impairments and other, net   159       (9 )     160       (152 )
    Gain on investments in unconsolidated entities, net   (15 )           (15 )     (28 )
    Depreciation and amortization of unconsolidated entities (2)   26       20       84       87  
    Selected items impacting comparability – Adjusted EBITDA (3)   180       56       409       203  
    Adjusted EBITDA $ 867     $ 875     $ 3,326     $ 3,167  
    Adjusted EBITDA attributable to noncontrolling interests   (138 )     (138 )     (547 )     (456 )
    Adjusted EBITDA attributable to PAA $ 729     $ 737     $ 2,779     $ 2,711  
                   
    Adjusted EBITDA $ 867     $ 875     $ 3,326     $ 3,167  
    Interest expense, net of certain non-cash items (4)   (92 )     (92 )     (365 )     (367 )
    Maintenance capital   (73 )     (63 )     (261 )     (231 )
    Investment capital of noncontrolling interests (5)   (24 )     (24 )     (86 )     (87 )
    Current income tax expense   (52 )     (41 )     (195 )     (145 )
    Distributions from unconsolidated entities in excess of/(less than) adjusted equity earnings (6)         (15 )     11       (37 )
    Distributions to noncontrolling interests (7)   (114 )     (97 )     (425 )     (333 )
    Implied DCF $ 512     $ 543     $ 2,005     $ 1,967  
    Preferred unit cash distributions paid (7)   (63 )     (64 )     (254 )     (241 )
    Implied DCF Available to Common Unitholders $ 449     $ 479     $ 1,751     $ 1,726  
                   
    Weighted Average Common Units Outstanding   704       701       702       699  
    Weighted Average Common Units and Common Unit Equivalents   775       772       773       770  
                   
    Implied DCF per Common Unit (8) $ 0.64     $ 0.68     $ 2.49     $ 2.47  
    Implied DCF per Common Unit and Common Unit Equivalent (9) $ 0.64     $ 0.68     $ 2.49     $ 2.46  
                   
    Cash Distribution Paid per Common Unit $ 0.3175     $ 0.2675     $ 1.2700     $ 1.0700  
    Common Unit Cash Distributions (7) $ 223     $ 188     $ 891     $ 748  
    Common Unit Distribution Coverage Ratio 2.01x   2.55x   1.97x   2.31x
                   
    Implied DCF Excess $ 226     $ 291     $ 860     $ 978  
         
    (1)  Represents “Interest expense, net” as reported on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, net of interest income associated with promissory notes by and among PAA and certain Plains entities.
    (2) Adjustment to exclude our proportionate share of depreciation and amortization expense (including write-downs related to cancelled projects and impairments) of unconsolidated entities.
    (3) See the “Selected Items Impacting Comparability” table for additional information.
    (4) Amount excludes certain non-cash items impacting interest expense such as amortization of debt issuance costs and terminated interest rate swaps.
    (5) Investment capital expenditures attributable to noncontrolling interests that reduce Implied DCF available to PAA common unitholders.
    (6)  Comprised of cash distributions received from unconsolidated entities less equity earnings in unconsolidated entities (adjusted for our proportionate share of depreciation and amortization, including write-downs related to cancelled projects and impairments, and selected items impacting comparability of unconsolidated entities).
    (7) Cash distributions paid during the period presented.
    (8) Implied DCF Available to Common Unitholders for the period divided by the weighted average common units outstanding for the period.
    (9) Implied DCF Available to Common Unitholders for the period, adjusted for Series A preferred unit cash distributions paid, divided by the weighted average common units and common unit equivalents outstanding for the period. Our Series A preferred units are convertible into common units, generally on a one-for-one basis and subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments, in whole or in part, subject to certain minimum conversion amounts.
         
    PLAINS ALL AMERICAN PIPELINE, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    FINANCIAL SUMMARY (unaudited)
    Net Income Per Common Unit to Implied DCF Per Common Unit and Common Unit Equivalent Reconciliation:
           
      Three Months Ended
    December 31,
      Twelve Months Ended
    December 31,
      2024   2023
      2024
      2023
    Basic net income/(loss) per common unit $ (0.04 )   $ 0.35     $ 0.73     $ 1.40  
    Reconciling items per common unit (1) (2)   0.68       0.33       1.76       1.07  
    Implied DCF per common unit $ 0.64     $ 0.68     $ 2.49     $ 2.47  
                   
    Basic net income/(loss) per common unit $ (0.04 )   $ 0.35     $ 0.73     $ 1.40  
    Reconciling items per common unit and common unit equivalent (1) (3)   0.68       0.33       1.76       1.06  
    Implied DCF per common unit and common unit equivalent $ 0.64     $ 0.68     $ 2.49     $ 2.46  
         
    (1) Represents adjustments to Net Income to calculate Implied DCF Available to Common Unitholders. See the “Net Income to Adjusted EBITDA attributable to PAA and Implied DCF Reconciliation” table for additional information.
    (2) Based on weighted average common units outstanding for the period of 704 million, 701 million, 702 million and 699 million, respectively.
    (3) Based on weighted average common units outstanding for the period, as well as weighted average Series A preferred units outstanding of 71 million for each of the periods presented.
         
    PLAINS ALL AMERICAN PIPELINE, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    FINANCIAL SUMMARY (unaudited)
    Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities to Non-GAAP Financial Liquidity Measures Reconciliation:
           
      Three Months Ended
    December 31,
      Twelve Months Ended
    December 31,
      2024   2023   2024   2023
    Net cash provided by operating activities $ 726     $ 1,011     $ 2,490     $ 2,727  
    Adjustments to reconcile Net cash provided by operating activities to Adjusted Free Cash Flow:              
    Net cash used in investing activities (1)   (264 )     (257 )     (1,504 )     (702 )
    Cash contributions from noncontrolling interests   17       53       57       106  
    Cash distributions paid to noncontrolling interests (2)   (114 )     (97 )     (425 )     (333 )
    Proceeds from the issuance of related party notes (1)               629        
    Adjusted Free Cash Flow (3) $ 365     $ 710     $ 1,247     $ 1,798  
    Cash distributions (4)   (286 )     (252 )     (1,145 )     (989 )
    Adjusted Free Cash Flow after Distributions (3)(5) $ 79     $ 458     $ 102     $ 809  
                   
      Three Months Ended
    December 31,
      Twelve Months Ended
    December 31,
      2024   2023   2024   2023
    Adjusted Free Cash Flow (3) $ 365     $ 710     $ 1,247     $ 1,798  
    Changes in assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions (6)   (231 )     (308 )     (74 )     (194 )
    Adjusted Free Cash Flow (Excluding Changes in Assets & Liabilities) (7)(8) $ 134     $ 402     $ 1,173     $ 1,604  
    Cash distributions (4)   (286 )     (252 )     (1,145 )     (989 )
    Adjusted Free Cash Flow after Distributions (Excluding Changes in Assets & Liabilities) (7)(8) $ (152 )   $ 150     $ 28     $ 615  
         
    (1)  PAA and certain Plains entities have issued promissory notes by and among such entities to facilitate financing. “Proceeds from the issuance of related party notes” has an equal and offsetting cash outflow associated with our investment in related party notes, which is included as a component of “Net cash used in investing activities.”
    (2)  Cash distributions paid during the period presented.
    (3)  Management uses the non-GAAP financial liquidity measures Adjusted Free Cash Flow and Adjusted Free Cash Flow after Distributions to assess the amount of cash that is available for distributions, debt repayments, common equity repurchases and other general partnership purposes. Adjusted Free Cash Flow after Distributions shortages, if any, may be funded from previously established reserves, cash on hand or from borrowings under our credit facilities or commercial paper program.
    (4)  Cash distributions paid to preferred and common unitholders during the period.
    (5)  Excess Adjusted Free Cash Flow after Distributions is retained to establish reserves for future distributions, capital expenditures, debt reduction and other partnership purposes. Adjusted Free Cash Flow after Distributions shortages may be funded from previously established reserves, cash on hand or from borrowings under our credit facilities or commercial paper program.
    (6)  See the “Condensed Consolidated Cash Flow Data” table.
    (7)   Management uses the non-GAAP financial liquidity measures Adjusted Free Cash Flow (Excluding Changes in Assets & Liabilities) and Adjusted Free Cash Flow after Distributions (Excluding Changes in Assets & Liabilities) to assess the underlying business liquidity and cash flow generating capacity excluding fluctuations caused by timing of when amounts earned or incurred were collected, received or paid from period to period.
    (8)  Fourth-quarter and full-year 2024 Adjusted Free Cash Flow (Excluding Changes in Assets & Liabilities) includes the negative impact of a $225 million charge resulting from the write-off of a receivable for Line 901 insurance proceeds.
         
    PLAINS ALL AMERICAN PIPELINE, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    FINANCIAL SUMMARY (unaudited)
    SELECTED ITEMS IMPACTING COMPARABILITY
    (in millions)
           
      Three Months Ended
    December 31,
      Twelve Months Ended
    December 31,
      2024   2023   2024   2023
    Selected Items Impacting Comparability: (1)              
    Derivative activities and inventory valuation adjustments (2) $ (6 )   $ 43     $ (85 )   $ (101 )
    Long-term inventory costing adjustments (3)   17       (62 )     9       (35 )
    Deficiencies under minimum volume commitments, net (4)   41       (8 )     31       (12 )
    Equity-indexed compensation expense (5)   (8 )     (8 )     (36 )     (36 )
    Foreign currency revaluation (6)   1       (11 )     17       (8 )
    Line 901 incident (7)   (225 )     (10 )     (345 )     (10 )
    Transaction-related expenses (8)                     (1 )
    Selected items impacting comparability – Adjusted EBITDA $ (180 )   $ (56 )   $ (409 )   $ (203 )
    Gain on investments in unconsolidated entities, net   15             15       28  
    Gains/(losses) on asset sales, asset impairments and other, net (9)   (159 )     9       (160 )     152  
    Tax effect on selected items impacting comparability   3       4       13       13  
    Aggregate selected items impacting noncontrolling interests               (5 )     (10 )
    Selected items impacting comparability – Adjusted net income attributable to PAA $ (321 )   $ (43 )   $ (546 )   $ (20 )
         
