NewzIntel.com

Category: KB

  • MIL-OSI USA: DHS Unearths TSA Corruption: Sitting US Senator’s Husband Received Blanket Exemption from National Security Review After Traveling with Known or Suspected Terrorist

    Source: US Federal Emergency Management Agency

    Headline: DHS Unearths TSA Corruption: Sitting US Senator’s Husband Received Blanket Exemption from National Security Review After Traveling with Known or Suspected Terrorist

    lass=”text-align-center”>New Hampshire Senator Jeanne Shaheen’s Husband Traveled with a Known or Suspected Terrorist Three Times in A Single Year 
    WASHINGTON —Today, the Department of Homeland Security revealed evidence detailing the politicization of TSA’s watchlisting program under the Biden administration

     Discovered documents, correspondence, and timelines clearly highlight the Biden’s inconsistent application of Silent Partners Quiet Skies and watchlisting programs, circumventing security policies to benefit politically aligned friends and family at the expense of the American people

     
    This includes William “Billy” Shaheen, spouse of fellow democrat and sitting U

    S

    New Hampshire Senator, Jeane Shaheen, while surveilling political opponents like Tulsi Gabbard months after

      
    After Senator Shaheen directly lobbied the former Administrator, Pekoske gave repeated, explicit direction to exclude Shaheen from the Silent Partner Quiet Skies list

    Pekoske granted Billy Shaheen a blanket Silent Partners Quiet Skies exemption despite Shaheen flying with a Known or Suspected Terrorist on three occasions

     
    All the while, Tulsi Gabbard, and many other Americans, were placed on the Silent Partners’ Quiet Skies list with little to no visibility, awareness, explanation, or oversight

      
    Billy Shaheen was hardly the only high-profile individual that was placed on this exclusion list

    This list also included members of foreign royal families, political elites, professional athletes, and journalists

     Shaheen’s blanket exemption has since been revoked

     
    “It is clear that this program was used as a political rolodex of the Biden Administration—weaponized against its political foes and to benefit their well-heeled friends,” said Secretary Kristi Noem

    “This program should have been about the equal application of security, instead it was corrupted to be about political targeting

    Trump Administration will restore the integrity, privacy, and equal application of the law for all Americans, including aviation screening

    ” 
    For far too long, this program has yielded little to no measurable security impact and lay at the expense of the American traveler

     
    A timeline of events:
    • 07/20/2023: William “Billy” Shaheen was a TSA Random Selectee on his flights from Boston Logan International Airport (BOS, Flight #1) to Washington-Reagan International Airport (DCA) and Washington Dulles International Airport (IAD) to BOS (Flight #2)

    Billy Shaheen was flagged for the first time as Co-Traveler with a Known or Suspected Terrorist (KST)

    • Shortly after Billy Shaheen’s travel, Senator Shaheen’s office made an inquiry to TSA about the Senator’s husband receiving enhanced screening on these two flights

    • 10/18/2023: Shaheen was flagged a second time as a Co-Traveler of a KST

    • It was after this flight that Senator Shaheen made a second inquiry to TSA, via a meeting with then Administrator Pekoske, about her husband being on a watchlist

    TSA did not disclose any information on watchlisting

    • 10/20/2023: Shaheen was then approved by then Assistant Administrator for Intelligence and Analysis Nykamp (she departed TSA in March 2025), acting on then TSA Administrator Pekoske’s Authority, to be added to the Secure Flight Exclusion List

    • This means that Shaheen was excluded from any future TSA Random Selectee designation, and Rules-based Selectee designation, such as Quiet Skies, Association Based Rule Selectee designation, or Silent Partner Selectee designation

    • 10/24/2023: TSA Legislative Affairs communicates with then Assistant Administrator for Intelligence and Analysis Nykamp, and refers to the action taken by Nykamp and/or Pekoske to add Shaheen to the Secure Flight Exclusion List

    • Follow on communication provide instructions to TSA Security Operations to ensure the exclusion is accurately captured in the passenger’s boarding pass status

    • Billy Shaheen stayed on the Secure Flight Exclusion List for 18 months until current TSA leadership removed him

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Disaster Recovery Center Opens in Calloway

    Source: US Federal Emergency Management Agency

    Headline: Disaster Recovery Center Opens in Calloway

    Disaster Recovery Center Opens in Calloway

    FRANKFORT, Ky

    –A Disaster Recovery Center has opened in Calloway County to offer in-person support to Kentucky uninsured and underinsured survivors who experienced loss as the result of the April severe storms, straight-line winds, flooding, landslides and mudslides

    The new Disaster Recovery Center in Calloway County is located at: Calloway County Courthouse Annex, 201 S

    4th St

    , Murray, KY 42071 Working hours are 9 a

    m

    to 7 p

    m

    Central Time, Monday through Saturday and 1 – 7 p

    m

    Central Time, Sunday

    Disaster Recovery Centers are one-stop shops where you can get information and advice on available assistance from state, federal and community organizations

     You can get help to apply for FEMA assistance, learn the status of your FEMA application, understand the letters you get from FEMA and get referrals to agencies that may offer other assistance

    The U

    S

    Small Business Administration representatives and resources from the Commonwealth are also available at the Disaster Recovery Centers to assist you

    FEMA is encouraging Kentuckians affected by the April storms to apply for federal disaster assistance as soon as possible

    The deadline to apply is June 25

    You can visit any Disaster Recovery Center to get in-person assistance

    No appointment is needed

    To find all other center locations, including those in other states, go to fema

    gov/drc or text “DRC” and a Zip Code to 43362

     You don’t have to visit a center to apply for FEMA assistance

    There are other ways to apply: online at DisasterAssistance

    gov, use the FEMA App for mobile devices or call 800-621-3362

    If you use a relay service, such as Video Relay Service (VRS), captioned telephone or other service, give FEMA the number for that service

    When you apply, you will need to provide:A current phone number where you can be contacted

    Your address at the time of the disaster and the address where you are now staying

    Your Social Security Number

    A general list of damage and losses

    Banking information if you choose direct deposit

    If insured, the policy number or the agent and/or the company name

    For more information about Kentucky flooding recovery, visit www

    fema

    gov/disaster/4860 and www

    fema

    gov/disaster/4864

    Follow the FEMA Region 4 X account at x

    com/femaregion4

     
    martyce

    allenjr
    Wed, 06/04/2025 – 17:44

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Galaxy Clusters on Course to Crash Again, NASA’s Chandra Finds

    Source: NASA

    New observations from NASA’s Chandra X-ray Observatory and other telescopes have captured a rare cosmic event: two galaxy clusters have collided and are now poised to head back for another swipe at each other.
    Galaxy clusters are some of the largest structures in the Universe. Held together by gravity, they are monster-sized collections of hundreds or thousands of individual galaxies, massive amounts of superheated gas, and invisible dark matter.
    The galaxy cluster PSZ2 G181.06+48.47 (PSZ2 G181 for short) is about 2.8 billion light-years from Earth. Previously, radio observations from the LOw Frequency ARray (LOFAR), an antenna network in the Netherlands, spotted parentheses-shaped structures on the outside of the system. In this new composite image, X-rays from Chandra (purple) and ESA’s XMM-Newton (blue) have been combined with LOFAR data (red) and an optical image from Pan-STARRs of the stars in the field of view.
    These structures are probably shock fronts — similar to those created by jets that have broken the sound barrier — likely caused by disruption of gas from the initial collision about a billion years ago. Since the collision they have continued traveling outwards and are currently separated by about 11 million light-years, the largest separation of these kinds of structures that astronomers have ever seen.

