NewzIntel.com

    • Checkout Page
    • Contact Us
    • Default Redirect Page
    • Frontpage
    • Home-2
    • Home-3
    • Lost Password
    • Member Login
    • Member LogOut
    • Member TOS Page
    • My Account
    • NewzIntel Alert Control-Panel
    • NewzIntel Latest Reports
    • Post Views Counter
    • Privacy Policy
    • Public Individual Page
    • Register
    • Subscription Plan
    • Thank You Page

Category: KB

  • MIL-OSI Global: If your child is watching TV and playing online games, you should do it with them – here’s why

    Source: The Conversation – UK – By Jamie Lingwood, Senior Lecturer in Psychology, Liverpool Hope University

    PeopleImages.com – Yuri A/Shutterstock

    Young children spend a lot of time using screens: watching television, playing on touchscreen apps, or facetiming with grandparents. In fact, research on global screen time guidelines has found that around 75% of children aged up to two years use some form of digital media daily, and 64% of children aged two to five years use it for more than an hour a day.

    Digital media is part of children’s lives and is set to stay that way. This means it is crucial to understand how to use this technology so children can benefit from it, and how to maximise its educational potential.

    A key way to do this is for parents and other adults to use digital media together with children. This is known as co-use, and can range from parents actively discussing the media content with their children to simply watching a show together.

    Our recent research with colleagues has investigated how adults using digital media with children aged up to six affects children’s ability to learn from digital media.

    We carried out a meta-analysis: a wide-ranging examination of existing research studies to identify trends and themes.

    We found that, overall, parent-child co-use is helpful for supporting young children’s learning from digital media. Adults using digital media together with children can help them understand and relate to the digital content better. Our research chimes with other studies which suggest that, for instance, parents using digital media with children can boost language skills.

    Our findings suggest that by being actively engaged, adults can help their children make the most of the educational benefits of digital media. This could involve one-to-one interactions directing their child’s attention to the educational content and relating it to real-world situations.

    Here are some practical tips for parents to maximise the benefits of co-using digital media with their children.

    Be an active participant

    Don’t just sit next to your child while they use digital media — engage with them. Ask questions about what they are watching or playing, and encourage them to think critically about the content. For example, if they are watching a video, you might ask “what do you think will happen next?” or “why do you think the character did that?”

    ‘Scaffold’ learning

    Scaffolding is a teaching technique in which parents can provide support to help their child understand new concepts, then let them use that concept by themselves. During co-use, you can scaffold by explaining difficult words, relating on-screen content to real-life experiences, or helping your child apply what they’ve learned from the media to other day-to-day situations.

    Choose high-quality content

    Not all digital media is created equal. Look for educational content designed to teach specific skills, whether it’s language, maths, or social-emotional learning.

    An educational app should have a clear learning goal, include problems for children to solve, and offer clear and specific feedback to support children’s learning. It should be presented with an entertaining narrative.

    Look for educational apps with learning goals.
    M_Agency/Shutterstock

    Apps and shows that encourage interaction and problem-solving are particularly valuable. Other research suggests that the quality of the content plays a crucial role in how much children learn from it.

    Encourage discussion and reflection

    After engaging with digital media, encourage your child to talk about what they watched or played. This helps reinforce the material and allows you to address any misunderstandings. Reflection helps children make connections between what they’ve learned and their own lives, deepening their understanding. For instance, if a show teaches about penguins, you could follow up by discussing if you might see penguins at the zoo, or which books your child has read that they appear in.

    Adapt your approach as your child grows

    As children get older, they may need less direct support during media use – but co-use remains valuable. Older children might benefit from discussions that challenge them to think critically about the media they consume. It could help them explore related activities, such as researching a topic they saw in a documentary or creating something inspired by what they watched.

    Balance screen time with other activities

    Digital media can help children learn. But it’s important to balance screen time with other activities that support development, such as reading, playing outside, and interacting with others face-to-face. Our study emphasises that for digital media to form part of a well-rounded day, families should try to co-use it with their children.

    Jamie Lingwood receives funding from Educational Endowment Foundation

    Gemma Taylor has previously received funding from the ESRC.

    – ref. If your child is watching TV and playing online games, you should do it with them – here’s why – https://theconversation.com/if-your-child-is-watching-tv-and-playing-online-games-you-should-do-it-with-them-heres-why-238615

    MIL OSI – Global Reports –

    January 24, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Global: Antifungal resistance is not getting nearly as much attention as antibiotic resistance – yet the risks to global health are just as serious

    Source: The Conversation – UK – By Norman van Rhijn, Research Fellow in Microbial Evolution, Manchester University

    TopMicrobialStock/Shutterstock

    Fungi are known for causing superficial infections of the nails, skin and hair, but they can also cause systemic infections that can have much more serious health implications. Indeed, over 6.5 million people are infected yearly with a life-threatening fungal infection, leading to 3.8 million deaths.

    Many of the fungi we know are an essential part of nitrogen and carbon recycling in the environment through their action of decomposing complex material. As they grow, they can undergo “sporulation”, where they release tiny spores that are dispersed on air currents. These spores are breathed in but are usually cleared by the lungs.

    However, this clearing is impaired in people with lung issues, such as cystic fibrosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, tuberculosis and lung cancer, putting them at a significant risk of developing a fungal lung infection.

    Many of the fungal pathogens are resistant to treatment with current drugs – of which only four classes are in use – or can rapidly acquire resistance during treatment or in their natural environment. As with bacteria and antibiotic resistance, so fungi can evolve to become resistant to the drugs used to treat them.

    In 2022, the World Health Organization (WHO) published the fungal pathogens priority list that catalogued fungi that pose a significant risk to human health. Of critical importance are Candida albicans and auris, Aspergillus fumigatus and Cryptococcus neoformans.

    The WHO list was designed to guide public health action and boost research and awareness in this field. Yet it has become clear that the desired effect of including fungal infections in the antimicrobial resistance policy debate is yet to be achieved. In a recent series of four articles in The Lancet about antimicrobial resistance (which includes resistance to bacteria, fungi, viruses and parasites), the problem of fungal disease contained just five sentences on the issue.

    The second UN-hosted meeting on antimicrobial resistance took place on September 26. Aside from the wider acknowledgement of antimicrobial resistance, the meeting drew attention to the growing problem of fungal pathogens and their resistance to known treatments, globally.

    Combating drug-resistant fungal infections is a complex problem. An important factor is that diagnoses of infections are often delayed – if they are even diagnosed at all. Simple tests for fungal infections are rarely available and only a few simple lateral flow tests are available.

    More sensitive tests require trained personnel and expensive equipment, which is usually not available in laboratories in poorer countries.

    Another issue is that antifungal drug development takes a long time and is very expensive. Fungal and human cells are more similar than bacterial and human cells, making finding antifungal targets with minimal toxicity to humans difficult.

    Because of this, only several antifungals that work differently to traditional antifungals are being developed. But even after they reach the market, the development of resistance in fungi is a threat to these treatments.

    Tons of fungicides are used annually to protect crops, of which some work the same way as antifungals used in humans. An example of this is an antifungal drug class called the azoles. There is strong evidence to suggest that azole resistance in the clinic can be of environmental origin due to agriculturally used azoles.

    This is a particular problem in Aspergillus fumigatus, where some hospitals and research centres have reported resistance to azoles in up to 20% of fungal samples.

    Over the last 25 years, a compound with a novel mechanism of action has been in development called olorofim. This compound is effective against many fungal pathogens. It is expected to be approved for use in humans soon.

    But recently a fungicide for agricultural use, ipflufenoquin, has been approved in the US, that works the same way as olorofim. This makes the risk of resistance to both compounds high as they both target Aspergillus fumigatus the same way – or, in the lingo, they have the same mechanism of action. Resistance to one compound will cause resistance to the other compound.

    This is not the only example of the dual-use of antifungals where compounds with the same way of working are used on farms and in hospitals and doctors’ clinics. This is a high risk for resistance development to antifungals we desperately need to treat human infections. The agricultural fungicide aminopyrifen has a similar target to the antifungal fosmanogepix, which can be used to treat humans.

    Environmentally acquired resistant fungi can cause infections in patients and therefore, from the first day of treatment, can’t be treated with the desired antifungal. As food security requires antifungal protection from plant pathogens, the question arises: how do we balance human health and crop health?

    The latest threat makes these issues more pressing

    The rise of fungal pathogens that we have only seen more recently, such as Candida auris, make these issues even more important.

    Candida auris is a yeast that was first found in 2009 and has spread globally since. It can cause life-threatening infections and has caused outbreaks in hospitals in several countries, including the UK. Unfortunately, it is resistant to many of the antifungals that are currently available.

    The UN-hosted AMR meeting was a good starting point, getting fungi and antimicrobial resistance acknowledged globally. However, it is unclear what specific action will be put into place to combat fungal resistance. But having this discussion is a first step to making progress on an issue that affects so many people daily.

    Norman van Rhijn receives funding from Wellcome Trust.

    – ref. Antifungal resistance is not getting nearly as much attention as antibiotic resistance – yet the risks to global health are just as serious – https://theconversation.com/antifungal-resistance-is-not-getting-nearly-as-much-attention-as-antibiotic-resistance-yet-the-risks-to-global-health-are-just-as-serious-239677

    MIL OSI – Global Reports –

    January 24, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Security: COPS OFFICE

    Source: United States Department of Justice (Hate Crime)

    The Collaborative Reform Initiative Technical Assistance Center (CRI-TAC) program provides critical and tailored technical assistance resources to state, local, territorial, and tribal law enforcement agencies on a wide variety of topics. It features a “by the field, for the field” approach while delivering individualized technical assistance using leading experts in a range of public safety, crime reduction, and community policing topics. CRI-TAC is a public service and offered at no-cost to your agency.

    •  
    • “The assistance was timely, forward thinking, progressive, and deeply appreciated.”                
      – Feedback received through the CRI-TAC Customer Satisfaction Survey

    Your browser does not support the video tag. 

    Request Technical Assistance

    To help us best serve you, please include the following information: 1) Name of your agency 2) Number of sworn officers 3) Size of population served 4) Topic and service requested 5) Contact information

    If you wish to contact the COPS Office Collaborative Reform Initiative team, please email TechnicalAssistance@usdoj.gov or call the COPS Office Response Center at 1-800-421-6770.

    “This is not similar to other federal programs that bog down [an agency] in paperwork and bureaucracy.                
    This is truly a “where the rubber meets the road” program that provides inputs and guidance/supports where it is locally needed and necessary.”                
    – Feedback received through the CRI-TAC Customer Satisfaction Survey

    Technical assistance encompasses a host of methods including training, peer-to-peer consultation, analysis, coaching, and strategic planning. Participating agencies identify areas of assistance to best suit their local needs, which may include the following:

    General Topics

    • Interview and Interrogation
    • Leadership
    • Management and Supervision
    • Mass Demonstration Response (see example case study)
    • Mass Violence Response
    • Mentoring
    • Procedural Justice
    • Recruitment, Hiring, and Retention (see example case study)
    • Report Writing
    • School and Campus Safety (see example case study)
    • Shared Service Models
    • Strategic Partnerships
    • Strategic Planning
    • Technology
    • Traffic Safety
    • Unhoused Populations
    • Unmanned Aerial Systems
    • Violent Crime Reduction and Prevention
    • Youth Engagement

    Smaller and Rural Agency Initiative

    CRI-TAC is launching a renewed focus on assisting smaller and rural law enforcement agencies. Smaller and rural agencies will continue to have access to the no-cost training and technical assistance that CRI-TAC is known for, but now CRI-TAC will provide training and technical assistance opportunities geared for the unique challenges confronting smaller and rural policing agencies. Through the Smaller and Rural Agency Initiative, agencies will be able to participate in training programs addressing areas such as active assailant response, multi-jurisdictional coordination, community partnerships, resource allocation, addressing hate crimes, report writing, duty to intervene, and crash re-construction.

    Mass Demonstrations Response: Virtual Training for Campus Agencies

    In response to the continued risk of mass demonstrations across the United States, CRI-TAC is partnering with the International Association of Campus Law Enforcement Administrators to deliver no-cost, virtual training related to planning for and responding to mass demonstrations on college campuses. Starting Tuesday, July 30, CRI-TAC will host one-hour, bi-weekly webinars for college campus agencies to hear expert recommendations. These webinars are open to all college campus police leaders and administrators. To register for upcoming webinars (8/27, 9/10, 9/20, 9/24) or view previous recordings, please visit https://www.iaclea.org/mass-demonstrations-response-virtual-training-for-campus-agencies.