    (1)  Certain of our non-GAAP financial measures may not be impacted by each of the selected items impacting comparability. See the “Net Income to Adjusted EBITDA attributable to PAA and Implied DCF Reconciliation” and “Computation of Basic and Diluted Adjusted Net Income Per Common Unit” table for additional details on how these selected items impacting comparability affect such measures.
    (2) We use derivative instruments for risk management purposes and our related processes include specific identification of hedging instruments to an underlying hedged transaction. Although we identify an underlying transaction for each derivative instrument we enter into, there may not be an accounting hedge relationship between the instrument and the underlying transaction. In the course of evaluating our results, we identify differences in the timing of earnings from the derivative instruments and the underlying transactions and exclude the related gains and losses in determining adjusted results such that the earnings from the derivative instruments and the underlying transactions impact adjusted results in the same period. In addition, we exclude gains and losses on derivatives that are related to (i) investing activities, such as the purchase of linefill, and (ii) purchases of long-term inventory. We also exclude the impact of corresponding inventory valuation adjustments, as applicable. For applicable periods, we excluded gains and losses from the mark-to-market of the embedded derivative associated with the Preferred Distribution Rate Reset Option of our Series A preferred units.
    (3) We carry crude oil and NGL inventory that is comprised of minimum working inventory requirements in third-party assets and other working inventory that is needed for our commercial operations. We consider this inventory necessary to conduct our operations and we intend to carry this inventory for the foreseeable future. Therefore, we classify this inventory as long-term on our balance sheet and do not hedge the inventory with derivative instruments (similar to linefill in our own assets). We treat the impact of changes in the average cost of the long-term inventory (that result from fluctuations in market prices) and write-downs of such inventory that result from price declines as a selected item impacting comparability.
    (4) We, and certain of our equity method investees, have certain agreements that require counterparties to deliver, transport or throughput a minimum volume over an agreed upon period. Substantially all of such agreements were entered into with counterparties to economically support the return on capital expenditure necessary to construct the related asset. Some of these agreements include make-up rights if the minimum volume is not met. We record a receivable from the counterparty in the period that services are provided or when the transaction occurs, including amounts for deficiency obligations from counterparties associated with minimum volume commitments. If a counterparty has a make-up right associated with a deficiency, we defer the revenue attributable to the counterparty’s make-up right and subsequently recognize the revenue at the earlier of when the deficiency volume is delivered or shipped, when the make-up right expires or when it is determined that the counterparty’s ability to utilize the make-up right is remote. We include the impact of amounts billed to counterparties for their deficiency obligation, net of applicable amounts subsequently recognized into revenue or equity earnings, as a selected item impacting comparability. We believe the inclusion of the contractually committed revenues associated with that period is meaningful to investors as the related asset has been constructed, is standing ready to provide the committed service and the fixed operating costs are included in the current period results.
    (5) Our total equity-indexed compensation expense includes expense associated with awards that will be settled in units and awards that will be settled in cash. The awards that will be settled in units are included in our diluted net income per unit calculation when the applicable performance criteria have been met. We consider the compensation expense associated with these awards as a selected item impacting comparability as the dilutive impact of the outstanding awards is included in our diluted net income per unit calculation, as applicable. The portion of compensation expense associated with awards that will be settled in cash is not considered a selected item impacting comparability.
    (6) During the periods presented, there were fluctuations in the value of the Canadian dollar to the U.S. dollar, resulting in the realization of foreign exchange gains and losses on the settlement of foreign currency transactions as well as the revaluation of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in a foreign currency. The associated gains and losses are not integral to our results and were thus classified as a selected item impacting comparability.
    (7) Includes costs recognized during the period related to the Line 901 incident that occurred in May 2015. For the 2024 periods, includes the write-off of a receivable for Line 901 insurance proceeds in the fourth quarter of 2024 and the impact of settlements in the third quarter of 2024.
    (8) Includes expenses associated with the Rattler Permian Transaction.
    (9) For the 2024 periods, primarily includes non-cash charges related to the write-down of two U.S. NGL terminals. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2023 primarily includes gains related to the sale of our Keyera Fort Saskatchewan facility.
         
    PLAINS ALL AMERICAN PIPELINE, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    FINANCIAL SUMMARY (unaudited)
    SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA BY SEGMENT
    (in millions)
             
      Three Months Ended
    December 31, 2024
        Three Months Ended
    December 31, 2023
      Crude Oil   NGL     Crude Oil   NGL
    Revenues (1) $ 11,959     $ 535       $ 12,187     $ 623  
    Purchases and related costs (1)   (11,019 )     (300 )       (11,306 )     (364 )
    Field operating costs (2)(3)   (503 )     (75 )       (274 )     (89 )
    Segment general and administrative expenses (2) (4)   (74 )     (19 )       (68 )     (19 )
    Equity earnings in unconsolidated entities   154               92        
                     
    Other segment items: (5)                
    Depreciation and amortization of unconsolidated entities   26               20        
    Derivative activities and inventory valuation adjustments   (16 )     22         (52 )     9  
    Long-term inventory costing adjustments   (9 )     (8 )       58       4  
    Deficiencies under minimum volume commitments, net   (41 )             8        
    Equity-indexed compensation expense   8               8        
    Foreign currency revaluation   (4 )     (1 )       18       5  
    Line 901 incident   225               10        
    Segment amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests (6)   (137 )             (138 )      
    Segment Adjusted EBITDA $ 569     $ 154       $ 563     $ 169  
                     
    Maintenance capital expenditures $ 48     $ 25       $ 39     $ 24  
         
    (1) Includes intersegment amounts.
    (2) Field operating costs and Segment general and administrative expenses include equity-indexed compensation expense.
    (3) Field operating costs for the three months ended December 31, 2024 include higher expenses related to (i) $225 million resulting from the write-off of a receivable for Line 901 insurance proceeds and (ii) an increase in estimated costs for long-term environmental remediation obligations.
    (4) Segment general and administrative expenses reflect direct costs attributable to each segment and an allocation of other expenses to the segments. The proportional allocations by segment require judgment by management and are based on the business activities that exist during each period.
    (5) Represents adjustments utilized by our CODM in the evaluation of segment results. Many of these adjustments are also considered selected items impacting comparability when calculating consolidated non-GAAP financial measures such as Adjusted EBITDA. See the “Selected Items Impacting Comparability” table for additional discussion.
    (6) Reflects amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests in the Permian JV, Cactus II Pipeline LLC and Red River Pipeline LLC.
         
    PLAINS ALL AMERICAN PIPELINE, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    FINANCIAL SUMMARY (unaudited)
    SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA BY SEGMENT
    (in millions)
             
      Twelve Months Ended
    December 31, 2024
        Twelve Months Ended
    December 31, 2023
      Crude Oil   NGL     Crude Oil   NGL
    Revenues (1) $ 48,720     $ 1,724       $ 47,174     $ 1,935  
    Purchases and related costs (1)   (45,033 )     (898 )       (43,805 )     (1,123 )
    Field operating costs (2)(3)   (1,440 )     (328 )       (1,053 )     (372 )
    Segment general and administrative expenses (2) (4)   (298 )     (83 )       (271 )     (79 )
    Equity earnings in unconsolidated entities   452               369        
                     
    Other segment items: (5)                
    Depreciation and amortization of unconsolidated entities   84               87        
    Derivative activities and inventory valuation adjustments   5       80         17       142  
    Long-term inventory costing adjustments   1       (10 )       22       13  
    Deficiencies under minimum volume commitments, net   (31 )             12        
    Equity-indexed compensation expense   36               35       1  
    Foreign currency revaluation   (22 )     (5 )       19       5  
    Line 901 incident   345               10        
    Transaction-related expenses                 1        
    Segment amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests (6)   (543 )             (454 )      
    Segment Adjusted EBITDA $ 2,276     $ 480       $ 2,163     $ 522  
                     
    Maintenance capital expenditures $ 183     $ 78       $ 145     $ 86  
         
    (1) Includes intersegment amounts.
    (2) Field operating costs and Segment general and administrative expenses include equity-indexed compensation expense.
    (3) Field operating costs for the twelve months ended December 31, 2024 include higher expenses related to (i) $225 million resulting from the write-off of a receivable for Line 901 insurance proceeds, (ii) $120 million associated with settlements related to the Line 901 incident that occurred in May 2015 and (iii) an increase in estimated costs for long-term environmental remediation obligations.
    (4) Segment general and administrative expenses reflect direct costs attributable to each segment and an allocation of other expenses to the segments. The proportional allocations by segment require judgment by management and are based on the business activities that exist during each period.
    (5) Represents adjustments utilized by our CODM in the evaluation of segment results. Many of these adjustments are also considered selected items impacting comparability when calculating consolidated non-GAAP financial measures such as Adjusted EBITDA. See the “Selected Items Impacting Comparability” table for additional discussion.
    (6) Reflects amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests in the Permian JV, Cactus II Pipeline LLC and Red River Pipeline LLC.
         
    PLAINS ALL AMERICAN PIPELINE, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    FINANCIAL SUMMARY (unaudited)
    OPERATING DATA BY SEGMENT
           
      Three Months Ended
    December 31,
      Twelve Months Ended
    December 31,
      2024
      2023
      2024
      2023
    Crude Oil Segment Volumes                              
    Crude oil pipeline tariff (by region) (1)                              
    Permian Basin (2)   6,846       6,710       6,731       6,356  
    South Texas / Eagle Ford (2)   421       411       403       410  
    Mid-Continent (2)   478       503       506       507  
    Gulf Coast (2)   214       250       218       260  
    Rocky Mountain (2)   461       452       474       372  
    Western   259       237       256       214  
    Canada   349       340       346       341  
    Total crude oil pipeline tariff (1) (2)   9,028       8,903       8,934       8,460  
                                   
    Commercial crude oil storage capacity (2) (3)   72       72       72       72  
                                   
    Crude oil lease gathering purchases (1)   1,661       1,518       1,586       1,452  
                                   
    NGL Segment Volumes (1)                              
    NGL fractionation   138       127       132       115  
    NGL pipeline tariff   224       188       213       180  
    Propane and butane sales   127       125       92       86  
         
    (1) Average volumes in thousands of barrels per day calculated as the total volumes (attributable to our interest for assets owned by unconsolidated entities or through undivided joint interests) for the period divided by the number of days in the period. Volumes associated with assets acquired during the period represent total volumes for the number of days we actually owned the assets divided by the number of days in the period.
    (2) Includes volumes (attributable to our interest) from assets owned by unconsolidated entities.
    (3) Average monthly capacity in millions of barrels calculated as total volumes for the period divided by the number of months in the period.
         
    PLAINS ALL AMERICAN PIPELINE, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    FINANCIAL SUMMARY (unaudited)
    NON-GAAP SEGMENT RECONCILIATIONS
    (in millions)
           
    Supplemental Adjusted EBITDA attributable to PAA Reconciliation:      
           
      Three Months Ended
    December 31,
      Twelve Months Ended
    December 31,
      2024
      2023
      2024
      2023
    Crude Oil Segment Adjusted EBITDA $ 569     $ 563     $ 2,276     $ 2,163  
    NGL Segment Adjusted EBITDA   154       169       480       522  
    Adjusted other income, net (1)   6       5       23       26  
    Adjusted EBITDA attributable to PAA (2) $ 729     $ 737     $ 2,779     $ 2,711  
         
    (1)  Represents “Other income, net” as reported on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, excluding interest income on promissory notes by and among PAA and certain Plains entities, as well as other income, net attributable to noncontrolling interests, adjusted for selected items impacting comparability. See the “Selected Items Impacting Comparability” table for additional information.
    (2) See the “Net Income to Adjusted EBITDA attributable to PAA and Implied DCF Reconciliation” table for reconciliation to Net Income.
         
