London, UK, June 27, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Amid growing demand for passive income in the digital asset space, UK-based company LET Mining has officially launched its next-generation cloud mining platform, aiming to make cryptocurrency earnings more accessible, transparent, and environmentally responsible. The company offers users a simplified entry into mining top digital assets like Bitcoin, Dogecoin, Litecoin, and Ethereum — all without the need to purchase or manage physical equipment.
LET Mining enters the market at a time when many investors are seeking lower-risk, infrastructure-free ways to participate in the cryptocurrency economy. With traditional mining becoming increasingly expensive and energy-intensive, cloud-based models offer a scalable, remote solution — particularly when paired with a user-friendly platform and clean energy infrastructure.
According to the company, LET Mining’s entire ecosystem is powered by renewable energy sources, including solar and wind. All contracts are hosted in optimized data centers with 24/7 monitoring and automated daily payout features. The platform is designed to serve both individual users and institutional clients, offering fixed-term contracts with defined daily return rates and transparent pricing.
“Our vision with LET Mining is to strip away the complexity and high cost of traditional mining,” said Lillian Austen, Advertising Manager at LET Mining. “We’ve built a platform that allows users to begin earning crypto in minutes, backed by green energy, real-time tracking, and around-the-clock support.”
LET Mining also offers flexible entry points for users at all levels — including a free starter plan for beginners, as well as advanced options for high-volume investors. Each contract is priced to include all operational costs (electricity, maintenance, hosting), so users don’t need to worry about hidden fees.
The company’s proprietary dashboard provides real-time visibility into earnings, contract performance, and referral rewards. Users are paid daily and can reinvest or withdraw funds at their convenience.
In addition to its core mining features, LET Mining offers a referral program that enables users to earn additional commissions by inviting others to the platform. The program is designed to reward both the referrer and the new user, encouraging growth and long-term engagement.
Getting started with LET Mining is a streamlined process. Users can register on the platform, verify their identity, select a mining plan, and fund their wallet using supported cryptocurrencies such as BTC, ETH, DOGE, LTC, or USDT. Once the contract is activated, mining begins automatically, and users can view their earnings grow in real time.
LET Mining has emphasized that its long-term roadmap includes the integration of DeFi tools, NFT-linked mining contracts for added transparency, and further expansion into regulated jurisdictions.
As passive crypto income continues to gain traction worldwide, LET Mining presents a forward-thinking alternative that aligns with both financial opportunity and environmental responsibility.
About LET Mining LET Mining is a London-based cloud mining platform focused on simplifying and democratizing access to digital asset mining. Through hosted infrastructure powered by renewable energy and a fully managed user dashboard, the company offers secure and scalable mining contracts for Bitcoin, Ethereum, Dogecoin, and other cryptocurrencies — with no hardware or technical expertise required.
Media Contact Lillian Austen Advertising Manager, LET Mining info@letmining.com https://letmining.com
WHO with expertise from the United Nation’s Special Programme in Human Reproduction (HRP), has introduced a new resource aimed at helping developers and health professionals improve the quality of digital tools that provide family planning information. The Toolkit and content repository for digital client-facing platforms: family planning offers a collection of simplified, evidence-based messages that can be used in apps, social media, chatbots, and other digital platforms.
The toolkit is designed to support a wide range of users – from ministries of health and nongovernmental organizations to social media influencers and software developers – who are involved in creating or managing digital content related to contraception and reproductive health. The aim is for this toolkit to be adapted by local implementers who can contextualize the information for local relevance.
Filling gaps in digital health content
Digital platforms are increasingly used to share health information, but the quality of content can vary widely. WHO’s new toolkit responds to concerns about misinformation and inconsistent messaging by offering a centralized, vetted source of family planning content based on its clinical guidelines.
“This toolkit is a practical resource for anyone looking to ensure their digital content aligns with WHO recommendations and a step in addressing misinformation.” said Tigest Tamrat, Scientist at WHO and HRP and one of the project leads. “It’s not a one-size-fits-all solution, but it provides a solid foundation that can be adapted to different contexts.”
This toolkit is a practical resource for anyone looking to ensure their digital content aligns with WHO recommendations and a step in addressing misinformation.
Tigest Tamrat / Scientist at WHO and HRP
What’s inside the toolkit?
The toolkit includes four main components:
health interventions and recommendations – a summary of WHO’s guidance on family planning;
user scenarios – examples of how different users might apply the toolkit in real-world settings;
content repository – a downloadable spreadsheet of simplified messages and myth-busting facts; and
performance metrics – suggested indicators for tracking user engagement and tool effectiveness.
The content is intentionally generic, allowing users to tailor it to local languages, cultural norms, and digital habits.
Practical use cases
The toolkit provides sample scenarios to illustrate how it might be used. For example, a programme manager might use it to update the content of an existing mobile app, while a social media influencer could use it to fact-check posts or respond to common questions from followers.
In one scenario, a fictional influencer named Aisha uses the toolkit to create a video series addressing common myths about contraception. Her content helps viewers like Miriam, a 19-year-old follower, feel more confident in making informed decisions about reproductive health.
Looking ahead: AI integration
While the toolkit currently focuses on scripted content, it could also support more advanced applications. For instance, artificial intelligence tools like chatbots could use the content repository to provide accurate, real-time responses to user questions. The document also highlights the potential of AI to personalize content based on user demographics and preferences.
A flexible resource
Rather than being a prescriptive solution, the toolkit is meant to be a flexible resource that can be adapted to different needs. It encourages collaboration with local experts and communities to ensure content is relevant and respectful.
The flag of the European Union is turning 40 this June. Its 12 gold stars on a blue background are instantly recognisable and synonymous with the European project that unites all Europeans. With time, it has also become a symbol of the EU’s ideals of unity, solidarity, and harmony among the peoples of Europe.
The flag was first used as the flag of the Council of Europe in 1955. Following World War Two, the Council of Europe was looking for a flag that would give Europe a symbol with which its inhabitants could identify. It chose the design which best conveyed neutrality, timelessness, and simplicity.
Contrary to a common misconception, the number 12 does not represent the number of EU countries in our Union but rather are a symbol of perfection and stability, and the circle, a symbol of union. The fixed number means the flag remains unchanged regardless of the European Union’s growth.
In 1983 the European Parliament adopted the flag devised by the Council of Europe and recommended that it become the European Communities’ emblem. The European Council gave its approval in June 1985. The European Communities have now evolved into the European Union, as we know it today.
The iconic flag has become a powerful emblem beyond EU borders, a rallying point for people fighting for their rights. For freedom and democracy, dignity and equality, the rule of law and human rights, peace and security. Some 70 years after it was created, the EU flag not only represents EU ideals, but it has become a symbol of hope.
The flag of the European Union is turning 40 this June. Its 12 gold stars on a blue background are instantly recognisable and synonymous with the European project that unites all Europeans. With time, it has also become a symbol of the EU’s ideals of unity, solidarity, and harmony among the peoples of Europe.
The flag was first used as the flag of the Council of Europe in 1955. Following World War Two, the Council of Europe was looking for a flag that would give Europe a symbol with which its inhabitants could identify. It chose the design which best conveyed neutrality, timelessness, and simplicity.
Contrary to a common misconception, the number 12 does not represent the number of EU countries in our Union but rather are a symbol of perfection and stability, and the circle, a symbol of union. The fixed number means the flag remains unchanged regardless of the European Union’s growth.
In 1983 the European Parliament adopted the flag devised by the Council of Europe and recommended that it become the European Communities’ emblem. The European Council gave its approval in June 1985. The European Communities have now evolved into the European Union, as we know it today.
The iconic flag has become a powerful emblem beyond EU borders, a rallying point for people fighting for their rights. For freedom and democracy, dignity and equality, the rule of law and human rights, peace and security. Some 70 years after it was created, the EU flag not only represents EU ideals, but it has become a symbol of hope.
The flag of the European Union is turning 40 this June. Its 12 gold stars on a blue background are instantly recognisable and synonymous with the European project that unites all Europeans. With time, it has also become a symbol of the EU’s ideals of unity, solidarity, and harmony among the peoples of Europe.
The flag was first used as the flag of the Council of Europe in 1955. Following World War Two, the Council of Europe was looking for a flag that would give Europe a symbol with which its inhabitants could identify. It chose the design which best conveyed neutrality, timelessness, and simplicity.
Contrary to a common misconception, the number 12 does not represent the number of EU countries in our Union but rather are a symbol of perfection and stability, and the circle, a symbol of union. The fixed number means the flag remains unchanged regardless of the European Union’s growth.
In 1983 the European Parliament adopted the flag devised by the Council of Europe and recommended that it become the European Communities’ emblem. The European Council gave its approval in June 1985. The European Communities have now evolved into the European Union, as we know it today.
The iconic flag has become a powerful emblem beyond EU borders, a rallying point for people fighting for their rights. For freedom and democracy, dignity and equality, the rule of law and human rights, peace and security. Some 70 years after it was created, the EU flag not only represents EU ideals, but it has become a symbol of hope.
The European Council is the EU institution that defines the general political direction and priorities of the European Union. It is composed of the heads of state or government of the 27 EU member states, the European Council President and the Commission President.
The European Council is the EU institution that defines the general political direction and priorities of the European Union. It is composed of the heads of state or government of the 27 EU member states, the European Council President and the Commission President.