    CRI-TAC staff will work with you to provide a customized solution. Types of services the CRI-TAC can provide include:

    • Resource Referral                
      Toolkits, reports, and other relevant publications
    • Web-based Training                
      Recorded webinars and live online training
    • In-person Training                
      Existing and customized on-site training
    • Virtual Mentoring                
      Personnel from the requesting agency will be connected with subject matter experts to share information and promising practices via phone or video conference call.
    • Meeting Facilitation                
      Subject matter experts will assist in facilitating meetings among agency members and other public and private sector stakeholders
    • Mass Demonstration Rapid Response Team (MDRRT)                
      Provides resources, tools, strategies, and information to problem-solve and maximize communications between the agency and community when faced with a mass demonstration

    “The subject matter experts were the best in the nation! Fantastic instructors, flexible and responsive.                
    They bring years of experience to the table and were fantastic resources.”                
    – Feedback received through the CRI-TAC Customer Satisfaction Survey

    Trainings

    CRI-TAC is pleased to offer the following CRI-TAC developed trainings upon request:

    • Take Action: Make the R.I.G.H.T. Choice and Intervene trains, encourages, and empowers law enforcement personnel to actively intervene when needed to prevent colleagues from committing policy or procedure mistakes or unprofessional, unethical, or criminal conduct. Intervening is critical for officer safety and wellness and community trust. This curriculum was developed for law enforcement officers of all ranks and experience, including basic entry-level recruits. This training can be delivered as an 8 hour direct or a 16 hour train the trainer.
    • Hate Crimes: Recognition and Reporting enhances law enforcement’s response and the uniform patrol officer’s ability to recognize and report a hate crime. This includes addressing victim needs, reporting incidents, and building community trust. This curriculum was developed primarily for uniformed law enforcement officers (e.g., police, sheriff deputies, troopers, agents, etc.) and first line supervisors. This training can be delivered as an 8 hour direct or a 16 hour train the trainer.
    • Hate Crime Investigations provides step-by-step methods for conducting a thorough hate/bias crime investigation to ensure accurate reporting and successful prosecution. The training provides specific strategies that effectively support victims and engage communities in the aftermath of a hate crime or hate incident. The curriculum was developed primarily for law enforcement personnel with investigatory responsibility (e.g., police, sheriff deputies, troopers, agents), investigators, and local prosecutors. This training is delivered as an 8 hour direct training.
    • Volunteer Engagement for American Indian and Alaska Native Missing Person Cases prepares and introduces the basic elements and practices for creating a volunteer engagement program to support law enforcement and communities in responding to emergent missing person cases. This training program includes two components: (1) Leadership Kick-Off Meeting is a 90-minute briefing that assists in preparing and gaining agency buy-in for the 8-hour volunteer engagement program training. This briefing is designed to be delivered virtually or in person. (2) Volunteer Engagement for American Indian and Alaska Native Missing Person Cases is an 8-hour training that introduces the practices and strategy for developing, implementing, and maintaining a volunteer engagement program. This training can be delivered in person or virtually.

    These trainings are provided at no cost to your agency through CRI-TAC. To request a training, please submit a request.

    Status # Sites
    Technical Assistance In Progress 62
    Technical Assistance Completed 854
    Total 916

    Who can request assistance?

    All requests must be received from the chief executive of a law enforcement agency or with expressed authorization from the chief executive of the law enforcement agency. Requesting agencies do not need to be a member of the IACP or any partnering organization to be considered for technical assistance services. Requesting agencies should be from a state, local, county, tribal, campus, or territorial law enforcement agency.

    Are other services provided beyond those already described?

    The CRI-TAC understands that each technical assistance request is unique and are open to exploring other services should specific needs arise. Please note this is not a grant program and certain costs cannot be supported through CRI-TAC project to include agency personnel and equipment needs.

    What happens after I submit a request?

    • Upon receipt, CRI-TAC staff will contact you to schedule a screening call, discuss the process, and obtain additional pertinent information.
    • From there, an intake call is scheduled with CRI-TAC staff and partners. This call gives you the opportunity to discuss your technical assistance needs in detail including your vision for the goals and outcomes of the technical assistance.
    • Post intake, we will develop a formal technical assistance request for review and approval.
    • Once your request is approved, we will develop a technical assistance work plan. This work plan includes a detailed description of the technical assistance, SMEs, and staff assigned to your project. The work plan is subject to your review, input, and approval before we move forward to begin delivering technical assistance.
    • Upon your approval of the work plan, we will initiate the technical assistance delivery. Throughout delivery, we will continue to ensure we are meeting your needs with regular communication.

    “The staff is outstanding and goes above and beyond for the local and county agencies they serve. They truly understand their market and their “customers” and have made this experience quite enjoyable!”                
    – Feedback received through the CRI-TAC Customer Satisfaction Survey

    For any press inquiries, please contact the COPS Office Communications Division at (202) 514-9079 or cops.office.public.affairs@usdoj.gov

    MIL Security OSI –

    January 24, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Global: How your online world could change if big tech companies like Google are forced to break up

    Source: The Conversation – UK – By Renaud Foucart, Senior Lecturer in Economics, Lancaster University Management School, Lancaster University

    vectorfusionart/Shutterstock

    The US Department of Justice may be on the verge of seeking a break-up of Google in a bid to make it less dominant. If the government goes ahead and is successful in the courts, it could mean the company being split into separate entities – a search engine, an advertising company, a video website, a mapping app – which would not be allowed to share data with each other.

    While this is still a distant prospect, it is being considered in the wake of a series of rulings in the US and the EU which suggest that regulators are becoming increasingly frustrated by the power of big tech. That power tends to be highly concentrated, whether it’s Google’s monopoly as a search engine, Meta’s data gathering from Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp, or by small businesses becoming dependent on Amazon.

    But what would a breakup of these tech giants achieve for consumers? Those in favour of shaking up Silicon Valley in this way argue that it would lead to more competition and more choice. And the best-case future scenario might look something like this:

    The year is 2030, and you are on your way to meet a friend for a meal. You receive a message notification on WhatsApp, which was sent by your friend using her Signal messaging app. Sending and receiving messages from different apps is now so common you barely notice it.

    In fact, “interoperability” – where different systems and tech work seamlessly together – is everywhere. In the same way you could send an email from Gmail to Hotmail back in 2024, you can now choose from a range of social media apps – alongside Instagram, TikTok and Snapchat – with text, pictures and video posted on one network easily accessible via another.

    You choose an app because you like the way it looks or the way it filters and presents content – not just because everyone else is on it.

    Similarly, your choice of restaurant and information on directions came from apps you have chosen from a much wider selection than the one you had access to back in 2024. You look at reviews produced by people you follow, irrespective of the platform they used to share it.

    Product placement and AI-generated content have practically disappeared, as the mapping app does not want to risk giving you advice you don’t want. If it did, you would simply switch to a competitor which provides a superior service.

    This increased level of competition is central to those who argue for breaking up big tech. Instead of app developers having to pay 30% of their sales to Google or Apple, there would be numerous app stores available, all competing to offer the best apps by cutting their profit margins. The theory is that the app market – and technological innovation – would thrive as a result.

    Research also suggests that the existence of competing apps makes consumers less lazy, and forces businesses to deliver better products, and better value for money.

    Private browsing

    In 2024, you would have had to trust the results provided to you by Google search, Google Maps, or a Google advert. And because Google owned your data, it could auction information about you to other businesses trying to reach you, without your say.

    You might have found Google’s services useful, but most of the benefit from personalised data would have gone to Google. And another big change that could come from breaking up big tech is that you might finally become the unique owner of that data.

    Potentially, you would be the only one with full access to your browsing history – the products you searched for, the ones you bought and the ones you almost bought. You would own the information about where you went for lunch, what you ordered, and how much you spent.

    Other information that would be owned by you might include how you commute to work, which video clips make you laugh, and which books you finished and the ones you abandoned immediately. The same goes for how you met your partner online, your dating history, and the health data your watch has collected about how hard you work at the gym.

    Your workout, your data.
    PeopleImages.com – Yuri A/Shutterstock

    In the imagined year of 2030, you would keep this data on an encrypted server, and different companies would offer apps to help you organise and manage your information. Whenever you wanted to, you could decide to use your data for your own purposes.

    Breaking up is hard to do

    Splitting up big tech companies is not without risks however. An obvious consequence is that those big companies would be less profitable.

    Right now, Google and Meta make (a lot of) money from advertising, and this is only possible because they own so much information about us. If they didn’t, they might end up charging users for the services they provide.

    Interoperability and greater competition may also provide more room for scam app operators. And while more choice about apps may be fine for some, it may be problematic for those who find modern technology challenging enough already.

    For regulators though, the challenge of modern technology seems to be a sense of powerlessness. And if they do decide to take the radical option and break up dominant companies, it could make a big difference to the online world for all of us.

    Renaud Foucart does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    – ref. How your online world could change if big tech companies like Google are forced to break up – https://theconversation.com/how-your-online-world-could-change-if-big-tech-companies-like-google-are-forced-to-break-up-240960

    MIL OSI – Global Reports –

    January 24, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Global: Liam Payne: journalistic ethics are often ignored when celebrities die

    Source: The Conversation – UK – By Polly Rippon, University Teacher in Journalism, University of Sheffield

    When someone famous dies, particularly if they are young or it was unexpected, it is natural for their fans to want to know what happened. But, as the reporting on the tragic death of singer Liam Payne shows, the media does not always handle this appropriately or ethically.

    The singer, 31, fell to his death from the third floor of a hotel in Buenos Aires while under the influence of “drugs or alcohol”, local police said. LA-based celebrity news website TMZ initially reported the story alongside graphic images of Payne’s body.

    After a backlash, TMZ removed the photos, but executive editor Michael Babock defended publication, claiming the site was “trying to confirm reports Liam had died before police had established his identity”.

    Other mainstream outlets published transcripts or recordings of a 911 call made to police shortly before Payne was found, and an Argentinian newspaper published images of Payne’s hotel room which included images of drugs paraphernalia.

    This is certainly not the first time the media, and TMZ in particular, has come under fire for insensitive or harmful reporting of celebrity deaths. When basketball great Kobe Bryant died in a helicopter crash in January 2020, TMZ shared the news before police were able to notify his family. Bryant’s widow later testified that she learned of her husband and daughter’s deaths through social media. This breaches the UK’s journalism codes of practice.

    In their quest to get a scoop, what precautions and sensitivities do journalists have to respect when it comes to reporting sudden and tragic deaths?

    Media guidelines and ethics

    The ethical standards and guidelines vary from country to country. In the UK,
    these are set out by the Independent Press Standards Organisation (Ipso) and independent press monitor Impress for print media, and by Ofcom for broadcasters.

    An Ipso clause around intrusion into grief and shock says journalists should make enquiries with “sympathy and discretion” and publication should be handled “sensitively”.

    Ofcom has similar guidelines for broadcasters. The section on privacy states: “When people are caught up in events which are covered by the news they still have a right to privacy.”

    This can be infringed if “warranted”, says Ofcom, for example if it is in the public interest. This could include revealing or detecting crime, protecting public health or safety, exposing misleading claims or disclosing incompetence. But a tragic death, even of a high profile person, is unlikely to meet this standard.

    Broadcasters should not interview or film people who have experienced a personal tragedy unless it is “warranted” or they have given consent. And journalists are advised not to “reveal the identity of someone who has died unless it is clear that the next of kin have been informed”.

    Impress, which regulates more independent journalism, has released a statement condemning the reporting of Payne’s death.

    It said: “The defence of publishing in the public interest does not give outlets carte blanche to report the most intimate details of a celebrity’s life, or their death.”

    It is important to state at this stage that what happened prior to Payne’s tragic death and his intentions at the time are unknown. It is the job of the coroner to investigate and come to a conclusion at his inquest.

    The effect of reporting on tragedy

    Beyond accuracy and respect for the victim of a tragedy and their family, there are wider concerns that journalists should take into account.

    Research conducted by the World Health Organization (WHO) has shown irresponsible media reporting of celebrity deaths, particularly suicides, can increase suicide rates.

    One study examining patterns of suicide and media coverage found that in the five months following comic Robin Williams’ death in 2014, there were 1,841 more deaths from suicide in the USA compared to the same period the previous year – a 9.85% rise.

    The WHO’s international guidelines for reporting suicide urge the media to avoid sensationalism. Journalists should not provide details about methods, and should include information about mental health resources in stories.

    Analysis of over 100 academic studies found repeated coverage and high-profile news stories were most strongly associated with copycat behaviour.

    The WHO states: “Such stories can inadvertently function as celebrity endorsements of suicidal behaviour and it is known that celebrity endorsements can have an impact on behaviour of the public.”

    Sensitive reporting can reduce the risk of copycat suicides. Providing context in relation to mental health challenges and offering resources for support is vital.

    In the UK, guidelines were first drawn up by the Samaritans charity in 1994 to improve reporting on suicide and prevent copycat attempts. These are taught to journalism students on courses accredited by the National Council for the Training of Journalists.

    Guidance includes avoiding “dramatic” headlines, emotive or sensational pictures or video footage and excessive amounts of coverage. Not speculating about the trigger or cause is urged, because it can oversimplify the issue.

    “Coverage that reflects the wider issues around suicide, including that it is preventable, can help reduce the risk of suicidal behaviour”, the guidelines state. “Include clear and direct references to resources and support organisations.”

