Intelligence – Page 144

MIL-OSI: SiriusPoint reports tenth consecutive quarter of underwriting profits and strong net income of $58m

Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

HAMILTON, Bermuda, May 05, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — SiriusPoint Ltd. (“SiriusPoint” or the “Company”) (NYSE:SPNT) today announced results for its first quarter ended March 31, 2025

Combined ratio of 95.4% in the first quarter for Core business with underwriting income of $29 million
Net premiums written growth of 20%, outpacing gross premiums written growth of 12% in the quarter for Core business, with strong growth from Insurance & Services
First quarter return on equity of 12.9%, within 12-15% ‘across the cycle’ return on equity target range
$59 million net impact from California Wildfires in the quarter, below guided range from the fourth quarter
Book value per diluted common share (ex. AOCI) of $15.15, up 3.5% in the quarter. Balance sheet remains strong with Q1’25 BSCR estimate at 227%
During the quarter, AM Best and Fitch affirmed our ratings and revised our outlook to Positive from Stable

Scott Egan, Chief Executive Officer, said: “2025 has got off to a strong start. Our aim to deliver stable and consistent earnings can be seen with our first quarter return on equity of 12.9%, well within our 12-15% target range as our diverse portfolio performed well against the backdrop of elevated natural catastrophe losses.

Our growth momentum continues, with Core gross premiums written growing by 12% in the quarter, while net premiums written increased at a faster pace of 20%, as we seek to retain a greater proportion of our increasingly profitable book. The Core underwriting result saw improvements across multiple fronts, with the attritional loss ratio, acquisition cost ratio, and underwriting expense ratios all decreasing and contributing to a 3.0 point reduction in total across these areas.

Our earnings per share of $0.49 was flat to prior year despite lower net income, demonstrating the significant accretion benefits now being derived from the previously announced share repurchases. Our strong earnings resulted in an increase to book value of 5% in the quarter.

Our focus will be to maintain this momentum and continue to deliver and improve throughout 2025. We are pleased to see our outlook move to Positive from Stable this year for both AM Best and Fitch. These are important proof points of our progress.”

First Quarter 2025 Highlights

Net income attributable to SiriusPoint common shareholders of $57.6 million, or $0.49 per diluted common share
Core income of $47.4 million, including underwriting income of $28.5 million, Core combined ratio of 95.4%
Core net services fee income of $19.0 million, with service margin of 30.6%
Net investment income of $71.2 million and total investment result of $70.9 million
Book value per diluted common share increased $0.77 per share, or 5.3%, from December 31, 2024 to $15.37
Annualized return on average common equity of 12.9%

Key Financial Metrics

The following table shows certain key financial metrics for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024:

		2025			2024
	($ in millions, except for per share data and ratios)
Combined ratio		91.4	%		84.9	%
Core underwriting income (1)	$	28.5		$	44.3
Core net services income (1)	$	18.9		$	18.1
Core income (1)	$	47.4		$	62.4
Core combined ratio (1)		95.4	%		91.4	%
Annualized return on average common shareholders’ equity attributable to SiriusPoint common shareholders		12.9	%		15.4	%
Book value per common share (2)	$	15.73		$	14.92
Book value per diluted common share (2)	$	15.37		$	14.60
Book value per diluted common share ex. AOCI (1) (2)	$	15.15		$	14.64
Tangible book value per diluted common share (1) (2)	$	14.21		$	13.42

(1)

Core underwriting income, Core net services income, Core income and Core combined ratio are non-GAAP financial measures. See definitions in “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” and reconciliations in “Segment Reporting.” Book value per diluted common share ex. AOCI and tangible book value per diluted common share are non-GAAP financial measures. See definition and reconciliation in “Non-GAAP Financial Measures.”

(2)

Prior year comparatives represent amounts as of December 31, 2024.

First Quarter 2025 Summary

Consolidated underwriting income for the three months ended March 31, 2025 was $54.1 million compared to $89.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2024. The decrease was primarily driven by increased catastrophe losses from the California wildfires, partially offset by increased favorable development in Property, mainly from reserve releases relating to prior year’s catastrophe events, and in A&H, due to lower than expected reported attritional losses.

Reportable Segments

The determination of our reportable segments is based on the manner in which management monitors the performance of our operations, which consist of two reportable segments – Reinsurance and Insurance & Services.

Collectively, the sum of our two segments, Reinsurance and Insurance & Services, constitute our “Core” results. Core underwriting income, Core net services income, Core income and Core combined ratio are non-GAAP financial measures. See reconciliations in “Segment Reporting”. We believe it is useful to review Core results as it better reflects how management views the business and reflects our decision to exit the runoff business. The sum of Core results and Corporate results are equal to the consolidated results of operations.

Core Premium Volume

Gross premiums written increased by $109.2 million, or 12.4%, to $989.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025 compared to $880.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2024. Net premiums earned increased by $108.0 million, or 20.9%, to $625.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025 compared to $517.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2024. The increases in premium volume were primarily driven by our Insurance & Services segment, including growth across A&H, expansion of Surety within our Other Specialties business line and continued strategic organic and new program growth in our international business.

Core Results

Core results for the three months ended March 31, 2025 included income of $47.4 million compared to $62.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2024. Income for the three months ended March 31, 2025 consists of underwriting income of $28.5 million (95.4% combined ratio) and net services income of $18.9 million, compared to underwriting income of $44.3 million (91.4% combined ratio) and net services income of $18.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2024. The decrease in net underwriting results was primarily driven by increased catastrophe losses, partially offset by increased favorable development and lower attritional losses.

Catastrophe losses for the three months ended March 31, 2025 were $67.9 million, or 10.9 percentage points on the combined ratio, primarily from the California wildfires, compared to minimal losses for the three months ended March 31, 2024. Losses incurred included $34.3 million of favorable prior year loss reserve development for the three months ended March 31, 2025 primarily driven by favorable development in Property, mainly from reserve releases relating to prior year’s catastrophe events, as well as favorable development in A&H, due to lower than expected reported attritional losses, compared to $8.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2024 driven by decreased ultimate losses in the Credit reinsurance portfolio.

Net services income remained stable for the three months ended March 31, 2025 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2024. Service margin, which is calculated as Net service fee income as a percentage of services revenues, increased to 30.6% for the three months ended March 31, 2025 from 30.1% for the three months ended March 31, 2024.

Reinsurance Segment

Reinsurance gross premiums written were $354.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025, an decrease of $1.6 million, or 0.4%, compared to the three months ended March 31, 2024, primarily driven by reduced premiums written in Casualty reflecting underwriting actions to improve profitability, partially offset by increased reinstatement premiums of $8.9 million related to our Property Catastrophe business.

Reinsurance generated underwriting income of $8.4 million (97.1% combined ratio) for the three months ended March 31, 2025, compared to underwriting income of $39.9 million (84.2% combined ratio) for the three months ended March 31, 2024. The decrease in net underwriting results was primarily driven by increased catastrophe losses of $63.1 million, or 21.8 percentage points on the combined ratio, primarily from the California wildfires, compared to minimal losses for the three months ended March 31, 2024. This was partially offset by increased favorable prior year loss reserve development of $31.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025 primarily driven by favorable development in Property, mainly from reserve releases relating to prior year’s catastrophe events, compared to $10.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2024 primarily driven by decreased ultimate losses in the Credit reinsurance portfolio.

Insurance & Services Segment

Insurance & Services gross premiums written were $635.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025, an increase of $110.8 million, or 21.1%, compared to the three months ended March 31, 2024, primarily driven by growth across A&H, expansion of Surety within our Other Specialties business line and continued strategic organic and new program growth in our international business.

Insurance & Services generated segment income of $39.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025, compared to $22.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2024. Segment income for the three months ended March 31, 2025 consists of underwriting income of $20.1 million (94.0% combined ratio) and net services income of $18.9 million, compared to underwriting income of $4.4 million (98.4% combined ratio) and net services income of $18.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2024. The improvement in underwriting results was primarily driven by our decreased loss ratio mainly from lower attritional losses, as well as net favorable prior year loss reserve development of $2.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025, mainly in A&H, compared to net adverse prior year loss reserve development of $2.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2024.

Investments

Net investment income and net realized and unrealized investment gains (losses) for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024 were mainly driven by interest income of $63.4 million and $76.9 million, respectively, on our debt securities and short-term investments. The decrease is driven by a lower asset base as of March 31, 2025 after executing various share repurchase transactions in 2024 and 2025.

Webcast Details

The Company will hold a webcast to discuss its first quarter 2025 results at 8:30 a.m. Eastern Time on May 6, 2025. The webcast of the conference call will be available over the Internet from the Company’s website at www.siriuspt.com under the “Investor Relations” section. Participants should follow the instructions provided on the website to download and install any necessary audio applications. The conference call will be available by dialing 1-877-451-6152 (domestic) or 1-201-389-0879 (international). Participants should ask for the SiriusPoint Ltd. first quarter 2025 earnings call.

The online replay will be available on the Company’s website immediately following the call at www.siriuspt.com under the “Investor Relations” section.

Safe Harbor Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This press release includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties, many of which may be beyond the Company’s control. The Company cautions you that the forward-looking information presented in this press release is not a guarantee of future events, and that actual events may differ materially from those made in or suggested by the forward-looking information contained in this press release. In addition, forward-looking statements generally can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “believes,” “intends,” “seeks,” “anticipates,” “aims,” “plans,” “targets,” “estimates,” “expects,” “assumes,” “continues,” “guidance,” “should,” “could,” “will,” “may” and the negative of these or similar terms and phrases. Specific forward-looking statements in this press release include, but are not limited to, statements regarding the trend of our performance as compared to the previous guidance, the current insurtech market trends, our ability to generate shareholder value, and whether we will continue to have momentum in our business in the future. Actual events, results and outcomes may differ materially from the Company’s expectations due to a variety of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors. Among the risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ from those described in the forward-looking statements are the following: our ability to execute on our strategic transformation, including re-underwriting to reduce volatility and improve underwriting performance, de-risking our investment portfolio, and transforming our business; the impact of unpredictable catastrophic events, including uncertainties with respect to current and future COVID-19 losses across many classes of insurance business and the amount of insurance losses that may ultimately be ceded to the reinsurance market, supply chain issues, labor shortages and related increased costs, changing interest rates and equity market volatility; inadequacy of loss and loss adjustment expense reserves, the lack of available capital, and periods characterized by excess underwriting capacity and unfavorable premium rates; the performance of financial markets, impact of inflation and interest rates, and foreign currency fluctuations; our ability to compete successfully in the insurance and reinsurance market and the effect of consolidation in the insurance and reinsurance industry; technology breaches or failures, including those resulting from a malicious cyber-attack on us, our business partners or service providers; the effects of global climate change, including wildfires, and increased severity and frequency of weather-related natural disasters and catastrophes and increased coastal flooding in many geographic areas; geopolitical uncertainty, including the ongoing conflicts in Europe and the Middle East and the new presidential administration in the U.S.; global economic uncertainty caused by the imposition and/or announcement of tariffs imposed on the import of certain goods into the U.S. from various countries which may have unpredictable consequences including, but not limited to, inflation or trade wars, potential impact on the Company’s credit and mortgage business and potential increase in credit spread which could impact the Company’s short-term capital and liquidity; our ability to retain key senior management and key employees; a downgrade or withdrawal of our financial ratings; fluctuations in our results of operations; legal restrictions on certain of SiriusPoint’s insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries’ ability to pay dividends and other distributions to SiriusPoint; the outcome of legal and regulatory proceedings and regulatory constraints on our business; reduced returns or losses in SiriusPoint’s investment portfolio; our exposure or potential exposure to corporate income tax in Bermuda and the E.U., U.S. federal income and withholding taxes and our significant deferred tax assets, which could become devalued if we do not generate future taxable income or applicable corporate tax rates are reduced; risks associated with delegating authority to third party managing general agents; future strategic transactions such as acquisitions, dispositions, investments, mergers or joint ventures; and other risks and factors listed under “Risk Factors” in the Company’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K and other subsequent periodic reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date made and the Company undertakes no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Financial Metrics

In presenting SiriusPoint’s results, management has included financial measures that are not calculated under standards or rules that comprise accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”). SiriusPoint’s management uses this information in its internal analysis of results and believes that this information may be informative to investors in gauging the quality of SiriusPoint’s financial performance, identifying trends in our results and providing meaningful period-to-period comparisons. Core underwriting income, Core net services income, Core income, and Core combined ratio are non-GAAP financial measures. Management believes it is useful to review Core results as it better reflects how management views the business and reflects the Company’s decision to exit the runoff business. Book value per diluted common share excluding accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (“AOCI”) and tangible book value per diluted common share, as presented, are non-GAAP financial measures and the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measure is book value per common share. Management believes it is useful to exclude AOCI because it may fluctuate significantly between periods based on movements in interest and currency rates. Management believes the effects of intangible assets are not indicative of underlying underwriting results or trends and make book value comparisons to less acquisitive peer companies less meaningful. Reconciliations of such non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP figures are included in the attached financial information in accordance with Regulation G and Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K, as applicable.

About the Company

SiriusPoint is a global underwriter of insurance and reinsurance providing solutions to clients and brokers around the world. Bermuda-headquartered with offices in New York, London, Stockholm and other locations, we are listed on the New York Stock Exchange (SPNT). We have licenses to write Property & Casualty and Accident & Health insurance and reinsurance globally. Our offering and distribution capabilities are strengthened by a portfolio of strategic partnerships with Managing General Agents and Program Administrators. With approximately $2.7 billion total capital, SiriusPoint’s operating companies have a financial strength rating of A- (Excellent) from AM Best, S&P and Fitch, and A3 from Moody’s. For more information, please visit www.siriuspt.com.

Contacts

Investor Relations
Liam Blackledge – Investor Relations and Strategy Manager
Liam.Blackledge@siriuspt.com
+ 44 203 772 3082

Media
Natalie King – Global Head of Marketing and External Communications
Natalie.King@siriuspt.com
+ 44 770 728 8817


SIRIUSPOINT LTD. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED) As of March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024 (expressed in millions of U.S. dollars, except per share and share amounts)

	March 31, 2025		December 31, 2024
Assets
Debt securities, available for sale, at fair value, net of allowance for credit losses of $0.0 (2024 – $1.1) (cost – $4,617.0; 2024 – $5,143.8)	$	4,635.2	$	5,131.0
Debt securities, trading, at fair value (cost – $140.9; 2024 – $187.3)		117.6		162.2
Short-term investments, at fair value (cost – $48.2; 2024 – $95.3)		48.2		95.8
Other long-term investments, at fair value (cost – $437.9; 2024 – $438.2) (includes related party investments at fair value of $220.1 (2024 – $217.2))		317.7		316.5
Total investments		5,118.7		5,705.5
Cash and cash equivalents		740.3		682.0
Restricted cash and cash equivalents		184.9		212.6
Due from brokers		18.8		11.2
Interest and dividends receivable		42.1		44.0
Insurance and reinsurance balances receivable, net		2,240.8		2,054.4
Deferred acquisition costs, net		369.3		327.5
Unearned premiums ceded		514.3		463.9
Loss and loss adjustment expenses recoverable, net		2,335.7		2,315.3
Deferred tax asset		293.3		297.0
Intangible assets		137.9		140.8
Other assets		284.4		270.7
Total assets	$	12,280.5	$	12,524.9
Liabilities
Loss and loss adjustment expense reserves	$	5,762.6	$	5,653.9
Unearned premium reserves		1,816.8		1,639.2
Reinsurance balances payable		1,707.5		1,781.6
Deposit liabilities		15.6		17.4
Deferred gain on retroactive reinsurance		6.6		8.5
Debt		663.5		639.1
Due to brokers		6.6		18.0
Deferred tax liability		94.2		76.2
Share repurchase liability		—		483.0
Other liabilities		180.4		269.2
Total liabilities		10,253.8		10,586.1
Commitments and contingent liabilities
Shareholders’ equity
Series B preference shares (par value $0.10; authorized and issued: 8,000,000)		200.0		200.0
Common shares (issued and outstanding: 116,020,526; 2023 – 116,429,057)		11.6		11.6
Additional paid-in capital		944.7		945.0
Retained earnings		842.5		784.9
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax		26.4		(4.1	)
Shareholders’ equity attributable to SiriusPoint shareholders		2,025.2		1,937.4
Noncontrolling interests		1.5		1.4
Total shareholders’ equity		2,026.7		1,938.8
Total liabilities, noncontrolling interests and shareholders’ equity	$	12,280.5	$	12,524.9


SIRIUSPOINT LTD. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (UNAUDITED) For the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024 (expressed in millions of U.S. dollars, except per share and share amounts)

		2025			2024
Revenues
Net premiums earned	$	626.7		$	593.8
Net investment income		71.2			78.8
Net realized and unrealized investment gains (losses)		(0.3	)		1.0
Net investment income and net realized and unrealized investment gains (losses)		70.9			79.8
Other revenues		29.7			27.8
Loss on settlement and change in fair value of liability-classified capital instruments		—			(15.9	)
Total revenues		727.3			685.5
Expenses
Loss and loss adjustment expenses incurred, net		401.8			317.5
Acquisition costs, net		129.7			144.9
Other underwriting expenses		41.1			41.8
Net corporate and other expenses		60.6			56.0
Intangible asset amortization		2.9			2.9
Interest expense		18.1			20.5
Foreign exchange gains		(2.2	)		(3.7	)
Total expenses		652.0			579.9
Income before income tax expense		75.3			105.6
Income tax expense		(13.3	)		(9.7	)
Net income		62.0			95.9
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		(0.4	)		(1.1	)
Net income available to SiriusPoint		61.6			94.8
Dividends on Series B preference shares		(4.0	)		(4.0	)
Net income available to SiriusPoint common shareholders	$	57.6		$	90.8
Earnings per share available to SiriusPoint common shareholders
Basic earnings per share available to SiriusPoint common shareholders	$	0.50		$	0.50
Diluted earnings per share available to SiriusPoint common shareholders	$	0.49		$	0.49
Weighted average number of common shares used in the determination of earnings per share
Basic		115,975,961			168,934,114
Diluted		118,555,166			174,380,963


SIRIUSPOINT LTD. SEGMENT REPORTING

	Three months ended March 31, 2025
	Reinsurance			Insurance & Services			Core			Eliminations ⁽²⁾			Corporate			Segment Measure Reclass			Total
Gross premiums written	$	354.8		$	635.1		$	989.9		$	—		$	(5.2	)	$	—		$	984.7
Net premiums written		268.5			483.5			752.0			—			(9.0	)		—			743.0
Net premiums earned		289.6			336.2			625.8			—			0.9			—			626.7
Loss and loss adjustment expenses incurred, net		195.3			209.9			405.2			(2.0	)		(1.4	)		—			401.8
Acquisition costs, net		67.1			87.3			154.4			(28.0	)		3.3			—			129.7
Other underwriting expenses		18.8			18.9			37.7			—			3.4			—			41.1
Underwriting income (loss)		8.4			20.1			28.5			30.0			(4.4	)		—			54.1
Services revenues		—			62.1			62.1			(30.2	)		—			(31.9	)		—
Services expenses		—			43.1			43.1			—			—			(43.1	)		—
Net services fee income		—			19.0			19.0			(30.2	)		—			11.2			—
Services noncontrolling income		—			(0.1	)		(0.1	)		—			—			0.1			—
Net services income		—			18.9			18.9			(30.2	)		—			11.3			—
Segment income (loss)		8.4			39.0			47.4			(0.2	)		(4.4	)		11.3			54.1
Net investment income														71.2			—			71.2
Net realized and unrealized investment losses														(0.3	)		—			(0.3	)
Other revenues														(2.2	)		31.9			29.7
Net corporate and other expenses														(17.5	)		(43.1	)		(60.6	)
Intangible asset amortization														(2.9	)		—			(2.9	)
Interest expense														(18.1	)		—			(18.1	)
Foreign exchange gains														2.2			—			2.2
Income before income tax expense	$	8.4		$	39.0			47.4			(0.2	)		28.0			0.1			75.3
Income tax expense								—			—			(13.3	)		—			(13.3	)
Net income								47.4			(0.2	)		14.7			0.1			62.0
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest								—			—			(0.3	)		(0.1	)		(0.4	)
Net income available to SiriusPoint							$	47.4		$	(0.2	)	$	14.4		$	—		$	61.6

Attritional losses	$	164.0		$	207.6		$	371.6		$	(2.0	)	$	(1.5	)	$	—		$	368.1
Catastrophe losses		63.1			4.8			67.9			—			—			—			67.9
Prior year loss reserve development		(31.8	)		(2.5	)		(34.3	)		—			0.1			—			(34.2	)
Loss and loss adjustment expenses incurred, net	$	195.3		$	209.9		$	405.2		$	(2.0	)	$	(1.4	)	$	—		$	401.8

Underwriting Ratios: ⁽¹⁾
Attritional loss ratio		56.6	%		61.7	%		59.3	%											58.8	%
Catastrophe loss ratio		21.8	%		1.4	%		10.9	%											10.8	%
Prior year loss development ratio	(11.0)%			(0.7)%			(5.5)%												(5.5)%
Loss ratio		67.4	%		62.4	%		64.7	%											64.1	%
Acquisition cost ratio		23.2	%		26.0	%		24.7	%											20.7	%
Other underwriting expenses ratio		6.5	%		5.6	%		6.0	%											6.6	%
Combined ratio		97.1	%		94.0	%		95.4	%											91.4	%

(1)	Underwriting ratios are calculated by dividing the related expense by net premiums earned.
(2)	Insurance & Services MGAs recognize fees for service using revenue from contracts with customers accounting standards, whereas insurance companies recognize acquisition expenses using insurance contract accounting standards. While ultimate revenues and expenses recognized will match, there will be recognition timing differences based on the different accounting standards.

	Three months ended March 31, 2024
	Reinsurance			Insurance & Services			Core			Eliminations ⁽²⁾			Corporate			Segment Measure Reclass			Total
Gross premiums written	$	356.4		$	524.3		$	880.7		$	—		$	25.9		$	—		$	906.6
Net premiums written		290.1			337.1			627.2			—			12.1			—			639.3
Net premiums earned		253.6			264.2			517.8			—			76.0			—			593.8
Loss and loss adjustment expenses incurred, net		124.6			176.5			301.1			(1.4	)		17.8			—			317.5
Acquisition costs, net		69.8			65.2			135.0			(33.2	)		43.1			—			144.9
Other underwriting expenses		19.3			18.1			37.4			—			4.4			—			41.8
Underwriting income		39.9			4.4			44.3			34.6			10.7			—			89.6
Services revenues		—			65.8			65.8			(37.1	)		—			(28.7	)		—
Services expenses		—			46.0			46.0			—			—			(46.0	)		—
Net services fee income		—			19.8			19.8			(37.1	)		—			17.3			—
Services noncontrolling income		—			(1.7	)		(1.7	)		—			—			1.7			—
Net services income		—			18.1			18.1			(37.1	)		—			19.0			—
Segment income		39.9			22.5			62.4			(2.5	)		10.7			19.0			89.6
Net investment income														78.8			—			78.8
Net realized and unrealized investment gains														1.0			—			1.0
Other revenues														(0.9	)		28.7			27.8
Loss on settlement and change in fair value of liability-classified capital instruments														(15.9	)		—			(15.9	)
Net corporate and other expenses														(10.0	)		(46.0	)		(56.0	)
Intangible asset amortization														(2.9	)		—			(2.9	)
Interest expense														(20.5	)		—			(20.5	)
Foreign exchange gains														3.7			—			3.7
Income before income tax expense	$	39.9		$	22.5			62.4			(2.5	)		44.0			1.7			105.6
Income tax expense								—			—			(9.7	)		—			(9.7	)
Net income								62.4			(2.5	)		34.3			1.7			95.9
Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest								—			—			0.6			(1.7	)		(1.1	)
Net income available to SiriusPoint							$	62.4		$	(2.5	)	$	34.9		$	—		$	94.8

Attritional losses	$	134.9		$	174.2		$	309.1		$	(1.4	)	$	48.7		$	—		$	356.4
Prior year loss reserve development		(10.3	)		2.3			(8.0	)		—			(30.9	)		—			(38.9	)
Loss and loss adjustment expenses incurred, net	$	124.6		$	176.5		$	301.1		$	(1.4	)	$	17.8		$	—		$	317.5

Underwriting Ratios: ⁽¹⁾
Attritional loss ratio		53.2	%		65.9	%		59.7	%											60.0	%
Prior year loss development ratio	(4.1)%				0.9	%	(1.6)%												(6.5)%
Loss ratio		49.1	%		66.8	%		58.1	%											53.5	%
Acquisition cost ratio		27.5	%		24.7	%		26.1	%											24.4	%
Other underwriting expenses ratio		7.6	%		6.9	%		7.2	%											7.0	%
Combined ratio		84.2	%		98.4	%		91.4	%											84.9	%

(1)	Underwriting ratios are calculated by dividing the related expense by net premiums earned.
(2)	Insurance & Services MGAs recognize fees for service using revenue from contracts with customers accounting standards, whereas insurance companies recognize acquisition expenses using insurance contract accounting standards. While ultimate revenues and expenses recognized will match, there will be recognition timing differences based on the different accounting standards.

SIRIUSPOINT LTD.
NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES AND RECONCILIATIONS & OTHER FINANCIAL MEASURES

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

Core Results

Collectively, the sum of the Company’s two segments, Reinsurance and Insurance & Services, constitute “Core” results. Core underwriting income, Core net services income, Core income and Core combined ratio are non-GAAP financial measures. We believe it is useful to review Core results as it better reflects how management views the business and reflects our decision to exit the runoff business. The sum of Core results and Corporate results are equal to the consolidated results of operations.

Core underwriting income – calculated by subtracting loss and loss adjustment expenses incurred, net, acquisition costs, net, and other underwriting expenses from net premiums earned.

Core net services income – consists of services revenues which include commissions, brokerage and fee income related to consolidated MGAs, and other revenues, as well as services expenses which include direct expenses related to consolidated MGAs and services noncontrolling income which represent minority ownership interests in consolidated MGAs. Net services income is a key indicator of the profitability of the Company’s services provided.

Core income – consists of two components, core underwriting income and core net services income. Core income is a key measure of our segment performance.

Core combined ratio – calculated by dividing the sum of Core loss and loss adjustment expenses incurred, net, acquisition costs, net and other underwriting expenses by Core net premiums earned. Accident year loss ratio and accident year combined ratio are calculated by excluding prior year loss reserve development to present the impact of current accident year net loss and loss adjustment expenses on the Core loss ratio and Core combined ratio, respectively. Attritional loss ratio excludes catastrophe losses from the accident year loss ratio as they are not predictable as to timing and amount. These ratios are useful indicators of our underwriting profitability.

Book Value Per Diluted Common Share Metrics

Book value per diluted common share excluding AOCI and tangible book value per diluted common share, as presented, are non-GAAP financial measures and the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measure is book value per common share. Management believes it is useful to exclude AOCI because it may fluctuate significantly between periods based on movements in interest and currency rates. Tangible book value per diluted common share excludes intangible assets. Management believes that effects of intangible assets are not indicative of underlying underwriting results or trends and make book value comparisons to less acquisitive peer companies less meaningful. Tangible book value per diluted common share is useful because it provides a more accurate measure of the realizable value of shareholder returns, excluding intangible assets.