    Now, data from NASA’s Chandra and ESA’s XMM-Newton is providing evidence that PSZ2 G181 is poised for another collision. Having a first pass at ramming each other, the two clusters have slowed down and begun heading back toward a second crash.
    Astronomers made a detailed study of the X-ray observations of this collision site and found three shock fronts. These are aligned with the axis of the collision, and the researchers think they are early signs of the second, oncoming crash.
    The researchers are still trying to determine how much mass each of the colliding clusters contains. Regardless, the total mass of the system is less than others where galaxy clusters have collided. This makes PSZ2 G181 an unusual case of a lower-mass system involved in the rare event of colliding galaxy clusters.
    A paper describing these results appears in a recent issue of The Astrophysical Journal (ApJ) and is led by Andra Stroe from the Center for Astrophysics | Harvard & Smithsonian (CfA) and collaborators. It is part of a series of three papers in ApJ. The second paper is led by Kamlesh Rajpurohit, also of CfA, and the third paper is led by Eunmo Ahn, from Yonsei University in the Republic of Korea.
    NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Alabama, manages the Chandra program. The Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory’s Chandra X-ray Center controls science operations from Cambridge, Massachusetts, and flight operations from Burlington, Massachusetts.

    Learn more about the Chandra X-ray Observatory and its mission here:

    chandra

    https://chandra.si.edu
    Visual Description
    In this release, a composite image illustrates a dramatic cosmic story unfolding 2.8 billion light years from Earth. Presented both with and without labels, the image details the fallout when two galaxy clusters collide.
    At the center of the image are the colliding galaxy clusters, which together are known as PSZ2 G181. This combined cluster somewhat resembles an irregular violet peanut shell, with bulbous ends linked by a tapered middle. Inside each bulbous end are several glowing dots; some of the galaxies within the clusters. The violet peanut shape is tilted at a slight angle, surrounded by a blue haze of X-ray gas.
    Far from the bulbous ends, at our upper left and lower right, are two blotchy, thick red lines. These are probably shock fronts, similar to those created by jets that have broken the sound barrier. Bracketing the combined galaxy cluster, these shock fronts were caused by the initial collision about a billion years ago. They are currently separated by 11 million light-years.
    New data from the Chandra and XMM-Newton observatories suggests that PSZ2 G181 is poised for another powerful cosmic event. Having already taken one swipe at each other, the two clusters within are once again on a collision course.

    Megan WatzkeChandra X-ray CenterCambridge, Mass.617-496-7998mwatzke@cfa.harvard.edu
    Lane FigueroaMarshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, Alabama256-544-0034lane.e.figueroa@nasa.gov

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Ranking Member Huffman Statement on Supreme Court’s Refusal to Hear Apache Religious Freedom Case on Mining in Oak Flat

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Jared Huffman Representing the 2nd District of California

    May 28, 2025

    Washington, D.C. – Today, U.S. House Natural Resources Committee Ranking Member Jared Huffman (D-Calif.) released the following statement:

    “The Supreme Court’s refusal to hear the Apache Stronghold’s request to pause the Trump administration’s land transfer giving sacred Oak Flat to Resolution Copper is unjust, irresponsible, and a direct threat to the health, safety, and rights of the Tribe and surrounding communities.
     
    “The final environmental impact statement on Resolution Copper will confirm what tribal leaders and experts have warned all along: foreign mining giants, through their subsidiary Resolution Copper, will irrevocably destroy Oak Flat, where Native peoples have gone to pray, seek spiritual cleansing, and conduct ceremonies since time immemorial. Oak Flat—a federally recognized National Historic Site—will be nothing more than a two-mile-wide, thousand-foot-deep crater once Resolution Copper is done hollowing it out. This will spell the end of the Apaches’ religious practices forever, just so foreign mining corporations can make a quick buck. Because in America, your right to worship is sacred—unless what you worship sits on valuable real estate.
     
    “And for all the fearmongering about “national security,” let’s be clear: there’s no guarantee the copper will even stay in the United States. In fact, Resolution Copper seems more than willing to ship it straight to the Chinese Communist Party.
     
    “Rio Tinto’s scheme to mine Oak Flat is the latest chapter in a long, shameful history of extracting wealth from Native lands while destroying the communities who live there. The Supreme Court may have turned its back for now, but the fight to protect this sacred place—and the people who depend on it—is far from over.”

    Background

    In December 2014, a non-germane midnight rider was inserted into the must-pass National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) that mandated the public land transfer of the Oak Flat area to Resolution Copper. Oak Flat is located in the Tonto National Forest and listed on the National Register of Historic Places as a Traditional Cultural Property.
     
    On April 17, 2025, the Trump administration published their notice of intent to issue the final environmental impact statement (FEIS) for Resolution Copper in 60 days, i.e. on June 16, 2025. The 2014 NDAA language says the land transfer must happen within 60 days of the publication of the FEIS – but the transfer could happen immediately after the FEIS is published.
     
    Resolution Copper is just the latest example of a reckless foreign-backed mining project that disrespects tribal sovereignty and threatens our public lands with no guaranteed benefit to the American people. The mine is owned by multinational, multi-billion-dollar mining giants Rio Tinto and BHP. Rio Tinto’s largest shareholder is a Chinese state-owned company and the Rio Tinto has a long, disturbing history of human rights violations around the world. Resolution Copper has never guaranteed any of the copper mined from Oak Flat will stay in the United States and have no plans to build smelting or refining capacity for the copper they mine. Instead, they appear to be making plans to ship the unrefined copper to China.
     
    Three different legal challenges to the land transfer and Resolution Copper mine are currently working their way through the courts. The Supreme Court decided on May 27, 2025 not to hear a request from tribal organization Apache Stronghold to pause the land transfer while lower courts decide their case on the merits. Apache Stronghold alleges the land swap is an unconstitutional infringement on their religious freedoms under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act and the free exercise clause of the First Amendment. The San Carlos Apache Tribe and the Arizona Mining Reform Coalition with the Inter Tribal Association of Arizona have also asked the courts to pause the land transfer while their challenges to the land transfer are considered.

    ###

    Next Article Previous Article

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Ranking Member Huffman, Reps. Moylan, Case Reintroduce Bipartisan Magnuson-Stevens Update to Safeguard America’s Fisheries

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Jared Huffman Representing the 2nd District of California

    June 04, 2025

    Washington, D.C. – To kick off World Ocean Month, House Natural Resources Ranking Member Jared Huffman (D-Calif.), Rep. James Moylan (R-Guam), and Rep. Ed Case (D-Hawaii) have reintroduced the Sustaining America’s Fisheries for the Future Act. This bipartisan legislation would update and reauthorize the Magnuson-Stevens Act (MSA)—the cornerstone law guiding federal fisheries management and conservation that has helped make the U.S. a global leader in sustainable fisheries.

    Bill Text | One-Pager | Section-by-Section

    The reintroduction of this legislation reflects the culmination of a years-long, nationwide stakeholder engagement effort led by Ranking Member Huffman. From listening sessions across coastal communities to the release of a discussion draft for public comment, this inclusive process centered science, transparency, and real-world input from those most connected to America’s oceans and fisheries.

    “The ocean is the beating heart of our planet: it feeds us, regulates our climate, and supports coastal economies across the country,” said Ranking Member Huffman. “But our oceans and fisheries are under mounting pressure from climate change, habitat degradation, and shortsighted management. We need to ensure our laws reflect the urgency and complexity of this moment. While some are focused on rolling back environmental protections and ignoring climate science, we’re doing the hard work to safeguard our oceans. That means using the best available science, listening to those on the frontlines, and making sure our policies work on the ground for the people and ecosystems that depend on healthy, sustainable fisheries.”