    PLAINS GP HOLDINGS AND SUBSIDIARIES
    FINANCIAL SUMMARY (unaudited)
    CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
    (in millions, except per share data)
             
      Three Months Ended
    December 31, 2024
        Three Months Ended
    December 31, 2023
          Consolidating             Consolidating    
      PAA   Adjustments (1)   PAGP     PAA   Adjustments (1)   PAGP
    REVENUES $ 12,402     $     $ 12,402       $ 12,698     $     $ 12,698  
                             
    COSTS AND EXPENSES                        
    Purchases and related costs   11,227             11,227         11,558             11,558  
    Field operating costs   578             578         363             363  
    General and administrative expenses   93       1       94         87       1       88  
    Depreciation and amortization   258             258         273             273  
    (Gains)/losses on asset sales, asset impairments and other, net   159             159         (9 )           (9 )
    Total costs and expenses   12,315       1       12,316         12,272       1       12,273  
                             
    OPERATING INCOME   87       (1 )     86         426       (1 )     425  
                             
    OTHER INCOME/(EXPENSE)                        
    Equity earnings in unconsolidated entities   154             154         92             92  
    Gain on investments in unconsolidated entities, net   15             15                      
    Interest expense, net   (112 )     17       (95 )       (97 )           (97 )
    Other income, net   20       (17 )     3         17             17  
                             
    INCOME BEFORE TAX   164       (1 )     163         438       (1 )     437  
    Current income tax expense   (52 )           (52 )       (41 )           (41 )
    Deferred income tax (expense)/benefit   7       (2 )     5         2       (16 )     (14 )
                             
    NET INCOME   119       (3 )     116         399       (17 )     382  
    Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests   (83 )     (44 )     (127 )       (87 )     (243 )     (330 )
    NET INCOME/(LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO PAGP $ 36     $ (47 )   $ (11 )     $ 312     $ (260 )   $ 52  
                             
    Basic and diluted weighted average Class A shares outstanding     197                 196  
                             
    Basic and diluted net income/(loss) per Class A share   $ (0.05 )             $ 0.27  
         
    (1)  Represents the aggregate consolidating adjustments necessary to produce consolidated financial statements for PAGP.
         
    PLAINS GP HOLDINGS AND SUBSIDIARIES
    FINANCIAL SUMMARY (unaudited)
    CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
    (in millions, except per share data)
             
      Twelve Months Ended
    December 31, 2024
        Twelve Months Ended
    December 31, 2023
          Consolidating             Consolidating    
      PAA   Adjustments (1)   PAGP     PAA   Adjustments (1)   PAGP
    REVENUES $ 50,073     $     $ 50,073       $ 48,712     $     $ 48,712  
                             
    COSTS AND EXPENSES                        
    Purchases and related costs   45,560             45,560         44,531             44,531  
    Field operating costs   1,768             1,768         1,425             1,425  
    General and administrative expenses   381       6       387         350       6       356  
    Depreciation and amortization   1,026             1,026         1,048       3       1,051  
    (Gains)/losses on asset sales, asset impairments and other, net   160             160         (152 )           (152 )
    Total costs and expenses   48,895       6       48,901         47,202       9       47,211  
                             
    OPERATING INCOME   1,178       (6 )     1,172         1,510       (9 )     1,501  
                             
    OTHER INCOME/(EXPENSE)                        
    Equity earnings in unconsolidated entities   452             452         369             369  
    Gain on investments in unconsolidated entities, net   15             15         28             28  
    Interest expense, net   (430 )     48       (382 )       (386 )           (386 )
    Other income, net   65       (48 )     17         102             102  
                             
    INCOME BEFORE TAX   1,280       (6 )     1,274         1,623       (9 )     1,614  
    Current income tax expense   (195 )           (195 )       (145 )           (145 )
    Deferred income tax (expense)/benefit   28       (37 )     (9 )       24       (68 )     (44 )
                             
    NET INCOME   1,113       (43 )     1,070         1,502       (77 )     1,425  
    Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests   (341 )     (626 )     (967 )       (272 )     (955 )     (1,227 )
    NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO PAGP $ 772     $ (669 )   $ 103       $ 1,230     $ (1,032 )   $ 198  
                             
    Basic and diluted weighted average Class A shares outstanding     197                 195  
                             
    Basic and diluted net income per Class A share   $ 0.52               $ 1.01  
         
    (1)  Represents the aggregate consolidating adjustments necessary to produce consolidated financial statements for PAGP.
         
    PLAINS GP HOLDINGS AND SUBSIDIARIES
    FINANCIAL SUMMARY (unaudited)
    CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET DATA
    (in millions)
             
      December 31, 2024     December 31, 2023
          Consolidating             Consolidating    
      PAA   Adjustments (1)   PAGP     PAA   Adjustments (1)   PAGP
    ASSETS                        
    Current assets $ 4,802     $ (26 )   $ 4,776       $ 4,913     $ 3     $ 4,916  
    Property and equipment, net   15,424             15,424         15,782             15,782  
    Investments in unconsolidated entities   2,811             2,811         2,820             2,820  
    Intangible assets, net   1,677             1,677         1,875             1,875  
    Deferred tax asset         1,220       1,220               1,239       1,239  
    Linefill   968             968         976             976  
    Long-term operating lease right-of-use assets, net   332             332         313             313  
    Long-term inventory   280             280         265             265  
    Other long-term assets, net   268             268         411             411  
    Total assets $ 26,562     $ 1,194     $ 27,756       $ 27,355     $ 1,242     $ 28,597  
                             
    LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL                        
    Current liabilities $ 4,950     $ (26 )   $ 4,924       $ 5,003     $ 2     $ 5,005  
    Senior notes, net   7,141             7,141         7,242             7,242  
    Other long-term debt, net   72             72         63             63  
    Long-term operating lease liabilities   313             313         274             274  
    Other long-term liabilities and deferred credits   990             990         1,041             1,041  
    Total liabilities   13,466       (26 )     13,440         13,623       2       13,625  
                             
    Partners’ capital excluding noncontrolling interests   9,813       (8,462 )     1,351         10,422       (8,874 )     1,548  
    Noncontrolling interests   3,283       9,682       12,965         3,310       10,114       13,424  
    Total partners’ capital   13,096       1,220       14,316         13,732       1,240       14,972  
    Total liabilities and partners’ capital $ 26,562     $ 1,194     $ 27,756       $ 27,355     $ 1,242     $ 28,597  
         
    (1)  Represents the aggregate consolidating adjustments necessary to produce consolidated financial statements for PAGP.
         
    PLAINS GP HOLDINGS AND SUBSIDIARIES
    FINANCIAL SUMMARY (unaudited)
    COMPUTATION OF BASIC AND DILUTED NET INCOME/(LOSS) PER CLASS A SHARE
    (in millions, except per share data)
           
      Three Months Ended
    December 31,
      Twelve Months Ended
    December 31,
      2024   2023
      2024
      2023
    Basic and Diluted Net Income/(Loss) per Class A Share              
    Net income/(loss) attributable to PAGP $ (11 )   $ 52     $ 103     $ 198  
    Basic and diluted weighted average Class A shares outstanding   197       196       197       195  
                   
    Basic and diluted net income/(loss) per Class A share $ (0.05 )   $ 0.27     $ 0.52     $ 1.01  
                                   

    Forward-Looking Statements

    Except for the historical information contained herein, the matters discussed in this release consist of forward-looking statements that involve certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results or outcomes to differ materially from results or outcomes anticipated in the forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, among other things, the following:

    • general economic, market or business conditions in the United States and elsewhere (including the potential for a recession or significant slowdown in economic activity levels, the risk of persistently high inflation and supply chain issues, the impact of global public health events, such as pandemics, on demand and growth, and the timing, pace and extent of economic recovery) that impact (i) demand for crude oil, drilling and production activities and therefore the demand for the midstream services we provide and (ii) commercial opportunities available to us;
    • declines in global crude oil demand and/or crude oil prices or other factors that correspondingly lead to a significant reduction of North American crude oil and NGL production (whether due to reduced producer cash flow to fund drilling activities or the inability of producers to access capital, or both, the unavailability of pipeline and/or storage capacity, the shutting-in of production by producers, government-mandated pro-ration orders, or other factors), which in turn could result in significant declines in the actual or expected volume of crude oil and NGL shipped, processed, purchased, stored, fractionated and/or gathered at or through the use of our assets and/or the reduction of the margins we can earn or the commercial opportunities that might otherwise be available to us;
    • fluctuations in refinery capacity and other factors affecting demand for various grades of crude oil and NGL and resulting changes in pricing conditions or transportation throughput requirements;
    • unanticipated changes in crude oil and NGL market structure, grade differentials and volatility (or lack thereof);
    • the effects of competition and capacity overbuild in areas where we operate, including downward pressure on rates, volumes and margins, contract renewal risk and the risk of loss of business to other midstream operators who are willing or under pressure to aggressively reduce transportation rates in order to capture or preserve customers;
    • the successful operation of joint ventures and joint operating arrangements we enter into from time to time, whether relating to assets operated by us or by third parties, and the successful integration and future performance of acquired assets or businesses;
    • the availability of, and our ability to consummate, acquisitions, divestitures, joint ventures or other strategic opportunities and realize benefits therefrom;
    • environmental liabilities, litigation or other events that are not covered by an indemnity, insurance or existing reserves;
    • negative societal sentiment regarding the hydrocarbon energy industry and the continued development and consumption of hydrocarbons, which could influence consumer preferences and governmental or regulatory actions that adversely impact our business;
    • the occurrence of a natural disaster, catastrophe, terrorist attack (including eco-terrorist attacks) or other event that materially impacts our operations, including cyber or other attacks on our or our service providers’ electronic and computer systems;
    • weather interference with business operations or project construction, including the impact of extreme weather events or conditions (including wildfires and drought);
    • the impact of current and future laws, rulings, legislation, governmental regulations, executive orders, trade policies, tariffs, accounting standards and statements, and related interpretations that (i) prohibit, restrict or regulate the development of oil and gas resources and the related infrastructure on lands dedicated to or served by our pipelines, (ii) negatively impact our ability to develop, operate or repair midstream assets, or (iii) otherwise negatively impact our business or increase our exposure to risk;
    • negative impacts on production levels in the Permian Basin or elsewhere due to issues associated with (or laws, rules or regulations relating to) hydraulic fracturing and related activities (including wastewater injection or disposal), including earthquakes, subsidence, expansion or other issues;
    • the pace of development of natural gas or other infrastructure and its impact on expected crude oil production growth in the Permian Basin;
    • the refusal or inability of our customers or counterparties to perform their obligations under their contracts with us (including commercial contracts, asset sale agreements and other agreements), whether justified or not and whether due to financial constraints (such as reduced creditworthiness, liquidity issues or insolvency), market constraints, legal constraints (including governmental orders or guidance), the exercise of contractual or common law rights that allegedly excuse their performance (such as force majeure or similar claims) or other factors;
    • loss of key personnel and inability to attract and retain new talent;
    • disruptions to futures markets for crude oil, NGL and other petroleum products, which may impair our ability to execute our commercial or hedging strategies;
    • the effectiveness of our risk management activities;
    • shortages or cost increases of supplies, materials or labor;
    • maintenance of our credit ratings and ability to receive open credit from our suppliers and trade counterparties;
    • our inability to perform our obligations under our contracts, whether due to non-performance by third parties, including our customers or counterparties, market constraints, third-party constraints, supply chain issues, legal constraints (including governmental orders or guidance), or other factors or events;
    • the incurrence of costs and expenses related to unexpected or unplanned capital or maintenance expenditures, third-party claims or other factors;
    • failure to implement or capitalize, or delays in implementing or capitalizing, on investment capital projects, whether due to permitting delays, permitting withdrawals or other factors;
    • tightened capital markets or other factors that increase our cost of capital or limit our ability to obtain debt or equity financing on satisfactory terms to fund additional acquisitions, investment capital projects, working capital requirements and the repayment or refinancing of indebtedness;
    • the amplification of other risks caused by volatile or closed financial markets, capital constraints, liquidity concerns and inflation;
    • the use or availability of third-party assets upon which our operations depend and over which we have little or no control;
    • the currency exchange rate of the Canadian dollar to the United States dollar;
    • inability to recognize current revenue attributable to deficiency payments received from customers who fail to ship or move more than minimum contracted volumes until the related credits expire or are used;
    • significant under-utilization of our assets and facilities;
    • increased costs, or lack of availability, of insurance;
    • fluctuations in the debt and equity markets, including the price of our units at the time of vesting under our long-term incentive plans;
    • risks related to the development and operation of our assets; and
    • other factors and uncertainties inherent in the transportation, storage, terminalling and marketing of crude oil, as well as in the processing, transportation, fractionation, storage and marketing of NGL as discussed in the Partnerships’ filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

    About Plains:

    PAA is a publicly traded master limited partnership that owns and operates midstream energy infrastructure and provides logistics services for crude oil and natural gas liquids (“NGL”). PAA owns an extensive network of pipeline gathering and transportation systems, in addition to terminalling, storage, processing, fractionation and other infrastructure assets serving key producing basins, transportation corridors and major market hubs and export outlets in the United States and Canada. On average, PAA handles over 8 million barrels per day of crude oil and NGL.

