NewzIntel.com

Category: Intelligence Agencies

  • MIL-OSI Security: Statement Regarding Fires at Ballot Boxes

    Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) State Crime News

    The following statement may be attributed to U.S. Attorney Tessa M. Gorman and Greg Austin, acting special agent in charge of the FBI Seattle field office:

    “The U.S. Attorney’s Office and the FBI want to assure our communities that we are working closely and expeditiously together to investigate the two incendiary fires at the ballot boxes in Vancouver, Washington, and the one in Portland, Oregon, and will work to hold whoever is responsible fully accountable.”

    Anyone with information is asked to contact the nearest FBI office, provide information through tips.fbi.gov, or call 1-800-CALL-FBI (800-225-5324).

    MIL Security OSI –

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Minister Rishworth Melbourne press conference

    Source: Ministers for Social Services

    Joint with:

    The Hon Jim Chalmers MP
    Treasurer
    Member for Rankin

    The Hon Amanda Rishworth MP
    Minister for Social Services
    Member for Kingston

    E&OE TRANSCRIPT

    Topics: PLACE announcement; support for disadvantaged communities; support for First Nations communities; flight upgrades; Wednesday’s inflation data.

    AMANDA RISHWORTH, MINISTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES: I’m really pleased to be here at the Carlton Learning Precinct with the Treasurer Jim Chalmers, Professor Kristy Muir from the Paul Ramsey Foundation, and the interim CEO of PLACE, Luke Craven.

    Today, we’re announcing a really exciting announcement. A partnership between philanthropy, Government and the community that how we expand the great place-based work that’s happening right around the country. Place-based work is work that communities lead to drive change in their local community supported by non-Government organisations, Government organisations and philanthropy.

    But we know that many communities do want support. They want to share ideas. They want to be part of something bigger, and that’s what PLACE is all about. A national organisation that is a partnership between philanthropy and government to disseminate those good ideas, to support communities, to work with communities to actually drive local change.

    Now one of the really important parts of this new body is that it will have a community council. Local people driving change within place, making sure it constantly stays centred on community. This is really exciting. We already know that place-based change is delivering outcomes in community, particularly in communities where they’ve identified areas of disadvantage. It is actually driving change.

    But this PLACE, this new organisation, will drive change right around the country. I would like to really thank the philanthropic partners for being part of this. This is a new era of working together, and I’m really excited to be part of it. So I will now introduce our Treasurer, Jim Chalmers.

    JIM CHALMERS, TREASURER: Thanks very much, Amanda.

    Before I touch on some other points about this announcement today, can I just say this. Our hearts break today for the little soul lost at Auburn South Primary School. Our hearts go out to the loved ones of that little boy, to his friends, his teachers and the staff at that school. It is unimaginably sad to think that a little boy went to school and didn’t come home. Our hearts break for the family and for everyone who knew him, and we know that it’s a very sad day in the eastern suburbs of Melbourne today, and indeed, for anyone who hears about this right around the country.

    Today, we’re here with the Minister, with Kristy and with Luke to make a really important announcement. This is all about the Albanese Labor government’s belief in a place-based change that these philanthropic organisations are helping to achieve in Australia. For all of us who want to make this country fairer, more inclusive, change can be overwhelming, and it helps to begin in the communities where we can make the biggest difference.

    What we’re doing here is we’re making sure that we take best practice when it comes to place based change, and that we’re empowering local leaders to make a difference in their own communities. Not instead of the national programs that Amanda runs in her portfolio, and that our Government funds and supports, but in addition to that effort as well.

    We don’t want to see disadvantage concentrate in communities and cascade through generations, and we’re doing something about it. We’re not going alone when it comes to this important work. We’re working very closely with philanthropic organisations and Governments at all levels and local communities to try to see the change that we want so that that disadvantage doesn’t concentrate and cascade through the generations.

    For many of us, this is our reason for being, to make sure that this country is its best version of itself. We recognise that there’s not just some switch that you can flick to eliminate disadvantage in our country, you need to begin where we can make the most difference, and that’s what we’re doing.

    What we hope is by demonstrating our support for and our commitment to place-based change, we want to make this the norm, not novel when it comes to national Governments in Australia.

    We are big, big believers in the work of place-based organisations. We are big supporters financially and in other ways as well. We’re very proud to be here today to make this important announcement. We’re now going to hear a bit more about it from Kristy. 

    PROFESSOR KRISTY MUIR, CEO, PAUL RAMSAY FOUNDATION: Thank you. We all want kids, family and communities to thrive across Australia, and we know at the moment, not all of those kids, families and communities are.

    The one thing we know about social change is that no one organisation, no one group, can do this work alone. We have incredible people groups, organisations doing amazing work to strengthen communities.

    This new not-for-profit, PLACE, is all about creating a community of communities. It’s about providing those people and places doing incredible work in their communities, the kind of resources and supports they need to do that better, no matter where they’re based.

    On behalf of the philanthropic funders, I’m really proud to be supporting the initiative of PLACE. And it’s a testament to the Federal Government that we are partnering between government, philanthropy and communities to create the kind of change we all want to see.

    JOURNALIST: Minister Rishworth, you talked about tackling disadvantage and driving positive change, and the Treasurer says disadvantage should be a multi-generational issue. What priorities are front of mind for First Nations people?

    AMANDA RISHWORTH: When you speak with First Nations communities, what you hear from local leaders is they often know what is needed in their community.

    We often hear from First Nations leaders that the supports and programs they want in place should be informed by them themselves, and what PLACE will support those communities to do is to ensure that they can design those programs, they can attract funding, they can work with Government to deliver.

    PLACE is all about empowering communities in their decision making and in their shared decision making with Government, which is exactly what Indigenous communities have been calling out for. We do work that way in some places through the Empowered Communities Program, but this has taken the opportunity of place-based work right across the country to any community that would like to work this way.

    JOURNALIST: [Inaudible – question about upgrade declarations]

    JIM CHALMERS: As I’ve made it clear in our declarations that we make to the Parliament, there is an upgrade for me from about six years ago and another one from about ten years ago, and there’s some additional family upgrades from around the same time period. Those have been disclosed in the usual way.

    I might just take the opportunity to preview some inflation numbers that we’re getting out later this morning. We’ll see what those numbers say at 11:30.

    It’s really clear already that the Albanese Labor Government is making substantial progress in the fight against inflation. When we came to office, inflation was higher and rising. It had a six in front of it. We’ll get new numbers today, which whether they’re in the low threes or in the high twos, will show that inflation has halved under this government.

    Now we know that people are still doing it tough, but we’re making welcome and encouraging and substantial progress in the fight against inflation and economists expect that to be demonstrated in the numbers that we get later this morning. I look forward to talking with you about it.

    Thanks very much.

    MIL OSI News –

  • MIL-OSI Security: Former prosecutor goes to prison for extorting money

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    McALLEN, Texas – The former elected Starr County Attorney has been sentenced for extortion under color of law, announced U.S. Attorney Alamdar S. Hamdani.

    Victor Canales Jr., 51, pleaded guilty Sept. 5, 2023.

    Chief U.S. District Judge Randy Crane has now ordered Canales to serve 37 months in federal prison to be immediately followed by three years of supervised release. At the hearing, the court heard testimony from an auditor with the Texas Attorney General’s Office describing the cash deposits made into Canales’s personal accounts and his use of funds from the Starr County Attorney’s account. In imposing the sentence, the court determined the amount of the bribes at $44,000. The court also noted comments about the culture of corruption in Starr County, and said today’s sentence would act as a deterrent to that corruption.

    “Prosecutors of all stripes, whether at the federal, state or city level, are defined by an oath, one to serve and protect their communities. It’s an oath that seeks only one thing—justice,” said Hamdani. “Victor Canales Jr. violated that oath and the trust of Starr County’s residents in exchange for tens of thousands of dollars in bribes. As an office of dedicated public servants, including 200 prosecutors, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District has little patience for corrupt officials, especially when a prosecutor trades his authority, his oath, for personal gain.” 

    “Today’s sentencing highlights the FBI’s commitment to combat public corruption at every level. Citizens in the Rio Grande Valley deserve local government officials who can be trusted,” said Special Agent in Charge Aaron Tapp of the FBI’s San Antonio Field Office. “The FBI would like to thank our Operation Ice River partners at the Drug Enforcement Administration, as well as Texas Office of the Attorney General, Homeland Security Investigations, and the Texas Department of Public Safety – Texas Rangers for their continued collaboration in rooting out corruption and keeping our communities safe.”

    Canales was the Starr County Attorney from 2005 to 2022. In that role, he was responsible for prosecuting misdemeanor crimes.

    In September 2021, a woman reached out to Canales for assistance because her son had been charged with three misdemeanor offenses in Starr County. He said he could help her and that for $1500, he could take care of the Starr County tickets.

    The mother gave Canales three money orders totaling $1500. He deposited the proceeds into his own checking account and used it for his own personal needs rather than depositing the monies into the Starr County account.

    Canales then sent a series of letters to Cameron County indicating the three charges against the woman’s son would be dropped.

    Canales was permitted to remain on bond and voluntarily surrender to a U.S. Bureau of Prisons facility to be determined in the near future.

    The FBI worked in partnership with the Texas Attorney General’s Office to conduct the Border Corruption Task Force investigation with the assistance of Organized Crime and Drug Enforcement Task Forces agencies including the Drug Enforcement Administration, Homeland Security Investigations, Texas Department of Public Safety – Criminal Investigations and Texas Rangers.

    Assistant U.S. Attorney Patricia Cook Profit prosecuted the case.

    MIL Security OSI –

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Certification success brings new momentum for Filipino vegetable growers

    Source: Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research

    In the past 2 years, an ACIAR-supported value chain project in the Philippines has seen the country’s first smallholder vegetable farmers certified through the Philippines Good Agricultural Practices (PhilGAP) program.

    Although PhilGAP was first launched in 2006 by the Department of Agriculture, there have been few market or other incentives to drive uptake of certification. The program aims to ensure the safety and quality of agricultural products, environmental protection, and the health, safety and welfare of farm workers. 

    But with 43 vegetable growers now certified in the Eastern Visayas and Northern Mindanao regions, and more in progress, it has breathed new life into the PhilGAP program.

    The ACIAR-supported project driving this new momentum is a collaboration involving Applied Horticultural Research, Visayas State University (VSU), Landcare Foundation of the Philippines and the East West Seed Company Inc.

    The efforts of the VSU team in particular have been recognised, when they were awarded the prestigious Presidential Lingkod Bayan (Public Service) Award in September by the Philippines President Ferdinand Marcos Jr.

    Research assistants test soil samples at the Philippine Root Crop and Research Training Center at the Visayas State University in Leyte, Philippines. Photo Veejay Villafranca/ACIAR

    Students from Visayas State University work on their experimental crops at a farm in Cabintan Livelihood Community Association (CALCOA) in Brgy Cabintan, Ormoc City. Photo Veejay Villafranca/ACIAR

    Students from Visayas State University work on their experimental crops at a farm in Cabintan Livelihood Community Association (CALCOA) in Brgy Cabintan, Ormoc City. Photo Veejay Villafranca/ACIAR

    Leader of the project Professor Gordon Rogers said the project’s primary focus was on demonstrating how smallholder farmers could complete the certification process and how they would benefit from a more consumer-focused approach to production.

    Professor Rogers said the research team developed a stepped process which has been the key to help farmers progress towards certification as they were able. There were 36 farms certified by the end of the project in June 2024, and more than 50 other farms had begun the process. By the end of August 2024, the number of certified farms had grown to 43. 

    ‘We divided the process into 4 steps. The first and second steps involve the sort of things that farmers can do easily and cheaply, and which actually have the greatest benefit in terms of improving the food quality and safety, and farm productivity,’ said Professor Rogers.

    Benefits for farmers undertaking certification have included reduced farm inputs, improved health with safer farming practices, improvements in the quality and safety of their produce and increased prices for certified produce.

    Mr Alvin Morales, one of the farmers who has received PhilGAP training, said, ‘The ACIAR project was really a big help to us and taught us many things. Before, we did not care so much about the proper way or methods of applying farm inputs, fertilisers, and pesticides, and how these impact people’s health and the environment. 

    ‘The PhilGAP program taught us to better understand our crops, the environment, the soil, and their inter-relationship. We were taught the more detailed and scientific-based approach to farming.

    Mr Alvin Morales
    PhilGAP program participant

    ‘It is high time that more farmers adopt good agricultural practices that will not harm the environment and produce healthier and safer food for people.

    Mr Alvin Morales inspecting tomatoes growing in a greenhouse at Cabintan, Leyte as part of the PhilGAP program. Photo: ACIAR

    Rodelina’s Fresh Vegetable stand selling PhilGAP certified vegetables at the Baybay markets, Leyte. Photo: ACIAR

    Rodel Morales inspecting a carrot crop growing in a greenhouse at Cabintan, Leyte as part of the PhilGAP program. Photo: ACIAR

    ACIAR project staff and farmers in BayBay, Leyte showing PhilGAP-certified yard-long beans and chillies. Photo: ACIAR

    Professor Rogers said the cost of certification ranged from about 30,000 to 300,000 pesos (A$800 to $8000). This depended largely on the materials used for construction of a storage shed and toilet required for certification. However, most farmers found the costs were recovered in less than 2 years, and in less than 6 months in some instances.

    The project helped farmers adopt a customer-focused approach and identify higher-value niche markets, including food service providers for the healthcare sector and modern food retailers. 

    ‘We also did consumer studies as part of our research and found that when consumers know GAP-certified produce is guaranteed safe to eat, they’re willing to pay a premium,’ added Professor Rogers.

    Professor Zenaida Gonzaga at VSU, was the Philippine project leader, coordinating much of the field research and training for farmers related to the project, as well as PhilGAP training more broadly.

    She said 221 farmers received PhilGAP training, and more than 350 farm extension workers have been trained to promote GAP practices. These extension officers would be key to continuing the moment the ACIAR-supported project has generated into the future.

    Professor Gonzaga highlighted Baybay City Government in Leyte province as being particularly proactive in supporting the project, providing funding for the purchase of materials needed for chemical sheds. It was also the first local government body to pass an ordinance requiring its agricultural extension officers to promote the program with growers.

    ‘Implementation of PhilGAP requires intervention like this at a policy level. Little by little we have increased the number of farms being certified and the support from local government. 

    ‘We now have support to promote certified produce through Baybayania Agriventures, which is a federation of farmers supported by Baybay’s government.’

    Professor Zenaida Gonzaga and Maricel Adelantar inspect new onion varieties at Visayas State University, which the project team identified as a new crop for the region under the PhilGAP program. Photo: ACIAR

    At a higher level, the Regional Development Council for Eastern Visayas – Region VIII – has now also passed a resolution requiring all 6 provinces within the region to implement the PhilGAP program as part of their research extension services.

    GAP practices are also gaining momentum at ground level, with farmers who have received training keen to share what they have learned with others. This includes pest identification and safe work practices on farm, through to the transport and marketing of produce. 

    ‘We’ve found that the project, and the PhilGAP training, have elevated technical farming practices,’ said Professor Gonzaga. ‘It has also significantly reshaped the values and attitudes of farmers who are stepping up to share their knowledge around working safely and producing better quality, safer produce.’ 

    ACIAR Project: ‘Developing vegetable value chains to meet evolving market expectations in the Philippines’  (HORT/2016/188)

    MIL OSI News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Background Press Call on U.S. Efforts to Address U.S. Investments in Certain National Security Technologies and Products in Countries of  Concern

    US Senate News:

    Source: The White House
    Via Teleconference
    2:38 P.M. EDT
    MODERATOR:  Good afternoon, everyone.  Thanks so much for joining today’s call.  As a reminder, this call will be on background, attributable to senior administration officials, and it is embargoed until 5:00 p.m. Eastern today.
    For your awareness, not for your reporting, on the call today we have [senior administration official], [senior administration official], [senior administration official], and [senior administration official]. 
    We’ll follow up shortly after the call with embargoed materials as well, but I will turn it over to [senior administration officials] who will have a few words at the top, and then we’ll take your questions. 
    Over to you.
    SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL:  Thanks, Eduardo, and thanks to everybody for joining us today.
    Since the earliest days of the administration, President Biden has said we are at an inflection point with respect to advanced technologies.  And as he’s often said, we will see more technological change in the next 10 years than we saw in the last 50.
    And that has motivated historic investments, mobilizing hundreds of billions of dollars in private investment to rebuild American manufacturing and innovation. 
    The flipside of that, of course, of promoting critical technologies is, of course, protecting them.  And recognizing how transformative certain technologies can be, the President directed his national security team to ensure that where we have significant advantages, our world-leading technologies and know-how are not used against us to undermine our national security.  That’s been the guiding principle for the Biden-Harris administration’s export control policies, as well as the Outbound Investment Program that we’re glad to announce is being finalized today. 
    As many of you know, we’ve been working on this approach to address certain outbound investments in sensitive technologies and critical sectors that could undermine American national security for some time.  And, in particular, we’ve been focused on the exploitation of certain intangible benefits that often accompany U.S. outbound investments and that help companies succeed through, for example, enhancing their standing and prominence, providing certain types of assistance, introducing investment and talent networks, opening up market access, and enhancing access to additional financing. 
    The People’s Republic of China has a stated goal, as you know: to develop key sensitive technologies that will directly support the PRC’s military modernization and related activities, including weapons development, and it has exploited U.S. investments to develop domestic, military, and intelligence capabilities. 
    So, today, the Treasury Department will issue a Final Rule to implement President Biden’s Executive Order 14105, from August of 2023, which is entitled “Addressing United States Investments in Certain National Security Technologies and Products in Countries of Concern.” 
    The Final Rule provides the operative regulations and a detailed, explanatory discussion regarding its intent and application.  And as directed in the President’s executive order, the Final Rule does prohibit U.S. persons from engaging in certain transactions involving a defined set of technologies and products that pose a particularly acute national security risk to the United States. 
    The Final Rule also requires U.S. persons to notify the Treasury Department of certain other transactions involving a defined set of technologies and products that may contribute to a threat to the national security of the United States. 
    Covered technologies fall into three categories: semiconductors and microelectronics, quantum information technologies, and artificial intelligence.  This set of technologies, we believe, is core for the next generation of military, cybersecurity, surveillance, and intelligence applications, providing what we believe are force multiplier capabilities. 
    The United States already prohibits and restricts the export to countries of concern of many of the technologies and products covered by the Final Rule.  This program complements the United States’ existing export control and inbound screening tools by preventing U.S. investment from advancing the development of these technologies and products in countries of concern. 
    The Treasury Department, as [senior administration official] will lay out, has used feedback through the notice and comment process to help design a carefully tailored approach.  And we also want to commend Senators Casey and Cornyn, Representatives DeLauro, Fitzpatrick, and Pascrell, as well as Representatives Meeks and McCaul in particular, for their leadership on this issue. 
    The overwhelmingly bipartisan vote on Senators Casey and Cornyn’s Outbound Investment Transparency Act as an amendment to the Senate NDAA demonstrates the shared will of Congress and the administration to meaningfully regulate outbound investments. 
    So, with that, I’ll turn it over to [senior administration official] to provide more detail on the content of the Final Rule. 
    Over to you.
    SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL:  Thanks very much.  As mentioned today, Treasury is issuing, at the direction of the President, a targeted and narrowly scoped regulation that implements a new program to address this threat to U.S. national security.  The Final Rule has clear thresholds and definitions to implement the executive order, and provides detailed, explanatory discussion regarding its intent and application to assist investors and other stakeholders to help them navigate this new program. 
    The Final Rule does two things at its core, as previewed: First, it prohibits U.S. persons from engaging in certain transactions involving semiconductors, quantum, and artificial intelligence.  And second, it requires U.S. persons to notify Treasury of certain other transactions involving semiconductors and artificial intelligence. 
    The rule explains in detail the scope of the program, definitions, processes, requirements, and penalties for non-compliance, among other things.  Importantly, this rule has benefited from the input of a variety of stakeholders, industry experts, and allies and partners. 
    We had two rounds of formal comments on the rulemaking to implement the executive order, first with the August 2023 ANPRM that was issued alongside the ENO and on which we got 60 comments from stakeholders.  Those comments were integral in developing the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that we issued in June of this year and on which we received more than 40 additional comments, which further informed the development of the Final Rule.
    Over two-plus years, Treasury, along with the Departments of State and Commerce, have led extensive engagements with stakeholders across the globe.  These engagements and our deliberate decision to offer two rounds of public comment have helped us receive insightful feedback that has helped inform the Final Rule to ensure to choose our national security objectives while taking into account the need to be focused, targeted, and clear. 
    Now, I’ll briefly discuss a few key aspects of the rule. 
    First, as [senior administration official] suggested, the rule imposes requirements on U.S. persons.  This includes prohibiting U.S. persons from engaging in certain transactions with what the rule identifies as covered foreign persons, and requires the U.S. persons to notify the Treasury Department about other transactions that involve covered foreign persons. 
    Second, the Final Rule focuses on specific categories of investment transactions where the target of the investment has a nexus to the PRC and activities involving sensitive technologies and products. 
    In terms of what transactions are covered, the Final Rule applies to, among other things, a U.S. person’s acquisition of an equity interest or contingent equity interest, certain debt financing, certain greenfield investments, or investments that could result in corporate expansion and joint ventures.  This would include, for example, a U.S. investment firm taking an equity stake in an advanced semiconductor manufacturer in the PRC.  It would also cover a U.S. company’s purchase of land in the PRC to develop a quantum computing research facility. 
    There are exceptions for certain types of transactions that are less likely to contribute to the national security threat we’re worried about. 
    For example, the Final Rule excepts or carves out certain investments by a U.S. person to publicly trade securities and certain investments made by a limited partner in a pooled investment fund, among others.
    In light of our ongoing conversations with allies and partners on the importance of multilateral efforts in this area, the Final Rule also includes an exception for certain transactions involving a person of a country or territory outside the United States where the Secretary of the Treasury has determined that the country or territory is addressing national security concerns posed by outbound investment. 
    And third, in terms of the technologies and products in scope for the program, the Final Rule provides technical details on the subsets of semiconductors, quantum, and artificial intelligence that are relevant to the program. 
    For example, a U.S. person is prohibited from acquiring equity in a PRC entity that manufactures advanced semiconductors or that is developing an AI system designed exclusively or intended for a military end use.  A U.S. person would be required to notify Treasury if they are acquiring equity in a PRC company that manufactures legacy semiconductors. 
    Other examples include direct equity investments by a company or private equity fund into any PRC company that is repurposing an AI model for penetration testing or automated vulnerability detection and exploitation, which would be covered under the rule as either notifiable or prohibited, depending on the design end use and computing power used to train an AI system. 
    In addition to direct investments, indirect investments through a parent of a PRC company that is using AI models to improve targeting, intelligence, reconnaissance, and surveillance, or autonomous weapons systems for military use would be prohibited, as would such indirect investments in a PRC company developing or scaling quantum computers or networks to undermine encryption systems.  These technologies can be used for advanced code breaking, the development of next-generation military applications, or offensive cyber operations. 
    Additionally, in general, the rule is based on a U.S. person’s knowledge of the relevant facts, rendering a transaction to be covered under the rule.  Enforcement and penalties are consistent with the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, or IEEPA, the authority by which the President issued the executive order. 
    The Final Rule takes effect on January 2nd, giving stakeholders time to organize internal infrastructure and processes to ensure compliance with the rule. 
    The lengthy preamble to the rule summarizes the response to the comments received, as well as provides an explanation of the changes since the proposed rule issued over the summer. 
    And let me make two additional and final points before concluding. 
    First, this program is calibrated to help ensure our actions can be supported multilaterally, which is a critical component to maximize its effectiveness and reduce backfill from other investors.  The administration has been engaged in extensive conversations with allies and partners on the issue, and we are encouraged to see some allies and partners, including the European Commission and the United Kingdom, exploring the issue of outbound investment security in their own jurisdictions.
    Second, cross-border investment flows have long contributed to U.S. economic vitality.  This targeted action is focused on national security and scope to address specific risks posed by certain U.S. outbound investment, and it maintains our longstanding commitment to open investment. 
    Thanks.  And back to you, Eduardo, for questions.
    MODERATOR:  Thank you.  We now have time for a few questions.  If you’d like to ask a question, please use the “Raise Your Hand” feature on Zoom, and we’ll come to you. 
    First up, we’ll go to Michael Martina.
    Q    Hi there.  Appreciate you doing this.  So, what you described sounds quite similar to the notice for proposed rulemaking earlier in the year.  I’m wondering if you can detail any specific or key changes that you made to the original notice you said it was used to inform this Final Rule.  So, are any changes from earlier?
    And just an effort at clarification.  You know, given the exemptions for publicly traded securities, is it the White House’s contention that China has not significantly exploited publicly traded security purchases by U.S. investors to enhance their military or intelligence capabilities?  My understanding is that this is perfectly fine — you could trade public securities for Chinese defense companies under this; that’s totally within the rules.  Is that correct?  Thanks. 
    SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL:  So, maybe I’ll take the first question, Eduardo.  And then, [senior administration official], if you want to chime in on the second from a White House perspective.
    So, I think while largely consistent with the NPRM in scope and structure, the Final Rule does contain some changes, including with respect to clarity of the rule and thinking forward to compliance. 
    So, for example, we’ve selected clear technical thresholds for notifiable and prohibited transactions involving AI systems based on the amount of compute power to train an AI system that is open in the NPRM; refine how the rule applies to U.S. persons with investment banking authority and non-U.S. entity, such that it clearly applies only to those who actually exercise authority, for example; and clarifying with respect to compliance and enforcement with the rule. 
    And so, there are a number of areas where we have honed and focused and sharpened the rule since then, and those are some examples.
    SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL:  Thanks for the question, Michael.  So, I will say we do have existing authorities to address the threat you were discussing.  So, for example, Treasury has authorities — the Chinese military industrial complex sanctions regulations that are intended to address U.S. persons from purchasing or selling publicly traded securities and companies that are involved in this sector, and there are others as well. 
    MODERATOR:  Next up, we’ll go to the line of Anita Powell.
    Q    Thank you so much.  As you guys are surely aware, Elon Musk is developing a data center in China to train the algorithm to work on self-driving cars.  That’s a lot simpler than I think it really is.  But anyway, is this the type of investment that might be restricted under this new rule?  Can you just kind of flesh that out for us?
    SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL:  Sure.  Happy to start. 
    Look, I don’t think we’re going to get into hypothetical scenarios, but just reiterate some of the points that I’ve said. 
    What the rule is really targeted on is capital and the intangibles that can flow from such American capital to go into the development of PRC-based — not just based, but PRC-based entities that are developing these advanced technologies.  And so, that’s sort of the scope of the rule. 
    And one thing I will mention is that Treasury will provide some guidance and other documents during this interim period before the rule goes online.  That’s certainly our intent to help flesh this out.  But I think going back to the core tenets of the rule is the best way to answer that.
    MODERATOR:  Next up, we’ll go to the line of (inaudible).
    Q    Yeah, hi.  Thanks for doing this and for taking my question.  Could you talk a little bit more about the engagement with allies and partners in the process of finalizing this rule, specifically which allies specifically you engaged with and whether there are any allies who are going to create similar rules of their own?  Thank you.
    SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL:  [Senior administration official], maybe you could start with engagements with allies that you’ve had, but then maybe, [senior administration official], if we could go to you, you could talk a little bit about the G7 as well.  That might be helpful.
    SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL:   Yeah, sure.  Thanks. 
    So, in terms of — just to sort of put a topper before going to [senior administration official], we’ve had a number of engagements with partners and allies, which have resulted in not only sort of technical exchanges about what we are doing and why we’re doing it, but also various statements.  And [senior administration official] will allude to one of them with regard to the G7, but obviously the European Commission and the United Kingdom have made statements in support of these goals.  And so, it’s an ongoing process and one that will continue.
    SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL:  Yeah, and just to add on to what [senior administration official] said, this is something that, you know, even from the White House level we engage with our closest allies and partners on.  And [senior administration official] referenced, you know, a line in the G7 leaders’ statement from Apulia early this year that refers to, you know, recognizing that appropriate measures designed to address risk from outbound investments are important to complement our existing toolkit. 
    So, it’s a conversation that we’re frequently having with our key partners and allies.
    MODERATOR:  And we have time for one more.  We’ll go to the line of Patrick Tucker.
    Q    Hey.  Thanks.  Patrick Tucker from Defense One.
    So, when you say the rule prohibits people from acquiring equity in a PRC entity that manufactures semiconductors that might be used in autonomous weapons systems or that might be repurposed for AI penetration testing, is that based on an observation that there are U.S. firms that currently have investments in those areas of autonomous weaponry and penetration testing for China?  Or are you making the rule now in anticipation that firms might begin to invest in that sort of thing?  I’m trying to get a sense of the degree to which U.S. firms have exposure and have willingly made investments in these areas of the Chinese military.
    SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL:  So let me start, [senior administration official], and then perhaps, [senior administration official], pass it to you. 
    I think what we are worried about, which I would focus on, is the kinds of scenarios that we have outlined, which is supported by data.  And one statistic that comes to mind — and I won’t get it exactly right, so I’d refer you to the Georgetown Center for — I think it’s Technology — that had a statistic that said something to the effect of: For a five-year period, I think between 2016 and 2020 or 2021, 17 percent of investment in Chinese artificial intelligence companies included U.S. participation, and of that, 91 percent was at the venture capital stage. 
    I think if you think about those sets of facts and scenarios, that’s the kind of situation that when it comes to certain artificial intelligence capable of impacting our national security, from military intelligence, cyber, other related perspectives, that’s what we’re concerned about. 
    SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL:  Yeah, I would just add to that that part of the motivation, as we were looking at some case studies to inform the development of this executive order and the regulation, actually was focused on cybersecurity, where we had a number — we saw a number of VC investments directly into firms working on cybersecurity that ended up on the entity list for working with Chinese military or intelligence services.
    MODERATOR:  Thanks, everyone, for joining.  That’s all the time we have for today.  As a reminder, this call was on background, attributable to senior administration officials, and the contents of the call are embargoed until 5:00 p.m. Eastern. 
    We’ll follow up shortly with embargoed materials as well. but do reach out to us, to the NSC or Treasury, with any questions in the meantime.  Thanks so much.
    3:00 P.M. EDT  

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Telegram of the Holy Father on the death of His Eminence Cardinal Renato Raffaele Martino

    Source: The Holy See

    Telegram of the Holy Father on the death of His Eminence Cardinal Renato Raffaele Martino, 29.10.2024

    The following is the telegram of condolence on the death on Monday 28 October 2024 of His Eminence Cardinal Renato Raffaele Martino, protodeacon of San Francesco di Paola ai Monti, president emeritus of the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace and president emeritus of the Pontifical Council for the Pastoral Care of Migrants and Itinerant Peoples, sent by the Holy Father Francis to the late Cardinal’s brother, Marcello Martino:

    Telegram of the Holy Father
    MR. MARCELLO MARTINO00012 GUIDONIA MONTECELIO
    ON LEARNING OF THE NEWS OF THE DEATH OF YOUR BROTHER, CARDINAL RENATO RAFFAELE MARTINO, I WISH TO EXPRESS MY CONDOLENCES TO YOU, TO ALL HIS FAMILY AND TO THE ARCHDIOCESE OF SALERNO-CAMPAGNA-ACERNO OF WHICH HE WAS A RESPECTED PRESBYTER. AS I REMEMBER THIS ZEALOUS PASTOR WHO SERVED THE GOSPEL AND THE CHURCH, I THINK WITH GRATITUDE OF HIS LONG AND DILIGENT COLLABORATION WITH MY PREDECESSORS AS APOSTOLIC NUNCIO TO A NUMBER OF ASIAN COUNTRIES AND ESPECIALLY TO THE UNITED NATIONS ORGANIZATION, WHERE HE SPARED NO ENERGY TO BEAR WITNESS TO THE POPE’S PATERNAL CONCERN FOR THE FATE OF HUMANITY, AND FINALLY AS PRESIDENT OF THE PONTIFICAL COUNCIL FOR JUSTICE AND PEACE. IN THE VARIOUS ROLES ENTRUSTED TO HIM, HE WORKED WITH GREAT DYNAMISM FOR THE GOOD OF PEOPLES, CONSTANTLY PROMOTING DIALOGUE AND CONCORD. I ASK THE LORD TO WELCOME THIS FAITHFUL SERVANT OF HIS TO THE HEAVENLY JERUSALEM AND FROM MY HEART I IMPART MY BLESSING TO THOSE WHO MOURN HIS DEPARTURE, WITH A GRATEFUL THOUGHT FOR THOSE WHO CARED FOR HIM.
    FRANCIS

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI: Territorial Reaffirms Board of Directors Recommendation that Territorial Shareholders Vote “FOR” Hope Bancorp Merger

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    HONOLULU, Oct. 29, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Territorial Bancorp Inc. (NASDAQ: TBNK) (“Territorial” or the “Company”) today announced that the Company’s Board of Directors has reaffirmed its recommendation that Territorial shareholders vote “FOR” the merger with Hope Bancorp, Inc. (“Hope Bancorp”) (NASDAQ: HOPE) at the November 6, 2024, Special Meeting of Stockholders.