    Making a change

    Despite all of these guidelines, many media outlets flout them in the race for clicks. It is heartening that there has been so much outrage at the publication of the images of Payne, but some members of the public still seem to have an insatiable appetite for it. Nothing, it seems, is off limits.

    We need to take collective responsibility. Journalists and editors should reacquaint themselves with responsible reporting guidelines and put themselves in the bereaved family’s shoes. Members of the public can also do their bit by not clicking on or sharing this kind of material, so editorial priorities change.

    Ultimately, our thoughts must be with Payne and his loved ones. A death so young is a real tragedy and those who loved him will be affected for the rest of their lives.


    If you’re struggling with suicidal thoughts, the following services can provide you with support:
    In the UK and Ireland – call Samaritans UK at 116 123.
    In the US – call the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline at 1-800-273-TALK (8255) or IMAlive at 1-800-784-2433.
    In Australia – call Lifeline Australia at 13 11 14.
    In other countries – visit IASP or Suicide.org to find a helpline in your country.

    Polly Rippon does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    – ref. Liam Payne: journalistic ethics are often ignored when celebrities die – https://theconversation.com/liam-payne-journalistic-ethics-are-often-ignored-when-celebrities-die-241631

    MIL OSI – Global Reports –

    January 24, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Evasion over child abuse questions and links to terror mean Unionists should be queueing up to sign no confidence motion

    Source: Traditional Unionist Voice – Northern Ireland

    Statement by TUV deputy leader Court Councillor Ron McDowell:

    “The questions surrounding Sinn Fein when it comes to the issue of child safety continue to grow in number and there will be few who will be filled with confidence that the decision of some member of the Executive Office Committee to furnish Ms O’Neill with their questions in advance of the meeting is a route which is likely to get to the truth. However, in addition to those profoundly important issues we now have confirmation that the IRA “Army Council” continues to exist, that the IRA is still involved in gathering intelligence, that it retains arms 19 years after they were supposedly decommissioned and that the IRA’s “Army Council” continues to oversee Sinn Féin’s overarching strategy.

    “Child safety is profound enough an issue to call into question the suitability of anyone to hold office. After this morning’s confirmation that nothing has changed when it comes to the IRA and the role of its leadership in Sinn Fein surely all Unionist MLAs will be queuing up to sign the TUV motion of no confidence on Monday morning?

    “Any Unionist who doesn’t sign it obviously does have confidence in Ms O’Neill. One is given to wonder what on earth Sinn Fein/IRA would have to do in order to lose it.”

    MIL OSI United Kingdom –

    January 24, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Global: My Fair Lady turns 60: a linguist on how the film has held up

    Source: The Conversation – UK – By Amanda Cole, Lecturer in Department of Language and Linguistics, University of Essex

    On October 21 1964, the iconic and much-celebrated film My Fair Lady premiered in Hollywood. Sixty years later, the film remains an enjoyable rollick full of catchy songs, but is not a wholly accurate depiction of what linguists do – certainly not nowadays at least.

    Linguists are far from the academics who are most frequently depicted in films. It’s normally the white-coat, work-in-a-lab, scientist-of-some-nondescript-sort professors who get to give stark warnings or unsettling research insights to the maverick protagonist. But My Fair Lady is a film all about linguistics (and also class, love and terrible Cockney accents – more on that later).

    In the film, Professor Henry Higgins (Rex Harrison), takes under his wing a Cockney flower seller called Eliza Doolittle (Audrey Hepburn). He wagers with his friend and fellow haughty linguist, Colonel Pickering, that he can teach her to speak “properly”.

    It seems at first there is no hope but – hoorah! – Eliza finally grasps it, suddenly blurting out “the rain in Spain stays mainly in the plain” in a perfect imitation of Queen’s English.

    Doolittle then dazzles at an embassy ball, the perfect replica of an upstanding posh woman – or, as the film’s title suggests, a “lady” (itself a problematic word which encodes sexist tropes about what should be aspirational and respectable for women).

    She even fools a man who has made a name for himself by identifying imposters based on their accent. Though, you may also wonder if she evades detection by barely speaking at the ball, converted into a demure and unforthcoming shadow of her previously forthright, unapologetic and garrulous self.

    Professor Higgins: not your typical linguist

    My Fair Lady avoids the common pitfall of assuming that the primary endeavour of the linguist is to learn as many different languages as they can, collecting them like stamps (the film Arrival can take note). But it still doesn’t get our job quite right.

    I, for one, have never groomed a young, destitute woman to speak “correctly” while moulding her into a “respectable”, posh woman (if only modern academia granted the breathing space for such folly).

    Linguists love, celebrate and are constantly itching to understand, study and explore the diverse tapestry of accents, dialects and languages that exist in the UK and around the world. We have no interest in reinforcing any societal ideal for a supposedly “correct” accent, or throwing a grammar rule book at unwitting members of the public.

    By contrast, Higgins is repulsed by any accent that is not Queen’s English (which, by a wonderful turn of luck, is also his accent). In the opening number, he has a pop at the dialects of Yorkshire, Cornwall, America, Scotland and Ireland.

    But he is particularly dismayed and repulsed that Doolittle, despite being from London, has a strong London accent (or she is meant to at least – I can only imagine Hepburn was instructed to open her mouth as wide as possible for all vowels and caw like a crow if all else fails).

    Higgins makes various proclamations which will have you shouting at the telly, “Steady on, Professor!”. In his words:

    Look at her, a prisoner of the gutter / Condemned by every syllable she ever utters / By right, she should be taken out and hung for the cold-blooded murder of the English tongue.

    Best not tell him “hanged” is the past tense of “hang” when referring to capital punishment, else he walk himself straight to the gallows.

    With a little bit of accent prejudice

    The real beast in disguise at the embassy ball is not young, Cockney, Eliza Doolittle. It is misogyny and contempt for the working class that hides behind a mask of maintaining good standards and protecting the English language.

    It is no coincidence that women and working-class people (and Cockneys who are often seen as emblematic of the working class) often bear the brunt of accent prejudice.

    Accent prejudice is a smokescreen for broader societal prejudice. My Fair Lady seems antiquated and quaint in many ways – like Higgins using a gramophone to play back recordings of Doolittle – but accent prejudice is alive and well.

    Women in the UK such as Alex Scott, Angela Rayner and Priti Patel still routinely face criticism, commentary and contempt for their regional accents.




    Read more:
    Ask or aks? How linguistic prejudice perpetuates inequality


    You might think that the film’s lesson is for Doolittle to take on the world with her freshly mastered “standard” accent. After all, she consented to being ridiculed and paraded around like a show dog as she felt her accent prevented her from getting a job in a flower shop. Now, nothing stands in her way.

    But people should not have to change their accent to get along – and it is not always possible or even a guaranteed ticket out of discrimination. If we take the accent out of accent prejudice, we are still left with the prejudice – let’s remove the prejudice and be left with the accent.

    We need more unapologetically working-class women with regional accents at the embassy ball, but also in politics, academia, in the media and in all walks of life.

    In the film, Doolittle ultimately feels she has been used and disrespected, leading her to sour on Higgins. After she leaves, he grows to miss her and wistfully plays back recordings of her voice.

    And this is the real lesson for viewers today. Higgins has gotten to know Doolittle as a person and now sees beyond her accent and his own prejudice. The more we hear people with regional accents, the more normal and uneventful it becomes, and the more we will focus on what they say and not how they say it.

    Amanda Cole does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    – ref. My Fair Lady turns 60: a linguist on how the film has held up – https://theconversation.com/my-fair-lady-turns-60-a-linguist-on-how-the-film-has-held-up-241030

    MIL OSI – Global Reports –

    January 24, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Investor Bulletin: Robo-Advisers

    Source: Securities and Exchange Commission

    Feb. 23, 2017

    The last few years have seen the growth in availability and popularity of automated digital investment advisory programs (often called “robo-advisers”).  These programs allow individual investors to create and manage their investment accounts through a web portal or mobile application, sometimes with little or no interaction with a human being with the potential benefit of lower costs than traditional investment advisory programs.  The SEC’s Office of Investor Education and Advocacy is issuing this Investor Bulletin to educate investors about these programs, and to help investors using robo-advisers to make informed decisions in meeting their investment goals.   

    What is a Robo-Adviser?

    The term “robo-adviser” generally refers to an automated digital investment advisory program.  In most cases, the robo-adviser collects information regarding your financial goals, investment horizon, income and other assets, and risk tolerance by asking you to complete an online questionnaire.  Based on that information, it creates and manages an investment portfolio for you.  Robo-advisers often seek to offer investment advice for lower costs and fees than traditional advisory programs, and in some cases require lower account minimums than traditional investment advisers.  The services provided, approaches to investing, and features of robo-advisers vary widely.  You can find information about these topics in the adviser’s Form ADV Part 1 and Part 2 brochure. 

    While robo-advisers have similarities to traditional investment advisory programs, there are also differences.  Before making a decision about whether to invest through a robo-adviser, or in deciding which robo-adviser might be best for you, you should do your own research.  Make sure the robo-adviser and the investment portfolio it puts together for you are a good match for your investment needs and goals, and that you understand the potential costs, risks, and benefits of using that particular robo-adviser.  Below we’ve highlighted some issues you may want to consider in making these important decisions.

    What Level of Interaction with a Person is Important to You?

    The amount of human interaction available to you may vary from one robo-adviser to another.  Some robo-advisers may offer the opportunity to contact an investment professional to discuss your investment needs (this hybrid of both automated and personal advice is sometimes referred to as “bionic” advice).  Other robo-advisers may only make technical support staff available, which will limit you to relying on the information on their websites or other sources you find to address your questions about investing. 

    If a robo-adviser does make an investment professional available to you, the format and amount of the interaction may also vary.  For example, a person may be available by email but not by phone, or available only for a limited number of in-person meetings.  In some cases, a robo-adviser may offer access to a person only for accounts that meet a certain minimum account size.  Still other robo-advisers may offer limited, if any, involvement of an investment professional in the creation and management of a client’s account.  

    Unlike a traditional investment adviser, there may be no initial or subsequent conversation with a person to gather information about you and your personal financial needs.  However, the robo-adviser may be able to offer you lower costs and fees by limiting the expense associated with a human adviser’s time. 

    As with any adviser, it is very important you take the time to learn about the robo-adviser’s services, including the level of interaction with a person, and find out answers to any questions you may have.  Here are a few questions to consider:

    • How much human interaction is important to you?  Would you like to be able to ask a person questions about your investments, the investment strategy being used, and potential risks? Would you like to be able to speak with a person during market events, such as periods of exceptional volatility or downturns?  Do you prefer being able to talk in person or on a phone, or is electronic communication fine with you?
    • What is your level of financial literacy, especially when it comes to investing?  Your ability to ask a person questions about investing (for example, about the robo-adviser’s investment strategy) may be limited and you may need to rely almost entirely on the robo-adviser’s online disclosures or other sources of information that you find on your own.  Are you comfortable using online resources?
    • As with a traditional adviser, you may be interested in how often you will have contact with the robo-adviser.  For example, how often does the robo-adviser follow-up with clients to confirm any changes that would affect their investment choices?  Would you have to contact the robo-adviser with any updates to your financial situation? 

    What Information is the Robo-Adviser Using to Create a Recommendation?

    A robo-adviser uses information you provide to create a recommendation.  As a result, a robo-adviser’s recommendation is limited by the information it requests and receives from you, typically through an online questionnaire.  It is important to keep in mind that some robo-advisers may obtain and consider only limited information about you.  In addition, as with traditional advisers, in many cases the burden to update this information will fall on you.  Here are a few questions to consider:

    • Would you use the robo-adviser for a specific financial goal (for example, retirement, buying a home, or investing for your children’s education), or to meet your overall financial needs more broadly?  Does the robo-adviser’s recommendation take into account your purpose in using the robo-adviser?   
    • Does the robo-adviser’s recommendation take into account relevant personal financial information, given your goal?  For example, does the robo-adviser ask for information about high interest credit card debt or student loans you may have? Does it take into account your bank and savings accounts? Does it take into account your real estate holdings, such as your home, or other investments such as retirement accounts? Does it take into account other assets that you have?
    • How does the robo-adviser take into account your tolerance for risk?  How you respond to the robo-adviser’s questions about risk can affect what portfolio the robo-adviser recommends. In addition to the initial makeup of your portfolio, how does your risk tolerance impact how the robo-adviser might rebalance your portfolio (for example, in the event of a market decline)?   

    What is the Robo-Adviser’s Approach to Investing?

    Different robo-advisers have different approaches to investing, including different investment styles and different products offered.  Some have several pre-determined portfolios of investments that they will recommend for you that you may or may not be able to customize.  Some robo-advisers focus solely on a limited range of investment products, such as broad-based exchange-traded funds, or ETFs. 