    PAGP is a publicly traded entity that owns an indirect, non-economic controlling general partner interest in PAA and an indirect limited partner interest in PAA, one of the largest energy infrastructure and logistics companies in North America.

    PAA and PAGP are headquartered in Houston, Texas. For more information, please visit www.plains.com.

    Contacts:

    Blake Fernandez
    Vice President, Investor Relations
    (866) 809-1291
     
    Michael Gladstein
    Director, Investor Relations
    (866) 809-1291

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: BFCM – 2024 Full year results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)


    Results for the year ended December 31, 2024 Press Release
      Strasbourg, February 6, 2025
    Results for the year ended December 31, 2024 2024 2023 Change 2024/2023
    RECORD NET REVENUE €12.370bn €11.808bn         +4.8%
    of which retail banking €8.413bn €8.410bn         0.0%
    of which specialized business lines €2.916bn €2.563bn         +13.8%
    GENERAL OPERATING EXPENSES UNDER CONTROL
    POSITIVE SCISSOR EFFECT
    -€6.268bn -€6.057bn         +3.5%
    HIGHER COST OF RISK DUE TO THE ECONOMIC CLIMATE AND INCREASED PROVISIONS -€1.807bn -€1.279bn         +41.3%
    NET INCOME AT RECORD LEVEL €3.412bn €3.345bn         +2.0%
    GROWTH IN LENDING1
    Home loans Equipment loans and leasing Consumer credit
    €120.7bn €117.2bn €48.2bn
    0.0% +3.0% +5.7%
    SOLID FINANCIAL STRUCTURE
    CET1 Ratio2 Shareholders’ equity
    18.8% €45.20bn

    Download the press releas: Press Releases | Banque Fédérative du Crédit Mutuel

    Press contact :

    Aziz Ridouan: +33(0)6 01 10 31 69 – aziz.ridouan@creditmutuel.fr

    Press contact: +33 (0)3 88 14 84 00 – com-alliancefederale@creditmutuel.fr

    Investor contact :

    Banque Fédérative du Crédit Mutuel – bfcm-web@creditmutuel.fr

    1 Changes in outstandings calculated over 12 months. 2 Ratio estimated at December 31, 2024 for Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale which includes BFCM in its scope of consolidation. The integration of earnings into shareholders’ equity is subject to approval by the ECB.

    Attachment

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Minister Rishworth interview on 3AW drive with Jacqui Felgate

    Source: Ministers for Social Services

    E&OE TRANSCRIPT

    Topics: NDIS; NDIS fraud; Investment in Saver Plus.

    JACQUI FELGATE, HOST:    I do want to touch base now, though, on the NDIS, because I think it’s a really important issue and it’s one that a lot of victims in this case and a lot of people with disabilities and special needs that needed help under the last system didn’t get it. It’s now in the hands of Amanda Rishworth, who’s the new Minister for the NDIS following the retirement of Labor MP Bill Shorten. So, for the first time on 3AW, she joins me now. Minister, really appreciate your time.

    AMANDA RISHWORTH, MINISTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES:    Great to be with you.

    AMANDA RISHWORTH:    Well, what it means in practical terms is that if someone has a permanent and significant disability, what they can do is go to see a planner at the NDIS and they will make an assessment and give you funding to buy in a whole range of individualised supports. So, that might be therapy supports like physiotherapy, it might be personal care or nursing. It might be equipment like a wheelchair. Previously to the NDIS, people just used to get allocated a wheelchair or told to go to a certain place and that’s where they could get their physiotherapy. When the NDIS came in, you got funding in which the person with the disability could go and then find a provider and spend the money they were allocated to get that service. So, it provided a lot more control for people with disability. It has changed so many people’s lives, but it’s very individualistic, so it is what you need as an individual. And so it is quite complex at times and can be difficult to navigate, but it really has changed so many people’s lives because it’s provided an individualised support for people that need it.

    JACQUI FELGATE:    So, when you say complex, we do know the system has been fraught with problems to the point of alleged fraud as well. Last year, when we spoke to a lot of, particularly parents of young children, they felt like their funding had been reduced or cut unnecessarily. Are you going through all of those cases on an individual basis and can you reassure people that those who really need it are going to get the funding?

    AMANDA RISHWORTH:    Firstly, I would say that as Minister, the NDIS review process happens independently for me. But I can say and give your listeners reassurance, there haven’t been any changes around the rules in which young children are assessed. What there has been a change to is a list of what’s in and can be funded by the NDIS and what’s out of that list. And that was about making sure that the NDIS funds were actually used appropriately. There are a lot of things that were on that list that, you know, salt therapy was one of these things. There’s no evidence for that. But when it comes to children, there have been no changes around access and what can be funded under the scheme. There’s an individualised assessment to that and that’s really important. But there haven’t been any changes to what can be funded.

    JACQUI FELGATE:    And what about the rorts and the fraud? How can you guarantee that that won’t happen in the future?

    AMANDA RISHWORTH:    Look, some of the cases, particularly service providers that have been acting appallingly, was really shocking. So, we have, as under the previous Minister, set up what was called the Fraud Fusion Task Force, which actually brought together intel from a range of agencies, the AFP, the NDIA and a whole range of structures to deal with fraud. And so that continues do its work to make sure it’s identifying dodgy actors in this and hold them to account. And we have a number of ongoing investigations and referrals for prosecution. But some of the other work that’s been really important to make sure that this money gets used wisely is making sure people understand what can be funded and what can’t be, particularly service providers. They need to understand and give the right advice. So, the other element I’m really keen on is driving up quality. So, this isn’t just bad actors in the scheme, this is actually making sure that every participant, when they spend their NDIS money, get a high quality service, that there’s appropriate safeguards and protections in place as well.

    JACQUI FELGATE:    So, how do you think it got to that point, though, where we heard the most ridiculous examples and we heard the most desperate examples of people who really needed help but couldn’t get it? And then the rorts, like how did it allow over all these years, how did that get to that point, Minister?

    AMANDA RISHWORTH:    Well, people just weren’t paying attention. I mean, ultimately you heard stories the…

    JACQUI FELGATE:    The former Minister wasn’t paying attention?

    AMANDA RISHWORTH:    The former government wasn’t paying attention. I mean, when Minister Shorten came into this portfolio, he identified very quickly that there had been no checks and balances, that there hadn’t been proper oversight over this scheme. It had been left just to meander and there hadn’t been the appropriate protections put in place. So, Minister Shorten himself identified this very quickly and has stood up a whole range of oversight mechanisms to look at this. So, it really was the previous government…

    JACQUI FELGATE:    You can’t always blame the previous government, though, you have been in power for nearly four years.

    AMANDA RISHWORTH:    Well, you know about the challenges because we’ve identified them. You know about these cases that have happened over the last two years because they haven’t got away with it. I mean, that’s ultimately why, you know about these circumstances, why we’ve seen some of the articles in the paper, is because we have now got the oversight mechanisms to identify them and take them to court. So, we do need to maintain vigilance on this. It is critically important, but it’s also important that people don’t get dodgy service and there is quality services out there as well.

    JACQUI FELGATE:    Okay, so what’s the Saver Plus program and how’s that going to make a difference?

    AMANDA RISHWORTH:    The Saver Plus program is separate from the NDIS. This is a really important program where people that may be wanting to get a bit more financial capability to have matched savings with the ANZ Bank. We have just funded this program. It’s been going for 21 years. We’ve now extended their funding for another five years. It’s funded through the Brotherhood of St Laurence and really does support people become financially resilient and support them for really good saving habits. So, it’s a really good program. And I’m really pleased that today we’ve announced extra funding for that.

    JACQUI FELGATE:    Amanda Rishworth is the Minister for Social Services and the NDIS. Really appreciate your time, Minister.

    AMANDA RISHWORTH:    Thank you.

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Interview – Afternoon Briefing with Patricia Karvelas

    Source: Australian Executive Government Ministers

    PATRICIA KARVELAS, HOST: To discuss this and more, let’s bring in one of our regulars, Early Childhood Education Minister Anne Aly, who’s also been promoted in the latest reshuffle. Welcome.

    MINISTER ANNE ALY: Thank you so much, Patricia. Great to be with you.

    KARVELAS: We’re going to start there because that’s the big talking point around the world. A bit of clarification from Marco Rubio. Does that sound like a better plan that the US would redevelop Gaza?

    ALY: Well, look, I want to start by first of all, Patricia, if I may, acknowledging the significant pain and distress that this caused to Palestinians across the world, particularly as they’re preparing to return to their homeland. You know, certainly I think there is, there needs to be a concerted effort across the world to rebuild Gaza. And in fact, when I was at the conference in Jordan last year, that was on the table already, the countries that were represented there were talking about psychosocial recovery and rebuilding Gaza – what happens in rebuilding Gaza. So, I think, you know, it will take significant effort from right around the world for rebuilding Gaza. But in terms of, you know, the position that this government has around a two-state solution, inherent in that two-state solution is a self-determination for Palestinian people and the right of return.

    KARVELAS: So, that means that you would never accept Gazans being pushed off or Palestinians being pushed off that land in Gaza.

    ALY: I think the response that we’ve had from across the world to President Trump’s statement yesterday makes it very clear that it is widely accepted that Palestinians have a right of return to their homeland.

    KARVELAS: But you mentioned, which I thought was really interesting. You often say interesting things, Minister —

    ALY: I do, do I?

    KARVELAS: You do, that you want to acknowledge the hurt and the concern because there was.

    ALY: There was right, it was, yeah.

    KARVELAS: Just talk to me about that concern.

    ALY: So, I think, you know, like just even talking to Palestinians in the community and to the community more broadly here in Australia, there was a real sense of shock and a real sense of, yeah, real concern that, you know, this could mean that there would basically an eradication of a Palestinian state when we’ve long held the principle of a two-state solution with a right of return and self-determination for Palestinian people. And I think, you know, if I were a Palestinian person preparing to return to my homeland, one of the things that we want to make sure of in Australia and you know, this government has done that consistently in the votes that we’ve done in the UN and the actions that we’ve taken is to ensure that this current ceasefire is sustainable and long-lasting and that there is an enduring peace for both Palestinians and Israelis.

    KARVELAS: So, given how strong your comments have been about the Palestinians right to return, there has been a criticism that the Prime Minister could have used stronger words. Other foreign leaders who are also allies of the United States have used stronger words. Do you understand that frustration?

    ALY: Look, I listened to the Prime Minister yesterday and I think he was quite correct in reiterating that we have a long-standing position that we’re not changing, which is a two-state solution. And I think, you know, anybody could listen to that and recognise what the Prime Minister is saying is that we believe in the right and we support the right of Palestine and Palestinians and Gazans to exist in their homeland.