    “I am proud to once again co-lead the Sustaining America’s Fisheries for the Future Act. As an island community, Guam recognizes the vital role that fisheries play in sustaining our people and culture. This bill is an extraordinary chance for Guam to ensure that issues facing our Pacific fisheries are heard loud and clear,” stated Delegate Moylan. “This bipartisan legislation will ensure that America’s fisheries are set up for success and the U.S. remains a global leader in fisheries management.”

    “Our world’s oceans and fisheries are under accelerating stress, and it is more critical than ever that any extractive practices focus on sustaining and conserving not only specific species but the entire marine ecosystem,” said Representative Ed Case (HI-01). “MSA has been and will continue to be our main authority for establishing and administering responsible approaches and is overdue for updating to assure it continues to work into the next generations. This is especially important in our Pacific given increasing competition for the ocean’s resources and the corresponding danger that absent sound national and international policies will do irreparable harm unless we do an update to the MSA.”

    The Sustaining America’s Fisheries for the Future Act includes key updates to better incorporate climate science, protect critical habitats, promote equitable access, and strengthen fisheries data collection and oversight. 
     
    In an effort to include as many opinions and viewpoints as possible, Ranking Member Huffman and Rep. Case held eight listening sessions across seven management regions during their nationwide fisheries listening tour. They heard from 80 different experts and stakeholders, in addition to public comments from dozens of members of the public, both in person and online.
     
    Many of the issues raised during the listening tour are reflected in the bill, including:

    • Addressing climate change and shifting fish stocks
    • Improving science, using new technologies, and modernizing fisheries data systems
    • Supporting fishing communities by creating a working waterfront program, increasing seafood marketing, and encouraging cooperation between industry and managers
    • Ensuring management doesn’t backslide on progress made in rebuilding fish stocks and reducing overfishing
    • Strengthening essential fish habitat consultation and removing loopholes in bycatch management
    • Increasing accountability, transparency, and stakeholder participation in fisheries management

    The bill also includes several bipartisan pieces of legislation and provisions that were part of previous Magnuson-Stevens Act legislation.
     
    This comprehensive and inclusive effort remains an iterative process. Rep. Huffman and the bill’s co-leads are committed to maintaining a transparent, deliberative, and science-based approach that continues to prioritize stakeholder input and respond to evolving needs.

    READ WHAT THEY ARE SAYING

    ###

    Previous Article

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Committee Leaders Raise Alarm Over Burgum’s Interior Staffing Freeze: “Illegal and Dangerous”

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Jared Huffman Representing the 2nd District of California

    May 30, 2025

    Washington, D.C. – Today, top Democrats on the House Natural Resources Committee sent a letter to Interior Secretary Doug Burgum demanding answers about a blanket freeze on personnel actions across the Department of the Interior, reportedly imposed earlier this month by the Department’s acting Chief Human Capital Officer—a former staffer of Elon Musk’s DOGE.

    “This sweeping directive has already sparked internal conflict at the Department, where staff are reportedly struggling to fulfill the duties of thousands of now-vacant positions essential to the Department’s day-to-day operations,” the lawmakers wrote. “Your actions to date raise serious doubts about your commitment to that obligation.”

    In the letter, the lawmakers cite the Administration’s proposed “skinny budget,” DOGE-led “voluntary” buyouts “backed by the threat of termination,” and pending Reductions in Force (RIF) plans as part of a “coordinated campaign of institutional dismantling” that “threatens the safety of our parks, the reliability of our water systems, and the scientific integrity of the very agencies entrusted with protecting Americans from wildfire, drought and other escalating risks.”

    The lawmakers also expressed concern over the reported removal of Bureau of Land Management Deputy Director Michael Nedd, “who reportedly raised concerns about the effects of the May 2 personnel directive on the Department’s ability to do its job.”

    The lawmakers called on the Department to provide a copy of the May 2 memo and respond to several questions, including what impact assessment was conducted, what essential functions are at risk, and whether other senior personnel have been penalized for raising objections.

    “Like other recent personnel actions, this latest personnel freeze is, at best, shortsighted and self-defeating—and at worst, illegal and dangerous for Americans who visit our National Parks, live near federal lands, rely on federal irrigation for their farms, or depend on sound science to protect their homes and communities,” the lawmakers wrote. “It represents yet another ill-considered action by the Trump Administration that leaves our country weaker, less safe, and less prepared to meet the challenges ahead.”

    The letter was signed by Ranking Member Jared Huffman (D-Calif.), Vice Ranking Member Sarah Elfreth (D-Md.), Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee Ranking Member Maxine Dexter (D-Ore.), Federal Lands Subcommittee Ranking Member Joe Neguse (D-Colo.), Energy and Mineral Resources Subcommittee Ranking Member Yassamin Ansari (D-Ariz.), Water, Wildlife and Fisheries Subcommittee Ranking Member Val Hoyle (D-Ore.), and Indian and Insular Affairs Subcommittee Ranking Member Teresa Leger Fernández (D-N.M.).

    Read the full letter.

    ###

    Next Article Previous Article

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Ranking Member Huffman Statement on Supreme Court NEPA Ruling That Lets Agencies Ignore Climate and Health Impacts

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Jared Huffman Representing the 2nd District of California

    May 30, 2025

    Washington, D.C. – Today, U.S. House Natural Resources Committee Ranking Member Jared Huffman (D-Calif.) released the following statement:
     
    “The Supreme Court once again put polluters first, siding with fossil fuel interests over the communities that bear the burden of more oil drilling and refining. In the face of the climate crisis, the government should be clear-eyed about the threats and act accordingly. But by giving agencies an excuse to ignore foreseeable impacts in their NEPA reviews, the Court has said they can look the other way about the consequences of their decisions if they want. And communities, and our country, will suffer.
     
    “The American people want to know when federal actions will cause environmental and health risks and fuel the climate crisis. Support for NEPA is high among voters of all stripes. They don’t want to let polluters sidestep responsibility. And they certainly don’t want House Republicans’ corrupt, polluter-friendly pay-to-play scheme for NEPA reviews, buried in their Big, Ugly Bill.
     
    “This ruling adds to the chaos and confusion already unleashed by the Trump administration’s sabotage of agencies’ NEPA procedures. This is part of a broader assault on our nation’s environmental protections. Congressional Democrats invested $1 billion to improve NEPA and environmental reviews through the Inflation Reduction Act—an investment that was already producing real results. Now, Republicans are dragging us backward, risking more delays, more litigation, and more harm.”

    ###

    Next Article Previous Article

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI Security: Albuquerque Man Sentenced to Federal Prison for Cyberstalking Multiple Women

    Source: US FBI

    Phillip Gonzales of Albuquerque has been sentenced to 33 months in federal prison after a pattern of persistent digital harassment targeting multiple women over a nine-month period.

    MIL Security OSI –

  • MIL-OSI: Canadian Large Cap Leaders Split Corp. Receives Approval for Normal Course Issuer Bid

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    [Not for distribution to United States newswire services or for dissemination in the United States]

    TORONTO, June 04, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Ninepoint Partners LP (“Ninepoint”), on behalf of Canadian Large Cap Leaders Split Corp. (the “Company”) (TSX: NPS/NPS.PR.A), announced today that the Toronto Stock Exchange (the “TSX”) has accepted its notice of intention to make a normal course issuer bid (the “NCIB”) to purchase its class A shares (“Class A Shares”) and preferred shares (“Preferred Shares”) through the facilities of the TSX and alternative trading systems in Canada. The NCIB will commence on June 9, 2025 and terminate on June 8, 2026.

    Pursuant to the NCIB, the Company proposes to purchase, from time to time, up to 176,492 Class A Shares and 176,492 Preferred Shares of the Company, representing 10% of the public float of 1,764,915 Class A Shares and 1,764,915 Preferred Shares. As of June 4th, 2025, there were 1,764,915 Class A Shares and 1,764,915 Preferred Shares issued and outstanding. The Company will not purchase, in any given 30-day period, in the aggregate, more than 35,298 Class A Shares or more than 35,298 Preferred Shares, being 2% of the issued and outstanding Class A Shares and Preferred Shares as of June 4th, 2025.