    Exchange-Traded Funds  
    Many robo-advisers utilize ETFs.  ETFs have unique characteristics that may make them more suitable for certain investors and less suitable for others.  To learn more about ETFs, including how they differ from mutual funds, read our Investor Bulletin: Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs).  Also, certain robo-advisers may use hypothetical performance for newer ETFs in their marketing materials.  To learn more about performance claims, read our Investor Bulletin: Performance Claims

    Some robo-advisers may recommend emerging market funds or invest in smaller companies, which could be more volatile or potentially less liquid.  The investment style of the robo-adviser can make a big difference in the asset allocation of your portfolio.  In addition, some robo-advisers have additional features that can affect returns on your investment.  Also, in some cases robo-advisers may not have been tested under stressed market conditions. 

    You should take the time to understand how the robo-adviser develops a portfolio recommendation, and what pieces of information it uses – or does not use – in developing the portfolio.  Here a few questions to consider:

    • Does the robo-adviser offer a limited range of investment products, such as only ETFs?  Are the investment products utilized by the robo-adviser appropriate for your goals?  
    • Does the robo-adviser only offer certain limited portfolios within those investment products?  How many different portfolios could your money possibly be invested in?  What portfolio does the robo-adviser recommend for you and why? 
    • What type of accounts does the robo-adviser manage?  For example, does the robo-adviser manage individual retirement accounts (IRAs)? Taxable accounts? 401(k) accounts or college savings plans?
    • How does the robo-adviser handle volatility? For example, does the robo-adviser have the ability to freeze sales (not let you sell your investments for cash for a certain period of time)?
    • How often is your account rebalanced?  Rebalancing can have tax implications, depending on the type of account.  What would trigger a change in the asset allocation or investment categories of your portfolio?

    Tax Loss Harvesting
    Does the robo-adviser utilize tax loss harvesting? Tax loss harvesting involves selling investments that have experienced losses in your account, which may result in tax implications.  The value of tax loss harvesting can depend on your particular tax situation in a given year.  It also may implicate rules against wash sales.  Make sure you understand the tax implications of any sales, and consider whether you may wish to consult a tax adviser.  For more information about wash sales, read IRS Publication 550, Investment Income and Expenses (Including Capital Gains and Losses).

    What Fees and Costs Will the Robo-Adviser Charge?

    Fees and other costs can greatly impact your return on investment.  One of the main benefits of a robo-adviser can be lower fees and costs – so it is very important that you understand what you would be charged.  A robo-adviser may offer lower-cost investment advice, but if the robo-adviser utilizes investment products with high costs, your total overall costs could still be high.  It’s important to understand your total costs.

    Also, in some cases, a robo-adviser may offer services that are not significantly different from services you could obtain through a traditional investment advisory program or through investing in a product such as a target date retirement fund.  It is worth considering whether one product or service can offer what you need at a lower overall cost than another.  Here are a few questions to consider:

    • What fees would you be charged directly by the robo-adviser? Are there any other costs (e.g., brokerage fees, management fees for ETFs purchased for your account) that you would pay directly or indirectly?
    • How is the robo-adviser compensated?  Does the way it is compensated create any conflicts of interest with you, the investor?  For example, is the robo-adviser paid to offer particular products or does it offer only products with which it is affiliated (e.g., mutual funds sponsored by the robo-adviser or its affiliates)?
    • Are there penalties or fees if you want to withdraw your investment, or transfer or close your account? Liquidating an account may have tax implications for you as well.
    • Does the amount you are charged depend on how much money you invest?
    • Can the costs and fees change over time?
    • Does the robo-adviser pay a referral or marketing fee, or other incentives for finding new clients?  Robo-advisers may use different marketing techniques, such as paying money to others or providing discounted fees for making client referrals.  You should understand if a robo-adviser has that kind of feature, even if you are not paying a fee yourself.

    Licensing and Registration – How Do You Find More Information?

    Firms that provide advisory services in the U.S. are typically registered as investment advisers with either the SEC or one or more state securities authorities.  Although the services that they provide are automated, robo-advisers in the U.S. must comply with the securities laws applicable to SEC or state-registered investment advisers.  Use the SEC’s Investment Adviser Public Disclosure (IAPD) database, which is available on Investor.gov, to research the background, including registration or license status and disciplinary history, of any individual or firm recommending an investment.  In addition, a firm that provides robo-adviser services may be affiliated with a broker that can execute the robo-adviser’s recommendations by buying and selling specific securities for your account.  You can research that broker using the Investment Adviser Public Disclosure (IAPD) database as well, which is again available on Investor.gov. 

    Finally, like traditional investment advisers, robo-advisers are also required to file a Form ADV.  Robo-advisers may also offer certain information about their advisory business on their websites or in communications with clients.  Check the robo-adviser’s website regularly to see if there is any updated information.   

    Additional Information

    Investor Alert: Automated Investment Tools

    Ask a question or report a problem concerning your investments, your investment account or a financial professional.  Report possible securities fraud. 

    Visit Investor.gov, the SEC’s website for individual investors.

    Receive Investor Alerts and Bulletins from the Office of Investor Education and Advocacy (“OIEA”) by email or RSS feed.  Follow OIEA on Twitter @SEC_Investor_Ed.  Like OIEA on Facebook at facebook.com/secinvestoreducation.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    January 24, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Investor Bulletin: Ten Things You Should Know About Investing

    Source: Securities and Exchange Commission

    The SEC’s Office of Investor Education and Advocacy is issuing this Investor Bulletin to provide investors basic information that may help them make informed financial decisions and avoid common scams.

    Whether you’re a first-time investor or have been investing for many years, there is some basic information you should know about investing.  Below is a list of ten investing-related pieces of information that may help you make sound financial decisions and avoid fraud. 

    Checking the background of an investment professional is easy and free.  Details on an investment professional’s background and qualifications are available through the SEC’s Investment Adviser Public Disclosure website and FINRA BrokerCheck.  If you have any questions on checking the background of an investment professional, call the SEC’s toll-free investor assistance line at (800) 732-0330.

    It can be costly to ignore the fees associated with buying, owning, and selling an investment product.  Expenses vary from product to product, and even small differences in these costs can translate into large differences in earnings over time.  An investment with high costs must perform better than a low-cost investment to generate the same returns for you.  In addition, some products are designed to be long-term investments.  If you need your money early, you may need to pay substantial surrender fees.

    Diversification can help reduce the overall risk of an investment portfolio.  By picking the right mix of investments, you may be able to limit your losses and reduce the fluctuations of your investment returns without sacrificing too much in potential gains.  Some investors achieve diversification through ownership of mutual funds or exchange-traded funds.

    Promises of high returns, with little or no associated risk, are classic warning signs for fraud.  Every investment carries some degree of risk and the potential for greater returns comes with greater risk.  Ignore so-called “can’t miss” investment opportunities or those promising “guaranteed returns” or, better yet, report them to the SEC.

    Any offer or sale of securities must be either registered with the SEC or exempt from registration.  Otherwise, it is illegal.  SEC registration is important because it provides investors access to key information about the company’s management, products, services, and finances.  While many companies that do not register or file reports with the SEC may be legitimate investments, you assume more risk when you invest in a company about which little or no information is publicly available.  Investors should always check whether an offering is registered with the SEC by using the SEC’s EDGAR database or contacting the SEC’s toll-free investor assistance line at (800) 732-0330.

    It can be risky to invest heavily in shares of any individual stock.  In particular, you should think twice before investing heavily in shares of your employer’s stock.  If the value of your employer’s shares declines significantly, or the company goes bankrupt, you may lose money and there’s a chance you might lose your job, too.

    Some investments provide tax advantages.  For example, employer-sponsored retirement plans and individual retirement accounts generally provide tax advantages for retirement savings, and 529 college savings plans also offer tax benefits.  Individuals who are interested in learning about the tax impact of their investment decisions should consult their tax adviser or visit the IRS website.

    Mutual funds, like other investments, are not guaranteed or insured by the FDIC or any other government agency.  This is true even if you buy a mutual fund through a bank and the fund carries the bank’s name.

    The key to avoiding investment fraud, including scams that target specific groups, is using independent information to evaluate financial opportunities. We see too many investors who might have avoided trouble and losses if they had asked questions from the start and verified the answers with sources outside of their family, community, or group.

    Examples of Common Persuasion Tactics Used In Investment Scams

    Research shows that con-artists are experts at the art of persuasion, often using a variety of influence tactics tailored to the vulnerabilities of their victims.  Common tactics include:

    • Phantom riches (dangling the prospect of wealth, enticing you with something you want but can’t have);
    • Source credibility (trying to build credibility by claiming to be with a reputable firm or to have a special credential or experience);
    • Social consensus (leading you to believe that other savvy investors have already invested);
    • Reciprocity (offering to do a small favor for you in return for a big favor); and
    • Scarcity (creating a false sense of urgency by claiming limited supply).

    Unbiased resources are available to help individuals make informed investing decisions.  Whether checking the background of an investment professional, researching an investment, or learning about new products or scams, unbiased information can be a significant advantage for investing wisely.  A good starting point for this information is the SEC’s Investor.gov website.

    RELATED INFORMATION

    We offer educational materials so that investors can develop an understanding of the securities industry and learn how to avoid costly mistakes and fraud.  Our educational materials also provide tips on how investors can invest wisely.  Investors can order our free publications by calling (800) SEC-0330, or access them on the Internet through the SEC’s Investor.gov website.  For additional educational information for investors, see the SEC’s Investor.gov website or the Office of Investor Education and Advocacy’s homepage.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    January 24, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Investor Bulletin: Behavioral Patterns of U.S. Investors

    Source: Securities and Exchange Commission

    In 2010, the SEC’s Office of Investor Education and Advocacy asked the Library of Congress’s Federal Research Division to prepare a report on behavioral traits of U.S. investors (Report). We are issuing this Investor Bulletin to remind investors about the Report’s findings and highlight the investing behaviors identified in the study that can undermine investment performance.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    January 24, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Security: RM of Tache — St-Pierre-Jolys RCMP respond to fatal two-vehicle collision

    Source: Royal Canadian Mounted Police

    On October 18, 2024, at approximately 1:40 am, St-Pierre-Jolys RCMP responded to a report of a two-vehicle collision in the eastbound lane of Highway 1, located between Road 27E and Road 28E, in the RM of Tache.

    The initial investigation has determined that a vehicle, travelling westbound in the eastbound lane, collided with an eastbound semi-trailer. Both vehicles entered the ditch and caught on fire.

    The 36-year-old male driver of the semi-trailer along with his 37-year-old male passenger were treated on scene for minor injuries.

    The driver, and lone occupant of the vehicle, was pronounced deceased on scene. The deceased has not yet been identified.

    St Pierre-Jolys RCMP, along with an RCMP Forensic Collision Reconstructionist, continue to investigate.

    MIL Security OSI –

    January 24, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Readout: Foreign Secretary meeting with Chinese Foreign Minister

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Foreign Secretary David Lammy met Foreign Minister of the People’s Republic of China, Wang Yi, in Beijing today.

    Foreign Secretary David Lammy met Foreign Minister of the People’s Republic of China, Wang Yi, in Beijing today (18 October).

    The Foreign Secretary set out that as fellow Permanent Members of the UN Security Council, it is a necessity that the UK and China increase bilateral engagement. He made clear that, as global players, both countries have an obligation to work together to find pragmatic solutions to complex challenges. 

    Areas of pragmatic, mutually beneficial cooperation were clear. This included working together on achieving the global green transition; making greater efforts on development and global health; and the safe use of AI. The Foreign Secretary reiterated his commitment to promoting secure and resilient growth through increased trade and investment which creates jobs, drives innovation, boosts productivity and provides economic stability and certainty for the UK economy. They agreed that the UK and China can support both countries’ growth objectives, with China as the world’s second largest economy and the UK’s 4th largest trading partner.

    The Foreign Secretary also raised a number of foreign policy and security matters, including Russia’s war in Ukraine, where he stated how both the UK and China have a shared interest in European peace and ending the war. He reaffirmed that concerns over China’s supply of equipment to Russia’s military industrial complex risks damaging China’s relationships with Europe whilst helping to sustain Russia’s war. The Foreign Secretary urged Wang Yi to take all measures to investigate and to prevent Chinese companies from supplying Russia’s military. The Foreign Ministers agreed to continue to discuss this and other broader foreign policy issues, such as the ongoing conflict in the Middle East.

    Human Rights were discussed, including in Xinjiang, and the Foreign Secretary referenced this as an area which the UK and China must engage, even where viewpoints diverge. Hong Kong is a shared interest, and the Foreign Secretary raised serious concerns around the implementation of the National Security Law and the ongoing treatment of British national Jimmy Lai, again calling for his release. 

    The meeting was constructive across the full breadth of the bilateral relationship, from areas of pragmatic cooperation to issues of contention. Both the Foreign Secretary and Foreign Minister agreed that maintaining channels of communication was essential and committed to holding regular discussions across their respective governments at Ministerial level.

    Media enquiries

    Email newsdesk@fcdo.gov.uk

    Telephone 020 7008 3100

    Contact the FCDO Communication Team via email (monitored 24 hours a day) in the first instance, and we will respond as soon as possible.