589th Plenary session, with the following guests: Roberta Metsola, President of the EP (tbc);János Bóka, Minister of EU Affairs of Hungary; Nicolas Schmit, EU Commissioner for Jobs and Social Rights, Maxime Cerutti, Director of Social Affairs at Business Europe, Tea Jarc, Confederal Secretary of the EU Trade Union Confederation (ETUC), Rareș Voicu, President of the EU Youth Forum and Nicoletta Merlo, EESC Member; with Teresa Ribera, Minister for the Ecological Transition and the Demographic Challenge of Spain (tbc), Svenja Schulze, Federal Minister for Economic Cooperation and Development of Germany (tbc); Saadia Zahidi, Managing Director, World Economic Forum
Colonel Marcin Mazur is the Vice-President of the Polish Space Agency (POLSA) – an executive agency of the Ministry of Economic Development and Technology, est. 2014. POLSA supports the Polish space industry, cooperates with international agencies and public administration in the field of exploration and use of Outer Space.
Col Mazur’s goal is to execute the Polish Space Strategy issued in 2017, which is in compliance with both the Space Strategy for Europe 2016 and the NATO Overarching Space Policy 2019, and implement the National Space Programme 2022-2026.
Col Mazur’s responsibility in POLSA is to systematize security and defence activities, in particular the development of dual-use capabilities which may apply for military and civilian applications:
EO – Earth Observation satellite systems;
SATCOM – Satellite Communications systems;
SSA / SST – Space Situational Awareness / Space Surveillance and Tracking;
Launching technologies.
Colonel Mazur was commissioned in 1998 and promoted to his first officer’s rank, 2nd lieutenant, in 2002. He graduated from the Military University of Technology in Warsaw with a Master’s Degree in Topography and Mapping. He started his career as a Geospatial Officer at the 6 th Independent Geographical Unit in Torun where he became the leader of Mobile Geospatial Support Team dedicated for NATO Response Forces. Following that Colonel Mazur served at the Joint Force Command Brunssum, the Netherlands, in the Geospatial Support Section, J2 Intelligence Division and as an IMINT Officer at the Military Geographical Centre in Warsaw from where he was assigned in 2012 to the General Staff of the Polish Armed Forces, P2 Intelligence Division, Imagery Intelligence Branch. As an Intelligence Officer, he was also appointed as a Part-time Inspector for Treaties on Conventional Arms Control in Europe (CFE) and Vienna Document 2011 (VD11) inspections. In August 2017 he became the IMINT Branch Head and in January 2019 was promoted to Colonel rank. As the IMINT Branch Head he was responsible for defining Earth Observation (EO) and Space Situational Awareness (SSA) military requirements. He was the co-chairman of the Polish-Italian Operational Working Group with regards to the COSMO SkyMed (CSK) and OPTSAT-3000 systems. Nationally he served the Chairman role of the Inter-ministerial Earth Observation Task Group.
EDUCATION
2003 Master of Science in Topography and Mapping, Military University of Technology, Warsaw
2013 Military Intelligence Officer Course, Regional Joint Intelligence Training Facility, US European Command / US Africa Command, Warsaw
2016 Postgraduate Studies, GIS, Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing for Defence and Security Purposes, Military University of Technology, Warsaw
ASSIGNMENTS
1998 – 2003 Officer Cadet, Military University of Technology, Warsaw
2003 – 2008 Geospatial Officer, 6th Independent Geographical Unit, Torun
2008 – 2010 Geospatial Officer, Joint Force Command Brunssum, the Netherlands
2010 – 2012 Imagery Intelligence Officer, Military Geographical Centre, Warsaw
2012 – 2017 Imagery Intelligence Officer, P2 Intelligence Division, General Staff of the Polish Armed Forces, Warsaw
2017 – 2021 Imagery Intelligence Branch Head, P2 Intelligence Division, General Staff of the Polish Armed Forces, Warsaw
2021 – Vice-President, Polish Space Agency, Warsaw
West Indies head coach Daren Sammy has voiced concerns over the performance of TV umpire Adrian Holdstock during the first Test against Australia in Barbados, following a series of contentious review decisions on Day 2, according to ESPNcricinfo.
Sammy reportedly met with match referee Javagal Srinath after the day’s play to seek clarification regarding multiple decisions that did not go in the West Indies’ favour. He also expressed his concerns about Holdstock’s officiating during the recent ODI series in England, where the South African umpire served as the TV umpire in two games and stood on the field in another.
Two key moments on the second day left the West Indies camp frustrated. The first was the dismissal of captain Roston Chase, adjudged LBW to Pat Cummins, despite what West Indies believed was clear evidence of an inside edge. The second was the wicket of Shai Hope, who was caught behind by Alex Carey off Beau Webster. The catch was deemed clean after a review by the third umpire.
“We are just trying to find some sort of understanding as to what the process is,” Sammy said, as quoted by ESPNcricinfo.
“We only hope for consistency. That’s all we could ask for. When there is doubt in something, just be consistent across the board,” he added.
“I have noticed, especially with this particular umpire, it’s something that for me started in England. It’s frustrating. I just ask for consistency in decision-making,” he noted.
“Yeah, look, you don’t want to get yourself in a situation where you’re wondering about certain umpires. Is there something against this team? But when you see decision after decision, then it raises the question. I know he’s here for the series. You don’t want to go into a Test match having that doubt,” Sammy said.
“So I want to have that conversation as to the process… so we could all be clear. Because, at the end of the day, you don’t want to be going into a Test match not trusting the umpires. And that’s not what our team is about. We’re just looking for some clarity regarding the decisions,” he explained.
Asked whether the West Indies would lodge a formal complaint, Sammy replied, “You’ll have to wait and see for that.”
Speaking on Chase’s dismissal, which came just after lunch and broke a 67-run partnership with Hope, Sammy said, “In our opinion, we saw the ball deviated onto the pad.”
While Sammy didn’t explicitly dispute the decision on Hope’s dismissal, he referenced a similar incident from the previous day, when a catch taken by Hope to dismiss Travis Head was ruled not to have carried.
“I’m just saying, judge what you see,” Sammy said.
“If you see the same thing and one is not out, there is even more doubt on the other one than you give out. Again, I don’t know what he’s seen, but from the images we’ve seen, the decisions are not fair enough for both teams. We’re all human. Mistakes will be made. I just want fairness,” he added.
Australia also had their share of discontent. In the first over of Day 2, they reviewed an LBW call against Chase, convinced the ball had struck the pad first. While initial replays seemed to support their claim, Holdstock judged there was insufficient evidence to overturn the on-field decision. Fast bowler Mitchell Starc later questioned whether the visuals and audio in the replays were correctly synced.
“There’s been some interesting ones,” Starc said, as quoted by ESPNcricinfo.
“Obviously, a couple more have gone against the West Indies than us. One for us (against Chase) looked like there was a gap between the bat and the ball—it cost us 40-odd runs, but then a contentious one to then get the wicket,” he added.
“As players, you can only ask a question. We don’t use the technology to make that decision. It sort of felt like, or looked like, the Snicko and the images were out of sync to some capacity,” he noted.
Starc also maintained that Head’s edge to Hope on the opening day looked out to them.
Sammy, mindful of the protocols surrounding criticism of officials, revealed that he had instructed his players not to comment publicly on the decisions after the game.
“We know the rules. We know fines go all across the board,” he said.
“I don’t want them to focus on that. Yes, we’re kind of shooting ourselves in the foot by dropping so many catches, but look at the Test match—[it’s] us against ourselves, some of these decisions—and we’re still in a position to win,” he concluded.
West Indies head coach Daren Sammy has voiced concerns over the performance of TV umpire Adrian Holdstock during the first Test against Australia in Barbados, following a series of contentious review decisions on Day 2, according to ESPNcricinfo.
Sammy reportedly met with match referee Javagal Srinath after the day’s play to seek clarification regarding multiple decisions that did not go in the West Indies’ favour. He also expressed his concerns about Holdstock’s officiating during the recent ODI series in England, where the South African umpire served as the TV umpire in two games and stood on the field in another.
Two key moments on the second day left the West Indies camp frustrated. The first was the dismissal of captain Roston Chase, adjudged LBW to Pat Cummins, despite what West Indies believed was clear evidence of an inside edge. The second was the wicket of Shai Hope, who was caught behind by Alex Carey off Beau Webster. The catch was deemed clean after a review by the third umpire.
“We are just trying to find some sort of understanding as to what the process is,” Sammy said, as quoted by ESPNcricinfo.
“We only hope for consistency. That’s all we could ask for. When there is doubt in something, just be consistent across the board,” he added.
“I have noticed, especially with this particular umpire, it’s something that for me started in England. It’s frustrating. I just ask for consistency in decision-making,” he noted.
“Yeah, look, you don’t want to get yourself in a situation where you’re wondering about certain umpires. Is there something against this team? But when you see decision after decision, then it raises the question. I know he’s here for the series. You don’t want to go into a Test match having that doubt,” Sammy said.
“So I want to have that conversation as to the process… so we could all be clear. Because, at the end of the day, you don’t want to be going into a Test match not trusting the umpires. And that’s not what our team is about. We’re just looking for some clarity regarding the decisions,” he explained.
Asked whether the West Indies would lodge a formal complaint, Sammy replied, “You’ll have to wait and see for that.”
Speaking on Chase’s dismissal, which came just after lunch and broke a 67-run partnership with Hope, Sammy said, “In our opinion, we saw the ball deviated onto the pad.”
While Sammy didn’t explicitly dispute the decision on Hope’s dismissal, he referenced a similar incident from the previous day, when a catch taken by Hope to dismiss Travis Head was ruled not to have carried.