    Under Ninepoint Partners prior NCIB, which commenced on May 28, 2024 and ended on May 27, 2025, Ninepoint Partners obtained approval to purchase up to a total of 209,947 Common Shares, reflecting a security split that took effect on Feb 4, 2025, and 182,563 Preferred Shares, of which 49,450, on the post-split basis, Common Shares, and 43,000 Preferred Shares were purchased through the facilities of the TSX at a weighted-average price of approximately $10.39, on the post-split basis, per Common Share, and $10.45 for Preferred Shares.

    Ninepoint, the manager of the Company, believes that such purchases are in the best interests of the Company and are a desirable use of its funds. All purchases will be made through the facilities noted above and in accordance with the rules and policies of the TSX. All Class A Shares or Preferred Shares purchased by the Company pursuant to the NCIB will be cancelled.

    About Ninepoint Partners LP
    Based in Toronto, Ninepoint Partners LP is one of Canada’s leading alternative investment management firms overseeing approximately $7 billion in assets under management and institutional contracts. Committed to helping investors explore innovative investment solutions that have the potential to enhance returns and manage portfolio risk, Ninepoint offers a diverse set of alternative strategies spanning Equities, Fixed Income, Alternative Income, Real Assets, F/X and Digital Assets.

    For more information on Ninepoint, please visit www.ninepoint.com or for inquiries regarding the Offering, please contact us at (416) 943-6707 or (866) 299-9906 or invest@ninepoint.com.

    Certain statements included in this news release constitute forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to, those identified by the expressions “expects”, “intends”, “anticipates”, “will” and similar expressions to the extent that they relate to the Company. The forward-looking statements are not historical facts but reflect Ninepoint’s current expectations regarding future results or events. These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from current expectations. Although Ninepoint believes the assumptions inherent in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and, accordingly, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such statements due to the inherent uncertainty therein. Neither the Company nor Ninepoint undertake any obligation to update publicly or otherwise revise any forward-looking statement or information whether as a result of new information, future events or other such factors which affect this information, except as required by law.

    The MIL Network –

  • MIL-OSI Africa: Mining in Motion: Ghana Targets Global Artisanal and Small-Scale Gold Mining (ASGM) Integration

    Source: Africa Press Organisation – English (2) – Report:

    ACCRA, Ghana, June 4, 2025/APO Group/ —

    Ghana is formalizing its artisanal and small-scale gold mining (ASGM) sector to align with global standards, promote sustainability and boost economic integration. Despite ASGM contributing over 35% to the country’s total gold output, much of the country’s artisanal mining activity remains informal. Speakers during a Mining in Motion 2025 panel outlined steps to address this challenge and accelerate the global integration of Ghana’s ASGM sector 

    The session – titled Integrating ASGM into Global Supply Chains, sponsored by Emirates Gold- examined policy gaps, market barriers and innovative solutions to enhance the credibility and competitiveness of ASGM gold on the international stage. In recent months, Ghana has been making strides to foster a conducive environment for ASGM producers.  

    According to Neil Harby, Chief Technical Officer, London Bullion Market Association, “Recently introduced guidelines have improved Ghana’s capacity to produce small-scale gold, but the risk-reward ratio still lacks.”  

    As such, the Ghana Gold Board, established this year, has been created to oversee, regulate and manage all gold and precious mineral-related activities in Ghana. The Board aims to enhance regulation, maximize foreign exchange earnings, build gold reserves and promote value addition for national economic transformation.  

    “If you look at Ghana’s reserves, they’ve been very static. So, we’ve sat down and looked at how we can leverage gold resources in the country. If we can convert a domestic asset but go through the processes to convert it to a foreign asset, then we can begin to build upon our gold reserves,” stated Dr. Steve Opata, Head of Risk, Foreign Reserves Management at the Bank of Ghana. 

    Meanwhile, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) has supported Ghana’s efforts to formalize its artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM) sector by addressing illicit financial flows and promoting responsible sourcing through tools like the Due Diligence Guidance and ASM Hub. Collaborating with the Ghanian government, the OECD helps develop policies to regulate ASM, which plays a vital economic role but faces challenges including environmental harm and links to illicit activity. 

    “You have to be sure that you have some understanding of the mapping of the supply chain. You need the management systems to help you understand the circumstances of production around those mine sites. We want to allow commercial relationships between small-scale and artisanal miners and international producers,” stated Louis Maréchal, Sector Lead: Minerals and Extractives, OECD. 

    As a key player in the global precious minerals industry, Emirates Bullion Market offers significant expertise in gold refining and infrastructure development. In recent years, the UAE has become increasingly instrumental in Ghana’s gold sector. In 2024, the country emerged as one of the top export destinations for Ghana’s gold, accounting – alongside Switzerland – for 36.5% of total exports. 

    “Sustainability is conducive to operating with local miners. We want to know how their operations support the communities they come from. We only promote sustainable mining while safeguarding investor interest,” stated Sudheesh Nambiath, Manager, Dubai Multi Commodities Center, Emirates Bullion Market. 

    Meanwhile, Rand Refinery supports Ghana’s gold upstream sector by offering smelting, refining and metal recovery services. The company holds exclusive rights to refine Goldplat’s Ghana output, with a mutual agreement on processing by-products.   

    “Working as a team with in-country producers, ASM producers and large-scale miners, the intention is to unlock productivity at a commercial scale,” stated Jason McPherson, Head of Sourcing and Business Development, Rand Refinery. 

    With the launch of the Ghana Gold Board and strategic upgrades to its mining code, Ghana is aligning its ASGM sector with global standards. The country is positioning itself as a leading destination for sustainable gold sourcing, investment and innovation – proving that responsible mining can drive both local empowerment and global integration. 

    MIL OSI Africa –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Pro-radical Islam teaching in Pakistan – E-001984/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001984/2025/rev.1
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Emmanouil Fragkos (ECR)

    Teaching in Pakistani schools has been widely criticised for its ideological manipulation in favour of radical Islam. School textbooks contain one-dimensional narratives that emphasise Islamic identity over historical facts about the origin of Pakistanis from ancestors with different religions. In secondary school history books, Hindus are often presented as oppressive enemies of Muslims, while the actual multi-faith past of the region that is now Pakistan is obscured. In Islamic studies courses, jihad is overemphasised as a concept of ‘religious duty’. This approach fosters intolerance and limits critical thinking.

    Pakistani schools are a tool for the political and religious manipulation of the unwilling masses and their weaponisation in favour of Islamist goals, internationally. Educational reform in Pakistan is an essential prerequisite for international peace and security. Relevant recommendations from UNESCO and Human Rights Watch, concerning basic requirements for education in Pakistan, are not taken into account.

    In view of this:

    • 1.Does the Commission consider that the educational reality in Pakistan should be given serious consideration before Member States accept Pakistanis, with or without ‘labour’ agreements, ultimately endangering our citizens?
    • 2.Has the Commission monitored whether resolutions 2012/2843(RSP) and 2015/2515(RSP) have been taken into account in any way?
    • 3.If not, how could the Commission exert pressure on Pakistan to implement basic educational reform, so that at least it does not promote Islamic fundamentalism?