    KARVELAS: And now you’re kind of, you know, being pretty empathetic about how people heard that and their ongoing concerns. Is it important that the government makes that clear? Because I saw all those concerns too.

    ALY: Yeah. And I think, I think, you know, we have made it clear, I think —

    KARVELAS: I feel like you’re making it clearer.

    ALY: Well, I think the actions that we’ve taken that the Foreign Minister, Penny Wong, has taken, the votes that we’ve had in the United Nations, have sent a very clear message that we stand for human rights and that we stand for justice and that we stand for a two-state solution and an everlasting peace.

    KARVELAS: I just want to move to some other issues because there are lots of issues in our country.

    ALY: So many.

    KARVELAS: There are. The Australian Federal Police has just spoken in a committee hearing. They have not given any detail as to, basically there’s no answers on when they briefed the Prime Minister on this caravan attack. Shouldn’t the Prime Minister just say it, or the Opposition says, call an inquiry?

    ALY: Well, I think what we need to do here is take the lead from the law enforcement agencies because in an investigation, it’s the law enforcement agencies that take the lead. And we have to, we absolutely have to respect the integrity of the law enforcement agencies and support them to do their work. As you know, Patricia, I’ve got a husband in law enforcement. I know exactly what he can and can’t tell me. Most of the time he can’t tell me anything. Like we do not talk about the investigations that he is undertaking in any capacity. So, when the law enforcement agencies say that we did not want this information out there because it is an ongoing investigation and could compromise the investigation, we need to respect that.

    KARVELAS: But telling the Prime Minister is a different thing.

    ALY: Well, I think, you know, I don’t think it’s here nor there. I’ve not had a single person say to me, hey, I want to know when the Prime Minister found out. So, I think it’s a little bit of a Canberra bubble —

    KARVELAS: Oh, a Canberra story.

    ALY: Yeah.

    KARVELAS: Ok. I don’t want to just labour on that because there are other things Labor did break with your policy, which is a national platform to oppose mandatory sentencing. Former Labor Senator Kim Carr has criticised the party and said, this is profoundly disappointing. What’s your response to that?

    ALY: Okay, so I’ve got a bit of a different response, Patricia, because I know the impact of hate crimes personally and as a member of a community that has been the target of hate crimes. That to me, hate crimes are some of the most heinous crimes. When you target an individual or a group because of who they are, because of their identity, whether it’s religious, racial, gender, sexual, whatever, to me, that’s one of the most heinous and cowardly crimes that you can commit. So, I want to see, I want to see us get tough on hate crimes. I support being tough on hate crimes and I think what we’ve seen recently, the escalation in the kinds of hate crimes that we’ve seen, warrants this kind of action by the Government.

    KARVELAS: So, you want. Instead of – because I know some people in the party are concerned, you want the mandatory sentences.

    ALY: I want to see us to be tough on hate crimes. And you know, I’ve been there. I know, I know the impact that it has. So, I want us to get tough on hate crimes and I know that right now Jewish Australians are the victims of a lot of hate crimes as well. And I want —

    KARVELAS: The Law Council says it’s bad policy.

    ALY: Well, people will have their different opinions. I will also say, though, that, you know, we know laws don’t change behaviour. The prevention of hate crimes and vilification in all its forms is a responsibility for every single person. It’s about societal change as well.

    KARVELAS: Okay, let’s get to some of your issues before we say goodbye. Child care is obviously one of the areas that you focus on. The government has decided to put this bill, which would mean three days of care without activity testing, where you get the rebate, essentially, through the Parliament. Do you expect it to pass in the next fortnight?

    ALY: I do. I hope it will pass [the House]. I know that there is widespread support for this from the sector. It is a recommendation of the PC Review. And you know what? It’s just good policy. It’s good policy that when you have people in a partnership, one works full time, one might work two days a week in casual, and they’re not eligible for subsidised care. It has locked out children from early childhood education and care and locked out families from being able to access the childcare subsidy. It’s good policy. It has good support, and I do, and I look forward to seeing it pass.

    KARVELAS: But it doesn’t have to pass. It doesn’t even start till next year. So, is it a wedge to try and get the Coalition to actively vote against it?

    ALY: Well, I don’t know what the Coalition’s position is —

    KARVELAS: They think that you should have to be earning or, you know, working or studying to get the activity test.

    ALY: Well, the thing is, you can be working or studying to get the activity test but still might not meet the activity test. And the other thing is the activity test, when it was introduced in 2018 by the Liberals, it was supposed to be to increase workforce participation. It did none of that. Instead, it locked out some of the most vulnerable children from early childhood education and care. We’re fixing that. We’re making sure that every child has access to opportunity because there should be no barriers to opportunity.

    KARVELAS: Anne Aly, always a pleasure to speak to you. Thanks for joining us.

    ALY: You too. Thanks so much, Patricia.
     

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI Security: First Two Defendants in Omaha Methamphetamine Conspiracy Sentenced

    Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) State Crime Alerts (b)

    United States Attorney Susan T. Lehr announced that Jody D. Webb, age 45, of Lincoln, Nebraska and Jason Unruh, age 51, of Omaha, Nebraska were sentenced on January 31, 2025, in federal court in Omaha for their roles in a conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine. Chief United States District Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. sentenced Webb to 75 months’ and Unruh to 188 months’ imprisonment. There is no parole in the federal system. After their release from prison, Webb will begin a 2-year term of supervised release, and Unruh a 5-year term of supervised release.

    On August 3, 2023, FBI surveillance observed Unruh meet with codefendant Jonathan Ovalle-Solis. During the observed meet, Unruh entered Ovalle’s vehicle and exited with a package of what appeared to be a white substance in a clear bag. This deal was recorded.

    A subsequent TextNow search warrant on the phone number belonging to codefendant Ovalle-Solis and his known Mexican meth source of supply, confirmed that Unruh was coordinating with the Mexican source to buy a pound of meth. Messages showed Unruh would pick up pound quantities of meth on multiple occasions in August and September of 2023.  The messages from the Mexican source to Unruh would typically give an address and vehicle description of who Unruh was to meet for meth deliveries.

    On October 17, 2023, law enforcement officers were investigating this same drug trafficking organization when they observed Webb meet with a suspected drug courier. After the meet officers conducted a traffic stop on Webb who had approximately 2 pounds of meth in her vehicle. Messages obtained from a phone search warrant confirmed that Webb had arranged the 2-pound deal with the same Mexican source of supply.

    Jonathan Ovalle Solis pleaded guilty to drug conspiracy and is scheduled to be sentenced on February 14, 2025.

    This case was the result of an investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: Former Federal Juror Sentenced to 30 Days for Contempt of Court

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    Hagatña, Guam – SHAWN N. ANDERSON, United States Attorney for the Districts of Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands, announced that defendant, Gregorio Concepcion Tyquienco, age 72, was sentenced on February 4, 2025, in the District Court of Guam to 30 days imprisonment followed by one year of supervised release for Contempt of Court, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 401(3).  The Court ordered Tyquiengco to pay $1,537.04 as restitution (representing the fees and mileage paid to him as a juror during a trial), a $2,000 fine, and a mandatory $25 special assessment fee.

    Tyquienco was a juror in the trial of United States vs. Raymond John Martinez and Juanita Marie Quitugua Moser in the District Court of Guam.  Between October 11, 2018, and December 27, 2018, Tyquienco knowingly disobeyed the Court’s instruction not to discuss the case with anyone outside of the jury’s deliberative process.  During the trial, and prior to jury deliberation, Tyquienco discussed what verdict he would render with brothers William Topasna Mantanona and John T. Mantanona, aka “Boom.”  Tyquienco knew Boom was working as a member of the defense team.  He knew Boom previously but did not disclose the association to the Court.  Tyquienco was asked by William and Boom to be the jury foreman and to issue a “Not Guilty” verdict regardless of the evidence.  These discussions violated the clear and specific daily orders of the Honorable Frances Tydingco-Gatewood, Chief Judge, District Court of Guam.  After a mistrial was declared, Boom met with Tyquiengco and gave him $1,100 in cash.

    “Jury tampering is an affront to the Rule of Law,” stated United States Attorney Anderson.  “Our citizens and the accused expect fair legal proceedings that result in justice.  Jurors and witnesses make great sacrifices to fulfil this important civic duty.  This case sends a message that the Department of Justice will hold accountable those who violate this public trust.”

    “The integrity and impartiality of jurors and their deliberations are essential to our criminal justice system,” said FBI Honolulu Special Agent in Charge David Porter. “Those who tamper with this important civic responsibility attempt to deny our communities the justice they deserve. As reflected by this investigation, the FBI is committed to protecting our legal processes and will bring to justice those who act to corrupt it.”

    The case was investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Rosetta L. San Nicolas in the District of Guam.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI USA: Kennedy, Moran champion bill to protect veterans’ Second Amendment rights

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator John Kennedy (Louisiana)

    WASHINGTON – Sens. John Kennedy (R-La.) and Jerry Moran (R-Kan.), Chairman of the Senate Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, today led 14 colleagues in introducing the Veterans 2nd Amendment Protection Act. The bill would prevent veterans from losing their Second Amendment right to purchase or own firearms when they receive help managing their Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) benefits.

    “Our veterans should not receive less due process rights than other Americans just because they served our country and asked the federal government for a helping hand. Under the VA’s interpretation of the law, however, unelected bureaucrats punish Louisiana and America’s veterans by forcing them to choose between their Second Amendment rights and getting the help they need as they manage their financial affairs. I’m proud to introduce the Veterans 2nd Amendment Protection Act to stand up for veterans’ constitutional rights by ending this unfair practice,” said Kennedy.

    “Veterans should never be forced to choose between receiving assistance from VA to manage their benefits and their fundamental Second Amendment rights. Our nation should be encouraging veterans to utilize VA services, not discouraging them by denying them due process. The Veterans Second Amendment Protection Act makes certain that the rights of those who have served are protected, and that veterans are not penalized for receiving support that they have earned and deserve. I thank Sen. Kennedy for his partnership in this effort,” said Moran. 

    Rep. Mike Bost (R-Ill.), Chairman of the House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, introduced the bill in the House of Representatives.

    “It should go without saying that veterans should not be treated like second-class citizens simply because they need help managing their books—but under current law they are. Without a permanent fix in place, VA bureaucrats can continue to strip veterans with fiduciaries of their Second Amendment right with no court ruling in place that they are a danger to themselves or others. It’s as simple as that. I have heard from too many veterans that VA’s current NICS reporting measures prevent them from seeking mental health care at VA—we must change that. I want to thank Chairman Moran, Senator Kennedy, and my House colleagues for working with me last Congress to pass a temporary solution, but veterans need a permanent fix. House and Senate Republicans will fulfill the American people’s mandate to get this bill to President Trump’s desk to protect veterans’ due process and constitutional rights for good,” said Bost. 

    Sens. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), Steve Daines (R-Mont.), Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.), Pete Ricketts (R-Neb.), Mike Rounds (S.D.), Kevin Cramer (N.D.), Jim Banks (R-Ind.), Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), Bill Cassidy (R-La.), John Boozman (R-Ark.), Rick Scott (R-Fla.), Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.), Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) and Tim Sheehy (R-Mont.) cosponsored the legislation.

    “I take the constitutional right to bear arms very seriously. Our bill would preserve due process for veterans and put a stop to unelected bureaucrats unjustifiably stripping away the Second Amendment rights of those who’ve served,” said Grassley.