    On October 25, 2024, Territorial received additional information from Blue Hill Advisors (“Blue Hill”) with respect to its preliminary indication of interest to acquire the Company.

    Territorial’s Board of Directors (the “Territorial Board”), with the assistance of its legal and financial advisors, over the course of several meetings, carefully reviewed this information in accordance with its fiduciary duties, its commitment to serving the best interests of all Territorial shareholders and its obligations under Territorial’s merger agreement with Hope Bancorp.

    Specifically, the Territorial Board reviewed information provided by Blue Hill, recently and previously, to ascertain whether Blue Hill has provided sufficient verifiable and objective information to justify a Territorial Board determination that Blue Hill’s preliminary indication of interest is reasonably likely to lead to a Superior Proposal as defined by Territorial’s merger agreement with Hope Bancorp. The Territorial Board has also considered whether it would be a breach of its fiduciary duty not to enter into a confidentiality agreement or otherwise engage with Blue Hill based on the information provided by Blue Hill to date. The Territorial Board concluded that the totality of the information provided by Blue Hill does not provide a sufficient basis for a finding that both: (i) the Blue Hill preliminary indication of interest is reasonably likely to lead to a Superior Proposal under the terms and conditions required by the merger agreement; and (ii) a failure to enter into a confidentiality agreement or otherwise negotiate with Blue Hill would be more likely than not to result in a violation of its fiduciary duties under applicable law. Accordingly, the Territorial Board concluded that Territorial may not engage with Blue Hill under the terms and conditions of the Hope Bancorp merger agreement and that it continues to support the merger with Hope Bancorp.

    In reaching this conclusion, the Territorial Board considered, among other things:

    • the all-stock nature of the strategic merger with Hope Bancorp and the benefits the combination with Hope Bancorp will have for shareholders as compared to a cash-out transaction, including the comparison of Hope Bancorp’s liquid, dividend-paying stock to what would be the Blue Hill-controlled Territorial stock, which would be expected to be a relatively more illiquid investment that would likely not pay a dividend for a prolonged period of time;
    • continued questions regarding the conditional nature of the financing of the transaction by the Blue Hill investors, despite Territorial’s repeated statements with respect to this deficiency for several weeks;
    • Blue Hill’s failure to address in a reasoned manner how the Blue Hill investor group would overcome the likely regulatory approval hurdles. In contrast, Hope Bancorp is well known by bank regulators and its approval process is well underway;
    • Blue Hill’s failure to address the impact of the expected changes in regulatory capital and the Company’s business plan, all of which should be expected to be considered as part of any regulatory approval process – despite Blue Hill’s claims that regulatory approvals will be less complicated than the Hope Bancorp approvals;
    • Blue Hill’s failure to realistically address transaction timing considerations, particularly including timing related to the application and regulatory approval process, in contrast to the expected timing of the Hope Bancorp merger approvals and expected timing of the closing of the Hope Bancorp merger;
    • the overall execution risk associated with the Blue Hill preliminary indication of interest, including the necessary steps and approvals required to conduct a recapitalization, a tender offer and negotiations with multiple Blue Hill investors versus Hope Bancorp’s standard merger transaction where all required applications are currently being processed;
    • Blue Hill’s failure to identify the expected key management team members that would manage the revised Company if acquired by Blue Hill. These individuals will be required to be identified to, and vetted by, the banking regulators before any approvals could be obtained;   
    • Blue Hill’s failure to identify all expected directors of the newly-reconstituted Board that would govern Territorial if acquired by Blue Hill, as these individuals will also be required to be identified to, and vetted by, the banking regulators before any approvals could be obtained;
    • Blue Hill’s failure to specify how it would address any limitations established by or approvals that may be required from the banking regulators to pay any termination fee or conduct a tender offer, which would be an outflow of capital that would require regulatory approval; and
    • Blue Hill’s failure to substantiate its projected financial results for Territorial on a stand-alone basis, which Blue Hill has asserted as part of the rationale for its proposed acquisition and which represent a risk for existing shareholders who continue as shareholders if the Blue Hill proposal is completed.

    The Territorial Board continues to recommend that shareholders vote “FOR” the Hope Bancorp merger. For more information, visit the Company’s website at https://www.territorialandhopecombination.com.

    Territorial Shareholders are Urged to Vote “FOR” the Hope Bancorp Merger Ahead of the
    Special Meeting on November 6, 2024 at 8:30 a.m. HST.

    Voting is quick and easy.

    Call toll-free:
    (888) 742-1305
    Banks and brokers should call:
    (516) 933-3100
    Email: info@laurelhill.com
    Electronically: www.proxyvote.com
     

    About Us

    Territorial Bancorp Inc., headquartered in Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, is the stock holding company for Territorial Savings Bank. Territorial Savings Bank is a state-chartered savings bank which was originally chartered in 1921 by the Territory of Hawaiʻi. Territorial Savings Bank conducts business from its headquarters in Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, and has 28 branch offices in the state of Hawaiʻi. For additional information, please visit https://www.tsbhawaii.bank/.

    Additional Information about the Hope Merger and Where to Find It

    In connection with the proposed Hope Merger, Hope has filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) a Registration Statement on Form S-4, containing the Proxy Prospectus, which has been mailed or otherwise delivered to Territorial’s stockholders on or about August 29, 2024, as supplemented September 12, 2024. Hope and Territorial may file additional relevant materials with the SEC. INVESTORS AND STOCKHOLDERS ARE URGED TO READ THE PROXY PROSPECTUS, AND ANY OTHER RELEVANT DOCUMENTS THAT ARE FILED OR FURNISHED OR WILL BE FILED OR FURNISHED WITH THE SEC, AS WELL AS ANY AMENDMENTS OR SUPPLEMENTS TO THOSE DOCUMENTS, CAREFULLY AND IN THEIR ENTIRETY BECAUSE THEY CONTAIN OR WILL CONTAIN IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT THE PROPOSED TRANSACTION AND RELATED MATTERS. You may obtain any of the documents filed with or furnished to the SEC by Hope or Territorial at no cost from the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

    Forward-Looking Statements

    Some statements in this news release may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements preceded by, followed by or that include the words “will,” “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “estimates” or similar expressions. With respect to any such forward-looking statements, Territorial Bancorp claims the protection provided for in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements involve risks and uncertainties. Hope Bancorp’s actual results, performance or achievements may differ significantly from the results, performance or achievements expressed or implied in any forward-looking statements. The closing of the proposed transaction is subject to regulatory approvals, the approval of Territorial Bancorp stockholders, and other customary closing conditions. There is no assurance that such conditions will be met or that the proposed merger will be consummated within the expected time frame, or at all. If the transaction is consummated, factors that may cause actual outcomes to differ from what is expressed or forecasted in these forward-looking statements include, among things: difficulties and delays in integrating Hope Bancorp and Territorial Bancorp and achieving anticipated synergies, cost savings and other benefits from the transaction; higher than anticipated transaction costs; deposit attrition, operating costs, customer loss and business disruption following the merger, including difficulties in maintaining relationships with employees and customers, may be greater than expected; and required governmental approvals of the merger may not be obtained on its proposed terms and schedule, or without regulatory constraints that may limit growth. Other risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to: possible further deterioration in economic conditions in Hope Bancorp’s or Territorial Bancorp’s areas of operation or elsewhere; interest rate risk associated with volatile interest rates and related asset-liability matching risk; liquidity risks; risk of significant non-earning assets, and net credit losses that could occur, particularly in times of weak economic conditions or times of rising interest rates; the failure of or changes to assumptions and estimates underlying Hope Bancorp’s or Territorial Bancorp’s allowances for credit losses; potential increases in deposit insurance assessments and regulatory risks associated with current and future regulations; the outcome of any legal proceedings that may be instituted against Hope Bancorp or Territorial Bancorp; the risk that any announcements relating to the proposed transaction could have adverse effects on the market price of the common stock of either or both parties to the proposed transaction; and diversion of management’s attention from ongoing business operations and opportunities. For additional information concerning these and other risk factors, see Hope Bancorp’s and Territorial Bancorp’s most recent Annual Reports on Form 10-K. Hope Bancorp and Territorial Bancorp do not undertake, and specifically disclaim any obligation, to update any forward-looking statements to reflect the occurrence of events or circumstances after the date of such statements except as required by law.

    Investor / Media Contacts:
    Walter Ida
    SVP, Director of Investor Relations
    808-946-1400
    walter.ida@territorialsavings.net

    The MIL Network –

  • MIL-OSI Security: U.S. Joins International Action Against RedLine and META Infostealers

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    RedLine and META Infostealers stole information from millions of victims around the world; U.S. complaint charges developer and administrator; U.S. law enforcement seizes infrastructure

    AUSTIN, Texas – The Department of Justice joined the Netherlands, Belgium, Eurojust and other partners in announcing an international disruption effort against the current version of RedLine Infostealer, one of the most prevalent infostealers in the world that has targeted millions of victim computers, and the closely-related META Infostealer.

    The Justice Department, FBI, Naval Criminal Investigative Service, IRS Criminal Investigation, Defense Criminal Investigative Service, and Army Criminal Investigation Division joined international partners in the Joint Cybercrime Action Taskforce (“JCAT”) Operation Magnus (supported by Europol) to seize domains, servers, and Telegram accounts used by the RedLine and META administrators to disrupt the operations of the infostealers.

    International authorities have created a website at www.operation-magnus.com with additional resources for the public and potential victims.

    Infostealers are a prevalent form of malware used to steal sensitive information from victim’s computers including usernames and passwords, financial information, system information, cookies, and cryptocurrency accounts. The stolen information—referred to as “logs”—is sold on cybercrime forums and used for further fraudulent activity and other hacks. RedLine has been used to conduct intrusions against major corporations. RedLine and META infostealers can also enable cyber criminals to bypass multi-factor authentication (MFA) through the theft of authentication cookies and other system information.

    RedLine and META are sold through a decentralized Malware as a Service (“MaaS”) model where affiliates purchase a license to use the malware, and then launch their own campaigns to infect their intended victims. The malware is distributed to victims using malvertising, e-mail phishing, fraudulent software downloads, and malicious software sideloading. Various schemes, including COVID-19 and Windows update related ruses have been used to trick victims into downloading the malware. The malware is advertised for sale on cybercrime forums and through Telegram channels that offer customer support and software updates. RedLine and META have infected millions of computers worldwide and, by some estimates, RedLine is one of the top malware variants in the world.

    Through various investigative steps, law enforcement has collected victim log data stolen from computers infected with RedLine and META. While an exact number has not been finalized, agents have identified millions of unique credentials (usernames and passwords), email addresses, bank accounts, cryptocurrency addresses, credit card numbers, etc. The United States does not believe it is in possession of all the stolen data and continues to investigate.

    The Department has unsealed a warrant issued in the Western District of Texas that authorized law enforcement to seize two domains used by RedLine and META for command and control.

    In conjunction with the disruption effort, the Justice Department unsealed charges against Maxim Rudometov, one of the developers and administrators of RedLine Infostealer. According to the complaint, Rudometov regularly accessed and managed the infrastructure of RedLine Infostealer, was associated with various cryptocurrency accounts used to receive and launder payments and was in possession of RedLine malware. For his actions, he has been charged with access device fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1029, conspiracy to commit computer intrusion, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1030 and 371, and money laundering, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956.

    If convicted, Rudometov faces a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison for access device fraud, five years in prison for conspiracy to commit computer intrusion, and 20 years in prison for money laundering. The complaint is merely an allegation, and the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.

    The FBI Austin Cyber Task Force is investigating the case. The Task Force participants include the Naval Criminal Investigative Service, IRS Criminal Investigation, Defense Criminal Investigative Service, and Army Criminal Investigation Division, among other agencies.

    Assistant U.S. Attorney G. Karthik Srinivasan is prosecuting the case. The Justice Department’s Cybercrime Liaison Prosecutor to Eurojust and Office of International Affairs also provided significant assistance.

    The disruption effort announced today was in conjunction with Operation Magnus, a JCAT law enforcement operation to investigate RedLine and META Infostealers. The participating agencies included the Dutch National Police, Belgian Federal Police, Belgian Federal Prosecutor’s Office, United Kingdom National Crime Agency, Australian Federal Police, Portuguese Federal Police, and Eurojust.

    ###

    MIL Security OSI –

  • MIL-OSI Security: Darnell Bishop Sentenced To 15 Years For Role In Benton Harbor Dunham’s Store Handgun Theft

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

              GRAND RAPIDS, MICHIGAN — U.S. Attorney for the Western District of Michigan Mark Totten today announced that Darnell Bishop, 32, of Benton Harbor, was sentenced to 15 years in federal prison for kidnapping and brandishing a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence. 

              “Mr. Bishop’s criminal scheme, had it succeeded, would have flooded the streets of southwest Michigan with illegal guns,” said U.S. Attorney Mark Totten. “The proliferation of illegal guns is one cause behind the gun violence epidemic we are experiencing in Benton Harbor, across the state, and across the nation. I am grateful to our local, state, and federal law enforcement partners for their swift and smart response that prevented the worst from happening. Moving forward, we will continue to focus our efforts on those few individuals who are driving gun violence in their communities.”

              Bishop was charged along with his brother and codefendant, Dontrell Nance, for the theft of 123 handguns from Benton Harbor Dunham’s Sports Store. Bishop and Nance kidnapped the Dunham’s manager from outside the manager’s home using a pistol, blindfolded and handcuffed him, took him to a second location, and threatened the manager into providing the alarm code for Dunham’s. Bishop then went to the store and stole 123 pistols, which he carried away in two large coolers. Law enforcement has since recovered all the firearms.  

              Nance previously pled guilty to kidnapping and brandishing a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence.  He was sentenced to 15 years in federal prison.

              “Today’s sentence is an example of our commitment to our industry partners and their employees, that their safety and security is one of ATF’s top priorities,” said Detroit Field Division Special Agent in Charge James Deir. “Mr. Bishop and his cohorts need to be held accountable for their actions and represent the most deserving of Federal prosecution. They are criminals who put personal greed before the safety of Dunham’s employees and their families. Now, they will have plenty of time in prison to reflect on their wrongdoing.”

              “Mr. Bishop’s sentencing brings closure to a community left rattled by a violent attack against Dunham’s Sports and its manager in a plot to traffic over 100 illegal guns into our streets,” said Cheyvoryea Gibson, Special Agent in Charge of the FBI in Michigan. “I am thankful for the cooperation of our law enforcement partners, especially the Benton Harbor Safe Streets Task Force, whose prompt response thwarted this plot and averted potentially devastating consequences.”

              This case was investigated by the Benton Charter Township Police Department, Benton Harbor Department of Public Safety, Berrien County Sheriff’s Department, Michigan State Police, ATF, and FBI.

    ###

              The previous press releases, complaint, and press conference can be viewed at the following links here, here, here, here, and here. 

    MIL Security OSI –

  • MIL-OSI: You Could Get Up to $1,300 the Same Day with an H&R Block Emerald Advance® Loan

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    KANSAS CITY, Mo., Oct. 29, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — H&R Block (NYSE: HRB) today announced the opening of the 2024 application period for the H&R Block Emerald Advance® Loan1. Applications will be accepted November 1 through December 31, 2024. The Emerald Advance® Loan originated by Pathward® N.A. provides qualifying individuals up to $1,300 the same day they apply. The Emerald Advance® Loan could provide a little extra breathing room to help with holiday shopping, bills, or unexpected expenses.

    “During the holiday season, tight budgets can create additional stress on individuals and families already facing tighter budgets. The Emerald Advance Loan is designed to be simple to apply for and flexible to pay back, for those who need a little extra financial breathing room this time of year,” said John Thompson, Vice President of Financial Services at H&R Block. “By streamlining the application process and eliminating annual fees, the aim is to make it as simple as possible for families to get the assistance they need.”

    The Emerald Advance Loan has no application fee, and checking eligibility won’t impact a customer’s credit. With no monthly payments required, approved customers now have more flexibility to pay what they can, when they can as long as they pay the loan in full by March 31, 2025. There are convenient repayment options, including using a debit card, check, or money order. And for those who file their taxes with H&R Block this upcoming tax season, the loan can conveniently be paid back with their tax refund.

    Anyone can apply for the H&R Block Emerald Advance® Loan during the application period which runs from November 1 through December 31, 2024. To check eligibility and apply, go to HRBlock.com to make an appointment at one of nearly 4,000 participating H&R Block offices. H&R Block associates will gladly assist with the application process. Approved applicants could leave with funds on an Emerald Card®2 or deposited to their Spruce account2.

    To learn more, and make an appointment to apply for Emerald Advance today, visit HRBlock.com

    1H&R Block Emerald Advance® Loan originated by Pathward®, N.A. Subject to eligibility and credit approval. Annual Percentage Rate (APR) is 35.9%. Loan amounts vary from $350-$1300. If approved, loan proceeds will be disbursed as directed to prepaid card or checking account at Pathward. Additional terms and conditions apply, see account agreements for details. Offered for a limited time at participating locations.

    2 Spruce fintech platform is built by H&R Block, which is not a bank. Spruce℠ Spending and Savings Accounts established at, and the Spruce debit card and the H&R Block Emerald Prepaid Mastercard® are issued by, Pathward®, N.A., Member FDIC, pursuant to license by Mastercard®. Mastercard and the circles design are registered trademarks of Mastercard International Incorporated. Additional fees, conditions, and terms apply to how you use your Emerald Card or Spruce account. Consult your Cardholder Agreement or Spruce Spending Account Agreement for details.

    About H&R Block 
    H&R Block, Inc. (NYSE: HRB) provides help and inspires confidence in its clients and communities everywhere through global tax preparation services, financial products, and small-business solutions. The company blends digital innovation with human expertise and care as it helps people get the best outcome at tax time and also be better with money using its mobile banking app, Spruce. Through Block Advisors and Wave, the company helps small-business owners thrive with year-round bookkeeping, payroll, advisory, and payment processing solutions. For more information, visit H&R Block News.

    The MIL Network –

  • MIL-OSI: NANO Nuclear Energy Scheduled to Present at the ThinkEquity Conference on October 30, 2024

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    New York, N.Y., Oct. 29, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — NANO Nuclear Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: NNE) (“NANO Nuclear” or “the Company”), a leading advanced nuclear energy and technology company focused on developing portable, clean energy solutions, today announced that its senior leadership will lead a presentation at the upcoming ThinkEquity Conference, held on October 30th, 2024, at the Mandarin Oriental Hotel in New York City.

    “The ThinkEquity Conference is well-known and anticipated gathering of innovative companies,” said Jay Yu, Founder and Chairman of NANO Nuclear Energy. “We’re excited to lead an informative and engaging presentation and look forward to meaningful one-on-one discussions with fellow attendees.”

    Figure 1 – NANO Nuclear Energy Inc. Will Present at The ThinkEquity Conference, to be held on October 30th, 2024, at the Mandarin Oriental Hotel in New York City.

    The 2024 edition of the ThinkEquity Conference will showcase innovative companies across sectors such as alternative energy, biotechnology, AI & big data, and more. With over 750 attendees, the event will feature more than 75 company presentations and 650 one-on-one meetings with investors.

    “It is a pleasure to be participating the ThinkEquity Conference this year,” said James Walker, Chief Executive Officer and Head of Reactor Development of NANO Nuclear Energy. “In addition to discussing the progress of our innovative technologies during the presentation, the event offers a valuable opportunity to engage personally with investors and innovators from other sectors.”

    About NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc.

    NANO Nuclear Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: NNE) is an advanced technology-driven nuclear energy company seeking to become a commercially focused, diversified, and vertically integrated company across four business lines: (i) cutting edge portable microreactor technology, (ii) nuclear fuel fabrication, (iii) nuclear fuel transportation and (iv) nuclear industry consulting services. NANO Nuclear believes it is the first portable nuclear microreactor company to be listed publicly in the U.S.

    Led by a world-class nuclear engineering team, NANO Nuclear’s products in technical development are “ZEUS”, a solid core battery reactor, and “ODIN”, a low-pressure coolant reactor, each representing advanced developments in clean energy solutions that are portable, on-demand capable, advanced nuclear microreactors.

    Advanced Fuel Transportation Inc. (AFT), a NANO Nuclear subsidiary, is led by former executives from the largest transportation company in the world aiming to build a North American transportation company that will provide commercial quantities of HALEU fuel to small modular reactors, microreactor companies, national laboratories, military, and DOE programs. Through NANO Nuclear, AFT is the exclusive licensee of a patented high-capacity HALEU fuel transportation basket developed by three major U.S. national nuclear laboratories and funded by the Department of Energy. Assuming development and commercialization, AFT is expected to form part of the only vertically integrated nuclear fuel business of its kind in North America.

    HALEU Energy Fuel Inc. (HEF), a NANO Nuclear subsidiary, is focusing on the future development of a domestic source for a High-Assay, Low-Enriched Uranium (HALEU) fuel fabrication pipeline for NANO Nuclear’s own microreactors as well as the broader advanced nuclear reactor industry.

    NANO Nuclear Space Inc. (NNS), a NANO Nuclear subsidiary, is exploring the potential commercial applications of NANO Nuclear’s developing micronuclear reactor technology in space. NNS is focusing on applications such as power systems for extraterrestrial projects and human sustaining environments, and potentially propulsion technology for long haul space missions. NNS’ initial focus will be on cis-lunar applications, referring to uses in the space region extending from Earth to the area surrounding the Moon’s surface.

    For more corporate information please visit: https://NanoNuclearEnergy.com/

    For further information, please contact:
    Email: IR@NANONuclearEnergy.com
    Business Tel: (212) 634-9206

    PLEASE FOLLOW OUR SOCIAL MEDIA PAGES HERE:
    NANO Nuclear Energy LINKEDIN
    NANO Nuclear Energy YOUTUBE
    NANO Nuclear Energy TWITTER

    Cautionary Note Regarding Forward Looking Statements

    This news release, the conference presentation described herein, and statements of NANO Nuclear’s management in connection with this news release and such presentation contain or may contain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In this context, forward-looking statements mean statements related to future events, which may impact our expected future business and financial performance, and often contain words such as “expects”, “anticipates”, “intends”, “plans”, “believes”, “potential”, “will”, “should”, “could”, “would” or “may” and other words of similar meaning. These forward-looking statements are based on information available to us as of the date of this news release and represent management’s current views and assumptions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, events or results and involve significant known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may be beyond our control. For NANO Nuclear, particular risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual future results to differ materially from those expressed in our forward-looking statements include but are not limited to the following: (i) risks related to our U.S. Department of Energy (“DOE”) or related state nuclear fuel licensing submissions, (ii) risks related the development of new or advanced technology, including difficulties with design and testing, cost overruns, development of competitive technology, (iii) our ability to obtain contracts and funding to be able to continue operations, (iv) risks related to uncertainty regarding our ability to technologically develop and commercially deploy a competitive advanced nuclear reactor or other technology in the timelines we anticipate, if ever, (v) risks related to the impact of government regulation and policies including by the DOE and the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, including those associated with the recently enacted ADVANCE Act, and (vi) similar risks and uncertainties associated with the business of a start-up business operating a highly regulated industry. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which apply only as of the date of this news release. These factors may not constitute all factors that could cause actual results to differ from those discussed in any forward-looking statement, and the NANO Nuclear therefore encourages investors to review other factors that may affect future results in its filings with the SEC, which are available for review at www.sec.gov and at https://ir.nanonuclearenergy.com/financial-information/sec-filings. Accordingly, forward-looking statements should not be relied upon as a predictor of actual results. We do not undertake to update our forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that may arise after the date of this news release, except as required by law.

    Attachment

    The MIL Network –

  • MIL-OSI Global: RFK Jr.’s pivot to Trump is a journey taken by many populists swept along the left-to-right alternative media pipeline

    Source: The Conversation – USA – By Rachel Meade, Lecturer of Political Science, Boston University

    When Robert F. Kennedy Jr. ended his independent presidential run in August 2024 and endorsed Republican Donald Trump, it might have seemed a surprising turn of events.

    Kennedy began his presidential run as a Democrat and is the scion of a Democratic dynasty. Nephew to former President John F. Kennedy and the son of former Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy, Kennedy spent most of his career as a lawyer representing environmental groups that sued polluting corporations and municipalities.

    Yet Kennedy, 70, has long held positions that put him at odds with the Democratic mainstream. He pushes public health misinformation around vaccines and HIV/AIDS, opposes U.S. military involvement in foreign wars, including in Ukraine, and claims that the CIA assassinated his uncle.

    Kennedy’s ideologically mixed politics are hard to categorize in traditional left-right terms.

    My political science research finds that Kennedy’s journey from left-aligned skepticism into Trumpism is part of a broader trend of contemporary left-to-right populist transformations happening across the United States.

    Rise of the populist alternative media

    Populism is a political story that presents the good “people” of a nation as in a struggle against its “elites,” who have corrupted democratic institutions to further their own selfish interests. It cuts across the ideological spectrum, often combining left-wing economic critiques with right-wing cultural ones.

    Based on my research, I find that Kennedy uses a populist style of speech that matches the rhetoric of today’s online alternative media, also known as the “alternative influence network.”

    If populism cuts across the ideological spectrum, so does the alternative media.

    This network of politically diverse independent podcasters, YouTube hosts and other creators connects with young, politically disaffected audiences by mixing politics with comedy and pop culture, and presenting themselves as embattled defenders of free thinking – in opposition to mainstream media and mainstream parties.

    Top-rated shows include “Breaking Points,” “Stay Free with Russell Brand,” “The Joe Rogan Experience,” The Culture War with Tim Pool and “This Past Weekend w/ Theo Von.”

    While many of these shows have been around since the 2010s, the network expanded throughout the Trump era. Their popularity skyrocketed during the COVID-19 pandemic, when public distrust in government, anger over pandemic restrictions and vaccine skepticism surged.

    These shows hosted Kennedy frequently throughout his presidential run in 2023 and 2024.

    Kennedy finds his audience

    I analyzed a set of Kennedy’s appearances for this story. Both Kennedy and alternative media hosts claim to care about “the real issues” facing Americans such as war, corporate and political malfeasance and economic troubles. They condemn the “mainstream” for promoting frivolous “culture war” topics related to race and identity politics.

    Kennedy and the alternative media hosts also combine left and right arguments in a typically populist way. They claim that corporations control the government and that liberals and corporations censor free speech.

    For example, on a May 2024, episode of “Stay Free with Russell Brand,” Brand asserted that corrupt institutions are backed by the “deep state.” He asked Kennedy how he would fight these powerful interests.

    “The major agencies of government have all been captured by the industries they’re supposed to regulate and act as sock puppets serving the mercantile interests of these big corporations,” responded Kennedy. “I have a particular ability to unravel that because I’ve litigated against so many of these agencies.”

    My research found that Kennedy often bonded with his alternative media hosts over his perception that liberal media sources – allegedly controlled by the Democratic National Committee or the CIA – were censoring his campaign.

    Like Kennedy, alternative media hosts often identify as former or disaffected Democrats. Many used to work at mainstream left news sites, where they say they experienced censorship.

    ‘This little island of free speech’

    In a June 2023 episode of “The Joe Rogan Experience,” Rogan explained that he no longer identifies as a liberal because of the “orthodoxy it preaches” around issues like vaccines. He then cited YouTube’s removal of some of Kennedy’s vaccine-related videos for violating its COVID-19 misinformation policy.

    Kennedy had just spent 90 minutes outlining his journey toward vaccine skepticism, which started with meeting a mother who believed vaccines caused her son’s autism.

    “If a woman tells you something about her child, you should listen,” he said.

    Kennedy also described being convinced by a set of studies that public health officials had ignored.

    “Trust the experts is not a function of science, it’s a function of religion,” he said. “I’ve been litigating 40 years; there’s experts on both sides.”

    Afterward, he thanked Rogan for maintaining “this little island of free speech in a desert of suppression and of critical thinking.”

    Kennedy reiterated this point in the Aug. 23, 2024, speech that ended his campaign, saying the “alternative media” had kept his ideas alive, while the mainstream networks had shut him out despite his historically high third-party poll numbers of 15% to 20%.

    “The DNC-allied mainstream media networks maintained a near-perfect embargo on interviews with me,” Kennedy said.

    Speaking directly to the reporters in the room, he added, “Your institutions and media made themselves government mouthpieces and stenographers for the organs of power.”

    Left-to-right pipeline

    Trust in a range of U.S. institutions is at historical lows. Americans on both the right and the left are skeptical of power and crave radical change.

    Alternative media hosts tap into this desire, helping to push some disaffected listeners down the same left-to-right pipeline that landed Kennedy in Trump’s orbit.

    Trump and his allies are adept at harnessing the power of the alternative media ecosystem. Trump has appeared on male-centric shows like “This Past Weekend w/ Theo Von and ”The Joe Rogan Experience,“ and he founded the alternative social media platform Truth Social.

    Trump’s former adviser Steve Bannon hosts an influential podcast called the “War Room” on another MAGA alternative media platform, Rumble. Known for its fiery populist rhetoric, the “War Room” broadcasts live for an astonishing 22 hours a week.

    Until recently, Democrats have largely embraced traditional media. During the first months of her 2024 presidential campaign, Vice President Kamala Harris appeared on CBS’ “60 Minutes,” ABC’s “The View” and MSNBC’s “Stephanie Ruhle.”

    Then, on Oct. 12, Harris appeared on “Call her Daddy.” Spotify’s second-most popular podcast, it has a young, female audience. Days later, she sat down for an interview with Fox News and is reportedly in talks to appear on Joe Rogan’s show.

    Kennedy might approve of all this aisle-crossing.

    “Step outside the culture war!” he tweeted in July 2024. “Step outside the politics of hating the other side!”