    Submitted: 16.5.2025

    Last updated: 4 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Aircraft noise around Schiphol – P-002158/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Priority question for written answer  P-002158/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Dirk Gotink (PPE)

    With a view to reducing aircraft noise around Schiphol, the Netherlands has followed the ‘balanced approach’ procedure. In view of this:

    • 1.Does the Commission agree that setting spatial, environmental and noise limits on the operation of national airports is a responsibility of the Member States, one which requires them to carefully balance economic and environmental interests?
    • 2.Does the Commission agree that the sole purpose of the mandatory European ‘balanced approach’ procedure when it comes to noise-related operating restrictions is to ensure that national assessments are carried out with the requisite due diligence, in particular to properly substantiate the inevitability or added value of a proposed operating restriction in the light of a noise-related target determined at national level?
    • 3.Does the Commission consider that the Dutch Government has carefully followed the ‘balanced approach’ procedure with regard to Schiphol Airport, and does it also take the view that the Dutch Government has therefore adopted a balanced package of measures to reduce noise levels for people and homes by 20 %?

    Submitted: 28.5.2025

    Last updated: 4 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Need for fair trials in Baku – E-002048/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002048/2025/rev.1
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Nicolas Bay (ECR)

    Since the ethnic cleansing of Nagorno-Karabakh, which saw more than 130 000 Armenians forced to flee their ancestral land, several citizens of Armenian origin have been arrested by the Azerbaijani authorities and are currently being tried in Baku. The Ambassador of Azerbaijan to Belgium stated that the trials were public and that diplomats and politicians could attend[1][2].

    With tensions high between Armenia and Azerbaijan over the peace treaty, the EU must remain vigilant as regards respect for fundamental rights, including the right to a fair trial.

    As it is engaged in strategic partnerships with these two Caucasus countries, including a controversial gas agreement with Baku, the EU has a responsibility to ensure its relations are founded on democratic principles. The European Parliament’s support for closer ties with Armenia sends a strong signal for a more balanced commitment[3].

    Is the Commission going to ask the EU Delegation in Azerbaijan to mandate an observer to attend the hearings of these trials on a daily basis to ensure that the international standards of justice and a fair procedure are being upheld?

    Submitted: 21.5.2025

    • [1] ‘The court proceedings are open, any person be it any citizen of any country, foreigner or foreign diplomat or journalist can attend this proceedings. You have your embassy in Baku, they are free to go and to provide directly to you all the information’, reply to Belgian politician Pierre Kompany, on 8 April 2025, at the hearing of Vagif Sadikov, Ambassador of Azerbaijan to the Committee on External Affairs of the Belgian Federal Parliament, on a resolution on Nagorno-Karabakh.
    • [2] ‘Political access to the political prisoners, well I already mentioned well you have excellent ambassador of Belgium in Baku Mr. Ambassador Julien De Fraipont, he is welcomed to attend the court proceedings anytime when he wants’, reply to Belgian politician Els Van Hoof in the same interview.
    • [3] https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-9-2024-0166_EN.html
    Last updated: 4 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: At a Glance – Review of the EU-Israel Association Agreement – 04-06-2025

    Source: European Parliament

    On 20 May 2025, the European Union (EU) High Representative/Vice-President of the Commission (HR/VP) announced the launch of a review of Article 2 of the EU-Israel Association Agreement. The review will assess Israel’s compliance with human rights and democratic principles, which is an essential element of the agreement. This is the first step in a procedure that could eventually lead to the suspension of the agreement.

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Revision of the Nitrates Directive – E-002119/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002119/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Sander Smit (PPE)

    With the Initiative Report for a European Water Resilience Strategy of 7 May 2025, the European Parliament made a clear call for a revision of the Nitrates Directive by the end of 2025. The European Parliament also made a clear call for the authorisation of and investment in RENURE, citing the Joint Research Centre’s report on the safe application of processed animal manure.[1]

    However, a leaked draft version of the Commission’s Water Resilience Strategy makes no mention of a revision of the Nitrates Directive.

    In a recent letter dated 19 May 2025, Environment Commissioner Roswall did state that the limited authorisation of RENURE is being negotiated within the Nitrates Committee on the basis of a 2024 proposal. That proposal was explicitly presented at the time as a temporary solution, pending the now-completed evaluation and subsequent revision.[2]

    • 1.Why does the draft version of the Water Resilience Strategy not reflect the European Parliament’s explicit call for a revision of the Nitrates Directive by the end of 2025?
    • 2.Does the Commission intend to present a proposal to revise Directive 91/676/EEC and to align it with the wishes of a democratic majority in the European Parliament?

    Submitted: 27.5.2025

    • [1] P10_TA(2025)0091, Par. 24-25
    • [2] Ref. Ares(2024)2885619
    Last updated: 4 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Impact of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive on the availability and affordability of essential medicines – E-002108/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002108/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Christine Anderson (ESN)

    The revised[1] Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive[2] (UWWTD) may significantly increase production costs for essential, low-cost medicines such as Metformin, a key treatment for type two diabetes used by nearly three million patients in Germany[3].

    Estimates suggest that pharmaceutical and cosmetic companies are required to cover at least 80 % of the costs (Article 9) of additional treatment to remove micropollutants in order to comply with the directive. This could lead to a cost increase of up to 445 % for Metformin production. Manufacturers warn that this would make the continued EU-based production of such medicines unviable, risking market withdrawals, medicine shortages and greater dependence on non-EU imports.

    • 1.Can the Commission confirm whether the estimate of up to a 445 % cost increase for Metformin is accurate, and whether it anticipates similar effects across other Member States and medicines, particularly for low-margin generics?
    • 2.How does the Commission reconcile the provisions of the UWWTD, specifically the mandatory cost allocation under Article 9(4), with the objectives of the proposed Critical Medicines Act, which aims to strengthen EU production and supply security for essential pharmaceuticals?
    • 3.Given the risk to medicine affordability and availability, does the Commission consider a targeted revision or exemption within the UWWTD necessary in order to safeguard public health and pharmaceutical resilience?

    Submitted: 26.5.2025

    • [1] COM(2022)0541.
    • [2] Directive (EU) 2024/3019 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2024 concerning urban wastewater treatment, OJ L, 2024/3019, 12.12.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2024/3019/oj.
    • [3] Der Spiegel, https://www.spiegel.de/wirtschaft/diabetes-medikament-metformin-droht-das-aus-hohe-kosten-durch-eu-abwasserrichtlinie-a-25ab387e-8ef2-43c7-a9e0-7714d850aeb3.
    Last updated: 4 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – EUBAM project on border surveillance between Tunisia and Libya – E-002103/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002103/2025
    to the Council
    Rule 144
    Özlem Demirel (The Left)

    The European Union Integrated Border Management Assistance Mission in Libya (EUBAM Libya) aims to significantly improve border surveillance between Tunisia and Libya by means of a comprehensive project. It focuses on the development of infrastructure, the provision of modern technical equipment and training in strategic locations such as the Ras Ajdir border crossing, the operations centre and an Abusharaf guard tower. The equipment deployed includes mobile X-ray detectors. At the same time, the project aims to strengthen cross-border cooperation between Libyan and Tunisian authorities. The mission also provides the Libyan customs administration with licences for an automated customs data system.

    • 1.In which locations – specifying the border crossing points, operations centres, guard towers – is EUBAM Libya active in the context of the above-mentioned project, and what technical equipment has been provided for this purpose?
    • 2.Between which specific Libyan and Tunisian authorities should cross-border cooperation be strengthened?
    • 3.For which automated customs data system does EUBAM Libya provide licences to the Libyan customs administration, who is the manufacturer thereof, and for what purpose are these licenses provided?

    Submitted: 26.5.2025

    Last updated: 4 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Independence and impartiality of the UNAR (Italian equality body) – E-002106/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002106/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Pina Picierno (S&D), Alessandro Zan (S&D), Marc Angel (S&D), Lucia Yar (Renew), Irene Tinagli (S&D), Krzysztof Śmiszek (S&D), Alessandra Moretti (S&D)

    The Ufficio Nazionale Antidiscriminazioni Razziali (UNAR) is a public equality body established by the Italian Government, responsible for promoting equal treatment and eliminating discrimination on the grounds of race, ethnicity, gender identity and sexual orientation.