    Share this page

    The following links open in a new tab

    • Share on Facebook (opens in new tab)
    • Share on Twitter (opens in new tab)

    Updates to this page

    Published 18 October 2024

    MIL OSI United Kingdom –

    January 24, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Security: Connecticut Fisherman Sentenced to Prison for Evading Taxes on More Than $1.4 Million in Income

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    BOSTON –– A Connecticut man was sentenced on Oct. 16, 2024 for evading taxes on income he earned from commercial fishing in Massachusetts.

    Brian Kobus, 49, of Durham, Conn., was sentenced by U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton to one year and one day in prison, to be followed by one year of supervised release. Kobus was also ordered to pay restitution to the United States of $377,839. In July 2024, Kobus pleaded guilty to two counts of tax evasion.

    Kobus worked as a commercial fisherman and deckhand for various fishing companies in Massachusetts for over 30 years, earning over $1.4 million in taxable income between 2011 and 2013 and between 2017 and 2021. The companies paid Kobus by check after each fishing trip and provided Kobus with IRS forms which detailed his earnings and made clear that no taxes had been withheld. Despite this, Kobus never filed a federal income tax return or paid the taxes he owed on this income. Kobus intentionally concealed his income by immediately cashing each paycheck and paying for all of his personal expenses in cash. In total, Kobus caused a tax loss to the IRS of approximately $377,839.90.

    Acting United States Attorney Joshua S. Levy; Acting Deputy Assistant Attorney General Stuart M. Goldberg of the Justice Department’s Tax Division; and Harry Chavis, Jr., Special Agent in Charge of the Internal Revenue Service’s Criminal Investigations in Boston made the announcement. Assistant U.S. Attorney Victor Wild of the Securities, Financial & Cyber Fraud Unit and Trial Attorney Matthew L. Cofer of the Justice Department’s Tax Division prosecuted the case.
     

    MIL Security OSI –

    January 24, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Merkley, Wyden Announce Major Federal Funding to Protect Portland’s Kids from Lead-Based Paint

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Ron Wyden (D-Ore)

    October 16, 2024

    Washington, D.C. – Oregon’s U.S. Senators Jeff Merkley and Ron Wyden announced today $7.75 million in federal funding was awarded to the City of Portland to keep young children safe from lead-based paint hazards in older homes.

    “No Oregonian—regardless of where they live—should have to worry about whether their home is poisoning them or their children,” said Merkley. “This federal funding will help Portland address the threats posed by remnants of lead-based paint hazards. I will continue to fight for more resources to ensure that every Oregonian has a safe place to call home.”

    “All Oregonians should feel safe in their homes free of fear that lead paint threatens their health or that of their loved ones,” Wyden said. “I’m gratified these federal resources will aid Portland’s work to reduce the dangers of lead paint, and I’ll keep battling to secure similar investments for communities all across Oregon.”

    The federal funding comes from the Fiscal Year 2024 Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction Grant Program under the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The purpose of this program is to protect children under the age of six years from the impacts of lead-based paint poisoning, especially kids in low-income and underserved communities, who are among the most at risk. Funds can be used to fix older housing, preserve affordable housing, and enhance lead hazard control efforts by identifying and addressing other housing-related health risks to keep children and families healthy and safe.

    The City of Portland will specifically use its $7.75 million Lead Hazard Reduction and Healthy Home Supplemental grant to serve 136 Portland households over four years.

    “We are deeply honored and grateful for this vital support from HUD,” said Portland Housing Bureau Director Helmi Hisserich. “This funding allows us to do more than just repair homes—it empowers us to protect the health and well-being of our youngest and most vulnerable residents. By ensuring every child can grow up in a safe, healthy environment, we’re improving lives today and building stronger communities and a brighter future for Portland.”

    MIL OSI USA News –

    January 24, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Council welcomes conviction for Bully dog attack

    Source: Northern Ireland City of Armagh

    A Banbridge man has been convicted in court for being the keeper of a Bully dog which mauled and seriously injured a man two years ago.

    On Thursday 17 October, Gabriel McCauley of Ballygowan Park was convicted of a dog control offence under Article 29 of the Dogs (NI) Order 1983 (as amended) for being the keeper of a Bully dog which attacked another person.

    In response to the attack, which occurred on October 3, 2022 at Havelock Park, the Dog Warden team from Armagh City, Banbridge and Craigavon Borough Council attended the scene alongside police officers. The dog was brought under control before being humanely destroyed.

    At Banbridge Magistrates Court, sitting in Newry on Thursday – Mr McCauley was found guilty of the offence and was fined £500, with a £15 offenders levy and the Council awarded costs of £300.

    A Council spokesperson welcomed the conviction for the attack, and said it was important that all owners of XL Bully dogs comply with the new laws for keeping these dogs.

    “This was an extremely serious attack which has left the victim with life-changing injuries, so it is welcome that the owner is brought before court and convicted,” they said.

    “We want to emphasise that the Council operates a rigorous enforcement policy on dog control, and we also want to ensure that everyone is aware of the new rules around owning these XL Bully dogs.

    “Owners need to keep their dog muzzled and on a lead when in public places. The dog must be kept in secure conditions that will stop it from escaping.

    “Furthermore, owners are not allowed to breed, sell, exchange, gift or abandon an XL Bully type dog.”

    Across Northern Ireland, it will be illegal to own an XL Bully dog without an Exemption Certificate from January 1, 2025. The application process for XL Bully dog exemptions is now open and will close on December 31, 2024.

    To apply for an exemption certificate please visit – http://www.armaghbanbridgecraigavon.gov.uk/resident/dog-control/#xlbullyguidance

    For more information on the new XL Bully dog legislation – please visit https://www.nidirect.gov.uk/articles/xl-bully-dogs

    MIL OSI United Kingdom –

    January 24, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Issa: The Terrorist Sinwar is Dead – Israel is Alive and Strong

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Darrell Issa (CA-50)

    WASHINGTON – Congressman Darrell Issa (CA-48) released the following statement:

    “The elimination of Yahya Sinwar is both overdue and richly deserved. He was not only the architect of October 7th, but also a lifelong unapologetic terror master completely committed to the destruction of Israel. He was also responsible for untold deaths and had American blood on his hands. The Middle East is a better place without him, and the prospect for an enduring peace with security for Israel and the region is more possible today than yesterday.
     
    “This also validates the strategic approach of the Netanyahu government that terror can be targeted, its most brutal practitioners taken out, and free people safer as a result. It also proves that the Biden Administration – which has repeatedly and publicly criticized our ally Israel – was consistently wrong to do so. Today we say once again: Terror must lose. Israel must win.”

    MIL OSI USA News –

    January 24, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Velázquez Reiterates Call for Federal Electoral Monitors in Puerto Rico

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Nydia M Velázquez (D-NY)

    [WASHINGTON] — Today, Congresswoman Nydia M. Velazquez (D-NY) released the following statement after the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) appointment of a District Election Officer to oversee voting rights violations in Puerto Rico under the Election Day Program:
     
    “The appointment of an election officer to address allegations of fraud, discrimination, and intimidation in Puerto Rico is welcome news. However, this step does not address the island’s deep structural electoral issues.
     
    “This type of electoral official is assigned to every state in the nation. Puerto Ricans need more than a simple protocol announcement. They need targeted action to address the irregularities threatening the island’s democratic system. Allegations of poor management of the electoral register and ongoing disenfranchisement are undermining faith in the upcoming election. 
     
    “Three weeks ago, I led a call to DOJ requesting staff from the Civil Rights Division be deployed to directly monitor Puerto Rican elections. Given the ongoing threat to the right to vote in Puerto Rico, this move is appropriate and absolutely necessary. 
     
    “The DOJ recently announced that it will assign federal monitors to observe the election in Portage County, Ohio. There is no reason the same cannot be done in Puerto Rico. The DOJ has the authority, and there is more than enough evidence to intervene.
     
    “There are less than twenty days until the election. Puerto Rico needs fair and transparent elections, and I am determined to ensure that all available federal oversight mechanisms are in place. The DOJ must act now.”

    ###
     

    MIL OSI USA News –

    January 24, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Video: Coast Guard responds to Hurricane Helene and Hurricane Milton

    Source: US Coast Guard (video statements)

    U.S. Coast Guard District Seven Commander, Rear Admiral Douglas Schofield, discusses Coast Guard property damage after Hurricane Helene and Hurricane Milton struck the west coast of Florida Oct. 3, 2024, at Coast Guard Air Station Clearwater, Florida. Coast Guard crews responded to multiple search and rescue cases resulting in a total of 37 lives saved or assisted and eight pets rescued. (U.S. Coast Guard video by Petty Officer 2nd Class Jose Hernandez and Petty Officer 2nd Class Ian Gray)

    #USCG #Coastguard #hurricanemilton #hurricanehelene

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W-2uXb4rpDI

    MIL OSI Video –

    January 24, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Canada: Healthy meals for kids in Manitoba

    Source: Government of Canada News

    News release

    The federal government’s generational investments like the Canada Child Benefit, which provides families with up to nearly $8,000 per child, per year, help cover the costs of essentials children need. We’re building on this support by providing healthy meals at school, so children have what they need to learn, grow, and succeed—regardless of their family’s circumstances.

    October 18, 2024 – Winnipeg, Manitoba – Department of Finance Canada

    When children have access to healthy food, they do better in school and are set up to succeed.

    The federal government’s generational investments like the Canada Child Benefit, which provides families with up to nearly $8,000 per child, per year, help cover the costs of essentials children need. We’re building on this support by providing healthy meals at school, so children have what they need to learn, grow, and succeed—regardless of their family’s circumstances.

    Today, the Honourable Chrystia Freeland, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance, and the Honourable Wab Kinew, Premier of Manitoba, alongside the Honourable Jenna Sudds, Minister of Families, Children and Social Development and the Honourable Dan Vandal, Minister of Northern Affairs, announced that the governments of Canada and Manitoba have reached an agreement to expand school food programs in Manitoba. This agreement, made possible by the federal government’s $1 billion National School Food Program, will enhance and expand Manitoba’s existing school food programs to provide meals to about 19,080 more kids every year, starting this school year.

    Manitoba is the second province, after Newfoundland and Labrador, to sign an agreement with the federal government for the new National School Food Program. Today’s agreement includes an initial federal investment of approximately $17.2 million over the next three years to ensure more kids get the nutritious food they need to thrive. 

    The federal government invites all provinces and territories to help more kids get access to school food by reaching these agreements. It is one of the best investments we can make to lower costs, support families, and care for the next generation.

    With an investment of $1 billion over five years, the National School Food Program will feed up to 400,000 more kids across Canada every year. This is a generational investment, especially in the most vulnerable children, who are most impacted by a lack of access to food. Through today’s agreement, the federal government is helping children across Manitoba reach their full potential.

    Quotes

    “Giving our children the best start in life is an essential part of fairness for every generation. Today’s agreement with Manitoba will ensure that over 19,000 more children get the food they need at school, starting this year, while saving a family with two kids up to $800 on groceries annually. Our National School Food Program will cut costs for families and help build a Canada where every child is set up to succeed.”

    – The Honourable Chrystia Freeland,
    Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance

    “Kids can’t learn on an empty stomach. We made a commitment to Manitoba families that we’d make sure kids across our province had access to food when they go to school, and we’ve delivered on that promise. Kids across Manitoba can now get a meal or a snack when they need one, so they can concentrate, learn and reach their full potential.”

    – The Honourable Wab Kinew,
    Premier of Manitoba

    “It’s wonderful to see another province partner with us to deliver our National School Food Program. This agreement with the Government of Manitoba means that more of the top-quality, local food that our hardworking farmers produce will reach kids who need it and help set them up for success in the classroom and beyond.”

    – The Honourable Lawrence MacAulay,
    Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food

    “Today, we’re delivering a promise to the kids and parents of Manitoba—a promise that every child will have access to the healthy meals they need to succeed. It’s simple: when kids eat well, they learn better, play harder, and feel good. And for parents, it gives them peace of mind, knowing that their kids are getting the fuel they need to focus on just being kids. We will keep working to make sure that every family across Canada benefits from this program.”

    – The Honourable Jenna Sudds,
    Minister of Families, Children and Social Development

    “Every child deserves the best start in life. And that begins with ensuring that no one goes to school on an empty stomach. I’m incredibly proud that Manitoba is the second province to sign onto our National School Food Program, so we can fill the gap and make sure every child has the chance to thrive.”

    – The Honourable Dan Vandal,
    Minister of Northern Affairs

    Quick facts

    • In Budget 2024, the federal government launched a new National School Food Program, providing $1 billion over five years, to provide meals for up to 400,000 more kids each year, ensuring all children have the food they need to have the best start in life, regardless of their family circumstances.

      • The Program is expected to save the average participating family with two children $800 per year in grocery costs, with lower-income families benefitting the most.
      • Budget 2024’s investment of $1 billion over five years includes distinctions-based funding for First Nations on-reserve, as well as Inuit, Métis, and Modern Treaty and Self-Government agreement holders. The federal government is working directly with Indigenous partners to rollout that funding, with more information to come.
    • On June 20, 2024, the federal government released the National School Food Policy, as the foundation for collaborative and complementary action by all orders of government to improve access to food at school. 