The following table sets forth the computation of book value per common share, book value per diluted common share and tangible book value per diluted common share as of March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024:

	March 31, 2025		December 31, 2024
	($ in millions, except share and per share amounts)
Common shareholders’ equity attributable to SiriusPoint common shareholders	$	1,825.2	$	1,737.4

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax		26.4		(4.1	)
Common shareholders’ equity attributable to SiriusPoint common shareholders ex. AOCI		1,798.8		1,741.5

Intangible assets		137.9		140.8
Tangible common shareholders’ equity attributable to SiriusPoint common shareholders	$	1,687.3	$	1,596.6

Common shares outstanding		116,020,526		116,429,057
Effect of dilutive stock options, restricted share units and warrants		2,708,756		2,559,359
Book value per diluted common share denominator		118,729,282		118,988,416

Book value per common share	$	15.73	$	14.92
Book value per diluted common share	$	15.37	$	14.60
Book value per diluted common share ex. AOCI	$	15.15	$	14.64
Tangible book value per diluted common share	$	14.21	$	13.42

Other Financial Measures

Annualized Return on Average Common Shareholders’ Equity Attributable to SiriusPoint Common Shareholders

Annualized return on average common shareholders’ equity attributable to SiriusPoint common shareholders is calculated by dividing annualized net income available to SiriusPoint common shareholders for the period by the average common shareholders’ equity determined using the common shareholders’ equity balances at the beginning and end of the period.

Annualized return on average common shareholders’ equity attributable to SiriusPoint common shareholders for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024 was calculated as follows:

		2025			2024
	($ in millions)
Net income available to SiriusPoint common shareholders	$	57.6		$	90.8
Common shareholders’ equity attributable to SiriusPoint common shareholders – beginning of period		1,737.4			2,313.9
Common shareholders’ equity attributable to SiriusPoint common shareholders – end of period		1,825.2			2,402.6
Average common shareholders’ equity attributable to SiriusPoint common shareholders	$	1,781.3		$	2,358.3
Annualized return on average common shareholders’ equity attributable to SiriusPoint common shareholders		12.9	%		15.4	%

The MIL Network –

May 6, 2025

MIL-OSI USA: ICE HSI Gulfport, partners, investigate illegal immigration, cockfighting operations

Source: US Immigration and Customs Enforcement

Gulfport, Miss. – U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, jointly with the U.S. Department of Agriculture and other partners, executed search warrants involving illegal immigration, cockfighting and other criminal activity in Southern Mississippi May 3.

The investigation was led by the ICE Homeland Security Task Force and the Border Enforcement Security Task Force. In addition to possible state and federal charges relating to animal fighting and gambling, other investigative areas included illegal aliens, narcotics and weapons. Partners in the operation include ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations, Harrison County Sheriff’s Office, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, the Drug Enforcement Administration, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and FBI.

ICE Gulfport special agents and deportation officers are in the process of positively identifying all encountered individuals, as well as checking immigration records.

ICE Gulfport will seek state and federal criminal or administrative charges as appropriate. Federal prosecutions will be led by the Southern District of Mississippi United States Attorney’s Office.

“In addition to the acts of animal cruelty perpetrated by the operators and encouraged by the participants, underground gambling operations such as these often have ties to other significant crimes including narcotics violations, money laundering, and acts of violence,” said ICE HSI New Orleans Special Agent in Charge Eric DeLaune. “These crimes degrade the safety of our communities, and we are proud to be the ones stopping these illegal operations.”

“The Office of Inspector General is committed to working with all of our law enforcement and prosecutorial partners in pursuing individuals who choose to participate in animal fighting activities and engage in violations involving animal welfare, while also committing other serious offenses in our communities,” said Special Agent-in-Charge Dax Roberson of the U.S. Department of Agriculture-Office of Inspector General.

“The United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Mississippi is working with our law enforcement partners to ensure that those who violate our nation’s immigration, narcotics, and animal cruelty laws are held accountable,” said Acting Southern District of Mississippi U.S. Attorney Patrick Lemon.

This case is part of Operation Take Back America, a nationwide initiative that marshals the full resources of the Department of Justice to repel the invasion of illegal immigration, achieve the total elimination of cartels and transnational criminal organizations, and protect our communities from the perpetrators of violent crime. Operation Take Back America streamlines efforts and resources from the Department’s Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Forces and Project Safe Neighborhood.

The public is reminded that all defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.

MIL OSI USA News –

May 6, 2025

MIL-OSI Security: Agawam Man Charged with Possession of Child Pornography

Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) State Crime Alerts (b)

BOSTON – An Agawam man was charged with possession of child sexual abuse material (CSAM).

Warren Messeck, 75, was charged by criminal complaint with one count of possession of child pornography. He made an initial appearance before U.S. Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson in Springfield.

In 2021, Messeck was identified as a user of an internet-based peer-to-peer network downloading CSAM. A subsequent search of his residence resulted in the recovery of over 40 electronic devices including a laptop, hard drives and other electronic storage devices. A forensic examination allegedly revealed over 10,000 files depicting CSAM on six of the seized devices.

The charge of possession of child pornography provides for a sentence of at least 10 years and up to 20 years in prison, a minimum of five years and up to life of supervised release and a fine of up to $250,000. Sentences are imposed by a federal district court judge based upon the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and statutes which govern the determination of a sentence in a criminal case.

United States Attorney Leah B. Foley and James Crowley, Acting Special Agent in Charge of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Boston Division made the announcement today. Valuable assistance was provided by the Agawam Police Department. Assistant U.S. Attorney Caroline Merck of the Springfield Branch Office is prosecuting the case.

This case was brought as part of Project Safe Childhood, a nationwide initiative to combat the growing epidemic of child sexual exploitation and abuse, launched in May 2006 by the Department of Justice. Led by the U.S. Attorneys’ Offices and the DOJ’s Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, Project Safe Childhood marshals federal, state, and local resources to locate, apprehend and prosecute individuals who exploit children, as well as identify and rescue victims. For more information about Project Safe Childhood, please visit https://www.justice.gov/psc.

The details contained in the charging documents are allegations. The defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.

MIL Security OSI –

May 6, 2025

MIL-OSI: Diamondback Energy, Inc. Announces First Quarter 2025 Financial and Operating Results

Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

MIDLAND, Texas, May 05, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Diamondback Energy, Inc. (NASDAQ: FANG) (“Diamondback” or the “Company”) today announced financial and operating results for the first quarter ended March 31, 2025.

FIRST QUARTER 2025 AND RECENT HIGHLIGHTS

Average oil production of 475.9 MBO/d (850.7 MBOE/d)
Net cash provided by operating activities of $2.4 billion; Operating Cash Flow Before Working Capital Changes (as defined and reconciled below) of $2.5 billion
Cash capital expenditures of $942 million
Free Cash Flow (as defined and reconciled below) of $1.5 billion; Adjusted Free Cash Flow (as defined and reconciled below) of $1.6 billion
Declared Q1 2025 base cash dividend of $1.00 per share payable on May 22, 2025; implies a 2.9% annualized yield based on May 2, 2025 closing share price of $136.81
Repurchased 3,656,044 shares of common stock in Q1 2025 for $575 million excluding excise tax (at a weighted average price of $157.15 per share); repurchased 1,965,180 shares of common stock to date in Q2 2025 for $255 million excluding excise tax (at a weighted average price of $129.71 per share)
Total Q1 2025 return of capital of $864 million; represents ~55% of Adjusted Free Cash Flow (as defined and reconciled below) from stock repurchases and the declared Q1 2025 base dividend
As previously announced, closed acquisition of certain subsidiaries of Double Eagle IV Midco, LLC (“Double Eagle”) on April 1st
Closed drop down transaction to Viper Energy, Inc. (“Viper”), a subsidiary of Diamondback, on May 1st

UPDATED 2025 GUIDANCE HIGHLIGHTS

As a result of recent commodity price volatility, Diamondback is reducing activity in order to prioritize free cash flow generation. The Company believes this revised plan enhances capital efficiency and provides flexibility to (i) cut additional capital if prices weaken further or (ii) resume its original 2025 plan if commodity prices strengthen.

Full year oil production of 480 – 495 MBO/d (857 – 900 MBOE/d)
Full year 2025 cash capital expenditures guidance of $3.4 – $3.8 billion
The Company expects to drill 385 – 435 gross (349 – 395 net) wells and complete between 475 – 550 gross (444 – 514 net) wells with an average lateral length of approximately 11,500 feet in 2025
Q2 2025 oil production guidance of 485 – 500 MBO/d (866 – 900 MBOE/d)
Q2 2025 cash capital expenditures guidance of $800 – $900 million
Implies full year 2025 oil production per million dollars of cash capital expenditures (“MBO per $MM of CAPEX”) of 49.4, ~10% better than the Company’s original full year 2025 guidance provided in February 2025

OPERATIONS UPDATE

The tables below provide a summary of operating activity for the first quarter of 2025.

Total Activity (Gross Operated):
	Number of Wells Drilled	Number of Wells Completed
Midland Basin	124	116
Delaware Basin	2	7
Total	126	123

Total Activity (Net Operated):
	Number of Wells Drilled	Number of Wells Completed
Midland Basin	116	112
Delaware Basin	2	7
Total	118	119

During the first quarter of 2025, Diamondback drilled 124 gross wells in the Midland Basin and two gross wells in the Delaware Basin. The Company turned 116 operated wells to production in the Midland Basin and seven gross wells in the Delaware Basin, with an average lateral length of 11,978 feet. Operated completions during the first quarter consisted of 30 Wolfcamp A wells, 28 Lower Spraberry wells, 22 Wolfcamp B wells, 17 Jo Mill wells, eight Middle Spraberry wells, four Dean wells, four Barnett wells, three Third Bone Spring wells, three Wolfcamp D wells, two Second Bone Spring wells and two Upper Spraberry wells.

FINANCIAL UPDATE

Diamondback’s first quarter 2025 net income was $1.4 billion, or $4.83 per diluted share. Adjusted net income (as defined and reconciled below) for the first quarter was $1.3 billion, or $4.54 per diluted share.

First quarter 2025 net cash provided by operating activities was $2.4 billion.

During the first quarter of 2025, Diamondback spent $864 million on operated drilling and completions, $21 million on capital workovers and non-operated drilling and completions and $57 million on infrastructure, environmental and midstream, for total cash capital expenditures of $942 million.

First quarter 2025 Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA (as defined and reconciled below) was $2.9 billion. Adjusted EBITDA net of non-controlling interest (as defined and reconciled below) for the first quarter was $2.8 billion.

Diamondback’s first quarter 2025 Free Cash Flow (as defined and reconciled below) was $1.5 billion. Adjusted Free Cash Flow (as reconciled and defined below) for the first quarter was $1.6 billion.

First quarter 2025 average unhedged realized prices were $70.95 per barrel of oil, $2.11 per Mcf of natural gas and $23.94 per barrel of natural gas liquids (“NGLs”), resulting in a total equivalent unhedged realized price of $47.77 per BOE.

Diamondback’s cash operating costs for the first quarter of 2025 were $10.48 per BOE, including lease operating expenses (“LOE”) of $5.33 per BOE, cash general and administrative (“G&A”) expenses of $0.72 per BOE, production and ad valorem taxes of $2.98 per BOE and gathering, processing and transportation expenses of $1.45 per BOE.

As of March 31, 2025, Diamondback had $1.3 billion in standalone cash and no borrowings outstanding under its revolving credit facility, with approximately $2.5 billion available for future borrowings under the facility and approximately $3.8 billion of total liquidity. As of March 31, 2025, the Company had consolidated total debt of $14.1 billion and consolidated net debt (as defined and reconciled below) of $12.3 billion, up from consolidated total debt of $13.2 billion and consolidated net debt of $13.0 billion as of December 31, 2024.

DIVIDEND DECLARATIONS

Diamondback announced today that the Company’s Board of Directors declared a base cash dividend of $1.00 per common share for the first quarter of 2025 payable on May 22, 2025 to stockholders of record at the close of business on May 15, 2025.

Future base and variable dividends remain subject to review and approval at the discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors.

COMMON STOCK REPURCHASE PROGRAM

During the first quarter of 2025, Diamondback repurchased ~3.7 million shares of common stock at an average share price of $157.15 for a total cost of approximately $575 million, excluding excise tax. To date, Diamondback has repurchased ~30.2 million shares of common stock at an average share price of $137.55 for a total cost of approximately $4.2 billion and has approximately $1.8 billion remaining on its current share buyback authorization. Subject to factors discussed below, Diamondback intends to continue to purchase common stock under the common stock repurchase program opportunistically with cash on hand, free cash flow from operations and proceeds from potential liquidity events such as the sale of assets. This repurchase program has no time limit and may be suspended from time to time, modified, extended or discontinued by the Board at any time. Purchases under the repurchase program may be made from time to time in privately negotiated transactions, or in open market transactions in compliance with Rule 10b-18 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and will be subject to market conditions, applicable regulatory and legal requirements and other factors. Any common stock purchased as part of this program will be retired.

FULL YEAR 2025 GUIDANCE

Below is Diamondback’s updated guidance for the full year 2025, which includes second quarter production, cash tax and capital guidance. Given recent weakness in commodity prices, the Company is reducing its activity levels and lowering its capital budget to prioritize free cash generation. Diamondback will continue to closely monitor the macro environment and has flexibility to (i) cut additional capital if prices weaken further or (ii) resume its original 2025 plan if commodity prices strengthen.

	2025 Guidance	2025 Guidance
	Diamondback Energy, Inc.	Viper Energy, Inc.

2025 Net production – MBOE/d	857 – 900 (from 883 – 909)	74.5 – 79.0
2025 Oil production – MBO/d	480 – 495 (from 485 – 498)	41.0 – 43.5
Q2 2025 Oil production – MBO/d (total – MBOE/d)	485 – 500 (866 – 900)	40.0 – 43.0 (72.5 – 78.0)

Unit costs ($/BOE)
Lease operating expenses, including workovers	$5.65 – $6.05 (from $5.90 – $6.30)
G&A
Cash G&A	$0.60 – $0.75	$0.80 – $1.00
Non-cash equity-based compensation	$0.25 – $0.35	$0.10 – $0.20
DD&A	$14.00 – $15.00	$15.50 – $16.50
Interest expense (net of interest income)	$0.40 – $0.65 (from $0.25 – $0.50)	$2.00 – $2.50
Gathering, processing and transportation	$1.40 – $1.60 (from $1.20 – $1.40)

Production and ad valorem taxes (% of revenue)	~7%	~7%
Corporate tax rate (% of pre-tax income)	23%
Cash tax rate (% of pre-tax income)	19% – 22% (from 17% – 20%)	21% – 23%
Q2 2025 Cash taxes ($ – million)⁽¹⁾	$340 – $400	$10 – $15

Capital Budget ($ – million)
Operated drilling and completion	$2,780 – $3,090 (from $3,130 – $3,440)
Capital workovers, non-operated properties and science	$280 – $320
Infrastructure, environmental and midstream⁽²⁾	$340 – $390 (from $390 – $440)
2025 Total capital expenditures	$3,400 – $3,800 (from $3,800 – $4,200)
Q2 2025 Capital expenditures	$800 – $900

Gross horizontal wells drilled (net)	385 – 435 (349 – 395) (from 446 – 471 (406 – 428))
Gross horizontal wells completed (net)	475 – 550 (444 – 514) (from 557 – 592 (526 – 560))
Average lateral length (Ft.)	~11,500′
FY 2025 Midland Basin well costs per lateral foot	$550 – $590 (from $555 – $605)
FY 2025 Delaware Basin well costs per lateral foot	$860 – $910
Midland Basin completed net lateral feet (%)	~95%
Delaware Basin completed net lateral feet (%)	~5%

^⁽¹⁾	Includes approximately $170 million of cash taxes related to the Viper dropdown transaction.
^⁽²⁾	Includes approximately $60 million in estimated midstream capital expenditures for the full year 2025.

CONFERENCE CALL

Diamondback will host a conference call and webcast for investors and analysts to discuss its results for the first quarter of 2025 on Tuesday, May 6, 2025 at 8:00 a.m. CT. Access to the webcast, and replay which will be available following the call, may be found here. The live webcast of the earnings conference call will also be available via Diamondback’s website at www.diamondbackenergy.com under the “Investor Relations” section of the site.

About Diamondback Energy, Inc.

Diamondback is an independent oil and natural gas company headquartered in Midland, Texas focused on the acquisition, development, exploration and exploitation of unconventional, onshore oil and natural gas reserves primarily in the Permian Basin in West Texas. For more information, please visit www.diamondbackenergy.com.

Forward-Looking Statements

This news release contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act, which involve risks, uncertainties, and assumptions. All statements, other than statements of historical fact, including statements regarding Diamondback’s: future performance; business strategy; future operations (including drilling plans and capital plans); estimates and projections of revenues, losses, costs, expenses, returns, cash flow, and financial position; reserve estimates and its ability to replace or increase reserves; anticipated benefits or other effects of strategic transactions (including the recently completed Endeavor merger, the recently completed Double Eagle acquisition and other acquisitions or divestitures); and plans and objectives of management (including plans for future cash flow from operations and for executing environmental strategies) are forward-looking statements. When used in this news release, the words “aim,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “continue,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “forecast,” “future,” “guidance,” “intend,” “may,” “model,” “outlook,” “plan,” “positioned,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “seek,” “should,” “target,” “will,” “would,” and similar expressions (including the negative of such terms) as they relate to Diamondback are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain such identifying words. Although Diamondback believes that the expectations and assumptions reflected in its forward-looking statements are reasonable as and when made, they involve risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict and, in many cases, beyond Diamondback’s control. Accordingly, forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and Diamondback’s actual outcomes could differ materially from what Diamondback has expressed in its forward-looking statements.

Factors that could cause the outcomes to differ materially include (but are not limited to) the following: changes in supply and demand levels for oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids, and the resulting impact on the price for those commodities; the impact of public health crises, including epidemic or pandemic diseases and any related company or government policies or actions; changes in U.S. energy, environmental, monetary and trade policies, including with respect to tariffs or other trade barriers, and any resulting trade tensions; actions taken by the members of OPEC and Russia affecting the production and pricing of oil, as well as other domestic and global political, economic, or diplomatic developments, including any impact of the ongoing war in Ukraine and the Israel-Hamas war on the global energy markets and geopolitical stability; instability in the financial markets; inflationary pressures; higher interest rates and their impact on the cost of capital; regional supply and demand factors, including delays, curtailment delays or interruptions of production, or governmental orders, rules or regulations that impose production limits; federal and state legislative and regulatory initiatives relating to hydraulic fracturing, including the effect of existing and future laws and governmental regulations; physical and transition risks relating to climate change; those risks described in Item 1A of Diamondback’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on February 26, 2025, and those risks disclosed in its subsequent filings on Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K, which can be obtained free of charge on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov and Diamondback’s website at www.diamondbackenergy.com/investors.

In light of these factors, the events anticipated by Diamondback’s forward-looking statements may not occur at the time anticipated or at all. Moreover, Diamondback operates in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment and new risks emerge from time to time. Diamondback cannot predict all risks, nor can it assess the impact of all factors on its business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated by any forward-looking statements it may make. Accordingly, you should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this letter or, if earlier, as of the date they were made. Diamondback does not intend to, and disclaims any obligation to, update or revise any forward-looking statements unless required by applicable law.


Diamondback Energy, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(unaudited, in millions, except share amounts)

	March 31,			December 31,
	2025			2024
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents ($560 million and $27 million related to Viper)	$	1,816		$	161
Restricted cash		225			3
Accounts receivable:
Joint interest and other, net		257			198
Oil and natural gas sales, net ($146 million and $149 million related to Viper)		1,334			1,387
Inventories		117			116
Derivative instruments		267			168
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		67			77
Total current assets		4,083			2,110
Property and equipment:
Oil and natural gas properties, full cost method of accounting ($22,019 million and $22,666 million excluded from amortization at March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively) ($6,097 million and $5,713 million related to Viper and $2,279 million and $2,180 million excluded from amortization related to Viper)		83,727			82,240
Other property, equipment and land		1,452			1,440
Accumulated depletion, depreciation, amortization and impairment ($1,148 million and $1,081 million related to Viper)		(20,283	)		(19,208	)
Property and equipment, net		64,896			64,472
Funds held in escrow		208			1
Equity method investments		383			375
Derivative instruments		61			2
Deferred income taxes, net ($249 million and $185 million related to Viper)		235			173
Other assets		200			159
Total assets	$	70,066		$	67,292
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable – trade	$	124		$	253
Accrued capital expenditures		754			690
Current maturities of debt		914			900
Other accrued liabilities		761			1,020
Revenues and royalties payable		1,575			1,491
Derivative instruments		75			43
Income taxes payable		550			414
Total current liabilities		4,753			4,811
Long-term debt ($822 million and $1,083 million related to Viper)		12,996			12,075
Derivative instruments		93			106
Asset retirement obligations		586			573
Deferred income taxes		9,887			9,826
Other long-term liabilities		8			39
Total liabilities		28,323			27,430
Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 800,000,000 shares authorized; 287,287,926 and 290,984,373 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively		3			3
Additional paid-in capital		33,125			33,501
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)		5,352			4,238
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		(7	)		(6	)
Total Diamondback Energy, Inc. stockholders’ equity		38,473			37,736
Non-controlling interest		3,270			2,126
Total equity		41,743			39,862
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	70,066		$	67,292


Diamondback Energy, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(unaudited, $ in millions except per share data, shares in thousands)

	Three Months Ended March 31,
		2025			2024
Revenues:
Oil, natural gas and natural gas liquid sales	$	3,657		$	2,101
Sales of purchased oil		374			116
Other operating income		17			10
Total revenues		4,048			2,227
Costs and expenses:
Lease operating expenses		408			255
Production and ad valorem taxes		228			119
Gathering, processing and transportation		111			77
Purchased oil expense		382			117
Depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion		1,097			469
General and administrative expenses		73			46
Merger and integration expense		37			12
Other operating expenses		39			14
Total costs and expenses		2,375			1,109
Income (loss) from operations		1,673			1,118
Other income (expense):
Interest expense, net		(40	)		(39	)
Other income (expense), net		27			(3	)
Gain (loss) on derivative instruments, net		226			(48	)
Gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt		—			2
Income (loss) from equity investments, net		8			2
Total other income (expense), net		221			(86	)
Income (loss) before income taxes		1,894			1,032
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes		403			223
Net income (loss)		1,491			809
Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interest		86			41
Net income (loss) attributable to Diamondback Energy, Inc.	$	1,405		$	768

Earnings (loss) per common share:
Basic	$	4.83		$	4.28
Diluted	$	4.83		$	4.28
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
Basic		289,612			178,477
Diluted		289,612			178,477


Diamondback Energy, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(unaudited, in millions)

	Three Months Ended March 31,
		2025			2024
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$	1,491		$	809
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Provision for (benefit from) deferred income taxes		6			52
Depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion		1,097			469
(Gain) loss on extinguishment of debt		—			(2	)
(Gain) loss on derivative instruments, net		(226	)		48
Cash received (paid) on settlement of derivative instruments		85			(4	)
(Income) loss from equity investment, net		(8	)		(2	)
Equity-based compensation expense		18			14
Other		24			16
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(6	)		(95	)
Income tax receivable		3			12
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		6			89
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		(374	)		(110	)
Income taxes payable		135			70
Revenues and royalties payable		84			(35	)
Other		20			3
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		2,355			1,334
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and natural gas properties		(942	)		(609	)
Property acquisitions		(750	)		(153	)
Proceeds from sale of assets		41			12
Other		(2	)		(1	)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		(1,653	)		(751	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from borrowings under credit facilities		2,277			90
Repayments under credit facilities		(2,538	)		(80	)
Proceeds from senior notes		1,200			—
Repayment of senior notes		—			(25	)
Repurchased shares under buyback program		(575	)		(42	)
Proceeds from partial sale of investment in Viper Energy, Inc.		—			451
Net proceeds from Viper’s issuance of common stock		1,232			—
Dividends paid to stockholders		(290	)		(548	)
Dividends/distributions to non-controlling interest		(95	)		(44	)
Other		(36	)		(71	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		1,175			(269	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		1,877			314
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period		164			585
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period	$	2,041		$	899


Diamondback Energy, Inc.
Selected Operating Data
(unaudited)

	Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2025		December 31, 2024		March 31, 2024
Production Data:
Oil (MBbls)		42,835		43,785		24,874
Natural gas (MMcf)		100,578		107,249		50,602
Natural gas liquids (MBbls)		16,961		19,615		8,653
Combined volumes (MBOE)⁽¹⁾		76,559		81,275		41,961

Daily oil volumes (BO/d)		475,944		475,924		273,341
Daily combined volumes (BOE/d)		850,656		883,424		461,110

Average Prices:
Oil ($ per Bbl)	$	70.95	$	69.48	$	75.06
Natural gas ($ per Mcf)	$	2.11	$	0.48	$	0.99
Natural gas liquids ($ per Bbl)	$	23.94	$	19.27	$	21.26
Combined ($ per BOE)	$	47.77	$	42.71	$	50.07

Oil, hedged ($ per Bbl)⁽²⁾	$	70.06	$	68.72	$	74.13
Natural gas, hedged ($ per Mcf)⁽²⁾	$	3.34	$	0.82	$	1.36
Natural gas liquids, hedged ($ per Bbl)⁽²⁾	$	23.94	$	19.27	$	21.26
Average price, hedged ($ per BOE)⁽²⁾	$	48.89	$	42.76	$	49.97

Average Costs per BOE:
Lease operating expenses	$	5.33	$	5.67	$	6.08
Production and ad valorem taxes		2.98		2.77		2.84
Gathering, processing and transportation expense		1.45		1.17		1.84
General and administrative – cash component		0.72		0.69		0.76
Total operating expense – cash	$	10.48	$	10.30	$	11.52

General and administrative – non-cash component	$	0.24	$	0.20	$	0.34
Depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion	$	14.33	$	14.22	$	11.18
Interest expense, net	$	0.52	$	0.42	$	0.93

(1)	Bbl equivalents are calculated using a conversion rate of six Mcf per one Bbl.
(2)	Hedged prices reflect the effect of our commodity derivative transactions on our average sales prices and include gains and losses on cash settlements for matured commodity derivatives, which we do not designate for hedge accounting. Hedged prices exclude gains or losses resulting from the early settlement of commodity derivative contracts.

NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

ADJUSTED EBITDA

Adjusted EBITDA is a supplemental non-GAAP financial measure that is used by management and external users of our financial statements, such as industry analysts, investors, lenders and rating agencies. The Company defines Adjusted EBITDA as net income (loss) attributable to Diamondback Energy, Inc., plus net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interest (“net income (loss)”) before non-cash (gain) loss on derivative instruments, net, interest expense, net, depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion, depreciation and interest expense related to equity method investments, (gain) loss on extinguishment of debt, if any, non-cash equity-based compensation expense, capitalized equity-based compensation expense, merger and integration expenses, other non-cash transactions and provision for (benefit from) income taxes, if any. Adjusted EBITDA is not a measure of net income as determined by United States generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). Management believes Adjusted EBITDA is useful because the measure allows it to more effectively evaluate the Company’s operating performance and compare the results of its operations from period to period without regard to its financing methods or capital structure. The Company adds the items listed above to net income (loss) to determine Adjusted EBITDA because these amounts can vary substantially from company to company within its industry depending upon accounting methods and book values of assets, capital structures and the method by which the assets were acquired. Further, the Company excludes the effects of significant transactions that may affect earnings but are unpredictable in nature, timing and amount, although they may recur in different reporting periods. Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered as an alternative to, or more meaningful than, net income as determined in accordance with GAAP or as an indicator of the Company’s operating performance or liquidity. Certain items excluded from Adjusted EBITDA are significant components in understanding and assessing a company’s financial performance, such as a company’s cost of capital and tax structure, as well as the historic costs of depreciable assets. The Company’s computation of Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies or to such measure in our credit facility or any of our other contracts.