    “Veterans must not be required to forfeit the Second Amendment without a careful, constitutional process. Attempting to deprive former servicemembers of firearms for protection or recreation simply because they require assistance managing the benefits they have earned is bureaucracy at its worst. Our legislation would correct this injustice and preserve these law-abiding patriots’ rights,” said Boozman.

    “The veterans who served our country shouldn’t lose their 2nd Amendment rights just because they need financial help,” said Cassidy.

    “Veterans who have served our country deserve the same Second Amendment rights and protections as every other American. This commonsense legislation ensures that veterans aren’t punished simply because they need assistance managing their benefits and guarantees they are not denied their constitutional rights without due process,” said Tillis. 

    “Our veterans have sacrificed so much to defend this great country, and it is critical their God-given right to protect themselves and their families doesn’t rest on judgement of unelected bureaucrats. It takes a lot of courage and humility for our brave veterans to admit that they need help managing their financial benefits. But it shouldn’t place their constitutional freedoms in jeopardy. This bill ends the ability of government workers to take away the Second Amendment freedoms of our veterans when they ask for help with their money unless a judge finds them to be a danger to himself or others. I stand with our veterans and will continue to fight to preserve the freedoms they fought for on the battlefield,” said Tuberville.

    “I’m proud to stand with our veterans to ensure equal protection of their rights with the Second Amendment Protection Act. Our veterans have fought to protect our nation and defend our rights, and they deserve to be treated fairly with the same due process under the law,” said Scott.

    Because of the VA’s interpretation of current law, the VA sends a beneficiary’s name to the FBI’s National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) whenever a fiduciary is appointed to help a beneficiary manage his or her VA benefit payments.

    Ultimately, VA employees decide whether veterans receive help from a fiduciary.

    The bill would prohibit the Secretary of Veterans Affairs from transmitting a veteran’s personal information to NICS unless a relevant judicial authority rules that the beneficiary is a danger to himself or others.

    Vietnam Veterans of America, National Association of County Veterans Service Officers, Veterans of Foreign Wars, The American Legion, Black Veterans Empowerment Council, Military Order of the Purple Heart, National Shooting Sports Foundation, National Rifle Association, Gun Owners of America, AMAC Action, Turning Point Action, Firearms Regulatory Accountability Coalition, National Disability Rights Network and the National Association for Gun Rights support the Veterans 2nd Amendment Protection Act.

    Background:

    • In the 116th Congress, Kennedy introduced the Veterans 2nd Amendment Protection Act. 
    • In the 118th Congress, Kennedy and Moran re-introduced the Veterans 2nd Amendment Protection Act with six co-sponsors. 
    • In Oct. 2023, the Senate passed Kennedy and Moran’s amendment to the Consolidated Appropriations Act based on the Veterans 2nd Amendment Protection Act. The same language passed into law as part of an appropriations package in March 2024.
    • The language included in the appropriations package only provided a temporary solution tied to appropriations. The Veterans 2nd Amendment Protection Act would make the fix permanent and prevent future VA administrations from undoing the work to restore veterans’ due process and Second Amendment rights. 

    The bill text is available here.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Security: Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Deputy Found Guilty of Federal Civil Rights Violation for Using Excessive Force Against Woman

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    LOS ANGELES – A Los Angeles County Sheriff’s deputy was found guilty by a jury today of using excessive force when he assaulted and pepper-sprayed a woman outside a supermarket in Lancaster in June 2023.

    Trevor James Kirk, 32, of Santa Clarita, was found guilty of one felony count of deprivation of rights under color of law. 

    According to evidence presented at a three-day trial, on June 24, 2023, Kirk and another deputy were responding to a possible robbery at a WinCo Foods supermarket by a man and a woman. Kirk and the other deputy arrived on scene and handcuffed and detained a man matching the description of the male suspect, while the victim, identified in court documents as “J.H.” – who matched the description of the female suspect – recorded the deputies on her cellphone. While recording, J.H. told Kirk that he had a legal obligation to inform the man of the basis for his detention and that she was broadcasting his actions on social media.

    Kirk then approached J.H. and, without giving any commands, attempted to grab her phone. J.H. turned away, at which point Kirk grabbed J.H. by her arm, hooked his left hand behind her neck, and violently threw her face first to the ground. While on the ground, Kirk yelled at J.H. to “get on the ground,” and she told him that “It’s already on YouTube Live,” implying her video of Kirk and the other deputy handcuffing D.B. had already been shared on social media.

    Kirk then placed his knee on J.H.’s shoulder and, when J.H. yelled for Kirk to “stop,” Kirk cocked his right arm back with a clenched fist and said, “Stop or you’re gonna get punched in the face.” Kirk then pressed his knee into J.H.’s neck, and she said, “Get your neck [sic] off my… off my… I can’t breathe.” While on top of J.H., Kirk used his LASD radio to give a misleading report that he was in a “fight.”

    Without giving any additional commands to J.H., Kirk pepper-sprayed her twice in the face. While Kirk pepper sprayed J.H., her hands were holding only prescription sunglasses and a cloth surgical mask. J.H. received medical attention for her injuries sustained from the pepper spray and from being thrown to the ground. J.H. was treated for blunt-force head trauma and injuries to her head, arms, and wrist. 

    United States District Judge Stephen V. Wilson scheduled an April 21, sentencing hearing, at which point Kirk will face a statutory maximum sentence of 10 years in federal prison.

    The FBI investigated this matter. The Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department assisted in the investigation.

    Assistant United States Attorneys Eli A. Alcaraz, Brian R. Faerstein and Michael J. Morse of the Public Corruption and Civil Rights Section prosecuted this case.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: South Lake Tahoe Man Sentenced to over 2 Years in Prison for Impersonating Federal Officers

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    SACRAMENTO, Calif. — Anton Andreyevich Iagounov, 38, of South Lake Tahoe, was sentenced today by U.S. District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta to two years and three months in prison for four counts of impersonating a federal officer, Acting U.S. Attorney Michele Beckwith announced.

    According to court documents, and evidence presented at a three-day trial in July 2024, Iagounov pretended to be a federal law enforcement agent by creating and sending counterfeit investigative documents, which he signed in the name of a fictional federal agent, seeking highly protected information from the Department of Defense.

    “The defendant impersonated federal officers and tried multiple times to obtain protected information using fake court documents,” said Acting U.S. Attorney Beckwith. “Many federal agencies including NASA have devoted law enforcement officers, and we will not tolerate federal officers being illegally impersonated.”

    “Mr. Iagounov’s attempt to undermine public trust in order to obtain sensitive government information posed a significant risk, potentially endangering national security and the integrity of NASA and government operations,” said Michael Graham, Acting Assistant Inspector General for Investigations. “This sentencing demonstrates the commitment of NASA OIG, the USAO, and our law enforcement partners to safeguarding Federal assets and holding accountable those who undermine justice.”

    “The defendant impersonated a federal law enforcement officer and took advantage of the trust that exists between federal agencies,” said Acting Special Agent in Charge Jeremy N. Schwartz of the FBI Las Vegas Division. “All officers carry badges and credentials that are used to verify their identity. If you believe someone is impersonating an officer, you may ask their agency to confirm their official business. This sentencing demonstrates the excellent work achievable through partnerships.”

    On July 5, 2022, Iagounov sent a search warrant he had created to the U.S. Capitol Police, falsely claiming it was signed by a Special Agent of NASA Office of Inspector General (NASA‑OIG) and appearing to be authorized by a U.S. District Court judge for the District of Columbia. The Capitol Police investigated the document, determined it was fake, and referred it to NASA-OIG for further investigation.

    On July 11, 2022, Iagounov again pretended to be the same fictional NASA-OIG agent and sent the warrant to the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. This time, he sent it without a judge’s signature, indicating it was for an “emergency filing” and required a judge’s signature. He sent it from an email address designed to look like it was from a United States government agency, but which Iagounov owned and had named to look like a government agency’s internet domain.

    On July 18, 2022, Iagounov again sent the fake search warrant, purporting to be signed by the same fictitious NASA-OIG agent. He sent it to the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Georgia, again indicating that it was for an emergency filing and needed a judge’s signature immediately.

    Finally, on July 24, 2022, Iagounov faxed a letter, under the name of a real NASA-OIG supervising agent, to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida. In that letter, he claimed to be following up on the warrant, stating that an “exigent circumstance” required a judge’s signature immediately. The faxed letter included an anonymous email address for the agent that actually belonged to Iagounov. Several days earlier, on July 15, Iagounov had sent his warrant to the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Florida but had received no response.

    In each case, given the apparently sensitive nature of the materials Iagounov’s warrant sought, the receiving personnel for the Courts referred the matter to NASA-OIG for review and investigation.

    This case was the product of an investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and NASA Office of Inspector General, with assistance by the South Lake Tahoe Police Department and the Carson City Sheriff’s Office. Assistant U.S. Attorneys James Conolly and Audrey Hemesath prosecuted the case. 

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: Sacramento and Fairfield Residents Indicted for Firearms Offenses

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    SACRAMENTO, Calif. — The Project Safe Neighborhoods (PSN) initiative brings together all levels of law enforcement and the communities they serve to reduce violent crime and gun violence. At the core of PSN is setting focused and strategic enforcement priorities that help prevent violence from occurring in the first place. Acting U.S. Attorney Michele Beckwith announces the following indictments in federal PSN cases.

    Marcus Anderson, 26, of Sacramento, was indicted today and charged with nine counts of firearms trafficking, unlicensed firearms dealing, and other firearms charges. According to court documents, from February 2022 to March 2023, Anderson unlawfully trafficked and possessed multiple firearms, and engaged in the business of unlawful firearms dealing in the Sacramento area. Anderson is prohibited from possessing firearms or ammunition because he has multiple state felony convictions. This case is the product of an investigation by the ATF with the assistance of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation’s Special Service Unit, the Placer County Special Investigations Unit, the Sacramento County Sheriff’s Office, and the Sacramento Police Department. Assistant U.S. Attorney Haddy Abouzeid is prosecuting the case.

    Armond Bass, 39, of Fairfield, was indicted on Jan. 23, 2025, and charged with two counts of being a felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition. According to court documents, in October 2024, Bass was found to have possessed a Colt .22‑caliber semi-automatic rifle and ammunition. Bass is prohibited from possessing firearms or ammunition because he has previous felony convictions for domestic violence, possession of a stolen vehicle, and possession of a controlled substance. This case is the product of an investigation by the FBI and the Vacaville Police Department, with assistance from the FBI’s Solano County Violent Crimes Task Force. Assistant U.S. Attorney Charles Campbell is prosecuting the case.

    If convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm or ammunition, the defendants face a maximum statutory penalty of 15 years in prison and a fine up to $250,000. Anderson also faces up to five years in prison, if convicted for unlicensed firearms dealing. Any sentence, however, would be determined at the discretion of the court after consideration of any applicable statutory factors and the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, which take into account a number of variables. The charges are only allegations; the defendants are presumed innocent until and unless proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

    These cases are part of Project Safe Neighborhoods (PSN), a program bringing together all levels of law enforcement and the communities they serve to reduce violent crime and gun violence, and to make our neighborhoods safer for everyone. On May 26, 2021, the U.S. Department of Justice launched a violent crime reduction strategy strengthening PSN based on these core principles: fostering trust and legitimacy in our communities, supporting community-based organizations that help prevent violence from occurring in the first place, setting focused and strategic enforcement priorities, and measuring the results.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI USA: Hickenlooper, Padilla, Sheehy, Daines Introduce Bipartisan Bill to Create National Wildfire Intelligence Center

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Colorado John Hickenlooper

    Interagency office would improve our wildfire responses, increase collaboration between federal agencies

    WASHINGTON – Today, U.S. Senators John Hickenlooper, Alex Padilla, Tim Sheehy, and Steve Daines introduced their bipartisan Wildfire Intelligence Collaboration and Coordination Act of 2025 to improve how the federal government works together to respond to wildfires and handle wildfire recovery.