“I’m just saying, judge what you see,” Sammy said.
“If you see the same thing and one is not out, there is even more doubt on the other one than you give out. Again, I don’t know what he’s seen, but from the images we’ve seen, the decisions are not fair enough for both teams. We’re all human. Mistakes will be made. I just want fairness,” he added.
Australia also had their share of discontent. In the first over of Day 2, they reviewed an LBW call against Chase, convinced the ball had struck the pad first. While initial replays seemed to support their claim, Holdstock judged there was insufficient evidence to overturn the on-field decision. Fast bowler Mitchell Starc later questioned whether the visuals and audio in the replays were correctly synced.
“There’s been some interesting ones,” Starc said, as quoted by ESPNcricinfo.
“Obviously, a couple more have gone against the West Indies than us. One for us (against Chase) looked like there was a gap between the bat and the ball—it cost us 40-odd runs, but then a contentious one to then get the wicket,” he added.
“As players, you can only ask a question. We don’t use the technology to make that decision. It sort of felt like, or looked like, the Snicko and the images were out of sync to some capacity,” he noted.
Starc also maintained that Head’s edge to Hope on the opening day looked out to them.
Sammy, mindful of the protocols surrounding criticism of officials, revealed that he had instructed his players not to comment publicly on the decisions after the game.
“We know the rules. We know fines go all across the board,” he said.
“I don’t want them to focus on that. Yes, we’re kind of shooting ourselves in the foot by dropping so many catches, but look at the Test match—[it’s] us against ourselves, some of these decisions—and we’re still in a position to win,” he concluded.
Source: Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe – OSCE
Headline: OSCE expands focus on virtual assets taxation in second workshop in Moldova
Building on insights from the first workshop held in May, the OSCE organized a follow-up event on the taxation of virtual assets on 26 and 27 June in Chisinau, Moldova.
The workshop brought together eighteen representatives from Moldova’s State Tax Service and the Ministry of Finance to enhance their understanding of the complex and evolving landscape of crypto taxation.
Over the course of the workshop, participants engaged in a mix of theoretical sessions and practical exercises aimed at deepening their technical knowledge and increasing their operational capacity. The workshop covered a range of topics, including blockchain-based taxation mechanisms, common tax avoidance strategies involving cryptocurrencies, and compliance with international standards.
This training comes at a critical time, as Moldovan authorities are actively working to enhance the anti-money laundering framework and develop clear regulatory guidance for the virtual asset sector.
The workshop series was organized as part of the OSCE’s extra-budgetary project, “Innovative Policy Solutions to Mitigate Money-Laundering Risks of Virtual Assets”, implemented by the Office of the Co-ordinator of OSCE Economic and Environmental Activities and funded by Germany, Italy, Poland, Romania, the United Kingdom and the United States.
The European Political Community is a platform for political coordination among the European countries. It aims to foster political dialogue and cooperation to address issues of common interest, and to strengthen the security, stability and prosperity of the European continent.
Chaired by the CoR’s President, the main purpose of the plenary sessions is to:
vote on opinions, reports and resolutions
adopt the CoR’s political programme at the beginning of each term
elect a President, First Vice-president and the remaining members of the Bureau
set up policy commissions within the institution
approve the CoR’s draft estimates for expenditure and revenue
revise and agree on the CoR’s Rules of Procedure.
The relevant CoR commission will appoint one of its members – known as the rapporteur – to draft an opinion on the legislative proposal which is then voted on during one of the CoR plenaries. If the opinion receives a majority of votes in its favour (simple majority), it is adopted and handed over to the other EU institutions for further scrutiny.
The CoR may also proactively adopt a position on a particular issue through an own-initiative opinion.
If you would like to follow a plenary session in person you can apply for an observer badge by registering through the observer registration form at least 5 days before the start of the given plenary.
VICTORIA, Seychelles, June 27, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Bitget, the leading cryptocurrency exchange and Web3 company, is now the most liquid platform for altcoins within the 0.3–0.5% price interval, as per reports released by CoinGecko analyzing centralized exchange (CEX) liquidity across key digital assets. This finding comes from a comparative study of order book depth across major trading venues including Binance, Bybit, OKX, Kraken, and Coinbase.
The report, titled “2025 State of Crypto Liquidity on CEXes,” examined order book snapshots and deviation spreads for top-traded tokens such as BTC, ETH, XRP, SOL, and DOGE. It measured liquidity within various price intervals from the mid-market rate, providing a granular view of the actual executable volume for traders. While Binance retained the largest depth for Bitcoin, Bitget outperformed all other platforms in terms of liquidity provisioning for non-BTC assets in the mid-depth trading band.
The analysis highlighted that Bitget consistently maintained superior liquidity for altcoins—particularly within the 0.3% to 0.5% spread from market price—suggesting a favorable trading environment for investors seeking tighter spreads and reduced slippage outside of Bitcoin-heavy strategies. This result positions Bitget as the preferred platform for altcoin traders, as tighter spreads often signal healthier market participation and reduced execution costs.
“Altcoin liquidity is a measurement for market depth, and this ranking shows how far Bitget has come. Today, institutions drive 80% of our spot volume, futures activity from professional firms has doubled, and 80% of top quant funds trade on Bitget. Liquidity is infrastructure — and we’re building it where the market needs it most,” said Gracy Chen, CEO at Bitget.
CoinGecko’s liquidity evaluation focused not just on headline volumes but on actual order book thickness and slippage tolerance at different price bands, making it a more accurate reflection of trading experience. Bitget’s strong presence in these middle bands shows its capacity to sustain meaningful trading depth beyond high-cap assets, which remains a challenge for many centralized platforms.
In an increasingly fragmented liquidity landscape, the report suggests that Bitget’s performance could be attributed to active market-making infrastructure, listing strategy, and strong retail and institutional participation in the altcoin segment. The findings are particularly relevant as trading costs and depth disparities remain a priority for professional traders and funds operating across multiple venues.
Established in 2018, Bitget is the world’s leading cryptocurrency exchange and Web3 company. Serving over 120 million users in 150+ countries and regions, the Bitget exchange is committed to helping users trade smarter with its pioneering copy trading feature and other trading solutions, while offering real-time access to Bitcoin price, Ethereum price, and other cryptocurrency prices. Formerly known as BitKeep, Bitget Wallet is a world-class multi-chain crypto wallet that offers an array of comprehensive Web3 solutions and features including wallet functionality, token swap, NFT Marketplace, DApp browser, and more.
Bitget is at the forefront of driving crypto adoption through strategic partnerships, such as its role as the Official Crypto Partner of the World’s Top Football League, LALIGA, in EASTERN, SEA and LATAM markets, as well as a global partner of Turkish National athletes Buse Tosun Çavuşoğlu (Wrestling world champion), Samet Gümüş (Boxing gold medalist) and İlkin Aydın (Volleyball national team), to inspire the global community to embrace the future of cryptocurrency.
Risk Warning:Digital asset prices are subject to fluctuation and may experience significant volatility. Investors are advised to only allocate funds they can afford to lose. The value of any investment may be impacted, and there is a possibility that financial objectives may not be met, nor the principal investment recovered. Independent financial advice should always be sought, and personal financial experience and standing carefully considered. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. Bitget accepts no liability for any potential losses incurred. Nothing contained herein should be construed as financial advice. For further information, please refer to ourTerms of Use.
Source: The Conversation – Africa – By Danny Bradlow, Professor/Senior Research Fellow, Centre for Advancement of Scholarship, University of Pretoria
Ghana and Zambia’s official creditors are pressing them to default on loans to two African multilateral financial institutions: the African Export-Import Bank (Afreximbank) and the Trade and Development Bank (TDB).
These creditors, in effect, are demanding that the two countries prioritise repayments to themselves over payments to these two banks.
As academics who have worked on the challenges of financing sustainable development in Africa, we believe this action is short-sighted.
The action by Ghana and Zambia’s official creditors has two significant implications.
First, they are demanding that the two countries treat Afreximbank and the Trade and Development Bank as commercial creditors. This would undermine the banks’ credit ratings and increase their borrowing costs. It would also reduce their capacity to finance sustainable development in Africa.
Second, pressing Ghana and Zambia to default, rather than supporting pragmatic restructuring aligned with their strong growth prospects, exacerbates Ghana and Zambia’s financial vulnerability. Either they would have to use scarce resources to pay these debts or default on their obligations, in which case, the banks might well sue them.
Quotes from Ghana and Zambia’s ministries of finance suggest the decision to default is their own. However, they faced intense pressure from their official creditors to treat the two African multilateral financial institutions differently from all their other multilateral creditors.
Why does this differential treatment matter?
Preferred creditor status
Multilateral financial institutions, including the World Bank and African Development Bank, have a preferred creditor status. This is in recognition of the special role they play. They are expected to provide relatively low-cost funding for public investment, economic stability and long-term sustainable development in low- and middle-income countries.
Their preferred creditor status ensures that, when countries experience debt distress, their development mandate is prioritised over the concerns of commercial creditors. Commercial creditors normally only fund commercially viable transactions. They charge high interest rates to compensate for the risk of default on these transactions.
Both Afreximbank and Trade and Development Bank were created to fill a gap in Africa’s access to critical development finance. They provide financing for projects and transactions that commercial institutions and other multilateral financial institutions cannot – or will not – provide, because of capital limits, regulations or perceptions of risk.
the decline in African exports has impacted adversely on the economies of African states and hindered their ability to achieve a self-reliant development.