    Rachel Meade does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    – ref. RFK Jr.’s pivot to Trump is a journey taken by many populists swept along the left-to-right alternative media pipeline – https://theconversation.com/rfk-jr-s-pivot-to-trump-is-a-journey-taken-by-many-populists-swept-along-the-left-to-right-alternative-media-pipeline-236828

    MIL OSI – Global Reports –

  • MIL-OSI: Savi Financial Corporation Earns $205,000 in the Third Quarter of 2024; Results Highlighted by NIM Expansion

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    MOUNT VERNON, Wash., Oct. 29, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Savi Financial Corporation, Inc. (OTC Pink: SVVB), the bank holding company for SaviBank, today reported net income of $205,000, or $0.05 per diluted share, for the third quarter of 2024. This compared to a net loss of $5,000, or a loss of $0.00 per diluted share, in the second quarter of 2024, and net income of $558,000, or $0.13 per diluted share, in the third quarter of 2023. In the first nine months of 2024, the Company reported a net loss of $216,000, or a loss of $0.05 per diluted share, compared to net income of $1.59 million, or $0.36 per diluted share, in the first nine months of 2023. All results are unaudited.

    “We reported improved third quarter 2024 operating results, compared to the preceding quarter, driven by increases in net interest income, lower non-interest expense and net interest margin expansion,” said Michal D. Cann, Chairman and President of Savi Financial Corporation. “Overall, loan growth was muted during the quarter, in part due to a slowdown in the local economy and uncertainties surrounding the election and future economic growth. However, we are seeing improvements in our loan pipeline, particularly with SBA loan originations. Further, we experienced good growth in core deposits during the quarter, with an increase in core deposits from local municipalities, which will allow us to reduce our reliance on brokered deposits to fund future growth.”

    “Loan growth was relatively flat compared to the preceding quarter and up 5% compared to a year ago. However, we did see good growth in the loan pipelines,” said Andrew Hunter, President and CEO of SaviBank. “We continue to seek out lending opportunities from our customers and anticipate slower than historic loan growth for the remainder of the year.”

    “The increase in loan yields during the quarter contributed to net interest margin (NIM) expansion of four basis points during the current quarter,” said Rob Woods, Chief Financial Officer of SaviBank. “We anticipate funding costs are near their peak and will continue to stabilize and should improve over the next few quarters if interest rates continue to decrease.” The Company’s NIM was 3.52% in the third quarter of 2024, compared to 3.48% in the preceding quarter, and 3.66% in the third quarter a year ago. The NIM remains higher than the peer average of 3.21% posted by the 171 banks that comprised the Dow Jones U.S. Microcap Bank Index as of June 30, 2024. The cost of funds increased to 244 basis points during the third quarter of 2024, compared to 238 basis points in the preceding quarter.

    Merger

    On March 22, 2024, the Company announced that it had signed a Purchase and Assumption agreement whereby Lakewood, WA. based Harborstone Credit Union will acquire SaviBank in an all-cash transaction. The transaction is structured as a purchase agreement with Harborstone Credit Union purchasing substantially all assets and assuming substantially all liabilities of SaviBank. The transaction is anticipated to be completed in the spring of 2025, subject to receiving all regulatory approvals. Shareholders of Savi Financial have approved the acquisition.

    “We look forward to working with Harborstone Credit Union to continue our tradition of having a positive impact in our local communities,” said Cann. “We are deeply focused on providing resources and services for our customers to succeed, and believe that the additional services, products and locations Harborstone Credit Union provides will help us continue to meet the financial needs of our customers. Through the unique structure of this acquisition by Harborstone Credit Union, we believe we are maximizing value to our shareholders who have supported us over the years.”

    Third Quarter 2024 Highlights:

    • The Company reported net income of $205,000 for the third quarter of 2024, compared to net loss of $5,000 for the second quarter of 2024, and net income of $558,000 for the third quarter of 2023.
    • Earnings per diluted share were $0.05 in the third quarter of 2024, compared to losses per diluted share of $0.00 in the preceding quarter, and earnings per diluted share of $0.13 in the third quarter of 2023.
    • Net interest income was $5.06 million in the third quarter of 2024, compared to $4.86 million in the second quarter of 2024, and $5.03 million in the third quarter of 2023.
    • Total revenue, consisting of net interest income and non-interest income, was $5.88 million in the third quarter of 2024, compared to $6.04 million in the preceding quarter and $5.89 million in the third quarter a year ago.
    • Non-interest expense was $5.57 million in the third quarter of 2024, compared to $5.82 million in the preceding quarter, and $5.56 million in the third quarter a year ago. The decrease in non-interest expense during the third quarter of 2024 was largely due to lower salary and employee benefits compared to the prior quarter.
    • Average third quarter 2024 total loans increased 2% to $512.8 million, compared to $503.8 million in the second quarter of 2024, and increased 8% from $473.6 million in the third quarter of 2023. Total loans at September 30, 2024, decreased to $509.5 million from $512.1 million at June 30, 2024, and increased 5% compared to $487.2 million at September 30, 2023.
    • SBA and USDA loan production for the twelve months ended September 30, 2024, totaled 22 loans for $14.5 million, compared to production of 18 loans for $14.8 million in the year-ago period.
    • Average third quarter 2024 total deposits grew 2% to $502.5 million, from $490.8 million in the preceding quarter, and increased 6% from $474.1 million in the third quarter a year ago. Total deposits increased 4% to $512.9 million, at September 30, 2024, compared to $492.1 million at June 30, 2024, and increased 7% compared to $481.5 million at September 30, 2023.
    • The Company recorded an $86,000 provision for credit losses in the third quarter of 2024, compared to a $255,000 provision in the second quarter of 2024, and a $350,000 credit to the provision in the third quarter of 2023.
    • Allowance for loan losses, as a percentage of total loans, was 1.18% at September 30, 2024, compared to 1.19% at June 30, 2024, and 1.16% at September 30, 2023.
    • Nonperforming loans, as a percentage of total loans, was 0.26% at September 30, 2024, compared to 0.24% at June 30, 2024, and 0.09% at September 30, 2023.
    • Nonperforming assets, as a percentage of total assets, was 0.21% at September 30, 2024, compared to 0.20% at June 30, 2024, and 0.19% a year ago.
    • Net charge-offs were $214,000 in the third quarter of 2024, compared to $35,000 in the second quarter of 2024, and $77,000 in the third quarter a year ago.
    • SaviBank capital levels remained above the threshold for well-capitalized institutions with a tier-1 leverage ratio of 8.19% at September 30, 2024.

    About Northwest Washington

    SaviBank currently operates six branches in Skagit County, two branches in Island County, one branch in Whatcom County and one branch in San Juan County. The Skagit, Whatcom, Island and San Juan counties region stretches north from the greater Seattle/Everett/Bellevue metropolis to the Canadian border.

    The housing market in Skagit, Island, Whatcom and San Juan counties remains stable, although it has fallen off the record high levels from the past few years. According to the Northwest Multiple Listing Service, the average home in Skagit County sold for $560,000, up 1.91% in September 30, 2024, compared to a year ago, and there was a 2.37 month supply of homes on the market. For Island County, the average house sold for $605,000, down 0.82% from a year ago and supply totaled 3.18 months. For Whatcom County, the average home sold for $611,000, up 10.38% from a year ago and supply totaled 2.61 months. For San Juan County, the average home sold for $829,000, down from 13.65% a year ago and supply totaled 9.05 months.

    Skagit’s population is projected to grow 3.84% from 2024 through 2029, and median household income is projected to increase by 11.41% during the same time frame. Whatcom County’s population is projected to grow 4.97% from 2024 through 2029, and median household income is projected to increase by 10.99%. Island County’s population is projected to grow 2.24% from 2024 through 2029, and median household income is projected to increase by 12.83%. San Juan County’s population is projected to grow 6.78% from 2024 through 2029, and median household income is projected to increase by 10.88%.

    Sources:
    https://www.nwmls.com/real-estate-news/monthly-market-snapshot/

    https://www.capitaliq.spglobal.com/ 

    About Savi Financial Corporation Inc. and SaviBank

    Savi Financial Corporation is the bank holding company which owns SaviBank. The Bank began operations April 11, 2005, and has 10 branch locations in Anacortes, Burlington, Bellingham, Concrete, Mount Vernon (2), Oak Harbor, Freeland, Sedro-Woolley, and Friday Harbor, Washington. The Bank provides loan and deposit services to customers who are predominantly small and middle-market businesses and individuals in and around Skagit, Island, Whatcom and San Juan counties. As a locally-owned community bank, we believe that when everyone becomes Savi about their finances, our entire community benefits.
    For additional information about SaviBank, visit: www.SaviBank.com.

    About Harborstone Credit Union

    Harborstone Credit Union is a Washington-chartered and federally insured credit union headquartered in Lakewood, Washington. Founded in 1955 as McChord Federal Credit Union, serving airmen on McChord Air Force Base (now Joint Base Lewis McChord), Harborstone Credit Union has grown to become one of the largest credit unions in Washington State with over 91,000 members and approximately $2.1 billion in total assets. Harborstone Credit Union has sixteen branches located throughout King, Pierce, and Thurston counties and offers members a full range of products and services with the aim to assist members in achieving financial well-being through innovative financial solutions that foster thriving communities and economic vitality. For more information, please visit www.harborstone.com.

    Forward Looking Statements

    Certain statements in this news release contain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, such as statements relating to future plans and expectations, and are thus prospective. Such forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties, and other factors, such as the businesses of Harborstone Credit Union and SaviBank may not be integrated successfully or such integration may take longer to accomplish than expected, the expected cost savings and any revenue synergies from the acquisition may not be fully realized within the expected timeframes, disruption from the acquisition may make it more difficult to maintain relationships with customers, associates, or suppliers, the required governmental approvals of the acquisition may not be obtained on the proposed terms and schedule, or Savi Financial shareholders may not approve the acquisition, any of which could cause actual results to differ materially from future results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Although we believe that the assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements are reasonable, any of the assumptions could prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, we can give no assurance that the results contemplated in the forward-looking statements will be realized. The inclusion of this forward-looking information should not be construed as a representation by the companies or any person that the future events, plans, or expectations contemplated by the companies will be achieved. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements concerning the companies or any person acting on their behalf is expressly qualified in its entirety by the cautionary statements above. None of Harborstone Credit Union, Savi Financial or SaviBank undertake any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise, to reflect circumstances or events that occur after the date the forward-looking statements are made.

     
    SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA                           
    (In thousands of dollars, except for ratios and per share amounts)                      
    Unaudited                              
      Three Months Ended   Nine Months Ended
      September 30,
    2024    		   September 30,
    2023    		   Var %   June 30,
    2024    		   Var %   September 30,
    2024    		   September 30,
    2023    		   Var %
    SUMMARY OF OPERATIONS                              
    Interest income $ 8,756     $ 7,573     16 %   $ 8,371     5 %   $ 24,962     $ 21,092     18 %
    Interest expense   (3,698 )     (2,539 )   46       (3,509 )   5       (10,411 )     (6,092 )   71  
    Net interest income   5,058       5,034     0       4,862     4       14,551       15,000     (3 )
    Provision for loan losses   (86 )     350     (125 )     (255 )   (66 )     (578 )     539     (207 )
                                                             
    NII after loss provision   4,972       5,384     (8 )     4,607     8       13,973       15,539     (10 )
    Non-interest income   825       852     (3 )     1,181     (30 )     2,587       2,796     (7 )
    Non-interest expense   (5,566 )     (5,559 )   0       (5,823 )   (4 )     (16,920 )     (16,415 )   3  
    Income before tax   231       677     (66 )     (35 )   (760 )     (360 )     1,920     (119 )
    Federal income tax expense   26       119     (78 )     (30 )   (187 )     (144 )     333     (143 )
    Net income $ 205     $ 558     (63 )%   $ (5 )   (4,200 )%   $ (216 )   $ 1,587     (114 )%
                                   
    PER COMMON SHARE DATA                              
    Number of shares outstanding (000s)   3,465       3,460     0 %     3,465     — %     3,465       3,460     0.14 %
    Earnings per share, basic $ 0.06     $ 0.16     (63 )   $ (0.00 )   (4,200 )   $ (0.06 )   $ 0.46     (114 )
    Earnings per share, diluted $ 0.05     $ 0.13     (63 )   $ (0.00 )   (4,201 )   $ (0.05 )   $ 0.36     (114 )
    Market value   14.50       6.86     111       14.79     (2 )     14.50       6.86     111  
    Book value   10.93       10.95     (0 )     10.61     3       10.93       10.95     (0 )
    Market value to book value   132.63 %     62.65 %   112       139.40 %   (5 )     132.63 %     62.65 %   112  
                                   
    BALANCE SHEET DATA                              
    Assets $ 623,637     $ 591,370     5 %   $ 621,191     0 %   $ 623,637     $ 591,370     5 %
    Investments securities   36,629       35,140     4       34,698     6       36,629       35,140     4  
    Total loans   509,535       487,184     5       512,080     (0 )     509,535       487,184     5  
    Total deposits   512,912       481,476     7       492,140     4       512,912       481,476     7  
    Borrowings   52,500       52,500     –       72,000     (27 )     52,500       52,500     –  
    Sub Debt – Savi Financial Only   17,000       17,000     –       17,000     –       17,000       17,000     –  
    Shareholders’ equity   37,881       37,887     (0 )     36,777     3       37,881       37,887     (0 )
                                   
    AVERAGE BALANCE SHEET DATA                              
    Average assets $ 622,414     $ 583,931     7 %   $ 612,262     2 %   $ 608,559     $ 557,460     9 %
    Average total loans   512,751       473,590     8       503,793     2       502,860       459,765     9  
    Average total deposits   502,526       474,076     6       490,753     2       498,373       456,093     9  
    Average shareholders’ equity   37,329       37,812     (1 )     36,678     2       37,534       37,082     1  
                                   
    ASSET QUALITY RATIOS                              
    Net (charge-offs) recoveries $ (214 )   $ (77 )   N/M     $ (35 )   N/M     $ (422 )   $ (266 )   N/M  
    Net (charge-offs) recoveries to average loans   (0.17 )%     (0.07 )%   N/M       (0.03 )%   N/M       (0.11 )%     (0.08 )%   N/M  
    Non-performing loans as a % of loans   0.26       0.09     183       0.24     6       0.26       0.09     183  
    Non-performing assets as a % of assets   0.21       0.19     10       0.20     4       0.21       0.19     10  
    Allowance for loan losses as a % of total loans   1.18       1.16     2       1.19     (1 )     1.18       1.16     2  
    Allowance for loan losses as a % of non-performing loans   462.69       1,223.59     (62 )     492.30     (6 )     462.69       1,223.59     (62 )
                                   
    FINANCIAL RATIOSSTATISTICS                              
    Return on average equity   2.20 %     5.90 %   (63 )%     -0.05 %   (4,128 )%     -0.77 %     5.71 %   (113 )%
    Return on average assets   0.13       0.38     (66 )     (0.00 )   (4,133 )     (0.05 )     0.38     (112 )
    Net interest margin   3.52       3.66     (4 )     3.48     1       3.47       3.77     (8 )
    Efficiency ratio   81.59       92.23     (12 )     83.37     (2 )     85.53       92.24     (7 )
    Average number of employees (FTE)   136       145     (6 )     140     (3 )     142       146     (3 )
                                   
    CAPITAL RATIOS                              
                                   
    Tier 1 leverage ratio — Bank   8.19       8.24     (1 )%     8.27     (1 )%     8.19       8.24     (1 )%
    Common equity tier 1 ratio — Bank   9.59       9.08     6       9.36     2       9.59       9.08     6  
    Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio — Bank   9.59       9.08     6       9.36     2       9.59       9.08     6  
    Total risk-based capital ratio –Bank   10.78       10.22     5       10.56     2       10.78       10.22     5  
                                   

    Contact:
    Michal D. Cann
    Chairman & President
    Savi Financial Corporation
    (360) 399-7001

    The MIL Network –

  • MIL-OSI Security: Holland Man Sentenced For Sexual Exploitation Of A Child, Penalties For Registered Sex Offenders

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

              GRAND RAPIDS, MICHIGAN — U.S. Attorney for the Western District of Michigan Mark Totten today announced that Jared Hanner, 32, of Holland, was sentenced to 35 years in federal prison for Sexual Exploitation of a Child and Penalties for Registered Sex Offenders. Hanner previously pleaded guilty to the charges and faced a mandatory 35-year prison sentence.

              “Sexual exploitation crimes against our children are especially egregious,” said U.S. Attorney Mark Totten. “We will continue to hold sexual predators and their coconspirators accountable by working with our law enforcement partners to secure a measure of justice for the minor victims and prevent future harm.”

              Last year, Hanner met Tasha Erin Blake, 38, of Grand Haven, online and convinced her to text him explicit photos of a minor in her care and custody, under 13 years of age. Blake complied, but subsequently confessed her actions to the police. Law enforcement executed a search warrant on Hanner’s phone and found the explicit photos and his request for them. Blake pleaded guilty to Distribution of Child Pornography earlier this year and was sentenced to 18 years in federal prison.

              “Anyone who means to manipulate and sexually exploit children should face severe consequences, and the FBI will never stop seeking justice for victims,” said Cheyvoryea Gibson, Special Agent in Charge of the FBI in Michigan. “This sentencing would not be possible without the dedicated work of our FBI West Michigan Based Child Exploitation Task Force (WEBCHEX) and collaboration with our law enforcement partners who we remain committed to working alongside to protect our communities.”

              The Federal Bureau of Investigation, Grand Haven Department of Public Safety, Ottawa County Sheriff’s Office, and Kent County Sheriff’s Office investigated the case. Assistant U.S. Attorney Doaa Al-Howaishy prosecuted it.

              This case is part of Project Safe Childhood, a nationwide initiative designed to protect children from online exploitation and abuse. The U.S. Attorney’s Office, county prosecutor’s offices, the Internet Crimes Against Children task force (ICAC), federal, state, tribal, and local law enforcement are working closely together to locate, apprehend, and prosecute individuals who exploit children. The partners in Project Safe Childhood work to educate local communities about the dangers of online child exploitation, and to teach children how to protect themselves. For more information about Project Safe Childhood, visit www.projectsafechildhood.gov. Individuals with information or concerns about possible child exploitation should contact local law enforcement officials.

    ###

    MIL Security OSI –

  • MIL-OSI: First Financial Northwest, Inc. Reports Third Quarter 2024 Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    RENTON, Wash., Oct. 29, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — First Financial Northwest, Inc. (the “Company”) (NASDAQ GS: FFNW), the holding company for First Financial Northwest Bank (the “Bank”), today reported a net loss of $608,000, or $(0.07) per diluted share, for the quarter ended September 30, 2024, compared to net income of $1.6 million, or $0.17 per diluted share, for the quarter ended June 30, 2024, and net income of $1.5 million, or $0.16 per diluted share, for the quarter ended September 30, 2023. For the nine months ended September 30, 2024, the Company reported a net loss of $128,000, or $(0.01) per diluted share, compared to net income of $5.1 million, or $0.56 per diluted share, for the comparable period in 2023.

    The net loss for the quarter was primarily the result of a $1.6 million provision for credit losses. Our allowance for credit losses (“ACL”) analysis determined that a provision for credit losses of $1.6 million was appropriate as of September 30, 2024. This provision mainly relates to two participation loans totaling $6.0 million, for which we are not the lead lender. These loans, secured by short-term rehabilitation and assisted living facilities, have been individually evaluated and classified as “substandard” since March 2022 due to a decline in demand for the services provided at such facilities post-COVID. While payments on the loans were current as of September 30, 2024, updated appraisals received during the quarter resulted in an increase in our ACL. The loan guarantors are under contract to sell another property, with the sale expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2024. Proceeds from this sale are expected to be applied to the two loans, which would improve our position. Additionally, the guarantors reported interest from a national real estate developer in purchasing one of the facilities, though no purchase agreement was entered into as of September 30, 2024. The ACL was also impacted by higher forecasted unemployment rates and increased construction and land development loan balances. Additionally, reserves for unfunded commitments increased by $75,000 due to increased construction lending activity during the quarter.

    “While we recorded a provision for credit losses during the quarter ended September 30, 2024, our credit quality remained strong, with only $853,000 in nonaccrual loans relative to our $1.14 billion total loan portfolio. Our strong credit quality is directly related to our top-notch lending department employees who originate, document and underwrite these loans,” stated Joseph W. Kiley III, President and CEO.

    “We also continue to work closely with Global Federal Credit Union (“Global”) to prepare for the closing of the pending transaction and to ensure a smooth transition for our customers and employees. I truly appreciate the efforts and patience of our employees, customers, and shareholders as we await the final required approval from the National Credit Union Administration before we can close the transaction,” concluded Kiley.

    Highlights for the quarter ended September 30, 2024:

    • Net loans receivable totaled $1.13 billion at September 30, 2024, down $8.9 million from the prior quarter end.
    • Book value per share was $17.39 at September 30, 2024, compared to $17.51 at June 30, 2024, and $17.35 at September 30, 2023.
    • The Bank’s Tier 1 leverage and total capital ratios were 10.9% and 16.7% at September 30, 2024, compared to 10.9% and 16.6% at June 30, 2024, and 10.3% and 16.0% at September 30, 2023, respectively.
    • Credit quality remained strong with nonaccrual loans totaling only $853,000, or 0.07% of total loans.
    • A $1.6 million provision for credit losses was recorded in the current quarter, compared to a $200,000 recapture of provision for credit losses in the prior quarter and a $300,000 recapture of provision for credit losses in the comparable quarter in 2023.

    Deposits totaled $1.17 billion at September 30, 2024, compared to $1.09 billion at June 30, 2024, and $1.21 billion at September 30, 2023. The $79.2 million increase in deposits at September 30, 2024, compared to June 30, 2024, was due primarily to a $81.9 million increase in retail certificates of deposit and a $624,000 increase in noninterest-bearing demand deposits, partially offset by a $1.5 million, $1.4 million, $392,000, and $104,000 decline in interest-bearing demand deposits, money market deposits, savings and brokered deposits, respectively. The increased deposits were used to pay down our FHLB advances to $100.0 million at September 30, 2024, from $176.0 million at June 30, 2024.

    Advances from the FHLB totaled $100.0 million at September 30, 2024, down from $176.0 million at June 30, 2024, and $125.0 million at September 30, 2023, as the increase in deposits during the current quarter allowed us to reduce our reliance on FHLB advances. At September 30, 2024, the $100.0 million in FHLB advances were tied to cash flow hedge agreements where the Bank pays a fixed rate and receives a variable rate in return to assist in the Bank’s interest rate risk management efforts. These cash flow hedge agreements had a weighted average remaining term of 30.8 months and a weighted average fixed interest rate of 1.93% as of September 30, 2024. The average cost of borrowings was 3.19% for the quarter ended September 30, 2024, compared to 2.64% for the quarter ended June 30, 2024, and 2.42% for the quarter ended September 30, 2023.

    The following table presents a breakdown of our total deposits (unaudited):

      Sep 30,
    2024    		   Jun 30,
    2024    		   Sep 30,
    2023    		   Three
    Month
    Change    		   One
    Year
    Change
    Deposits: (Dollars in thousands)
    Noninterest-bearing demand $ 100,466   $ 99,842   $ 104,164   $ 624     $ (3,698 )
    Interest-bearing demand   55,506     57,033     60,816     (1,527 )     (5,310 )
    Savings   17,031     17,423     18,844     (392 )     (1,813 )
    Money market   495,978     497,345     501,168     (1,367 )     (5,190 )
    Certificates of deposit, retail   447,474     365,527     349,446     81,947       98,028  
    Brokered deposits   50,900     51,004     175,972     (104 )     (125,072 )
    Total deposits $ 1,167,355   $ 1,088,174   $ 1,210,410   $ 79,181     $ (43,055 )
     

    The following tables present an analysis of total deposits by branch office (unaudited):

    September 30, 2024
      Noninterest-bearing demand Interest-bearing demand Savings Money
    market    		 Certificates of deposit, retail Brokered
    deposits    		 Total
      (Dollars in thousands)
    King County              
    Renton $ 29,388 $ 14,153 $ 10,654 $ 305,836 $ 315,721 $ – $ 675,752
    Landing   3,442   1,660   237   8,348   12,733   –   26,420
    Woodinville   1,968   2,234   959   8,852   11,522   –   25,535
    Bothell   2,965   1,151   401   1,536   5,918   –   11,971
    Crossroads   14,770   2,039   107   31,665   18,136   –   66,717
    Kent   5,417   10,502   44   16,053   8,562   –   40,578
    Kirkland   10,967   1,890   206   11,243   2,240   –   26,546
    Issaquah   1,186   294   18   2,547   6,580   –   10,625
    Total King County   70,103   33,923   12,626   386,080   381,412   –   884,144
    Snohomish County              
    Mill Creek   3,990   2,171   384   14,628   10,312   –   31,485
    Edmonds   9,254   6,831   330   18,549   13,281   –   48,245
    Clearview   5,587   5,242   1,462   21,206   12,251   –   45,748
    Lake Stevens   3,970   4,282   1,244   23,257   15,571   –   48,324
    Smokey Point   2,994   1,664   969   29,353   11,387   –   46,367
    Total Snohomish County   25,795   20,190   4,389   106,993   62,802   –   220,169
    Pierce County              
    University Place   2,940   53   4   1,848   1,458   –   6,303
    Gig Harbor   1,628   1,340   12   1,057   1,802   –   5,839
    Total Pierce County   4,568   1,393   16   2,905   3,260   –   12,142
                   
    Brokered deposits   –   –   –   –   –   50,900   50,900
                   
    Total deposits $ 100,466 $ 55,506 $ 17,031 $ 495,978 $ 447,474 $ 50,900 $ 1,167,355
    June 30, 2024
      Noninterest-bearing demand Interest-bearing demand Savings Money
    market    		 Certificates of deposit, retail Brokered
    deposits    		 Total
      (Dollars in thousands)
    King County              
    Renton $ 30,336 $ 14,380 $ 11,186 $ 306,176 $ 246,076 $ – $ 608,154
    Landing   2,079   566   113   7,895   9,881   –   20,534
    Woodinville   1,953   2,949   987   10,931   10,845   –   27,665
    Bothell   3,336   847   398   1,595   6,055   –   12,231
    Crossroads   13,585   2,858   28   25,599   17,748   –   59,818
    Kent   7,729   8,142   42   14,525   7,448   –   37,886
    Kirkland   8,326   1,789   210   15,007   1,752   –   27,084
    Issaquah   1,287   232   22   3,971   6,202   –   11,714
    Total King County   68,631   31,763   12,986   385,699   306,007   –   805,086
    Snohomish County              
    Mill Creek   5,823   2,306   420   15,209   9,578   –   33,336
    Edmonds   10,418   9,470   402   20,255   12,753   –   53,298
    Clearview   4,810   4,888   1,444   18,695   9,504   –   39,341
    Lake Stevens   4,111   4,445   1,171   22,618   14,090   –   46,435
    Smokey Point   2,700   3,152   982   31,808   10,435   –   49,077
    Total Snohomish County   27,862   24,261   4,419   108,585   56,360   –   221,487
    Pierce County              
    University Place   2,385   41   2   1,819   1,503   –   5,750
    Gig Harbor   964   968   16   1,242   1,657   –   4,847
    Total Pierce County   3,349   1,009   18   3,061   3,160   –   10,597
                   
    Brokered deposits   –   –   –   –   –   51,004   51,004
                   
    Total deposits $ 99,842 $ 57,033 $ 17,423 $ 497,345 $ 365,527 $ 51,004 $ 1,088,174
     

    Net loans receivable totaled $1.13 billion at September 30, 2024, compared to $1.14 billion at June 30, 2024, and $1.17 billion at September 30, 2023. During the quarter ended September 30, 2024, loan repayments outpaced new loan fundings across all loan categories except construction and land development. The average balance of net loans receivable totaled $1.13 billion for the quarter ended September 30, 2024, compared to $1.14 billion for the quarter ended June 30, 2024, and $1.17 billion for the quarter ended September 30, 2023.

    The ACL represented 1.42% of total loans receivable at September 30, 2024, compared to 1.29% at both June 30, 2024, and September 30, 2023.

    Nonaccrual loans totaled $853,000 at September 30, 2024, compared to $4.7 million at June 30, 2024, and $201,000 at September 30, 2023. The decrease compared to the prior quarter was due primarily to the payoff of a $4.1 million commercial real estate loan that had been reported as nonaccrual as of June 30, 2024. The Bank did not incur any loss related to this credit. Additionally, there was no other real estate owned at September 30, 2024, June 30, 2024, or September 30, 2023.

    Net interest income totaled $8.5 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2024, compared to $9.0 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2024, and $9.7 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2023.

    Total interest income was $19.4 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2024, compared to $19.3 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2024, and $19.7 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2023. The increase in total interest income during the current quarter was primarily due to interest income on interest-earning deposits held with banks which increased to $863,000 in the quarter ended September 30, 2024, up 79.0% from $482,000 in the quarter ended June 30, 2024, partially offset by decreases in interest income on loans and investments of $147,000 or 0.9% and $142,000 or 7.5%, respectively. The decrease in total interest income during the current quarter compared to the comparable quarter in 2023, was primarily due to decreases in interest income on loans of $260,000 or 1.5% and on investments of $374,000 or 17.7%, partially offset by increases in interest income on interest-earning deposits held with banks and dividends on FHLB stock of $338,000 or 64.4% and $37,000 or 32.7%, respectively.

    Yield on loans decreased to 5.86% during the recent quarter from 5.93% for the quarter ended June 30, 2024, and increased from 5.73% for the quarter ended September 30, 2023. During the June 30, 2024 quarter, the Bank modified over $130 million in loans under its agreement with Global, resulting in a $214,000 increase in net deferred loan fees and costs, which increased the loan yield. In the most recent quarter, these fees and costs decreased by $266,000. The yield on investment securities for the current quarter was 4.30%, down from 4.38% last quarter and up from 3.98% a year ago.

    Total interest expense was $11.0 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2024, compared to $10.3 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2024, and $10.0 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2023. The increase from the quarters ended June 30, 2024 and September 30, 2023, was due to increases in funding costs. Interest expense on deposits increased $250,000 or 2.6% to $9.7 million, while interest expense on other borrowings increased $364,000 or 42.9% to $1.2 million during the current quarter, compared to the prior quarter. The increase in interest expense on deposits was primarily due to a $32.5 million increase in the average balances of certificates of deposit, partially offset by declines of $28.9 million and $10.7 million in the average balances of brokered deposits and money market deposits, respectively. In addition, the average cost of interest-bearing deposits was 3.80% for the quarter ended September 30, 2024, up from 3.71% for the quarter ended June 30, 2024. The increase in interest expense on other borrowings was due to a $22.4 million increase in the average balance of borrowings, coupled with a 55-basis point increase in the average cost of other borrowings to 3.19% during the quarter ended September 30, 2024, compared to the prior quarter. The increase in interest expense during the current quarter compared to the same quarter in 2023, was also due to increases in both the average balance and cost of outstanding borrowings, which increased by $26.1 million and 77 basis points, respectively.

    Net interest margin was 2.46% for the quarter ended September 30, 2024, compared to 2.66% for the quarter ended June 30, 2024, and 2.69% for the quarter ended September 30, 2023. The decrease in the net interest margin for the quarter ended September 30, 2024, was due primarily to continued pressure on funding costs. The average yield on interest-earning assets decreased seven basis points to 5.66% during the quarter ended September 30, 2024, from 5.73% during the quarter ended June 30, 2024, and increased 20 basis points from 5.46% during the quarter ended September 30, 2023. The average cost of interest-bearing liabilities increased 13 basis points to 3.72% during the quarter, from 3.59% during the quarter ended June 30, 2024, and increased 48 basis points from 3.24% during the quarter ended September 30, 2023. The net interest margin for the month of September 2024 was 2.49%.