    • In addition to the National School Food Program, the federal government launched the new School Food Infrastructure Fund in September, which will deliver $20.2 million to help not-for-profit organizations invest in infrastructure and equipment to support school food programming across Canada. 

    • In addition to today’s $17.2 million federal investment, the Government of Manitoba is investing $30 million to create a Universally Accessible School Nutrition Program for 2024-2025, which will deliver funding through three streams:

      • $15 million directly to Manitoba’s 37 school divisions;
      • $6 million to 50 schools in communities with high socioeconomic need; and,
      • $9 million in grants to community partners.
    • To give every child the best start in life, the federal government is also:

      • Giving families more money through the Canada Child Benefit to help with the costs of raising children and make a real difference in the lives of kids in Canada. The Canada Child Benefit, which is providing up to nearly $8,000 per child in 2024-25, is indexed annually to keep up with the cost of living and has helped lift hundreds of thousands of children out of poverty since its launch in 2016.
      • Building a Canada-wide system for $10-a-day child care, which has already cut fees for regulated child care to an average of $10-a-day or less in over half of all provinces and territories, and by 50 per cent or more in all others.
      • Rolling out the Canadian Dental Care Plan, which is already available for children under 18, with family incomes under $90,000, because no one should have to choose between taking care of their kids’ teeth and putting food on the table. Families are encouraged to apply online at Canada.ca/dental.

    Associated links

    Contacts

    Media may contact:

    Katherine Cuplinskas
    Deputy Director of Communications
    Office of the Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance
    Katherine.Cuplinskas@fin.gc.ca

    Media Relations
    Department of Finance Canada
    mediare@fin.gc.ca
    613-369-4000

    General enquiries

    Phone: 1-833-712-2292
    TTY: 613-369-3230
    E-mail: financepublic-financepublique@fin.gc.ca

    Stay Connected

    MIL OSI Canada News –

    January 24, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Global: Getting carbon capture right will be hard – but that doesn’t make it optional

    Source: The Conversation – UK – By Myles Allen, Professor of Geosystem Science, Director of Oxford Net Zero, University of Oxford

    Kodda / Shutterstock

    The UK government has given the go-ahead to carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS) schemes worth £22 billion (US$28.6 billion). Critics are insisting that this technology – which involves capturing carbon as it is emitted or taking it back out of the atmosphere, then pumping it into rocks deep underground – is unsafe, unproven and unaffordable. Defenders are responding with painstaking rebuttals.

    Could the whole debate be missing the point? I think it is better to focus on the big picture – why we need CCS to work – rather than playing whack-a-mole with every objection to individual projects.

    The case for CCS boils down to waste disposal: we are going to make too much carbon dioxide (CO₂), so we need to start getting rid of it, permanently.

    By burning fossil fuels and producing cement alone, we will generate more CO₂ than we can afford to dump into the atmosphere to have any chance of limiting global warming to close to 1.5°C – even after accounting for the capacity of the biosphere and oceans to mop it up.

    So, we need to start disposing of that CO₂, safely and permanently, on a scale of billions of tonnes a year by mid-century. And the only proven way of doing this right now is to re-inject it back underground.

    Keep our options open

    The world is not giving up fossil fuels any time soon, and the transition is going to be difficult enough without tying our hands by ruling out using CCS technology.

    The questions we should be asking are: will “green hydrogen” – a low-carbon fuel produced from water using renewable electricity – be a cheaper way of dealing with lulls in renewable energy generation than gas-fired power plants fitted with CCS? And, can we get by entirely on recycled steel, and eliminate the use of conventional cement in construction, when steel and cement are notoriously hard to produce without fossil fuels?

    If the answer to any of these questions, anywhere in the world, turns out to be “no” – or even “not by 2050” – then we need CCS.

    Would taking CCS off the table focus minds and make us abandon fossil fuels faster? Perhaps, but it could equally make us abandon climate targets – ultimately, the most expensive option of all.

    We should be conscious of “lifecycle emissions” for all forms of energy – including, for example, green hydrogen made with electricity from solar panels that were manufactured using coal-fired power. The right response is to find cleaner suppliers of solar panels for green hydrogen, and cleaner suppliers of gas for blue hydrogen. The wrong response is to give up on either fuel source.

    Nature is maxed out

    What about offsetting continued fossil fuel use with nature-based solutions, such as restoring ecosystems and rewilding? Unfortunately, we are already maxing out nature’s credit card.

    In the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) scenarios in which warming is kept close to 1.5°C, we need to eliminate deforestation almost immediately, and restore a cumulative total of 250 billion tonnes of CO₂ to the biosphere over the coming 75 years – by restoring forests and wetlands, for example.

    Over the same period, we also need to dispose of four times that amount of CO₂ back underground through various forms of CCS – after slashing the amount of CO₂ we produce by 75%-80%.

    We cannot bank on stuffing an additional trillion tonnes of CO₂ into the biosphere over the next 75 years – especially as more Earth system feedbacks emerge and accelerate, whereby carbon stored at the Earth’s surface is re-released to the atmosphere as the world warms, forests burn, and peatlands dry out.

    Invest, but invest wisely

    To limit global warming to the extent the planet urgently requires, we need a means of permanent CO₂ disposal that does not make further demands on the biosphere. But at the same time as enabling CCS technology, we also need to make sure its availability does not encourage yet more CO₂ emissions.

    This is where critics of government policy may have a point. If CCS is widely available and heavily subsidised, will that just encourage individuals and companies to use more fossil fuels? The danger is real, but it doesn’t mean we should abandon CCS. We need to be smart about how it is implemented.

    Given the way the first CCS projects were set up by the previous UK government, an initial injection of £22 billion from taxpayers is, by now, the only way to kickstart a CO₂ disposal industry. But this should not become an endless subsidy which allows private industry to keep profiting from selling the stuff that causes global warming, while taxpayers pay for the clean-up.

    Fortunately, there is another way. The EU has shown, in its Net Zero Industry Act, how regulation can force the fossil fuel industry to contribute to the cost of CCS without relying on US-style subsidies.

    The UK government could make it clear that, by mid-century, anyone selling fossil fuels in the UK will be responsible for permanently disposing all CO₂ generated by their activities and the products they sell.

    Pricing in safe CO₂ disposal would make fossil fuels more expensive, potentially adding 5p per kWh to the cost of natural gas over the next 25 years. That’s cheap compared with the cost of just dumping CO₂ into the atmosphere.

    It is possible, and even affordable, to ensure fossil fuel use falls to meet our available CO₂ disposal capacity. There again, building a global CO₂ disposal industry from a standing start in only 25 years will be hard.

    Fortunately, the UK has the right geology, skills and expertise, as well as a history of innovation in climate policy. It also has a clear interest in getting involved in what should become one of the major industries of the second half of this century. And it has a moral obligation, having pioneered taking fossil carbon out of the Earth’s crust, to join the first wave of countries putting it back.



    Don’t have time to read about climate change as much as you’d like?

    Get our award-winning weekly roundup in your inbox instead. Every Wednesday, The Conversation’s environment editor writes Imagine, a short email that goes a little deeper into just one climate issue. Join the 35,000+ readers who’ve subscribed so far.


    Myles Allen receives funding from the Strategic Research Fund of the University of Oxford and the European Commission. He is a member of the Advisory Board of Puro.Earth.

    – ref. Getting carbon capture right will be hard – but that doesn’t make it optional – https://theconversation.com/getting-carbon-capture-right-will-be-hard-but-that-doesnt-make-it-optional-241515

    MIL OSI – Global Reports –

    January 24, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Canada: Supporting Jasper’s tourism recovery

    Source: Government of Canada regional news

    Jasper’s value is beyond measure. For decades, Jasper has been a place where families and friends from Alberta and across the world have travelled to experience the incredible Canadian Rockies, connect with locals and make memories that last a lifetime.

    As Jasper has a tourism-based economy, tourism is essential for the recovery of the community. Alberta’s government is committed to that recovery, and the recovery of the tourism sector in Jasper and surrounding areas. As a show of that commitment, Alberta’s government has earmarked $2.5 million to support Jasper’s tourism industry.

    “Tourism is the backbone of Jasper’s economy, and for the town to rebuild, we need to see a strong return of tourism businesses, accommodation providers, services and experiences. This funding will help Jasper’s tourism businesses prepare to welcome visitors this fall and winter, ensuring they remain viable and ready for next summer.”

    Joseph Schow, Minister of Tourism and Sport

    “The return of visitors is essential for the health and well-being of Jasper. I am grateful that Minister Schow and Travel Alberta are ensuring that the recovery of the community of Jasper and the tourism businesses is a priority for the Government of Alberta.”

    Martin Long, MLA for West Yellowhead

    Alberta’s government recognizes that Jasper’s recovery, and that of its tourism industry, requires long-term support. This initial funding through Travel Alberta is aimed at supporting businesses and tourism operators in their early work to rebuild. In the immediate aftermath of the fires, this funding helped support the Jasper is Recovering campaign, and will support promotional activities to encourage visitation this fall and winter, sustainability funding for Tourism Jasper, and funding for existing tourism businesses to activate fall and winter experiences.

    As Alberta’s destination management organization, Travel Alberta works to promote Alberta as a premier tourism destination and grow Alberta’s visitor economy through supporting destination development and close partnerships with tourism businesses provincewide.

    “We know that this fall and winter will be critical to the long-term success of Jasper’s recovery. This investment will help Jasper tourism operators expand their offerings while inviting travellers to come make new memories in this special place, supporting the community as it rebuilds.”

    Jon Mamela, chief commercial officer, Travel Alberta

    “A strong and thriving visitor economy is essential for our residents to rebuild swiftly and continue welcoming visitors to Jasper. These funds will provide direct support to our tourism operators and help reinforce the message that Jasper is open for business this fall and into the winter season. We are deeply grateful for the support and contributions of our provincial tourism partners.”

    Tyler Riopel, CEO, Tourism Jasper

    Jasper represents an important destination for Alberta’s tourism sector, accounting for 22 to 25 per cent of tourism expenditures in the Canadian Rockies. For more information on Travel Alberta programs, please visit the Travel Alberta Industry Hub webpage.

    Related information

    • Travel Alberta Industry Hub
    • Higher Ground: A Tourism Sector Strategy

    Related news

    • Alberta tourism soars to new heights (Sept. 26, 2024)
    • Growing Alberta’s visitor economy (Feb. 14, 2024)

    MIL OSI Canada News –

    January 24, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: New Landsat Science Team Request for Proposals Now Open

    Source: US Geological Survey

    Breadcrumb

    1. News

    New Landsat Science Team Request for Proposals Now Open

    The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and NASA have officially opened a Request for Proposals (RFP) for the 2025-2029 Landsat Science Team. This team will play a pivotal role in shaping the future of the Landsat program, supporting the ongoing operations of Landsat 8 and 9 while contributing to the development of Landsat Next, which is set to launch in 2030/2031.

    Selected members will serve for a term up to five years and will focus on providing relevant science and technical evaluations and recommendations on a number of issues pertinent to the Landsat program, maximizing the value of the Landsat archive, and addressing the unique challenges of next-generation Earth observation systems.

    Issues of interest include support for current and future Landsat missions, maximizing value of the Landsat data archive for users, future science needs and applications, research innovations to advance Landsat applications, and scientific issues associated with the Landsat Next mission. A core functionality is to ensure that the Landsat archive—spanning over 50 years—remains compatible with future missions like Landsat Next, while maintaining the high-quality standards that Landsat is known for. The team will also explore synergy with other Earth observations systems such as the European Copernicus Sentinel-2 missions.

    The RFP encourages a broad representation from academia, government, and industry. Proposals should reflect various expertise in areas such as optical imaging, multi-spectral data, and remote sensing applications.

    Interested applicants should submit their proposals by December 17, 2024. For more information and submission guidelines, visit https://sam.gov/opp/07db5e5e8ec34b2abea7851a53be03e7/view
     

    MIL OSI USA News –

    January 24, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA News: Remarks by President  Biden and Chancellor Olaf Scholz of Germany in Joint Statements to the Press | Berlin,  Germany

    Source: The White House

    German Chancellery
    Berlin, Germany

    12:34 P.M. CEST

    CHANCELLOR SCHOLZ:  (As interpreted.)  Mr. President. 

    (Speaking English.)  Dear Joe, it is my great pleasure to welcome you here to the Chancellery in Berlin as a friend of Europe, as a friend of Germany, and, above all, as my friend.  Welcome.

    (As interpreted.)  Dear Joe, our cooperation the past three years was extraordinarily close and full of trust.  I know that this is not something that we can take for granted, even among good partners as the U.S. and Germany have been for many, many decades. 

    I would like to take this opportunity here and today to express my gratitude and say thank you.  Thank you, Mr.  President. 