It further recognises that stimulating economic development
can best be achieved through the creation of a trade financing international institution whose principal purpose is to provide and mobilise the requisite financial resources.
Historically, it has enjoyed preferred creditor status to support its role in meeting this purpose.
Why preferred creditor status is being challenged
The two countries’ official creditor committees, the rating agency Fitch and other commentators are challenging the preferred creditor status of the two African institutions. They argue that the two banks are different from multilateral financial institutions like the World Bank and the African Development Bank that only have states as shareholders. They suggest that the private shareholders in the two African banks should not benefit from preferred creditor status. Instead, they should receive the same status as commercial creditors.
This view ignores the reason that Afreximbank’s and the Trade and Development Bank’s member states authorised them to have private shareholders. It was a deliberate, pragmatic measure designed to fill a gap in Africa’s access to affordable development finance.
The idea was to create new multilateral institutions that could raise capital flexibly and quickly on terms that the individual African states could not match on their own. Several other regional development banks have this hybrid model, including CAF, a highly rated development bank in Latin America.
It is perverse that this creative and pragmatic approach to filling a gap in the global financial system is now being used against the two African banks.
The consequences
The cost of capital for the two African financial institutions will increase if they are treated like commercial creditors. This will reduce their capacity to lend and their financing will become more expensive. It will also deepen inequality in the global financial system. Lastly, it will increase the risk of future African sovereign debt defaults.
In other words, downgrading their status risks undermining the very stability that official creditors claim to safeguard. It will also create another obstacle to Africa’s efforts to access stable, predictable and affordable flows of development finance.
The eventual outcome of the official creditors’ action will ultimately depend on negotiations between Ghana and Zambia and their creditors. This will include the two African institutions. It will also be influenced by how these different groups of creditors behave in other African sovereign debt restructurings.
However, the international community can seek to influence the outcome by taking actions in appropriate international settings.
Global leaders are searching for ways to scale up and strengthen the capacity of regional and subregional development banks like Afreximbank and the Trade and Development Bank. This requires respecting their preferred creditor status and increasing their access to affordable capital.
This is precisely the opposite of what is unfolding.
There is still time for the creditor governments to change course by demonstrating their support for African multilateral financial institutions.
– Africa’s development banks are being undermined: the continent will pay the price – https://theconversation.com/africas-development-banks-are-being-undermined-the-continent-will-pay-the-price-259404
Russia advocates for multilateralism and stronger UN at G20 Sherpa meeting
Russia’s G20 Sherpa, Svetlana Lukash, has highlighted the importance of multilateralism for ensuring global stability and sustainability, calling for ongoing dialogue and the strengthening of the United Nations.
“Multilateralism is the only thing that can keep the world together today and save us from collapse, save the economy from complete fragmentation, and ensure global growth and sustainability,” she said.
Despite the current challenges of economic fragmentation and geopolitical tensions, Lukash said she remained optimistic.
“We must continue dialogue, no matter what divisions exist in our minds and policies.“
Lukash was speaking on the sidelines of the G20 Sherpa meeting on Thursday, where the world’s largest economies and organisations are convening at Sun City Resort in the North West.
Lukash is the Deputy Head of the Presidential Expert Directorate within the Presidential Executive Office of Russia.
“I think the G20 is very well placed to keep multilateralism as a flag for all humanity. But indeed, what we always keep in mind is that we have the United Nations, and that is the main platform that we need to cherish and need to strengthen.“
She also cast the spotlight on South Africa’s groundbreaking G20 Presidency as a pivotal moment for inclusive international dialogue.
Lukash believes that the strategic vision of multilateralism extends beyond traditional diplomatic frameworks.
By inviting diverse stakeholders and opening dialogue with African neighbours and Global South representatives, Lukash said South Africa aims to create a more representative international platform.
“I think just having the Presidency in Africa for the first time and putting the interests of Africa and of the Global South on the top of the G20 agenda already gives the strongest signal to the world community that the time has changed.”
She is of the view that the G20 should not be a closed forum where only 20 economies discuss issues that matter to the entire world.
“What South Africa’s Presidency did is help open the G20 in the interests of the global majority. That is amazing. So, I really praise what the Presidency is doing this year.”
The Sherpa said the G20 Leaders’ Summit in November represents a critical opportunity to demonstrate how multilateral approaches can address complex global economic challenges.
Lukash also recognised the ongoing geoeconomic fragmentation and geopolitical tensions, which include sanctions and tariff wars.
However, she believes that the key multilateral priorities should focus on reforming global institutions such as the World Trade Organisation (WTO), addressing geopolitical tensions, and developing more inclusive mechanisms for economic cooperation.
Despite geoeconomic fragmentation and tensions, Lukash said Russia sees the G20 as crucial for global economic cooperation, particularly in trade, energy, and finance.
She told journalists that Russia’s key priorities for the G20 agenda align with South Africa’s goals, focusing on inclusive global growth, job creation, artificial intelligence governance, and critical minerals.
The Sherpa also praised the bilateral relations between South Africa and Russia, particularly in economic cooperation and investments, and expressed full support for South Africa’s G20 priorities.
She said she was also grateful that South Africa’s Deputy President Paul Mashatile recently attended the St Petersburg International Economic Forum during his working visit to Russia.
“We, as Russia, tried to ensure that he spent that time very productively, ensured a lot of discussions with all the government of the Russian Federation, aimed at increasing our cooperation and strengthening bilateral relations by ensuring investments and common economic cooperation between all countries.
“[The Deputy President] very rightly points out the main issues that the investments need to be shifted to the countries of the Global South, and that’s what our President and the Deputy President discussed.”
Lukash has assured the South African government that Russia will support them “completely” in all their priorities and goals.
“We will do our best to make your G20 Leaders’ Summit a success.” – SAnews.gov.za
A former attorney has been convicted on four counts of theft by the Mpumalanga Specialised Commercial Crimes Court after defrauding clients of their Road Accident Fund (RAF) claims.
According to the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA), Mantladi Jo-Anne Mmela, committed the crimes when she was practising as a sole practitioner between June 2019 and March 2022.
“The accused lodged claims against the Road Accident Fund on behalf of her clients, which were subsequently paid out. The money was paid by the Road Accident Fund into the trust account of Mmela Incorporated Attorneys for the benefit of her clients, totalling an amount of over R4.1 million.
“The incident came to light after one of the victims reported that Mmela failed to pay her. An investigation ensued and led to the arrest of the accused in 2022,” the NPA said in a statement.
Mmela was subsequently granted bail. However, after absconding, she was re-arrested and remained in custody.
“During trial, the accused pleaded not guilty, and Senior State Advocate Henry Nxumalo presented evidence of the witnesses to prove the allegations levelled against her. The accused was convicted on four counts of theft, and the matter was postponed to 21 August 2025 for sentencing in the same court.
“The National Prosecuting Authority welcomes the conviction as a significant step in the fight against the theft of trust monies by attorneys as breach of trust, more so the victims of motor vehicle accidents. The collaboration against fighting such crimes yielded positive results in this matter.
“The NPA remains committed to fighting financial crimes and ensuring that those who deprive claimants of their monies are prosecuted,” the NPA said. – SAnews.gov.za
In just four days, one-third of the population of Tuvalu entered a ballot for a new permanent visa to Australia.
This world-first visa will enable up to 280 Tuvaluans to move permanently to Australia each year, from a current population of about 10,000. The visa is open to anyone who wants to work, study or live in Australia. Unlike other visa schemes for Pacific peoples, a job offer in Australia is not required.
While the visa itself doesn’t mention climate change, the treaty that created it is framed in the context of the “existential threat posed by climate change”. That’s why when it was announced, I described it as the world’s first bilateral agreement on climate mobility.
The Australian government, too, has called it “the first agreement of its kind anywhere in the world, providing a pathway for mobility with dignity as climate impacts worsen”.
The high number of ballot applications may come as a surprise to many, especially given there were multiple concerns within Tuvalu when the treaty was first announced. Even so, some analysts predicted all Tuvaluans would apply eventually, to keep their options open.
The visa highlights the importance of creating opportunities for people to move in the context of climate change and disasters. The dangers of rising sea levels are clearly apparent, including coastal flooding, storm damage and water supplies. But there is a lot more at play here.
For many, especially young families, this will be seen as a chance for education and skills training in Australia. Giving people choices about if, when and where they move is empowering and enables them to make informed decisions about their own lives.
For the government of Tuvalu, the new visa is also about shoring up the economy. Migration is now a structural component of many Pacific countries’ economies.
The money migrants send back to their home countries to support their families and communities is known as remittances. In 2023, remittances comprised 28% of GDP in Samoa and nearly 42% of GDP in Tonga – the highest in the world. Currently, Tuvalu sits at 3.2%.
A long time coming
Well before climate change became an issue of concern, Tuvalu had been lobbying Australia for special visa pathways. Demographic pressures, combined with limited livelihood and educational opportunities, made it a live policy issue throughout the 1980s and ‘90s. In 1984, a review of Australia’s foreign aid program suggested improved migration opportunities for Tuvaluans may be the most useful form of assistance.
By the early 2000s, the focus had shifted to the existential threats posed by climate change. In 2006, as then-shadow environment minister, Anthony Albanese released a policy discussion paper called Our Drowning Neighbours. It proposed that Australia create Pacific migration pathways as part of a neighbourly response. In 2009, a spokesperson for Penny Wong, then minister for climate change, stated permanent migration might eventually be the only option for some Pacific peoples.