    Noninterest income for the quarter ended September 30, 2024, totaled $677,000, up slightly from $673,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2024, and unchanged from $677,000 for the quarter ended September 30, 2023. The increase compared to the quarter ended June 30, 2024, was primarily due to fluctuations related to our fintech focused venture capital investment more than offsetting the decreases in BOLI income, wealth management revenue and deposit and loan related fees in the quarter.

    Noninterest expense totaled $8.5 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2024, compared to $7.9 million for the prior quarter, and $8.8 million for the same period in 2023. The increase from the June 30, 2024 quarter was primarily due to a $789,000 increase in salaries and employee benefits. This was because the June 2024 quarter included $939,000 in deferred loan costs related to loan modifications, which reduced salary and employee benefit expenses, compared to $117,000 in deferred loan costs in the quarter ended September 30, 2024. Partially offsetting this was a $411,000 refund from the defined benefit plan buyout following a final census review of remaining plan participants. Professional fees also declined by $164,000 in the current quarter, largely due to a $101,000 decline in transaction-related expenses and a $54,000 decline in legal fees. Compared to the September 30, 2023 quarter, the decline in noninterest expense was primarily due to a $412,000 decrease in salaries and employee benefits, a $51,000 decrease in marketing expenses, a $35,000 decline in regulatory assessments, and $10,000 in lower occupancy and equipment expense. These reductions were partially offset by higher data processing, other general and administrative expenses and professional fees.

    First Financial Northwest, Inc. is the parent company of First Financial Northwest Bank; an FDIC insured Washington State-chartered commercial bank headquartered in Renton, Washington, serving the Puget Sound Region through 15 full-service banking offices. For additional information about us, please visit our website at ffnwb.com and click on the “Investor Relations” link at the bottom of the page.

    Forward-looking statements:
    When used in this press release and in other documents filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), in press releases or other public stockholder communications, or in oral statements made with the approval of an authorized executive officer, the words or phrases “believe,” “will,” “will likely result,” “are expected to,” “will continue,” “is anticipated,” “estimate,” “project,” “plans,” or similar expressions are intended to identify “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are not historical facts but instead represent management’s current expectations and forecasts regarding future events many of which are inherently uncertain and outside of our control. Forward-looking statements include statements with respect to our beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, expectations, assumptions and statements about, among other things, our pending transaction with Global Federal Credit Union (“Global”) whereby Global, pursuant to the definitive purchase and assumption agreement (the “P&A Agreement”), will acquire substantially all of the assets and assume substantially all of the liabilities of the Bank, expectations of the business environment in which we operate, projections of future performance or financial items, perceived opportunities in the market, potential future credit experience, and statements regarding our mission and vision. These forward-looking statements are based on current management expectations and may, therefore, involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ, possibly materially from those currently expected or projected in these forward-looking statements made by, or on behalf of, us and could negatively affect our operating and stock performance. Factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements, include, but are not limited to, the following: the occurrence of any event, change or other circumstances that could give rise to the right of one or all of the parties to terminate the P&A Agreement; delays in completing the P&A Agreement; the failure to obtain necessary regulatory approvals or to satisfy any of the other conditions to the Global transaction, including the P&A Agreement, on a timely basis or at all; delays or other circumstances arising from the dissolution of the Bank and the Company following completion of the P&A Agreement; diversion of management’s attention from ongoing business operations and opportunities during the pending Global transaction; potential adverse reactions or changes to business or employee relationships, including those resulting from the announcement of the Global transaction; adverse impacts to economic conditions in our local market areas, other markets where the Company has lending relationships, or other aspects of the Company’s business operations or financial markets, including, without limitation, as a result of employment levels, labor shortages and the effects of inflation, a recession or slowed economic growth; changes in the interest rate environment, including increases or decreases in the Federal Reserve benchmark rate and duration at which such interest rate levels are maintained, which could adversely affect our revenues and expenses, the value of assets and obligations, and the availability and cost of capital and liquidity; the impact of inflation and the current and future monetary policies of the Federal Reserve in response thereto; the effects of any federal government shutdown; increased competitive pressures; legislative and regulatory changes; the impact of bank failures or adverse developments at other banks and related negative press about the banking industry in general on investor and depositor sentiment; disruptions, security breaches, or other adverse events, failures or interruptions in, or attacks on, our information technology systems or on the third-party vendors who perform several of our critical processing functions; effects of critical accounting policies and judgments, including the use of estimates in determining the fair value of certain of our assets, which estimates may prove to be incorrect and result in significant declines in valuation; the effects of climate change, severe weather events, natural disasters, pandemics, epidemics and other public health crises, acts of war or terrorism, civil unrest and other external events on our business; and other factors described in the Company’s latest Annual Report on Form 10-K and Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and other reports filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission – that are available on our website at www.ffnwb.com and on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

    Any of the forward-looking statements that we make in this Press Release and in the other public statements are based upon management’s beliefs and assumptions at the time they are made and may turn out to be wrong because of the inaccurate assumptions we might make, because of the factors illustrated above or because of other factors that we cannot foresee. Therefore, these factors should be considered in evaluating the forward-looking statements, and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. We do not undertake and specifically disclaim any obligation to revise any forward-looking statements to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events or circumstances after the date of such statements.

    For more information, contact:
    Joseph W. Kiley III, President and Chief Executive Officer
    Rich Jacobson, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
    (425) 255-4400

    FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    Consolidated Balance Sheets
    (Dollars in thousands)
    (Unaudited)
     
    Assets Sep 30,
    2024    		   Jun 30,
    2024    		   Sep 30,
    2023    		   Three
    Month
    Change    		   One
    Year
    Change
                       
    Cash on hand and in banks $ 8,423     $ 10,811     $ 8,074     (22.1 )%   4.3 %
    Interest-earning deposits with banks   72,884       48,173       49,618     51.3     46.9  
    Investments available-for-sale, at fair value   156,609       160,693       204,975     (2.5 )   (23.6 )
    Investments held-to-maturity, at amortized cost   2,462       2,456       2,450     0.2     0.5  
    Loans receivable, net of allowance of $16,265, $14,796, and $15,306 respectively   1,126,146       1,135,067       1,168,079     (0.8 )   (3.6 )
    Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) stock, at cost   5,403       8,823       6,803     (38.8 )   (20.6 )
    Accrued interest receivable   6,638       6,632       7,263     0.1     (8.6 )
    Deferred tax assets, net   2,690       2,360       3,156     14.0     (14.8 )
    Premises and equipment, net   18,584       19,007       19,921     (2.2 )   (6.7 )
    Bank owned life insurance (“BOLI”), net   38,661       38,368       37,398     0.8     3.4  
    Prepaid expenses and other assets   8,898       11,447       13,673     (22.3 )   (34.9 )
    Right of use asset (“ROU”), net   2,473       2,670       2,818     (7.4 )   (12.2 )
    Goodwill   889       889       889     0.0     0.0  
    Core deposit intangible, net   326       357       451     (8.7 )   (27.7 )
    Total assets $ 1,451,086     $ 1,447,753     $ 1,525,568     0.2     (4.9 )
                       
    Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity                  
                       
    Deposits                  
    Noninterest-bearing deposits $ 100,466     $ 99,842     $ 104,164     0.6     (3.6 )
    Interest-bearing deposits   1,066,889       988,332       1,106,246     7.9     (3.6 )
    Total deposits   1,167,355       1,088,174       1,210,410     7.3     (3.6 )
    Advances from the FHLB   100,000       176,000       125,000     (43.2 )   (20.0 )
    Advance payments from borrowers for taxes and insurance   5,211       2,764       4,760     88.5     9.5  
    Lease liability, net   2,673       2,866       3,011     (6.7 )   (11.2 )
    Accrued interest payable   294       1,117       2,646     (73.7 )   (88.9 )
    Other liabilities   15,340       16,139       20,506     (5.0 )   (25.2 )
    Total liabilities   1,290,873       1,287,060       1,366,333     0.3     (5.5 )
                       
    Commitments and contingencies                  
                       
    Stockholders’ Equity                  
    Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; authorized 10,000,000 shares; no shares issued or outstanding   –       –       –     n/a   n/a
    Common stock, $0.01 par value; authorized 90,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding                  
    9,213,969 shares at September 30, 2024; 9,179,825 shares at June 30, 2024; and 9,179,510 shares at September 30, 2023   92       92       92     0.0     0.0  
    Additional paid-in capital   72,916       72,953       72,926     (0.1 )   (0.0 )
    Retained earnings   93,692       94,300       96,206     (0.6 )   (2.6 )
    Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax   (6,487 )     (6,652 )     (9,989 )   (2.5 )   (35.1 )
    Total stockholders’ equity   160,213       160,693       159,235     (0.3 )   0.6  
    Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $ 1,451,086     $ 1,447,753     $ 1,525,568     0.2 %   (4.9 )%
    FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    Consolidated Income Statements
    (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
    (Unaudited)
     
      Quarter Ended        
      Sep 30,
    2024    		   Jun 30,
    2024    		   Sep 30,
    2023    		   Three
    Month
    Change    		   One
    Year
    Change
    Interest income                  
    Loans, including fees $ 16,658     $ 16,805     $ 16,918     (0.9 )%   (1.5 )%
    Investments   1,744       1,886       2,118     (7.5 )   (17.7 )
    Interest-earning deposits with banks   863       482       525     79.0     64.4  
    Dividends on FHLB Stock   150       144       113     4.2     32.7  
    Total interest income   19,415       19,317       19,674     0.5     (1.3 )
    Interest expense                  
    Deposits   9,748       9,498       9,205     2.6     5.9  
    Other borrowings   1,213       849       766     42.9     58.4  
    Total interest expense   10,961       10,347       9,971     5.9     9.9  
    Net interest income   8,454       8,970       9,703     (5.8 )   (12.9 )
    Provision (recapture of provision) for credit losses   1,575       (200 )     (300 )   (887.5 )   (625.0 )
    Net interest income after provision (recapture of provision) for credit losses   6,879       9,170       10,003     (25.0 )   (31.2 )
                       
    Noninterest income                  
    BOLI income   295       310       244     (4.8 )   20.9  
    Wealth management revenue   42       54       53     (22.2 )   (20.8 )
    Deposit related fees   236       240       247     (1.7 )   (4.5 )
    Loan related fees   96       97       79     (1.0 )   21.5  
    Other income (expense), net   8       (28 )     54     (128.6 )   (85.2 )
    Total noninterest income   677       673       677     0.6     0.0  
                       
    Noninterest expense                  
    Salaries and employee benefits   4,606       3,817       5,018     20.7     (8.2 )
    Occupancy and equipment   1,183       1,225       1,193     (3.4 )   (0.8 )
    Professional fees   585       749       553     (21.9 )   5.8  
    Data processing   838       856       742     (2.1 )   12.9  
    Regulatory assessments   165       170       200     (2.9 )   (17.5 )
    Insurance and bond premiums   113       118       111     (4.2 )   1.8  
    Marketing   46       47       97     (2.1 )   (52.6 )
    Other general and administrative   952       959       856     (0.7 )   11.2  
    Total noninterest expense   8,488       7,941       8,770     6.9     (3.2 )
    (Loss) income before federal income tax (benefit) provision   (932 )     1,902       1,910     (149.0 )   (148.8 )
    Federal income tax (benefit) provision   (324 )     347       409     (193.4 )   (179.2 )
    Net (loss) income $ (608 )   $ 1,555     $ 1,501     (139.1 )%   (140.5 )%
                       
    Basic (loss) earnings per share $ (0.07 )   $ 0.17     $ 0.16          
    Diluted (loss) earnings per share $ (0.07 )   $ 0.17     $ 0.16          
    Weighted average number of common shares outstanding   9,190,146       9,168,414       9,127,568          
    Weighted average number of diluted shares outstanding   9,190,146       9,235,446       9,150,059          
     

    The following table presents a breakdown of the loan portfolio (unaudited):

      September 30, 2024 June 30, 2024 September 30, 2023
      Amount   Percent   Amount   Percent   Amount   Percent
      (Dollars in thousands)
    Commercial real estate:                      
    Residential:                      
    Multifamily $ 132,811     11.6 %   $ 134,302     11.7 %   $ 140,022     11.7 %
    Total multifamily residential   132,811     11.6       134,302     11.7       140,022     11.7  
                           
    Non-residential:                      
    Retail   118,840     10.4       118,154     10.4       130,101     11.0  
    Office   73,778     6.5       74,032     6.4       72,773     6.1  
    Hotel / motel   54,716     4.8       55,018     4.8       63,954     5.4  
    Storage   32,443     2.8       32,636     2.8       33,229     2.8  
    Mobile home park   22,443     2.0       23,159     2.0       21,285     1.8  
    Warehouse   18,743     1.6       18,868     1.6       19,446     1.6  
    Nursing Home   11,407     1.0       11,474     1.0       11,676     1.0  
    Other non-residential   30,719     2.7       32,139     2.8       42,227     3.7  
    Total non-residential   363,089     31.8       365,480     31.8       394,691     33.4  
                           
    Construction/land:                      
    One-to-four family residential   42,846     3.8       39,908     3.5       43,532     3.7  
    Multifamily   7,227     0.6       6,078     0.5       2,043     0.2  
    Land development   10,148     0.8       9,800     0.8       9,766     0.8  
    Total construction/land   60,221     5.2       55,786     4.8       55,341     4.7  
                           
    One-to-four family residential:                      
    Permanent owner occupied   279,744     24.5       283,516     24.7       260,970     22.1  
    Permanent non-owner occupied   221,127     19.4       225,423     19.6       232,238     19.6  
    Total one-to-four family residential   500,871     43.9       508,939     44.3       493,208     41.7  
                           
    Business:                      
    Aircraft   –     0.0       –     0.0       1,981     0.2  
    Small Business Administration (“SBA”)   1,745     0.2       1,763     0.2       1,810     0.3  
    Paycheck Protection Plan (“PPP”)   238     0.0       316     0.0       551     0.0  
    Other business   12,416     1.1       12,984     1.1       23,633     1.9  
    Total business   14,399     1.3       15,063     1.3       27,975     2.4  
                           
    Consumer:                      
    Classic, collectible and other auto   58,085     5.1       56,758     4.9       59,955     5.1  
    Other consumer   12,935     1.1       13,535     1.2       12,193     1.0  
    Total consumer   71,020     6.2       70,293     6.1       72,148     6.1  
                           
    Total loans   1,142,411     100.0 %     1,149,863     100.0 %     1,183,385     100.0 %
    Less:                      
    ACL   16,265           14,796           15,306      
    Loans receivable, net $ 1,126,146         $ 1,135,067         $ 1,168,079      
                           
    Concentrations of credit: (1)                      
    Construction loans as % of total capital   36.8 %         34.8 %         37.8 %    
    Total non-owner occupied commercial
    real estate as % of total capital    		   296.2 %         298.8 %         328.1 %    
     

    (1) Concentrations of credit percentages are for First Financial Northwest Bank only using classifications in accordance with FDIC regulatory guidelines.

    FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    Key Financial Measures
    (Unaudited)
     
      At or For the Quarter Ended
      Sep 30,   Jun 30,   Mar 31,   Dec 31,   Sep 30,
        2024       2024       2024       2023       2023  
      (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
    Performance Ratios: (1)                  
    Return on assets   (0.17 )%     0.43 %     (0.29 )%     0.31 %     0.39 %
    Return on equity   (1.50 )     3.88       (2.67 )     2.97       3.71  
    Dividend payout ratio   0.00       76.47       (108.33 )     100.00       79.26  
    Equity-to-assets ratio   11.04       11.10       10.91       10.74       10.44  
    Tangible equity ratio (2)   10.97       11.02       10.83       10.66       10.36  
    Net interest margin   2.46       2.66       2.55       2.54       2.69  
    Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities   116.46       117.01       116.40       115.84       116.94  
    Efficiency ratio   92.96       82.35       116.97       85.17       84.49  
    Noninterest expense as a percent of average total assets   2.32       2.21       3.05       2.18       2.29  
    Book value per common share $ 17.39     $ 17.51     $ 17.46     $ 17.61     $ 17.35  
    Tangible book value per share (2)   17.26       17.37       17.32       17.47       17.20  
                       
    Capital Ratios: (3)                  
    Tier 1 leverage ratio   10.86 %     10.91 %     10.41 %     10.18 %     10.25 %
    Common equity tier 1 capital ratio   15.43       15.39       14.98       14.90       14.75  
    Tier 1 capital ratio   15.43       15.39       14.98       14.90       14.75  
    Total capital ratio   16.68       16.64       16.24       16.15       16.00  
                       
    Asset Quality Ratios: (4)                  
    Nonaccrual loans as a percent of total loans   0.07 %     0.41 %     0.02 %     0.02 %     0.02 %
    Nonaccrual loans as a percent of total assets   0.06       0.32       0.01       0.01       0.01  
    ACL as a percent of total loans   1.42       1.29       1.30       1.28       1.29  
    Net charge-offs to average loans receivable, net   0.00       0.00       0.00       0.00       0.00  
                       
    Allowance for Credit Losses:                  
    ACL ‒ loans                  
    Beginning balance $ 14,796     $ 14,996     $ 15,306     $ 15,306     $ 15,606  
    Provision (recapture of provision) for credit losses   1,500       (200 )     (300 )     –       (300 )
    Charge-offs   (31 )     –       (10 )     –       –  
    Recoveries   –       –       –       –       –  
    Ending balance $ 16,265     $ 14,796     $ 14,996     $ 15,306     $ 15,306  
                       
    Allowance for unfunded commitments                  
    Beginning balance $ 564     $ 564     $ 439     $ 439     $ 439  
    Provision for credit losses   75       –       125       –       –  
    Ending balance $ 639     $ 564     $ 564     $ 439     $ 439  
                       
    Provision (recapture of provision) for credit losses                  
    ACL – loans $ 1,500     $ (200 )   $ (300 )   $ –     $ (300 )
    Allowance for unfunded commitments   75       –       125       –       –  
    Total $ 1,575     $ (200 )   $ (175 )   $ –     $ (300 )
     

    (1) Performance ratios are calculated on an annualized basis.
    (2) Non-GAAP financial measures. Refer to Non-GAAP Financial Measures at the end of this press release for a reconciliation to the nearest GAAP equivalents.
    (3) Capital ratios are for First Financial Northwest Bank only.
    (4) Loans are reported net of undisbursed funds.

    FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    Key Financial Measures
    (Unaudited)
     
      At or For the Quarter Ended
      Sep 30,   Jun 30,   Mar 31,   Dec 31,   Sep 30,
        2024       2024       2024       2023       2023  
      (Dollars in thousands)
    Yields and Costs: (1)                  
    Yield on loans   5.86 %     5.93 %     5.88 %     5.83 %     5.73 %
    Yield on investments   4.30       4.38       4.11       4.11       3.98  
    Yield on interest-earning deposits   5.27       5.25       5.28       5.32       5.18  
    Yield on FHLB stock   7.73       8.63       7.79       7.29       6.57  
    Yield on interest-earning assets   5.66 %     5.73 %     5.62 %     5.56 %     5.46 %
                       
    Cost of interest-bearing deposits   3.80 %     3.71 %     3.69 %     3.62 %     3.33 %
    Cost of borrowings   3.19       2.64       2.65       2.40       2.42  
    Cost of interest-bearing liabilities   3.72 %     3.59 %     3.58 %     3.50 %     3.24 %
                       
    Cost of total deposits (2)   3.47 %     3.38 %     3.38 %     3.31 %     3.03 %
    Cost of funds (3)   3.44 %     3.30 %     3.31 %     3.23 %     2.97 %
                       
    Average Balances:                  
    Loans $ 1,131,473     $ 1,139,017     $ 1,160,156     $ 1,167,339     $ 1,171,483  
    Investments   161,232       173,102       202,106       206,837       211,291  
    Interest-earning deposits   65,149       36,959       37,032       65,680       40,202  
    FHLB stock   7,719       6,714       6,554       6,584       6,820  
    Total interest-earning assets $ 1,365,573     $ 1,355,792     $ 1,405,848     $ 1,446,440     $ 1,429,796  
                       
    Interest-bearing deposits $ 1,021,041     $ 1,029,608     $ 1,082,168     $ 1,127,690     $ 1,097,324  
    Borrowings   151,478       129,126       125,604       120,978       125,402  
    Total interest-bearing liabilities   1,172,519       1,158,734       1,207,772       1,248,668       1,222,726  
    Noninterest-bearing deposits   96,003       101,196       99,173       102,869       109,384  
    Total deposits and borrowings $ 1,268,522     $ 1,259,930     $ 1,306,945     $ 1,351,537     $ 1,332,110  
                       
    Average assets $ 1,453,431     $ 1,446,207     $ 1,495,753     $ 1,538,955     $ 1,522,224  
    Average stockholders’ equity   161,569       161,057       161,823       159,659       160,299  
     

    (1) Yields and costs are annualized.
    (2) Includes noninterest-bearing deposits.
    (3) Includes total borrowings and deposits (including noninterest-bearing deposits).

    Non-GAAP Financial Measures

    In addition to financial results presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) utilized in the United States, this earnings release contains non-GAAP financial measures that include tangible equity, tangible assets, tangible book value per share, and the tangible equity-to-assets ratio. The Company believes that these non-GAAP financial measures and ratios as presented are useful for both investors and management to understand the effects of goodwill and core deposit intangible, net and provides an alternative view of the Company’s performance over time and in comparison to the Company’s competitors. Non-GAAP financial measures have limitations, are not required to be uniformly applied and are not audited. They should not be considered in isolation and are not a substitute for other measures in this earnings release that are presented in accordance with GAAP. These non-GAAP measures may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies.

    The following tables provide a reconciliation between the GAAP and non-GAAP measures:

      Quarter Ended
        Sep 30,
    2024    		       Jun 30,
    2024    		       Mar 31,
    2024    		       Dec 31,
    2023    		       Sep 30,
    2023    		  
      (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
    Tangible equity to tangible assets and tangible book value per share:
                                           
    Total stockholders’ equity (GAAP) $ 160,213     $ 160,693     $ 160,183     $ 161,660     $ 159,235  
    Less:                  
    Goodwill   889       889       889       889       889  
    Core deposit intangible, net   326       357       388       419       451  
    Tangible equity (Non-GAAP) $ 158,998     $ 159,447     $ 158,906     $ 160,352     $ 157,895  
                       
    Total assets (GAAP) $ 1,451,086     $ 1,447,753     $ 1,468,350     $ 1,505,082     $ 1,525,568  
    Less:                  
    Goodwill   889       889       889       889       889  
    Core deposit intangible, net   326       357       388       419       451  
    Tangible assets (Non-GAAP) $ 1,449,871     $ 1,446,507     $ 1,467,073     $ 1,503,774     $ 1,524,228  
                       
    Common shares outstanding at period end   9,213,969       9,179,825       9,174,425       9,179,510       9,179,510  
                       
    Equity-to-assets ratio (GAAP)   11.04 %     11.10 %     10.91 %     10.74 %     10.44 %
    Tangible equity-to-tangible assets ratio (Non-GAAP)   10.97       11.02       10.83       10.66       10.36  
    Book value per common share (GAAP) $ 17.39     $ 17.51     $ 17.46     $ 17.61     $ 17.35  
    Tangible book value per share (Non-GAAP)   17.26       17.37       17.32       17.47       17.20  

    The MIL Network –

  • MIL-OSI: First Northwest Bancorp Reports Third Quarter 2024 Financial Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    PORT ANGELES, Wash., Oct. 29, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) —

    CEO Commentary
    “This was a quarter of mixed results. Progress on customer deposit gathering and the termination of the FDIC Consent Order was overshadowed by a quarterly loss driven by additional provisions primarily related to certain equity loans made to high net worth, accredited investors.

    The teamwork and collaboration between Staff, Management and the Board to address the matters identified in the Consent Order is demonstrative of the qualifications, determination and capabilities of the First Fed team. We appreciate that the FDIC acknowledged the planning, monitoring and execution required to comply with the Order and validation that all of these matters were properly addressed. I am very proud of this accomplishment, and I would like to thank all of the many people within the bank who worked tirelessly to reach this achievement less than one year after the Order was issued.

    Through an internal review of our loan portfolio and with consultation with our prudential regulators, it was determined that larger provisions were required in the second quarter of 2024. As a result, we decided it was appropriate to file a restated quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2024, and identified a material weakness in the design of certain internal controls. The loans for which we increased reserves were originated between 2020 and 2023. More recent vintages of our loan portfolio are performing well as we have engaged in lending and partnerships that we have evaluated as having a relatively lower risk profile. The provision for credit losses after the amendment was $8.7 million in the second quarter of 2024.

    Management and the Board of Directors take the reported material weakness very seriously. We have taken corrective action to address the basis for the restatement and are working to promptly remediate. 

    We also acknowledge the ongoing lawsuits filed by some of the Water Station equipment borrowers. We intend to vigorously defend against these claims, which we believe are meritless. We also intend to continue pursuing collection of all monies owed by the litigants using all available legal means.

    Moving forward, the highly capable bankers at First Fed are focused on continuing to build relationships with small businesses and individuals in the communities we serve. We continue to pursue inroads in SBA, treasury, maritime lending, first and second mortgage lending and community banking. We are introducing products and services to meet our customers where they are and to enhance their overall experience with First Fed. We believe that focusing on these fundamentals of Community Banking will improve our results and our overall franchise value.”

    — Matthew P. Deines, President and CEO, First Northwest Bancorp

    2024 FINANCIAL RESULTS   3Q 24     2Q 24     3Q 23     2024 YTD     2023 YTD  
    OPERATING RESULTS (in millions)                                        
    Net (loss) income   $ (2.0 )   $ (2.2 )   $ 2.5     $ (3.8 )   $ 7.8  
    Pre-provision net interest income     14.0       14.2       15.0       42.2       47.2  
    Provision for credit losses     3.1       8.7       0.4       12.8       0.2  
    Noninterest expense     15.8       15.6       14.4       45.8       44.5  
    Total revenue, net of interest expense *     15.8       21.6       17.9       53.5       54.2  
    PER SHARE DATA                                        
    Basic and diluted (loss) earnings   $ (0.23 )   $ (0.25 )   $ 0.28     $ (0.43 )   $ 0.87  
    Book value     17.17       16.81       16.20       17.17       16.20  
    Tangible book value *     17.00       16.64       16.03       17.00       16.03  
    BALANCE SHEET (in millions)                                        
    Total assets   $ 2,255     $ 2,216     $ 2,154     $ 2,255     $ 2,154  
    Total loans     1,735       1,698       1,635       1,735       1,635  
    Total deposits     1,712       1,708       1,658       1,712       1,658  
    Total shareholders’ equity     161       159       156       161       156  
    ASSET QUALITY                                        
    Net charge-off ratio(1)     0.10 %     1.70 %     0.30 %     0.67 %     0.10 %
    Nonperforming assets to total assets     1.35       1.07       0.11       1.35       0.11  
    Allowance for credit losses on loans                                        
    to total loans     1.27       1.14       1.04       1.27       1.04  
    Nonaccrual loan coverage ratio     72       82       714       72       714  
    (1)  Performance ratios are annualized, where appropriate.
    *See reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures later in this release.
                                             
    2024 FINANCIAL RESULTS (Continued)   3Q 24     2Q 24     3Q 23     2024 YTD     2023 YTD  
    SELECTED RATIOS                                        
    Return on average assets(1)     -0.36 %     -0.40 %     0.46 %     -0.23 %     0.50 %
    Return on average equity(1)     -4.91       -5.47       6.17       -3.14       6.50  
    Return on average tangible common equity(1) *     -4.96       -5.53       6.23       -3.17       6.57  
    Net interest margin     2.70       2.76       2.97       2.74       3.22  
    Efficiency ratio     100.31       72.32       80.52       85.54       82.06  
    Bank common equity tier 1 (CETI) ratio     12.20       12.40       13.43       12.20       13.43  
    Bank total risk-based capital ratio     13.44       13.49       14.38       13.44       14.38  
    (1)  Performance ratios are annualized, where appropriate.
    *See reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures later in this release.
                                             
      2024 Significant Items as of September 30, 2024
    • Year-to-date net loss of $3.8 million was primarily due to a provision for credit losses of $12.8 million as the collectability of a small number of loan relationships continued to deteriorate and additional reserves were taken on purchased loan pools.
    • First Fed Bank (“First Fed” or the “Bank”) balance sheet restructuring contributed to an improved year-to-date yield on earning assets by 16-basis points over the prior year end to 5.44%.
      –  Sale-leaseback transaction completed in the second quarter, resulting in a $7.9 million gain on sale of premises and equipment.
      –  Sold $23.2 million of lower-yielding security investments which resulted in $2.1 million year-to-date loss on sale.
      –  Purchased $53.3 million of higher-yielding security investments year-to-date.
      –  Continued conversion of lower-yielding bank-owned life insurance (“BOLI”) with one conversion completed in the first quarter and an exchange in the third quarter. Two additional policy restructures expected to be completed by the end of the first quarter of 2025.
    • Net interest margin decreased over the prior year end from 3.13% to 2.74%, impacted by the increase in deposit and borrowing costs outpacing increased yields on loans and investments.
    • Loan mix shifted away from construction and commercial real estate into commercial business, auto, multi-family real estate, one-to-four family and home equity compared to the prior year end. The weighted-average rate on new loans year-to-date was 8.5%.
    • Borrowings increased $14.1 million, or 4.4%, to $335.0 million at September 30, 2024, compared to $320.9 million at December 31, 2023.
    • Repurchased 214,132 shares during the first quarter, which closed out the October 2020 Stock Repurchase Plan.
    • Repurchased 98,156 shares during the third quarter under the new share repurchase plan approved in April 2024. 
    • Year-to-date deposit growth of $34.7 million, or 2.0%, to $1.71 billion, with a $30.0 million shift from savings to money market accounts. Cost of total deposits increased over the prior year end from 1.66% to 2.49%.
    • Estimated insured deposits totaled $1.3 billion, or 77% of total deposits at September 30, 2024. Available liquidity to uninsured deposit coverage remained strong at 142% at September 30, 2024.
    • Classified loans increased to 2.71% of total loans at September 30, 2024, compared to 2.12% at December 31, 2023.
    • Nonperforming assets increased $11.7 million year-to-date mainly due to three commercial loan relationships included in commercial construction, commercial real estate and commercial business.
    • Completed a reduction-in-force impacting 9% of our workforce on July 24, 2024. This action, along with year-to-date headcount management through attrition, is expected to result in a reduction in current levels of compensation expense by approximately $820,000 per quarter starting in the fourth quarter of 2024.
       

    First Northwest Bancorp (Nasdaq: FNWB) (“First Northwest” or the “Company”) today reported a net loss of $2.0 million for the third quarter of 2024, compared to a net loss of $2.2 million for the second quarter of 2024 and net income of $2.5 million for the third quarter of 2023. Basic and diluted loss per share were $0.23 for the third quarter of 2024, compared to basic and diluted loss per share of $0.25 for the second quarter of 2024 and basic and diluted earnings per share of $0.28 for the third quarter of 2023. In the third quarter of 2024, the Company generated a return on average assets of -0.36%, a return on average equity of -4.91% and a return on average tangible common equity* of -4.96%. Loss before provision for income taxes was $3.2 million for the third quarter of 2024, compared to a loss before provision for income taxes of $2.8 million for the preceding quarter, a decrease of $417,000, or 15.1%, and decreased $6.3 million compared to income of $3.1 million for the third quarter of 2023.