    The times in which we’re living are extremely challenging indeed.  With Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, war has returned back to Europe.  The European security order has been shaken in its very foundations. 

    It is all the more important that we reacted decisively and stood closely together and unequivocably condemned this blatant violation of international law and stand by our Ukrainian friends’ side. 

    It is thanks to your leadership that Putin’s plans failed, that Ukraine wasn’t overrun within a few days.  But it is thanks to the bravery of Ukrainian armed forces and the support of many states — above all, the United States and Germany — Ukraine stands up to imperialist Russia since more than two and a half years. 

    Together, we commit to Ukraine’s sovereignty and integrity so that Russia cannot subjugate Ukraine by force.  We stand by Ukraine’s side as long as it is necessary.  Putin has miscalculated.  He cannot sit and ride out this war.

    Together, therefore, we decided, with our G7 partners, to support Ukraine with a loan package to the tune of 50 billion U.S. dollars by the end of this year. 

    Together, we commit to a strong NATO Alliance which defends every square inch of its territory.  Every member of our alliance can rely on that.  And together, we commit to the fundamental principles of the free world as enshrined in the Charter of the United Nations. 

    Mr. President, from the very beginning of the war, we closely coordinated ourselves across the Atlantic.  It has made us strong.  It has made the Alliance strong, and we will continue to do that. 

    Our position is clear.  We continue to support Ukraine as strongly as possible.  At the same time, we are making sure that NATO does not become a party to this war so that this war does not lead to an even bigger catastrophe.  We are very much aware of this responsibility, and no one can shoulder this responsibility for us. 

    Of course, the situation in the Middle East is also on our agenda.  The barbaric terrorist attacks of Hamas on Israel of October 7th has massively destabilized the situation. 

    Israel has the right to defend itself.  It is important to me to say this very clearly.  We stand by Israel’s side, and we fully agree that it is now more important than ever before to prevent further escalation and a regional conflagration.

    With the death of Hamas leader Sinwar, who was responsible for the horrific terrorist attacks, we hopefully now see a tangible prospect of a ceasefire in Gaza, an agreement that leads to the release of hostages held by Hamas. 

    Joe, your efforts — we always supported your efforts in this conflict, and we will continue to do so.  Our common objective remains a credible political process towards a two-state solution, and we will continue to be fully committed to that. 

    In Lebanon, we’re working towards a situation that the conflict leads to a diplomatic process as soon as possible.  It is clear the people in Northern Israel have to be able to live free of fear and insecurity.  Lebanon deserves a future in self-determination, stability, and security. 

    Originally, your visit was scheduled to take place last Friday and had to be postponed due to the severe hurricanes.  And I’m delighted that you were able to come today.  It affords us the opportunity to talk about the challenging global situation in great detail bilaterally but also together with the French president, Emmanuel Macron, and the British Prime Minister, Keir Starmer, who will join us later. 

    In my view, we need such talks at highest levels to make progress in the most important, pressing issues. 

    (In English.)  Joe, thanks again for taking the time for this visit.  It is a strong signal of our transatlantic unity and of our friendship.

    Please.

    PRESIDENT BIDEN:  Well, Chancellor — Olaf, it’s great to see you again, and I do apologize for having to cancel the first time around, but we did have a crisis in our southeastern border with hurricanes and tornadoes.  But we’re here because Germany is — Germany is my country’s closest and most important of allies. 

    When Putin launched his brutal invasion in Ukraine, you reminded us all why this alliance is so essential.  Under your leadership, Chancellor, Germany rose to meet the moment.  You showed the wisdom to recognize that this war marked a turning point in the history, an assault on the very principles of the protected peace and security in Europe for more than 75 years. 

    And then you summoned the resolve to act, remaking Germany’s foreign policy to reckon new realities — with new realities to stand strong and steadfast with Ukraine. 

    America and Germany are the two largest supporters of Ukraine in its fight for survival as a free and independent nation.  As Ukraine faces a tough winter, we must — we must sustain our resolve, our effort, and our support. 

    And I know the cost is heavy, but make no mistake, it pales in comparison to the cost of living in the world where aggression prevails, where large states attack and bully smaller ones simply because they can. 

    Today, the chancellor and I are going to discuss ongoing efforts to surge support to Ukraine’s military; to shore up Ukraine’s civilian energy infrastructure, which is under constant assault and bombardment from Russia; and to help Ukraine recover by unlocking the value of frozen Russian assets.

    I also want to recognize Germany’s decision to spend 2 percent of your gross domestic product on defense.  Please keep it up, because it matters. 

    Our alliance with Germany extends far beyond Ukraine and Europe.  It’s global. 

    Today, the chancellor and I will discuss regional security in the Middle East, including the ongoing domestic efforts regarding Lebanon and Gaza. 

    The death of the leader of Hamas represents a moment of justice.  He had the blood of Americans and Israelis, Palestinians and Germans, and so many others on his hands.

    I told the prime minister of Israel yesterday: Let’s also make this moment an opportunity to seek a path to peace, a better future in Gaza without Hamas.  And I look forward to discussing Iran. 

    Olaf and I spoke the morning after Iran launched 200 ballistic missiles at Israel earlier this month.  With our G7 counterparts, we agreed to coordinate our response through sanctions and other measures, and that is what we have done. 

    I’m grateful for Germany’s cooperation holding Iran accountable for destabilizing policies, including providing missiles and drones to Russia to use against Ukraine. 

    And just this week, the European Union followed Germany, the UK, and France in sanctioning Iran’s leading airlines.  This followed our own oil sanctions.  This coordination is going to have to continue. 

    I also want to thank Germany for standing firm against a vicious surge of antisemitism, hatred, and extremism we’re witnessing today.  Some of it fueled by foreign misinformation.

    As domestic — as democratic allies, we have to remain ever vigilant against what I call the “old ghosts in new garments,” ancient hatreds resurfacing.  Our charge is to make sure that the forces holding our societies together and binding us in the common cause of human dignity and freedom remain stronger — stronger than the forces seeking to pull us apart. 

    And finally, Chancellor, I deeply appreciate your partnership and the many times you’ve forsaken the easy choice to make the right choice.  Your act of statesmanship and friendship has made possible the safe return and unjustly detained Americans and Germans and the reunion of brave Russian dissidents to their families.  I want to thank you, thank you, thank you. 

    I value our conversations, and I look forward to them — this one is — particularly.  And I want to — I really mean it — I want to thank you for your friendship, not only personally, but I don’t see how we maintain stability in Europe and around the world without a tight German-U.S. relationship.  And you’re the leader to do it. 

    Thank you. 

    12:45 P.M. CEST

    MIL OSI USA News –

    January 24, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: USGS Friday’s Findings – October 25, 2024

    Source: US Geological Survey

    Title:  The use of vaccination to mitigate white-nose syndrome in bats 

    Date:  October 25, 2024, at 2:00-2:30 pm Eastern/11:00 -11:30 am Pacific 

    Speakers: 
    Dr. Camille Hopkins, Wildlife Disease Specialist, USGS Ecosystems Mission Area
    Dr. Tonie Rocke, Research Epidemiologist, National Wildlife Health Center

    MIL OSI USA News –

    January 24, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA News: Remarks by President  Biden and President Frank-Walter Steinmeier of Germany at an Order of Merit Ceremony | Berlin,  Germany

    Source: The White House

    Bellevue Palace
    Berlin, Germany

    11:10 A.M. CEST

    PRESIDENT STEINMEIER:  Please have a seat.

    Mr. President, so good to have you here. 

    (Speaks German.)  (No translation provided.)

    Of the many stereotypes about Germany — our sense of humor — (laughter) — our spontaneity, our irresistible joie de vivre — (laughter) — only one is really true: We are good at keeping records. 

    So, 44 and a half years ago, when the young Senator Joseph Biden came to Bonn, a German civil servant — ein guter Beamter, as we like to say — made a note — a rather extensive one, I should say — of this senator’s visit.  And being Germans, you understand, we still have that note.  (Laughter.)  (Holds up a document.)  This one.  Many pages.

    (Speaks German.) (No translation provided.)

    That’s the content — the main content of report: “He is keenly interested in the Federal Republic of Germany,” the note concludes.  And it adds, “that this senator might look to a,” I quote again, “significant political future.”  (Laughter.)  “Significant.”  What a remarkable understatement. 

    Today, you are the 46th President of the United States.  And under your leadership, the transatlantic alliance is stronger and our partnership is closer than ever. 

    Mr. President, you are keenly interested in Germany.  That we have known for almost half a century.  So, it is time for you to know that Germany, in turn, is deeply grateful to you. 

    Let me say, in the name of my country, thank you, Mr.  President.  (Applause.) 

    For Germany, the friendship with the United States has been, is now, and will always be existentially important — existential both for our security and our democracy. 

    And yet, in this friendship, there have been and always will be times of proximity and greater distance, times of agreement and times of discord.  Even recently, just a handful years ago, the distance had grown so wide that we almost lost each other. 

    But — but, ladies and gentlemen, throughout the ups and downs of time, there have been people who have stood by the transatlantic relations no matter what.  And chief among those people, Mr. President, is you. 

    You stand with us, sir, because you know that what binds us is so much deeper than the news of the day.  What binds us is freedom, democracy, and the rule of law. 

    What binds us is the conviction that if liberal democracy is to have a future in this troubled world, we have to secure it together.

    And what binds us are the lessons from our past — sacred lessons that you described so hauntingly in your letter to our beloved Margot Friedländer. 

    Sir, when you were elected president, you restored Europe’s hope in the transatlantic alliance literally overnight.  And then, only a year later, came Putin’s war. 

    When Putin invaded Ukraine, he didn’t just go after one country.  He attacked the very principles of peace in Europe. 

    Putin thought we would be weak.  He thought we would be divided.  But the opposite was true.  NATO was stronger and more united than ever, and that is, in no small part, Mr. President, thanks to your leadership.

    Mr. President, to have you in our most dangerous moment since the Cold War, to have you and your administration on our side is no less than a historical stroke of good fortune.

    For us here in Europe, the past two years have shown once again, America truly is the indispensable nation.  But it has also shown something else.  NATO is the indispensable alliance. 

    So, in the months to come, I hope that Europeans remember America is indispensable for us, and I hope that Americans remember your allies are indispensable for you. 

    We are more than just other countries in the world.  We are partners.  We are friends. 

    The choice on November the 5th is only Americans’ choice to make.  But we, as Europeans, have a choice too.  We have the choice to do our part, to be unwavering in our support for Ukraine, to invest in our common security, to invest in our shared future, and, as you have done, sir, to stand by the transatlantic alliance no matter what.

    Mr. President, when I visited you in the Oval Office a year ago on October the 6th, just a few hours before Hamas’ brutal attack on Israel, we spoke about the Middle East.  We spoke about Ukraine and Russia.  But at the end — I will never forget that — at the end of our conversation, you went to your desk and handed me a speech of yours not on foreign policy but on the issue that you care most about and that you worry most about — about democracy. 

    I quote, “Democracies don’t have to die at the end of a rifle,” you say in that speech.  “Democracies can die when people are silent, when they are willing to give away that which is most precious to them because they feel frustrated, tired, alienated.”  End of the quote.

    Your words, Mr. President, echoed deeply in our part of the world, and they weigh even more heavily coming from the leader of the world’s oldest and most time-tested democracy. 

    So, let me say this from the bottom of my heart.  In this time when democracy is under strain all around the Western world, you, Mr. President, have been a beacon of democracy. 

    You are a beacon not just by what you have done but by who you are, by the example of your humility, your deep connection with the lives and hopes of hardworking people, and, if you excuse that old-fashioned word, by your decency. 

    Decency is maybe what we are most at risk of losing.  But your decency, sir, is a light that shines very far.  It certainly reached the hearts of my fellow Germans. 

    As U.S. president, you command the most powerful military.  You lead the biggest economy in the world.  But maybe the most precious service to democracy, the most joyful and reassuring thing for people is to know that even this most powerful man in the world is, in the end, a fundamentally decent human being. 

    Mr. President, we all know that you love your Irish poets and that you know them well.  I have heard you quote Seamus Heaney from memory, so I hope you allow me to end with a quote from his “Republic of Conscience.” 

    I quote, “At their inauguration, public leaders must swear to uphold unwritten law and weep to atone for the presumption to hold office.” 

    “The presumption to hold office,” Mr. President.  It seems that you have always had a deep sense of the inevitable presumption in holding office, including the highest office — in being elevated above others, in a society of equals. 

    You have transformed this presumption into a deep sense of responsibility, and you have carried that responsibility throughout your career and have now decided, in the most noble tradition of American leaders since Washington, to let democracy run its ever-changing and uncharted course. 

    Mr. President, on the historic occasion of your visit to Germany, my country recognizes your decades-long dedication to the transatlantic alliance, your outstanding political leadership in Europe’s most dangerous moment, and your lasting moral example of service, sincerity, and decency.

    It is now my great honor to bestow on you the Grand Cross special class of the Order of Merit of the Federal Republic of Germany. 