When combined with other Pacific pathways to Australia and New Zealand, nearly 4% of the population could migrate each year. This is “an extraordinarily high level”, according to one expert. Within a decade, close to 40% of the population could have moved – although some people may return home or go backwards and forwards.
How will the new arrivals be received?
The real test of the new visa’s success will be how people are treated when they arrive in Australia.
Will they be helped to adjust to life here, or will they feel isolated and shut out? Will they be able to find work and training, or will they find themselves in insecure and uncertain circumstances? Will they feel a loss of cultural connection, or will they be able to maintain cultural traditions within the growing Tuvaluan diaspora?
Ensuring sound and culturally appropriate settlement services are in place will be crucial. These would ideally be co-developed with members of the Tuvaluan community, to “centralise Tuvaluan culture and values, in order to ensure ongoing dialogue and trust”.
It has been suggested by experts that a “liaison officer with Tuvaluan cultural expertise and language skills could assist in facilitating activities such as post-arrival programs”, for instance.
Learning from experience
There are also many important lessons to be learned from the migration of Tuvaluans to New Zealand, to reduce the risk of newcomers experiencing economic and social hardship.
Ongoing monitoring and refinement of the scheme will also be key. It should involve the Tuvaluan diaspora, communities back in Tuvalu, service providers in Australia, as well as federal, state/territory and local governments.
By freeing up resources and alleviating stress on what is already a fragile atoll environment, migration may enable some people to remain in Tuvalu for longer, supported by remittances and extended family networks abroad.
As some experts have suggested, money sent home from overseas could be used to make families less vulnerable to climate change. It might help them buy rainwater tanks or small boats, or improve internet and other communications. Remittances are also beneficial when they are invested in services that lift the level of education of children or boost social capital.
Australia is offering ‘climate visas’ to 280 residents of Tuvalu (10 News First)
Delaying a mass exodus
It is difficult to know when a tipping point might be reached. For instance, some have warned that if too few people remain in Tuvalu, this could constrain development by limiting the availability of labour and skills. A former president of Kiribati, Teburoro Tito, once told me migration was “a double-edged sword”. While it could help people secure employment overseas and remit money, “the local economy, the local setup, also has to have enough skilled people” – otherwise it’s counterproductive.
With visas capped at 280 a year – and scope to adjust the numbers if concerns arise – we are still a long way from that point. Right now, the new visa provides a safety net to ensure people have choices about how they respond to climate change. With the visa ballot open until July 18, many more people may yet apply.
Jane McAdam receives funding from the Australian Research Council (ARC) and is the Director of the ARC Evacuations Research Hub at the Kaldor Centre for International Refugee Law, UNSW Sydney.
Source: The Conversation – Africa – By Danny Bradlow, Professor/Senior Research Fellow, Centre for Advancement of Scholarship, University of Pretoria
Ghana and Zambia’s official creditors are pressing them to default on loans to two African multilateral financial institutions: the African Export-Import Bank (Afreximbank) and the Trade and Development Bank (TDB).
These creditors, in effect, are demanding that the two countries prioritise repayments to themselves over payments to these two banks.
As academics who have worked on the challenges of financing sustainable development in Africa, we believe this action is short-sighted.
The action by Ghana and Zambia’s official creditors has two significant implications.
First, they are demanding that the two countries treat Afreximbank and the Trade and Development Bank as commercial creditors. This would undermine the banks’ credit ratings and increase their borrowing costs. It would also reduce their capacity to finance sustainable development in Africa.
Second, pressing Ghana and Zambia to default, rather than supporting pragmatic restructuring aligned with their strong growth prospects, exacerbates Ghana and Zambia’s financial vulnerability. Either they would have to use scarce resources to pay these debts or default on their obligations, in which case, the banks might well sue them.
Quotes from Ghana and Zambia’s ministries of finance suggest the decision to default is their own. However, they faced intense pressure from their official creditors to treat the two African multilateral financial institutions differently from all their other multilateral creditors.
Why does this differential treatment matter?
Preferred creditor status
Multilateral financial institutions, including the World Bank and African Development Bank, have a preferred creditor status. This is in recognition of the special role they play. They are expected to provide relatively low-cost funding for public investment, economic stability and long-term sustainable development in low- and middle-income countries.
Their preferred creditor status ensures that, when countries experience debt distress, their development mandate is prioritised over the concerns of commercial creditors. Commercial creditors normally only fund commercially viable transactions. They charge high interest rates to compensate for the risk of default on these transactions.
Both Afreximbank and Trade and Development Bank were created to fill a gap in Africa’s access to critical development finance. They provide financing for projects and transactions that commercial institutions and other multilateral financial institutions cannot – or will not – provide, because of capital limits, regulations or perceptions of risk.
the decline in African exports has impacted adversely on the economies of African states and hindered their ability to achieve a self-reliant development.
It further recognises that stimulating economic development
can best be achieved through the creation of a trade financing international institution whose principal purpose is to provide and mobilise the requisite financial resources.
Historically, it has enjoyed preferred creditor status to support its role in meeting this purpose.
Why preferred creditor status is being challenged
The two countries’ official creditor committees, the rating agency Fitch and other commentators are challenging the preferred creditor status of the two African institutions. They argue that the two banks are different from multilateral financial institutions like the World Bank and the African Development Bank that only have states as shareholders. They suggest that the private shareholders in the two African banks should not benefit from preferred creditor status. Instead, they should receive the same status as commercial creditors.
This view ignores the reason that Afreximbank’s and the Trade and Development Bank’s member states authorised them to have private shareholders. It was a deliberate, pragmatic measure designed to fill a gap in Africa’s access to affordable development finance.
The idea was to create new multilateral institutions that could raise capital flexibly and quickly on terms that the individual African states could not match on their own. Several other regional development banks have this hybrid model, including CAF, a highly rated development bank in Latin America.
It is perverse that this creative and pragmatic approach to filling a gap in the global financial system is now being used against the two African banks.
The consequences
The cost of capital for the two African financial institutions will increase if they are treated like commercial creditors. This will reduce their capacity to lend and their financing will become more expensive. It will also deepen inequality in the global financial system. Lastly, it will increase the risk of future African sovereign debt defaults.
In other words, downgrading their status risks undermining the very stability that official creditors claim to safeguard. It will also create another obstacle to Africa’s efforts to access stable, predictable and affordable flows of development finance.
The eventual outcome of the official creditors’ action will ultimately depend on negotiations between Ghana and Zambia and their creditors. This will include the two African institutions. It will also be influenced by how these different groups of creditors behave in other African sovereign debt restructurings.
However, the international community can seek to influence the outcome by taking actions in appropriate international settings.
Global leaders are searching for ways to scale up and strengthen the capacity of regional and subregional development banks like Afreximbank and the Trade and Development Bank. This requires respecting their preferred creditor status and increasing their access to affordable capital.
This is precisely the opposite of what is unfolding.
There is still time for the creditor governments to change course by demonstrating their support for African multilateral financial institutions.
Danny Bradlow, in addition to his position at University of Pretoria, is Senior G20 Advisor to the South African Institute of International Affairs and co-chair of the T20 sask force on sustainable financing.
Lisa Sachs does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
Source: ASEAN – Association of SouthEast Asian Nations
At the invitation of the Government of the Kingdom of Morocco, H.E. Dr. Kao Kim Hourn, Secretary-General of ASEAN, undertook an official visit to Morocco, from 24 to 26 June 2025.
The visit underscored the growing cooperation between ASEAN and Morocco since the formalisation of the Sectoral Dialogue Partnership in 2023. It also reflected both sides’ shared commitment to further strengthening cooperation on promoting trade and investment, digital transformation, sustainable development, and people-to-people exchanges, among others.
While in Rabat, the Secretary-General held meetings with H.E. Nasser Bourita, Minister of Foreign Affairs, African Cooperation and Moroccan Expatriates, H.E. Ryad Mezzour, Minister of Industry and Trade, H.E. Mohamed Saad Berrada, Minister of National Education, Pre-school Learning and Sports, H.E. Mohammed Mehdi Bensaid, Minister of Youth, Culture, and Communication, H.E. Abdeltif Loudyi, Minister Delegate to the Head of Government in Charge of the Administration of National Defense, and Mr. Redouane Arrach, Secretary-General of the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries, Rural Development, Water and Forests. The discussions touched on the deepening of ASEAN-Morocco relations, trade and investment, regional and global developments, and the importance of ASEAN as a regional consensus builder and its stabilising role in the Indo-Pacific region. The Meetings also emphasised the importance of upholding and strengthening the ASEAN Centrality, rules-based international order and the importance of practical cooperation pursued through the ASEAN Outlook on the Indo-Pacific (AOIP).
The Secretary-General also delivered a lecture at the Moroccan Institute of Training, Research and Diplomatic Studies in Rabat where he exchanged views with a range of stakeholders on peace, diplomacy, and regional security issues. In Casablanca, the Secretary-General met with Mr. Said Ibrahimi, CEO of Casablanca Finance City (CFC), and engaged with representatives of the Moroccan General Confederation of Enterprises (CGEM), led by General Vice-President of CGEM, Mr. Mehdi Tazi.
The visit of the Secretary-General of ASEAN to Morocco and his delegation demonstrated the scope and depth of ASEAN-Morocco relations and cooperation over the past years and reaffirmed both sides’ mutual commitment to further strengthening the partnership. ASEAN and Morocco look forward to advancing the implementation of the ASEAN-Morocco Practical Cooperation Areas (2024-2028) which will serve as a framework for tangible cooperation in the years ahead.