    The Bank recorded reserves on individually analyzed loans totaling $1.9 million due to the uncertain future cash flows from specific loan relationships in the third quarter of 2024. An additional credit loss on loans of $1.8 million was attributable to an increase in the reserve on pooled commercial business loans, with a reserve loss rate of 3.4% applied to that segment of the loan portfolio at period end. We believe the reserve on individually analyzed loans does not represent a universal decline in the collectability of all loans in the portfolio. We continue to work on resolution plans for all troubled borrowers. The provision for credit losses on loans had a significant negative impact on net income and was the only reason for the net loss recorded for the third quarter of 2024.

    Steps taken to restructure the Bank’s balance sheet continue to have a positive impact. The fair value hedge on loans, tied to the compounded overnight index swap using the secured overnight financing rate index, established in the first quarter of 2024 added $946,000 to interest income year-to-date. The fair value hedge on loans reduces interest rate risk by reducing liability sensitivity while increasing interest income. We estimate that if rates remain unchanged, this hedge will add $1.3 million of annualized interest income in 2024. The estimated impact will be reduced if the Federal Reserve Board (“FRB”) implements additional rate cuts during the year. The Bank expects to maintain a positive carry on its derivative for up to 75-basis points of additional rate cuts.

    The balance sheet restructure plan also includes the conversion of BOLI policies in order to reinvest in higher yielding products. The first $6.1 million policy earning 2.58% was surrendered during the first quarter and reinvested into a policy earning 5.18%. In the third quarter of 2024, a $1.3 million policy earning 3.18% was exchanged and reinvested into a policy earning 5.73%. The remaining surrender and exchange transactions are expected to be completed by the end of the first quarter of 2025.

    Net Interest Income
    Total interest income decreased $405,000 to $28.2 million for the third quarter of 2024, compared to $28.6 million in the previous quarter, and increased $2.4 million compared to $25.8 million in the third quarter of 2023. Interest income decreased in the third quarter of 2024 primarily due to interest reversals for loans placed on nonaccrual totaling $619,000. The interest adjustments were partially offset by higher yields on performing loans combined with increased loan volume. Interest and fees on loans increased year-over-year as the loan portfolio grew as a result of draws on new and existing lines of credit, originations of commercial real estate, commercial business and home equity loans, and auto and manufactured home loan purchases. Loan yields increased over the prior year due to higher rates on new originations as well as the repricing of variable and adjustable-rate loans tied to the Prime Rate or other indices.

    Total interest expense decreased $190,000 to $14.2 million for the third quarter of 2024, compared to $14.4 million in the second quarter of 2024, and increased $3.3 million compared to $10.9 million in the third quarter of 2023. Interest expense for the three months ended September 30, 2024, was lower primarily due to lower rates on advances combined with decreased advance volumes. The decrease was partially offset by a 9-basis point increase in the cost of deposits to 2.56% for the quarter ended September 30, 2024, from 2.47% for the prior quarter as a result of customers continuing to shift deposit balances into higher earning products. The increase over the third quarter of 2023 was the result of a 71-basis point increase in the cost of deposits from 1.85% in the third quarter one year ago. A shift in the deposit mix from transaction and savings accounts to money market accounts and time deposits also added to the higher cost of deposits compared to the third quarter of 2023. Higher costs of brokered time deposits also contributed to additional deposit costs with a 57-basis point increase to 4.88% for the current quarter compared to 4.31% for the third quarter one year ago.

    Net interest income before provision for credit losses for the third quarter of 2024 decreased $215,000, or 1.5%, to $14.0 million, compared to $14.2 million for the preceding quarter, and decreased $930,000, or 6.2%, from the third quarter one year ago. The impact of the September FRB rate cut will be reflected beginning with fourth quarter 2024 interest income and expenses.

    The Company recorded a $3.1 million provision for credit losses on loans in the third quarter of 2024, primarily due to reserves taken individually analyzed loans and Current Expected Credit Loss model loss factor increases attributable to pooled commercial business and multi-family loans at quarter end. Credit loss provision increases were offset by decreases to the loss factors applied to consumer, commercial real estate and one-to-four family loans. Higher loss factors applied to unfunded commitments and a moderate increase in commitment balances also resulted in a provision for credit losses on unfunded commitments of $57,000 for the quarter. The total provision for credit loss recorded for the third quarter of 2024 was $3.1 million, compared to a credit loss provision of $8.7 million for the preceding quarter and a provision of $371,000 for the third quarter of 2023.

    The net interest margin decreased to 2.70% for the third quarter of 2024, from 2.76% for the prior quarter, and decreased 27-basis points from 2.97% for the third quarter of 2023. The decrease over the linked quarter is primarily due to the accrued interest reversed on three nonperforming commercial loans during the three months ended September 30, 2024, partially offset by an increase in interest income earned on a higher volume of loans. Investment securities also had decreased volume due to regular payments and lower yields due to variable-rate securities compared to the preceding quarter. The Company reported reduced rates and declining volume of borrowings during the quarter which lowered costs; however, these savings were partially offset by an increase in cost due to a higher volume of retail customer deposits. The decrease in net interest margin from the same quarter one year ago is due to higher funding costs for deposits and borrowed funds. Organic loan production comprised 73% of new loan commitments for the third quarter with the remaining 27% added through purchases of higher-yielding loans from established third-party relationships. The Bank’s fair value hedging agreements on securities and loans added $188,000 and $395,000, respectively, to interest income for the third quarter of 2024.

    The yield on average earning assets for the third quarter of 2024 decreased 11-basis points to 5.44% compared to 5.55% for the second quarter of 2024 and increased 30-basis points from 5.14% for the third quarter of 2023. The third quarter decrease is attributable to the accrued interest reversed on nonperforming loans, a lower yield and volume of investment securities and a decrease in the balance of Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) stock. The year-over-year increase in interest income was primarily due to higher average loan balances augmented by increases in yields on all earning assets, which were positively impacted by the higher rate environment.

    The cost of average interest-bearing liabilities decreased 5-basis points to 3.23% for the third quarter of 2024, compared to 3.28% for the second quarter of 2024, and increased 63-basis points from 2.60% for the third quarter of 2023. Total cost of funds decreased to 2.82% for the third quarter of 2024 from 2.87% in the prior quarter and increased from 2.23% for the third quarter of 2023. Current quarter decreases were due to lower average balances and costs on borrowings. The Bank continues to offer higher rate specials on money market and CD accounts to attract and retain retail customer deposits. The average brokered CD balance decreased $5.5 million from the linked quarter with a 6-basis point decrease in the average rate paid on brokered funds.

    The increase in cost of average interest-bearing liabilities over the same quarter last year was driven by higher rates paid on deposits and borrowings and higher average CD balances. The Company attracted and retained funding through the use of promotional products and a focus on digital account acquisition. The mix of retail deposit balances shifted from no or low-cost transaction and savings accounts towards higher cost term certificate and higher yield money market accounts. Retail CDs represented 29.3%, 26.8% and 27.6% of retail deposits at September 30, 2024, June 30, 2024 and September 30, 2023, respectively. Average interest-bearing deposit balances increased $44.8 million, or 3.2%, to $1.45 billion for the third quarter of 2024 compared to the second quarter of 2024 and increased $75.0 million, or 5.4%, compared to $1.38 billion for the third quarter of 2023.

    Selected Yields   3Q 24     2Q 24     1Q 24     4Q 23     3Q 23  
    Loan yield     5.51 %     5.62 %     5.51 %     5.38 %     5.31 %
    Investment securities yield     4.90       5.01       4.75       4.53       4.18  
    Cost of interest-bearing deposits     3.00       2.91       2.86       2.52       2.22  
    Cost of total deposits     2.56       2.47       2.43       2.12       1.85  
    Cost of borrowed funds     4.35       4.76       4.52       4.50       4.45  
    Net interest spread     2.21       2.27       2.28       2.40       2.54  
    Net interest margin     2.70       2.76       2.76       2.84       2.97  
                                             

    Noninterest Income
    Noninterest income decreased to $1.8 million for the third quarter of 2024 compared to $7.4 million for the second quarter of 2024. Nonrecurring second quarter transactions included a sale-leaseback transaction which resulted in a gain on sale of premises and equipment of $7.9 million, partially offset by a $2.1 million loss on the sale of lower-yielding available-for-sale securities. Income from the gain on sale of loans in the third quarter of 2024 includes $51,000 from SBA loans, compared to $116,000 in the prior quarter. Write-downs on sold loan servicing rights mark-to-market valuation totaled $161,000 for the third quarter of 2024 compared to $103,000 in the prior quarter. Other noninterest income includes a valuation gain on partnership investments of $279,000 compared to a loss of $56,000 in the preceding quarter.

    Noninterest income decreased 38.7% from $2.9 million in the same quarter one year ago. The third quarter of 2023 included $750,000 in credit enhancements reimbursed to the Company on Splash charge-offs recorded in other noninterest income. The quarter ended September 30, 2023, also included a $102,000 gain on sale of mortgage loans, compared to a $6,000 gain in the third quarter of 2024.

    Noninterest Income                                        
    $ in thousands   3Q 24     2Q 24     1Q 24     4Q 23     3Q 23  
    Loan and deposit service fees   $ 1,059     $ 1,076     $ 1,102       1,068     $ 1,068  
    Sold loan servicing fees and servicing rights mark-to-market     10       74       219       276       98  
    Net gain on sale of loans     58       150       52       33       171  
    Net (loss) gain on sale of investment securities     —       (2,117 )     —       (5,397 )     —  
    Net gain on sale of premises and equipment     —       7,919       —       —       —  
    Increase in cash surrender value of bank-owned life insurance     315       293       243       260       252  
    Other income     337       (48 )     572       831       1,315  
    Total noninterest income   $ 1,779     $ 7,347     $ 2,188     $ (2,929 )   $ 2,904  
                                             

    Noninterest Expense
    Noninterest expense totaled $15.9 million for the third quarter of 2024, compared to $15.6 million for the preceding quarter and $14.4 million for the third quarter a year ago. Increases were primarily due to one-time severance payouts of $704,000 during the three months ended September 30, 2024, partially offset by a decrease in occupancy due to the one-time tax assessment on the sale-leaseback of $359,000 paid in the previous quarter. Other expense increased this quarter primarily due to $161,000 of additional credit related expenses.

    The increase in total noninterest expenses compared to the third quarter of 2023 is mainly due to current quarter one-time severance payouts of $704,000, additional payroll tax expense of $342,000 and additional medical benefit expense of $162,000. Payroll tax expense in the third quarter of 2023 included accretion of the employee retention credit (“ERC”) which reduced the expense by $293,000. In the fourth quarter of 2023, the Bank stopped the recognition of the ERC for the foreseeable future. Occupancy increased due to the additional rent of $416,000 from the previous quarter sale-leaseback transaction. Other increases compared to the third quarter of 2023 included $51,000 in stockholder communications, $103,000 of state taxes, $163,000 in FDIC insurance premiums, and $269,000 of additional credit related expenses. These increases were partially offset by lower legal fees of $204,000, consulting fees of $146,000 and advertising costs of $91,000. The Company continues to focus on controlling compensation expense and reducing advertising and other discretionary spending to improve earnings.

    Noninterest Expense                                        
    $ in thousands   3Q 24     2Q 24     1Q 24     4Q 23     3Q 23  
    Compensation and benefits   $ 8,582     $ 8,588     $ 8,128     $ 7,397     $ 7,795  
    Data processing     2,085       2,008       1,944       2,107       1,945  
    Occupancy and equipment     1,553       1,799       1,240       1,262       1,173  
    Supplies, postage, and telephone     360       317       293       351       292  
    Regulatory assessments and state taxes     548       457       513       376       446  
    Advertising     409       377       309       235       501  
    Professional fees     698       684       910       1,119       929  
    FDIC insurance premium     533       473       386       418       369  
    Other expense     1,080       906       580       3,725       926  
    Total noninterest expense   $ 15,848     $ 15,609     $ 14,303     $ 16,990     $ 14,376  
                                             
    Efficiency ratio     100.31 %     72.32 %     88.75 %     150.81 %     80.52 %
                                             

    Investment Securities
    Investment securities increased $4.2 million, or 1.4%, to $310.9 million at September 30, 2024, compared to $306.7 million three months earlier, and increased $1.5 million compared to $309.3 million at September 30, 2023. The market value of the portfolio increased $8.1 million during the third quarter of 2024 primarily due to the market rally in the second half the third quarter which drove the yield curve lower. At September 30, 2024, municipal bonds totaled $81.4 million and comprised the largest portion of the investment portfolio at 26.2%. Agency issued mortgage-backed securities (“MBS agency”) were the second largest segment, totaling $78.5 million, or 25.3%, of the portfolio at quarter end. Included in MBS non-agency were $29.6 million of commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”), of which 89.8% were in “A” tranches and the remaining 10.2% were in “B” tranches. Our largest exposure in the CMBS portfolio at September 30, 2024, was to long-term care facilities, which comprised 65.0%, or $19.2 million, of our private label CMBS securities. All of the CMBS bonds had credit enhancements ranging from 28.8% to 71.8%, with a weighted-average credit enhancement of 55.3%, that further reduced the risk of loss on these investments.

    The estimated average life of the securities portfolio was approximately 7.4 years at September 30, 2024, 7.8 years at the prior quarter end and 7.7 years for the third quarter of 2023. The effective duration of the portfolio was approximately 3.9 years at September 30, 2024, compared to 4.3 years in the prior quarter and 4.9 years at the end of the third quarter of 2023. Our recent investment purchases have primarily been floating rate securities to take advantage of higher short-term rates above those offered on cash and to reduce our liability sensitivity.

    Investment Securities Available for Sale, at Fair Value                                        
    $ in thousands   3Q 24     2Q 24     1Q 24     4Q 23     3Q 23  
    Municipal bonds   $ 81,363     $ 78,825     $ 87,004     $ 87,761     $ 93,995  
    U.S. Treasury notes     —       —       —       —       2,377  
    International agency issued bonds (Agency bonds)     —       —       —       —       1,703  
    U.S. government agency issued asset-backed securities (ABS agency)     13,296       13,982       14,822       11,782       —  
    Corporate issued asset-backed securities (ABS corporate)     16,391       16,483       13,929       5,286       —  
    Corporate issued debt securities (Corporate debt):                                        
    Senior positions     10,241       9,066       13,617       9,270       16,975  
    Subordinated bank notes     43,817       43,826       39,414       42,184       37,360  
    U.S. Small Business Administration securities (SBA)     9,317       9,772       7,911       —       —  
    Mortgage-backed securities:                                        
    U.S. government agency issued mortgage-backed securities (MBS agency)     78,549       77,301       83,271       63,247       66,946  
    Non-agency issued mortgage-backed securities (MBS non-agency)     57,886       57,459       65,987       76,093       89,968  
    Total securities available for sale, at fair value   $ 310,860     $ 306,714     $ 325,955     $ 295,623     $ 309,324  
                                             

    Loans and Unfunded Loan Commitments
    Net loans, excluding loans held for sale, increased $36.7 million, or 2.2%, to $1.71 billion at September 30, 2024, from $1.68 billion at June 30, 2024, and increased $96.4 million, or 6.0%, from $1.62 billion one year ago.

    Commercial business loans increased $38.2 million, primarily attributable to a $29.0 million increase in our Northpointe Bank Mortgage Purchase Program participation, organic originations totaling $7.9 million and draws on existing lines of credit of $5.7 million which were partially offset by payments. One-to-four family loans increased $5.9 million during the third quarter of 2024 as a result of $14.2 million in residential construction loans that converted to permanent amortizing loans, partially offset by payoffs and scheduled payments. Home equity loans increased $4.3 million over the previous quarter due to organic home equity loan production of $5.5 million and draws on new and existing commitments of $4.6 million, partially offset by payoffs and scheduled payments. Multi-family loans increased $3.7 million during the current quarter. The increase was primarily the result of $9.2 million of construction loans converting into permanent amortizing loans, partially offset by payoffs and scheduled payments. Commercial real estate loans increased $497,000 during the third quarter of 2024 compared to the previous quarter as originations of $8.6 million were offset by payoffs and scheduled payments.

    Construction loans decreased $11.6 million during the quarter, with $23.4 million converting into fully amortizing loans, partially offset by draws on new and existing loans. New single-family residence construction loan commitments totaled $4.1 million in the third quarter, compared to $2.7 million in the preceding quarter. Auto and other consumer loans decreased $4.4 million during the third quarter of 2024 as payoffs and scheduled payments were higher than $5.8 million of new auto loan purchases, a $4.3 million manufactured home loan pool and individual manufactured home loan purchases totaling $1.2 million. 

    The Company originated $3.4 million in residential mortgages during the third quarter of 2023 and sold $3.9 million, with an average gross margin on sale of mortgage loans of approximately 2.06%. This production compares to residential mortgage originations of $5.0 million in the preceding quarter with sales of $4.9 million, and an average gross margin of 2.05%. Single-family home inventory remained historically low and higher market rates on mortgage loans continued to limit saleable mortgage loan production through much of the third quarter.

    Loans by Collateral and Unfunded Commitments                                        
    $ in thousands   3Q 24     2Q 24     1Q 24     4Q 23     3Q 23  
    One-to-four family construction   $ 51,607     $ 49,440     $ 70,100     $ 60,211     $ 72,991  
    All other construction and land     45,166       58,346       55,286       69,484       71,092  
    One-to-four family first mortgage     469,053       434,840       436,543       426,159       409,207  
    One-to-four family junior liens     14,701       13,706       12,608       12,250       12,859  
    One-to-four family revolving open-end     48,459       44,803       45,536       42,479       38,413  
    Commercial real estate, owner occupied:                                        
    Health care     29,407       29,678       29,946       22,523       22,677  
    Office     17,901       19,215       17,951       18,468       18,599  
    Warehouse     11,645       14,613       14,683       14,758       14,890  
    Other     64,535       56,292       55,063       61,304       57,414  
    Commercial real estate, non-owner occupied:                                        
    Office     49,770       50,158       53,099       53,548       53,879  
    Retail     49,717       50,101       50,478       51,384       51,466  
    Hospitality     62,282       62,628       66,982       67,332       61,339  
    Other     82,573       84,428       93,040       94,822       96,083  
    Multi-family residential     354,118       350,382       339,907       333,428       325,338  
    Commercial business loans     86,904       79,055       90,781       76,920       75,068  
    Commercial agriculture and fishing loans     15,369       14,411       10,200       5,422       4,437  
    State and political subdivision obligations     404       405       405       405       439  
    Consumer automobile loans     144,036       151,121       139,524       132,877       134,695  
    Consumer loans secured by other assets     132,749       129,293       122,895       108,542       104,999  
    Consumer loans unsecured     4,411       5,209       6,415       7,712       9,093  
    Total loans   $ 1,734,807     $ 1,698,124     $ 1,711,442     $ 1,660,028     $ 1,634,978  
                                             
    Unfunded commitments under lines of credit or existing loans   $ 166,446     $ 155,005     $ 148,736     $ 149,631     $ 154,722  
                                             

    Deposits
    Total deposits increased $3.4 million to $1.71 billion at September 30, 2024, compared to $1.71 billion at June 30, 2024, and increased $53.9 million, or 3.3%, compared to $1.66 billion one year ago. During the third quarter of 2024, total retail customer deposit balances increased $23.4 million and brokered deposit balances decreased $20.0 million. Compared to the preceding quarter, there were balance increases of $18.1 million in consumer time deposits, $17.7 million in business money market accounts, $7.9 million in consumer demand accounts and $7.7 million in business time deposits. These increases were partially offset by decreases in business demand accounts of $26.4 million, brokered time deposits of $20.0 million, consumer money market accounts of $7.4 million, business savings accounts of $6.5 million, consumer savings accounts of $5.3 million and public fund time deposits of $941,000, during the third quarter of 2024. Increases in time deposits and money market accounts were driven by customer behavior as they sought out higher rates. Overall, the current rate environment continues to contribute to greater competition for deposits with ongoing deposit rate specials offered to attract new funds.

    The Company estimates that $401.0 million, or 23%, of total deposit balances were uninsured at September 30, 2024. Approximately $265.7 million, or 16%, of total deposits were uninsured business and consumer deposits with the remaining $135.3 million, or 8%, consisting of uninsured public funds at September 30, 2024. Uninsured public fund balances were fully collateralized. The Bank holds an FHLB standby letter of credit as part of our participation in the Washington Public Deposit Protection Commission program which covered $115.5 million of related deposit balances while the remaining $19.8 million of uninsured tribal accounts was fully covered through pledged securities at September 30, 2024.

    As of September 30, 2024, consumer deposits made up 58% of total deposits with an average balance of $24,000 per account, business deposits made up 22% of total deposits with an average balance of $51,000 per account, public fund deposits made up 8% of total deposits with an average balance of $1.6 million per account and the remaining 12% of account balances are brokered time deposits. We have maintained the majority of our public fund relationships for over 10 years. Approximately 70% of our customer base is located in rural areas, with 18% in urban areas and the remaining 12% are brokered deposits as of September 30, 2024.

    Deposits                                        
    $ in thousands   3Q 24     2Q 24     1Q 24     4Q 23     3Q 23  
    Noninterest-bearing demand deposits   $ 252,999     $ 276,543     $ 252,083     $ 269,800     $ 280,475  
    Interest-bearing demand deposits     167,202       162,201       169,418       182,361       179,029  
    Money market accounts     433,307       423,047       362,205       372,706       374,269  
    Savings accounts     212,763       224,631       242,148       253,182       260,279  
    Certificates of deposit, retail     441,665       398,161       443,412       410,136       379,484  
    Total retail deposits     1,507,936       1,484,583       1,469,266       1,488,185       1,473,536  
    Certificates of deposit, brokered     203,705       223,705       207,626       169,577       179,586  
    Total deposits   $ 1,711,641     $ 1,708,288     $ 1,676,892     $ 1,657,762     $ 1,653,122  
                                             
    Public fund and tribal deposits included in total deposits   $ 139,729     $ 138,439     $ 132,652     $ 128,627     $ 130,974  
    Total loans to total deposits     101 %     99 %     102 %     100 %     99 %
                                             
    Deposit Mix   3Q 24     2Q 24     1Q 24     4Q 23     3Q 23  
    Noninterest-bearing demand deposits     14.8 %     16.2 %     15.0 %     16.3 %     17.0 %
    Interest-bearing demand deposits     9.8       9.5       10.1       11.0       10.8  
    Money market accounts     25.3       24.8       21.6       22.5       22.6  
    Savings accounts     12.4       13.1       14.4       15.3       15.7  
    Certificates of deposit, retail     25.8       23.3       26.5       24.7       23.0  
    Certificates of deposit, brokered     11.9       13.1       12.4       10.2       10.9  
                                             
    Cost of Deposits for the Quarter Ended   3Q 24     2Q 24     1Q 24     4Q 23     3Q 23  
    Interest-bearing demand deposits     0.45 %     0.47 %     0.45 %     0.45 %     0.46 %
    Money market accounts     2.65       2.40       2.08       1.48       1.22  
    Savings accounts     1.64       1.62       1.63       1.54       1.42  
    Certificates of deposit, retail     4.16       4.10       4.13       3.92       3.52  
    Certificates of deposit, brokered     4.88       4.94       4.94       4.72       4.31  
    Cost of total deposits     2.56       2.47       2.43       2.12       1.85  
                                             

    Asset Quality
    The allowance for credit losses on loans (“ACLL”) increased $2.6 million from $19.3 million at June 30, 2024, to $22.0 million at September 30, 2024. The ACLL as a percentage of total loans was 1.27% at September 30, 2024, increasing from 1.14% at June 30, 2024, and increasing from 1.04% one year earlier. The current quarter increase can be attributed to $1.9 million of additional reserves taken on individually evaluated commercial business loans due uncertainty in the collectability of these loans. The pooled loan reserve increased $1.2 million due to higher loss factors applied to commercial business and multi-family loans, partially offset by lower loss factors applied to one-to-four family, commercial real estate, home equity, auto and other consumer loans. Loss factors were revised based on the results of an annual loss driver analysis, in conjunction with other relevant factors, to update each segment’s sensitivity to qualitative factors used in the calculation of the pooled reserve at September 30, 2024.

    Nonperforming loans totaled $30.4 million at September 30, 2024, an increase of $6.8 million from June 30, 2024, primarily attributable to a $5.6 million delinquent commercial real estate relationship and two commercial business loans with an aggregate total of $1.7 million placed on nonaccrual due to credit concerns. The percentage of the allowance for credit losses on loans to nonperforming loans decreased to 72% at September 30, 2024, from 82% at June 30, 2024, and from 714% at September 30, 2023. This ratio continues to decline as higher balances of real estate loans are included in nonperforming assets with no significant corresponding increase to the ACLL as these secured loans are considered adequately reserved for based on information currently available.

    Classified loans increased $7.2 million to $46.9 million at September 30, 2024, due to the downgrade of one $6.4 million commercial real estate loan and ten commercial business loans totaling $5.6 million during the third quarter, partially offset by loan payoffs totaling $5.0 million. An $11.2 million construction loan relationship, which became a classified loan in the fourth quarter of 2022; an $8.1 million commercial construction loan relationship, which became classified in the previous quarter; and a $6.2 million commercial loan relationship, which became classified in the fourth quarter of 2023, account for 55% of the classified loan balance at September 30, 2024. The Bank has exercised legal remedies, including the appointment of a third-party receiver and foreclosure actions, to liquidate the underlying collateral to satisfy the real estate loans in two of these three collateral dependent relationships. The Bank is also closely monitoring certain equity program loans, with 14 loans totaling $5.9 million included in classified loans at September 30, 2024, and an additional nine loans totaling $3.1 million included in the special mention risk grading category.

    $ in thousands   3Q 24     2Q 24     1Q 24     4Q 23     3Q 23  
    Allowance for credit losses on loans to total loans     1.27 %     1.14 %     1.05 %     1.05 %     1.04 %
    Allowance for credit losses on loans to nonaccrual loans     72       82       92       94       714  
    Nonaccrual loans to total loans     1.75       1.39       1.14       1.12       0.15  
    Net charge-off ratio (annualized)     0.10       1.70       0.19       0.14       0.30  
                                             
    Total nonaccrual loans   $ 30,376     $ 23,631     $ 19,481     $ 18,644     $ 2,374  
    Reserve for unfunded commitments   $ 704     $ 647     $ 548     $ 817     $ 828  
                                             

    Capital
    Total shareholders’ equity increased to $160.8 million at September 30, 2024, compared to $158.9 million three months earlier, due to an increase in the after-tax fair market values of the available-for-sale investment securities portfolio of $6.3 million, partially offset by a net loss of $2.0 million, a decrease in the after-tax fair market values of derivatives of $1.2 million, share repurchases totaling $1.0 million and dividends declared of $659,000.

    Book value per common share was $17.17 at September 30, 2024, compared to $16.81 at June 30, 2024, and $16.20 at September 30, 2023. Tangible book value per common share* was $17.00 at September 30, 2024, compared to $16.64 at June 30, 2024, and $16.03 at September 30, 2023.

    Capital levels for both the Company and its operating bank, First Fed, remain in excess of applicable regulatory requirements and the Bank was categorized as “well-capitalized” at September 30, 2024. Common Equity Tier 1 and Total Risk-Based Capital Ratios at September 30, 2024, were 12.2% and 13.4%, respectively.

        3Q 24     2Q 24     1Q 24     4Q 23     3Q 23  
    Equity to total assets     7.13 %     7.17 %     7.17 %     7.42 %     7.25 %
    Tangible common equity to tangible assets *     7.06       7.10       7.10       7.35       7.17  
    Capital ratios (First Fed Bank):                                        
    Tier 1 leverage     9.39       9.38       9.74       9.90       10.12  
    Common equity Tier 1 capital     12.20       12.40       12.56       13.12       13.43  
    Tier 1 risk-based     12.20       12.40       12.56       13.12       13.43  
    Total risk-based     13.44       13.49       13.57       14.11       14.38  
                                             

    Share Repurchase Program and Cash Dividend
    First Northwest continued to return capital to our shareholders through cash dividends and share repurchases during the third quarter of 2024. We repurchased 98,156 shares of common stock under the Company’s April 2024 Stock Repurchase Plan (“Repurchase Plan”) at an average price of $10.19 per share for a total of $1.0 million during the quarter ended September 30, 2024, leaving 846,123 shares remaining under the plan. In addition, the Company paid cash dividends totaling $652,000 in the third quarter of 2024.

    ____________________
    *     See reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures later in this release.

    Awards/Recognition
    The Company received several accolades as a leader in the community in the last year.

    In September 2024, the First Fed team was recognized in the 2024 Best of Olympic Peninsula surveys, winning Best Bank and Best Lender in Clallam County; Best Bank and Best Financial Advisor in the West End; and Best Lender in Jefferson County. First Fed was also a finalist for Best Bank, Best Customer Service, Best Employer and Best Financial Advisor in Jefferson County; Best Customer Service, Best Employer and Best Financial Advisor in Clallam County; and Best Customer Service and Best Employer in the West End.
    In May 2024, First Fed, along with the First Fed Community Foundation, were honored to be ranked second on the Puget Sound Business Journal Midsize Corporate Philanthropists list.
    In October 2023, the First Fed team was honored to bring home the Gold for Best Bank in the Best of the Northwest survey hosted by Bellingham Alive for the second year in a row.
    In September 2023, the First Fed team was recognized in the 2023 Best of Olympic Peninsula surveys as a finalist for Best Employer in Kitsap County and Best Bank and Best Financial Institution in Bainbridge.
       

    About the Company
    First Northwest Bancorp (Nasdaq: FNWB) is a financial holding company engaged in investment activities including the business of its subsidiary, First Fed Bank. First Fed is a Pacific Northwest-based financial institution which has served its customers and communities since 1923. Currently First Fed has 16 locations in Washington state including 12 full-service branches. First Fed’s business and operating strategy is focused on building sustainable earnings by delivering a full array of financial products and services for individuals, small businesses, non-profit organizations and commercial customers. In 2022, First Northwest made an investment in The Meriwether Group, LLC, a boutique investment banking and accelerator firm. Additionally, First Northwest focuses on strategic partnerships to provide modern financial services such as digital payments and marketplace lending. First Northwest Bancorp was incorporated in 2012 and completed its initial public offering in 2015 under the ticker symbol FNWB. The Company is headquartered in Port Angeles, Washington.

    Forward-Looking Statements
    Certain matters discussed in this press release may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements relate to, among other things, expectations of the business environment in which we operate, projections of future performance, perceived opportunities in the market, potential future credit experience, including our ability to collect, the outcome of litigation and statements regarding our mission and vision, and include, but are not limited to, statements about our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions that are not historical facts, and other statements often identified by words such as “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” or similar expressions. These forward-looking statements are based upon current management beliefs and expectations and may, therefore, involve risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control. Our actual results, performance, or achievements may differ materially from those suggested, expressed, or implied by forward-looking statements as a result of a wide variety of factors including, but not limited to: increased competitive pressures; changes in the interest rate environment; the credit risks of lending activities; pressures on liquidity, including as a result of withdrawals of deposits or declines in the value of our investment portfolio; changes in general economic conditions and conditions within the securities markets; legislative and regulatory changes; the risk of inaccuracies in the reporting of our financial condition as a result of the material weakness in our internal controls; and other factors described in the Company’s latest Annual Report on Form 10-K under the section entitled “Risk Factors,” and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”),which are available on our website at www.ourfirstfed.com and on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

    Any of the forward-looking statements that we make in this press release and in the other public statements we make may turn out to be incorrect because of the inaccurate assumptions we might make, because of the factors illustrated above or because of other factors that we cannot foresee. Because of these and other uncertainties, our actual future results may be materially different from those expressed or implied in any forward-looking statements made by or on our behalf and the Company’s operating and stock price performance may be negatively affected. Therefore, these factors should be considered in evaluating the forward-looking statements, and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. We do not undertake and specifically disclaim any obligation to revise any forward-looking statements to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events or circumstances after the date of such statements. These risks could cause our actual results for 2024 and beyond to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements by, or on behalf of, us and could negatively affect the Company’s operations and stock price performance.