    And for that, Mr. President — may I say, dear Joe — congratulations.  (Applause.)

    I have to read the document — one second — in German.

    (Speaks German.)  (No translation provided.)  (Applause.)

    (President Biden is presented the Grand Cross special class of the Order of Merit of the Federal Republic of Germany.)  (Applause.)

    It’s done.  (Laughs.)  (Applause.)

    PRESIDENT BIDEN:  Let me begin by saying I — I’m overwhelmed not just by the award but by the words, Mr. President.

    Margot Friedländer, you are a voice of conscience and healing.  I’m actually honored to be in your presence, for real.

    This award means so much to me for what it says about us, the journey we’ve taken; the alliance we’ve strengthened; the way that we have, as two separate nations, risen together to meet our moment.

    I think it’s fair to say, although I know I only look like I’m 40 years old — (laughter) — I — I’ve seen a wide sweep of history.

    When I was born, our countries were at war.  As a young senator, I visited West Berlin and saw what it meant to live in a divided city, country, and continent.  And I forged a bond with Helmut Schmidt, your — my first relationship of candor and trust with a German chancellor but, thankfully, not my last.

    And then, in 1989, like millions of people around the world, I saw 70,000 brave souls gathered in Leipzig, crying — crying out for freedom.  And the Berlin Wall came down 35 years ago this month. 

    It was one of the greatest advances in human dignity in my lifetime.  Some feared the reunification of Germany would revive old hatreds and rivalries.  But leaders of America and Germany dreamed together of a much better future.

    The achievement of a Germany whole and free lives on, exceeding, I think, everyone’s expectations.  The dream of Europe whole and free remains the work of our time, nor is that work more urgent than a pushing back against Putin’s vicious attack against Ukraine.

    German leaders had the wisdom to recognize a turning point in history, an assault on a fellow democracy, and also on principles that upheld 75 years of peace and security in Europe.

    Germany and the United States stood together to support the brave people of Ukraine in their fight for freedom, for democracy, for their very survival.  And I want to thank every leader across Germany’s government who has worked tirelessly to ensure that Ukraine prevails and Putin fails, and NATO remains strong and more united than ever.

    We head into a very difficult winter — (coughs) — but we cannot let up.  We cannot — (an aide delivers a glass of water) — thank you so very much.  That’s kind of you.  (Laughs.)

    We head to a dery — a very difficult winter.  But we cannot let up.  We must sustain our support.  In my view, we must keep going until Ukraine wins a just and durable peace consistent with the U.N. Charter, until once again human dignity prevails.

    Let me close with this.  The times I have lived through have taught me that history does move forward and things can get better if we determine they must — that things can get better and that we should never underestimate the power of democracy, never underes- — -estimate the value of alliances.

    Germany — Germany has taught us all that change is possible and, for better or for worse, countries can and do choose their own destinies and the choices that leaders make at critical times truly matters.

    I want to thank the current leaders of Germany for the choice you’ve made when it matters most.

    I hope you’ll forgive this once, but — if I forsake the great German poets and quote an Irish poet.  (Laughter.) 

    Seamus Heaney said in “The Cure at Troy” — he said, “History teaches us not to hope on this side of the grave.  But then — but then, once in a lifetime, a longed-for tidal wave of justice can rise up, and hope and history rhyme.”

    When the Berlin Wall fell, hope and history rhymed.  When Kyiv stood, hope and history rhymed.

    Many Americans and Germans always find the wisdom and the courage.  May they keep making hope and history rhyme, because we can, because nothing is beyond our capacity, in my view — nothing is beyond our capacity — when we do it together.

    So, thank you again for this award.  I’m honored to accept.  I do not deserve, but I’m honored to accept.  And that, if we continue to work together, Germany has stood up in a way that is incredible.

    I want to thank you again for the award.  And may God bless you all.  And may God protect our troops.

    Thank you so very much.  (Applause.)

    11:31 A.M CEST

    MIL OSI USA News –

    January 24, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Russia: Financial news: Two deposit auctions of JSC “KAVKAZ.RF” will be held on 21.10.2024

    MILES AXLE Translation. Region: Russian Federation –

    Source: Moscow Exchange – Moscow Exchange –

    Parameters;

    The date of the deposit auction is 21.10.2024. The placement currency is RUB. The maximum amount of funds placed (in the placement currency) is 180,000,000.00. The placement period, days is 20. The date of depositing funds is 22.10.2024. The date of return of funds is 11.11.2024. The minimum placement interest rate, % per annum is 19.50. Terms of the conclusion, urgent or special (Urgent). The minimum amount of funds placed for one application (in the placement currency) is 180,000,000.00. The maximum number of applications from one Participant, pcs. 1. Auction form, open or closed (Open). The basis of the Agreement is the General Agreement. Schedule (Moscow time). Applications in preliminary mode from 10:30 to 10:40. Applications in competition mode from 10:40 to 10:45. Setting the cut-off percentage or declaring the auction invalid before 10:55.

    Additional terms

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    Please note; This information is raw content directly from the information source. It is accurate to what the source is stating and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    https://www.moex.com/n74126

    MIL OSI Russia News –

    January 24, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Russia: Financial news: 10/18/2024, 14-58 the values of the lower limit of the repo price corridor, the carry rate and the range of interest rate risk assessment for the ALRS (ALROSA ao) security were changed.

    MILES AXLE Translation. Region: Russian Federation –

    Source: Moscow Exchange – Moscow Exchange –

    10/18/2024

    14:58

    In accordance with the Methodology for determining the risk parameters of the stock market and deposit market of Moscow Exchange PJSC by NCO NCC (JSC), on 18.10.2024, 14-58 (Moscow time), the values of the lower limit of the repo price corridor with the settlement code Y0/Y1Dt (up to -45.33%), the transfer rate and the range of interest rate risk assessment (up to -0.23 rubles, equivalent to a rate of 70.77%) of the ALRS security (ALROSA ao) were changed.

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    Please note; This information is raw content directly from the information source. It is accurate to what the source is stating and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    https://www.moex.com/n74115

    MIL OSI Russia News –

    January 24, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Nations: Statement attributable to the Spokesperson for the Secretary-General on the report of the Eminent Person, Mohamed Chande Othman, concerning the investigation into the conditions and circumstances resulting in the tragic death of Dag Hammarskjöld

    Source: United Nations secretary general

    The Secretary-General has transmitted to the President of the General Assembly the report of the Eminent Person, former Chief Justice of Tanzania, Mr. Mohamed Chande Othman, concerning the investigation into the conditions and circumstances resulting in the tragic death of Dag Hammarskjöld and of the members of the party accompanying him. The Secretary-General’s letter to the President of the General Assembly is accompanied by the Eminent Person’s report and will be publicly available as General Assembly document A/78/1006.

    Dag Hammarskjöld served as Secretary-General from April 1953 until his death in a plane crash in Ndola, Northern Rhodesia, now Zambia, along with 15 others, UN staff members and crew, on the night of 17/18 September 1961. The Secretary-General pays tribute to all those that died and emphasizes that their families deserve answers.

    The Secretary-General is grateful to Judge Othman for his unwavering commitment to this matter and is encouraged that the body of relevant knowledge has grown with each successive mandate of the Eminent Person. He notes that significant new information has been provided to the Eminent Person during his present mandate, including in the areas of: (i) probable intercepts by Member States of relevant communications; (ii) the capacity of the armed forces of Katanga, or others, to have conducted a possible attack on flight SE-BDY; (iii) the presence in the area of foreign paramilitary and intelligence personnel; and (iv) further new information relevant to the context and surrounding events of 1961.

    At this juncture, the Eminent Person assesses it to remain plausible that an external attack or threat was a cause of the crash. The Eminent Person notes that the alternative hypotheses that appear to remain available are that the crash resulted from sabotage, or unintentional human error.

    The Secretary-General is encouraged by the disclosure of new information by some Member States and by some key Member States’ continued commitment to engage with the Eminent Person. He is also grateful for the cooperation and collaboration by Independent Appointees of Member States as well as individual researchers.

    The Secretary-General notes that the Eminent Person considers that it is almost certain that specific, crucial and to date undisclosed information exists in the archives of Member States. The Secretary-General further notes the Eminent Person’s assessment that he has not received, to date, specific responses to his specific queries from certain Member States. The Secretary-General has personally followed up on the Eminent Person’s outstanding requests for information, and calls upon Member States to release any relevant records in their possession.

    With significant progress having been made, the Secretary-General calls on all of us to renew our resolve and commitment to pursue the full truth of what happened on that fateful night in 1961.
     

    MIL OSI United Nations News –

    January 24, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Russia: Financial news: 10/18/2024, 13-23, the values of the lower limit of the repo price corridor, the carry rate and the range of interest rate risk assessment for the ALRS (ALROSA ao) security were changed.

    MILES AXLE Translation. Region: Russian Federation –

    Source: Moscow Exchange – Moscow Exchange –

    10/18/2024

    13:23

    In accordance with the Methodology for determining the risk parameters of the stock market and deposit market of Moscow Exchange PJSC by NCO NCC (JSC), on 18.10.2024, 13-23 (Moscow time), the values of the lower limit of the repo price corridor with the settlement code Y0/Y1Dt (up to -34.8%), the transfer rate and the range of interest rate risk assessment (up to -0.178 rubles, equivalent to a rate of 59.18%) of the ALRS security (ALROSA ao) were changed.

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    Please note; This information is raw content directly from the information source. It is accurate to what the source is stating and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    https://www.moex.com/n74113

    MIL OSI Russia News –

    January 24, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Security: Acting U.S. Attorney Appoints District Election Officer to Ensure Voting Integrity in West Tennessee

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    Assistant U.S. Attorney Will Crow will field calls from the public regarding allegations of fraud or voting rights abuses

    Memphis, TN – Acting United States Attorney Reagan Fondren announced today that Assistant United States Attorney (AUSA) Will Crow will lead District efforts in connection with the Justice Department’s nationwide Election Day Program for the upcoming November 5, 2024, general election.

    AUSA/DEO Crow has been appointed to serve as the District Election Officer (DEO) for the Western District of Tennessee, and in that capacity is responsible for overseeing the district’s handling of election day complaints of voting rights concerns, threats of violence to election officials or staff, and election fraud, in consultation with Justice Department Headquarters in Washington.

    “Voting is the cornerstone of American democracy,” said Acting United States Attorney Fondren. “We have a duty to ensure that every citizen who chooses to exercise their right to vote can do so without interference or discrimination and that those votes are counted in a fair and free election.”

    Fondren added, “Similarly, election officials and staff must be able to serve without being subject to unlawful threats of violence. Our office and the Department of Justice will always work tirelessly to protect the integrity of the election process.”

    The Department of Justice has an important role in deterring and combatting discrimination and intimidation at the polls, threats of violence directed at election officials and poll workers, and election fraud.  The Department will address these violations wherever they occur. The Department’s longstanding Election Day Program furthers these goals and seeks to ensure public confidence in the electoral process by providing local points of contact within the Department for the public to report possible federal election law violations.

    Federal law protects against such crimes as threatening violence against election officials or staff, intimidating or bribing voters, buying, and selling votes, impersonating voters, altering vote tallies, stuffing ballot boxes, and marking ballots for voters against their wishes or without their input. It also contains special protections for the rights of voters, and provides that they can vote free from interference, including intimidation, and other acts designed to prevent or discourage people from voting or voting for the candidate of their choice. The Voting Rights Act protects the right of voters to mark their own ballot or to be assisted by a person of their choice (where voters need assistance because of disability or inability to read or write in English).

    Acting United States Attorney Fondren said, “Ensuring free and fair elections depends in large part on the assistance of the American electorate.  It is important that those who have specific information about voting rights concerns or election fraud make that information available to the Department of Justice.”

    AUSA/DEO Crow will be on duty while the polls are open to respond to complaints of voting rights concerns and election fraud during the upcoming election and to ensure that such complaints are directed to the appropriate authorities. He can be reached by the public at 901-544-4231. 

    In addition, the FBI will have special agents available in each field office and resident agency throughout the country to receive allegations of election fraud and other election abuses on election day. The Nashville Division of the FBI, which covers the entire state of Tennessee, can be reached by the public at 865-544-0751.

    Anyone with specific information about voting rights concerns or election fraud should make that information available to the Department of Justice Civil Rights Division in Washington, DC by phone at 800-253-3931 or by complaint form at https://civilrights.justice.gov/.

    However, if you witness a crime of violence or intimidation, please call 911 immediately and before contacting federal authorities.  State and local police have primary jurisdiction over polling places and almost always have faster reaction capacity in an emergency.

    MIL Security OSI –

    January 24, 2025
←Previous Page
1 … 5,309 5,310 5,311 5,312 5,313 … 5,912
Next Page→
NewzIntel.com

NewzIntel.com

MIL Open Source Intelligence

  • Blog
  • About
  • FAQs
  • Authors
  • Events
  • Shop
  • Patterns
  • Themes

Twenty Twenty-Five

Designed with WordPress