The post Joint Summary of the Visit by H.E. Dr. Kao Kim Hourn, Secretary-General of ASEAN, to the Kingdom of Morocco appeared first on ASEAN Main Portal.
Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments
News story
Sir David Calvert-Smith reappointed as judicial member of the Parole Board
The Secretary of State has reappointed Sir David Calvert-Smith as a judicial member of the Parole Board.
The Secretary of State has reappointed Sir David Calvert-Smith as a judicial member of the Parole Board.
Sir David Calvert-Smith’s reappointment is for a third term and will run from 1 July 2025 to 30 June 2027.
The Parole Board is a non-Departmental Public Body sponsored by the MOJ. It works with is criminal justice partners to risk assess prisoners to decide whether they can be safely released into the community.
Biography
Retired as a Judge from the High Court Bench in 2013. Previously been 1st Senior Treasury Counsel, Panelled Counsel to the Serious Fraud Office (SFO), Chairman of the Criminal Bar Association and the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP). He also served as the Parole Board Chair from 2012 to 2016.
Almost 500 miles of the city’s highways and footpaths are currently being treated by the bikes which allow council staff to spray more quickly and efficiently by covering larger areas in less time and targeting weeds more directly.
Using the vehicles reduces both time and costs as previously weed control had been undertaken by council staff on foot and by external contractors. In addition, the updated application method reduces the amount of herbicides used by up to 70% to minimise the impact on local wildlife.
The quad bike teams are currently tackling weeds on highways, footpaths, open spaces and verges to ensure the city is kept looking attractive and presentable for residents and visitors.
Members of staff will be using the bikes for around 20 weeks of spraying a year, covering the period from April to September. In total, 475 miles of highways and footpaths are being treated. Once sprayed, the treatment can take up to 14 days to take effect.
Councillor Bhupinder Gakhal, cabinet member for resident services, said: “We know that weeds can make our city look untidy and unattractive, especially when they grow around pavements, block paved areas and footpaths.
“By using the quad bikes, we can better target the weed control. This will reduce costs and free up resources, helping us to spend money more effectively.
“Quad bikes allow us to access those areas that are more difficult to reach and the teams will follow all relevant safety guidelines to minimise environmental impacts and ensure compliance with the law.
“We have to continue to look at innovative ways to tackle issues like this and we are committed to using the latest technology to maintain our community spaces for everyone to enjoy.”
Financial case study: commercial woodland over 100 hectares
Find out how creating a commercial woodland over 100 hectares stacks up with income through grants, timber, and carbon credits
Understanding woodland financials
Woodland creation is a long-term commitment that can diversify your income. Planting the right tree in the right place, can provide new and reliable income streams and far-reaching benefits for your land, your local community and the environment.
Potential income from a new woodland is dependent on several factors. This includes species, how quickly trees grow, spacing, how long before harvesting occurs (rotation length), woodland size, and the location of your woodland – all of which can vary considerably resulting in several possible combinations and outcomes.
This case study shows how a real landowner created productive woodland. All figures are rounded to the nearest £100 and accurate as of September 2024.
Creating a commercial woodland that benefits nature recovery
A landowner in the north east of England had large area of semi-improved grass land. To meet their management and financial objectives, they created a large-scale productive woodland across approximately 100 hectares of this land. This woodland will also provide wider benefits to society.
The landowner applied for the Woodland Creation Planning Grant (WCPG) and the England Woodland Creation Offer (EWCO) to help fund the project. Over time, the new woodland will:
increase biodiversity
sequester carbon
develop productive stands of broadleaf and conifer species
Additionally, the landowner could benefit from private finance through the Woodland Carbon Code (WCC) and timber markets.
A treemap chart shows the income breakdown of EWCO and WCPG grants. Maintenance: £614,800. Standard costs: £426,800. Woodland infrastructure: £117,700. WCPG: £30,500. Additional contributions – nature recovery: £17,000.
Woodland Creation Planning Grant (WCPG)
Designing new woodland requires bringing together your objectives with the site’s context, suitability; and environmental, economic, and social factors into a UK Forestry Standard (UKFS) compliant plan. This plan helps secure regulatory approval for converting land to woodland.
WCPG provides funding to help cover the cost of producing a UKFS compliant woodland creation design. This project received £30,500 in WCPG grant payments.
England Woodland Creation Offer (EWCO)
EWCO supports the establishment of new woodland by offering financial support for capital costs to plant and protect young trees, costs for maintaining those trees for up to 15 years after planting and installing infrastructure to manage your woodland.
The grant recognises the public and environmental benefits that woodlands bring through stackable payments called Additional Contributions. These encourage planting the right tree in the right place for the right reason.
This 100+ hectare woodland project will receive £1,206,300 (£11,800 per hectare) in EWCO grant payments over 15 years following initial capital work. This includes standard costs, maintenance payments, Additional Contributions and infrastructure payments.
Standard costs for capital work
This project received a payment of £426,800 for capital items needed to make the woodland happen – this covers the cost of buying trees and tree tubes, fencing, gates and other essentials, which offsets most of the establishment costs for this woodland. The highest expenses were deer fencing, purchasing and planting a total of 550,000 trees.
Maintenance payments
The landowner will receive maintenance payments of £400 per hectare for 15 years after planting, totalling £614,800. These payments help with the cost of tree replacement, weeding around the trees and the management of open space within the woodland.
Land managers should expect some tree losses in the early years of planting and plan for replacements. Appropriate maintenance and protection will help minimise these losses. For a project of this scale, up to 165,000 replacement trees might be needed in the first few years.
Additional contributions
EWCO provides extra stackable payments for woodland projects that provide wider benefits to people and the environment. Eligibility depends on the woodland’s design and location.
Woodland projects focused on timber production can deliver a range of public benefits. This new woodland qualified for an Additional Contribution for nature recovery benefits.
The landowner planted approximately 15 hectares of native woodland within the scheme. Converting semi-improved grassland to native woodland in these areas will improve biodiversity, which qualified for a one-off low nature recovery payment of £17,000.
Income from timber
The demand for wood products in the UK hugely outweighs domestic production. We import over 73% of our timber, which was valued at £9.0 billion in 2022, making the UK the second largest net importer of forest products in the world1. This strong market demand for timber creates income opportunities for woodland owners.
This new woodland could generate income from timber in two ways:
the sale of standing trees, usually via an agent, that is harvested by the buyer
the sale of timber harvested by the woodland owner and sold as accessible from the roadside
This case study focuses on sale of standing timber over a 50-year period. The woodland is expected to produce 115,400m3 of timber through:
regular thinning every 5-years (starting year 14)
a clear fell of 27 hectares of conifer woodland (in year 34)
Using an average standing price of £35/m3 for conifer timber, the present value from timber income is estimated to be £1,426,704 (£13,900 per hectare).
Price assumptions
We used £35/m³ based on the average timber price over the last 5 years. Timber prices have the possibility to be higher than assumed in this case study due to the following reasons:
conifer timber prices have increased 200% over the past 20 years
future UK timber demand is expected to remain strong
For simplicity, this case study doesn’t account for increasing maintenance costs over time.
Income from carbon
Carbon markets present an opportunity for landowners to generate more income from their land, by selling the additional carbon that new woodlands will sequester to help mitigate the impacts of climate change.
The Woodland Carbon Code (WCC) is the quality assurance standard for UK-based woodland creation projects hoping to generate carbon credits. Woodland creation projects can sell two types of carbon units under the Code:
Pending Issuance Units (PIUs)
These represent estimated future carbon capture. They’re not guaranteed, so can’t be used to report against emissions, but instead allow companies to plan for future offsetting. PIUs convert into WCUs in vintages and at certain points in time, when this occurs the ‘promise’ of future carbon has been verified as converted into actual carbon storage in the woodland.
Woodland Carbon Units (WCUs)
WCUs are verified units that represent one tonne of carbon dioxide that has been sequestered from the atmosphere. Companies purchasing WCUs make statements about their carbon neutrality as soon as they own them. This often results in a higher price per unit than PIUs. These units are independently verified in vintages after planting.
Projects under the code must meet a set of requirements, including a financial additionality test. This test must show carbon finance is necessary to make the project viable, and woodland income (without carbon credits) doesn’t exceed current land use income.
In this case study, the financial additionality test was passed, woodland creation would generate less income than the existing land use without carbon finance. So, the opportunity to join the voluntary carbon market could be taken up. To find out more about woodland and carbon, read our woodland creation fact sheet.
For this case study it has been assumed that all carbon units will be sold upfront as PIUs however, landowners can choose when to sell these units possibly speculating on future carbon price rises.
The project was registered and validated under the code and the landowner will verify its progress every 10 years from year 5 onwards, selling all its PIUs up front in Year 5. While landowners can hold credits to potentially benefit from future price increases, this case study assumes all units will be sold upfront as PIUs.
Over the first 35 years, the new woodland is likely to deliver over 30,000 WCUs. Using the average price of successful bids at the Woodland Carbon Guarantee auction in 2024 of £25 and assuming upfront sale in year 5 the estimated income from the carbon market is £768,100 (£7,500 per hectare).
A bar chart shows estimated woodland carbon units (WCUs) for various years. Year 5 estimates 70 WCUs. Year 15: 16,610 WCUs. Year 25: 10,230 WCUs. Year 34: 3,020 WCUs. The total estimates 30,730 WCUs.