    “Wildfires don’t care about state lines or forest service boundaries,” said Hickenlooper. “A centralized wildfire intelligence center will speed our response to fires and promote cross-agency collaboration to tackle them.”

    At the federal level, various departments and agencies have their own fire management goals, firefighters, and jurisdictions that determine how they respond to fires. The current division of responsibilities is unnecessarily burdensome and leaves gaps for cross-department collaboration. A national Wildfire Intelligence Center would compile comprehensive information on wildfires to better inform and streamline wildfire responses and recovery by providing states with a central command within the federal government. The center would also enhance monitoring and imaging capabilities beyond what land management agencies can currently achieve.

    This center would be modeled after similar information sharing centers like the National Weather Service and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) Water Center, which coordinate information sharing to educate people, improve understanding, and foster collaboration among various federal, state, and academic units.

    Specifically, the Wildfire Intelligence Center would:

    • Establish a Wildfire Intelligence Center between the Departments of Agriculture, Commerce, and Department of the Interior to study, plan, coordinate, and implement the federal wildfire response
    • Provide comprehensive assessment and modeling of wildfires to inform responses, land and fuels management, risk reduction, post-wildfire recovery, and rehabilitation
    • Improve emergency planning with enhanced evacuation plans, power shutoff strategies, and fire response tactics
    • Facilitate coordination and information sharing between departments and state, local, and tribal jurisdictions
    • Leverage cutting-edge technologies for wildfire mitigation and response

    “The devastating Southern California fires are the latest example of increasingly intense and frequent fires ravaging communities within both local jurisdictions and on federal land,” said Padilla. “Wildfires don’t distinguish between our boundaries, and we can’t afford to be siloed in our response. The scale of the wildfire crisis demands a singular, whole-of-government wildfire intelligence center to foster cross-agency collaboration and save lives.”

    “We can all agree that the federal government must do a better job protecting our people, property, public lands, and communities from wildfires, and this bill will go a long way in streamlining our wildland firefighting efforts and best leveraging all available resources to accomplish our shared mission. As the only aerial firefighter in the Senate, I’m proud to be working with folks on both sides of the aisle to deliver commonsense solutions to more effectively fight the devastating threat of wildfires and protect the American people,” said Sheehy.

    “As fire season rapidly approaches for Montana, we need all hands on deck to prevent catastrophic disasters. Sharing information and resources between agencies will undoubtedly help Montana communities take preventive measures and better combat fires and coordinate response efforts,” said Daines.

    “The Wildfire Intelligence Center established by this bill will harness cutting-edge technology to give decision-makers real-time insights across jurisdictions and landscapes, enhancing coordination at every stage of a fire. The tools to tackle the megafire crisis already exist — this bill brings us closer to putting them in the hands of firefighters and land managers where they can make a real impact,” said Matt Weiner, CEO of Megafire Action. “Senators Padilla and Sheehy understand the urgent need to modernize our wildfire management system, and we look forward to working with them to get this bill signed into law and turn that vision into reality.”

    “FAS applauds Senators Padilla and Sheehy for introducing this bill, which would take a crucial step forward in protecting our communities from increasingly severe wildfires. The Wildfire Intelligence Center would bring together expertise at all levels of government to give our firefighters and first responders access to cutting-edge tools and the decision support they need to confront this growing crisis,” said James Campbell, Wildfire Policy Specialist at the Federation of American Scientists.

    “APCIA supports the Wildfire Intelligence Collaboration and Coordination Act introduced by Senator Padilla (D-CA) and Senator Sheehy (R-MT). This bill reflects the bipartisan recommendations of the Wildland Fire Mitigation and Management Commission to create a joint interagency center to improve fire assessment and prediction in the wildland and built environment. With the risk of catastrophic wildfires increasing, Congress must take action to pass bills like this one that will lead to better land and fuels management, reduce risk to communities, and improve fire management and response,” said David A. Sampson, APCIA’s President and CEO.

    The Wildfire Intelligence Collaboration and Coordination Act is endorsed by Megafire Action, Federation of American Scientists, Association of FireTech Innovation, Alliance for Wildfire Resilience, Climate and Wildfire Institute, Rural Voices for Conservation Coalition, The Stewardship Project, Tall Timbers, Grassroots Wildland Firefighters, American Forests, Environmental Defense Fund, and American Property Casualty Insurance Association.

    Full text of the bill is available HERE.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Security: Stafford man convicted by federal jury for brutally assaulting a deaf passenger during a flight

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    ALEXANDRIA, Va. – A federal jury convicted a Stafford man today on charges relating to his assault of a fellow passenger on a flight from San Francisco to Dulles International Airport in Virginia.

    According to court records and evidence presented at trial, on Oct. 28, 2024, Everett Chad Nelson, 44, was a passenger on United Airlines flight 2247. Without provocation, Nelson approached a sleeping, deaf passenger over twenty rows ahead of his seat, entered the passenger’s row, and began brutally punching the passenger in the face. Nelson punched the victim repeatedly and rapidly, using both hands, and landing forceful, violent blows on the victim’s cheeks, nose, and forehead.  Nelson caused serious bodily injury to the victim, breaking his nose and leaving the victim with injuries that have required months of medical treatment.

    Another passenger, sitting a few rows ahead, heard the commotion, saw the altercation, ran towards the assault and restrained Nelson. The flight crew relocated Nelson and secured him for the remainder of the flight. Nelson was arrested by the FBI upon the flight’s arrival at Dulles.

    Nelson faces up to 10 years in prison, and sentencing will be set for a later date. Actual sentences for federal crimes are typically less than the maximum penalties. A federal district court judge will determine any sentence after considering the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors.

    Erik S. Siebert, U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, and Sanjay Virmani, Special Agent in Charge of the FBI Washington Field Office’s Counterterrorism Division, made the announcement after U.S. District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema accepted the verdict.

    Assistant U.S. Attorneys Daniel K. Amzallag and Heather D. Call are prosecuting the case.

    A copy of this press release is located on the website of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Virginia. Related court documents and information are located on the website of the District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia or on PACER by searching for Case No. 1:24-cr-251.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: Second defendant in organized refunding fraud ring sentenced to 30 months in prison

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    Defendant learned refunding scam from first defendant, is responsible for more than $6 million in stolen goods

    Seattle – A 29- year-old Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania man was sentenced today to 30 months in prison for wire fraud and money laundering crimes related to his operation of a fraudulent online shopping refund scheme, announced U.S. Attorney Tessa M. Gorman. Leonardo Vidal is the second defendant sentenced in an online refunding scheme that stole millions of dollars from retailers. U.S. District Judge Robert S. Lasnik ordered Vidal to be on three years of supervised release following prison.

    “Those running these refunding schemes induced others to essentially steal and cheat while claiming there would be no consequences,” said U.S. Attorney Gorman. “These prison sentences are appropriate for the damage done to retailers and to our community in promoting these illegal schemes.”

    According to records in the case, Vidal operated his own fraudulent refunding fraud scheme from June 2021 until April 2023 called Ressu Refunds. The scheme amassed 2,800 subscribers and obtained $6 million in fraudulent refunds for followers. Beginning in June 2022, Vidal conspired with 25-year-old Dearborn, Michigan, man Sajed Al-Maarej who operated a different refund site called “Simple Refunds.” As with the Ressu refund site, Simple Refunds operated through the messaging service Telegram.

    Sajed Al-Maarej was sentenced to three years in prison in December 2024.

    The Telegram channels represented to prospective purchasers that they could buy high value goods and keep them, while falsely claiming to the merchant company that a refund was due. Purchasers provided Al-Maarej and Vidal with information about their purchase (order number, name, address, value). For a cut of the refund, Al-Maarej, Vidal and their coconspirators would seek a refund by making false representations to the retailers about the status of the order. For example, Simple Refunds or Ressu Refunds would claim the item had not been delivered; was irretrievably damaged; or would have the purchaser mail a box of garbage or junk back to the company – once the package was scanned at the shipping point the refund was issued before the box arrived back and the fraud was discovered.

    The men recruited “insiders” at UPS and the US Postal Service who would input false scans into the order tracking history to make it appear items had been lost in shipping, stolen from the mail, or returned to the company. The end goal was for the purchaser to keep the product and get their money back. The purchaser then paid Al-Maarej or Vidal 10-15% of the purchase price as a fee, enabling Al-Maarej and Vidal to enrich themselves.

    In December 2022, Vidal acquired Simple Refunds from Al-Maarej. Vidal sold Ressu Refunds and Simple Refunds to a different Telegram user in April 2023.  After selling the refunding scheme, Vidal began another illegal enterprise: purchasing the illegally refunded items and selling them. When confronted by law enforcement Vidal took investigators to the locations where he was storing the stolen goods in four shipping containers before selling them online. In one storage container, they found approximately 245 Dewalt Drills, approximately 92 Coway Airmega Air Purifiers, and approximately 78 M18 Fuel High Torque Wrenches, all commonly refunded items.

    During an 8-month period that Vidal operated Ressu Refunds it facilitated more than 3,000 fraudulent refunds worth at least $5.3 million.

    The total value of the fraudulent refunds through Simple Refunds and Ressu Refunds while Vidal was running them is $6,067,168. Vidal agreed to pay restitution of that amount.

    Speaking at sentencing Vidal said, “I want to thank the FBI, because I was going down a very dark path…. I was not a bad person, but I knew it was wrong.”

    The case is being investigated by the FBI and the United States Postal Inspection Service (USPIS). The case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Lauren Watts Staniar.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI USA: HSI El Paso announces arrests of violent criminal aliens in West Texas during targeted enforcement operation

    Source: US Immigration and Customs Enforcement

    EL PASO, Texas — Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), in partnership with U.S. Border Patrol, FBI, ATF, DEA, and the El Paso Sheriff’s Office, arrested several criminal aliens during targeted enforcement actions in West Texas that began during the week of Jan. 20.

    Following are summaries of four individuals arrested during this targeted enforcement operation:

    • A 56-year-old Cuban male with criminal convictions ranging from sexual assault, assault causing bodily harm, and evading arrest to DWI. He is being detained pending his removal from the United States.
    • A 62-year-old Mexican male who has been arrested seven times for driving while intoxicated is now being detained pending removal from the United States.
    • A 27-year-old Mexican male with a criminal conviction for possession of narcotics is now being detained pending removal from the United States.
    • A 32-year-old Mexican male with a criminal history ranging from illegal re-entry after deportation to human smuggling. He is now in federal custody pending charges for transporting illegal aliens.

    “Homeland Security Investigations remains steadfast in our commitment to safeguarding our communities. Through targeted enforcement operations, we focus on removing threats and ensuring public safety,” said HSI El Paso Special Agent in Charge Jason T. Stevens. “Our collaboration with federal, state, and local law enforcement partners is crucial in dismantling criminal organizations and protecting the well-being of our citizens. Together, we strive to create a safer environment for everyone.”