    For More Information Contact:
    Matthew P. Deines, President and Chief Executive Officer
    Geri Bullard, EVP, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer
    IRGroup@ourfirstfed.com
    360-457-0461

    FIRST NORTHWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
    CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
    (Dollars in thousands, except share data) (Unaudited)

        September 30, 2024     June 30, 2024     September 30, 2023     Three Month Change     One Year Change  
    ASSETS                                        
    Cash and due from banks   $ 17,953     $ 19,184     $ 20,609       -6.4 %     -12.9 %
    Interest-earning deposits in banks     64,769       63,995       63,277       1.2       2.4  
    Investment securities available for sale, at fair value     310,860       306,714       309,324       1.4       0.5  
    Loans held for sale     378       1,086       689       -65.2       -45.1  
    Loans receivable (net of allowance for credit losses on loans $21,970, $19,343, and $16,945)     1,714,416       1,677,764       1,618,033       2.2       6.0  
    Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) stock, at cost     14,435       13,086       12,621       10.3       14.4  
    Accrued interest receivable     8,939       9,466       8,093       -5.6       10.5  
    Premises and equipment, net     10,436       10,714       17,954       -2.6       -41.9  
    Servicing rights on sold loans, at fair value     3,584       3,740       3,729       -4.2       -3.9  
    Bank-owned life insurance, net     41,429       41,113       40,318       0.8       2.8  
    Equity and partnership investments     14,912       15,085       14,623       -1.1       2.0  
    Goodwill and other intangible assets, net     1,083       1,084       1,087       -0.1       -0.4  
    Deferred tax asset, net     10,802       12,216       16,611       -11.6       -35.0  
    Prepaid expenses and other assets     41,490       40,715       26,577       1.9       56.1  
    Total assets   $ 2,255,486     $ 2,215,962     $ 2,153,545       1.8 %     4.7 %
                                             
    LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY                                        
    Deposits   $ 1,711,641     $ 1,708,288     $ 1,657,762       0.2 %     3.3 %
    Borrowings     334,994       302,575       300,416       10.7       11.5  
    Accrued interest payable     2,153       3,143       2,276       -31.5       -5.4  
    Accrued expenses and other liabilities     43,424       41,771       34,651       4.0       25.3  
    Advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance     2,485       1,304       2,375       90.6       4.6  
    Total liabilities     2,094,697       2,057,081       1,997,480       1.8       4.9  
                                             
    Shareholders’ Equity                                        
    Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, authorized 5,000,000 shares, no shares issued or outstanding     —       —       —       n/a       n/a  
    Common stock, $0.01 par value, authorized 75,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 9,365,979 at September 30, 2024; issued and outstanding 9,453,247 at June 30, 2024; and issued and outstanding 9,630,735 at September 30, 2023     94       94       96       0.0       -2.1  
    Additional paid-in capital     93,218       93,985       95,658       -0.8       -2.6  
    Retained earnings     100,660       103,322       113,579       -2.6       -11.4  
    Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax     (26,424 )     (31,597 )     (45,850 )     16.4       42.4  
    Unearned employee stock ownership plan (ESOP) shares     (6,759 )     (6,923 )     (7,418 )     2.4       8.9  
    Total shareholders’ equity     160,789       158,881       156,065       1.2       3.0  
    Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity   $ 2,255,486     $ 2,215,962     $ 2,153,545       1.8 %     4.7 %
                                             

    FIRST NORTHWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
    (Dollars in thousands, except per share data) (Unaudited)

        Quarter Ended                  
        September 30, 2024     June 30, 2024     September 30, 2023     Three Month Change     One Year Change  
    INTEREST INCOME                                        
    Interest and fees on loans receivable   $ 23,536     $ 23,733     $ 21,728       -0.8 %     8.3 %
    Interest on investment securities     3,786       3,949       3,368       -4.1       12.4  
    Interest on deposits in banks     582       571       524       1.9       11.1  
    FHLB dividends     302       358       214       -15.6       41.1  
    Total interest income     28,206       28,611       25,834       -1.4       9.2  
    INTEREST EXPENSE                                        
    Deposits     10,960       10,180       7,699       7.7       42.4  
    Borrowings     3,226       4,196       3,185       -23.1       1.3  
    Total interest expense     14,186       14,376       10,884       -1.3       30.3  
    Net interest income     14,020       14,235       14,950       -1.5       -6.2  
    PROVISION FOR CREDIT LOSSES                                        
    Provision for credit losses on loans     3,077       8,640       880       -64.4       249.7  
    Provision for (recapture of) credit losses on unfunded commitments     57       99       (509 )     -42.4       111.2  
    Provision for credit losses     3,134       8,739       371       -64.1       744.7  
    Net interest income after provision for credit losses     10,886       5,496       14,579       98.1       -25.3  
    NONINTEREST INCOME                                        
    Loan and deposit service fees     1,059       1,076       1,068       -1.6       -0.8  
    Sold loan servicing fees and servicing rights mark-to-market     10       74       98       -86.5       -89.8  
    Net gain on sale of loans     58       150       171       -61.3       -66.1  
    Net loss on sale of investment securities     —       (2,117 )     —       100.0       n/a  
    Net gain on sale of premises and equipment     —       7,919       —       -100.0       n/a  
    Increase in cash surrender value of bank-owned life insurance     315       293       252       7.5       25.0  
    Other income     337       (48 )     1,315       802.1       -74.4  
    Total noninterest income     1,779       7,347       2,904       -75.8       -38.7  
    NONINTEREST EXPENSE                                        
    Compensation and benefits     8,582       8,588       7,795       -0.1       10.1  
    Data processing     2,085       2,008       1,945       3.8       7.2  
    Occupancy and equipment     1,553       1,799       1,173       -13.7       32.4  
    Supplies, postage, and telephone     360       317       292       13.6       23.3  
    Regulatory assessments and state taxes     548       457       446       19.9       22.9  
    Advertising     409       377       501       8.5       -18.4  
    Professional fees     698       684       929       2.0       -24.9  
    FDIC insurance premium     533       473       369       12.7       44.4  
    Other expense     1,080       906       926       19.2       16.6  
    Total noninterest expense     15,848       15,609       14,376       1.5       10.2  
    (Loss) income before (benefit) provision for income taxes     (3,183 )     (2,766 )     3,107       -15.1       -202.4  
    (Benefit) provision for income taxes     (1,203 )     (547 )     603       -119.9       -299.5  
    Net (loss) income   $ (1,980 )   $ (2,219 )   $ 2,504       10.8 %     -179.1 %
                                             
    Basic and diluted (loss) earnings per common share   $ (0.23 )   $ (0.25 )   $ 0.28       8.0 %     -182.1 %
                                             

    FIRST NORTHWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
    (Dollars in thousands, except per share data) (Unaudited)

        Nine Months Ended September 30,     Percent  
        2024     2023     Change  
    INTEREST INCOME                        
    Interest and fees on loans receivable   $ 70,036     $ 62,531       12.0 %
    Interest on investment securities     11,367       9,886       15.0  
    Interest on deposits in banks     1,798       1,545       16.4  
    FHLB dividends     942       628       50.0  
    Total interest income     84,143       74,590       12.8  
    INTEREST EXPENSE                        
    Deposits     31,252       18,261       71.1  
    Borrowings     10,708       9,092       17.8  
    Total interest expense     41,960       27,353       53.4  
    Net interest income     42,183       47,237       -10.7  
    PROVISION FOR CREDIT LOSSES                        
    Provision for credit losses on loans     12,956       1,195       984.2  
    (Recapture of) provision for credit losses on unfunded commitments     (113 )     (1,024 )     89.0  
    Provision for credit losses     12,843       171       7,410.5  
    Net interest income after provision for credit losses     29,340       47,066       -37.7  
    NONINTEREST INCOME                        
    Loan and deposit service fees     3,237       3,273       -1.1  
    Sold loan servicing fees and servicing rights mark-to-market     303       400       -24.3  
    Net gain on sale of loans     260       405       -35.8  
    Net loss on sale of investment securities     (2,117 )     —       100.0  
    Net gain on sale of premises and equipment     7,919       —       100.0  
    Increase in cash surrender value of bank-owned life insurance     851       668       27.4  
    Other income     861       2,203       -60.9  
    Total noninterest income     11,314       6,949       62.8  
    NONINTEREST EXPENSE                        
    Compensation and benefits     25,298       23,812       6.2  
    Data processing     6,037       6,063       -0.4  
    Occupancy and equipment     4,592       3,596       27.7  
    Supplies, postage, and telephone     970       1,082       -10.4  
    Regulatory assessments and state taxes     1,518       1,259       20.6  
    Advertising     1,095       2,471       -55.7  
    Professional fees     2,292       2,619       -12.5  
    FDIC insurance premium     1,392       939       48.2  
    Other     2,566       2,623       -2.2  
    Total noninterest expense     45,760       44,464       2.9  
    (Loss) income before (benefit) provision for income taxes     (5,106 )     9,551       -153.5  
    (Benefit) provision for income taxes     (1,303 )     1,903       -168.5  
    Net (loss) income     (3,803 )     7,648       -149.7  
    Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest in Quin Ventures, Inc.     —       160       -100.0  
    Net (loss) income attributable to parent   $ (3,803 )   $ 7,808       -148.7 %
                             
    Basic and diluted (loss) earnings per common share   $ (0.43 )   $ 0.87       -149.4 %
                             

    FIRST NORTHWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
    Selected Financial Ratios and Other Data
    (Dollars in thousands, except per share data) (Unaudited)

        As of or For the Quarter Ended  
        September 30, 2024     June 30, 2024     March 31, 2024     December 31, 2023     September 30, 2023  
    Performance ratios:(1)                                        
    Return on average assets     -0.36 %     -0.40 %     0.07 %     -1.03 %     0.46 %
    Return on average equity     -4.91       -5.47       0.98       -14.05       6.17  
    Average interest rate spread     2.21       2.27       2.28       2.40       2.54  
    Net interest margin(2)     2.70       2.76       2.76       2.84       2.97  
    Efficiency ratio(3)     100.3       72.3       88.8       150.8       80.5  
    Equity to total assets     7.13       7.17       7.17       7.42       7.25  
    Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities     118.0       117.6       118.3       118.2       120.0  
    Book value per common share   $ 17.17     $ 16.81     $ 17.00     $ 16.99     $ 16.20  
                                             
    Tangible performance ratios:(1)                                        
    Tangible common equity to tangible assets(4)     7.06 %     7.10 %     7.10 %     7.35 %     7.17 %
    Return on average tangible common equity(4)     -4.96       -5.53       0.99       -14.20       6.23  
    Tangible book value per common share(4)   $ 17.00     $ 16.64     $ 16.83     $ 16.83     $ 16.03  
                                             
    Asset quality ratios:                                        
    Nonperforming assets to total assets at end of period(5)     1.35 %     1.07 %     0.87 %     0.85 %     0.11 %
    Nonaccrual loans to total loans(6)     1.75       1.39       1.14       1.12       0.15  
    Allowance for credit losses on loans to nonaccrual loans(6)     72.33       81.85       92.18       93.92       713.77  
    Allowance for credit losses on loans to total loans     1.27       1.14       1.05       1.05       1.04  
    Annualized net charge-offs to average outstanding loans     0.10       1.70       0.19       0.14       0.30  
                                             
    Capital ratios (First Fed Bank):                                        
    Tier 1 leverage     9.4 %     9.4 %     9.7 %     9.9 %     10.1 %
    Common equity Tier 1 capital     12.2       12.4       12.6       13.1       13.4  
    Tier 1 risk-based     12.2       12.4       12.6       13.1       13.4  
    Total risk-based     13.4       13.5       13.6       14.1       14.4  
                                             
    Other Information:                                        
    Average total assets   $ 2,209,333     $ 2,219,370     $ 2,166,187     $ 2,127,655     $ 2,139,734  
    Average total loans     1,718,402       1,717,830       1,678,656       1,645,418       1,641,206  
    Average interest-earning assets     2,061,970       2,072,280       2,027,821       1,980,226       1,994,251  
    Average noninterest-bearing deposits     252,911       251,442       249,283       259,845       276,294  
    Average interest-bearing deposits     1,452,817       1,408,018       1,422,116       1,379,059       1,377,734  
    Average interest-bearing liabilities     1,747,649       1,762,858       1,714,474       1,675,044       1,661,996  
    Average equity     160,479       163,079       161,867       155,971       160,994  
    Average common shares — basic     8,756,765       8,783,086       8,876,236       8,928,620       8,906,526  
    Average common shares — diluted     8,756,765       8,783,086       8,907,184       8,968,828       8,934,882  
    Tangible assets(4)     2,253,914       2,214,361       2,238,446       2,200,230       2,151,849  
    Tangible common equity(4)     159,217       157,280       158,932       161,773       154,369  
    (1) Performance ratios are annualized, where appropriate.
    (2) Net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets.
    (3) Total noninterest expense as a percentage of net interest income and total other noninterest income.
    (4) See reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures later in this release.
    (5) Nonperforming assets consists of nonperforming loans (which include nonaccruing loans and accruing loans more than 90 days past due), real estate owned and repossessed assets.
    (6) Nonperforming loans consists of nonaccruing loans and accruing loans more than 90 days past due.
       

    FIRST NORTHWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
    Selected Financial Ratios and Other Data
    (Dollars in thousands, except per share data) (Unaudited)

        As of or For the Nine Months Ended September 30,  
        2024     2023  
    Performance ratios:(1)                
    Return on average assets     -0.23 %     0.50 %
    Return on average equity     -3.14       6.50  
    Average interest rate spread     2.25       2.83  
    Net interest margin(2)     2.74       3.22  
    Efficiency ratio(3)     85.54       82.06  
    Equity to total assets     7.13       7.25  
    Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities     117.9       121.0  
    Book value per common share   $ 17.17     $ 16.20  
                     
    Tangible performance ratios:(1)                
    Tangible common equity to tangible assets(4)     7.06 %     7.17 %
    Return on average tangible common equity(4)     -3.17       6.57  
    Tangible book value per common share(4)   $ 17.00     $ 16.03  
                     
    Asset quality ratios:                
    Nonperforming assets to total assets at end of period(5)     1.35 %     0.11 %
    Nonaccrual loans to total loans(6)     1.75       0.15  
    Allowance for credit losses on loans to nonaccrual loans(6)     72.33       713.77  
    Allowance for credit losses on loans to total loans     1.27       1.04  
    Annualized net charge-offs to average outstanding loans     0.67       0.10  
                     
    Capital ratios (First Fed Bank):                
    Tier 1 leverage     9.4 %     10.1 %
    Common equity Tier 1 capital     12.2       13.4  
    Tier 1 risk-based     12.2       13.4  
    Total risk-based     13.4       14.4  
                     
    Other Information:                
    Average total assets   $ 2,198,337     $ 2,102,980  
    Average total loans     1,705,088       1,698,394  
    Average interest-earning assets     2,054,052       1,959,946  
    Average noninterest-bearing deposits     251,218       284,282  
    Average interest-bearing deposits     1,427,743       1,333,696  
    Average interest-bearing liabilities     1,741,683       1,619,763  
    Average equity     161,803       160,573  
    Average common shares — basic     8,805,124       8,910,391  
    Average common shares — diluted     8,805,124       8,930,404  
    Tangible assets(4)     2,253,914       2,151,849  
    Tangible common equity(4)     159,217       154,369  
    (1) Performance ratios are annualized, where appropriate.
    (2) Net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets.
    (3) Total noninterest expense as a percentage of net interest income and total other noninterest income.
    (4) See reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures later in this release.
    (5) Nonperforming assets consists of nonperforming loans (which include nonaccruing loans and accruing loans more than 90 days past due), real estate owned and repossessed assets.
    (6) Nonperforming loans consists of nonaccruing loans and accruing loans more than 90 days past due.
       

    FIRST NORTHWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
    (Dollars in thousands) (Unaudited)

        September 30, 2024     June 30, 2024     September 30, 2023     Three Month Change     One Year Change  
        (In thousands)  
    Real Estate:                                        
    One-to-four family   $ 395,792     $ 389,934     $ 369,950     $ 5,858     $ 25,842  
    Multi-family     353,813       350,076       325,496       3,737       28,317  
    Commercial real estate     376,008       375,511       381,508       497       (5,500 )
    Construction and land     95,709       107,273       143,434       (11,564 )     (47,725 )
    Total real estate loans     1,221,322       1,222,794       1,220,388       (1,472 )     934  
    Consumer:                                        
    Home equity     76,960       72,613       64,424       4,347       12,536  
    Auto and other consumer     281,198       285,623       248,786       (4,425 )     32,412  
    Total consumer loans     358,158       358,236       313,210       (78 )     44,948  
    Commercial business     155,327       117,094       101,380       38,233       53,947  
    Total loans receivable     1,734,807       1,698,124       1,634,978       36,683       99,829  
    Less:                                        
    Derivative basis adjustment     (1,579 )     1,017       —       (2,596 )     (1,579 )
    Allowance for credit losses on loans     21,970       19,343       16,945       2,627       5,025  
    Total loans receivable, net   $ 1,714,416     $ 1,677,764     $ 1,618,033     $ 36,652     $ 96,383  
                                             

    Selected loan detail:

        September 30, 2024     June 30, 2024     September 30, 2023     Three Month Change     One Year Change  
        (In thousands)  
    Construction and land loans breakout                                        
    1-4 Family construction   $ 43,125     $ 56,514     $ 63,371     $ (13,389 )   $ (20,246 )
    Multifamily construction     29,109       43,341       54,318       (14,232 )     (25,209 )
    Nonresidential construction     17,500       1,015       18,746       16,485       (1,246 )
    Land and development     5,975       6,403       6,999       (428 )     (1,024 )
    Total construction and land loans   $ 95,709     $ 107,273     $ 143,434     $ (11,564 )   $ (47,725 )
                                             
    Auto and other consumer loans breakout                                        
    Triad Manufactured Home loans   $ 129,600     $ 125,906     $ 101,339     $ 3,694     $ 28,261  
    Woodside auto loans     126,129       131,151       124,833       (5,022 )     1,296  
    First Help auto loans     15,971       17,427       5,079       (1,456 )     10,892  
    Other auto loans     2,064       2,690       5,022       (626 )     (2,958 )
    Other consumer loans     7,434       8,449       12,513       (1,015 )     (5,079 )
    Total auto and other consumer loans   $ 281,198     $ 285,623     $ 248,786     $ (4,425 )   $ 32,412  
                                             
    Commercial business loans breakout                                        
    PPP loans   $ –     $ 5     $ 45     $ (5 )   $ (45 )
    Northpointe Bank MPP     38,155       9,150       162       29,005       37,993  
    Secured lines of credit     37,686       28,862       35,833       8,824       1,853  
    Unsecured lines of credit     1,571       1,133       919       438       652  
    SBA loans     7,219       7,146       9,149       73       (1,930 )
    Other commercial business loans     70,696       70,798       55,272       (102 )     15,424  
    Total commercial business loans   $ 155,327     $ 117,094     $ 101,380     $ 38,233     $ 53,947  
                                             

    FIRST NORTHWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
    (Dollars in thousands) (Unaudited)

    Non-GAAP Financial Measures
    This press release contains financial measures that are not in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”). Non-GAAP measures are presented where management believes the information will help investors understand the Company’s results of operations or financial position and assess trends. Where non-GAAP financial measures are used, the comparable GAAP financial measure is also provided. These disclosures should not be viewed as a substitute for operating results determined in accordance with GAAP, and are not necessarily comparable to non-GAAP performance measures that may be presented by other companies. Other banking companies may use names similar to those the Company uses for the non-GAAP financial measures the Company discloses, but may calculate them differently. Investors should understand how the Company and other companies each calculate their non-GAAP financial measures when making comparisons. Reconciliations of the GAAP and non-GAAP measures are presented below.

    Calculation of Total Revenue:

        September 30, 2024     June 30, 2024     March 31, 2024     December 31, 2023     September 30, 2023  
        (Dollars in thousands)  
    Net interest income   $ 14,020     $ 14,235     $ 13,928     $ 14,195     $ 14,950  
    Noninterest income     1,779       7,347       2,188       (2,929 )     2,904  
    Total revenue, net of interest expense(1)   $ 15,799     $ 21,582     $ 16,116     $ 11,266     $ 17,854  
     
    (1)  We believe this non-GAAP metric provides an important measure with which to analyze and evaluate income available for noninterest expenses.
     

    Calculations Based on Tangible Common Equity:

        September 30, 2024     June 30, 2024     March 31, 2024     December 31, 2023     September 30, 2023  
        (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)  
    Total shareholders’ equity   $ 160,789     $ 158,881     $ 160,506     $ 163,340     $ 156,065  
    Less: Goodwill and other intangible assets     1,083       1,084       1,085       1,086       1,087  
    Disallowed non-mortgage loan servicing rights     489       517       489       481       609  
    Total tangible common equity   $ 159,217     $ 157,280     $ 158,932     $ 161,773     $ 154,369  
                                             
    Total assets   $ 2,255,486     $ 2,215,962     $ 2,240,020     $ 2,201,797     $ 2,153,545  
    Less: Goodwill and other intangible assets     1,083       1,084       1,085       1,086       1,087  
    Disallowed non-mortgage loan servicing rights     489       517       489       481       609  
    Total tangible assets   $ 2,253,914     $ 2,214,361     $ 2,238,446     $ 2,200,230     $ 2,151,849  
                                             
    Average shareholders’ equity   $ 160,479     $ 163,079     $ 161,867     $ 155,971     $ 160,994  
    Less: Average goodwill and other intangible assets     1,084       1,085       1,085       1,086       1,087  
    Average disallowed non-mortgage loan servicing rights     517       489       481       608       557  
    Total average tangible common equity   $ 158,878     $ 161,505     $ 160,301     $ 154,277     $ 159,350  
                                             
    Net (loss) income   $ (1,980 )   $ (2,219 )   $ 396     $ (5,522 )   $ 2,504  
    Common shares outstanding     9,365,979       9,453,247       9,442,796       9,611,876       9,630,735  
    GAAP Ratios:                                        
    Equity to total assets     7.13 %     7.17 %     7.17 %     7.42 %     7.25 %
    Return on average equity     -4.91 %     -5.47 %     0.98 %     -14.05 %     6.17 %
    Book value per common share   $ 17.17     $ 16.81     $ 17.00     $ 16.99     $ 16.20  
    Non-GAAP Ratios:                                        
    Tangible common equity to tangible assets(1)     7.06 %     7.10 %     7.10 %     7.35 %     7.17 %
    Return on average tangible common equity(1)     -4.96 %     -5.53 %     0.99 %     -14.20 %     6.23 %
    Tangible book value per common share(1)   $ 17.00     $ 16.64     $ 16.83     $ 16.83     $ 16.03  
     
    (1)  We believe these non-GAAP metrics provide an important measure with which to analyze and evaluate financial condition and capital strength. In addition, we believe that use of tangible equity and tangible assets improves the comparability to other institutions that have not engaged in acquisitions that resulted in recorded goodwill and other intangibles.
     

    FIRST NORTHWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
    (Dollars in thousands) (Unaudited)

        September 30, 2024     September 30, 2023  
        (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)  
    Total shareholders’ equity   $ 160,789     $ 156,065  
    Less: Goodwill and other intangible assets     1,083       1,087  
    Disallowed non-mortgage loan servicing rights     489       609  
    Total tangible common equity   $ 159,217     $ 154,369  
                     
    Total assets   $ 2,255,486     $ 2,153,545  
    Less: Goodwill and other intangible assets     1,083       1,087  
    Disallowed non-mortgage loan servicing rights     489       609  
    Total tangible assets   $ 2,253,914     $ 2,151,849  
                     
    Average shareholders’ equity   $ 161,803     $ 160,573  
    Less: Average goodwill and other intangible assets     1,085       1,088  
    Average disallowed non-mortgage loan servicing rights     496       690  
    Total average tangible common equity   $ 160,222     $ 158,795  
                     
    Net (loss) income   $ (3,803 )   $ 7,808  
    Common shares outstanding     9,365,979       9,630,735  
    GAAP Ratios:                
    Equity to total assets     7.13 %     7.25 %
    Return on average equity     -3.14 %     6.50 %
    Book value per common share   $ 17.17     $ 16.20  
    Non-GAAP Ratios:                
    Tangible common equity to tangible assets(1)     7.06 %     7.17 %
    Return on average tangible common equity(1)     -3.17 %     6.57 %
    Tangible book value per common share(1)   $ 17.00     $ 16.03  
     
    (1)  We believe these non-GAAP metrics provide an important measure with which to analyze and evaluate financial condition and capital strength. In addition, we believe that use of tangible equity and tangible assets improves the comparability to other institutions that have not engaged in acquisitions that resulted in recorded goodwill and other intangibles.
     

    Images accompanying this announcement are available at
    https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/e387e9e8-0a9a-4306-8623-41b739acb402
    https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/4a433c9b-6823-47f3-8843-0d8138f89182
    https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/d5ca9bb6-4a5d-45aa-8336-dd1ae06f0786
    https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/5b9aaf8c-4fd4-437d-af24-7ba8fc60616c

    The MIL Network –

  • MIL-OSI: Eagle Bancorp Montana Earns $2.7 Million, or $0.34 per Diluted Share, in the Third Quarter of 2024; Declares Quarterly Cash Dividend of $0.1425 Per Share

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    HELENA, Mont., Oct. 29, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc. (NASDAQ: EBMT), (the “Company,” “Eagle”), the holding company of Opportunity Bank of Montana (the “Bank”), today reported net income of $2.7 million, or $0.34 per diluted share, in the third quarter of 2024, compared to $1.7 million, or $0.22 per diluted share, in the preceding quarter, and $2.6 million, or $0.34 per diluted share, in the third quarter of 2023. In the first nine months of 2024, net income was $6.3 million, or $0.81 per diluted share, compared to $7.9 million, or $1.01 per diluted share, in the first nine months of 2023.

    Eagle’s board of directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.1425 per share on October 17, 2024. The dividend will be payable December 6, 2024, to shareholders of record November 15, 2024. The current dividend represents an annualized yield of 3.49% based on recent market prices.

    “We produced improved top and bottom line operating results during the third quarter of 2024, with net interest income and noninterest income both increasing compared to the second quarter of 2024,” said Laura F. Clark, President and CEO. “As in previous quarters, we continued to remain selective on the loans we added during the quarter, while adhering to disciplined loan pricing. The result was tempered loan growth during the third quarter of 1.1%, and 4.0% year-over-year. Total deposits increased 2.0% during the quarter over the linked quarter, as we continue to maintain our attractive deposit mix. With our strong deposit franchise, pristine credit quality, and ample capital levels, we are well positioned for growth throughout the remainder of the year and into 2025.”

    Third Quarter 2024 Highlights (at or for the three-month period ended September 30, 2024, except where noted):

    • Net income was $2.7 million, or $0.34 per diluted share, in the third quarter of 2024, compared to $1.7 million, or $0.22 per diluted share, in the preceding quarter, and $2.6 million, or $0.34 per diluted share, in the third quarter a year ago.
    • Net interest margin (“NIM”) was 3.34% in the third quarter of 2024, a seven basis point contraction compared to 3.41% in the preceding quarter and the third quarter a year ago.
    • Revenues (net interest income before the provision for credit losses, plus noninterest income) were $20.8 million in the third quarter of 2024, compared to $19.9 million in the preceding quarter and $21.6 million in the third quarter a year ago.
    • The accretion of the loan purchase discount into loan interest income from acquisitions was $167,000 in the third quarter of 2024, compared to accretion on purchased loans from acquisitions of $304,000 in the preceding quarter.
    • Total loans increased 4.0% to $1.53 billion, at September 30, 2024, compared to $1.48 billion a year earlier, and increased 1.1% compared to $1.52 billion at June 30, 2024.
    • Total deposits increased $35.0 million or 2.2% to $1.65 billion at September 30, 2024, compared to a year earlier, and increased $31.6 million or 2.0%, compared to June 30, 2024.
    • The allowance for credit losses represented 1.12% of portfolio loans and 356.7% of nonperforming loans at September 30, 2024, compared to 1.10% of portfolio loans and 209.3% of nonperforming loans at September 30, 2023.
    • The Company’s available borrowing capacity was approximately $348.1 million at September 30, 2024.
            September 30, 2024
    (Dollars in thousands)     Borrowings Outstanding Remaining Borrowing Capacity
    Federal Home Loan Bank advances $ 219,167 $ 219,365
    Federal Reserve Bank discount window   –   28,734
    Correspondent bank lines of credit   –   100,000
    Total       $ 219,167 $ 348,099
               
    • The Company paid a quarterly cash dividend in the second quarter of $0.1425 per share on September 6, 2024, to shareholders of record August 16, 2024.

    Balance Sheet Results

    Eagle’s total assets increased 4.0% to $2.15 billion at September 30, 2024, compared to $2.06 billion a year ago, and increased 2.2% compared to $2.10 billion three months earlier. The investment securities portfolio totaled $307.0 million at September 30, 2024, compared to $308.8 million a year ago, and $306.9 million at June 30, 2024.

    Eagle originated $58.0 million in new residential mortgages during the quarter and sold $51.0 million in residential mortgages, with an average gross margin on sale of mortgage loans of approximately 3.31%. This production compares to residential mortgage originations of $60.6 million in the preceding quarter with sales of $53.2 million and an average gross margin on sale of mortgage loans of approximately 3.01%. Mortgage volumes remain low as rates have continued to be elevated relative to rates on existing mortgages.

    Total loans increased $58.9 million, or 4.0%, compared to a year ago, and $17.2 million, or 1.1%, from three months earlier. Commercial real estate loans increased 5.2% to $644.0 million at September 30, 2024, compared to $612.0 million a year earlier. Commercial real estate loans were comprised of 69.3% non-owner occupied and 30.7% owner occupied at September 30, 2024. Agricultural and farmland loans increased 5.8% to $290.0 million at September 30, 2024, compared to $274.1 million a year earlier. Residential mortgage loans increased 6.7% to $156.8 million, compared to $146.9 million a year earlier. Commercial loans increased 10.2% to $143.2 million, compared to $130.0 million a year ago. Commercial construction and development loans decreased 17.3% to $125.3 million, compared to $151.6 million a year ago. Home equity loans increased 12.5% to $93.6 million, residential construction loans increased 8.5% to $52.2 million, and consumer loans decreased 1.3% to $29.4 million, compared to a year ago.

    “Our deposit mix continued to shift towards higher yielding deposits due to the higher interest rate environment. However, we anticipate deposit rates will continue to stabilize or improve following the recent Fed rate cuts,” said Miranda Spaulding, CFO.