The following tables present a reconciliation of the GAAP financial measure of net income (loss) attributable to Diamondback Energy, Inc. to the non-GAAP financial measure of Adjusted EBITDA:

Diamondback Energy, Inc.
Reconciliation of Net Income (Loss) to Adjusted EBITDA
(unaudited, in millions)

	Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2025			December 31, 2024			March 31, 2024
Net income (loss) attributable to Diamondback Energy, Inc.	$	1,405		$	1,074		$	768
Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interest		86			216			41
Net income (loss)		1,491			1,290			809
Non-cash (gain) loss on derivative instruments, net		(141	)		(51	)		44
Interest expense, net		40			34			39
Depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion		1,097			1,156			469
Depreciation and interest expense related to equity method investments		21			30			23
(Gain) loss on extinguishment of debt		—			—			(2	)
Non-cash equity-based compensation expense		23			24			21
Capitalized equity-based compensation expense		(5	)		(8	)		(7	)
Merger and integration expenses		37			30			12
Other non-cash transactions		(19	)		2			2
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes		403			115			223
Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA		2,947			2,622			1,633
Less: Adjustment for non-controlling interest		146			118			86
Adjusted EBITDA attributable to Diamondback Energy, Inc.	$	2,801		$	2,504		$	1,547

ADJUSTED NET INCOME

Adjusted net income is a non-GAAP financial measure equal to net income (loss) attributable to Diamondback Energy, Inc. plus net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interest (“net income (loss)”) adjusted for non-cash (gain) loss on derivative instruments, net, (gain) loss on extinguishment of debt, if any, merger and integration expense, other non-cash transactions and related income tax adjustments, if any. The Company’s computation of adjusted net income may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies or to such measure in our credit facility or any of our other contracts. Management believes adjusted net income helps investors in the oil and natural gas industry to measure and compare the Company’s performance to other oil and natural gas companies by excluding from the calculation items that can vary significantly from company to company depending upon accounting methods, the book value of assets and other non-operational factors. Further, in order to allow investors to compare the Company’s performance across periods, the Company excludes the effects of significant transactions that may affect earnings but are unpredictable in nature, timing and amount, although they may recur in different reporting periods.

The following table presents a reconciliation of the GAAP financial measure of net income (loss) attributable to Diamondback Energy, Inc. to the non-GAAP measure of adjusted net income:

Diamondback Energy, Inc.
Adjusted Net Income
(unaudited, $ in millions except per share data, shares in thousands)

	Three Months Ended March 31, 2025
	Amounts			Amounts Per Diluted Share
Net income (loss) attributable to Diamondback Energy, Inc.⁽¹⁾	$	1,405		$	4.83
Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interest		86			0.30
Net income (loss)⁽¹⁾		1,491			5.13
Non-cash (gain) loss on derivative instruments, net		(141	)		(0.49	)
Merger and integration expense		37			0.13
Other non-cash transactions		(19	)		(0.07	)
Adjusted net income excluding above items⁽¹⁾		1,368			4.70
Income tax adjustment for above items		26			0.09
Adjusted net income⁽¹⁾		1,394			4.79
Less: Adjusted net income attributable to non-controlling interest		74			0.25
Adjusted net income attributable to Diamondback Energy, Inc.⁽¹⁾	$	1,320		$	4.54

Weighted average common shares outstanding:
Basic					289,612
Diluted					289,612

(1) The Company’s earnings (loss) per diluted share amount has been computed using the two-class method in accordance with GAAP. The two-class method is an earnings allocation which reflects the respective ownership among holders of common stock and participating securities. Diluted earnings per share using the two-class method is calculated as (i) net income attributable to Diamondback Energy, Inc, (ii) less the reallocation of $6 million in earnings attributable to participating securities, (iii) divided by diluted weighted average common shares outstanding for the respective periods.

OPERATING CASH FLOW BEFORE WORKING CAPITAL CHANGES AND FREE CASH FLOW

Operating cash flow before working capital changes, which is a non-GAAP financial measure, represents net cash provided by operating activities as determined under GAAP without regard to changes in operating assets and liabilities. The Company believes operating cash flow before working capital changes is a useful measure of an oil and natural gas company’s ability to generate cash used to fund exploration, development and acquisition activities and service debt or pay dividends. The Company also uses this measure because changes in operating assets and liabilities relate to the timing of cash receipts and disbursements that the Company may not control and may not relate to the period in which the operating activities occurred. This allows the Company to compare its operating performance with that of other companies without regard to financing methods and capital structure.

Free Cash Flow, which is a non-GAAP financial measure, is cash flow from operating activities before changes in working capital in excess of cash capital expenditures. The Company believes that Free Cash Flow is useful to investors as it provides measures to compare both cash flow from operating activities and additions to oil and natural gas properties across periods on a consistent basis as adjusted for non-recurring tax impacts from divestitures, merger and integration expenses, the early termination of derivative contracts and settlements of treasury locks. These measures should not be considered as an alternative to, or more meaningful than, net cash provided by operating activities as an indicator of operating performance. The Company’s computation of Free Cash Flow may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies. The Company uses Free Cash Flow to reduce debt, as well as return capital to stockholders as determined by the Board of Directors.

The following tables present a reconciliation of the GAAP financial measure of net cash provided by operating activities to the non-GAAP measure of operating cash flow before working capital changes and to the non-GAAP measure of Free Cash Flow:

Diamondback Energy, Inc.
Operating Cash Flow Before Working Capital Changes and Free Cash Flow
(unaudited, in millions)

	Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2025			December 31, 2024
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	2,355		$	2,341
Less: Changes in cash due to changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(6	)		(103	)
Income tax receivable		3			(3	)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		6			(24	)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		(374	)		114
Income taxes payable		135			138
Revenues and royalties payable		84			59
Other		20			(100	)
Total working capital changes		(132	)		81
Operating cash flow before working capital changes		2,487			2,260
Additions to oil and natural gas properties		(942	)		(933	)
Total Cash CAPEX		(942	)		(933	)
Free Cash Flow		1,545			1,327
Merger and integration expenses		37			30
Treasury locks		1			—
Adjusted Free Cash Flow	$	1,583		$	1,357

NET DEBT

The Company defines the non-GAAP measure of net debt as total debt (excluding debt issuance costs, discounts, premiums and unamortized basis adjustments) less cash and cash equivalents. Net debt should not be considered an alternative to, or more meaningful than, total debt, the most directly comparable GAAP measure. Management uses net debt to determine the Company’s outstanding debt obligations that would not be readily satisfied by its cash and cash equivalents on hand. The Company believes this metric is useful to analysts and investors in determining the Company’s leverage position because the Company has the ability to, and may decide to, use a portion of its cash and cash equivalents to reduce debt.

Diamondback Energy, Inc.
Net Debt
(unaudited, in millions)

	March 31, 2025			Net Q1 Principal Borrowings/(Repayments)			December 31, 2024			September 30, 2024			June 30, 2024			March 31, 2024
	(in millions)
Diamondback Energy, Inc.⁽¹⁾	$	13,269		$	1,200		$	12,069		$	12,284		$	11,169		$	5,669
Viper Energy, Inc.⁽¹⁾		830			(261	)		1,091			830			1,007			1,103
Total debt		14,099		$	939			13,160			13,114			12,176			6,772
Cash and cash equivalents		(1,816	)					(161	)		(370	)		(6,908	)		(896	)
Net debt	$	12,283					$	12,999		$	12,744		$	5,268		$	5,876

(1)	Excludes debt issuance costs, discounts, premiums and unamortized basis adjustments.

DERIVATIVES

As of May 2, 2025, the Company had the following outstanding consolidated derivative contracts, including derivative contracts at Viper Energy, Inc. The Company’s derivative contracts are based upon reported settlement prices on commodity exchanges, with crude oil derivative settlements based on New York Mercantile Exchange West Texas Intermediate pricing and Crude Oil Brent pricing and with natural gas derivative settlements based on the New York Mercantile Exchange Henry Hub pricing. When aggregating multiple contracts, the weighted average contract price is disclosed.

	Crude Oil (Bbls/day, $/Bbl)
	Q2 2025		Q3 2025		Q4 2025		Q1 2026
Long Puts – Crude Brent Oil		50,000		36,000		21,000		4,000
Long Put Price ($/Bbl)		$58.30		$56.39		$55.00		$55.00
Deferred Premium ($/Bbl)		$-1.50		$-1.50		$-1.47		$-1.45
Long Puts – WTI (Magellan East Houston)		96,000		102,000		65,000		15,000
Long Put Price ($/Bbl)		$55.10		$54.75		$54.62		$55.00
Deferred Premium ($/Bbl)		$-1.59		$-1.61		$-1.63		$-1.66
Long Puts – WTI (Cushing)		152,000		146,000		86,000		25,000
Long Put Price ($/Bbl)		$55.53		$54.40		$53.98		$55.00
Deferred Premium ($/Bbl)		$-1.59		$-1.55		$-1.55		$-1.32
Basis Swaps – WTI (Midland)		71,000		76,000		76,000		—
Basis Swaps – WTI (Midland)		$1.05		$1.05		$1.05		—
Roll Swaps – WTI		25,000		25,000		25,000		—
Roll Swaps – WTI		$0.93		$0.93		$0.93		—

	Natural Gas (Mmbtu/day, $/Mmbtu)
	Q2 2025		Q3 2025		Q4 2025		FY 2026		FY 2027
Costless Collars – Henry Hub		690,000		690,000		690,000		620,000		40,000
Floor Price ($/Mmbtu)		$2.49		$2.49		$2.49		$2.77		$3.00
Ceiling Price ($/Mmbtu)		$5.28		$5.28		$5.28		$6.33		$6.65
Natural Gas Basis Swaps – Waha Hub		610,000		610,000		610,000		460,000		240,000
Natural Gas Basis Swaps – Waha Hub		$-0.88		$-0.88		$-0.88		$-1.62		$-1.48
Natural Gas Basis Swaps – Houston Ship Channel		13,407		20,000		20,000		40,000		—
Natural Gas Basis Swaps – Houston Ship Channel		$-0.49		$-0.49		$-0.49		$-0.37		—

Investor Contact:
Adam Lawlis
+1 432.221.7467
alawlis@diamondbackenergy.com

The MIL Network –

May 6, 2025

MIL-OSI: Viper Energy, Inc., a Subsidiary of Diamondback Energy, Inc., Reports First Quarter 2025 Financial and Operating Results

Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

MIDLAND, Texas, May 05, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Viper Energy, Inc., (NASDAQ:VNOM) (“Viper” or the “Company”), a subsidiary of Diamondback Energy, Inc. (NASDAQ:FANG) (“Diamondback”), today announced financial and operating results for the first quarter ended March 31, 2025.

FIRST QUARTER HIGHLIGHTS

As previously announced, Q1 2025 average production of 31,311 bo/d (57,378 boe/d)
Q1 2025 consolidated net income (including non-controlling interest) of $153 million; net income attributable to Viper of $75 million, or $0.62 per Class A common share
Q1 2025 cash available for distribution to Viper’s Class A common shares (as defined and reconciled below) of $100 million, or $0.76 per Class A common share
Declared Q1 2025 base cash dividend of $0.30 per Class A common share; implies a 2.9% annualized yield based on the May 2, 2025, Class A common share closing price of $42.08
Declared Q1 2025 variable cash dividend of $0.27 per Class A common share; total base-plus-variable dividend of $0.57 per Class A common share implies a 5.4% annualized yield based on the May 2, 2025, Class A common share closing price of $42.08
Total Q1 2025 return of capital to Class A shareholders of $75 million, or $0.57 per Class A common share, represents 75% of cash available for distribution
442 total gross (8.0 net 100% royalty interest) horizontal wells turned to production on Viper’s acreage during Q1 2025 with an average lateral length of 11,946 feet

RECENT EVENTS AND FORWARD OUTLOOK

As previously announced, on May 1, 2025, closed the Drop Down transaction, whereby Viper Energy Partners LLC (“OpCo”), the Company’s operating subsidiary, acquired all of the equity interests of certain mineral and royalty subsidiaries of Diamondback for consideration of $1.0 billion of cash and 69.6 million limited liability company units of OpCo and an equivalent number of shares of the Company’s Class B common stock (the “Drop Down”)
Following the close of the Drop Down, Viper’s long-term issuer default rating was upgraded to BBB- by Fitch; represents second investment grade rating for Viper
As of May 2, 2025, during the second quarter of 2025, repurchased 239,374 shares of the Company’s Class A common stock for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $9 million, excluding excise tax (average price of $37.85 per Class A common share)
As of May 2, 2025, during the second quarter of 2025, repurchased approximately $36 million in aggregate principal amount of the Company’s 5.375% Senior Notes due 2027 (“2027 Notes”)
Initiating average daily production guidance for Q2 2025 of 40,000 to 43,000 bo/d (72,500 to 78,000 boe/d)
Maintaining average daily production for the balance of 2025, following the closing of the Drop Down, of 47,000 to 49,000 bo/d (85,000 to 88,000 boe/d), resulting in expected full year 2025 average daily production of 41,000 to 43,500 bo/d (74,500 to 79,000 boe/d)

“As previously announced, we are excited the transformative Drop Down transaction between Viper and Diamondback has closed. As a result of the conservative financing of this transaction, as well as Viper’s continued strong financial and operating results, we expect leverage to remain below 1.0x even in a sustained $50 per barrel WTI environment. Given the strength of our balance sheet, we will look to use this period of volatility to our advantage where we can, as highlighted by the opportunistic share repurchases we have been able to make so far this quarter,” stated Kaes Van’t Hof, Chief Executive Officer of Viper.

Mr. Van’t Hof continued, “Despite the potential for sustained weakness in commodity prices and reduced activity levels, we expect Viper’s production to remain durable and are maintaining our previous guidance for oil production for the balance of 2025, although we continue to monitor operator activity levels. The symbiotic relationship between Diamondback and Viper is highlighted during times like these where Diamondback continues to focus its development on wells where Viper owns high royalty interests, and therefore enhances Diamondback’s consolidated capital efficiency. Further, the roughly 45% of Viper’s current production that is operated by third parties is predominately exposed to well-capitalized operators in the best parts of the Permian Basin, led by Exxon operating almost half of our third party production.”

FINANCIAL UPDATE

As previously announced, Viper’s first quarter 2025 average unhedged realized prices were $71.33 per barrel of oil, $2.08 per Mcf of natural gas and $24.52 per barrel of natural gas liquids, resulting in a total equivalent realized price of $47.25/boe.

As previously announced, Viper’s first quarter 2025 average hedged realized prices were $70.26 per barrel of oil, $3.74 per Mcf of natural gas and $24.52 per barrel of natural gas liquids, resulting in a total equivalent realized price of $48.99/boe.

During the first quarter of 2025, the Company recorded total operating income of $245 million and consolidated net income (including non-controlling interest) of $153 million.

As of March 31, 2025, the Company had a cash balance of $560 million and total long-term debt outstanding (excluding debt issuance costs, discounts and premiums) of $830 million, resulting in net debt (as defined and reconciled below) of $270 million. Viper’s outstanding long-term debt as of March 31, 2025 consisted of $430 million in aggregate principal amount of its 2027 Notes, $400 million in aggregate principal amount of its 7.375% Senior Notes due 2031 and no borrowings on its revolving credit facility, leaving $1.3 billion available for future borrowings and $1.9 billion of total liquidity.

As of May 1, 2025, after giving effect to the closing of the Drop Down, Viper had roughly $255 million in borrowings on its revolving credit facility, leaving approximately $995 million available for future borrowings and a similar amount of total liquidity.

As of May 2, 2025, during the second quarter of 2025, Viper had repurchased approximately $36 million in aggregate principal amount of the Company’s 2027 Notes.

FIRST QUARTER 2025 CASH DIVIDEND & CAPITAL RETURN PROGRAM

Viper announced today that the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) declared a base cash dividend of $0.30 per Class A common share for the first quarter of 2025, payable on May 22, 2025 to Class A common shareholders of record at the close of business on May 15, 2025.

The Board also declared a variable cash dividend of $0.27 per Class A common share for the first quarter of 2025, payable on May 22, 2025 to Class A common shareholders of record at the close of business on May 15, 2025.

As of May 2, 2025, during the second quarter of 2025, Viper repurchased 239,374 shares of Class A common stock for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $9 million, excluding excise tax (average price of $37.85 per Class A common share). In total, since the initiation of Viper’s common stock repurchase program on November 9, 2020 through May 2, 2025, the Company has repurchased 13,683,957 shares of Class A common stock for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $325 million, reflecting an average price of $23.74 per Class A common share. Future base and variable cash dividends and stock repurchases are at the discretion of the Board and are subject to a number of factors discussed in Viper’s reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

OPERATIONS UPDATE

During the first quarter of 2025, Viper estimates that 442 gross (8.0 net 100% royalty interest) horizontal wells with an average royalty interest of 1.8% were turned to production on its acreage position with an average lateral length of 11,946 feet. Of these 442 gross wells, Diamondback is the operator of 108 gross wells, with an average royalty interest of 4.0%, and the remaining 334 gross wells, with an average royalty interest of 1.1%, are operated by third parties.

As of March 31, 2025, Viper’s footprint of mineral and royalty interests was 37,573 net royalty acres on a historical basis and 60,725 net royalty acres on a pro forma basis, after giving effect to the Drop Down.

Our gross well information as of May 1, 2025 is as follows, after giving effect to the Drop Down:

	Diamondback Operated	Third-Party Operated	Total
Q1 2025 Horizontal wells turned to production⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾:
Gross wells	108	334	442
Net 100% royalty interest wells	4.3	3.7	8.0
Average percent net royalty interest	4.0%	1.1%	1.8%

Horizontal producing well count:
Gross wells	3,725	11,546	15,271
Net 100% royalty interest wells	235.0	165.0	400.0
Average percent net royalty interest	6.3%	1.4%	2.6%

Horizontal active development well count:
Gross wells	239	682	921
Net 100% royalty interest wells	13.0	10.4	23.4
Average percent net royalty interest	5.4%	1.5%	2.5%

Line of sight wells:
Gross wells	417	677	1,094
Net 100% royalty interest wells	27.1	8.9	36.0
Average percent net royalty interest	6.5%	1.3%	3.3%

(1) Represents wells turned to production on Viper’s standalone acreage position; does not give effect to the Drop Down.
(2) Average lateral length of 11,946 feet.

The 921 gross wells currently in the process of active development are those wells that have been spud and are expected to be turned to production within approximately the next six to eight months. Further in regard to the active development on Viper’s asset base, after giving effect to the Drop Down, there are currently 63 gross rigs operating on Viper’s acreage, 16 of which are operated by Diamondback. The 1,094 line-of-sight wells are those that are not currently in the process of active development, but for which Viper has reason to believe that they will be turned to production within approximately the next 15 to 18 months. The expected timing of these line-of-sight wells is based primarily on permitting by third-party operators or Diamondback’s current expected completion schedule. Existing permits or active development of Viper’s royalty acreage does not ensure that those wells will be turned to production.

GUIDANCE UPDATE

Below is Viper’s guidance for the full year 2025, as well as average production guidance for Q2 2025, which gives effect to the Drop Down. Given recent market volatility, Diamondback and our other operators are closely monitoring the macro environment and may review their operating plans for the remainder of 2025, and thus our production guidance could be subject to change.


	Viper Energy, Inc.

Q2 2025 Net Production – Mbo/d	40.0 – 43.0
Q2 2025 Net Production – Mboe/d	72.5 – 78.0
Full Year 2025 Net Production – Mbo/d	41.0 – 43.5
Full Year 2025 Net Production – Mboe/d	74.5 – 79.0

Unit costs ($/boe)
Depletion	$15.50 – $16.50
Cash G&A	$0.80 – $1.00
Non-Cash Share-Based Compensation	$0.10 – $0.20
Net Interest Expense	$2.00 – $2.50

Production and Ad Valorem Taxes (% of Revenue)	~7%
Cash Tax Rate (% of Pre-Tax Income Attributable to the Company)⁽¹⁾	21% – 23%
Q2 2025 Cash Taxes ($ – million)⁽²⁾	$10 – $15

(1) Pre-tax income attributable to the Company is reconciled below.
(2) Attributable to the Company.

CONFERENCE CALL

Viper will host a conference call and webcast for investors and analysts to discuss its results for the first quarter of 2025 on Tuesday, May 6, 2025 at 10:00 a.m. CT. Access to the live audio-only webcast, and replay which will be available following the call, may be found here. The live webcast of the earnings conference call will also be available via Viper’s website at www.viperenergy.com under the “Investor Relations” section of the site.

About Viper Energy, Inc.

Viper is a corporation formed by Diamondback to own, acquire and exploit oil and natural gas properties in North America, with a focus on owning and acquiring mineral and royalty interests in oil-weighted basins, primarily the Permian Basin in West Texas. For more information, please visit www.viperenergy.com.

About Diamondback Energy, Inc.

Diamondback is an independent oil and natural gas company headquartered in Midland, Texas focused on the acquisition, development, exploration and exploitation of unconventional, onshore oil and natural gas reserves primarily in the Permian Basin in West Texas. For more information, please visit www.diamondbackenergy.com.

Forward-Looking Statements

This news release contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which involve risks, uncertainties, and assumptions. All statements, other than statements of historical fact, including statements regarding Viper’s: future performance; business strategy; future operations; estimates and projections of operating income, losses, costs and expenses, returns, cash flow, and financial position; production levels on properties in which Viper has mineral and royalty interests, developmental activity by other operators; reserve estimates and Viper’s ability to replace or increase reserves; anticipated benefits or other effects of strategic transactions (including the Drop Down and any other acquisitions or divestitures); and plans and objectives (including Diamondback’s plans for developing Viper’s acreage and Viper’s cash dividend policy and common stock repurchase program) are forward-looking statements. When used in this news release, the words “aim,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “continue,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “forecast,” “future,” “guidance,” “intend,” “may,” “model,” “outlook,” “plan,” “positioned,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “seek,” “should,” “target,” “will,” “would,” and similar expressions (including the negative of such terms) as they relate to Viper are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain such identifying words. Although Viper believes that the expectations and assumptions reflected in its forward-looking statements are reasonable as and when made, they involve risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict and, in many cases, beyond its control. Accordingly, forward-looking statements are not guarantees of Viper’s future performance and the actual outcomes could differ materially from what Viper expressed in its forward-looking statements.

Factors that could cause the outcomes to differ materially include (but are not limited to) the following: changes in supply and demand levels for oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids, and the resulting impact on the price for those commodities; the impact of public health crises, including epidemic or pandemic diseases, and any related company or government policies or actions; changes in U.S. energy, environmental, monetary and trade policies, including with respect to tariffs or other trade barriers, and any resulting trade tensions; actions taken by the members of OPEC and Russia affecting the production and pricing of oil, as well as other domestic and global political, economic, or diplomatic developments, including any impact of the ongoing war in Ukraine and the Israel-Hamas war on the global energy markets and geopolitical stability; instability in the financial sector; higher interest rates and their impact on the cost of capital; regional supply and demand factors, including delays, curtailment delays or interruptions of production on Viper’s mineral and royalty acreage, or governmental orders, rules or regulations that impose production limits on such acreage; federal and state legislative and regulatory initiatives relating to hydraulic fracturing, including the effect of existing and future laws and governmental regulations; physical and transition risks relating to climate change and the risks and other factors disclosed in Viper’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including its Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K, which can be obtained free of charge on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s web site at http://www.sec.gov.

In light of these factors, the events anticipated by Viper’s forward-looking statements may not occur at the time anticipated or at all. Moreover, new risks emerge from time to time. Viper cannot predict all risks, nor can it assess the impact of all factors on its business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated by any forward-looking statements it may make. Accordingly, you should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements made in this news release. All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this news release or, if earlier, as of the date they were made. Viper does not intend to, and disclaims any obligation to, update or revise any forward-looking statements unless required by applicable law.

Viper Energy, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(unaudited, in millions, except par values and share data)

	March 31,			December 31,
		2025			2024
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	560		$	27
Royalty income receivable (net of allowance for credit losses)		146			149
Royalty income receivable—related party		41			31
Income tax receivable		2			2
Derivative instruments		31			18
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		12			11
Total current assets		792			238
Property:
Oil and natural gas interests, full cost method of accounting ($2,279 and $2,180 excluded from depletion at March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively)		6,097			5,713
Land		6			6
Accumulated depletion and impairment		(1,148	)		(1,081	)
Property, net		4,955			4,638
Derivative instruments		12			—
Deferred income taxes (net of allowances)		249			185
Funds held in escrow		223			1
Other assets		7			7
Total assets	$	6,238		$	5,069
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable—related party	$	2		$	2
Accrued liabilities		66			43
Derivative instruments		5			2
Income taxes payable		18			2
Total current liabilities		91			49
Long-term debt, net		822			1,083
Derivative instruments		2			—
Other long-term liabilities		—			30
Total liabilities		915			1,162
Stockholders’ equity:
Class A Common Stock, $0.000001 par value: 1,000,000,000 shares authorized; 131,323,078 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2025 and 102,977,142 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2024		—			—
Class B Common Stock, $0.000001 par value: 1,000,000,000 shares authorized; 87,831,750 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2025 and 85,431,453 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2024		—			—
Additional paid-in capital		2,566			1,569
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)		108			118
Total Viper Energy, Inc. stockholders’ equity		2,674			1,687
Non-controlling interest		2,649			2,220
Total equity		5,323			3,907
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	6,238		$	5,069

Viper Energy, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(unaudited, in millions, except per share amounts, shares in thousands)

	Three Months Ended March 31,
		2025			2024
Operating income:
Oil income	$	201		$	177
Natural gas income		15			7
Natural gas liquids income		28			21
Royalty income		244			205
Lease bonus income		1			—
Total operating income		245			205
Costs and expenses:
Production and ad valorem taxes		17			14
Depletion		67			47
General and administrative expenses—related party		4			2
General and administrative expenses		2			3
Total costs and expenses		90			66
Income (loss) from operations		155			139
Other income (expense):
Interest expense, net		(13	)		(20	)
Gain (loss) on derivative instruments, net		32			(7	)
Total other income (expense), net		19			(27	)
Income (loss) before income taxes		174			112
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes		21			13
Net income (loss)		153			99
Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interest		78			56
Net income (loss) attributable to Viper Energy, Inc.	$	75		$	43

Net income (loss) attributable to common shares:
Basic	$	0.62		$	0.49
Diluted	$	0.62		$	0.49
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:
Basic		120,926			87,537
Diluted		121,030			87,629

Viper Energy, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(unaudited, in millions)

	Three Months Ended March 31,
		2025			2024
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$	153		$	99
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Provision for (benefit from) deferred income taxes		(1	)		(1	)
Depletion		67			47
(Gain) loss on derivative instruments, net		(32	)		7
Net cash receipts (payments) on derivatives		9			(3	)
Other		1			2
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Royalty income receivable		3			(23	)
Royalty income receivable—related party		(10	)		(30	)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		(4	)		5
Accounts payable—related party		—			(1	)
Income taxes payable		15			12
Other		—			1
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		201			115
Cash flows from investing activities:
Acquisitions of oil and natural gas interests		(486	)		(21	)
Proceeds from sale of oil and natural gas interests		—			1
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		(486	)		(20	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from borrowings under credit facility		295			90
Repayment on credit facility		(556	)		(80	)
Net proceeds from public offering		1,232			—
Dividends to stockholders		(85	)		(44	)
Dividends to Diamondback		(59	)		(67	)
Dividends to other non-controlling interest		(9	)		—
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		818			(101	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		533			(6	)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period		27			26
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period	$	560		$	20

Viper Energy, Inc.
Selected Operating Data
(unaudited)

	Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2025		December 31, 2024		March 31, 2024
Production Data:
Oil (MBbls)		2,818		2,747		2,312
Natural gas (MMcf)		7,221		7,236		5,589
Natural gas liquids (MBbls)		1,142		1,209		954
Combined volumes (Mboe)⁽¹⁾		5,164		5,162		4,198

Average daily oil volumes (bo/d)		31,311		29,859		25,407
Average daily combined volumes (boe/d)		57,378		56,109		46,132

Average sales prices:
Oil ($/Bbl)	$	71.33	$	69.91	$	76.61
Natural gas ($/Mcf)	$	2.08	$	0.84	$	1.22
Natural gas liquids ($/Bbl)	$	24.52	$	22.15	$	22.17
Combined ($/boe)⁽²⁾	$	47.25	$	43.56	$	48.85

Oil, hedged ($/Bbl)⁽³⁾	$	70.26	$	69.00	$	75.64
Natural gas, hedged ($/Mcf)⁽³⁾	$	3.74	$	1.05	$	1.12
Natural gas liquids ($/Bbl)⁽³⁾	$	24.52	$	22.15	$	22.17
Combined price, hedged ($/boe)⁽³⁾	$	48.99	$	43.38	$	48.19

Average Costs ($/boe):
Production and ad valorem taxes	$	3.29	$	3.13	$	3.43
General and administrative – cash component		0.97		0.72		1.08
Total operating expense – cash	$	4.26	$	3.85	$	4.51

General and administrative – non-cash stock compensation expense	$	0.19	$	0.16	$	0.12
Interest expense, net	$	2.52	$	3.70	$	4.67
Depletion	$	12.97	$	12.51	$	11.18

(1) Bbl equivalents are calculated using a conversion rate of six Mcf per one Bbl.
(2) Realized price net of all deducts for gathering, transportation and processing.
(3) Hedged prices reflect the impact of cash settlements of our matured commodity derivative transactions on our average sales prices.

NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

Adjusted EBITDA is a supplemental non-GAAP (as defined below) financial measure that is used by management and external users of our financial statements, such as industry analysts, investors, lenders and rating agencies. Viper defines Adjusted EBITDA as net income (loss) attributable to the Company, plus net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interest (“net income (loss)”) before interest expense, net, non-cash share-based compensation expense, depletion, non-cash (gain) loss on derivative instruments, (gain) loss on extinguishment of debt, if any, other non-cash operating expenses, if any, other non-recurring expenses, if any, and provision for (benefit from) income taxes. Adjusted EBITDA is not a measure of net income as determined by United States’ generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). Management believes Adjusted EBITDA is useful because it allows them to more effectively evaluate Viper’s operating performance and compare the results of its operations from period to period without regard to its financing methods or capital structure. Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered as an alternative to, or more meaningful than, net income, royalty income, cash flow from operating activities or any other measure of financial performance or liquidity presented as determined in accordance with GAAP. Certain items excluded from Adjusted EBITDA are significant components in understanding and assessing a company’s financial performance, such as a company’s cost of capital and tax structure, as well as the historic costs of depreciable assets, none of which are components of Adjusted EBITDA.

Viper defines cash available for distribution to the Company’s shareholders generally as an amount equal to its Adjusted EBITDA for the applicable quarter less cash needed for income taxes payable for the current period, debt service, contractual obligations, fixed charges and reserves for future operating or capital needs that the Board may deem appropriate, lease bonus income, net of tax, distribution equivalent rights payments, preferred dividends, and an adjustment for changes in ownership interests that occurred subsequent to the quarter, if any. Management believes cash available for distribution is useful because it allows them to more effectively evaluate Viper’s operating performance excluding the impact of non-cash financial items and short-term changes in working capital. Viper’s computations of Adjusted EBITDA and cash available for distribution may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies or to such measure in its credit facility or any of its other contracts. Viper further defines cash available for variable dividends as at least 75 percent of cash available for distribution less base dividends declared and repurchased shares as part of its share buyback program for the applicable quarter.

The following tables present a reconciliation of the GAAP financial measure of net income (loss) to the non-GAAP financial measures of Adjusted EBITDA, cash available for distribution and cash available for variable dividends:

Viper Energy, Inc.
(unaudited, in millions, except per share data)

	Three Months Ended March 31, 2025
Net income (loss) attributable to Viper Energy, Inc.	$	75
Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interest		78
Net income (loss)		153
Interest expense, net		13
Non-cash share-based compensation expense		1
Depletion		67
Non-cash (gain) loss on derivative instruments		(23	)
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes		21
Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA		232
Less: Adjusted EBITDA attributable to non-controlling interest		99
Adjusted EBITDA attributable to Viper Energy, Inc.	$	133

Adjustments to reconcile Adjusted EBITDA to cash available for distribution:
Income taxes payable for the current period	$	(23	)
Debt service, contractual obligations, fixed charges and reserves		(9	)
Lease bonus income, net of tax		(1	)
Cash available for distribution to Viper Energy, Inc. shareholders	$	100

	Three Months Ended March 31, 2025
	Amounts		Amounts Per Common Share
Reconciliation to cash available for variable dividends:
Cash available for distribution to Viper Energy, Inc. shareholders	$	100	$	0.76

Return of Capital	$	75	$	0.57
Less:
Base dividend		39		0.30
Cash available for variable dividends	$	36	$	0.27

Total approved base and variable dividend per share			$	0.57

Class A common stock outstanding				131,323

The following table presents a reconciliation of the GAAP financial measure of income (loss) before income taxes to the non-GAAP financial measure of pre-tax income attributable to the Company. Management believes this measure is useful to investors given it provides the basis for income taxes payable by Viper, which is an adjustment to reconcile Adjusted EBITDA to cash available for distribution to holders of the Company’s Class A common stock.

Viper Energy, Inc.
Pre-tax income attributable to Viper Energy, Inc.
(unaudited, in millions)

	Three Months Ended March 31, 2025
	Three Months Ended March 31, 2025
Income (loss) before income taxes	$	174
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interest		78
Pre-tax income attributable to Viper Energy, Inc.	$	96

Income taxes payable for the current period	$	23
Effective cash tax rate attributable to Viper Energy, Inc.		24.0	%

Adjusted net income (loss) is a non-GAAP financial measure equal to net income (loss) attributable to the Company plus net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interest adjusted for non-cash (gain) loss on derivative instruments, net, (gain) loss on extinguishment of debt, if any, other non-cash operating expenses, if any, other non-recurring expenses, if any, and related income tax adjustments. The Company’s computation of adjusted net income may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies or to such measure in our credit facility or any of our other contracts. Management believes adjusted net income helps investors in the oil and natural gas industry to measure and compare the Company’s performance to other oil and natural gas companies by excluding from the calculation items that can vary significantly from company to company depending upon accounting methods, the book value of assets and other non-operational factors.

The following table presents a reconciliation of the GAAP financial measure of net income (loss) attributable to the Company to the non-GAAP financial measure of adjusted net income (loss):

Viper Energy, Inc.
Adjusted Net Income (Loss)
(unaudited, in millions, except per share data)

	Three Months Ended March 31, 2025
	Amounts			Amounts Per Diluted Share
Net income (loss) attributable to Viper Energy, Inc. ⁽¹⁾	$	75		$	0.62
Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interest		78			0.64
Net income (loss)⁽¹⁾		153			1.26
Non-cash (gain) loss on derivative instruments, net		(23	)		(0.19	)
Adjusted income excluding above items⁽¹⁾		130			1.07
Income tax adjustment for above items		3			0.03
Adjusted net income (loss)⁽¹⁾		133			1.10
Less: Adjusted net income (loss) attributed to non-controlling interests		68			0.56
Adjusted net income (loss) attributable to Viper Energy, Inc. ⁽¹⁾	$	65		$	0.54

Weighted average Class A common shares outstanding:
Basic					120,926
Diluted					121,030

(1) The Company’s earnings (loss) per diluted share amount has been computed using the two-class method in accordance with GAAP. The two-class method is an earnings allocation which reflects the respective ownership among holders of Class A common shares and participating securities. Diluted earnings per share using the two-class method is calculated as (i) net income attributable to the Company, (ii) less any reallocation of earnings attributable to participating securities, and (iii) divided by diluted weighted average Class A common shares outstanding.

RECONCILIATION OF LONG-TERM DEBT TO NET DEBT

The Company defines the non-GAAP measure of net debt as debt (excluding debt issuance costs, discounts and premiums) less cash and cash equivalents. Net debt should not be considered an alternative to, or more meaningful than, total debt, the most directly comparable GAAP measure. Management uses net debt to determine the Company’s outstanding debt obligations that would not be readily satisfied by its cash and cash equivalents on hand. The Company believes this metric is useful to analysts and investors in determining the Company’s leverage position because the Company has the ability to, and may decide to, use a portion of its cash and cash equivalents to reduce debt.

	March 31, 2025			Net Q1 Principal Borrowings/ (Repayments)			December 31, 2024			September 30, 2024			June 30, 2024			March 31, 2024
	(in millions)
Total long-term debt⁽¹⁾	$	830		$	(261	)	$	1,091		$	831		$	1,007		$	1,103
Cash and cash equivalents		(560	)					(27	)		(169	)		(35	)		(20	)
Net debt	$	270					$	1,064		$	662		$	972		$	1,083

(1) Excludes debt issuance costs, discounts & premiums.

Derivatives

As of the filing date, the Company had the following outstanding derivative contracts. The Company’s derivative contracts are based upon reported settlement prices on commodity exchanges, with crude oil derivative settlements based on New York Mercantile Exchange West Texas Intermediate pricing and Crude Oil Brent. When aggregating multiple contracts, the weighted average contract price is disclosed.

	Crude Oil (Bbls/day, $/Bbl)
	Q2 2025			Q3 2025			Q4 2025		FY 2026		FY 2027
Deferred Premium Puts – WTI (Cushing)		20,000			18,000			—		—		—
Strike	$	55.00		$	55.00		$	—	$	—	$	—
Premium	$	(1.61	)	$	(1.60	)	$	—	$	—	$	—

	Natural Gas (Mmbtu/day, $/Mmbtu)
	Q2 2025		Q3 2025		Q4 2025		FY 2026		FY 2027
Costless Collars – Henry Hub		60,000		60,000		60,000		60,000		—
Floor	$	2.50	$	2.50	$	2.50	$	2.75	$	—
Ceiling	$	4.93	$	4.93	$	4.93	$	6.64	$	—

	Natural Gas (Mmbtu/day, $/Mmbtu)
	Q2 2025			Q3 2025			Q4 2025			FY 2026			FY 2027
Natural Gas Basis Swaps – Waha Hub		60,000			60,000			60,000			60,000			40,000
Swap Price	$	(0.80	)	$	(0.80	)	$	(0.80	)	$	(1.50	)	$	(1.40	)

Investor Contact:

Chip Seale
+1 432.247.6218
cseale@viperenergy.com

Source: Viper Energy, Inc.; Diamondback Energy, Inc.

The MIL Network –

May 6, 2025

MIL-OSI: EverQuote Announces First Quarter 2025 Financial Results

Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

First Quarter Revenue Growth of 83% Year-Over-Year to $166.6 million
First Quarter Variable Marketing Dollars Increase of 52% Year-Over-Year to $46.9 million
Delivers First Quarter Net Income of $8.0 million and Record Adjusted EBITDA of $22.5 million

CAMBRIDGE, Mass., May 05, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — EverQuote, Inc. (Nasdaq: EVER), a leading online insurance marketplace, today announced financial results for the first quarter ended March 31, 2025.

“2025 is off to a strong start, building on our momentum from last year, and we once again achieved record financial performance across our key financial metrics of revenue, Variable Marketing Dollars or VMD and Adjusted EBITDA,” said Jayme Mendal, CEO of EverQuote. “Our scale and technology are enabling us to build a competitive moat and leverage a data advantage as we extend AI throughout our traffic and distribution systems. We are delivering strong performance to carriers and agents, and they are rewarding us with increased budgets, which supports continued traffic growth. We remain steadfast in our focus to become the leading growth partner for P&C insurance providers.”

“The first quarter marks our fourth consecutive quarter of record revenue and Adjusted EBITDA performance, and we ended the quarter with a strong cash position and no debt outstanding,” said Joseph Sanborn, CFO of EverQuote. “EverQuote remains resilient to macro conditions and is well positioned for continued success as a broad number of carriers are benefiting from healthy combined ratios and are focusing on driving policy growth. Given this favorable environment, we believe that the long-term thesis of insurance advertising spend shifting to digital channels remains firmly intact.”

First Quarter 2025 Highlights:
(Unless otherwise noted, all comparisons are relative to the first quarter of 2024).

Total revenue grew 83% to $166.6 million.
Automotive insurance vertical revenue of $152.7 million, an increase of 97%.
Home and renters insurance vertical revenue of $13.9 million, an increase of 10%.
VMD grew to $46.9 million, compared to $30.8 million, an increase of 52%.
GAAP net income of $8.0 million, compared to a GAAP net income of $1.9 million. GAAP net income in Q1 2025 included a non-cash charge of $7.9 million related to divesting the remaining P&C direct-to-consumer agency assets to settle an existing legal matter with the former owners of PolicyFuel, which was acquired in 2021.
Adjusted EBITDA of $22.5 million, compared to $7.6 million.
Operating cash flow of $23.3 million, compared to $10.4 million.
Ended the quarter with $125.0 million in cash and cash equivalents, an increase of 22% from $102.1 million at the end of the fourth quarter of 2024.

Second Quarter 2025 Outlook:

Revenue of $155.0 – $160.0 million, representing 34% year-over-year growth at the midpoint.
Variable Marketing Dollars of $45.0 – $47.0 million, representing 26% year-over-year growth at the midpoint.
Adjusted EBITDA of $20.0 – $22.0 million, representing 62% year-over-year growth at the midpoint.

With respect to the Company’s expectations under “Second Quarter 2025 Outlook” above, the Company has not reconciled the non-GAAP measure Adjusted EBITDA to the GAAP measure net income (loss) in this press release because the Company does not provide guidance for stock-based compensation expense, depreciation and amortization expense, legal settlement expense, interest income, and income taxes on a consistent basis as the Company is unable to quantify these amounts without unreasonable efforts, which would be required to include a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to GAAP net income (loss). In addition, the Company believes such a reconciliation would imply a degree of precision that could be confusing or misleading to investors.

Conference Call and Webcast Information

EverQuote will host a conference call and live webcast to discuss its first quarter 2025 financial results at 4:30 p.m. Eastern Time today, May 5, 2025. To access the conference call, dial Toll Free: +1 (800) 715-9871 for the US, or +1 (646) 307-1963 for international callers, and provide conference ID 4210704. The live webcast and replay will be available on the Investors section of the Company’s website at https://investors.everquote.com.

Safe Harbor Statement

This press release contains forward-looking statements, within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All statements other than statements of historical fact contained in this press release, including statements regarding our future results of operations and financial position, business strategy and plans, and objectives of management for future operations, are forward-looking statements. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other important factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance, or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms such as “may,” “should,” “expects,” “might,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “could,” “intends,” “target,” “projects,” “contemplates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential,” “seek,” “would” or “continue,” or the negative of these terms or other similar expressions. The forward-looking statements in this press release are only predictions. We have based these forward-looking statements largely on our current expectations and projections about future events and financial trends that we believe may affect our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee that the future results, levels of activity, performance or events and circumstances reflected in the forward-looking statements will be achieved or occur. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this press release and are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties and assumptions described in our annual report on Form 10-K, our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and our current reports on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) from time to time. Additional information will also be set forth in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2025, which will be filed with the SEC. Because forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, some of which cannot be predicted or quantified, you should not rely on these forward-looking statements as predictions of future events. The events and circumstances reflected in our forward-looking statements may not be achieved or occur and actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. While we may elect to update these forward-looking statements at some point in the future, whether as a result of any new information, future events, or otherwise, we have no current intention of doing so except to the extent required by applicable law. Some of the key factors that could cause actual results to differ include: (1) our dependence on revenue from the property and casualty insurance industries, and specifically automotive insurance, and exposure to risks related to those industries; (2) our dependence on our relationships with insurance providers with no long-term minimum financial commitments; (3) our reliance on a small number of insurance providers for a significant portion of our revenue; (4) our dependence on third-party media sources for a significant portion of visitors to our websites and marketplace; (5) our ability to attract consumers searching for insurance to our websites and marketplace through Internet search engines, display advertising, social media, content-based online advertising and other online sources; (6) any limitations restricting our ability to market to users or collect and use data derived from user activities; (7) risks related to cybersecurity incidents or other network disruptions; (8) risks related to the use of artificial intelligence; (9) our ability to develop new and enhanced products and services to attract and retain consumers and insurance providers, and to successfully monetize them; (10) the impact of competition in our industry and innovation by our competitors; (11) our ability to hire and retain necessary qualified employees to expand our operations; (12) our ability to stay abreast of and comply with new or modified laws and regulations that currently apply or become applicable to our business, including with respect to the insurance industry, telemarketing restrictions and data privacy requirements; (13) our ability to protect our intellectual property rights and maintain and build our brand; (14) our future financial performance, including our expectations regarding our revenue, cost of revenue, variable marketing dollars, operating expenses, cash flows and ability to achieve, and maintain, future profitability; (15) our ability to properly collect, process, store, share, disclose and use consumer information and other data; (16) any impacts of economic developments, including inflation and potential tariffs; and (17) the future trading prices of our Class A common stock.

About EverQuote

EverQuote operates a leading online marketplace for insurance shopping, connecting consumers with insurance provider customers, which includes both carriers and agents. Our vision is to be the leading growth partner for property and casualty, or P&C, insurance providers. Our results-driven marketplace, powered by our proprietary data and technology platform, is improving the way insurance providers attract and connect with consumers shopping for insurance.

For more information, visit https://investors.everquote.com and follow on LinkedIn.

Investor Relations Contact

Brinlea Johnson
The Blueshirt Group
(415) 269-2645


EVERQUOTE, INC.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2025			2024
	(in thousands except per share)
Revenue	$	166,632		$	91,065
Cost and operating expenses(1):
Cost of revenue		5,380			5,041
Sales and marketing		129,430			70,784
Research and development		7,485			6,844
General and administrative		8,440			6,630
Legal settlement		7,900			—
Total cost and operating expenses		158,635			89,299
Income from operations		7,997			1,766
Other income (expense):
Interest income		708			386
Other income (expense), net		(31	)		41
Total other income, net		677			427
Income before income taxes		8,674			2,193
Income tax expense		(684	)		(286	)
Net income	$	7,990		$	1,907
Net income per share:
Basic	$	0.22		$	0.06
Diluted	$	0.21		$	0.05
Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic and diluted:
Basic		35,879			34,387
Diluted		37,667			35,608

^{(1) Amounts include stock-based compensation expense, as follows:}
	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2025			2024
	(in thousands)
Cost of revenue	$	9		$	36
Sales and marketing		1,565			1,594
Research and development		1,370			1,312
General and administrative		2,476			1,576
	$	5,420		$	4,518

EVERQUOTE, INC.
BALANCE SHEET DATA

	March 31,		December 31,
	2025		2024
	(in thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents	$	124,968	$	102,116
Working capital		113,927		99,131
Total assets		232,145		210,530
Total liabilities		82,645		75,162
Total stockholders’ equity		149,500		135,368

EVERQUOTE, INC.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2025			2024
	(in thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	7,990		$	1,907
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization expense		1,221			1,263
Stock-based compensation expense		5,420			4,518
Provision for bad debt		—			18
Unrealized foreign currency transaction (gains) losses		35			(4	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(457	)		(17,123	)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		496			972
Commissions receivable, current and non-current		1,014			1,323
Operating lease right-of-use assets		267			497
Accounts payable		(2,765	)		15,868
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		10,018			1,870
Deferred revenue		335			(2	)
Operating lease liabilities		(268	)		(667	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		23,306			10,440
Cash flows from investing activities:
Acquisition of property and equipment, including costs capitalized for development of internal-use software		(1,133	)		(770	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(1,133	)		(770	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		1,962			1,428
Tax withholding payments related to net share settlement		(1,293	)		(429	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		669			999
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash		10			(5	)
Net increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash		22,852			10,664
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period		102,116			37,956
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period	$	124,968		$	48,620

EVERQUOTE, INC.
FINANCIAL AND OPERATING METRICS

Revenue by vertical:

	Three Months Ended March 31,				Change
	2025		2024		%
	(in thousands)
Automotive	$	152,715	$	77,538		97.0	%
Home and renters		13,904		12,689		9.6	%
Other		13		838		-98.4	%
Total revenue	$	166,632	$	91,065		83.0	%

Other financial and non-financial metrics:

	Three Months Ended March31,				Change
	2025		2024		%
	(in thousands)
Income from operations	$	7,997	$	1,766		352.8	%
Net income	$	7,990	$	1,907		319.0	%
Variable marketing dollars	$	46,860	$	30,818		52.1	%
Adjusted EBITDA(1)	$	22,507	$	7,588		196.6	%

^{(1) Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP measure. Please see “EverQuote, Inc. Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures to GAAP” below for more information.}

To supplement the Company’s financial statements presented in accordance with GAAP and to provide investors with additional information regarding EverQuote’s financial results, the Company has presented Adjusted EBITDA as a non-GAAP financial measure. This non-GAAP financial measure is not based on any standardized methodology prescribed by GAAP and is not necessarily comparable to similarly titled measures presented by other companies.

The Company defines Adjusted EBITDA as net income (loss), excluding the impact of stock-based compensation expense; depreciation and amortization expense; legal settlement expense; interest income; and income taxes. The most directly comparable GAAP measure is net income (loss). The Company monitors and presents Adjusted EBITDA because it is a key measure used by management and the board of directors to understand and evaluate operating performance, to establish budgets and to develop operational goals for managing EverQuote’s business. In particular, the Company believes that excluding the impact of these items in calculating Adjusted EBITDA can provide a useful measure for period-to-period comparisons of EverQuote’s core operating performance.

The Company uses Adjusted EBITDA to evaluate EverQuote’s operating performance and trends and make planning decisions. The Company believes that this non-GAAP financial measure helps identify underlying trends in EverQuote’s business that could otherwise be masked by the effect of the items that the Company excludes in the calculations of Adjusted EBITDA. Accordingly, the Company believes that this financial measure provides useful information to investors and others in understanding and evaluating EverQuote’s operating results, enhancing the overall understanding of the Company’s past performance and future prospects.

The Company’s non-GAAP financial measures are not prepared in accordance with GAAP and should not be considered in isolation of, or as an alternative to, measures prepared in accordance with GAAP. There are a number of limitations related to the use of Adjusted EBITDA rather than net income (loss), which is the most directly comparable financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP. In addition, other companies may use other measures to evaluate their performance, which could reduce the usefulness of the Company’s non-GAAP financial measures as tools for comparison.

The following table reconciles Adjusted EBITDA to net income (loss), the most directly comparable financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP.


EVERQUOTE, INC.
RECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP MEASURES TO GAAP

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2025			2024
	(in thousands)
Net income	$	7,990		$	1,907
Stock-based compensation		5,420			4,518
Depreciation and amortization		1,221			1,263
Legal settlement		7,900			—
Interest income		(708	)		(386	)
Income tax expense		684			286
Adjusted EBITDA	$	22,507		$	7,588

The MIL Network –

May 6, 2025

MIL-OSI: James River Announces First Quarter 2025 Results

Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

PEMBROKE, Bermuda, May 05, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — James River Group Holdings, Ltd. (“James River” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: JRVR) reported net income from continuing operations available to common shareholders of $9.0 million ($0.18 per diluted share) and adjusted net operating income¹ of $9.1 million ($0.19 per diluted share) for the first quarter of 2025.

	Three Months Ended March 31,						Three Months Ended March 31,
*($ in thousands, except for share data)*		2025		per diluted share				2024		per diluted share
Net income from continuing operations available to common shareholders	$	9,019		$	0.18		$	20,883		$	0.53
Net loss from discontinued operations²		(1,414	)	$	(0.02	)		(8,105	)	$	(0.18	)
Net income available to common shareholders		7,605		$	0.16			12,778		$	0.35
Adjusted net operating income¹		9,102		$	0.19			14,832		$	0.39

Unless specified otherwise, all underwriting performance ratios presented herein are for our continuing operations and business not subject to retroactive reinsurance accounting.

First Quarter 2025 Highlights:

Annualized adjusted net operating return on tangible common equity¹ of 11.5% and year to date growth in tangible common equity¹ of 7.1%.
E&S segment combined ratio of 91.5% and renewal rate change of 7.8%, with the majority of underwriting divisions reporting pricing increases.
Specialty Admitted Insurance segment combined ratio of 102.1%, with fronting and program gross written premium declining 21.3%.
De minimis overall prior year reserve activity. Group combined ratio of 99.5%.
Final independent accounting firm determination in the purchase price adjustment dispute related to the sale of JRG Reinsurance Company Ltd. (“JRG Re”), finding in favor of the Company on $53.6 million of the aggregate $54.1 million of items in dispute, resulting in a small downward adjustment to the purchase price of ($0.5) million. This is reflected in the first quarter results.

Frank D’Orazio, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, commented on the first quarter, “Coming out of 2024, our first quarter results show progress in strengthening our underwriting performance and positioning the franchise for long-term, sustainable profitability. Our disciplined approach to risk selection, combined with the actions taken over the past year to strengthen our reserve position, are showing tangible results. As we move forward, we remain focused on delivering value to shareholders as we take advantage of the attractive E&S underwriting environment while closely managing our expenses.”

E&S Segment Highlights:
- For the first quarter of 2025, the segment’s gross written premium was largely flat to the comparable quarter last year.
- Renewal rate increases across the segment were 7.8% during the quarter.
- The segment continued to experience strong submission growth, with the 6% growth in renewal submissions exceeding 2024 levels.
- There was de minimis favorable reserve development during the quarter.
Specialty Admitted Insurance Segment Highlights:
- Gross written premium for the fronting and program business declined 21.3% compared to the prior year quarter, as the Company manages this segment to retain minimal risk. This excludes the impact of our large workers’ compensation program and Individual Risk Workers’ Compensation book, which were non-renewed in the second quarter of 2023 and sold via a renewal rights transaction in the third quarter of 2023, respectively. Overall, premium declined 30.7%
- While the fronting business of the segment is transactional in nature, the Company remains focused on managing its expenses in this segment over the course of the calendar year.
- There was de minimis prior year reserve movement during the quarter.

First Quarter 2025 Operating Results

Gross written premium of $294.4 million, consisting of the following:

	Three Months Ended March 31,
*($ in thousands)*	2025		2024		*% Change*
Excess and Surplus Lines	$	213,243	$	213,691	0	%
Specialty Admitted Insurance		81,118		117,119	(31	)%
	$	294,361	$	330,810	(11	)%

Net written premium of $128.0 million, consisting of the following:

	Three Months Ended March 31,
*($ in thousands)*	2025		2024		*% Change*
Excess and Surplus Lines	$	115,079	$	117,425	(2	)%
Specialty Admitted Insurance		12,877		20,747	(38	)%
	$	127,956	$	138,172	(7	)%

Net earned premium of $151.9 million, consisting of the following:

	Three Months Ended March 31,
*($ in thousands)*	2025		2024		*% Change*
Excess and Surplus Lines	$	137,028	$	145,623	(6	)%
Specialty Admitted Insurance		14,874		26,068	(43	)%
	$	151,902	$	171,691	(12	)%

As cited above, the first quarter of 2025 included de minimis favorable reserve development in each of the two insurance segments. There remains $116.2 million of aggregate limit on the two E&S segment retroactive reinsurance structures which cover the majority of James River’s E&S segment net reserves for James River’s E&S segment for accident years 2010 -2023.
Pre-tax favorable (unfavorable) reserve development by segment on business not subject to retroactive reinsurance accounting for loss portfolio transfers was as follows:

	Three Months Ended March 31,
*($ in thousands)*	2025		2024
Excess and Surplus Lines	$	10	$	(40	)
Specialty Admitted Insurance		121		438
	$	131	$	398

Retroactive benefits of $1.9 million were recorded in loss and loss adjustment expenses during the first quarter and the total deferred retroactive reinsurance gain on the Balance Sheet is $56.0 million as of March 31, 2025.
The consolidated expense ratio was 32.7% for the first quarter of 2025, which was an increase from 28.9% in the prior year quarter. The expense ratio increase was primarily driven by higher compensation expenses on lower net earned premium.