    The UNAR falls under Directive 2000/43/EC[1] and, after its transposition into national law, Directive (EU) 2024/1500[2].

    Independence and impartiality should underpin its actions. Nevertheless, the UNAR reports to the Office of the Prime Minister and its director is appointed by the Prime Minister. Therefore, the principles of independence and impartiality are compromised and the office is subject to political influence by the government. The UNAR has been accused of delaying the financing of anti-discrimination projects and breaking off formal relations with civil society organisations and human rights defenders, specifically LGBTQIA+ related associations.

    In view of the implementation of Directive (EU) 2024/1500, in particular Articles 3 on independence and impartiality, 4 on resources, and 5 and 6 that set out the objectives, can the Commission clarify:

    • 1.if the UNAR and the Italian Government are already complying with the provisions applying to equality bodies in the context of the Directive (EU) 2024/1500;
    • 2.if it is already in contact with national authorities regarding the implementation of Directive (EU) 2024/1500;
    • 3.what would the possible actions be if Italy does not comply with the provisions of EU law?

    Submitted: 26.5.2025

    • [1] Council Directive 2000/43/EC of 29 June 2000 implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin, OJ L 180, 19.7.2000, p. 22., ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2000/43/oj.
    • [2] Directive (EU) 2024/1500 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 May 2024 on standards for equality bodies in the field of equal treatment and equal opportunities between women and men in matters of employment and occupation, OJ L, 2024/1500, 29.5.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2024/1500/oj.
    Last updated: 4 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Trade agreements: Morocco and Western Sahara – E-002098/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002098/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Kathleen Van Brempt (S&D)

    In October 2024, the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) ruled that the trade agreements between the EU and Morocco are invalid in the case of imports of goods from Western Sahara. This ruling has legal implications for the EU’s agricultural and fisheries agreements with Morocco and requires that products from Western Sahara carry an origin label without any reference to Morocco. In November 2024, the Commission stated during a hearing of Parliament’s Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development that a legal analysis of the ruling was being conducted, but to date, the current Commission has not yet proposed any solutions.

    Therefore, I ask the following follow-up questions:

    • 1.What plan has the Commission drawn up to adjust its trade policy with Morocco and Western Sahara in line with the October 2024 CJEU ruling, and what is the timeline for that plan?
    • 2.What are the implications of the CJEU ruling on the origin-labelling of goods imported from Western Sahara, in light of the declaration of invalidity of the trade agreement pertaining to goods from Western Sahara?

    Submitted: 26.5.2025

    Last updated: 4 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Lack of housing on the Greek islands and the impact on the provision of essential public services – need for EU support and coordinated action – E-002095/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002095/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Sakis Arnaoutoglou (S&D)

    During the tourist season, many Greek islands face a serious housing problem, as increased demand for tourist accommodation leads to a lack of available housing for long-term rental. This makes finding accommodation extremely difficult for public servants, such as doctors, teachers, teachers and seasonal firefighters, who are called upon to serve in these areas.

    In particular, on the islands of the Northern Sporades, firefighters have resigned as they were unable to find accommodation or reasonable rents.

    The housing problem affects critical sectors such as health and education, as workers find it difficult to find adequate and affordable housing. This situation undermines the ability of local authorities to provide essential services and respond to emergencies, especially in the current context of the climate crisis and increased tourist pressure.

    Can the Commission therefore answer the following:

    • 1.How does it intend to support, through existing funding tools, Member States with meeting critical housing needs for public servants in island and remote areas?
    • 2.Does it intend to reinforce the eligible actions under the regional programmes to include accommodation and temporary accommodation infrastructure for staff of key public services, such as healthcare, teachers and firefighters, in frontline areas?
    • 3.Will it consider setting up a European preparedness mechanism in island and tourist areas to systematically record housing shortages, allow a rapid response and substantiate the need for additional funding?

    Submitted: 26.5.2025

    Last updated: 4 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Strategic importance of the Central Communication Port for military mobility and EU security – E-002096/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002096/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Michał Dworczyk (ECR)

    With work on updating the Action Plan on Military Mobility and the preparation of a new Multiannual Financial Framework ongoing, I would like to draw the Commission’s attention to the strategic importance of the Central Communication Port – a multimodal project designed as an element of dual-use infrastructure, which is vital both for civilian transport and for the rapid deployment of allied forces in crisis situations. The Central Communication Port is of transnational importance and is able to play a key role in ensuring the EU’s security, especially in light of its location on NATO’s eastern flank and the geopolitical situation following Russia’s aggression against Ukraine. Although the project has been significantly scaled back, fortunately, thanks to public pressure, it has not been completely abandoned, and there is still a possibility of adapting it to its original objectives.

    In light of the above:

    • 1.Does the Commission deem the Central Communication Port project to be important for military mobility and EU security, and will the Commission classify the project as a strategic infrastructure element in the updated Action Plan on Military Mobility?
    • 2.Does the Commission consider the Central Communication Port project to be eligible for support under the Connecting Europe Facility, in particular in the area of dual-use transport infrastructure?
    • 3.Is the Commission considering recognising the Central Communication Port as a project of common interest (PCI) or granting it EU support, given its importance for the EU’s resilience and preparedness in terms of military transport, as well as its ability to respond to threats on the eastern flank?

    Submitted: 26.5.2025

    Last updated: 4 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Widespread phenomenon of fir and plane trees drying out in the mountainous areas of Greece – risk to biodiversity and forest ecosystems – E-002094/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002094/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Sakis Arnaoutoglou (S&D)

    In recent years, according to the Institute of Mediterranean Forest Ecosystems, a large number of fir and plane trees have been drying out in many mountainous areas of mainland Greece, with Tzoumerka, the Acheloos valley and Agrafa being typical examples. This phenomenon is a major concern for local communities and scientists, as it affects forest ecosystems, threatens biodiversity and increases the risk of fires and desertification.

    The fact that fir and plane trees are drying out appears to be related both to the effects of climate change (prolonged droughts, extreme temperatures) and to biotic factors, such as attacks by bark-eating insects and fungi. However, to date, neither a single monitoring mechanism nor a coordinated response has been implemented at European level.

    In the light of the above, can the Commission answer the following:

    • 1.Does it monitor the widespread phenomenon of fir and plane trees drying out in EU Member States, in particular in mountainous areas such as Tzoumerka, the Acheloos valley and Agrafa?
    • 2.Are there any European funding tools that can be used to research, prevent and tackle this phenomenon in these regions?
    • 3.Does it intend to strengthen cooperation with the Member States to set up early warning and intervention mechanisms to protect forest ecosystems from the consequences of the climate crisis?

    Submitted: 26.5.2025

    Last updated: 4 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – OPEKEPE (Greek Payment and Control Agency for Guidance and Guarantee Community Aid) scandal – P-002152/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Priority question for written answer  P-002152/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Emmanouil Fragkos (ECR)

    Widespread irregularities and fraudulent government practices have been noted since 2005 in the management of direct payments through OPEKEPE. The practices are now being formally investigated by the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO), under threat of loss of accreditation.

    Following the revelations, the Government decided to abolish the Agency and transfer the critical payment and audit functions to the Independent Authority for Public Revenue (IAPR). This choice raises serious questions regarding the management accreditation of the new body, the transparency of CAP payments and compliance with Regulation (EU) 2021/2116 on the financing, management and monitoring of the common agricultural policy, and in particular Articles 7 and 8 which set out the conditions for accreditation of paying agencies, the obligation of independence and sufficient operational and administrative capacity and the possible withdrawal of accreditation if the criteria are not met.