    Total deposits increased to $1.65 billion at September 30, 2024, compared to $1.62 billion at September 30, 2023, and at June 30, 2024. Noninterest-bearing checking accounts represented 25.4%, interest-bearing checking accounts represented 12.7%, savings accounts represented 12.9%, money market accounts comprised 21.3% and time certificates of deposit made up 27.7% of the total deposit portfolio at September 30, 2024. Time certificates of deposit include $22.1 million in brokered certificates at September 30, 2024, compared to $40.0 million at September 30, 2023, and $26.2 million at June 30, 2024. The average cost of total deposits was 1.76% in the third quarter of 2024, compared to 1.70% in the preceding quarter and 1.28% in the third quarter of 2023. The estimated amount of uninsured deposits was approximately $307.0 million, or 18% of total deposits, at September 30, 2024, compared to $284.0 million, or 17% of total deposits, at June 30, 2024.

    Shareholders’ equity was $177.7 million at September 30, 2024, compared to $157.3 million a year earlier and $170.2 million three months earlier. Book value per share increased to $22.17 at September 30, 2024, compared to $19.69 a year earlier and $21.23 three months earlier. Tangible book value per share, a non-GAAP financial measure calculated by dividing shareholders’ equity, less goodwill and core deposit intangible, by common shares outstanding, was $17.23 at September 30, 2024, compared to $14.55 a year earlier and $16.25 three months earlier.  

    Operating Results

    “Our core NIM declined slightly during the third quarter, compared to the preceding quarter, due to relatively flat yields on interest earning assets and cost of funds expansion,” said Clark. “We anticipate continued stabilization and eventual improvement in our cost of funds as we continue through this rate cycle.”

    Eagle’s NIM was 3.34% in the third quarter of 2024, a seven basis point contraction compared to 3.41% in both the preceding quarter and the third quarter a year ago. The interest accretion on acquired loans totaled $167,000 and resulted in a three basis-point increase in the NIM during the third quarter of 2024, compared to $304,000 and a seven basis-point increase in the NIM during the preceding quarter. Funding costs for the third quarter of 2024 were 2.89%, compared to 2.78% in the second quarter of 2024 and 2.37% in the third quarter of 2023. Average yields on interest earning assets for the third quarter of 2024 increased to 5.66%, compared to 5.64% in the second quarter of 2024 and 5.27% in the third quarter a year ago. For the first nine months of 2024, the NIM was 3.36% compared to 3.57% for the first nine months of 2023.

    Net interest income, before the provision for credit losses, increased to $15.8 million in the third quarter of 2024, compared to $15.6 million in both the second quarter of 2024, and in the third quarter of 2023. Year-to-date, net interest income decreased 1.3% to $46.6 million, compared to $47.3 million in the same period one year earlier.

    Revenues for the third quarter of 2024 increased 4.4% to $20.8 million, compared to $19.9 million in the preceding quarter and decreased 3.9% compared to $21.6 million in the third quarter a year ago. In the first nine months of 2024, revenues were $59.9 million, compared to $64.2 million in the first nine months of 2023. The decrease compared to the first nine months a year ago was largely due to lower volumes in mortgage banking activity.

    Total noninterest income increased 16.7% to $5.0 million in the third quarter of 2024, compared to $4.3 million in the preceding quarter, and decreased 17.4% compared to $6.0 million in the third quarter a year ago. The increase from the preceding quarter was largely due to income from bank owned life insurance of $724,000. Net mortgage banking income, the largest component of noninterest income, totaled $2.6 million in the third quarter of 2024, compared to $2.4 million in the preceding quarter and $4.3 million in the third quarter a year ago. This decrease compared to the third quarter a year ago was largely driven by a decline in net gain on sale of mortgage loans. This was impacted by lower mortgage loan volumes. In the first nine months of 2024, noninterest income decreased 21.9% to $13.2 million, compared to $16.9 million in the first nine months of 2023. Net mortgage banking income decreased 36.0% to $7.2 million in the first nine months of 2024, compared to $11.3 million in the first nine months of 2023. These decreases were driven by a decline in net gain on sale of mortgage loans.

    Third quarter noninterest expense was $17.3 million, which was unchanged compared to the preceding quarter and a 3.4% decrease compared to $17.9 million in the third quarter a year ago. Lower salaries and employee benefits contributed to the decrease compared to the year ago quarter. In the first nine months of 2024, noninterest expense decreased 3.0% to $51.6 million, compared to $53.2 million in the first nine months of 2023.

    For the third quarter of 2024, the Company recorded income tax expense of $529,000. This compared to income tax expense of $444,000 in the preceding quarter and $524,000 in the third quarter of 2023. The effective tax rate for the third quarter of 2024 was 16.3%, compared to 16.6% for the third quarter of 2023. The year-to-date effective tax rate was 17.5% for 2024 compared to 19.5% for the same period in 2023.

    Credit Quality

    During the third quarter of 2024, Eagle recorded a provision for credit losses of $277,000. This compared to a $412,000 provision for credit losses in the preceding quarter and $588,000 in the third quarter a year ago. The allowance for credit losses represented 356.7% of nonperforming loans at September 30, 2024, compared to 330.8% three months earlier and 209.3% a year earlier. Nonperforming loans were $4.8 million at September 30, 2024, $5.1 million at June 30, 2024, and $7.8 million a year earlier.

    Net loan charge-offs totaled $17,000 in the third quarter of 2024, compared to net loan charge-offs of $2,000 in the preceding quarter and net loan charge-offs of $108,000 in the third quarter a year ago. The allowance for credit losses was $17.1 million, or 1.12% of total loans, at September 30, 2024, compared to $16.8 million, or 1.11% of total loans, at June 30, 2024, and $16.2 million, or 1.10% of total loans, a year ago.

    Capital Management

    The ratio of tangible common shareholders’ equity (shareholders’ equity, less goodwill and core deposit intangible) to tangible assets (total assets, less goodwill and core deposit intangible) was 6.56% at September 30, 2024, from 5.75% a year ago and 6.33% three months earlier. As of September 30, 2024, the Bank’s regulatory capital was in excess of all applicable regulatory requirements and is deemed well capitalized. The Bank’s Tier 1 capital to adjusted total average assets was 9.87% as of September 30, 2024.

    About the Company

    Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc. is a bank holding company headquartered in Helena, Montana, and is the holding company of Opportunity Bank of Montana, a community bank established in 1922 that serves consumers and small businesses in Montana through 29 banking offices. Additional information is available on the Bank’s website at www.opportunitybank.com. The shares of Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc. are traded on the NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol “EBMT.”

    Forward Looking Statements

    This release may contain certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and may be identified by the use of such words as “believe,” “will” “expect,” “anticipate,” “should,” “planned,” “estimated,” and “potential.” These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to statements of our goals, intentions and expectations; statements regarding our business plans, prospects, mergers, growth and operating strategies; statements regarding the asset quality of our loan and investment portfolios; and estimates of our risks and future costs and benefits. These forward-looking statements are based on current beliefs and expectations of our management and are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond our control. In addition, these forward-looking statements are subject to assumptions with respect to future business strategies and decisions that are subject to change. These factors include, but are not limited to, changes in laws or government regulations or policies affecting financial institutions, including changes in regulatory fees and capital requirements; general economic conditions and political events, either nationally or in our market areas, that are worse than expected including the ability of the U.S. Congress to increase the U.S. statutory debt limit, as needed, as well as the impact of the 2024 U.S. presidential election; the emergence or continuation of widespread health emergencies or pandemics including the magnitude and duration of the COVID-19 pandemic, including but not limited to vaccine efficacy and immunization rates, new variants, steps taken by governmental and other authorities to contain, mitigate and combat the pandemic, adverse effects on our employees, customers and third-party service providers, the increase in cyberattacks in the current work-from-home environment, the ultimate extent of the impacts on our business, financial position, results of operations, liquidity and prospects, continued deterioration in general business and economic conditions could adversely affect our revenues and the values of our assets and liabilities, lead to a tightening of credit and increase stock price volatility, and potential impairment charges; the impact of volatility in the U.S. banking industry, including the associated impact of any regulatory changes or other mitigation efforts taken by governmental agencies in response thereto; the possibility that future credit losses may be higher than currently expected due to changes in economic assumptions, customer behavior, adverse developments with respect to U.S. economic conditions and other uncertainties, including the impact of supply chain disruptions, inflationary pressures and labor shortages on economic conditions and our business; an inability to access capital markets or maintain deposits or borrowing costs; competition among banks, financial holding companies and other traditional and non-traditional financial service providers; loan demand or residential and commercial real estate values in Montana; the concentration of our business in Montana; our ability to continue to increase and manage our commercial real estate, commercial business and agricultural loans; the costs and effects of legal, compliance and regulatory actions, changes and developments, including the initiation and resolution of legal proceedings (including any securities, bank operations, consumer or employee litigation); inflation and changes in the interest rate environment that reduce our margins or reduce the fair value of financial instruments; adverse changes in the securities markets that lead to impairment in the value of our investment securities and goodwill; other economic, governmental, competitive, regulatory and technological factors that may affect our operations; our ability to implement new technologies and maintain secure and reliable technology systems including those that involve the Bank’s third-party vendors and service providers; cyber incidents, or theft or loss of Company or customer data or money; our ability to appropriately address social, environmental, and sustainability concerns that may arise from our business activities; the effect of our recent or future acquisitions, including the failure to achieve expected revenue growth and/or expense savings, the failure to effectively integrate their operations, the outcome of any legal proceedings and the diversion of management time on issues related to the integration.

    Because of these and other uncertainties, our actual future results may be materially different from the results indicated by these forward-looking statements. All information set forth in this press release is current as of the date of this release and the company undertakes no duty or obligation to update this information.

    Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures

    In addition to results presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles utilized in the United States, or GAAP, the Financial Ratios and Other Data contains non-GAAP financial measures. Non-GAAP financial measures include: 1) core efficiency ratio, 2) tangible book value per share and 3) tangible common equity to tangible assets. The Company uses these non-GAAP financial measures to provide meaningful supplemental information regarding the Company’s operational performance and performance trends, and to enhance investors’ overall understanding of such financial performance. In particular, the use of tangible book value per share and tangible common equity to tangible assets is prevalent among banking regulators, investors and analysts.

    The numerator for the core efficiency ratio is calculated by subtracting acquisition costs and intangible asset amortization from noninterest expense. Tangible assets and tangible common shareholders’ equity are calculated by excluding intangible assets from assets and shareholders’ equity, respectively. For these financial measures, our intangible assets consist of goodwill and core deposit intangible. Tangible book value per share is calculated by dividing tangible common shareholders’ equity by the number of common shares outstanding. We believe that this measure is consistent with the capital treatment by our bank regulatory agencies, which exclude intangible assets from the calculation of risk-based capital ratios and present this measure to facilitate the comparison of the quality and composition of our capital over time and in comparison, to our competitors.

    Non-GAAP financial measures have inherent limitations, are not required to be uniformly applied, and are not audited. Because non-GAAP financial measures are not standardized, it may not be possible to compare these financial measures with other companies’ non-GAAP financial measures having the same or similar names. Further, the non-GAAP financial measure of tangible book value per share should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for book value per share or total shareholders’ equity determined in accordance with GAAP, and may not be comparable to a similarly titled measure reported by other companies. Reconciliation of the GAAP and non-GAAP financial measures are presented below.

                   
    Balance Sheet              
    (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)       (Unaudited)  
                September 30, June 30, September 30,
                  2024     2024     2023  
                     
    Assets:              
      Cash and due from banks       $ 22,954   $ 22,361   $ 19,743  
      Interest bearing deposits in banks       19,035     1,401     1,040  
      Federal funds sold           200     –     –  
      Total cash and cash equivalents       42,189     23,762     20,783  
      Securities available-for-sale, at fair value       306,982     306,869     308,786  
      Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) stock       11,218     10,136     10,438  
      Federal Reserve Bank (“FRB”) stock       4,131     4,131     4,131  
      Mortgage loans held-for-sale, at fair value       13,429     10,518     17,880  
      Loans:              
      Real estate loans:            
      Residential 1-4 family         156,811     157,053     146,938  
      Residential 1-4 family construction       52,217     50,228     48,135  
      Commercial real estate         644,019     627,326     611,963  
      Commercial construction and development     125,323     137,427     151,614  
      Farmland           145,356     142,353     143,789  
      Other loans:              
      Home equity           93,646     93,213     83,221  
      Consumer           29,445     29,118     29,832  
      Commercial           143,190     143,641     129,952  
      Agricultural           144,645     137,134     130,329  
      Total loans           1,534,652     1,517,493     1,475,773  
      Allowance for credit losses         (17,130 )   (16,830 )   (16,230 )
      Net loans           1,517,522     1,500,663     1,459,543  
      Accrued interest and dividends receivable       14,844     13,195     13,657  
      Mortgage servicing rights, net         15,443     15,614     15,738  
      Assets held-for-sale, at cost         257     257     –  
      Premises and equipment, net         100,297     98,397     92,979  
      Cash surrender value of life insurance, net       52,852     48,529     47,647  
      Goodwill           34,740     34,740     34,740  
      Core deposit intangible, net         4,834     5,168     6,264  
      Other assets           26,375     26,976     30,478  
      Total assets         $ 2,145,113   $ 2,098,955   $ 2,063,064  
                     
    Liabilities:              
      Deposit accounts:              
      Noninterest bearing       $ 419,760   $ 400,113   $ 435,655  
      Interest bearing           1,230,752     1,218,752     1,179,823  
      Total deposits         1,650,512     1,618,865     1,615,478  
      Accrued expenses and other liabilities       38,593     35,804     31,597  
      FHLB advances and other borrowings       219,167     215,050     199,757  
      Other long-term debt, net         59,111     59,074     58,962  
      Total liabilities         1,967,383     1,928,793     1,905,794  
                     
    Shareholders’ Equity:              
      Preferred stock (par value $0.01 per share; 1,000,000 shares      
      authorized; no shares issued or outstanding)     –     –     –  
      Common stock (par value $0.01; 20,000,000 shares authorized;      
      8,507,429 shares issued; 8,016,784, 8,016,784 and 7,988,132      
      shares outstanding at September 30, 2024, June 30, 2024 and      
      September 30, 2023, respectively       85     85     85  
      Additional paid-in capital         109,040     108,962     109,422  
      Unallocated common stock held by Employee Stock Ownership Plan   (4,154 )   (4,297 )   (4,727 )
      Treasury stock, at cost (490,645, 490,645 and 519,297 shares at      
      September 30, 2024, June 30, 2024 and September 30, 2023, respectively)           (11,124 )   (11,124 )   (11,574 )
      Retained earnings           98,979     97,413     94,979  
      Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax     (15,096 )   (20,877 )   (30,915 )
      Total shareholders’ equity       177,730     170,162     157,270  
      Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity   $ 2,145,113   $ 2,098,955   $ 2,063,064  
                     
    Income Statement      (Unaudited)   (Unaudited)
    (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)     Three Months Ended   Nine Months Ended
                  September 30, June 30, September 30,   September 30,
                    2024   2024   2023     2024   2023  
    Interest and dividend income:                
      Interest and fees on loans     $ 23,802 $ 22,782 $ 21,068   $ 68,526 $ 57,942  
      Securities available-for-sale       2,598   2,631   2,794     7,953   8,586  
      FRB and FHLB dividends       266   264   212     777   480  
      Other interest income       94   145   20     268   66  
        Total interest and dividend income       26,760   25,822   24,094     77,524   67,074  
    Interest expense:                  
      Interest expense on deposits       7,190   6,884   5,152     20,622   11,767  
      FHLB advances and other borrowings       3,084   2,625   2,672     8,206   5,993  
      Other long-term debt       684   681   683     2,048   2,035  
        Total interest expense       10,958   10,190   8,507     30,876   19,795  
    Net interest income         15,802   15,632   15,587     46,648   47,279  
    Provision for credit losses       277   412   588     554   1,186  
        Net interest income after provision for credit losses     15,525   15,220   14,999     46,094   46,093  
                             
    Noninterest income:                
      Service charges on deposit accounts       430   428   447     1,258   1,313  
      Mortgage banking, net       2,602   2,417   4,338     7,196   11,252  
      Interchange and ATM fees       662   640   643     1,865   1,861  
      Appreciation in cash surrender value of life insurance     1,038   320   382     1,646   1,165  
      Net loss on sale of available-for-sale securities       –   –   –     –   (222 )
      Other noninterest income       251   464   225     1,239   1,541  
        Total noninterest income       4,983   4,269   6,035     13,204   16,910  
                             
    Noninterest expense:                
      Salaries and employee benefits       9,894   10,273   10,837     29,885   31,614  
      Occupancy and equipment expense       2,134   2,104   1,956     6,337   6,100  
      Data processing       1,587   1,382   1,486     4,494   4,270  
      Advertising         277   316   340     846   930  
      Amortization         337   348   386     1,054   1,201  
      Loan costs         385   412   517     1,195   1,426  
      FDIC insurance premiums       295   284   301     878   862  
      Professional and examination fees       438   423   408     1,345   1,484  
      Other noninterest expense       1,923   1,765   1,644     5,576   5,311  
        Total noninterest expense       17,270   17,307   17,875     51,610   53,198  
                             
    Income before provision for income taxes       3,238   2,182   3,159     7,688   9,805  
    Provision for income taxes       529   444   524     1,343   1,913  
    Net income         $ 2,709 $ 1,738 $ 2,635   $ 6,345 $ 7,892  
                             
    Basic earnings per common share     $ 0.35 $ 0.22 $ 0.34   $ 0.81 $ 1.01  
    Diluted earnings per common share     $ 0.34 $ 0.22 $ 0.34   $ 0.81 $ 1.01  
                             
    Basic weighted average shares outstanding       7,836,921   7,830,925   7,784,279     7,830,947   7,787,987  
                             
    Diluted weighted average shares outstanding       7,860,138   7,845,272   7,791,966     7,848,196   7,792,593  
                             
    ADDITIONAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION   (Unaudited)  
    (Dollars in thousands, except per share data) Three or Nine Months Ended
          September 30, June 30, September 30,
            2024     2024     2023  
               
    Mortgage Banking Activity (For the quarter):      
      Net gain on sale of mortgage loans $ 1,691   $ 1,600   $ 3,591  
      Net change in fair value of loans held-for-sale and derivatives   159     12     (71 )
      Mortgage servicing income, net   752     805     818  
      Mortgage banking, net   $ 2,602   $ 2,417   $ 4,338  
               
    Mortgage Banking Activity (Year-to-date):      
      Net gain on sale of mortgage loans $ 4,705     $ 8,551  
      Net change in fair value of loans held-for-sale and derivatives   (2 )     234  
      Mortgage servicing income, net   2,493       2,467  
      Mortgage banking, net   $ 7,196     $ 11,252  
               
    Performance Ratios (For the quarter):      
      Return on average assets   0.51 %   0.33 %   0.51 %
      Return on average equity   6.56 %   4.30 %   6.63 %
      Yield on average interest earning assets   5.66 %   5.64 %   5.27 %
      Cost of funds     2.89 %   2.78 %   2.37 %
      Net interest margin   3.34 %   3.41 %   3.41 %
      Core efficiency ratio*   81.47 %   85.22 %   80.89 %
               
    Performance Ratios (Year-to-date):      
      Return on average assets   0.41 %     0.53 %
      Return on average equity   5.19 %     6.54 %
      Yield on average interest earning assets   5.59 %     5.07 %
      Cost of funds     2.78 %     1.94 %
      Net interest margin   3.36 %     3.57 %
      Core efficiency ratio*   84.47 %     81.01 %
               
    * The core efficiency ratio is a non-GAAP ratio that is calculated by dividing non-interest expense, exclusive of acquisition
    costs and intangible asset amortization, by the sum of net interest income and non-interest income.    
               
               
    ADDITIONAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION      
    (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)      
            (Unaudited)  
    Asset Quality Ratios and Data: As of or for the Three Months Ended
          September 30, June 30, September 30,
            2024     2024     2023  
               
      Nonaccrual loans   $ 3,859   $ 4,012   $ 7,753  
      Loans 90 days past due and still accruing   944     1,076     –  
      Total nonperforming loans     4,803     5,088     7,753  
      Other real estate owned and other repossessed assets   4     4     –  
      Total nonperforming assets   $ 4,807   $ 5,092   $ 7,753  
               
      Nonperforming loans / portfolio loans   0.31 %   0.34 %   0.53 %
      Nonperforming assets / assets   0.22 %   0.24 %   0.38 %
      Allowance for credit losses / portfolio loans   1.12 %   1.11 %   1.10 %
      Allowance for credit losses/ nonperforming loans   356.65 %   330.78 %   209.34 %
      Gross loan charge-offs for the quarter $ 22   $ 12   $ 122  
      Gross loan recoveries for the quarter $ 5   $ 10   $ 14  
      Net loan charge-offs for the quarter $ 17   $ 2   $ 108  
               
               
          September 30, June 30, September 30,
            2024     2024     2023  
    Capital Data (At quarter end):      
      Common shareholders’ equity (book value) per share $ 22.17   $ 21.23   $ 19.69  
      Tangible book value per share** $ 17.23   $ 16.25   $ 14.55  
      Shares outstanding   8,016,784     8,016,784     7,988,132  
      Tangible common equity to tangible assets***   6.56 %   6.33 %   5.75 %
               
    Other Information:        
      Average investment securities for the quarter $ 305,730   $ 306,207   $ 319,308  
      Average investment securities year-to-date $ 308,688   $ 310,168   $ 335,898  
      Average loans for the quarter **** $ 1,547,246   $ 1,513,313   $ 1,476,584  
      Average loans year-to-date **** $ 1,519,951   $ 1,506,303   $ 1,417,291  
      Average earning assets for the quarter $ 1,874,669   $ 1,837,418   $ 1,812,610  
      Average earning assets year-to-date $ 1,847,468   $ 1,833,867   $ 1,768,361  
      Average total assets for the quarter $ 2,116,839   $ 2,077,448   $ 2,052,443  
      Average total assets year-to-date $ 2,086,951   $ 2,072,013   $ 1,999,864  
      Average deposits for the quarter $ 1,622,254   $ 1,625,882   $ 1,602,770  
      Average deposits year-to-date $ 1,624,936   $ 1,625,826   $ 1,596,201  
      Average equity for the quarter $ 165,162   $ 161,533   $ 158,933  
      Average equity year-to-date $ 163,106   $ 162,084   $ 160,917  
               
    ** The tangible book value per share is a non-GAAP ratio that is calculated by dividing shareholders’ equity,  
    less goodwill and core deposit intangible, by common shares outstanding.      
    *** The tangible common equity to tangible assets is a non-GAAP ratio that is calculated by dividing shareholders’  
    equity, less goodwill and core deposit intangible, by total assets, less goodwill and core deposit intangible.  
    **** Includes loans held for sale      
           
    Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures              
                           
    Core Efficiency Ratio     (Unaudited)     (Unaudited)  
    (Dollars in thousands)   Three Months Ended   Nine Months Ended  
              September 30, June 30, September 30,   September 30,  
                2024     2024     2023       2024     2023    
    Calculation of Core Efficiency Ratio:              
      Noninterest expense $ 17,270   $ 17,307   $ 17,875     $ 51,610   $ 53,198    
      Intangible asset amortization   (337 )   (348 )   (386 )     (1,054 )   (1,201 )  
        Core efficiency ratio numerator   16,933     16,959     17,489       50,556     51,997    
                           
      Net interest income   15,802     15,632     15,587       46,648     47,279    
      Noninterest income   4,983     4,269     6,035       13,204     16,910    
        Core efficiency ratio denominator   20,785     19,901     21,622       59,852     64,189    
                           
      Core efficiency ratio (non-GAAP)   81.47 %   85.22 %   80.89 %     84.47 %   81.01 %  
                           
    Tangible Book Value and Tangible Assets   (Unaudited)
    (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)   September 30, June 30, September 30,
                  2024     2024     2023  
    Tangible Book Value:            
      Shareholders’ equity     $ 177,730   $ 170,162   $ 157,270  
      Goodwill and core deposit intangible, net     (39,574 )   (39,908 )   (41,004 )
        Tangible common shareholders’ equity (non-GAAP) $ 138,156   $ 130,254   $ 116,266  
                     
      Common shares outstanding at end of period   8,016,784     8,016,784     7,988,132  
                     
      Common shareholders’ equity (book value) per share (GAAP) $ 22.17   $ 21.23   $ 19.69  
                     
      Tangible common shareholders’ equity (tangible book value)      
        per share (non-GAAP)     $ 17.23   $ 16.25   $ 14.55  
                     
    Tangible Assets:            
      Total assets       $ 2,145,113   $ 2,098,955   $ 2,063,064  
      Goodwill and core deposit intangible, net     (39,574 )   (39,908 )   (41,004 )
        Tangible assets (non-GAAP)   $ 2,105,539   $ 2,059,047   $ 2,022,060  
                     
      Tangible common shareholders’ equity to tangible assets      
        (non-GAAP)         6.56 %   6.33 %   5.75 %
                     
    Contacts: Laura F. Clark, President and CEO
      (406) 457-4007
      Miranda J. Spaulding, SVP and CFO
      (406) 441-5010  

    The MIL Network –

  • MIL-OSI Economics: A test of resolve: credible resolution following the 2023 banking turmoil

    Source: Bank for International Settlements

    Introduction

    I would like to welcome you all to the Resolution Conference 2024, the first that has been co-organised by the BIS Financial Stability Institute (FSI), the Financial Stability Board (FSB) and the International Association of Deposit Insurers (IADI). This event is motivated by the banking turmoil in March 2023. The 18 months that have passed since those events have given time to reflect seriously on it and derive some lessons. This conference provides an opportunity to take stock, compare notes and try to identify a productive way forward.

    Scene-setting

    It is now commonplace to say that the March 2023 failures of several US regional banks, followed a week later by the near failure of Credit Suisse, were the first meaningful test of the international resolution framework that was put in place following the Great Financial Crisis (GFC).

    The headline message is that large bank failures did not lead to a systemic crisis. Authorities managed them in an orderly manner with no ultimate loss to public funds. Creditors and shareholders bore losses. In the case of Credit Suisse, there was a significant writedown of loss-absorbing instruments. This is a noteworthy achievement, and stands in stark contrast to the GFC.

    The extensive work to put in place cross-border cooperative arrangements has demonstrably strengthened the financial system. The outcomes might have been very different without the planning and coordination that took place between home and host authorities, and the understanding and trust that have been developed.

    However, work remains to be done. The reports published last year by the FSB and IADI set out lessons learned for resolution and deposit insurance.1 They include the risk of faster failures, accelerated by digital technologies; the scope of resolution planning and requirements for loss-absorbing capacity (LAC); and flexibility in resolution strategies. Other reports, including by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, elaborate on the supervisory shortcomings and the vulnerabilities arising from large quantities of uninsured deposits. Work on all these issues is ongoing.

    In any case, I would like to concentrate my remarks on two elements of the bank resolution framework that I think must be tackled as we go forward. The first is the power to bail-in creditors as a key element of resolution strategies. The second is the need to put in place effective facilities for providing liquidity in resolution. The events of March 2023 highlighted the importance of both. They are also among the elements of a resolution framework that are most challenging to implement.

    The credibility of bail-in

    Bail-in powers are core to the resolution framework adopted after the GFC. Bail-in allows a systemically important bank to be recapitalised without the need to find a buyer for its business or to split up its operations, at least in the short term. Appropriate liabilities absorb losses without putting a failing bank into insolvency. Crucially, it is designed to ensure that a bank’s owners and investors, rather than depositors or taxpayers, bear the costs of resolution costs.

    In practice, a bail-in is a highly complex transaction involving multiple parties, and a huge amount of work has been carried out on how to execute it. A typical bail-in would involve multiple valuations; a mechanism to write down and cancel instruments, which are likely to be traded; and the issuance of new shares to the bailed-in debt holders. The process has been mapped out in detail by resolution authorities. However, a full bail-in strategy remains untested.

    Credit Suisse had a resolution strategy based on bail-in, and FINMA and key host authorities had prepared extensively to execute that strategy.

    In the end, the Swiss authorities chose not to follow the resolution playbook because they had another option that achieved their objectives: a state-brokered commercial merger of Credit Suisse and UBS. Nevertheless, the contractual writedown of all the outstanding Additional Tier 1 (AT1) capital instruments issued by Credit Suisse was a key element of the transaction. The writedown extinguished liabilities amounting to CHF 16 billion from the bank’s balance sheet.2

    Although the writedown was more limited than that planned under the full bail-in strategy for Credit Suisse, it demonstrates that bail-in is a core instrument in the crisis management framework. Contrary to what some commentators have feared, a substantial debt writedown is possible and can be executed without significant systemic disruption.

    Nevertheless, there are a few lessons to draw from this to reinforce that bail-in is credible and feasible.

    Flexible resolution toolkits

    First, authorities need flexibility. Planning is essential, but it cannot be prescriptive. We cannot know with absolute confidence in advance how a failure will happen and what actions will best safeguard financial stability. Accordingly, authorities need options so that they can shape their response to the circumstances of a failure. This implies a toolkit approach under which authorities can combine the use of different tools.

    The Credit Suisse transaction demonstrated that, even in the case of a global systemically important bank (G-SIB), bail-in may not be an exclusive strategy, but debt writedown could be a core element. Moreover, bail-in is not a tool exclusively for G-SIBs. For other banks, the writedown of liabilities in resolution can finance transfers of business and reduce the demands on industry-funded sources such as deposit insurance funds.

    Flexibility of this kind brings operational complexities. A toolbox approach means that authorities and firms need to accommodate different options in resolution planning. Banks will need the systems and capabilities to support those options. Key aspects of resolvability such as structure and LAC may become even more complex. However, an effective toolbox approach will further reduce the residual risk that public funds will be needed in crisis management.

    Loss-absorbing capacity

    Second, for bail-in to be credible banks must have liabilities that can be written down with legal certainty and without systemic impact. The FSB’s TLAC standard ensures this for G-SIBs. Some jurisdictions have extended similar requirements for LAC to other banks that could be systemic in failure.

    For example, the EU requirement for resolution-related LAC, the minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL) – applies to all banks. The amount above the regulatory minimum required for individual banks is based on their resolution strategy. It aims to ensure that any bank that is expected to be resolved rather than wound up maintains LAC in sufficient quantity and quality to absorb losses and recapitalise it in resolution.

    The US financial regulators have consulted on a proposal to require banks with $100 billion or more in assets to maintain a layer of long-term debt. This additional LAC would be used, in the event of a bank’s failure, to absorb losses and increase the resolution options. It should also foster depositor confidence among uninsured deposits.

    The three US regional banks that failed in 2023 had little or no outstanding long-term debt. It has been observed elsewhere that if the proposed requirement had applied to Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank, they might have been resolved within the FDIC’s normal funding constraints, without a systemic risk exception being required.3

    If bail-in is to help fund resolution transfers, there need to be instruments that can be written down. The amounts are lower than that needed to recapitalise the bank and finance restructuring in a “pure” bail-in. Nevertheless, calibrating those requirements may be challenging.

    Moreover, meeting LAC requirements should not put banks’ legitimate business models in jeopardy. This is particularly relevant for banks that are predominantly deposit funded. A pragmatic way to alleviate the challenges for those banks is to take account of the resolution funding available from external sources, such as deposit insurance or resolution funds, when setting LAC requirements.4

    Liquidity for crisis management

    Let me turn now to liquidity for crisis management. Resolution powers can recapitalise a failing bank through bail-in. However, capital is not enough on its own. Without liquidity, the resolution will fail.