Investment Results
Net investment income for the first quarter of 2025 was $20.0 million, a decline of 11.6% compared to $22.6 million in the prior year quarter. The comparable decline in income was primarily due to a smaller asset base following the funding of retroactive reinsurance structures for the E&S segment which were purchased in the second half of 2024.

The Company’s net investment income consisted of the following:

	Three Months Ended March 31,
*($ in thousands)*	2025		2024			*% Change*
Private Investments		200		(145	)	NM
All Other Investments		19,808		22,777		(13	)%
Total Net Investment Income	$	20,008	$	22,632		(12	)%

The Company’s annualized gross investment yield on average fixed maturity, bank loan and equity securities for the three months ended March 31, 2025 was 4.6% (versus 4.8% for the three months ended March 31, 2024).

Net realized and unrealized losses on investments of ($1.4) million for the three months ended March 31, 2025 compared to net realized and unrealized gains on investments of $4.6 million in the prior year quarter. The majority of the realized and unrealized losses during the quarter were related to realized losses on sales in our bank loan portfolio, partially offset by increases in the fair value of our preferred stock portfolio.

Discontinued Operations

In connection with the process outlined in the Stock Purchase Agreement, and as previously disclosed, the buyer of JRG Re claimed a $54.1 million downward adjustment to the closing purchase price, which the Company disputed. As per the Stock Purchase Agreement, the disputed items (totaling $54.1 million) were submitted to an independent accounting firm for final resolution. On April 18, 2025, the independent accounting firm issued its final determination which resulted in a small downward adjustment to the closing purchase price of $0.5 million. The determination by the independent accounting firm is final and binding with regards to the purchase price.

Capital Management

The Company announced that its Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.01 per common share. This dividend is payable on Monday, June 30, 2025 to all shareholders of record on Monday, June 9, 2025.

Tangible Common Equity Per Share

Shareholders’ equity of $484.5 million at March 31, 2025 increased 5.1% compared to shareholders’ equity of $460.9 million at December 31, 2024. Tangible common equity³ per share of $7.11 at March 31, 2025 increased 6.6% compared to tangible common equity per share of $6.67 at December 31, 2024, due to net income from continuing operations, partially offset by a small net loss from discontinued operations. Other comprehensive income benefited by $14.3 million during the first quarter of 2025, improving AOCI to ($55.7) million due to a decline in interest rates.

Conference Call

James River will hold a conference call to discuss its first quarter results tomorrow, May 6, 2025 at 8:00 a.m. Eastern Time. Investors may access the conference call by dialing (800) 715-9871, Conference ID 8501569, or via the internet by visiting www.jrvrgroup.com and clicking on the “Investor Relations” link. A webcast replay of the call will be available by visiting the company website.

Forward-Looking Statements

This press release contains forward-looking statements as that term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In some cases, such forward-looking statements may be identified by terms such as believe, expect, seek, may, will, should, intend, project, anticipate, plan, estimate, guidance or similar words. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. Although it is not possible to identify all of these risks and uncertainties, they include, among others, the following: the inherent uncertainty of estimating reserves and the possibility that incurred losses may be greater than our estimate used to compute loss and loss adjustment expense reserves; inaccurate estimates and judgments in our risk management may expose us to greater risks than intended; downgrades in the financial strength rating or outlook of our regulated insurance subsidiaries impacting our competitive position and ability to attract and retain insurance business that our subsidiaries write and ultimately our financial condition; the potential loss of key members of our management team or key employees, and our ability to attract and retain personnel; adverse economic and competitive factors resulting in the sale of fewer policies than expected or an increase in the frequency or severity of claims, or both; the impact of a higher than expected inflationary environment on our reserves, loss adjustment expenses, the values of our investments and investment returns, and our compensation expenses; exposure to credit risk, interest rate risk and other market risk in our investment portfolio and our reinsurers; reliance on a select group of brokers and agents for a significant portion of our business and the impact of our potential failure to maintain such relationships; reliance on a select group of customers for a significant portion of our business and the impact of our potential failure to maintain, or decision to terminate, such relationships; our ability to obtain insurance and reinsurance coverage at prices and on terms that allow us to transfer risk, adequately protect our Company against financial loss and that supports our growth plans; losses resulting from reinsurance counterparties failing to pay us on reinsurance claims, insurance companies with whom we have a fronting arrangement failing to pay us for claims, or a former customer with whom we have an indemnification arrangement failing to perform its reimbursement obligations, and our potential inability to demand or maintain adequate collateral to mitigate such risks; the inherent uncertainty of estimating reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses and the possibility that reinsurance may be less than our estimate of reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses; inadequacy of premiums we charge to compensate us for our losses incurred; changes in laws or government regulation, including tax or insurance laws and regulations; changes in U.S. tax laws (including associated regulations) and the interpretation of certain provisions applicable to insurance/reinsurance businesses with U.S. and non-U.S. operations, which may be retroactive and could have a significant effect on us including, among other things, by potentially increasing our tax rate, as well as on our shareholders; in the event we did not qualify for the insurance company exception to the passive foreign investment company (“PFIC”) rules and were therefore considered a PFIC, there could be material adverse tax consequences to an investor that is subject to U.S. federal income taxation; the Company or its foreign subsidiary becoming subject to U.S. federal income taxation; a failure of any of the loss limitations or exclusions we utilize to shield us from unanticipated financial losses or legal exposures, or other liabilities; losses from catastrophic events, such as natural disasters and terrorist acts, which substantially exceed our expectations and/or exceed the amount of reinsurance we have purchased to protect us from such events; potential effects on our business of emerging claim and coverage issues; the potential impact of internal or external fraud, operational errors, systems malfunctions or cyber security incidents; our ability to manage our growth effectively; failure to maintain effective internal controls in accordance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended; changes in our financial condition, regulations or other factors that may restrict our subsidiaries’ ability to pay us dividends; and an adverse result in any litigation or legal proceedings we are or may become subject to. Additional information about these risks and uncertainties, as well as others that may cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements, is contained in our filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), including our most recently filed Annual Report on Form 10-K. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this release and the Company does not undertake any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking information to reflect changes in assumptions, the occurrence of unanticipated events, or otherwise.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

In presenting James River Group Holdings, Ltd.’s results, management has included financial measures that are not calculated under standards or rules that comprise accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”). Such measures, including underwriting (loss) profit, adjusted net operating (loss) income, tangible equity, tangible common equity, and adjusted net operating return on tangible equity (which is calculated as annualized adjusted net operating income divided by the average quarterly tangible equity balances in the respective period), are referred to as non-GAAP measures. These non-GAAP measures may be defined or calculated differently by other companies. These measures should not be viewed as a substitute for those measures determined in accordance with GAAP. Reconciliations of such measures to the most comparable GAAP figures are included at the end of this press release.

About James River Group Holdings, Ltd.

James River Group Holdings, Ltd. is a Bermuda-based insurance holding company that owns and operates a group of specialty insurance companies. The Company operates in two specialty property-casualty insurance segments: Excess and Surplus Lines and Specialty Admitted Insurance. Each of the Company’s regulated insurance subsidiaries are rated “A-” (Excellent) by A.M. Best Company.

Visit James River Group Holdings, Ltd. on the web at www.jrvrgroup.com

For more information contact:

Zachary Shytle
Senior Analyst, Investments and Investor Relations
980-249-6848
InvestorRelations@james-river-group.com


James River Group Holdings, Ltd. and Subsidiaries Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet Data (Unaudited)

*($ in thousands, except for share data)*	March 31, 2025		December 31, 2024
ASSETS
Invested assets:
Fixed maturity securities, available-for-sale, at fair value	$	1,259,627	$	1,189,733
Equity securities, at fair value		87,746		86,479
Bank loan participations, at fair value		144,014		142,410
Short-term investments		79,091		97,074
Other invested assets		52,768		36,700
Total invested assets		1,623,246		1,552,396

Cash and cash equivalents		279,427		362,345
Restricted cash equivalents (a)		29,012		28,705
Accrued investment income		10,567		10,534
Premiums receivable and agents’ balances, net		205,965		243,882
Reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses, net		1,984,292		1,996,913
Reinsurance recoverable on paid losses		127,627		101,210
Deferred policy acquisition costs		27,844		30,175
Goodwill and intangible assets		214,190		214,281
Other assets		446,845		466,635
Total assets	$	4,949,015	$	5,007,076

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Reserve for losses and loss adjustment expenses	$	3,081,540	$	3,084,406
Unearned premiums		526,506		572,034
Funds held (a)		25,157		25,157
Deferred reinsurance gain		56,042		57,970
Senior debt		225,800		200,800
Junior subordinated debt		104,055		104,055
Accrued expenses		39,196		53,178
Other liabilities		273,124		315,446
Total liabilities		4,331,420		4,413,046

Series A redeemable preferred shares		133,115		133,115
Total shareholders’ equity		484,480		460,915
Total liabilities, Series A redeemable preferred shares, and shareholders’ equity	$	4,949,015	$	5,007,076

Tangible equity (b)	$	459,447	$	437,719
Tangible equity per share (b)	$	7.73	$	7.40
Tangible common equity per share (b)	$	7.11	$	6.67
Shareholders’ equity per share	$	10.56	$	10.10
Common shares outstanding		45,892,706		45,644,318

(a) Restricted cash equivalents and the funds held liability includes funds posted by the Company to a trust account for the benefit of a third party administrator handling the claims on the Rasier commercial auto policies in run-off. Such funds held in trust secure the Company’s obligations to reimburse the administrator for claims payments, and are primarily sourced from the collateral posted to the Company by Rasier and its affiliates to support their obligations under the indemnity agreements and the loss portfolio transfer reinsurance agreement with the Company.
(b) See “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures”


James River Group Holdings, Ltd. and Subsidiaries Condensed Consolidated Income Statement Data (Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended March 31,
*($ in thousands, except for share data)*		2025			2024
REVENUES
Gross written premiums	$	294,361		$	330,810
Net written premiums		127,956			138,172

Net earned premiums		151,902			171,691
Net investment income		20,008			22,632
Net realized and unrealized (losses) gains on investments		(1,371	)		4,583
Other income		1,750			2,221
Total revenues		172,289			201,127

EXPENSES
Losses and loss adjustment expenses (a)		99,525			110,049
Other operating expenses		50,560			50,810
Other expenses		563			732
Interest expense		5,541			6,485
Intangible asset amortization and impairment		91			91
Total expenses		156,280			168,167
Income from continuing operations before income taxes		16,009			32,960
Income tax expense on continuing operations		5,021			9,452
Net income from continuing operations		10,988			23,508
Net loss from discontinued operations		(1,414	)		(8,105	)
NET INCOME		9,574			15,403
Dividends on Series A preferred shares		(1,969	)		(2,625	)
NET INCOME AVAILABLE TO COMMON SHAREHOLDERS	$	7,605		$	12,778
ADJUSTED NET OPERATING INCOME (b)	$	9,102		$	14,832

INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE
Basic
Continuing operations	$	0.20		$	0.55
Discontinued operations	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.21	)
	$	0.17		$	0.34
Diluted
Continuing operations (c)	$	0.18		$	0.53
Discontinued operations	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.18	)
	$	0.16		$	0.35

ADJUSTED NET OPERATING INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
Basic	$	0.20		$	0.39
Diluted (c)	$	0.19		$	0.39

Weighted-average common shares outstanding:
Basic		45,803,501			37,733,710
Diluted		59,659,075			44,638,969
Cash dividends declared per common share	$	0.01		$	0.05

Ratios:
Loss ratio		66.8	%		66.4	%
Expense ratio (d)		32.7	%		28.9	%
Combined ratio		99.5	%		95.3	%
Accident year loss ratio (e)		65.5	%		66.7	%

(a) Losses and loss adjustment expenses include benefits of $1.9 million and $4.0 million for deferred retroactive reinsurance gains (benefits) for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.
(b) See “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures”.
(c) The outstanding Series A preferred shares were dilutive in both periods. Dividends on the Series A preferred shares were added back to the numerator of the calculation and common shares from an assumed conversion of the Series A preferred shares were included in the denominator.
(d) Calculated with a numerator comprising other operating expenses less gross fee income (in specific instances when the Company is not retaining insurance risk) included in “Other income” in our Condensed Consolidated Income Statements of $0.8 million and $1.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.
(e) Ratio of losses and loss adjustment expenses for the current accident year, excluding development on prior accident year reserves, to net earned premiums for the current year (excluding net earned premium adjustments on certain reinsurance treaties with reinstatement premiums associated with prior years).


James River Group Holdings, Ltd. and Subsidiaries Segment Results

EXCESS AND SURPLUS LINES

	Three Months Ended March 31,
*($ in thousands)*		2025			2024		% Change
Gross written premiums	$	213,243		$	213,691		(0.2	)%
Net written premiums	$	115,079		$	117,425		(2.0	)%

Net earned premiums	$	137,028		$	145,623		(5.9	)%
Losses and loss adjustment expenses excluding retroactive reinsurance		(88,804	)		(93,605	)	(5.1	)%
Underwriting expenses		(36,566	)		(33,527	)	9.1	%
Underwriting profit (a)	$	11,658		$	18,491		(37.0	)%

Ratios:
Loss ratio		64.8	%		64.3	%
Expense ratio		26.7	%		23.0	%
Combined ratio		91.5	%		87.3	%
Accident year loss ratio (b)		63.4	%		64.3	%

(a) See “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures”.
(b) Ratio of losses and loss adjustment expenses for the current accident year, excluding development on prior accident year reserves, to net earned premiums for the current year (excluding net earned premium adjustments on certain reinsurance treaties with reinstatement premiums associated with prior years).


SPECIALTY ADMITTED INSURANCE

	Three Months Ended March 31,
*($ in thousands)*		2025			2024		% Change
Gross written premiums	$	81,118		$	117,119		(30.7	)%
Net written premiums	$	12,877		$	20,747		(37.9	)%

Net earned premiums	$	14,874		$	26,068		(42.9	)%
Losses and loss adjustment expenses		(12,649	)		(20,446	)	(38.1	)%
Underwriting expenses		(2,531	)		(4,836	)	(47.7	)%
Underwriting profit (a), (b)	$	(306	)	$	786		—

Ratios:
Loss ratio		85.0	%		78.4	%
Expense ratio		17.1	%		18.6	%
Combined ratio		102.1	%		97.0	%
Accident year loss ratio		85.9	%		80.1	%

(a) See “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures”.
(b) Underwriting results for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024 include gross fee income of $4.3 million and $5.3 million, respectively.

Underwriting Performance Ratios

The following table provides the underwriting performance ratios of the Company’s continuing operations inclusive of the business subject to retroactive reinsurance accounting. There is no economic impact to the Company over the life of a retroactive reinsurance contract so long as any additional losses subject to the contract are within the limit of the contract and the counterparty performs under the contract. Retroactive reinsurance accounting is not indicative of our current and ongoing operations. Management believes that providing loss ratios and combined ratios on business not subject to retroactive reinsurance accounting gives the users of our financial statements useful information in evaluating our current and ongoing operations.

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2025		2024
Excess and Surplus Lines:
Loss Ratio	64.8	%	64.3	%
Impact of retroactive reinsurance	(1.4	)%	(2.7	)%
Loss Ratio including impact of retroactive reinsurance	63.4	%	61.6	%

Combined Ratio	91.5	%	87.3	%
Impact of retroactive reinsurance	(1.4	)%	(2.7	)%
Combined Ratio including impact of retroactive reinsurance	90.1	%	84.6	%

Consolidated:
Loss Ratio	66.8	%	66.4	%
Impact of retroactive reinsurance	(1.3	)%	(2.3	)%
Loss Ratio including impact of retroactive reinsurance	65.5	%	64.1	%

Combined Ratio	99.5	%	95.3	%
Impact of retroactive reinsurance	(1.3	)%	(2.3	)%
Combined Ratio including impact of retroactive reinsurance	98.2	%	93.0	%

RECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP MEASURES

Underwriting Profit

The following table reconciles the underwriting profit by individual operating segment and for the entire Company to consolidated income from continuing operations before taxes. We believe that the disclosure of underwriting profit by individual segment and of the Company as a whole is useful to investors, analysts, rating agencies and other users of our financial information in evaluating our performance because our objective is to consistently earn underwriting profits. We evaluate the performance of our segments and allocate resources based primarily on underwriting profit. We define underwriting profit as net earned premiums and gross fee income (in specific instances when the Company is not retaining insurance risk) less losses and loss adjustment expenses on business from continuing operations not subject to retroactive reinsurance accounting and other operating expenses. Other operating expenses include the underwriting, acquisition, and insurance expenses of the operating segments and, for consolidated underwriting profit, the expenses of the Corporate and Other segment. Our definition of underwriting profit may not be comparable to that of other companies.

	Three Months Ended March 31,
*($ in thousands)*		2025			2024
Underwriting profit of the operating segments:
Excess and Surplus Lines	$	11,658		$	18,491
Specialty Admitted Insurance		(306	)		786
Total underwriting profit of operating segments		11,352			19,277
Other operating expenses of the Corporate and Other segment		(10,631	)		(11,137	)
Underwriting profit (a)		721			8,140
Losses and loss adjustment expenses – retroactive reinsurance		1,928			4,002
Net investment income		20,008			22,632
Net realized and unrealized gains on investments		(1,371	)		4,583
Other income (expense)		355			179
Interest expense		(5,541	)		(6,485	)
Amortization of intangible assets		(91	)		(91	)
Income from continuing operations before taxes	$	16,009		$	32,960

(a) Included in underwriting results for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024 is gross fee income of $4.3 million and $5.3 million, respectively.

Adjusted Net Operating Income

We define adjusted net operating income as income available to common shareholders excluding a) income (loss) from discontinued operations, b) the impact of retroactive reinsurance accounting, c) net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments, d) certain non-operating expenses such as professional service fees related to certain lawsuits, various strategic initiatives, and the filing of registration statements for the offering of securities, e) severance costs associated with terminated employees, and f) deemed dividends recorded with the amendment of the Series A Preferred Shares. Adjusted net operating income should not be viewed as a substitute for net income calculated in accordance with GAAP, and our definition of adjusted net operating income may not be comparable to that of other companies.

Our income available to common shareholders reconciles to our adjusted net operating income as follows:

	Three Months Ended March 31,
		2025						2024
*($ in thousands)*	Income Before Taxes			Net Income			Income Before Taxes			Net Income
Income available to common shareholders	$	12,626		$	7,605		$	22,230		$	12,778
Loss from discontinued operations		1,414			1,414			8,105			8,105
Losses and loss adjustment expenses – retroactive reinsurance		(1,928	)		(1,523	)		(4,002	)		(3,162	)
Net realized and unrealized investment losses (gains)		1,371			1,083			(4,583	)		(3,621	)
Other expenses		563			523			732			732
Adjusted net operating income	$	14,046		$	9,102		$	22,482		$	14,832

Tangible Equity (per Share) and Tangible Common Equity (per Share)

We define tangible equity as shareholders’ equity plus mezzanine Series A Preferred Shares and the deferred retroactive reinsurance gain less goodwill and intangible assets, net of amortization. Tangible equity per share represents tangible equity divided by the sum of total common shares outstanding plus the common shares resulting from an assumed conversion of the outstanding Series A Preferred Shares into common shares (at the conversion price effective as of the last day of the applicable period). We define tangible common equity as tangible equity less mezzanine Series A Preferred Shares and tangible common equity per share represents tangible common equity divided by the total common shares outstanding. Our definitions of tangible equity and tangible equity per share may not be comparable to that of other companies, and they should not be viewed as a substitute for shareholders’ equity and shareholders’ equity per share calculated in accordance with GAAP. We use tangible equity and tangible common equity internally to evaluate the strength of our balance sheet and to compare returns relative to this measure. The following table reconciles shareholders’ equity to tangible equity and tangible common equity for March 31, 2025, December 31, 2024, March 31, 2024, and December 31, 2023.

	March 31, 2025		December 31, 2024		March 31, 2024		December 31, 2023
*($ in thousands, except for share data)*
Shareholders’ equity	$	484,480	$	460,915	$	539,537	$	534,621
Plus: Series A redeemable preferred shares		133,115		133,115		144,898		144,898
Plus: Deferred reinsurance gain		56,042		57,970		16,731		20,733
Less: Goodwill and intangible assets		214,190		214,281		214,553		214,644
Tangible equity	$	459,447	$	437,719	$	486,613	$	485,608
Less: Series A redeemable preferred shares		133,115		133,115		144,898		144,898
Tangible common equity	$	326,332	$	304,604	$	341,715	$	340,710

Common shares outstanding		45,892,706		45,644,318		37,822,340		37,641,563
Common shares from assumed conversion of Series A preferred shares		13,521,635		13,521,635		6,750,567		5,971,184
Common shares outstanding after assumed conversion of Series A preferred shares		59,414,341		59,165,953		44,572,907		43,612,747

Equity per share:
Shareholders’ equity	$	10.56	$	10.10	$	14.27	$	14.20
Tangible equity	$	7.73	$	7.40	$	10.92	$	11.13
Tangible common equity	$	7.11	$	6.67	$	9.03	$	9.05

_______________
¹ Adjusted net operating income, tangible common equity and adjusted net operating return on tangible common equity are non-GAAP financial measures. See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” and “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures” at the end of this press release.
² The Company closed the sale of JRG Reinsurance Company Ltd. on April 16, 2024. The full financials for our former Casualty Reinsurance segment have been classified to discontinued operations for all periods and includes the final adjustment determination to the closing purchase price pursuant to the Stock Purchase Agreement.
³ Tangible common equity is a non-GAAP financial measures. See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” and “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures” at the end of this press release.

The MIL Network –

May 6, 2025

MIL-OSI Security: Baltimore Man Charged in Second Superseding Indictment for Robbery, Kidnapping, and Shooting Death in Queens

Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) State Crime Alerts (c)

Defendant Jalon Lenny Garrett is One of Six Defendants Arrested in Connection with the July 25, 2024 Crime Spree

Earlier today, a seven-count second superseding indictment was unsealed in federal court in Brooklyn charging Jalon Lenny Garrett, also known as “Lips,” Marcus Pittman, also known as “Nacho” and “Cheese,” Delonta Pittman, also known as “D Lo,” and Jerome Waters, also known as “the Engineer” and “Rome,” for their alleged roles in the kidnapping, robbery, and shooting of marijuana dealers on July 25, 2024. Garrett was arrested this morning in Baltimore, Maryland, and will make his initial appearance in the Eastern District of New York at a later date. Marcus Pittman is also newly charged with being a felon in possession of ammunition for his role in the fatal shooting. The remaining defendants are already in custody and will be arraigned at a later date.

John J. Durham, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York; Christopher G. Raia, Assistant Director in Charge, Federal Bureau of Investigation, New York Field Office (FBI); and Jessica S. Tisch, Commissioner, New York City Police Department (NYPD) announced the arrests and charges.

“As alleged, the defendants took part in an interstate armed robbery and kidnapping scheme that resulted in the brutal murder of a targeted victim. This prosecution underscores the ongoing threat of guns and drugs in our communities,” stated United States Attorney Durham. “This Office is committed to holding violent offenders accountable and ensuring justice for every victim.”

“These four defendants allegedly traveled across the northeast to brutally kidnap and rob two unsuspecting individuals, ultimately murdering one of the victims,” stated FBI Assistant Director-in-Charge Raia. “This alleged fatal robbery highlights the volatile and random violence that the illicit drug trade can fuel. With our law enforcement partners, the FBI will continue to dismantle any organization implementing lethal tactics to bolster their criminal lifestyles and jeopardize the safety of our city.”

“These individuals came to New York City armed with guns and zip ties — ready to rob, kidnap, and kill,” stated NYPD Commissioner Tisch. “It was a deliberate, brutal attack meant to terrorize our communities. They thought they could hit and run. They were wrong — and anyone else thinking the same should take note. I’m grateful to our partners in Project Safe Neighborhoods for their shared commitment to protecting New Yorkers.”

According to the superseding indictment and other public court filings, the defendants are members of a Baltimore-based robbery crew that conspired to commit an armed robbery and kidnapping of marijuana dealers in Queens, New York. On the evening of July 24,2024, the defendants and their co-conspirators executed a violent armed robbery and kidnapping plot that resulted in John Doe #1’s death. As described below, Garrett robbed and kidnapped John Doe #2 at gunpoint, and Marcus Pittman shot and killed John Doe #1.

Specifically, the defendants drove from Maryland to New York for the purpose of robbing two drug dealers, John Doe #1 and John Doe #2. Once in New York, defendants Jerome Waters and William Barnett met with John Doe #1 and John Doe #2 at a stash house in Queens, New York, under the guise of purchasing marijuana.

At the stash house, Waters and Barnett pulled out their weapons and held up John Doe #1 and John Doe #2 at gunpoint. Next, they let their co-defendants into the stash house to assist in the robbery and kidnapping. While in the stash house, the defendants and their co-conspirators tied up John Doe #1 and John Doe #2 with zip ties and forced them outside and into the back of a Jeep and a U-Haul van, which were driven by Barnett and Israel. At the same time, the defendants and their co-conspirators stole approximately 30 pounds of marijuana from the stash house.

The defendants and their co-conspirators drove John Doe #1 and John Doe #2, who were still tied up, through Queens at gunpoint, demanding drugs and money. Garrett held a gun to John Doe #2 as he was being driven through Queens. Marcus Pittman shot John Doe #1 to death in the back of the U-Haul van. When his body was found by first responders, John Doe #1 still had a zip tie binding one of his hands and was surrounded by bags of marijuana. After the shooting, the defendants fled back to Maryland.

If convicted, defendants Marcus Pittman, Delonta Pittman, and Waters each face mandatory minimum sentences of life imprisonment, and Garrett faces a mandatory minimum of ten years’ imprisonment and a maximum sentence of life imprisonment. The charges in the superseding indictment are allegations and the defendants are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.

This case was brought as part of Project Safe Neighborhoods (PSN), a program bringing together all levels of law enforcement and the communities they serve to reduce violent crime and make our neighborhoods safer for everyone. As part of the program, U.S. Attorneys’ Offices work in partnership with federal, state, local and tribal law enforcement and their local communities to develop effective, locally based strategies to reduce violent crime.

The government’s case is being handled by the Office’s International Narcotics and Money Laundering Section. Assistant United States Attorneys Chand Edwards-Balfour and Adam Amir are in charge of the prosecution, with the assistance of Paralegal Specialist Samuel Ronchetti.

New Defendant:

JALON LENNY GARRETT
Age: 20
Maryland

Previously Charged Defendants:

MARCUS PITTMAN (also known as “Nacho” and “Cheese”)
Age: 30
Maryland

DELONTA PITTMAN (also known as “D Lo”)
Age: 31
Maryland

JEROME WATERS (also known as “the Engineer” and “Rome”)
Age: 23
Maryland

CALVIN ISRAEL
Age: 23
Maryland

WILLIAM BARNETT
Age: 27
Maryland

E.D.N.Y. Docket No. 24-CR-413 (S-2) (KAM)

MIL Security OSI –

May 6, 2025

MIL-OSI Security: Former PICC Correctional Officer and Two Co-Conspirators Plead Guilty to Scheme to Smuggle Contraband Into the Prison Facility

Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) State Crime Alerts (c)

PHILADELPHIA – United States Attorney David Metcalf announced that Breyanna Cornish, 30, Jawayne Brown, 40, and Ahmad Nasir, aka Hussain Abdussamad, 44, all of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, entered pleas of guilty before United States District Court Judge Gerald J. Pappert this week in connection with a scheme to smuggle contraband — including drugs, phones, chargers, cigarettes, and knives — into the Philadelphia Industrial Correctional Center (“PICC”) from April through July of 2021.

The defendants were charged by indictment in August of last year, with Nasir pleading guilty this morning to one count of conspiracy to commit federal program bribery, one count of federal program bribery, one count of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute a mixture and substance containing a detectable amount of buprenorphine, and one count of possession with intent to distribute a mixture and substance containing a detectable amount of buprenorphine.

Brown pleaded guilty on Monday to one count of conspiracy to commit federal program bribery, one count of federal program bribery, and one count of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute a mixture and substance containing a detectable amount of buprenorphine.

Cornish pleaded guilty on Monday to one count of conspiracy to commit federal program bribery and one count of federal program bribery.

As detailed in court filings and admitted to by the defendants, Nasir, who was then detained pre-trial at PICC, worked with Brown, who was not incarcerated, Cornish, who was then a PICC correctional officer (“CO”) employed by the Philadelphia Department of Prisons (“PDP”), and several other associates to purchase and assemble contraband. Cornish then smuggled the contraband into PICC, where Nasir sold the contraband to other inmates for a profit. Nasir then instructed associates to pay Cornish for her role smuggling the contraband into the prison and Brown for his work purchasing and assembling the packages.

On July 10, 2021, PDP conducted a search of the cell Nasir shared with another inmate. In a compartment in the ceiling behind a light fixture, officers recovered 19 cellphones, 20 cellphone chargers, one rapid charger, two super glues, two screwdrivers, one roll of tape, three hunting knives, one Ziploc bag containing the synthetic cannabinoid commonly known as K2, one Ziploc bag of tobacco, one alprazolam pill, and at least 110 packets of Suboxone.

Following the search of the cell, officers conducted a search of Nasir and his cellmate. Officers recovered a cellphone from the person of each of them. Text messages and WhatsApp messages extracted from the cell phone recovered from Nasir’s person revealed that from June 19, 2021, to July 6, 2021, CO Cornish, Nasir, and Brown discussed via text specific contraband items to be acquired, the delivery of contraband packages, and payments for the items and to co-conspirators. Nasir simultaneously sent messages to multiple inmates about the purchase and delivery of contraband.

The defendants are scheduled to be sentenced in August. Cornish faces a maximum possible term of 15 years’ imprisonment, Brown a maximum possible term of 25 years’ imprisonment, and Nasir a maximum possible term of 35 years’ imprisonment.

The case was investigated by the FBI, with significant assistance from the Philadelphia Department of Prisons, and is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Meghan Claiborne and Ruth Mandelbaum.

MIL Security OSI –

May 6, 2025

MIL-OSI Security: Former Amtrak Director of Network Planning and Engineering, Two Vendors Indicted for Extensive Bribery Scheme

Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) State Crime Alerts (c)

PHILADELPHIA – United States Attorney David Metcalf announced that Richard Thompson, 57, of Falls Church, Virginia, Shaun Hanrahan, 66, of Hampton, Virginia, and Darren Hannam, 57, of Haymarket, Virginia, were charged by indictment with honest services fraud through bribery for engaging in schemes to pay off Thompson, in exchange for Thompson steering millions of dollars in Amtrak work to companies owned by Hanrahan, Hannam, and others.

Thompson was the Director of Network Planning and Engineering for Amtrak and had a leadership role in designing information technology (“IT”) systems and selecting IT vendors and subcontractors to perform IT work for Amtrak. Hanrahan was the owner of Awarity, LLC, a small business providing management consulting and computer-related services. Hannam and Co-schemer #1 were the principals of Arch Technology, an IT company.

The indictment alleges that, from about 2015 through 2021, Thompson engaged in bribery schemes with each of three companies who were his favored vendors in the Amtrak contracting process — Awarity, Arch Technology, and 20/20 Teknology, owned by Co-schemer #2. In each of these schemes, as alleged, Thompson repeatedly shared proprietary Amtrak bid information and other documents with his favored vendors before Amtrak contracts were awarded, giving the favored vendors advantages in the Amtrak contracting processes.

The indictment further alleges that Thompson likewise collaborated with them on bid and contracting documents, manipulated bidding lists, and structured existing contractual relationships, so that his favored vendors would get lucrative subcontracting deals and bypass Amtrak’s competitive bidding process. The defendants allegedly tried to conceal their scheme from Amtrak and other authorities by communicating with Thompson on his personal email accounts rather than his Amtrak email.

The Amtrak work involved in these schemes included, among other things, the design and installation of nationwide WiFi networks, IT equipment purchases, the installation of audio-visual equipment in Amtrak’s offices in Washington, DC, and a major project to improve the gates that provided access to Amtrak railroad tracks across the country. According to the indictment, for steering and attempting to steer this work to his favored vendors, Thompson received a stream of benefits from each vendor. For example, Hanrahan provided Thompson with payments of cash totaling at least $97,000; Hannam and Co-schemer #1 provided Thompson with expensive electronics valued at approximately $9,500, including Apple computers. Co-schemer #2 provided Thompson with an automobile, free hotel and condominium stays in Ocean City, Maryland, and $40,000 in cash.

The defendants are all charged with multiple counts of honest services wire fraud through bribery. Hannam is also charged with falsification of records for allegedly trying to cover up the scheme after federal agents executed search warrants in this matter.

If convicted, the defendants face maximum possible sentences of 20 years in prison for each count of honest services fraud in the indictment.

The case was investigated by the FBI and the Amtrak Office of Inspector General and is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Louis D. Lappen and Jason Grenell.

The charges and allegations contained in the indictment are merely accusations. Every defendant is presumed to be innocent unless and until proven guilty in court.

MIL Security OSI –

May 6, 2025

MIL-OSI Security: Boston City Councilor Pleads Guilty to Federal Public Corruption Charges

Source: Office of United States Attorneys

City Councilor for Boston’s District 7, Tania Fernandes Anderson, pocketed $7,000 cash from staff member’s city-funded bonus

BOSTON – Boston City Councilor Tania Fernandes Anderson pleaded guilty today in federal court in Boston to public corruption charges after receiving a $7,000 kickback from a staff member’s city funded bonus.

Tania Fernandes Anderson, 46, of Boston, pleaded guilty to one count of wire fraud and one count of theft concerning a program receiving federal funds. U.S. District Court Judge Indira Talwani scheduled sentencing for July 29, 2025. Fernandes Anderson was indicted in December 2024. Per the plea agreement, the government is recommending a sentence of one year and one day in prison to be followed by three years of supervised release and restitution in the amount of $13,000.

“Councilor Fernandes Anderson abused her position of trust for personal gain and turned a public checkbook into her own private slush fund. Her constituents deserve better than this. They deserve a city representative who respects the role of public service and does not use the power and position to line her own pockets,” said United States Attorney Leah B. Foley. “Her guilty plea today says what she refuses to admit in her media interviews: she broke the law, lied to the public, and used her office for her own personal gain. Ms. Fernandes Anderson leaves a legacy not of a selfless trailblazer, but one of fraud, greed, and deceit. The United States Attorney’s Office is committed to ensuring elected officials are held accountable for this kind of corruption and dishonesty.”

“Tania Fernandes Anderson used the city of Boston. She wielded her official powers for her own financial gain, and grossly betrayed the trust of the residents she was elected to serve,” said James Crowley, Acting Special Agent in Charge of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Boston Division. “Insidious corruption like this undermines people’s faith in, and expectations of, their government. Today’s conviction should reinforce, to both Boston’s politicos and the public, that the FBI remains committed to bringing to justice any elected official who deprives constituents of the honest services to which they are entitled.”

“The guilty plea of Tania Fernandes Anderson demonstrates IRS-CI’s commitment to identifying, investigating, and prosecuting all instances of public corruption, both in the Commonwealth and across New England,” said Thomas Demeo, Acting Special Agent in Charge of the Internal Revenue Service Criminal Investigation, Boston Field Office. “Elected officials are held to a higher standard when they take an oath to serve their constituents, but Fernandes Anderson forsook this oath when she conspired to orchestrate a kickback scheme to enrich herself at the cost of the American taxpayers.”

Fernandes Anderson currently serves as City Councilor for Boston’s District 7, which includes Roxbury, Dorchester, Fenway and part of the South End. She was first elected to a two-year term in November 2021 and won re-election in November 2023.

In or about 2022, Fernandes Anderson hired two members of her immediate family as salaried employees of her City Councilor Staff. Because City Councilors are prohibited by law from hiring immediate family members to their paid staff, Fernandes Anderson was required to terminate their salaried employment in or about August 2022. Additionally, in May 2023, the Massachusetts State Ethics Commission notified Fernandes Anderson that it would be seeking a $5,000 civil penalty payment from her as a result of the violation.

In or about November 2022, Fernandes Anderson emailed a City of Boston employee regarding her hiring of Staff Member A – a relative of Fernandes Anderson who was not an immediate family member – as a salaried employee. In her email to the City of Boston employee, Fernandes Anderson falsely represented that she and Staff Member A were not related:

From in or about early to mid-2023, Fernandes Anderson was facing personal financial difficulty, which included the outstanding $5,000 civil penalty payment to the Ethics Commission. In or about early May 2023, Fernandes Anderson told Staff Member A that she would give them extra pay in the form of a large bonus, but that Staff Member A would have to give a portion of the bonus back to Fernandes Anderson. Staff Member A agreed to the arrangement with Fernandes Anderson.

On May 3, 2023, Fernandes Anderson emailed a City of Boston employee instructing them to process a $13,000 bonus for Staff Member A – more than twice the total bonuses given to her other staff – without disclosing the repayment arrangement. Staff Member A deposited the check on May 26, 2023 and, following Fernandes Anderson’s instructions, made three separate cash withdrawals over the following weeks in the amounts of $3,000; $3,000; and $4,000. Following the last withdrawal on June 9, 2023, the two met in a bathroom at Boston City Hall, where Staff Member A handed Fernandes Anderson $7,000 in cash.

According to the signed plea agreement, in 2022 and 2023, Fernandes Anderson used funds from her campaign account for her own personal enrichment, and not for campaign-related expenses. Additionally, for tax years 2021, 2022 and 2023, Fernandes Anderson filed fraudulent federal income tax returns with the IRS. Specifically, Fernandes Anderson omitted approximately $11,000 in income that she earned from a Massachusetts-based corporation from her 2021 tax return; willfully omitted campaign funds that she used for her own personal enrichment from her 2022 and 2023 tax returns; and willfully omitted the $7,000 kickback that she received from Staff Member A from her 2023 tax return.

The charge of wire fraud provides for a sentence of up to 20 years in prison, three years of supervised release and a fine of up to $250,000. The charge of theft concerning programs receiving federal funds provides for a sentence of up to 10 years in prison, three years of supervised release and a fine of up to $250,000. Sentences are imposed by a federal district court judge based upon the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and statutes which govern the determination of a sentence in a criminal case.

U.S. Attorney Foley, FBI Acting SAC Crowley and IRS Acting SAC Demeo made the announcement today. Assistant U.S. Attorneys John T. Mulcahy and Dustin Chao of the Public Corruption & Special Prosecutions Unit are prosecuting the case.

MIL Security OSI –

May 6, 2025

MIL-OSI Security: Ohio Man Sentenced to 27 Years in Prison After Admitting to Sexually Abusing and Exploiting Minors

Source: Office of United States Attorneys

TOLEDO, Ohio – Michael D. Aspinwall, 38, of Toledo, Ohio, was sentenced to 27 years in prison by U.S. District Judge James R. Knepp, after he admitted to creating and distributing child sexual abuse materials (CSAM). Aspinwall pleaded guilty to one count of sexual exploitation of a minor and one count of receipt and distribution of child pornography. He was also ordered to serve lifetime supervised release after imprisonment and register as a sex offender, per the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act.

According to court documents, from about Oct. 1, 2023 to Feb. 9, 2024, Aspinwall admitted to producing sexual abuse materials of children and sending and receiving the digital files through mobile applications. FBI-Toledo, along with the assistance of Toledo Police officers, executed a search warrant on Feb. 9, 2024, and seized the defendant’s cellphone which was found to contain sexually explicit photos and videos of minors, including infants and toddlers. Additionally, during conversations with an online covert investigator, Aspinwall admitted to sexually abusing children−whom he babysat−while they were sleeping.

The investigation was conducted by the FBI Toledo Field Office and the Toledo Police Department. This case was prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Sara Al-Sorghali for the Northern District of Ohio.

To report child exploitation, please visit cybertipline.org, or call 1-800-843-5678, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.

MIL Security OSI –

May 6, 2025

MIL-OSI Security: Two Men Sentenced for Roles in Straw Purchase of a Firearm

Source: United States Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Explosives (ATF)

CHARLESTON, S.C. — Joshua Paul Stewart Turner, 25, of Summerville, and Noah Olen Fowler, 26, of Moncks Corner, have each been sentenced for their roles in a conspiracy to straw-purchase a firearm.

Evidence obtained in the investigation revealed that Fowler, knowing Turner was prohibited from possessing and/or purchasing a firearm, purchased a firearm for Turner. During the purchase of the firearm, Fowler false certified on the ATF Form 4473 that he was purchasing the firearm for himself. Evidence also revealed that Turner sent Fowler information on which firearm to purchase and, further, paid him for the firearm via CashApp. When Fowler purchased the firearm for Turner he was employed as a correctional officer at the Berkeley County Detention Center.

“Straw purchases undermine our efforts to keep firearms out of the hands of those legally prohibited from possessing them,” said U.S. Attorney Bryan Stirling for the District of South Carolina. “We’ll continue to work with our law enforcement partners to prosecute individuals who attempt to circumnavigate the proper procedure to purchase firearms.”

“Straw purchasing is a dangerous tactic that circumvents our laws and puts guns in the hands of prohibited individuals,” said ATF Special Agent in Charge Alicia Jones. “Whether you are the prohibited individual in possession of a firearm or the individual who lied to supply that firearm, both are considered threats to public safety and both face serious consequences.”

“Weapons in the hands of those prohibited from possessing them are a direct threat to public,” said Reid Davis, acting Special Agent in Charge of the FBI Columbia field office. “These sentences underscore the serious consequences of violating federal firearms laws and send a clear message: the FBI and our law enforcement partners are committed to ensuring those who violate these laws are held accountable.”

United States District Bruce H. Hendricks sentenced Turner to 20 months’ imprisonment, to be followed by a three-year term of court-ordered supervision. United States District Bruce H. Hendricks sentenced Fowler to a time-served sentence, to be followed by a three-year term of court-ordered supervision. There is no parole in the federal system.

This case was prosecuted under the new criminal provisions of the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act, which Congress enacted and the President signed in June 2022. The Act is the first federal statute specifically designed to target the unlawful trafficking and straw-purchasing of firearms.

This case was investigated by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, the FBI Columbia field office, and the Berkeley County Sheriff’s Office. Assistant U.S. Attorney Amy Bower is prosecuting the case.

###

MIL Security OSI –

May 6, 2025

MIL-OSI Security: Charlotte Clinic Owner Agrees to Settle Allegations of Medicaid Fraud

Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation FBI Crime News (b)

CHARLOTTE, N.C. – Steven Osbey, of Kernersville, N.C., has agreed to entry of a consent judgment against him in the amount of $4,711,159.00 in favor of the United States and State of North Carolina (the Governments), subject to a separate agreement regarding his participation in the Governments’ ability to pay process. The judgment represents repayment to the government for allegations that Reign & Inspirations, LLC (R&I), a clinic co-owned by Osbey and Aljihad Shabazz, charged Medicaid for physician home visits that never occurred.

More specifically, the Governments alleged Osbey and Shabazz conspired to carry out an extensive health care fraud scheme wherein they submitted or caused to be submitted claims to NC Medicaid for in-home physician visits with patients that simply never occurred—in all, billing more than 30,000 hours of these purported physician visits and sometimes billing as if the physician provided over 100 in-home visits in a single day, purportedly lasting an hour each (an obvious physical impossibility).

This investigation was conducted in parallel between the civil and criminal divisions of the U.S. Attorney’s Office. Shabazz pleaded guilty to criminal healthcare fraud conspiracy and money laundering charges and was sentenced to 52 months in prison followed by two years of supervised release.

The civil settlement obtained in this matter was the result of a coordinated effort between the Department of Justice and the FBI field offices in Charlotte, with assistance from the Medicaid Investigations Division of the North Carolina Attorney General’s Office, and the Office of Inspector General of the United States Department of Health and Human Services. AUSAs Caroline McLean and Seth Johnson were responsible for the civil investigation.

The investigation and resolution of this matter illustrates the government’s emphasis on combating health care fraud. One of the most powerful tools in this effort is the False Claims Act. Tips and complaints from all sources about potential fraud, waste, abuse, and mismanagement, can be reported to the Department of Health and Human Services at 800-HHS-TIPS (800-447-8477).

MIL Security OSI –

May 6, 2025

MIL-OSI USA: Duckworth, Kelly and Fellow Congressional Veterans Demand Accountability for Mishandling of Classified Information by Trump Administration

US Senate News:

Source: United States Senator for Illinois Tammy Duckworth
May 02, 2025
[WASHINGTON, D.C.] – Today, combat Veteran and U.S. Senator Tammy Duckworth (D-IL)—a member of both the U.S. Senate Armed Services Committee (SASC) and U.S. Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committee (SVAC)—joined fellow Veteran and SASC member Mark Kelly (D-AZ) and a group of Veteran colleagues in Congress in calling out President Trump and demanding accountability for the reckless mishandling of classified military information by senior administration officials. In the letter, the lawmakers called out Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, former National Security Advisor Mike Waltz, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard and CIA Director John Ratcliffe, specifically. The lawmakers warn that these actions put American servicemembers’ lives at risk and undermined the integrity of U.S. national security operations.
“This was a major security breach. There are appropriate and secure places and platforms that all officials are required to use to discuss sensitive and classified information without exposing it to adversaries. Signal is not the correct or DoD and IC sanctioned platform to discuss these matters. Longstanding DoD and IC policy has prohibited the use of unsecured devices and commercial apps for discussing sensitive information,” the lawmakers said.
As former servicemembers, Duckworth, Kelly and their colleagues emphasized the risk of this classified information landing in the wrong hands: “Had this information been released to the public, and more critically accessed by our adversaries, it could have had catastrophic consequences and resulted in American service members being wounded, captured, or killed, and mission failure. This is not an abstract or hypothetical scenario. In 2000, a Sailor on the USS Cole sent an email to his wife outlining the USS Cole’s port call schedule. This communication was intercepted and allowed the Al Qaeda terrorists in the region to orchestrate an attack on the USS Cole. This resulted in 17 Sailors killed and 39 injured and was a direct result of poor operational security.”
They continued: “To highlight Secretary Hegseth’s negligence and wanton disregard for the basic safeguarding of controlled information, even more reporting came out that indicated Secretary Hegseth had an internet connection that bypassed the Pentagon’s security protocol set up in his office to use the Signal messaging application on his personal computer. This unsecured internet line can expose users to hacking and malign surveillance.”
For this reason, the group of Veterans call on President Trump to fire Hegseth: “We expect our service members to put their lives on the line, and if necessary, die for this country, and the Secretary of Defense is flippantly incurring additional risk onto their mission, with no real justification other than expediency and because it’s easier to send a text than it is to do the right thing. We implore you to fire Mr. Hegseth on the grounds that his reckless handling of classified information put the men and women serving our nation at risk and displayed a terrible judgement that will erode confidence among service members.”
In addition to Duckworth and Kelly, the letter was co-signed by U.S. Representatives Salud Carbajal (D-CA-24), Ted Lieu (D-CA-36), Bobby Scott (D-VA-03), Jason Crow (D-CO-06) and Chrissy Houlahan (D-PA-06).
The full text of the letter is available on Senator Duckworth’s website.
-30-

MIL OSI USA News –

May 6, 2025

MIL-OSI Security: Westerville Man Sentenced to 20 Years in Prison for Aiding & Abetting Aggravated Postal Robberies, Firearms Crime

Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) State Crime Alerts (c)

COLUMBUS, Ohio – Cameron D. Newton, 21, was sentenced in U.S. District Court today to 240 months and one day in prison for his roles in four armed robberies against postal carriers.

According to court documents, between December 2022 and May 2023, Newton aided and abetted the aggravated robberies of mail and the use of a firearm during the crimes of violence.

Newton, who was on probation and consequently wearing a GPS ankle monitor at the time, recruited two juveniles to assist with an armed robbery in German Village on Dec. 22, 2022. Newton also arranged for the use of the handgun that his co-conspirator used during the crime.

On Jan. 23, 2023, Newton provided surveillance for an armed postal robbery on East Columbus Street. Newton was in his vehicle nearby, using the cover of making DoorDash deliveries to evade his home confinement.

Later that same day, Newton provided surveillance again for a third postal robbery and worked to arrange buyers for the stolen postal keys.

Newton also obtained a firearm for a co-conspirator to use in the May 11, 2023, robbery of an elderly female postal worker. He picked up accomplices near Goodale Park following the robbery. Newton then paid the robbers several hundred dollars via CashApp.

On May 18, 2023, law enforcement agents executed a search warrant at Newton’s residence and discovered $22,000 in cash, hundreds of washed and altered checks and money orders totaling more than $590,000, two Postal keys and hundreds of pieces of stolen mail.

A total of six defendants have been charged in connection with six separate armed robberies of postal carriers in central Ohio.

“Newton and his accomplices terrorized postal workers in an effort to steal their keys and loot mailboxes,” stated FBI Cincinnati Special Agent in Charge Elena Iatarola. “Through the hard work of the U.S. Postal Inspection Service, local police, and the FBI, we were able to arrest those responsible for these violent crimes and ensure they are held accountable.”

Kelly A. Norris, Acting United States Attorney for the Southern District of Ohio; Elena Iatarola, Special Agent in Charge, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Cincinnati Division; Lesley Allison, Inspector in Charge, U.S. Postal Inspection Service (USPIS); Columbus Police Chief Elaine Bryant; Westerville Police Chief Charles Chandler and Whitehall Police Chief Mike Crispen announced the sentence imposed this afternoon by U.S. District Judge Algenon L. Marbley. Assistant United States Attorney Noah R. Litton is representing the United States in these cases.

# # #

MIL Security OSI –

May 6, 2025

MIL-OSI Security: Prince George’s County Man Faces Federal Indictment for Sexual Exploitation of a Minor

Source: Office of United States Attorneys

Greenbelt, Maryland – A federal grand jury has indicted Joel Thomas Biermann, 46, of University Park, Maryland, for multiple child exploitation offenses. Biermann is charged with two counts of producing child sexual abuse material, one count of distributing child sexual abuse material, and one count of possessing child sexual abuse material.

Kelly O. Hayes, U.S. Attorney for the District of Maryland, announced the indictment with Special Agent in Charge William J. DelBagno of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) – Baltimore Field Office and Chief Malik Aziz of the Prince George’s County Police Department (PGPD).

According to the indictment, between approximately October 26, 2012, and October 28, 2024, Biermann employed, used, persuaded, induced, enticed, and coerced one or more victims to engage in sexually explicit conduct. Biermann also produced and possessed visual depictions of the exploitation. Additionally, the indictment alleges that Biermann distributed child sexual abuse material on March 13, 2016.

If convicted, Biermann faces a mandatory minimum of 15 years and a maximum of 30 years in federal prison for the production of child sexual abuse material; a mandatory minimum of five years and a maximum of 20 years for the distribution of child sexual abuse material; and a maximum of 20 years for possession of child sexual abuse material. Actual sentences for federal crimes are typically less than the maximum penalties. A federal district court judge determines sentencing after considering the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors.

An indictment is not a finding of guilt. Individuals charged by indictment are presumed innocent until proven guilty at a later criminal proceeding.

This case was brought as part of Project Safe Childhood, a nationwide initiative launched in May 2006 by the Department of Justice to combat the growing epidemic of child sexual exploitation and abuse. Led by the United States Attorney’s Offices and the Criminal Division’s Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, Project Safe Childhood marshals federal, state, and local resources to locate, apprehend, and prosecute individuals who sexually exploit children, and to identify and rescue victims. For more information about Project Safe Childhood, visit www.justice.gov/psc. Click the “Resources” tab on the left side of the page to learn about Internet safety education.

U.S. Attorney Hayes commended the FBI and PGPD for their work in the investigation. Hayes also thanked Assistant U.S. Attorney Megan S. McKoy and Trial Attorney Gwendelynn Bills, Justice Department’s Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, who are prosecuting the federal case.

For more information about the Maryland U.S. Attorney’s Office, its priorities, and resources available to help the community, please visit www.justice.gov/usao-md/project-safe-childhood and https://www.justice.gov/usao-md/community-outreach.

# # #

MIL Security OSI –

May 6, 2025

MIL-OSI Security: Mexican National Sentenced For Illegal Re-entry

Source: Office of United States Attorneys

NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA – ActingUnited States Attorney Michael M. Simpson announced that SANTIAGO PUENTE-GARCIA (“PUENTE-GARCIA”), age 26, a native of Mexico, was sentenced on April 30, 2025 after previously pleading guilty to illegal reentry of a removed alien, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1326(a).

United States District Judge Lance M. Africk sentenced PUENTE-GARCIAto an imprisonment term of time served , followed by one (1) year of supervised release, and a $100 mandatory special assessment fee.

According to court records, PUENTE-GARCIA was previously removed from the United States on February 4, 2022. He was later found in the Eastern District of Louisiana on October 29, 2024.

Acting U.S. Attorney Simpson praised the work of United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Enforcement and Removal Operations, in investigating this matter. Assistant United States Attorney Jon Maestri of the General Crimes Unit is in charge of the prosecution.

* * *

MIL Security OSI –

May 6, 2025

MIL-OSI: Five Star Bancorp Expands Food and Agribusiness Vertical

Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

RANCHO CORDOVA, Calif., May 05, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Five Star Bancorp (Nasdaq: FSBC) (“Five Star” or the “Company”), a holding company that operates through its wholly owned banking subsidiary, Five Star Bank, has expanded its food and agribusiness vertical to serve clients nationwide.

The vertical, now called Food, Agribusiness & Diversified Industries, will include increased support of clients in production agriculture, wholesale distribution and retail, manufacturing, food processing, and food distribution services. An initial team of three seasoned professionals will be led by Five Star Bank’s Senior Vice President and Group Managing Director, Cliff Cooper, who has over 35 years of banking expertise in food and agribusiness.

“Five Star Bank understands and appreciates the significance and value of those who bring food to our tables, from farmers, ranchers, and growers to food processors, manufacturers, packers, shippers and distributors,” said Cooper. “Five Star Bank knows the cyclical nature of food and agriculture and helps clients navigate commodities and economic cycles. For me, there is no greater purpose than ensuring those who feed our nation are provided with the most exceptional banking services available – services built on trust, partnership and shared values. They will have all of this and more at Five Star Bank.”

This enhanced vertical aligns with Five Star Bank’s organic growth strategy, which includes building geographies and business units through its high-tech and high-touch approach to business banking.

“There is no substitute for in-person conversations and connectivity – the hallmarks of doing business with Five Star Bank,” said James Beckwith, Five Star Bank President and CEO. “This differentiated customer experience requires tremendous client trust, which is critically important to the agricultural community. We are committed to clients in the Food, Agriculture & Diversified Industries sector. We are also committed to playing a key role in honoring the work and legacy of those who bring food to tables across our nation.”

To learn more about Five Star Bank, please visit https://www.fivestarbank.com.

About Five Star Bancorp
Five Star Bancorp is a bank holding company headquartered in Rancho Cordova, California. Five Star operates through its wholly owned banking subsidiary, Five Star Bank. The bank has eight branches in Northern California. For more information, visit https://www.fivestarbank.com.

Investor contact
Heather C. Luck, Chief Financial Officer
Five Star Bancorp
(916) 626-5008
hluck@fivestarbank.com

Media contact
Shelley R. Wetton, Chief Marketing Officer
Five Star Bancorp
(916) 284-7827
swetton@fivestarbank.com

The MIL Network –

May 6, 2025

MIL-OSI Security: California Man Pleads Guilty to Wire Fraud for $1 Million Fraud Scheme

Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) State Crime Alerts (c)

Seattle – A 43-year-old Laguna Niguel, California man pleaded guilty today in U.S. District Court in Seattle to wire fraud for his scheme to steal nearly $1 million from his employer, announced Acting U.S. Attorney Teal Luthy Miller. Paul Joseph Welch was the IT manager of Kent, Washington energy manufacturing company Algas-SDI when he used various schemes to steal more than $950,000 from the company. Welch is scheduled to be sentenced by U.S. District Judge Jamal N. Whitehead on August 21, 2025.

According to records in the case, Welch worked for the company from 2011 to 2024. He was promoted to Information Technology Manager in 2018. As early as 2017, Welch used the company’s Amazon business account to make unauthorized personal purchases from Amazon.com. Between 2017 and 2023, those purchases totaled at least $43,000. Welch primarily purchased electronics such at televisions, laptops and more—all for personal use. In 2019, Welch began using his company credit card for personal purchases through other online retailers such as Apple, Alaska Airlines, Instacart, and BestBuy. Between 2019 and 2024, those unauthorized personal purchases totaled at least an additional $60,000.

The scheme really accelerated in January 2021 when Welch began making payments to himself disguised as payments to a computer services company. Welch created a series of email addresses and payment processor accounts using a business name that was very similar to a legitimate computer services company based in Washington State. Welch then used Algas-SDI company credit cards to pay the computer services company under the guise that the company was providing IT equipment and services to Algas-SDI. However, the legitimate computer services company had no relationship with Welch and never provided any services or equipment to Algas-SDI. The credit card payments Welch made from Algas-SDI’s credit cards went directly to the payment processor accounts that Welch controlled. Between 2021 and 2024 Welch used this scheme to transfer approximately $879,175 from company accounts to his own accounts.

Algas-SDI tried to verify the legitimacy of Welch’s activity on multiple occasions, but each time, Welch provided false or misleading information to cover up his scheme. Algas-SDI employees asked Welch to submit invoices to substantiate his charges, but Welch emailed phony documents designed to look like invoices from the legitimate computer services company. At one point in 2023, an Algas-SDI accounting employee identified personal purchases on Welch’s company credit card. Welch claimed the charges were inadvertent and said he would repay the company. Welch never repaid the charges and continued to defraud the company through unauthorized personal purchases and more fake vendor charges. In January 2024, alone, Welch submitted phony invoices to Algas-SDI showing that the computer services company had purportedly invoiced Algas-SDI more than $55,000 for equipment and services in that timeframe.

On January 19, 2024, Algas-SDI employees confronted Welch about the charges from the computer services company accounts that Welch controlled. After Welch again told Algas-SDI that the vendor was a real vendor for the company, the company fired him.

The wire fraud charge is representative of the overall scheme. It represents the times Welch emailed the company false statements or invoices purported to be from a legitimate computer services company.

In all, between 2017 and January 2024 Welch secretly made at least 250 fraudulent charges for the third-party vendor he controlled. He made at least 140 unauthorized purchases with retailers using the company credit card and at least 100 fraudulent purchases on the company’s Amazon account. While Welch profited some $950,000 from his theft, the loss to ALGAS-SDI was approximately $982,520 due to various fees on the transactions.

Welch has agreed to make full restitution to the company.

Wire fraud is punishable by up to 20 years in prison and a $250,000 fine. Prosecutors have agreed to recommend no more than 27 months in prison. The actual sentence will be determined by Judge Whitehead after considering the sentencing guidelines and other statutory factors.

The case was investigated by the FBI. The case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Dane A. Westermeyer.

MIL Security OSI –

May 6, 2025

MIL-OSI: RUBIS: Q1 2025 trading update – Continued strong operating performance of Rubis’ diversified business model

Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

Paris, 5 May 2025, 5:45pm

Energy Distribution
- Retail & Marketing – Solid volume growth at +4%, gross margin at €218m (+4%)
  - Strong momentum of the retail business both in Africa and in the Caribbean region
  - Bitumen activity performing well in Togo and South Africa – Nigeria volume growth resumes
- Support & Services – Revenue up 2% at €266m
  - Lower bitumen trading margins as a result of higher in-house activity
Renewable Electricity Production
- Secured portfolio up 22% vs March 2024 at 1.1 GWp
No direct impact of trade tariffs on the business
2025 Guidance reaffirmed

SALES BREAKDOWN BY SEGMENT AND BY REGION

(in €m)	Q1 2025	Q1 2024	Q1 2025 vs Q1 2024
Energy Distribution	1,687	1,652	+2%
Retail & Marketing	1,420	1,392	+2%
Europe	215	209	+3%
Caribbean	584	590	-1%
Africa	621	593	+5%
Support & Services	266	260	+2%
Renewable Electricity Production	11	8	+28%
TOTAL	1,697	1,660	+2%

On 5 May 2025, Clarisse Gobin-Swiecznik, Managing Partner, commented on the Q1 2025 activity: “Our position as distributor of energy and mobility solutions, leader in a diversity of regions, has once again proved successful. Q1 demonstrates Rubis’ resilience and ability to deliver strong performance in a challenging global environment. Our Energy Distribution businesses achieved robust growth across all regions while Photosol delivered according to plan. Looking ahead, we remain confident in our 2025 guidance, supported by the strength and growth potential of our diverse businesses”

HIGHLIGHTS

No direct impact of trade tariffs on the business

None of Rubis’ businesses is directly concerned by the trade tariffs turmoil ongoing. The Group does not operate in the US, nor in China.

New geographical development: Acquisition of Soida in Angola

In March 2025, Rubis Énergie acquired 60% of the share capital of Soida (Sociedade Industrial de Derivados Asfálticos), adding to its existing share of 35% acquired at the end of 2022 and leading to a final stake in the Company of 95%. Soida distributes bitumen in Angola with a market share well over 50% and extending further bitumen geographical footprint.

Publication of first Sustainability Statement (CSRD) including strategy and updated climate ambitions for 2030

Rubis’ first Sustainability Statement (CSRD format) was published on 28 April covering among others: Climate change – Update on decarbonisation targets and financial implications. Beyond regulatory requirements, the Sustainability Statement provides a solid foundation for shaping the Group’s Think Tomorrow 2026–2030 Roadmap, which will integrate business-specific priorities and be co-constructed with the operating entities.

Q1 2025 COMMERCIAL PERFORMANCE

1. ENERGY DISTRIBUTION – RETAIL & MARKETING

In Q1 2025, volume continued to increase across the board. Margins also saw an upward trend, with some variability.

Volume sold and gross margin by product in Q1 2025

	Volume (in ‘000 m³)			Gross margin (in €m)
(in ‘000 m³)	Q1 2025	Q1 2024	Q1 2025 vs Q1 2024	Q1 2025	Q1 2024	Q1 2025 vs Q1 2024
LPG	346	343	1%	83	84	-0%
Fuel	1,071	1,048	2%	113	103	10%
Bitumen	135	100	35%	21	23	-6%
TOTAL	1,552	1,491	4%	218	209	4%

Volume sold and gross margin by region in Q1 2025

	Volume (in ‘000 m³)			Gross margin (in €m)
	Q1 2025	Q1 2024	Q1 2025 vs Q1 2024	Q1 2025	Q1 2024	Q1 2025 vs Q1 2024
Europe	255	245	4%	65	62	4%
Caribbean	584	573	2%	85	80	7%
Africa	712	674	6%	68	67	1%
TOTAL	1,552	1,491	4%	218	209	4%

LPG volume was slightly up. The main drivers for growth over the quarter were bulk in France, where sales teams were particularly dynamic and won several new contracts. Autogas in France also saw a strong performance, as a result of several contracts won with service stations in 2024. Market share in France continued to increase, benefiting from a high level of customer engagement. These strong dynamics were partially offset by lower volume in Morocco where the market faced a product shortage after difficult weather conditions kept the supply vessels from unloading the product. Gross margin remained stable.

As regards fuel:
- in the retail business (representing 49% of fuel volume and 52% of fuel gross margin in Q1 2025) volume grew by 4% vs Q1 2024. Gross margin increased by 14%, driven by:
  - increasing volume in East Africa, with Zambia, Uganda and Rwanda showing significant growth rates thanks to rebranded service stations,
  - Madagascar also saw significant volume and margin growth year over year, thanks to a well-maintained network and improved logistics, enabling the Company to increase its market share,
  - activity continued to be very dynamic in the Caribbean, with Jamaica, Barbados, and Guyana still performing well. The situation in Haiti remains unchanged with half of the service stations closed at the end of March 2025;
- the Commercial and Industrial business (C&I, representing 28% of fuel volume and 24% of fuel gross margin in Q1 2025) increased by 2% in volume and decreased by 1% in gross margin over the period, led by Kenya, Zambia, Guyana, Suriname and Barbados;
- the aviation segment (representing 20% of fuel volume and 19% of fuel gross margin in Q1 2025) saw increased margins in Q1 2025 at +6% despite a slight volume decline of 2%. This performance was mainly driven by the Eastern Caribbean region, where some airlines decreased their frequencies, and the pricing environment was favourable.
Bitumen volume was up 35% yoy, mainly driven by Nigeria where Rubis’ supply situation was particularly strong. Togo and South Africa also saw strong volume increase, with improving margins. Gross margin showed a 6% decrease yoy and is the result of a different product mix in Nigeria.

2. ENERGY DISTRIBUTION – SUPPORT & SERVICES

The Support & Services activity recorded €266m of revenue (+2% yoy) in Q1 2025.

Volume excluding crude deliveries was up 5% and margins were down 4% vs Q1 2024.

In the Caribbean, trading activity was dynamic with +5% in volume.

In Africa, bitumen shipping activity was at a level comparable to that of Q1 2024 (volume +1%) with more numerous but shorter routes.

SARA refinery and logistics operations present specific business models with stable earnings profile.

3. RENEWABLE ELECTRICITY PRODUCTION – PHOTOSOL

Operational data	Q1 2025	Q1 2024	Q1 2025 vs Q1 2024
Assets in operation (MWp)	535	450	+19%
Electricity production (GWh)	102	81	+26%
Sales (in €m)	11	8	+28%

Over Q1 2025, Photosol commissionned 12MWp, leading its assets in operation to grow by 19% yoy at 535 MWp. The secured portfolio increased by 22% to 1.1 GWp with 53 MWp new projects secured over Q1 2025. The pipeline reached 5.7 GWp (+21% yoy). Revenue for Q1 2025 stood at €11m, up 28% vs Q1 2024, benefitting from portfolio expansion and a higher load factor.

In April 2025, Alix Lajoie became President and Thomas Aubagnac became CEO of Photosol, as planned. Both were previously Deputy CEOs since 2023. The two founders, David Guinard and Robin Ucelli, remain shareholders and Board members of Photosol.

OUTLOOK – FY 2025 GUIDANCE REAFFIRMED

The working assumptions used to establish the 2025 guidance remain unchanged.

Group EBITDA is expected at €710m to €760m in 2025 (assuming IAS 29 – hyperinflation impact unchanged versus 2024).

Reminder: Photosol 2027 ambitions:

Secured portfolio⁽¹⁾ above 2.5 GWp
Consolidated EBITDA⁽²⁾: €50-55m, of which c.10% EBITDA contribution from farm-down initiatives
- Power EBITDA⁽³⁾: €80-85m
- Secured EBITDA⁽⁴⁾: €150-200m

NON-FINANCIAL RATING

MSCI: AA (reiterated in Dec-24)
Sustainalytics: 29.2 (from 30.7 previously)
ISS ESG: C (from C- previously)
CDP: B (reiterated in Feb-25)

Webcast for investors and analysts
Date: 5 May 2024, 6:00pm
Link to register: https://channel.royalcast.com/rubisen/#!/rubisen/20250505_1
Participants from Rubis:

Marc Jacquot, CFO
Clémence Mignot-Dupeyrot, Head of IR

Upcoming events
Shareholders’ Meeting: 12 June 2025
Q2 & H1 2025 results: 9 September 2025
Q3 & 9M 2025 trading update: 4 November 2025
Q4 & FY 2025 results: 12 March 2026

(1) Includes ready-to-build, under construction and in operation capacities.
(2) EBITDA reported in Rubis Group consolidated financial statements.
(3) Aggregated EBITDA from operating PV through electricity sales.
(4) Illustrative EBITDA coming from secured portfolio.

Press Contact

Analyst Contact

RUBIS – Communication department

RUBIS – Clémence Mignot-Dupeyrot, Head of IR

Tel: +33 (0)1 44 17 95 95

presse@rubis.fr

Tel: +33 (0)1 45 01 87 44

investors@rubis.fr

Attachment

RUBIS: Q1 2025 trading update – Continued strong operating performance of Rubis’ diversified business model

The MIL Network –

May 6, 2025

MIL-OSI USA: Wyden Presses State Department for Update on Use of Fallon Smart Policy, Urges Trump to Reset U.S.-Saudi Policy

US Senate News:

Source: United States Senator Ron Wyden (D-Ore)
May 05, 2025
Senator: “I will not be silent when Saudi Arabia tries to cleanse its blood-stained hands, nor will I cease to hold Saudi officials accountable for the death of Fallon Smart and others like hers.”
Washington, D.C. – U.S. Senator Ron Wyden today asked the Trump administration to provide an update on the State Department’s implementation of the Fallon Smart Policy, which requires the department to identify and revoke visas of any foreign official helping foreign criminal suspects evade prosecution by absconding from the United States.
The State Department policy secured by Wyden two years ago takes its name from a 15-year-old Portland girl struck and killed by a speeding car while riding her bicycle in 2016. The driver accused in her hit-and-run death on Portland’s Southeast Hawthorne Boulevard was a Saudi national who The Oregonian reported fled the country before trial – ultimate resurfacing in Saudi Arabia — with the likely assistance of the Saudi government.
“The Fallon Smart Policy sends a strong message that there is no place in our country for foreign officials helping criminal suspects evade the law,” Wyden wrote Secretary of State Marco Rubio in today’s letter. “As I promised the family of Fallon Smart, I will birddog the implementation of this policy and make sure the Fallon Smart Policy is applied whenever there is evidence of foreign officials undermining the American justice system. I will not be silent when Saudi Arabia tries to cleanse its blood-stained hands, nor will I cease to hold Saudi officials accountable for the death of Fallon Smart and others like hers. To that end, I ask you to provide me with details about the implementation of the policy.”
Wyden has long worked since 2018 to expose a pattern of Saudi nationals committing violent crimes in the United States and evading U.S. justice with help from the Saudi government.
“In most of these cases, local law enforcement confiscated the passports of the accused criminals and set bail at thresholds the individuals were unlikely to pay themselves,” Wyden wrote, noting passage of his bill in 2019 to declassify an FBI report on Saudi assistance of fugitives that concluded the Saudis wouldn’t stop until the United States addresses Saudi Arabia about its lawlessness. “Yet, many of these individuals somehow made bail and quickly received the resources and travel documents necessary to board a plane and leave our country, only to resurface in Saudi Arabia later.
Wyden also noted he traveled last month to Saudi Arabia to raise these issues directly with Saudi government officials, and urging those Saudi officials to return to the United States all Saudi nationals accused of crimes so they may stand trial.
“I ask that you pursue this issue with the highest levels of leadership within the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and formally press for the return of all Saudi nationals who evaded justice,” Wyden wrote. “Finally, I ask that you promptly declassify and make public any information about foreign officials engaging in the practice of helping foreign criminal suspects evade the U.S. justice system. As the declassification of the 2019 FBI report demonstrated, transparency is necessary if local judicial and law enforcement officials are to be notified of the threat and if the U.S. Government, in coordination with Congress, are to develop and implement policies to protect Americans and the rule of law.
In a second Wyden letter today, Wyden wrote President Trump to urge a full reset of the U.S.-Saudi Arabia relationship to protect the American people and safeguard U.S. interests.
In that letter, Wyden again cited the Fallon Smart Policy as well as the role of Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman Al Saud and Saudi government officials in the brutal slaying of Washington Post journalist Jamal Khashoggi along with the surveillance, detention, torture and killing of dissidents, journalists, women’s rights activists and foreign laborers.
“I understand that you are planning a visit to Saudi Arabia, and I urge you to seek accountability for Saudi abuses against our country, including its punitive economic actions that have undermined U.S. interests,” Wyden wrote Trump. “You must push for Saudi recognition of these actions. You must also seek retribution for these actions and refrain from handing out favors to the Saudis until they follow through with meaningful reform.”
The entire letter to Trump is here. The entire letter to Rubio is here.
Related Files

MIL OSI USA News –

May 6, 2025

MIL-OSI Security: District of Arizona Charges 287 Individuals for Immigration-Related Criminal Conduct in Arizona this Week

Source: United States Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Explosives (ATF)

PHOENIX, Ariz. – During this week of enforcement operations from April 26, 2025, through May 5, 2025, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Arizona brought immigration-related criminal charges against 287 defendants. Specifically, the United States filed 107 cases in which aliens illegally re-entered the United States, and the United States also charged 156 aliens for illegally entering the United States. In its ongoing effort to deter unlawful immigration, the United States filed 21 cases against 24 individuals responsible for smuggling illegal aliens into and within the District of Arizona.

These cases were referred or supported by federal law enforcement partners, including Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s Enforcement and Removal Operations (ICE ERO), ICE Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), U.S. Border Patrol, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the U.S. Marshals Service (USMS), and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF).

Recent matters of interest include:

United States v. Krystal Lopez: On April 29, 2025, BPAs ran a registration check on a vehicle which showed a positive history of alien smuggling. The vehicle pulled into a gas station. The driver exited the vehicle and entered the store. BPAs approached the vehicle and saw a person hiding in the back seat underneath a blanket. A search of the vehicle revealed two additional people in the trunk. All three people were determined to be citizens of Mexico illegally present in the United States. The driver, Krystal Lopez, had been arrested one month prior for alien smuggling and was released pending trial in that case. She was charged by complaint in this case and ordered detained pending trial. [Lopez CR-25-02060 and MJ-25-07625]

United States v. Gloria Lopez Corona: On April 29, 2025, Gloria Lopez Corona crossed into the United States through the San Luis Port of Entry attempting to smuggle a five-year-old child. Corona presented a birth certificate for a two-year-old, which was inconsistent with the child she was presenting for entry. After being referred to secondary, she admitted to smuggling the child. The child had been given melatonin gummies and was sleepy and disoriented. Agents were able to find the child’s mother, Reyna Cecilia Hernandez Reyes, a Mexican citizen. Reyes admitted to giving her child to an unknown female to be smuggled into the United States. Both women were charged. [Lopez Corona et al 25-01540MJ]

United States v. Carlos Murillo: On April 30, 2025, Carlos Murillo, a Naturalized United States Citizen, was encountered by Border Patrol after transporting Marcelino Garcia-Alejo, an illegal alien. Murillo had been recruited to smuggle aliens via Facebook. He admitted to previously smuggling aliens, and believed he would be paid $700.00 for smuggling Garcia-Alejo. [Murillo 25-01544MJ]

Criminal complaints and indictments are simply methods by which a person is charged with criminal activity and raises no inference of guilt. An individual is presumed innocent until evidence is presented to a jury that establishes guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

These cases are part of Operation Take Back America, a nationwide initiative that marshals the full resources of the Department of Justice to repel the invasion of illegal immigration, achieve the total elimination of cartels and transnational criminal organizations (TCOs), and protect our communities from the perpetrators of violent crime. Operation Take Back America streamlines efforts and resources from the Department’s Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Forces (OCDETFs) and Project Safe Neighborhood (PSN).

RELEASE NUMBER: 2025-071_May 2 Immigration Enforcement

# # #

For more information on the U.S. Attorney’s Office, District of Arizona, visit http://www.justice.gov/usao/az/
Follow the U.S. Attorney’s Office, District of Arizona, on X @USAO_AZ for the latest news.

MIL Security OSI –

May 6, 2025

MIL-OSI Security: Registered Sex Offender Charged With Sending Obscenity To A Massachusetts Minor

Source: Office of United States Attorneys

Jay Clayton, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, and James Crowley, the Acting Special Agent in Charge of the Boston Field Division of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”), announced today the arrest of DAVID FERNANDES III. FERNANDES is charged with sending obscenity to a minor and being a registered sex offender when he sent obscenity to a minor. FERNANDES was arrested Thursday, May 1, and presented Friday, May 2, before U.S. Magistrate Judge Judith C. McCarthy in White Plains federal court and detained.

U.S. Attorney Jay Clayton said: “Allegedly, David Fernandes III, a registered sex offender, was not deterred by his previous involvement with the criminal justice system. This case underlines the urgent need for law enforcement to continue its efforts to protect children. The women and men of the Southern District and the FBI will use every tool available to investigate and prosecute those who sexually exploit children.”

FBI Acting Special Agent in Charge James Crowley said: “Anyone willing to sexually exploit children deserves to feel the full force of the law. The FBI has arrested David Fernandes, a registered sex offender, for sending sexually explicit material to an 11-year-old child in Massachusetts. Each time we’re able to step in and protect a child from further sexual exploitation, it’s a good day.”

As alleged in the Complaint filed on April 29, 2025, in White Plains federal court and statements made in court^[1]:

On or about October 8, 2024, FERNANDES knowingly transmitted to an 11-year-old an obscene photo of an adult male hand holding a penis. At the time FERNANDES engaged in this felony offense involving a child, he was required to register as a sex offender.

On March 19, 2019, FERNANDES was convicted in New York state of Disseminating Indecent Material to a Minor, for which he received a sentence of five years’ probation. He completed this sentence on or about September 12, 2024.

On or about October 11, 2024, the mother of an 11-year-old child (“Victim-1”) reported to the Holden Police Department, in Holden, Massachusetts, that she had discovered sexually explicit images and communications on Victim-1’s phone with a phone number ending in 4245 (the “4245-Phone”). She also reported that her daughter had advised her that her daughter’s 12-year-old friend (“Victim-2”) had been in communication with the user of the 4245-Phone.

A forensic review of Victim-1’s phone revealed over 4000 messages exchanged between Victim-1’s phone and the 4245-Phone between October 4, 2024, and October 8, 2024. In the messages, the user of the 4245-Phone identified himself as a 26-year-old man and transmitted sexually explicit videos and photos of an adult man to Victim-1’s phone. At approximately 4:41 a.m. on October 4, 2024, the 4245-Phone transmitted a video to Victim-1’s phone revealing an adult holding an erect penis, masturbating and ejaculating. At approximately 3:58 a.m. on October 8, 2024, the 4245-Phone texted, “I wanna feel u,” “Like genuinely feel inside u” and “I wanna be all the way inside you.” At approximately 4:00 a.m. on October 8, 2024, the 4245-Phone transmitted a photo of a male hand holding an erect penis. Shortly thereafter, the 4245-Phone texted, “Imagine that inside u.”

Victim-1 advised law enforcement that she first communicated with the 4245-Phone on or about October 4, 2024. Victim-2 advised law enforcement that she began communicating with the user of the 4245-Phone, who identified himself to her as “David,” in approximately September 2024 and communicated with him on Snapchat, Roblox, and through video chats on Google Meet. Victim-2 advised that “David” requested sexually explicit pictures and videos of Victim-2 and that she transmitted them to him, mostly via Snapchat. Victim-2 provided “David” with Victim-1’s phone number so that she and David could message one another.

Anyone who may have encountered FERNANDES, who used the Snapchat user names “tazjazz,” “diamondboy24k,” “itsmagikyouknow,” and “retrovxrse, or whose child may have had any communications with FERNANDES, is asked to contact the FBI at 1-800-CALL-FBI (225-5324).

* * *

FERNANDES, 27, of Lagrangeville, New York, is charged with one count off transferring obscene material to a minor, which carries a maximum sentence of 10 years in prison, and one count of committing the offense while being required to register as a sex offender, which carries a mandatory consecutive sentence of 10 years in prison.

The statutory maximum sentences are prescribed by Congress and provided here for informational purposes only, as any sentencing of the defendant will be determined by the judge.

Mr. Clayton praised the efforts of the FBI, including the FBI New York Hudson Valley Safe Streets Task Force and FBI Boston; the Holden Police Department; the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Massachusetts; the Dutchess County Sheriff’s Office; and the Town of Poughkeepsie Police Department in connection with this investigation.

The prosecution is being handled by the Office’s White Plains Division. Assistant U.S. Attorney Marcia S. Cohen is in charge of the prosecution.

The charges contained in the Complaint are merely accusations, and the defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.

^[1] As the introductory phrase signifies, the entirety of the text of the Complaint and the description of the Complaint set forth herein constitute only allegations, and every fact described should be treated as an allegation.

MIL Security OSI –

May 6, 2025

MIL-OSI: Security Bancorp, Inc. Announces First Quarter Earnings

Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

MCMINNVILLE, Tenn., May 05, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Security Bancorp, Inc. (OTCBB “SCYT”) (“Company”) today announced consolidated results for the first quarter ended March 31, 2025. The Company is the holding company for Security Federal Savings Bank of McMinnville, Tennessee (“Bank”).

Net income for the three months ended March 31, 2025 was $1.0 million, or $2.73 basic earnings per share, compared to $984,000, or $2.63 basic earnings per share, for the quarter ended March 31, 2024.

For the three months ended March 31, 2025, net interest income increased $335,000, or 13.1%, to $2.9 million from $2.6 million for the same period in 2024. Total interest income increased $763,000, or 16.9%, to $5.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025 from $4.5 million for the same period in 2024. Total interest expense increased $428,000 to $2.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025 from $2.0 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2024. The increase in interest expense was primarily due to an increase in interest-bearing deposits. Net interest income, after provision for credit losses, for the three months ended March 31, 2025 increased $379,000 to $2.9 million, compared to $2.5 million for the same period in 2024.

The provision for credit losses was $7,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2025, a decrease of $44,000 compared to $51,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2024.

Non-interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2025 was $486,000 compared to $515,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2024, a decrease of $29,000, or 5.6%.

Non-interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2025 was $2.0 million, an increase of $323,000, or 19.1%, from $1.7 million for the same period in 2024. The increase was primarily due to an increase in professional fees related to the renegotiation of data processing contracts.

The Company’s consolidated total assets increased by $32.1 million, or 8.9%, to $391.8 million at March 31, 2025 from $359.7 million at December 31, 2024. The increase in consolidated assets was due to increases in interest-bearing deposits with banks, Federal funds sold and loans. These asset increases were funded by an increase in customer deposits. Loans receivable, net, increased $12.3 million, or 4.7%, to $276.3 million at March 31, 2025 from $264.1 million at December 31, 2024.

Non-performing assets decreased $111,000, or 79.9%, to $28,000 at March 31, 2025 from $139,000 at December 31, 2024. The decline was primarily attributable to a decrease in real estate owned. Based on our analysis of delinquent loans, non-performing loans and classified loans, we believe that the Company’s allowance for loan losses of $2.8 million at March 31, 2025 is adequate to absorb known and inherent risks in the loan portfolio at that date. The allowance for loan losses at March 31, 2025 represented 9,953.7% of non-performing assets compared to 2,001.69% at December 31, 2024.

Investments and mortgage-backed securities available-for-sale decreased $2.6 million, or 5.8%, to $42.4 million from $45.0 million at December 31, 2024. The decrease was due to the maturity of investments.

Deposits increased $30.1 million, or 9.4%, to $ 350.6 million at March 31, 2025 from $320.5 million at December 31, 2024. The increase in deposits was due to increases in commercial interest-bearing demand deposits as well as certificates of deposit.

Stockholders’ equity at March 31, 2025 was $37.1 million, or 9.5% of total assets, compared to $35.6 million, or 9.9% of total assets at December 31, 2024.

Safe-Harbor Statement

Certain matters in this News Release may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements may relate to, among others, expectations of the business environment in which the Company operates and projections of future performance. These forward-looking statements are based upon current management expectations, and may, therefore, involve risks and uncertainties. The Company’s actual results, performance, or achievements may differ materially from those suggested, expressed, or implied by forward-looking statements as a result of a wide range of factors including, but not limited to, the general business environment, interest rates, competitive conditions, regulatory changes ,financial market conditions and other uncertainties.

Contact:

Michael D. Griffith
President & Chief Executive Officer
(931) 473-4483

SECURITY BANCORP, INC. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS (unaudited) (dollars in thousands)
OPERATING DATA	Three months ended March 31,
	2025	2024
Interest income	$5,278	$4,515
Interest expense	2,392	1,964
Net interest income	2,886	2,551
Provision for credit losses	7	51
Net interest income after provision for credit losses	2,879	2,500
Non-interest income	486	515
Non-interest expense	2,014	1,691
Income before income tax expense	1,351	1,324
Income tax expense	325	340
Net income	$1,026	$984
Net Income per share (basic)	$2.73	$2.63

FINANCIAL CONDITION DATA	At March 31, 2025		At December 31, 2024
Total assets	$391,786		$359,725
Investments and mortgage-backed securities – available for sale	42,412		45,047
Loans receivable, net	276,348		264,055
Deposits	350,644		320,527
Federal Home Loan Bank Advances	-0-		-0-
Stockholders’ equity	37,096		35,609
Non-performing assets	28		139
Non-performing assets to total assets	0.007%		0.04%
Allowance for loan losses	2,787		2,782
Allowance for loan losses to total loans receivable	1.00%		1.04%
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing assets	9,953.6%		2,001.69%

The MIL Network –

May 6, 2025

MIL-OSI: Coface : Coface records a good start to the year with net income of €62.1m, for an RoATE of 12.7%

Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

Coface records a good start to the year with net income of €62.1m, for an RoATE of 12.7%

Paris, 5 May 2025 – 17.35

Turnover: €473m, up 2.0% at constant FX and perimeter
- Trade credit insurance revenue up 1.2%; client activity also increased by 1.2%
- Client retention back up at near-record (95.0%); pricing remained negative (-1.3%) in line with historical trends
- Business information growing again double-digit (+14.7% at constant FX, +18.4% at current FX). Debt collection up +14.8%; factoring was down slightly by -0.7%
Net loss ratio at 39.1%, up by 3.3 ppts; net combined ratio at 68.7%, up by 5.6 ppts and stable compared to Q4-24
- Gross loss ratio at 38.7%, up by 5.5 ppts with higher opening year reserving and reserve releases stable at a high level year on year
- Net cost ratio increased 2.2 ppts to 29.5%, reflecting continued investments partially offset by better product mix
Net income (group share) at €62.1m, down by -9.2% compared to Q1-24
Annualised RoATE¹at 12.7%

Unless otherwise indicated, change comparisons refer to the results as at 31 March 2024

Xavier Durand, Coface’s Chief Executive Officer, commented:
“With a net income of €62.1m and an RoATE of 12.7%, Coface posted another quarter of solid results in a highly volatile environment. Shifting US policy on international trade is creating a high level of uncertainty, although its potential consequences are not yet visible. In this complicated environment for corporates, Coface remains very close to its clients and is maintaining a highly preventative stance in its risk portfolio which is well diversified across regions and sectors.
In the medium term, depending on their actual implementation and level, the announced tariffs may have a negative impact on global trade volumes. We may also see prices increase in the United States and an adverse impact on certain industrial sectors and regions, likely leading to higher numbers of business failures.
Thanks to its leading infrastructure, the quality of its information and its teams of internationally recognised experts, Coface is well positioned to support its clients in managing their risks.
Against this backdrop, our strategy to invest in better understanding short-term risks and in the strengthening of our range of services (Business Information, Debt Collection) is more relevant than ever and resolutely pursued.”

Key figures at 31 March 2025

The Board of Directors of COFACE SA examined the summary consolidated financial statements for the first three months (non-audited) during its meeting on 5 May 2025. The Audit Committee at its meeting on 2 May 2025 also previously reviewed them.

Income statement items in €m	Q1-24	Q1-25	Variation	% ex. FX*
Insurance revenue	378.6	382.9	+1.1%	+1.2%
Other revenue	85.0	90.3	+6.2%	+5.5%
REVENUE	463.7	473.2	+2.1%	+2.0%
UNDERWRITING INCOME/LOSS AFTER REINSURANCE	100.3	85.4	(14.9)%	(15.4)%
Investment income, net of management expenses, excluding finance costs	17.9	10.4	(42.0)%	(44.2)%
Insurance Finance Expenses	(11.4)	(4.1)	(63.6)%	(61.6)%
CURRENT OPERATING INCOME	106.8	91.6	(14.2)%	(15.3)%
Other operating income / expenses	(0.1)	(0.4)	+438.8%	+439.8%
OPERATING INCOME	106.8	91.2	(14.5)%	(15.6)%
NET INCOME (GROUP SHARE)	68.4	62.1	(9.2)%	(10.5)%

Key ratios	Q1-24	Q1-25	Variation
Loss ratio net of reinsurance	35.8%	39.1%	3.4	ppts
Cost ratio net of reinsurance	27.3%	29.5%	2.2	ppts
COMBINED RATIO NET OF REINSURANCE	63.1%	68.7%	5.6	ppts

Balance sheet items in €m	2024	Q1-25	Variation
Total equity (group share)	2,193.6	2,234.0	+1.8%

* Also excludes scope impact

1. Turnover

Coface recorded consolidated turnover of €473.2m, up +2.0% at constant FX and perimeter compared to Q1-24. As reported (at current FX and perimeter), turnover rose +2.1%.

Revenues from insurance activities (including Bonding and Single Risk) increased by +1.2% at constant FX and perimeter. Client retention returned to a level close to its record high at 95.0% in a still competitive market. New business totalled €37m, stable compared with Q1-24. This was driven by an increase in demand and growth investments, particularly in the mid-market segment.

Growth in client activity was positive at 1.2%, marking a further improvement compared to the already positive previous quarter. However, this level reflects the economic environment that prevailed before the tariff announcements by the United States. The price effect remained negative at -1.3% in Q1-25, in line with last year and long-term trends.

Turnover from non-insurance activities was up +7.5% compared to Q1-24. However, not all business lines enjoyed the same momentum. Factoring turnover fell by -0.7%, with Germany and Poland recording identical performance. Business Information turnover continued to grow, rising +14.8% (and +18.4% on a reported basis). Fee and commission income (debt collection commissions) increased +14.8% due to the increase in claims to be collected. Commissions were up +4.0%, exceeding growth in premium income.

Total revenue – in €m (by country of invoicing)	Q1-24	Q1-25	Variation	% ex. FX²
Northern Europe	97.8	97.0	(0.8)%	(0.8)%
Western Europe	91.7	96.0	+4.7%	+1.9%
Central & Eastern Europe	45.1	42.3	(6.3)%	(6.9)%
Mediterranean & Africa	138.9	143.4	+3.2%	+5.1%
North America	42.6	43.5	+2.0%	+1.5%
Latin America	18.6	20.4	+9.7%	+16.0%
Asia-Pacific	28.9	30.7	+6.2%	+2.7%
Total Group	463.7	473.2	+2.1%	+2.0%

In Northern Europe, turnover was down by -0.8% at constant and current FX. The region continues to suffer from the weakness of the German economy. This slight decline was partially offset by growth in non-insurance activities. Factoring turnover was down -0.7% but services were up +17.8%.

In Western Europe, turnover increased +1.9% at constant FX (+4.7% at current FX). The loss of several significant contracts was more than offset by growth in service activities.

In Central and Eastern Europe, turnover fell -6.9% at constant FX (-6.3% at current FX) due to client activity, which continued to drag down credit insurance, and a significant contract that is now included in another region.

In the Mediterranean and Africa region, which is driven by Italy and Spain, turnover rose +5.1% at constant FX and +3.2% at current FX on the back of robust sales in credit insurance and services and a generally stronger economic environment.

In North America, turnover rose by +1.5% at constant FX and +2.0% on a reported basis. The region benefited from a slight improvement in client activity and higher retention.

In Latin America, turnover increased +16.0% at constant FX and +9.7% at current FX. The region is benefiting from continued high inflation, which is benefiting client activity.

In Asia-Pacific, turnover increased +2.7% at constant FX and +6.2% at current FX. The region is benefiting from high retention and a slight increase in client activity.

2. Result

Combined ratio

The combined ratio net of reinsurance stood at 68.7% for Q1-25, an increase of 5.6 ppts year on year but flat compared to the previous quarter.

(i) Loss ratio

The gross loss ratio stood at 38.7%, up 5.5 ppts compared to the previous year. This increase reflects the normalisation of the loss experience offset by high but stable reserve releases compared to the previous year. The number of mid-sized claims was below long-term trends but is increasing.

The Group’s provisioning policy remained unchanged. The amount of provisions related to the underwriting year, although discounted, remained in line with the historical average. Strict management of past claims enabled the Group to record 43.6 ppts of recoveries.

The net loss ratio increased to 39.1%, up 3.3 ppts compared to Q1-24, with reinsurance absorbing part of the deterioration in the gross loss ratio.

(ii) Cost ratio

Coface is pursuing a strict cost management policy while maintaining its investments, in line with the Power the Core strategic plan. In Q1-25, costs rose by +5.7% at constant FX and perimeter, and +5.9% at current FX.

The cost ratio net of reinsurance was 29.5% in Q1-25, up 2.2 ppts year on year. This increase was mainly due to cost inflation (+1.4 ppt) and continued investment (+2.9 ppts). In contrast, the improved product mix (Business Information, Debt Collection and fee and commission income) had a positive effect of 2.6 ppts. The change in reinsurance commissions explains most of the remainder.

Financial result

Net financial income was €10.4m in the first quarter. This amount includes an FX effect of -€12.4m, mostly due to the application of IAS 29 (Hyperinflation) mainly in Turkey for €4.5m.

The portfolio’s current yield (i.e. excluding capital gains, depreciation and FX) was €24.9m. The accounting yield³, excluding capital gains and fair value effect, was 0.7% in Q1-25. The yield on new investments was 3.8%.

Insurance Finance Expenses (IFE) stood at €4.1m for the first quarter. Outside of FX gains, the amount is very similar to that of previous quarters.

Operating income and net income

Operating income amounted to €91.2m in Q1-25, down 14.5%.

The effective tax rate was 23% for the quarter (vs. 27% in Q1-24).

In total, net income (group share) was €62.1m, down 9.2% compared to the first quarter of 2024.

3. Shareholders’ equity

At 31 March 2025, Group shareholders’ equity stood at €2,234.0m, up €40.4m or +1.8% (€2,193.6m at 31 December 2024).

This increase is mainly due to positive net income of €62.1m and an FX effect.

The annualised return on average tangible equity (RoATE) was 12.7% at 31 March 2025, down from the previous year, in line with the decline in net income.

4. Outlook

Uncertainty about international economic policy is reaching a rarely seen levels. The United States announced the implementation of massive tariffs which vary depending on industrial sector and the imports’ country of origin. Implementation has been delayed in most cases to allow time for negotiations.

Estimates of the long-term impact will have to wait until the tariffs actually implemented are more stable. In the short term, this uncertainty is delaying investment decisions and detracting from economic growth.

This unprecedented complex environment validates the strategy and positioning adopted by Coface, which draws on its internationally recognised experts and industry leading data to support its clients as effectively as possible as the situation evolves. In the short term, Coface has stepped up communication with its clients and maintained its prevention actions at a high level, while continuing to invest in line with the Power the Core strategic plan. The workforce dedicated to services (Business Information and Debt Collection) currently stands at nearly 700 people.

Conference call for financial analysts

Coface’s Q1-2025 results will be discussed with financial analysts during the conference call on Monday 5 May at 18:00 (Paris time). Dial one of the following numbers:

The presentation will be available (in English only) at the following address:
http://www.coface.com/Investors/financial-results-and-reports

Appendices

Quarterly results

Income statement items in €m Quarterly figures	Q1-24	Q2-24	Q3-24	Q4-24	Q1-25	%	% ex. FX*
Insurance revenue	378.6	375.6	375.9	382.7	382.9	+1.1%	+1.2%
Other revenue	85.0	83.4	78.0	85.5	90.3	+6.2%	+5.5%
REVENUE	463.7	459.1	453.8	468.3	473.2	+2.1%	+2.0%
UNDERWRITING INCOME (LOSS) AFTER REINSURANCE	100.3	94.7	88.8	84.9	85.4	(14.9)%	(15.4)%
Investment income, net of management expenses, excluding finance costs	17.9	22.8	19.0	31.9	10.4	(42.0)%	(44.2)%
Insurance Finance Expenses	(11.4)	(6.7)	(7.3)	(17.1)	(4.1)	(63.6)%	(61.6)%
CURRENT OPERATING INCOME	106.8	110.9	100.5	99.7	91.6	(14.2)%	(15.3)%
Other operating income / expenses	(0.1)	(0.5)	(2.6)	(5.5)	(0.4)	438.8%	439.8%
OPERATING INCOME	106.8	110.4	97.9	94.2	91.2	(14.5)%	(15.6)%
NET INCOME (GROUP SHARE)	68.4	73.8	65.4	53.4	62.1	(9.2)%	(10.5)%
Income tax rate	27.2%	26.8%	25.5%	36.2%	23.0%	(4.2) ppt

Cumulated results

Income statement items in €m Cumulated figures	Q1-24	H1-24	9M-24	2024	Q1-25	%	% ex. FX*
Insurance revenue	378.6	754.3	1,130.2	1,512.9	382.9	+1.1%	+1.2%
Other revenue	85.0	168.5	246.4	331.9	90.3	+6.2%	+5.5%
REVENUE	463.7	922.7	1,376.6	1,844.8	473.2	+2.1%	+2.0%
UNDERWRITING INCOME (LOSS) AFTER REINSURANCE	100.3	195.0	283.8	368.7	85.4	(14.9)%	(15.4)%
Investment income, net of management expenses, excluding finance costs	17.9	40.8	59.8	91.7	10.4	(42.0)%	(44.2)%
Insurance Finance Expenses	(11.4)	(18.1)	(25.4)	(42.5)	(4.1)	(63.6)%	(61.6)%
CURRENT OPERATING INCOME	106.8	217.7	318.2	417.9	91.6	(14.2)%	(15.3)%
Other operating income / expenses	(0.1)	(0.5)	(3.1)	(8.6)	(0.4)	438.8%	439.8%
OPERATING INCOME	106.8	217.2	315.1	409.2	91.2	(14.5)%	(15.6)%
NET INCOME (GROUP SHARE)	68.4	142.3	207.7	261.1	62.1	(9.2)%	(10.5)%
Income tax rate	27.2%	27.0%	26.5%	28.7%	23.0%	(4.2) ppt

* Also excludes scope impact

CONTACTS

ANALYSTS / INVESTORS
Thomas JACQUET: +33 1 49 02 12 58 – thomas.jacquet@coface.com
Rina ANDRIAMIADANTSOA: +33 1 49 02 15 85 – rina.andriamiadantsoa@coface.com

MEDIA RELATIONS
Saphia GAOUAOUI: +33 1 49 02 14 91 – saphia.gaouaoui@coface.com
Adrien BILLET: +33 1 49 02 23 63 – adrien.billet@coface.com

FINANCIAL CALENDAR 2025
(subject to change)

Annual General Shareholders’ Meeting: 14 May 2025
H1-2025 results: 31 July 2025 (after market close)
9M-2025 results: 3 November 2025 (after market close)

FINANCIAL INFORMATION
This press release, as well as COFACE SA’s integral regulatory information, can be found on the Group’s website: http://www.coface.com/Investors

For regulated information on Alternative Performance Measures (APM), please refer to our Interim Financial Report for H1-2024 and our 2024 Universal Registration Document (see part 3.7 “Key financial performance indicators”).

Regulated documents posted by COFACE SA have been secured and authenticated with the blockchain technology by Wiztrust.
You can check the authenticity on the website www.wiztrust.com.

COFACE: FOR TRADE
As a global leading player in trade credit risk management for more than 75 years, Coface helps companies grow and navigate in an uncertain and volatile environment.
Whatever their size, location or sector, Coface provides 100,000 clients across some 200 markets with a full range of solutions: Trade Credit Insurance, Business Information, Debt Collection, Single Risk insurance, Surety Bonds, Factoring.
Every day, Coface leverages its unique expertise and cutting-edge technology to make trade happen, in both domestic and export markets.
In 2024, Coface employed ~5,236 people and registered a turnover of €1.84 billion.

www.coface.com

COFACE SA is quoted in Compartment A of Euronext Paris
Code ISIN: FR0010667147 / Ticker: COFA

DISCLAIMER – Certain declarations featured in this press release may contain forecasts that notably relate to future events, trends, projects or targets. By nature, these forecasts include identified or unidentified risks and uncertainties, and may be affected by many factors likely to give rise to a significant discrepancy between the real results and those stated in these declarations. Please refer to chapter 5 “Main risk factors and their management within the Group” of the Coface Group’s 2024 Universal Registration Document filed with AMF on 5 April 2024 under the number D.25-0227 in order to obtain a description of certain major factors, risks and uncertainties likely to influence the Coface Group’s businesses. The Coface Group disclaims any intention or obligation to publish an update of these forecasts, or provide new information on future events or any other circumstance.

1 Return on average tangible equity
2 Also excludes scope impact
3 Book yield calculated on the average of the investment portfolio excluding non-consolidated subsidiaries.

Attachment

2025 05 05 PR results Q1-2025 COFACE

The MIL Network –

May 6, 2025

MIL-OSI Security: Former FBI Electronics Technician Sentenced to 20 Years on Child Exploitation Charges

Source: Office of United States Attorneys

NASHVILLE – A former FBI electronics technician was sentenced last week to 20 years in federal prison having previously been found guilty after a jury trial on one count of sexual exploitation of a minor, one count of coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in unlawful sexual activity, two counts of receipt of child pornography, and three counts of transferring obscene material on an individual under the age of sixteen, announced Acting United States Attorney Robert E. McGuire for the Middle District of Tennessee.

According to evidence presented at trial, between June 2020 and April 27, 2021, Justin Carroll, who was employed by the Federal Bureau of Investigation as an electronics technician, engaged in sexually explicit chats and exchanged sexually explicit images with three fourteen-year-old females over various social media platforms after connecting with the minors on chatting websites. Carroll’s conduct was discovered after one of the victims mailed a Valentine’s Day package to the FBI office. Sexually explicit images of the minor females were found in Carroll’s social media accounts and on his cell phone. Images of Carroll were found in one of the minor’s social media accounts and on another minor’s cell phone. Carroll continued communicating with the fourteen-year-old victim who mailed the package, even after receiving an e-mail from her mother inquiring why her daughter mailed him a package and advising him of her daughter’s age.

“When someone in law enforcement dishonors their responsibilities by committing criminal acts, we will seek the most serious penalties in order to restore the public’s trust,” said Acting United States Attorney Robert E. McGuire. “Justin Carroll dishonored the men and women of the FBI by his deplorable actions and now, thanks to the prosecution team and our law enforcement partners, he faces the consequences of those actions.”

“Today’s sentencing underscores that no matter who you are, you will be brought to justice if you are found guilty of such criminal behavior,” said Special Agent in Charge Joseph E. Carrico of the FBI Nashville Field Office. “The FBI will continue to work with our partners to protect children from exploitation and hold accountable those who exploit or endanger them.”

“HSI is committed to justice by working with our law enforcement partners to hold anyone accountable for misconduct, reaffirming our dedication to upholding the trust the American people place in us daily,” said Homeland Security Investigations Nashville Special Agent in Charge Rana Saoud. “We will pursue these investigations vigorously as it is paramount that we maintain the trust and integrity of those we swore an oath to protect.”

Following his term of incarceration, Carroll will be on supervised release for 10 years.

This case was investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Nashville Field Office and Providence Field Office, with assistance from Homeland Security Investigations. Assistant U.S. Attorneys Monica R. Morrison and Juliet Aldridge prosecuted the case.

# # # # #

MIL Security OSI –

May 6, 2025

MIL-OSI Video: Inside the FBI Podcast: Joint Terrorism Task Forces

Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) (video statements)

On this episode of the Inside the FBI Podcast, we’ll mark the 45th anniversary of FBI Joint Terrorism Task Forces by discussing what JTTFs are, how the model came to be, why it’s stood the test of time, and how law enforcement agencies across the country can benefit from joining their local JTTF. For a full transcript and additional resources, visit fbi.gov/news/podcasts. And you can visit fbi.gov/terrorism to learn more about the Bureau’s counterterrorism efforts.
—————————————————
Subscribe to Inside the FBI wherever you get your podcasts:
Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/4H2d3cg…
Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast…
Google Podcasts: https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0…
More ways to follow us: https://inside-the-fbi.transistor.fm/…

Follow us on social media:
X: https://twitter.com/fbi
Facebook: https://facebook.com/FBI
Instagram: https://instagram.com/fbi
YouTube: youtube.com/user/fbi

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1tKEpiXXwEI

MIL OSI Video –

May 6, 2025

MIL-OSI Video: Inside the FBI Podcast: Transnational Repression

Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) (video statements)

On this episode of the Inside the FBI Podcast, we’ll define transnational repression (also known as TNR), explain the different forms it can take and why the FBI investigates it, and teach you how you can report suspected incidents to the Bureau. For a full transcript and additional resources, visit fbi.gov/news/podcasts. You can also visit fbi.gov/tnr to learn more about transnational repression and access relevant resources. And you can report suspected transnational repression to the FBI by calling us at 1-800-CALL-FBI—that’s 1-800-225-5324—or by submitting an online tip at tips.fbi.gov.

—————————————————
Subscribe to Inside the FBI wherever you get your podcasts:
Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/4H2d3cg…
Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast…
Google Podcasts: https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0…
More ways to follow us: https://inside-the-fbi.transistor.fm/…

Follow us on social media:
X: https://twitter.com/fbi
Facebook: https://facebook.com/FBI
Instagram: https://instagram.com/fbi
YouTube: youtube.com/user/fbi

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SvQxczPaLPg

MIL OSI Video –

May 6, 2025

MIL-OSI Global: A pope of the Americas: What Francis meant to 2 continents

Source: The Conversation – USA – By Neomi De Anda, Associate Professor of Religious Studies, University of Dayton

A portrait of Pope Francis is projected onto a water fountain in Lima, Peru, on April 21, 2025. AP Photo/Martin Mejia

Most stories about Pope Francis mention that he made history as the first pontiff from Latin America. In fact, Francis was the first pope in centuries to be born outside Europe. But what impact did that actually have on the Catholic Church? The Conversation U.S. asked Neomi De Anda, a theologian at the University of Dayton, to explain the significance of having a pope from the Southern Hemisphere.

Where do you see the influence of Pope Francis’ Latin American background?

In reality, Francis is not only the first Latin American pope; he’s the first American pope. Francis is Argentine, the child and grandchild of Italian immigrants, and the first to be born in “América.” Though geography divides it into two continents, North and South, it is one land – one many Indigenous communities call “Turtle Island” or “Abya Yala.”

In the pope’s 2024 video message to the Academy of Catholic Hispanic Theologians of the United States, he called upon them “to be bridge-builders between the Americas” and to be a church that “welcomes, accompanies, and integrates” migrants. Speaking in Spanish, he invited the academy “to do theology with your head, your hearts, and your hands” and to integrate “the richness of both cultures, North and South, at the service of a dignified life.”

Pope Francis arrives for a massive open-air Mass in a park just a few yards from the U.S. border in Ciudad Juarez, Mexico, on Feb. 17, 2016.
AP Photo/Dario Lopez-Mills

This message emphasizes Francis’ view of “synodality” – meaning a church that walks together – and his understanding of the connection among all people in the Americas and the Caribbean. It also shows a recurring theme of his papacy: the connections between pastoral care and theology.

The greeting also highlights his desire for all to have a life of well-being, or “buen vivir,” through God’s love. As Jesus says in the Gospel of John, “I came so that they may have life and have it more abundantly.” This is also a key theme in a 2007 document produced after a meeting of Latin American bishops, known as Aparecida. Francis, then a cardinal, was a primary drafter.

Aparecida points out Latin America’s abundance of aquifers and forest lands, which are “humanity’s lungs.” It laments economic factors leading to environmental destruction and climate change – themes that would prove important to Francis’ papacy. The document stresses God’s care for people whose lands are being pillaged and who are forced to migrate. It claims “nothing and no one” can take away the strength, joy and peace God gives to the world’s most vulnerable.

Francis repeatedly acknowledged the Catholic Church’s role in crimes against Indigenous people, and he apologized. How did ideas about colonialism shape his papacy?

Francis spent much time and attention learning more about the experiences of Native communities: from his visit to Chiapas, Mexico, in 2016; to the Amazon Synod, a meeting of Catholic bishops from the Pan-Amazon Region, Indigenous leaders from this region, theologians and other subject matter experts in 2019; to his tour across Canada in 2022.

After the synod, Francis released a letter titled Querida Amazonia, which includes a call for Catholic leaders to learn more about the lives of Native peoples from across the nine countries of the Amazon.

During the papal Mass Francis celebrated in Chiapas, Mexico, in 2016, you can see the deep intermixing of local cultures and customs with the liturgy. For example, women spread incense across the altar using clay vessels, alongside deacons using a thurible, the metal burner typically used in services. Animal images at the front of the platform represented the integration of all of creation.

Pope Francis delivers his message during Mass in San Cristobal de las Casas, Chiapas, Mexico, on Feb. 15, 2016.
AP Photo/Gregorio Borgia

Throughout his trip to Canada in 2022 – whose purpose, in part, was to apologize for the Catholic Church’s role in the Indigenous boarding school system – Francis presented a disposition of listening and care. He spent more time meeting with people and hearing about their experiences than giving prepared speeches on the perspective of the church.

For First Nations peoples, the pope’s visit was an opportunity for reconciliation – but for some, it also reopened old wounds. One of their requests was that the church reject the Doctrine of Discovery: ideas about conversion to Christianity that colonial powers used to justify abuses.

Talking to reporters on the plane returning to Rome, Francis named what had been done to Indigenous children in boarding schools as “genocide.” The following year, the Vatican released a repudiation of the Doctrine of Discovery and documents associated with those ideas.

Are there other ways that the pope did – or didn’t – make the church feel more inclusive?

Francis’ papacy did less to change teachings on another topic shaped by colonialism: gender, sexuality and women. The Catholic Church maintains that there are two genders – male and female – which complement each other, a binary system that replaced more flexible ways of thinking about gender in some cultures.

Members of a delegation of Indigenous peoples in Quebec await a meeting with Pope Francis on July 29, 2022.
Ciro Fusco/Pool ANSA via AP

The question of whether to ordain women as deacons arose from the Amazon Synod and continued at the church’s global Synod on Synodality, but without resolution.

An emphasis on women’s role as child-bearers is embedded in the theological understanding of Mary as mother of Christ and the mother of the church. Whether intentionally or not, however, I would argue Francis laid groundwork for teaching about women and gender to expand.

Appointments of women to high Vatican positions point to small shifts in practice. The presence of trans people among the last people who paid respects to Francis at his funeral marks a sign of possibilities that hopefully will continue.

Although of “the church” might make us think of clergy, all who are baptized are the church. Around the world, Catholic communities have developed in many ways, with multiple forms of leadership – especially women lay leaders. The Vatican needs to continue to affirm that reality.

The Catholic Church understands diversity as a gift of the Holy Spirit. My hope is for someone to continue in Francis’ vein of appreciating that pluralism.

Neomi De Anda consults for the Louisville Institute, funded by Lily Endowment Inc. She receives funding from the Wabash Center for Teaching and Learning in Religion and Theology. She is a past president of the Academy of Catholic Hispanic Theologians of the United States and is affiliated with the Marianist Social Justice Collaborative.

– ref. A pope of the Americas: What Francis meant to 2 continents – https://theconversation.com/a-pope-of-the-americas-what-francis-meant-to-2-continents-255093

MIL OSI – Global Reports –

May 6, 2025

Category: Intelligence