    This type of work is essential in keeping the community safe from criminals. By focusing on enforcement operations and working hand-in-hand with our law enforcement partners, we prevent criminal activities and protect individuals from harm. Ensuring the security of our neighborhoods is a top priority, and we are dedicated to maintaining a strong, unified front against crime.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA News: Eradicating Anti-Christian Bias

    Source: The White House

    By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered:

         Section 1.  Purpose and Policy.  It is the policy of the United States, and the purpose of this order, to protect the religious freedoms of Americans and end the anti-Christian weaponization of government.  The Founders established a Nation in which people were free to practice their faith without fear of discrimination or retaliation by their government. 

         For that reason, the United States Constitution enshrines the fundamental right to religious liberty in the First Amendment.  Federal laws like the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2000bb et seq.), further prohibit government interference with Americans’ rights to exercise their religion.  Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2000e et seq.), prohibits religious discrimination in employment while Federal hate-crime laws prohibit offenses committed due to religious animus.

         Yet the previous Administration engaged in an egregious pattern of targeting peaceful Christians, while ignoring violent, anti-Christian offenses.  The Biden Department of Justice sought to squelch faith in the public square by bringing Federal criminal charges and obtaining in numerous cases multi-year prison sentences against nearly two dozen peaceful pro-life Christians for praying and demonstrating outside abortion facilities.  Those convicted included a Catholic priest and 75-year-old grandmother, as well as an 87-year-old woman and a father of 11 children who were arrested 18 months after praying and singing hymns outside an abortion facility in Tennessee as a part of a politically motivated prosecution campaign by the Biden Administration.  I rectified this injustice on January 23, 2025, by issuing pardons in these cases. 
     
         At the same time, Catholic churches, charities, and pro-life centers sought justice for violence, theft, and arson perpetrated against them, which the Biden Department of Justice largely ignored.  After more than 100 attacks, the U.S. House of Representatives passed a resolution condemning this violence and calling on the Biden Administration to enforce the law.
     
         Then, in 2023, a Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) memorandum asserted that “radical-traditionalist” Catholics were domestic-terrorism threats and suggested infiltrating Catholic churches as “threat mitigation.”  This later-retracted FBI memorandum cited as support evidence propaganda from highly partisan sources.
       
         The Biden Department of Education sought to repeal religious-liberty protections for faith-based organizations on college campuses.  The Biden Equal Employment Opportunity Commission sought to force Christians to affirm radical transgender ideology against their faith.  And the Biden Department of Health and Human Services sought to drive Christians who do not conform to certain beliefs on sexual orientation and gender identity out of the foster-care system.  The Biden Administration declared March 31, 2024 — Easter Sunday — as “Transgender Day of Visibility.”
       
          In this atmosphere of anti-Christian government, hostility and vandalism against Christian churches and places of worship surged, with the number of such identified acts in 2023 exceeding by more than eight times the number from 2018.  Catholic churches and institutions have been aggressively targeted with hundreds of acts of hostility, violence, and vandalism.
         
         My Administration will not tolerate anti-Christian weaponization of government or unlawful conduct targeting Christians.  The law protects the freedom of Americans and groups of Americans to practice their faith in peace, and my Administration will enforce the law and protect these freedoms.  My Administration will ensure that any unlawful and improper conduct, policies, or practices that target Christians are identified, terminated, and rectified.

         Sec. 2.  Establishing a Task Force to Eradicate Anti-Christian Bias.  (a)  There is hereby established within the Department of Justice the Task Force to Eradicate Anti-Christian Bias (Task Force).
         (b)  The Attorney General shall serve as Chair of the Task Force.
         (c)  In addition to the Chair, the Task Force shall consist of the following other members:
              (i)     the Secretary of State;
              (ii)    the Secretary of the Treasury;
              (iii)   the Secretary of Defense;
              (iv)    the Secretary of Labor;
              (v)     the Secretary of Health and Human Services;
              (vi)    the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development;
              (vii)   the Secretary of Education;
              (viii)  the Secretary of Veterans Affairs;
              (ix)    the Secretary of Homeland Security;
              (x)     the Director of the Office of Management and Budget;
              (xi)    Representative of the United States of America to the United Nations;
              (xii)   the Administrator of the Small Business Administration;
              (xiii)  the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation;
              (xiv)   the Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy;
              (xv)    the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency;
              (xvi)   the Chair of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission; and
              (xvii)  the heads of such other executive departments, agencies, and offices that the Chair may, from time to time, invite to participate.

         Sec. 3.  Task Force Functions.  (a)  The Task Force shall meet as required by the Chair and shall take appropriate action to:
              (i)    review the activities of all executive departments and agencies (agencies), including the Department of State, the Department of Justice, including the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Department of Labor, the Department of Health and Human Services, the Department of Education, the Department of Homeland Security, and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, over the previous Administration and identify any unlawful anti-Christian policies, practices, or conduct by an agency contrary to the purpose and policy of this order;
              (ii)   recommend to the head of the relevant agency steps to revoke or terminate any violative policies, practices, or conduct identified under subsection (3)(a)(i) of this section and remedial actions to fulfill the purpose and policy of this order;
              (iii)  share information and develop strategies to protect the religious liberties of Americans and advance the purpose and policy of this order;
              (iv)   solicit information and ideas from a broad range of individuals and groups, including Americans affected by anti-Christian conduct, faith-based organizations, and State, local, and Tribal governments, in order to ensure that its work is informed by a broad spectrum of ideas and experiences;
              (v)    identify deficiencies in existing laws and enforcement and regulatory practices that have contributed to unlawful anti-Christian governmental or private conduct and recommend to the relevant agency head, or recommend to the President, through the Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy and the Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy, as applicable, appropriate actions that agencies may take to remedy failures to fully enforce the law against acts of anti-Christian hostility, vandalism, and violence; and
              (vi)     recommend to the President, through the Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy and the Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy, any additional Presidential or legislative action necessary to rectify past improper anti-Christian conduct, protect religious liberty, or otherwise fulfill the purpose and policy of this order.
         (b)  In order to advise the President regarding its work and assist the President in formulating future policy, the Task Force shall submit to the President, through the Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy and the Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy:
              (i)    a report within 120 days from the date of this order regarding the Task Force’s initial work;  
              (ii)   a report within 1 year from the date of this order that summarizes the Task Force’s work; and
              (iii)  a final report upon the dissolution of the Task Force.

         Sec. 4.  Administration.  (a)  The heads of agencies shall, to the extent permitted by law, upon the request of the Chair, provide the Task Force with any information required by the Task Force for the purpose of carrying out its functions.
         (b)  The Department of Justice shall provide such funding and administrative and technical support as the Task Force may require, to the extent permitted by law and as authorized by existing appropriations.

         Sec. 5.  Termination.  The Task Force shall terminate 2 years from the date of this order unless extended by the President.

         Sec. 6.  General Provisions.  (a)  Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:
              (i)   the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or
              (ii)  the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.
         (b)  This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.
         (c)  This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    THE WHITE HOUSE,
        February 6, 2025.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: ICE Newark arrest of Chilean national leads to federal charges

    Source: US Immigration and Customs Enforcement

    NEWARK, N.J. – A U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement arrest led to Gustavo Ignacio Salas Ortega, 33, a Chilean alien, being charged Feb. 4 in the U.S. District Court in Newark, New Jersey, with one count of conspiracy to receive stolen property that had crossed state lines and one count of receiving stolen property that had crossed state lines.

    Salas Ortega, believed to be part of a South American theft group in Rochelle Park, New Jersey, was arrested by ICE Oct. 14, 2024. ICE then transferred Salas Ortega to U.S Marshals Service custody and lodged an immigration detainer against him.

    “As alleged, the illegal alien offender threatened the public safety of our community by participating in an organized theft group,” said ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations Newark Field Office Director John Tsoukaris.  “These charges against Salas Ortega demonstrate ICE ERO Newark’s commitment to uphold the integrity of our immigration system while promoting the security of New Jersey’s residents.”

    ICE partnered with FBI Newark’s Joint Organized Crime Task Force, the Millburn Police Department, the Port Authority of New York and the New Jersey Police Department in the investigation leading to the charges.

    “The Joint Organized Crime Task Force has been working tirelessly to apprehend these alleged criminals, following a labyrinth of conspirators that span multiple states,” FBI-Newark acting Special Agent in Charge Terence G. Reilly said. “These alleged criminals are part of South American theft groups who have been targeting stores throughout the United States for months. These alleged thieves have worked equally hard to evade law enforcement as they have to infiltrate the very businesses they have ripped off. This charge marks a positive step forward towards dismantling this group.”

    According to the investigation, the defendant was part of a group which scouted a jewelry store in a New Jersey mall before committing the burglary. The defendant and his co-conspirators then entered the jewelry store through the ceiling and a hole they cut through an adjacent wall. Law enforcement later found the defendant wearing an expensive wristwatch that had been in the jewelry store at the time of the burglary. Further investigation showed that the defendant had possessed the stolen wristwatch in New York on multiple days after the burglary.

    Other law enforcement partners throughout the U.S. supported the investigation. Federal partners include U.S. Customs and Border Protection, FBI Denver, FBI New York, and the FBI legal attaché in Santiago, Chile. New Jersey agencies include the Denver Police Department, the Paramus Police Department, the Fair Lawn Police Department, the Edison Police Department and the Essex County Prosecutor’s Office. New York agencies include the Nassau County Police Department, the Woodbury Town Police Department, the Town of Greenburgh Police Department and the New York Police Department. The Northbrook Police Department in Illinois, and the Vacaville Police Department in California, also assisted.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Security: Deering, Alaska, man indicted for abusive sexual contact on an aircraft from Anchorage to Seattle

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    Repeatedly touched 17-year-old sitting next to him despite her actions to stop him

    Seattle – A 27-year-old Deering, Alaska man was arraigned today following his indictment for abusive sexual contact, announced U.S. Attorney Tessa M. Gorman. Trayton C. Ballot was arrested on January 15, 2025, when the Alaska Airlines flight he was on arrived at Seattle-Tacoma International airport. Ballot pleaded not guilty this morning and trial was scheduled in front of U.S. District Judge John H. Chun on April 7, 2025.

    According to records filed in the case, the 17-year-old victim was flying with her mother and a friend from Anchorage to Seattle. Ballot was seated in the middle seat in a row near the back of the plane. The victim was in the window seat. Ballot appeared to be asleep, but then allegedly moved his hand onto the victim’s inner thigh and began rubbing her thigh. The victim removed Ballot’s hand. Two more times Ballot moved his hand onto the 17-year-old’s inner thigh, and she removed his hand. After the third time, the victim lowered her tray table and wedged a pillow under it to protect her lap. Despite those barriers, Ballot moved his hand under the armrest and attempted to place it over the victim’s thigh. The victim pressed down on the pillow to stop the assault and Ballot took his hand away.

    The victim typed into her phone that the man seated next to her had touched her and showed the message to her mother who was seated in the row behind her. At her mother’s instruction, the victim notified the flight attendants who moved her to a different seat.

    Ballot was arrested when the plane arrived in Seattle. He was held at the Federal Detention Center at SeaTac until the next day when he was released on many conditions including that he notify any airline of these charges before he travels.

    Ballot waived his presence at arraignment and his attorney entered a plea of “Not Guilty.”

    Abusive sexual contact is punishable by up to two years in prison.

    The charges contained in the indictment are only allegations.  A person is presumed innocent unless and until he or she is proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.

    The case is being investigated by the FBI.

    The case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Carolyn Forstein.

    MIL Security OSI