How does this compare to agricultural income?
As with any change, there will be some costs associated with the establishment of woodland. For this landowner, who previously used the land for various crops, the main cost is foregone agricultural income.
While it’s impossible to predict agricultural income with certainty over a 50-year period, this case study uses the 5-year average Farm Business Income from the annual Farm Business Survey (FBS) for England and Wales to estimate the income foregone.
An infographic showing the comparison of net income (including agricultural income foregone) and net income (excluding agricultural income foregone).
Description of Income
Income
Description of Costs
Costs
WPCG
£30,500
EWCO standard costs and maintenance payments
£884,500
Planting, establishment, and maintenance costs
£1,999,700
EWCO additional contributions
£16,500
Carbon income
£646,700
Woodland Carbon Code costs
£4,600
Net timber income
£1,426,700
Miscellaneous costs such as insurance
£84,100
Agricultural income forgone
523,000
Total income
£3,004,900
Total costs
£2,088,400
When will this income be seen?
While EWCO payments are made up front once planting is completed, followed by 15 years of maintenance, income from timber is realised at different time periods.
The table below displays the timeline of net income over a 50-year period. When looking at net income over time it can be determined that this productive forestry site is likely to break even between year 31 and 35 when the highest amount of timber income is received.
Period
Income
Costs
Net Income
0-10
£1,560,700
£1,985,000
-£424,300
10-20
£366,300
£35,600
£330,700
20-30
£378,300
£25,100
£353,200
30-40
£800,200
£372,100
£428,000
40-50
£13,000
£12,300
£700
Wider benefits of woodland creation
Well-managed woodlands can not only offer an additional income stream, but they can also help you cut costs, for example, you could choose to heat buildings with wood fuel harvested from your woodland. Trees offer much more than just commercial benefits and carbon capture: woodlands can support our health and well-being, improve air and water quality, boost biodiversity, protect crops and livestock, prevent nutrient loss and soil erosion, and alleviate flooding.
AI in education: how schools and further education colleges are making it work
A new report published today by Ofsted shares insights into how ‘early adopter’ schools and further education (FE) colleges across England are integrating generative artificial intelligence (AI) into teaching, learning, and administration.
The research was conducted through 21 interviews with schools, FE colleges and multi-academy trust leaders who have been embedding and using AI for at least 12 months. The findings add to existing knowledge about leadership, governance and practical applications of AI in schools and FE colleges.
The key findings are:
AI champions are playing a crucial role in creating a buzz around AI and supporting staff.
Leaders highlighted the benefits of using AI to reduce teacher workload, particularly for lesson planning, resource creation, and administrative tasks.
Interviewed leaders were keen to emphasise they were prioritising safe, ethical and responsible use of AI for staff, pupils and learners.
The research found that nearly all the providers visited had an ‘AI champion’ – typically teachers with technology expertise who could demystify AI for colleagues and demonstrate its potential. Champions play crucial roles in building staff confidence and demonstrating practical applications of AI for specific teaching needs.
School and FE college leaders said their main reason for introducing AI was to reduce workload for both teaching and administrative staff, with common applications including lesson planning, resource creation, and drafting communications to parents.
Leaders were also keen to emphasise that they were prioritising safe, ethical and responsible use of AI. They had all taken time to research and understand the risks and challenges and had developed mechanisms to address risks related to bias, data protection, intellectual property and safeguarding.
However, the research has identified that more needs to be done to understand effective strategies for using AI in the classroom. Some leaders have not yet thought systematically about how, or where, AI could be integrated into teaching and learning, and the curriculum.
When talking about the challenges, schools discussed the pace of change in AI, as well as the fact that there are not many AI tools tailored to school and college contexts and the specific needs of their pupils and learners.
Ofsted’s report also found that robust and reliable evidence of AI’s impact on educational outcomes is limited. The report notes that most is “explorative, short-term and in limited domains”.
Sir Martyn Oliver, Ofsted’s Chief Inspector, said:
As the use of AI in education increases, we need to better understand how schools and colleges are using this technology to take advantage of its potential, as well as manage the risks it poses for pupils, learners and staff.
While we don’t directly evaluate the use of AI during inspections, we can consider the impact a provider’s use has on the outcomes and experiences of children and learners.
Notes to editors
This research was commissioned by the Department for Education.
AI Airlock, CERSIs and a new global AI network for health regulators
Med Tech Regs blog, June 2025: A focus on Software and AI.
Marinos Ioannides, Head of Software and AI Medical Devices, at the London Healthcare Innovation Forum earlier this year.
Marinos Ioannides, Head of Software and AI Medical Devices:
If you’re anything like me, Summer in Britain is a season of transformation and hope. Gone are the frozen, damp morning dog walks in darkness. Coats and jackets are locked away, half-empty half-forgotten tubes of sun cream emerge from deep cupboards, radiators are joyfully turned off.
The same feeling suffuses the Software and AI team here at the MHRA. Our recent AI Airlock webinar and this week’s opening of our new call for applications boldly announces a new year of inspiration, exploration and progress in innovative regulation. Building on the successes of last year’s excellent pilot programme, we’re eager to unlock and expand insights with industry and see first hand how innovative products and teams can help identify regulatory challenges in the Software as Medical Devices space.
For clarity, the two programmes deliver subtly different changes “behind the scenes” here at MHRA. The direct engagement MHRA has with members of the AI Airlock allows the findings to inform our foundational thinking for the regulation of Software and AI Medical Devices. The information and detail delivered by RADIANT is downstream of this – augmenting what tools, educational material and guidance is provided to help innovators navigate the broader regulatory landscape.
Not to be outdone, CERSI-AI have also ramped up their productivity, coordinating key meetings between academics, clinicians and MHRA to unpick the nuances of AI regulation, now and in the future. With a clear path to sustainability and deliverables already being met, both CERSIs continue to improve and inform this rapidly developing space.
This is part of a broader perspective at MHRA – that innovation and patient safety are not in opposition. Rather, innovation, driven by competition, delivers better products which make patients safer. Demands for patient safety, through clear documentation and proportionate regulation that provides a level playing field and secure, protective framework, create a more transparent market ensuring innovative products excel.
In the spirit of Summer, our work alongside Health AI presents a real growth opportunity. This week we were proud to announce that we became the first country in the world to join Health AI’s new global network of health regulators focussed on the safe and effective use of AI in healthcare. As a founding pioneer nation, we will work with regulators around the world to share early warnings on safety, monitor how AI tools perform in practice, and shape international standards together – helping make AI in healthcare safer and more effective for patients around the world.
Our work in the Digital Mental Health space continues to bear fruit. As we progress and deliver key, actionable insights through our specific guidance, we continue our engagement with experts to direct and augment our publications. If you’re attending the Royal College of Psychiatrists International Conference in Newport this week, you’ll see MHRA representatives there, eager to hear how we can enhance our work to deliver useful insights in this essential HealthTech space.
Just as no good summer holiday is possible without a translation phrasebook, we will shortly be publishing our Good Machine Learning Practice (GMLP) guidance to ease translation between regulatory frameworks. By transparently outlining our logic, we hope that industry, users and other regulators will be reassured of our alignment with international principles in this emergent space and get insights into our thinking and processes. As we refine this piece of keystone guidance, we also continue to progress our CyberSecurity and AI development and deployment guidance and we look forward to publishing that soon.
Beyond software, the innovative devices team moves from success to success with a clear, tangible deliverable from our accelerated Innovative Devices Access Pathway (IDAP). Revolutionary technologies like HistoSonics’ ultrasound device, which breaks up tumours without surgery or radiation, is the sort of thing once considered science fiction. Yet, thanks to the excellent work of IDAP partners and MHRA colleagues, patients now have access to a game changing treatment for liver cancer – an example of smart, agile regulation in action.
And, of course, no Summer would be complete without London Tech Week. It’s a genuine pleasure to see the wonders that innovators continue to create. The opportunity to exchange ideas, debate economics and regulations, and get hands-on experiences with new developments is a real privilege. Presenting our regulatory strategy alongside leaders like David Lawson from the Department of Health and Social Care and Richard Phillips from the Association of British HealthTech Industries at Australia House was an opportunity only surpassed by a chance to see the Lord Mayor of the City of London in the flesh – bedecked with full ceremonial chain and garb!
Whether you’re out in a park turning red while trying to get a year’s supply of Vitamin D, or gritting your teeth as your laptop overheats, don’t curse the season of the sun. The MHRA are here learning, innovating and applying international best practices to maximise patient safety today and tomorrow, whatever the weather!
UK boosts Women, Peace and Security in Philippines and Indonesia
The UK is supporting academic collaboration to advance the Women, Peace and Security agenda across Southeast Asia.
Through its Indo-Pacific Governance Fund and in partnership with the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), the UK is supporting academic collaboration between Mindanao State University (MSU) – Maguindanao and Indonesian universities to advance the Women, Peace and Security (WPS) agenda across Southeast Asia.
A Philippine delegation including representatives from MSU – Maguindanao, Office of the Presidential Adviser on Peace, Reconciliation and Unity – Centre for Excellence on WPS, the Philippine Centre for Islam and Democracy (PCID), the Bangsamoro Women Commission, the Ministry of Public Order and Safety, and the Development Academy of the Bangsamoro recently participated in a four-day international learning exchange in Yogyakarta. The programme featured panel discussions and immersive activities that fostered regional dialogue and co-developed WPS strategies informed by the Philippine and Indonesian experiences.