    Unfortunately, the withdrawal of accreditation will clearly mean the cessation of agricultural payments and the loss of European fund management for our farmers. At the same time, concerns about a cover up of political responsibilities and, ultimately, a lack of accountability are growing.

    In view of the above:

    • 1.Has the Commission assessed the legality of the transfer of OPEKEPE’s responsibilities to the IAPR?
    • 2.Has the Commission asked itself/established whether the conditions for management accreditation to disburse European aid are met by the IAPR?
    • 3.What measures does it intend to put in place from now on to ensure the independence, transparency and sound management of aid to Greek farmers?

    Submitted: 28.5.2025

    Last updated: 4 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Use of NextGenerationEU funds in the bullfighting lobby – E-002066/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002066/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Estrella Galán (The Left)

    The website[1] of an association of breeders of bulls for bullfighting mentions that it is receiving funding from NextGenerationEU without clarifying what it is for. This organisation is part of the so-called ‘bullfighting lobby’, whose activities involve lobbying and influencing public authorities in order to promote or strengthen bullfighting in Spain and also in the European Union[2].

    In the light of the above:

    • 1.What funds has the Commission allocated to this group?
    • 2.Is the Commission aware that EU funds are being used for bullfighting?

    Submitted: 22.5.2025

    • [1] https://ganaderosdebravo.es/en/
    • [2] https://ganaderosdebravo.es/en/defense-and-representation-in-european-institutions-central-and-regional-administrations/
    Last updated: 4 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Use of data, technology, and artificial intelligence tools for enhanced accountability

    Source: European Investment Bank

    EIB

    Samer Araabi (Accountability Counsel) presented different technologies to improve project/complaints management, including large language models, satellite mapping and AI tools.

    Wee Meng Chuan (SIMC Singapore) presented an AI-powered tool for mediation that can be applied to dispute resolutions, ensuring accurate and secure information management.

    Both presenters highlighted that AI should be considered as a complementary tool, and not as a solution.

    Ildiko Almasi Simsic (E&S Solutions) provided a brief presentation of her AI tools for environmental and social performance.

    Participants at the round tables explored strategies to extend AI’s benefits to developing regions, ensuring inclusivity rather than reinforcing biases. Cases of unequal power dynamics between stakeholders, including communities that are based on oral cultures or with limited digital access were discussed.

    Participants agreed that AI can enhance accountability by streamlining complex processes, improving data review and organization and enabling more efficient monitoring. Discussions however underscored ethical concerns about training data used for AI applications, and the need to keep human oversight in preventing misinformation and misuse. Trainings on the different AI solutions are needed to upskill each user of the tools.

    Andrea Repetto Vargas, Director of the Independent Consultation and Investigation Mechanism of the IDB Group, closed the session by summarizing the main highlights of the discussions and presentations.

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Rep. Dan Goldman Leads Effort to Streamline Permitting for Offshore Wind Projects

    Source: US Congressman Dan Goldman (NY-10)

    Appropriations Letter Urges Congress to Fund BOEM’s Office of Renewable Energy Programs, Prioritize Efficiency in Federal Permitting for Offshore Wind Projects 

     

    Offshore Wind Projects Projected to Create 56,000 Jobs by 2030 

     

    Read the Letter Here

    Washington, D.C – Congressman Dan Goldman led 18 of his Democratic colleagues in writing to House Appropriations Subcommittee on Interior, Environment and Related Agencies Chair Congressman Mike Simpson (ID-02) and Ranking Member Chellie Pingree (ME-01) requesting they robustly fund the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management’s (BOEM) Office of Renewable Energy Programs, as well as include language in the FY26 budget to find increased efficiencies in the permitting process for offshore wind projects, which are an economic and national security imperative. 

    “We request that you take action to ensure robust funding for the Department of Interior’s Bureau of Ocean Energy Management’s (BOEM) Office of Renewable Energy Programs that supports the timely review and permitting of offshore wind projects. We also ask that you include report language in the bill that supports finding increased efficiencies in the federal permitting process to allow for projects to come online as fast and proficiently as possible, without compromising the safety and integrity of the review process,” the Members began. 

    Permitting, constructing, and connecting offshore wind to the energy grid is imperative to ensuring the United States’ long-term energy needs are met. Domestic energy demands are projected to rise 50% by 2050 as a result of crypto and AI, and offshore wind will be an essential part of generating the energy necessary to meet the future. However, the benefits of offshore wind extend beyond energy capacity.  

    “By the end of 2024, the industry had already announced more than $9.5 billion in supply chain investments, including investing in the creation of nearly 40 new domestic vessels to serve offshore wind projects. These jobs are inextricably intertwined with project permitting timelines, and investing in BOEM’s permitting capacity will increase job security for thousands of Americans and investment confidence for developers,” the Members wrote. 

    Additionally, offshore wind provides a local, reliable, and infinite source of energy, independent of geopolitical rivals and fluctuations in global energy markets. Fully funding the BOEM’s Office of Renewable Energy Programs and streamlining project permitting will strengthen American manufacturing and make us a world leader in spearheading the green energy transition. Failing to prioritize offshore wind in the federal budget will allow China and other nations to fill the gap. 

    “Committing our support to technologies like offshore wind will also help diversify our grid, making it more safe, reliable, and resilient. It is imperative that we provide BOEM with the resources they need to facilitate the timely, efficient, reliable and accurate review of offshore wind project applications so we don’t slow down this momentum,” the Members wrote. 

    Read the full letter here or below: 

    Dear Chair Simpson and Ranking Member Pingree, 

    As you prepare the Fiscal Year 2026 (FY26) Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations bill, we request that you take action to ensure robust funding for the Department of Interior’s Bureau of Ocean Energy Management’s (BOEM) Office of Renewable Energy Programs that supports the timely review and permitting of offshore wind projects. We also ask that you include report language in the bill that supports finding increased efficiencies in the federal permitting process to allow for projects to come online as fast and proficiently as possible, without compromising the safety and integrity of the review process. As energy demand soars across the country, it is vitally important that we diversify our grid, support energy production in the United States, and build out an offshore wind project pipeline that can contribute to the “all-of-the-above approach to energy supply.  

    Current estimates project that domestic energy demand will grow by 2% annually and by more than 50% by 2050. Due in large part to the increased computing capacity needed to sustain rapidly expanding industries such as crypto and A.I., this unprecedented growth in demand requires a commensurate growth in supply. To meet these needs, to truly take an “all-of the-above” energy approach, and to ensure that we don’t fall behind our geopolitical adversaries in the race for energy dominance, we must ensure that offshore wind remains a part of our energy equation.  

    Over the past decade, the industry has advanced tremendously. By the end of 2024, BOEM had approved 19 GW of energy from offshore wind projects – enough to power 6 million homes — of which 10.8 GW were approved to begin construction. It is imperative that we continue this momentum, in collaboration with other energy sources, to meet the whopping 531 GW of expected grid demand in the coming decades. 

    The benefits of offshore wind extend beyond just energy capacity. They create massive economic investment and significant job opportunities across America, further diversify energy sources in the event of catastrophe, facilitate energy independence and energy dominance, and advance our geopolitical and national security interests. 

    According to a 2024 report published by American Clean Power, in large part due to the American energy credits in the Inflation Reduction Act, the offshore wind industry was projected to create 56,000 jobs across the country by 2030. These jobs span a number of industries and are largely good-paying, stable, manufacturing and marine trades jobs. By the end of 2024, the industry had already announced more than $9.5 billion in supply chain investments, including investing in the creation of nearly 40 new domestic vessels to serve offshore wind projects. These jobs are inextricably intertwined with project permitting timelines, and investing in BOEM’s permitting capacity will increase job security for thousands of Americans and investment confidence for developers. In turn, this will usher in additional spending in domestic offshore wind workforce development and supply chains. 