    Market funding will almost certainly not be available to a bank following its resolution until counterparty confidence can be restored. Resolution frameworks therefore require a credible source of liquidity, at the necessary scale and for a sufficient period of time to allow a resolved firm to return to market-based funding.

    This is recognised by the FSB, which has published two sets of guidance on funding in resolution. However, the arrangements in place vary considerably across jurisdictions and in many cases are not designed for the resolution needs of systemically important banks.

    The liquidity arrangements that were needed in the case of Credit Suisse support this point. The Swiss government had been working on a public liquidity backstop, but this was not yet in place in March 2023. Accordingly, the authorities had to adopt emergency legislation to enable the Swiss National Bank (SNB) to provide a liquidity facility of up to CHF 200 billion. Part of that lending was uncollateralised and coupled with a privileged bankruptcy status for the SNB and part was backed by a guarantee from the Swiss state.

    This case illustrates that ordinary central bank lending arrangements, including emergency liquidity assistance, may not be sufficient for resolution. The amount of liquidity needed by a systemically important bank will be considerable and required over an extended period. Moreover, lending may need to be secured against a wider range of assets or, in extreme circumstances, be uncollateralised. Arrangements for resolution funding must meet these needs. This implies a fiscal backstop to increase the firepower where that is needed.

    A fiscal backstop might appear to introduce a risk to public funds, something that the framework for ending “too big to fail” was designed to avoid. But the risks of loss to public funds should be low. It’s worth noting that all lending in relation to Credit Suisse was repaid, and no losses were incurred by the SNB or the Swiss state under its indemnity. If resolution is effective, the bank will be viable and the borrowing should be repaid.

    Concluding remarks

    I will end where I began. Financial crises provide a good opportunity to identify flaws or shortcomings in the policy framework. The March 2023 banking turmoil was the most significant banking crisis since the GFC and the subsequent policy reforms. Therefore, we should grasp this opportunity to draw lessons.

    Overall, authorities managed to preserve financial stability. In Switzerland, that was accomplished, despite the failure of a G-SIB, without any cost to the taxpayer. This was a remarkable achievement, and the resolution framework developed after the GFC contributed to that.

    But we also need to take note of the obstacles encountered in the process. In particular, it is clear that maximising the potential of bail-in and the provision of liquidity in resolution are pending tasks that need to be addressed.

    Work to do that is ongoing, and this conference is a small but significant part of that process. I am delighted that so many people have come to Basel to participate, and I expect productive discussions during the day.

    MIL OSI Economics –

  • MIL-OSI Security: Three Defendants Convicted in Murder-for-Hire Conspiracy Trial

    Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation FBI Crime News (b)

    MOBILE, AL – Following a three-week trial, a federal jury convicted three defendants of a murder-for-hire conspiracy, murder for hire, a carjacking conspiracy, interstate transportation of a stolen vehicle, evidence tampering, and witness tampering.

    According to court documents and evidence presented at trial, John Fitzgerald McCarroll, Jr., 30, Darrius Dwayne Rowser, 20, and Lyteria Isheeia Hollis, 30, each of Mobile, were part of a plot to murder an individual as retribution for a prior killing. Jurors reviewed evidence that McCarroll, aided by Hollis and others, directed payments to hired shooters, including Rowser and others, to carry out the intended murder. The evidence included text messages, social media evidence, financial records, surveillance videos, firearm and toolmark evidence, DNA evidence, and cell tower data, among other things.

    As part of the murder plot, evidence showed that McCarroll’s hired shooters attempted but failed to kill the intended target during multiple nightclub shootings. In September 2022, Reginald Dennis Alan Fluker, who pleaded guilty to the conspiracy, opened fire in the Bank Nightlife club using a gun provided to him by McCarroll. Fluker shot the wrong person, who later died of his injuries. In November 2022, Rowser used a machinegun provided to him by McCarroll to shoot at the intended target inside the Paparazzi Lounge. Rowser likewise missed the target and instead hit four victims, one of whom was rendered paralyzed.

    The evidence also showed that as part of the conspiracy, Rowser and others, at McCarroll’s direction, traveled to Mississippi to steal cars for use in surveilling the target of the plot. In September 2022, during an attempted carjacking in D’Iberville, Mississippi, Rowser shot and killed a victim. As part of that murder, Rowser and a coconspirator traveled back to Mobile and burned the stolen car they were using during the attempted carjacking.

    The evidence further showed that in December 2022, at McCarroll’s direction, Rowser and other coconspirators traveled to the Walmart on I-65 Service Road South in Mobile to purchase a GPS tracker for the target’s vehicle. During that trip, Rowser and a coconspirator opened fire into the self-checkout area of the store, striking two victims.

    Finally, evidence showed that following the arrests of McCarroll, Fluker, and other members of the conspiracy, the defendants attempted to tamper with evidence and a witness. Specifically, McCarroll directed Hollis to hide a weapon that he had previously purchased for Fluker because of Fluker’s participation in the murder plot. Federal agents seized that gun from Hollis’s house. Additionally, the jury convicted McCarroll of attempting to tamper with Fluker’s testimony by having him sign a sham affidavit, which was filed in state court to earn McCarroll a bond from jail.

    U.S. District Judge Terry F. Moorer scheduled sentencing for March 6, 2025. Under federal law, each defendant faces a mandatory life sentence.

    U.S. Attorney Sean P. Costello of the Southern District of Alabama made the announcement.

    The Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, the Mobile Police Department, and the D’Iberville, Mississippi Police Department are investigating the case.

    Assistant U.S. Attorneys Justin Roller, Gaillard Ladd, and Kasee Heisterhagen are prosecuting the case on behalf of the United States.

    MIL Security OSI –

  • MIL-OSI Security: U.S. Attorney’s Office Announces Second Conviction in 2019 Kidnapping

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    ALBUQUERQUE – A Zuni woman pleaded guilty in federal court to a count of kidnapping. This crime eventually resulted in the victim’s death at the hands of a co-defendant and the burning of the victim’s body in an attempt by the co-defendant to conceal evidence. Her co-defendant was previously convicted and sentenced to prison for the subsequent killing.

    According to court documents, between July 1 and July 16, 2019, Kendra Panteah, 37, participated in and continued the confinement of John Doe in the trunk of his own vehicle and contacted the co-defendant for assistance in order to avoid getting in trouble.

    Along with the co-defendant, Panteah then drove around for over a day through the Navajo Nation with John Doe locked in the trunk before stopping near Bass Lake, NM. There, John Doe attempted to escape by forcing the trunk open. Before he could get out, however, the co-defendant repeatedly stabbed Doe with a machete. The co-defendant then closed the trunk on the victim, and Panteah and the co-defendant then sat on the trunk until John Doe stopped moving. Doe died as a result of the stab wounds. Panteah and co-defendant then drove the vehicle, with Doe’s body in the trunk to a residence where it was abandoned for several days.

    The co-defendant eventually towed the vehicle to a remote location, doused it with gasoline, and set it on fire with John Doe’s body inside to destroy evidence of the crime. Doe was only identified through hip replacement devices found in the burned vehicle.

    Her co-defendant, Gilbert John Jr., pleaded guilty to second-degree murder and was sentenced to 21 years in prison.

    At sentencing, Panteah faces between a binding range of no less than 10 years up to no more than 18 years imprisonment. Upon her release from prison, Panteah will be subject to up to five years of supervised release.

    U.S. Attorney Alexander M.M. Uballez and Raul Bujanda, Special Agent in Charge of the FBI Albuquerque Field Office, made the announcement today.

    The Gallup Resident Agency of the FBI’s Albuquerque Field Office investigated this case with assistance from the Navajo Police Department and Department of Criminal Investigations. Assistant United States Attorneys Mark A. Probasco and Alexander F. Flores are prosecuting the case.

    # # #

    MIL Security OSI –

  • MIL-OSI Security: United States Attorney Announces Election Day Program

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    United States Attorney Timothy T. Duax announced today that Assistant United States Attorney (AUSA) Daniel Tvedt will lead the efforts of his Office in connection with the Justice Department’s nationwide Election Day Program for the upcoming November 5, 2024, general election.  AUSA Tvedt has been appointed to serve as the District Election Officer (DEO) for the Northern District of Iowa, and in that capacity is responsible for overseeing the District’s handling of election day complaints of voting rights concerns, threats of violence to election officials or staff, and election fraud, in consultation with Justice Department Headquarters in Washington.

    United States Attorney Duax said, “Every citizen must be able to vote without interference or discrimination and to have that vote counted in a fair and free election.  Similarly, election officials and staff must be able to serve without being subject to unlawful threats of violence.  The Department of Justice will always work tirelessly to protect the integrity of the election process.”

    The Department of Justice has an important role in deterring and combatting discrimination and intimidation at the polls, threats of violence directed at election officials and poll workers, and election fraud.  The Department will address these violations wherever they occur.  The Department’s longstanding Election Day Program furthers these goals and also seeks to ensure public confidence in the electoral process by providing local points of contact within the Department for the public to report possible federal election law violations.

    Federal law protects against such crimes as threatening violence against election officials or staff, intimidating, impersonating voters, altering vote tallies, stuffing ballot boxes, and marking ballots for voters against their wishes or without their input.  It also contains special protections for the rights of voters, and provides that they can vote free from interference, including intimidation, and other acts designed to prevent or discourage people from voting or voting for the candidate of their choice.  The Voting Rights Act protects the right of voters to mark their own ballot or to be assisted by a person of their choice (where voters need assistance because of disability or inability to read or write in English).   

    United States Attorney Duax stated that: “The franchise is the cornerstone of American democracy.  We all must ensure that those who are entitled to the franchise can exercise it if they choose, and that those who seek to corrupt it are brought to justice.  In order to respond to complaints of voting rights concerns and election fraud during the upcoming election, and to ensure that such complaints are directed to the appropriate authorities, AUSA/DEO Tvedt will be on duty in the Cedar Rapids area while the polls are open.  He can be reached by the public at the following telephone number: 319-363-6333.  AUSA Ron Timmons will be on duty in the Sioux City area and can be reached at 712-255-6011.”

    In addition, the FBI will have special agents available in each field office and resident agency throughout the country to receive allegations of election fraud and other election abuses on election day.  The local FBI field office can be reached by the public at 402-493-8688.

    Complaints about possible violations of the federal voting rights laws can be made directly to the Civil Rights Division in Washington, DC by complaint form at https://civilrights.justice.gov/ or by phone at 800-253-3931.

    United States Attorney Duax said, “Ensuring free and fair elections depends in large part on the assistance of the American electorate.  It is important that those who have specific information about voting rights concerns or election fraud make that information available to the Department of Justice.”

    Please note, however, in the case of a crime of violence or intimidation, please call 911 immediately and before contacting federal authorities.  State and local police have primary jurisdiction over polling places, and almost always have faster reaction capacity in an emergency.

    MIL Security OSI –

  • MIL-OSI Security: Eight Defendants Charged in Federal Drug Trafficking Probe Targeting Fentanyl and Cocaine Sales in Chicago

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    CHICAGO — A federal investigation has resulted in federal drug and firearm charges against eight individuals for allegedly trafficking fentanyl and cocaine on the South Side of Chicago.

    An indictment unsealed Friday in federal court in Chicago accuses the eight defendants of conspiring to traffic fentanyl and cocaine from March 2023 to July 2024.  During the conspiracy, the defendants used a residence in the 2000 block of West 69th Place in the Englewood neighborhood of Chicago to carry out their illicit activities, the indictment states.  The defendants possessed loaded handguns while engaged in their drug trafficking crimes, the indictment states.

    During the investigation, law enforcement seized distribution quantities of suspected fentanyl-laced heroin and crack cocaine, as well as more than a dozen firearms and associated ammunition.

    Charged with federal drug and firearm offenses are PATRICK TUCKER, 33, THOMAS CUNNINGHAM, 29, DARIUS JOHNSON, 23, KYWANTE SHUMAKE, 26, KEONTIS SHUMAKE, 23, KAMARI ROSS, 26, DREQUAN BASS, 26, and LACOLA WILLIAMS, 26, all of Chicago. The charges in the indictment carry a maximum sentence of life in federal prison.  Tucker and Cunningham also face a mandatory minimum sentence of 15 years, while the others face a mandatory minimum of ten years.  The defendants were arraigned in U.S. District Court in Chicago and pleaded not guilty to the charges.

    The indictment was announced by Morris Pasqual, Acting United States Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois, Douglas S. DePodesta, Special Agent-in-Charge of the Chicago Field Office of the FBI, and Sean Fitzgerald, Special Agent-in-Charge of the Chicago office of Homeland Security Investigations.  Valuable assistance was provided by the Chicago Police Department.  The government is represented by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Maureen B. McCurry and Michael Maione.

    The case is part of an Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Forces investigation.  OCDETF identifies, disrupts, and dismantles drug traffickers and other criminal offenders that threaten the United States by using a prosecutor-led, intelligence-driven, multi-agency approach that leverages the strengths of federal, state, and local law enforcement against criminal networks.

    The public is reminded that an indictment contains only charges and is not evidence of guilt.  The defendants are presumed innocent and entitled to a fair trial at which the government has the burden of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

    MIL Security OSI –

  • MIL-OSI Security: CAREER ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY TO LEAD DOJ ELECTION DAY PROGRAM IN THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    Fargo – United States Attorney Mac Schneider announced today that Assistant United States Attorney (AUSA) Rick L. Volk will lead the efforts of the Office in connection with the Justice Department’s nationwide Election Day Program for the upcoming November 5, 2024, general election.  AUSA Volk has served as the District Election Officer (DEO) for the District of North Dakota for the past 20 years, and in that capacity is responsible for overseeing the Office’s handling of Election Day complaints of voting rights concerns, threats of violence to election officials or staff, and election fraud, in consultation with Justice Department headquarters in Washington.

    “Lawfully casting a vote without interference or discrimination and having that voted counted in a fair and free election is a fundamental right in North Dakota and across the country,” Schneider said. “There is a history in the District of North Dakota of election officials and staff serving their critical roles without being subject to unlawful threats or violence, and the Department of Justice will do its part to uphold that tradition and protect the integrity of the election process. With an experienced career federal prosecutor as a point of contact on Election Day, our Office stands ready to respond to complaints of voting rights concerns or election fraud in real time while the polls are open.” 

    Volk has led the Office’s Election Day efforts since 2004 and has served as DEO during five presidential elections. In order to respond to complaints of voting rights concerns and election fraud during the upcoming election, and to ensure that such complaints are directed to the appropriate authorities, Volk will be on duty while the polls are open in the District of North Dakota.  He can be reached by the public at the following telephone numbers: 701-530-2420 and/or 701-297-7400.

    In addition, the FBI will have special agents available in each field office and resident agency throughout the country to receive allegations of election fraud and other election abuses on election day. The relevant FBI field office for the District of North Dakota can be reached by the public at 763-569-8000.

    Complaints about possible violations of federal voting rights laws can be made directly to the Civil Rights Division in Washington, DC by complaint form at https://civilrights.justice.gov/ or by phone at 800-253-3931.

    Please note, however, in the case of a crime of violence or intimidation, please call 911 immediately and before contacting federal authorities.  State and local police have primary jurisdiction over polling places, and almost always have faster reaction capacity in an emergency.

    The Department of Justice has an important role in deterring and combatting discrimination and intimidation at the polls, threats of violence directed at election officials and poll workers, and election fraud.  The Department will address these violations wherever they occur.  The Department’s longstanding Election Day Program furthers these goals and seeks to ensure public confidence in the electoral process by providing local points of contact within the Department for the public to report possible federal election law violations.

    Federal law protects against such crimes as threatening violence against election officials or staff, intimidating or bribing voters, buying and selling votes, impersonating voters, altering vote tallies, stuffing ballot boxes, and marking ballots for voters against their wishes or without their input.  It also contains special protections for the rights of voters, and provides that they can vote free from interference, including intimidation, and other acts designed to prevent or discourage people from voting or voting for the candidate of their choice.  The Voting Rights Act protects the right of voters to mark their own ballot or to be assisted by a person of their choice (where voters need assistance because of disability or inability to read or write in English).

    # # #

     

    MIL Security OSI –

  • MIL-OSI Security: Federal Indictment Charges Three Men With Chicago Carjacking

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    CHICAGO — A federal grand jury has indicted three men on carjacking and firearm charges for allegedly violently stealing a vehicle in Chicago.

    MARQUELL DAVIS, 22, RAMONE BRADLEY, 26, and EDMUND SINGLETON, 34, all of Chicago, conspired to take an Infiniti Q50 and a BMW X6 on Nov. 3, 2022, according to an indictment returned in U.S. District Court in Chicago.  Davis carried a firearm while the trio carjacked the Infiniti’s driver at a gas station in the Roseland neighborhood of Chicago, the indictment states.  Later that day, Bradley and Davis carried firearms while they attempted to carjack the BMW at a gas station in Chicago’s Douglas neighborhood, the indictment states.  Davis took the BMW driver’s car key, but he and Bradley were not successful in stealing the vehicle, the indictment states.

    All three defendants are currently in law enforcement custody.  Bradley faces a maximum sentence of 30 years in federal prison.  Davis and Singleton face mandatory minimum sentences of seven years and a maximum of life. Arraignments are scheduled for Nov. 5, 2024, at 1:15 p.m., before U.S. District Judge Matthew F. Kennelly.

    The indictment was announced by Morris Pasqual, Acting United States Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois, Douglas S. DePodesta, Special Agent-in-Charge of the Chicago Field Office of the FBI, and Larry Snelling, Superintendent of the Chicago Police Department.  The government is represented by Assistant U.S. Attorney Margaret A. Steindorf.

    The public is reminded that an indictment is not evidence of guilt.  The defendants are presumed innocent and entitled to a fair trial at which the government has the burden of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

    MIL Security OSI –

  • MIL-OSI Security: Jefferson County Man Sentenced to 10 Years in Prison for Attempting to Meet a Minor for Sex

    Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) State Crime Alerts (b)

    BIRMINGHAM, Ala. – A Jefferson County man was sentenced today on a charge of attempted coercion and enticement of a minor, announced U.S. Attorney Prim F. Escalona and Federal Bureau of Investigation Special Agent in Charge Carlton L. Peeples.

    U.S. District Court Judge Anna Manasco sentenced Robert Elton Trimble, 38, of Kimberly, to 120 months in prison, followed by a life term of supervised release.  In June, Trimble pleaded guilty to one count of attempting to coerce or entice a minor to engage in sexual activity. 

    According to court documents, on October 16, 2023, Trimble made contact with an individual he believed was a 15-year-old girl on a social networking app. After learning her age on day one, Trimble continued to communicate with the “child,” asking her questions about school, telling her about his work, and requesting photos.  Within two weeks, Trimble turned their conversation sexual by asking the “child” about her sexual experiences and discussing plans to meet her. On November 21, 2023, Trimble arrived for the meeting and was arrested.  Only then did he discover that he actually had been communicating with an undercover officer.  

    FBI Birmingham’s Child Exploitation and Human Trafficking Task Force investigated the case along with the Homewood Police Department. Assistant U.S. Attorney R. Leann White prosecuted the case.

    The U.S. Attorney’s Office and the National Children’s Advocacy Center have partnered and released a digital series to educate parents and caretakers about sextortion and how they can help prevent kids and teens from being victims. This series offers three-to-five-minute videos about current online safety topics and provides essential information about the true dangers of online activities.

    The videos can be accessed from the following locations:

    https://www.nationalcac.org/sextortion-prevention/

    https://www.youtube.com/@nationalcac

    If you suspect or become aware of possible sexual exploitation of a child, please contact law enforcement. To alert the FBI Birmingham Office, call 205-326-6166. Reports can also be filed with the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children or online at www.cybertipline.org.

    This case was brought as part of Project Safe Childhood, a nationwide initiative launched by the Department of Justice in May 2006 to combat the epidemic of child sexual exploitation and abuse.  Led by U.S. Attorneys’ Offices and the Criminal Division’s Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, Project Safe Childhood marshals federal, state, and local resources to better locate, apprehend and prosecute individuals who exploit children via the Internet, and to identify and rescue victims.  For more information about Project Safe Childhood, please visit www.projectsafechildhood.gov.

    MIL Security OSI –

  • MIL-OSI Security: US Attorney Announces District Election Officer for Alaska Ahead of Election Day

    Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) State Crime Alerts (b)

    ANCHORAGE, Alaska – United States Attorney S. Lane Tucker announced today that Assistant United States Attorney (AUSA) Morgan J. Walker will lead the efforts of her Office in connection with the Justice Department’s nationwide Election Day Program for the upcoming November 5, 2024, general election. AUSA Walker has been appointed to serve as the District Election Officer (DEO) for the District of Alaska, and in that capacity is responsible for overseeing the District’s handling of election day complaints of voting rights concerns, threats of violence to election officials or staff, and election fraud, in consultation with Justice Department Headquarters in Washington.

    United States Attorney Tucker said, “Every citizen must be able to vote without interference or discrimination and to have that vote counted in a fair and free election. Similarly, election officials and staff must be able to serve without being subject to unlawful threats of violence. The Department of Justice will always work tirelessly to protect the integrity of the election process.”

    The Department of Justice has an important role in deterring and combatting discrimination and intimidation at the polls, threats of violence directed at election officials and poll workers, and election fraud. The Department will address these violations wherever they occur. The Department’s longstanding Election Day Program furthers these goals and also seeks to ensure public confidence in the electoral process by providing local points of contact within the Department for the public to report possible federal election law violations.

    Federal law protects against such crimes as threatening violence against election officials or staff, intimidating or bribing voters, buying and selling votes, impersonating voters, altering vote tallies, stuffing ballot boxes, and marking ballots for voters against their wishes or without their input. It also contains special protections for the rights of voters, and provides that they can vote free from interference, including intimidation, and other acts designed to prevent or discourage people from voting or voting for the candidate of their choice. The Voting Rights Act protects the right of voters to mark their own ballot or to be assisted by a person of their choice (where voters need assistance because of disability or inability to read or write in English).

    United States Attorney Tucker stated that: “The right to vote is the cornerstone of American democracy.  We all must ensure that those who are entitled to vote can exercise that right if they choose, and that those who seek to corrupt it are brought to justice. In order to respond to complaints of voting rights concerns and election fraud during the upcoming election, and to ensure that such complaints are directed to the appropriate authorities, AUSA/DEO Walker will be on duty in this District while the polls are open.”

    In addition, the FBI will have special agents available in each field office and resident agency throughout the country to receive allegations of election fraud and other election abuses on election day. The public can contact the FBI at 1-800-CALL-FBI or tips.fbi.gov, or contact the local FBI Anchorage Field Office at (907) 276-4441.

    Complaints about possible violations of the federal voting rights laws can be made directly to the Civil Rights Division in Washington, DC by complaint form at https://civilrights.justice.gov/ or by phone at 800-253-3931.

    United States Attorney Tucker said, “Ensuring free and fair elections depends in large part on the assistance of the American electorate. It is important that those who have specific information about voting rights concerns or election fraud make that information available to the Department of Justice.”

    Please note, however, in the case of a crime of violence or intimidation, please call 911 immediately and before contacting federal authorities. State and local police have primary jurisdiction over polling places, and almost always have faster reaction capacity in an emergency.

    ###

    MIL Security OSI –

  • MIL-OSI Security: Arizona Doctor Sentenced to Prison for Health Care Fraud

    Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) State Crime Alerts (b)

    TUCSON, Ariz. – Linh Cao Nguyen, M.D., 51, of Peoria, was sentenced last week by United States District Judge John C. Hinderaker to 24 months in prison. Nguyen pleaded guilty to Health Care Fraud on March 19, 2024.

    Over the course of several years, Nguyen engaged in a scheme to defraud various health care benefit programs, including Medicare, TRICARE, AHCCCS, Blue Cross Blue Shield, and UnitedHealthcare. As part of his scheme, Nguyen knowingly caused the submission of thousands of false billing claims. Nguyen also falsely created patient records to conceal and avoid detection of his fraudulent scheme. The fraudulent claims identified a medical doctor as the treating provider when, in fact, another provider such as a nurse practitioner, social worker, unlicensed psychology intern, or wound care nurse provided the service independently. By billing the medical service as if it were provided by a physician, Nguyen falsely inflated the amount his company was to be paid for the service.

    The total loss to the insurance companies from Nguyen’s scheme was approximately $3.7 million. As part of his sentence, Nguyen was ordered to pay over $1.1 million in restitution to the private insurance companies. Nguyen also was required to pay over $2.5 million to the government in a separate civil agreement.

    The United States Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the Department of Defense Office of Inspector General, Defense Criminal Investigative Service conducted the investigation in this case. The United States Attorney’s Office, District of Arizona, Tucson, handled the prosecution.
     

    CASE NUMBER:           CR-21-02716-TUC-JCH
    RELEASE NUMBER:    2024-144_Nguyen

     

    # # #

    For more information on the U.S. Attorney’s Office, District of Arizona, visit http://www.justice.gov/usao/az/
    Follow the U.S. Attorney’s Office, District of Arizona, on X @USAO_AZ for the latest news.

    MIL Security OSI –

  • MIL-OSI Security: Los Angeles County Man Sentenced to 12 Years and Nine Months in Prison for Child Exploitation Conspiracy with Yuba County Man

    Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) State Crime Alerts (b)

    SACRAMENTO, Calif. — Pedro Luis Millan, aka Peter Millan, 38, of Montebello, was sentenced today by U.S. District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta to 12 years and nine months in prison for conspiracy to sexually exploit a child, U.S. Attorney Phillip A. Talbert announced.

    According to court documents, in May 2021, Millan conspired with Brent Hooton, 51, of Marysville, to produce an image of a severely autistic child who was under the age of 12 engaged in sexually explicit conduct. Hooton produced the image and then sent it to Millan and other users over the Kik messaging app. Millan received that image, as well as additional sexual abuse images of the same child victim, from Hooton over the Kik app.

    This case was the product of an investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Assistant U.S. Attorney Denise N. Yasinow prosecuted the case.

    On Aug. 27, 2024, Hooton was sentenced to 27 years in prison for sexual exploitation of a child and distribution of child pornography.

    This case was brought as part of Project Safe Childhood, a nationwide initiative launched in May 2006 by the Department of Justice to combat the growing epidemic of child sexual exploitation and abuse. Led by the United States Attorneys’ Offices and the Criminal Division’s Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, Project Safe Childhood marshals federal, state, and local resources to locate, apprehend, and prosecute those who sexually exploit children, and to identify and rescue victims. For more information about Project Safe Childhood, please visit www.usdoj.gov/psc. Click on the “resources” tab for information about internet-safety education.

    MIL Security OSI –

  • MIL-OSI Security: Alleged Bay Area Fentanyl Distributor Extradited From Honduras

    Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) State Crime Alerts (b)

    OAKLAND – The government of Honduras extradited Javier Marin-Gonzales, a Honduran national, to the United States this week to appear on charges stemming from his alleged involvement in the distribution of fentanyl in the San Francisco Bay Area. The extradition marks the fifth extradition of an alleged drug distributor from Honduras to the Northern District of California this year.

    On Aug. 2, 2023, a federal grand jury indicted Marin-Gonzales, 25, at the time a resident of Oakland, in connection with the alleged distribution of fentanyl on three separate occasions.   The investigation in this case led to charges against multiple East Bay-based defendants who allegedly traveled into the Tenderloin neighborhood of San Francisco to engage in drug dealing.

    According to court documents, at the time of the indictment, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) learned that Marin-Gonzales had traveled back to Honduras.  The Justice Department’s Office of International Affairs worked with Honduran authorities, the FBI, and the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to secure the arrest and extradition of Marin-Gonzales. Marin-Gonzales arrived back in the United States on Oct. 23, 2024.  He appeared before U.S. Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore today for arraignment on the indictment and further proceedings.  A detention hearing for Marin-Gonzales is scheduled for Oct. 30, 2024.

    “We appreciate our law enforcement partners’ efforts, here and abroad, to bring to justice those who are charged with peddling deadly drugs in our communities,” said United States Attorney Ismail J. Ramsey.

    “This arrest and extradition marks a significant step in our ongoing fight against the distribution of dangerous drugs like fentanyl,” said FBI Special Agent in Charge Robert Tripp. “By bringing Marin-Gonzales to face justice in the United States, we are sending a clear message: those who profit from the trafficking of deadly substances will be held accountable, no matter where they operate. The FBI remains committed to working with our domestic and international partners to disrupt drug networks that threaten the safety and well-being of our communities.”

    “We remain steadfast in our commitment to hold accountable drug traffickers operating in the Tenderloin,” said DEA Special Agent in Charge Bob P. Beris. “The extradition of Marin-Gonzales is another example of how strong global partnerships keep our communities safe.”

    The indictment charges Marin-Gonzales with the distribution of 40 grams or more of fentanyl, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B)(vi).

    An indictment merely alleges that crimes have been committed, and all defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.  If convicted, Defendant faces a maximum sentence of 40 years’ imprisonment, a fine of $5,000,000, a lifetime of supervised release, and a $100 special assessment.  However, any sentence following a conviction would be imposed by a court only after considerations of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and the federal statute governing the imposition of a sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3553.

    The announcement was made by U.S. Attorney Ismail J. Ramsey, FBI Special Agent in Charge Robert Tripp, and DEA Special Agent in Charge Bob P. Beris.

    This prosecution is part of an Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Forces (OCDETF) investigation.  OCDETF identifies, disrupts, and dismantles the highest-level drug traffickers, money launderers, gangs, and transnational criminal organizations that threaten the United States by using a prosecutor-led, intelligence-driven, multi-agency approach that leverages the strengths of federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies against criminal networks.  Assistant U.S. Attorney Charles Bisesto is prosecuting the case with the assistance of Sara Slattery and Andy Ding.  The prosecution is the result of an investigation by the FBI SAFE Streets Task Force, DEA, and the Concord Police Department.
     

    MIL Security OSI –

  • MIL-OSI Security: Return to Nature Funeral Home Owners Plead Guilty in Federal Court

    Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) State Crime Alerts (b)

    DENVER – The United States Attorney’s Office for the District of Colorado announces that Jon Hallford, 44, and Carie Hallford, 47, pleaded guilty today to one count each of conspiracy to commit wire fraud.

    According to the plea agreements for each, the Hallfords were the co-owners of Return to Nature Funeral Home, which operated both in the Colorado Springs area and in Penrose, Colorado. In October 2023, residents in the Penrose area reported a foul odor emanating from the Return to Nature facility. After obtaining a search warrant, FBI, CBI, and local law enforcement investigators found the remains of approximately 190 deceased persons inside the building in various states of decomposition.  Some of the remains discovered had dates of death as far back as 2019.  As part of their fraud scheme, the Hallfords misled customers of the funeral home into believing that the remains of their loved ones would be buried or cremated per their wishes and the terms of the parties’ contracts.

    As part of their plea agreements, the Hallfords also admitted that they conspired together to defraud the U.S. Small Business Administration of over $800,000 in COVID-19 pandemic relief funds, which they obtained under the government’s Economic Injury Disaster Loan program.

    Sentencing will be held at a later date. Each defendant faces up to twenty years in federal prison.

    United States District Court Judge Nina Y. Wang presided over the hearing. The FBI Denver Field Office and The United States Small Business Administration Office of Inspector General investigated the case.  Several other state and local law enforcement agencies including the Colorado Bureau of Investigation, the Colorado Springs Police Department, the El Paso County Coroner’s Office, the Fremont County Sheriff’s Office, and the Fremont County Coroner’s Office have made significant contributions to this case. The prosecution was handled by Assistant United States Attorneys Tim Neff and Craig Fansler.

    MIL Security OSI –