MSU – Maguindanao Chancellor Dr. Bai Hejira Nefertiti M. Limbona said:
These learning exchanges spark the curiosity that drives meaningful research and action – exactly what we need to not only mainstream the WPS agenda, but to truly transform the challenging situations facing our women, communities and families.
The exchange concluded with the signing of Memoranda of Understanding between MSU – Maguindanao and three Indonesian universities: Gadjah Mada University, Muhammadiyah University of Yogyakarta and Ahmad Dahlan University. The MOU aims to strengthen cooperation on gender education, research, and community engagement.
Prof. Dr. Wening Udasmoro of Universitas Gadjah Mada stated:
The purpose of this MOU is to establish a partnership between our universities – based on the principles of mutual equality and reciprocal benefit. We have many similarities in our diversity and there are several areas we can work on together.
This initiative builds upon the success of MSU – Maguindanao’s Diploma Course on WPS, the first of its kind in Asia. This was launched in 2024 with support from the British Embassy Manila, UNDP and PCID.
The partnerships will contribute to the development of new teaching modules, collaborative research, and regional coordination on shared peace and gender challenges, including violent extremism and climate insecurity.
Nazra Abdi of the British Embassy Manila emphasised the UK’s commitment to support pioneering efforts in advancing the WPS agenda. She stated:
The UK recognises the profound impact of women in peacebuilding, and this initiative underscores our ongoing support to institutionalising WPS across governance, civil society and education in Southeast Asia.
As Southeast Asia prepares to mark the 25th anniversary of UN Security Council Resolution 1325 and the Philippines looks ahead to its ASEAN Chairpersonship in 2026, the initiative underscores the UK’s long-term support for gender-responsive peacebuilding across the region.
Thousands of children with SEND to benefit from assistive tech
Government launches innovative pilot with up to £1.7m available to help children with SEND achieve and thrive at their local school.
Thousands of children with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) will benefit from more support in the classroom, as government launches an innovative, new pilot to trial assistive technology in up to 4,000 schools.
Backed by up to £1.7m, ‘lending libraries’ will be set up in up to 32 local authorities and will enable schools in the area to borrow and trial a range of devices to suit their pupils’ needs.
The lending libraries will be stocked with a range of tools, including reading pens to scan text and read it aloud, dictation tools which convert spoken word into text, and tablets which leverage images to help non-verbal pupils communicate.
This will help schools support a wide range of needs, including dyslexia, autism and ADHD, as well as increasing independence and belonging and helping achieve the government’s mission of excellence everywhere for every child.
The lending libraries model adopts a ‘try before you buy’ approach. This gives schools the opportunity to measure the impact of different devices before making an upfront investment – building confidence in what works and reducing the risk of wasted expenditure.
The impact is clear among schools which have already introduced assistive technology alongside staff training, with 86% of school staff surveyed identifying a positive impact on behaviour and 89% witnessing greater confidence amongst pupils with SEND.
Minister for School Standards, Catherine McKinnell said:
We’re committed to reforming the SEND system to break down barriers to learning and achieve excellence everywhere for every child.
Assistive technology can play a key role in this and unlocks learning for so many children – so that attention difficulties, communication issues or struggles with literacy don’t stand in the way of children learning with their friends at their local school.
We’re committed to driving inclusivity across all schools and this pilot is a brilliant step towards making that happen, supporting teachers and giving all children the tools they need to achieve and thrive.”
The investment comes as new government statistics reveal that the number of children with EHCPs has increased by 11% to 638,700, clearly highlighting that needs are not being met early enough.
The government is committed to turning this around by ensuring schools are able to identify needs at the earliest point and have the expertise and resources to deliver the support that’s needed and reassure parents that their children can achieve and thrive in mainstream education.
Bryony Herbert, parent of a pupil at Leo Academy Trust, said:
My son, Archie, has dyslexia and always used to struggle getting his thoughts down onto paper without getting frustrated and upset. He often found his homework too difficult as he did not understand certain words or what they meant, making him incredibly emotional.
Now, he has access to a chrome book laptop provided by his school with talk to text functions. These functions allow him to have pieces of text read out to him, and he can respond back with the laptop noting his responses – massively benefitting him as he no longer relies on reading to access information.
Archie is now willing to sit down and do his homework whilst actually enjoying what he is learning because he doesn’t have to struggle anymore. He is also generally much happier as a result of the resources he has been given as he can properly express himself and his thoughts are no longer stuck in his head.
The impact also extends to the workforce, with assistive technology helping free up teacher and support staff time. Pupils will still receive the additional assistance they need, while staff can focus on what they do best – the face-to-face teaching that transforms pupils’ life chances.
The pilot will help address the gap in awareness around assistive technology, with only 13% of mainstream school leaders surveyed having heard of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) devices – which enable a child to click images or words on a touchscreen that the device reads aloud – and only 6% having introduced them.
Julaan Govier, Curriculum Lead and Digital Champion & Cheryl Shirley, Director of Digital Learning, at LEO Academy Trust schools, said:
Assistive technology has been a fantastic way to promote innovative and creative ways to access learning.
Before using assistive technology, we were recognising many challenges children were facing in being able to fully access the curriculum. A handful of our students with dyslexic tendencies often felt frustrated as they were unable to vocalise themselves and found it really difficult to communicate through traditional methods.
The integration of assistive technologies, which offer screen masks, screen readers, picture dictionaries, and translators, along with voice-to-text features, has profoundly transformed student learning and well-being. These tools enable students to increase their focus by eliminating distractions and reducing cognitive overload, and to communicate and demonstrate their understanding in ways that best suit their individual preferences. All our students are now able to integrate into their classrooms, with their peers, giving them dignity and confidence by working privately and in ways that work best for them.
The pilot builds on the recent extension of the PINS and ELSEC programmes, which upskill the teacher workforce and embed specialist support in mainstream settings, to ensure children with autism, ADHD or speech and language difficulties don’t go unnoticed.
These are critical steps on the government’s mission to break down barriers to opportunity for children with SEND and ensure all children have the support they need to thrive in a mainstream setting. More details of the government’s intended approach to SEND reform will be set out in a Schools White Paper in the autumn.
Annamarie Hassall MBE, Chief Executive at Nasen said:
At nasen we have seen the benefit of technology in the classroom. It’s useful for all and particularly beneficial for pupils with learning differences and SEND needs.
Assistive technology (AT) tools are increasingly built into everyday technology, ready to be enabled, and likewise there is a growing range of tailored AT products and resources available.
From our work on AT with schools, colleges and settings, we know that having an opportunity to test out resources would build confidence. That’s confidence of classroom staff and pupils alike, ensuring the best match of resources for the learning or access need.
This is supported by wider investment to get more classes online and improve digital infrastructure, including £25 million to upgrade wireless networks this year and £20 million to complete delivery of fibre upgrades to 833 schools. Providing connectivity for more than 1.3 million pupils in 3,700 schools so far, as part of the government’s wide-reaching Digital Inclusion Action Plan which will give the most digitally excluded groups the confidence and skills to benefit from digitisation.
Assistive technology lending libraries form one part of the government’s work testing SEND reforms through a reformulated Change Programme, focused on early intervention and support in mainstream schools.
Local authorities participating in the pilot will be confirmed over the Summer, with pupils set to benefit from the start of the new school year.
The delivery partner CENMAC will work closely with the Department for Education and participating local authorities to bring the lending library model to life, drawing on over 50 years of experience in assistive technology and inclusion.
Source: Rosneft – Rosneft – An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.
The Zvezda shipyard handed over the keys to 160 apartments in new buildings in the city of Bolshoy Kamen to its workers on the eve of the professional holiday – Shipbuilder’s Day. The construction of two eight-story buildings by the shipyard marked the beginning of the formation of the new microdistrict Sadovy in the coastal zone.
The apartments with panoramic sea views are completely ready for occupancy: interior decoration is complete, plumbing and electric stoves are installed, and balconies are glazed. Sports and children’s playgrounds, as well as parking for residents’ vehicles, have been created on the adjacent territory. In total, eight buildings with 600 apartments with a total area of over 28 thousand square meters will be built in the microdistrict during the year.
The Sadovy microdistrict is the next stage of the project to build housing for Zvezda workers. Today, the number of Zvezda shipyard employees has already exceeded 5,700 people. Taking into account the expansion of the shipyard’s activities and the increase in the number of workers and their families, the population of Bolshoy Kamen will increase by almost a third. Providing shipbuilders with housing and infrastructure is one of the shipyard’s priority tasks; the total number of apartments will exceed 5 thousand in seven microdistricts.
The housing construction program for shipbuilders has been implemented since 2016. During this time, 38 residential buildings in five microdistricts have been commissioned and occupied, including seven buildings built by the Government of Primorsky Krai.
Reference:
The Zvezda shipbuilding complex is being created in the city of Bolshoy Kamen in Primorsky Krai on the instructions of the President of Russia, with Rosneft acting as the project operator. The shipyard is designed to produce large-tonnage vessels with a displacement of up to 350 thousand tons, ice-class vessels, special vessels and other types of marine equipment.
SSC Zvezda closely cooperates with various educational institutions: it organizes targeted training, organizes internships and employment of graduates, holds Enterprise Days and job fairs. In addition, in 2024, SSC Zvezda’s own corporate Center for Professional Training began operating, designed to train and improve the skills of personnel in more than 30 specialized areas.
Department of Information and Advertising of PJSC NK Rosneft June 27, 2025
Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.