    Further still, ratepayers stand to gain significantly from the deployment of offshore wind as energy from such projects are projected to save households hundreds of dollars on their annual electricity bills. One study identified that 9 GW of offshore wind energy in New England would save New Englander’s between $2.79 to $4.61 a month on their electricity bill, adding up to about $630 annually. It would also provide nearly $362 million in annual public health savings as it would help prevent thousands of tons of dangerous pollution in our communities. 

    Finally, supporting offshore wind is a national security imperative. Offshore wind provides a local, steady, infinite source of energy that is not subject to the whims of our geopolitical rivals. It allows coastal areas, oftentimes with little space to build large new generation facilities, the ability to meet increased demand without depending on foreign sources of energy. And it provides a critical opportunity to build relationships in developing nations that expand far beyond energy production. Moreover, if we do not meet this demand, China will, which will increase their global footprint and influence. 

    Committing our support to technologies like offshore wind will also help diversify our grid, making it more safe, reliable, and resilient. It is imperative that we provide BOEM with the resources they need to facilitate the timely, efficient, reliable and accurate review of offshore wind project applications so we don’t slow down this momentum. While the industry is still relatively new, we have now seen a number of projects successfully permitted and we must learn from these examples and continue to improve and streamline the federal permitting process. As such, in addition to robust funding for BOEM Office of Renewable Energy Programs, we ask the committee include the following report language in their bill: 

    The Committee understands the value of streamlining the federal permitting process for offshore energy development, including wind power. As such, the committee directs the Bureau of Ocean Management, in consultation with the Department of Commerce, Department of Energy, the Environmental Protection Agency, the Army Corps of Engineers, the Department of Defense, and any other relevant agencies to identify efficiencies in the federal permitting process, including unnecessary duplicative efforts, to responsibly expedite reviews while maintaining comprehensive stakeholder engagement, tribal consultation, and environmental analysis so as to ensure that project development processes carefully consider impacts on marine life and ensure co existence with incumbent industries. 

    Thank you for your consideration. 

    ### 

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Investments in defence and Romania’s budget deficit – P-002191/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Priority question for written answer  P-002191/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Şerban Dimitrie Sturdza (ECR)

    The European Union has approved the creation of the SAFE instrument, the EUR 150 billion European arms fund that will support those Member States that wish to invest in defence industrial production through common procurement. This initiative is welcome in the current geopolitical context.

    However, since Romania has been in the excessive debt procedure (over 3 % of GDP) for four years and Romania had an ESA (standard used in the European Union) budget deficit of 9.2 % of GDP in 2024:

    • 1.How does the European Commission intend to harmonise the implementation of the SAFE programme with the situation of Member States with a major budget deficit, such as Romania, so that access to financing to strengthen defence capacities does not deepen national fiscal imbalances?
    • 2.In view of the high level of the budget deficit estimated for Romania (8.6 % of GDP in 2025), what concrete instruments is the European Commission making available to support Romania in its efforts to strengthen national defence, without compromising macroeconomic stability?
    • 3.What opportunities for financing or participation in European defence programmes are available to Romania in the context of other security initiatives, which do not entail new sovereign loans and can contribute to the development of defence industrial capacities?

    Submitted: 2.6.2025

    Last updated: 4 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – EU response to the Israeli Government’s announcement of 22 new illegal settlements in the occupied West Bank – P-002180/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Priority question for written answer  P-002180/2025
    to the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy
    Rule 144
    Hana Jalloul Muro (S&D)

    On 29 May 2025, Israeli authorities announced the establishment of 22 new settlements in the occupied West Bank, a move that directly contravenes international law, including UN Security Council Resolution 2334 (2016)[1]. This follows earlier statements by Prime Minister Netanyahu concerning plans to annex up to 30 % of the West Bank. These developments represent a serious escalation of de facto annexation, further eroding the viability of a two-state solution and fuelling instability in the region.

    Despite these repeated breaches, the EU has yet to adopt any effective response, raising serious questions about its credibility and its commitment to upholding international law. Failure to act not only undermines Palestinian rights but also weakens the EU’s stated commitment to a rules-based international order.

    In the light of these serious developments:

    • 1.What steps will the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (VP/HR) take to ensure a strong and united EU response to these illegal settlement expansions?
    • 2.Does the VP/HR intend to propose concrete measures, including potential restrictive actions, to deter further annexation or de facto annexation by Israel’s Government?
    • 3.How does the VP/HR view the credibility of the EU’s role as a mediator in the Middle East peace process, given the Israeli authorities’ continued disregard for international law?

    Submitted: 30.5.2025

    • [1] UN Security Council Resolution 2334 (2016) of 23 December 2016 on cessation of Israeli settlement activities in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem.
    Last updated: 4 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Kim, Correa Request Retroactive Funding Support in Wake of Airport Fire

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Young Kim (CA-39)

    Washington, DC – Today, Representatives Young Kim (CA-40) and Lou Correa (CA-46) sent a letter to Nancy Ward, Director of the Governor’s Office of Emergency Services (Cal EOS), demanding retroactive grant support for Orange County in the wake of last year’s Airport Fire. In the immediate wake of the fire, the County’s Fire Management Assistance Grant (FMAG) request submitted was denied—and has since had significant consequences for local residents and emergency response capabilities.

    Despite the fire’s aggressive behavior, widespread evacuations, and the threat to residential structures, the FMAG request was placed “on hold.” The rationale cited—insufficient threat level and lack of residential impact—was inconsistent with the on-the-ground conditions reported by first responders.

    “We are concerned that the denial of this FMAG request reflects a misjudgment of the situation’s urgency and impact,” Kim and Correa lambasted. “The Airport Fire posed a clear and present danger to life and property, and the County of Orange acted swiftly and in good faith to seek state support. It is important to note that Riverside County, which was also impacted by the Airport Fire, received their FMAG declaration on September 11 despite less structure loss than Orange County.”

    The Orange County Fire Authority and the Orange County Sheriff’s Department continued to engage with Cal OES through multiple revised submissions, then through additional follow up. These efforts were met with either no response or continued denial, despite mounting evidence of the fire’s severity and the financial burden placed on local agencies.

    “We respectfully request that Cal OES reconsider and approve the FMAG request retroactively,” they added, “acknowledging the critical need for federal assistance in mitigating the effects of this disaster and supporting our local emergency services.”

    You can read the full text of the letter HERE.

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Medical devices: potential effects of their inclusion in countermeasures to US customs duties – P-002201/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Priority question for written answer  P-002201/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Laurent Castillo (PPE)

    On 12 March 2025, the United States imposed customs duties of up to 20% on all goods from the European Union.

    In response, the Commission initiated a series of countermeasures. The process of adopting these countermeasures was originally scheduled to be completed in mid-April 2025[1] with the entry into force of the act imposing them.

    Given the United States’ decision to postpone the entry into force of its universal country-wide tariffs, the EU decided to suspend, for the same period, the planned countermeasures affecting US exports worth EUR 26 billion. Medical devices were not covered by these countermeasures.

    However on 8 May 2025[2], the Commission launched a public consultation on a list of US imports liable to be covered by countermeasures by the EU, this time including finished medical devices or apparatus for the manufacture of medical devices produced in the EU.

    Can the Commission therefore say:

    • 1.What was the reasoning behind this potential U-turn?
    • 2.If medical devices were to be included in the countermeasures to US customs duties, what would be the EU’s internal and/or external sources of supply for these products?
    • 3.Will these sources of supply be sufficient and enable the health of European citizens to be safeguarded?

    Submitted: 2.6.2025

    • [1] https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/qanda_25_750
    • [2] https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/fr/ip_25_1149.
    Last updated: 4 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –